Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices 12711 

Interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration within 30 days 

of publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. See 19 CFR 

351.310(c). Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

briefs. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 

the Act, the Department will issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of our 

analysis of the issues raised by the 

parties in their comments, within 120 

days after issuance of these preliminary 

results. 

Deadline for Submission of Publicly 

Available Surrogate Value Information 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(3), the deadline for 

submission of publicly available 

information to value factors of 

production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) is 

20 days after the date of publication of 

the preliminary determination. In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(1), if 

an interested party submits factual 

information less than ten days before, 

on, or after (if the Department has 

extended the deadline), the applicable 

deadline for submission of such factual 

information, an interested party has ten 

days to submit factual information to 

rebut, clarify, or correct the factual 

information no later than ten days after 

such factual information is served on 

the interested party. However, the 

Department notes that 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(1), permits new information 

only insofar as it rebuts, clarifies, or 

corrects information recently placed on 

the record. See, e.g., Glycine from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Rescission, in Part, 72 FR 58809 

(October 17, 2007), and accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 2. Furthermore, the 

Department generally will not accept 

business proprietary information in 

either the surrogate value submissions 

or the rebuttals thereto, as the regulation 

regarding the submission of surrogate 

values allows only for the submission of 

publicly available information. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions directly to CBP 

15 days after the date of publication of 

the final results of this review. In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

we calculated exporter/importer (or 

customer)-specific assessment rates for 

the merchandise subject to this review. 

Where the respondent has reported 

reliable entered values, we calculated 

importer (or customer)-specific ad 

valorem rates by aggregating the 

dumping margins calculated for all U.S. 

sales to each importer (or customer), 

and dividing this amount by the total 

entered value of the sales to each 

importer (or customer). See 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). Where an importer (or 

customer)-specific ad valorem rate is 

greater than de minimis, we will apply 

the assessment rate to the entered value 

of the importers’/customers’ entries 

during the POR. See 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). 

Where we do not have entered values 

for all U.S. sales, we calculated a perunit assessment rate by aggregating the 

antidumping duties due for all U.S. 

sales to each importer (or customer) and 

dividing this amount by the total 

quantity sold to that importer (or 

customer). See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). To 

determine whether the duty assessment 

rates are de minimis, in accordance with 

the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer 

(or customer)-specific ad valorem ratios 

based on the estimated entered value. 

Where an importer (or customer)- 

specific ad valorem rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate appropriate entries without 

regard to antidumping duties. See 19 

CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual review, we 

calculated an assessment rate based on 

the weighted-average of the cash deposit 

rates calculated for companies selected 

for individual review, where those rates 

were not de minimis or based on 

adverse facts available, in accordance 

with Department practice. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, will be 

effective upon publication of the final 

results of this administrative review for 

all shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash-deposit 

rate will be that established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 

percent, no cash deposit will be 

required for that company); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the PRC-wide rate of 198.63 percent; 

and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

PRC exporters that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

This administrative review and notice 

are in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: February 28, 2011. 

Paul Piquado, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5262 Filed 3–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Smart Grid Advisory Committee 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of open meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Smart Grid Advisory 

Committee (SGAC or Committee), will 

hold a meeting on Thursday, March 24, 

2011 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. The 

primary purpose of this meeting is to 

review the early findings and 

observations of each Subcommittee, 

strategize the Table of Contents for the 

Committee report to NIST, agree on the 

page limit for each subcommittee, and 

look for any common overarching 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
12712 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices 

themes. There will also be breakouts for 

each subcommittee to meet 

individually. The agenda may change to 

accommodate Committee business. The 

final agenda will be posted on the Smart 

Grid Web site at http://www.nist.gov/ 

smartgrid. 

DATES: The SGAC will hold a meeting 

on Thursday, March 24, 2011, from 8:30 

a.m. until 5 p.m. The meeting will be 

open to the public. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in 

the Lecture Room C, in the 

Administration Building at NIST in 

Gaithersburg, Maryland. Please note 

admittance instructions under the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

George W. Arnold, National Coordinator 

for Smart Grid Interoperability, National 

Institute of Standards and Technology, 

100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8100, 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8100; 

telephone 301–975–2232, fax 301–975– 

4091; or via e-mail at nistsgfac@nist.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Committee was established in 

accordance with the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.). 

Background information on the 

Committee is available at http:// 

www.nist.gov/smartgrid/committee.cfm. 

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., notice is 

hereby given that the Smart Grid 

Advisory Committee (SGAC) will hold a 

meeting on Thursday, March 24, 2011, 

from 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. The meeting 

will be held in the Lecture Room C, in 

the Administration Building at NIST in 

Gaithersburg, Maryland. The primary 

purpose of this meeting is to review the 

early findings and observations of each 

Subcommittee, strategize the Table of 

Contents for the Committee report to 

NIST, agree on the page limit for each 

subcommittee, and look for any 

common overarching themes. There will 

also be breakouts for each subcommittee 

to meet individually. The agenda may 

change to accommodate Committee 

business. The final agenda will be 

posted on the Smart Grid Web site at 

http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid. 

Individuals and representatives of 

organizations who would like to offer 

comments and suggestions related to the 

Committee’s affairs are invited to 

request a place on the agenda by 

contacting Cuong Nguyen at 

cuong.nguyen@nist.gov or (301) 975– 

2254 no later than March 17, 2011. On 

March 24, 2011, approximately one-half 

hour will be reserved at the end of the 

meeting for public comments, and 

speaking times will be assigned on a 

first-come, first-serve basis. The amount 

of time per speaker will be determined 

by the number of requests received, but 

is likely to be about 3 minutes each. 

Questions from the public will not be 

considered during this period. Speakers 

who wish to expand upon their oral 

statements, those who had wished to 

speak but could not be accommodated 

on the agenda, and those who were 

unable to attend in person are invited to 

submit written statements to the Office 

of the National Coordinator for Smart 

Grid Interoperability, National Institute 

of Standards and Technology, 100 

Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8100, 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8100; fax 301– 

975–4091; or via e-mail at 

nistsgfac@nist.gov. 

All visitors to the NIST site are 

required to pre-register to be admitted. 

Anyone wishing to attend this meeting 

must register by close of business 

Thursday, March 17, 2011, in order to 

attend. Please submit your name, time 

of arrival, e-mail address, and phone 

number to Cuong Nguyen. Non-U.S. 

citizens must also submit their country 

of citizenship, title, employer/sponsor, 

and address. Mr. Nguyen’s e-mail 

address is cuong.nguyen@nist.gov and 

his phone number is (301) 975–2254. 

Dated: March 2, 2011. 

Charles H. Romine, 

Acting Associate Director for Laboratory 

Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5250 Filed 3–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

[Docket No. 110124059–1058–02] 

Announcing Draft Federal Information 

Processing Standard (FIPS) 201–2, 

Personal Identity Verification of 

Federal Employees and Contractors 

Standard, Request for Comments, and 

Public Workshop on Draft FIPS 201–2 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST), Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST) 

publishes this notice to request 

comments on Draft Federal Information 

Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 

201–2, ‘‘Personal Identity Verification of 

Federal Employees and Contractors 

Standard.’’ Draft FIPS 201–2 amends 

FIPS 201–1 and includes clarifications 

of existing text, removal of conflicting 

requirements, additional text to improve 

clarity, adaptation to changes in the 

environment since the publication of 

FIPS 201–1, and specific changes 

requested by Federal agencies and 

implementers. NIST has received 

numerous change requests, some of 

which, after analysis and coordination 

with the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) and United States 

Government (USG) stakeholders, are 

incorporated in the Draft FIPS 201–2. 

Before recommending FIPS 201–2 to the 

Secretary of Commerce for review and 

approval, NIST invites comments from 

the public concerning the proposed 

changes. NIST will hold a public 

workshop at NIST in Gaithersburg, MD 

to present the Draft FIPS 201–2. Please 

see admittance instructions in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

June 6, 2011. The public workshop will 

be held on April 18–19, 2011. Preregistration must be completed by close 

of business on April 11, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be 

sent to: Chief, Computer Security 

Division, Information Technology 

Laboratory, ATTN: Comments on 

Revision Draft FIPS 201–1, National 

Institute of Standards and Technology, 

100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8930, 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Electronic 

comments may be sent to: 

piv_comments@nist.gov. Anyone 

wishing to attend the workshop in 

person, must pre-register at http:// 

www.nist.gov/allevents.cfm. Additional 

workshop details and webcast will be 

available on the NIST Computer 

Security Resource Center Web site at 

http://csrc.nist.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William MacGregor, (301) 975–8721, 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail 

Stop 8930, Gaithersburg, MD 20899– 

8930, e-mail: 

william.macgregor@nist.gov, or 

Hildegard Ferraiolo, (301) 975–6972, email: hildegard.ferraiolo@nist.gov, or 

Ketan Mehta, (301) 975–8405, e-mail: 

ketan.mehta@nist.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FIPS 201 

was issued in February 2005, and in 

accordance with NIST policy was due 

for review in 2010. In consideration of 

changes in the environment over the last 

five years and specific requests for 

changes from USG stakeholders, NIST 

determined that a revision of FIPS 201– 

1 (version in effect) is warranted. NIST 

has received numerous change requests, 

some of which, after analysis and 

coordination with OMB and USG 

stakeholders, are incorporated in the 

Draft FIPS 201–2. Other change requests 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES