alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 13.33 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing will be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written Statement or deposition. Any such written Statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner that allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written Statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts will be exchanged as provided in § 13.22(a).
( c ) The ALJ will exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: ( 1 ) Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth;
( 2 ) Avoid needless consumption of time; and
( 3 ) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ will permit the parties to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) At the discretion of the ALJ, a witness may be cross-examined on matters relevant to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. To the extent permitted by the ALJ, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination will be conducted in the manner of direct examination and may proceed by leading questions only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.
( f ) Upon motion of any party, the ALJ will order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of: ( 1 ) A party who is an Individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an Individual, an officer or employee of the party; ( i ) Appearing for the entity pro se; or
( ii ) Designated by the party's Representative; or
( 3 ) An Individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an Individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the Representative for the Government.
# C_2007083EN.01002001.xml

| 17.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/20

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 April 2007

(2007/C 83/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3550 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4545 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68055 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2240 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6431 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0925 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5812 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,963 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,16 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7031 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8180 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3320 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,360 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8395 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6249 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5352 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5866 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8310 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0507 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 260,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6497 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4784 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3982 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 320,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6626 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,532 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,9420 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,218 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3550

JPY

Japanese yen

161,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4545

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68055

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2240

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6431

ISK

Iceland króna

88,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0925

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5812

CZK

Czech koruna

27,963

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,16

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7031

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8180

RON

Romanian leu

3,3320

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,360

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8395

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6249

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5352

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5866

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8310

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0507

KRW

South Korean won

1 260,90

ZAR

South African rand

9,6497

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4784

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3982

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 320,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6626

PHP

Philippine peso

64,532

RUB

Russian rouble

34,9420

THB

Thai baht

44,218

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





The
      undersigned, Deborah A. Jordan, is the Executive Vice President and Treasurer
      of
      Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”).





This
      statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
      the
      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
      (the “Report”).





By
      execution of this statement, I certify that:





A)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
                78o(d)); and





B)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                Report.





This
      statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
      this
      statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
      this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








March
                10, 2006
            
            /s/
                Deborah A. JordanDated
            
            Deborah
                A. JordanExecutive
                Vice President and Treasurer
§ 700.163 Expenses in searching for replacement location—nonresidential moves. A displaced business, farm or nonprofit organization is entitled to an amount not to exceed $500 (five-hundred dollars), as determined by the Commission, for actual reasonable expenses incurred in searching for a replacement location, including— ( a ) Transportation computed at prevailing federal per diem and mileage allowance schedules; meals and lodging away from home;
( b ) Time spent searching, based on reasonable earnings;
( c ) Fees paid to a real estate agent or broker to locate a replacement site.
EXHIBIT 35.2

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated October 3, 2012, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated October 8, 2012, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2012-4US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Russell Piggott, am a Director of Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited (the Manager).
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Managers activities during the period from April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been
made under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Manager has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 17 June 2016



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|                                           
|/s/ Russell Piggott                        
|Russell Piggott
Director                   
|                                           
|Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited
#### Matteo Minnelli *v.*George H. Poulos et al.

*Wesley W. Horton,*in support of the motion.

Submitted February 13

decided March 5, 1974

The defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiff’s brief and appendix on the ground that they were not timely filed in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is denied.
### §§1439, 1439–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §§708, 712, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 418, 419

Section 1439, acts July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §19, 47 Stat. 737; May 28, 1935, ch. 150, §9, 49 Stat. 295; July 3, 1948, ch. 825, §2, 62 Stat. 1240, related to appointment, compensation, etc., of officers and employees of Board.

Section 1439–1, act July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §19A, as added Aug. 10, 1987, Pub. L. 100–86, title V, §505(d), 101 Stat. 633, related to apportionment of monies received by Board.
Order entered March 21, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00043-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JC-20-00975-X

ORDER

Before the Court is Father’s March 18, 2022 motion for a ten-day extension 

of time to file his appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief 

be filed no later than March 30, 2022.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
(logo) Prudential 

                                                                                                                                        Prudential Asset Resources

 

Prudential Mortgage Capital Company

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel 214 777-4500

 

A business of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Attn: Commercial Mtg Servicing

MAC D1086-120

550 South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte, NC 28202

 

 

 

RE:               RBS Commercial Funding Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C7

Period:   **January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period")**

 

 

 

Annual Compliance Statement

 

I, Hal Collett, in my capacity as President and Managing Director  of Prudential  Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")  dated as of June 1, 2012 pertaining to the above-referenced certificates, that:

 

(i)            a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the Reporting Period, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, and

 

 

(ii)            to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled  all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout  the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

 

Effective as of March 19, 2015

                                                                       

 

 

/s/ Hal Collett

Hal Collett

President and Managing Director

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
§ 17.300 Admission. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient to which §§ 17.300 through 17.310 apply, except as provided in §§ 17.225 and 17.230.
( b ) *Specific prohibitions.* ( 1 ) In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 17.300 through 17.310 apply shall not: ( i ) Give preference to one person over another on the basis of sex, by ranking applicants separately on such basis, or otherwise;
( ii ) Apply numerical limitations upon the number or proportion of persons of either sex who may be admitted; or
( iii ) Otherwise treat one individual differently from another on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for admission that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless the use of such test or criterion is shown to predict validly success in the education program or activity in question and alternative tests or criteria that do not have such a disproportionately adverse effect are shown to be unavailable.
( c ) *Prohibitions relating to marital or parental status.* In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 17.300 through 17.310 apply: ( 1 ) Shall not apply any rule concerning the actual or potential parental, family, or marital status of a student or applicant that treats persons differently on the basis of sex;
( 2 ) Shall not discriminate against or exclude any person on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, or establish or follow any rule or practice that so discriminates or excludes;
( 3 ) Subject to § 17.235(d), shall treat disabilities related to pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability or physical condition; and
( 4 ) Shall not make pre-admission inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for admission, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.” A recipient may make pre-admission inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for admission, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
### [§2349a. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(g)(3), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1955]

Section, added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XIII, §1317(i)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2902, required annual report from 1996 to 2000 regarding non-NATO cross-servicing and acquisition actions.
§ 111.34 If the respondent decides to pay the civil money penalty and not to challenge the reason to believe finding, what should the respondent do? ( a ) The respondent shall transmit payment in the amount of the civil money penalty to the Commission within forty (40) days of the Commission's reason to believe finding.
( b ) Upon receipt of the respondent's payment, the Commission shall send the respondent a final determination that the respondent has violated the statute or regulations and the amount of the civil money penalty and an acknowledgment of the respondent's payment.
# C_2007082EN.01003803.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/38

---

Action brought on 17 January 2007 — Torres v OHIM

(Case T-16/07)

(2007/C 82/86)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Torres (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, M. Baz de San Ceferino, A. Castán Pérez Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sociedad Cooperativa del Campo San Ginés

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | The annulment of the decision of 6 November 2006 of the 2nd Board of Appeal of OHIM issued in case R36/2006-2 with costs awarded against OHIM |
| --- | --- |

—

The annulment of the decision of 6 November 2006 of the 2nd Board of Appeal of OHIM issued in case R36/2006-2 with costs awarded against OHIM

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Sociedad Cooperativa del Campo San Ginés

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘TORRE DE BENITEZ ’for products in class 33 (application No. 2.438.018)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: International or national trade marks under the word mark ‘Torres ’for products in class 33, numerous other Community, international and national trade marks

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejection of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 40/94 (1) given that there is a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks at issue

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark.

1

---
### §249. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–412, title V, §501(c), Sept. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1258

Section, act Aug. 8, 1947, ch. 517, 61 Stat. 921, dealt with regulation of consumer credit.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–412 not to affect any action taken or proceeding pending at the time of repeal, see section 501(h) of Pub. L. 94–412, set out as a note under section 1601 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3423-3424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00766]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2013-0103]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Application for Long Term Loan or Guarantee (EIB 95-
10).

SUMMARY: Export-Import (Ex-Im) Bank is requesting an emergency approval 
for form EIB 95-10 Application for Long Term Loan or Guarantee, OMB 
3048-0013, because the Export Import Bank Reauthorization Act of 2012 
has placed additional reporting requirements on the Bank.
    By neutralizing the effect of export credit insurance and 
guarantees offered by foreign governments and by absorbing credit risks 
that the private section will not accept, Ex-Im Bank enables U.S. 
exporters to compete fairly in foreign markets on the basis of price 
and product. This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to 
12 USC Sec. 635 (a) (1), to determine eligibility of the applicant for 
Ex-Im Bank Assistance.
    The collection will provide information needed to determine 
compliance and creditworthiness for transaction requests submitted to 
Ex-Im Bank under its long-term guarantee and direct loan programs. The 
form is currently used to make a credit decision on approximately 85 
export transactions per year in divisions dealing with aircraft, 
structured finance, and trade finance.
    The application can be viewed at www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib95-10.pdf.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before March 18, 2013 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV or by mail to Michele Kuester, Export Import Bank 
of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 95-10 Application for Long Term Loan or 
Guarantee.

[[Page 3424]]

    OMB Number: 3048-0013.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information collected will provide information 
needed to determine compliance and creditworthiness for transaction 
requests submitted to the Export Import Bank under its long term 
guarantee and direct loan programs.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 84.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1.5 hours.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 2,100.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Yearly.
    Total Cost to the Government: $81,312.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-00766 Filed 1-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc.


In planning and performing our audit of the financial
statements of T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value
Fund, Inc. (hereafter referred to as the "Fund") for the
periods ended December 31, 2000, we
considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements
and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to
provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing
and maintaining internal control.  In
fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by
management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.
Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain
to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements
for external purposes that are fairly presented
in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding
of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors
or fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also,
projection of any evaluation of internal control to future
periods is subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that
the effectiveness of their design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that
might be material weaknesses under standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which
the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a
relatively low level the risk that misstatements
caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material
in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of
performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no
matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities,
that we consider to be material weaknesses as
defined above as of December 31, 2000.

This report is intended solely for the information and use
of management and the Board of Directors of
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc. and the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than
these specified parties.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
January 19, 2001