alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007069EN.01000603.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/6

---

Action brought on 16 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-10/07)

(2007/C 69/12)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren, G. Rozet, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/74/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 80/987/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer (1), or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/74/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 80/987/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer (1), or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2002/74/EC expired on 8 October 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 270, 2002, p. 10.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS






     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 10, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of United Video Satellite Group, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996,
in the following registration statements and related prospectuses.


     Stock Option Plan for       Form S-8       File No. 33-72272
     Non-Employee Directors,
     The Equity Incentive
     Plan and the Stock
     Option Assumption
     Agreements of United
     Video Satellite
     Group, Inc.

     United Video Satellite      Form S-8       File No. 333-2866
     Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan







                                     Ernst & Young LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
March 26, 1997
Exhibit 4.30
 Univision Communications Inc.
 
   Agreement Televisa Grupo Televisa Univision Sales Agency
Agreement IPRA Amendment Side Letter
  References to Agreements under Sales Agency Agreement, IPRA Amendment and Side
Letter
 Effect on Sales Agency Agreement, IPRA Amendment and Side Letter
 Miscellaneous
 Signature page follows




---



##### 



UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC.By:

/s/
Andrew W. HobsonName:
    Andrew W. HobsonTitle:
    Senior Executive Vice President   By:
    
    /s/ Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoName: Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoTitle:   Attorney-in-FactBy:
    
    /s/ Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzName: Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzTitle:   Attorney-in-Fact
  By:
    
    /s/ Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoName: Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoTitle:   Attorney-in-FactBy:
    
    /s/ Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzName: Joaquín Balcárcel Santa CruzTitle:   Attorney-in-Fact
§ 151.7 Examination of animal. ( a ) For the purpose of determining identity, an examination shall be made by an inspector of each animal for which free entry is claimed under the act. All animals shall be examined at the port of entry: *Provided, however,* That dogs, other than those regulated under § 92.600 of this chapter, and cats may be examined either at the port of entry or at any other port where customs entry is made.
( b ) The owner, agent, or importer shall provide adequate assistance and facilities for restraining and otherwise handling the animal and present it in such manner and under such conditions as in the opinion of the inspector will make a proper examination possible. Otherwise, the examination of the animal will be refused or postponed by the inspector until the owner, agent, or importer meets these requirements.
( c ) A pedigree certificate, as required by § 151.4 shall be presented at the time of examination to the inspector making the examination in order that proper identification of the animal may be made. When upon such examination of any animal, the color, markings, or other identifying characteristics do not conform with the description given in the pedigree certificate and the owner, agent, or importer desires to pursue the matter further, the inspector shall issue ANH Form 17-419 to the owner, agent, or importer, and shall forward the pedigree certificate for this animal, together with ANH Form 17-419, to the Washington office of APHIS by certified mail. A determination will be made by such office as to the identity of the animal in question and the eligibility of the animal for certification under § 151.2. The pedigree certificate will be returned to the party who submitted it as soon as such determination is made. Removal of an animal from the port where examination is made prior to presentation of the pedigree certificate or other failure to comply with the requirements of this paragraph shall constitute a waiver of any further claim to certification under the regulations in this part.
[26 FR 6072, July 7, 1961, as amended at 54 FR 34970, Aug. 23, 1989; 55 FR 31562, Aug. 2, 1990]
**Minnesota Rural Development State Office**375 Jackson Street | Suite 410St. Paul, MN 55101(651) 602-7800

**Questions about Multifamily Housing Programs?** Call 1-800-292-8293

                          -    - State DirectorColleen Landkamer (View Bio)
 
                          -                      View All State Contacts                   
                          -                        Follow the RD Minnesota Office on X                     
                          -                        Receive Emails Through GovDelivery                     

## Highlights and Announcements

                                -    PUBLIC NOTICE OF CHANGES TO ELIGIBLE AREA MAPS FOR USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT H... 
                                -    Disaster Assistance Funding Available for Eligible MN Counties 
                                -    Find Available Rural Rental Housing 
                                -    Map of available Revolving Loan Funds in Minnesota 

### Featured Programs

                          -  Community Facilities Direct Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Single Family Housing Direct Home Loans 
                          -  Water & Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Single Family Housing Repair Loans & Grants 
                          -  Value-Added Producer Grants 
                          -  Rural Energy for America Program Renewable Energy Systems & Energy Efficiency Improvement Guaranteed Loans & Grants 
View All State Programs

### Resources

**Check Eligibility**Check a home, town or service location to verify eligibility for Rural Programs

**Manage your USDA Loan**You can create an account and manage your current loan through the Customer Service Center (CSC) portal. You can also contact the CSC at 800-414-1226
View All Resources

## Rural Development News

                                -  USDA Invests $2 Million in Clean Energy to Strengthen Farms and Businesses in Rural MinnesotaApr 01, 2024 
                                -  USDA Officials Visit Alexandria, Minnesota to Celebrate Electric Infrastructure InvestmentMar 14, 2024 
                                -  USDA Invests $87 Million in Projects to Expand Affordable, Reliable, Clean Power in Rural MinnesotaMar 06, 2024 
                                -  USDA Invests $46 Million to Strengthen Water and Wastewater Infrastructure in Rural MinnesotaFeb 26, 2024 
                                -  USDA Invests $6.5 Million in Clean Energy to Strengthen Minnesota Farms and BusinessesFeb 05, 2024 
                                -  Biden-Harris Administration Partners with Public Utilities and Rural Community Leaders to Improve Infrastructure and Support Minnesota's Local Food Supply ChainAug 28, 2023 

View All State News
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.46 Detection of cytopathogenic and/or hemadsorbing agents. The tests for detection of cytopathogenic and/or hemadsorbing agents provided in this section shall be conducted when prescribed in an applicable Standard Requirement or in the filed Outline of Production for a product. ( a ) *Test for cytopathogenic agents.* One or more monolayers that are at least 6 cm2 and at least 7 days from the last subculture shall be tested as provided in this paragraph. ( 1 ) Stain each monolayer with a suitable cytological stain.
( 2 ) Examine the entire area of each stained monolayer for evidence of inclusion bodies, abnormal number of giant cells, or other cytopathology indicative of cell abnormalities attributable to an extraneous agent.
( b ) *Test for hemadsorbing agents.* One or more monolayers that are at least 6 cm2 and at least 7 days from the last subculture shall be tested as provided in this paragraph. ( 1 ) Wash the monolayer with several changes of phosphate buffered saline.
( 2 ) Add an appropriate volume of a 0.2 percent red blood cell suspension to uniformly cover the surface of the monolayer of cultured cells. Suspensions of washed guinea pig and chicken red blood cells shall be used. These suspensions may be mixed before addition to the monolayer or they may be added separately to individual monolayers.
( 3 ) Incubate the monolayer at 4 °C for 30 minutes, wash with phosphate buffered saline, and examine for hemadsorption.
( 4 ) If no hemadsorption is apparent, repeat step (b)(2) of this section and incubate the monolayers at 20-25 °C for 30 minutes, wash with phosphate buffered saline, and examine again for hemadsorption. If desired, separate monolayers may be used for each incubation temperature.
( c ) If specific cytopathology or hemadsorption attributable to an extraneous agent is found, the material under test is unsatisfactory and shall not be used to prepare biological products. If an extraneous agent is suspected because of cytopathology or hemadsorption and cannot be eliminated as a possibility by additional testing, the material under test is unsatisfactory.
[50 FR 441, Jan. 4, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 50252, Sept. 27, 1993]
#### GIBBS, Administratrix De Bonis Non With the Will Annexed of Sommers, Movant, v. CITIZENS SAVINGS BANK, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 16, 1939.

Albert Karnes for movant.

J. D. Mosquot, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
§ 83.34 What notice of the proposed finding will OFA provide? In addition to publishing notice of the proposed finding in the Federal Register, OFA will: ( a ) Provide copies of the proposed finding and any supporting reports to the petitioner and those listed in § 83.22(d); and
( b ) Publish the proposed finding and reports on the OFA Web site.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0406

_________________ CITY OF WHITEFISH,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMAS CURRAN,

Defendant and Appellant, O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant t o the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to the Court sitting en banc. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Heidi J. Ulbricht , District Judge . Fo r the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 1 2023

03/01/2023
Case Number: DA 21-0406
§ 126.9 Scope of review. ( a ) A TSOB Review Panel reviews an ALJ's decision to address whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record before the TSOB Review Panel.
( b ) A TSOB Review Panel will not consider the constitutionality of any statute, regulation, Executive order, or order issued by the TSA.
exv10w12






Exhibit 10.12









Ref:



Ref: Global Banking — Consumer and Retail Group (Level 18)



Strictly Private & Confidential

The Talbots Inc

The Talbot’s Group, Limited Partnership

c/o 175 Beal Street

Hingham MA 02043-9982

USA




	 	 	 	 	 
	     Attn:

	 	Mr Edward L Larsen
	 	21 April 2008
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer	 	 






Dear Mr Larsen



Re : Withdrawal of Banking Facilities





Further to our recent discussions, and to our withdrawal letter dated 8 April 2008, we are
pleased to confirm that your proposed changes to the reduction schedule are acceptable to us.
Thus, the following reduction schedule will become effective immediately upon our receipt of
your acknowledgement of this letter:


Uncommitted Import Letter of Credit Facility




	 	 	 	 	 
	Amount	 	 	 	 
	Outstanding	 	Previous Limit	 	New Limit
	USD43,253,935.61

	 	USD60,000,000.-
	 	USD60,000,000.-*







 



* This Uncommitted Import Letter of Credit Facility Limit will be reduced to USD40,000,000.- on 9
June 2008, USD20,000,000.- on
8 July 2008 and be cancelled
on 8 August 2008.




Any further advances we may approve will be considered on a case by case basis and will be at our
absolute discretion.




The amounts currently outstanding, and any further advances we may grant from time to time, will
remain subject to our customary overriding right of repayment upon demand and will continue to be
subject to any security held by ourselves.




Nothing in this letter should be construed as waiving any of our rights all of which we
hereby expressly reserve.



The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited




Hong Kong
Main Office: 1 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong

Tel: 2822 1111 Fax:

Telex: 73205 HSBC HK Telegrams: Hongbank Hongkong

Web: www.hsbc.com.hk


















 










Ref:





Please acknowledge your acceptance of the abovementioned arrangements by signing the
duplicate of this letter and returning it to us. Should we not receive your acknowledgement by 5
May 2008, the reduction schedule set out in our previous letter of 8 April 2008 will continue to
apply.




Yours faithfully



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Oliver
JonesOliver jones

Regional Relationship Manager

	 	 







ACKNOWLEDGEMENT


The Talbots Inc hereby acknowledges its acceptance of the reduction schedule and other
arrangements set out in this letter.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Edward L. Larsen
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Signed for and on behalf of The Talbot Inc by its Authroised Signatory
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Edward L. Larsen	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Sr. VP & CFO	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	April 24, 2008	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Date	 	 






The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited

Hong Kong Main Office: 1 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong

Tel: 2822 1111 Fax:

Telex: 73205 HSBC HK Telegrams: Hongbank Hongkong

Web: www.hsbc.com.hk
-  Home 
-  Training 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Outreach & Engagement 
                      -  Training Requirements for Industry 
                      -  Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG) 
                      -  Workshops 
                      -  Webinars 
                      -  Community Liaisons (CLs) 
                      -  Publications 
                      -  Publicaciones (en español) 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  Training Modules 
                      -  Videos and Mobile Apps 
                      -  Contact Us 

# Videos and Mobile Apps

## Videos

## Mobile Applications
#### § 310.7 Application of mark.

All marks shall be applied to the article with a rubber stamp to be furnished by the Indian Arts and Crafts Board. Each stamp shall bear a distinctive letter and may be used only by the person to whom it has been issued. With the addition of the distinctive letter, each stamp shall read:

( )

Hand-Made

Alaskan Eskimo

U S

Indian Arts & Crafts Board

I D

or, in the case of articles too small to carry this stamp:

( )

U S I D

Alaskan Eskimo

On baskets and fabrics which offer no surface for the application of such a rubber stamp, the stamp shall be placed on a paper tag attached to the article by a wire caught in a lead seal disc that shall be impressed and made fast with a hand seal press furnished by the Indian Arts and Crafts Board.
§ 147.52 Authorized laboratories. These minimum requirements are intended to be the basis on which an authorized laboratory of the Plan can be evaluated to ensure that official Plan assays are performed in accordance with the NPIP Program Standards or other procedures approved by the Administrator in accordance with § 147.53(d)(1) and reported as described in paragraph (f) of this section. A satisfactory evaluation will result in the laboratory being recognized by the NPIP office of the Service as an authorized laboratory qualified to perform the assays provided for in this part. ( a ) *Check-test proficiency.* The NPIP will serve as the lead agency for the coordination of available check tests from the National Veterinary Services Laboratories. Further, the NPIP may approve and authorize additional laboratories to produce and distribute a check test as needed. The authorized laboratory must use the next available check test for each assay that it performs.
( b ) *Trained technicians.* Testing procedures at all authorized laboratories must be run or overseen by a laboratory technician who every 4 years has attended, and satisfactorily completed, Service-approved laboratory workshops for Plan-specific diseases.
( c ) *Laboratory protocol.* Official Plan assays must be performed and reported as described in the NPIP Program Standards or in accordance with other procedures approved by the Administrator in accordance with § 147.53(d)(1). Assays must be performed using control reagents approved by the Plan or the reagent manufacturer.
( d ) *State site visit.* The Official State Agency will conduct a site visit and recordkeeping audit at least once every 2 years. This will include, but may not be limited to, review of technician training records, check test proficiency, and test results. The information from the site visit and recordkeeping audit will be made available to the NPIP upon request.
( e ) *Service review.* Authorized laboratories will be reviewed by the Service (NPIP staff) every 3 years. The Service's review may include, but will not necessarily be limited to, checking records, laboratory protocol, check-test proficiency, technician training, and peer review.
( f ) *Reporting.* ( 1 ) A memorandum of understanding or other means shall be used to establish testing and reporting criteria to the Official State Agency, including criteria that provide for reporting H5 and H7 low pathogenic avian influenza directly to the Service.
( 2 ) *Salmonella pullorum* and *Mycoplasma* Plan disease reactors must be reported to the Official State Agency within 48 hours.
( g ) *Verification.* Random samples may also be required to be submitted for verification as specified by the Official State Agency.
[79 FR 38766, July 9, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 53251, Aug. 12, 2016; 83 FR 28355, June 19, 2018; 85 FR 62572, Oct. 5, 2020]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7708

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. NICK HALTEH, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00068-GBL-1; 1:08-cv-00534-GBL)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nick Halteh, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nick Halteh seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. MillerEl v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Halteh has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED