alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 151.11 Form of books of record. ( a ) If a registry association has not published its book of record in printed form, a record in approved microfilm form which the Administrator finds provides a system for determining the recorded ancestry of the animals identified therein will be acceptable. When a registry association which has published its book of record in printed form ceases such publication and in lieu thereof publishes a microfilm record, the microfilm record shall commence with the first pedigree recorded by the association which is not in the printed volumes and shall otherwise be in approved form.
( b ) A microfilm record will be approved under this part only if it is 16 mm. non-perforated safety film exposed at a reduction ratio not to exceed 24 diameters. All information on the original document shall be reproduced onto the microfilm so that it is clearly readable. The microfilm carton shall be indexed to state the numbers of the pedigree certificates on the roll of film it contains.
[24 FR 2644, Apr. 7, 1959, as amended at 54 FR 34969, Aug. 23, 1989]
# C_2007017EN.01002402.xml

| 25.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4479 — News Corporation/JAMBA/OJOM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 17/05)

On 22 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4479. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4479. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Torvec, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal
controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 20, 2008

/s/  James Y. GleasmanJames Y. GleasmanChief Executive Officer and Interim Chief
Financial Officer 36
### §104. Removing restrictions

Any law removing for the duration of a war or national emergency proclaimed by the President any restriction contained in any then-existing law as applied to the Navy, including, but not limited to, restrictions relating to the manner in which purchases may be made and contracts awarded, fiscal operations, and personnel, shall, in the same manner and to the same extent, remove such restrictions as applied to the Coast Guard.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 550, §652; renumbered §104, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §103(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4195.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section is new and provides that any law removing for the duration of a war or national emergency any restriction contained in any then-existing law as applied to the Navy shall operate in the same manner to remove such restrictions as applied to the Coast Guard. Included are restrictions relating to the manner in which purchases may be made and contracts awarded, fiscal operations, and personnel. This provision is designed to enable the Coast Guard to operate as efficiently as the Navy Department in time of war or during a national emergency and would permit the Coast Guard more effectively to maintain itself in a state of military readiness during periods of emergency. Since the Coast Guard operates as part of the Navy in time of war, it is essential that its operations be as flexible and as efficient as those of the Department of which it is to be a part. This section would prevent inadvertent failures specifically to mention the Coast Guard in legislation of the type described in this section from hindering service operations. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 104 was renumbered section 528 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 652 of this title as this section.
§ 700.471 Review and approval. ( a ) Upon receipt of an application for financial assistance under this subpart, members of the Commission staff shall begin a preliminary review of the application with the intent of submitting a recommendation to the Commissioners of whether to accept or deny the application. The Commission staff may inform the applicant before its recommendation to the Commissioners, of any special problems or impediments which may result in a recommendation for disapproval; may offer any available technical assistance required to overcome such problems or impediments; and solicit the applicants written response.
( b ) The Commission staff may solicit comments on an application from technical specialists, community groups and others, when such advice is needed to fully evaluate the application.
( c ) The Commission staff shall forward the application with their recommendation to the Commissioners. The Commissioners may approve applications if they determine that: ( 1 ) The application meets the requirements of this subpart;
( 2 ) The application meets the intent of the Act;
( 3 ) The application fully demonstrates that it will expedite the relocation and resettlement of individuals under the Act and ease the hardship incurred by these individuals or by the Tribes;
( 4 ) The application is compatible with priorities identified by the Commission;
( 5 ) The applicant can carry out the activities described in the application and can maintain proper financial controls on the activities for which financial assistance is requested;
( 6 ) The applicant can and will comply with requirements for Indian preference in employment and training in connection with the administration of the grant, and preference to Indian organizations and Indian owned economic enterprises in the award of subcontracts or subgrants; and
( 7 ) Funds are available.
( d ) All applicants shall be notified in writing of the Commission's approval or disapproval of the grant applications.
§ 580.4 How do I effect service? ( a ) An appellant shall serve its notice of appeal on the Commission at the address indicated in the decision or notice that is the subject of the appeal.
( b ) Copies of the notice of appeal shall be filed personally or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. All subsequent documents shall be served personally, by facsimile, by email to an address designated by a Commission employee, or by first class mail. In matters where a hearing has been requested, all filings shall be made with the Commission until a presiding official is designated and the parties are so notified, after which all filings shall be made with the presiding official.
( c ) All documents filed after the notice of appeal shall be served on the Commission and copies concurrently served on all parties, intervenors, or limited participants.
( d ) Service of copies of all documents is complete at the time of personal service or, if service is made by mail, facsimile, or email, upon transmittal.
( e ) When a representative (including an attorney) has entered an appearance for a party, limited participant, or intervenor in a proceeding initiated under any provision of parts 582 through 585 of this subchapter, service thereafter shall be made upon the representative.
( f ) The Commission may extend the time for filing or serving any document, except a notice of appeal. ( 1 ) A request for an extension of time must be filed within the time originally allowed for filing.
( 2 ) For good cause, the Commission may grant an extension of time on its own motion.
( g ) Rules governing service of documents by the Chair or Commission are governed by part 519 of this chapter.
### §2152. Voluntary retirement after twenty years' service

Any regular commissioned officer who has completed twenty years' active service in the Coast Guard, Navy, Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force, or the Reserve components thereof, including active duty for training, at least ten years of which shall have been active commissioned service, may, upon his own application, in the discretion of the President, be retired from active service.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 187, §291; amended Pub. L. 99–348, title II, §205(b)(5), July 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 700; renumbered §2152, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §112(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §927(b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3831.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "Marine Corps, or Space Force" for "or Marine Corps".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 291 of this title as this section.

1986—Pub. L. 99–348 struck out ", with retired pay of the grade with which retired" after "from active service".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Retired Pay on or Prior to September 24, 1963

Savings provisions in section 5(g) of Pub. L. 88–130 providing that Pub. L. 88–130 does not affect the retired pay of anyone retired on or prior to Sept. 24, 1963, are set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
### §165. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, R.S. §5241, related to limitation of visitorial powers. See section 484 of this title.
# C_2007116EN.01000702.xml

| 26.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4665 — The Apollo Group/Claire's Stores)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 116/06)

On 22 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4665. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4665. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Metallurgical Evaluation of Anhydrous Ammonia Cargo Tank (Nurse Tank)                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Metallurgical Evaluation of Anhydrous Ammonia Cargo Tank (Nurse Tank) PDF                   

# Metallurgical Evaluation of Anhydrous Ammonia Cargo Tank (Nurse Tank)

**June 20, 2007**

The report is result of a failure analysis and metallurgical analysis of a cargo tank (commonly known as a Nurse Tank). The Nurse Tank failed in service from a cracked head. The purpose of this project was to determine the crack initiation site (CIS) and the cause of the tank failure.

**Key Words**: corrosion, crack initiation site, CIS, stress, wall stress, hydrostatic, chemical analysis, metallurgical evaluation, hydraulic fluid, hydrostatically tested, initial point of fracture

----

If you have any **technical questions** not addressed by this or associated documents, contact Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.
# C_2012343EN.01002203.xml

| 10.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/22

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 September 2012 — Allgeier v FRA

(Case F-58/10) (1)

1

(Civil service - Duty of assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Administrative inquiry)

2012/C 343/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Timo Allgeier (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented by: M. Kjærum, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the decision of the defendant not to pursue the complaint for psychological harassment lodged by the applicant. Second, application for recognition that the applicant has been a victim of psychological harassment on the part of his superiors, and for compensation for the material and non-material loss suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 16 October 2009 of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 16 October 2009 of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights;

| 2. | Orders the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights to pay Mr Allgeier the sum of EUR 5 000; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights to pay Mr Allgeier the sum of EUR 5 000;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 4. | Orders the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Allgeier. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Allgeier.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010, p. 27.

1

---
# C_2007100EN.01000301.xml

| 4.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4336 — MAN/Scania)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 100/05)

On 20 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4336. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4336. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### § 311.5 Swine erysipelas.

Carcasses affected with swine erysipelas which is acute or generalized, or which show systemic change, shall be condemned.
-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 9/30/99 FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>             0001062663
<NAME>            FULL TILTS SPORTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>      1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          58,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    153,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               569,834
<PP&E>                                          32,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 632,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,075
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        500
<COMMON>                                         3,827
<OTHER-SE>                                     474,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   632,213
<SALES>                                        133,913
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,117
<CGS>                                           84,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               755,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (626,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (626,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (626,413)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.17)


</TABLE>
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4318 — Veolia/Cleanaway)

(2006/C 187/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----