alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007117EN.01001901.xml

| 26.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/19

---

Action brought on 29 March 2007 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union

(Case C-167/07)

(2007/C 117/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 (1) of 21 December 2006 fixing for 2007 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required, to the extent that specific quotas are not allocated to the Spanish fleet in the Community waters of the North Sea and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 (1) of 21 December 2006 fixing for 2007 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required, to the extent that specific quotas are not allocated to the Spanish fleet in the Community waters of the North Sea and

1

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

(1)   Infringement of the principle of non-discrimination:

The Kingdom of Spain believes that, to the extent that the contested regulation does not allocate to Spain quotas in the Community waters of the North Sea, there is an infringement of the principle of non-discrimination, given that, on the expiry of the transitional period stipulated in the Act of Accession, all other Member States are recognised to have the right of access to those waters and their resources, whereas the Kingdom of Spain is recognised to have the right of access only to those waters.

(2)   Misinterpretation of the Act of Accession of Spain:

The Act of Accession in laying down rules concerning the transitional period for Spain in relation to fisheries does not distinguish between access to waters and access to resources. Moreover, the provisions of the Act of Accession should be interpreted to accord with its context and purposes.

(3)   Infringement of Article 20(2) of Regulation 2371/2002 (2):

2

The provision is infringed in that no quotas are allocated to Spain in respect of new fishing opportunities established and distributed for the first time after the expiry of the transitional period specified in the Act of Accession.

---

(1)  OJ 2007 L 15, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (OJ 2002 L 358, p. 59).

2

---
### §2773. Rations or commutation therefor in money

(a) Enlisted members of the Coast Guard, civilian officers and civilian crews of vessels, and working parties in the field shall be allowed a ration or commutation thereof in money, in such amount and under limitations and regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

(b) Money for commuted rations shall be paid, under such regulations as the Secretary shall prescribe, on proper vouchers, or pay rolls, to individuals entitled to receive it, or to the officers designated by the Commandant to administer the financial affairs of the messes in which such individuals may be subsisted.

(c) Money paid for commuted rations to the designated officer may be deposited in general or limited depositories of public money or in any bank in which deposits are insured. Such funds shall be expended and accounted for under such regulations as the Secretary shall prescribe.

(d) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed as modifying or changing in any manner the provisions of law pertaining to subsistence allowances for enlisted members, but no ration or commutation thereof shall be allowed an individual receiving a subsistence allowance.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 532, §478; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(B), (C), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; renumbered §2773, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(42), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4750.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§134, 135 (Mar. 25, 1940, ch. 71, title I, 54 Stat. 64; June 6, 1940, ch. 257, §10, 54 Stat. 248; May 31, 1941, ch. 156, title I, §1, 55 Stat. 221; Feb. 7, 1942, ch. 46, title I, 56 Stat. 71; June 26, 1943, ch. 147, §1, 57 Stat. 211; June 22, 1944, ch. 269, §1, 58 Stat. 316; May 29, 1945, ch. 130, §1, 59 Stat. 216; July 12, 1946, ch. 569, §1, 60 Stat. 531; Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 756, §31, 60 Stat. 857; July 1, 1947, ch. 186, title I, §101, 61 Stat. 226).

The provisions of said section 134 are extended to include all persons who might be entitled to receive money for commuted rations, rather than only the officer in charge of the mess.

The last proviso of said section 135 is eliminated, because experience during the past 2 years shows that it may react detrimentally on enlisted men in time of rising food costs.

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283, §8505(a)(42)(A), substituted "individuals" for "persons" in two places.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 116–283, §8505(a)(42)(B), substituted "an individual" for "a person".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 478 of this title as this section.

1984—Subsecs. (a), (d). Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to enlisted members for reference to enlisted men.
# C_2007096EN.01004201.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/42

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 25 April 2007 — Kerstens v Commission of the European Communities

(Case F-59/06) (1)

1

(Career development report - 2004 appraisal procedure - Infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Infringement of the GIP of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations)

(2007/C 96/87)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Herrmann and M. Velardo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment, first, of the decision of the Appointing Authority of 11 July 2005 adopting the applicant's CDE for 2004 and, second, of the express decision of the Appointing Authority of 6 February 2006 dismissing the applicant's complaint No R/769/05.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006, p. 34.

1

---
Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program (SFHGLP) 

Contacts and Resources 

TOPIC CONTACT 

File-Specific Questions 

Information to include in email: Production Team One: SFHGLPONE@usda.gov 

• Identify the state the application is AK, AL, AZ, CA, CO, GU, HI, IA, ID, KS, MT, NM, NV, OR, 

located; if applicable; SD, TX, UT, WA, WI, WP, WY 

• Provide applicant’s name and USDA Production Team Two: SFHGLPTWO@usda.gov 

borrower ID, if applicable; AR, KY, LA, MN, MO, MS, ND, NE, NJ, NY, OK 

• GUS loan number, if applicable Production Team Three: SFHGLPTHREE@usda.gov 

• Include contact information; and CT, DE, GA, IL, MA, MD, ME, MI, NC, NH, RI, SC, VT, 

• Indicate if you would like a call back WV 

(otherwise you will receive an email Production Team Four: SFHGLPFOUR@usda.gov 

reply) FL, IN, OH, PA, PR, TN, VA, VI 

File-Specific Questions by phone: *833-314-0168, ext. 2 

Lender Self-Report sfhgld.qualityassurance@usda.gov 

Program Training sfhgld.lenderpartner@usda.gov Program Marketing and Outreach 

General Loan Scenario Questions sfhgld.program@usda.gov or *833-314-0168, ext. 4 Loan Policy/Regulation/Handbook 

Turn Times *833-314-0168, ext. 1 

Lender Approval/Recertification sfhglpservicing@usda.gov Loan Servicing 

Technical Issues: GUS RD.HD@USDA.GOV or (800) 457-3642 option 2, option 2 

Technical Issues: e-Authentication 

E-Authentication FAQs: 

https://www.eauth.usda.gov/eauth/b/usda/faq 

E-Authentication Contact Us: 

https://www.eauth.usda.gov/eauth/b/usda/contactus 

Loss Claims guarantee.svc@usda.gov 

Monthly and Quarterly Status Reporting RD.SO.HSB@usda.gov GUS User Agreements 

Adding/Removing Security Administrator 

(SFH Guaranteed Loan Program 

Automated Systems) 

Form Instructions: https://www.rd.usda.gov/files/RD-SFHAdditionalLenderSecurity.pdf 

*Phone System Availability: 9:00 am to 3:30 pm ET 

TOOLS AND RESOURCES 

Regulation and Handbook: https://www.rd.usda.gov/resources/directives 

Lender Webpage: Turn times, contact information, and helpful links: https://www.rd.usda.gov/page/sfh-guaranteedlender 

USDA LINC: Training modules, user guides, and more useful resources: https://www.rd.usda.gov/programsservices/lenders/usda-linc-training-resource-library 

GovDelivery: Receive notifications regarding origination, servicing, and GUS updates: 

https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDARD/subscriber/new 

Revised 03.25.2024
CONFORMED COPY  Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code)  Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Millicom International Cellular, S.A., a company incorporated under
the laws of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (the Company),
hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.  Date: April 3rd,
  2008
  By:
  /s/David SachName:  David SachTitle:   
  Chief Financial Officer
sourceTypeID roadTypeID roadTypeVMTFraction

11 1 0.000000

11 2 0.023976

11 3 0.066933

11 4 0.429571

11 5 0.479520

21 1 0.000000

21 2 0.023976

21 3 0.066933

21 4 0.429571

21 5 0.479520

31 1 0.000000

31 2 0.023976

31 3 0.066933

31 4 0.429571

31 5 0.479520

32 1 0.000000

32 2 0.023976

32 3 0.066933

32 4 0.429571

32 5 0.479520

41 1 0.000000

41 2 0.023976

41 3 0.066933

41 4 0.429571

41 5 0.479520

42 1 0.000000

42 2 0.023976

42 3 0.066933

42 4 0.429571

42 5 0.479520

43 1 0.000000

43 2 0.023976

43 3 0.066933

43 4 0.429571

43 5 0.479520

51 1 0.000000

51 2 0.023976

51 3 0.066933

51 4 0.429571

51 5 0.479520

52 1 0.000000

52 2 0.023976

52 3 0.066933

52 4 0.429571

52 5 0.479520

53 1 0.000000

53 2 0.023976

53 3 0.066933

53 4 0.429571

53 5 0.479520

54 1 0.000000
54

2 0.023976

543 0.066933

544 0.429571

545 0.479520

611 0.000000

612 0.023976

613 0.066933

614 0.429571

615 0.479520

621 0.000000

622 0.023976

623 0.066933

624 0.429571

625 0.479520
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,074,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 987,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        665,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           252
<OTHER-SE>                                     261,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,008,167
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,721
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,383<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,112)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,112)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
<FN>
<F1>Includes depreciation and amortization of $24,313, $1,055 allocated to minority
interests, $9,440 in G&A costs and $21,685 related to writedown of asset held
for sale.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2010301EN.01001201.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischen Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 23 August 2010 — Wolfgang Hofmann v Freistaat Bayern

(Case C-419/10)

()

2010/C 301/16

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Wolfgang Hofmann

Applicant:

Defendant: Freistaat Bayern

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Article 2(1) and Article 11(4), second sentence, of Directive 2006/126/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a Member State must refuse to recognise the validity of a driving licence issued by another Member State to a person outside a period during which that person was prohibited from applying for a new licence, in the case where that person’s driving licence had been withdrawn in the national territory of the first Member State and that person’s normal place of residence at the time of the issue of the driving licence was in the national territory of the issuing Member State?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 403, p. 18.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              4,493
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      52,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       155,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  500,532
<PP&E>                                             23,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    528,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             302,169
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        50,000
<COMMON>                                        4,073,257
<OTHER-SE>                                        171,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      528,377
<SALES>                                                58
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   11,299
<CGS>                                               1,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  254,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (247,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (247,740)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (247,740)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.06)



</TABLE>
### [§9774. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–214, §7(1), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 173]

Section, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 590; Aug. 30, 1957, Pub. L. 85–241, title IV, §404(c), 71 Stat. 556; Aug. 10, 1959, Pub. L. 86–149, title IV, §410(c), 73 Stat. 322; July 27, 1962, Pub. L. 87–554, title V, §504(a), (c), 76 Stat. 239; Nov. 7, 1963, Pub. L. 88–174, title V, §503, 77 Stat. 325; Dec. 5, 1969, Pub. L. 91–142, title V, §510(b), 83 Stat. 312; Oct. 27, 1971, Pub. L. 92–145, title V, §508(a), (c), 85 Stat. 408; Nov. 29, 1973, Pub. L. 93–166, title V, §509(e), 87 Stat. 678, related to limitations on construction.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, and applicable to military construction projects, and to construction and acquisition of military family housing authorized before, on, or after such date, see section 12(a) of Pub. L. 97–214, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2801 of this title.
#### Maurice Dwyer *v.*James Duquid *et al.*

1. *Sale—time of payment.*In a sale of property, where nothing is said as to when payment shall be made, the law implies that it shall be made on delivery.

2. *Action—to recover price of goods on partial delivery.*Where personal property is sold and delivered, there being no time fixed for payment, and the purchaser refuses to pay for the same on demand, he will be in default, and the vendor, having complied with his part of the contract, may treat the contract as abandoned, and recover in assumpsit, under the common counts, for the price of the property delivered, according to the contract.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas H. Tipton, Judge, presiding.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by James Duquid and James Crichton against Maurice Dwyer, for the price of ■coal sold and delivered under the following special contract:

“Chicago, *July*9, 1872.

*Terms of contract between Mr. Dwyer and Duquid*& *Oriehton:*

We will commence to deliver to Mr. Dwyer, Lackawana coal at $7.50 per ton, in yard, and if coal advances, Mr. Dwyer to have one-half the advance, and we the other half, with the promise that Mr. Dwyer fills all orders before any or each advance, at the figures paid before the advance; also to supply Mr. Dwyer with all the coal he desires, to supply his trade, until May 1st, 1873.

Duquid & Crichton.”

The case was tried by the court without a jury. The amount of coal delivered' was not disputed, but the defense was, that the plaintiffs had violated their agreement by not delivering the defendant more coal, for which damages were claimed. The court below found for the plaintiffs, for $424.86, which was $283 less than the sum claimed.

*308Mr. T. A. Moran, for the appellant.

Messrs. Nicholes, McKindley & Morrison, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court :

By the terms of the contract between the parties in this case, nothing was said about the time when payment was to be made. In such cases, the law implies that payment is to be made on delivery of the property. *Smith*v. Gillett, 50 Ill. 290; *Metz*v. *Albrecht,*52 id. 492. If, therefore, appellant refused to pay for the coal after delivery, and when payment was demanded by appellees, he was in default, and if appellees, prior to appellant’s default, had complied with their part of the contract, they were authorized to treat the contract as abandoned, and might recover in assumpsit, on the common counts, for the amount of coal they had delivered, according to the contract price. *Evans*v. *Chicago and Rock Island Railroad Company,*26 Ill. 189.

The principal controversy turns on the preponderance of evidence, and, as is quite frequent in such cases, each party asserts, with great apparent confidence, that the preponderance is with him. After carefully examining the evidence in the record, we are not disposed to disturb the finding of the court below. The evidence is conflicting, and so nearly balanced that we do not think the ends of justice require that we should remand the case for a new trial.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### § 162.1 Scope and applicability of rules of practice.

The Uniform Rules of Practice for the Department of Agriculture promulgated in subpart H of part 1, subtitle A, title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, are the Rules of Practice applicable to adjudicatory, administrative proceedings for the revocation or suspension of accreditation of veterinarians (9 CFR parts 160 and 161). In addition, the Supplemental Rules of Practice set forth in subpart B of this part shall be applicable to such proceedings.
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# PD-35R: New Jersey regulations on transportation of regulated medical waste