alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012217EN.01002003.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2012 — XXXLutz Marken v OHIM — Meyer Manufacturing (CIRCON)

(Case T-542/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark CIRCON - Prior Community word mark CIRCULON - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Highly distinctive character - Goodwill - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Procedure before the Board of Appeal - Rights of the defence - Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009)

2012/C 217/43

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: XXXLutz Marken GmbH (Wels, Austria) (represented by: H. Pannen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: R. Manea, and subsequently by: K. Klüpfel, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Meyer Manufacturing Co. Ltd (Kowloon, Hong Kong) (represented by: M. Fiedler, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2010 (Case R 40/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Meyer Manufacturing Co. Ltd and XXXLutz Marken GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 September 2010 (Case R 40/2010-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 September 2010 (Case R 40/2010-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by XXXLutz Marken GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by XXXLutz Marken GmbH;

| 3. | Orders Meyer Manufacturing Co. Ltd to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Meyer Manufacturing Co. Ltd to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
§ 381.45 Attestation requirements. Each establishment that participates in the New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS) shall submit on an annual basis an attestation to the management member of the local FSIS circuit safety committee stating that it maintains a program to monitor and document any work-related conditions of establishment workers, and that the program includes the following elements: ( a ) Policies to encourage early reporting of symptoms of injuries and illnesses, and assurance that it has no policies or programs in place that would discourage the reporting of injuries and illnesses.
( b ) Notification to employees of the nature and early symptoms of occupational illnesses and injuries, in a manner and language that workers can understand, including by posting in a conspicuous place or places where notices to employees are customarily posted, a copy of the FSIS/OSHA poster encouraging reporting and describing reportable signs and symptoms.
( c ) Monitoring on a regular and routine basis of injury and illness logs, as well as nurse or medical office logs, workers' compensation data, and any other injury or illness information available.
# C_2007082EN.01002603.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-47/05) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

1

---
Summary of Standard Director Compensation Arrangements - Non-Employee Directors



 EXHIBIT 10.14 
 MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 
 Summary of Standard Director Compensation Arrangements for
Non-Employee Directors 
 Description of Director Compensation (effective as of May 5, 2008) 
 Directors who are employees of Magma do not receive separate compensation for service on the Board of Directors. Directors who are not employees of Magma
receive a cash retainer of $30,000 per year and $2,500 per Board or committee meeting attended ($1,000 for teleconference meetings) for services as a member of the Board of the Directors. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives a
fee of $20,000 per year, and the Chairman of the Compensation and Nominating Committee receives a fee of $15,000 per year; the other members of the Audit Committee receive a fee of $10,000 per year, and the other members of the Compensation
Committee receive a fee of $7,500 per year. Magma reimburses its non-employee Directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the board or its Committees. 
 Pursuant to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, which was approved by Magma’s stockholders, each non-employee director receives an initial
award of 20,000 restricted stock units upon appointment or election. The initial award vests as to 25% on the first anniversary of the award date. The remainder of the award vests quarterly over 12 quarters. Following the conclusion of each regular
annual meeting of stockholders, each continuing non-employee director receives an additional award of 10,000 restricted stock units. When a non-employee director is appointed to the Board of Directors at a time other than at an annual meeting, such
director receives an interim award that is a pro rata portion of the annual 10,000 restricted stock unit award. The annual awards and the interim awards vest in full on the day immediately prior to the annual meeting of stockholders in the year
immediately following the year of the grant if the director continues as a member of the Board on that date. All awards will vest fully upon a change in control of Magma, as set forth under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
§ 2.10 Licensees whose licenses have been suspended or revoked. ( a ) Any person whose license or registration has been suspended for any reason shall not be licensed, or registered, in his or her own name or in any other manner, within the period during which the order of suspension is in effect. No partnership, firm, corporation, or other legal entity in which any such person has a substantial interest, financial or otherwise, will be licensed or registered during that period. Any person whose license has been suspended for any reason may apply to the Deputy Administrator, in writing, for reinstatement of his or her license or registration.
( b ) Any person whose license has been revoked shall not be licensed or registered, in his or her own name or in any other manner, and no partnership, firm, corporation, or other legal entity in which any such person has a substantial interest, financial or otherwise, will be licensed or registered.
( c ) Any person whose license has been suspended or revoked shall not buy, sell, transport, exhibit, or deliver for transportation, any animal during the period of suspension or revocation, under any circumstances, whether on his or her behalf or on the behalf of another licensee or registrant.
[85 FR 28796, May 13, 2020]
§ 319.182 Braunschweiger and liver sausage or liverwurst. ( a ) “Braunschweiger” is a cooked sausage made from fresh, cured, and/or frozen pork, beef, and/or veal and at least 30 percent pork, beef, and/or veal livers computed on the weight of the fresh livers. It may also contain pork and/or beef fat. Mechanically Separated (Species) may be used in accordance with § 319.6. Binders and extenders may be used as permitted in § 319.140. The product may have a smoked taste characteristic, which may be imparted by use of smoked meats, smoke flavoring or smoking. If prepared from components of a single species, the product name may reflect the species, e.g., “Beef Braunschweiger.” Braunschweiger may also be labeled as any of the following: “Braunschweiger—A Liver Sausage,” “Braunschweiger—A Liverwurst,” or “Braunschweiger (Liver Sausage)” or “Braunschweiger (Liverwurst).”
( b ) “Liver Sausage” or “Liverwurst” is a cooked sausage made from fresh, cured, and/or frozen pork, beef, and/or veal and at least 30 percent pork, beef, veal, sheep, and/or goat livers computed on the weight of the fresh livers. It may also contain pork and/or beef byproducts. Mechanically Separated (Species) may be used in accordance with § 319.6. Binders and extenders maybe used as permitted in § 319.140. If prepared from components of a single species, the product name may reflect that species, e.g., “Pork Liver Sausage.”
[47 FR 36108, Aug. 19, 1982]
邮寄至:

上邮票在此贴

将此表寄给美国农业部或美国住房和城市发展部,地址如

下。如果你无法填写此表,请致电美国农业部农村发展局

民权办公室,电话是 (202) 692-0252。

1.	 美国农业部长

1400 Independence Ave.

Washington, DC 20250

2.	 美国农业部主任

业务办公室

Room 1575-S

1400 Independence Ave.

Washington, DC 20250

3.	 公民权利办公室主任

美国农业部农村发展局

Stop 0703

14th St. and Independence Ave., SW

Washington, DC 20250-0703

4.	 公平住房和平等机会办公室 

美国住房和城市发展部(HUD)

Washington, DC 20410

5.	 任何美国住房和城市发展部区

域办事处

美国农业部是一个平等机会的提供者、雇主和贷款人。

PA-2265 | 2022年8月

你的公平住房伙伴

如果你的住房权利被剥夺,你可能经历了非法的歧视。

公平住房是你的权利!

共促美国繁荣发展

rd.usda.gov/about-rd/offices/civil-rights

1 (800) 787-8821 (免费电话) 

1 (800) 877-8339 (联邦中转) 

RA.RD.MOSTL.CivilRights@usda.gov

根据1995年的《减少文书工作法》,一个机构不能进行或发起信息收集,

也不要求个人回应,除非它显示有效的OMB控制号。这个信息收集的有 效OMB控制号码是0575-0018。完成这项信息收集工作所需的时间估计

平均为30分钟,包括审查说明、搜索现有数据源、收集和维护所需数据、

完成和审查信息收集工作的时间。

OMB编号0575-0018
你是住房歧视的受害者吗?

拥有一个安全和体面的地方作为“家“的美国梦反映了我们的共同信

念:在这个国家,机会和成功是每个人都可以得到的。根据我们的公平

住房法,每个公民都有机会在自己选择的房子或公寓里建立更好的生

活--无论他们的种族、肤色、宗教、性别、国籍、家庭状况或残疾。美国农

业部(USDA)致力于为所有美国人提供公平住房。这个表格可以帮助你

解决住房歧视问题。

如何辨别住房歧视?

根据《公平住房法》,以下行为是违反法律的:

• 拒绝租给你或卖给你住房

• 告诉你没有住房,但实际上有住房的

• 只向你展示某些社区的公寓或住宅

• 为出售或出租住房设定不同的条款、条件或特权

• 提供不同的住房服务或设施

• 只向喜欢的人群宣传住房

• 拒绝向你提供有关抵押贷款的信息,拒绝向你提供抵押贷款,或对抵

押贷款施加不同的条款或条件

• 拒绝为你提供财产保险

• 以歧视性的方式进行房产评估

• 拒绝让你对你的住宅或公共使用区域进行合理的改造,如果这对你充

分使用住房可能是必要的,由你承担费用。(在合理的情况下,只有当你

同意在搬家时将房产恢复到原来的状态时,房东才可以允许进行修改)

• 拒绝在规则、政策、做法或服务方面提供合理的便利,如果这对你在与

非残疾平等的基础上使用住房是必要的

• 未能以无障碍方式设计和建造住房

• 骚扰、胁迫、恐吓或干扰任何人行使或协助他人行使其公平住房权利

基于这些因素的住房歧视是不合法的:

• 种族

• 肤色

• 国籍

• 宗教

• 性别

• 残疾

• 家庭状况

(有18岁以下孩子的家庭,或正

在等待孩子的家庭)

如果你认为你的权利受到了侵犯:

• 美国农业部或州或地方的公平住屋机构已准备好帮助你提出投诉。

• 在收到你的资料后,美国农业部或州或地方的公平住屋机构会与你

联络,讨论你的关注。

在这里拆开。折叠后用胶水或胶带封口(不要用钉书机)。

说明:(请打字或打印)仔细阅读本表。尽量回答所有问题。如果你不知道

答案或某一问题不适用你,请留空。你有一年的时间从指称的歧视行为

发生之日起提出投诉。在你的表格上签名并注明日期。

1 你遭遇了什么? 

你是如何受到歧视的?例如:你是否被拒绝租房或买房的机会?被拒绝

贷款?被告知没有住房,而事实上有住房?与其他寻求住房的人受到不

同的待遇?简要说明发生了什么。

2 为什么你认为你是住房歧视的受害者?

是不是因为你的:

种族

肤色

宗教

性别

国籍

残疾	

	 家庭状况

(有18岁以下孩子的家庭)

例如: 你是否因为你的种族而被拒绝住房?你是否因为你的宗教信仰而

被拒绝提供抵押贷款?或者因为你有孩子而被拒绝入住公寓?简要说

明你认为你的住房权利被剥夺的原因,并圈出你认为适用的上述因素。

3 你认为是谁歧视了你?

例如:是房东、业主、银行、房地产代理、经纪人、公司或组织吗?请指出你

认为是谁歧视了你。

姓名: ___________________________________________________

地址: ___________________________________________________

城市: _________________________州: ______ 邮政编码: ________

4 被指控的歧视行为发生在哪里?

例如:是在租赁单位吗?单一家庭住宅?公共或辅助住房?活动房屋?

它是否发生在银行或其他贷款机构?请提供地址。

姓名: ___________________________________________________

地址: ___________________________________________________

城市: _________________________州: ______ 邮政编码: ________

5 最后一次歧视行为发生在什么时候?

输入日期: _______________________________________________

被指控的歧视行为是否持续? 是 否

签名: _______________________ 日期: ______________

住房歧视信息

你的姓名: ____________________________________________________

你的地址: ____________________________________________________

城市: ____________________________ 州: _______ 邮政编码:_________

最佳通话时间: _______________________

你的日间电话: _____________________ 晚间电话:____________________

电子邮件 _____________________________________________________

如果我们联系不上你,还可以找谁? _________________________________

联系人的姓名: _____________________ 最佳通话时间: ________________

日间电话: ________________________ 晚间电话: ___________________
#### Mexico Onyx Quarry Company, a Corporation, Respondent, v. David J. Kelley, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave-to .defendant to withdraw demurrer and to answer on payment of costs. Ho opinion.
§ 311.31 Livers affected with carotenosis; livers designated as “telangiectatic,” “sawdust,” or “spotted.” ( a ) Livers affected with carotenosis shall be condemned.
( b ) Cattle livers and calf livers showing the conditions sometimes designated as “telangiectatic,” “sawdust,” or “spotted” shall be disposed of as follows: ( 1 ) When any or all of the conditions are slight in the organ, the whole organ shall be passed for human food without restriction.
( 2 ) When any or all of the conditions are more severe than slight and involve less than one-half of the organ, while in the remainder of the organ the conditions are slight or nonexistent, the remainder shall be passed for human food without restriction and the other portion shall be condemned.
( 3 ) When any or all of the conditions are more severe than slight and involve one-half or more of the organ, the whole organ shall be condemned.
( 4 ) The divisions of an organ into two parts as contemplated in this paragraph for disposition, shall be accomplished by one cut through the organ. This, of course, does not prohibit incisions which are necessary for inspection.
( c ) “Telangiectatic,” “sawdust,” or “spotted” livers and parts of livers which are condemned for human food may be shipped from an official establishment for purposes other than human food in accordance with § 314.10 of this subchapter.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
   **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO** **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350** **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
    In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc. (formerly known as Active IQ Technologies, Inc.) (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark D. Dacko the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   ****Date: January 14, 2005
By:
/s/ Mark D. DackoMark D. DackoChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Emissions Inventory and Air Quality Modeling Data Files for Final Tier 3 Motor 

Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards

FROM: Margaret Zawacki

Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

DATE: February 20, 2014

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide contact information for persons who would like 

to obtain emissions inventory and air quality modeling data files which were used in the air 

quality modeling for the Tier 3 motor vehicle emissions and fuel standards. The emissions

inventory modeling analyses are discussed in the Emissions Inventory for Air Quality Modeling 

Technical Support Document: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards. The air 

quality modeling analysis is discussed in the Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document:

Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards. Both technical support documents are 

contained in the docket for the Tier 3 rulemaking (EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135).

To obtain the data files please contact:

Sharon Phillips

EPA/OAQPS/AQMD?

109 T.W. Alexander Drive

C439-01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

(919) 541-2138

phillips.sharon@epa.gov

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
#### § 592.350 Accessibility of product.

Each product for which service is requested shall be so placed as to disclose fully its class, quality, quantity, and condition as the circumstances may warrant.
#### § 201.53 Persons subject to the Act not to circulate misleading reports about market conditions or prices.

No packer, swine contractor, live poultry dealer, stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer shall knowingly make, issue, or circulate any false or misleading reports, records, or representation concerning the market conditions or the prices or sale of any livestock, meat, or live poultry.

[73 FR 62440, Oct. 21, 2008]
§ 439.1 Definitions. ( a ) *Accredited Laboratory Program (ALP).* The voluntary Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) program in which non-Federal laboratories are accredited as capable of performing analyses with the level of quality that is necessary to maintain accreditation in the program, on samples of raw or processed meat, poultry, and egg products, and through which a proficiency testing sample program for quality assurance is conducted.
( b ) *Food chemistry.* Analysis of raw or processed meat or poultry products for the components moisture, protein, fat, and salt.
( c ) *Initial accreditation proficiency testing sample.* A sample provided by the FSIS ALP to a non-Federal laboratory to determine whether the laboratory's analytical capability meets the standards for acceptance into the program. The concentration or presence of the targeted analyte(s) and the composition of the components in the sample is unknown to the laboratory.
( d ) *Inter-laboratory accreditation maintenance proficiency testing sample.* A sample provided by the FSIS ALP to an accredited laboratory to assist in determining whether the laboratory is maintaining acceptable analytical performance for a given analyte or component. The concentration or presence of the targeted analyte(s) and the composition of the components in the sample is unknown to the laboratory.
( e ) *International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 13528.* ISO 13528:2015(E) Corrected version 2016, “Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison,” October 15, 2016, or updated versions.
( f ) *Probation.* The period commencing with official notification to an accredited laboratory that it no longer satisfies the ALP performance requirements specified in this part and ending with official notification that accreditation is fully restored, is suspended, or is revoked.
( g ) *Refusal of accreditation.* An action taken by FSIS when a laboratory that is applying for accreditation is denied the accreditation.
( h ) *Responsibly connected.* Any individual, or entity, that is a partner, officer, director, manager, or owner of 10 percent or more of the voting stock of the applicant or recipient of accreditation or an employee in a managerial or executive capacity or any employee who conducts or supervises the analysis of FSIS samples.
( i ) *Revocation of accreditation.* An action taken by FSIS against a laboratory thereby removing the laboratory's certification of accreditation and participation in inter-laboratory accreditation maintenance proficiency testing sample events.
( j ) *Suspension of accreditation.* An action taken by FSIS against a laboratory thereby temporarily removing the laboratory's certification of accreditation and participation in the inter-laboratory accreditation maintenance proficiency testing sample events. Suspension of accreditation ends when accreditation either is fully restored or is revoked.
( k ) *z score.* A statistically derived number representing a laboratory's performance for analyzing quantitative proficiency testing samples. The ALP calculates and interprets *z* scores consistent with the ISO 13528 standard.
§ 1.4 Times, places, and requirements for identification of individuals making requests. ( a ) After being informed by the Commission that a record system contains a record pertaining to him or her, an individual may request the Commission to disclose that record in the manner described in this section. Each request for the disclosure of a record or a copy of it shall be addressed to the system manager identified in the notice describing the systems of records, either in person or by filing the request pursuant to 11 CFR 100.19(g). Requests may be made by specifically authorized agents or by parents or guardians of individuals.
( b ) Each individual requesting the disclosure of a record or copy of a record shall furnish the following information with his or her request: ( 1 ) The name of the record system containing the record;
( 2 ) Proof as described in paragraph (c) of this section that he or she is the individual to whom the requested record relates;
( 3 ) Any other information required by the notice describing the record system.
( c ) Proof of identity as required by paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall be provided as described in paragraphs (c) (1) and (2) of this section. Requests made by an agent, parent, or guardian, shall be in accordance with the procedures described in § 1.10. ( 1 ) Requests made in writing shall include a statement, signed by the individual and either notarized or witnessed by two persons (including witnesses' addresses). If the individual appears before a notary, he or she shall submit adequate proof of identification in the form of a drivers license, birth certificate, passport or other identification acceptable to the notary. If the statement is witnessed, it shall include a sentence above the witnesses' signatures that they personally know the individual or that the individual has submitted proof of his or her identification to their satisfaction. In any case in which, because of the extreme sensitivity of the record sought to be seen or copied, the Commission determines that the identification is not adequate, it may request the individual to submit additional proof of identification.
( 2 ) If the request is made in person, the requestor shall submit proof of identification similar to that described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, acceptable to the Commission. The individual may have a person of his or her own choosing accompany him or her when the record is disclosed.
[41 FR 43064, Sept. 29, 1976, as amended at 50 FR 50778, Dec. 12, 1985; 82 FR 60852, Dec. 26, 2017; 89 FR 213, Jan. 2, 2024]
### SUBCHAPTER I—COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM
#### § 534.3 Standards for use of drugs in the raising of fish.

New animal drugs that are the subject of an approved new animal drug application (NADA) or abbreviated new animal drug application (ANADA) under section 512 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. 360b), or a conditional approval under section 571 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 360ccc), or an investigational exemption under section 512(j) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) may be used in the raising of fish. New animal drugs approved under section 512 of the Act may be used in an extra-label manner if such use complies with section 512(a)(4) of the Act and FDA regulations found at 21 CFR part 530.