alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**BENJAMIN WEEMS KING**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM RETIRED STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 47 DB 2016 (No. 55 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 50249** 

**(Out of State)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29 th**  **day of July, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of Disciplinary Board Member dated July 15, 2016, is appro**  **ved and it is ORDERED that Benjamin Weems King, who has been on Retired Status, h**  **as never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral**  **qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in**  **the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Ba**  **r of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and**  **processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.** 

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
# CA2006181EN.01003101.xml

| 3.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 181/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 181/31

---

RESERVE LISTS

   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

(1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/22/05

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/22/05

HEADS OF UNIT (A*12)

HEADS OF UNIT (A*12)

of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovenian and Slovakian citizenship

(2006/C 181 A/08)

Field 1:

Internal market

| ERDOS | Mihaly |
| --- | --- |
| GRAJEK | Mariusz |
| KOPERDAK | Sergej |
| LOIZIDES | Dimis |
| MAZEIKA | Renatas |
| MELNIKOVA | Tanya |
| NARAI | Istvan |
| PINKOWSKI | Jakub |
| STANCIKAS | Alvydas |

ERDOS

Mihaly

GRAJEK

Mariusz

KOPERDAK

Sergej

LOIZIDES

Dimis

MAZEIKA

Renatas

MELNIKOVA

Tanya

NARAI

Istvan

PINKOWSKI

Jakub

STANCIKAS

Alvydas

Field 2:

External relations

Merit group 1:

| CHRENEK | Dusan |
| --- | --- |
| GATI | Anna |
| KOLECKA | Beata |
| KOVACS | Peter |
| UUSTALU | Ann |

CHRENEK

Dusan

GATI

Anna

KOLECKA

Beata

KOVACS

Peter

UUSTALU

Ann

Merit group 2:

| LUBOWIECKI | Wojciech |
| --- | --- |
| SIENCZEWSKI | Jan-Artu |

LUBOWIECKI

Wojciech

SIENCZEWSKI

Jan-Artu

Field 3:

Management of research programmes

| JIRSA | Pavel |
| --- | --- |
| KRAL | Libor |
| MALEKOS | Ioannis |
| NAGY GABOR | Mihaly |
| PIETRZAK | Tomasz |
| SKEREN | Teodor |
| TORK | Hillar |
| URBANEK | Pavel |

JIRSA

Pavel

KRAL

Libor

MALEKOS

Ioannis

NAGY GABOR

Mihaly

PIETRZAK

Tomasz

SKEREN

Teodor

TORK

Hillar

URBANEK

Pavel

Field 4:

Management of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund

Merit group 1:

| CONSTANTINOU | Costas |
| --- | --- |
| HOLLAI | Imre |
| ROZSA | Judit |
| WAJSMAN | Nathan |

CONSTANTINOU

Costas

HOLLAI

Imre

ROZSA

Judit

WAJSMAN

Nathan

Merit group 2:

| JENKO | Gorazd |
| --- | --- |
| MIGAS | Mariusz Stefan |
| MOOZ | Petr |
| SLABY | Martin |

JENKO

Gorazd

MIGAS

Mariusz Stefan

MOOZ

Petr

SLABY

Martin

Field 5:

Management of sustainable resources

| DEMETER | Andras |
| --- | --- |
| NEMESKERI | Robert |

DEMETER

Andras

NEMESKERI

Robert

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2007 and may be extended.

31 December 2007

---

(1)  The name of a successful candidate will not appear on this list if already requested.

1

---
H. Res. 411

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 1, 2000.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is

hereby, elected to the following standing Committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON BANKING: Ms. Lee of California to rank

immediately after Mr. Meeks of New York.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 581 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 277
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 581

                          [Report No. 106-866]

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3986) to provide for 
 a study of the engineering feasibility of a water exchange in lieu of 
electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, 
                              Washington.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2000

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3986) to provide for 
 a study of the engineering feasibility of a water exchange in lieu of 
electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, 
                              Washington.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 3986) to provide for a study of the engineering 
feasibility of a water exchange in lieu of electrification of the 
Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, Washington. The bill 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by 
the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill shall be considered 
as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except 
one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources and one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 277

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 581

                          [Report No. 106-866]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3986) to provide for 
 a study of the engineering feasibility of a water exchange in lieu of 
electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, 
                              Washington.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 19, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
## SUBTITLE IV—COAST GUARD AUTHORIZATIONS AND REPORTS TO CONGRESS

Chap.
Sec.
49.
Authorizations
4901
51.
Reports
5101

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §121(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4238, inserted subtitle IV designation and heading and added items for chapters 49 and 51.
# C_2007056EN.01002201.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/22

---

Action brought on 18 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union

(Case C-13/07)

(2007/C 56/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P.J. Kuijper and M. Huttunen, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Council and the Member States establishing the Community's and the Member States' position within the General Council of the World Trade Organization on the accession of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam to the World Trade Organization (COM/2005/0659 final-ACC 2006/0215); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Council and the Member States establishing the Community's and the Member States' position within the General Council of the World Trade Organization on the accession of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam to the World Trade Organization (COM/2005/0659 final-ACC 2006/0215);

| — | declare that the effects of the annulled decision are definitive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the effects of the annulled decision are definitive;

| — | order Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The proposal submitted by the Commission was based on article 133, paragraphs 1 and 5 of the EC Treaty in conjunction with the second subparagraph of article 300(2) thereof. The Council added article 133(6) to the legal basis and consequently a formally separate decision of the Representatives of the Governments of Member States meeting within the Council was adopted. Thus, the Council and the Member States adopted ‘jointly’ the position of the Community and its Member States as foreseen by the last sentence of article 133(6), second subparagraph.

The Commission's choice of the legal basis was decided according to the parameters established by the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, which are the aim and the content of the act. In particular, it was based on the appreciation that the content of the act falls within article 133(1) and (5), which establishes an exclusive competence, and that consequently recourse to article 133(6) was not necessary. The Commission believes that the decision should be annulled as far as this aspect of its legal basis is concerned.

---
#### § 304.3 Classifying and marking of silver.

For the present the Indian Arts and Crafts Board reserves to itself the sole right to judge what silver complying with its standards shall bear the Government mark. All such marking of silver shall, for the present, be done by an agent of the Indian Arts and Crafts Board.
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cobalt Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|By: | /s/STEPHEN E. BABLITCHStephen E. Bablitch
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer               |  | 
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: | /s/GAIL L. HANSONGail L. Hanson
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

Date:
August 12, 2003

---

QuickLinks
§ 9409.4 Production or disclosure prohibited unless approved by appropriate Commission official. ( a ) No employee or former employee of the Commission shall, in response to a demand of a court or other authority, produce a record or disclose any information relating to any record of the Commission, or disclose any information or produce any material acquired as part of the performance of his official duties or because of his official status without the prior, written approval of the General Counsel of the Commission.
( b ) Any expert or opinion testimony by a former employee of the Commission shall be excepted from the requirements of this part where the testimony involves only general expertise gained while employed at the Commission.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-2

                          CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST
                        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
               TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                 ----------------------------------------------------
                                                   1999       1998       1997       1996       1995
                                                 --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                              <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Available earnings:
  Net income...................................  $48,760    $32,248    $27,260    $14,941    $ 8,212
  Add interest expense (1).....................   21,859     15,476     10,871     10,992     12,985
                                                 -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
Available earnings (2).........................  $70,619    $47,724    $38,131    $25,933    $21,197
                                                 =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Combined fixed charges:
  Interest expense.............................  $21,859    $15,476    $10,871    $10,992    $12,985
  Capitalized interest.........................    1,926      2,214        893        142         20
  Preferred dividends..........................    8,318      6,360        901        947      1,002
                                                 -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
Total fixed charges............................  $32,103    $24,050    $12,665    $12,081    $14,007
                                                 =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges....     2.20       1.98       3.01       2.15       1.51
                                                 =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>

------------------------

NOTES:

(1) Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing costs.

(2) Interest portion of rental expense is not calculated because annual rental
    expense for the Company is not significant.

                                      F-37
### §3048. Cooperation with Federal agencies offering programs for consumer cooperatives in disseminating information

The Office shall work closely with all United States Government agencies offering programs for which consumer cooperatives may be eligible to assure that information concerning all such programs is made available to eligible cooperatives.

(Pub. L. 95–351, title II, §208, Aug. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 513.)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFINTERIM PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

James R. Gibson,the Interim Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer ofAffymetrix, Inc. certifies that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Affymetrix, Inc.
| March 1, 2007 | /s/ JAMES R. GIBSON |
|--------------------|---------------------|
|               | Name:               | James R. Gibson |
|               | Title:              | *Interim Principal Financial Officer and*

*Principal Accounting Officer* |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 576 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 576

 Supporting efforts to increase childhood cancer awareness, treatment, 
                             and research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2000

  Ms. Pryce of Ohio (for herself and Mr. Hall of Ohio) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting efforts to increase childhood cancer awareness, treatment, 
                             and research.

Whereas an estimated 12,400 children will be diagnosed with cancer in the year 
        2000;
Whereas cancer is the leading cause of death by disease in children under age 
        15;
Whereas an estimated 2,300 children will die from cancer in the year 2000;
Whereas the incidence of cancer among children in the United States is rising by 
        about one percent each year;
Whereas 1 in every 330 Americans develops cancer before age 20;
Whereas approximately 8 percent of deaths of those between 1 and 19 years old 
        are caused by cancer;
Whereas a number of opportunities for childhood cancer research remain unfunded 
        or underfunded;
Whereas limited resources for childhood cancer research hinder the recruitment 
        of investigators and physicians to pediatric oncology;
Whereas peer-reviewed clinical trials are the standard of care for pediatrics 
        and have improved cancer survival rates among children; and
Whereas a recent study indicates that, based on parental reports, 89 percent of 
        children with cancer experienced substantial suffering in the last month 
        of life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
Congress should support--
            (1) public and private sector efforts to promote awareness 
        about the incidence of cancer among children, the signs and 
        symptoms of cancer in children, and treatment options;
            (2) increased public and private investment in childhood 
        cancer research to improve prevention, diagnosis, treatment, 
        and long-term survival;
            (3) policies that provide incentives to encourage medical 
        trainees and investigators to enter the field of pediatric 
        oncology;
            (4) policies that provide incentives to encourage the 
        development of drugs and biologics designed to treat pediatric 
        cancers;
            (5) policies that encourage participation in clinical 
        trials; and
            (6) medical education curricula designed to improve pain 
        management for cancer patients.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet of CNL Income Fund XV, Ltd. at December 31, 1996, and its
statement of income for the year then ended and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the Form 10-K of CNL Income Fund XV, Ltd. for the
year ended December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,536,163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      22,946,739
<DEPRECIATION>                                 556,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,936,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,988,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,936,678
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,675,748
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  483,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,585,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,585,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,585,059
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XV, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for
current assets and current liabilities.
<F2>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XV, LTD has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007056EN.01001302.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social Único de Algeciras (Spain) lodged on 7 December 2006 — Maira María Robledillo Núñez v Fondo de Garantía Salarial (‘FOGASA’)

(Case C-498/06)

(2007/C 56/23)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social Único de Algeciras

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Maira María Robledillo Núñez

Applicant:

Defendant: Fondo de Garantía Salarial (‘FOGASA’)

Defendant:

Question referred

Having regard to the general principle of equality and non-discrimination, is there no objective justification for the difference in treatment created by Article 33.2 of the Workers' Statute and, consequently, must compensation for dismissal payable to an employee pursuant to extra-judicial conciliation be included in the ambit of Council Directive 80/987/EEC (1) on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, in the version amended by Directive 2002/74/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002, given that Article 33.1 of the Workers' Statute recognises this type of conciliation in relation to the payment by the guarantee institution of the ‘salarios de tramitación’ which also arise from the dismissal?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 283, 1980, p. 23; EE 05/02, p. 219.

1

(2)  OJ L 270, 2002, p. 10.

2

---
### §4144. Grants for other purposes

The Secretary may provide grants under this subchapter—

(1) to resident-controlled or community-based nonprofit organizations with experience in resident education and organizing for the purpose of conducting community, city or county wide outreach and training programs to identify and organize residents of eligible low-income housing; and

(2) to State and local government agencies and nonprofit intermediaries for the purpose of carrying out such activities as the Secretary deems appropriate to further the preservation program established under this title.1

(Pub. L. 100–242, title II, §254, as added Pub. L. 102–550, title III, §312, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3767.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in par. (2), means title II of Pub. L. 100–242, as amended by Pub. L. 101–625, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4249, known as the Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of this title and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.