110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–124 

THOMASINA E. JORDAN INDIAN TRIBES OF VIRGINIA 

FEDERAL RECOGNITION ACT OF 2007 

MAY 7, 2007.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 

Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. RAHALL, from the Committee on Natural Resources, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H.R. 1294] 

[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] 

The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred the 

bill (H.R. 1294) to extend Federal recognition to the Chickahominy 

Indian Tribe, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division, 

the Upper Mattaponi Tribe, the Rappahannock Tribe, Inc., the 

Monacan Indian Nation, and the Nansemond Indian Tribe, having 

considered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment 

and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. 

The amendment is as follows: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 

(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thomasina E. Jordan Indian 

Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition Act of 2007’’. 

(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: 

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. 

TITLE I—CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE 

Sec. 101. Findings. 

Sec. 102. Definitions. 

Sec. 103. Federal recognition. 

Sec. 104. Membership; governing documents. 

Sec. 105. Governing body. 

Sec. 106. Reservation of the Tribe. 

Sec. 107. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights. 

TITLE II—CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE—EASTERN DIVISION 

Sec. 201. Findings. 

Sec. 202. Definitions. 

Sec. 203. Federal recognition. 

Sec. 204. Membership; governing documents. 

Sec. 205. Governing body. 

Sec. 206. Reservation of the Tribe. 

Sec. 207. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights. 

TITLE III—UPPER MATTAPONI TRIBE 

Sec. 301. Findings. 

Sec. 302. Definitions. 

Sec. 303. Federal recognition. 

Sec. 304. Membership; governing documents. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
2 

Sec. 305. Governing body. 

Sec. 306. Reservation of the Tribe. 

Sec. 307. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights. 

TITLE IV—RAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE, INC. 

Sec. 401. Findings. 

Sec. 402. Definitions. 

Sec. 403. Federal recognition. 

Sec. 404. Membership; governing documents. 

Sec. 405. Governing body. 

Sec. 406. Reservation of the Tribe. 

Sec. 407. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights. 

TITLE V—MONACAN INDIAN NATION 

Sec. 501. Findings. 

Sec. 502. Definitions. 

Sec. 503. Federal recognition. 

Sec. 504. Membership; governing documents. 

Sec. 505. Governing body. 

Sec. 506. Reservation of the Tribe. 

Sec. 507. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights. 

TITLE VI—NANSEMOND INDIAN TRIBE 

Sec. 601. Findings. 

Sec. 602. Definitions. 

Sec. 603. Federal recognition. 

Sec. 604. Membership; governing documents. 

Sec. 605. Governing body. 

Sec. 606. Reservation of the Tribe. 

Sec. 607. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights. 

TITLE I—CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE 

SEC. 101. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds that—

(1) in 1607, when the English settlers set shore along the Virginia coastline, 

the Chickahominy Indian Tribe was 1 of about 30 tribes that received them; 

(2) in 1614, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe entered into a treaty with Sir 

Thomas Dale, Governor of the Jamestown Colony, under which—

(A) the Chickahominy Indian Tribe agreed to provide 2 bushels of corn 

per man and send warriors to protect the English; and 

(B) Sir Thomas Dale agreed in return to allow the Tribe to continue to 

practice its own tribal governance; 

(3) in 1646, a treaty was signed which forced the Chickahominy from their 

homeland to the area around the York Mattaponi River in present-day King 

William County, leading to the formation of a reservation; 

(4) in 1677, following Bacon’s Rebellion, the Queen of Pamunkey signed the 

Treaty of Middle Plantation on behalf of the Chickahominy; 

(5) in 1702, the Chickahominy were forced from their reservation, which 

caused the loss of a land base; 

(6) in 1711, the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg established a 

grammar school for Indians called Brafferton College; 

(7) a Chickahominy child was 1 of the first Indians to attend Brafferton College; 

(8) in 1750, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe began to migrate from King William County back to the area around the Chickahominy River in New Kent and 

Charles City Counties; 

(9) in 1793, a Baptist missionary named Bradby took refuge with the Chickahominy and took a Chickahominy woman as his wife; 

(10) in 1831, the names of the ancestors of the modern-day Chickahominy Indian Tribe began to appear in the Charles City County census records; 

(11) in 1901, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe formed Samaria Baptist Church; 

(12) from 1901 to 1935, Chickahominy men were assessed a tribal tax so that 

their children could receive an education; 

(13) the Tribe used the proceeds from the tax to build the first Samaria Indian School, buy supplies, and pay a teacher’s salary; 

(14) in 1919, C. Lee Moore, Auditor of Public Accounts for Virginia, told 

Chickahominy Chief O.W. Adkins that he had instructed the Commissioner of 

Revenue for Charles City County to record Chickahominy tribal members on the 

county tax rolls as Indian, and not as white or colored; 

(15) during the period of 1920 through 1930, various Governors of the Commonwealth of Virginia wrote letters of introduction for Chickahominy Chiefs 

who had official business with Federal agencies in Washington, DC; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
3 

(16) in 1934, Chickahominy Chief O.O. Adkins wrote to John Collier, Commissioner of Indian Affairs, requesting money to acquire land for the Chickahominy 

Indian Tribe’s use, to build school, medical, and library facilities and to buy 

tractors, implements, and seed; 

(17) in 1934, John Collier, Commissioner of Indian Affairs, wrote to Chickahominy Chief O.O. Adkins, informing him that Congress had passed the Act of 

June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization Act’’) (25 U.S.C. 

461 et seq.), but had not made the appropriation to fund the Act; 

(18) in 1942, Chickahominy Chief O.O. Adkins wrote to John Collier, Commissioner of Indian Affairs, asking for help in getting the proper racial designation 

on Selective Service records for Chickahominy soldiers; 

(19) in 1943, John Collier, Commissioner of Indian Affairs, asked Douglas S. 

Freeman, editor of the Richmond News-Leader newspaper of Richmond, Virginia, to help Virginia Indians obtain proper racial designation on birth records; 

(20) Collier stated that his office could not officially intervene because it had 

no responsibility for the Virginia Indians, ‘‘as a matter largely of historical accident’’, but was ‘‘interested in them as descendants of the original inhabitants 

of the region’’; 

(21) in 1948, the Veterans’ Education Committee of the Virginia State Board 

of Education approved Samaria Indian School to provide training to veterans; 

(22) that school was established and run by the Chickahominy Indian Tribe; 

(23) in 1950, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe purchased and donated to the 

Charles City County School Board land to be used to build a modern school for 

students of the Chickahominy and other Virginia Indian tribes; 

(24) the Samaria Indian School included students in grades 1 through 8; 

(25) In 1961, Senator Sam Ervin, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, requested Chickahominy Chief O.O. Adkins to provide assistance in analyzing the status of the 

constitutional rights of Indians ‘‘in your area’’; 

(26) in 1967, the Charles City County school board closed Samaria Indian 

School and converted the school to a countywide primary school as a step toward full school integration of Indian and non-Indian students; 

(27) in 1972, the Charles City County school board began receiving funds 

under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 

458aa et seq.) on behalf of Chickahominy students, which funding is provided 

as of the date of enactment of this Act under title V of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458aaa et seq.); 

(28) in 1974, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe bought land and built a tribal 

center using monthly pledges from tribal members to finance the transactions; 

(29) in 1983, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe was granted recognition as an 

Indian tribe by the Commonwealth of Virginia, along with 5 other Indian tribes; 

and 

(30) in 1985, Governor Gerald Baliles was the special guest at an intertribal 

Thanksgiving Day dinner hosted by the Chickahominy Indian Tribe. 

SEC. 102. DEFINITIONS. 

In this title: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Interior. 

(2) TRIBAL MEMBER.—The term ‘‘tribal member’’ means—

(A) an individual who is an enrolled member of the Tribe as of the date 

of enactment of this Act; and 

(B) an individual who has been placed on the membership rolls of the 

Tribe in accordance with this title. 

(3) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Chickahominy Indian Tribe. 

SEC. 103. FEDERAL RECOGNITION. 

(a) FEDERAL RECOGNITION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Federal recognition is extended to the Tribe. 

(2) APPLICABILITY OF LAWS.—All laws (including regulations) of the United 

States of general applicability to Indians or nations, Indian tribes, or bands of 

Indians (including the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.)) that are 

not inconsistent with this title shall be applicable to the Tribe and tribal members. 

(b) FEDERAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of enactment of this Act, the Tribe 

and tribal members shall be eligible for all services and benefits provided by 

the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian tribes without regard 

to—

(A) the existence of a reservation for the Tribe; or 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
4 

(B) the location of the residence of any tribal member on or near any Indian reservation. 

(2) SERVICE AREA.—For the purpose of the delivery of Federal services to tribal members, the service area of the Tribe shall be considered to be the area 

comprised of New Kent County, James City County, Charles City County, and 

Henrico County, Virginia. 

SEC. 104. MEMBERSHIP; GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. 

The membership roll and governing documents of the Tribe shall be the most recent membership roll and governing documents, respectively, submitted by the Tribe 

to the Secretary before the date of enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 105. GOVERNING BODY. 

The governing body of the Tribe shall be— (1) the governing body of the Tribe in place as of the date of enactment of 

this Act; or 

(2) any subsequent governing body elected in accordance with the election 

procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

SEC. 106. RESERVATION OF THE TRIBE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—If, not later than 25 years after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Tribe transfers to the Secretary land within the boundaries of New Kent 

County, James City County, Charles City County, or Henrico County, Virginia, the 

Secretary shall take the land into trust for the benefit of the Tribe. Any land taken 

into trust for the benefit of the Tribe pursuant to this subsection shall be considered 

part of the reservation of the Tribe. 

(b) GAMING.—The Tribe may not conduct gaming activities as a matter of claimed 

inherent authority or under the authority of any Federal law, including the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) or under any regulations thereunder promulgated by the Secretary or the National Indian Gaming Commission. 

SEC. 107. HUNTING, FISHING, TRAPPING, GATHERING, AND WATER RIGHTS. 

Nothing in this title expands, reduces, or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, or water rights of the Tribe and members of the Tribe. 

TITLE II—CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE— EASTERN DIVISION 

SEC. 201. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds that— (1) in 1607, when the English settlers set shore along the Virginia coastline, 

the Chickahominy Indian Tribe was 1 of about 30 tribes that received them; 

(2) in 1614, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe entered into a treaty with Sir 

Thomas Dale, Governor of the Jamestown Colony, under which— (A) the Chickahominy Indian Tribe agreed to provide 2 bushels of corn 

per man and send warriors to protect the English; and 

(B) Sir Thomas Dale agreed in return to allow the Tribe to continue to 

practice its own tribal governance; 

(3) in 1646, a treaty was signed which forced the Chickahominy from their 

homeland to the area around the York River in present-day King William County, leading to the formation of a reservation; 

(4) in 1677, following Bacon’s Rebellion, the Queen of Pamunkey signed the 

Treaty of Middle Plantation on behalf of the Chickahominy; 

(5) in 1702, the Chickahominy were forced from their reservation, which 

caused the loss of a land base; 

(6) in 1711, the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg established a 

grammar school for Indians called Brafferton College; 

(7) a Chickahominy child was 1 of the first Indians to attend Brafferton College; 

(8) in 1750, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe began to migrate from King William County back to the area around the Chickahominy River in New Kent and 

Charles City Counties; 

(9) in 1793, a Baptist missionary named Bradby took refuge with the Chickahominy and took a Chickahominy woman as his wife; 

(10) in 1831, the names of the ancestors of the modern-day Chickahominy Indian Tribe began to appear in the Charles City County census records; 

(11) in 1870, a census revealed an enclave of Indians in New Kent County 

that is believed to be the beginning of the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern 

Division; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
5 

(12) other records were destroyed when the New Kent County courthouse was 

burned, leaving a State census as the only record covering that period; 

(13) in 1901, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe formed Samaria Baptist Church; 

(14) from 1901 to 1935, Chickahominy men were assessed a tribal tax so that 

their children could receive an education; 

(15) the Tribe used the proceeds from the tax to build the first Samaria Indian School, buy supplies, and pay a teacher’s salary; 

(16) in 1910, a 1-room school covering grades 1 through 8 was established in 

New Kent County for the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division; 

(17) during the period of 1920 through 1921, the Chickahominy Indian 

Tribe—Eastern Division began forming a tribal government; 

(18) E.P. Bradby, the founder of the Tribe, was elected to be Chief; 

(19) in 1922, Tsena Commocko Baptist Church was organized; 

(20) in 1925, a certificate of incorporation was issued to the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division; 

(21) in 1950, the 1-room Indian school in New Kent County was closed and 

students were bused to Samaria Indian School in Charles City County; 

(22) in 1967, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe and the Chickahominy Indian 

Tribe—Eastern Division lost their schools as a result of the required integration 

of students; 

(23) during the period of 1982 through 1984, Tsena Commocko Baptist 

Church built a new sanctuary to accommodate church growth; 

(24) in 1983 the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division was granted 

State recognition along with 5 other Virginia Indian tribes; 

(25) in 1985—

(A) the Virginia Council on Indians was organized as a State agency; and 

(B) the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division was granted a seat 

on the Council; 

(26) in 1988, a nonprofit organization known as the ‘‘United Indians of Virginia’’ was formed; and 

(27) Chief Marvin ‘‘Strongoak’’ Bradby of the Eastern Band of the Chickahominy presently chairs the organization. 

SEC. 202. DEFINITIONS. 

In this title: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Interior. 

(2) TRIBAL MEMBER.—The term ‘‘tribal member’’ means—

(A) an individual who is an enrolled member of the Tribe as of the date 

of enactment of this Act; and 

(B) an individual who has been placed on the membership rolls of the 

Tribe in accordance with this title. 

(3) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern 

Division. 

SEC. 203. FEDERAL RECOGNITION. 

(a) FEDERAL RECOGNITION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Federal recognition is extended to the Tribe. 

(2) APPLICABILITY OF LAWS.—All laws (including regulations) of the United 

States of general applicability to Indians or nations, Indian tribes, or bands of 

Indians (including the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.)) that are 

not inconsistent with this title shall be applicable to the Tribe and tribal members. 

(b) FEDERAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of enactment of this Act, the Tribe 

and tribal members shall be eligible for all future services and benefits provided 

by the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian tribes without regard 

to—

(A) the existence of a reservation for the Tribe; or 

(B) the location of the residence of any tribal member on or near any Indian reservation. 

(2) SERVICE AREA.—For the purpose of the delivery of Federal services to tribal members, the service area of the Tribe shall be considered to be the area 

comprised of New Kent County, James City County, Charles City County, and 

Henrico County, Virginia. 

SEC. 204. MEMBERSHIP; GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. 

The membership roll and governing documents of the Tribe shall be the most recent membership roll and governing documents, respectively, submitted by the Tribe 

to the Secretary before the date of enactment of this Act. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
6 

SEC. 205. GOVERNING BODY. 

The governing body of the Tribe shall be—

(1) the governing body of the Tribe in place as of the date of enactment of 

this Act; or 

(2) any subsequent governing body elected in accordance with the election 

procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

SEC. 206. RESERVATION OF THE TRIBE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—If, not later than 25 years after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Tribe transfers to the Secretary any land within the boundaries of New 

Kent County, James City County, Charles City County, or Henrico County, Virginia, 

the Secretary shall take the land into trust for the benefit of the Tribe. Any land 

taken into trust for the benefit of the Tribe pursuant to this subsection shall be considered part of the reservation of the Tribe. 

(b) GAMING.—The Tribe may not conduct gaming activities as a matter of claimed 

inherent authority or under the authority of any Federal law, including the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) or under any regulations thereunder promulgated by the Secretary or the National Indian Gaming Commission. 

SEC. 207. HUNTING, FISHING, TRAPPING, GATHERING, AND WATER RIGHTS. 

Nothing in this title expands, reduces, or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, or water rights of the Tribe and members of the Tribe. 

TITLE III—UPPER MATTAPONI TRIBE 

SEC. 301. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds that—

(1) during the period of 1607 through 1646, the Chickahominy Indian 

Tribes—

(A) lived approximately 20 miles from Jamestown; and 

(B) were significantly involved in English-Indian affairs; 

(2) Mattaponi Indians, who later joined the Chickahominy Indians, lived a 

greater distance from Jamestown; 

(3) in 1646, the Chickahominy Indians moved to Mattaponi River basin, away 

from the English; 

(4) in 1661, the Chickahominy Indians sold land at a place known as ‘‘the 

cliffs’’ on the Mattaponi River; 

(5) in 1669, the Chickahominy Indians—

(A) appeared in the Virginia Colony’s census of Indian bowmen; and 

(B) lived in ‘‘New Kent’’ County, which included the Mattaponi River 

basin at that time; 

(6) in 1677, the Chickahominy and Mattaponi Indians were subjects of the 

Queen of Pamunkey, who was a signatory to the Treaty of 1677 with the King 

of England; 

(7) in 1683, after a Mattaponi town was attacked by Seneca Indians, the 

Mattaponi Indians took refuge with the Chickahominy Indians, and the history 

of the 2 groups was intertwined for many years thereafter; 

(8) in 1695, the Chickahominy and Mattaponi Indians—

(A) were assigned a reservation by the Virginia Colony; and 

(B) traded land of the reservation for land at the place known as ‘‘the 

cliffs’’ (which, as of the date of enactment of this Act, is the Mattaponi Indian Reservation), which had been owned by the Mattaponi Indians before 

1661; 

(9) in 1711, a Chickahominy boy attended the Indian School at the College 

of William and Mary; 

(10) in 1726, the Virginia Colony discontinued funding of interpreters for the 

Chickahominy and Mattaponi Indian Tribes; 

(11) James Adams, who served as an interpreter to the Indian tribes known 

as of the date of enactment of this Act as the ‘‘Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe’’

and ‘‘Chickahominy Indian Tribe’’, elected to stay with the Upper Mattaponi Indians; 

(12) today, a majority of the Upper Mattaponi Indians have ‘‘Adams’’ as their 

surname; 

(13) in 1787, Thomas Jefferson, in Notes on the Commonwealth of Virginia, 

mentioned the Mattaponi Indians on a reservation in King William County and 

said that Chickahominy Indians were ‘‘blended’’ with the Mattaponi Indians 

and nearby Pamunkey Indians; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
7 

(14) in 1850, the census of the United States revealed a nucleus of approximately 10 families, all ancestral to modern Upper Mattaponi Indians, living in 

central King William County, Virginia, approximately 10 miles from the reservation; 

(15) during the period of 1853 through 1884, King William County marriage 

records listed Upper Mattaponis as ‘‘Indians’’ in marrying people residing on the 

reservation; 

(16) during the period of 1884 through the present, county marriage records 

usually refer to Upper Mattaponis as ‘‘Indians’’; 

(17) in 1901, Smithsonian anthropologist James Mooney heard about the 

Upper Mattaponi Indians but did not visit them; 

(18) in 1928, University of Pennsylvania anthropologist Frank Speck published a book on modern Virginia Indians with a section on the Upper 

Mattaponis; 

(19) from 1929 until 1930, the leadership of the Upper Mattaponi Indians opposed the use of a ‘‘colored’’ designation in the 1930 United States census and 

won a compromise in which the Indian ancestry of the Upper Mattaponis was 

recorded but questioned; 

(20) during the period of 1942 through 1945—

(A) the leadership of the Upper Mattaponi Indians, with the help of 

Frank Speck and others, fought against the induction of young men of the 

Tribe into ‘‘colored’’ units in the Armed Forces of the United States; and 

(B) a tribal roll for the Upper Mattaponi Indians was compiled; 

(21) from 1945 to 1946, negotiations took place to admit some of the young 

people of the Upper Mattaponi to high schools for Federal Indians (especially 

at Cherokee) because no high school coursework was available for Indians in 

Virginia schools; and 

(22) in 1983, the Upper Mattaponi Indians applied for and won State recognition as an Indian tribe. 

SEC. 302. DEFINITIONS. 

In this title: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Interior. 

(2) TRIBAL MEMBER.—The term ‘‘tribal member’’ means—

(A) an individual who is an enrolled member of the Tribe as of the date 

of enactment of this Act; and 

(B) an individual who has been placed on the membership rolls of the 

Tribe in accordance with this title. 

(3) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Upper Mattaponi Tribe. 

SEC. 303. FEDERAL RECOGNITION. 

(a) FEDERAL RECOGNITION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Federal recognition is extended to the Tribe. 

(2) APPLICABILITY OF LAWS.—All laws (including regulations) of the United 

States of general applicability to Indians or nations, Indian tribes, or bands of 

Indians (including the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.)) that are 

not inconsistent with this title shall be applicable to the Tribe and tribal members. 

(b) FEDERAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of enactment of this Act, the Tribe 

and tribal members shall be eligible for all services and benefits provided by 

the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian tribes without regard 

to—

(A) the existence of a reservation for the Tribe; or 

(B) the location of the residence of any tribal member on or near any Indian reservation. 

(2) SERVICE AREA.—For the purpose of the delivery of Federal services to tribal members, the service area of the Tribe shall be considered to be the area 

within 25 miles of the Sharon Indian School at 13383 King William Road, King 

William County, Virginia. 

SEC. 304. MEMBERSHIP; GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. 

The membership roll and governing documents of the Tribe shall be the most recent membership roll and governing documents, respectively, submitted by the Tribe 

to the Secretary before the date of enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 305. GOVERNING BODY. 

The governing body of the Tribe shall be—

(1) the governing body of the Tribe in place as of the date of enactment of 

this Act; or 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
8 

(2) any subsequent governing body elected in accordance with the election 

procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

SEC. 306. RESERVATION OF THE TRIBE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—If, not later than 25 years after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Tribe transfers to the Secretary land within the boundaries of King William 

County, Caroline County, Hanover County, King and Queen County, and New Kent 

County, Virginia, the Secretary shall take the land into trust for the benefit of the 

Tribe. Any land taken into trust for the benefit of the Tribe pursuant to this subsection shall be considered part of the reservation of the Tribe. 

(b) GAMING.—The Tribe may not conduct gaming activities as a matter of claimed 

inherent authority or under the authority of any Federal law, including the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) or under any regulations thereunder promulgated by the Secretary or the National Indian Gaming Commission. 

SEC. 307. HUNTING, FISHING, TRAPPING, GATHERING, AND WATER RIGHTS. 

Nothing in this title expands, reduces, or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, or water rights of the Tribe and members of the Tribe. 

TITLE IV—RAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE, INC. 

SEC. 401. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds that—

(1) during the initial months after Virginia was settled, the Rappahannock Indians had 3 encounters with Captain John Smith; 

(2) the first encounter occurred when the Rappahannock weroance (headman)—

(A) traveled to Quiyocohannock (a principal town across the James River 

from Jamestown), where he met with Smith to determine whether Smith 

had been the ‘‘great man’’ who had previously sailed into the Rappahannock 

River, killed a Rappahannock weroance, and kidnapped Rappahannock people; and 

(B) determined that Smith was too short to be that ‘‘great man’’; 

(3) on a second meeting, during John Smith’s captivity (December 16, 1607 

to January 8, 1608), Smith was taken to the Rappahannock principal village to 

show the people that Smith was not the ‘‘great man’’; 

(4) a third meeting took place during Smith’s exploration of the Chesapeake 

Bay (July to September 1608), when, after the Moraughtacund Indians had stolen 3 women from the Rappahannock King, Smith was prevailed upon to facilitate a peaceful truce between the Rappahannock and the Moraughtacund Indians; 

(5) in the settlement, Smith had the 2 Indian tribes meet on the spot of their 

first fight; 

(6) when it was established that both groups wanted peace, Smith told the 

Rappahannock King to select which of the 3 stolen women he wanted; 

(7) the Moraughtacund King was given second choice among the 2 remaining 

women, and Mosco, a Wighcocomoco (on the Potomac River) guide, was given 

the third woman; 

(8) in 1645, Captain William Claiborne tried unsuccessfully to establish treaty 

relations with the Rappahannocks, as the Rappahannocks had not participated 

in the Pamunkey-led uprising in 1644, and the English wanted to ‘‘treat with 

the Rappahannocks or any other Indians not in amity with Opechancanough, 

concerning serving the county against the Pamunkeys’’; 

(9) in April 1651, the Rappahannocks conveyed a tract of land to an English 

settler, Colonel Morre Fauntleroy; 

(10) the deed for the conveyance was signed by Accopatough, weroance of the 

Rappahannock Indians; 

(11) in September 1653, Lancaster County signed a treaty with Rappahannock Indians, the terms of which treaty—

(A) gave Rappahannocks the rights of Englishmen in the county court; 

and 

(B) attempted to make the Rappahannocks more accountable under 

English law; 

(12) in September 1653, Lancaster County defined and marked the bounds of 

its Indian settlements; 

(13) according to the Lancaster clerk of court, ‘‘the tribe called the great 

Rappahannocks lived on the Rappahannock Creek just across the river above 

Tappahannock’’; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
9 

(14) in September 1656, (Old) Rappahannock County (which, as of the date 

of enactment of this Act, is comprised of Richmond and Essex Counties, Virginia) signed a treaty with Rappahannock Indians that— (A) mirrored the Lancaster County treaty from 1653; and 

(B) stated that— (i) Rappahannocks were to be rewarded, in Roanoke, for returning 

English fugitives; and 

(ii) the English encouraged the Rappahannocks to send their children 

to live among the English as servants, who the English promised would 

be well-treated; 

(15) in 1658, the Virginia Assembly revised a 1652 Act stating that ‘‘there be 

no grants of land to any Englishman whatsoever de futuro until the Indians be 

first served with the proportion of 50 acres of land for each bowman’’; 

(16) in 1669, the colony conducted a census of Virginia Indians; 

(17) as of the date of that census— (A) the majority of the Rappahannocks were residing at their hunting village on the north side of the Mattaponi River; and 

(B) at the time of the visit, census-takers were counting only the Indian 

tribes along the rivers, which explains why only 30 Rappahannock bowmen 

were counted on that river; 

(18) the Rappahannocks used the hunting village on the north side of the 

Mattaponi River as their primary residence until the Rappahannocks were removed in 1684; 

(19) in May 1677, the Treaty of Middle Plantation was signed with England; 

(20) the Pamunkey Queen Cockacoeske signed on behalf of the 

Rappahannocks, ‘‘who were supposed to be her tributaries’’, but before the treaty could be ratified, the Queen of Pamunkey complained to the Virginia Colonial 

Council ‘‘that she was having trouble with Rappahannocks and Chickahominies, 

supposedly tributaries of hers’’; 

(21) in November 1682, the Virginia Colonial Council established a reservation for the Rappahannock Indians of 3,474 acres ‘‘about the town where they 

dwelt’’; 

(22) the Rappahannock ‘‘town’’ was the hunting village on the north side of 

the Mattaponi River, where the Rappahannocks had lived throughout the 

1670s; 

(23) the acreage allotment of the reservation was based on the 1658 Indian 

land act, which translates into a bowman population of 70, or an approximate 

total Rappahannock population of 350; 

(24) in 1683, following raids by Iroquoian warriors on both Indian and 

English settlements, the Virginia Colonial Council ordered the Rappahannocks 

to leave their reservation and unite with the Nanzatico Indians at Nanzatico 

Indian Town, which was located across and up the Rappahannock River some 

30 miles; 

(25) between 1687 and 1699, the Rappahannocks migrated out of Nanzatico, 

returning to the south side of the Rappahannock River at Portobacco Indian 

Town; 

(26) in 1706, by order of Essex County, Lieutenant Richard Covington ‘‘escorted’’ the Portobaccos and Rappahannocks out of Portobacco Indian Town, out 

of Essex County, and into King and Queen County where they settled along the 

ridgeline between the Rappahannock and Mattaponi Rivers, the site of their ancient hunting village and 1682 reservation; 

(27) during the 1760s, 3 Rappahannock girls were raised on Thomas Nelson’s 

Bleak Hill Plantation in King William County; 

(28) of those girls—

(A) 1 married a Saunders man; 

(B) 1 married a Johnson man; and 

(C) 1 had 2 children, Edmund and Carter Nelson, fathered by Thomas 

Cary Nelson; 

(29) in the 19th century, those Saunders, Johnson, and Nelson families are 

among the core Rappahannock families from which the modern Tribe traces its 

descent; 

(30) in 1819 and 1820, Edward Bird, John Bird (and his wife), Carter Nelson, 

Edmund Nelson, and Carter Spurlock (all Rappahannock ancestors) were listed 

on the tax roles of King and Queen County and taxed at the county poor rate; 

(31) Edmund Bird was added to the tax roles in 1821; 

(32) those tax records are significant documentation because the great majority of pre-1864 records for King and Queen County were destroyed by fire; 

(33) beginning in 1819, and continuing through the 1880s, there was a solid 

Rappahannock presence in the membership at Upper Essex Baptist Church; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
10 

(34) that was the first instance of conversion to Christianity by at least some 

Rappahannock Indians; 

(35) while 26 identifiable and traceable Rappahannock surnames appear on 

the pre-1863 membership list, and 28 were listed on the 1863 membership roster, the number of surnames listed had declined to 12 in 1878 and had risen 

only slightly to 14 by 1888; 

(36) a reason for the decline is that in 1870, a Methodist circuit rider, Joseph 

Mastin, secured funds to purchase land and construct St. Stephens Baptist 

Church for the Rappahannocks living nearby in Caroline County; 

(37) Mastin referred to the Rappahannocks during the period of 1850 to 1870 as ‘‘Indians, having a great need for moral and Christian guidance’’; 

(38) St. Stephens was the dominant tribal church until the Rappahannock Indian Baptist Church was established in 1964; 

(39) at both churches, the core Rappahannock family names of Bird, Clarke, 

Fortune, Johnson, Nelson, Parker, and Richardson predominate; 

(40) during the early 1900’s, James Mooney, noted anthropologist, maintained 

correspondence with the Rappahannocks, surveying them and instructing them 

on how to formalize their tribal government; 

(41) in November 1920, Speck visited the Rappahannocks and assisted them 

in organizing the fight for their sovereign rights; 

(42) in 1921, the Rappahannocks were granted a charter from the Commonwealth of Virginia formalizing their tribal government; 

(43) Speck began a professional relationship with the Tribe that would last 

more than 30 years and document Rappahannock history and traditions as 

never before; 

(44) in April 1921, Rappahannock Chief George Nelson asked the Governor 

of Virginia, Westmoreland Davis, to forward a proclamation to the President of 

the United States, along with an appended list of tribal members and a handwritten copy of the proclamation itself; 

(45) the letter concerned Indian freedom of speech and assembly nationwide; 

(46) in 1922, the Rappahannocks established a formal school at Lloyds, Essex 

County, Virginia; 

(47) prior to establishment of the school, Rappahannock children were taught 

by a tribal member in Central Point, Caroline County, Virginia; 

(48) in December 1923, Rappahannock Chief George Nelson testified before 

Congress appealing for a $50,000 appropriation to establish an Indian school in 

Virginia; 

(49) in 1930, the Rappahannocks were engaged in an ongoing dispute with 

the Commonwealth of Virginia and the United States Census Bureau about 

their classification in the 1930 Federal census; 

(50) in January 1930, Rappahannock Chief Otho S. Nelson wrote to Leon 

Truesdell, Chief Statistician of the United States Census Bureau, asking that 

the 218 enrolled Rappahannocks be listed as Indians; 

(51) in February 1930, Truesdell replied to Nelson saying that ‘‘special instructions’’ were being given about classifying Indians; 

(52) in April 1930, Nelson wrote to William M. Steuart at the Census Bureau 

asking about the enumerators’ failure to classify his people as Indians, saying 

that enumerators had not asked the question about race when they interviewed 

his people; 

(53) in a followup letter to Truesdell, Nelson reported that the enumerators 

were ‘‘flatly denying’’ his people’s request to be listed as Indians and that the 

race question was completely avoided during interviews; 

(54) the Rappahannocks had spoken with Caroline and Essex County enumerators, and with John M.W. Green at that point, without success; 

(55) Nelson asked Truesdell to list people as Indians if he sent a list of members; 

(56) the matter was settled by William Steuart, who concluded that the Bureau’s rule was that people of Indian descent could be classified as ‘‘Indian’’ only 

if Indian ‘‘blood’’ predominated and ‘‘Indian’’ identity was accepted in the local 

community; 

(57) the Virginia Vital Statistics Bureau classed all nonreservation Indians as 

‘‘Negro’’, and it failed to see why ‘‘an exception should be made’’ for the 

Rappahannocks; 

(58) therefore, in 1925, the Indian Rights Association took on the Rappahannock case to assist the Rappahannocks in fighting for their recognition and 

rights as an Indian tribe; 

(59) during the Second World War, the Pamunkeys, Mattaponis, 

Chickahominies, and Rappahannocks had to fight the draft boards with respect 

to their racial identities; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
11 

(60) the Virginia Vital Statistics Bureau insisted that certain Indian draftees 

be inducted into Negro units; 

(61) finally, 3 Rappahannocks were convicted of violating the Federal draft 

laws and, after spending time in a Federal prison, were granted conscientious 

objector status and served out the remainder of the war working in military 

hospitals; 

(62) in 1943, Frank Speck noted that there were approximately 25 communities of Indians left in the Eastern United States that were entitled to Indian 

classification, including the Rappahannocks; 

(63) in the 1940s, Leon Truesdell, Chief Statistician, of the United States 

Census Bureau, listed 118 members in the Rappahannock Tribe in the Indian 

population of Virginia; 

(64) on April 25, 1940, the Office of Indian Affairs of the Department of the 

Interior included the Rappahannocks on a list of Indian tribes classified by 

State and by agency; 

(65) in 1948, the Smithsonian Institution Annual Report included an article 

by William Harlen Gilbert entitled, ‘‘Surviving Indian Groups of the Eastern 

United States’’, which included and described the Rappahannock Tribe; 

(66) in the late 1940s and early 1950s, the Rappahannocks operated a school 

at Indian Neck; 

(67) the State agreed to pay a tribal teacher to teach 10 students bused by 

King and Queen County to Sharon Indian School in King William County, Virginia; 

(68) in 1965, Rappahannock students entered Marriott High School (a white 

public school) by executive order of the Governor of Virginia; 

(69) in 1972, the Rappahannocks worked with the Coalition of Eastern Native 

Americans to fight for Federal recognition; 

(70) in 1979, the Coalition established a pottery and artisans company, operating with other Virginia tribes; 

(71) in 1980, the Rappahannocks received funding through the Administration 

for Native Americans of the Department of Health and Human Services to develop an economic program for the Tribe; and 

(72) in 1983, the Rappahannocks received State recognition as an Indian 

tribe. 

SEC. 402. DEFINITIONS. 

In this title: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Interior. 

(2) TRIBAL MEMBER.—The term ‘‘tribal member’’ means— (A) an individual who is an enrolled member of the Tribe as of the date 

of enactment of this Act; and 

(B) an individual who has been placed on the membership rolls of the 

Tribe in accordance with this title. 

(3) TRIBE.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the organization possessing 

the legal name Rappahannock Tribe, Inc. 

(B) EXCLUSIONS.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ does not include any other Indian 

tribe, subtribe, band, or splinter group the members of which represent 

themselves as Rappahannock Indians. 

SEC. 403. FEDERAL RECOGNITION. 

(a) FEDERAL RECOGNITION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Federal recognition is extended to the Tribe. 

(2) APPLICABILITY OF LAWS.—All laws (including regulations) of the United 

States of general applicability to Indians or nations, Indian tribes, or bands of 

Indians (including the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.)) that are 

not inconsistent with this title shall be applicable to the Tribe and tribal members. 

(b) FEDERAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of enactment of this Act, the Tribe 

and tribal members shall be eligible for all services and benefits provided by 

the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian tribes without regard 

to—

(A) the existence of a reservation for the Tribe; or 

(B) the location of the residence of any tribal member on or near any Indian reservation. 

(2) SERVICE AREA.—For the purpose of the delivery of Federal services to tribal members, the service area of the Tribe shall be considered to be the area 

comprised of King and Queen County, Caroline County, Essex County, Spotsylvania County, Stafford County, and Richmond County, Virginia. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
12 

SEC. 404. MEMBERSHIP; GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. 

The membership roll and governing documents of the Tribe shall be the most recent membership roll and governing documents, respectively, submitted by the Tribe 

to the Secretary before the date of enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 405. GOVERNING BODY. 

The governing body of the Tribe shall be—

(1) the governing body of the Tribe in place as of the date of enactment of 

this Act; or 

(2) any subsequent governing body elected in accordance with the election 

procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

SEC. 406. RESERVATION OF THE TRIBE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—If, not later than 25 years after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Tribe transfers to the Secretary land within the boundaries of King and 

Queen County, Stafford County, Spotsylvania County, Richmond County, Essex 

County, and Caroline County, Virginia, the Secretary shall take the land into trust 

for the benefit of the Tribe. Any land taken into trust for the benefit of the Tribe 

pursuant to this subsection shall be considered part of the reservation of the Tribe. 

(b) GAMING.—The Tribe may not conduct gaming activities as a matter of claimed 

inherent authority or under the authority of any Federal law, including the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) or under any regulations thereunder promulgated by the Secretary or the National Indian Gaming Commission. 

SEC. 407. HUNTING, FISHING, TRAPPING, GATHERING, AND WATER RIGHTS. 

Nothing in this title expands, reduces, or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, or water rights of the Tribe and members of the Tribe. 

TITLE V—MONACAN INDIAN NATION 

SEC. 501. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds that—

(1) In 1677, the Monacan Tribe signed the Treaty of Middle Plantation between Charles II of England and 12 Indian ‘‘Kings and Chief Men’’; 

(2) in 1722, in the Treaty of Albany, Governor Spotswood negotiated to save 

the Virginia Indians from extinction at the hands of the Iroquois; 

(3) specifically mentioned in the negotiations were the Monacan tribes of the 

Totero (Tutelo), Saponi, Ocheneeches (Occaneechi), Stengenocks, and 

Meipontskys; 

(4) in 1790, the first national census recorded Benjamin Evans and Robert 

Johns, both ancestors of the present Monacan community, listed as ‘‘white’’ with 

mulatto children; 

(5) in 1782, tax records also began for those families; 

(6) in 1850, the United States census recorded 29 families, mostly large, with 

Monacan surnames, the members of which are genealogically related to the 

present community; 

(7) in 1870, a log structure was built at the Bear Mountain Indian Mission; 

(8) in 1908, the structure became an Episcopal Mission and, as of the date 

of enactment of this Act, the structure is listed as a landmark on the National 

Register of Historic Places; 

(9) in 1920, 304 Amherst Indians were identified in the United States census; 

(10) from 1930 through 1931, numerous letters from Monacans to the Bureau 

of the Census resulted from the decision of Dr. Walter Plecker, former head of 

the Bureau of Vital Statistics of the State of Virginia, not to allow Indians to 

register as Indians for the 1930 census; 

(11) the Monacans eventually succeeded in being allowed to claim their race, 

albeit with an asterisk attached to a note from Dr. Plecker stating that there 

were no Indians in Virginia; 

(12) in 1947, D’Arcy McNickle, a Salish Indian, saw some of the children at 

the Amherst Mission and requested that the Cherokee Agency visit them because they appeared to be Indian; 

(13) that letter was forwarded to the Department of the Interior, Office of Indian Affairs, Chicago, Illinois; 

(14) Chief Jarrett Blythe of the Eastern Band of Cherokee did visit the Mission and wrote that he ‘‘would be willing to accept these children in the Cherokee school’’; 

(15) in 1979, a Federal Coalition of Eastern Native Americans established the 

entity known as ‘‘Monacan Co-operative Pottery’’ at the Amherst Mission; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
13 

(16) some important pieces were produced at Monacan Co-operative Pottery, 

including a piece that was sold to the Smithsonian Institution; 

(17) the Mattaponi-Pamunkey-Monacan Consortium, established in 1981, has 

since been organized as a nonprofit corporation that serves as a vehicle to obtain funds for those Indian tribes from the Department of Labor under Native 

American programs; 

(18) in 1989, the Monacan Tribe was recognized by the State of Virginia, 

which enabled the Tribe to apply for grants and participate in other programs; 

and 

(19) in 1993, the Monacan Tribe received tax-exempt status as a nonprofit 

corporation from the Internal Revenue Service. 

SEC. 502. DEFINITIONS. 

In this title: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Interior. 

(2) TRIBAL MEMBER.—The term ‘‘tribal member’’ means—

(A) an individual who is an enrolled member of the Tribe as of the date 

of enactment of this Act; and 

(B) an individual who has been placed on the membership rolls of the 

Tribe in accordance with this title. 

(3) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Monacan Indian Nation. 

SEC. 503. FEDERAL RECOGNITION. 

(a) FEDERAL RECOGNITION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Federal recognition is extended to the Tribe. 

(2) APPLICABILITY OF LAWS.—All laws (including regulations) of the United 

States of general applicability to Indians or nations, Indian tribes, or bands of 

Indians (including the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.)) that are 

not inconsistent with this title shall be applicable to the Tribe and tribal members. 

(b) FEDERAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of enactment of this Act, the Tribe 

and tribal members shall be eligible for all services and benefits provided by 

the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian tribes without regard 

to—

(A) the existence of a reservation for the Tribe; or 

(B) the location of the residence of any tribal member on or near any Indian reservation. 

(2) SERVICE AREA.—For the purpose of the delivery of Federal services to tribal members, the service area of the Tribe shall be considered to be the area 

comprised of all land within 25 miles from the center of Amherst, Virginia. 

SEC. 504. MEMBERSHIP; GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. 

The membership roll and governing documents of the Tribe shall be the most recent membership roll and governing documents, respectively, submitted by the Tribe 

to the Secretary before the date of enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 505. GOVERNING BODY. 

The governing body of the Tribe shall be—

(1) the governing body of the Tribe in place as of the date of enactment of 

this Act; or 

(2) any subsequent governing body elected in accordance with the election 

procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

SEC. 506. RESERVATION OF THE TRIBE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—If, not later than 25 years after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Tribe transfers to the Secretary any land within the boundaries of Amherst 

County, Virginia, the Secretary shall take the land into trust for the benefit of the 

Tribe. Any land taken into trust for the benefit of the Tribe pursuant to this subsection shall be considered part of the reservation of the Tribe. 

(b) GAMING.—The Tribe may not conduct gaming activities as a matter of claimed 

inherent authority or under the authority of any Federal law, including the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) or under any regulations thereunder promulgated by the Secretary or the National Indian Gaming Commission. 

SEC. 507. HUNTING, FISHING, TRAPPING, GATHERING, AND WATER RIGHTS. 

Nothing in this title expands, reduces, or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, or water rights of the Tribe and members of the Tribe. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
14 

TITLE VI—NANSEMOND INDIAN TRIBE 

SEC. 601. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds that—

(1) from 1607 until 1646, Nansemond Indians—

(A) lived approximately 30 miles from Jamestown; and 

(B) were significantly involved in English-Indian affairs; 

(2) after 1646, there were 2 sections of Nansemonds in communication with 

each other, the Christianized Nansemonds in Norfolk County, who lived as citizens, and the traditionalist Nansemonds, who lived further west; 

(3) in 1638, according to an entry in a 17th century sermon book still owned 

by the Chief’s family, a Norfolk County Englishman married a Nansemond 

woman; 

(4) that man and woman are lineal ancestors of all of members of the 

Nansemond Indian tribe alive as of the date of enactment of this Act, as are 

some of the traditionalist Nansemonds; 

(5) in 1669, the 2 Nansemond sections appeared in Virginia Colony’s census 

of Indian bowmen; 

(6) in 1677, Nansemond Indians were signatories to the Treaty of 1677 with 

the King of England; 

(7) in 1700 and 1704, the Nansemonds and other Virginia Indian tribes were 

prevented by Virginia Colony from making a separate peace with the Iroquois; 

(8) Virginia represented those Indian tribes in the final Treaty of Albany, 

1722; 

(9) in 1711, a Nansemond boy attended the Indian School at the College of 

William and Mary; 

(10) in 1727, Norfolk County granted William Bass and his kinsmen the ‘‘Indian privileges’’ of clearing swamp land and bearing arms (which privileges 

were forbidden to other nonwhites) because of their Nansemond ancestry, which 

meant that Bass and his kinsmen were original inhabitants of that land; 

(11) in 1742, Norfolk County issued a certificate of Nansemond descent to 

William Bass; 

(12) from the 1740s to the 1790s, the traditionalist section of the Nansemond 

tribe, 40 miles west of the Christianized Nansemonds, was dealing with reservation land; 

(13) the last surviving members of that section sold out in 1792 with the permission of the State of Virginia; 

(14) in 1797, Norfolk County issued a certificate stating that William Bass 

was of Indian and English descent, and that his Indian line of ancestry ran directly back to the early 18th century elder in a traditionalist section of 

Nansemonds on the reservation; 

(15) in 1833, Virginia enacted a law enabling people of European and Indian 

descent to obtain a special certificate of ancestry; 

(16) the law originated from the county in which Nansemonds lived, and 

mostly Nansemonds, with a few people from other counties, took advantage of 

the new law; 

(17) a Methodist mission established around 1850 for Nansemonds is currently a standard Methodist congregation with Nansemond members; 

(18) in 1901, Smithsonian anthropologist James Mooney—

(A) visited the Nansemonds; and 

(B) completed a tribal census that counted 61 households and was later 

published; 

(19) in 1922, Nansemonds were given a special Indian school in the segregated school system of Norfolk County; 

(20) the school survived only a few years; 

(21) in 1928, University of Pennsylvania anthropologist Frank Speck published a book on modern Virginia Indians that included a section on the 

Nansemonds; and 

(22) the Nansemonds were organized formally, with elected officers, in 1984, 

and later applied for and received State recognition. 

SEC. 602. DEFINITIONS. 

In this title: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Interior. 

(2) TRIBAL MEMBER.—The term ‘‘tribal member’’ means—

(A) an individual who is an enrolled member of the Tribe as of the date 

of enactment of this Act; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
15 

(B) an individual who has been placed on the membership rolls of the 

Tribe in accordance with this title. 

(3) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Nansemond Indian Tribe. 

SEC. 603. FEDERAL RECOGNITION. 

(a) FEDERAL RECOGNITION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Federal recognition is extended to the Tribe. 

(2) APPLICABILITY OF LAWS.—All laws (including regulations) of the United 

States of general applicability to Indians or nations, Indian tribes, or bands of 

Indians (including the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.)) that are 

not inconsistent with this title shall be applicable to the Tribe and tribal members. 

(b) FEDERAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of enactment of this Act, the Tribe 

and tribal members shall be eligible for all services and benefits provided by 

the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian tribes without regard 

to— (A) the existence of a reservation for the Tribe; or 

(B) the location of the residence of any tribal member on or near any Indian reservation. 

(2) SERVICE AREA.—For the purpose of the delivery of Federal services to tribal members, the service area of the Tribe shall be considered to be the area 

comprised of the cities of Chesapeake, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach, Virginia. 

SEC. 604. MEMBERSHIP; GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. 

The membership roll and governing documents of the Tribe shall be the most recent membership roll and governing documents, respectively, submitted by the Tribe 

to the Secretary before the date of enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 605. GOVERNING BODY. 

The governing body of the Tribe shall be— (1) the governing body of the Tribe in place as of the date of enactment of 

this Act; or 

(2) any subsequent governing body elected in accordance with the election 

procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

SEC. 606. RESERVATION OF THE TRIBE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—If, not later than 25 years after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Tribe transfers any land within the boundaries of the city of Suffolk, the 

city of Chesapeake, or Isle of Wight County, Virginia, the Secretary shall take the 

land into trust for the benefit of the Tribe. Any land taken into trust for the benefit 

of the Tribe pursuant to this subsection shall be considered part of the reservation 

of the Tribe. 

(b) GAMING.—The Tribe may not conduct gaming activities as a matter of claimed 

inherent authority or under the authority of any Federal law, including the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) or under any regulations thereunder promulgated by the Secretary or the National Indian Gaming Commission. 

SEC. 607. HUNTING, FISHING, TRAPPING, GATHERING, AND WATER RIGHTS. 

Nothing in this title expands, reduces, or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, or water rights of the Tribe and members of the Tribe. 

PURPOSE OF THE LEGISLATION

The purpose of H.R. 1294, the Thomasina E. Jordan Indian 

Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition Act of 2007, is to extend 

Federal recognition to the Chickahominy Indian Tribe, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division, the Upper Mattaponi 

Tribe, the Rappahannock Tribe, Inc., the Monacan Indian Nation, 

and the Nansemond Indian Tribe. 

BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

The issue of the status of these six Virginia tribes comes to the 

Committee with a voluminous congressional record. The Committee 

held a hearing on this matter on April 18, 2007. Similar legislation 

was introduced either in the House of Representatives or the Senate in the 107th, 108th and 109th Congresses. Hearings have been 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
16 

held on the past legislation and reports have been filed. These 

hearings and reports have consistently established that these tribes 

are descendants of the historic tribes that occupied the area when 

the first English settlers arrived in what is now Virginia. The Department of the Interior has generally not voiced opposition to a 

Congressional recognition of these tribes other than to state that 

there is an administrative process available for them. The Department has not questioned the Tribe’s Indian ancestry or tribal governmental status. 

Document destruction and tampering 

Despite the wealth of documentation that exists for each of these 

tribes, it is not entirely clear that these tribes could meet the criteria used by the Bureau of Indian Affairs as part of the Federal 

Acknowledgment Process. Although references exist from the 1600s 

until the present indicating the existence of Indians in the Virginia 

area, much documentation that would be required by the Bureau 

of Indian Affairs has been tampered with or destroyed. 

During the Civil War period from 1861–1865, most of the local 

records were destroyed in fires at government buildings. In addition, many Indians began adopting Anglo-American names, language, and customs in order to hide their Indian heritage to ensure 

survival. Another hindrance to appearing in local records was the 

socio-economic status of most Virginia Indians. Until the late 19th 

century, they tended to rent land, engage in common-law marriages, and die without a will—activities that do not require official 

documents thus rendering them ‘‘invisible’’ in public records. 

In the first half of the twentieth century, there was a deliberate 

and systematic attempt to erase Indians in the Commonwealth of 

Virginia. Dr. Walter Ashby Plecker served as the first Registrar of 

the Virginia Bureau of Vital Statistics from 1912–1947. A white supremacist, Dr. Plecker set out to rid the Commonwealth of Virginia 

of any records that recorded the existence of Indians or Indian 

tribes living therein. He was instrumental in ensuring passage of 

the 1924 Racial Integrity Act which required all persons living in 

Virginia to provide extensive proof of their race. The Act made it 

a felony to submit records which misidentified a person’s race and 

prohibited documents and marriage licenses to anyone whose lineage was questioned. 

Dr. Plecker specifically targeted Virginia Indians. At the time, individuals who had 1/16 or less Indian blood were permitted to register as White. He believed that there were no true Indians living 

in Virginia and those claiming to be Indian were only using the 

title to try and pass as White. He wrote that mixed-blood families 

or those suspected of have Negro ancestry must not be allowed to 

register as White or Indian. It was illegal for individuals to classify 

themselves or their newborn children as ‘‘Indian.’’ Dr. Plecker sent 

a list of Indian surnames to County registrars insisting they not 

allow anyone with these surnames to register as White or Indian. 

He spent decades changing the race designation on birth certificates and other legal documents from Indian to Colored, Negro, or 

Free Issue (a term used to describe former slaves after the Civil 

War). He threatened hospitals, midwives, and registrars who used 

the classification Indian and was successful in getting many Virginia Indians jailed for refusing to acquiesce to his beliefs and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
17 

change their racial classification. Consequently, for 46 years, there 

was a systematic destruction of thousands of records that traced 

and recorded the ancestry of Virginia’s Indians. 

Schools 

The importance of tribal schools established by several of the 

tribes cannot be overlooked. During Reconstruction, the administration of public schools was left to each county and segregated 

schools were established in many areas of Virginia. ‘‘White’’ schools 

did not admit Indians but ‘‘Colored’’ schools did; any Indian children attending them, however, as well as their families, lost credibility to their claims as Indians. Counties were often reluctant to 

fund Indian schools if the Indian population was small, leaving it 

to the local Indian community to raise funds for their own schools, 

send their children to ‘colored’ schools, or not educate their children. 

Ancestry 

The evidence contained in numerous Congressional hearings and 

reports establishes that the Tribes are descended from the historic 

tribes that occupied the Virginia coastline in 1607. See H.R. 2345 

Thomasina E. Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition 

Act of 2001, Hearing held Sept. 25, 2002; S. 2694 Thomasina E. 

Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Act of 2002, Hearing held Oct. 9, 

2002, S. Rept. 107–921; S. 1423 Thomasina E. Jordan Indian 

Tribes of Virginia Act of 2003, S. Rept. 108–259; S. 480 Thomasina 

E. Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Act of 2005, S. Rept. 109–576. 

When English settlers came ashore along the Virginia coastline, 

they were received by approximately 30 Indian tribes. Six of those 

tribes—the Chickahominy Indian Tribe, the Chickahominy Indian 

Tribe—Eastern Division, the Upper Mattaponi Tribe, the Rappahannock Tribe, Inc., the Monacan Indian Nation, and the 

Nansemond Indian Tribe—are the subject of this bill. From 1607 

to 1646, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe lived approximately 20 

miles from Jamestown. The Mattaponi Indians, who later joined 

the Chickahominy Indians, lived farther away. In 1614, when the 

Chickahominy Indian Tribe entered into a treaty of mutual aid 

with the English they resided on the Chickahominy River. This 

was followed by another treaty entered into in 1646 that forced the 

Chickahominy from their homeland to the area around the York 

Mattaponi River in present-day King William County. The history 

of the Chickahominy and Mattaponi Indians was intertwined for 

many years thereafter. In 1677, the Chickahominy and Mattaponi 

Indians were subjects of the Queen of Pamunkey when the Chickahominy and Mattaponi Indians signed the Treaty of Middle Plantation with England which guaranteed the Indians civil rights, rights 

to gather food, and property rights. The Colony of Virginia assigned 

a reservation to the Chickahominy and Mattaponi Indians in 1695. 

In 1787, Thomas Jefferson noted the Chickahominy Indians were 

mixed with the Mattaponi Indians and nearby Pamunkey Indians. 

Chickahominy Indian Tribe 

Despite the treaties, in 1702 the Chickahominy were forced from 

their reservation, but in 1750 some members began to migrate 

from King William County back to the area around the ChickaVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:00 May 08, 2007 Jkt 059006 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR124.XXX HR124

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
18 

hominy River in New Kent and Charles City Counties where they 

still reside today. In 1831, the names of the ancestors of the modern-day Chickahominy Indian Tribe began to appear in the Charles 

City County census records. 

In 1901, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe formalized its governing 

structure and has held regularly scheduled meetings since. After 

the governing structure was formalized, the Tribe began operating 

the Samaria Indian School in 1901. A tribal tax assessment on 

Chickahominy men was used to build and maintain the Samaria 

Indian School, buy supplies, and pay a teacher’s salary. In 1922, 

the State agreed to pay 2⁄3 of the teachers’ salaries at Samaria Indian School. On various occasions in the 1930s and 1940s, the 

Chickahominy corresponded with John Collier, Commissioner of Indian Affairs, requesting assistance. Mr. Collier referred the matter 

to the Editor of the Richmond-News Leader newspaper of Richmond, Virginia, informing him that ‘‘as a matter largely of historical accident’’ he was unable to assist them. In the early 1980s, the 

State of Virginia established an advisory committee to examine Native issues. In 1983 the Commonwealth extended recognition to the 

Tribe. 

Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division 

The early history of the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division is the same as that of the Chickahominy Indian Tribe as the 

two tribes acted as one until the early 1900s. Two fires consumed 

all New Kent County records prior to 1870 but an enclave of Indians in New Kent County are shown in the Virginia Census of 1870. 

These are the ancestors of the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division. In 1901, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe (before the 

tribes were split) established the Samaria Indian Baptist Church 

in 1901. When the Chickahominy Indian Tribe was split into the 

Chickahominy Indian Tribe and the Chickahominy Indian Tribe— 

Eastern Division in 1910, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern 

Division started a one-room schoolhouse in New Kent County 

called the Boulevard Indian School. The Eastern Division tribal 

government was officially formed in 1920 and their church, the 

Tsena Commocko Baptist Church was organized in 1922. In 1925, 

the tribe was incorporated under a tax-exempt status. At this time, 

all tribal males 16 years of age and older began contributing dues 

towards the financial operation of the tribe. In 1950, the tribal 

school was closed and the children started attending Samaria Indian School, but the school was closed in 1967 when Virginia integrated its public school system. In the late 1970’s, the tribe was 

awarded a grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban 

Development to buy 2 mobile homes to be used as office and classroom space. Another grant from the Administration of Native 

American Programs was used for the purchase and improvement of 

office equipment and supplies. The Tribe received state recognition 

in 1983. 

Upper Mattaponi Tribe 

The Upper Mattaponi Tribe shares its earlier history with the 

Chickahominy Indian Tribe as they were forced together through 

treaties with the English. In 1695, the Chickahominy and 

Mattaponi Indians were assigned a reservation by the Virginia ColVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:38 May 08, 2007 Jkt 059006 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR124.XXX HR124

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
19 

ony but traded reservation land for land at a place known as ‘the 

cliffs’, which today is still known as the Mattaponi Indian Reservation. The Virginia Colony discontinued funding of interpreters for 

the Chickahominy and Mattaponi Indian Tribes in 1726, but James 

Adams, who served as an interpreter to the Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe, elected to stay with the Upper Mattaponi Indians. 

Today, a majority of the Upper Mattaponi Indians have ‘Adams’ as 

their surname. A Federal census in 1850 showed 10 Upper 

Mattaponi families living in King William County, Virginia. King 

William County records also indicate Upper Matttaponis residing 

in the County. From 1884 to present, King William County marriage records usually refer to Upper Mattaponis as ‘‘Indians.’’ Smithsonian anthropologist James Mooney indicated in 1901 

that he had heard about the Upper Mattaponi Indians but did not 

visit them. In 1928, University of Pennsylvania anthropologist 

Frank Speck published a book on modern Virginia Indians with a 

section on the Upper Mattaponis. The leadership of the Upper 

Mattaponi Indians opposed the use of a ‘colored’ designation in the 

1930 United States census and won a compromise in which the Indian ancestry of the Upper Mattaponis was recorded. Due to the 

activities of Dr. Plecker, however, the census also contained an asterisk indicating that Indians did not exist in Virginia. During the 

period of 1942 through 1945, the Upper Mattaponi Indians fought 

against the induction of young men of the Tribe into ‘colored’ units 

in the Armed Forces of the United States. Also during this time, 

a tribal roll for the Upper Mattaponi Indians was compiled. From 

1945 to 1946, negotiations occurred to admit some of the young 

people of the Upper Mattaponi to high schools for Federal Indians 

(especially at Cherokee) because no high school coursework was 

available for Indians in Virginia schools. In 1983, the Commonwealth extended formal recognition to the Upper Mattaponi Indians. 

Rappahannock Tribe, Inc. 

Written documentation of the Rappahannock Tribe first occurred 

when Captain John Smith was brought as a captive of King Powhatan to the Rappahannock King Accapataugh at his capital town, 

Tappahannock, on the Rappahannock River. Consistent with a series of peace treaties, around 1651 the Rappahannocks moved from 

the Rappahannock River to inland sites. In 1682, as tributaries of 

Pamunkey, the Rappahannocks became signators to the 1677 Treaty of Middle Plantation. By order of the Colonial Council in 1682, 

they were moved to Portobago Bay Indian Town, where they lived 

with the Portobago Tribe and Nansittico Tribe. The Colonial Council ordered them to move again in 1706; this time they moved back 

to their traditional winter hunting grounds on the ridge between 

the Rappahannock and Mattaponi Rivers, where they still reside. 

During the 1760s, three Rappahannock girls were raised on 

Thomas Nelson’s Bleak Hill Plantation in King William County. Of 

those girls, one married a Saunders man, one married a Johnson 

man, and one had 2 children, Edmund and Carter Nelson, fathered 

by Thomas Cary Nelson. It is these families to which the modern 

day Rappahannock trace their descent. A few tax records exist from 

1819 and 1820 indicating that Edward Bird, John Bird (and his 

wife), Carter Nelson, Edmund Nelson, and Carter Spurlock (all 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
20 

Rappahannock ancestors) were listed on the tax rolls of King and 

Queen County and taxed at the county poor rate. These tax records 

are significant documentation because the great majority of pre– 1864 records for King and Queen County were destroyed by fire. 

In 1870, St. Stephens Baptist Church was constructed for the 

Rappahannocks and was the primary church for the 

Rappahannocks until the Rappahannock Indian Baptist Church 

was established in 1964. 

During the early 1900s, James Mooney, noted anthropologist, 

maintained correspondence with the Rappahannocks, surveying 

them and instructing them on how to formalize their tribal government. In 1920, Dr. Speck visited the Rappahannocks and assisted 

them in organizing to fight for their sovereign rights. They were 

granted a charter from the Commonwealth of Virginia formalizing 

their tribal government in 1921. The Rappahannocks established a 

formal school at Lloyds, Essex County, Virginia in 1922. The 

Rappahannocks were engaged in an ongoing dispute with the Commonwealth of Virginia and the United States Census Bureau about 

their classification in the 1930 Federal census. The Virginia Vital 

Statistics Bureau classed all nonreservation Indians as ‘Negro’, and 

it failed to see why ‘an exception should be made’ for the 

Rappahannocks. During the Second World War, the Pamunkeys, 

Mattaponis, Chickahominies, and Rappahannocks had to fight the 

draft boards with respect to their racial identities. In the 1940 Census, 118 members of the Rappahannock Tribe were identified as 

‘‘Indian.’’ An article in the Smithsonian Institution Annual Report 

in 1948 entitled, ‘Surviving Indian Groups of the Eastern United 

States’ included and described the Rappahannock Tribe. In the late 

1940s and early 1950s, the Rappahannocks operated a school at Indian Neck. The State agreed to pay a tribal teacher to teach 10 students bused by King and Queen County to Sharon Indian School 

in King William County, Virginia. In 1972, the Rappahannocks 

worked with the Coalition of Eastern Native Americans to fight for 

Federal recognition. The Commonwealth extended recognition to 

the tribe in 1983. 

Monacan Indian Nation 

Documentation exists indicating the existence of the Monacans 

from 1608 when Europeans first made contact with them and that 

the Monacan Indian Nation are descendants of the Tribe that existed in the 1600’s and for time immemorial before that. One of the 

first written recordings of the Monacans was made by Captain 

John Smith when he noted the existence of Monacan towns on his 

map in 1608, describing the main town as Russawmeake. Captain 

Smith also described an expedition by a Mr. Newport to the Monacan area, which included two Monacan towns: Monhemencouch and 

Massinacack. Another map was published in 1651 still showing the 

existence of the Monacans but indicating that they had shifted territory somewhat. In 1677, the Monacans join other native groups 

in signing the Treaty of Middle Plantation. The Treaty of Albany 

was signed in 1722, which was intended to save the specified Virginia Indians, including the Monacan, from extinction by the Iroquois. In 1790, the First National Census recorded Benjamin Evans 

and Robert Johns, both ancestors of the present Monacan community as they had married Monacan women, as ‘‘white’’ with mulatto 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
21 

children. An 1850 Census recorded 29 families with Monacan surnames and an 1870 Census indicates Indians living in Amherst 

County, Virginia with the surname ‘‘Beverly,’’ a Monacan surname. 

Likewise, an 1880 Census records 6 individuals named Johns (also 

a Monacan surname) as Indian. A 1920 Census indicates 304 Indians living in Amherst County. 

In 1870, a log structure was built at the Bear Mountain Indian 

Mission. The structure became an Episcopal Mission and, as of the 

date of enactment of this Act, is listed as a landmark on the National Register of Historic Places. In 1920, 304 Amherst Indians 

were identified in the United States census. From 1930 through 

1931, numerous letters from Monacans to the Bureau of the Census were sent in response to the decision of Dr. Walter Plecker, 

former head of the Bureau of Vital Statistics of the State of Virginia, not to allow Indians to register as such for the 1930 census. 

The Monacans eventually succeeded in being allowed to claim their 

race, albeit with an asterisk attached to a note from Dr. Plecker 

stating that there were no Indians in Virginia. In 1947, D’Arcy 

McNickle, a Salish Indian, saw some of the children at the Amherst Mission and requested that the Cherokee Agency visit them 

because they appeared to be Indian. Chief Jarrett Blythe of the 

Eastern Band of Cherokee did visit the Mission and wrote that he 

‘would be willing to accept these children in the Cherokee school.’ In 1979, a Federal Coalition of Eastern Native Americans established the entity known as ‘Monacan Co-operative Pottery’ at the 

Amherst Mission. The Commonwealth extended recognition to the 

Monacan Tribe in 1989. 

Nansemond Indian Tribe 

Evidence documents that from 1607 until 1646, Nansemond Indians lived approximately 30 miles from Jamestown, Virginia and 

had significant contact with English settlers. In 1638, a Norfolk 

County Englishman married a Nansemond woman. That man and 

woman are the lineal ancestors of all members of the Nansemond 

Indian tribe and even of some the Nansemonds who lived further 

west. After 1646, the Nansemond Indians were split into two divisions: the Christianized ones that remained in Norfolk County, and 

the traditionalists that lived further west. In 1669, the two 

Nansemond divisions appeared in Virginia Colony’s census of Indian bowmen. Joining several other Indian tribes, the Nansemond 

Indians signed the Treaty of 1677 with the King of England. The 

Colony of Virginia prevented the Nansemonds and other Virginia 

Indians from negotiating separate peace treaties with the Iroquois. 

Instead, Virginia represented the Nansemonds and other tribes in 

the final Treaty of Albany in 1722. Norfolk County granted William 

Bass and his family the ‘‘Indian privileges’’ in 1727 of clearing 

swamp land and bearing arms because of his Nansemond ancestry. 

These privileges were forbidden to non-Indians. William Bass was 

issued a certificate of Nansemond descent in 1742. Norfolk County 

issued William Bass another certificate of Indian and English descent in 1797. 

In 1833, a state law was passed—at the behest of their local 

member of the Virginia House of Delegates—creating a special racial category in which they could be certified by the local county 

court. The category was officially called ‘‘Persons of Mixed Blood, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
22 

Not Being Free Negroes or Mulattos’’ and the county clerk responsible for completing and filing the required certificates simply classified the Nansemonds as ‘‘Indians.’’ A Methodist mission was established around the 1850s for the Nansemonds and is currently a 

standard Methodist congregation with Nansemond members. 

Smithsonian anthropologist James Mooney visited the Nansemonds 

in 1901 and completed a tribal census that counted 61 households. 

In 1922, the Nansemonds were given a special Indian school in the 

segregated school system of Norfolk County. In 1928, University of 

Pennsylvania anthropologist Frank Speck published a book on 

modern Virginia Indians that included a section on the 

Nansemonds. The Nansemonds were organized formally, with 

elected officers, in 1984, and received state recognition in 1985. 

Gaming 

The six Virginia tribes agreed to a prohibition on gaming and 

have repeatedly stated that they have no intention of pursuing 

gaming at this time. Accordingly, the tribes are prohibited from 

conducting any gaming pursuant to any inherent authority they 

may possess pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or any 

other Federal law. 

COMMITTEE ACTION

H.R. 1294 was introduced on March 1, 2007 by Representative 

James Moran (D–VA), along with 8 cosponsors. The bill was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources. On April 18, 2007, 

the Committee on Natural Resources held a hearing on H.R. 1294. 

The Committee received testimony from the Hon. James Moran 

(D–VA); the Hon. Robert Scott (D–VA); the Hon. Frank Wolf (R–

VA); the Hon. Carl Artman, Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, 

Bureau of Indian Affairs; Chief Stephen Adkins, Chickahominy Indian Tribe; Chief Kenneth Branham, Monacan Indian Nation; Reverend Jonathan Barton, Virginia Council of Churches, Inc.; and Ms. 

Helen Rountree, Anthropologist. 

On Wednesday, April 25, 2007, the Committee met to mark up 

H.R. 1294. The Committee favorably reported H.R. 1294, as 

amended, by voice vote. 

During the markup, four amendments were offered. The first 

amendment, an en bloc amendment, was offered by Mr. Rahall (D–

WV) and was agreed to by voice vote. The second amendment, offered by Mr. Flake (R–AZ), was withdrawn by unanimous consent. 

The third amendment, offered by Mr. Sali (R–ID), failed on a voice 

vote. The last amendment, offered by Mr. Duncan (R–TN), was 

agreed to by voice vote. It was noted by unanimous consent that 

Mr. Kildee (D–MI) passed on the voice vote to Mr. Duncan’s 

amendment. 

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1. Short title; Table of contents 

Section 1 as amended, establishes the short title as the 

‘‘Thomasina E. Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition Act of 2007.’’


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
23 

TITLE I—CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE 

Section 101. Findings 

Section 101 as amended, establishes a number of congressional 

findings documenting the history of the Chickahominy Indian 

Tribe. 

Section 102. Definitions 

Section 102 as amended, provides definitions for the terms ‘‘Secretary’’, ‘‘Tribal Member,’’ and ‘‘Tribe’’ for purposes of Title I. 

Section 103. Federal recognition 

Section 103 as amended, extends Federal recognition to the 

Chickahominy Indian Tribe and provides that all Federal laws and 

regulations of general applicability to other Indian tribes apply to 

the Chickahominy Indian Tribe and its members. It also provides 

that the Tribe and its members shall be eligible for all services and 

benefits provided by the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian tribes. Finally, it defines the Service Area of the tribe 

for the purpose of delivering Federal services to tribal members. 

Section 104. Membership; governing documents 

Section 104 as amended, establishes the membership roll and the 

governing documents of the Chickahominy Indian Tribe as the 

most recent roll and governing documents submitted to the Secretary of the Department of the Interior before the date of enactment of this Act. 

Section 105. Governing body 

Section 105 as amended, establishes the governing body of the 

Chickahominy Indian Tribe as the governing body in place as of 

the date of enactment of this Act or any subsequent governing body 

elected in accordance with election procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

Section 106. Reservation of the Tribe 

Section 106 as amended, establishes the reservation of the Tribe 

as those lands that are transferred to the Secretary of the Department of the Interior within 25 years after the date of enactment 

of this Act. Consistent with applicable law, the Secretary is required to place in trust any lands within the boundaries of specified counties on behalf of the Tribe. Further, the Tribe is prohibited 

from conducting gaming pursuant to any inherent authority, the 

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or any other Federal law. 

Section 107. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights 

Section 107 as amended, provides that nothing expands, reduces, 

or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, 

or water rights of the Tribe or its members. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
24 

TITLE II—CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE—EASTERN 

DIVISION 

Section 201. Findings 

Section 201 as amended, establishes a number of congressional 

findings documenting the history of the Chickahominy Indian 

Tribe—Eastern Division. 

Section 202. Definitions 

Section 202 as amended, provides definitions for the terms ‘‘Secretary’’, ‘‘Tribal Member,’’ and ‘‘Tribe’’ for purposes of Title II. 

Section 203. Federal recognition 

Section 203 as amended, extends Federal recognition to the 

Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division and provides that 

all Federal laws and regulations of general applicability to other 

Indian tribes apply to the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division and its members. It also provides that the Tribe and its 

members shall be eligible for all services and benefits provided by 

the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian tribes. Finally, it defines the Service Area of the tribe for the purpose of delivering Federal services to tribal members. 

Section 204. Membership; governing documents 

Section 204 as amended, establishes the membership roll and the 

governing documents of the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern 

Division as the most recent roll and governing documents submitted to the Secretary of the Department of the Interior before the 

date of enactment of this Act. 

Section 205. Governing body 

Section 205 as amended, establishes the governing body of the 

Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division as the governing 

body in place as of the date of enactment of this Act or any subsequent governing body elected in accordance with election procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

Section 206. Reservation of the Tribe 

Section 206 as amended, establishes the reservation of the Tribe 

as those lands that are transferred to the Secretary of the Department of the Interior within 25 years after the date of enactment 

of this Act. Consistent with applicable law, the Secretary is required to place any such lands within specified counties into trust 

on behalf of the Tribe. Further, the Tribe is prohibited from conducting gaming pursuant to any inherent authority, the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act, or any other Federal law. 

Section 207. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights 

Section 207 as amended, provides that nothing expands, reduces, 

or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, 

or water rights of the Tribe or its members. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
25 

TITLE III—UPPER MATTAPONI TRIBE 

Section 301. Findings 

Section 301 as amended, establishes a number of congressional 

findings documenting the history of the Upper Mattaponi Tribe. 

Section 302. Definitions 

Section 302 as amended, provides definitions for the terms ‘‘Secretary’’, ‘‘Tribal Member,’’ and ‘‘Tribe’’ of Title III. 

Section 303. Federal recognition 

Section 303 as amended, extends Federal recognition to the 

Upper Mattaponi Tribe and provides that all Federal laws and regulations of general applicability to other Indian tribes apply to the 

Upper Mattaponi Tribe and its members. It also provides that the 

Tribe and its members shall be eligible for all services and benefits 

provided by the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian 

tribes. Finally, it defines the Service Area of the tribe for the purpose of delivering Federal services to tribal members. 

Section 304. Membership; governing documents 

Section 304 as amended, establishes the membership roll and the 

governing documents of the Upper Mattaponi Tribe as the most recent roll and governing documents submitted to the Secretary of 

the Department of the Interior before the date of enactment of this 

Act. 

Section 305. Governing body 

Section 305 as amended, establishes the governing body of the 

Upper Mattaponi Tribe as the governing body in place as of the 

date of enactment of this Act or any subsequent governing body 

elected in accordance with election procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

Section 306. Reservation of the Tribe 

Section 306 as amended, establishes the reservation of the Tribe 

as those certain lands that are transferred to the Secretary of the 

Department of the Interior within 25 years after the date of enactment of this Act. Consistent with applicable law, the Secretary is 

required to place any lands within specified counties into trust on 

behalf of the Tribe. Further, the Tribe is prohibited from conducting gaming pursuant to any inherent authority, the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act, or any other Federal law. 

Section 307. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights 

Section 307 as amended, provides that nothing expands, reduces, 

or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, 

or water rights of the Tribe or its members. 

TITLE IV—RAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE, INC. 

Section 401. Findings 

Section 401 as amended, establishes a number of congressional 

findings documenting the history of the Rappahannock Tribe, Inc. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
26 

Section 402. Definitions 

Section 402 as amended, provides definitions for the terms ‘‘Secretary’’, ‘‘Tribal Member,’’ and ‘‘Tribe’’ for purposes of Title IV. 

Section 403. Federal recognition 

Section 403 as amended, extends Federal recognition to the Rappahannock Tribe, Inc. and provides that all Federal laws and regulations of general applicability to other Indian tribes apply to the 

Rappahannock Tribe, Inc. and its members. It also provides that 

the Tribe and its members shall be eligible for all services and benefits provided by the Federal Government to federally recognized 

Indian tribes. Finally, it defines the Service Area of the tribe for 

the purpose of delivering Federal services to tribal members. 

Section 404. Membership; governing documents 

Section 404 as amended, establishes the membership roll and the 

governing documents of the Rappahannock Tribe, Inc. as the most 

recent roll and governing documents submitted to the Secretary of 

the Department of the Interior before the date of enactment of this 

Act. 

Section 405. Governing body 

Section 405 as amended, establishes the governing body of the 

Rappahannock Tribe, Inc. as the governing body in place as of the 

date of enactment of this Act or any subsequent governing body 

elected in accordance with election procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

Section 406. Reservation of the Tribe 

Section 406 as amended, establishes the reservation of the Rappahannock Tribe, Inc. as those certain lands that are transferred 

to the Secretary of the Department of the Interior within 25 years 

after the date of enactment of this Act. Consistent with applicable 

law, the Secretary is required to place any such lands within specified counties into trust on behalf of the Tribe. Further, the Tribe 

is prohibited from conducting gaming pursuant to any inherent authority, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or any other Federal 

law. 

Section 407. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights 

Section 407 as amended, provides that nothing expands, reduces, 

or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, 

or water rights of the Tribe or its members. 

TITLE V—MONACAN INDIAN NATION 

Section 501. Findings 

Section 501 as amended, establishes a number of congressional 

findings documenting the history of the Monacan Indian Nation. 

Section 502. Definitions 

Section 502 as amended, provides definitions for the terms ‘‘Secretary’’, ‘‘Tribal Member,’’ and ‘‘Tribe’’ for purposes of Title V. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
27 

Section 503. Federal recognition 

Section 503 as amended, extends Federal recognition to the Monacan Indian Nation and provides that all Federal laws and regulations of general applicability to other Indian tribes apply to the 

Monacan Indian Nation and its members. It also provides that the 

Tribe and its members shall be eligible for all services and benefits 

provided by the Federal Government to federally recognized Indian 

tribes. Finally, it defines the Service Area of the tribe for the purpose of delivering Federal services to tribal members. 

Section 504. Membership; governing documents 

Section 504 as amended, establishes the membership roll and the 

governing documents of the Monacan Indian Nation as the most recent roll and governing documents submitted to the Secretary of 

the Department of the Interior before the date of enactment of this 

Act. 

Section 505. Governing body 

Section 505 as amended, establishes the governing body of the 

Monacan Indian Nation as the governing body in place as of the 

date of enactment of this Act or any subsequent governing body 

elected in accordance with election procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

Section 506. Reservation of the Tribe 

Section 506 as amended, establishes the reservation of the Monacan Indian Nation as those certain lands that are transferred to 

the Secretary of the Department of the Interior within 25 years 

after the date of enactment of this Act. Consistent with applicable 

law, the Secretary is required to place any such lands within specified counties into trust on behalf of the Tribe. Further, the Tribe 

is prohibited from conducting gaming pursuant to any inherent authority, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or any other Federal 

law. 

Section 507. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights 

Section 507 as amended, provides that nothing expands, reduces, 

or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, 

or water rights of the Tribe or its members. 

TITLE VI—NANSEMOND INDIAN TRIBE 

Section 601. Findings 

Section 601 as amended, establishes a number of congressional 

findings documenting the history of the Nansemond Indian Tribe. 

Section 602. Definitions 

Section 602 as amended, provides definitions for the terms ‘‘Secretary,’’ ‘‘Tribal Member,’’ and ‘‘Tribe’’ for purposes of Title VI. 

Section 603. Federal recognition 

Section 603 as amended, extends Federal recognition to the 

Nansemond Indian Tribe and provides that all Federal laws and 

regulations of general applicability to other Indian tribes apply to 

the Nansemond Indian Tribe and its members. It also provides that 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
28 

the Tribe and its members shall be eligible for all services and benefits provided by the Federal Government to federally recognized 

Indian tribes. Finally, it defines the Service Area of the tribe for 

the purpose of delivering Federal services to tribal members. 

Section 604. Membership; governing documents 

Section 604 as amended, establishes the membership roll and the 

governing documents of the Nansemond Indian Tribe as the most 

recent roll and governing documents submitted to the Secretary of 

the Department of the Interior before the date of enactment of this 

Act. 

Section 605. Governing body 

Section 605 as amended, establishes the governing body of the 

Nansemond Indian Tribe as the governing body in place as of the 

date of enactment of this Act or any subsequent governing body 

elected in accordance with election procedures specified in the governing documents of the Tribe. 

Section 606. Reservation of the Tribe 

Section 606 as amended, establishes the reservation of the 

Nansemond Indian Tribe as those certain lands that are transferred to the Secretary of the Department of the Interior within 25 

years after the date of enactment of this Act. Consistent with applicable law, the Secretary is required to place any such lands within 

specified cities and counties into trust on behalf of the Tribe. Further, the Tribe is prohibited from conducting gaming pursuant to 

any inherent authority, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or any 

other Federal law. 

Section 607. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights 

Section 607 as amended, provides that nothing expands, reduces, 

or affects in any manner any hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, 

or water rights of the Tribe or its members. 

COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Regarding clause 2(b)(1) of rule X and clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII 

of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee on 

Natural Resources’ oversight findings and recommendations are reflected in the body of this report. 

CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

Article 1, section 3 of the Constitution of the United States 

grants Congress the authority to enact this bill. 

COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XIII

1. Cost of Legislation. Clause 3(d)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of 

the House of Representatives requires an estimate and a comparison by the Committee of the costs which would be incurred in carrying out this bill. However, clause 3(d)(3)(B) of that Rule provides 

that this requirement does not apply when the Committee has included in its report a timely submitted cost estimate of the bill prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
29 

2. Congressional Budget Act. As required by clause 3(c)(2) of rule 

XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 

308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, this bill does not 

contain any new budget authority, spending authority, credit authority, or an increase or decrease in revenues or tax expenditures. 

3. General Performance Goals and Objectives. This bill does not 

authorize funding and therefore, clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the 

Rules of the House of Representatives does not apply. 

4. Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate. Under clause 

3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and 

section 403 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has received the following cost estimate for this bill from the 

Director of the Congressional Budget Office: 

H.R. 1294—Thomasina E. Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition Act of 2007 

Summary: H.R. 1294 would provide Federal recognition to six Indian tribes in the State of Virginia—the Chickahominy Indian 

Tribe, the Eastern Division of the Chickahominy Indian Tribe, the 

Upper Mattaponi Tribe, the Rappahannock Tribe, Inc., the Monacan Indian Nation, and the Nansemond Indian Tribe. CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 1294 would cost $40 million over the 

2008–2012 period, assuming the appropriation of the necessary 

funds. Enacting H.R. 1294 would have no effect on direct spending 

or revenues. 

H.R. 1294 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) 

and would impose no direct costs on State, local, or tribal governments. 

Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 1294 is shown in the following table. The costs 

of this legislation fall within budget functions 450 (community and 

regional development) and 550 (health). 

Basis of estimate: H.R. 1294 would provide Federal recognition 

to six Indian tribes in the state of Virginia. Although the bill does 

not specifically authorize the appropriation of funds, such recognition would allow the tribes to receive funding from various programs administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the 

Indian Health Service (IHS). 

By fiscal year, in millions of dollars— 

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 

CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

Estimated Authorization Level ....................................................................... 2 2 2 2 2 

Estimated Outlays .......................................................................................... 2 2 2 2 2 

Indian Health Service 

Estimated Authorization Level ....................................................................... 6 6 6 6 7 

Estimated Outlays .......................................................................................... 5 6 6 6 7 

Total Changes 

Estimated Authorization Level .............................................................. 8 8 8 8 9 

Estimated Outlays ................................................................................. 7 8 8 8 9 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

BIA provides funding to federally recognized Indian tribes for 

various purposes, including child welfare services, adult care, comVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:00 May 08, 2007 Jkt 059006 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR124.XXX HR124

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
30 

munity development, and general assistance. Based on information 

from the tribes and the State, CBO estimates that there are approximately 3,175 members of the affected tribes. Assuming the appropriation of the necessary funds, CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 1294 would cost BIA $10 million over the 2008–2012 

period. This estimate is based on BIA expenditures for other federally recognized tribes located in the eastern United States; the affected tribes may qualify for more or fewer BIA services than other 

tribes in the region, thus, BIA’s cost to implement this bill may be 

more or less than $10 million over the next 5 years. 

Indian Health Service 

H.R. 1294 also would make members of the tribes affected by the 

bill eligible to receive health benefits from IHS. Based on information from IHS, CBO estimates that about 55 percent of tribal members—or about 1,800 people—would receive benefits each year. 

CBO estimates that the cost to serve those individuals would be 

similar to funding for current beneficiaries—about $3,200 per individual in 2008. Assuming appropriation of the necessary funds, 

CBO estimates that IHS benefits for the tribes affected by the bill 

would cost $5 million in 2008 and $30 million over the 2008–2012 

period. 

Other Federal Agencies 

In addition to BIA and IHS, certain Indian tribes also receive 

funding from other Federal programs within the Departments of 

Education, Housing and Urban Development, Labor, and Agriculture. Based on their status as State-recognized tribes, the six 

tribes affected by the bill are currently eligible to receive funding 

from those sources. Thus, CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 

1294 would not add to the cost of those programs. 

Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: H.R. 1294 contains 

no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in 

UMRA and would impose no direct costs on State, local, or tribal 

governments. 

Estimate prepared by: Federal Costs: Daniel Hoople—Bureau of 

Indian Affairs; Eric Rollins—Indian Health Service. Impact on 

State, local, and tribal governments: Marjorie Miller. Impact on the 

private sector: Amy Petz. 

Estimate approved by: Peter H. Fontaine, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis. 

COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC LAW 104–4

This bill contains no unfunded mandates. 

EARMARK STATEMENT

H.R. 1294 does not contain any congressional earmarks, limited 

tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in clause 9(d), 9(e) 

or (f) of rule XXI. 

PREEMPTION OF STATE, LOCAL OR TRIBAL LAW

This bill is not intended to preempt any State, local, or tribal 

law. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
31 

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW

If enacted, this bill would make no changes in existing law. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS