alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006303EN.01008702.xml

| 13.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/87

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4436 — Cinven/Gondola)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 303/31)

On 4 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4336. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4336. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
### Part F—Transfer of Functions and Personnel; Transitional Provisions
### §199. Approval of request

Such request, if approved by the Comptroller of the Currency, shall be, together with the certificate of facts in the case, and his recommendation as to the amount of money which, in his judgment, should be so used and employed, submitted to the Secretary of the Treasury, and if the same shall likewise be approved by him, the request shall be by the Comptroller of the Currency allowed, and notice thereof, with copies of the request, certificate of facts, and indorsement of approvals, shall be filed with the Treasurer of the United States.

(Mar. 29, 1886, ch. 28, §2, 24 Stat. 8.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Application to District of Columbia

Provisions of this section were made applicable to banks, etc., in the District of Columbia by act Mar. 4, 1933, ch. 274, §4, 47 Stat. 1567.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 55 of this title.
### §3804. Applicability of preemption provisions

(a) The provisions of section 3803 of this title shall not apply to any alternative mortgage transaction in any State made on or after the effective date (if such effective date occurs on or after October 15, 1982, and prior to a date three years after October 15, 1982) of a State law or a certification that the voters of such State have voted in favor of any provision, constitutional or otherwise, which states explicitly and by its terms that such State does not want the preemption provided in section 3803 of this title to apply with respect to alternative mortgage transactions (or to any class or type of alternative mortgage transaction) subject to the laws of such State, except that section 3803 of this title shall continue to apply to—

(1) any alternative mortgage transaction undertaken on or after such date pursuant to an agreement to undertake such alternative mortgage transaction which was entered into on or after October 15, 1982, and prior to such later date (the "preemption period"); and

(2) any renewal, extension, refinancing, or other modification of an alternative mortgage transaction that was entered into during the preemption period.

(b) An alternative mortgage transaction shall be deemed to have been undertaken during the preemption period to which this section applies if it—

(1) is funded or extended in whole or in part during the preemption period, regardless of whether pursuant to a commitment or other agreement therefor made prior to that period; or

(2) is a renewal, extension, refinancing, or other modification of an alternative mortgage transaction entered into before the preemption period and such renewal, extension, or other modification is made during such period with the written consent of any person obligated to repay such credit.

(Pub. L. 97–320, title VIII, §805, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1547; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §472], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1237.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–181 inserted "(or to any class or type of alternative mortgage transaction)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 15, 1982, see section 807(a) of Pub. L. 97–320, set out as a note under section 3801 of this title.
Order filed October 27, 2022

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-22-00219-CR

__________

IN RE EDDIE DALE UNDERWOOD

Original Mandamus Proceeding

O R D E R

We have reviewed the “Motion to Recuse Appellate Judges” filed in this cause 

on October 18, 2022, as it pertains to seeking the recusal of Justice W. Bruce 

Williams. Pursuant to Rule 16.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, 

Justice Williams has considered the motion in chambers. Justice Williams has 

found no reason to recuse himself and, pursuant to Rule 16.3(b), has certified the 

issue to the entire court for a determination by the other justices of this court.1

 See

TEX. R. APP. P. 16.3(b). Chief Justice John M. Bailey and Justice W. Stacy Trotter

have decided the matter without Justice Williams’s participation.

1

A copy of Justice Williams’s written certification is attached to this order.
2

The recusal of appellate court justices is controlled by Rule 16 of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. The grounds for recusal of an appellate court justice 

are provided in the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. TEX. R. APP. P. 16.2; see

TEX. R. CIV. P. 18b. We find no reason for Justice Williams to recuse himself and 

hold that none of the grounds set out in Rule 18b are applicable to Justice Williams

in this case. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 18b; see also Manges v. Guerra, 673 S.W.2d 180, 

185 (Tex. 1984); McCullough v. Kitzman, 50 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex. App.—Waco 

2001, pet. denied).

The request for the recusal of Justice W. Bruce Williams is denied.

PER CURIAM

October 27, 2022

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., and Trotter, J.

Williams, J., not participating.
# C_2006261EN.01003701.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/37

---

Action brought on 18 September 2006 — Diomede Basili v Commission

(Case F-108/06)

(2006/C 261/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Tamara Diomede Basili (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the career development report (CDR) notified to the applicant on 10 November 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the career development report (CDR) notified to the applicant on 10 November 2005;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a Commission official of grade AD 11, took part in the DG ECFIN Joint Evaluation Committee and in the Selection Board for competition COM/PA/04 during 2004. In her action, she challenges her CDR, in so far as it did not take into account the opinion of the ‘ad hoc working party and the staff representatives' suggestions for promotion’ laid down in Article 6(3)(c) of the general provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations (GIP). In addition to the infringement of that provision of the GIP, the applicant alleges the infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and of Article 1 of Annex II to the Staff Regulations.

---
<PAGE>

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated June 18, 1996, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of AmTec, Inc. (formerly AVIC
Group International, Inc.) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 1997.  We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of AmTec, Inc. (formerly AVIC Group International, Inc.)
on Forms S-8 (File nos. 333-15925, 333-20839, and 333-26435).



SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los Angeles, California
July 14, 1997
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.106 If a contract or grant agreement or portion thereof is retroceded, reassumed, terminated, or expires, may the Secretary reacquire title to excess or surplus Federal property of other agencies that was donated to an Indian tribe or tribal organization?

No. Section 105(f)(3) of the Act does not give the Secretary the authority to reacquire title to excess or surplus government property acquired from other agencies for donation to an Indian tribe or tribal organization.
## MAR YLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE E NV IR O N MENT 1800 Washington Boulevard -Baltimore MD 21230 

# MDE 410-537-3000 - 1-800-633-6101 Martin O ' Malley Shari T. Wilson Governor , Secretary Anthony G . Brown Robert M. Summers , Ph . D . Lieutenant Governor Deputy Secretary April 22 , 2009 Mr . Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator 

### (3RAOO) U.S . Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr . Garvin : The purpose of this letter is to submit the enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 

### # 10-02 concerning adoption of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for paper , film and foil coating. This SIP Revision includes amendments to Regulation .07 under COMAR 26 . 11 . 19 Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes . The Notice of Proposed Action for this SIP Revision was published in the Maryland Register on December 18 , 2009. A public hearing was held on January 21,2010. The amendments were adopted on March 21 , 2010 . The Notice of Final Action was published on April 9 , 2010 and the amendments became effecti ve on April 19 , 2010 . All administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the adoption process. If you have any questions concerning this SIP submittal , please feel free to call me at (410) 537­ 3084 or Mr . George (Tad) S . Aburn , Jr., Director of the Air and Radiation Management Administration , at (410) 537-3255 . Sincerely,

# il**L** Secretary STW :dhr Enclosures

Recyc led Paper w\\'w , mdc. s ta!e.lI1d . us TTY Users 1 - 800 -735-2258 Via Mary land Re lay S ervi c e
### §§131 to 138. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(e)(14)–(21), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2292

Section 131, R.S. §5226; June 20, 1874, ch. 343, §3, 18 Stat. 123, related to protest of notes and waiver of demand and notice of protest.

Section 132, R.S. §5227, related to appointment by Comptroller of the Currency of special agent to examine failure of national banking association to redeem its circulating notes and provided for forfeiture of association's bonds to United States based on findings of agent.

Section 133, R.S. §5228; Feb. 18, 1875, ch. 80, §1, 18 Stat. 320, prohibited banking associations from continuing in business after default.

Section 134, R.S. §5229, provided that, upon declaration of forfeiture of association's bonds, Comptroller of the Currency was to notify holders of circulating notes to present notes for payment and was authorized to cancel bonds pledged by association.

Section 135, R.S. §5232, related to disposition of redeemed notes and perpetuation of evidence of payment of such notes.

Section 136, R.S. §5233, related to cancellation of redeemed notes.

Section 137, R.S. §5230, provided Comptroller of the Currency with option of selling defaulting association's bonds at auction, rather than cancelling them, and granted United States paramount lien on all association assets in case of deficiencies from such sale.

Section 138, R.S. §5231, related to private sale of defaulting association's bonds by Comptroller of the Currency.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.16 How long does the Secretary have to review and approve the proposal and award the contract, or decline a proposal?

The Secretary has 90 days after receipt of a proposal to review and approve the proposal and award the contract or decline the proposal in compliance with section 102 of the Act and subpart E. At any time during the review period the Secretary may approve the proposal and award the requested contract.
### §121a. Redemption of notes unidentifiable as to bank of issue

Whenever any Federal Reserve bank notes or Federal Reserve notes are presented to the Treasurer of the United States for redemption and such notes cannot be identified as to the bank of issue or the bank through which issued, the Treasurer of the United States may redeem such notes under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe.

(June 13, 1933, ch. 62, §1, 48 Stat. 127; Pub. L. 89–427, §4(a), May 20, 1966, 80 Stat. 161; Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(g)(8)(A), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2294.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–325, §602(g)(8)(A)(ii), which directed the amendment of this section by striking out ", and the notes, other than Federal Reserves notes, so redeemed shall be forwarded to the Comptroller of the Currency for cancellation and destruction" after "Treasury may prescribe", was executed by striking out text which contained the word "Reserves" rather than "Reserve", to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 103–325, §602(g)(8)(A)(i), substituted "Whenever any Federal Reserve bank notes," for "Whenever any national-bank notes, Federal Reserve bank notes,".

1966—Pub. L. 89–427 excepted Federal Reserve notes from the category of notes which, upon redemption by the Treasurer of the United States, must be forwarded to the Comptroller of the Currency for cancellation and destruction.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 55 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.31 When the Secretary declines all or a portion of a proposal, is an Indian tribe or tribal organization entitled to any appeal?

Yes. The Indian tribe or tribal organization is entitled to an appeal on the objections raised by the Secretary, with an agency hearing on the record, and the right to engage in full discovery relevant to any issue raised in the matter. The procedures for appeals are in subpart L of these regulations. Alternatively, at its option the Indian tribe or tribal organization has the right to sue in Federal district court to challenge the Secretary's decision.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CEO CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), Joel A. Ronning, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Digital River, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

**1.    **The Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, and to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and

 

**2.    **The informationcontained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiods presented therein.

 

**In Witness Whereof**,the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 9th day of August2005.

 
|   | /s/ Joel  A. Ronning    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                    |
|   | Joel A.  Ronning        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Digital River, Inc. and will be retained by Digital River, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Regu[atory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAll.- Directorate 'J-o 1s- -c c -Oll-0-AD Identifier: -1\-8 

.1cld tftt' mJrf... /;ou/'1'. fJ<Irts cust, .111d 11111111>(.·r ot' I · S. l'<';.!i'llered J'l'llci/IUI to t/;,• l•thl< h,-/o 11 . II It,.,, \'o/1 ure 

!i!ll\hl'd • /i, ·I. oii/!J,· ·I ild,lil' Fieftf, .. hutfou ;u Cllllu!l/cl/ludh'.fi/1 ill ill· /o!rd\ 

Update Fields =-j _ __ _ 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Prod uct (e.g., aircraft, engine. 

(e.g .• Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor -t u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do nm include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection of all -- - ----·- - -

elevator. rudder. 

aileron. and 

ai leron-to-ruddeer 100 0 0 

interconnect 

primary control 

cables 

Replacement of all 

elevator, rudder, 

aileron. and 

ailcron-to-ruddccr 180 18,800 0 

interconnect 

primary control 

cables 

Check (set) flight 

control cable 25 0 0 

tension 

__ L_ - - - ----·-

---- ·--·-- - - --

9 
I I I I 

The known number of products in compliance: ', . .. 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: s 0 

Costs covered under warranty (if/mown) $ :. . .. ' 

On-Condition Costs: e 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g .. Inspection. (include access. (@$85/hour) 

testing. and close- replacement) up) 

·- -- I--

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this .field to explain anything in the F.stimated Costs 1ah/e 

1hat was assumed or might not be obvious. This .field can also be used lo explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the ~D be considered a "significant regulatory action''? G 

YES* 0 NO (8) 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* 0 NO 181 

*Explanation: 

RegulatOJ1' Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. 0 

YES ::J NO 181 

Explanation: 

Intrastate A\•iation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in A laska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? @ 

YES* 0 NO (8) 

*Explanation: 

10
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
200 West Street
New York, New York 10282


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
    Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-GCJ7

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2012 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Trustee ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the
year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 10, 2014

/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
### §335. Payment of personnel expenses necessary for participation in training program conducted by Colombia under the United States-Colombia Action Plan for Regional Security

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may pay the expendable training supplies, travel, subsistence, and similar personnel expenses of, and special compensation for, the following that the Secretary considers necessary for participation in the training program conducted by Colombia under the United States-Colombia Action Plan for Regional Security:

(1) Defense personnel of friendly foreign governments.

(2) With the concurrence of the Secretary of State, other personnel of friendly foreign governments and nongovernmental personnel.

(b) Limitation.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the authority provided in subsection (a) may only be used for the payment of such expenses of, and special compensation for, such personnel from developing countries.

(2) Exception.— The Secretary may authorize the payment of such expenses of, and special compensation for, such personnel from a country other than a developing country if the Secretary determines that such payment is—

(A) necessary to respond to extraordinary circumstances; and

(B) in the national security interest of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title XII, §1201(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2822.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 335 was renumbered section 255 of this title.
§ 13.19 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) The ALJ may schedule prehearing conferences as appropriate.
( b ) Upon the motion of any party, the ALJ will schedule at least one prehearing conference at a reasonable time in advance of the hearing.
( c ) The ALJ may use prehearing conferences to discuss the following: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite Statement;
( 3 ) Stipulations and admissions of fact or as to the contents and authenticity of Documents;
( 4 ) Whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record;
( 5 ) Whether a party chooses to waive appearance at an oral hearing and to submit only documentary evidence (subject to the objection of other parties) and written argument;
( 6 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 7 ) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 8 ) Discovery;
( 9 ) The time and place for the hearing; and
( 10 ) Such other matters as may tend to expedite the fair and just disposition of the proceedings.
( d ) The ALJ may issue an order containing all matters agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the ALJ at a prehearing conference.