alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 Digital River, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands, except ratios)
 ThreemonthsendedYears ended December 31,
    
    March 31,2002
    
    2003
    
    2004
    
    2005
    
    2006
    
    2007Income (Loss) from operations as
reported
    
    $
    (916
    )
    
    $
    16,298
    
    
    $
    34,762
    
    
    $
    66,713
    
    
    $
    67,595
    
    
    $
    23,015Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    165
    
    
    
    235
    
    
    
    2,094
    
    
    
    3,092
    
    
    
    3,240
    
    
    
    830Earnings as defined
    
    
    (751
    )
    
    
    16,533
    
    
    
    36,856
    
    
    
    69,805
    
    
    
    70,835
    
    
    
    23,845Fixed charges
    
    $
    165
    
    
    $
    235
    
    
    $
    2,094
    
    
    $
    3,092
    
    
    $
    3,240
    
    
    $
    830Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    70.4
    
    
    
    17.6
    
    
    
    22.6
    
    
    
    21.9
    
    
    
    28.7
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing income (loss) from operations
plus fixed charges by
fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of debt issuance costs and
that portion of rental payments under operating leases that we believe to be representative of
interest. Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges in 2002 by an amount equal to the net
loss for the period.
# C_2014009EN.01002903.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/29

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 October 2013 — De Roos-Le Large v Commission

(Case F-50/10) (1)

1

2014/C 9/49

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Tribunal sitting in a Full Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010, p. 27.

1

---
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Arthur Simms

*Arlen D. Nickowitz,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*Edward F. Kunin,*special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).

Argued June 4

decided June 4, 1974

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted unless a request for a finding and draft finding is filed on or before July 2,1974, or, in the alternative, a report pursuant to the procedure noted in *State*v. *Pascucci,*161 Conn. 382, is filed with the court.
#### § 110.18 Voting age population.

There is annually published by the Department of Commerce in the Federal Register an estimate of the voting age population based on an estimate of the voting age population of the United States, of each State, and of each Congressional district. The term *voting age population* means resident population, 18 years of age or older.

[68 FR 457, Jan. 3, 2003]
Exhibit 14.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-111779) and the
Registration Statement on Form F-4 (No. 333-112948) of Millicom International Cellular, S.A. of our report dated June 4, 2004 relating to the financial
statements of Telefónica Celular, S. A., which appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Millicom International Cellular, S.A. for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
Interamérica, S. de R. L.Honduras
June 30, 2004

Exh 14.2-1

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of Registrant**

 

HInnovationInc., a Minnesota corporation

 

Subsidiary of HInnovation Inc.:

 

HInnovation (Beijing) Science and Technology, Inc.,incorporated under the laws of the People’s Republic of China

 

VitalImages Holding B.V., incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands

 

Subsidiaries of Vital Images Holding B.V.:

 

Vital Images Europe B.V.

Vital Images France Sarl

Vital Images Scandinavia AS

Vital Images Italy Srl

Vital Images Germany Gmbh

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7609

DONALD WAGNER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections; ARMOR HEALTH SERVICES, Health Provider; DILLMAN, Warden, C.W.C.C.; GARY L. BASS, Department of Corrections; FRED SCHILLING, Health Service Director; THOMAS PARHAM, Medical Director; CHERIAN JOSEPH, Doctor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00527) Submitted: January 18, 2008 Decided: February 11, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Wagner, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, Gauhar Rehman Naseem, DUANE, HAUCK & GNAPP, PC, Richmond, Virginia, Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Donald Wagner, Jr., timely appealed an order of the district court (1) denying Wagner’s motion for preliminary injunction and (2) ruling on various motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. In its order, the district court did not rule on all claims as to all defendants. With respect to the denial of preliminary injunctive relief, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wagner v. Johnson , No. 3:06-cv-00527 (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2007). The remainder of the district court’s order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Justin Alexander Larkins 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
# C_2011331EN.01001901.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne v OHIM — Natura Cosméticos (NATURAVIVA)

(Case T-107/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark NATURAVIVA - Earlier Community word mark VIVA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No similarity of the signs)

2011/C 331/34

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: K. Sandberg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Natura Cosméticos, SA (São Paulo, Brazil) (represented by: C. Bercial Arias, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 November 2009 (Case R 1558/2008-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne GmbH and Natura Cosméticos, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.

1

---
### [§2227. Renumbered §4601]
Eligible Countries

The Office of the United States Trade Representative has designated the countries as "eligible countries" for the 

USDA Rural Development Electric and Telecommunications Programs.

For Telecommunications Program borrowers, eligible countries are:

Canada Iceland Mexico

Chinese Taipei Israel Norway

European Union Japan Singapore

Hong Kong Liechtenstein

For Electric Program borrowers, eligible countries are:

Armenia Germany Netherlands

Aruba Greece New Zealand

Australia Guatemala Nicaragua

Austria Honduras Norway

Bahrain Hong Kong Oman

Belgium Hungary Panama

Bulgaria Iceland Peru

Canada Ireland Poland

Chile Israel Portugal

Chinese Taipei Italy Romania

Columbia Japan Singapore

Costa Rica Latvia Slovak Republic

Cyprus Liechtenstein Slovenia

Czech Republic Lithuania South Korea

Denmark Luxembourg Spain

Dominican Republic Malta Sweden

El Salvador Mexico Switzerland

Estonia Moldova Ukraine

Finland Montenegro United Kingdom

France Morocco

Only those products that are manufactured in the United States or an eligible country, and are substantially all 

from articles, materials, and supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States or eligible country 

may receive acceptance or conditional Acceptance from the Technical Standards Committees (Electric

Program). All other products may only receive technical acceptance.

View an updated list of Eligible Countries that was published in the Federal Register on June 27, 2014.

Notes:

Except as otherwise indicated, eligibility is for contracts covered under the World Trade Organization (WTO) 

Government Procurement Agreement (GPA), including applicable thresholds and General Notes contained in

U.S. Appendix 1 of the GPA. For services contracts, eligibility is subject in particular to General Note 8 of 

Appendix 1. The Government Procurement Agreement can be found at

http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc_e/gproc_e.htm.

Revised 03/18/2020
### §4717. Enforcement

#### (a) Regulations

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after the appointment and qualification of the Administrator, the Fund shall promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter.

#### (2) Regulations required

The regulations promulgated under paragraph (1) shall include regulations applicable to community development financial institutions that are not insured depository institutions to—

(A) prevent conflicts of interest on the part of directors, officers, and employees of community development financial institutions as the Fund determines to be appropriate; and

(B) establish such standards with respect to loans by a community development financial institution to any director, officer, or employee of such institution as the Fund determines to be appropriate, including loan amount limitations.

#### (b) Administrative enforcement

The provisions of this subchapter, and regulations prescribed and agreements entered into under this subchapter, shall be enforced under section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act [12 U.S.C. 1818] by the appropriate Federal banking agency, in the case of an insured community development financial institution. A violation of this subchapter, or any regulation prescribed under or any agreement entered into under this subchapter, shall be treated as a violation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act [12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §119, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2188.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 967, §2, 64 Stat. 873, which is classified generally to chapter 16 (§1811 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1811 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 119 of Pub. L. 103–325. Subsec. (c) of section 119 of Pub. L. 103–325 amended section 657 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Policy 
-  Statements 
-  PBGC Statement On Sears Bankruptcy Filing 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# PBGC Statement on Sears Bankruptcy Filing

October 15, 2018

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s mission is to protect the pension benefits of American workers and retirees in private sector pension plans. When pension plans terminate with insufficient funds, PBGC’s guarantee is critical to protecting the participants’ retirement security. See Questions and Answers for Participants in the Sears Holdings Corporation Pension Plans. 

PBGC has been working with Sears for several years to improve the funding of the company’s two defined benefit pension plans. PBGC expects that its guarantees would cover the vast majority of benefits earned under those Sears plans.  If circumstances require, we are prepared to step in and provide PBGC-guaranteed benefits. The plans, which cover about 90,000 workers and retirees, are underfunded by about $1.5 billion.

**About PBGC:**

PBGC protects the pension benefits of nearly 37 million Americans in private-sector pension plans. The agency operates two separate insurance programs — one covering pension plans sponsored by a single-employer and another covering multiemployer pension plans, which are sponsored by more than one employer and maintained under collective bargaining agreements. PBGC is currently responsible for the benefits of about 1.5 million people in failed pension plans. PBGC receives no taxpayer dollars. Its operations are financed by insurance premiums, investment income, and, for the Single-Employer Program, assets and recoveries from failed single-employer plans. For more information, visit PBGC.gov.
### §464. Checking against and withdrawal of reserve balance

The required balance carried by a member bank with a Federal reserve bank may, under the regulations and subject to such penalties as may be prescribed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, be checked against and withdrawn by such member bank for the purpose of meeting existing liabilities.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §19(f), formerly §19 (par. 9), 38 Stat. 270; Aug. 15, 1914, ch. 252, 38 Stat. 691; June 21, 1917, ch. 32, §10, 40 Stat. 239; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704; July 7, 1942, ch. 488, §3, 56 Stat. 648; renumbered §19(f), Pub. L. 89–597, §2(b), Sept. 21, 1966, 80 Stat. 824.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of subsec. (f), formerly ninth par., of section 19 of act Dec. 23, 1913, as redesignated by Pub. L. 89–597.

#### Amendments

1942—Act July 7, 1942, struck out proviso which prohibited making new loans or paying dividends until required balance was restored.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 127

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to prohibit the Secretary

of Agriculture from including any storage charges in the calculation

of loan deficiency payments or loans made to producers for loan commodities.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to prohibit

the Secretary of Agriculture from including any storage

charges in the calculation of loan deficiency payments

or loans made to producers for loan commodities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STORAGE CHARGES FOR LOAN COMMODITIES.

4 Subtitle C of the Agricultural Market Transition Act

5 (7 U.S.C. 7231 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end

6 the following:
2

•S 127 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 138. STORAGE CHARGES FOR LOAN COMMODITIES.

2 ‘‘In calculating the amount of a loan deficiency pay3 ment or loan made to a producer for a loan commodity

4 under this subtitle, the Secretary may not include any

5 storage charges incurred by the producer in connection

6 with the loan commodity.’’.

Æ
§ 2.37 Federal research facilities. Each Federal research facility shall establish an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee which shall have the same composition, duties, and responsibilities required of nonfederal research facilities by § 2.31 with the following exceptions: ( a ) The Committee shall report deficiencies to the head of the Federal agency conducting the research rather than to APHIS; and
( b ) The head of the Federal agency conducting the research shall be responsible for all corrective action to be taken at the facility and for the granting of all exceptions to inspection protocol.
Exhibit 10.1


 


West Coast Opportunity Fund, LLC


c/o
West Coast Asset Management, Inc.

2151 Alessandro Drive, Suite 100

Ventura, CA 93001


 


 


May 29, 2008


 


American Defense Systems, Inc.


230
Duffy Avenue, Unit C


Hicksville,
NY 11801


Attention:
Gary Sidorsky, CFO


 


Reference is made to the Securities Purchase
Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2008, by and among American Defense
Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)
and the investors listed on the Schedule of Buyers attached thereto (the “Buyers”) (the “Securities Purchase
Agreement”).  Any capitalized
term used herein and not defined shall have the meaning assigned to it in the
Securities Purchase Agreement.


 


The Company and West Coast Opportunity Fund, LLC, a
Buyer (“West Coast”), hereby agree
that the obligations in the Securities Purchase Agreement for West Coast and
the Company to consummate the Additional Closing shall be terminated and
West Coast and the Company not shall consummate any Additional Closing.


 


This
letter agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of New
York, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provision
or rule that would cause the application of the law of any jurisdiction
other than the State of New York.


 


On
or before 8:30 a.m., New York City time, on  the first (1st) Business Day following the date
hereof, the Company shall file a Current Report on Form 8-K describing the
terms of this letter agreement and attaching a copy of the form of this letter
agreement.


 

















 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Very
  truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  WEST COAST OPPORTUNITY FUND,

  LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Agreed to and Accepted by:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  AMERICAN DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
```

[House Document 110-23]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

110th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 110-23

 
NOTIFICATION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE REPUBLIC OF 
                                 KOREA

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE 
  REPUBLIC OF KOREA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2105(a)(1)(A) OF THE 
 TRADE ACT OF 2002 (PUB. L. 107-210), RECEIVED APRIL 1, 2007, PURSUANT 
                        TO 19 U.S.C. 2112(e)(1)

   April 16, 2007.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Appropriations and ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                         Washington, April 1, 2007.
Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Madam Speaker: Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) 
of the 2002, (Public Law 107-210; the ``Trade Act''), I am 
pleased to notify the Congress of my intention to enter into a 
free trade agreement with the Republic of Korea.
     The United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement (the 
``Agreement'') will generate export opportunities for U.S. 
farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, and service suppliers, 
promote economic growth and the creation of better paying jobs 
in the United States, and help American consumers save money 
while offering them greater choices. The Agreement will also 
further enhance the strong United States-Korea partnership, 
which has served as a force for stability and prosperity in 
Asia.
    Consistent with the Trade Act, I am sending this 
notification at least 90 days in advance of signing the 
Agreement. My Administration looks forward to working with the 
Congress in developing appropriate legislation to approve and 
implement this Agreement.

            Sincerely,
                                                    George W. Bush.

                                  

```
§ 351.7 Administration of certification service program. ( a ) The regulations in this part shall be administered by the circuit supervisor for the jurisdiction in which is located the certified plant or plants for which application for certification service is made, and such assistants as may be necessary will be assigned by the Administrator.
( b ) The Administrator may enter into a cooperative agreement with any recognized State for the conduct by State employees of any surveys, examinations, and other activities involved in the administration of the regulations in this part. However, certifications under these regulations may be issued only by Program employees, as provided in § 351.3.