Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 1 of 20 Facility Questionnaire for Primary Aluminum Reductio n Plants 1

, 2

Please provide the information requested in the following forms. Use additional copies of the survey forms for additional facilities, as needed, for your response.

This request for informa tion is divided into four parts to be completed by each facility:

Part A General Facility Information

Part B Process and Emissions Control Devices

Part C Start

- ups and Shutdowns

Part D Previously Performed Testing and Test Report Data

Note, as stated in the cover letter from EPA, the survey response(s) ( Enclosure 1 ) and the new test results ( Enclosure 2 ) are due by May 31, 2011

.

Please separate confidential business information (CBI) from non

- CBI for submittal to EPA.

Please see the instructions in the cover letter for submitting CBI.

1 See Appendix A for an explanation of acronyms used in this document and Appendix B for a list of Hazardous Air

Pollutants (HAP).

2 Please make copies and complete these forms for each facility in your company subject to this request for

information, as d escribed in the cover letter from EPA. If possible we would prefer receiving the completed forms

as electronic files in Microsoft® Word format . Please add additional rows to the tables as needed to contain your responses. Blank electronic forms are include d on the disc provided with this package.Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 2 of 20 PART A : GENERAL FACILITY INFORMA TION (Please fill out a separate form for each of your facilities )

1

. Name and address of the PARENT COMPANY that owns the facility:

Alumax of South Carolina, Inc

P.O. Box 1000

Goos e Creek, S.C. 29445

2. Name and address of legal OPERATOR of the facility, if different than the legal OWNER:

Alumax of South Carolina, Inc

P.O. Box 1000 Goose Creek, S.C. 29445

3. Complete street address of facility (physical location):

a. Address: 3575 Highway 52

b. City: Goose Creek

c. State: S.C.

d. Zip: 29445

e. County: Berkeley

4. Provide mailing address of the facility if different than physical location:

a. Address: P.O. Box 1000

b. City: Goose Creek

c. State: S.C.

d. Zip: 29445

5. Facility cont act able to answer technical questions about the completed survey:

a. Name (First Name, Last Name): Henk J. van der Meyden

b. Title: Environmental Manager

c. Telephone number: 843

- 572

- 5361

d. Fax number: 843

- 572

- 5378

e. E

- mail: Henk.vanderMeyden@alcoa.com

6

. Please provide an electronic copy of your current Title V operating permit and any pending

Title V operating permit modification applications (pdf file s are preferred).

Included on CD provided

7. Please provide a copy of the facility schematic showing all of the p rimary a luminum operations that are subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LL . Please i nclud e the control

device ID numbers in the facility schematic. Included on CD providedEnclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 3 of 20 PART B: PROCESS ES AND EMISSIONS CONTROL DEVICES

8

. P itch storage tank s :

3 Total number of pitch storage tanks at facility

Yes Is at least one of the pitch storage tanks empty at all times?

22713 Total amount of pitch used (tons per year) assumin g facility operation at maximum capacity

8a. Please provide the c apacity (tons) of each pitch storage tank at facility (use the same pitch storage tank ID numbers as were assigned in the schematic provided in response to question 7 and add columns if necessary):

ID No.: 83016 83017 83018 (empty)

____________ Capacity : 490 490 490

____________ 8b. Please provide a rationale, if applicable, for why application of an emission standard

to the p itch storage tank(s) is not practica b l e economically or technologically

Not practicable economically: _

_______________ ___________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

Not practicable tec hnologically: __________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________ ________

9

. A node bake furnaces:

2 Total n umber of anode bake furnaces at facility

1 51,902 Facility

- wide green a node production capacity (tons per year)

106,957 Total a mount of coke used for anode production (tons per year) assuming facili ty operation at maximum capacity

1 0

. A luminum production, by potline (s) (use the same potline ID numbers as were assigned in the schematic provided in response to question 7) :

Total potlines (number) and combined aluminum capacity (tons per year):

Total po tlines ( 2 ) Aluminum capacity ( 256,150 )

Individual potlines (add rows as necessary) and aluminum capacity (tons per year) :

Potline # 1 Aluminum capacity ( 128,075 )

Potline # 2 Aluminum capacity ( 128,075 )Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 4 of 20 1 1

. Please describe your facility potline types (add r ows as necessary and use the same ID numbers as were assigned in the schematic provided in response to question 7) :

1 1 a. Potline ID No. Potline Type * Total No. of Pots

Potline # 1 CWPB1 180

Potline # 2 CWPB 1 180

* Center

- work ed pre

- bake 1 (CWPB1); Horizontal stud Soderberg 1 (HSS1)

Center

- worked pre

- bake 2 ( CWPB2 ) ; Horizontal stud Soderberg 2 (HSS2)

Center

- worked pre

- bake 3 ( CWPB3 ) ; Vertical stud Soderberg (VSS)

Side

- worked pre

- bake (SWPB)

1 1 b. What is the average frequency, average number, and average duration of cell openings (side shield and/or door removals) for each potline?

Potline

ID Cell opening (side shield and/or door removals)

Average Frequency a Average Number b Average Duration c
(minutes)

Side shield Door Side shield Door Side shield Door

1 1 4 6 6 18 8

2 1 4 6 6 18 8

a The average number of times that at least one side shield or door of a given cell of

the cited potline is open ed during a 24 consecutive hour period.

b The average number of cell openings (i.e. side shields and/or doors removed from

all the cells in the cited potline) at any given time

.

c The average length of time, in minutes, t hat a given side shield or door of a cell of

the cited potline is removed

.

1 1 c

. Describe the exhaust capture/hooding system for each potline including the capture efficiency (if known) , evacuation rate, and damper system.

Potline ID Capture * efficiency (%) Evacuation

rate (scfm) Damper system? (i.e. to a llow high and low flow evacuation rates)

Yes No

53002/ 53003 9 8.9 720,000 X

53004/ 53005 9 8.9 720,000 X

*Primary capture efficiency = hooding efficiency @ pots

1 1 d. Please provide a copy of the method(s) used (e.g. inspecti on checklist or log) to ensure that the capture efficiencies cited in the table above are achieved.Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 5 of 20 Pot flow measurements are conducted semi

- annually, and hooding inspections are performed weekly. See examples of documentation on CD provided.

1 2

. Is total fluoride emitted from the roof vents measured with a sampling manifold or a cassette system? ( CHECK one) X Manifold or ______________ Cassette

1 2 a

. What is the total typical exhaust rate from the roof vents of each pot room ( scfm )?

Room 1

- 4,093 ,956 ft3/min/room (same for room 2)

Room 3

- 4,337,734 ft3/min/room (same for room 4)

1 3

. Please describe your facility paste plant and emissions controls below :

0.63 % Typical sulfur content of pitch

0.85 Maximum sulfur content of pitch cited in specifi cations provided to pitch suppliers , if applicable

2.13 % Typical sulfur content of coke

2.22% Maximum sulfur content of coke cited in specifications provided to coke suppliers , if applicable

1 3 a. What is the availability and cost of coke and pitch with lower sulfur content s for your facility? What is the lowest sulfur content coke and pitch available?

Alcoa discussed at length the availability and cost of lower sulfur coke during a meeting with EPA on May 23, 2011. Please r efer to the presentation provided by Alcoa for that meeting.

1 3 b. What company (provide name and contact information) supplies your facility with the raw materials used in paste production? Please submit a copy of the current MSDS

for these materials.

Cok e

– Oxbow (580

- 874

- 2201)

Pitch

– Koppers (800

- 321

- 9876)

1 3 c. Is any coal tar pitch (as opposed to petroleum pitch) used in your facility? NO

13d. Please provide information on the methodology used [e.g. assumptions made, mass balance calculations, assume d variations associated with potline type (e.g. Soderberg

versus pre

- bake), etc.] to estimate COS emissions from the facility.

Mass Balance Calculations based on sulfur content of raw materials and emission factor of percent sulfur that is converted to C OS obtained from another facility

1 4

. a. Please provide information on any air pollution control device(s) controlling emissions from the pitch storage tanks, the paste plant, the anode bake furnaces, and/or the potlines at this facility using Tables 1

, 2

, 3

, 4 , and/or 5 , as appropriate. Please use the same ID numbers as were assigned in the schematic provided in response to question 7.Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 6 of 20 b. Does your operating permit include limits for emissions of particulate matter from the potlines and/ or limits on the sulfur content of the pitch and/or coke used to produce anodes? If so, what are those limits? PM Limit for Each Potroom Scrubber

– 1.5 lbs/hr PM Limit for Each Potroom Roof

– 18.15 lbs/hr Sulfur Limit Pitch

– 0.85% Sulfur Limit Coke

– 2.22%

c

. Do you have any plans to install any new higher efficiency rated control devices

, or have any pending applications to add on any new controls on sources that are part of the primary aluminum reduction facility?

( CHECK one) ___________ Yes

____ X

________ No

If “Yes,” please specify and include any copies of pending permit applications as requested in item 6 in Part A.

d

. Please indicate below all emission controls that were installed or upgraded AFTER October 7, 1997 in order to meet the MACT st andard s for primary aluminum reduction plants ( add rows as necessary and use the same ID numbers as were assigned in the schematic provided in response to question 7):

Description of new or upgraded control Emission point Emission limit Date the control or upgrade became operational

Fume collection hood

modification 50054 N/A October 1999

1 5

. Pollution prevention: Describe any procedures

, work practice standards

, or materials used at your facility to prevent or reduce emissions of HAP from pitch storag e tanks, the paste plant, the anode bake furnaces, and/or the potlines at this facility ( as opposed to controlling pollution after it is formed)

. Pitch Storage Tanks

- Two of the pitch storage tanks are vented to an empty tank. The vent

from the empty tank is equipped with a petroleum coke

- filled canister to capture POM

emissions.

Potlines

– Steps are taken to ensure proper anode cover within the pots. Proper anode

cover material over the top of the anodes reduces evolution of HF.Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 7 of 20 Table 1 Wet Scrubber Description

1

. Control d evice description and ID number ( or numbers, if several identical control devices are used to control a given emiss ion source ) :

2

. Stack or vent location of each control device (use NAD83 and include six decimal places and add rows as necessary ):

ID No.: _________ Latitude: ___

____________ Longitude: __

______________ ID No.: _________ Latitude: _______________ Long itude: ________________

ID No.: _________ Latitude: _______________ Longitude: ________________

3

. Design collection efficiency and outlet concentration (add rows as necessary) :

Pollutant Collection Outlet Source of efficiency * concentration * Estimati on * (if known) (if known)

PM Percent mg/dscf

_________ PM10 Percent mg/dscf

_________ PM2.5 Percent mg/dscf

_________ Total Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ Hydrogen Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ POM Percent mg/dscf

_________ COS Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________

* 1 = Performance testing 2 = Engineering judgment 3 = Manufacturer specs.

4 = Title V permit application 5 = Other (specify) _______________________

4

. Device type: V enturi V ertical packed bed

H orizontal packed bed T ray tower spray chamber

O ther (speci fy or describe):

5

. Pressure mode of operation: positive pressure negative pressure

6

. Typical gas temperature: inlet °F outlet °F

7

. Gas flow rate: acfm (at scrubber outle t) dscfm

8

. Pressure drop across scrubber : inches water column (in. H 2 O)Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 8 of 20 9

. Liquid to gas ratio: gal/1,000 acf

10

. Chemical usage rate (specify chemical and typical usage rate , if ap plicable )

Chemical added Usage rate Units for usage rate

11

. Identify each source served by this control device ( add rows as necessary )

.
Source ID No(s). Source description(s)

12

. Indicate what operational parameters of the control device a re monitored to ensure that the

control device is operating properly:

Volumetric flow rate Fan amperage

Pressure drop Water flow rate

Other (specify):

.

13

. What level of a monitored operati onal parameter triggers corrective action?

V olumetric flow rate (acfm) F an amperage (amps)

P ressure drop (in. H 2 O) W ate r flow rate (gpm)

O ther (specify):

.

14

. Has the collected sludge been analyzed?

_____ Yes

_____ No

If yes, provide the average and range for each HAP constitue nt analyzed over the past year or last 9 samples, whichever is fewer. Alternatively, attach the results of the analyses. Do not include results from the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).

15

. Additional comments and information:Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 9 of 20 Table 2 Co mbination Dry Alumina Scrubber/Bag House Description

1

. Control device description and ID number (or numbers, if several identical control devices are used to control a given emission source): Scrubber and Dust Collector for Alumina Reduction Pots on Potline #1(161E)

- 53002 Scrubber and Dust Collector for Alumina Reduction Pots on Potline #1(161W)

– 5300 3 Scrubber and Dust Collector for Alumina Reduction Pots on Potline #2(162E)

- 53004 Scrubber and Dust Collector for Alumina Reduction Pots on Potline #2(162W )

- 53005

2

. Stack or vent location of each control device (use NAD83 and include six decimal places and add rows as necessary):

ID No.: 02 Latitude: _ 33.051741

_______ Longitude: _

- 80.054075

______ ID No.: 03 Latitude: _ 33.051614

_______ Longitude: _

- 80 .055322

______ ID No.: 04 Latitude: _ 33.53110

________ Longitude:

_ - 80.054276

_____ ID No.: 05 Latitude: _ 33.052985

_______ Longitude: _

- 80.055521

_____

3

. Design collection efficiency and outlet concentration (add rows as necessary):

**See test report su bmitted for outlet concentrations

Pollutant Collection Outlet Source of efficiency * concentration * Estimation * (if known) (if known)

PM Percent 0.0048 mg/dscf

___ 5

______ PM10 Percent 0.0040 mg/dscf

___ 5

______ PM2. 5 Percent 0.0019 mg/dscf

___ 5

______ Total Fluorides Percent ** mg/dscf

___ 1

______ Hydrogen Fluorides Percent ** mg/dscf

___ 1

______ POM Percent mg/dscf

_________ COS Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent m g/dscf

_________ ** See reports submitted for each line

* 1 = Performance testing 2 = Engineering judgment 3 = Manufacturer specs. 4 = Title V permit application 5 = Other (specify) _______________________

4

. Scrubber device type :

_____ Fluidized bed X Inje ction

_____ Other (specify or describe): _________________________________________Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 10 of 20 5

. Bag cleaning method:

_____ Pulse jet

_____ Reverse air X Shaker

_____ Other (describe)

_________________________________________________

6

. Pressure mode of operation: positive pressure X negative pressure

7

. Typical gas temperature: inlet to scrubber 250 ° F outlet from bag house 210 ° F

8

. Gas flow rate: 366,271 acfm (at bag house outlet) 299,145 dscfm

9

. Pressure drop: Ac ross scrubber: 7.6 inches water column (in.

H 2 O)
Across bag house: 7.6 inches water column (in.

H 2 O)

10

. Solid to gas ratio: 1.05 lb/1,000 acf *Add to assumptions/calculation s sheet

11

. Alumina usage rate (differentiate between virgin and recycled alumina from potlines)

Type of Alumina Added Usage rate Units for usage rate

Virgin alumina 1 1 Tons/hr

Recycled alumina 68 Tons/hr

Other alumina (specify

________________)

12

. Ident ify each emission source served by this control device (add rows as necessary).

Source ID No(s). Description(s)

70010 Aluminum Potline #1

– Control Device 53002

70010 Aluminum Potline #1

– Control Device 53003

70010 Aluminum Potline #2

– Control Device 53004

70010 Aluminum Potline #2

– Control Device 53005

13

. Indicate what operational parameters of the control device are monitored to ensure that the control device is operating properly:

X Alumi na Feed rate X Fan amperage

Pressure drop X Visible emissions opacity

Other (specify):

.

14

. What level of a monitored operational parameter triggers corrective actio n?

< 7 Alumina Feed rate (tons/hr ) < 465 Fan amperage (amps)Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 11 of 20 Pressure drop (in. H 2 O) Visible emissions opacity (%)

Other (specify): Any VE from a control device stack

.

15

. Additional comments and information:Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 12 of 20 1

. Control device description and ID number (or numbers, if several identical control devices are used to control a given emission source): Dry Alumina Scrubber System/Baghouse for North and South Bake Ovens

- 53001

2

. Stack or vent location of each control device (use NAD83 and include six decimal places and add rows as necessary):

ID No.: 53001 Latitude: 33.052590

________ Longitud e:

- 80.049781

____

3

. Design collection efficiency and outlet concentration (add rows as necessary):

* *See test report submitted for outlet concentrations

Pollutant Collection Outlet Source of efficiency * concentration * Estimation * (if known) (if know n)

PM Percent 0.025 3 mg/dscf

____ 5

____ PM10 Percent 0.009 0 mg/dscf

____ 5

____ PM2.5 Percent 0.0078 mg/dscf

____ 5

____ Total Fluorides Percent ** mg/dscf

____ 1

____ Hydrogen Fl uorides Percent ** mg/dscf

____ 1

____ POM Percent ** mg/dscf

____ 1

_____ COS Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ O ther (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________

* 1 = Performance testing 2 = Engineering judgment 3 = Manufacturer specs. 4 = Title V permit application 5 = Other (specify)

_______________________ 4

. Scrubber device type:

_____ Fluidized bed X Injection

_____ Other (specify or describe): _________________________________________

5

. Bag cleaning method:

_____ Pulse jet

_____ Reverse air X Shaker

_____ Other (describe)

_________________________________________________Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 13 of 20 6

. Pressure mode of operation: positive pressure X negative pressure

7

. Typical gas temperature: inlet to scrubber 220 °F outlet from bag house 185 °F

8

. Gas flow rate: 118,000 acfm (at bag house outlet) 100,733 dscfm

9

. Pressure drop: Across scrubber: N/A inches water column (in. H 2 O)
Across bag house: 8.3 inches water column (in. H 2 O)

10

. Solid to gas ratio: 0.42 lb/1,000 acf

11

. Alumina usage rate (differentiate between virgin and recycled alumina from potlines)

Type of Alumina Added Usage rate Units for usage rate

Virgin alumina 1. 0 Tons/hr

Recycled alumina Get info from Unit 21 14 Tons/hr

Other alumina (specify ________________)

12

. Identify each emission source served by this control device (add rows as necessary).

Source ID No(s). Description(s)

53001 North and So uth Bake Ovens

– Control Device 53001

13

. Indicate what operational parameters of the control device are monitored to ensure that the control device is operating properly:

X Alumina Feed rate X Fan amperage

X Static Pressure X Visible emissions opacity

Other (specify):

.

14

. What level of a monitored operational parameter triggers corrective action?

0.5 Alumina Feed rate (tons/hr) Fan amper age (amps)

8” wg static Pressure Visible emissions opacity (%)

Other (specify): Any VE from a control device stack

.

15

. Additional comments and information:Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 14 of 20 1

. Control device description and ID number (or numbers, if several identical control devices are used to control a given emission source): Scrubber for anode forming proces s

- 50054

2

. Stack or vent location of each control device (use NAD83 and include six decimal places and add rows as necessary):

ID No.: 50054 Latitude: 33.051873

________ Longitude:

- 80.050635

______

3

. Design collection efficiency and outlet conc entration (add rows as necessary): Review Title V application for outlet concentrations

Pollutant Collection Outlet Source of efficiency * concentration * Estimation * (if known) (if known)

PM Percent 0.75 lb/hr

_________ PM10 Percent 0.75 lb/hr

_________ PM2.5 Percent mg/dscf

_________ Total Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ Hydrogen Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ POM Percent 0.199 lb/hr

_________ COS Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Othe r (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________

* 1 = Performance testing 2 = Engineering judgment 3 = Manufacturer specs. 4 = Title V permit application 5 = Other (specify)

_______________________ 4

. Scrubber device type:

_____ Fluidized bed X Injection

_____ Other (specify or describe): _________________________________________

5

. Bag cleaning method:

X Pulse jet

_____ Reverse air Shaker

_____ Other (describe)

_________________________________________________Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 15 of 20 6

. Pressure mode of ope ration: positive pressure X negative pressure

7

. Typical gas temperature: inlet to scrubber N/A °F outlet from bag house 176 °F

8

. Gas flow rate: 38,816 acfm (at bag house outlet) dscfm

9

. Pressure drop: Across scrubber: N/A inches water column (in. H 2 O)
Across bag house: 6.5” inches water column (in. H 2 O)

10

. Solid to gas ratio : 1.73 lb/1,000 acf

11

. Coke usage rate (diffe rentiate between virgin and recycled alumina from potlines)

Type of Alumina Added Usage rate Units for usage rate

Virgin Coke 2.0 Tons/hr

Recycled Coke N/A

Other coke (specify ________________)

12

. Identify each emission source served by this control device (add rows as necessary).

Source ID No(s). Description(s)

81605 Scrubber for anode forming process

– Control Device 50054

13

. Indicate what operational parameters of the control device are monitored to ensure that the

control device i s operating properly:

X Coke Feed rate Fan amperage

X Static Pressure X Visible emissions opacity

Other (specify):

.

14

. What level of a monitored operational parameter triggers corrective action?

1.8 Coke Feed rate (tons/hr) Fan amperage (amps)

2.5 ” wg static Pressure Visible emissions opacity (%)

Other (specify): Any VE from a control device stack

.

15

. Additional comments and information:Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 16 of 20 Table 3 Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) Description

1

. Control device description and ID number (or numbers, if several identical control devices are used to control a given emission source):

2

. Stack or vent location of each control device (use NAD83 and include six decimal places and add rows as necessary) :

ID No.: _________ Latitude: _______________ Longitude: ________________

ID No.: _________ Latitude: _______________ Longitude: ________________

ID No.: _________ Latitude: _______________ Longitude: ________________

3

. Design collection efficiency and outlet concentration (add rows as necessary):

Pollutant Collection Outlet Source of efficiency * concentration * Estimation * (if known) (if known)

PM Percent mg/dscf

_________ PM10 Percent m g/dscf

_________ PM2.5 Percent mg/dscf

_________ Total Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ Hydrogen Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ POM Percent mg/dscf

_________ COS Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________

* 1 = Performance testing 2 = Engineering judgment 3 = Manufacturer specs. 4 = Title V permit application 5 = Other (specify) _______________________Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 17 of 20 4

. Device type: H igh

- voltage, single

- stage L ow

- voltage, two

- stage

W et D ry

O ther (specify or describe):

5

. Pressure mode of operation: positive pressure negative pressure

6

. Typical gas temperature: inlet ° F outlet ° F

7

. Gas flow rate: acfm (at ESP outlet) dscfm

8

. Collection plate surface area: __________ ft 2

9

. Secondary power : _____________ kW

10

. Identify each emission source served by this control device (add rows as necessary).

Source ID No(s). Description

11

. Indicate what operational parameters of the control device are monitored to ensure that the control device is operating properly:

Visible emissions Volumetric fl ow Fan amperage opacity rate

Secondary power Secondary voltage

Other (specify):

.

12

. What level of a monitored operational parameter triggers corrective action?

Visible emissions Volumetric flow Fan amperage opacity (%) rate (acfm) (amps)

Secondary power Secondary voltage (kW) (volts)

Oth er (specify):

.Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 18 of 20 13

. Has the collected dust been analyzed?

_____ Yes

_____ No

If yes, provide the average and range for each HAP constituent analyzed over the past y ear or the last 9 samples, whichever is fewer. Alternatively, attach the results of the analyses. Do not include results from the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).

14

. Additional comments and information:Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 19 of 20 Table 4 Bag House Description ( Only fill out Table 4 for bag houses that are not associated

with a dry alumina scrubber. Do not fill out Table 2 and Table 4 for any one bag house

. )

1

. Control device description and ID number (or numbers, if several identical control devices

are used to c ontrol a given emission source):

2

. Stack or vent location of each control device (use NAD83 and include six decimal places and add rows as necessary) :

ID No.: _________ Latitude: _______________ Longitude: ________________

ID No.: _________ Latitude:

_______________ Longitude: ________________

ID No.: _________ Latitude: _______________ Longitude: ________________

3

. Design collection efficiency and outlet concentration (add rows as necessary):

Pollutant Collection Outlet Source of efficiency * con centration * Estimation * (if known) (if known)

PM Percent mg/dscf

_________ PM10 Percent mg/dscf

_________ PM2.5 Percent mg/dscf

_________ Total Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ Hydrogen Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ POM Percent mg/dscf

_________ COS Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________

* 1 = Performance testing 2 = Engineering judgment 3 = Manufactu rer specs. 4 = Title V permit application 5 = Other (specify) _______________________

4

. Bag cleaning method:

_____ Pulse jet

_____ Reverse air

_____ Shaker

_____ Other (describe)

_________________________________________________

5

. Pressure mode of operatio n: positive pressure negative pressure

6

. Typical gas temperature: inlet ° F outlet ° F

7

. Gas flow rate: acfm (at bag house outlet) dscfm

8

. Pressure drop: inches water column (in. H 2 O)Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 20 of 20 9

. Air to cloth ratio: cfm/sf or fpm

10

. Identify each emission source served by this device (add rows as necessary).

Source ID No(s). Description(s)

11

. Indicate what operational parameters of the control device are monitored to ensure that the control device is operating properly:

_______ Volumetric flow rate

____________ Fan amperage

_______ Visible emissions opacity

____________ Pressure drop

Other (s pecify):

.

12

. What level of a monitored operational parameter triggers corrective action?

_______ Volumetric flow rate (acfm)

____________ Fan amperage (amps)

_______ Visible emissions opacity (%)

____________ Pressure drop (in. H 2 O)

Other (specify):

.

13

. Has the collected dust been analyzed?

_____ Yes

_____ No

If yes, provi de the average and range for each HAP constituent analyzed over the past year or last 9 samples, whichever is fewer. Alternatively, attach the results of the analyses. Do not include results from the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).

14

. Addi tional comments and information:Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 21 of 20 Table 5 Other Air Pollution Control Devices

1

. Control device description and ID number (or numbers, if several identical control devices are used to control a given emission source):

2

. Stack or vent location of each control device (use NAD83 and include six decimal places and add rows as necessary) :

ID No.: _________ Latitude: _______________ Longitude: ________________

ID No.: _________ Latitude: _______________ Longitude: ________________

ID No.: _________ La titude: _______________ Longitude: ________________

3

. Design collection efficiency and outlet concentration (add rows as necessary):

Pollutant Collection Outlet Source of efficiency * concentration * Estimation * (if known) (if known)

PM Pe rcent mg/dscf

_________ PM10 Percent mg/dscf

_________ PM2.5 Percent mg/dscf

_________ Total Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ Hydrogen Fluorides Percent mg/dscf

_________ POM Percent mg/dscf

_________ COS Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________ Other (specify) Percent mg/dscf

_________

* 1 = Performance testing 2 = Engineering judgment 3 = Manufacturer specs. 4 = Title V permit application 5 = Other (specify) ____

___________________
4

. Pressure mode of operation: positive pressure negative pressure

5

. Typical gas temperature: inlet ° F outlet ° F

6

. Gas flow rate: acfm Specify lo cation: _______________________________

D scfm

7

. Identify each emission source served by this control device ( add rows as necessary ).

Source ID No(s). Source description(s)Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 22 of 20 8

. Indicate what operational parameters of the control devi ce are monitored to ensure that the control device is operating properly :

Visible emissions opacity V olumetric flow rate

P ressure drop

O ther (specify):

.

9

. What level of a monitored operational parameter triggers corrective action ?

Visible emissions opacity (%) Volumetric flow rate (acfm)

Pressure drop (in. H 2 O)

Other (specify):

.

10

. Has the collected dust or sludge been analyzed?

_____ Yes

_____ No

______ Not Applicable

If yes, provide the average and range for each HAP constituent analyzed over the past year or last 9 samples, whichever is fewer. Alternatively, attach the results of the analyses. Do not include results from the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).

11

. Additi onal comments and information:Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 23 of 20 PART C: START

- UPS AND SHU TDOWNS

Please provide the information in Table 6 and questions below for each Subpart LL p otline during start

- up (the commencement of operation for any purpose) and shutdown (the cessation of operation for any purpose) operatio ns. For the purposes of Part C of Enclosure 1 start

- up and shutdown refers to the commencement and cessation of operations of a potline, not of an individual pot (e.g. after anode changes).

15

. Please provide a rationale, if applicable, for why application of the Subpart LL standards to a potline during start

- up or shutdown is not practica b l e economically or technologically

Not practicable economically: _ EPA Reference Methods 14 and 14A are designed to

measure TF roof emissions over only a subset of the smelting pots operating in a pot r oom

(roughly 10 or 12 pots out of 130 or 150), with the assumption that the pots being sampled

represent the entire potline during steady

- state operation . During potline startup, pots

located under a Method 14 or 14A sampling system do not represent the e ntire potline

because pots throughout the room are in various stages of startup or non

- steady

- state

operation. So, it is not technically practicable to either establish a standard for startup or

show compliance with a startup standard using the available EPA Reference Method.

Establishing a standard for startups is further complicated by the fact that startups are

rare and the conditions of a startup (and associated emissions) will vary depending on

whether a potline was shut down by an emergency power lo ss (e.g., an ice storm) or

whether the potline was intentionally shut down in a controlled manner. Work practice

standards are the only practicable means of regulating emissions during an aluminum

potline startup.

Collecting Method 14 or 14A samples re presentative of an the entire potline is not

economically practicable because this would require the installation and operation of 12

or 13 separate Reference Method sampling systems in each potroom to collect

representative compliance samples. These samp ling systems typically cost more than

$250,000 each to install and this level of expenditure is not practicable for the rare

occasion of startup at an individual potline.

Not practicable technologically: _______________________________________________

1 7

. Do you have test data that show any potline hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions during a start

- up or shutdown? (Check one)  Y X NEnclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 24 of 20 If yes:

a

. Provide a copy of the test data.

b

. Describe the operating conditions (e.g. tons of aluminum produced per day) at the time

of the testing.

______________________________________________________________________

_________________________ _____________________________________________

_________________________ _____________________________________________

1 8

. Do you have an operating plan to minimize emissions during start

- up and/or shutdown (e.g. a SS Plan) ? ( CHECK one) X Yes ____________ No

If “Yes,” please provide a copy of the operating plan.

19

. Please indicate below how often you perform the following activities during start

- up of your potlines by adding the following codes: A, S, N for A lways, S ometimes, or N ever.

__ A

__ a. Develop a potroom/potline start

- up schedule before start

- up

__ A

__ b

. Perform daily assessment of start

- up pro gress and any schedule changes

__ A

__ c

. Keep records of number of pots started per day

A d

. Bring potroom/potline scrubbers and exhaust fans on line prior to energi zing

first cell to be restarted

_

N

___ e

. Supply alumina at a higher rate t han during normal pot operation

If so, how mu ch higher? ____________(percent)

_

A

___ f

. Keep pots covered during start

- up

_

A

___ g

. Limit removal of covers or panels to pots being worked on

A h

. Keep primary capture/control system operating at all times during the start

- up

_

A

___ i. Monitor pot lines frequently during start

- up to identify sick or unstable pots

If so, do you u se the following methods to manage a “sick” or unstable pot

___ N

__ Adjust exhaust flow from pots

___ S

__ Adjust cell voltage and feeding levels

___ S

__ Monitor and adjust anode curr ent and liquid level

_____ Other corrective procedures. Please describe the corrective procedures applie d (use additional pages if needed):

_______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 25 of 20 2 0

. Please list any additional start

- up activities in the space below.

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 26 of 20 Table 6 Description of most recent potline start

- up and shutdown of each potline (Make additional copies this table as needed)

Potline ID

(as assigned in

the schematic of question 7) Date(s), duration, and description (e.g. planned shutdown fo r ..., or emergency shutdown due to ...) of

start

- up or shutdown Was the start

- up or shutdown covered by a

contingency plan for controlling emissions? (Y/N) What actions were taken to minimize emissions?

1 9/22/ 89

– Emergency Shut

- down Hurricane Hugo

All pots offline for ~10 days. All pots restarted within three

months. Yes Pots were cleaned before restarting, or in some cases relined to insure better operational stability. Proper hooding procedures were in place to minimize emissions.

2 9 /22/ 89

– Emergency Shut

- down Hurricane Hugo

All pots offline for ~10 days. All pots restarted within three

months. Yes Pots were cleaned before restarting, or in some cases relined to insure better operational stability. Proper hooding procedures were in place to minimize emissions.Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 27 of 20Enclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 28 of 20 PART D : PREVIOUSLY PERFORMED TESTING AND TEST REPORT DATA

2 1

. Submit emission test report result s for calendar year 2010 for polycyclic organic matter (POM) and total fluorides (TF) for any sources that have POM and/or TF emissions standards under Subpart LL. If available, submit emission test report results for any testing conducted from January 1, 2006 to the present for metal HAP (i.e. antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, hexavalent chromi um, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), TF, hydrogen fluoride (HF), particulate matter (PM), POM, speciated organic HAP data, and/or carbonyl sulfide (COS) for primary aluminum sources that currently do not have emission standards for those pol lutants under Subpart LL

. 2010 data needed for TF, HF, and POM, Reports in conference room 2010 test reports for POM and TF are included with submittal . There are no test reports for HAP metals for the period 2006

- present. Emission test reports for TF, H F, and POM for the period 2006

- 2009 were previously submitted on 2/25/10 as part of a previous information collection request.

We would prefer electronic copies of these reports, if available. If electronic copies of the test reports are not available, ha rd copies may be provided or test result summaries may be provided. The following details (at a minimum) must be included , if available :

(a) P ollutants and emission rates measured (e.g., lb/hr, gr/dscf, lb/ton),

(b) T he names of the test methods or proced ures used,

( c ) I nformation on actual production or pr ocessing rates during the test,

( d ) For COS emission tests, the sulfur content of the coke and pitch used in the anodes at the time the testing was conducted, and

(e) A statement that the process and any control devices were operating normally during the test, or if not, identify any abnormal or unrepresentative conditions.

2 2

. If emission controls were installed or upgraded for primary aluminum sources after October 7, 1997 to control emissions of POM f rom prebake potlines, emissions of POM from existing pitch storage tanks, and/or emissions of COS , please also include test reports, if available, including the information specified in 2 1 (a) through ( e ), for the most recent emission testing that was perfo rmed before these controls were installed or upgraded and identify them as “pre

- MACT test reports.” N/A

2 3

. Has any air monitoring, such as Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) s pectroscopy

, been performed at your facility to measure COS concentration and/or emissions of sulfur

oxides ? If so, please provide the most recent data for a normal operating time period

. Please include a description of the locations of sampling (reference the schematic submitted in response to question 7) , sampling technique, durati on of sampling, production rate during sampling, and potroom operations performed during the sampling

. N/A

2 4

. Has any air monitoring, such as FTIR s pectroscopy, been performed at your facility to

measure emissions of HF at the same time that TF samples w ere collected from the roof monitor? If so, please provide the most recent data for a normal operating time period. Please include a description of the locations of sampling (reference the schematicEnclosure 1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 1

- April 22 , 2011 Page 29 of 20 submitted in response to question 7), sampling technique , duration of sampling, production rate during sampling, and potroom operations performed during the sampling.

N/AEnclosure 2

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 2

- April 22

, 2011 Page 1 of 3 Test Procedures, Methods, and Reporting Requirements for the Information Collection Request for the Primary Aluminum Reduction Source Cate gory

This document provides an overview of approved methods, target pollutant s and units of measure, and reporting requirements for the primary aluminum reduction source category. See Enclosure 3 for details about EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act (C AA) section 114 (42 U.S.C. 7414) to request source emission test data. All recipients must complete and submit test

results by May 31, 2011

. This document will be referred to as the ‘primary aluminum reduction test program.’ The do cument is organized as fo llows:

1

. 0 Sampling and Chemical Analysis Procedures and Methods for M etallic HAP (including speciated hexavalent chromium)

2.0 How to Report Data

3.0 How to Submit Data

4.0 Co ntact Information for Questions on Test Plan and Reporting

1.0 Sampling and Chemical Analysis Procedures and Methods for Metallic HAP (including speciated hexavalent chromium)

1.1 Sampling

- Bag House and Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) Particulate Matter

Sample and analyze representative particulate matter (e.g. in the hoppers) collecte d by each of the bag houses or ESP used to control particulate matter emissions from primary aluminum potlines. In cases where solids from different compartments of a single bag

house or ESP are collected in multiple hoppers or multiple collection sacks, a single composite sample will be adequate. Also, if multiple potlines of the same type (e.g. HSS, SWPB, CWPB1, etc.) are supplied with alumina from the same alumina storage vessel, sampling of representative particulate matter from the bag house or ESP as sociated with one of those potlines will be adequate. Sampling should be conducted once per day for five consecutive operating days with a clean uncontaminated scoop or similar apparatus

. A ll samples collected should be the approximately the same weight an d stored in a clean

air

- tight container.

Guidance on sample collection can be found in of Chapter 4 of the document Superfund Program Representative Sampling Guidance, Volume 1: Soil (EPA 540/R

- 95/141), which is available through the following link:

http:/ /www.epa.gov/tio/download/char/sf_rep_samp_guid_soil.pdf

1.2 Sampling

– Wet Scrubber Sludge , Injected Slurry (if applicable), and Discharge Water

Sample and analyze a representative grab sample of the scrubber sludge , injected slurry (if applicable)

, and a ny aqueous blowdown stream discharged from the wet scrubber. If a separate stream of scrubber blowdown is discharged from the scrubber, collect a representative grab sample of this stream. Also, if multiple potlines of the same type (e.g. HSS, SWPB, CWPB1, etc.) are supplied with alumina from the same alumina storage vessel, sampling of representative scrubber sludge, injected slurry (if applicable), and any aqueous blowdown stream from the wet scrubber associated with one of those potlines will be adequate

. Sampling should be conducted once per day for five consecutiveEnclosure 2

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 2

- April 22

, 2011 Page 2 of 3 operating days. All samples collected should be the approximately the same weight or

volume and stored in a clean container.

1.3 Chemical Analysis

Analyze each sample of bag house or electros tatic precipitator particulate matter, scrubber sludge , injected slurry (if any), and scrubber blowdown (if any) for individual

HAP metals as listed in Table 1 .1. Also analyze each sample for hexavalent chromium

. Methods for chemical analysis are given in Table 1 .2.

Table 1.1 HAP Metals

Antimony Arsenic Beryllium

Cadmium Chromium Hexavalent Chromium

Cobalt Lead Manganese

Nickel Selenium

Table 1.2 Methods for Analysis of Samples

Analyte Procedure

HAP metals listed

in Table 1.1 EPA Method 3051A digestio n followed by ICP

- MS

as detailed in EPA Method 6020

Hexavalent

chromium EPA Method 3060A and EPA Method 218.6:

Extraction and Cr +6 Ion Chromatography

2.0 How to Report Data

2.1 Reporting Bag House or Electrostatic Precipitator Particulate Matter

, Wet Sc rubber Sludge, Injected Slurry, and Discharge Water Chemical Analyses

You must report the results of the chemical analyses of your bag house or electrostatic precipitator particulate matter and wet scrubber sludge, injected slurry, and discharge

water in a Microsoft ® Excel Template which is provided. If more than one sample is analyzed, you must make a copy of the worksheet and update the source ID in order to distinguish between each analysis of particulate matter collected from each selected bag

house. Af ter completing the worksheet, you must also submit an electronic copy of the chemical analysis report (PDF format preferred).

2.2 Calculating and Reporting Values Measured Below Method Detection Levels

See Appendix C

– Guidance for calculating and reportin g measurements less than detection levels for emissions data collection (ICR) programs

.Enclosure 2

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Enclosure 2

- April 22

, 2011 Page 3 of 3 3.0 How to Submit Data

Use one of three transmittal methods listed below. In order to avoid duplicate data and keep all data for a particular facility together, we req uest that you submit all of the data requested from your company in the same way. To submit your data:

• E

- mail an electronic copy of all requested files to primaryicr@epa.gov

.

• If the files are too large for your e

- mail system, you may upload the electronic files to a FTP site; if you would like to use this option, send an email to bahner@rti.org for

instructions on how to access the site.

• Mail a CD or DVD containing an electronic copy of all requested files to the E PA address shown in your Section 114 letter.

If you are submitting CBI, you must mail a separate CD or DVD containing only the CBI portion of your data to the EPA address shown in your Section 114 letter.

4.0 Contact Information for Questions on Test Plan and Reporting

For questions on the primary aluminum source category , contact:

David Putney (U.S. EPA) (919) 541

- 2016 putney.david@epa.gov

OR

Rochelle Boyd (U.S. EPA) (919) 541

- 1390 boyd.rochelle@epa.gov

For questions on the test methods contact:

Gerri Garwood (U.S. EPA) (919) 541

- 2406 garwood.gerri@epa.gov

OR

Raymond Merrill (U.S. EPA) (919) 541

- 5225 merrill.raymond@epa.gov

For questions on uploading files to the FTP site, contact:

Mark Bahner (RTI, International) (919) 541

- 6016 bahner@rti.orgAPPENDIX A

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Appendix A

- April 2 2 , 2011 Page 1 of 3 Abbreviations

, Acronyms , and Unit Conversions

acf a ctual cubic feet

acfm actual cubic feet per minute

acm actual cubic meters

acmm actual cubic meters per minute

ADL above detection level

APC air pollution control

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

atm atmospheres (unit of pressure)

BDL below detection level

Btu/hr British thermal units per hour

Btu/scf British thermal units per standard cubic foot

CAA Clean Air Act

CARB California Air Resources Board

CBI confidential business information

CEMS continuous emission monitoring system

CFR Code of F ederal Regulations

CO carbon monoxide

COS carbonyl sulfide

Cr chromium

CS 2 carbon disulfide

CTM Conditional Test Method day/yr days per year

°C degrees Celsius

°F degrees Fahrenheit

D/F dioxins and furans

DLL detection level limited

dscf dry standard cubi c feet

dscfm dry standard cubic feet per minute

dscm dry standard cubic meters

dscmm dry standard cubic meters per minute

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

ERT Electronic Reporting Tool

E SP electrostatic precipitator

ft foot or feet

ft 2 square feet

ft 3 cubic feet fpm feet per minute (acfm divided by ft 2 of filter area) fps feet per second gal gallon

gpm U.S. gallons per minute gr/dscf grains per dry standard cubic foot

g gram HAP hazardous air pollutants

HCl hydrogen chloride

HCN hydrogen cyanide

HF hydrogen fluorideAPPENDIX A

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Appendix A

- April 2 2 , 2011 Page 2 of 3 Hg mercury hr hour or hours hr/day hours per day

ICR information collection request

in inch or inches

in

. H 2 O inches of water (pressure drop) kg kilogram

kPa kilopascals

kv kilovolt

kw

- hr kilowatt hour

lb pound lb/day pounds per day lb/ga l pounds per U.S. gallon

lb/hr pounds per hour

lb/ton pounds per ton

m meter

m 3 cubic meters

MACT maximum achievable control technology

min minute or minutes Mg megagram

mg milligram mg/kg milligram per kilogram mg/l milligrams per liter

MM btu/hr millions of British thermal units per hour

MM scf millions of standard cubic feet

MM lb/yr million pounds per year μg/m 3 microgram per cubic meter

μm micrometer

NAICS North American Industry Classification System

NaOH sodium hydroxide

NESHAP National Emission Stan dards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

NO

x nitrogen oxides OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

OTM Other Test Method

PAH polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon

PAL primary aluminum reduction facility pdf Image file format produced with Adobe© or simil ar software

PM particulate matter

PM 10 particulate matter that is 10 micrometers or less in diameter

PM 2.5 particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers or less in diameter

POM polycyclic organic matter

ppmv parts per million by volume

ppmw parts per million by weight

RATA Relative Accuracy Test Audit

% percent

s second or seconds

scf standard cubic feet

scf/hr standard cubic feet per hourAPPENDIX A

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Appendix A

- April 2 2 , 2011 Page 3 of 3 scfm standard cubic feet per minute

scm standard cubic meters

SO 2 sulfur dioxide

SPPD Sector Policies and Programs Divisio n SS start

- up or shutdown

TCLP toxicity characteristic leaching procedure

TF total fluorides

THC total hydrocarbons tpd tons (short) per day tph tons (short) per hour

tpy tons (short) per year

TSP total suspended particulate

vol% volume percent, or percen t by volume

wt% weight percent, or percent by weight

yr year

To convert from To Multiply by

°C °F multiply by 1.8, then add 32

°F °C subtract 32, then multiply by 0.556

ft m 0. 3 048

ft/min m/min 0. 3 048

ft 2 m 2 0.0929

ft 3 m 3 0.028

g lb 0.0022 g/m 3 lb /ft 3 0.0000624

gr lb 0.000143 gr/dscf mg/dscm 2,290

in

. H 2 O mm H 2 O 25.4 kg/hr lb/hr 2.205

lb g 454

lb gr 7000

lb/ft 3 g/m 3 16,000

lb/hr kg/hr 0.454

m ft 3.28

m/min ft/min 3.28

mm H 2 O in H 2 O 0.0394

m 2 ft 2 10.76 mg/dscm gr/dscf 0.00044

m 3 ft 3 35 .31 Mg ton 1.1
ton (short) Mg 0.907APPENDIX B

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Appendix B

- April 2 2 , 2011 Page 1 of 5 

### List of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP )

CAS

Number Chemical Name

Antimony Compounds Arsenic Compoun ds (inorganic including arsine) Beryllium Compounds Cadmium Compounds Chromium Compounds Cobalt Compound s Coke Oven Emissions Cyanide Compounds 1

Glycol ethers 2

Lead Compounds Manganese Compounds Mercury Compounds

Fine mineral fibers 3

Nickel Compounds Polycylic Organic Matter 4 ( Report individual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by CAS number ). Radionuclides (including radon) 5

Selenium Compounds

75

- 07

- 0 Acetaldehyde

60

- 35

- 5 Acetamide

75

- 05

- 8 Acetonitrile

98

- 86

- 2 Acetophenone

53

- 96

- 3 2

- Acetylaminofluorene

107

- 02

- 8 Acrolein

79

- 06

- 1 Acrylamide

79

- 10

- 7 Acrylic acid

107

- 13

- 1 Acrylonitr ile

107

- 05

- 1 Allyl chloride

92

- 67

- 1 4

- Aminobiphenyl

62

- 53

- 3 Aniline

90

- 04

- 0 o

- Anisidine

1332

- 21

- 4 Asbestos

71

- 43

- 2 Benzene (including benzene from gasoline)

92

- 87

- 5 Benzidine

98

- 07

- 7 Benzotrichloride

100

- 44

- 7 Benzyl chloride

92

- 52

- 4 Biphenyl

117

- 81

- 7 Bis(2

- ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)

542

- 88

- 1 Bis(chloromethyl)ether

75

- 25

- 2 Bromoform

106

- 99

- 0 1,3

- Butadiene

156

- 62

- 7 Calcium cyanamideAPPENDIX B

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Appendix B

- April 2 2 , 2011 Page 2 of 5 CAS

Number Chemical Name

133

- 06

- 2 Captan

63

- 25

- 2 Carbaryl

75

- 15

- 0 Carbon disulfide

56

- 23

- 5 Carbon tetrachloride

463

- 58

- 1 Carbonyl su lfide

120

- 80

- 9 Catechol

133

- 90

- 4 Chloramben

57

- 74

- 9 Chlordane

7782

- 50

- 5 Chlorine

79

- 11

- 8 Chloroacetic acid

532

- 27

- 4 2

- Chloroacetophenone

108

- 90

- 7 Chlorobenzene

510

- 15

- 6 Chlorobenzilate

67

- 66

- 3 Chloroform

107

- 30

- 2 Chloromethyl methyl ether

126

- 99

- 8 Chloroprene

1319

- 77

- 3 Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers and mixture)

95

- 48

- 7 o

- Cresol

108

- 39

- 4 m

- Cresol

106

- 44

- 5 p

- Cresol

98

- 82

- 8 Cumene

94

- 75

- 7 2,4

- D, salts and esters

3547

- 04

- 4 DDE

334

- 88

- 3 Diazomethane

132

- 64

- 9 Dibenzofurans

96

- 12

- 8 1,2

- Dibrom o

- 3

- chloropropane

84

- 74

- 2 Dibutylphthalate

106

- 46

- 7 1,4

- Dichlorobenzene(p)

91

- 94

- 1 3,3

- Dichlorobenzidene

111

- 44

- 4 Dichloroethyl ether (Bis(2

- chloroethyl)ether)

542

- 75

- 6 1,3

- Dichloropropene

62

- 73

- 7 Dichlorvos

111

- 42

- 2 Diethanolamine

121

- 69

- 7 N,N

- Die thyl aniline (N,N

- Dimethylaniline)

64

- 67

- 5 Diethyl sulfate

119

- 90

- 4 3,3

- Dimethoxybenzidine

60

- 11

- 7 Dimethyl aminoazobenzene

119

- 93

- 7 3,3'

- Dimethyl benzidine

79

- 44

- 7 Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride

68

- 12

- 2 Dimethyl formamide

57

- 14

- 7 1,1

- Dimethyl hydrazin e 131

- 11

- 3 Dimethyl phthalate

77

- 78

- 1 Dimethyl sulfate

534

- 52

- 1 4,6

- Dinitro

- o

- cresol, and saltsAPPENDIX B

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Appendix B

- April 2 2 , 2011 Page 3 of 5 CAS

Number Chemical Name

51

- 28

- 5 2,4

- Dinitrophenol

121

- 14

- 2 2,4

- Dinitrotoluene

123

- 91

- 1 1,4

- Dioxane (1,4

- Diethyleneoxide)

122

- 66

- 7 1,2

- Diphenylhydrazine

106

- 89

- 8 Epichlorohydrin (l

- Chloro

- 2,3

- epoxypropane)

106

- 88

- 7 1,2

- Epoxybutane

140

- 88

- 5 Ethyl acrylate

100

- 41

- 4 Ethyl benzene

51

- 79

- 6 Ethyl carbamate (Urethane)

75

- 00

- 3 Ethyl chloride (Chloroethane)

106

- 93

- 4 Ethylene dibromide (Dibromoethane)

107

- 06

- 2 Ethylene dichloride (1 ,2

- Dichloroethane)

107

- 21

- 1 Ethylene glycol

151

- 56

- 4 Ethylene imine (Aziridine)

75

- 21

- 8 Ethylene oxide

96

- 45

- 7 Ethylene thiourea

75

- 34

- 3 Ethylidene dichloride (1,1

- Dichloroethane)

50

- 00

- 0 Formaldehyde

76

- 44

- 8 Heptachlor

118

- 74

- 1 Hexachlorobenzene

87

- 68

- 3 Hexachlorobutadiene

77

- 47

- 4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

67

- 72

- 1 Hexachloroethane

822

- 06

- 0 Hexamethylene

- 1,6

- diisocyanate

680

- 31

- 9 Hexamethylphosphoramide

110

- 54

- 3 Hexane

18540

- 29

- 9 Hexavalent chromium

302

- 01

- 2 Hydrazine

7647

- 01

- 0 Hydrochlori c acid

7664

- 39

- 3 Hydrogen fluoride (Hydrofluoric acid)

123

- 31

- 9 Hydroquinone

78

- 59

- 1 Isophorone

58

- 89

- 9 Lindane (all isomers)

108

- 31

- 6 Maleic anhydride

67

- 56

- 1 Methanol

72

- 43

- 5 Methoxychlor

74

- 83

- 9 Methyl bromide (Bromomethane)

74

- 87

- 3 Methyl chlo ride (Chloromethane)

71

- 55

- 6 Methyl chloroform (1,1,1

- Trichloroethane)

60

- 34

- 4 Methyl hydrazine

74

- 88

- 4 Methyl iodide (Iodomethane)

108

- 10

- 1 Methyl isobutyl ketone (Hexone)

624

- 83

- 9 Methyl isocyanate

80

- 62

- 6 Methyl methacrylateAPPENDIX B

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Appendix B

- April 2 2 , 2011 Page 4 of 5 CAS

Number Chemical Name

1634

- 04

- 4 Methyl tert butyl ether

101

- 14

- 4 4,4

- Methylene bis(2

- chloroaniline)

75

- 09

- 2 Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)

101

- 68

- 8 Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI)

101

- 77

- 9 4,4'¬

- Methylenedianiline

91

- 20

- 3 Naphthalene

98

- 95

- 3 Nitrobenzene

92

- 93

- 3 4

- Nitrobiphenyl

100

- 02

- 7 4

- Nitrophenol

79

- 46

- 9 2

- Nitropropane

684

- 93

- 5 N

- Nitroso

- N

- methylurea

62

- 75

- 9 N

- Nitrosodimethylamine

59

- 89

- 2 N

- Nitrosomorpholine

56

- 38

- 2 Parathion

82

- 68

- 8 Pentachloronitrobenzene (Quintobenzene)

87

- 86

- 5 Pentachlorophenol

108

- 95

- 2 Phenol

10 6

- 50

- 3 p

- Phenylenediamine

75

- 44

- 5 Phosgene

7803

- 51

- 2 Phosphine

7723

- 14

- 0 Phosphorus

85

- 44

- 9 Phthalic anhydride

1336

- 36

- 3 Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors)

1 120

- 71

- 4 1,3

- Propane sultone

57

- 57

- 8 beta

- Propiolactone

123

- 38

- 6 Propionaldehyde

114

- 26

- 1 Propoxur (Baygon)

78

- 87

- 5 Propylene dichloride (1,2

- Dichloropropane)

75

- 56

- 9 Propylene oxide

75

- 55

- 8 1,2

- Propylenimine (2

- Methyl aziridine)

91

- 22

- 5 Quinoline

106

- 51

- 4 Quinone

100

- 42

- 5 Styrene

96

- 09

- 3 Styrene oxide

1746

- 01

- 6 2,3,7,8

- Tetrachlorodib enzo

- p

- dioxin

79

- 34

- 5 1,1,2,2

- Tetrachloroethane

127

- 18

- 4 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene)

7550

- 45

- 0 Titanium tetrachloride

108

- 88

- 3 Toluene

95

- 80

- 7 2,4

- Toluene diamine

584

- 84

- 9 2,4

- Toluene diisocyanate

95

- 53

- 4 o

- Toluidine

8001

- 35

- 2 Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene)

120

- 82

- 1 1,2,4

- TrichlorobenzeneAPPENDIX B

Primary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Appendix B

- April 2 2 , 2011 Page 5 of 5 CAS

Number Chemical Name

79

- 00

- 5 1,1,2

- Trichloroethane

79

- 01

- 6 Trichloroethylene

95

- 95

- 4 2,4,5

- Trichlorophenol

88

- 06

- 2 2,4,6

- Trichlorophenol

121

- 44

- 8 Triethylamine

1582

- 09

- 8 Trifluralin

540

- 84

- 1 2,2,4

- Trimethylpentane

108

- 05

- 4 Vinyl acetate

593

- 60

- 2 Vinyl bromide

75

- 01

- 4 Vinyl chloride

75

- 35

- 4 Vinylidene chloride (1,1

- Dichloroethylene)

1330

- 20

- 7 Xylenes (isomers and mixture)

95

- 47

- 6 o

- Xylenes

108

- 38

- 3 m

- Xylenes

106

- 42

- 3 p

- Xylenes

NOTE: For all listings above w hich contain the word "compounds" and for glycol
ethers, the following applies: Unless otherwise specified, these listings are defined as
including any unique chemical substance that contains the named chemical (i.e.,
antimony, arsenic, etc.) as part of th at chemical's infrastructure.

1: X'CN where X = H' or any other group where a formal dissociation may occur. For
example KCN or Ca(CN)2

2: Includes mono

- and di

- ethers of ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, and triethylene
glycol R

- (OCH2CH2)n

- OR' where :

n = 1, 2, or 3

R = alkyl or aryl groups

R' = R, H, or groups which, when removed, yield glycol ethers with the structure:

R

- (OCH2CH)n

- OH. Polymers are excluded from the glycol category. Also
excludes ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE) (2

- Butoxyethanol )
(Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) No. 111

- 76

- 2) and surfactant alcohol
ethoxylates and their derivatives (SAED).

3: Includes mineral fiber emissions from facilities manufacturing or processing glass,
rock, or slag fibers (or other mineral derived fibers) of average diameter 1

micrometer or less.

4: Includes organic compounds with more than one benzene ring, and which have a
boiling point greater than or equal to 100o C. Report individual polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons by CAS number.

5: A type of atom whi ch spontaneously undergoes radioactive decay.APPENDIX C

Pri mary Aluminum Reduction Section 114 Appendix C

- April 2 2 , 2011 Page 1 of 1 Guidance For Calculating And Reporting Measurements Less Than Method Detection Levels For Test Data Submitted in Response to Information Collection Request (ICR) Programs

Identify the status of measured valu es relative to detection levels on the spreadsheet using the following descriptions:

• BDL (below detection level)

– all analytical values used to calculate and report a fabric filter particulate matter, electrostatic precipitator particulate matter, sludge, or scrubber blowdown metal analysis are less than the laboratory’s reported detection level(s);

• DLL (detection level limited)

– at least one

, but not all

, values used to calculate and report a fabric filter particulate matter, electrostatic precipitator p articulate matter, sludge, or scrubber blowdown metal analysis are less than the laboratory’s reported detection level(s); or

• ADL (above detection level)

– all analytical values used to calculate and report a fabric filter particulate matter, electrostatic precipitator particulate matter, sludge, or scrubber blowdown metal analysis are greater than the laboratory’s reported detection level(s).

For each reported emissions value, insert the appropriate flag (i.e. BDL, DLL, or ADL) in

the Note line of the Mic rosoft® Excel emission test spreadsheet template.

When reporting and calculating individual test run data:

• For analytical data reported from the lab as “nondetect” or “below detection level;”

− Include a brief description of the procedures used to determine the analytical

detection levels in the Note line of the Microsoft® Excel emission test spreadsheet template.

− Describe these procedures completely in a separate attachment including the measurements made, the standards used, and the statistical procedures a pplied.

− Report the calculated emissions concentration or rate result as a bracketed “less than” detection level value (e.g., [<0.0105]) in the Microsoft® Excel emission test spreadsheet template

− Report as numerical values (i.e., no brackets or < symbol) any analytical data measured above the detection level including any data between the analytical detection level and a laboratory

- specific reporting or quantification level (i.e., flag as ADL).