alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Las subvenciones para la conexión de 

la comunidad proporcionan fondos para 

implementar banda ancha en zonas rurales 

elegibles donde todavía no existe suficiente 

banda ancha. Estas subvenciones también 

permiten el acceso gratuito a la banda ancha 

de la comunidad en instalaciones cruciales 

como escuelas públicas, bibliotecas y 

estaciones de servicios de emergencias.

Las subvenciones para la enseñanza a 

distancia y la telemedicina financian 

equipos de tecnología médica y educativa 

para apoyar la telemedicina y la enseñanza 

a distancia en las zonas rurales elegibles.

Los programas de préstamos, subvenciones 

y asistencia técnica en materia de 

telecomunicaciones del USDA están 

disponibles en zonas predominantemente 

rurales. Los requisitos de elegibilidad 

varían según el programa.

Puede obtener más información visitando 

nuestra página web sobre banda ancha 

en usda.gov/broadband. También puede 

comunicarse con el Representante General 

de Telecomunicaciones que atiende a su 

estado. Hay una lista disponible en este enlace: 

rd.usda.gov/contact-us/telecom-gfr.

Desarrollo Rural del USDA

Socio de América 

Rural ampliará 

el acceso 

a la banda ancha

Juntos, Estados Unidos Prospera

rd.usda.gov

1 (800) 670-6553 (gratuito)

El USDA es un proveedor, empleador y prestamista que ofrece 

igualdad de oportunidades.

PA-2238 | Septiembre 2022
El acceso asequible a banda 

ancha de alta velocidad es una 

necesidad moderna y vital para 

la prosperidad rural 

estadounidense. Apoya a las 

pequeñas empresas, a los 

fabricantes rurales y a la 

producción agrícola, y ayuda a 

nivelar las condiciones de los 

hogares, las escuelas, las 

empresas, los equipos de 

respuesta a emergencias y los 

centros de salud de las zonas 

rurales de los Estados Unidos.

Conectar y mantener conectados a 

los habitantes de las zonas 

rurales de Estados Unidos a un 

servicio de Internet confiable y 

de alta velocidad ayuda a llevar 

nuevas ideas e innovaciones al 

resto de nuestro país. Es por eso 

que los programas de Internet de 

alta velocidad son una parte 

importante de nuestra asociación 

con las comunidades rurales.

Programa de Telecomunicaciones

Préstamos para el acceso a la banda 

ancha rural: Financiamiento de préstamos 

directos y garantizados para ayudar a 

construir, mejorar y ampliar los servicios de 

banda ancha, incluidos los servicios de voz 

y video, en las zonas rurales que cumplen 

con los requisitos.

Préstamos y subvenciones ReConnect:

Los préstamos directos, las subvenciones y las 

combinaciones de préstamo y subvención proporcionan 

financiamiento para construir, mejorar y ampliar el 

servicio de banda ancha en zonas rurales y tribales que 

carecen de un servicio de banda ancha suficiente.

Préstamos para infraestructuras de 

telecomunicaciones: Financiamiento de préstamos 

directos y garantizados para ayudar a construir, mejorar 

y ampliar los servicios de telecomunicaciones, incluida 

la banda ancha, en las zonas rurales.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|Exactech International Corporation (Florida)          
|                                                      
|Exactech Asia, d/b/a Exactech Medical (Shanghai), Ltd.
|                                                      
|Exactech Taiwan (Taiwan), LTD                         
|                                                      
|Exactech (UK), Ltd.                                   
|                                                      
|Exactech KK (Tokyo)                                   
|                                                      
|Altiva Corporation (Delaware)                         
|                                                      
|France Medica                                         
|                                                      
|Exectech Deutschland, GmbH                            
|                                                      
|Exactech Iberica, S.A.                                
|                                                      
|Exactech International Operations, AG                 
|                                                      
|Brighton Partners, LLC
### §1324. Confirmation hearing

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) and after notice, the court shall hold a hearing on confirmation of the plan. A party in interest may object to confirmation of the plan.

(b) The hearing on confirmation of the plan may be held not earlier than 20 days and not later than 45 days after the date of the meeting of creditors under section 341(a), unless the court determines that it would be in the best interests of the creditors and the estate to hold such hearing at an earlier date and there is no objection to such earlier date.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2649; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §529, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 389; Pub. L. 99–554, title II, §283(x), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3118; Pub. L. 109–8, title III, §317, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 92.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

Any party in interest may object to the confirmation of a plan, as distinguished from merely rejecting a plan. An objection to confirmation is predicated on failure of the plan or the procedures employed prior to confirmation to conform with the requirements of chapter 13. The bankruptcy judge is required to provide notice and an opportunity for hearing any such objection to confirmation.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–8 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted "Except as provided in subsection (b) and after" for "After", and added subsec. (b).

1986—Pub. L. 99–554 struck out "the" after "object to".

1984—Pub. L. 98–353 struck out "the" before "confirmation of the plan".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.6 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service testing. A biological product shall with reasonable certainty yield the results intended when used as recommended or suggested in its labeling or proposed labeling prior to the expiration date. ( a ) The Administrator is authorized to cause a biological product, manufactured in the United States or imported into the United States, to be examined and tested for purity, safety, potency, or efficacy; in which case, the licensee or permittee shall withhold such product from the market until a determination has been made.
( b ) The final results of each test conducted by the licensee and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service shall be considered in evaluating a biological product. A serial or subserial which has been found unsatisfactory by a required test prescribed in a filed Outline of Production or Standard Requirement is not in compliance with the regulations and shall not be released for market.
[34 FR 18004, Nov. 7, 1969, as amended at 40 FR 45420, Oct. 2, 1975; 40 FR 53378, Nov. 18, 1975; 41 FR 6751, Feb. 13, 1976; 56 FR 66784, Dec. 26, 1991]
UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIX75HawthorneStreetSanFrancisco,CA94105.3901‘iv012010Dr.ChungS.Liu,DeputyExecutiveOfficerScienceandTechnologyAdvancementSouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict21865CopleyDriveDiamondBar,CA91765-4178DearDr.Liu:ThankyouforyoursubmissionoftheSouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict’s(SCAQMD)2009AnnualAirQualityMonitoringNetworkPlan.Wehavereviewedthesubmitteddocumentandhavefoundthatitmeetstheminimumrequirementssetforthunder40CFRPart58.10.Whilethisletterservesasofficialapprovaloftheannualnetworkplan,itdoesnotconstituteapprovalofthesystemmodificationsthatareproposedintheplanforthefuture.Wewillcontinuetoworkwithyourdistricttoreviewsystemchangesastheyproceed.WealsowanttothankyouforyourtimelysubmissionoftheSCAQMD’s2010MonitoringNetworkAssessmentReport,asrequiredunder40CFRPart58.10.Werecognizethatpreparingthenetworkassessmentwasasignificantprojectandweappreciateyoureffort.Weplanonprovidingfeedbacktoallagenciesonnetworkassessmentsduringthewinter2011.Enclosed,pleasefindourcommentsontheplan.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthisletterortheenclosedcomments,pleasefeelfreetocontactmeat(415)972-3851orKateHoagat(415)972-3970.Sincerely,MatthewLakin,ManagerAirQualityAnalysisOfficeAirDivisionEnclosurecc:Dr.PhilFine,SCAQMDDr.JasonLow,SCAQMDPnnsedonRecycledPaperCommentson2009DataYearNetworkPlanforSouthCoastAQMDPleaseupdatenextyear’sannualnetworkplantoreflectthefollowingcomments:1.ThegeneralprocessforsolicitingpubliccommentsontheAnnualMonitoringNetworkPlanisdescribedverywellonpageone,includingthedatesthatthedocumentswereavailable.Forfutureplans,pleaseindicatewhetherornotpubliccommentswerereceivedduringthistime2.Forallproposedchanges,whentheDistricthascompleteditsevaluation,pleasesubmitanyrequestwiththeappropriatedocumentationtoEPARegion9forourapproval.3.PagetenoutlinestherequirementsforPM25samplers.Thetablelistsalltherequiredmonitorstogether.Forfutureplans,pleaselistseparatelythevariousrequirements(FRM,continuous,collocated)andhowtheyaremet.4.PleasespecificallystatewhichsitesaremeetingthecollocationrequirementsforPM2.5andPM10.5.Table1onpage12doesnotlistaN02mOnitorattheRiversidesite,butoneisincluded•inthedetailedsiteinformationonpageB-236.Pleasechangethetableorthesitedescriptiontoreflectthemonitorscurrentlyatthesite.6.WhileAppendixBprovidesagoodoverviewofthemonitoringstationsinSCAQMD,someofthedetailedsiteinformationisincomplete.Thefollowinglistprovidesexamplesofinformationthatwasnotincludedorconsistentforallmonitors.Pleaseensurethatthesetablesarecompleteforyourfuturenetworkplans:i.Sitetype(SLAMS/SPMetc.)ii.ListFRMJFEM/non-FEMandmethodcodeforparticulatemonitors.iii.ListPOCforeachmonitoriv.DateofthelastAnnualPerformanceEvaluation,App.A,3.2.2(gaseousinstruments)v.Datesofthelasttwosemi-annualflowrateauditsforPMmonitors,AppA3.2.4and3.3.3(automatedandmanual)vi.Dateofthepastyear’sPM25-PEPandPb-PEPaudits,AppA3.2.7and4.3,2.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 81

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business

in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. TALENT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Small Business in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business

4 (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Commit5 tee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses,

8 not more than $4,399,035 for the One Hundred Sixth

9 Congress.
2

•HRES 81 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $2,094,868 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1999, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 2000; and

7 (2) not more than $2,304,167 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 2000, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 2001.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
# C_2007095EN.01002902.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/29

---

Action brought on 27 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-115/07)

(2007/C 95/54)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by B. Stromsky and M. Šimerdová, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/27/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/27/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 30 October 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 136, p. 34.

1

---
### §5625. Procedural provisions

An eligible entity desiring to participate in a program or obtain a grant under this subchapter shall submit an application to the Secretary, in such form and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title XII, §1207, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2132.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title XII of Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2129, known as the Improving Access to Mainstream Financial Institutions Act of 2010, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title XII to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.
### §1189. Filing of the plan

(a) Who May File a Plan.—Only the debtor may file a plan under this subchapter.

(b) Deadline.—The debtor shall file a plan not later than 90 days after the order for relief under this chapter, except that the court may extend the period if the need for the extension is attributable to circumstances for which the debtor should not justly be held accountable.

(Added Pub. L. 116–54, §2(a), Aug. 23, 2019, 133 Stat. 1081.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Aug. 23, 2019, see section 5 of Pub. L. 116–54, set out as an Effective Date of 2019 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Reusablelaunch vehicle programs and concepts**** 
SuDocNumber:TD4.87/2-4:
ItemNumber:0431-C-69(online)
CGPSystem Number:000600854
 
1998
1999
2000
 
 
 **
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1954-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]


New Jersey; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-1954-DR), dated February 4, 2011, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: February 11, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New Jersey is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of February 4, 2011.

    Atlantic and Cumberland Counties for Public Assistance.
    Atlantic and Cumberland Counties for emergency protective 
measures (Category B), including snow assistance, under the Public 
Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour period during or 
proximate to the incident period.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-4050 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### §§ 381.410-381.411 [Reserved]
#### § 111.45 [Reserved]
Exhibit 10.1


 





 


June 12,
2008


 


Mr. Carl
E. Berg


Berg &
Berg Enterprises, LLC


10050
Bandley Dr.


Cupertino,
CA  95014


 


Re:  Amended Covenants in Loan Agreements


 


Dear
Mr. Berg:


 


Valence Technology, Inc. (the “Borrower”) and
Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC, are currently parties to two loan
agreements: (a) the Loan Agreement dated July 17, 1990, as amended
(the “Original Amended Loan Agreement”) and (b) the Loan Agreement dated October 5,
2001 (the “New Loan Agreement”) (collectively the “Loan Agreements” or “Loans”).  This letter is to formally document our
agreement to amend the Loan Agreements to extend the maturity dates of the Loan
Agreements from September 30, 2008 to September 30, 2010.


 


This letter shall serve as Amendment No. 13 to
the Original Amended Loan Agreement and as Amendment No. 5 to the New Loan
Agreement.


 


Kindly indicate your acceptance of the amendments described
above by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter.


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  VALENCE
  TECHNOLOGY, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   /s/ Galen H. Fischer

  
	
   

  	
  Galen
  H. Fischer

  
	
   

  	
  VP
  of Finance

  



 


	
  ACCEPTED
  AND AGREED:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  BERG &
  BERG ENTERPRISES, LLC

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   /s/ Carl E. Berg

  	
   

  
	
  Carl
  E. Berg, Managing Member

  	
   

  



 


Valence Technology, Inc. 12201 Technology
Blvd. Suite 150, Austin, TX 78727


Tel: 512-527-2900, Fax: 512-527-2910
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 23, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-831 

Lower Tribunal No. 04-11813

________________

Brian Kuei Tung,

Appellant,

vs.

The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, 

Judge.

Law Office of Michael Garcia Petit, P.A, and Michael Garcia Petit, for 

appellant.

Sequor Law, P.A., and Edward H. Davis, Jr., Arnoldo B. Lacayo, Christopher 

A. Noel and Cristina Vicens Beard, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. v. Avila-Gonzalez, 164 so. 3d 

90, 93 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (stating that “Kozel[1] and its progeny are inapplicable” 

where the trial court’s findings are focused on the actions of a litigant rather than 

their counsel (citing Levine v. Del Am. Props., Inc., 642 So. 2d 32, 34 (Fla. 5th DCA 

1994))); Ledo v. Seavie Res., LLC, 149 So. 3d 707, 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“Since 

Ledo was sanctioned for his own failures to comply with court orders . . . Kozel has 

no application here.” (citation omitted)); Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944, 946 (Fla. 

1983)2 (“[T]o justify reversal [of a discretionary decision refusing to excuse 

noncompliance with court rules], it would have to be shown on appeal that the trial 

court clearly erred in its interpretation of the facts and the use of its judgment and 

not merely that the court, or another fact-finder, might have made a different factual 

determination.”).

1

 Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1993).

2

 Although Mercer predates Kozel, this Court has recognized its continued viability, 

particularly that it stands for the “proposition that [a] litigant’s conduct can support 

extreme sanctions.” Avila-Gonzalez, 164 So. 3d at 93 n.1.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report for fiscal year...**
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3551/2:

Item Number:0507-P-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000599179
 
2004 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014| 2015-18
 
March 10, 2020