alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     The undersigned hereby certifies that to her knowledge the
quarterly report of TMS, Inc. (the "Company") filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to TMS, Inc. and will
be retained by TMS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: April 13, 2004



                     /s/ Deborah D. Mosier
                     -----------------------------
                     Deborah D. Mosier
                     President and Chief Financial Officer,
                     Principal Executive and Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

T. B.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 189 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Preferability letter regarding change in accounting principle



 Exhibit 10.54 
 June 20, 2008 
 Board of Directors 
 Wise Metals
Group LLC 
 857 Elkridge Landing Road, Suite 600 
 Linthicum, MD
21093 
 Dear Directors: 
 We are providing this letter to you
for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K. 
 We have been provided a copy of the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008. Note 5 therein describes a change in accounting principle for the amortization of the unrecognized gain/loss from the standard amortization methodology under FAS 106 and FAS 87,
which is a methodology of amortizing the net gain or loss that exceeds 10 percent of the greater of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets over the remaining service period, to a methodology of
fully recognizing any gain or loss in excess of 45% of the greater of (1) Accumulated Post-Retirement Benefit Obligation (“APBO”) and (2) market value of assets (“MVA”) and amortizing any gain or loss between
10%—45% of the greater of (1) APBO and (2) MVA over the remaining service period. It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for the amortization of unrecognized gains/losses has
not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management’s determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of
management’s stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with
management that such change represents, in the Company’s circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections. 
 We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2007.
Accordingly, our comments are subject to change upon completion of an audit of the financial statements covering the period of the accounting change. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
	PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Invites Applications for Grants to Strengthen Rural Cooperatives and 

Expand Access to New and Better Markets for People in Rural America

WASHINGTON, April 26, 2023 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is inviting applications for grants to strengthen

rural cooperatives and expand access to new and better markets for people in rural America. 

USDA is making the $5.8 million in grants available under the Rural Cooperative Development Grant (RCDG)

program to start, improve or expand rural cooperatives and other mutually owned businesses that will help 

improve economic conditions in rural areas.

Nonprofit organizations and institutions of higher education are eligible to apply for grants to provide technical 

and cooperative development assistance to individuals and rural businesses. 

The maximum award is $200,000. Grants are awarded on a competitive basis through a national competition.

USDA is particularly interested in applications that will advance Biden-Harris Administration priorities to:

• Reduce climate pollution and increase resilience to the impacts of climate change through economic 

support to rural communities.

• Ensure all rural residents have equitable access to Rural Development (RD) programs and benefits from 

RD-funded projects; and 

• Help rural communities recover economically through more and better market opportunities and through 

improved infrastructure.

Additional information on these key priorities is available at https://www.rd.usda.gov/priority-points.

Electronic applications must be submitted to grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 26, 2023. 

Interested applicants are encouraged to contact their local USDA Rural Development State Office well in 

advance of the application deadline to discuss their project and ask any questions about the RCDG program or 

the application process. Contact information for state offices can be found at http://www.rd.usda.gov/contactus/state-offices.

Additional information on the required materials and how to apply for the RCDG program are available on page 

25369 of the April 26, 2023, Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
# C_2007072EN.01004101.xml

| 29.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/41

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 March 2007

(2007/C 72/18)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3348 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4493 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67950 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3190 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6164 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,31 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1335 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5807 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,075 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,16 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7097 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8836 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3665 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,518 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8612 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6532 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5477 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4293 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8702 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0260 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 254,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7390 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3173 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3825 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 212,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6213 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,471 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6950 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,711 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3348

JPY

Japanese yen

156,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4493

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67950

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3190

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6164

ISK

Iceland króna

88,31

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1335

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5807

CZK

Czech koruna

28,075

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,16

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7097

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8836

RON

Romanian leu

3,3665

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,518

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8612

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6532

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5477

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4293

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8702

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0260

KRW

South Korean won

1 254,11

ZAR

South African rand

9,7390

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3173

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3825

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 212,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6213

PHP

Philippine peso

64,471

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6950

THB

Thai baht

42,711

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Boyce, appellant, and Boyce, respondent.

Decree unanimously affirmed. Opinion of the Chancellor (8 *C. E. Green*337) adopted as the opinion of this court.
### §2303. Promotion

Enlisted members shall be advanced in rating by the Commandant under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 520, §352; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(C), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; renumbered §2303, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §113(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4221.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Derived from title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §23 (Apr. 16, 1908, ch. 145, §8, 35 Stat. 62).

Inasmuch as all phases of promotion of enlisted men, except the points covered by title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §23, have been left to administrative control heretofore, and this has proved most satisfactory, the entire promotion of enlisted men is delegated to administrative control by this section. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 352 of this title as this section.

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted "Enlisted members" for "Enlisted men".
| **INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (Details Textual) (USD $)** | 3 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | $ 45,799       | $ 53,160 |
| Series One [Member]                                                 |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 0 |
| Series Two [Member]                                                 |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 0 |
| Series Three [Member]                                               |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 45,799         | 53,160 |
| Series Four [Member]                                                |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 0 |
| Series Five [Member]                                                |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 0 |
| Series Six [Member]                                                 |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | $ 0            | $ 0 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of income loss not recognized under equity method accounting.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**bctc_IncomeLossNotRecognizedUnderEquityMethodAccounting**Namespace Prefix:**bctc_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
### §5108. Unfunded priorities list

(a) In General.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress a budget pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Commandant shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a list of each unfunded priority for the Coast Guard.

(b) Prioritization.—The list required under subsection (a) shall present the unfunded priorities in order from the highest priority to the lowest, as determined by the Commandant.

(c) Unfunded Priority Defined.—In this section, the term "unfunded priority" means a program or mission requirement that—

(1) has not been selected for funding in the applicable proposed budget;

(2) is necessary to fulfill a requirement associated with an operational need; and

(3) the Commandant would have recommended for inclusion in the applicable proposed budget had additional resources been available or had the requirement emerged before the budget was submitted.

(Added Pub. L. 115–282, title III, §317(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4251.)
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUANTUM ACTIVITIES
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Labor Relations Board

# TIME AND DATES:

All meetings are held at 2:30 p.m.

Tuesday, March 1;

Wednesday, March 2;

Thursday, March 3;

Tuesday, March 8;

Wednesday, March 9;

Thursday, March 10;

Tuesday, March 15;

Wednesday, March 16;

Thursday, March 17;

Tuesday, March 22;

Wednesday, March 23;

Thursday, March 24;

Tuesday, March 29;

Wednesday, March 30;

Thursday, March 31.

# PLACE:

Board Agenda Room, No. 11820, 1099 14th St., NW., Washington, DC 20570.

*Status:*                         Closed.                    

*Matters To Be Considered:*                         Pursuant to § 102.139(a) of the Board's Rules and Regulations, the Board or a panel thereof will consider “the issuance of a subpoena, the Board's participation in a civil action or proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or disposition * * * of particular representation or unfair labor practice proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of the [National Labor Relations] Act, or any court proceedings collateral or ancillary thereto.”                         *See*                         also 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10).                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Henry S. Breiteneicher, Associate Executive Secretary, (202) 273-2917.

 Dated: March 2, 2011.

Henry S. Breiteneicher,

Associate Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-5083 Filed 3-2-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
#### State Automobile Insurance Association et al. *v.*Ellingwood et al.

[No. 12,109.

Filed November 6, 1925.]

From Hamilton Circuit Court; *Fred E. Hines,*Judge.

Action between the State Automobile Insurance Association and others and Mamie Ellingwood and others. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*Fenton, Steers, Herbst & Klee, Gentry, Cloe & Campbell*and *Kemp, Kemp.& Russell,*for appellants.-

*Ellison & Neff*and *Thomas E. Kane,*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.
120 STAT. 3572 PUBLIC LAW 109–477—JAN. 12, 2007

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4997:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–715 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Dec. 6, considered and passed House.

Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–477

109th Congress

An Act

To extend for 2 years the authority to grant waivers of the foreign country residence

requirement with respect to certain international medical graduates.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Physicians for Underserved

Areas Act’’.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF FOREIGN COUNTRY RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT

WITH RESPECT TO INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES.

Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Technical

Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note; Public Law 103–

416) (as amended by section 1(a)(1) of Public Law 108–441) is

amended by striking ‘‘June 1, 2006.’’ and inserting ‘‘June 1, 2008.’’.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect as if enacted

on May 31, 2006.

Approved January 12, 2007.

8 USC 1182 note.

8 USC 1101 note.

Physicians for

Underserved

Areas Act.

Jan. 12, 2007

[H.R. 4997]
# C_2007096EN.01001602.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 April 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-141/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/65/EC - Financial services - Distance marketing - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2007/C 96/27)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Aresu and R. Vidal Puig, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M.A. Sampol Pucurull, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, as regards financial services other than private insurance, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC (OJ 2002 L 271, p. 16)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, as regards financial services other than private insurance, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, as regards financial services other than private insurance, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 121 of 20.5.2006.

1

---
### §543. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–258, §5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068

Section, act Dec. 21, 1905, ch. 3, §1, 34 Stat. 5, related to tax on circulating notes secured by Panama Canal 2 per centum bonds and rights and privileges of such bonds.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 379 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 379

   Recognizing and commending the personnel of Eglin Air Force Base, 
 Florida, for their participation and efforts in support of the North 
  Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Operation Allied Force in the 
                             Balkan region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 1999

Mr. Scarborough submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing and commending the personnel of Eglin Air Force Base, 
 Florida, for their participation and efforts in support of the North 
  Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Operation Allied Force in the 
                             Balkan region.

Whereas the personnel of the Air Armament Center at Eglin Air Force Base, 
        Florida, developed and provided many of the munitions, technical orders, 
        expertise, and support equipment utilized by NATO during the Operation 
        Allied Force air campaign;
Whereas the 2,000-pound Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) developed at the Air 
        Armament Center was the very first weapon dropped in Operation Allied 
        Force;
Whereas the Air to Ground 130 (AGM 130) standoff missile, developed at the Air 
        Armament Center, enabled the F-15E Strike Eagle air crews to standoff 
        approximately 40 nautical miles from targets and attack with very high 
        precision; and
Whereas the reliable performance of the JDAM and AGM 130 enabled the combat air 
        crews to complete bombing missions accurately, effectively, and with 
        reduced risk to crews, resulting in no casualties among NATO air 
        personnel, thereby making these munitions the ordinance favored most by 
        combat air crews: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the men and women of Eglin Air Force Base, 
        Florida, for their contributions to the unqualified success of 
        Operation Allied Force;
            (2) recognizes that the efforts of the men and women of the 
        Air Armament Center, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, helped NATO 
        conduct the air war with devastating effect on our adversaries, 
        entirely without American casualties in the air combat 
        operations;
            (3) expresses deep gratitude for the sacrifices made by 
        those men and women and their families in their support of 
        American efforts in Operation Allied Force; and
            (4) commits to maintaining the technological superiority of 
        American air armament as a critical component of our Nation's 
        capability to conduct and prevail in warfare while minimizing 
        casualties.
                                 <all>
```
§ 580.8 What will the Commission's final decision contain? The Commission may affirm, modify, or reverse, in whole or in part, the Chair's decision or the presiding official's recommended decision, or may remove a certificate of self-regulation, and will state the bases of its decision. The final decision will be in writing and will include: ( a ) A statement of findings and conclusions, with the bases for them on all material issues of fact, law, or discretion;
( b ) A ruling on each material issue; and
( c ) An appropriate grant or denial of relief.