alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 381.151 Adulteration of product by polluted water; procedure for handling. ( a ) In the event there is polluted water (including but not limited to flood water) in an official establishment, all poultry products and ingredients for use in the preparation of such products that have been rendered adulterated by the water shall be condemned.
( b ) After the polluted water has receded from an official establishment, all walls, ceilings, posts, and floors of the rooms and compartments involved, including the equipment therein, shall, under the supervision of an inspector, be cleaned thoroughly by the official establishment personnel. An adequate supply of hot water under pressure is essential to make such cleaning effective. After cleaning a solution of sodium hypochlorite containing approximately one-half of 1 percent available chlorine (5,000 p/m) or other equivalent disinfectant approved by the Administrator[1] shall be applied to the surface of the rooms and equipment and rinsed with potable water before use.
( c ) Hermetically sealed containers of poultry product which have been contaminated by polluted water shall be examined promptly by the official establishment under supervision of an inspector and rehandled as follows: ( 1 ) Separate and condemn all poultry products in damaged or extensively rusted containers.
( 2 ) Remove paper labels and wash the remaining containers in warm soapy water, using a brush where necessary to remove rust or other foreign material. Disinfect these containers by either of the following methods: ( i ) Immerse in a solution of sodium hypochlorite containing not less than 100 p/m of available chlorine or other equivalent disinfectant approved by the Administrator,1 rinse in potable water, and dry thoroughly; or
( ii ) Immerse in 212 °F. water, bring temperature of the water back to 212 °F. and maintain the temperature at 212 °F. for 5 minutes, then remove containers from water and cool them to 95 °F. and dry thoroughly.
( 3 ) After handling as described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the containers may be relacquered, if necessary, and then relabeled with approved labels applicable to the product therein.
( 4 ) The identity of the canned poultry product shall be maintained throughout all stages of the rehandling operations, to insure correct labeling of containers.
[38 FR 34456, Dec. 14, 1973] Footnotes -
381.151
[1] A list of approved disinfectants is available upon request to Scientific Services, Meat and Poultry Inspection Program, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Ray Lee Stewart, Defendant-Appellant.

(Nos. 74-176, 7, 8, 9 cons.;

Second District (2nd Division)

December 16, 1974.

*913Ralph Ruebner, of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Elgin, for appellant.

Philip G. Reinhard, State’s Attorney, of Rockford, for the People.

PER CURIAM.
# C_2007096EN.01002202.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/22

---

Order of the Court of 9 March 2007 — Schneider Electric SA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-188/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Concentrations between undertakings - Electricity distribution market - Decisions to initiate and close proceedings)

(2007/C 96/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Schneider Electric SA (represented by: A. Winckler, I. Girgenson and M. Pittie, avocats)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Bouquet and O. Beynet, as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 31 January 2006 in Case T-48/03 Schneider Electric SA v Commission, rejecting as inadmissible an application for annulment of the Commission's Decision of 4 December 2002 to initiate a detailed examination of the concentration between Schneider and Legrand (Case COMP/M.2283 — Schneider/Legrand II) and of the Commission's Decision of 13 December 2002 to close the proceedings examining the concentration.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Schneider Electric SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Schneider Electric SA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

1

---
#### § 202.121 Rule 21: Intervention.

At any time after docketing of a proceeding and before commencement of a hearing, oral or written, therein, the presiding officer may, upon petition, and for good cause shown, permit any person to intervene therein. The petition shall state with preciseness and particularity: (a) The petitioner's relationship to the matters involved in the proceeding; (b) the nature of the material the petitioner intends to present in evidence; (c) the nature of the argument the petitioner intends to make; and (d) the reasons why the petitioner should be allowed to intervene. Any such petition, and notice of the order thereon, shall be served on the parties and made a part of the record in the proceeding.
# C_2007117EN.01001702.xml

| 26.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 19 March 2007 — Theologos-Grigorios Khatzithanasis v Ipourgos Igias kai Kinonikis Allilengiis and Organismos Epangelmatikis Ekpaidefsis kai Katartisis (Ο.Ε.Ε.Κ.)

(Case C-151/07)

(2007/C 117/28)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Theologos-Grigorios Khatzithanasis

Applicant:

Defendants: Ipourgos Igias kai Kinonikis Allilengiis (Minister for Health and Social Solidarity) and Organismos Epangelmatikis Ekpaidefsis kai Katartisis (Ο.Ε.Ε.Κ.) (Organisation for Professional Education and Training)

Defendants:

Question referred

When a national of a Member State, relying upon evidence of a qualification which, according to him, falls within the field of application of Council Directive 92/51/EEC of 18 June 1992 on a second general system for the recognition of professional education and training to supplement Directive 89/48/EEC (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 25), requests the competent authorities of the host Member State to allow him access to a profession regulated in the host Member State or to allow him to pursue that profession, is it open to those authorities — under Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Directive 92/51, interpreted in the light of Articles 149 and 150 of the Treaty establishing the European Community — to reject his application (and thus to exclude entirely access by him to that profession or pursuit thereof in the host Member State) solely on the ground that, while the qualification in question was awarded by an authority of the Member State from which he comes, that followed studies the greater part of which were carried out in the host Member State, at a body which operates freely in that State but, pursuant to the relevant general provision in its legislation, is not recognised as an educational establishment there?

---
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002**
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CUSTODIAN
 
 In connection
with the Quarterly Report of *Family
Healthcare Solutions, Inc.* , a ***Nevada*** corporation (the "Company"), on **10-QSB** for
the quarter ended **Decembr 31** **,
2004** as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Teodoro
F. Franco L. ,
certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350),
that to my knowledge:
 
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and\
 
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.
 
 
 Dated:
February 14, 2005
 
 /s/Teodoro F. Franco L.
 Teodoro
F. Franco L.
 Sole
Officer/Director
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 The Board
of Directors and Stockholders
 of Clarus
Corporation:
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-42600, 333-42604, 333-127686 and 333-79565) of Clarus
Corporation of our reports dated March 3, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Clarus Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the related financial statement
schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual
report on Form 10-K of Clarus Corporation.
 
 Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of
Financial Accounting Standards Board  No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payments, as of January 1, 2006.
 
 /s/ KPMG LLPStamford,
      ConnecticutMarch 3,
      2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0010

CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THERESE ANNE ELKINTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 20, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 16 2021

08/16/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Board of Visitors of the Marine Corps University (BOV MCU) will meet to review, develop and provide recommendations on all aspects of the academic and administrative policies of the University; examine all aspects of professional military education operations; and provide such oversight and advice, as is necessary, to facilitate high educational standards and cost effective operations. The Board will be focusing primarily on the internal procedures of Marine Corps University. All sessions of the meeting will be open to the public.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Friday, April 8, 2011, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Marine Corps University President's Conference Room (Hooper Room). The address is: 2076 South Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joel Westa, Director of Academic Support, Marine Corps University Board of Visitors, 2076 South Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134, telephone number 703-784-4037.

      ( print page 12717)    
Dated: March 1, 2011.

D. J. Werner,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-5169 Filed 3-7-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.36 What requirements are imposed upon Indian tribes or tribal organizations by this subpart?

When carrying out self-determination contracts, Indian tribes and tribal organizations shall develop, implement, and maintain systems that meet these minimum standards, unless one or more of the standards have been waived, in whole or in part, under section 107(e) of the Act and subpart K.
### §2219d. Encouragement of conservation practices

At the time a System institution or an agricultural mortgage loan originator (as defined in section 2279aa of this title) approves a loan made to a borrower that, in the opinion of the institution or originator, would be ineligible for a loan made, insured, or guaranteed under the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1921 et seq.) by reason of subtitle B or C of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3811 et seq.), the institution or originator, as the case may be, shall encourage the borrower to contact the Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service to obtain information about soil conservation methods and practices.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.39, formerly §4.38, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §428, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1658; renumbered §4.39, Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §413, Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1004; amended Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(27), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4682.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, referred to in text, is title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, which is classified principally to chapter 50 (§1921 et seq.) of Title 7, Agriculture. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of Title 7 and Tables.

The Food Security Act of 1985, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 99–198, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1354. Subtitles B and C of title XII of the Food Security Act are classified generally to subchapters II (§3811 et seq.) and III (§3821 et seq.), respectively, of chapter 58 of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1985 Amendment note set out under section 1281 of Title 7 and Tables.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "section 2279aa of this title)" for "section 2279aa(7) of this title)".
#### § 354.248 Scope and applicability of rules of practice.

The rules of practice of the Department of Agriculture in subpart H of part I, subtitle A, title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, are the rules of practice applicable to adjudicatory, administrative proceedings under the regulations in this part (9 CFR part 354).

[43 FR 11148, Mar. 17, 1978]
# C_2007130EN.01001601.xml

| 12.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/16

---

Call for proposals under the work programme of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

(2007/C 130/11)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the call for proposals under the work programmes of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call in the Cooperation Specific Programme: Information and Communication Technologies: FP7-ICT-2007-2.

Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website:

http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
#### § 312.9 Official detention marks and devices.

The official mark for articles and livestock detained under part 329 of this subchapter shall be the designation “U.S. Detained” and the official device for applying such mark shall be the official “U.S. Detained” tag (FSIS Form 8400-2) as prescribed in § 329.2 of this subchapter.

[55 FR 47842, Nov. 16, 1990]
CENRAP BART MODELING GUIDELINES 

 12 km Terrain Field (m) 6 km CALMET Wind Field 

 

 Three CALMET Modeling Domains 

Prepared by 

T. W. Tesche 

Dennis E. McNally 

George J. Schewe 

Alpine Geophysics, LLC 

Ft. Wright, KY 41017 

 Prepared for 

Ms. Annette Sharp 

Executive Director 

Central Region Air Planning Assoc. 

10005 S. Pennsylvania, Ste C 

Oklahoma City, OK 73159

15 December 2005 

www.alpinegeophysics.com
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Hersha Hospitality Trust (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ashish R. Parikh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








May 10, 2010
/s/ Ashish R. ParikhAshish R. ParikhChief Financial Officer
### §5806. Preemption

This chapter, and regulations promulgated under this chapter, shall supersede any provision of any State or local law, statute, rule, regulation, or standard—

(1) relating to the selection or use of a benchmark replacement or related conforming changes; or

(2) expressly limiting the manner of calculating interest, including the compounding of interest, as that provision applies to the selection or use of a Board-selected benchmark replacement or benchmark replacement conforming changes.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. U, §107, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 832.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this division", meaning div. U of Pub. L. 117–103, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 825, known as the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of div. U to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5801 of this title and Tables.
USDA is an equal opportunity employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Announces Opening Date for Rural e-Connectivity Pilot Program Applications 

WASHINGTON, March 29, 2019 – Acting Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Joel Baxley today 

announced that USDA Rural Development will begin accepting the first round of applications for the Rural eConnectivity Pilot Program (ReConnect Program) on April 23, 2019, through reconnect.usda.gov.

In March 2018, Congress provided $600 million to USDA to expand broadband infrastructure and services in 

rural America. On December 13, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue announced the rules of the program, 

called “ReConnect,” including how the loans and grants will be awarded to help build broadband infrastructure 

in rural America.

USDA is making available up to $200 million in grants, $200 million in loan and grant combinations, and 

$200 million in low-interest loans. The application deadlines are:

• May 31, 2019, for grants;

• June 21, 2019, for loan/grant combinations; and

• July 12, 2019, for low-interest loans.

Applicants can request technical assistance from USDA by filling out the contact form at 

https://www.usda.gov/reconnect/contact-us.

Telecommunications companies, rural electric cooperatives and utilities, internet service providers and 

municipalities may apply for funding through USDA’s ReConnect Program to connect rural areas that currently 

have insufficient broadband service. Funds will be awarded to projects that have financially sustainable 

business models that will bring high-speed broadband to rural homes, businesses, farms, ranches and 

community facilities such as first responders, health care sites and schools.

The ReConnect Program enables USDA to create and implement innovative solutions to rural connectivity 

by providing various financial options to our partners and customers. For additional information, see page 5981 

of the Feb. 25, 2019, Federal Register and page 64315 of the Dec. 14, 2018, Federal Register or visit 

reconnect.usda.gov.

#
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Help Farmers and Ranchers Venture into New and 

Better Markets

WASHINGTON, Jan. 17, 2024 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced that USDA is 

accepting applications for grants to help agricultural producers maximize the value of their products and venture 

into new and better markets.

USDA is making the grants available under the Value-Added Producer Grants program. The grants help farmers 

and ranchers generate new products, create marketing opportunities, and increase their incomes through valueadded activities.

Eligible applicants include independent producers, agricultural producer groups, farmer or rancher cooperatives, 

and majority-controlled producer-based business ventures.

USDA may award up to $75,000 for planning activities or up to $250,000 for working capital expenses related 

to producing and marketing a value-added agricultural product.

Planning activities may include conducting feasibility studies and developing business plans. Working capital 

expenses may include costs associated with processing, marketing, advertising, inventory and salaries.

USDA is particularly interested in applications that will advance Biden-Harris Administration priorities to: 

• Reduce climate pollution and increase resilience to the impacts of climate change through economic 

support to rural communities. 

• Ensure all rural residents have equitable access to Rural Development (RD) programs and benefits from 

RD-funded projects; and 

• Help rural communities recover economically through more and better market opportunities and through 

improved infrastructure.

Paper applications must be postmarked and delivered by mail, email or in person to the state office where the 

project is proposed by close of business on April 16, 2024. Electronic applications will be accepted via 

Grants.gov until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 11, 2024.

Additional information is available on page 2919 of the Jan. 17 Federal Register or by contacting your local 

USDA Rural Development office.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ODOMETER REQUIREMENTS
#### § 557.19 Specimens for laboratory examination and similar purposes.

Importation of fish or fish product samples for trade show exhibition, laboratory examination, research, evaluative testing, trade show exhibition, or other scientific purposes are subject to the same conditions as imported meat or meat product specimens under § 327.19 of this chapter.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                Exhibit 23.1





                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Pharma Patch Public Limited Company

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-83478, 33-93606 and 333-02630) on Form S-8 of Pharma Patch Public Limited
Company of our report dated May 9, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance
sheet of Pharma Patch Public Limited Company and subsidiaries as of February 29,
1996, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and loss and deficit
and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the February 29,
1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of Pharma Patch Public
Limited Company.


KMPG Peat Marwick LLP


Short Hills, New Jersey
December 10, 1996