alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006326EN.01004402.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/44

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 17 November 2006 — Nadine Paquay v Société d'architectes Hoet + Minne SPRL

(Case C-460/06)

(2006/C 326/90)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nadine Paquay

Applicant:

Defendant: Société d'architectes Hoet + Minne SPRL

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 10 of Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (1) be interpreted as only prohibiting the notification of a decision of dismissal during the period of protection referred to in paragraph 1 of that article or does it also prohibit taking a decision of dismissal and attempting to find a permanent replacement for the employee before the end of the period of protection? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 10 of Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (1) be interpreted as only prohibiting the notification of a decision of dismissal during the period of protection referred to in paragraph 1 of that article or does it also prohibit taking a decision of dismissal and attempting to find a permanent replacement for the employee before the end of the period of protection?

1

| 2. | Is dismissal notified after the period of protection provided for in Article 10 of Directive 92/85, but which is not unrelated to the pregnancy and/or the birth of a child, contrary to Article 2(1) (or 5(1)) of Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (2), and, in such a case, must the sanction be at least equivalent to that laid down by national law in execution of Article 10 of Directive 92/85? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is dismissal notified after the period of protection provided for in Article 10 of Directive 92/85, but which is not unrelated to the pregnancy and/or the birth of a child, contrary to Article 2(1) (or 5(1)) of Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (2), and, in such a case, must the sanction be at least equivalent to that laid down by national law in execution of Article 10 of Directive 92/85?

2

---

(1)  OJ L 348, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 39, p. 40.

2

---
Exhibit 14.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-111779) and the
Registration Statement on Form F-4/A (No. 333-112948) of Millicom International Cellular S.A. of our report dated June 4, 2004 relating to the financial
statements of Telefònica Celular, S.A., which appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Millicom International Cellular S.A. for the year ended
December 31, 2003. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the registration Statement on Form F-4/A (No. 333-112948) of
Millicom International Cellular S.A.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
Interamérica, S. de R. L.- Honduras
January 11, 2005

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 24.1



                           POWER OF ATTORNEY





     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below (hereinafter individually and collectively referred to as
the "grantor") constitutes and appoints Lawrence Flinn, Jr., David P.
Beddow and/or Peter C. Boylan, III, and each of them, the grantor's
attorney(s)-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for grantor in
any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
United Video Satellite Group, Inc. for its fiscal year ended December
31, 1996, and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents required or appropriate in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; granting unto
said attorney(s)-in-fact full power and authority to perform any other
act on behalf of the grantor required to be done in the premises,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney(s)-in-fact may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





     Date:  March 13, 1997               /s/ Lawrence Flinn, Jr.
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Lawrence Flinn, Jr.



     Date:  March 26, 1997               /s/ David P. Beddow
                                     ------------------------------
                                     David P. Beddow



     Date:  March 12, 1997               /s/ Peter C. Boylan, III
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Peter C. Boylan, III



     Date:  March 14, 1997               /s/ William J. Bresnan
                                     ------------------------------
                                     William J. Bresnan




     Date:  March 14, 1997               /s/ Donne F. Fisher
                                     -----------------------------
                                     Donne F. Fisher



     Date:  March 14, 1997               /s/ Paul A. Gould
                                     -----------------------------
                                     Paul A. Gould



     Date:  March 25, 1997               /s/ Camille K. Jayne
                                     -----------------------------
                                     Camille K. Jayne




     Date:  March 26, 1997               /s/ Larry E. Romrell
                                     -----------------------------
                                     Larry E. Romrell




     Date:  March 14, 1997               /s/ J. C. Sparkman
                                     -----------------------------
                                     J. C. Sparkman




     Date:  March 14, 1997               /s/ J. David Wargo
                                     -----------------------------
                                     J. David Wargo




     Date:  March 24, 1997               /s/ Craig M. Waggy
                                     -----------------------------
                                     Craig M. Waggy
§ 2.102 Holding facility. ( a ) If any dealer or exhibitor obtains the prior approval of the Deputy Administrator, he may arrange to have another person hold animals for the required period provided for in paragraph (a) of § 2.101: *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) The other person agrees in writing to comply with the regulations in part 2 and the standards in part 3 of this subchapter and to allow inspection of his premises by an APHIS official during business hours; and
( 2 ) The animals remain under the total control and responsibility of the dealer or exhibitor.
( 3 ) Approval will not be given for a dealer or exhibitor holding a license as set forth in § 2.1 to have animals held for purposes of this section by another licensed dealer or exhibitor. APHIS Form 7009 shall be used for approval.
( 4 ) The other person or premises must either be directly included in the dealer's or exhibitor's contingency plan required under § 2.134 or must develop its own contingency plan in accordance with § 2.134.
( b ) If any intermediate handler obtains prior approval of the Deputy Administrator, it may arrange to have another person hold animals: *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) The other person agrees in writing to comply with the regulations in part 2 and the standards in part 3 of this subchapter and to allow inspection of the premises by an APHIS official during business hours; and
( 2 ) The animals remain under the total control and responsibility of the research facility or intermediate handler.
( 3 ) The other person or premises must either be directly included in the intermediate handler's contingency plan required under § 2.134 or must develop its own contingency plan in accordance with § 2.134.
[54 FR 36147, Aug. 31, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 13896, Mar. 15, 1995; 63 FR 62927, Nov. 10, 1998; 69 FR 42102, July 14, 2004; 77 FR 76823, Dec. 31, 2012; 85 FR 28798, May 13, 2020]
### SUBCHAPTER V—ADMINISTRATION, ENFORCEMENT, AND REVIEW
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lavon Logan, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 12197;

Fourth District

December 17, 1974.

John F. McNichols, of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Springfield, for appellant.

No appearance for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE SMITH.
PUBLIC LAW 110–14—MAR. 21, 2007 121 STAT. 69

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 544:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–18 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Mar. 6, considered and passed House.

Mar. 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 110–14

110th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in Santa Fe,

New Mexico, as the ‘‘Santiago E. Campos United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse at South Federal Place in Santa

Fe, New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Santiago

E. Campos United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Santiago E. Campos United States Courthouse’’.

Approved March 21, 2007.

Mar. 21, 2007

[H.R. 544]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 27, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00883

- CR

Victor Leon , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUST I CE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the part ies’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Because

appel lant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                       305
<INVENTORY>                                        874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,622
<PP&E>                                          63,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,861
<BONDS>                                         14,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,870
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,301
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,853
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,853
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

# SUMMARY:

The Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is collaborating with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and with national health surveys around the world to lead an international effort to study the differences and similarities in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] distributions around the world. A key first step in that process is the standardization of the measurement results of serum 25(OH)D from the different health surveys to a higher-order method developed by NIST.

This program includes but is not limited to the creation of serum materials with values assigned by a reference method that can be used for calibration and trueness control by laboratories measuring 25(OH)D. These materials will be made available through the newly created CDC Vitamin D Standardization Coordinating Center (VDSCC). While the main focus of the Vitamin D Standardization Program is on standardizing measurements done in national health surveys, it also allows for participation of clinical, public health, research and commercial laboratories and commercial trade organizations in the standardization effort.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Ms. Cindy Rooney, Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 2B03, Bethesda, MD 20892-7523,                         *Phone:*                         301-496-1508;                         *Fax:*                         301-402-0420;                         *E-mail: rooneyc@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: February 22, 2011.

Paul M. Coates,

Director, Office of Dietary Supplements, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 2011-4603 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Crustal deformation at theleading edge of the Oregon Coast Range block, offshore Washington (ColumbiaRiver to Hoh River)**
 
Report | Plate 1 | Plate 2
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1661-A
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001047348
 
February 28, 2018
### §196. Special censuses

The Secretary may conduct special censuses for the government of any State, or of any county, city, or other political subdivision within a State, for the government of the District of Columbia, and for the government of any possession or area (including political subdivisions thereof) referred to in section 191(a) of this title, on subjects covered by the censuses provided for in this title, upon payment to the Secretary of the actual or estimated cost of each such special census. The results of each such special census shall be designated "Official Census Statistics". These statistics may be used in the manner provided by applicable law.

(Added Pub. L. 94–521, §11(a), Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2464.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 17, 1976, see section 17 of Pub. L. 94–521, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Special Census When Major Population Changes Occur Due to Large Numbers of Legal Immigrants Within Six Months of Regular Decennial Census Date

Pub. L. 96–369, §118, Oct. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 1357, provided that: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the President determines that a State, county, or local unit of general purpose government is significantly affected by a major population change due to a large number of legal immigrants within six months of a regular decennial census date, he may order a special census, pursuant to section 196 of title XIII of the United States Code [this section], or other method of obtaining a revised estimate of the population, of such jurisdiction or subsections of that jurisdiction in which the immigrants are concentrated. If the President decides to conduct a special census, it may be conducted solely at Federal expense."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 12256

Ex. Ord. No. 12256, Dec. 15, 1980, 45 F.R. 83189, which required the Bureau of the Census to supply estimates of the number of legal immigrants within certain jurisdictions, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 12553, Feb. 25, 1986, 51 F.R. 7237.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,494
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                        75
<INVENTORY>                                     51,173
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,863
<PP&E>                                         128,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,165
<BONDS>                                         73,309
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           601
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,691
<SALES>                                        341,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               341,703
<CGS>                                          230,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  230,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,526)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (425)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2010063EN.01005401.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/54

---

Action brought on 18 January 2010 — Nastvogel v Council

(Case F-4/10)

2010/C 63/95

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christiana Nastvogel (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, H.-N. Louis and E Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision establishing the applicant's staff report for the period from 1 July 2006 to 31 December 2007.

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision establishing the applicant's staff report for the period from 1 July 2006 to 31 December 2007. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision establishing the applicant's staff report for the period from 1 July 2006 to 31 December 2007.

| — | Costs order against the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Costs order against the Council of the European Union.

---
#### Michael Lavin, Respondent, v. Degnon Contracting Company, Appellant.

Motion denied. Present — Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
Foamex  International  Inc.  on Forms  S-3 (File  Nos.  33-88218,  33-85488  and
33-92156)  and Forms S-8 (File Nos.  33-74264 and  33-94154) of our report dated
February 26, 1997 on our audits of the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
financial statement  schedules of Foamex  International Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 29, 1996 and December 31, 1995, and for the years ended December 29,
1996,  December  31, 1995 and January 1, 1995,  which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.






COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 11, 1997