alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-21-1998
<CASH>                                       2,878,166
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      19,783,883
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            13,413,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,070,910
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,287,320
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,328,295
<LOANS>                                    159,927,611
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,223,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             210,908,226
<DEPOSITS>                                 161,135,666
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,699,879
<LONG-TERM>                                 10,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,072,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             210,908,226
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,974,108
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              133,853
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               289,584
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,397,545
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,001,767
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,175,999
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,221,546
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                800,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                546,392
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     546,392
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   344,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.22
<LOANS-NON>                                     74,657
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,223,627
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,223,627
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,223,627
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        316,490
        

</TABLE>
### §2012. Board of directors

Each Farm Credit Bank shall elect a board of directors of such number, for such term, in such manner, and with such qualifications, as may be required in its bylaws, except that, at least one member shall be elected by the other directors, which member shall not be a director, officer, employee, or stockholder of a System institution.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title I, §1.4, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1622; amended Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §401(c), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 995.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2012, Pub. L. 92–181, title I, §1.4, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 584; Pub. L. 96–592, title I, §101, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3437; Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §205(d)(1), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1703; Pub. L. 100–233, title VII, §705(a), title VIII, §802(b), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1706, 1710; Pub. L. 100–399, title VI, §604, Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1006, related to corporate existence and general corporate powers, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 100–233, §401.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–399 struck out "from its voting stockholders" after "shall elect".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–399 effective immediately after amendment made by section 401 of Pub. L. 100–233, which was effective 6 months after Jan. 6, 1988, see section 1001(b) of Pub. L. 100–399, set out as a note under section 2002 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1622, provided that this section is effective 6 months after Jan. 6, 1988.
#### § 100.80 Slate cards and sample ballots.

The payment by a State or local committee of a political party of the costs of preparation, display, or mailing or other distribution incurred by such committee with respect to a printed slate card, sample ballot, palm card, or other printed listing(s) of three or more candidates for any public office for which an election is held in the State in which the committee is organized is not a contribution. The payment of the portion of such costs allocable to Federal candidates must be made from funds subject to the limitations and prohibitions of the Act. If made by a political committee, such payments shall be reported by that committee as disbursements, but need not be allocated in committee reports to specific candidates. This exemption shall not apply to costs incurred by such a committee with respect to the preparation and display of listings made on broadcasting stations, or in newspapers, magazines, and similar types of general public political advertising such as billboards. *But see* 11 CFR 100.24, 104.17(a) and part 300, subpart B for exempt activities that also constitute Federal election activity.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 2314** 

BONITA REDD ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

MCDOWELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Bluefield

. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv
- 02015 )

Submitted : March 18, 2014 Decided: March 24, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Bonita Redd , Appellant Pro Se. Kevin John Robinson , Chip E. Williams , PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC , Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpu blished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Bonita Redd appeals the district court ’ s order
dismissing this action in part pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.
12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim and remanding four state

law claims t o the state court. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Redd v. McDowell Cnty.

Bd. of Educ. , No. 1:13

- cv
- 02015 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 30, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME INCLUDED IN
THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 OF TV GUIDE,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000913061
<NAME>  TV GUIDE, INC. 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         155,516
<SECURITIES>                                     5,804
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,699
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228,021
<PP&E>                                         126,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 403,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,349
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           726
<OTHER-SE>                                     201,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   403,782
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,420
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  350,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                123,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,507
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             64,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    64,777
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
        

</TABLE>
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-38 

December 14, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4211 Withdrawal Liability

4219 Notice & Collection of Withdrawal Liability

4221 Resolution of Disputes 

OPINION: 

 This responds to your letter raising the question of whether officers or shareholders may be held liable for a

corporation's liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), as amended. 

In your letter, and in a subsequent telephone conversation with * * * of this office, you indicated that your company

had made contributions into the Local * * *, * * * Pension and Trust Fund until about a year ago. You also indicated

that your company filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy petition in 1978, that in November 1981 the company's plan of

arrangement was confirmed and that at that time, "union officials accepted a 10% repayment on approximately a $20,000

balance owed to the pension fund." Now you have received a letter from the "union" stating that * * * has incurred

withdrawal liability in the amount of $210,000. You are concerned as to how this amount was reached and as to whether

you or other principals can be held personally liable. 

Under ERISA, any employer that completely or partially withdraws from a multiemployer plan must pay its share

of the plan's [*2] unfunded liability. The exact amount of this contingent liability is determined under ERISA Section

4211. 

Under ERISA, the initial responsibility for determining whether any particular action constitutes a withdrawal from

a multiemployer plan, and the amount of any liability resulting therefrom, lies with the plan. If the plan sponsor makes

such a determination, and if the employer objects, the matter must then be resolved through the dispute resolution

procedures described in Sections 4219 and 4221 of ERISA. 

With regard to your question as to individual shareholder responsibility for withdrawal liability, we note that ERISA

has no special rules regarding shareholder or officer liability. Accordingly, this issue is usually determined by State law,

 which generally provides that shareholders are not liable for the debts of a corporation. You should, however, be

aware that the laws of every state contain exceptions to this general principle. 

If you have any questions on this matter, please contact * * * of this office at (202) 254-4895. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### §5227. Study and report on margin authority

#### (a) Study

The Comptroller General shall undertake a study to determine the extent to which leverage and sudden deleveraging of financial institutions was a factor behind the current financial crisis.

#### (b) Content

The study required by this section shall include—

(1) an analysis of the roles and responsibilities of the Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Secretary, and other Federal banking agencies with respect to monitoring leverage and acting to curtail excessive leveraging;

(2) an analysis of the authority of the Board to regulate leverage, including by setting margin requirements, and what process the Board used to decide whether or not to use its authority;

(3) an analysis of any usage of the margin authority by the Board; and

(4) recommendations for the Board and appropriate committees of Congress with respect to the existing authority of the Board.

#### (c) Report

Not later than June 1, 2009, the Comptroller General shall complete and submit a report on the study required by this section to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives.

#### (d) Sharing of information

Any reports required under this section shall also be submitted to the Congressional Oversight Panel established under section 5233 of this title.

(Pub. L. 110–343, div. A, title I, §117, Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3786.)
**From:** Body, Steve **Sent:** Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:48 PM **To:** 'Spurling, Rebecca'; Rose, Keith **Subject:** RE: Tesoro BART Modeling Protocol v2 (3-28-13) Rebecca... thanks. This V2 of the modeling protocol looks good. Let’s move forward. **From:** Spurling, Rebecca [ mailto:Rebecca.A.Spurling@tsocorp.com ] **Sent:** Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:41 PM **To:** Body, Steve; Rose, Keith **Subject:** Tesoro BART Modeling Protocol v2 (3-28-13) Updated 

### Page 1 of 1

6/24/ 2014 file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Documentum/CTS/docbases/ProDocbase/config/temp_sessions/272538133 ...
### §2806. Compliance improvement methods

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Consultation required

The Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, with the assistance of the Secretary, the Director of the Bureau of the Census, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and such other persons as the Bureau deems appropriate, shall develop or assist in the improvement of, methods of matching addresses and census tracts to facilitate compliance by depository institutions in as economical a manner as possible with the requirements of this chapter.

#### (2) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated, such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subsection.

#### (3) Contracting authority

The Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection is authorized to utilize, contract with, act through, or compensate any person or agency in order to carry out this subsection.

#### (b) Recommendations to Congress

The Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection shall recommend to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives, such additional legislation as the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection deems appropriate to carry out the purpose of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 94–200, title III, §307, as added Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1094(6), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2806, Pub. L. 94–200, title III, §307, Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1127; Pub. L. 100–628, title X, §1087(c), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3280; Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §744(p)(3), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 440, which related to research and improved methods; authorization of appropriations; recommendations to congressional committees, was repealed by Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1094(6), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2101.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §81. Place of business

The general business of each national banking association shall be transacted in the place specified in its organization certificate and in the branch or branches, if any, established or maintained by it in accordance with the provisions of section 36 of this title.

(R.S. §5190; Feb. 25, 1927, ch. 191, §8, 44 Stat. 1229.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5190 derived from act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, §8, 13 Stat. 101, which was the National Bank Act. See section 38 of this title.

#### Amendments

1927—Act Feb. 25, 1927, among other changes, inserted "and in the branch or branches, if any, established or maintained by it in accordance with the provisions of section 36 of this title".
### §2156. Deferment of retirement or separation for medical reasons

(a) Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary may defer the retirement or separation of a commissioned officer, other than a commissioned warrant officer, if the evaluation of the physical condition of the officer and determination of the officer's entitlement to retirement or separation for physical disability require hospitalization, medical observation, or other physical disability processing that cannot be completed before the date on which the officer would otherwise be retired or separated.

(b) A deferment under subsection (a)—

(1) may only be made with the consent of the officer involved; and

(2) if the Secretary receives written notice from the officer withdrawing that consent, shall end not later than the end of the sixty-day period beginning on the date the Secretary receives that notice.

(Added Pub. L. 98–557, §17(b)(2)(A), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2867, §295; renumbered §2156, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §112(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 295 of this title as this section.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

85-5 

January 30, 1985 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4203(b) Complete Withdrawal. Building & Construction Industry Exemption

4212(c) Obligation to Contribute - Liability 

OPINION: 

This responds to your request for the PBGC's opinion concerning the application of the construction industry rule

under Section 4203(b) of ERISA. Specifically, you wish to know whether an employer is liable under that rule when

the employer ceases making contributions to a construction industry pension plan but continues in business performing

all of its construction work through subcontractors. 

Section 4203(b) provides that a construction industry employer that contributes to a construction industry pension

plan does not withdraw from the plan unless the employer "ceases to have an obligation to contribute under the plan, and

. . . continues to perform work in the jurisdiction of the collective bargaining agreement of the type for which

contributions were previously required . . . ." You pose two situations and ask whether they constitute withdrawals. 

First, an employer continues to be obligated to contribute to a plan under a collective bargaining agreement but

ceases to perform construction work directly and thus ceases making contributions to the plan. Rather, [*2] it

subcontracts the work (which may or may not be covered under the plan). Under these circumstances there is no

withdrawal, because the employer has not ceased to have an obligation to contribute for any work that it may perform.

Second, an employer terminates its obligation to contribute and ceases to perform construction work directly. As

above, it subcontracts the work instead. Under these circumstances there is no withdrawal unless the employer would

have been obligated to make contributions for work performed by subcontractors under the terminated agreement. If

contributions would not have been required, there would be no withdrawal, because the employer would not be

continuing to perform work of the type for which contributions were previously required. 

Please note, however, that Section 4212(c) of ERISA provides that a plan may disregard a transaction if a principal

purpose of the transaction is to evade or avoid liability. It is the plan sponsor's responsibility in the first instance to

determine whether a withdrawal has occurred and the identity of the liable employer. Disputes arising over such

withdrawal liability determinations must be resolved under the dispute [*3] resolution procedures of Sections 4219 and

4221 of ERISA. 

I hope this is of assistance. If you have further questions, please contact * * * of my staff at the above address or

(202) 254-4873. 

Thomas Veal 

Acting Director, Legal Department
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50547 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Armando Efrain**

**- Samayoa Salazar,**  Defendant

— Appellant **,**

**consolidated with**

**_____________ No. 21** 

**- 50550** 

**_____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Armando Efrain Samayoa**

**- Salazar,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.** United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 11, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50547 Document: 00516162281 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2022No. 21

- 50547 c/w No. 21

- 50550

2 Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 271

- 1 USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 42

- 1

Before **Wiener, Dennis,** and **Haynes,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * In a consolidated appeal, Armando Efrain Samayoa

- Salazar 1 challenges the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry and a separate judgment revoking the supervised release term imposed in an earlier case. Because his appell ate brief does not address the validity of the revocation or the revocation sentence, Samayoa

- Salazar has abandoned any challenge to the revocation judgment. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993). Samayoa

- Salazar argues for the first time on appeal that the enhancement of his illegal reentry sentence pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)( 2 )

wa s unconstitutional because the fact of his prior conviction was not charged in his indictment or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He concede s that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he wishes to preserve the issue for further review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance or, in the alternative, a motion for an extension of time to file a brief.
We conclude that Samayoa

- Salazar ’s concession of foreclosure is correct, and summary affirmance is appropriate. See United States v. Pervis ,

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4.

1 The text of both of the district court judgments use s this version of the Defendant

Appellant’s name

. Case: 21-50547 Document: 00516162281 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2022No. 21

- 50547 c/w No. 21

- 50550

3 937 F.3d 546, 553

- 54 (5th Cir. 2019) ; Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is **DENIE D AS MOOT**  , and the judgments of the district court are **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-50547 Document: 00516162281 Page: 3 Date Filed: 01/11/2022