alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2097. Liens on stock

Each Federal land bank association shall have a first lien on the stock and participation certificates it issues, except on stock or participation certificates held by other Farm Credit System institutions, for the payment of any liability of the stockholder to the association or to the bank, or to both of them.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title II, §2.15, formerly §2.16, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1637; renumbered §2.15, Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §401(w), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 999.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2097, Pub. L. 92–181, title II, §2.16, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 602; Pub. L. 96–592, title II, §211, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3443, related to other services, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 100–233, §401.

A prior section 2.15 of Pub. L. 92–181 was renumbered section 2.14 and is classified to section 2096 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1622, provided that this section is effective 6 months after Jan. 6, 1988.
#### § 300.63 Exception for State candidates (52 U.S.C. 30125(e)(2)).

Section 300.62 shall not apply to a Federal candidate or individual holding Federal office who is a candidate for State or local office, if the solicitation, receipt or spending of funds is permitted under State law; and refers only to that State or local candidate, to any other candidate for that same State or local office, or both. If an individual is simultaneously running for both Federal and State or local office, the individual must raise, accept, and spend only Federal funds for the Federal election.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus OTIS JACKSON, II, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-280, CA-97-389) Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: April 20, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Otis Jackson, II, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and his motion for reconsideraton of that order. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magist rate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Un ited States v. Jackson , Nos. CR-90-280; CA-97-389 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10006-10007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA240


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

[[Page 10007]]

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's Scallop Plan 
Team will meet March 7-8, 2011 in the Council Office at the Old Federal 
Building.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 7, 2011, from 10:30 a.m. to 5 
p.m. and March 8, 2011, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Old Federal Building, 605 W. 
4th Avenue, <greek-i>205, Anchorage, AK.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Stram, Council staff; telephone: 
(907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Agenda: The Scallop Plan Team will review stock status of statewide 
scallop stocks, compile Scallop SAFE report and recommend catch 
specifications, and review and comment on EFH amendments for scallop.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during these meetings. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at 
least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: February 17, 2011.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-3979 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
# C_2007056EN.01002601.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/26

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 January 2007 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-231/04) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Common diplomatic mission in Abuja (Nigeria) - Recovery of a debt by offsetting - Regulations (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 and No 2342/2002 - Principle of good faith in public international law)

(2007/C 56/50)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos and V. Kyriazopoulos, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and F. Dintilhac, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Claim for annulment of the act of 10 March 2004 by which the Commission proceeded to recovery by offsetting of sums due from the Hellenic Republic following its participation in building projects for the diplomatic mission of the Commission and several Member States in Abuja (Nigeria)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the removal of the opinion of the Council's Legal Service of 26 June 1998, submitted by the Hellenic Republic as annex 12 to its application, from the case-file; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the removal of the opinion of the Council's Legal Service of 26 June 1998, submitted by the Hellenic Republic as annex 12 to its application, from the case-file;

| 2. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action;

| 3. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 10.7.2004 (formerly C-189/04).

1

---
§ 700.715 Assignment, modification, and cancellation of grazing permits. ( a ) Grazing permits may be assigned or transferred with the written consent of the contracting parties. The Commissioner will issue a new permit provided the transferee meets qualifications under § 700.711(b).
( b ) Temporary permits issued under § 700.711(d) are directly tied to the term permit and may be transferred with the term permit if the transferee signs the range unit management plan which provides the management for continuation of the temporary grazing permit. Temporary permits will not be transferred and shall be null and void if the term permit transferee does not sign the management plan agreeing to practice conservation management.
( c ) Grazing permits may be assigned for transfer through a notarized document to an heir who meets the qualifications for a grazing permit under § 700.711.
( d ) Grazing permits must be transferred in whole to a single transferee—the transferor relinquishing all grazing privileges at the time of transfer.
( e ) The Commissioner may revoke or withdraw all or any part of a grazing permit by cancellation or modification on a 30 day written notice for violation of the permit or of the management plan, non-payment of grazing fees, violation of these regulations, or because of the termination of the trust status of the permitted land.
[Exhibit 99.4]

                      CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation,
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald L. Kolasch, President,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) 	The Information contained in the Report fairly represents,
in all material aspects, the financial condition and result of
operations on the Company.



By: /s/ Donald L. Kolasch,
President
---------------------------------

April 25, 2003
#### § 5.4 Information collection.

The Office of Management and Budget has informed the Department of the Interior that the information collection requirements contained in part 5 need not be reviewed by them under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*).

[54 FR 283, Jan. 5, 1989]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the date for the March 15, 2011, Meeting of the Kalaupapa National Historical Park Advisory Commission.

# DATES:

The public meeting of the Commission will be held on Tuesday, March 15, 2011, at 9 a.m. (Hawaiian Standard Time).

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at McVeigh Social Hall, Kalaupapa National Historical Park, Kalaupapa, Hawaii 96742.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Steve Prokop, Superintendent, Kalaupapa National Historical Park, P.O. Box 2222, Kalaupapa, Hawaii 96742, telephone (808) 567-6802, or electronically at the following Internet address:                         *Steve_Prokop@nps.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

The March 15, 2011, Commission meeting will consist of the following:

1. Report from the Superintendent.

2. Bridge Replacement and Trail.

3. Memorial Project Updates.

4. Air Transportation Service.

5. General Management Plan Update.

6. Public Comments.

The meeting is open to the public, and time will be reserved for public comment. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least seven days prior to the meeting. Oral comments will be summarized for the record. If persons wish to have their comments recorded verbatim, they must submit them in writing. Before including your address, phone, number, e-mail  address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal  identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Dated: January 13, 2011.

Stephen Prokop,

Superintendent, Kalaupapa National Historical Park.

[FR Doc. 2011-3391 Filed 2-16-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-GJ-P
# C_2007056EN.01001002.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van Koophandel te Brussel, Belgium) — City Motors Groep NV v Citroën Belux NV

(Case C-421/05) (1)

1

(Competition - Distribution agreement relating to motor vehicles - Block exemption - Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 - Article 3(4) and (6) - Termination by the supplier - Right to refer the dispute to an expert or arbitrator or to apply to a national court - Express termination clause - Compatibility with the block exemption - Validity of the grounds for the termination - Effective review)

(2007/C 56/17)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van Koophandel te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: City Motors Groep NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Citroën Belux NV

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank van koophandel te Brussel — Interpretation of Article 3(6) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector (OJ 2002 L 203, p. 30) — Prohibition on inserting an express termination clause in a motor vehicle concession agreement intended to benefit from the exemption

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(6) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector is to be interpreted as meaning that the mere fact that an agreement falling within the scope of that regulation contains an express termination clause, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which such an agreement can be terminated by the supplier as of right and without notice in the event of a breach by the distributor of one of the contractual obligations referred to in that clause, does not have the effect of rendering the block exemption provided for in Article 2(1) of that regulation inapplicable to that agreement.

---

(1)  OJ C 36, 11.2.2006.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

YAN QIU ZHAO

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 0031 2

- CR

Appeal from the

County Court

of Andrews County, Texas

(TC# 19

- 014 5 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9 TH DAY OF AUG UST , 20 2 1.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
# C_2006310EN.01001701.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/17

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — Hensotherm v OHIM — Hensel (HENSOTHERM)

(Case T-366/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Community figurative and word mark HENSOTHERM - National word mark HENSOTHERM - Inadmissibility of the appeal against the decision conferring the cancellation - Time-limits - Restitutio in integrum)

(2006/C 310/33)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Hensotherm AB (Trelleborg, Sweden) (represented by: S. Hallbäck, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Rudolf Hensel GmbH (Börnsen, Germany) (represented by: M. Zöbisch, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 July 2004 (Case R 614/2003-1), concerning proceedings for invalidity of the Community figurative mark HENSOTHERM.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed;

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs);

| 3. | The intervener is ordered to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The intervener is ordered to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 5.2.2005.

1

---
### §144. Certain balances counted toward reserves in dependencies and insular possessions

Four-fifths of the reserve of 15 per centum which a national bank located in a dependency or insular possession or any part of the United States outside of the continental United States, and not a member of the Federal Reserve System, is required to keep, may consist of balances due such bank from associations approved by the Comptroller of the Currency and located in any one of the reserve cities as now or hereafter defined by law or designated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(R.S. §5192; July 1, 1952, ch. 536, 66 Stat. 314; Pub. L. 86–70, §7, June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 142; Pub. L. 86–114, §3(b)(3), July 28, 1959, 73 Stat. 263.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5192 derived from act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, §31, 13 Stat. 108, which was the National Bank Act. See section 38 of this title.

#### Amendments

1959—Pub. L. 86–114 struck out "central reserve or" before "reserve cities".

Pub. L. 86–70 struck out "in Alaska or" before "in a dependency".

1952—Act July 1, 1952, reduced the required amount of cash on hand from two-fifths to one-fifth of the required reserve of 15 per centum.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1959 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 86–114 effective three years after July 28, 1959, see section 3(b) of Pub. L. 86–114, set out as a Central Reserve and Reserve Cities note under former section 141 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exception as to Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by any provision of law in Comptroller of the Currency, referred to in this section, not included in transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 1 of this title.
# C_2006177EN.01003402.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/34

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4104 — Aker Yards/Chantiers de l'Atlantique)

(2006/C 177/16)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes; |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4104. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4104. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
### §2289. General powers

The Bank shall have power—

(1) to sue and be sued, complain, and defend, in its corporate name;

(2) to adopt, alter, and use a corporate seal, which shall be judicially noticed;

(3) to adopt, amend, and repeal bylaws, rules, and regulations as may be necessary for the conduct of its business;

(4) to conduct its business, carry on its operations, and have offices and exercise the powers granted by this chapter in any State without regard to any qualification or similar statute in any State;

(5) to lease, purchase, or otherwise acquire, own, hold, improve, use, or otherwise deal in and with any property, real, personal, or mixed, or any interest therein, wherever situated;

(6) to accept gifts or donations of services, or of property, real, personal, or mixed, tangible or intangible, in aid of any of the purposes of the Bank;

(7) to sell, convey, mortgage, pledge, lease, exchange, and otherwise dispose of its property and assets;

(8) to appoint such officers, attorneys, employees, and agents as may be required, to define their duties, to fix and to pay such compensation for their services as may be determined, subject to the civil service and classification laws, to require bonds for them and pay the premium thereof;

(9) to enter into contracts, to execute instruments to incur liabilities, and to do all things as are necessary or incidental to the proper management of its affairs and the proper conduct of its business;

(10) to act through any corporate or other agency or instrumentality of the United States, and to utilize the services thereof on a reimbursable basis, and any such agency or instrumentality is authorized to provide services as requested by the Bank; and

(11) to determine the character of and the necessity for its obligations and expenditures, and the manner in which they shall be incurred, allowed, and paid, subject to provisions of law specifically applicable to Government corporations.

(Pub. L. 93–224, §10, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 940.)