12732 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices 

e-mail address: 

williams.melina@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Additional Information About the 

Proposed Consent Decree 

This proposed consent decree would 

resolve a lawsuit alleging that the 

Administrator failed to perform a 

nondiscretionary duty to grant or deny, 

within 60 days of submission, an 

administrative petition to object to a 

CAA Title V permit issued by the New 

Mexico Environment Department, Air 

Quality Bureau to Williams Four 

Corners LLC for the Sims Mesa Central 

Delivery Point facility. Under the terms 

of the proposed consent decree, EPA has 

agreed to respond to the petition by 

April 29, 2011, or within 30 days of the 

entry date of this Consent Decree, 

whichever is later. The proposed 

consent decree further states that EPA 

shall expeditiously deliver notice of 

such action on the permit to the Office 

of the Federal Register for publication. 

In addition, the proposed consent 

decree states that deadline for filing a 

motion for costs of litigation (including 

attorneys’ fees) is extended until 60 

days after the decree is entered by the 

court, that the parties shall seek to 

resolve informally any claim for such 

costs during those 60 days, and that if 

they cannot they will submit the issue 

to the court for resolution. The proposed 

consent decree also states that, after 

EPA fulfills its obligations under the 

decree and the plaintiff’s claims for 

costs of litigation have been resolved as 

provided in the decree, the case shall be 

dismissed with prejudice. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, the Agency will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

consent decree from persons who were 

not named as parties or intervenors to 

the litigation in question. EPA or the 

Department of Justice may withdraw or 

withhold consent to the proposed 

consent decree if the comments disclose 

facts or considerations that indicate that 

such consent is inappropriate, 

improper, inadequate, or inconsistent 

with the requirements of the Act. Unless 

EPA or the Department of Justice 

determines that consent to this consent 

decree should be withdrawn, the terms 

of the decree will be affirmed. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed Consent 

Decree 

A. How can I get a copy of the consent 

decree? 

The official public docket for this 

action (identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OGC–2011–0212) contains a 

copy of the proposed consent decree. 

The official public docket is available 

for public viewing at the Office of 

Environmental Information (OEI) Docket 

in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., 

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OEI 

Docket is (202) 566–1752. 

An electronic version of the public 

docket is available through http:// 

www.regulations.gov. You may use the 

http://www.regulations.gov to submit or 

view public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the official 

public docket, and to access those 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. Once in the 

system, key in the appropriate docket 

identification number then select 

‘‘search’’. 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov without change, 

unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, CBI, or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information 

claimed as CBI and other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute 

is not included in the official public 

docket or in the electronic public 

docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted 

material, including copyrighted material 

contained in a public comment, will not 

be placed in EPA’s electronic public 

docket but will be available only in 

printed, paper form in the official public 

docket. Although not all docket 

materials may be available 

electronically, you may still access any 

of the publicly available docket 

materials through the EPA Docket 

Center. 

B. How and to whom do I submit 

comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an e-mail 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the http://www.regulations.gov 

Web site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, e-mail address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (e-mail) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an e-mail comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through http://www.regulations.gov, 

your e-mail address is automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the official 

public docket, and made available in 

EPA’s electronic public docket. 

Dated: March 1, 2011. 

Richard B. Ossias, 

Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5200 Filed 3–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9277–5] 

Science Advisory Board Staff Office; 

Notification of a Public Teleconference 

of the Air Monitoring and Methods 

Subcommittee 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA or Agency) Science 

Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office 

announces a public teleconference of 

the Clean Air Scientific Advisory 

Committee (CASAC) Air Monitoring and 

Methods Subcommittee (AMMS) to 

discuss the AMMS draft report on EPA’s 

draft monitoring documents for Oxides 

of Nitrogen (NOX) and Sulfur (SOx). 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices 12733 

DATES: A public teleconference will be 

held on Tuesday, March 29, 2011 from 

1 p.m. to 3 p.m. (Eastern Time). 

ADDRESSES: The public teleconference 

will be conducted by telephone only. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any 

member of the public wishing further 

information regarding this Notice and 

public teleconference may contact 

Mr. Edward Hanlon, Designated 

Federal Officer (DFO), SAB Staff Office, 

by telephone/voice mail at (202) 564– 

2134; by fax at (202) 565–2098 or via email at hanlon.edward@epa.gov. 

General information concerning the EPA 

CASAC can be found at the EPA CASAC 

Web site at http://www.epa.gov/casac. 

Any inquiry regarding EPA’s draft 

monitoring documents for NOX and SOX

should be directed to Dr. Richard 

Scheffe, EPA Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards (OAQPS), at 

scheffe.rich@epa.gov or 919–541–4650. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: The CASAC was 

established pursuant to the under the 

Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 

1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409D(d)(2), 

to provide advice, information, and 

recommendations to the Administrator 

on the scientific and technical aspects of 

issues related to the criteria for air 

quality standards, research related to air 

quality, sources of air pollution, and the 

strategies to attain and maintain air 

quality standards and to prevent 

significant deterioration of air quality. 

The CASAC is a Federal Advisory 

Committee chartered under the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 

U.S.C., App. 2. Pursuant to FACA and 

EPA policy, notice is hereby given that 

the CASAC AMMS CASAC AMMS will 

hold a public teleconference to discuss 

the Subcommittee’s draft peer review 

report of the EPA’s draft monitoring 

documents for NOX and SOX. 

The AMMS met on February 16, 2011 

to review EPA’s draft monitoring 

documents for NOX and SOX and 

proposed methods for assessing levels of 

nitrogen and sulfur deposition. [Federal 

Register Notice dated January 25, 2011 

(76 FR 4346)]. Materials from the 

February 2011 meeting are posted on 

the SAB Web site at http:// 

yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/

bf498bd32a1c7fdf85257242006dd6cb/ 

eea38cc34cc1f86f8525781d005

866e6!OpenDocument&Date=2011-02- 

16. The purpose of the March 29, 2011 

teleconference call is for the AMMS to 

discuss its draft peer review report. 

Availability of Meeting Materials: The 

agenda and materials in support of this 

teleconference call will be placed on the 

EPA CASAC Web site at http:// 

www.epa.gov/casac in advance of the 

teleconference call. 

Procedures for Providing Public Input: 

Interested members of the public may 

submit relevant written or oral 

information on the topic of this advisory 

activity for the CASAC to consider 

during the advisory process. Oral 

Statements: In general, individuals or 

groups requesting an oral presentation 

at this public teleconference will be 

limited to three minutes per speaker. 

Interested parties should contact Mr. 

Edward Hanlon, DFO, in writing 

(preferably via e-mail), at the contact 

information noted above, by March 22, 

2011 to be placed on the list of public 

speakers for the teleconference. Written 

Statements: Written statements should 

be received in the SAB Staff Office by 

March 22, 2011 so that the information 

may be made available to the CASAC 

AMMS for their consideration. Written 

statements should be supplied to the 

DFO in the following formats: one hard 

copy with original signature, and one 

electronic copy via e-mail (acceptable 

file format: Adobe Acrobat PDF, 

WordPerfect, MS Word, MS PowerPoint, 

or Rich Text files in IBM–PC/Windows 

98/2000/XP format). Submitters are 

requested to provide two versions of 

each document submitted with and 

without signatures, because the SAB 

Staff Office does not publish documents 

with signatures on its Web sites. 

Accessibility: For information on 

access or services for individuals with 

disabilities, please contact Mr. Edward 

Hanlon at the phone number or e-mail 

address noted above, preferably at least 

ten days prior to the meeting, to give 

EPA as much time as possible to process 

your request. 

Dated: March 2, 2011. 

Anthony F. Maciorowski, 

Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board 

Staff Office. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5202 Filed 3–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal 

Employment Opportunity Commission. 

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, March 15, 

2011, 1 p.m. Eastern Time. 

PLACE: Commission Meeting Room on 

the First Floor of the EEOC Office 

Building, 131 ‘‘M’’ Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20507. 

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the 

public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session 

1. Announcement of Notation Votes, 

and 

2. Employment of People with Mental 

Disabilities. 

Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, 

the meeting will be open to public 

observation of the Commission’s 

deliberations and voting. Seating is limited 

and it is suggested that visitors arrive 30 

minutes before the meeting in order to be 

processed through security and escorted to 

the meeting room. (In addition to publishing 

notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the 

Federal Register, the Commission also 

provides information about Commission 

meetings on its Web site, http:// 

www.eeoc.gov., and provides a recorded 

announcement a week in advance on future 

Commission sessions.) 

Please telephone (202) 663–7100 

(voice) and (202) 663–4074 (TTY) at any 

time for information on these meetings. 

The EEOC provides sign language 

interpretation and Communication 

Access Realtime Translation (CART) 

services at Commission meetings for 

individuals who are deaf or hard of 

hearing. Requests for other reasonable 

accommodations may be made by using 

the voice and TTY numbers listed 

above. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on 

(202) 663–4070. 

Dated: March 4, 2011. 

Stephen Llewellyn, 

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5361 Filed 3–4–11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6570–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[EB Docket No. 10–247; DA 11–246] 

Shenzhen Tangreat Technology Co., 

Ltd., Grantee of Equipment 

Authorization FCC ID No. XRLTG– 

VIPJAMM 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This document commences a 

hearing proceeding by directing 

Shenzhen Tangreat Technology Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Shenzhen’’), Grantee of Equipment 

Authorization FCC ID No. XRLTG– 

VIPJAMM, to show cause why the 

equipment authorization FCC ID No. 

XRLTG–VIPJAMM should not be 

revoked and why a Forfeiture Order in 

an amount not to exceed one hundred 

and twelve thousand five hundred 

dollars ($112,500) should not be issued 

against Shenzhen for apparent false 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES