alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



                           CERTIFICATIONS  PURSUANT  TO
                             18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  FTS  Apparel,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ending  June  30, 2003, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of  the  Company,  certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



                         /s/  Scott  Gallagher
                         ______________________________________
                         By:  Scott  Gallagher
                         Chief  Executive  Officer
                         August  14,  2003
§ 1000.129 Are there any programs that may not be included in an AFA? Yes, section 403(k) of the Act excludes from the program: ( a ) Inherently Federal functions; and
( b ) Programs where the statute establishing the existing program does not authorize the type of participation sought by the Tribe/Consortium, except as provided in § 1000.134.
# C_2012138EN.01002803.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/28

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 April 2011 — Wilk v Commission

(Case F-32/10) (1)

(Civil Service - Members of the temporary staff - Reimbursement of expenses - Installation allowance - Installation with family at the place of employment - Recovery of undue payments - Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2012/C 138/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Christian Wilk (Trier, Germany) (represented by: R. Adam, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of decisions ordering recovery of one half of the installation allowance paid to the applicant following his divorce, and an application for damages

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Mr Wilk’s action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Mr Wilk’s action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Mr Wilk is to bear all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Wilk is to bear all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010, p. 60.

---
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Walter  Thomsen,  certify,  PURSUANT  TO  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly
report  of  Proteo, Inc. on form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  Proteo,  Inc.



Date:    August  12,  2004                   By:  /s/  Walter  Thomsen
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Walter  Thomsen
                                           Chief  Executive  Officer  &
                                           Chief  Financial  Officer



A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  typed  from  within  the  electronic  version of this written statement
required  by Section 906, has been provided to Proteo, Inc. and will be retained
by  Proteo,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.
No. 89-5120.

#### Perry *v.*Louisiana.

19th Jud. Dist. Ct., Crim. Section V, Parish of East Baton Rouge, La. Motion of pe*1016titioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended  December  31,  2005 (the  "Report")  of  Farnsworth  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission,  we, Gary N.
Pelehaty,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Charles  Alessi,  Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer,  Treasurer and Secretary,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/Gary N. Pelehaty                     /s/Charles Alessi
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
Gary N. Pelehaty                        Charles Alessi
President and Chief Executive Officer   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
                                        Treasurer and Secretary




February 2, 2006
Together, America Prospers

Rural Business Development Grants

What does this 

program do?

Rural Business Development 

Grants (RBDGs) support 

targeted technical assistance, 

training, and other activities 

that promote the development 

and expansion of small and 

emerging private businesses 

in rural areas. Eligible 

businesses must have fewer 

than 50 employees and less 

than $1 million in gross annual 

revenues. RBDG funding 

is separated into either 

enterprise or opportunity-type 

grant activities. 

Who can apply?

Eligible applicants include:

• Rural cooperatives

• State agencies, towns, and 

communities 

• Nonprofit corporations 

and institutions of higher 

learning

• Federally recognized Tribes 

What is an eligible area?

The RBDG supports projects 

benefiting rural areas outside 

of urbanized areas that have 

populations of 50,000 or more. You 

can use the USDA Income and 

Property Eligibility site (available 

at this link: tinyurl.com/8ysytefa) to 

determine your area’s eligibility. 

How can funds be used? 

Among other things, enterprisetype grant uses include:

• Training and technical 

assistance, including project 

planning, business counseling, 

market research, feasibility 

studies, and product or service 

improvements

• Buying or developing land, 

easements, or rights of way, 

including access streets and 

parking areas

• Constructing or renovating 

buildings, and buying machinery 

and equipment

• Capitalizing revolving loan funds

• Supporting rural business 

incubators and community 

economic development

Among other things, opportunitytype grants can support:

• Business support centers

• Technology-based economic 

development

• Leadership and entrepreneur 

training

• Feasibility studies, business 

plans, and long-term strategic 

planning, and other eligible 

activities

What are some grant terms? 

Generally, grants range from 

$10,000 to $500,000, and there 

is no cost-sharing requirement. 

Opportunity-type grants are limited 

to no more than 10 percent of the 

total available RBDG funds. 

How do we get started? 

Applications are accepted annually 

through your state-based USDA 

Rural Development office. A list of 

offices is available at this link: 

tinyurl.com/bddtm6vj.

What governs this program? 

• The basic RBDG program is 

governed by 7 CFR Part 4280, 

Subpart E, available at this link: 

tinyurl.com/yc2psnzu.

NOTE: Because information changes, always consult official program 

instructions or contact your local Rural Development office for help. A list 

is available at this link: go.usa.gov/xJHPE. You will find additional resources, 

forms, and program information at rd.usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider, employer, and lender.

Last revised March 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 113

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

#### § 113.10 Testing of bulk material for export or for further manufacture.

When a product is prepared in a licensed establishment for export in large multiple-dose containers as provided in § 112.8(d) or (e) of this subchapter or for further manufacturing purposes as provided in § 114.3(d) of this subchapter, samples of the bulk material shall be subjected to all required tests prescribed in the filed Outline of Production or Standard Requirements for the product. Samples of concentrated liquid product shall be diluted to a volume equal to the contents of the sample times the concentration factor prior to initiating potency tests.

[49 FR 45846, Nov. 21, 1984]
Exhibit 99.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Robert D. Parks, the Chief Executive Officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/____________________________________

Name: Robert D. Parks

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 2, 2002
exv4w1






Exhibit 4.1







	CUSIP 45811E 30 1





 









 








	INTEGRATED ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. The Corporation will furnish to any stockholder, upon request
and without charge, a statement of the powers, designations, and relative rights, preferences and
limitations of each class of stock or series thereof of the Corporation, and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such request may be made to the
Corporation or the Transfer Agent. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the
face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM — as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT— Custodian TEN
ENT JT TEN — as tenants by the entireties — as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not
as tenants in common under UniforAct (Cust) m Gifts to Minors (State) (Minor) UNIF TRF MIN ACT—
(Cust) Custodian (until age ) to Minors Act (Minor) under Uniform Transfers (State) Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For Value received, hereby sell(s),
assign(s) and transfer(s) unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF
ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of
the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do(es) hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint Attorney to transfer the said shares on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises. Dated, X (SIGNATURE) X NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS
ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY
PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. (SIGNATURE) SIGNATURE(S)
GUARANTEED: By THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED
SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
§ 3.54 Feeding. ( a ) Rabbits shall be fed at least once each day except as otherwise might be required to provide adequate veterinary care. The food shall be free from contamination, wholesome, palatable and of sufficient quantity and nutritive value to meet the normal daily requirements for the condition and size of the rabbit.
( b ) Food receptacles shall be accessible to all rabbits in a primary enclosure and shall be located so as to minimize contamination by excreta. All food receptacles shall be kept clean and sanitized at least once every 2 weeks. If self feeders are used for the feeding of dry feed, measures must be taken to prevent molding, deterioration or caking of the feed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-51159

Summary Calendar

RICARDO CARDENAS-ROMO,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, RCDC III; BUREAU OF

PRISONS; U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondents-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CV-96

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Ricardo Cardenas-Romo,former federal prisoner # 23653-208, appeals the

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his exclusion from

rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. As Cardenas-Romo has been

released from Bureau of Prisons custody, we grant Respondents’ motion to

dismiss the appeal as moot. See Calderon v. Moore, 518 U.S. 149, 150 (1996). 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 3, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 10-51159 Document: 00512100341 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/03/2013
No. 10-51159

Respondents’ alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is denied

as unnecessary.

MOTION TODISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED;MOTION FOR

AN EXTENSION OF TIME DENIED.

2

 Case: 10-51159 Document: 00512100341 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/03/2013
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ajay Sabherwal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ AJAY SABHERWAL Ajay Sabherwal Chief Financial Officer


September 29, 2010

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12936-12937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1747]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 72 Under Alternative Site 
Framework; Indianapolis, IN

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74 
FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09; 75 FR 71069-71070, 
11/22/10) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of 
general-purpose zones;
    Whereas, the Indianapolis Airport Authority, grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone 72, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 50-
2010, filed 8/17/2010) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with a 
service area of Bartholomew, Benton, Boone, Carroll, Cass, Clay, 
Clinton, Decatur, Delaware, Fayette, Fountain, Franklin, Grant, Greene, 
Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Henry, Howard, Jennings, Johnson, 
Lawrence, Madison, Marion, Miami, Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Owen, 
Parke, Putnam, Rush, Shelby, Tippecanoe, Tipton, Vigo, Warren, Wayne 
and White Counties, Indiana, adjacent to the Indianapolis Customs and 
Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 72's existing Sites 1-3 and 12-13 
would be categorized as magnet sites, existing Sites 9-11 would be 
categorized as usage-driven sites and the grantee

[[Page 12937]]

proposes three additional magnet sites (Sites 6-8);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (75 FR 51752-51753, 8/23/2010) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 72 under the alternative site 
framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 2,000-
acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, to 
a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate 
authority for Sites 2-3, 6-8 and 12-13 if not activated by March 31, 
2016, and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites 
that would terminate authority for Sites 9-11 if no foreign-status 
merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose by March 31, 
2014.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of March, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-5389 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

80-19 

November 13, 1980 

REFERENCE: 

4021(b)(7) Plans Covered. Foreign Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request for a determination by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC")

as to whether the above plan (the "Plan") is excluded from coverage under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") by Section 4021(b)(7) of the Act. We have concluded that the Plan is excluded from

coverage. 

Section 4021(b)(7) excludes from coverage any plan "which is established and maintained outside of the United

States primarily for the benefit of individuals substantially all of whom are nonresident aliens." You have represented

that * * * the plan administrator/plan sponsor, is located in California and that the Plan's assets are held in California by

the Trust Company of California, which is responsible for benefit administration. 

However, you have also represented that all Plan records with respect to participation, vesting, and benefit accrual

are maintained in Hong Kong and that all of the Plan's participants are nonresident aliens (residents of Hong Kong) who

work outside the United States. 

The question of whether a plan "is established and [*2] maintained outside of the United States" may be determined

only with respect to the facts and circumstances of the operation of a particular plan. However, one of the factors to

which the PBGC will attach particular weight is the work location of the employees covered by the Plan. Based on the

representations which you have made, described in the paragraphs immediately preceding, the PBGC has made a

determination that the Plan is excluded from coverage. 

 The Department of Labor has indicated that it agrees with the conclusions expressed in this letter for purposes of

its interpretation of Section 4(b)(4) of the Act. 

We will notify the PBGC's Office of Financial Operations to arrange for a refund of premium payments. 

I hope I have been of assistance. If you have any questions, please contact the attorney assigned to this case, * *

* at (202) 254-3010. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
# C_2012138EN.01003001.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/30

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-67/10) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Action for damages relating to the taxation of costs - Inadmissibility)

(2012/C 138/64)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to reimburse two thirds of the costs incurred by the applicant in Case F-41/06.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.1.2010, p. 74.

---
### §2128. Recall to active duty with consent of officer

(a) Any regular officer on the retired list may, with that officer's consent, be assigned to such duties as that officer may be able to perform.

(b) The number of retired officers on active duty in the grade of lieutenant commander, commander, or captain shall not exceed 2 percent of the authorized number of officers on active duty in each such grade. However, this limitation does not apply to retired officers of these grades recalled to serve as members of courts, boards, panels, surveys, or special projects for periods not to exceed one year.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 189, §332; amended Pub. L. 89–444, §1(18), June 9, 1966, 80 Stat. 196; Pub. L. 91–278, §1(9), June 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 305; Pub. L. 102–241, §14, Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2213; renumbered §2128, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §112(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 332 of this title as this section.

1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–241, §14(b), substituted "that officer's" for "his" and "that officer" for "he".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–241, §14(a), substituted "2" for "1".

1970—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–278 struck out prohibition against recall to duty in time of peace of any officer on retired list who reached age of sixty-two years.

1966—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 89–444 provided that the percentage limitation on the number of retired officers on active duty in the grade of lieutenant commander, commander, or captain should not apply to retired officers of those grades recalled to serve as members of courts, boards, panels, surveys, or special projects for periods not to exceed one year.