alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

 AIR AND RADIATION 

Date: August 27, 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: EO12866 Review-Interagency Review Material 2017-2025 Vehicle GHG and Fuel 

Economy Standard and FRM 2060 AQ54 

FROM: Anthony Neam, Assessment and Standards Division 

TO: EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

This memorandum is just to point to the attached PDF files documenting interagency 

communication per EO12866.
1 The Honorable Nancy C. Dreher, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2 The Honorable Michael James Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. ___________ No. 95-3377

___________ In re: Sharon N. Gunberg, * * Debtor. * _______________________________ * * Minneapolis Community * Appeal from the United States Development Agency, * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Appellee, * * [UNPUBLISHED] v. * * Sharon N. Gunberg, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 14, 1996 Filed: August 15, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Sharon N. Gunberg sought relief under the Bankruptcy Laws. The Minneapolis Community Development Agency filed a complaint objecting to Gunberg's discharge. In the ensuing adversary proceeding, the Bankruptcy Court 1 denied Gunberg's discharge. Gunberg appealed to the District Court, 2 which affirmed the judgment of the Bankruptcy Court. Gunberg now appeals to this-2- Court, arguing that the Bankruptcy Court erred in several respects and that the decision of the District Court should be reversed. Having considered all of Gunberg's arguments, we conclude that the Bankruptcy Court committed no error of law, that the District Court's decision affirming the Bankruptcy Court is correct, and that an opinion by this Court would lack precedential value. Accordingly, the decision of the District Court is affirmed without further discussion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 700.837 Confidentiality of archaeological resource information. The Federal Land Manager shall not make available to the public under subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5 of the United States Code or any other provisions of law, information concerning the nature and location of any archaeological resource, with the following exceptions: ( a ) The Federal Land Manager may make information available, provided that the disclosure will further the purposes of the Act and this part, or the Act of June 27, 1960, as amended (16 U.S.C. 469-469c) without risking harm to the archaeological resource or to the site in which it is located.
( b ) With the concurrence of the Navajo Nation, the Federal Land Manager shall make information available, when the Governor of any State has submitted to the Federal Land Manager a written request for information concerning the archaeological resources within the requesting Governor's state; provided that the request includes: ( 1 ) The specific archaeological resource or area about which information is sought.
( 2 ) The purpose for which the information is sought; and
( 3 ) The Governor's written commitment to adequately protect the confidentiality of the information.
WALDEN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
             SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

                                                        Percentage
Subsidiaries                                         Equity Ownership
------------                                         ----------------
WDN Properties, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100%
(New York)

Walden Special Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100%
(Texas)

Chimney Trace Special Corp.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100%
(Texas)

Walden Operating, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100%
(Delaware)

Walden Glen Corporation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100%
(Delaware)

Walden AZ Corporation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100%
(Delaware)

Crossing and Meadows Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100%
(Texas)

Resident Profiles, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100%
(Texas)
EX-10.36 FOUNDERS PERFORMANCE AWARD NOTIFICATION






Exhibit 10.36



Dear Thomas,




I am extremely pleased to inform you that as of June 20th, 2005, the first tranche of
the Founders Award Program has now vested. You will recall that the award was to vest when the
Novelis closing share price attained a price of $23.57, (which was an 8% share price improvement
from the date of the grant of the award by the Novelis board) and then held that price for a
minimum of 15 consecutive trading days. This has now occurred! It is important to remember that
this grant is designed to align Senior Management and the Novelis shareholder and as such will now,
following the vesting of the award, track the share price of the Novelis shares until it is paid in
cash on or about March 24, 2006.



The initial component for you personally concerning the first tranche of the award is 3,950
Performance Share Units (PSUs) which based on a June 20, 2005 closing price of $25.13 has a value
of $93,102. The value of the PSUs, will now depend on the closing share price of Novelis shares on
March 17, 20, 21, 22 and 23, 2006; the average closing price for this five consecutive trading day
period will set the price for the Novelis PSUs to be converted into a cash payment to you on or
about March 24, 2006. (Example: If the Novelis closing share price average for the five days in
March of 2006 would be $30.00, then your value would increase to $118,500 ($30.00 x 3,950 =
$118,500). If the value would decline to $20.00, then your value would be $79,000 ($20.00 x 3,950
= $79,000).



This is, of course, the first tranche of the Founders Award Grant. Your second tranche amount is
6,000 additional PSUs and would trigger with a closing share price of $25.31 (a second 8% increase
over the initial grant level) being attained between March 24, 2006 and March 23, 2008 and which
must be sustained for a period of 15 consecutive trading days. The value of those PSUs at the
trigger price of $25.31 would be $99,975. The process after vesting would be identical in process
to that described above with the payout values of the PSUs set by the Novelis share price prior to
the payout. This would then be followed by the third tranche amount listed in your award documents
and be handled in the identical fashion as the initial two tranches.



Needless to say, I am pleased to announce the vesting of this initial component of the Founders
Grant Award. Clearly the focus needs to be on continuing to drive shareholder value and we believe
this award to you will help convey this message in a personal way! The focus on results we have
held to date has driven the share price improvements which have led to this initial tranche
vesting. We must continue to keep our focus on our three key near term goals 1) Make the Plan, 2)
De-Lever the Company, and 3) Organize for Success! By doing so I am confident we can not only make
our existing shareholders pleased with their investment in us, but also attract new investors and
further improving share performance and thereby driving the additional vesting of the remainder of
this award!



Thanks for your continued support!



Brian
# C_2015034EN.01002301.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Riva Fire v Commission

(Case T-83/10) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils - Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Fixing of prices and payment terms - Limiting or controlling output or sales - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Competence of the Commission - Legal basis - Consultation of the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Monopolies - Rights of the defence - Definition of the geographical market - Application of the principle of lex mitior - Infringement of Article 65 CS - Fines - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Extenuating circumstances - Proportionality - Application of the 1996 Leniency Notice))

(2015/C 034/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Riva Fire SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, M. Pappalardo and T. Ubaldi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by R. Sauer and B. Gencarelli, and subsequently by R. Sauer and R. Striani, acting as Agents, assisted by M. Moretto, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Primarily, application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 7492 final of 30 September 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 65 CS (Case COMP/37.956 — Reinforcing bars, readoption), as amended by Commission Decision C(2009) 9912 final of 8 December 2009, and in the alternative application for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Fixes the amount of the fine imposed on Riva Fire SpA at EUR 2 6 0 93  000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Fixes the amount of the fine imposed on Riva Fire SpA at EUR 2 6 0 93  000;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Riva Fire to bear its own costs and to pay three-quarters of the costs incurred by the European Commission; orders the Commission to bear one-quarter of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Riva Fire to bear its own costs and to pay three-quarters of the costs incurred by the European Commission; orders the Commission to bear one-quarter of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1094

To require a school to forward certain information regarding transferring

students.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 20, 1999

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To require a school to forward certain information regarding

transferring students.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INFORMATION REGARDING TRANSFERRING

4 STUDENTS.

5 Subpart 4 of part C of the General Education Provi6 sions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232f et seq.) is amended by adding

7 at the end the following:
2

•S 1094 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 447. INFORMATION REGARDING TRANSFERRING STU2 DENTS.

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Each public or private elemen4 tary school or secondary school that receives Federal

5 funds, not later than 10 days after the school receives no6 tice of a student’s intent to transfer to another school,

7 shall provide to the school to which the student is transfer8 ring a statement indicating whether the student is in good

9 standing.

10 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION OF IN GOOD STANDING.—In this

11 section the term ‘in good standing’, when used with re12 spect to a student, means that the student is eligible to

13 attend class at the school from which the student is trans14 ferring and is not subject to a period of suspension or an

15 expulsion from the school.

16 ‘‘(c) SPECIAL RULES.—If a student has been sus17 pended or expelled for knowingly possessing a weapon in

18 a school building or on school grounds, for knowingly pos19 sessing, selling, or delivering an illegal drug in a school

20 building or on school grounds, or for battering a staff

21 member of the school, and the period of the suspension

22 or expulsion has not expired, then—

23 ‘‘(1) the statement described in subsection (a)

24 shall include the date and duration of the suspension

25 or expulsion; and
3

•S 1094 IS

1 ‘‘(2) the student shall not be allowed to attend

2 class in an elementary school or secondary school

3 that receives Federal funds until the student serves

4 the entire period of the suspension or expulsion.

5 ‘‘(d) FORM.—The Secretary shall develop a one page

6 standard form for schools to use in providing the state7 ment described in subsection (a).’’.

Æ
## A **TTACHMENT E**  **PESP Membership Application**  Note: The form below is a reproduction of a form that was developed for online use. Paperwork Reduction Act Notice: The paperwork burden for the PESP Membership Application form is estimated to average 2 hours per response, including time for reading the instructions, gat hering and maintaining information, and completing the form . Responses to this collection of information are necessary in order to participate in the voluntary program. A n agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden , to the Director, Collection Strategies Division (2822T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; and to OMB, addressed to Desk Officer for EPA, via email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov . Do not send completed forms to these addresses. By completing this application for membership in PESP, we affirm our commitment to the following: We believe that environmental stewardship is an integral part of pest management practices and will continue to work toward pest management practices that reduce the risks to humans and the environment. As part of our voluntary participation in the Pesticide Environmental Stewardship Program, this organization will develop a Strategic Approach to pesticide risk reduction and implement annual Activities that fall within this Strategic Approach. We understand that in return, the U.S. Environmental Protection Ag ency will seek to foster, fund and promote, through research, education, and other means, the adoption of alternative pest management technologies and practices that enhance pest management and reduce pesticide risk.
* = required Contact Type * Salutatio n * First Name * Last Name * Company* Title * Email * Pr im ary --None- -Phone * (number only - no dashes or spaces)

Fax (number only - no dashes or spaces)

Address * City * State/Province * Zip * Industry* Secondary Contact Information

Overview & Mission of Your Organization * Please provide an overview of your organization (e.g., history and size, nature of services offered, number of customers or acres managed, environmental/IPM activities and/or certifications, etc.) and your environmental stewar dship mission. How do your organization’s activities and mission currently relate to IPM? (Maximum length: 10,000 characters)

Why are you interested in joining PESP? * Please explain your organization's interest in joining PESP. How do you hope to be eng aged as a PESP member, and what do you hope to gain from PESP membership? Please also let us know how you heard about PESP. If you were referred by an existing PESP member or partner, please provide the individual's name.(Maximum length: 10,000 characters)

--None- -OMB Control No. 2070 - 0188 EPA Form No. 

### 9600 - 02 Approval Expires XX - XX - XXXX S ubm itA ppl ic ation
Exhibit 13.2

GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Salvi Rafael Folch Viadero, the Chief Financial Officer of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Companys annual report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 6, 2014



By:

/s/ Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoName: Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoTitle: Chief Financial Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 106

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 to deauthorize

the remainder of the project at East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1996

to deauthorize the remainder of the project at East

Boothbay Harbor, Maine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEAUTHORIZATION OF REMAINDER OF

4 PROJECT AT EAST BOOTHBAY HARBOR,

5 MAINE.

6 Section 364 of the Water Resources Development Act

7 of 1996 (110 Stat. 3731) is amended by striking para8 graph (9) and inserting the following:
2

•S 106 IS

1 ‘‘(9) EAST BOOTHBAY HARBOR, MAINE.—The

2 project for navigation, East Boothbay Harbor,

3 Maine, authorized by the first section of the Act en4 titled ‘‘An Act making appropriations for the con5 struction, repair, and preservation of certain public

6 works on rivers and harbors, and for other pur7 poses’’, approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 657).’’.

Æ
About GPO|Newsroom/Media|Congressional Relations|Inspector General|Careers|Contact|askGPO|Help

Home|Customers|Vendors|Libraries
Exhibit 32.b

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
#### § 381.26 Separation of establishments.

Each official establishment shall be separate and distinct from any other official establishment and from any unofficial establishment except an establishment preparing meat products under the Federal Meat Inspection Act or under State meat inspection. Further, doorways, or other openings, may be permitted between establishments at the discretion of the Administrator and under such conditions as he may prescribe.
-  About RD                  -  Key Priorities                    -  Priority Points Program Chart 
                -  Rural Development Priorities: FY 2023 
                -  Rural Development Priorities: FY 2024 
              -  History 
              -  Farm Bill 
              -  Grant Awards 
              -  Careers at Rural Development                    -  Current Job Opportunities 
              -  Rural Data Gateway 
              -  Leadership                    -  Under Secretary  
                -  Deputy Under Secretary 
                -  Chief Operating Officer 
                -  Administrators 
                -  State Directors 
              -  Agencies                    -   Rural Business-Cooperative Service                      -  Rural Business-Cooperative Service Contacts 
                -   Rural Housing Service                      -  Rural Housing Service Contacts 
                -   Rural Utilities Service                      -  Rural Utilities Service Contacts 
              -  Offices                    -  Business Center 
                -  Civil Rights                       -  Civil Rights Contacts 
                  -  Equal Employment Opportunity Branch 
                  -  Program Compliant Processing and Resolution Branch 
                  -  Program Compliance and Training Branch 
                  -  Posters 
                  -  Civil Rights Training 
                  -  Limited English Proficiency 
                  -  Civil Rights Library 
                  -  Accessibility Statement 
                -  External Affairs 
                -  Innovation Center                      -  Innovation Center Divisions 
                -  Risk Office 
                -  State Offices 
                -  Servicing Office 
              -  Initiatives                    -  Healthy Food Financing Initiative 
                -  Interagency Working Group on Cooperative Development                      -  Partners                        -  Federal 
                    -  Tribal 
                    -  State & Local 
                    -  Private Sector 
                  -  Funding Resources                        -  Grant Funding 
                    -  Equity Capital 
                    -  Loans and Guaranteed Loans 
                    -  Revolving Loan Funds 
                    -  Crowd Sourcing 
                    -  Technical Assistance 
                    -  Other 
                  -  Development Tools 
                  -  Publications & Information 
                -  Promise Zones 
                -  Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) 
                -  Rural Placemaking 
                -  Substantially Underserved Trust Area (SUTA) 
              -  Tribal Relations                    -  Tribal Relations Events
## Browse All Stories

### New Capacity for Sunrise County: USDA Helps Meet Business Needs

[Read More]

02.29.2024

BusinessEconomic DevelopmentGrantsUnderserved

### Slam Dunk for Poodunck: Safer, Eco-friendly Trail Grooming Machine

[Read More]

02.29.2024

RecreationUnderserved

### Rural Development Assisting Female Vets Down East

[Read More]

02.16.2024

Underserved

### USDA Rural Development Helps Rural School District Provide More than Education to Communities

[Read More]

01.08.2024

Community FacilitiesEducationTechnologyUnderserved

### Equipment upgrades improve response, community relations in Roberts County

[Read More]

08.09.2023

Community FacilitiesFirst RespondersRural DevelopmentUnderserved

### Herreid Homes Have New Hope After Rehab

[Read More]

06.23.2023

Home RepairHomeownershipHomeownership Month 2023HousingUnderserved

### Rural Development Helped Her Own a Home: She's Now Kauai's Habitat for Humanity Executive Director

[Read More]

06.23.2023

GrantsHomeownership Month 2023Underserved

### Partnerships help ease financial burden for homeowners

[Read More]

06.22.2023

GrantsHomeownership Month 2023Underserved

### Home Care Cooperative Training Meets Pressing Need in Rural Nebraska 

[Read More]

06.14.2023

CooperativesGrantsHealth CareUnderserved

### USDA Rural Development celebrates Chugachmiut Regional Health Center groundbreaking

[Read More]

06.05.2023

Community FacilitiesGrantsHealth CareInfrastructureRural DevelopmentTribalUnderserved

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
- …
-              4           
-   Next
### §2163. Removal of officer from active duty; action by Secretary

The Secretary may remove an officer from active duty if his removal is recommended by a board of review under section 2160 of this title. The Secretary's action in such as case is final and conclusive.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 189, §326; renumbered §2163 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2160" for "section 323".

Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 326 of this title as this section.