alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of ServicerCompliance (Item 1123)**

 

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") datedas of April 1, 2012 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Midland Loan Services,a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor, Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C6,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C6 (**WFRBS 2012-C6**)

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to thefollowing:

 

1.       Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the "ReportingPeriod") in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has beenconducted under my supervision.

 

3.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director

 

Date:March 1, 2019
#### § 700.821 Appeals relating to permits.

Any affected person may appeal permit issuance, denial of permit issuance, suspension, revocation, and terms and conditions of a permit through existing administrative appeal procedures, or through procedures which may be established by the Federal Land Manager pursuant to section 10(b) of the Act and this part.
### §8621. Acceptance and care of gifts to vessels

The Secretary of the Navy may accept and care for such gifts of silver, colors, books, or other articles of equipment or furniture as, in accordance with custom, are made to vessels of the Navy. Necessary expenses incident to the care of gifts that are accepted shall be paid from the appropriation for the maintenance and operation of vessels.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 446, §7221; renumbered §8621, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7221 | 5 U.S.C. 419. | May 20, 1908, ch. 182, 35 Stat. 171. |

The words "in the form" and "by States, municipalities, or otherwise" are omitted as surplusage. The words "the appropriation for the maintenance and operation of vessels" are substituted for the words "the appropriation 'Equipment of Vessels' " to identify by a general description, rather than by a specific appropriation title, the appropriation authorized to be used.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7221 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2007095EN.01002302.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/23

---

Action brought on 16 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-90/07)

(2007/C 95/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and J.-B. Laignelot, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste (1), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste (1), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of Directive 2004/12/EC expired on 18 August 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 47, p. 26.

1

---
#### § 9.20 Reporting.

No reporting is required with respect to payments of reasonable compensation made to regularly employed officers or employees of a person.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-137 

March 30, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4007 Payment of Premiums

29 CFR 2602 Payment of Premiums 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your recent letter and accompanying Form PBGC-1 (with attached check for * * *), respecting

* * * (the "Plan"). I understand that you have discussed the subject of your letter with * * * of my staff. 

You indicated that * * * (the "Board" ) intends to amend an existing defined contribution profit sharing plan (as was

in effect as of December 31, 1975) to become, effective January 1, 1976, a defined benefit plan. Toward this end, the

Board on November 23, 1976, adopted a defined benefit plan "document" but has not yet adopted a trust agreement; the

Board anticipates adopting a trust agreement "sometime prior to September 15, 1977." 

In view of the fact that Section 2602.3(e) of this Corporation Regulation on the Payment of Premiums (the "Premium

Regulation 41 Fed. Reg. 32740 (1976), prescribes, as the date for the payment of premiums for plans not previously

covered by Section 4021 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 30 days after the later of the plan's

"adoption" or the plan's effectiveness with respect to the accrual of future benefits, you asked for our determination of

the Plan's [*2] initial due date for the payment of premiums. 

In our view, the Plan has not yet been adopted for purposes of the Premium Regulation. Assuming, arguendo, that

the Board adopts the Plan's trust agreement on September 14, 1977 and that the Plan substantially meets the requirements

for tax qualification on that date, we would consider the Plan to be adopted on September 14, 1977 and the Plan's initial

premium payment due date will be no later than 30 days after September 14, 1977. 

 In view of the above determination, this Corporation will return to you the Plan's Form PBGC-1 filing and will

refund to you the amount of premiums paid. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### §2247. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §201(2), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1690

Section, Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.13, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 620, related to authority of Governor of the Farm Credit Administration to fix powers and duties of divisions and instrumentalities of the Administration.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective thirty days after Dec. 23, 1985, see section 401 of Pub. L. 99–205, set out as an Effective Date of 1985 Amendment note under section 2001 of this title.
### §§1221 to 1223. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–230, §24, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 466

Sections, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title II, §207(a)–(c), 42 Stat. 1465, related to rediscount powers, limitation upon indebtedness and deposit of bonds or securities, respectively.
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.110 What must a petition to the Secretary contain? A petition must contain: ( a ) The petitioner's name and contact information;
( b ) Specific facts demonstrating that the petitioner is an interested party under § 224.101, including identification of the affected interest;
( c ) Specific facts demonstrating that the petitioner exhausted Tribal remedies, if Tribal laws, regulations, or procedures permitted the petitioner to allege Tribal noncompliance with a TERA;
( d ) A description of facts supporting the petitioner's allegation of the Tribe's noncompliance with a TERA;
( e ) A description of the adverse environmental impact that the petitioner's interest has sustained or will sustain because of the Tribe's alleged noncompliance with the TERA;
( f ) A copy of any written decision the Tribe issued responding to the petitioner's claims;
( g ) If applicable, a statement that the Tribe has issued no written decision within a reasonable time related to a claim a petitioner has filed with the Tribe under applicable Tribal laws, regulations, or procedures;
( h ) If applicable, a statement and supporting documentation that the Tribe did not respond to the petitioner's request under § 224.105(a) for copies of any Tribal laws, regulations, or procedures allowing the petitioner to allege that the Tribe is not complying with a TERA; and
( i ) Any other information relevant to the petition.
[73 FR 12821, Mar. 10, 2008, as amended at 84 FR 69613, Dec. 18, 2019]
#### § 107.2 Registration and reports by host committees and municipal funds.

Each host committee and municipal fund shall register and report in accordance with 11 CFR 9008.51. The reports shall contain the information specified in 11 CFR part 104.

[68 FR 47414, Aug. 8, 2003]
### §903. Reservation of State power to control municipalities

This chapter does not limit or impair the power of a State to control, by legislation or otherwise, a municipality of or in such State in the exercise of the political or governmental powers of such municipality, including expenditures for such exercise, but—

(1) a State law prescribing a method of composition of indebtedness of such municipality may not bind any creditor that does not consent to such composition; and

(2) a judgment entered under such a law may not bind a creditor that does not consent to such composition.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2622; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §492, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

Section 903 of the House amendment represents a stylistic revision of section 903 of the Senate amendment. To the extent section 903 of the House bill would have changed present law, such section is rejected.

#### senate report no. 95–989

Section 903 is derived, with stylistic changes, from section 83 of current Chapter IX [section 403 of former title 11]. It sets forth the primary authority of a State, through its constitution, laws, and other powers, over its municipalities. The proviso in section 83, prohibiting State composition procedures for municipalities, is retained. Deletion of the provision would "permit all States to enact their own versions of Chapter IX [chapter 9 of former title 11]", Municipal Insolvency, 50 Am.Bankr.L.J. 55, 65, which would frustrate the constitutional mandate of uniform bankruptcy laws. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sec. 8.

This section provides that the municipality can consent to the court's orders in regard to use of its income or property. It is contemplated that such consent will be required by the court for the issuance of certificates of indebtedness under section 364(c). Such consent could extend to enforcement of the conditions attached to the certificates or the municipal services to be provided during the proceedings.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Par. (2). Pub. L. 98–353 struck out "to" before "that does not consent".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
{"agency":"PRC","generated":"2017-04-06 09:32:45","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"}],"value":"2017"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["PRC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["15"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["14"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["1"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2017","quarter":"Q2"}
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation !?!!!!!!!! 1200 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005-4026 

I I April 28, 2004 

Re: 1 Case Number 195240 

LTV Steel Hourly Pension Plan (the "Plan") 

Dear 71 

The Appeals Board has reviewed your appeal of PBGC's 

March 31, 2004 determination of your benefit. Your benefit is 

a $525.00 semi-annual temporary life annuity ending June 1, 

2004. As explain~d below, we are denying your appeal. 

In your April 5, 2004 letter you asked PBGC to consider your 

financial hardship. You stated your husband was a faithful 

employee for 32 years until he died on June 7, 1972. You also 

stated you are 75 years old, diabetic and cannot work. You 

depend on the semi-annual payments you receive and feel you 

deserve some type of pension. 

please see The Law below. 

Plan Provisions 

The Plan did not provide you a survivor's benefit when your 

late husband, I died in 1972. LTV started paying 

certain survivor benefits from LTV funds from 1994 through 1998, 

under a 1994 Collective Bargaining Agreement. 

Effective in 1999, the Plan was amended to pay as below to 

the widow 'of a Participant who died prior to July 31, 1974 

after completing at least 15 years of Continuous Service." See 

Enclosure 1 .' 

1 Section 4.5 (a) , "Special Payment to Certain Surviving 

Spouses." Section 4.5 (a) was adopted November 6, 2001, under a 

1999 Collective Bargaining Agreement. 
The Law 

payment Date Amount 

The law does not allow PBGC to consider your financial 

hardship when determining your guaranteed benefit. Instead, the 

law allows PBGC to pay you only benefits the Plan provides. 

Your last Plan benefit is due May 31, 2004, as in the table 

above. Also, please see Enclosure 1 page 91 and Enclosure 4. 

Therefore, the law and the Plan require stopping your benefit 

after PBGC pays your May 31, 2004 benefit. Please note, LTV 

advised you your benefit; was temporary. See Enclosures 2 - 3. 

The law also prevents PBGC from guaranteeing. a benefit 

increase effective less than a year before a plan terminates. 

Your Plan terminated March 31, 2002. Therefore, PBGC must limit 

your benefit to the $525 semiannual benefit you were receiving 

April 1, 2001. 

Decision 

Having'applied Plan provisions to the facts in your caae, 

we must deny your appeal. This letter concludes you 

administrative remedies with respect to PBGC's March 31, 2004 

determination. You may, if you wish, seek court review of 

PBGC's determination with respect to the issues you raised. We 
< 

I. $ appreciate your patience during this careful review of your 

?: appeal. .. 

u 

PI 

'D Sincerely, 

Z mrL J. Az 

William D. Ellis 

Appeals Board Member 

Enclosures: 

1) Excerpts from Plan document adopted November 6, 2001 

(8 pages) 

2) Your signed October 1995 Application showing your 

Special Payments would end in 1998 

3) Copy of LTV form letter stating the LTV-USW contract 

"extends" .your survivor's benefit through 2004, with 

detachable application form
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1064 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1064

To provide for the location of the National Museum of the United States 
                                 Army.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 18 (legislative day, May 14), 1999

 Mr. Thurmond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the location of the National Museum of the United States 
                                 Army.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Museum of the United States 
Army Site Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The Nation does not have adequate knowledge of the role 
        of the Army in the development and protection of the United 
        States.
            (2) The Army, the oldest United States military service, 
        lacks a primary museum with public exhibition space and is in 
        dire need of a permanent facility to house and display its 
        historical artifacts.
            (3) Such a museum would serve to enhance the preservation, 
        study, and interpretation of Army historical artifacts.
            (4) Many Army artifacts of historical significance and 
        national interest which are currently unavailable for public 
        display would be exhibited in such a museum.
            (5) While the Smithsonian Institution would be able to 
        assist the Army in developing programs of presentations 
        relating to the mission, values, and heritage of the Army, such 
        a museum would be a more appropriate institution for such 
        programs.
    (b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are--
            (1) to provide for a permanent site for a museum to serve 
        as the National Museum of the United States Army;
            (2) to ensure the preservation, maintenance, and 
        interpretation of the artifacts and history collected by such 
        museum;
            (3) to enhance the knowledge of the American people of the 
        role of the Army in United States history; and
            (4) to provide a facility for the public display of the 
        artifacts and history of the Army.

SEC. 3. LOCATION OF NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY.

    The Secretary of the Army shall provide for the location of the 
National Museum of the United States Army at Fort Belvoir, Virginia.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 103.1 Notification of the commission.

Each committee shall notify the Commission of the campaign depository(ies) it has designated, pursuant to 11 CFR 101.1 and 103.2.
### §3416. Jurisdiction

An action to enforce any provision of this chapter may be brought in any appropriate United States district court without regard to the amount in controversy within three years from the date on which the violation occurs or the date of discovery of such violation, whichever is later.

(Pub. L. 95–630, title XI, §1116, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3708.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of 120 days after Nov. 10, 1978, see section 2101 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 375b of this title.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1386EM

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

William L. Cooley, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: July 17, 1998

Filed: July 17, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

William L. Cooley pleaded guilty to possessing "cocaine base (crack)" with

intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and to being a felon in

possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Using the Guidelines

for crack cocaine, the district court sentenced Cooley to concurrent prison terms of 78

months plus four years supervised release. Cooley appeals his sentence, and we affirm.

Cooley contends the disparate sentencing scheme for crack as opposed to

powder cocaine violated his Fifth Amendment right to equal protection and due

process. Cooley also contends that our earlier decisions on this issue are no longer
-2-

applicable in light of the United States Sentencing Commission's April 1997 report and

the proposal of Attorney General Reno and Drug Czar McCaffrey (forwarded to

Congress by President Clinton), both of which recommend modifying the sentencing

scheme. Congress has not changed the law, however, and Cooley's challenge is

foreclosed by our decisions upholding the constitutionality of the 100-to-1 ratio, see,

e.g., United States v. Carter, 91 F.3d 1196, 1197-99 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam);

United States v. Jackson, 67 F.3d 1359, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S.

1192 (1996).

We thus affirm Cooley's sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.