alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 203.15 Trust benefits under sections 206, 207, and 318 of the Packers and Stockyards Act. ( a ) Within the times specified under sections 206(b), 207(d), and 318(b) of the Act, any livestock seller, live poultry seller or grower, to preserve their interest in the statutory trust, must give written notice to the appropriate packer, live poultry dealer, or livestock dealer and file such notice with the Secretary within the prescribed time by letter, fax, email, or other electronic transmission. The written notice should provide: ( 1 ) Notification to preserve trust benefits;
( 2 ) Identification of packer, live poultry dealer, or livestock dealer;
( 3 ) Identification of seller or poultry grower;
( 4 ) Date of the transaction;
( 5 ) Date of seller's or poultry grower's receipt of notice that payment instrument has been dishonored (if applicable); and
( 6 ) Amount of money due; and to make certain that a copy of such letter, fax, email, or other electronic transmission is filed with a PSD regional office or with the PSD headquarters office within the prescribed time.
( b ) While the information in paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this section is desirable, any written notice which informs the packer, live poultry dealer, or livestock dealer, and the Secretary that the packer, live poultry dealer, or livestock dealer has failed to pay is sufficient to meet the statutory requirement in paragraph (a) of this section if it is given within the prescribed time.
( c ) For purposes of administering statutory trusts under the Act, a *cash sale* means a sale in which the seller does not expressly extend credit to the buyer.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0581-0308) [88 FR 41022, June 23, 2023]
# C_2012343EN.01001403.xml

| 10.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2012 — LIS v Commission

(Case T-269/10) (1)

1

(Dumping - Importation of compact fluorescent lamps with integrated electronic ballast originating in China - Request for reimbursement of duties collected - Article 11(8) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 11(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009) - Conditions - Evidence)

2012/C 343/22

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LIS GmbH Licht Impex Service (Mettmann, Germany) (represented by: K.-P. Langenkamp, G. Hebrant and G. Holler, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and T. Maxian Rusche, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 2198 final of 12 April 2010 concerning requests for reimbursement of anti-dumping duties paid in respect of the importation of compact fluorescent lamps with integrated electronic ballast originating in the People’s Republic of China.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders LIS GmbH Licht Impex Service to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LIS GmbH Licht Impex Service to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1






            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Foamex International Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos.  33-74264,  33-94154,  and 333-90020) on Form S-8 of Foamex  International
Inc.  of our report  dated  March 31,  2006,  with  respect to the  consolidated
balance sheets of Foamex  International  Inc. and  subsidiaries as of January 1,
2006 and January 2, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
cash flows,  and  stockholders'  deficiency for the fiscal years then ended, and
the related financial  statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15, which
report  appears  in the  January  1, 2006  annual  report on Form 10-K of Foamex
International Inc.


Our report dated March 31, 2006 contains an explanatory paragraph that refers to
Note  1 to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  which  indicates  that  on
September  19,  2005  Foamex  International  Inc.  and  certain of its  domestic
subsidiaries  filed a  voluntary  petition  for relief  under  Chapter 11 of the
United States  Bankruptcy  Code,  the effects of which raise  substantial  doubt
about its ability to continue as a going  concern.  The  consolidated  financial
statements and financial statement schedules do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

Our report also refers to a change in  accounting  principle for the adoption of
Financial  Accounting  Standards Board  Interpretation  No. 47,  "Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations".



/s/  KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 2006
#### §§ 317.364-317.368 [Reserved]
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Grants to Help Repair Affordable Rental Housing in 

Rural Communities 

WASHINGTON, May 26, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is seeking applications for grants to help owners of 

rental housing repair and rehabilitate their units, if they make them available for low- and very-low-income 

rural residents. USDA is providing the funding through the Housing Preservation Grant program.

Eligible applicants include town or county governments, public agencies, federally recognized Indian tribes, and 

nonprofit and faith-based organizations. 

USDA encourages applicants to consider projects that will advance the following key priorities: 

• Assisting rural communities recover economically from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, 

particularly disadvantaged communities; 

• Ensuring all rural residents have equitable access to USDA Rural Development (RD) programs and 

benefits from RD-funded projects; and, 

• Reducing climate pollution and increasing resilience to the impacts of climate change through economic 

support to rural communities.

USDA does not provide funding directly to individual homeowners under this program.

Paper pre-applications are due by 4:30 p.m. local time on July 11, 2022, at the Rural Development state office 

where the project will be located. Electronic pre-applications are due by 4:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, July 

11, 2022. For a list of offices, visit the state office website.

See page 31976 of the May 26, 2022, Federal Register for additional information.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
#### § 381.161 “(Kind) A La Kiev.”

Such product consists of poultry meat of the kind indicated, stuffed with butter which may be seasoned and the product may be wrapped in sufficient skin to cover the meat. It may be dipped in batter, fried, and frozen.
#### § 381.46 Severability.

Should a court of competent jurisdiction hold any provision of this part 381, subpart H to be invalid, such action shall not affect any other provision of this part 381.
# C_2012373EN.01000502.xml

| 1.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/5

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Court of Justice

(Case T-447/10) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of services for the maintenance, development and support of computer applications - Rejection of the applicant’s tenders and award of the contracts to another tenderer - Selection criteria - Award criteria - Obligation to state reasons - Non-contractual liability)

2012/C 373/08

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: T. Lefèvre, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice of 12 July 2010 by which it rejected the applicant’s tenders for lots 1 and 2 in invitation to tender CJ 7/09 of 11 November 2009 for the maintenance, development and support of computer applications (OJ 2009, S 217-312293) and of all further related decisions of the Court of Justice, including the decision to award the respective contracts to the successful contractors, and second, for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 12 July 2010 rejecting the tenders submitted by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE in tender procedure CJ 7/09 of 11 November 2009 for the maintenance, development and support of computer applications and awarding the contracts to other tenderers; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 12 July 2010 rejecting the tenders submitted by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE in tender procedure CJ 7/09 of 11 November 2009 for the maintenance, development and support of computer applications and awarding the contracts to other tenderers;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Court of Justice to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Court of Justice to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.

1

---
# C_2010301EN.01006303.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/63

---

Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Kimman v Commission

(Case F-74/10)

()

2010/C 301/102

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eugène Emile Kimman (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for 2008.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant’s appraisal report for 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant’s appraisal report for 2008;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 
-  Rulemaking 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# Committee Member Biographies

Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee Member Bios May 2022.pdf (190.03 KB)

Committee Member Biographies

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
<PAGE>   1





                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE DATA


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                ----------------------------------------------
                                                   1997                1996             1995
                                                -----------        -----------      ----------
<S>                                             <C>                <C>                <C>
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations *    $(7,918,362)       $(6,861,406)     $  594,176

Loss from discontinued operations *                 476,967         (1,361,954)       (524,914)
                                                -----------        -----------      ----------
Net earnings (loss)                             $(7,441,395)       $(8,223,360)     $   69,262
                                                ===========        ============     ==========

Weighted average number of common shares          4,000,210          3,710,484       3,669,577

Net effect of dilutive stock options
  based on the treasury stock method (using 
  the initial public offering price of      
  $12.50 per share and assuming that all    
  options had been outstanding for all      
  periods prior to the IPO on November 17,  
  1993) (1)                                               -                  -         297,054
                                                -----------        -----------      ----------

Shares used for computation                       4,000,210          3,710,484       3,966,631
                                                ===========        ===========      ==========
Per Share Data:                                                                     
  Earnings (loss) from continuing operations *    $   (1.98)       $     (1.85)     $      .15
                                                ===========        ===========      ==========

  Net earnings (loss)                             $   (1.86)       $     (2.22)     $      .02
                                                ===========        ===========      ==========
</TABLE>                                        

Note - fully diluted and primary calculations are the same.

(1)  Dilutive stock options for the fiscal years ended March 31, 1997 and
     March 31, 1996, were not included because of the net loss.


* Indicates Restated Amounts.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas E. Chorman,  pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Foamex  International Inc.
for the period ended December 29, 2002 (the "Report");

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; and

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this Report.


Date: March 27, 2003                    /s/ Thomas E. Chorman
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Thomas E. Chorman
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Foamex   International   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Foamex
International  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-1998
<CASH>                                         143,374
<SECURITIES>                                   282,747
<RECEIVABLES>                                  484,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,913)
<INVENTORY>                                    582,728
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,575,922
<PP&E>                                         756,165
<DEPRECIATION>                               (368,141)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,016,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          597,118
<BONDS>                                        386,343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,030,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,016,655
<SALES>                                      2,323,651
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,323,651
<CGS>                                        2,073,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,073,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               109,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    51
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                140,950
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,219
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
        

</TABLE>
§ 322.2 Export certification. ( a ) Exporters must apply for export certification of inspected and passed products shipped to any foreign country. Exporters may apply for an export certificate using a paper or electronic application. FSIS will assess exporters that submit an electronic application the charge in § 350.7(e) of this chapter.
( b ) FSIS will issue only one certificate for each consignment, except in the case of error in the certificate or loss of the certificate originally issued. A request for a replacement certificate, except in the case of a lost certificate, must be accompanied by the original certificate. The new certificate will carry the following statement: “Issued in replacement of ______”, with the numbers of the certificates that have been superseded.
( c ) FSIS will deliver a copy of the certificate to the exporter. The exporter may furnish the copy of the certificate to the consignee for purposes of affecting the entry of product into the foreign country of destination.
( d ) FSIS will retain a copy of the certificate.
( e ) Exporters may request inspection personnel to issue certificates for export consignments of product of official establishments not under their supervision, provided the consignments are first identified as having been “U.S. inspected and passed,” are found to be neither adulterated nor misbranded, and are marked as required by § 322.1.
[81 FR 42234, June 29, 2016]
§ 27.240 Review and approval of security vulnerability assessments. ( a ) *Review and approval.* The Department will review and approve in writing all Security Vulnerability Assessments that satisfy the requirements of § 27.215, including ASPs submitted pursuant to § 27.235.
( b ) If a Security Vulnerability Assessment does not satisfy the requirements of § 27.215, the Department will provide the facility with a written notification that includes a clear explanation of deficiencies in the Security Vulnerability Assessment. The facility shall then enter further consultations with the Department and resubmit a sufficient Security Vulnerability Assessment by the time specified in the written notification provided by the Department under this section. If the resubmitted Security Vulnerability Assessment does not satisfy the requirements of § 27.215, the Department will provide the facility with written notification (including a clear explanation of deficiencies in the Security Vulnerability Assessment) of the Department's disapproval of the Security Vulnerability Assessment.
[72 FR 17729, Apr. 9, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 41892, Aug. 4, 2021]
# C_2011331EN.01001903.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Nike International v OHIM — Deichmann (VICTORY RED)

(Case T-356/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the Community word mark VICTORY RED - Earlier international and national word marks Victory - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 331/36

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nike International Ltd (Beaverton, Oregon, United States) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Deichmann SE (Essen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 May 2010 (Case R 1309/2009-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Deichmann SE and Nike International Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nike International Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nike International Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Clarus Corporation:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-42602) on Form S-8 of Clarus Corporation of our report dated April 23, 2004,
relating to the statements of financial condition of the Clarus Corporation
Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
statements of operations and changes in Plan equity for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December
31, 2003, annual report on Form 11-K of Clarus Corporation included as Exhibit
99.1 to amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Clarus
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                               /s/ KPMG LLP

         Atlanta, Georgia
         April 23, 2004