alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1316

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that any amount

allowable as a child tax credit under section 24 or an earned income

credit under section 32 shall not be treated as income for purposes

of any means-tested Federal program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1, 1999

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

that any amount allowable as a child tax credit under

section 24 or an earned income credit under section

32 shall not be treated as income for purposes of any

means-tested Federal program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COORDINATION OF CHILD TAX CREDIT WITH

4 CERTAIN MEANS-TESTED PROGRAMS.

5 Section 24 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re6 lating to child tax credit) is amended by adding at the

7 end the following new subsection:
2

•S 1316 IS

1 ‘‘(g) COORDINATION WITH CERTAIN MEANS-TESTED

2 PROGRAMS.—Any refund or credit made to an individual

3 by reason of this section shall not be treated as income

4 or receipts (or taken into account in determining re5 sources) for purposes of determining—

6 ‘‘(1) the eligibility of the individual or any other

7 individual for any month for benefits or assistance

8 under any Federal program or any State or local

9 program financed in whole or in part with Federal

10 funds, or

11 ‘‘(2) the amount or extent of such benefits or

12 assistance.’’

13 SEC. 2. COORDINATION OF EARNED INCOME CREDIT WITH

14 CERTAIN MEANS-TESTED PROGRAMS.

15 Subsection (l) of section 32 of the Internal Revenue

16 Code of 1986 (relating to coordination with certain means17 tested programs) is amended to read as follows:

18 ‘‘(l) COORDINATION WITH CERTAIN MEANS-TESTED

19 PROGRAMS.—Any refund or credit made to an individual

20 by reason of this section, and any payment made to such

21 individual by an employer under section 3507, shall not

22 be treated as income or receipts (or taken into account

23 in determining resources) for purposes of determining—

24 ‘‘(1) the eligibility of the individual or any other

25 individual for any month for benefits or assistance
3

•S 1316 IS

1 under any Federal program or any State or local

2 program financed in whole or in part with Federal

3 funds, or

4 ‘‘(2) the amount or extent of such benefits or

5 assistance.’’

Æ
#### § 151.4 Pedigree certificate.

A pedigree certificate for an animal of a breed listed in § 151.9 issued by the custodian of the appropriate book of record listed in said section and on which there has been entered in accordance with the rules of entry of the registry association, a complete record of transfers of ownership from the breeder to and including the United States importer, or a complete record of transfers of ownership from the breeder to and including the person who owns the animal when it is imported into the United States and the name of the United States importer (for example, a lessee), shall be furnished by the owner, agent, or importer to the inspector at the time of the examination of the animal as provided in § 151.7. The inspector will return the document to the party who submitted it. A verbatim translation of the description relating to color and markings shall appear in English in the pedigree certificate for the animal or in a separate certificate appended to the pedigree certificate.

[26 FR 6072, July 7, 1961]
# AD Grid Sheet

**o~SG:>** Docket 

### No.: FAA-2014-  Directorate Identifier: 

### 2013-NM-214-AD AD Action: 

### Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) This action applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200LR, -300, -300ER , and 777F series airplanes. CONCURRENCES OUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE (Fi r st Initial/Last Name)



### c.~ OUTING SYMBOL ANM-114



### If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign 

### the grid to the right with your first initial

** ~:;_:_".L!.~~::::_**

### __ and full last name 

### to show concurrence with this AD.

SIGNATURE (First Initiai!Last Name) DATE ROUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE (First lnitia i!Las t Name)

ATE ROUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE (F ir s t Initial / Last Name)

ATE OUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE (First Initial / Last Name)

ATE

## AD Grid Sheet O:l-Gfc. DocketNo.: FAA-2014-  Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-214-AD 

### AD Action: 

### Notice of proposed rulemak.ing (NPRM) 

### T his ac ti on applies to The Boeing Company Mode] 777-200LR , -300 , -300ER , 

### and 777 F series airplanes. If this draft is 

### acceptable, please legibly sign 

### the grid to the right with your first initial** t--~:L--r----­** and full last name 

### to show concurrence with this AD.

IG N ATU R E (Firslln i l ia i/ Lasl Name)

IGN ATU R E (Firsllniciai / Lasl Name)

## AD Grid Sheet Q.25tp Docket 

### No.: FAA-2014-  Directorate Identifier: 

### 2013-NM-214-AD A D Action: 

### Notice o f proposed rulemaking (NPRM) T his action applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200LR, -300 , -300ER , and 777 F series ai rplanes. O N CURREN CE S OU TI NG** SYMBO****~** ANM-l30S

ROUT ING S Y MBOL <

### ~N**3os** 

### _ 1



### SIGNfiff**!);F rs~**  I**~if~ Las** **. ~t-c)**  

## IV 

# t//JY. · (J.!4/ , · 1
If thi s draft is acceptable , please legibly sign 

### the grid to the right with your first initial

### J....,..,.~.::..___,,....___ _ and full last name 

### to show concurrence with this AD .

ROUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE (First lni t i:olilA1sl Name) DATE ROUTING SYMBOL S I

GNATURE (First lnitinl 1 L1St Name) DATE

OUTING SYMBOL I GNATURE (first l nitiai i L1st Name) DATE
AAM-11-174-E March 01, 2011 Exemption No. 10216 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0128

Ms. Catherine Yelle

Chief Pilot Helicopter Flight Services, Inc. 112 Charles Lindbergh Drive, Hangar 111 Teterboro, NJ 07608

Dear Ms. Yelle:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 10, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Helicopter Flight Services, Inc. (HFS) for an exemption from §§ 120.117(b) and 120.225(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow HFS, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to HFS.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—2

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Helicopter Flight Services, Inc. an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow HFS, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of HFS are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the HFS part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Deputy James R. Fraiser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
USDA GUS TRAINING

APPLICATION DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FORMS
Training Objectives:

• Understanding of how to utilize the Application Documents and Request Forms 

tabs in GUS.

• Upload a document to GUS. 

• Document requirements for upload process.

• Submit and view documents in GUS.
Application Documents: Initial Steps

Steps:

1. Navigate to the Application 

Documents tab from the More 

drop-down.

2. Review the borrower 

information.

3. Review the file upload 

instructions (also review Note 

section highlighted in yellow on 

page).

4. Select the Type of Document to 

upload.

5. Select the Upload Files button to 

select a file from the user’s 

system.
Application Documents: Next Steps

Steps:

1. Select the document to be 

uploaded from the user’s 

system.

2. Click Open to attach to the 

loan application.

3. Wait for the upload to 

complete as indicated in the 

Upload Files dialogue box. 

Select the Done button 

when the upload is 

complete.
Application Documents: Final Steps

Steps:

1. To submit the selected 

and uploaded 

document(s), select the 

Submit Document(s) 

button.

2. Submitted documents 

appear in the 

Submitted Documents 

section.

3. Select the eye icon 

under the Actions

column to view the 

document.

4. Use the action buttons 

to navigate through the 

submitted document(s).
Request Forms

Steps:

1. Navigate to the Request 

Forms tab and select the 

borrowers to be included 

on the Form 3555-21.

2. Select the Display Form 

button.

3. Depending on your 

browser, the downloaded 

Form 3555-21 file will be 

available in Downloads or 

otherwise available for 

selection.

Note:

Data on this form and 

throughout this guide is 

sample data only.
End Slide 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
CONFORMED COPY

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Millicom International Cellular, S.A. a company incorporated under the laws of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
March 5, 2010

By:

/s/ FRANCOIS-XAVIER ROGER Name: Francois-Xavier Roger
Title:Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                          WESTERN NATIONAL CORPORATION
 
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            NAME                             STATE OF INCORPORATION
                            ----                             ----------------------
<S>                                                          <C>
WNL Holding Corp............................................        Delaware
 
  Western National Life Insurance Company...................         Texas
 
  Conseco Annuity Guarantee Company.........................         Texas
 
  WNL Insurance Services, Inc...............................        Delaware
 
  WNL Investment Advisory Services, Inc.....................        Delaware
 
  WNL Brokerage Services, Inc...............................        Delaware
 
  Independent Advantage Financial and Insurance Services,
     Inc....................................................       California
</TABLE>
 
The ownership of the above listed subsidiaries is 100%.
 
     WNL Series Trust (all of the shares of which are held in the separate
account of Western National Life Insurance Company for the benefit of the
Western National Life Insurance Company variable annuity policyholders).
- Home
- Newsroom

# Latest Actions

April 9, 2024Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory CommitteePlease monitor this website for forthcoming meeting details. You may also review the Federal Register Notice for additional information.

April 5, 2024PHMSA 2021-2022 Expanded Hazmat Supplement Commodity Flow Statistics 
PHMSA, in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau (Census), sponsored an expansion of the 2022 Commodity Flow Survey to include supplemental...

March 11, 2024Safety Advisory Notice: Classification of Monkeypox Diagnostic Samples and Waste
PHMSA's **Safety Advisory Notice** shares new advice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regarding...

March 5, 2024PHMSA Pipeline Annual Report Changes for Calendar Year 2024 (reports submitted in 2025)
Pipeline operators are in the midst of submitting calendar year 2023 annual reports to PHMSA with data as-of 12/31/2023.  During 2024, pipeline operators may need to change their internal systems for collecting excavation damage data for annual...

February 23, 2024Safety Advisory Notice on the Possible Catastrophic Failure of Nurse Tanks and Recommendation for Periodic Testing
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration issued this safety advisory to provide notice of the possibility of catastrophic failure of certain nurse tanks manufactured from January 1...

February 20, 2024Now Available: PHMSA’s Redesigned Pipeline Safety Enforcement Transparency Webpage
PHMSA’s Office of Pipeline Safety’s Enforcement Division launched a redesigned enforcement transparency page on February 16 to provide a centralized location for enforcement data and...

December 28, 2023PHMSA Social Equity Mapping Tools Promote Data Transparency and Environmental Justice
PHMSA Social Equity Mapping Tools allows viewers to visualize pipeline accidents and incidents across the U.S. This effort seeks to promote data transparency by making pipeline incident data easier to access and understand for the public.  ...

October 12, 2023Upcoming Research and Development (R&D) Events
 **Pipeline Safety Research and Development Forum 2023****October 31-November 1, 2023 | 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m**Westin Crystal City Reagan National Airport1800 Richmond Highway, Arlington, Virginia...

October 3, 2023PHMSA Consent Order and Agreement to Equitrans Midstream Corp.
Today, PHMSA and Equitrans Midstream Corporation (ETRN) entered into a Consent Agreement (hyperlink), requiring ETRN to take corrective measures following informal consultation with the operator. The actions outlined in the Consent Agreement include...

September 22, 2023PHMSA Explanation of Classification of Thermite Mixtures
This notice is being published to inform the regulated community of how PHMSA has previously reviewed and classified certain thermite formulations and how it has temporarily reclassified certain thermite formulations as Division 4.1 flammable...

# Pagination

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
- ...
-  ››› 
-  »Last »
#### Weinstein v. Witmer

*412
      *Leonard A. Cohen,*for plaintiff.

*Calvin Taylor Jr.*and *Kevin S. Riechelson,*for defendants.

February 27, 2001

FIELD, *J.,*

Defendant, Paul Witmer, appeals from this court’s order entered on December 8, 2000, granting a new trial. For the reasons which follow, the order was proper and should be affirmed.

This case arises from a motor vehicle accident which occurred on August 27, 1998. On November 1, 2000, a *413jury trial commenced. After three days of testimony, on November 3, 2000, the jury returned a verdict for the defense. No motions were filed in the following 10 days as required by Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. However, within a few days of the expiration of the 10-day period, counsel for the plaintiff and both defendants jointly requested a conference with the court. Said conference was held in chambers on November 16, 2000.

At the conference, counsel relayed to the court that a court officer assisting in jury selection had apparently made some remarks which could have influenced the outcome in this matter. Specifically, it was brought to the court’s attention that some members of the jury venire had expressed disdain for the judicial system and the existence of “frivolous lawsuits.” In response, the court officer reportedly replied that the proposed jurors should want to serve so that they could rid the courts of such suits. While the court is of the belief that the court officer was not referring to the instant lawsuit, counsel raised the point that such a comment could have been misinterpreted in that manner. It should be noted that none of the above exchanges were on the record, but the mere possibility that such an exchange may have taken place raised concern.

The decision whether to grant a new trial is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Absent an abuse of that discretion or a clear error of law, the decision should not be disturbed. *Gunn*v. *Grossman,*748 A.2d 1235 (Pa. Super. 2000). Where, as here, the court finds, that new trial is appropriate in the interest of justice, a new trial is warranted. *Commonwealth*v. *Powell,*527 Pa. 288, 590 A.2d 1240 (1991). Additionally, it need not be upon motion of a *414party, but may be ordered sua sponte by the trial court. *Id.*Cf. *Armbruster*v. *Horowitz,*744 A.2d 285, 287 n.2 (Pa. Super. 1999). Because judgment had not yet been entered when the order for a new trial was entered on December 5, 2000, said order was timely.

For the foregoing reasons, this court’s order dated December 5, 2000, granting a new trial, should be affirmed.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—EMERGING CONTAMINANTS
#### § 354.53 Other applicable regulations.

Compliance with the regulations in this part shall not excuse failure to comply with any other Federal or any State or municipal applicable laws or regulations.
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Environmental Exposure Effects on DOT-CFFC Cylinders with Modal Acoustic Emissi...                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Composite Cylinder Environmental Exposure Effects on DOT-CFFC Cylinders with Modal Acoustic Emission Examination PDF                   

# Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Composite Cylinder Environmental Exposure Effects on DOT-CFFC Cylinders with Modal Acoustic Emission Examination

**June 30, 2015**

The main purpose of this research work was to addresses aggressive environmental exposure effects on DOT-CFFC composite cylinders, and the use of Modal Acoustic Emission (MAE) examination of the cylinders to identify cylinders with compromised strength due to the aggressive environmental exposure. In this study the effects of hard water exposure on the aluminum liner, chemical exposure to the composite overwrap, salt water immersion of the composite cylinder, and structural fire exposure of the composite cylinder were evaluated. This study was a follow up to previous research project, Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Composite Cylinder Life Extension Research Project completed in June 2014. This R&D project was developed by PHMSA, Hazardous Materials Engineering and Research Division. The final report for this R&D project includes mechanical (performance) and nondestructive testing (NDT) data and conclusion. The R&D project will be used as basis for equivalent-safety-evaluation (ESE) of these SCBA composite cylinders that may be used beyond their 15 year service life under a certain conditions and operational controls which includes requalification of each cylinder by using Modal Acoustic Emission (MAE) testing.

For technical question, contact Mr. Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.
#### Stephen Sweet, Appellant, *v.*Hiram H. Tinslar, Respondent.

(Argued April 10, 1877;

decided April 17, 1877.)

*William Barnes,*for appellant.

*Irving*Browne, for respondent.

Agree to affirm. No opinion. All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

More Than $522 million in Grant Funds Requested through First Round of ReConnect Pilot 

Program Applications

Loan-Only and Loan-Grant Combination Applications Still Being Accepted Through 

www.USDA.gov/reconnect

WASHINGTON, June 3, 2019 – Acting Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Joel Baxley today 

announced the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) received 78 applications requesting more than $522 

million in grant-only funding in the first round of the ReConnect Pilot Program. USDA has $200 million 

available for grant-only projects in this round of funding.

The 78 applications received represent 1,688 farms and 1,716 businesses in rural areas across 34 states.

In March 2018, Congress provided $600 million to USDA to expand broadband infrastructure and services in 

rural America, and on December 13, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue announced the rules of the program.

On March 29, 2019, USDA began accepting applications.

For this first round, USDA has made available up to $200 million in grants, $200 million in loan and grant 

combinations, and $200 million in low-interest loans. The application deadlines are:

• May 31, 2019, for grant-only projects; 

• June 21, 2019, for loan/grant combinations; and 

• July 12, 2019, for low-interest loans.

Applicants can request technical assistance from USDA by filling out the contact form at 

https://www.usda.gov/reconnect/contact-us.

State and local governments, Indian tribes, for- and non-profit entities, limited liability companies, and 

cooperative or mutual organizations may apply for funding through USDA’s ReConnect Program to connect 

rural areas that currently have insufficient broadband service. Funds will be awarded to projects that have 

financially sustainable business models that will bring high-speed broadband to rural homes, businesses, farms, 

ranches and community facilities such as first responders, health care sites and schools.

The ReConnect Program enables USDA to create and implement innovative solutions to rural connectivity by 

providing various financial options to our partners and customers. For the announcement opening the 

application windows, see Page 5981 of the Feb 25, 2019, Federal Register. For the first round Reconnect 

Program requirements, see page 64315 of the Dec. 14, 2018, Federal Register or visit reconnect.usda.gov. 

Information for future rounds will also be set forth in the Federal Register, given that Congress has provided an 

additional $550 million for the ReConnect Program.

#