alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          33,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  473,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,853
<INVENTORY>                                     39,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               592,491
<PP&E>                                       1,418,161
<DEPRECIATION>                                 491,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,330,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          478,327
<BONDS>                                        808,122
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,588
<OTHER-SE>                                     832,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,330,707
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,658,150
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  962,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               494,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                151,245
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             91,811
<DISCONTINUED>                               (154,927)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (63,116)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.16)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)
        
<FN>
<F1>Represents Basic EPS
</FN>

</TABLE>
§ 304.1 Application for inspection. ( a ) Before the inspection is granted, each person conducting operations at an establishment subject to the Act, whether tenant, subsidiary, or landlord, shall make application therefor to the Administrator as provided for in this part.
( b ) Every application under this section shall be made on an official form furnished by the Program, available from any Regional Director identified in § 301.2(kkk) of this subchapter, and shall be completed to include all information requested. Trade names of the applicant for labeling purposes, shall be inserted in the appropriate blank in the application. Each applicant for inspection will be held responsible for compliance with the Act and the regulations in this subchapter if inspection is granted. Preparation of product and other operations at the establishment for which inspection is granted may be conducted only by the applicant named in the application.
( c ) In cases of change of ownership or location, a new application shall be made.
[40 FR 2575, Jan. 14, 1975, as amended at 53 FR 49848, Dec. 12, 1988]
#### § 312.5 Official seals for transportation of products.

The official mark for use in sealing railroad cars or other means of conveyance as prescribed in [part 325 of this subchapter](/on/2024-07-03/title-9/part-325) shall be the inscription and a serial number as hereinafter shown[[2](#312.5-footnote-2)] and any seal approved by the Administrator for applying such mark shall be an official device for purposes of the Act. This seal shall be attached to the means of conveyance only by a Program employee and he shall also affix thereto a “Warning Tag” (Form MP-408-3).

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC11SE91.008/EC11SE91.008_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC11SE91.008/EC11SE91.008_original_size.png)

[[35 FR 15573](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/35-FR-15573), Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at [39 FR 36000](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/39-FR-36000), Oct. 7, 1974; [51 FR 37707](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-37707), Oct. 24, 1986]

###### Footnotes - [312.5](/on/2024-07-03/title-9/section-312.5)

[[2](#312.5-footref-2)] The number “2135202” is given as an example only. The serial number of the specific seal will be shown in lieu thereof.
### §60. National bank dividends

#### (a) In general

Subject to subsection (b), the directors of any national bank may declare a dividend of so much of the undivided profits of the bank as the directors judge to be expedient.

#### (b) Approval required under certain circumstances

A national bank may not declare and pay dividends in any year in excess of an amount equal to the sum of the total of the net income of the bank for that year and the retained net income of the bank for the preceding 2 years, minus the sum of any transfers required by the Comptroller of the Currency and any transfers required to be made to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock, unless the Comptroller of the Currency approves the declaration and payment of dividends in excess of such amount.

(R.S. §5199; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title III, §315, 49 Stat. 712; Pub. L. 86–230, §21(a), Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 465; Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(h)(2), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2294; Pub. L. 109–351, title III, §302(a), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1970.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5199 derived from act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, §33, 13 Stat. 109, which was the National Bank Act. See section 38 of this title.

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–351 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to periodic declarations of dividends subject to certain surplus fund requirements and to the approval of the Comptroller of the Currency in certain situations.

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–325, §602(h)(2)(A), (B), substituted "undivided profits of the association, subject to the limitations in subsection (b) of this section," for "net profits of the association" in first sentence and "net income" for "net profits" wherever subsequently appearing.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–325, §602(h)(2)(B), substituted "net income" for "net profits" in two places.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–325, §602(h)(2)(C), struck out subsec. (c) which read as follows: "For the purpose of this section the term 'net profits' shall mean the remainder of all earnings from current operations plus actual recoveries on loans and investments and other assets, after deducting from the total thereof all current operating expenses, actual losses, accrued dividends on preferred stock, if any, and all Federal and State taxes."

1959—Pub. L. 86–230 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), authorized the declaration of dividends, quarterly and annually, when at least one-tenth of the bank's net profits of the preceding half year or of the preceding two consecutive half-year periods has been carried to the surplus fund, respectively, and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

1935—Act Aug. 23, 1935, among other changes, inserted proviso.
CL17 Free Chlorine Analyzer with AquaTrend Network 

 Overview 

 Details 

 Parameter/Reagent 

 Downloads 

 Video 

 Accessories 

 Similar Products 

Product #: 5440003 

USD Price: $3,448.00 

Ships within 2 weeks 

Quantity 

1 

Add to Cart 

Accurate, Reliable Results 

The Hach CL17 Chlorine Analyzer uses colorimetric DPD chemistry to monitor water continuously for free or total 

residual chlorine. The CL17 is a simple, dependable and economic solution, and the preferred choice to highmaintenance instruments that require frequent calibration. The CL17 analysis method is robust and not affected by 

changes in chlorine concentration, sample pH, temperature, flow, or pressure, thus offering more accuracy and 

reliability than alternative instruments and technologies. 

Simple, Predictable Maintenance 

Monthly routine maintenance for the CL17 can typically be performed in 15 minutes and includes changing reagents 

and cleaning the colorimetric cell. No special tools are required. For typical use, the CL17 will operate unattended for 

30 days. Challenging applications may require more frequent cleaning. 

Factory Calibrated 

The CL17 Chlorine Analyzer is factory calibrated. A built-in electronic calibration curve is preprogrammed into the 

instrument. This instrument does not require recalibration unless specified by your regulatory agency for compliance 

reporting purposes. 

EPA Compliant 

The CL17 is compliant with US EPA regulation 40 CFR 140.74, and both Method 4500-CL G and Method 334.0 can 

be used for measurement of residual chlorine in drinking water. 

Pump Control 

Both an alarm for manual chlorine feed control and a 4-20 mA output for automatic control of chlorine feed pumps is 

available on the CL17 Analyzer. 

What's in the box 

Hach CL17 Chlorine Analyzers are shipped with a one-month supply of reagents, maintenance kit, installation kit, and 

manual. (The power cord is ordered separately.) 

Specifications 

Interferences: N/A 

Recorder Outputs: N/A N/A 

Relative Humidity: N/A
#### David Mitchell et al. *v.*Norman Baptiste et al.

*Robert Q. Zaneshy,*in support of the petition.

*Harry H. Hefferan, Jr.,*in opposition.

Submitted June 24

decided July *2,*1974

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Court of Common Pleas is denied.
#### § 156.6 Certificates.

The inspector shall sign and issue certificates in forms approved by the Administrator for animal products, if the inspector finds that the requirements as stated in the certification have been met. The original and one copy of each certificate shall be furnished to the applicant, and one copy of each certificate shall be retained by the Department until disposal is authorized in accordance with law. Additional copies may be furnished the applicant at his request upon payment of the fees prescribed in § 156.7. Copies of the certificates may be furnished without charge to other properly interested Federal agencies or under compulsory process.

[23 FR 10111, Dec. 23, 1958, as amended at 57 FR 30899, July 13, 1992; 62 FR 19040, Apr. 18, 1997]
### **CHAPTER 60—NATURAL GAS POLICY**

Sec.
3301.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—WELLHEAD PRICING

3311 to 3320, 3331 to 3333. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—INCREMENTAL PRICING

3341 to 3348. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—ADDITIONAL AUTHORITIES AND REQUIREMENTS

#### Part A—Emergency Authority

3361.
Declaration of emergency.
3362.
Emergency purchase authority.
3363.
Emergency allocation authority.
3364.
Miscellaneous provisions.

#### Part B—Other Authorities and Requirements

3371.
Authorization of certain sales and transportation.
3372.
Assignment of contractual rights to receive surplus natural gas.
3373.
Effect of certain natural gas prices on indefinite price escalator clauses.
3374.
Clauses prohibiting certain sales, transportation, and commingling.
3375.
Filing of contracts and agreements.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—NATURAL GAS CURTAILMENT POLICIES

3391.
Natural gas for essential agricultural uses.
3391a.
"Essential agricultural use" defined.
3392.
Natural gas for essential industrial process and feedstock uses.
3393.
Establishment and implementation of priorities.
3394.
Limitation on revoking or amending certain pre-1969 certificates of public convenience and necessity.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—ADMINISTRATION, ENFORCEMENT, AND REVIEW

3411.
General rulemaking authority.
3412.
Administrative procedure.
3413.
Repealed.
3414.
Enforcement.
3415.
Intervention.
3416.
Judicial review.
3417.
Repealed.
3418.
Applicability of other Federal statutory provisions relating to information-gathering.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—COORDINATION WITH NATURAL GAS ACT; MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

3431.
Coordination with the Natural Gas Act.
3432.
Effect on State laws.
# C_2007038EN.01000202.xml

| 22.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4408 — Tata/Corus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 38/04)

On 21 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4408. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4408. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****U.S.commercial space transportation developments and concepts: vehicles,technologies, and spaceports.**** 
SuDocNumber:TD4.87/2-4:
ItemNumber:0431-C-69(online)
CGPSystem Number: 000600856
 
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011**
# C_2010288EN.01002001.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/20

---

Appeal brought on 22 July 2010 by EMC Development AB against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 May 2010 in Case T-432/05: EMC Development AB v European Commission

(Case C-367/10 P)

()

(2010/C 288/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: EMC Development AB (represented by: W.-N. Schelp, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| (i) | annul the Commission's Decision dated 28.09.05; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

annul the Commission's Decision dated 28.09.05;

| (ii) | in the alternative to (i), set aside the Judgment under appeal in whole or in part and refer the case back to the General Court for an adjudication on the substance, in the light of the guidance which this Court may provide to it; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

in the alternative to (i), set aside the Judgment under appeal in whole or in part and refer the case back to the General Court for an adjudication on the substance, in the light of the guidance which this Court may provide to it;

| (iii) | in any event, Order the Commission to pay the costs of the Applicant incurred before the General Court and the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

in any event, Order the Commission to pay the costs of the Applicant incurred before the General Court and the Court of Justice.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submits that the General Court, in adopting the Commission's positions vis à vis the Guidelines, required the appellant to prove matters of fact and placed an unassailable burden upon the appellant. In so doing it has sought to require proof of the Standard's effects without considering the wider and more fundamental issues of its nature. The applicant considers that this constitutes an error of law and that the order of procedure of the tests as between the nature and the effects of the Standard have been reversed.

---
§ 146.33 Terminology and classification; meat-type chicken slaughter plants. Participating meat-type chicken slaughter plants that have met the respective requirements specified in this section may be designated by the following terms and the corresponding designs illustrated in § 146.9 of this part: ( a ) *U.S. H5/H7 Avian Influenza Monitored.* This program is intended to be the basis from which the meat-type chicken industry may conduct a program to monitor for the H5/H7 subtypes of avian influenza. It is intended to determine the presence of the H5/H7 subtypes of avian influenza in meat-type chickens through routine surveillance of each participating meat-type chicken slaughter plant. A meat-type chicken slaughter plant will qualify for this classification when the Official State Agency determines that it has met one of the following requirements: ( 1 ) It is a meat-type chicken slaughter plant where a minimum of 11 birds per shift are tested negative for the H5/H7 subtypes of avian influenza, as provided in § 146.13(b), at slaughter; *Provided,* that with the approval of the Official State Agency, fewer than 11 birds per shift may be tested on any given shift if the total number of birds tested during the operating month is equivalent to testing 11 birds per shift; or
( 2 ) It is a meat-type chicken slaughter plant which accepts only meat-type chickens from flocks where a minimum of 11 birds have been tested negative for antibodies to the H5/H7 subtypes of avian influenza, as provided in § 146.13(b), no more than 21 days prior to slaughter; or
( 3 ) It is a meat-type chicken slaughter plant that has an ongoing active and diagnostic surveillance program for the H5/H7 subtypes of avian influenza in which the number of birds tested is equivalent to the number required in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) and that is approved by the Official State Agency and the Service.
( b ) [Reserved]
[71 FR 56328, Sept. 26, 2006, as amended at 76 FR 15797, Mar. 22, 2011; 79 FR 38766, July 9, 2014]
§ 146.5 Specific provisions for all participating flocks. ( a ) Participating flocks, and all equipment used in connection with the flocks, shall be separated from non-participating flocks in a manner acceptable to the Official State Agency.
( b ) Poultry equipment, and poultry houses and the land in the immediate vicinity thereof, shall be kept in sanitary condition in accordance with part 147 of this subchapter.
[71 FR 56328, Sept. 26, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 38765, July 9, 2014]
The fund has two classes of shares - Small-Cap Value,
offered since June 30, 1988, and
Small-Cap Value Advisor Class, first offered on March 31,
2000.  Small-Cap Value
Advisor Class sells its shares only through financial
intermediaries, which it compensates
for distribution and certain administrative services under a
Board-approved Rule 12b-1
plan.  Each class has exclusive voting rights on matters
related solely to that class, separate
voting rights on matters that relate to both classes, and,
in all other respects, the same rights
and obligations as the other class.
### §1141a. International applications based on United States applications or registrations

#### (a) In general

The owner of a basic application pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or the owner of a basic registration granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office may file an international application by submitting to the United States Patent and Trademark Office a written application in such form, together with such fees, as may be prescribed by the Director.

#### (b) Qualified owners

A qualified owner, under subsection (a), shall—

(1) be a national of the United States;

(2) be domiciled in the United States; or

(3) have a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the United States.

(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title XII, §61, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13402, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1915.)
# C_2011030EN.01006802.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/68

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 September 2010 — De Roos-Le Large v Commission

(Cases F-39/10 and F-39/10 R)

()

2011/C 30/136

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6412

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PIOQUINTO PENALOZA-BANOS, a/k/a Jose Luis Banos Aydaya, 

a/k/a Jose Luis Banos, a/k/a Daniel Banos Andaya, a/k/a 

Pioquinto Banos, a/k/a Michael Burciaga, a/k/a Pioquinto 

Banos-Andalla,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cr-00434-WO-2; 1:08-cv-00534-WO-WWD)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pioquinto Penaloza-Banos, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane 

Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Pioquinto Penaloza-Banos seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2010) motion, and its subsequent order denying reconsideration. 

The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) 

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Penaloza-Banos has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.2


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


 As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our
 report dated December 18, 2002 for the  year ended October 31, 2002  and our
 report dated December 1, 2000  for the year ended  October 31, 2000 in  Dial
 Thru International Corporation's  Annual Report on  Form 10-K  for the  year
 ended October 31,  2002 as well  as the incorporation  by reference  of such
 reports into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement File  No.
 333-82622.

 /s/ KING GRIFFIN & ADAMSON P.C.

 Dallas, Texas
 January 29, 2002