I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311 (b) to the extent required for Brendan McGinnis to be able to use an FAA Approved Chil d Restraint System even though he exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted , I request that any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Brendan is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Brendan to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system during use of that child restraint system aboard an aircraft.

I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relief is Section 121.311 Seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses.

My son i s 9 year’s old, weighs 76 pounds, and is 55 inches tall. My son ’s p hysical condition is as follows: Severe cerebral palsy, non

- verbal, epilepsy, feeding tube/G

- button, non

- ambulatory. As a result of his physical condition, he needs the support and securit y provided by an FAA Approved C hild Restraint, but because of his weight is incapable of compliance with the regulation. I am also submitting the following contact information: Tracy McGinnis (mother), address: 5664 Kipling Parkway, Apt. 8

- 102, Arvada, Co lorado 80002. Email: tbdmcginnis@gmail.com

I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger by ensuring that they are securely restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the airplane by being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions.

I propose that Brendan be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though he e xceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensu res a high level of safety for Brendan and a high level of safety for the other passengers and cre w on the airplane. In fact, in Brendan ’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire flight.

Enhancing safety for Brendan is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by the fact that the use of this FAA Appro ved Child Restraint System allows him to use commercial air transportation. Without the support and security of the FAA Ap proved Child Restraint System, he would be unable to fly commercially.

I also believe that, with certain limitations established by th e FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES re straint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrity if used by someone who weighed several hundred pounds.

I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of t he child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this might cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving for ward more quickly would mean that it would not bethere to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restraint).

In order to achieve an equivalent level of safety as that provided by the affected regulation , I propose that the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Brendan only sits in a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist for a passenger seated behind Brendan while he is using t he CARES restraint. I also propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of Brendan's parents or a caregiver accompanying him or he r. In addition, I propose that Brendan's parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exem ption.

I also request that the processing of this petition not be delayed for publication and comment in the Federal Re gister. We want to travel March 2014 . If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may not be able to travel in this timeframe.

If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following:

This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint Syst em on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System, this child would be unable to fly. We request that this child be allow ed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though ( she/he ) exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this child is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security tha t the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide for ( her/him ) during the flight.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.