alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 12.10 Stipulations. ( a ) At any time prior to the issuance of a complaint seeking a civil penalty under the Act, the Administrator, in his discretion, may enter into a stipulation with any person in which: ( 1 ) The Administration gives notice of an apparent violation of the Act or the regulations issued thereunder by such person and affords such person an opportunity for a hearing regarding the matter as provided by the Act;
( 2 ) Such person expressly waives hearing and agrees to a specified order including an agreement to pay a specified civil penalty within a designated time; and
( 3 ) The Administrator agrees to accept the specified order including a civil penalty in settlement of the particular matter involved if it is paid within the designated time.
( b ) If the specified penalty is not paid within the time designated in such a stipulation, the amount of the stipulated penalty shall not be relevant in any respect to the penalty which may be assessed after issuance of a complaint.
[42 FR 10960, Feb. 25, 1977, as amended at 68 FR 6342, Feb. 7, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001062780
<NAME> UNITED WISCONSIN SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,686
<SECURITIES>                                   156,589
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               237,553
<PP&E>                                          19,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          198,347
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,660
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,906
<SALES>                                        341,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               347,952
<CGS>                                          354,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  354,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    80
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,323)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,010)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,313)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,313)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
October 15, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM CHARLES WINGATE, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00647-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order

signed by the court below on June 30, 2015. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, William Charles Wingate.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 309.19 Market hog segregation under the new swine slaughter inspection system. ( a ) The establishment must conduct market hog sorting activities before the animals are presented for ante-mortem inspection. Market hogs exhibiting signs of moribundity, central nervous system disorders, or pyrexia must be disposed of according to paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) The establishment must develop, implement, and maintain written procedures to ensure that market hogs exhibiting signs of moribundity, central nervous system disorders, or pyrexia do not enter the official establishment to be slaughtered. The establishment must incorporate these procedures into its HACCP plan, or sanitation SOPs, or other prerequisite programs.
( c ) The establishment must identify livestock that establishment employees have sorted and removed from slaughter with a unique tag, tattoo, or similar device. The establishment must develop, implement, and maintain written procedures to ensure that the animals sorted and removed from slaughter do not enter the human food supply and are disposed of according to 9 CFR part 314.
( d ) The establishment must maintain records to document the number of animals disposed of per day because they were removed from slaughter by establishment sorters before ante-mortem inspection by FSIS inspectors and the reasons that the animals were removed. These records are subject to review and evaluation by FSIS personnel.
( e ) The establishment must immediately notify FSIS inspectors if the establishment has reason to believe that market hogs may have a notifiable animal disease. Notifiable animal diseases are designated by World Animal Health Organization.
[84 FR 52345, Oct. 1, 2019]
### [§2516. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1081(g), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 455]

Section, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4226(a), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2684; amended Pub. L. 103–35, title II, §201(g)(8), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 100, related to Military-Civilian Integration and Technology Transfer Advisory Board.

A prior section 2516, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §823(a)(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1602, related to enhancement of concurrent engineering practices in design and development of weapon systems, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–484, §4202(a).
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Davis 
LLP on behalf of Imperial Oil in connection with a regulatory 
proceeding regarding the shipment of petroleum diluents (Diluent) in 
the Enbridge Southern Lights Pipeline (ESL) pending before the National 
Energy Board of Canada, captioned NEB File OF-Tolls-Group2-E242-TFGen 
01 01 (WB11-021), for permission to use certain data from the Board's 
2008 and 2009 Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this request may be 
obtained from the Office of Economics.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.

Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011-5015 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
### **CHAPTER 35—SEAT BELT REGULATION**
# C_2007066EN.01000501.xml

| 22.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 March 2007

(2007/C 66/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3293 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4492 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3034 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6153 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,16 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1950 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5800 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,938 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7095 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8744 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3543 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,390 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8530 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6590 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5409 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3828 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8861 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0250 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 248,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7516 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2808 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3775 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 143,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6180 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,139 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,560 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3293

JPY

Japanese yen

156,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4492

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67890

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3034

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6153

ISK

Iceland króna

89,16

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1950

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5800

CZK

Czech koruna

27,938

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7095

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8744

RON

Romanian leu

3,3543

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,390

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8530

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6590

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5409

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3828

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8861

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0250

KRW

South Korean won

1 248,21

ZAR

South African rand

9,7516

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2808

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3775

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 143,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6180

PHP

Philippine peso

64,139

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6200

THB

Thai baht

42,560

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.151 Are there any appeals this subpart does not cover? This subpart does not cover: ( a ) Disputes which arise after a self-determination contract has been awarded, or emergency reassumption of self-determination contracts or suspension of payments under self-determination contracts, which are covered under § 900.170 through § 900.176 of these regulations.
( b ) Other post-award contract disputes, which are covered under subpart N.
( c ) Denials under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, which may be appealed under 43 CFR 2 for the Department of the Interior and 45 CFR 5 for the Department of Health and Human Services; and
( d ) Decisions relating to the award of discretionary grants under section 103 of the Act, which may be appealed under 25 CFR 2 for the Department of the Interior, and under 45 CFR 5 for the Department of Health and Human Services.
NUMBER 13-14-00093-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

HALLMARK MARKETING COMPANY, LLC, Appellant,

v.

SUSAN COMBS, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC 

ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; AND 

GREG ABBOTT, ATTORNEY GENERAL 

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellees.

On appeal from the 126th District Court

of Travis County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Hallmark Marketing Company, LLC, has attempted to appeal the trial 

court’s December 4, 2013 order granting a “First Amended Traditional and No-Evidence 

Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment” filed by appellees, Susan Combs, 
2

Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and Greg Abbott, Attorney General 

of the State of Texas.

Unless an interlocutory appeal is authorized by statute, an appeal may only be 

taken from a final judgment. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205 (Tex. 2001). 

“[W]hen there has not been a conventional trial on the merits, an order or judgment is not 

final for purposes of appeal unless it actually disposes of every pending claim and party 

or unless it clearly and unequivocally states that it finally disposes of all claims and all 

parties.” Id. “There is no presumption in a partial summary judgment proceeding that the 

judgment was intended to dispose of all parties and issues.” N.Y. Underwriters Ins. Co. 

v. Sanchez, 799 S.W.2d 677, 679 (Tex. 1990); cf. Vaughn v. Drennon, 324 S.W.3d 560, 

561 (Tex. 2010) (noting that “any judgment following a conventional trial on the merits 

creates a presumption that the judgment is final for purposes of appeal”).

The order on appeal in this case granted appellees’ pretrial motion for partial 

summary judgment and denied appellant’s motion for partial summary judgment. It did 

not state, clearly or otherwise, that it disposed of all claims and parties or that it was final 

for purposes of appeal. Moreover, no interlocutory appeal is permitted by statute. Under

these circumstances, we may abate the appeal to permit clarification by the trial court. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 27.2, 44.3, 44.4; Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 206.

Accordingly, we hereby ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial 

court for clarification. Upon remand, the trial court shall address whether it intended the 

December 4, 2013 order to completely dispose of all claims and all parties. The trial court 

shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any orders it may enter, to 

be included in a supplemental clerk’s record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a 
3

supplemental reporter’s record of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental 

clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of 

this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order. The appeal 

will be reinstated upon receipt of the foregoing materials and upon further order of this 

Court.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

6th day of August, 2014.
# C_2007096EN.01003801.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/38

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 April 2007 — Wal-Mart Stores v OHIM — Sánchez Villar (WAL-MART)

(Case T-129/05) (1)

1

(2007/C 96/78)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 115, 14.5.2005.

1

---
# C_2010260EN.01000501.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 1 July 2010 — Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Csn Cayman Ltd v Unifer Steel SL, BNP-Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)

(Case C-315/10)

()

2010/C 260/06

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Csn Cayman Ltd

Applicants:

Defendants: Unifer Steel SL, BNP-Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the fact that the Portuguese judicial authorities have declared that they lack jurisdiction by reason of nationality to hear an action concerning a commercial claim constitute an obstacle to the connection between causes of action referred to in Articles 6(1) and [28] of Regulation No 44/2001, (1) where the Portuguese court has another action pending before it, a Paulian action brought against both the debtor and the third-party transferee, in this case the transferee of a debt receivable, and the depositaries of the subject-matter of the claim assigned to the third-party transferee, the latter having their seats in Portugal, in order that they may all be bound by the res judicata decision to be given? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the fact that the Portuguese judicial authorities have declared that they lack jurisdiction by reason of nationality to hear an action concerning a commercial claim constitute an obstacle to the connection between causes of action referred to in Articles 6(1) and [28] of Regulation No 44/2001, (1) where the Portuguese court has another action pending before it, a Paulian action brought against both the debtor and the third-party transferee, in this case the transferee of a debt receivable, and the depositaries of the subject-matter of the claim assigned to the third-party transferee, the latter having their seats in Portugal, in order that they may all be bound by the res judicata decision to be given?

1

res judicata

| 2. | In the event of a negative response, may Article 6(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 be freely applied to the case? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event of a negative response, may Article 6(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 be freely applied to the case?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

1

---
```

[House Document 110-20]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

110th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 110-20

 
  NOTIFICATION OF A DETERMINATION UNDER THE CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC 
                              RECOVERY ACT

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

  NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION THAT HAITI MEETS THE ELIGIBILITY 
 REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION 213A(d)(1) OF THE CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC 
    RECOVERY ACT AND THAT HAITI IS MEETING THE CONDITIONS REGARDING 
         ENFORCEMENT OF CIRCUMVENTION UNDER SECTION 213A(e)(1)

   March 20, 2007.--Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means and 
                         ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    The Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership 
Encouragement Act of 2006 (Division D, Title V of Public Law 
109-432), amends the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act 
(Title II of the Trade and Development Act of 2000, Public Law 
106-200) (CBERA), to make certain products from Haiti eligible 
for preferential tariff treatment. In accordance with section 
213A of CBERA, as amended, I have determined that Haiti meets 
the eligibility requirements under section 213A(d)(1) of CBERA, 
as amended, and that Haiti is meeting the conditions regarding 
enforcement of circumvention under section 213A(e)(1) of CBERA, 
as amended.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, March 19, 2007.

                                  

```
### §2740. Insignia for additional awards

No more than one Coast Guard cross, distinguished service medal, silver star medal, distinguished flying cross, or Coast Guard medal shall be issued to any one individual; but for each succeeding deed or service sufficient to justify the awarding of a Coast Guard cross, distinguished service medal, silver star medal, distinguished flying cross, or Coast Guard medal, the President may award a suitable emblem or insignia to be worn with the decoration and a corresponding rosette or other device.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 535, §494; Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §13, 70A Stat. 624; Pub. L. 111–281, title II, §224(c)(1), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2922; Pub. L. 113–281, title II, §213, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3029; renumbered §2740, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(33), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4749.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section is supplemental to the preceding sections dealing with the award of medals and regulates the award of additional medals of the same kind. It follows the established practice in all the armed forces (see title 34, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §358). 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 struck out "one" before "Coast Guard medal shall" and substituted "individual" for "person".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 494 of this title as this section.

2014—Pub. L. 113–281 struck out "medal of honor," before "Coast Guard cross," in two places.

2010—Pub. L. 111–281 substituted "Coast Guard cross, distinguished service medal, silver star medal, distinguished flying cross," for "distinguished service medal, distinguished flying cross," in two places.

1956—Act Aug. 10, 1956, included the distinguished flying cross.
Emergency Operating Procedures Flow Chart (Effective 04/22/2013)

PSA Operating Status: http://www.psa.gov/status (202) 220-5766 or (202) 220-5759

Emergency 

Personnel

Mission-Critical 

Personnel Telework- Ready

On an 

activated 

team?

Yes

No

Report for duty on time. 

You are not eligible for

unscheduled leave or unscheduled 

telework, unless authorized by 

supervisor that day. 

Designated 

by your 

supervisor?

Yes

No

Report for duty on time. 

You are not eligible for 

unscheduled leave or unscheduled 

telework, unless authorized by supervisor 

that day.

Emergency employees that do not report for duty on time 

must request leave. If you fail to report on time without 

justifiable cause, you may be placed in an absence without 

leave (AWOL) status and may be subject to disciplinary 

action. In cases of unusual circumstances or hardship, the 

Agency may grant excused absence. You must complete a 

Justification for Excused Absence form and submit it to 

your supervisor no later than the next business day after 

you were scheduled to work.

Mission-critical employees that do not report for duty on 

time must request leave. If you fail to report on time 

without justifiable cause, you may be placed in an absence 

without leave (AWOL) status and may be subject to 

disciplinary action. In cases of unusual circumstances or 

hardship, the Agency may grant excused absence. You 

must complete a Justification for Excused Absence form 

and submit it to your supervisor no later than the next 

business day after you were scheduled to work.

Telework 

at least 

once a 

month?

Yes Unless the needs of the Agency require 

you to report for duty, telework for your 

normal tour of duty or request leave for 

any hours not worked that day.

No

Unless the needs of the Agency 

require you to report for duty, 

excused absence will be granted for 

a designated number of hours or for 

your entire tour of duty, depending 

on the operating status

Telework-ready employees that do not telework must 

request leave. If you fail to telework without justifiable 

cause, you may be placed in an absence without leave 

(AWOL) status and may be subject to disciplinary action. 

In cases of unusual circumstances or hardship, the Agency 

may grant excused absence. You must complete a 

Justification for Excused Absence form and submit it to 

your supervisor no later than the next business day after 

you were scheduled to work.

Non-emergency 

Personnel
## SUBTITLE III—COAST GUARD RESERVE AND AUXILIARY

Chap.
Sec.
37.
Coast Guard Reserve
3701
39.
Coast Guard Auxiliary
3901
41.
General Provisions for Coast Guard Reserve and Auxiliary
4101

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §118(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4232, inserted subtitle III designation and heading and added items for chapters 37 to 41.