Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules 1563 

the EASA AD refers to ‘‘since entry into 

service,’’ this AD specifies the date of 

issuance of the original airworthiness 

certificate or the date of issuance of the 

original export certificate of airworthiness. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(g) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Todd Thompson, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify your 

principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or 

principal avionics inspector (PAI), as 

appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, 

your local Flight Standards District Office. 

The AMOC approval letter must specifically 

reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2009– 

0014, dated January 21, 2009; and BAE 

SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Inspection 

Service Bulletin ISB.57–072, Revision 1, 

dated September 25, 2008; for related 

information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 

6, 2010. 

Stephen P. Boyd, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–381 Filed 1–11–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–1250; Directorate 

Identifier 2008–NM–169–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; BAE 

Systems (Operations) Limited Model 

BAe 146–100A, –200A, and –300A 

Series Airplanes, and Model Avro 146– 

RJ70A, 146–RJ85A, and 146–RJ100A 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above that would 

supersede an existing AD. This 

proposed AD results from mandatory 

continuing airworthiness information 

(MCAI) originated by an aviation 

authority of another country to identify 

and correct an unsafe condition on an 

aviation product. The MCAI describes 

the unsafe condition as: In 1991, the UK 

Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) issued 

AD 015–08–91 [which corresponds to 

FAA AD 93–01–11], requiring the 

accomplishment of inspections of, and 

in case of crack findings, corrective 

actions on, the wing top skin at rib ‘0’ 

of pre-modification HCM00851C BAe 

146 series aircraft in accordance with 

British Aerospace Service Bulletin (SB) 

57–41 dated 26 July 1991. Recently, 

BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has 

determined that a revised inspection 

programme for the wing top skin and 

joint strap at rib ‘0’ on all BAe 146 and 

AVRO 146–RJ aircraft is necessary to 

assure the continued structural integrity 

of this area. Cracking of the wing centre 

section top skin, if undetected, could 

lead to structural failure and consequent 

loss of the aircraft. 

The proposed AD would require 

actions that are intended to address the 

unsafe condition described in the MCAI. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by February 26, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact BAE Systems 

Regional Aircraft, 13850 McLearen 

Road, Herndon, Virginia 20171; 

telephone 703–736–1080; e-mail 

raebusiness@baesystems.com; Internet 

http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/ 

RegionalAircraft/index.htm. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221 

or 425–227–1152. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2009–1250; Directorate Identifier 

2008–NM–169–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We have lengthened the 30-day 

comment period for proposed ADs that 

address MCAI originated by aviation 

authorities of other countries to provide 

adequate time for interested parties to 

submit comments. The comment period 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS

1564 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

for these proposed ADs is now typically 

45 days, which is consistent with the 

comment period for domestic transport 

ADs. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On January 8, 1993, we issued AD 93– 

01–11, Amendment 39–8465 (58 FR 

6081, January 26, 1993). That AD 

required actions intended to address an 

unsafe condition on the products listed 

above. 

Since we issued AD 93–01–11, the 

European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 

for the Member States of the European 

Community, has issued EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2008–0168, 

dated September 2, 2008 (referred to 

after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an 

unsafe condition for the specified 

products. The MCAI states: 

In 1991, the UK Civil Aviation Authority 

(CAA) issued AD 015–08–91 [which 

corresponds to FAA AD 93–01–11], requiring 

the accomplishment of inspections of, and in 

case of crack findings, corrective actions on, 

the wing top skin at rib ‘0’ of premodification HCM00851C BAe 146 series 

aircraft in accordance with British Aerospace 

Service Bulletin (SB) 57–41 dated 26 July 

1991. Recently, BAE Systems (Operations) 

Ltd has determined that a revised inspection 

programme for the wing top skin and joint 

strap at rib ‘0’ on all BAe 146 and AVRO 

146–RJ aircraft is necessary to assure the 

continued structural integrity of this area. 

Cracking of the wing centre section top skin, 

if undetected, could lead to structural failure 

and consequent loss of the aircraft. 

For the reasons described above, this new 

EASA [European Aviation Safety Agency] AD 

supersedes UK CAA AD 015–08–91 and 

requires repetitive high-frequency eddy 

current (HFEC), radiographic, ultrasonic, and 

detailed visual inspections [for cracking and 

corrosion] of the wing top skin and joint 

strap at rib ‘0’, the reporting of all inspection 

results to BAE Systems and, in case of 

findings, the accomplishment of corrective 

actions. 

The corrective actions include repairing 

cracking and corrosion, and contacting 

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited for 

repair instructions and doing the repair. 

You may obtain further information by 

examining the MCAI in the AD docket. 

Relevant Service Information 

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited 

has issued Inspection Service Bulletin 

ISB.57–070, dated October 15, 2007. 

The actions described in this service 

information are intended to correct the 

unsafe condition identified in the 

MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have proposed 

different actions in this AD from those 

in the MCAI in order to follow FAA 

policies. Any such differences are 

highlighted in a note within the 

proposed AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

Based on the service information, we 

estimate that this proposed AD would 

affect about 1 product of U.S. registry. 

The actions that are required by AD 

93–01–11 and retained in this proposed 

AD take about 4 work-hours per 

product, at an average labor rate of $80 

per work hour. Based on these figures, 

the estimated cost of the currently 

required actions is $320 per product. 

We estimate that it would take about 

4 work-hours per product to comply 

with the new basic requirements of this 

proposed AD. The average labor rate is 

$80 per work-hour. Based on these 

figures, we estimate the cost of the 

proposed AD on U.S. operators to be 

$320. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Amendment 39–8465 (58 FR 

6081, January 26, 1993) and adding the 

following new AD: 

BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited: Docket 

No. FAA–2009–1250; Directorate 

Identifier 2008–NM–169–AD. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules 1565 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by February 

26, 2010. 

Affected ADs 

(b) The AD supersedes AD 93–01–11, 

Amendment 39–8465. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to all BAE Systems 

(Operations) Limited Model BAe 146–100A, 

–200A, and –300A series airplanes, and 

Model Avro 146–RJ70A, 146–RJ85A, and 

146–RJ100A airplanes; certificated in any 

category. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 57: Wings. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

In 1991, the UK Civil Aviation Authority 

(CAA) issued AD 015–08–91 [which 

corresponds to FAA AD 93–01–11], requiring 

the accomplishment of inspections of, and in 

case of crack findings, corrective actions on, 

the wing top skin at rib ‘0’ of premodification HCM00851C BAe 146 series 

aircraft in accordance with British Aerospace 

Service Bulletin (SB) 57–41 dated 26 July 

1991. Recently, BAE Systems (Operations) 

Ltd has determined that a revised inspection 

programme for the wing top skin and joint 

strap at rib ‘0’ on all BAe 146 and AVRO 

146–RJ aircraft is necessary to assure the 

continued structural integrity of this area. 

Cracking of the wing centre section top skin, 

if undetected, could lead to structural failure 

and consequent loss of the aircraft. 

For the reasons described above, this new 

EASA [European Aviation Safety Agency] AD 

supersedes UK CAA AD 015–08–91 and 

requires repetitive high-frequency eddy 

current (HFEC), radiographic, ultrasonic, and 

detailed visual inspections [for cracking and 

corrosion] of the wing top skin and joint 

strap at rib ‘0’, the reporting of all inspection 

results to BAE Systems and, in case of 

findings, the accomplishment of corrective 

actions. 

The corrective actions include repairing 

cracking and corrosion, and contacting BAE 

Systems (Operations) Limited for repair 

instructions and doing the repair. 

Restatement of Requirements of AD 93–01– 

11, With No Changes 

(f) Unless already done, for Model BAe 

146–100A, –200A, and –300A series 

airplanes: Prior to the accumulation of 24,000 

landings, or within 60 days after March 2, 

1993 (the effective date of AD 93–01–11), 

whichever occurs later: Perform an x-ray 

inspection to detect fatigue cracks in the left 

and right wing upper skins, joint straps, and 

stringers in the vicinity of rib ‘‘0,’’ in 

accordance with British Aerospace 

Inspection Service Bulletin 57–41, dated July 

26, 1991. Doing the inspection required by 

paragraph (g)(1) of this AD terminates the 

inspection required by this paragraph. 

(1) If cracks are found, prior to further 

flight, repair in accordance with a method 

approved by the Manager, Standardization 

Branch, ANM–113, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, or the Manager, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA. As of the effective 

date of this AD, repair in accordance with a 

method approved by the Manager, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA. Thereafter, repeat 

the inspection required by paragraph (f) of 

this AD at intervals not to exceed 9,000 

landings, in accordance with British 

Aerospace Inspection Service Bulletin 57–41, 

dated July 26, 1991, until the initial 

inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of 

this AD is accomplished. 

(2) If no cracks are found, repeat the 

inspection required by paragraph (f) of this 

AD at intervals not to exceed 9,000 landings, 

in accordance with British Aerospace 

Inspection Service Bulletin 57–41, dated July 

26, 1991, until the initial inspection required 

by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD is 

accomplished. 

New Requirements of This AD 

(g) Unless already done, do the following 

actions. 

Note 1: The instructions of BAE Systems 

(Operations) Limited Inspection Service 

Bulletin ISB.57–070, dated October 15, 2007, 

which is the subject of this AD, are divided 

into two parts; consequently, the statement in 

paragraph 1.C. of BAE Systems (Operations) 

Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57– 

070, dated October 15, 2007, that there are 

three parts is incorrect and can be 

disregarded. 

(1) At the applicable compliance time 

specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii) of 

this AD: Do an HFEC inspection of the front 

and rear spar flanges, a detailed visual 

inspection of the stringers, and a detailed 

visual inspection of the stringer crown 

fittings, all at the rib ‘‘0’’ joint strap, for 

cracking and corrosion, and do all applicable 

corrective actions, in accordance with ‘‘Part 

1’’ of paragraph 2.C., ‘‘Inspection,’’ of BAE 

Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection 

Service Bulletin ISB.57–070, dated October 

15, 2007. Repeat the inspections thereafter at 

intervals not to exceed 4,000 flight cycles. Do 

all applicable corrective actions before 

further flight. Accomplishment of these 

initial inspections terminates the inspections 

required by paragraphs (f), (f)(1), and (f)(2) of 

this AD. 

(i) For airplanes on which an inspection 

was not done in accordance with 

Supplemental Structural Inspection (SSI) 57– 

10–101 (MPD 571001–DVI–10000–1) as of 

the effective date of this AD: Prior to the 

accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or 

within 4,000 flight cycles after the effective 

date of this AD, whichever occurs later. 

(ii) For airplanes on which an inspection 

was done in accordance with SSI 57–10–101 

(MPD 571001–DVI–10000–1) as of the 

effective date of this AD: Within 3,000 flight 

cycles after the effective date of this AD. 

(2) At the applicable compliance time 

specified in paragraph (g)(2)(i) or (g)(2)(ii) of 

this AD: Do detailed visual and HFEC 

inspections to detect cracking and corrosion 

of the rib ‘‘0’’ strap, a radiographic inspection 

of the rib ‘‘0’’ joint, and an ultrasonic 

inspection of the skin at the rib ‘‘0’’ joint 

strap, and do all applicable corrective 

actions, in accordance with ‘‘PART 2’’ of 

paragraph 2.C. ‘‘Inspection’’ of BAE Systems 

(Operations) Limited Inspection Service 

Bulletin ISB.57–070, dated October 15, 2007. 

Do all applicable corrective actions before 

further flight. Repeat the inspections 

thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,000 

flight cycles. 

(i) For airplanes on which an inspection 

was not done in accordance with SSI 57–10– 

102 and 57–10–102A (MPD 571002–SDI– 

10000–1 and 571002–SDI–10000–2) as of the 

effective date of this AD: Before the 

accumulation of 24,000 total flight cycles, or 

within 4,000 flight cycles after the effective 

date of this AD, whichever occurs later. 

(ii) For airplanes on which an inspection 

was done in accordance with SSI 57–10–102 

or 57–10–102A (MPD 571002–SDI–10000–1 

or 571002–SDI–10000–2) as of the effective 

date of this AD: Within 3,000 flights cycles 

after the effective date of this AD. 

(3) Submit a report of the findings (both 

positive and negative) of the initial 

inspections required by paragraphs (g)(1) and 

(g)(2) of this AD to BAE Systems (Operations) 

Limited, at the applicable time specified in 

paragraph (g)(3)(i) or (g)(3)(ii) of this AD. The 

report must include the inspection results, a 

description of any discrepancies found, the 

airplane serial number, and the number of 

landings and flight hours on the airplane. 

Send reports to Customer Liaison, Customer 

Support (Building 37), BAE SYSTEMS 

(Operations) Limited, Prestwick International 

Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland; fax 

+44 (0) 1292 675432; e-mail 

raengliaison@baesystems.com. 

(i) If the inspection was done on or after 

the effective date of this AD: Submit the 

report within 30 days after the inspection. 

(ii) If the inspection was done before the 

effective date of this AD: Submit the report 

within 30 days after the effective date of this 

AD. 

(4) Accomplishment of any repair does not 

constitute terminating action for the 

inspection requirements of this AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(h) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve 

AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send 

information to ATTN: Todd Thompson, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify your 

principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or 

principal avionics inspector (PAI), as 

appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, 

your local Flight Standards District Office. 

The AMOC approval letter must specifically 

reference this AD. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS

1566 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(i) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness 

Directive 2008–0168, dated September 2, 

2008; British Aerospace Inspection Service 

Bulletin 57–41, dated July 26, 1991; and BAE 

Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection 

Service Bulletin ISB.57–070, dated October 

15, 2007; for related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

December 30, 2009. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–382 Filed 1–11–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS 

ADMINISTRATION 

Information Security Oversight Office 

32 CFR Part 2004 

[NARA–09–0005] 

RIN 3095–AB34 

National Industrial Security Program 

Directive No. 1 

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight 

Office, NARA. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects the 

heading to a proposed rule published in 

the Federal Register of November 30, 

2009, regarding the National Industrial 

Security Program Directive No. 1. This 

correction assigns a Federal Docket 

Management System (FDMS) number to 

the proposed rule for Information 

Security Oversight Office (ISOO) 

regulations and provides a new 

regulation identifier number (RIN). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laura McCarthy, 301–837–3023. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

proposed rule FR Doc. E9–28517, 

beginning on page 62531 in the issue of 

November 30, 2009, make the following 

corrections in the heading of the 

document. 

Correction 

On page 62531, correct the docket 

number to read ‘‘[ISOO–09–0001]’’and 

correct the RIN to read ‘‘3095–AB63’’. 

Dated: January 5, 2010. 

Laura J. McCarthy, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 2010–394 Filed 1–11–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7515–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 50 and 58 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0172; FRL–9102–3] 

RIN 2060–AP98 

Public Hearings for Reconsideration of 

the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards for Ozone 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Announcement of public 

hearings. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is announcing three 

public hearings to be held for the 

proposed rule, ‘‘Reconsideration of the 

2008 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards for Ozone,’’ which was signed 

on January 6, 2010, and will be 

published in an upcoming Federal 

Register. The hearings will be held 

concurrently in Arlington, Virginia, and 

Houston, Texas, on Tuesday, February 

2, 2010, and in Sacramento, California, 

on Thursday, February 4, 2010. 

In the proposed rule, EPA proposes to 

set different primary and secondary 

standards than those set in 2008 to 

provide requisite protection of public 

health and welfare, respectively. 

DATES: The public hearings will be held 

on February 2, 2010, and February 4, 

2010. 

Please refer to SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION for additional information 

on the public hearings. 

ADDRESSES: The hearings will be held at 

the following locations: 

Arlington: Tuesday, February 2, 2010. 

Hyatt Regency Crystal City @ Reagan 

National Airport, Washington Room 

(located on the Ballroom Level), 2799 

Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, 

Virginia 22202. Telephone: 703–418– 

1234. 

Houston: Tuesday, February 2, 2010. 

Hilton Houston Hobby Airport, Moody 

Ballroom (located on the ground floor), 

8181 Airport Boulevard, Houston, Texas 

77061. Telephone: 713–645–3000. 

Sacramento: Thursday, February 4, 

2010. Four Points by Sheraton 

Sacramento International Airport, 

Natomas Ballroom, 4900 Duckhorn 

Drive, Sacramento, California 95834. 

Telephone: 916–263–9000. 

Written comments on this proposed 

rule may also be submitted to EPA 

electronically, by mail, by facsimile, or 

through hand delivery/courier. Please 

refer to the notice of proposed 

rulemaking to be published in an 

upcoming Federal Register and also 

available now at the following Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ 

standards/ozone/s_o3_cr_fr.html for the 

addresses and detailed instructions for 

submitting written comments. 

A complete set of documents related 

to the proposal is available for public 

inspection at the EPA Docket Center, 

located at 1301 Constitution Avenue, 

NW., Room 3334, Washington, DC 

between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. A reasonable fee may be 

charged for copying. Documents are also 

available through the electronic docket 

system at http://www.regulations.gov. 

The EPA Web site for the rulemaking, 

which includes the proposal and 

information about the public hearings, 

can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ 

naaqs/standards/ozone/s_o3_cr_fr.html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you would like to speak at the public 

hearings or have questions concerning 

the public hearings, please contact Ms. 

Tricia Crabtree at the address given 

below under SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

Questions concerning the 

‘‘Reconsideration of the 2008 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards for 

Ozone’’ proposed rule should be 

addressed to Ms. Susan Lyon Stone, 

U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards, Health and 

Environmental Impacts Division, (C504– 

06), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, 

telephone: (919) 541–1146, e-mail: 

stone.susan@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

proposal for which EPA is holding the 

public hearings will be published in an 

upcoming Federal Register. The public 

hearings will provide interested parties 

the opportunity to present data, views, 

or arguments concerning the proposed 

rules. The EPA may ask clarifying 

questions during the oral presentations, 

but will not respond to the 

presentations at that time. Written 

statements and supporting information 

submitted during the comment period 

will be considered with the same weight 

as any oral comments and supporting 

information presented at the public 

hearings. Written comments must be 

postmarked by the last day of the 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS