alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### F. D. McKendall Lumber Co. *vs.*Delfino DiDonato *et al.*

JULY 20, 1951.

Present : Flynn, C. J., Capotosto, Baker, Condon and O’Connell, JJ.

O’Connell, J.

This is a petitioner’s appeal from a final decree of the superior court establishing a lien in its favor in the sum of $704.25. The principal grounds of such appeal are that the decree is against the law, the evidence and the weight thereof; that it should have awarded pétitioner the full amount of its claim, $1648.64; and that it does not do justice between the parties.

The evidence shows that respondents entered into a contract in December 1947 with Bernard McNiff, a contractor, for the construction of a house on Archer avenue in the town of Johnston in this state. The price agreed upon was $6000. The contractor collected $4935 from respondents and then defaulted on his contract. It is alleged that material for the construction of the house was furnished by petitioner and that the contractor has paid to it only $1000, leaving a balance of $1648.64 as claimed in the petition. All necessary steps have been taken as a condition precedent to the filing in the superior court of the petition to enforce the lien.

It appears in evidence that some of the delivery slips were signed by McNiff, others by one Dersosiers, whose relation to the parties is not disclosed by the evidence, *402and many others bore no signatures. The office manager of petitioner explained that sometimes slips were not signed because there was no one on the job to sign them and .sometimes the contractor or workers were on the roof and did not want to come down to the ground to sign them.

*Albert N. McKendall,*for petitioner.

*Luigi Capasso,*for respondents.

While the contractor, who testified for petitioner, stated that the materials listed on all the slips, both signed and unsigned, went into the construction of respondents’ house, the court pointed out the necessity of proof by petitioner of every item of its claim by a fair preponderance of the evidence. In that connection he observed that the contractor was an interested party; that he had failed to finish the house under his contract, making him liable to respondents thereby; and that he was then in bankruptcy. He further found that petitioner had failed to prove, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, deliveries of materials according to the unsigned slips amounting to $930.38. Petitioner’s claim according to the evidence was for $1634.63. He therefore gave his decision and entered a decree for petitioner for the balance of its claim in the sum of $704.25.

We have carefully examined the transcript and we cannot say that the decision of the trial justice was clearly wrong.

The petitioner’s appeal is denied and dismissed, the decree appealed from is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the superior court for further proceedings.
# C_2010179EN.01006001.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/60

---

Action brought on 14 May 2010 — Wilk v Commission

(Case F-32/10)

(2010/C 179/106)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Christian Wilk (Trier, Germany) (represented by: R. Adam, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of decisions ordering recovery of one half of the installation allowance paid to the applicant following his divorce, and an application for damages.

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Commission decisions of 20 August 2009 and 8 September 2009 ordering recovery of alleged overpayment; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission decisions of 20 August 2009 and 8 September 2009 ordering recovery of alleged overpayment;

| — | annul the Commission decision of 15 February 2010 upholding that recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission decision of 15 February 2010 upholding that recovery;

| — | order the Commission to repay the sum taken back by the Commission with interest at the statutory rate from the date of recovery until settlement; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to repay the sum taken back by the Commission with interest at the statutory rate from the date of recovery until settlement;

| — | order the Commission to pay damages for having seriously damaged the applicant’s image and reputation; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay damages for having seriously damaged the applicant’s image and reputation;

| — | alternatively, reserve to the applicant the right to claim additional damages for the harm suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, reserve to the applicant the right to claim additional damages for the harm suffered;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Surrie Fenlaw , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00004

- CV v.

Harmony Independent School District, et

al. , Appellee s Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 09

- 2 5TX ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of prosecu tion . Therefore, we dismiss t he appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Surrie Fenlaw , pay all costs incurred by reason of this

appeal.

RENDERED JULY 13, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Annual report**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.4701/2:
ItemNumber:0499-T-05(online)
CGP System Number:000600173
 
2001
2002
2004
 **
Appendix E: Comparison of emission units and rates exempt from permitting in Washington, some other states, and the EPA Tribal NSR rule
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 4022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1769]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 
Sunshine Act Meetings.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday February 17, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, (202) 418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-1769 Filed 1-24-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 33-90138,
33-90852 and 33-92328) and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-22547)
of Walden Residential Properties, Inc. and in the related
prospectuses of our report dated March 3, 1997 (which expresses
an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to a change in the method of accounting for the cost of
replacement carpets as discussed in Note 2), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Walden
Residential Properties, Inc., and our report dated March 3,
1995, with respect to the combined financial statements of
Walden Predecessors, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1996.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 14, 1997
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0306 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DARRIN WILLIAM MATT,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 21 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2024

09/13/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0306
### §5107. Major acquisition program risk assessment

(a) In General.—Not later than October 15 of each year, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall provide to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a briefing regarding a current assessment of the risks associated with all current major acquisition programs, as that term is defined in section 5103(f).

(b) Elements.—Each assessment under this subsection shall include, for each current major acquisition program, discussion of the following:

(1) The top five current risks to such program.

(2) Any failure of such program to demonstrate a key performance parameter or threshold during operational test and evaluation conducted during the previous fiscal year.

(3) Whether there has been any decision in such fiscal year to order full-rate production before all key performance parameters or thresholds are met.

(4) Whether there has been any breach of major acquisition program cost (as defined by the Major Systems Acquisition Manual) in such fiscal year.

(5) Whether there has been any breach of major acquisition program schedule (as so defined) during such fiscal year.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXV, §3526(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2317, §2906; renumbered §5107 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§122(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4239, 4240; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXII [LXXXII], §8240(e), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4667.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, §8240(e)(1), substituted "October 15" for "April 15 and October 15".

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 116–283, §8240(e)(2)(A), substituted "the previous fiscal year" for "the 2 fiscal-year quarters preceding such assessment".

Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 116–283, §8240(e)(2)(B), substituted "such fiscal year" for "such 2 fiscal-year quarters".

Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 116–283, §8240(e)(2)(C), substituted "such fiscal year" for "such 2 fiscal-year quarters".

Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 116–283, §8240(e)(2)(D), substituted "such fiscal year" for "such 2 fiscal-year quarters".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §122(b), renumbered section 2906 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 5103(f)" for "section 2903(f)".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          29,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         683,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 689,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              169
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                     411,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   689,714
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,475
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,848)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .90
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                                    FORM 10-K

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That each person whose signature appears below
has made, constituted, and appointed, and by this instrument does make,
constitute, and appoint Robert M. Wilson, Glenn E. Morrical, and Christian D.
Saine, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney, with full power of
substitution and re-substitution, to affix for him and in his name, as
attorney-in-fact his signature as a Director or Officer, or both, of ROBERDS,
INC., an Ohio corporation ("Company"), to the Company's annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, pursuant to the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and to any and all amendments and exhibits to that Form
10-K, and to any and all applications and other documents pertaining thereto,
giving and granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do
and perform every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done, as fully as the
undersigned might do or could do if personally present, and hereby ratifies and
confirms all that each of such attorneys-in-fact or any such substitute shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney shall
survive the death or disability of the undersigned.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed as of this 24th day
of February, 2000.



/s/ Melvin H. Baskin                          /s/ Jerry L. Kirby
-------------------------------             ------------------------------------
Melvin H. Baskin                            Jerry L. Kirby

/s/ Robert M. Wilson                          /s/ Gilbert P. Williamson
-------------------------------             ------------------------------------
Robert M. Wilson                             Gilbert P. Williamson

/s/ Howard W. Smith                           /s/ Donald C. Wright
-------------------------------             ------------------------------------
Howard W. Smith                              Donald C. Wright

/s/ James F. Robeson                          /s/ Gearry D. Davenport
-------------------------------             ------------------------------------
James F. Robeson                             Gearry D. Davenport

/s/ Daniel L. Thobe
-------------------------------
Daniel L. Thobe




                 ---------------------------------------------

                 ROBERDS, INC. 1999 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
                                 Page 128 of 128
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Emilio Azcárraga Jean, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                          The Company’s annual report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: July 7, 2016

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Emilio Azcárraga Jean |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                          | Emilio Azcárraga Jean |
|   |   | Title:                         | Chairman of the Board, President |
|   |   |                           | and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### § 700.551 Franking privilege and official stationery.

An employee is strictly prohibited from using Government franked envelopes with or without applied postage, or official letterhead stationery for personal business. (18 U.S.C. 1719)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Komatsu Aviation Training Relocation Wraps Up

By Staff Sgt. Amber E. N. Jacobs18th Wing Public Affairs

                KOMATSU AIR BASE, Japan  –              http://www.kadena.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123374361

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
USDA GUS TRAINING

GUS Updates
What’s New for GUS? 

• Why was GUS updated? 

• It has been several years since GUS was updated. During that time, new IT and 

security standards have been put in place for all government agencies. The new GUS 

will incorporate these requirements while upgrading the system, which improves 

USDA’s ability to serve its customers. 

Improvements to GUS include: 

• Compliance

• Security

• Stability

• Integration

• Efficiency
What’s New for GUS? Compliance

Improvements to GUS include: 

• Compliance

• Fully complies with Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization 

(MISMO 3.4) and Uniform Residential Loan Application (URLA) industry 

standards for mortgage underwriting, as required by Fannie Mae, Freddie 

Mac, and Federal Government policy to support changes that have occurred 

in residential mortgage lending.

• Security

• Stability

• Integration

• Efficiency
What’s New for GUS? Security 

Improvements to GUS include: 

• Compliance

• Security

• Data stored in GUS is secure and will continue to follow the guidelines of the 

Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 (FISMA).

• Stability

• Integration

• Efficiency
What’s New for GUS? Stability

Improvements to GUS include: 

• Compliance

• Security

• Stability

• Moving the system to a modern customizable platform improves stability and 

smooths the way for future upgrades, as needed. 

• Integration

• Efficiency
What’s New for GUS? Integration

Improvements to GUS include: 

• Compliance

• Security

• Stability

•Integration

• GUS will continue to integrate with other systems making it easier to retrieve 

credit reports, retrieve loans from Loan Origination Systems (LOS), get CAIVRS 

number (Credit Alert Verification Reporting Systems), verify eligibility of loans, 

and upload/import to USDA’s Guaranteed Loan System (GLS). 

• Efficiency
What’s New for GUS? Efficiency 

Improvements to GUS include: 

• Compliance

• Security

• Stability

• Integration

• Efficiency

• A modernized GUS is streamlined and serves more customers in less time. 

• Usability for lenders and brokers is improved through a modernized GUS 

front-end intake process for loan applications. 

• Data collection accuracy as required for the new URLA specifications and for 

Rural Development (RD).
End Slide 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Order entered January 27 , 20 20

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00349
- CR
RONALD GAYLON ROSSER , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 199 th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199
- 81000
- 2015



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 22, 2020 motion asking the Court to consider a correction to appel lant ’ s brief. We note that we are unable to alter electr onically filed
documents. To the extent appellant seeks to file an amended brief, we GRANT his request and
ORDER any amended brief filed on or before Fe bruary 6, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D

. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of S1 Corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:(a) the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2005 filed onthe date hereof with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b) information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany.     /s/ Matthew Hale     Matthew Hale  Chief FinancialOfficer       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchangecommission or its staff upon request.November 9, 2005