alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


                The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of Brand
                Services, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify for purposes of
                18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that (i) the Company's Quarterly Report
                on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of the Company's fiscal year
                ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), as filed with the
                Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002, complies
                with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) information contained
                in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



                                              /s/  Jeffrey W. Peterson
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Jeffrey W. Peterson
                                              Chief Financial Officer,
                                              Vice President




                August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001063018
<NAME>                        ISG RESOURCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                1.000
<CASH>                         0
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  19,905,671
<ALLOWANCES>                   346,000
<INVENTORY>                    4,820,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               26,906,698
<PP&E>                         44,213,428
<DEPRECIATION>                 9,060,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 223,404,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          17,424,575
<BONDS>                        100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<COMMON>                       0
<OTHER-SE>                     24,001,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   223,404,027
<SALES>                        24,467,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               32,518,204
<CGS>                          19,121,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  24,737,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               8,700,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             3,538,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (4,409,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                   1,248,765
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (3,160,417)
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   (3,160,417)
<EPS-BASIC>                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO **

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|                                                                                          |                                                                                              |                                          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| *        Date:                  March 14, 2007*  | *By:*                                                                                   | /s/ *Warren                  B. Kanders* |
|                                                                                          |                                                                                                   |
|                                                                                          | *Warren                  B. KandersExecutive Chairman of the Board of                  Directors* |

----
美国农业部农村发展局如何确保遵守

非歧视责任?

美国农业部农村发展局将定期对你的计划和活动进行审查,以确保它

们符合民权法。美国农业部农村发展局是你向公众提供平等机会的合

作伙伴。

我们必须遵循哪些联邦民权法以确保合规? 

受助人必须遵守的适用联邦民权法包括:

联邦民权法

法规

禁止基于以下原因

的歧视 美国法典

平等信贷机会法

种族、肤色、宗教、

国籍、性别、婚姻状

况、年龄 15 USC 1691

公平住房法(1968年民权

法第八章)

种族、肤色、国籍、宗教、性

别、家庭状况、残疾 42 USC 3601

1964年《民权法案》第六章 种族、肤色、国籍

42 USC 

2000d-2000d-7

1973年《康复法》第504条 残疾 29 USC 794

1974年《住房和社区发展

法》第一章第109节 

种族、肤色、国籍、性别、

宗教 42 USC 3535d

1990年《美国残疾人法》第

二和第三章,经修订 残疾

42 USC 12101 

和 12181

1975年《年龄歧视法》,经

修订 年龄 42 USC 6101 及其后

1972年《教育修正法》第

九章 性别 20 USC 1681-1688

欲了解更多信息

请联系美国农业部农村发展局民权办公室。

美国农业部是一个平等机会的提供者、雇主和贷款人。

PA-2206 | 2022年8月修订

遵守民权法规 

是您身为美国农业部农村发展署合作伙伴 

应当履行的义务

共促美国繁荣发展

rd.usda.gov/about-rd/offices/civil-rights

1 (800) 787-8821 (免费电话) 

1 (800) 877-8339 (联邦中转) 

RA.RD.MOSTL.CivilRights@usda.gov

封面照片由UpstateNYer拍摄。经许可使用。
谁被要求遵守联邦民权法?

如果你从美国农业部农村发展局获得联邦资金或联邦资金或援助(如贷

款或赠款),你必须遵守联邦民权法,为所有人提供平等的机会参与你提

供的计划和活动。例如,你不得拒绝或排斥任何人参与计划、服务、援助

或福利。此外,你不得以任何方式对提出投诉或反对任何非法或歧视性

做法的人进行报复。

本指南提供了一个基本概述,说明你在向公众提供项目和活动时,在联

邦法律所涵盖的基础上确保不歧视的责任。这些基础包括种族、肤色、国

籍、性别(在教育项目或活动中)、年龄和残疾。它还包括一份你必须遵守

的适用民权法律的清单。

什么是 “联邦资金或援助”?

联邦资金或援助包括:

• 通过补助金、次级补助金、合作协议、挑战成本分担协议、成本偿还协议

或贷款提供的联邦资金

• 由联邦机构提供的培训

• 联邦人员的借用或临时指派

(例如,让美国农业部农村发展局的雇员在当地大学指导课程)

• 以低于市场价值的价格出借或使用联邦财产

我们是联邦资金和援助的接受者吗?

如果你通过与美国农业部农村发展局的合作,接受联邦资金或援助 - 直接

或通过另一个接受者 - 进行你向公众提供的计划,你就是一个 “接受者”。

接受者包括:

• 任何接受联邦资金或援助的个人

• 一个州或地方政府

• 美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民个人、部落、公司或组织

• 任何公共或私人机构、机关或组织,如大学、学院或非营利机构

我们在遵守联邦民权法方面有什么责任?

作为美国农业部农村发展局负责遵守联邦民权法的合作伙伴,你必须: 

• 签署一份保证书,证明你将遵守民权法。如果你有次级接受者,请从他

们那里得到一份签署的保证书。

• 在你的公共接待区或其他公众可见的地方张贴 “人人享有公正 “的美

国农业部海报(AD-475A 协助海报)。联系你的美国农业部农村发展办

公室,以获得副本。

• 在你的出版物和外展材料中包括以下声明:

如果在计划中遭到歧视要投诉,请访问 

http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html 或前往美国农

业部各办公室,填写《美国农业部计划歧视投诉表》(AD-3027),或

者写信邮寄到美国农业部并在信中提供投诉表中所需的全部信息。

要索取投诉表的副本,请致电 (866) 632-9992。通过以下方式将填

妥的表格或信件寄给美国农业部:

邮寄地址: 美国农业部 (U.S. Department of Agriculture) 

 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 

 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, 

 Washington, D.C. 20250-9410

传真: (833) 256-1665 | (202) 690-7442

电子邮箱: program.intake@usda.gov.

• 如果出版物或材料太小,不允许使用完整的声明,至少应包括以下声

明,其印刷尺寸不小于相关文本:

本机构是一个平等机会提供者。

• 如果你的出版物和宣传材料与贷款或赠款项目有关,应包括与美国农

业部农村发展局的关系声明,如:

本出版物通过美国农业部的补助金得以出版。

–或–

本项目是与美国农业部农村发展局合作进行的。

• 根据你的客户群,为残疾人提供替代格式的项目信息,为英语水平有限

的人提供替代语言。

• 确定一个人负责确保你的项目符合民权要求。

• 审查你的所有政策、程序和做法,以确保它们不因种族、肤色、国籍、年

龄、残疾或性别(在教育计划和活动中)而限制参与

• 评估你的项目和设施的无障碍性。如果它们现在不是无障碍的,制定一

个过渡计划,使它们成为无障碍的,然后适当地执行该计划。

• 确保你的员工了解他们的民权责任,包括他们在美国农业部投诉程序

中的作用。

• 在你宣传或推销你的计划时,向各种各样的社区提供宣传,以确保多

样性。

• 向美国农业部农村发展部通报您对计划参与者正在进行的外展活动
#### § 352.18 Cooperation of States in Federal programs.

Under the “Talmadge-Aiken Act” of September 28, 1962 (7 U.S.C. 450), the Administrator is authorized to utilize employees and facilities of States in carrying out Federal functions.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00219-CV

Emily YOUNG and Albert Morrison,

Appellants

v.

Eldon ROALSON, Roalson Interests, Inc.; Douglas Miller II; and Jim Guy Egbert,

Appellees

From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-09-24412-CV

Honorable Daniel J. Kindred, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE WATKINS, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. We order 

appellants to pay the costs of this appeal.

SIGNED August 25, 2021.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict.
    Date: March 15, 2011.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 10 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Ramesh Vemuri, PhD, Chief, Scientific Review 
Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C-212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-
7700, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0a2a6e2e3a290beb9b8feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="245652161756644a4d4c0a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 25, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4826 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §718. Training; emergency response providers

(a) In General.—The Commandant may, on a reimbursable or a non-reimbursable basis, make a training available to emergency response providers whenever the Commandant determines that—

(1) a member of the Coast Guard, who is scheduled to participate in such training, is unable or unavailable to participate in such training;

(2) no other member of the Coast Guard, who is assigned to the unit to which the member of the Coast Guard who is unable or unavailable to participate in such training is assigned, is able or available to participate in such training; and

(3) such training, if made available to such emergency response providers, would further the goal of interoperability among Federal agencies, non-Federal governmental agencies, or both.

(b) Emergency Response Providers Defined.—In this section, the term "emergency response providers" has the meaning given that term in section 2 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101).

(c) Treatment of Reimbursement.—Any reimbursements for a training that the Coast Guard receives under this section shall be credited to the appropriation used to pay the costs for such training.

(d) Status; Limitation on Liability.—

(1) Status.—Any individual to whom, as an emergency response provider, training is made available under this section, who is not otherwise a Federal employee, shall not, because of that training, be considered a Federal employee for any purpose (including the purposes of chapter 81 of title 5 (relating to compensation for injury) and sections 2671 through 2680 of title 28 (relating to tort claims)).

(2) Limitation on liability.—The United States shall not be liable for actions taken by an individual in the course of training made available under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 115–282, title III, §306(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4247.)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 426 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 8, 2000.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1827) to improve the economy and efficiency of Government operations 
by requiring the use of recovery audits by Federal agencies. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the 
bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Government Reform. In 
lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Government Reform now 
printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature 
of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
considered as read. Points of order against that amendment in the nature of a 
substitute for failure to comply with clause 4 of rule XXI are waived. During 
consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 
Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 
offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee 
of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the 
Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) 
reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed 
question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business, 
provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series 
of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill 
for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 
such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 
in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill 
or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as original 
text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 2.12 Termination of a license.

A license may be terminated at any time for any reason that a license application may be denied pursuant to § 2.11 after a hearing in accordance with the applicable rules of practice in 7 CFR part 1.

[85 FR 28797, May 13, 2020]
§ 9410.8 Appeal of initial adverse determination on amendment or correction. ( a ) Any individual whose request for a correction or amendment has been denied in whole or in part may appeal that decision to the Commissioners no later than 180 days after the adverse decision is rendered.
( b ) The appeal shall be in writing and shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the individual making the appeal;
( 2 ) Identification of the record sought to be amended;
( 3 ) The record system in which that record is contained;
( 4 ) A short statement describing the amendment sought; and
( 5 ) The name and location of the Commission official who initially denied the correction or amendment.
( c ) Not later than 30 working days after the date on which the Commission receives the appeal, the Commissioners shall complete their review of the appeal and make a final decision thereon. However, for good cause shown, the Commissioners may extend that 30-day period. If the Commissioners extend the period, the individual requesting the review shall be promptly notified of the extension and the anticipated date of a decision.
( d ) After review of an appeal, the Commission shall send a written notice to the requestor containing the following information: ( 1 ) The decision and, if the denial is upheld, the reasons for the decision;
( 2 ) The right of the requestor to institute a civil action in a Federal District Court for judicial review of the decision; and
( 3 ) The right of the requestor to file with the Commission a concise statement setting forth the reasons for his or her disagreement with the Commission's denial of the correction or amendment. The Commission shall make this statement available to any person to whom the record is later disclosed, together with a brief statement, if appropriate, of the Commission's reasons for denying the requested correction or amendment. The Commission shall also send a copy of the statement to prior recipients of the individual's record if an accounting of the disclosures was made.
### §214b. Continuation of business and corporate entity

The franchise of a national banking association as a national banking association shall automatically terminate when its conversion into or its merger or consolidation with a State bank under a State charter is consummated and the resulting State bank shall be considered the same business and corporate entity as the national banking association, although as to rights, powers, and duties the resulting bank is a State bank. Any reference to such national banking association in any contract, will, or document shall be considered a reference to the State bank if not inconsistent with the provisions of the contract, will, or document or applicable law.

(Aug. 17, 1950, ch. 729, §3, 64 Stat. 456.)
### **CHAPTER 100—CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT**

Sec.
7401.
Findings.
7402.
Definitions.
7403.
National Science Foundation research.
7404.
National Science Foundation computer and network security programs.
7405.
Consultation.
7406.
National Institute of Standards and Technology programs.
7407.
Authorization of appropriations.
7408.
National Academy of Sciences study on computer and network security in critical infrastructures.
7409.
Coordination of Federal cyber security research and development.
7410.
Grant eligibility requirements and compliance with immigration laws.
7411.
Report on grant and fellowship programs.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Steven Scott Carroll, Defendant-Appellant.

(Nos. 73-378, 73-409 cons.;

Fifth District

December 3, 1974.

Robert Farrell, of Mt. Vernon, and Lynn Sara Frackman, of Chicago, both of State Appellate Defender’s Office, for appellant.

Robert J. Neely, State’s Attorney, of Metropolis (Guy Lahr, III, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel, and Darrell L. Conley, legal researcher), for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS

delivered the opinion of the court;

Defendant, Steven Scott Carroll, was indicted by the Massac County grand jury on March 8, 1973, charging him with criminal trespass to a motor vehicle and escape. At the arraignment on May 8, 1973, a third count charging defendant with unlawful use of weapons was added by information. Pursuant to plea negotiations the charge of escape was dropped and the defendant plead guilty to the other two charges. On June 15, 1973, after a sentencing hearing, the defendant was sentenced to 1 year less 1 day on each charge with the sentence to be served concurrently.

The same defendant, Steven Scott Carroll, on June 6, 1973, was indicted by the grand jury of Massac County charging him with two counts of escape and with one count of aiding an escape. On September 11,1973, pursuant to plea negotiations the defendant plead guilty to one charge of escape, the other charges were dismissed. He was sentenced to a term of from 1 to 3 years. The defendant has appealed the convictions in each case from the Circuit Court of Massac County and the cases have been consolidated for opinion.

The primary thrust of the appeal in each case is that the trial court *512failed to warn the defendant of the possibility of consecutive sentences before accepting the pleas of guilty in violation of Supreme Court Rule 402(a)(2) (Ill. Rev. Stat. (1973), ch. 110A, par. 402(a)(2)). The record does not reveal that the defendant was admonished as to the possibility of consecutive sentences.

We note that each case involved negotiated pleas. We have previously considered this problem in *People v. Back,*18 Ill.App.3d 746, 310 N.E.2d 421. There we held that the failure to inform the guilty pleading defendant of the possibility of consecutive sentences, standing alone did not constitute reversible error where the defendant entered a negotiated plea. The defendant knew at the time he entered his guilty plea what the sentence would be and that it would not involve consecutive sentences. We adhere to our decision in *People v. Back, supra,*and find that the failure to admonish die defendant of the possibility of consecutive sentences in the two cases before us does not constitute reversible error.

The judgment of the Circuit Court of Massac County in each case is therefore affirmed.

G. MORAN, P. J., and CARTER, J., concur.
EX-31

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications. 

 

I, Jeffrey Orr, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C7 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, and Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., as Primary Servicer.

 

Dated: March 30, 2015

 

 

/s/Jeffrey Orr

 

 

Jeffrey Orr, President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)