11404 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

(3) Asks us to waive collection of the 

overpayment under section 204(b) of the 

Act. 

* * * * * 

PART 408—SPECIAL BENEFITS FOR 

CERTAIN WORLD WAR II VETERANS 

Subpart I—[Amended] 

4. The authority citation for subpart I 

of part 408 is revised to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 808, and 1147 

of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

902(a)(5), 1008, and 1320b–17); 31 U.S.C. 

3716, 3720A. 

5. Amend § 408.940(b) by revising the 

third sentence to read as follows: 

§ 408.940 When will we refer an SVB 

overpayment to the Department of the 

Treasury for tax refund offset? 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * We refer overpayments to 

the Department of the Treasury for offset 

against Federal tax refunds regardless of 

the amount of time the debts have been 

outstanding. 

6. Amend § 408.941 by revising the 

introductory text, and paragraphs (a) 

and (b) to read as follows: 

§ 408.941 Will we notify you before we 

refer an SVB overpayment for tax refund 

offset? 

Before we request that an 

overpayment be collected by reduction 

of Federal and State income tax refunds, 

we will send a written notice of our 

action to the overpaid person. In our 

notice of intent to collect an 

overpayment through tax refund offset, 

we will state: 

(a) The amount of the overpayment; 

and 

(b) That we will collect the 

overpayment by requesting that the 

Department of the Treasury reduce any 

amounts payable to the overpaid person 

as refunds of Federal and State income 

taxes by an amount equal to the amount 

of the overpayment unless, within 60 

calendar days from the date of our 

notice, the overpaid person: 

(1) Repays the overpayment in full; 

(2) Sends evidence to us at the 

address given in our notice that 

(i) The overpayment is not past due; 

or 

(ii) The overpayment is not legally 

enforceable, or 

(3) Asks us to waive collection of the 

overpayment under section 204(b) of the 

Act. 

* * * * * 

PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL 

SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, 

BLIND, AND DISABLED 

Subpart E—[Amended] 

7. The authority citation for subpart E 

of part 416 is continues to read as 

follows: 

Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1147, 1601, 

1602, 1611(c) and (e), and 1631(a)–(d) and (g) 

of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

902(a)(5), 1320b–17, 1381, 1381a, 1382(c) 

and (e), and 1383(a)–(d) and (g)); 31 U.S.C. 

3716; 31 U.S.C. 3720A. 

8. Amend § 416.580(b) by removing 

the word ‘‘individuals’’ in the second 

sentence and adding in its place 

‘‘persons’’ and by revising the last 

sentence to read as follows: 

§ 416.580 Referral of overpayments to the 

Department of the Treasury for tax refund 

offset—General. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * We refer overpayments to 

the Department of the Treasury for offset 

against Federal tax refunds regardless of 

the amount of time the debts have been 

outstanding. 

9. Amend § 416.581 by revising the 

section heading, the introductory text, 

and paragraphs (a) and (b), and in 

paragraph (e) by removing the word 

‘‘individual’’ in two places and adding in 

its place ‘‘person’’. 

§ 416.581 Notice to overpaid person. 

We will make a request for collection 

by reduction of Federal and State 

income tax refunds only after we 

determine that a person owes an 

overpayment that is past due and 

provide the overpaid person with 

written notice. Our notice of intent to 

collect an overpayment through tax 

refund offset will state: 

(a) The amount of the overpayment; 

and 

(b) That we will seek collection of the 

overpayment by requesting that the 

Department of the Treasury reduce any 

amounts payable to the overpaid person 

as refunds of Federal and State income 

taxes by an amount equal to the amount 

of the overpayment unless, within 60 

calendar days from the date of our 

notice, the overpaid person: 

(1) Repays the overpayment in full; 

(2) Sends evidence to us at the 

address given in our notice that 

(i) The overpayment is not past due; 

or 

(ii) The overpayment is not legally 

enforceable; or 

(3) Asks us to waive collection of the 

overpayment under section 204(b) of the 

Act. 

* * * * * 

PART 422—ORGANIZATION AND 

PROCEDURES 

Subpart D—[Amended] 

10. The authority citation for subpart 

D of part 422 continues to read as 

follows: 

Authority: Secs. 204(f), 205(a), 702(a)(5), 

and 1631(b) of the Social Security Act (42 

U.S.C. 404(f), 405(a), 902(a)(5), and 1383(b)); 

5 U.S.C. 5514; 31 U.S.C. 3711(e); 31 U.S.C. 

3716. 

11. Amend § 422.310 by revising 

paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) to read as 

follows: 

§ 422.310 Collection of overdue debts by 

administrative offset. 

(a) Referral to the Department of the 

Treasury for offset. (1) We recover 

overdue debts by offsetting Federal and 

State payments due the debtor through 

the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). TOP 

is a Government-wide delinquent debt 

matching and payment offset process 

operated by the Department of the 

Treasury, whereby debts owed to the 

Federal Government are collected by 

offsetting them against Federal and State 

payments owed the debtor. Federal 

payments owed the debtor include 

current ‘‘disposable pay,’’ defined in 5 

CFR 550.1103, owed by the Federal 

Government to a debtor who is an 

employee of the Federal Government. 

Deducting from such disposable pay to 

collect an overdue debt owed by the 

employee is called ‘‘Federal salary 

offset’’ in this subpart. 

* * * * * 

(b) Debts we refer. We refer for 

administrative offset all qualifying debts 

that meet or exceed the threshold 

amounts used by the Department of the 

Treasury for collection from State and 

Federal payments, including Federal 

salaries. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–4586 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 281 

[EPA–R10–UST–2011–0097; FRL–9274–8] 

Oregon: Tentative Approval of State 

Underground Storage Tank Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The State of Oregon has 

applied for final approval of its 

Underground Storage Tank (UST) 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules 11405 

Program under Subtitle I of the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). 

EPA has reviewed Oregon’s application 

and made the tentative decision that the 

State’s UST program satisfies all 

requirements necessary to qualify for 

final approval. Today’s Federal Register 

notice solicits comments on the 

proposed rule. 

DATES: Comments and/or request for a 

public hearing on this determination 

must be received on or before April 1, 

2011. A public hearing will be held on 

April 13, 2011 from 9 a.m.–12 p.m. at 

the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency, 805 SW. Broadway, 

Suite 500, Portland, Oregon 97205, 

unless insufficient public interest is 

expressed in holding a hearing. EPA 

reserves the right to cancel the public 

hearing if sufficient public interest in a 

hearing is not communicated to EPA in 

writing by April 1, 2011. EPA will 

determine by April 11, 2011, whether 

there is sufficient interest to warrant a 

public hearing. The State of Oregon will 

be invited to participate in any public 

hearing held by EPA on this subject. 

Please see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, 

Item C, for details. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10– 

UST–2011–0097, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the online instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: griffith.katherine@epa.gov. 

• Mail: Katherine Griffith, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 

900, Mail Stop: OCE–082, Seattle, WA 

98101. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R10–UST–2011– 

0097. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identify 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters or any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy. 

Please see SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION, Item D, for details on the 

location of the documents in hard copy 

form. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Griffith, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 

Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Mail Stop: 

OCE–082, Seattle, WA 98101, phone 

number: (206) 553–2901, e-mail: 

griffith.katherine@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background 

Section 9004 of RCRA enables EPA to 

approve implementation of State UST 

programs in lieu of the Federal UST 

program. Approval is granted when it 

has been determined that the State 

program: (1) Is no less stringent than the 

overall Federal program and includes 

the notification requirements of Section 

9004(a)(8), 42 U.S.C. 6991c(a)(8), and (2) 

provides for adequate enforcement of 

compliance with UST standards of 

Section 9004(a), 42 U.S.C. 6991c(a). 

B. State of Oregon 

The Oregon Department of 

Environmental Quality (ODEQ) is the 

lead implementing agency for the UST 

program in Oregon. ODEQ has broad 

statutory authority to regulate UST 

releases under Oregon Revised Statutes, 

Chapter 183, Administrative Procedures 

Act, Section 310–750; Chapter 465, 

Hazardous Waste and Hazardous 

Materials I (Removal or Remedial 

Action); Chapter 466, Hazardous Waste 

and Hazardous Materials II (Oil Storage 

Tanks); and Chapter 468, Environmental 

Quality Generally (Enforcement and 

Audit Privilege). Specific authority to 

regulate the installation, operation, 

maintenance, and closure of USTs is 

found under ODEQ Administrative 

Rules Chapter 340, Divisions 11, 12, 

122, 150, 151, 160, 162, and 163. 

Oregon is not authorized to carry out 

its UST program in Indian Country. This 

includes all lands within the exterior 

boundaries of the Grande Ronde, 

Klamath, Siletz, Umatilla and Warm 

Springs Reservations; any land held in 

trust by the United States for an Indian 

tribe, and any other lands that are 

Indian Country within the meaning of 

18 U.S.C. 1151. 

C. Requesting a Hearing 

Any request for a public hearing shall 

include: (1) The name, address, and 

telephone number of the individual, 

organization, or other entity requesting 

a hearing, (2) a brief statement of the 

requester’s interest in the Regional 

Administrator’s determination and of 

information that he/she intends to 

submit at such hearing, (3) the signature 

of the requester or responsible official, 

if made on behalf of an organization or 

other entity, and (4) the associated 

Docket ID Number. 

It is EPA’s policy to make reasonable 

accommodation to persons with 

disabilities wishing to participate in the 

Agency’s programs and activities, 

pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 

1973, 29 U.S.C. 791, et seq. Any request 

for accommodation should be made to 

Katherine Griffith, (206) 553–2901, 

preferably a minimum of two weeks in 

advance of the public hearing date, so 

that EPA will have sufficient time to 

process the request. 

Frivolous or insubstantial requests for 

a hearing may be denied by the RA. 

However, if a substantial request is 

made within thirty (30) days after this 

notice, a public hearing will be held. 

Please bring this notice to the attention 

of any persons known by you to have an 

interest in this determination. 

D. Location of Documents 

All documents that are in the 

electronic docket are also available in 

hard copy during normal business hours 

at the following locations: 

1. U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Library, Region 10, 1200 Sixth 

Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 

from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 

4 p.m. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
11406 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

2. Oregon Department of 

Environmental Quality, 811 SW. Sixth 

Avenue, Portland, OR 97204 from 10 

a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. 

3. Oregon Department of 

Environmental Quality, 2146 NE. 4th, 

Suite 104, Bend, OR 97701 from 10 a.m. 

to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. 

4. Oregon Department of 

Environmental Quality, 700 SE. 

Emigrant, Suite 330, Pendleton, OR 

97801 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 

1 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and 

5. Oregon Department of 

Environmental Quality, 221 Stewart 

Ave, Suite 201, Medford, OR 97501 

from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 

4 p.m. 

E. Statutory and Executive Order (EO) 

Review 

This proposed rule only applies to 

Oregon’s UST Program requirements 

pursuant to RCRA Section 9004 and 

imposes no requirements other than 

those imposed by State law. It complies 

with applicable EOs and statutory 

provisions as follows: 

1. Executive Order 12866 

The Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) has exempted this rule from its 

review under Executive Order 12866. 

2. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This proposed action does not impose 

an information collection burden under 

the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., 

because this proposed rule does not 

establish or modify any information or 

recordkeeping requirements for the 

regulated community and only seeks to 

authorize the pre-existing requirements 

under State law and imposes no 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. Burden means 

the total time, effort, or financial 

resources expended by persons to 

generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or 

provide information to or for a Federal 

agency. This includes the time needed 

to review instructions; develop, acquire, 

install, and utilize technology and 

systems for the purposes of collecting, 

validating, and verifying information, 

processing, and maintaining 

information, and disclosing and 

providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements; train personnel to be able 

to respond to a collection of 

information; search data sources; 

complete and review the collection of 

information; and transmit or otherwise 

disclose the information. An Agency 

may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. The OMB control numbers for 

EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR 

are listed in 40 CFR part 9. 

3. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

generally requires Federal agencies to 

prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis 

of any rule subject to notice and 

comment rulemaking requirements 

under the Administrative Procedure Act 

or any other statute unless the agency 

certifies that the rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Small entities include small businesses, 

small organizations, and small 

governmental jurisdictions. For 

purposes of assessing the impacts of 

today’s proposed rule on small entities, 

small entity is defined as: (1) A small 

business defined by the Small Business 

Administration’s size regulations at 13 

CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental 

jurisdiction that is a government of a 

city, county, town, school district, or 

special district with a population of less 

than 50,000; and (3) a small 

organization that is any not-for-profit 

enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. I certify that this 

proposed rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities because the 

proposed rule will only have the effect 

of authorizing pre-existing requirements 

under State law and imposes no 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. EPA continues to 

be interested in the potential impacts of 

the proposed rule on small entities and 

welcomes comments on issues related to 

such impacts. 

4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This proposed rule does not have any 

impacts as described in the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act because this rule 

codifies pre-existing requirements under 

State law and does not impose any 

additional enforceable duty beyond that 

required by State law. It does not 

contain any unfunded mandates or 

significantly or uniquely affects small 

governments. 

5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This proposed rule does not have 

Federalism implications. It will not 

have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among various levels of 

government, as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999). This rule proposes to authorize 

pre-existing State rules. Thus, Executive 

Order 13132 does not apply to this 

proposed rule. In the spirit of Executive 

Order 13132, and consistent with EPA 

policy to promote communications 

between EPA and State and local 

governments, EPA specifically solicits 

comment on this proposed rule from 

State and local officials. 

6. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

Executive Order 13175, entitled 

‘‘Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments’’ (59 FR 

22951, November 9, 2000), requires EPA 

to develop an accountable process to 

ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by 

tribal officials in the development of 

regulatory policies that have tribal 

implications.’’ This proposed rule does 

not have tribal implications, as specified 

in Executive Order 13175 because EPA 

retains its authority over Indian 

Country. Thus, Executive Order 13175 

does not apply to this proposed rule. 

EPA specifically solicits additional 

comment on this proposed rule from 

tribal officials. 

7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 

(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as 

applying only to those regulatory 

actions that concern health or safety 

risks, such that the analysis required 

under section 5–501 of the Executive 

Order has the potential to influence the 

regulation. This action is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045 because it 

proposes to approve a state program. 

8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This proposed rule is not subject to 

Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions 

Concerning Regulations that 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001) because it is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ as defined under 

Executive Order 12866. 

9. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law 

104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272), 

directs EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards in its regulatory activities 

unless to do so would be inconsistent 

with applicable law or otherwise 

impractical. Voluntary consensus 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules 11407 

standards are technical standards (e.g., 

materials specifications, test methods, 

sampling procedures, and business 

practices) that are developed or adopted 

by voluntary consensus bodies. The 

NTTAA directs EPA to provide 

Congress, through OMB, explanations 

when the Agency decides not to use 

available and applicable voluntary 

consensus standards. This proposed 

rulemaking does not involve technical 

standards. Therefore, EPA is not 

considering the use of any voluntary 

consensus standards. 

10. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and Low 

Income Populations 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) establishes Federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

Federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. EPA 

has determined that this proposed rule 

will not have disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects on minority or 

low-income populations. This proposed 

rule does not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment because this rule 

proposes to authorize pre-existing State 

rules which are no less stringent than 

existing Federal requirements. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 281 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Hazardous materials, Intergovernmental 

relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: This notice is issued under the 

authority of Sections 2002(a), 7004(b), and 

9004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as 

amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6974(b), and 

6991c. 

Dated: February 23, 2011. 

Michelle L. Pirzadeh, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4640 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 51, 53, 63, 64 

[CC Docket Nos. 95–20, 98–10, WC Docket 

No. 10–132; FCC 11–15] 

Review of Wireline Competition Bureau 

Data Practices, Computer III Further 

Remand Proceedings: Bell Operating 

Company Provision of Enhanced 

Services 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Commission proposes the removal of 

the narrowband comparably efficient 

interconnection (CEI) and open network 

architecture (ONA) reporting 

requirements that currently apply to the 

Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) due 

to a lack of continuing relevance and 

utility. The Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking continues the 

Commission’s examination of its data 

practices through the Data Innovation 

Initiative, including identification of 

data collections that can be eliminated 

without reducing the effectiveness of 

the Commission’s decision-making 

process. 

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

April 1, 2011 and reply comments are 

due on or before April 18, 2011. Written 

comments on the Paperwork Reduction 

Act proposed or modified information 

collection requirements must be 

submitted by the public, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), and 

other interested parties on or before May 

2, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by WC Docket No.10–132, by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Federal Communications 

Commission’s Web site: http:// 

fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• People with Disabilities: Contact the 

FCC to request reasonable 

accommodations (accessible format 

documents, sign language interpreters, 

CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov 

or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202) 

418–0432. 

For detailed instructions for 

submitting comments and additional 

information on the rulemaking process, 

see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this document. 

In addition to filing comments with 

the Secretary, a copy of any comments 

on the Paperwork Reduction Act 

information collection requirements 

contained herein should be submitted to 

the Federal Communications 

Commission via e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov 

and to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget, via e-mail to 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov or via 

fax at 202–395–5167. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeremy Miller at (202) 418–1507, 

Wireline Competition Bureau, Industry 

Analysis and Technology Division. For 

additional information concerning the 

Paperwork Reduction Act information 

collection requirements contained in 

this document, send an e-mail to 

PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith Boley 

Herman at 202–418–0214. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in CC 

Docket Nos. 95–20, 98–10 and WC 

Docket No. 10–132, adopted and 

released on February 8, 2011. The 

complete text of this document is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

FCC Reference Information Center, 

Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 

CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. The 

document may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 

445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 

378–3160 or (202) 863–2893, facsimile 

(202) 863–2898, or via the Internet at 

http://www.bcpiweb.com. It is also 

available on the Commission’s Web site 

at http://www.fcc.gov. 

Comments and reply comments must 

include a short and concise summary of 

the substantive arguments raised in the 

pleading. Comments and reply 

comments must also comply with 

Section 1.49 and all other applicable 

Sections of the Commission’s rules. We 

direct all interested parties to include 

the name of the filing party and the date 

of the filing on each page of their 

comments and reply comments. All 

parties are encouraged to utilize a table 

of contents, regardless of the length of 

their submission. We also strongly 

encourage parties to track the 

organization set forth in the NPRM in 

order to facilitate our internal review 

process. 

Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 Analysis 

This document proposes to eliminate 

the remaining narrowband BOC-specific 

CEI and ONA reporting requirements, 

and seeks comment on this proposal. 

Subsequent reporting requirements 

related to the NPRM are not likely, and 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS