alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 665 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 325
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 665

                         [Report No. 106-1022]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (S. 2796) to provide for the conservation and development of water 
   and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to 
 construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of 
               the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 1, 2000

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (S. 2796) to provide for the conservation and development of water 
   and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to 
 construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of 
               the United States, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 2796) 
to provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report 
shall be considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 325

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 665

                         [Report No. 106-1022]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (S. 2796) to provide for the conservation and development of water 
   and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to 
 construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of 
               the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 1, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```
***Exhibit 32.1***

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly filing of Meier Worldwide Intermedia Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, James Meier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 15, 2004

By:/s/ James Meier
   James Meier, President, CEO and Chief Accounting Officer
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,407
<INVENTORY>                                      2,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,599
<PP&E>                                          70,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,106
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           212
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,241
<SALES>                                        111,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,671
<CGS>                                           50,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   308
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,306
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,021
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,021
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
No. 9937.

#### The State ex rel F. Lamarque vs. L. A. Burthe, Recorder.

The Supreme Court can exercise its jurisdiction in so far only as it shall have knowledge of the matters argued and contested *below.*

■A wm?id«mwwill not lie to a recorder for refusing to allow an appeal fiom a judgment inflicting a fine for the violation of a municipal ordinance, when the constitutionality or legality of the ordinance authorizing the fine was not contested and put at issue before the judgment.

*Mandamus*does not lie to compel the granting of an appeal in a case which, on the face of the papers, is unappealable.

^PPLICATION for Mandamus.

*Selden.*and *Armbruster,*for the Relator.

The opinion of the Court was deliveied by

Bermudez, C. J.

The Relator applies for a *mandamus*to' compel the recorder to grant him a suspensive appeal from a judgment inflicting a fine on him for the violation of a municipal ordinance,charged with illegality as having been previously repealed.

The recorder, in an elaborate return, denies that the constitutionality or legality of the ordinance was, in any manner, put at issue before him.

The relator has adduced no proof to show the reverse.

This Court surely could, in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction, review a judgment, for any amount, rendered in furtherance of a municipal ordinance assailed as unconstitutional or illegal, where such judgment has passed on such issue; but in the absence of such plea, it would be powerless to adjudicate upon the correctness of such judgment

The Constitution vests it with appellate jurisdiction m cases in which the constitutionality or legality of any fine imposed by a municipal corporation is in *contestation.*Art. 81.

“ The Supreme Court can only exercise its jurisdiction in so far as it shall have knowledge of the matters argued or *contested*below.’ C. P. 895.

As the legality of the fine was not *contested*below, it could not be *contested*on appeal.

The recorder has, therefore, properly refused the appeal.

It is, therefore, ordered that the application for a *mandamus*be refused, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 102 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 102

To provide that the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House 
  of Representatives shall include an estimate of Federal retirement 
 benefits for each Member of Congress in their semiannual reports, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

  Mr. Abraham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House 
  of Representatives shall include an estimate of Federal retirement 
 benefits for each Member of Congress in their semiannual reports, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE OF ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL RETIREMENT BENEFITS OF 
              MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Section 105(a) of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 1965 (2 U.S.C. 104a; Public Law 88-454; 78 Stat. 
550) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(4) The Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall include in each semiannual report submitted under 
paragraph (1), with respect to Members of Congress, as applicable--
            ``(A) the total amount of individual contributions made by 
        each Member to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund 
        and the Thrift Savings Fund under chapters 83 and 84 of title 
        5, United States Code, for all Federal service performed by the 
        Member as a Member of Congress and as a Federal employee;
            ``(B) an estimate of the annuity each Member would be 
        entitled to receive under chapters 83 and 84 of such title 
        based on the earliest possible date to receive annuity payments 
        by reason of retirement (other than disability retirement) 
        which begins after the date of expiration of the term of office 
        such Member is serving; and
            ``(C) any other information necessary to enable the public 
        to accurately compute the Federal retirement benefits of each 
        Member based on various assumptions of years of service and age 
        of separation from service by reason of retirement.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect 1 year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21.01

SUBSIDIARIES

|                                        |  |                         
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|NAME
  OF THE COMPANY                   |  | STATE
  OF INCORPORATION
|                                        |  |                         
|Daniel M. Friedman &
  Associates, Inc. |  | New
  York              
|                                        |  |                         
|Diva Acquisition Corp.                  |  | Delaware                
|                                        |  |                         
|Adesso-Madden, Inc.                     |  | New
  York              
|                                        |  |                         
|Madden Direct, Inc.                     |  | Delaware                
|                                        |  |                         
|Steven Madden Construction
  Corp.      |  | Delaware                
|                                        |  |                         
|Steven Madden Retail, Inc.              |  | Delaware                
|                                        |  |                         
|Shoe Biz, Inc.                          |  | Delaware                
|                                        |  |                         
|Stevies, Inc.                           |  | Delaware                
|                                        |  |                         
|Unionbay Mens Footwear,
  Inc.         |  | Delaware                

---
IV

House Calendar No. 325

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 665

[Report No. 106–1022]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (S. 2796) to provide for the conservation and development of water

and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the

United States, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 1, 2000

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (S. 2796) to provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources,

to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct

various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors

of the United States, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (S. 2796) to provide for the conservation
2

HRES 665 RH

1 and development of water and related resources, to au2 thorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various

3 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the

4 United States, and for other purposes. All points of order

5 against the conference report and against its consideration

6 are waived. The conference report shall be considered as

7 read.

House Calendar No. 325

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 665

[Report No. 106–1022]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 2796) to provide

for the conservation and development of waterand related resources, to authorize the Secretaryof the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the UnitedStates, and for other purposes.

NOVEMBER 1, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Louis L’Heureux

*Jonathan E. Gilbert,*in support of the motion.

Submitted February 25

decided March 7, 1974

The defendant’s motion for review of rectification of appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted. The court did not err in correcting its judgment as it was printed in the original record on appeal.
#### § 83.27 What are technical assistance reviews?

Technical assistance reviews are preliminary reviews for OFA to tell the petitioner where there appear to be evidentiary gaps for the criteria that will be under review in that phase and to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to supplement or revise the documented petition.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 388]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ388.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 2688]]

Public Law 109-388
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey Paint Bank National 
  Fish Hatchery and Wytheville National Fish Hatchery to the State of 
            Virginia. <<NOTE: Dec. 12, 2006 -  [H.R. 5061]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Paint Bank and 
Wytheville National Fish Hatcheries Conveyance Act.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Paint Bank and Wytheville National 
Fish Hatcheries Conveyance Act''.
SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF PAINT BANK AND WYTHEVILLE NATIONAL FISH 
                    HATCHERIES TO THE STATE OF VIRGINIA.

    (a) In <<NOTE: Deadline.>> General.--Within 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey 
to the State of Virginia without reimbursement all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the property described in 
subsection (b) for use by the Virginia Department of Fish and Game as 
part of the State of Virginia fish culture program.

    (b) Property Described.--The property referred to in subsection (a) 
consists of--
            (1) the real property comprising Paint Bank National Fish 
        Hatchery and Wytheville National Fish Hatchery, located at Paint 
        Bank and Wytheville, Virginia, respectively, as described in the 
        1982 Cooperative Agreement between the United States Fish and 
        Wildlife Service and the State of Virginia;
            (2) all improvements and related personal property under the 
        control of the Secretary that is located on that real property, 
        including buildings, structures, and equipment; and
            (3) all easements, leases, and water rights relating to the 
        property described in paragraphs (1) and (2).

    (c) Reversionary Interest.--If any of the property conveyed to the 
State of Virginia under this section is used for any purpose other than 
the use authorized under subsection (a), all right, title, and interest 
in and to all property conveyed under this section shall revert to the 
United States. The State of Virginia shall ensure

[[Page 120 STAT. 2689]]

that all property reverting to the United States under this subsection 
is in substantially the same or better condition as at the time of 
transfer to the State.

    Approved December 12, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5061:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-533 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-341 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 10, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,751,615
<SECURITIES>                                 1,985,556
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,227,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                    78,000
<INVENTORY>                                     46,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,021,397
<PP&E>                                       2,176,950
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,260,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,937,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,661,753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,705
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,085,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,937,635
<SALES>                                      4,015,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,527,351
<CGS>                                        1,104,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,225,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,769,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,203,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,209,449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,209,449)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7740

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHARON PENDERGRASS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-216, CA-97-1249-21B-4) Submitted: June 16, 1998 Decided: July 30, 1998 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sharon Pendergrass, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Gordon Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Sharon Pendergrass seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Pendergrass , Nos. CR-92-216; CA-97-1249-21B-4 (D.S.C. Nov. 13, 1997). We also deny Pendergrass’ “Motion Requesting Additional Grounds to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Set Aside/ Vacate or Correct A Sentence.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2006331EN.01004701.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 14 December 2006 — Kubanksi v Commission of the European Communities

(Case F-88/05) (1)

1

(Temporary staff - Article 5(3)(a) of the Staff Regulations - Article 82(2) of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities - Withdrawal of the decision to employ the applicant as a member of the temporary staff in grade B*4 - Level of qualifications required to be employed in grade B* - New contract staff contract)

(2006/C 331/104)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Gabrielle Kubanksi (Leggiuno, Italy) (represented by: M. Condinanzi and D. Bono, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.Currall and M. Velardo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission's decision revoking the decision to employ the applicant as a member of the temporary staff in grade B*4

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 16 December 2004 terminating the temporary staff contract signed on 4 October 2004 by Ms Kubanski; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 16 December 2004 terminating the temporary staff contract signed on 4 October 2004 by Ms Kubanski;

| 2. | dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 280, 12.11.2005, p. 20 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-353/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---