12322 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2011 / Notices 

11A party named or added to temporary denial 

order as a related person may appeal its inclusion 

as a related person, but not the underlying basis for 

the issuance of the TDO. See Section 766.23(c). 

that the item will be, or is intended to 

be, exported from the United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by a Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by a Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been or will 

be exported from the United States. For 

purposes of this paragraph, servicing 

means installation, maintenance, repair, 

modification or testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to a Denied Person 

by affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 

made subject to the provisions of this 

Order. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the EAR where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the EAR are the foreign-produced direct 

product of U.S.-origin technology. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

Sections 766.24(e) and 766.23(c)(2) of 

the EAR, Mahan Airways, Gatewick 

LLC, Mahmoud Amini and/or Kosarian 

Fard may, at any time, appeal this Order 

by filing a full written statement in 

support of the appeal with the Office of 

the Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 

South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 

21202–4022.11

In accordance with the provisions of 

Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may 

seek renewal of this Order by filing a 

written request not later than 20 days 

before the expiration date. A renewal 

request may be opposed by Mahan 

Airways as provided in Section 

766.24(d), by filing a written submission 

with the Assistant Secretary of 

Commerce for Export Enforcement, 

which must be received not later than 

seven days before the expiration date of 

the Order. 

A copy of this Order shall be provided 

to Mahan Airways and each related 

person and shall be published in the 

Federal Register. This Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

for 180 days. 

Dated: February 25, 2011. 

David W. Mills, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5114 Filed 3–4–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–817, A–560–805, A–475–826, A–588– 

847, A–580–836] 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate From India, Indonesia, Italy, 

Japan, and the Republic of Korea; 

Final Results of the Expedited Second 

Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping 

Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 1, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated the second sunset 

reviews of the antidumping duty orders 

on certain cut-to-length carbon-quality 

steel plate (CTL Plate) from India, 

Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and the Republic 

of Korea, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). The Department has conducted 

expedited (120-day) sunset reviews for 

these orders pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of 

these sunset reviews, the Department 

finds that revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger or Gemal Brangman, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4136 and (202) 

482–3773, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 1, 2010, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of the 

second sunset reviews of the 

antidumping duty orders on CTL Plate 

from India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and 

the Republic of Korea, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation 

of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 

74685 (December 1, 2010). 

The Department received notices of 

intent to participate from the following 

domestic parties within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i): 

ArcelorMittal Steel USA Inc., Evraz 

Claymont Steel, Evraz Oregon Steel 

Mills, Nucor Corporation, and SSAB 

N.A.D (collectively ‘‘the domestic 

interested parties’’). These parties 

claimed interested party status under 

section 771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b), as domestic manufacturers 

and producers of the domestic like 

product. 

The Department received complete 

(collective) substantive responses to the 

notice of initiation from the domestic 

interested parties within the 30-day 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no 

substantive responses from respondent 

interested parties with respect to any of 

the orders covered by these sunset 

reviews. As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department 

conducted expedited (120-day) sunset 

reviews of the antidumping duty orders 

on CTL Plate from India, Indonesia, 

Italy, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. 

Scope of the Orders 

The products covered under the CTL 

Plate antidumping duty orders are 

certain hot-rolled carbon-quality steel: 

(1) Universal mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled 

products rolled on four faces or in a 

closed box pass, of a width exceeding 

150 mm but not exceeding 1250 mm, 

and of a nominal or actual thickness of 

not less than 4 mm, which are cut-tolength (not in coils) and without 

patterns in relief), of iron or non-alloyquality steel; and (2) flat-rolled 

products, hot-rolled, of a nominal or 

actual thickness of 4.75 mm or more and 

of a width which exceeds 150 mm and 

measures at least twice the thickness, 

and which are cut-to-length (not in 

coils). Steel products to be included in 

the scope of the orders are of 

rectangular, square, circular or other 

shape and of rectangular or nonrectangular cross-section where such 

non-rectangular cross-section is 

achieved subsequent to the rolling 

process (i.e., products which have been 

‘‘worked after rolling’’)—for example, 

products which have been beveled or 

rounded at the edges. Steel products 

that meet the noted physical 

characteristics that are painted, 

varnished or coated with plastic or other 

non-metallic substances are included 

within the scope. Also, specifically 

included in the scope of the orders are 

high strength, low alloy (HSLA) steels. 

HSLA steels are recognized as steels 

with micro-alloying levels of elements 

such as chromium, copper, niobium, 

titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum. 

Steel products to be included in the 

scope, regardless of Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

definitions, are products in which: (1) 

Iron predominates, by weight, over each 

of the other contained elements, (2) the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2011 / Notices 12323 

carbon content is two percent or less, by 

weight, and (3) none of the elements 

listed below is equal to or exceeds the 

quantity, by weight, respectively 

indicated: 1.80 percent of manganese, or 

1.50 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent 

of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum, 

or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 

percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of 

lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30 

percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of 

molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of 

niobium, or 0.41 percent of titanium, or 

0.15 percent of vanadium, or 0.15 

percent zirconium. All products that 

meet the written physical description, 

and in which the chemistry quantities 

do not equal or exceed any one of the 

levels listed above, are within the scope 

of the orders unless otherwise 

specifically excluded. The following 

products are specifically excluded from 

the orders: (1) Products clad, plated, or 

coated with metal, whether or not 

painted, varnished or coated with 

plastic or other non-metallic substances; 

(2) SAE grades (formerly AISI grades) of 

series 2300 and above; (3) products 

made to ASTM A710 and A736 or their 

proprietary equivalents; (4) abrasionresistant steels (i.e., USS AR 400, USS 

AR 500); (5) products made to ASTM 

A202, A225, A514 grade S, A517 grade 

S, or their proprietary equivalents; (6) 

ball bearing steels; (7) tool steels; and (8) 

silicon manganese steel or silicon 

electric steel. 

Regarding the scope of the order for 

Japan, the following additional 

exclusions apply with respect to 

abrasion-resistant steels: NK–EH–360 

(NK Everhard 360) and NK–EH–500 (NK 

Everhard 500). NK–EH–360 has the 

following specifications: (a) Physical 

Properties: Thickness ranging from 6–50 

mm, Brinell Hardness: 361 min.; (b) 

Heat Treatment: controlled heat 

treatment; and (c) Chemical 

Composition (percent weight): C: 0.20 

max., Si: 0.55 max., Mn: 1.60 max., P: 

0.030 max., S: 0.030 max., Cr: 0.40 max., 

Ti: 0.005–0.020, B: 0.004 max. NK–EH– 

500 has the following specifications: (a) 

Physical Properties: Thickness ranging 

from 6–50 mm, Brinell Hardness: 477 

min.; (b) Heat Treatment: Controlled 

heat treatment; and (c) Chemical 

Composition (percent weight): C: 0.35 

max., Si: 0.55 max., Mn: 1.60 max., P: 

0.030 max., S: 0.030 max., Cr: 0.80 max., 

Ti: 0.005–0.020, B: 0.004 max. 

The merchandise subject to the orders 

is currently classifiable in the HTSUS 

under subheadings: 7208.40.3030, 

7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 

7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 

7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 

7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 

7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, 

7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 

7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 

7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 

7225.40.3050, 7225.40.7000, 

7225.50.6000, 7225.99.0090, 

7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, 

7226.91.8000, 7226.99.0000. Although 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the written description of the 

merchandise covered by the orders is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in these reviews are 

addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset 

Reviews of the Antidumping Duty 

Orders on Certain Cut-To-Length 

Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from India, 

Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and the Republic 

of Korea’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration 

(Decision Memo), which is hereby 

adopted by, and issued concurrently 

with, this notice. The issues discussed 

in the Decision Memo include the 

likelihood of continuation or recurrence 

of dumping and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the orders 

were revoked. Parties can find a 

complete discussion of all issues raised 

in these reviews and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum which is on file in the 

Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 

main Department building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. 

The paper copy and electronic version 

of the Decision Memo are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Reviews 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on CTL Plate 

from India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and 

the Republic of Korea would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the rates listed below: 

Exporter/manufacturer Margin 

percentage 

India: 

Steel Authority of India, Ltd .. 42.39 

All Others .............................. 42.39 

Indonesia: 

PT Gunawan Dianjaya/PT 

Jaya Pari Steel Corporation ..................................... 50.80 

PT Krakatau Steel ................. 52.42 

All Others .............................. 50.80 

Italy: 

Palini and Bertoli S.p.A ......... 7.64 

All Others .............................. 7.64 

Japan: 

Exporter/manufacturer Margin 

percentage 

Kawasaki Steel Corporation 9.46 

Kobe Steel, Ltd ..................... 59.12 

Nippon Steel Corporation ..... 59.12 

NKK Corporation ................... 59.12 

Sumitomo Metal Industries, 

Ltd ...................................... 59.12 

All Others .............................. 9.46 

Republic of Korea: 

Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd .. 2.98 

All Others .............................. 2.98 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective orders 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: March 1, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5125 Filed 3–4–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–827] 

Certain Cased Pencils From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Expedited Third Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 7, 2011. 

SUMMARY: On November 1, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register the notice of initiation of the 

third sunset review of the antidumping 

duty order on certain cased pencils 

(‘‘pencils’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’), pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’). See Initiation of 

Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 

67082 (November 1, 2010). The 

Department has conducted an expedited 

sunset review of this order pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES