alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
          The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of S1 Corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:
(a)  the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2005 filed on thedate hereof with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b)  information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany.         /s/ Matthew Hale   Matthew Hale   Chief Financial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchangecommission or its staff upon request.
May 9, 2005
EXHIBIT 10.4
                                                                    ------------

                                  BILL OF SALE


         Sale of Secured Convertible Promissory Note
         Issuer:     Small Cap Advisors, Inc.
         Purchaser:  iVoice, Inc.

         Gross Proceeds                                                $77,250

                  Less Funding Fee payable to
                  iVoice, Inc.                                         $ 2,250
                                                                       -------

         Net Proceeds                                                  $75,000
                                                                       =======




Agreed and Acknowledged:


SMALL CAP ADVISORS, INC.                      IVOICE, INC.


By: _______________________                   By: _____________________
     Mark Meller                                   Jerome Mahoney
     President and                                 President and
     Chief Executive Officer                       Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1236 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1236

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for commencement of 
  the construction of the Arrowrock Dam Hydroelectric Project in the 
                            State of Idaho.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 17, 1999

 Mr. Craig (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for commencement of 
  the construction of the Arrowrock Dam Hydroelectric Project in the 
                            State of Idaho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 4656, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section, extend until March 26, 
2005, the time period during which the licensee is required to commence 
construction of the project.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER IV–A—GUARANTEES
# C_2013156EN.01003802.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2013 — Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland v OHIM (CONTINENTAL)

(Case T-383/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark CONTINENTAL - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 156/68

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented: initially by S. Vollmer, and subsequently by U. Rühl, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by S. Schäffner, and subsequently by D. Walicka, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 June 2010 (R 300/2010-1), concerning an application for registration of the word mark CONTINENTAL as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland eV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland eV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
54Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, James Y. Gleasman, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Torvec, Inc.,hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Torvec, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Reserved] [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8392 and 34-49313.]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based upon such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date:  August 16, 2007 S – James Y. Gleasman
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements of CenterPoint Properties Trust on Form S-3 (File
Nos. 33-95792, 33-99858, 333-18235 and 333-49359), Form S-8/S-3 (File Nos.
333-05087 and 333-34687) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-05141 and 333-62887) of
our report dated February 10, 1998, except for Note 2 for which the date is
November 15, 1999, relating to the financial statements, which appears in the
Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated November 15, 1999 relating to the financial statement schedules which
appears in this Form 10-K/A.

                                                  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Chicago, Illinois
December 27, 1999
# C_2011013EN.01004001.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/40

---

Action brought on 24 September 2010 — Adriaens and Others v Commission

(Case F-87/10)

()

2011/C 13/78

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Stéphane Adriaens (Evere, Belgium) and Others (represented by: Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant’s decision, contained in the applicants’ pay slips, to limit their salary adjustment, with effect from July 2009, to an increase of 1,85 % in the context of the annual adjustment of remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants on the basis of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision in so far as it sets the rate of salary adjustment at 1,85 %, applying Regulation No 1296/2009, adjusting with effect from 1 July 2009 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants and the correction coefficients applied thereto; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision in so far as it sets the rate of salary adjustment at 1,85 %, applying Regulation No 1296/2009, adjusting with effect from 1 July 2009 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants and the correction coefficients applied thereto;

| — | Grant to the applicants backdated interest, calculated on the basis of the rate fixed by the European Central Bank, payable on the total sums corresponding to the difference between the salary specified in the pay slips dating from January 2010 and the adjusted pay slips for the period from July to December 2009 and the salary to which they would have been entitled, until the date of the late adjustment of those salaries: |
| --- | --- |

—

Grant to the applicants backdated interest, calculated on the basis of the rate fixed by the European Central Bank, payable on the total sums corresponding to the difference between the salary specified in the pay slips dating from January 2010 and the adjusted pay slips for the period from July to December 2009 and the salary to which they would have been entitled, until the date of the late adjustment of those salaries:

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
king with the

we learned:

1. Can you tell me about other ways I can

learn about the different types ofcommunication options - books, videotapes,films, websites, and courses?

2. What suggestions do you have for supporting my child's use of communication at home (i.e., spoken and/or sign language)? 3. How should I work with my child's team of professionals (such as my child's audiologist and school teachers) to ensure

that all of our efforts are coordinated? 

7. Can I observe a speech therapy session with another child who has hearing loss? 

Questions to help our family

and child at home/school:

After talking with the

SLP, I/we learned:

uestions

Speech-Language Pathologist Questions

4. What other resources do you offer?

Can you suggest any other resourcesin the community for our family? 

Questions about speech and language 

therapy services for my/our child: 
2. ¿Qué recomienda usted para apoyar a mi

hijo en el uso de la comunicación en elhogar (por ejemplo: habla y/o lenguaje porseñas)?

3. ¿Cómo debo trabajar con el equipo de

profesionales que atiende a mi hijo(tales cómo el audiólogo y los profesores deescuela) para asegurar que todos nuestrosesfuerzos estén coordinados? 

4. ¿Qué otros recursos me puede ofrecer?

¿Me puede sugerir otros recursos

disponibles en la comunidad parami familia?

7. ¿Puedo observar una sesión de terapia del 

habla con otro niño con pérdida auditiva?

blar con el patólogo

nguaje, he aprendido:

P reguntas para ayudar a nuestra familia y a nuestro hijo en el hogar o en la escuela:

l lenguaje Preguntas para el patólogo del habla y el lenguaje

Después de hablar con el patólogo

del habla y el lenguaje, he aprendido:

1. ¿Puede decirme de que otra manera puedo

aprender sobre las diferentes opciones decomunicación - libros, videos, peliculas, sitiosweb y cursos? 

Preguntas sobre los servicios de

terapia del habla y el el lenguaje 

para nuestro hijo:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  Joint Task Force Mirconesia		 

Home : Media : Photos

slide show module

Lt. Rachel Lee Performs Preflight Checks

84th Engineer Battalion builds warehouse in Itbayat

Tiger Strike 24: Amphibious Assault

MRF-D 24.3 U.S. Marines, Sailors embark HMAS Adelaide for Wet and Dry Exercise Rehearsal

USS Louisiana Depart Naval Base Guam

USS Ralph Johnson Conducts Replenishment at Sea with USS Ronald Reagan

Tiger Strike 24: Fast-Rope and PZ Operations

BTF flies farther with 909th ARS support

Tiger Strike 24: Amphibious Operations in the South China Sea

JPMRC-X - Air Assault to Jungle Base
404 NOT FOUND
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.119 What must the Secretary do when making a decision on a petition? ( a ) The Secretary must issue a written decision to the Tribe and the petitioner stating the basis for the decision about the Tribe's compliance or noncompliance with the TERA within 30 days following: ( 1 ) A hearing, if the Tribe requested a hearing;
( 2 ) The Tribe's declining the opportunity for a hearing; or
( 3 ) The Tribe's failure to respond to the opportunity for a hearing within 20 days of the Secretary's written notice of the opportunity for a hearing.
( b ) If the Secretary decides that the Tribe is not in compliance with the TERA, the Secretary must: ( 1 ) Include findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to each claim made in the petition in the written decision to the Tribe; and
( 2 ) Take action to ensure compliance with the TERA.
( c ) The Secretary will dismiss any petition if the interested party who filed the petition has agreed with the Tribe to a resolution of the claims presented in the petition.
[73 FR 12821, Mar. 10, 2008, as amended at 84 FR 69613, Dec. 18, 2019]
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton 

SONJA LYNN WILLIAMS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2113-96-2 PER CURIAM 

 DECEMBER 10, 1996 

BURGER KING 

AND 

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Sonja L. Williams, pro se, on brief). 

 (William Orr Smith, on brief), for appellees. 

 Sonja Lynn Williams ("claimant") contends that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission ("commission") erred in finding that she 

failed to prove she sustained disability causally related to her 

March 17, 1987 compensable industrial accident. Upon reviewing 

the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this 

appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the 

commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. 

 On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable 

to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. 

Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). 

Unless we can say as a matter of law that claimant proved 

disability related to the March 17, 1987 accident, the 

commission's findings are binding and conclusive upon us. Tomko 

v. Michael's Plastering Co., 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d 833, 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

835 (1970). 

 Dr. Michael Decker's February 18, 1988 report, stating that 

claimant's costochondritis was unrelated to the burns she 

sustained at work, constituted the only medical evidence before 

the commission. Because no medical evidence established that 

claimant suffered from any disability causally related to her 

compensable accident, we cannot say as a matter of law that 

claimant's evidence sustained her burden of proof. Therefore, we 

affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 9, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127956 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 127956 

 COA: 246882 

Wayne CC: 02-005328-01 

MIGUEL HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows: 

I would remand this case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing regarding 

whether there was probable cause for defendant’s arrest. As it is, the record does not 

reflect facts sufficient to constitute probable cause. 

s1206 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 9, 2005 

Clerk
#### § 381.12 Effect of religious dietary laws exemptions on other persons.

Whenever a slaughterer or processor is granted an exemption under § 381.11 with respect to the slaughtering or processing of any poultry or poultry products under this part, under specified conditions, the sale, offer for sale, transportation and other handling in commerce by any person of such poultry and poultry products in accordance with such conditions is hereby authorized, except as restricted by the Act.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—NATURAL GAS CURTAILMENT POLICIES
###### Editorial Note on Part 113

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

#### §§ 113.456-113.498 [Reserved]
### §§741 to 747. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 741, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §9, 39 Stat. 368; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, covered members' rights to loans. See section 2201 of this title.

Section 742, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §9, 39 Stat. 368; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §102(a), 73 Stat. 384, covered payments for stock from proceeds of member's mortgage loan. See section 2033 of this title.

Section 743, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §9, 39 Stat. 368; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, authorized retention of commissions on interest payments. See section 2033 of this title.

Section 744, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §9, 39 Stat. 368; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, provided for individual liability of shareholders.

Section 744a, acts June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VII, §72, 48 Stat. 271; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, relieved shareholders of land bank associations of personal liability for contracts, debts, and engagements entered into after June 16, 1933.

Section 745, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §9, 39 Stat. 368; June 3, 1935, ch. 164, 20, 49 Stat. 319; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §24, 50 Stat. 710; June 30, 1945, ch. 204, §1(b), 59 Stat. 266; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), (i), 73 Stat. 387, provided for new members for land bank associations. See section 2033 of this title.

Section 746, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §9 (par.) as added Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §25(a), 50 Stat. 710; amended Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, provided for a common board of directors for two or more associations. See section 2032 of this title.

Section 747, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §9 (par.), as added Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §25(a), 50 Stat. 711; amended Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, provided for transfer of powers to a loan committee. See section 2033 of this title.
#### § 146.41 Definitions.

*Meat-type turkey.* A domesticated turkey grown for the primary purpose of producing meat.

*Meat-type turkey slaughter plant.* A meat-type turkey slaughter plant that is federally inspected or under State inspection that the Food Safety Inspection Service has recognized as equivalent to federal inspection.