alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102.3 Termination of registration (52 U.S.C. 30103(d)(1)). ( a ) ( 1 ) A political committee (other than a principal campaign committee) may terminate only upon filing a termination report on the appropriate FEC Form or upon filing a written statement containing the same information with the Commission. Except as provided in 11 CFR 102.4(c), only a committee which will no longer receive any contributions or make any disbursements that would otherwise qualify it as a political committee may terminate, provided that such committee has no outstanding debts and obligations. In addition to the Notice, the committee shall also provide a final report of receipts and disbursements, which report shall include a statement as to the purpose for which such residual funds will be used, including a statement as to whether such residual funds will be used to defray expenses incurred in connection with an individual's duties as a holder of federal office.
( 2 ) An authorized committee of a qualified Member, as defined at 11 CFR 113.1(f), shall comply with the requirements of 11 CFR 113.2 before any excess funds are converted to such Member's personal use. All other authorized committees shall include in their termination reports a statement signed by the treasurer, stating that no noncash committee assets will be converted to personal use.
( b ) Except as provided at 11 CFR 102.4, a principal campaign committee may not terminate until it has met the requirements of 11 CFR 102.3(a) and until all debts of any other authorized committee(s) of the candidate have been extinguished.
[45 FR 15104, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 45 FR 21209, Apr. 1, 1980; 56 FR 34126, July 25, 1991; 84 FR 18699, May 2, 2019]
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Eugene B.Johnson, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc.(the ”Company”);

2.                Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.                The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and we have:

(i)             designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report was being prepared;

(ii)         evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report; and

(iii)     disclosed in this report anychange in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of a quarterly report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                The Company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

(i)             all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(ii)         anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financialreporting.

**Date: August 7,2006**

|        | /s/ Eugene B. Johnson     |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Eugene B. Johnson         |   |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer* |   |

 

----
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-31T00:03:21-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7047

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANES SUBASIC, a/k/a Mladen Subasic,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-cr-00216-FL-3; 5:16-cv-00089-FL)

Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 20, 2018

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anes Subasic, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anes Subasic seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Subasic has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Subasic’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2006326EN.01002503.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/25

---

Appeal brought on 10 October 2006 by Bertelsmann AG, Sony Corporation of America against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2006 in Case T-464/04: Independent Music Publishers and Labels Association (Impala, international association) v Commission of the European Communities.

(Case C-413/06 P)

(2006/C 326/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Bertelsmann AG, Sony Corporation of America (represented by: P. Chappatte, J. Boyce, Solicitors, N. Levy, Barrister, R. Snelders, avocat, T. Graf, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities, Independent Music Publishers and Labels Association (Impala, association internationale), Sony BMG Music Entertainment BV

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 in Case T-464/04; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 in Case T-464/04;

| — | reject Impala's application for annulment of the Commission's decision or, alternatively, refer the case back for reconsideration to the Court of First Instance; and |
| --- | --- |

—

reject Impala's application for annulment of the Commission's decision or, alternatively, refer the case back for reconsideration to the Court of First Instance; and

| — | order Impala to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Impala to pay the costs of the present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellants make seven pleas on appeal:

First, that the Court of First Instance erred in law by using the Commission's statement of objections as a benchmark for its substantive assessment of the decision.

Second, that the Court of First Instance erred in law by requiring the Commission to conduct a new market investigation following the notifying parties' response to the statement of objections.

Third, that the Court of First Instance erred in law by applying an erroneous and excessively high standard of proof for merger clearance decisions.

Fourth, that the Court if First Instance exceeded the scope of judicial review by substituting its own assessment for that of the Commission and, in doing so, itself committed manifest errors and fundamentally misconstrued the evidence.

Fifth, that the Court of First Instance erred in law by misapplying the criteria developed in Airtours for the assessment of the feasibility of tacit collusion.

Airtours

Sixth, that the Court of First Instance erred in law by applying an erroneous and excessive standard of reasoning for merger clearance decisions.

Seventh, that the Court of First Instance erred in law by relying on evidence that was not disclosed to the applicants and that was not before the Commission at the time it adopted its decision.

---
**Exhibit31.2**

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a)or 15d-14(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I,Theodore S. Alpert, certify that:

(1)          I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the “registrant”);

(2)          Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

(3)          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)          The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved]

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

(5)          The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: November 14, 2006
|        | By:    | /s/ Ted S.  Alpert      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Theodore S. Alpert      |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 96

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a twothirds vote on any bill or joint resolution that either authorizes the

President to enter into a trade agreement that is implemented pursuant

to fast-track procedures or that implements a trade agreement pursuant

to such procedures.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1999

Mr. TRAFICANT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require a two-thirds vote on any bill or joint resolution

that either authorizes the President to enter into a trade

agreement that is implemented pursuant to fast-track

procedures or that implements a trade agreement pursuant to such procedures.

1 Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the

3 following new clause:

4 ‘‘6. No bill or joint resolution that—

5 ‘‘(1) authorizes the President to enter into a

6 trade agreement that is implemented by a bill or
2

•HRES 96 IH

1 joint resolution that is considered by each House of

2 Congress under procedures that preclude amend3 ments; or

4 ‘‘(2) implements any trade agreement and that

5 is not subject to amendment;

6 shall be considered as passed or agreed to unless so deter7 mined by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the Members

8 voting.’’.

Æ
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Blue Book

              																	Home Owners' Loan Corporation					 and 	Shade, C. S. 						*The Blue Book : A Brief Account of the Lending Operation of Home Owners' Loan Corporation with Special Reference to the Examination of Land Titles and the Conduct and Closing of Real Estate Loans*,										1936,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/435,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
S. 11

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

For the relief of Wei Jingsheng.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wei Jingsheng

Freedom of Conscience Act’’.

(b) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law,

for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

1101 et seq.), Wei Jingsheng shall be held and considered to have

been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence

as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment of

the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

Upon the granting of permanent residence to Wei Jingsheng

as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the

proper officer to reduce by one during the current fiscal year the

total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country

of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and

Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 158.103 Coverage. ( a ) *Talent management.* This part covers: ( 1 ) Establishing and administering CTMS; and
( 2 ) Establishing and managing the DHS-CS.
( b ) *Individuals.* This part applies to any individual: ( 1 ) Being recruited for employment under this part;
( 2 ) Applying for employment under this part;
( 3 ) Serving in a qualified position under this part;
( 4 ) Managing, or participating in the management of, any DHS-CS employee under this part, including as a supervisor or any other employee of the Department who has the authority to take, direct others to take, recommend, or approve any talent management action under this part; or
( 5 ) Serving on the Cybersecurity Talent Management Board described in § 158.302.
|  |
|--|
|  | **Introduction**

**Global Context of International Crime**

**International Crimes Affecting US Interests**
**Worldwide Areas of International Criminal         Activity**
**Consequences for US Strategic Interests**
**The Future of International Crime**
This Global assessment was prepared by a US Government interagency working         group in support of and pursuant to the President's International Crime         Control Strategy. Representatives from the Central Intelligence Agency;         Federal Bureau of Investigation; Drug Enforcement Administration; US Customs         Service; US Secret Service; Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; National         Drug Intelligence Center; the Departments of State, the Treasury, Justice,         and Transportation; the Office of National Drug Control Policy; and the         National Security Council participated in the drafting of this assessment.       

  |
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2012-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                     I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 23, 2016

 

 
|   | /s/ Brian E. Schaaf                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian E. Schaaf                                    |
|   | Vice President and   Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford Motor Credit   Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior officer in   charge of servicing function) |

 

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****New Jersey�s forests.**
 
2008 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.80:F 76/M 66/
Item Number:0083-B-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000869480
 
March 7, 2018