alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007056EN.01002902.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/29

---

Action brought on 8 December 2006 — Rath v OHIM — Sanorell Pharma (Immunocell)

(Case T-368/06)

(2007/C 56/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Matthias Rath (Cape Town, South Africa) (represented by: S. Ziegler, C. Kleiner and F. Dehn, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sanorell Pharma GmbH & Co.

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 October 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 October 2006;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Immunocell’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 16 and 41 (Registration No 1 065 903).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Sanorell Pharma GmbH & Co.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘IMMUNORELL’ for goods in Class 5 (Community trade mark No 808 014), the opposition being brought only against the registration in Class 5.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition granted, partial rejection of the application.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The contested decision infringes Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 11, 1994, p. 1).

1

---
### §1107. Extension of major acquisition program contracts

(a) In General.—Notwithstanding section 1105(a)(2) of this title and section 2304 1 of title 10, and subject to subsections (b) and (c) of this section, the Secretary may acquire additional units procured under a Coast Guard major acquisition program contract, by extension of such contract without competition, if the Director of the Cost Analysis Division of the Department of Homeland Security determines that the costs that would be saved through award of a new contract in accordance with such sections would not exceed the costs of such an award.

(b) Limitation on Number of Additional Units.—The number of additional units acquired under a contract extension under this section may not exceed the number of additional units for which such determination is made.

(c) Determination of Costs Upon Request.—The Director of the Cost Analysis Division of the Department of Homeland Security shall, at the request of the Secretary, determine for purposes of this section—

(1) the costs that would be saved through award of a new major acquisition program contract in accordance with section 1105(a)(2) for the acquisition of a number of additional units specified by the Secretary; and

(2) the costs of such award, including the costs that would be incurred due to acquisition schedule delays and asset design changes associated with such award.

(d) Number of Extensions.—A contract may be extended under this section more than once.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, §899(b)(1)(E), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2334, §579; renumbered §1107 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§108(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4208, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2304 of this title, referred to in subsec. (a), was repealed by Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §§1801(d), 1881(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4151, 4293, effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law. Subsecs. (a) to (l) of section 2304 were transferred to various provisions in chapter 221 of this title, with the same effective date and conditions, by Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1811(c)(2)–(5), (d)(2)–(9), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4165–4170.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §108(b), renumbered section 579 of this title as this section.

Subsecs. (a), (c)(1). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 1105(a)(2)" for "section 564(a)(2)".

1 See References in Text note below.
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

38.0 38.5 39.0 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
| **RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details 1) (USD $)** | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| Management Fees Paid                               | $ 311,638      | $ 0            | $ 311,638 | $ 0 |
| Series One [Member]                                |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Two [Member]                                |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Three [Member]                              |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 311,638        | 0              | 311,638 | 0 |
| Series Four [Member]                               |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Five [Member]                               |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Six [Member]                                |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | $ 0            | $ 0            | $ 0 | $ 0 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of management fees paid during the period.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**bctc_ManagementFeesPaid**Namespace Prefix:**bctc_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
#### § 201.3 Applicability of regulations in this part.

The regulations in this part, when governing or affecting contracts, shall apply to any poultry growing arrangement, swine production contract, or any other livestock or poultry contract entered into, amended, altered, modified, renewed or extended after February 7, 2012.

[76 FR 76889, Dec. 9, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 6430, Feb. 5, 2015]
EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
S.Y. Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                                          For the Three Months
                                          --------------------
                                             Ended March 31
                                          1998            1997
                                        ------          ------

BASIC

Average shares outstanding             3,288,972      3,273,017
                                       =========      =========
      Net income                      $1,897,000     $1,483,000
                                       =========      =========
      Per share                       $      .58     $      .45
                                       =========      =========

DILUTED

Average shares outstanding             3,288,972      3,273,017

Effect of assumed conversion
of stock options under treasury
stock method                             118,225        110,751
                                       ---------      ---------
                                       3,407,197      3,383,768
                                       =========      =========
      Net income                      $1,897,000     $1,483,000
                                       =========      =========
      Per share                       $      .56     $      .44
                                       =========      =========
# C_2010209EN.01002302.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/23

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Volker Schneider v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation)

(Case C-238/10)

()

2010/C 209/31

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Volker Schneider

Applicant:

Defendant: Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation)

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (1) to be interpreted as applying to a termination of activities as a result of a declaration that the employer is insolvent or a judicial decision ordering the dissolution and winding-up, on grounds of insolvency, of the credit institution which is the employer on the basis of Article 61(l)(a) and (b) of the amended Law of 5 April 1993 relating to the financial sector, in respect of which termination the national legislation provides for the termination of employment contracts with immediate effect? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (1) to be interpreted as applying to a termination of activities as a result of a declaration that the employer is insolvent or a judicial decision ordering the dissolution and winding-up, on grounds of insolvency, of the credit institution which is the employer on the basis of Article 61(l)(a) and (b) of the amended Law of 5 April 1993 relating to the financial sector, in respect of which termination the national legislation provides for the termination of employment contracts with immediate effect?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, are Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Directive 98/59/EC to be interpreted as meaning that the administrator or liquidator is to be deemed to be in the same position as an employer who is contemplating collective redundancies and who is capable of carrying out, to that end, the acts referred to in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 98/53/EC and of effecting such redundancies (judgment in Case C-323/08, paragraphs 39, 40 and 41)? (2) |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, are Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Directive 98/59/EC to be interpreted as meaning that the administrator or liquidator is to be deemed to be in the same position as an employer who is contemplating collective redundancies and who is capable of carrying out, to that end, the acts referred to in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 98/53/EC and of effecting such redundancies (judgment in Case C-323/08, paragraphs 39, 40 and 41)? (2)

2

---

(1)  OJ 1998 L 225, p. 16.

1

(2)  Judgment of 10 December 2009 in Case C-323/08 Rodríguez Mayor and Others

2

Rodríguez Mayor and Others

---
### §392. Depositaries of Government funds as confined to banks in Federal reserve system; member banks as depositaries

No public funds of the postal savings, or any Government funds, shall be deposited in the continental United States in any bank not belonging to the system established by this chapter: Provided, however, That nothing in this chapter shall be construed to deny the right of the Secretary of the Treasury to use member banks as depositaries.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §15 (par.), 38 Stat. 265; Proc. No. 2695, eff. July 4, 1946, 11 F.R. 7517, 60 Stat. 1352.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251, known as the Federal Reserve Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 226 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Words "of the Philippine Islands, or" after "No public funds" were deleted on authority of 1946 Proc. No. 2695, which granted independence to the Philippine Islands pursuant to section 1394 of Title 22. Proc. No. 2695 is set out as a note under section 1394 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

Section is comprised of second par. of section 15 of act Dec. 23, 1913. Par. 1 of section 15 and par. 3 of section 15, as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title IV, §406, 42 Stat. 1480, are classified to sections 391 and 393, respectively, of this title.
§ 81.19 How does the Bureau proceed after receiving a request for a Secretarial election? ( a ) Upon receiving a request for a Secretarial election, the Local Bureau Official will forward the request to the Authorizing Official with any appropriate background information.
( b ) The Authorizing Official will issue a memorandum to the Local Bureau official. The memorandum will do all of the following: ( 1 ) Direct the Local Bureau Official to call and conduct a Secretarial election by one of the following deadlines: ( i ) If the tribal request is to amend an existing governing document, within 90 days from the date of receipt of the request;
( ii ) If the tribal request is to adopt a new governing document (including an amendment to a governing document in the nature of an entire substitute) or to revoke an existing governing document, within 180 days after receiving the request.
( 2 ) Include as an attachment the document or proposed language to be voted upon;
( 3 ) Include as an attachment the Certificate of Results of Election with instructions to return it after the Secretarial election. The Certificate shall read as follows: Certificate of Results of Election Under a Secretarial election authorized by (name and title of authorizing official) on (date), the attached [insert: Governing document and Bylaws, charter of incorporation, amendment or revocation] of the (official name of tribe) was submitted to the registered voters of the tribe and on (date) duly (insert: adopted, ratified, rejected or revoked) by a vote of (number) for and (number) against and (number) cast ballots found spoiled in an election in which at least 30 percent (or such “percentages” as may be required to amend according the governing document) of the (number) registered voters cast their ballot in accordance with (appropriate Federal statute). Signed: (by the Chair of the Secretarial Election Board and Board Members) Date: ________; and
( 4 ) Advise that no changes or modifications can be made to any attached document, without the Authorizing Official's prior approval.
( c ) The Local Bureau Official will appoint a Bureau employee to serve as the Chair of the Secretarial Election Board and notify the tribe of the need to appoint at least two tribal members, who are at least 18 years of age, to the Secretarial Election Board. If the election is to be held as the result of a petition, then the Local Bureau Official will appoint a Bureau employee to serve as the Chair of the Secretarial Election Board and notify the tribe and the spokesperson for the petitioners of the need to appoint one tribal member each, who is at least 18 years of age, to the Secretarial Election Board. If the tribe or spokesperson for the petitioners declines or fails for any reason to make the appointment(s) by close of business on the 10th day after the date the notice letter is issued, the Chair of the Secretarial Election Board must appoint the representative(s), who are tribal members, if available, on the 11th day after the notice letter is issued.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00417

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.N.H

. , a Child

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017EM500829

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

REVERSED, and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent

with this opi nion. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellee.

SIGNED February 5, 2020.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
### **CHAPTER 106—POOL AND SPA SAFETY**

Sec.
8001.
Findings.
8002.
Definitions.
8003.
Federal swimming pool and spa drain cover standard.
8004.
Swimming pool safety grant program.
8005.
Minimum State law requirements.
8006.
Education and awareness program.
8007.
CPSC report.
8008.
Applicability.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 13.1


                              GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.

              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Emilio Azcarraga Jean, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Grupo Televisa, S.A. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
     December 31, 2003, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the
     "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  June 30, 2004

                    By:  /s/ EMILIO AZCARRAGA JEAN
                         ----------------------------
                         Name:  Emilio Azcarraga Jean
                         Title: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Grants to Help Repair Housing in Rural Communities 

 WASHINGTON, May 24, 2019 – Acting Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Joel Baxley today 

announced that USDA is seeking applications for grants to make housing repairs for low- and very-low-income 

rural residents. The grants are being provided through USDA’s Housing Preservation Grant program.

 Eligible applicants include town or county governments, public agencies, federally recognized Indian tribes, 

and nonprofit and faith-based organizations. USDA does not provide funding directly to homeowners under this 

program. For additional eligibility information, see page 24076 of the May 24, 2019, Federal Register.

 Applications are due by 5:00 p.m. local time on July 8, 2019, at the Rural Development state office where the 

project will be located. For a list of offices, visit the state office website.

 USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve life in 

rural America. 

 Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities 

build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, partnerships and 

innovation. Key strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life 

 To leverage investments in rural property, USDA Rural Development also encourages projects located in rural 

Opportunity Zones where projects should provide measurable results in helping communities build robust and 

sustainable economies. An Opportunity Zone is an economically-distressed community where new investments, 

under certain conditions, may be eligible for preferential tax treatment. Localities qualify as Opportunity Zones 

if they have been nominated for that designation by the state and that nomination has been certified by the 

Secretary of the U.S. Treasury. 

#
# C_2011160EN.01002201.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Air France v OHMI (Parallelogram shape)

(Case T-159/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark representing the shape of a parallelogram - Absolute ground of refusal - Absence of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 160/34

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Air France (Roissy-en-France, France) (represented by: A. Grolée, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 January 2010 (Case R 1018/2009-2) concerning an application for registration of a sign representing a parallelogram as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Air France to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Air France to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
Executive Compensation Summary



 Exhibit 10.30 
 NAPSTER, INC. 
 SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR 
 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 Base Salaries. Following
are the current annual base salary rates for the executive officers of Napster, Inc. (the “Company”) who will appear in the Summary Compensation Table included in the Company’s proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for the Company’s 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and who are currently employed by the Company (the “Named Executive Officers”): 
  

						
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	 Title
	  	Annual
Base Salary
	Wm. Christopher Gorog	  	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer	  	$	625,000
	Bradford D. Duea	  	President	  	$	300,000
	Suzanne M. Colvin	  	Vice President, Finance and Interim Chief Financial Officer	  	$	300,000
	Christopher Allen	  	Chief Operating Officer	  	$	315,000

 Bonuses. None of the Named Executive Officers are entitled to a pre-set fixed minimum or formulaic annual
bonus. Instead, any annual bonuses for the Named Executive Officers are determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. 
 Additional Compensation. The Named Executive Officers are also entitled to participate in various Company plans, and are subject to other written agreements, in each case as set forth in exhibits to the
Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Named Executive Officers may be eligible to receive perquisites and other personal benefits as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statements filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Company’s annual meetings of stockholders.