alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007115EN.01004101.xml

| 25.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/41

---

Call for proposals under the draft annual work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for 2007 (Commission Decision C(2007) 2183)

(2007/C 115/09)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, is hereby launching a call for proposals in order to award grants to projects in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the draft annual work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network for 2007.

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals, for 2007, is EUR 112 607 450.

The call is closing on 20 July 2007.

The complete text of the Call for proposals is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/grants/proposal_en.htm

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                                       
                         CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
     
     
     
     
     We consent to the inclusion in this Form 10-K and the incorporation by 
reference in the registration statements of CenterPoint Properties Trust 
(formerly CenterPoint Properties Corporation) on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-95792, 
33-99858 and 333-18235), Form S-8/S-3 (File Nos. 333-05087 and 333-34687) and 
Form S-8 (File No. 333-05141) of our report dated February 10, 1998, on our 
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement 
schedules of CenterPoint Properties Trust and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 
1997 and 1996, and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, 
which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Chicago, Illinois
March 18, 1998
#### E. Lawrence Fell, as President, etc., v. George L. Berry, as President, etc.

Stay vacated. Settle order on notice.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Guthrie, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ David Guthrie
David Guthrie, Principal Executive Officer

Date: November 21, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
| (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ James Kirsch                    |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   | James KirschChief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                |   |
|   |                                |   |
|   | /s/ Myrna Newman                    |   |
|   | Myrna NewmanChief Financial Officer |   |

----
# C_2007082EN.01000902.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/9

---

Order of the Court of 22 January 2007 — Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities

(Case C-373/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Decision not to promote an official to Grade LA 5 - Previous complaint - Identity of subject-matter and legal basis - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(2007/C 82/17)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Bart Nijs (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy and G. Corstens, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2005 in Case T-377/04 Nijs v Court of Auditors, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible the action for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors not to promote the appellant to the post of translator-reviser (LA 5) in the 2003 promotion exercise

Nijs

Court of Auditors

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Mr Nijs is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Nijs is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 330, 24.12.2005.

1

---
### §§1051 to 1053. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 1051, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §204(a), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1456; amended Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 524, §2, 43 Stat. 1262; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; June 3, 1935, ch. 164, §7, 49 Stat. 316; July 26, 1956, ch. 741, title I, §104(d), 70 Stat. 664, provided for discount rates to be charged by intermediate credit banks. See section 2075 of this title.

Section 1052, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §204(b), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1456; amended Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, placed a limitation on interest rate charged original borrower on paper discounted with bank.

Section 1053, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §204(c), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1456; amended Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §29, 50 Stat. 715, covered purchases by intermediate credit banks of debentures or other similar obligations issued by or for benefit of such bank or other intermediate credit banks.
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.202

## Section §107.202: Standards for determining preemption

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.202 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : Speeches / Testimony

# U.S. Pacific Command Change of Command As Delivered by Admiral Harry B. Harris, Jr.

By Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii

                Wednesday, May 27, 2015  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

USPACOM

change of command

ADMIRAL HARRIS

ADMIRAL HARRY B HARRIS JR

United States Pacific Command
#### CARROLL v. DANIELS CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 55PA90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 649

Petition by defendant (Insurance Company) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 10 May 1990.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1097

To offset the spending contained in the fiscal year 1999 emergency supplemental appropriations bill in order to protect the surpluses of the social

security trust funds.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 20, 1999

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. GRAMS, Mr.

INHOFE, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. SANTORUM) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to the

order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one committee reports, the other

committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

A BILL

To offset the spending contained in the fiscal year 1999

emergency supplemental appropriations bill in order to

protect the surpluses of the social security trust funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OFFSET OF EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL

4 SPENDING.

5 Not later than 15 days after Congress adjourns to

6 end the first session of the 106th Congress and on the

7 same day as a sequestration (if any) under sections 251
2

•S 1097 RIS

1 and 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

2 Control Act of 1985, the Director of the Office of Manage3 ment and Budget shall cause, in the same manner pre4 scribed for section 251 of that Act, a sequestration for

5 fiscal year 2000 of all non-exempt accounts within the dis6 cretionary spending category (excluding function 050 (na7 tional defense)) to achieve a reduction in budget authority

8 equal to $13,303,000,000 minus the dollar amount of re9 imbursements identified in the report required by section

10 2005 (efforts to increase burden-sharing) of the 1999

11 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          60,216
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   106
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    237,787
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,406
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,412
<LOANS>                                      1,687,772
<ALLOWANCE>                                     16,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,048,127
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,530,548
<SHORT-TERM>                                    30,277
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             20,401
<LONG-TERM>                                    188,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           268
<OTHER-SE>                                     278,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,048,127
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 88,038
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,041
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   369
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               101,448
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              39,935
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,426
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           55,022
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,225
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 165
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 32,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,555
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      28,555
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,367
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.94
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,763
<LOANS-PAST>                                       994
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,914
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      980
<RECOVERIES>                                       433
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               16,592
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            16,592
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2112-2113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Docket<greek-i> EPA-RO4-SFUND-2010-0965 FRL-9251-5]


Peach Orchard Road Groundwater Plume Site, Augusta, Richmond 
County, GA; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2113]]

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for 
reimbursement of past response costs concerning the Peach Orchard Road 
Groundwater Plume Site located in Augusta, Richmond County, Georgia for 
publication.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
February 11, 2011. The Agency will consider all comments received and 
may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-RO4-
SFUND-2010-0965 or Site name Peach Orchard Road Groundwater Plume 
Superfund Site by one of the following methods:
    <bullet> http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line 
instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/sf/enforce.htm.
    <bullet> E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afffcec6c1dbcadd81ffcedac3ceefcadfce81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a1a2b23243e2f38641a2b3f262b0a2f3a2b642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: November 17, 2010.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-497 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Steven F. Foreman v. Jessie P. Foreman

Appellate case number: 01-20-00589-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-56778

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Steven F. Foreman, has filed a motion with our Court requesting that we order 

the court reporter to correct and supplement the reporter’s record. Appellant also seeks an 

extension of time to file his brief until after the reporter’s record has been filed. Appellant’s request 

for supplementation of the reporter’s record may be made to the court reporter without an order by 

this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d) (“If anything relevant is omitted from the report’s record, 

the trial court, the appellate court, or any party may by letter direct the official court reporter to 

prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the 

omitted items.”); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(a), (b). Accordingly, appellant’s motion for this 

Court to order the court reporter to correct and supplement the record is denied. Further, from a 

review of our records, it appears that the appellate record is not complete because the reporter’s 

record has not been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1, 34.6(a). Appellant’s motion for extension of 

time to file his brief is denied as moot because appellant’s brief is not due until the appellate 

record is complete. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(2).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sherry Radack______

Acting individually 

Date: ____December 10, 2020____
5 F T T
IFNM4 | \ | |
— | ' | |
| | |
\ }
06 05 04 03 02 o1
| | | | :
| | | |
| | | |
|| i | |
pte POTS a a — FC = 7. | ——————— ==
617D4A g | j
| | | | “i
g | z | |
Ey \ 5 | I \
07 a Z 08 | 09 x) 10 11 | 412,
28 \ | a) 1 | \
/
| | |
| | |
ee nn nn i: ns an
| | |
| |
| |
| |
16 15 | 14. po 8 ’
| | |
| |
| |
| I
Manville Rd. |
| |
\ |
| |
21 \ 22 23 | a4
| |
1 |
|
| 2D
I eT aaa es es | See
| | 2
! a | 2
| z | 2
| zp a
28 27 a 26 a5
| |
| |
| |
| ee
- ‘Ironwood Forest National Monument a q/
| q
ey
31/ | 32, g i’ 33 | 34 35 re 36
o oD
f 13 4
| | D |

TRAVEL MANAGEMENT

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft Resource Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
March 2007

TRAVEL ROUTE INVENTORY

Township 13 South
Range 10 East

Gila and Salt River Principal Meridian, Arizona

ae National Monument Boundary

Public Lands Administered by the
Bureau of Land Management

State Trust Lands

Military Reservation

—— Monument Travel Route Inventory

Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheriod

NAD27 Datum

A

i} 1 Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
for the use of this map for purposes not intended by the BLM, or
to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information
shown. Spatial information may not meet National map Accuracy
Standards. This information may be updated without notification.

United States Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Management

Tucson Field Office

Arizona

S
#### Keith F. Fletcher et al., Individually and as Parents and Guardians of Jason M., an Infant, Appellants, v Lyndonville Central School District, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[823 NYS2d 744]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orleans County (James P. Punch, A.J.), entered November 7, 2005 in a personal *injury*action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of defendant Lyndonville Central School District for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for *1331reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Kehoe, J.E, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.