**Exhibit 34.1**

**ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH**

**SERVICING CRITERIAFOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES**

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Member of 

CenterPoint Energy HoustonElectric, LLC 

Houston, Texas 

Wehave examined management’s assertion, included as Exhibit 33.1 and titled Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities, that CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC (the “Company”) compliedwith the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB applicable for the approximately $1,695 million original principal amount of CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV,LLC’s transition bonds (the “2012 Senior Secured Transition Bonds”) as of December 31, 2012 and for the period January 19, 2012 (issuance date of the 2012 Senior Secured Transition Bonds) through December 31, 2012,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), (2)(ii) (wire transfer disbursements), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (3)(ii) (allocation and remittance),(3)(iii) (disbursements to investors), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors),(4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the 2012Senior Secured Transition Bonds. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestationstandards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the 2012 Senior Secured Transition Bonds, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors thatmay have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis forour opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2012 and for the period January 19, 2012 throughDecember 31, 2012 for the approximately $1,695 million original principal amount of CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC’s transition bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

March 28, 2013 

Houston, Texas