alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**SOCIALWISE, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Socialwise, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Shultz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### § 109.11 When is a “non-authorization notice” (disclaimer) required?

Whenever any person makes an independent expenditure for the purpose of financing communications expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, such person shall comply with the requirements of 11 CFR 110.11.
Fw: VOC RACT Applicability SIP prehearing with rerquest for parallel 

processing 

Sara Waterson ta Jane Spann 071231201 2 08:52 AM 

;iisloi y This message has been replied to. 

5 attachments 

- - 

prehearing submission with request for parallel processing.7.19.2012.pdf Admin~and~Tech~Support_checklist.pdf 

T -- 

201 2071 9Notice-VOC-Applicability.pdf20120719 Amendment VOC Applicability Thresholds.pdf 

T - 

20120719 Synopsis - VOC Applicability.pdf 

Jane, 

Here's the email from Jimmy we were talking about last week. 

Sara Waterson 

US EPA Region 4 

Regulatory Development Section 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 

(404) 562-9061 (office) 

(404) 562-9095 (fax) 

Waterson.Sara@epa.gov 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other 

confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe 

that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, 

retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please 

indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and 

delete the copy you received. 

----- Forwarded by Sara Waterson/R4/USEPA/US on 07/23/2012 08:51AM ----- 

....................... ....................... 

To: Lynorae Benjamin/R4/USEPA/US@EPAI ScottR Davis/R4/USEPA/US@EPA, Sara 

Waterson/R4/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Jimmy Johnston" <Jimmy.Johnston@dnr.state.ga.us> 

Date: 07/22/2012 05:14PM 

Cc: "James Capp" <James.Capp@dnr.state.ga.us>, "James Kelly" 

<James.Kelly@dnr.state.ga.us>, "Lynne Collier" <Lynne.Collier@dnr.state.ga.us> 

Subject: VOC RACT Applicability SIP prehearing with rerquest for 

parallel processing 

Attached is an exact copy of the documents that are to be submitted by 

hard-copy. The hard copy submission and CD will follow via mail. 

James P. Johnston, P.E. 

Program Manager 
Planning & Support Program 

Air Protection Branch 

Georgia Environmental Protection Division 

phone: 404/363-7014 

fax: 404/363-7100
51Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, James Y. Gleasman, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Torvec, Inc.,hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Torvec, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Reserved] [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8392 and 34-49313.]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based upon such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: August 11, 2006 /s/ James Y. Gleasman  James Y. Gleasman  Chief Executive Officer and Interim ChiefFinancial Officer
#### MURRAY v. JUSTICE

No. 540P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 169

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1990.
2017 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item
1123)



Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of March 1, 2012 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to CWCapital
Asset Management LLC, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Certificate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor relating to the COMM 2012-LC4 Mortgage Trust,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (COMM 2012-LC4)





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto
Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there
has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has
been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                |  | Date:  March
    1, 2018
|------------- | ------------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |
(40 South. 171.)

No. 15,602.

#### VINTON OIL & SULPHUR CO., Limited, v. PARK.

(Jan. 2, 1906.)

Afpeau — Review—Questions oe Fact.

This case involves only questions of fact.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu; Edmund Dennis Miller, Judge.

Action by the Vinton Oil & Sulphur Company, Limited, against J. M. Park. Judgment, for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Reversed.

Schwing & Moore, for appellant. Williams & Williams, for appellee.

PROVOSTY, J.

The plaintiff company demands of defendant payment of his stock subscription, $2,500. Defendant answers, and he testifies that he transferred the stock to J. P. Sturm, and that the latter paid the debt by deducting the amount from a debt of the company to him on a contract for the boring of an oil well.

In that, statement he is corroborated by Sam Park, J. L. Perry, and A. Perry, who, with him and Aladin Vincent and W. M. Perkins, were the organizers of the company and continued to be the sole stockholders. Perkins and Sturm did not testify. One was sick and the other absent.

Vincent denies both the transfer and the payment; but, while he insists that the debt of the company to Sturm was paid, he does not pretend to say how it was paid, unless by *414this deduction, and a letter of his proves the transfer.

Conceding that the company, as a company, did not consent to release defendant from his obligation on the stock, what difference does that make, when the debt has been paid? Plaintiff concedes that defendant had the right to transfer his interest in the company to Sturm.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be set aside, and that plaintiff’s suit be dismissed, with costs in both courts.
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.32 Detection of Brucella contamination. The test for detection of Brucella contamination provided in this section shall be conducted when such a test is prescribed in an applicable Standard Requirement or in a filed Outline of Production for the product. ( a ) One ml of the minced tissue used as the source of cells or 1 ml of the extract of the tissue prior to the addition of antibiotics, diluent and stabilizer, shall be inoculated onto each of three tryptose agar plates and incubated in a 10 percent CO2 atmosphere at a temperature of 35-37 °C for at least 7 days.
( b ) If colonies are identified as Brucella, the biological product is unsatisfactory.
( c ) If colonies suspicious of Brucella are observed but cannot be identified as a Brucella species, either ( 1 ) The biological product shall be regarded as unsatisfactory and destroyed; or
( 2 ) Further subculture or other procedures shall be carried out until a positive identification can be made.
[38 FR 29888, Oct. 30, 1973]
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.181 What definitions apply to this subpart? *Indian contractor* means: ( 1 ) In California, subcontractors of the California Rural Indian Health Board, Inc. or, subject to approval of the IHS Director after consultation with the DHHS Office of General Counsel, subcontractors of an Indian tribe or tribal organization which are: ( i ) Governed by Indians eligible to receive services from the Indian Health Service;
( ii ) Which carry out comprehensive IHS service programs within geographically defined service areas; and
( iii ) Which are selected and identified through tribal resolution as the local provider of Indian health care services.
( 2 ) Subject to the approval of the IHS Director after consultation with the DHHS Office of General Counsel, Indian tribes and tribal organizations which meet in all respects the requirements of the Indian Self-Determination Act to contract directly with the Federal Government but which choose through tribal resolution to subcontract to carry out IHS service programs within geographically defined service areas with another Indian tribe or tribal organization which contracts directly with IHS.
( 3 ) Any other contractor that qualifies as an “Indian contractor” under the Indian Self-Determination Act.
### §4311. Credit unions

#### (a) In general

No regulation prescribed by the Bureau under this chapter shall apply directly with respect to any depository institution described in clause (iv) of section 461(b)(1)(A) of this title.

#### (b) Regulations prescribed by NCUA

Within 90 days of the effective date of any regulation prescribed by the Bureau under this chapter, the National Credit Union Administration Board shall prescribe a regulation substantially similar to the regulation prescribed by the Bureau taking into account the unique nature of credit unions and the limitations under which they may pay dividends on member accounts.

(Pub. L. 102–242, title II, §272, Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2342; Pub. L. 102–550, title XVI, §1604(e)(2)(P), (Q), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4084; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1100B(1), (3), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2109, 2110.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–203, §1100B(1), substituted "Bureau" for "Board".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–203, §1100B(3), substituted "regulation prescribed by the Bureau" for "regulation prescribed by the Board" in two places.

1992—Pub. L. 102–550 made technical amendment to references to "this chapter" wherever appearing to reflect correction of corresponding provision of original act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–550 effective as if included in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, Pub. L. 102–242, as of Dec. 19, 1991, see section 1609(a) of Pub. L. 102–550, set out as a note under section 191 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection
with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), we, the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the
                                         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                                         and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
                                         fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                                         of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 29, 2016



By: /s/ Michael Scott Maguire

Michael Scott Maguire

Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11798-11799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4825]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections

[[Page 11799]]

552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel; Animal Models.
    Date: March 15, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy I, 6701 
Democracy Blvd., 1078, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Steven Birken, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., 10th Fl., Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1078, [email protected].
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA Coordinating Center.
    Date: March 28, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy I, 6701 
Democracy Blvd., 1064, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Guo Zhang, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Dem. 1, Room 1064, MSC 
4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, 301-435-0812, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333; 93.702, 
ARRA Related Construction Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: February 25, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4825 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.37 What provisions of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circulars or the “common rule” apply to self-determination contracts?

The only provisions of OMB Circulars and the only provisions of the “common rule” that apply to self-determination contracts are the provisions adopted in these regulations, those expressly required or modified by the Act, and those negotiated and agreed to in a self-determination contract.
#### *The Mars. *(a)*
      **United States *v.*The Brigantine Mars.

*Forfeiture. —Bona fide purchaser.*

A forfeiture under the 3d section of 28th June 1809, oh. 9, will overreach a *bond fide*sale V, • purchaser, for a valuable consideration, without notice of the offence.

The Mars, 1 Gallis. 191, reversed.

This was an appeal from the sentence of the Circuit Court of Massacdusetts district, which affirmed the sentence of the district court, restoring the brig to the claimants.

An information was filed against the brig Mars, for a breach of the act of 28th of June 1800 (entitled “ an act to amend and continue in foice certain parts of the act, entitled an act to interdict the commercial intei course,” *&c.),*in departing from port without having given bond according to the 3d section of the act, which provides, that “ if any ship or vessel shall, contrary to the provisions of this section, depart from any port of the United States, without clearance, or without having given bond in the mannet .toove mentioned, such ship or vessel, together with her cargo, shall be wholly forfeited.”

The vessel, after her return to the United States, and bet seizure, was *264
      *bond fide*purchased by the claimants, for a full and valuable consideration, without notice of the offence. Upon this ground, she was, by the decree of the district court, ordered to be restored ; which decree was affirmed by the circuit court. Judge Story’s opinion in pronouncing that decree, will be found in the preceding case of the *United States*v. 1960 *Bags of Coffee.*This case having been submitted upon the arguments which were had in that case—

**March 15th, 1814.

Johnson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court, as follows : — This case depends upon the principle established in the case against the coffee, the Bohlens, claimants, *(a)*
      ***The decision, as in that case, was founded r*. 1 „ upon the ground of a sale to a *bond fide*purchaser, without notice. *- The decree of the circuit court of Massachusetts district, in this case, is, therefore, reversed, and the brigantine Mars adjudged forfeited to the United States.

Decree reversed.

**The case of the United States v. 1960 Bags of Coffee, *ante,*p. 898.
# C_2006310EN.01001301.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/13

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2006 — Staboli v Commission

(Case T-281/04) (1)

1

(Staff case - Pursuit of an outside activity - Participation in conferences as a speaker - Agreement - Application for the grant of special leave for training purposes - Refusal)

(2006/C 310/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Paola Staboli (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decisions of 12 March and 6 April 2004 rejecting her complaint brought against the decision of 9 May 2003, in so far as the institution refused to grant her special leave for training purposes to enable her to pursue an outside activity, which was moreover authorised by that decision, and, so far as necessary, annulment of the abovementioned decision of 9 May 2003.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---