alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1179

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the sale, delivery, or

other transfer of any type of firearm to a juvenile, with certain exceptions.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the sale,

delivery, or other transfer of any type of firearm to

a juvenile, with certain exceptions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Youth Access to Fire5 arms Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF THE SALE AND TRANSFER OF A

7 FIREARM TO A JUVENILE.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922(x)(1) of title 18,

9 United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
2

S 1179 IS

1 ‘‘(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to sell,

2 deliver, or otherwise transfer any firearm or ammu3 nition to a person who the transferor knows or has

4 reasonable cause to believe is a juvenile.’’.

5 (b) EXCEPTION FOR A RIFLE OR SHOTGUN FROM A

6 FAMILY MEMBER.—Section 922(x)(3) of title 18, United

7 States Code, is amended—

8 (1) redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as

9 subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively; and

10 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the fol11 lowing:

12 ‘‘(C) the sale, delivery, or transfer of a

13 shotgun or rifle or ammunition for a shotgun or

14 rifle to a juvenile from—

15 ‘‘(i) a parent, grandparent, or legal

16 guardian of the juvenile; or

17 ‘‘(ii) another member of the juvenile’s

18 family with the consent of the parent,

19 grandparent, or legal guardian of the juve20 nile;’’.

21 (c) EXCEPTION FOR A TEMPORARY TRANSFER OF A

22 RIFLE OR SHOTGUN FOR HUNTING.—Section

23 922(x)(3)(A)(ii) is amended—

24 (1) in subclause (I) , by striking the ‘‘or’’ at the

25 end;
3

S 1179 IS

1 (2) by redesignating subclause (II) as subclause

2 (III); and

3 (3) by inserting after subclause (I), the fol4 lowing:

5 ‘‘(II) with respect to hunting, a

6 rifle or shotgun may be temporarily

7 transferred to a juvenile without the

8 prior written consent of the juvenile’s

9 parent or guardian; or’’.

10 (d) APPLICATION OF EXISTING EXCEPTIONS.—Sec11 tion 922(x) is amended in paragraphs (3) and (4), by

12 striking ‘‘handgun’’ each place it appears and inserting

13 ‘‘firearm’’.

14 (e) CONFORMING AMENDMENT ON PENALTIES.—

15 Section 924(a)(6)(B)(ii) of title 18, United States Code,

16 is amended by striking ‘‘handgun’’ each place it appears

17 and inserting ‘‘firearm’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, March 18, 2011, 8 a.m. to March 18, 2011, 6 p.m., The River Inn, 924 25th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 8, 2011, 76 FR 6803-6805.                

The meeting will be held April 11, 2011, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. at the Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. Washington DC 20037. The meeting title has been changed to “ES10-002: Epigenetics and Human Disease II.” The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 22, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4362 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §212. Refusal or neglect of employees to perform duties

Whoever, being an employee referred to in subchapter II of chapter 1 of this title, and having taken and subscribed the oath of office, neglects or refuses, without justifiable cause, to perform the duties enjoined on such employee by this title, shall be fined not more than $500.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1022.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., §§122, 208, 252, and section 1442 of title 42, U.S.C., 1952 ed., The Public Health and Welfare (June 18, 1929, ch. 28, §8, 46 Stat. 23; June 19, 1948, ch. 502, §2, 62 Stat. 479; June 19, 1949, ch. 338, title VI, §607, 63 Stat. 441; Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 910, §2, 64 Stat. 784).

Section consolidates part of section 208 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., which was a part of chapter 4 of such title relating to the censuses of population, agriculture, etc., with those parts of sections 122 and 252 of such title which made such section 208 applicable to the censuses of manufacturers, the mineral industries and other businesses, and governments, and with that part of subsection (b) of section 1442 of title 42, U.S.C., 1952 ed., which made such section 208 applicable to the housing censuses. For remainder of sections 122, 208 and 252 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., and of section 1442 of title 42, U.S.C., 1952 ed., (which section has been transferred in its entirety to this revised title), see Distribution Table.

Section has been made applicable to all employees referred to in subchapter II of chapter 1 of this title, and to duties enjoined on them by any provision of this title, which was probably the original legislative intent.

The words "being an employee referred to in subchapter II of chapter 1 of this title" were substituted for the enumeration in section 208 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., of "supervisor, supervisor's clerk, enumerator, interpreter, special agent, or other employee", since such reference will cover those employees.

Reference in section 208 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., to the offense, herein described as a misdemeanor, and words therein ", and upon conviction thereof", were omitted, the former, as superseded and covered by section 1 of title 18, U.S.C., 1952 ed., Crimes and Criminal Procedure, classifying offenses, and the latter, as surplusage.

Changes were made in phraseology.
# C_2007129EN.01001403.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/14

---

Action brought on 25 April 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-218/07)

(2007/C 129/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou, W. Bogensberger, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 2003/109/EC (1) of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents by not adopting the necessary legislative and administrative measures for the implementation of that directive, or by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 2003/109/EC (1) of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents by not adopting the necessary legislative and administrative measures for the implementation of that directive, or by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission;

1

| — | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The prescribed period for implementing Directive 2003/109/EC expired on 23 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44.

1

---
#### § 311.28 Carcasses of young calves, pigs, kids, lambs, and foals.

Carcasses of young calves, pigs, kids, lambs, and foals are unwholesome and shall be condemned if (a) the meat has the appearance of being water-soaked, is loose, flabby, tears easily, and can be perforated with the fingers; or (b) its color is grayish-red; or (c) good muscular development as a whole is lacking, especially noticeable on the upper shank of the leg, where small amounts of serous infiltrates or small edematous patches are sometimes present between the muscles; or (d) the tissue which later develops as the fat capsule of the kidneys is edematous, dirty yellow, or grayish-red, tough, and intermixed with islands of fat.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOS International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allan J. Ligi, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\
|---

|Allan J. Ligi
|-------------

|Allan J. LigiPresident and Principal Executive Officer
|------------------------------------------------------

|February 19, 2007
|-----------------

---
OMB EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE (3 of 4) 

From:

Amy Hambrick/RTP/USEPA/US

To:

"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc:

David Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:

06/08/2012 03:29 PM

Subject:

Re: CISWI rule -- list of changes from 2011 final rule

Greetings Cortney, 

Will a redline of the 2011 rule work for you? We are aware of 93 CISWI units. 

Have a nice afternoon,

Amy

Amy Hambrick 

Fuels and Incineration Group 

US EPA / OAQPS / Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Phone: 919-541-0964 

"Higgins, Cortney" ---06/08/2012 10:12:38 AM---Hi Dave, Do you have a table or list of the changes from the 2011 final rule?

From:

"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To:

David Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Hambrick/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:

06/08/2012 10:12 AM

Subject:

CISWI rule -- list of changes from 2011 final rule

Hi Dave,

Do you have a table or list of the changes from the 2011 final rule?

Also, what’s the universe (number of affected sources) in the final rule?

I’ll be sending over interagency comments later today.

Thanks,

Cortney
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHRIS SEVIER, Plaintiff ,

v. ALAN LOWENTHAL, U.S. Representative for California’s 47th Con gressional District, et al. , Defendants. Civil Action No. 17-570 (RDM)

ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 8, is GRANTED ; and it is further ORDERED that the motion to intervene, Dkt. 5, is DENIED ; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to a mend the complaint, Dkt. 25, is DENIED ; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to f ile an overlength reply in support of the motion to amend the Complaint, Dkt. 30, is GRANTED ; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to file an overlength surreply to the motion to dismiss, Dkt. 32, is DENIED ; and it is further ORDERED that the motions for summar y judgment filed by the proposed in tervenors, Dkt. 34; Dkt. 47, are DENIED ; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a scheduling conference, Dkt. 36, is DENIED ; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s mo tion to strike, Dkt. 40, is DENIED ; and it is further2 ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions t o supplement, Dkt. 41; Dkt. 46, are DENIED ; and it is further ORDERED that the motions for leave to f ile amicus briefs filed by the National Alliance of Black Pastors, Dkt. 48, and C oalition of Doctors Defending R eparative Therapy, Dkt. 49, are GRANTED and that the briefs shall be deemed FILED ; and it is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED

. This Order constitutes the final judgment of the Court within t he meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). SO ORDERED

.

/s/ Ra ndolph D. Moss RANDOLPH D. MOSS United States District Judge Date: March 26, 2018
# C_2006326EN.01002602.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 11 October 2006 — Stahlwerk Ergste Westig GmbH v Finanzamt Düsseldorf-Mettmann

(Case C-415/06)

(2006/C 326/53)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Stahlwerk Ergste Westig GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Düsseldorf-Mettmann

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it compatible with Articles 56 EC and 58 EC for a German company with income from industrial or commercial activities to be precluded, when calculating its profits, from deducting losses from a permanent establishment in a non-member country (here: the United States) on the ground that, according to the applicable double taxation convention, the corresponding income from such a permanent establishment is not subject to taxation in Germany? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it compatible with Articles 56 EC and 58 EC for a German company with income from industrial or commercial activities to be precluded, when calculating its profits, from deducting losses from a permanent establishment in a non-member country (here: the United States) on the ground that, according to the applicable double taxation convention, the corresponding income from such a permanent establishment is not subject to taxation in Germany?

| 2. | Having regard to the proviso in Article 57(1) EC, is a convention provision with the above content compatible with Community law if the applicable provisions of the double taxation convention already existed on 31 December 1993 but the exclusion of taking account of losses resulting from those provisions had been removed up to 1998 by domestic German law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Having regard to the proviso in Article 57(1) EC, is a convention provision with the above content compatible with Community law if the applicable provisions of the double taxation convention already existed on 31 December 1993 but the exclusion of taking account of losses resulting from those provisions had been removed up to 1998 by domestic German law?

---
#### § 100.28 Telephone bank (52 U.S.C. 30101(24)).

*Telephone bank* means more than 500 telephone calls of an identical or substantially similar nature within any 30-day period. A telephone bank does not include electronic mail or Internet communications transmitted over telephone lines. For purposes of this section, *substantially similar* includes communications that include substantially the same template or language, but vary in non-material respects such as communications customized by the recipient's name, occupation, or geographic location.

[67 FR 49110, July 29, 2002]
U. S. Deport m e n t

of Tran spo rtat io n O ff i ce o f the S e c reto ry o f T r a n sp ort a t ion A ssistant Se c ret a ry 1 200 Ne w Je r s e y Ave n u e , S f Was hi ngto n, DC 20 ~ $ O 

## MAY 3.0 

## 201 4

Dear May o r G i ll: The Honorable Laurie Gill Mayor of the 

### City of Pierre 222 E a st Dakota A v e. P.O. Box 1253 Pierre , SD 57501-1253

Thank you for your recent Jetter regarding Great Lake A v iation ' s ( Gre at Lakes ) s e rv ice at Pierre . In the letter , you urge the D e partm e nt of Trans ortation (the Department) t o issue a Request for Proposals for replacement serv ice on the g ounds that Great Lakes ' s ervice i s unreliable and is no t meeti ng y our co mmunity ' s Essen lal A i r Servi ce (EAS ) needs. We are aware of Great Lake s' operational proble m s th t hav e be en caused b y a l a ck of p il ots due in part to rec e nt statutory and regulatory ch anges in v ol



### - ing pilot training requirements and the carri e r's implementation o f the ch anges. You are right that Great Lakes ' serv ice problems are , no t limited to Pierre ; rather , the carri e r ' s se rv ice has su fered system- w id e. . . In re s ponse t o the se v ere pilot shorta g e , w hich is not Ii i te d to Gre at L akes, th e c arrier h as taken some rather dras tic measures . During the first quarter f2014 , 

### it suspend e d or t e rminated service at 13 subs i dized E A S communiti es and an add i ional numb er of non- E AS commun iti es. In addition , a s of Apri l 1, Great Lakes began to op e rate Beech 190 0 aircraf t that have been rec o n f igured for 9 seats in order t o more e ffe cti v el y uti ize the pi l ots it has on staf f
. The recon f igured airc r af

t are intended to mor e qu ickl y u tili e new pilo t s that it h as h ired as a result o f the increased attrition that hampere d its abil i ty to ope r a e a full schedul e in the fir s t quarter of 201 4
. Great Lake s has i nd i cated to us that i t is worki n wel l and the carri er h as ex pand e d th e reconfiguration to more aircraf t in its fleet. I, along w ith the E AS p r ogram s t aff, met w ith Gre at L es in Was h ington , D.C. in late M arch in an attemp t to gather more information on their c u rre n t p er ati ons and what the c arrier intends to do mo vi ng forw ard t o imp ro v e i ts operation. The Departmen t will be monitoring GreatL akes ' se rv ic o ve r the ne xt fe w w eeks and if we do not see improvement , w e w ill consid e r taking step s that may be necessary t o ameliorate the

### -2-



### effects of their service reductions, cancellations; and hardship on the community, including the possibility of issuing a Request for Proposals as you recommend. A copy of this letter will be placed in Pierre's docket (Docket DOT-OST-2011-0138) on www.regulations.gov.
. Sincerely, 

# ~-M~~ ~/tL Susan L. Kurland Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs
Exhibit 32.1 BILLMYPARENTS, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of BillMyParents, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael McCoy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  |                        
|Date:  December 26, 2012 |  | /s/ Michael McCoy      
|                         |  | Michael McCoy          
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.














SENIOR MANAGEMENT BONUS PLAN














The following bonus plan shall become in effect for the senior management of Luminent Mortgage
Capital, Inc. (“Luminent”) effective for Luminent’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 and for
subsequent fiscal years. To the extent Luminent becomes engaged as a service provider to a
mortgage insurance company, those results will be included in the CRM segment. Bonus calculations
would be made by the Luminent Finance Department who would not participate in the CRM and asset
management bonus pools.



The bonus amount for CRM would be 10% of Luminent’s net income derived from the CRM business
with net income being calculated as:




	 	•	 	CRM gross revenues






	 	•	 	less CRM direct expenses






	 	•	 	less an allocable portion of Luminent’s other expenses that is currently estimated
at 5%






	 	•	 	the resulting bonus pool would be allocated among CRM staff at the discretion of
senior management after receiving recommendations from the Luminent Board.





The bonus amount for the asset management, or AM, business would be 20% of Luminent’s net
income derived from the AM business with net income being calculated as:




	 	•	 	AM gross revenues






	 	•	 	less AM direct expenses






	 	•	 	less an allocable portion of Luminent’s other expenses that is currently estimated
at 5%






	 	•	 	the resulting bonus pool would be allocated among AM staff at the discretion of
senior management after receiving recommendations from the Luminent Board.





The bonus pool for senior management (Messrs. Pashel and Papatheoharis) will be 20% of
Luminent’s net profits, including the deduction of the bonus amounts for CRM and AM referenced
above. The Compensation Committee will allocate the bonus amounts, if any, to senior management.



Finance Department personnel would be eligible for discretionary bonuses based on the
achievement of tangible goals to be annually specified by the Compensation Committee that would not
be profit-based.