alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Updated March 4, 2021) The * denotes the updated item.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA to Prioritize Projects Supporting Regional Economic and 

Community Development Planning

WASHINGTON, Jan. 11, 2021 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced that it is

seeking applications to fund projects that prioritize strategic investments that grow the economy and build 

prosperity in rural communities. 

The 2018 Farm Bill authorized USDA to make Strategic Economic and Community Development (SECD)

funding available to develop and implement strategic community investment plans. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2021, 

the covered Rural Development programs are:

• Community Facilities Direct Loan and Grant Program;

• Community Facilities Loan Guaranteed Program;

• Water and Waste Disposal Program Loan and Grant Program;

• Water and Waste Disposal Loan Guarantees;

• Business & Industry Loan Guarantees; and

• Rural Business Development Grants.

To apply for funding, applicants must meet covered program requirements and application deadlines and submit 

Form RD 1980-88 to the nearest USDA office. Applicants who are applying for SECD funding through a loan 

guarantee program may submit forms under the OneRD Guarantee Loan Initiative application guidelines.

* For additional information, see the Jan. 11, 2021, and March 4, 2021, Federal Register

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09591

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

09591\09591_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09591\09591_PARTA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09591\09591_PARTE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09591\09591_PARTH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09591\09591_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

09591\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09591_ Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09591\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09591_ ConfidentialBusinessInfoIndex_LP1.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09591\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09591_ Lost Pines 1 Plot_A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09591\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09591_ Lost Pines 1 Water Balance_A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09591\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09591_ Master Document List_LP1.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09591\09591_PlantID_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09591\09591_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TERRY BARNES, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-92-58, CA-97-284-5-BR) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 9, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied. 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying without prejudice his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Barnes, Nos. CR-92-58; CA-97-284-5-BR (E.D.N.C. June 12, 1997). * We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine month
period ending April 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ Lawrence Tierney
    --------------------
    Lawrence Tierney
    Principal Financial Officer
    June 4, 2007
# C_2019025EN.01003201.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Deutsche Telekom v Commission

(Case T-207/10) (1)

((State aid - Tax scheme allowing undertakings which are tax resident in Spain to amortise the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in undertakings which are tax resident abroad - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its partial recovery - Provision enabling the scheme to continue to apply in part - Application for a stay of execution - Continuing interest in bringing proceedings - Legitimate expectations - Precise assurances given by the Commission - Legitimacy of the expectation - Temporal scope of the legitimate expectation))

(2019/C 25/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Telekom AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: initially, A. Cordewener and J. Schönfeld, and, subsequently, J. Schönfeld, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially B. Martenczuk, T. Maxian Rusche and C. Urraca Caviedes, and, subsequently, T. Maxian Rusche and C. Urraca Caviedes, and, finally, T. Maxian Rusche, C. Urraca Caviedes and K. Blanck-Putz, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Ebro Foods, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: initially, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, and, subsequently, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers), Banco Santander, SA (Santander, Spain) (represented by: initially, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, and, subsequently, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers), Iberdrola, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: initially, J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, and, subsequently, J. Ruiz Calzado, J. Domínguez Pérez and S. Völcker, lawyers) and Telefónica, SA (Madrid) (represented by: initially, J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, and, subsequently, J. Ruiz Calzado, J. Domínguez Pérez and S. Völcker, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Article 1(2) and (3) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Deutsche Telekom AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deutsche Telekom AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

---
§ 314.1 Disposition of condemned products at official establishments having tanking facilities; sealing of tanks. ( a ) Carcasses, parts of carcasses, and other products condemned at official establishments having facilities for tanking shall, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section or elsewhere in this part, be disposed of by tanking as follows: ( 1 ) The lower opening of the tank shall first be sealed securely by a Program employee, except when permanently connected with a blow line; then the condemned products shall be placed in the tank in his presence, after which the upper opening shall also be sealed securely by such employee, who shall then see that the contents of the tank are subjected to sufficient heating for sufficient time to effectively destroy the contents for human food purposes.
( 2 ) The use of equipment such as crushers or hashers for pretanking preparation of condemned products in the inedible products department has been found to give inedible character and appearance to the material. Accordingly, if condemned products are so crushed or hashed, conveying systems, rendering tanks, and other equipment used in the further handling of crushed or hashed material need not be locked or sealed during the tanking operations. If the rendering tanks or other equipment contain condemned material not so crushed or hashed, the equipment shall be sealed as prescribed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. If the crushed or hashed material is not rendered in the establishment where produced, it shall be denatured as provided for in § 314.3 before leaving such establishment.
( b ) The seals of tanks shall be broken only by a Program employee and only after the contents of the tanks have been treated as provided in paragraph (a) of this section. The rendered fat derived from condemned material shall be held until a Program employee shall have had an opportunity to determine whether it conforms with the requirements of this section. Samples shall be taken by Program employees as often as is necessary to determine whether the rendered fat is effectually denatured.
( c ) Carcasses of animals condemned under § 309.3 of this subchapter may be disposed of as provided in § 314.3, in lieu of tanking, with the approval of the inspector.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.32 Can the Secretary decline an Indian tribe or tribal organization's proposed successor annual funding agreement?

No. If it is substantially the same as the prior annual funding agreement (except for funding increases included in appropriations acts or funding reductions as provided in section 106(b) of the Act) and the contract is with DHHS or the BIA, the Secretary shall approve and add to the contract the full amount of funds to which the contractor is entitled, and may not decline, any portion of a successor annual funding agreement. Any portion of an annual funding agreement proposal which is not substantially the same as that which was funded previously (e.g., a redesign proposal; waiver proposal; different proposed funding amount; or different program, service, function, or activity), or any annual funding agreement proposal which pertains to a contract with an agency of DOI other than the BIA, is subject to the declination criteria and procedures in subpart E. If there is a disagreement over the availability of appropriations, the Secretary may decline the proposal in part under the procedure in subpart E.
### §§1017 to 1019. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–353, §3(b), Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 773

Section 1017, acts May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title II, §33, 48 Stat. 49; June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VIII, §80(a), 48 Stat. 273, authorized Land Bank Commissioner to make rules and regulations and to appoint, employ and fix compensation of officers, employees, attorneys and agents.

Section 1018, acts May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title II, §34, 48 Stat. 49; June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VIII, §80(a), 48 Stat. 273, related to making available to Land Bank Commissioner of facilities of Federal land banks and Federal land bank associations.

Section 1019, act May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title II, §35, 48 Stat. 49, prescribed a penalty of not more than $1,000 fine or six months' imprisonment or both for false representations in obtaining loan.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Strategic andannual operating plan**** 
SuDocNumber: HE 20.3052/3:
ItemNumber:0506-G-05(online)
CGPSystem Number: 000600192
 
Current
 
Previous:
 
2002
2003
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016-2017**
# C_2007056EN.01004202.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/42

---

Action brought on 11 December 2006 — Speiser v Parliament

(Case F-146/06)

(2007/C 56/80)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Michael Alexander Speiser (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: F. Theumer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the defendant's decision of 11 September 2006 (No 115521) dismissing the applicant's complaint of 31 March 2006 pursuant to Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations in respect of payment of the expatriation allowance; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the defendant's decision of 11 September 2006 (No 115521) dismissing the applicant's complaint of 31 March 2006 pursuant to Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations in respect of payment of the expatriation allowance;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations with retroactive effect from 3 October 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations with retroactive effect from 3 October 2005;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, who started working as a 'temporary agent' for the EPP-ED Group on 3 October 2005, is challenging the rejection of his application for payment of the expatriation allowance. He claims that he submitted all the documents and information necessary for claiming the allowance and that he satisfies all the criteria.

---
#### § 351.1 Meaning of words.

Words used in this part in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.
§ 2.33 Attending veterinarian and adequate veterinary care. ( a ) Each research facility shall have an attending veterinarian who shall provide adequate veterinary care to its animals in compliance with this section: ( 1 ) Each research facility shall employ an attending veterinarian under formal arrangements. In the case of a part-time attending veterinarian or consultant arrangements, the formal arrangements shall include a written program of veterinary care and regularly scheduled visits to the research facility;
( 2 ) Each research facility shall assure that the attending veterinarian has appropriate authority to ensure the provision of adequate veterinary care and to oversee the adequacy of other aspects of animal care and use; and
( 3 ) The attending veterinarian shall be a voting member of the IACUC; *Provided, however,* That a research facility with more than one Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) may appoint to the IACUC another DVM with delegated program responsibility for activities involving animals at the research facility.
( b ) Each research facility shall establish and maintain programs of adequate veterinary care that include: ( 1 ) The availability of appropriate facilities, personnel, equipment, and services to comply with the provisions of this subchapter;
( 2 ) The use of appropriate methods to prevent, control, diagnose, and treat diseases and injuries, and the availability of emergency, weekend, and holiday care;
( 3 ) Daily observation of all animals to assess their health and well-being; *Provided, however,* That daily observation of animals may be accomplished by someone other than the attending veterinarian; and *Provided, further,* That a mechanism of direct and frequent communication is required so that timely and accurate information on problems of animal health, behavior, and well-being is conveyed to the attending veterinarian;
( 4 ) Guidance to principal investigators and other personnel involved in the care and use of animals regarding handling, immobilization, anesthesia, analgesia, tranquilization, and euthanasia; and
( 5 ) Adequate pre-procedural and post-procedural care in accordance with current established veterinary medical and nursing procedures.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0579-0036 and 0579-0486) [54 FR 36147, Aug. 31, 1989, as amended at 88 FR 10713, Feb. 21, 2023]
**Bartlett Subsection**  **05 (16).**  **Permits and Fees**

**- Reporting Requirements.** 

(a) Except as provided below, each permitted stationary air pollution source must submit to the Department an annual report that establishes the amount of actual emissions of each regu lated pollutant, including carbon monoxide, for that source. This report will be for the emissions of that source that occurred during the calendar year starting in 1991 and continuing for succeeding years thereafter. The Department may request, and the air pollution source shall provide, additional information on the emissions data submitted when the Department determines, the data previously provided is inadequate to establish the actual type or amount of emissions from the source subject to fees.

(b) Not including air toxics as they are defined in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and the amendments thereto, if the source emits fewer than twenty five (25) tons of actual emissions of pollutant during a year, it may at its option, use as the actual em issions figure, its permitted pollutant levels where available and known. If the source is a "major source" under the air toxics provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 it too must calculate its actual emission of regulated pollutants.

Failure to provide, on a timely basis, any additional information requested shall be considered failure to pay the fees.

05 (16), p. 1
§ 500.4 Withholding action or suspension with prior notification. FSIS may take a withholding action or impose a suspension after an establishment is provided prior notification and the opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance because: ( a ) The HACCP system is inadequate, as specified in § 417.6 of this chapter, due to multiple or recurring noncompliances;
( b ) The Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures have not been properly implemented or maintained as specified in §§ 416.13 through 416.16 of this chapter;
( c ) The establishment has not maintained sanitary conditions as prescribed in §§ 416.2-416.8 of this chapter due to multiple or recurring noncompliances;
( d ) The establishment did not collect and analyze samples for *Escherichia coli* Biotype I and record results in accordance with § 310.25(a) or § 381.94(a) of this chapter;
( e ) The establishment did not meet the *Salmonella* performance standard requirements prescribed in § 310.25(b) or § 381.94(b) of this chapter.
# C_2010246EN.01002002.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van Koophandel te Dendermonde (Belgium) lodged on 2 June 2010 — Wamo BVBA v JBC NV and Modemakers Fashion NV

(Case C-288/10)

()

2010/C 246/34

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van Koophandel te Dendermonde

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Wamo BVBA

Defendants:

| | JBC NV |
| --- | --- |

JBC NV

| | Modemakers Fashion NV |
| --- | --- |

Modemakers Fashion NV

Question referred

Question referred

Does Directive 2005/29/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices preclude a national provision such as that laid down in Article 53 of the Wet van 14 juli 1991 betreffende de handelspraktijken en de voorlichting en bescherming van de consument (Law of 14 July 1991 on commercial practices and consumer information and protection, ‘WHP’) which prohibits announcements of price decreases and suggestions of such decreases during defined periods?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22).

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.5 General testing. ( a ) No biological product shall be released prior to the completion of tests prescribed in a filed Outline of Production or Standard Requirements for the product to establish the product to be pure, safe, potent, and efficacious.
( b ) Tests of biological products shall be observed by a competent employee of the manufacturer during all critical periods. A critical period shall be the time when certain specified reactions must occur in required tests to properly evaluate the results.
( c ) Records of all tests shall be kept in accordance with part 116 of this chapter. Results of all required tests prescribed in the filed Outline of Production or the Standard Requirements for the product shall be submitted to Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Blank forms shall be furnished upon request to Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
( d ) When the initial or any subsequent test is declared a No Test, the reasons shall be reported in the test records, the results shall not be considered as final, and the test may be repeated. When a test is declared satisfactory, the test designation is considered to be a final conclusion. When a test is declared unsatisfactory, the test designation is considered to be a final conclusion. When the initial or any subsequent test is declared inconclusive, the reasons shall be reported in the test records, the result shall not be considered as final, and the test may be repeated as established in the filed Outline of Production or Standard Requirement. If a test is designated inconclusive or No Test and the biological product is not further tested, the test designation of unsatisfactory is the final conclusion.
( e ) When new test methods are developed and approved by Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, biological products tested thereafter shall be evaluated by such methods, and if not found to be satisfactory when so tested shall not be released.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0059) [34 FR 18004, Nov. 4, 1969, as amended at 39 FR 25463, July 11, 1974; 40 FR 45420, Oct. 2, 1975; 40 FR 46093, Oct. 6, 1975; 41 FR 6751, Feb. 13, 1976; 48 FR 57473, Dec. 30, 1983; 56 FR 66784, Dec. 26, 1991; 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014]