### 58369 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 185 / Friday, September 24, 2010 / Notices

include a requirement to be aware of the status of DeCA and its commissaries, including Department of Defense (DoD) civilian personnel, military service personnel not assigned to DeCA, personnel of the military service exchange services (Army Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES)/Navy Exchange Service Command (NEXCOM)/Marine Corps Exchange (MCX)/Coast Guard Exchange System (CGES) personnel), and DeCA business partners personnel that includes personnel of contractors, manufacturers, vendors, brokers and distributors doing
business with DeCA.

To communicate with DeCA and nonDeCA personnel during non-duty hours as necessary to facilitate management and business functions required for the administration of a 24/7, worldwide organization.

**ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE**

**SYSTEM**
**, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND** 

**THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES :** 

In addition to those disclosures generally permitted under 5 U.S.C. 552a(b) of the Privacy Act of 1974, these records contained therein may specifically be disclosed outside the DoD as a routine use pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows:

To Federal, state, or local governments during actual emergencies, exercises or continuity of operations tests for the purpose of responding to emergency situations.

The DoD ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ set forth at the beginning of the Defense Commissary Agency’s compilation of systems of records notices apply to this system.

**POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING**
**, RETRIEVING** 
**, ACCESSING** 
**, RETAINING** 
**, AND** 

**DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM :** 

Storage: Paper file folders and electronic storage media.

**RETRIEVABILITY :** 

Records are retrieved by name, organization, mission essential status, emergency relocation group status, telework status or emergency operations duty officer/member status.

**SAFEGUARDS :** 

Electronic records are maintained in password-protected network and accessible only to DeCA personnel, management, and administrative support personnel on a need-to-know basis to perform their duties. Access to
the network where records are maintained requires a valid Common Access Card (CAC). Electronic files and databases are password protected with
access restricted to authorized users. Paper records are secured in locked cabinets, offices, or buildings during non-duty hours. The same security standards currently applied to individually issued CAC cards are applicable to paper compilations limited to a particular organization issued to individual supervisors, managers and employees of that organization.

**RETENTION AND DISPOSAL :** 

Records are destroyed upon termination/departure of DeCA personnel or when superseded. Electronic records are manually deleted from the agency virtual file cabinet under the supervision of agency records managers upon supersession of the record. Paper records are shredded using a cross-cut shredder that reduces
the records to confetti form or better upon supersession of the record.

**SYSTEM MANAGER (**  **S )**  **AND ADDRESS :** 

Director, Performance and Policy and Component Continuity Coordinator,
1300 E Avenue, Fort Lee, VA 23801–

1800.

**NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE :** 

Individuals seeking to determine
whether information about themselves is contained in this system should address written inquiries to the Privacy Act Officer, DeCA, 1300 E Avenue, Fort
Lee, VA 23801–1800.

Requests should contain name, home address and home phone number for positive identification of requester.

**RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES :** 

Individuals seeking access to records
about themselves contained in this system of records should address written inquiries to the Privacy Act Officer, DeCA, 1300 E Avenue, Fort Lee,

VA 23801–1800.

Requests should contain name, home address and home phone number for positive identification of requester.

**CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES :** 

The DeCA rules for accessing records, for contesting contents, and appealing initial agency determinations are contained in 32 CFR part 327, or may be obtained from the system manager.

**RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES :** 

The individual, supervisors, existing databases ( i.e. Defense Civilian Personnel Data (DCPDS), Fouth Estate Personnel Accountability and Assessment System (FEPAAS), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) and Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
Electronic Official Personnel File (eOPF)), computer access or information security documentation. **EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM :** 

None.

[FR Doc. 2010–23876 Filed 9–23–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers** 

**Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for**  **the North Branch Ecorse Creek, Flood Risk Management General**  **Reevaluation Study, Wayne County, MI**

**AGENCY :**  Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Intent.

**SUMMARY :**  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Detroit District, is issuing this Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for flood risk management measures along the North Branch Ecorse Creek (NBEC) in Wayne County, MI. The Draft EIS is being prepared in conjunction with a General Reevaluation Report (GRR) of the NBEC to reevaluate the feasibility of providing flood risk management measures. The GRR/EIS is being completed in partnership with Wayne County, MI. The Draft EIS will address potential environmental impacts of the construction, operation, and
maintenance of a number of structural
and non-structural alternatives that will be evaluated as part of the GRR study.

**DATES :**  A public meeting on the study will be held on October 28, 2010 at 7

p.m.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at the Canfield Community Center, 1801 N. Beech Daly Road, Dearborn Heights,

MI.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For information or questions concerning the Draft EIS please contact Ms. Florence Bissell, Environmental Analysis Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Detroit District, 477 Michigan Avenue, P.O. Box 1027, Detroit, MI 48231–1027, at (313)

226–3510 or at florence.k.bissell@usace.army.mil.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Background: The NBEC has experienced severe flooding over the last 40 years, resulting in property damage, sewage back-ups, road closures and other impacts that have threatened or resulted in lost property, environmental and health degradation,
and lost economic value. Severe flooding in 2000 and 2004 negatively impacted over 9,000 individual


### 58370 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 185 / Friday, September 24, 2010 / Notices

properties. USACE Detroit District, andWayne County, MI acting as the nonfederal sponsor, have formed a partnership to reevaluate the flooding issues along the NBEC. The GRR/EIS, will update a feasibility study and EIS completed by USACE in 1988. The purpose of this GRR/EIS is reanalysis of the federal interest in developing flood risk management measures on the NBEC. The analysis will include reformulation of the authorized plan from the 1988 study for applicability. The GRR/EIS will incorporate a review of developments in the floodplain during the last 22 years, consideration of changing needs of the local communities, and current
environmental conditions. When complete, the GRR/EIS will recommend if flood mitigation measures should
occur with federal assistance. Federal funding for the GRR/EIS phase originates from American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds, which requires the GRR/EIS to be developed on an
accelerated schedule.

Project Authority: The GRR/EIS is being completed based on authorization by Section 102 of the River and Harbor Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–789). The original study Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement for
Flood Protection in the Ecorse Creek Drainage Basin, Wayne County, Michigan, 1987 (Revised 1988) recommended the development of a retention basin as the selected plan. Construction of the selected plan from the 1988 feasibility study was further authorized by Section 101(a) (14) of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1990. Construction never occurred. Project authorization was
extended in Section 3179 of the WRDA
of 2007 to conduct the GRR.

Project Alternatives: A number of flood risk management alternatives will be evaluated as part of the GRR/EIS including retention basins, stream widening and restoration, flood walls and levees, along with non-structural measures such as management plans, warning systems and property acquisition.

Draft EIS Scoping Process: The scoping process for public input will involve Federal, State, and local agencies, along with affected Indian tribes, other interested parties and
entities. Coordination with natural resources and environmental agencies
will be conducted under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, and the National Historic Preservation Act. A public meeting will be held ( see **DATES** ) to include
discussion of environmental issues associated with potential flood risk management alternatives.

Issues to be considered during the development of the Draft EIS and public review and input process include: aesthetics, dredged material disposal, water quality, air and noise quality, hazardous, toxic and radiological waste, threatened and endangered species, environmental justice, wetlands, historic properties, recreation, cumulative impacts, natural resource mitigation and other issues that may affect public health and welfare. It is
estimated the Draft EIS will be available for public review and comment in late

2011.

John M. Niemiec,
Project Manager.

[FR Doc. 2010–23934 Filed 9–23–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3720–58–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Department of the Navy**

**Notice of Intent To Prepare a Legislative Environmental Impact**  **Statement for the Proposed Extension**
**of the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range Land Withdrawal** 

Lead Agency: Department of the Navy,

DoD.

Cooperating Agency: Bureau of Land Management, Department of the

Interior.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and regulations implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Parts 1500– 1508), the Department of the Navy (DoN) and the United States Marine Corps (USMC), with the cooperation of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), intends to prepare a Legislative Environmental Impact Statement (L–EIS) and conduct public scoping meetings for the proposed extension of the withdrawal of approximately 226,711 acres of public land in Imperial and Riverside counties, California, for continued military use of the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range (CMAGR).

The California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103–433) withdrew 226,711 acres of public land to DoN, reserving these lands for defense-related purposes for a period of 20 years (until October 31, 2014). The Act provides that the DoN may seek extension of the CMAGR withdrawal. As part of the withdrawal process, the Secretary of the Navy is required to publish a Draft L–EIS addressing legislative alternatives and
the effects of continued withdrawal. The
CMAGR Draft L–EIS will evaluate the environmental effects of the proposal to
extend the land withdrawal for an additional 25 years (through 2039) and
will evaluate alternative actions to restructure the existing range boundary for improved efficiency in the management of the CMAGR and adjacent lands.

**DATES AND ADDRESSES :**  DoN is initiating a 90-day public scoping process to identify community interests and specific issues to be addressed in the L–EIS, which starts with the publication of this Notice of Intent (NOI). Four public scoping meetings have been
scheduled to enlist written and oral comments regarding the scope of the Draft L–EIS analysis:

1. Monday, December 6, 2010, 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m., Yuma County Library, Rooms B–C, 2951 S. 21st Drive, Yuma, Arizona 85364;

2. Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m., Holiday Inn Express—El Centro, Conference Room B, 350 Smoketree Drive, El Centro, California

92243;

3. Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m., Holiday Inn, 1800 E. Palm Canyon, Palm Springs, California 92264; and

4. Thursday, December 9, 2010, 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m., San Diego Planning Commission Hearing Room, 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B, San Diego, California

92123.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  CMAGR L–EIS Project Manager (Attn: Kelly Finn), NAVFAC Southwest, 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92132– 5190; phone 619–532–4452. Additional supplementary information regarding
the CMAGR Draft L–EIS is available at http://
www.chocolatemountainrenewal.com. Please submit requests for special assistance, sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired, or other auxiliary aids needed at the scoping meeting to the L–EIS Project Manager by November 26, 2010.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Public scoping meeting schedules and locations will also be published in local newspapers. The public is invited toattend these meetings to view projectrelated displays, speak with DoN and USMC representatives, and submit public comment forms at information stations. A court reporter will be available at the meetings to accept oral comments. The scoping meetings will be conducted in an informal, open