alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 354.220 Buildings. The buildings shall be of sound construction and kept in good repair, and shall be of such construction as to prevent the entrance or harboring of vermin. ( a ) *Outside openings.* ( 1 ) The doors, windows, skylights, and other outside openings of the plant, except receiving rooms and live rabbit holding rooms, shall be protected by properly fitted screens or other suitable devices against the entrance of flies and other insects.
( 2 ) Outside doors, except in receiving rooms and live rabbit holding rooms, shall be self-closing and so hung that not over 1 ⁄ 4-inch clearance remains when closed. Screen doors shall open toward the outside of the building.
§ 13.39 Appeal to Authority Head. ( a ) Any Defendant who has served a timely answer and who is determined in an Initial Decision to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment may appeal such decision to the Authority Head by filing a notice of appeal in accordance with this section and § 13.26.
( b ) ( 1 ) A notice of appeal may be filed at any time within 30 days after the ALJ issues an Initial Decision. However, if another party files a motion for reconsideration under § 13.38, consideration of the appeal will be stayed automatically pending resolution of the motion for reconsideration.
( 2 ) If a Defendant files a timely motion for reconsideration, a notice of appeal may be filed within 30 days after the ALJ denies the motion or issues a revised Initial Decision, whichever applies.
( 3 ) The Authority Head may extend the initial 30-day period for an additional 30 days if the Defendant files with the Authority Head a request for an extension within the initial 30-day period and shows good cause.
( c ) If the Defendant files a timely notice of appeal and the time for filing motions for reconsideration under § 13.38 has expired, the ALJ will forward two copies of the notice of appeal to the Authority Head, and will forward or Make available the record of the proceeding to the Authority Head.
( d ) A notice of appeal will be accompanied by a written brief specifying exceptions to the Initial Decision and reasons supporting the exceptions.
( e ) The Representative for the Government may file a brief in opposition to exceptions within 30 days of receiving the notice of appeal and accompanying brief.
( f ) There is no right to appear personally before the Authority Head.
( g ) There is no right to appeal any interlocutory ruling by the ALJ.
( h ) In reviewing the Initial Decision, the Authority Head will not consider any objection that was not raised before the ALJ unless a demonstration is Made of extraordinary circumstances causing the failure to raise the objection.
( i ) If any party demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Authority Head that additional evidence not presented at such hearing is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to present such evidence at such hearing, the Authority Head will remand the matter to the ALJ for consideration of such additional evidence.
( j ) The Authority Head may affirm, reduce, reverse, compromise, remand, or settle any penalty or assessment determined by the ALJ in any Initial Decision.
( k ) The Authority Head will promptly serve each party to the appeal with a copy of the decision of the Authority Head and with a Statement describing the right of any Person determined to be liable for a penalty or assessment to seek judicial review.
( l ) Unless a petition for review is filed as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3805 after a Defendant has exhausted all administrative remedies under this part and within 60 days after the date on which the Authority Head serves the Defendant with a copy of the Authority Head's decision, a determination that a Defendant is liable under § 13.3 is final and is not subject to judicial review.
§ 205.210 Effect of EFS outside State in which filed. ( a ) A question arises whether, if an EFS is filed in one State, a notice of it can be filed in another State and shown on the master list for the second State. There is nothing in the Section to prevent this, but it would serve no purpose.
( b ) The Section provides only for filing an EFS, covering a given product, in the system for the State in which it is produced or located. Upon such filing in such system, subsections (e)(2) and (g)(2)(C) make buyers, commission merchants and selling agents *not registered* with that system subject to the security interest in that product whether or not they know about it, *even if they are outside that State.* Subsections (e)(3) and (g)(2)(D) make persons *registered* with that system subject if they receive written notice of it *even if they are outside that State.* All of these provisions apply only where an EFS is filed in the system for the State in which the product is produced or located. They do not apply to a filing in another system.
( c ) What constitutes “receipt” of notice is determined by the law of the State in which the intended recipient of notice resides. This is based on subsection (f) which follows provisions for notice to buyers, and (g)(3) which follows provisions for notice to commission merchants and selling agents. Each of those provisions uses the word “buyer” but it means “intended recipient of notice.”
[51 FR 29451, Aug. 18, 1986, as amended at 71 FR 56343, Sept. 27, 2006]
# C_2010328EN.01001201.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/12

---

Action brought on 2 August 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-387/10)

()

2010/C 328/20

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and W. Mölls, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The European Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 EC and Article 36 of the EEA Agreement by adopting and retaining provisions under which only national financial institutions or national business trustees may be appointed as tax representatives of investment or real property investment funds; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 EC and Article 36 of the EEA Agreement by adopting and retaining provisions under which only national financial institutions or national business trustees may be appointed as tax representatives of investment or real property investment funds;

| — | order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission takes the view that provisions under which only national financial institutions or national business trustees may be appointed as tax representatives of investment or real property investment funds constitute an establishment requirement which restricts the freedom to provide services.

Contrary to the view taken by Austria, the disputed provisions are neither suitable for improving the quality of tax representation nor for protecting the interests of investors and the fiscal administration in proper compliance with tax obligations. It is thus not possible to discern a justification for the restriction on the freedom to provide services.

---
. / 

/ 

/ 

MIKE SIMPSON 

SECOH O asTRiCT, IDAHO 

WASHlMRTflM omCE : 

2312 RAvmiRN HOUSE OFRCG SUILDINQ 

WASHINCTON,DC2C515 

(202)225-6631 

FAX: t202) 229-6216 

DISTRICT QFRCE: 

802 WESTT BANMOCK STREET, SUITE 600 

BotsE, ID 83702 

12081 334-1953 

FAX; 1208) 334-9533 

•*f*m .hou M.gov/*! mpso n 

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

400 7* Street SW 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood; 

SUSCOUMITTEES: 

IHTIMOn, EmiMMMEfn . 

AMQ RtUtTf o ACENOia 

ENEROV AND WATcn OcvELapuewT 

COMMITTEE ON BUDGET 

C 3 

> 

o 

CO 

I am writing in support of an application submitted by the Idaho Falls, Idaho Regional Airport for grant 

funds under the Small Community Air Service Development Grant Program. On August 22, Idaho Falls 

lost service from Horizon Air, connecting passengers to Boise, Portland, Seattle, Spokane and Northern 

California. This discontinuance of service was a factor of Internal airline reconfiguration and not a lack 

of demand In the area. 

The \oca\ Idaho Fails business community, doing business mostly in the Northwest region, reJies on 

westbound service. Idaho Falls is home to the Department of Energy Idaho National Laboratory and 

managing companies. Idaho Falls is also a gateway community to the nearby Yellowstone and Grand 

Teton National Parks. Traveler use estimates show more than 400,000 for the Eastern Idaho Region and 

the nearest hub airport Is over a three hour drive. 

The City of Idaho Falls has Identified two or three air carriers that may be able to provide westbound 

service for the region. If successful in obtaining the requested grant funds, the City will be able to 

approach those airlines in revenue guarantees, cost reductions, introductory fares and extensive 

advertising to initiate the start up of new service to the region. 

As a resident of Idaho Falls I fully understand and appreciate the importance of westbound commercial 

Service to the business community and citizens of the region and I urge the Department of 

Transportation to give this proposal consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Mike Simpson 

Member of Congress
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

Commission file number 33-92146

American Southwest Financial Securities Corporation, Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1996-FHA1
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Arizona
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)

0742739
(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

2390 Camelback Road,  Suite 225,  Phoenix, Arizona
(Address of principal executive offices)

85016
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (212) 526-5594

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
           Yes [X]       No  [ ]

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A amends Item 14 of the original Form 10-K
which was filed on March 26, 2002.



      Item 14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on
		Form 8-K.

	(a)	Exhibits

		(99.1)	Annual Independent Accountant's Servicing Report

		(99.2)  Annual Statement of Compliance


	(b) 	Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last quarter of 2001 in
		order to provide statements for the monthly distributions to
		investors on September 27, 2001, October 25, 2001, November 27, 2001
 		and December 26, 2001.




				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LaSalle Bank National Association, in its
capacity as Trustee under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement on behalf of
American Southwest Financial Securities Corporation, Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1996-FHA1
(Registrant)


By:	/s/  	Cynthia Reis
	---------------------------
		Cynthia Reis
		First Vice President

Date:	May 29, 2002
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

| To any Fund: | c/o T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.100 East Pratt StreetBaltimore, Maryland 21202Attention:  Carmen DeyesuTelephone:  410-345-6658Telecopy:  410-685-8827/8830 |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| To the Custodian: | State Street Bank and Trust Company1776 Heritage DriveNorth Quincy, Massachusetts 02171, U.S.A.Attention: Carol C. AyotteTelephone:  617-985-6894Telecopy:  617-537-6321 |
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

| Signature attested to:                                                               | Executed on Behalf of each Fund:                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/Suzanne E. FraunhofferBy:      Name: Suzanne E. FraunhofferTitle: Legal Assistant | /s/Carmen DeyesuBy:  Name: Carmen Deyesu   Title: Treasurer for each           of the foregoing |

| Signature attested to:                                                   | State Street Bank and Trust Company                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/Glenn CiottiBy:      Name: Glenn CiottiTitle: VP & Assoc. Counsel | /s/Ronald E. LogueBy:  Name: Ronald E. Logue   Title: Executive Vice President |

----

| **Country**    | **Subcustodian**                   | **Central Depository**                                                                     |
|----------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| United Kingdom | State Street Bankand Trust Company | None;The Bank of EnglandThe Central GiltsOffice (CGO);The Central MoneymarketsOffice (CMO) |

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 113

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

#### § 113.452 Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae Antibody.

Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae Antibody is a specific antibody product containing antibodies directed against one or more somatic antigens of *Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae.* Each serial shall be tested as provided in this section. Any serial found unsatisfactory by a prescribed test shall not be released.

(a) Each serial shall meet the applicable general requirements provided in § 113.450.

(b) *Potency test.* Bulk or final container samples of completed product from each serial shall be tested using the two-stage test provided in this section.

(1) In the first stage, each of 40 Swiss mice, each weighing 16 to 20 grams, shall be injected subcutaneously with 0.1 ml of product (dried product shall be rehydrated according to label directions). Twenty-four hours postinjection, the injected mice and 10 additional mice designated controls shall be challenged subcutaneously with the same culture of *Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae.*

(2) If less than eight of the 10 controls die from erysipelas within 7 days post-challenge, the test is invalid. All dead mice shall be examined to determine if the cause of death was *Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae* infection.

(3) The mice injected with product shall be observed for 10 days postchallenge and all deaths recorded. The second stage shall be required when 7-10 of the mice injected with product die in the first stage. The second stage shall be conducted in a manner identical to the first stage.

(4) The results of the test shall be evaluated according to the following table:

| Stage | Number of vaccinates | Cumulative number of vaccinates | Cumulative total number of deaths for a satisfactory test | Cumulative total number of deaths for an unsatisfactory test |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 40 | 40 | 6 or less | 11 or more. |
| 2 | 40 | 80 | 12 or less | 13 or more. |

[39 FR 16859, May 10, 1974. Redesignated at 39 FR 25463, July 11, 1974, as amended at 40 FR 20067, May 8, 1975; 40 FR 23989, June 4, 1975. Redesignated at 55 FR 35561, Aug. 31, 1990; 61 FR 51776, Oct. 4, 1996; 64 FR 43045, Aug. 9, 1999]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 76 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 24, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 438) to promote and enhance public safety through use of 911 as the 
universal emergency assistance number, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of 
the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII are waived. General 
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Commerce. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Commerce 
now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill 
for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time 
during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a 
recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time 
for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic 
vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic 
voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in 
the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2007113EN.01000201.xml

| 23.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 May 2007

(2007/C 113/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3454 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4532 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68175 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1920 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6561 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,92 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1325 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5832 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,186 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,84 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7806 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2735 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,697 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7755 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6363 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4579 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5264 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8462 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0632 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 251,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4415 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2986 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3165 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 676,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5569 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,720 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,8500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,127 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3454

JPY

Japanese yen

163,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4532

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68175

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1920

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6561

ISK

Iceland króna

83,92

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1325

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5832

CZK

Czech koruna

28,186

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,84

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7806

RON

Romanian leu

3,2735

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,697

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7755

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6363

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4579

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5264

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8462

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0632

KRW

South Korean won

1 251,69

ZAR

South African rand

9,4415

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2986

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3165

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 676,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5569

PHP

Philippine peso

61,720

RUB

Russian rouble

34,8500

THB

Thai baht

44,127

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 201.82 Care and promptness in weighing and handling livestock and live poultry. ( a ) Each stockyard owner, market agency, dealer, packer, swine contractor and live poultry dealer must exercise reasonable care and promptness with respect to loading, transporting, holding, yarding, feeding, watering, weighing, or otherwise handling livestock, or live poultry to prevent waste of feed, shrinkage, injury, death or other avoidable loss.
( b ) Whenever live poultry is obtained under a poultry growing arrangement and the weight of the live poultry is a factor in calculating payment to the grower, the poultry must be transported promptly after loading. The process of obtaining the gross weight must commence immediately upon arrival at the processing plant, holding yard, or other scale normally used for such purpose. The process of obtaining the gross weight which may include, but is not limited to, fueling, uncoupling the trailer, changing the road tractor to a yard tractor or weighing the trailer only, must be conducted without delay; *specifically,* the time period between arrival and completion of the process of obtaining the gross weight must not exceed thirty (30) minutes.
( c ) Live poultry dealers must not place poultry from multiple growers on a single live poultry transport trailer or other live poultry transport equipment, creating what is commonly referred to as a “split load.”
[78 FR 51664, Aug. 21, 2013]