alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5.49 Prohibition on providing expert or opinion testimony. ( a ) Except as provided in this section, and subject to 5 CFR 2635.805, Department employees shall not provide opinion or expert testimony based upon information which they acquired in the scope and performance of their official Department duties, except on behalf of the United States or a party represented by the Department of Justice.
( b ) Any expert or opinion testimony by a former employee of the Department shall be excepted from 5.49(a) where the testimony involves only general expertise gained while employed at the Department.
( c ) Upon a showing by the requestor of exceptional need or unique circumstances and that the anticipated testimony will not be adverse to the interests of the United States, the appropriate Department official designated in § 5.44 may, consistent with 5 CFR 2635.805, in their discretion and with the concurrence of the Office of the General Counsel, grant special, written authorization for Department employees, or former employees, to appear and testify as expert witnesses at no expense to the United States.
( d ) If, despite the final determination of the appropriate Department official designated in § 5.44, a court of competent jurisdiction or other appropriate authority orders the appearance and expert or opinion testimony of a current or former Department employee, that person shall immediately inform the Office of the General Counsel of such order. If the Office of the General Counsel determines that no further legal review of or challenge to the court's order will be made, the Department employee, or former employee, shall comply with the order. If so directed by the Office of the General Counsel, however, the employee, or former employee, shall respectfully decline to testify.
# C_2006326EN.01008801.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/88

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 22 November 2006 — Larsen v Commission

(Case F-11/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 326/177)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.3.2006, p. 35.

1

---
Porque soy Unica,
porque soy latina,
puedo alcanzar

mis metas.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.225 Does an Indian tribe or tribal organization get paid immediately if the awarding official decides in its favor?

Yes. Once the awarding official decides that money should be paid under the contract, the amount due, minus any portion already paid, should be paid as promptly as possible, without waiting for either party to file an appeal. Any payment which is made under this subsection will not affect any other rights either party might have. In addition, it will not create a binding legal precedent as to any future payments.
# Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 14

- 00999

- CV

Sahami Investments, Ltd

v

.

Stately Homes, LLC, Theodore More and Bryan Phillips

NO. 2014

- 12172 IN THE 113TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATU S PAID BY

MT FEE
MT FEE
MT FEE
MT FEE
CLK RECORD
STATEWIDE EFILING
FILING $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $101.00 $20.00 $175.00 04/07/2015
03/11/2015
03/04/2015
02/19/2015
01/24/2015
12/22/2014
12/22/2014 E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- P AID
UNKNOWN
PAID
PAID APE
ANT
APE
APE
ANT
ANT
ANT 

### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $33 6 .00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine , Clerk o f the Court o f Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, this July 1 7 , 2015

.
# C_2007082EN.01001001.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/10

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Protodikio Tripolis, Greece) — Carrefour — Marinopoulos AE v Nomarkhiaki aftodiikisi Tripolis

(Case C-126/06) (1)

1

(Free movement of goods - Article 28 EC - Quantitative restrictions - Measures having equivalent effect - Marketing of frozen bakery products)

(2007/C 82/19)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Diikitiko Protodikio Tripolis

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Carrefour — Marinopoulos AE

Applicant:

Defendant: Nomarkhiaki aftodiikisi Tripolis

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Diikitiko Protodikio Tripolis — Interpretation of Art. 28 EC — Marketing of pre-cooked bakery products (‘bake-off ’products) — Requirement of a licence

Operative part of the order

Article 28 EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which makes the sale of ‘bake-off ’products subject to the same requirements as those applicable to the complete process of manufacturing and marketing bread and traditional bakery products.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

1

---
### §2926. Family child care providers

(a) In General.—Not less frequently than quarterly, the Commandant shall ensure that each family child care provider is subject to inspection.

(b) Responsibility for Inspections.—Of the quarterly inspections under subsection (a) each year—

(1) 3 inspections shall be carried out by a representative of the Coast Guard installation served by the family child care provider concerned; and

(2) 1 inspection shall be carried out by a representative of the Coast Guard child development services work-life programs.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXII [LXXXII], §8237(b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4665.)
#### § 247.10 What will happen if I abandon property?

If you abandon property at a site, it may be removed without your consent and disposed of at your expense, if the Area Director approves.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Member Bank Reserves

              																	Federal Reserve Board, 1914-1935					 and 	Smead, Edward Leon, 1884-1983. 						*Member Bank Reserves : Report of Federal Reserve System; Committee on Bank Reserves*,										November 11, 1931,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1060,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Title Guarantee and Trust Company, Respondent, v. Isador Dobroezynski, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
### [§524. Renumbered §12011]
# Death of Army Corporal Frank W. Buckles, the Last Surviving American Veteran of World War I 

As a mark of respect for the memory of Army Corporal Frank W. Buckles, the last surviving American veteran of World War I, and in remembrance of the generation of American veterans of World War I, I hereby order, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, that, on the day of his interment, the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset on such day.  I further direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same period at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2011-5032

Billing code 3195-W1-P
#### James Shirley v. Lee S. Bernheim.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 24, 2014

NO. 03-14-00219-CV

Janet Denise Stuckey, Appellant

v.

John Stuckey, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 2, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted her appeal and did not 

comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for 

want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court 

and the court below.
§ 9409.13 Procedures when the General Counsel directs an employee not to testify or provide documents. ( a ) If the General Counsel determines that an employee or former employee should not comply with a subpoena or other request for testimony or the production of documents, the General Counsel will so inform the employee and the party who submitted the subpoena or made the request.
( b ) If, despite the determination of the General Counsel that testimony should not be given and/or documents not be produced, a court of competent jurisdiction or other appropriate authority orders the employee or former employee to testify and/or produce documents; the employee shall notify the General Counsel of such order. ( 1 ) If the General Counsel determines that no further legal review of, or challenge to, the order will be sought, the employee or former employee shall comply with the order.
( 2 ) If the General Counsel determines to challenge the order, or that further legal review is necessary, the employee or former employee should not comply with the order. Where necessary, the employee should appear at the time and place set forth in the subpoena. If legal counsel cannot appear on behalf of the employee, the employee should produce a copy of this part and respectfully inform the legal tribunal that he/she has been advised by counsel not to provide the requested testimony and/or produce documents. If the legal tribunal rules that the subpoena must be complied with, the employee shall respectfully decline to comply, citing this section and *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951).
Exhibit 99.2

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to (b) of section 1350, I hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|                                                                          |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: /s/ GAIL L. HANSONGail L. Hanson
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003 |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cobalt Corporation and will be retained by Cobalt Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
### §4306. Payment of interest

#### (a) Calculated on full amount of principal

Interest on an interest-bearing account at any depository institution shall be calculated by such institution on the full amount of principal in the account for each day of the stated calculation period at the rate or rates of interest disclosed pursuant to this chapter.

#### (b) No particular method of compounding interest required

Subsection (a) shall not be construed as prohibiting or requiring the use of any particular method of compounding or crediting of interest.

#### (c) Date by which interest must accrue

Interest on accounts that are subject to this chapter shall begin to accrue not later than the business day specified for interest-bearing accounts in section 4005 of this title, subject to subsections (b) and (c) of such section.

(Pub. L. 102–242, title II, §267, Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2338; Pub. L. 102–550, title XVI, §1604(e)(2)(B), (C), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4084.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsecs. (a), (c). Pub. L. 102–550 made technical amendment to references to "this chapter" to reflect correction of corresponding provision of original act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–550 effective as if included in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, Pub. L. 102–242, as of Dec. 19, 1991, see section 1609(a) of Pub. L. 102–550, set out as a note under section 191 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month
period ending October 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Herndon, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/Carl Herndon
     ---------------------------
     Carl Herndon
     Principal Executive Officer
     December 13, 2004
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

The Board of Directors 

Foamex International Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-74264, 33-94154, 333-90020, and 333-143149) on Form S-8 of Foamex International Inc. of our reports dated April 4, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Foamex International Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ deficiency for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 30, 2007, the related financial statement schedules as listed in the index on page S-1, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2007, which reports appear in the December 30, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Foamex International Inc.

Our report with respect to the consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedules refers to the adoption by the Company of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” effective January 2, 2006, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),” effective December 31, 2006, and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143,” effective January 1, 2006.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

May 28, 2008
71 ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 24-0045 

MITCHELL SCOTT PA11ERSON, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JIM SALMONSEN, WARDEN, 

MONTANA STATE PRISON, 

Respondent. 

ORDER 

Mitchell Scott Patterson has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, asserting 

that, pursuant to a recent decision by the Sentence Review Division of this Court, the Sex 

Offender Program (SOP) does not exist and that he cannot fulfill his sentencing condition. 

Upon review of his Petition, we deem it appropriate to require a response. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that that the Attorney General or counsel for the Department of 

Correction is GRANTED thirty days from the date of this Order in which to prepare, file, 

and serve a written response together with appropriate documentary exhibits. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to 

Mitchell Patterson personally. 

DATED this 2u tg—day of January, 2024. 

FILED 

JAN 2 6 2324 

Bovve)n Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

01/26/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0045
### §3707. Commencement of foreclosure; powers and duties of foreclosure commissioner or substitute

(a) If the Secretary as holder of a multifamily mortgage determines that the prerequisites to foreclosure set forth in section 3705 of this title are satisfied, the Secretary may request the foreclosure commissioner to commence foreclosure of the mortgage. Upon such request, the foreclosure commissioner shall commence foreclosure of the mortgage, by commencing service of a notice of default and foreclosure sale in accordance with section 3708 of this title.

(b) Subsequent to commencement of a foreclosure under this chapter, the Secretary may designate a substitute foreclosure commissioner at any time up to forty-eight hours prior to the time of foreclosure sale, and the foreclosure shall continue without prejudice, unless the substitute commissioner, in his or her sole discretion, finds that continuation of the foreclosure sale will unfairly affect the interests of the mortgagor. In the event that the substitute commissioner makes such a finding, the substitute commissioner shall cancel the foreclosure sale, or adjourn such sale in the manner provided in section 3710(c) of this title. Upon designation of a substitute foreclosure commissioner, a copy of the written notice of such designation referred to in section 3704 of this title shall be served upon the persons set forth in section 3708(1) of this title (1) by mail as provided in such section 3708 of this title (except that the minimum time periods between mailing and the date of foreclosure sale prescribed in such section shall not apply to notice by mail pursuant to this subsection), or (2) in any other manner, which in the substitute commissioner's sole discretion, is conducive to achieving timely notice of such substitution. In the event a substitute foreclosure commissioner is designated less than forty-eight hours prior to the time of the foreclosure sale, the pending foreclosure shall be terminated and a new foreclosure shall be commenced by commencing service of a new notice of default and foreclosure sale.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title III, §368, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 425.)
### §5116. Study and reports on defaults and foreclosures

#### (a) Study required

The Director shall conduct an extensive study of the root causes of default and foreclosure of home loans, using as much empirical data as is available.

#### (b) Preliminary report to Congress

Not later than 6 months after July 30, 2008, the Director shall submit to Congress a preliminary report regarding the study required by this section.

#### (c) Final report to Congress

Not later than 12 months after July 30, 2008, the Director shall submit to Congress a final report regarding the results of the study required by this section, which shall include any recommended legislation relating to the study, and recommendations for best practices and for a process to provide targeted assistance to populations with the highest risk of potential default or foreclosure.

(Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title V, §1517, July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2824; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1100(3), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2106.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Director" for "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Exhibit 21.1





                 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





                                                 STATE OF
          NAME                                INCORPORATION
          ----                                -------------

   DirectCom Networks, Inc.                      Delaware

   Prevue Interactive, Inc.                      Delaware

   Prevue International, Inc.                    Delaware

   Prevue Networks, Inc.                         Delaware

   Prevue Ventures, Inc.                         Delaware

   SSDS, Inc.                                    Colorado

   Sneak Prevue, L.L.C.                          Delaware

   SpaceCom Systems, Inc.                        Delaware

   Superstar/Netlink Group, L.L.C.               Delaware

   United Video Network Sales, Inc.              Delaware

   UV Corp.                                      Delaware

   UVSG Companies (General Partnership)          Oklahoma

   UVSG Interactive, Inc.                        Delaware

   UVSG Technology Ventures, Inc.                Delaware



                                  1


<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-26797, 333-30771, 333-39213, 333-39189,
333-69761, 333-69765, 333-93413 and 333-93407) of Vital Images, Inc. of our
report dated February 11, 2000 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 17, 2000