SERVED DECEMBER 13, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION •'" yPJnfi^^^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS - '•rf'''V^RiS^ 

WASHINGTON, DC .1 Oi ^n, . 

IN THE MATTER OF 

THE MAGNI GROUP, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPIOSOOOIO 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2010- 1080 

PROCEDURAL ORDER 

:i i:' - 3 P 2- UO 

In order to expedite the hearing in this matter, the parties shall comply with the 

Procedural Schedule set forth hereinbelow'. The Rules of Practice for this proceeding 

are set forth in 14 C.F.R. Part 13, Subpart G, of the Federal Aviation Regulations^. 

Those rules provide, inter alia, that the Respondent must file a written Answer or motion 

within thirty (30) days after service of the Complaint (14 C.F.R. § 13.209^0), that a 

general denial is deemed a failure to file an Answer (§ 13.209(e)), that failure to file an 

Answer without good cause is deemed an admission of each allegation in the Complaint 

(§4 3.209(f)), and that, absent agreement of the parties, a party seeking an extension of 

time must file a written motion not less than seven (7) days before the document is due, 

absent good cause shown (§ 13.213(a) and (b)). 

More specifically, 14CFR$ 13.209(6) states: 

A person filing an answer shall admit, deny, or state that the person is without 

sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny, each numbered paragraph 

of the complaint. Any statement or allegation contained in the complaint that is 

not specifically denied in the answer may be deemed an admission of the truth of 

that allegation. A general denial of the complaint is deemed a failure to file an 

answer. 

Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also available 

for viewing at http://www. regulations, ^ov. 

^ The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the Rules of Practice, as 

well as other materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: 

htip:/h\'M'wJ'aa.gov/ahoiit/oJJlce_org^headqiiarlers offtces/agc/pol adindicaliou/agc400/civilj?enalty/; see 

also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Titlel4/14tab_02.tpl. In 

addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions 

are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database). For additional 

information, see the Web site. 

1 
Under FAA Order 2150.3B and the Rules governing these proceedings, the 

Agency attorney and the Respondent are encouraged to consider the possibility of 

settlement and compromise of this matter.^ Compromise may be effected with or 

without a finding of violation (14 C.F.R. §13.16 (n)(l)). 

NOTE: This presiding Judge does not require "Discovery" to be served on the 

Judge. Other Judges have different policies, but as long as this case is assigned to the 

undersigned presiding Judge the parties may, but are not required, serve discovery on the 

undersigned. 

The judge will not discuss the case with any party, or its representative on an ex 

parte basis. If a party has a non-substantive matter to discuss, they should contact the 

judge's attorney-advisor, Mr. Ira Leibowitz at (202) 366-2139 (Ira.Leibowitzfgldot.gov). 

Administrative matters may be addressed to the judge's, Legal Assistant, Pat Matthews 

[202-366-5121] (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov). 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

1. Venue shall be Cincinnati, OH.; 

2. On or before April 1,2011, the parties shsill conclude all discovery in^uding, 

but not limited to, depositions, doctunent production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely 

» manner; 

3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the parties shall be prepared to present Hiis case 

at a hearing on or after April 1,2011^, subject to the availability of courtroom 

facilities. 

4. The parties will have the opportamity to file Post-Hearing briefs and ar^iitnents 

pursuant to a schedule to be determined at the hearing. For guidance, the 

following schedule is typically used: Complainant shall file its brief fifieen (15) 

days afler receipt of the transcript; Respondent shall its brief fifteen (15) days 

thereafter; and any rebuttal brief by the Complainant shall be filed sev«ai(7) 

days thereafter. 

5. Settled cases will not be removed from the hearing docket until the iMX>per 

written pleading(s), consistent with the applicable rules,^ is received bV the 

presiding judge.^ 

^ See Linda Jovce Goodman. FAA Docket No. CP89WW)061, Order d^ed May 30, 1989. 

* 14 C.F.R. § 13.221 states: "The administrative law judge shall give each party at least 60 ^ajS notice of 

the date, time and location of the hearing." 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: At any time before or duringa hearing, an agency attorney maytW^lhdmw a 

complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent of the adtninistfiUtve la^v 
The parties are advised that submissions sent to the street address of the U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, may be delayed due to 

screening conducted by the U.S. Postal Service and/or other security agencies 

and may take up to four (4) weeks to be delivered. Additionally, submissions 

may be "irradiated", which affects the quality of submissions. The parties are 

encouraged, but not required, to file submissions by private delivery service, 

facsimile, or email. The certificate of service shall reflect the manner of service. 

yc^wd C. Gboawin 

\.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law Judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice. 

^ See: In the Matter of Lewis Drake & Associates. FAA Docket No. CP03SO0045, DMS. No. FAA-2003-

16379, "Order Terminating Proceeding", served February 26, 2005; citing Kerry James Eldridge. FAA 

Docket CP89GL0458, "Order Canceling Hearing and Terminating Proceeding", served January 16, 1991, 

at 1; In The Matter of Robert Harris FAA Docket No. CP03EA0001. DMS No. FAA-2002-14236., Orders 

dated October 18, 2004 and October 27, 2004. USAIR. Inc.. FAA Docket CP90NE0359. Trans World 

Airlines. Inc.. FAA Dockets CP90GL0085. CP90CE0110. CP90CE0114. CP90CE0134. Order of 

Administrative Law Judge Burton S. Kolko, served April 8, 1992, p. 2. See "Order Dismissing 

Complainant's Appeal". In The Matter of Robert Harris. FAA Docket No. CP03EA0001. DMS No. FAA2005-14, August 15, 2005. 

h '^m 
FAA Docket No. CPIOSOOOIO 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Todd R. Palmer, General Manager 

Magni Industries, Inc., Respondent 

109250 Toebben Drive 

Independence Avenue, KY 41051 

TEL: 859-746-1777 

FAX: 859-746-1170 

Gerald A. Ellis, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southern Region, ASO-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodv^n, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Savice was by U. S, Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the followii^ address: 

Federal Aviation Administratioii, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wri^t Buildin^^^Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.