alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Organization 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Central Region

## About the Office

The Central Regional Office, based in Kansas City, MO, is comprised of personnel from the Office of Pipeline Safety and the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety. The offices are charged with overseeing the safe and secure movement of daily shipments of hazardous materials by all modes of transportation, as well as ensuring the safe, reliable, and environmentally sound operation of the nation's pipeline infrastructure.

The area of responsibility for this region is listed below; however, the jurisdiction of PHMSA staff is nationwide and not limited to their regional area of responsibility.

States: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin

## Contact Information

## Management
### §361. Bills receivable, bills of exchange, acceptances; regulations by Board of Governors

The discount and rediscount and the purchase and sale by any Federal reserve bank of any bills receivable and of domestic and foreign bills of exchange, and of acceptances authorized by this chapter, shall be subject to such restrictions, limitations, and regulations as may be imposed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §13 (par.), 38 Stat. 264; Sept. 7, 1916, ch. 461, 39 Stat. 753; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251, known as the Federal Reserve Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 226 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is based on the tenth par. of section 13 of act Dec. 23, 1913, as amended. The tenth par. constituted the eighth par. of section 13 in 1916 (39 Stat. 753), became the ninth par. in 1923 (42 Stat. 1478), and became the tenth par. in 1932 (47 Stat. 715). For further details, see Codification notes under sections 342 to 344 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed the name of the Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
### §411. Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation; redemption

Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §16 (par.), 38 Stat. 265; Jan. 30, 1934, ch. 6, §2(b)(1), 48 Stat. 337; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Phrase "hereinafter set forth" is from section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act, act Dec. 23, 1913. Reference probably means as set forth in sections 17 et seq. of the Federal Reserve Act. For classification of these sections to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of first par. of section 16 of act Dec. 23, 1913. Pars. 2 to 5, 6 (formerly 7), 7 to 10 (formerly 8 to 11, respectively), 12 (formerly 13), 13 (formerly 14), and 14 to 16 (formerly 15, 16, and 18, respectively) of section 16 of act Dec. 23, 1913, are classified to sections 412 to 415, 416, 418 to 421, 360, 248–1, and 467, respectively, of this title.

Former pars. 6 and 17 of section 16 of act Dec. 23, 1913, formerly classified to sections 415 and 467, respectively, of this title, were repealed by Pub. L. 90–269, §§5, 7, Mar. 18, 1968, 82 Stat. 50.

Par. 11 (formerly 12) of section 16 of act Dec. 23, 1913, formerly classified to section 422 of this title, was superseded by act June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §1(a), (b)(3), 48 Stat. 1225.

#### Amendments

1934—Act Jan. 30, 1934, struck out from last sentence provision permitting redemption in gold.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
**Exhibit
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms
      Corporation (the “ ***Company*** ”),
      for
      the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ ***Report*** ”),
      I,
      Christoph Trina, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










*/s/* Christoph
      Trina


Christoph
      Trina


Chief
      Financial Officer





Dated:
      November 19, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         448,377
<SECURITIES>                                 5,963,464
<RECEIVABLES>                                  621,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                     47,221
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,257,797
<PP&E>                                       2,350,885
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,352,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,296,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          842,710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,066
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,205,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,296,011
<SALES>                                      1,218,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,218,171
<CGS>                                          303,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,125,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,767,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,773,820)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,773,820)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.00)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Pro-forma net loss per share
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0937. JOSHUA WRIGHT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN

SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES et al.

Joshua Wright filed a complaint alleging that he had been unlawfully charged

for child support. The trial court dismissed the complaint, and Wright appealed

directly to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case here. Because this case 

involves child support, it is a domestic relations matter within the meaning of OCGA

§ 5-6-35 (a) (2). See Collins v. Davis, 318 Ga. App. 265, 266 (1) (733 SE2d 798)

(2012); Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 317 Ga. App. 426 (731 SE2d 110)

(2012). Appeals in such matters must be taken by application for discretionary

appeal. See Booker, supra. Wright’s failure to follow the appropriate appellate

procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider his appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/28/2015

January 28, 2015
EX-4.1 SPECIMEN CERTIFIATE, SERIES 2008ND-V






Exhibit 4.1








	ORGANIZED UNDER THE CAWS OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA




	THE SOUTH FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
10% MANDATORY CONVERTIBLE NON CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES 2008ND-V




	THIS CERTIFIES THAT Specimen
is the owner of *** One Hundred*** Shares




	Transferable only one the looks of the corporation by the holder hereof in persons or by money upon surrender
up this certificate properly endorsed




	IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the said corporation has caused this certificate to be sign by ed duly authorized officers
and its corporate to be on to affect this 8th day of May A D 2008





 









 









	THE SHARES EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED
(THE “SECURITIES ACT”) OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION. THE SHARES MAY NOT BE OFFERED,
SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT (1) PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR
(2) AN EXEMPTION FROM EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, IN EACH CASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE
STATE SECURITIES LAWS AND THE SECURITIES LAWS OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS, AND IN THE CASE OF A TRANSACTION EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION,
UNLESS THE COMPANY HAS RECEIVED AN OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO IT THAT SUCH TRANSACTION DOES NOT REQUIRE REGISTRATION
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND SUCH OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS.




	CERTIFICATE
FOR
100
SHARES
THE SOUTH FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
Mandatory Convertible
non-cumulative Preferred Stock
Series 2008 ND-v




	ISSUED TO SAMPLE
DATE
MAY 8, 2008




	fore value received here by sell assign and transfer and —shares represented by the within certificate
and do here by irrevocably constitute and appoint to transfer the said sheres on the books of the within
name corporation with fullpower of substitution in the premises dated —in presence of




	NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THE ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
CERTIFICAT IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
### §1715z–10. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–289, div. B, title I, §2120(a)(7), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2835

Section, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title II, §245, as added Pub. L. 93–383, title III, §308, Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 680; amended Pub. L. 94–375, §7, Aug. 3, 1976, 90 Stat. 1071; Pub. L. 95–128, title III, §§301(g), 310, Oct. 12, 1977, 91 Stat. 1131, 1136; Pub. L. 95–406, §1(g), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 879; Pub. L. 95–557, title III, §301(g), Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2096; Pub. L. 95–630, title XV, §1503, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3713; Pub. L. 96–71, §1(g), Sept. 28, 1979, 93 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 96–105, §1(g), Nov. 8, 1979, 93 Stat. 794; Pub. L. 96–153, title III, §§301(g), 311(b), Dec. 21, 1979, 93 Stat. 1112, 1115; Pub. L. 96–372, §1(g), Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1363; Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §301(g), Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1638; Pub. L. 97–35, title III, §331(g) Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 413; Pub. L. 97–289, §1(g), Oct. 6, 1982, 96 Stat. 1230; Pub. L. 98–35, §1(g), May 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 197; Pub. L. 98–109, §1(g), Oct. 1, 1983, 97 Stat. 745; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §§401(f), 441, 442], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1208, 1223, 1224; Pub. L. 99–120, §1(f), Oct. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 99–156, §1(f), Nov. 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 815; Pub. L. 99–219, §1(f), Dec. 26, 1985, 99 Stat. 1730; Pub. L. 99–267, §1(f), Mar. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 73; Pub. L. 99–272, title III, §3007(f), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 105; Pub. L. 99–289, §1(b), May 2, 1986, 100 Stat. 412; Pub. L. 99–345, §1, June 24, 1986, 100 Stat. 673; Pub. L. 99–430, Sept. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 986; Pub. L. 100–122, §1, Sept. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 793; Pub. L. 100–154, Nov. 5, 1987, 101 Stat. 890; Pub. L. 100–170, Nov. 17, 1987, 101 Stat. 914; Pub. L. 100–179, Dec. 3, 1987, 101 Stat. 1018; Pub. L. 100–200, Dec. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 1327; Pub. L. 100–242, title IV, §§401(a)(4), 408(b), 415(b)(1), Feb. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1898, 1903, 1907; Pub. L. 107–326, §3, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2793, related to graduated payment and indexed mortgages.
### §3344. Time for proposal and adoption of rules

As appropriate, rules issued under sections 3342 and 3343 of this title shall be proposed not later than 6 months and shall be effective upon adoption in final form not later than 12 months after August 9, 1989.

(Pub. L. 101–73, title XI, §1115, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 515.)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Secretary of Defense Ash Carter Announces Policy for Transgender Service Members

By Department of Defense Press Operations 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Remarks on Ending the Ban on Transgender Service in the U.S. Military

More Articles/News
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Reports to Congress 
                      -  Congressional Testimony 
                      -  Speeches 

# Report to Congress on the Study of Diluted Bitumen - August 2014

Report to Congress on the Study of Diluted Bitumen - August 2014.pdf (4.77 MB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact           PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
### §2202b. Effect of restructuring on borrower stock

#### (a) Farm Credit Bank

If a Farm Credit Bank forgives and writes off, under section 2202a of this title, any of the principal outstanding on a loan made to any borrower, the Federal land bank association of which the borrower is a member and stockholder shall cancel the same dollar amount of borrower stock held by the borrower in respect of the loan, up to the total amount of such stock, and, to the extent provided for in the bylaws of the bank relating to its capitalization, the bank shall retire an equal amount of stock owned by the Federal land bank association.

#### (b) Production credit association

If a production credit association forgives and writes off, under section 2202a of this title, any of the principal outstanding on a loan made to any borrower, the association shall cancel the same dollar amount of borrower stock held by the borrower in respect of the loan, up to the total amount of such stock.

#### (c) Retention of stock

Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b), the borrower shall be entitled to retain at least one share of stock to maintain the borrower's membership and voting interest in the association.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.14B, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title I, §102(a), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1577; amended Pub. L. 100–399, title I, §102(g), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 990.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–399 substituted in subsec. heading "Farm Credit Bank" for "Federal land bank" and in text "a Farm Credit Bank" for "a Federal land bank" and ", to the extent provided for in the bylaws of the bank relating to capitalization, the bank shall" for "the Federal land bank shall".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–399 effective immediately after amendment made by section 401 of Pub. L. 100–233, which was effective 6 months after Jan. 6, 1988, see section 1001(b) of Pub. L. 100–399, set out as a note under section 2002 of this title.
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.

App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except

under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally

disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited

under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 30 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL THOMPSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-2156

(D.C. No. CIV-96-1703-LH)

(District of New Mexico)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, BALDOCK and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Michael Thompson, appearing pro se, seeks leave to appeal an

order of the District Court for the District of New Mexico denying with prejudice

his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255. We deny appellant a certificate of appealability because he has failed to

make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(1), and dismiss the appeal. 
- 2 -

Thompson pled guilty on March 18, 1994 to possession with intent to

distribute of 42.4 milligrams of LSD in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

841(b)(1)(C). The district court calculated an offense level of 20 and criminal

history category of VI, after applying downward departures for acceptance of

responsibility and mitigating circumstances and an enhancement for being a

career offender. Appellant was sentenced to seventy-two months from an

applicable guideline range of seventy to eighty-seven months. He now challenges

his sentence on only one ground -- that his original offense level without any

adjustments was miscalculated at level 12 instead of level 10.

The Drug Quantity Table in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) sets forth the respective

base offense levels for possession of various amounts of drugs. Subsection (14)

establishes an offense level of 12 for possession of “Less than 50 MG of LSD.” 

The district court correctly calculated the base offense level in sentencing

appellant for possession of less than one gram of LSD.

Appellant’s request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the

appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
#### § 111.54 Bankruptcy claims.

When the Commission learns that a bankruptcy petition has been filed by a debtor, before proceeding with further collection action, the Commission will take any necessary action in accordance with the provision of 31 CFR 901.2(h).
# C_2007056EN.01000701.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)) — Finanzamt Dinslaken v Gerold Meindl

(Case C-329/05) (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment - Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) - Self-employed person - Income tax - Spouses who live apart on a non-permanent basis - Refusal of joint assessment - Spouses residing separately - Wage compensation benefits for the non-resident spouse - Income not subject to tax in the spouse's Member State of residence)

(2007/C 56/11)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt Dinslaken

Applicant:

Defendant: Gerold Meindl

Defendant:

Third party: Christine Meindl-Berger

Third party:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) — Interpretation of Article 43 of the EC Treaty — National provisions on income tax — Refusal to assess to tax jointly spouses on the ground that the income received by the wife in the Member State of her residence exceeds certain thresholds, where in that Member State that income is not subject to tax.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) precludes a resident taxpayer from being refused, by the Member State of his residence, joint assessment to income tax with his spouse from whom he is not separated and who lives in another Member State, on the ground that that spouse received in that Member State both more than 10 % of the household's income and more than DEM 24 000, where the income received by that spouse in the second Member State is not there subject to income tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 29.10.2005.

1

---