alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
D. King, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      April 15, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Stephen D. KingStephen
      D. KingChief
      Executive Officer
### [§2672a. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–163, div. B, title XXVIII, §2821(f), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3513]

Section, added Pub. L. 94–107, title VI, §607(8), Oct. 7, 1975, 89 Stat. 566; amended Pub. L. 98–525, title XIV, §1405(39), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2624; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1502(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X, §1031(a)(29), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1599; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1084(d)(23), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2062; Pub. L. 109–163, div. B, title XXVIII, §2821(a)(6), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3511, related to acquisition of interests in land when need is urgent. See section 2663(d) of this title.
### §1442a. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–102, title VI, §606(c), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1454

Section, act July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §22A, as added Aug. 10, 1987, Pub. L. 100–86, title IV, §407(d), 101 Stat. 617, related to informal review of certain supervisory decisions.
268 Canal Rd

Waterloo, SC 29384

Tel: (864) 980-8881 Fax: (864) 998-3407

ctdevon@embarqmail.com

30th April 2015

Dear Sirs,

I am writing to file a petition for an exemption under section 333.

I would like to use a UAS for the purposes of Real Estate Photography.

Aircraft – DJI Phantom 2 Quadcopter operating on 5.8 GHz Control frequency.

Aircraft will be operated in GPS mode that will limit altitude and operational flight 

radius automatically.

Maximum altitude set to 400 ft as per FAA ruling.

Maximum Radius set to 400 ft due to keeping aircraft in visual line of sight.

Payload – GoPro3 Camera on Gimbal mount, WiFi operating on 2.4 GHz.

Operation – As is the case with any Aircraft, I will conduct a pre-flight procedure. 

Regarding the DJI phantom 2 - before take-off the Aircraft must be inspected to 

ensure that it is in airworthy condition. The radio control transmitter must be set up 

correctly, all switches correctlt configured. The aircraft must obtain a reliable GPS 

lock to ensure correct operation of in-flight stabilization and ‘Return Home’ 

function in event of transmitter malfunction.

Flights will only be conducted in calm and fine weather conditions.

Operation will be avoided if there are too many obstacles in the area.

Most photography will be executed from an altitude of less than 80 ft AGL.

(We have been using a telescoping mast for 3 years that delivers satisfactory

results from a 40 ft elevation.)

Occasional operation to maximum allowed altitude of 400 ft AGL, mainly for large 

agricultural or commercial properties.

Maximum speed not in excess of 5 knots, most photography is conducted using a 

walk behind the aircraft method and then adjusting Altitude and Lateral location to 

achieve the desired Photograph.
I agree to abide by FAA rules regarding Airport proximity and designated no-fly 

zones.

All operations will be conducted in a safe manner, any persons on the property will 

be indoors or behind operator location.

Operations will only be conducted with permission from property owners.

Thank you for your consideration.

Regards.

Chris Thompson

Birdseye Pix and VT
EXHIBIT 34.1




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Management Committee


BMW Financial Services NA, LLC





We have examined BMW Financial Services NA, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange  Commission's Regulation AB for Asset-Backed Securities, BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2012-1 (except for the servicing criteria described in the following paragraph), which the Company has determined as being applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2012 and for the period from April 26, 2012 to December 31, 2012. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria based on our examination.





The Company has determined that the servicing criteria in Items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x)(A)-(C), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset−backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2012 and for the period from April 26, 2012 to December 31, 2012.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph of this report and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph.





In our opinion, BMW Financial Services NA, LLC complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of December 31, 2012 and for the period from April 26, 2012 to December 31, 2012.





/s/ CohnReznick LLP





Roseland, New Jersey


March 20, 2013
# C_2006331EN.01002603.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 23 November 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-224/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 331/56)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)   OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

1

---
EXHIBIT
10.75


Wits
Basin Precious Minerals Inc.


900
IDS Center


80
South 8th Street


Minneapolis
MN 55402-8773





December
17, 2009





Pioneer
Holdings, LLC


Attn: C.
Andrew Martin


4520 Main
Street, Suite 1650


Kansas
City, MO  64111





Re:
            Chile
      Loan




Dear
Andrew:




The
purpose of this letter is to confirm and formalize our agreements with respect
to that certain loan by Pioneer Holdings, LLC (“Pioneer”) to Wits Basin Precious
Minerals Inc. (together with any subsidiary created for the purposes of
operations in Chile, “Wits Basin”) of $30,000 on May 11, 2009 (the
“Loan”).




The Loan
is to be repaid by Wits Basin to Pioneer prior to the payment of any
distributions by Wits Basin relating to proceeds from its operations out of the
property acquired in Chile; provided that, the Loan shall be earlier repaid at
such time Wits Basin raises through debt or equity financing specifically
relating to its prospects in Chile an aggregate of $100,000.  In
addition to such repayment, Pioneer shall also be entitled to receive 50% of the
first $540,000 in aggregate distributions of earnings, profits and/or cash
relating to the Chile operations (resulting in a aggregate distribution to
Pioneer of $270,000 in addition to the repayment of the original
Loan).  In the event Wits Basin sells its rights in Chile to a third
party, it will be required to repay the Loan out of any proceeds from such
sale.




As
additional consideration for the Loan, Pioneer shall also be entitled to receive
(i) a non-dilutive net smelter right (the “NSR”) equal to two percent (2%) of
Net Smelter Returns relating to the Chile property and (ii) a five-year warrant
to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of Wits Basin common stock at an exercise
price of $0.01 per share.  For purposes of this letter agreement, “Net
Smelter Returns” shall mean (i) all revenue received by or credited to the
Company from purchases of mineral product on the Chile property (as determined
by fair market value of such mineral product assuming arms’ length negotiation)
(ii) less all direct expenses incurred by the Company in the extraction,
transportation, processing and sale of such mineral product from the Chile
property.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, Wits Basin shall have the
right to repurchase, at any time, the NSR for a purchase price of
$100,000.




If the
terms referenced above are consistent with your understanding of our agreements,
please acknowledge the terms of this letter below where noted.  If
this does not comport with your understanding, please feel free to contact me at
(678) 222-0291.   Thank you.




Sincerely,/s/ Stephen D. KingStephen
      D. KingChief
      Executive Officer




Acknowledged
and Agreed To:




Pioneer
Holdings, LLC




By
              /s/ C. Andrew MartinC.
      Andrew Martin, Manager
#### § 46.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects.

Certain types of applications for grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts are submitted to Federal departments or agencies with the knowledge that subjects may be involved within the period of support, but definite plans would not normally be set forth in the application or proposal. These include activities such as institutional type grants when selection of specific projects is the institution's responsibility; research training grants in which the activities involving subjects remain to be selected; and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments, prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. Except for research waived under § 46.101(i) or exempted under § 46.104, no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB, as provided in this policy, and certification submitted, by the institution, to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, lodged on 12 September 2006 — Benetton Group SpA v G-Star International B.V.

(Case C-371/06)

(2006/C 294/41)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Benetton Group SpA

Defendant: G-Star International B.V.

Questions referred

----

(1)  First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 1).

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          867760
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   122988
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                991997
<PP&E>                                        17812334
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3078381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                16226764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           552785
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    15541979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  16226764
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1568056
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   236299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 84583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 923484
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             923484
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    923484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     18.5
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     18.5
        

</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

DATE: November 20, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD

SUBJECT: June 27, 2014 Brief Remarks Regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants at the meeting of the Environmental Section of the Dallas 

Bar Association

SUMMARY

Brief remarks (part of a larger priorities presentation) were made by EPA at the meeting of the 

Environmental Section of the Dallas Bar Association on the proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Large group setting 

EPA Participant: Cheryl Seager (Deputy Regional Counsel)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Benefits 
-  When and How PBGC Pays Benefits 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# When and How PBGC Pays Benefits

## 

Please choose the category that applies to you.
                            -  Not yet receiving benefits 
                            -  Already receiving benefits 
                            -  Information for executors or estate administrators 

##           Your PBGC Benefit Options FAQs          

PBGC pays benefits in a variety of ways. Learn about the benefit options available to you if you are not yet receiving benefits when PBGC takes over your plan.

##           PBGC Payment Dates          

See when PBGC will be paying benefits by Electronic Direct Deposit (EDD) or by check for the current and future years.

September 13, 2021

##           Contact Us      

Visit our Contact Us page for more information.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Crowley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/JOHN P. CROWLEYJohn P. Crowley Chief Financial Officer |  | 
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | November 2, 2007                                          |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
# C_2007082EN.01000101.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/1

---

(2007/C 82/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 69, 24.3.2007

OJ C 69, 24.3.2007

Past publications

OJ C 56, 10.3.2007

OJ C 42, 24.2.2007

OJ C 20, 27.1.2007

OJ C 331, 30.12.2006

OJ C 326, 30.12.2006

OJ C 310, 16.12.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### §§ 100.37-100.50 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the
Company), for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Weldon, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Steven Weldon      
|Steven Weldon          
|Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 8, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1098

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to modify service

requirements relating to creditable service with congressional campaign

committees.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 20, 1999

Mr. DODD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to

modify service requirements relating to creditable service

with congressional campaign committees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CREDITABLE SERVICE WITH CONGRESSIONAL

4 CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES.

5 Section 8332(m)(1)(A) of title 5, United States Code,

6 is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 1098 IS

1 ‘‘(A) such employee has at least 4 years

2 and 6 months of service on such committees as

3 of December 12, 1980; and’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


     Each of the undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly  Report of Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending October 1, 2006, fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of
the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  NOVEMBER 9, 2006
        ----------------


                                              /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                              ------------------------
                                               Timothy T. Tevens
                                               Chief Executive Officer



                                              /S/ KAREN L. HOWARD
                                              ------------------------
                                               Karen L. Howard
                                               Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. EVERETT

No. 157A90

Case below: 98 N.C.App. 23

Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas and temporary stay denied 23 April 1990. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
### §8777. Quarters: Nurse Corps officers; assignment in hospitals

Under such regulations as the Secretary of the Navy prescribes, officers in the Nurse Corps may be assigned quarters in naval hospitals.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 469, §7577; renumbered §8777, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7577 | 34 U.S.C. 43h(a) (2d proviso, less 1st 21 words). | Apr. 16, 1947, ch. 38, §208(a) (2d proviso, less 1st 25 words), 61 Stat. 50. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7577 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Working with PHMSA 
-  State Programs 

# In This Section

                      -  State Programs Overview 
                      -  Federal/State Legislative Authorities 
                      -  Compliance 
                      -  State Oversight 
                      -  Incident Information 

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Fax:**202-366-4566****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# State Oversight

PHMSA is authorized to reimburse a State agency up to 80 percent of the agency's actual cost for carrying out its pipeline safety or underground natural gas storage safety program(s), including the cost of personnel and equipment. The actual amount of Federal reimbursement depends upon the availability of appropriated funds and the State's pipeline safety or underground natural gas storage program's performance. A State agency's program performance is based on PHMSA's annual Program Evaluation and Progress Report scoring of each State agency.

The Program Evaluation considers a State's performance in achieving established goals for pipeline safety or underground natural gas storage safety programs set by PHMSA. The Program Evaluation includes an on-site review of the State’s inspection, compliance, incident investigation, training, and excavation damage prevention records and activities.

The Progress Report scoring gives consideration to the State’s extent of safety authority over pipeline operators, inspector qualifications, inspection days accomplished, adoption of maximum civil penalty amounts, progress adopting amendments to the Federal regulations, adoption of one call requirements, and attendance at key safety meetings.

## Program Evaluations

Click here to search individual State Program Evaluations by year

Click here to search State Underground Natural Gas Storage Safety Program Evaluations by year 

## State Guidelines

Guidelines for States Participating in the Pipeline Safety Program

Guidelines for States Participating in the Underground Natural Gas Storage Safety Program