alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 720.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Assistant Director for Relocation Operations shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be mailed to Assistant Director for Relocation Operations, Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Commission, P.O. Box KK, Flagstaff, Arizona 86002.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by paragraph (g) of this section. The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 22891, 22896, June 23, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 22891, June 23, 1986]
§ 9409.10 Restrictions that apply to testimony. ( a ) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on the testimony of Commission employees including, for example, limiting the areas of testimony or requiring the requester and other parties to the legal proceeding to agree that the transcript of the testimony will be kept under seal or will only be used or made available in the particular legal proceeding for which testimony was requested. The General Counsel may also require a copy of the transcript of testimony at the requester's expense.
( b ) The Commission may offer the employee's written declaration in lieu of testimony.
( c ) If authorized to testify under this part, an employee may testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge, but, unless specifically authorized to do so by the General Counsel, the employee shall not: ( 1 ) Disclose confidential or privileged information; or
( 2 ) For a current Commission employee, testify as an expert or opinion witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee's official duties or the functions of the Commission unless testimony is being given on behalf of the United States.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-66 

August 14, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041 Termination by Plan Administrator 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request for a letter from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC" or

"Corporation") concerning the return of mandatory employee contributions under the provisions of the 

It is our understanding that prior to July 31, 1975 benefit accruals, vesting and contributions had not ceased, further,

a valid termination notice has not been filed with the PBGC. On the basis of this information, it appears that this plan

had not terminated prior to July 31, 1975, for purposes of Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

1974. It appearingd that this plan had not terminated prior to July 31, 1975, PBGC does not object to benefit

distributions due and payable under the terms of the plan before such date to beneficiaries entitled thereto. 

We emphasize that our opinion is limited to and based upon the facts of this case. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Terremark Worldwide,
Inc.
 Date:  June 15, 2007
    /s/ Manuel D. MedinaChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 30.100 What is the purpose of this part? ( a ) This part establishes regulations regarding standards, assessments, and an accountability system at BIE-funded schools consistent with section 1111 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The Act requires the Secretary to develop or implement requirements for standards, assessments, and an accountability system for BIE-funded schools.
( b ) Nothing in this part may be construed to affect, modify, or diminish the sovereign rights of Indian Tribes; statutory rights under law, including the right to use Native American languages as a medium of instruction as described in the *Native American Languages Act,* Public Law 101-477; the Secretary's trust responsibility for Indian education; nor the trust responsibility of the United States to Indian Tribes or individual Indians. In carrying out the education mission of the Department, the BIE has an obligation to provide for a comprehensive multicultural and multilingual education program including the production and use of instructional materials, culturally appropriate methodologies and teaching and learning strategies that will reinforce, preserve, and maintain Indian and Alaska Native languages, cultures, and histories which school boards, Tribes and Alaska Native entities may utilize at their discretion.
( c ) In carrying out activities under this part, the Secretary will be guided by the policies stated in 25 CFR part 32.
### §3050. Fees for providing technical assistance services; waiver; accounting and availability

The Office may make the technical assistance services under this subchapter available for such fees as it may establish, except that such services as the Office may determine may be made available without charge to eligible cooperatives depending on the nature of the services or on ability to pay. Any fees collected shall be accounted for separately and be available for expenses of the Office.

(Pub. L. 95–351, title II, §210, Aug. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 513.)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-71 

August 27, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4048 Date of Termination 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of August 8, 1975 and subsequent telephone conversations with * * * of my staff

concerning the * * * ("the Plan"). 

As I understand the pertinent facts, the Plan was adopted effective January 1, 1964. On January 31, 1974 the * *

* ("the Association") sold its assets to another corporation ("the Buyer") and all of the then employees of the Association

became employees of the Buyer. The agreement of sale for the Association's assets made no mention of the Plan, and

the Plan's assets have continued to be held in trust. Although, at the time of the purchase of the Association's assets, the

buyer intended to establish a profit sharing plan to replace the Plan, it did not do so and it now has determined not to

continue the Plan. 

The Association has hired two employees since January 31, 1974, neither of whom has yet met the Plan's eligibility

requirements. As a result of the sale of assets and termination of employment, accruals and vesting both ceased after

January 31, 1974. In addition, no former employee of the Association has become eligible for retirement benefits since

January 31, 1974. Finally, the assets of the plan [*2] are sufficient to provide for full vesting of all benefits accrued as

of January 31, 1974. The Association now proposes formally to terminate the Plan and to purchase annuities for or

distribute lump sum payments to all plan participants. 

In your opinion, the Plan effectively terminated as of January 31, 1974; consequently, you do not think compliance

with the termination provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Act of 1974 is a necessary prerequisite for the

distribution of the Plan's assets. In view of the facts outlined above, I agree with these conclusions. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of NationsRent, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officer's knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


Date: August 14, 2002

                                       /s/ PHILIP V. PETROCELLI
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Philip V. Petrocelli
                                       Title: President and Chief Executive
                                              Officer



                                       /s/ EZRA SHASHOUA
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Ezra Shashoua
                                       Title  Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Management of

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.:

 

We haveexamined management's assertion, included in the accompanying CertificationRegarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Prudential AssetResources, Inc. (the "Company") compliedwiththeservicingcriteriasetforthinItem1122(d)oftheSecuritiesandExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for theCommercial Mortgage-Backed Security Transactions - RegAB Portfolio (the"Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C)&(D),1122(d)(3)(ii),1122(d)(3)(iii),1122(d)(3)(iv),and1122(d)(4)(xv),whichthe Company has determined are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform. Exhibit C to management'sassertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securitiesdefined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsiblefor the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestationstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company'scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examinationincluded testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities thatcomprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to thePlatform, and determining whether the Company processed those selectedtransactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selectedtransactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during theperiod covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detectnoncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequentto our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated orreported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliancewith the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company compliedwith the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the yearended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

February 22,2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP, 300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017*

*T: (646) 471 3000, F:(646) 471 8320, www.pwc.com/us*

* *
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for
the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Crowley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/JOHN P. CROWLEYJohn P. Crowley Chief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2008


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
### SUBCHAPTER III—FACULTY

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §110(c)(1)(D), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4215, inserted subchapter III designation and heading.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-21026

Conference Calendar

 

DANIEL LOUIS JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GAYNELLE GRIFFIN JONES,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-373

--------------------

August 26, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel Louis Johnson, Texas prisoner No. 465571, appeals the

dismissal of his petition for a writ of mandamus for failure to

authorize payment of the filing fee. However, Johnson has failed

to brief any issues related to the district court’s order of

dismissal. Although this court liberally construes the pleadings

of pro se appellants, arguments must still be briefed to be

preserved. Price v. Digital Equip. Corp., 846 F.2d 1026, 1028

(5th Cir. 1988)(citations omitted). Because Johnson has failed 
No. 98-21026 

-2-

to brief the only issue available to him on appeal, his appeal is

without merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d

215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is without

merit, it is dismissed. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

DISMISSED.
# C_2007003EN.01000101.xml

| 6.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 January 2007

(2007/C 3/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3084 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4532 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67470 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0726 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6097 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,14 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2830 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5783 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,635 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6979 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8731 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3877 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,425 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8762 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6697 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5374 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1914 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8885 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0084 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 222,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3518 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2117 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3710 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 791,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5958 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,915 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5230 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,841 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3084

JPY

Japanese yen

154,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4532

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67470

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0726

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6097

ISK

Iceland króna

92,14

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2830

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5783

CZK

Czech koruna

27,635

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6979

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8731

RON

Romanian leu

3,3877

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,425

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8762

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6697

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5374

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1914

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8885

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0084

KRW

South Korean won

1 222,57

ZAR

South African rand

9,3518

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2117

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3710

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 791,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5958

PHP

Philippine peso

63,915

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5230

THB

Thai baht

46,841

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.200 May persons who are not Indians or Alaska Natives assert claims under FTCA?

Yes. Non-Indian individuals served under the contract whether or not on a fee-for-service basis, may assert claims under this subpart.
### §§810 to 824. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 810, act May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title II, §29, 48 Stat. 46, prohibited making of loans or issuing of bonds after May 12, 1933, by joint-stock land banks.

Section 811, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374, provided for organization of joint-stock banks.

Section 812, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374, provided for individual liability of shareholders in joint-stock land banks.

Section 813, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374, covered powers, duties, and liabilities of joint-stock land banks.

Section 814, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374, placed a limit on amount of issue of bonds and prohibited transacting of unauthorized business.

Section 815, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, provided for minimum allowable capital stock for joint-stock land banks.

Section 816, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374, prohibited issuance of bonds before capital stock of joint-stock land banks was entirely paid up.

Section 817, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, set out required form for bonds issued by joint-stock land banks.

Section 818, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374; Mar. 4, 1931, ch. 518, §1, 46 Stat. 1548, set out interest rates and restrictions on mortgage loans for joint-stock land banks.

Section 819, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374, set a limitation on interest rates.

Section 820, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374, prohibited unauthorized commissions or charges by joint-stock land banks.

Section 821, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16, 39 Stat. 374; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, authorized issuance of bonds by joint-stock land banks.

Section 822, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16 (par.), as added May 29, 1920, ch. 215, 41 Stat. 691, and amended Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, provided for voluntary liquidation of joint-stock land banks.

Section 823, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16 (pars.), as added May 29, 1920, ch. 215, 41 Stat. 691; amended Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 524, §5, 43 Stat. 1263; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, provided for acquisition of assets of a liquidating joint-stock land bank.

Section 824, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §16 (par.), as added Mar. 4, 1931, ch. 518, §2, 46 Stat. 1548; amended Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, covered insolvency and receivership of joint-stock land banks.