alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010317EN.01002202.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), lodged on 17 September 2010 — Oliver Jestel v Hauptzollamt Aachen

(Case C-454/10)

()

2010/C 317/40

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Oliver Jestel

Appellant:

Respondent: Hauptzollamt Aachen

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a person become a debtor liable to pay customs duties because of ‘participation’ in the unlawful introduction of goods into the customs territory of the European Union according to the second indent of Article 202(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, (1) where that person, without being directly involved in the introduction of goods, arranges the conclusion of the contracts to purchase the goods concerned and therefore envisages that the seller will possibly deliver the goods or part of the goods in such a way as to evade import duties? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a person become a debtor liable to pay customs duties because of ‘participation’ in the unlawful introduction of goods into the customs territory of the European Union according to the second indent of Article 202(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, (1) where that person, without being directly involved in the introduction of goods, arranges the conclusion of the contracts to purchase the goods concerned and therefore envisages that the seller will possibly deliver the goods or part of the goods in such a way as to evade import duties?

1

| 2. | If appropriate, is it sufficient that he considers this to be conceivable, or does he only become a debtor if he fully expects that this will happen? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If appropriate, is it sufficient that he considers this to be conceivable, or does he only become a debtor if he fully expects that this will happen?

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 21.1

The subsidiaries of Clarus Corporation are:

      Clarus International, Inc., a Delaware corporation

      Clarus eMEA, Ltd., a U.K. corporation

      Clarus CSA, Inc., a Delaware corporation

      Clarus CSA, Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Ireland

      SAI America Limited, a limited company incorporated under the laws of
Ireland

      SAI America LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

      SAI Recruitment Limited, a limited company incorporated under the laws of
Ireland

      i2Mobile.com Limited, a limited company incorporated under the laws of
Ireland

      Software Architects International, LLC, a limited company incorporated
under the laws of Ireland

      REDEO Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
### §285. Nonvoting stock

Stock not held by member banks shall not be entitled to voting power.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §2 (par.), 38 Stat. 253.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the eleventh par. of section 2 of act Dec. 23, 1913. For classification of other pars. of section 2 of this Act, see Codification note set out under section 222 of this title.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

s0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141132

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141132 COA: 296965 Kent CC: 08-013166-FC TERRANCE DEVON SEYMOUR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 21, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 110.5 [Reserved]
### §5101. Purposes and methods for establishing a mortgage licensing system and registry

In order to increase uniformity, reduce regulatory burden, enhance consumer protection, and reduce fraud, the States, through the Conference of State Bank Supervisors and the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators, are hereby encouraged to establish a Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry for the residential mortgage industry that accomplishes all of the following objectives:

(1) Provides uniform license applications and reporting requirements for State-licensed loan originators.

(2) Provides a comprehensive licensing and supervisory database.

(3) Aggregates and improves the flow of information to and between regulators.

(4) Provides increased accountability and tracking of loan originators.

(5) Streamlines the licensing process and reduces the regulatory burden.

(6) Enhances consumer protections and supports anti-fraud measures.

(7) Provides consumers with easily accessible information, offered at no charge, utilizing electronic media, including the Internet, regarding the employment history of, and publicly adjudicated disciplinary and enforcement actions against, loan originators.

(8) Establishes a means by which residential mortgage loan originators would, to the greatest extent possible, be required to act in the best interests of the consumer.

(9) Facilitates responsible behavior in the subprime mortgage market place and provides comprehensive training and examination requirements related to subprime mortgage lending.

(10) Facilitates the collection and disbursement of consumer complaints on behalf of State and Federal mortgage regulators.

(Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title V, §1502, July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2810.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2015 Amendment

Pub. L. 114–94, div. G, title LXXXVIII, §88001, Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1799, provided that: "This title [amending section 5110 of this title] may be cited as the 'State Licensing Efficiency Act of 2015'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title V, §1501, July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2810, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008' or 'S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008'."
### §3757. Notice of default and foreclosure sale

The notice of default and foreclosure sale to be served in accordance with this chapter shall set forth—

(1) the name and address of the foreclosure commissioner;

(2) the date on which the notice is issued;

(3) the names of—

(A) the Secretary;

(B) the original mortgagee (if other than the Secretary); and

(C) the original mortgagor;

(4) the street address or a description of the location of the security property, and a description of the security property, sufficient to identify the property to be sold;

(5) the date of the mortgage, the office in which the mortgage is recorded, and the liber number and folio or other appropriate description of the location of recordation of the mortgage;

(6) identification of the failure to make payment, including the due date of the earliest installment payment remaining wholly unpaid as of the date on which the notice is issued upon which the foreclosure is based, or a description of any other default or defaults upon which foreclosure is based, and the acceleration of the secured indebtedness;

(7) the date, time, and location of the foreclosure sale;

(8) a statement that the foreclosure is being conducted pursuant to this chapter;

(9) a description of the types of costs, if any, to be paid by the purchaser upon transfer of title;

(10) the amount and method of deposit to be required at the foreclosure sale (except that no deposit shall be required of the Secretary) and the time and method of payment of the balance of the foreclosure purchase price; and

(11) any other appropriate terms of sale or information, as the Secretary may determine.

(Pub. L. 103–327, title II, Sept. 28, 1994, 108 Stat. 2316.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 808 of title VIII of S. 2281, One Hundred Third Congress, as reported July 13, 1994, which was enacted into law by Pub. L. 103–327.
#### STATE v. HOFFMAN

No. 474P89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 647

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990.
#### KING v. CRANFORD, WHITAKER & DICKENS

No. 536P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 245

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 March 1990.
Bartlett Subsection 05(16). Permits and Fees - Reporting Requirements.

(a) Except as provided below, each permitted stationary air pollution source 

must submit to the Department an annual report that establishes the amount 

of actual emissions of each regulated pollutant, including carbon monoxide, 

for that source. This report will be for the emissions of that source that 

occurred during the calendar year starting in 1991 and continuing for 

succeeding years thereafter. The Department may request, and the air 

pollution source shall provide, additional information on the emissions 

data submitted when the Department determines, the data previously provided 

is inadequate to establish the actual type or amount of emissions from the 

source subject to fees.

(b) Not including air toxics as they are defined in the Clean Air Act 

Amendments of 1990 and the amendments thereto, if the source emits fewer 

than twenty five (25) tons of actual emissions of pollutant during a year, 

it may at its option, use as the actual emissions figure, its permitted 

pollutant levels where available and known. If the source is a "major 

source" under the air toxics provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 

1990 it too must calculate its actual emission of regulated pollutants. 

Failure to provide, on a timely basis, any additional information requested 

shall be considered failure to pay the fees.

05(16), p. 1
# C_2006162EN.01000101.xml

| 13.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 July 2006

(2006/C 162/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2722 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4594 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1625 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5658 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 94,55 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9475 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,490 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0458 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5743 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,715 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9854 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6880 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4452 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8933 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0633 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0151 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 207,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,0749 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1669 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2530 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 589,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,650 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,371 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2280 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,208 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2722

JPY

Japanese yen

146,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4594

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69150

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1625

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5658

ISK

Iceland króna

94,55

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9475

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,490

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0458

RON

Romanian leu

3,5743

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,715

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9854

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6880

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4452

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8933

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0633

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0151

KRW

South Korean won

1 207,00

ZAR

South African rand

9,0749

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1669

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2530

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 589,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,650

PHP

Philippine peso

66,371

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2280

THB

Thai baht

48,208

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 201.81 Suspended registrants.

No stockyard owner, packer, market agency, or dealer shall employ any person who has been suspended as a registrant to perform activities in connection with livestock transactions subject to the jurisdiction of the Secretary under the Act during the period of such suspension: *Provided,* That the provisions of this section shall not be construed to prohibit the employment of any person who has been suspended as a registrant until such time as the person demonstrates solvency or obtains the bond required under the Act and regulations. No such person shall be employed, however, until after the expiration of any specified period of suspension contained in the order of suspension.

(7 U.S.C. 222 and 228 and 15 U.S.C. 46)

[49 FR 37374, Sept. 24, 1984]
#### The City of New York, Appellant, v. New York City Railway Company, Respondent (Car License C-10).

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho.opinion.
#### § 9002.13 Contribution.

*Contribution* has the same meaning given the term under 52 U.S.C. 30101(8), 30118, and 30119, and under 11 CFR part 100, subparts B and C, and 11 CFR parts 114 and 115.

[56 FR 35911, July 29, 1991, as amended at 67 FR 78682, Dec. 26, 2002; 79 FR 77850, Dec. 29, 2014]
# C_2010301EN.01000402.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/4

---

Action brought on 20 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-362/10)

()

2010/C 301/06

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. La Pergola and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws and regulations necessary for the proper transposition of Articles 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 of Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information, (1) the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions of the directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws and regulations necessary for the proper transposition of Articles 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 of Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information, (1) the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions of the directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the applicant’s submission, the Republic of Poland has hitherto not adopted national measures correctly transposing Directive 2003/98 into national law. The Ustawa z 6 września 2001 r. o dostępie do informacji publicznej (Law of 6 September 2001 on access to public information), which was notified to the Commission, does not relate to the re-use of public sector information, because it does not even contain a definition of ‘re-use’. For that reason alone, the rights and obligations resulting from that Law cannot constitute a correct transposition of Directive 2003/98.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 345, p. 90.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR TilE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: William Bush and Mari Marc S.A. de C.V.v. Cardtronics, Inc. and

Cardtronics S.A. de C.V.

Appellate case number: 01-12-00708-CV

Trial court case number: 1031459

Trial court: 281 st District Court of Harris County

Appellant William Bush, proceeding pro se, has filed a brief signed by himself only, purporting

to be on behalf of himself and on behalf of appellant Mari Marc, S.A. de C.V. Bush asserts in

the brief that Mari Marc, S.A. de C.V. is a Mexican corporation.

Texas courts have consistently held that a non-attorney may not appear pro se on behalf of a

corporation. Corona v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 245 S.W.3d 75, 79 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2008,

pet. denied); see Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., USA, 937 S.W.2d 455, 456

(Tex. 1996). A corporation may be represented only by a licensed attorney in the prosecution of

its appeal. See Moore v. Elektro-Mobil Technik GmbH, 874 S.W.2d 324, 327 (Tex. App.--E1

Paso 1994, writ denied).

Accordingly, if it desires to prosecute its appeal, Mari Marc, S.A. de C.V. must retain licensed

counsel to represent it. Any attorney retained to represent Marl Marc, S.A. de C.V. in this appeal

must make an appearance by filing a notice of representation xvith the Clerk of this ,Court by

January 4, 2013. If such notice of representation is not filed, Marl Marc, S.A. de C.V. s appeal

will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c); see also MHL

Dabal/Graphic Resource, No. 14-05-00295-CV, 2005 WL 1404475

[14th Dist.] June 16, 2005, no pet.) (mere. op.).

Homebuilder LLC v.

(Tex. App.--Houston
In addition, appellants’ brief filed on November 21, 2012 ~s stricken. Appellant William Bush

may file an amended appellant’s brief acting pro se on behalf of himself only. An amended

briefing schedule will be set once it is determined whether Mari Marc, S.A. de C.V. will be

retaining counsel to represent it in this appeal or whether its appeal will be dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/Laura C. Higley

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date: December 13, 2012
| | Certification by CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 
1350, as adapted pursuant to Section 906 of the 
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 | Exhibit 13.1
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------





The certification set
forth below is being submitted in connection with BBVA Banco Francés S.A.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code as adapted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.



Martín Ezequiel
Zarich, the Chief Executive Officer and Ignacio Sanz y Arcelus, the Chief Financial Officer of BBVA Banco Francés S.A.,
each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of BBVA Banco Francés S.A.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 26, 2016



| | /s/ Martín Ezequiel Zarich                                                          
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Martín Ezequiel
        Zarich
        
        Title: Chief Executive Officer









| | /s/  Ignacio Sanz y Arcelus                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Ignacio Sanz y Arcelus
        
        Title: Chief Financial
Officer
## Browse All Stories

### Family Roots Run Deep Growing Aquaponic Produce in Montana

[Read More]

02.14.2024

Local Produce

### Green energy: photovoltaic array powers growth of Alaskan produce business

[Read More]

11.01.2023

BusinessEnergyLocal FoodsLocal ProduceREAPRenewable EnergyRural DevelopmentSmall BusinessSolar Energy

### Love Continues to Grow at Lovefood Farm

[Read More]

05.04.2023

EntrepreneurFood SupplyKnow Your FarmerLocal FoodsLocal ProduceSmall BusinessSustainable/Organic FoodsValue Added

### Feeding the Body, Enriching the Mind

[Read More]

05.04.2023

Food SupplyGrantsLocal FoodsLocal ProduceSmall BusinessValue Added

### Keeping it local works best for Utah orchard farmer

[Read More]

05.03.2023

Food SupplyGrantsLocal FoodsLocal ProduceValue Added

### From Blossom to Bottle, Superior View Farm Offers Views and Brews

[Read More]

03.29.2023

BusinessLocal ProduceMade in Rural AmericaRural DevelopmentSmall BusinessValue Added

### REAP Funding Helps Pennsylvania Business Go Solar

[Read More]

03.23.2023

Economic DevelopmentElectricGrantsLocal ProduceREAPSolar EnergySustainable/Organic Foods

### Sustainability at the Core

[Read More]

03.15.2023

EnergyGrantsSustainable/Organic FoodsLocal ProduceMade in Rural AmericaREAPRural DevelopmentSmall BusinessSolar EnergyValue Added

### What a great idea, how come nobody thought of this before?

[Read More]

01.24.2023

Food SupplyGrantsLocal Produce

### Solar: It’s a “Big Dill” for Real Pickles Cooperative

[Read More]

10.20.2022

CooperativesEnergySustainable/Organic FoodsLocal FoodsLocal ProduceREAPRenewable EnergyRural Development

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2
### §5627. Regulations

#### (a) In general

The Secretary is authorized to promulgate regulations to implement and administer the grant programs and undertakings authorized by this subchapter.

#### (b) Regulatory authority

Regulations prescribed under this section may contain such classifications, differentiations, or other provisions, and may provide for such adjustments and exceptions for any class of grant programs, undertakings, or eligible entities, as, in the judgment of the Secretary, are necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this subchapter, to prevent circumvention or evasion of this subchapter, or to facilitate compliance with this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title XII, §1209, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2132.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title XII of Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2129, known as the Improving Access to Mainstream Financial Institutions Act of 2010, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title XII to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.