alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3306. State liaison

To encourage the application of uniform examination principles and standards by State and Federal supervisory agencies, the Council shall establish a liaison committee composed of five representatives of State agencies which supervise financial institutions which shall meet at least twice a year with the Council. Members of the liaison committee shall receive a reasonable allowance for necessary expenses incurred in attending meetings. Members of the Liaison Committee shall elect a chairperson from among the members serving on the committee.

(Pub. L. 95–630, title X, §1007, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3696; Pub. L. 109–351, title VII, §714(b), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1995.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–351 inserted at end "Members of the Liaison Committee shall elect a chairperson from among the members serving on the committee."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of 120 days after Nov. 10, 1978, see section 2101 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 375b of this title.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 21-2423

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Taylor Grant

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________ 

Submitted: April 1, 2022

Filed: April 6, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________ 

PER CURIAM.

 

Taylor Grant appeals after a jury convicted him of assault resulting in serious 

bodily injury in Indian country, and the district court1 imposed a Guidelines-range 

sentence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

1

The Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District 

Court for the District of Nebraska.
-2- 

On appeal, Grant argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove he was 

responsible for the victim’s injuries, and challenges the sentence as substantively 

unreasonable. This court finds no basis for reversal. The evidence at trial—

including the victim’s direct testimony that she recalled Grant hitting her in the head 

on two separate occasions during the period in question, and other circumstantial 

evidence to support the inference that Grant was the assailant—was sufficient to 

support Grant’s convictions. See United States v. Littlewind, 595 F.3d 876, 881-82, 

884 (8th Cir. 2010) (jury verdict must be upheld “if any rational interpretation of the 

evidence, regardless of countervailing evidence, would allow a reasonable-minded 

jury to conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt”; this court may not weigh the 

evidence or assess credibility of witnesses, rather, it must presume that triers of fact 

resolved any conflict in government’s favor); United States v. Erdman, 953 F.2d 

387, 389 (8th Cir. 1992) (conviction may be based on circumstantial as well as direct 

evidence). 

The sentence was not substantively unreasonable, as the record shows the 

district court considered the record, the parties’ sentencing memoranda and oral 

arguments, and Grant’s motion for a variance; and discussed some of the 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62, 464 (8th 

Cir. 2009) (en banc) (substantive reasonableness of sentence is reviewed for abuse 

of discretion; abuse of discretion occurs when court fails to consider relevant factor, 

gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of 

judgment in weighing appropriate factor); see also United States v. Gray, 533 F.3d 

942, 944-46 (8th Cir. 2008) (if district court references some § 3553(a) factors, this 

court is ordinarily satisfied it was aware of them all); cf. United States v. St. Claire, 

831 F.3d 1039, 1043 (8th Cir. 2016) (within-Guidelines sentence is accorded 

presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. 

______________________________
§ 146.12 Debarment from participation. Participants in the Plan who, after investigation by the Official State Agency or its representative, are notified in writing of their apparent noncompliance with the Plan provisions or regulations of the Official State Agency shall be afforded a reasonable time, as specified by the Official State Agency, within which to demonstrate or achieve compliance. If compliance is not demonstrated or achieved within the specified time, the Official State Agency may debar the participant from further participation in the Plan for such period, or indefinitely, as the Official State Agency may deem appropriate. The debarred participant shall be afforded notice of the bases for the debarment and opportunity to present his or her views with respect to the debarment in accordance with procedures adopted by the Official State Agency. The Official State Agency shall thereupon decide whether the debarment order shall continue in effect. Such decision shall be final unless the debarred participant, within 30 days after the issuance of the debarment order, requests the Administrator to determine the eligibility of the debarred participant for participation in the Plan. In such an event, the Administrator shall determine the matter de novo in accordance with the rules of practice in 7 CFR part 50, which are hereby made applicable to proceedings before the Administrator under this section. The definitions in 7 CFR 50.10 and the following definitions shall apply with respect to terms used in such rules of practice: ( a ) *Administrator* means the Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or any officer or employee to whom authority has heretofore been delegated or to who authority may hereafter be delegated to act in his or her stead.
( b ) [Reserved]
### §4406. Relationship to other payments systems

This chapter shall have no effect by implication or otherwise on the validity or legal enforceability of a netting arrangement of any payment system which is not subject to this chapter.

(Pub. L. 102–242, title IV, §406, Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2375.)
# C_2006237EN.01001401.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/14

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 July 2006 — AITEC and Others v Commission

(Case T -371/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 237/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Clarus Corporation

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements on
Form  S-8  (Registration  Nos.  333-42600,   333-42602,   333-42604,  333-42606,
333-59193,   333-71838  and  333-127686)  and  on  Form  S-3  (Registration  No.
333-90077)  of Clarus  Corporation  of our  reports  dated  March 7, 2006,  with
respect  to  the   consolidated   balance  sheets  of  Clarus   Corporation  and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 2005 and 2004,  and the related  consolidated
statements of operations,  stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash
flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December 31, 2005,
and the related financial  statement  schedule,  management's  assessment of the
effectiveness  of internal  control over financial  reporting as of December 31,
2005 and the  effectiveness of internal  control over financial  reporting as of
December 31, 2005,  which reports  appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report
on Form 10-K of Clarus Corporation.

                             /s/ KPMG LLP
                             ---------------------------
                             Stamford, Connecticut
                             March 7, 2006
# C_2007035EN.01005001.xml

| 17.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/50

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4191 — Etat Français-Thalès/DCN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 35/07)

| 1. | On 12 February 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Thalès SA (‘Thalès’, France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control with the French Republic of the undertaking DCN SA (‘DCN’, France) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 12 February 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Thalès SA (‘Thalès’, France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control with the French Republic of the undertaking DCN SA (‘DCN’, France) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Thalès: critical information systems for defense, aerospace, transport and civil security applications; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Thalès: critical information systems for defense, aerospace, transport and civil security applications;

| — | for DCN: naval defense. |
| --- | --- |

—

for DCN: naval defense.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4191 — Etat Français-Thalès/DCN, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4191 — Etat Français-Thalès/DCN, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Missouri Rural Development State Office**601 Business Loop 70 WestParkade Center, Suite 235Columbia, MO 65203Phone: (573) 876-0976

**Questions about Multifamily Housing Programs?** Call 1-800-292-8293

For general inquiries, please email RDMissouri@usda.gov.

To locate your nearest office, please refer to the map of USDA Rural Development Missouri offices.  This map includes contact information for staff in local offices.

                          -    - State DirectorKyle Wilkens (View Bio)
 
                          -                      View All State Contacts                   
                          -                        Follow the RD Missouri Office on X                     
                          -                        Receive Emails Through GovDelivery                     

## Highlights and Announcements

                                -    PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of Changes to Eligible Area Maps for USDA Rural Devel... 
                                -    PUBLIC NOTICE: 30 Day Public Inspection Period and Comments Received from U... 
                                -    Notice Of Potential Changes to Eligible Area Maps for USDA Rural Developmen... 
                                -    Broadband Resources Guide for Rural America 

### Featured Programs

                          -  Single Family Housing Direct Home Loans 
                          -  Single Family Housing Repair Loans & Grants 
                          -  Meat and Poultry Intermediary Lending Program 
                          -  Community Facilities Direct Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Water & Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Business & Industry Loan Guarantees 
View All State Programs

### Resources

**Check Eligibility**Check a home, town or service location to verify eligibility for Rural Programs

**Manage your USDA Loan**You can create an account and manage your current loan through the Customer Service Center (CSC) portal. You can also contact the CSC at 800-414-1226
View All Resources

## Rural Development News

                                -  Celebrate Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s Legacy | State Director NewsletterJan 18, 2024 
                                -  USDA Officials Visit Rural Missouri to Celebrate Groundbreaking of Historical Event to Expand High-Speed InternetAug 31, 2023 
                                -  USDA Announces More Than $70 Million to Strengthen Rural Infrastructure and Create JobsAug 29, 2023 
                                -  USDA Helps Expand Access to Rural Health Care in MissouriJul 25, 2023 
                                -  USDA Announces Historical Funding in Support of Lowering Energy Costs for Rural Business Owners and Agricultural ProducersJul 13, 2023 
                                -  USDA Officials Visit Portageville, Missouri to Celebrate Critical Public Safety EquipmentJul 10, 2023 

View All State News
#### § 81.30 What information is contained in the Registered Voters List?

The Registered Voters List must contain the names, in alphabetical order, of all registered voters and their voting districts, if voting districts are required by the tribe's governing document's amendment or adoption articles.
### The 1973 Mississippi River basin flood; compilation and analyses of meteorologic, streamflow, and sediment data

By: Edwin H. ChinJohn SkeltonHarold P. Guy

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp937

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K (the "Report") of
Glimcher Realty Trust (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, I,
Melinda A. Janik, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: March 12, 2004                        /s/ Melinda A. Janik
      -------------------                   ------------------------------
                                            Melinda A. Janik
                                            Senior Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Glimcher Realty
Trust and will be retained by Glimcher Realty Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 9038.4 Extensions of time. ( a ) It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time under 11 CFR part 9038 shall not be routinely granted.
( b ) Whenever a candidate has a right or is required to take action within a period of time prescribed by 11 CFR part 9038 or by notice given thereunder, the candidate may apply in writing to the Commission for an extension of time in which to exercise such right or take such action. The candidate shall demonstrate in the application for extension that good cause exists for his or her request.
( c ) An application for extension of time shall be made at least 7 calendar days prior to the expiration of the time period for which the extension is sought. The Commission may, upon a showing of good cause, grant an extension of time to a candidate who has applied for such extension in a timely manner. The length of time of any extension granted hereunder will be decided by the Commission and may be less than the amount of time sought by the candidate in his or her application. If a candidate seeks an extension of any 60-day response period under 11 CFR part 9038, the Commission may grant no more than one extension to that candidate, which extension shall not exceed 15 days.
( d ) If a candidate fails to seek an extension of time, exercise a right or take a required action prior to the expiration of a time period prescribed by 11 CFR part 9038 the Commission may, on the candidate's showing of excusable neglect: ( 1 ) Permit such candidate to exercise his or her right(s), or take such required action(s) after the expiration of the prescribed time period; and
( 2 ) Take into consideration any information obtained in connection with the exercise of any such right or taking of any such action before making decisions or determinations under 11 CFR part 9038.
[56 FR 35945, July 29, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 31887, June 16, 1995]
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  Publications             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeCareersPolice OfficerSpecial Units

K-9 Sniff

Gun Training

ERT Training

CRD Training

CD Training

Recruit Fair

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# C_2006331EN.01002302.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/23

---

Order of the Court of 7 November 2006 — Centro Provincial de Jóvenes Agricultores de Jaén (ASAJA), Salvador Contreras Gila, José Ramiro López, Antonio Ramiro López, Cristobal Gallego Martínez, Benito García Burgos, Antonio Parras Rosa v Council of the European Union

(Case C-418/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 - Action for annulment - Support scheme in the olive oil sector - Natural and legal persons - Not individually concerned)

(2006/C 331/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Centro Provincial de Jóvenes Agricultores de Jaén (ASAJA), Salvador Contreras Gila, José Ramiro López, Antonio Ramiro López, Cristobal Gallego Martínez, Benito García Burgos, Antonio Parras Rosa (represented by: J. Vázquez Medina, abogado)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Balta and M.F. Florindo Gijón, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Nolin and F. Jimeno Fernández, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 8 September 2005 in Joined Cases T-295/04 to T-297/04 ASAJA and Others v Council, declaring inadmissible the actions for partial annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 of 29 April 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, and adapting it by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union (OJ 2004 L 161, p. 48)

ASAJA and Others

Council

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | The applicants are ordered to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants are ordered to pay the costs;

| 3. | The Commission of the European Communities shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission of the European Communities shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.

1

---