alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SILVER CINEMAS, INTERNATIONAL,
INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 2000, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      19,685,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  864,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    393,997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,300,718
<PP&E>                                      77,870,734
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,142,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,423,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,475,150
<BONDS>                                     99,580,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 36,105,036
<COMMON>                                         1,420
<OTHER-SE>                                 (63,909,674)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               123,423,235
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,573,335
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,898,949
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,778,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (22,844,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (22,844,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (22,844,646)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 381.70 Ante mortem inspection; when required; extent. ( a ) An ante mortem inspection of poultry shall, where and to the extent considered necessary by the Administrator and under such instructions as he may issue from time to time, be made of poultry on the day of slaughter in any official establishment.
( b ) The examination and inspection of ratites will be on the day of slaughter, except: ( 1 ) When it is necessary for humane reasons to slaughter an injured animal at night or on a Sunday or holiday, and the FSIS veterinary medical officer cannot be obtained; or
( 2 ) In low volume establishments, when ante mortem inspection cannot be done on the day of slaughter, and the birds to be slaughtered have received ante mortem inspection in the last 24 hours, provided the establishment has an identification and control system over birds that have received ante mortem inspection.
[37 FR 9706, May 16, 1972, as amended at 66 FR 22906, May 7, 2001]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REGARDING FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2005, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Nello Gonfiantini III, Chairman of the Board, President and Secretary of Specialty Trust,
Inc. (the Company), hereby state, certify and attest in this written statement that: (a) The quarterly report of the Company filed on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (b) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Nello Gonfiantini III
    
    
    
    Dated this 13th of May, 2005Name:
    
    Nello Gonfiantini IIITitle :
    
    Chairman of the Board and President(Chief Executive Officer)
 This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section1350, subject to the knowledge
standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose. 31
----

**Exhibit        32**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350**

----

----

**CERTIFICATION          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906          OF THE          SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

*Family Healthcare Solutions,            Inc.*

| (1)                     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                    or 15(d)                    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)                     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                    material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    the                    Company. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Teodoro                  F. Franco L.                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Teodoro                  F. Franco L.** Sole                  Officer/Director |

----
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic Change Worksheet 

### QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F4 

### Date: December 17,2008 Revision 

### 1 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No.FAA-200~- 

# I I {'6 With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Pcrsoq. Contacted Date Boeing John SUlIImers April J,2009 

### ATA Mark Lopez October 19,2009

UNCONTROLLEO COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify That This isthe Correcl Revision Before Use
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS7979 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
### **CHAPTER 42—INTERSTATE LAND SALES**

Sec.
1701.
Definitions.
1702.
Exemptions.
1703.
Requirements respecting sale or lease of lots.
1704.
Registration of subdivisions.
1705.
Information required in statement of record.
1706.
Effective date of statements of record and amendments thereto.
1707.
Property report.
1708.
Certification of substantially equivalent State law.
1709.
Civil liabilities.
1710.
Court review of orders.
1711.
Limitation of actions.
1712.
Contrary stipulations void.
1713.
Additional remedies.
1714.
Investigations, injunctions, and prosecution of offenses.
1715.
Administration.
1716.
Unlawful representations.
1717.
Penalties for violations.
1717a.
Civil money penalties.
1718.
Rules, regulations, and orders.
1719.
Jurisdiction of offenses and suits.
1719a.
Repealed.
1720.
Authorization of appropriations.
§ 381.159 Poultry rolls. ( a ) Binders or extenders may be added in accordance with a regulation in this subchapter, in 9 CFR Chapter III, Subchapter E, or in 21 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter A or Subchapter B. In addition to the binders referred to in the preceding sentence, the following substances are permitted for use as binders in poultry rolls: transglutaminase enzyme at up to 65 ppm. When binding agents are added in excess of 3 percent for cooked rolls and 2 percent for raw rolls, the common name of the agent or the term “Binders Added” shall be included in the name of the product; e.g., “Turkey Roll-Gelatin Added.”
( b ) With respect to heat processed rolls, 2 percent or less liquid based on the weight of the finished product without liquid may remain with or be returned to product labeled as “(Kind) Roll.”
( c ) Heat processed rolls which have more than 2 percent liquid remaining with or returned to the product shall be labeled as “(Kind) Roll with Natural Juices.” If more than 2 percent of any liquid other than natural cookout juices is added, the product must be labeled to indicate that fact; e.g., “Turkey Roll with Broth.” Liquid shall not be returned or added to product within this paragraph graph in excess of the amount normally cooked out during preparation.
[37 FR 9706, May 16, 1972, as amended at 55 FR 34684, Aug. 24, 1990; 66 FR 54916, Oct. 31, 2001]
#### § 381.209 Returned United States inspected and marked poultry products; exemption.

Poultry products which have been inspected and passed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and are so marked, and are returned from foreign countries, may be imported if they are not adulterated or misbranded at the time of such return. Such products are exempted from further requirements under this part. Such returned shipments shall be reported to the Administrator by letter prior to arrival at the United States port of entry.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 170 ) ll-E-13 0 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/20088:42:09AM

Sheet 170of 264P. 2 

### A 945 2 

## 1 1 - E-/3 0

From : Date : Contact : Contac tRepor t Rober t Jemison , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Januar y 29,199 8 Mr . Joh n RMcCloske

y Company : Composite s USA , Inc . Telephon e Number : (410 ) 2S7-270 0 Fax Number : (410)287-522 2 Contac tSummary : Mr . Joh n R . McCloskey wa s contacte d o n behal f o f di e U.S . EP A t o updat e informatio n provide di n th e 199 3 EPA Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s Screenin g Survey submitte d b y Composite s USA , Inc . for

thei r faciht y located i n Bear , Delaware . I n respons e t o my question s Mr . McCloske y indicate dth e following : Th e facilit y ha s move dfromBear , Delawar e t o Northeast , Maryland . Th e facilit y make s conosio n resistan

t piping , ducting , an

dproces s vessel s for

th e chemical , pul p & paper , pharmaceutical an dsemiconductor industries . Th e facilit y use s th e han dlay-up proces s (bucket & brus h an d pressure-fe d rollers ) i n di e fabricatio n o f

certai n producb . Th

e polyester

and viny l ester

resin s applie d b y thes e fabricatio n device s contai n approximatel y 40 % HA P b y weigh t (o n average ) an d d o not contai n vapo r suppressants . Tb e only HAP presen t i n dies e resins i s styrene . Th e facilit y occasionall y add s smal l amount s o f

styren e t o thes e resin s an

dthes e small amour-i s ar

e reflecte d i n th e averag e HAP conten t mentione dabove . Th e facilit

y use s th e filamen

t windin g proces s i n th e fabricatio n o f certai n products . Th e polyester an dviny l ester

resin s use dduring thi s fabrication proces s contai n approximately 40 % HA P b y weigh t (o n average ) an

dd o no t contain vapor

suppressants . Th e onl y HA P presen t i n mes e resin s i s styrene . N o additional HA P i s adde d t o thes e resin s durin g th e fabricatio n process . Th e facilit y use s resi n transfe

r moldin g (RTM ) i n th e fabricatio n o f certai n products . Th e polyeste r an dviny l ester

resin s use ddurin g thi s fabrication proces s contai n approximatel y 40 % HA P b y weigh t (o n average ) an dd o no t

contain vapor

suppressants . Th e only HAP present i n thes e resin s i s styrene . N o additional HAP i s adde d t o thes e resin s durin g th e fabricatio n process . INFORMATIO N I S ACCURAT E 

# (^^^.00^

Z'd ZZZS L'SZ 01 7 I ON I VS RS3±ISOdWO O WOd d WZV-L 866L-20- 2
Date: 02-xx-2015

California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A

Rules that were Adopted or Amended by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and are Submitted as Revisions to the

California State Implementation Plan 

District

Rule

Number

Date Adopted 

or 

Amended

Title

Monterey Bay 

Unified APCD

1002 12/17/14 Transfer of Gasoline into 

Vehicle Fuel Tanks

(amended)

Monterey Bay 

Unified APCD

201 10/15/14 Sources Not Requiring 

Permits (amended)

San Joaquin Valley 

APCD

4905 01/22/15 Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type 

Central Furnaces (amended)

South Coast AQMD 1111 09/05/14 Reduction of NOx Emissions 

from Natural Gas-Fired, FanType Central Furnaces

(amended)

South Coast AQMD 1151 09/05/14 Motor Vehicle and Mobile 

Equipment Non-Assembly 

Line Coating Operations

(amended)

South Coast AQMD 1153.1 11/07/14 Emissions of Oxides of 

Nitrogen from Commercial 

Food Ovens (adopted)
California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A (continued)

Rules that were Adopted or Amended by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and are Submitted As Revisions to the

California State Implementation Plan 

District

Rule

Number

Date Adopted 

or Amended Title

Ventura County 

APCD

74.33 01/13/15 Liquefied Petroleum Gas 

Transfer or Dispensing

(adopted)

2
§ 439.50 Refusal of accreditation. Upon a determination by the FSIS Administrator (Administrator), a laboratory will be refused accreditation for the following reasons: ( a ) A laboratory will be refused accreditation for failure to meet the requirements of the ALP as stated in this part.
( b ) A laboratory will be refused accreditation if the laboratory or any individual or entity responsibly connected with the laboratory has been convicted of, or is under indictment for, or has charges on any information brought against them in a Federal or State court concerning any of the following violations of law: ( 1 ) Any felony.
( 2 ) Any misdemeanor based upon acquiring, handling, or distributing of unwholesome, misbranded, or deceptively packaged food or upon fraud in connection with transactions in food.
( 3 ) Any misdemeanor based upon a false statement to any governmental agency.
( 4 ) Any misdemeanor based upon the offering, giving or receiving of a bribe or unlawful gratuity.
( 5 ) Altering any official sample or analytical finding; or substituting any analytical result from any other laboratory and representing the result as its own.
# C_2011013EN.01003801.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/38

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 October 2010 — AB v Commission

(Case F-3/10) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Contract staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Complaint out of time - Manifest inadmissibility)

2011/C 13/73

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AB (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010, p. 69.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 38881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16010]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7937]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Regarding Warhol: Sixty Artists, Fifty Years''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Regarding Warhol: Sixty Artists, Fifty 
Years,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York from on or about 
September 11, 2012, until on or about December 31, 2012; then at the 
Andy Warhol Museum in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from on or about 
February 2, 2013 to on or about April 28, 2013; and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: June 25, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-16010 Filed 6-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# C_2007129EN.01000901.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias (Spain) lodged on 2 April 2007 — Club Náutico de Gran Canaria v Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias

(Case C-186/07)

(2007/C 129/14)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant: Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias

Defendant:

Applicant: Club Náutico de Gran Canaria

Applicant:

Question referred

Decides to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for the latter to give a preliminary ruling on the effects of its judgment of 7 May 1998 on Article 10.1.13 of Law 20/91 amending the fiscal aspects of the economic and fiscal rules applicable to the Canary Islands (1).

1

---

(1)  Case C-124/96 Commission v Spain, ECR [1998], p. I-2501.

1

Commission

Spain

---
Exhibit
23





Consent
of Auditors








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No.
33-87234) on Form S-8 of First Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated October 13,
2010 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which
appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Bancshares, Inc. as of and for the year
ended June 30, 2010.





/s/McGladrey
& Pullen, LLP





Kansas
City, Missouri


October
13, 2010
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

OFFICE OF
AIR AND RADIATION August 22, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Incorporation of NHTSA Docket

FROM: Robin Moran, Senior Policy Advisor

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

Because this rulemaking was conducted jointly by th e EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), EPA is hereb y incorporating by reference the docket compiled by NHTSA for its model year 2017-2025 Corp orate Average Fuel Economy standards for light duty motor vehicles (Docket # NHTSA 2010- 0131), where not already included in
EPA’s docket.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Announces Rural Cooperative Development Grant Awards 

WASHINGTON, Nov. 7, 2019 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Donald “DJ” LaVoy today announced funding to provide technical assistance and training to rural 

cooperatives. Through the Rural Cooperative Development Grants program, USDA is awarding a total of $5.8

million to 30 organizations in 21 states and the District of Columbia to help small businesses retain and create jobs in 

rural areas.

The awards announced today include the following:

• In Hawaii, the Kohala Center, Inc. will use a $200,000 grant to provide cooperative and business education 

and technical assistance in Hawaii's rural areas. Center staff will assist six groups, 75 businesses and 12 

cooperatives in rural Hawaii, in forming new entities, strengthening ag-related coops in the state, helping 

with feasibility studies, financial planning, and application assistance.

• The University of Wisconsin Board of Regents will receive a $199,799 grant to provide technical assistance 

to cooperatives in rural areas of Wisconsin and Minnesota. The primary objective is to improve economic 

conditions of rural areas through co-op development by: 1) providing training and resources to develop new 

co-ops; 2) fostering an environment to develop ventures in food systems, housing, childcare and health care;

3) increase the use of co-op development as a tool in succession planning and; 4) improve performance of 

established co-ops through training and education on co-op governance, finance and management. The 

project is expected to serve 170 groups, 202 businesses and 90 co-ops.

This program improves economic conditions in rural areas by helping individuals and businesses start, expand or 

improve rural cooperatives and other mutually-owned businesses. Under this program, nonprofit corporations and 

institutions of higher education are eligible to apply. Public bodies, for-profit business and individuals are not 

eligible. Grants may be used to develop and operate a rural cooperative development center that could provide the 

following technical assistance and other services to rural businesses: 

• Conducting feasibility studies; 

• Developing business plans; and 

• Providing leadership and operational improvement training 

#