alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF **TEXAS** AUFTINf&l. kllllxm C. ww4um4. Page 8

ha6 prtt6Oribtbd **What** t6 kiWWZtlieth6 cOl.WWlflcn rem ror **the** varmlll kinds or wEpunk*s, and th6 %36rtl Of 166lW8M6 &?lm1i66iOndi O? thir 8tate has.adopted thts tom fer rapartirlgpurposuil. ,:
"me Aotuup ~9 $I%0bur4 or InuuraAoe Comlse:oners' Or 'thla'8teOuhas for several ysam been a rambar or the ColaPittsa?NJn2.EUlkS of the Rational &mmlattosl b? Iaauranoe Cammi5lrioncrrs. It Is this Cconlttua whioh pro5Otib46 **the rUrnUtd**  **f&fita!tWh ltO5ZJd** **Cd** ZQ6ke6i euah ahangs a6 are aeas66ary to fseet the x0- quirsaenW~ oi'ths bualn666 and.of the aherega i,~~,.nl;~ti

the variouisWUte6 a6 they aTo ap-

. 3&16 %4fSIitttrS, **WhiQh** IS COZL~O-4 of the **ACtUUldell** O? ilft66n oi the Porty-aight Stat@8 49&t%XbtSilt8, lMB6tUill&Nf YQrk 

# t%tr the Latterpart t-8 April 8aah y66r, an4 

# the ma-4 or fDeurenab C06&66ioneX6 or this Stat0 believes It to be dietiincrtlf to'the int6?.6t of thiu state 

### and 1te WPdl#Oi~U that t&s 

# ACtLmxy ec the rwY%l or XAuux~e c%Ye?dtreiaMrtl 

## ~attenti

l&l 

### laaett.ryt

or shlo Osrrclittee.*
2%~ puipcas c&the p-6~3 tXl a6 autllm4 

### in your lsttar in doubtleoo 8t6te brtslu66aWIthin thu mating or uub-~~Xa(~ph (0) in the $enm'al ridor to 8MtUte 'L#n 4a7 quot.64in your letters hO11QVeX,it is Qur oplalon that the ~apoiwd trip OOZES6

### withinthe lnhlbltloii 8(lplost the fwyl8OntOf tlW8l.t~ 6XmtlSe6 %O tBttWidW&3&& fr (I oontaindl in the general 

### rlEur of aa24 5. B. 4&T;,w 'oh **madi** a8 **r0mwi8t**WC, ragret tOlrtwe4 must declism to a3wOvo Bay- -at of tmvrllng exgsn6ea t0 attenU the owsthg Otztlins4 9.~2

y-cur 

### luttm.

APPROVEDFEB 29, 1940

u---L ATTORNRY GENXRAL OF TEXAS
Exhibit 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In  connection  with  this  Annual  Report   on  Form  10-K  of  Dial   Thru
 International Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended  October
 31, 2002 as filed  with the Securities and  Exchange Commission on the  date
 hereof, I, Allen Sciarillo, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 1350, as  adopted pursuant to S 906 of  the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  This Report on Form 10-K fully  complies with the requirements  of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information  contained  in this  Report  on Form  10-K  fairly
 presents, in all material  respects, the financial  condition and result  of
 operations of the Company.


 Date: January 29, 2003             /s/ Allen Sciarillo
                                    Allen Sciarillo
                                    Chief Financial Officer
#### § 311.33 Listeriosis.

Carcasses of livestock identified as U.S. Suspects because of a history of listeriosis shall be passed for human food after condemnation of the head if the carcass is otherwise normal.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-1

                          CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                              ----------------------------------------------------
                                                2000       1999       1998       1997       1996
                                              --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                           <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Available earnings:
  Net income................................  $54,686    $48,760    $32,248    $27,260    $14,941
  Add interest expense (1)..................   33,131     21,859     15,476     10,871     10,992
                                              -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
Available earnings (2)......................  $87,817    $70,619    $47,724    $38,131    $25,933
                                              =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense..........................  $33,131    $21,859    $15,476    $10,871    $10,992
  Capitalized interest......................    3,404      1,926      2,214        893        142
                                              -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
Total fixed charges.........................  $36,535    $23,785    $17,690    $11,764    $11,134
                                              =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..........     2.40       2.97       2.70       3.24       2.33
                                              =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>

------------------------

NOTES:

(1) Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing costs.

(2) Interest portion of rental expense is not calculated because annual rental
    expense for the Company is not significant.

                                      F-35
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                             909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                        95
<INVENTORY>                                        389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,527
<PP&E>                                           3,538
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,372
<OTHER-SE>                                    (20,447)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,650
<SALES>                                         12,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,264
<CGS>                                            4,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    143
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                143
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       143
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
#### § 111.38 Can the respondent appeal the Commission's final determination?

Yes; within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Commission's final determination under 11 CFR 111.37, the respondent may submit a written petition to the district court of the United States for the district in which the respondent resides, or transacts business, requesting that the final determination be modified or set aside. The respondent's failure to raise an argument in a timely fashion during the administrative process shall be deemed a waiver of the respondent's right to present such argument in a petition to the district court under 52 U.S.C. 30109.

[65 FR 31794, May 19, 2000, as amended at 79 FR 77848, Dec. 29, 2014]
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mega Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Aleksandr Shvarts, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mega Media Group, Inc.





By:
/s/ Aleksandr ShvartsALEKSANDR SHVARTSChief Executive Officer,
DirectorDate:
September 21, 2009
### §5805. Benchmark for loans

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Bank

The term "bank" means an institution subject to examination by a Federal financial institutions regulatory agency.

#### (2) Covered action

The term "covered action" means—

(A) the initiation by a Federal supervisory agency of an enforcement action, including the issuance of a cease-and-desist order; or

(B) the issuance by a Federal supervisory agency of a matter requiring attention, a matter requiring immediate attention; or a matter requiring board attention resulting from a supervisory activity conducted by the Federal supervisory agency.

#### (3) Federal financial institutions regulatory agency

The term "Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies" has the meaning given the term in section 3302 of this title.

#### (4) Federal supervisory agency

The term "Federal supervisory agency" means an agency listed in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of section 3401(7) of this title.

#### (5) Non-IBOR loan

The term "non-IBOR loan" means any loan that, by its terms, does not use in any way LIBOR, any tenor of non-U.S. dollar currency rates formerly known as the London interbank offered rate as administered by ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (or any predecessor or successor administrator thereof), and any other interbank offered rates that are expected to cease, as a benchmark.

#### (b) Benchmarks used by banks

With respect to a benchmark used by a bank—

(1) the bank, in any non-IBOR loan made before, on, or after March 15, 2022, may use any benchmark, including a benchmark that is not SOFR, that the bank determines to be appropriate for the funding model of the bank; the needs of the customers of the bank; and the products, risk profile, risk management capabilities, and operational capabilities of the bank; provided, however, that the use of any benchmark shall remain subject to the terms of the non-IBOR loan, and applicable law; and

(2) no Federal supervisory agency may take any covered action against the bank solely because that benchmark is not SOFR.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. U, §106, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 831.)
### **CHAPTER 77—STEEL AND ALUMINUM ENERGY CONSERVATION AND TECHNOLOGY COMPETITIVENESS**

Sec.
5101.
Findings and purposes.
5102.
Definitions.
5103.
Establishment of scientific research and development program to develop competitive manufacturing technologies and increase energy efficiency in steel and aluminum industries.
5104.
Protection of proprietary rights.
5105.
Coordination.
5106.
Repealed.
5107.
Reports.
5108.
Authorization of appropriations.
5109.
Relation of existing program.
5110.
Drug-free workplace.
§ 100.130 Scope. ( a ) The term *expenditure* does not include payments, gifts, or other things of value described in this subpart.
( b ) For the purpose of this subpart, a payment made by an individual shall not be attributed to any other individual, unless otherwise specified by that other individual. To the extent that a payment made by an individual qualifies as a contribution, the provisions of 11 CFR 110.1(k) shall apply.
# C_2006294EN.01001701.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-353/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/54/EC - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2006/C 294/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Schima and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: S. Schreiner, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC — Statements made with regard to decommissioning and waste management activities (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 37)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court (Fourth Chamber):

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 12. 11. 2005.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.19 What happens when a proposal is approved?

Upon approval the Secretary shall award the contract and add to the contract the full amount of funds to which the contractor is entitled under section 106(a) of the Act.
### §2. Bureau of the Census

The Bureau is continued as an agency within, and under the jurisdiction of, the Department of Commerce.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1012.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., §1 (Mar. 6, 1902, ch. 139, §1, 32 Stat. 51; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §4, 32 Stat. 826; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; June 18, 1929, ch. 28, §21, 46 Stat. 26).

Section 1 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., provided that the "Census Office" temporarily established in the Department of the Interior in accordance with the act of Mar. 3, 1899 (ch. 419, 30 Stat. 1014) "is made" a permanent office in the Department of Commerce. Such wording is no longer necessary, and the provisions, as revised in this section, merely continue the Bureau (of the Census) as an agency within, and under the jurisdiction of, the Department of Commerce.
### **CHAPTER 37—STATE TECHNICAL SERVICES**

Sec.
1351.
Declaration of purpose.
1352.
Definitions.
1353.
Selection of designated agency.
1354.
Five-year plan; annual technical services program.
1355.
Conditions precedent to acceptance of plans and programs for review and approval by Secretary.
1356.
Review and approval of plans and programs by Secretary.
1357.
Interstate cooperation in administration and coordination of plans and programs.
1358.
Consent of Congress for interstate compacts; reservation of right to alter, amend, or repeal.
1359.
Advisory councils for technical services; appointment; functions; compensation and expenses.
1360.
Appropriations and payments.
1361.
Reference services to assist designated agencies to obtain information outside State.
1362.
Rules and regulations.
1363.
Prohibition against control over educational institutions; functions or responsibilities of other departments not affected.
1364.
Annual report by designated agencies to Secretary; reports by Secretary to President and Congress.
1365.
Public committee; appointment; functions; report.
1366.
Termination of payments for noncompliance with law or diversion of funds.
1367.
Repayments.
1368.
Records.
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.7 Multiple fractions. ( a ) When a biological product contains more than one immunogenic fraction, the completed product shall be evaluated by tests applicable to each fraction.
( b ) When similar potency tests are required for more than one fraction of a combination biological product, different animals must be used to evaluate each fraction except when written Standard Requirements or outlines of production make provisions and set forth conditions for use of the same animals for testing different fractions.
( c ) When the same safety test is required for more than one fraction, requirements are fulfilled by satisfactory results from one test of the completed product.
( d ) When an inactivated fraction(s) is used as a diluent for a live virus fraction(s), the inactivated fraction(s) may be tested separately and the live virus fraction(s) may be tested separately: *Provided,* That, the viricidal test requirements prescribed in § 113.100 are complied with.
( e ) Virus titrations for a multivirus product shall be conducted by methods which will quantitate each virus.
[34 FR 18004, Nov. 7, 1969, as amended at 40 FR 46093, Oct. 6, 1975; 56 FR 66785, Dec. 26, 1991]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Managementaccountability review of the Boeing KC-767A tanker program**** 
SuDocNumber:D1.2:T 15
ItemNumber:0306(online)
CGPSystem Number:000599648
 
 - FOIA-Tanker1.pdfFOIA-Tanker2.pdfFOIA-Tanker3.pdfFOIA-Tanker4.pdfFOIA-Tanker5.pdf
 
 **
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 41404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17224]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, July 18, 2012, 9:30 a.m.. Eastern Time.

Place: Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office 
Building, 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC 20507.

Status: The meeting will be open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    Open Session:
    1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and
    2. Public Input into the Development of EEOC's Strategic 
Enforcement Plan.

    Note:  In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. Seating is limited and it is suggested that visitors arrive 
30 minutes before the meeting in order to be processed through 
security and escorted to the meeting room. (In addition to 
publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the Federal 
Register, the Commission also provides information about Commission 
meetings on its Web site, eeoc.gov., and provides a recorded 
announcement a week in advance on future Commission sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation and Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART) services at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. 
Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the 
voice and TTY numbers listed above. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE 
INFORMATION: Bernadette B. Wilson, Acting Executive Officer on (202) 
663-4077.

    Dated: July 11, 2012.
Bernadette B. Wilson,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2012-17224 Filed 7-11-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
Exhibit 10.1 -- Business Lease Amendment



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Business Lease Amendment 
 This Agreement
entered into this 17th date of June, 2008, serves to amend the existing lease between E & E Investments, a Florida General Partnership
and Intellon Corporation, dated July 1, 2006. 
 E & E Investments (Lessor) agrees to extend this above mentioned lease with
Intellon Corporation (Lessee) from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 with the same terms and conditions. 
 Prior to
December 31, 2008, Intellon Corporation and E & E Investments agree to negotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of a new lease agreement. The parties acknowledge that all negotiations shall be non-binding until such time, if any, as
the parties enter into a definitive lease agreement, executed by authorized agents of both parties. If the parties do not enter into a definitive lease agreement, neither party shall be responsible or liable under any legal theory for any lost
revenue or profits or any other commercial or economic loss or for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special or other damages. 
  

					
	As to Lessee	 		 	As to Lessor
	Intellon Corporation	 		 	E & E Investments
			
	 By: /s/ Charles E. Harris
	 		 	 By: /s/ George D. Edwards

	Charles E. Harris, CEO	 		 	George D. Edwards, Partner
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.19


Non-Employee Director Compensation


We currently pay our non-employee directors the following:


•annual retainer of $60,000 
•annual retainer of $85,000 for the Chairperson of the Audit Committee
•annual retainer of $80,000 for the Chairperson of the  Compensation Committee
•annual retainer of $70,000 for the Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee


The equity component of the director's compensation is valued at $150,000.  The annual equity package consists of 50% in stock options and 50% in restricted stock units.   The options become exercisable one year after the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date.  The restricted stock units vest one year from the grant date.