alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-51068

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TAMMY JO MCLAIN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-183-2

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Tammy Jo McLain has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

McLain has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-51068 Document: 00512751157 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
No. 13-51068

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-51068 Document: 00512751157 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
### §302. Joint cases

(a) A joint case under a chapter of this title is commenced by the filing with the bankruptcy court of a single petition under such chapter by an individual that may be a debtor under such chapter and such individual's spouse. The commencement of a joint case under a chapter of this title constitutes an order for relief under such chapter.

(b) After the commencement of a joint case, the court shall determine the extent, if any, to which the debtors' estates shall be consolidated.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2558.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

A joint case is a voluntary bankruptcy case concerning a wife and husband. Under current law, there is no explicit provision for joint cases. Very often, however, in the consumer debtor context, a husband and wife are jointly liable on their debts, and jointly hold most of their property. A joint case will facilitate consolidation of their estates, to the benefit of both the debtors and their creditors, because the cost of administration will be reduced, and there will be only one filing fee.

Section 302 specifies that a joint case is commenced by the filing of a petition under an appropriate chapter by an individual and that individual's spouse. Thus, one spouse cannot take the other into bankruptcy without the other's knowledge or consent. The filing of the petition constitutes an order for relief under the chapter selected.

Subsection (b) requires the court to determine the extent, if any, to which the estates of the two debtors will be consolidated; that is, assets and liabilities combined in a single pool to pay creditors. Factors that will be relevant in the court's determination include the extent of jointly held property and the amount of jointly-owned debts. The section, of course, is not license to consolidate in order to avoid other provisions of the title to the detriment of either the debtors or their creditors. It is designed mainly for ease of administration.
### **CHAPTER 29—COAST GUARD FAMILY SUPPORT, CHILD CARE, AND HOUSING**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—COAST GUARD FAMILIES

Sec.
2901.
Work-life policies and programs.
2902.
Surveys of Coast Guard families.
2903.
Reimbursement for adoption expenses.
2904.
Education and training opportunities for Coast Guard spouses.
2905.
Youth sponsorship initiatives.
2906.
Dependent school children.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—COAST GUARD CHILD CARE

2921.
Definitions.
2922.
Child development services.
2923.
Child development center standards and inspections.
2924.
Child development center employees.
2925.
Parent partnerships with child development centers.
2926.
Family child care providers.
2927.
Child care subsidy program.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—HOUSING

2941.
Definitions.
2942.
General authority.
2943.
Leasing and hiring of quarters; rental of inadequate housing.
2944.
Retired service members and dependents serving on advisory committees.
2945.
Conveyance of real property.
2946.
Coast Guard Housing Fund.
2947.
Reports.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior analysis for chapter 29 "REPORTS" consisted of items 2901 "Transmission of annual Coast Guard authorization request", 2902 "Capital investment plan", 2903 "Major acquisitions", 2904 "Manpower requirements plan", 2905 "Annual performance report", and 2906 "Major acquisition program risk assessment", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §117(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4229.

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXIV, §11401(c)(1)(B), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4108, added item 2927.

**2021**—Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXII [LXXXII], §8237(b)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4665, which directed amendment of the analysis for this chapter by adding item 2926 "at the end", was executed by adding the item after item 2925, which item was at the end of the items for subchapter II of this chapter, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §117(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4230, inserted chapter 29 designation and heading and added items 2901 to 2947.
#### § 700.275 Requests for access to records.

The Privacy Act permits an individual, upon his request, to gain access to his record or to any information pertaining to him which is contained in a system and to review the record and have a copy made of all or any portion thereof in a form comprehensive to him, 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1). A request for access shall be submitted in accordance with the procedures in this subpart.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stephen Atkinson, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 688]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated February 15, 2005, which, without a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the evidence submitted by the People established, by clear and convincing evidence *(see*Correction Law § 168-k [2]), including reliable hearsay *(id.),*the existence of facts sufficient to support the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that the defendant be classified as a level three sex offender *(see People v Hegazy,*25 AD3d 675 [2006]; *People v Terdeman,*175 Misc 2d 379 [1997]). Santucci, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
ex_10-3.htm


    
      
        

        

      

      Exhibit
10.3

       

       

      

      
        
          
          

        

        
          1

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

         

         

      


    2
§ 9.15 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 9.1(a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or an extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, *professional and technical services* shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting of a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( c ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( d ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
6/t. PJJ~PJJ~ ~~ rpj)~o/P!JuMc Off/~ 

David E. Peralta 

Parish President . 

1125 E. St. Bernard Highway 

Phone (504) 278-4300 

January 30, 2013 

u.s. Dept. of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

400 7th St. SW, Room PL-4090 

Washington, DC 20591-0001 

Dear Sir: 

Chalmette, Louisiana 70043 

Fax (504) 278-4480 

This letter is to request to extend Exemption No. 10161 

Regulatory No. FAA-2005-20297, dated May 16, 2011, which will 

expire May 31, 2013, for St. Bernard Mosquito Control, St. 

Bernard Parish Government, 8201 West Judge Perez Drive, 

c:~:f.7~ 

A~;~~ ; •. Blake 

Agent of Service 

St. Bernard Parish Mosquito Control
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of LiquidGolf Holding Corporation (the Company), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allan Woodlief, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    ALLAN
WOODLIEF                 
|Allan Woodlief Chief Financial Officer



Dated: August 10, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
LiquidGolf Holding Corporation and will be retained by LiquidGolf Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010346EN.01003402.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/34

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Venafro (Italy) lodged on 15 October 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Aldo Patriciello

(Case C-496/10)

()

2010/C 346/58

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Venafro

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Aldo Patriciello

Question referred

Question referred

Do the facts construed in abstracto as a criminal offence committed by Aldo Patriciello (a Member of the European Parliament, described in the indictment and in favour of whom the European Parliament adopted a decision on 5 May 2009 to defend immunity), categorised as insulting behaviour under Article 594 of the Penal Code, correspond to the expression of an opinion in the performance of parliamentary duties for the purposes of Article 9 of the Protocol?

---
§ 100.139 Unreimbursed payment for transportation and subsistence expenses. ( a ) *Transportation expenses.* Any unreimbursed payment for transportation expenses incurred by any individual on behalf of any candidate or political committee of a political party is not an expenditure to the extent that: ( 1 ) The aggregate value of the payments made by such individual on behalf of a candidate does not exceed $1,000 with respect to a single election; and
( 2 ) On behalf of all political committees of each political party does not exceed $2,000 in a calendar year.
( b ) *Subsistence expenses.* Any unreimbursed payment from a volunteer's personal funds for usual and normal subsistence expenses incident to volunteer activity is not an expenditure.
### §132. Controlling law; effect on other agencies

To the extent that the provisions of this subchapter or subchapter IV of this chapter conflict with any other provision of this title or other law, pertaining to the Secretary of the Department of Commerce, the provisions of this title shall control; but nothing in this title shall be deemed to revoke or impair the authority of any other Federal agency with respect to the collection or release of information.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1019.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., §123 (June 19, 1948, ch. 502, §3, 62 Stat. 479).

Section was derived from all of section 123 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., except the first sentence. That sentence is incorporated with other provisions in chapter 1 of this title. See Distribution Table.

The reference "Secretary or Department of Commerce" was substituted for reference to the Bureau of the Census to conform with 1950 Reorganization Plan No. 5, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263. See Revision Note to section 4 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.
### SUBCHAPTER I—BUMPER STANDARDS
EXHIBIT 21

AFFYMETRIX, INC.  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Affymetrix,
UK Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in the United Kingdom and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
France S.A.S., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in France and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
GmbH, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Germany and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
Japan K.K., a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Japan and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
Pte Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Singapore and doing business under such name.

Genetic
MicroSystems, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Massachusetts and doing business under such name.

Neomorphic, Inc.,
wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in California and doing business under such name.

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT
      32.2 – CFO Certification**




**SATELLITE
      NEWSPAPERS CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Newspapers Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy
      Hibma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.
      1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.




By:
      /s/ Randy Hibma


Randy
      Hibma


Chief
      Financial Officer






May
      21,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Satellite Newspapers Corp., and will be retained by Satellite
      Newspapers Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:             |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|November 21, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
### **CHAPTER 118—SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY**

Sec.
9301.
National coordinating entity for sustainable chemistry.
9302.
Strategic plan for sustainable chemistry.
9303.
Agency activities in support of sustainable chemistry.
9304.
Partnerships in sustainable chemistry.
9305.
Prioritization.
9306.
Rule of construction.
# CA2006317EN.01000601.xml

| 23.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 317/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 317/6

---

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/10/05

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/10/05

ASSISTANTS (AST 3) IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

ASSISTANTS (AST 3) IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

(Romanian language)

(2006/C 317 A/04)

| Chairman: | Per HØJ |
| --- | --- |
| Alternate chairman: | Caspar CURDT-CHRISTIANSEN |
| Full members: | Sandrine GUILLET |
| | Corina CIOCARLIE-MERSCH |

Chairman:

Per HØJ

Alternate chairman:

Caspar CURDT-CHRISTIANSEN

Full members:

Sandrine GUILLET

Corina CIOCARLIE-MERSCH

---
### Part A—Small Business Investment Companies
§ 113.5 Restrictions on use of campaign funds for flights on noncommercial aircraft (52 U.S.C. 30114(c)). ( a ) *Presidential, vice-presidential and Senate candidates.* Notwithstanding any other provision of the Act or Commission regulations, a presidential, vice-presidential, or Senate candidate, and any authorized committee of such candidate, shall not make any expenditure for travel on an aircraft unless the flight is: ( 1 ) Commercial travel as provided in 11 CFR 100.93(a)(3)(iv);
( 2 ) Noncommercial travel as provided in 11 CFR 100.93(a)(3)(v), and the pro rata share per campaign traveler of the normal and usual charter fare or rental charge for travel on a comparable aircraft of comparable size, as provided in 11 CFR 100.93(c), is paid by the candidate, the authorized committee, or other political committee on whose behalf the travel is conducted, to the owner, lessee, or other person who provides the aircraft within seven calendar days after the date the flight began, except as provided in 11 CFR 100.93(b)(3); or
( 3 ) Provided by the Federal government or by a State or local government.
( b ) *House candidates and their leadership PACs.* Notwithstanding any other provision of the Act or Commission regulations, a candidate for the office of Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress, and any authorized committee or leadership PAC of such candidate, shall not make any expenditures, or receive any in-kind contribution, for travel on an aircraft unless the flight is: ( 1 ) Commercial travel as provided in 11 CFR 100.93(a)(3)(iv); or
( 2 ) Provided by the Federal government or by a State or local government.
( c ) *Exception for aircraft owned or leased by candidates and immediate family members of candidates.* ( 1 ) Paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not apply to flights on aircraft owned or leased by the candidate, or by an immediate family member of the candidate, provided that the candidate does not use the aircraft more than the candidate's or immediate family member's proportional share of ownership, as defined by 11 CFR 100.93(g)(3), allows.
( 2 ) A candidate, or an immediate family member of the candidate, will be considered to own or lease an aircraft under the conditions described in 11 CFR 100.93(g)(2).
( 3 ) An “immediate family member” is defined in 11 CFR 100.93(g)(4).
( d ) *In-kind contribution.* Except as provided in 11 CFR 100.79, the unreimbursed value of transportation provided to any campaign traveler is an in-kind contribution from the service provider to the candidate or political committee on whose behalf, or with whom, the campaign traveler traveled. Such contributions are subject to the reporting requirements, limitations and prohibitions of the Act.
[74 FR 63967, Dec. 7, 2009, as amended at 79 FR 77849, Dec. 29, 2014]