alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 

Department of Defense Comments on the Formaldehyde Charge Questions to the Expe

Comments submitted by: Office of the Secretary of Defense Chemical and Material Risk Management Directorate 

 Organization: Department of Defense Date Submitted: 19 April 201

*Comment categories: Science or methods (S); Editorial, grammar/spelling, clarifications needed (E); or Other (O). Also please inoutcome, conclusions or implementation of the assessment. 

Comment 

No. Section 

Page & 

Paragraph or 

Global 

Comment Suggested Act

1 The document proposes a hypothetical mode 

of action (MOA) to explain how inhaled formaldehyde might induce leukemia, lymphoma, and a variety of other lymphohematopoietic malignancies in occupationally exposed workers. Some scientists think that formaldehyde is unlikely to have effects at sites other than the upper respiratory tract (NCI, etc.), yet some laboratory studies suggest that formaldehyde may affect the lymphatic and hematopoietic systems. Thus, we believe that it is worth asking the peer review panel to critically evaluate the existing scientific supportfor the proposed new paradigm within the context of EPA’s guidelines for evaluating the MOA of chemically-induced cancers. This would result in a better understanding of differing etiologies and risk factors for the various malignancies related to formaldehyde exposure. 

We recommend that the U.consider including an additquestion concerning whethbe useful to have a quantitausing the current paradigm anemia is the cause of leukAlthough we recognize thaconduct their cancer risk asdifferently than the methodin their guidance documentreasons, these judgments tapproaches should be testereview. 

2 In develop of the inhalation unit risk value, unit

risk estimates for different tumor types were added together and an age adjustment is recommended for the entire sum. While similar approaches have been presented in recent toxicological reviews, it has not been laid out or described in EPA guidance or policy. 

We recommend that a chaadded to address developminhalation unit risk to get thopinion on whether this app
Page 2 of
# C_2010260EN.01001301.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/13

---

Action brought on 29 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Finland

(Case C-380/10)

()

2010/C 260/16

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and K. Nyberg, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Finland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/2/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE), or in any event by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Republic of Finland, with regard to the province of Åland, has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/2/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE), or in any event by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Republic of Finland, with regard to the province of Åland, has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for implementing the Directive expired on 14 May 2009.

---

(1)  OJ 2007 L 108, p. 1.

1

---
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

## Contact Us

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-4433****Fax:**202-366-3666**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Regulations and Compliance

## Regulatory Compliance

Please find links to topics related to regulatory compliance.
                      - Approvals and Permits
                      - Enforcement
                      - Preemption Determinations
                      - Inconsistency Rulings
                      - Field Operations
                      - Hazardous Materials Registration
                      - Interpretations
                      - Legislative Mandates
                      - NTSB Recommendations
                      - Notices and Advisory Bulletins
                      - PHMSA Guidance
                      - Pipeline Drug and Alcohol
                      - Regulations
                      - Standards and Rulemaking
                      - Pipeline Rulemaking Implementation
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-9 

April 29, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4004(f). Temporary Authority

4064(a) Liability of Employers in Multiple Employer &Multiemployer Plans. Applic ability

4082(c). Effective Date; Special Rules. Applicability of Title IV to Multiemployer Plan Terminations 

OPINION: 

 Your letters to the Secretaries of Labor and Treasury requesting an exemption for the members of the * * * from

the employer liability provisions of sec. 4064 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act")

relating to multiemployer plans have been referred to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "Corporation") for

reply. You stated in your correspondence that * * * believes it is unfair to impose liability on employers contributing

to multiemployer plans because many such employers typically have no knowledge of nor participate in the

administration of the pension trusts. Moreover, you noted that in your industry the plans are equally controlled by union

trustees. 

Under sec. 4082(c) of the Act, the Corporation generally does not pay benefits guaranteed under Title IV, and thus

there is no employer liability with respect to multiemployer plans which terminate prior to January 1, 1978. The

Corporation does have discretion in certain cases [*2] to pay guaranteed benefits with respect to such terminations prior

to January 1, 1978 but, of course, it has not yet had cause to exercise this discretion with respect to any of the plans

maintained by the members of * * *. While the provisions of sec. 4064 do not presently apply to any of your members

(and may well not apply until subsequent to January 1, 1978), I wish to inform you of the very limited and specific

circumstances under which the Corporation is authorized to grant such exemptions. 

Sec. 4004(f) of the Act provides that: "In addition to its other powers under this title, for only the first 270 days after

the date of enactment of this Act the Corporation may-- 

(4) waive the application of the provisions of sections 4062, 4063, and 4064 to, or reduce the liability imposed under

such sections on, any employer with respect to a plan terminating during that 270 day period if the Corporation

determines . . ." 

As the Corporation is only authorized to waive the application of sec. 4064 from September 3, 1974 through, and

including, May 30, 1975 when it is being applied to an employer whose plan has terminated during that period and as

sec. 4064 does not apply to * * * members [*3] until January 1, 1978, it is apparent that the Corporation is precluded

from granting the requested exemptions. 

Steven E. Schanes
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |
|   |   |

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
121 STAT. 70 PUBLIC LAW 110–15—MAR. 23, 2007

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 584:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–17 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Mar. 6, considered and passed House.

Mar. 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 110–15

110th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 400 Maryland Avenue Southwest

in the District of Columbia as the ‘‘Lyndon Baines Johnson Department of Education Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 400 Maryland Avenue Southwest in the District of Columbia shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Lyndon Baines Johnson Department of Education Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in law, map, regulation, document, paper, or

other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lyndon

Baines Johnson Department of Education Building’’.

Approved March 23, 2007.

Mar. 23, 2007

[H.R. 584]
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
§ 202.104 Rule 4: Agency action. ( a ) *Informal disposition.* If there appears to be any reasonable ground for doing so, the Agency Head shall investigate the matter complained of. If the Agency Head reasonably believes that there are not sufficient facts to form the basis for further proceeding, the matter may be dropped, without prejudice to subsequent court action on the same cause of action; if it is dropped, the person filing the complaint shall be informed. If the statements in the complaint, and information obtained in the investigation, seem to warrant such action, the Agency Head may make an effort to obtain the consent of the parties to an amicable or informal adjustment of the matter by communication with the parties or their attorneys or representatives. Such communication may be written or oral or both.
( b ) *Service of complaint.* If the matter is not disposed of as provided in paragraph (a), the complaint, together with any amendment which has been filed, shall be served on the respondent with a notice that an answer is required.
( c ) *Service of report of investigation.* A report prepared by the Agency, of its investigation of the matter complained of, and supplements to such a report, may be served on the parties and made a part of the record of the proceeding. Whether such a report or supplement shall be prepared, and whether it shall be served on the parties and made a part of the record, and its contents, shall be in the discretion of the Agency Head. The Judicial Officer shall consider information in such a report or supplement as part of the evidence in the proceeding, to the extent that such information is relevant and material to the proceeding. Any party may submit evidence in rebuttal of such information as is provided generally in these rules for the submission of evidence. Oral testimony, to the extent credible, shall be given greater weight as evidence than such information.
§ 9008.15 Extensions of time. ( a ) It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time under 11 CFR part 9008 will not be routinely granted.
( b ) Whenever a committee has a right or is required to take action within a period of time prescribed by 11 CFR part 9008 or by notice given thereunder, the committee may apply in writing to the Commission for an extension of time in which to exercise such right or take such action. The committee shall demonstrate in the application for extension that good cause exists for its request.
( c ) An application for extension of time shall be made at least 7 calendar days prior to the expiration of the time period for which the extension is sought. The Commission may, upon a showing of good cause, grant an extension of time to a committee that has applied for such extension in a timely manner. The length of time of any extension granted hereunder shall be decided by the Commission and may be less than the amount of time sought by the committee in its application.
( d ) If a committee fails to seek an extension of time, exercise a right or take a required action prior to the expiration of a time period prescribed by 11 CFR part 9008, the Commission may, on the committee's showing of excusable neglect: ( 1 ) Permit such committee to exercise its right(s), or take such required action(s) after the expiration of the prescribed time period; and
( 2 ) Take into consideration any information obtained in connection with the exercise of any such right or taking of any such action before making decisions or determinations under 11 CFR part 9008.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1211 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1211

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act to authorize 
 additional measures to carry out the control of salinity upstream of 
                Imperial Dam in a cost-effective manner.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL ACT.

    Section 208(c) of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act (43 
U.S.C. 1598(c)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``$75,000,000 for subsection 
                202(a)'' and inserting ``$175,000,000 for section 
                202(a)''; and
                    (B) by striking ``paragraph 202(a)(6)'' and 
                inserting ``paragraph (6) of section 202(a)''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``paragraph 
        202(a)(6)'' and inserting ``section 202(a)(6)''.

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall prepare a report on the status 
of implementation of the comprehensive program for minimizing salt 
contributions to the Colorado River from lands administered by the 
Bureau of Land Management directed by section 203(b)(3) of the Colorado 
River Basin Salinity Control Act (43 U.S.C. 1593). The report shall 
provide specific information on individual projects and funding 
allocation. The report shall be transmitted to the Committee on Energy 
and Natural Resources and the Committee on Resources of the House of 
Representatives no later than June 30, 2000.

            Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1211

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act to authorize 
 additional measures to carry out the control of salinity upstream of 
                Imperial Dam in a cost-effective manner.
```
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Technical Assistance Grants to Help Socially 

Disadvantaged Groups

WASHINGTON, April 8, 2019 – Acting Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Joel Baxley today 

announced that USDA is accepting applications for grants to help socially disadvantaged groups develop 

business and strategic plans in rural areas. 

 USDA is making grants available under the Socially Disadvantaged Groups Grant program. Eligible 

applicants include cooperatives, groups of cooperatives and cooperative development centers. The grants are 

intended to help disadvantaged groups develop the capacity to implement plans and undertake projects to 

improve economic and social conditions.

A socially disadvantaged group is one whose members have been subjected to racial, ethnic or gender prejudice 

because of their identity as members of a group without regard to their individual qualities.

 Electronic applications must be submitted to grants.gov by June 3, 2019, at midnight. Paper applications must 

be postmarked and mailed, shipped or sent overnight no later than June 7, 2019. Paper applications can 

submitted to the applicant’s nearest USDA office by June 7, 2019, at close of business local time. Additional 

information is available on page 13877 of the April 8 Federal Register.

 USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve life in 

rural America. Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural 

communities build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, 

partnerships and innovation. Key strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life

#
-  LINC Training Library                  -  Guaranteed Underwriting System (GUS) 
              -  Lender Approval 
              -  Single Family Housing GLP Policy Desk 
              -  Lender Training 
              -  Loan Closing 
              -  Loan Origination 
              -  Loan Servicing 
              -  GUS Lender Test Environment (LTE) 
              -  SFHGLP System Access and Security Guide 
              -  *New* Lender Training Schedule 

                  - English
                  - Spanish

### Training

**New**

Construccion Combinada de Prestamos Permanentes 

Prestamo Combinado de Construccion a Permanente

### **Recorded Live Trainings**

**Income and Assets – January 2024**Webcast | Slides with Notes

**Single Close Construction – January 2024**Webcast | Slides with Notes

**Hot Topics: GUS Loans – December 2023**Webcast | Slides with Notes

**Appraisal and Property Requirements** – **October 2021**Webcast | Slides with Notes | Q&As

**Credit Analysis – June 2022**Webcast | Slides with Notes

**Successful GUS Submissions – November 2022**Webcast |****Slides with Notes

**Handbook Changes and Hot Tips - March 2023**Webcast | Slides with Notes

**Expand your Market with USDA Products – June 2023**|****Slides with Notes

**Program Overview 101 – March 2024**|****Slides with Notes

### Loan Program Basics

                    - Become an Approved Lender
                    - Program Overview 
                    - Loan Terms, Purposes and Restrictions
                    - Refinance Loans

### Applicant Eligibility

                    - Applicant Eligibility
                    - Annual Income
                    - Assets 
                    - Adjusted Income
                    - Repayment Income
                    - Credit Analysis
                    - Ratio Analysis

### Property Eligibility

                    - Property Eligibility
                    - Appraisals
                    - Existing Dwelling and Repair Escrow Requirements 
                    - New Construction
                    - Combination Construction to Permanent Loans
                    - Combination Construction to Permanent Loans: Rehabilitation and Repair
                    - Special Properties: Condominiums and PUDs
                    - Manufactured Homes
                    - Site Requirements
                    - Ownership Requirements
                    - Environmental and Flood Requirements

### Loan Processing and Closing

                    - Submitting a Complete File
                    - Conditional Commitment
                    - Closing the Loan
                    - Loan Note Guarantee
<PAGE>


                                 UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C.   20549





                                  FORM 11-K/A




 (Mark One)
       X       Annual Report Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

          For the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 or    

          Transition Report Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934

          For the transition period from           to






                       Commission file number:  33-33305


                          DEKALB Genetics Corporation
                          Savings and Investment Plan
                            (Full title of the plan)


                          DEKALB GENETICS CORPORATION
                               3100 Sycamore Road
                            DeKalb, Illinois  60115
          (Name of Issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan
                 and address of its principal executive office)


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                            DEKALB Genetics Corporation

                                           (Registrant)

                            By:         Thomas R. Rauman

                                        Thomas R. Rauman
                                        Vice President, Finance
                                         & CFO
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4868]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 21, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Randal S. and Melissa J. Shannon, both of Drexel, Missouri, 
individually and as a part of the Shannon Family Group; and Angela 
Blume, Louisburg, Kansas, as a part of the Shannon Family Group, to 
acquire control of Amsterdam Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
gain control of Citizens Bank, both of Amsterdam, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 1, 2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-4868 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```