### 36056 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices

p.m. Requests to participate in the meeting must be received on or before July 7, 2014.

To request accommodation of a disability, please contact the person listed under **FOR FURTHER INFORMATON**
**CONTACT**, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), One Potomac Yard (South Building), First Floor Conference Center (S–1200), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Melanie Biscoe or Christopher Koper, Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 305–7106 and (703) 347–8065; fax number: (703) 347–8011; email address: biscoe.melanie@epa.gov and koper.christopher@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me?

You may be potentially affected by this action if you are required to conduct testing of chemical substances under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), or the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:

• Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and

Hunting NAICS code 11

• Utilities NAICS code 22

• Professional, Scientific and Technical

NAICS code 54 B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0879, is available
at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available
at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Background

On a biannual interval, an Exposure Modeling Public Meeting (EMPM) is held for presentation and discussion of current issues related to modeling pesticide fate, transport, and exposure for risk assessment in a regulatory context. Meeting dates and abstract requests are announced through the ‘‘empmlist’’ forum on the LYRIS list
server at https://lists.epa.gov/read/all

_ forums/.
III. How can I request to participate in this meeting?

You may submit a request to participate in this meeting to the person listed under **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION**
**CONTACT**. Do not submit any information in your request that is considered CBI. Requests to participate in the meeting, identified by docket ID number EPA– HQ–OPP–2009–0879, must be received on or before July 7, 2014. IV. Tentative Topics for the Meeting
Spatial Aquatic Modeling (SAM) Terrestrial Plant Exposure Modeling

(Audrey III Model)
Surface Water Concentration Calculator

(SWCC) Evaluation
Pesticide Root Zone Model—Ground

Water (PRZM–GW) Updates
Unextracted Residues Guidance EPA Suggestions for Ecotox

Presentations Endangered Species Exposure Modeling Population Modeling Pesticide Flooded Application Model

(PFAM) Bias Factors for Water Monitoring Data
Formation/Decline Kinetics for

Degradates Formed in Parallel or in Sequence
Future Structure of the EMPM

Meeting—The EMPM has focused predominantly on water models. Is there interest in discussing other models? List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Exposure modeling, Public meeting. Dated: June 11, 2014. Donald J. Brady, Director, Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014–14833 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0396; FRL–9911–53]**

**Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened for Review and**  **Comment**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  With this document, EPA is opening the public comment period for several registration reviews. Registration review is EPA’s periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. Registration review dockets contain information that will assist the public in understanding the types of information and issues that the Agency may consider during the course of registration reviews. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the environment. This document also announces the Agency’s intent not to open a registration review docket for inorganic thiosulfate. This pesticide does not currently have any actively registered pesticide products and is not, therefore, scheduled for review under the registration review program. EPA is also announcing the availability of amended final work plan (FWP) for Meta-Cresol (Cresol) and Xylenol. Furthermore, this document also announces the registration review case closure for the pesticide 2- Mercaptobenzothiazole for non-payment of maintenance fees for the last remaining registration.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before August 25, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments identified by the docket identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the table in Unit III.A., by one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any


### 36057 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices

information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.

• Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/ dockets.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For pesticide specific information contact: The Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the table in Unit III.A.

For general information contact: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 308–8015; fax number: (703) 308–8005; email address: dumas.richard@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me?

This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human health, farmworker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments, remember
to:

i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes.

iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used.

v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced.

vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and suggest alternatives.

vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats.

viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified.

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, including minority and/or low income populations, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides discussed in this document, compared to the general population.
II. Authority

EPA is initiating its reviews of the pesticides identified in this document pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA section 3(c)(5). When used in accordance with widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the use of a pesticide in or on food.
III. Registration Reviews
A. What action is the Agency taking?

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide registrations identified in the table in this unit to assure that they continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard for registration—that is, they can still be used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. A pesticide’s registration review begins when the Agency establishes a docket for the pesticide’s registration review case and opens the docket for public review and comment. At present, EPA is opening registration review dockets for the cases identified in the following table.



### TABLE 

### 1—R EGISTRATION 

### R EVIEW 

### D OCKETS 

### O PENING

Registration review case name and No. Docket ID No. Chemical review manager or regulatory action leader, telephone no., email address

Benzisothiazolin-3-one (BIT) (Case 3026) EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0159 Donna Kamarei (703) 347–0443, kamarei.donna@epa.gov. Bispyribac-sodium (Case 7258) ............... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0074 Moana Appleyard (703) 308–8175, appleyard.moana@epa.gov. Imazamethabenz (Case 7207) ................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0395 Cathryn Britton (703) 308–0136, brittion.cathryn@epa.gov. Imazamox (Case 7238) ............................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0395 Kelly Ballard (703) 305–8126, ballard.kelly@epa.gov.


### 36058 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices

TABLE 

### 1—R EGISTRATION 

### R EVIEW 

### D OCKETS 

### O PENING

### —Continued

Registration review case name and No. Docket ID No. Chemical review manager or regulatory action leader, telephone no., email address

Imazapyr (Case 3078) ............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0200 Joel Wolf (703) 347–0228, wolf.joel@epa.gov. IR3535 (Case 6046) ................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0106 Clara Fuentes (703) 308–0171, fuentes.clara@epa.gov. Mecoprop (MCPP) (Case 0377) .............. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0361 Kaitlin Keller (703) 308–8172, keller.kaitlin@epa.gov. Mesotrione (Case 7256) .......................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0779 Jolene Trujillo (703) 347–0103, trujillo.jolene@epa.gov. Methylisothiazolinone (Case 3092) .......... EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0605 SanYvette Williams (703) 305–7702, williams.sanyvette@epa.gov. Octhilinone (OIT) (Case 2475) ................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0160 SanYvette Williams (703) 305–7702, williams.sanyvette@epa.gov. Propargite (Case 243) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0051 Wilhelmena Livingston (703) 308–8025, livingston. wilhelmena@epa.gov. Pyraclostrobin (Case 7034) ..................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0051 Matthew Manupella (703) 347–0411, manupella.matthew@epa.gov. Pyraflufen-ethyl (Case 7259) ................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0285 Steven Snyderman (703) 347–0249, snyderman.steven@epa.gov. Terrazole (formerly Etridiazole Terrazole)

(Case 9). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0414 Margaret Hathaway (703) 305–5076, hathaway.margaret@epa.gov.

Zinc pyrithione (formerly omadine salts)

(Case 2480). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0158 Sandra O’Neill (703) 347–0141, oneill.sandra@epa.gov.

Zoxamide (Case 7032) ............................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0391 Tanja Crk (703) 308–8202, crk.tanja@epa.gov.

EPA is also announcing that it will not be opening a docket for inorganic thiosulfate because this pesticide is not included in any products actively registered under FIFRA section 3. The Agency will take separate actions to cancel any remaining FIFRA section 24(c) Special Local Needs registrations with this active ingredient and to propose revocation of any affected tolerances that are not supported for import purposes only. EPA is announcing the availability of two amended FWPs for the registration review of the pesticide Cresol, docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0211 and Xylenol, docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2010–0240. These FWPs have been amended to incorporate revisions to the data requirements for registration review. Finally, EPA is announcing the registration review case closure for the pesticide 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole for non-payment of maintenance fees for last remaining registration.

B. Docket Content

1. Review dockets. The registration review dockets contain information that the Agency may consider in the course of the registration review. The Agency may include information from its files including, but not limited to, the following information:

• An overview of the registration review case status.

• A list of current product registrations and registrants.

• Federal Register notices regarding any pending registration actions.

• Federal Register notices regarding current or pending tolerances.

• Risk assessments.

• Bibliographies concerning current registrations.

• Summaries of incident data. • Any other pertinent data or information.

Each docket contains a document summarizing what the Agency currently knows about the pesticide case and a preliminary work plan for anticipated data and assessment needs. Additional documents provide more detailed information. During this public comment period, the Agency is asking that interested persons identify any additional information they believe the Agency should consider during the registration reviews of these pesticides. The Agency identifies in each docket the areas where public comment is specifically requested, though comment in any area is welcome.

2. Other related information. More information on these cases, including the active ingredients for each case, may be located in the registration review schedule on the Agency’s Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/ registration

_review/schedule.htm. Information on the Agency’s registration review program and its implementing regulation may be seen at http:// www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration

_ review.

3. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or information in response to this document. To be considered during a pesticide’s registration review, the submitted data or information must meet the following requirements:

• To ensure that EPA will consider data or information submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider data or information submitted at a later date.

• The data or information submitted must be presented in a legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or electronic form.

• Submitters must clearly identify the source of any submitted data or information.

• Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However, submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider the data or information in the pesticide’s registration review.

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions required in the final decision on the registration review case have been completed.
List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests, Benzisothiazolin-3-one, Bispyribac-sodium, Imazamethabenz, Imazamox, Imazapyr, IR3535, Mecoprop, Mesotrione, Methylisothiazolinone, Octhilinone,Propargite, Pyraclostrobin, Pyraflufenethyl, Terrazole, Zinc pyrithione (formerly omadine salts), and Zoxamide.

Dated: June 5, 2014. Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014–14685 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**


### 36059 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices

**FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD** 

**Notice of Meeting Schedule for 2015**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of Procedure, as amended in October, 2010, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) will meet on the following dates in room 7C13 of the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Building (441 G St. NW.) unless otherwise noted: —Wednesday and Thursday, February

25 and 26, 2015 —Wednesday and Thursday, April 29

and 30, 2015 —Wednesday and Thursday, June 24

and 25, 2015 —Wednesday and Thursday, August 26

and 27, 2015 —Wednesday and Thursday, October 21

and 22, 2015 —Wednesday and Thursday, December

16 and 17, 2015 The purpose of the meetings is to discuss issues related to:

—Leases —Public-Private Partnerships —Reporting Entity —Reporting Model —Risk Assumed, and —Any other topics as needed.

Any interested person may attend the meetings as an observer. Board discussion and reviews are open to the public. GAO Building security requires advance notice of your attendance. Please notify FASAB of your planned attendance by calling 202–512–7350 at least one day prior to the respective meeting.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at (202) 512–7350.

Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92–463.

Dated: June 20, 2014. Charles Jackson, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–14884 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 1610–02–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS**  **COMMISSION**

**[DA 14–808]**

**Freeze on the Filing of Applications for Digital Replacement Translator**  **Stations and Displacement Applications** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This document announces a freeze on the filing of displacement applications by Class A television, low power television and TV translator stations and on the filing of applications for digital replacement translators.

**DATES :**  This filing limitation become effective on June 11, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Shaun Maher, Video Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418–2324, Shaun.Maher@ fcc.gov

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Effective immediately, the Media Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission announces a freeze on the filing of applications for digital replacement translator (DRT) stations and displacement applications for low power television (LPTV), TV translator, and Class A television stations pursuant to §§ 73.3572(a)(4) and 74.787(a)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Because the digital transition was largely completed five years ago, in June 2009, and the Bureau issued a Freeze Public Notice on April 5, 2013, imposing limitations on the filing and processing of certain applications by full power and Class A television stations, there should be little occasion for new DRT and displacement applications to be filed. See Media Bureau Announces Limitations on the Filing and Processing of Full Power and Class A Television Station Modification Applications, Effective Immediately, and Reminds Stations of Spectrum Act Preservation Mandate, Public Notice, 28 FCC Rcd 4364. In addition, Class A television stations were subject to displacement only as the result of ‘‘engineering solutions’’ by full power stations to resolve ‘‘technical problems’’ in replicating and maximizing the full power station’s DTV service areas during the DTV transition. Consequently, the impact of this freeze on the LPTV, TV translator, and Class A services should be minimal.

The Commission recently adopted rules to implement the broadcast television spectrum incentive auction authorized by the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Public Law 112–96 Sections 6402, 6403, 126 Stat. 156 (2012). In conjunction with the incentive auction, the Commission has announced that it will conduct a ‘‘reverse auction’’ and reorganization or ‘‘repacking’’ of the broadcast television bands in order to free up a portion of the ultra high frequency (UHF) band for new flexible

uses. See In the Matter of Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive Auctions, MB Docket No. 12–268, Report and Order, FCC 14–50, released June 2, 2014. The facilities of DRT, LPTV, and TV translator stations will not be protected during repacking. Existing DRT, LPTV, and TV translator stations displaced by repacking will be permitted to file displacement applications in a special window to be opened following the completion of the auction.

To facilitate the special displacement window and to protect the opportunity for stations displaced by repacking of the television bands to obtain a new channel from the limited number of channels likely to be available for application after repacking, the Media Bureau deems it appropriate to freeze the acceptance of additional DRT and displacement applications at this time. The Media Bureau will continue to process pending DRT and displacement applications. Following the completion of the incentive auction, the Media Bureau will announce the dates and procedures for the special displacement window.

During the freeze, the Media Bureau will consider waiver requests by LPTV and TV translator stations that wish to submit a displacement application demonstrating that they are causing or receiving ‘‘new actual’’ interference to or from a full power television station. By ‘‘new’’ interference, we mean interference that is a result of the initiation of new or modified service by a full power station during the freeze. To qualify for the waiver, the displacement applicant must demonstrate either actual interference within the noise limited contour of the full power station or actual interference to the displacement applicant’s LPTV or TV translator station, either of which will result in the immediate loss of service to viewers, thus necessitating the grant of its application. Although the Commission is not accepting modification applications for changes to existing television service areas that would increase a full power station’s noise-limited contour or a Class A station’s protected contour in one or more directions beyond the area resulting from the station’s authorized facilities as of the April 5, 2013 freeze,