alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 11935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5032]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 11935]]


                Proclamation 8632 of February 28, 2011

                
Death of Army Corporal Frank W. Buckles, the Last 
                Surviving American Veteran of World War I

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                As a mark of respect for the memory of Army Corporal 
                Frank W. Buckles, the last surviving American veteran 
                of World War I, and in remembrance of the generation of 
                American veterans of World War I, I hereby order, by 
                the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the 
                laws of the United States of America, that, on the day 
                of his interment, the flag of the United States shall 
                be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all 
                public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and 
                naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal 
                Government in the District of Columbia and throughout 
                the United States and its Territories and possessions 
                until sunset on such day. I further direct that the 
                flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same period 
                at all United States embassies, legations, consular 
                offices, and other facilities abroad, including all 
                military facilities and naval vessels and stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                twenty-eighth day of February, in the year of our Lord 
                two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the 
                United States of America the two hundred and thirty-
                fifth.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 2011-5032
Filed 3-2-11; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3195-W1-P
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RENEE D. CLOUSE,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

ROBERT WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2017-2087

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 16-140, Judge Coral Wong Pietsch.

______________________ 

Decided: October 9, 2018

______________________ 

CHRIS ATTIG, Attig Steel, PLLC, Little Rock, AR, argued for claimant-appellant. 

 DAVID PEHLKE, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by CLAUDIA BURKE, ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR.,

CHAD A. READLER; MARTIE ADELMAN, BRIAN D. GRIFFIN, 
2 CLOUSE v. WILKIE

Office of General Counsel, United States Department of 

Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. 

 ______________________ 

Before LOURIE, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

STOLL, Circuit Judge. 

Petitioner Renee D. Clouse appeals from a decision of 

the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

dismissing her appeal from a decision by the Board of 

Veterans’ Appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7292(c). Because there 

was no final decision over which the Veterans Court could 

exercise jurisdiction, we affirm.

The parties do not dispute that the Board has repeatedly failed to provide adequate notice of its orders

throughout the pendency of Petitioner’s claims. We 

understand that these errors, which have caused substantial delay in the resolution of Petitioner’s claims, will be 

resolved. In addition, the Government confirmed during 

oral argument that Petitioner should not be prevented 

from presenting additional evidence to the Board prior to 

the issuance of a renewed final decision.

Because the Board decision that formed the basis for 

Petitioner’s appeal was properly vacated before a notice of 

appeal was filed, however, the Veterans Court did not 

have jurisdiction to hear the appeal. The decision of the 

Veterans Court to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed. 

AFFIRMED

COSTS

No costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Operations and the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                            5200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    72800
<ALLOWANCES>                                      5300
<INVENTORY>                                     139100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                226500
<PP&E>                                          321100
<DEPRECIATION>                                  155000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  449600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           133500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3500
<OTHER-SE>                                      192600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    449600
<SALES>                                         431300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                451400
<CGS>                                           230500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   230500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                169600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  46400
<INCOME-TAX>                                     17600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              28800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     28800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2012-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated   March 21, 2014 |                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                               |
|                        |                                               |
|                        | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|                        | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|                        | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Larry Patterson, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59271;

First District (4th Division)

October 23, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Thomas F. Finegan, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE' JOHNSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

On July 30, 1971, defendant was indicted for the offense of rape under complaint No. 71-2103. In a trial before the Honorable Kenneth R. Wendt and a jury, a mistrial was declared after it was determined that the jury was deadlocked and would continue to be unable to agree on a verdict.

A second jury trial commenced before the Honorable Russell R. DeBow on June 27, 1972. The' jury returned a verdict of guilty of rape. On July 25, 1972, the defendant was sentenced to a term of 4 to 8 years in the penitentiary. He filed a notice of appeal from the conviction on August 15, 1972.

The public defender of Cook County was appointed to represent the defendant. On July 9, 1974, the public defender filed a motion in this court for. leave to withdraw as counsel pursuant to *Anders v. California*(1967), 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, 87 S.Ct. 1396. The motion represents that counsel has carefully searched the record, finds no meritorious issues to be raised on appeal, and believes that an appeal would be wholly frivolous.

Copies of the public defender’s motion and brief were mailed to the *129defendant on July 9, 1974. Defendant was further advised by this court that he had until September 11, 1974, to file any points in support of his appeal, after which date the court would make a full examination of all proceedings and decide whether the appeal is frivolous. The defendant has neither obtained new counsel nor filed any briefs in support of his appeal.

After reviewing the record, we concur in the opinion of the public defender that there are no additional grounds for appeal which are not frivolous. Accordingly, the motion of the public defender for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted and the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed.

Motion allowed.

Judgment affirmed.

ADESKO, P. J., and BURMAN, J„ concur.
### §2279aa–10. Funding for guarantee; reserves of Corporation

#### (a) Guarantee

The Corporation shall provide guarantees for securities representing interests in, or obligations backed by, pools of qualified loans through commitments issued by the Corporation providing for guarantees.

#### (b) Guarantee fees

#### (1) Initial fee

At the time a guarantee is issued by the Corporation, the Corporation shall assess the certified facility a fee of not more than 1⁄2 of 1 percent of the initial principal amount of each pool of qualified loans.

#### (2) Annual fees

Beginning in the second year after the date the guarantee is issued under paragraph (1), the Corporation may, at the end of each year, assess the certified facility an annual fee of not more than 1⁄2 of 1 percent of the principal amount of the loans then constituting the pool.

#### (3) Determination of amount

The Corporation shall establish such fees on the amount of risk incurred by the Corporation in providing the guarantees with respect to which such fee is assessed, as determined by the Corporation. Fees assessed under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be established on an actuarially sound basis.

#### (4) Review by GAO

The Comptroller General of the United States may review, and submit to the Congress a report regarding, the actuarial soundness and reasonableness of the fees established by the Corporation under this subsection.

#### (c) Corporation reserve against guarantees losses required

#### (1) In general

So much of the fees assessed under this section as the Board determines to be necessary shall be set aside by the Corporation in a segregated account as a reserve against losses arising out of the guarantee activities of the Corporation.

#### (2) Exhaustion of reserve required

The Corporation may not issue obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury under section 2279aa–13 of this title in order to meet the obligations of the Corporation with respect to any guarantees provided under this subchapter until the reserve established under paragraph (1) has been exhausted.

#### (d) Fees to cover administrative costs authorized

The Corporation may impose charges or fees in reasonable amounts in connection with the administration of its activities under this subchapter to recover its costs for performing such administration.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title VIII, §8.10, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title VII, §702, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1701; amended Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §106(f), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3831.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 104–316 substituted "Review" for "Annual review" in heading and "may review" for "shall annually review" in text.
EXHIBIT 12.1

                                                      Exhibit 12.1
  
                WALDEN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED
          FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS (2)
                      (Dollars in Thousands)
                                 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          For the Period
                                                        Year Ended       February 9, 1994
                                                       December 31,     (Commencement of
                                                     ----------------  Operations) through
                                                     1996        1995   December 31, 1994
                                                     ----        ----  -------------------
<S>                                                <C>         <C>          <C>
Income before extraordinary item . . . . . .       $19,122     $10,685      $ 5,356
Add:
   Interest on indebtedness. . . . . . . . .        20,573      17,111        6,288
   Amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           916         900          371
                                                   -------     -------      -------
     Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $40,611     $28,696      $12,015
                                                   =======     =======      =======
Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends:
   Interest on indebtedness. . . . . . . . .       $20,573     $17,111      $ 6,288
   Amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           916         900          371
                                                   -------     -------      -------
     Fixed charges . . . . . . . . . . . . .        21,489      18,011        6,659
   Add:
     Preferred stock dividends (1) . . . . .         4,092         922          --
                                                   -------     -------      -------
        Combined fixed charges and
          preferred stock dividends. . . . .       $25,581     $18,933      $ 6,659
                                                   =======     =======      =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges . . . . .         1.89x       1.59x        1.80x
  
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
  preferred stock dividends. . . . . . . . .         1.59x       1.52x        1.80x
</TABLE>
  
(1)   Includes preferred stock dividends on convertible equity
      securities and preferred stock.
  
(2)   Computation of the ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
      and preferred stock dividends has not been provided for Walden
      Predecessors because the capital structure has changed
      substantially since the Company's formation and the
      information relating to Walden Predecessors would be
      meaningless.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

 

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Launches Set of Dashboards to Help Policymakers and Industry Leaders Preserve 

Rural Multi-Family Housing 

(October 28, 2016) – USDA Rural Housing Service Administrator Tony Hernandez today unveiled a set of five dashboards

designed to provide key data about and preserve the affordability of USDA’s Multi-Family Housing (MFH) properties. The 

publicly accessible, user-friendly set - currently available in beta - is designed to help policymakers and industry leaders 

collect, track and analyze the timeframe for when the USDA mortgage will be paid off, and the property exits USDA’s 

MFH program. 

Collecting this data will help landlords and key industry leaders better plan and take whatever long-term strategies are 

appropriate, including re-amortization, deferring loan payments, seeking new loans for rehabilitation, transferring 

properties to new owners, or take other actions to preserve affordable rental housing in rural areas. 

The beta Property Preservation Dashboards can be publicly accessed on the Tableau Public Website. They complement 

data resources released by USDA earlier this year, including its rural housing investment data, program exit data, and 

mapped data overlaid with thousands of other indicators in PolicyMap. The Dashboard enable users to obtain such 

critical information as the number of USDA MFH properties exist in each state and details on projected dates for 

mortgage pay-offs. 

Users can narrow the data by location, program and other indicators. The dashboards also feature a user guide and data 

dictionary.

The new dashboards support the Department’s effort to become more transparent and facilitate effective 

collaboration with USDA’s stakeholders, partners, and lawmakers to address rural community needs. It also 

complements the Obama administration’s Open Data Policy and Executive Order to promote transparency and deliver 

efficient services to the public. 

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Horizon Holding Corporation (the Company), for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dwain Brannon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Dwain Brannon       
|Dwain Brannon           
|Chief Executive Officer 
|                        
|Dated: November 14, 2005



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Horizon Holding Corporation and will be retained by Horizon Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2511. Investigations of flag officers and Senior Executive Service employees

In conducting an investigation into an allegation of misconduct by a flag officer or member of the Senior Executive Service serving in the Coast Guard, the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security shall—

(1) conduct the investigation in a manner consistent with Department of Defense policies for such an investigation; and

(2) consult with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 114–120, title II, §220(a), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 48, §430; renumbered §2511, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §114(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4223.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 430 of this title as this section.
## Browse All Stories

### Love Continues to Grow at Lovefood Farm

[Read More]

05.04.2023

EntrepreneurFood SupplyKnow Your FarmerLocal FoodsLocal ProduceSmall BusinessSustainable/Organic FoodsValue Added

### REAP Funding Helps Pennsylvania Business Go Solar

[Read More]

03.23.2023

Economic DevelopmentElectricGrantsLocal ProduceREAPSolar EnergySustainable/Organic Foods

### Sustainability at the Core

[Read More]

03.15.2023

EnergyGrantsSustainable/Organic FoodsLocal ProduceMade in Rural AmericaREAPRural DevelopmentSmall BusinessSolar EnergyValue Added

### Solar: It’s a “Big Dill” for Real Pickles Cooperative

[Read More]

10.20.2022

CooperativesEnergySustainable/Organic FoodsLocal FoodsLocal ProduceREAPRenewable EnergyRural Development

### USDA Partners with One Small Farm to Make Enormous Impact

[Read More]

10.19.2022

BusinessFood SupplyGrantsLocal FoodsSustainable/Organic FoodsValue Added

### The Perks of Solar: Sustainability with Every Sip at Cape Cod Coffee

[Read More]

10.13.2022

GrantsREAPRenewable EnergySolar EnergySustainable/Organic Foods

### Gullah Co-op: Growing Food, Preserving Culture   

[Read More]

09.27.2022

African AmericanCooperativesLocal ProduceSustainable/Organic FoodsUnderserved

### Roam Free Ranch Uses USDA To Expand Markets

[Read More]

07.20.2022

BusinessLocal FoodsSmall BusinessSustainable/Organic Foods

### RiverCrest Ranch Finds Community, Opportunity in USDA Grant

[Read More]

03.31.2022

BusinessGrantsSustainable/Organic FoodsLocal FoodsRecreationValue Added

### Claybrook Farms Providing Beef and Jobs

[Read More]

08.06.2019

Sustainable/Organic FoodsLocal FoodsLocal ProduceKnow Your FarmerValue Added

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2