alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.3 I, Derek Chang, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Renaissance Media Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana)
LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and Renaissance Media
Capital Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrants,
including their consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Reserved];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 12, 2004/s/ Derek ChangDerek ChangInterim Co-Chief Financial Officer(Co-Principal Financial Officer)
### **CHAPTER 38—MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE**

Sec.
3701.
Findings and purpose.
3702.
Definitions.
3703.
Applicability.
3704.
Foreclosure commissioner; designation, duties, etc.
3705.
Prerequisites to foreclosure.
3706.
Notice of default and foreclosure sale; condition and term of sale.
3707.
Commencement of foreclosure; powers and duties of foreclosure commissioner or substitute.
3708.
Service of notice of default and foreclosure sale.
3709.
Presale reinstatement.
3710.
Foreclosure sale.
3711.
Foreclosure costs.
3712.
Disposition of sale proceeds.
3713.
Transfer of title and possession.
3714.
Record of foreclosure and sale.
3715.
Computation of time.
3716.
Separability.
3717.
Regulations.
# C_2007010EN.01000401.xml

| 16.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/4

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.4439 — Ryanair/AER Lingus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 10/06)

On 20 December 2006, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 — 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4439 — Ryanair/AER Lingus, to the following address:

| Commission of the European Communities |
| --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70 |
| B-1000 Brussels |

Commission of the European Communities

Competition DG

Merger Registry

Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70

B-1000 Brussels

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Earnings, and
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts as of and for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 1999 shown elsewhere in this report and is qualified in it's
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         125,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,114,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                   476,619
<INVENTORY>                                  6,859,686
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,197,586
<PP&E>                                       3,441,897
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,644,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,361,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,734,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,002
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,145,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,361,776
<SALES>                                     33,823,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,823,947
<CGS>                                       24,476,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,531,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               240,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             773,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,497,657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,497,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,497,657)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.79)


</TABLE>
§ 9.23 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 9.1(a), does not apply in the case of any reasonable payment to a person, other than an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action, if the payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) The reporting requirements in § 9.3(a) and (b) regarding filing a disclosure form by each person, if required, shall not apply with respect to professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, *professional and technical services* shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting of a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( d ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal action include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( e ) Persons other than officers or employees of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action include consultants and trade associations.
( f ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
L. Jones, Jr., Chairman/CEO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on
         the Company.



/s/ ROBERT L. JONES
--------------------------------------------
Robert L. Jones, Chairman/CEO
### §904a. Art. 104a. Fraudulent enlistment, appointment, or separation

Any person who—

(1) procures his own enlistment or appointment in the armed forces by knowingly false representation or deliberate concealment as to his qualifications for that enlistment or appointment and receives pay or allowances thereunder; or

(2) procures his own separation from the armed forces by knowingly false representation or deliberate concealment as to his eligibility for that separation;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 66, §883; renumbered §904a, Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5401(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2938.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 883 | 50:677. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 83), 64 Stat. 134. |

In clauses (1) and (2), the words "means of" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 renumbered section 883 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
1 **MEMORANDUM** DATE: April 5 , 2012 SUBJECT: NSPS Low Pressure Well Threshold : Summary and Impacts Estimates In response to comments received on the proposed rule related to the technical infeasibility of gas capture from low pressure wells, the EPA evaluated alternative options and developed a pressure threshold in the final rule. This threshold is based on a simple equation operators can use to determine if the flowback pressure of a well is sufficient to overcome the pressure of the flow line , thus making gas capture through Reduced Emission Completions possible . If the flowback gas of a well falls below the pressure threshold, combustion is allowed as an alternative. Full details of the analysis to deve lop the pressure threshold and nation-wide impacts are available in the Determination of Minimum Flowback Pressure Memorandum. This document provides additional details on the impacts related to CBM wells 

### Further Details on the **Low Pressure Threshold Impacts Analysis:**  The data used in this analysis is 2008 data from HPDI, which contains detailed production and other related data on natural gas well s in the United States . Using this data set and other information to estimate the required equation input parameters, EPA applied the equati on to each hydraulically fractured gas well completion in the data set to determine which completion would likely fall above or below the threshold. Based on this analysis, the key results are as follows :  10% of hydraulically fractured wells nation-wide would fall below the pressure threshold in the rule and thus allowed to combust as an alternative to REC.  CBM represents about 85% of the total wells that are estimated to fall below the threshold ; EPA’s estimates show that the maj ority of CBM well completions in the dataset ( almost 90%) would fall below the threshold . CBM wells have been recognized by many commenters as having low VOC and should not be included in the rule. This analysis shows that even in the absence of a VOC threshold, the majority of these wells are likely not subject to the REC requirements. **Background: Overview of Final Rule Pressure Threshold**  **Equation:** The final NSPS OOOO rule includes Equation 1 (below) for operators to determine if a well meets the threshold. Operators will input the reservoir pressure and vertical well depth (both of which are available at the time the well is perforated) for each gas well that is a hydraulic fracturing affected facility into Equation 1 . This result of this equation will determine a calculated pressure of the gas immediately before it would be routed to the flow line , resulting in one of two cases : ( 1 ) the calculated l ine pressure is greater than the actual line pressure to be used by the operator, thus the gas capture using REC in combinati on with combustion is required, or (2 ) t he calculated line pressure is less than or equal to the actual flow line pressure, combustion is allowed as an alternative.

= 0 . 445 × − 0 . 038 × + 67 . 578 **(Eq. 1)**
### §359a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §14(h), as added June 8, 1979, Pub. L. 96–18, §2, 93 Stat. 35, which authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to borrow and sell in open market, and required the repurchase and return of obligations to Federal Reserve Banks, was effective only during the two-year period that began June 8, 1979, as provided by section 3(a) of Pub. L. 96–18.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1116 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1116

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude income from the 
    transportation of oil and gas by pipeline from subpart F income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 1999

  Mr. Nickles introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude income from the 
    transportation of oil and gas by pipeline from subpart F income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION 
              INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 954(g)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (defining foreign base company oil related income) is amended by 
striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the period 
at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ``, or'', and by inserting 
after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) the pipeline transportation of oil or gas 
                within such foreign country.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years of controlled foreign corporations beginning after 
December 31, 1999, and taxable years of United States shareholders with 
or within which such taxable years of controlled foreign corporations 
end.
                                 <all>
```
§ 158.633 Recognition time-off. ( a ) Under this section and § 158.630, and for the reasons and bases stated in § 158.630(a), the Department may provide recognition time-off to a DHS-CS employee for use within a designated timeframe not to exceed 26 work periods, as defined in § 158.705(c). Recognition time-off is time-off from duty without charge to leave or loss of compensation.
( b ) Under this section and § 158.630, and for the reasons and bases stated in § 158.630(b) and as part of an offer of employment in the DHS-CS, the Department may offer up to 40 hours of recognition time-off to an individual selected for employment in the DHS-CS for use within a designated timeframe not to exceed 26 work periods, as defined in § 158.705(b). The Department may require a service agreement as part of providing, upon appointment, recognition time-off to an individual selected for employment in the DHS-CS.
( c ) All recognition time-off provided, and the use of such time-off, must be recorded in a timekeeping system for purposes of salary administration and leave administration under this part.
( d ) Recognition time-off provided under this section may not, under any circumstances, be converted to a cash payment to the receiving DHS-CS employee or any other type of time-off or leave.
( e ) Recognition time-off under this section is based on time-off awards provided under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 4502(e).
( f ) Recognition time-off under this section is in lieu of the time-off awards provided under 5 U.S.C. 4502(e), and a DHS-CS employee is ineligible to receive any such awards.
( g ) An individual selected for employment in the DHS-CS is ineligible to receive, as part of the offer of employment, any other offer of time-off or time-off award from the Department except as provided in this section and §§ 158.630 and 158.651. An individual appointed to an advisory appointment is also ineligible to receive, as part of an offer of employment in the DHS-CS, any offer of recognition under this section.
( h ) A recognition time-off provided under this section to a DHS-CS advisory appointee is subject to additional requirements and restrictions in subpart J of this part.
# C_2006331EN.01004302.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/43

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2006 — K-Swiss v OHIM (Parallel stripes on a shoe)

(Case T-14/06) (1)

1

(Community Trade Mark - Procedural issues - Plea of inadmissibility - Notification of the decision of the Board of Appeal - Time-limit for bringing an action)

(2006/C 331/96)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: K-Swiss, Inc. (West Lake Village, California, United States) (represented by: H. Hübner, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 September 2005 (Case R 1109/2004-1), concerning registration of a mark in the form of five parallel stripes placed on the lateral part of a representation of a shoe as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible.

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.

1

---
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO

. 09

- 1 3

- 00 518

- C V



### ____________________
PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION , Appellant

V.

JUDY MANSFIELD , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________ On A ppeal from the 128th District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No

. A

- 100613

- C

________________________________________________________ _____________ SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

On February 26, 2015 , we issued our original opinion in this case,
conditionally affirming the trial court’s judgment and sugge sting a remittitur of
$30,000.00 from the final j udgment issued by the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P.

46.3. We further provided that if the appellee, Judy Mansfield, filed a remittitur

within fifteen days from the date of our opinion, we would reform the trial court’ s judgment to reflect the award of $20,000 in future medical damages and affirm the
judgment as reform ed

.2 On February 26, 2015, the appell ee filed a remittitur with the Clerk of the

C ourt, stating that she desires to accept the suggested remittitur and asking that the
trial court’s judgment be affirmed as reform ed. We therefore issue this
supplemental opinion, an d in accordance with ou r original opinion and the
appellee’ s timely

- filed remitt itur, we reform the trial court’ s judgment by reducing
the amount of the damages thereby awarded by $30,000, as of the date the trial
court rendered its judgment. We reform the penultimate paragraph of the trial
court’s final judgment so that it states as follows:

It is, therefore, ORDERED, AD JU DGED and DECREED that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Judy Mansfield and against Pilgrim ’ s Pride Corporation in the amount of $50 2,321.87 (Five Hundred Two Thousand, Three Hundred Twenty

- One Dollars
, and Eighty

- Seven Cents) , which sum will bear post

- judgment interest at a rate of 5.00% per annum until paid, for which let execution issue.
Finally, given the appellee’s decision to accept the Court’s suggested
remittitur, the trial court’s judgment, as reformed, is affirmed. Our original opinion

remains otherwise in effect.

AFFIRMED AS REFORMED

.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice
Supplemental Opinion Delivered March 5 , 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.