alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006237EN.01002301.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/23

---

Action brought on 11 August 2006 — Taruffi v Commission

(Case F-95/06)

(2006/C 237/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Adrien Taruffi (Schouweiler, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Declare illegal Article 4(1) of the General Implementing Provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, adopted by the Commission decision of 23 December 2004 (GIP); |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare illegal Article 4(1) of the General Implementing Provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, adopted by the Commission decision of 23 December 2004 (GIP);

| — | Annul the Commission decisions fixing the applicant's merit and priority points in respect of the 2004 and 2005 promotion exercises and the decisions not to include his name on the merit list after Promotion Committees and on the list of officials promoted to Grade B*10 in the 2004 promotion exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission decisions fixing the applicant's merit and priority points in respect of the 2004 and 2005 promotion exercises and the decisions not to include his name on the merit list after Promotion Committees and on the list of officials promoted to Grade B*10 in the 2004 promotion exercise;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his application, the applicant argues that there was no genuine examination of his merits in the appraisal carried out by the Promotion Committee, following the administration's positive response to his first complaint.

As regards the 2004 exercise, the applicant pleads, inter alia, that there was a manifest error of assessment in that his merits in the 2004 exercise were compared to those of the officials covered by the ‘research’ budget whereas, for that exercise, he was covered by the ‘operations’ budget.

As regards the 2005 exercise, the applicant regards as illegal the Commission's interpretation of Article 4(1) of the GIP, under which, even though the applicant had been assigned to two separate Directorates-General and an interim report had been drawn up for the first part of 2004 including the award of merit points, only the Directorate-General responsible for establishing his final report would have the power to award priority points.

In general, the applicant submits that the contested decisions were adopted in breach of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and that length of service, rather than merit, was taken into account as the decisive criterion.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,442,601
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,686,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (30,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    443,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,974,356
<PP&E>                                         863,285
<DEPRECIATION>                               (165,496)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,351,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          330,432
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       248,126
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,530,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,351,202
<SALES>                                      8,938,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,938,282
<CGS>                                        3,241,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,241,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,157,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,539,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                   644,182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,895,540
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,895,540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT  32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63  of  title  18,  United  States  Code), the
undersigned  officer  of  FTS Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2006 (the "Form
10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

/s/  Scott  Gallagher
-------------------
Scott  Gallagher
Chief  Executive  Officer  and
Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer
November  20,  2006
# RD, RPG and Delta DB: a Great Team!

Copied to clipboard

09.26.2022

Retired schoolteacher and great-grandmother Rutha was due to turn 80 years old the day after she welcomed USDA Rural Development (RD) and the Delta Design Build (Delta DB) Workshop to her recently repaired home in Greenwood, Mississippi in late August 2022. 

Last year, Rutha’s daughter Helen helped her mother apply for help from Delta DB, a social impact design-build firm based in Greenwood that specializes in affordable housing construction and rehabilitation in the economically depressed Mississippi Delta. At Rutha’s home, Delta DB identified issues that made parts of the house unsafe, such as a crumbling section of foundation and a nest of wires hanging out of a coverless electrical box directly above the washing machine.  

Earlier this year, Delta DB received an RD Housing Preservation Grant (HPG) and directed some of the funds to Rutha’s house, as well as 15 other homes in the area. The HPG program provides grants to sponsoring organizations like Delta DB for the repair or rehabilitation of housing owned or occupied by low- and very-low-income rural citizens like Rutha. 

Delta DB social impact architect Emily Roush-Elliot said, “We were able to use the funding to work on life and safety issues. We did a bunch of electrical work, and the top safety issues, places where the foundation was really sagging and failing.”  

Over the years, Rutha and her family had been fixing things in the matriarch’s home but eventually could not afford to keep up with costly repairs. 

“They fixed some of the things that we were trying to get done and were not able to,” Helen said. “Momma’s health started to decline, so that was our focus.” 

Because her immediate family lives locally, her children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren take turns staying with Rutha to help around the house. This rotation means that at any given time, up to four generations of Rutha’s family live under the same roof. With such precious cargo inside, the house needed to be safe. RD and Delta DB were able to help with that need. 

Rutha was delighted to talk about her favorite part of the improvements: the repaired shower leaks and enclosing of exposed plumbing in the home’s only bathroom. 

“I just love the bathroom,” Rutha said. 

In response, Helen said, “I’m just happy and thankful they were able to get it done.”

Obligation Amount: 

Year(s) of Obligation: 
2021

Congressional District: 

## Related Story

Browse All Stories →

### Preserving History in the Delta 

[Read More]

09.26.2022

African AmericanHome RepairHousingRural DevelopmentUnderserved
##### 



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REGARDING FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDING

SEPTEMBER 30, 2003, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


EXHIBIT 32.1

I, Nello Gonfiantini III, Chairman of the Board, President and Secretary
of Specialty Trust, Inc. (Company), hereby state and certify in this written
statement that:

(a)  The quarterly report of the Company filed on form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                          |  |                                  |  | 
|------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Nello Gonfiantini III |  | Dated November 12, 2003         
|                          |  |                                 
|Name:                     |  | Nello Gonfiantini III            |  | 
|Title :                   |  | Chairman of the Board, President |  | 
|                          |  | and Secretary                    |  | 
|                          |  | (Chief Executive Officer)        |  | 

This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

38
| Date:   June 14, 2013 | By     /S/ GEORGE E. BORST |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |    George E. Borst                   |
|                                 |     President and               |
|                                 | Chief Executive Officer                             |

| 154  |
|-----------|
**Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2011 – Dai Cugini v Rijksdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid**

**(Case C-151/10)**

First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure – Directive 97/81/EC – Equal treatment of part-time and full-time workers – Discrimination – Administrative obstacle likely to limit the opportunities for part-time work – Mandatory publication and retention of contracts and work-schedules

Social policy – Framework agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC – Directive 97/81 – National legislation requiring part-time workers’ contracts and work schedules to be kept and published (Council Directive
97/81, Annex, Clauses 4 and 5(1)) (see paras 45-46, 49-50, 55-56, operative part)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Afdeling Hasselt) – Interpretation of Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC (OJ 1998 L 14, p. 9) – National legislation providing for a system for the publication and monitoring of work schedules of part-time workers, consisting of the mandatory compilation and retention, subject to criminal or administrative penalties, of documents recording the exact duration of work performed by each worker. |

**Operative part**

Clause 4 of the Framework agreement annexed to Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework agreement
on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which makes
employers responsible for the obligations of retention and publication of the contracts and work-schedules of part-time workers,
if it is established that such legislation does not lead to their being treated less favourably than full-time workers in
a similar situation or, if there is such a difference in treatment, it is established that it is justified on objective grounds
and does not go beyond what is necessary to attain the objectives thus pursued.

It is for the referring court to perform the necessary factual and legal investigation, particularly with regard to the applicable
national law, in order to determine whether that is so in the case before it.

If the referring court were to conclude that the national legislation at issue is incompatible with Clause 4 of the Framework
Agreement on part-time work annexed to Directive 97/81, Clause 5(1) thereof would have to be interpreted as precluding such
legislation.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                  WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
           OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
           AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

In connection with the Annual Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund I (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company respectively, each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such
officer's knowledge, that: (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             -----------------------------------
                                             George S. Springsteen
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             March 30, 2006


                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Kimberly A. Springsteen
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             March 30, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# C_2012073EN.01002703.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2012 — Cervecería Modelo v OHIM — Plataforma Continental (LA VICTORIA DE MEXICO)

(Case T-205/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark LA VICTORIA DE MEXICO - Earlier Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘victoria’ and earlier national word mark VICTORIA - Registration refused in part - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 73/54

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cervecería Modelo, SA de CV (Mexico, Mexico) (represented by: C. Lema Devesa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Plataforma Continental, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2010 (Case R 322/2009-2) in relation to opposition proceedings between Plataforma Continental, SL and Cervecería Modelo, SA de CV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cervecería Modelo, SA de CV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cervecería Modelo, SA de CV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Recognizes Top National Lending Partners to Support 

Rural Homeownership

WASHINGTON, June 6, 2023 – The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) today hosted the 2023

National Lender of the Year Awards Ceremony to recognize the work of its top national lending partners to

support rural homeownership in 2022. These lenders helped rural families and individuals buy homes

nationwide last year through USDA Rural Development’s Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program. 

The agency presented the awards to:

• USDA Top Originating Lender Champion Award 2023

o 1st – Movement Mortgage, based in South Carolina

o 2nd – Guild Mortgage Company, based in California

o 3rd – Cross Country Mortgage, based in Ohio

o 4th – Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation, based in Wisconsin

o 5th – Flat Branch Mortgage, based in Missouri

• USDA 2023 Top Wholesale Lender Champion Award 

o 1st – United Wholesale Mortgage LLC, based in Michigan

o 2nd – Flagstar Bank, based in Michigan

o 3rd – Click N Close, based in Texas

o 4th – Caliber Home Loans, based in Texas

o 5th – Plaza Home Mortgage, based in California

• USDA 2023 Underwriting Quality Champion Award

o 1st – Plains Commerce Bank, based in South Dakota

o 2nd – Iowa Bankers Mortgage Corp, based in Iowa

o 3rd – Benchmark Mortgage, based in Texas

• USDA 2023 Single Close Construction Champion

o 1st Signature Lending, based in Indiana

• USDA 2023 Rehab and Repair Champion

o Union Home Mortgage, based in Ohio

• USDA 2023 Manufactured Housing Origination Champion

o 1st Signature Lending, based in Indiana
• USDA 2023 Manufactured Housing Wholesaler Champion

o American Financial Resources, based in New Jersey

• USDA 2023 Top Local Lending Partner Champion

o 1st – HR Mortgage Corp, based in Puerto Rico

o 2nd – First Home Mortgage Corp, based in Maryland

o 3rd – Jersey Shore State Bank, based in Pennsylvania

• USDA First Native CDFI to Gain Lending Approval

o Lakota Federal Credit Union, based in South Dakota

USDA is a proud partner to all lenders who work with the agency to support rural homeownership. Since 

January 2021, the Biden Harris Administration has invested almost $34 billion to help more than 188,275 

people in rural and tribal communities buy and build homes through the Single Family Housing Guaranteed 

Loan Program. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
# C_2011252EN.01005502.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/55

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2011 — Ashbrook and Others v Commission

(Case F-99/10) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 252/121

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Michael Ashbrook (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and Others (represented by: B. Cortese, C. Cortese and F. Spitaleri)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the defendant’s decisions, reproduced in the applicants’ pay slips, to limit the adjustment of their salaries, with effect from July 2009, to an increase of 1,85 % in the context of the annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants on the basis of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009, and claim for compensation.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-99/10 Ashbrook and Others v Commission. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-99/10 Ashbrook and Others v Commission.

| 2. | Each party is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.01.2011, p. 42.

1

---
# C_2007006EN.01000102.xml

| 11.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4473 — MLCP/CIR/Oakwood)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/02)

On 18 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4473. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4473. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---