alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00777-CR

KENNETH COOPER MCAFEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 339th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1262341).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on August 

28, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible 

error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered May 12, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown. Opinion delivered by Justice Keyes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,195
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                       893
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,618
<PP&E>                                         230,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,099
<BONDS>                                        153,976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           44,460
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,736)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,799
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,896
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,367
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,367
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
### §2708. Clothing for officers and enlisted personnel

(a) The Coast Guard may purchase uniforms, accouterments, and related equipment for sale to officer personnel and cadets of the Coast Guard.

(b) The Coast Guard may purchase uniform clothing for sale to enlisted personnel of the Coast Guard. The actual cost of the clothing thus sold to enlisted personnel may be withheld from their pay.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 534, §485; Aug. 3, 1950, ch. 536, §33, 64 Stat. 408; Pub. L. 87–649, §14d(4), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 502; renumbered §2708, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Subsection (a) is based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §30 (Jan. 12, 1919, ch. 8, 40 Stat. 1054). Said section was changed to have application to the Coast Guard at all times, rather than when the Coast Guard is operating with the Navy.

Inasmuch as the act cited above applies equally to the Navy and Marine Corps as well as the Coast Guard, it is not scheduled for repeal but is being amended by section 9 of this act to eliminate reference to the Coast Guard.

Subsection (b) is based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946, ed., §13, and on title 33, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §754 (July 1, 1898, ch. 346, §1, 30 Stat. 604; July 27, 1912, ch. 255, §2, 37 Stat. 239). Said section 13 was changed to have application to all enlisted personnel rather than to "crews of vessels in service" only. The provision of said section 754 which provided for the sale of clothing to civilian employees is eliminated as becoming obsolete.

Subsection (c) is new. Title 37, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §110 authorizes the payment of a cash allowance in case clothing is not furnished to enlisted persons of the Coast Guard. Clearly this presumes the authority to issue clothing to enlisted persons; this section makes the authority statutory. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 485 of this title as this section.

1962—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 87–649 repealed subsec. (c) which permitted the Coast Guard to purchase uniform clothing for distribution to enlisted personnel or to pay such enlisted personnel a cash clothing allowance.

1950—Subsec. (c). Act Aug. 3, 1950, struck out "to" after "or".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1962 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 87–649 effective Nov. 1, 1962, see section 15 of Pub. L. 87–649, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services.
# C_2011232EN.01004201.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/42

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Lebedef v Commission

(Case F-33/10) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Appraisal for the year 2005 - Career development report - General provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Report drawn up following the judgment in Case F-36/07 - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2011/C 232/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the applicant’s career development report for the period from 1 January 2005 till 31 December 2005, as drawn up following its annulment by the Civil Service Tribunal in its judgment in Case F-36/07.

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal

| 1. | Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Mr Lebedef to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Lebedef to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010, p. 53.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      175
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                       2112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3289
<PP&E>                                            3889
<DEPRECIATION>                                     542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              968
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4252
<OTHER-SE>                                         439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6802
<SALES>                                          18424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 18424
<CGS>                                             9625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  8133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  80
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    586
<INCOME-TAX>                                       223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                363
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       363
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
Stakeholder Announcement

USDA Seeks Applicants to Improve Water and Wastewater Infrastructure in Rural Areas 

Eligible Applicants are Encouraged to Apply Now 

(Dec. 3, 2015) – USDA Under Secretary for Rural Development Lisa Mensah today announced 

that the Rural Development Agency is soliciting applications for the Water and Waste Disposal 

Loan and Grant program. USDA will publish on its website the amount of funding available for 

FY 2016. In the meantime, eligible applicants are encouraged to apply now by using the online 

application tool RDApply.

Applications may be submitted by most state and local governmental entities, private non-profits, 

and federally-recognized tribes who are unable to obtain commercial credit. 

The Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program provides loans and grants for clean and 

reliable drinking water systems, sanitary sewage disposal, sanitary solid waste disposal, and 

storm water drainage to households and businesses in rural areas with a population of 10,000 or 

less. In some cases, funding may also be available for related activities such as legal and 

engineering fees, land acquisition, water and land rights, permits and equipment and other 

activities necessary to complete a project.

Additional information is available by contacting a Water and Environmental Programs

specialist in a USDA Rural Development area office. 

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Office of 

the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 

20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-free Customer Service), (800) 877-8339 (Local or Federal relay), (866) 

377-8642 (Relay voice users).
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.805

## Section §107.805: Approval of cylinder and pressure receptacle requalifiers

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.805 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
#### Morris Koblenzer, Respondent, v. New York City Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Find a Trusteed Pension Plan 
-  DELPHI RETIREMENT PROGRAM FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# DELPHI RETIREMENT PROGRAM FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES

## Overview

## DELPHI RETIREMENT PROGRAM FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES

    View PBGC Maximum Monthly Guarantees for Plans Terminating in 2009
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six month
period ending January 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/ Lawrence Tierney
     --------------------
     Lawrence Tierney
     Principal Financial Officer
     March 14, 2006
Protect Yourself

from Fraud

If the USDA Servicing Office

calls you, we WILL:

Provide you with account-specific 

information to confirm our identity. 

Once our identity is confirmed, a 

USDA loan counselor may ask you 

to share payment information. 

The USDA Servicing Office

will NOT:

Contact you by text, or ask you to 

make payments using gift cards, 

debit or credit cards, Venmo, Zelle, 

CASHAPP, or other peer-to-peer 

(P2P) payment systems.

If you think you’ve received fraudulent communication 

regarding your mortgage, call the USDA Servicing Office

fraud line at 888-796-0537

Don’t fall victim to scammers 

pretending to represent USDA

USDA borrowers are getting fake calls, texts, and emails 

from scammers pretending to work for the USDA Servicing 

Office. These scammers try to pressure customers into 

giving them money or personal information. 

Scam callers can fake or “spoof” the caller identification 

(ID) on your phone, making it seem the call is legitimate. 

A USDA caller ID number appearing on your phone does 

NOT mean the person calling you is actually a USDA

employee. If you are not sure the call is legitimate, hang up, 

and then contact the USDA Customer Servicing Office at 

800-414-1226; (TTY) 800-438-1832.

DO NOT share your credit or debit card number, bank information, or Social 

Security number. Get the person’s name, phone number and caller ID, and note 

what actions they requested of you. Then, report the call to the fraud line.

Phone 

calls

Text 

messages

USDA will NOT contact you by text. DO NOT respond to the text or click on any 

links. Report the text to the fraud line. 

Emails DO NOT click any links or respond to the email without first contacting the fraud line. 

Suspicious 

letters

DO NOT go to any websites or call any phone numbers in the letter. 

Report the letter to the fraud line. 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

If You Suspect Fraud:
# C_2010161EN.01003701.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/37

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 22 April 2010 — Paderborner Brauerei Haus Cramer KG v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld

(Case C-196/10)

(2010/C 161/56)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Paderborner Brauerei Haus Cramer KG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bielefeld

Question referred

Is the Combined Nomenclature, in the version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001 of 6 August 2001 (1) and in the version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1832/2002 of 1 August 2002, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that a product described as a ‘malt beer base’ with an alcoholic strength by volume of approximately 14 %, obtained from brewed beer which has been clarified and then subjected to ultrafiltration, by which the concentration of ingredients such as bitter substances and proteins has been reduced, is to be classified under heading 2208?

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001 of 6 August 2001, amending Annex I to Council

Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, OJ 2001 L 279, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1832/2002 of 1 August 2002, amending Annex I to Council

Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, OJ 2002 L 290, p. 1.

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of James Domanico, Respondent, v Woodmere Fire District et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 921]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 4, 2005, denying the employer’s request for reimbursement of wages paid to claimant during his period of disability.

“ ‘It is fundamental that reimbursement pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 (4) (a) is conditioned upon the employer making a request therefor prior to the time the award of compensation is made’ ” *(Matter of Bailey v Verizon,*30 AD3d 778, 779 [2006], quoting *Matter of Iamiceli v American Tel. & Tel.,*189 AD2d 1040, 1040 [1993]). In a June 24, 2004 notice that payment of compensation had been stopped or modified, the self-insured employer added that the total compensation benefits due claimant were to be reimbursed to claimant’s employer, the Woodmere Fire District. We find that the June 24, 2004 notice with the added language regarding reimbursement to claimant’s employer is sufficient to constitute a request for reimbursement pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 (4) (a) *(see Matter of Tatem v Shild Co. Assoc.,*93 AD2d 964, 964 [1983]; *Matter of Velji v Rural Farms Workers Opportunity,*93 AD2d 936, 937 [1983]; *Matter of Caliguire v Lansingburgh Cent. School Dist.,*81 AD2d 713, 713 [1981], *lv denied*54 NY2d 605 [1981]).

However, it is unclear from our review of the record whether the June 24, 2004 notice was filed prior to the award of compensation made at the January 7, 2005 hearing and, therefore, timely *(see Matter of Iamiceli v American Tel. & Tel., supra*at 1041). Accordingly, this matter is remitted to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings.

Crew III, J.E, Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ, concur. Ordered that the decision is reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
121 STAT. 66 PUBLIC LAW 110–11—MAR. 7, 2007

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 577:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Feb. 5, considered and passed House.

Feb. 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 110–11

110th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3903 South

Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Henry Ybarra III Post

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT HENRY YBARRA III POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 3903 South Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Henry Ybarra

III Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Sergeant Henry Ybarra III Post Office Building’’.

Approved March 7, 2007.

Mar. 7, 2007

[H.R. 577]