alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 116.9 Recording and reporting adverse events. ( a ) Licensees and permittees must maintain a detailed record for every adverse event report the licensee or permittee receives for any biological product it produces or distributes. These records shall be maintained for a period of 3 years after the date the adverse event report is received. The adverse event report form and guidance on how to complete it, including guidance specific to the various information blocks on the form, is available on the APHIS website at *https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/veterinary-biologics* or by writing to APHIS Center for Veterinary Biologics, 1920 Dayton Avenue, P.O. Box 844, Ames, Iowa 50010.
( b ) A report of all adverse events reports received by a licensee or permittee must be compiled and submitted to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. The frequency of report submission is as follows: ( 1 ) Immediate notification is required if at any time there are indications that raise questions regarding the purity, safety, potency, or efficacy of a product, or if it appears that there may be a problem regarding the preparation, testing, or distribution of a product.
( 2 ) Adverse event reports determined by the licensee or permittee to be product-related, serious, and unexpected must also be reported immediately.
( 3 ) All other adverse event reports must be reported within 90 calendar days of the date the report was first received.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0209) [83 FR 22836, May 17, 2018]
### §41. Guam; extension of National Bank Act

The National Bank Act [12 U.S.C. 21 et seq.], and all other Acts of Congress relating to national banks, shall, insofar as not locally inapplicable after August 1, 1956, apply to Guam.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 852, §2, 70 Stat. 908.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Bank Act, referred to in text, is act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, 13 Stat. 99, which is classified principally to chapter 2 (§21 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 38 of this title.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3



PRESS RELEASE

|                              |  |                            
|----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|For Immediate Release         |  | October 18, 2002           
|For More Information Contact: |  | Jeff Peterson, 636-519-6607

J. P. Morgan Partners Acquires Brand Services

NEW YORK and ST LOUIS, MISSOURI, October 18, 2002  J.P. Morgan Partners, the
private equity affiliate of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., announced its acquisition
of Brand Services from DLJ Merchant Banking for approximately $500 million. A
senior notes offering of $150 million was completed in association with the
transaction. The transaction closed on October 16, 2002.

Brand is the largest North American provider of scaffolding services,
participating in both the industrial scaffolding segment and the commercial
scaffolding segment. Brand principally provides its industry services in the
refining, petrochemical, chemical, and electric utility industries. Brands
commercial scaffolding segment primarily serves the non-residential
construction and renovation markets. Brand provides its customers with turnkey
solutions including equipment rental, skilled labor for the erection and
dismantlement of scaffolding, and scaffolding design services. Brands
existing management team will remain in place and the Company will continue to
operate out of its St. Louis, Missouri headquarters.

John Monter, President and CEO of Brand, said, We look forward to working with
the J.P. Morgan Partners team to further increase the size and scope of our
business. We remain committed to providing our customers with the service,
safety, reliability, and professional approach to which they have become
accustomed. I want to thank all of Brands team members for their focus and
dedication to our business through this process.

Christopher Behrens, a General Partner of J.P. Morgan Partners, said, Under
the guidance of the current management, Brand has clearly established itself as
the market leader of the scaffolding industry. J.P. Morgan Partners
acquisition of Brand is consistent with our strategy of investing in market
leading companies with outstanding management teams. We look forward to working
with the Brand team to further strengthen the Companys market position.

J.P. Morgan Partners (JPMP) is a global partnership with over $30 billion in
total capital under management. It is a leading provider of private equity and
has closed over 1,800 individual transactions since its inception in 1984.
JPMP has more than 150 investment professionals in nine offices throughout the
world. J.P. Morgan Partners primary limited partner is J.P. Morgan Chase &
Co. (NYSE: JPM), one of the largest financial institutions in the United
States. For additional information, please visit our website at
www.jpmorganpartners.com.

Since 1996, Brand Services has been owned by DLJ Merchant Banking, Carlisle
Enterprises, Waste Management, and the Brand management team.

Credit Suisse First Boston acted as financial advisor to Brand.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 102

To provide that the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House

of Representatives shall include an estimate of Federal retirement benefits for each Member of Congress in their semiannual reports, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. ABRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To provide that the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk

of the House of Representatives shall include an estimate

of Federal retirement benefits for each Member of Congress in their semiannual reports, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE OF ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL RE4 TIREMENT BENEFITS OF MEMBERS OF CON5 GRESS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 105(a) of the Legislative

7 Branch Appropriations Act, 1965 (2 U.S.C. 104a; Public
2

•S 102 IS

1 Law 88–454; 78 Stat. 550) is amended by adding at the

2 end the following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(4) The Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of

4 the House of Representatives shall include in each semi5 annual report submitted under paragraph (1), with re6 spect to Members of Congress, as applicable—

7 ‘‘(A) the total amount of individual contribu8 tions made by each Member to the Civil Service Re9 tirement and Disability Fund and the Thrift Savings

10 Fund under chapters 83 and 84 of title 5, United

11 States Code, for all Federal service performed by the

12 Member as a Member of Congress and as a Federal

13 employee;

14 ‘‘(B) an estimate of the annuity each Member

15 would be entitled to receive under chapters 83 and

16 84 of such title based on the earliest possible date

17 to receive annuity payments by reason of retirement

18 (other than disability retirement) which begins after

19 the date of expiration of the term of office such

20 Member is serving; and

21 ‘‘(C) any other information necessary to enable

22 the public to accurately compute the Federal retire23 ment benefits of each Member based on various as24 sumptions of years of service and age of separation

25 from service by reason of retirement.’’.
3

•S 102 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect

2 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
-  Home 
-  Training 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Outreach & Engagement 
                      -  Training Requirements for Industry 
                      -  Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG) 
                      -  Workshops 
                      -  Webinars 
                      -  Community Liaisons (CLs) 
                      -  Publications 
                      -  Publicaciones (en español) 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  Training Modules 
                      -  Videos and Mobile Apps 
                      -  Contact Us 

# Lithium Battery Test Summaries (TS)

Test Summary Brochure web.pdf (1.34 MB)

For safety reasons, lithium batteries must be subjected to a series of design tests per sub-section 38.3 of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria. This updated publication assists manufacturers and distributors with understanding and implementing the lithium battery test summary requirement effective January 1, 2022.
ICP Solar Technologies, Inc.: Exhibit 10.10 - Prepared by TNT Filings
   Inc.




  




Exhibit 10.10

SASS PERESS 
c/o ICP
Solar Technologies, Inc. 
7075 Place Robert-Joncas 
Montreal, Quebec,
Canada H4M 2Z2 

June 13, 2008 

 

Platinum Long Term Growth VI, LLC 
152 West 57th
Street, 4th Floor 
New York, NY 10019 

BridgePointe Master Fund Ltd. 
1120 Sanctuary Parkway

Suite 325 
Alpharetta, GA 30004 

Roswell Capital Partners, LLC 
1120 Sanctuary Parkway

Suite 325 
Alpharetta, GA 30004 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

I am the President and CEO of ICP Solar Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 13,
2008 (the “Purchase Agreement”), among you and the Company, you are purchasing
the securities identified therein. 

As of the date hereof, I beneficially own an aggregate of
[18,290,311 shares of Common Stock of the Company, and hold sole voting power
(whether directly or via instruction to Equity Transfer and Trust Company) over
such shares. As an inducement for you to purchase the securities identified in
the Purchase Agreement, I hereby agree to vote or to cause to be voted all such
shares in favor of any amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation
or other governing documents necessary to ensure the Company’s compliance with
its obligations under Section 4(e) of the Purchase Agreement for avoidance of
doubt, this agreement to vote, or cause to vote, is limited for the purpose of
ensuring compliance with the Company’s obligations under Section 4(e) of the
Purchase Agreement. To the extent any of the shares identified above are
transferred to an affiliate, any of my family members or an affiliate of any of
my family members, as a condition to such transfer, such transferee shall agree
to vote such shares in accordance with this letter agreement. Further, to the
extent I acquire, directly or indirectly, any additional shares of Common Stock
of the Company, such additional shares shall be voted in accordance with the
terms of this letter agreement. 

I hereby acknowledge and agree that any investment made by you
pursuant to the Purchase Agreement is beneficial to my interests as an officer
and affiliate of the Company, that I have




received sufficient consideration for the delivery of this
letter agreement and, but for this letter agreement, you would not make such
investment.

Sincerely, 


Sass Peress
§ 9033.12 Production of computerized information. ( a ) *Categories of computerized information to be provided.* If the candidate or the candidate's authorized committee maintains or uses computerized information containing any of the categories of data listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(9) of this section, the committee shall provide digital storage devices, containing the computerized information at the times specified in 11 CFR 9038.1(b)(1): ( 1 ) Information required by law to be maintained regarding the committee's receipts or disbursements;
( 2 ) Records of allocations of expenditures to particular state expenditure limits and to the overall expenditure limit;
( 3 ) Disbursements for exempt fundraising and exempt compliance costs, including the allocation of salaries and overhead expenditures;
( 4 ) Records of allocations of expenditures for the purchase of broadcast media;
( 5 ) Records used to prepare statements of net outstanding campaign obligations;
( 6 ) Records used to reconcile bank statements;
( 7 ) Disbursements made and reimbursements received for the cost of transportation, ground services and facilities made available to media personnel, including records relating to how costs charged to media personnel were determined;
( 8 ) Records relating to the acquisition, use and disposition of capital assets or other assets; and
( 9 ) Any other information that may be used during the Commission's audit to review the committee's receipts, disbursements, loans, debts, obligations, bank reconciliations or statements of net outstanding campaign obligations.
( b ) *Additional materials and assistance.* Upon request, the committee shall provide records explaining the computer system's software capabilities, such as user guides, technical manuals, formats, layouts and other materials for processing and analyzing the information requested. Upon request, the committee shall also make available such personnel as are necessary to explain the operation of the computer system's software and the computerized information prepared or maintained by the committee.
[56 FR 35930, July 29, 1991, as amended at 89 FR 220, Jan. 2, 2024]
# C_2007100EN.01000102.xml

| 4.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4528 — GSW/MVV/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 100/02)

On 13 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4528. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4528. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
### SUBCHAPTER V—MISCELLANEOUS
Exhibit 21

                            Foamex International Inc.
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                                December 31, 1999


                                               State or Other Jurisdiction
Subsidiaries                                           of Incorporation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Espumas Foamex Espana, S.L.                               Spain
FMXI, Inc.                                                Delaware
Foamex Asia, Inc.                                         New York
Foamex Aviation, Inc.                                     Delaware
Foamex Canada Inc.                                        Canada
Foamex Capital Corporation                                Delaware
Foamex Carpet Cushion, Inc.                               Delaware
Foamex Corporation                                        Delaware
Foamex Delaware, Inc.                                     Delaware
Foamex de Acuna, S.A. de C.V.                             Mexico
Foamex de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                            Mexico
Foamex de Cuautitlan, S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico
Foamex de Juarez, S.A. de C.V.                            Mexico
Foamex Latin America, Inc.                                Delaware
Foamex L.P.                                               Delaware
Foamex Mexico, Inc.                                       Delaware
Foamex Mexico II, Inc.                                    Delaware
Foamex-JPS Capital Corporation                            Delaware
Grupo Foamex de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                      Mexico
JPSGP Inc.                                                Delaware
Servicios Administrativos Foamex, S.A. de C.V.            Mexico
<PAGE>

                                                           EXHIBIT 3.2a

                    FIRST AMENDED TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
                                    BYLAWS
                                      OF
                       ALEXANDER HAAGEN PROPERTIES, INC.

     As of August 12, 1996, Article III, Section 2 of the Amended and Restated
Bylaws of Alexander Haagen Properties, Inc., shall be amended to read as
follows:

     "Section 2.  Number and Qualifications.  The number of directors shall be
                  -------------------------
ten, which number may be increased or decreased, but not to less than seven, nor
more than thirteen.  The number of directors may be increased or decreased by an
amendment to these Bylaws, provided, however, that the tenure of office of a
director shall not be affected by any decrease in the number of directors.  Each
director shall be a stockholder, a citizen of the United States or a resident of
the State of Maryland."

                                      -7-
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  Publications             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeCareersVeteran

**WHAT ELSE DO I NEED TO KNOW TO QUALIFY FOR VRA AS A PFPA POLICE OFFICER?**

You must demonstrate at least one (1) year of law enforcement and/or security experience on your resume.

If separating from Active Duty, you will need a Statement of Service Letter showing your separation date and type of discharge.

Retired members of the Armed Forces are required to wait at least 180 days before being appointed to a civilian position in DOD.

You’re a veteran who has much to offer. Why choose PFPA?

 

 

PFPA Officers, who are U.S. military veterans, describe how they joined the team.

Over 60% of Pentagon Police Officers are veterans.Many of them applied under the VRA program.

 

 

Officer David Ratliff, U.S. Army veteran, and others explain howeasy the VRA process was for them to join the Agency.

From the Chief

 

 

Pentagon Police Chief Woody Kusse explains whymilitary veterans are a valued asset at PFPA.

Discover how you can begin a challenging and rewarding career by contacting one of our recruiters today.

703-571-8000

PFPA.RECRUITMENT@MAIL.MIL

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 332.12 Transition grants. ( a ) Transition grants are funds that a State participating in a cooperative interstate shipment program under this part may apply for to reimburse selected establishments in the State for the cost to train one individual in the seven HACCP principles for meat or poultry processing as required under § 417.7 of this chapter and associated training in the development of sanitation standard operating procedures required under part 416 of this chapter.
( b ) A State participating in a cooperative interstate shipment program that receives a transition grant must use grant funds to reimburse the training costs of one employee per each selected establishment in the State. Any other use of such funds is prohibited.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Jeffery Love, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59547;

First District (3rd Division)

December 5, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Saul H. Brauner and Richard D. Kharas, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago'(Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., Jerome Charles Randolph, and John T. Theis, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM.
#### Hou-Ching Chou, Respondent, v Jason Wong, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 436]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated May 5, 2006, which denied his motion for summaiy judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The defendant Jason Wong established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that, after the plaintiff Hou-Ching Chou brought his vehicle to a stop *643at the stop sign controlling the plaintiffs direction of traffic, the plaintiff proceeded into the intersection directly into the path of the defendant’s oncoming vehicle, which he saw approaching *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 [a]; *Friedberg v Citiwide Auto Leasing, Inc.,*22 AD3d 522 [2005]; *Ishak v Guzman,*12 AD3d 409 [2004]; *Morgan v Hachmann,*9 AD3d 400 [2004]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiffs contention that the defendant was speeding is speculative and unsupported by any competent evidence *(see McNamara v Fishkowitz,*18 AD3d 721 [2005]; *Mora v Garcia,*3 AD3d 478, 479 [2004]; *Meretskaya v Logozzo,*2 AD3d 599 [2003]; *Breslin v Rudden,*291 AD2d 471 [2002]).

Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted. Santucci, J.E, Krausman, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.