alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cancellation of Standby Letter Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.2

 

 
  
 Comerica

 Request for Letter of Credit Amendment 
 (MT 707) 
 Date May 22, 2008 
 International Trade Services Dept. 
 Comerica Bank 
 Northern CA: 201 Spear St., Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94105 
 Southern CA: 9920 South La Cienga Blvd., 11th Floor Inglewood, CA 90301 
 FOR BANK USE ONLY 
 31C Date of issuance of letter of credit 
 30 Date of issuance of this amendment 
 20 Please amend Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. SBLC# 030379-40 
 Deliver by: Mail to: Ben. App. Other Cable/Telex Courier to: Ben. App. Other 
 59 In favor of 
 NAME OF BENEFICIARY 
 Amend as follows: 
 32B Amount is increased by $ (foreign currency) 
 33B Amount is decreased by $ (foreign currency) 
 34B New amount after
amendment § 
 31E Latest negotiation/expiration date is extended to 
 79 Latest shipping date is extended to 
 Other instructions Please cancel the above standby LC# SBL # 630379-40 issued to Core Mills 
 All other terms and conditions of this credit remain unchanged. It is understood that this amendment is subject to acceptance by the beneficiary and also to the Application and Agreement pertaining to this letter of credit. The
undersigned applicant warrants that no shipment involved in this amendment is in violation of U.S. Treasury Foreign Assets Control or Cuban Assets Control Regulations. 
 Yours very truly, 
 Cygne Designs, Inc. 
 NAME OF APPLICANT 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TITLE 
 Niomi Custodio - Corp. Controller 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TITLE 
 CONTACT NAME 
 (323) 201-0950 Ext. 220 
 TELEPHONE NUMBER 
 FOR USE BY AFFILIATE OR CORRESPONDENT BANK ONLY 
 APPROVED: 
 NAME OF APPLICANT’S BANK 
 By: 
 Its: VP 
 OFFICIAL TITLE 
 TELEPHONE NUMBER 
 PLEASE NOTE: The above must be executed if the letter of credit was directed through an affiliate or correspondent bank of Comerica Bank.

 07/01/2003
### **CHAPTER 4—CHINA TRADE**

Sec.
141.
Short title.
142.
Definitions.
143.
Registrar; designation; station; supervision by Secretary of Commerce.
144.
China trade corporations.
144a.
Incorporation fee for perpetual existence.
145.
Certificate of incorporation.
146.
General powers of corporation.
146a.
Jurisdiction of suits by or against China Trade Act corporation.
147.
Stock; issuance at par value.
148.
Payment of stock in real or personal property.
149.
Bylaws.
150.
Stockholders' meetings.
151.
Directors.
152.
Reports; records for public inspection.
153.
Dividends.
154.
Investigations by registrar; revocation of certificate of incorporation.
155.
Authority of registrar in obtaining evidence.
156.
Dissolution of corporation; trustees.
157.
Regulations and fees; disposition of fees and penalties.
158.
False or fraudulent statements prohibited; penalties.
159.
Unauthorized use of legend; penalty.
160.
Maintenance of agent for service.
161.
Alteration, amendment, or repeal.
162.
Creation of China corporations restricted.
#### W. T. Westbrook v. Gus Frederickson.

1. Former Decisions — A *the Same Cases, Govern.*— When a case on being reversed and remanded is tried again upon the same issues and in accordance with the decision of the court remanding it, such decision will be binding upon the trial court and upon this court in future appeals.

*41Trover. — Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ford County: the Hon. Colostin D. Myers, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1901.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed September 11, 1901.

Cloud, Moffett & Thompson and C. E. Beach, attorneys for appellant.

O. H. Wylie and Tipton & Tipton, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Burroughs

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was before us at a former term and for the reasons expressed in the opinion reported in 89 Ill. App. 193, the judgment which had been rendered in favor of W. T. Westbrook (present appellant) was reversed and the case remanded for another trial for the reasons therein stated.

After the case was remanded and had been reinstated, it was stipulated by the parties that it be tried by the court (jury being waived) upon the same evidence produced at a former trial, and the same was read to the court from the bill of exceptions on file in the case, and the court found for Cus Frederickson (present appellee) and rendered judgment in his favor for $183.83.

Appellant, W. T. Westbrook, now brings the case to this court by appeal, and to reverse the latter judgment, assigns and argues for error, that the Circuit Court refused improperly to hold as the law of the case, the second and sixth propositions submitted to it by him, and improperly rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff (appellee) against him.

The finding and judgment of the Circuit Court which are now alleged to have been erroneously made, were upon the same issues and evidence which were in the record when the case was formerly before us and are in accordance with the decision which we then rendered in it, which was binding upon the Circuit Court and is also upon this court; therefore the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.
### §3756. Grade on entry upon active duty

A Reserve officer ordered to active duty or active duty for training shall be ordered in the grade held; except that the Secretary may authorize a higher grade.

(Added Pub. L. 96–322, §1, Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1015, §745; renumbered §3756, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §118(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 776 of this title prior to the complete revision of former chapter 21 of this title by Pub. L. 96–322.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 745 of this title as this section.
§ 166.5 Licensed garbage-treatment facility standards. Garbage-treatment facilities shall be maintained as set forth in this section. ( a ) Insects and animals shall be controlled. Accumulation of any material at the facility where insects and rodents may breed is prohibited.
( b ) Equipment used for handling untreated garbage, except for the containers in which the garbage has been treated, may not be subsequently used in the feeding of swine unless first cleaned and disinfected as set forth in § 166.14(b).
( c ) Untreated garbage that is not to be fed to swine and materials in association with such garbage shall be disposed of in a manner consistent with all applicable governmental environmental regulations and in an area inaccessible to swine.
[47 FR 49945, Nov. 3, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 4890, Feb. 18, 1987]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the
Company), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Weldon, Chief Financial Officer and
President of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d));
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Steven Weldon      
|Steven Weldon          
|Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 15, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007025EN.01000201.xml

| 3.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 February 2007

(2007/C 25/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3020 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4542 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66135 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0575 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6175 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,01 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1355 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5791 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,202 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,77 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9028 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3850 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,877 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8260 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6821 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5410 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1646 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9169 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9994 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 220,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3493 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0983 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3710 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 818,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5577 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,407 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4540 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,524 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3020

JPY

Japanese yen

157,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4542

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66135

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0575

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6175

ISK

Iceland króna

89,01

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1355

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5791

CZK

Czech koruna

28,202

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,77

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9028

RON

Romanian leu

3,3850

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,877

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8260

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6821

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5410

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1646

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9169

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9994

KRW

South Korean won

1 220,36

ZAR

South African rand

9,3493

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0983

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3710

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 818,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5577

PHP

Philippine peso

63,407

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4540

THB

Thai baht

45,524

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month
period ending November 1, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Herndon, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/Carl Herndon
     ---------------
     Carl Herndon
     Principal Executive Officer
     December 15, 2003
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1397

To provide for the retention of the name of the geologic formation known

as ‘‘Devils Tower’’ at the Devils Tower National Monument in the

State of Wyoming.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 20, 1999

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. THOMAS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

A BILL

To provide for the retention of the name of the geologic

formation known as ‘‘Devils Tower’’ at the Devils Tower

National Monument in the State of Wyoming.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding any other authority of law, the

4 mountain located 44°42′58′′ N., by 104°35′32′′ W., shall

5 continue to be named and referred to for all purposes as

6 Devils Tower.

Æ
# C_2006281EN.01003302.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/33

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — Italy and Wam v Commission

(Joined Cases T-304/04 and T-316/04) (1)

1

(State aid - Loans at reduced rates intended to make it possible to become established in certain non-member countries - Effect on trade between Member States and distortion of competition - Statement of reasons)

(2006/C 281/57)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Italian Republic (represented initially by A. Cingolo, and subsequently by P. Gentili, lawyers) and Wam SpA (Cavezzo di Modena, Italy) (represented by E. Giliani, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/177/EC of 19 May 2004 on State aid No C 4/2003 (ex NN 102/2002) implemented by Italy for WAM SpA (OJ 2006 L 63, p. 11).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2006/177/EC of 19 May 2004 on State aid No C 4/2003 (ex NN 102/2002) implemented by Italy for WAM SpA (OJ 2006 L 63, p. 11); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2006/177/EC of 19 May 2004 on State aid No C 4/2003 (ex NN 102/2002) implemented by Italy for WAM SpA (OJ 2006 L 63, p. 11);

| 2. | Dismisses the actions as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred, in Case T-304/04, by the Italian Republic and, in Case T-316/04, by Wam, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred, in Case T-304/04, by the Italian Republic and, in Case T-316/04, by Wam, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 251 of 9.10.2004.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AD11-6-000]

                    On February 8, 2011, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission convened a Commissioner-led technical conference regarding priorities for addressing risks to the reliability of the Bulk-Power System, as previously announced.[1]                                          Any entity or person wishing to submit written comments regarding the matters discussed at that technical conference should submit such comments in this docket, AD11-6-000, on or before March 21, 2011.                

Dated: February 17, 2011.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Notice of Technical Conference re Priorities for Addressing Risks to the Reliability of the Bulk-Power System,*76 FR 2369 (January 13, 2011), as supplemented by the                         *Reliability Technical Conference Agenda*                         issued January 7, 2011.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2011-4262 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00300-CV 

CASANDRA DAVIS APPELLANT

V.

RIDGMAR SQUARE APTS APPELLEE 

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-004031-1

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On September 16, 2014, and September 30, 2014, we notified appellant in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $195 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellant has not paid the $195 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 16, 2013,

2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and, MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED: October 23, 2014

 

2See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Aug. 16, 2013) (listing fees in courts of 

appeals).
### SUBCHAPTER I—DISCLOSURE OF NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Armymodernization strategy**** 
SuDoc Number:D 101.1/22:
ItemNumber:0325-A-06(online)
CGPSystem Number:000678226
 
2008 | 2010| 2012 | 2019 | 2021
 
12/13/2022**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDE AMERICA CORPORATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                       3,551
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               12,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   983
<INVENTORY>                                                    250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            16,331
<PP&E>                                                      10,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                              6,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              64,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       14,099
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       31,823
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        57
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (23,807)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                64,726
<SALES>                                                     12,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            12,006
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            11,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           1,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (1,069)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (1,085)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (1,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.30)
        

</TABLE>
Accreditation?

Adequate Regulatory Oversight

- What % of errors is acceptable?

- We see about 50% and they know we’re coming out to observe.

- At ~90% of the test programs observed, only about 5-10% of 

the test programs have unobserved errors. Some of those are 

found in the test report reviews.
### SUBCHAPTER III—ECONOMIC STABILIZATION AND ASSISTANCE TO SEVERELY DISTRESSED SECTORS OF THE UNITED STATES ECONOMY
§ 104.6 Form and content of internal communications reports (52 U.S.C. 30101(9)(B)(iii)). ( a ) *Form.* Every membership organization or corporation which makes disbursements for communications pursuant to 11 CFR 100.134(a) and 114.3 shall report to the Commission on FEC Form 7 such costs which are directly attributable to any communication expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate (other than a communication primarily devoted to subjects other than the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate), if such costs exceed $2,000 for any election. ( 1 ) For the purposes of 11 CFR 104.6(a), *election* means two separate processes in a calendar year, to each of which the $2,000 threshold described above applies separately. The first process is comprised of all primary elections for federal office, wherever and whenever held; the second process is comprised of all general elections for federal office, wherever and whenever held.
( 2 ) The term election shall also include each special election held to fill a vacancy in a Federal office (11 CFR 100.2(f)) or each runoff election (11 CFR 100.2(d)).
( b ) *Filing dates.* Organizations required to report under 11 CFR 104.6(a) shall file such reports during a calendar year in which a regularly scheduled general election is held. Such reports shall be filed quarterly in accordance with 11 CFR 104.5(a)(1) and, with respect to any general election, in accordance with 11 CFR 104.5(a)(2)(i). The organization shall be required to file reports beginning with the first reporting period during which the aggregate cost for such communications exceeds $2,000 per election as defined in 11 CFR 104.6(a)(1), and for each quarter thereafter in which the organization makes additional disbursements in connection with the same election.
( c ) Each report filed under 11 CFR 104.6 shall include, for each communication: ( 1 ) The type of communication (such as direct mail or telephone);
( 2 ) The date(s) of the communication;
( 3 ) The name of the candidate, the office sought (and the district and state of the office, if applicable), and whether the communication was for the primary or general election;
( 4 ) Whether the communication was in support of or in opposition to, a particular candidate; and
( 5 ) The cost of the communication.
[45 FR 15108, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 67 FR 78680, Dec. 26, 2002; 79 FR 16663, Mar. 26, 2014; 89 FR 216, Jan. 2, 2024]