alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Team Yokota Conducts Annual Major Accident Response Exercise 

By Yasuo Osakabe374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan -- Team Yokota held a Major Accident Response Exercise (MARE) at Yokota Air Base, Japan, Feb. 16. The exercise is also scheduled to repeat before the 2023 Friendship Festival, so the entire installation is primed for any emergency.“The purpose of the MARE is base-wide preparation for a mishap,” said Capt. Alex Randall, 374th Airlift Wing Safety chief of flight safety. “This ensures that all first responders and supporting agencies are ready.”The MARE scenario simulated a C-12 Huron aircraft crash to test the base response in a high-stress environment.“Today, we are practicing firefighting techniques, medical care, fuel spill cleanup, fuel sampling and safety investigation board initiation, and safeguarding of evidence,” said Randall.Realistic scenarios also help leadership evaluate the readiness of their personnel and resources should an incident occur.“We have created a scenario involving a local aircraft and we expect all agencies on base to run their checklists as if it were a real world,” said Randall. “Mishaps are rare, and a scenario like we practiced today is unlikely to occur, but training hard prepares us to respond to any contingency.”Team Yokota executed the emergency response and then transitioned the scenario to the Interim Safety Board for a simulated investigation initiation.“We are definitely prepared for any potential mishap we may face,” said Randall.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### § 171.575 Can BIA charge me a special assessment?

Yes. We will make every reasonable effort to avoid charging special assessments. However, if we determine that we have a significant uncontrolled cost due to an urgency, we may charge you a special assessment. We will only charge special assessments when there are inadequate project funds available, including any emergency reserve funds held by the project.The special assessment rate will be calculated by dividing the total uncontrolled cost, or some portion of that cost, by the total number of assessable acres. Your individual special assessment will be equal to the special assessment rate multiplied by the number of assessable acres in your farm unit.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—WAR HOUSING INSURANCE

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1942—Act May 26, 1942, ch. 319, §14(a), 56 Stat. 305, amended subchapter heading, substituting "WAR" for "DEFENSE".
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Millicom International Cellular, S.A. a company incorporated under the laws of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: March 1, 2012By:
/s/ MIKAEL GRAHNEName: Mikael GrahneTitle: Chief   Executive Officer  1
# C_2007056EN.01002402.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/24

---

Action brought on 25 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-26/07)

(2007/C 56/46)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Kontou and A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/80/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/80/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2004/80 into domestic law expired on 1 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 261, 6.8.2004, p. 15.

1

---
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_2\VRI_AltB.pdf

Location in Arizona

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Visual Resources

Management

Alternative B

Legend

Map 2-7

Data Source:

VRM Alternative: URS 2006

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: U.S. Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Visual Resource Management Class

Class II

Note:

 Land use allocations, designations, and management 

 prescriptions apply only to public lands administered

 by the BLM. If non-Federal lands are acquired, they

 would be managed according to the allocations

 depicted on the map.

Class I

Class III
### §1435. Obligations as lawful investments; liability of United States for debentures, etc., issued by banks

Obligations of the Federal Home Loan Banks issued with the approval of the Board or the Director under this chapter shall be lawful investments, and may be accepted as security, for all fiduciary, trust, and public funds the investment or deposit of which shall be under the authority or control of the United States or any officer or officers thereof. The Federal reserve banks are authorized to act as depositaries, custodians, and/or fiscal agents for Federal Home Loan Banks in the general performance of their powers under this chapter. All obligations of Federal Home Loan Banks shall plainly state that such obligations are not obligations of the United States and are not guaranteed by the United States.

(July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §15, 47 Stat. 736; Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §701(b)(1), (3)(A), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 412; Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title II, §1204(7), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2786.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–289 inserted "or the Director" after "the Board".

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 substituted "Board" for "board".
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Milford G. Maynard, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58869;

First District (2nd Division)

December 3, 1974.

*469James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Leonard V. Solomon, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Kenneth L. Gillis and Linda West Conley, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE LEIGHTON.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 31168 Summary Calendar

RONNELL VALLERY ,
P etitioner

- Appellant

v.
CALVIN JOHNSON , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:18

- CV

- 953

Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Ronnell Va llery, formerly federal prisoner # 29981

- 034, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. Relying on Alleyene v. United States , 570 U.S. 99 (2013), and United States v.
Haines , 803 F.3d 713 (5th Cir. 2015), Vallery argues that he was not subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years of imprisonment. We review the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 23, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-31168 Document: 00515128655 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/23/2019No. 18

- 31168

2 district court’s legal determinations de novo and its factual findings for clear

error. Padilla v. United St ates , 416 F.3d 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). Generally, a federal prisoner must seek relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 if he wishes to challenge his conviction or sentence. Id. at 426. However, he may raise claims in a § 2241 petition where the remedy under § 2 255 is inadequate or ineffective and thus the claims fall within the savings clause of § 2255(e).
Id. He must establish that his claims (1) are based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision that establishes that he may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense and (2) were foreclosed by circuit law at the time of his trial, direct appeal, or first § 2255 motion. Reyes

- Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). To meet the first prong, he must show “that
based on a retro actively applicable Supreme Court decision, he was convicted for conduct that did not constitute a crime.” Jeffers v. Chandler , 253 F.3d 827, 831 (5th Cir. 2001). Vallery disputes his enhanced sentence, not the underlying conviction. This court has repe atedly held that challenges to the validity of a sentencing enhancement do not satisfy the savings clause of § 2255(e). See, e.g. , In re Bradford , 660 F.3d 226, 230 (5th Cir. 2011); Padilla , 416 F.3d at 427. Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of his petition is affirmed.
AFFIRMED. Case: 18-31168 Document: 00515128655 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/23/2019
§ 111.23 Representation by counsel; notification. ( a ) If a respondent wishes to be represented by counsel with regard to any matter pending before the Commission, respondent shall give the Commission a written notice of representation signed by the respondent, which shall include: ( 1 ) The name, address, email address, and telephone number of the counsel;
( 2 ) A statement authorizing such counsel to receive any and all notifications and other communications from the Commission on behalf of respondent.
( b ) Upon receipt of this notice, the Commission shall have no contact with respondent except through the designated counsel unless authorized in writing by respondent.
[45 FR 15120, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 89 FR 218, Jan. 2, 2024]
### §5202. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:

#### (1) Appropriate committees of Congress

The term "appropriate committees of Congress" means—

(A) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, the Committee on Finance, the Committee on the Budget, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Financial Services, the Committee on Ways and Means, the Committee on the Budget, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

#### (2) Board

The term "Board" means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

#### (3) Congressional support agencies

The term "congressional support agencies" means the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation.

#### (4) Corporation

The term "Corporation" means the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

#### (5) Financial institution

The term "financial institution" means any institution, including, but not limited to, any bank, savings association, credit union, security broker or dealer, or insurance company, established and regulated under the laws of the United States or any State, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, or the United States Virgin Islands, and having significant operations in the United States, but excluding any central bank of, or institution owned by, a foreign government.

#### (6) Fund

The term "Fund" means the Troubled Assets Insurance Financing Fund established under section 5212 of this title.

#### (7) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Treasury.

#### (8) TARP

The term "TARP" means the Troubled Asset Relief Program established under section 5211 of this title.

#### (9) Troubled assets

The term "troubled assets" means—

(A) residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before March 14, 2008, the purchase of which the Secretary determines promotes financial market stability; and

(B) any other financial instrument that the Secretary, after consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, determines the purchase of which is necessary to promote financial market stability, but only upon transmittal of such determination, in writing, to the appropriate committees of Congress.

(Pub. L. 110–343, div. A, §3, Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3766.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act" and was translated as reading "this division", meaning div. A of Pub. L. 110–343, Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3765, known as the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. For complete classification of division A to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5201 of this title and Tables.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Improve Rural Transportation Systems, Opening 

the Door to Economic Opportunities for People Living in Rural Communities

WASHINGTON, Jan. 19, 2023 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is accepting applications to enhance the operation 

of rural transportation systems. These investments in rural transportation systems build opportunities and 

prosperity for the people who live in rural communities by connecting them to economic resources they may not 

otherwise be able to access.

The grants are part of the Rural Business Development Grant program. Eligible applicants are qualified, 

experienced national organizations seeking to provide rural communities with training and technical assistance 

to improve passenger transportation services and facilities. USDA does not provide funding directly to 

individuals or businesses under this program. 

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help communities create more and better market opportunities, advance equity and combat climate change. 

These extra points will increase the likelihood of funding. For more information, visit 

https://www.rd.usda.gov/priority-points. 

Applications will be scored, reviewed and selected on a competitive basis. Applications must be submitted to 

the applicant’s nearest USDA office by April 19, 2023, at 4:30 p.m. local time. Additional information is 

available on page 3376 of the Jan. 19, 2023, Federal Register.

To subscribe to receive USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15205-15206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06552]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Certification Notice--233]

Notice of Filing of Self-Certification of Coal Capability Under 
the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of Filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 2, 2015, NTE Carolinas, LLC, as owner and operator of 
a new base load electric powerplant, submitted a coal capability self-
certification to the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to Sec.  
201(d) of the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 (FUA), as 
amended, and DOE regulations in 10 CFR 501.60, 61. FUA and regulations 
thereunder require DOE to publish a notice of filing of self-
certification in the Federal Register. 42 U.S.C. 8311(d) and 10 CFR 
501.61(c).

ADDRESSES: Copies of coal capability self-certification filings are 
available for public inspection, upon request, in the Office of 
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Mail Code OE-20, Room

[[Page 15206]]

8G-024, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, 
DC 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Lawrence at (202) 586-
5260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of FUA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 
et seq.), provides that no new base load electric powerplant may be 
constructed or operated without the capability to use coal or another 
alternate fuel as a primary energy source. Pursuant to FUA in order to 
meet the requirement of coal capability, the owner or operator of such 
a facility proposing to use natural gas or petroleum as its primary 
energy source shall certify to the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) 
prior to construction, or prior to operation as a base load electric 
powerplant, that such powerplant has the capability to use coal or 
another alternate fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with 
FUA section 201(a) as of the date it is filed with the Secretary. 42 U. 
S. C. 8311.
    The following owner of a proposed new base load electric powerplant 
has filed a self-certification of coal-capability with DOE pursuant to 
FUA section 201(d) and in accordance with DOE regulations in 10 CFR 
501.60, 61:
    Owner: NTE Carolinas, LLC.
    Capacity: 475 megawatts (MW).
    Plant Location: Gage Road, Kings Mountain, NC 28086.
    In-Service Date: As early as January 2018.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 17, 2015.
 Brian Mills,
 Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of Electricity Delivery and 
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2015-06552 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
§ 13.21 Discovery. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) The following types of discovery are authorized: ( i ) Requests for production of Documents for inspection and copying;
( ii ) Requests for admissions of the authenticity of any relevant Document or of the truth of any relevant fact;
( iii ) Written interrogatories; and
( iv ) Depositions.
( 2 ) Unless mutually agreed to by the parties, discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ. The ALJ will regulate the timing of discovery.
( b ) *Documents defined.* ( 1 ) For the purpose of this section and §§ 13.22 and 13.23, the term *Documents* includes information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence.
( 2 ) Nothing in this part will be interpreted to require the creation of a Document.
( c ) *Motions for discovery.* ( 1 ) A party seeking discovery may file a motion. Such a motion will be accompanied by a copy of the request for production of Documents, request for admissions, or interrogatories or, in the case of depositions, a summary of the scope of the proposed deposition.
( 2 ) Within ten days of service, a party may file an opposition to the motion or a motion for protective order as provided in § 13.24.
( 3 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for discovery only if he or she finds that the discovery sought: ( i ) Is necessary for the expeditious, fair, and reasonable consideration of the issues;
( ii ) Is not unduly costly or burdensome;
( iii ) Will not unduly delay the proceeding; and
( iv ) Does not seek privileged information.
( 4 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery.
( 5 ) The ALJ may grant discovery subject to a protective order under § 13.24.
( d ) *Depositions.* ( 1 ) If a motion for deposition is granted, the ALJ will issue a subpoena for the deponent, which may require the deponent to produce Documents. The subpoena will specify the time and place at which the deposition will be held. Deposition requests for senior level DHS officials (including career and non-career senior executive level employees) shall not be approved absent showing of compelling need that cannot be met by any other means.
( 2 ) The party seeking to depose will serve the subpoena in the manner prescribed in § 13.8.
( 3 ) The deponent may file a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order within ten days of service. If the ALJ has not acted on such a motion by the return date, such date will be suspended pending the ALJ's final action on the motion.
( 4 ) The party seeking to depose will provide for the taking of a verbatim transcript of the deposition, which it will Make available to all other parties for inspection and copying.
( e ) Each party will bear its own costs of discovery.