alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010209EN.01005602.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/56

---

Action brought on 11 June 2010 — Lebedef v Commission

(Case F-44/10)

()

2010/C 209/91

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision rejecting the applicant’s request for authorisation to stay in a place other than his place of employment during sick leave.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 13 August 2009 rejecting the request brought by the applicant for authorisation to stay in a place other than his place of employment during his sick leave from 3 August to 3 September 2009 and, in particular, during the period from 13 to 30 August 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 13 August 2009 rejecting the request brought by the applicant for authorisation to stay in a place other than his place of employment during his sick leave from 3 August to 3 September 2009 and, in particular, during the period from 13 to 30 August 2009;

| — | grant the applicant damages for non-material harm equivalent to 5 days’ remuneration, calculated on the basis of one twentieth of his monthly remuneration per day compensated; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the applicant damages for non-material harm equivalent to 5 days’ remuneration, calculated on the basis of one twentieth of his monthly remuneration per day compensated;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLARENCE SAUNDERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 564 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         816,903
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         693,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         238,161
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           238,161
<LOANS>                                      5,668,999
<ALLOWANCE>                                     32,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,502,152
<DEPOSITS>                                   5,094,068
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            125,983
<LONG-TERM>                                    600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           990
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,681,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,502,152
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                379,527
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,983
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                44,220
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               427,730
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             209,922
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             239,072
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          188,658
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                150,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,440
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      43,440
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,496
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.91
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    92,120
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                32,700
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               32,700
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            32,700
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Hamilton, Montana. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss upcoming projects.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held March 22, 2011 at 6:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at 1801 N. First Street. Written comments should be sent to Stevensville RD, 88 Main Street, Stevensville, MT 59870. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to                         *dritter@fs.fed.us*                         or via facsimile to 406-777-5461.                    

All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record and are available for public inspection and copying. The public may inspect comments received at 88 Main Street, Stevensville, MT. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to 406-777-5461 to facilitate entry into the building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Daniel G Ritter, District Ranger, Nancy Trotter, Coordinator.

Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Council discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Council members. However, persons who wish to bring pertinent matters to the attention of the Council may file written statements with the Council staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by March 21, 2011 will have the opportunity to address the Council at those sessions.

Dated: March 2, 2011.

Julie K. King,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2011-5164 Filed 3-7-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
### SUBCHAPTER II—MISCELLANEOUS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §107(c)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4207, inserted subchapter II designation and heading.
RD Form 1951-65 Form Approved

OMB No. 0575-0184 

Exp. Date: 01/31/2025

(10-03)

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Rural Development

St. Louis, Missouri

Customer Initiated Payments ( CIP )

Enrollment Form

Please process my request pertaining to the Customer Initiated Payments (CIP) program which uses the Automated Clearing House (ACH)

to pay my Rural Utilities Service loan. I understand that the CIP/ACH payments will only be made for my organization on the date that I

authorize from the contact our organization makes with the CIP provider.

Current date :

Action Requested: Add Delete

MASTER FILE CIP DATA

Reference No.: (last 5 or 6 digits as shown on RUS Form 615)

Borrower Name:

Address:

City/State/Zip: I

Contact Person/Title: (Please Print)

Signature of Contact: (Signature Only)

Telephone No.:

Fax No.:

Routing Transit No.: (Must be 9 Digits)

Account No.:

Acct. Type: Corporate Checking Consumer Checking Savings

Effective Date:

If routing transit no. or bank account is new, please send a VOIDED check or deposit slip

Fax this completed form and attachments to: OR Mail this completed form with attachments to:

USDA/Rural Development/RUS

ATTN: Cash Management Branch

Mail Code: FC-363

P. 0. Box 200011

St. Louis, MO 63120-0011

USDA / Rural Development / RUS

DCFO/CMB

ATTN: Janice/Georgia

314 - 457- 4370

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection

of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0575-0184. The

time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,

searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

Privacy Act Statement

The following information is provided to comply with the Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579). The information requested on the form is required under

various provisions of title 15 U.S.C. 1601, 12 CFR 205 and 31 CFR 202, for the purpose of providing the authority to the Department of Treasury

to designate financial institutions to collect payments, by electronic means, from your account. The information will be used for identification with

the records of the government agency and the financial institution to direct your payments to the point you authorize.

Change

-
### SUBCHAPTER I—UNITED STATES WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING IMPROVEMENT
### §2766. Travel card management

(a) In General.—The Secretary may require that travel or transportation allowances due a civilian employee or military member of the Coast Guard be disbursed directly to the issuer of a Federal contractor-issued travel charge card, but only in an amount not to exceed the authorized travel expenses charged by that Coast Guard member to that travel charge card issued to that employee or member.

(b) Withholding of Nondisputed Obligations.—The Secretary may also establish requirements similar to those established by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 2784a of title 10 for deduction or withholding of pay or retired pay from a Coast Guard employee, member, or retired member who is delinquent in payment under the terms of the contract under which the card was issued and does not dispute the amount of the delinquency.

(Added Pub. L. 108–293, title II, §210(a), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1036, §517; renumbered §2766, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 517 of this title as this section.
**Exhibit 13.2****GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B.****SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Salvi Rafael Folch Viadero, the Chief Financial Officer of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (the“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:1. The Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, towhich this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date:June 26, 2007         By:    /s/ Salvi Rafael Folch Viadero    Name:  Salvi Rafael Folch Viadero    Title:  Chief Financial Officer
#### Richard James et al., Respondents, v Greenpoint Financial Corp. et al., Defendants, and OCI Mortgage Corporation et al., Appellants.

[825 NYS2d 114]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant H.P. Greenfield Real Estate, Ltd., sued herein as Century 21 HP Greenfield Real Estate appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Johnson, J.), dated December 2, 2004, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant OCI Mortgage Corporation separately appeals from so much of the same order as *645denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

A managing agent of a building is subject to liability for nonfeasance only if the managing agent was in complete and exclusive control of the management and operation of the building *(see Lennon v Oakhurst Gardens Corp.,*229 AD2d 897 [1996]; *Ioannidou v Kingswood Mgt. Corp.,*203 AD2d 248, 249 [1994]; *Keo v Kimball Brooklands Corp.,*189 AD2d 679 [1993]; *Jones v Park Realty, 168*AD2d 945 [1990], *affd*79 NY2d 795 [1991]). Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the defendant H.E Greenfield Real Estate, Ltd., sued herein as Century 21 HP Greenfield Real Estate (hereinafter Century 21) tendered sufficient evidence to show the absence of a triable issue of fact *(see*CPLR 3212; *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). However, in opposition, the plaintiffs established the existence of a triable issue of fact with respect to whether Century 21 was in complete and exclusive control of the management of the subject property during the infant plaintiffs alleged exposure to lead *(see Ingordo v Square Plus Operating Corp.,*276 AD2d 528 [2000]).

Moreover, although Century 21 and the defendant OCI Mortgage Corporation (hereinafter collectively the movants) established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the issue of causation, the plaintiffs demonstrated the existence of triable issues of fact with respect to whether the movants’ alleged negligence was a substantial factor in causing and in exacerbating the infant plaintiff’s injuries *(see Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp.,*51 NY2d 308, 315 [1980]).

The movants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.E, Goldstein, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 85—ARMORED CAR INDUSTRY RECIPROCITY**

Sec.
5901.
Findings.
5902.
State reciprocity of weapons licenses issued to armored car company crew members.
5903.
Relation to other laws.
5904.
Definitions.
### §§441 to 448. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections, act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §18, 38 Stat. 268, as amended by acts Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, title IV, §401, 48 Stat. 6; Sept. 23, 1994, Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(g)(7), 108 Stat. 2293, are omitted as obsolete.

Section 441 provided that at any time during a period of twenty years from Dec. 23, 1915, any member bank desiring to retire the whole or any part of its circulating notes file with the Treasurer of the United States an application to sell for its account, at par and accrued interest, United States bonds, securing circulation to be retired.

Section 442 related to purchase of bonds by reserve banks.

Section 443 related to transfer of bonds purchased, payment, and cancellation of circulating notes of member banks.

Section 444 related to issuance of circulating notes to reserve banks purchasing bonds.

Section 445 provided for issuance of circulating notes to Federal Reserve banks. Act June 12, 1945, ch. 186, §3, 59 Stat. 238, provided that all power and authority with respect to the issuance of circulating notes, known as Federal Reserve bank notes, pursuant to this section would cease and terminate on June 12, 1945.

Section 446 related to exchange by reserve banks of bonds bearing circulating privilege for those without such privilege.

Section 447 related to form of bonds and conditions of issuance.

Section 448 related to exchange of one-year gold notes for 3 per centum gold bonds.
§ 700.283 Requests for access to records: Special situations. ( a ) *Medical records.* ( 1 ) Medical records shall be disclosed to the individual to whom they pertain unless it is determined, in consultation with a medical doctor, that disclosure should be made to a medical doctor of the individual's choosing.
( 2 ) If it is determined that disclosure of medical records directly to the individual to whom they pertain could have an adverse effect on that individual, the individual may designate a medical doctor to receive the records and the records will be disclosed to that doctor.
( b ) *Inspection in presence of third party.* ( 1 ) An individual wishing to inspect records pertaining to him which have been opened for his inspection may, during the inspection, be accompanied by a person of his own choosing.
( 2 ) When such a procedure is deemed appropriate, the individual to whom the records pertain may be required to furnish a written statement authorizing discussion of his record in the accompanying person's presence.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

      For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

                                             or

( )   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number        0-17679
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
From: Nicholas Ammann [ mailto:nammann@apple.com ]

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:35 PM

To: Exparte Communications

Subject: Request for Information on Evaluating New Products for the Battery Chargers and External

Power Supply Rulemaking

- Ex Parte Communication

Below are a list of topics that Apple Inc. discussed with DOE.

- Timeline for the effective date of the DOE batt ery charger efficiency regulation and the

external power supply regulation.

- Flexibility of DOE Battery Charger efficiency mark, including using software or package as an

alternate to marking the product surface.

- Discussion of replacement parts and refurbished products produced prior to the DOE effective

date.

- Discussion of DOE proposed EPS Level VI efficiency criteria as compared to that of Level V

and how the implementation date has an impact on manufacturers.
# C_2007095EN.01003401.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/34

---

Action brought on 13 March 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-146/07)

(2007/C 95/65)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Simonsson and W. Wils, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 (1) on the resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive, and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 (1) on the resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive, and

1

| — | order Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit prescribed for implementing the Directive expired on 31 December 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 272, p. 32.

1

---