alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2219b. Application of uninsured accounts

#### (a) In general

Money of a borrower held by a Farm Credit System institution in an uninsured voluntary or involuntary account as authorized under regulations issued by the Farm Credit Administration (as in effect immediately before January 6, 1988), including all such other accounts known as "advanced payment accounts" or "future prepayment accounts" shall, in the event the institution is placed in liquidation, be immediately applied as payment against the indebtedness of any outstanding loans of such borrower.

#### (b) Regulations

The Farm Credit Administration shall promulgate regulations—

(1) that define the term "uninsured voluntary or involuntary account"; and

(2) to otherwise effectively carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.37, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title I, §110, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1585.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 4.37 of Pub. L. 92–181 was renumbered section 4.38 and is classified to section 2219c of this title.
### Discounts and Loans
# C_2007096EN.01002102.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/21

---

Order of the Court of 13 March 2007 — Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA, Cray Valley Iberica SA, v Commission of the European Communities, Republic of Finland

(Case C-150/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Directive 67/548/EEC - Refusal to declassify rosin as a dangerous substance - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - Breach of the right to an effective legal remedy - Action for damages - Appeal clearly unfounded)

(2007/C 96/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA, Cray Valley Iberica SA (represented by: C. Mereu and K. van Maldegem, avocats)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis and F. Simonetti, Agents), Republic of Finland

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2005 in Case T-369/03 Arizona Chemical and Others v Commission, in which the Court of First Instance declared inadmissible an action for annulment of Commission Decision D(2003)430245 of 20 August 2003, rejecting the applicant's request to withdraw rosin from the list of dangerous substances set out in Annex I to Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ L 196, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA and Cray Valley Iberica SA shall bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA and Cray Valley Iberica SA shall bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

1

---
# C_2007019EN.01000101.xml

| 27.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 January 2007

(2007/C 19/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2901 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,71 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4542 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,65825 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0835 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6184 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,99 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1935 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5785 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,125 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,99 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6970 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9243 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4110 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 35,225 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8448 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6684 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5255 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0745 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8566 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9843 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 213,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3785 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0316 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3808 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 765,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5173 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,318 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2840 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,057 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2901

JPY

Japanese yen

156,71

DKK

Danish krone

7,4542

GBP

Pound sterling

0,65825

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0835

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6184

ISK

Iceland króna

89,99

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1935

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5785

CZK

Czech koruna

28,125

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,99

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6970

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9243

RON

Romanian leu

3,4110

SKK

Slovak koruna

35,225

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8448

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6684

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5255

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0745

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8566

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9843

KRW

South Korean won

1 213,53

ZAR

South African rand

9,3785

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0316

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3808

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 765,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5173

PHP

Philippine peso

63,318

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2840

THB

Thai baht

43,057

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 100.56 Office building or facility for national party committees.

A gift, subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value to a national party committee for the purchase or construction of an office building or facility is a contribution.
Exhibit 32.1

                                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Net Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
H. Watson, Jr., Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ James H. Watson, Jr.
-----------------------------------------
James H. Watson, Jr.
Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Registrant
July 28, 2005
# In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

JUNE 3, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED99590 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN KING, APP

2. ED99723 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SANTANA BALL, APP

3. ED99947 CHAVEZ FOSTER, APP V STATE OF MIS SOURI, RES

4. ED100112 DAVID ATER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

5. ED100175 QUINTIN C. GRAY, SR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

6. ED100261 GEORGE M. KNIEST, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

7. ED100358 STEVEN E. MURPHY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

8. ED100389 BRANDON T. LEE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

9. ED100611 ARLANDO VAIL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

CORRECTION(S):

1

. ED100114 STEV E HIBBS, APP V. BRIAN BERGER, ET AL, RES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-13-00485-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 31,585

Style: In re Eldridge McKnight, Jr.

Date motion filed*: August 6, 2013

Type of motion: Motion for suspension of rules

Party filing motion: Relator

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of 

Date: August 12, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its 
intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The 
purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The 
agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation 
may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The 
majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being 
reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the 
agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.
    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an 
individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a 
notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of 
the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the 
proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on 
changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site:  
http://www.nsf.gov This information may also be requested by 
telephoning, 703/292-8182.

    Dated: March 1, 2011.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-4934 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
{"agency":"PRC","generated":"2020-07-14 13:21:19","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2020"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["PRC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["8"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["8"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2020","quarter":"Q3"}
### §5236. Exchange Stabilization Fund reimbursement

#### (a) Reimbursement

The Secretary shall reimburse the Exchange Stabilization Fund established under section 5302 of title 31 for any funds that are used for the Treasury Money Market Funds Guaranty Program for the United States money market mutual fund industry, from funds under this chapter.

#### (b) Limits on use of Exchange Stabilization Fund

The Secretary is prohibited from using the Exchange Stabilization Fund for the establishment of any future guaranty programs for the United States money market mutual fund industry.

(Pub. L. 110–343, div. A, title I, §131, Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3797.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act" and was translated as reading "this division", meaning div. A of Pub. L. 110–343, Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3765, known as the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. For complete classification of division A to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5201 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Non-Applicability of Restrictions on ESF During National Emergency

Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title IV, §4015, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 481, provided that:

"(a) In General.—Section 131 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5236) shall not apply during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 27, 2020] and ending on December 31, 2020. Any guarantee established as a result of the application of subsection (a) shall—

"(1) be limited to a guarantee of the total value of a shareholder's account in a participating fund as of the close of business on the day before the announcement of the guarantee; and

"(2) terminate not later than December 31, 2020.

"(b) Direct Appropriation.—Upon the expiration of the period described in subsection (a), there is appropriated, out of amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may be necessary to reimburse the fund established under section 5302(a)(1) of title 31, United States Code, for any funds that are used for the Treasury Money Market Funds Guaranty Program for the United States money market mutual fund industry to the extent a claim payment made exceeds the balance of fees collected by the fund."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS, AND
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AS OF AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 SHOWN ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         959,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,277,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                   543,387
<INVENTORY>                                  9,581,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,995,396
<PP&E>                                       4,023,101
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,207,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,197,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,930,089
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,002
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,574,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,197,606
<SALES>                                     38,386,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,386,650
<CGS>                                       25,766,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,497,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               255,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,201,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (570,733)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (570,733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (570,733)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
# C_2006313EN.01002501.xml

| 20.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/25

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4440 — GE/Disko/ASL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 313/11)

On 12 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4440. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4440. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
Filed 2/20/24 P. v. S.E. CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions 

not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion 

has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

S.E.,

Defendant and Appellant.

 B330149

 (Los Angeles County

 Super. Ct. No. 

 SJ0011A)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los 

Angeles County, Susan Ser, Judge. Affirmed.

Sarah M. Javaheri, under appointment by the Court of 

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance by Respondent.
2

After a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court 

sustained a wardship petition against then-minor S.E. pursuant 

to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, subdivision (a). In 

an order dated May 17, 2023, the court found true beyond a 

reasonable doubt the allegation that S.E. committed 

misdemeanor assault by means of force likely to produce great 

bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4).) The court placed 

S.E. home on probation and ordered certain terms and conditions 

of probation.

S.E. timely appealed the findings and order of the court. 

We appointed counsel. After reviewing the record, counsel filed 

an opening brief asking this court to review the record 

independently pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 

441 (Wende). On January 10, 2024, we advised S.E. that she had 

30 days to submit any contentions or issues she wished us to 

consider. No response has been received to date.

We have examined the entire record. We are satisfied no 

arguable issues exist and that S.E.’s counsel has fully satisfied 

her responsibilities under Wende. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 

U.S. 259, 279–284; Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.) 
3

DISPOSITION

The juvenile court’s May 17, 2023 order is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

MOOR, J.

WE CONCUR:

BAKER, Acting P. J. 

LEE, J.

 Judge of the San Bernardino Superior Court, assigned by 

the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the 

California Constitution.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C7, Commercial Mortgage Certificates, Series 2012-C7

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 25, 2016

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.