alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William A. Donius, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added
by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |        |  |                                     
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ William A. Donius               
|                  |  | Name:  |  | William A. Donius                   
|                  |  | Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 
-  Rulemaking 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

## Contact Us

Hazardous Materials Standards and Rulemaking
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**infocntr@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-8553****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922****Fax:**202-366-7435**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Hazardous Materials Petitions

## About Petitions for Rulemaking

The table below lists open petitions for rulemaking that PHMSA has received requesting amendments to the Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR Parts 171-180). The Petition Number (e.g., P-0001), the Docket ID, and the Name of Petitioner are listed, and the links provided to Regulations.gov allow for access and participation to those specific petitions. Regulations.gov is your source for information on the development of Federal regulations and other related documents issued by the U.S. government. Through the site, you can find, read, and comment on regulatory issues that are important to you. Finally, you can also access previously closed petitions on the Regulations.gov site, by entering the appropriate Docket ID in the "Search for Dockets" page.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

American Sign LanguageDeafnessElementary Secondary EducationGraduation RequirementsHigher EducationSecond Language InstructionSecond Language Learning

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
-  Home 
-  Newsroom 

# In This Section

                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Reports to Congress 
                      -  Congressional Testimony 
                      -  Speeches 

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Report to Congress - Pipeline Safety FY22 Hiring Actuals and FY23 Hiring Plan

PHMSA Report to Congress - Pipeline Safety FY 2022 Hiring Actuals and FY 2023 Hiring Plan.pdf (300.64 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
{"agency":"PRC","generated":"2019-07-16 12:36:52","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2019"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["PRC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["6"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["6"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2019","quarter":"Q3"}
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 668 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 668

 To provide for the consideration by the United States Court of Claims 
          of a bill for compensation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2000

Mr. Rohrabacher submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To provide for the consideration by the United States Court of Claims 
          of a bill for compensation, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That the bill for the compensation of persons suffering 
injury or property loss as a result of the destruction of a 
pharmaceutical plant in the Sudan by the United States on August 20, 
1998, now pending in the House of Representatives is hereby referred to 
the United States Claims Court; that the Chief Judge of the United 
States Claims Court shall proceed with the same in accordance with the 
provision of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code; 
and that the court shall file its reports within 18 months from the 
dates of filing of the claims on behalf of such persons in the court 
giving such findings of fact and conclusions of law therein.
                                 <all>
```
#### Michael Retzker and Others, Respondents, v. Jacob Baumann, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge 

Sandra L. Stewart 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Julian Craig Young 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A , 

2
# C_2007129EN.01001902.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/19

---

Action brought on 11 April 2007 — Alcon v OHIM — *Acri.Tec (BioVisc)

(Case T-106/07)

(2007/C 129/34)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Alcon, Inc. (Hünenberg, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: *Acri.Tec AG Gesellschaft für ophthalmologische Produkte (Hennigsdorf, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 February 2007 in Case R 660/2006-2 Alcon, Inc. v. OHIM (BioVisc) be annulled insofar as it dismissed the opposition of Alcon, Inc. against CTM application 3 651 809 ‘BioVisc’; |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 February 2007 in Case R 660/2006-2 Alcon, Inc. v. OHIM (BioVisc) be annulled insofar as it dismissed the opposition of Alcon, Inc. against CTM application 3 651 809 ‘BioVisc’;

| — | the Office for Harmonisation be ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

the Office for Harmonisation be ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: *Acri.Tec AG Gesellschaft für ophthalmologische Produkte

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘BioVisc ’for goods in class 5 — application No 3 651 809

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community and international word marks ‘PROVISC ’and ‘DUOVISC ’for goods in class 5

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division's decision and rejection of the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The trade marks in question are confusingly similar and the goods applied for are identical to those covered by the opposition trade marks.

Pleas in law:

---
#### James O. Cox, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*Anthony C. Abbington, Defendant-Appellee.

(No. 59307;

First District (3rd Division)

November 21, 1974.

Allen J. Sucherman, of Chicago, for appellant.

Gates W. Clancy and James S. Mills, both of Chicago, for appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE DEMPSEY

delivered the opinion of the court:

Mildred Cox was a passenger in a bus which was brought to a stop because of an accident which had occurred on the highway. The defendant, Anthony Abbington, drove his vehicle into the stopped bus and Mrs. Cox was injured. Her husband, the plaintiff, James Cox, filed a complaint against Abbington for the medical expenses he had paid on behalf of his wife and for the loss of her consortium.

Mrs. Cox was injured on May 14, 1969, and her husband’s complaint was filed in January 1973. Abbington moved to dismiss the complaint for the reason that it had not been filed within 2 years of her injury. The trial court sustained the motion. Cox appeals and contends that a 5-year, rather than a 2-year, period of limitation is applicable to his cause of action.

Abbington relies on section 14 of “An Act in regard to limitations” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 83, par. 15) and on *Kolar v. City of Chicago,*12 Ill.App.3d 887, 299 N.E.2d 479. Cox relies on section 15 of the Act and on *Mitchell v. White Motor Co.,*13 Ill.App.3d 872, 301 N.E.2d 166. Section 14 provides for a 2-year period of limitation in personal injury actions. Section 15 states that there shall be a 5-year period of limitation in certain enumerated actions and for all other civil actions not expressly governed by other statutes. Abbington argues that Cox’s action arose as a consequence of his wife’s personal injuries. Cox responds that his claims *221come within the ambit of section 15 because their limitation period is not specifically covered by another statute.

*Kolar,*decided in June 1973, held that the 2-year statute of limitations barred a husband’s suit for loss of consortium and medical expenses incurred by him as a result of his wife’s injuries, which occurred more than 2 years but less than 5 years before his suit was filed. The opinion in *Mitchell,*which was filed in August 1973, held the opposite. The *Mitchell*court was unaware of the *Kolar*decision and stated that no State court in Illinois had ever passed upon the issue.

The issue has now been resolved. The Supreme Court overruled *Kolar*and affirmed *Mitchell. (Mitchell v. White Motor Co.*(1974), 58 Ill.2d 159, 317 N.E.2d 505.) The dismissal of Cox’s complaint must, therefore, be vacated.

Reversed and remanded.

McNAMARA, P. J., and McGLOON, J., concur.
§ 158.521 Employment eligibility requirements and employment-related criteria. ( a ) *Employment eligibility requirements.* To be eligible for employment in the DHS-CS, an individual must: ( 1 ) Meet U.S. citizenship requirements as described in governing Appropriation Acts; and
( 2 ) Comply with Selective Service System requirements described in 5 U.S.C. 3328.
( b ) *Employment-related criteria.* The Department determines criteria related to employment in the DHS-CS, reviews individuals applying for employment in the DHS-CS using such criteria, and, as part of an offer of appointment to a qualified position, provides written notice of specific, applicable employment-related criteria necessary to obtain and maintain, employment in the DHS-CS. Employment-related criteria include: ( 1 ) Fitness standards and similar factors described in Executive orders, 5 CFR 302.203, and policies of the Department;
( 2 ) Personnel security requirements related to fitness standards and similar factors described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
( 3 ) Geographic mobility requirements; and
( 4 ) Other criteria related to any aspect of appointment or employment, including selection, appointments, qualified positions, or assignments, or some or all of the foregoing.
( c ) *Accepting and maintaining employment-related criteria.* To be appointed to a qualified position, an individual must accept and satisfy the specific, applicable employment-related criteria associated with the individual's offer of appointment concurrent with the individual's acceptance of the offer of appointment. An individual's acceptance of an appointment to a qualified position constitutes acceptance of applicable employment-related criteria for that qualified position and the individual's agreement to satisfy and maintain those criteria.
( d ) *Changes to employment-related criteria.* Employment-related criteria may change, and DHS-CS employees may be required to accept and satisfy such changes to maintain employment in the DHS-CS.
( e ) *Disqualification.* The Department may disqualify an individual from consideration for employment in the DHS-CS or from appointment to a qualified position for: Providing false information to the Department, engaging in dishonest conduct with the Department, unauthorized disclosure of assessment materials for purposes of giving any applicant an advantage in the assessment process, or other actions related to an individual's character or conduct that may negatively impact the integrity or efficiency of the DHS-CS.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11247-11248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than March 16, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President), 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-
1414:
    1. M.S.B. Corporation, Central City, Iowa; to engage de novo 
through its subsidiary, BORE Properties, Inc., Central City, Iowa, in 
extending credit and servicing loans, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) 
of Regulation Y.


[[Page 11248]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 24, 
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-4487 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# CA2007110EN.01000301.xml

| 16.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 110/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 110/3

---

RESERVE LIST
   (1)

RESERVE LIST

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/48/06

OPEN COMPETITION

HEADS OF UNIT (AD9)

HEADS OF UNIT

OF CZECH CITIZENSHIP

OF CZECH CITIZENSHIP

(2007/C 110 A/01)

| 1. | KUBICEK Jiri |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | ZEMAN Stanislav |

1.

KUBICEK Jiri

2.

ZEMAN Stanislav

The list will be valid until 31 December 2007 and may be extended.

31 December 2007

---

(1)  At a candidate's request, his/her name will not be published.

1

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00378-CV

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS 

SYSTEM, Appellant

V.

LISA BARRINGER, Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from 

County Court at Law No. 2

of Denton County (CV-2017-00827)

September 10, 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s order denying 

University of North Texas System’s plea to the jurisdiction is reversed, and we render 

a judgment that Lisa Barringer’s suit be dismissed. 

It is further ordered that appellee Lisa Barringer shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
### [§2377. Renumbered §3453]
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.713

## Section §107.713: Approval modification, suspension or termination

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.713 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses