alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §337. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–485, §13(g), July 1, 1966, 80 Stat. 243

Section, act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §9 (par.), as added June 16, 1933, ch. 89, §5(c), 48 Stat. 166, required agreements of State member banks with holding company affiliates to be subject to voting restrictions and to provide for forfeiture of membership on failure to file agreement.

This section was comprised of the twenty-second par. of section 9 of act Dec. 23, 1913, as amended. The twenty-second par. constituted the twentieth par. of section 9 when added in 1933, became the twenty-first par. in 1935 (49 Stat. 704), and became the twenty-second par. in 1950 (64 Stat. 458). For further details, see Codification notes set out under sections 321 and 329a of this title.
#### A. G. *&*T. Realty and Construction Company *v.*Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Milford

*Leo P. Carroll,*in support of the petition.

*Thomas E. Minogue, Jr.,*in opposition.

Submitted June 18

decided July *2,*1974

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County is granted limited to the issue of the sustaining of the appeal without ordering a remand. See *Boque*v. *Zoning Board of Appeals,*165 Conn. 749, 345 A.2d 9.
I 

/ 

/ 

AVIATION 

p~ 

!- ~J ~.- -· ·. " 

June 5, 2015 

SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY TO: Federal Docket Management System, www.regulations.gov 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590-0001 

Subject: Second status request regarding petition for exemption under docket FAA-2014-0714 for Brim 

Equipment Leasing, Inc. dba. Brim Aviation 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

This letter is in regard to the petition for exemption submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration on 

September 10, 2014 under docket number FAA-2014-0714. We respectfully request, at your earliest 

convenience, the status of this matter. 

BB/jp 

I I 

I 

PO Box 3009, Ashland, OR 97520 

Tel: 541-482-1008 • Fax: 866-929-5133 

www.brimaviation.com
OMB EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE (3 of 4)

From:

Amy Hambrick/RTP/USEPA/US

To:

"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc:

David Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:

06/08/2012 03:29 PM

Subject:

Re: CISWI rule -- list of changes from 2011 final r ule

Greetings Cortney,

Will a redline of the 2011 rule work for you? We ar e aware of 93 CISWI units.

Have a nice afternoon,

Amy

Amy Hambrick

Fuels and Incineration Group

US EPA / OAQPS / Sector Policies and Programs Divis ion

Phone: 919-541-0964

"Higgins, Cortney" ---06/08/2012 10:12:38 AM---Hi D ave, Do you have a table or list of the changes fro m the 2011 final rule?

From:

"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To:

David Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Hambrick/RTP/USE PA/US@EPA

Date:

06/08/2012 10:12 AM

Subject:

CISWI rule -- list of changes from 2011 final rule

Hi Dave,

Do you have a table or list of the changes from the 2011 final rule?

Also, what’s the universe (number of affected sourc es) in the final rule?

I’ll be sending over interagency comments later tod ay.

Thanks,

Cortney
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Forms S-3 No. 333-112311,No. 333-38167, No. 333-82685, No. 333-92577,No. 333-36790 and No. 333-51914) and in the relatedprospectuses, and to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-11299, No. 333-35287,No. 333-85575, 333-59158, No. 333-34320,No. 333-52804, No. 333-59160, No. 333-123452and No. 333-129269) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Plan, the 1996Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan, the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, theGMS/Affymetrix 1998 Stock Plan, the Affymetrix/Neomorphic, Inc. 1998 StockOption Plan, the Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan of Affymetrix, Inc.and the ParAllele BioScience, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan of Affymetrix,Inc. of our report dated March 2, 2006, (except for Notes 3 and 20, as towhich the date is August 23, 2006), with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Affymetrix, Inc., and our reportdated March 2, 2006, with respect to Affymetrix, Inc. management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofAffymetrix, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)for the year ended December 31, 2005.
| /s/ ERNST & YOUNG  LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| Palo Alto,  California          |   |
| August 23, 2006                 |   |

 

----
§ 9002.2 Candidate. ( a ) For the purposes of this subchapter, *candidate* means with respect to any presidential election, an individual who— ( 1 ) Has been nominated by a major party for election to the office of President of the United States or the office of Vice President of the United States; or
( 2 ) Has qualified or consented to have his or her name appear on the general election ballot (or to have the names of electors pledged to him or her on such ballot) as the candidate of a political party for election to either such office in 10 or more States. For the purposes of this section, *political party* shall be defined in accordance with 11 CFR 9002.15.
( b ) An individual who is no longer actively conducting campaigns in more than one State pursuant to 11 CFR 9004.8 shall cease to be a candidate for the purpose of this subchapter.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 23


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (NO. 333-63781) on Form S-8 of Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc. of
our report dated January 13, 2000, relating to the consolidated statements of
financial condition of Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which
report is included in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc.


                                    /s/ Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker

Bangor, Maine
March 28, 2000
# C_2007096EN.01001402.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 April 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Velvet & Steel Immobilien und Handels GmbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel

(Case C-455/05) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Exemptions - Article 13B(d)(2) - Concept of ‘assumption of obligations’ - Assumption of the obligation to renovate a property - Refusal of exemption)

(2007/C 96/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Velvet & Steel Immobilien und Handels GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of Article 13B(d)(2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1), as amended — Concept of ‘assumption of obligations ’— Refusal to exempt the assumption of a renovation obligation

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13B(d)(2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of assumption of obligations excludes from the scope of that provision obligations which are non-pecuniary, such as the obligation to renovate a property.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.

1

---
# C_2007082EN.01001102.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/11

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling of the Krajský súd v Prešove, Slovak Republic) — František Koval'ský v Mesto Prešov, Dopravný podnik Mesta Prešov, a.s.

(Case C-302/06) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Property law - Electrical installations on private land without compensation for the owners - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2007/C 82/22)

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Krajský súd v Prešove

Parties

Applicant: František Koval'ský

Applicant:

Defendants: Mesto Prešov, Dopravný podnik Mesta Prešov, a.s.

Defendants:

Intevernors: Zuzana Petrová, Ondrej Valla

Intevernors

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Krajský súd v Prešove — Interpretation of Article 6 EU and Article 1 of the Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Paris on 20 March 1952 — Property law — National legislation under which electrical installations may be placed on private land without the owners being entitled to compensation

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Communities clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Krajský súd v Prešove V by decisions of 2 May and 21 July 2006.

---

(1)  OJ C 249 of 14.10.2006.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1030 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1030

To provide that the conveyance by the Bureau of Land Management of the 
surface estate to certain land in the State of Wyoming in exchange for 
 certain private land will not result in the removal of the land from 
                     operation of the mining laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1999

 Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Thomas) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that the conveyance by the Bureau of Land Management of the 
surface estate to certain land in the State of Wyoming in exchange for 
 certain private land will not result in the removal of the land from 
                     operation of the mining laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 60 BAR LAND EXCHANGE.

    (a) In General.--Sections 2201.1-2(d) and 2091.3-2(c) of title 43 
Code of Federal Regulations, shall not apply in the case of the 
conveyance by the Secretary of the Interior of the land described in 
subsection (b) in exchange for approximately 9,480 acres of land in 
Campbell County, Wyoming, pursuant to the terms of the Cow Creek/60 Bar 
land exchange, WYW-143315.
    (b) Land Description.--The land described in this subsection 
comprises the following land in Campbell and Johnson Counties, Wyoming:
            (1) Approximately 2,960 acres of land in the tract known as 
        the ``Bill Barlow Ranch'';
            (2) Approximately 2,315 acres of land in the tract know as 
        the ``T-Chair Ranch'';
            (3) Approximately 3,948 acres of land in the tract known as 
        the ``Bob Christensen Ranch'';
            (4) Approximately 11,609 acres of land in the tract known 
        as the ``John Christensen Ranch''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 111.22 Ex parte communications. ( a ) In order to avoid the possibility of prejudice, real or apparent, to the public interest in enforcement actions pending before the Commission pursuant to 11 CFR part 111, except to the extent required for the disposition of ex parte matters as required by law (for example, during the normal course of an investigation or a conciliation effort), no interested person outside the agency shall make or cause to be made to any Commissioner or any member of any Commissioner's staff any ex parte communication relative to the factual or legal merits of any enforcement action, nor shall any Commissioner or member of any Commissioner's staff make or entertain any such ex parte communications.
( b ) The prohibition of this regulation shall apply from the time a complaint is filed with the Commission pursuant to 11 CFR part 111 or from the time that the Commission determines on the basis of information ascertained in the normal course of its supervisory responsibilities that it has reason to believe that a violation has occurred or may occur pursuant to 11 CFR part 111, and remains in force until the Commission has finally concluded all action with respect to the enforcement matter in question.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit contact between a respondent or respondent's attorney and any attorney or staff member of the Office of General Counsel in the course of representing the Commission or the respondent with respect to an enforcement proceeding or civil action. No statement made by such a Commission attorney or staff member during any such communication shall bind or estop the Commission in any way.
### §2281. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

The Congress finds that demands for funds through Federal and federally assisted borrowing programs are increasing faster than the total supply of credit and that such borrowings are not adequately coordinated with overall Federal fiscal and debt management policies. The purpose of this chapter is to assure coordination of these programs with the overall economic and fiscal policies of the Government, to reduce the cost of Federal and federally assisted borrowings from the public, and to assure that such borrowings are financed in a manner least disruptive of private financial markets and institutions.

(Pub. L. 93–224, §2, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 937.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 93–224, §20, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 942, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter and amending section 24 of this title] becomes effective upon the date of its enactment [Dec. 29, 1973], except that section 7 [section 2286 of this title] becomes effective upon the expiration of thirty days after such date [Dec. 29, 1973]."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 93–224, §1, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 937, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter and amending section 24 of this title] may be cited as the 'Federal Financing Bank Act of 1973'."

#### Separability

Pub. L. 93–224, §19, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 942, provided that: "If any provision of this Act [enacting this chapter and amending section 24 of this title], or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the Act [this chapter], and the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected."

#### Termination of Advisory Councils

Advisory councils established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the date of their establishment, unless, in the case of a council established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such council is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a council established by the Congress, its duration is otherwise provided for by law. See sections 1001(2) and 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 11782

Ex. Ord. No. 11782, May 6, 1974, 39 F.R. 15991, which established the Federal Financing Bank Advisory Council and provided for its membership, functions, etc., was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 12379, §15, Aug. 17, 1982, 47 F.R. 36099, formerly set out as a note under section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

BILLY R. TYLER, ) 

) 

Petitioner, ) 

FILED 

JUL 21 2009 

Clerk, U.S. District and 

Bankruptcy Courts 

) 

v. ) 

) 

Civil Action No. 09 1347 

EPA ADMINISTRATOR, ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter comes before the Court on review of petitioner's application to proceed in 

forma pauperis and his pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. The Court will grant the 

application and deny the petition. 

Petitioner alleges that he lives on a "contaminated superfund site in Omaha, Nebraska," 

and that he "suffers from arrested mental development due to extreme lead poisoning" caused by 

contaminants in the soil. Pet. at 2. He demands "a writ of mandamus compelling respondents to 

use the 'superfund' money to remove the diaspora of holocaust oflead contamination off of' the 

site. Id. at 1. 

Mandamus relief is proper only if"(1) the plaintiff has a clear right to relief; (2) the 

defendant has a clear duty to act; and (3) there is no other adequate remedy available to plaintiff." 

Council of and for the Blind of Delaware County Valley v. Regan, 709 F.2d 1521, 1533 (D.C. 

Cir. 1983) (en banc). The party seeking mandamus has the "burden of showing that [his] right to 

issuance of the writ is 'clear and indisputable.'" Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas 

Corp., 485 U.S. 271,289 (1988) (citing Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Holland, 346 U.S. 379, 384 
(1953)). Where the action petitioner seeks to compel is discretionary, he has no clear right to 

relief and mandamus therefore is not an appropriate remedy. See, e.g., Heckler v. Ringer, 466 

u.s. 602,616 (1984). 

Petitioner does not establish any of these elements. He fails to demonstrate his clear right 

to relief, the respondents' clear duty to expend funds as petitioner requests, and the lack of any 

other adequate remedy. Because the petition does not state a claim upon which mandamus relief 

may be granted, the petition will be denied. 

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued separately on this 

same date. 

United States District Judge 

Date: 1--' I("b f
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 
-  Rulemaking 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda - April 20, 2023

LBC-April-20-2023-Agenda-final2.pdf (217.92 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3776]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Pediatrics Subcommittee.
    Date: March 17, 2011.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Legacy Hotel and Meeting Center, 1775 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Rita Anand, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-496-1487. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d9b8b7b8b7bdab99b4b8b0b5f7b7b0b1f7beb6af"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9c8c7c8c7cddbe9c4c8c0c587c7c0c187cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 14, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-3776 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>