alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 381.27 Inauguration of service; notification concerning regulations; status of uninspected poultry products.

The inspector in charge or his supervisor shall, upon or prior to the inauguration of service, inform the operator of the establishment of the requirements of the regulations. If the establishment at the time service is inaugurated contains any poultry product which has not been inspected and marked in compliance with the regulations, its identity shall be maintained, and it shall not be represented or dealt with as a product which has been inspected. Such products may not be shipped in commerce unless such products are eligible for such shipment under an exemption from inspection under subpart C and comply with all requirements of said subpart.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Invites Applications for Grants to Strengthen Rural Cooperatives That 

Serve Socially Disadvantaged Groups

WASHINGTON, April 3, 2024 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Dr. Basil Gooden today announced that USDA is inviting applications for grants to strengthen rural 

cooperatives that serve and are made up of people who are part of socially disadvantaged groups in rural areas.

USDA is making the $3 million in grants available under the Socially Disadvantaged Groups Grant program to 

help new and existing cooperatives strengthen their hands-on assistance, like leadership training and strategic 

planning, to small business owners and agricultural producers. This program is part of USDA’s commitment to 

ensuring that people of all backgrounds have the resources they need to thrive.

Rural cooperatives and Cooperative Development Centers are eligible to apply for grants to provide assistance 

to rural small business owners and agricultural producers from socially disadvantaged groups. The maximum 

award is $175,000. 

USDA is particularly interested in applications that will advance Biden-Harris Administration priorities to:

• Reduce climate pollution and increase resilience to the impacts of climate change through economic 

support to rural communities.

• Ensure all rural residents have equitable access to Rural Development (RD) programs and benefits from 

RD-funded projects; and 

• Help rural communities recover economically through more and better market opportunities and through 

improved infrastructure.

Additional information on these key priorities is available at https://www.rd.usda.gov/priority-points.

Electronic applications must be submitted to grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 3, 2024. 

Interested applicants are encouraged to contact their local USDA Rural Development State Office well in 

advance of the application deadline to discuss their project and ask any questions about the program or the 

application process. Contact information for state offices can be found at http://www.rd.usda.gov/contactus/state-offices.

Additional information on how to apply is available on page 22979 of the April 3, 2024, Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Operations and the Consolidated Balance sheets
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  158,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,400
<INVENTORY>                                    142,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               342,500
<PP&E>                                         375,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 614,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          244,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   614,800
<SALES>                                        496,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               496,500
<CGS>                                          264,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  264,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
        


</TABLE>
622N

TRAVEL MANAGEMENT

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft Resource Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
March 2007

Poomuo4}

TRAVEL ROUTE INVENTORY

Township 11 South
Range 9 East

iguoneN yseu04
“

2

os

Gila and Salt River Principal Meridian, Arizona

yuewnuo;,

2

i, National Monument Boundary

Public Lands Administered by the
Bureau of Land Management

State Trust Lands

Military Reservation

—— Monument Travel Route Inventory

Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheriod

NAD27 Datum

1 i} 1 Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
for the use of this map for purposes not intended by the BLM, or
to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information
shown. Spatial information may not meet National map Accuracy
Standards. This information may be updated without notification.

(S23) United States Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Management

SF (7 Tucson Field Office

Arizona

S
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

83-15 

July 7, 1983 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 3(16) Definitions. Administrator

4001(a)(1) Definitions. Administrator

4041(a) Termination by Plan Administrator. Filing of Notice of Intent to Terminate 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of June 1, 1983 requesting reconsideration of our April 19, 1983 initial

determination in the above case. The documents submitted and your letter in support of your position have been

considered. I find that the initial determination is correct. 

We initially determined that the Notice of Intent to Terminate filed by * * * (the "Company"), was valid because

the Company is the plan administrator and thus authorized under ERISA § 4041(a), 29 U.S.C. § 1341(a), to file such

a notice. Our conclusion that the Company is the plan administrator was in turn based on the following specific

provisions to that effect in § 7.1 of the plan document: "[t]he Company shall be the Plan administrator . . . for purposes

of [ERISA]. . . ." 

Your request for reconsideration is based on documents (i.e. two Supplemental Agreements and the Master Trust

Agreement) not separately discussed in our initial determination. The position of your client is that these documents

show the plan administrator not to be the Company [*2] but rather the "Joint Administrative Committee" of both

employer and union representatives created by § 7.9 of the plan document (the "Committee"). 

We recognize, as you first argue, that the Supplemental Agreements specify for the Committee certain reporting and

disclosure functions that could be interpreted to correspond to functions of an administrator under ERISA § 104(b), 29

U.S.C. § 1024(b). We also recognize, as you further argue, that a reference in the Master Trust Agreement to " the

Administrator" could be interpreted to mean the Committee, when considered in light of a related provision in the

Supplemental Agreements. 

 However, these provisions of the Supplemental Agreements do not contradict or supersede the express provision

in the plan document that the Company is the plan administrator for purposes of ERISA. Therefore there is no

inconsistency or conflict which requires the Supplemental Agreements to be controlling. 

Moreover, the Supplemental Agreements do not specifically designate a plan administrator, as you note. Therefore

the Supplemental Agreements supersede the plan document only in respects other than the identity of the plan

administrator, and § 7.1 of [*3] the plan document remains a valid, specific designation of the administrator with the

meaning of ERISA, § 3(16)(A)(i), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(16)(A)(i). 

For these reasons the initial determination is affirmed. This constitutes a final decision under 29 C.F.R. §

2606.36(b), and you have therefore exhausted your administrative remedies. 

I hope this has been of assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### § 311.27 Injured animals slaughtered at unusual hours.

When it is necessary for humane reasons to slaughter an injured animal at night or on Sunday or a holiday when the inspector cannot be obtained, the carcass and all parts of all livestock except for cattle shall be kept for inspection, with the head and all viscera except the stomach, bladder, and intestines held by the natural attachments. If all parts are not so kept for inspection, the carcass shall be condemned. If, on inspection of a carcass slaughtered in the absence of an inspector, any lesion or other evidence is found indicating that the animal was sick or diseased, or affected with any other condition requiring condemnation of the animal on ante-mortem inspection, or if there is lacking evidence of the condition which rendered emergency slaughter necessary, the carcass shall be condemned. The parts and carcasses of cattle slaughtered in the absence of an inspector shall not be used for human food.

[35 FR 15569, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 69 FR 1874, Jan. 12, 2004]
# C_2010246EN.01002601.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (Belgium) lodged on 2 July 2010 — SIAT SA v Belgian State

(Case C-318/10)

()

2010/C 246/44

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de Cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SIAT SA

Appellant:

Respondent: Belgian State

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 49 of the EC Treaty, in the version applicable to this case (the facts giving rise to the dispute having occurred prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009), be interpreted as precluding national legislation of a Member State according to which payments for supplies or services are not to be regarded as deductible business expenses where they are made or attributed directly or indirectly to a taxpayer resident in another Member State or to a foreign establishment which, by virtue of the legislation of the country in which they are established, are not subject there to a tax on income or are subject there, for the relevant income, to a tax regime which is appreciably more advantageous than the one to which such income is subject in the Member State whose national legislation is at issue, unless the taxpayer proves, by any legal means, that such payments relate to genuine and proper transactions and do not exceed the normal limits, whereas such proof is not required, as a precondition for the deduction of payments for supplies or services made to a taxpayer residing in that Member State, even if the taxpayer is not subject to any tax on income or is subject to a tax regime which is appreciably more advantageous than the one laid down by the ordinary law of that State?

---
#### *In re*David Littlejohn, a Minor.

(No. 60123;

First District (2nd Division)

November 19, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.

PER CURIAM.
#### § 354.162 Determining compliance with § 354.161.

A qualified veterinary supervisor of the rabbit inspection service shall investigate the manner of operation of the inspection system to determine the adequacy of the post-mortem examination and the compliance with the requirements contained in §§ 354.160 to 354.162 prior to approving the official plant for the inspection of ready-to-cook rabbits. This supervisor, as well as any official graders who may be stationed in the official plant, shall periodically observe the inspection operations in the official plant to determine that the requirements of §§ 354.160 to 354.162 are being met.
### §2316. Discharge within three months before expiration of enlistment

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, any enlisted member may be discharged at any time within three months before the expiration of his term of enlistment or extended enlistment without prejudice to any right, privilege, or benefit that he would have received, except pay and allowances for the unexpired period not served, or to which he would thereafter become entitled, had he served his full term of enlistment or extended enlistment.

(Added June 8, 1955, ch. 136, §2, 69 Stat. 88, §370; amended Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(A), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; renumbered §2316, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §113(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4221.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 370 of this title as this section.

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to enlisted member for reference to enlisted man.
#### § 381.192 Penalties inapplicable to carriers.

No carrier shall be subject to the penalties of the Act, other than the penalties for violation of section 11, by reason of his receipt, carriage, holding, or delivery, in the usual course of business, as a carrier, of poultry or poultry products, owned by another person, unless the carrier has knowledge, or is in possession of facts which would cause a reasonable person to believe that such poultry or poultry products were not inspected or marked in accordance with the provisions of the Act or where otherwise not eligible for transportation under the Act, or unless the carrier refuses to furnish on request of a representative of the Secretary, the name and address of the person from whom he received such poultry or poultry products, and copies of all documents, if any there be, pertaining to the delivery of the poultry or poultry products to such carrier.
-  Home 
-  Transporting Infectious Substances 

# In This Section

                      -  Transporting Infectious Substances Overview 
                      -  Infectious Substance Special Permits 
                      -  COVID-19 Information 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Additional PHMSA COVID-19 Resources                   

## Contact Us

Hazardous Materials Energetic Materials Approvals
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-4511****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922****Fax:**202-366-3753**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# COVID-19 Information

The Coronavirus (COVID-19) clinical samples are a "Category B" material for transportation, defined as an infectious substance that is not in a form generally capable of causing permanent disability or life-threatening or fatal disease in otherwise healthy humans or animals when exposure to it occurs. COVID-19 contaminated waste or reusable material derived from the medical treatment of COVID-19 patients is considered regulated medical waste.

PHMSA's PowerPoint presentation provides a quick reference for medical facilities, clinical laboratories and hazardous waste carriers to safely package and transport COVID-19 specimens, cultures, isolates and medical waste.

## Handling and Disposing of COVID-19

Please see important CDC guidance for handling and disposing of COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 clinical samples and waste:

Interim Laboratory Biosafety Guidelines for Handling and Processing Specimens Associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings

Interim Guidance for Collection and Submission of Postmortem Specimens from Deceased Persons Under Investigation (PUI) for COVID-19, February 2020

## Guidance on Workplace Safety

For guidance on workplace safety see:

OSHA Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19 and Additional Resources.

## Staying Informed

Because the current COVID-19 pandemic is rapidly evolving, please continue to monitor important public health and response updates at:
                      - CDC Website
                      - Coronavirus.gov
                      - FEMA Website
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Improve Solid Waste Management for People in

Rural Areas

WASHINGTON, Oct. 3, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under Secretary 

Xochitl Torres Small today announced that the department is accepting grant applications to reduce water 

pollution in rural areas through improvements to solid waste management.

Applications are being accepted under the Solid Waste Management Grants program. USDA provides these

grants to organizations that offer technical assistance or training to help rural communities manage solid waste 

sites and eliminate water pollution. The program is one of the many ways USDA promotes a healthy 

community and environment with loans and grants that ensure people, children and families have clean water 

and safe sewer systems to prevent runoff and pollution.

Eligible applicants include public bodies, nonprofit organizations, federally recognized tribes and academic 

institutions in rural areas and towns with 10,000 or fewer residents. Special consideration may be given to 

projects serving areas with fewer than 5,500 or 2,500 people, multiple states or lower-income populations.

USDA expects to make approximately $4 million available through the program.

Funds may be used to:

• Evaluate current landfill conditions to identify threats to water resources.

• Provide technical assistance or training to enhance the operation and maintenance of active landfills.

• Provide technical assistance or training to help communities reduce the amount of solid waste coming 

into a landfill.

• Provide technical assistance or training to prepare for the closure and future use of a landfill site.

Projects must be completed within 12 months.

Applications must be submitted through Grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. ET on Dec. 31, 2022.

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration

to help communities create more and better market opportunities, advance equity and combat climate change. 

These extra points will increase the likelihood of funding. For more information, visit 

https://www.rd.usda.gov/priority-points.

Additional information is available on Grants.gov.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender
### §66. Personal liability of representatives of stockholders

Persons holding stock as executors, administrators, guardians, or trustees, shall not be personally subject to any liabilities as stockholders; but the estates and funds in their hands shall be liable in like manner and to the same extent as the testator, intestate, ward, or person interested in such trust funds would be, if living and competent to act and hold the stock in his own name.

(R.S. §5152.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5152 derived from act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, §63, 13 Stat. 118, which was the National Bank Act. See section 38 of this title.
### §4750. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Amount

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Fund $50,000,000 to carry out this subchapter.

#### (b) Budgetary treatment

The amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) shall be subject to discretionary spending caps, as provided in section 665 1 of title 2, and therefore shall reduce by an equal amount funds made available for other discretionary spending programs.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title II, §260, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2214.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 665 of title 2, referred to in subsec. (b), was repealed by Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10118(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 695.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §1155. General standards and limitations; preservation of security classification

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Secretary shall respect and preserve the security classification of any scientific or technical information, data, patents, inventions, or discoveries in, or coming into, the possession or control of the Department of Commerce, the classified status of which the President or his designee or designees certify as being essential in the interest of national defense, and nothing in this chapter shall be construed as modifying or limiting any other statute relating to the classification of information for reasons of national defense or security.

(Sept. 9, 1950, ch. 936, §5, 64 Stat. 824.)