alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 

collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 

0572-XXXX. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average of 15 minutes per response, including the time 

for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 

collection of information. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture 

Rural Utilities Service

INTERIM FINANCING ADDENDUM 

If this project is financed in part by the Rural Telephone Bank, an agency of the United States of 

America, the references in the contract documents to "the United States of America and the 

Government" shall mean the "Rural Telephone Bank", as well, and the references to the 

"Administrator" shall mean the "Governor" of the Rural Telephone Bank as well. If the project 

is financed wholly by the Rural Telephone Bank, the reference to "the United States of America" 

and the "Government" shall mean the Rural Telephone Bank and the references to the 

"Administrator" shall mean the "Governor" of the Rural Telephone Bank. References to RUS 

loans or loan contracts shall include RUS guarantees of loans by others. 

The Owner, notwithstanding the references in the contract documents to the RUS or Rural 

Telephone Bank financing of the work herein provided for, plans to use funds other than RUS or 

Rural Telephone Bank loan funds initially and expects to be reimbursed subsequently with RUS 

or Rural Telephone Bank loan funds in whole or in part. It is understood that: 

1. An RUS , RTB , or FFB loan has , has not been made and 

 has not been released. (Owner checks applicable boxes.) 

2. Arrangements have been made for other funds so that invoices may be paid promptly 

in accordance with the contract provisions. 

3. Approval of the contract by RUS or the Rural Telephone Bank shall not be construed 

as a commitment to make a loan for this purpose. 

Date 

OWNER’S NAME 

BY 

PRESIDENT 

Date 

CONTRACTOR’S NAME 

BY 

TITLE 

RUS Form 375 (01-03)
# C_2006331EN.01001202.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 November 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-293/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/271/EEC - Pollution and nuisance - Urban waste-water treatment - Province of Varese)

(2006/C 331/20)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and D. Recchia, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italy (represented by: I. M. Braguglia, Agent, M. Fiorilli, avoccato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Article 5(2) of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40) — Insufficiently stringent treatment of urban waste-water from the agglomeration of several communes of the Province of Varese situated in the basin of the River Olona

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take measures to ensure that, as from 31 December 1998, urban waste-water from the agglomeration of several communes of the Province of Varese situated in the basin of the River Olona is subject to more stringent treatment than the secondary treatment or equivalent treatment provided for in Article 4 of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(2) and (5) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take measures to ensure that, as from 31 December 1998, urban waste-water from the agglomeration of several communes of the Province of Varese situated in the basin of the River Olona is subject to more stringent treatment than the secondary treatment or equivalent treatment provided for in Article 4 of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(2) and (5) of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 229, 17.9.2005.

1

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 60343 Summary Calendar

JOSE DOLORES HERNANDEZ

- ARGUIJO ,
Petitioner

v.
LORETTA LYNCH , U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A089 229 511

Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Jose Dolores Hernandez

- Arguijo , a citizen of Honduras, petitions for
review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) , dismissing his challenge of a decision of the I mmigration Judge (IJ) , who deni ed his application for withholding of removal . Hernandez’ application was based on persecution on account of his religion and membersh ip in a particular social

group . Where, as here, the BIA’s decision adopts or is affected by the IJ’s

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 13, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-60343 Document: 00513041665 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/13/2015N o. 14

- 60343

reasoning, the decision s of the IJ and BIA are reviewed

. E.g., Wang v. Holder , 569 F.3d 531, 536 (5th Cir. 2009). Whether an alien demonstrated eligibility for withholding of removal is a factual determination reviewed for substantial
evi dence. E.g., Orell an a
- Monson v. Holder , 685 F.3d 511, 517

- 18 (5th Cir. 2012)

. To be entitled to withholding of removal , an applicant must establish a clear probability of persecution on account of one of five protected ground s , either by showing that persecution upon removal is more likely than not to

occur or by establishing past persecution, the reby creating a presumption that future persecution is more likely than not to occur

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A)

. Persecution generally requires a showing that “harm or suffering will be inflicted upon” the applicant. Roy v. Ashcroft , 389 F.3d 132,
138 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation and quotation marks omitted ).
Aside from receiving three threats over a three

- year period, H ernandez
does not allege he suffered physical harm or that harm is more likely than not

to occur upon his return

. While threats of violence, along with evidence of intent to carry out the threats , may be sufficient to constitute persecution, e.g., Tamara

- Gomez v. Gonzales , 447 F.3d 343, 34 8

- 4 9 & n.8 (5th Cir. 2006),
Hernandez continued working as a youth coordinator without incident f or more than three years , his wife and children continue living in Honduras without incident, and there is no indication the threats will be, or are intended to be,
carried out. Because a reasonable fact finder would not be compelled to find
that Hernandez would more likely than not face persecution upon removal , the BIA’s decision that he is not entitled to withholding of removal is supported by
substantial evidence

. DENIED.

2 Case: 14-60343 Document: 00513041665 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/13/2015
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1418

AMENDMENT
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

November 17, 1999.

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 1418) entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the holding of court at Natchez,

Mississippi, in the same manner as court is held at Vicksburg, Mississippi, and for other purposes’’, do pass with the

following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 SECTION 1. HOLDING OF COURT AT NATCHEZ, MISSISSIPPI.

2 Section 104(b)(3) of title 28, United States Code, is

3 amended in the second sentence by striking all beginning

4 with the colon through ‘‘United States’’.

5 SEC. 2. HOLDING OF COURT AT WHEATON, ILLINOIS.

6 Section 93(a)(1) of title 28, United States Code, is

7 amended by adding after Chicago ‘‘and Wheaton’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 354.110 Disposition of fees for inspection made under cooperative agreement.

Fees for inspection under a cooperative agreement with any State or person shall be disposed of in accordance with the terms of such agreement. Such portion of the fees collected under a cooperative agreement as may be due the United States shall be remitted to the Service.
-  LINC Training Library                  -  Guaranteed Underwriting System (GUS) 
              -  Lender Approval 
              -  Single Family Housing GLP Policy Desk 
              -  Lender Training 
              -  Loan Closing 
              -  Loan Origination 
              -  Loan Servicing 
              -  GUS Lender Test Environment (LTE) 
              -  SFHGLP System Access and Security Guide 
              -  *New* Lender Training Schedule 

                  - English
                  - Spanish

USDA’s Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program (SFHGLP) provides lenders an opportunity to offer 100% financing with no down payment to qualifying rural homebuyers. USDA offers a loan note guarantee that protects against loss up to 90% of the original principal loan amount. This allows for loans to be made that may not otherwise be eligible for financing, and opens the door for lenders to assist more loan applicants in rural areas. USDA does not underwrite the loans and relies on lenders to make sound underwriting decisions. Lenders must also have a proven ability to originate, underwrite, service, and hold SFH mortgage loans. Therefore, the Agency must approve a lender to ensure that required standards are met and loans will be made responsibly.

To be eligible, the lender must currently be approved to participate in an acceptable secondary market organization or other Federal government agency. Chapter 3 of HB-1-3555 Technical Handbook (located under the “Loan Origination” tab of this library) contains important information including the Lender Approval Checklist, Compliance Reviews, Lender Recertification/Revocation, and more.

A brief training module on the lender approval process is accessible below, as is the Attachment 3A checklist for submitting your Lender Approval request, and how to become an approved lender.

If you still have any questions, please contact the Servicing Division at: sfhglpservicing@usda.gov
Exhibit 32.1

                    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection  with this Annual Report of Frontline Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John Fredriksen,  the Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: June 30, 2004

/s/ John Fredriksen
-------------------
Principal Executive Officer
#### § 83.45 When will the final determination be effective?

The final determination will become immediately effective. Within 10 business days of the decision, the Assistant Secretary will submit to the Federal Register a notice of the final determination to be published in the Federal Register.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1324 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1324

 To expand the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
            include the Wills House, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 1999

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
            include the Wills House, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GETTYSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK BOUNDARY REVISION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to revise 
the boundary of the Gettysburg National Military Park in the 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and for other purposes'' approved August 
17, 1990 (16 U.S.C. 430g-4) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Additional Land.--In addition to the land identified in 
subsection (a), the park shall also include the property commonly known 
as the Wills House located in the Borough of Gettysburg and identified 
as Tract P02-1 on the map entitled `Gettysburg National Military Park' 
numbered MARO 305/80,011 Segment 2, and dated April 1981, revised May 
14, 1999.''; and
            (3) in subsection (c) (as redesignated by paragraph (1)), 
        by striking ``map referred to in subsection (a)'' and inserting 
        ``maps referred to in subsections (a) and (b)''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF LAND.

    Section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to revise the boundary of 
the Gettysburg National Military Park in the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania, and for other purposes'' approved August 17, 1990 (16 
U.S.C. 430g-4) is amended by striking ``1(b)'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``1(c)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 354.30 Who may obtain inspection service.

An application for inspection service may be made by any interested person, including, but not being limited to, the United States, any State, county, municipality, or common carrier, and any authorized agent of the foregoing.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*James M. Stanley, Defendant-Appellant.

.(No. 73-325;

Second District (2nd Division)

January 21, 1975.

Erwin Cohn, of Cohn & Flynn, of Chicago, for appellant.

Jack Hoogasian, State’s Attorney, of Waukegan (James W. Jerz and Charles D. Sheehy, of Illinois State’s Attorneys Association, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE RECHENMACHER.
### §1144. Revocation of an order of confirmation

On request of a party in interest at any time before 180 days after the date of the entry of the order of confirmation, and after notice and a hearing, the court may revoke such order if and only if such order was procured by fraud. An order under this section revoking an order of confirmation shall—

(1) contain such provisions as are necessary to protect any entity acquiring rights in good faith reliance on the order of confirmation; and

(2) revoke the discharge of the debtor.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2639; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §515, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 387.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

If an order of confirmation was procured by fraud, then the court may revoke the order on request of a party in interest if the request is made before 180 days after the date of the entry of the order of confirmation. The order revoking the order of confirmation must revoke the discharge of the debtor, and contain such provisions as are necessary to protect any entity acquiring rights in good faith reliance on the order of confirmation.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–353 inserted "if and only" after "revoke such order".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
**EXHIBIT
4**
 
 
 
 **CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
  We
hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated May 17, 2005, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of FirstService Corporation (the "Company") as
at March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the consolidated statements of earnings,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each year in the three-year period ended
March 31, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for
the year ended March 31, 2005.
 
 
 *PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP*
 Chartered
Accountants
 
 Toronto,
Canada
 May 17,
2005
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the 
Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: February 22, 2011.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    FDIC Ref. No.              Bank name                 City                 State              Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10343................  Charter Oak Bank........  Napa...............  CA                    2/18/2011.
10344................  Citizens Bank of          Springfield........  GA                    2/18/2011.
                        Effingham.
10345................  Habersham Bank..........  Clarkesville.......  GA                    2/18/2011.
10346................  San Luis Trust Bank, FSB  San Luis Obispo....  CA                    2/18/2011.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2011-5396 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1182

To authorize the use of flat grave markers to extend the useful life of

the Santa Fe National Cemetery, New Mexico, and to allow more veterans the honor and choice of being buried in the cemetery.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. DOMENICI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To authorize the use of flat grave markers to extend the

useful life of the Santa Fe National Cemetery, New

Mexico, and to allow more veterans the honor and choice

of being buried in the cemetery.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO USE FLAT GRAVE MARKERS AT

4 SANTA FE NATIONAL CEMETERY, NEW MEX5 ICO.

6 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find7 ings:
2

•S 1182 IS

1 (1) The men and women who have served in the

2 Armed Forces have made immeasurable sacrifices

3 for the principles of freedom and liberty that make

4 this Nation unique in all civilization.

5 (2) The service of veterans has been vital to the

6 history of the Nation, and the sacrifices made by

7 veterans and their families should not be forgotten.

8 (3) These veterans at the very least deserve

9 every opportunity to be buried in a National Ceme10 tery of their choosing.

11 (4) The Santa Fe National Cemetery in New

12 Mexico opened in 1868 and was designated a Na13 tional Cemetery in April 1875.

14 (5) The Santa Fe National Cemetery now has

15 77 acres with almost 27,000 graves most of which

16 are marked by upright headstones.

17 (6) The Santa Fe National Cemetery will run

18 out of space to provide for casketed burials at the

19 end of 2000 unless Congress acts to allow the use

20 of flat grave markers to extend the useful life of the

21 cemetery until 2008.

22 (b) AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding section

23 2404(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code, the Secretary
3

•S 1182 IS

1 of Veterans Affairs may provide for flat grave markers

2 at the Santa Fe National Cemetery, New Mexico.

Æ
### SUBCHAPTER II—OCTANE DISCLOSURE