alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.31
 Execution Copy
 PURCHASE AND
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
 Agreement Assignor Company Assignee TSA Televisa Internacional Grupo Televisa
 W I T N E S S E T H
 LLC Agreement
 Channel License Agreement Acknowledgment
Agreement
 DTH Parties DTH Agreement Hispanic Tier Puts
  Investment Agreement




---



##### 



Assigned Interest Assignment Purchase Price
   ARTICLE I
  Sale and Assignment
 Purchase and Assumption
  2




---



##### 



CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT: GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. HAS REQUESTED THAT THE OMITTED PORTIONS OF THIS
DOCUMENT, WHICH ARE INDICATED BY ASTERISKS, BE AFFORDED CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT PURSUANT TO RULE
24b-2 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. HAS SEPARATELY FILED THE
OMITTED PORTIONS OF THE DOCUMENT WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Further Agreements with respect to the Assigned Interest Act
 Channel License Agreement and Acknowledgment Agreement
 Continuation of Services
 TuTV Put
 Purchase Price Allocation Proposed Allocation
  3




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
  Organization and Good Standing
 Authorization and Enforceability Bankruptcy Laws
 Non-Contravention
 Ownership
 Sole Representations and Warranties Article II
 ARTICLE III
  Organization and Good Standing
 Authorization and Enforceability
  4




---



##### 



Non-Contravention
 Sole Representations and Warranties Article III
 ARTICLE IV
  Counterparts
 Amendments, Modifications, Waivers
 Governing Law Covered Matters
 Consent to Jurisdiction
  5




---



##### 



Schedule 11.8
 Waiver of Jury Trial.
  Headings
   6




---



##### 



ASSIGNOR:PAY-TV VENTURE, INC.By:

/s/
Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoName:
    Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoTitle:
    Attorney-in-FactBy:

/s/
Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzName:
    Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzTitle:
    Attorney-in-Fact




---



##### 



ASSIGNEE:UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC.By:

/s/
Andrew HobsonName:
    Andrew HobsonTitle:
    Senior Executive Vice President




---



##### 



COMPANY:TUTV LLCBy:

/s/
Rodrigo SalazarName:
    Rodrigo SalazarTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



Solely for purposes of Section 1.5:TELEVISA, S.A. DE C.V.By:

/s/
Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoName:
    Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoTitle:
    Attorney-in-FactBy:
/s/
Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzName:
    Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzTitle:
    Attorney-in-FactTELEVISA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. DE C.V.By:
/s/
Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoName:
    Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoTitle:
    Attorney-in-FactBy:

/s/
Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzName:
    Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzTitle:
    Attorney-in-FactSolely for purposes of Section 1.6:GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B.By:

/s/
Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoName:
    Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoTitle:
    Attorney-in-FactBy:

/s/
Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzName:
    Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzTitle:
    Attorney-in-Fact
# C_2006326EN.01003103.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/31

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma de País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 18 October 2006 — Comunidad Autónoma de la Rioja v Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa, Juntas Generales de Guipúzcoa, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

(Case C-431/06)

(2006/C 326/65)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma de País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Comunidad Autónoma de la Rioja

Applicant:

Defendants: Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa, Juntas Generales de Guipúzcoa, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

Defendants:

Question referred

Must Article 87(1) EC be construed as meaning that, by providing for a rate of tax lower than the basic rate set in Spanish State legislation and for a deduction from the amount of tax payable which does not exist in State tax legislation, provisions in the field of taxation adopted by the Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Gipuzkoa amending Articles 29(1)(a) and 37 of the Provincial Law on Company Tax, which take effect in the jurisdiction of that infra-State autonomous body, must be regarded as selective and as covered by the definition of State aid enshrined in Article 87(1) EC and, accordingly, must be notified to the Commission pursuant to Article 88(3) EC?

---
# C_2006326EN.01008802.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/88

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 November 2006 — Andersson and Others v Commission

(Case F-69/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 326/178)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 12.8.2006, p. 35.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

T. B.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 189 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
|  | HTML Format  	- September 1998
- March 1998
- September 1997
- September 1996
- June 1996
- January 1996

Text-Only Format- September 1998
- March 1998
- September 1997
- September 1996
- June 1996
- January 1996
Search | NIAID   Home | Publications*Last Updated September 1, 1999 (hrs).* |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Sally J. Smith,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  August 4, 2010

 
|   | By:    | /s/  Sally J. Smith      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Sally  J. Smith          |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
### §3717. Regulations

The Secretary is authorized to issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title III, §369I, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 431.)
#### § 116.7 Test records.

Detailed records of all tests conducted on each serial and each subserial shall be maintained by the licensee. Summaries of such tests shall be prepared from such records and submitted to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service using APHIS Form 2008 or an acceptable equivalent form prior to release of the serial or subserial. Blank forms for such summaries shall be available from Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service upon request.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0013)

[39 FR 16872, May 10, 1974, as amended at 48 FR 57473, Dec. 30, 1983; 56 FR 66784, Dec. 26, 1991; 61 FR 52874, Oct. 9, 1996]
#### § 20.207 Can a tribe use savings from a tribal redesign plan to meet other priorities of the tribe?

Yes, you may use savings from a redesign of the general assistance program to meet other priorities.
### §4245. Counterclaims

Any counterclaim filed in any action brought on behalf of the United States by private counsel retained under section 4241 of this title may not be asserted unless the counterclaim has been served directly on the Attorney General and the United States Attorney for the judicial district in which, or embracing the place in which, the action is pending. Such service shall be made in accordance with the rules of procedure of the court in which the action on behalf of the United States is pending.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2592, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4906.)
### §§932, 933. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 932, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §26, 39 Stat. 380, covered joint-stock land banks and limitations on state taxation of shares thereof.

Section 933, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §26, 39 Stat. 380; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, prohibited a construction of statute which might serve to render exempt real property of land banks and land bank associations from state, county, or municipal taxes.
# OAR Box 1828

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 247 ) ll-K - (I ) -6 0 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7 p. i

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57

AM Sheet 247 of 325P. 2

ENERGYSCENARI O COMPARISON . EEA , Inc . 

# /AU$ 1 II-K-(I)-6 0

Jun e 10 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-6 0
#### § 11.9 Collection in installments.

DHS may accept payment of a DHS debt in regular installments, in accordance with the provisions of 31 CFR 901.8 and policies and procedures adopted by the Chief Financial Officer (CFO). The CFO will consult the Office of General Counsel regarding a legally enforceable written agreement from the debtor.
### §9285. Medal of honor: presentation of Medal of Honor Flag

The President shall provide for the presentation of the Medal of Honor Flag designated under section 903 of title 36 to each person to whom a medal of honor is awarded under section 9271 of this title. Presentation of the flag shall be made at the same time as the presentation of the medal under section 9271 or 9282(a) of this title. In the case of a posthumous presentation of the medal, the flag shall be presented to the person to whom the medal is presented.

(Added Pub. L. 107–248, title VIII, §8143(c)(3)(A), Oct. 23, 2002, 116 Stat. 1570, §8755; amended Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title X, §1062(a)(16), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2650; Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title V, §555(a), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2217; renumbered §9285 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§806(b)(11), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, 1840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8755 of this title as this section and substituted "section 9271" for "section 8741" and "section 9271 or 9282(a)" for "section 8741 or 8752(a)".

2006—Pub. L. 109–364 struck out "after October 23, 2002" after "section 8741 of this title" and inserted at end "In the case of a posthumous presentation of the medal, the flag shall be presented to the person to whom the medal is presented."

2002—Pub. L. 107–314 substituted "October 23, 2002" for "the date of the enactment of this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Presentation of Flag for Prior Recipients of Medal of Honor

President to provide for the presentation of the Medal of Honor Flag to living recipients of the Medal of Honor as expeditiously as possible after Oct. 17, 2006, and for posthumous presentation to survivors of deceased recipients upon written application therefor, see section 555(b) of Pub. L. 109–364, set out as a note under section 7285 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6395

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. ROBERT EARL MARSHALL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, SeniorDistrict Judge. (3:99-cr-00037-RLW; 3:01-cv-00129-RLW; 3:03-cv00844-RLW; 3:08-cv-00103-RLW) Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Earl Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, S. David Schiller, Michael Cornell Wallace, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Earl Marshall seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Marshall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Marshall’s notice of appeal and motion for a certificate of appealability as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a- 3 - prisoner must assert claimsbased on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Marshall’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
puredepth_8k-ex1033.htm


     

    EXHIBIT
10.33

     

    
      PureDepth
Incorporated Limited

      


      


      


      Kristin
Bowman

      12 Patey
Street

      Remuera

      Auckland

      


      


      June
5,  2008

      


      


      Dear
Kristin

      


      VARIATION
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      


      The
purpose of this letter is to record the terms of our agreement regarding your
staged resignation as an employee of PureDepth Incorporated Limited
("PDIL").

      


      The terms
in this letter vary, as necessary, the terms of the Individual Employment
Agreement dated 31 March 2005 between you and PDIL ("Employment
Agreement").

      


      We have
agreed to the following terms:

      


      
        	
                1.

              	
                You
      have resigned your position with PDIL, effective 14 June
      2008.  PDIL and you agree that the notice period set out in your
      Employment Agreement will not
apply.

              


      

      


      
        	
                2.

              	
                From
      17 April 2008 to 14 June 2008, you agree to take 4 days annual leave per
      week, until your annual leave is
exhausted.

              


      

      


      
        	
                3.

              	
                From
      17 April 2008 to 14 June 2008,
      you will work for the equivalent of 1 day per week.  For the
      avoidance of doubt, PDIL and you agree that you may work the equivalent of
      one day (8 hours), over several days of each
  week.

              


      

      


      
        	
                4.

              	
                From
      17 April 2008 to 14 June 2008,
      you will be paid at the rate of one-fifth (1/5th) of your current salary
      ($257,000 per annum), on a weekly
basis.

              


      

      


      
        	
                5.

              	
                You
      will continue to act as a director of PureDepth Limited, PureDepth
      Incorporated Limited and PureDepth, Inc. until you resign from those
      directorships or are removed as a director in accordance with relevant
      laws and constitutional documents pertaining to each of those
      companies.

              


      

      


      As the
terms set out in this letter constitute a variation to your Employment
Agreement, you have the right to seek independent advice about these
terms.  If you agree to all of these terms, please sign
below.

      


      


      Yours
faithfully


      


      


      


      Jonathan
J. McCaman

      PureDepth
Incorporated Limited

      


      I agree
to the Variation of my Employment Agreement, as set out in this
letter.  I confirm that I have had the opportunity to take independent
advice about the terms of this Variation.

      


      


      
        	__________________________________ 	__________________ 
	
                Kristin
      Bowman

              	
                Date
§ 3.152 Facilities, outdoor. ( a ) *Acclimation.* Birds may not be housed in outdoor facilities unless the air humidity and temperature ranges and, if applicable, pool or other aquatic area (*e.g.,* ponds, waterfalls, fountains, and other water features) temperature ranges do not adversely affect bird health and comfort. Birds may not be introduced to an outdoor housing facility until they are acclimated to the ambient temperature and humidity and, if applicable, pool or other aquatic area temperature range which they will encounter therein.
( b ) *Shelter from inclement weather.* Outdoor housing facilities must provide adequate shelter, appropriate to the species and physical condition of the birds, for the local climatic conditions to protect the birds from any adverse weather conditions. Shelters must be adequately ventilated in hot weather and have one or more separate areas of shade or other effective protection that is large enough to comfortably contain all the birds at one time and prevent their discomfort from direct sunlight, precipitation, or wind. Shelter must also be constructed to provide sufficient space to comfortably hold all of the birds at the same time without adverse intraspecific aggression or grouping of incompatible birds. For birds that form dominance hierarchies and that are maintained in social groupings, shelter(s) must be constructed so as to provide sufficient space to comfortably hold all the birds at the same time, including birds that are low in the hierarchy.
-  Home 
-  Newsroom 

# In This Section

                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Reports to Congress 
                      -  Congressional Testimony 
                      -  Speeches 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Transporting Infectious Substances                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Safety Advisory Notice: Classification of MPXV Diagnostic Samples and Waste                   

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Safety Advisory Notice: Classification of Monkeypox Diagnostic Samples and Waste

PHMSA's **Safety Advisory Notice** shares new advice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regarding diagnostic samples and clinical waste containing Monkeypox virus (MPXV) in Clade I or II. The advice clarifies that samples and clinical waste should be designated as Category B infectious substances except when they contain or are contaminated with cultures of Clade I MPXV. 

Access the advisory in the related documents section for full details.
#### Edward M. Tyrrell, Appellant, v. Long Island City, Respondent.

Orders affirmed on reargument, with costs, on the authority of *Burke*v. *Baker*(104 App. Div. 26). Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Miller, JJ., concurred.
#### § 117.5 Segregation of animals.

Animals which have been infected with or exposed to a dangerous, infectious, contagious, or communicable disease shall be kept effectively segregated at a licensed establishment until such time as they are humanely destroyed or successfully treated and removed as healthy animals.
### §2125. Dividends

Dividends may be payable only on nonvoting investment stock, if declared by the board of directors of the bank, subject to the general direction of the Farm Credit Administration.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title III, §3.4, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 604; Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §205(e)(5), title VI, §606, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1705, 1711; Pub. L. 100–233, title VIII, §805(l), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1715.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–233 struck out "other than stock held by the Farm Credit Administration," after "investment stock,".

1985—Pub. L. 99–205 struck out "the Governor of" before "the Farm Credit Administration" and inserted ", subject to the general direction of the Farm Credit Administration".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–205 effective thirty days after Dec. 23, 1985, see section 401 of Pub. L. 99–205, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00718- CR NO. 03-05-00719- CR Tam m y J o G ut hr ie , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D -1-DC -05-30 1097 & D -1-DC -05-30 1102 HO NORAB LE WILF ORD F LOW ERS, JUDGE PRESI DING M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N On Se pte mbe r 15 , 20 05 , Tammy Jo Guthr ie wa s a dju dg e d guil ty of c re dit c ard a bu se afte r plea ding guilty

in cause number D- 1-DC-05-301097. The court imposed a 365-da y jail term as ca lled fo r i n a plea barg ain agree ment. On Guthrie’ s motion, t he cour t considere d her unadjudicate d cre dit card a buse off ense in ca u se number D -1-DC-05- 301102 in assessing punishment. SeeTex. P en. C ode Ann. § 12.45 (West 2003). Guthrie filed pr o se notices of appea l in both cause numbe rs on Novembe r 1, 2005.

The notices of appe al wer e untimely . Tex. R. App. P . 26.2(a) (1). In addition, the trial court ha s cer

tified that these are plea barg ain case s and Guthrie ha s no rig ht of appe al. SeeTe x. R. App. P. 25.2(a)( 2), (d) .2 The a ppeals a re dismissed.

__________________________________________

David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P atterson a nd Pury ear Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Nove mber 22, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh