alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 122—TRAVEL AND TOURISM**

Sec.
9801.
Defined term.
9802.
Purposes.
9803.
Responsibilities of the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Travel and Tourism.
9804.
Travel and tourism strategy.
9805.
Data on domestic travel and tourism.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.65 What programmatic reports and data shall the Indian tribe or tribal organization provide?

Unless required by statute, there are no mandatory reporting requirements. Each Indian tribe or tribal organization shall negotiate with the Secretary the type and frequency of program narrative and program data report(s) which respond to the needs of the contracting parties and that are appropriate for the purposes of the contract. The extent of available resources will be a consideration in the negotiations.
# Martin Family Achieves Homeownership on the St. Regis Mohawk Reservation Through Packaging Partnerships

Copied to clipboard

07.18.2023

Obligation Amount: 

Year(s) of Obligation: 
20202022

Congressional District: 

## Related Story

Browse All Stories →

### New Homes Dedicated at Zuni Pueblo New Mexico

[Read More]

08.06.2019

GrantsHomeownershipHousingTribal
Order filed October 24, 2017 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00781-CR

____________

AMBER ORLEAN WILLEMSEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 79307-CR

ORDER

Appellant appeals her conviction for intoxication manslaughter. Appellant 

filed a notice of appeal on September 28, 2017. The record was due October 2, 2017. 

Appellant filed a statement of inability to pay costs in the trial court on May 25, 

2017. No contest was filed to appellant’s statement. 
Accordingly, the official court reporter for the 149th District Court of 

Brazoria County is directed to file the reporter’s record within 30 days of the date 

of this order.

PER CURIAM
| **RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details 1) (USD $)** | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| Management Fees Paid                               | $ 0            | $ 0            | $ 0 | $ 0 |
| Series One [Member]                                |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Two [Member]                                |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Three [Member]                              |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Four [Member]                               |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Five [Member]                               |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Six [Member]                                |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | $ 0            | $ 0            | $ 0 | $ 0 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of management fees paid during the period.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**bctc_ManagementFeesPaid**Namespace Prefix:**bctc_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
##### 



Exhibit 10( j ) Regent Communications, Inc.
Schedule of Director Compensation Each non-management director of Regent Communications, Inc. currently receives an annual cash
retainer of $12,000, paid $1,000 per month for his service as director, as well as reimbursement
for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by him in connection with his duties as a director,
including attending meetings of the Board and any committees thereof. The chair of the Audit
Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an
additional annual cash retainer of $5,000, $2,500 and $2,500, respectively, for the additional
services required of the Committee chair. Directors that serve on a committee receive $1,000 for
each committee meeting that they attend, either in person or via telephone. Directors who are
employees of the Company receive no additional fees for serving as a director. In accordance with the Regent Communications, Inc. 2001 Directors Stock Option Plan, each
non-management director receives 5,000 stock options annually for his service as a director.
Newly elected directors receive a grant of 10,000 stock options at the first board meeting
following his election, per the provisions of the plan.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1294

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue

regulations to limit the number of pieces of carry-on baggage that a

passenger may bring on an airplane.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28, 1999

Mr. INOUYE (for himself, Mr. AKAKA, and Mr. HOLLINGS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue regulations to limit the number of pieces

of carry-on baggage that a passenger may bring on an

airplane.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CARRY-ON BAGGAGE.

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act:

5 (1) AIRPLANE.—The term ‘‘airplane’’ means an

6 airplane, as that term is used in section 121.589 of

7 title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.
2

•S 1294 IS

1 (2) CARRY-ON BAGGAGE.—The term ‘‘carry-on

2 baggage’’ does not include child safety seats or as3 sistive devices used by disabled passengers.

4 (3) CERTIFICATE HOLDER.—The term ‘‘certifi5 cate holder’’ means a certificate holder, as that term

6 is used in section 121.589 of title 14, Code of Fed7 eral Regulations.

8 (4) PASSENGER.—The term ‘‘passenger’’ in9 cludes any child under the age of 2 who boards an

10 airplane of a certificate holder, without regard to

11 whether a ticket for air transportation was pur12 chased for the child.

13 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 6 months after

14 the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of

15 the Federal Aviation Administration shall promulgate re16 vised regulations to modify the regulations contained in

17 section 121.589 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations,

18 to require that each certificate holder include in the certifi19 cate holder’s carry-on baggage program the following re20 quirements:

21 (1) Each passenger boarding an airplane of the

22 certificate holder shall be limited to a total of 2

23 pieces of carry-on baggage.
3

•S 1294 IS

1 (2) The sum of each dimension of the carry-on

2 baggage referred to in paragraph (1) shall not ex3 ceed 9 inches by 14 inches by 22 inches.

Æ
§ 5.34 Standards of conduct for administration of the Privacy Act. Each component will inform its employees of the provisions of the Privacy Act, including the Act's civil liability and criminal penalty provisions referenced in § 5.35. Unless otherwise permitted by law, the Department will: ( a ) Maintain only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the Component or the Department that is required to be accomplished by statute or by Executive order of the President;
( b ) Collect information about an individual directly from that individual whenever practicable and when the information may result in adverse determinations about an individual's rights, benefits, and privileges under federal programs;
( c ) Inform each individual from whom information is collected of: ( 1 ) The legal authority to collect the information and whether providing it is mandatory or voluntary;
( 2 ) The principal purpose for which the Department intends to use the information;
( 3 ) The routine uses the Department may make of the information; and
( 4 ) The effects on the individual, if any, of not providing the information;
( d ) Ensure that the component maintains no system of records without public notice and that it notifies appropriate Department officials of the existence or development of any system of records that is not the subject of a current or planned public notice;
( e ) Maintain all records that are used by the Department in making any determination about an individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to ensure fairness to the individual in the determination;
( f ) Except as to disclosures made to an agency or made under the FOIA, make reasonable efforts, prior to disseminating any record about an individual, to ensure that the record is accurate, relevant, timely, and complete;
( g ) Maintain no record describing how an individual exercises their First Amendment rights, unless it is expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained, or is pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity;
( h ) When required by the Act, maintain an accounting in the specified form of all disclosures of records by the Department to persons, organizations, or agencies;
( i ) Maintain and use records with care to prevent the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of a record to anyone; and
( j ) Disclose Privacy Act or JRA records only as permitted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(b).
# C_2012184EN.01000902.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Dow Chemical v Council

(Case T-158/10) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Expiry of anti-dumping measures - Review - Likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping - Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)

2012/C 184/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Dow Chemical Company (Midland, Michigan, United States) (represented: initially by J.-F. Bellis, R. Luff and V. Hahn, and subsequently by J.-F. Bellis and R. Luff, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, R. Szostak and B. Driessen, Agents, and by G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, barrister)

Defendant:

Intervening party in support of the defendant: European Commission, (represented: initially by H. van Vliet and M. França, and subsequently by M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)

Intervening party in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 of 19 January 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States of America (OJ 2010 L 17, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 of 19 January 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States of America in so far as it concerns The Dow Chemical Company; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 of 19 January 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States of America in so far as it concerns The Dow Chemical Company;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those of The Dow Chemical Company; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those of The Dow Chemical Company;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
H. Res. 295

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 23, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1875) to amend title 28, United States Code,

to allow the application of the principles of Federal diversity

jurisdiction to interstate class actions. The first reading of

the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for

the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the

Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. No amendment to the
2

•HRES 295 EH

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

in order except those printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule

XVIII and except pro forma amendments for the purpose of

debate. Each amendment so printed may be offered only by

the Member who caused it to be printed or his designee and

shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee

of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further

consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a

recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House

on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of

a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage
3

•HRES 295 EH

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2010234EN.01002301.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/23

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Republic of Poland), lodged on 4 June 2010 — Kopalnia Odkrywkowa Polski Trawertyn P. Granatowicz, M. Wąsiewicz (a partnership) v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu

(Case C-280/10)

()

2010/C 234/37

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Kopalnia Odkrywkowa Polski Trawertyn P. Granatowicz, M. Wąsiewicz (a partnership)

Appellant:

Respondent: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is an entity, in the persons of future partners, which effects investment expenditure before formal registration of the partnership as an entity governed by commercial law or registration for purposes of value added tax, entitled, following registration of the partnership as an entity governed by commercial law and registration for purposes of value added tax, to exercise, pursuant to Article 9 and Articles 168 and 169 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) the right to deduct input tax incurred in connection with investment expenditure which is used for taxable activities carried out within the framework of the partnership? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is an entity, in the persons of future partners, which effects investment expenditure before formal registration of the partnership as an entity governed by commercial law or registration for purposes of value added tax, entitled, following registration of the partnership as an entity governed by commercial law and registration for purposes of value added tax, to exercise, pursuant to Article 9 and Articles 168 and 169 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) the right to deduct input tax incurred in connection with investment expenditure which is used for taxable activities carried out within the framework of the partnership?

1

| 2. | Does an invoice documenting incurred investment expenditure which was issued to the partners, and not to the partnership, preclude exercise of the right to deduct input tax incurred in connection with investment expenditure as referred to in Question 1? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does an invoice documenting incurred investment expenditure which was issued to the partners, and not to the partnership, preclude exercise of the right to deduct input tax incurred in connection with investment expenditure as referred to in Question 1?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
-  Home 

## Contact Us

Hazardous Materials Information Center
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-4488****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922****Fax:**202-366-5713**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Safety Advisory Notice: Possible Catastrophic Failure of Nurse Tanks and Recommendation for Periodic Testing

Safety Advisory_AWT Nurse Tanks.pdf (83.32 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
OMB Control No. 0572-0149

Expiration Date: 31, 2022

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to 

a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this 

information collection is 0572-NEW. The time required to complete this information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining 

the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

RUS FORM 395a (Issued )

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION

(Including Installation)

PROJECT DESIGNATION

In connection with the above referenced RUS financed project, the undersigned certify to the best of their respective 

knowledge and belief that:

1. The installation of equipment provided for pursuant to Contract No. dated ,

including all approved amendments, (hereinafter called the ''Project'') between

(Buyer) and 

(Seller) has been completed as of and is in all respects in strict compliance 

with all the provisions of the Loan Contract, including specifications drawings, and all modifications thereof.

2. The Seller has delivered to the Buyer a Certificate of Seller certifying that all persons who have furnished labor in 

connection with the Project have been paid in full; that all manufacturers, materialmen and subcontractors which 

furnished any materials or services, or both, for the Project have been paid in full; that no lien has been filed against 

the Project and no person has any right to claim any lien against the Project.

3. All the required acceptance tests have been made on the equipment; results were satisfactory, and the Seller has 

furnished in writing to the Buyer the results of all tests.

4. All defects in workmanship and materials reported during the period of construction of the Project have been 

corrected.

5. The total cost of the Project as completed is

Dollars ( $ ) Including $__________ in taxes paid by the Seller and $____________ in 

taxes paid by the Buyer

Dated this day of 20 .

NAME OF BUYER NAME OF ENGINEER

By By BUYER’S SIGNATURE ENGINEER’S SIGNATURE
### §3903. Strengthened supervision of international lending

(a) Each appropriate Federal banking agency shall evaluate banking institution foreign country exposure and transfer risk for use in banking institution examination and supervision.

(b) Each such agency shall establish examination and supervisory procedures to assure that factors such as foreign country exposure and transfer risk are taken into account in evaluating the adequacy of the capital of banking institutions.

(Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IX, §904], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1279.)
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the registration statement (No. 333-63781) on Form S-8 ofMerrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated January 10, 2003,relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of MerrillMerchants Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001,and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders'equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report is included in theDecember 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Merrill Merchants Bancshares,Inc.

 

 

 

/s/ Berry Dunn McNeil &Parker

 

Bangor, Maine

March 24, 2003

 

 

----