alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006326EN.01004901.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/49

---

Action brought on 24 November 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-482/06)

(2006/C 326/100)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Montaguti and G. Braga da Cruz, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | a declaration that, by failing to adopt (all) the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the European Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

a declaration that, by failing to adopt (all) the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the European Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of that directive;

1

| — | an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 1 July 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 345, p. 90.

1

---
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Civil Rights 

# In This Section

                      -  Employee Services                          -  Overview 
                        -  Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) 
                        -  Minority Serving Institutions Program 
                        -  No FEAR Act 
                        -  Special Emphasis Programs 
                      -  Public Services                          -  Overview 
                        -  Small Business Utilization in Federal Projects 
                        -  Environmental Justice 
                        -  Limited English Proficiency 
                      -  Grant Recipient Information 
                      -  PHMSA Office of Civil Rights 

# EO 13990

EO 13990 Public Health.pdf (230.67 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          19,411
<SECURITIES>                                     8,840
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                        44
<INVENTORY>                                        207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,723
<PP&E>                                           3,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                     409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,616
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           167
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,961
<SALES>                                         11,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,504
<CGS>                                            9,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.74)
        

</TABLE>
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 20

- 12852

____________________

In re: LYNN ANN MARTIN,

Debtor.

___________________________________________________ LYNN ANN MARTIN
, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus PHILIP MARTIN,

Defendant

- Appellee. USCA11 Case: 20-12852 Date Filed: 10/08/2021 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 20

- 12852

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 0:19

- cv

- 60651

- RAR

____________________
Before W ILSON , R OSENBAUM , and H ULL , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Appellant Lynn Ann Martin appeals the district court ’ s affirmance of the bankruptcy court ’ s order den ying her motion for relief from the automatic stay (“Motion for Relief from Stay”), pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § § 362(b)(2 )(A)(iv) and 541(c )(2). After careful review of the briefs and the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 20-12852 Date Filed: 10/08/2021 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Columbus   McKinnon
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Timothy T.  Tevens,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  February 12, 2003



                                                /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                                ----------------------
                                                Timothy T. Tevens,
                                                Chief Executive Officer
# C_2007064EN.01001701.xml

| 20.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/17

---

Notice on community guides to good practice

(2007/C 64/04)

In accordance with the outcome of the assessment carried out at the meeting of 29 January 2007, the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health agreed on the publication of the titles and references of the following Community guides to good practice, pursuant to Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 laying down requirements for feed hygiene:

Title: Community guide to good practice for the EU industrial compound feed and premixtures manufacturing sector for food-producing animals — European Feed Manufacturers Guide

Author: FEFAC — Fédération Européenne des Fabricants d'Aliments Composés, Europäischer Verband der Mischfutterindustrie, European Feed Manufacturers' Federation: www.fefac.org

Edition: January 2007. The text only exists in English.

Title: Community guide to good practice for feed additive and premixture operators

Author: FAMI-QS — European Association for Feed Additives and Premixtures Quality System: www.fami-qs.org

Edition: Version 2, 17 January 2007. The text only exists in English.

Title: Guide to good practice for the manufacture of safe pet foods

Author: FEDIAF — Fédération Européenne de l'Industrie des Aliments pour Animaux Familiers, European Pet Food Industry Federation: www.fediaf.org

Edition: Revision, 8 November 2006. The text only exists in English.

---
be an alcohol-free mother-to-be.

help your family member or friend

Tips for Men

How to
Find a quiet place to sit and talk about having a healthy baby. Discuss eating

right and getting exercise.

Remind her that, while she’s pregnant, her baby drinks what she drinks.Any alcohol she drinks goes into her bloodstream and crosses theplacenta, passing to her unborn child through the umbilical cord.In fact, because babies can’t process alcohol, their blood alcoholconcentration is higher than their mother’s.If she drinks a glass of beer, wine, or a wine cooler, it’s as risky as drinkinga mixed drink or cocktail with hard liquor.There is no safe time, no safe amount, and no safe type of alcohol todrink while pregnant. Help her make the safe choice to not drink at all.

Talk about the lifelong problems alcohol during pregnancy can cause.

What if your family member or friend says she drank during another

pregnancy and the baby was okay? Remind her that every baby is differentand that no amount of alcohol can be safe every time.

Tell her that drinking alcohol during pregnancy causes mild to severeproblems, called Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD). Someproblems can make babies look different or have brain damage. Otherproblems are not visible at birth and may become apparent only laterin the child’s life.Babies whose mothers drink during pregnancy can be born small andhave trouble eating and sleeping.Pre-schoolers with FASD can be clumsy and have problems speakingand following directions.School children with FASD can have trouble learning and payingattention. Adolescents can make poor grades and have mood swings.As adults, some individuals with FASD are unable to manage moneyand live on their own. Some need lifelong medical care.You can help a pregnant family member or friend prevent problemslike these that can never be cured.

Talk about the risks of drinking any alcohol during pregnancy.
# C_2007129EN.01001201.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/12

---

Appeal brought on 12 April 2007 by Donal Gordon against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) delivered on 7 February 2007 in Case T-175/04: Donal Gordon v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-198/07 P)

(2007/C 129/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Donal Gordon (represented by: J. Sambon, P.-P. Van Gehuchten, and Ph. Reyniers, avocats)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

| — | to annul the Judgment in Case T-175/04 and to make a ruling on the substance of this case |
| --- | --- |

—

to annul the Judgment in Case T-175/04 and to make a ruling on the substance of this case

| — | to confirm the appellant's intrinsic interest in his CDR independent of the administration's interest therein; |
| --- | --- |

—

to confirm the appellant's intrinsic interest in his CDR independent of the administration's interest therein;

| — | to recognise that invalidity is by definition reversible, and is so regarded and so treated by the Commission's Medical Service; |
| --- | --- |

—

to recognise that invalidity is by definition reversible, and is so regarded and so treated by the Commission's Medical Service;

| — | to accord the appellant the right to judicial protection in respect of his CDR; |
| --- | --- |

—

to accord the appellant the right to judicial protection in respect of his CDR;

| — | to allow the claim to damages and to award the appellant €1.5 million in compensation; |
| --- | --- |

—

to allow the claim to damages and to award the appellant €1.5 million in compensation;

| — | to make an appropriate award as to costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

to make an appropriate award as to costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the judgment of the Court of First Instance is based on false and/or arbitrary premises in that it:

| — | Denies the appellant's autonomous interest in his career development report; |
| --- | --- |

—

Denies the appellant's autonomous interest in his career development report;

| — | Misrepresents the legislation on invalidity and the application thereof; |
| --- | --- |

—

Misrepresents the legislation on invalidity and the application thereof;

| — | Denies the appellant judicial protection despite the unresolved issue of whether his invalidity is occupational or not; |
| --- | --- |

—

Denies the appellant judicial protection despite the unresolved issue of whether his invalidity is occupational or not;

| — | Makes a ruling on damages in disregard of the evolving realities of the appellant's situation. |
| --- | --- |

—

Makes a ruling on damages in disregard of the evolving realities of the appellant's situation.

---
### Rediscount Corporations
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Working with PHMSA 

# In This Section

                      -  Working with PHMSA 
                      -  PHMSA Business Opportunities 
                      -  Commercial Services Management Program 
                      -  Government Purchase Card 
                      -  Grants 
                      -  State Programs 
                      -  Small Business 
                      -  Fraud Alert 
                      -  Contact Us 

## Related Links

                  -                                          DOT OSDBU                   
                  -                                          FedBizOpps                   
                  -                                          Small Business Administration                   
                  -                                          Small Business Innovation Research                   
                  -                                          PHMSA Procurement Forecast                   

## Contact Us

Acquisition Services
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**PHMSA.Acquisitions@dot.gov**Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Small Business

The PHMSA Small Business program ensures that socioeconomic business policies and goals of the Secretary of Transportation are implemented in a fair, efficient, and effective manner. 

PHMSA recognizes the impact small businesses have on our economy, and remain committed to exceeding benchmarks set for the agency and for the DOT by the Small Business Administration.From this site you are able to navigate to other sites that provide more detailed information on where to look for opportunities and what assistance is available for the small business community.

## Point of Contact

The PHMSA Acquisition Services Division is always looking to explore acquisition opportunities within the small business community. Small businesses are encouraged to email their marketing materials:

Dwayne Crossphmsa-smallbusiness@dot.gov202-366-4429
§ 17.635 Forms and instructions; coordination. ( a ) *Forms and instructions.* The designated agency official shall issue and promptly make available to interested persons forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Supervision and coordination.* The designated agency official may from time to time assign to officials of the Department, or to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government with the consent of such departments or agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of Title IX and these Title IX regulations (other than responsibility for review as provided in § 17.625(e)), including the achievements of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within the Department and within the Executive Branch of the Government in the application of Title IX and these Title IX regulations to similar programs and in similar situations. Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this section shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the designated official of this Department.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00347-CV

In re Erasmo Garcia

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief

pending disposition of his mandamus petition. We grant the motion for temporary relief, pending

further order of this Court, and stay execution of the order dated March 4, 2014, affirming the Texas

Real Estate Commission final order to the extent that the order dissolves the Rule 11 Agreement

dated March 22, 2012, as to the suspension of relator’s real estate license. We request that real party

in interest file a response to the mandamus petition no later than June 16, 2014. The real party in

interest may also address, in either its mandamus response or a separate, earlier filing, the

advisability of our continuing the temporary relief pending our resolution of the mandamus petition.

It is ordered June 3, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the “**Company**”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Jonathan K. Hsu, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 9,  2004 |
|-----------------|
|            |
|            |
|            | /s/ Jonathan K. Hsu |   |
|            | Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer |
|            | (Principal Financial and AccountingOfficer) |

 

----
# C_2006331EN.01001701.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — VDP Dental Laboratory NV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-401/05) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Exemptions - Article 13A(1)(e) - Scope of the exemption - Manufacture and repair of dental prostheses by an intermediary who does not have the status of dentist or dental technician - Subcontracting to a dental technician)

(2006/C 331/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VDP Dental Laboratory NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Articles 13, 17 and 28 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Notion of ‘dental prostheses supplied by dentists and dental technicians’ — Supply effected by a taxable person who has subcontracted the manufacture of a dental prosthesis to a dental technician — Right to deduct VAT in the case of supply in another Member State which has excluded an exemption

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13A(1)(e) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to supplies of dental prostheses effected by an intermediary like the one in question in the main proceedings who does not have the status of dentist or dental technician, but has acquired such prostheses from a dental technician.

---

(1)  OJ C 36, 11.2.2006.

1

---
# C_2007096EN.01003202.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/32

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 April 2007 — WWF European Policy Programme v Council

(Case T-264/04) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Exceptions relating to the protection of the public interest - Partial access)

(2007/C 96/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: WWF European Policy Programme (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Haynes, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Bauer, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Montaguti and P. Aalto, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Application for the annulment of the Council's decision of 30 April 2004 refusing to give the applicant access to certain documents relating to the meeting of the committee of the Council known as ‘the Article 133 Committee ’of 19 December 2003.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Adult EducationAdult LearningEducational PracticesEducational TheoriesLearning ProcessesLearning TheoriesStudent RoleTeacher RoleTeacher Student RelationshipTheory Practice RelationshipTransformative Learning

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget