alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5.33 Use and collection of Social Security numbers. Each component will ensure that employees authorized to collect information are aware: ( a ) That individuals may not be denied any right, benefit, or privilege because of refusing to provide their Social Security numbers, unless the collection is authorized either by a statute or by a regulation issued prior to 1975; and
( b ) That individuals requested to provide their Social Security numbers must be informed of: ( 1 ) Whether providing Social Security numbers is mandatory or voluntary;
( 2 ) Any statutory or regulatory authority that authorizes the collection of Social Security numbers; and
( 3 ) The uses that will be made of the numbers.
( c ) Including Social Security numbers of an individual on any document sent by mail is not permitted unless the Secretary determines that the inclusion of the number on the document is necessary.
# C_2007095EN.01000402.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2007 — Segi, Araitz Zubimendi Izaga, Aritza Galagara v Council of the European Union, Kingdom of Spain, Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-355/04 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - European Union - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Common Positions 2001/931/CFSP, 2002/340/CFSP and 2002/462/CFSP - Measures concerning persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts - Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice)

(2007/C 95/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Segi, Araitz Zubimendi Izaga, Aritza Galagara (represented by: D. Rouget, avocat)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Finnegan and M. Bauer, Agents) Kingdom of Spain, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 7 June 2004, in case T-338/02 SEGI and Others v Council of the European Union [2004] ECR U-1647, dismissing the applicant's action seeking damages in respect of the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the inclusion of SEGI in the list drawn up under the legislation on the fight against terrorism.

SEGI and Others

Council of the European Union

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Segi, Ms Zubimendi Izaga and Mr Galarraga to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Segi, Ms Zubimendi Izaga and Mr Galarraga to pay the costs.

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 9.10.2004.

1

---
JOHN R. KASICH 


GOVERNOR 


STATE OF OHIO 


September 15, 2011 

Susan Hedman 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 

77 West Jackson Avenue 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Dear Administrator Hedman: 

The state of Ohio supports the inclusion of the West Troy Contaminated Aquifer located 

in Miami County on the next proposed National Priorities List (NPL) update. The 

Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) 

federally-funded site assessments, completed by the Ohio EPA and/or the U.S. EPA, 

have documented that this site poses a significant threat to public health and the 

environment. These assessments further conclude that this site is eligible to be placed 

on the NPL. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

c: 	 Scott J. Nally, Director, Ohio EPA 

Cindy Hafner, Chief, DERR, Ohio EPA
### §949c. Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel

(a) Trial Counsel.—The trial counsel of a military commission under this chapter shall prosecute in the name of the United States.

(b) Defense Counsel.—(1) The accused shall be represented in the accused's defense before a military commission under this chapter as provided in this subsection.

(2) The accused may be represented by military counsel detailed under section 948k of this title or by military counsel of the accused's own selection, if reasonably available.

(3) The accused may be represented by civilian counsel if retained by the accused, provided that such civilian counsel—

(A) is a United States citizen;

(B) is admitted to the practice of law in a State, district, or possession of the United States, or before a Federal court;

(C) has not been the subject of any sanction of disciplinary action by any court, bar, or other competent governmental authority for relevant misconduct;

(D) has been determined to be eligible for access to information classified at the level Secret or higher; and

(E) has signed a written agreement to comply with all applicable regulations or instructions for counsel, including any rules of court for conduct during the proceedings.

(4) If the accused is represented by civilian counsel, military counsel shall act as associate counsel.

(5) The accused is not entitled to be represented by more than one military counsel. However, the person authorized under regulations prescribed under section 948k of this title to detail counsel, in such person's sole discretion, may detail additional military counsel to represent the accused.

(6) Defense counsel may cross-examine each witness for the prosecution who testifies before a military commission under this chapter.

(7) Civilian defense counsel shall protect any classified information received during the course of representation of the accused in accordance with all applicable law governing the protection of classified information, and may not divulge such information to any person not authorized to receive it.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2585.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 949c, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2610, related to duties of trial counsel and defense counsel, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
{"agency":"PRC","generated":"2018-04-09 10:04:24","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2018"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["PRC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["26"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["18"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["8"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2018","quarter":"Q2"}
# C_2006178EN.01004005.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/40

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 31 May 2006 — Stradeblu v Commission

(Case T -179/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 178/75)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005.

1

---
### §1756. Reports and examinations

Federal credit unions shall be under the supervision of the Board, and shall make financial reports to it as and when it may require, but at least annually. Each Federal credit union shall be subject to examination by, and for this purpose shall make its books and records accessible to, any person designated by the Board.

(June 26, 1934, ch. 750, title I, §106, formerly §6, 48 Stat. 1218; Dec. 6, 1937, ch. 3, §1, 51 Stat. 4; 1947 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §401, eff. July 1, 1947, 12 F.R. 4534, 61 Stat. 952; June 29, 1948, ch. 711, §§1, 2, 62 Stat. 1091; renumbered §7 and amended Pub. L. 86–354, §1, Sept. 22, 1959, 73 Stat. 629; Pub. L. 91–206, §2(1), Mar. 10, 1970, 84 Stat. 49; renumbered title I, §106, Pub. L. 91–468, §1(2), Oct. 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 994; amended Pub. L. 95–630, title V, §508, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3683.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–630 substituted "Board" for "Administrator" in two places and "reports to it as and when it" for "reports to him as and when he" and struck out provisions relating to the payment of an examination fee by Federal credit unions and the deposit of such fee to the credit of the special fund created by section 1755 of this title.

1970—Pub. L. 91–206 substituted "Administrator" for "Director" in three places.

1959—Pub. L. 86–354 provided for the making of reports to the Director as and when he may require.

1937—Act Dec. 6, 1937, inserted "giving due consideration to the time and expense incident to such examinations, and to the ability of Federal credit unions to pay such fees" and struck out proviso relating to conditions relieving certain unions from payment of examination fee.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–630 effective on expiration of 120 days after Nov. 10, 1978, and transitional provisions, see section 509 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 1752 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions of Farm Credit Administration and Governor thereof, generally, see notes set out under section 1751 of this title.

Functions of Governor of Farm Credit Administration under this section transferred to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1947.
§ 4.8 Mediation services and appeal of denial. ( a ) Any person who has been notified pursuant to § 4.7(h) of this part that his/her request for inspection of a record or for a copy has been denied, or who has received no response within twenty working days (or within such extended period as is permitted under § 4.7(c) of this part) after the request has been received by the Commission, may appeal the adverse determination or the failure to respond by requesting the Commission to direct that the record be made available.
( b ) The appeal request shall be in writing, shall clearly and prominently state on the envelope or subject line, or in a similarly prominent location, “FOIA Appeal”, and shall identify the record in the form in which it was originally requested.
( c ) The appeal request should be addressed to the Chief FOIA Officer and filed pursuant to 11 CFR 100.19(g).
( d ) The requestor may state facts and cite legal or other authorities as he/she deems appropriate in support of the appeal request.
( e ) For good cause shown, the Commission may disclose a record which is subject to one of the exemptions listed in § 4.5 of this part.
( f ) The Commission will make a determination with respect to any appeal within twenty days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays) after receipt of the appeal (or within such extended period as is permitted under § 4.7(c) of this part). If on appeal, the denial of the request for a record or a copy is in whole or in part upheld, the Commission shall advise the requestor of the denial and shall notify him/her of the provisions for judicial review of that determination as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4).
( g ) Because of the risk of misunderstanding inherent in oral communications, the Commission will not entertain any appeal from an alleged denial or failure to comply with an oral request. Any person who has orally requested a copy of a record that he/she believes to have been improperly denied should resubmit the request in writing as set forth in § 4.7.
( h ) The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) offers non-compulsory, non-binding mediation services to help resolve FOIA disputes as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. A requester may contact OGIS at: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001; email: *ogis@nara.gov*; telephone 202-741-5770; fax: 202-741-5769; online: *https://www.archives.gov/ogis*.
[44 FR 33368, June 8, 1979, as amended at 50 FR 50778, Dec. 12, 1985; 75 FR 31, Jan. 4, 2010; 79 FR 16663, Mar. 26, 2014; 81 FR 34863, June 1, 2016; 82 FR 60853, Dec. 26, 2017; 89 FR 213, Jan. 2, 2024; 89 FR 36587, May 2, 2024]
#### GUILFORD MILLS, INC. v. POWERS

No. 429PA89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 417

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 7 February 1990.
# C_2006310EN.01002804.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/28

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 October 2006 — Self Service Station Weghorst v Commission

(Case T-277/99) (1)

1

(2006/C 310/55)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 47, 19.2.2000.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the
Company), for the three and nine months ended September 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stewart York, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stewart York       
|Stewart York           
|Chief Executive Officer

Dated: February 8, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Terremark Worldwide, Inc. owns a minority shareholder interest    in:     Terremark Latin America de Argentina, S.A., an Argentine    sociedad anónima (Dormant)    Terremark Latin America (Brasil) Ltda, a Brazil corporation    Terremark Latin America de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican    sociedad anónima de capital variable     Terremark Worldwide is the sole shareholder of:     Terremark Federal Group Inc., a Delaware corporation     Terremark Worldwide owns 100% of:     NAP de las Americas — Madrid, S.A.     Terremark Asia is a majority shareholder of:     Terremark (Hong Kong) — Limited, a Hong Kong Corp.    (Dormant)    Terremark Federal Group owns 49% of Terre Light, LLC, a Delaware    corporation     Data Return LLC is the sole shareholder of:     digital OPS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company    Terremark UK Limited, a United Kingdom company
### [§2132. Renumbered §16132]
### §§1730f to 1730i. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–73, title IV, §407, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 363

Section 1730f, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title IV, §413, as added Dec. 22, 1974, Pub. L. 93–533, §11(b), 88 Stat. 1729, related to disclosures with respect to certain federally related mortgage loans, identity of beneficiary interest as condition for loan, and report to Board.

Section 1730g, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title IV, §414, as added Mar. 31, 1980, Pub. L. 96–221, title V, §522, 94 Stat. 165; amended Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–457, §33, 96 Stat. 2511, related to insured savings and loan associations.

Section 1730h, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title IV, §415, as added Aug. 10, 1987, Pub. L. 100–86, title IV, §402(b), 101 Stat. 606, related to accounting principles and other standards and requirements.

Section 1730i, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title IV, §416, as added Aug. 10, 1987, Pub. L. 100–86, title IV, §404(b), 101 Stat. 611, related to thrift industry recovery regulations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Any plan approved by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation under former section 1730i of this title for any State savings association to continue in effect as long as such association adheres to the plan and continues to submit to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regular and complete reports on the progress in meeting the association's goals under the plan, notwithstanding the repeal of that section, see section 302 of Pub. L. 101–73, set out as a Savings Provision note under section 1467a of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

For provisions relating to abolition of Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and Federal Home Loan Bank Board and transfer of functions, personnel, and property of such agencies, see sections 401 to 406 of Pub. L. 101–73, set out as a note under section 1437 of this title.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-155 

August 3, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(a)(2) Plans Covered. Tax Qualification by IRS Determination 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter to * * * of this Corporation regarding the application of Title IV of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") to * * * (the "Plan"). 

As I understand the facts, the Plan was established on * * * On * * * the Internal Revenue Service issued * * * (the

"Employer") a determination letter stating that the Plan met the requirements for tax qualification under § 401(a) of the

Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and the Plan's trust was exempt from income tax under § 501(a) of the Code. 

On * * * the IRS issued another determination letter to the Plan's Trustees which revoked the earlier determination

letter as of * * *, because in the Plan's trust made unsecured loans of substantially all of the trust assets to the Employer.

The Service concluded that the Plan was not operated for the exclusive benefit of the employees, a violation of § 401(a)

of the Code. 

The revocation of the prior, favorable determination letter in * * * followed an audit in * * * of the Employer's

income tax returns for tax years ending * * * The audit resulted in the Service's disallowance of [*2] the Employer's

contribution to the Plan of * * * for the tax year ending * * * The Employer apparently agreed to the disallowance, and

a letter dated * * * closing the case based on the IRS-taxpayer agreement was sent to the Employer by the Service. In

* * * IRS audited the Employer's tax years ending in * * * and * * * and found that the trust had again made an unsecured

loan to the Employer. IRS then disallowed the contribution made in * * * of * * * and the contribution made in * * *

of * * * Following the * * * audit, the plan was disqualified. 

A plan operating under a favorable determination letter from the IRS as of September 2, 1974, which subsequently

was revoked, meets § 4021(a)(2) of the Act. Section 4021(a)(2) provides that a plan which is, or has been determined

by the Secretary of the Treasury to be, a plan described in § 401(a) of the Code, or which meets or has been determined

by the Secretary of the Treasury to meet, the requirements of * * * § 404(a)(2) of the Code is subject to Title IV of the

Act. Although in * * * the employer was disallowed a deduction for his * * * contribution to the plan for the same

conduct which later resulted in the plan's disqualification, [*3] the mere disallowance of the deduction does not

constitute the * * * revocation of the plan's favorable determination letter. Moreover, for purposes of determining

whether a plan satisfies the requirements of § 4021(a)(2), it is the date of issuance, and not the effective date, of an IRS

disqualification letter that is pertinent. As of September 2, 1974 the plan was operating under a favorable qualification

letter. The letter disqualifying the plan was not issued until * * *. The Plan therefore meets § 4021(a)(2) and is subject

to Title IV of the Act. 

I hope this is of assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT
      32.1 – CEO Certification**








**SATELLIE
      NEWSPAPERS CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Newspapers Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy
      Piceni, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.






/s/
      Roy Piceni


Roy
      Piceni, CEO


And
      Chairman of the Board of Directors





May
      21,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Satellite Newspapers Corp., and will be retained by Satellite
      Newspapers Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.