alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph T. Fiorino, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 294]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 23, 2005, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was unable to file a valid original claim.

As the result of a back injury, claimant stopped working for the employer on December 3, 2003 and began receiving workers’ compensation benefits. He subsequently filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits effective September 19, 2005. An Administrative Law Judge ruled that he was unable to file a valid original claim under Labor Law § 527 because he did not have sufficient earnings in his extended base period. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed the decision and this appeal ensued.

Initially, we note that claimant’s base period covered the period from April 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005 and his alternate base period covered the period from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005 *(see*Labor Law § 520 [1], [2]). However, because he did not earn $1,600 during any one quarter of these base periods, he was unable to file a valid original claim *(see*Labor Law § 527 [1], [2]). Nevertheless, by virtue of his disability and receipt of workers’ compensation benefits, claimant was entitled to take advantage of the extended base period provided by Labor Law § 527 (3), which covered the period from October 1, 2003 through March 31, 2005. During the extended base period, the most that claimant earned during any quarter was $8,619.24, which he received during the fourth quarter of 2003. *893This was more than the $1,600 he needed to earn during anyone quarter under Labor Law § 527 (1). In order to qualify to file a valid original claim, however, he also was required to receive total remuneration during the extended base period equivalent to at least IV2 times the amount received during the highest calendar quarter *(see*Labor Law § 527 [1] [d]). Claimant received wages totaling $12,523.64 during the extended base period. This was less than $12,928.86, which is the equivalent of IV2 times the $8,619.24 that he earned during the highest calendar quarter. Given claimant’s failure to meet all the requirements of Labor Law § 527 (1), the Board properly found that he was unable to file a valid original claim *(see e.g. Matter of Wojnar [Commissioner of Labor],*5 AD3d 899 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
### §5326. Reports

#### (a) In general

Subject to subsection (b), the Council, acting through the Office of Financial Research, may require a bank holding company with total consolidated assets of $250,000,000,000 or greater or a nonbank financial company supervised by the Board of Governors, and any subsidiary thereof, to submit certified reports to keep the Council informed as to—

(1) the financial condition of the company;

(2) systems for monitoring and controlling financial, operating, and other risks;

(3) transactions with any subsidiary that is a depository institution; and

(4) the extent to which the activities and operations of the company and any subsidiary thereof, could, under adverse circumstances, have the potential to disrupt financial markets or affect the overall financial stability of the United States.

#### (b) Use of existing reports

#### (1) In general

For purposes of compliance with subsection (a), the Council, acting through the Office of Financial Research, shall, to the fullest extent possible, use—

(A) reports that a bank holding company, nonbank financial company supervised by the Board of Governors, or any functionally regulated subsidiary of such company has been required to provide to other Federal or State regulatory agencies or to a relevant foreign supervisory authority;

(B) information that is otherwise required to be reported publicly; and

(C) externally audited financial statements.

#### (2) Availability

Each bank holding company described in subsection (a) and nonbank financial company supervised by the Board of Governors, and any subsidiary thereof, shall provide to the Council, at the request of the Council, copies of all reports referred to in paragraph (1).

#### (3) Confidentiality

The Council shall maintain the confidentiality of the reports obtained under subsection (a) and paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title I, §116, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1406; Pub. L. 115–174, title IV, §401(c)(1)(B), May 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 1358.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–174 substituted "$250,000,000,000" for "$50,000,000,000" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Except as otherwise provided, amendment by Pub. L. 115–174 effective 18 months after May 24, 2018, see section 401(d) of Pub. L. 115–174, set out as a note under section 5365 of this title.

#### Construction of 2018 Amendment

For construction of amendment by Pub. L. 115–174 as applied to certain foreign banking organizations, see section 401(g) of Pub. L. 115–174, set out as a note under section 5365 of this title.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 2, 2021 No. 04
- 21
- 00042
- CV CITY OF FLORESVILLE, TEXAS , and Marissa Ximenez, Gloria E. Martinez, Juan Ortiz, Jade Jimenez, Gloria Morales Cantu, Monica Veliz, in their official cap acities, Appellants
v. Nick NISSEN , David Johns, Paul W. Sack,

Appellees From the 81st Judicial District Court , Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVW
- 19
- 00897 Honorable Lynn Ellison , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellees’ brief was due on August 9, 2021. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.6(b). To date, no Appellees’ brief or motion for extension of time has been filed. If Appellees wish to file a brief in this appeal, Appellees are hereby ORDERED to file within TEN DAYS of the date of this order (1) Appellees’ brief and (2) a reasonable explanation for failing to t imely file the brief. See id. R. 38.6(d). If Appellees wish the response to serve as a motion for extension of time, the response must comply with Rule 10.5(b)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Fourth Court of Appeals’ local rules. Se e id. R. 10.5(b)(1); 4 TH T EX . A PP . (S AN A NTONIO ) L OC . R S . , http://www.txcourts.gov/4thcoa/practice

- before

- the

- court/ local

- rules.aspx
. If Appellees fail to file an adequate response within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, the appeal will be set for sub mission without Appellees’ brief. See Jackson v. Tex. Bd. of Pardons & Paroles , No. 01
- 03
- 00862
- CV, 2008 WL 921035, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 3, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.) ( “ ‘ In a civil case, the court will accep t as true the facts stat ed [in A ppellant ’ s brief] unless another party contradicts them. ’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.1(g))).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of September, 2021
.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
§ 354.38 Suspension of plant approval. ( a ) Any plant approval given pursuant to the regulations in this part may be suspended by the Administrator for: ( 1 ) Failure to maintain plant and equipment in a satisfactory state of repair;
( 2 ) The use of operating procedures which are not in accordance with the regulations in this part; or
( 3 ) Alterations of buildings, facilities, or equipment which cannot be approved in accordance with the regulations in this part.
( b ) During such period of suspension, inspection service shall not be rendered. However, the other provisions of the regulations pertaining to providing service on a resident basis will remain in effect unless such service is terminated in accordance with the provisions of this part. If the plant facilities or methods of operation are not brought into compliance within a reasonable period of time, to be specified by the Administrator, the service shall be terminated. Upon termination of inspection service in an official plant pursuant to the regulations in this part, the plant approval shall also become terminated, and all labels, seals, tags or packaging material bearing official identification shall, under the supervision of a person designated by the Service, either be destroyed, or the official identification completely obliterated, or sealed in a manner acceptable to the Service.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 334 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 133
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 334

                          [Report No. 106-396]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 71) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 1999

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 71) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 71) making further continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 133

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 334

                          [Report No. 106-396]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 71) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 18, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
# C_2015034EN.01002501.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Lucchini v Commission

(Case T-91/10) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils - Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Fixing of prices and payment terms - Limiting or controlling output or sales - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Legal basis - Rights of the defence - Fines - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Extenuating circumstances - Taking account of an annulment judgment in a related case))

(2015/C 034/28)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lucchini SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented initially by M. Delfino, J.-P. Gunther, E. Bigi, C. Breuvart and L. De Sanctis, and subsequently by J.-P Gunther, E. Bigi, C. Breuvart and D. Galli, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by R. Sauer and B. Gencarelli, acting as Agents, assisted by M. Moretto, lawyer, and subsequently by M. Sauer and R. Striani, acting as Agents, assisted by M. Moretto)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for a declaration of the non-existence or for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 7492 final of 30 September 2009 (Case COMP/37.956 — Reinforcing bars, readoption), as amended by Commission Decision C(2009) 9912 final of 8 December 2009, in the alternative application for annulment of Article 2 of that decision, and in the further alternative application for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Lucchini SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lucchini SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
#### § 315.3 Disposal of products passed for cooking if not handled according to this part.

Products passed for cooking if not handled and processed in accordance with the provisions of this part, shall be disposed of in accordance with § 314.1 or § 314.3 of this subchapter.

[35 FR 15577, Oct. 3, 1970. Redesignated at 37 FR 2661, Feb. 4, 1972]
Exhibit 11.0 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

     For the Nine Months and Three Months Ended December 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED)

Statement regarding computation of earnings per share for the nine months ended
December 31, 2000.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Income       Weighted Average Shares     Per-Share Amount
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>                      <C>                   <C>
Basic Earnings per Share
   Income available to
   Common stockholders               $   22,315               87,811                $     0.25

Effect of Dilutive Securities
   Unearned incentive plan shares                              3,036
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------
Diluted Earnings Per Share
   Income available to
   common stockholders
   and assumed conversions           $   22,315               90,847                $     0.25
                                    =============================================================
</TABLE>


Statement regarding computation of earnings per share for the three months ended
December 31, 2000.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Income       Weighted Average Shares     Per-Share Amount
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>                      <C>                   <C>
Basic Earnings per Share
   Income available to
   Common stockholders               $    4,705               88,064                $     0.05

Effect of Dilutive Securities
   Unearned incentive plan shares                              2,838
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------
Diluted Earnings Per Share
   Income available to
   common stockholders
   and assumed conversions           $    4,705               90,902                $     0.05
                                    =============================================================
</TABLE>


                                       13
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1165

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on

the amount of receipts attributable to military property which may be

treated as exempt foreign trade income.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. MACK (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BREAUX, Mr.

GRAMM, Mr. ROBB, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. BRYAN, Mr.

TORRICELLI, Mr. WARNER, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. KYL, Mr.

HELMS, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. LUGAR, and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the limitation on the amount of receipts attributable

to military property which may be treated as exempt

foreign trade income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Jobs and

5 Trade Promotion Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 1165 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON RECEIPTS ATTRIB2 UTABLE TO MILITARY PROPERTY WHICH MAY

3 BE TREATED AS EXEMPT FOREIGN TRADE IN4 COME.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 923 of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining exempt for7 eign trade income) is amended by striking paragraph (5)

8 and by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (5).

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

11 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
null

473.8025
-  Home 
-  Training 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Outreach & Engagement 
                      -  Training Requirements for Industry 
                      -  Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG) 
                      -  Workshops 
                      -  Webinars 
                      -  Community Liaisons (CLs) 
                      -  Publications 
                      -  Publicaciones (en español) 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  Training Modules 
                      -  Videos and Mobile Apps 
                      -  Contact Us 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Order Training Materials From The PHMSA Portal                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          DOT Chart 17: Markings, Labeling, and Placarding Guide                   

## Contact Us

Hazardous Materials Training Program
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**Training@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4900****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922****Fax:**202-366-7342**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Hazardous Materials Outreach & Engagement

## 

## About the Outreach and Engagement Program

The Outreach and Engagement Branch is responsible for enhancing regulatory compliance through development and dissemination of written materials that enable the public to more easily understand and comply with the Hazardous Materials Regulation (HMR), and producing outreach materials designed to help the regulated community meet HMR training requirements. The Branch also develops and publishes the *Emergency Response Guidebook* (ERG) and other emergency preparedness and response instructional materials.
§ 100.36 Signature, electronic signature. ( a ) A *signature* is an individual's name or mark on a writing or record that identifies the individual and authenticates the writing or record. A *signature* includes an *electronic signature,* unless otherwise specified.
( b ) An *electronic signature* is an electronic word, image, symbol, or process that an individual attaches to or associates with a writing or record to identify the individual and authenticate the writing or record. Examples of electronic signatures include a digital image of a handwritten signature, or a secure, digital code attached to an electronically transmitted message that uniquely identifies and authenticates the sender.
( c ) A writing or record may be sworn, made under oath, or otherwise certified or verified under penalty of perjury, by electronic signature. A writing or record may be notarized electronically pursuant to applicable State law.
[89 FR 214, Jan. 2, 2024]
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1261

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel YANKEE.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22, 1999

Mr. DODD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

YANKEE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

7 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United

8 States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue
2

•S 1261 IS

1 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse2 ment for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

3 YANKEE, United States official number 1076210.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            2048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      240
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                       2080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5015
<PP&E>                                            4561
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7188
<OTHER-SE>                                       (365)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9079
<SALES>                                          17219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17219
<CGS>                                             9752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  8132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (150)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (482)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
#### § 3.57 Employees.

A sufficient number of employees shall be utilized to maintain the prescribed level of husbandry practices set forth in this subpart. Such practices shall be under the supervision of an animal caretaker who has a background in animal husbandry or care.