alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010246EN.01003502.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/35

---

Action brought on 27 July 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-374/10)

()

2010/C 246/60

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and M. Sundén, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for implementing the Directive expired on 3 August 2009.

---

(1)  OJ 2007 L 184, p. 17.

1

---
Date: August 31, 2015 

Meeting: Blue Gr·een Alliance Meeting Re: Methane 

Rule(s) Discussed: f'J\e_ -\"'c'-r"\ e_ 

Written Materials? ves@ 

Name Organization 

usc.J 

Phone N umber 

( 

_ J__c Q 'U · +-\ ..:........: ./\'--------1----'-- \?____!_A-____:___ __ -----.!::....._ 'J_o l. ~ 3 ~ 3.:.. 4 (:; & tJ( 

;ll t? \ d :> c, LJ.e ,· 1D 2 - J '"1 '3 -ci ~q 7 

'Z t-- 5~<-( -y~ 'ke . - -
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Benefits 
-  Required Beginning Date 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Required Beginning Date

## Deadline to Start Your Benefit

### Participants

If you earned a pension benefit in a PBGC-trusteed pension plan, you may start to take it as soon as you are eligible under the plan’s rules. However, you ***must***start taking your benefit no later than your required beginning date. Required beginning dates are set by Congress and enforced under Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules.

Your required beginning date depends on the year you were born. You must start your benefit by April 1 of the year following the year when you reach age:
                          - 70 1⁄2 , if you were born on or before June 30, 1949
                          - 72 , if you were born July 1, 1949-December 31, 1950
                          - 73 , if you were born 1951-1959 1
                          - 75 , if you were born 1960 or later

If you have a benefit under PBGC's Missing Participants Program, these required beginning dates also apply to you.

If your required beginning date has passed and you haven’t started your benefit, please contact PBGC right away to apply for your benefit. PBGC will send you a reminder shortly before your required beginning date.

1 If you were born in 1959, please note: The law is unclear as to whether you must start your benefit at age 73 or age 75. Congress is expected to clarify in a technical correction before 2032.

### Surviving Spouses and Beneficiaries

Different rules apply to the surviving spouse or beneficiary of the person who earned the benefit, called the participant.

If the participant dies before starting their benefit or before their required beginning date:

#### Surviving spouses

You must start your benefit ***either*** by December 1 of the year after the participant dies ***or*** by December 1 of the year when the participant reached mandatory retirement age, ***whichever is later***.

#### Non-spouse beneficiaries

You must start your benefit by December 1 of the year after the participant dies.

March 13, 2024
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nomadic Collaboration International,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ricardo Garcia de Paredes Carbone, Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Executive Officer and President, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                              |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: May 12, 2002                                                                           |  | 
|                                                                                              |  | 
|/s/ Ricardo Garcia de Paredes Carbone                                                         |  | 
|                                                                                              |  | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, and
Principal Accounting Officer |  |
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

John
C. Batty, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affymetrix, Inc. certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



March 2, 2009

/s/ JOHN C. BATTYName:

John C. BattyTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Williams. Renee (OST) l)G(±d ])01^aST' Mfj- 'I'Sl'f 

Subject: FW: Chisana essential air 

From: Darcy Etcheverry [mailto:darcyetcheverry@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 8:30 AM 

To: Little, Cynthia M (DOT) 

Subject: Chisana essential air 

Hello, 

My husband owns property in Chisana, AK. He has been visiting there since he was a child, and I have been 

going there for 8 years. We hope to one day build a home there. Our grandparents live in Chisana, and the mail 

plane is essential for them to make a home there. It also makes visiting this remarkable place easier and more 

affordable - both for the transportation of goods and people. Please keep Chisana accessible to everyone by 

keeping essential air service. 

Thank you, 

Darcy Etcheverry 

PO Box 55550 

North Pole, AK 99705 

P: 907-460-7927
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6797

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODRIGUEZ RODNEY LOMAX NORMAN, a/k/a Roddoe, a/k/a Jeffrey Scott,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00254-LMB-2)

Submitted: December 17, 2021 Decided: January 26, 2022

Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodriguez Rodney Lomax Norman, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6797 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Rodriguez Rodney Lomax Norman, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district 

court’s orders denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 

§ 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and denying reconsideration. We review a district 

court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United 

States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have 

reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. The district court denied Norman’s 

motions after assessing the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and sufficiently 

explained its reasons for the denial. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th 

Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release 

motion). We therefore affirm the district court’s orders. We deny the motion to appoint 

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6797 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
CERTIFICATIONS  UNDER  SECTION  906


     Pursuant  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and  (b)  of  section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the  undersigned  officers  of  FTS  Group,  Inc.,  a  Nevada  corporation  (the
"Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

    The  Quarterly  Report  for  the  quarter  ended  March  31, 2004 (the "Form
10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

    Dated:  May  17,  2004

                           /s/  Scott  Gallagher
                           --------------------
                           Scott  Gallagher,  Chief  Executive  Officer


    Dated:  May  17,  2004
                           /s/  Linda  Ehlen
                           -----------------
                          Linda  Ehlen,  Chief  Financial  Officer
# C_2013252EN.01004702.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/47

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 June 2013 — Biwer and Others v Commission

(Case F-115/10) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Remuneration - Family allowances - Education allowance - Conditions for grant - Deduction of an allowance of the same type received from another source - Action manifestly unfounded)

2013/C 252/82

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Jacques Biwer and Others (Bascharage, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil Service — Action for annulment of the Commission decision to consider certain financial assistance from a Member State to students in higher education to be an allowance of the same nature as family allowances and to deduct this financial assistance from the education allowance granted to officials who are parents of those students.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action of Mr Biwer and the other five applicants whose names appear in the annex is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action of Mr Biwer and the other five applicants whose names appear in the annex is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law.

| 2. | Mr Biwer and the other five applicants whose names appear in the annex shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Biwer and the other five applicants whose names appear in the annex shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011, p. 66.

1

---
* The case is unanimously ordered submitted withoutoral argument

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The Court g enerally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and ju dgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### SEP 17 2001 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
GLENN R. STEVENS,

Petitioner - Appellant,
v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondents - Appellees. No. 01-1163 (No. 01-Z-376) (District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before EBEL , KELLY , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges. Pro se petitioner Glenn R. Stevens, a Colorado stat e prisoner, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) to challenge the district court’s denial of his petition for a w rit of habeas corpus. We conclude that Stevens has not made a substantial sh owing of the denial of a1 Colo. Const. art. V, § 18 (“The style of the laws of this state shall be:

‘Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado’.”); id. art. XVIII, § 8 (“The general assembly shall provide forthe publication of the laws passed at each session thereof.”). -2- constitutional right, § 2253(c)(2), and we deny COA
. Stevens pleaded guilty to charges of aggravated rob bery, conspiracy, and intimidation of a witness, and he is serving a termof twenty-three years imprisonment. In his habeas application, Stevens c laims that he was deprived of his rights to due process and equal protection because he was convicted under state statutes that were published in the Colorado Revised Statutes without an enacting clause. While it is true that the Colorad o Constitution requires inclusion of an enacting clause in and publication of each state law, 1 Stevens does not dispute that each of the statutes he was convicted under was published, with the enactment clause, in the Session Laws of Colorado. See Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24- 70-223(1) (providing for such publication). We thu s find Stevens’ application to be without merit. For substantially the reasons of the district court , the application for COA is DENIED , and the appeal is DISMISSED
. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED
. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court,-3- Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
§ 145.8 Terminology and classification; general. ( a ) The official classification terms defined in §§ 145.9 and 145.10 and the various designs illustrative of the official classifications reproduced in § 145.10 may be used only by participants and to describe products that have met all the specific requirements of such classifications.
( b ) Products produced under the Plan shall lose their identity under Plan terminology when they are purchased for resale by or consigned to nonparticipants.
( c ) Participating flocks, their eggs, and the baby and started poultry produced from them may be designated by their strain or trade name. When a breeder's trade name or strain designation is used, the participant shall be able by records to substantiate that the products so designated are from flocks that are composed of either birds hatched from eggs produced under the direct supervision of the breeder of such strain, or stock multiplied by persons designated and so reported by the breeder to each Official State Agency concerned.
#### § 46.119 Research undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects.

Except for research waived under § 46.101(i) or exempted under § 46.104, in the event research is undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects, but it is later proposed to involve human subjects in the research, the research shall first be reviewed and approved by an IRB, as provided in this policy, a certification submitted by the institution to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research, and final approval given to the proposed change by the Federal department or agency component.
#### § 332.1 Definitions.

*Cooperative interstate shipment program.* A cooperative meat inspection program described in § 321.3 of this subchapter.

*Cooperative State meat inspection program.* A cooperative State-Federal meat inspection program described in § 321.1 of this subchapter.

*Designated personnel.* State inspection personnel that have been trained in the enforcement of the Act and any additional State program requirements in order to provide inspection services to selected establishments.

*Interstate commerce.* “Interstate commerce” has the same meaning as “commerce” under § 301.2 of this subchapter.

*Selected establishment.* An establishment operating under a State cooperative meat inspection program that has been selected by the Administrator, in coordination with the State where the establishment is located, to participate in a cooperative interstate shipment program.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant to**
 **18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **As
        Adopted Pursuant To**
 **Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on
        Form
        10-K/A of Glimcher Realty Trust (the “Company”) for the period ended December
        31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
        hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. Glimcher, President, Chief Executive
        Officer and Trustee of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
  
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
        March 13, 2006
 
 /s/
        Michael P. Glimcher
 President,
        Chief Executive Officer
 and
        Trustee
 (Principal
        Executive Officer)
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Glimcher Realty Trust and will be retained
        by Glimcher Realty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or its staff upon request.
    5
#### Johannes E. Schroeder and Herman Brauss, as Ancillary Administrators, etc., of Johannes Schroeder, Deceased, Appellants, v. Albion L. Page, as Ancillary Executor, etc., of John M. Young, Deceased, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, *939with costs, on *Meyer*v. *Page*(112 App. Div. 625) and *Schroeder*v. *Page*(117 id. 107)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40039

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BENJAMIN PEREZ-CASTILLO, also known as Benjamin

Castillo-Perez 

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-1026-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Benjamin Perez-Castillo

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. UnitedStates, 523

U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision

and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant's motion for summary

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### §2160. Boards of review

(a) Boards of review shall be convened at such times as the Secretary may prescribe, to review the records of cases of officers recommended by boards of inquiry for removal.

(b) If, after reviewing the record of the case, a board of review determines that the officer has failed to establish that he should be retained, it shall send its recommendation to the Secretary for his action.

(c) If, after reviewing the record of the case, a board of review determines that the officer has established that he should be retained on active duty, his case is closed. However, at any time after one year from the date of the determination in a case arising under clause (1) of section 2158 of this title and at any time after the date of the determination in a case arising under clause (2) of that section, an officer may again be required to show cause for retention.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 188, §323; amended Pub. L. 97–295, §2(10), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1302; renumbered §2160 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 323 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2158" for "section 321".

1982—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–295 inserted "of this title" after "section 321".
#### § 202.1 Applicability of other rules.

The Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings Instituted by the Secretary Under Various Statutes, 7 CFR part 1, subpart H, are applicable to all rate proceedings under Sections 304, 305, 306, 307 and 310 of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 205, 206, 207, 208 and 211, except insofar as those Rules are in conflict with any provision herein.
### §2092. Board of directors

Each Federal land bank association shall elect from its voting shareholders a board of directors of such number, for such terms, in such manner, and with such qualifications as may be required by its bylaws except that, at least one member shall be elected by the other directors, which member shall not be a director, officer, employee, stockholder, or agent of a System institution.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title II, §2.11, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1635; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title V, §502(d), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1868.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2092, Pub. L. 92–181, title II, §2.11, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 598, related to board of directors, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 100–233, §401.

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–237 substituted "stockholder, or agent" for "or stockholder".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1622, provided that this section is effective 6 months after Jan. 6, 1988.