alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006181EN.01000101.xml

| 3.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 August 2006

(2006/C 181/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2798 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4611 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68215 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1991 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5729 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,28 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,493 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9335 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5386 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,090 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9280 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6711 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4441 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9487 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0698 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0250 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 231,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,8635 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2017 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2595 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 658,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,704 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,063 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2620 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,555 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2798

JPY

Japanese yen

146,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4611

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68215

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1991

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5729

ISK

Iceland króna

91,28

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,493

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9335

RON

Romanian leu

3,5386

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,090

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9280

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6711

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4441

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9487

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0698

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0250

KRW

South Korean won

1 231,49

ZAR

South African rand

8,8635

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2017

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2595

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 658,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,704

PHP

Philippine peso

66,063

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2620

THB

Thai baht

48,555

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
H. Res. 9

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 6, 1999.

Resolved, That subparagraph (1) of clause 5(a) of rule

XXVI is amended—

(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘A Member’’; and

(2) by adding at the end the following new subdivision:

‘‘(B) A Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee of the House may accept a gift (other than

cash or cash equivalent) that the Member, Delegate, Resident

Commissioner, officer, or employee reasonably and in good

faith believes to have a value of less than $50 and a cumulative value from one source during a calendar year of less

than $100. A gift having a value of less than $10 does not

count toward the $100 annual limit. Formal recordkeeping is

not required by this subdivision, but a Member, Delegate,

Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee of the House
2

•HRES 9 EH

shall make a good faith effort to comply with this subdivision.’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
-  Home 
-  106 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 106.105

## Section §106.105: PHMSA response to a petition for rulemaking

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 106.105 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
#### Lambert Snyder Company, Respondent, *v.*Eugene P. Smith, Appellant.

First Department,

February 21, 1908.

Practice — change of venue — convenience of witnesses — facilities of travel immaterial.

'It is no answer to a motion to change the place of trial for the convenience of witnesses to say that because of facilities for transportation it is as convenient ■ for the majority of witnesses to come to New York Where the venue is laid as , to go to the county seat of their residence.

. Appeal by the defendant, Eugene P. Smith, from an order of . the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special, Term and entefed-in the office of. the clerk of the county of New -York on the 13tli day of January, 1908, denying the defendant’s . motion to .change the place of trial from the county of New. York to .the ' county, of,Suffolk on the ground of .convenience of witnesses. ■

*Frederick O. Fay,*for the appellant.'

*Julius F. Tobias,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam :

So far as the motion papers disclose, all of the witnesses material to the trial of the action- reside in the county of Suffolk. The cause, of action arose in that county, and it should be tried there. If the plaintiff chose to bring its action for so insignificant a claim in the Supreme Court, it must abide by its ordinary rules respecting the place of trial..... ■

On the papers .presented it was no answer to say that because of facilities for transportation it was as convenient for defendant’s witnesses, to come to the city of New- York as to go from their place of residence to the county seat of Suffolk county.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to change the place of trial from the county of New York to the county of Suffolk for the convenience of witnesses should be granted, with ten dollars costs.

. Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, wfith ten dollars costs.
# C_2007095EN.01001501.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/15

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2007 — Landtag Schleswig-Holstein v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-406/06) (1)

1

(Action of annulment - Court of Justice having no jurisdiction - Referral to Court of First Instance)

(2007/C 95/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Landtag Schleswig-Holstein (represented by: S. Laskowski and J. Caspar, acting as agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of Commission decisions of 10 March 2006 and 23 June 2006 refusing to grant the applicant access to the document SEC(2005) 420, of 22 March 2005, containing a legal analysis relating to a draft framework decision, under discussion in the Council, on the retention of data processed and stored in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communication services or data transmitted on public communications networks, for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of crime and criminal offences, including terrorism (Council document 8958/04 CRIMORG 36 TELECOM 82)

Operative part of the order

| (1) | Case C-406/06 Landtag Schleswig-Holstein v Commission is referred to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Case C-406/06 Landtag Schleswig-Holstein v Commission is referred to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities.

Landtag Schleswig-Holstein

Commission

| (2) | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The costs are reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 2.12.2006, p. 33.

1

---
# C_2007069EN.01000202.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/2

---

Assignment of the Judges to the Chambers

(2007/C 69/03)

At its meeting of 16 January 2007, the Court decided to assign Mr Arabadjiev to the Third and Seventh Chambers.

The composition of the Third and Seventh Chambers is accordingly as follows:

Third Chamber

Mr Rosas, President of the Chamber,

Mr Klučka, Mr Cunha Rodrigues, Mr Lõhmus, Mr Ó Caoimh, Ms Lindh and Mr Arabadjiev, Judges

Seventh Chamber

Mr Klučka, President of the Chamber,

Mr Cunha Rodrigues, Mr Lõhmus, Mr Ó Caoimh, Ms Lindh and Mr Arabadjiev, Judges

At that meeting, the Court decided to assign Ms Toader to the Second and Sixth Chambers.

The composition of the Second and Sixth Chambers is accordingly as follows:

Second Chamber

Mr Timmermans, President of the Chamber,

Mr Kūris, Sir Konrad Schiemann, Mr Makarczyk, Mr Bay Larsen, Mr Bonichot and Ms Toader, Judges

Sixth Chamber

Mr Kūris, President of the Chamber,

Sir Konrad Schiemann, Mr Makarczyk, Mr Bay Larsen, Mr Bonichot and Ms Toader, Judges

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Defense Policy Board

AGENCY: Defense Policy Board, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Policy Board will meet in closed session on March 
15, 2011 from 0800 hrs until 1800 hrs and on March 16, 2011 from 0800 
hrs until 1030 hrs at the Pentagon.
    The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Secretary of Defense, 
Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy 
with independent, informed advice on major matters of defense policy. 
The Board will hold classified discussions on national security 
matters.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App II (1982)], it has 
been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552B (c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to 
the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ann Hansen, 703-571-9232.

    Dated: February 25, 2011.
Morgan F. Park
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-4864 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF JS BUSINESS WORKS, INC. FOR DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         1061822
<NAME>                        JS Business Works, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         364
<SECURITIES>                                   10,493
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,857
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,500
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       230
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,857
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               230
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                215
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            215
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        

</TABLE>
### Issue of Debentures
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

78-28 

November 3, 1978 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4064 Liability of Employers in Multiple Employer & Multiemployer Plans

4064(b) Liability of Employers in Multiple Employer & Multiemployer Plans. Amount of Employer Liability 

OPINION: 

 This has reference to your October 11, 1978 letter concerning employer liability under a terminating multiemployer

plan, and to our October 18, 1978 telephone conversation. 

You asked whether the PBGC has the authority, after it has initially allocated employer liability under Section 4064,

to reallocate the liability of those employers that are unable or unwilling to pay their allocable liability to the other liable

employers. Section 4064 allocates employer liability in terminating plans to which more than one employer contributes

to all employers who maintained the plan as of the plan termination date or contributed to the plan within the five plan

years preceding the termination date based on each such employer's proportionate share of the plan's unfunded liability

for guaranteed benefits. Each employer liable under Section 4064 is liable only for its share of the total unfunded

liability of the plan for guaranteed benefits. 

Section 4064 authorizes the PBGC to prescribe in regulations other equitable [*2] bases for allocating Section 4064

liability. You asked whether the PBGC has begun work on such regulations. You stated that you have been advised that

regulations will not be drafted pending further Congressional action on multiemployer plan coverage under Title IV.

As I indicated to you during our October 18, 1978 telephone conversation, the information you received is incorrect.

Regulations prescribing proposed alternative bases for computing Section 4064 liability are listed on the PBGC work

plan for developing regulations and specifications for such regulations are currently being propared. 

 Finally, as you requested, your letter will be considered in developing regulations to prescribe alternative bases for

computing liability under Section 4064. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### Banks of Federal Reserve System as Stockholders
#### § 513.7 What is the Commission's policy on revoking a debtor's ability to engage in Indian gaming for failure to pay a debt?

The Chairman of the Commission may revoke a debtor's ability to operate, manage, or otherwise participate in the operation of an Indian gaming facility if the debtor inexcusably or willfully fails to pay a debt. The revocation of ability to engage in gaming may last only as long as the debtor's indebtedness.
§ 11.15 Applying the debt against DHS payments. ( a ) *Notice to the Debtor.* DHS sends a written notice to the debtor indicating a certified debt claim was received from the creditor agency, the amount of the debt claimed to be owed by the creditor agency, the estimated date the offset will begin (if more than one payment), and the amount of the deduction(s). For employees, DHS generally begins deductions from pay at the next officially established pay interval. Deductions continue until DHS knows the debt is paid in full or until otherwise instructed by the creditor agency. Alternatively, the amount offset may be an amount agreed upon, in writing, by the debtor and the creditor agency. If a DHS employee retires or resigns, or if his or her employment ends before collection of the debt is complete, DHS continues to offset, under 31 U.S.C. 3716, up to 100% of an employee's subsequent payments until the debt is paid or otherwise resolved. Such payments include a debtor's final salary payment, lump-sum leave payment, and other payments payable to the debtor by DHS. See 31 U.S.C. 3716 and 5 CFR 550.1104(l) and 550.1104(m). If the employee is separated from DHS before the debt is paid in full, DHS will certify to the creditor agency the total amount of its collection. If DHS is aware the employee is entitled to payments from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, Federal Employee Retirement System, or other similar payments, DHS provides written notice to the agency making such retirement payments that the debtor owes a debt (including the amount) and that the provisions of 5 CFR 550.1109 have been fully complied with. The creditor agency is responsible for submitting a certified claim to the agency responsible for making such payments before collection may begin. Generally, creditor agencies will collect such monies through the Treasury Offset Program as described in section 11.4.
( b ) *Notice to the debtor.* DHS provides to the debtor a copy of any notices sent to the creditor agency under this subpart.
( c ) *Transfer of employee debtor to another Federal agency.* If an employee debtor transfers to another Federal agency before the debt is paid in full, DHS notifies the creditor agency and provides it a certification of the total amount of its collection on the debt. The creditor agency is responsible for submitting a certified claim to the debtor's new employing agency before collection may begin.
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.107

## Section §107.107: Application for party status

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.107 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
#### WILLS v. WAKE MEDICAL CENTER

No. 16P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 515

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 March 1990.