alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 1

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

RULE NUMBER: 904 DATE AMENDED: 4/20/05 

REGULATION TITLE: Trade Secrets - Procedure when Inspection is Requested 

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Attached/Not Attached*

 X COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE. If amended rule, indicate

changes in underline and strikeout format, compared to existing

approved SIP version.

 X REFERENCE TO OTHER RULES. If the rule contains a reference

to any other rule, attach a copy of that other rule unless it has already

been submitted to EPA as a part of a previous SIP submittal.

 X PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE. Include a copy of the newspaper

clipping certification with date of publication. Include a copy of

notice from each newspaper.

 X RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER. Must include Board Clerk

certification that hearing was held in accordance with information in

the public notice; must also include list of rules adopted or amended,

date of public hearing, and statement of compliance with H&SC

Sections 40725-40728 [Administrative Procedures Act].

 X PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Any written comments

submitted to the District during pubic notice period or at the hearing;

also include any written responses prepared by the District as normal

District procedure.
MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 2

OTHER INFORMATION

Attached/Not Attached

 X MODELING SUPPORT. Provide as appropriate; not required for

VOC and NOx rules; required where rule is a relaxation in an

attainment area for SO2, PM10, CO, or NOx [for NO2 purposes]; for

relaxation or shift of emissions in nonattainment area for SO2, PM10,

CO, and NOx, give reference to the approved SIP.

 X ECONOMIC/TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS

FROM EPA POLICIES: As appropriate, describe special

circumstances, i.e., where alternative RACT is used, extended

compliance dates included, etc.**

 X ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Any other supporting information,

such as staff reports, which are included with the rule package but not

specifically required in the checklist above.

-------------

* Attached separate sheet for each rule explaining why any materials are not included and when

they will be submitted to the ARB.

** Completed enforcement checklist will fulfill this requirement.
§ 75.1 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Band* means the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians in North Carolina.
( b ) *Reservation* means the lands of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians in the counties of Jackson, Swain, Graham, Cherokee and Haywood in North Carolina.
( c ) *Tribal Council* means the Tribal Council of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians in North Carolina.
( d ) *Announcement* means the announcement of the revision of the membership roll issued as required in § 75.3.
( e ) *Tribal Enrollment Office* means the Tribal Enrollment Clerk working in concert with the Enrollment Committee.
( f ) *Tribal Enrollment Clerk* means the individual working in the Tribal Enrollment Office.
( g ) *Enrollment Committee* means the three individuals appointed by the Tribal Council in accordance with § 75.12.
[24 FR 201, Jan. 8, 1959, as amended at 25 FR 2516, Mar. 25, 1960; 38 FR 9998, Apr. 23, 1973. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
Exhibit 13.2

GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

I, Salvi Rafael Folch Viadero, the Chief Financial Officer of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (the Company), hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2012



By:

/s/ Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoName: Salvi Rafael Folch Viadero Title:   Chief Financial Officer
-  LINC Training Library                  -  Guaranteed Underwriting System (GUS) 
              -  Lender Approval 
              -  Single Family Housing GLP Policy Desk 
              -  Lender Training 
              -  Loan Closing 
              -  Loan Origination 
              -  Loan Servicing 
              -  GUS Lender Test Environment (LTE) 
              -  SFHGLP System Access and Security Guide 
              -  *New* Lender Training Schedule 

                  - Spanish
                  - English

### Capacitación

**Nuevo**

Construccion Combinada de Prestamos Permanentes

Prestamo Combinado de Construccion a Permanente

### **Entrenamientos en vivo grabados**

**Ingresos y activos –**Webcast de enero de 2024 | Diapositivas con notas

**Construcción de cierre único -**Webcast de enero de 2024 | Diapositivas con notas

**Temas de actualidad: Préstamos GUS -**Webcast de diciembre de 2023 | Diapositivas con notas

**Requisitos de tasación y propiedad** - Webcast**de octubre de 2021** | Diapositivas con notas | Preguntas y respuestas

**Análisis crediticio –**Webcast de junio de 2022 | Diapositivas con notas

**Presentaciones exitosas de GUS -**Webcast de noviembre de 2022 | ****Diapositivas con notas

**Cambios en el manual y consejos importantes:**webcast de marzo de 2023 | Diapositivas con notas

**Amplíe su mercado con productos del USDA – junio de 2023** |****Diapositivas con notas

**Descripción general del programa 101 –**Webcast de noviembre de 2023****| ****Diapositivas con notas

###  Conceptos básicos del programa de préstamos

                    -  Conviértase en un prestamista aprobado
                    -  Reseña del programa
                    -  Términos, propósitos y restricciones del préstamo
                    -  Refinanciar préstamos

###  Elegibilidad del solicitante

                    -  Elegibilidad del solicitante
                    -  Ingresos anuales
                    -  Activos
                    -  Ingreso ajustado
                    -  Ingresos por reembolso
                    -  Analisis de CREDITO
                    -  Analisis de proporción

###  Elegibilidad de propiedad

                    -  Elegibilidad de propiedad
                    -  Tasaciones
                    -  Requisitos de depósito en garantía para viviendas y reparaciones existentes
                    -  Nueva construcción
                    -  Construcción combinada con préstamos permanentes
                    -  Combinación de construcción con préstamos permanentes: rehabilitación y reparación
                    -  Propiedades Especiales: Condominios y PUDs
                    -  Casas prefabricadas
                    -  Requisitos del sitio
                    -  Requisitos de propiedad
                    -  Requisitos ambientales y de inundaciones

###  Procesamiento y cierre de préstamos

                    -  Enviar un archivo completo
                    -  Compromiso condicional
                    -  Cerrar el préstamo
                    -  Garantía de nota de préstamo
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUFTIN 
f&l. kllllxm C. ww4um4. Page 8 

ha6 prtt6Oribtbd What t6 kiWWZt lie th6 cOl.WWlflcn rem ror the varmlll kinds or wEpunk*s, 

and th6 %36rtl Of 166lW8M6 &?lm1i66iOndi O? 

thir 8tate has. adopted thts tom fer rapartirlg purposuil. ,: 

"me Aotuup ~9 $I%0 bur4 or InuuraAoe 

Comlse:oners' Or 'thla'8teOu has for several 

ysam been a rambar or the ColaPittsa ?NJ n2.EUlkS 

of the Rational &mmlattosl b? Iaauranoe Cammi5lrioncrrs. It Is this Cconlttua whioh pro5Otib46 the rUrnUtd f&fita!tWh ltO5ZJd Cd ZQ6ke6i 

euah ahangs a6 are aeas66ary to fseet the x0- 

quirsaenW~ oi'ths bualn666 and. of the aherega 

i,~~,.nl;~ti the variouis WUte6 a6 they aTo ap- 

. 3&16 %4fSIitttrS, WhiQh IS COZL~O-4 

of the ACtUUldell O? ilft66n oi the Porty-aight 

Stat@8 49&t%XbtSilt8, lMB6tU ill &Nf YQrk t%tr 

the Latter part t-8 April 8aah y66r, an4 the 

ma-4 or fDeurenab C06&66ioneX6 or this Stat0 

believes It to be dietiincrtlf to'the int6?.6t 

of thiu state and 1te WPdl#Oi~U that t&s ACtLmxy ec the rwY%l or XAuux~e c%Ye?dtreiaMrtl 

~attenti l&l laaett.ryt or shlo Osrrclittee.* 

2%~ puipcas c&the p-6~3 tXl a6 autllm4 in 

your lsttar in doubtleoo 8t6te brtslu66a WI thin thu mating 

or uub-~~Xa(~ph (0) in the $enm'al ridor to 8MtUte 'L#n 

4a7 quot.64 in your letters hO11QVeX, it is Qur oplalon 

that the ~apoiwd trip OOZES6 within the lnhlbltloii 8(lplost 

the fwyl8Ont Of tlW8l.t~ 6XmtlSe6 %O tBttWid W&3&& 

fr 

(I 

oontaindl in the general rlEur of aa24 5. B. 4&T;, w 'oh 

madi a8 r0mwi8t 
WC, ragret tOlrtwe4 must declism to a3wOvo Bay- 

-at of tmvrllng exgsn6ea t0 attenU the owsthg Otztlins4 9.~2 y-cur luttm. 

APPROVEDFEB 29, 1940 

u---L 

ATTORNRY GENXRAL OF TEXAS
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-118369, 333-98331 and333-132995) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-123775, 333-102286,333-121133 and 333-127622) ofour report dated August 4, 2005 except for the restatementdescribed in Note 2 included in the 2005 Form 10K(Amendment No. 3) (not separately presented herein) to correctannual disclosures of earnings per share as described in Note 2to which the date is December 14, 2005 relating to theconsolidated financial statements of Terremark Worldwide, Inc., whichappears in this Form 10K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMiami, Florida
#### Oil Heat and Engineering, Inc. *v.*William A. Beckerman et al.

No appearance of counsel for either party.

Decided March *5,*1974

It appearing that the defendants in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the case be and hereby is dismissed.
#### § 100.114 Office building or facility for national party committees.

A payment, distribution, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value made by, or on behalf of, a national party committee for the purchase or construction of an office building or facility is an expenditure.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A1 39 6 . KALEEM J . RA-HASHI M et a l . v . U. S. BANK TRUST, N.A.

Th i s cas e o ri g in at ed as a d is p o s s es so ry act io n i n m a g i s t r a t e co u rt

. Aft er an ad v ers e ju d g m en t , Defen d an t s Kal eem J. R a

- H a shim a nd F onda H

. R a

- H a s hi m s o u g ht

rev i ew b efo re t h e s u p eri o r co urt

. Th e s u p eri or co u rt al s o r u l e d ag ai n st t h e RaHas hi m s , wh o t h en fi l ed t hi s d i rect ap p eal

. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i on

.

“ [A] p p eal s fro m d eci s i o n s o f t h e s u peri o r co u rt s rev i ewi n g d eci s io n s o f l o wer

co u rt s b y cert i orari o r de no v o p ro ceed i n g s sh al l b e by ap p l i cat i on fo r d i s cret i o n ary
ap p eal .” Bu l l o ck v. S

a n d
, 2 60 Ga. Ap p

. 8 7 4 , 8 75 (5 8 1 SE2 d 3 33 ) (2 0 03 ); s ee al s o OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ). Becau s e t h e Ra-Has h i m s di d n o t fo ll o w t h e pro p er p ro ced u re fo r req u es t i n g ap p el lat e rev i ew i n t h i s cas e, w e l ack ju ri s d ict i on o v er t h i s ap p eal
, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/31/2015 March 31, 2015
EXHIBIT 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-11299, No. 333-35287, No. 333-85575, No. 333-34320, No. 333-52804, No. 333-59158, No. 333-59160, No. 333-123452, No. 333-129269, No. 333-151771 and No. 333-166984) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Plan, the 1996 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan, the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, the GMS/Affymetrix 1998 Stock Plan, the Affymetrix/Neomorphic, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan of Affymetrix, Inc. and the ParAllele BioScience, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan of Affymetrix, Inc. of our reports dated February 28, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Affymetrix, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Affymetrix, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLPSan Jose, California

February 28, 2011
# C_2011030EN.01001401.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France), lodged on 15 October 2010 — Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon v Thomas Dutrueux, Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie du Jura

(Case C-495/10)

()

2011/C 30/21

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon

Appellant:

Respondents: Thomas Dutrueux, Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie du Jura

Respondents:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Having regard to the provisions of Article 13 thereof, does Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 (1) permit the implementation of a liability system based on the special situation of patients in public health establishments, in so far as it recognises, inter alia, that they have the right to obtain from such establishments, even in the absence of fault on the part of those establishments, compensation for injury caused by the failure of products and equipment which they use, without prejudice to the possibility for the establishment to seek indemnity from the producer? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Having regard to the provisions of Article 13 thereof, does Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 (1) permit the implementation of a liability system based on the special situation of patients in public health establishments, in so far as it recognises, inter alia, that they have the right to obtain from such establishments, even in the absence of fault on the part of those establishments, compensation for injury caused by the failure of products and equipment which they use, without prejudice to the possibility for the establishment to seek indemnity from the producer?

1

| 2. | Does Directive 85/374 limit the possibility for Member States to define the liability of persons who use defective equipment or products while providing services and, in so doing, cause damage to the recipient of those services? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Directive 85/374 limit the possibility for Member States to define the liability of persons who use defective equipment or products while providing services and, in so doing, cause damage to the recipient of those services?

---

(1)  Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products (OJ 1985 L 210, p. 29).

1

---
§ 2.101 Holding period. ( a ) Any live dog or cat acquired by a dealer[5] or exhibitor shall be held by him or her, under his or her supervision and control, for a period of not less than 5 full days, not including the day of acquisition, after acquiring the animal, excluding time in transit: *Provided, however:* ( 1 ) That any live dog or cat acquired by a dealer or exhibitor from any private or contract animal pound or shelter shall be held by that dealer or exhibitor under his or her supervision and control for a period of not less than 10 full days, not including the day of acquisition, after acquiring the animal, excluding time in transit;
( 2 ) Live dogs or cats which have completed a 5-day holding period with another dealer or exhibitor, or a 10-day holding period with another dealer or exhibitor if obtained from a private or contract shelter or pound, may be sold or otherwise disposed of by subsequent dealers or exhibitors after a minimum holding period of 24 hours by each subsequent dealer or exhibitor excluding time in transit;
( 3 ) Any dog or cat suffering from disease, emaciation, or injury may be destroyed by euthanasia prior to the completion of the holding period required by this section; and
( 4 ) Any live dog or cat, 120 days of age or less, that was obtained from the person that bred and raised such dog or cat, may be exempted from the 5-day holding requirement and may be disposed of by dealers or exhibitors after a minimum holding period of 24 hours, excluding time in transit. Each subsequent dealer or exhibitor must also hold each such dog or cat for a 24-hour period excluding time in transit.
( b ) During the period in which any dog or cat is being held as required by this section, the dog or cat shall be unloaded from any means of conveyance in which it was received, for food, water, and rest, and shall be handled, cared for, and treated in accordance with the standards set forth in part 3, subpart A, of this subchapter and § 2.131.
Footnotes -
2.101
[5] An operator of an auction sale is not considered to have acquired a dog or cat which is sold through the auction sale.
### §4a. Delegation of authority by Comptroller

The Comptroller of the Currency may delegate to any duly authorized employee, representative, or agent any power vested in the office by law.

(R.S. §327A, as added Pub. L. 96–221, title VII, §707(a), Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 188.)
### §§63, 64. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–230, §7, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 457

Section 63, R.S. §5151, related to individual liability of shareholders.

Section 64, act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §23, 38 Stat. 273, related to transfer of shares as affecting individual liability of shareholders. Limitation on liability of shareholders, see section 64a of this title.

The status of former section 63 of this title had been doubtful. At different times it had been held to have been repealed, superseded, and superseded only in part by former section 64 of this title which related to the same subject. See American T. Co. v. Grut, C.C.A. 1935, 80 F.2d 155; Miller v. Hamner, C.C.A. 1920, 269 F. 891; and First Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank, D.C. 1926, 14 F.2d 129.
# C_2010195EN.01001301.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/13

---

Action brought on 11 May 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-233/10)

2010/C 195/18

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Nienhuis and H. te Winkel)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/44/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of holdings in the financial sector, or in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/44/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of holdings in the financial sector, or in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of that directive;

1

| — | order Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of the Directive into national law expired on 20 March 2009.

---

(1)  OJ 2007 L 247, p. 1.

1

---
(40 South. 473.)

No. 15,947.

#### STATE v. SONIER.

(Jan. 29, 1906.)

Criminar Law — Appear—Record.

The proceedings which resulted in defendant’s conviction were regularly conducted, and defendant failed to bring up for review any ground upon which he can possibly obtain relief.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu; Edmund Dennis Miller, Judge.

Mallory Sonier was convicted of shooting with intent to kill, and appeals.

Affirmed.

Joseph Gilbert Fournet, for appellant. Walter Guión, Atty. Gen., and Leland I-Iugh Moss, Dist. Atty. (Lewis Guión, of counsel), for the State.

BREAUX, C. J.

An indictment was found against the defendant in this ease charging him, in due form, with having shot one Charles Rice with a pistol with intent to murder.

He waived arraignment, and pleaded not guilty.

He was tried. The jury by whom he was tried found him guilty of willfully and feloniously shooting with intent to' kill.

He was sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for 10 years.

The record does not show that a bill of exception was taken, no motion in arrest of judgment, no motion for a new trial made, nor any assignment of errors filed. There is nothing before us to review on appeal.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the verdict and sentence are affirmed.