alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Tommy Geater, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-52;

Second District

January 6, 1975.

Ralph Ruebner and Adam Lutynski, both of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Elgin, for appellant.

Jack Hoogasian, State’s Attorney, of Waukegan (James W. Jerz, of Model District State’s Attorneys Office, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE T. MORAN.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Atlantica
Inc. 10-Q financial and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,606
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     2,458
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,064)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          1,352,900
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,350,691
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.05



</TABLE>
#### § 310.19 Inspection of kidneys.

An employee of the establishment shall open the kidney capsule and expose the kidneys of all livestock at the time of slaughter for the purpose of examination by a Program employee.
### Revolving Fund
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 9, 2016

p1108

Order 

Clerk

November 9, 2016

153629

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153629

COA: 331318

Van Buren CC: 15-019892-FC

JUAN CARLOS BARRERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2016 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J. (concurring). For the reasons set forth in my concurring statement 

in People v Keefe, 498 Mich 962 (2015), I concur with the Court’s order as it pertains to 

the sentence imposed in this case.
# C_2007072EN.01002902.xml

| 29.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/29

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4571 — Swiss Life/Capitalleben)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 72/13)

On 19 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4571. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4571. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
§ 84.004 Are there types of contracts and agreements that do not require Secretarial approval under this part? Yes, the following types of contracts or agreements do not require Secretarial approval under this part: ( a ) Contracts or agreements otherwise reviewed and approved by the Secretary under this title or other federal law or regulation. See, for example, 25 CFR parts 152 (patents in fee, certificates or competency); 162 (non-mineral leases, leasehold mortgages); 163 (timber contracts); 166 (grazing permits); 169 (rights-of-way); 200 (coal leases); 211 (mineral leases); 216 (surface mining permits and leases); and 225 (mineral development agreements);
( b ) Leases of tribal land that are exempt from approval by the Secretary under 25 U.S.C. 415 or 25 U.S.C. 477;
( c ) Sublease and assignments of leases of tribal land that do not require approval by the Secretary under part 162 of this title;
( d ) Contracts or agreements that convey to tribal members any rights for temporary use of tribal lands, assigned by Indian tribes in accordance with tribal laws or custom;
( e ) Contracts or agreements that do not convey exclusive or nearly exclusive proprietary control over tribal lands for a period of seven years or more;
( f ) Contracts or agreements that are exempt from Secretarial approval under the terms of a corporate charter authorized by 25 U.S.C. 477;
( g ) Tribal attorney contracts, including those for the Five Civilized Tribes that are subject to our approval under 25 U.S.C. 82a;
( h ) Contracts or agreements entered into in connection with a contract under the Indian Self-Determination Act, 25 U.S.C. 450f, or a compact under the Tribal Self-Governance Act, 25 U.S.C. 458aa.
( i ) Contracts or agreements that are subject to approval by the National Indian Gaming Commission under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. 2701 *et seq.,* and the Commission's regulations; or
( j ) Contracts or agreements relating to the use of tribal lands for hydropower projects where the tribal lands meet the definition of a “reservation” under the Federal Power Act (FPA), provided that: ( 1 ) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a license or an exemption;
( 2 ) FERC has made the finding under section 4(e) of the FPA (16 U.S.C. 797(e)) that the license or exemption will not interfere or be inconsistent with the purpose for which such reservation was created or acquired; and
( 3 ) FERC license or exemption includes the Secretary's conditions for protection and utilization of the reservation under section 4(e) and payment of annual use charges to the tribe under section 10(e) of the FPA (16 U.S.C. 803(e)).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-74720, 33-80852, 333-09095 and 333-44667) pertaining to the
1989 Stock Plan, 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1994 Employee Stock Bonus
Plan, 1994 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and 1997 Equity Incentive
Plan of AXYS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of our report dated February 6, 1998 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of AXYS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
March 27, 1998
### §2710. Disposition of effects of decedents

All moneys, articles of value, papers, keepsakes, and other similar effects belonging to the deceased individuals in the Coast Guard, not claimed by their legal heirs or next of kin, shall be deposited in safe custody, and if any such moneys, articles of value, papers, keepsakes, or other similar effects so deposited have been, or shall hereafter be, unclaimed for a period of two years from the date of the death of such individual, such articles and effects shall be sold and the proceeds thereof, together with the moneys above mentioned, shall be deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts. The Secretary shall make diligent inquiry in every instance after the death of such individual to ascertain the whereabouts of his heirs or next of kin, and prescribe necessary regulations to carry out the foregoing provisions. Claims may be presented hereunder at any time within five years after such moneys or proceeds have been so deposited in the Treasury, and, when supported by competent proof in any case after such deposit in the Treasury, shall be certified to Congress for consideration.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 538, §507; renumbered §2710, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(23), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4749.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Derived from title 34, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §942 (Mar. 29, 1918, ch. 31, 40 Stat. 499).

Said section provided for the disposition of effects of deceased naval personnel. It is believed similar provisions should be made for Coast Guard personnel.

Said section would in no way be affected. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "individuals" for "persons" and substituted "individual" for "person" in two places.

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 507 of this title as this section.
STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                S.Y. Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                                      For the Three Months
                                         Ended March 31
                                        1997       1996

PRIMARY
Average shares outstanding         3,273,017    3,260,732
Effect of assumed conversion
  of stock options under
  treasury stock method              110,751       92,018
                                   ---------    ---------
                                   3,383,768    3,352,750
                                   =========    =========
Net income                        $1,483,000   $1,072,000
                                   =========    =========
Per share                         $      .44   $      .32
                                   =========    =========
FULLY DILUTED
Average shares outstanding         3,273,017    3,260,732
Effect of assumed conversion
  of stock options under
  treasury stock method              110,767      100,586
                                   ---------    ---------
                                   3,383,784    3,361,318
                                   =========    =========
Net income                        $1,483,000   $1,072,000
                                   =========    =========
Per share                         $      .44   $      .32
                                   =========    =========
### SUBCHAPTER I—REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §107(c)(1), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4207, inserted subchapter I designation and heading.
### §5369. Avoiding duplication

The Board of Governors shall take any action that the Board of Governors deems appropriate to avoid imposing requirements under this part that are duplicative of requirements applicable to bank holding companies and nonbank financial companies under other provisions of law.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title I, §169, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1434.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle C (§§161–176) of title I of Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1420, which is classified principally to this part. For complete classification of subtitle C to the Code, see Tables.
### §2204. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–552, title V, §508, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4132

Section, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.16, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 613, prohibited tax-exempt guarantees.
#### James Green and Others, Appellants, v. Charles F. W. Horn, Respondent.

Judgment and order'unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Exhibit 10.1 - Smelter Agreement.





Exhibit 10.1

 

 







 

 

-1-






 

 







 

 

-2-






 

 







 

 

-3-






 

 





 

 



 

-4-






 

 





 

 



 

-5-
# C_2011013EN.01002101.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/21

---

Action brought on 29 October 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-516/10)

()

2011/C 13/38

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and E. Montaguti, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by maintaining in force Paragraph 5 in conjunction with Paragraph 2(3) and (4) and Paragraph 6(2)(g) of the VGVG, the Republic of Austria has infringed Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by maintaining in force Paragraph 5 in conjunction with Paragraph 2(3) and (4) and Paragraph 6(2)(g) of the VGVG, the Republic of Austria has infringed Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU;

| — | Declare that, by maintaining in force Paragraph 6(2)(d) in conjunction with Paragraph 2(3) and (4) of the VGVG, the Republic of Austria has infringed Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by maintaining in force Paragraph 6(2)(d) in conjunction with Paragraph 2(3) and (4) of the VGVG, the Republic of Austria has infringed Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU;

| — | Order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission does not question the fact that Member States may restrict the purchase of plots of land on grounds of public interest. However, the provisions of the Vorarlberger Grundverkehrsgesetz (VGVG) cited in the forms of order sought constitute a disproportionate restriction on the free movement of capital and the right of establishment.

In particular, the so-called Interessentenregel (‘interested parties rule’), according to which the VGVG landowners take precedence in purchases of agricultural land over non-landowners, is disproportionate. The continued agricultural use of the land can, according to the defendant, thus be guaranteed if the potential purchaser is willing to lease the land on a long-term basis to the previous tenant.

Similarly, it is not apparent why the interested parties rule should also apply where the previous owner includes his plot of land as an asset in kind in an undertaking or a foundation, although the continued agricultural use of the land is ensured.

In the view of the Commission, it is also disproportionate that the abovementioned interested parties rule is repeatedly applied where the purchase is not completed for reasons unconnected with the vendor.

Finally, the Commission disputes that the VGVG does not provide for any kind of regulation which permits, in the case of a lack of interest from landowners in the exploitation of a plot of agricultural land, that land to be sold without an obligation on the purchaser to use it for agricultural purposes.

---
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1082

To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968 to provide assistance for unincorporated neighborhood watch

programs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 19, 1999

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control

and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to provide assistance for

unincorporated neighborhood watch programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ASSISTANCE FOR UNINCORPORATED NEIGH4 BORHOOD WATCH PROGRAMS.

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act maybe cited as the

6 ‘‘Neighborhood Watch Partnership Act of 1999’’.

7 (b) IN GENERAL.—Section 1701(d) of title I of the

8 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42

9 U.S.C. 3796dd(d)) is amended—
2

•S 1082 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the

2 end;

3 (2) in paragraph (11), by striking the period at

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

5 (3) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(12) provide assistance to unincorporated

7 neighborhood watch organizations approved by the

8 appropriate local police or sheriff’s department, in

9 an amount equal to not more than $1950 per orga10 nization, for the purchase of citizen band radios,

11 street signs, magnetic signs, flashlights, and other

12 equipment relating to neighborhood watch patrols.’’.

13 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

14 1001(a)(11) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and

15 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)(11)) is

16 amended—

17 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking clause (vi)

18 and inserting the following:

19 ‘‘(vi) $282,625,000 for fiscal year 2000.’’; and

20 (2) in subparagraph (B) by inserting after

21 ‘‘(B)’’ the following: ‘‘Of amounts made available to

22 carry out part Q in each fiscal year $14,625,000

23 shall be used to carry out section 1701(d)(12).’’.

Æ
# C_2012217EN.01003001.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/30

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2012 — Skareby v Commission

(Case F-42/10) (1)

1

(Civil service - Duty to provide assistance - Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment by a hierarchical superior)

2012/C 217/62

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant:
  Carina Skareby (Louvain, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Carina Skareby

Defendant:
  European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Defendant:

European Commission

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of the defendant’s decision refusing the request for assistance relating to psychological harassment of which the applicant claims to have been a victim.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Skareby to pay, in addition to her own costs, three quarters of the costs of the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Skareby to pay, in addition to her own costs, three quarters of the costs of the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay one quarter of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay one quarter of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010, p. 55.

1

---
Exhibit 20.1
                                                     ------------

Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1995-A


From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.



                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------


Due Period 20 Beginning Date                     04/01/1997
Due Period 20 End Date                           04/30/1997
Determination Date                               05/09/1997
Remittance Date                                  05/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 23.8552439843

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.1337869276

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 533,567.52
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.3556311513

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,824,430.06
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,973,651.45
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ 149,221.39

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 604,490,060.40
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.402902140874

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 32,014,051.45
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999922%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 32,014,051.45
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 30,224,503.02
### [§§143 to 146. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–207, §11, Aug. 28, 1957, 71 Stat. 483]

Sections, act Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1020, related to the following subject matter:

Section 143, decennial census period; completion of reports upon inquiries. See section 141 of this title.

Section 144, restriction on inquiries. See sections 141(a) and 142 of this title.

Section 145, commencement of inquiries as to population, agriculture, and housing; time for completion. See sections 141(a) and 142(a) of this title.

Section 146, mid-decade censuses of agriculture; exclusion of certain areas; preliminary statistics. See sections 142(a), 191, and 193 of this title.