alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006257EN.01000101.xml

| 25.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 October 2006

(2006/C 257/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2541 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4552 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67015 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2002 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5918 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 85,69 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3855 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5767 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,395 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 262,92 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8771 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5370 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,60 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 36,594 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8462 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6570 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4180 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7594 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8933 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9761 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 202,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7225 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9105 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3893 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 493,83 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6107 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,774 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,7690 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,676 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2541

JPY

Japanese yen

149,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4552

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67015

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2002

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5918

ISK

Iceland króna

85,69

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3855

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5767

CZK

Czech koruna

28,395

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

262,92

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8771

RON

Romanian leu

3,5370

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,60

SKK

Slovak koruna

36,594

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8462

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6570

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4180

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7594

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8933

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9761

KRW

South Korean won

1 202,05

ZAR

South African rand

9,7225

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9105

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3893

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 493,83

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6107

PHP

Philippine peso

62,774

RUB

Russian rouble

33,7690

THB

Thai baht

46,676

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the Company), for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Weldon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Steven Weldon      
|Steven Weldon          
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|Dated: February 8, 2007



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2006244EN.01002601.xml

| 11.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/26

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4325 — BC Partners/Buziol/Fashion Box Group)

(2006/C 244/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4325. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4325. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Steven Madden, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jamieson A. Karson, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The information contained
  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                       | 
|-------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Jamieson A. Karson                 | 
|                                       | 
|Jamieson A. Karson                     | 
|Chairman and Chief
  Executive Officer | 
|March 12, 2008                         | 

---
ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE







Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2012, by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee,
Certificiate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2012-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant
to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



|1. |  | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.













Daniel
Bober

Executive
Vice President

Wells
Fargo Bank















|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | 
|---------------------- |  |
Exhibit 32.2

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  KeySpan   Corporation   (the
"Corporation")  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gerald
Luterman,   Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial   Officer  of  the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                         /s/ Gerald Luterman
                                         -------------------
                                         Name: Gerald Luterman
                                         Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                         Date: November 5, 2003
## This document contains CBI and is not available online or from the USEPA

Docket Center.

Please contact the Document Control O fficer listed in the Federal Register.
Order entered January 13, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00650-CV

SARAH BUCKLEW, Appellant

V.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR CIT FOR CIT HOME 

EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2003-1, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01018-C

ORDER

By letter dated November 27, 2019 the Court directed appellant to file an amended brief 

in compliance with rule 38 of the Texas Rules of Procedure within ten days. To date, appellant 

has failed to file an amended brief. Therefore, we ORDER the appeal submitted on appellant’s 

November 7, 2019 brief. Appellee’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
**Ar ea Source**  **Total Total**  **Capacity Capacity**  **Unit Size Capacity**  **Unit Size Capacity**  **Percent Percent**  **Distillate Oil Residual Oil**  **(MMBtu/hr) (MMBtu/hr)** **(MMBtu/hr) (MMBtu/hr)**  **in Range in Range**  **Coal #2**  **#4 or #6 Natural Gas**  **LPG Wood/Kerosene**  **NOx A ll Fuels Industrial** 

>250 616,209 >250 616,209 39.33 0

100 to 250 327,327 100 to 250 327,327 20.89 0

50 to 100 243,128 50 to 100 243,128 15.52 39.01 50 50 50 50 50 10 10 to 50 277,810 25 to 50 138,905 8.87 22.29 50 50 50 50 50 10 <10 102,306 10 to 25 138,905 8.87 22.29 10 10 10 10 10 10 <10 102,306 6.53 16.42 10 10 10 10 10 10

1,566,780 1,566,780 100.00 100.00 Weighted Average % Reduction 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 10.0 **NOx A ll Fuels Commercial/Institutional** 

>250 33,639 >250 33,639 2.93 0

100 to 250 140,110 100 to 250 140,110 12.21 0 50 to 100 208,980 50 to 100 208,980 18.21 21.46 50 50 50 50 50 10 10 to 50 463,685 25 to 50 231,843 20.20 23.81 50 50 50 50 50 10 <10 301,202 10 to 25 231,843 20.20 23.81 10 10 10 10 10 10 <10 301,202 26.25 30.93 10 10 10 10 10 10

1,147,616 1,147,616 100.00 100.00 Weighted Average % Reduction 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 10.0

% Reduction

SCC SCC_L4 SCC_L3 SCC_L2 34.52102001000 Total: All Boiler Types Anthracite Coal Industrial 34.52102002000 Total: All Boiler Types Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

Industrial 34.52102004000 Total: Boilers and IC Engines Distillate Oil Industrial 34.52102005000 Total: All Boiler Types Residual Oil Industrial 34.52102006000 Total: Boilers and IC Engines Natural Gas Industrial 34.52102007000 Total: All Boiler Types Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

Industrial 10.02102008000 Total: All Boiler Types Wood Industrial 10.02102011000 Total: All Boiler Types Kerosene Industrial 28.1 2103001000 Total: All Boiler Types Anthracite Coal Commercial/Institutional 28.1 2103002000 Total: All Boiler Types Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

Commercial/Institutional 28.1 2103004000 Total: Boilers and IC Engines Distillate Oil Commercial/Institutional 28.1 2103004001 Distillate Oil Commercial/Institutional 28.1 2103004002 Distillate Oil Commercial/Institutional 28.1 2103005000 Total: All Boiler Types Residual Oil Commercial/Institutional 28.1 2103006000 Total: Boilers and IC Engines Natural Gas Commercial/Institutional 28.1 2103007000 Total: All Combustor Types Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

Commercial/Institutional 10.02103008000 Total: All Boiler Types Wood Commercial/Institutional 10.02103011000 Total: All Combustor Types Kerosene Commercial/Institutional Assume all >250 Accounted for in Point Inventory Boiler capacity by size: Table ES-1,Characteriz ation of the U.S. Industrial/Commercial Boiler Population, May 2005. Oak Ridge

National Laboratory Area Sources are not subject to NOx regulation in all OTR states except for New Jersey. Thus, we are using the % reduction numbers from uncontrolled for area

sources. **From OTC Resolution 06-02 Control Strategy Proposal**

**NOx Percent Reduction**

Assume all > 250 Accounted for in Point Inventory
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Reports to Congress 
                      -  Congressional Testimony 
                      -  Speeches 

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Report to Congress - Hazardous Materials Grant Program for Fiscal Years 2016 - 2021

Report to Congress - PHMSA Planning and Training Grants Program for FY2016-2021.pdf (1.38 MB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
```

  EX-34.4
(logo) plante
       moran

Plante & Moran, PLLC
Suite 2700
225 W. Washington St.
Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.899.4460
Fax: 312.726.3262
plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that National Tax Search, LLC
(the "Company") complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the
National Tax Search TaxQ system (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012. The Company has determined that only certain servicing
criteria, 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),
1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are
applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform
covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable
to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this
report.

Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a
selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the
Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company
processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance
activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not
include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that
may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2012 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.

/s/Plante & Moran, PLLC

Chicago, IL
February 8, 2013

Praxity
MEMBER
GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF
INDEPENDENT FIRMS
```
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.110 When must a State court dismiss an action? Subject to 25 U.S.C. 1919 (Agreements between States and Indian Tribes) and § 23.113 (emergency proceedings), the following limitations on a State court's jurisdiction apply: ( a ) The court in any voluntary or involuntary child-custody proceeding involving an Indian child must determine the residence and domicile of the Indian child. If either the residence or domicile is on a reservation where the Tribe exercises exclusive jurisdiction over child-custody proceedings, the State court must expeditiously notify the Tribal court of the pending dismissal based on the Tribe's exclusive jurisdiction, dismiss the State-court child-custody proceeding, and ensure that the Tribal court is sent all information regarding the Indian child-custody proceeding, including, but not limited to, the pleadings and any court record.
( b ) If the child is a ward of a Tribal court, the State court must expeditiously notify the Tribal court of the pending dismissal, dismiss the State-court child-custody proceeding, and ensure that the Tribal court is sent all information regarding the Indian child-custody proceeding, including, but not limited to, the pleadings and any court record.
# C_2007056EN.01000201.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, United Kingdom) — Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks

(Case C-321/03) (1)

1

(Trade marks - Approximation of laws - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 2 - Concept of a sign of which a trade mark may consist - Transparent bin or collection chamber forming part of the external surface of a vacuum cleaner)

(2007/C 56/02)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dyson Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Registrar of Trade Marks

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division — Interpretation of Article 3(3) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1) — Mark consisting of a functional characteristic (transparent plastic container) forming part of the external surface of a vacuum cleaner

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2 of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks is to be interpreted as meaning that the subject-matter of an application for trade mark registration, such as that lodged in the main proceedings, which relates to all the conceivable shapes of a transparent bin or collection chamber forming part of the external surface of a vacuum cleaner, is not a ‘sign’ within the meaning of that provision and therefore is not capable of constituting a trade mark within the meaning thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 239, 4.10.2003.

1

---