alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Gateway Distributors, Ltd., a
Nevada  corporation  (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June
30,  2004,  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Richard  A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 30, 2004.


                                             By /s/  Richard  A.  Bailey
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Richard  A.  Bailey,
                                                Chief  Financial  Officer  of
                                                Gateway  Distributors,  Ltd.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, James Y. Gleasman, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Torvec, Inc.,hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Torvec, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) [Reserved] [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8392 and 34-49313.]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 15, 2007 /s/ James Y. Gleasman     James Y. Gleasman  Chief Executive Officer and  Interim Chief Financial Officer
47
§ 381.11 Exemptions based on religious dietary laws. ( a ) Any person who slaughters, processes, or otherwise handles poultry or poultry products which have been or are to be processed as required by recognized religious dietary laws may apply for exemption from specific provisions of the Act or regulations which are in conflict with such religious dietary laws. Any person desiring such an exemption shall apply in writing to the Meat and Poultry Inspection Program, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250, setting forth the specific provisions of the Act and the regulations from which exemption is sought and setting forth the provisions of the religious dietary laws in support of the requested exemption. In addition, the applicant for such an exemption shall submit a statement from the clerical official having jurisdiction over the enforcement of the religious dietary laws with respect to the poultry or poultry products involved, which identifies the requirements of such laws pertaining to the slaughter of the poultry and the processing or other handling of the poultry products involved, and certifies that such requirements are in conflict with specific provisions of the Act and regulations from which the exemption is sought.
( b ) The Administrator, upon a determination that an exemption should be granted, will grant such exemption to the extent necessary to avoid conflict with the religious requirements while still effectuating the purposes of the Act. He may impose such conditions as to sanitary standards, practices, and procedures in granting such exemption as he deems necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Act. Any person who processes poultry or poultry products under exemption from certain requirements as provided in this section shall be subject to all of the other applicable provisions of the Act and the regulations. Processing plants shall meet the sanitary requirements set forth in this part and unless exempted from inspection under the provisions of this subpart, shall be required to qualify for inspection and operate as official establishments. Slaughtered poultry which is prepared under an exemption authorizing the sale of noneviscerated poultry in commerce shall be individually identified with a label approved by the Administrator which identifies the clerical official under whose supervision the poultry was slaughtered.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Beginning ReadingEarly InterventionElementary EducationInstructional EffectivenessReading AchievementReading DifficultiesReading Instruction

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# C_2007021EN.01000102.xml

| 30.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4442 — Carphone Warehouse/AOL UK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 21/02)

On 7 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4442. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4442. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
### §3907. Use of member's facilities

(a) Motor Boats, Yachts, Aircraft, and Radio Stations.—The Coast Guard may utilize for any purpose incident to carrying out its functions and duties as authorized by the Secretary any motorboat, yacht, aircraft, or radio station placed at its disposition for any of such purposes by any member of the Auxiliary, by any corporation, partnership, or association, or by any State or political subdivision thereof.

(b) Motor Vehicles.—The Coast Guard may utilize to carry out its functions and duties as authorized by the Secretary any motor vehicle (as defined in section 30102 of title 49) placed at its disposition by any member of the Auxiliary, by any corporation, partnership, or association, or by any State or political subdivision thereof, to tow Federal Government property.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 555, §826; Aug. 3, 1950, ch. 536, §35, 64 Stat. 408; Pub. L. 109–241, title II, §208(a), July 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 522; Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXV, §3533(j), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2321; renumbered §3907, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §119(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4236.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §265 (Feb. 19, 1941, ch. 8, title I, §6, 55 Stat. 10; Nov. 23, 1942, ch. 639, §2(1), 56 Stat. 1021; Sept. 30, 1944, ch. 453, §3, 58 Stat. 760).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 826 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "section 30102 of title 49" for "section 154 of title 23, United States Code".

2006—Pub. L. 109–241 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

1950—Act Aug. 3, 1950, struck out comma after "Secretary" and substituted "any" for "and" after "Secretary".
# C_2011319EN.01001703.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2011 — Meica v OHIM — TofuTown.com (TOFUKING)

(Case T-99/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for the Community trade mark TOFUKING - Earlier national word mark King - Earlier national and Community word marks Curry King - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 319/35

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co KG (Edewecht, Germany) (represented by: S. Russlies, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: TofuTown.com GmbH (Wiesbaum, Germany) (represented by: B. Krause and F. Cordt, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 January 2010 (Case R 63/2009-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co KG and TofuTown.com GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment:

Operative part of the judgment:

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 7 January 2010 (Case R 63/2009-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 7 January 2010 (Case R 63/2009-4);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co KG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co KG;

| 3. | Orders TofuTown.com GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders TofuTown.com GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
Building 765, New Workshop and Storage Addition

Estimated Cost

Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

Cornell 6NHP-F16K, 6" diameter food pump. 

Includes a stainless steel vortext tank that is 42" long 

and 34" wide. Motor is 7.5 HP. Pump is capable of 

up to 500 gpm at 55' TDH.

Each 2.0 $16,800.00 $33,600

Subtotal Direct Cost: $33,600

Plumbing 

(piping from pump through-wall discharge piping, 

etc.)

13.3 $4,469

Mechanical systems 

(Supports for pumps, electrical, motors supports, 

etc, etc)

NA $0

Electrical systems 

(wiring, switches, panel box, motor starters, etc.) 15.8 $5,309

Instrumentation 

(PLCs, sensors, hardware, software, etc.) NA $0

Sitework (clearing, grading, surveying) NA $0

Total Direct Cost: $43,378

Engineering 8.0 $3,470

Permits 2.0 $868

Scheduling 0.8 $347

Performance bonds 2.5 $1,084

Insurance

(risk, equipment floater, public liability) 2.3 $998

Contractor markup (handling, procuring, 

subcontracting, change orders, etc.) 10.0 $4,338

Overhead and profit 10.0 $4,338

Total Indirect Cost: $15,442

Total Base Cost: $58,820

% of total direct cost

% of total direct cost

% of total direct cost

% of total direct cost

% of total direct cost

% of total direct cost

% of subtotal direct cost

% of subtotal direct cost

% of subtotal direct cost

% of subtotal direct cost

% of subtotal direct cost

% of total direct cost

Page 1 of 4 December 2002
Building 765, New Workshop and Storage Addition

Estimated Cost

Notes:

1. Pump costs from Alard Equipment Company, Williamson, NY 

2. Cost factors obtained from RSMeans Building Construction Cost Data, 68th Edition, 2010.

Page 2 of 4 December 2002
Building 765, New Workshop and Storage Addition

Estimated Cost

Notes

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

Page 3 of 4 December 2002
Building 765, New Workshop and Storage Addition

Estimated Cost

Page 4 of 4 December 2002
# C_2014421EN.01004601.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/46

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — Moschonaki v Commission

(Case F-55/10 RENV)

((Civil service - Officials - Referral back to the Tribunal after annulment - Recruitment - Vacancy notice internal to the institution - Eligibility conditions in the vacancy notice - Appointing authority’s discretion))

2014/C 421/63

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Chrysanthe Moschonaki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Referral back after annulment — Application to annul the decision refusing to take into consideration the applicant’s candidature for a post as assistant librarian and for an order that the Commission pays her a sum by way of compensation for the material and non-material harm suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 30 September 2009 by which the European Commission rejected Ms Moschonaki’s candidature for the post of ‘[a]ssistant [l]ibrarian/[d]ocumentalist’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 30 September 2009 by which the European Commission rejected Ms Moschonaki’s candidature for the post of ‘[a]ssistant [l]ibrarian/[d]ocumentalist’;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay Ms Moschonaki the sum of EUR 5  000; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay Ms Moschonaki the sum of EUR 5  000;

| 3. | Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Ms Moschonaki in Cases F-55/10, T-476/11 P and F-55/10 RENV. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Ms Moschonaki in Cases F-55/10, T-476/11 P and F-55/10 RENV.

---
II

Calendar No. 193

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1257

To amend statutory damages provisions of title 17, United States Code.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22, 1999

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

JULY 1, 1999

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

A BILL

To amend statutory damages provisions of title 17, United

States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Digital Theft Deter5 rence and Copyright Damages Improvement Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 1257 RS

1 SEC. 2. STATUTORY DAMAGES ENHANCEMENT.

2 Section 504(c) of title 17, United States Code, is

3 amended—

4 (1) in paragraph (1)—

5 (A) by striking ‘‘$500’’ and inserting

6 ‘‘$750’’; and

7 (B) by striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘$30,000’’; and

9 (2) in paragraph (2)—

10 (A) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’;

11 (B) by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting

12 ‘‘$150,000’’;

13 (C) by inserting after the second sentence

14 the following:

15 ‘‘(B) In a case where the copyright owner dem16 onstrates that the infringement was part of a re17 peated pattern or practice of willful infringement,

18 the court may increase the award of statutory dam19 ages to a sum of not more than $250,000 per

20 work.’’; and

21 (D) by striking ‘‘The court shall remit

22 statutory damages’’ and inserting the following:

23 ‘‘(C) The court shall remit statutory damages’’.

Calendar No. 193

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1257

A BILL

To amend statutory damages provisions of title 17,

United States Code

JULY 1, 1999

Reported without amendment
### §5533. Consumer rights to access information

#### (a) In general

Subject to rules prescribed by the Bureau, a covered person shall make available to a consumer, upon request, information in the control or possession of the covered person concerning the consumer financial product or service that the consumer obtained from such covered person, including information relating to any transaction, series of transactions, or to the account including costs, charges and usage data. The information shall be made available in an electronic form usable by consumers.

#### (b) Exceptions

A covered person may not be required by this section to make available to the consumer—

(1) any confidential commercial information, including an algorithm used to derive credit scores or other risk scores or predictors;

(2) any information collected by the covered person for the purpose of preventing fraud or money laundering, or detecting, or making any report regarding other unlawful or potentially unlawful conduct;

(3) any information required to be kept confidential by any other provision of law; or

(4) any information that the covered person cannot retrieve in the ordinary course of its business with respect to that information.

#### (c) No duty to maintain records

Nothing in this section shall be construed to impose any duty on a covered person to maintain or keep any information about a consumer.

#### (d) Standardized formats for data

The Bureau, by rule, shall prescribe standards applicable to covered persons to promote the development and use of standardized formats for information, including through the use of machine readable files, to be made available to consumers under this section.

#### (e) Consultation

The Bureau shall, when prescribing any rule under this section, consult with the Federal banking agencies and the Federal Trade Commission to ensure, to the extent appropriate, that the rules—

(1) impose substantively similar requirements on covered persons;

(2) take into account conditions under which covered persons do business both in the United States and in other countries; and

(3) do not require or promote the use of any particular technology in order to develop systems for compliance.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1033, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2008.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1037 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 5531 of this title.
### §3713. Transfer of title and possession

#### (a) Payment and delivery of deeds

The foreclosure commissioner shall deliver a deed or deeds to the purchaser or purchasers and obtain the balance of the purchase price in accordance with the terms of sale provided in the notice of default and foreclosure sale.

#### (b) Quit claim deed

Subject to subsection (c), the foreclosure deed or deeds shall convey all of the right, title, and interest in the security property covered by the deed which the Secretary as holder, the foreclosure commissioner, the mortgagor, and any other persons claiming by, through, or under them, had on the date of execution of the mortgage, together with all of the right, title, and interest thereafter acquired by any of them in such property up to the hour of sale, and no judicial proceeding shall be required ancillary or supplementary to the procedures provided in this chapter to assure the validity of the conveyance or confirmation of such conveyance.

#### (c) Possession by purchaser; continuing interests

A purchaser at a foreclosure sale held pursuant to this chapter shall be entitled to possession upon passage of title to the mortgaged property, subject to an interest or interests senior to that of the mortgage and subject to the terms of any lease of a residential tenant for the remaining term of the lease or for one year, whichever period is shorter. Any other person remaining in possession after the sale and any residential tenant remaining in possession after the applicable period shall be deemed a tenant at sufferance.

#### (d) Right of redemption; right of possession

There shall be no right of redemption, or right of possession based upon right of redemption, in the mortgagor or others subsequent to a foreclosure pursuant to this chapter.

#### (e) Imposition of tax on conveyance to the Secretary

When conveyance is made to the Secretary, no tax shall be imposed or collected with respect to the foreclosure commissioner's deed, whether as a tax upon the instrument or upon the privilege of conveying or transferring title to the property. Failure to collect or pay a tax of the type and under the circumstances stated in the preceding sentence shall not be grounds for refusing to record such a deed, for failing to recognize such recordation as imparting notice or for denying the enforcement of such a deed and its provisions in any State or Federal court.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title III, §369E, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 430.)