10876 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Notices 

1On September 30, 2009, the Department 

received a timely request to conduct an 

administrative review of the following 32 

companies: Abhinav Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.; 

American Scholar, Inc., and/or I–Scholar; 

Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co., Ltd.; Bafna Exports; 

Cello International Pvt. Ltd (M/S Cello Paper 

Products); Creative Divya; Corporate Stationery Pvt. 

Ltd.; D.D. International; Exmart International Pvt. 

Ltd.; Fatechand Mahendrakumar; FFI International; 

Freight India Logistics Pvt. Ltd.; International 

Greetings Pvt. Ltd.; Lodha Offset Limited; Magic 

International Pvt. Ltd.; Marigold ExIm Pvt. Ltd.; 

Marisa International; Navneet Publications (India) 

Ltd.; Paperwise Inc.; Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; 

Premier Exports; Riddhi Enterprises; SAB 

International; SAR Transport Systems; Seet Kamal 

International; Solitaire Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Eternity 

Int’l Freight, forwarder on behalf of Solitaire 

Logistics Pvt. Ltd.); Sonal Printers Pvt. Ltd.; Super 

Impex; Swati Growth Funds Ltd.; V & M; and Yash 

Laminates. 

results of the administrative review of 

chlorinated isos from the PRC within 

this time limit. Specifically, due to 

additional time needed to review the 

first supplemental questionnaire 

response and to issue further 

supplemental questionnaires, we find 

that additional time is needed to 

complete these preliminary results. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is extending the time period for 

completion of the preliminary results of 

this review from 245 days to 365 days; 

from March 2, 2011 until June 30, 2011. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 22, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4397 Filed 2–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–843] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 21, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary results of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

for certain lined paper products from 

India (CLPP). See Certain Lined Paper 

Products From India: Notice of 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

64988 (October 21, 2010) (Preliminary 

Results). This review covers 31 

manufacturers and exporters of the 

subject merchandise.1 On October 26, 

2009, petitioner timely withdrew its 

request for a review of Blue Bird (India) 

Limited (Blue Bird). Therefore, we are 

rescinding this review with respect to 

Blue Bird. 

As a result of our analysis of the 

comments received, these final results 

differ from the Preliminary Results. 

For our final results, we continue to 

find that Navneet did not make sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value (NV) (i.e., sales were made at de 

minimis dumping margins). We also 

find that U.S. sales have not been made 

below NV by Super Impex. In addition, 

based on the final results for Super 

Impex, we have determined that the 29 

remaining non-selected companies will 

receive the non-selected respondent rate 

from the previous review. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 28, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Moore (Navneet) and Cindy 

Robinson (Super Impex), AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3692, (202) 482– 

3797, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 29, 2010, the Department 

selected Navneet and Super Impex as 

companies to be individually examined 

in this administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CLPP from 

India. See Memorandum to Melissa 

Skinner, Director, Office 3 Through 

James Terpstra, Program Manager, 

Office 3 from Stephanie Moore, Case 

Analyst titled ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India: Selection of 

Respondents for Individual Review’’ 

(Respondent Selection Memo), dated 

January 29, 2010. 

As stated in the Preliminary Results, 

on October 26, 2009, petitioner timely 

withdrew its request for a review of 

Blue Bird. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind 

an administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the parties that requested a 

review withdraw the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

review. The instant review was initiated 

on October 26, 2009. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, 74 FR 54956 

(October 26, 2009) (Initiation Notice). 

The petitioner’s withdrawal of request 

for a review of Blue Bird falls within the 

90-day deadline for rescission by the 

Department, and no other party 

requested an administrative review of 

this particular respondent. Therefore, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

and consistent with our practice, we are 

rescinding this review with respect to 

Blue Bird. See, e.g., Lightweight 

Thermal Paper from Germany: Notice of 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 11135 

(March 10, 2010). 

On October 21, 2010, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results. On 

October 25, 2010, petitioner submitted 

additional factual information obtained 

from the Web site http:// 

www.cellopapers.com/ruled-plainpapers.html, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.301(b)(2). 

Comments From Interested Parties 

We invited parties to comment on our 

Preliminary Results. Case briefs were 

filed on November 18, 2010, by Super 

Impex and on November 23, 2010, by 

petitioner and Navneet. On December 

13 and 14, 2010, Super Impex and 

petitioner, respectively, filed rebuttal 

briefs. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of this order includes 

certain lined paper products, typically 

school supplies (for purposes of this 

scope definition, the actual use of or 

labeling these products as school 

supplies or non-school supplies is not a 

defining characteristic) composed of or 

including paper that incorporates 

straight horizontal and/or vertical lines 

on ten or more paper sheets (there shall 

be no minimum page requirement for 

loose leaf filler paper) including but not 

limited to such products as single- and 

multi-subject notebooks, composition 

books, wireless notebooks, loose leaf or 

glued filler paper, graph paper, and 

laboratory notebooks, and with the 

smaller dimension of the paper 

measuring 6 inches to 15 inches 

(inclusive) and the larger dimension of 

the paper measuring 8-3/4 inches to 15 

inches (inclusive). Page dimensions are 

measured size (not advertised, stated, or 

‘‘tear-out’’ size), and are measured as 

they appear in the product (i.e., stitched 

and folded pages in a notebook are 

measured by the size of the page as it 

appears in the notebook page, not the 

size of the unfolded paper). However, 

for measurement purposes, pages with 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Notices 10877 

tapered or rounded edges shall be 

measured at their longest and widest 

points. Subject lined paper products 

may be loose, packaged or bound using 

any binding method (other than case 

bound through the inclusion of binders 

board, a spine strip, and cover wrap). 

Subject merchandise may or may not 

contain any combination of a front 

cover, a rear cover, and/or backing of 

any composition, regardless of the 

inclusion of images or graphics on the 

cover, backing, or paper. Subject 

merchandise is within the scope of this 

order whether or not the lined paper 

and/or cover are hole punched, drilled, 

perforated, and/or reinforced. Subject 

merchandise may contain accessory or 

informational items including but not 

limited to pockets, tabs, dividers, 

closure devices, index cards, stencils, 

protractors, writing implements, 

reference materials such as 

mathematical tables, or printed items 

such as sticker sheets or miniature 

calendars, if such items are physically 

incorporated, included with, or attached 

to the product, cover and/or backing 

thereto. 

Specifically excluded from the scope 

of this order are: 

• Unlined copy machine paper; 

• Writing pads with a backing 

(including but not limited to products 

commonly known as ‘‘tablets,’’ ‘‘note 

pads,’’ ‘‘legal pads,’’ and ‘‘quadrille 

pads’’), provided that they do not have 

a front cover (whether permanent or 

removable). This exclusion does not 

apply to such writing pads if they 

consist of hole-punched or drilled filler 

paper; 

• Three-ring or multiple-ring binders, 

or notebook organizers incorporating 

such a ring binder provided that they do 

not include subject paper; 

• Index cards; 

• Printed books and other books that 

are case bound through the inclusion of 

binders board, a spine strip, and cover 

wrap; 

• Newspapers; 

• Pictures and photographs; 

• Desk and wall calendars and 

organizers (including but not limited to 

such products generally known as 

‘‘office planners,’’ ‘‘time books,’’ and 

‘‘appointment books’’); 

• Telephone logs; 

• Address books; 

• Columnar pads & tablets, with or 

without covers, primarily suited for the 

recording of written numerical business 

data; 

• Lined business or office forms, 

including but not limited to: pre-printed 

business forms, lined invoice pads and 

paper, mailing and address labels, 

manifests, and shipping log books; 

• Lined continuous computer paper; 

• Boxed or packaged writing 

stationary (including but not limited to 

products commonly known as ‘‘fine 

business paper,’’ ‘‘parchment paper,’’ 

and ‘‘letterhead’’), whether or not 

containing a lined header or decorative 

lines; 

• Stenographic pads (‘‘steno pads’’), 

Gregg ruled (‘‘Gregg ruling’’ consists of a 

single- or double-margin vertical ruling 

line down the center of the page. For a 

six-inch by nine-inch stenographic pad, 

the ruling would be located 

approximately three inches from the left 

of the book), measuring 6 inches by 9 

inches; 

Also excluded from the scope of this 

order are the following trademarked 

products: 

• Fly TM lined paper products: A 

notebook, notebook organizer, loose or 

glued note paper, with papers that are 

printed with infrared reflective inks and 

readable only by a Fly TM pen-top 

computer. The product must bear the 

valid trademark Fly TM (products found 

to be bearing an invalidly licensed or 

used trademark are not excluded from 

the scope). 

• Zwipes TM: A notebook or notebook 

organizer made with a blended 

polyolefin writing surface as the cover 

and pocket surfaces of the notebook, 

suitable for writing using a speciallydeveloped permanent marker and erase 

system (known as a Zwipes TM pen). 

This system allows the marker portion 

to mark the writing surface with a 

permanent ink. The eraser portion of the 

marker dispenses a solvent capable of 

solubilizing the permanent ink allowing 

the ink to be removed. The product 

must bear the valid trademark 

Zwipes TM (products found to be bearing 

an invalidly licensed or used trademark 

are not excluded from the scope). 

• FiveStar ®Advance TM: A notebook 

or notebook organizer bound by a 

continuous spiral, or helical, wire and 

with plastic front and rear covers made 

of a blended polyolefin plastic material 

joined by 300 denier polyester, coated 

on the backside with PVC (poly vinyl 

chloride) coating, and extending the 

entire length of the spiral or helical 

wire. The polyolefin plastic covers are 

of specific thickness; front cover is 

0.019 inches (within normal 

manufacturing tolerances) and rear 

cover is 0.028 inches (within normal 

manufacturing tolerances). Integral with 

the stitching that attaches the polyester 

spine covering, is captured both ends of 

a 1′′ wide elastic fabric band. This band 

is located 2–3/8′′ from the top of the 

front plastic cover and provides pen or 

pencil storage. Both ends of the spiral 

wire are cut and then bent backwards to 

overlap with the previous coil but 

specifically outside the coil diameter 

but inside the polyester covering. 

During construction, the polyester 

covering is sewn to the front and rear 

covers face to face (outside to outside) 

so that when the book is closed, the 

stitching is concealed from the outside. 

Both free ends (the ends not sewn to the 

cover and back) are stitched with a 

turned edge construction. The flexible 

polyester material forms a covering over 

the spiral wire to protect it and provide 

a comfortable grip on the product. The 

product must bear the valid trademarks 

FiveStar ®Advance TM (products found 

to be bearing an invalidly licensed or 

used trademark are not excluded from 

the scope). 

• FiveStar Flex TM: A notebook, a 

notebook organizer, or binder with 

plastic polyolefin front and rear covers 

joined by 300 denier polyester spine 

cover extending the entire length of the 

spine and bound by a 3-ring plastic 

fixture. The polyolefin plastic covers are 

of a specific thickness; front cover is 

0.019 inches (within normal 

manufacturing tolerances) and rear 

cover is 0.028 inches (within normal 

manufacturing tolerances). During 

construction, the polyester covering is 

sewn to the front cover face to face 

(outside to outside) so that when the 

book is closed, the stitching is 

concealed from the outside. During 

construction, the polyester cover is 

sewn to the back cover with the outside 

of the polyester spine cover to the inside 

back cover. Both free ends (the ends not 

sewn to the cover and back) are stitched 

with a turned edge construction. Each 

ring within the fixture is comprised of 

a flexible strap portion that snaps into 

a stationary post which forms a closed 

binding ring. The ring fixture is riveted 

with six metal rivets and sewn to the 

back plastic cover and is specifically 

positioned on the outside back cover. 

The product must bear the valid 

trademark FiveStar Flex TM (products 

found to be bearing an invalidly 

licensed or used trademark are not 

excluded from the scope). 

Merchandise subject to this order is 

typically imported under headings 

4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 

4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 

4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 

4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 

4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS 

headings are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes; however, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
10878 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Notices 

2This rate is based on the margins calculated for 

those companies that were selected for individual 

review, excluding de minimis margins or margins 

based entirely on adverse facts available, in the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding. 

Period of Review 

The period of review (POR) is 

September 1, 2008, through August 31, 

2009. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this 

administrative review are addressed in 

the accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (I&D Memo), which is 

hereby adopted by this notice. A list of 

the issues which parties have raised, 

and to which we have responded in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, is 

attached to this notice as an Appendix. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

I&D Memo can be accessed directly on 

the Internet at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. 

The paper copy and electronic version 

of the I&D Memo are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on comments received from the 

interested parties, we have made the 

following company-specific changes to 

Super Impex’s margin calculation: (1) 

The Department relied solely on Blue 

Bird’s financial statement for the year 

2008–2009 submitted by Super Impex 

on July 7, 2010, to calculate the selling 

expenses and profit ratios for Super 

Impex; (2) the Department revised its 

SAS programming language by directly 

inputting a formula to derive the 

countervailing duty (CVD) offsets, rather 

than using the CVD amounts reported 

by Super Impex; and (3) the Department 

revised its SAS programming by 

including commissions as the only 

direct selling expense in the 

circumstance of sales adjustment. See 

I&D Memo and the Analysis 

Memorandum to File through James 

Terpstra, Program Manager, from Cindy 

Robinson for Super Impex Regarding 

‘‘Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India,’’ dated 

February 18, 2011, for further details. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average margins exist: 

Exporter 

Weighted average 

margin 

(percent) 

Navneet Publications 

(India) Ltd.

0.43 (de minimis) 

Super Impex .................. 0.28 (de minimis) 

Review-Specific Average Rate 

Applicable to the 29 Non-Selected 

Companies Subject to This Review: Our 

normal practice is to base this rate on 

the margins calculated for those 

companies that were selected for 

individual review, excluding de 

minimis margins or margins based 

entirely on adverse facts available. 

However, in this review, we only have 

de minimis margins for the companies 

selected for individual review. 

Accordingly, we determine that the 

most appropriate margin available for us 

to use for the non-selected companies in 

this review is the average of the 

margins, other than those which are 

zero, de minimis, or based on total facts 

available, that we found for the most 

recent period in which there were such 

margins. Therefore, the margin we have 

assigned to the 29 non-selected 

companies for the final results of this 

administrative review is 1.34 percent.2

(Certain Lined Paper Products from 

India: Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 75 FR 7563 (February 22, 2010). 

Exporter 

Weighted 

average 

margin 

(percent) 

Abhinav Paper Products Pvt. Ltd 1.34 

American Scholar, Inc. and/or I– 

Scholar .................................... 1.34 

Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co. Ltd .. 1.34 

Bafna Exports ............................. 1.34 

Cello International Pvt. Ltd. (M/S 

Cello Paper Products) ............. 1.34 

Corporate Stationary Pvt. Ltd ..... 1.34 

Creative Divya ............................ 1.34 

D.D. International ........................ 1.34 

Exmart International Pvt. Ltd ...... 1.34 

Fatechand Mahendrakumar ....... 1.34 

FFI International ......................... 1.34 

Freight India Logistics Pvt. Ltd ... 1.34 

International Greetings Pvt. Ltd .. 1.34 

Lodha Offset Limited .................. 1.34 

Magic International ..................... 1.34 

Marigold ExIm Pvt. Ltd ............... 1.34 

Marisa International .................... 1.34 

Paperwise Inc ............................. 1.34 

Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd ........ 1.34 

Premier Exports .......................... 1.34 

Riddhi Enterprises ...................... 1.34 

SAB International ........................ 1.34 

Sar Transport Systems ............... 1.34 

Seet Kamal International ............ 1.34 

Solitaire Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Eternity Int’l Freight, forwarder on 

behalf of Solitaire Logistics 

Pvt. Ltd.) .................................. 1.34 

Sonal Printers Pvt Ltd ................ 1.34 

Swati Growth Funds Ltd ............. 1.34 

V & M .......................................... 1.34 

Yash Laminates .......................... 1.34 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to these final results, the 

Department has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1), we calculated importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment 

rates based on the ratio of the total 

amount of the antidumping margins 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the examined 

sales for that importer. Where the 

assessment rate is above de minimis, we 

will instruct CBP to assess duties on all 

entries of subject merchandise by that 

importer. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties any entries for which the 

assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.50 percent). The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after publication 

of the final results of this review. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954, (May 6, 2003) (Assessment 

Policy Notice). This clarification applies 

to POR entries of subject merchandise 

produced by companies examined in 

this review (i.e., companies for which a 

dumping margin was calculated) where 

the companies did not know that their 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the 3.91 percent all-others rate 

for India if there is no company-specific 

rate for an intermediary company(ies) 

involved in the transaction. See Notice 

of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain 

Lined Paper Products from the People’s 

Republic of China; Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain 

Lined Paper Products from India, 

Indonesia and the People’s Republic of 

China; and Notice of Countervailing 

Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 

FR 56949 (September 28, 2006) (Lined 

Paper Orders). See also Assessment 

Policy Notice, 68 FR at 23954. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of 

these final results for all shipments of 

CLPP from India entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date of the final 

results of this administrative review, as 

provided by section 751(a) of the Act: 

(1) For companies covered by this 

review, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rates listed above; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies 

other than those covered by this review, 

the cash deposit rate will be the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Notices 10879 

1Petitioners consist of New World Pasta 

Company, Dakota Growers Pasta Company, and 

American Italian Pasta Company. 

company-specific rate established for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recent 

period for the manufacturer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the producer is a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the investigation, the cash deposit 

rate will be 3.91 percent, the all-others 

rate established in the less-than-fairvalue investigation. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent increase in antidumping 

duties by the amount of antidumping 

and/or countervailing duties 

reimbursed. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 18, 2011. 

Ronald K Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

APPENDIX I 

List of Comments in the Accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum 

Company-Specific Issues 

Super Impex 

Comment 1: Methodology for Calculations of 

Interest, Selling, General & 

Administrative (G&A) Expenses, and 

Profit 

Comment 2: Whether to Include Cello 

Writing Instruments & Containers Private 

Ltd. (Cello)’s Financial Data 

Comment 3: Financial Statement(s) for Use in 

Determining Constructed Value (CV) 

Selling Expenses and Profit 

Comment 4: Simple Average versus Weighted 

Average 

Comment 5: Selling Expenses and 

Circumstances of Sales (COS) 

Adjustment in a CV Scenario 

Comment 6: Calculation of Countervailing 

Duty (CVD) Adjustment 

Navneet 

Comment 7: Whether the Department Used 

the Revised Sales Databases 

Comment 8: Navneet’s Model Match SubCodes 

Comment 9: Treatment of Merchandising 

Expense 

Comment 10: Treatment of Negative 

Dumping Margins (Zeroing) 

[FR Doc. 2011–4392 Filed 2–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–818] 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Extension of 

Time Limits for the Preliminary Results 

of Fourteenth Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy 

Zhang or George McMahon, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1168 and (202) 

482–1167, respectively. 

Background 

On August 31, 2010, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published a notice of 

initiation of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

pasta from Italy, covering the period 

July 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 75 FR 53274 (August 31, 2010). 

The preliminary results of this review 

are currently due no later than April 2, 

2011. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to make a 

preliminary determination within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act further states that if it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the time period specified, the 

administering authority may extend the 

245 day period to issue its preliminary 

results by up to 120 days. 

We determine that completion of the 

preliminary results of this review within 

the 245 day period is not practicable for 

the following reasons. This review 

requires the Department to gather and 

analyze a significant amount of 

information pertaining to the company’s 

sales practices, manufacturing costs, 

corporate relationships and an 

examination of a particular market 

situation allegation filed by petitioners.1

Given the number and complexity of 

issues in this case, and in accordance 

with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we 

are extending the time period for issuing 

the preliminary results of review by 120 

days. The preliminary results will now 

be due no later than August 1, 2011, the 

first business day following 120 days 

from the current deadline. See Notice of 

Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next 

Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative 

Determination Deadlines Pursuant to 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as Amended, 70 

FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). The final 

results continue to be due 120 days after 

the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 18, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4394 Filed 2–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–848] 

Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to requests from 

interested parties, the Department of 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES