alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
               METEOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS OF COMMON STOCK

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31               1996         1995          1994
-------------------------------    ----------   -----------  ------------
Income (loss) from continuing
 operations                        $  461,798   $  (73,641)  $  (129,532)

Discontinued operations, net of
 income taxes                              --    1,870,453       178,527
  
Net income                            461,798    1,796,812        48,995

Primary earnings per share:

Continuing operations              $      .15   $     (.15)  $ (1,295.32)

Discontinued operations                    --         3.82      1,785.27

Earnings per share                 $      .15   $     3.67   $    489.95

Weighted average number of 
  common shares outstanding         3,184,397      489,035           100

Fully diluted earnings per share(1)

Continuing operations              $      .14   $     (.15)  $ (1,295.32)

Discontinued operations                    --         3.82      1,785.27

Earnings per share                 $      .14   $     3.67   $    489.95

Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding          3,184,397      489,035           100

Common equivalent shares               37,432           --            --

Average number of common shares
 outstanding & equivalents          3,221,829      489,035           100

Primary earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for each period.  The calculation
excludes the effect of common equivalent shares resulting from stock options
using the treasury stock method as the effect would not be material.

Fully diluted earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average
number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding for each
period.

(1) Fully diluted earnings per share for 1995 are identical to primary
earnings per share as the effect of common equivalent shares would be
antidilutive.
<PAGE>
#### § 17.440 Health and insurance benefits and services.

Subject to § 17.235(d), in providing a medical, hospital, accident, or life insurance benefit, service, policy, or plan to any of its students, a recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, or provide such benefit, service, policy, or plan in a manner that would violate §§ 17.500 through 17.550 if it were provided to employees of the recipient. This section shall not prohibit a recipient from providing any benefit or service that may be used by a different proportion of students of one sex than of the other, including family planning services. However, any recipient that provides full coverage health service shall provide gynecological care.
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.43 Detection of chlamydial agents. The test for chlamydial agents provided in this section shall be conducted when such a test is prescribed in an applicable standard requirement or in a filed Outline of Production. ( a ) The yolk sac of 6-day-old chicken embryos shall be injected. Three groups of 10 embryos shall be used sequentially. ( 1 ) The inoculum for each embryo in the first group shall consist of 0.5 ml of a mixture of equal parts of the seed virus with phosphate buffered saline that may contain Streptomycin, Vancomycin, Kanamycin, or a combination thereof. Not more than 2 mg/ml of each antibiotic shall be used.
( 2 ) On the 10th day postinoculation, the yolk sac of viable embryos shall be harvested, pooled, homogenized as a 20 percent suspension in phosphate buffered saline antibiotic diluent, and 0.5 ml of the mixture injected into the second group of chicken embryos. This process shall be repeated for the injection of the third group of embryos using the yolk sacs of viable embryos from the second group.
( 3 ) For each of the three passages, embryo deaths occurring within 48 hours of injection shall be disregarded, except that if more than three such deaths occur at any passage, that passage shall be repeated.
( b ) If one or more embryo deaths occur at any passage after 48 hours postinjection, the yolk sacs from each of the dead embryos shall be subcultured into 10 additional embryos. If one or more embryo deaths again occur due to chlamydial agents, the Master Seed Virus is unsatisfactory for use to produce vaccine.
[44 FR 58899, Oct. 12, 1979]
#### § 81.52 Who may initiate a petition?

A member of the tribe who is 18 years of age or older whose tribe's governing document or charter of incorporation permits tribal members to petition the Secretary to authorize a Secretarial election.
§ 115.65 Coordinated response. ( a ) Each facility shall develop a written institutional plan to coordinate actions taken by staff first responders, medical and mental health practitioners, investigators, and facility leadership in response to an incident of sexual abuse.
( b ) Each facility shall use a coordinated, multidisciplinary team approach to responding to sexual abuse.
( c ) If a victim of sexual abuse is transferred between facilities covered by subpart A or B of this part, the sending facility shall, as permitted by law, inform the receiving facility of the incident and the victim's potential need for medical or social services.
( d ) If a victim is transferred from a DHS immigration detention facility to a facility not covered by paragraph (c) of this section, the sending facility shall, as permitted by law, inform the receiving facility of the incident and the victim's potential need for medical or social services, unless the victim requests otherwise.
**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER** **EXHIBIT 32.1****REGARDING FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDING**  **JUNE 30, 2004, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-**  **Oxley Act of 2002**  
     I, Nello Gonfiantini III, Chairman of the Board, President and Secretaryof Specialty Trust, Inc. (the Company), hereby state, certify and attest inthis written statement that:
     (a) The quarterly report of the Company filed on form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (b) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.      /s/ NELLO GONFIANTINI III Dated this 16th of August, 2004   Name: Nello Gonfiantini III  *Title:* *Chairman of the Board, President*   *and Secretary*   *(Chief Executive Officer)*  
*This certification is madesolely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any otherpurpose.*
32
§ 102.6 Conditional licenses. In order to meet an emergency condition, limited market, local situation, or other special circumstance, including production solely for intrastate use under a State-operated program, the Administrator may, in response to an application submitted as specified in § 102.3(b) of this part, issue a conditional U.S. Veterinary Biological Product License to an establishment under an expedited procedure which assures purity and safety, and a reasonable expectation of efficacy. Preparation of products under a conditional license shall be in compliance with all applicable regulations and standards and may be restricted as follows: ( a ) The preparation may be limited to a predetermined time period which shall be established at the time of issuance and specified on the license. Prior to termination of the license, the licensee may request reissuance. Such requests shall be substantiated with data and information obtained since the license was issued. After considering all data and information available, the Administrator shall either reissue the U.S. Veterinary Biological Product License or allow it to terminate.
( b ) Distribution may be limited to the extent necessary to assure that the product will meet the basic criteria for issuance of the conditional license.
( c ) Labeling for the product may be required to contain information on the conditional status of the license.
[52 FR 11026, Apr. 7, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 48021; Sept. 18, 1995]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0273]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Current Good Manufacturing Practice Quality System Regulation” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Daniel Gittleson, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-                              ( print page 2124)                            400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-5156,                         *Daniel.Gittleson@FDA.HHS.GOV.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 18, 2010 (75 FR 63834), the Agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0073. The approval expires on December 31, 2013. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

Dated: January 6, 2011.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-455 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
### §1020n–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts June 30, 1939, ch. 253, title II, 53 Stat. 979; June 25, 1940, ch. 421, 54 Stat. 569; July 1, 1941, ch. 267, 55 Stat. 444; July 22, 1942, ch. 516, 56 Stat. 701, related to the personal liability of Federal employees approving loans fraudulently obtained under sections 1020i to 1020n and 1020o of this title, which were repealed by act Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, §2(a)(2), 60 Stat. 1062.
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

Map 3-5

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_3\Tortoise.pdf

Location in Arizona

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Tortoise Habitat

Management Units

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate

Data Source:

Habitat Information: BLM 2003

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: US Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

Legend

Habitat Category

Category 1

Category 2

Category 3

Sonoran Desert
### §93a. Authority to prescribe rules and regulations

Except to the extent that authority to issue such rules and regulations has been expressly and exclusively granted to another regulatory agency, the Comptroller of the Currency is authorized to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the responsibilities of the office, except that the authority conferred by this section does not apply to section 36 of this title or to securities activities of National Banks under the Act commonly known as the "Glass-Steagall Act".

(R.S. §5239A, as added Pub. L. 96–221, title VII, §708, Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 188.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Glass-Steagall Act, referred to in text, probably refers to act June 16, 1933, ch. 89, 48 Stat. 162, also known as the Banking Act of 1933 or the Glass-Steagall Act, 1933, rather than to act Feb. 27, 1932, ch. 58, 47 Stat. 56, known as the Glass-Steagall Act, 1932. Section 16 of the 1933 act, which amended section 24 (Seventh) of this title, related in part to securities activities of national banks. For complete classification of these Acts to the Code, see Tables.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                         0000912908
<NAME>                        FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INC
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                   Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     Dec-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                             22,203
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     126,573
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       101,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  307,104
<PP&E>                            195,373
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    619,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             170,523
<BONDS>                           483,344
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                              267
<OTHER-SE>                        (58,370)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      619,846
<SALES>                           926,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  926,351
<CGS>                             773,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     773,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   58,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 53,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    49,161
<INCOME-TAX>                       16,669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                32,492
<DISCONTINUED>                   (114,480)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    (1,147)
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (83,135)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (3.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (3.23)
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas Stanton *v.*Michael Dudley.

New *trial—verdict against the evidence.*In this case the judgment is reversed because the verdict of the jury is contrary to the evidence.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William A. Porter, Judge, presiding.

Mr. M. A. Delaney, and Mr. Charles Ferm, for the appellant.

Messrs. Richardson & Hull, for the appellee.

*326Mr. Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action to recover for money lent and for board. The only witnesses were the parties themselves. As to the item for money lent, their testimony was directly contradictory. As to the board, the defendant, in his testimony, admitted there was a balance of $3 due to the plaintiff for that, and he undertook to counter-balance it by a certain claim of set-off, which the court rejected, and which the defendant then withdrew. This left the defendant’s liability to the extent of $3 complete, as admitted by himself, yet the jury found for the defendant, and the court refused to grant a new trial.

The plaintiff testified to four weeks board at $5 per week! that defendant had paid only $10, and that there was a balance of $10 due.

The defendant testified to five weeks board at $5 pe.r week; that he had paid' $20, and done $2 worth of hauling for the plaintiff, and that the remaining $3 he had not paid and did not intend to pay, on account of the item of set-off rejected and withdrawn as aforesaid.

The only mode of arriving, from the evidence, at such a verdict as the jury found, was by taking the plaintiff’s statement as to the number of weeks board, and rejecting his statement as to the amount paid, and by rejecting the defendant’s statement as to the number of weeks board, and taking his statement as to the amount he had paid, and by discarding the testimony of both parties in regard to the balance due on account of board.

■ This mode of dealing with testimony, in order to reach a finding in favor of one party, can not be justified.

It was incumbent on the defendant to establish whatever payment he had made by a preponderance of testimony. There was, admittedly, according to the testimony of both parties, a balance due the plaintiff,

The court below should have granted a new trial, because the verdict was contrary to the evidence.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                  
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.



| |     |                     
| | --- | --------------------
| | By: | /s/ Richard P. Brown

| |                                             
| | --------------------------------------------
| |                                             
| | Richard P. Brown                            
| | Chief Executive Officer of GB Holdings, Inc.
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Organization 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Eastern Region

## About the Office

The Eastern Regional Office, based in West Trenton, NJ, is comprised of personnel from the Office of Pipeline Safety and the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety. The office is charged with overseeing the safe and secure movement of daily shipments of hazardous materials by all modes of transportation, as well as ensuring the safe, reliable, and environmentally sound operation of the nation's pipeline infrastructure.

The area of responsibility for this region is listed below; however, the jurisdiction of PHMSA staff is nationwide and not limited to their regional area of responsibility.

States: Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio (Office of Pipeline Safety), Ohio (Office of Hazardous Materials Safety), Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia

## Contact Information

## Management
# C_2007096EN.01003001.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/30

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 29 March 2007 — Scott SA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-366/00) (1)

1

(State aid - Land sale price - Decision ordering the recovery of aid incompatible with the common market - Errors in the calculation of the aid - Obligations of the Commission with regard to the calculation of the aid - Rights of the recipient of aid - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 13(1))

(2007/C 96/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Scott SA, (Saint-Cloud (France)) (represented by: Sir Jeremy Lever QC, G. Peretz and J. Gardner, Barristers, and R. Griffith and M. Papadakis, Solicitors,)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and J. Flett, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: French Republic, represented by G. de Bergues, S. Seam and F. Million, Agents),

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberly-Clark (OJ 2002 L 12, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 2 of Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberly-Clark to the extent that it concerns the aid granted in the form of a preferential price for the property referred to in Article 1; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 2 of Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberly-Clark to the extent that it concerns the aid granted in the form of a preferential price for the property referred to in Article 1;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant relating to the proceedings before the Court of First Instance; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant relating to the proceedings before the Court of First Instance;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs relating to the proceedings before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs relating to the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 24.2.2001.

1

---