alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, John P. Crowley,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc.(the “Company”);

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.                 The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and we have:

(i)            designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report was being prepared;

(ii)        evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report; and

(iii)    disclosed in this report anychange in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of a quarterly report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                 The Company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

(i)            all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(ii)        any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: May 9,2006
| /s/ JOHN P. CROWLEY        | * * |
|----------------------------|----------|
| John P. Crowley            | * * |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* | * * |

 

----
#### § 201.1 Meaning of words.

Words used in this part in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.

[19 FR 4524, July 22, 1954]
Exhibit 33.2



MANAGEMENT’S
ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE



Management of the Agency
and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Management has determined
that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the
period as follows:



Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and
certain privately issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile
loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”)



Applicable
Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria
in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following
criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv),
which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable
Servicing Criteria”).



Period:
Twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the “Period”).



With respect to the
Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to
the Applicable Servicing Criteria:



| | · | The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



KPMG LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.



CITIBANK,
N.A.



By: /s/ Karen
Montbach

Its: Managing
Director

Dated: February
28, 2013
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Alfonso de Angoitia Noriega, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Company’s annual report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: February 14, 2018

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Alfonso de   Angoitia Noriega |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                             | Alfonso de Angoitia   Noriega |
|   |   | Title:                            | Co-Chief Executive   Officer |

 

----
### §5111. Report on diversity at Coast Guard Academy

(a) In General.—Not later than January 15, 2021, and annually thereafter, the Commandant shall submit a report on diversity at the Coast Guard Academy to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.

(b) Contents.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) the status of the implementation of the plan required under section 8272 of the Elijah E. Cummings Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2020;

(2) specific information on outreach and recruitment activities for the preceding year, including the effectiveness of the Coast Guard Academy minority outreach team program described under section 1905 and of outreach and recruitment activities in the territories and other possessions of the United States;

(3) enrollment information about the incoming class, including the gender, race, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic background, and State of residence of Coast Guard Academy cadets;

(4) information on class retention, outcomes, and graduation rates, including the race, gender, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic background, and State of residence of Coast Guard Academy cadets;

(5) information on efforts to retain diverse cadets, including through professional development and professional advancement programs for staff and faculty; and

(6) a summary of reported allegations of discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, gender, or religion for the preceding 5 years.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXII [LXXXII], §8273, Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4683.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 8272 of the Elijah E. Cummings Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2020, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is section 8272 of Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXII [LXXXII], Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4681, which is set out as a note under section 1901 of this title.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                                    FORM 10-K

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That each person whose signature appears below
has made, constituted, and appointed, and by this instrument does make,
constitute, and appoint Robert M. Wilson, Glenn E. Morrical, David L. Genger and
Robert T. Wilson, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney, with full
power of substitution and re-substitution, to affix for him and in his name, as
attorney-in-fact his signature as a Director or Officer, or both, of ROBERDS,
INC., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), to the Company's annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to any and all amendments and exhibits to
that Form 10-K, and to any and all applications and other documents pertaining
thereto, giving and granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power and
authority to do and perform every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done,
as fully as the undersigned might do or could do if personally present, and
hereby ratifies and confirms all that each of such attorneys-in-fact or any such
substitute shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed this 17th day of
February, 1998.

/s/ Kenneth W. Fletcher                    /s/ Jerry L. Kirby
------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Kenneth W. Fletcher                        Jerry L. Kirby

/s/ Robert M. Wilson
-----------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Robert M. Wilson                           Gilbert P. Williamson

/s/ Carl E. Gunter                         /s/ Donald C. Wright
-----------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Carl E. Gunter                             Donald C. Wright

/s/ Michael A. Bruns                       /s/ Howard W. Smith
-----------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Michael A. Bruns                           Howard W. Smith

/s/ James F. Robeson
-----------------------------------
James F. Robeson








                                       82
Exhibit 21

                            Foamex International Inc.
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                              as of January 2, 2005


                                                    State or Other Jurisdiction
Subsidiaries                                        of Incorporation

Espumas Foamex Espana, S.L.                         Spain
FMXI, Inc.                                          Delaware
Foamex Asia, Inc.                                   Delaware
Foamex Aviation, Inc.                               Delaware
Foamex Canada Inc.                                  Canada
Foamex Capital Corporation                          Delaware
Foamex Carpet Cushion LLC                           Delaware
Foamex Delaware, Inc.                               Delaware
Foamex de Acuna, S.A. de C.V.                       Mexico
Foamex de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                      Mexico
Foamex de Cuautitlan, S.A. de C.V.                  Mexico
Foamex de Juarez, S.A. de C.V.                      Mexico
Foamex Latin America, Inc.                          Delaware
Foamex L.P.                                         Delaware
Foamex Mexico, Inc.                                 Delaware
Foamex Mexico II, Inc.                              Delaware
Grupo Foamex de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                Mexico
JPSGP Inc.                                          Delaware
Servicios Administrativos Foamex, S.A. de C.V.      Mexico
Maquila Foamex, S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico
Corte y Costura Foamex, S.A. de C.V.                Mexico
Administration Foamex, S.A. de C.V.                 Mexico
### §550. Marking pierheads in certain lakes

The Commandant of the Coast Guard shall properly mark all pierheads belonging to the United States situated on the northern and northwestern lakes, whenever he is duly notified by the department charged with the construction or repair of pierheads that the construction or repair of any such pierhead has been completed.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8509(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4756.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 551 to 555 were renumbered sections 2921 to 2925 of this title, respectively.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACKIE MELLOW; SHARON A.

MARTIN,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-17053

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00027-LKKEFB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jackie Mellow and Sharon A. Martin appeal pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing their action alleging a conspiracy among government officials

to interfere with their property rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

FILED

JAN 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
/Research 2 08-17053

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Gaskell v. Weir, 10 F.3d 626, 628

(9th Cir. 1993), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 because the record supports the

conclusion that Plaintiffs filed the action for purposes of harassment. See Fed. R.

Civ. P. 11 (stating that a court may sanction a party sua sponte, after notice and a

reasonable opportunity to respond, for filing a pleading presented for an improper

purpose); Hudson v. Moore Bus. Forms, Inc., 836 F.2d 1156, 1163 (9th Cir. 1987)

(“The district court has wide discretion in determining the appropriate sanction for

a Rule 11 violation.”). 

Appellants’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist.

Court, 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977) (discussing five guidelines to 

determine whether the “extraordinary” remedy of mandamus is warranted).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2007096EN.01002201.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/22

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyny w Łodzi (Regional Administrative Court, Łódź) — Ceramika Paradyż sp.z oo v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Łodzi

(Case C-168/06) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - First and Sixth VAT Directives - Facts pre-dating the accession of the Republic of Poland to the European Union - Jurisdiction of the Court)

(2007/C 96/38)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyny w Łodzi

Parties

Applicant: Ceramika Paradyż sp.z oo

Applicant:

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Łodzi

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyny w Łodzi (Poland) — Interpretation of the second paragraph of Article 2 of First Council Directive 67/227/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes (OJ 1967 L 71, p. 1301), and Articles 2, 10(1)(a), 10(2) and 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — National legislation providing for the imposition of an additional tax in cases where irregularities are found in the return submitted by the taxable person

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Communities has no jurisdiction to reply to the questions referred by the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyny w Łodzi.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,705
<INVENTORY>                                     25,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         487,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,097,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        715,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           558
<OTHER-SE>                                     286,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,097,340
<SALES>                                         27,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,315
<CGS>                                           18,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,379
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER II—OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
# C_2012138EN.01004001.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/40

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB

(Case F-105/10) (1)

(2012/C 138/99)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011, p. 65.

---
# C_2007082EN.01002802.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-222/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/58)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
I, Bryan J. Cusworth, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of TBA EntertainmentCorporation. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during thefourth fiscal quarter of 2003 that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting   April14, 2004 By: /s/ Bryan J. Cusworth Bryan J. Cusworth Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)