alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §320. Coast Guard Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps

(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating may establish and maintain a Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps, organized into units, at public and private secondary educational institutions.

(b) Applicability.—Except as provided in subsection (d), the provisions of chapter 102 of title 10 shall apply to a Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps established and maintained under this section in the same manner that such provisions apply to the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps of each military department. For purposes of the application of such provisions to this section—

(1) any reference in such provisions to a "military department" shall be treated as a reference to the department in which the Coast Guard is operating; and

(2) any reference in such provisions to a "Secretary of a military department", a "Secretary concerned", or the "Secretary of Defense" shall be treated as a reference to the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating.

(c) Scope.—Beginning on December 31, 2025, the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall maintain at all times a Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps program with not fewer than 1 such program established in each Coast Guard district.

(d) Exception.—The requirements of chapter 102 of title 10 shall not apply to a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps established by the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating before the date of the enactment of this section unless the Secretary determines it is appropriate to apply such requirements to such unit.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §519(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1350; amended Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXII, §11247(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4047.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (d), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 116–92, which was approved Dec. 20, 2019.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–263, §11247(a)(2), substituted "subsection (d)" for "subsection (c)".

Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 117–263, §11247(a)(1), (3), added subsec. (c) and redesignated former subsec. (c) as (d).
# C_2010346EN.01003501.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/35

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 20 October 2010 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie v M. Singh

(Case C-502/10)

()

2010/C 346/61

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie

Appellant:

Other party: M. Singh

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the concept of formally limited residence permit within the meaning of Article 3(2)(e) of Council Directive 2003/109/EC (1) of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents to be interpreted as including a fixed-period residence permit which, under Netherlands law, does not offer any prospect of a residence permit of indefinite duration, even if, under Netherlands law, the period of validity of the fixed-period residence permit can in principle be extended indefinitely and also if a particular group of people, such as spiritual leaders and religious teachers, are thereby excluded from the application of the Directive?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44.

1

---
### §4718. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Fund authorization

#### (1) In general

To carry out this subchapter, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Fund, to remain available until expended—

(A) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 1995;

(B) $104,000,000 for fiscal year 1996;

(C) $107,000,000 for fiscal year 1997; and

(D) $111,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

or such greater sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter.

#### (2) Administrative expenses

#### (A) In general

Of amounts authorized to be appropriated to the Fund pursuant to this section, not more than $5,550,000 may be used by the Fund in each fiscal year to pay the administrative costs and expenses of the Fund. Costs associated with the training program established under section 4708 of this title and the technical assistance program established under section 4707 of this title shall not be considered to be administrative expenses for purposes of this paragraph.

#### (B) Calculations

The amounts referred to in paragraphs (3) and (4) shall be calculated after subtracting the amount referred to in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph from the total amount appropriated to the Fund in accordance with paragraph (1) in any fiscal year.

#### (3) Capitalization assistance

Not more than 5 percent of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1) may be used as provided in section 4712 of this title.

#### (4) Availability for funding section 4713 of this title

331/3 percent of the amounts appropriated to the Fund for any fiscal year pursuant to the authorization in paragraph (1) shall be available for use in carrying out section 4713 of this title.

#### (5) Support of community development financial institutions

The Administrator shall allocate funds authorized under this section, to the maximum extent practicable, for the support of community development financial institutions.

#### (b) Community Development Credit Union Revolving Loan Fund

There are authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of the Community Development Credit Union Revolving Loan Fund—

(1) $4,000,000 for fiscal year 1995;

(2) $2,000,000 for fiscal year 1996;

(3) $2,000,000 for fiscal year 1997; and

(4) $2,000,000 for fiscal year 1998.

#### (c) Budgetary treatment

Amounts authorized to be appropriated under this section shall be subject to discretionary spending caps, as provided in section 665 1 of title 2, and therefore shall reduce by an equal amount funds made available for other discretionary spending programs.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §121, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2189.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 665 of title 2, referred to in subsec. (c), was repealed by Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10118(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 695.

1 See References in Text note below.
```

[Federal Register: May 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 103)]
[Notices]               
[Page 29995-29996]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28my10-49]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  2 p.m., Wednesday, June 16, 2010.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

[[Page 29996]]

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-13084 Filed 5-26-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-15-00249- CV

Michael F ranzak, Appellan t

v. Cielo Multi F am ily LL C d/b/ a Cielo Apartm ents, Appellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 2 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 15- 0029 21, H ONO RAB LE ERIC SH EP P ERD, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Michae l Fr anzak filed his notice of appea l on April 30, 2015. The rec ord
was completed on J uly 10, 2015, making appellant’ s brief due on August 9, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a)
. On August 25, we sent appellant notice that his brief was overdue , reque sting a response by September 4. To date, appellant has not filed his brief or otherwise responde d to our notice. We there fore dismiss the appe al for w ant of prose cution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b), ( c).

__________________________________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: September

30, 2015
### SUBCHAPTER III—APPAREL AND TEXTILES
# C_2010161EN.01003001.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/30

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Patrizia Banchetti v Ministero dell’Interno

(Case C-166/10)

(2010/C 161/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Patrizia Banchetti

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:

| (a) | tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;

| (b) | in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);

| (c) | provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence? |
| --- | --- |

(c)

provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?

---
Annual Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.56 
 The Gymboree Corporation 
 Annual Bonus Plan 
 Home Office and the Dixon Distribution Center Management Team 
 The annual bonus plan is based on the Company’s quarterly earnings expectations and provides for payment of cash bonuses at specified target payout amounts calculated as a percentage of a participant’s base salary, subject to
eligibility requirements. If at least the minimum applicable performance goals are met, bonus payments will range from 25% to 150% of the target payout amounts, depending on how actual performance compares to the established performance goals.
Following the end of each fiscal quarter, the management team will discuss variances to performance targets at the company meeting. If the applicable quarterly earnings expectations are met, a bonus will be paid quarterly to eligible employees.
Bonus amounts above 100% of the target payout amount for any quarter will be paid after the end of the fiscal year. If quarterly expectations are not met, there is an opportunity for eligible employees to earn a “catch-up” bonus at the end
of the fiscal year if the Company’s annual earnings expectations are met. The Company reserves the right to change the bonus methodology at any time.
Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
Foamex  International  Inc.  on Form S-8  (File  Nos.  33-74264,  33-94154,  and
333-90020)  of our report dated  February 22, 2002 (March 5, 2003 as to Notes 2,
18, 19, 20, 21) (which report  expresses an unqualified  opinion and includes an
explanatory  paragraph  relating to the  discontinuance  of the  application  of
certain accounting  standards for the current year's financial statements and an
explanatory paragraph relating to the significant  differences between generally
accepted  accounting  principles in Thailand and generally  accepted  accounting
principles in the Unites  States of America as more fully  described in Notes 18
and 19 to the consolidated financial statements), appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Foamex International Inc. for the year ended December 28, 2003.




                                            Wimolporn Boonyusthian
/s/ Wimolporn Boonyusthian              Certified Public Accountant (Thailand)
--------------------------
Bangkok, Thailand                              Registration No. 4067
March 8, 2004                              DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU JAIYOS
# C_2010234EN.01002902.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/29

---

Appeal brought on 9 July 2010 by Claro, S.A. against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Fifth Chamber) on 28 April 2010 in Case T-225/09 Claro, S.A. v OHIM and Telefónica, S.A.

(Case C-349/10 P)

()

2010/C 234/48

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Claro, S.A. (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and Castán Pérez-Gómez, abogados)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Telefónica, S.A.

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should take cognisance of the appeal lodged and the supporting documents, declare the appeal against the judgment of the Fifth Chamber of the General Court of 28 April 2010 in Case T-225/09 lodged in time and in the required form and, via the appropriate procedure, and set aside the judgment under appeal and grant the form of order sought by Claro, S.A.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Erroneous interpretation made by the General Court of Article 59 of the Community trade mark regulation. The appeal is based on the premise that, contrary to the arguments of the General Court (and of the Board of Appeal earlier in the proceedings), the submission of the statement of the grounds for the appeal does not constitute a requirement for the admissibility of the appeal, but constitutes a mere procedural requirement. By its ground of appeal the appellant also claims that that misinterpretation on the part of the General Court (and the Board of Appeal earlier in the proceedings) entailed an infringement of the principle of continuity in terms of their functions between the various departments of OHIM, set out in Article 62(1) of Regulation No 40/94. (1)

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
#### Larry L. Stout, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Orin G. Smith, Defendant-Appellee.

(No. 12468;

Fourth District

December 30, 1974.

Hugh A. Henry, Jr., of Bloomington, for appellant.

Dunn, Brady, Goebel, Ulbrich, Morel & Jacob, of Bloomington (Frank M. Brady, of counsel), for appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE TRAPP

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant entered following a bench trial. The trial court found that plaintiff had failed to sustain his burden of proof that defendant was guilty of negligence which proximately caused plaintiff’s personal injury and property damage.

The automobile driven by defendant struck that of plaintiff in rear as both parties were travelling south in the right-hand lane of a four-lane highway. There is conflicting evidence of the intensity of a snowstorm, plaintiff testifying that it was a “mild snow” in flurries, while all of the other witnesses testified that visibility was near zero and the pavement snow covered.

The collision occurred almost immediately after a tractor-trailer passed both vehicles. In doing so, it threw up snow clouds and snow blew from the top of the trailer so as to obscure the vision of each party for some seconds. The issue of fact here is whether such occurrences caused plaintiff to suddenly slow his car by applying the brakes so that defendant drove into it. The court stated that it did not accept plaintiff’s testimony *825at the trial that he did not apply his brakes or slow his car suddenly. Plaintiff’s credibility was tested by the testimony of a State trooper and of the defendant that plaintiff had made contrary statements at the scene. The court also concluded that the evidence showed that defendant was driving at a reasonable speed and slowed such speed as the trailer was passing.

The issues and the credibility of the witnesses were for the trier of the fact. We find nothing in tire record which shows such verdict as contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. *Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc.,*37 Ill.2d 352, 226 N.E.2d 624.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SMITH, J., and SIMKINS, P. J., concur.
§ 201.39 Payment to be made to consignor or shipper by market agencies; exceptions. ( a ) No market agency shall, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, pay the net proceeds or any part thereof, arising from the sale of livestock consigned to it for sale, to any person other than the consignor or shipper of such livestock except upon an order from the Secretary or a court of competent jurisdiction, unless ( 1 ) such market agency has reason to believe that such person is the owner of the livestock,
( 2 ) such person holds a valid, unsatisfied mortgage or lien upon the particular livestock, or
( 3 ) such person holds a written order authorizing such payment executed by the owner at the time of or immediately following the consignment of such livestock: *Provided,* That this paragraph shall not apply to deductions made from sales proceeds for the purpose of financing promotion and research activities, including educational activities, relating to livestock, meat, and other products covered by the Act, carried out by producer-sponsored organizations.
( b ) The net proceeds arising from the sale of livestock, the ownership of which has been questioned by a market agency duly authorized to inspect brands, marks, and other identifying characteristics of livestock may be paid in accordance with the directions of such brand inspection agency if the laws of the State from which such livestock originated or was shipped to market make provision for payment of the proceeds in the manner directed by the brand inspection agency and if the market agency to which the livestock was consigned, and the consignor or consignors concerned, are unable to establish the ownership of the livestock within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 60 days after sale.
(7 U.S.C. 181 *et seq.*)
[19 FR 4528, July 22, 1954, as amended at 28 FR 7218, July 13, 1963; 44 FR 45361, Aug. 2, 1979]
#### Rika Saphir, Respondent, v. The Terry and Tench Company, Appellant.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 477]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ477.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 3572]]

Public Law 109-477
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To extend for 2 years the authority to grant waivers of the foreign 
  country residence requirement with respect to certain international 
       medical graduates. <<NOTE: Jan. 12, 2007 -  [H.R. 4997]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Physicians for 
Underserved Areas Act.>> 

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 8 USC 1101 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physicians for Underserved Areas 
Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF FOREIGN COUNTRY RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT WITH RESPECT TO 
            INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES.

    Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Technical 
Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note; Public Law 103-416) (as 
amended by section 1(a)(1) of Public Law 108-441) is amended by striking 
``June 1, 2006.'' and inserting ``June 1, 2008.''.

SEC. 3. <<NOTE: 8 USC 1182 note.>> EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect as if enacted on 
May 31, 2006.

    Approved January 12, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4997:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-715 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Dec. 6, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2007108EN.01000201.xml

| 12.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 May 2007

(2007/C 108/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3486 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4518 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6813 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,226 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6439 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,35 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,177 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5829 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,272 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,61 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7786 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2835 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,686 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8136 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,624 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5036 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,546 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8468 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0482 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 249,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4688 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3527 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3229 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 962,08 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5981 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,613 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,863 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,83 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3486

JPY

Japanese yen

161,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4518

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6813

SEK

Swedish krona

9,226

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6439

ISK

Iceland króna

86,35

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,177

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5829

CZK

Czech koruna

28,272

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,61

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7786

RON

Romanian leu

3,2835

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,686

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8136

AUD

Australian dollar

1,624

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5036

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,546

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8468

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0482

KRW

South Korean won

1 249,82

ZAR

South African rand

9,4688

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3527

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3229

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 962,08

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5981

PHP

Philippine peso

63,613

RUB

Russian rouble

34,863

THB

Thai baht

44,83

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---