alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Leothis West, 

Plaintiff, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

FILED 

SEP 26 2011 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 11 l 'G~ 

Rosie Rios, 

Defendant. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and 

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis 

application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading 

requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires 

complaints to contain "(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction 

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.'· 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 355 

F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair 

notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate 

defense and detennine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). In pleading fraud or mistake, "a party must state with 

particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake." Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b). 
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues an individual with a District of Columbia 

address for fraud. He seeks $100,000 in damages. Compl. at 2. As with plaintiff s previously 

dismissed cases against Ms. Rios, no facts are stated in support of the claim. See West v. Rios, 

No. 10-cv-2337 (UNA) (D.D.C. Dec. 30,2010), aff'd, No. 11-5003 (D.C. Cir. June 21, 2011) 

(dismissing case without prejudice); West v. Rios, No. 10-cv-2098 (UNA) (D.D.C. Dec. 10, 

2010) (same ).1 Plaintiff has yet to cure the pleading deficiency, and the sparse allegations 

"constitute the sort of patently insubstantial claims" that deprive the Court of subject matter 

jurisdiction. Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see Caldwell v. 

Kagan, 777 F. Supp.2d 177, 178 (D.D.C. 2011) ("A district court lacks subject matter 

jurisdiction when the complaint 'is patently insubstantial, presenting no federal question suitable 

for decision.' ") (quoting Tooley, 586 F.3d at 1009). Therefore, the Court will dismiss the instant 

complaint with prejudice. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

Date: September 1, ~011 

1 In each action, plaintiff lists the defendant's address as 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

Washington, D.C., which is the address of the Department of the Treasury. The Court surmises 

that plaintiff is suing U.S. Treasurer Rosa Gumataotao Rios. 

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FNU JOKO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72174

Agency No. A088-125-412

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 14, 2015** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Joko, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal,

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is

FILED

OCT 21 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 
governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s

factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We

deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The IJ determined Joko’s past experiences of harm were not on account of

his Chinese ethnicity or did not rise to the level of persecution, and the BIA

affirmed the IJ’s conclusion. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s

determination. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009)

(the REAL ID Act “requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’

for an asylum applicant’s persecution”); Halim v. Holder, 590 F.3d 971, 975-76

(9th Cir. 2009) (incidents of mistreatment, cumulatively, did not compel a finding

of persecution). We reject Joko’s contentions that the agency applied an incorrect

legal standard or misinterpreted the record. Substantial evidence also supports the

BIA’s conclusion that even under a disfavored group analysis, Joko did not

demonstrate sufficient individualized risk of persecution to establish eligibility for

asylum. See Halim, 590 F.3d at 979. Thus, Joko’s asylum claim fails.

Because Joko failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed

to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453

F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

2 13-72174
Finally, we lack jurisdiction to consider Joko’s contentions challenging the

IJ’s denial of his CAT claim because he failed to raise them to the BIA, see Barron

v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004), and the record does not support

Joko’s contention that the BIA reached the merits of his CAT claim. 

We deny as unnecessary Joko’s motion to assign his case to a merits panel.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 13-72174
### §2738. Distinguished flying cross

The President may present, but not in the name of Congress, a distinguished flying cross of appropriate design, with accompanying ribbon, to any individual who, while serving in any capacity with the Coast Guard, displays heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in an aerial flight.

(Added Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §12(a), 70A Stat. 624, §492a; renumbered §492b, Pub. L. 111–281, title II, §224(b)(1), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2922; renumbered §2738, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §§8505(a)(31), 8506(e), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4749, 4752.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "individual" for "person" and "displays" for "distinguishes himself by".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 492b of this title as this section.

2010—Pub. L. 111–281 renumbered section 492a of this title as this section.
### §4246. Awards of costs and fees to prevailing plaintiff

When the United States, through private counsel retained under this subchapter, prevails in any civil action, the court, in its discretion, may allow the United States reasonable attorney's fees and other expenses of litigation as part of the costs.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2593, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4906.)
# 6/t.**PJJ~PJJ~ ~~** **rpj)~o/P!JuMc Off/~** 

DavidE. Peralta Parish President

. 1125 E. St. BernardHighway Phone (504) 278-4300

January 30, 2013 

## u.s. Dept. of Transportation Docket Management System 400 7th St. SW, Room PL-4090 Washington, DC 20591-0001 Dear Sir: Chalmette, Louisiana 70043 Fax (504) 278-4480

This letter is to request to extend Exemption No. 10161 Regulatory No. FAA-2005-20297, dated May 16, 2011, which will expire May 31, 2013, for St. Bernard Mosquito Control, St. Bernard Parish Government, 8201 West Judge Perez Drive,

# c:~:f.7~**A~;~~** ; •. Blake Agent of Service St. Bernard Parish Mosquito Control
#### William Fuhrer, Respondent, v. The Yorkville Hungarian Social and Benevolent Association of New York, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court. • affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred. . ' c.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,812
<PP&E>                                      13,864,309
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,306,508)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,906,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,590,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,316,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,906,884
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,620,771
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,623,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             272,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (275,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (275,254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (275,254)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 319.2 Products and nitrates and nitrites.

Any product, such as frankfurters and corned beef, for which there is a standard in this part and to which nitrate or nitrite is permitted or required to be added, may be prepared without nitrate or nitrite and labeled with such standard name when immediately preceded with the term “Uncured” in the same size and style of lettering as the rest of such standard name: *Provided,* That the product is found by the Administrator to be similar in size, flavor, consistency, and general appearance to such product as commonly prepared with nitrate and nitrite: *And provided further,* That labeling for such product complies with the provisions of § 317.17(c) of this subchapter.

[44 FR 48961, Aug. 21, 1979]
### §5496b. GAO study of financial regulations

#### (a) Study

Not later than the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study of financial services regulations, including activities of the Bureau. Such study shall include an analysis of—

(1) the impact of regulation on the financial marketplace, including the effects on the safety and soundness of regulated entities, cost and availability of credit, savings realized by consumers, reductions in consumer paperwork burden, changes in personal and small business bankruptcy filings, and costs of compliance with rules, including whether relevant Federal agencies are applying sound cost-benefit analysis in promulgating rules;

(2) efforts to avoid duplicative or conflicting rulemakings, including an evaluation of the consultative process under subparagraphs (B) and (C) of section 5512(b)(2) of this title, information requests, and examinations; and

(3) other matters related to the operations of financial services regulations deemed by the Comptroller General to be appropriate.

#### (b) Report

Not later than the end of the 30-day period following the completion of a study conducted pursuant to subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall issue a report to the Congress containing a detailed description of all findings and conclusions made by the Comptroller General in carrying out such study, together with such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Comptroller General may determine to be appropriate.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1016B, as added Pub. L. 112–10, div. B, title V, §1573(a), Apr. 15, 2011, 125 Stat. 138.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this Act, referred to in subsec. (a), probably means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 112–10, which enacted this section and was approved Apr. 15, 2011.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Gateway Distributors, Ltd., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2004,  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Richard A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 20, 2004.

                                    By  /s/  Richard A. Bailey
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Richard A. Bailey,
                                      Chief Executive Officer of
                                      Gateway Distributors, Ltd.


<PAGE>
### SUBCHAPTER I—DRINKING WATER
### [§677. Renumbered §12309]
#### § 311.14 Abrasions, bruises, abscesses, pus, etc.

All slight, well-limited abrasions on the tongue and inner surface of the lips and mouth, when without lymph node involvement, shall be carefully excised, leaving only sound, normal tissue, which may be passed for human food. Any organ or other part of a carcass which is badly bruised or which is affected by an abscess, or a suppurating sore shall be condemned; and when the lesions are of such character or extent as to affect the whole carcass, the whole carcass shall be condemned. Portions of carcasses which are contaminated by pus or other diseased material shall be condemned.
§ 103.42 How long must a lender comply with Program requirements? ( a ) A lender must comply in general with Program requirements during: ( 1 ) The effective period of its loan guaranty agreement or loan insurance agreement; and
( 2 ) Whatever additional period is necessary to resolve any outstanding loan guaranty or insurance claims or coverage the lender may have.
( b ) Except as otherwise required by law, a lender must maintain records with respect to a particular loan for 6 years after either: ( 1 ) The loan is repaid in full; or
( 2 ) The lender accepts payment from BIA for a loss on the loan, pursuant to a guaranty certificate or an insurance agreement.
( c ) At any time 2 years or more following one of the events specified in paragraphs (b)(1) or (2) of this section, a lender may convert its records for corresponding loans to any electronic format that is readily retrievable and that provides an accurate, detailed image of the original records. Upon converting its records in this manner, the lender may dispose of its original loan records.
( d ) This section does not restrict any claims BIA may have against the lender or any other party arising from the lender's participation in the Program.
For:                  B+H Ocean Carriers Ltd.





From:               Navinvest Marine Services (USA) Inc.


The Sail Loft


19 Burnside Street


Bristol, RI  02809








FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE








NEW YORK, NEW YORK    September 22, 2011....B+H Ocean Carriers Ltd. (NYSE AMEX:  BHO), providing instruction for how to obtain hard copy of the Company’s annual reports.





The Company filed its annual report form 20F in July 11th, 2011; the Form 20F is available on the Company’s website, www.bhocean.com.  All shareholders who wish to receive a free hard copy of the Company annual report 20F please write to:





Deborah Davis


C/O  B + H Ocean Carriers Ltd.


3rd Floor, Par La Ville Place


14 Par La Ville Road


Hamilton HM 08, Bermuda








Safe Harbor Statement





Certain statements contained in this press release, including, without limitation, statements containing the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” and words of similar import, constitute “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or by the Securities and Exchange Commission in its rules, regulations and releases, regarding the Company’s financial and business prospects. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, those set forth in the Company’s Annual Report and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained or incorporation by reference herein to reflect future events or developments.





# # #





Company contact:        John M. LeFrere


Tel:    +1 917 225 2800


Email: investorrelations@bhcousa.com
#### § 81.47 How is the OIWA Secretarial election conducted?

After the Chair of the Election Board receives the authorization of the Election, the Chair of the Secretarial Election Board will conduct the election following the procedures set out in §§ 81.19 through § 81.45 of subpart D.
### §2159. Boards of inquiry

(a) Boards of inquiry shall be convened at such places as the Secretary may prescribe to receive evidence and make findings and recommendations whether an officer who is required to show cause for retention under section 2158 of this title should be retained on active duty.

(b) A fair and impartial hearing before a board of inquiry shall be given to each officer so required to show cause for retention.

(c) If a board of inquiry determines that the officer has failed to establish that he should be retained, it shall send the record of its proceedings to a board of review.

(d) If a board of inquiry determines that the officer has established that he should be retained, his case is closed. However, at any time after one year from the date of the determination in a case arising under clause (1) of section 2158 of this title, and at any time after the date of the determination in a case arising under clause (2) of that section, an officer may again be required to show cause for retention.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 188, §322; amended Pub. L. 97–295, §2(10), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1302; renumbered §2159 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 322 of this title as this section.

Subsecs. (a), (d). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2158" for "section 321".

1982—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 97–295 inserted "of this title" after "section 321".
#### § 350.8 Scope and applicability of rules of practice.

The rules of practice of the Department of Agriculture in subpart H of part I, subtitle A, title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, are the rules of practice applicable to adjudicatory, administrative proceedings under the regulations in this part (9 CFR part 350).

[43 FR 11147, Mar. 17, 1978]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,287; TA-W-71,287A; TA-W-71,287B; TA-W-71,287C]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on October 16, 2009, applicable to workers and former workers of Masco Building Cabinet Group, Jackson, Ohio. The workers are engaged in activity related to the production of cabinets and cabinet frames used for the residential housing market. The Notice was published soon in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 11, 2009 (74 FR 65798).                

The Department has received information that the appropriate subdivision includes three affiliated production facilities that produce cabinets for the residential housing market.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers of Masco Building Cabinet Group in Waverly, Ohio, Seal Township, Ohio, and Seaman, Ohio.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-71,287 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Masco Building Cabinet Group, including on-site leased workers from Reserves Network, Jackson, Ohio (TA-W-71,287), Masco Building Cabinet Group, Waverly, Ohio (TA-W-71,287A), Masco Building Cabinet Group, Seal Township, Ohio (TA-W-71,287B), and Masco Building Cabinet Group, Seaman, Ohio (TA-W-71,287C), who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 11, 2008, through October 16, 2011, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of December 2010.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2011-512 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
### SUBCHAPTER IX—HOUSING FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS