11462 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Notices 

TABLE 2 —REGISTRANTS OF CANCELLED PRODUCTS

EPA company No. Company name and address 

4 .................................... Bonide Products, Inc., Agent Registrations By Design, Inc., P.O. Box 1019, Salem, VA 24153–3805. 

352 ................................ E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., Inc. (S300/419), 1007 Market Street, Wilmington, DE 19898–0001. 

498 ................................ Chase Products Co., P.O. Box 70, Maywood, IL 60153. 

2915 .............................. The Fuller Brush Company, One Fuller Way, Great Bend, KS 67530. 

3862 .............................. ABC Compounding Co, Inc., P.O. Box 16247, Atlanta, GA 30321. 

8842 .............................. Fumakilla Ltd., 1330 Dillon Heights Ave, Baltimore, MD 21228–1199. 

9198 .............................. The Anderson’s Lawn Fertilizer Division, Inc., P.O. Box 119, Maumee, OH 43537. 

44446 ............................ Quest Chemical Company, 12255 F.M., 529 Northwoods Industrial Park, Houston, TX 77041. 

45188 ............................ Harrison Specialty Co., Inc., 15 University-P.O. Box H, Canton, MA 02021. 

50534 ............................ GB Biosciences Corporation, 410 Swing Rd., P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419–5458. 

53883 ............................ Control Solutions, Inc., 427 Hide Away Circle, Cub Run, KY 42729. 

64240 ............................ Combat Insect Control Systems, 122 C Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20001. 

66330 ............................ Arysta Lifescience North America, LLC, 155401 Weston Parkway, Suite 150, Cary, NC 27513. 

84456 ............................ Hebei Veyong Bio-Chemical Co., Ltd., Agent Wagner Regulatory Associates, Inc., 4760 Lancaster Pike, Suite 9, P.O. 

Box 640, Hockessin, DE 19707–0640. 

84538 ............................ Sathaporn Marketing Company, Ltd., 1330 Dillon Heights Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21228–1199. 

85678 ............................ RedEagle International LLC, Agent Wagner Regulatory Associates, Inc., 4760 Lancaster Pike, Suite 9, P.O. Box 640, 

Hockessin, DE 19707–0640. 

CA900010; CA910030 .. Wilbur Ellis Company, P.O. Box 1286, Fresno, CA 93715. 

FL890033 KY030003; 

KY030004; 

TX040007; 

WA060003.

Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., ATTN: Regulatory Affairs, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419–8300. 

OR910028 ..................... AMVAC Chemical Corporation, D/B/A AMVAC, 4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 1250, Newport Beach, CA 92660–1706. 

WA070003 .................... Gowan Company, P.O. Box 5569, Yuma, AZ 85336–5569. 

III. Summary of Public Comments 

Received and Agency Response to 

Comments 

During the public comment period 

provided, EPA received no comments in 

response to the August 4, 2010 Federal 

Register notice announcing the 

Agency’s receipt of the requests for 

voluntary cancellations of products 

listed in Table 1 of Unit II. 

IV. Cancellation Order 

Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f), EPA 

hereby approves the requested 

cancellations of the registrations 

identified in Table 1 of Unit II. 

Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders 

that the product registrations identified 

in Table 1 of Unit II are canceled. The 

effective date of the cancellations that 

are subject of this notice is March 2, 

2011. Any distribution, sale, or use of 

existing stocks of the products 

identified in Table 1 of Unit II. in a 

manner inconsistent with any of the 

provisions for disposition of existing 

stocks set forth in Unit VI. will be a 

violation of FIFRA. 

V. What is the Agency’s authority for 

taking this action? 

Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA provides that 

a registrant of a pesticide product may 

at any time request that any of its 

pesticide registrations be canceled or 

amended to terminate one or more uses. 

FIFRA further provides that, before 

acting on the request, EPA must publish 

a notice of receipt of any such request 

in the Federal Register. Thereafter, 

following the public comment period, 

the EPA Administrator may approve 

such a request. The notice of receipt for 

this action was published for comment 

in the Federal Register issue of August 

4, 2010 (75 FR 46932) (FRL–8837–9). 

The comment period closed on January 

31, 2011. 

VI. Provisions for Disposition of 

Existing Stocks 

Existing stocks are those stocks of 

registered pesticide products which are 

currently in the United States and 

which were packaged, labeled, and 

released for shipment prior to the 

effective date of the cancellation action. 

The existing stocks provisions for the 

products subject to this order are as 

follows. 

The registrants may continue to sell 

and distribute existing stocks of 

products listed in Table 1 of Unit II. 

until [insert date 1 year after publication 

of the Cancellation Order], which is 1 

year after the publication of the 

Cancellation Order in the Federal 

Register Thereafter, the registrants are 

prohibited from selling or distributing 

products listed in Table 1, except for 

export in accordance with FIFRA 

section 17, or proper disposal. Persons 

other than the registrants may sell, 

distribute, or use existing stocks of 

products listed in Table 1 of Unit II. 

until existing stocks are exhausted, 

provided that such sale, distribution, or 

use is consistent with the terms of the 

previously approved labeling on, or that 

accompanied, the canceled products. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Pesticides 

and pests. 

Dated: February 24, 2011. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4656 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[CG Docket No. 10–51; DA 11–317] 

Consumer and Governmental Affairs 

Bureau Seeks Comment on 

Application of New and Emerging 

Technologies for Video Relay Service 

Use 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Commission seeks comment regarding 

new and emerging technologies that 

may be used to access Video Relay 

Service (VRS). With the proliferation of 

access to VRS through mobile 

technologies, the Commission has an 

interest in gathering information about 

use of these technologies in compliance 

with the Commission’s rules. Comments 

received in response to this document 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Notices 11463 

will supplement the comments received 

in response to the VRS Structure and 

Practices Notice of Inquiry (VRS 

Structure and Practices NOI), and will 

be incorporated into the record of that 

proceeding. 

DATES: Comments are due April 1, 2011. 

Reply comments are due April 18, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: FCC Headquarters at 445 

12th Street, SW., Room TW–A325, 

Washington, DC 20554. You may submit 

comments, identified by [CG Docket No. 

10–51], by any of the following 

methods: 

• Electronic Filers: Comments may be 

filed electronically using the Internet by 

accessing the Commission’s Electronic 

Comment Filing System (ECFS) http:// 

fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/ or the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Filers should 

follow the instructions provided on the 

Web site for submitting comments and 

transmit one electronic copy of the 

filing to each docket number referenced 

in the caption, which in this case is CG 

Docket No. 10–51. For ECFS filers, in 

completing the transmittal screen, filers 

should include their full name, U.S. 

Postal Service mailing address, and the 

applicable docket number. 

• Parties may also submit an 

electronic comment by Internet e-mail. 

To get filing instructions, filers should 

send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and 

include the following words in the body 

of the message, ‘‘get form {your e-mail 

address}. A sample form and directions 

will be sent in response. 

• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to 

file by paper must file an original and 

four copies of each filing. In addition, 

parties must send one copy to the 

Commission’s duplicating contractor, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, or 

via e-mail to fcc@bcpiweb.com. Filings 

can be sent by hand or messenger 

delivery, by commercial overnight 

courier, or by first-class or overnight 

U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings 

must be addressed to the Commission’s 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary, 

Federal Communications Commission. 

• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the 

Commission’s Secretary must be 

delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 

12th Street, SW., Room TW–A325, 

Washington, DC 20554. All hand 

deliveries must be held together with 

rubber bands or fasteners. 

• Envelopes must be disposed of 

before entering the building. The filing 

hours are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. 

• Commercial overnight mail (other 

than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail 

and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 

East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, 

MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service firstclass, Express, and Priority mail must be 

addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Diane Mason, Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability 

Rights Office, at (202) 418–7126 or 

Diane.Mason@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s 

Consumer and Governmental Affairs 

Bureau Seeks Comment on Application 

of New and Emerging Technologies for 

Video Relay Service Use, Public Notice, 

document DA 11–317, released on 

February 17, 2011, in CG Docket No. 

10–51. 

The full text of document DA 11–317 

and copies of any subsequently filed 

documents in this matter will be 

available for public inspection and 

copying via ECFS, and during regular 

business hours at the FCC Reference 

Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room CY–A257, 

Washington, DC 20554. They may also 

be purchased from the Commission’s 

duplicating contractor, Best Copy and 

Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, 

SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 

20554, telephone: (800) 378–3160, fax: 

(202) 488–5563, or Internet: http:// 

www.bcpiweb.com. Document DA 

11–317 can also be downloaded in 

Word or Portable Document Format 

(PDF) at http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy. 

To request materials in accessible 

formats for people with disabilities 

(Braille, large print, electronic files, 

audio format), send an e-mail to 

fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer 

and Governmental Affairs Bureau at 

202–418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 

(TTY). 

In the VRS Structure and Practices 

NOI, the Commission designated the ex 

parte status of the proceeding as 

‘‘permit-but-disclose,’’ so any 

presentations related to document DA 

11–317 will also be designated as such. 

Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.1200 et. seq., this 

matter shall be treated as a ‘‘permit-butdisclose’’ proceeding in accordance with 

the Commission’s ex parte rules. 

Persons making oral ex parte 

presentations are reminded that 

memoranda summarizing the 

presentations must contain summaries 

of the substance of the presentations 

and not merely a listing of the subjects 

discussed. More than a one or two 

sentence description of the views and 

arguments presented is generally 

required. Other rules pertaining to oral 

and written ex parte presentations in 

permit-but-disclose proceedings are set 

forth in 47 CFR 1.1206(b). 

Synopsis 

As part of ongoing VRS reform efforts 

associated with the VRS Structure and 

Practices NOI, the Bureau seeks 

additional comment and information 

regarding new and emerging 

technologies that may be used to access 

VRS. See Structure and Practices of the 

Video Relay Service Program, Notice of 

Inquiry, published at 75 FR 41863, July 

19, 2010. In the VRS Structure and 

Practices NOI, the Commission sought 

comment on how to improve the VRS 

program ‘‘to ensure that it is available to 

and used by the full spectrum of eligible 

users, encourages innovation, and is 

provided efficiently so as to be less 

susceptible to the waste, fraud, and 

abuse that plague the current program 

and threaten its long-term viability.’’ 

The NOI also sought comment on a 

number of issues concerning the 

provision of off-the-shelf video 

equipment, including the extent to 

which such equipment is available and 

affordable to VRS consumers, the extent 

to which this equipment can serve as an 

acceptable substitute for videophone 

equipment and software specifically 

designed for VRS users, and the extent 

to which changes in the VRS program 

are needed to allow consumers to use 

such equipment for VRS calls. Given the 

recent proliferation of these video 

technologies, the Bureau now requests 

that interested parties provide 

additional information and comment on 

the specific functionalities of these 

devices as they relate to the provision 

and use of VRS as follows: 

• What specific features or functions 

of off-the-shelf equipment, services, and 

software are needed to effectively use 

VRS? Commenters should specify 

whether each feature or function is 

necessary to use VRS and point-to-point 

communications or could be optional. 

What broadband speeds and frames-persecond transmission rates are necessary 

for acceptable video quality? What lux 

(lx) level ratings are required for a 

camera to produce acceptable images in 

low light settings? What other features 

must a camera have (e.g., pan, zoom, 

tilt)? How much jitter (lateral and 

angular) is tolerable? 

• To what extent are consumers 

currently using off-the-shelf video 

communication software and/or 

platforms in connection with VRS? How 

often do consumers use these 

technologies (e.g., Skype, Apple 

FaceTime) as compared to equipment 

and software issued by VRS providers 

for point-to-point communications? 

What are the advantages and 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
11464 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Notices 

disadvantages of the off-the-shelf 

technologies compared to technologies 

provided by VRS-providers? For 

example, are there specific 

functionalities—for either VRS or pointto-point communications—that these 

technologies offer that are not available 

on devices issued by providers? What 

are the current limitations of such 

technologies (e.g., with respect to 

interoperability, numbering, emergency 

services) and to what extent do such 

limitations impede their use by persons 

who rely on VRS? Do such off-the-shelf 

technologies comply with the 

Commission’s current rules? If they do 

not comply, in what ways do they not 

comply? 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Karen Peltz Strauss, 

Deputy Bureau Chief, Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4646 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting; Open 

Commission Meeting; Thursday, March 

3, 2011 

February 24, 2011. 

The Federal Communications 

Commission will hold an Open Meeting 

on the subjects listed below on 

Thursday, March 3, 2011, in Room TW– 

C305, at 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC. 

The Commission will hear Item Nos. 

1 thru 3 in a morning session from 10 

a.m. to 12 p.m. An afternoon session 

featuring Item Nos. 4 thru 7 will 

commence at 2 p.m. 

Item 

No. Bureau Subject 

1 Media .............................................................. Title: Policies to Promote Rural Radio Service and to Streamline Allotment and Assignment Procedures (MB Docket No. 09–52; RM–11528). 

Summary: The Commission will consider an Order to revise rules or establish waiver 

standards that will make it easier for Native Nations to provide radio service to areas 

that are the functional equivalent of Tribal Lands and to Tribal Lands that are small or 

irregularly shaped; and to adjust policies for determining whether proposed new radio 

stations or station moves constitute an equitable distribution of radio service under Section 307(b) of the Communications Act. A Further Notice seeks comment on adopting a 

Tribal eligibility requirement or a Tribal bidding credit to foster radio service by Native 

Nations on their lands. 

2 Wireless Telecommunications ....................... Title: Improving Communications Services for Native Nations by Promoting Greater Utilization of Spectrum Over Tribal Lands. 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to explore a 

range of recommendations to help close the wireless gap on Tribal Lands. 

3 Consumer & Governmental Affairs ................ Title: Improving Communications Services for Native Nations. 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Inquiry that explores ways to overcome the barriers to deployment of communications services to Native Nations communities, and to improve consultation and coordination with Native Nations. 

* * * ............................................................... Break * * *. 

4 Media .............................................................. Title: Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Related to Retransmission Consent (MB 

Docket No. 10–71). 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that seeks 

comment on changes to rules governing or affecting retransmission consent negotiations between broadcasters and multichannel video programming distributors. 

5 Wireline Competition ...................................... Title: Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96–45); Lifeline and 

Link Up (WC Docket No. 03–109); Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization. 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to reform and 

modernize the universal service Lifeline and Link Up programs by eliminating waste, 

fraud, and abuse; improving program administration, accountability, and fiscal responsibility; and updating the program in light of market and technology changes, including to 

support pilot programs for broadband adoption. 

6 Wireless Telecommunications and Consumer 

& Governmental Affairs.

Title: Implementation of Sections 716 and 717 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 

(CG Docket No. 10–213); Amendments to the Commission’s rules implementing Sections 255 and 251(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (WT Docket No. 96–198) and Accessible Mobile Phone 

Options for People who are Blind, Deaf-Blind, or Have Low Vision (CG Docket No. 10– 

145). 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that seeks 

comment on rules implementing provisions of the Twenty-First Century Communications 

and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA). The NPRM proposes rules requiring providers of advanced communications services and manufacturers of equipment used for 

those services to make their products accessible to people with disabilities. 

7 Media .............................................................. Title: Video Description: Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and 

Video Accessibility Act of 2010. 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to reinstate 

the video description rules adopted by the Commission in 2000, as directed in the 

CVAA. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES