Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A

- CR

- 435 | October 2, 2019 Page 1 of 3



### MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.



### A TTORNEY FOR 

### A PPELLANT Darren Bedwell Marion County Public Defender Indianapolis, Indiana 

### A TTORNEY S FOR 

### A PPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana J.T. Whitehead Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana



### I N T H E 

# COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Antwain Coburn , Appellant

- Defendant,

v. 

### State of Indiana , Appellee

- Plaintiff October 2, 2019 Court of Appeals Ca se No. 19A

- CR

- 435 Appeal from the Marion Superior Court The Honorable Jennifer P. Harrison, Judge Trial Court Cause No. 49G20

- 1306

- FB

- 38641



### Baker , Judge
.Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A

- CR

- 435 | October 2, 2019 Page 2 of 3

[1] 

### On January 15, 2014, Antwain Coburn pleaded guilty to Class B felony dealing in cocaine and two counts of Class D felony resisting law enforcement

. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the trial court sentenced Coburn as follows: ten years for dealing in cocaine with two years suspended to Community Corrections; and three years each, executed, on the two Class D felony convictions, to be served concurr ently with each other and with the dealing in cocaine conviction.

[2] 

### On May 19, 2018, having fully served his sentences for the Class D felony conviction s and the executed portion of the dealing in cocaine conviction, Coburn was released for two years of Comm unity Corrections. Over the course of September, October, and December 2018, Community Corrections filed notices that Coburn had violated the terms of Community Corrections on four occasions.

[3] 

### On January 24, 2019, the trial court held a hearing on the noti ces of violation and found that Coburn had, indeed, violated the terms of Community Corrections. As a result, the trial court revoked the Community Corrections placement and ordered Coburn to serve the remaining two years of the dealing in cocaine convict ion in the Department of Correction

. The abstract of judgment also ordered that two

- year sentences for the Class D felony convictions b e served concurrently with the two

- year dealing sentence. Coburn appeals the portion of the trial court’s order imposin g the Class D felony sentences a second time.Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A

- CR

- 435 | October 2, 2019 Page 3 of 3

[4] 

### The State concedes that the trial court’s order was erroneous, given that Coburn had already served the sentences for his Class D felony convictions. We agree , as those sentences were fully served with no time suspended

. It is axiomatic that o nce a sentence has been completely served, a trial court may not reinstate that sentence and order it to be served a second time.

[5] 

### The judgment of the trial court is remanded with instructions to amend the abstract of judg ment to remove the references to the Class D felony sentences.

Kirsch, J., and Crone, J., concur

.