alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Federal Finance Company *v.*Spugnardi.

[No. 12,228.

Filed November 6, 1925.]

Bills and *Notes.—In action by indorsee of note made payable to maker and properly indorsed to plaintiff, judgment should be given the latter where no defense*shown.—In an action by an indorsee of a note payable to the maker and properly indorsed by him to plaintiff, where the only evidence introduced was the note itself and testimony as to reasonable fee for plaintiff’s attorney, judgment should be given for the plaintiff.

From Clay Circuit Court; *Thomas W. Hutchinson,*Judge.

Action by the Federal Finance Company against George Spugnardi. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals. *Reversed.*By the court in banc.

*Samuel W. Lee*and *William T. Young,*for appellant.

Nichols, P. J.

Action by appellant against appellee' to recover judgment on a promissory note. The complaint was in one paragraph in the usual form of such complaints and was answered by a general denial unverified. A trial by the court resulted in a finding and judgment for appellee. The error assigned in this court is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, which motion presents the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision of the court. The note sued upon and which was made a part of the complaint by exhibit was read in evidence and is in words and figures as follows, to wit:

> *604Brazil, Ind., August 17, 1922.

> “$500

> “Six months after date I promise to pay to the order of myself five hundred and 00/100 dollars.

> For value received without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws with interest at 7 per cent per annum from date until paid and all Attorney’s fees negotiable and payable at Brazil Trust Co., drawers and endorsers severally waive presentment for payment, protest and notice of protest and non-payment of this note.

> GEORGE SPUGNARDI.

> “No. Due

> Pltffs. Ex. A.

> (Endorsement on Back)

> George Spugnardi.”

In addition to the note, the only evidence given was that the note which was put in evidence was the original note sued on, and as to a reasonable fee for plaintiff’s attorney. Appellee has filed no brief, and has therefore pointed out no reason why judgment should not have been rendered for appellant and we know of none.

Judgment reversed, with instruction to grant a new trial.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <ckopecky@capitalpowerusa.com>

Date: 7/20/2010 3:24 PM

Subject: Re: Steam Electric Power Generating Questionnaires

Attachments: pic13194.gif

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the following Capital Power Operations Inc.

facilities:

 Primary Energy Roxboro

 Primary Energy Southport

The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed

questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic13194.gif)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Years Ended
                                              ---------------------------------
                                                June 26,    June 27,  June 28,
                                                  1999        1998      1997
                                              ------------  --------- ---------
<S>                                           <C>           <C>       <C>
Net earnings (loss).........................  $ (1,250,922) 4,020,604   937,759
                                              ============  ========= =========
Basic earnings (loss) per share: Weighted
 average common shares outstanding..........     9,398,289  8,052,926 6,686,253
Basic earnings (loss) per share.............  $      (0.13)      0.50      0.14
                                              ============  ========= =========
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding..     9,398,289  8,052,926 6,686,253
Weighted average common equivalent shares
 due to stock options and warrants..........             0    476,021    91,187
                                              ------------  --------- ---------
                                                 9,398,289  8,528,947 6,777,440
                                              ============  ========= =========
Diluted earnings (loss) per share...........  $      (0.13)      0.47      0.14
                                              ============  ========= =========
</TABLE>
# C_2010246EN.01002202.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/22

---

Action brought on 22 June 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-304/10)

()

2010/C 246/38

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin and D. Milanowska, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure application of Council Directive 2004/82/EC of 29 April 2004 on the obligation of carriers to communicate passenger data, (1) or, in any event, by not informing the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure application of Council Directive 2004/82/EC of 29 April 2004 on the obligation of carriers to communicate passenger data, (1) or, in any event, by not informing the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which Directive 2004/82 had to be transposed expired on 5 September 2006.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 261, p. 24.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0001005229
<NAME>                  COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                               3,062
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      152,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        110,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   304,259
<PP&E>                                             142,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                      56,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     760,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               99,266
<BONDS>                                            415,642
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               149
<OTHER-SE>                                         208,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       760,280
<SALES>                                            188,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   188,378
<CGS>                                              141,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      141,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26,836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     12,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6,092
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,946
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,946
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .42


</TABLE>
### §73. Oath

Each director, when appointed or elected, shall take an oath that he will, so far as the duty devolves on him, diligently and honestly administer the affairs of such association, and will not knowingly violate or willingly permit to be violated any of the provisions of title 62 of the Revised Statutes, and that he is the owner in good faith, and in his own right, of the number of shares of stock required by title 62 of the Revised Statutes, subscribed by him, or standing in his name on the books of the association, and that the same is not hypothecated, or in any way pledged, as security for any loan or debt. The oath shall be taken before a notary public, properly authorized and commissioned by the State in which he resides, or before any other officer having an official seal and authorized by the State to administer oaths, except that the oath shall not be taken before any such notary public or other officer who is an officer of the director's bank. The oath, subscribed by the director making it, and certified by the notary public or other officer before whom it is taken, shall be immediately transmitted to the Comptroller of the Currency and shall be filed and preserved in his office for a period of ten years.

(R.S. §5147; Feb. 20, 1925, ch. 274, 43 Stat. 955.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title 62 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in text, was in the original "this Title" meaning title LXII of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§5133 to 5244, which are classified to this section and sections 16, 21, 22 to 24a, 25a, 25b, 26, 27, 29, 35 to 37, 39, 43, 52, 53, 55 to 57, 59 to 62, 66, 71, 72, 74 to 76, 81, 83 to 86, 90, 91, 93, 93a, 94, 141 to 144, 161, 164, 181, 182, 192 to 194, 196, 215c, 481 to 485, 501, 541, 548, and 582 of this title. See, also, sections 8, 333, 334, 475, 656, 709, 1004, and 1005 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure. For complete classification of R.S. §§5133 to 5244 to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

R.S. §5147 derived from act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, §9, 13 Stat. 102, which was the National Bank Act. See section 38 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exception as to Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by any provision of law in Comptroller of the Currency, referred to in this section, not included in transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 1 of this title.
-  Home 
-  Newsroom 

# In This Section

                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Reports to Congress 
                      -  Congressional Testimony 
                      -  Speeches 

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# PHMSA Pipeline Annual Report Changes for Calendar Year 2024 (reports submitted in 2025)

Pipeline operators are in the midst of submitting calendar year 2023 annual reports to PHMSA with data as-of 12/31/2023.  During 2024, pipeline operators may need to change their internal systems for collecting excavation damage data for annual reports due in 2025. ***Hazardous Liquid and Carbon Dioxide Annual Report***In late March 2023, the Office of Management & Budget (OMB) approved adding Part R to collect excavation damage data – damages and number of one-call tickets.  Since OMB approved the change part-way through 2023, PHMSA did not expect operators to have the requested excavation damage data for the first three months of 2023.  Rather than collecting a partial year of data for 2023, PHMSA will begin collecting Part R data with CY 2024 reports submitted to PHMSA in 2025.  The remaining changes to the Hazardous Liquid and Carbon Dioxide Annual Report attempt to fully align Parts J (miles by % SMYS) and K (safety-regulated gathering) with 49 CFR Part 195.  The changes in Parts J and K will also be deferred until CY 2024 reports submitted to PHMSA in 2025. ***Gas Distribution Annual Report***In June 2023, OMB approved changing and expanding the number of excavation damage root cause options in Part D.  To ensure operators have captured the new root cause values for a full year, PHMSA will implement the information collection change with CY 2024 reports submitted to PHMSA in 2025. ***Gas Transmission and Gathering Annual Report***During 2023, OMB approved two sets of changes.  Since OMB approved the changes part-way through 2023, PHMSA does not expect operators to have the requested data for all of 2023.  Rather than collecting a partial year of data for 2023, PHMSA will begin collecting the new data with CY 2024 reports submitted to PHMSA in early 2025.  Changes for the CY 2024 annual report are:
                      -  Adding condition repair categories for 49 CFR §192.710 segments in Part F
                      -  Adding excavation damage data – damages and number of one-call tickets - in Parts M4 and M5

 Current and superseded versions of pipeline operator reports submitted to PHMSA are available at Operator Reports Submitted to PHMSA - Forms and Instructions | PHMSA (dot.gov)
#### § 700.547 Consuming intoxicants on Government premises or during duty hours.

Consuming alcohol or non-prescription drugs on agency premises, or while driving or riding in a Government vehicle, or during working hours are prohibited conduct and employees violating this regulation are subject to disciplinary action, including discharge.
### §627. State taxation

Any corporation organized under the provisions of this subchapter shall be subject to tax by the State within which its home office is located in the same manner and to the same extent as other corporations organized under the laws of that State which are transacting a similar character of business. The shares of stock in such corporation shall also be subject to tax as the personal property of the owners or holders thereof in the same manner and to the same extent as the shares of stock in similar State corporations.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §25A (par.), formerly §25(a), as added Dec. 24, 1919, ch. 18, 41 Stat. 378; renumbered §25A, Pub. L. 102–242, title I, §142(e)(2), Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2281.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this section", meaning section 25A of act Dec. 23, 1913, which is classified to this subchapter (§611 et seq.).

#### Codification

Section is comprised of par. 19 (undesignated) of section 25A of act Dec. 23, 1913, which comprises this subchapter. For complete classification of section 25A of this Act, see Codification note set out under section 611 of this title.
#### § 124.43 Administrative decision.

Within 30 days after completion of the due diligence hearing, the Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs, taking into consideration the recommendation of the Administrator, will affirm or revise the determination made under § 124.32. APHIS will publish the due diligence redetermination in the Federal Register, notify PTO of the redetermination, and send copies of the notice to PTO and the requesting party, the applicant, and the petitioner.

[59 FR 11369, Feb. 25, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 43045, Aug. 9, 1999]
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Grants to Help Rural Businesses 

Produce and Market Value-Added Products

WASHINGTON, Dec. 5, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under Secretary 

Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is accepting applications for grants to establish and operate 

Agriculture Innovation Centers (AIC). AICs provide technical and business development assistance to 

agricultural producers seeking to market or produce value-added products.

USDA is making $8 million available under the Agriculture Innovation Center Program. AICs may use the 

grants to provide assistance to help agricultural producers develop and market value-added products as follows:

• business development services

• market development services

• financial advisory services 

• process development services, such as engineering, production system scale ups, scale production 

assessments and systems development

• organizational assistance, including legal and technical advisory services

• value chain coordination

• product development, excluding research and development

• grants of $5,000 or less to agricultural producers for the services listed above

• center start-up and operation

Recipients must provide matching funds of least one-third of the project budget. 

Eligible applicants include nonprofit organizations, commercial organizations, local governments, state 

governments, Indian Tribes, and institutions of higher education. Applications for grants must be submitted 

through Grants.gov no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on March 5, 2023. For more information, see page 

74392 of the Dec. 5, 2022 Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION VII

901 NORTH 5TH STREET

KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101

September 23, 2011

Dear Owner/Resident:

Byron H Gardner

Omaha, Nebraska 68105

1722 South 26 Street

 1722 South 26 Street

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of 

this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior 

surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist 

that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 1722 South 26 Street. The EPA has developed paint 

stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a 

structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if 

all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil 

under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint 

observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was 

measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument.

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead 

concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were 

to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. 

For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the 

ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch 

of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP 

provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses 

these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint 

stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, 

particularly where children under the age of seven reside.

 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your 

house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization. 

RE: SAID: 19102
Enclosures

Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045.

Sincerely,

Pauletta R. France-Isetts

Project Coordinator

Environmental Protection Agency

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at 

(402) 731-3045.

Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment 1 IIIIIIIIIII lllHl l1111 19 1 02 

Sample Number Lead Loadmg Structure/Feature Substrate Color Deteriorated 

(Window s~d~ng, porch, etc (Wood concrete etc ) Area 

LEGEND: H -N -P-01 -19102 

LEVID Number j 1 I Sampte Number 

- - -- P -- 19102 rngcrr? 

I LBPI I Prmted: LI.lul-CN 

Samples Analyzed 

XRF Un~t ~RGQP Book
§ 205.212 “Buyer in ordinary course of business” and “security interest.” The terms “buyer in ordinary course of business” and “security interest” are defined in subsections (c) (1) and (7). There are differences between those definitions and the UCC definitions of the same terms. In interpreting those differences, the following would be pertinent: ( a ) The legislative intent discussed above in § 205.211, to pre-empt State laws reflecting the “farm products” exception; and
( b ) The legislative intent shown in subsections (a) and (b) that certain persons take free and clear of certain interests of a “secured lender” “when the seller fails to repay the lender,” unless such persons have information about such interests made available to them as provided in the Section.
#### § 183.18 Information collection requirements

The information collection requirements contained in this part do not meet the requirements of “ten or more persons” annually; therefore, the Office of Management and Budget does not need to clear the collection. You may direct comments concerning this information collection to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Information Collection Control Officer, 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, DC 20240.
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      June 22, 2010 | /s/ Gary W. Douglass                                          |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Name:      Gary W. Douglass                                   |   |
|                     | Title:        President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----