alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5240]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7358]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Double Sexus''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Double Sexus,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Wexner Center for the Arts at 
The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, from on or about March 26, 
2011, until on or about July 31, 2011, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 2, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-5240 Filed 3-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
§ 51.28 Moving goats, sheep, and horses to be destroyed. Goats, sheep, and horses to be destroyed because of brucellosis must be accompanied by a permit and either: ( a ) Accompanied directly to slaughter by an APHIS or State representative; or
( b ) Moved in vehicles closed with official seals applied and removed by an APHIS representative, State representative, accredited veterinarian, or an individual authorized for this purpose by an APHIS representative. The official seal numbers must be recorded on the accompanying permit.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0185)
Copyrighted page/s removed. Copyrighted material is not available in 

Regulations.gov since it may not be reproduced without consent of 

the copyright holder. 

Contact the EPA Docket Center’s Public Reading Room to view 

or receive a copy of this document. 

Requests for copies may be made as follows: 

In person/writing: 

Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center 

1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 

Washington, DC. 20004 

Telephone: 

202-566-1744 

Fax: 

202-566- 9744 

Email: 

docket-customerservice@epa.gov
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT TO NOTE




          This First Amendment to Note (the “First Amendment”) is made as of this 30 day of April, 2008
by and between Bank of America, N.A. (the “Bank”) having an office located at 100 Federal Street,
Boston, Massachusetts 02110 and iRobot Corporation (the “Borrower”), a Delaware corporation having
an office at 63 South Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803 to that certain Note dated June 5,
2007 executed by the Borrower in favor of the Bank (the “Note”). Any capitalized terms not
otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings designated in the Note.




W I T N E S S E T H:




          WHEREAS, the Borrower did on June 5, 2007 execute, seal and deliver to the Bank the Note; and




          WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the Bank increase the maximum principal of the Note;




          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and
valuable consideration, receipt of whereof is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed by and
between the Borrower and the Bank as follows:





	1.	 	The Note is hereby amended by replacing where applicable the references to “Thirty Five
Million Dollars” and “$35,000,000.00” with “Forty Five Million Dollars” and “$45,000,000.00”.
	 
	2.	 	The Note, as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect and all terms hereof are
hereby ratified and confirmed by the Borrower. Except for specifically provided herein, all
other terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect.
	 
	3.	 	The Borrower by its execution of this First Amendment in the space provided below,
represents, warrants and agrees that the Borrower has no claims, defenses, counterclaims or
offsets against the Bank in connection with the Note or any of the other documents executed in
connection therewith and, to the extent that any such claim, defense, counterclaim or offset
may exist, the Borrower by its execution of this First Amendment in the space provided below,
hereby affirmatively WAIVES and RELEASES the Bank from same.
	 
	4.	 	This First Amendment shall take effect as a sealed instrument under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts as of the date first above written.
	 
	5.	 	Any and all references to the Note and any instrument previously and now hereafter executed
by the Borrower shall be deemed to refer to the Note as amended by this





-1-









 






First Amendment and
any future amendments hereafter entered into between the Borrower and the Bank.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as of the date and
year first above written as a sealed instrument.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	WITNESS:	 	 	 	iROBOT CORPORATION
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Paul Tavalone

	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Geoffrey P. Clear	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Sr. VP and CFO	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Richard MacDonald	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Vice President	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 






-2-
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Safer Medical of Montana and 

George Ackerson 

Complainants, 

v. 

City of Fort Benton, Montana and 

Chouteau County, Montana 

Joint Airport Board, 

Respondents. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FAA Docket No. 16-15-12 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above 

referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for 

Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 Code of Federal Regulations 

(CFR) Part 16. 

Additional time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete consideration of the 

matters before the agency. 

Accordingly, pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's 

Detennination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to February 9, 2017. 

f;)-0--d,o/(o 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 9, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy of the foregoing Order 

addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainants 

Adrian A. Miller 

Holland & Hart LLP 

401 North 31st Street 

Suite 1500 

P.O. Box 639 

Billings, MT 59103-0639 

aamiller@hollandhart.com 

FOR RESPONDENTS 

City of Fort Benton 

Brian Lilletvedt 

Bosch, Kuhr, Dugdale, Martin, and Kaze, LLP 

335 Fourth Avenue 

P.O. Box 7152 

Havre. MT 59501 

blilletvedt@bkdlaw .org 

Chouteau County 

Mitchell A. Young 

Montana Association of Counties 

Defense Services 

Mitchell A. Young 

2717 Skyway Drive, Suite F 

Helena, MT 59602 

myoung@mtcounties.org 

Hand-Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) 

FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0-1 00) 

FAAANMRegion e~ 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

2
**Teaching PacketforGradesK—3PDFVersion
**PDF  format reproduces the look of the printed  publication. To view and printthe PDF version, you must obtain and install theAcrobat®  Reader,available at no charge from Adobe Systems. Note that PDF files tend to be of relatively largesize. Downloading such files from the Internet to your computer via modem may take up toseveral minutes.  Additionally, the quality of illustrations in printed PDF documents willgenerally be lower than that of the original paper document.**

Chapter 1Chapter 2Chapter 3Chapter 4Chapter 5Teacher GuideMultimedia ResourcesPosterEvaluation FormReturn to "Exploring Caves" HTML Version

The poster is available for purchase through the NationalMapping Program.
| Go to the top of the page | Go to the table of contents | Return to "Exploring Caves" home page |

MappingWaterBiologyGeologyU. S. Geological SurveyDepartment of the Interior

*This online edition contains full text from the original publication. Some of theimages have been modified or added to improve the scientific visualization ofinformation.  This document has undergone offical review and approval for publicationsas established by National Mapping Division, U. S. Geological Survey.*

U.S. Department of the Interior —     U.S. Geological Survey — 509     National Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA **URL:***http://     erg.usgs.gov    /isb/pubs/teachers-packets/exploringcaves/pdfindex.html* — **Contact:**http://erg.usgs.gov/feedback.html**Page Maintainer:** USGS Eastern Region Geography **Last modified:**     14:27:03 Tue 31 Dec 2002    — USGS     Privacy Policy and Disclaimers — Accessibility**
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Reports to Congress 
                      -  Congressional Testimony 
                      -  Speeches 

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# January 18, 2024 - Congressional Testimony on Improving Safety and Expanding U.S. Pipeline Infrastructure

Written Testimony for Tristan Brown House EC Hearing.pdf (289.57 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
### §635i–7. Cooperation on export financing programs

The Bank shall, subject to appropriate memoranda of understanding—

(1) provide complete and current information on all of its programs and financing practices to—

(A) the Small Business Administration and other Federal agencies involved in promoting exports and marketing export financing programs; and

(B) State and local export financing organizations that indicate a desire to participate in export promotion; and

(2) consistent with the provisions of section 4721(f)(2) of title 15, undertake a program to provide training for personnel designated in such memoranda with respect to such financing programs.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 341, §13, formerly §19, as added and renumbered §13, Pub. L. 102–429, title I, §§115, 121(c)(7), Oct. 21, 1992, 106 Stat. 2196, 2199.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 13 of act July 31, 1945, ch. 341, was classified to section 635i–1 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–429, §121(c)(1).
### §1004. Penalties

Whoever secures or attempts to secure the exemption from toll provided for in sections 1002 to 1004 of this title or an authorization referred to in section 1003 of this title, knowing that he is not entitled thereto, and whoever signs or issues any such authorization certifying to such right of exemption, knowing that such right does not exist, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $100 or by imprisonment for not more than ten days, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

(Mar. 14, 1944, ch. 92, §3, 58 Stat. 116.)
#### § 9405.6 Discretionary release of exempt records.

The Commission may, in its discretion, release requested records despite the applicability of the exemptions in § 9405.5, if it determines that it is in the public interest and that the rights of third parties would not be prejudiced. The Executive Director will have the authority to determine that requested records may be released despite otherwise applicable exemptions.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

August 25 , 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00450

- CV

IN RE OILFIELD SPECI ALTIES, LLC , Appellant

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial C o urt Cause No. 20 18

- 35023

MEMO RANDUM OPINION

Relator Oil field Special ties, LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus in

this Co urt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition

, relator asks this court to compel the Hon o rable Jeralynn Manor, presiding judge of the 80 th District Court of Harris Co unt y, to vacate the trial court ’ s order signed May 10, 2021, vacating a previous order of the tr ial court releasing fund s
fr om the registry of the trial court.2

Relat or has not e stabl ished it is entitled to manda m us reli e f. Accordingly, we deny relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Pa nel consist s of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-50766

Summary Calendar

IRMA ROSAS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

SAN ANTONIO HOUSING AUTHORITY, also known as SAHA; NRP 

GROUP, L.L.C.; UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD; TEXAS RIOGRANDE 

LEGAL AID, INCORPORATED; BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS; CITY OF SAN 

ANTONIO, 

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:18-CV-537

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons explained by that 

court. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 2, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-50766 Document: 00515061299 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/02/2019
Exhibit 12.1
  
                       WALDEN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED
                 FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS (2)
                              (Dollars in Thousands)
                                              
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    For the Period
                                                Year Ended          February 9, 1994
                                               December 31,        (Commencement of
                                              --------------      Operations) through
                                              1996      1995        December 31, 1994
                                              ----      ----        -----------------  

  <S>                                       <C>       <C>                 <C>
  Income before extraordinary item. . . . . $19,122   $10,685             $ 5,356
  Add:
   Interest on indebtedness . . . . . . . .  20,573    17,111               6,288
   Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     916       900                 371
                                            -------   -------             -------
     Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40,611   $28,696             $12,015
  
  Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends:
   Interest on indebtedness . . . . . . . . $20,573   $17,111             $ 6,288
   Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     916       900                 371
                                            -------   -------             -------
     Fixed charges. . . . . . . . . . . . .  21,489    18,011               6,659
   Add:
     Preferred stock dividends (1). . . . .   4,092       922                 -- 
                                            -------   -------             -------
        Combined fixed charges and
          preferred stock dividends . . . . $25,581   $18,933             $ 6,659
                                            =======   =======             =======

  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges. . . .   1.89x     1.59x               1.80x
  
  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
    preferred stock dividends . . . . . . .   1.59x     1.52x               1.80x
  
</TABLE>

    (1)  Includes preferred stock dividends on convertible equity
         securities and preferred stock.
  
    (2)  Computation of the ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
         and preferred stock dividends has not been provided for Walden
         Predecessors because the capital structure has changed
         substantially since the Company's formation and the
         information relating to Walden Predecessors would be
         meaningless.
§ 124.33 Standard of due diligence. ( a ) In determining the due diligence of an applicant, APHIS will examine the facts and circumstances of the applicant's actions during the regulatory review period to determine whether the applicant exhibited the degree of attention, continuous directed effort, and timeliness as may reasonably be expected from, and are ordinarily exercised by, a person during a regulatory review period. APHIS will take into consideration all relevant factors, such as the amount of time between the approval of an experimental use permit and licensure of the veterinary biological product.
( b ) For purposes of this Part, the actions of the marketing applicant shall be imputed to the applicant for patent term restoration. The actions of an agent, attorney, contractor, employee, licensee, or predecessor in interest of the marketing applicant shall be imputed to the applicant for patent term restoration.
#### § 700.319 Final agency action.

Within 30 (thirty) days after receipt of the Presiding Officer's decision, the Commission shall affirm or reverse the decision and issue its final agency action upon the application in writing; *Provided,* that in the event one Commissioner sits as the Presiding Officer, the final agency action shall be determined by the remaining Commissioners and such other person as they may designate who did not so preside over the hearing. Such decisions shall be communicated in writing to the Applicant by certified mail.
§ 2.27 Notification of change of operation. ( a ) A registrant shall notify the Deputy Administrator by certified mail of any change in the name, address, or ownership, or other change in operations affecting its status as an exhibitor, carrier, or intermediate handler, within 10 days after making such change.
( b ) ( 1 ) A registrant which has not used, handled, or transported animals for a period of at least 2 years may be placed in an inactive status by making a written request to the Deputy Administrator a registrant shall notify the Deputy Administrator in writing at least 10 days before using, handling, or transporting animals again after being in an inactive status.
( 2 ) A registrant which goes out of business or which ceases to function as a carrier, intermediate handler, or exhibitor, or which changes its method of operation so that it no longer uses, handles, or transports animals, and which does not plan to use, handle, or transport animals again at any time in the future, may have its registration canceled by making a written request to the Deputy Administrator. The former registrant is responsible for reregistering and demonstrating its compliance with the Act and regulations should it start using, handling, or transporting animals at any time after its registration is canceled.
[54 FR 36147, Aug. 31, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 62926, Nov. 10, 1998; 85 FR 28797, May 13, 2020]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DENNIS CHAN LAI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-16406

D.C. Nos. 3:07-cv-02155-SC

3:87-cr-00359-SC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Samuel Conti, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Dennis Chan Lai appeals pro se from the district court’s

order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as second or successive. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

NOV 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-16406

The record reflects that Lai had filed a section 2255 motion on November

11, 1995, which this court rejected on the merits. Lai subsequently filed another

section 2255 motion on April 13, 2007. The district court properly dismissed that

motion because Lai had not obtained an order from this Court authorizing it to

consider the motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); Cooper v. Calderon, 274

F.3d 1270, 1274 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam).

To the extent Lai is applying for an order authorizing a second or successive

petition, such request is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(C).

We construe Lai’s additional arguments as a motion to expand the certificate

of appealability. So construed, the motion is also denied. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e);

see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.
## SUBTITLE II—PERSONNEL

Chap.
Sec.
19.
Coast Guard Academy
1901
21.
Personnel; Officers
2101
23.
Personnel; Enlisted
2301
25.
Personnel; General Provisions
2501
27.
Pay, Allowances, Awards, and Other Rights and Benefits
2701
29.
Coast Guard Family Support, Child Care, and Housing
2901

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §109(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4211, inserted subtitle II designation and heading and added items for chapters 19 to 29.