alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Adrianna Malafronte et al., Appellants, v Amee Ford et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 350]

In an action to recover dam ages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated July 11, 2005, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and, in effect, denied their cross motion for leave to amend their verified bill of particulars.

*436Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiffs did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether they sustained a serious injury. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

In light of the foregoing, we do not reach the plaintiffs’ remaining contention. Adams, J.E, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF

COLGANAIR, INC. FAA DOCKET NO. CP09EA0018 (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2009-0582

RESPONSE OF COLGAN AIR, INC. AND PINNACLE AIRLINES CORP. TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND REQUEST FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION Respondent Colgan Air, Inc. and Pinnacle Airlines Corp. (collectively "Pinnacle") hereby respond to the AprilS, 2013, "Order ofChiefAdministrative Law Judge to Show Cause Why Default Should Notbe Entered for Failure to Comply with Orders," and the response state as follows: Pinnacle is currently in discussions with the FAA'sRegional Counsel regarding a negotiated resolution ofthis matter, andthese discussions are nearing completion. Inorder that these discussions may continue, and that a negotiated resolution ofthis matter may be successfully concluded, Pinnacle respectfully requests a 30-day extension ofthe return date on the Court's show cause order.WHEREFORE, Colgan Air, Inc. and Pinnacle Airlines Corp., by counsel, respectfully request thatthe Administrative Law Judge grant their request for a 30-day extension. Dated: April 30, 2013 Respectfully submitted, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP By:

# H~

# 4**·YilW~~d;.::J)'tL** Mark A. Dornbroff McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP 1676 International Drive Penthouse McLean, Virginia 22102 Tel: (703) 336-8700 Fax: (703) 336-8750 Counsel for Respondent ColganAir, Inc.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certifythat on this 30th day ofApril, 2013, copies ofthe foregoing Response of Colgan Air, Inc. were sent viapersonal courier to:

Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2Wl000 Washington, DC 20591 The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, ChiefAdministrative Law Judge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M20, Room El2-320 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FAX: 202-366-7536 and via facsimile and UPS overnight delivery to: Christian L. Lewerenz Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, New York 11434 TEL: 718-553-3273 FAX: 718-995-5699
# C_2007121EN.01000101.xml

| 1.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 May 2007

(2007/C 121/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3453 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4488 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68005 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2945 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6477 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,94 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1195 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5832 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,324 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8152 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2716 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,968 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7775 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6269 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4388 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5055 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8312 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0584 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 248,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,611 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,287 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,314 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 879 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,572 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,22 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,828 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,337 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3453

JPY

Japanese yen

163,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4488

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68005

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2945

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6477

ISK

Iceland króna

82,94

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1195

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5832

CZK

Czech koruna

28,324

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8152

RON

Romanian leu

3,2716

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,968

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7775

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6269

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4388

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5055

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8312

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0584

KRW

South Korean won

1 248,17

ZAR

South African rand

9,611

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,287

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,314

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 879

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,572

PHP

Philippine peso

62,22

RUB

Russian rouble

34,828

THB

Thai baht

44,337

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Proceedings ofthe annual Software Engineering Workshop.**** 
SuDocNumber:NAS1.15:, NAS 1.26:
ItemNumber:0830-D(online), 0830-H-14 (online)
CGPSystem Number:000863858
 
1978
1980
1981
1982
1983
1985
1986
1988
1989
1990
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
 
 
 **
### §5228. Funding

For the purpose of the authorities granted in this chapter, and for the costs of administering those authorities, the Secretary may use the proceeds of the sale of any securities issued under chapter 31 of title 31, and the purposes for which securities may be issued under chapter 31 of title 31 are extended to include actions authorized by this chapter, including the payment of administrative expenses. Any funds expended or obligated by the Secretary for actions authorized by this chapter, including the payment of administrative expenses, shall be deemed appropriated at the time of such expenditure or obligation.

(Pub. L. 110–343, div. A, title I, §118, Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3786.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act" and was translated as reading "this division", meaning div. A of Pub. L. 110–343, Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3765, known as the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. For complete classification of division A to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5201 of this title and Tables.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           21556
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           00000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 10000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      47653
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           29802
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             30336
<LOANS>                                         430508
<ALLOWANCE>                                       6696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  569020
<DEPOSITS>                                      486831
<SHORT-TERM>                                      1676
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               6255
<LONG-TERM>                                       2100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5535
<OTHER-SE>                                       37032
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  569020
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   9629
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  944
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   430
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 11003
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                4830
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5122
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5881
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      375
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 157
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   5409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3229
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3229
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.56
<LOANS-NON>                                       3699
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1129
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  5921
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      326
<RECOVERIES>                                        76
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 6696
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              6696
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1200
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GENE HINTON FOLDS, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-87

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 20, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Hunter Carroll, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Bilal Ahmed Faruqui,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SLEET, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
### §4b. Deputy Comptroller for the supervision and examination of Federal savings associations

The Comptroller of the Currency shall designate a Deputy Comptroller, who shall be responsible for the supervision and examination of Federal savings associations.

(R.S. §327B, as added Pub. L. 111–203, title III, §314(b), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1524.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the transfer date, see section 314(d) of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.
# C_2011072EN.01000901.xml

| 5.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/9

---

Appeal brought on 13th December 2010 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 30th September 2010 in Case T-85/09: Yassin Abdullah Kadi v European Commission

(Case C-584/10 P)

2011/C 72/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: P. Hetsch, S. Boelaert, E. Paasivirta, and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Yassin Abdullah Kadi, Council of the European Union, French Republic, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellants claims that the Court should:

| — | Set aside, in whole, the contested judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside, in whole, the contested judgment;

| — | Dismiss Yassin Abdullah Kadi's application for the annulment of Commission adopted Regulation No 1190/2008 (1) insofar as it concerns him, as unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Dismiss Yassin Abdullah Kadi's application for the annulment of Commission adopted Regulation No 1190/2008 (1) insofar as it concerns him, as unfounded;

1

| — | Order that Yassin Abdullah Kadi pays the Commission's costs of this appeal and the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that Yassin Abdullah Kadi pays the Commission's costs of this appeal and the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that the General Court's findings are vitiated by errors of law, as they are based on a legally erroneous standard for judicial review. The pleas of the Commission are as follows:

1.   Pleas relating to the General Court's findings on the applicable standard of judicial review: The Commission submits that the standard of judicial review adopted by the General Court is legally erroneous because the Court of Justice has not settled the precise standard of judicial review applicable to this case and because the particular standard of judicial review adopted by the General Court cannot be required from the EU.

2.   Pleas relating to the General Court's findings on the infringement of the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection and to the infringement of the principle of proportionality: The Commission argues that the General Court erroneously held that the procedures applied by the Commission did not fulfil the fundamental rights requirements for this type of restrictive measures regime; that the GC erroneously dismissed the Commission's argument regarding the domestic proceedings brought by Mr Kadi in the United States; and that the GC erroneously dismissed the Commission's arguments regarding the administrative review and re-examination procedures established pursuant to UNSC Resolutions 1822(2008) and 1904(2009) – including the Focal Point procedure and the Office of the Ombudsperson.

---

(1)  OJ L 322, p. 25

1

---
**EXHIBIT
        23.1**
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 The
        Board
        of Directors and Stockholders
 of
        Clarus
        Corporation
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
        on Form
        S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-42600, 333-42602, 333-42604, 333-42606, 333-59193,
        333-71838 and 333-127686) and on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-90077) of
        Clarus
        Corporation of our reports dated March 13, 2007, with respect to the
        consolidated balance sheets of Clarus Corporation and subsidiaries as of
        December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
        operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for
        each
        of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the related
        financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness
        of
        internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the
        effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December
        31,
        2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form
        10-K
        of Clarus Corporation.
  Our
        report on the consolidated financial statements
        refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
        123(R), "Share Based Payment," as of January 1, 2006.
 /s/ *KPMG
                  LLP**KPMG
                  LLPStamford, ConnecticutMarch 13,
                  2007*
 
  50
Exhibit 14.4

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-111779) and the Registration Statement on Form F-4 (No. 333-112948) of MILLICOM INTERNATIONAL CELLULAR, S.A.of our report dated June 30, 2004 relating to the financial statements ofCOMUNICACIONES
CELULARES, S.A.,which appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Millicom International Cellular, S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/
Robert Reyes
Robert Reyes
Director Partner BDO-AUDITORES Y CONSULTORES, S.A.June 30, 2004

Exh 14.4-1

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated February 21, 1997 (except with respect to the Facility and the
BellSouth Transaction discussed in Notes 1 and 7, as to which the date is 
March 18, 1997), included in this Form 10-K into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8, File No. 33-86010 and Form S-8, File No.
333-05385. 


                                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 25, 1997
§ 3.10 Watering. ( a ) Potable water must be continuously available to the dogs, unless restricted by the attending veterinarian or except as provided in § 3.17(a).
( b ) If potable water is not continuously available to the cats, it must be offered to the cats as often as necessary to ensure their health and well-being, but not less than twice daily for at least 1 hour each time, unless restricted by the attending veterinarian.
( c ) Water receptacles must be kept clean and sanitized in accordance with § 3.11(b) and before being used to water a different dog or cat or a different social grouping of dogs or cats.
[85 FR 28798, May 13, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-22-1997
<CASH>                                           5,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,471
<INVENTORY>                                     44,532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,185
<PP&E>                                          67,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,196
<BONDS>                                         60,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,890
<SALES>                                        120,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,050
<CGS>                                           90,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       801
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,258)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        


</TABLE>
§ 300.4 Organizational terminology; personnel. ( a ) Unless otherwise specifically provided or required in the context of a particular part of the regulations: *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Food Safety and Inspection Service or any other officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has been or may in the future be delegated to act in his or her stead.
*Circuit Supervisor* means the official of the Inspection Service who is assigned responsibility for supervising the conduct of inspection at a specific group of official establishments.
Inspection program, inspection service, or program means the organizational unit within the Department with responsibility for carrying out the FMIA, the PPIA, and the EPIA.
Inspection program employee, inspection service employee, or program employee means an inspector or other government employee who is authorized to conduct any inspection or perform any other duty in connection with the inspection program, inspection service, or program.
Inspection service supervisor or Inspection program supervisor means an inspection program or service employee or program employee who is delegated authority to exercise supervision over one or more phases of the inspection program.
*Inspector* means an inspector of the inspection program, inspection service, and program. (“Inspector” includes an employee or official of the Federal government or the government of a State or territory or the District of Columbia who is authorized by the Administrator to inspect meat and meat products or poultry and poultry products under the authority of the FMIA or the PPIA, respectively, under an agreement entered into between the Administrator and the appropriate State or other agency.)
Inspector in charge or IIC means an inspection program employee, inspection service employee, or program employee who has primary responsibility for inspection program functions at a particular official establishment.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States or his or her delegate.
( b ) FSIS has replaced the regional office and import field office structure referenced in some parts of subchapter A of this chapter. Authority previously delegated to Regional Directors now is delegated to district managers; authority previously delegated to area supervisors and import supervisors now is delegated to inspection program supervisors in the successor district offices.
[69 FR 253, Jan. 5, 2004]