(logo)CohnReznick

ACCOUNTING  TAX  ADVISORY

 

CohnReznickLLP

cohnreznick.com

 

 

Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

Tothe PartnersCWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

 

We have examined management of CWCapitalAsset Management LLC (“CWCAM”)’s assertion that CWCAM complied with theservicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of theSecurities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the special servicingplatform (“Platform”) for commercial mortgage-backed securities transactionthat were issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which CWCAM acted as thespecial servicer included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion onCompliance with Regulation AB Criteria as of and for the year ended December31, 2018. CWCAM’s management is responsible for its assertion. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Management has determined that the criteriaset forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(B), (d)(3)(i)(C),(d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix),(d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv)are not applicable to the activities performed by CWCAM, as a special servicer,with respect to CWCAM's Platform. The commercial mortgage-backed securitiestransactions covered by this Platform are those specified in Appendix B in theaccompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria.

 

Our examination was conducted inaccordance with attestation standards established by the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that weplan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whethermanagement’s assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. Anexamination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence aboutmanagement’s assertion. The nature, timing, and extent of the proceduresselected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks ofmaterial misstatement of management’s assertion, whether due to fraud or error.We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate toprovide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on CWCAM’s compliance with the specified requirements.

 

Our examination disclosed the followingmaterial noncompliance with servicing criterion 1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) asapplicable to CWCAM:

 

With respect to servicing criterion1122(d)(2)(vii)(B), certain bank reconciliations were not prepared within 30calendar days after the bank statement cut-off date.

 

In our opinion, except for the materialnoncompliance described above, management’s assertion that CWCAM complied withthe servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 ofRegulation AB included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion on Compliancewith Regulation AB Criteria is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

We do not express an opinion or any formof assurance on Management’s Discussion on Material Instance of Noncompliancein Schedule B to the Management’s Assertion.

 

  

/s/ CohnReznick LLP

Bethesda,MarylandFebruary 28, 2019