alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4313]



[[Page 10943]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, 
and Puerto Rico)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 6, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, April 6, 2011, at 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Donna Powers. 
For more information, please contact Ms. Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7977, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 
340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-4313 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# C_2007095EN.01000802.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 March 2007 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rovaniemen hallinto-oikeus (Finland)) — Länsstyrelson i Norrbottens län v Lapin liitto

(Case C-289/05) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 1685/2000 - Annex - Point 1.8 of Rule No 1 - Structural Funds - Eligibility of expenditure - Taking into account of overheads)

(2007/C 95/13)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Rovaniemen hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Länsstyrelson i Norrbottens län

Applicant:

Defendant: Lapin liitto

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rovaniemen hallinto-oikeus — Interpretation of Point 1.7 of Rule No 1 in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1685/2000 of 28 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 as regards eligibility of expenditure of operations co-financed by the Structural Funds (OJ 2000 L 193, p. 39) — Taking into account of overheads

Operative part of the judgment

Point 1.8 of Rule No 1 in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1685/2000 of 28 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 as regards eligibility of expenditure of operations co-financed by the Structural Funds, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 448/2004 of 10 March 2004, does not preclude a method of calculating overheads as eligible expenditure for the purposes of a project co-financed by the Structural Funds, on the sole ground that the method is based on a percentage or proportion, in particular, of wage costs or time worked.

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 29.10.2005.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MICHELLE LYNN CORATTO,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 456 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 22nd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
### [§2305. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1881(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4293]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 130; Pub. L. 85–861, §1(44), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1457; Pub. L. 90–268, §3, Mar. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, §2723(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1191; Pub. L. 98–525, title XII, §1213(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2591; Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1303(a)(14), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 739; Pub. L. 99–500, §101(c) [title X, §924(a), (b)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–82, 1783–153, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(c) [title X, §924(a), (b)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–82, 3341–153; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title III, §313(b), title IX, formerly title IV, §924(a), (b), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3853, 3932, 3933, renumbered title IX, Pub. L. 100–26, §3(5), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 273; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VIII, §806, Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2010; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VIII, §853(f), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1519; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §802(a)–(d), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1588, 1589; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XI, §1182(a)(5), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1771; Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §§1011–1016, title IV, §4401(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3254–3257, 3347; Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLI, §§4103(a), 4104(a), title XLII, §4202(a)(2), div. E, title LVI, §5601(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 643, 644, 653, 699; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VIII, §821(a), title X, §1074(a)(11), (b)(4)(A), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2609, 2659, 2660; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title VIII, §821, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 714; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, §825(a), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2279; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII, §818(b), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1463; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §836(c)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1864; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §§1811(e)(2), (f)(2), (g)(2), 1816(c)(1), (2), (e)(1), (f)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4170, 4173, 4182, 4185, related to planning, solicitation, evaluation, and award procedures for contracts. See, generally, section 3206 and chapter 241 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §1150b. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such amount as may be necessary to enable the Secretary to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the current and subsequent appropriations to enable the Secretary to administer the respective Acts of Congress or programs to which the aforesaid payments or loans or extensions of credit relate shall also be available for the administrative expenses of carrying out this chapter.

(Dec. 20, 1944, ch. 623, §3, 58 Stat. 837.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by Reorg. Plan. No. 2 of 1953, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Exceptions From Transfer of Functions

Functions of Corporations of Department of Agriculture, boards of directors and officers of such corporations, Advisory Board of Commodity Credit Corporation, and Farm Credit Administration or any agency, officer, or entity of, under, or subject to supervision of said Administration excepted from functions of officers, agencies, and employees transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1953, §1, effective June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
§ 158.651 Leave. ( a ) *Leave.* In alignment with salary administration under § 158.622 and work scheduling under § 158.705, the Department provides leave to a DHS-CS employee under this section and in accordance with 5 U.S.C. Chapter 63 and 5 CFR part 630, including: ( 1 ) Annual leave, as described in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 63, Subchapter I;
( 2 ) Sick leave, as described in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 63, Subchapter I;
( 3 ) Other paid leave, as described in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 63, Subchapter II;
( 4 ) Voluntary transfers of leave, as described in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 63, Subchapter III;
( 5 ) Voluntary leave bank programs, as described in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 63, Subchapter IV;
( 6 ) Family and medical leave, as described in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 63, Subchapter V; and
( 7 ) Leave transfer in disasters and emergencies, as described in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 63, Subchapter VI.
( b ) *Annual leave accrual.* A DHS-CS employee's annual leave accrual amount is determined under 5 U.S.C. 6303.
( c ) *Annual leave accumulation.* A DHS-CS employee's annual leave accumulation amount is determined under 5 U.S.C. 6304, except that the Department may apply 5 U.S.C. 6304(f)(2)(A) to DHS-CS employees receiving a salary under this part that exceeds 120 percent of the minimum annual rate of basic pay for GS-15 under the General Schedule.
( d ) *Leave credits.* The annual leave and sick leave accrued to the credit of a current Federal employee who is appointed to a qualified position under this part without a break in service of more than three calendar days is transferred to the employee's credit in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 6308.
( e ) *Annual leave balance upon leaving the DHS-CS.* When a DHS-CS employee moves to a position outside of the DHS-CS, any leave balance for the employee is addressed in accordance with 5 CFR 630.209 and 630.501.
( f ) *Leave administration.* The Department administers leave under this section as described in this section and in § 158.655, and in accordance with the relevant provisions of other laws referenced in this section and CTMS policy.
§ 83.41 What will the Assistant Secretary consider in his/her review? ( a ) AS-IA will consider all the evidence in the administrative record, including any comments and responses on the proposed finding and any the hearing transcript and recommended decision.
( b ) AS-IA will not consider comments submitted after the close of the comment period in § 83.35, the response period in § 83.36 or § 83.37, or the hearing election period in § 83.38.
### Administrative Provisions Relative to This Subchapter
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,241
<INVENTORY>                                     42,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         789,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,664,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,057,572
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           586
<OTHER-SE>                                     426,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,664,765
<SALES>                                         31,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,196
<CGS>                                           21,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,599
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,672
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,354
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,318
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
### Tax Exemption
[No. 7885.]

#### STATE EX REL. V. LEDDY.

*Error to Denver District Cowrt.*Hon. Greeley W. Whitford, Judge.

*Dismissed.*

Mr. Thos. R. Hoffmire, for plaintiff in error.

Hon. Benjamin Griffith, Attorney General, and Mr. Philip Mothersill, Assistant for the People.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.234 What types of personal conflicts of interest involving tribal officers, employees or subcontractors would have to be regulated by an Indian tribe?

The Indian tribe or tribal organization would need a tribally-approved mechanism to ensure that no officer, employee, or agent (including a subcontractor) of the Indian tribe or tribal organization reviews a trust transaction in which that person has a financial or employment interest that conflicts with that of the trust beneficiary, whether the tribe or an allottee. Interests arising from membership in, or employment by, an Indian tribe or rights to share in a tribal claim need not be regulated.
#### § 11.803 Record on appeal.

Within 20 days after a notice of appeal is filed, the clerk of court shall certify and file with the appellate division the record of the case.
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Metallurgical Evaluation of DOT-3AL-3000 Cylinder J95119                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Metallurgical Evaluation of DOT-3AL-3000 Cylinder J95119 PDF                   

# Metallurgical Evaluation of DOT-3AL-3000 Cylinder J95119

**Mar 17, 2000**

The main purpose of this technical evaluation was to determine the cause of an aluminum cylinder failure in Key Largo, FL.

**Key Words**: SLC, sustain load crack, SCUBA, DOT 3AL cylinder with gaseous oxygen, ruptured cylinder, SEM analysis, over pressurize

----

If you have any **technical questions** not addressed by this or associated documents, contact Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.
#### § 9007.4 Additional audits.

In accordance with 11 CFR 104.16(c), the Commission, pursuant to 11 CFR 111.10, may upon affirmative vote of four members conduct an audit and field investigation of any committee in any case in which the Commission finds reason to believe that a violation of a statute or regulation over which the Commission has jurisdiction has occurred or is about to occur.
#### § 1001.1 Purpose and scope.

The regulations in this part implement the provisions of the FOIA.
### §1715a. Repealed. June 3, 1939, ch. 175, §13, 53 Stat. 807

Section, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title II, §210, as added by act Feb. 3, 1938, ch. 13, §3, 52 Stat. 22, related to additional housing insurance.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Applications Prior to Repeal

Act June 3, 1939, ch. 175, §13, 53 Stat. 807, which repealed this section, also provided: "That the Administrator is authorized to insure under said section [this section] any mortgage for the insurance of which an application has been filed with him prior to the effective date of this act [June 3, 1939]."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2060

REYES GONZALEZ MARTINEZ, a/k/a Reyes Gonzalez-Martinez; LUISA 

VILLAGOMEZ-CANSINO, a/k/a Luisa via Gomez Cancino; A.G-V., a/k/a 

A.G.vG., a minor,

 Petitioners,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: April 30, 2018 Decided: May 8, 2018

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Buxton Reed Bailey, BUXTON R. BAILEY, P.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Keith I. McManus, 

Assistant Director, John B. Holt, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reyes Gonzalez Martinez and his wife and child, all natives and citizens of 

Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) 

dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s denial of Gonzalez Martinez’s 

requests for asylum and withholding of removal. We have thoroughly reviewed the 

record, including the transcript of Gonzalez Martinez’s merits hearing and all supporting 

evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any 

of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial 

evidence supports the Board’s decision, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Gonzalez Martinez (B.I.A. Aug. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# C_2007043EN.01000401.xml

| 27.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4555 — CNP Assurances/Skandia Vida)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 43/04)

On 16 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4555. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4555. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE**

Theundersigned hereby certifies that she is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as ofJanuary 19, 2012 (the “Servicing Agreement”) between the Servicer and CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC (the “Issuer”) and further that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during thetwelve months ended December 31, 2021 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and 

 
 2.
To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the twelve months ended December 31, 2021. 

Executedas of this 25th day of March, 2022. 

 
CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC, as servicerBy: 
/s/ Jacqueline M. Richert
Name: Jacqueline M. RichertTitle: Vice President and Treasurer**

**ANNEX A**

**to Certificate of Compliance**

**LIST OF SERVICER DEFAULTS**

The followingServicer Defaults, or events which with the giving of notice, the lapse of time, or both, would become Servicer Defaults known to the undersigned occurred during the year ended December 31, 2021: 

 

Nature of Default
  
Status
None.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Principal Financial OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)of theExchange Act**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| By:    | /s/ DAVID W. MONTGOMERY |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | David W. Montgomery     |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

Date: August 14, 2006

----
#### § 109.34 When may a political party committee make coordinated party expenditures?

A political party committee authorized to make coordinated party expenditures may make such expenditures in connection with the general election campaign before or after its candidate has been nominated. All pre-nomination coordinated party expenditures shall be subject to the coordinated party expenditure limitations of this subpart, whether or not the candidate on whose behalf they are made receives the party's nomination.