alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2.6 Transcripts and recordings. ( a ) The Commission Secretary shall maintain a complete transcript or electronic recording adequate to record fully the proceedings of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to public observation. An electronic recording of a meeting shall be coded, or other records shall be kept in a manner adequate to identify each speaker.
( b ) ( 1 ) In the case of any meeting closed pursuant to 11 CFR 2.4(b), as the last item of business, the Commission will determine which, if any, portions of the electronic recording or transcript and which if any, items of information withheld under 11 CFR 2.5 contain information which should be withheld pursuant to 11 CFR 2.4.
( 2 ) Portions of transcripts or recordings determined to be outside the scope of any exemptions under 11 CFR 2.6(b)(1) shall be promptly made available to the public through the Commission's Public Records Office at a cost sufficient to cover the Commission's actual cost of duplication or transcription. Requests for such copies shall be made and processed in accordance with the provisions of 11 CFR part 5.
( 3 ) Portions of transcripts or electronic recordings not made available immediately pursuant to 11 CFR 2.6(b)(1), and portions of transcripts or recordings withheld pursuant to 11 CFR 2.4(a), will be made available on request when the relevant exemptions no longer apply. Such materials shall be requested and processed under the provisions of 11 CFR 2.6(b)(2).
( c ) A complete verbatim copy of the transcript or a complete electronic recording of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public, shall be maintained by the Commission Secretary in confidential files of the Commission, for a minimum of two years subsequent to such meeting, or a minimum of one year after the conclusion of any agency proceeding with respect to which the meeting, or portion of the meeting, was held, whichever occurs later.
[50 FR 39972, Oct. 1, 1985, as amended at 75 FR 31, Jan. 4, 2010]
# DistressedCommunityIndex

# source

Data Source Data Set Focus: FY24 Distressed Zipcodes Source: Distressed Community Index data.Data Compiled By: IC Data Analytics Division, USDA.RD.DATA@usda.gov
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 20, 2010 

s1213 

Order 

 

December 20, 2010 

141687 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141687 

 COA: 291576 

Wayne CC: 08-008833-FC 

DERRIUS ALPHONZO HAYNES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 15, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ENHANCED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
### §22. Qualifications of permanent personnel

All permanent officers and employees of the Bureau shall be citizens of the United States.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1014; Pub. L. 86–769, §1, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 911.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., §§5, 6 (Mar. 6, 1902, ch. 139, §§5, 10, 32 Stat. 51, 53; June 18, 1929, ch. 28, §21, 46 Stat. 26).

Section consolidates section 5 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., with section 6 of such title.

A reference to "officers" was inserted for completeness, and the word "permanent" was inserted before "officers and employees" for the purpose of clarity.

The provision in section 5 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., excepting unskilled laborers from the requirements for citizenship, was omitted as superseded and covered by the Classification Act of 1949 (5 U.S.C., 1952 ed., ch. 21).

The provision that appointments and compensation shall be subject to the Classification Act of 1949 is new but is in accordance with existing law. See chapter 21 of title 5, U.S.C., 1952 ed., Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees.

The provision in section 5 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., giving preference in appointments to war veterans and their widows, was omitted as superseded and covered by the Veterans' Preference Act of 1944 (chapter 17 of Title 5, U.S.C., 1952 ed., Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees).

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1960—Pub. L. 86–769 struck out references to appointment and compensation under the Civil Service laws and the Classification Act of 1949.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Program for Employment of Spanish-Origin Personnel in Bureau; Report to Congress

Pub. L. 94–311, §6, June 16, 1976, 90 Stat. 689, required Department of Commerce to implement an affirmative action program within Bureau of the Census for employment of personnel of Spanish origin or descent and to submit a report to Congress within one year of June 16, 1976, on progress of such program.
### §310. Chief of Staff to President: appointment

The President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, may appoint a flag officer of the Coast Guard as the Chief of Staff to the President.

(Added Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §597(a), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3283, §54; renumbered §310, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §104(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4196.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 310, acts Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 519; Aug. 3, 1950, ch. 536, §12, 64 Stat. 407, related to recall to active duty during war or national emergency of warrant officers, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(A), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 177.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 54 of this title as this section.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**KEVIN A. BUNDY,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**CLEARFIELD COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 29 WM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 20th day of April, 2016, the Application for L eave to File Original** 

**Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is** DENIED

**.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,835
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,525
<PP&E>                                         452,754
<DEPRECIATION>                                 439,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          957,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,487,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,098,588
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,361,174)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,653
<SALES>                                         98,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,999
<CGS>                                              444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (10,587)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (66,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (66,133)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
----

|  | (1) | Based on my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | April 25. 2014 | /s/ MIGUEL PENELLA      |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|
|   |           | Miguel Penella          |
|   |           | Chief Executive Officer |

| Date:  | April 25, 2014 | /s/ ANDREW S. WILSON    |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|
|   |           | Andrew S. Wilson        |
|   |           | Chief Financial Officer |

----
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 24

- 10315

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus RODNEY TERRELL JACKSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:10

- cr

- 00020

- AW

- GRJ

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-10315 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 07/10/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 24

- 10315

Before J ILL P RYOR , B RANCH , and G RANT , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Megan Sail l ant , appointed counsel for Rodney Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Califo rnia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withd raw is GRANTED , and Jackson’s revocation of supervised release and

sentence are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 24-10315 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 07/10/2024 Page: 2 of 2
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL POWERS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §105(c)(1), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4202, inserted subchapter I designation and heading.
**

                    - Solo
                    - Enterprise
                    - Support
                    - News
                    - EDU
                    - Store
                    - ** **

**

                - Solo
                - Enterprise
                - Support
                - News
                - EDU
                - Store
                - **

# Solo Calibrations

# Solo

## Calibrations

Use the Solo app to perform compass and level calibrations when prompted by the controller. There’s no need to perform calibrations before each flight unless instructed to by the controller. Connect the app to Solo Wi-Fi and select a calibration from the Solo menu. Ensure that Solo and the controller are powered on with the propellers removed.

### Compass Calibration

Solo requires an interference-free environment for compass calibration, so ensure that you are away from metal buildings, reinforced concrete, or other metal structures before starting calibration. The app will prompt you to rotate Solo end-over-end multiple times until the bar at the top of the screen is completely green. If the calibration fails, move to a different location and try again.

### Level Calibration

A level calibration zeroes Solo’s accelerometers to recognize static states. To perform a level calibration, follow the prompts to place Solo perfectly still on each side in turn. In each step, wait a few seconds after moving Solo to press Next.

Are you still having issues calibrating Solo? Use the guided troubleshooting below for further assistance:

        - 
        - Was this helpful?
        - Yes     No

### 3D ROBOTICS – LIFE AFTER GRAVITY

                  - Drone
                  - Education
                  - News
                  - Software
                  - Store

**********

### General

                  - About
                  - Careers
                  - Community
                  - Terms
                  - Open Source

### Contact Us

                  - Press Center
                  - Enterprise
                  - Made For Solo
                  - Resellers
                  - Contact Us

### SUPPORT

                  - Register
                  - Support Home
                  - Account
                  - Helpful Links
                  - FAA Rules

### FIND A RESELLER

© 2016 3DR

CLOSE

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Subject (required)

Your Message (required)

CLOSE
#### § 319.311 Chow mein vegetables with meat, and chop suey vegetables with meat.

“Chow Mein Vegetables with Meat” and “Chop Suey Vegetables with Meat” shall contain not less than 12 percent meat computed on the weight of the uncooked fresh meat prior to its inclusion with the other ingredients. Mechanically Separated (Species) may be used in accordance with § 319.6.

[35 FR 15597, Oct. 3, 1970; 36 FR 11903, June 23, 1971, as amended at 43 FR 26425, June 20, 1978; 47 FR 28257, June 29, 1982]
### [§336. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(11)(B), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2921]

Section, added Pub. L. 90–496, §12, Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 841, included Virgin Islands within "State". See section 255 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
### §3302. Sealed bids

(a) Opening of Bids.—Sealed bids shall be opened publicly at the time and place stated in the solicitation.

(b) Criteria for Awarding Contract.—The head of the agency shall evaluate the bids in accordance with section 3301(a) of this title without discussions with the bidders and, except as provided in section 3301(b) of this title, shall award a contract with reasonable promptness to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the United States, considering only price and the other price-related factors included in the solicitation.

(c) Notice of Award.—The award of a contract shall be made by transmitting, in writing or by electronic means, notice of the award to the successful bidder. Within three days after the date of contract award, the head of the agency shall notify, in writing or by electronic means, each bidder not awarded the contract that the contract has been awarded.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1816(c)(2)(B), (4), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4182.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (b)(3) of section 2305 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1816(c)(1), (2)(B), (4) was based on Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, §2723(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1192; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §802(d)(2), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1589; Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1013(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3255.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3302, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 187, related to promotion to captain, major, or lieutenant colonel of commissioned officers of Medical Corps, Dental Corps, and Veterinary Corps upon examination of professional fitness and effect upon failure of promotion, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §204, title VII, §701, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2880, 2955, effective Sept. 15, 1981. See sections 631 and 632 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, §1816(c)(4)(A), (C), redesignated subsec. (b)(3) of section 2305 of this title as subsec. (a) of this section and inserted heading. Former second and third sentences of subsec. (a) designated subsecs. (b) and (c), respectively.

Subsec (b). Pub. L. 116–283, §1816(c)(4)(B), (D), designated second sentence of subsec. (a) as subsec. (b) of this section, inserted heading, and substituted "section 3301(a) of this title" for "paragraph (1)" and "section 3301(b) of this title" for "paragraph (2)".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–283, §1816(c)(4)(B), (E), designated third sentence of subsec. (a) as subsec. (c) of this section and inserted heading.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600344

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

BRANDON D. WARNER

Private First Class (E-2),

U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major F.W. Hoover, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 2d Radio Battalion, II 

Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp Lejeune, NC.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Colonel K.S. Woodard, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Major Lee C. Kindlon, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 31 January 2017

_________________________

Before MARKS, JONES, and BELSKY, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
**Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2011 – Chihabi and Others v Geert Vandendriessche, acting in his capacity
as receiver of Anneessen BVBA**

**(Case C-432/10)**

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility

Preliminary rulings – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context (Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court
of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 92(1) and 103(1)) (see paras 18-23)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen – Interpretation of Articles 5, 38 to 41 and 43, second indent of Article 177 and Articles 202(1) and (3) and 221(1) and (3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) and of Article 199(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1) – Post-clearance recovery of import or export duties – Communication to the debtor – Creation of a customs debt following the unlawful introduction of goods. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen, made by decision of 31 May 2007, is manifestly inadmissible. |
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-107 

September 7, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4044 Allocation of Assets 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") permit the

terminated * * * Retirement Plan (the "Plan") to allocate its assets otherwise than in accordance with Section 4044 of

the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). You proposed that three participants, including

yourself, be allocated less than the amount allocated pursuant to Section 4044 of the Act. 

Section 4044 itself does not permit waivers of allocable amounts. However, the PBGC would not object if you, as

a substantial owner as that term is defined in Section 4022(b)(6) of the Act, waive part of your accrued benefits. This

would result in more assets being made available for allocation to other participants. 

Also, there is no prohibition in Title IV of the Act against you or any other participant, after receiving your allocable

share of Plan assets, from transferring all or part of that distribution to other participants. However, you may wish to

consult the Internal Revenue Service or private tax counsel with respect to the possible income tax ramifications. 

In your letter you stated that you intended to transfer the [*2] Plan assets to the * * * Defined Contribution Plan.

You should be aware that the allocation requirements of Section 4044 are not satisfied upon termination of a sufficient

plan unless participants are given the option of receiving their allocable share of the Plan's assets as a paid-up annuity

and are given notice of the PBGC's position that any participant who elects a form of distribution other than an annuity

no longer is protected by the termination insurance provisions of the Act. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 111.5 Initial complaint processing; notification (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(1)). ( a ) Upon receipt of a complaint, the General Counsel shall review the complaint for substantial compliance with the technical requirements of 11 CFR 111.4, and, if it complies with those requirements shall within five (5) days after receipt notify each respondent that the complaint has been filed, advise them of Commission compliance procedures, and provide a copy of the complaint.
( b ) If a complaint does not comply with the requirements of 11 CFR 111.4, the General Counsel shall so notify the complainant and any person(s) or entity(ies) identified therein as respondent(s), within the five (5) day period specified in 11 CFR 111.5(a), that no action shall be taken on the basis of that complaint. A copy of the complaint shall be provided with the notification to each respondent.
[45 FR 15120, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 89 FR 217, Jan. 2, 2024]
Limited Power of Attorney - Securities Law Compliance


The undersigned, as an officer or director of Solectron Corporation,
(the "Corporation"), hereby constitutes and appoints Philip Fok,
Michael Grady, or Victoria Miranda the undersigned's true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent to complete and execute such Forms 3, 4
and 5 and other forms as such attorney-in-fact shall, in his or her
discretion, determine to be required or advisable pursuant to Section
16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended) and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or any successor laws and
regulations, as a consequence of the undersigned's ownership,
acquisition or disposition of securities of the Corporation, and to
do all acts necessary in order to file such forms with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or national
association, the Corporation and such other person or agency as the
attorney-in-fact shall deem appropriate. The undersigned hereby
ratifies and confirms all that said attorney-in-fact and agent shall
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


This Limited Power of Attorney is executed at Milpitas, CA, as of the
date set forth below.



				Signature:	S/ Kiran Patel

				Type or Print Name:		Kiran Patel

				Dated: 	May 5, 2003






Witness:

Signature:	S/ Amy O. M. Hom


Type or Print Name:	Amy O. M. Hom


Dated: May 5, 2003