alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                        EXHIBIT 11


          COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON
               AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
For the three months ended November 30, 1997 and November
                         30, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               November       November
                                                 1997           1996

<S>                                            <C>            <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
  Shares*


     Average shares outstanding                34,478,79      34,142,3
                                                       5            40

     Net average additional shares
outstanding
     assuming dilutive stock options
exercised
     and proceeds used to purchase treasury
stock
     at average market price                   1,582,953      1,407,20
                                                                     8


     Average number of common and common
     equivalent shares outstanding             36,061,74      35,549,5
                                                       8            48



  Net Earnings


     Net earnings for primary earnings per     $2,712,00      $2,065,0
share                                                  0            00



Primary Earnings Per Share*                        $0.08         $0.06



*Earnings per share and all share amounts have been adjusted to
reflect the two-for-one split of the
  Common Stock to holders of record July 25, 1997.
</TABLE>
### §§101 to 110. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(e)(5)–(11), (f)(2)–(4)(A), (g)(9), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2292, 2294

Section 101, acts Mar. 14, 1900, ch. 41, §12, 31 Stat. 49; Oct. 5, 1917, ch. 74, §2, 40 Stat. 342, provided for delivery of circulating notes in blank to national banking associations depositing bonds with Treasurer of United States.

Section 101a, R.S. §5159; Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §17, 38 Stat. 268; June 21, 1917, ch. 32, §9, 40 Stat. 239, related to deposit of bonds to secure circulating notes.

Section 102, R.S. §5158, construed term "United States bonds" as including registered bonds.

Section 103, act Oct. 5, 1917, ch. 74, §3, 40 Stat. 342, related to denominations of notes and limitation on amount of $1 and $2 notes.

Section 104, R.S. §5172; May 30, 1908, ch. 229, §11, 35 Stat. 551; Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §27, 38 Stat. 274; Aug. 4, 1914, ch. 225, 38 Stat. 682; Mar. 3, 1919, ch. 101, §4, 40 Stat. 1315, related to printing and form of circulating notes.

Section 105, act June 20, 1874, ch. 343, §5, 18 Stat. 124, provided that Comptroller of Currency was to print charter numbers of association on national bank notes.

Section 106, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, §1, 18 Stat. 372, provided for printing national-bank notes on distinctive paper adopted by Secretary of the Treasury.

Section 107, R.S. §5173, related to custody of plates and dies procured for printing notes and payment of expenses.

Section 108, R.S. §5174; Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, §1, 19 Stat. 252, related to examination of plates, dies, and other material from which national-bank circulation was printed, and destruction of obsolete material.

Section 109, R.S. §5182; Jan. 13, 1920, ch. 38, 41 Stat. 387, provided that banks could issue and circulate notes the same as money if signed by officers in manner of obligatory promissory notes payable on demand at place of business, and specified demands for which such notes were to be received.

Section 110, R.S. §5183; Feb. 18, 1875, ch. 80, §1, 18 Stat. 320, prohibited banks from issuing unauthorized notes.
#### § 39.1203 Future consideration of contract school operation and maintenance funding.

The Assistant Secretary shall arrange for full funding for operation and maintenance of contract schools by fiscal year 1981.
§ 3.90 Care in transit. ( a ) *Surface transportation (ground and water).* Any person subject to the Animal Welfare regulations (9 CFR parts 1, 2, and 3) transporting nonhuman primates in commerce must ensure that the operator of the conveyance or a person accompanying the operator of the conveyance observes the nonhuman primates as often as circumstances allow, but not less than once every 4 hours, to make sure that they have sufficient air for normal breathing, that the ambient temperature is within the limits provided in § 3.88(d) of this subpart, and that all other applicable standards of this subpart are being complied with. The regulated person transporting the nonhuman primates must ensure that the operator or the person accompanying the operator determines whether any of the nonhuman primates are in obvious physical distress, and obtains any veterinary care needed for the nonhuman primates at the closest available veterinary facility.
( b ) *Air transportation.* During air transportation of nonhuman primates, it is the responsibility of the carrier to observe the nonhuman primates as frequently as circumstances allow, but not less than once every 4 hours if the animal cargo area is accessible during flight. If the animal cargo area is not accessible during flight, the carrier must observe the nonhuman primates whenever they are loaded and unloaded and whenever the animal cargo space is otherwise accessible to make sure that the nonhuman primates have sufficient air for normal breathing, that the ambient temperature is within the limits provided in § 3.88(d) of this subpart, and that all other applicable standards of this subpart are being complied with. The carrier must determine whether any of the nonhuman primates is in obvious physical distress, and arrange for any needed veterinary care for the nonhuman primates as soon as possible.
( c ) If a nonhuman primate is obviously ill, injured, or in physical distress, it must not be transported in commerce, except to receive veterinary care for the condition.
( d ) During transportation in commerce, a nonhuman primate must not be removed from its primary enclosure unless it is placed in another primary enclosure or a facility that meets the requirements of § 3.80 or § 3.87 of this subpart. Only persons who are experienced and authorized by the shipper, or authorized by the consignor or the consignee upon delivery, if the animal is consigned for transportation, may remove nonhuman primates from their primary enclosure during transportation in commerce, unless required for the health or well-being of the animal.
( e ) The transportation regulations contained in this subpart must be complied with until a consignee takes physical delivery of the animal if the animal is consigned for transportation, or until the animal is returned to the consignor.
# C_2010274EN.01001901.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/19

---

Action brought on 5 August 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-398/10)

()

2010/C 274/29

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Karanasou-Apostolopoulou and A. Alcover San Pedro, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting the laws, and administrative provisions, necessary to comply with Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) or in any event by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting the laws, and administrative provisions, necessary to comply with Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) or in any event by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2007/2/EC into domestic law expired on 15 May 2009.

---
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Salvi Rafael Folch Viadero, the Chief Financial Officer of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 28, 2017

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Salvi Rafael   Folch Viadero |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                            | Salvi Rafael Folch   Viadero |
|   |   | Title:                           | Chief Financial   Officer |

 

----
# C_2007082EN.01000903.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/9

---

Order of the Court of 26 January 2007 — Elisabetta Righini v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-57/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Temporary staff - Classification by grade and step - Classification in a higher career bracket - Distortion of the facts - Defective statement of reasons - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

(2007/C 82/18)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Elisabetta Righini (represented by E. Boigelot, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by V. Joris and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 15 November 2005 in Case T-145/04 Righini v Commission dismissing the action for annulment of the Commission's decisions to classify the applicant on her entry into service in Grade A7/3 and, in so far as may be necessary, annulment of the decision of 21 January 2004 rejecting the applicant's complaint.

Righini

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Righini is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Righini is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.3.2006.

1

---
§ 130.2 Basis for fees and rates. ( a ) Except as set forth in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, for setting fee rates for each calendar year based upon the previous fiscal year, APHIS will calculate the rates for services as follows: ( 1 ) APHIS will prorate the total Veterinary Services (VS) inspection, certification, or laboratory service program personnel direct pay (on board and in hiring process including benefits) for the previous fiscal year to each fee based upon the direct time factor percentage of employee's average time to perform and complete each fee code process and then multiply by the next year's percentage of cost of living increase.
( 2 ) APHIS will prorate total direct operating costs for the previous fiscal year based upon the direct time factor percentage of employee's average time to perform and complete each fee code process to each fee and then multiply by the anticipated percentage of inflation for the next year.
( 3 ) APHIS will add estimates for Program, Agency, and Department support costs, imputed costs, and reserves by applying a percentage based on information from Program, Agency, and Department officials and the Department of Treasury to the sum of the direct pay plus direct operating costs.
( 4 ) The amounts derived via the process described in this paragraph (a) and paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section will be added and then APHIS will round up to the next $0.25 for all fees less than $10 or round up to the nearest dollar for all fees greater than $10 to develop the new rate for each code.
( b ) If there is no identifiable volume in the previous year for the service provided by the fee, if the fee is rarely charged, or if APHIS cannot readily identify level of effort, APHIS will calculate the fee based on the last available historic data encompassing multiple instances of use and add any intervening inflation, overhead and support costs, imputed costs, and reserve.
( c ) Fees for the exclusive use of space in animal import centers will be calculated using the following formula: ( 1 ) APHIS will calculate fees by using direct employee average time (with benefits) and adding a prorated portion of currently identifiable expenses (facilities, rent, support cost, and admin support costs), program and support overhead expenses, imputed costs, and reserve.
( 2 ) APHIS will combine the costs to determine the monthly cost of providing the service at a single location within the animal import center.
( 3 ) APHIS will calculate the costs of the other locations within the animal import center based on the square footage of the location.
( d ) Services listed in § 130.4 will be charged an hourly rate-based user fee in accordance with the provisions of that section.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0055)
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Expands Eligibility for Tribes Under the Rural Business Development 

Grants Program

Changes Take Effect on Jan. 16, 2024

WASHINGTON, Dec. 14, 2023 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development today 

announced that USDA is expanding eligibility for Tribes under the Rural Business Development Grants

program. This program creates jobs, spurs economic growth and supports enterprise projects in rural and Tribal 

communities.

On Jan. 16, 2024, new and expanded eligibility definitions will take effect under the program to enable more 

Tribal government-owned entities to qualify for funding.

For instance, USDA is:

• Expanding the “Small and Emerging Business” definition to include Tribal governments and Tribalowned organizations,

• Clarifying the definition for “Conflict of Interest” to explain how the agency defines the relationship 

between Tribal nations and their Tribal-owned entities.

• Codifying the “Indian Tribe” and “Tribal” definitions to include Tribal governments and/or Federally 

Recognized Tribes.

For more information, visit page 86566 of the Dec. 14, 2023, Federal Register.

To subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
#### Dorothy M. Juen, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Kenneth J. Juen, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 74-146;

Fifth District

November 14, 1974.

*141Kenneth J. Juen, *pro se.*

Mudge & Riley Law Offices, of Edwardsville, for appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS

delivered the opinion of the court:

The parties here involved were divorced by a decree of the Circuit Court of St. Clair County on April 25, 1972. On September 21, 1973, plaintiff filed a petition to modify the decree as to alimony and child support. After hearing evidence, on April 4, 1974, the Circuit Court of St. Clair County entered an order increasing the amount of alimony and child support. Defendant has appealed, claiming there was no basis for the increase. Plaintiff has cross-appealed, claiming that the amount of the increase was insufficient.

Defendant contends that there was not enough change of conditions shown to justify a modification of the prior decree, nor was there any basis for increasing the amount. Plaintiff contends that the evidence justifies a more substantial increase.

The evidence as to changed circumstances was as follows: At the time of the divorce plaintiff was a full-time clerk-typist with the Kaskaskia Library System. Subsequently the Kaskaskia Library System moved from Belleville to Smithton. Plaintiff testified that due to the move and other circumstances she was forced to terminate this employment, and she is now working part time at approximately one-fourth her former salary. She also testified that as the children were now older their clothing and school expenses were higher. She further testified to higher expenses due to inflation; however, such higher expenses also apply to defendant. There was a conflict in the evidence as to defendant’s earnings, but there was a reasonable basis for the trial court to find that actual earnings for at least 1 year had been considerably above the amount estimated at the time of the divorce.

Without further detailing the evidence, we find that there was a sufficient showing of change of circumstances to warrant a modification of the amount of payments. We also find that the amounts fixed are reasonable under all the circumstances.

Finding no merit in either the appeal or the cross-appeal, the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Clair County is affirmed.

G. MORAN, P. J., and EBERSPACHER, J., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lovince Green, Also Known as Cali, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 719]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Timothy J. Drury, J.), rendered January 26, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.EJ., Martoche, Centra and Pine, JJ.
### §3911. Equal representation for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of Thrift Supervision

#### (a) In general

As one of the 4 Federal bank regulatory and supervisory agencies, and as the insurer of the United States banks involved in international lending, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall be given equal representation with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on the Committee on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices of the Group of Ten Countries and Switzerland.

#### (b) Office of Thrift Supervision

As one of the 4 Federal bank regulatory and supervisory agencies, the Office of Thrift Supervision shall be given equal representation with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on the Committee on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices of the Group of Ten Countries and Switzerland.

(Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IX, §912], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 109–351, title VII, §713(a), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1995.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–351 inserted "and the Office of Thrift Supervision" after "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, substituted "As one of the 4" for "As one of the three", and added subsec. (b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7441

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

OTIS JACKSON, II,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-90-280, CA-97-389)

Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: April 20, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Otis Jackson, II, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States

Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)

and his motion for reconsideraton of that order. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Jackson, Nos. CR-90-280; CA-97-389 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### [§8137. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title V, §509(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3586]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 325, §5587; Pub. L. 90–179, §5(2), Dec. 8, 1967, 81 Stat. 547; Pub. L. 90–386, §1(5), July 5, 1968, 82 Stat. 293; Pub. L. 96–513, title III, §324, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2893; renumbered §8137, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(4), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834, related to regular Navy: officers designated for engineering duty, aeronautical engineering duty, and special duty.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Earnings, and
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts as of and for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 1997 shown elsewhere in this report and is qualified in it's
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<RESTATED> 
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,804,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                   844,312
<INVENTORY>                                 16,201,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,720,643
<PP&E>                                       4,986,867
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,903,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,389,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,726,499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,002
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,981,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,389,352
<SALES>                                     82,598,593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            82,598,593
<CGS>                                       69,723,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,878,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               236,483
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,551,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,010,326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (91,964)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,918,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 476,967
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,441,395)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.86)
        

</TABLE>
# APR 08  1102AM

CDR420

Line-In Record

Other

40.959854