alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.401

## Section §107.401: Purpose and scope

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.401 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-10 

November 8, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4007(a). Payment of Premiums. Due Dates 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your recent letter raising a question as to whether the plan administrator should pay the

premiums under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act from the assets of the pension trust or from

the employer's own assets? 

Title IV of the Act imposes the obligation to pay premiums upon the plan administrator. Insofar as Title IV is

concerned, it makes no difference whether the plan administrator pays the premiums from plan funds or from employer

funds. 

Henry Rose 

Acting General Counsel
FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/7/2015 11:57:30 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 105 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 105

  To deauthorize certain portions of the project for navigation, Bass 
                             Harbor, Maine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

Ms. Snowe (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To deauthorize certain portions of the project for navigation, Bass 
                             Harbor, Maine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASS HARBOR, MAINE.

    (a) Deauthorization.--The portions of the project for navigation, 
Bass Harbor, Maine, authorized on May 7, 1962, under section 107 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), that are described in 
subsection (b) are not authorized after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (b) Description.--The portions of the project referred to in 
subsection (a) are described as follows:
            (1) Beginning at a bend in the project, N149040.00, 
        E538505.00, thence running easterly about 50.00 feet along the 
        northern limit of the project to a point N149061.55, 
        E538550.11, thence running southerly about 642.08 feet to a 
        point, N148477.64, E538817.18, thence running southwesterly 
        about 156.27 feet to a point on the westerly limit of the 
        project, N148348.50, E538737.02, thence running northerly about 
        149.00 feet along the westerly limit of the project to a bend 
        in the project, N148489.22, E538768.09, thence running 
        northwesterly about 610.39 feet along the westerly limit of the 
        project to the point of origin.
            (2) Beginning at a point on the westerly limit of the 
        project, N148118.55, E538689.05, thence running southeasterly 
        about 91.92 feet to a point, N148041.43, E538739.07, thence 
        running southerly about 65.00 feet to a point, N147977.86, 
        E538725.51, thence running southwesterly about 91.92 feet to a 
        point on the westerly limit of the project, N147927.84, 
        E538648.39, thence running northerly about 195.00 feet along 
        the westerly limit of the project to the point of origin.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 559.3 When must a tribe submit a copy of a newly issued or renewed facility license to the Chair?

A tribe must submit to the Chair a copy of each newly issued or renewed facility license within 30 days of issuance.
| (logo) Prudential | Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.

**Prudential Mortgage Capital Company**2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 Dallas, TX 75201 Tel 877 937-4500 |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 

Commercial Mortgage Servicing

MAC 01086-120

550 South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

Reference: WFRBS 2012-C7 Asset Manager

 

 

RE: RBS 2012 C7

Period: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the " Reporting Period")

 

 

Annual Compliance Statement

 

I, Timothy E. Steward, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of June 1, 2012 pertaining to the above-referenced certificates, that:

 

(i) a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the period noted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement during the reporting period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reporting period.

 

 

Effective as of 2/24/2016

 

/s/ Timothy E. Steward

Timothy E. Steward

President and Managing Director

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
### §2076a. Liens on stock

Except with regard to stock or participation certificates held by other Farm Credit System institutions, each production credit association shall have a first lien on stock and participation certificates the association issues, on allocated surplus, and on investments in equity reserve, for any indebtedness of the holder of the capital investments and, in the case of equity reserves, for charges for association losses in excess of reserves and surpluses.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title II, §2.6, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XVIII, §1833(2), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3832.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2.6 of Pub. L. 92–181 was renumbered section 2.7 and is classified to section 2077 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 7, 1988, see section 1861(d) of Pub. L. 101–624, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 2001 of Title 7, Agriculture.
§ 700.3 Assurances with respect to acquisition and displacement. The Commission will not approve any programs or projects which may result in the acquisition of habitations and/or improvements, or in the displacement of any person, until such time as written assurances are submitted to the Commission that such projects or programs are in accordance with the Act. It will— ( a ) Assure that, within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, adequate, decent, safe and sanitary replacement dwellings (defined at § 700.55) will be available to all certified eligible heads of households.
( b ) Carry out relocation services in a manner that will promote maximum quality in housing.
( c ) Inform affected persons of their rights under the policies and procedures set forth under the regulations in this part.
§ 9007.3 Extensions of time. ( a ) It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time under 11 CFR part 9007 will not be routinely granted.
( b ) Whenever a candidate has a right or is required to take action within a period of time prescribed by 11 CFR part 9007 or by notice given thereunder, the candidate may apply in writing to the Commission for an extension of time in which to exercise such right or take such action. The candidate shall demonstrate in the application for extension that good cause exists for his or her request.
( c ) An application for extension of time shall be made at least 7 calendar days prior to the expiration of the time period for which the extension is sought. The Commission may, upon a showing of good cause, grant an extension of time to a candidate who has applied for such extension in a timely manner. The length of time of any extension granted hereunder shall be decided by the Commission and may be less than the amount of time sought by the candidate in his or her application. If a candidate seeks an extension of any 60-day response period under 11 CFR part 9007, the Commission may grant no more than one extension to that candidate, which extension shall not exceed 15 days.
( d ) If a candidate fails to seek an extension of time, exercise a right or take a required action prior to the expiration of a time period prescribed by 11 CFR part 9007, the Commission may, on the candidate's showing of excusable neglect: ( 1 ) Permit such candidate to exercise his or her right(s), or take such required action(s) after the expiration of the prescribed time period; and
( 2 ) Take into consideration any information obtained in connection with the exercise of any such right or taking of any such action before making decisions or determinations under 11 CFR part 9007.
[56 FR 35924, July 29, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 31880, June 16, 1995]
# National Archives andRecords Administration Office oftheFederal Register
December 28, 2009 FAA 800 Independence Avenue, SW Room 915 J, RehYlllations Division Washington, DC 20591 ATTN: Nancy Molitor, FAA Liaison Officer fOf the Federal Register De.'!fMs. Molitor: The material listed in the attachment is ap.proved for incorporation by reference in 14 CFR Pm1 39. This appnivalls contingent upon the final IUle containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by our staffs. The "'pproval to incOlvorate by reference this publication(s) is effective on the effective date ofyanr final rule.1fyoll wish [0 enforce some other edition of the publication(s) approved, you must: Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register, and amend the Code of Federa\ Regulations; wjd 2. Ensure (hat acopy ortlla! edition is on file atthe 

### Office ofthe Federal Register; and


# i;,L...-KAy~ L1SLEY J Directo?;fthe Federal Register Federal Register Attomey:

# ;lIb Attachment

us. mail address: 8601 AdelpJli ['Gad, College Park, MG 2074[1-;]001

Office ilXiltion: 800 North Cilpitol Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20002-4244 Federa!Registerweb sill'S: http://www,archives.gov/federal-registernlldbllp:j.l www.gpoaccess.gov!nilr'l!ucorporatioll by Reference Dockcl }I/o_ F,lA-1007-0J 86: DirecTOrateIdenri/ii..'rl(}Ol-NM-226-AD: Amendmcm 39-16156: AD 1009-26-1 7
Bosing Service Bulletin DG10- Revision 7 03/03/2009 53-09 Boeing Service Bulletin OG10- Revision 6 03/0312009 53-111 Docker No. FAA-1(}09-04 J1. Directorate Idemilier 1009-NM-022-AD: Amcntlmcn/ 3Y-J6154, AD 100Y-26-15

EM8RAER Service Bulletin 170-54- 0007 12/21/2007 EMBRAER Service Bulletin 190·54- 0008 12/21/2007 Docket No. FAA-200Y-0637: Direclol"Oh' Idcl7rUier 100fl-NM-l r!3-A[): Amentlmcm 39-16153. AD l009-26-i 4

EADS CASA Service Bulletin 8B-235- Revision 2 57·20 03/30/2007 Docker A'(I.FAA-2()()9-06N6; Directorate Identifier 2009-N/ll-044-AD: Amendment 39-/6/55, AD 2()09-26- 16

06/18/2009 Service Bulletin M011- Revision 1 28-126 Docket No. FAA-200Y-i 2i0: Directorate iD 200Y-l'lM-165-AD: Amcndmem 39-161 4N: AD 1008-1 (J-09R/ Boeing

OS/2009 737- Revision M.::y 100/200/200C/300/400/ 2009 500 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), D6·38278-CMR Docket f·io. FAA -2009- 11 1/, DircClOral(! Identifiel' 2009-lv'M- 

### i2/-AD: Amendmenf 39-J6J49; AD 2()()Y-26- 

### i (j Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Airbus A380 Mandatory SelVice Bulletin A380-57-8016 05111/2009

Printer! /2/28/2009 Page I ufl
#### § 9002.7 Minor party.

*Minor party* means a political party whose candidate for the office of President in the preceding Presidential election received, as a candidate of such party, 5 percent or more, but less than 25 percent, of the total number of popular votes received by all candidates for such office. For the purposes of 11 CFR 9002.7, *candidate* means with respect to any preceding Presidential election, an individual who received popular votes for the office of President in such election.
### §328. Withdrawals from membership

Any State bank or trust company desiring to withdraw from membership in a Federal Reserve bank may do so, after six months' written notice shall have been filed with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, upon the surrender and cancellation of all of its holdings of capital stock in the Federal reserve bank: Provided, That the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in its discretion and subject to such conditions as it may prescribe, may waive such six months' notice in individual cases and may permit any such State bank or trust company to withdraw from membership in a Federal reserve bank prior to the expiration of six months from the date of the written notice of its intention to withdraw: Provided, however, That no Federal reserve bank shall, except under express authority of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, cancel within the same calendar year more than 25 per centum of its capital stock for the purpose of effecting voluntary withdrawals during that year. All such applications shall be dealt with in the order in which they are filed with the board. Whenever a member bank shall surrender its stock holdings in a Federal reserve bank, or shall be ordered to do so by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, under authority of law, all of its rights and privileges as a member bank shall thereupon cease and determine, and after due provision has been made for any indebtedness due or to become due to the Federal reserve bank it shall be entitled to a refund of its cash-paid subscription with interest at the rate of one-half of 1 per centum per month from date of last dividend, if earned, the amount refunded in no event to exceed the book value of the stock at that time, and shall likewise be entitled to repayment of deposits and of any other balance due from the Federal reserve bank.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §9 (par.), as added June 21, 1917, ch. 32, §3, 40 Stat. 233; amended Apr. 17, 1930, ch. 175, 46 Stat. 170; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the tenth par. of section 9 of act Dec. 23, 1913, as amended. The tenth par. constituted the eighth par. of section 9 in 1917 (40 Stat. 232), became the ninth par. in 1927 (44 Stat. 1229), and became the tenth par. in 1950 (64 Stat. 458). For further details, see Codification note set out under section 321 of this title.

#### Amendments

1930—Act Apr. 17, 1930, amended part of section preceding second proviso.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
# C_2006294EN.01005701.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/57

---

Action brought on 29 September 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Court of Justice

(Case T-272/06)

(2006/C 294/116)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor;

| — | order the Court of Justice to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Court of Justice to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of its application, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice of 20 July 2006, rejecting its bid filed in response to the open Call for Tenders AM CJ 13/04 for the maintenance, development and support of computer applications (OJ 2005/S 127-125162 & 2005/S 171-169521) and awarding the same Call for Tender to another bidder.

The applicant claims that the contested decision was taken in violation of the Financial Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 248, 16/09/02, p. 1), its Implementing Rules and Directive 2004/18/EC, through an alleged misinterpretation of the selection criteria, violation of the principles of transparency and equal treatment of the participants.

Moreover, the applicant submits that the contracting authority's decision contains evident errors of assessment in the framework of the evaluation of its offer, exceeding, thus, the discretion that European Institutions dispose in procurement procedures.

---
Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Nebraska; 

Regional Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Best Available 

Retrofit Technology Determination

Appendices

June 15, 2012

Final Action

 EPA TSD Appendix B – revised

 EPA TSD Appendix C – revised 

 EPA Appendix D: Gerald Gentleman Station SCR BART cost analysis spreadsheet

 EPA Appendix E: EPA’s evaluation of cost of SCR controls at NPPD Gerald Gentlemen 

Station, Units 1 and 2

 EPA Appendix F: Cost comparison of SCR limits

 EPA Appendix G: Responses to comments and revisions to EPA’s evaluation of cost of FGD 

controls at NPPD Gerald Gentlemen Station, Units 1 and 2

Note that in the proposed action, the following appendices were included. We list them here for 

the reader’s reference:

Proposed Action: 77 FR 12770 (March 2, 2012)

 EPA’s TSD for NE Regional Haze

 EPA TSD Appendix A: EPA’s evaluation of cost of FGD controls at NPPD Gerald 

Gentlemen Station, Units 1 and 2 

 EPA TSD Appendix B: Gerald Gentleman Station NOx and SO2 emission rates, 2001-2010

 EPA TSD Appendix C: Gerald Gentleman Station FGD BART cost analysis spreadsheet
##### 



EXECUTION COPY
 Exhibit 10.1
  
 Attn:
    
    Mr. David B. Nussbaum, Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Preston Vice, Chief Financial Officer
    Framework




---



##### 



Approval Of A Sale provided however
 Term provided however
 Stockholder Capacity
 Governing Law




---



##### 



Consent to Jurisdiction
 Execution




---



##### 



ABRY Mezzanine Partners, L.P.By:Its: Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P.By:Its: Sandler Capital Partners V FTE, L.P.By:Its: Sandler Capital Partners V Germany, L.P.By:Its: ABACUS Fund Partners, LPBy:Its: ABACUS Fund, Ltd.By:Its:




---



##### 



Penton Media, Inc.
 By:Its:




---



##### 



ANNEX A
 PROCEEDS AVAILABLE TO THE SERIES CSTOCKHOLDERS AND THE COMMONSTOCKHOLDERS(THE PROCEEDS)
    
    COMMON STOCK AMOUNTUp to $135,000,000.
    
    The greater of (i) $14,000,000
and (ii) 12.75% of the Proceeds.$135,000,000$145,000,000.
    
    $17,212,500 plus 15% of the
incremental value of the Proceeds
above $135,000,000.$145,000,000$185,000,000.
    
    $18,712,500 plus 25% of the
incremental value of the Proceeds
above $145,000,000.Above $185,000,000.
    
    $28,712,500 plus 20% of the
incremental value of the Proceeds
above $185,000,000.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1019 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 385
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1019

                For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 1999

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            November 4, 1999

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
                For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMIGRATION AND 
              NATIONALITY ACT.

    (a) In General.--In the administration of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, Regine Beatie Edwards shall be classified as a child 
within the meaning of section 101(b)(1)(E) of such Act, upon approval 
of a petition filed on her behalf by Stan Edwards, a citizen of the 
United States, pursuant to section 204 of such Act.
    (b) Limitation.--No natural parent, brother, or sister, if any, of 
Regine Beatie Edwards shall, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 385

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1019

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 4, 1999

                       Reported without amendment`