alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34.4
(logo) Grant Thornton


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Grant Thornton LLP
1717 Main Street, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201-4667

T 214.561.2300
F 214.561.2370
GrantThornton.com
linkd.in/GrantThorntonUS
twitter.com/GrantThorntonUS

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Situs Holdings LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Compliance ("Management's Assertion"), that Situs Holdings LLC
(the "Company") complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
included in Exhibit A as of December 31, 2013 and for the period January 1, 2013
through December 31, 2013, with respect to the Company's Operating or Trust
Advisor Services performed over the deals listed in Appendix B (the "Platform").
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Services and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
activities with respect to the Platform during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Situs Holdings LLC complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of December 31, 2013 and for the
period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, for the Services is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2014

Grant Thornton LLP
U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
### §1428a. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §718, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 422

Section, act July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §8a, as added May 28, 1935, ch. 150, §4, 49 Stat. 294; amended 1947 Reorg. Plan No. 3, eff. July 27, 1947, 12 F.R. 4981, 61 Stat. 954; Dec. 26, 1974, Pub. L. 93–541, §6, 88 Stat. 1739; Oct. 15, 1982, Pub. L. 97–320, title III, §354, 96 Stat. 1508, established Federal Savings and Loan Advisory Council.
### [§140a. Renumbered §422]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 140a was renumbered section 421 of this title.
#### SCOTT, Movant, v. MORGAN et al., etc., Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 9, 1939.

William S. Kammerer and W. W. Downing for movant.

Richard Priest Dietzman, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the ”Company”) for the quarterended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eugene B. Johnson, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ EUGENE  B. JOHNSON    |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Eugene B. Johnson         |   |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer* |   |
|   | November 10, 2005    |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
# C_2007042EN.01004701.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 January 2007 — Gesner v OHIM

(Case F-119/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Invalidity - Refusal of request for the establishment of an Invalidity Committee)

(2007/C 42/81)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Charlotte Gesner (Birkerod, Denmark) (represented by: J. Vázquez Vázquez and C. Amo Quiñones, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Staff case — Annulment of the decision of OHIM of 2 September 2005 refusing the applicant's request for the establishment of an Invalidity Committee to evaluate her inability to perform the duties corresponding to a post in her function group, and her right to claim invalidity allowance

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 21 April 2005 by which the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) refused Ms Gesner's request for the establishment of an Invalidity Committee; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 21 April 2005 by which the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) refused Ms Gesner's request for the establishment of an Invalidity Committee;

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006, p. 34.

1

---
# C_2007064EN.01001601.xml

| 20.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/16

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 March 2007

(2007/C 64/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3303 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4481 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68325 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2916 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6107 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5798 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,778 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,17 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7095 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8687 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3355 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,898 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8571 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6633 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5626 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3935 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8960 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0308 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 255,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8675 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2912 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3665 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 272,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6567 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,699 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6430 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,970 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3303

JPY

Japanese yen

156,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4481

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68325

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2916

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6107

ISK

Iceland króna

89,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5798

CZK

Czech koruna

27,778

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,17

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7095

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8687

RON

Romanian leu

3,3355

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,898

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8571

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6633

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5626

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3935

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8960

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0308

KRW

South Korean won

1 255,07

ZAR

South African rand

9,8675

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2912

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3665

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 272,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6567

PHP

Philippine peso

64,699

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6430

THB

Thai baht

43,970

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 100.73 News story, commentary, or editorial by the media. Any cost incurred in covering or carrying a news story, commentary, or editorial by any broadcasting station (including a cable television operator, programmer or producer), website, newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication, including any Internet or electronic publication, is not a contribution unless the facility is owned or controlled by any political party, political committee, or candidate, in which case the costs for a news story: ( a ) That represents a *bona fide* news account communicated in a publication of general circulation or on a licensed broadcasting facility; and
( b ) That is part of a general pattern of campaign-related news accounts that give reasonably equal coverage to all opposing candidates in the circulation or listening area, is not a contribution.
[67 FR 50585, Aug. 5, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 18613, Apr. 12, 2006; 89 FR 215, Jan. 2, 2024]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Jerome, Appellant.

[828 NYS2d 78]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered March 2, 2005, convicting him of assault in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to hear and report on the defendant’s challenge to the prosecutor’s exercise of peremptory challenges against black male venirepersons, and if the defendant makes a prima facie showing of purposefiil exclusion, then to hear and report on the prosecutor’s exercise of peremptory challenges, and the *836appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court shall file its report with all convenient speed.

During jury selection, the defense counsel attempted to challenge, pursuant to *Batson v Kentucky*(476 US 79 [1986]), the prosecutor’s motives in using her peremptory challenges to excuse four out of six black male venirepersons. The trial court refused to sustain the *Batson*challenge after stating that such a challenge could succeed only if all black venirepersons, as opposed to just black males, were disproportionately challenged. This was error.

In *People v Garcia*(217 AD2d 119, 122 [1995]), when the trial court refused to sustain a *Batson*challenge on the ground that black females were not a cognizable group, we stated that “by ruling that black females do not have such a status, the trial court precluded full inquiry as to whether the *Batson*test should be applied” *(People v Garcia, supra*at 122). We therefore remitted the matter to the Supreme Court to allow the defendant an opportunity to make out a prima facie *Batson*showing.

Likewise, in the present case, the trial court did not allow the defense counsel to set forth the “facts and other relevant circumstances” which he felt made out a prima facie case of purposeful exclusion by the prosecutor, thus “preclud[ing] full inquiry as to whether the *Batson*test should be applied *(People v Garcia, supra*at 122). Therefore, the defendant is entitled to an opportunity to make out a prima facie *Batson*showing *(see People v Childress,*81 NY2d 263, 266 [1993]; *People v Cardwell,*255 AD2d 451, 452 [1998]; *People v Garcia, supra).*Adams, J.P., Ritter, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11261-11262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMT926000-11-L19100000-BJ0000-LRCME0R04763]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM Montana State Office, 
Billings, Montana, on March 31, 2011.

DATES: Protests of the survey must be filed before March 31, 2011 to be 
considered.

ADDRESSES: Protests of the survey should be sent to Branch of Cadastral 
Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, 
Montana 59101-4669.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Toth, Cadastral Surveyor, Branch 
of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate Drive, 
Billings, Montana 59101-4669, telephone (406) 896-5121 or (406) 896-
5009.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Rocky Mountain Region, Billings, Montana, 
and was necessary to determine individual and tribal trust lands.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Principal Meridian, Montana

T. 27 N., R. 48 E.


[[Page 11262]]


    The plat, in two sheets, representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines, the corrective dependent resurvey 
of the line between sections 18 and 19, the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivision of sections 19 and 21, the adjusted original 
meanders of the former left bank of the Missouri River, downstream, 
through section 19, a certain division of accretion line, and the 
subdivision of sections 19 and 21, and the survey of the meanders of 
the present left bank and the informative traverse of the present left 
bank of the Missouri River, downstream, through section 19, Township 27 
North, Range 48 East, Principal Meridian, Montana, was accepted 
February 16, 2011.
    We will place a copy of the plat, in two sheets, and related field 
notes we described in the open files. They will be available to the 
public as a matter of information. If the BLM receives a protest 
against this survey, as shown on this plat, in two sheets, prior to the 
date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our 
consideration of the protest. We will not officially file this plat, in 
two sheets, until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all 
protests and they have become final, including decisions or appeals.

    Authority:  43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.

    Dated: February 23, 2011.
James D. Claflin,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-4518 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
#### MATTHEWS v. N.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTION

No. 81P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 142; 326 N.C. 483

Motion by plaintiff for reconsideration of the petition for discretionary review denied 10 May 1990.
### §950r. Accessory after the fact

Any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that an offense punishable by this chapter has been committed, receives, comforts, or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial, or punishment shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter may direct.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2607.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 950r, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2624, related to accessory after the fact, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
#### § 301.5 Applique elements in design.

All such parts of the ornament are to be hand-made. If wire is used, it is to be hand-made with no tool other than a hand-made draw plate. These requirements apply to the boxes for stone used in the design.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Wisconsin�s forests**
 
2004 | 2009 | 2014
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.80:F 76/W 75/
Item Number:0083-B-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001014251
 
March 7, 2018
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION 

### F OR 

### E N 

### B ANC 

### R ECONSIDERATION

Case number: 01

- 10

- 0 1123

- C V

Style: Oncor Electric Delivery Co., LLC, Appellant v. Marco Murillo, Appellee

Date motion filed : April 2, 2014

Part y filing motion: Appell ant

A majority of th e Court having voted in favor of reconsidering this appeal en banc, it is ordered

that the motion for en banc reconsideration is granted

. The panel and dissenting opinion s are

withdraw n . The cause shall be submitted to the en banc Court without oral argument.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Before: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Sharp, Massengale

, and Huddle.

Just ices Keyes and Sharp dissenting

.

Justice Brown not participating.

Date: June 5 , 2014

.
Dear Sir or Madam,

I, Aaron I Nettles, am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the 

procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that I, Aaron Nettles, an owner and operator of 

small unmanned aircraft, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) listed below 

so that I, Aaron Nettles, may operate my small ultra light weight unmanned aircraft system (“UAS”) 

commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”).

As described herein I Aaron Nettles, am experienced in flying hobby helicopters for recreational 

purposes. I have added a hobby grade quad-copter UAS to my inventory equipped with a GoPro3+ 

Black camera with intent for aerial videography/cinematography to enhance academic community 

awareness for those individuals and companies unfamiliar with the geographical layout of the metro 

Comanche County area, and augment real estate listing videos; following exemption and approval 

by the FAA. Thereby enhancing their academic research experience for the Comanche County 

area.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,332,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,098,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                    93,000
<INVENTORY>                                    206,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,801,308
<PP&E>                                       2,627,883
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,763,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,665,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,392,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,959
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,031,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,665,787
<SALES>                                      5,792,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,623,360
<CGS>                                        1,345,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,543,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,382,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,211,625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,217,625)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,217,625)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)


</TABLE>
Company Plant Source Source ID Control method Stack ID

CertainTeed Athens, GA Oxy fuel A2 ESP A2

CertainTeed Athens, GA Cold top electric A1 Baghouse A1

CertainTeed Athens, GA Forming A11 2-Scrubber/Mist eliminators A11

CertainTeed Athens, GA Curing, Cooling A11 Scrubber/Mist Eliminator A11

CertainTeed Athens, GA Forming A12 3 wet walled Cyclones A12

CertainTeed Athens, GA Forming A23 2 wet walled Cyclones A23

CertainTeed Chowchilla, CA Oxy fuel C1 DESP/ Caustic Injection High Stack

CertainTeed Chowchilla, CA Curing/Cooling C11 WESP (both Curing and 

Cooling go to a WESP) 

High Stack

CertainTeed Chowchilla, CA Forming C11 Scrubber and WESP High Stack

CertainTeed Chowchilla, CA Forming C12 Wet Cyclonic 

Scrubbers/WESP

High Stack

CertainTeed Kansas City, KS Oxy fuel K1 DESP K1 Stack

CertainTeed Kansas City, KS Oxy fuel K2 DESP K2 Stack

CertainTeed Kansas City, KS Forming, K11 Forming WESP K11 Forming 

Stack

CertainTeed Kansas City, KS Forming, K12 Forming 1S K12 Stack

CertainTeed Kansas City, KS curing, cooling K11 Curing and Cooling WESP (both curing and 

cooling routed to a WESP)

K11 Oven Stack 

(different than 

forming stack)

CertainTeed Kansas City, KS Forming K21 Forming 3 WESPs=> 1 stack K21 Forming 

Stack

CertainTeed Kansas City, KS Curing, cooling K21 Curing and Cooling WESP (both curing and 

cooling routed to a WESP)

K21 Oven Stack 

(Same as forming 

stack)
CertainTeed Kansas City, KS Forming K22 1S Forming K22 Stack

CertainTeed Mountain Top, PA Air gas M1 ESP

CertainTeed Mountain Top, PA Air gas M2 ESP

CertainTeed Mountain Top, 

PA

Forming, curing, 

cooling

M1

CertainTeed Mountain Top, 

PA

Forming, curing, 

cooling

M2
Stack Height (ft) Stack Diameter (ft)Notes/Questions

55 19.75 in ICR: A2 Furnace was idled 10/07

30 37.5 in

80 72 Forming Scrubbers and 1 Curing Scrubber all 

route to single exhaust stack 

80 72 Forming Scrubbers and 1 Curing Scrubber all 

route to single exhaust stack 

90 96 in Unbonded -no binder used manufacturing line

90 96 in ICR: A2 Furnace was idled 10/07

150 8 ft Everything routed to High stack. 

150 8 ft

Everything routed to High stack. 

150 8 ft Everything routed to High stack. 

150 8 ft Everything routed to High stack. Unbonded -no 

binder used manufacturing line

31 ft 5.5 ft

150 ft 3 ft

120 8

Unbonded -no binder used manufacturing line

31 ft 5.5 ft

185 8

185 8
185 17

Unbonded -no binder used manufacturing line

Closed

Closed

Closed

Closed