alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Charles D. Johnson" <cjohnson@aluminum.org>

To: David Putney/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/22/2011 11:01 AM

Subject: RE: PAL capacities, legal names, and COS meeting

David, I don’t have a list of legal names of corporate owners for these f acilities, but I looked up the entities that

might be separate from the list of producers that I work with. I went through the Primary smelter facilities in the

US, looking for the criteria as I understood it that you are working with, and came up with the following:

 Lake Charles Carbon

 Ormet

 Noranda

 Columbia Falls

 Intalco

 Alcoa (5 facilities)

 Reynolds Metals Co.

 Alumax

 Century Aluminum

 Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc.

This is purely informational, and I hope it can help.

Regarding production capacity, Noranda should be updated to reflect a permitted annual capacity of 325,000

tons/year.

Finally, I spoke to Mike Palazzolo about the COS meeting with EPA staff. It looks like, due to anti

- trust issues

surrounding the discussion of Coke pricing and availability, we will have Mike meet with you to discuss this issue

unilaterally. I might attend, but no other companies will do so. He is unavailable for a meeting until at least the

second week of May. In the meantime, we agreed to poll our members directly to answer some of the substantive

work practice questions you posed for COS. We’ll get that to you ASAP, so that your team can move forward on

the issue. I think we can have you something by the same time as the original early May timing we discussed for a

meeting.

Regards,

Chuck JohnsonFrom: Putney.David@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Putney.David@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 9:17 AM

To: Charles D. Johnson

Subject: PAL capacities, legal names, and COS meeting

Chuck,

Just a follow up to our telephone conversation yesterday. I'm hoping to get an email f rom you listing the

permitted production capacities of the PAL facilities and the legal names of their corporate owners. I just

got approval of the ICR from management here and would like to send those letters out ASAP

- but I want

to make sure I get the n ames correct on the ICR cover letters.

Also, I was hoping to get a date for a meeting with industry representative to discuss the COS issue.

Thanks again for all your assistance and coordination efforts on this project,

David Putney, Environmental En gineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243

- 02

Ph: (919) 541

- 2016 Fax: (919) 541

- 3207

Email: putney.david@epa.gov
Form of Grant Agreement



 Exhibit 10.14(b) 
 

 
 ESMARK INCORPORATED 
 2008 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN - MIP 
 NAME 
 TITLE 
 MIP INCENTIVE PAYOUT AS A % OF SALARY 
  

					
	 Threshold Bonus %
 (80% of Goals)
	 	 Target Bonus %
 (100% of Goals)
	 	 Maximum Bonus %
 (120% of Goals)

	 20%
	 	40%	 	80%

 Company Performance Objective 
 MIP Trigger: Net Income Positive 
 and 
 Esmark Incorporated Performance Objective: EBITDA of $129 Million 
 Shareholder Performance Objective 
 Meet or Exceed an Increase in Shareholder Value of 15% (Starting point as
of 12/31/07) 







 NAME 
 TITLE 
 Individual Performance Objectives 
  

	
	1.
	
	2.
	
	3.
	
	5.
	
	6.

 Board of Director Approval: April 29, 2008 
  

 2
# C_2006310EN.01003401.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/34

---

(2006/C 310/70)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 294, 2.12.2006

OJ C 294, 2.12.2006

Past publications

OJ C 281, 18.11.2006

OJ C 261, 28.10.2006

OJ C 249, 14.10.2006

OJ C 237, 30.9.2006

OJ C 224, 16.9.2006

OJ C 212, 2.9.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2007056EN.01000802.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Brive-la-Gaillarde (France)) — Estager SA v Receveur principal de la recette des douanes de Brive

(Case C-359/05) (1)

1

(Economic and monetary policy - Regulations (EC) No 1103/97 and No 974/98 - Introduction of the euro - Conversion between the euro and national currency units - Legislation of a Member State adjusting the value in euros of certain sums expressed in national currency in the legislative texts of that State)

(2007/C 56/13)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de grande instance de Brive-la-Gaillarde (France)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Estager SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Receveur principal de la Recette des Douanes de Brive

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de grande instance de Brive-La-Gaillarde — Interpretation of Articles 3 and 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1103/97 of 17 June 1997 on certain provisions relating to the introduction of the euro (OJ 1997 L 162, p. 1) and of Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (OJ 1998 L 139, p. 1) — National legislation rounding off the amount of tax on the supplementary budget for agricultural social benefits (BAPSA) following its conversion into euros

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EC) No 1103/97 of 17 June 1997 on certain provisions relating to the introduction of the euro and Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, on effecting the conversion into euros of an amount of a tax on flour, meal and groats of common wheat supplied or used for human consumption, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, raised it to an amount higher than that which would have resulted from application of the rules of conversion provided for in those regulations, unless such an increase meets the requirements of legal certainty and transparency guaranteed by those regulations, which presupposes that the legislative texts at issue make it possible to distinguish clearly the decision of the authorities of a Member State to increase that amount from the operation of conversion of that amount into euros. It is for the referring court to determine whether that is so in the proceedings before it.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 10.12.2005.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.3**
**CERTIFICATION (1)**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted), Kevin P. Corcoran, Chief Executive Officer of LynxTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), and Kathy A. San Roman, Vice President,Human Resources & Administration and Acting Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his and her knowledge:
1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period endedDecember 31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit32.3 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and the results ofoperations of the Company.
**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of October22, 2004.    /s/ Kevin P. Corcoran  Kevin P. Corcoran Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Kathy A. San Roman  Kathy A. San Roman Vice President, Human Resources & Administration andActing Chief Financial Officer
(1) This certification “accompanies” the Annual Report on Form 10-K towhich it relates, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of2002, and is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. under the Securities Act or the ExchangeAct (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report onForm 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.
-  Home 
-  Transporting Infectious Substances 

# In This Section

                      -  Transporting Infectious Substances Overview 
                      -  Infectious Substance Special Permits 
                      -  COVID-19 Information 

# Summary of Key Points and Significant Changes (August 2019)

cat-waste-planning-guidance-final-2019-08-key-points.pdf (1.04 MB)

Managing Solid Waste Contaminated with a Category A Infectious Substance (August 2019): Summary of Key Points and Significant Changes

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
-  Home 
-  171 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 171.26

## Section §171.26: Additional requirements for the use of the IAEA Regulations

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 171.26 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001062506
<NAME>                        Atlantica, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,848
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,458
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,306)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,224)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.00)



</TABLE>
----

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |
| 001-10315                | 63-0860407 |
| (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|                     |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

|         |                                                                                                                                            |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | Audited financial statements of Reliant Hospital Partners, LLC (“Reliant”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 |

|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | Unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 to include the Company's acquisition of EHHI Holdings, Inc. (“EHHI”) and its Encompass Home Health and Hospice business (“Encompass”) |

----

|     |          |
|-----|----------|
| (d) | Exhibits |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   |   |   |
| By:    | /S/   DOUGLAS E. COLTHARP |
|   | Name: | Douglas E. Coltharp |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |
| Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit |
| 99.1           | Audited consolidated balance sheet of Reliant as of December 31, 2014 and the related audited consolidated statements of operations, members' deficit, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2014, together with the notes thereto and the auditor's report thereon. |
| 99.2           | Unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations of HealthSouth for the year ended December 31, 2014. |
§ 9033.4 Matching payment eligibility threshold requirements. ( a ) The Commission will examine the submission made under 11 CFR 9033.1 and 9033.2 and either— ( 1 ) Make a determination that the candidate has satisfied the minimum contribution threshold requirements under 11 CFR 9033.2(c); or
( 2 ) Make an initial determination that the candidate has failed to satisfy the matching payment threshold requirements. The Commission will notify the candidate of its initial determination in accordance with the procedures outlined in 11 CFR 9033.10(b). The candidate may, within 30 calendar days after service of the Commission's notice, satisfy the threshold requirements or submit in accordance with 11 CFR 9033.10(b) written legal or factual materials to demonstrate that he or she has satisfied those requirements. A final determination by the Commission that the candidate has failed to satisfy threshold requirements will be made in accordance with the procedures outlined in 11 CFR 9033.10(c).
( b ) The Commission will make its examination and determination under this section as soon as practicable. During the Presidential election year, the Commission will generally complete its review and make its determination within 15 business days.
[56 FR 35930, July 29, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 31881, June 16, 1995]
# C_2007060EN.01000801.xml

| 15.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/8 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------ |

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — ref: GP/D/ReferNet/002/06

Grant award notice

ReferNet — European Network of Reference and Expertise in VET

(2007/C 60/06)

1.   Contracting authority

| Cedefop |
| ------------------------------------------------------ |
| European Centre for Development of Vocational Training |
| attn: Mr G. Paraskevaidis |
| 123 Europe Street, PO Box 22427 |
| GR-55102 Thessaloniki |

| Contact person: |
| --------------------------------------- |
| Ms Clotilde Assumel-Lurdin |
| Tel. (30-2310) 490 287 |
| Fax (30-2310) 490 028 |
| E-mail: c4t-services@cedefop.europa.eu. |

Previous publication: OJ C 211 of 2.9.2006, p. 12.

2.   Grant awards

| Beneficiary name | Address | Grant Agreement reference | Date of Signature | Duration of Grant Agreement | Grant amount
(EUR) |
| -------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------------------------- | ------------------- |
| DGERT | Praça de Londres n.o 2-7 Piso P-1049-056 Lisboa | Praça de Londres n.o 2-7 Piso | P-1049-056 Lisboa | 2006-0128 | 13.12.2006 |
| Praça de Londres n.o 2-7 Piso | | | | | |
| P-1049-056 Lisboa | | | | | |
| Ministry of Education, Youth and Employment (Consortium) | Great Siege RD MT-CMR02 Floriana | Great Siege RD | MT-CMR02 Floriana | 2006-0127 | 14.12.2006 |
| Great Siege RD | | | | | |
| MT-CMR02 Floriana | | | | | |
| MENNT EDUCATE — Iceland | Grensasvegur 16a IS-108 Reykjavik | Grensasvegur 16a | IS-108 Reykjavik | 2006-0126 | 12.12.2006 |
| Grensasvegur 16a | | | | | |
| IS-108 Reykjavik | | | | | |
| SWEDISH NATIONAL AGENCY FOR EDUCATION
SKOLVERKET | S-10620 Stockholm | 2006-0125 | 15.12.2006 | 12 months | 29 000 |
| CINOP Expertise Centre | Pettelaarpark 1 5216 PC 's-Hertogenbosch Nederland | Pettelaarpark 1 | 5216 PC 's-Hertogenbosch | Nederland | 2006-0124 |
| Pettelaarpark 1 | | | | | |
| 5216 PC 's-Hertogenbosch | | | | | |
| Nederland | | | | | |
| OEEK | Ethnikis Antistaseos, 41 GR-14234 Nea Ionia Athens | Ethnikis Antistaseos, 41 | GR-14234 Nea Ionia | Athens | 2006-0123 |
| Ethnikis Antistaseos, 41 | | | | | |
| GR-14234 Nea Ionia | | | | | |
| Athens | | | | | |
| CIRIUS | Fiolstræde 44 DK-1171 København K | Fiolstræde 44 | DK-1171 København K | 2006-0122 | 18.12.2006 |
| Fiolstræde 44 | | | | | |
| DK-1171 København K | | | | | |
| VDAB | Keizerslaan 11 B-1000 Brussel | Keizerslaan 11 | B-1000 Brussel | 2006-0121 | 11.12.2006 |
| Keizerslaan 11 | | | | | |
| B-1000 Brussel | | | | | |

---
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-24-00076-CV

__________________

IN RE GOLDSTAR AMUSEMENT, INC.

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

172nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E-0209867

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Goldstar Amusement, Inc. filed a mandamus petition to compel the trial court 

to vacate its February 19, 2024 order compelling production of documents. We 

stayed the challenged document production in the trial court and requested a 

response from the Real Party in Interest.

On May 2, 2024, Relator filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this mandamus 

proceeding. Relator informs the Court that the parties have resolved the underlying 

dispute and action below with all parties. We grant the motion, lift our stay order of 

March 1, 2024, and dismiss this original proceeding without reference to the merits. 
2

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on April 1, 2024

Opinion Delivered May 23, 2024

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Suriya Elnatanova, Respondent, v Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent, and Vyachgeslav Iskhakbayev, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 239]

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richardson, J.), dated January 9, 2006, as, after a hearing, directed that his visitation with the child be supervised.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

*803The determination of whether visitation should be supervised is a matter left to the Family Court’s sound discretion, and its findings, to which deference is to be accorded, will not be disturbed on appeal unless they lack a sound basis in the record *(see Matter of Rho v Rho,*19 AD3d 605 [2005]). In view of the evidence of domestic violence by the father against the mother in the child’s presence, the father’s excessive corporal punishment of the child, and the father’s consistent pattern of detrimental behavior against the mother, the Family Court properly found that the child’s visitation with the father should be supervised *(see Matter of James Joseph M. v Rosana R.,*32 AD3d 725 [2006]; *Matter of Kargoe v Mitchell,*12 AD3d 978 [2004]; *Matter of Anaya v Hundley,*12 AD3d 594 [2004]; *Matter of Rosario WW. v Ellen WW.,*309 AD2d 984 [2003]).

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to order another forensic evaluation of the parties and the child. Forensic evaluations already had been conducted during the neglect phase of the proceedings, heard by the same Judge who presided over the custody/visitation phase, and there was sufficient testimony to enable the court to resolve the custody/visitation issue without additional evaluations *(see generally Matter of Kubista v Kubista,*11 AD3d 743 [2004]; *Matter of Nunnery v Nunnery,*275 AD2d 986 [2000]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.