alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 9407.2 Definitions. As used in this part, the term— *Commission* means the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, established by the Help America Vote Act of 2002, 42 U.S.C. 15301 *et seq.*
*Commissioner* means an individual appointed to the Commission by the President and confirmed by the Senate under section 203 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002, 42 U.S.C. 15323.
*Executive Director* means the Executive Director of the Commission or his or her designee.
*General Counsel* means the General Counsel of the Commission or his or her designee.
*Meeting* means the deliberations of at least three Commissioners where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official Commission business. A deliberation conducted through telephone or similar communications equipment in which all persons participating can hear each other shall be considered a meeting. For the purposes of this section, “joint conduct” does not include situations where the requisite number of members is physically present in one place but not conducting agency business as a body. In addition, the term “meeting” does not include a process of notation voting by circulated memorandum for the purpose of expediting consideration of official Commission business. The term “meeting” also does not include deliberations on whether to: ( 1 ) Schedule a meeting;
( 2 ) Hold a meeting with less than seven days notice, as provided in § 9407.4(e);
( 3 ) Change the subject matter of a publicly announced meeting or the determination of the Commission to open or close a meeting or portions of a meeting to public observation, as provided in § 9407.4(f);
( 4 ) Change the time or place of an announced meeting, as provided in § 9407.4(g);
( 5 ) Close a meeting or portions of a meeting, as provided in § 9407.5; or
( 6 ) Withhold from disclosure information pertaining to a meeting or portions of a meeting, as provided in § 9407.5.
*Public observation* means attendance by one or more members of the public at a meeting of the Commission but does not include participation in the meeting.
*Public participation* means the presentation or discussion of information, raising of questions, or other manner of involvement in a meeting of the Commission by one or more members of the public in a manner that contributes to the disposition of Commission business.
§ 2.128 Inspection for missing animals. Each dealer, exhibitor, intermediate handler and carrier shall allow, upon request and during business hours, police or officers of other law enforcement agencies with general law enforcement authority (not those agencies whose duties are limited to enforcement of local animal regulations) to enter his or her place of business to inspect animals and records for the purpose of seeking animals that are missing, under the following conditions: ( a ) The police or other law officer shall furnish to the dealer, exhibitor, intermediate handler or carrier a written description of the missing animal and the name and address of its owner before making a search.
( b ) The police or other law officer shall abide by all security measures required by the dealer, exhibitor, intermediate handler or carrier to prevent the spread of disease, including the use of sterile clothing, footwear, and masks where required, or to prevent the escape of an animal.
### §1701w. Budget, debt management, and related counseling services for mortgagors; authorization of appropriations

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is authorized to provide, or contract with public or private organizations to provide, such budget, debt management, and related counseling services to mortgagors whose mortgages are insured under section 1715z(i) or (j)(4) of this title as he determines to be necessary to assist such mortgagors in meeting the responsibilities of homeownership. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title I, §101(e), Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 484.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and not as part of the National Housing Act which comprises this chapter.
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

# Technical Reports

The following is a list of Research Projects and Technical Reports. When you click a report you will see a brief description of the contents, a list of key words related to the content, and a link to the PDF.

If you have any technical questions not addressed by these documents, contact Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.
# C_2007095EN.01004002.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/40

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 March 2007 — Beyatli and Candan v Commission

(Case T-455/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Open competition - Notice of competition - Time-limits - Compalint - Inadmissibility)

(2007/C 95/81)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Derya Beyatli (Nicosia, Cyprus) and Armagan Candan (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: A. Demetriades, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 5 May 2004 of the president of the selection board of open competition EPSO/A/1/03 notifying the applicants of their failure in the written tests

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Each of the parties is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each of the parties is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 57 of 5.1.2005.

1

---
H. Res. 76

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 24, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 438) to promote and enhance public safety

through use of 911 as the universal emergency assistance

number, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration

of the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII

are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Commerce. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

Commerce now printed in the bill. Each section of the com-
2

•HRES 76 EH

mittee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the

portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall

be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House

on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of

a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage
3

•HRES 76 EH

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
1

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00089-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF 

S.N.P., A CHILD

------------

FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant has attempted to appeal the trial court’s January 9, 2012 child 

support modification order. We notified appellant of our concern that we lacked 

jurisdiction over the appeal because the trial court clerk had informed us that the 

trial judge had not signed an order, and we informed appellant that because it 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 
appeared that there was no final judgment or order subject to appeal, her notice 

of appeal appeared to be premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 27.1(a).

We also informed appellant that the parties would have until March 27, 

2012, to correct the defect in the record by furnishing this court a signed copy of 

the order appellant seeks to appeal. And we warned that if no order had been 

signed and furnished by that time, we would dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

As of April 20, 2012, we have received no signed order. Therefore, we 

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 3, 2012
§ 513.32 What are the hearing procedures when the Commission is the creditor agency? ( a ) To request a hearing, the debtor must file, within 15 days of receiving the Commission's notice of intent to offset, a written petition signed by the debtor and addressed to the Commission stating why the debtor believes the Commission's determination of the existence or amount of the debt is in error. The Commission may waive the 15-day time limit for filing a request for hearing if the employee shows that the delay was due to circumstances beyond his or her control or because the employee did not receive notice of the 15-day time limit. A debtor who has previously obtained a hearing to contest a debt that arose from a notice of violation or proposed civil fine assessment matters under 25 CFR parts 580 through 585 may not re-litigate matters that were at issue in that hearing.
( b ) Regardless of whether the debtor is a Commission employee, the Commission will provide a prompt and appropriate hearing before a hearing official who is not from the Commission.
( c ) The hearing will be conducted according to the FCCS review requirements at 31 CFR 901.3(e).
( d ) Unless the employee requests, and a hearing official grants, a delay in proceedings, within 60 days after the petition for hearing the hearing official will issue a written decision on: ( 1 ) The determination of the creditor agency concerning the existence or amount of the debt; and
( 2 ) The repayment schedule, if a schedule was not established by written agreement between the employee and the creditor agency.
( e ) If the hearing official determines that a debt may not be collected by salary offset but the Commission has determined that the debt is valid, the Commission may seek collection of the debt through other means in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
( f ) The form of hearings, written responses, and final decisions will be according to the Commission's review requirements at § 513.7. Written decisions regarding salary offset that are provided after a request for hearing must state: The facts purported to evidence the nature and origin of the alleged debt; the hearing official's analysis, findings, and conclusions as to the employee's or creditor agency's grounds; the amount and validity of the alleged debt; and, where applicable, the repayment schedule.
[66 FR 58057, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended at 80 FR 31994, June 5, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1313 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1313

     To enable the State of Rhode Island to meet the criteria for 
   recommendation as an Area of Application to the Boston-Worcester-
Lawrence; Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and Connecticut Federal 
                           locality pay area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 1999

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To enable the State of Rhode Island to meet the criteria for 
   recommendation as an Area of Application to the Boston-Worcester-
Lawrence; Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and Connecticut Federal 
                           locality pay area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rhode Island Federal Worker Fairness 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL LOCALITY PAY IN RHODE ISLAND.

    Section 5304 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j) For purposes of this section, the 5 counties of the State of 
Rhode Island (including Providence, Bristol, Newport, Kent, and 
Washington counties) shall be considered as 1 county, adjacent to the 
Boston-Worcester-Lawrence; Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and 
Connecticut locality pay area and the Hartford, Connecticut locality 
pay area.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Harry Velasquez, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chair of the Board of Parole, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 740]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Stein, J.), entered March 20, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner appeared before the Board of Parole in June 2004 and his request for parole release was denied. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, which was later dismissed by Supreme Court. This appeal ensued.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that during the pendency of this appeal, petitioner reappeared before the Board and was conditionally released to parole supervision in August 2006. In view of this, the instant matter is now moot and the appeal must be dismissed *(see Matter of Lomonaco v Dennison,*29 AD3d 1144 [2006]; *Matter of Mitchell v Travis,*14 AD3d 955, 956 [2005]).

Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-2

                          CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST
                        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
               TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                              ----------------------------------------------------
                                                2000       1999       1998       1997       1996
                                              --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                           <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Available earnings:
  Net income................................  $54,686    $48,760    $32,248    $27,260    $14,941
  Add interest expense (1)..................   33,131     21,859     15,476     10,871     10,992
                                              -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
Available earnings (2)......................  $87,817    $70,619    $47,724    $38,131    $25,933
                                              =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Combined fixed charges:
  Interest expense..........................  $33,131    $21,859    $15,476    $10,871    $10,992
  Capitalized interest......................    3,404      1,926      2,214        893        142
  Preferred dividends.......................   10,105      8,318      6,360        901        947
                                              -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
Total fixed charges.........................  $46,640    $32,103    $24,050    $12,665    $12,081
                                              =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed
  charges...................................     1.88       2.20       1.98       3.01       2.15
                                              =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>

------------------------

NOTES:

(1) Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing costs.

(2) Interest portion of rental expense is not calculated because annual rental
    expense for the Company is not significant.

                                      F-36
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0001005229
<NAME>                  COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-03-1999
<CASH>                                              20,071
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      132,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        114,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   300,580
<PP&E>                                             138,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                      48,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     777,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              113,350
<BONDS>                                            430,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               149
<OTHER-SE>                                         196,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       777,390
<SALES>                                            363,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   363,609
<CGS>                                              276,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      276,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    54,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     16,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,906
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,906
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .49


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert L. Montgomery,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 14, 2002



                                                 /S/ ROBERT L. MONTGOMERY, JR.
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Robert L. Montgomery,  Jr.
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
# C_2006224EN.01003206.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/32

---

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 19 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-308/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 224/66)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 1.10.2004.

1

---
### §635o. Congressional statement of purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is—

(1) to expand employment and economic growth in the United States by expanding United States exports to the markets of the developing world;

(2) to stimulate the economic development of countries in the developing world by improving their access to credit for the importation of United States products and services for developmental purposes;

(3) to neutralize the predatory financing engaged in by many nations whose exports compete with United States exports, and thereby restore export competition to a market basis; and

(4) to encourage foreign governments to enter into effective and comprehensive agreements with the United States to end the use of tied aid credits for exports, and to limit and govern the use of export credit subsidies generally.

(Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VI, §642], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1263.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this part", meaning part C (§§641–647, 650) of title VI of Pub. L. 98–181, title I, Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1263, known as the Trade and Development Enhancement Act of 1983, which enacted this subchapter and section 1671g of Title 19, Customs Duties, and amended sections 1671a and 1671b of Title 19. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VI, §641], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1263, provided that: "This part [part C (§§641–647, 650) of title VI, enacting this subchapter and section 1671g of Title 19, Customs Duties, and amending sections 1671a and 1671b of Title 19] may be referred to as the 'Trade and Development Enhancement Act of 1983'."