alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Systems Biology Grant Applications.
    Date: March 25, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Arthur L. Zachary, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 
Room 3AN-12, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-2886. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f554e4c474e5d564e6f414648425c0141464701484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3842595b50594a41597856515f554b16565150165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 25, 2011.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4782 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alliance
BioEnergy Plus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Form 10-K") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: April 14, 2015

/s/ Daniel de
      LiegeDaniel de LiegeChief Executive Officer,
      President, Secretaryand Chief Financial Officer (Principal
      Financialand Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ALLIANCE
BIOENERGY PLUS, INC. and will be retained by ALLIANCE BIOENERGY PLUS, INC. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 932 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 932

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat a portion of 
 welfare benefits which are contingent on employment as earned income 
   for purposes of the earned income credit, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat a portion of 
 welfare benefits which are contingent on employment as earned income 
   for purposes of the earned income credit, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Work for Real Wages Act''.

SEC. 2. PORTION OF WELFARE BENEFITS CONTINGENT ON EMPLOYMENT TREATED AS 
              EARNED INCOME FOR EARNED INCOME CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 32(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining earned income) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) If--
                            ``(i) as a condition of receiving any 
                        payment or other amount under a State program 
                        funded under part A of title IV of the Social 
                        Security Act, the eligible individual is 
                        required to perform services for any person or 
                        any governmental unit (or agency or 
                        instrumentality thereof), and
                            ``(ii) such individual receives no 
                        compensation (other than such payment or other 
                        amount) for performing such services,
                then the term `earned income' includes an amount equal 
                to the product of the number of hours during the 
                taxable year that such services are performed and the 
                minimum wage rate applicable to the individual under 
                section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 
                (determined without regard to section 3(m) of such 
                Act). The preceding sentence shall also apply for 
                purposes of sections 21 and 129 (relating to dependent 
                care credit and assistance).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 10, 2018

No. 04-18-00227-CR & 04-18-00230-CR

Michael Casey FORAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 11, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 518258 & 2016CR10025

Honorable Tommy Stolhandske, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 Pursuant to this court’s prior consolidation order, appellant’s brief was due July 9, 

2018. On the due date, appellant filed a motion for extension of time, asking for an additional 

thirty days in which to file his brief. After review, we GRANT the motion and ORDER

appellant to file his brief in this court on or before August 8, 2018.

 We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG AG, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-112080, 333-109589, 333-109408, 333-62890, 333-39171,
333-87394, 333-114168 and 333-114239) and the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-106196, 333-100793, 333-63804, 333-59163, 333-59157, 333-21997,
33-86634 and 33-94872) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan and the 1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. and the related
prospectuses, of our report dated February 26, 2004, with respect to the
financial statements of AXARON Bioscience AG, Heidelberg for the year ended
December 31, 2003, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Lynx
Therapeutics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Mannheim, Germany
June 28, 2004

Ernst & Young AG
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft

/s/ Th.Muller                 /s/ K. Berger
Th.Muller                     K. Berger
Wirtschaftsprufer             Wirtschaftsprufer
# C_2007069EN.01000802.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/8

---

Action brought on 30 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-34/07)

(2007/C 69/17)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2003/109/EC expired on 23 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 16, 2004, p. 44.

1

---
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Computer SoftwareEducational ResourcesEducational TechnologyElementary Secondary EducationGraphing CalculatorsMathematics Education

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### Robinson *v.*Bruce.

[No. 12,146.

Filed October 16, 1925.]

From Hamilton Circuit Court; *Fred E. Hines,*Judge.

Action between Charles Robinson and Casselman L. Bruce. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals. *Affirmed. By*the court in banc.

*Christian &. Waite,*for appellant

*Willkie & Willkie,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.
Order entered October 20, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 01235 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF A .N., A CHILD On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199 - 30144 - 2014



### O RDER Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34

. 5(c), we ORDER Collin County District Clerk Andrea Stroh Thompson to file, no later than October 30, 2015, either (1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the September 24, 2015 order or judgment terminating Father’s parental rights or (2) written verification that no judgment or order terminating Father’s parental rights has been signed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 34.5(c).

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
# C_2006224EN.01002902.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/29

---

Action brought on 26 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-327/06)

(2006/C 224/55)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and L. Pignataro, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC (1) establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC (1) establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the directive expired on 23 March 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 29.

1

---
§ 1.14 Specific exemptions. ( a ) No individual, under the provisions of these regulations, shall be entitled to access to materials compiled in its systems of records identified as FEC audits and investigations (FEC 2) or FEC compliance actions (FEC 3). These exempted systems relate to the Commission's power to exercise exclusive civil jurisdiction over the enforcement of the Act under 52 U.S.C. 30107(a)(6) and (e); and to defend itself in actions filed against it under 52 U.S.C. 30107(a)(6). Further the Commission has a duty to investigate violations of the Act under 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(2); to conduct audits and investigations pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30111(b), 26 U.S.C. 9007 and 9038; and to refer apparent violations of the Act to the Attorney General or other law enforcement authorities under 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(5) and 30107(a)(9). Information contained in FEC systems 2 and 3 contain the working papers of the Commission staff and form the basis for either civil and/or criminal proceedings pursuant to the exercise of the powers and duties of the Commission. These materials must be protected until such time as they are subject to public access under the provision of 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(B) or 5 U.S.C. 552, or other relevant statutes.
( b ) ( 1 ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), records contained in FEC 12, Office of Inspector General Investigative Files, are exempt from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, except subsections (b), (c) (1) and (2), (e)(4) (A) through (F), (e) (6), (7), (9), (10), and (11) and (f) , and the corresponding provisions of 11 CFR part 1, to the extent this system of records relates in any way to the enforcement of criminal laws.
( 2 ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), FEC 12, Office of Inspector General Investigative Files, is exempt from 552a (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f), and the corresponding provisions of 11 CFR part 1, to the extent the system of records consists of investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, except for material that falls within the exemption included in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to the extent that application of the subsection would deny any individual any right, privilege or benefit to which he or she would otherwise be entitled to receive.
[41 FR 43064, Sept. 29, 1976, as amended at 45 FR 21209, Apr. 1, 1980; 60 FR 4073, Jan. 20, 1995; 75 FR 31, Jan. 4, 2010; 79 FR 77843, Dec. 29, 2014]
EX-34.14
(logo) Grant Thornton

Audit * Tax * Advisory

Grant Thornton LLP
201 South College Street
Suite 2500
Charlotte, NC 28244

T 704.632.3500

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors

Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria ("Management's Report"), that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2013, except for those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A)
within Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those
transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust, senior trust or
operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the "Platform").
Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the
Platform based on our examination.


Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.


1


(page)


In our opinion, management's assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.
complied with the applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and
Exhibit B as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


Charlotte, North Carolina

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

March 1, 2014


2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 95

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that American 
                      families deserve tax relief.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1999

    Mr. Pitts (for himself, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Sununu, Mr. 
     Pickering, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Barr of Georgia, Mr. 
Hostettler, Mr. Paul, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Royce, Mr. Aderholt, 
 Mr. Souder, Ms. Granger, and Mr. Cunningham) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that American 
                      families deserve tax relief.

Whereas American families currently pay too much of their hard-earned money in 
        taxes;
Whereas every American will work for at least 120 days in 1999 to pay his or her 
        share of taxes;
Whereas Americans should be allowed to keep more of their money to invest in 
        their children's futures, purchase homes, or start businesses; and
Whereas the American family will be strengthened by providing tax relief: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges that the Congress 
and the President work together to enact permanent tax relief for our 
Nation's families.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006326EN.01008701.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/87

---

Action brought on 29 November 2006 — Bordini v Commission

(Case F-134/06)

(2006/C 326/175)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Giovanni Bordini (Dover, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Levi, C. Ronzi and I. Perego, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

| — | annul the decision of 25 January 2006 by which the appointing authority refused to recognise that the applicant was resident in the United Kingdom and, in consequence, refused to apply the weighting for the United Kingdom to his pension; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 25 January 2006 by which the appointing authority refused to recognise that the applicant was resident in the United Kingdom and, in consequence, refused to apply the weighting for the United Kingdom to his pension;

| — | order the defendant to pay interest — on the basis of a rate two points higher than the rate fixed by the European Central Bank, and applicable during the period concerned, for major refinancing operations — on the amounts payable by virtue of retroactive application of the United Kingdom weighting to the applicant's pension with effect from 1 April 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay interest — on the basis of a rate two points higher than the rate fixed by the European Central Bank, and applicable during the period concerned, for major refinancing operations — on the amounts payable by virtue of retroactive application of the United Kingdom weighting to the applicant's pension with effect from 1 April 2004;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his application, the applicant argues, first, that the contested decision is contrary to the principle of the obligation to state reasons, in so far as it is framed in terms so vague that it is not possible to understand the underlying reasoning.

The applicant additionally invokes infringement of Article 82 of the former Staff Regulations and Article 20 of Annex XIII to the new Staff Regulations; a manifest error of assessment of the facts giving rise to an error in law; breach of the principle of proportionality; and failure to respect the right to privacy.

Lastly, the applicant submits that the Commission was in breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials and of the principle of sound administration.

---