12278 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

Discussion 

On April 23, 1998, the FAA Engine & 

Propeller Directorate issued engine AD 

98–09–27 (63 FR 24911, May 6, 1998). 

On April 30, 2001, the FAA Transport 

Airplane Directorate issued airplane AD 

2001–09–14 (66 FR 23838, May 10, 

2001). Those ADs both require the same 

initial and repetitive visual inspections 

of Rolls-Royce plc RB211–Trent 768 and 

772 series turbofan engine thrust 

reverser hinge lugs and attachment ribs 

for cracks, and, if necessary, removal 

from service and replacement with 

serviceable parts. 

Since we issued engine AD 98–09–27 

and airplane AD 2001–09–14, we 

determined that duplicate ADs to 

address the same unsafe condition were 

unnecessary. We issued a notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 

14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that 

would apply to the specified products. 

That NPRM was published in the 

Federal Register on November 15, 2010 

(75 FR 69611), and proposed to rescind 

AD 98–09–27, Amendment 39–10508 

(63 FR 24911, May 6, 1998). 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Operations office (telephone 

(800) 647–5527) is provided in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

Comments 

We provided the public the 

opportunity to participate in the 

development of this AD. We received no 

comments on the proposal. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the available data and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting the AD 

as proposed. 

Authority for this Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

(3) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a summary of the costs 

to comply with this AD and placed it in 

the AD Docket. You may get a copy of 

this summary at the address listed 

under ADDRESSES. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

rescinding airworthiness directive (AD) 

98–09–27, Amendment 39–10508 (63 

FR 24911, May 6, 1998): 

98–09–27R1 Rolls-Royce plc: Amendment 

39–16620. Docket No. FAA–2010–0960; 

Directorate Identifier 98–ANE–09–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This AD becomes effective April 11, 

2011. 

Affected ADs 

(b) This AD rescinds AD 98–09–27. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc 

RB211–Trent 768, 772, and 772B turbofan 

engines. These engines are installed on, but 

not limited to, Airbus A330–341 and A330– 

342 series airplanes. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

February 24, 2011. 

Peter A. White, 

Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4831 Filed 3–4–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0018; Airspace 

Docket No. 10–AWP–18] 

Amendment to and Revocation of 

Reporting Points; Hawaii 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule, technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: This action amends and 

removes, several Hawaiian Reporting 

Points. Specifically, the FAA is revising 

the description of EELIC, and TOADS to 

address recent technical adjustments to 

their actual locations. Additionally, the 

FAA is renaming the SILVA reporting 

point to SYVAD, and has determined 

that the LULUS, NIEMO, and PADDI 

reporting points are no longer needed. 

This action ensures the safe and 

efficient management of aircraft within 

the National Airspace System (NAS). 

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, May 5, 

2011. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under 1 CFR part 51, 

subject to the annual revision of FAA 

Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken 

McElroy, Airspace Regulation and ATC 

Procedures Group, Office of Mission 

Support Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

The Honolulu Control Center 

conducted a review of their airspace and 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 12279 

has identified two reporting points that 

need to be amended to align with their 

actual locations. No changes to the 

routing or procedures are being made. 

Several reporting points are no longer 

needed for air traffic control and are 

being removed, and one reporting point 

is being renamed. Accordingly, since 

this is an administrative change and 

does not involve a change in the 

dimension or operating requirements of 

this airspace, notice and public 

procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553 (b) are 

unnecessary. 

Hawaiian Reporting Points are listed 

in paragraph 7006 of FAA Order 

7400.9U dated August 18, 2010, and 

effective September 15, 2010, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Reporting Points listed in this 

document will be published 

subsequently in the Order. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by 

amending two Reporting Points (EELIC 

and TOADS) to reflect their actual 

locations. Additionally, the SILVA 

reporting point will be renamed 

SYVAD, and adjusted to reflect its 

actual location. The LULUS, NIEMO, 

and PADDI Reporting Points will be 

removed. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it amends Reporting Points in Hawaii. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: 

Polices and Procedures, paragraph 311a. 

This airspace action is not expected to 

cause any potentially significant 

environmental impacts, and no 

extraordinary circumstances exist that 

warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9U, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 18, 2010, and 

effective September 15, 2010, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 7006—Hawaiian reporting points. 

* * * * * 

EELIC [Amended] 

Lat. 19°27′26′′ N., long. 153°18′23′′ W. (INT 

Hilo, HI, 099° radial and the Honolulu 

CTA/FIR boundary). 

TOADS [Amended] 

Lat. 22°46′09′′ N., long. 156°41′46′′ W. (INT 

Mollkai, HI, 015° radial and the 

Honolulu CTA/FIR boundary). 

SYVAD [Amended] 

INT South Kauai, HI, 271° radial and long. 

162°45′29′′ W. 

LULUS: [Removed] 

NIEMO: [Removed] 

PADDI: [Removed] 

SILVA: [Removed] 

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 28, 

2011. 

Edith V. Parish, 

Manager, Airspace, Regulation and ATC 

Procedures Group. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4925 Filed 3–4–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Part 750 

[Docket No. 110224164–1168–02] 

RIN 0694–AF16 

Amendment to the Export 

Administration Regulations: 

Application Processing, Issuance, and 

Denial 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this final rule, the Bureau 

of Industry and Security (BIS) amends 

the Export Administration Regulations 

(EAR) by clarifying the Application 

Processing, Issuance, and Denial 

provisions concerning BIS’s authority to 

revise, suspend or revoke licenses. 

DATES: This rule is effective March 2, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sheila Quarterman, Bureau of Industry 

and Security, Regulatory Policy 

Division, by phone at 202–482–2440, or 

by e-mail at rpd2@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Amendment to the Export 

Administration Regulations: Part 750— 

Application Processing, Issuance, and 

Denial 

Part 750 of the EAR provides for the 

revision, suspension or revocation of 

licenses whenever it is known that the 

EAR have been violated or that a 

violation is about to occur. In this final 

rule, BIS revises the first sentence in 

paragraph (a) of Section 750.8 

(Revocation or suspension of licenses) 

by removing the phrase ‘‘whenever it is 

known that the EAR have been violated 

or that a violation is about to occur.’’ 

Harmonization is an objective for 

agencies under Executive Order 13563, 

which states: ‘‘In developing regulatory 

actions and identifying appropriate 

approaches, each agency shall attempt 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES