alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 256.17 How long will I have to wait for work on my house? How long it takes to do work on your house depends on: ( a ) Your position on the priority list;
( b ) Whether funds are available;
( c ) The type of work to be done;
( d ) The climate and seasonal conditions where your house is located;
( e ) The availability of a contractor; and
( f ) Other unforeseen factors, such as infrastructure availability.
§ 17.115 Assurance required. ( a ) *General.* Either at the application stage or the award stage, Federal agencies must ensure that applications for Federal financial assistance or awards of Federal financial assistance contain, be accompanied by, or be covered by a specifically identified assurance from the applicant or recipient, satisfactory to the designated agency official, that each education program or activity operated by the applicant or recipient and to which these Title IX regulations apply will be operated in compliance with these Title IX regulations. An assurance of compliance with these Title IX regulations shall not be satisfactory to the designated agency official if the applicant or recipient to whom such assurance applies fails to commit itself to take whatever remedial action is necessary in accordance with § 17.110(a) to eliminate existing discrimination on the basis of sex or to eliminate the effects of past discrimination whether occurring prior to or subsequent to the submission to the designated agency official of such assurance.
( b ) *Duration of obligation.* ( 1 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide real property or structures thereon, such assurance shall obligate the recipient or, in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structures are used to provide an education program or activity.
( 2 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide personal property, such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.
( 3 ) In all other cases such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended.
( c ) *Form.* ( 1 ) The assurances required by paragraph (a) of this section, which may be included as part of a document that addresses other assurances or obligations, shall include that the applicant or recipient will comply with all applicable Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683, 1685-1688).
( 2 ) The designated agency official will specify the extent to which such assurances will be required of the applicant's or recipient's subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, or successors in interest.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CEO CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC§1350, as adopted), Joel A. Ronning,the Chief Executive Officer of DigitalRiver, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

**1.****                                     **TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2004, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

**2.****                                     **Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company forthe periods presented therein.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 6th day ofAugust 2004.

 
|   | /s/ Joel A. Ronning     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                    |
|   | Joel  A. Ronning        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Digital River, Inc. and will beretained by Digital River, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
|   | Subsidiaries of the Company | Exhibit 8.1 |
|--------|-----------------------------|-------------|

| Subsidiary                                                                                                    | Jurisdiction of Incorporation | Principal Activity                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                          |                          |                                       |
| BBVA Francés Asset Management  S.A. Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de Inversión  | Republic of Argentina         | Mutual funds                               |
| BBVA Francés Valores S.A.                                                                           | Republic of Argentina         | Stock exchange brokerage                   |
| Consolidar AFJP S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings)                                                | Republic of Argentina         | Pension and Retirement Fund Administrators |
| PSA Finance  Argentina Compañía Financiera S.A.                                      | Republic of Argentina         | Financial Institution                      |
#### POSTON v. MORGAN-SCHULTHEISS, INC.

No. 106P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 142

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1990.
U.S.Deportment

of Transportation

Office of the Secretory

of Transportation

Assistant Secretary

1200 New Jersey Avenue, Sf

Washington, DC 20~$O

MAY 3.0 2014

Dear Mayor Gill:

The Honorable Laurie Gill

Mayor of the City of Pierre

222 East Dakota Ave.

P.O. Box 1253

Pierre, SD 57501-1253

Thank you for your recent Jetter regarding Great Lake Aviation's (Great Lakes) service at

Pierre. In the letter, you urge the Department of Trans ortation (the Department) to issue a

Request for Proposals for replacement service on the g ounds that Great Lakes' service is

unreliable and is not meeting your community's Essen lal Air Service (EAS) needs.

We are aware of Great Lakes' operational problems th t have been caused by a lack of pilots due

in part to recent statutory and regulatory changes invol -ing pilot training requirements and the

carrier's implementation of the changes. You are right that Great Lakes' service problems are,

not limited to Pierre; rather, the carrier's service has su fered system-wide. . .

In response to the severe pilot shortage, which is not Ii ited to Great Lakes, the carrier has taken

some rather drastic measures. During the first quarter f2014, it suspended or terminated

service at 13 subsidized EAS communities and an addi ional number of non-EAS communities.

In addition, as of April 1, Great Lakes began to operate Beech 1900 aircraft that have been

reconfigured for 9 seats in order to more effectively uti ize the pilots it has on staff. The

reconfigured aircraft are intended to more quickly utili e new pilots that it has hired as a result of

the increased attrition that hampered its ability to opera e a full schedule in the first quarter of

2014. Great Lakes has indicated to us that it is workin well and the carrier has expanded the

reconfiguration to more aircraft in its fleet.

I, along with the EAS program staff, met with Great L es in Washington, D.C. in late March in

an attempt to gather more information on their current perations and what the carrier intends to

do moving forward to improve its operation.

The Department will be monitoring GreatLakes' servic over the next few weeks and if we do

not see improvement, we will consider taking steps that may be necessary to ameliorate the
-2-

effects of their service reductions, cancellations; and hardship on the community, including the

possibility of issuing a Request for Proposals as you recommend.

A copy of this letter will be placed in Pierre's docket (Docket DOT-OST-2011-0138) on

www.regulations.gov. .

Sincerely,

~-M~~

~/tL Susan L. Kurland

Assistant Secretary for

Aviation and International Affairs
#### § 114.6 Mixing biological products.

Each biological product, when in liquid form, shall be mixed thoroughly in a single container. During bottling operations, the product shall be constantly mixed sufficient to maintain physical uniformity of the entire fill. A serial number, with any other markings that may be necessary for ready identification of the serial, shall be applied to identify it with the records of preparation and labeling.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

Nos. 08-2289, 08-2290, 08-2291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

EPIFANIO MATOS-LUCHI, MANOLO SOTO-PÉREZ,

RAMÓN CARRASCO-CARRASCO,

Defendants, Appellants.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on December 1, 2010, should

be amended as follows.

On page 5, last line on page, insert "of" between "background"

and "the".
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301Bellevue Parkway 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilmington, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 10th Floor, MC 482-B10-A68 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-2 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0503 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 032 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model BO - 105A, BO - 105C, and BO - 105S Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 97 He licopters in the US Registry. Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect oil contamination in the main gearbox ( MGB), which if not detected, could result in MGB deterioration, MGB failure, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 225,000 (for main transmission replacement) Labor per Helicopter ( 2 x $ 8 5 /work-hour for inspecting & cleaning ) (4 x $85/work-hour for flushing & re - inspecting) (40 x $85/work- hour for replacing the main transmisstion) $ 170 per cy cle $340 per cycle $3,400 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : **Rao Edupuganti**
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1030 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1030

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2000

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide that the conveyance by the Bureau of Land Management of the 
surface estate to certain land in the State of Wyoming in exchange for 
 certain private land will not result in the removal of the land from 
                     operation of the mining laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 60 BAR LAND EXCHANGE.

    (a) In General.--Sections 2201.1-2(d) and 2091.3-2(c) of title 43 
Code of Federal Regulations, shall not apply in the case of the 
conveyance by the Secretary of the Interior of the land described in 
subsection (b) in exchange for approximately 9,480 acres of land in 
Campbell County, Wyoming, pursuant to the terms of the Cow Creek/60 Bar 
land exchange, WYW-143315.
    (b) Land Description.--The land described in this subsection 
comprises the following land in Campbell and Johnson Counties, Wyoming:
            (1) Approximately 2,960 acres of land in the tract known as 
        the ``Bill Barlow Ranch'';
            (2) Approximately 2,315 acres of land in the tract know as 
        the ``T-Chair Ranch'';
            (3) Approximately 3,948 acres of land in the tract known as 
        the ``Bob Christensen Ranch'';
            (4) Approximately 11,609 acres of land in the tract known 
        as the ``John Christensen Ranch''.
    (c) Segregation From Entry.--Land acquired by the United States in 
the exchange under subsection (a) shall be segregated from entry under 
the mining laws until appropriate land use planning is completed for 
the land.

            Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### § 126.7 Function of TSOB Review Panel.

A TSOB Review Panel reviews an ALJ's decision regarding a Determination of Security Threat issued by the TSA Administrator and may affirm, modify, or reverse the ALJ's decision. The TSOB Review Panel also may remand the matter to the ALJ with instructions to address particular issues or consider additional testimony or evidence.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

      ( print page 12757)    
                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *John R. Cumbie,*                     Civil No. 2:08-CV-01825-RMG, was lodged with the United States District of South Carolina on March 1, 2011.                

                    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against Defendant John R. Cumbie, pursuant to Sections 301 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 1344, to obtain injunctive relief and impose civil penalties against Defendant for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging fill material into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring Defendant to restore the impacted areas and to perform mitigation and to pay a civil penalty. The proposed Consent Decree also provides for Defendant to perform a supplemental environmental project. The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Martin F. McDermott, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Environmental Defense Section, P.O. Box 23986, Washington, DC 20026-3986, and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *John R. Cumbie,*                     Civil No. 2:08-CV-01825-RMG, DJ # 90-5-1-1-17164.                

The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Hollings Judicial Center, Meeting Street at Broad, Charleston, SC 29401.

                    In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at                     *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​Consent_​Decrees.html.*

Maureen M. Katz,

Assistant Section Chief, Environment & Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-5087 Filed 3-7-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-11179

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TONY ORLANDO ARMSTRONG,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CR-414-R

- - - - - - - - - -

May 16, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Tony Armstrong has appealed the sentence to a 300-

month prison term which he received for bank robbery, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The maximum prison term

provided by the statute for this offense is 20 years. The

district court concluded that Armstrong’s sentencing range as a

career offender was from 262 to 327 months in prison.

A defendant’s sentence may not exceed the maximum statutory
No. 95-11179

- 2 -

limit provided for the offense of which he was convicted. United

States v. Collins, 40 F.3d 95, 101 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied,

115 S. Ct. 1986 (1995). “Where the statutorily authorized

maximum sentence is less than the minimum of the applicable

guideline range, the statutorily authorized maximum sentence

shall be the guideline sentence.” U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1(a). 

Accordingly, Armstrong’s sentence is vacated and the cause is

remanded for him to be resentenced to a 240-month prison term. 

See United States v. Stephenson, 887 F.2d 57, 62 (5th Cir. 1989).

VACATED AND REMANDED.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ORGANIZATION OF CORPORATIONS TO DO FOREIGN BANKING
Letter with Dominique Baly dated June 10, 2008



 Exhibit 10.1 
  

	
	June 10, 2008


 Dominique Baly 
 President, Bioscience Division 
 Dear Dominique: 
 As per our agreement, effective today, your employment with Millipore will terminate on December 31, 2008 and your termination will be governed by the Officer Severance Agreement dated September 13, 2007
between you and the company. 
 If the above accurately describes our agreement, please sign, date and return this letter. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Martin Madaus

	Martin Madaus, Ph.D.
	Chairman, President and CEO


  

	
	Agreed:
	
	 /s/ Dominique Baly

	Dominique Baly
	
	Date: June 10, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7266 HENRY WATSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. ALLEN, M.D., Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-7388 HENRY WATSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. ALLEN, M.D., Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-504-BR) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 19972 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant, a North Carolina, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Watson v. Allen , No. CA-96-504-BR (E.D.N.C. July 30, 1996). We modify the district court's order to reflect that thedismissal is without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Michael P. Huseby, the Chief Financial Officer of Renaissance Media
Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC
and Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (collectively, the Company) in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (the Report)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Michael P. HusebyMichael P. HusebyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 17, 2004
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Manchester United plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joel Glazer, Executive Co-Chairman of the Company and Principal Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (i)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: 24 October 2013  By:
/s/ Joel   GlazerJoel GlazerExecutive   Co-Chairman(Principal   Executive Officer)