alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 23—PERSONNEL; ENLISTED**

Sec.
2301.
Recruiting campaigns.
2302.
Enlistments; term, grade.
2303.
Promotion.
2304.
Compulsory retirement at age of sixty-two.
2305.
Voluntary retirement after thirty years' service.
2306.
Voluntary retirement after twenty years' service.
2307.
Retirement of enlisted members: increase in retired pay.
2308.
Recall to active duty during war or national emergency.
2309.
Recall to active duty with consent of member.
2310.
Relief of retired enlisted member promoted while on active duty.
2311.
Retirement in cases where higher grade or rating has been held.
2312.
Extension of enlistments.
2313.
Retention beyond term of enlistment in case of disability.
2314.
Detention beyond term of enlistment.
2315.
Inclusion of certain conditions in enlistment contract.
2316.
Discharge within three months before expiration of enlistment.
2317.
Aviation cadets; procurement; transfer.
2318.
Aviation cadets; benefits.
2319.
Critical skill training bonus.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior analysis for chapter 23 "COAST GUARD AUXILIARY" consisted of items 821 "Administration of the Coast Guard Auxiliary", 822 "Purpose of the Coast Guard Auxiliary", 823 "Eligibility; enrollments", 823a "Members of the Auxiliary; status", 824 "Disenrollment", 825 "Membership in other organizations", 826 "Use of member's facilities", 827 "Vessel deemed public vessel", 828 "Aircraft deemed public aircraft", 829 "Radio station deemed government station", 830 "Availability of appropriations", 831 "Assignment and performance of duties", and 832 "Injury or death in line of duty", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §113(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4221.

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §113(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4221, inserted chapter 23 designation and heading and added items 2301 to 2319.
### §3736. Precedence

(a) Reserve officers rank and take precedence in their respective grades among themselves and with officers of the same grade on the active duty promotion list and the permanent commissioned teaching staff in accordance with their dates of rank. When Reserve officers and officers on the active duty promotion list or the permanent commissioned teaching staff have the same date of rank in a grade, they take precedence as determined by the Secretary.

(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a Reserve officer shall not lose precedence when transferred to or from the active duty promotion list, nor shall that officer's date of rank be changed due to the transfer.

(c) A Reserve officer shall, when on the active duty promotion list, be promoted in the same manner as any other officer on the active duty promotion list regardless of the length of active duty service of the Reserve officer.

(d) Notwithstanding any other law, a Reserve officer shall not lose precedence by reason of promotion to the grade of rear admiral or rear admiral (lower half), if the promotion is determined in accordance with a running mate system.

(e) The Secretary shall adjust the date of rank of a Reserve officer so that no changes of precedence occur.

(Added Pub. L. 96–322, §1, Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1008, §725; amended Pub. L. 108–293, title II, §220(a), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1039; renumbered §3736, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §118(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 781 of this title prior to the complete revision of former chapter 21 of this title by Pub. L. 96–322.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 725 of this title as this section.

2004—Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 108–293 added subsecs. (d) and (e).
#### Kathleen Dapp et al. *v.*The Racebrook Realty Corporation et al.

*Charles G. Albom,*for the appellees (defendants).

*Irwin E. Friedman,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued May 7

decided May 7, 1974

The defendants’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted.

The plaintiffs’ motion for a review of the denial by the trial court to amend their request for a finding in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is dismissed as moot.

*Irwin E. Friedman,*in support of the motion.

Submitted April 15—decided May *1,*1974
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank**(the "Servicer" ). 

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing com p liance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229 .1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations ( the "CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2( ii ), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions" ).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori Eshoo 

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 12, 2015
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark S. Hall, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 750]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Michael E. Daley, J.), rendered June 24, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of vehicular manslaughter in the second degree (two counts) and driving while intoxicated. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed. Present—Kehoe, J.E, Martoche, Centra, Green and Pine, JJ.
#### Alexander Sutherland, Jr., et al. *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New Canaan et al.

*Jerroll R. Silverberg,*in support of the petition.

*Robert K. Lesser*and *Daniel D. McDonald,*in opposition.

Submitted March 19

decided April *2,*1974

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford is denied.
### §2742. Honorable subsequent service as condition to award

No medal of honor, Coast Guard cross, distinguished service medal, silver star medal, distinguished flying cross, Coast Guard medal, or emblem, or insignia in lieu thereof shall be awarded or presented to any individual, or to the representative of any individual, whose entire service subsequent to the time of the acts resulting in the consideration of such award shall not in the opinion of the Commandant have been honorable.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 536, §497; Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §13, 70A Stat. 624; Pub. L. 111–281, title II, §224(c)(3), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2922; renumbered §2742, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8506(g), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4752.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section makes honorable service subsequent to the act for which award is made, a condition precedent to granting the award. The Navy has the same statutory condition (see title 34, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §362). 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "of the acts resulting in the consideration of such award" for "he distinguished himself".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 497 of this title as this section.

2010—Pub. L. 111–281 substituted "Coast Guard cross, distinguished service medal, silver star medal, distinguished flying cross," for "distinguished service medal, distinguished flying cross,".

1956—Act Aug. 10, 1956, included the distinguished flying cross.
OMB Approval No. 2030-0020 

Approval Expires 4/30/12

Current and Pending Support 

The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Failure to provide this information

may delay consideration of this proposal.

Other agencies (including NSF) to which this proposal has been/will be submitted.

Investigator: 

Support: Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal:

Source of Support:

Total Award Amount: Total Award Period Covered: to

Location of Project:

Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal: Acad: Sumr: 

Support: Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal:

Source of Support:

Total Award Amount: Total Award Period Covered: to

Location of Project:

Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal: Acad: Sumr: 

Support: Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal:

Source of Support:

Total Award Amount: Total Award Period Covered: to

Location of Project:

Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal: Acad: Sumr: 

Support: Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal:

Source of Support:

Total Award Amount: Total Award Period Covered: to

Location of Project:

Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal: Acad: Sumr: 

Support: Current Pending Submission Planned in Near Future *Transfer of Support

Project/Proposal:

Source of Support:

Total Award Amount: Total Award Period Covered: to

Location of Project:

Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal: Acad: Sumr: 

*If this project has previously been funded by another agency, please list and furnish information for immediately preceding funding

period.

NCER FORM 5 (9/01) For Use with 

EPA STAR Grant Applications

USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY

United States

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Washington, DC 20460

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response. Send comments on the Agency's 

need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated 

collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. 

Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.
# C_2007096EN.01002401.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/24

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 March 2007 — Alecansan SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), CompUSA Management Co

(Case C-196/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Application for registration of a figurative mark - Opposition of the proprietor of an earlier national figurative mark - Likelihood of confusion - None - No similarity between the goods and services covered by the conflicting trade marks)

(2007/C 96/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Alecansan SL (represented by: P. Merino Baylos and A. Velázquez Ibáñez, abogados)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent), CompUSA Management Co

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 7 February 2006 in Case T-202/03 Alecansan v OHIM by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action brought by the proprietor of the national figurative mark ‘COMP USA ’in respect of goods in Class 39 for annulment of Decision R 711/2002-1 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2003 dismissing the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition lodged against the application for registration of the figurative Community trade mark ‘COMP USA ’in respect of goods in Classes 9 and 37 — Similarity between the marks — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

Alecansan

OHIM

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Alecansan SL shall bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Alecansan SL shall bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.

1

---
# C_2007082EN.01005602.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/56

---

Action brought on 7 February 2007 — Scozzaro v EMEA

(Case F-13/07)

(2007/C 82/119)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Salvatore Scozzaro (Broxbourne, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMEA)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 31 March 2006 by which the Executive Director of the EMEA refused the applicant's request for the establishment of an Invalidity Committee and the confirmatory decision of the following 25 October; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 31 March 2006 by which the Executive Director of the EMEA refused the applicant's request for the establishment of an Invalidity Committee and the confirmatory decision of the following 25 October;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

On 17 March 2005, the applicant, a member of the EMEA's temporary staff, fell victim to an accident at work, as a result of which he became incapable of carrying out his work. On 14 February 2006, he was informed that his contract would not be renewed beyond 15 October 2006. His request for the establishment of an Invalidity Committee was refused.

In support of his action, the applicant pleads, in particular, breach of the first paragraph of Article 31 and of Article 33(1) of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities (RAA), as interpreted by the Civil Service Tribunal in its judgment of 16 January 2007 in Case F-119/05 Gesner v OHIM (not yet reported in the ECR).

Gesner

OHIM

---
EXHIBIT  32.1

                            CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002
                            (18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of FTS Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report  for  the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2005  (the  "Form
10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.



Dated:  May  16,  2005



/s/  Scott  Gallagher
--------------------
Scott  Gallagher,  Chief  Executive  Officer



Dated:  May  16,  2005



/s/  Linda  Ehlen
-----------------
Linda  Ehlen,  Chief  Financial  Officer
#### Alice Judson, Respondent, v. John T. Mills, Jr., Appellant, Impleaded with Harriet A. R. Mills, Defendant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
NEWS: There are no Arizona Alerts at this time. 

**Arizona Rural Development State Office**230 N. First Ave, Suite 206Phoenix, AZ 85003Phone: 602-280-8701 | TDD: 602-280-8705

**Questions about Multifamily Housing Programs?**Call 1-800-292-8293

                          -    - State DirectorCharlene Fernandez (View Bio)
 
                          -                      View All State Contacts                   
                          -                        Follow the RD Arizona Office on X                     
                          -                        Receive Emails Through GovDelivery                     

## Rural Development Success Stories

### Health Care Closer to Home – It’s Good for the Heart

Read More

View All Success Stories

## Highlights and Announcements

                                -    Notice of Changes to Arizona Eligible Area Maps 
                                -    30 Day Public Inspection Period Opens on Review of Rural Areas in Arizona 
                                -    Notice of Potential Changes to Eligible Area Maps for Housing Programs 
                                -    Steps To Recovery 

### Featured Programs

                          -  Single Family Housing Direct Home Loans 
                          -  Water & Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Single Family Housing Repair Loans & Grants 
                          -  Business & Industry Loan Guarantees 
                          -  Community Facilities Direct Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Rural Energy for America Program Energy Audit & Renewable Energy Development Assistance Grants 
View All State Programs

### Resources

**Check Eligibility**Check a home, town or service location to verify eligibility for Rural Programs

**Manage your USDA Loan**You can create an account and manage your current loan through the Customer Service Center (CSC) portal. You can also contact the CSC at 800-414-1226
View All Resources

## Rural Development News

                                -  USDA Rural Development and Cocopah Tribe to Host Program Services Day on April 20, 2024Apr 10, 2024 
                                -  USDA Rural Development Leadership Visit PACE Project, Announce Clean Energy & Electrical Infrastructure Investments in Rural ArizonaMar 15, 2024 
                                -  Los Directores Estatales de USDA se Unen al Foro para Servicios del Programa y las Necesidades de la Comunidad con los Líderes Locales y las Partes InteresadasMar 13, 2024 
                                -  USDA State Directors Join Forum to Discuss Program Services, Community Needs with Local Leaders, StakeholdersMar 13, 2024 
                                -  USDA Invests $2.56 Million in Clean Energy and Domestic Fertilizer Projects to Strengthen Rural Arizona BusinessesJan 25, 2024 
                                -  $340 Thousand Awarded in Arizona from the Inflation Reduction Act to Increase Access to Clean, Affordable Domestic BiofuelsJan 19, 2024 

View All State News
Second Department,

February, 1908.

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph J. Cahill, Appellant.

Reargument ordered and case set down for Wednesday, March 4, 1908, Present — Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks, Gaynor and.Miller, JJ.
### §§981 to 987. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 981, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §31, 39 Stat. 382; June 3, 1935, ch. 164, §21, 49 Stat. 319, related to false statements in applications for loans. See section 1014 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Section 982, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §31, 39 Stat. 382, related to counterfeiting bonds or coupons. See section 493 of Title 18.

Section 983, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §31, 39 Stat. 382, related to charging or receiving unauthorized fees or commissions. See sections 216 and 1907 of Title 18.

Section 984, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §31, 39 Stat. 382, related to fraud and embezzlement. See sections 657 and 1006 of Title 18.

Section 985, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §31, 39 Stat. 382, related to false pretenses as to character of bonds or coupons. See section 1013 of Title 18.

Section 986, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §31, 39 Stat. 382, related to detection and arrest of violators. See section 3056 of Title 18.

Section 987, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §31 (par.), as added June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VII, §78, 48 Stat. 272, related to false statements by mortgagee. See section 1011 of Title 18.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00180-CV 

IN RE MARK BENNETT WISON RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-70560-431

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

motion for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency 

relief are denied.

/s/ Sue Walker

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 4, 2015

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
§ 1.3 Procedures for requests pertaining to individual records in a record system. ( a ) Any individual may request the Commission to inform him or her whether a particular record system named by the individual contains a record pertaining to him or her. The request may be made in person or in writing at the location and to the person specified in the notice describing that record system.
( b ) An individual who believes that the Commission maintains records pertaining to him or her but who cannot determine which record system contains those records, may request assistance either in person from the Chief Privacy Officer during the hours of 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. or by filing a request for assistance, addressed to the Chief Privacy Officer, pursuant to 11 CFR 100.19(g).
( c ) Requests under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be acknowledged by the Commission within 15 days from the date of receipt of the request. If the Commission is unable to locate the information requested under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section, it shall so notify the individual within 15 days after receipt of the request. Such acknowledgement may request additional information to assist the Commission in locating the record or it may advise the individual that no record or document exists about that individual.
[41 FR 43064, Sept. 29, 1976, as amended at 50 FR 50778, Dec. 12, 1985; 75 FR 31, Jan. 4, 2010; 82 FR 60852, Dec. 26, 2017; 89 FR 213, Jan. 2, 2024]