alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 8 

Ref: 8EPR-ERP 

Doug Goering 

Agriculture Commissioner 

"Jorth Dakota Department of Agriculture 

600 East Boulevard Avenue 

Bismarck. North Dakota 58505-0020 

Dear Comrmssioncr Goering: 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

DENVER, CO 80202-1129 

Phone 800-227-8917 

http://www.epa.gov/region08 

DEC 1 3 ~J2 

1l1c Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received your request to James Martin, dated September 13. 2012, 

for approval of delegation of the Risk Management Program (RMP) for agricultural anhydrous ammonia facilities in 

North Dakota. J wanted to let you knO\\ that we have been reviewing the documents contained in your request and 

coordinating v.rith members of the North Dakota Department of Agriculture and the North Dakota Attorney General's 

office. 

In additiOn, 1 wanted to point out some of the steps that arc required for approval of a request for assumption of the 

RMP program. They arc: 

I) a determination of the completeness of the request for approval, based on the criteria in Subpart E of 

40 CFR Part 63. including an initial review of the authorities. statutes, regulations. and funding 

necessary for state assumption and operation of the RMP program: 

2) an opportunity for the State to address any deficient clements that may be identified in step I~ 

3) a recommendation (if appropriate) for approval from the Region: 

4) an opportunity for review by our Headquarters· program and counsel offices 

5) a public notice and comment period of at least 30 days; and 

6) final approval by Region 8 (if applicable). 

I wanted to let you know that we arc currently working on the first step of the process-determining the completeness 

of the request for approval your Department submitted to us. We will let you know if there is anything additional that 

we will need prior to making that detennination. Once that is done, we will continue to work in a timely manner to 

complete the steps that occur within the Region and to work with our Headquarters office on the other steps. We look 

forward to working with you and your Department toward the fonna l assumption of the RMP program for agricultural 

anhydrous ammonia facilities. If you have any questions, please contact Kathie Atencio, Preparedness Unit Chief. at 

303-312-6803. 

Sincerely, 

. I . . (J /V ~'--- ~ t__..;-\ 

Martin Hestmark 

Assistant Regional Administrator 

Office of Ecosystems Protection and Remediation
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ending January 27, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Herndon, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/Carl Herndon
    ---------------------------
    Carl Herndon
    Principal Executive Officer
    July 17, 2003
§ 309.5 Swine; disposal because of hog cholera. ( a ) All swine found by an inspector to be affected with hog cholera shall be identified as U.S. Condemned and disposed of in accordance with § 309.13. Immediate notification shall be given by the inspector to the official in the Veterinary Services unit of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service who has responsibility for the control of swine diseases in the State where the swine are located.
( b ) All swine, even though not themselves identified as U.S. Suspects, which are of lots in which one or more animals have been condemned or identified as U.S. Suspect for hog cholera, shall, as far as possible, be slaughtered separately and apart from all other livestock passed on ante-mortem inspection.
[40 FR 27225, June 27, 1975]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

CENTER TRUST, INC.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

KING MINERAL, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE I, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE II, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE III, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE IV, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE V, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE VI, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE VII, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE IX, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE 10, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE 11, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE 12, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE 14, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE 15, LLC

CT RETAIL PROPERTIES FINANCE 16, LLC

CT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP

CT FINANCE PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

CT FINANCE, INC.

HAAGEN CENTRAL

VERMONT-SLAUSON SHOPPING CENTER, LTD

WILLOWBROOK CENTER PARTNERSHIP
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of PrincipalExecutive Officer**

**Requiredby Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)**

**of theExchange Act**

** **

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Joseph Loggia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Joseph  Loggia         |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Joseph Loggia              |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer    |   |
|   |                       |   |
|   | Date: August 15, 2005 |   |

 

----
§ 166.2 General restrictions. ( a ) No person shall feed or permit the feeding of garbage to swine unless the garbage is treated to kill disease organisms, pursuant to this part, at a facility operated by a person holding a valid license for the treatment of garbage; except that the treatment and license requirements shall not apply to the feeding or the permitting of the feeding to swine of garbage only because the garbage consists of any of the following: Processed products; rendered products; bakery waste; candy waste; eggs; domestic dairy products (including milk); fish from the Atlantic Ocean within 200 miles of the continental United States or Canada; or fish from inland waters of the United States or Canada which do not flow into the Pacific Ocean.
( b ) No person operating such a facility may be licensed to treat garbage unless he or she meets the requirements of this part designed to prevent the introduction or dissemination of any infectious or communicable disease of animals and unless the facility is so constructed that swine are unable to have access to untreated garbage or equipment and material coming in contact with untreated garbage.
( c ) The regulations of this part shall not be construed to repeal or supersede State laws that prohibit feeding of garbage to swine or to prohibit any State from enforcing requirements relating to the treatment of garbage that is to be fed to swine or the feeding thereof which are more stringent than the requirements contained in this part. In a State which prohibits the feeding of garbage to swine, a license under the Act will not be issued to any applicant.
[47 FR 49945, Nov. 3, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 14497, Apr. 12, 1984; 52 FR 4890, Feb. 18, 1987; 66 FR 21064, Apr. 27, 2001; 74 FR 15218, Apr. 3, 2009]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


EXHIBIT 99.2  REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP,
              ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE


To the board of directors of Clarus Corporation and Subsidiaries


     We have audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
the financial statements as of December 31, 1999 and for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1999 of Clarus Corporation and subsidiaries included in
this Form 10-K and have issued our report thereon dated January 28, 2000. Our
audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those statements taken
as a whole. The schedule listed in Item 14(a) is the responsibility of the
company's management and is presented for purposes of complying with the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic
financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our
opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to
be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

/s/  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
January 28, 2000

                                      69
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1257 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

  1st Session

                                S. 1257

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        August 2, 1999.

    Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 1257) entitled ``An Act to amend 
statutory damages provisions of title 17, United States Code'', do pass with the 
following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Copyright Damages Improvement Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. STATUTORY DAMAGES ENHANCEMENT.

    Section 504(c) of title 17, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``$500'' and inserting ``$750''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``$20,000'' and inserting 
                ``$30,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``$100,000'' and 
        inserting ``$150,000''.

SEC. 3. SENTENCING COMMISSION GUIDELINES.

    Section 2(g) of the No Electronic Theft (NET) Act (28 U.S.C. 994 
note) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
    ``(2) In implementing paragraph (1), the Sentencing Commission 
shall amend the guideline applicable to criminal infringement of a 
copyright or trademark to provide an enhancement based upon the retail 
price of the legitimate items that are infringed upon and the quantity 
of the infringing items. To the extent the conduct involves a violation 
of section 2319A of title 18, United States Code, the enhancement shall 
be based upon the retail price of the infringing items and the quantity 
of the infringing items.
    ``(3) Paragraph (1) shall be implemented not later than 3 months 
after the later of--
            ``(A) the first day occurring after May 20, 1999; or
            ``(B) the first day after the date of the enactment of this 
        paragraph,
on which sufficient members of the Sentencing Commission have been 
confirmed to constitute a quorum.
    ``(4) The Commission shall promulgate the guidelines or amendments 
provided for under this section in accordance with the procedures set 
forth in section 21(a) of the Sentencing Act of 1987, as though the 
authority under that Act had not expired.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to any action brought 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, regardless of the 
date on which the alleged activity that is the basis of the action 
occurred.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Gerald Robert Ronan, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-360;

Second District

January 6, 1975.

Ralph Ruebner and Adam Lutynski, both of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Elgin, for appellant.

Geny L. Dondanville, State’s Attorney of Geneva (Clarence Wittenstrom, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE T. MORAN.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(Nos. 333-74704, 333-84548 and 333-82350) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69318, 333-71504, 333-76042,333-82348, 333-112345 and 333-130616) of Regent Communications, Inc. of our report dated March15, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule asof December 31, 2004 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004,which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCincinnati, Ohio
CALPUFF Modeling Files for AECC Bailey, AECC McClellan, Domtar, AEP Flint Creek, Entergy Lake Catherine and Entergy White Bluff.

E ach subject

- to

- BART facility hired a consultant to prepare a five

- factor analysis for the facility

. A copy of these BART analyses , including summaries of the visibility modeling performed can be found in the docket for our proposed rulemaking.

Due to the file size of the CALPUFF modeling files, they are not available from the electronic docket. These files are available upon request. Please email your request to: Michael Feldman ( feldman.michael@epa.gov ) or call 214

- 665

- 7200

Thank you
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# DATE AND TIME:

Friday, March 11, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EST.

# PLACE:

624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

## Meeting Agenda

This meeting is open to the public.

### Portions of This Meeting May Be Held in Closed Session

I. Approval of Agenda.

II. White House Nominees for Chair, Vice Chair and Staff Director.

III. Management and Operations:
      - Staff Director's report.

IV. Program Planning: Update and discussion of projects.
      - Consideration of new statutory report topic for FY 2011.
      - Consideration of briefing/hearing topic(s) for FY 2011.
      - Title IX—Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts College Admissions.
      - English Only in the Workplace Report.
      - Healthcare Disparities Report.

V. State Advisory Committee Issues:
      - Re-chartering the North Dakota SAC.
      - Re-chartering the Montana SAC.

VI. Approval of Feb. 11, 2011 Meeting Minutes.

                    VII. Announcements.                          ( print page 11756)    

VIII. Adjourn.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

                        Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.                         *TDD:*                         (202) 376-8116.                    

                        Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105.                         *TDD:*                         (202) 376-8116.                    

Dated: March 1, 2011.

Kimberly Tolhurst,

Senior Attorney-Advisor.

[FR Doc. 2011-4919 Filed 3-1-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
#### § 117.2 Animal facilities.

Animal facilities shall comply with the requirements provided in part 108 of this chapter.
# C_2012138EN.01002401.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/24

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — da Silva Tenreiro v Commission

(Case F-72/10) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations - Article 29(1)(a) and (b) of the Staff Regulations - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Statement of reasons)

(2012/C 138/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: da Silva Tenreiro (Kraiinem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and P. Pecho, Agents)

Re:

(1) Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s candidature for the post of Director of Directorate E ‘Justice’ of the DG ‘Justice, Freedom and Security’ and the decision appointing the new Director; (2) Application for annulment of the decision to terminate the procedure for filling the post of Director of DG JLS.F ‘Security’ and the decision to appoint the new Director.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 317, 20.11.2010, p. 49.

---
#### § 327.19 Specimens for laboratory examination and similar purposes.

The provisions in this part do not apply to specimens of products for laboratory examination, research, or similar purposes when authorized importation by the Administrator under conditions specified by him in specific cases, including requirements of denaturing or other identification to deter their use for human food. Authorization will not be given for the importation of any products contrary to the provisions of part 94 of this chapter.
**Exhibit 21**     The following is a list of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company as of December31, 2005. All of the subsidiaries are wholly owned, and are included in the Consolidated FinancialStatements, which are a part of this report.   Subsidiary State of Organization Regent Broadcasting Management, LLC DelawareRegent Broadcasting, LLC DelawareRegent Broadcasting Midwest, LLC DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Mansfield, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Mansfield, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Albany, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Flint, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Duluth, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Evansville/Owensboro, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of El Paso, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Erie, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Erie, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Lafayette, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Lancaster, Inc. DelawareLivingston County Broadcasters, Inc. IllinoisRegent Broadcasting of Lexington, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Lexington, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Peoria, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of San Diego, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of San Diego, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of St. Cloud, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of St. Cloud, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of St. Cloud II, Inc. MinnesotaRepCom, Inc. MinnesotaSartell FM, Inc. MinnesotaRegent Broadcasting of South Carolina, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of South Carolina, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Utica/Rome, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Utica/Rome, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Watertown, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Watertown, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting West Coast, LLC CaliforniaRegent Broadcasting of Chico, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Chico, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Flagstaff, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Flagstaff, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Ft. Collins, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Grand Rapids, Inc. Delaware
 

 
   Subsidiary State of Organization Regent Broadcasting of Kingman, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Kingman, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Lake Tahoe, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Lake Tahoe, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Palmdale, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Palmdale, Inc. DelawareRegent Broadcasting of Redding, Inc. DelawareRegent Licensee of Redding, Inc. Delaware
### §604. Accounts of foreign branches; profit and loss

Every national banking association operating foreign branches shall conduct the accounts of each foreign branch independently of the accounts of other foreign branches established by it and of its home office, and shall at the end of each fiscal period transfer to its general ledger the profit or loss accrued at each branch as a separate item.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §25 (par.), 38 Stat. 273; Sept. 7, 1916, ch. 461, 39 Stat. 756.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the sixth undesignated par. of section 25 of act Dec. 23, 1913, which comprises this subchapter. For classification of other pars. of section 25 of this Act, see Codification note under section 601 of this title.

The words "national banking association operating foreign branches" were in the original "such banking association".

#### Amendments

1916—Act Sept. 7, 1916, substituted "accrued" for "accruing".
# C_2012138EN.01002901.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/29

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — AD v Commission

(Case F-46/10) (1)

(No need to adjudicate)

(2012/C 138/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: AD (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to grant the applicant the household allowance on the ground that the applicant and his partner have access to legal marriage in a Member State

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11/09/2010, p. 41.

---