alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Active IQ Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
W. Brimmer the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and
for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                     ACTIVE IQ TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



Dated: March 28, 2003                 By /s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer
                                         ----------------------
                                         Kenneth W. Brimmer
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER I—EXPORT TRADING COMPANIES AND TRADE ASSOCIATIONS
### §2306. Voluntary retirement after twenty years' service

Any enlisted member who has completed twenty years' service may, upon his own application, in the discretion of the Commandant, be retired from active service.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 521, §355; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(A), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; Pub. L. 99–348, title II, §205(b)(8), July 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 700; renumbered §2306, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §113(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4221.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §185a (May 24, 1939, ch. 146, §2, 53 Stat. 755).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 355 of this title as this section.

1986—Pub. L. 99–348 struck out ", with retired pay of the grade or rating with which retired" after "active service".

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to enlisted member for reference to enlisted man.
# C_2010161EN.01003602.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/36

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 19 April 2010 — Rastelli Davide et C. v Jean-Charles Hidoux, in his capacity as liquidator appointed by the court for Médiasucre International

(Case C-191/10)

(2010/C 161/55)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de Cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rastelli Davide et C.

Defendant: Jean-Charles Hidoux, in his capacity as liquidator appointed by the court for Médiasucre International

Questions referred

| 1. | Where a court in a Member State opens the main insolvency proceedings in respect of a debtor, on the view that the centre of the debtor’s main interests is situated in the territory of that Member State, does Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings (1) preclude the application, by that court, of a rule of national law conferring upon it jurisdiction to join to those proceedings a company whose seat is in another Member State solely on the basis of a finding that the property of the debtor and the property of that company have been intermixed? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where a court in a Member State opens the main insolvency proceedings in respect of a debtor, on the view that the centre of the debtor’s main interests is situated in the territory of that Member State, does Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings (1) preclude the application, by that court, of a rule of national law conferring upon it jurisdiction to join to those proceedings a company whose seat is in another Member State solely on the basis of a finding that the property of the debtor and the property of that company have been intermixed?

| 2. | If the action for joinder falls to be categorised as the opening of new insolvency proceedings in respect of which the jurisdiction of the court of the Member State first seised is conditional on proof that the company to be joined has the centre of its main interests in that Member State, can such proof be inferred solely from the finding that the property of the two companies has been intermixed? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the action for joinder falls to be categorised as the opening of new insolvency proceedings in respect of which the jurisdiction of the court of the Member State first seised is conditional on proof that the company to be joined has the centre of its main interests in that Member State, can such proof be inferred solely from the finding that the property of the two companies has been intermixed?

---

(1)  OJ L 160, p. 1.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2019

No. 04-19-00409-CV

Frederick-Omoyuma SILVER,

Appellant

v.

TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING TEXAS INC., ET AL.,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CI-05365

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 17, 2019, appellant filed a notice of appeal. On June 26, 2019, appellant filed an 

affidavit of inability to pay costs; however, attached to appellant’s docketing statement, faxed to 

this court on June 20, 2019, is an order on ability to afford costs signed by the trial court on June 

5, 2019. In the order, the trial court finds appellant is able to afford the costs of court. 

Accordingly, appellant is required to pay the costs associated with this appeal.

The fee for filing appeals in this court is $205.00. Our records do not reflect payment of 

the $205.00 fee. Appellant is ORDERED to pay the filing fee no later than two weeks from the 

date of this order. If appellant fails to pay the filing fee within the time provided, this appeal will 

be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c) 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of July, 2019.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Makes $7.5 Million in Technical Assistance and Training Grants Available for Disaster 

Recovery

 WASHINGTON, Feb. 20, 2020 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Donald “DJ” LaVoy today announced that USDA is making $7.5 million in grants available 

through the Community Facilities Technical Assistance and Training Grant Program to help rural communities 

continue their recovery from the devastating effects of hurricanes, fires, tornadoes, floods and other natural 

disasters.

 The $7.5 million is included in the Additional Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief Act that 

President Trump signed into law on June 6, 2019. The grants may be used for relief in areas affected by 

Hurricanes Michael and Florence, wildfires in 2018, tornadoes and floods in 2019, and other natural disasters.

 Eligible projects must be in a rural area of 20,000 or less where the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA) has provided a notice declaring a Major Disaster Declaration and assigned a FEMA disaster recovery 

(DR) number. USDA does not provide funding directly to individuals under this program.

 Electronic applications must be submitted to grants.gov by April 30, 2020, at midnight Eastern Standard 

Time. Paper applications must be submitted to the applicant’s nearest USDA office by May 5, 2020, by 4:00 

p.m. local time. 

 Applicants may request technical assistance or other guidance from USDA, as long as requests are made prior 

to April 27, 2020. Additional information is available on page 9726 of the Feb. 20, 2020, Federal Register.

 USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve the 

quality of life in rural America. Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results 

in helping rural communities build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in 

infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Key strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life 

USDA encourages applications for projects located in rural Opportunity Zones. Localities qualify as 

Opportunity Zones if they have been nominated for that designation by the state and that nomination has been 

certified by the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury via his delegation of authority to the Internal Revenue Service.

 USDA also encourages applications that will support the Administration’s goal to combat substance use 

disorder, including opioid misuse, in high-risk rural communities by strengthening the capacity to address 

prevention, treatment and/or recovery.
# 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
#### § 416.11 General rules.

Each official establishment shall develop, implement, and maintain written standard operating procedures for sanitation (Sanitation SOP's) in accordance with the requirements of this part.
### §1715z–4. Modifications in terms of mortgages covering multifamily projects; requests for extensions to cure defaults or for modification of mortgage terms; regulations

The Secretary shall not consent to any request for an extension of the time for curing a default under any mortgage covering multifamily housing, as defined in the regulations of the Secretary, or for a modification of the terms of such mortgage, except in conformity with regulations prescribed by the Secretary in accordance with the provisions of this section. Such regulations shall require, as a condition to the granting of any such request, that, during the period of such extension or modification, any part of the rents or other funds derived by the mortgagor from the property covered by the mortgage which is not required to meet actual and necessary expenses arising in connection with the operation of such property, including amortization charges under the mortgage, be held in trust by the mortgagor and distributed only with the consent of the Secretary; except that the Secretary may provide for the granting of consent to any request for an extension of the time for curing a default under any mortgage covering multifamily housing, or for a modification of the term of such mortgage, without regard to the foregoing requirement, in any case or class of cases in which an exemption from such requirement does not (as determined by the Secretary) jeopardize the interests of the United States.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title II, §239, as added Pub. L. 90–448, title III, §302, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 506; amended Pub. L. 100–242, title IV, §416(c), Feb. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1908.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–242 struck out "insured" before "mortgages" in section catchline, and struck out subsec. (a) designation and subsec. (b) which related to violations and penalties imposed for violations of the provisions of former subsec. (a).
# C_2011362EN.01002303.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/23

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — AZ v Commission

(Case F-26/10) (1)

1

(Civil service - Promotion - 2009 promotion exercise - Ability to work in a third language - Existence of a disciplinary procedure - Exclusion from the promotion exercise)

2011/C 362/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AZ (Thionville, France) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission (represented by: D. Martin and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to exclude the applicant from the 2009 promotion exercise and order that the Commission pay to him a sum of compensation for non-material damage.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders AZ to pay the entirety of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders AZ to pay the entirety of the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010, p. 58.

1

---
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1307

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to permit participating households

to use food stamp benefits to purchase nutritional supplements providing

vitamins or minerals, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30, 1999

Mr. HARKIN (for himself, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. MCCONNELL) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to permit participating households to use food stamp benefits to purchase

nutritional supplements providing vitamins or minerals,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Stamp Vitamin

5 and Mineral Improvement Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress finds that—
2

•S 1307 IS

1 (1) the dietary patterns of Americans do not re2 sult in nutrient intakes that fully meet recommended

3 dietary allowances of vitamins and minerals;

4 (2) children in low-income families and the el5 derly often fail to achieve adequate nutrient intakes

6 from diet alone;

7 (3) pregnant women have particularly high nu8 trient needs, which they often fail to meet through

9 diet alone;

10 (4)(A) scientific studies show that nutritional

11 supplements that contain folic acid (a B vitamin)

12 can prevent as many as 60 to 80 percent of neural

13 tube birth defects;

14 (B) the Public Health Service, in September

15 1992, recommended that all women of childbearing

16 age who are capable of becoming pregnant should

17 consume at least 0.4 of a milligram of folic acid per

18 day for the purpose of reducing the risk of having

19 a pregnancy affected with spina bifida or other neu20 ral tube birth defects; and

21 (C) the Food and Drug Administration has ap22 proved a health claim for folic acid to reduce the

23 risk of neural tube birth defects;
3

•S 1307 IS

1 (5) infants who do not receive adequate intakes

2 of iron may be somewhat impaired in mental and be3 havioral development; and

4 (6) scientific evidence indicates that increasing

5 intake of specific nutrients over an extended period

6 of time protects against diseases or conditions such

7 as osteoporosis, cataracts, cancer, and heart disease.

8 SEC. 3. USE OF FOOD STAMPS TO PURCHASE VITAMINS

9 AND MINERALS.

10 Section 3(g)(1) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7

11 U.S.C. 2012(g)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘or food prod12 uct’’ and inserting ‘‘, food product, or nutritional supple13 ment providing a vitamin or mineral’’.

Æ
RUS Form 675 (Rev. 1-2023) 

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY 

This form is used to indicate the company officers and/or manager authorized to sign the 

certification on RUS Form 481 for telecommunications borrowers or RUS Form 595 for 

electric borrowers. At the time such authorization is being made:

 Telecommunications borrowers - A certified copy of the resolution of the board of 

directors and one copy of RUS Form 675, Certificate of Authority, shall be 

submitted to RUS. 

 Electric borrowers– One copy of the RUS Form 675, Certificate of Authority, shall 

be submitted to RUS. 

This form must be completed as follows: 

Fld Name / 

Item No. 

Instruction 

Borrower's 

Name 

Enter the complete legal name of the company. 

Borrower's 

Address 

Enter the company address including the street, city, state, and zip code. 

Date Select the date from the drop down menu. 

RUS 

Form 481 

Checkbox 

Check this box if your company is a telecommunications borrower. This 

signifies that your company has a loan, grant, or loan/grant combination 

administered by the RUS Telecommunications Program. 

RUS 

Form 595 

Checkbox 

Check this box if your company is an electric borrower. This signifies 

that your company has a loan, grant, or loan/grant combination 

administered by the RUS Electric Program. 

Title Enter the title of the person that is being authorized to sign the RUS 

Form indicated above. 

Name 

(Type or 

Print) 

Insert the name of the person that is being authorized to sign the RUS 

form. 

Signature Have the person being authorized to sign the RUS Form 675, sign on 

this line. 

Borrower's 

Name 

Enter the organization's name. 

Signature of 

President 

The president of the organization needs to sign on this blank. 

Signature of 

Secretary

The Secretary of the organization needs to sign on this blank 

Date Select the date from the drop down menu. 
The form 675 can be submitted to the respective programs as follows: 

For Telecommunications Borrowers, 

The awardee submits the form electronically with the closing documents for the award. If 

changes are necessary after closing, the awardee works with the General Field Representative 

(GFR) on revising the form and then submits it along with the next Form 481 requesting funds. 

For Electric Program Borrower: 

A hard copy can be mailed to Rural Utilities Service 

 STOP 1560, Rm 4121-S 

 1400 Independence Ave., SW 

 Washington, DC 20250-1560 or 

The form can be signed and scanned then emailed to : RUSElectric@usda.gov with a copy to 

your GFR.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic DiscourseComputer Mediated CommunicationComputer NetworksComputer Uses in EducationElectronic TextHigher EducationOnline Systems

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
To the Board of Directors of Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion about Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc.'s compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc.'s compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with the standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc.'s compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc.'s compliance with minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc. complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
Atlanta, Georgia
February 22, 2002
Exhibit 21

 

Foamex International Inc.

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

as of December 31, 2006

 

|   | **State or Other Jurisdiction** |
|--------|---------------------------------|

| **Subsidiaries** | **of Incorporation** |
|------------------|----------------------|

 

| FMXI, LLC. | Delaware |
|------------|----------|

| Foamex Asia, Inc. | Delaware |
|-------------------|----------|

| Foamex Canada Inc. | Canada |
|--------------------|--------|

| Foamex Carpet Cushion LLC | Delaware |
|---------------------------|----------|

| Foamex de Acuna, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico |
|-------------------------------|--------|

| Foamex de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico |
|--------------------------------|--------|

| Foamex de Cuautitlan, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico |
|------------------------------------|--------|

| Foamex de Juarez, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico |
|--------------------------------|--------|

| Foamex Latin America, Inc. | Delaware |
|----------------------------|----------|

| Foamex L.P. | Delaware |
|-------------|----------|

| Foamex Mexico, Inc. | Delaware |
|---------------------|----------|

| Grupo Foamex de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico |
|--------------------------------------|--------|

| JPSGP Inc. | Delaware |
|------------|----------|

| Servicios Administrativos Foamex, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|

| Maquila Foamex, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico |
|------------------------------|--------|

| Corte y Costura Foamex, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico |
|--------------------------------------|--------|

| Administration Foamex, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
#### Edward C. Martin, Appellant, v. Valhalla Realty and Improvement Company, Respondent.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Woodward, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


EXHIBIT 99.1  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT OF KPMG LLP ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT
              SCHEDULE

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Clarus Corporation:

     Under date of February 6, 2001, we reported on the consolidated balance
sheet of Clarus Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2000 as
contained in the Clarus Corporation 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In
connection with our audit of the aforementioned consolidated financial
statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement
schedule as listed in the accompanying index. This financial statement schedule
is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audit.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 6, 2001

                                      68
#### § 354.92 Reports of violation.

Each inspector shall report, in the manner prescribed by the Administrator, all violations of and noncompliance with the Act and the regulations in this part of which he has knowledge.