alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JULY 31, 1997 AND 1996 (AUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 1997, 1996 AND
1995 (AUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,113
<PP&E>                                          11,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,478
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,543
<SALES>                                        214,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,485
<CGS>                                          201,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  201,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                       994
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 39.802 What is the student unit value in the formula? The student unit value is the dollar value applied to each student in an academic or residential program. There are two types of student unit values: the student unit instructional value (SUIV) and the student unit residential value (SURV). ( a ) The student unit instructional value (SUIV) applies to a student enrolled in an instructional program. It is an annually established ratio of 1.0 that represents a student in grades 4 through 6 of a typical non-residential program.
( b ) The student unit residential value (SURV) applies to a residential student. It is an annually established ratio of 1.0 that represents a student in grades 4 through 6 of a typical residential program.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00892-CR

IN RE Timothy GAFFNEY

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 31, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On December 19, 2014, relator Timothy Gaffney filed a pro se petition for writ of 

mandamus complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on a pending motion. Relator was 

convicted and sentenced in the underlying criminal matter in October 2012 and no direct appeal 

of his conviction or sentence was taken to this court.

Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to postconviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 

802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 

(West Supp. 2014); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth 

Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding “Article 11.07 provides the exclusive 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010CR1998, styled The State of Texas v. Timothy Gaffney, pending in the 

144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Lorina I. Rummel presiding.

 
04-14-00892-CR

means to challenge a final felony conviction.”). Because the relief sought in relator’s petition 

relates to post-conviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction, we are without 

jurisdiction to consider his petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, relator’s petition is 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
§ 115.21 Evidence protocols and forensic medical examinations. ( a ) To the extent that the agency or facility is responsible for investigating allegations of sexual abuse involving detainees, it shall follow a uniform evidence protocol that maximizes the potential for obtaining usable physical evidence for administrative proceedings and criminal prosecutions. The protocol shall be developed in coordination with DHS and shall be developmentally appropriate for juveniles, where applicable.
( b ) The agency and each facility developing an evidence protocol referred to in paragraph (a) of this section, shall consider how best to utilize available community resources and services to provide valuable expertise and support in the areas of crisis intervention and counseling to most appropriately address victims' needs. Each facility shall establish procedures to make available, to the full extent possible, outside victim services following incidents of sexual abuse; the facility shall attempt to make available to the victim a victim advocate from a rape crisis center. If a rape crisis center is not available to provide victim advocate services, the agency shall provide these services by making available a qualified staff member from a community-based organization, or a qualified agency staff member. A qualified agency staff member or a qualified community-based staff member means an individual who has received education concerning sexual assault and forensic examination issues in general. The outside or internal victim advocate shall provide emotional support, crisis intervention, information, and referrals.
( c ) Where evidentiarily or medically appropriate, at no cost to the detainee, and only with the detainee's consent, the facility shall arrange for an alleged victim detainee to undergo a forensic medical examination by qualified health care personnel, including a Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner (SAFE) or Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) where practicable. If SAFEs or SANEs cannot be made available, the examination can be performed by other qualified health care personnel.
( d ) As requested by a victim, the presence of his or her outside or internal victim advocate, including any available victim advocacy services offered by a hospital conducting a forensic exam, shall be allowed for support during a forensic exam and investigatory interviews.
( e ) To the extent that the agency is not responsible for investigating allegations of sexual abuse, the agency or the facility shall request that the investigating agency follow the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section.
#### § 300.61 Federal elections (52 U.S.C. 30125(e)(1)(A)).

No person described in 11 CFR 300.60 shall solicit, receive, direct, transfer, spend, or disburse funds in connection with an election for Federal office, including funds for any Federal election activity as defined in 11 CFR 100.24, unless the amounts consist of Federal funds that are subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of the Act.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alfred C. Giammarino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ ALFRED C. GIAMMARINOAlfred C. Giammarino Chief Financial OfficerAugust 5, 2009


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Organization 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

# Office of Pipeline Safety Organization Chart

PHP-Org-Chart-March-24-2024.pdf (164.75 KB)

Pipeline Org Chart

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
#### § 81.49 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart establishes requirements for formulating and submitting petitions to request the Secretary to call a Secretarial election as required by the governing documents or charters of incorporation of tribes issued under the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA), 25 U.S.C. 476 and 477, as amended, and the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act (OIWA), 25 U.S.C. 503. This Subpart may also be used by a federally recognized tribe that is adopting a governing document, under Federal statute, for the first time.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 4

Authorizing the Clerk to inform the President of the election of the Speaker

and the Clerk.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Clerk to inform the President of the election

of the Speaker and the Clerk.

1 Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the

2 President of the United States that the House of Rep3 resentatives has elected J. Dennis Hastert, a Representa4 tive from the State of Illinois, Speaker; and Jeffrey J.

5 Trandahl, a citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia,

6 Clerk of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred

7 Sixth Congress.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2.1.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Foamex International Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Larney, Chief Financial Officer of Foamex International Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Foamex International Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Robert M. Larney

Robert M. Larney

Chief Financial Officer

April 17, 2008
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2021

No. 04-21-00042-CV

CITY OF FLORESVILLE, TEXAS, and Marissa Ximenez, Gloria E. Martinez, Juan Ortiz, 

Jade Jimenez, Gloria Morales Cantu, Monica Veliz, in their official capacities,

Appellants

v.

Nick NISSEN, David Johns, Paul W. Sack,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVW-19-00897

Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ brief was due on August 9, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). To date, no 

Appellees’ brief or motion for extension of time has been filed. 

If Appellees wish to file a brief in this appeal, Appellees are hereby ORDERED to file 

within TEN DAYS of the date of this order (1) Appellees’ brief and (2) a reasonable explanation 

for failing to timely file the brief. See id. R. 38.6(d). If Appellees wish the response to serve as a 

motion for extension of time, the response must comply with Rule 10.5(b)(1) of the Texas Rules 

of Appellate Procedure and the Fourth Court of Appeals’ local rules. See id. R. 10.5(b)(1); 4TH 

TEX. APP. (SAN ANTONIO) LOC. RS., http://www.txcourts.gov/4thcoa/practice-before-the-court/

local-rules.aspx.

If Appellees fail to file an adequate response within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, 

the appeal will be set for submission without Appellees’ brief. See Jackson v. Tex. Bd. of 

Pardons & Paroles, No. 01-03-00862-CV, 2008 WL 921035, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] Apr. 3, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“‘In a civil case, the court will accept as true the 

facts stated [in Appellant’s brief] unless another party contradicts them.’” (alteration in original) 

(quoting TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(g))). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 657 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 657

    Directing the Speaker to certify the report of the Committee on 
 Resources to the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2000

   Mr. Young of Alaska submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and withdrawn

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Directing the Speaker to certify the report of the Committee on 
 Resources to the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

    Resolved, That pursuant to sections 102 and 104 of the Revised 
Statutes of the United States (2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 192 and 194), the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives shall certify to the United 
States Attorney for the District of Columbia the report of the 
Committee on Resources detailing (1) the refusal of Mr. Henry M. Banta; 
Mr. Keith Rutter; and Ms. Danielle Brian Stockton to produce papers 
subpoenaed by the Committee on Resources and the refusal of each to 
answer questions while appearing under subpoena before the Subcommittee 
on Energy and Mineral Resources; (2) the refusal of the Project on 
Government Oversight, a corporation organized in the District of 
Columbia, to produce papers subpoenaed by the Committee on Resources; 
and (3) the refusal of Mr. Robert A. Berman to answer questions while 
appearing under subpoena before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral 
Resources, to the end that Mr. Henry M. Banta; Mr. Robert A. Berman; 
Mr. Keith Rutter; Ms. Danielle Brian Stockton; and the Project on 
Government Oversight be proceeded against in the manner and form 
provided by law.
                                 <all>
```
§ 115.164 Responder duties. ( a ) Upon learning of an allegation that a detainee was sexually abused, the first law enforcement staff member to respond to the report, or his or her supervisor, shall be required to: ( 1 ) Separate the alleged victim and abuser;
( 2 ) Preserve and protect, to the greatest extent possible, any crime scene until appropriate steps can be taken to collect any evidence;
( 3 ) If the sexual abuse occurred within a time period that still allows for the collection of physical evidence, request the alleged victim not to take any actions that could destroy physical evidence, including, as appropriate, washing, brushing teeth, changing clothes, urinating, defecating, smoking, drinking, or eating; and
( 4 ) If the abuse occurred within a time period that still allows for the collection of physical evidence, ensure that the alleged abuser does not take any actions that could destroy physical evidence, including, as appropriate, washing, brushing teeth, changing clothes, urinating, defecating, smoking, drinking, or eating.
( b ) If the first staff responder is not a law enforcement staff member, the responder shall be required to request that the alleged victim not take any actions that could destroy physical evidence and then notify law enforcement staff.
#### In re Brown.

Feb. 24, 1939.

HUBERT MEREDITH, Attorney General,’ for appellant.

Opinion by

Judge Stites

Confirming report of Board of Bar Commissioners.

This matter is before us for final judgment based on the findings and award of the Board of Commissioners of the Kentucky State Bar Association. The award recommends that the respondent, Louis F. Brown, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years.

After the report of the commissioners was filed in this court, a rule was issued and served on respondent to show cause, if any, why the award should not be enforced. Respondent has filed no exceptions to the report of the Board of Commissioners and no response to the rule.

We have examined the record and find nothing to indicate that respondent has not had an ample opportunity to present evidence in his own behalf, and it is manifest that the recommendation of the Board of Commissioners is supported by sufficient evidence.

It is therefore ordered that the report of the Board of Bar Commissioners be, and it is hereby, confirmed; and that the respondent, Louis F. Brown, be, and h„ is hereby, suspended from the practice of law in this state for the period of three years from this date.

Whole Court sitting.
§ 1.11 Fees. ( a ) The Commission shall not charge an individual for the costs of making a search for a record or the costs of reviewing the record. When the Commission makes a copy of a record as a necessary part of the process of disclosing the record to an individual, the Commission shall not charge the individual for the cost of making that copy.
( b ) If an individual requests the Commission to furnish a copy of the record, the Commission shall charge the individual for the costs of making the copy. The fee that the Commission has established for making a copy is ten cents ($.10) per page.
EXHIBIT
10.1








BUFFALO
WILD WINGS, INC.


2009
EXECUTIVE CASH INCENTIVE PROGRAM


FOR CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER








Our
executive cash incentive program for fiscal 2009 under the previously adopted
Cash Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the Chief Executive Officer was approved on
March 2, 2009 by the Board of Directors pursuant to a recommendation by the
Compensation Committee, which program is similar to the 2009 program adopted on
December 4, 2008 for the other executive officers.  The Plan is
designed to provide an annual incentive to executive officers based on the
achievement of certain financial objectives, as well as individual personal
objectives.  The financial objectives are set annually by our Board of
Directors.  Payments under the 2009 program for achievement of Company
financial objectives are based on the following: revenue, net income, same-store
sales increases, increase in the number of Company locations, and increase in
the number of franchise locations.





The Chief
Executive Officer may receive cash incentive payments of up to 122.6% of her
base salary for the Company achieving financial objectives and up to an
additional 22.6% of base salary on a discretionary basis for individual
performance as determined in the discretion of our Board of
Directors.  The level of the cash incentive amount payable based on
Company financial objectives varies depending upon the percentage of the
objective that we achieve.  If a certain minimum percentage for a
Company financial objective is not achieved, no payment is paid for that
objective.
#### LOWDER v. ALL STAR MILLS, INC.

No. 13P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 513

Petition by several defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed 7 February 1990.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Actuate Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof, the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 8, 2008                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                             
|/s/ Peter I. Cittadini                                                                                                       
|Peter I. Cittadini President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                       
|                                                                                                                             
|/s/ Daniel A. Gaudreau                                                                                                       
|Daniel A. Gaudreau Senior Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)