alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §504. Sharing of compensation

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a person receiving compensation or reimbursement under section 503(b)(2) or 503(b)(4) of this title may not share or agree to share—

(1) any such compensation or reimbursement with another person; or

(2) any compensation or reimbursement received by another person under such sections.

(b)(1) A member, partner, or regular associate in a professional association, corporation, or partnership may share compensation or reimbursement received under section 503(b)(2) or 503(b)(4) of this title with another member, partner, or regular associate in such association, corporation, or partnership, and may share in any compensation or reimbursement received under such sections by another member, partner, or regular associate in such association, corporation, or partnership.

(2) An attorney for a creditor that files a petition under section 303 of this title may share compensation and reimbursement received under section 503(b)(4) of this title with any other attorney contributing to the services rendered or expenses incurred by such creditor's attorney.

(c) This section shall not apply with respect to sharing, or agreeing to share, compensation with a bona fide public service attorney referral program that operates in accordance with non-Federal law regulating attorney referral services and with rules of professional responsibility applicable to attorney acceptance of referrals.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2582; Pub. L. 109–8, title III, §326, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 99.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

Section 504 prohibits the sharing of compensation, or fee splitting, among attorneys, other professionals, or trustees. The section provides only two exceptions: partners or associates in the same professional association, partnership, or corporation may share compensation inter se; and attorneys for petitioning creditors that join in a petition commencing an involuntary case may share compensation.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–8 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
#### § 517.2 Public reading room.

Records that are required to be maintained by the Commission shall be available for public inspection and copying at 90 K Street NE, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20002. Reading room records created on or after November 1, 1996, shall be made available electronically via the Commission's website.
|

GRAVITY DEFUELING TRACKER
104 642 160°

TOTAL GALLONS DERUELED

— ; APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF FUEL REMOVED AS OF 10:00 AM DECEMBER I5, 2023

a

JTF-RH completed gravity defueling. Residual Fuel removal begins in January.
December 1994 Liaison Mailout (Archived)

1/2

December 1994 Liaison Mailout

December 28, 1994 

THE NTP LIAISON OFFICE IS PLEASED TO PROVIDE THE

FOLLOWING:

1) Request for input to be considered in the formulation of criteria for the

validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative testing methods and in the

establishment of a process through which scientifically validated alternative

methods can be accepted for regulatory use. 

2) Update on the Biennial Report on Carcinogens and Revision in the Timetable

for the Review of the Criteria Used for Inclusion of Substances by an Ad Hoc 

Working Group of the National Toxicology Program Board of Scientific Counselors.

VALIDATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF ALTERNATIVE TESTING

METHODS

 Comments and information are invited and encouraged prior to the preparation 

of a document to:

a) establish criteria for the validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative

testing methods; and

b) recommend a process through which scientifically validated alternative methods

can be accepted for regulatory use. THE DEADLINE FOR THIS INPUT IS

FEBRUARY 7, 1995. The document will be drafted by a government interagency

coordinating committee and will be made available for public comment prior to

finalization.

 The reverse side of this announcement provides background and more detailed 

information. Comments and questions can be directed to: Dr. William Stokes, 

NIEHS, MD-A2-05, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 

by telephone at 919 541 7997, or by Internet e-mail at Stokes@NIEHS.NIH.GOV.

BIENNIAL REPORT ON CARCINOGENS -- UPDATE
December 1994 Liaison Mailout (Archived)

2/2

Revision of Timetable for Review of Criteria:

The first step in the review of criteria is a two-day public meeting of the NTP

Board ad hoc BRC working group to review and make recommendations on the

criteria for listing substances in the BRC. This meeting, originally targeted in our

"timetable for review" for mid-January, is now targeted for the week of

February 27, 1995.

Update:

A draft discussion document prepared by NTP staff concerning the existing criteria

for selection is available upon request.

Additional background information will be prepared by the NTP Executive Committee

for use by the NTP Board ad hoc BRC working group. It is anticipated that this

document will be completed early February 1995.

Inquiries regarding the status of the upcoming meeting of the NTP Board BRC

ad hoc working group, requests for copies of the available background document

concerning existing criteria; and requests to receive the additional

background document to be prepared by the NTP Executive Committee should be

directed to: Dr. C. W. Jameson, NIEHS, MD WC-04, P.O. Box 12233, 

Re

The information on this page is archived and is provided for reference purposes only. 

This page is not updated and may become out­of­date.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-80 

June 11, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043(b)(8) Reportable Events. Mergers, Consolidations & other Transfers of Plan Assets 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of May 14, 1976 and subsequent telephone conversation with * * * of my staff.

As I understand the pertinent facts, * * * maintains a pension plan (the "Plan") which is funded pursuant to a trust

agreement with the * * * of * * * North Carolina * * * You indicated that * * * intends to enter into a similar agreement

with the * * * Trust Comany of New York * * * and then to transfer all Plan assets from * * * to * * * You further

indicated that after the transfer the assets of the Plan will be pooled for investment purposes with the assets of other

pension plans, but that Plan assets will be separately accounted for and held for the exclusive benefit of Plan participants.

In light of the foregoing, you asked whether the proposed transfer will result in an event described in § 4043(b)(8)

of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") which must be reported to this Corporation

pursuant to § 4043(a) of the Act. 

Since the event you described will not result in the transfer of assets from one plan to another plan, but rather

involves the substitution [*2] of one corporate trustee for another corporate trustee, the substitution does not constitute

a § 4043(b)(8) event. Accordingly, no notice is required to be submitted to this Corporation pursuant to § 4043(a) of

the Act. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### §352a. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–699, title VI, §601, Aug. 21, 1958, 72 Stat. 697

Section, act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §13b, as added June 19, 1934, ch. 653, §1, 48 Stat. 1105; amended Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title III, §323, 49 Stat. 714, authorized Federal Reserve Banks to make loans to industrial and commercial businesses and to discount or purchase industrial obligations from financial institutions, and created an industrial advisory committee.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 85–699, title VI, §601, Aug. 21, 1958, 72 Stat. 697, provided that the repeal of this section is effective one year after Aug. 21, 1958.

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 85–699, title VI, §601, Aug. 21, 1958, 72 Stat. 697, provided that the repeal of this section shall not affect the power of any Federal Reserve bank to carry out, or protect its interest under, any agreement theretofore made or transaction entered into in carrying on operations under this section.

#### Fund for Management Counseling

Pub. L. 85–699, title VI, §602(a), (b), Aug. 21, 1958, 72 Stat. 698, required Federal Reserve banks to repay to the United States certain amounts paid to them under 12 U.S.C. 352a, such amounts to be covered into a special fund for grants under section 636 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. See text of note set out under that section.
§ 81.35 When must the Secretarial Election Board send ballots to voters? ( a ) Unless the amendment or adoption articles of the tribe's governing document require the use of polling sites in the election, the election must be conducted entirely by mailout ballots, and the Secretarial Election Board must send mailout ballots to registered voters promptly upon completion of the Registered Voters List.
( b ) When the amendment or adoption articles of the tribe's governing document require the use of polling sites in the election, the Secretarial Election Board must send an absentee ballot to every registered voter who requests an absentee ballot, as long as the request is received before the Secretarial election date.
( c ) All mailout or absentee ballot deliveries must be via U.S. Mail or by hand-delivery to the location identified in the Secretarial election notice before the date of the Secretarial election.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00269-CR

Byron Dale Brinkley, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. A-02-0862-S, HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A juryfound appellantByronDaleBrinkleyguilty of five counts of aggravated sexual

assault of a child. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2004). For each count, the jury

assessed a forty-three year prison term and a $10,000 fine.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, who was advised of his

right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: January 15, 2004

Do Not Publish
§ 309.20 What are examples of sculpture, carving, and pipes that are Indian products? ( a ) Sculpture, carving, and pipes made by an Indian, including, but not limited to, wood, soapstone, alabaster, pipestone, argillite, turquoise, ivory, baleen, bone, antler, and shell, are Indian products.
( b ) Specific examples include, but are not limited to: kachina dolls, fetishes, animal figurines, pipestone pipes, moose antler combs, argillite bowls, ivory cribbage boards, whalebone masks, elk horn purses, and clamshell gorgets.
[68 FR 35170, June 12, 2003]
### §2096. Agreements for sharing gains or losses

Each Farm Credit Bank may enter into agreements with Federal land bank associations in its district for sharing the gain or losses on loans or on security held therefor or acquired in liquidation thereof, and associations are authorized to enter into any such agreements and also, subject to bank approval, agreements with other associations in the district for sharing the risk of loss on loans endorsed by each such association. As may be authorized by the bank in accordance with regulations of the Farm Credit Administration, associations also may enter into agreements with other Farm Credit System institutions to share loan and other losses, whether to protect against capital impairment or for any other purpose.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title II, §2.14, formerly §2.15, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1636; renumbered §2.14, Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §401(w), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 999.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2096, Pub. L. 92–181, title II, §2.15, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 601; Pub. L. 96–592, title II, §210, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3442; Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §205(b), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1703; Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §431(f), title VIII, §805(i), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1660, 1715; Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §415(b), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1004, related to short- and intermediate-term loans, participation, other financial assistance, terms, conditions, interest, and security, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 100–233, §401.

A prior section 2.14 of Pub. L. 92–181 was classified to section 2095 of this title and was repealed by Pub. L. 100–399, §401(v).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1622, provided that this section is effective 6 months after Jan. 6, 1988.
# C_2007069EN.01000902.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Pequena Instância Criminal do Porto lodged on 2 February 2007 — Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional (CA/LPFP) and Baw International Ltd v Departamento de Jogos da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa

(Case C-42/07)

(2007/C 69/20)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal de Pequena Instância Criminal do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional (CA/LPFP) and Baw International Ltd

Applicants:

Defendant: Departamento de Jogos da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the monopoly granted to Santa Casa [da Misericórdia de Lisboa], when relied on against Baw [International Ltd], that is to say, against a provider of services established in another Member State in which it lawfully provides similar services, which has no physical establishment in Portugal, constitute an impediment to the free provision of services, in breach of the principles of freedom to provide services, freedom of establishment and the free movement of payments enshrined in Articles 49, 43 and 56 respectively of the EC Treaty? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the monopoly granted to Santa Casa [da Misericórdia de Lisboa], when relied on against Baw [International Ltd], that is to say, against a provider of services established in another Member State in which it lawfully provides similar services, which has no physical establishment in Portugal, constitute an impediment to the free provision of services, in breach of the principles of freedom to provide services, freedom of establishment and the free movement of payments enshrined in Articles 49, 43 and 56 respectively of the EC Treaty?

Santa Casa [da Misericórdia de Lisboa]

Baw [International Ltd]

| 2. | Is it contrary to Community law, in particular to the abovementioned principles, for rules of domestic law such as those at issue in the main proceedings first to establish a monopoly in favour of a single body for the operation of lotteries and mutual betting and then to extend that monopoly to ‘the entire national territory, including ... the internet’? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it contrary to Community law, in particular to the abovementioned principles, for rules of domestic law such as those at issue in the main proceedings first to establish a monopoly in favour of a single body for the operation of lotteries and mutual betting and then to extend that monopoly to ‘the entire national territory, including ... the internet’?

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CFO CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), Thomas M.Donnelly, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Digital River, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

**1.    **The Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, and to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and

 

**2.    **The informationcontained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiods presented therein.

 

**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 9th day of August2005.

 
|   | /s/ Thomas  M.Donnelly   |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   |                     |
|   | Thomas M.Donnelly        |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Digital River, Inc. and will be retained by Digital River, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
# C_2006294EN.01003704.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/37

---

Order of the President of the Court of 31 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-81/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/73)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 08.04.2006.

1

---
# C_2007082EN.01005304.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/53

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 February 2007 — MCC v Commission

(Case T-41/02) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/112)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 4.5.2002.

1

---
# C_2007082EN.01001002.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/10

---

Order of the Court of 12 December 2006 — Autosalone Ispra Snc v European Atomic Energy Community

(Case C-129/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Non-contractual liability of the European Atomic Energy Community - Overflowing drain - Misinterpretation of the evidence - Measures of inquiry)

(2007/C 82/20)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Autosalone Ispra Snc (represented by: B. Casu, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Atomic Energy Community, represented by the Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. de March, Agent, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2005 in Case T-250/02 Autosalone Ispra v Commission, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed an application for a declaration that the Community was liable for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of an overflowing drain the management and maintenance of which are the responsibility of the Joint Research Centre in Ispra — Breach of the procedural rules concerning the burden of proof

Autosalone Ispra

Commission

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Autosalone Ispra Snc to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Autosalone Ispra Snc to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

1

---
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee October 20, 2022 Meeting Minutes

FINAL-LIBSAC-Minutes-Oct-20-2022.pdf (259.2 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
Exhibit 3.1

** **

**CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION**

** **

**OF**

** **

**AMERICAN HONDA RECEIVABLES LLC**

 

This Certificate of Formationof American Honda Receivables LLC(the “**Company**”),dated as of March 16, 2011, is duly executed and filed to form a limited liability company in accordance with the Delaware LimitedLiability Company Act (6 Del. C. §18-201, et seq.).

 

1.          Name.The name of the limited liability company is American Honda Receivables LLC.

 

2.          RegisteredOffice. The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street,in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

3.          RegisteredAgent. The name and address of its registered agent for service of process in the State of Delaware is The Corporation TrustCompany, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

** **

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of American Honda Receivables LLC as of the 16th day of March, 2011.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Respondent-Appellee, *v.*Charles M. Howell, Petitioner-Appellant.

(No. 72-270;

Fifth District

November 15, 1974.

Robert E. Farrell, of Mt. Vernon, and Martin Carlson, of Chicago, both of State Appellate Defender’s Office, for appellant.

W. C. Spomer, State’s Attorney, of Cairo, for the People.

PER CURIAM.

CARTER, J., took no part.