alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §86a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–221, title V, §511, Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 164; Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §324(b), (d), Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1648, which authorized interest on business or agricultural loans of $1,000 or more at a rate of not more than 5 per centum in excess of the discount rate, was omitted pursuant to section 512 of Pub. L. 96–221 which made these provisions applicable only with respect to such loans made in any State during the period beginning on April 1, 1980, and ending on the earlier of (1) April 1, 1983, or (2) the date, on or after April 1, 1980, on which such State adopts a law or certifies that the voters of such State have voted in favor of any provision, constitutional or otherwise, which states explicitly that such State does not want these provisions to apply with respect to loans made in such State.

A prior section 86a, Pub. L. 96–161, title II, §205, Dec. 28, 1979, 93 Stat. 1237, similar to this section as enacted by Pub. L. 96–221, was repealed by section 529 of Pub. L. 96–221, effective at the close of Mar. 31, 1980, except that its provisions would continue to apply to any loan made, any deposit made, or any obligation issued in any State during any period when that section was in effect in such State. For the effective date provisions relating to the prior section 86a, see section 207 of Pub. L. 96–161.

Another prior section 86a, Pub. L. 96–104, title I, §105, Nov. 5, 1979, 93 Stat. 791, identical to this section as enacted by Pub. L. 96–161, was repealed by section 212 of Pub. L. 96–161, effective at the close of Dec. 27, 1979, except that its provisions would continue to apply to loans made in any State on or after Nov. 5, 1979, but prior to such repeal.

Section 301 of Pub. L. 96–104, which limited the applicability of Pub. L. 96–104 to those States having a constitutional provision that all contracts for a greater rate of interest than 10 per centum per annum are void as to both principal and interest, was repealed by section 212 of Pub. L. 96–161, effective at the close of Dec. 27, 1979.
# C_2007129EN.01001801.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/18

---

Action brought on 5 April 2007 — Freistaat Sachsen v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-102/07)

(2007/C 129/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Freistaat Sachsen (Germany) (represented by C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2007) 130 final of 24 January 2007 relating to State aid No C 38/2005 (formerly NN 52/2004) from Germany to the Biria Group in so far as it relates to what the decision terms measures 2 and 3, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2007) 130 final of 24 January 2007 relating to State aid No C 38/2005 (formerly NN 52/2004) from Germany to the Biria Group in so far as it relates to what the decision terms measures 2 and 3, and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant challenges Commission Decision C(2007) 130 final of 24 January 2007 in which the Commission held that the three measures comprising State aid from Germany for the benefit of Bike Systems GmbH & Co., Thüringer Zweiradwerk KG, Sachsen Zweirad GmbH and Biria GmbH (now Biria AG) is incompatible with the common market.

The applicant claims that it is directly and individually concerned by the Commission's decision, because measures 2 and 3, which relate to guarantees in favour of Sachsen Zweirad GmbH and Biria GmbH (now Biria AG), were granted by it from its own resources on the basis of the guarantee guidelines of the Freistaat Sachsen.

In support of its claim, the applicant claims, first, that there was an infringement of Community law by reason of an incorrect interpretation of an approved aid measure. In that regard, the applicant claims that the defendant misconstrued the corresponding definition in the approved aid measure so as to treat the undertakings concerned as undertakings in financial difficulties. Since, in the applicant's opinion, that was not the case, measures 2 and 3 relate to approved aid.

In addition, the applicant claims that the defendant wrongly assessed the factual position in proceeding on the basis that the undertakings concerned were undertakings in financial difficulties.

Lastly, the applicant alleges that the contested decision fails to state adequate reasons.

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. B OB B Y R ODR IGUEZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-50545

D.C . No. 3:04-c r-03002-DM S M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia D ana M . Sa

braw, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 15, 2016 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, LEAVY, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. B obby R odrigue z a

ppe a ls from

the nine -m onth se nte nc e im pose d upon his third re v oc ation of supe rvise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED MAR 21 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).R odrigue z c onte nds tha t the distric t c ourt im

pe rm issibly

de le gate d its judic ia l a uthority whe n it re

je c te d his re que st for outpa tie nt drug tre atm e nt a

nd de fe rre d to the probation offic e r’ s re c om m e ndation tha

t R odrigue z e i the r se rve a short se nte nc e followe d by inpa tie nt drug tre atm e nt or a

longe r te rm ina l se nte nc e . The c a se upon whic h R odrigue zre lie s, Unite d State s v . Esparza , 552 F.3d 1088 (9th C ir. 2009), is ina

pposite . Unlike in tha

t c a se , the distric t c ourt he re did not im pose a c ondition of supe

rvise d re le a se gran ting the probation offic e r the a uthority to de c ide whe the r R odrigue z would pa rtic ipate in inpa

tie nt or outpa

tie nt drug tre atm e nt. R athe r, the re c ord shows tha t the c ourt sim

ply liste ne d to the pa rtie s ’ argum e nts, found proba tion’ s re c om

m e ndation a ga inst outpa

tie n t tre atm e nt pe rsua sive , a

nd im pose d a te rm ina l se nte nc e in light of R odrigue z ’ s unwillingne ss to pa rtic ipate in inpa

tie nt tre atm e nt. The distric t c ourt did not err. AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 5 0 5 4 5 2
§ 20.307 What resources does the Bureau consider when determining need? When the Bureau determines General Assistance eligibility and payment levels, we consider income and other resources as specified in §§ 20.308 and 20.309. ( a ) All income, earned or unearned, must be calculated in the month it is received and as a resource thereafter, except that certain income obtained from the sale of real or personal property may be exempt as provided in § 20.309.
( b ) Resources are considered to be available when they are converted to cash.
§ 514.13 How are late submission fees paid, and can interest be assessed? ( a ) Late fees assessed under this part shall be paid by the person or entity assessed and shall not be treated as an operating expense of the operation.
( b ) The Commission shall transfer the late fee paid under this subchapter to the U.S. Treasury.
( c ) Interest shall be assessed at rates established from time to time by the Secretary of the Treasury on amounts remaining unpaid after their due date.
### [§2370a. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1005(a), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2036]

Section, added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title II, §214(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1586, related to medical countermeasures against biowarfare threats and allocation of funding between near-term and other threats.
§ 145.82 Participation. Participating flocks of primary meat-type chickens, and the eggs and chicks produced from them, shall comply with the applicable general provisions of subpart A of this part and the special provisions of this subpart H. ( a ) Started chickens shall lose their identity under Plan terminology when not maintained by Plan participants under the conditions prescribed in § 145.5(a).
( b ) Hatching eggs produced by primary breeding flocks should be nest clean. They may be fumigated in accordance with part 147 of this subchapter or otherwise sanitized.
( c ) Any nutritive material provided to chicks must be free of the avian pathogens that are officially represented in the Plan disease classifications listed in § 145.10.
( d ) Poultry must be protected from vectors known to be in the wild and thus must be housed in enclosed structures during brooding, rearing, grow-out, or laying periods with no intentional access to the outdoors, creatures found in the wild, or raised on open range or pasture, or be provided with untreated open source water such as that directly from a pond, stream, or spring that wild birds or vermin have access to for usage for drinking water, as a cooling agent, or during a wash down/clean out process.
[72 FR 1422, Jan. 12, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 38762, July 9, 2014; 83 FR 28354, June 19, 2018]
1 

## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00089

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.N.P., A CHILD

------------

FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT O F TARRANT COUNTY

------------


### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------
Appellant has attempted to appeal the trial court’s January 9, 2012 child

support modification order . W e notified appellant of our concern that we lacked

jurisdiction over the appeal because the trial court clerk had informed us that the

trial judge had not signed an order, and we informed appellant that because it

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.appeared that there was no final judgment or order subject to a ppeal, her notice

of appeal appeared to be premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 27.1(a).

We also informed appellant that the parties would have until March 27,

2012, to correct the defect in the record by furnishing this court a signed copy of

the order appellant seeks to appeal. And we warned that if no order had been

signed and furnished by that time, we would dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. See Tex . R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

As of April 20, 2012, we have received no signed order. Therefore, we

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL : MCCOY

, MEIER, and GABRIEL

, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 3, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2106-059]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) regulations contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (18 CFR Part 380 [FERC Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897]), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the McCloud-Pit Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2106), located on the McCloud and Pit Rivers in Shasta County, California and has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS) for the project. The project occupies 1651.4 acres of federal lands administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service.

The final EIS contains staff's analysis of the applicant's proposal and the alternatives for relicensing the McCloud-Pit Project. The final EIS documents the views of governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, affected Indian tribes, the public, the license applicant, and Commission staff.

                    Copies of the final EIS are available for review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “e-Library” link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits, to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659.                

                    You may also register online at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                    /                    *docs-filing/esubscription.asp*                     to be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.                

                    For further information, please contact Emily Carter at (202) 502-6512 or at                     *emily.carter@ferc.gov.*

Dated: February 25, 2011.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-4966 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# Q1-Q12

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS                                         	

# Q13-Q24

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS                                         	

# Q25-Q33

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS                                         	

# Q34-Q44

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS                                         	

# Q45-Q52

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS                                         	

# Q53-Q61

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS                                         	

# Q62-Q71

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS                                         	

# Q72-Q74

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS                                         	

# Q75-Q78

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS                                         	

# Q79-Q84

&"Arial" &B &12 &K007b7bPOSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4949]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Delta-Bienville Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Delta-Bienville Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Forest, Mississippi. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose is to hold the first meeting of the newly formed committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 14, 2011, and will begin at 6 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Bienville Ranger District 
Work Center, Hwy 501 South, 935A South Raleigh St, Forest, Mississippi 
39074. Written comments should be sent to Michael T. Esters, Bienville 
Ranger District Office, 3473 Hwy 35 South, Forest, Mississippi 39074. 
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d40485e59485f5e6d4b5e034b484903585e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f727a6c6b7a6d6c5f796c31797a7b316a6c">[email protected]</span></a>, or via 
facsimile to 601 469-2513.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at Bienville Ranger 
District Office, 3473 Hwy 35 South, Forest, Mississippi 39074. Visitors 
are encouraged to call ahead to 601 469-3811 to facilitate entry into 
the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nefisia Kittrell, RAC coordinator, 
USDA, Bienville Ranger District Office, 3473 Hwy 35 South, Forest, 
Mississippi; (601) 469-3811; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bf5f0f2efefe9fef7f7dbfde8b5fdfeffb5eee8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4babfbda0a0a6b1b8b894b2a7fab2b1b0faa1a7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Review project proposals and 
recommendations. Persons who wish to bring related matters to the 
attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting.

    Dated: February 28, 2011.
Michael T. Esters,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-4949 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §923. Notice

There shall be given notice of the commencement of a case under this chapter, notice of an order for relief under this chapter, and notice of the dismissal of a case under this chapter. Such notice shall also be published at least once a week for three successive weeks in at least one newspaper of general circulation published within the district in which the case is commenced, and in such other newspaper having a general circulation among bond dealers and bondholders as the court designates.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2623.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

Section 923 of the House amendment represents a compromise with respect to the notice provisions contained in comparable provisions of the House bill and Senate amendment. As a general matter, title 11 leaves most procedural issues to be determined by the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Section 923 of the House amendment contains certain important aspects of procedure that have been retained from present law. It is anticipated that the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will adopt rules similar to the present rules for chapter IX of the Bankruptcy Act [chapter 9 of former title 11].

#### house report no. 95–595

The notice provisions in section 923 are significantly more sparse than those provided under section 85(d) of chapter IX [section 405(d) of former title 11]. The exact contours of the notice to be given under chapter 9 are left to the Rules. Because the Rules deal with notice in a municipal case (Rule 9–14), and because section 405(d) of title IV of the bill continues those Rules in effect to the extent not inconsistent with the bill, the notice provisions of current law and Rules would continue to apply.
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of Glimcher Realty Trust (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark E. Yale,
      Exeutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, to the best of my
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







Date:
              February 23, 2007
            /s/
                Mark E. Yale


Mark
      E.
      Yale


Executive
      Vice President,


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Glimcher Realty Trust and will be retained
      by Glimcher Realty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.