alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007056EN.01000901.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Denmark) — Criminal proceedings against Uwe Kay Festersen

(Case C-370/05) (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment - Free movement of capital - Articles 43 EC and 56 EC - Restrictions on the acquisition of agricultural property - Requirement that the acquirer take up fixed residence on the agricultural property)

(2007/C 56/14)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Party to the main criminal proceedings

Uwe Kay Festersen

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Vestre Landsret — Interpretation of Articles 43 EC and 56 EC — National legislation under which the acquisition of an agricultural holding is conditional on taking up residence there

Operative part of the judgment

| 1) | Article 56 EC precludes national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings from laying down as a condition for acquiring an agricultural property the requirement that the acquirer take up fixed residence on that property. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Article 56 EC precludes national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings from laying down as a condition for acquiring an agricultural property the requirement that the acquirer take up fixed residence on that property.

| 2) | That interpretation of Article 56 EC would not be different where the agricultural property acquired did not constitute a viable farm and the residential building was situated in an urban zone. |
| --- | --- |

2)

That interpretation of Article 56 EC would not be different where the agricultural property acquired did not constitute a viable farm and the residential building was situated in an urban zone.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 10.12.2005.

1

---
|   | 1. | Lexicon’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lexicon. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Arthur T. Sands                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Arthur T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.          |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

| By:    | /s/ Jeffrey L. Wade                                                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jeffrey L. Wade                                                            |
|   | Executive Vice President, Corporate Developmentand Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 13.1
 GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B.
 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    The Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, to
which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ Emilio Azcárraga Jean

Name: Emilio Azcárraga JeanTitle:   Chairman of the Board, President
            and Chief Executive Officer
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Civil Rights 

# In This Section

                      -  Employee Services                          -  Overview 
                        -  Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) 
                        -  Minority Serving Institutions Program 
                        -  No FEAR Act 
                        -  Special Emphasis Programs 
                      -  Public Services                          -  Overview 
                        -  Small Business Utilization in Federal Projects 
                        -  Environmental Justice 
                        -  Limited English Proficiency 
                      -  Grant Recipient Information 
                      -  PHMSA Office of Civil Rights 

## Related Links

                  -                                          White House Initiatives for Asian Americans                   
                  -                                          Historical Black Colleges/Universities                   
                  -                                          White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges/Universities                    

## Contact Us

Office of Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.civilrights@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-9638****Fax:**202-366-0506**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Minority Serving Institutions

The PHMSA Office of Civil Rights develops and implements White House educational initiatives with Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, Tribal Colleges and Universities, and institutions that serve Asian Americans and Native American Pacific Islanders and persons with disabilities.

PHMSA participates with the Department on Student Summer Internship Programs in support of the Department's efforts to enhance and facilitate the development of a highly qualified and diverse transportation workforce for the 21st century. Information on the Student Transportation Internship Program for Diverse Groups can be found here.
§ 543.14 What are the minimum internal control standards for patron deposit accounts and cashless systems? ( a ) *Supervision.* Supervision must be provided as needed for patron deposit accounts and cashless systems by an agent(s) with authority equal to or greater than those being supervised.
( b ) *Patron deposit accounts and cashless systems.* ( 1 ) Smart cards cannot maintain the only source of account data.
( 2 ) *Establishment of patron deposit accounts.* The following standards apply when a patron establishes an account. ( i ) The patron must appear at the gaming operation in person, at a designated area of accountability, and present valid government issued picture identification; and
( ii ) An agent must examine the patron's identification and record the following information: ( A ) Type, number, and expiration date of the identification;
( B ) Patron's name;
( C ) A unique account identifier;
( D ) Date the account was opened; and
( E ) The agent's name.
( 3 ) The patron must sign the account documentation before the agent may activate the account.
( 4 ) The agent or cashless system must provide the patron deposit account holder with a secure method of access.
( c ) *Patron deposits, withdrawals and adjustments.* ( 1 ) Prior to the patron making a deposit or withdrawal from a patron deposit account, the agent or cashless system must verify the patron deposit account, the patron identity, and availability of funds. A personal identification number (PIN) is an acceptable form of verifying identification.
( 2 ) Adjustments made to the patron deposit accounts must be performed by an agent.
( 3 ) When a deposit, withdrawal, or adjustment is processed by an agent, a transaction record must be created containing the following information: ( i ) Same document number on all copies;
( ii ) Type of transaction, (deposit, withdrawal, or adjustment);
( iii ) Name or other identifier of the patron;
( iv ) The unique account identifier;
( v ) Patron signature for withdrawals, unless a secured method of access is utilized;
( vi ) For adjustments to the account, the reason for the adjustment;
( vii ) Date and time of transaction;
( viii ) Amount of transaction;
( ix ) Nature of deposit, withdrawal, or adjustment (cash, check, chips); and
( x ) Signature of the agent processing the transaction.
( 4 ) When a patron deposits or withdraws funds from a patron deposit account electronically, the following must be recorded: ( i ) Date and time of transaction;
( ii ) Location (player interface, kiosk);
( iii ) Type of transaction (deposit, withdrawal);
( iv ) Amount of transaction; and
( v ) The unique account identifier.
( 5 ) Patron deposit account transaction records must be available to the patron upon reasonable request.
( 6 ) If electronic funds transfers are made to or from a gaming operation bank account for patron deposit account funds, the bank account must be dedicated and may not be used for any other types of transactions.
( d ) *Variances.* The operation must establish, as approved by the TGRA, the threshold level at which a variance must be reviewed to determine the cause. Any such review must be documented.
§ 290.2 Definitions. *Appropriate Bureau official* (ABO) means the Bureau official with delegated authority to approve tribal revenue allocation plans.
*IGRA* means the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-497) 102 Stat. 2467 dated October 17, 1988, (Codified at 25 U.S.C. 2701-2721(1988)) and any amendments.
*Indian Tribe* means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community of Indians that the Secretary recognizes as: ( 1 ) Eligible for the speci al programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians; and
( 2 ) Having powers of self-government.
*Legal incompetent* means an individual who is eligible to participate in a per capita payment and who has been declared to be under a legal disability, other than being a minor, by a court of competent jurisdiction, including tribal justice systems or as established by the tribe.
*Member of an Indian tribe* means an individual who meets the requirements established by applicable tribal law for enrollment in the tribe and— ( 1 ) Is listed on the tribal rolls of that tribe if such rolls are kept or
( 2 ) Is recognized as a member by the tribal governing body if tribal rolls are not kept.
*Minor* means an individual who is eligible to participate in a per capita payment and who has not reached the age of 18 years.
*Per capita payment* means the distribution of money or other thing of value to all members of the tribe, or to identified groups of members, which is paid directly from the net revenues of any tribal gaming activity. This definition does not apply to payments which have been set aside by the tribe for special purposes or programs, such as payments made for social welfare, medical assistance, education, housing or other similar, specifically identified needs.
*Resolution* means the formal document in which the tribal governing body expresses its legislative will in accordance with applicable tribal law.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of the Interior or his/her authorized representative.
*Superintendent* means the official or other designated representative of the BIA in charge of the field office which has immediate administrative responsibility for the affairs of the tribe for which a tribal revenue allocation plan is prepared.
*Tribal governing body* means the governing body of an Indian tribe recognized by the Secretary.
Tribal revenue allocation plan or allocation plan means the document submitted by an Indian tribe that provides for distributing net gaming revenues.
*You or your* means the Indian tribe.
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          DOT FRP-1 Standard, Basic Requirements For Fiber Reinforced Plastic Type 3FC Co...                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          DOT FRP-1 Standard, Basic Requirements For Fiber Reinforced Plastic Type 3FC Composite Cylinders PDF                   

# DOT FRP-1 Standard, Basic Requirements For Fiber Reinforced Plastic Type 3FC Composite Cylinders

This is the basis requirements (standard) by OHM for design, construction and manufacturing fully wrapped Fiber Reinforced Plastic Type 3FC Composite Cylinders (FRP-1).

**Key Words**: composite cylinder, E glass, S glass, cycling, fiber stress, aluminum liner, full wrapped

----

If you have any **technical questions** not addressed by this or associated documents, contact Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.
Exhibit 23.1



            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Glimcher Realty Trust
Columbus, Ohio

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-69740, 333-87538, 333-113910, 33-90730, 33-91084,
333-43317, 333-43319 and 333-61339) and Form S-8 (No. 33-94542, 333-10221 and
333-84537) of Glimcher Realty Trust of our reports dated February 21, 2005
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, and the effectiveness of Glimcher Realty Trust's internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



BDO Seidman, LLP
Chicago, Illinois


March 10, 2005
# C_2007054EN.01000102.xml

| 9.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4515 — CSN/CORUS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 54/02)

On 29 January 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4515. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4515. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### Edmond L. Abel et al. *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Norwalk et al.

*jRobert M. McAnerney,*in support of the petition.

*Eugene M. Kimmel*and *Jackie Chan,*in opposition.

Submitted June 11

decided June 25, 1974

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2001, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), We, Thomas J. Howells, President and Travis Jenson, Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Thomas J. Howells
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Thomas J. Howells
                                         President and director


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Travis Jenson
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Travis Jenson
                                         Secretary and director
### §3336. Procedures for establishing appraisal standards and requiring use of certified and licensed appraisers

Appraisal standards and requirements for using State certified and licensed appraisers in federally related transactions pursuant to this chapter shall be prescribed in accordance with procedures set forth in section 553 of title 5, including the publication of notice and receipt of written comments or the holding of public hearings with respect to any standards or requirements proposed to be established.

(Pub. L. 101–73, title XI, §1107, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 513.)
Exhibit 13.1
 
 Certification
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Cencosud S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 of the Company (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jaime SolerName:
Jaime SolerTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
April 14, 2016/s/ Rodrigo LarrainName:
Rodrigo LarrainTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
April 14, 2016
s^ FLYING SERVICE 

May 26, 2010 

<:~> 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 ^.^ 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 ?5 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 -

In the Matter of Central Flying Service, Inc. 

Docket No. CPlOSWOOOl 

FAA EIR No. 2009SW110011 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0016 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Because Central Flying Service, Inc. and the FAA have reached a settlement in 

the above referenced matter. Central Flying Service, Inc. is hereby ^withdrawing its 

request for a Hearing. 

Sincerely, 

CENTRAL FLYING SERVICE, INC. 

'4U_4-MuJr 

Richard N. Holbert 

President 

1501 Bond Street • Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 • 501-375-3245 • Fax 501-375-7274 
^ • ' 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that an original and a copy of the foregoing letter withdrawing Central's 

request for a Hearing have been mailed this date, to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

And a copy of the letter has been mailed by to: 

Stellamaris Williams, Esq. 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Southwest Region 

2601 MeachamBlvd 

Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Bldg Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

X L ^ ^sLur^^jr^ 

Richard N. Holbert 

President 

Central Flying Service, Inc. 

1501 Bond Avenue 

Little Rock, Arkansas 72202
# C_2007042EN.01000202.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 January 2007 — Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v Commission of the European Communities, Schott AG (formerly Schott Glas)

(Case C-404/04 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Article 87(1) EC - Contractual promise of payment - Disappearance of an essential condition of the contract - New pleas and arguments - Substitution of reasons - Application for the hearing of witnesses - Test of a private creditor - Grounds of the judgment of the Court of First Instance - Determination of the amount of aid - Article 87(3)(c) EC - Right to be heard - Breach, in respect of the Member State concerned, of the rights of the defence)

(2007/C 42/03)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH (represented by: C. Arhold and N. Wimmer, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci and V. Kreuschitz, Agents), Schott AG (formerly Schott Glas) (represented by: U. Soltész, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2004 in Case T-198/01 Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau v Commission dismissing the action for annulment of Commission Decision 2002/185/EC of 12 June 2001 on State aid implemented by Germany for Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH (Germany) (OJ 2002 L 62, p 30)

Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay the total costs of the Commission of the European Communities related to the interlocutory proceedings and to these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay the total costs of the Commission of the European Communities related to the interlocutory proceedings and to these proceedings.

| 3. | Orders Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH to pay the costs incurred by Schott AG in the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH to pay the costs incurred by Schott AG in the interlocutory proceedings.

| 4. | Orders Schott AG to bear its own costs related to these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Schott AG to bear its own costs related to these proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 6.11.2004.

1

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 26, 

2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00110-CV

DEMETRIOS (JIM) ALEXOPOULOS AND PANGIOTA MITSAKOS, COADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF THEODORE MITSAKOS, 

Appellants

V.

JOSEPH M. PHILLIPS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1034982

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 29, 2013. On June 17, 

2014, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.