alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          67,366
<SECURITIES>                                   474,961
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,366,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (250,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,473,039
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,483,323
<PP&E>                                       6,754,715
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,273,066)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,448,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,252,306
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,565,316
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,369,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,448,579
<SALES>                                     16,366,830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,763,247
<CGS>                                       13,614,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,383,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               132,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                90,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             310,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,407,878)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,319,878)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,319,878)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        


</TABLE>
### §351. Obligations of cooperative marketing association as issued or drawn for agricultural purposes

Notes, drafts, bills of exchange, or acceptances issued or drawn by cooperative marketing associations composed of producers of agricultural products shall be deemed to have been issued or drawn for an agricultural purpose, within the meaning of sections 348 and 349 to 352 of this title, if the proceeds thereof have been or are to be advanced by such association to any members thereof for an agricultural purpose, or have been or are to be used by such association in making payments to any members thereof on account of agricultural products delivered by such members to the association, or if such proceeds have been or are to be used by such association to meet expenditures incurred or to be incurred by the association in connection with the grading, processing, packing, preparation for market, or marketing of any agricultural product handled by such association for any of its members: Provided, That the express enumeration in this section of certain classes of paper of cooperative marketing associations as eligible for rediscount shall not be construed as rendering ineligible any other class of paper of such associations which is now eligible for rediscount.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §13A (par.), formerly §13a, as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title IV, §404, 42 Stat. 1480; renumbered §13A, Pub. L. 102–242, title I, §142(e)(1), Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2281.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of fourth par. of section 13A, formerly section 13a, as added Mar. 4, 1923. Pars. 1 to 3 and 5 of section 13A are set out as sections 348, 349, 350 and 352 of this title, respectively.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer  Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)  of the Exchange Act

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|By: |  | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 16, 2004 |  | 
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
# C_2012227EN.01001703.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2012 — Spain v Commission

(Joined Cases T-178/10, T-263/10 and T-265/10) (1)

1

(Operational programmes of the Cohesion Fund and of the ERDF managed by Spain - Request for interim payment - Evidence suggesting significant deficiency in functioning of management and control systems - Measures interrupting the period for payment - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Audit strategy - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality)

2012/C 227/25

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Urraca Caviedes and B. Conte and, in Case T-178/10, A. Steiblytė, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Actions against the Commission decisions of 12 February 2010 (Case T-178/10), 8 April 2010 (Case T-263/10) and 15 April 2010 (Case T-265/10) informing the Spanish authorities of the interruption of the period for the settlement of certain requests for interim payment submitted by the Kingdom of Spain.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that Cases T-178/10, T-263/10 and T-265/10 be joined for the purposes of judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that Cases T-178/10, T-263/10 and T-265/10 be joined for the purposes of judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**          The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of S1 Corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:(a) the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2006 filed on thedate hereof with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b) information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ John A. Stone   John A. Stone   Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchangecommission or its staff upon request.May 8, 2006
### SUBCHAPTER III—STANDARD GAUGE FOR IRON AND STEEL
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Consumer Privacy - Letter December 2, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       7,794,067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,335,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,090,568
<PP&E>                                      13,389,675
<DEPRECIATION>                              (5,089,149)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,623,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,114,271
<BONDS>                                      5,876,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       126,787
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,785,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,623,193
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,105,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,633,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             340,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,252,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                   934,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,318,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007082EN.01002706.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/27

---

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 1 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-109/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/56)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

1

---
Exhibit
13.2




PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350









In
connection with this Annual Report of Frontline Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Inger M. Klemp, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.




Date: May
2, 2008









/s/
      Inger M. KlempInger
      M. KlempPrincipal
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1997 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         193,296
<SECURITIES>                                   120,658
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,694
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               336,911
<PP&E>                                          61,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,290
<BONDS>                                             20
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,185
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                     277,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   405,296
<SALES>                                        121,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,549
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,086
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   756
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,780
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,755
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,755
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
#### § 315.2 Carcasses and parts passed for cooking; utilization for food purposes after cooking.

Carcasses and parts passed for cooking may be used for the preparation of meat food products, provided all such carcasses or parts are heated to a temperature not lower than 170 °F. for a period of not less than 30 minutes either before being used in or during the preparation of the finished product.

[37 FR 2661, Feb. 4, 1972]
§ 590.142 Filing of application. An application for inspection service will be regarded as filed only when it has been: ( a ) Filled in completely;
( b ) Signed by the applicant; and
( c ) Received in the appropriate District Office.
[85 FR 68675, Oct. 29, 2020]
#### § 381.111 Data to be entered in proper spaces.

All certificates shall be so executed that the data entered thereon will appear in the proper spaces on each copy of the certificate.
#### § 354.109 Fees or charges for inspection service performed under cooperative agreement.

Fees or charges to be made to an applicant for any inspection service which differ from those listed in §§ 354.100 through 354.107 shall be provided for by a cooperative agreement.
#### § 537.3 Notification.

Each official establishment must promptly notify the local FSIS District Office within 24 hours of learning or determining that an adulterated or misbranded fish product received by or originating from the official establishment has entered commerce, in accordance with the requirements of 9 CFR part 418.
#### § 592.120 Authority of applicant.

Proof of the authority of any person applying for any service may be required at the discretion of the Administrator.
#### The City of New York, Respondent, v. Nathan Kovensky and Others, Appellants.

Judgment .of the Municipal Court -affirmed by default, with costs. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
#### § 381.86 Inflammatory processes.

Any organ or other part of a carcass which is affected by an inflammatory process shall be condemned and, if there is evidence of general systemic disturbance, the whole carcass shall be condemned.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002












CERTIFICATION OF CUSTODIAN







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Family Healthcare Solutions, Inc. , a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Teodoro F. Franco L. , certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:







(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated: February 17, 2004







*/s/Teodoro F. Franco L.*Teodoro F. Franco L.
Sole Officer/Director
EXHIBIT 23




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Homeland Holding Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-37335) of our report
dated March 24, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of Homeland Holding Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 28, 1996,
and December 30, 1995, and for the 20 weeks ended December 28, 1996, 32 weeks
ended August 10, 1996, 52 weeks ended December 30, 1995, and December 31, 
1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





                                               COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 28, 1997
### §76. President of bank as member of board; chairman of board

The president of the bank shall be a member of the board and shall be the chairman thereof, but the board may designate a director in lieu of the president to be chairman of the board, who shall perform such duties as may be designated by the board.

(R.S. §5150; Feb. 25, 1927, ch. 191, §6, 44 Stat. 1228.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5150 derived from act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, §9, 13 Stat. 102, which was the National Bank Act. See section 38 of this title.

#### Amendments

1927—Act Feb. 25, 1927, amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "One of the directors, to be chosen by the board, shall be president of the board."
### §2117. Selection boards; reports

(a) Each board convened under section 2106 of this title shall submit a report in writing, signed by all the members thereof, containing the names of the officers recommended for promotion and the names of those officers recommended to be advanced to the top of the list of selectees established by the Secretary under section 2121(a) of this title.

(b) A board convened under section 2106 of this title shall certify that, in the opinion of at least a majority of the members if the board has five members, or in the opinion of at least two-thirds of the members if the board has more than five members, the officers recommended for promotion are the best qualified for promotion to meet the needs of the service (as noted in specific direction furnished the board by the Secretary under section 2115 of this title) of those officers whose names have been furnished to the board.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 180, §260; amended Pub. L. 107–295, title III, §313(2), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2103; Pub. L. 111–281, title II, §212(4), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2915; renumbered §2117 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 260 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2106" for "section 251" and "section 2121(a)" for "section 271(a)".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2106" for "section 251" and "section 2115" for "section 258".

2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–281 inserted "to meet the needs of the service (as noted in specific direction furnished the board by the Secretary under section 258 of this title)" after "qualified for promotion".

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–295 inserted "and the names of those officers recommended to be advanced to the top of the list of selectees established by the Secretary under section 271(a) of this title" before period at end.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10196

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jorge Luis Barrera-Telles, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 3:21-CR-104-1

Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jorge Barrera-Telles was sentenced, under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1), to

eighteen months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release (“SR”)

for illegally reentering in violation of § 1326(a). Barrera-Telles contends that 

the district court erred in imposing a term of SR exceeding one year. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10196 Document: 00516464591 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/08/2022
No. 22-10196

2

Because Barrera-Telles did not object in the district court to the application of § 1326(b)(1), we review for plain error only. See United States v. 

Rodriguez-Flores, 25 F.4th 385, 387 (5th Cir. 2022). For that, the appellant 

must show, inter alia, a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects 

his substantial rights. Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). 

Illegally reentering the United States after removal ordinarily carries 

a two-year maximum imprisonment under § 1326(a) and a one-year maximum SR. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3559(a)(5), 3583(b)(3). But, if the defendant was 

previously removed after a felony conviction, the maximum prison sentence 

is ten years under § 1326(b)(1), and the maximum SR is three years. See

§§ 3559(a)(3), 3583(b)(2). 

Although Barrera-Telles now maintains that nothing in the record 

establishesthat he was convicted of a felony before his prior removal, we have 

permitted, on plain-error review, supplementation of the record with documents supporting a sentencing enhancement. See United States v. VargasSoto, 700 F.3d 180, 183 (5th Cir. 2012). The government supplemented the 

record with documents establishing that, before his prior removal, BarreraTelles was convicted of transporting a controlled substance in violation of 

California Health and Safety Code § 11352(a). Because a § 11352(a) conviction is punishable by more than one year of imprisonment, it qualifies as a 

felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(1). See § 3559(a)(5)–(6); United States v. 

Villegas-Hernandez, 468 F.3d 874, 884 (5th Cir. 2006) (holding that a felony 

is an offense that is punishable by more than one year of imprisonment), 

overruled in part on other grounds by United States v. Reyes-Contreras, 910 F.3d 

169, 181–82 (5th Cir. 2018) (en banc). Thus, the district court did not plainly 

err in sentencing Barrera-Telles to three years of SR. See Puckett, 556 U.S. 

at 135. 

AFFIRMED. 

Case: 22-10196 Document: 00516464591 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/08/2022