alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 83.6 What are the Department's duties? ( a ) The Department will publish in the Federal Register, by January 30 each year, a list of all Indian tribes which the Secretary recognizes to be eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians, in accordance with the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994. The list may be published more frequently, if the Assistant Secretary deems it necessary.
( b ) OFA will maintain guidelines limited to general suggestions on how and where to conduct research. The guidelines may be supplemented or updated as necessary. OFA will also make available examples of portions of documented petitions in the preferred format, though OFA will accept other formats.
( c ) OFA will, upon request, give prospective petitioners suggestions and advice on how to prepare the documented petition. OFA will not be responsible for the actual research on behalf of the petitioner.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Seventy-second Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 147: Minimum 
Operational Performance Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision 
Avoidance Systems Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 147 meeting: Minimum 
Operational Performance Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision 
Avoidance Systems Airborne Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 147: Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems Airborne 
Equipment Agenda for the 72nd meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 24, 2011, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036, telephone (202) 833-9339, fax (202) 
833-9434, Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., and Appendix 2), 
notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 147, Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems 
Airborne Equipment Agenda for the 72nd meeting:

Agenda

March 24, 2011

    <bullet> Open Plenary Session.
     <bullet> SC-147 Co-Chairmen's Opening Remarks.
    <bullet> Introductions.
     <bullet> Approval of Agenda and Summary from 71st meeting of SC-
147.
    <bullet> EUROCAE WG-75: Status of Current Events.
    <bullet> TCAS Program Office Activities.
     <bullet> Monitoring Efforts/TRAMS/TOPA.
    <bullet> AVS and other FAA Activities.
     <bullet> TSOs, etc.
     <bullet> ASIAS/CAST/CAS Steering Committee.
    <bullet> JPDO Safety Working Group Activities.
    <bullet> Working Group Status Reports.
     <bullet> Requirement Working Group.
     <bullet> Surveillance Working Group.
    <bullet> Other Business.
    <bullet> Action Items.
    <bullet> Date, Time, and Place of Next meeting.
    <bullet> Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 25, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-4815 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Tony Scullion, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 20, 2004 /s/ Tony Scullion
Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Ramsey K. Hamadi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                               
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: February 8, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Ramsey K. Hamadi
|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Name: Ramsey K. Hamadi        
|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
§ 5.45 Procedure when testimony or production of documents is sought; general. ( a ) If official information is sought, through testimony or otherwise, by a request or demand, the party seeking such release or testimony must (except as otherwise required by federal law or authorized by the Office of the General Counsel) set forth in writing, and with as much specificity as possible, the nature and relevance of the official information sought. Where documents or other materials are sought, the party should provide a description using the types of identifying information suggested in § 5.3(b). Subject to § 5.47, Department employees may only produce, disclose, release, comment upon, or testify concerning those matters which were specified in writing and properly approved by the appropriate Department official designated in § 5.44. *See United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951). The Office of the General Counsel may waive the requirement of this subsection in appropriate circumstances.
( b ) To the extent it deems necessary or appropriate, the Department may also require from the party seeking such testimony or documents a plan of all reasonably foreseeable demands, including but not limited to the names of all employees and former employees from whom discovery will be sought, areas of inquiry, expected duration of proceedings requiring oral testimony, and identification of potentially relevant documents.
( c ) The appropriate Department official designated in § 5.42 will notify the Department employee and such other persons as circumstances may warrant of its decision regarding compliance with the request or demand.
( d ) The Office of the General Counsel will consult with the Department of Justice regarding legal representation for Department employees in appropriate cases.
# C_2007082EN.01005002.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/50

---

Action brought on 21 February 2007 — ratiopharm v OHIM (BioGeneriX)

(Case T-48/07)

(2007/C 82/105)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ratiopharm GmbH (Ulm, Germany) (represented by S. Völker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 December 2006 in Case R 1048/2004-4 concerning the application for Community trade mark No 002603124; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 December 2006 in Case R 1048/2004-4 concerning the application for Community trade mark No 002603124;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘BioGeneriX ’for goods in Classes 1 and 5 (Application No 2 603 124).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of part of the application for registration.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as the trade mark applied for has the requisite minimum level of distinctiveness and there is no need to preserve its availability.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
## CURC

**- EPRI Technology Roadmap**  Executive Summary

Full Roadmap Report at: http://www.coal.org/roadmap/index.asp August 2012

Coal Technology Advancements

The collaboration between DOE and the private sector over the last three decades to advance coal technologies has proven results

. Today, three out of every four coal plants in the U.S. are equipped with technologies that trace their origins to DOE’s program . In part, other technologies have allowed coal use to increase by more than 63% in the U.S. over the last 30 years while the emissions of SO 2 and NOx have decreased on the order of 70%

. In addition to developing commercial technologies to control criteria pollutants for NOx, SO 2 , particulate matter and mercury, t his public/private partnership is also responsible for the commercial deployment of pressurized fluidized bed combustion systems
, new coal

- based IGCC systems, advanced turbines, and development of materials for highly efficient advanc ed coal combustion power plants. The key to ensure continued success is (1) adequate public support, (2) enhanced levels of funding targeted to specific technology areas, and (3) a regulatory and public policy framework that supports coal use.

The CUR C /EPRI Technology Roadmap
The Roadmap represents a plan for developing technolog ies that convert coal to electricity and other useful forms of energy and manufacturing feedstocks. The Roadmap describes several coal technology advancements that , if developed, will achieve specific cost, performance and environmental goals thereby bene fiting the nation’s environment, economy, and energy security. B y combining the technology advances identified in the Roadmap with opportunities for beneficial uses of captured CO 2 , such as enhanced oil recovery, the Roadmap concludes that tomorrow’s coal

- based power plants equipped with CO 2 capture technology will generate electricity while capturing CO 2 at costs equal to, or less than, today’s power generation plants that use fossil fuels

. Other additional benefits of successfully impleme nting the Roadmap include (1) aggressive reduction of water use/discharge
, (2) significant additional reduction of traditional air pollutants and CO 2 , ( 3 ) enhanced energy and economic security via production of low cost power using the largest U.S. domesti c energy resour ce while u sing captured CO 2 as a commodity to recover crude oil
, and (4) d eploying coal

- based technologies for the production of liquid fuels and other marketable products

. Roadmap costs
Government partnership support and funding commitments are critical to ensure the goals of the Roadmap are accomplished. At current funding (FY 2012) levels, the DOE’s coal R&D budget is nearly sufficient to reach the goals of the Roadmap. These funds, however, must be redirected and focused

u pon Roadmap identified programs

. CURC recognizes that c urrent DOE budgets do not include funding for demonstrations and are unlikely t o receive annual appropriations, so an alternative mechanism to support the large demonstrations described in the Roadmap is proposed and described in the C URC accelerated CO 2 - EOR Initiative.
-  Home 

# Special Permit Safety Evaluation Forms 

Special Permits Safety Documentation Evaluations.pdf (52.71 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.504

## Section §107.504: Period of registration, updates, and record retention

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.504 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.305

## Section §107.305: Investigations

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.305 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
-  Home 
-  Legislative Mandates 

# In This Section

                      -  PIPES Act of 2020 
                      -  PIPES Act of 2016 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Safety Improvement Act of 2012 
                      -  Pipeline Safety Act of 2011 
                      -  The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act 
                      -  Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) / Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020                   

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# PIPES Act of 2020 Overview

The **Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety (PIPES) Act of 2020** was signed on December 27, 2020. This bipartisan law strengthens PHMSA’s safety authority and includes many provisions that will help PHMSA fulfill its mission of protecting people and the environment by advancing the safe transportation of energy and other hazardous materials.

The **rulemakings chart** is responsive to Section 106 of the PIPES Act 2020 which states that, “the Secretary of Transportation shall publish an update on a publicly available web site of the Department of Transportation regarding the status of a final rule for each outstanding regulation...”

Section 106 (a) defines a mandate as:

(1) a final rule required to be issued under the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–90; 125 Stat. 1904) that has not been published in the Federal Register;

(2) a final rule required to be issued under the PIPES Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–183; 130 Stat. 514) that has not been published in the Federal Register; and

(3) any other final rule regarding gas or hazardous liquid pipeline facilities required to be issued under this Act or an Act enacted prior to the date of enactment of this Act that has not been published in the Federal Register.

The links included on this page can provide more details related to the content of the PIPES Act.
-  Home 

# Plan for Converting Approvals into Regulations of General Applicability

Action Plan 2.3.pdf (37.29 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*