alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3.140 Care in transit. ( a ) During surface transportation, it shall be the responsibility of the driver or other employee to visually observe the live animals as frequently as circumstances may dictate, but not less than once every 4 hours, to assure that they are receiving sufficient air for normal breathing, their ambient temperatures are within the prescribed limits, all other applicable standards are being complied with and to determine whether any of the live animals are in obvious physical distress and to provide any needed veterinary care as soon as possible. When transported by air, live animals shall be visually observed by the carrier as frequently as circumstances may dictate, but not less than once every 4 hours, if the animal cargo space is accessible during flight. If the animal cargo space is not accessible during flight, the carrier shall visually observe the live animals whenever loaded and unloaded and whenever the animal cargo space is otherwise accessible to assure that they are receiving sufficient air for normal breathing, their ambient temperatures are within the prescribed limits, all other applicable standards are being complied with and to determine whether any such live animals are in obvious physical distress. The carrier shall provide any needed veterinary care as soon as possible. No animal in obvious physical distress shall be transported in commerce.
( b ) Wild or otherwise dangerous animals shall not be taken from their primary enclosure except under extreme emergency conditions: *Provided, however,* That a temporary primary enclosure may be used, if available, and such temporary primary enclosure is structurally strong enough to prevent the escape of the animal. During the course of transportation, in commerce, live animals shall not be removed from their primary enclosures unless placed in other primary enclosures or facilities conforming to the requirements provided in this subpart.
| Subsidiary                                          | Jurisdiction of      Incorporation | Principal      Activity                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |                               |                                            |
| Atuel      Fideicomisos S.A. and subsidiary         | Republic      of Argentina         | Trust      services                             |
| Francés      Valores Sociedad de Bolsa S.A.    | Republic      of Argentina         | Stock      exchange brokerage                   |
| Consolidar      Cía. de Seguros de Retiro S.A. | Republic      of Argentina         | Insurance                                       |
| Consolidar      Seguros de Vida S.A.                | Republic      of Argentina         | Insurance                                       |
| Consolidar      AFJP S.A.                           | Republic      of Argentina         | Pension      and Retirement Fund Administrators |
| PSA      Compañía Financiera S.A.         | Republic      of Argentina         | Financial      Institution                      |
| Rombo      Compañía Financiera S.A.       | Republic      of Argentina         | Financial      Institution                      |
| Consolidar      ART S.A.                            | Republic      of Argentina         | Workers      Compensation Insurance             |
| BBVA      Consolidar Seguros S.A.                   | Republic      of Argentina         | Insurance      Company                          |

----
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

CDC Issues Guidance Ordering Halt in Tenant Residential Evictions to Further 

Prevent the Spread of COVID

WASHINGTON, Sept. 4, 2020 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary 

for Rural Development Bette Brand today announced that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

(CDC) has ordered a halt in residential evictions through Dec. 31, 2020, to tenants meeting certain criteria in 

USDA multi-family housing properties.

The CDC guidance applies to tenants who certify that they meet the following criteria:

• All adults in the household have attempted to obtain any available government assistance for rent;

• The household meets income limits of $99,000 per individual or $198,000 per couple;

• The household is unable to pay full rent due to a loss in household income or extraordinary medical 

expenses;

• Timely partial payments have been attempted;

• Eviction would likely make the household homeless or force them into an unsafe shared living 

arrangement.

If properties are experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19 and tenant inability to pay, USDA will 

continue to accept forbearance requests under the 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security 

(CARES) Act through Dec. 31, 2020. 

To review our previously posted Multifamily Housing questions and answers on the CARES Act forbearance 

and COVID-19 in general, please visit the Rural Development COVID-19 Response website. 

For additional information, see page 55292 of the September 4 Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
S. 1236

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for commencement of the

construction of the Arrowrock Dam Hydroelectric Project in the State of Idaho.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period specified

in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would

otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

project numbered 4656, the Commission may, at the request of

the licensee for the project and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the Commission’s procedures under that

section, extend the time period during which the licensee is required

to commence the construction of the project for three consecutive

2-year periods.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take effect on the

date of the expiration of the extension issued by the Commission

prior to the date of the enactment of this Act under section 13

of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).

(c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the period

required for commencement of construction of the project described

in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of the enactment

of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the license effective
S. 1236—2

as of the date of its expiration and the first extension authorized

under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marshall
Holdings International, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2008, I,
Richard A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of Marshall Holdings International,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:





1.           Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Marshall Holdings
International, Inc.





Dated:
August 19, 2008.








/s/ Richard A.
      BaileyRichard
      A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer ofMarshall
      Holdings International, Inc.
<PAGE>
                                                              EXHIBIT 12.1




                      TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

             CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Years Ended September 30,
                                ------------------------------------------
                                 1997     1996     1995      1994     1993
                                ------   ------   ------     ----     ----
                                           (Dollars in Millions)
<S>                             <C>      <C>      <C>        <C>      <C>

Consolidated income
   before income taxes......    $  283   $  260   $  300     $293     $255
                                ------   ------   ------     ----     ----
Fixed Charges
   Interest.................       918      819      716      486      454
   Portion of rent expense
      representative of the
      interest factor (deemed 
      to be one-third).......        4        3        2        3        3
                                ------   ------   ------     ----     ----

Total fixed charges.........       922      822      718      489      457
                                ------   ------   ------     ----     ----
Earnings available
   for fixed charges........    $1,205   $1,082   $1,018     $782     $712
                                ======   ======   ======     ====     ====

Ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges<F1>........      1.31     1.32     1.42     1.60     1.56
                                  ====     ====     ====     ====     ====

<FN>
-----------------

<F1>   TMCC has guaranteed certain obligations of affiliates and subsidiaries
as discussed in Note 15 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.  As of
September 30, 1997, TMCC has not incurred any fixed charges in connection with
such guarantees and no amount is included in any ratio of earnings to fixed
charges.  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for TMS and subsidiaries was
1.92, 1.49, 1.74, 1.90 and 2.07 for the years ended September 30, 1997, 1996,
1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for
TMMNA and subsidiaries was 65.52 for the year ended September 30, 1997.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 24

                         Annual Reports on Form 10-K of
                   Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd.

                                POWER-OF-ATTORNEY


The undersigned, as a Director of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd., a
New York corporation (the "Company"), does hereby constitute and appoint each of
Robert P. Cochran, Roger K. Taylor and Bruce E. Stern to be his agent and
attorney-in-fact, with the power to act fully hereunder and with full power of
substitution to act in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, (i) to sign in
the name and on behalf of the undersigned, as Director of the Company, and file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, an Annual Report on Form 10-K for
each fiscal year for which the Company is required to file such an Annual
Report, and any amendments or supplements thereto, and (ii) to execute and
deliver any instruments, certificates or other documents which he shall deem
necessary or proper in connection with the filing of each such Annual Report on
Form 10-K, and any such amendment or supplement thereto, and generally to act
for and in the name of the undersigned with respect to each such filing as fully
as could the undersigned if then personally present and acting. The foregoing
Power-of-Attorney shall be in full force and effect for so long as the
undersigned shall be a Director of the Company, unless and until revoked by
written instrument delivered to the General Counsel of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power-of-Attorney on the
date set forth below.


Dated: February 26, 1998                       /s/ Richard A. Post
                                            -------------------------
                                                   Richard A. Post
# C_2010260EN.01002701.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/27

---

Action brought on 1 July 2010 — De Roos-Le Large v Commission

(Case F-50/10)

()

2010/C 260/36

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Simone Thérèse De Roos-Le Large ('s Hertogenbosch, Netherlands) (represented by: E. Lutjens and M.H. van Loon, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision ordering the applicant to repay the amount of the survivor’s pension overpaid to her late mother

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul, pursuant to Article 264 TFEU, the Commission’s decision of 12 May 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, pursuant to Article 264 TFEU, the Commission’s decision of 12 May 2010;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### § 314.11 Handling of certain condemned products for purposes other than human food.

Condemned carcasses of animals affected with one or more of the following conditions may be shipped from an official establishment only for purposes other than human food and only if permission therefor is obtained from the circuit supervisor: Anasarca, Ocular Squamous Cell Carcinoma (after removal of neoplastic tissue), emaciation, eosinophilic myositis, immaturity, nonseptic bruises and injuries, and sarcosporidiosis. This provision also applies to unborn calves and to products such as paunches and udders when they have not been handled as required under this subchapter for products for human food purposes; provided, such articles have not been condemned for other pathological reasons. Such permission will be granted only if all parts to be so used will be promptly handled, freely slashed and adequately identified as required by § 325.13(a)(2) of this subchapter. The slashing, identification and packing of the product shall be accomplished in an inedible product area under the supervision of an inspector. Facilities must be adequate so that the carcasses or parts saved under these provisions are not contaminated with pus, manure, septic, or toxic materials, or similar substances. The operation must not result in unsanitary conditions within the establishment.

[35 FR 15575, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 36 FR 11639, June 17, 1971; 36 FR 11903, June 23, 1971]
#### § 9409.12 Procedure when a decision is not made prior to the time a response is required.

If a response to a demand or request is required before the General Counsel's decision is received, a U.S. attorney or a Commission attorney designated for the purpose shall appear with the employee or former employee of the Commission upon whom the demand has been made and shall furnish the court or other authority with a copy of the regulations contained in this part and inform the court or other authority that the demand has been, or is being, as the case may be, referred for the prompt consideration of the appropriate Commission official and shall respectfully request the court or authority to stay the demand pending receipt of the requested instructions.
#### In the Matter of Joseph DiNapoli et al., Respondents, v Peak Automotive, Inc., Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 424]

*675In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award, Peak Automotive, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated May 19, 2005, as denied its cross motion to vacate the award, and granted that branch of the petitioners’ motion which was for leave to renew their prior motion to confirm the award and, upon renewal, confirmed the award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“Vacatur of an arbitration award is strictly limited to the reasons stated in CPLR 7511 (b), but where the parties have submitted to compulsory arbitration, the award must have evidentiary support and cannot be arbitrary or capricious if it is to be upheld” *(Cigna Prop. & Cas. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,*12 AD3d 198, 199 [2004]).

The appellant concedes that the warranty period on the subject vehicle extended until September 26, 2002, or until 62,714 miles was recorded on the odometer of the vehicle, whichever occurred first. The evidence before the arbitrator established that, during the period in which the vehicle was under warranty, it was out of service for repairs for well over 15 days including periods when the vehicle would not start and the “check engine” light was on. Accordingly, the conclusion that the appellant failed to correct a malfunction or defect involving . the engine which substantially impaired the value of the vehicle is supported by the evidence and the presumption set forth in General Business Law § 198-b (c) (2) (b). Moreover, the arbitrator’s conclusion that “[t]he vehicle is primarily used for personal, family or household purposes” was supported by testimony in the record which was not refuted by the petitioners’ acknowledgment that it was used on occasion for business purposes *(see generally Matter of Volkswagen of Am. v Friedman,*166 AD2d 709 [1990]). We further note that newly discovered evidence is not a basis for vacating an arbitrator’s award *(see Matter of Meehan v Nassau Community Coll.,*242 *676AD2d 155, 157 [1998]; *Matter of Hirsch Constr. Corp. [Cooper],*181 AD2d 52, 55 [1992]).

Since the appellant failed to demonstrate a basis for vacating the arbitrator’s award *(see*CPLR 7511; *Motor Veh. Mfrs. Assn. of U.S. v State of New York,*75 NY2d 175, 186 [1990]; *Matter of Lurie v Sobus,*289 AD2d 578, 578 [2001]), upon renewal, the award was properly confirmed *(see*CPLR 7510). Florio, J.P., Miller, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
### §1502. Definitions

For the purposes of this chapter, the term—

(1) "debtor" means an entity that is the subject of a foreign proceeding;

(2) "establishment" means any place of operations where the debtor carries out a nontransitory economic activity;

(3) "foreign court" means a judicial or other authority competent to control or supervise a foreign proceeding;

(4) "foreign main proceeding" means a foreign proceeding pending in the country where the debtor has the center of its main interests;

(5) "foreign nonmain proceeding" means a foreign proceeding, other than a foreign main proceeding, pending in a country where the debtor has an establishment;

(6) "trustee" includes a trustee, a debtor in possession in a case under any chapter of this title, or a debtor under chapter 9 of this title;

(7) "recognition" means the entry of an order granting recognition of a foreign main proceeding or foreign nonmain proceeding under this chapter; and

(8) "within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States", when used with reference to property of a debtor, refers to tangible property located within the territory of the United States and intangible property deemed under applicable nonbankruptcy law to be located within that territory, including any property subject to attachment or garnishment that may properly be seized or garnished by an action in a Federal or State court in the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 135.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
# C_2011013EN.01001902.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge (Belgium) lodged on 19 October 2010 — Vlaamse Oliemaatschappij v F.O.D. Financiën

(Case C-499/10)

()

2011/C 13/34

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vlaamse Oliemaatschappij

Applicant:

Defendant: F.O.D. Financiën

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the former Article 21(3) of the Sixth Directive (77/388), (1) now incorporated in Article 205 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (2) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, in conjunction with Articles 202 and 157(1)(b) of the same Directive, authorise the Member States to provide that a warehouse-keeper other than a customs warehouse-keeper is jointly and severally liable, unconditionally, for the tax which is owing on a supply of goods made for valuable consideration by the owner of the goods who is liable for the tax on those goods, even where the warehouse-keeper acts in good faith or where no fault or negligence can be imputed to him (Article 51a(3) of the Wetboek van de belasting over toegevoegde waarde (WBTW).

1

2

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1)

1

(2)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1

2

---
§ 311.13 Pigmentary conditions; melanosis, xanthosis, ochronosis, etc. ( a ) Except as provided in § 311.19, carcasses of livestock showing generalized pigmentary deposits shall be condemned.
( b ) The affected parts of carcasses showing localized pigmentary deposits of such character as to be unwholesome or otherwise adulterated shall be removed and condemned.