alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 10 2012

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

To Whom It May Concern:

Please accept this letter as an exemption request from the requirement for a separate testing 

program for our part 91.147 commercial air tour operation.

Per the exemption instructions the following information is being provided:

a) 185 North 100 West

Wales, Utah 84667

Office Phone: 435-4368204

Fax: 435-436-5010

Email: Mustangheli@hotmail.com

b) This request letter is for exemption from 14 CFR Section 91.147 titled: PassengerCarrying Flights for Compensation or Hire.

c) The extent of relief that we are seeking is to combine Mustang Helicopter, LLC’s Section 

91.147 drug and alcohol program, with Mustang Helicopter, LLC’s Part 135 drug and 

alcohol program. This would allow better control of Mustang Helicopter, LLC’s 

employees as a whole, and allow our small company with limited personnel the ability to 

comply with regulations in a more efficient manner.

d) This request would benefit the public by allowing our small staff to utilize its experts to 

oversee a single drug and alcohol program. In addition, this would prevent us from 

assigning the responsibilities to personnel that are less suited to oversee such a large 

project as a drug testing program and all of the regulations that go with it.

e) By granting Mustang Helicopters, LLC. with an exemption to combine its drug and 

alcohol programs, safety will increase by allowing our experts to handle those duties they

are suited for. This in essence will allow for better oversight and compliance with the 

drug and alcohol regulations. 
f) Mustang Helicopters, LLC. would like to request an exemption from 14 CFR Section 

91.147, by being allowed to combine Mustang Helicopters, LLC’s 91.147 drug and 

alcohol program with Mustang Helicopters, LLC’s 135 drug and alcohol program. 

g) This request for a combined drug and alcohol program should be fairly common for a 

company like Mustang Helicopters, LLC. that has multiple departments that contain 

safety-sensitive positions. Clearly stated, why have multiple people performing the same 

function for a company that has so few safety-sensitive employees? This exemption 

would prevent this and allow a more complete oversight of the regulations and much 

easier, therefore safer, compliance.

h) Although Aviation is a world-wide industry, Mustang Helicopters, LLC. will only

conduct our drug and alcohol testing within the United States. Any flights beyond U.S. 

borders will be conducted by employees tested and regulated here within the U.S.
# C_2007095EN.01001101.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris — France) — Thomson Multimedia Sales Europe (C-447/05), Vestel France (C-448/05) v Administration des douanes et droits indirects

(Joined Cases C-447/05 and C-448/05) (1)

1

(Community Customs Code - Implementing measures - Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Annex 11 - Non-preferential origin of goods - Television receivers - Concept of substantial processing or working - Criterion of added value - Validity)

(2007/C 95/17)

Language of the cases: French

Referring court

Cour d'appel de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Thomson Multimedia Sales Europe (C-447/05), Vestel France (C-448/05)

Applicants:

Defendant: Administration des douanes et droits indirects

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Cour d'appel de Paris — Validity of Annex 11 to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1) — Criteria for determining the non-preferential origin of goods — Television manufactured in Poland but the cathode ray tube of which, representing 42.43 % of the value of the apparatus, originates in Korea

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the questions raised has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of the provisions in column three, under heading 8528 of the Combined Nomenclature, set out in Annex 11 to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.

1

---
{"agency":"PRC","generated":"2021-10-12 17:33:01","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2021"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["PRC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["10"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["10"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2021","quarter":"Q4"}
### §2277a–2. Board of Directors

#### (a) Establishment

The Corporation shall be managed by a Board of Directors that shall consist of the members of the Farm Credit Administration Board.

#### (b) Chairman

The Board of Directors shall be chaired by any Board member other than the Chairman of the Farm Credit Administration Board.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.53, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title III, §302, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1611; amended Pub. L. 102–552, title II, §201(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4104; Pub. L. 104–105, title II, §219(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 184.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–105 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to Board of Directors, including provisions relating to establishment, appointment, chairperson, postemployment prohibition, terms of office, succession, vacancies, oath, quorum, meetings, rules and records, compensation, and expenses.

1992—Pub. L. 102–552 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows:

"(a) Establishment.—The Corporation shall be managed by a Board of Directors that shall consist of the members of the Farm Credit Administration Board.

"(b) Chairman.—The Board of Directors shall be chaired by any Board member other than the Chairman of the Farm Credit Administration Board."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment; Transition Provision

Pub. L. 102–552, title II, §201(c), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4105, provided that:

"(1) In general.—The amendments made by this section [amending this section and sections 5314 and 5315 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees] shall become effective on January 1, 1996.

"(2) Transitional provision.—The Board of Directors of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation as established by section 5.53 of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2277a–2) (as it existed before the amendments made by subsection (a) of this section) shall continue in existence and continue to manage the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation until at least two members are appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to the new Board established by section 5.53 of such Act (as amended by subsection (a) of this section)."
§ 111.9 The reason to believe finding; notification (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(2)). ( a ) If the Commission, either after reviewing a complaint-generated recommendation as described in 11 CFR 111.7 and any response of a respondent submitted pursuant to 11 CFR 111.6, or after reviewing an internally-generated recommendation as described in 11 CFR 111.8, determines by an affirmative vote of four (4) of its members that it has reason to believe that a respondent has violated a statute or regulation over which the Commission has jurisdiction, its Chairman or Vice Chairman shall notify such respondent of the Commission's finding in writing, setting forth the sections of the statute or regulations alleged to have been violated and the alleged factual basis supporting the finding.
( b ) If the Commission finds no reason to believe, or otherwise terminates its proceedings, the General Counsel shall so advise both complainant and respondent in writing.
[45 FR 15120, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 89 FR 217, Jan. 2, 2024]
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-402V

UNPUBLISHED

MINDY BOTTS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: August 2, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Kristi Suzanne Schubert, Lamothe Law Firm, LLC, New Orleans, LA, for petitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On April 7, 2020, Mindy Botts filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 2, 2017 

and thereafter suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). 

Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of 

Special Masters.

On July 30, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, it is Respondent’s position that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

the Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation for a SIRVA 

injury caused by a flu vaccine. Id. at 6. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc. (the Company)
  on Form 10 K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
  I, Mark D. Dacko the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |    | Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc.
|--------------------- | -- | ---------------------------------
|                      |    |                                  
|                      |    |                                  
|                      |    |                                  
|Dated: March 26, 2004 | By | /s/ Mark D. Dacko                
|                      |    |                                  
|                      |    | Mark D. Dacko                    
|                      |    | Chief Financial Officer          

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11846-11847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


24th Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 Plenary: 
AIS and MET Data Link Services

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 Plenary: 
AIS and MET Data Link Services meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 Plenary: AIS and 
MET Data Link Services.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 21-25, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Honeywell Aerospace, Phoenix 
(DV), 21111 North 19th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85027-2704.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 
Plenary: AIS and MET Data Link Services meeting. The agenda will 
include:

March 21--Monday

    <bullet> 9 a.m.--Opening Plenary.
     <bullet> Chairmen's remarks and Host's comments.
     <bullet> Introductions.
     <bullet> Approval of previous meeting minutes.
     <bullet> Review and approve meeting agenda.
     <bullet> Schedule for this week.
     <bullet> Action Item Review.
     <bullet> Working Group 1, Work Plan--WG1 Chairmen.
     <bullet> Working Group 2, Work Plan--WG2 Chairmen.
     <bullet> Working Group 3, Recommendations--WG3 Chairmen.
     <bullet> Current status and deliverables of SESAR JU Project 
08.03.03 (Identify and Develop Aeronautical (and Meteorological) ATM 
Information Services)--Roger Li.
    <bullet> 1 p.m.--WG1, WG2, and WG3 Meetings.

[[Page 11847]]

March 22-24, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday

    <bullet> 9 a.m.--WG1, WG2, and WG3 Meetings.

March 25--Friday

    <bullet> 9 a.m.--WG1, WG2, and WG3 Meetings.
    <bullet> 10 a.m.--Plenary Session.
     <bullet> Working Group Reports.
     <bullet> Action Item Review.
     <bullet> Other Business.
     <bullet> Meeting plans and dates.
    <bullet> 12 p.m.--Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 25, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-4814 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
# Tribal Nations Partner in Prosperity

USDA_RD_TribalNationsPartnerInProsperity.pdf
### §506. Notice after separation from service

The resignation, termination of employment or participation, or separation of an institution-affiliated party (within the meaning of section 1813(u) of this title) with respect to a member bank (including a separation caused by the closing of such a bank) shall not affect the jurisdiction and authority of the Board to issue any notice and proceed under this section against any such party, if such notice is served before the end of the 6-year period beginning on the date such party ceased to be such a party with respect to such bank (whether such date occurs before, on, or after August 9, 1989).

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §19(m), as added Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, §905(g), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 461.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This section, referred to in text, means section 19 of act Dec. 23, 1913, which is classified to sections 142, 371b, 371b–1, 374, 374a, 461, 463 to 466, 505, and 506 of this title.
§ 9035.3 Contributions to and expenditures by Vice Presidential candidates. ( a ) *Aggregation of contributions and expenditures.* For purposes of the limitations on contributions and expenditures of this part and part 110, contributions to, and expenditures by, the authorized committee of a candidate who becomes the nominee of a political party for the office of Vice President of the United States shall be aggregated with contributions to and expenditures by the publicly funded primary candidate who obtains that political party's nomination for the office of President of the United States, provided that the contributions to or expenditures by the authorized committee of the Vice Presidential candidate were made on or after the date on which— ( 1 ) The Presidential or Vice Presidential candidate publicly indicates that the two candidates intend to run on the same ticket;
( 2 ) The candidate for the office of Vice President accepts an offer by the publicly funded primary candidate for the office of President, or by the Presidential candidate's agent(s), to run on the same ticket; or
( 3 ) The Presidential and Vice Presidential committees become affiliated pursuant to 11 CFR 100.5(g)(4)(i) or (ii).
( b ) *Exceptions.* The following expenditures, if incurred by the authorized committee of a candidate who subsequently becomes the nominee of a political party for the office of Vice President of the United States, will not be aggregated under paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) The cost of attendance by the candidate, the candidate's family, and the candidate's authorized committee's staff at a political party's national nominating convention, including the cost of transportation, lodging, and subsistence;
( 2 ) The cost of legal and accounting services associated with background checks during the Vice Presidential selection process; and
( 3 ) The cost of raising funds for the expenses listed in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section.
[64 FR 61781, Nov. 15, 1999]
#### § 306.5 Appeals.

Any appeal from a decision of any Program employee shall be made to his/her immediate supervisor having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the appeal, except as otherwise provided in the applicable rules of practice.

[48 FR 11418, Mar. 18, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 67454, Dec. 29, 1995]
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00255

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV

- 2022

- 01095

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### E DWARD 

### T HOMPSON 

### , Appellant

V



### .

S YLVIA 

### W RIGHT 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On September 30, 2022, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk
responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has
not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.
App. P. 35.3(a)(2). I n our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution unless, by October 10, 2022 , appellant arranged to pay for the
clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c),
37.3(b), 44.3

. Because appel lant has not provided us with proof of payment for the clerk’s
record, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 1 See Tex. R. App. P.
37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

D elivered : October 20, 2022

1 In other letters to appellant, we notified him that his docketing statement had

n ot bee n filed and directed him to file a docketing statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. Appellant has no t filed a docketing statement.
### §3706. Temporary members of the Reserve; eligibility and compensation

A citizen of the United States, its territories, or possessions who is a member of the Auxiliary, an officer or member of the crew of a motorboat or yacht placed at the disposal of the Coast Guard, or an individual (including a Government employee without pay other than the compensation of that individual's civilian position) who by reason of special training and experience is considered by the Commandant to be qualified for duty, may be enrolled by the Commandant as a temporary member of the Reserve, for duty under conditions the Commandant may prescribe, including part-time and intermittent active duty with or without pay, without regard to age. The Commandant is authorized to define the powers and duties of temporary members of the Reserve, and to confer upon them, appropriate to their qualifications and experience, the same grades and ratings as provided for members of the Reserve. When performing active duty with pay as authorized by this section, temporary members of the Reserve are entitled to receive the pay and allowances of their rank, grade, or rating.

(Added Pub. L. 96–322, §1, Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1004, §706; renumbered §3706, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §118(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4233; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(50), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4750.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 756 of this title prior to the complete revision of former chapter 21 of this title by Pub. L. 96–322.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "an individual" for "a person" and "individual's" for "person's".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 706 of this title as this section.