alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2005,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly  Report"),
We,  Duane S.  Jenson,  President  and Shelley  Goff,  Secretary of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Date: 8/5/2005                          /s/Duane S. Jenson
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Duane S. Jenson
                                         President and director


Date: 7/26/2005                          /s/Shelley Goff
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Shelley Goff
                                         Secretary and director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for
the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul H. Sunu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ PAUL H. SUNU Paul H. Sunu Chief Executive Officer


November 9,
2010

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, March 24, 2011, 12 p.m. to 
March 24, 2011, 2 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive 
Boulevard, 706, Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in the Federal 
Register on February 1, 2011, 76 FR 5595.
    This notice is amending the name of the committee from ``Detection 
of Cancer Biomarkers on a Universal Nanoplatform'' to ``Nanotechnology 
Imaging and Sensing Platforms for Improved Diagnosis of Cancer''. The 
meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: February 25, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4775 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.1





               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8  Nos. 333-21997,  33-86634  and 33-94872  pertaining  to the 1992 Stock
Option Plan of Lynx  Therapeutics,  Inc. of our report  dated  February 4, 1987,
with respect to the financial statements of Lynx Therapeutics,  Inc. included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

Palo Alto, California
March 25, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, New Strategies for Growing 3D Tissues, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 15, 2011, FR 2011-3373.                

The meeting was originally advertised for March 9-10, 2011. The meeting will take place on March 9, 2011 only. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated:  February 23, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4547 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# #4®1 PRELIMINARY AGENDA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT PUBLIC MEETING ON SCHEDULING ISSUES

Holiday Inn Capitol 550 C Street, SW Washington, DC 20024 Tuesday, November 15, 2005, 9:00 a.m. Purpose of Meeting: To hear the views of interested persons on how the Department will develop and implement a full compliance scheduling plan for appliance rulemaking activities. DOE is committed to meeting and catching up on all statutory requirements and requests public comment on how best to achieve it. 9:00 - 9:20 am Welcoming Remarks 9:20 - 9:45 am Introductions and Agenda Review 9:45 -10:15 am Department's Charge and Challenges 10:15 - 11:00 am Overview/Summary Stakeholder Remarks (2-3 minutes each) 11:00 - 11:15 am Break 11:15 am - 12:00 pm Recent and Forthcoming Process Improvements 12:00 - 1:00 pm Lunch 1:00 - 2:15 pm Stakeholder Feedback/Input on Process Improvements 2:15 - 2:30 pm Break 2:30 - 3:30 pm Discussion: Possible Scheduling Approaches PRELIMJNARY AGENDA 

## u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGYEFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMERPRODUCTS AND COMMERCIALAND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT PUBLIC MEETING ON SCHEDULING ISSUES Holiday Inn Capitol

550 C Street, SW Washington, DC 20024 Tuesday, November 15, 2005, 9:00 a.m. 

# #4.1

Purpose ofMeeting: To hear the views ofinterested persons onhow the Department will develop and implement a full compliance schedulingplan for appliance rulemaking activities. DOE is committedto meeting and catchingup on all statutoryrequirements and requests public comment on howbest to achieve it. 9:00 - 9:20 am Welcoming Remarks 9:20 - 9:45 am Introductions and Agenda Review 9:45 -10:15 am Department's Charge and Challenges 10:15 - 11:00 am OvervieW/Summary Stakeholder Remarks (2-3 minutes each) 11:00 - 11:15 am Break 11 :15 am- 12:00 pm Recent and Forthcoming Process Improvements 12:00 - 1:00 pm Lunch 1:00 - 2:15 pm StakeholderFeedback/Input on Process Improvements 2:15 - 2:30 pm Break 2:30 - 3:30 pm Discussion: Possible Scheduling Approaches

# #4.1

3:30 - 3:50 pm Other Issues and Comments 3:50 - 4 :00 pm Closing Remarks 4:00 pm ADJOURNMENT 3:30 - 3:50 pm 3:50 - 4:00 pm 4:00pm Other Issues and Comments Closing Remarks ADJOURNMENT 

# #4.1
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the quarter ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
D. King, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      April 14, 2009
                
                By:
                /s/
      Stephen D. KingStephen
      D. KingChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.42


 


Exhibit A


 


AMENDMENT


TO THE


CAPMARK FINANCIAL GROUP INC. SEVERANCE PAY
PLAN


(As Amended and Restated Effective March 23,
2006)


 


WHEREAS, Capmark
Financial Group Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Capmark Financial Group Inc.
Severance Pay Plan (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 6(a), the Administrative Committee of the Plan may amend the Plan from time to time and at
any time;


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to its authority under Section 7(a) and
by unanimous written consent dated December 20, 2006 the Administrative
Committee has approved this Amendment to adjust the level of benefits payable
to certain eligible employees in order to coordinate benefits between the Plan
and the Capmark Finance Inc. Affordable Housing Employee Continuation Plan:


 


NOW, THEREFORE, by action of the Administrative Committee,
the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following Appendix A at the end of the Plan, effective December 20, 2006:


 


Appendix A


 


Notwithstanding
anything in this Plan to the contrary, any Employee who continues his or her
employment with the Company pursuant to the Capmark Finance Inc. Affordable
Housing Employee Continuation Plan (the “AHEC Plan”) (i) shall have his or
her cash severance benefits payable under this Plan reduced by the amount of
base salary that such Employee is entitled to under the AHEC Plan after the
date of the Wind-down Determination (within the meaning of the AHEC Plan) or
such later date as specified in the Wind-down Determination, determined in any
manner that the Committee deems appropriate; and (ii) shall, except as
otherwise provided in this Plan, continue to accrue Service under this Plan
through the date on which his or her employment continuation under the AHEC
Plan ends.


 


*    
*     *


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Administrative Committee has caused this
Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer, this 20th  day
of December 2006.


 


	
   

  	
  CAPMARK FINANCIAL GROUP INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Linda Pickles

  
	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  Executive Vice President, HR
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________
No. 96-10205 USDC No. 4:96-CV-041-A Summary Calendar

__________________

DELBERT RAY PORTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS, AND PAROLES; VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA - HALFWAY HOUSE,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

_____________________________________________

July 18, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Delbert Ray Porter, # 0443267, appeals the dis missal of his

complaint, in which he challenged actions by the Texas Board of

Pardons and Paroles and treatment he received while confined at the

Volunteers of America

- Halfway House. Members of the Texas Board

of Pardons and Paroles who personally participate in the quasijudicial activity of parole revocation proceedings are entitled to2

absolute immunity. See McGrew v. Texas Bd. of Pardons & Paroles

,

47 F.3d 158, 160-61 (5th Cir. 1995); Boyd v. Biggers

, 31 F.3d 279,

284 (5th Cir. 1994). Porter's claims against the halfway house and

its officials do not accrue until he shows that his parole

revocation is declared invalid by a state court. H eck v. Humphrey

,

114 S.Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994). Porter has failed to exhaust state

remedies on his habeas claims. S terling v. Scott
, 57 F.3d 451, 453

(5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied

, 116 S.Ct. 715 (1996). Porter's

motion to dismiss sentence is also denied.

AFFIRMED.
## This Report replaces the original report developed by Copenhagen Economics titled “Quantification of Financial Transfers Caused by Universal Postal Union Terminal Dues**.”**The report provides a quantitative estimation of the magnitude of the financial transfers between designated postal operators currently using the terminal dues system. Copenhagen Economics revised its report with updated estimates of financial transfers between countries. The revised estimates exhibit the same patterns as those in the initial report, however, the magnitude of the transfers has changed. The revised report also contains an additional analysis of how the financial transfers are allocated among different formats and between geographical regions.
### §1715p. Insurance of advances under open-end mortgages; payment of charges; eligibility and conditions

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, in connection with any mortgage insured pursuant to any section of this chapter which covers a property upon which there is located a dwelling designed principally for residential use for not more than four families in the aggregate, the Secretary is authorized, upon such terms and conditions as he may prescribe, to insure under said section the amount of any advance for the improvement or repair of such property made to the mortgagor pursuant to an "open-end" provision in the mortgage, and to add the amount of such advance to the original principal obligation in determining the value of the mortgage for the purpose of computing the amounts of debentures and certificate of claim to which the mortgagee may be entitled: Provided, That the Secretary may require the payment of such charges, including charges in lieu of insurance premiums, as he may consider appropriate for the insurance of such "open-end" advances: Provided, further, That only advances for such improvements or repairs as substantially protect or improve the basic livability or utility of the property involved shall be eligible for insurance under this section; Provided further, That no such advance shall be insured under this section if the amount thereof plus the amount of the unpaid balance of the original principal obligation of the mortgage would exceed the amount of such original principal obligation unless the mortgagor certifies that the proceeds of such advance will be used to finance the construction of additional rooms or other enclosed space as a part of the dwelling: And provided further, That the insurance of "open-end" advances shall not be taken into account in determining the aggregate amount of principal obligations of mortgages which may be insured under this chapter.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title II, §225, as added Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title I, §126, 68 Stat. 607; amended Pub. L. 90–19, §1(a) (3), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 17.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, 48 Stat. 1246, which is classified principally to this chapter (§1701 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

1967—Pub. L. 90–19 substituted "Secretary" for "Commissioner" wherever appearing.
Exhibit 10


Exhibit 10.1




April 25, 2008







VIA FACSIMILE




Douglas C. Lane

President & CEO

Abviva, Inc.

The Tower

10940 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 600

Los Angeles, CA 90024




RE:

Resignation from Abviva Board of Directors




Dear Doug:




Please accept my resignation from the Board of Directors of Abviva, Inc. effective immediately.  My new role as partner/counsel at Anthem Venture Partners has and will continue to place restrictions on my time and I simply cannot dedicate the requisite effort to Abviva—the timing of this letter is probably not ideal but is not in any way influenced by your recent proposal.




I have enjoyed working with you and the Board for the past nearly 2 years.  I wish you and the Board all the best in your efforts to Abviva forward.




Very truly yours,




/s/ Jonathan F. Atzen




Jonathan F. Atzen
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of M.T. and H.T., children, )

___________________________________)

)

C.L., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1129

)

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM )

PROGRAM, )

)

Appellees. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 21, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Pasco County; Lynn Tepper, Judge.

C.L., pro se. 

Bernie McCabe, State Attorney, and Leslie 

M. Layne, Assistant State Attorney, 

Clearwater, for Appellee Department of 

Children and Families.

Thomasina Moore and David J. Gregors, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad 

Litem Program. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
- 2 -

LaROSE, C.J., and BADALAMENTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
# C_2010134EN.01002501.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 10 March 2010 — FOGGIA — Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA v Secretário de Estado dos Assuntos Fiscais

(Case C-126/10)

2010/C 134/37

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: FOGGIA — Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA

Appellant:

Respondent: Secretário de Estado dos Assuntos Fiscais

Respondent:

Intervening Party: Ministério Público

Intervening Party:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| (a) | What are the meaning and effect of Article 11(1)(a) of Directive 90/434/EEC (1) of 23 July 1990 and, in particular, what is the meaning of ‘valid commercial reasons’ and ‘restructuring or rationalisation of the activities’ of companies participating in operations covered by Directive 90/434/EEC ? |
| --- | --- |

(a)

What are the meaning and effect of Article 11(1)(a) of Directive 90/434/EEC (1) of 23 July 1990 and, in particular, what is the meaning of ‘valid commercial reasons’ and ‘restructuring or rationalisation of the activities’ of companies participating in operations covered by Directive 90/434/EEC ?

1

| (b) | Is the view taken by the tax authorities, that there are no serious commercial reasons for the acquiring company’s request to transfer tax losses, leading them to conclude that, from the acquiring company’s point of view, there was no apparent commercial interest in acquisition, since the acquired company had developed no activity as a holding company and had no financial holdings, and would consequently transfer only substantial losses, although the merger might represent a positive effect in terms of the cost structure of the group, compatible with that provision of Community law? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Is the view taken by the tax authorities, that there are no serious commercial reasons for the acquiring company’s request to transfer tax losses, leading them to conclude that, from the acquiring company’s point of view, there was no apparent commercial interest in acquisition, since the acquired company had developed no activity as a holding company and had no financial holdings, and would consequently transfer only substantial losses, although the merger might represent a positive effect in terms of the cost structure of the group, compatible with that provision of Community law?

---

(1)  Article 11(1)(a) of Council Directive 90/434/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States (OJ 1990 L 225, p. 1).

1

---
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1078

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel

O. Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1078 RFH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

2 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur3 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

4 1101 et seq.), Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O.

5 Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey shall be

6 held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the

7 United States for permanent residence as of the date of

8 the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required

9 visa fees.

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

11 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Mrs.

12 Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, and

13 Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey, as provided in this Act, the

14 Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to re15 duce by the appropriate number during the current fiscal

16 year the total number of immigrant visas available to na17 tives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

18 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

19 1153(a)).

Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day,

September 22), 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.