alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                 [LETTERHEAD]


                                 May 12, 1976

Vancouver Associates
Post Office Box 40
Long Beach, California 90801
Attention: Harry Newman, Jr.

                             Re: Vancouver Mall
                                 Vancouver, Washington

Gentlemen:

This letter, when signed and returned by you will serve to amend in the 
manner set forth below, as of May 11, 1976, that certain Joint Venture 
Agreement for Vancouver Mall dated September 28, 1975 by and between May 
Centers, Inc. and Vancouver Mall Associates:

      Section 11.5 (B) (1) is hereby deleted and a new Section 11.5 (B) (1) 
      is added as follows:

      "If Operating Cash Flow, as hereinafter defined in Section 11.9, is in 
       excess of Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000), eighty percent (80%)
       of such Operating Cash Flow up to and including Four Hundred Thousand 
       Dollars ($400,000) plus sixty percent (60%) of such Operating Cash Flow 
       in excess of Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000) shall be so paid 
       to Managing Partner and the balance of the Operating Cash Flow shall be 
       distributed to the Partners in accordance with the percentages set forth 
       in Section 11.3 hereof; and"


Except as modified herein the Joint Venture Agreement shall continue in full 
force and effect in accordance with its terms.

                                 MAY CENTERS, INC.

ATTEST:


 /s/ Authorized Officer          By  /s/ Authorized Officer
---------------------------         ---------------------------
     Secretary                           Vice President

                                 VANCOUVER ASSOCIATES,
                                 a limited partnership


                                 By  /s/ Harry Newman, Jr.
                                   -------------------------------
                                       Harry Newman, Jr.


                                              and


                                       /s/ Leroy Brettin
                                -----------------------------------
                                          Leroy Brettin

                                 Its General Partners
APPENDIX B
null

1.4383398
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 26, 2011

t0919 

# Order

September 26, 2011

143246

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143246 COA: 300987 Kalamazoo CC: 2002-000828-FC JOSEPH KANEM WHITE, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 21, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 166.11 Suspension and revocation of licenses. ( a ) *Suspension or revocation after notice.* In addition to the imposition of civil penalties and the issuance of cease and desist orders under the Act, the license of any facility may be suspended or revoked for any violation of the Act or the regulations in this part. Before such action is taken, the licensee of the facility will be informed in writing of the reasons for the proposed action and, upon request, shall be afforded an opportunity for a hearing with respect to the merits or validity of such action, in accordance with rules of practice which shall be adopted for the proceeding.
( b ) *Summary suspension.* If the Administrator has reason to believe that any licensee has not complied or is not complying with any provisions of the Act or regulations in this part and the Administrator deems such action necessary in order to protect the public health, interest, or safety, the Administrator may summarily suspend the license of such persons pending a final determination in formal proceedings and any judicial review thereof, effective upon verbal or written notice of such suspension and the reasons therefor. In the event of verbal notification, written confirmation shall follow as soon as circumstances permit. This summary suspension shall continue in effect pending the completion of the proceeding and any judicial review thereof, unless otherwise ordered by the Administrator.
( c ) The license of a person shall be automatically revoked, without action of the Administrator, upon the final effective date of the second criminal conviction of such person, as is stated in section 5(c) of the Act. The licensee will be notified in writing of such revocation by the Area Veterinarian in Charge or, in States having primary enforcement responsibility, by the State animal health official.
( d ) Any person whose license has been suspended or revoked for any reason shall not be licensed in such person's own name or in any other manner, nor shall any of such person's employees be licensed for the purpose of operating the facility owned or operated by said licensee while the order of suspension or revocation is in effect. Any person whose license has been revoked shall not be eligible to apply for a new license for a period of 1 year from the effective date of such revocation. Any person who desires the reinstatement of a license that has been revoked must follow the procedure for new licensees set forth in § 166.10 of this part.
[47 FR 49945, Nov. 3, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 4890, Feb. 18, 1987; 56 FR 26899, June 12, 1991]
CONFORMED COPY

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Millicom International Cellular, S.A. a company incorporated under the laws of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
March 5, 2010

By:

/s/ MIKAEL GRAHNE Name: Mikael Grahne
Title:Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
# C_2010134EN.01002701.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/27 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Leuven (Belgium) lodged on 15 March 2010 — 1. Olivier Paul Louis Halley, 2. Julie Jacqueline Marthe Marie Halley and 3. Marie Joëlle Armel Halley v Belgische Staat

(Case C-132/10)

2010/C 134/41

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Leuven

Parties to the main proceedings

| Applicants | : | Olivier Paul Louis HALLEY Julie Jacqueline Marthe Marie HALLEY Marie Joëlle Armel HALLEY | | Olivier Paul Louis HALLEY | | Julie Jacqueline Marthe Marie HALLEY | | Marie Joëlle Armel HALLEY |
| ---------- | ------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ------------------------- | | ------------------------------------ | | ------------------------- |
| | Olivier Paul Louis HALLEY | | | | | | | |
| | Julie Jacqueline Marthe Marie HALLEY | | | | | | | |
| | Marie Joëlle Armel HALLEY | | | | | | | |
| Defendant | : | Belgische Staat | | | | | | |

Question referred

Is point 2 of the first paragraph of Article 137 of the Inheritance Tax Code (Wetboek Successierechten), in conjunction with Article 111 of the Inheritance Tax Code, compatible with Articles 26, 49, 63 and 65 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, given that the limitation period in respect of inheritance tax payable on registered shares is two years where the company’s centre of effective management is in Belgium, but 10 years where the company’s centre of effective management is not in Belgium?

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001062679
<NAME>                        Lexon, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         98,803
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,020,663
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,387,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          471,972
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7,763
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,292,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   915,619
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,017,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,028,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,028,753)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.29)



</TABLE>
### §2776. Payments at time of discharge for good of service

Enlisted members discharged by dishonorable discharge, bad-conduct discharge, or any other discharge for the good of the service, may, upon discharge, be paid a sum not to exceed $25. The sum paid shall be fixed by and in the discretion of the Commandant, and shall be paid only in cases where the individual so discharged would otherwise be without funds to meet his immediate needs.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 533, §481; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(C), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; renumbered §2776, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(44), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4750.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Derived from title 34, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §197, and title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §3a (Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 536, §10, 43 Stat. 1274; Oct. 26, 1942, ch. 623, 56 Stat. 987).

Said section 197 was made applicable to the Coast Guard by title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §3a whenever the Coast Guard is operating with the Navy. Experience has shown the advantage of having such a provision applicable to the Coast Guard at all times.

Said section would in no way be affected. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "individual" for "person".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 481 of this title as this section.

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted "Enlisted members" for "Enlisted men".
§ 11.3 Demand for payment. ( a ) *Notice requirements.* Generally, before DHS starts the collection actions described in this subpart, DHS sends a written notice to the debtor under 31 CFR 901.2. The notice provided under this section includes notice of any and all actions DHS may take to offset the debt, including any notices required under 31 CFR parts 285, 900-904.
( b ) *Exceptions to notice requirements.* DHS may omit from any notice to a debtor any provision that is not legally required given the collection remedies to be applied to a particular debt.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

# DATE AND TIME: 

                        The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on March 10, 2011,                               ( print page 12357)                            from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

## Open Session

### A. Approval of Minutes

    - February 10, 2011.

### B. Reports

    - Frequently Asked Questions on Borrowers Rights—Part II.
    - Update on Dodd-Frank Rulemaking Projects.

Dated: March 2, 2011.

Dale L. Aultman,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-5233 Filed 3-3-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
# C_2006310EN.01000402.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 26 September 2006 — Codirex Expeditie BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-400/06)

(2006/C 310/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Codirex Expeditie BV

Appellant:

Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Respondent:

Questions referred

| 1. | Must subheading 0202 30 50 of the Combined Nomenclature (CN) be interpreted as meaning that frozen (boned) meat derived from the part of the forequarter of the bovine animal referred to in Additional Note 1.A.(h)(11) to Chapter 2 of the CN may qualify for classification under that subheading only if the cut of meat in question is a connected cut? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must subheading 0202 30 50 of the Combined Nomenclature (CN) be interpreted as meaning that frozen (boned) meat derived from the part of the forequarter of the bovine animal referred to in Additional Note 1.A.(h)(11) to Chapter 2 of the CN may qualify for classification under that subheading only if the cut of meat in question is a connected cut?

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 means that meat in loose portions may also qualify for classification under subheading 0202 30 50, is it sufficient for classification under that subheading that it has been established that the imported consignment of meat consists of cuts of frozen meat all of which are derived from the part of the forequarter referred to in Additional Note 1.A.(h)(11) to Chapter 2 of the CN, or must that consignment of meat, as a whole, or the individual constituent parts thereof (cartons) also satisfy other criteria or have other additional characteristics? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 means that meat in loose portions may also qualify for classification under subheading 0202 30 50, is it sufficient for classification under that subheading that it has been established that the imported consignment of meat consists of cuts of frozen meat all of which are derived from the part of the forequarter referred to in Additional Note 1.A.(h)(11) to Chapter 2 of the CN, or must that consignment of meat, as a whole, or the individual constituent parts thereof (cartons) also satisfy other criteria or have other additional characteristics?

---
# C_2010246EN.01003301.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/33

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 12 July 2010 — Nordea Pankki Suomi Oyj

(Case C-350/10)

()

2010/C 246/55

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nordea Pankki Suomi Oyj

Applicant

Question referred

Question referred

Must points 3 and 5 of Article 13B(d) of the Sixth VAT Directive 77/388/EEC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the swift services described in section 1 of this order used in payment transactions and securities transaction settlements between financial institutions are exempt from value added tax?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment

1

17 May 1977

---
Posta

Com

Meeting No

August 22, 2

Washingto

States Pos

interest con

The sessio

entity with 

of major in

the Commi

during thes

The Postal Regul

transparency and

Presidentially-app

addition to Chairm

al Reg

missi

otice 

2014 

Postal 

on, DC – R

stal Service

ncerning th

ons are limit

the operatio

itiatives wit

ission are n

se sessions

latory Commission

d accountability of

pointed and Sena

man Goldway, the

gulato

on 

Regulator

Representat

met on Jun

e operation

ted to the s

ons of the o

hin each or

not discusse

s. 

n is an independe

f the Postal Servic

te-confirmed Com

e other Commissio

ory 

ry Commis

Informat

ives of the 

ne 24th and

ns of both o

sharing of in

other organ

rganization

ed, nor do d

ent federal agency

ce and foster a vita

mmissioners, each

oners are Vice Ch

ssion/Unite

tional Sess

Postal Reg

d again on 

organization

nformation f

nization. Th

. Pending 

deliberation

y that provides reg

al and efficient un

h serving terms of

hairman Mark Acto

ed States P

sions 

gulatory Co

August 20t

ns. 

for the purp

his may inc

(or anticipa

ns or decisi

gulatory oversight

niversal mail syste

f six years. The C

on and Robert Ta

Pos

9

W

Postal Serv

ommission a

th to share 

pose of fam

clude report

ated) postal

ional discus

t over the U.S. Po

em. The Commiss

Chairman is design

ub.

stal Regulatory Co

901 New York Ave

Washington, DC 20

ww

vice 

and the Uni

information

miliarizing ea

ting on the 

l matters be

ssions take

ostal Service to en

sion is comprised

nated by the Pres

ommission 

enue, NW 

Suite 200 

0268-0001

ww.prc.gov

ited 

n of 

ach 

status 

efore 

e place, 

nsure the 

d of five 

sident. In
#### § 3.133 Separation.

Animals housed in the same primary enclosure must be compatible. Animals shall not be housed near animals that interfere with their health or cause them discomfort.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Multinational Team Prepares for Pacific Endeavor

By Staff Sgt. Chris Hubenthal

                HONOLULU, Hawaii  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News and Articles