alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 9034.11 Winding down costs. ( a ) *Winding down costs. Winding down costs* are costs associated with the termination of political activity related to a candidate's seeking his or her nomination for election, such as the costs of complying with the post election requirements of the Federal Election Campaign Act and the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, and other necessary administrative costs associated with winding down the campaign, including office space rental, staff salaries, and office supplies. Winding down costs are qualified campaign expenses.
( b ) *Winding down limitation.* The total amount of winding down costs that may be paid for, in whole or part, with matching funds shall not exceed the lesser of: ( 1 ) 10% of the overall expenditure limitation pursuant to 11 CFR 9035.1; or
( 2 ) 10% of the total of: ( i ) The candidate's expenditures subject to the overall expenditure limitation as of the candidate's date of ineligibility; plus
( ii ) The candidate's expenses exempt from the expenditure limitations as of the candidate's date of ineligibility; except that
( iii ) The winding down limitation shall be no less than $100,000.
( c ) *Allocation of primary and general election winding down costs.* A candidate who runs in both the primary and general election may divide winding down expenses between his or her primary and general election committees using any reasonable allocation method. An allocation method is reasonable if it divides the total winding down costs between the primary and general election committees and results in no less than one third of total winding down costs allocated to each committee. A candidate may demonstrate than an allocation method is reasonable even if either the primary or the general election committee is allocated less than one third of total winding down costs.
( d ) *Primary winding down costs during the general election period.* A primary election candidate who does not run in the general election may receive and use matching funds for these purposes either after he or she has notified the Commission in writing of his or her withdrawal from the campaign for nomination or after the date of the party's nominating convention, if he or she has not withdrawn before the convention. A primary election candidate who runs in the general election, regardless of whether the candidate receives public funds for the general election, must wait until 31 days after the general election before using any matching funds for winding down costs related to the primary election. No expenses incurred by a primary election candidate who runs in the general election prior to 31 days after the general election shall be considered primary winding down costs.
[68 FR 47419, Aug. 8, 2003]
#### §§ 6.112-6.129 [Reserved]
#### § 9008.14 Petitions for rehearing; stays of repayment determinations.

Petitions for rehearing following the Commission's repayment determination and requests for stays of repayment determinations will be governed by the procedures set forth at 11 CFR 9007.5 and 9038.5. The Commission will afford convention committees the same rights as are provided to publicly funded candidates under 11 CFR 9007.5 and 9038.5.

[64 FR 49363, Sept. 13, 1999]
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / Presidential Documents 11929 

Proclamation 8629 of February 28, 2011 

Irish-American Heritage Month, 2011 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Our diverse Nation has been shaped by the sacrifices and successes of 

those who crossed both land and sea in pursuit of a common dream. For 

millions of Americans, this journey began in Ireland. In the wake of the 

Great Hunger, many sons and daughters of Erin came to our shores seeking 

a brighter day, with only courage and the enduring values of faith and 

family to sustain them. Alongside many others who sought a better life 

in a new Nation, these intrepid immigrants built strong communities and 

helped forge our country’s future. During Irish-American Heritage Month, 

we honor the contributions Irish Americans have made, and celebrate the 

nearly 40 million among us who proudly trace their roots back to Ireland. 

From the earliest days of our Republic, the Irish have overcome discrimination and carved out a place for themselves in the American story. Through 

hard work, perseverance, and patriotism, women and men of Irish descent 

have given their brawn, brains, and blood to make and remake this Nation— 

pulling it westward, pushing it skyward, and moving it forward. Half a 

century ago, John F. Kennedy became our first Irish-American Catholic President and summoned an expectant citizenry to greatness. This year, as we 

commemorate the 50th anniversary of President Kennedy’s inauguration, 

we recognize our 35th President and the countless other Irish Americans 

whose leadership and service have steered the course of our Nation. 

Seldom in this world has a country so small had so large an impact on 

another. Today, the rich culture of Ireland touches all aspects of American 

society, and the friendship that binds Ireland and the United States is 

marked by a shared past and a common future. As communities across 

our country celebrate Irish-American Heritage Month and St. Patrick’s Day, 

our Nation pays tribute to the proud lineage passed down to so many 

Americans from the Emerald Isle. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 2011 as 

Irish-American Heritage Month. I call upon all Americans to observe this 

month by celebrating the contributions of Irish Americans to our Nation. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCD1

11930 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth 

day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of 

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 

thirty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5029 

Filed 3–2–11; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCD1OB#1.EPS</GPH>
# C_2006294EN.01003601.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/36

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v P. Jurriëns Beheer BV

(Case C-406/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/64)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 28.01.2006.

1

---
#### § 203.6 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1218 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1218

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue to the Landusky School 
 District, without consideration, a patent for the surface and mineral 
            estates of certain lots, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That subject to valid 
existing rights, the Secretary of the Interior shall issue to the 
Landusky School District, without consideration, a patent for the 
surface and mineral estates of approximately 2.06 acres of land as 
follows: T.25 N, R.24 E, Montana Prime Meridian, section 27 block 2, 
school reserve, and section 27, block 3, lot 13.

            Passed the Senate April 13, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1218

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue to the Landusky School 
 District, without consideration, a patent for the surface and mineral 
            estates of certain lots, and for other purposes.
```
§ 9.31 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such expenditure.
( b ) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (see appendix B to this part) to be filed or amended if required herein, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
( c ) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an allegation of such failure.
( d ) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the agency shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
( e ) First offenders under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000, absent aggravating circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons shall be subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $10,000 and $100,000, as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
( f ) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil penalty.
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Sterling Law, LLC Sigal Chattah Girardi & Keese Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Salt Lake City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11501-11502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

    Amended Notice of Meeting
    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special 
Emphasis Panel, April

[[Page 11502]]

5, 2011, 1 p.m. to April 5, 2011, 3 p.m., National Institutes of 
Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 
20892 which was published in the Federal Register on February 23, 2011, 
76 10042.
    The meeting will be held on April 14, 2011 from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. 
The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: February 24, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4632 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Marshall Holdings International, Inc. for the first quarter ending March 31,
2007, I, W. Jamie Plante, Chief Financial Officer of Marshall Holdings
International, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the first quarter ending
March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the first quarter ending March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Marshall Holdings
International, Inc.

     Dated: May 21, 2007.

                                     /s/  W. Jamie Plante
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     W. Jamie Plante, Chief Financial Officer of
                                     Marshall Holdings International, Inc.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the report of Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark D.
      Dacko the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to
      and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                April 16, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Mark D. DackoMark
                D. DackoChief
                Financial Officer
# C_2006326EN.01003203.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/32

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 18 October 2006 — Comunidad Autónoma de Castilla y León v Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya, Cámara de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Bilbao, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

(Case C-434/06)

(2006/C 326/68)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Comunidad Autónoma de Castilla y León

Applicant:

Defendants: Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya, Cámara de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Bilbao, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

Defendants:

Question referred

Must Article 87(1) EC be construed as meaning that, by providing for a rate of tax lower than the basic rate set in Spanish State legislation and for a deduction from the amount of tax payable which does not exist in State tax legislation, provisions in the field of taxation adopted by the Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Bizkaia amending Articles 29(1)(a) and 37 of the Provincial Law on Company Tax, which take effect in the jurisdiction of that infra-State autonomous body, must be regarded as selective and as covered by the definition of State aid enshrined in Article 87(1) EC and, accordingly, must be notified to the Commission pursuant to Article 88(3) EC?

---
#### § 700.57 Dependent.

A dependent is a person who either derives more than one-half of his/her support from another or is under the custody, control and care of another. In instances where there are conflicting claims for the dependent status of a person in more than one household, the household of the person having custody, control and care shall be determined to be the household wherein the person is a dependent.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 463

Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives regarding Presidential circumvention of the legislative authority of the Congress to

set public policy.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 5, 2000

Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. BARR of

Georgia, Mr. COBURN, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. PAUL, and Mrs. CHENOWETHHAGE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives

regarding Presidential circumvention of the legislative

authority of the Congress to set public policy.

Whereas article I, section 1 of the Constitution specifies that

‘‘All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in

a Congress of the United States’’;

Whereas a ‘‘republic’’ is defined as ‘‘a government in which

supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to

vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to

law’’;

Whereas individual Americans consistently express their opinions to Members of Congress;
2

•HRES 463 IH

Whereas Members of Congress are duly elected and serve to

uphold the Constitution and represent the views of their

constituents; and

Whereas the administration has encouraged litigation against

law-abiding private companies in order to force the adoption of certain policy initiatives: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President and appointed members

3 and staff of the executive branch should not use litigation

4 in a coercive manner in order to circumvent the legislative

5 function of the Congress.

Æ
# C_2007082EN.01002705.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 November 2006 — Bausch & Lomb Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Biofarma SA

(Case C-95/06 P) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/55)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

1

---
### §2279d. Termination of System institution status

#### (a) Conditions

A System institution may terminate the status of the institution as a System institution if—

(1) the institution provides written notice to the Farm Credit Administration Board not later than 90 days prior to the proposed termination date;

(2) the termination is approved by the Farm Credit Administration Board;

(3) the appropriate Federal or State authority grants approval to charter the institution as a bank, savings and loan association, or other financial institution;

(4) the institution pays to the Farm Credit Insurance Fund the amount by which the total capital of the institution exceeds 6 percent of the assets;

(5) the institution pays or makes adequate provision for payment of all outstanding debt obligations of the institution;

(6) the termination is approved by a majority of the stockholders of the institution voting, in person or by written proxy, at a duly authorized stockholders' meeting, held prior to giving notice to the Farm Credit Administration Board; and

(7) the institution meets such other conditions as the Farm Credit Administration Board by regulation considers appropriate.

#### (b) Effect

On termination of its status as a System institution—

(1) the Farm Credit Administration Board shall revoke the charter of the institution; and

(2) the institution shall no longer be an instrumentality of the United States under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title VII, §7.10, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §416, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1650; amended Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(41), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4683.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 115–334 added par. (4) and struck out former par. (4) which read as follows: "the institution pays to the Farm Credit Assistance Fund, as created under section 2278b–5 of this title, if the termination is prior to January 1, 1992, or pays to the Farm Credit Insurance Fund, if the termination is after such date, the amount by which the total capital of the institution exceeds, 6 percent of the assets;".
### §3106a. Compliance with State and Federal laws

(1) Every branch or agency of a foreign bank and every commercial lending company controlled by one or more foreign banks or by one or more foreign companies that control a foreign bank shall conduct its operations in the United States in full compliance with provisions of any law of the United States or any State thereof which—

(A) impose requirements that protect the rights of consumers in financial transactions, to the extent that the branch, agency, or commercial lending company engages in activities that are subject to such laws;

(B) prohibit discrimination against any individual or other person on the basis of the race, color, religion, sex, marital status, age, or national origin of (i) such individual or other person or (ii) any officer, director, employee, or creditor of, or any owner of any interest in, such individual or other person; and

(C) apply to national banks or State-chartered banks doing business in the State in which such branch or agency or commercial lending company, as the case may be, is doing business.

(2) No application for a branch or agency shall be approved by the Comptroller or by a State bank supervisory authority, as the case may be, unless the entity making the application has agreed to conduct all of its operations in the United States in full compliance with provisions of any law of the United States or any State thereof which—

(A) impose requirements that protect the rights of consumers in financial transactions, to the extent that the branch, agency, or commercial lending company engages in activities that are subject to such laws;

(B) prohibit discrimination against individuals or other persons on the basis of the race, color, religion, sex, marital status, age, or national origin of (i) such individual or other person or (ii) any officer, director, employee, or creditor of, or any owner of any interest in, such individual or other person; and

(C) apply to national banks or State-chartered banks doing business in the State in which the entity to be established is to do business.

(Pub. L. 95–369, §9(b), as added Pub. L. 95–630, title III, §311, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3678; amended Pub. L. 103–328, title I, §107(c), Sept. 29, 1994, 108 Stat. 2360.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Par. (1). Pub. L. 103–328, §107(c)(1), added subpar. (A) and redesignated former subpars. (A) and (B) as (B) and (C), respectively.

Par. (2). Pub. L. 103–328, §107(c)(2), added subpar. (A) and redesignated former subpars. (A) and (B) as (B) and (C), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of 120 days after Nov. 10, 1978, see section 2101 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 375b of this title.
### §4242. Contract decisions nonreviewable

Notwithstanding any other law, no court shall have jurisdiction over any claim based on the Attorney General's decision to refuse to enter into a contract for legal services referred to in section 4241 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2589, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4905.)