alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1098 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1098

 To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to modify service 
requirements relating to creditable service with congressional campaign 
                              committees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 1999

   Mr. Dodd introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to modify service 
requirements relating to creditable service with congressional campaign 
                              committees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CREDITABLE SERVICE WITH CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES.

    Section 8332(m)(1)(A) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
                    ``(A) such employee has at least 4 years and 6 
                months of service on such committees as of December 12, 
                1980; and''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Case number: 01-10-01123-CV

Style: Oncor Electric Delivery Co., LLC, Appellant v. Marco Murillo, Appellee

Date motion filed: April 2, 2014

Party filing motion: Appellant

A majority of the Court having voted in favor of reconsidering this appeal en banc, it is ordered

that the motion for en banc reconsideration is granted. The panel and dissenting opinions are

withdrawn. The cause shall be submitted to the en banc Court without oral argument.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Before: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Sharp, Massengale, 

and Huddle.

Justices Keyes and Sharp dissenting.

Justice Brown not participating. 

Date: June 5, 2014.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SOCIALWISE, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Socialwise, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Collas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



The audits referred to in our report dated July 31, 2000, included the related
financial statement schedule as of July 1, 2000, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended July 1, 2000, included in the annual report on Form
10-K of Applied Science and Technology, Inc. The financial statement schedule is
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements as a whole, presents fairly the
information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-30506, 333-89663 and 333-71467) of Applied Science and
Technology, Inc. of our report dated July 31, 2000, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Applied Science and Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
July 1, 2000 and June 26, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of years in the three-
year period ended July 1, 2000 , which report appears in the July 1, 2000 annual
report on Form 10-K of Applied Science and Technology Inc.

KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 26, 2000
#### In the Matter of Striking the Name of William Heineman from the Original Primary Enrollment Book of the Fourth Election District of the Twenty-third Assembly District, etc. The Board of Elections of the City of New York, Appellant, *v.*William T. Keleher, Respondent.

*Election Law*— *name struck from primary enrollment boolc.*

Appeal by the board of elections from an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 19th day of September, 1907, compelling the said board to strike the name of William Heineman from the primary enrollment book.

McLaughlin; J,':

This case cannot bo distinguished from *Matter of Titus*(117 App. Div. 621; affd., 188 N. Y. 585). Upon the authority of that case, as well as *Matter of O'Brien*(117 App. Div. 628; affd., 188 N. Y. 585) and *Matter of*
      *919
      *McGuire*(117 App. Div. 637; affd., 188 N. Y. 585) the order here appealed from must be reversed and the motion denied. Patterson, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred. Order reversed and application denied.
# Instructions

 Additional information or attachment  Required to describe this situation

When Data is entered and the Cell is highlighted with a blue background and a black font, additional information is needed to describe the situation.You can use fields to the right if it's related to a missing distributee being a beneficiary or a portion of the benefit attributable to non-US source income. You will need to include an attachment if it's related to Prior Payments or Employee Contributions.
https://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/form-mp100-instructions.pdf

# Schedule A

&F	Page &P of &N	&D

# Schedule B

&F	Page &P of &N	&D

Additional information or attachment Required to describe this situation

# Removed via Amendment

# image1.emf
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Working with PHMSA 

# In This Section

                      -  Working with PHMSA 
                      -  PHMSA Business Opportunities 
                      -  Commercial Services Management Program 
                      -  Government Purchase Card 
                      -  Grants 
                      -  State Programs 
                      -  Small Business 
                      -  Fraud Alert 
                      -  Contact Us 

## Related Links

                  -                                          PHMSA R&D Opportunities on PRIMIS                   
                  -                                          Unsolicited Proposal Policy                   

## Contact Us

Acquisition Services
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**PHMSA.Acquisitions@dot.gov**Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# PHMSA Business Opportunities

PHMSA uses FedBizOpps.gov, the single government point-of-entry for Federal government procurement opportunities over $25,000 and Grants.gov, your source to FIND and APPLY for Federal government grants.

Government buyers are able to publicize their business opportunities by posting information directly to FedBizOpps via the internet. Through FedBizOpps, commercial vendors seeking Federal markets for their products and services can search, monitor, and retrieve opportunities solicited by the entire Federal contracting community.

## Additional Resources

Grants.gov Grant programs offered by all Federal grant making agencies.

FedBizOpps Procurement opportunities over $25,000.

GSA Advantage Provides the most convenient one-stop shopping source to meet all your procurement needs.

GSA E-Buy Electronic Request for Quote (RFQ) / Request for Proposal (RFP) system designed to allow Federal buyers to request information, find sources, and prepare RFQs/RFPs, online, for millions of services and products offered through GSA's Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) and Government-wide Acquisition Contracts (GWAC).

FedBid Online marketplace for Government
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated October 19, 2010, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on October 26, 2010, 75 FR 65659, Johnson Matthey Inc., Custom Pharmaceuticals Department, 2003 Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 08066-1742, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IDihydromorphine (9145)
IDifenoxin (9168)
IPropiram (9649)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IILisdexamfetamine (1205)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IINabilone (7379)
IICocaine (9041)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIEcgonine (9180)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIMethadone intermediate (9254)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IINoroxymorphone (9668)
IIAlfentanil (9737)
IIRemifentanil (9739)
IISufentanil (9740)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
                    ( print page 10070)
                    Johnson Matthey Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: February 15, 2011. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2011-3925 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Stewart J. Leonard *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Norwalk

*Thomas A. Flaherty,*in support of the petition.

*Arthur J. Goldblatt,*in opposition.

Submitted June 20

decided June 25, 1974

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford is denied.
EX-34.2
(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial
mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,
2013 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors
that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106
T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
### §1717a. Prohibition against sale of obligations by Federal departments and agencies after June 30, 1966, without compliance with requirements of section 1717(c) of this title or without approval by Secretary of the Treasury; exemption

After June 30, 1966, no department or agency listed in section 1717(c)(2) of this title may sell any obligation held by it except as provided in section 1717(c) of this title, or as approved by the Secretary of the Treasury, except that this prohibition shall not apply to the Government National Mortgage Association.

(Pub. L. 89–429, §6(b), May 24, 1966, 80 Stat. 167; Pub. L. 90–448, title VIII, §807(g), Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 545.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as a part of the Participation Sales Act of 1966, and not as a part of the National Housing Act, which comprises this chapter or the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–448 substituted "the Government National Mortgage Association" for "secondary market operations carried on by the Federal National Mortgage Association".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 90–448, see section 808 of Pub. L. 90–448, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1716b of this title.
#### § 580.11 What if the Commission does not issue a majority decision?

In the absence of a decision of a majority of the Commission within the time provided, the Chair's decision shall constitute the final decision of the Commission, except that if the subject of the appeal is a temporary closure order, the order shall be dissolved.
§ 19.6 How to prove nonprofit status. In general, DHS does not require that a recipient, including a faith-based organization, obtain tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code to be eligible for funding under DHS social service programs. Many grant programs, however, do require an organization to be a nonprofit organization in order to be eligible for funding. Funding announcements and other grant application solicitations for social service programs that require organizations to have nonprofit status will specifically so indicate in the eligibility section of the solicitation. In addition, any solicitation for social service programs that requires an organization to maintain tax-exempt status will expressly state the statutory authority for requiring such status. Recipients should consult with the appropriate DHS program office to determine the scope of any applicable requirements. In DHS social service programs in which an applicant for funding must show that it is a nonprofit organization, the applicant may do so by any of the following means: ( a ) Proof that the Internal Revenue Service currently recognizes the applicant as an organization to which contributions are tax deductible under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code;
( b ) A statement from a State or other governmental taxing body or the State secretary of State certifying that: ( 1 ) The organization is a nonprofit organization operating within the State; and
( 2 ) No part of its net earnings may benefit any private shareholder or individual;
( c ) A certified copy of the applicant's certificate of incorporation or similar document that clearly establishes the nonprofit status of the applicant;
( d ) Any item described in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section if that item applies to a State or national parent organization, together with a statement by the State or parent organization that the applicant is a local nonprofit affiliate; or
( e ) Evidence that the DHS awarding agency determines to be sufficient to establish that the entity would otherwise qualify as a nonprofit organization.
[85 FR 82131, Dec. 17, 2020, as amended at 89 FR 15706, Mar. 4, 2024]
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Manchester United plc (the "Company") for the fiscal
year ended 30 June 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel Glazer, Executive Co-Chairman of the Company and Principal
Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



Date:
October 25, 2012

By:

/s/ JOEL GLAZER Joel Glazer Executive Co-Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
# C_2010234EN.01002102.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 20 May 2010 — Haltergemeinschaft LBL GbR v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf

(Case C-250/10)

()

2010/C 234/34

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Haltergemeinschaft LBL GbR

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Subject to an affirmative answer to the first question referred by order of the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court) on 1 December 2009 in the proceedings for a preliminary ruling already pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union as Case C-79/10, is the person leasing or chartering out his aircraft, including the jet fuel to be provided by him, entitled to the exemption from taxation provided for in Article 14(1)(b) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity? (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wei Shi, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Toyota Auto Receivables 2010-A Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.














March 21, 2013                                                                           By:  /S/ WEI SHI





Wei Shi







Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as Depositor


(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)


- 10 -