alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006261EN.01000401.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen, Germany) — Alexander Jehle, Weinhaus Kiderlen v Land Baden-Württemberg

(Case C-489/04) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 1019/2002 - First paragraph of Article 2 - Olive oil and olive-pomace oil - Marketing standards - Retail trade - Presentation to the final consumer - So-called ‘bag in the box’ method)

(2006/C 261/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Alexander Jehle, Weinhaus Kiderlen

Applicants:

Defendant: Land Baden-Württemberg

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen — Interpretation of the first paragraph of Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1019/2002 of 13 June 2002 on marketing standards for olive oil (OJ 2002 L 155, p. 27) — Presentation of olive oils and olive-pomace oils to final consumers in pre-sealed packaging having a maximum capacity of five litres — Possibility of selling olive oil which is presented in a five-litre ‘Bag in the Box’ and which consumers draw off in smaller amounts within the shop

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1019/2002 of 13 June 2002 on marketing standards for olive oil, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1176/2003 of 1 July 2003, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 2 thereof, must be construed as meaning that olive oils and olive-pomace oils may be presented to the final consumer only in packaging which complies with the requirements laid down by that provision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1019/2002 of 13 June 2002 on marketing standards for olive oil, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1176/2003 of 1 July 2003, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 2 thereof, must be construed as meaning that olive oils and olive-pomace oils may be presented to the final consumer only in packaging which complies with the requirements laid down by that provision.

| 2. | The first paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation No 1019/2002, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1176/2003, must be construed as prohibiting a method of marketing, such as that used by the applicant in the main proceedings, which does not meet the conditions laid down by that provision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The first paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation No 1019/2002, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1176/2003, must be construed as prohibiting a method of marketing, such as that used by the applicant in the main proceedings, which does not meet the conditions laid down by that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 19.2.2005.

1

---
§ 146.4 General provisions for all participating flocks and slaughter plants. ( a ) Records that establish the identity of products handled shall be maintained in a manner satisfactory to the Official State Agency.
( b ) Material that is used to advertise products shall be subject to inspection by the Official State Agency at any time.
( c ) Advertising must be in accordance with the Plan, and applicable rules and regulations of the Official State Agency and the Federal Trade Commission. A participant advertising products as being of any official classification may include in their advertising reference to associated or franchised slaughter or production facilities only when such facilities produce products of the same classification.
( d ) Each participant shall be assigned a permanent approval number by the Service. This number, prefaced by the numerical code of the State, will be the official approval number of the participant and may be used on each certificate, invoice, shipping label, or other document used by the participant in the sale of the participant's products. Each Official State Agency which requires an approval number for out-of-State participants to ship into its State shall honor this number.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0007) [71 FR 56328, Sept. 26, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 10658, Mar. 9, 2010]
# C_2014111EN.01001301.xml

| 12.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/13 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to open winding-up proceedings in respect of AIM Általános Biztosító Zrt. ‘f.a.’

(Publication made in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

(2014/C 111/07)

| Insurance undertaking | AIM Általános Biztosító Zrt. ‘f.a.’ Budapest Könyves Kálmán krt. 11. 1097 MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY | AIM Általános Biztosító Zrt. ‘f.a.’ | Budapest | Könyves Kálmán krt. 11. | 1097 | MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY |
| ------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | -------- | ----------------------- | ---- | -------------------- |
| AIM Általános Biztosító Zrt. ‘f.a.’ | | | | | | |
| Budapest | | | | | | |
| Könyves Kálmán krt. 11. | | | | | | |
| 1097 | | | | | | |
| MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY | | | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of the decision | 15 January 2014
Entry into force: 20 February 2014
Compulsory liquidation order with appointment of liquidator | | | | | |
| Competent authorities | Metropolitan Tribunal Budapest Varsányi Irén u. 40-44. 1027 MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY | Metropolitan Tribunal | Budapest | Varsányi Irén u. 40-44. | 1027 | MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY |
| Metropolitan Tribunal | | | | | | |
| Budapest | | | | | | |
| Varsányi Irén u. 40-44. | | | | | | |
| 1027 | | | | | | |
| MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY | | | | | | |
| Supervisory authority | Hungarian Central Bank Budapest Krisztina krt. 39. 1013 MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY | Hungarian Central Bank | Budapest | Krisztina krt. 39. | 1013 | MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY |
| Hungarian Central Bank | | | | | | |
| Budapest | | | | | | |
| Krisztina krt. 39. | | | | | | |
| 1013 | | | | | | |
| MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY | | | | | | |
| Liquidator appointed | Hitelintézeti Felszámoló Nonprofit Kft. Budapest Damjanich u. 11-15. 1071 MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY Tel. +36 13210116 Email: kht@enternet.hu | Hitelintézeti Felszámoló Nonprofit Kft. | Budapest | Damjanich u. 11-15. | 1071 | MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY |
| Hitelintézeti Felszámoló Nonprofit Kft. | | | | | | |
| Budapest | | | | | | |
| Damjanich u. 11-15. | | | | | | |
| 1071 | | | | | | |
| MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY | | | | | | |
| Tel. +36 13210116 | | | | | | |
| Email: kht@enternet.hu | | | | | | |
| Applicable law | Hungary
Part Nine of Act LX of 2003 on Insurance Institutions and the Insurance Business
Act XLIX of 1991 on Bankruptcy Proceedings and Liquidation Proceedings | | | | | |

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                          CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES CORPORATION

                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of CenterPoint Properties Corporation on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-90374,
33-95792, 33-99858 and 333-18235),  Form S-8/S-3 (File No. 333-05087) and
Form S-8 (File No. 333-05141) of our reports dated February 13, 1997, except
for Notes 17 and 18, as to which the date is March 6, 1997, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of
CenterPoint Properties Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996
and 1995, and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996,
which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.








Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 1997
#### § 9002.4 Eligible candidates.

*Eligible candidates* means those Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates who have met all applicable conditions for eligibility to receive payments from the Fund under 11 CFR part 9003.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 679 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 15, 2000.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the House to join 
a similiar committee appointed by the Senate, to wait upon the President of the 
United States and inform him that the two Houses have completed their business 
of the session and are ready to adjourn, unless the President has some other 
communication to make to them.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-69740, 333-87538, 33-90730, 33-91084,
333-43317, 333-43319 and 333-61339), and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-94542,
333-10221 and 333-84537) of Glimcher Realty Trust of our report dated February
13, 2003, except for Note 20, as to which the date is March 12, 2003, relating
to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appears in
this Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC


Columbus, Ohio
March 21, 2002
§ 124.30 Filing, format, and content of petitions. ( a ) Any interested person may file a petition with APHIS, no later than 180 days after the publication of a regulatory review period determination under § 124.21, alleging that a license applicant did not act with due diligence in seeking APHIS approval of the product during the regulatory review period.
( b ) The petition must be filed with APHIS under the docket number of the Federal Register notice of the agency's regulatory review period determination. The petition must contain any additional information required by this subpart.
( c ) The petition must allege that the applicant failed to act with due diligence sometime during the regulatory review period and must set forth sufficient facts to merit an investigation by APHIS of whether the applicant acted with due diligence.
( d ) The petition must contain a certification that the petitioner has served a true and complete copy of the petition on interested parties by certified or registered mail (return receipt requested) or by personal delivery.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the
Company), for the three and six months ended June 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stewart York, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stewart York       
|Stewart York           
|Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# C_2007038EN.01000102.xml

| 22.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4418 — Nycomed Group/Altana Pharma)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 38/02)

On 13 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4418. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4418. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0001005229
<NAME>                  COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                              17,132
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      131,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,186
<INVENTORY>                                        103,885
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   284,613
<PP&E>                                             116,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                      35,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     752,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               94,306
<BONDS>                                            443,738
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               137
<OTHER-SE>                                         176,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       752,873
<SALES>                                            168,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   168,634
<CGS>                                              126,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      126,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    23,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     10,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5,078
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,085
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,085
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .38
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council, September 19, 2011, 
8:30 a.m. to September 19, 2011, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 
Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/E2, Bethesda, 
MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal Register on February 7, 
2011, 76 FR 6627.
    The afternoon meeting of the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 
Subcommittee will be open to the public from 1 p.m. to adjournment. It 
was erroneously published as a closed meeting.

    Dated: February 17, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4173 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2007095EN.01003502.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/35

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-124/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 95/69)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

1

---
exv10w35






June 9, 2008




Via Email

Stephen Hayden

Hayden Capital Corp.

2331 — 4th Avenue NW

Calgary, AB

T2N 0P1




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Re:
	 	Notice of Extension

Convertible Promissory Notes dated February 5, 2008






Dear Mr. Hayden,



On behalf of Ecology Coatings, Inc., please consider this letter the collective exercise of the
options to extend the terms of the aforementioned promissory notes for extension period of one (1)
month. In accordance with the terms of the notes, I have enclosed three (3) warrants to purchase a
combined Two Hundred ten thousand (210,000) shares of the Company’s common stock as the extension
fee. Should there be any questions pertaining to this matter or if you need any additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me.



Thank you for your time in addressing this matter.




	 	 	 
	 

	 	Yours very truly,
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Adam S. Tracy
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Adam S. Tracy, Esq.

Vice President, General Counsel






cc




Richard D. Stromback




enc (3)
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, José A. Segrera, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K/A forthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Terremark Worldwide, Inc.     /s/ José A. Segrera           José A. Segrera *Executive Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer* *(Principal Accounting Officer)*Dated: August 5, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to request approval on a new and/or currently approved information collection.

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before May 6, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

Send all comments regarding whether this information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, whether the burden estimates are accurate, and if there are ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the collection, to Barbara Brannan, Management Analyst, Office of Surety Guarantees, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Barbara Brannan, Office of Surety Guarantees, 202-205-6545,                         *Barbara.brannan@sba.gov*. Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030                         *curtis.rich@sba.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

SBA's Surety Bond Guarantee (SBG) Program was established to encourage Surety Companies to provide bonding for small contractors. The information collected on these forms is used to evaluate the eligibility of small contractors for the SBG Program.

*Title:*                     “Surety Bond Guarantee Assistance.”                

*Description of Respondents:*                     Surety Companies.                

*Form Number:*                     990, 991, 994, 994B, 994F, 994H.                

*Annual Responses:*                     17,965.                

*Annual Burden:*                     1,959.                

Jacqueline White,

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. 2011-5042 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
1

VonDemHagen, Rebecca

From: Steve Slavik <sslavik@diversifoam.com>

Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 3:22 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy

Cc: atsheppard.margaret@epa.gov; VonDemHagen, Rebecca; 'Ben Sachs'

Subject: Hydrofluorocarbons Regulation

 

 

 

Dear Ms.Newburg,

 

My	name	is	Steve	Slavik;	I	am	the	Vice	President	of	Operations	for	DiversiFoam	Products,	in	Rockford,	

Minnesota.		We	have	been	manufacturing	extruded	polystyrene	foam	insulation	since	1985	and	employ	

about	90	people.		I	am	writing	to	you	because	I	recently	became	aware	of	the	President’s	Climate	Action	

Plan	(CAP)	and	its	effort	to	reduce	the	emissions	of	hydrofluorocarbons	(HFC’s).			We	are	currently	using	

HFC’s	as	a	blowing	agent	to	make	our	insulation	boards	and	are	not	aware	of	any	feasible	alternative	to	

replace	them.		One	of	the	greatest	challenges	for	our	small	company	is	the	limited	technical	resources	we	have	

available.		If	HFC’s	are	eliminated	we	will	have	to	completely	rely	on	our	suppliers	to	develop	a	feasible	

alternative	and	if	they	are	successful	it	will	require	a	significant	amount	of	time	and	money	for	us	to	make	the	

conversion,		including	having	to	redesign	screws,	barrels,	dies,	metering	equipment	and	storage	equipment.			

In	addition,	we	will	have	to	retest	our	finished	products	to	ensure	compliance	with	the	building	codes	and	

apply	for	an	operating	permit	modification	from	our	Pollution	Control	Agency.			

It	would	be	greatly	appreciated	if	you	would	take	into	account	our	concerns	when	considering	the	regulation	

of	HFC’s.

 

Sincerely,

 

Steve Slavik

Vice President of Operations

DiversiFoam Product

763 477 3215