alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 700.161 Substitute personal property—nonresidential moves. ( a ) *General.* If an item of personal property, which is used as part of a business, farm operation or nonprofit organization, is not moved but is promptly replaced with a comparable substitute item at the replacement site, the displaced person is entitled to payment of the lesser of— ( 1 ) The cost of the substitute item, including installation cost at the replacement site, minus any proceeds from the sale or trade-in of the replaced item, if any; or
( 2 ) The estimated cost of moving the replaced item, based on the lowest acceptable bid or estimate obtained by the Commission for eligible moving and related expenses, but with no allowance for storage.
( b ) *Transfer of ownership.* To be eligible for a payment under this section, the claimant shall transfer to the Commission ownership of the personal property that has not been sold or traded in.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 18.1

                  PREFERABILITY LETTER OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Trustees and
Shareholders of CenterPoint Properties Trust:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and
issued our report thereon dated March 8, 2004. Note 6 to the financial
statements describes a change in accounting principle related to certain
forms of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) backed developer notes receivable from
a cost reimbursement arrangement (resulting in an offset to construction
costs) to a real estate tax abatement arrangement (resulting in an offset to
real estate tax expense). It should be understood that the preferability of
one acceptable method of accounting over another for TIF backed developer
notes receivable has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting
literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on
management's determination that this change in accounting principle is
preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and
justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and
our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant
business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management
that such change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the adoption of
a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 20.

                                     /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Chicago Illinois
March 8, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                      0001062233
<NAME>                                           NEON
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.0
<CASH>                                      9,406,811
<SECURITIES>                              106,839,286
<RECEIVABLES>                                 133,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          139,746,372
<PP&E>                                     45,070,939
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,020,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            290,274,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      11,688,656
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      160,663
<OTHER-SE>                                 98,339,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              290,274,353
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              505,937
<CGS>                                       1,604,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               6,077,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3,732,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (6,492,442)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (564,480)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (5,927,962)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             1,335,004
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2,262,966)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.03)
        

</TABLE>
### §701. Interim trustee

(a)(1) Promptly after the order for relief under this chapter, the United States trustee shall appoint one disinterested person that is a member of the panel of private trustees established under section 586(a)(1) of title 28 or that is serving as trustee in the case immediately before the order for relief under this chapter to serve as interim trustee in the case.

(2) If none of the members of such panel is willing to serve as interim trustee in the case, then the United States trustee may serve as interim trustee in the case.

(b) The service of an interim trustee under this section terminates when a trustee elected or designated under section 702 of this title to serve as trustee in the case qualifies under section 322 of this title.

(c) An interim trustee serving under this section is a trustee in a case under this title.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2604; Pub. L. 99–554, title II, §215, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3100.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

The House amendment deletes section 701(d) of the Senate amendment. It is anticipated that the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will require the appointment of an interim trustee at the earliest practical moment in commodity broker bankruptcies, but no later than noon of the day after the date of the filing of the petition, due to the volatility of such cases.

#### senate report no. 95–989

This section requires the court to appoint an interim trustee. The appointment must be made from the panel of private trustees established and maintained by the Director of the Administrative Office under proposed 28 U.S.C. 604(e).

Subsection (a) requires the appointment of an interim trustee to be made promptly after the order for relief, unless a trustee is already serving in the case, such as before a conversion from a reorganization to a liquidation case.

Subsection (b) specifies that the appointment of an interim trustee expires when the permanent trustee is elected or designated under section 702.

Subsection (c) makes clear that an interim trustee is a trustee in a case under the bankruptcy code.

Subsection (d) provides that in a commodity broker case where speed is essential the interim trustee must be appointed by noon of the business day immediately following the order for relief.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–554 designated existing provisions as par. (1), substituted "the United States trustee shall appoint" for "the court shall appoint", "586(a)(1)" for "604(f)", "that is serving" for "that was serving", and added par. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 dependent upon the judicial district involved, see section 302(d), (e) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### Matteo Minnelli *v.*George H. Poulos et al.

*William R. Moller,*with whom was *Wesley W. Horton,*for the appellants (defendants).

*Alfonse G. Fasomo,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Argued March 5

decided March 5, 1974

The defendants’ motion to set aside the judgment of the trial court and to enter a judgment for the defendants in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is denied.
(No. 30576.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Joseph Jazorak, Plaintiff in Error.

*Opinion filed May 20,*1948

Rehearing *denied September 15, 1948.*

Joseph Jazorak, *pro se.*

George F. Barrett, Attorney General, of Springfield, (A. Fred Kendall, State’s Attorney, of Watseka, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. Chiee Justice Murphy

delivered the opinion of the court:

In 1931, plaintiff in error, Joseph Jazorak, was indicted in the circuit court of Iroquois County for robbery while armed. Upon being arraigned, he entered a plea of guilty. On August 21, 1931, he was sentenced to the penitentiary. The pertinent part of the judgment is that he be confined in the penitentiary “for an indeterminate period of not less than one year and may extend to his life, according to law. * * * And it appearing to the Court that the defendant Joseph Jazorak has this day been sentenced by this Court to imprisonment in the Illinois State Penitentiary for a term of thirty-two years for the crime of murder. It is Therefore ordered and adjudged that the imprisonment of said defendant Joseph Jazorak under the sentence *448imposed against him in the pending Case No. 2985, shall not commence until the expiration of the imprisonment under said sentence of said defendant for said crime of murder.”

Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error is that the judgment order is vague, indefinite, uncertain, inconsistent and unintelligible, in that the time for beginning the sentence in this case is not certain and definite. He bases his argument on the holding in *People*v. *White,*377 Ill. 251, and other cases. In that case the judgment order failed to define the limits of the sentences intended to run consecutively, but the judgment in the instant case is distinguishable from the judgment in the *White case.*

The statute in force in 1931, when plaintiff in error was convicted, provided that upon conviction for armed robbery a person “shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for any term of years not less than one year or for life.” SmithHurd Stat. 1931, chap. 38, par. 501.

In *People*v. *Loftus,*395 Ill. 479, several sentences were pronounced to run consecutively. It was held consecutive sentences were neither void nor erroneous. In the case at bar, the sentence for the crime of robbery was not to commence until the expiration of the imprisonment for the crime of murder, which was for thirty-two years, at which time the sentence of “one year and may extend to his life,” until discharged by due course of law would begin to run. In the *Loftus case*we held that it was not necessary that the judgment fix the day on which each successive term of imprisonment commences, but it was sufficient that every successive term begins at the expiration of the next previous one. Other cases in which consecutive sentences have been sustained are *People*v. *Wooten,*392 Ill. 542; *Johnson*v. *People,*83 Ill. 431.

From the foregoing, it is apparent that plaintiff’s contention is without merit. The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001062780
<NAME> UNITED WISCONSIN SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          31,196
<SECURITIES>                                   125,120
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,445
<PP&E>                                          10,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,109
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,052
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,805
<SALES>                                        587,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               593,848
<CGS>                                          600,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  600,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,578)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,299)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,299)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDED IN #13 (RECEIVABLES)
<F2>INCLUDED IN #17 (PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT)
<F3>INCLUDED IN #29 (CGS)
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2007100EN.01000801.xml

| 4.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 May 2007

(2007/C 100/07)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3613 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4517 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1413 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6479 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,67 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1220 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5826 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,137 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,69 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6969 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7584 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3085 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,618 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8450 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6496 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5086 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6469 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8428 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0743 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 261,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4923 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4873 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3490 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 315,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6567 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,730 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0250 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,741 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3613

JPY

Japanese yen

163,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4517

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68280

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1413

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6479

ISK

Iceland króna

86,67

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1220

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5826

CZK

Czech koruna

28,137

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,69

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6969

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7584

RON

Romanian leu

3,3085

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,618

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8450

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6496

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5086

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6469

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8428

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0743

KRW

South Korean won

1 261,86

ZAR

South African rand

9,4923

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4873

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3490

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 315,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6567

PHP

Philippine peso

64,730

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0250

THB

Thai baht

44,741

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### §2243. Powers of Board

The Board shall manage and administer, and establish policies for, the Farm Credit Administration. It—

(1) shall approve the rules and regulations for the implementation of this chapter not inconsistent with its provisions;

(2) shall provide for the examination of the condition of, and general regulation of the performance of the powers, functions, and duties vested in, each institution of the Farm Credit System;

(3) shall provide for the performance of all the powers and duties vested in the Farm Credit Administration; and

(4) may require such reports as it deems necessary from the institutions of the Farm Credit System.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.9, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 619; Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §201(1), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1689; Pub. L. 100–233, title VIII, §805(w), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1716.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–233 struck out "; civil proceedings" in section catchline.

1985—Pub. L. 99–205 substituted requirement that the Board manage and administer, and establish policies for, the Farm Credit Administration for former requirement that the Federal Farm Credit Board establish the general policy for the guidance of the Farm Credit Administration, including matters of broad and general supervisory, advisory, or policy nature; incorporated existing text in provisions designated cls. (1) to (4); substituted in cl. (2) "general regulation" for "general supervision"; and struck out last sentence which read as follows: "The Board shall function as a unit without delegating any of its functions to individual members, but may appoint committees and subcommittees for studies and reports for consideration by the Board. It shall not operate in an administrative capacity."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–205 effective thirty days after Dec. 23, 1985, see section 401 of Pub. L. 99–205, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.

#### Interim Implementation of 1985 Amendment

For provisions authorizing interim implementation by Governor of Farm Credit Administration of amendments to this section by Pub. L. 99–205, see section 402 of Pub. L. 99–205, set out as a note under section 2241 of this title.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 80

Repealing rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating

to the statutory limit on the public debt.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. GOODE, Mrs. MYRICK, and Mr. LINDER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Rules

RESOLUTION

Repealing rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating to the statutory limit on the public

debt.

1 Resolved, That rule XXIII of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is repealed.

Æ
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H.
Vance White the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 ****Dated: March 30, 2005
    By:
    /s/ H. Vance WhiteH. Vance WhiteChief Executive Officer
VII

Private Calendar No. 24

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1078

[Report No. 106–961]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed

AN ACT

For the relief of Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel

O. Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O.

7 Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey shall be

8 held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the

9 United States for permanent residence as of the date of
2

•S 1078 RH

1 the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required

2 visa fees.

3 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

4 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Mrs.

5 Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, and

6 Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey, as provided in this Act, the

7 Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to re8 duce by the appropriate number during the current fiscal

9 year the total number of immigrant visas available to na10 tives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

11 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

12 1153(a)).

Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day,

September 22), 2000.

Private Calendar No. 24

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1078

[Report No. 106–961]

AN ACT

For the relief of Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit

Paul Bassey.

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### §2279a–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §408(d), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1001

Section, Pub. L. 92–181, title VII, §7.4, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §416, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1646, related to earnings, reserves, and distributions with regard to merged banks. See section 2279a–3 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective as if repealing provisions had been enacted immediately after enactment of Pub. L. 100–233, which was approved Jan. 6, 1988, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 100–399, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 2002 of this title.