alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2279aa–1. Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation

#### (a) Establishment

#### (1) In general

There is hereby established a corporation to be known as the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, which shall be a federally chartered instrumentality of the United States.

#### (2) Institution within Farm Credit System

The Corporation shall be an institution of the Farm Credit System.

#### (3) Liability

#### (A) Corporation

The Corporation shall not be liable for any debt or obligation of any other institution of the Farm Credit System.

#### (B) System institutions

The Farm Credit System and System institutions (other than the Corporation) shall not be liable for any debt or obligation of the Corporation.

#### (b) Duties

The Corporation shall—

(1) in consultation with originators, develop uniform underwriting, security appraisal, and repayment standards for qualified loans;

(2) determine the eligibility of agricultural mortgage marketing facilities to contract with the Corporation for the provision of guarantees for specific mortgage pools;

(3) provide guarantees for the timely repayment of principal and interest on securities representing interests in, or obligations backed by, pools of qualified loans; and

(4) purchase qualified loans and issue securities representing interests in, or obligations backed by, the qualified loans, guaranteed for the timely repayment of principal and interest.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title VIII, §8.1, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title VII, §702, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1687; amended Pub. L. 104–105, title I, §103, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 163.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 104–105 added par. (4).
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00384-CV

BRENDA COMBES AND TOM 

COMBES

APPELLANTS

V.

TARSEM GILL APPELLEE 

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

We have considered “Appellants’ Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice.” It is 

the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted. Therefore, we lift the stay 

entered on January 3, 2014, and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PANEL: MEIER, MCCOY, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 30, 2014
|     |                                                                                        |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [ ] | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |

|     |                                                                                                        |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [ ] | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |

|     |                                                                                                        |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [ ] | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |  |
| Date:  January 15, 2014 |   |   | PLEXUS CORP. |
|                    |   |   | (Registrant) |
|                    |   |   |   |
|                    |   | By: | /s/ Ginger M. Jones      |
|                    |   |   | Ginger M. Jones |
|                    |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
§ 3.139 Food and water requirements. ( a ) All live animals shall be offered potable water within 4 hours prior to being transported in commerce. Dealers, exhibitors, research facilities and operators of auction sales shall provide potable water to all live animals transported in their own primary conveyance at least every 12 hours after such transportation is initiated, and carriers and intermediate handlers shall provide potable water to all live animals at least every 12 hours after acceptance for transportation in commerce: *Provided, however,* That except as directed by hibernation, veterinary treatment or other professionally accepted practices, those live animals which, by common accepted practices, require watering more frequently shall be so watered.
( b ) Each live animal shall be fed at least once in each 24 hour period, except as directed by hibernation, veterinary treatment, normal fasts, or other professionally accepted practices. Those live animals which, by common accepted practice, require feeding more frequently shall be so fed.
( c ) A sufficient quantity of food and water shall accompany the live animal to provide food and water for such animals for a period of at least 24 hours, except as directed by hibernation, veterinary treatment, normal fasts, and other professionally accepted practices.
( d ) Any dealer, research facility, exhibitor or operator of an auction sale offering any live animal to any carrier or intermediate handler for transportation in commerce shall affix to the outside of the primary enclosure used for transporting such live animal, written instructions concerning the food and water requirements of such animal while being so transported.
( e ) No carrier or intermediate handler shall accept any live animals for transportation in commerce unless written instructions concerning the food and water requirements of such animal while being so transported is affixed to the outside of its primary enclosure.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40065

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FERNANDO ROSAS-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:08-CR-644-1

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando RosasLopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rosas-Lopez has filed a response.

The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of

Rosas-Lopez’s’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally

“cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [it has] not been raised before the

district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-40065

2

the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006)

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the

record, counsel’s brief, and Rosas-Lopez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

Rosas-Lopez’s motion to proceed pro se and for the Anders brief to be

stricken are DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th

Cir. 1998).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsControlling Tensegrity Robots through Evolution using Friction based ActuationTraditional robotic structures have limitations in planetary exploration as their rigid structural joints are prone to damage in new and rough terrains. In contrast, robots based on tensegrity structures, composed of rods and tensile cables, offer a highly robust, lightweight, and energy efficient solution over traditional robots. In addition tensegrity robots can be highly configurable by rearranging their topology of rods, cables and motors. However, these highly configurable tensegrity robots pose a significant challenge for locomotion due to their complexity. This study investigates a control pattern for successful locomotion in tensegrity robots through an evolutionary algorithm. A twelve-rod hardware model is rapidly prototyped to utilize a new actuation method based on friction. A web-based physics simulation is created to model the twelve-rod tensegrity ball structure. Square-waves are used as control policies for the actuators of the tensegrity structure. Monte Carlo trials are run to find the most successful number of amplitudes for the square-wave control policy. From the results, an evolutionary algorithm is implemented to find the most optimized solution for locomotion of the twelve-rod tensegrity structure. The software pattern coupled with the new friction based actuation method can serve as the basis for highly efficient tensegrity robots in space exploration.Document ID20180000394Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKothapalli, Tejasvi*(Lynbrook High School San Jose, CA, United States)*Agogino, Adrian K.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 16, 2018Publication DateDecember 1, 2017Subject CategoryCybernetics, Artificial Intelligence And RoboticsReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN47690NASA/TM-2017-219718Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 920121.01.02.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightUse by or on behalf of the US Gov. Permitted.KeywordsTensegritAvailable DownloadsNameType20180000394.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4407

_____________________________

ADRIAN B. WYNN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

January 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Adrian B. Wynn, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Anne Conley, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Parts 1, 20, and 43
          - [WCB: WC Docket Nos. 07-38, 09-190, 10-132, 11-10; FCC 11-14]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 28, 2011, a document concerning modernization of the FCC Form 477. Inadvertently the Comment Filing Procedures section of the February 28, 2011 publication mistakenly references WC Docket No. 10-191. This document removes that incorrect reference and replaces it with the correct docket number in this proceeding, WC Docket No. 11-10.                    

# DATES:

Effective on March 7, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeremy Miller, 202-418-1507.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Communications Commission published a document (FR Doc. 2011-4393) in the                     **Federal Register**                     of February 28, 2011 (76 FR 10827) relating to the modernization of the FCC Form 477. The document (FR Doc. 2011-4393), published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of February 28, 2011 (76 FR 10827), mistakenly references WC Docket No. 10-191. This correction removes the reference to WC Docket No. 10-191 published on February 28, 2011, and replaces it with the correct WC Docket No. 11-10.                

In FR Doc. 2011-4393, published on February 28, 2011 (76 FR 10827), make the following correction: on page 10842, in the third column, paragraph 118, replace reference to WC Docket No.10-191 with the correct docket number in this proceeding, WC Docket No. 11-10.

Dated: February 28, 2011.

Federal Communications Commission.

Bulah P. Wheeler,

Deputy Manager.

[FR Doc. 2011-5095 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Peay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Black Diamond, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Black Diamond, Inc.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  March 15, 2011


By: /s/  Robert PeayName: Robert PeayTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
#### § 9002.15 Political party.

*Political party* means an association, committee, or organization which nominates or selects an individual for election to any Federal office, including the office of President or Vice President of the United States, whose name appears on the general election ballot as the candidate of such association, committee, or organization.
Enclosure to Boeing Letter

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-12-0332 Page 1 of 4Enclosure to Boeing Letter

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-12-0332 Page 2 of 4Enclosure to Boeing Letter

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-12-0332 Page 3 of 4Enclosure to Boeing Letter

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-12-0332 Page 4 of 4
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.183 Do Indian tribes and tribal organizations need to be aware of areas which FTCA does not cover? Yes. There are claims against self-determination contractors which are not covered by FTCA, claims which may not be pursued under FTCA, and remedies that are excluded by FTCA. General guidance is provided below as to these matters but is not intended as a definitive description of coverage, which is subject to review by the Department of Justice and the courts on a case-by-case basis. ( a ) *What claims are expressly barred by FTCA and therefore may not be made against the United States, an Indian tribe or tribal organization?* Any claim under 28 U.S.C. 2680, including claims arising out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights, unless otherwise authorized by 28 U.S.C. 2680(h).
( b ) *What claims may not be pursued under FTCA?* ( 1 ) Except as provided in §§ 900.181(a)(1) and 900.189, claims against subcontractors arising out of the performance of subcontracts with a self-determination contractor;
( 2 ) Claims for on-the-job injuries which are covered by workmen's compensation;
( 3 ) Claims for breach of contract rather than tort claims; or
( 4 ) Claims resulting from activities performed by an employee which are outside the scope of employment.
( c ) *What remedies are expressly excluded by FTCA and therefore are barred?* ( 1 ) Punitive damages, unless otherwise authorized by 28 U.S.C. 2674; and
( 2 ) Other remedies not permitted under applicable state law.
### §247a. Records of action on policy relating to open-market operation and policies determined generally; inclusion in report to Congress

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall keep a complete record of the action taken by the Board and by the Federal Open Market Committee upon all questions of policy relating to open-market operations and shall record therein the votes taken in connection with the determination of open-market policies and the reasons underlying the action of the Board and the Committee in each instance. The Board shall keep a similar record with respect to all questions of policy determined by the Board, and shall include in its annual report to the Congress a full account of the action so taken during the preceding year with respect to open-market policies and operations and with respect to the policies determined by it and shall include in such report a copy of the records required to be kept under the provisions of this section.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §10 (par.), as added Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(d), 49 Stat. 705.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of tenth par. of section 10 of act Dec. 23, 1913, as added Aug. 23, 1935. For classification to this title of other pars. of section 10, see Codification note set out under section 241 of this title.
#### Gracie *v.*Maryland Insurance Company.

Marshall, Ch. J.

This case differs from that against the Marine Insurance Company of Baltimore only in one particular. A part of the cargo remained on board the ship, until the arrival of the French troops, when the departure of the vessel was prohibited by the general, and the ransom made. This circumstance does not, in the opinion of the court, vary the case ; because, omitting all other considerations, the loss, within the risk, being on only a part of the cargo, is a partial loss, and is affected by the warranty against particular average loss. This judgment is also to be affirmed, with costs.

Judgment affirmed.
### §§1749 to 1749c. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–498, title VII, §702, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1545

Section 1749, acts Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title IV, §401, 64 Stat. 77; June 30, 1953, ch. 170, §24(b), 67 Stat. 128; Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title VIII, §808(b), 68 Stat. 646; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title III, §301, 69 Stat. 644; Aug. 7, 1956, ch. 1029, title VI, §601, 70 Stat. 1113; July 12, 1957, Pub. L. 85–104, title VI, §601(a), 71 Stat. 303; Sept. 23, 1959, Pub. L. 86–372, title VI, §§601, 603(b), 73 Stat. 681, 682; Sept. 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–788, §2(b), 74 Stat. 1028; June 30, 1961, Pub. L. 87–70, title IV, §401, 75 Stat. 172; Aug. 10, 1965, Pub. L. 89–117, title VI, §§601, 602, 604(b), 79 Stat. 489; May 24, 1966, Pub. L. 89–429, §3(b), 80 Stat. 166; Nov. 3, 1966, Pub. L. 89–754, title X, §1014(b), 80 Stat. 1292; May 25, 1967, Pub. L. 90–19, §8(a), 81 Stat. 22; Aug. 1, 1968, Pub. L. 90–448, title XVII, §1705(b)–(e), (g)(1), 82 Stat. 604, 605; Dec. 24, 1969, Pub. L. 91–152, title II, §219, 83 Stat. 390; July 24, 1970, Pub. L. 91–351, title VII, §710, 84 Stat. 463; Dec. 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–609, title II, §205, 84 Stat. 1777; Oct. 17, 1984, Pub. L. 98–479, title II, §203(e)(1), 98 Stat. 2230, authorized Federal loans and grants to assist educational institutions in providing housing and other educational facilities for students and faculties.

Section 1749a, acts Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title IV, §402, 64 Stat. 78; Sept. 23, 1959, Pub. L. 86–372, title VI, §602, 73 Stat. 681; May 25, 1967, Pub. L. 90–19, §8(a), (b), 81 Stat. 22; Jan. 2, 1975, Pub. L. 93–604, title VII, §705(b), 88 Stat. 1964; Oct. 31, 1983, Pub. L. 98–139, title III, §308, 97 Stat. 895; Oct. 17, 1984, Pub. L. 98–479, title II, §§201(d)(1), 203(e)(2)–(4), 204(d), 98 Stat. 2228, 2230, 2233; Nov. 8, 1984, Pub. L. 98–619, title III, §308, 98 Stat. 3329; Dec. 12, 1985, Pub. L. 99–178, title III, §307, 99 Stat. 1128; Oct. 18, 1986, Pub. L. 99–500, §101(i) [H.R. 5233, title III, §307], 100 Stat. 1783–287, and Oct. 30, 1986, Pub. L. 99–591, §101(i) [H.R. 5233, title III, §307], 100 Stat. 3341–287; Dec. 22, 1987, Pub. L. 100–202, §106, 101 Stat. 1329–433, related to powers and duties of Secretary in carrying out subchapter.

Section 1749b, acts Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title IV, §403, 64 Stat. 80; June 30, 1961, Pub. L. 87–70, title IV, §402, 75 Stat. 173; Aug. 1, 1968, Pub. L. 90–448, title XVII, §1705(f), 82 Stat. 604, related to apportionment of funds.

Section 1749c, acts Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title IV, §404, 64 Stat. 80; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title III, §§302, 303, 69 Stat. 645; July 12, 1957, Pub. L. 85–104, title VI, §601(b), 71 Stat. 304; Sept. 23, 1959, Pub. L. 86–372, title VI, §603(a), 73 Stat. 682; June 30, 1961, Pub. L. 87–70, title IV, §403, 75 Stat. 173; Sept. 2, 1964, Pub. L. 88–560, title X, §1002, 78 Stat. 806; Aug. 10, 1965, Pub. L. 89–117, title VI, §§603, 604(a), 79 Stat. 489; Nov. 3, 1966, Pub. L. 89–754, title X, §1014(a), 80 Stat. 1292; May 25, 1967, Pub. L. 90–19, §8(a), (c), 81 Stat. 22; Aug. 1, 1968, Pub. L. 90–448, title XVII, §1705(g)(2)–(7), 82 Stat. 605; Oct. 17, 1984, Pub. L. 98–479, title II, §201(d)(2), 98 Stat. 2228, defined terms used in subchapter.