alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1
<CASH>                                             1,832,677
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      2,258,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (45,703)
<INVENTORY>                                        1,103,355
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   5,653,791
<PP&E>                                             1,561,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (322,616)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    14,956,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,708,681
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             252,736
<OTHER-SE>                                        12,597,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      14,956,800
<SALES>                                           13,621,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  13,621,292
<CGS>                                              5,528,542
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      5,528,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   4,431,839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    3,776,609
<INCOME-TAX>                                       1,340,697
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                2,435,912
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                       2,435,912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .96
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE RAKO CORPORATION FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
               AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
               SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,025
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
# C_2006190EN.01002801.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/28

---

Action brought on 28 June 2006 — PowderJect Research v OHIM (POWDERMED)

(Case T-166/06)

(2006/C 190/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PowderJect Research Ltd (Oxford, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Bryson, Barrister, P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 April 2006, relating to the applicant's Community trade mark application No 4202743 for POWERMED in classes 5, 10 and 42; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 April 2006, relating to the applicant's Community trade mark application No 4202743 for POWERMED in classes 5, 10 and 42;

| — | award costs in favour of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

award costs in favour of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘POWDERMED’ for goods and services in classes 5, 10 and 42 — application No 4 202 743

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 40/94. The Board of Appeal erred in treating the trade mark as being composed of two English words in common usage and it gave no or insufficient consideration to the structure of the trade mark applied for by not taking into account that the trade mark would at first sight suggest the past tense of a verb by reason of its closing letters ‘...ed’ and that it would not be immediately apparent to the relevant public that the trade mark could be dissected into ‘powder’ and ‘med’.

Pleas in law:

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEVEN R. POWELL
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 1221

[August 19, 2015 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; David Crow , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 502012CF005639AXXX

.

Steven R. Powell, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Steven Richard Powell appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850
motion which the trial court found to be untimely. Following an order to show cause, the state concedes error. We remand for the court to consider
the merits of his claims.

While on probation, Powell committed new, substantive offenses. He was charged with attempted burglary of a dwelling (count 1) and criminal mischief ($1,000 or more) (count 2). From the sparse record on appeal, it appears that the codefendant, Larry Dean Hafner, also was charged with possession of cocaine (count 3) and possession of marijuana less than 20 grams (count 4). According to Powell’s motion, he entered a guilty plea and was convicted on all four counts, even though he was not charged
with count s 3 and 4. It is unclear from the record whether Powell was convicted of both counts 3 and 4 or only count 3.

A conviction for an uncharged crime can be raised at any time as it is a denial of due process. See, e.g., Jaimes v. State, 51 So. 3d 445, 44 8 (Fla. 2010) (“It is a fundamental principle of due process that a defendant may not be convicted of a crime that has not been charged by the state.”). The2

fact that a plea was negotiated would not cure the error. Moore v. State

, 924 So. 2d 840, 841 (Fl a. 4th DCA 2006). The trial court could have considered the untimely 3.850 motion as a petition for writ of habeas

corpus.

We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the merits of
Powell’s motion and determine whether he was convicted of uncha rged
crimes in counts 3 and 4.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

S TEVENSON
, L EVINE and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2007126EN.01001101.xml

| 7.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 June 2007

(2007/C 126/08)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3513 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4467 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3400 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6452 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 84,53 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0800 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5832 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,433 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,99 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8315 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2668 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,215 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7850 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6053 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4341 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5558 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8020 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0696 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 252,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7390 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3183 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3430 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 033,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6214 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,092 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,8990 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,208 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3513

JPY

Japanese yen

163,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4467

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67830

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3400

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6452

ISK

Iceland króna

84,53

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0800

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5832

CZK

Czech koruna

28,433

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,99

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8315

RON

Romanian leu

3,2668

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,215

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7850

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6053

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4341

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5558

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8020

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0696

KRW

South Korean won

1 252,66

ZAR

South African rand

9,7390

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3183

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3430

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 033,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6214

PHP

Philippine peso

62,092

RUB

Russian rouble

34,8990

THB

Thai baht

44,208

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2014135EN.01003401.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/34

---

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2014 — FESI v Council

(Case T-134/10) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Dumping - Extension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather coming from Macao - Association representing independent importers - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 135/42

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fédération européenne de l’industrie du sport (FESI) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Vermulst and Y. van Gerven, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, Agents, assisted by G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, Barrister, and subsequently by J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and M. França, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and the People’s Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (OJ 1996 L 352, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The Fédération européenne de l’industrie du sport (FESI) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Fédération européenne de l’industrie du sport (FESI) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

| 3. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
#### § 147.30 Molecular examination procedures.

Molecular examination must be conducted in a manner approved by the Administrator. Approved molecular examination procedures are listed in the NPIP Program Standards, as defined in § 147.51. Molecular examination procedures may also be approved by the Administrator in accordance with § 147.53(d)(1).

[79 FR 38766, July 9, 2014]
#### Patrick A. Cronin, an Infant, by Patrick Cronin, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Manhattan Transit Company, Respondent.

Second Department,

February 28, 1908.

Trial — change of venue for convenience of witnesses — demand.

The court on motion to change the place of trial for convenience of witnesses may change.the trial to the proper county, although no demand has been made.

Appeal by the plaintiff, Patrick A. Cronin, an infant, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered m the office of the clerk of the county of Suffolk on the 26th day of November, 1907, granting the defendant’s motion to change the place of trial from the county of Suffolk to the county of New York.

*544■1 *George S. Wing [George A. Love*with him on the- brief]-, for the appellant. _ . ' '■

*Balph P. BueTl \_George S. Graham*and: *Henry W. King,*with him on the brief], for the respondent.

¡Rich, J.:

The motion was made to change the place of trial from the county of.Suffolk to the county of ¡New Yorlt for the’ convenience' of witnesses. Upon the hearing it appeared that the- place of trial designated in, the-complaint is not the proper county, and the learned trial justice presiding at the Special Term made an order' changing the place of trial. The learned counsel for the appellant contends that the order was improperly granted and cites *Phillips*v. *Tietjen*(108 App. Div. 9) to support his contention. In that " case- no demand was served; in fact no motion Was" made to change-the place of trial. Both parties were ready to try, and were proceeding with the trial of the. case in Queens county when the court, of its own motion, changed the .place of trial:; and 'it was held, upon appeal from the order, that in a transitory action the power did not lie in the, court to change the place of trial irrespective of the wishes of. the parties. .It was not intended -there to hold that where a party comes into court with a motion to change the place of trial for the " convenience of witnesses, the court may not change the place of trial to the proper county, although no demand had been made. We .believe the court to be vested with that power, *(McConihe*v. Palmer, 76 Hun, 116.)

The order must be affirmed, without costs.

Jenks, Hooker,. Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, without "costs.
§ 124.42 Hearing procedure. ( a ) The presiding officer shall be appointed by the Administrator of APHIS from officers and employees of the Department who have not participated in any action of the Secretary which is the subject of the hearing and who are not directly responsible to an officer or employee of the Department who has participated in any such action.
( b ) Each party to the hearing shall have the right at all times to be advised and accompanied by an attorney.
( c ) Before the hearing, each party to the hearing shall be given reasonable notice of the matters to be considered at the hearing, including a comprehensive statement of the basis for the action taken or proposed by the Secretary which is the subject of the hearing and any general summary of the information which will be presented at the hearing in support of such action.
( d ) At the hearing the parties to the hearing shall have the right to hear a full and complete statement of the action which is the subject of the hearing together with the information and reasons supporting such action, to conduct reasonable questioning, and to present any oral and written information relevant to such action.
( e ) The presiding officer in such hearing shall prepare a written report of the hearing to which shall be attached all written material presented at the hearing. The participants in the hearing shall be given the opportunity to review and correct or supplement the presiding officer's report of the hearing.
( f ) The Secretary may require the hearing to be transcribed. A party to the hearing shall have the right to have the hearing transcribed at his expense. Any transcription of a hearing shall be included in the presiding officer's report of the hearing.
( g ) The due diligence hearing will be conducted in accordance with rules of practice adopted for the proceeding. APHIS will provide the requesting party, the applicant, and the petitioner with an opportunity to participate as a party in the hearing. The standard of due diligence set forth in § 124.33 will apply at the hearing. The party requesting the due diligence hearing will have the burden of proof at the hearing.
**New Jersey Rural Development State Office**521 Fellowship RoadSuite 130Mt. Laurel, NJ  08054Tel: 856-787-7700Fax: 855-305-7343

**Questions about Multifamily Housing Programs?**Call 1-800-292-8293

                          -    - State DirectorJane Asselta (View Bio)
 
                          -                      View All State Contacts                   
                          -                        Follow the RD New Jersey Office on X                     
                          -                        Receive Emails Through GovDelivery                     

## Rural Development Success Stories

### Invasions and Investments Keep Jersey Town Afloat

Read More

### Geothermal Technology Helps Couple Make Year-Round Cut Flower Farm a Reality

### The Greatest Thing in the World: Senior Praises USDA Rural Development Funded Food Pantry

### ‘Sustainability should hurt’: Making wine without the whine

View All Success Stories

## Highlights and Announcements

                                -    USDA Extends Application Deadline to March 21 for the Rural Energy for Amer... 
                                -    Notice of New Jersey Eligible Area Map Review for Housing Programs 
                                -    USDA Launches New Tool to Make it Easier for Lenders to Provide Feedback on... 
                                -    Department of Agriculture, Department of Energy Launch Initiative to Help F... 

### Featured Programs

                          -  Single Family Housing Direct Home Loans 
                          -  Single Family Housing Repair Loans & Grants 
                          -  Water & Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Community Facilities Direct Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Value-Added Producer Grants 
                          -  Rural Energy for America Program Renewable Energy Systems & Energy Efficiency Improvement Guaranteed Loans & Grants 
View All State Programs

### Resources

**Check Eligibility**Check a home, town or service location to verify eligibility for Rural Programs

**Manage your USDA Loan**You can create an account and manage your current loan through the Customer Service Center (CSC) portal. You can also contact the CSC at 800-414-1226
View All Resources

## Rural Development News

                                -  USDA and Norwescap Announce Grant to Support EntrepreneurshipApr 04, 2024 
                                -  Op-Ed: Marking Two Years with  New Jersey Rural DevelopmentMar 12, 2024 
                                -  USDA Extends Application Deadline to March 21 for the Rural Energy for America Technical Assistance Grant ProgramMar 05, 2024 
                                -  Department of Agriculture, Department of Energy Launch Initiative to Help Farmers Reduce Costs with Underutilized Renewable TechnologiesFeb 27, 2024 
                                -  Invasions and Investments Keep Jersey Town AfloatFeb 22, 2024 
                                -  USDA Announces Hands-On Support to Help Ag Producers Applying for Energy GrantsFeb 20, 2024 

View All State News
**EXHIBIT
      23**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
      333-63781) of Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated February
      15, 2007, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of
      Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and
      2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
      shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
      ended December 31, 2006, which report is included in the December 31, 2006
      annual report on Form 10-K of Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc.







/s/
      Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker





Bangor,
      Maine


February
      26, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Guthrie, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  May 19, 2006

/s/David Guthrie

David Guthrie

President and

Principal Executive Officer