alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                    0001062760
<NAME>                                   Gateway Distributors, LTD>
<MULTIPLIER>                             1
<CURRENCY>                               U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          2,880
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   58,552
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     392,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                484,002
<PP&E>                          425,388
<DEPRECIATION>                 (318,875)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,467,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,190,944
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10,797
<OTHER-SE>                     (3,267,797)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,467,300
<SALES>                         1,328,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,328,566
<CGS>                           231,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,608,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                5,277
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             (72,484)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (347,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (347,580)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                   (347,580)
<EPS-BASIC>                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (.04)



</TABLE>
# C_2007071EN.01002801.xml

| 28.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/28

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.4504 — SFR/TELE 2 France)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 71/08)

On 19 March 2007, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 — 296 72 44) or by post, under reference COMP/M.4504 — SFR/TELE 2 France, to the following address:

| Commission of the European Communities |
| --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70 |
| B-1000 Brussels |

Commission of the European Communities

Competition DG

Merger Registry

Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70

B-1000 Brussels

---
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.608

## Section §107.608: General registration requirements

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.608 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
#### In the Matter of the Application of Sophie Marchais La Grave to Examine Frank J. Herbert and Others, etc.

Motion granted. Present — Woodward, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER II—IMPROVED ACQUISITION PROCESS AND PROCEDURES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §108(c)(3), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4210, inserted subchapter II designation and heading.
### Docket Number: FAA - 2014- 0139
**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  7/13/2012 **Regional Airline Association** 7/ 13/2012 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  7/13/2012 **ATA Joe White**  7/13/2012
# C_2007117EN.01000101.xml

| 26.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/1

---

(2007/C 117/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 95, 28.4.2007

OJ C 95, 28.4.2007

Past publications

OJ C 82, 14.4.2007

OJ C 69, 24.3.2007

OJ C 56, 10.3.2007

OJ C 42, 24.2.2007

OJ C 20, 27.1.2007

OJ C 331, 30.12.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2010346EN.01003403.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/34

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Centrale — Sezione di Bologna (Italy) lodged on 19 October 2010 — Ufficio IVA di Piacenza v Belvedere Costruzioni Srl

(Case C-500/10)

()

2010/C 346/59

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Centrale — Sezione di Bologna

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ufficio IVA di Piacenza

Applicant:

Defendant: Belvedere Costruzioni Srl

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 10 of the EC Treaty, now Article 4 of the Treaty on European Union, read in conjunction with Articles 2 and 22 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes, preclude [legislation such as] the legislation of the Italian State laid down in Article 3(2a) of Decree-Law No 40 of 25 March 2010, converted into Law No 73 of 22 May 2010, under which the court with jurisdiction in tax matters may not rule on the existence of an alleged tax debt which the Tax Authority has sought, in due time, to recover by appealing against an unfavourable decision and which thus in effect provides for the VAT debt at issue to be wholly waived in cases where the courts have ruled both at first instance and at the first level of appeal that such a debt does not exist, without the taxable person in favour of whom the waiver has operated having to pay even a fraction of the debt at issue?

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

            <ARTICLE> 5
                    <S> <C>
            <LEGEND>
            THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
            EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30, 1997 BALANCE SHEET
            AND THE TWELVE MONTH STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS ENDED
            JUNE 30, 1997 FOR THE VERMONT TEDDY BEAR CO., INC.
            AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
            FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
            </LEGEND>
            <MULTIPLIER> 1
            <S>                                <C>
            <PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
            <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   JUN-30-1997
            <PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1997

            <CASH>                                  441,573
            <SECURITIES>                                  0
            <RECEIVABLES>                            46,304
            <ALLOWANCES>                                  0
            <INVENTORY>                           3,302,313
            <CURRENT-ASSETS>                      4,436,153
            <PP&E>                               12,417,891
            <DEPRECIATION>                        2,571,956
            <TOTAL-ASSETS>                       14,649,436
            <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 7,316,738
            <BONDS>                               4,128,908
            <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
            <PREFERRED>                             910,245
            <COMMON>                                258,638
            <OTHER-SE>                            5,322,746
            <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         14,649,436
            <SALES>                              16,489,482
            <TOTAL-REVENUES>                     16,489,482
            <CGS>                                 7,068,549
<PAGE>





            <TOTAL-COSTS>                         7,068,549
            <OTHER-EXPENSES>                     10,911,217
            <LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
            <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      411,498
            <INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,901,782)
            <INCOME-TAX>                                  0
            <INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1,973,782)
            <DISCONTINUED>                                0
            <EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
            <CHANGES>                                     0
            <NET-INCOME>                         (1,973,782)
            <EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.38)
            <EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.38)
                    
            
</TABLE>
§ 111.15 Motions to quash or modify a subpoena (52 U.S.C. 30107(a)(3), (4)). ( a ) Any person to whom a subpoena is directed may, prior to the time specified therein for compliance, but in no event more than 5 days after the date of receipt of such subpoena, apply to the Commission to quash or modify such subpoena, accompanying such application with a brief statement of the reasons therefor. Motions to quash shall be filed with the General Counsel.
( b ) The Commission may deny the application or quash the subpoena or modify the subpoena.
( c ) The person subpoenaed and the General Counsel may agree to change the date, time, or place of a deposition or for the production of records without affecting the force and effect of the subpoena, but such agreements shall be confirmed in writing.
[45 FR 15120, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 50778, Dec. 12, 1985; 82 FR 60853, Dec. 26, 2017; 89 FR 217, Jan. 2, 2024]
§ 111.3 Initiation of compliance matters (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(1), (2)). ( a ) Compliance matters may be initiated by a complaint or on the basis of information ascertained by the Commission in the normal course of carrying out its supervisory responsibilities.
( b ) Matters initiated by complaint are subject to the provisions of 11 CFR 111.4 through 111.7. Matters initiated on the basis of information ascertained by the Commission in the normal course of carrying out its supervisory responsibilities are subject to the provisions of 11 CFR 111.8. All compliance matters are subject to the provisions of 11 CFR 111.2 and 111.9 through 111.23.
### §2153. Voluntary retirement after thirty years' service

Any regular commissioned officer who has completed thirty years' service may, upon his own application, in the discretion of the Secretary, be retired from active service.1

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 187, §292; amended Pub. L. 99–348, title II, §205(b)(5), July 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 700; renumbered §2153, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §112(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 292 of this title as this section.

1986—Pub. L. 99–348 which directed that ", with retired pay of the grade with which retired" be struck out was executed by striking out that phrase after "from active service" as the probable intent of Congress even though there was no comma before "with retired".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Retired Pay on or Prior to September 24, 1963

Savings provisions in section 5(g) of Pub. L. 88–130, providing that Pub. L. 88–130 does not affect the retired pay of anyone retired on or prior to Sept. 24, 1963, are set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.

1 See 1986 Amendment note below.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Number: 33-92146

American Southwest Financial Securities Corporation issuer in
respect of Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 1996-FHA1
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			0742739
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

2390 Camelback Road Suite 223, Phoenix, AZ 85016
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

212-526-5594
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 2000.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2000.

Not applicable.
# C_2007082EN.01004101.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/41

---

Action brought on 5 February 2007 — Denka International v Commission

(Case T-30/07)

(2007/C 82/90)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Denka International BV (Barneveld, The Netherlands) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, C. Mereu, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annulment of Article 2(b) and Annex II of Commission Directive 2006/92/EC; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of Article 2(b) and Annex II of Commission Directive 2006/92/EC; and

| — | order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings, as well as interests thereof. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings, as well as interests thereof.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of its application, the applicant seeks partial annulment of Commission Directive 2006/92/EC (1), of 9 November 2006, amending Annexes to Council Directives 76/895/EEC, 86/362/EEC and 90/642/EEC as regards maximum residue levels for dichlorvos (hereinafter the ‘the MRL Directive ’or ‘the contested measure’) and in particular its Article 2(b) and Annex II thereof.

1

The applicant claims that these provisions modify the maximum residue level for the substance at stake from the previously applicable 2 mg/kg to a new threshold value of 0.01 mg/kg based on an underlying assessment of the applicant's dossier conducted under the related assessment of Directive 91/414/EEC (hereinafter, ‘PPPD’) that is procedurally, scientifically and legally flawed.

Procedurally, the applicant submits that the contested measure was adopted in violation of the procedural safeguards set out in Article 8 of Regulation 451/2000 and the auditum alteram partem principle or principle to a fair hearing, while it also infringes the duty to state reasons (Article 235 EC). In addition, the applicant claims that through the adoption of the contested measure the Commission misused its powers, as it achieved the same objective as a decision of non-inclusion without having recourse to such decision.

auditum alteram partem

From a substantive legal standpoint, the contested measure is allegedly based on a manifest error of assessment and violates, according to the applicant (i) Article 4(1)(f) of Directive 91/414/EEC, (ii) Article 5 of the MRL Directive, as well as (iii) fundamental principles of Community law, namely (a) legitimate expectations and legal certainty, (b) Article 211 EC and the principle of sound administration, and (c) the principle of proportionality.

---

(1)  Commission Directive 2006/92/EC of 9 November 2006 amending annexes to Council Directives 76/895/EEC, 86/362/EEC and 90/642/EEC as regards maximum levels for captan, dichlorvos, ethion and folpet (OJ, L 311, p. 31).

1

---
§ 5.1 General provisions. ( a ) ( 1 ) This subpart contains the rules that the Department of Homeland Security follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended.
( 2 ) The rules in this subpart should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget at 52 FR 10012 (March 27, 1987) (hereinafter “OMB Guidelines”). Additionally, DHS has additional policies and procedures relevant to the FOIA process. These resources are available at *http://www.dhs.gov/freedom-information-act-foia .* Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed under subpart B of part 5 as well as under this subpart.
( b ) As referenced in this subpart, component means the FOIA office of each separate organizational entity within DHS that reports directly to the Office of the Secretary.
( c ) DHS has a decentralized system for processing requests, with each component handling requests for its records.
( d ) *Unofficial release of DHS information.* The disclosure of exempt records, without authorization by the appropriate DHS official, is not an official release of information; accordingly, it is not a FOIA release. Such a release does not waive the authority of the Department of Homeland Security to assert FOIA exemptions to withhold the same records in response to a FOIA request. In addition, while the authority may exist to disclose records to individuals in their official capacity, the provisions of this part apply if the same individual seeks the records in a private or personal capacity.
### §4. Functions of Secretary; regulations; delegation

The Secretary shall perform the functions and duties imposed upon him by this title, may issue such rules and regulations as he deems necessary to carry out such functions and duties, and may delegate the performance of such functions and duties and the authority to issue such rules and regulations to such officers and employees of the Department of Commerce as he may designate.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1013; Pub. L. 94–521, §3(a), Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2459.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Section is new, and was inserted to conform with 1950 Reorganization Plan No. 5, effective May 24, 1950, §§1, 2, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, which is set out as a note under section 591 of title 5, U. S. C., 1952 ed., Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees [now set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees]. That plan transferred all functions (with a few exceptions not applicable to the Census Bureau) of all agencies, officers and employees of the Department of Commerce to the Secretary of Commerce, and vested power in him to delegate the functions so transferred, or any of his other functions, to such agencies, officers or employees within the Department as he designates.

See, also, section 253 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., which provided for delegation of functions in connection with the quinquennial censuses of governments, and authorized the Secretary to promulgate rules and regulations with respect to such censuses. That section has been omitted from this revised title, as the provision thereof for delegation of functions is covered by this section, and the provision thereof which related to rules and regulations is covered by section 22 of title 1, U.S.C., 1952 ed., General Provisions.

Because of the transfer effected by 1950 Reorganization Plan No. 5, referred to above, sections of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., which prescribed functions of the Bureau of the Census, the Census Office, or the Director of the Census, have, in this revised title, been changed to refer to the Secretary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–521 inserted "regulations;" in section catchline, authorized the Secretary to issue such rules and regulations as he deems necessary to carry out the functions and duties imposed upon him by this title, authorized delegation of authority to issue such rules and regulations to officers and employees of the Department of Commerce, and struck out a provision which allowed delegation of performance of such functions and duties to bureaus and agencies of the Department of Commerce.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–521 effective Oct. 17, 1976, see section 17 of Pub. L. 94–521, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.