alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 91.12 Business enterprises and public buildings.

No permanent business enterprises shall be carried on within the boundaries of a village reserve and no public buildings shall be erected on lands within the boundaries of a village reserve except on tracts described in § 91.5 maintained for the use and benefit of tribal members. The construction or acquisition of dwellings for rental purposes is prohibited. The village committee may grant permission and charge fees for temporary concessions within the village reserve during Indian celebrations, dances, community gatherings, etc., such temporary permits to last only for the term of activities for which granted.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 30293 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Randy L. Randall,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:11

- CR

- 317

- 8

Before **King, Higginson,**  and **Willett,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Randy L. Randall, federal prisoner # 15699

- 035, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. He contends that because the Government conceded in response to an earlier § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion that his allegations related to COVID

- 19

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 17, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30293 Document: 00516548893 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2022No. 22

- 30293

2 constituted an extraordinary and compelling circumstance, the district court could not consider the issue. In addition, Randall maintains that because his refusal to take the COVID

- 19 vaccine was based on a sincere ly held religious belief, the district court’s reliance on his refusal to deny relief violated his First Amendment rights. Finally, Randall argues that the district court should have taken into account the Custody Classification Form created by the Bureau of Prisons in analyzing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and should not have given weight to his criminal history or his prison disciplinary record.

We review for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693

- 94 (5th Cir. 2020). The district court conducted an independent review of the § 3553(a) factors and concluded that Randall was not entitled to relief. Randall has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in this conclusion. See id. at 693 ; see also Concepcion v. United States , 142 S. Ct 2389, 2404

- 05 (2022) . Because the district court’s independent § 3553(a) analysis supports the dismissal, it i s unnecessary to consider Randall’s arguments challenging the district court’s conclusion that he failed to show extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief. See United States v. Jackson , 27 F.4th 1088, 1093 & n.8 (5th Cir. 2022); Ward v. Unite d States , 11 F.4th 354, 360

- 62 (5th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 22-30293 Document: 00516548893 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2022
#### ADAMS v. BASS

No. 572P89

Case below: 88 N.C.App. 599

Petition by defendant for a writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 March 1990. Motion by plaintiff for sanctions denied 1 March 1990.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10381-10382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4182]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Medicinal Chemistry.
    Date: February 28, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call)
    Contact Person: Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review Officer, 
DHHS/NIH/NINDS/DER/SRB, 6001 Executive Boulevard; MSC 9529, 
Neuroscience Center; Room 3203, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-
5388, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#76211f13021e19040636181f18120558181f1e58111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ed9e7ebfae6e1fcfecee0e7e0eafda0e0e7e6a0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 10382]]


    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 17, 201.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4182 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
# C_2007073EN.01000202.xml

| 30.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4499 — Holding Gonvarri/ASSC/ASSC Slovakia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 73/04)

On 19 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4499. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4499. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                         0000912908
<NAME>                        FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INC
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   Dec-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     Sep-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                              1,916
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     142,410
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                        94,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  292,103
<PP&E>                            207,676
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    642,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             175,087
<BONDS>                           528,872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                              269
<OTHER-SE>                        (69,203)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      642,628
<SALES>                           233,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  233,434
<CGS>                             195,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     195,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   15,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 12,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    10,517
<INCOME-TAX>                        4,002
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 6,515
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        6,515
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.26
        

</TABLE>
§ 7.2 Scope. ( a ) This part applies to all employees, detailees, and non-contractor personnel inside and outside the Executive Branch who are granted access to classified information by the DHS, in accordance with the standards in Executive Order 13526, and its implementing directives, and Executive Order 13549, “Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Entities,” and its implementing directives.
( b ) This part does not apply to contractors, grantees and other categories of personnel falling under the purview of Executive Order 12829, National Industrial Security Program, as amended, and its implementing directives.
( c ) This part is independent of and does not affect any classification procedures or requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2011 *et seq.*).
( d ) This part does not, and is not intended to, create any right to judicial review, or any other right or benefit or trust responsibility, substantive or procedural, enforceable by a party against the United States, its agencies or instrumentalities, its officers or employees, or any other person. This part creates limited rights to administrative review of decisions. This part does not, and is not intended to, create any right to judicial review of administrative action.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (Nos. 333-118369 and 333-98331) and onForm S-3 (Nos. 333-123775, 333-102286 and 333-121133) of TerremarkWorldwide, Inc. of our reportdated August 4, 2005 relating to the consolidated financialstatements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appears in thisForm 10-K/A.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Miami, Florida
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 8 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       January 6, 1999.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions: Mr. Sanders.
    Committee on Government Reform: Mr. Sanders.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2007126EN.01000302.xml

| 7.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4494 — Evraz/Highveld)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 126/05)

On 20 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4494. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4494. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### § 201.302 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply:

*Covered producer* means a livestock producer as defined in this section or a swine production contract grower or poultry grower as defined in section 2(a) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 182(8), (14)).

*Livestock producer* means any person, except an employee of the livestock owner, engaged in the raising of and caring for livestock.

*Regulated entity* means a swine contractor or live poultry dealer as defined in section 2(a) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 182(8)) or a packer as defined in section 201 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 191).
§ 8.2 Debts that are covered. ( a ) The procedures covered by this part apply to debts that are either owed by current and former Commission employees, or arise from the provision of goods or services by contractors or vendors doing business with the Commission.
( b ) The procedures covered by this part do not apply to any of the following debts: ( 1 ) Debts that are covered by 11 CFR 111.51, regarding debts arising from compliance matters, administrative fines, alternative dispute resolution, repayments, and court judgments arising under the statutes specified in 11 CFR 111.51(a).
( 2 ) Debts involving criminal actions of fraud, the presentation of a false claim, or misrepresentation on the part of the debtor or any other person having an interest in the claim.
( 3 ) Debts based in whole or in part on conduct in violation of the antitrust laws.
( 4 ) Debts under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
( 5 ) Debts between the Commission and another Federal agency. The Commission will attempt to resolve interagency claims by negotiation in accordance with Executive Order 12146, 3 CFR pp. 409-12 (1980 Comp.).
( 6 ) Debts that have become subject to salary offset under 5 U.S.C. 5514.
### §4746. Reports

#### (a) Reserve funds report

On or before the last day of each calendar quarter, a participating State shall submit to the Fund a report of contributions to reserve funds made by the participating State during the previous calendar quarter. If the participating State has made contributions to one or more reserve funds during the previous quarter, the report shall—

(1) indicate the total amount of such contributions;

(2) indicate the amount of contributions which is subject to reimbursement, which shall be equal to the total amount of contributions, unless one of the limitations contained in section 4747 of this title is applicable;

(3) if one of the limitations in section 4747 of this title is applicable, provide documentation of the applicability of such limitation for each loan for which the limitation applies; and

(4) include a certification by the participating State that—

(A) the information provided in accordance with paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) is accurate;

(B) funds in an amount meeting the minimum requirements of section 4743(b)(3) of this title continue to be available and legally committed to contributions by the State to reserve funds, less any amount that has been contributed by the State to reserve funds subsequent to the State being approved for participation in the Program;

(C) there has been no unapproved amendment to any participation agreement or the form of participation agreements; and

(D) the participating State is otherwise implementing the Program in accordance with this subchapter and regulations issued pursuant to section 4749 of this title.

#### (b) Annual data

Not later than March 31 of each year, each participating State shall submit to the Fund annual data indicating the number of borrowers financed under the Program, the total amount of covered loans, and breakdowns by industry type, loan size, annual sales, and number of employees of the borrowers financed.

#### (c) Form

The reports and data filed pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) shall be in such form as the Fund may require.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title II, §256, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2212.)
UNITE D STAT ES EN VIRONME N TAL PROTECTIO N AGENCY RE G I ON 8

Ref: 8EPR-ERP Doug Goering Agriculture Commissioner "Jorth Dakota Department ofAgriculture 600 East Boulevard Avenue Bismarck. North Dakota 58505-0020 Dear Comrmssioncr Goering : 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227
- 8917 http:/ /www

. epa . gov/region08 

## DEC 1 3**~J 2** 



### 1l1c Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received your requ est to James Martin, dated September 13. 2012, for approval of delegation ofthe Risk Management Program (RM P) for agricultural anhydrous ammonia facilities in North Dakota. J wanted to let you knO\\ that we have been reviewing the documents contained in your request and coordinating v.rith members ofthe North Dakota Department ofAgricu lture and the North Dakota Attorney General's office. In additiOn, 1 wanted to point out some of the steps that arc required for approval of a request for assumption of the RM P program. They arc: I) a determination of the completeness of the request for approval , based on the criteria in Subpart E of 40 CFR Part 63. including an initial review ofthe authorities. statutes, regulations. and funding necessary for state assumption and operation of the RMP program: 2) an opportunity for the State to address any deficient clements that may be identified in step**I~** 3) a recommendation (ifappropriate) for approval from the R egion : 4) an opportunity for review by our Headquarters· program and counsel offices 5) a public notice and comment period of at least 30 days; and 6) final approval by Region 8 (ifapplicable)
.
I wanted to let you know that we arc currently working on the first step ofthe process-determining the compl eteness of the request for approval your Department submitted to us. We will let you know ifthere is anything additional that we w ill need prior to making that detennination. Once that is done, we will continue to work in a timely manner to complete the steps that occur within the Region and to work with our Headquart ers office on the other steps
. We look forward to working 

### with you and you r Department toward the fonna l assumption ofthe RMP program fo r agricultural anhydrous ammonia facilities. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Kathie Atencio, Preparedness Unit Chief. at 303-3 12-6803. Sincerely ,



# . I

. . (J /V**~'--- ~**  

# t__..;-\
Martin Hestmark Assistant Regional Administrator Office of Ecosystems Protection and Remediation
### §4208. Nonreviewability of action by Attorney General

Notwithstanding any other law, no court shall have jurisdiction over any claim based on any action taken by the Attorney General or any refusal to take action under this subchapter, except for failure to provide notification under section 4206 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2568, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4898.)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1202 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1202

  To require a warrant or consent before an inspection of land may be 
  carried out to enforce any law administered by the Secretary of the 
                               Interior.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 1999

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require a warrant or consent before an inspection of land may be 
  carried out to enforce any law administered by the Secretary of the 
                               Interior.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INSPECTIONS OF LAND TO ENFORCE LAWS ADMINISTERED BY THE 
              SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.

    (a) In General.--During fiscal year 2000 and each fiscal year 
thereafter, notwithstanding any law that authorizes any officer or 
employee of the Department of the Interior to enter private land for 
the purpose of conducting an inspection or search and seizure for the 
purpose of enforcing the law, any such officer or employee shall not 
enter any private land without first obtaining--
            (1) a warrant issued by a court of competent jurisdiction; 
        or
            (2) the consent of the owner of the land.
    (b) Violation and Emergency Exception.--An officer or employee of 
the Department of the Interior may enter private land without meeting 
the conditions described in subsection (a)--
            (1) for the purpose of enforcing the law, if the officer or 
        employee has reason to believe that a violation of law is being 
        committed; or
            (2) as required as part of an emergency response being 
        conducted by the Department of the Interior.
                                 <all>
```