alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006154EN.01002002.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/20

---

Action brought on 28 April 2006 — Kapman v OHIM (representation of a saw blade in blue)

(Case T-127/06)

(2006/C 154/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Kapman A.B. (Sandviken, Sweden) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal at OHIM of 10 February 2006 in Case R 303/2004-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal at OHIM of 10 February 2006 in Case R 303/2004-2;

| — | order the Office to refund the appeal fee to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office to refund the appeal fee to the applicant;

| — | order the Office to pay the costs of the dispute, including those relating to the procedure before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office to pay the costs of the dispute, including those relating to the procedure before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: A figurative mark representing a saw blade in blue for goods in class 8 [saw blades (for hand-operated tools)] — application No 2 532 497

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as among others the combination of shape and colour causes an outstanding visual impression to the relevant public, i.e. professional handymen and not to the average consumer.

Pleas in law:

---
### §2112. Promotion year; defined

For the purposes of this chapter, "promotion year" means the period which commences on July 1 of each year and ends on June 30 of the following year.

(Added Pub. L. 94–546, §1(17), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2520, §256a; renumbered §2112, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §112(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 256a of this title as this section.
| Date:  May 29, 2014 | By     /s/ Chris Ballinger |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                          |    Chris Ballinger                   |
|                          |     Senior Vice President and   |
|                          |   Chief Financial Officer                 |

| 156  |
|-----------|
Exhibit 15.1













Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To
the Shareholders and the Board of Directors
BBVA Banco Francés S.A.:



We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-219100 on Form F-3 of BBVA Banco Francés
S.A. of our reports dated May 10, 2019, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of BBVA Banco Francés
S.A. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017, and the related consolidated
statements of profit or loss, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, which reports appear in the December 31, 2018 annual report
on Form 20-F of the Company.



Our
report dated May 10, 2019 on the consolidated financial statements refers to a change in accounting for financial instruments
due to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standard 9, Financial Instruments.



Our
report dated May 10, 2019 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, expresses
our opinion that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 because
of the effect of two material weaknesses on achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph
that states such material weaknesses related to ineffective design and implementation and timely operation of certain process level controls over the determination of loan losses under IFRS 9 and ineffective design of certain controls over the completeness and accuracy of certain financial statements disclosures required under IFRS, specifically IFRS 9, IFRS 7 and IAS 29.



/s/
KPMG



Buenos
Aires, Argentina
May 10, 2019
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report**** 
SuDocNumber: HE 20.3199/3:
ItemNumber:0507-G-60(online)
CGPSystem Number:000598862
 
2000/2001(html)
2001/2002(pdf)**
#### § 201.73 Scale operators to be qualified.

Stockyard owners, market agencies, dealers, packers, and live poultry dealers shall employ qualified persons to operate scales for weighing livestock, livestock carcasses, live poultry, or feed for the purposes of purchase, sale, acquisition, payment, or settlement of livestock, livestock carcasses, or live poultry, and they shall require such employees to operate the scales in accordance with the regulations in this part.

[65 FR 17763, Apr. 5, 2000]
FERC EIS-0205 Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Docket No.

CP06-449-000

January 2007
# C_2006237EN.01002202.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/22

---

Action brought on 11 August 2006 — F v Commission

(Case F-94/06)

(2006/C 237/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: F (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. Van Rossum, S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Director of DG ADMIN/C ‘Social welfare policy, Luxembourg staff, health, safety’ of 23 February 2006 to retire the applicant and to award him an invalidity allowance fixed in accordance with the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations, with retrospective effect from 1 February 2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Director of DG ADMIN/C ‘Social welfare policy, Luxembourg staff, health, safety’ of 23 February 2006 to retire the applicant and to award him an invalidity allowance fixed in accordance with the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations, with retrospective effect from 1 February 2002;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant a sum assessed on equitable principles at EUR 15 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant a sum assessed on equitable principles at EUR 15 000;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his application, the applicant puts forward very similar pleas to those in Case F-44/06 (1), which he also brought.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 154, 1.7.2006, p. 25.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


     Each of the undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly  Report of Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  AUGUST 10, 2007
        ---------------


                                             /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                             ---------------------
                                             Timothy T. Tevens
                                             Chief Executive Officer



                                             /S/ KAREN L. HOWARD
                                             -------------------
                                             Karen L. Howard
                                             Chief Financial Officer
§ 112.1 General. ( a ) Unless otherwise authorized or directed by the Administrator, each biological product prepared at a licensed establishment, or imported, shall be packaged and labeled as prescribed in this part before it is removed from the licensed establishment or presented for importation: *Provided,* That biological products to be imported for research and evaluation shall be subject to packaging and labeling requirements in § 112.9. *Provided further,* That, unless otherwise exempted, all preparation, including packaging and labeling, of biological products shall only be performed in a licensed establishment under an approved Outline of Production.
( b ) No person shall apply or affix to or include with, or cause to be applied or affixed to or included with, any carton or final container of a biological product, any label, stamp, mark or statement that is false or misleading in any particular, is not in compliance with the regulations, or is not approved by APHIS.
( c ) No person shall alter, mark or remove any approved labeling affixed to or included with any biological product prior to selling or otherwise distributing such product. In addition, no person shall mark any carton, other container, or final container of a biological product so as to falsify the labeling, make it misleading, or cause it to be illegible.
( d ) Labels that are stamped, printed or glued directly on cartons, other containers, or final containers shall be legible throughout the dating period. Biological products bearing labels, which have been altered, mutilated, destroyed, obliterated or removed, shall be withheld from the market.
[38 FR 12094, May 9, 1973, as amended at 59 FR 43445, Aug. 24, 1994]
### §197a. Resumption of business by closed bank on consent of depositors

In any case in which, in the opinion of the Comptroller of the Currency, it would be to the advantage of the depositors and unsecured creditors of any national banking association whose business has been closed, for such association to resume business upon the retention by the association, for a reasonable period to be prescribed by the Comptroller, of all or any part of its deposits, the Comptroller is authorized, in his discretion, to permit the association to resume business if depositors and unsecured creditors of the association representing at least 75 per centum of its total deposit and unsecured credit liabilities consent in writing to such retention of deposits. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect in any manner any powers of the Comptroller under the provisions of law in force on June 16, 1933, with respect to the reorganization of national banking associations.

(June 16, 1933, ch. 89, §29, 48 Stat. 193.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exception as to Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by any provision of law in Comptroller of the Currency, referred to in this section, not included in transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 1 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kareem Broxton, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 533]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered January 19, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree (five counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In determining the fairness and propriety of a trial court’s charge to a jury, the test is whether the jury, hearing the whole *491charge, would gather from its language the correct rules which should be applied in arriving at a decision (see *People v Russell,*266 NY 147, 153 [1934]; *cf. People v Lauderdale,*295 AD2d 539 [2002]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court’s charge, essentially quoting Penal Law § 20.00, properly instructed the jury on the standard for accessorial liability (see *People v Slacks,*90 NY2d 850 [1997]; *People v Delphin,*26 AD3d 343 [2006]; *People v Leach,*293 AD2d 760, 761 [2002]). Furthermore, the evidence elicited at trial supported the trial court’s incorporation of the “zone of danger” principles enunciated in *People v Russell*(91 NY2d 280, 288-289 [1998]), into its charge on accessorial liability.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the trial court gave insufficient instructions to the jury by failing to highlight a particular prosecution witness’s purported prior inconsistent statement to the police. The instruction that the prior inconsistent statement was to be used only in the evaluation of the witness’s credibility was proper and sufficiently apprised the jury as to the use of the particular witness’s prior statement to the police *(see People v Forte,*123 AD2d 641 [1986]; *see also People v Saunders,*64 NY2d 665, 667 [1984]; *People v McLean,*226 AD2d 396 [1996]).

In any event, any error in the trial court’s charge to the jury was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]). Florio, J.P, Schmidt, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur.
§ 316.5 Branding ink; to be furnished by official establishments; approval by Program; color. ( a ) The operator of each official establishment shall furnish all ink for marking products with the official marks at such establishment. Such ink must be made with harmless ingredients that are approved for the purpose by the Administrator. Samples of inks shall be submitted to the Program laboratory from time to time as may be deemed necessary by the inspector in charge.
( b ) Only ink approved for the purpose shall be used to apply ink brands bearing official marks to carcasses of cattle, sheep, swine, or goats and fresh meat cuts derived therefrom. Any ink containing F.D. & C. Violet No. 1 shall not be considered an approved ink within the meaning of this paragraph.
( c ) Green ink shall not be used to apply marks to carcasses of cattle, sheep, swine, or goats or fresh meat cuts derived therefrom.
( d ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, branding ink of any color, approved for the purpose by the Administrator in specific cases, may be used to apply ink brands, bearing official marks, to processed meat cuts derived from cattle, sheep, swine, or goats.
( e ) Only green ink approved for the purpose shall be used to apply ink brands bearing official marks to carcasses and parts of carcasses and meat cuts derived from horses, mules, and other equines.
( f ) Ink used must assure legibility and permanence of the markings and the color of ink shall provide acceptable contrast with the color of the product to which it is applied.
[35 FR 15577, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 38 FR 9088, Apr. 10, 1973]
#### § 11.6 Reporting debts.

DHS will report delinquent debts to credit bureaus and other automated databases in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3711(e), 31 CFR 901.4, and the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-129, “Policies for Federal Credit Programs and Non-tax Receivables,” which may be found at *http://www.fms.treas.gov/debt.* At least sixty (60) days prior to reporting a delinquent debt to a consumer reporting agency, DHS sends a notice to the debtor in accordance with 6 CFR 11.3. DHS may authorize the Treasury Department's Financial Management Service to report to credit bureaus those delinquent debts that have been transferred to the Financial Management Service for administrative offset.
### §302. Rules, regulations, and orders

The Secretary may make such rules, regulations, and orders as he deems necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this chapter. Any rules, regulations, or orders issued pursuant to this authority may be established in such form or manner, may contain such classifications or differentiations, and may provide for such adjustments and reasonable exceptions as in the judgment of the Secretary are necessary or proper to effectuate the purpose of this chapter, or to prevent circumvention or evasion of any rule, regulation, or order issued hereunder. The Secretary may also provide by rule or regulation, for such confidentiality, publication, or disclosure, of information collected hereunder as he may deem necessary or appropriate in the public interest. Rules, regulations, and orders, or amendments thereto shall have the concurrence of the Secretary of the Treasury prior to promulgation.

(Added Pub. L. 87–826, §2, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 951.)
# C_2010195EN.01000301.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 16 April 2010 — Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (GENESIS) v Boys Toys S.A., Administración del Estado

(Case C-190/10)

2010/C 195/04

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (GENESIS)

Applicant:

Defendant: Boys Toys S.A. y Administración del Estado

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

May Article 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark be interpreted in such a way as to enable account to be taken not only of the day but also of the hour and minute of filing of an application for registration of a Community trade mark with OHIM (provided that such information has been recorded) for the purposes of establishing temporal priority over a national trade mark application filed on the same day, where the national legislation governing the registration of national trade marks considers the time of filing to be relevant?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ramsey K. Hamadi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                      |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 9, 2005 |  | /s/ Ramsey K. Hamadi
|                  |  | Name:                |  | Ramsey K. Hamadi       
|                  |  | Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
      10.3

    


    ADDENDUM
      TO SECURED BRIDGE LOAN PROMISSORY NOTES OF SINGLE TOUCH INTERACTIVE, INC. DATED
      MARCH 17, 2008 ($250,000); MARCH 31, 2008 ($1,650,000) AND APRIL 28, 2008
      ($345,000) ISSUED TO SINGLE TOUCH SYSTEMS INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HOSTING SITE
      NETWORK, INC.)

    


    


    This
      Addendum is made and entered into as of the 29th
      day of
      May 2008. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this
      Addendum shall have the meaning given to them as in the Secured Bridge Loan
      Promissory Notes.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants contained herein and
      intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto agree as
      follows:

    


    1.    Section
      1
      of the Secured Bridge Loan Promissory Notes is amended to read as
      follows:

    


    “1. The
      outstanding principal balance of this Note, together with accrued and unpaid
      interest thereon, shall be due and payable on June 30, 2008 (the “Due Date”),
      which Due Date may be extended by the Borrower and the Lender in writing;
provided,
      however,
      that
      upon the consummation of a merger between the Borrower and the Lender, or an
      affiliate of the Lender (the “Merger”), all indebtedness evidenced hereby shall
      be deemed canceled and paid in full”.

    


    2.    All
      other
      terms of the Secured Bridge Loan Promissory Notes shall continue with full
      force
      and effect.

    


    3.    This
      Addendum may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall
      be
      deemed to be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute
      one
      and the same agreement.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum has been executed by the Parties as of the date
      first above written:

    


    
      	 	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH INTERACTIVE, INC.

            
	 	 
	 	
              By: 
                /s/
                Anthony Macaluso

              
                

              

              Name: Anthony
                Macaluso

            
	 	
              Title: Chief
                Executive Officer

            
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH SYSTEMS INC.

              (FKA
                HOSTING SITE NETWORK, INC.).

            
	 	 
	 	
              By: 
                /s/
                Scott Vicari

              
                

              

              Name: Scott
                Vicari

            
	 	
              Title: President
LIMDEP nlogit migrants 316 triangular.txt

File Name: LIMDEP nlogit migrants 316 triangular.lim Author: Robert Johnston, Clark University Created: August 27,2009 Purpose: LIMDEP program for estimating the model for the nonuse benefits transfer.

RESET $ READ ; File ="D:\Rob Johnston\EPA STAR Project\Data\Formatted Data\Final Data\Final Usable Data\migrants_lim_final2.xls" ; Format = XLS ; Names $ CALC ; Ran(1) $ CREATE ; cost = -cost $ CREATE ; ne = neither $ NLOGIT ; Lhs = CHOICE

; Choices = A,B,N

; Rhs = ne, acres, migrant, catch, wild, access, ibi, cost

; RPL ; Fcn = ne(N), acres(N), migrant(N), access(N), catch(N), wild(N), ibi(N), cost(T,1)

; Parameters ; Pds = group_nu ; Pts = 100 ; Maxit = 1000 ; Halton $

Page 1