alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |
|--|

FDA Home Page |CFSAN Home | Search/Subject Index |Q & A | Help

# Color Certification Reports

### Overview

### Report on the Certification of Color Additives

      - Fiscal Year 2004         First quarter, October 1-December 31
        - Second quarter, January 1-March 31            Third quarter, April 1-June 30
          - Fourth quarter, July 1-September 30                     Fiscal Year 2003
            - First quarter, October 1-December 31                Second quarter, January 1-March 31
              - Third quarter, April 1-June 30                  Fourth quarter, July 1-September 30
                - Fiscal Year 2002                   First quarter, October 1-December 31
                  - Second quarter, January 1-March 31                      Third quarter, April 1-June 30
                    - Fourth quarter, July 1-September 30                           Fiscal Year 2001
                      - First quarter, October 1-December 31                          Second quarter, January 1-March 31
                        - Third quarter, April 1-June 30                            Fourth quarter, July 1-September 30
                          - Fiscal Year 2000                             First quarter, October 1-December 31
                            - Second quarter, January 1-March 31                                Third quarter, April 1 to June 30
                              - Fourth quarter, July 1 to September 30                                     Fiscal Year 1999
                                - First quarter, October 1-December 31                                    Second quarter, January 1-March 31
                                  - Third quarter, April 1 to June 30                                      Fourth quarter, July 1 to September 30
                                    - Fiscal Year 1998                                       First quarter, October 1-December 31
                                      - Second quarter, January 1-March 31                                          Third quarter, April 1 to June 30
                                        - Fourth quarter, July 1 to September 30                                               Fiscal Year 1997
                                          - Fourth quarter, July 1-September 30             Color Additives     CFSAN Home |CFSAN Search/Subject Index |CFSAN Disclaimers & Privacy Policy |CFSAN Accessibility/HelpFDA Home Page |Search FDA Site |FDA A-Z Index |Contact FDA
FDA/Center for Food Safety & Applied NutritionHypertext updated by cjm/dvd/dav October 20, 2004
§ 700.173 Average net earnings of business or farm. ( a ) *Computing net earnings.* For purposes of this subpart, the average annual net earnings of a business or farm operation is one-half of its net earnings before Federal, State and local income taxes, during the two taxable years immediately prior to the taxable year in which it was displaced. However, if the business or farm was not in operation for the full two taxable years prior to displacement, net earnings shall be computed on the basis of the actual period of operation on the acquired site, projected to an annual rate. Also, average annual net earnings may be based upon a different period of time when the Commission determines it to be more equitable. Net earnings include any compensation obtained from the business or farm operation by its owner, his spouse, or dependents.
( b ) *Documentation.* A displaced person who elects to receive a fixed payment in lieu of actual expenses incurred in moving his business or farm shall furnish the Commission proof of his net earnings through income tax returns, certified financial statements or other reasonable evidence.
-  Home 

# Status Update on Special Permits Identified for Further Assessment

STATUS UPDATE ON SPECIAL PERMITS _April 2010_.pdf (61.23 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
§ 126.29 Effect of TSOB Review Panel action. ( a ) Any person substantially affected by a TSOB Review Panel's action, or the TSA Administrator when he or she decides that the Panel's action will have a significant adverse impact on carrying out 49 U.S.C. subtitle VII, part A, may obtain judicial review in an appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 46110. The Administrators of the FAA and TSA must be made parties to any civil action filed in a U.S. Court of Appeals seeking review of a TSOB Review Panel action.
( b ) If judicial review is not obtained, the action of the TSOB Review Panel is final and binding on the parties for the purpose of resolving the particular decision under review.
§ 27.405 Review and preemption of State laws and regulations. ( a ) As per current law, no law, regulation, or administrative action of a State or political subdivision thereof, or any decision or order rendered by a court under State law, shall have any effect if such law, regulation, or decision conflicts with, hinders, poses an obstacle to, or frustrates the purposes of this regulation or of any approval, disapproval, or order issued there under. ( 1 ) Nothing in this part is intended to displace other federal requirements administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Transportation, or other federal agencies.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) State law, regulation, or administrative action defined. For purposes of this section, the phrase “State law, regulation, or administrative action” means any enacted law, promulgated regulation, ordinance, administrative action, order, decision, or common law standard of a State or any of its political subdivisions.
( c ) *Submission for review.* Any chemical facility covered by these regulations and any State may petition the Department by submitting a copy of a State law, regulation, administrative action, decision, or order of a court for review under this section.
( d ) *Review and opinion* — ( 1 ) *Review.* The Department may review State laws, administrative actions, opinions, or orders of a court under State law and regulations submitted under this section, and may offer an opinion whether the application or enforcement of the State law or regulation would conflict with, hinder, pose an obstacle to, or frustrate the purposes of this part.
( 2 ) *Opinion.* The Department may issue a written opinion on any question regarding preemption. If the question was submitted under subsection (c) of this part, the Executive Assistant Director will notify the affected chemical facility and the Attorney General of the subject State of any opinion under this section.
( 3 ) *Consultation with States.* In conducting a review under this section, the Department will seek the views of the State or local jurisdiction whose laws may be affected by the Department's review.
[72 FR 17729, Apr. 9, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 41893, Aug. 4, 2021]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict.                    

*Date:*                         March 15, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 10 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ramesh Vemuri, PhD, Chief, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C-212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7700,                         *rv23r@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 25, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4826 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### STATE v. CESAR

No. 182P90

Case below: 98 N.C.App. 155

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.
-  Home 
-  Safety Awareness 

# In This Section

                      -  Safety Awareness Overview 
                      -  Pipeline Leak Recognition and What to Do 
                      -  Excavation Enforcement Final Rule                          -  Overview 
                        -  Rule Language 
                        -  Determinations of Adequacy 
                        -  Frequently Asked Questions 
                      -  Pipeline Emergency Responders Initiative (PERI)                          -  Overview 
                        -  PERI FAQs 
                        -  Eastern Region 
                        -  Southern Region 
                        -  Central Region 
                        -  Southwest Region 
                        -  Western Region 
                      -  Safety Awareness Reports Search 
                      -  Historical Pipeline Incidents 
                      -  Pipeline Failure Investigation Reports 
                      -  Marine Damage Prevention 

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Fax:**202-366-4566****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Historical Pipeline Incidents

About 2.6 million miles of transportation pipelines deliver the energy products the American public needs to keep its homes and businesses running. While rare, some pipeline incidents can be fatal and cost millions in property damage. PHMSA's Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) holds all pipeline operators accountable for complying with federal pipeline safety regulations, and played integral roles  in the investigations of tragic pipeline incidents in San Bruno, California,  Allentown, Pennsylvania, and Marshall, Michigan. In its commitment to safety awareness and outreach, OPS has provided a historical look at high-profile pipeline incidents. 
                      - **Allentown, Pennsylvania - February 9, 2011**
                      - **San Bruno, California - September 9, 2010**
                      - **Marshall, Michigan - July 26, 2010**
# C_2007042EN.01001601.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/16

---

Appeal brought on 21 December 2006 by Athinaiki Techniki AE against the order delivered by the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) on 26 September 2006 in Case T-94/05 Athinaiki Techniki AE v Commission

Athinaiki Techniki AE

Commission

(Case C-521/06 P)

(2007/C 42/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Athinaiki Techniki AE (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities, Athens Resort Casino AE Symmetochon

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | annul the contested order; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested order;

| — | grant the forms of order sought at first instance; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the forms of order sought at first instance;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant relies on a single plea in support of its appeal, based on the error allegedly committed by Court of First Instance in its legal characterisation of the letter deciding to take no further action on its complaint. First, the decision taken by the Commission not to take any further action clearly assumes a final character in the light of the file; secondly, it is unambiguously apparent from the context in which the Commission ruled that it had indeed implicitly taken a reasoned decision on the classification of the State aid which was the subject of the complaint. Consequently, the Court of First Instance erred in law in finding that the contested letter could not be subject of an action and in dismissing the action as inadmissible.

---
### §1758. Bylaws

In order to simplify the organization of Federal credit unions the Board shall from time to time cause to be prepared a form of organization certificate and a form of bylaws, consistent with this chapter, which shall be used by Federal credit union incorporators, and shall be supplied to them on request. At the time of presenting the organization certificate the incorporators shall also submit proposed bylaws to the Board for its approval.

(June 26, 1934, ch. 750, title I, §108, formerly §8, 48 Stat. 1219; 1947 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §401, eff. July 1, 1947, 12 F.R. 4534, 61 Stat. 952; June 29, 1948, ch. 711, §§1, 2, 62 Stat. 1091; renumbered §9 and amended Pub. L. 86–354, §1, Sept. 22, 1959, 73 Stat. 631; Pub. L. 91–206, §2(1), Mar. 10, 1970, 84 Stat. 49; renumbered title I, §108, Pub. L. 91–468, §1(2), Oct. 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 994; amended Pub. L. 95–630, title V, §502(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3681.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–630 substituted "Board" for "Administrator" in two places, and "its approval" for "his approval".

1970—Pub. L. 91–206 substituted "Administrator" for "Director" in two places.

1959—Pub. L. 86–354 substituted "from time to time" for ", upon the passage of this Act,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–630 effective on expiration of 120 days after Nov. 10, 1978, and transitional provisions, see section 509 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 1752 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions of Farm Credit Administration and Governor thereof, generally, see notes set out under section 1751 of this title.

Functions of Governor of Farm Credit Administration under this section transferred to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1947.
# C_2007082EN.01004401.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/44

---

Action brought on 12 February 2007 — Zipcar v OHIM — Canary Islands Car (ZIPCAR)

(Case T-36/07)

(2007/C 82/94)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Zipcar, Inc. (Cambridge, USA) (represented by: M. Elmslie, Solicitor, and N. Saunders, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Canary Islands Car SL (Lanzarote, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 30 November 2006 in its entirety and remit the application to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to allow it to proceed; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 30 November 2006 in its entirety and remit the application to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to allow it to proceed;

| — | order that the Office pay the applicant's costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the Office pay the applicant's costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ZIPCAR ’for goods and services in classes 9, 39 and 42 — application No 3 139 375

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Canary Islands Car SL

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The national word mark ‘CICAR ’for services in class 39

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in relation to the contested services in class 39

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as there was no likelihood of confusion and the Board of Appeal failed to reach proper conclusions about both the nature of the average consumer of the relevant services and the nature of the relevant market.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2006331EN.01001201.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/12

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — ASML Netherlands BV v Semiconductor Industry Services GmbH (SEMIS)

(Case C-283/05) (1)

1

(Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Recognition and enforcement - Article 34(2) - Judgment given in default of appearance - Ground for refusal - Meaning of the requirement that it must be ‘possible’ for a defendant in default of appearance to commence proceedings to challenge the judgment - Failure to serve the judgment)

(2006/C 331/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ASML Netherlands BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Semiconductor Industry Services GmbH (SEMIS)

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) — Interpretation of Article 34(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Recognition of a default judgment — Possibility of challenge of the decision by the defaulting defendant — No duly effected service or notification

Operative part of the judgment

Article 34(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters is to be interpreted as meaning that it is ‘possible’ for a defendant to bring proceedings to challenge a default judgment against him only if he was in fact acquainted with its contents, because it was served on him in sufficient time to enable him to arrange for his defence before the courts of the State in which the judgment was given.

---

(1)  OJ C 229, 17.9.2005.

1

---
### [§2419. Renumbered §4959]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2419 was renumbered section 2420 of this title and was subsequently repealed. Prior to repeal, text of section 2420 was transferred to section 4953 of this title.
# C_2006244EN.01002502.xml

| 11.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/25

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4182 — Hörmann/MN/ACP JV)

(2006/C 244/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4182. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4182. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
### §4247. Promulgation of regulations

The Attorney General may promulgate any rules, regulations, or guidelines that, in the Attorney General's judgment, are necessary and appropriate to the effective administration of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2594, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4906.)