alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JULY 31, 1996 AND 1995 (AUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 1996, 1995 AND
1994 (AUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,218
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,733
<PP&E>                                          10,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,819
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,434
<SALES>                                         67,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,711
<CGS>                                          153,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    200
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                105
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5315

_____________________________
R OY S. J ACKSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. February 20, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J.
, and R OBERTS and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Roy S. Jackson, Appellant, pro se

.2 Ashley B. Moody
, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Toledo, Peoria and Warsaw Railway Co. *v.*John Delehanty.

Negligence *in railroad—injury to stock.*Where a mule escaped from an in closure without the fault of the owner, and got upon a railroad track at a point not fenced, but where it was the duty of the company to have had a fence, and the mule is injured by a train, the company will be liable.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tiptoe, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Iegersoll & Puterbaugh, for the appellant.

Messrs. Rowell & Hamilton, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This action was originally commenced before a justice of the peace, to recover the value of a mule killed on appellant’s road by one of its trains.

The place where the mule got on the track was open prairie, and the company’s road was not fenced on the side nearest appellee’s residence. The open space was about eight rods wide, and there was neither fence nor cattle guard to prevent stock going upon the track from the highway, or from the open adjoining prairie. The evidence shows appel*616lee resided about two miles east of the village of Chenca, and about one quarter of a mile distant from appellant’s road. He was not the owner or occupant of the adjoining land from which the mule got upon the track, nor did he suffer it to run at large, nor was the place where the injury was done any of the places excepted by the act of 1855. The mule escaped from the inclosure of appellee without any fault on his part, and got upon the track, and was so injured by appellant’s train that it was of no value.

Every material fact necessary to enable appellee to recover was abundantly proven by uncontradicted evidence. Indeed, the right of appellee to recover is so clearly established that it is not deemed necessary to consider the errors assigned on the refusal of the court to give the instructions asked by appellant. The evidence would warrant but one verdict, and that is the one found by the jury. Had the jury found otherwise, it would have been the duty of the court to set it aside and order a new trial.

No error appearing in the record that in any manner affects the merits of the case, the judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed..*
S. 1235

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To amend part G of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act

of 1968 to allow railroad police officers to attend the Federal Bureau of Investigation National Academy for law enforcement training.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF RAILROAD POLICE OFFICERS IN FBI LAW

ENFORCEMENT TRAINING.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 701(a) of part G of title I of the

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C.

3771(a)) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1)—

(A) by striking ‘‘State or unit of local government’’

and inserting ‘‘State, unit of local government, or rail carrier’’; and

(B) by inserting ‘‘, including railroad police officers’’

before the semicolon; and

(2) in paragraph (3)—

(A) by striking ‘‘State or unit of local government’’

and inserting ‘‘State, unit of local government, or rail carrier’’;

(B) by inserting ‘‘railroad police officer,’’ after ‘‘deputies,’’;

(C) by striking ‘‘State or such unit’’ and inserting

‘‘State, unit of local government, or rail carrier’’; and

(D) by striking ‘‘State or unit.’’ and inserting ‘‘State,

unit of local government, or rail carrier.’’.

(b) RAIL CARRIER COSTS.—Section 701 of part G of title I

of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42

U.S.C. 3771) is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(d) RAIL CARRIER COSTS.—No Federal funds may be used

for any travel, transportation, or subsistence expenses incurred

in connection with the participation of a railroad police officer

in a training program conducted under subsection (a).’’.

(c) DEFINITIONS.—Section 701 of part G of title I of the Omnibus

Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3771) is

amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section—

‘‘(1) the terms ‘rail carrier’ and ‘railroad’ have the meanings

given such terms in section 20102 of title 49, United States

Code; and
S. 1235—2

‘‘(2) the term ‘railroad police officer’ means a peace officer

who is commissioned in his or her State of legal residence

or State of primary employment and employed by a rail carrier

to enforce State laws for the protection of railroad property,

personnel, passengers, or cargo.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# C_2007091EN.01002402.xml

| 26.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4594 — OEP/Arvinmeritor Emissions Technologies Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 91/05)

On 10 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4594. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4594. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.197 Does FTCA cover employees of the contractor who are paid by the contractor from funds other than those provided through the self-determination contract?

Yes, as long as the services out of which the claim arose were performed in carrying out the self-determination contract.
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.705

## Section §107.705: Registrations, reports, and applications for approval

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.705 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 98

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that concurrent resolutions on the budget not carry an estimated deficit for the

budget year or for any outyear.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1999

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. SWEENEY) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require that concurrent resolutions on the budget not

carry an estimated deficit for the budget year or for

any outyear.

Whereas Congress needs a social security surplus accountability initiative;

Whereas the unified budget surplus over the next 10 years

will total more than $2,500,000,000,000;

Whereas the social security surplus over the next 10 years

will total more than $1,700,000,000,000;

Whereas the social security surplus remains vulnerable while

there is an on-budget deficit; and
2

•HRES 98 IH

Whereas all payroll tax revenues paid into social security

should be spent only for social security tax purposes:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the

3 following new clause:

4 ‘‘7. (a) It shall not be in order to consider any concur5 rent resolution on the budget that carries an estimated

6 deficit for the budget year or for any of the 4 ensuing

7 fiscal years.

8 ‘‘(b) Paragraph (a) may be waived only by the affirm9 ative vote of three-fifths of the Members voting.’’.

Æ
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Roberta Gard , Individually and d/b/a Roberta L. Gard and Associates, and Angela Nugent, Individually , Appellant s

No. 06

- 20

- 00100

- CV v.
Douglas Ray Stracener Estate and Mary Ann Str a cener , Appellee s Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 55

- 20 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date

, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We further order that the appellant s pay all costs incurred by reason of this ap peal.

RENDERED JULY 30 , 2021 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
### §248–1. Rules and regulations for transfer of funds and charges therefor among banks; clearing houses

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall make and promulgate from time to time regulations governing the transfer of funds and charges therefor among Federal reserve banks and their branches, and may at its discretion exercise the functions of a clearing house for such Federal reserve banks, or may designate a Federal reserve bank to exercise such functions, and may also require each such bank to exercise the functions of a clearing house for depository institutions.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §16 (par.), 38 Stat. 268; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704; Pub. L. 96–221, title I, §105(d), Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 140.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the thirteenth par. (formerly the fourteenth par.) of section 16 of act Dec. 23, 1913, which was formerly classified to section 248(o) of this title. For classification to this title of other pars. of section 16, see Codification note set out under section 411 of this title.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–221, which directed amendment of "[t]he fourteenth paragraph of section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 248(o))" by substituting "depository institutions" for "its member banks", was executed by making the substitution in this section to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed the name of the Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–221 effective on first day of sixth month which begins after Mar. 31, 1980, see section 108 of Pub. L. 96–221, set out as a note under section 248 of this title.
-  About RD                  -  Key Priorities                    -  Priority Points Program Chart 
                -  Rural Development Priorities: FY 2023 
                -  Rural Development Priorities: FY 2024 
              -  History 
              -  Farm Bill 
              -  Grant Awards 
              -  Careers at Rural Development                    -  Current Job Opportunities 
              -  Rural Data Gateway 
              -  Leadership                    -  Under Secretary  
                -  Deputy Under Secretary 
                -  Chief Operating Officer 
                -  Administrators 
                -  State Directors 
              -  Agencies                    -   Rural Business-Cooperative Service                      -  Rural Business-Cooperative Service Contacts 
                -   Rural Housing Service                      -  Rural Housing Service Contacts 
                -   Rural Utilities Service                      -  Rural Utilities Service Contacts 
              -  Offices                    -  Business Center 
                -  Civil Rights                       -  Civil Rights Contacts 
                  -  Equal Employment Opportunity Branch 
                  -  Program Compliant Processing and Resolution Branch 
                  -  Program Compliance and Training Branch 
                  -  Posters 
                  -  Civil Rights Training 
                  -  Limited English Proficiency 
                  -  Civil Rights Library 
                  -  Accessibility Statement 
                -  External Affairs 
                -  Innovation Center                      -  Innovation Center Divisions 
                -  Risk Office 
                -  State Offices 
                -  Servicing Office 
              -  Initiatives                    -  Healthy Food Financing Initiative 
                -  Interagency Working Group on Cooperative Development                      -  Partners                        -  Federal 
                    -  Tribal 
                    -  State & Local 
                    -  Private Sector 
                  -  Funding Resources                        -  Grant Funding 
                    -  Equity Capital 
                    -  Loans and Guaranteed Loans 
                    -  Revolving Loan Funds 
                    -  Crowd Sourcing 
                    -  Technical Assistance 
                    -  Other 
                  -  Development Tools 
                  -  Publications & Information 
                -  Promise Zones 
                -  Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) 
                -  Rural Placemaking 
                -  Substantially Underserved Trust Area (SUTA) 
              -  Tribal Relations                    -  Tribal Relations Events 

State Contact Information

## George W. Hicks, Jr.

### Acting State Director for South Carolina

TBD
§ 202.2 Definitions. As used in these rules: ( a ) *Rate proceeding* means a proceeding involving the determination and prescription of any rate or charge made or proposed to be made for any stockyard service furnished at a stockyard by a stockyard owner or market agency, or a proceeding involving any rule, regulation or practice affecting any such rate or charge; and
( b ) *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), or any officer or employee of AMS to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act for the Administrator.
[43 FR 30510, July 14, 1978, as amended at 84 FR 45647, Aug. 30, 2019; 84 FR 56678, Oct. 23, 2019; 88 FR 62696, Sept. 13, 2023]
# C_2007069EN.01001402.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/14

---

Action brought on 8 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-66/07)

(2007/C 69/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Lawunmi, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that Directive.

1

| — | order Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 30 October 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 136, p. 34.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the Company), for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stewart York, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Stewart York                     
|Stewart York                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|Dated: February 8, 2007              



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.