alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Montana Rural Development State Office**2229 Boot Hill CourtBozeman, MT 59715(406) 585-2580

**Business Programs:** (406) 309-3350

**Community Facilities Programs:**(406) 585-2520

**Housing Programs:** (406) 371-2553

**Water and Environmental Programs:** (406) 585-2520

**Questions about Multifamily Housing Programs?** Call 1-800-292-8293

                          -    - State DirectorKathleen Williams (View Bio)
 
                          -                      View All State Contacts                   
                          -                        Follow the RD Montana Office on X                     
                          -                        Receive Emails Through GovDelivery                     

## Highlights and Announcements

                                -    Montana Rural Explorer - March 2024 
                                -    Montana Success Stories 
                                -    USDA Rural Development Summary of Programs 

### Featured Programs

                          -  Rural Energy for America Program Renewable Energy Systems & Energy Efficiency Improvement Guaranteed Loans & Grants 
                          -  Water & Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Community Facilities Direct Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Single Family Housing Repair Loans & Grants 
                          -  Business & Industry Loan Guarantees 
                          -  Distance Learning & Telemedicine Grants 
View All State Programs

### Resources

**Check Eligibility**Check a home, town or service location to verify eligibility for Rural Programs

**Manage your USDA Loan**You can create an account and manage your current loan through the Customer Service Center (CSC) portal. You can also contact the CSC at 800-414-1226
View All Resources

## Rural Development News

                                -  USDA Invests in 26 Clean Energy Projects to Strengthen Montana Farms and BusinessesMar 28, 2024 
                                -  Grants Available to Organizations that Assist Montana Ag Producers in Applying for Renewable Energy FundingFeb 20, 2024 
                                -  USDA Invests Nearly $3.2 Million to Boost Fertilizer Production and Generate Energy Efficiencies in Montana’s Rural AreasJan 22, 2024 
                                -  USDA Awards More than $2.2 Million in Grants to Support Montana Agricultural ProducersJan 17, 2024 
                                -  USDA Expands Eligibility for Tribes Under the Rural Business Development Grants ProgramDec 14, 2023 
                                -  USDA Invests $8.2 Million to Create Economic and Educational Opportunities in Underserved Rural and Tribal Montana CommunitiesDec 12, 2023 

View All State News
Exhibit 99.1

Great
Lakes REIT
823 Commerce Drive, Suite 300
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523

November 13,
2002

Securities
and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:    Certification
Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q of
Great Lakes REIT (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officer's knowledge:



| | /s/RICHARD A. MAYName: Richard A. May
Title:Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                    
| | /s/JAMES HICKSName: James Hicks
Title:Chief Financial Officer      

---

QuickLinks
攜手共進,美國繁榮昌盛

OneRD擔保貸款計畫:

商業和工業貸款擔保

該計畫是做什

麼的?

該計畫為貸款人向農村企業提供

貸款擔保。

哪些貸方可以

申請此計畫?

貸款人需要法律權威、財務實力和

豐富經驗來運營成功的貸款計畫。

這包括受美國或州適用機構的監督

和信用檢查的貸款人,包括:

• 聯邦和國有特許銀行。

• 儲蓄和貸款。

• 擁有直接貸款全的農業信

貸銀行。

• 信用社。

其他不受監管的貸款機構也可以根據

OneRD法規的標準由該機構批准。

誰有資格獲得這些擔保貸

款?

• 盈利或非盈利企業。

• 合作社。

• 聯邦承認的部落。

• 公共機構

• 從事或提議從事業務的個人。

借貸限制是什麼?

• 個人借款人必須是美國公民或在合法

獲得永久居留權後居住在美國。

私人實體借款人必須證明貸款資金將

留在美國,並且被抵押的設施將主要

為美國農村居民創造新的或節省現有

的就業機會。

什麼區域被視為符合條件的區域?

• 人口超過50,000的城市或城鎮以

外的農村地區。

• 借款人的總部可以設在大城市內,

只要專案位於符合條件的農村地

區。

• 貸款人可能位於美國的任何地

方。

• 根據地方和區域食品系統倡議,可以

在農村或城市地區資助專案。

• 檢查符合條件的商業機會地

址。

如何使用擔保貸款資金?

符合條件的用途包括(但不限

於):

• 業務轉換、擴大、維修、現代化或發

展。

• 為商業或工業物業購買和開發土

地、建築物和相關基礎設施。

• 購買和安裝機械和設備、用品或庫

存。

• 債務再融資,當這種再融資改善現

金流並創造就業機會時。

• 商業和工業收購時,貸款將維持業務運

營並創造或節省就業機會。

擔保貸款資金不能用於哪些用途?

• 信用額度。

• 自有住房和出租住房。

• 高爾夫球場或高爾夫球場基

礎設施。

• 賽馬場或賭博設施。

• 教會或教會控制的組織。

• 兄弟組織。

• 貸款、投資和保險公司。

• 農業生產,但有一些例外。

• 向借款人的受益人或將保留借款人所有

權權益的個人或實體分配或付款。
 OneRD擔保貸款計畫:

商業和工業貸款擔保

需要什麼抵押品?

抵押品必須具有足以保護貸方和代理機

構利益的成文價值。貸款人將貼現符合

健全的貸款價值對政策,貼現抵押品價

值至少等於貸款金額。貸款人必須對正

在使用的折扣提供令人滿意的證明。抵

押品需要災害險(等於貸款金額或折舊

重置價值,以較低者為准)。

貸款擔保的最高金額是多少?

貸款擔保百分比每年在《聯邦公報》

的公告中公佈。2021財年批准的B&I

貸款將獲得80%的擔保。

貸款期限是什麼?

經機構同意,貸款人將根據擔保貸款資金

的使用,被抵押資產和用作抵押品的資產

的有用經濟壽命以及借款人的還款能力,

確定並證明擔保貸款期限的合理性。貸款

期限不超過40年。

利率是多少?

• 利率由貸款人和借款人協商。

• 匯率可能是固定的或可變的。

• 浮動利率的調整頻率可能不會超過

每季度。

適用的費用是多少?

• 有初始擔保費,目前為保證金

額的3%。

• 有一筆擔保保留費,目前為未償

還本金餘額的0.5%,每年支付

(2)。

• 貸款發放的合理和慣常費用由借款人

和貸款人協商。

承保要求是什麼?

• 貸款人將使用信用檔程式和承銷

流程進行信用評估,這些程式和

流程應符合普遍接受的審慎貸款

做法,也符合貸款人自己的政

策、程式和貸款做法。

• 貸款人的評估必須解決借款人和項

目的任何財務或其他信用弱點,並

討論風險緩解要求。

• 貸款人必須分析所有信貸因素,以

確定信貸因素和擔保貸款條款和條

件確保有擔保的貸款償還。

• 要分析的信貸因素包括但不限於性

格、能力、資本、抵押品和條件。

我們如何開始?

• 貸款人全年通過美國農業部當地政

府接受申請。

• 有興趣的借款人應向貸方詢問該計畫。

• 有興趣參與該計畫的貸款人應聯繫專

案所在州的美國農業部農村發展業務

計畫主任。

誰可以回答問題?

聯繫為您所在地區服務的當地農村發展

部。

什麼法律管轄該計畫?

• 聯邦法規,

7 CFR 5001.

• 該計畫由《綜合農場和農村發

展法》授權。

為什麼美國農業部農村發展部要這樣

做?

該計畫通過貸款擔保增加獲得商業資本的機

會,從而改善了農村社區的經濟健康狀況。

這使商業貸款人能夠為農村企業提供負擔得

起的融資。

注:由於此頁面上的資訊可能會更改,因此請始終查閱上面標題為“什麼法律管轄此計畫”的部

分中列出的計畫說明。您也可以聯繫您當地的辦公室尋求幫助。美國農業部是提供機會均等的

雇主和貸方。

2020年9月
# C_2012194EN.01001901.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission

(Case T-300/10) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to contract LIEN 97 2011 - Partial refusal of access - Determination of the subject-matter of the initial application - Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual - Exception relating to protection of the decision-making process - Principle of sound administration - Concrete and individual examination - Duty to state reasons)

2012/C 194/29

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV (Rosbach, Germany) (represented by: H. Kaltenecker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and T. Scharf, Agents, assisted by R. van der Hout, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 29 April 2010 refusing the applicant full access to the file relating to contract LIEN 97 2011

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 29 April 2010 in so far as it impliedly refuses access to the documents which it sent to the colleague of the European Ombudsman, other than those identified by the latter in files 1 to 4 of the file relating to contract LIEN 97 2011; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 29 April 2010 in so far as it impliedly refuses access to the documents which it sent to the colleague of the European Ombudsman, other than those identified by the latter in files 1 to 4 of the file relating to contract LIEN 97 2011;

| 2. | Also annuls the Commission’s decision of 29 April 2010 in so far as it expressly or impliedly refuses access to the documents of the file relating to contract LIEN 97 2011 referred to in paragraphs 106, 134, 194 and 196 of this judgment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Also annuls the Commission’s decision of 29 April 2010 in so far as it expressly or impliedly refuses access to the documents of the file relating to contract LIEN 97 2011 referred to in paragraphs 106, 134, 194 and 196 of this judgment;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and four fifths of the costs incurred by Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and four fifths of the costs incurred by Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.01 ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Semiconductor Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 26, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, N. Damodar Reddy, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ N. Damodar Reddy
N. Damodar Reddy
Chief Executive Officer June 23, 2005
# C_2011370EN.01002401.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2011 — Ben Ri Electrónica v OHMI — Sacopa (LT LIGHT-THECNO)

(Case T-143/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark LT LIGHT-THECNO - Earlier Community figurative mark LT - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 370/39

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ben Ri Electrónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A.I. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sacopa, SAU (Sant Jaume de Llierca, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2010 (Case R 1625/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ben Ri Electrónica, SA and Sacopa, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 February 2010 (Case R 1625/2008-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 February 2010 (Case R 1625/2008-4);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ben-Ri Electrónica, SA. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ben-Ri Electrónica, SA.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.

1

---
### §1355. Conditions precedent to acceptance of plans and programs for review and approval by Secretary

The Secretary shall not accept the five-year plan of a State for review and approval under this chapter unless the Governor of the State or his designee determines and certifies that the plan is consistent with State policies and objectives; and the Secretary shall not accept an annual technical services program for review and approval under this chapter unless the designated agency has, as certified thereto by the Governor or his designee—

(a) invited all qualified institutions in the State to submit proposals for providing technical services under the chapter;

(b) coordinated its programs with other States and with other publicly supported activities within the State, as appropriate;

(c) established adequate rules to insure that no officer or employee of the State, the designated agency, or any participating institution, shall receive compensation for technical services he performs, for which funds are provided under this chapter, from sources other than his employer, and shall not otherwise maintain any private interest in conflict with his public responsibility;

(d) determined that matching funds will be available from State or other non-Federal sources;

(e) determined that such technical services program does not provide a service which on the date of such certification is economically and readily available in such State from private technical services, professional consultants, or private institutions;

(f) planned no services specially related to a particular firm or company, public work, or other capital project except insofar as the services are of general concern to the industry and commerce of the community, State, or region;

(g) provided for making public all reports prepared in the course of furnishing technical services supported under this chapter or for making them available at cost to any person on request.

(Pub. L. 89–182, §5, Sept. 14, 1965, 79 Stat. 681.)
#### John W. Scott *v.*James Hamilton.

1. Measure op *damages—assault and battery.*In cases of assault and battery it is impossible to estimate precisely the measure of damages which will repair the injury. To a great extent it is a matter of sentiment and feeling, under the guidance of sound judgment, duly weighing all the circumstances of the case.

2. Excessive *damages—assault and battery.*A verdict for §1250 was not regarded as exceeding rational bounds in an action of trespass to the person, where there was no justification for the beating inflicted by two persons upon the plaintiff, and it appeared to have been severe. As mere compensation for the physical injury, the damages may be large, but when it is considered that the jury had a right to award punitive damages, the court was not prepared to say the damages were excessive.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John G. Rogers, Judge, presiding.

This was an action of trespass, by James Hamilton against John W. Scott and Daniel Leonard, for an assault and battery alleged to have been committed by the defendants upon the person of the plaintiff. Scott, alone, appealed from the judgment.

Messrs. Barker & Waite, and Mr. Wm. Hopkins, for the appellant.

Messrs. Forrester & Beem, for the appellee.

Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Cook county, in an action of trespass assault and battery.

Ho question of law is raised upon this record. The parties were sworn, and were the only witnesses to establish the trespass. It is not unusual, in such cases, there should be con*86flict in the testimony, which the jury reconciled the best way they could, in favor of the plaintiff, and we can not say they erred in so doing.

The court overruled a motion for a new trial, after requiring the plaintiff to enter a *remittitur*of one thousand dollars. That court had the witnesses in their presence, and observed their manner of testifying, and took note of all the circumstances, and was satisfied the plaintiff was entitled to the verdict.

It is complained the damages are excessive. We do not think so. They are large, so far as real physical injury was done, but that is not the only consideration in cases of this nature, as was said in *Walker et al.*v. *Martin,*43 Ill. 508. In this kind of torts it is impossible to estimate precisely the measure of damages which would repair the injury. To a great extent it is a matter of sentiment and feeling, under the guidance of sound judgment, duly weighing all the circumstances of the case.

. The jury had a right to award punitive damages in addition to such as may be considered cornpensatory merely. There was no justification for the beating, and it seems to have been quite a severe one. We can not say twelve hundred and fifty dollars exceeds rational bounds, and must affirm the judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  January 23, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning        
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|                        |                            
|                        | John P. Manning            
|                        | Principal Executive Officer
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Grants to Help Agricultural Producers and Small Rural 

Businesses Develop and Market New Products

 WASHINGTON, Dec. 11, 2019 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for 

Rural Development Donald “DJ” LaVoy today announced that USDA is accepting applications for grants to 

help farmers, ranchers and producer-based businesses nationwide develop new products and expand marketing 

opportunities.

 USDA is making $37 million in grants available under the Value-Added Producer Grant (VAPG) program to 

develop new products from raw agricultural products or promote new markets for established products. 

Veterans, socially-disadvantaged groups, beginning farmers and ranchers, operators of small- and medium-sized 

family farms and ranches, and farmer and rancher cooperatives are given special priority.

 Electronic applications must be submitted to grants.gov by March 5, 2020, at midnight eastern time. Paper 

applications must be submitted to the applicant’s nearest USDA office by March 10, 2020. Additional 

information is available on page 67703 of the Dec. 11, 2019, Federal Register.

 USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve the 

quality of life in rural America. Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results 

in helping rural communities build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in 

infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Key strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life 

 USDA invites non-federal independent grant reviewers to evaluate and score applications submitted under this 

notice.

#
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, New Strategies 
for Growing 3D Tissues, which was published in the Federal Register on 
February 15, 2011, FR 2011-3373.
    The meeting was originally advertised for March 9-10, 2011. The 
meeting will take place on March 9, 2011 only. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: February 23, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4547 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### **CHAPTER 70—COMPREHENSIVE SMOKELESS TOBACCO HEALTH EDUCATION**

Sec.
4401.
Public education.
4402.
Smokeless tobacco warning.
4403.
Ingredient reporting.
4404.
Enforcement, regulations, and construction.
4405.
Injunctions.
4406.
Preemption.
4407.
Omitted.
4408.
Definitions.