alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2377

EMILE BRILLANT EKAMBY,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-885-395)

Submitted: July 20, 2005 Decided: August 11, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,

Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Karen A.

Smith, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Emile Brillant Ekamby, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s denial of

his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture.

In his petition for review, Ekamby challenges the

immigration judge’s determination that he failed to establish his

eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination

denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the

evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable

factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.”

INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have

reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Ekamby fails to

show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we

cannot grant the relief that he seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of

Ekamby’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden

of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even

though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who

is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding

of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft, 378

F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Ekamby fails to show that
- 3 -

he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal. 

We also find that substantial evidence supports the

immigration judge’s finding that Ekamby fails to meet the standard

for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such

relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than

not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed

country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2005). We find

that Ekamby failed to make the requisite showing before the

immigration court.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### §3704. Foreclosure commissioner; designation, duties, etc.

A foreclosure commissioner or commissioners designated pursuant to this chapter shall have a nonjudicial power of sale as provided in this chapter. Where the Secretary is the holder of a multifamily mortgage, the Secretary may designate a foreclosure commissioner and, with or without cause, may designate a substitute foreclosure commissioner to replace a previously designated foreclosure commissioner, by executing a duly acknowledged, written designation stating the name and business or residential address of the commissioner or substitute commissioner. The designation shall be effective upon execution. Except as provided in section 3707(b) of this title, a copy of the designation shall be mailed with each copy of the notice of default and foreclosure sale served by mail in accordance with section 3708(1) of this title. The foreclosure commissioner, if a natural person, shall be a resident of the State in which the security property is located and, if not a natural person, the foreclosure commissioner must be duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State in which the security property is located. The foreclosure commissioner shall be a person who is responsible, financially sound and competent to conduct the foreclosure. More than one foreclosure commissioner may be designated. If a natural person is designated as foreclosure commissioner or substitute foreclosure commissioner, such person shall be designated by name, except that where such person is designated in his or her capacity as an official or employee of the government of the State or subdivision thereof in which the security property is located, such person may be designated by his or her unique title or position instead of by name. The Secretary shall be a guarantor of payment of any judgment against the foreclosure commissioner for damages based upon the commissioner's failure properly to perform the commissioner's duties. As between the Secretary and the mortgagor, the Secretary shall bear the risk of any financial default by the foreclosure commissioner. In the event that the Secretary makes any payment pursuant to the preceding two sentences, the Secretary shall be fully subrogated to the rights satisfied by such payment.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title III, §365, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 423.)
#### § 381.88 Parasites.

Organs or other parts of carcasses which are found to be infested with parasites, or which show lesions of such infestation shall be condemned and, if the whole carcass is affected, the whole carcass shall be condemned.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 6, 1998, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE 40 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 6, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   10-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-6-1998
<CASH>                                           6,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,020
<PP&E>                                         104,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,051
<BONDS>                                        185,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,619 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                   (102,908)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,433
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,867
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       510
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,180)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,416)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,596)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1038 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1038

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt small issue bonds 
               for agriculture from the State volume cap.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1999

  Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Kerrey, Mr. Conrad, and Mr. Daschle) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt small issue bonds 
               for agriculture from the State volume cap.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Bond Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF AGRICULTURAL BONDS FROM STATE VOLUME CAP.

    (a) In General.--Section 146(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to exception for certain bonds) is amended by striking 
``and'' at the end of paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end 
of paragraph (4) and inserting ``, and'', and by inserting after 
paragraph (4) the following:
            ``(5) any qualified small issue bond described in section 
        144(a)(12)(B)(ii).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to bonds issued after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 319.307 Spaghetti sauce with meat.

“Spaghetti Sauce with Meat” shall contain not less than 6 percent of meat computed on the weight of the fresh meat. Mechanically Separated (Species) may be used in accordance with § 319.6.

[35 FR 15597, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 43 FR 26425, June 20, 1978; 47 FR 28257, June 29, 1982]
-  Home 
-  Training 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Outreach & Engagement 
                      -  Training Requirements for Industry 
                      -  Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG) 
                      -  Workshops 
                      -  Webinars 
                      -  Community Liaisons (CLs) 
                      -  Publications 
                      -  Publicaciones (en español) 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  Training Modules 
                      -  Videos and Mobile Apps 
                      -  Contact Us 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Hazardous Materials Training Modules                   

## Contact Us

Hazardous Materials Training Program
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**Training@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4900****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922****Fax:**202-366-7342**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Training Modules

## 

## Hazardous Materials Transportation Training Modules

The Hazardous Materials Transportation Training Modules introduce users to the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; Title 49 CFR Parts 171-180). All hazmat employees (as defined in § 171.8 of the HMR) must receive training that includes general awareness/familiarization training, function-specific training, safety training, and security awareness training. See Subpart H of Part 172 of the HMR for all training requirements.

The Office of Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS) has developed this free online training module program to meet the requirements for general awareness/familiarization training and to serve as the basis for function-specific training. The "8.0 Security Requirements" training module meets the requirement for security awareness training.

All topic areas covered in the modules include:
                      - Hazardous Materials Table (HMT)
                      - Shipping Papers
                      - Marking and Labeling
                      - Placarding
                      - Packaging
                      - Modal Requirements for Highway, Air, Rail and Water
                      - Security Requirements

The Hazardous Materials Transportation Training Modules also include interactive training functionality for enhanced instruction. The training modules are available at:

http://dothazmat.vividlms.com

Comments on the current release of the Hazmat Transportation Training Modules may be sent to training@dot.gov.

**Note:** These modules are for instructional purposes only and are not a substitute for the HMR. Although the modules will be updated periodically, the HMR requirements may change more frequently. To ensure that you are following the current regulations, consult a current copy of the HMR and any subsequent final rules published to the Federal Register.
# C_2011046EN.01000302.xml

| 12.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/3

---

Appeal brought on 24 November 2010 by the Kingdom of the Netherlands against the judgment delivered by the General Court( Seventh Chamber) on 9 September 2010 in Case T-348/07 Stichting Al-Aqsa v Council of the European Union

Stichting Al-Aqsa

Council of the European Union

(Case C-550/10 P)

2011/C 46/05

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C.M. Wissels and M. Noort, Agents)

Appellant

Other parties to the proceedings: Stichting Al-Aqsa, Council of the European Union, European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal in Case T-348/07 and refer the case back to the General Court; and |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal in Case T-348/07 and refer the case back to the General Court; and

| — | order the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The General Court misinterpreted Article 1(4) and (6) of Common Position 2001/931 and Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 (1) in finding that the order of the court hearing the application for interim measures could no longer, following the repeal of the Sanctieregeling terrorisme 2003 (2003 Netherlands regulation on sanctions for the suppression of terrorism), serve as a basis for placing Al-Aqsa on the EU asset-freezing list.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 70).

1

---
§ 145.13 Debarment from participation. Participants in the Plan, who after investigation by the Official State Agency or its representative, are notified in writing of their apparent noncompliance with the Plan provisions or regulations of the Official State Agency, shall be afforded a reasonable time, as specified by the Official State Agency, within which to demonstrate or achieve compliance. If compliance is not demonstrated or achieved within the specified time, the Official State Agency may debar the participant from further participation in the Plan for such period, or indefinitely, as the Agency may deem appropriate. The debarred participant shall be afforded notice of the bases for the debarment and opportunity to present his views with respect to the debarment in accordance with procedures adopted by the Official State Agency. The Official State Agency shall thereupon decide whether the debarment order shall continue in effect. Such decision shall be final unless the debarred participant, within 30 days after the issuance of the debarment order, requests the Administrator to determine the eligibility of the debarred participant for participation in the Plan. In such event the Administrator shall determine the matter de novo in accordance with the rules of practice in 7 CFR part 50, which are hereby made applicable to proceedings before the Administrator under this section. The definitions in 7 CFR 50.10 and the following definitions shall apply with respect to terms used in such rules of practice: ( a ) *Administrator* means the Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or any officer or employee to whom authority has heretofore been delegated or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated to act in his stead.
[36 FR 23112, Dec. 3, 1971, as amended at 38 FR 3038, Feb. 1, 1973. Redesignated at 44 FR 61586, Oct. 26, 1979, and amended at 47 FR 21991, May 20, 1982; 67 FR 8468, Feb. 25, 2002]
### §543. Interference with aids to navigation; penalty

It shall be unlawful for any person, or public body, or instrumentality, excluding the armed forces, to remove, change the location of, obstruct, wilfully damage, make fast to, or interfere with any aid to navigation established, installed, operated, or maintained by the Coast Guard pursuant to section 541 of this title, or with any aid to navigation lawfully maintained under authority granted by the Coast Guard pursuant to section 542 of this title, or to anchor any vessel in any of the navigable waters of the United States so as to obstruct or interfere with range lights maintained therein. Whoever violates the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not more than $1,500 for each offense. Each day during which such violation shall continue shall be considered as a new offense.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 500, §84; Pub. L. 113–281, title II, §205(a)(2), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3025; renumbered §543 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§105(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4200, 4240.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 33, U.S.C., 1946, ed., §§761, 762 (May 14, 1908, ch. 168, §6, 35 Stat. 162; June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §6, 36 Stat. 538; Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 81, §8, 38 Stat. 928; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §2(a), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1432).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 543 was renumbered section 2905 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 541" for "section 81" and "section 542" for "section 83".

Pub. L. 115–282, §105(b), renumbered section 84 of this title as this section.

2014—Pub. L. 113–281 substituted "$1,500" for "$500".
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Madera County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting in North Fork, California on March 9th and March 16th, 2011. The purpose of these meetings will be to discuss and approve submitted proposals for funding as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110-343) for expenditure of Payments to States Madera County Title II funds.

# DATES:

The meetings will be held on March 9th, and March 16th, 2011 from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. in North Fork, CA.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meetings will be held at the Bass Lake Ranger District, 57003 Road 225, North Fork, California, 93643. Send written comments to Julie Roberts, Madera County Resource Advisory Committee Coordinator, c/o Sierra National Forest, Bass Lake Ranger District, at the above address, or electronically to                         *jaroberts@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Julie Roberts, Madera County Resource Advisory Committee Coordinator, (559) 877-2218 ext. 3159.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meetings are open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring Payments to States Madera County Title II project matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meetings.

Dated: January 24, 2011.

Dave Martin,

District Ranger.

[FR Doc. 2011-5084 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
#### The People *ex rel.*Donald Ballard, Petitioner-Appellant, *v.*Peter B. Bensinger *et al.,*Respondents-Appellees.

(No. 73-449;

Second District (2nd Division)

January 2, 1975

Ralph Ruebner, of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Elgin, for appellant.

William Sisler, State’s Attorney, of Freeport, for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE RECHENMACHER.
// jQuery(document).ready(function ($) {
// //     // "use strict";
 
  
	
// if (jQuery("div").hasClass("home-page-menu"))  {
      
//   var num = jQuery(".home-page-menu").offset().top; 
    
//     jQuery(window).bind('scroll', function () {
//         if (jQuery(window).scrollTop() > num) {
//             jQuery('.home-page-menu').removeClass('topact'); 
//         } else {
//             jQuery('.home-page-menu').addClass('topact'); 
//         }  
//     });
// } 

// });
// console.log("demo");  


window.addEventListener("load", (event) => {
    jQuery(document).ready(function ($) {
        $( ".colapsible-row" ).accordion({
            heightStyle: "fixed",
            active: 'false',
            collapsible: true,
            event: "click"
          });

         let input = $('input[name="keys"]');
         console.log(input);
         let placeholder  = input.attr('placeholder');
         console.log(placeholder);
          input.focus(function() {
          $(this).attr('placeholder', '');
          })

          input.blur(function() {
            if ($(this).val() === '') {
                $(this).attr('placeholder', placeholder);
            }
        });
    });
  });