alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006313EN.01002401.xml

| 20.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4430 — Doosan/Mitsui Babcock)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 313/09)

On 11 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4430. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4430. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
H. Res. 83

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 25, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 669) to amend the Peace Corps Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2000 through 2003 to

carry out that Act. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on International Relations. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The

bill shall be considered as read. During consideration of the

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amend-
2

•HRES 83 EH

ments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
### §1701f–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–19, §5(c), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 21

Section, act Aug. 10, 1948, ch. 832, title III, §304, as added July 15, 1949, ch. 338, title IV, §401, 63 Stat. 431, provided for appointment, powers, and compensation of a Director. Section was previously repealed by Pub. L. 89–534, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 655.
### §3045. Investigations and surveys respecting new services, etc., by cooperative not-for-profit organizations

The Office may undertake investigations of new types of services which can more effectively be provided through cooperative not-for-profit organizations and make surveys of areas where the increased use of such organizations will contribute to the economic well-being of the community.

(Pub. L. 95–351, title II, §205, Aug. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 512.)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-29 

December 20, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022(a) Benefits Guaranteed. Type of Benefits Guaranteed 

OPINION: 

 Secretary Brennan has asked me to respond to your letter dated November 14, 1974. You asked whether, if you

terminate your present employment prior to January, 1978 your vested interest in a multi-employer pension plan would

be protected by the insurance provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Act of 1974 in the event the plan

terminated after January 1, 1978. 

The answer is that by statute this Corporation is obligated to guarantee "the payment of nonforfeitable benefits" to

participants in plans terminating after they become subject to the Act. For purposes of your inquiry, "vested" and

"nonforfeitable" have the same meaning. Since you would remain a participant in the plan for statutory purposes after

you terminate your employment, your nonforfeitable benefits would be insured. 

I trust this answers your inquiry. 

Steven E. Schanes 

Acting Executive Director
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the “**Company**”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”),I, Jonathan K. Hsu, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

August 9, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ Jonathan K. Hsu                                 |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)        |

 

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.*

 

----
#### In the Matter of Pedro A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 148]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Pedro A. appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated January 28, 2005, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court also dated January 28, 2005, made after a hearing, finding that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 14 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has broad discretion in determining dispositions *(see Matter of Richard W.,*13 AD 3d 1063, 1064 [2004]; *Matter of Rudolph S.,*13 AD3d 459, 460 [2004]; *Matter of Todd B.,*190 AD2d 1035 [1993]; *see also*Family Ct Act § 141). In light of the nature of the appellant’s conduct, the continued presence of the victim in his household, and the appellant’s consistent failure to comply with the requirement that he obtain treatment, the Family Court providently exercised that discretion in its disposition here. “The least restrictive alternative test does not require the court to actually try the lowest form of intervention, have it fail, and then try each succeeding level of intervention before ordering . . . placement” *(Matter of Rudolph S., supra*at 460 [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Matter of Anthony M.,*142 AD2d 731 [1988]). The Family Court’s determination demonstrated that it carefully considered the less-restrictive alternatives to the appellant’s placement, and *462properly balanced the needs of the juvenile and the need for the protection of the community, as it is required to do *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2]).

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, he was not entitled to the benefit of any favorable terms of disposition he may have been promised inasmuch as he concededly failed to comply with certain of the conditions imposed as prerequisites to the promised disposition *(see Matter of Edwin L., 88*NY2d 593, 602-603 [1996]; *cf. People v Outley,*80 NY2d 702 [1993]; *People v Jackson,*3 AD3d 581 [2004]; *People v Thomas,*300 AD2d 196 [2002]).

In light of the foregoing, we do not reach the remaining contentions of the presentment agency. Schmidt, J.R, Spolzino, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER I—FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
##### 



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
REGARDING FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDING

SEPTEMBER 30, 2003, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


EXHIBIT 32.2

I, Stephanie Schmitt, Chief Financial Officer of Specialty Trust, Inc. (
Company), hereby state and certify in this written statement that:

(a)  The quarterly report of the Company filed on form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                      |  |                         |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Stephanie Schmitt |  | Dated November 12, 2003
|                      |  |                        
|Name:                 |  | Stephanie Schmitt       |  | 
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 

This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

39
# C_2010195EN.01000401.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 23 April 2010 — Unió de Pagesos de Catalunya v Administración del Estado and Coordinadora de Organizaciones Agricultores y Ganaderos — Iniciativa Rural del Estado Español

(Case C-197/10)

2010/C 195/07

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Unió de Pagesos de Catalunya

Applicant:

Defendants: Administración del Estado and Coordinadora de Organizaciones Agricultores y Ganaderos — Iniciativa Rural del Estado Español

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 9(2)(b) of Royal Decree 1470/2007 of 2 November 2007, which makes the opportunity to acquire entitlement to single payments from the national reserve subject to the condition that young farmers should have set up their first business under a Rural Development Programme established under Council Regulation No 1698/2005 (1) of 20 September 2005, compatible with Article 42(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (2) of 29 September 2003?

1

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2005 L 277, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 (OJ 2003 L 270, p. 1).

2

---
Egiar gum BEREEME MMI EINRIZEIVATEi 

conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Vincent Arthur Molinski 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
§ 100.147 Volunteer activity for party committees. The payment by a state or local committee of a political party of the costs of campaign materials (such as pins, bumper stickers, handbills, brochures, posters, party tabloids or newsletters, and yard signs) used by such committee in connection with volunteer activities on behalf of any nominee(s) of such party is not an expenditure, provided that the following conditions are met: ( a ) *Exemption does not apply to general public communications or political advertising.* Such payment is not for costs incurred in connection with any broadcasting, newspaper, magazine, billboard, direct mail, or similar type of general public communication or political advertising. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term *direct mail* means any mailing(s) by a commercial vendor or any mailing(s) made from commercial lists.
( b ) *Allocation.* The portion of the cost of such materials allocable to Federal candidates is paid from contributions subject to the limitations and prohibitions of the Act. *But see* 11 CFR part 300 for exempt activities that also constitute Federal election activity.
( c ) *Contributions designated for Federal candidates.* Such payment is not made from contributions designated by the donor to be spent on behalf of a particular candidate or candidates for Federal office. For purposes of this paragraph, a contribution shall not be considered a designated contribution if the party committee disbursing the funds makes the final decision regarding which candidate(s) shall receive the benefit of such disbursement.
( d ) *Distribution of materials by volunteers.* Such materials are distributed by volunteers and not by commercial or for-profit operations. For the purposes of this paragraph, payments by the party organization for travel and subsistence or customary token payments to volunteers do not remove such individuals from the volunteer category.
( e ) *Reporting.* If made by a political party committee, such payments shall be reported by that committee as disbursements, in accordance with 11 CFR 104.3, but need not be allocated to specific candidates in committee reports.
( f ) *State candidates and their campaign committees.* Payments by a State candidate or his or her campaign committee to a State or local political party committee for the State candidate's share of expenses for such campaign materials are not expenditures, provided the amount paid by the State candidate or his or her committee does not exceed his or her proportionate share of the expenses.
( g ) *Exemption not applicable to campaign materials purchased by national party committees.* Campaign materials purchased by the national committee of a political party and delivered to a State or local party committee, or materials purchased with funds donated by the national committee to such State or local committee for the purchase of such materials, shall not qualify under this exemption. Rather, the cost of such materials shall be subject to the limitations of 52 U.S.C. 30116(d) and 11 CFR 109.32.
[67 FR 50585, Aug. 5, 2002, as amended at 67 FR 78680, Dec. 26, 2002; 79 FR 77845, Dec. 29, 2014]
### §331. Certifying checks on State banks admitted as members

It shall be unlawful for any officer, clerk, or agent of any bank admitted to membership under authority of this subchapter, to certify any check drawn upon such bank unless the person or company drawing the check has on deposit therewith at the time such check is certified an amount of money equal to the amount specified in such check. Any check so certified by duly authorized officers shall be a good and valid obligation against such bank, but the act of any such officer, clerk, or agent in violation of this subchapter, may subject such bank to a forfeiture of its membership in the Federal reserve system upon hearing by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §9 (par.), as added June 21, 1917, ch. 32, §3, 40 Stat. 234; amended Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this section", meaning section 9 of act Dec. 23, 1913, which is classified generally to this subchapter (§321 et seq.).

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the fourteenth par. of section 9 of act Dec. 23, 1913, as amended. The fourteenth par. constituted the eleventh par. of section 9 in 1917 (40 Stat. 232), became the twelfth par. in 1927 (44 Stat. 1229), became the thirteenth par. in 1935 (49 Stat. 704), and became the fourteenth par. in 1950 (64 Stat. 458). For further details, see Codification notes set out under sections 321 and 329a of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
§ 27.335 Hearing procedures. ( a ) Any hearing shall be held as expeditiously as possible at the location most conducive to a prompt presentation of any necessary testimony or other proceedings. ( 1 ) Videoconferencing and teleconferencing may be used where appropriate at the discretion of the Presiding Officer.
( 2 ) Each party offering the affirmative testimony of a witness shall present that testimony by declaration, affidavit, or other sworn statement submitted in advance as ordered by the Presiding Officer.
( 3 ) Any witness presented for further examination shall be asked to testify under an oath or affirmation.
( 4 ) The hearing shall be recorded verbatim.
( b ) ( 1 ) A facility or other person may appear and be heard on his or her own behalf or through any counsel of his or her choice who is qualified to possess CVI.
( 2 ) A facility or other person individually, or through counsel, may offer relevant and material information including written direct testimony, which he or she believes should be considered in opposition to the administrative action, or which may bear on the sanction being sought.
( 3 ) The facility or other person individually, or through counsel, may conduct such cross-examination as may be specifically allowed by the Presiding Officer for a full determination of the facts.
[72 FR 17729, Apr. 9, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 41892, Aug. 4, 2021]
### §2205. Interest rates

Interest rates on loans from institutions of the Farm Credit System shall not be subject to any interest rate limitation imposed by any State constitution or statute or other laws. Such limitation is preempted for purposes of this chapter. Interest rates on loans made by agricultural credit corporations organized in conjunction with cooperative associations for the purpose of financing the ordinary crop operations of the members of such associations or other producers and eligible to discount with the Farm Credit Banks shall be exempt from any interest rate limitation imposed by any State constitution or statute or other laws which are hereby preempted for purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.17, as added Pub. L. 96–592, title IV, §403, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3446; amended Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §205(f)(6), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1706; Pub. L. 99–509, title I, §1035, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1878; Pub. L. 100–399, title IX, §901(h), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1007; Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(24), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4682.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 struck out "Federal intermediate credit banks and" before "Farm Credit Banks".

1988—Pub. L. 100–399 substituted "and Farm Credit Banks" for "pursuant to section 2074 of this title".

1986—Pub. L. 99–509 substituted first two sentences for former first sentence which read as follows: "Interest rates on loans from institutions of the Farm Credit System shall be determined with the approval of, as provided in section 2252(a)(5) of this title, the Farm Credit Administration as provided in this chapter, notwithstanding any interest rate limitation imposed by any State constitution or statute or other laws which are hereby preempted for purposes of this chapter."

1985—Pub. L. 99–205 inserted ", as provided in section 2252(a)(5) of this title," after "with the approval of" in first sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–399 effective immediately after amendment made by section 401 of Pub. L. 100–233, which was effective 6 months after Jan. 6, 1988, see section 1001(b) of Pub. L. 100–399, set out as a note under section 2002 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–205 effective thirty days after Dec. 23, 1985, see section 401 of Pub. L. 99–205, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.