alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# From: Laney, Michael N.

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:40 AM

To: 'Garnett, Nancy'

Cc: 'Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov'

Subject: THC conversion

Attachments: Conversion of TXI CEMS data.xls

Nancy,

Here are the daily averages of the THC data you submitted showing the conversion to dry THC at

7%O2.

Michael Laney

Environmental Engineering

Environmental Health & Safety Division

RTI International

TEL: 919

‐ 316

‐ 3413

FAX: 919

‐ 316

‐ 3420

EMAIL: mnl@rti.orgTHC CEMS Data 6/1/2007 6/2/2007 6/3/2007 6/4/2007 6/5/2007 6/6/2007 6/7/2007 6/8/2007 6/9/2007 6/10/2007 6/11/2007 6/12/2007 6/13/2007 6/14/2007 6/15/2007 6/16/2007 6/17/2007 6/18/2007 6/19/2007 6/20/2007 6/21/2007 6/22/2007 6/23/2007 6/24/2007 6/25/2007 6/26/2007 6/27/2007 6/28/2007 6/29/2007 6/30/2007 7/1/2007 7/2/2007 7/3/2007 7/4/2007 7/5/2007 Mean SDEV

TXI Midlothian

Kiln 5 THC wet ppm 1.6 1.2 1.1 3.1 1.8 1.8 3.6 4.7 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.2 3.2 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.0 0.8 1.4 2.3 1.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 0.9 1.7 5.2 4.5 2.5 2.4 2.3

TXI Midlothian

Kiln 5 Dry O2 % 12.9 15.2 15.9 12.4 12.6 12.6 12.3 12.2 12.8 12.9 12.8 12.9 12.9 12.4 12.2 13.1 13.1 12.8 12.4 17.0 12.3 13.3 12.4 12.4 13.1 7.1 13.4 11.5 6.6 14.2 12.4 12.8 13.1 12.3 12.5

TXI Midlothian

Kiln 5 Wet O2 % 10.3 13.1 13.8 9.5 9.8 9.8 9.6 9.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.1 10.1 9.5 9.2 9.8 10.1 10.2 9.7 14.8 9.4 10.6 9.7 9.8 10.5 5.6 10.9 9.3 5.2 12.0 9.6 10.1 10.4 9.5 9.8

TXI Midlothian

Kiln 5 CF moisture 1.25 1.16 1.15 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.29 1.29 1.28 1.29 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.30 1.32 1.33 1.30 1.26 1.28 1.15 1.31 1.26 1.28 1.27 1.24 1.27 1.23 1.24 1.27 1.19 1.29 1.27 1.26 1.30 1.27

TXI Midlothian

Kiln 5 CF 7% O2 1.74 2.44 2.77 1.63 1.68 1.68 1.62 1.61 1.71 1.74 1.72 1.74 1.74 1.64 1.60 1.78 1.79 1.72 1.64 3.54 1.61 1.83 1.64 1.63 1.77 1.01 1.86 1.47 0.98 2.07 1.64 1.72 1.79 1.62 1.65

TXI Midlothian

Kiln 5 THC dry at 7% O2 ppm 3.6 3.4 3.4 6.7 4.0 4.0 7.5 9.7 2.6 2.4 2.6 3.4 2.7 2.8 2.5 7.6 1.8 1.1 1.4 2.4 2.2 1.9 2.9 4.8 4.1 1.1 2.3 2.2 1.1 4.2 10.9 9.9 5.5 5.0 4.7 3.96 2.54
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Certifies Open Prairie Rural Opportunities Fund as Newest Rural Business Investment 

Company

WASHINGTON, Jan. 25, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced the certification of a new Rural Business Investment Company (RBIC), the Open Prairie Rural 

Opportunities Fund, L.P., under USDA’s Rural Business Investment Program (RBIP).

Open Prairie is the third non-leveraged fund to be certified under RBIP. The program provides licenses to 

private capital funds to assist in meeting the capital needs in rural areas.

The Open Prairie Rural Opportunities Fund will invest in companies with high-growth potential in the food and

agribusiness sectors, including those in crop protection, agricultural production and processing, precision 

agriculture, and information and data management. Fund managers expect to begin investing up to $100 million 

in private equity into rural America during the first half of 2018.

Open Prairie, founded in 1997, is based in Effingham, Ill. It has managed fund products ranging from 

technology-based venture capital to farmland portfolios. It has consistently focused on facilitating capital 

accessibility in underserved markets.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
# C_2007095EN.01003801.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 March 2007 — Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission

(Case T-110/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Career development report - Assessment period 2001/2002 - Action for annulment - Statement of reasons - Evaluation of merits - Evidence - Action for damages)

(2007/C 95/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Paulo Sequeira Wandschneider (Brussels, Belgium) (originally represented by G. Vandersanden and A. Finchelstein, and then by G. Vandersanden and C. Ronzi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, an application for annulment of the decision of 23 April 2003 containing the applicant's career development report for the period 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002 and, second, an application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 23 April 2003 containing the applicant's career development report for the period 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 23 April 2003 containing the applicant's career development report for the period 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002;

| 2. | Rejects the action for damages; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Rejects the action for damages;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004.

1

---
#### § 124.41 Notice of hearing.

No later than ten days before the hearing, APHIS will notify the requesting party, the applicant, the petitioner, and any other interested person of the date, time, and location of the hearing.
### §345. Rediscount of notes, drafts, and bills for member banks; limitation of amount

The aggregate of notes, drafts, and bills upon which any person, copartnership, association, or corporation is liable as maker, acceptor, indorser, drawer, or guarantor, rediscounted for any member bank, shall at no time exceed the amount for which such person, copartnership, association, or corporation may lawfully become liable to a national banking association under the terms of section 84 of this title: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed to change the character or class of paper now eligible for rediscount by Federal reserve banks.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §13 (par.), 38 Stat. 264; Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 93, 38 Stat. 958; Sept. 7, 1916, ch. 461, 39 Stat. 752; Apr. 12, 1930, ch. 140, 46 Stat. 162.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the fifth par. of section 13 of act Dec. 23, 1913, as amended. The fifth par. constituted the third par. of section 13 in 1916 (39 Stat. 752), became the fourth par. in 1923 (42 Stat. 1478), and became the fifth par. in 1932 (47 Stat. 715). For further details, see Codification notes set out under sections 343 and 344 of this title. For classification to this title of other pars. of section 13, see Codification note set out under section 342 of this title.

#### Amendments

1930—Act Apr. 12, 1930, among other changes, inserted proviso.
# C_2007096EN.01003601.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/36

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 16 March 2007 — V v Parliament

(Case T-345/05 R)

(Application for interim measures - Waiver of the immunity of a Member of the European Parliament - Application for suspension of operation - Application for other interim measures - Admissibility - Urgency)

(2007/C 96/74)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: V. (Binsted, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Lofthouse, Barrister, M. Monan, C. Hayes, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by H. Krück, D. Moore and M. Windisch, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

APPLICATION, firstly, for suspension of the operation of the Resolution of the European Parliament [confidential information omitted] to waive the applicant's immunity from suit, secondly, for interim measures to prevent criminal proceedings being resumed pending final judgment of the Court of First Instance in the main action, thirdly, for an order that the applicant's anonymity be protected and that there be no publicity in respect of the present application pending the ruling of the Court of First Instance on the main application and the conclusion of any trial before the national court, fourthly, for a direction that the applicant be granted permission to disclose the parties' written pleadings in the interlocutory proceedings and in the main action to the prosecuting authority in the United Kingdom and to the national court hearing the domestic case and, fifthly, for an order that the hearing of the main application be expedited so as to take place as soon as possible.

confidential information omitted

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
#### § 319.261 Meat loaf.

“Meat Loaf” is a cooked meat food product in loaf form made from comminuted meat. Mechanically Separated (Species) may be used in accordance with § 319.6. To facilitate chopping or mixing, water or ice may be used in an amount not to exceed 3 percent of the total ingredients used.

[35 FR 15597, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 43 FR 26425, June 20, 1978; 47 FR 28257, June 29, 1982]
From: Karen Hays [Karen.Hays@dnr.state.ga.us] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 2:00 PM To: Adams, Lucy H. Subject: Fwd: Attached Image Attachments: Attached Image

Here's the information we discussed. If you want additional information concerning these tests, you may wish to contact Ross Winne, Manager, Industrial Source Monitoring Program at 404-363-7141.

Karen Hays, P.E. Manager, Stationary Source Compliance Program Air Protection Branch Georgia Environmental Protection Division 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 Atlanta, GA 30354 Phone (404) 363-7115 Fax (404) 363-7100

Page 1
#### § 354.126 Carcasses held for further examination.

Each carcass, including all parts thereof, in which there is any lesion of disease or other condition, which might render such carcass or any part thereof unfit for human food, and with respect to which a final decision cannot be made on first examination by the inspector, shall be held for further examination. The identity of each such carcass, including all parts thereof, shall be maintained until a final examination has been completed.
#### § 381.100 Official detention tag.

The detention tag prescribed in § 381.211 is an official device.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of LiquidGolf Holding
Corporation (the Company), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dwain Brannon, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Dwain Brannon                    
|Dwain Brannon                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|Dated: May 14, 2004                  



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LiquidGolf Holding Corporation and will be retained by LiquidGolf Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 10490 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. G E R A R D O G U Z M A N -A R M E N D A R IZ , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 5: 08- C R
- 83- 1 B ef ore K IN G , JO L L Y , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * The Fed e r alPubli c D e fe nde ra ppo i nt e d t o r e pr e s e nt G e r ar do G uz m anA rm en da ri z ha s m ovedf or l eave to w i t h draw a n d h as fil ed a bri ef i n accor da n ce w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . G u zm an - A rm en da ri z ha s f i l ed a re s p o n s e . T h e re c o r dis in s u ffic ie n tlyd e v e lo p e dto a llo w co n s id e r a tio n a t t h is t i m e of G u zm an - A rm en da ri z’ s c l ai m s of i n ef fect ive assi st an ce of

coun sel ; such cl ai m s general l y “ can n otbe res olvedon d i recta pp ealw h en [t h ey h ave] n otbeen rai sed bef

ore t h e di st ri ctcourtsi n ce no opp ort u n i t y exi st ed to dev el op t h e rec ord United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 10490

2 on the m erits of t h e a l l eg a ti on s. ” Un ited S ta tes v . Ca n tw ell , 470 F. 3d 1087, 1091 ( 5t h Ci r . 2 00 6) (i nt e r nalq uo t at i o n m ar ks a nd ci t ati o n o m i t t e d) . Our in d e p e n d e n tr e v ie w o f t h e r e c o r d , c o u n s e l’s b r ie f, a n d G u z m a n -A r m e n d a r iz ’s r e s p o n s e d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , c o u n s e l’s m ot i on f

or l eave to w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r e s p o n s ib ilitie s h e r e in , a n dth e A P P E A L I S D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hersha Hospitality Trust (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay H. Shah, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 August 5, 2010
/s/ Jay H. ShahJay H. ShahChief Executive Officer
### Fw: VOC RACTApplicability SIP prehearingwith rerquestfor parallel processing Sara Waterson 

### ta Jane Spann 

### 0712312012 08:52 AM ;iisloi y This message has been replied to. 

### 5 attachments



# - - prehearing submission with request for parallel processing.7.19.2012.pdf Admin~and~Tech~Support_checklist.pdf 

# T

- 

# - 20120719Notice-VOC-Applicability.pdf20120719 AmendmentVOC ApplicabilityThresholds.pdf 

# T

- 20120719 Synopsis

## - VOC Applicability.pdf

Jane, Here's the email from Jimmy we were talking about last week.

Sara Waterson US EPA Region 4 Regulatory Development Section Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-8960

(404) 562-9061 (office) (404) 562-9095 (fax) Waterson.Sara@epa.gov

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and delete the copy you received.

-----Forwarded by Sara Waterson/R4/USEPA/US on 07/23/2012 08:51AM -----

....................... ....................... To: Lynorae 

### Benjamin/R4/USEPA/US@EPAI ScottR Davis/R4/USEPA/US@EPA, Sara 

### Waterson/R4/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Jimmy Johnston" <Jimmy.Johnston@dnr.state.ga.us> Date: 07/22/2012 05:14PM Cc: "James Capp" <James.Capp@dnr.state.ga.us>, "James Kelly" <James.Kelly@dnr.state.ga.us>, "Lynne Collier" 

### <Lynne.Collier@dnr.state.ga.us>

Subject: VOC RACT Applicability SIP prehearing with rerquest for parallel processing
Attached is an exact copy of the documents that are to be submitted by hard-copy. The hard copy submission and CD will follow via mail.

James 

### P. Johnston, P.E. Program Manager

### Planning & 

### Support Program Air Protection Branch Georgia Environmental Protection Division phone: 

### 404/363-7014 

### fax: 404/363-7100
### §1358. Consent of Congress for interstate compacts; reservation of right to alter, amend, or repeal

(a) The consent of the Congress is given to any two or more States to enter into agreement or compacts, not in conflict with any law of the United States, for cooperative efforts and mutual assistance and in designating agencies, under section 1357 of this title, for accomplishing the purposes of this chapter.

(b) The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section, or consent granted by this section, is expressly reserved.

(Pub. L. 89–182, §8, Sept. 14, 1965, 79 Stat. 682.)
#### § 351.15 Reports of violations.

Inspectors shall report to the circuit supervisor any apparent violations of the regulations in this part or the Federal Meat Inspection Act or regulations thereunder (subchapter A of this chapter) which occur at certified plants, or elsewhere, within their knowledge. The circuit supervisor shall report such actions to the Administrator through appropriate channels.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18** **U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350)**




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
      of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of FTS Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
      certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
      Quarterly Report, as amended, for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Form
      10-QSB/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
      in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Scott
      Gallagher


-------------------------


Scott
      Gallagher


Chief
      Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Accounting Officer)


April
      30,
      2007
#### Sardis S. Lawrence, use, etc. *v.*Darius Johnson *et al.*

Principal and *agent—effect of contract by agent in excess of Ms authority on the rights of his principal.*Where a person is employed merely as an agent to collect a promissory note, he can not, without the consent of his principal, make a contract with the principal maker of the note to extend the time of payment, and thus discharge the sureties on the note of their liability.

Appear from the Circuit Court of Livingston county; the Hon. L. E. Payson, Judge, presiding.

*352This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Sardis S. Lawrence, for the use of Mary A. Bedell, against William Oleary,. Darius Johnson, Adolph Brucker and Henry Greénebaum, on a promissory note executed by the defendants. Cleary was not served with process. The other defendants appeared and pleaded that they signed the note as sureties for Cleary, and that one Lucius Winston, then being the holder of the note, extended the time of payment of the same without their consent. To this plea the plaintiff replied that Winston was not the holder of the note, and that he had no authority to extend the time of payment.

A trial by the court, the jury being waived, resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendants/to reverse which the record is brought by the plaintiff to this court.

Mr. 1ST. J. Pillsbury, for the appellant.

Messrs. Strawn & Wolgamott, for the appellees.

Per Curiam :

In this case, Winston being merely an agent to collect the note, had no power to extend the time of payment, and thus discharge the sureties, without the consent of his principal. *Nolan*v. *Jackson,*16 Ill. 274.

We are also of opinion that the defendants did not prove a contract to extend the time of payment, except one of a conditional .character. Even if Winston had had authority, he made no binding contract.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Marc Beuls, the Chief Executive Officer of Millicom International Cellular S.A., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Millicom International Cellular S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
May 2, 2005

| |  | By: |  | /s/MARC BEULS
| |  | --- |  | -------------
| |  |     |  | Name:        
| |  |     |  | Title:       

Exh 12.1-1

---



QuickLinks
### §§2611 to 2613. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2103(h), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–401

Section 2611, Pub. L. 93–533, §13, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1730, related to establishment of land parcel recordation system on demonstration basis.

Section 2612, Pub. L. 93–533, §14, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1730, directed Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to report on necessity for further legislation involving real estate settlements.

Section 2613, Pub. L. 93–533, §15, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1730, directed Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to determine, and report to Congress on, feasibility of including statements of settlement costs in special information booklets.
### SUBCHAPTER II—OPERATION AND DATA MARKETING OF LANDSAT SYSTEM