alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1087

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma

to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for certain radiation-exposed veterans.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 20, 1999

Mr. HUTCHINSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchioloalveolar carcinoma to the list of diseases presumed to

be service-connected for certain radiation-exposed veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION THAT BRONCHIOLO-ALVEOLAR

4 CARCINOMA IS SERVICE-CONNECTED FOR

5 RADIATION-EXPOSED VETERANS.

6 Section 1112(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code,

7 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 paragraph:
2

•S 1087 IS

1 ‘‘(P) Bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-50010 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-149005 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 16, 2007 (March 14, 2008 as to Note 13), relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Exactech, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R Share-Based Payments
discussed in Note 2 and the retrospective adjustment of the 2006 and 2005 financial statements for a change in composition of reportable segments discussed in Note 13) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                     
|---------------------
|DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|Jacksonville, Florida
|March 14, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           1,146,080
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                  0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                    0
<EQUITIES>                                         8,336
<MORTGAGE>                                             0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                          0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 1,154,416
<CASH>                                             8,146
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                29,875
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           146,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,537,742
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                   72,079
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              511,196
<POLICY-OTHER>                                         0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                  0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   30,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          700
<COMMON>                                         695,441
<OTHER-SE>                                       105,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,537,742
<PREMIUMS>                                        90,448
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                               65,064
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 3,189
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       297
<BENEFITS>                                         6,874
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                       23,829
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                              18,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  109,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                      29,011
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               80,760
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      80,760
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       2.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       2.64
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                    50,227
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                5,300
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  1,574
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                     0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                  14,897
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                   42,204
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                                0
        


</TABLE>
§ 146.6 Specific provisions for participating slaughter plants. ( a ) Only commercial upland game bird, commercial waterfowl, meat-type chicken, and meat-type turkey slaughter plants that are under continuous inspection by the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the Department or under State inspection that the Food Safety and Inspection Service has recognized as equivalent to Federal inspection may participate in the Plan.
( b ) To participate in the Plan, meat-type chicken, meat-type turkey, and commercial upland game bird and commercial waterfowl slaughter plants must follow the relevant special provisions in §§ 146.33(a), 146.43(a), and 146.53(a), respectively, for sample collection and flock monitoring, unless they are exempted from the special provisions under §§ 146.32(b), 146.42(b), or 146.52(b), respectively.
[74 FR 14716, Apr. 1, 2009]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 21, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Open SystemC Initiative (“OSCI”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ST-Ericsson SA, Grenoble, FRANCE, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and OSCI intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On October 9, 2001, OSCI filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 3, 2002 (67 FR 350). The last notification was filed with the Department on October 14, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 16, 2010 (75 FR 70030).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-4916 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
# C_2010209EN.01001301.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach (Republic of Poland), lodged on 3 May 2010 — Logstor ROR Polska Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Katowicach

(Case C-212/10)

()

2010/C 209/20

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Logstor ROR Polska Sp. z o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Katowicach

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Did Article 4(2) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital, (1) as amended with effect from 17 June 1985 by Article 1(1) of Directive 85/303/EEC (2) of 10 June 1985, entitle a Member State to reintroduce, as from 1 January 2007, capital duty on a loan taken up by a capital company, if the creditor is entitled to a share in the profits of that company, in the case where the Member State had previously waived the charging of that duty as from the date of accession, that is to say, from 1 May 2004?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ, English Special Edition 1969 (II), p. 412.

1

(2)  Council Directive amending Directive 69/335/EEC concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ 1985 L 156, pp. 23-24).

2

---
# C_2010317EN.01001902.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 September 2010 — Finanzamt Lüdenscheid v Christel Schriever

(Case C-444/10)

()

2010/C 317/35

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt Lüdenscheid

Applicant:

Defendant: Christel Schriever

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is there a ‘transfer’ of a totality of assets within the meaning of Article 5(8) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment in the case where a trader transfers ownership of the stock and shop installations of his retail outlet to a purchaser and merely leases the premises which he owns to the purchaser? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is there a ‘transfer’ of a totality of assets within the meaning of Article 5(8) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment in the case where a trader transfers ownership of the stock and shop installations of his retail outlet to a purchaser and merely leases the premises which he owns to the purchaser?

1

| 2. | Is it relevant in that regard whether the premises were leased on the basis of a long-term lease contract for use or whether the lease contract is concluded for an indefinite period and may be terminated by either party at short notice? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it relevant in that regard whether the premises were leased on the basis of a long-term lease contract for use or whether the lease contract is concluded for an indefinite period and may be terminated by either party at short notice?

---

(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

1

---
### §5106. Annual performance report

Not later than the date on which the President submits to Congress a budget pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall make available on a public website and submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate an update on Coast Guard mission performance during the previous fiscal year.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXV, §3521(b)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2314, §2905; renumbered §5106, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §122(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4239.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 2905 of this title as this section.
### §2501. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

The Congress finds and declares that—

(1) the books and records of banking and financial organizations and business associations engaged in issuing and selling money orders and traveler's checks do not, as a matter of business practice, show the last known addresses of purchasers of such instruments;

(2) a substantial majority of such purchasers reside in the States where such instruments are purchased;

(3) the States wherein the purchasers of money orders and traveler's checks reside should, as a matter of equity among the several States, be entitled to the proceeds of such instruments in the event of abandonment;

(4) it is a burden on interstate commerce that the proceeds of such instruments are not being distributed to the States entitled thereto; and

(5) the cost of maintaining and retrieving addresses of purchasers of money orders and traveler's checks is an additional burden on interstate commerce since it has been determined that most purchasers reside in the State of purchase of such instruments.

(Pub. L. 93–495, title VI, §601, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1525.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Applicability to Sums Payable on Money Orders, Etc., Deemed Abandoned on or After February 1, 1965; Exception

Pub. L. 93–495, title VI, §604, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1526, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter] shall be applicable to sums payable on money orders, traveler's checks, and similar written instruments deemed abandoned on or after February 1, 1965, except to the extent that such sums have been paid over to a State prior to January 1, 1974."
§ 307.6 Basis of billing for overtime and holiday services. ( a ) Each recipient of overtime or holiday inspection service, or both, shall be billed as provided for in § 307.5(a) and at the rates specified in § 391.3, in increments of quarter hours. For billing purposes, 8 or more minutes shall be considered a full quarter hour. Billing will be for each quarter hour of service rendered by each Program employee.
( b ) Official establishments, importers, or exporters requesting and receiving the services of a Program employee after he has completed his day's assignment and left the premises, or called back to duty during any overtime or holiday period, shall be billed for a minimum of 2 hours overtime or holiday inspection service at the established rate.
( c ) Bills are payable upon receipt and become delinquent 30 days from the date of the bill. Overtime or holiday inspection will not be performed for anyone having a delinquent account.
[40 FR 45800, Oct. 3, 1975, as amended at 54 FR 6389, Feb. 10, 1989]
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  November 21, 2005 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                         
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------
|                         | Marc N. Teal,
Principal Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

NIGEL DEDIEECE CARTER,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

CHESTER COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 10 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of May , 2023, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief

is DENIED.
Support Documents for 

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on 

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) 

P-03-861 

EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0577 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 18
Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for 

PMN P-03-861 

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for 

PMN P-03-861 

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for 

PMN P-03-861 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 18
A-001 

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-03-861 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 18
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 18
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 18
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 18
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 18
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 18
A-002 

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-03-861 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 18
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 18
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 18
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 18
A-003 

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-03-861 

EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 18
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 18
### §82. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–320, title IV, §402, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1510

Section, R.S. §5202; Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §13 (par.), 38 Stat. 264; Sept. 7, 1916, ch. 461, 39 Stat. 753; Apr. 5, 1918, ch. 45, §20, 40 Stat. 512; Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 79, §2, 41 Stat. 297; Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title V, §504, 42 Stat. 1481; Feb. 25, 1927, ch. 191, §11, 44 Stat. 1231; Jan. 22, 1932, ch. 8, §5, formerly §6, 47 Stat. 8, renumbered and amended June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title I, §1, 61 Stat. 202; May 20, 1933, ch. 35, §2, 48 Stat. 73; June 19, 1934, ch. 653, §2, 48 Stat. 1107; Sept. 8, 1959, Pub. L. 86–230, §10, 73 Stat. 458; Sept. 9, 1959, Pub. L. 86–251, §2, 73 Stat. 488; July 24, 1970, Pub. L. 91–351, title II, §201(b), 84 Stat. 451; Jan. 4, 1975, Pub. L. 93–646, §11, 88 Stat. 2337, provided that no national banking association could at any time be indebted, or in any way liable, to an amount exceeding the amount of its capital stock at such time actually paid in and remaining undiminished by losses or otherwise, plus 50 percent of the amount of its unimpaired surplus fund, except on account of demands of the nature following: notes of circulation; moneys deposited with or collected by the association; bills of exchange or drafts drawn against money actually on deposit to the credit of the association, or due thereto; liabilities to the stockholders of the association for dividends and reserve profits; liabilities incurred under the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act; liabilities incurred under the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act [12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.]; liabilities created by the indorsement of accepted bills of exchange payable abroad actually owned by the indorsing bank and discounted at home or abroad; liabilities incurred under the provisions of sections 1031 to 1033 of this title; liabilities incurred on account of loans made with the express approval of the Comptroller of the Currency under former section 84(9) of this title; liabilities incurred under the provisions of section 352a of this title; liabilities incurred in connection with sales of mortgages, or participations therein, to the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; and liabilities incurred in borrowing from the Export-Import Bank of the United States.
IB

House Calendar No. 6

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 92

[Report No. 106–20]

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 251 North Main Street in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, as the

‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Additional sponsors: Mr. BURR of North Carolina and Mr. ETHERIDGE

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 251 North Main Street in WinstonSalem, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal

Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 92 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 251 North Main Street in Winston-Salem,

4 North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the

5 ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and United States

6 Courthouse’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

11 a reference to the ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and

12 United States Courthouse’’.

House Calendar No. 6

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 92

[Report No. 106–20]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United

States Courthouse’’.‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and UnitedStreet in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, as theStates courthouse located at 251 North Main

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed