Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 2829 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 

1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Amend 33 CFR 165.921 by staying 

paragraphs (d)–(h) from midnight 

January 15, 2011 to midnight January 

15, 2013. 

Dated: January 7, 2011. 

Michael N. Parks, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

Ninth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2011–852 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–1138] 

Safety Zone, Brandon Road Lock and 

Dam to Lake Michigan Including Des 

Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and 

Ship Canal, Chicago River, and 

Calumet-Saganashkee Channel, 

Chicago, IL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of Enforcement of 

Regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

a segment of the Safety Zone; Brandon 

Road Lock and Dam to Lake Michigan 

including Des Plaines River, Chicago 

Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago River, 

Calumet-Saganashkee Channel on all 

waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship 

Canal from Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile 

Marker 296.7 daily from 7 a.m. through 

11 a.m. and from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on 

January 18–22, 2011; January 24–26, 

2011; January 31, 2011; February 1–5, 

2011; February 7–12, 2011; and on 

February 14–19, 2011. This enforcement 

action will also occur from 7 a.m. on 

January 27, 2011 through 7 a.m. on 

January 29, 2011. This action is 

necessary to protect the waterways, 

waterway users, and vessels from 

hazards associated with the U.S. Army 

Corps of Engineers’ operational and 

safety testing of the dispersal barrier IIB, 

which helps control the spread of 

aquatic nuisance species that have the 

potential of devastating the waters of the 

Great Lakes. 

During the enforcement period, entry 

into, transiting, mooring, laying-up or 

anchoring within the enforced area of 

this safety zone by any person or vessel 

is prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port, Sector Lake 

Michigan, or his or her designated 

representative. 

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 

165.T09.0166 will be enforced from 

7 a.m. on January 18, 2011 through 

5 p.m. on February 19, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice, call 

or e-mail CDR Tim Cummins, Deputy 

Prevention Division, Ninth Coast Guard 

District, telephone 216–902–6045, email address 

Timothy.M.Cummins@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce a segment of the 

Safety Zone; Brandon Road Lock and 

Dam to Lake Michigan including Des 

Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and 

Ship Canal, Chicago River, CalumetSaganashkee Channel, Chicago, IL, 

listed in 33 CFR § 165.T09–0166, on all 

waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship 

Canal from Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile 

Marker 296.7 daily from 7 a.m. to 

11 a.m. and from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on 

January 18–22, 2011; January 24–26, 

2011; January 31, 2011; February 1–5, 

2011; February 7–12, 2011; and on 

February 14–19, 2011. This enforcement 

action will also occur from 7 a.m. on 

January 27, 2011 until 7 a.m. on January 

29, 2011. 

This enforcement action is necessary 

because the Captain of the Port, Sector 

Lake Michigan has determined that the 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ dispersal 

barrier IIB operational testing poses 

risks to life and property. The 

combination of vessel traffic and electric 

current in the water makes the 

controlling of vessels through the 

impacted portion of the Chicago 

Sanitary and Ship Canal necessary to 

prevent injury and property loss. 

In accordance with the general 

regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry 

into, transiting, mooring, laying up or 

anchoring within the enforced area of 

this safety zone by any person or vessel 

is prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port, Sector Lake 

Michigan, or his or her designated 

representative. 

This notice is issued under authority 

of 33 CFR 165.T09–0166 and 5 U.S.C. 

552(a). In addition to this notice in the 

Federal Register, the Captain of the 

Port, Sector Lake Michigan, will also 

provide notice through other means, 

which may include, but are not limited 

to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local 

Notice to Mariners, local news media, 

distribution in leaflet form, and onscene oral notice. Additionally, the 

Captain of the Port, Sector Lake 

Michigan, may notify representatives 

from the maritime industry through 

telephonic and e-mail notifications. 

Dated: December 29, 2010. 

S.R. Schenk, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of 

the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, Acting. 

[FR Doc. 2011–851 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0881; FRL–9251–9] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; 

Adoption of 8-hour Ozone Standard 

and Related Reference Conditions, and 

Update of Appendices 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve a revision to the 

Commonwealth of Virginia State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision 

adds the 2008 8-hour ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) 

of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) and 

related reference conditions and 

updates the list of appendices under 

‘‘Documents Incorporated by Reference.’’ 

Virginia’s SIP revision for the NAAQS 

for ozone is consistent with the 8-hour 

Federal standard. This action is being 

taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This rule is effective on March 

21, 2011 without further notice, unless 

EPA receives adverse written comment 

by February 17, 2011. If EPA receives 

such comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2010–0881 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. E-mail: powers.marilyn@epa.gov. 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0881, 

Marilyn Powers, Acting Associate 

Director, Office of Air Program 

Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES

2830 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2010– 

0881. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at http://www.

regulations.gov, including any personal 

information provided, unless the 

comment includes information claimed 

to be Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. Do 

not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http://www.

regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http://

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http://www.

regulations.gov or in hard copy during 

normal business hours at the Air 

Protection Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103. Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality, 629 East Main 

Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by 

e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On September 27, 2010, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a 

formal revision to its SIP. The SIP 

revision amends the existing SIP to add 

the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and 

related reference conditions. 

The Clean Air Act (CAA) specifies 

that EPA must reevaluate the 

appropriateness of each of the NAAQS 

every five years. As part of the process, 

EPA reviewed the latest health-based 

research and determined that a revised 

NAAQS for ozone was necessary to 

protect public health. EPA revised the 8- 

hour standard to a level of 0.075 parts 

per million (ppm) to provide increased 

protection for children and other ‘‘at 

risk’’ populations against an array of 

ozone-related adverse health effects. 

EPA promulgated this more stringent 

NAAQS for ozone on March 27, 2008 

(73 FR 16436). 

II. Summary of SIP Revision 

On September 27, 2010, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a 

formal revision to its SIP. The SIP 

revision consists of an amendment 

which includes the revised ambient air 

quality standard for ozone, and related 

reference conditions. Virginia’s revision 

incorporates the Federal 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS into the Code of Virginia 

(9VAC5 Chapter 30). In addition, the list 

of appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 is being 

updated under documents incorporated 

by reference (9VAC5–20–21). 

The following are the specific sections 

that are being modified or added: 

• 9VAC5–20–21: Documents 

incorporated by reference (modified). 

• 9VAC5–30–55: Ozone (8-hour, 0.08 

ppm) (modified). 

• 9VAC5–30–56: Ozone (8-hour, 

0.075 ppm) (added). 

III. General Information Pertaining to 

SIP Submittals From the 

Commonwealth of Virginia 

In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation 

that provides for, subject to certain 

conditions, an environmental 

assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for 

voluntary compliance evaluations 

performed by a regulated entity. The 

legislation further addresses the relative 

burden of proof for parties either 

asserting the privilege or seeking 

disclosure of documents for which the 

privilege is claimed. Virginia’s 

legislation also provides, subject to 

certain conditions, for a penalty waiver 

for violations of environmental laws 

when a regulated entity discovers such 

violations pursuant to a voluntary 

compliance evaluation and voluntarily 

discloses such violations to the 

Commonwealth and takes prompt and 

appropriate measures to remedy the 

violations. Virginia’s Voluntary 

Environmental Assessment Privilege 

Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides 

a privilege that protects from disclosure 

documents and information about the 

content of those documents that are the 

product of a voluntary environmental 

assessment. The Privilege Law does not 

extend to documents or information (1) 

that are generated or developed before 

the commencement of a voluntary 

environmental assessment; (2) that are 

prepared independently of the 

assessment process; (3) that demonstrate 

a clear, imminent and substantial 

danger to the public health or 

environment; or (4) that are required by 

law. 

On January 12, 1998, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the 

Attorney General provided a legal 

opinion that states that the Privilege 

Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, 

precludes granting a privilege to 

documents and information ‘‘required 

by law,’’ including documents and 

information ‘‘required by Federal law to 

maintain program delegation, 

authorization or approval,’’ since 

Virginia must ‘‘enforce Federally 

authorized environmental programs in a 

manner that is no less stringent than 

their Federal counterparts. * * *’’ The 

opinion concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding 

§ 10.1–1198, therefore, documents or 

other information needed for civil or 

criminal enforcement under one of these 

programs could not be privileged 

because such documents and 

information are essential to pursuing 

enforcement in a manner required by 

Federal law to maintain program 

delegation, authorization or approval.’’ 

Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code 

Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the 

extent consistent with requirements 

imposed by Federal law,’’ any person 

making a voluntary disclosure of 

information to a State agency regarding 

a violation of an environmental statute, 

regulation, permit, or administrative 

order is granted immunity from 

administrative or civil penalty. The 

Attorney General’s January 12, 1998 

opinion states that the quoted language 

renders this statute inapplicable to 

enforcement of any Federally authorized 

programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be 

afforded from administrative, civil, or 

criminal penalties because granting 

such immunity would not be consistent 

WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 2831 

with Federal law, which is one of the 

criteria for immunity.’’ 

Therefore, EPA has determined that 

Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity 

statutes will not preclude the 

Commonwealth from enforcing its 

program consistent with the Federal 

requirements. In any event, because 

EPA has also determined that a State 

audit privilege and immunity law can 

affect only State enforcement and 

cannot have any impact on Federal 

enforcement authorities, EPA may at 

any time invoke its authority under the 

CAA, including, for example, sections 

113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the 

requirements or prohibitions of the State 

plan, independently of any State 

enforcement effort. In addition, citizen 

enforcement under section 304 of the 

CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or 

any, State audit privilege or immunity 

law. 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is approving Virginia’s SIP 

revisions for the 2008 ozone NAAQS 

and related reference conditions, as well 

as the updated list of appendices to 40 

CFR part 51 under ‘‘Documents 

Incorporated by Reference.’’ EPA is 

publishing this rule without prior 

proposal because the Agency views this 

as a noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipates no adverse comment. 

However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ 

section of today’s Federal Register, EPA 

is publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

SIP revision if adverse comments are 

filed. This rule will be effective on 

March 21, 2011 without further notice 

unless EPA receives adverse comment 

by February 17, 2011. If EPA receives 

adverse comment, EPA will publish a 

timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. EPA will 

address all public comments in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

must do so at this time. Please note that 

if EPA receives adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

Tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on Tribal governments or preempt 

Tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by March 21, 2011. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action 

pertaining to Virginia’s adoption of the 

2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.075 

parts per million (ppm) and related 

reference conditions may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: December 22, 2010. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES

2832 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 40 CFR 

part 52 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart VV—Virginia 

■ 2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entry for 

Section 5–30–55 and by adding the 

entry for Section 5–30–56. The table in 

paragraph (e) is amended by adding an 

entry for ‘‘Documents Incorporated by 

Reference’’ after the ninth existing entry 

for ‘‘Documents Incorporated by 

Reference.’’ The amendments read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2420 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES

State citation Title/subject State effective date EPA approval date 

Explanation 

[former SIP 

citation] 

*******

9 VAC 5, Chapter 30 Ambient Air Quality Standards [Part III] 

*******

5–30–55 ............................ Ozone (8-hour, 0.08 ppm) ......................................... 6/24/09 1/18/11 [Insert page number where the document begins].Revised section. 

5–30–56 ............................ Ozone (8-hour, 0.075 ppm) ....................................... 6/24/09 1/18/11 [Insert page number where the document begins].Added section. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

Name of non-regulatory SIP revision Applicable geographic 

area 

State submittal date EPA approval date Additional 

explanation 

*******

Documents Incorporated by Reference (9 VAC 5– 

20–21, Sections B and E.1.).

Statewide ........................ 9/27/10 1/18/11 [Insert page number where the document begins].Revised sections. 

*******

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–487 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 60 and 63 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–0051; EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2007–0877; FRL–9253–4] 

RIN 2060–AQ59 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants From the 

Portland Cement Manufacturing 

Industry and Standards of 

Performance for Portland Cement 

Plants 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct Final rule; amendments. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is taking direct final 

action on amendments to the National 

Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants (NESHAP) from the Portland 

Cement Manufacturing Industry and 

Standards of Performance (NSPS) for 

Portland Cement Plants. The final rules 

were published on September 9, 2010. 

This direct final action amends certain 

regulatory text to clarify compliance 

dates and clarifies that the previously 

issued emission limits that were 

changed in the September 9, 2010, 

action remain in effect until sources are 

required to comply with the revised 

limits. We are also correcting two minor 

typographical errors in the regulatory 

text to the September 9, 2010 action. 

DATES: The direct final rule is effective 

on March 21, 2011, without further 

notice, unless EPA receives significant 

adverse written comment by February 

17, 2011, or if a public hearing is 

requested by February 2, 2011. If 

significant adverse comments are 

received, EPA will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

clarifying which provisions will become 

effective and which provisions are being 

withdrawn due to adverse comment. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2002–0051, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (202) 566–9744. 

• Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send 

comments to: EPA Docket Center 

(6102T), National Emission Standards 

for Hazardous Air Pollutant From the 

Portland Cement Manufacturing 

Industry Docket, Docket ID No. EPA– 

HQ–OAR–2002–0051, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460. Please include a total of two 

WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES