alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.4 Explicitly religious activities. ( a ) Organizations that receive direct financial assistance from DHS to participate in or administer any social service program may not use direct Federal financial assistance that it receives (including through a prime or sub-award) to support or engage in any explicitly religious activities (including activities that involve overt religious content such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization) or in any other manner prohibited by law.
( b ) Organizations receiving direct financial assistance from DHS for social service programs are free to engage in explicitly religious activities, but such activities must be offered separately, in time or location, from the programs or services funded with direct financial assistance from DHS, and participation must be voluntary for beneficiaries of the programs or services funded with such assistance.
( c ) All organizations that participate in DHS social service programs, including faith-based organizations, must carry out eligible activities in accordance with all program requirements, and in accordance with all other applicable requirements governing the conduct of DHS-funded activities, including those prohibiting the use of direct financial assistance from DHS to engage in explicitly religious activities, subject to any accommodations that are granted to organizations on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the Constitution and laws of the United States. No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or regulation that is used by DHS or a State or local government in administering financial assistance from DHS shall disqualify a faith-based organization from participating in DHS's social service programs because of such organization's religious character, motives, or affiliation, or lack thereof, or on the basis of conduct that would not be considered grounds to disqualify a similarly situated secular organization.
( d ) The use of indirect Federal financial assistance is not subject to the restriction in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section.
( e ) Nothing in this part restricts DHS's authority under applicable federal law to fund activities, such as the provision of chaplaincy services, that can be directly funded by the Government consistent with the Establishment Clause.
( f ) To the extent that any provision of this part is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Department intends for all other provisions that are capable of operating in the absence of the specific provision that has been invalidated to remain in effect.
[81 FR 19410, Apr. 4, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 82131, Dec. 17, 2020; 89 FR 15706, Mar. 4, 2024]
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA to Host Listening Sessions on Proposal to Improve and Maintain Rural 

Rental Housing and Keep Tenants in Their Homes

WASHINGTON, June 15, 2023 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA will host listening sessions on July 19 and July 25. 

USDA is seeking feedback on a proposal to make changes to programs that will help improve and maintain

rural rental housing and keep tenants in their homes. 

Currently, once an owner of a USDA-financed property pays off a Multifamily Housing Direct Loan or the 

mortgage is terminated, the property is no longer eligible to receive Multifamily Housing Rental Assistance.

The proposed changes would ensure tenants of USDA-financed properties continue to receive rental assistance 

after property owners pay off the loan or the loan is terminated. The changes would also encourage property 

owners to seek third-party financing to make property improvements. 

Stakeholders are invited to provide input on how these changes may impact policies, program requirements and 

operations under the Multifamily Housing Direct Loans and Multifamily Housing Rental Assistance programs.

All participants must register ahead of the sessions:

• July 19 at 2 p.m. ET 

Register: https://www.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_S8IV8KZ2TjKU-v231VIXhA 

• July 25 at 2 p.m. ET

Register: https://www.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_A7a3cdjgRy6D6xWguP24Qw

Stakeholders may also submit written comments to Decoupling@usda.gov. Comments are due by July 31, 

2023.

For more information, see pages 39219 and 39220 of the June 15 Federal Register.

To subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
John D. Belkin has petitioned the Court to waive the three-year test requirement for

the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) for purposes of applying

for admission by motion to the State Bar of Montana. By rule, applicants for admission by

motion must provide evidence of the requisite score on an MPRE taken "within three years

preceding the date of the application for admission." Rule IV.A.3, Rules of Adrnission.

Belkin passed the MPRE in 1998 when seeking admission to the practice of law in the State

of Colorado, where Belkin was admitted. Belkin has also admitted to the Wyoming Bar.

Belkin has practiced law continuously for 22 years, "without any ethical or disciplinary

violations in any jurisdiction where licensed or where admitted pro hac vice." Good cause

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of John D. Belkin to waive the

three-year test requirement for the MPRE for purposes of a current application for

adrnission by rnotion to the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and to the Administrator of

the Board of Bar Examiners at the State Bar of Montana.

p,s-J

DATED this z day of February, 2021.

Chief Justice
(A#4/f'''‘t4 ,#

Justices
EXHIBIT 12.1

                                                      Exhibit 12.1
  
                WALDEN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED
    FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS (2) (As Restated)
                      (Dollars in Thousands)
                                 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          For the Period
                                                        Year Ended       February 9, 1994
                                                       December 31,     (Commencement of
                                                     ----------------  Operations) through
                                                     1996        1995   December 31, 1994
                                                     ----        ----  -------------------
<S>                                                <C>         <C>          <C>
Income before extraordinary item
  and minority interests . . . . . . . . . .       $19,122     $10,685      $ 5,356
Add:
   Interest on indebtedness. . . . . . . . .        20,573      17,111        6,288
   Amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           916         900          371
                                                   -------     -------      -------
     Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $40,611     $28,696      $12,015
                                                   =======     =======      =======
Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends:
   Interest on indebtedness. . . . . . . . .       $20,573     $17,111      $ 6,288
   Amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           916         900          371
                                                   -------     -------      -------
     Fixed charges . . . . . . . . . . . . .        21,489      18,011        6,659
   Add:
     Preferred stock dividends (1) . . . . .         4,092         922          --
                                                   -------     -------      -------
        Combined fixed charges and
          preferred stock dividends. . . . .       $25,581     $18,933      $ 6,659
                                                   =======     =======      =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges . . . . .         1.89x       1.59x        1.80x
  
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
  preferred stock dividends. . . . . . . . .         1.59x       1.52x        1.80x
</TABLE>
  
(1)   Includes dividends on minority interest securities and preferred stock.
  
(2)   Computation of the ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
      and preferred stock dividends has not been provided for Walden
      Predecessors because the capital structure has changed
      substantially since the Company's formation and the
      information relating to Walden Predecessors would be
      meaningless.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.92 What should the Indian tribe or tribal organization do if it wants contractor-purchased real property to be taken into trust?

The contractor shall submit a resolution of support from the governing body of the Indian tribe in which the beneficial ownership is to be registered. If the request to take contractor-purchased real property into trust is submitted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, that Secretary shall transfer the request to the Secretary of the Interior. The Secretary of the Interior shall expeditiously process all requests in accord with applicable Federal law and regulation.
### §3421. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title III, §3001(d), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 734

Section, Pub. L. 95–630, title XI, §1121, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3710, related to reporting requirements.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 1]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ001.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 3]]

Public Law 110-1
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 
  Vermont as the ``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation 
              Area''. <<NOTE: Jan. 17, 2007 -  [S. 159]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 16 USC 460nn-1 note.>> ROBERT T. STAFFORD WHITE ROCKS 
            NATIONAL RECREATION AREA.

    (a) Redesignation.--The White Rocks National Recreation Area in the 
State of Vermont, as established by section 202 of the Vermont 
Wilderness Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 460nn-1), is redesignated as the 
``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area''.
    (b) <<NOTE: 16 USC 460nn, 460nn-1, 460nn-3.>> References.--Any 
reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 
the United States to the recreation area referred to in subsection (a) 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Robert T. Stafford White Rocks 
National Recreation Area.

    Approved January 17, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 159:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Jan. 4, considered and passed Senate.
            Jan. 5, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 9008.55 Funding for convention committees, host committees and municipal funds. ( a ) Convention committees, including any established pursuant to 11 CFR 9008.3(a)(2), are subject to 11 CFR 300.10, except that convention committees may accept in-kind donations from host committees and municipal funds provided that the in-kind donations are in accordance with the requirements of 11 CFR 9008.52 and 9008.53.
( b ) Host committees and municipal funds are not “agents” of national committees of political parties or convention committees, unless they satisfy the prerequisites of 11 CFR 300.2(b)(1).
( c ) Host committees and municipal funds are not “directly or indirectly established, financed, maintained, or controlled” by national committees of political parties or convention committees, unless they satisfy the prerequisites of 11 CFR 300.2(c).
( d ) In accordance with 52 U.S.C. 30125(e)(4)(A), a person described in 11 CFR 300.60 may make a general solicitation of funds, without regard to source or amount limitation, for or on behalf of any host committee or municipal fund that is described in 26 U.S.C. 501(c) and exempt from taxation under 26 U.S.C. 501(a) (or has submitted an application for determination of tax exempt status under such section) where such solicitation does not specify how the funds will or should be spent.
[68 FR 47418, Aug. 8, 2003, as amended at 79 FR 77851, Dec. 29, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.190 Is FTCA the exclusive remedy for a tort claim for personal injury or death resulting from the performance of a self-determination contract?

Yes, except as explained in § 900.183(b). No claim may be filed against a self-determination contractor or employee for personal injury or death arising from the performance of medical, surgical, dental, or related functions by the contractor in carrying out self-determination contracts under the Act. Related functions include services such as those provided by nurses, laboratory and x-ray technicians, emergency medical technicians and other health care providers including psychologists and social workers. All such claims shall be filed against the United States and are subject to the limitations and restrictions of the FTCA.
#### § 81.8 What happens if a governing Federal statute and this part disagree?

If a conflict appears to exist between this part and a specific requirement of the Federal statute, this part must be interpreted to conform to the statute.
§ 42.7 What does due process in a formal disciplinary proceeding include? Due process must include written notice of the charges and a fair and impartial hearing as required by this section. ( a ) The school must give the student written notice of charges within a reasonable time before the hearing required by paragraph (b) of this section. Notice of the charges includes: ( 1 ) A copy of the school policy allegedly violated;
( 2 ) The facts related to the alleged violation;
( 3 ) Information about any statements that the school has received relating to the charge and instructions on how to obtain copies of those statements; and
( 4 ) Information regarding those parts of the student's record that the school will consider in rendering a disciplinary decision.
( b ) The school must hold a fair and impartial hearing before imposing disciplinary action, except under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) If the Act requires immediate removal (such as, if the student brought a firearm to school) or if there is some other statutory basis for removal;
( 2 ) In an emergency situation that seriously and immediately endangers the health or safety of the student or others; or
( 3 ) If the student (or the student's parent or guardian if the student is less than 18 years old) chooses to waive entitlement to a hearing.
( c ) In an emergency situation under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the school: ( 1 ) May temporarily remove the student;
( 2 ) Must immediately document for the record the facts giving rise to the emergency; and
( 3 ) Must afford the student a hearing that follows due process, as set forth in this part, within ten days.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 1 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 2 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion ma y contain computer-generated errors or other 3 deviations from the official paper version file d by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 4 filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 CONSUELO ANGELA YSAIS (n/k/a LEYBA), 7 Petitioner-Appellee, 8

v. NO. 29,915 9 CHRISTOPHER YSAIS, 10 Respondent-Appellant. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 12 Matthew G. Reynolds, District Judge 13 Consuelo Angela Ysais 14 Rio Rancho, NM 15 for Appellee 16 Christopher Ysais 17 Rio Rancho, NM 18 for Appellant 19

MEMORANDUM OPINION 20 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 21 Father, pro se, appeals from the child custody order filed on August 26, 2009, 22 granting sole custody of the child to Mother, and granting visitation rights to Father. 232 We proposed to affirm in a calendar notice. Father responded to that notice with a 1 memorandum in opposition. We have carefu lly reviewed Father’s arguments, but we 2 are not persuaded that affirmance is not the correct disposition in this case. We 3 therefore affirm. 4 Father repeats the claims that were included in his docketing statement. In 5 summary calendar cases, such as this, th e party who opposes the proposed disposition 6 set out in the calendar notice has the burden of clearly pointing out errors in fact or 7 law in that proposed disposition. See Hennessy v. Duryea , 1998-NMCA-036, ¶ 24, 8 124 N.M. 754, 955 P.2d 683; see also State v. Ibarra , 116 N.M. 486, 489, 864 P.2d 9 302, 305 (Ct. App. 1993); State v. Sisneros , 98 N.M. 201, 202-03, 647 P.2d 403, 404- 10 05 (1982). Father has not met that burden. Instead, Father repeats the arguments 11 previously made; the arguments that were fully addressed in our calendar notice. 12 Therefore, for the reasons discussed in our calendar notice, we affirm the 13 district court’s decision. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED

. 15 16 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 17 WE CONCUR: 18

19 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 203 1 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 2
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Ronald Williams, Appellant, v Warden of Rikers Island Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 671]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), entered June 16, 2005, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

We have considered and rejected the arguments raised in petitioner’s pro se supplemental submissions. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
### [§2366. Renumbered §4172]
### Age and structural significance of ophiolite and adjoining rocks in the upper Chulitna District, south-central Alaska

By: David Lawrence JonesNorman J. SilberlingBela CsejteyW. H. NelsonC.D. Blome

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1121A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Interpretive bedrock geologic map of part of the Upper Chulitna District, Healy A-6 Quadrangle, Alaska Range, Alaska(1978)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Allen *v.*Allen.

[No. 12,286.

Filed April 23, 1925.]

*Appeal.—Appellant’s brief must present, the errors for review so they can be determined without resort to the*record.—The action of the court in ruling on a demurrer to a pleading is not presented for review if the pleading is not set out in appellant’s brief, as an appellant must so prepare his brief that the questions sought to be presented can be determined without resort to the record.

From Vigo Superior Court; *William T. Gleason,*Judge.

*21Action by Grace B. Allen against Milton Allen. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. *Affirmed.*By the second division.

*Reichman & Douglas,*for appellant.

*A. Z. Thomas*and *J. T. Walker,*for appellee.

Nichols, J.

Action by appellee to enjoin appellant from diverting water falling on his land from a natural watercourse, and casting upon the land of appellee. The only error assigned is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s demurrer to appellee’s reply to the second paragraph of answer. Appellant has failed to set out the reply and the demurrer thereto. Appellant must so prepare his brief that the questions sought to be presented therein can be determined without resort to the record. *Pugh, Admr.,*v. *Cleveland, etc., R. Co.*(1915), 184 Ind. 350, 110 N. E. 193; *Whipple*v. *Cain*(1920), 73 Ind. App. 285, 127 N. E. 283.

Nothing is presented.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 11 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 600
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 11

                    For the relief of Wei Jingsheng.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

   Mr. Abraham (for himself, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Helms, Mr. Allard, Mr. 
  Feingold, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
Hutchinson, and Mr. Roth) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             June 15, 2000

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Wei Jingsheng.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Wei Jingsheng 
Freedom of Conscience Act''.
    (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Wei Jingsheng 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Wei Jingsheng as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by one during the current fiscal year the total 
number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the 
alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

                                                       Calendar No. 600

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 11

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                    For the relief of Wei Jingsheng.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 15, 2000

                       Reported without amendment
```