alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.3**

 

**AMENDMENTNO. 1**

**TO**

**EMPLOYMENTAGREEMENT**

This AMENDMENT NO.1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “**Amendment**”),dated as of April 15, 2003, is by and among Elgar Holdings, Inc., aDelaware corporation (“**Holdings**”),Elgar Electronics Corporation, a California corporation and a wholly ownedsubsidiary of Holdings (“**EEC**”),and Joseph Budano (“**Executive**”).

**RECITALS**

WHEREAS,Executive, Holdings and EEC are party to an Employment Agreement, dated as ofJuly 17, 2002 (the “**EmploymentAgreement**”);

WHEREAS, Section 4.5of the Employment Agreement, among other things, obligates Executive topurchase from Holdings, and Holdings to issue and sell to Executive, 500,000shares of the common stock of Holdings at a purchase price of $0.10 per share;

WHEREAS, by agreementof Executive, Holdings and EEC, the sale and purchase of those shares has notyet occurred; and

WHEREAS,Executive, Holdings and EEC desire to amend the Employment Agreement to deletetherefrom Section 4.5 in its entirety.

**AGREEMENT**

NOW THEREFORE, inconsideration of the premises and the mutual agreements hereinafter set forth,the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

**1.             Amendment of Section 4.5. **Section 4.5 of the Agreement is hereby amended,superseded and replaced in its entirety by the following:

“**4.5.**       [intentionallyomitted]”

**2.             Waiver.** Each of the parties hereto expressly acknowledges and agrees that noother party hereto was in breach of the Employment Agreement because the saleand purchase of shares pursuant to Section 4.5 of the Employment Agreementwas not consummated prior to the date of this Amendment.

**3.             Governing Law.** This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, governed and enforced inaccordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

**4.             Counterparts. **This Agreement may be executed in one or morecounterpart copies, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all ofwhich taken together shall be deemed one and the same instrument.

**5.             NoFurther Amendment. **Except as amended hereby, the EmploymentAgreement shall continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Holdings and EEC have caused this Agreement to beexecuted on their behalf by their duly authorized officers and Executive hasexecuted the same as of the day and year first above written.

**ELGARHOLDINGS, INC.**
| By:    | /s/ Donald Glickman                                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Donald Glickman  Chairman of the Board and Vice President |

**ELGARELECTRONICS CORPORATION**
| By:               | /s/ Donald Glickman                                       |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|              | Donald Glickman  Chairman of the Board and Vice President |
|              |                                                      |
|              |                                                      |
| /s/ Joseph Budano |
| Joseph Budano     |

 

 

----
§ 9.52 Inspector General report. ( a ) The Inspector General, or other official as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, of each agency shall prepare and submit to Congress each year an evaluation of the compliance of that agency with, and the effectiveness of, the requirements in this part. The evaluation may include any recommended changes that may be necessary to strengthen or improve the requirements.
( b ) In the case of an agency that does not have an Inspector General, the agency official comparable to an Inspector General shall prepare and submit the annual report, or, if there is no such comparable official, the head of the agency shall prepare and submit the annual report.
( c ) The annual report shall be submitted at the same time the agency submits its annual budget justifications to Congress.
( d ) The annual report shall include the following: All alleged violations relating to the agency's covered Federal actions during the year covered by the report, the actions taken by the head of the agency in the year covered by the report with respect to those alleged violations and alleged violations in previous years, and the amounts of civil penalties imposed by the agency in the year covered by the report.
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

Nos. 09-1308, 09-1309 GLOBAL NAPS, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, Appellant,

v . VERIZON NEW ENGLAND INC. d/b/a VERIZON MASSACHUSETTS, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, Appellee, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ENERGY; PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner; JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner; W. ROBERT KEATING, in his capacity as Commissioner; DEIRDRE K. MANNING, in her capacity as Commissioner; and EUGENE J. SULLIVAN, JR., in his capacity as Commissioner. Defendants,

v . GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC.; GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC.; GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC.; FERROUS MINER HOLDINGS, LTD.; and FRANK GANGI, Counterclaim Defendants, Appellants, CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.; 1120 HANCOCK STREET, INC., 321 HEATH STREET REALTY TRUST; CJ3, INC.; and RJ EQUIPMENT, INC., Counterclaim Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on April 29, 2010, is amended as follows: On page 3, line 6, "fourth" is changed to "fifth".On page 25, line 12, "third" is changed to "other".

On page 25, footnote 18, lines 5-7, "But we did not rely on that rule to decide the case, nor did we consider the effect of the 1990 statute on it. Id. It does not bind us here." is changed to "Iglesias assumed that " S e c tion 1367 incorporates the common law doctrines of pendent and ancillary jurisdiction," id. at 241, which, we explain b e l o w, the Supreme Court has since squarely rejected, see Allapattah, 545 U.S. at 558-59. We will therefore reconsider this issue. See, e.g., Muskat v. United States, 554 F.3d 183, 189 (1st Cir. 2009)." On page 25, f o o tnote 19, "Exxon Mobile Corp. v. Allapattah Servs., Inc., 545 U.S. 546, 552-57 (2005)" is changed to "Allapattah, 545 U.S. at 552-57".
EX-33.8
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, MN 55414


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Management of the Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services
division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regard
to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government
(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").


Period:  As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the "Period").

Applicable Servicing Criteria:

The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and
1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Management of
the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.


With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company's management provides
the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

1. The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company management has assessed the Company compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to management's assertion of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association

By:    /s/ Shari Gillund
       Shari L. Gillund

Title: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 15, 2013


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### § 700.77 Livestock.

The term livestock shall mean all domesticated animals of every type owned by the displaced person.
§ 537.2 Submission of background information. A management contractor shall submit the background information required in § 537.1 of this part: ( a ) In sufficient time to permit the Commission to complete its background investigation by the time the individual is to assume management responsibility for, or the management contractor is to begin managing, the gaming operation; and
( b ) Within ten (10) days of any proposed change in financial interest.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF EDWARD J. BOREY PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Edward J. Borey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 9, 2004



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD J. BOREY                                            
|Edward J. Borey Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 100.154 Candidate debates.

Funds used to defray costs incurred in staging candidate debates in accordance with the provisions of 11 CFR 110.13 and 114.4(f) are not expenditures.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2003 of ServiceWare Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kent
Heyman, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





                                    /s/ KENT HEYMAN
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Kent Heyman, President and Chief Executive
                                  Officer


                                  May 15, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.93 When may the Secretary elect to acquire title to contractor-purchased property? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section when a self-determination contract or grant agreement, or portion thereof, is retroceded, reassumed, terminated, or expires, the Secretary shall have the option to take title to any item of government-furnished property: ( 1 ) Whose title has been transferred to an Indian tribe or tribal organization;
( 2 ) That is still in use in the program; and
( 3 ) That has a current fair market value, less the cost of improvements borne by the Indian tribe or tribal organization, in excess of $5,000.
( b ) If property referred to in paragraph (a) of this section is shared between one or more ongoing contracts or grant agreements and a contract or grant agreement that is retroceded, reassumed, terminated or expires and the Secretary wishes to use such property in the retroceded or reassumed program, the Secretary and the contractor or grantee using such property shall negotiate an acceptable arrangement for continued sharing of such property and for the retention or transfer of title.
# C_2014166EN.01001301.xml

| 3.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/13

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

2014/C 166/06

| Member State | Finland |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Helsinki–Savonlinna route |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 October 2014-31 December 2015 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 61 days after the day of publication of the notice of PSO |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | Ministry of transport and communications, |
| Kirjaamo, PB 31, |
| FI-00023 Valtioneuvosto, Helsinki |
| SUOMI/FINLAND |
| Tel. +358 295342001 |
| Fax +358 916028619 |
| E-mail: kirjaamo@lvm.fi |
| Internet: http://www.lvm.fi |

Member State

Finland

Concerned route

Helsinki–Savonlinna route

Period of validity of the contract

1 October 2014-31 December 2015

Deadline for submission of tenders

61 days after the day of publication of the notice of PSO

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge

Ministry of transport and communications,

Kirjaamo, PB 31,

FI-00023 Valtioneuvosto, Helsinki

SUOMI/FINLAND

Tel. +358 295342001

Fax +358 916028619

E-mail: kirjaamo@lvm.fi

Internet: http://www.lvm.fi

---
# C_2006326EN.01005305.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/53

---

Order of the President of the Court of 2 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-101/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 326/113)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 08.04.2006.

1

---
§ 9428.5 Format. ( a ) The application shall conform to the technical specifications described in the Commission's National Mail Voter Registration Form Technical Specifications.
( b ) *Size.* The application shall consist of a 5′′ by 8′′ application card of sufficient stock and weight to satisfy postal regulations. The application card shall be attached by a perforated fold to another 5′′ by 8′′ card that contains space for the information set forth at 11 CFR 9428.4(c).
( c ) *Layout.* ( 1 ) The application shall be sealable.
( 2 ) The outside of the application shall contain an appropriate number of address lines to be completed by the applicant using the state information provided.
( 3 ) Both sides of the application card shall contain space designated “For Official Use Only.”
( d ) *Color.* The application shall be of ink and paper colors of sufficient contrast to permit for optical scanning capabilities.
( e ) *Signature field.* The application shall contain a signature field in lieu of a signature line.
( f ) *Type size.* ( 1 ) All print on the form shall be of the largest practicable type size.
( 2 ) The requirements on the form specified in 11 CFR 9428.4(b)(1), (6), and (7) shall be in print identical to that used in the attestation portion of the application required by 11 CFR 9428.4(b)(2).
[59 FR 32323, June 23, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 37520, July 29, 2009]
### §627. Failure of selection for promotion

An officer in a grade below the grade of colonel or, in the case of an officer of the Navy, captain who is in or above the promotion zone established for his grade and competitive category under section 623 of this title and is considered but not selected for promotion by a selection board convened under section 611(a) of this title shall be considered to have failed of selection for promotion.

(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, §105, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2859.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to prescribe regulations under this subchapter effective on Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.

#### Transition Provisions Under Defense Officer Personnel Management Act

For provisions to prevent extinction or premature termination of rights, duties, penalties, or proceedings that existed or were begun prior to the effective date of Pub. L. 96–513 and otherwise to allow for an orderly transition to the system of officer personnel management put in place under Pub. L. 96–513, see section 601 et seq. of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 611 of this title.
#### § 584.13 May I file an objection to the recommended decision?

Yes. Within 20 days after service of the presiding official's recommended decision, any party may file objections with the Commission to any aspect of the decision and the reasons therefore, unless the recommended decision is to dissolve or make permanent a temporary closure order issued under § 573.4 of this chapter, in which case objections to the recommended decision must be filed within 5 days after service of the recommended decision.
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Vital Images, Inc.**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Inconnection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vital Images, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Annual Report”),I, Michael H. Carrel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.               The AnnualReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: | March 17,  2008 |   | /s/  Michael H. Carrel                 |
|--------|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                 |   | Michael  H. Carrel                     |
|   |                 |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                 |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)         |
|   |                 |   | Vital  Images, Inc.               |

 

 

----
# C_2007095EN.01003101.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/31

---

Action brought on 27 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-120/07)

(2007/C 95/58)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky and H. van Vliet, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/24/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, or in any event by not informing the Commission of those provisions, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/24/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, or in any event by not informing the Commission of those provisions, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | Order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed into national law expired on 30 October 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 136, p. 85.

1

---
EX‐35.2 

 

(logo) Torchlight

 

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

CERTIFICATION WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C7 (the “Trust”)

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to RBS Commercial Funding Inc., the Depositor, and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

1.                  I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  

 

Date:   March 11, 2015

TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC

By: /s/ Jacob BaronName: Jacob Baron Title:   Authorized Signatory

 

475 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017

T 212.883.2800  F 212.883.2560

E info@torchlightloanservices.com

   www.torchlightinvestors.com
#### § 273.191 How may a contract be renewed for Johnson-O'Malley funding?

An awarding official will notify the existing contracting party in advance of the contract's expiration and ask if the existing contracting party wants to renew the contract. The renewal must be in writing from the existing contracting party and the awarding official.
#### BRADY v. GREAT AMERICAN INS. CO.

No. 162P89

Case below: 92 N.C.App. 755

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1990.