alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the
Company), for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Weldon, Chief Financial Officer and
President of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Steven Weldon      
|Steven Weldon          
|Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
### §2294. Payments on behalf of public bodies

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the purchase by the Bank of the obligations of any local public body or agency within the United States shall be made upon such terms and conditions as may be necessary to avoid an increase in borrowing costs to such local public body or agency as a result of the purchase by the Bank of its obligations. The head of the Federal agency guaranteeing such obligations, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall estimate the borrowing costs that would be incurred by the local public body or agency if its obligations were not sold to the Bank.

(b) The Federal agency guaranteeing obligations purchased by the Bank may contract to make periodic payments to the Bank which shall be sufficient to offset the costs to the Bank of purchasing obligations of local public bodies or agencies upon terms and conditions as prescribed in this section rather than as prescribed by section 2285 of this title. Such contracts may be made in advance of appropriations therefor, and appropriations for making payments under such contracts are hereby authorized.

(Pub. L. 93–224, §16, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 941.)
§ 11.6 Inspection space and facility requirements. The management of every horse show, horse exhibition, or horse sale or auction, containing Tennessee Walking Horses or racking horses, shall provide, without fee, sufficient space and facilities for APHIS representatives to carry out their duties under the Act and regulations at every horse show, horse exhibition, or horse sale or auction, containing Tennessee Walking Horses or racking horses, whether or not management has received prior notification or otherwise knows that such show may be inspected by APHIS. The management of every horse show, horse exhibition, horse sale or auction which does not contain Tennessee Walking Horses or racking horses shall provide, without fee, such sufficient space and facilities when requested to do so by APHIS representatives. With respect to such space and facilities, it shall be the responsibility of management to provide at least the following: ( a ) Sufficient space in a convenient location to the horse show, horse exhibition, or horse sale or auction arena, acceptable to the APHIS Show Veterinarian, in which horses may be physically, thermographically, or otherwise inspected.
( b ) Protection from the elements of nature, such as rain, snow, sleet, hail, windstorm, etc., if required by the APHIS Show Veterinarian.
( c ) A means to control crowds or onlookers in order that APHIS personnel may carry out their duties without interference and with a reasonable measure of safety, if requested by the APHIS Show Veterinarian.
( d ) An accessible, reliable, and convenient 110-volt electrical power source, if electrical service is available at the show, exhibition, or sale or auction site and is requested by the APHIS Show Veterinarian.
( e ) An appropriate area adjacent to the inspection area for designated horses to wait for inspection, and an area to be used for detention of horses.
[44 FR 25181, Apr. 27, 1979, as amended at 56 FR 13750, Apr. 4, 1991]
# C_2007095EN.01002001.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/20

---

Action brought on 12 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-75/07)

(2007/C 95/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/82/EC on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive;
  in the alternative:
  declare that, by failing to communicate to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/82/EC on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/82/EC on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive;

1

in the alternative:

declare that, by failing to communicate to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/82/EC on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive;

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2004/28/EC expired on 30 October 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 136, p. 58.

1

---
# C_2006326EN.01002803.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/28

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 16 October 2006 — Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Part Service Srl, in liquidation

(Case C-425/06)

(2006/C 326/59)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

La Corte Suprema di Cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze

Applicant:

Defendant: Part Service Srl, in liquidation

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the concept of abuse of rights, defined in the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-255/02 as transactions, the essential aim of which is to obtain a tax advantage, correspond to the definition transactions carried out for no commercial reasons other than a tax advantage, or is it broader or more restrictive than that definition? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the concept of abuse of rights, defined in the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-255/02 as transactions, the essential aim of which is to obtain a tax advantage, correspond to the definition transactions carried out for no commercial reasons other than a tax advantage, or is it broader or more restrictive than that definition?

transactions, the essential aim of which is to obtain a tax advantage,

transactions carried out for no commercial reasons other than a tax advantage,

| 2. | For the purposes of VAT, may there be considered to be an abuse of rights (or of legal forms), with the consequent loss of Community own revenue accruing from value added tax, where contracts for leasing arrangements (locazione finanziaria), financing, insurance and intermediation contracts are concluded separately with the effect that only the consideration paid in respect of the grant of the right to use the goods is subject to VAT, whereas a single contract of leasing in accordance with the practice and interpretation of national case-law would include the financing and would therefore make the whole of the consideration subject to VAT? |
| --- | --- |

2.

For the purposes of VAT, may there be considered to be an abuse of rights (or of legal forms), with the consequent loss of Community own revenue accruing from value added tax, where contracts for leasing arrangements (locazione finanziaria), financing, insurance and intermediation contracts are concluded separately with the effect that only the consideration paid in respect of the grant of the right to use the goods is subject to VAT, whereas a single contract of leasing in accordance with the practice and interpretation of national case-law would include the financing and would therefore make the whole of the consideration subject to VAT?

locazione finanziaria

---
Exhibit 10.38  THE
  STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRECHAIRMAN
  Thomas B. Getz
  COMMISSIONERS
  Graham J. Morrison
  Clifton C. Below
  
  Tel. (603) 271-2431
  FAX (603) 271-3878
  
  TDD Access: Relay NH
  1-800-735-2964EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
  AND SECRETARY
  Debra A. Howland
  PUBLIC
  UTILITIES COMMISSION21 S. Fruit
  Street, Suite 10
  Concord, N.H. 03301-2429
  Website:
  www.puc.nh.govMay 12, 2009
  Shirley J. Linn, Esq.
Executive Vice President and General Counsel 
FairPoint Communications, Inc.
521 East Morehead Street
Suite 500 
Charlotte, NC 28202  Re:  Amendment to March 31, 2009 Plan for
Utilization of $50,000,000 Set Aside  Dear Ms. Linn:  This letter is to
advise you that the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission has reviewed
FairPoints request for amendment of its March 31, 2009 plan.  Consistent with Section 2.5.3 of the
Settlement Agreement approved by Commission Order No. 24,823, the
Commission has approved your request to use those funds for general working
capital purposes such as operating expenses and capital expenditures.  The Commissions approval is conditioned on
FairPoints commitment to invest additional funds in Commission-approved New
Hampshire projects as follows:  $15,000,000 to be spent by December 31, 2010 
$20,000,000 to be spent by December 31, 2011
$30,000,000 to be spent by December 31, 2012  The Commission has
determined, in light of FairPoints recent filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, that allowing FairPoint to use the $50,000,000 for general
working capital at this time is reasonable in order to improve the Companys
liquidity.  Furthermore, the Commission
has concluded that FairPoints commitment to increase capital expenditures in
New Hampshire is appropriate under the circumstances.  Very truly yours,/s/ F. Anne RossF. Anne Ross, Esq.General Counsel
# C_2007082EN.01002704.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 December 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-93/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/54)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.

1

---
§ 226.27 Gas for operating purposes and tribal use. ( a ) *Gas to be furnished oil lessee.* Lessee of a producing gas lease shall furnish the oil lessee sufficient gas for operating purposes at a rate to be agreed upon, or on failure to agree the rate shall be determined by the Superintendent: *Provided,* That the oil lessee shall at his own expense and risk, furnish and install the necessary connections to the gas lessee's well or pipeline. All such connections shall be reported in writing to the Superintendent.
( b ) *Use of gas by Osage Tribe.* ( 1 ) Gas from any well or wells shall be furnished any Tribal-owned building or enterprise at a rate not to exceed the price less royalty being received or offered by a gas purchaser: *Provided,* That such requirement shall be subject to the determination by the Superintendent that gas in sufficient quantities is available above that needed for lease operation and that no waste would result. In the absence of a gas purchaser the rate to be paid by the Osage Tribe shall be determined by the Superintendent based on prices being paid by purchasers in the Osage Mineral Estate. The Osage Tribe is to furnish all necessary material and labor for such connection with Lessee's gas system. The use of such gas shall be at the risk of the Osage Tribe at all times.
( 2 ) Any member of the Osage Tribe residing in Osage County and outside a corporate city is entitled to the use at his own expense of not to exceed 400,000 cubic feet of gas per calendar year for his principal residence at a rate not to exceed the amount paid by a gas purchaser plus 10 percent: *Provided,* That such requirement shall be subject to the determination by the Superintendent that gas in sufficient quantities is available above that needed for lease operation and that no waste would result. In the absence of a gas purchaser the amount to be paid by the Tribal member shall be determined by the Superintendent. Gas to Tribal members is not royalty free. The Tribal member is to furnish all necessary material and labor for such connection to Lessee's gas system, and shall maintain his own lines. The use of such gas shall be at the risk of the Tribal member at all times.
( 3 ) Gas furnished by Lessee under paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section may be terminated only with the approval of the Superintendent. Written application for termination must be made to the Superintendent showing justification.
EXHIBIT 21




AFFYMETRIX, INC.


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES





Affymetrix, UK Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in the United Kingdom and doing business under such name.





Affymetrix France S.A.S., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in France and doing business under such name.





Affymetrix GmbH, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Germany and doing business under such name.





Affymetrix Japan K.K., a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Japan and doing business under such name.





Affymetrix Pte Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Singapore and doing business under such name.





Affymetrix Italia, SRL, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Italy and doing business under such name.





Affymetrix Biotech Shanghai Ltd., incorporated in China and doing business under such name.





Anatrace, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Ohio and doing business under such name.





Panomics, L.L.C., wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in California and doing business under such name.





Panomics SRL, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Italy and doing business under such name.





USB Corporation, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Ohio and doing business under such name.





USB Europe, GmbH, wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Germany and doing business under such name.
### §1748i. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 28, 1951, ch. 434, title V, §505, 65 Stat. 365, related to appropriation and expenditure of funds for acquisition of land, installation of outside utilities, and site preparation for housing projects constructed under this subchapter.
#### § 583.2 Who may appeal the approval or disapproval of a management contract or amendment to a management contract?

Only a party to the management contract or amendment thereto approved or disapproved by the Chair may appeal.
#### § 36.75 What qualifications must homeliving staff possess?

(a) Homeliving staff must possess the qualifications shown in the following table:

| Position | Required training |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Homeliving Supervisor | Must be qualified based on size and complexity of the school, but at minimum possess a bachelor's degree. |
| (2) Homeliving Manager | Must be qualified based on the size and complexity of the student body but must at a minimum have an associate's degree no later than 2008. |
| (3) Homeliving Program Staff | Must have at least 32 post-secondary semester hours (or 48 quarter hours) in an applicable academic discipline, including fields related to working with children, such as, child development, education, behavioral sciences and cultural studies. |

(b) A person employed as a homeliving program staff:

(1) Should meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section by the 2009-2010 school year; and

(2) May, upon showing good cause, petition the school supervisor (or the homeliving supervisor for peripheral dorms) for a waiver from the new qualifications.
#### Dressler v. Pannell

*Randall E. Zimmerman,*for plaintiffs.

*Linus Fenicle,*for defendants.

April 26, 1993

REHKAMP, *J.,*

One of the issues for my consideration is the question of whether or not an attomey/client relationship has been established between Randall Zimmerman, Esq., and defendants, more specifically, Robert T. Pannell n, by virtue of a phone conversation initiated by Mr. Pannell to Randall Zimmerman sometime previous to the institution of the present proceedings. During that phone conversation, *103Mr. Pannell related certain factual information to Mr. Zimmerman and, according to his testimony, Mr. Zimmerman agreed to represent him in this matter if it went to court. However, Mr. Zimmerman advised him that certain steps should be taken, including a title search, before the matter should be considered to be taken to court. Subsequent thereto, Mr. Zimmerman was contacted by plaintiffs and he then wrote a letter to Mr. Pannell indicating that he would be representing plaintiffs in this action. No fee or compensation was paid to Mr. Zimmerman by Mr. Pannell, although Mr. Pannell indicates that he asked if he should pay a retainer which Mr. Zimmerman declined at that time.

According to a letter attached to plaintiffs’ complaint and marked Exhibit “C,” Mr. Zimmerman indicates that he had a telephone conversation with Mr. Pannell back in October 1991 and the letter was dated November 24, 1992. In said letter, Mr. Zimmerman indicates that he has not spoken with Mr. Pannell since that brief phone conversation and does not represent him.

It is clear from the correspondence from Mr. Zimmerman that he did not feel that an attomey/client relationship had been established by the brief telephone conversation. On the other hand, Mr. Pannell testified that he felt that there was an attomey/client privilege and he was shocked and surprised at the November 24, 1992 letter and responded with a phone call to Mr. Zimmerman at home expressing his displeasure. In its research, the court has determined that a payment of a retainer is not required to establish an attomey/client privilege which would invoke the Canons of Professional Ethics outlined in defendants’ memorandum to the court. However, this court is mindful of the telephone contacts that occur by people *104in a rural area where local attorneys are consulted over the phone for no fee and in many cases that is the extent of the contact.

This court is satisfied that no attomey/client privilege exists under the limited context of this case and therefore Mr. Zimmerman is not disqualified from this case from representing the plaintiffs.

On the issue of preliminary injunction, this court is not prepared to make a decision on that issue until other parties have been joined in this matter and state their interest of record. Therefore, a decision is deferred until plaintiffs have joined additional defendants who own land along the abandoned public road which would provide an alternate access to plaintiffs’ property.
### §§2216 to 2216k. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–233, title II, §207(a)(3), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1607

Section 2216, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28A, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1680, provided for chartering of Farm Credit System Capital Corporation by Farm Credit Administration and revoked charter of Farm Credit System Capital Corporation which had been issued under part D of this subchapter.

Section 2216a, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28B, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1680, set out purposes of Capital Corporation.

Section 2216b, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28C, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1680, provided for Board of Directors of Capital Corporation.

Section 2216c, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28D, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1682, provided for compensation of members of Board of Directors of Capital Corporation.

Section 2216d, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28E, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1682, authorized Board of Directors of Capital Corporation to adopt rules.

Section 2216e, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28F, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1682, provided for selection of chief executive officer of Capital Corporation.

Section 2216f, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28G, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1682, enumerated corporate powers of Capital Corporation.

Section 2216g, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28H, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1685, provided for succession of Capital Corporation.

Section 2216h, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28I, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1685, set out provisions limiting powers of Capital Corporation.

Section 2216i, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28J, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1686, set out authority of Secretary of the Treasury.

Section 2216j, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28K, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1687, provided for initial capitalization of Capital Corporation.

Section 2216k, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.28L, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1687, provided for tax status of consolidated obligations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 15 days after Jan. 6, 1988, see section 207(b) of Pub. L. 100–233, set out as a note under section 2152 of this title.