alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001063018
<NAME>                        ISG RESOURCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1.00
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,879,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                       154,220
<INVENTORY>                                      2,730,662
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,885,459
<PP&E>                                          38,576,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,785,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 226,315,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,410,303
<BONDS>                                        100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               100
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,999,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,731,736
<SALES>                                         52,470,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,568,550
<CGS>                                           36,112,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,331,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,736,961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   116,164
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,521,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,989,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       464,834
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,524,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,524,964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Offers Grants to Bring Innovative Wastewater Systems to People in 

Underserved Rural Areas

Funding Will Help Find Solutions for Longstanding Wastewater Issues

WASHINGTON, May 30, 2023 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is offering grants to regional consortiums to find 

innovative solutions to longstanding wastewater issues in underserved rural areas.

The funding is being made available under the Technical Assistance and Construction for Innovative Regional 

Wastewater Treatment Solutions Grant Pilot Program. The program awards grants to regional consortiums that 

coordinate with universities, academic health and research institutes, or economic development entities to solve

untreated raw sewage issues with innovative technologies.

The grants may be used to study, design, or construct regional wastewater systems for historically impoverished 

communities that have had difficulty installing traditional treatment systems due to soil conditions.

The program’s primary focus will address issues related to raw sewage discharge for rural communities in the 

Mid-South areas experiencing persistent poverty. Persistent poverty areas include communities where at least 

20% of the people have been living in poverty over the past 30 years as measured by the 1990 census, 2000

census, and the 2007-2011 American Community Survey five-year average.

A minimum of $5.15 million in grant funding is available for fiscal year 2023. 

The funding may be used to provide wastewater technical assistance, conduct needs assessments, test 

wastewater options, assist with preliminary designs, develop regulatory guidance, and prepare applications for 

financial assistance. The grant funds also may be used to construct the identified solutions.

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help rural communities and people address climate change and environmental justice; advance racial justice;

implement place-based equity and opportunity, and create more and better market opportunities.

Applications must be submitted electronically on Grants.gov and received no later than 11:59 p.m. ET on July 

31, 2023.

Visit the Federal Register or program webpage for more information.

To subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.41 Calf safety test. The calf safety test provided in this section shall be conducted when prescribed in a Standard Requirement or in the filed Outline of Production for a product. ( a ) *Test procedure.* Each of two calves shall be injected with the equivalent of 10 doses of vaccine administered in the manner recommended on the label and observed each day for 21 days.
( b ) *Interpretation.* If unfavorable reactions attributable to the product occur in either of the calves during the observation period, the serial or subserial is unsatisfactory. If unfavorable reactions which are not attributable to the product occur, the test shall be declared a No Test and may be repeated: *Provided,* That, if the test is not repeated, the serial or subserial shall be declared unsatisfactory.
[39 FR 27428, July 29, 1974]
# C_2012058EN.01000802.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/8

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2012 — Hamberger Industriewerke v OHIM (Atrium)

(Case T-513/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark Atrium - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 58/14

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hamberger Industriewerke GmbH (Stephanskirchen, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmidpeter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially S. Schäffner and R. Manea and subsequently G. Schneider, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 August 2010 (Case R 291/2010-4), concerning an application for registration of the word mark Atrium as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Hamberger Industriewerke GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Hamberger Industriewerke GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.

1

---
### §1862. Amount of investment in bank service company

Notwithstanding any limitation or prohibition otherwise imposed by any provision of law exclusively relating to banks or savings associations, other than the limitation on the amount of investment by a Federal savings association contained in section 1464(c)(4)(B) of this title, an insured depository institution may invest not more than 10 per centum of paid-in and unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus in a bank service company. No insured depository institution shall invest more than 5 per centum of its total assets in bank service companies.

(Pub. L. 87–856, §2, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1132; Pub. L. 97–320, title VII, §709, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1541; Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2613(c), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–477; Pub. L. 109–351, title VI, §602(a), (b)(2), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1978, 1979.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–351 inserted "or savings associations, other than the limitation on the amount of investment by a Federal savings association contained in section 1464(c)(4)(B) of this title" after "relating to banks" and substituted "insured depository institution" for "insured bank" in two places.

1996—Pub. L. 104–208 substituted "company" for "corporation" in section catchline and "company" and "companies" for "corporation" and "corporations", respectively, in text.

1982—Pub. L. 97–320 substituted provisions relating to the maximum permissible amount of investment in a bank service corporation by an insured bank for provisions which read as follows:

"(a) No limitation or prohibition otherwise imposed by any provision of Federal law exclusively relating to banks shall prevent any two or more banks from investing not more than 10 per centum of the paid-in and unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus of each of them in a bank service corporation.

"(b) If stock in a bank service corporation has been held by two banks, and one of such banks ceases to utilize the services of the corporation and ceases to hold stock in it, and leaves the other as the sole stockholding bank, the corporation may nevertheless continue to function as such and the other bank may continue to hold stock in it."
# C_2012118EN.01002303.xml

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Iberdrola v Commission

(Case T-221/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid schemes allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of aid - Act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 118/39

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Iberdrola, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez-Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Iberdrola, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iberdrola, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED October
31, 2000.


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Apr-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               Oct-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,768
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,029
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,935
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,196)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,768
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,413)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)



</TABLE>
Form of Amendment to the Employment Agreements of Certain Officers



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FORM OF AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment (“Amendment”) is entered into and made effective as of June 16, 2008, by and between Motive, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“Employer”), and                  (“Employee”). 
  

	 	A.	Employer and Employee entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated                 
(the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the Agreement. 

  

	 	B.	Employer and Employee desire to amend the Agreement on the terms set forth herein. 

 Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by Employer and
Employee, Employer and Employee hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 
 1. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by
deleting the first sentence in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following: 
 This Agreement will be effective as of the
Effective Date, and will remain in effect until December 31, 2008, unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 4 or Section 5. 
 2. Except as modified hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and is unchanged. 
 3. This
Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one instrument. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer and Employee have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 
  

									
	 EMPLOYER:
  
 MOTIVE, INC.
	 		 		 	EMPLOYEE:
					
	By:	 	 	 		 		 	 
		 	 Alfred T. Mockett,
 Chairman and CEO
# C_2014167EN.01001401.xml

| 4.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/14

---

DECISION TO CLOSE THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AFTER WITHDRAWAL BY MEMBER STATE

State aid — Slovenia

(Articles 107 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Commission notice pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU — withdrawal of notification

State aid SA.33707 (2013/C) — regional aid to Revoz d.d.

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 167/07

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) of the TFEU, initiated on 2 July 2013 in respect of the measure referred to above, recording that Slovenia has withdrawn its notification on 18 July 2013.

---
# C_2011063EN.01003403.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/34

---

Action brought on 26 November 2010 — Labiri v CESE

(Case F-124/10)

2011/C 63/63

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vassiliki Labiri (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision to terminate without further action the administrative inquiry initiated as a result of the complaint of psychological harassment lodged by the applicant.

Form of order sought by the applicant

Form of order sought by the applicant

| — | Annul the decision of 18 January 2010 of the Secretary-General of the European Economic and Social Committee not to uphold any allegations against the applicant’s head of unit and to terminate the administrative inquiry initiated jointly by the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions as a result of the complaint of psychological harassment without further action; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 18 January 2010 of the Secretary-General of the European Economic and Social Committee not to uphold any allegations against the applicant’s head of unit and to terminate the administrative inquiry initiated jointly by the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions as a result of the complaint of psychological harassment without further action;

| — | order the European Economic and Social Committee to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Economic and Social Committee to pay the costs.

---
# C_2010274EN.01003302.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/33

---

Action brought on 3 August 2010 — Mantzouratos v European Parliament

(Case F-64/10)

()

2010/C 274/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Andreas Mantzouratos (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the European Parliament not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 in the 2009 promotion exercise and the decisions to promote to that grade officials with less merit points than the applicant.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the European Parliament not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 in the 2009 promotion exercise and the decisions to promote to that grade officials with less merit (points) than him; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Parliament not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 in the 2009 promotion exercise and the decisions to promote to that grade officials with less merit (points) than him;

| — | Order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
# C_2012217EN.01002002.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM — Garmo (GAZI Hellim)

(Case T-535/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark GAZI Hellim - Prior collective Community word mark HALLOUMI - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 217/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented initally by: C. Milbradt and H. Van Volxem, and subsequently by: C. Milbradt and A. Schwarz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Garmo AG (Stuttgart, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 September 2010 (Case R 1497/2009-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias and Garmo AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 September 2010 (Case R 1497/2009-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 September 2010 (Case R 1497/2009-4);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-126827) and Form F-3 (No. 333-188176) of GrupoTelevisa, S.A.B. of our report dated April 29, 2014 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F/A. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers, S.C. 

/s/ Jorge López deCárdenas Melgar 

C.P.C. Jorge López de Cárdenas Melgar 

Audit Partner 

México, D.F. 

May 06, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Actuate Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof, the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2006                              
|                                                     
|/s/ Peter I. Cittadini                               
|Peter I. Cittadini                                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer                
|(Principal Executive Officer)                        
|                                                     
|/s/ Daniel A. Gaudreau                               
|Daniel A. Gaudreau                                   
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and
|Chief Financial Officer                              
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)