alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 514.6 What are the quarterly statements that must be submitted with the fee payments? ( a ) Each gaming operation shall file with the Commission quarterly statements showing its assessable gross revenues for the assessed fiscal year.
( b ) These statements shall show the amounts derived from each type of game, the amounts deducted for prizes, and the amounts deducted for the allowance for capital expenditures for structures.
( c ) The quarterly statements shall identify an individual or individuals to be contacted should the Commission need to communicate further with the gaming operation. A telephone number and email address for each individual identified shall be included.
( d ) Each quarterly statement shall include the computation of the fees payable, showing all amounts used in the calculations. The required calculations are as follows: ( 1 ) Multiply the Tier 1 assessable gross revenues by the rate for those revenues adopted by the Commission.
( 2 ) Multiply the Tier 2 assessable gross revenues by the rate for those revenues adopted by the Commission.
( 3 ) Add (total) the results (products) obtained in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section.
( 4 ) Multiply the total obtained in paragraph (d)(3) of this section by 1 ⁄ 4.
( 5 ) Adjust for prior amounts paid and credits received, if applicable. The gaming operation shall provide a detailed justification for the adjustment.
( 6 ) The amount computed in paragraph (d)(5) of this section is the amount to be remitted.
( e ) As required by part 571 of this chapter, quarterly statements must be reconciled with a tribe's audited or reviewed financial statements for each gaming location. These reconciliations must be made available upon the request of any authorized representative of the Commission.
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          ISO9809-3VSDOT3A (PDF)                   
                  -                                          ISO7866VS49 CFR (PDF)                   
                  -                                          PressureDrum ISO21172VS49 CFR (PDF)                   
                  -                                          ISO4706VS49 CFR (PDF)                   
                  -                                          ISO11119-2DOTCFFC (PDF)                   
                  -                                          ISO 10461VS49 CFR (PDF)                   
                  -                                          Gas Table (PDF)                   
                  -                                          DOTFina1202 (PDF)                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          ISO9809-3VSDOT3A PDF                   
                  -                                          ISO7866VS49-CFR PDF                   
                  -                                          PressureDrumISO21172VS49-CFR PDF                   
                  -                                          ISO4706VS49-CFR PDF                   
                  -                                          FRP-1-CFFC-ISO11119-2-LastVersion PDF                   
                  -                                          ISO-10461VS49-CFR PDF                   
                  -                                          Gas Table PDF                   
                  -                                          DOT-Fina1202 PDF                   

# Technical Support Relating to Gas Cylinders Design, Operation and Re-qualification

**November 1, 2002**

Summary of technical evaluation and comparison for the the UN Model Regulations pertaining to design, operation, inspection and requalification of gas cylinders

**Key Words:** UN model regulations, cylinders, UN cylinders

If you have any **technical questions** not addressed by this or associated documents, contact Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.

[NOTE: The attached documents are in PDF format, you can download a free viewer.  If you have problems accessing the PDFs or the information, report your problem for further assistance.]
# C_2006178EN.01001401.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/14

---

Order of the Court of 27 April 2006 — L v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-230/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Harassment - Commission's duty to provide assistance - Liability - Refusal by the Court of First Instance to allow the examination of witnesses - Offer of supplementary evidence which did not exist at the closing of the written procedure - Refusal to withdraw an allegedly defamatory document from the file - Obligation to provide reasons - Principal of sound administration - Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)

(2006/C 178/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: L (represented by: P. Legros and S. Rodrigues, avocats)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Curral, Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2005 in Case T-254/02 L v Commission in which the Court of First Instance dismissed, first, the action for annulment of the decisions of the Commission rejecting the request for assistance, access to documents and compensation and refusing to recognise an occupational disease and, secondly, the claim for damages for the loss suffered as a result of those decisions

L

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001062780
<NAME> UNITED WISCONSIN SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,166
<SECURITIES>                                   127,422
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               237,501
<PP&E>                                          10,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          236,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,052
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   302,623
<SALES>                                        392,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               396,268
<CGS>                                          398,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,306)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,774)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,774)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
<FN>
<F1>Included in #13 (receivables)
<F2>INCLUDED IN #17 (PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT)
<F3>INCLUDED IN #29 (GGS)
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the
Company), for the three and nine months ended September 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stewart York, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stewart York       
|Stewart York           
|Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 20, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Leuck *v.*Schindler.

[No. 12,189.

Filed April 23, 1925.

Rehearing denied June 26, 1925.]

From Benton Circuit Court; *Burton B. Berry,*Judge.

Action by Frederica Schindler against Jacob Leuck. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. *Affirmed.*By the second division.

*Joseph B. Ross*and *E. Grant Hall,*for appellant.

*Elmore Barce*and *J. Edward Barce,*for appellee.

Nichols, J.

Action by appellee against appellant to recover $900 which she claimed to have loaned him, to .be repaid to her upon demand. Appellant was the son-in-law of appellee, and claimed that the money was given by appellee to her daughter, his wife, because she had not received her full share of the estate. The only question presented is error of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, under which, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict in favor of appellee, upon which judgment was rendered. There is a sharp conflict in the evidence, but, the jury, after hearing it, believed appellee. After reading the evidence as set out in appellant’s brief, and supplemented by appellee in her brief, we are inclined ourselves to believe appellee’s statement. ' Certainly there was ample evidence to sustain the verdict.

Affirmed.
§ 108.7 Effect on State law (52 U.S.C. 30143). ( a ) The provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, and rules and regulations issued thereunder, supersede and preempt any provision of State law with respect to election to Federal office.
( b ) Federal law supersedes State law concerning the— ( 1 ) Organization and registration of political committees supporting Federal candidates;
( 2 ) Disclosure of receipts and expenditures by Federal candidates and political committees; and
( 3 ) Limitation on contributions and expenditures regarding Federal candidates and political committees.
( c ) The Act does not supersede State laws which provide for the— ( 1 ) Manner of qualifying as a candidate or political party organization;
( 2 ) Dates and places of elections;
( 3 ) Voter registration;
( 4 ) Prohibition of false registration, voting fraud, theft of ballots, and similar offenses;
( 5 ) Candidate's personal financial disclosure; or
( 6 ) Application of State law to the funds used for the purchase or construction of a State or local party office building to the extent described in 11 CFR 300.35.
[45 FR 15117, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 67 FR 49119, July 29, 2002]
# C_2007016EN.01000202.xml

| 24.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4446 — Arrow Electronics/IN Technology)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 16/03)

On 19 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4446. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4446. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
H. Res. 403

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 27, 2000.

Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, before Monday,

May 15, 2000, the hour of daily meeting of the House shall

be 2 p.m. on Mondays; 11 a.m. on Tuesdays; and 10 a.m.

on all other days of the week; and from Monday, May 15,

2000, until the end of the second session, the hour of daily

meeting of the House shall be noon on Mondays; 10 a.m. on

Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all

other days of the week.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

House Calendar No. 213

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 482

[Report No. 106–600]

Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the

rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 the legislative day of Wednesday, May 3, 2000, for the

3 Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules, pro4 vided that the object of any such motion is announced

5 from the floor at least one hour before the motion is of6 fered. In scheduling the consideration of legislation under

7 this authority, the Speaker or his designee shall consult

8 with the Minority Leader or his designee.
2

HRES 482 RH

1 SEC. 2. House Resolution 469 is laid on the table.

House Calendar No. 213

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 482

[Report No. 106–600]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of motions to

suspend the rules.

MAY 2, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 114.1 Applicability.

Unless exempted by regulation or otherwise authorized by the Administrator, all biological products prepared, sold, bartered or exchanged, shipped or delivered for shipment in or from the United States, the District of Columbia, any Territory of the United States, or any place under the jurisdiction of the United States shall be prepared in accordance with the regulations in this part. The licensee or permittee shall adopt and enforce all necessary measures and shall comply with all directions the Administrator prescribes for carrying out such regulations.

[52 FR 11026, Apr. 7, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 66784, Dec. 26, 1991]
§ 101.1 Candidate designations (52 U.S.C. 30102(e)(1), (g)). ( a ) *Principal Campaign Committee.* Within 15 days after becoming a candidate under 11 CFR 100.3, each candidate, other than a nominee for the office of Vice President, shall designate in writing, a principal campaign committee in accordance with 11 CFR 102.12. A candidate shall designate his or her principal campaign committee by filing a Statement of Candidacy on FEC Form 2, or, if the candidate is not required to file electronically under 11 CFR 104.18, by filing a letter with the Commission containing the same information (that is, the individual's name and address, party affiliation, and office sought, the District and State in which Federal office is sought, and the name and address of his or her principal campaign committee). Each principal campaign committee shall register, designate a depository, and report in accordance with 11 CFR parts 102, 103, and 104.
( b ) *Authorized committees.* A candidate may designate additional political committees in accordance with 11 CFR 102.13 to serve as committees which will be authorized to accept contributions or make expenditures on behalf of the candidate. For each such authorized committee, other than a principal campaign committee, the candidate shall file a written designation with his or her principal campaign committee. The principal campaign committee shall file such designations with the Commission.
[84 FR 18699, May 2, 2019]
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1713V

UNPUBLISHED

LISA K. MATHIS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: March 11, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Anaphylaxis

Nancy Routh Meyers, Ward Black Law, Greensboro, NC, for petitioner.

Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On November 5, 2018, Lisa K. Mathis filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered anaphylaxis as a result of an 

influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on November 13, 2017. Petition at Preamble. 

The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 12, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concedes that Petitioner experienced 

anaphylaxis within an hour of receiving the vaccine at issue. Id. at 3. Respondent 

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

further agrees that “there is not preponderate evidence of an alternate cause for 

[P]etitioner’s anaphylaxis” and the medical records demonstrate that Petitioner has 

suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. Id. at 3-4.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
§ 700.263 Assuring integrity of records. ( a ) *Statutory requirement.* The Privacy Act requires that records subject to the Act be maintained with appropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards to insure the security and confidentiality of records and to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to their security or integrity which could result in substantial harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness to any individual on whom information is maintained, 5 U.S.C. 522a(e)(10).
( b ) *Records maintained in manual form.* When maintained in manual form, records subject to the Privacy Act shall be maintained, at a minimum, subject to the following safeguards, or safeguards affording comparable protection: ( 1 ) Areas in which the records are maintained or regularly used shall be posted with an appropriate warning stating that access to the records is limited to authorized persons. The warning shall also summarize the requirements of § 700.265 and state that the Privacy Act contains a criminal penalty for the unauthorized disclosure of records to which it applies.
( 2 ) During working hours, ( i ) the area in which the records are maintained or regularly used shall be occupied by authorized personnel or
( ii ) access to the records shall be restricted by their storage in locked metal file cabinets or a locked room.
( 3 ) During non-working hours, access to the records shall be restricted by their storage in locked metal file cabinets or a locked room.
( c ) *Records maintained in computerized form.* When maintained in computerized form, records subject to the Privacy Act shall be maintained, at a minimum, subject to safeguards based on those recommended in the National Bureau of Standards booklet “Computer Security Guidelines for Implementing the Privacy Act of 1974” (May 30, 1975), and any supplements thereto, which are adequate and appropriate to assuring the integrity of records in the system.
( d ) *Civil Service Commission personnel records.* A system of records made up of Civil Service Commission personnel records shall be maintained under the security requirements set out in 5 CFR 293.108.
(logo) TORCHLIGHT

           LOAN SERVICES

 

 

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

 

WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C7 (the “Trust”)

 

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to RBS Commercial Funding Inc., the Depositor, and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1. I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date: March 11, 2016

 

 

TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC

 

 

By: /s/ Jacob Baron 

Name: Jacob Baron

Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

475 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017

T 212.883.2800 F 212.883.2560

E info@torchlightloanservices.com

www.torchlightinvestors.com