alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:           |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|August 22, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-1

                          CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                 ----------------------------------------------------
                                                   1999       1998       1997       1996       1995
                                                 --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                              <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Available earnings:
  Net income...................................  $48,760    $32,248    $27,260    $14,941    $ 8,212
  Add interest expense (1).....................   21,859     15,476     10,871     10,992     12,985
                                                 -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
Available earnings (2).........................  $70,619    $47,724    $38,131    $25,933    $21,197
                                                 =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense.............................  $21,859    $15,476    $10,871    $10,992    $12,985
  Capitalized interest.........................    1,926      2,214        893        142         20
                                                 -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
Total fixed charges............................  $23,785    $17,690    $11,764    $11,134    $13,005
                                                 =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.............     2.97       2.70       3.24       2.33       1.63
                                                 =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>

------------------------

NOTES:

(1) Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing costs.

(2) Interest portion of rental expense is not calculated because annual rental
    expense for the Company is not significant.

                                      F-36
### §211. Rules and regulations

#### (a) In general

The Comptroller of the Currency may prescribe such rules and regulations as the Comptroller may deem necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act.

#### (b) F.D.I.C. as conservator

In any case in which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is the conservator, any rules or regulations prescribed by the Comptroller shall be consistent with any rules and regulations prescribed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act [12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.].

(Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, title II, §211, 48 Stat. 5; Pub. L. 101–73, title VIII, §807, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 446.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, 48 Stat. 1, popularly known as the Emergency Banking and Bank Conservation Act, which is classified to sections 51a, 51b, 51c, 51d, 95, 201 to 212, 248, 347b, 347c, 347d, and 445 of this title and section 4305 of Title 50, War and National Defense, and classified as a note under section 4305 of Title 50.

Section 51d of this title was repealed by act June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title II, §206(b), (o), 61 Stat. 208. For effect of the repeal on outstanding debentures held by banks, see References in Text note set out under section 51b–1 of this title.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 967, §2, 64 Stat. 873, which is classified generally to chapter 16 (§1811 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1811 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Comptroller of the Currency is authorized and empowered, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, to prescribe such rules and regulations as he may deem necessary in order to carry out the provisions of this subchapter. Whoever violates any rule or regulation made pursuant to this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exception as to Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by any provision of law in Comptroller of the Currency, referred to in this section, not included in transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 1 of this title.
§ 111.55 Interest, penalties, and administrative costs. ( a ) The Commission shall assess interest, penalties, and administrative costs on debts owed to the United States Government, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717. Interest, penalties, and administrative costs will be assessed in accordance with 31 CFR 901.9.
( b ) The Commission shall waive collection of interest and administrative costs on a debt or any portion of the debt that is paid within thirty days after the date on which the interest begins to accrue.
( c ) The Commission may waive collection of interest, penalties, and administrative costs if it: ( 1 ) Determines that collection is against equity and good conscience or not in the best interest of the United States, including when an administrative offset or installment agreement is in effect; or
( 2 ) Determines that waiver is appropriate under the criteria for compromise of debts set forth at 31 CFR 902.2(a).
( d ) The Commission is authorized to impose interest and related charges on debts not subject to 31 U.S.C. 3717, in accordance with common law.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of LiquidGolf
Holding Corporation (the "COMPANY"), for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "REPORT"), I, Dwain Brannon, Chief Executive Officer & President of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
780(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Dwain Brannon
---------------------------------------
Dwain Brannon
Chief Executive Officer & President

Dated: August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to LiquidGolf Holding Corporation and will be retained by LiquidGolf
Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### § 102.10 Disbursement by check (52 U.S.C. 30102 (h)(1)).

All disbursements by a political committee, except for disbursements from the petty cash fund under 11 CFR 102.11, shall be made by check or similar draft, including electronic transfer, from account(s) established at the committee's campaign depository or depositories under 11 CFR part 103.

[45 FR 15104, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 89 FR 215, Jan. 2, 2024]
# C_2006331EN.01004902.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/49

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2006 — Suhadolnik v Court of Justice

(Case F-78/06) (1)

1

(Officials - Recruitment - Appointment - Probationary period - Probationer - Establishment - Grading by grade and step - Transitional measures of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Admissibility the action)

(2006/C 331/110)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Simona Suhadolnik (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Jaume, and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities (represented by: M. Schauss, Agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Arpio and I. Sulce, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Firstly, annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice of 22 July 2005 establishing the applicant and fixing her grade in accordance with Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations and her step in accordance with the new version of Article 32 of the Staff Regulations and, secondly, a request for reclassification and a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 17.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12136-12137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4856]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Science Board; Notice of Delegation of Authority

    In accordance with Section 1863(e)(2) of the National Science 
Foundation Act, as amended, the National Science Board (Board) hereby 
gives notice in regards to a delegation of authority provided to the 
Director, National Science Foundation (NSF), as follows:
    Per resolution adopted unanimously at the National Science Board 
meeting on February 16, 2011, the Board revised its earlier award-
approval delegation to the NSF Director by increasing the award 
threshold requiring Board

[[Page 12137]]

approval from ``1 percent or more of the awarding Directorate's or 
Office's prior year current plan or $3 million--whichever is 
greater''--to the greater of either 1 percent or more of the awarding 
Directorate's or Office's prior year current plan or 0.1 percent or 
more of the prior year total NSF budget.
    The Board also added a provision to the delegation to highlight 
existing NSF policy requiring the NSF Director to make no award from 
the Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) 
account without the prior approval of the Board, as required by law.
    Finally, the Board clarified a previous delegation by making clear 
that in the case of procurements requiring Board approval, when the 
Board approves or authorizes the Director to make an award and no 
amount is specified in the Board resolution, the Director may 
subsequently amend the award to change the expiration date of the award 
and/or to commit additional sums not to exceed the lesser of 10 million 
dollars or 20 percent of the contract ceiling award amount.
    Point of contact is: Jennie Moehlmann, National Science Board 
Office, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-
7000.

Daniel A. Lauretano,
Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-4856 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### § 20.103 Have the information collection requirements in this part been approved by the Office of Management and Budget?

The information collection requirements contained in §§ 20.300, 20.400, and 20.500 were submitted for clearance to the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 35d *et seq.* This information collection was approved by OMB with OMB Control #1076-0017. The expiration date is on the form. The information is collected to determine applicant eligibility for services. The information will be used to determine applicant eligibility and to insure uniformity of services. Response is required to obtain a benefit. The public reporting burdens for this form are estimated to average 15 minutes per response including time for reviewing the instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form.
#### § 111.30 When will subpart B apply?

Subpart B applies to violations of the reporting requirements of 52 U.S.C. 30104(a) committed by political committees and their treasurers that relate to the reporting periods that begin on or after July 14, 2000, and that end on or before the date specified by 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C)(v). This subpart, however, does not apply to reports that relate to reporting periods that end between January 1, 2014, and January 21, 2014.

[79 FR 3303, Jan. 21, 2014, as amended at 79 FR 77848, Dec. 29, 2014]
H. Res. 373

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 10, 1999.

Resolved, That immediately following his resignation as

Chaplain of the House of Representatives and in recognition

of the length of his devoted service to the House, Reverend

James David Ford be, and he is hereby, appointed Chaplain

emeritus of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2007095EN.01003602.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/36

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2007 — Katalagarianakis v Commission

(Case T-402/03) (1)

1

(Officials - Appointment - Review of classification in grade and step - Application of the Court's case-law - Articles 5 and 31(2), the second paragraph of Article 32 and Articles 45 and 62 of the Staff Regulations)

(2007/C 95/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Georgios Katalagarianakis (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision reviewing and fixing the applicant's classification at recruitment at Grade A6, first step, reviewing and fixing his subsequent classification at Grade A5, third step, on 1 April 2000 and fixing the starting point of its pecuniary effects at 5 October 1995.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Commission's decision of 14 April 2003 in so far as it fixes the starting point of its pecuniary effects at 5 October 1995. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Commission's decision of 14 April 2003 in so far as it fixes the starting point of its pecuniary effects at 5 October 1995.

| 2. | Rules that the Commission is to undertake a comparative examination of the applicant's merits and those of the officials promoted to Grade A5 in each promotion year since 1 May 1993. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Rules that the Commission is to undertake a comparative examination of the applicant's merits and those of the officials promoted to Grade A5 in each promotion year since 1 May 1993.

| 3. | Following that examination and if the Commission should be unable to award the applicant such promotion in grade as may appear justified, invites the parties to seek agreement as to appropriate compensation. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Following that examination and if the Commission should be unable to award the applicant such promotion in grade as may appear justified, invites the parties to seek agreement as to appropriate compensation.

| 4. | Rules that the parties are to inform the Court within three months of the delivery of this judgment of the content of any agreement they may have reached, failing which, of their conclusions, with figures, as to the assessment of the loss sustained. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Rules that the parties are to inform the Court within three months of the delivery of this judgment of the content of any agreement they may have reached, failing which, of their conclusions, with figures, as to the assessment of the loss sustained.

| 5. | Dismisses the remainder of the action. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Dismisses the remainder of the action.

| 6. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 35 of 7.2.2004.

1

---
#### §§ 89.1-89.26 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of the Application of Cranford Company, Appellant, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus. John H. O’Brien, as Commissioner of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity of the City of New York, and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Noopinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller-, JJ., concurred.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ELIANA NOEL
, Defendant Below, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE
,
Plaintiff Below
, Appellee. § § No. 245, 2015 § § § Court Below

— Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, § in and for New Castle County, § Cr. ID No. 1 30 6002361 § § §

Submitted: August 18 , 2015 Decided: September 1 , 2015

ORDER

This 1 st day of September 2015 , it appears to the Court that :
(1) On May 15, 2015 , the appellant filed a notice of appeal from a April

16, 2015 Superior Court order sentencing her for a violation of probation. The
appellant’s opening brief and appendix were due on or before July 6, 2015

. (2) On July 9, 2015 , the Chief Deputy Clerk sen t a notice of brief
delinquency to the appellant. On July 20, 2015 , the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a
Supreme Court Rule 29(b) notice , by certified mail, directing the appellant to show
cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for her failure to file a n opening
brief and appendix and for h er failure to pay the required filing fee

. On August 5,

2015
, t he certified notice to show cause was returned in an envelope marked
“Return to Sender, Not Deliverable Address , Unable to Forward.” The notice to2

show cause was sent again, by first class mail
, to the address on record with the
Department of Correction
, o n August 5, 2015

. (3) The appellant has failed to respond to the notice show cau se and still
has not filed an opening brief or paid the required filing fe e . Under these
circumstances, dismissal of this appeal is deemed to be unopposed

. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court

Rule s 3(b)(2) and 29 (b) , that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:
/ s / L e o E

. S t r i n e , J r

. Chief Justice
#### § 100.15 Political party (52 U.S.C. 30101(16)).

*Political party* means an association, committee, or organization which nominates or selects a candidate for election to any Federal office, whose name appears on an election ballot as the candidate of the association, committee, or organization.
### §8877. Accounts of clerks of district courts

(a) The clerk of each district court, for the purpose of the final decree in each prize cause, shall keep account of—

(1) the amount deposited with the Treasurer or public depositary, subject to the order of the court in the cause; and

(2) the amounts ordered to be paid therefrom as costs and charges.

(b) The clerk shall draw the orders of the court for the payment of costs and allowances and for the disposition of the residue of the prize fund in each cause.

(c) The clerk shall send to the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of the Navy—

(1) copies of final decrees in prize causes; and

(2) a semi-annual statement of the amounts allowed by the court, and ordered to be paid, within the preceding six months to the prize commissioners and special prize commissioners for their services.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 482, §7677; renumbered §8877, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7677 | 34 U.S.C. 1152. | R.S. 4644. |

34 U.S.C. 1152 and this section reflect modifications of R.S. 4644 effected by—

(1) Act of May 28, 1896, ch. 252, §6, 29 Stat. 179, which provided for fixed annual salaries for United States attorneys and marshals;

(2) Act of March 3, 1899, ch. 413, §13, 30 Stat. 1007, which repealed all laws authorizing distribution of prize proceeds to captors;

(3) Act of February 26, 1919, ch. 49, §1, 40 Stat. 1182, which provided that clerks of United States district courts should receive fixed annual salaries; and

(4) Act of May 29, 1920, ch. 214, 41 Stat. 654, which abolished the offices of assistant treasurers and distributed their functions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7677 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.