alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Matthew Hale, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of S1 Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2004                                 /s/ Matthew Hale   Matthew Hale   Chief Financial Officer
### [§2364. Omitted]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section catchline and subsec. (a) were transferred to chapter 301 and redesignated as section 4014 of this title. Subsecs. (b) and (c) were transferred to subchapter III of chapter 303 and redesignated as subsecs. (a) and (b), respectively, of section 4125 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<CIK>                                          0001063018
<NAME>                                         ISG RESOURCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1.00
<CASH>                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    28,826,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                        320,494
<INVENTORY>                                       2,651,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 33,295,696
<PP&E>                                           40,631,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6,967,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  227,607,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23,292,826
<BONDS>                                         100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                100
<OTHER-SE>                                       28,435,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    227,607,064
<SALES>                                          91,079,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                118,463,393
<CGS>                                            60,908,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    80,889,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 25,143,193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    129,566
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9,940,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,490,721
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,579,541
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 911,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        911,180
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
APPENDIX K 

SEATURTLE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES 
[This page intentionally left blank.]
K-1 Appendix K
K-2 Appendix K
K-3 Appendix K
K-4 Appendix K
K-5 Appendix K
K-6 Appendix K
K-7 Appendix K
K-8 Appendix K
K-9 Appendix K
K-10 Appendix K
K-11 Appendix K
K-12 Appendix K
K-13 Appendix K
K-14 Appendix K
K-15 Appendix K
K-16 Appendix K
K-17 Appendix K
K-18 Appendix K
K-19 Appendix K
K-20 Appendix K
### §2279bb. Definitions

For purposes of this part:

#### (1) Compensation

The term "compensation" means any payment of money or the provision of any other thing of current or potential value in connection with employment.

#### (2) Core capital

The term "core capital" means, with respect to the Corporation, the sum of the following (as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles):

(A) The par value of outstanding common stock.

(B) The par value of outstanding preferred stock.

(C) Paid-in capital.

(D) Retained earnings.

#### (3) Director

The term "Director" means the Director of the Office of Secondary Market Oversight of the Farm Credit Administration, selected under section 2279aa–11(a)(3) of this title.

#### (4) Office

The term "Office" means the Office of Secondary Market Oversight of the Farm Credit Administration, established in section 2279aa–11(a) of this title.

#### (5) Regulatory capital

The term "regulatory capital" means, with respect to the Corporation, the core capital of the Corporation plus an allowance for losses and guarantee claims, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

#### (6) State

The term "State" means the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title VIII, §8.31, as added Pub. L. 102–237, title V, §503(b)(2), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1871.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Torvec, Inc.
 May 12, 2011
    
    /s/ Richard A. Kaplan

Richard A. KaplanChief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2011
    
    /s/ Robert W. Fishback

Robert W. FishbackChief Financial Officer
 Issuer Statement
#### § 381.153 [Reserved]
#### Henry H. Horner *et al.*Admrs v. Henry S. Goe.

Dismissal of *appeal—insufficiency of appeal bond.*On an appeal to the circuit court from an order of a county court allowing certain claims against an estate, it is held to be error for the circuit court to dismiss the appeal for insufficiency of the appeal bond, except on failure to file a good and sufficient bond, in a time fixed by the court.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. Joseph Gillespie, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. G. *&*G. A. Kcerner, for the appellants.

Mr. Vm. H. Underwood, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from an order of dismissal by the court below of an appeal taken to it from the county court from an *179order of allowance of certain claims against the estate of a deceased person.

The bill of exceptions merely sets out the motion to dismiss, and the order of dismissal, without stating the grounds of the motion or of the dismissal; and it is urged that it must be presumed the court below decided correctly, unless the contrary appears, and that in this case the contrary does not appear.

But it appeal’s that the appellant excepted to the order of dismissal, and the record shows an appeal bond. We can conceive of no other ground of the dismissal than the insufficiency of the appeal bond.

Section 138 of Statute of Wills, Scates’Comp. 1215, allows appeals from all judgments and orders of the court of probate to the circuit court in favor of any person aggrieved, “as in any other cases”—that is, as in cases before justices of the peace.

Section* 65 of the Justices of the Peace Act, Scates’ Comp. 709, declares that an appellant shall in no wise be prejudiced by reason of the insufficiency of the appeal bond, provided he will in a reasonable time, to be fixed by the court, execute and file a good and sufficient bond. This provision embraces the bond in question by virtue of the aforenamed section 138, and the appeal should not have been dismissed for insufficiency of the appeal bond, except on failure to file a good and sufficient bond, in a time fixed by the court.

The record shows an erroneous ruling of the court.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT 

USDA Seeks Applicants for Renewable Energy Systems and Energy Efficiency Improvement 

Projects under the Rural Energy for America Program

WASHINGTON, March 15, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

invited applications for loan guarantees and grants for Renewable Energy Systems and Energy Efficiency 

Improvement Projects. 

These loan guarantees and grants are part of USDA’s Rural Energy for America Program (REAP), which was 

created under the 2008 Farm Bill and reauthorized under the 2014 Farm Bill. This notice seeks applications for 

FY 2018 funding. The deadline to apply for grants is April 30, 2018. Applications for loan guarantees are 

accepted year round.

REAP helps agricultural producers and rural small businesses reduce energy costs and consumption by 

purchasing and installing renewable energy systems and making energy efficiency improvements in their 

operations. Eligible systems may derive energy from wind, solar, hydro-electric, ocean, hydrogen, geothermal 

or renewable biomass (including anaerobic digesters). 

Additional information about the program and how to apply for this funding is available on page 10829 of the 

March 13, 2018 Federal Register. 

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
# C_2013336EN.01001802.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Iliad and Others v Commission

(Case T-325/10) (1)

1

(State Aid - Compensation for public service costs in connection with a very high-speed broadband electronic communications network in the Hauts-de-Seine department - Decision finding no State aid - Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Serious difficulties - Altmark judgment - Service of general economic interest - Market failure - Overcompensation)

2013/C 336/36

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Iliad (Paris, France); Free infrastructure (Paris); and Free (Paris) (represented by: T. Cabot, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: The French Republic (represented: initially by G. de Bergues and J. Gstalter, and subsequently by D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents); the Republic of Poland (represented initally by M. Szpunar and B. Majczyna, and subsequently by B. Majczyna, acting as Agents); the Hauts-de-Seine department (France) (represented by: J.-D. Bloch and G. O’Mahony, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 7426 final of 30 September 2009 concerning the compensation for public service costs for the establishment and operation of a very high-speed broadband electronic communications network in the Hauts-de-Seine department (State Aid N 331/2008 — France).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Iliad, Free infrastructure and Free to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iliad, Free infrastructure and Free to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Hauts-de-Seine department, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland to pay their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hauts-de-Seine department, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland to pay their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>         0001063293
<NAME>        AMCI INTERNATIONAL, INC.

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            13854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1471
<OTHER-SE>                                      (15325)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (5213)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)


</TABLE>
kl06024_ex10-2.htm


    
      

    

     

    Exhibit 10.2

    
 

    Warranty

    


    Party A:
Wu Huimin, Liu Jian-Hua, Xu Jin-Gen, Ye Huajie and Mei Xiangdong.

    


    Party B:
Hunan Zhaoheng Hydropower Co. Ltd.

    Legal
representative: Zhu Hong, Title: Chairman.

    Address:
Dianzhan Road, Shimen County, Hunan Province.

    


    Party C
(Guarantor): Huimin Hydropower Development Co., Ltd.

    Legal
Representative: Wu Huimin Title: Chairman.

    Address:
84 Fuqian East Road, Xihe Town, She Autonomous Region, Jingning County, Zhejiang
Province.

    


    On June
15, 2008, Party A and Party B signed the "Equity Transfer Agreement of Jingrong
Industrial Development Co., Ltd. in Rongjiang County of Guizhou Province"
(hereinafter referred to “Transfer Agreement”). In the agreement, Party A
transferred all its shares in Jingrong Industrial Development Co., Ltd to Party
B. Under Item 5 of the agreement, Party B’s only obligation is the payment
outlined in the agreement and is not liable for any other liabilities. However,
after Party B fulfill its obligations under item 3 and item 4, there might still
have some contingent liabilities with Jingrong Industrial Development Co., Ltd.
The agreement provides that such contingent liabilities shall be guaranteed by a
third party agreed by mutual parties. Now, Party C is willing to provide
guarantee to above mentioned contingent liabilities, which is also agreed by
Party A and Party B. The three parties reached the following
agreement:

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              Party
      C is jointly liable for and is willing to guarantee all contingent
      liabilities mentioned in Transfer
Agreement.

            


    

    
      	 	 
	
              2.  

            	
              This
      guarantee is valid within two years from the date any contingent liability
      arises in the future.

            


    

    
      	 	 
	
              3.  

            	
              This
      guarantee is in three copies, effective after being signed / sealed by all
      three parties. The three parties will each keep one copy. As appendix to
      of Transfer Agreement, it’s equally effective to the Transfer
      Agreement.

            


    

     

    
      	
              Party
      A:

            	
              Party
      B:

            	
              Party
      C:

            


    

     

    
      	
              Date

            	
              Date

            	
              Date
MÁS

2007

Cáncer de pulmón

Cuando una persona tiene cáncer 

de pulmón, las células de los 

pulmones se multiplican de forma 

descontrolada. Este tipo de cáncer 

causa más muertes que cualquier 

otro tipo de cáncer. Cada año, 

mueren más mujeres por cáncer de 

pulmón que por cáncer de mama.

¿Cuál es la causa del cáncer de 

pulmón? 

• Fumar es la principal causa del 

cáncer de pulmón.

• Entre más y durante más 

tiempo fume, mas aumenta las 

posibilidades de contraer cáncer 

de pulmón.

¿Puedo reducir el riesgo de tener 

cancer de pulmon?

• Si fuma, intente dejar de hacerlo. 

Si no fuma, no comience a hacerlo. 

• Aléjese de la gente que fuma. 

Respirar el humo de los fumadores 

también puede causar cáncer de 

pulmón.

¿Cuáles son los signos del cáncer 

de pulmón? 

• Tos persistente 

• Dolor en el pecho 

• Pérdida de peso 

• Pérdida del apetito 

• Expectoración de moco con 

sangre 

• Dificultad para respirar 

• Ronquera

• Infecciones pulmonares 

frecuentes, tales como neumonía 

¿Cómo se detecta el cáncer de 

pulmón? 

• Radiografía o tomografía de tórax 

para detectar manchas en los 

pulmones.

• Observación microscópica de 

células expectoradas.

• El médico puede utilizar un 

pequeño tubo flexible con una 

cámara que se introduce en la 

vía respiratoria. Este dispositivo 

observa partes del pulmón 

de apariencia anormal y toma 

muestras de los tejidos. 

Hay dos tipos de cáncer de 

pulmón: 

• Carcinoma microcítico de pulmón 

• Carcinomas broncopulmonares no 

microcíticos

Cada tipo de cáncer de pulmón 

crece y se disemina de distintas 

formas y requiere un tratamiento 

diferente. 

Lung Cancer
FDA Office of Women’s Health http://www.fda.gov/womens

TAKE TIME TO CARE... For yourself, for those who need you.

Etapas del cáncer de pulmón: 

• “La etapa” define hasta dónde se 

ha diseminado el cáncer. A veces, 

el cáncer de pulmón se detecta 

en forma temprana y sólo se 

localiza en los pulmones. En otros 

casos, se extiende a otras partes 

del cuerpo. 

• Al detectar el cáncer de pulmón, 

el médico realizará pruebas 

para verificar hasta dónde se 

ha diseminado la enfermedad. 

La prueba le permite al médico 

decidir el tratamiento a indicar. 

• La eficacia de estos tratamientos 

depende del grado de 

diseminación del cáncer. 

¿Cuál es el tratamiento para el 

cáncer de pulmón? 

• Cirugía—Una operación para 

extirpar el cáncer

• Quimioterapia—Medicamentos que 

destruyen las células cancerosas

• Radiación—Altas dosis de rayosX que destruyen las células 

cancerosas

Es posible que el paciente requiera 

dos o más de estos tratamientos.

Para obtener más información:

Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA)

http://www.fda.gov

Instituto Nacional del Cáncer (NCI)

Teléfono: 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237) 

(Se habla Español)

http://www.cancer.gov

Cáncer de pulmón
# C_2010288EN.01002002.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny, Izba Finansowa, Wydział II (Republic of Poland), lodged on 26 July 2010 — Pak-Holdco Sp zoo v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu

(Case C-372/10)

()

(2010/C 288/34)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny, Izba Finansowa, Wydział II

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Pak-Holdco Sp zoo

Respondent: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu

Questions referred

| 1. | In interpreting Article 7(1) of Directive 69/335/EEC, (1) must a national court take account of the provisions of amending directives, in particular Directives 73/79/EEC (2) and 73/80/EEC, (3) even though those directives were no longer in force when the Republic of Poland acceded to the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In interpreting Article 7(1) of Directive 69/335/EEC, (1) must a national court take account of the provisions of amending directives, in particular Directives 73/79/EEC (2) and 73/80/EEC, (3) even though those directives were no longer in force when the Republic of Poland acceded to the European Union?

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, does the exclusion of the assets of a capital company from the amount on which capital duty is charged, as laid down in the first indent of Article 5(3) of Directive 69/335/EEC, concern only the assets of a capital company which has had an increase in capital? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, does the exclusion of the assets of a capital company from the amount on which capital duty is charged, as laid down in the first indent of Article 5(3) of Directive 69/335/EEC, concern only the assets of a capital company which has had an increase in capital?

---

(1)  OJ, English Special Edition 1969(II), p. 412.

(2)  OJ 1973 L 103, p. 13.

(3)  OJ 1973 L 103, p. 15.

---