alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10.13 

11/8/04 

 Page 1 

Quitting Tobacco: Short-term and Long-term Health Benefits 

The positive effects of quitting begin very soon after you stop using tobacco and continue long 

after you’ve quit. 

Short-term Benefits 

• Your blood pressure, pulse, and body temperature, which were abnormally elevated by 

nicotine, return to normal. Persons taking blood pressure medication should continue 

doing so until told otherwise by their physician. 

• Your body starts to heal itself. Carbon monoxide and oxygen levels in your blood return 

to normal. 

• Your chance of having a heart attack goes down. 

• Nerve endings start to regrow. Your ability to taste and smell improves. 

• Your breathing passages (bronchial tubes) relax, lung capacity goes up, and your 

breathing becomes easier. 

• Your circulation improves and your lungs become stronger, making it easier to walk. 

• In your lungs, the cilia (hairlike structures on the lining) begin to regrow, increasing the 

ability of your lungs to handle mucus, to clean themselves, and to reduce infection. 

Coughing, sinus congestion, fatigue, and shortness of breath decrease. Your overall 

energy level increases. 

Long-term Benefits 

• As a former smoker, your chance of dying from lung cancer is less than it would be if 

you continued to smoke. Your chance of getting cancer of the throat, bladder, kidney, or 

pancreas also decreases. 

How To Get Help 

• If you or someone you know wants help with giving up tobacco, please call the National 

Cancer Institute’s Smoking Quitline toll-free at 1–877–44U–QUIT (1–877–448–7848). 

The information specialists on the Quitline can provide suggestions and support to help 

smokers break the habit. 

• The Federal Government’s Smokefree.gov Web site (http://www.smokefree.gov) allows 

you to choose the help that best fits your needs. You can get immediate assistance: 

o View an online step-by-step cessation guide. 

o Find state quitline telephone numbers. 
10.13 

11/8/04 

 Page 2 

o Instant message an expert through NCI’s LiveHelp service. 

o Download, print, or order publications about quitting smoking. 

# # # 

 

This fact sheet was reviewed on 11/8/04 

This fact sheet was adapted from material developed by the Tobacco Education and Prevention Program 

of the Arizona Department of Health Services and the Arizona Smokers’ Helpline of the University of 

Arizona.
# C_2006178EN.01002905.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-352/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 178/52)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 12.11.2005.

1

---
#### In the Matter of Philip J. Devine, an Attorney, Respondent, Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[824 NYS2d 784]

*1179Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1961. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Oneonta, Otsego County.

Having reviewed a Referee’s report issued after a hearing and having considered petitioner’s motion to confirm the report in part and to disaffirm the report in part and respondent’s reply to the motion, we find respondent guilty of the following professional misconduct. Respondent distributed advance commissions to the executors of an estate without court approval, in violation of this Court’s attorney disciplinary rules *(see*Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 [a] [5] [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (5)]) and SCPA 2311. He then filed a petition for judicial settlement of account of the estate with the Surrogate’s Court which failed to disclose the advance executors’ commissions, which totaled $20,000 between 1996 and 2000 *(see*DR 1-102 [a] [4], [5], [7]; DR 7-102 [a] [3] [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (4), (5), (7); 1200.33 (a) (3)]). After realizing his error but prior to filing the petition, respondent deposited $20,000 of his own funds into the estate account to replace the improperly advanced commissions and to avoid the embarrassment of disclosure. Respondent engaged in a conflict of interest by loaning funds of the estate ($14,500) to an individual with whom respondent had an ongoing business relationship, without full disclosure to the executors or obtaining their prior consent *(see*DR 5-101 [22 NYCRR 1200.20]). Since he did not have explicit authority to make a transfer from the estate account to his personal account for this loan, respondent converted estate funds *(see*DR 1-102 [a] [5], [7]; DR 9-102 [a], [e] [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (5), (7); 1200.46 (a), (e)j). We find that the conversion was not motivated by any larcenous intent.

We confirm the Referee’s report insofar as it made findings consistent with this decision and we disaffirm the report insofar as it made inconsistent findings. We grant petitioner’s motion in part and disaffirm the report in part, accordingly.

Under all of the circumstances presented, we conclude that censure is the appropriate disciplinary sanction *(see e.g. Matter of Glavin,*214 AD2d 803 [1995]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent is found guilty of the profes*1180sional misconduct set forth in charges I, II and IV of the petition and charge III of the petition insofar as it alleges violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (a) (5) and (7) and DR 9-102 (a) and (e) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [5], [7]; 1200.46 [a], [e]); and it is further ordered that the Referee’s report is confirmed insofar as it made findings consistent with this decision and is disaffirmed insofar as it made inconsistent findings; and it is further ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted in part and denied in part in accordance with this decision; and it is further ordered that respondent is censured.
#### § 89.32 Notice from the principal officer.

Notice of intention to negotiate with attorneys or with technical specialists shall be sent by the principal tribal officer to the Superintendent. Such notice shall be accompanied by a full statement concerning the need for retaining counsel or specialists, as the case may be, the purpose for which such assistance is needed and the scope of the intended employment. The notice and statement shall be transmitted to the Area Director by the Superintendent together with the latter's report and recommendations with respect to the approval of such contract.

[37 FR 10440, May 23, 1972. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
# C_2007020EN.01001302.xml

| 27.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/13

---

Appeal brought on 30 November 2006 by Commission of the European Communities against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) delivered on 6 September 2006 in Case T-304/04 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic, Wam SpA

(Case C-494/06 P)

(2007/C 20/20)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Italian Republic, Wam SpA

Other parties to the proceedings:

Forms of order sought

| — | Set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 6 September 2006 in Joined Cases T-304/04 and T-316/04 Italian Republic and Wam SpA v Commission of the European Communities and, in so doing, |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 6 September 2006 in Joined Cases T-304/04 and T-316/04 Italian Republic and Wam SpA v Commission of the European Communities and, in so doing,

Italian Republic and Wam SpA

Commission of the European Communities

| — | give a final ruling on the dispute and dismiss the action as unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

—

give a final ruling on the dispute and dismiss the action as unfounded;

| — | in the alternative, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance for a new ruling; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance for a new ruling;

| — | order the Italian Republic and Wam SpA to pay the costs of the proceedings, together with the costs of the proceedings at first instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic and Wam SpA to pay the costs of the proceedings, together with the costs of the proceedings at first instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission puts forward a single ground of appeal. In finding that the contested decision failed to give adequate reasons to enable the effect of the aid on trade and competition to be identified, the Court of First Instance has infringed Article 87(1) EC, read in conjunction with Article 253 EC, and has stated contradictory grounds for the judgment.

---
# C_2006261EN.01003801.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/38

---

(2006/C 261/76)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 249, 14.10.2006

OJ C 249, 14.10.2006

Past publications

OJ C 237, 30.9.2006

OJ C 224, 16.9.2006

OJ C 212, 2.9.2006

OJ C 190, 12.8.2006

OJ C 178, 29.7.2006

OJ C 165, 15.7.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2006261EN.01001601.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/16

---

Action brought on 14 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-375/06)

(2006/C 261/29)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Caeiros and B. Schima, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | primarily, a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/105/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003 amending Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 2 of Directive 2003/105/EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

primarily, a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/105/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003 amending Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 2 of Directive 2003/105/EC;

1

| — | or, alternatively, a declaration that by failing forthwith to inform the Commission of such provisions, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 2 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

or, alternatively, a declaration that by failing forthwith to inform the Commission of such provisions, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 2 of that directive;

| — | an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of that directive into domestic law expired on 1 July 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 345, p. 97

1

---
# C_2007074EN.01000901.xml

| 31.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/9

---

MEDIA 2007

MEDIA

Call for Proposals — EACEA/12/07

Support for the implementation of Pilot Projects

(2007/C 74/06)

1.   Objectives and Description

This notice of a call for proposals is based on Decision No 1718/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 concerning the implementation of a programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007) (1).

1

The measures covered by the Decision include the implementation of Pilot Projects:

| 1. | Distribution: new ways of creating and distributing European content via non linear services |
| --- | --- |

1.

Distribution: new ways of creating and distributing European content via non linear services

| 2. | Networked databases of audiovisual content to broaden and strengthen the access and the exploitation of catalogues |
| --- | --- |

2.

Networked databases of audiovisual content to broaden and strengthen the access and the exploitation of catalogues

| 3. | Previously funded Projects: Projects which have received funding under a previous MEDIA Plus Pilot Project Call for Proposals |
| --- | --- |

3.

Previously funded Projects: Projects which have received funding under a previous MEDIA Plus Pilot Project Call for Proposals

2.   Eligible applicants

This notice is aimed at European companies whose activities contribute to the attainment of the above objectives.

Applicants must be established in one of the following countries:

| — | the 27 countries of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

the 27 countries of the European Union,

| — | the EFTA countries and Switzerland (subject to the conclusion of a new cooperation agreement with this country in the framework of the MEDIA programme). |
| --- | --- |

—

the EFTA countries and Switzerland (subject to the conclusion of a new cooperation agreement with this country in the framework of the MEDIA programme).

3.   Budget and Duration of projects

The total budget available is EUR 2 million.

The financial contribution will take the form of a grant. The financial contribution awarded will in no event exceed 50 % of the eligible costs.

The maximum duration of the projects is 12 months.

4.   Deadline for submission of applications

Applications must be submitted to the Executive Agency (EACEA) no later than 2 July 2007.

2 July 2007

5.   Further information

The full text of the call for proposals, together with the application forms, can be found at the following Internet address:

http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/media/pilot/forms/index_en.htm

Applications must comply with all the terms of the guidelines and be submitted on the forms provided.

---

(1)  OJ L 327, 24.11.2006, p. 12.

1

---
### §1831. Separability of certain provisions of this chapter

The provisions of this chapter limiting the insurance of the deposits of any depositor to a maximum less than the full amount shall be independent and separable from each and all of the provisions of this chapter.

(Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 967, §2[23], formerly §2[21], 64 Stat. 894; renumbered §2[22], Pub. L. 90–203, §3, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 610; renumbered §2[23], Pub. L. 91–508, title I, §101, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1114.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Section is derived from subsec. (z) of former section 264 of this title. See Codification note set out under section 1811 of this title.
§ 83.31 Can OFA suspend review of a documented petition? ( a ) OFA can suspend review of a documented petition, either conditionally or for a stated period, upon: ( 1 ) A showing to the petitioner that there are technical or administrative problems that temporarily preclude continuing review; and
( 2 ) Approval by the Assistant Secretary.
( b ) Upon resolution of the technical or administrative problems that led to the suspension, the documented petition will have the same priority on the numbered register of documented petitions to the extent possible. ( 1 ) OFA will notify the petitioner and those listed in § 83.22(d) when it suspends and when it resumes review of the documented petition.
( 2 ) Upon the resumption of review, OFA will have the full six months to issue a proposed finding.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Airman�smanual**** 
SuDocNumber:D301.7/8:
ItemNumber:0421-A-03(online)
CGPSystem Number: 000599609
 
1999
2004
2005**
§ 700.269 Accounting for disclosures. ( a ) *Maintenance of an accounting.* ( 1 ) Where a record is disclosed to any person, or to another agency, under any of the specific exceptions provided by § 700.267(c), an accounting shall be made.
( 2 ) The accounting shall record ( i ) the date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure of a record to any person or to another agency and
( ii ) the name and address of the person or agency to whom the disclosure was made.
( 3 ) Accountings prepared under this section shall be maintained for at least five years or the life of the record, whichever is longer, after the disclosure for which the accounting is made.
( b ) *Access to accountings.* ( 1 ) Except for accountings of disclosures made under § 700.267(c)(5), accountings of all disclosures of a record shall be made available to the individual to whom the record relates at his request.
( 2 ) An individual desiring access to accountings of disclosures of a record pertaining to him shall submit his request by following the procedures of § 700.277.
( c ) *Notification of disclosure.* When a record is disclosed pursuant to § 700.267(c)(9) as the result of the order of a court of competent juridiction, reasonable efforts shall be made to notify the individual to whom the record pertains as soon as the order becomes a matter of public record.
### §1850. Acquisition of subsidiary and tying arrangement: Federal Reserve Board proceedings; application for authorization; competitor as party in interest and person aggrieved; judicial review

With respect to any proceeding before the Federal Reserve Board wherein an applicant seeks authority to acquire a subsidiary which is a bank under section 1842 of this title or to engage in an activity otherwise prohibited under chapter 22 of this title, a party who would become a competitor of the applicant or subsidiary thereof by virtue of the applicant's or its subsidiary's acquisition, entry into the business involved, or activity, shall have the right to be a party in interest in the proceeding and, in the event of an adverse order of the Board, shall have the right as an aggrieved party to obtain judicial review thereof as provided in section 1848 of this title or as otherwise provided by law.

(Pub. L. 91–607, title I, §105, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1766; Pub. L. 106–102, title I, §102(b)(1), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970, and not as part of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–102 struck out ", to engage directly or indirectly in a nonbanking activity pursuant to section 1843 of this title," after "section 1842 of this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–102 effective 120 days after Nov. 12, 1999, see section 161 of Pub. L. 106–102, set out as a note under section 24 of this title.
#### Michael Walsh, Appellant, *v.*The Continental Iron Works, Respondent.

*Negligence*— *master and servant*— *injury to woi'kman by caving in of trench*— *duty to sheath trench site feet deep.*

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered in the Kings county clerk’s office'on the 3d day of June, 1907, upon a dismissal of the complaint at the close of the evidence at the Kings Trial Term, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Judgment and order affirmed, with.costs. 2STo opinion. Woodward, Jenks and Miller, JJ., concurred; Gaynor, J., read for reversal, with whom Hooker, J., concurred.

Gaynor, J. (dissenting):

A trench six feet in depth which the plaintiff and other workmen were just finishing the digging of caved in and hurt the plain*896tiff. ■ The dismissal'of the complaint at the. close of all the evidence was error. No sheathing was furnished to the workmen and the trench was not sheathed up. It was for the jury to say whether this was not neglect of duty by the defendant to its workmen. If the trench were nine or twelve feet deep we would have no question Of this, nor will we when we pause to think how deep six feet is. Only a very few men reach that height. *(Farrell*v. *City of Middletown,*172 N. Y. 666; *Reilly*v. *Troy Brick Co.,*184 id. 399). In such dangérous employments the' master owes his men intelligent, and sometimes scientific, oversight, care and direction. Whether - the plaintiff acquiesced in the risk was a question of fact. The judgment should be reversed. Hooker,- J., concurred.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 97

Calling upon Haiti’s political leaders to seek agreement on transparent, free,

and widely participatory elections, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1999

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. DIXON, Ms.

BROWN of Florida, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. OWENS, Ms.

WATERS, and Mr. PAYNE) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Calling upon Haiti’s political leaders to seek agreement on

transparent, free, and widely participatory elections, and

for other purposes.

Whereas Haiti has been without a functioning government

since June 1997, because Haiti’s political leaders have

failed to come to agreement on a prime minister and

have failed to resolve the contested April 1997 elections;

Whereas this lack of a functioning government and of a willingness to compromise has hindered the flow of international assistance to and increased the suffering of the

Haitian people;
2

•HRES 97 IH

Whereas this suffering has drained the Haitian people’s confidence in democracy and eroded international goodwill

for Haiti;

Whereas the House of Representatives is concerned that the

political impasse between President Pre ́val and the Parliament is having an adverse effect on democracy in Haiti

and may adversely influence the independence of the Haitian national police;

Whereas the murder of Senator Jean-Yvon Toussaint on

March 1, 1999, contributes to a climate of insecurity and

mistrust; and

Whereas any replacement of elected local officials threatens

to undermine the ability of Haiti to conduct fully free

and fair elections: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) calls on Haiti’s political leaders to seek

3 compromise and agreement in order to form a non4 partisan, professional, and competent provisional

5 electoral council that can convene transparent, free,

6 and widely participatory elections as soon as prac7 tically possible; and

8 (2) affirms the commitment made by the

9 United Nations to support only an electoral process

10 that is free and fair and open to participation by all

11 of Haiti’s political and civil society leaders.

Æ