alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §348. Discount of obligations given for agricultural purposes or based upon livestock; collateral security for Federal reserve notes

Upon the indorsement of any of its member banks, which shall be deemed a waiver of demand, notice, and protest by such bank as to its own indorsement exclusively, any Federal reserve bank may, subject to regulations and limitations to be prescribed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, discount notes, drafts, and bills of exchange issued or drawn for an agricultural purpose, or based upon livestock, and having a maturity, at the time of discount, exclusive of days of grace, not exceeding nine months, and such notes, drafts, and bills of exchange may be offered as collateral security for the issuance of Federal reserve notes under the provisions of section 16 of this Act: Provided, That notes, drafts, and bills of exchange with maturities in excess of six months shall not be eligible as a basis for the issuance of Federal reserve notes unless secured by warehouse receipts or other such negotiable documents conveying or securing title to readily marketable staple agricultural products or by chattel mortgage upon livestock which is being fattened for market.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §13A (par.), formerly §13a, as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title IV, §404, 42 Stat. 1479; amended Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704; renumbered §13A, Pub. L. 102–242, title I, §142(e)(1), Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2281.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 16 of this Act, referred to in text, means section 16 of act Dec. 23, 1913. For classification of section 16 to this title, see Codification note set out under section 411 of this title.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of first par. of section 13A, formerly section 13a, as added Mar. 4, 1923. Pars. 2 to 5 of section 13A are set out as sections 349 to 352 of this title, respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
### §2304. Compulsory retirement at age of sixty-two

Any enlisted member who has reached the age of sixty-two shall be retired from active service.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 520, §353; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(A), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; Pub. L. 99–348, title II, §205(b)(8), July 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 700; renumbered §2304, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §113(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4221.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §173 (Apr. 12, 1902, ch. 501, §4, 32 Stat. 100).

Section 173 of title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., has been divided. That part dealing with enlisted men is placed in this section. That part dealing with commissioned officers is placed in section 230 of this title. That part dealing with warrant officers is placed in section 303 of this title.

The compulsory retirement age is changed from 64 to 62 in order to make it the same for enlisted men as for officers. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 353 of this title as this section.

1986—Pub. L. 99–348 struck out ", with retired pay of the grade or rating with which retired" after "active service".

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to enlisted member for reference to enlisted man.
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SOLECTRON CORPORATION:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration 
statements (Nos. 333-24293, 333-02523, 333-17643, 33-58580, 33-46686, 
33-57575, 33-75270 and 33-33461) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of Solectron 
Corporation of our report dated September 14, 1998, relating to the 
consolidated balance sheets of Solectron Corporation and subsidiaries 
as of August 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements 
of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in 
the three-year period ended August 31, 1998, and the related schedule, 
which report appears in the August 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K 
of Solectron Corporation.



                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Mountain View, California
November 11, 1998
# C_2007129EN.01002202.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/22

---

Action brought on 13 April 2007 — Last Minute Network v OHIM — Last Minute Tour (LAST MINUTE TOUR)

(Case T-114/07)

(2007/C 129/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Last Minute Network Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Brownlow, solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Last Minute Tour SpA (Milan, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Quash in its entirety the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the respondent, the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), dated 8 February 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Quash in its entirety the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the respondent, the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), dated 8 February 2007;

| — | declare CTM No 1 552 231 invalid in respect of classes 39 and 42; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare CTM No 1 552 231 invalid in respect of classes 39 and 42;

| — | award the costs against the respondent. |
| --- | --- |

—

award the costs against the respondent.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The figurative mark ‘LAST MINUTE TOUR ’for products and services in classes 16, 39 and 42 — Community trade mark No 1 552 231

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Last Minute Tour SpA

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The national non-registered word mark ‘LASTMINUTE.COM ’for services in classes 39 and 42

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark for the services in classes 39 and 42 and rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity for the goods in class 16

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Cancellation Division's decision and rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly decided that the applicant's non registered trade mark did not confer on him the right to prohibit the use in the United Kingdom of the trade mark applied for and as the Board of Appeal wrongly applied the test to establish likelihood of confusion.

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 31. 1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Torvec, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting,
or caused such internal controls over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based upon such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 16, 2009
    /s/ James Y. GleasmanJames Y. GleasmanChief Executive Officer and
Interim Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011089EN.01002801.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/28

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 February 2011 — Chiavegato v Commission

(Case F-60/10) (1)

1

2011/C 89/54

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following amicable settlement.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.10, p. 28.

1

---
LaneCountyBoundary AreaCoveredbytheOregonSmokeManagementPlanLANECOUNTYAREASCOVEREDBYTHEOREGONSMOKEMANAGEMENTPLANCLOSEUPOFTHEFLORENCEAREACLOSEUPOFTHECENTRALAREAFILEASOPENEDINGOOGLEEARTHPROBEFOREADDINGCOUNTYBOUNDARIES,CITYNAMES,ANDREVISINGTHECOLORS
# C_2010209EN.01002201.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — David Claes v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation)

(Case C-235/10)

()

2010/C 209/28

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: David Claes

Applicant:

Defendant: Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation)

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (1) to be interpreted as applying to a termination of activities as a result of a declaration that the employer is insolvent or a judicial decision ordering the dissolution and winding-up, on grounds of insolvency, of the credit institution which is the employer on the basis of Article 61(l)(a) and (b) of the amended Law of 5 April 1993 relating to the financial sector, in respect of which termination the national legislation provides for the termination of employment contracts with immediate effect? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (1) to be interpreted as applying to a termination of activities as a result of a declaration that the employer is insolvent or a judicial decision ordering the dissolution and winding-up, on grounds of insolvency, of the credit institution which is the employer on the basis of Article 61(l)(a) and (b) of the amended Law of 5 April 1993 relating to the financial sector, in respect of which termination the national legislation provides for the termination of employment contracts with immediate effect?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, are Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Directive 98/59/EC to be interpreted as meaning that the administrator or liquidator is to be deemed to be in the same position as an employer who is contemplating collective redundancies and who is capable of carrying out, to that end, the acts referred to in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 98/53/EC and of effecting such redundancies (judgment in Case C-323/08, paragraphs 39, 40 and 41)? (2) |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, are Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Directive 98/59/EC to be interpreted as meaning that the administrator or liquidator is to be deemed to be in the same position as an employer who is contemplating collective redundancies and who is capable of carrying out, to that end, the acts referred to in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 98/53/EC and of effecting such redundancies (judgment in Case C-323/08, paragraphs 39, 40 and 41)? (2)

2

---

(1)  OJ 1998 L 225, p. 16.

1

(2)  Judgment of 10 December 2009 in Case C-323/08 Rodríguez Mayor and Others

2

Rodríguez Mayor and Others

---
#### § 312.7 [Reserved]
Attachment
# C_2006168EN.01000401.xml

| 20.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 July 2006

(2006/C 168/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2482 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4610 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68365 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2585 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5692 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 93,52 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9690 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,461 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,87 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0216 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5904 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,594 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9685 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6766 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4214 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7059 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0069 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9911 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 195,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,9778 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9886 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2420 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 552,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,612 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,824 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,7850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,708 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2482

JPY

Japanese yen

146,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4610

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68365

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2585

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5692

ISK

Iceland króna

93,52

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9690

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,461

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,87

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0216

RON

Romanian leu

3,5904

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,594

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9685

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6766

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4214

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7059

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0069

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9911

KRW

South Korean won

1 195,65

ZAR

South African rand

8,9778

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9886

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2420

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 552,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,612

PHP

Philippine peso

65,824

RUB

Russian rouble

33,7850

THB

Thai baht

47,708

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 32 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Torvec, Inc. (Torvec) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith E. Gleasman, president
and interim chief financial officer of Torvec, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Torvec,
Inc.
 S  Keith E. Gleasman

Keith E. Gleasman, President and

Interim Chief Financial Officer May 17, 2010 Issuer Statement
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Torvec,
Inc. and will be retained by Torvec, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. 99
UNITED STATES
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
   Washington, D.C. 20549
   FORM 6-K
   REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16
   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
   For the month of October 2011
  
 Commission File No. 001-09987
 
 
 B + H  O C E A N  C A R R I E R S  L T D.
 (Translation of registrant’s name into English)
 
 
 3rd Floor, Par La Ville Place
 14 Par-La-Ville Road
 Hamilton HM JX Bermuda
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
 
 Form 20-F                      X           Form 40-F
 
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (1):
 
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (7):
 
 Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 Yes           NoX
  
   INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT
  
 Set forth herein as Exhibit 99.1 is the Press Release, Dated October 19, 2011, regarding the announcement of record date, annual general meeting date and plan for reverse forward stock split.
 Set forth herein as Exhibit 99.2 is the Proxy Statement for the 2011 annual general meeting.
 Set forth herein as Exhibit 99.3 is the Press Release, Dated September 22, 2011, regarding the availability of the registrant’s Annual Report.
  
  
 Signatures
 
 
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 B+H Ocean Carriers Ltd.
 
 Date: October 19, 2011                                                                         By:  /s/ Michael S. Hudner
 Chief Executive Officer
### §707. Department of Commerce

In order to promote the safety of life and property on and over the high seas and waters over which the United States has jurisdiction, and to facilitate the preparation and dissemination by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the weather reports, forecasts, and warnings essential to the safe and efficient conduct of domestic and international commerce on and over such seas and waters, the Commandant may cooperate with the Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration by procuring, maintaining, and making available, facilities and assistance for observing, investigating, and communicating weather phenomena and for disseminating weather data, forecasts and warnings, the mutually satisfactory terms of such cooperation in weather service to be agreed upon and arranged between the Commandant and the Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 507, §147; Pub. L. 94–546, §1(13), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2520; Pub. L. 97–295, §2(5), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1301; renumbered §707, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §106(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4203.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section outlines the sphere of cooperation between the Weather Bureau and the Coast Guard. It would not permit any cooperation that has not been carried on in the past.

Although the Coast Guard has always cooperated closely with the Weather Bureau, positive recognition of this has never appeared in the statutes. In its patrol, its aiding navigation, and its life saving activities, the Coast Guard finds it important to make, receive and transmit weather observations and measurements. Furthermore, with the advent of war, weather reporting, particularly mid-Atlantic weather patrol work, assumed increasing importance, and this extensive weather station manning in cooperation with the Weather Bureau must be provided for in the postwar period. This section providing for such close cooperation with the Weather Bureau in weather reporting would crystallize the cooperative practices of the two agencies as they have operated for years. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 707 was renumbered section 3707 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 147 of this title as this section.

1982—Pub. L. 97–295 substituted "Administration" for "Admministration" after "Atmospheric".

1976—Pub. L. 94–546 substituted references to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and to the Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for references to the Weather Bureau and to the Chief of the Weather Bureau.