alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) COHNREZNICK 

ACCOUNTING∙ TAX ∙ ADVISORY

 

CohnReznickLLP

**cohnreznick.com**

 

 

Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

TorchlightLoan Services, LLC

 

Wehave examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management'sCertification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SECRegulation AB, that Torchlight Loan Services, LLC (the “Company” and the“Asserting Party”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in paragraph(d) Item 1122 of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for thespecial servicing platform (“Platform”) for commercial mortgage-backedsecurities transactions that were issued on or after December 1, 2002, forwhich the Company acted as special servicer as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2017 (except for the servicing criteria described in the followingparagraph). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertionabout the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on ourexamination.

 

Managementhas determined that the criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii),(d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(iv),(d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii),(d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities performed bythe Company, as a special servicer, with respect to the Company's Platform. Thecommercial mortgage-backed securities transactions covered by this Platform arethose specified in Appendix B in the accompanying Management's CertificationRegarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards establishedby the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Thosestandards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonableassurance about whether management’s assertion is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtainevidence about management’s assertion. The nature, timing, and extent of theprocedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of therisks of material misstatement of management’s assertion, whether due to fraudor error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient andappropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with theservicing criteria specified in the first paragraph.

 

Inour opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with theaforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,2017, for the commercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts Platform isfairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/CohnReznick LLP

Bethesda,Maryland

March2, 2018
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 84

Recognizing the positive steps and achievements of the Republic of India

and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to foster peaceful relations between

the two nations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. GILMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the positive steps and achievements of the Republic of India and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan

to foster peaceful relations between the two nations.

Whereas on February 22, 1999, the Prime Minister of India

and the Prime Minister of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan signed the ‘‘Lahore Declaration’’ to develop and secure a durable peace and to develop harmonious relations

and friendly cooperation between their two nations;

Whereas the Lahore Declaration states and affirms the commitment of the Republic of India and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to the objective of universal nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation;

Whereas the Republic of India and the Islamic Republic of

Pakistan have reaffirmed their commitment to continue
2

•HRES 84 IH

to abide by their respective unilateral moratorium on conducting further nuclear test explosions;

Whereas the Republic of India and the Islamic Republic of

Pakistan have agreed to take immediate steps to reduce

the risk of accidental or unauthorized use of nuclear

weapons;

Whereas the Republic of India and the Islamic Republic of

Pakistan have agreed to commence bilateral consultations

on security, disarmament and non-proliferation issues

within the context of negotiations on these issues in multilateral form; and

Whereas the Republic of India and the Islamic Republic of

Pakistan have reaffirmed their condemnation of terrorism

in all its forms and manifestations and their determination to combat this menace: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the significance and importance

3 of the Lahore Declaration as a step toward durable

4 peace and the development of harmonious relations

5 and friendly cooperation between the Republic of

6 India and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan; and

7 (2) supports the commitment of the Republic of

8 India and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to uni9 versal nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation, and

10 peaceful regional relations.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of 1st Net  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, James H.  Watson,  Jr.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



/s/ James H. Watson, Jr.
-------------------------
James H. Watson, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2002
### §§1749bbb–7 to 1749bbb–10. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1749bbb–7 to 1749bbb–10, comprising part B of this subchapter, were omitted in view of termination of powers of Director under this part on Nov. 30, 1983, pursuant to former section 1749bbb(b) of this title.

Section 1749bbb–7, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title XII, §1221, as added Pub. L. 90–448, title XI, §1103, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 560; amended Pub. L. 91–609, title VI, §602(c), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1789; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §452(b)(1)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1230, related to reinsurance of losses from riots or civil disorders.

Section 1749bbb–8, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title XII, §1222, as added Pub. L. 90–448, title XI, §1103, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 561; amended Pub. L. 91–152, title IV, §405, Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 396; Pub. L. 91–609, title VI, §602(e), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1790; Pub. L. 95–24, title I, §104(b), Apr. 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 56; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §452(b)(1)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1230; Pub. L. 98–479, title II, §203(i)(1), Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2230; Pub. L. 100–242, title V, §545(b), Feb. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1942, related to reinsurance agreements and premiums.

Section 1749bbb–9, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title XII, §1223, as added Pub. L. 90–448, title XI, §1103, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 562; amended Pub. L. 91–152, title IV, §406, Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 396; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §452(b)(1)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1230, related to conditions of reinsurance.

Section 1749bbb–10, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title XII, §1224, as added Pub. L. 90–448, title XI, §1103, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 563; amended Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §452(b)(1)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1230, related to recovery of premiums, jurisdiction, and statute of limitations.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2187** 

LINDA K. HUGGINS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
NC DEPT. OF ADMINISTRATION; NC HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:10

- cv - 00414

- FL )

Submitted : February 4, 2014 Decided: February 12, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Linda K. Huggins, Appellant Pro Se. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, Mary Ann Stone, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Linda K. Huggins appeals the district court ’ s order s accepting in part the recommendation s of the magistrate judge
and granting in part the Appellees’ motion to dismiss, granti ng the motion for summary judgment and dismissing Huggins’ employment discrimination complaint brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e

- 2000e

- 17
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordin gly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Huggins v. North Carolina Dep’t of Admin. , No.
5:10

- cv - 00414

- FL

- 1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2011; Sept. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### SISTARE v. HOISINGTON

No. 499P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 121

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4910]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of briefing cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 8, 2010 (75 FR 76396), the U.S. Commission on 
Civil Rights announced a briefing to be held on Friday, March 11, 2011 
at the Commission's headquarters. On March 1, 2011, the Commission 
cancelled the briefing. The details of the cancelled meeting are:

DATE AND TIME: Friday, March 11, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Briefing Agenda

    This briefing is open to the public.
    Topic: The Civil Rights Implications of Eminent Domain Abuse.

I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman;
II. Speakers' Presentations;
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director;
IV. Adjourn Briefing.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: March 1, 2011.
Kimberly Tolhurst,
Senior Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-4910 Filed 3-2-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
## Enlaces de accesibilidad

      - Ir al contenido principal
      - Ir a la navegación principal
      - Ir a la búsqueda

## 

This image contains sensitive content which some people may find offensive or disturbing.

### Print Options:

              -    Images 
              -    Multimedia 
              -    Embedded Content 
              -    Comments 

-    Cuba  CubaDerechos HumanosEconomíaInmigraciónContra la censura 
-  Estados Unidos 
-  América Latina 
-  Mundo 
-  Deportes 
-  Arte y Entretenimiento 
-  Audiovisuales Martí 
-  Radio Martí 
-    Especiales  EspecialesLa realidad de la vivienda en CubaKentu-CubanoLos Santos de HialeahSer viejo en CubaDesinformación rusa en América LatinaLa invasión de Rusia a Ucrania#ContraDesinformaciónRusa 
-  Multimedia 
-  Editoriales 

##### Síguenos 

EN VIVO
| **INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (Details)** | Jun. 30, 2013 | Jun. 30, 2012 |
|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 6             | 7             |
| Series One [Member]                                 |          |          |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0             | 0             |
| Series Two [Member]                                 |          |          |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0             | 0             |
| Series Three [Member]                               |          |          |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 6             | 7             |
| Series Four [Member]                                |          |          |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0             | 0             |
| Series Five [Member]                                |          |          |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0             | 0             |
| Series Six [Member]                                 |          |          |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0             | 0             |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Number of operating partnerships.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**bctc_NumberOfOperatingPartnerships**Namespace Prefix:**bctc_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
SCWC-14-0001016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
MICKEY A. MADDOX, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. MAUI POLICE DEPARTMENT; CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0001016; CIV. NO. 13-1-0900(1))
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the application for writ of certiorari, filed on April 6, 2015, and the record, it appears that the Intermediate Court of Appeals (“ICA”) did not gravely err in entering its March 5, 2015 order dismissing Petitioner’s appeal inasmuch as the circuit court did not reduce the June 12, 2014 order of dismissal and the June 30, 2014 order denying the motion to set aside the order of dismissal and reinstate the action to a judgment on a separate document. As noted by the ICA, and consistent with Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai # i 115, 869 P.2d 1334 (1994) and HRCP Rule 58, Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001016 14-MAY-2015 08:12 AMthe circuit court’s June 12, 2014 and June 30, 2014 orders are

required to be reduced by the circuit court to a separate judgment in order to, inter alia, permit an appeal from these orders. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of certiorari is rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 14, 2015. Mickey A. Maddox, petitioner pro se /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
# C_2007011EN.01000302.xml

| 17.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4444 — GE/Banque Artesia Nederland)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 11/05)

On 7 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4444. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4444. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.307

## Section §107.307: General

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.307 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8502

CHARLIE J. PERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C. G. WILLIAMS, JR., Sheriff,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-95-1563-AM)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 2, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie J. Perry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Perry v. Williams, No. CA-95-1563-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 9,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-  Home 
-  About 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

# Frequently Asked Questions Based on Letters of Interpretation

                      - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                      - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                      - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements
-  Home 
-  Training 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Outreach & Engagement 
                      -  Training Requirements for Industry 
                      -  Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG) 
                      -  Workshops 
                      -  Webinars 
                      -  Community Liaisons (CLs) 
                      -  Publications 
                      -  Publicaciones (en español) 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  Training Modules 
                      -  Videos and Mobile Apps 
                      -  Contact Us 

# PHMSA's Quarterly Hazmat Newsletter 

*Hazardous Matters* is PHMSA's quarterly newsletter for hazardous materials safety. Every quarter, this publication consolidates timely information on our latest rulemaking activities, upcoming workshops and webinars, newest publications, and other highlights from PHMSA's current safety initiatives.

Click here to subscribe, so you never miss an issue!

Read the current issue: April - June 2024

### Archive

January - March 2024

October - December 2023

July 2023

April - June 2023

January – March 2023

October – December 2022

July-September 2022: Special Issue on Lithium Batteries

April – June 2022

January – March 2022

October - December 2021