alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Reports to Congress 
                      -  Congressional Testimony 
                      -  Speeches 

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# April 2, 2019 - Congressional Testimony: Hearing on Pipeline Reauthorization

written-testimony-skip-elliott-house-ti-4219.pdf (203.21 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
| By /S/ CHRIS BALLINGER                          |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |
| Chris Ballinger                                 |
| Group Vice President andChief Financial Officer |
| November 7, 2012                                |

| - 85 -  |
|--------------|
Exhibit 32.1


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K (the "Report") of Glimcher
Realty Trust (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004, I, Michael
P. Glimcher, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), President
and Trustee of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



     Date:  March 9, 2005               /s/ Michael P. Glimcher
            ---------------             ------------------------------------
                                        Michael P. Glimcher
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer),
                                        President and Trustee


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Glimcher Realty
Trust and will be retained by Glimcher Realty Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 0 432

_____________________________
K ELDRIC M ONTE B RADLEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. March 4, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OBERTS , and R OWE , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 4.37

Summary in English of the Telecable Merger Agreement

Consorcio Nekeas, S.A. de C.V. (Nekeas) and Galavisión DTH, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Galavisión DTH),
subsidiaries of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B., entered into a merger agreement with Inmobiliaria Hevi, S.A. de C.V. (Hevi), owner of 64.47% of the shares of Cablevisión Red, S.A. de C.V., pursuant to which each of Nekeas,
Galavisión DTH and Hevi ceased to exist, and a new company named TTelecom H, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (TTelecom H) was created (the Merger Agreement). The Merger Agreement was notarized by public deed number
71,822 dated January 8, 2015, granted before Rafael Manuel Oliveros Lara, notary public number 45 of Mexico City.

A. Creation
of TTelecom H

Pursuant to Article 226 of the General Companies Law, upon effectiveness of the merger, a new company was formed (TTelecom H), which
as of that date owned all the assets, liabilities and equity of each of the merged companies, including any and all of their rights and obligations. The merger was agreed based on the financial statements of each one of the merged companies as of
December 17, 2014, which were approved by the shareholders of each of the merged companies.

B. Liabilities of Merged Companies

TTelecom H assumed all liabilities of any nature of the merged companies at the time of the merger. Such liabilities will be paid, in accordance
with their terms, by TTelecom H.

C. Shareholding Structure of TTelecom H

As a result of the merger, each of the shareholders of the merged companies became shareholders of TTelecom H. The shareholders of Hevi received Series
A shares, while the shareholders of Nekeas and Galavisión DTH received Series B shares. As a result, the capital stock of TTelecom H, at the time of its incorporation, was represented as follows:



| | i. | Axel Eduardo Vielma Ordóñez owned 2,184 Series A shares.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | Luis Edmundo Vielma Ordóñez owned 1,950 Series A shares.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------



| | iii. | José Francisco Vielma Ordóñez owned 1,482 Series A shares.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------



| | iv. | Héctor Vielma Ordóñez owned 1,248 Series A shares.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------



| | v. | María del Carmen Ordóñez Valverde owned 936 Series A shares.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------



| | vi. | Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. owned 2,197 Series B shares.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------



| | vii. | Promo-Industrias Metropolitanas, S.A. de C.V. owned 2 Series B shares.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | viii. | Villacezan, S.A. de C.V. owned 1 Series B share.
| | ----- | --------------------------------------------------

D. Applicable Law and
Jurisdiction

The parties submitted to the applicable laws of Mexico and to the jurisdiction of the courts sitting in Mexico City, Federal
District.
§ 1.5 Disclosure of requested information to individuals. ( a ) Upon submission of proof of identification as required by § 1.4, the Commission shall allow the individual to see and/or obtain a copy of the requested record or shall send a copy of the record to the individual by registered mail. If the individual requests to see the record, the Commission may make the record available either at the location where the record is maintained or at a place more suitable to the requestor, if possible. The record shall be made available as soon as possible but in no event later than 15 days after proof of identification.
( b ) The Commission must furnish each record requested by an individual under this part in a form intelligible to that individual.
( c ) If the Commission denies access to a record to an individual, he or she shall be advised of the reason for the denial and advised of the right to judicial review.
( d ) Upon request, an individual will be provided access to the accounting of disclosures from his or her record under the same procedures as provided above and in § 1.4.
Exhibit 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Net Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James H. Watson, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ James H. Watson, Jr.
---------------------------------
James H. Watson, Jr.
Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Registrant
October 31, 2003


<PAGE>
### §2279a. Power to merge

The banks within a district may merge into a single entity (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as a "merged bank") if the plan of merger is approved by—

(1) the Farm Credit Administration Board;

(2) the respective boards of directors of the banks involved;

(3) a majority of the stockholders of each bank voting, in person or by proxy, at a duly authorized stockholders' meeting with each association entitled to cast a number of votes equal to the number of its voting stockholders; and

(4) in the case of a bank for cooperatives, a majority of the total equity interests in such merging bank for cooperatives (including allocated, but not unallocated, surplus and reserves) held by those stockholders or subscribers to the guaranty fund of the bank voting.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title VII, §7.0, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §416, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1645; amended Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §408(b), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1001.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–399 substituted "The banks" for "Two or more banks" in introductory provisions, and in par. (3) substituted "with each association entitled to cast a number of votes equal to the number of its voting" for "in accordance with the provisions of section 2223(c) of this title relating to the casting of votes by".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–399 effective as if enacted immediately after enactment of Pub. L. 100–233, which was approved Jan. 6, 1988, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 100–399, set out as a note under section 2002 of this title.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00695-CV

James W. VOLBERDING, as Receiver for Charles Locascio,

Manuel Zamora, Jr. and Amelia Zamora,

Appellants

v.

Christopher John LOCASCIO, Matthew Locascio,

Remy Locascio, Sarah Locascio, and Charles Locascio,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-03958

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2020

VACATED AND REMANDED 

On February 23, 2020, appellant James W. Volberding filed “Receiver’s Agreed Motion 

to Dismiss and to Vacate Judgment.” The agreed motion, which is signed by counsel for all of the 

parties, states that the parties have settled the underlying dispute. The motion requests that the 

trial court’s judgment be vacated and that a “final appellate judgment and mandate” be rendered. 

The motion is granted. However, because the parties did not provide us with the specific judgment 

to be rendered, we must remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment. Accordingly, 
04-19-00695-CV

- 2 -

the “Agreed Final Judgment” of the trial court signed on August 15, 2019 is set aside without 

regard to the merits and the cause is remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in 

accordance with the parties’ mediated settlement agreement. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). 

PER CURIAM
# C_2007095EN.01003302.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/33

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Jaworznie (Republic of Poland) lodged on 7 March 2007 — Piotr Kawala v Gmina Miasta Jaworzna

(Case C-134/07)

(2007/C 95/63)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Jaworznie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Piotr Kawala

Applicant:

Defendant: Gmina Miasta Jaworzna

Defendant:

Question referred

The following question is referred to the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Luxembourg pursuant to Article 234 EC: Does Article 90 EC prevent the application of Paragraph 1 of the Regulation of the Minister for Infrastructure of 28 July 2003 on the amount of the charges for a vehicle registration card to the extent that it makes registration of a vehicle brought in from outside the Republic of Poland, from another Member State, dependent upon payment of a charge for issue of a vehicle registration card amounting to PLN 500?

---
# C_2007056EN.01002003.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (United Kingdom) made on 28 December 2006 — 02 Holdings Limited & 02 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited

(Case C-533/06)

(2007/C 56/37)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: 02 Holdings Limited & 02 (UK) Limited

Applicants:

Defendant: Hutchinson 3G UK Limited

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Where a trader, in an advertisement for his own goods or services uses a registered trade mark owned by a competitor for the purpose of comparing the characteristics (and in particular the price) of goods or services marketed by him with the characteristics (and in particular the price) of the goods or services marketed by the competitor under that mark in such a way that it does not cause confusion or otherwise jeopardize the essential function of the trade mark as an indication of origin, does his use fall within either (a) or (b) of Art. 5 of Directive 89/104 (1)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where a trader, in an advertisement for his own goods or services uses a registered trade mark owned by a competitor for the purpose of comparing the characteristics (and in particular the price) of goods or services marketed by him with the characteristics (and in particular the price) of the goods or services marketed by the competitor under that mark in such a way that it does not cause confusion or otherwise jeopardize the essential function of the trade mark as an indication of origin, does his use fall within either (a) or (b) of Art. 5 of Directive 89/104 (1)?

1

| 2. | Where a trader uses, in a comparative advertisement, the registered trade mark of a competitor, in order to comply with Art. 3a of Directive 84/450 (2) as amended must that use be ‘indispensable’ and if so what are the criteria by which indispensability is to be judged? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Where a trader uses, in a comparative advertisement, the registered trade mark of a competitor, in order to comply with Art. 3a of Directive 84/450 (2) as amended must that use be ‘indispensable’ and if so what are the criteria by which indispensability is to be judged?

2

| 3. | In particular, if there is a requirement of indispensability, does the requirement preclude any use of a sign which is not identical to the registered trade mark but is closely similar to it? |
| --- | --- |

3.

In particular, if there is a requirement of indispensability, does the requirement preclude any use of a sign which is not identical to the registered trade mark but is closely similar to it?

---

(1)  OJ L 40, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 250, p. 17.

2

---
Unassociated Document


    EXHIBIT 10.1


     

    FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED
AND RESTATED ADVISORY AGREEMENT

     

     

    THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND
RESTATED ADVISORY AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is dated
as of as of June 11, 2008, by and between SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES
TRUST, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the "Company"), and REIT MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Advisor").

     

    RECITAL:

     

    The Company and
the Advisor are parties to an Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, dated as
of January 1, 2006 (the "Advisory
Agreement").

     

    The Company and
the Advisor wish to amend the Advisory Agreement to adjust the calculation of
the Advisory Fee (as defined therein) with respect to certain medical office
buildings, clinics and biomedical, pharmaceutical and laboratory buildings which
the Company has contracted to buy from HRPT Properties Trust and/or certain of
its subsidiaries ("HRPT") pursuant to
various purchase and sale agreements, all dated as of May 5, 2008 (collectively,
the "Purchase
Agreements").

     

    NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the foregoing and the agreements set forth in this
Amendment, the Company and the Advisor agree as follows:

     

    1.           Notwithstanding
anything in Section 9 of the Advisory Agreement to the contrary, with respect to
any properties acquired by the Company pursuant to the Purchase Agreements,
the  "Average Invested Capital" (as defined in the Advisory Agreement)
for each such property on the date of acquisition shall equal the undepreciated
gross book value thereof on the books of HRPT immediately prior to acquisition
of such property by the Company (including capitalized closing and other costs
and costs which may be allocated to intangibles or are unallocated) and all
subsequent adjustments shall be based on that initial book value.

     

    2.           As
amended hereby, the Advisory Agreement is hereby ratified and
confirmed.

     

    


    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company and the Advisor have caused this Amendment to be duly executed, as a
sealed instrument, as of the date first set forth above.

     

                SENIOR HOUSING
PROPERTIES TRUST

     

    


                By: /s/ David J.
Hegarty

                David J.
Hegarty

                President

    


    


                REIT MANAGEMENT &
RESEARCH LLC

     

     

                By:/s/ Mark L.
Kleifges

                Mark L.
Kleifges

                Senior Vice
President

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    -2-
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of thePublic Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Joel A. Ronning, Chief Executive Officer of Digital River,Inc. (the “Company”), and Carter D. Hicks, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by thePeriodic Report and the results of operations of the Company for the periodcovered by the Periodic Report.

 
| Dated: | August 14,  2003 |   |                      |
|--------|------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |             |   |                      |
|   |             |   |                      |
|   |             | By:    | /s/ JOEL A. RONNING       |
|   |             |   | Joel A. Ronning           |
|   |             |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|   |             |   |                      |
|   |             |   |                      |
|   |             | By:    | /s/ CARTER D. HICKS       |
|   |             |   | Carter D. Hicks           |
|   |             |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----