alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.44 Grant administration and monitoring.

All grantees under this part shall be responsible for managing day-to-day program operations to ensure that program performance goals are being achieved and to ensure compliance with the provisions of the grant award document and other applicable Federal requirements. Unless delegated to the Agency Superintendent, appropriate area office personnel designated by the Regional Director shall be responsible for all grant program and fiscal monitoring responsibilities.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.126 Shall a construction contract proposal incorporate provisions of Federal construction guidelines and manuals?

Each agency may provide or the Indian tribe or tribal organization may request Federal construction guidelines and manuals for consideration by the Indian tribe or tribal organization in the preparation of its contract proposal. If tribal construction procedures, standards and methods (including national, regional, State, or tribal building codes or construction industry standards) are consistent with or exceed applicable Federal standards, the Secretary shall accept the tribally proposed standards.
# C_2007129EN.01002602.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/26

---

Action brought on 10 April 2007 — Alberto Toronjo Benitez v Commission of the European Communities

(Case F-33/07)

(2007/C 129/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alberto Toronjo Benitez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis, A. Coolen and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the unlawfulness of Article 2 of the Commission's decision on the promotion procedure for officials whose remuneration falls under the ‘Research ’credits of the general budget (both in the version of 16 June 2004 and that of 20 July 2005) (‘the first contested decision’); |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the unlawfulness of Article 2 of the Commission's decision on the promotion procedure for officials whose remuneration falls under the ‘Research ’credits of the general budget (both in the version of 16 June 2004 and that of 20 July 2005) (‘the first contested decision’);

| — | Annul the Commission's decision to remove the 44.5 points from the applicant's balance which he had accumulated as a temporary agent (‘the second contested decision’); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's decision to remove the 44.5 points from the applicant's balance which he had accumulated as a temporary agent (‘the second contested decision’);

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, who took up his post at the Commission on 16 January 2000 as a temporary agent in the ‘Research ’Directorate-General (‘DG’), was appointed as an official in the same DG with effect from 16 April 2004. On 1 May 2005 he was transferred to DG ‘Relex’. By letter of 16 June 2006, he was informed that the points which he had acquired as a temporary agent had been annulled, by application of the first contested decision, since he had moved to a post falling under the ‘Operational ’part of the general budget before two years had expired following his recruitment as a probationary official to a post falling under the ‘Research ’part of that budget.

In support of his action, the applicant relies first on infringement of the principles of legal certainty, administrative legality and protection of acquired rights, since the withdrawal by the Appointing Authority (AIPN) of an unlawful decision constituting subjective rights should have taken place within a reasonable time, which is not the case in respect of the second contested decision.

Furthermore, the applicant submits that Article 2 of the second contested decision is discriminatory against officials whose remuneration falls under the ‘Research ’credits and who apply for a transfer before two years has expired following their recruitment, since those officials lose their points following the transfer whereas officials who are transferred automatically or who occupy posts considered sensitive retain their points.

---
-  About RD                  -  Key Priorities                    -  Priority Points Program Chart 
                -  Rural Development Priorities: FY 2023 
                -  Rural Development Priorities: FY 2024 
              -  History 
              -  Farm Bill 
              -  Grant Awards 
              -  Careers at Rural Development                    -  Current Job Opportunities 
              -  Rural Data Gateway 
              -  Leadership                    -  Under Secretary  
                -  Deputy Under Secretary 
                -  Chief Operating Officer 
                -  Administrators 
                -  State Directors 
              -  Agencies                    -   Rural Business-Cooperative Service                      -  Rural Business-Cooperative Service Contacts 
                -   Rural Housing Service                      -  Rural Housing Service Contacts 
                -   Rural Utilities Service                      -  Rural Utilities Service Contacts 
              -  Offices                    -  Business Center 
                -  Civil Rights                       -  Civil Rights Contacts 
                  -  Equal Employment Opportunity Branch 
                  -  Program Compliant Processing and Resolution Branch 
                  -  Program Compliance and Training Branch 
                  -  Posters 
                  -  Civil Rights Training 
                  -  Limited English Proficiency 
                  -  Civil Rights Library 
                  -  Accessibility Statement 
                -  External Affairs 
                -  Innovation Center                      -  Innovation Center Divisions 
                -  Risk Office 
                -  State Offices 
                -  Servicing Office 
              -  Initiatives                    -  Healthy Food Financing Initiative 
                -  Interagency Working Group on Cooperative Development                      -  Partners                        -  Federal 
                    -  Tribal 
                    -  State & Local 
                    -  Private Sector 
                  -  Funding Resources                        -  Grant Funding 
                    -  Equity Capital 
                    -  Loans and Guaranteed Loans 
                    -  Revolving Loan Funds 
                    -  Crowd Sourcing 
                    -  Technical Assistance 
                    -  Other 
                  -  Development Tools 
                  -  Publications & Information 
                -  Promise Zones 
                -  Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) 
                -  Rural Placemaking 
                -  Substantially Underserved Trust Area (SUTA) 
              -  Tribal Relations                    -  Tribal Relations Events 

## Christine Mechtly

### 

Christine Mechtly is the Director of the  Servicing Asset & Management Office (SO). In this role she oversees all aspects of loan Servicing for RD and Farm Servicing Agency Programs.
# C_2006261EN.01003501.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/35

---

Action brought on 4 September 2006 — Haelterman and Others v Commission

(Case F-102/06)

(2006/C 261/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Geert Haelterman (Ninove, Belgium) and Others (represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the individual decisions rejecting the applicants' applications for the adoption by the Appointing Authority (AIPN) of transitional measures to guarantee, in connection with the 2005 and subsequent promotion procedures, equal treatment and their vested rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the individual decisions rejecting the applicants' applications for the adoption by the Appointing Authority (AIPN) of transitional measures to guarantee, in connection with the 2005 and subsequent promotion procedures, equal treatment and their vested rights;

| — | An order that the Commission of the European Communities pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

An order that the Commission of the European Communities pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants rely on pleas in law identical to those pleaded in Case F-47/06. (1)

1

---

(1)  OJEU C 154, 1.07.2006, p. 25.

1

---
### §§635i to 635i–2. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–429, title I, §121(c)(1), Oct. 21, 1992, 106 Stat. 2199

Section 635i, act July 31, 1945, ch. 341, §12, as added June 9, 1947, ch. 101, §4, 61 Stat. 131; amended Mar. 13, 1968, Pub. L. 90–267, §1(a), 82 Stat. 47, related to assumption of rights and liabilities of existing Bank by Export-Import Bank of the United States including transfer of funds, property, personnel, etc.

Section 635i–1, act July 31, 1945, ch. 341, §13, as added Nov. 30, 1983, Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VI, §619(a)], 97 Stat. 1260, related to establishment of special facilities in support of export transactions to Brazil and Mexico.

Section 635i–2, act July 31, 1945, ch. 341, §14, as added Nov. 30, 1983, Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VI, §621], 97 Stat. 1261, related to notification to Congress of decrease in capital level of Bank.
#### § 15.40 Employment.

No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of that disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the Department. The definitions, requirements and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1614, shall apply to employment of Federally conducted programs or activities.
### SUBCHAPTER I—TROUBLED ASSETS RELIEF PROGRAM
EXHIBIT 21

AFFYMETRIX, INC.  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Affymetrix, UK Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in the United Kingdom and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
France S.A.S., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in France and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix GmbH,
wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Germany and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
Japan K.K., a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Japan and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
Pte Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Singapore and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
Italia, SRL, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Italy and doing business under such name.

Anatrace, Inc.,
wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Ohio and doing business under such name.*

Genetic
MicroSystems, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Massachusetts and doing business under such name.

Neomorphic, Inc.,
wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in California and doing business under such name.

Panomics, Inc.
wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in California and doing business under such name.***

Panomics
SRL, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Italy and doing business under such name.***

Pinecone
Acquisition, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in California and doing business under such name.

True
Materials Incorporated, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Delaware and doing business under such name.**

USB
Corporation, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Ohio and doing business under such name.*

USB
Europe, GmbH, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Germany and doing business under such name.*

---

---



QuickLinks
# C_2007096EN.01000902.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 April 2007 — Holcim (Deutschland) AG, formerly Alsen AG v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-282/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Non-contractual liability of the Community - Article 85 of the EC Treaty (now Article 81 EC) - Reimbursement of bank guarantee charges)

(2007/C 96/14)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Holcim (Deutschland) AG, formerly Alsen AG (represented by: P. Niggemann and F. Wiemer, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Lyal, and G. Wilms, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 21 April 2005 in Case T-28/03 Holcim (Deutschland) v Commission, dismissing an action for damages which sought to obtain, following the annulment of the Commission's decision imposing a fine in a proceeding under Article 81 EC, the reimbursement of charges in respect of a bank guarantee lodged in order to avoid immediate payment of the fine in question.

Holcim (Deutschland)

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2) | Orders Holcim (Deutschland) AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Holcim (Deutschland) AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 3.9.2005.

1

---
EXHIBIT 21

AFFYMETRIX, INC.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Affymetrix, UK Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in the United Kingdom and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
France S.A.S., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in France and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix GmbH,
wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Germany and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
Japan K.K., a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Japan and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
Pte Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Singapore and doing business under such name.

Affymetrix
Italia, SRL, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Italy and doing business under such name.

Anatrace, Inc.,
wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Ohio and doing business under such name.*

Genetic
MicroSystems, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Massachusetts and doing business under such name.

Neomorphic, Inc.,
wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in California and doing business under such name.

Pinecone
Acquisition, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in California and doing business under such name.

USB
Corporation, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Ohio and doing business under such name.*

USB
Europe, GmbH, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Germany and doing business under such name.*

---

---



QuickLinks
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 12:21 PM

To: 'bdahlen@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Pacific Aviaton, LLC

Dear Bjorn Dahlen:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2014‐

1056).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•             Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. ‐ fixed‐wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the proposed

UAS operation.  The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload).  This information can be

located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 4/14/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
### §925. Art. 125. Kidnapping

Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully—

(1) seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, or carries away another person; and

(2) holds the other person against that person's will;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 74; Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title XVII, §1707(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 961; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title V, §531(d)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3364; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5439, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2953.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 925(a)925(b) | 50:719(a).50:719(b). | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 125), 64 Stat. 141. |

925(b)

50:719(b).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to the offenses of forcible sodomy and bestiality.

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted "unlawful force" for "force".

2013—Pub. L. 113–66 amended section catchline and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.

"(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
### §3805. Applicability of consumer protection provisions

Section 501(c)(1) of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 shall not apply to transactions which are subject to this chapter.

(Pub. L. 97–320, title VIII, §806, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1548.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 501(c)(1) of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, referred to in text, is section 501(c)(1) of Pub. L. 96–221, title V, Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 161, which is set out as a note under section 1735f–7 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 15, 1982, see section 807(a) of Pub. L. 97–320, set out as a note under section 3801 of this title.
§ 3.115 Food and drinking water requirements. ( a ) Those marine mammals that require drinking water must be offered potable water within 4 hours of being placed in the primary transport enclosure for transport in commerce. Marine mammals must be provided water as often as necessary and appropriate for the species involved to prevent dehydration, which would jeopardize the good health and well-being of the animals.
( b ) Marine mammals being transported in commerce must be offered food as often as necessary and appropriate for the species involved or as determined by the attending veterinarian.
[66 FR 256, Jan. 3, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RIVER
HOLDING CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-26-1999
<CASH>                                           3,634                     710
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,784                  23,153
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,026)                   (635)
<INVENTORY>                                     25,333                  19,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,092                  44,056
<PP&E>                                          55,803                  46,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (15,940)                 (5,989)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,177                 259,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (30,563)                (15,965)
<BONDS>                                       (115,000)               (115,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          (36,455)                (32,437)
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       (91,748)                (63,125)
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,685                   5,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (346,178)               (259,910)
<SALES>                                        (40,807)                (27,169)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (40,807)                (27,169)
<CGS>                                           22,503                  16,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,987                   8,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   339                     (28)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,997                   3,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (980)                  1,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                       482                    (547)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (498)                    820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (498)                    820
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BERTRANGE DESAMOUR

, Appellant,

v.

GREGORY TONY, as Sheriff of Broward County

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1699

[ May 6, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Nicholas Richard Lopane , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19

- 6560

.

Divya Khullar of Khullar, P.A., Tamarac, for appellant.

Richard T. Woulfe and Brad J. Kimber of Billing, Cochra n, Lyles, Mauro

& Ramsey, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, D AMOORGIAN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.