alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007135EN.01000201.xml

| 19.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/2

---

Recruitment notice PE/106/S

(2007/C 135/02)

The European Parliament is organising the following selection procedure:

PE/106/S — Temporary staff member — Administrators (AD5) specialising in research in the field of information and communications technologies (ICTs).

PE/106/S

This selection procedure requires a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies of at least three years attested by a diploma relevant to the job description.

No professional experience is required.

This recruitment notice is being published in English and French only. The full text can be found in Official Journal C 135 A in those two languages.

---
# C_2010246EN.01003201.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/32

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands), lodged on 8 July 2010 — A. Salemink v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (UWV)

(Case C-347/10)

()

2010/C 246/53

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A. Salemink

Applicant:

Defendant: Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (UWV)

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the rules forming part of European Community law which are designed to bring about free movement for workers, in particular the rules set out in Titles I and II of Regulation No 1408/71 (1) as well as in Articles 39 and 299 of the EC Treaty (now respectively Articles 45 TFEU and 52 TEU, in conjunction with Article 355 TFEU) preclude an employee working outside Netherlands territory on a fixed installation on the Netherlands section of the continental shelf for an employer established in the Netherlands from being in a position in which he is not insured under national statutory employee insurance solely on the ground that he is not resident in the Netherlands but in another Member State (in this case, Spain), even if he has Netherlands nationality and can also avail of the option to take out voluntary insurance under essentially the same conditions as those which apply to compulsory insurance?

1

---

(1)  Regulation of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416).

1

---
# C_2007126EN.01002101.xml

| 7.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/21

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2007/C 126/15)

OJ C 78, 11.4.2007

OJ C 78, 11.4.2007

History of previous publications:

OJ C 332, 30.12.2006

OJ C 317, 23.12.2006

OJ C 303, 13.12.2006

OJ C 225, 19.9.2006

OJ C 184, 8.8.2006

OJ C 176, 28.7.2006

---
§ 200.4 Disposition of petitions. ( a ) After considering the comments that have been filed within the comment period(s) and any other information relevant to the subject matter of the petition, the Commission will decide whether to initiate a rulemaking based on the filed petition.
( b ) If the Commission decides not to initiate a rulemaking, it will give notice of this action by publishing a Notice of Disposition in the Federal Register and notifying the petitioner. The Notice of Disposition will include a brief statement of the grounds for the Commission's decision, except in an action affirming a prior denial.
( c ) The Commission may reconsider a petition for rulemaking previously denied if the petitioner submits a written request for reconsideration within 30 calendar days after the date of the denial and if, upon the motion of a Commissioner who voted with the majority that originally denied the petition, the Commission adopts the motion to reconsider by the affirmative vote of four members.
[57 FR 34510, Aug. 5, 1992, as amended at 89 FR 219, Jan. 2, 2024]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel Forbush, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 19, 2008

/s/ Daniel ForbushDaniel Forbush 
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 37.4 Incorporation by reference. Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at DHS Headquarters in Washington DC, please email *requesttoreviewstandards@hq.dhs.gov .* For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from the following sources: ( a ) American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) 4301 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22203; website: *www.aamva.org .* ( 1 ) 2005 AAMVA Driver's License/Identification Card Design Specifications, Annex A, section A.7.7.2., March 2005 (AAMVA Specifications); IBR approved for § 37.17.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), I CAO, Document Sales Unit, 999 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 5H7; email: *sales@icao.int .* ( 1 ) ICAO 9303, “Machine Readable Travel Documents,” Volume 1, part 1, Sixth Edition, 2006; IBR approved for § 37.17.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) International Organization for Standardization, Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland; phone: +41 22 749 01 11; email: *customerservice@iso.org ;* website: *www.iso.org/contact-iso.html .* (Also available by contacting ANSI at ANSI, 25 West 43rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10036 website: *www.ansi.org .*) ( 1 ) ISO/IEC 19794-5:2005(E) Information technology—Biometric Data Interchange Formats—Part 5: Face Image Data, dated June 2005; IBR approved for § 37.17.
( 2 ) ISO/IEC 15438:2006(E) Information Technology—Automatic identification and data capture techniques—PDF417 symbology specification, dated June 2006; IBR approved for § 37.19.
[88 FR 44192, July 12, 2023]
§ 162.12 Informal conference. ( a ) The Veterinary Official, in consultation with the State Animal Health Official and the accredited veterinarian, shall designate the time and place for the holding of an informal conference to review the matter, unless the Veterinary Official determines that an informal conference is inappropriate. An informal conference is inappropriate only if the Veterinary Official decides to dismiss the case based on available facts, or if civil or criminal charges based on the actions or inactions believed to be in violation of the “Standards for Accredited Veterinarian Duties” contained in § 161.4 of this subchapter are pending against the accredited veterinarian. An informal conference shall include the Veterinary Official or his or her representative, the accredited veterinarian, and any other persons the Veterinary Official requests to attend due to their involvement in or knowledge of the possible violation. The State Animal Health Official will be invited to attend each informal conference held regarding activities in his or her State.
( b ) If prior to, during, or after the informal conference, but prior to the issuance of a formal complaint, the accredited veterinarian is found not to have violated the regulations, the Veterinary Official will issue a letter dismissing the case, and provide a copy of the letter to the accredited veterinarian and to the State Animal Health Official. Prior to, during, or after the informal conference, the Veterinary Official may issue a letter identifying actions of the accredited veterinarian that were minor violations of the Standards, instructing the accredited veterinarian in proper procedures, and admonishing the accredited veterinarian to use greater care in performing these procedures in the future.
( c ) Prior to, during, or at the conclusion of the informal conference, the Veterinary Official may issue a written warning to the accredited veterinarian without further procedure after determining that a warning with appropriate instructions will be adequate to attain compliance with the Standards.
( d ) If prior to, during, or at the conclusion of, the informal conference, the accredited veterinarian consents, in writing, to the issuance of an order revoking or suspending his or her accreditation for a specified period of time, in lieu of further procedure, the Veterinary Official may issue such a consent order without further procedure.
[57 FR 54915, Nov. 23, 1992; 57 FR 60086, Dec. 18, 1992, as amended at 74 FR 65013, Dec. 9, 2009; 75 FR 57659, Sept. 22, 2010; 85 FR 10565, Feb. 25, 2020]
#### §§ 317.357-317.359 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eugene B. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |                                                              
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/EUGENE B. JOHNSONEugene B. Johnson Chief Executive
Officer
| |  | August 9, 2007                                               

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
### §§660 to 665. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 660, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §3, 39 Stat. 361; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, provided for submission of statements covering salaries paid by land banks.

Section 661, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §3, 39 Stat. 361; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, required filing of an annual report to Congress by Farm Credit Administration. See section 2221 et seq. of this title.

Section 662, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §3, 39 Stat. 361; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §101(d), 73 Stat. 384, provided for examinations and reports. See section 2254 of this title.

Section 663, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §3, 39 Stat. 361; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 785, title III, §301(a), 69 Stat. 664; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, provided for statements of condition of land bank associations and land banks. See section 2254 of this title.

Section 664, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §3, 39 Stat. 361; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, authorized preparation of bulletins and circulars by Farm Credit Administration. See section 2252 of this title.

Section 665, acts Jan. 23, 1932, ch. 9, §6, 47 Stat. 14; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 785, title I, §110(d), 69 Stat. 662, authorized Farm Credit Administration to make rules and regulations. See section 2252 of this title.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2007069EN.01000203.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/2 |

---

Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Grand Chamber and the Second, Third, Sixth and Seventh Chambers

(2007/C 69/04)

At its meeting on 16 January 2007, the Court drew up the list, referred to in Article 11b(2) of the Rules of Procedure, for the purposes of determining the composition of the Grand Chamber, as follows:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Schintgen |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Toader |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Tizzano |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Arabadjiev |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Cunha Rodrigues |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr von Danwitz |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Silva de Lapuerta |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Bonichot |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Sir Konrad Schiemann |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Lindh |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Makarczyk |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Bay Larsen |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Kūris |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Ó Caoimh |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Juhász |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Levits |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Arestis |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Lõhmus |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Borg Barthet |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Klučka |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Ilešič |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Malenovský |

At its meeting on 16 January 2007, the Court drew up the lists, referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure, for the purposes of determining the composition of the Second and Third Chambers, as follows:

Second Chamber

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Sir Konrad Schiemann |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Toader |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Makarczyk |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Bonichot |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Kūris |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Bay Larsen |

Third Chamber

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Cunha Rodrigues |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Arabadjiev |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Klučka |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Lindh |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Lõhmus |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr O'Caoimh |

At its meeting on 16 January 2007, the Court drew up the lists, referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure, for the purposes of determining the composition of the Sixth and Seventh Chambers, as follows:

Sixth Chamber

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Sir Konrad Schiemann |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Makarczyk |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Bay Larsen |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Bonichot |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Toader |

Seventh Chamber

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Cunha Rodrigues |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Lõhmus |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr O'Caoimh |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Lindh |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Arabadjiev |

---
# C_2007129EN.01002801.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/28

---

Action brought on 23 April 2007 — Cros v Court of Justice

(Case F-37/07)

(2007/C 129/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alexia Cros (Howald, Luxembourg) (represented by: E. Reveillaud, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) of 19 July 2006 appointing the applicant probationary official as a lawyer-linguist with effect from 1 September 2006 in that she is classified at grade AD7; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) of 19 July 2006 appointing the applicant probationary official as a lawyer-linguist with effect from 1 September 2006 in that she is classified at grade AD7;

| — | Declare and hold that, retroactively to the date of appointment of 1 September 2006, the applicant is to be classified at grade A*10 corresponding to grade LA6 before the entry into force of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare and hold that, retroactively to the date of appointment of 1 September 2006, the applicant is to be classified at grade A*10 corresponding to grade LA6 before the entry into force of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities (1);

1

| — | Order the full reconstitution of her career with effect retroactively to 1 September 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the full reconstitution of her career with effect retroactively to 1 September 2006;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submits that the contested decision, based on Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations, infringes:

| — | notice of open competition CJ/LA/24 (2), pursuant to which the recruitment of successful candidates would be made at grade LA7/LA6; |
| --- | --- |

—

notice of open competition CJ/LA/24 (2), pursuant to which the recruitment of successful candidates would be made at grade LA7/LA6;

2

| — | the principle of equal treatment; |
| --- | --- |

—

the principle of equal treatment;

| — | the principle of legitimate expectations and the principles of sound administration, transparency and the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials. |
| --- | --- |

—

the principle of legitimate expectations and the principles of sound administration, transparency and the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials.

---

(1)  OJ L 124, 27.4.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 182 A, 31.7.2002, p. 1.

2

---
EQUITYSOURCEPARTNERS, LLC 7 E. CARVER STREET HUNTINGTON, NY 11743 631-923-1414   Mr. Jonathan Shultz April 30, 2010 Chief Financial Officer SCLW, Inc. 6440 Lusk Boulevard
Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92121  Re: Socialwise, Inc.  (SCLW)  Dear Jonathan:  As per our earlier discussions I am writing to confirm the agreement between SCLW and Equity Source Partners (ESP) regarding ESPs introduction of Maxim Group LLC (Maxim) to SCLW, regarding the current financing.  We have agreed that should the introduction to Maxim result in an actual investment into SCLW, SCLW will pay ESP a fee equal to a maximum of 300,000 warrants as follows: 150,000 total warrants should Maxim deliver $1,000,000 in gross proceeds; 225,000 total warrants should Maxim deliver $1,500,000 in gross proceeds; 300,000 total warrants should Maxim deliver $2,000,000 in gross proceeds;  Should Maxim deliver more than $2,000,000 in proceeds then ESP and SCLW will negotiate in good faith regarding additional warrants.  The warrants paid to ESP will be identical to the warrants paid to Maxim as compensation for their efforts.  Your signature below indicates your agreement to these terms.  Best regards, Agreed to:  /s/ Cary Sucoff /s/ Jonathan Shultz Cary Sucoff Jonathan Shultz Equity Source Partners Socialwise, Inc
### §1134. Acquisition, production, deployment, and support

(a) In General.—The Commandant shall—

(1) ensure there is a stable and efficient production and support capability to develop an asset or capability for the Coast Guard;

(2) conduct follow-on testing to confirm and monitor performance and correct deficiencies; and

(3) conduct acceptance tests and trials prior to the delivery of each asset or system to ensure the delivered asset or system achieves full operational capability.

(b) Elements.—The Commandant shall—

(1) execute production contracts;

(2) ensure that delivered assets and capabilities meet operational cost and schedules requirements established in the acquisition program baseline;

(3) validate manpower and training requirements to meet system needs to operate, maintain, support, and instruct the assets or capabilities; and

(4) prepare an acquisition project or program transition plan to enter into programmatic sustainment, operations, and support.

(Added Pub. L. 111–281, title IV, §402(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2947, §574; renumbered §1134, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §108(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 574 of this title as this section.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Federal Trade Commission report to Congress for pursuant to the FederalCigarette Labeling and Advertising Act**** 
SuDocNumber:FT1.36/2:
ItemNumber:0535-A-13(online)
CGPSystem Number: 000599812
 
1995
1996
1997
1998**
§ 9410.6 Request for correction or amendment to record. ( a ) Any individual who has reviewed a record pertaining to him or her that was furnished under this part may request that the Commission correct or amend all or any part of that record.
( b ) Each individual requesting a correction or amendment shall send or provide in person the written request to the Commission through the person who furnished the record.
( c ) Each request for a correction or amendment of a record shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the individual requesting the correction or amendment;
( 2 ) The name of the system of records in which the record sought to be amended is maintained;
( 3 ) The location of the system of records from which the individual record was obtained;
( 4 ) A copy of the record sought to be amended or corrected or a sufficiently detailed description of that record;
( 5 ) A statement of the material in the record that the individual desires to correct or amend; and
( 6 ) A statement of the basis for the requested correction or amendment including any material that the individual can furnish to substantiate the reasons for the correction or amendment sought.