# C_2012194EN.01001802.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Sviluppo Globale v Commission

(Case T-6/10) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Call for tenders - Support for the customs and tax authorities in Kosovo - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Act not amenable to review - Confirmatory act - Inadmissibility - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the call for tenders - Partial refusal of access - Exception concerning the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Inadequate statement of reasons)

2012/C 194/28

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sviluppo Globale GEIE (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Sciaudone, R. Sciaudone and A. Neri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and F. Erlbacher, acting as Agents, and P. Manzini, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 10 November 2009 rejecting the tender submitted by the consortium of which the applicant is a member in call for tenders EuropAid/127843/D/SER/KOS for the provision of support services to the customs and tax authorities in Kosovo (OJ 2009/S 4-003683) and, second, for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 26 November 2009 refusing the consortium access to certain documents relating to the call for tenders.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible in so far as it is directed against the Commission’s decision of 10 November 2009 rejecting the tender submitted by the consortium of which the applicant is a member in call for tenders EuropAid/127843/D/SER/KOS for the provision of support services to the customs and tax authorities in Kosovo. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible in so far as it is directed against the Commission’s decision of 10 November 2009 rejecting the tender submitted by the consortium of which the applicant is a member in call for tenders EuropAid/127843/D/SER/KOS for the provision of support services to the customs and tax authorities in Kosovo.

| 2. | Annuls the Commission’s decision of 26 November 2009 concerning access to certain documents relating to that call for tenders, in so far as it refuses to grant access, in the disclosed version of the evaluation report, to the scores awarded by the evaluation committee as set out on pages 3 to 5 of that report. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the Commission’s decision of 26 November 2009 concerning access to certain documents relating to that call for tenders, in so far as it refuses to grant access, in the disclosed version of the evaluation report, to the scores awarded by the evaluation committee as set out on pages 3 to 5 of that report.

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

| 4. | Dismissed the applicant’s application for the instigation of measures of inquiry. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Dismissed the applicant’s application for the instigation of measures of inquiry.

| 5. | Orders Sviluppo Globale GEIE to bear its own costs relating to the main proceedings and to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by the Commission in those proceedings. Orders the Commission to bear one quarter of its costs relating to the main proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Sviluppo Globale GEIE to bear its own costs relating to the main proceedings and to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by the Commission in those proceedings. Orders the Commission to bear one quarter of its costs relating to the main proceedings.

| 6. | Orders Sviluppo Globale to bear all the costs relating to the application for interim relief in Case T-6/10 R. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Orders Sviluppo Globale to bear all the costs relating to the application for interim relief in Case T-6/10 R.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---