alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

          - [2280-665]

Nominations for the following properties being considered for listing or related actions in the National Register were received by the National Park Service before January 22, 2011. Pursuant to §§ 60.13 or 60.15 of 36 CFR part 60, written comments are being accepted concerning the significance of the nominated properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation. Comments may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by March 17, 2011.

Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Paul Loether,

Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks Program.

## LOUISIANA

## Orleans Parish

Straight University Boarding House and Dining Hall, 1423 N Claiborne Ave, New Orleans, 11000074

## Ouachita Parish

                        Miller—Roy Building, 1001 Desiard St, Monroe, 11000075                              ( print page 11509)    

## Sabine Parish

Pleasant Hill Battlefield Historic District, Near junction of ST HWY 175 and 177, Pelican, 11000072

## SOUTH CAROLINA

## Beaufort County

Sams Tabby Complex (38BU581), (Historic Resources of St. Helena Island c. 1740-c. 1935 MPS) S end of Datha Island at Mink's Pt near Jenkins Cr, Frogmore, 11000073

[FR Doc. 2011-4671 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson Respiratory Care Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Charles A. French, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Charles FrenchCharles French Chief Executive Officer and
President May 7, 2004
Guaranty Side Letter



 Exhibit 10.4 
 ACCENTIA BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 
 324 South Hyde Park Ave., Suite 350 
 Tampa, Florida 33606 
 May 30, 2008 
 Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. 
 Valens
U.S. SPV I, LLC 
 Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd. 
 Valens Offshore
SPV II, Corp. 
 PSource Structured Debt Limited 
 c/o Laurus
Capital Management, LLC and 
 Valens Capital Management, LLC 
 355 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor 
 New York, New York 10017 
 Attention: Portfolio
Services 
 Re: Guaranty 
 Ladies and
Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made to that certain Guaranty dated March 31, 2006 (as amended, modified, supplemented and/or restated from
time to time, the “Guaranty”) from Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Company”) in favor of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”), Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC (as partial assignee of Laurus,
“Valens US”), Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd. (as partial assignee of Laurus, “Offshore I”), Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (as partial assignee of Laurus, “Offshore II”) and PSource Structured Debt
Limited (as partial assignee of Laurus, “PSource”; and together with Laurus, Valens US, Offshore I and Offshore II, individually, each a “Creditor Party” and collectively, the “Creditor Parties”).

 The Company hereby agrees that the phrase “sixty-four (64%) of all then presently due and outstanding debts and liabilities of
the Company, as adjusted from time to time, under the Secured Promissory Note” as set forth in the Guaranty, shall mean a fixed principal amount of $4,991,360 together with all other Obligations covered by and as defined under the Guaranty.

 This side letter shall be construed and enforced in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York. 
 [Remainder of the page intentionally blank.] 







 This letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts each of which taken together shall
constitute one and the same agreement. Any signature delivered by a party by facsimile transmission or other electronic transmission shall be deemed an original signature hereto. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	ACCENTIA BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Alan Pearce

	Name:	 	Alan M. Pearce
	Title:	 	CFO


  

			
	 Acknowledged and Agreed to
 as of this 30th
day of May, 2008:

	
	LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD.
		
	By:	 	Laurus Capital Management, LLC its investment manager
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Patrick Regan

	Name:	 	Patrick Regan
	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
	
	VALENS U.S. SPV I, LLC
		
	By:	 	Valens Capital Management, LLC its investment manager
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Patrick Regan

	Name:	 	Patrick Regan
	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
	
	VALENS OFFSHORE SPV I, LTD.
		
	By:	 	Valens Capital Management, LLC its investment manager
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Patrick Regan

	Name:	 	Patrick Regan
	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory









			
	VALENS OFFSHORE SPV II, LLC
		
	By:	 	Valens Capital Management, LLC its investment manager
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Patrick Regan

	Name:	 	Patrick Regan
	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
	
	PSOURCE STRUCTURED DEBT LIMITED
		
	By:	 	Laurus Capital Management, LLC its investment manager
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John Gilfillan

	Name:	 	John Gilfillan
	Title:	 	Director PSource Capital Ltd for and on Behalf of PSource Structured Debt Limited
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Actuate Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof, the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 7, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Peter I. Cittadini            
|Peter I. Cittadini                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Daniel A. Gaudreau                                    
|Daniel A. Gaudreau                                           
|Senior Vice President, Operations and Chief
Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Lawson A. Winslow *v.*A. F. Benedict.

*Exemption—of wages from garniishiment.*The wages of a party, to the extent of $25, are exempt from garnishment, under the statute of 1872, where he is the head of a family, and residing with the same in this State, even though he may intend to remove out of the State.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of the City of *Aurora;*the Hon. Bichard G. Montony, Judge, presiding.

Mr. M. O. Southworth, for the appellant.

Mr. Frank M. Annis, for the appellee.

Mr. Chief Justice Bkeese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

A writ of attachment was sued out of the office of a justice of the peace of Kane county, by Winslow, appellant, against one Daniel Kipp, claiming thirty-five dollars for medical services rendered by Winslow to Kipp. Judgment was rendered against Kipp for this amount. Simultaneously, process of garnishment was served on Benedict, alleged to be a debtor of Kipp, who appeared and acknowledged he was indebted to Kipp in the sum of twenty-five dollars and fifty cents, as wages for his work and services as a journeyman painter. Kipp claimed that twenty-five dollars of this amount was exempt from garnishment, by the act of 1872 in regard to gar*121nishment. The justice allowed this defense, and rendered judgment against Benedict, the garnishee, for fifty cents. On appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of the City of Aurora, by the plaintiff, it was then agreed, by the parties, that Kipp was the head of a family, and residing with it, at the time the writ of attachment and garnishee process was sued out, and the court gave judgment for fifty cents, the excess over and above the amount claimed to be exempt.

To reverse this judgment, the plaintiff appeals to this court. This case is too plain for argument. Section 14 of the act in regard to garnishment, Laws of 1872, p. 465, is as follows: “The wages and services of a defendant, being the head of a family, and residing with the same, to an amount not exceeding twenty-five dollars, shall be exempt from garnishment. In case the wages or services of such defendant, in the hands of a garnishee, shall exceed twenty-five dollars, judgment shall be given only for the balance above that amount.”

Though the defendant in the attachment may have intended to remove out of the State, still, whilst here, residing with his family, he was entitled to the benefit of this section of the statute. There are no limitations or qualifications in the statute and we can not add them.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 115.134 Specialized training: Investigations. ( a ) In addition to the training provided to employees, DHS agencies with responsibility for holding facilities shall provide specialized training on sexual abuse and effective cross-agency coordination to agency investigators who conduct investigations into allegations of sexual abuse at holding facilities. All investigations into alleged sexual abuse must be conducted by qualified investigators.
( b ) The agency must maintain written documentation verifying specialized training provided to agency investigators pursuant to this section.
#### HARWOOD v. JOHNSON

No. 37PA89

Case below: 326 N.C. 231

Petition by defendants to rehear denied 5 April 1990.
Employment Agreement between Chill Acquisitions, Inc. and Charles A. Carroll



 Exhibit 10.25 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”)
dated as of May 29, 2008, is made by and between Goodman Global, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Charles Carroll (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Executive entered into an employment agreement with Chill Acquisition, Inc., dated as of February 13, 2008 (the “Employment
Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Company, Chill Holdings Inc., and Chill Acquisition, Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of October 21, 2007 (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which the Chill Acquisition, Inc. merged with and into the Company (the “Merger”) on February 13, 2008, and whereby Chill Acquisition, Inc.
ceased to exist and the Company became a subsidiary of Chill Holdings, Inc.; 
 WHEREAS, the Company assumed the rights and
obligations of Chill Acquisition, Inc. upon the closing of the Merger, including all such rights and obligations under the Employment Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein; and 
 WHEREAS,
Section 11(b) of the Employment Agreement permits such amendment by a written agreement by the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Company. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual agreements herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is amended as follows: 
 1. Defined Terms. Except for those terms defined above, the definition of capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings
ascribed to them under the Employment Agreement. 
 2. New Section 6(f). The Employment Agreement shall be hereby amended by
adding the following new Section 6(f): 
 “(f) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, and subject to Executive’s
continued compliance with Sections 7 and 8, and execution of the Release (in the manner described in Section 6(c)(iii) above), if Executive’s employment is terminated for any reason during the Employment Term (other than Executive’s
death or by the Company for Cause) or upon the expiration of the Employment Term, Executive and Executive’s lawful spouse shall be entitled to continue participating in the Company’s group health plans until Executive reaches age 65 or, if
later, Executive’s qualifying age under Medicare; provided that Executive will pay 100% of the premium that would have been 








 
payable if such continued coverage was provided under COBRA (less the 2% COBRA administrative surcharge).” 
 3. Ratification. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged and are hereby ratified by the Company and the Executive.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer and the Executive has
executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year first set forth above. 
  

			
	Goodman Global, Inc.
	
	/s/ Erik Ragatz
	By:	 	Erik Ragatz
	Its:	 	Director


  

			
	Executive
	
	/s/ Charles Carroll
	By:	 	Charles Carroll


  

 2
### §8867. Transfer of prize property to another district for sale

(a) In the case of any prize property ordered to be sold, if the court believes that it will be in the interest of all parties to have the property sold in a judicial district other than the one in which the proceedings are pending, the court may direct the marshal to transfer the property to the district selected by the court for the sale, and to insure it. In such a case the court shall give the marshal proper orders as to the time and manner of conducting the sale.

(b) When so ordered the marshal shall transfer the property and keep it safely. He is responsible for its sale in the same manner as if the property were in his own district and for the deposit of the gross proceeds with the Treasurer of the United States or public depositary nearest to the place of sale, subject to the order of the court for the district where the adjudication is pending.

(c) The necessary expenses of insuring, transferring, receiving, keeping, and selling the property are a charge upon it and upon the proceeds. Whenever any such expense is paid in advance by the marshal, any amount not repaid to him from the proceeds shall be allowed to him as in the case of expenses incurred in suits in which the United States is a party.

(d) If the Secretary of the Navy believes that it will be in the interest of all parties to have the property sold in a judicial district other than the one in which the proceedings are pending, he may, either by a general regulation or by a special direction in the cause, require the marshal to transfer the property from the district in which the judicial proceedings are pending to any other district for sale. In such a case proceedings shall be had as if the transfer had been made by order of the court.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 479, §7667; renumbered §8867, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7667 | 34 U.S.C. 1145. | R.S. 4629. |

34 U.S.C. 1145 and this section reflect the Act of May 29, 1920, ch. 214, §1, 41 Stat. 654, which requires substitution of "Treasurer of the United States or public depositary" for "assistant treasurer".

In subsection (b) the words "He is responsible for its sale" are substituted for the words "It shall be the duty of the marshal to * * * sell the same", because, as shown in §7666 of this title, the marshal does not sell the property himself but supervises the auctioneer who conducts the sale.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7667 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### Connecticut Savings and Loan Association *v.*Wilbert Mitchell et al.

*Jeffrey M. Mines,*in support of the motion.

Submitted January 17

decided February *5,*1974

The plaintiff’s motion to expedite the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q/A
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      83,341,000
<SECURITIES>                                16,566,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,646,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   392,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           103,981,000
<PP&E>                                       7,253,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,466,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,212,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,191,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 103,290,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               111,212,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,833,000
<CGS>                                        6,070,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,430,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,324,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,343,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,343,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.36)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 17.605 Enforcement procedures.

The investigative, compliance, and enforcement procedural provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) (“Title VI”) are hereby adopted and applied to these Title IX regulations. These procedures may be found at 6 CFR part 21.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

AccountabilityBeginning Teacher InductionEducational ImprovementEducational QualityElementary Secondary EducationExcellence in EducationFaculty DevelopmentHigher EducationPreservice Teacher EducationStandardsTeacher CompetenciesTeacher EvaluationTeacher RecruitmentTeachersTeaching Skills

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
TRAVEL MANAGEMENT

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft Resource Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
March 2007

TRAVEL ROUTE INVENTORY
Township Plat Index Map

a BLM National Monument

Townships Covered by Travel Route
Inventory Plats for the Monument

Travel Route

Main Public Access Routes to Monument

Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 12, Units Meters
Clark 1866 Spheriod

NAD27 Datum
N
2 0 2 4 6 Miles
EE ——

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
for the use of this map for purposes not intended by the BLM, or
to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information
shown. Spatial information may not meet National map Accuracy
Standards. This information may be updated without notification.

United States Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Management

Tucson Field Office

Arizona

S