alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2403. Functions of Commission

#### (a) Study, investigation, and recommendations; considerations

The Commission shall conduct a thorough study and investigation and recommend appropriate administrative action and legislation necessary in connection with the possible development of public or private electronic fund transfer systems, taking into account, among other things—

(1) the need to preserve competition among the financial institutions and other business enterprises using such a system;

(2) the need to promote competition among financial institutions and to assure Government regulation and involvement or participation in a system competitive with the private sector be kept to a minimum;

(3) the need to prevent unfair or discriminatory practices by any financial institution or business enterprise using or desiring to use such a system;

(4) the need to afford maximum user and consumer convenience;

(5) the need to afford maximum user and consumer rights to privacy and confidentiality;

(6) the impact of such a system on economic and monetary policy;

(7) the implications of such a system on the availability of credit;

(8) the implications of such a system expanding internationally and into other forms of electronic communications; and

(9) the need to protect the legal rights of users and consumers.

#### (b) Interim and final reports; submission dates; transmittal of final report to President and Congress; contents; availability to public; termination date of Commission

The Commission shall make an interim report within one year of the date of the confirmation by the Senate of the Chairperson or the appointment by the President of an acting Chairperson and at such other times as it deems advisable and shall transmit to the President and to the Congress not later than two years after the date of the confirmation by the Senate of the Chairperson or the appointment by the President of an acting Chairperson, a final report of its findings and recommendations. Any such report shall include all hearing transcripts, staff studies, and other material used in preparation of the report. The interim and final reports shall be made available to the public upon transmittal. Sixty days after transmission of its final report the Commission shall cease to exist.

#### (c) Clearance by Federal agencies prior to transmittal of interim or final report

The Commission shall not be required to obtain the clearance of any Federal agency prior to the transmittal of any interim or final report.

(Pub. L. 93–495, title II, §203, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1508; Pub. L. 94–200, title II, §201, Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1124.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1975—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–200 changed the time for submission of interim and final reports from one year of the Commission's findings and recommendations and two years after Oct. 28, 1974, to one year and two years respectively after the confirmation by the Senate of the Chairperson or the appointment by the President of an acting Chairperson.
#### § 11.8 Suspension or revocation of eligibility for loans and loan guarantees, licenses, permits, or privileges.

The authority to extend financial assistance in the form of a loan, loan guarantee, or loan insurance to any person delinquent on a nontax debt owed to DHS is delegated to the Chief Financial Officer.
# C_2006326EN.01008601.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/86

---

Action brought on 13 November 2006 — Sotgia v Commission

(Case F-130/06)

(2006/C 326/173)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Stefano Sotgia (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the individual decision concerning a transfer from temporary staff status to official status taking effect on 16 April 2006, notified on 2 May 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the individual decision concerning a transfer from temporary staff status to official status taking effect on 16 April 2006, notified on 2 May 2006;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, after having worked at the Commission for several years as a member of temporary staff in Grade A5, then A*11, was successful in open competition EPSO/A/18/04 to draw up a reserve list for administrators in career bracket A7/A6. As a result, he was appointed as an official in the same post he had occupied as a member of the temporary staff and classified in Grade A*6, step 2, in accordance with Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations.

In support of his action, the applicant invokes infringement of Articles 31 and 62 of the Staff Regulations and Articles 5 and 2 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.

The applicant moreover submits infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations, the principle of the protection of acquired rights and the principle of equal treatment.

---
§ 13.27 Computation of time. ( a ) In computing any period of time under this part or in an order issued thereunder, the time begins with the day following the act, event, or default, and includes the last day of the period, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday observed by the Federal Government, in which event it includes the next business day.
( b ) When the period of time allowed is less than seven days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays observed by the Federal Government will be excluded from the computation.
( c ) Where a Document has been served or issued by placing it in the United States mail, an additional five days will be added to the time permitted for any responses.
§ 158.655 Administering compensation in accordance with relevant provisions of other laws. ( a ) For purposes of administering compensation authorized under §§ 158.650 through 158.654 in accordance with relevant provisions of other laws: ( 1 ) The Department may convert a DHS-CS employee's salary into an hourly rate, biweekly rate, or other rate, and administer compensation based on consideration of the DHS-CS employee's work schedule under the work scheduling system described in § 158.705;
( 2 ) A DHS-CS employee's hours of work and related computations are determined under the relevant provisions of law referenced in §§ 158.650 through 158.654 and CTMS policy implementing this section;
( 3 ) A DHS-CS employee on a part-time schedule described in § 158.705 is treated as if the employee is serving “part-time career employment” defined in 5 CFR 340.101; and
( 4 ) A DHS-CS employee on a contingent schedule described in § 158.705 is treated as if the employee is serving “intermittent employment” defined in 5 CFR 340.401.
( b ) If, in administering compensation under §§ 158.650 through 158.654, the Department determines it is necessary to clarify the relationship between those sections and the relevant provisions of law referenced in those sections and any other relevant provisions of other laws, the Department will address the issue in new or revised CTMS policy.
U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

To Whom It May Concern,

Co mments to DOT in respect of Resolution 787

SAS wish to make the following remarks in respect of the filing by IATA of Resolution 787, which we would wish the Department to take into consideration;

Airlines are currently unable to deliver their full product offerings to consumers through the indi rect channel today because the GDS network is based on data transmission

. Today’s GDS distribution network was developed more than 40 years ago before the Internet offered the ability to widely distribute airline tickets. The Internet and modern data pro cessing capabilities allow airlines to now distribute their products directly to consumers without filing with third parties. The airline industry would never have developed the current GDS distribution network if the Internet existed at the time.

An up dated data transmission standard based on XML will make it easier, faster and cheaper to provide the customer more information about fare alternatives, ancillary services and on board amenities

. Today, airlines are using the Internet to make dynamic offe rs directly to airline customers through their website s . Airlines are increasingly choosing this distribution method because it allows them to display their complete offers and better tailor those offers to meet the stated needs of the particular customer.

Adoption of the data transmission standard envisioned by Resolution 787 by the industry will allow for more competition in the distribution of airline tickets. Having a common XML based standard will enable developers to offer more efficient ways to di stribute airline tickets and provide the consumers with the information they need on complete airline offers to make an informed choice that meets their particular needs.

The GDS incumbents are seeking to protect their investment in an antiquated networ k that does not meet the needs of today’s air traveler. They are also using their market power to suppress competition in the indirect distribution channel. The U.S. Justice Department has an active investigation into the anticompetitive business practices of the GDSs in the United States.If adopted widely, NDC will result in airlines having to compete directly with one another on service

offerings as well as price. Consumers will be able to pick what they want in an airline offer through a menu of o ptions, which can then be compared to similar offers by other airlines. Competition normally results in lower prices and better customer service

.

To summarize, we are convinced that NDC will be of value to customers, airlines , the communities we

serve and ultimately to the wider economy

.

Yours sincerely

Hans Ollongren

Senior Vice President

SAS Group
# C_2007076EN.01000101.xml

| 4.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

3,82 % on 1 April 2007

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 April 2007

(2007/C 76/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3358 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 158,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4514 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67610 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3631 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6275 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,66 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1700 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5812 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,011 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7084 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8536 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3400 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,267 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8473 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6409 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5467 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4392 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8538 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0285 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 251,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6420 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3277 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4135 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 145,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6225 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,018 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,422 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3358

JPY

Japanese yen

158,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4514

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67610

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3631

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6275

ISK

Iceland króna

88,66

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1700

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5812

CZK

Czech koruna

28,011

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7084

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8536

RON

Romanian leu

3,3400

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,267

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8473

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6409

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5467

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4392

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8538

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0285

KRW

South Korean won

1 251,31

ZAR

South African rand

9,6420

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3277

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4135

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 145,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6225

PHP

Philippine peso

64,018

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7150

THB

Thai baht

43,422

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
#### § 48.103 What facilities may be leased?

Any portion of a Bureau-operated school facility may be leased as long as the lease does not interfere with the normal operations of the Bureau-operated school, student body, or staff, and otherwise meets applicable requirements of this part.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Liu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David LiuDavid LiuChairman and Chief Executive Officer





Date: May 10, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alliance
BioEnergy Plus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Form 10-K") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: April 14, 2015

/s/ Daniel de
      LiegeDaniel de LiegeChief Executive Officer,
      President, Secretaryand Chief Financial Officer
      (PrincipalExecutive Officer)


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ALLIANCE
BIOENERGY PLUS, INC. and will be retained by ALLIANCE BIOENERGY PLUS, INC. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
#### § 307.2 Certificates of genuineness; by whom affixed.

Government certificates of genuineness for Navajo all-wool woven fabrics may be affixed to fabrics meeting the conditions specified in § 307.4 by persons duly authorized to affix such certificates, under license issued by the Indian Arts and Crafts Board.
### Discount Rates
### §2219c. Affirmative action

All institutions of the Farm Credit System with more than 20 employees shall establish and maintain an affirmative action program plan that applies the affirmative action standards otherwise applied to contractors of the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.38, formerly §4.37, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §427, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1657; renumbered §4.38, Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §413, Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1004; amended Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(26), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4682.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "All" for "The Assistance Board established under section 2278a of this title and all".
#### § 201.1 Purpose and scope.

This part prescribes procedures for handling ex parte communications made in connection with public funding, Commission audits, litigation, rulemaking proceedings and the advisory opinion process. Rules governing such communications made in connection with Commission enforcement actions are found at 11 CFR 111.22, while provisions setting forth employee responsibilities under the Commission's Standards of Conduct rules are found at 11 CFR 7.8.

[58 FR 59645, Nov. 10, 1993, as amended at 76 FR 70331, Nov. 14, 2011]
H. Res. 75

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 24, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 409) to improve the effectiveness and performance of Federal financial assistance programs, simplify Federal financial assistance application and reporting requirements, and improve the delivery of services to the public. The

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Government

Reform. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. Each section of the

bill shall be considered as read. During consideration of the

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to
2

•HRES 75 EH

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### ADAMS v. MOORE

No. 565P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 359

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990.
Exhibit 4.12b


 


CERTIFICATE
OF TRUST


OF


CT
PUBLIC PREFERRED TRUST II


 


This Certificate of Trust of CT Public Preferred Trust II (the “Trust”),
dated as of May 14, 2008, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware
Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801, et  seq.)(the “Act”).


 


1.             Name.  The name of the statutory trust being formed
hereby is CT Public Preferred Trust II.


 


2.             Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust, with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware, are BNYM
(Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.


 


3.             Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
as of its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate
of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act as of the date
first above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  GEOFFREY G. JERVIS, not in his individual 

  capacity, but solely as trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Geoffrey G. Jervis

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  BNYM (DELAWARE), not in its individual 

  capacity, but solely as trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ Kristine K. Gullo

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Kristine K. Gullo

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Vice President
§ 111.35 If the respondent decides to challenge the alleged violation or proposed civil money penalty, what should the respondent do? ( a ) To challenge a reason to believe finding or proposed civil money penalty, the respondent must submit a written response to the Commission within forty (40) days of the Commission's reason to believe finding.
( b ) The respondent's written response must assert at least one of the following grounds for challenging the reason to believe finding or proposed civil money penalty: ( 1 ) The Commission's reason to believe finding is based on a factual error including, but not limited to, the committee was not required to file the report, or the committee timely filed the report in accordance with 11 CFR 100.19;
( 2 ) The Commission improperly calculated the civil money penalty; or
( 3 ) The respondent used best efforts to file in a timely manner in that: ( i ) The respondent was prevented from filing in a timely manner by reasonably unforeseen circumstances that were beyond the control of the respondent; and
( ii ) The respondent filed no later than 24 hours after the end of these circumstances.
( c ) Circumstances that will be considered reasonably unforeseen and beyond the control of respondent include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) A failure of Commission computers or Commission-provided software despite the respondent seeking technical assistance from Commission personnel and resources;
( 2 ) A widespread disruption of information transmissions over the Internet not caused by any failure of the Commission's or respondent's computer systems or Internet service provider; and
( 3 ) Severe weather or other disaster-related incident.
( d ) Circumstances that will not be considered reasonably unforeseen and beyond the control of respondent include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Negligence;
( 2 ) Delays caused by committee vendors or contractors;
( 3 ) Illness, inexperience, or unavailability of the treasurer or other staff;
( 4 ) Committee computer, software or Internet service provider failures;
( 5 ) A committee's failure to know filing dates; and
( 6 ) A committee's failure to use filing software properly.
( e ) Respondent's written response must detail the factual basis supporting its challenge and include supporting records.
[72 FR 14667, Mar. 29, 2007, as amended at 89 FR 218, Jan. 2, 2024]