alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010288EN.01007301.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/73

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Palou Martínez v Commission

(Case F-11/10)

(Public service - Officials - Manifestly inadmissible - Delay - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure)

(2010/C 288/137)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: María Soledad Palou Martínez (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: V. Balfagon Costa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Re:

Application to annul the decision to reassign the applicant to headquarters in Brussels.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Ms Palou Martínez is ordered to bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Palou Martínez is ordered to bear her own costs.

---
§ 9002.12 Expenditure report period. *Expenditure report period* means, with respect to any Presidential election, the period of time described in either paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, as appropriate. ( a ) In the case of a major party, the expenditure report period begins on September 1 before the election or on the date on which the major party's presidential nominee is chosen, whichever is earlier; and the period ends 30 days after the Presidential election.
( b ) In the case of a minor or new party, the period will be the same as that of the major party with the shortest expenditure report period for that Presidential election as determined under paragraph (a) of this section.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul H. Sunu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ PAUL H. SUNU Paul H. Sunu Chief Executive Officer


September 29, 2010

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.51

DEMAND NOTE

 

$140,000	April 9, 2001

	FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ELISABETH B. ROBERT (the "Borrower") promises to pay **ON DEMAND** to the order of VERMONT TEDDY BEAR COMPANY, INC. (the "Lender") the principal sum of $140,000 together with interest on the unpaid principal balance at the rate in the manner specified as follows:

	a.	Commencing on the date hereof, interest shall accrue on the unpaid principal outstanding from time to time at a floating rate equal to the "applicable federal rate" on short term borrowings as defined by subsection 1274(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The interest rate shall change with each reported change in the "applicable federal rate." The interest required to be paid pursuant to this paragraph shall be computed daily on the basis of 365 days per year for the actual number of days elapsed on the actual outstanding balance.

	b.	The entire unpaid principal balance, all accrued but unpaid interest, and all other sums to the Lender under this Note, shall be due and payable in full **ON DEMAND**; provided, however, that Lender shall not be entitled to make demand prior to the earlier of (i) the termination of Borrower's employment with Lender for any reason or (ii) the sale by Borrower of any portion of the securities constituting Collateral for repayment of this Note.

	Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America at 6655 Shelburne Road, Shelburne, Vermont 05482 or at such other place as the Lender may designate in writing.

	The Borrower further agrees that if this Note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or if this debt or any part thereof is collected by any attorney or by legal proceedings of any kind, reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs and expenses incident upon such collection shall be added to the amount due upon this Note and be collectible as a part hereof.

	This Note is secured by securities referenced in the Stock Pledge Agreement from Borrower to Lender of even date (the "Collateral"). The Note is to be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Vermont.

 

 

 

	**NOTICE TO BORROWER: THIS IS A DEMAND NOTE AND SO MAY BE COLLECTED BY THE LENDER AT ANY TIME. A NEW NOTE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON AND SUBSEQUENTLY ISSUED MAY CARRY A HIGHER OR LOWER RATE OF INTEREST.
 **
IN THE PRESENCE OF THE 			BORROWER
FOLLOWING WITNESSES:

 

S/ Courtney Griesser					s/Elisabeth B. Robert

							

 

							The Vermont Teddy Bear Co., Inc.

S/Mark Sleeper					By:	s/ Fred Marks

								Its Chairman and

								duly authorized agent
### §2279a–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–181, title VII, §7.5, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §416, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1646, which required reports by merged banks for cooperatives, was renumbered section 3.29 of title III of Pub. L. 92–181 by Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §408(e), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1001, and was classified to section 2149a of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(16), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4680.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSE ALB ER TO C EVALLOSR ODRIGUEZ, AKA JoseAlbe rto C e b a llos, AKA Jose

Albe rto C e va llo, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-70576 Age n c y No. A095-733-040 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d July 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, B EA, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. Jose Albe rto C e v a llos-R odrigue z , a native and c itiz e n

of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing his m otion to re o pe n . W e dism i ss the pe tition for re vie w. 

# FIL ED JUL 27 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha t the e vide nc e C e va llos-R odrigue z subm itte d with his motion to re o pe n doe s not e sta blish a prim a fa c i e c a se of e x c e ptiona l a nd e x tre m e ly

unusua l ha

rdship for thepurpose s of c anc e lla tion of re m ova l , whe re the e v ide n c e C e va llos-R o drigue z pre se nte d with his m otion c o nc e rne d the sa

m e ha rdship grounds a s his a

pplic ation for c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l in his origina

l re m ova l proc e e dings. Se eFe r nande z v . Gonzale

s , 439 F.3d 592, 601 (9th C ir. 2006) (“ If . . . the B IA de te rm ine s tha t a m otion to re ope n proc e e dings in which the re ha s a lre a dy be e n a n unre vie wa

ble disc re tiona

ry de te rm i nation c onc e rning a sta t utory pre re quisiteto re lie f doe s not m ake out a prim a fa c ie c a se for tha

t re lie f, [8 U.S.C .] § 1252(a)(2)(B )(i) pre c l ude s our visiting the m e rits, just a s it would if the B IA ha d a ffirm e d the [im m igration judge ] on dire c t a ppe a l.” ). B e c a use the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha t C e va llos-R odrigue z did not de m onstra

te a prim a fa c ie c a se of the re quisiteha rdship is dispositive , we do not re a c h C e v a llos-R odrigue z ’ re m a ining c onte ntions. S e eSime onov

v . Ashc roft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th C ir. 2004) (“ As a ge ne ra l rule c ourts a

n d a ge nc ie s a

re not re quire d to m ake findings on issue s the de c ision of whic h is unne c e ssa ry to the re sults they

re a c h.” (c ita

tion a nd quota tion m arks om itte d)). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D. 13- 70576 2
```

[Federal Register: October 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 209)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 66665]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29oc10-9]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement

30 CFR Parts 201, 202, 203, 204, 206, 207, 208, 210, 212, 217, 218, 
219, 220, 227, 228, 229, 241, 243, and 290

Office of Natural Resources Revenue

30 CFR Parts 1201, 1202, 1203, 1204, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1210, 1212, 
1217, 1218, 1219, 1220, 1227, 1228, 1229, 1241, 1243, and 1290

[Docket No. MMS-2010-MRM-0033]
RIN 1010-AD70

 
Reorganization of Title 30, Code of Federal Regulations

    In rule document 2010-24721 beginning on page 61051 in the issue of 
Monday, October 4, 2010, make the following corrections:

PART 1206--PRODUCT VALUATION [CORRECTED]

    1. On page 61070, in the table, in the first column, in the fourth 
row, ``Sec.  1206.52(c)(2)'' should read ``Sec.  1206.52(c)(2)(i)''.
    2. On the same page, in the same table, in the same column, in the 
eleventh row, ``Sec.  1206.53(e)(5) two times'' should read 
``1206.52(e)(5) two times''.
    3. On the same page, in the same table, in the same column, in both 
the fifteenth and sixteenth rows, ``Sec.  1206.52(c) introductory 
text'' should read ``Sec.  1206.53(c) introductory text''.
    4. On page 61071, in the table, in the third column, in the 
eighteenth row from the bottom of the page, ``part 207'' should read 
``part 1207.''
    5. On the same page, in the same table, in the same column, in the 
seventh row from the bottom of the page, the blank entry should read 
``ONRR.''
    6. On page 61072, in the table, in the third column, in the 22nd 
row, the blank entry should read ``Sec.  1206.111''.
    7. On page 61073, in the table, in the third column, in the 16th 
row, ``Associate Director'' should read ``Director''.

PART 1208--SALE OF FEDERAL ROYALTY OIL [CORRECTED]

    8. On page 61081, in the table, in the third column, in the first 
row, ``Sec.  208.8(a)'' should read ``Sec.  1208.8(a)''.
    9. On the same page, in the same table, in the same column, in the 
fifth row, ``Sec.  208.7(g)'' should read ``Sec.  1208.7(g)''.

[FR Doc. C1-2010-24721 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-W-P
```
### §5372. Rule of construction

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit or curtail the Corporation's current authority to examine or bring enforcement actions with respect to any insured depository institution or institution-affiliated party.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title I, §172(c), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1439.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1376, known as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which enacted this chapter and chapters 108 (§8201 et seq.) and 109 (§8301 et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and enacted, amended, and repealed numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.
#### Ellen Davern, as Administratrix, etc., of John Davern, Deceased, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to §4,500, in which event, judgment as so modified and order affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Settle order on notice.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30,2010 filed on the date hereof with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ JOHANN DREYERJohann DreyerChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
United States Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR Filing


EXHIBIT 10.11

LEASE AGREEMENT




April 22, 2008




China Logistics Group, Inc., a Florida company, (“China Logistics”) agrees to lease from ETI International, Inc., a California company, (“ETI”), the property located at 7300 Alondra Blvd., Suite 108, Paramount, CA 90723, upon the following terms and conditions:




1.

The term of this agreement shall begin on May 1, 2008 and terminate on April 30, 2010.




2.

Monthly rent of $5,000.00 is payable in advance on the first calendar day of each calendar month payable to ETI.




3.

China Logistics shall occupy 668 square feet of office space at 7300 Alondra Blvd., Suite 108, Paramount, CA 90723 dedicated to China Logistics.




4.

In exchange for the $5,000 ETI shall provide the following:




a.

office furniture, office supplies, and necessary communication equipment including but not limited to phones, fax machine, printer, computer, and internet access.




b.

a separate phone and fax line dedicated to China Logistics, which shall be provided to China Logistics.




c.

Address public inquiries about China Logistics in the form of phone call, fax, and/or email.




d.

Staff the offices from Monday to Friday, 8:00am-5:00pm.




e.

Deliver professional presentation on behalf of China Logistics.




f.

Assist China Logistics management in communicating with investor relations consultants and reporting significant events about China Logistics.




g.

Provide utility services for the office space, including but not limited to water, electricity, air conditioning, cleaning services, etc.




						
	CHINA LOGISTICS GROUP, INC.

	 
	 
	ETI INTERNATIONAL, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ V. Jeffrey Harrell

	5/6/08

	     

	/s/ Davy Shum

	 
	5/06/08


	Sign Name

	Date

	 
	Sign Name

	 
	Date


	  

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	V. Jeffrey Harrell

	 
	Davy Shum


	Print Name

	 
	 
	Print Name
### §121. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(f)(4)(B), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2292

Section, acts June 20, 1874, ch. 343, §3, 18 Stat. 123; Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §20, 38 Stat. 271; May 29, 1920, ch. 214, §1, 41 Stat. 654, provided that every national banking association was to establish reserve in Treasury for redemption of notes by Treasurer of United States, forward notes unfit for use to Treasurer for disposition, and reimburse expenses of Treasury.
### §2516. Members asserting post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury

(a) Medical Examination Required.—

(1) In general.—The Secretary shall ensure that a member of the Coast Guard who has performed Coast Guard operations or has been sexually assaulted during the preceding 2-year period, and who is diagnosed by an appropriate licensed or certified healthcare professional as experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury or who otherwise alleges, based on the service of the member or based on such sexual assault, the influence of such a condition, receives a medical examination to evaluate a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury.

(2) Restriction on administrative separation.—A member described in paragraph (1) shall not be administratively separated under conditions other than honorable, including an administrative separation in lieu of a court-martial, until the results of the medical examination have been reviewed by appropriate authorities responsible for evaluating, reviewing, and approving the separation case, as determined by the Secretary.

(3) Post-traumatic stress disorder.—In a case involving post-traumatic stress disorder under this subsection, a medical examination shall be—

(A) performed by—

(i) a board-certified or board-eligible psychiatrist; or

(ii) a licensed doctorate-level psychologist; or

(B) performed under the close supervision of—

(i) a board-certified or board-eligible psychiatrist; or

(ii) a licensed doctorate-level psychologist, a doctorate-level mental health provider, a psychiatry resident, or a clinical or counseling psychologist who has completed a 1-year internship or residency.

(4) Traumatic brain injury.—In a case involving traumatic brain injury under this subsection, a medical examination shall be performed by a physiatrist, psychiatrist, neurosurgeon, or neurologist.

(b) Purpose of Medical Examination.—The medical examination required under subsection (a) shall assess whether the effects of mental or neurocognitive disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury, constitute matters in extenuation that relate to the basis for administrative separation under conditions other than honorable or the overall characterization of the service of the member as other than honorable.

(c) Inapplicability to Proceedings Under Uniform Code of Military Justice.—The medical examination and procedures required by this section do not apply to courts-martial or other proceedings conducted pursuant to the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

(d) Coast Guard Operations Defined.—In this section, the term "Coast Guard operations" has the meaning given that term in section 888(a) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 468(a)).

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXIV, §11410(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4116.)
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)  of the Exchange Act

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:



|By: | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
May 14, 2004

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-126827) and Form F-3 (No. 333-188176) of GrupoTelevisa, S.A.B. of our report dated April 29, 2014 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers, S.C. 

/s/ Jorge López deCárdenas Melgar 

C.P.C. Jorge López de Cárdenas Melgar 

Audit Partner 

México, D.F. 

April 29, 2014
# C_2007095EN.01000202.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 March 2007 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln — Germany) — Wienand Meilicke, Heidi Christa Weyde, Marina Stöffler v Finanzamt Bonn-Innenstadt

(Case C-292/04) (1)

1

(Income tax - Tax credit for dividends paid by resident companies - Articles 56 EC and 58 EC - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)

(2007/C 95/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Wienand Meilicke, Heidi Christa Weyde, Marina Stöffler

Applicants:

Defendant: Finanzamt Bonn-Innenstadt

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Köln — Interpretation of Articles 56 EC and 58 EC — Income-tax rules providing for a ‘tax credit ’for dividends distributed by national companies but not for dividends distributed by companies which have their seat in another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 56 EC and 58 EC are to be interpreted as precluding tax legislation under which, on a distribution of dividends by a capital company, a shareholder who is fully taxable in a Member State is entitled to a tax credit, calculated by reference to the corporation tax rate on the distributed profits, if the dividend-paying company is established in that same Member State but not if it is established in another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 11.9.2004.

1

---
#### § 700.321 Direct appeal to Commissioners.

Commission determinations concerning issues other than individual eligibility or benefits which do not require a hearing may be appealed directly to the Commission in writing. The Commission decision will constitute final agency action on such issues.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0747

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

CHRISTOPHER NUCKOLLS,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 and

NANCY NUCKOLLS,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Appellant Christopher Nuckolls was granted an extension of time to file and serve 

the opening brief on or before May 1, 2023. The opening brief is now overdue.

THEREFORE,

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file, and serve the opening brief on 

appeal no later than June 1, 2023. Failure to file the brief within that time will result in 

dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all parties in this appeal. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 4 2023

05/04/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0747