alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month
period ending October 27, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         () The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By:  /s/ Lawrence Tierney
     --------------------
     Lawrence Tierney
     Principal Accounting Officer
     December 12, 2007
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marshall
Holdings International, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008,
I, Elwood Sprenger, Chief Executive Officer of Marshall Holdings International,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:
  1.           Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.           The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Marshall Holdings
International, Inc.





Dated:
November 19, 2008.





/s/ Elwood
    SprengerElwood
      Sprenger, Chief Executive Officer ofMarshall
      Holdings International,
Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                             448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   448
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,986)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       448
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (17)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,488)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0





</TABLE>
### §§1281, 1282. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Section 1281, Pub. L. 87–221, §1, Sept. 13, 1961, 75 Stat. 494, related to willful destruction or injury, or attempted destruction or injury, of property moving in interstate or foreign commerce in possession of common or contract carriers, penalties for such acts, and proof of interstate or foreign nature of property. See section 80501 of Title 49, Transportation.

Section 1282, Pub. L. 87–221, §2, Sept. 13, 1961, 75 Stat. 494, provided that judgment of conviction or acquittal on merits under laws of any State or possession, District of Columbia, or Puerto Rico, was bar to prosecution under this chapter for same acts. See section 80501 of Title 49.
-  Home 

# Approvals Safety Evaluation Forms

Approvals_Safety_Evaluation_Kit1.pdf (251.81 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of FTS Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") of
the  Company  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  the  Company.



Dated:  July  18,  2005



                  /s/  Scott  Gallagher
                  --------------------
                  Scott  Gallagher,  Chief  Executive  Officer



Dated:  July  18,  2005



                  /s/  Linda  Ehlen
                  -----------------
                  Linda  Ehlen,  Chief  Financial  Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Russell, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 684]

*851Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.), rendered May 3, 2004, convicting him of assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the defendant’s conviction of assault in the first degree and the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence at trial established that, in an act of domestic violence, the defendant punched the complainant some 20 times, causing, inter alia, the loss of her right eye. Without objection, the trial court submitted to the jury, inter aha, one count of assault in the first degree charging that the defendant caused the victim serious physical injury by recklessly engaging in conduct creating a grave risk of death under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life *(see*Penal Law § 120.10 [3]), and one count of assault in the second degree charging that he intentionally inflicted serious physical injury *(see*Penal Law § 120.05 [1]). The jury convicted the defendant of both counts and the defendant was sentenced, as a persistent violent felony offender, to two concurrent terms of 20 years’ to life imprisonment.

Although unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]), the defendant’s contention that the evidence at trial was legally insufficient to establish the crime of depraved indifference assault has merit and, under the circumstances of this case, we reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals has taught that, except in rare and extraordinary circumstances, not present here, one person’s attack on another, no matter how violent or how great the risk of harm it creates, does not rise to the level of depravity and indifference to life contemplated by the statutes defining crimes committed under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life *(see People v Suarez,*6 NY3d 202 [2005]; *People v McMillon,*31 AD3d 136 [2006]). Thus, the defendant *852did not commit the assault in the first degree of which he was convicted *(see People v Swinton,*7 NY3d 776 [2006]).

Moreover, evidence that the defendant punched the complainant 20 times was legally insufficient to establish that he recklessly, rather than intentionally, caused her injuries *(see People v Gonzalez,*1 NY3d 464 [2004]; *People v Hafeez,*100 NY2d 253 [2003] ), and therefore, under the circumstances presented, we do not reduce the assault in the first degree conviction to one of assault in the third degree *(cf. People v Swinton, supra; People v Atkinson,*7 NY3d 765 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Adams, J.E, Skelos, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
# C_2011072EN.01000802.xml

| 5.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 9 December 2010 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën, other party: G. Frank

(Case C-580/10)

2011/C 72/13

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Appellant:

Other party: G. Frank

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

In the light of Article 18 EC (now Article 21 TFEU), does Community law govern a situation in which a Member State levies a tax on the first use on the road network in its territory of a vehicle which is registered in another Member State, has been borrowed from a resident of that other Member State and has been driven for private purposes in the territory of the first Member State by a person who is a resident of that Member State but a national of the other Member State?

---
# C_2007091EN.01002501.xml

| 26.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/25

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 April 2007

(2007/C 91/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3649 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4511 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68100 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1746 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6416 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,34 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1640 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5820 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,106 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7000 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7864 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3315 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8168 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6405 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5298 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6702 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8321 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0629 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 264,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5817 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,5317 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3745 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 396,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6686 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,498 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0650 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3649

JPY

Japanese yen

161,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4511

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68100

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1746

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6416

ISK

Iceland króna

87,34

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1640

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5820

CZK

Czech koruna

28,106

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7000

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7864

RON

Romanian leu

3,3315

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,655

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8168

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6405

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5298

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6702

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8321

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0629

KRW

South Korean won

1 264,92

ZAR

South African rand

9,5817

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,5317

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3745

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 396,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6686

PHP

Philippine peso

64,498

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0650

THB

Thai baht

44,200

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### §3711. Appointment or wartime promotion; retention of grade upon release from active duty

(a) A member of the Reserve on active duty, who is appointed or promoted under section 2104 or 2125 of this title, is entitled upon release from that duty to the highest grade satisfactorily held by reason of that appointment or promotion. The Secretary shall determine the highest grade satisfactorily held.

(b) Unless otherwise entitled to a higher grade, a member recalled to active duty shall be recalled in the grade in which released under subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 96–322, §1, Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1006, §710; renumbered §3711 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§118(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4233, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 759a of this title prior to the complete revision of former chapter 21 of this title by Pub. L. 96–322.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §118(b), renumbered section 710 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2104 or 2125" for "section 214 or 275".
# C_2011055EN.01001802.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 29 November 2010 — Deli Ostrich NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-559/10)

2011/C 55/32

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Deli Ostrich NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

The Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen asks the Court of Justice to give a ruling on which tariff subheading should be applied, as at the date of the declaration of 22 October 2007, in respect of import duties on meat from camels which, indisputably, are not kept in captivity.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0001005229
<NAME>                  COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                               4,548
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      131,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,430
<INVENTORY>                                        105,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   279,199
<PP&E>                                             114,779
<DEPRECIATION>                                      33,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     757,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               94,678
<BONDS>                                            446,868
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               137
<OTHER-SE>                                         171,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       757,937
<SALES>                                            170,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   170,503
<CGS>                                              127,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      127,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    23,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     12,072
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5,989
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,083
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,083
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .45
        

</TABLE>
§ 9428.6 Chief state election official. ( a ) Each chief state election official shall certify to the Commission within 30 days after July 25, 1994: ( 1 ) All voter registration eligibility requirements of that state and their corresponding state constitution or statutory citations, including but not limited to the specific state requirements, if any, relating to minimum age, length of residence, reasons to disenfranchise such as criminal conviction or mental incompetence, and whether the state is a closed primary state.
( 2 ) Any voter identification number that the state requires or requests; and
( 3 ) Whether the state requires or requests a declaration of race/ethnicity;
( 4 ) The state's deadline for accepting voter registration applications; and
( 5 ) The state election office address where the application shall be mailed.
( b ) If a state, in accordance with 11 CFR 9428.4(a)(2), requires the applicant's full social security number, the chief state election official shall provide the Commission with the text of the state's privacy statement required under the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a note).
( c ) Each chief state election official shall notify the Commission, in writing, within 30 days of any change to the state's voter eligibility requirements or other information reported under this section.
[59 FR 32323, June 23, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 35720, July 29, 2009]
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six month
period ending January 29, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:      /s/ Lawrence Tierney
         ---------------------------
         Lawrence Tierney
         Principal Financial Officer
         March 11, 2005
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-16-2006

In Re: Don Richards

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 05-5516

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Don Richards " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1099.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1099
HPS-23 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 05-5516

________________

IN RE: DON RICHARDS

 Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Virgin Islands

(Related to D.V.I. Civil No. 01-cv-00212 )

_____________________________________

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. Pro.

January 27, 2006

Before: CHIEF JUDGE SCIRICA, WEIS and GARTH, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

Filed May 16, 2006 

_____________________

OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM.

Don Richards petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the District Court

of the Virgin Islands to rule on his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate or correct

his conviction. As the District Court denied the § 2255 motion on April 26, 2006, we will

deny the instant petition as moot.