alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: May 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 94)]
[Notices]
[Page 27555-27556]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17my10-62]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0009]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection;
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Application for Issuing Bank Credit Limit (IBCL) Under
Bank Letter of Credit Policy.
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The Application for Issuing Bank Credit Limit (IBCL) Under Bank
Letter of Credit Policy will be used by entities involved in the export
of US goods and services.
    We have made the following changes to this application:
    a. Added the following questions:
    1. How many new FTEs in the U.S. do you export to hire this year to
help obtain and fulfill your export sales covered by this letter of
credit?
    2. How many existing FTEs in the U.S. do you currently have on
staff to obtain and fulfill your export sales covered by this letter of
credit?

[[Page 27556]]

    These two questions have been added in order to better assess the
impact export financing has on U.S. employment. It is generally
understood that assisting U.S. exports results in improved U.S.
employment; the information from these questions will be used to
quantify the expected benefit from Ex-Im Bank's support.
    Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or
electronically. The information collected will provide information
needed to determine compliance and creditworthiness for transaction
requests submitted to the Export Import Bank under its long term
guarantee and direct loan programs.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before July 16, 2010 to be
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Michele Kuester, Export Import Bank
of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 92-36 Application for Issuing Bank
Credit Limit (IBCL) under Bank Letter of Credit Policy.
    OMB Number: 3048-0016.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information collected will provide information
needed to determine compliance and creditworthiness for transaction
requests submitted to the Export Import Bank under its long term
guarantee and direct loan programs.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-11667 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
##### 



Exhibit
10.38
  
 Re:
    
    Amended and Restated Employment Letter Agreement with Terremark
Worldwide, Inc.
   1. SERVICES TO BE RENDERED AS A TERREMARK EMPLOYEE




---



##### 



2. COMPENSATION
  3. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
 i.
    
    Notwithstanding your title and your status as an employee and a member of the
Board of Directors of the Company, we both agree and understand that you are not an
officer and you will not have any of the responsibilities of an officer or the ability
to bind the Company to any agreement with a third party, or to incur any obligation or
liability on behalf of the Company;ii.
    
    This Letter Agreement may only be modified by a written document duly signed by
you and the Company;iii.
    
    This Letter Agreement shall expire on January 31, 2007 (the Expiration Date);
provided, however, the term shall continue in effect thereafter unless (a) terminated
in writing by the Company or you on 48 hours written notice for cause (which is
intended to be narrowly defined to consist only of a material breach of this agreement
or conduct by one party that is so embarrassing or egregious as to render the
relationship damaging to the non-offending party), or (b) terminated in writing by the
Company or you, without cause, on ninety (90) days notice;iv.
    
    The Company and you will consult and agree upon the form, terms and substance
of all press releases, public announcements and publicity statements with respect to
this Letter Agreement;v.
    
    In the event of your death prior to receiving any or all payments to which you
are entitled, the remaining Compensation to be paid under the terms hereof shall be
paid at the time and in the manner provided in Section 2 to the beneficiary or
beneficiaries who you have designated on a beneficiary designation form properly filed
by you with the Company in accordance with the Companys policies and procedures. If no
such designated beneficiary survives you, such remaining benefits shall be paid as set
forth above to your estate.vi.
    
    This Letter Agreement, when countersigned by the Company, will constitute a
binding agreement between you and the Company, and shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Florida.




---



##### 



Terremark Worldwide, Inc.By:
    /s/ Manuel D. MedinaName:
    Manuel D. MedinaTitle:
    Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer 
 /s/ Arthur L. MoneyArthur L. Money
# C_2006175EN.01000101.xml

| 27.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 July 2006

(2006/C 175/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2587 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4610 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68415 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2452 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5756 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,54 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9340 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,373 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,81 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9246 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5455 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,122 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9138 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6599 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4323 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7899 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0171 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9923 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 201,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,8301 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0541 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2650 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 454,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,632 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,138 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9450 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,793 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2587

JPY

Japanese yen

147,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4610

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68415

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2452

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5756

ISK

Iceland króna

91,54

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9340

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,373

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,81

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9246

RON

Romanian leu

3,5455

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,122

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9138

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6599

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4323

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7899

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0171

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9923

KRW

South Korean won

1 201,49

ZAR

South African rand

8,8301

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0541

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2650

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 454,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,632

PHP

Philippine peso

65,138

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9450

THB

Thai baht

47,793

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
AFFIRM; Opinion issued January 14, 2013.

In The

Qourt of 1pptat

jfiftlj itrict of texa at a1ta

No, 05-12-00572-CR

MICHELLE PETRICE ABRAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-63009-J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices LangMiers, Myers, and Lewis

Opinion by Justice LangMiers

Michelle Petrice Abram waived a jury, pleaded guilty to theft of property from an elderly

person, and pleaded true to one enhancement paragraph. See TEx, PENAL CoDE ANN. § 31.03(a),

(f)(3)(A) (West Supp. 2012). After finding appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment

at ten years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes

the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.

CaliJrnia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record

showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d
807. 811 (Tex. Crini. App. I Panel Op. l978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant.

We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See IIkdsne i Slate. 178 S.W.3d 824.

827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2(X)5) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anclers eases). We agree the

appeal is frivolous and without merit We tind nothing in the record that might arguably support

theappeal.

We affirm the trial court’sjudgment

d![%q)yati.

ELIZ,>BEI’H LANd-MIER&

JUSTICE

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. Av. P.47

I 20572F.U05

-2-
/ L•i

I U

Q!ourt of 1ppat

jftft!, ttttrt of Z!texa at a11a

JUDGMENT

MICHELLE PETRICE ABRAM, Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Appellant No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct,No,

Fl l630094).

No. 051 2OO572CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice LangMiers,

Justices Myers and Lewis participating.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFiR\’IED.

Judgment entered January 14. 2013.

H IZABETI I LANG-M IERS

1ST I( ‘E
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1740 V

UNPUBLISHED

JENNIFER WOOD

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: October 26, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria

acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for petitioner.

Debra A. Filteau Begley , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On November 8, 2018

, Jennifer W ood filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoul der injury related to vaccine

administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of a tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis ( “ Tdap ” )

vaccine . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office

of Special Masters.

On October 15, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, R espondent states that “ [P]etitioner ’ s alleged injury is consistent with

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

SIRVA, as d efin ed on the Vaccine Injury Table

. ” Id. at 4 . Respondent further agrees that

Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
### §3733. Suspension of this subchapter in time of war or national emergency

In time of war or national emergency declared by Congress, the President may suspend the operation of this subchapter or any part hereof. If this subchapter or any part hereof is suspended by the President, prior to placing the suspended provision in operation, the President shall by regulation, in so far as practicable, adjust the grades of Reserve officers in the same manner as adjustments in grade are made for Regular officers.

(Added Pub. L. 96–322, §1, Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1007, §722; renumbered §3733, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §118(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 778 of this title prior to the complete revision of former chapter 21 of this title by Pub. L. 96–322.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 722 of this title as this section.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Authority

Authority of President under this section to suspend the operation of this subchapter concerning officers of the Coast Guard Reserve without the approval, ratification, or other action by the President during a time of war or national emergency delegated to Secretary of Homeland Security by Ex. Ord. No. 14106, §2(b), Aug. 14, 2023, 88 F.R. 55905, set out in a note under section 2101 of this title.

Authority of President under this section as invoked by section 2 of Ex. Ord. No. 13223, Sept. 14, 2001, 66 F.R. 48201, as amended, delegated to Secretary of Homeland Security by section 5 of Ex. Ord. No. 13223, set out as a note under section 12302 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
- Contents
      - Front matter
      - Introduction
      - Summary
      - Stigma Defined
      - Stigma and the General Population
      - Stigma and Access to Care
      - Violence
      - Interventions
      - References

			DRAFT

Deborah L. Brimlow, Ph.D., Jennifer S. Cook, and Richard Seaton, editors

Production support provided by Impact Marketing + Communications			Contract #231-01-0052

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services			Health Resources and Services Administration			HIV/AIDS Bureau			Room 7-06			5600 Fishers Lane			Rockville, MD 20857			(301) 443­–1993 

 

TOP
#### In the Matter of the Application of Ernest Martin Quittmeyer for Admission to the Bar.

Application granted. Present — Woodward, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
§ 115.68 Post-allegation protective custody. ( a ) The facility shall take care to place detainee victims of sexual abuse in a supportive environment that represents the least restrictive housing option possible (e.g., protective custody), subject to the requirements of § 115.43.
( b ) Detainee victims shall not be held for longer than five days in any type of administrative segregation, except in highly unusual circumstances or at the request of the detainee.
( c ) A detainee victim who is in protective custody after having been subjected to sexual abuse shall not be returned to the general population until completion of a proper re-assessment, taking into consideration any increased vulnerability of the detainee as a result of the sexual abuse.
( d ) Facilities shall notify the appropriate ICE Field Office Director whenever a detainee victim has been held in administrative segregation for 72 hours.
( e ) Upon receiving notification that a detainee victim has been held in administrative segregation, the ICE Field Office Director shall review the placement and consider: ( 1 ) Whether the placement is only as a last resort and when no other viable housing options exist; and
( 2 ) In cases where the detainee has been held in administrative segregation for longer than 5 days, whether the placement is justified by highly unusual circumstances or at the detainee's request.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ David W.  Montgomery |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | David W. Montgomery      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |
|   |                     |
|   | Date: May  13, 2003      |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

This certification is beingsubmitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose ofcomplying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode. This certification shall not to be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), orotherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification does notconstitute a part of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q accompanyingthis certification and to which it is an exhibit.

 

----
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4297 — Nokia/Siemens)

(2006/C 246/14)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
# C_2007095EN.01003301.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/33

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden lodged on 2 March 2007 — J.C.M. Beheer B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-124/07)

(2007/C 95/62)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: J.C.M. Beheer B.V.

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Question referred

Do the provisions of Article 13 B(a) of the Sixth Directive (1) extend to activities of a (legal) person which performs characteristic and essential activities of an insurance broker and insurance agent, whereby negotiations are carried out in the name of another insurance broker or insurance agent in connection with the bringing about of insurance transactions?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEG of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

1

---
### [§2502. Renumbered §4812]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2502, added Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VIII, §821(b)(1)(B), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2015, related to defense industrial base policies, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–484, §4202(a).

Another prior section 2502 was renumbered section 4864 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, José A. Segrera, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K/A forthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Terremark Worldwide, Inc.     /s/ José A. Segrera           José A. Segrera *Executive Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer* *(Principal Accounting Officer)*Date: February 2, 2006
#### § 17.455 Textbooks and curricular material.

Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted as requiring or prohibiting or abridging in any way the use of particular textbooks or curricular materials.
#### § 13.40 Stays ordered by the Department of Justice.

If at any time the Attorney General or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General transmits to the Authority Head a written finding that continuation of the administrative process described in this part with respect to a Claim or Statement may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action related to such Claim or Statement, the Authority Head will stay the process immediately. The Authority Head may order the process resumed only upon receipt of the written authorization of the Attorney General.
H. Res. 608

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 3, 2000.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Martinez.

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mrs. Wilson.

Attest:

Clerk.
### §163. Authority of other agencies

This subchapter does not revoke or impair the authority of any other Federal agency with respect to the collection or release of information.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1021.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., §251 (Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 910, §1, 64 Stat. 784).

Section was derived from part of subsection (b) of section 251 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed. Subsection (a) of such section 251 is also incorporated in this subchapter, and the remainder of such subsection (b) thereof is incorporated in subchapter I of chapter 1 of this title. See Distribution Table.

Changes were made in phraseology.