alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3750. Failure of selection for promotion

(a) A Reserve officer, other than one serving in the grade of captain, who is, or is senior to, the junior officer in the promotion zone established for the officer's grade, fails of selection if not selected for promotion by the selection board that considered the officer, or if having been selected for promotion by the board, the officer's name is thereafter removed from the report of the board by the President.

(b) A Reserve officer is not considered to have failed of selection if the officer was not considered by a selection board because of administrative error. If that officer is selected by the next appropriate selection board after the error is discovered, and is promoted, the same date of rank and precedence shall be assigned that would have been assigned if the officer had been recommended for promotion by the selection board that originally would have considered the officer but for the error.

(Added Pub. L. 96–322, §1, Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1013, §739; renumbered §3750, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §118(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 796 of this title prior to the complete revision of former chapter 21 of this title by Pub. L. 96–322.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 739 of this title as this section.
EX-35.5

(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE


Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of May 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master
Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, Midland Loan
Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as
Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2012-CCRE1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein
not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.


Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of its
performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my
supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2014.

/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


(logo) Together we'll go far
### §3906. Membership in other organizations

Members of the Auxiliary may be appointed or enlisted in the Reserve, pursuant to applicable regulations, and membership in the Auxiliary shall not be a bar to membership in any other naval or military organization.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 555, §825; renumbered §3906, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §119(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4236.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §264 (Feb. 19, 1941, ch. 8, title I, §5, 55 Stat. 10).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 825 of this title as this section.
# C_2006294EN.01002101.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/21

---

Order of the Court of 20 September 2006 — Jamal Ouariachi v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-4/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for damages - Non-contractual liability of the Community - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

(2006/C 294/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Jamal Ouariachi (represented by: F. Blanmailland, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Dintilhac and G. Boudot, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2005 in Case T-124/04 Ouariachi v Commission by which it dismissed, as being manifestly unfounded, the application brought by the present appellant for damages to compensate for the loss which he allegedly suffered as result of the alleged illegal conduct of a member of staff of the Commission delegation in Khartoum (Sudan)

Ouariachi

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Ouariachi is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Ouariachi is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 25.02.2006.

1

---
#### YORK v. NORTHERN HOSPITAL DISTRICT

No. 18P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 456

Petition by defendants (Guidetti and Anesthesia Associates) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 136194 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 136194 COA: 283254 Berrien CC: 07-403362-FH MICHAEL LEE GIBBS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
# C_2006224EN.01005102.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/51

---

Action brought on 3 August 2006 — Delta Protypos Viomichania Galaktos v OHIM — Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding (milko ΔΕΛΤΑ)

(Case T-204/06)

(2006/C 224/107)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Delta Protypos Viomichania Galaktos AE (Tavros, Greece) (represented by: P. Kanellopoulos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG (Zürich, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision rendered by the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM in its ruling No R0540/2005-2 dated June 8, 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision rendered by the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM in its ruling No R0540/2005-2 dated June 8, 2006;

| — | dismiss the opposition No B 562 423 brought by Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG against the registration of the Community Trade mark ‘MILKO ΔEΛTA with design’ No 2 474 674; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the opposition No B 562 423 brought by Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG against the registration of the Community Trade mark ‘MILKO ΔEΛTA with design’ No 2 474 674;

| — | order that the Community Trade mark ‘MILKO ΔEΛTA with design’ No 2 474 674 of the applicant be accepted; |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the Community Trade mark ‘MILKO ΔEΛTA with design’ No 2 474 674 of the applicant be accepted;

| — | order the OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘milko ΔΕΛΤΑ’ for goods in class 30 (milk with cocoa) — application No 2 474 674

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community, international and national figurative marks and word marks ‘MILKA’ for goods in classes 5, 29, 30 and 32

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the obvious and large differences of the two marks are sufficient to exclude any likelihood of confusion. According to the applicant, the two conflicting trade marks create overall a very different visual, phonetic and conceptual impression, especially when taking the second word ‘ΔEΛTA’ into consideration.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 124.20 Patent term extension calculation. ( a ) As provided in 37 CFR 1.779 of PTO's regulations, in order to determine a product's regulatory review period, APHIS will review the information in each application to determine the lengths of the following phases of the review period, and will then find their sum: ( 1 ) The number of days in the period beginning on the date authorization to prepare an experimental biological product under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act became effective and ending on the date an application for a license was initially submitted under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act; and
( 2 ) The number of days in the period beginning on the date an application for a license was initially submitted for approval under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act and ending on the date such license was issued.
( b ) A license application is “initially submitted” on the date it contains sufficient information to allow APHIS to commence review of the application. A product license is issued on the date of the APHIS letter informing the applicant of the issuance. The issuance of a license releases the product for commercial marketing or use.
§ 3.131 Sanitation. ( a ) *Cleaning of enclosures.* Excreta shall be removed from primary enclosures as often as necessary to prevent contamination of the animals contained therein and to minimize disease hazards and to reduce odors. When enclosures are cleaned by hosing or flushing, adequate measures shall be taken to protect the animals confined in such enclosures from being directly sprayed with the stream of water or wetted involuntarily.
( b ) *Sanitation of enclosures.* Subsequent to the presence of an animal with an infectious or transmissible disease, cages, rooms, and hard-surfaced pens or runs shall be sanitized either by washing them with hot water (180 F. at source) and soap or detergent, as in a mechanical washer, or by washing all soiled surfaces with a detergent solution followed by a safe and effective disinfectant, or by cleaning all soiled surfaces with saturated live steam under pressure. Pens or runs using gravel, sand, or dirt, shall be sanitized when necessary as directed by the attending veterinarian.
( c ) *Housekeeping.* Premises (buildings and grounds) shall be kept clean and in good repair in order to protect the animals from injury and to facilitate the prescribed husbandry practices set forth in this subpart. Accumulations of trash shall be placed in designated areas and cleared as necessary to protect the health of the animals.
( d ) *Pest control.* A safe and effective program for the control of insects, ectoparasites, and avian and mammalian pests shall be established and maintained.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5166]



[[Page 12739]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 1, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Comerica, Inc., Dallas, Texas; to acquire 100 percent of the 
voting shares of Sterling Bancshares, Inc., Houston, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 3, 2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-5166 Filed 3-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### §2747. Awards and insignia for excellence in service or conduct

The Coast Guard may award trophies, badges, and cash prizes to Coast Guard personnel or groups thereof, including personnel of the reserve components thereof whether or not on active duty, for excellence in accomplishments related to Coast Guard service, to incur such expenses as may be necessary to enter such personnel in competitions, and to provide badges or buttons in recognition of special service, good conduct, and discharge under conditions other than dishonorable.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 537, §503; renumbered §2747, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on the following language contained in the Coast Guard appropriation act for 1949, "Pay and Allowances" and preceding years: "not exceeding $10,000 for cash prizes for men for excellence in boatmanship, gunnery, target practice, and engineering competitions" (June 19, 1948, ch. 558, 62 Stat. 561).

This section expands the language contained in the appropriation act to include the awarding of trophies and badges, and to include in the accomplishments for which such awards may be made, excellence in any field related to Coast Guard duty. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 503 of this title as this section.
### §§462b, 462c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 462b, act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §19 (par.), as added May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title III, §46, 48 Stat. 54; amended Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §207, 49 Stat. 706; July 7, 1942, ch. 488, §2, 56 Stat. 648; July 28, 1959, Pub. L. 86–114, §§2(b), 3(b)(10), (11), 73 Stat. 263, 264, related to change of requirements as to reserves in order to prevent credit expansion or contraction, and was omitted from the Code in view of the striking out of the sixth par. of section 19 of act Dec. 23, 1913 (formerly comprising this section), and incorporation of its provisions in subsecs. (a) to (c) of section 19 of act Dec. 23, 1913 by section 2(a) of Pub. L. 89–597, Sept. 21, 1966, 80 Stat. 823. See section 461 of this title.

Section 462c, act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §19 (par.), as added Aug. 16, 1948, ch. 836, §2, 62 Stat. 1291, related to change of requirements as to reserves to check credit expansion, and terminated on June 30, 1949.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

59–011 2007

110th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 110–23 

NOTIFICATION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE 

AGREEMENT WITH THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH 

SECTION 2105(a)(1)(A) OF THE TRADE ACT OF 2002 (PUB. L. 107– 

210), RECEIVED APRIL 1, 2007, PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2112(e)(1) 

APRIL 16, 2007.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations and ordered to be printed 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with HEARING
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, April 1, 2007. 

Hon. NANCY PELOSI, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MADAM SPEAKER: Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of 

the 2002, (Public Law 107–210; the ‘‘Trade Act’’), I am pleased to 

notify the Congress of my intention to enter into a free trade agreement with the Republic of Korea. 

The United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement (the ‘‘Agreement’’) will generate export opportunities for U.S. farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, and service suppliers, promote economic 

growth and the creation of better paying jobs in the United States, 

and help American consumers save money while offering them 

greater choices. The Agreement will also further enhance the 

strong United States-Korea partnership, which has served as a 

force for stability and prosperity in Asia. 

Consistent with the Trade Act, I am sending this notification at 

least 90 days in advance of signing the Agreement. My Administration looks forward to working with the Congress in developing appropriate legislation to approve and implement this Agreement. 

Sincerely, 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with HEARING
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 25, 2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: EPA Region 1

SUBJECT: September 26, 2014, Discussion of Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants at Resilient Rhode Island’s Workshop on Greenhouse Gas 

Emissions Reductions 

SUMMARY

On September 26, 2014, the Resilient Rhode Island team at Brown University held an 

event titled, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions in RI: from Goals to Implementation.” 

Regional Administrator Curt Spalding discussed the Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants. 

ATTENDEES

Curt Spalding, EPA

J. Timmons Roberts, Brown University

Approximately 100 people attended this event. Attendance was not taken by EPA
§ 13.34 Evidence. ( a ) The ALJ will determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Except as provided in this part, the ALJ will not be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence where appropriate, e.g., to exclude unreliable evidence.
( c ) The ALJ will exclude irrelevant and immaterial evidence.
( d ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( e ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if it is privileged under Federal law.
( f ) Evidence concerning offers of compromise or settlement will be inadmissible to the extent provided in Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
( g ) The ALJ will permit the parties to introduce rebuttal witnesses and evidence.
( h ) All Documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record will be open to examination by all parties, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 13.24.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-39171 and No. 333-62890) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-59163, No. 333-59157, No. 333-21997, No.
333-86634, No. 333-94872, and No. 333-63804) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option
Plan and 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. of our
report dated February 2, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form
10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                            /s/   ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                            -------------------------------


Palo Alto, California
August 22, 2001


                                       56
§ 9032.9 Qualified campaign expense. ( a ) *Qualified campaign expense* means a purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit, or gift of money or anything of value— ( 1 ) Incurred by or on behalf of a candidate or his or her authorized committees from the date the individual becomes a candidate through the last day of the candidate's eligibility as determined under 11 CFR 9033.5;
( 2 ) Made in connection with his or her campaign for nomination; and
( 3 ) Neither the incurrence nor payment of which constitutes a violation of any law of the United States or of any law of any State in which the expense is incurred or paid, or of any regulation prescribed under such law of the United States or of any State, except that any State law which has been preempted by the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, will not be considered a State law for purposes of this subchapter.
( b ) An expenditure is made on behalf of a candidate, including a Vice Presidential candidate, if it is made by— ( 1 ) An authorized committee or any other agent of the candidate for purposes of making an expenditure;
( 2 ) Any person authorized or requested by the candidate, an authorized committee of the candidate, or an agent of the candidate to make the expenditure; or
( 3 ) A committee which has been requested by the candidate, by an authorized committee of the candidate, or by an agent of the candidate to make the expenditure, even though such committee is not authorized in writing.
( c ) Except as provided in 11 CFR 9034.4(e), expenditures incurred either prior to the date the individual becomes a candidate or after the last day of a candidate's eligibility will be considered qualified campaign expenses if they meet the provisions of 11 CFR 9034.4(a). Expenditures described under 11 CFR 9034.4(b) will not be considered qualified campaign expenses.
[56 FR 35929, July 29, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 31880, June 16, 1995; 68 FR 47418, Aug. 8, 2003]