alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1701z–10. Model rehabilitation guidelines in inspection and approval of rehabilitated properties; report to Congress

(a)(1) The Secretary shall develop model rehabilitation guidelines for the voluntary adoption by States and communities to be used in conjunction with existing building codes by State and local officials in the inspection and approval of rehabilitated properties.

(2) Such guidelines shall be developed in consultation with the National Institute of Building Sciences, appropriate national organizations of agencies and officials of State and local governments, representatives of the building industry, and consumer groups, and other interested parties.

(3) The Secretary shall publish such guidelines for public comment not later than one year after October 31, 1978, and promulgate them no later than eighteen months after such date.

(4) The Secretary may furnish technical assistance to State and local governments to facilitate the use and implementation of such guidelines.

(b) The Secretary shall report to Congress not later than thirty-six months after October 31, 1978, regarding (1) actions taken by State and local governments to adopt guidelines or their equivalents, and (2) recommendations for further action.

(Pub. L. 91–609, title V, §511, as added Pub. L. 95–557, title IX, §903, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2125.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970, and not as part of the National Housing Act which comprises this chapter.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

Secretary Vilsack Issues Proclamation Recognizing National 

Cooperative Month

WASHINGTON, Oct. 3, 2023 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom 

Vilsack today issued a USDA proclamation recognizing October 2023 as National Cooperative 

Month to celebrate the vital role cooperatives play in improving economic opportunities and 

advancing equity in America.

This year’s National Cooperative Month theme is “Owning Our Identity,” echoing the BidenHarris Administration’s efforts to create more and better markets, address climate change and 

advance equity.

In his proclamation, Vilsack noted that more than 30,000 cooperatives account for more than 2.0

million American jobs and generate more than $700 billion in annual revenue. Agricultural 

cooperatives are in every state serving people in 10,000 locations.

USDA Rural Development continues to partner with cooperatives as they serve their members’ 

needs, fill market gaps and create opportunities for people through this long-standing, resilient 

and sustainable business model. Rural cooperatives are the backbone for America’s power 

delivery and for improving access to high-speed internet, affordable housing, education services

and high-quality health care services for people in rural communities.

The agency offers a variety of financial assistance and services to assist rural businesses, 

including cooperatives and agricultural producers. To learn more, visit 

https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/cooperatives.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery 

subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Written
Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of
the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 filed on the
date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ johann dreyer
### §2811. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–242, title V, §565(b), Feb. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1945

Section, Pub. L. 94–200, title III, §312, as added Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §340(c), Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1659; amended Pub. L. 99–120, §5(c), Oct. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 504; Pub. L. 99–156, §5(c), Nov. 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 817; Pub. L. 99–219, §5(c), Dec. 26, 1985, 99 Stat. 1732; Pub. L. 99–267, §5(c), Mar. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 99–272, title III, §3011(c), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 106; Pub. L. 99–289, §1(b), May 2, 1986, 100 Stat. 412; Pub. L. 99–345, §1, June 24, 1986, 100 Stat. 673; Pub. L. 99–430, Sept. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 986; Pub. L. 100–122, §1, Sept. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 793; Pub. L. 100–154, Nov. 5, 1987, 101 Stat. 890; Pub. L. 100–170, Nov. 17, 1987, 101 Stat. 914; Pub. L. 100–179, Dec. 3, 1987, 101 Stat. 1018; Pub. L. 100–200, Dec. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 1327, provided that authority granted by this chapter was to expire on Mar. 15, 1988.
#### § 145.31 Definitions.

Except where the context otherwise requires, for the purposes of this subpart the following terms shall be construed, respectively, to mean:

*Chicks.* Newly hatched chickens.

*Meat type chicken breeding flocks.* Flocks that are composed of stock that has been developed for meat production and are maintained for the principal purpose of producing chicks for the ultimate production of meat.

*Started chickens.* Young chickens (chicks, pullets, cockerels, capons) which have been fed and watered and are less than 6 months of age.

[36 FR 23112, Dec. 3, 1971, as amended at 41 FR 48724, Nov. 5, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 61586, Oct. 26, 1979, and amended at 59 FR 12799, Mar. 18, 1994; 65 FR 8018, Feb. 17, 2000]
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Timothy T. Tevens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act oF
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 13, 2003


                                                /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                                -------------------------
                                                Timothy T. Tevens,
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine month
period ending April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Herndon, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/ Carl Herndon
     ----------------
     Carl Herndon
     Principal Executive Officer
     June 8, 2005
§ 115.112 Contracting with non-DHS entities for the confinement of detainees. ( a ) An agency that contracts for the confinement of detainees in holding facilities operated by non-DHS private or public agencies or other entities, including other government agencies, shall include in any new contracts, contract renewals, or substantive contract modifications the entity's obligation to adopt and comply with these standards.
( b ) Any new contracts, contract renewals, or substantive contract modifications shall provide for agency contract monitoring to ensure that the contractor is complying with these standards.
( c ) To the extent an agency contracts for confinement of holding facility detainees, all rules in this subpart that apply to the agency shall apply to the contractor, and all rules that apply to staff or employees shall apply to contractor staff.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TOYOTA MOTOR
CREDIT CORPORATION'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             177
<SECURITIES>                                       305
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,922<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       213
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                         14,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           915
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,830
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,450
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,708<F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   136
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    283
<INCOME-TAX>                                       121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include Investments in Operating Leases net of Accumulated
Depreciation and Finance Receivables net of Unearned Income.
<F2>Toyota Motor Credit Corporation's Balance Sheet is not classified into
Current and Long-Term Assets and Liabilities.
<F3>Total Costs includes Interest Expense and Depreciation on Operating Leases.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007096EN.01003301.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/33

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 April 2007 — House of Donuts International v OHIM — Panrico (House of Donuts)

(Joined Cases T-333/04 and T-334/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Applications for Community figurative marks ‘House of donuts’ - Earlier national word marks ‘DONUT ’and earlier figurative marks ‘donuts’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion)

(2007/C 96/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: House of Donuts International (George Town, Grand Cayman) (represented by: N. Decker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen and A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Panrico, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Two actions brought against the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 May 2004 (Cases R 1034/2001-4 and R 1036/2001-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Panrico, SA and House of Donuts International

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and of the intervener. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and of the intervener.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 4.12.2004.

1

---
~ PBGC Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

1200 K Street. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005*4026 

John H. Moore, FSA, MAAA, EA, FCA 

Chair. Pension Committee 

American Academy o f Actuaries 

1850 M Street, NW, Suite 300 

Washington, DC 20036 

RE: Reporting of PBGC Premium Payment on Form 5500, Schedule H 

Dear Mr. Moore: 

This is in response to your lener dated October 14, 20 11, regarding the instructions on the 

Schedule H (Fonn 5500 Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plans) for reporting of 

premium payments made to the Pension Benefi t Guaranty Corporation (pBGC) from plan assets. 

Specifically, the 2009 and 2010 instructions for Schedule H provided that filers should report 

infomlation on premi um payments from plan assets on Line 21 as an asset transfe r. Prior to 

2009, such infonnation was reported on Line 2i(4) under "Other Expenses." You indicate that it 

is your understanding that for plan years 2009 and 20 I 0, some fi lers have been reporting the 

amount on line 2i(4) as was penni ned for 2008 and earlier and some on line 21. For the 2009 and 

20 10 plan years, you the refore recommend thal filers be pennitted to report premium payments 

made to the PBGe from plan assets on either Line 2i(4) or Line 21 of the Schedule 1-1 . 

For the 2009 and 2010 plan years, filers may report infonnation on premium payments from plan 

assets on either Line 2i(4) or Line 21 of the Schedule H. The 2011 instructions for Schedule H 

will require reporting ofinfonnation on premium payments from plan assets on Line 2i(4). 

I hope this leuer, which was prepared in coordination with the Department of Labor and the 

Internal Revenue Service, is he lpful. PBGe will post this response on its website. Jfyou have 

any furthe r questions, please contact me at (202) 326A223 ext. 3865. 

Sincerely, 

~,-,-W~

November 2, 20 11 

Grace H. Kraemer 

Anomey, Legislative and Regul atory Department 

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

cc: 

Elizabeth Goodman, Senior Employee Benefits Law Specialist, Employee Benefit Security 

Administration, U.S. Department of Labor 

Ann E. Junkins, Management and Program Ana lyst, Internal Revenue Service
### §5015. Study and report on funds availability

#### (a) Study

In order to evaluate the implementation and the impact of this chapter, the Board shall conduct a study of—

(1) the percentage of total checks cleared in which the paper check is not returned to the paying bank;

(2) the extent to which banks make funds available to consumers for local and nonlocal checks prior to the expiration of maximum hold periods;

(3) the length of time within which depositary banks learn of the nonpayment of local and nonlocal checks;

(4) the increase or decrease in check-related losses over the study period; and

(5) the appropriateness of the time periods and amount limits applicable under sections 4002 and 4003 of this title, as in effect on October 28, 2003.

#### (b) Report to Congress

Before the end of the 30-month period beginning on the effective date of this chapter, the Board shall submit a report to the Congress containing the results of the study conducted under this section, together with recommendations for legislative action.

(Pub. L. 108–100, §16, Oct. 28, 2003, 117 Stat. 1190.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 108–100, Oct. 28, 2003, 117 Stat. 1177, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5001 of this title and Tables.

The effective date of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), is at the end of the 12-month period beginning on Oct. 28, 2003, except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, see section 20 of Pub. L. 108–100, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5001 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective at the end of the 12-month period beginning on Oct. 28, 2003, see section 20 of Pub. L. 108–100, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5272]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Transfer of Commercial First-Class Mail Parcels to Competitive 
Product List

AGENCY: Postal Service.\TM\

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service hereby provides notice that it has filed a 
request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to transfer commercial 
First-Class Mail Parcels from the Mail Classification Schedule's 
Market-Dominant Product List to its Competitive Product List.

DATES: March 9, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nabeel Cheema, 202-268-7178.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 24, 2011, the United States 
Postal Service[supreg] filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to transfer commercial 
First-Class Mail Parcels from the Mail Classification Schedule's 
Market-Dominant Product List to its Competitive Product List, pursuant 
to 39 U.S.C. 3642. The transfer would take place in two steps: First, 
commercial First-Class Mail Parcels would be removed from the market-
dominant product list; then, a new product, provisionally titled 
Lightweight Commercial Parcels, would be added to the competitive 
product list. Lightweight Commercial Parcels would be identical to 
commercial First-Class Mail Parcels, except that Lightweight Commercial 
Parcels would have a content restriction prohibiting the inclusion of 
any item classified as a ``letter'' under the Private Express Statutes. 
Documents pertinent to this request are available at http://www.prc.gov, Docket No. MC2011-22.

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2011-5272 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2007082EN.01003301.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/33

---

Judgment of the Court of 13 February 2007 — Mundipharma v OHIM-Altana Pharma (RESPICUR)

(Case T-256/04 P) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark RESPICUR - Earlier national word mark RESPICORT - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Proof of use of the earlier mark - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94)

(2007/C 82/72)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mundipharma AG (Basle, Switzerland) (represented by F. Nielsen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by B. Müller and subsequently by G. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant:

Other the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Altana Pharma AG (Konstanz, Germany) (H. Becker, lawyer)

Other the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action for annulment against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 April 2004 (Case R 1004/2002-2) relating to opposition proceedings involving Munidpharma AG and Altana Pharma AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 April 2004 (Case R 1004/2002-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 April 2004 (Case R 1004/2002-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, except for those relating to the intervention; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, except for those relating to the intervention;

| 3. | Orders the applicant to bear its costs relating to the intervention; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the applicant to bear its costs relating to the intervention;

| 4. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 28.8.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 10.1


 


HRPT PROPERTIES
TRUST


 


Summary
of Trustee Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently
effective compensation of the trustees of HRPT Properties Trust (the “Company”)
for services as trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the
Board of Trustees.


 


·                  Each independent trustee receives an
annual fee of $25,000, plus a fee of $500 for each meeting attended.  Up to two $500 fees are payable if a board
meeting and one or more board committee meetings are held on the same date.


 


·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee,
the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of
whom is an independent trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $7,500,
$3,500 and $3,500, respectively.


 


·                  Each trustee is entitled to receive a
grant of 4,000 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the
date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders
(or, for trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day
of the first board meeting attended).


 


·                  The Company generally reimburses all
trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as
trustees.