alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA to Create Plan to Expand Recreation Economies and Help People Thrive 

Across Rural America

Rural Development, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and U.S. Forest Service 

Partner to Create New Tools and Resources

WASHINGTON, Jan. 19, 2023 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced that it will 

create a plan to expand recreation economies to help people thrive across rural America. 

Through a Memorandum of Understanding, USDA Rural Development, the National Institute of Food and 

Agriculture (NIFA) and the U.S. Forest Service will partner to develop an annual plan to expand economic 

opportunities related to recreation in communities surrounding America’s national forests.

The annual plan will outline the ways the agencies will partner to conduct program outreach, host informational 

sessions and workshops, and develop toolkits to help people access the resources they need to thrive in 

recreation economies. The agencies will also:

• Provide technical and planning assistance to help local, state and Tribal leaders develop regional 

economic development plans that advance recreation economies.

• Provide funding under Rural Development and National Institute of Food and Agriculture programs to 

help U.S. Forest Service gateway communities expand resilient recreation infrastructure and business 

development projects that create jobs.

• Develop and maintain strategic partnerships, and more.

Today’s announcement supports the Biden-Harris Administration’s interagency effort, known as the Federal 

Interagency Council on Outdoor Recreation, to create safe, affordable and equitable opportunities for 

Americans to get outdoors.

For more information, visit: https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/USDA-Interagency-Outdoor-RecreationEconomy-Memorandum-of-Understanding.pdf.

To subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 51068 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
TAMMY JO MCLAIN , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 183

- 2

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Tammy Jo McLain has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
McLain h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-51068 Document: 00512751157 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014No. 13

- 51068

Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-51068 Document: 00512751157 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
# C_2007042EN.01003303.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/33

---

Action brought on 15 December 2006 — Unicredito Italiano SpA v OHIM — Union Investment Privatfonds (1 Unicredit)

(Case T-398/06)

(2007/C 42/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Unicredito Italiano SpA (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: G. Floridia and R. Floridia, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH.

Other party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Unicredito Italiano SpA

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘1 Unicredit’, registration application No 2.055.069 for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41 and 42.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word marks ‘UNIFONDS’ (No 881.995) and ‘UNIRAK’ (No 991.997) and figurative mark ‘UNIZINS’ (No 2.016.954) for services in Class 36 (capital investment).

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: to allow the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: to dismiss the action.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Misapplication of the theory of the extended protection of ‘serial marks’ as formulated by the Court of First Instance in Case T-194/03 Il Ponte Finanziaria v OHIM [2006] ECR II-0000 (Bainbridge).

Pleas in law:

Il Ponte Finanziaria

OHIM

(Bainbridge)

---
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis 

REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY 

AND 

INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY 

 OF NORTH AMERICA MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

v. Record No. 0353-96-3 AUGUST 6, 1996 

 

RALPH ALLEN FRYE 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Kathryn Spruill Lingle; Midkiff & Hiner, on 

brief), for appellants. 

 (Ginger Jonas Largen; Morefield, Kendrick, 

Hess & Largen, on brief), for appellee. 

 Reynolds Metals Company and its insurer (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission erred in finding that it failed to prove 

that Ralph Allen Frye was able to return to his pre-injury work 

as of February 2, 1995. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs 

of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 

5A:27. 

 "General principles of workman's compensation law provide 

that '[i]n an application for review of any award on the ground 

of change in condition, the burden is on the party alleging such 

change to prove his allegations by a preponderance of the 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

evidence.'" Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Bateman, 4 Va. App. 

459, 464, 359 S.E.2d 98, 101 (1987) (quoting Pilot Freight 

Carriers, Inc. v. Reeves, 1 Va. App. 435, 438-39, 339 S.E.2d 570, 

572 (1986)). Furthermore, "it is fundamental that a finding of 

fact made by the Commission is conclusive and binding upon this 

court on review. A question raised by conflicting medical 

opinion is a question of fact." Commonwealth v. Powell, 2 Va. 

App. 712, 714, 347 S.E.2d 532, 533 (1986). 

 The commission accepted the opinions of Drs. Neal A. Jewell 

and Pierce D. Nelson. Their opinions support the commission's 

conclusion that Frye was not able to fully perform all of the 

duties of his pre-injury work as of February 2, 1995. In its 

role as fact finder, the commission rejected the contrary opinion 

of Dr. Jim C. Brasfield. "Questions raised by conflicting 

medical opinions must be decided by the commission." Penley v. 

Island Creek Coal Co., 8 Va. App. 310, 318, 381 S.E.2d 231, 236 

(1989). 

 The restrictions Dr. Jewell placed upon Frye's physical 

abilities in 1992 and 1995 were consistent with a 1991 strength 

evaluation report. The record supports the commission's finding 

that no evidence showed that Frye's condition had improved 

significantly since the 1991 study. Therefore, the commission 

did not err in relying upon the study, which supports the 

commission's finding that Frye's pre-injury work was unsuitable 

to his residual capacity. 
 3 

 Based upon this record, we cannot conclude as a matter of 

law that employer's evidence sustained its burden of proving that 

Frye was able to return to his pre-injury work as of February 2, 

1995. Tomko v. Michael's Plastering Co., 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 

S.E.2d 833, 835 (1970). Accordingly, we affirm the commission's 

decision. 

 Affirmed.
Facility Lead Man

ganese Nickel Chromium Arsenic Total 1 0.008 (16) 0.04 (80) 0.02 (40) 0.02 (40) 0.07 (140) 0.16 (320) 2 0.07 (140) 0.3 (600) 0.05 (100) 0.0006 (1.2) 0.04 (80) 0.54 (1080) 3 0.001 (2) 0.003 (6) 0.0015 (3) 0.0009 (1.8) 0.014 (28) 0.02 (40) 4 0.00002 (0.04) 0.0002 (0.4) 0.000008 (0.016) 0.00002 (0.04) 0.000007 (0.014) 0.0002 (0.4) 5 0.0002 (0.4) 0.00007 (0.14) 0.000009 (0.02) 0.000001 (0.002) 0.00008 (0.16) 0.0003 (0.6) 6 0.0001 (0.2) 0.00004 (0.08) 0.00003 (0.06) 0.00004 (0.08) 0.00002 (0.04) 0.0002 (0.4)
7 0.000002 (0.004) 0.000005 (0.01) 0.000001 (0.002) 0.000004 (0.008) 0.000001 (0.002) 0.00001 (0.02) 8 0.000003 (0.006) 0.00001 (0.02) 0.000005 (0.01) 0.000003 (0.006) 0.000005 (0.01) 0.00003 (0.06) 

# Non
- Mercury Metal HAPs

– Emissions Estimates Based on Test Data in tons per year (and lbs/yr in parentheses)CARBON ADSORPTION & DESORPTION
CARBON REGENERATION KILN

PREGNANT TANK BARREN TANK EW CELL ELECTROWINNING

FURNACE RETORT RETORTING & SMELTING CARBON

ORE MINING GOLD LEACHING 

# Gold Ore Processing

– 3 Process Groups

- Proposed Approach for MACT

ROASTERS & AUTOCLAVES

FURNACE RETORT RETORTING & SMELTING MERRILL-CROWE

Hg

Hg Hg Hg Hg Hg Hg Hg

Hg

Hg

Ore pre
- treatment group Non
- carbon group Carbon group

MACT Limit in units of lbs of Hg per tons of ore MACT Limit in units of lbs Hg per ton of concentrate MACT Limit in units of lbs Hg per ton of concentrateDraft - March 14, 2010 

## Total Estimated Emissions of Cyanide from Gold Mines in Tons per Year Facility Range 1 5.1 - 9.2 2 4.9 - 8.3 3 5.1 - 8.2 4 3.3 - 5.5 5 3.0 - 5.1 6 2.1 - 3.6 7 2.0 - 3.4 8 1.6 - 2.9 9 1.6 - 2.7 10 1.4 - 2.4 11 1.4 - 2.4 12 1.1 - 1.9 13 0.9 - 1.6 14 0.8 - 1.4 15 0.7 - 1.2 16 0.5 - 0.9 17 0.4 - 0.7 18 0.03 - 0.04 19 0.02 - 0.033

- 1 5

- 2010
Mercury Emissions Estimates for Gold Mine Ore Processing and Production (in pounds per year) for 2007
Facility Total Mercury Emissions 1 455 2 878 3 932 4 202 5 109 6 108 7 74 8 35 9 34 10 22 11 26 12 6 13 6 14 8 15 3 16 6 17 4 18 5 19 4 Total 4,897
### §466. Reserves of banks in dependencies or insular possessions

National banks, or banks organized under local laws, located in a dependency or insular possession or any part of the United States outside the continental United States, may remain nonmember banks, and shall in that event maintain reserves and comply with all the conditions now provided by law regulating them; or said banks may with the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, become member banks of any one of the reserve districts, and shall in that event take stock, maintain reserves, and be subject to all the other provisions of this chapter.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §19(h), formerly §19 (par. 11), 38 Stat. 270; Aug. 15, 1914, ch. 252, 38 Stat. 692; June 21, 1917, ch. 32, §10, 40 Stat. 240; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704; Pub. L. 86–70, §8(b), June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 142; renumbered §19(h), Pub. L. 89–597, §2(b), Sept. 21, 1966, 80 Stat. 824.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251, known as the Federal Reserve Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 226 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of subsec. (h), formerly eleventh par., of section 19 of act Dec. 23, 1913, as redesignated by Pub. L. 89–597.

#### Amendments

1959—Pub. L. 86–70 struck out "in Alaska or" before "in a dependency".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Working with PHMSA 
-  Pipeline Grants 

# In This Section

                      -  Pipeline Grants Program Overview 
                      -  Technical Assistant Grants (TAG) 
                      -  Pipeline Safety Base Grants 
                      -  One Call Grants 
                      -  Pipeline Emergency Response Grants 
                      -  Research & Development Awards 
                      -  Competitive Academic Agreement Program 
                      -  State Damage Prevention Grants 
                      -  Pipeline Safety Underground Natural Gas Storage Grants 
                      -  Natural Gas Distribution Infrastructure Safety and Modernization Grant Program (NGDISM) 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Delphi eInvoicing System                   
                  -                                          Grants.gov                   
                  -                                          Office of Management and Budget (OMB)-Grants Management                   
                  -                                          OMB Circulars                   
                  -                                          Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements fo...                   

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) Grants
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Research and Development Awards

## Research & Development Program Awards

PHMSA's Pipeline Safety Research & Development awards sponsor projects focused on providing solutions that will improve pipeline safety, reduce the environmental impact of failures, and enhance the reliability of the nation's 2.8 million mile pipeline transportation network. These awards align with PHMSA's research strategic plan, which encourages a collaborative approach to addressing pipeline challenges. Further, PHMSA's pipeline safety research and development program, consists of the Competitive Academic Agreement Program (CAAP), which encourages the participation of student researchers to develop innovative approaches to research and problem-solving the nation's biggest pipeline challenges.

More information on Research & Development Awards is available.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Horizon Holding Corporation (the Company), for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allan Woodlief, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Allan Woodlief      
|Allan Woodlief          
|Chief Financial Officer 
|                        
|Dated: November 15, 2004



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Horizon Holding Corporation and will be retained by Horizon Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SUPREME COURT

Of NEVADA
(0) 1947A 'Ne Man-- Parraguirr 2

LANALSIKOV LOWE, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest. No. 63096



### ORDER DENYING PETITIONS Docket Nos. 63107, 63108, and 63109 are proper person petitions for a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, prohibition. Docket No. 63096 is a proper person petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner requests that the charges pending against him be dismissed with prejudice and that various attorneys and the district court judge be charged with crimes and/or suspended from the practice of law. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in these matters. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330; NRS 34.360; NRS 34.370; NRS 34.700; NRS 34.710. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petitions DENIED.

Hardesty J.SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A

, ),1) cc: Lanalsikov Lowe

Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Clark County Public Defender Eighth District Court Clerk

3
<TABLE> <S> <C><ARTICLE>    5<S>                                                      <C><PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS<PERIOD-START>                                   Jan-01-2000<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Dec-31-2000<PERIOD-END>                                     Sep-30-2000<CASH>                                             1,283,750<SECURITIES>                                               0<RECEIVABLES>                                          1,014<ALLOWANCES>                                               0<INVENTORY>                                                0<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,285,027<PP&E>                                            15,610,881<DEPRECIATION>                                     4,333,056<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    12,775,190<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                466,837<BONDS>                                                    0<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0<PREFERRED>                                                0<COMMON>                                                   0<OTHER-SE>                                        12,176,353<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      12,775,190<SALES>                                                    0<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1,332,203<CGS>                                                      0<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     126,520<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      905,075<INCOME-TAX>                                         905,075<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  905,075<DISCONTINUED>                                             0<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0<CHANGES>                                                  0<NET-INCOME>                                         905,075<EPS-BASIC>                                            18.12<EPS-DILUTED>                                          18.12</TABLE>
#### § 327.8 Import products; equipment and means of conveyance used in handling to be maintained in sanitary condition.

Compartments of steamships, sailing vessels, railroad cars, and other means of conveyance transporting any product to the United States, and all trucks, chutes, platforms, racks, tables, tools, utensils, and all other devices used in moving and handling any product offered for importation into the United States, shall be maintained in a sanitary condition.
### §5114. Expenses of performing and executing defense readiness missions

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, and every February 1 thereafter, the Commandant shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that adequately represents a calculation of the annual costs and expenditures of performing and executing all defense readiness mission activities, including—

(1) all expenses related to the Coast Guard's coordination, training, and execution of defense readiness mission activities in the Coast Guard's capacity as an armed force (as such term is defined in section 101 of title 10) in support of Department of Defense national security operations and activities or for any other military department or Defense Agency (as such terms are defined in such section);

(2) costs associated with Coast Guard detachments assigned in support of the defense readiness mission of the Coast Guard; and

(3) any other related expenses, costs, or matters the Commandant considers appropriate or otherwise of interest to Congress.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXII, §11256(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4056.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this section, referred to in text, is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 117–263, which was approved Dec. 23, 2022.