alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1025 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1025

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure the proper 
payment of approved nursing and allied health education programs under 
                         the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 1999

 Mr. Moynihan (for himself, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Santorum, Mr. 
 Durbin, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Specter, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Baucus, 
Mr. Chafee, Mr. Kerrey, and Mr. Cleland) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure the proper 
payment of approved nursing and allied health education programs under 
                         the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nursing and Allied Health Payment 
Improvement Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF NURSING AND ALLIED HEALTH EDUCATION COSTS IN 
              CALCULATING MEDICARE+CHOICE PAYMENT RATE.

    (a) Excluding Costs in Calculating Payment Rate.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1853(c)(3)(C)(i) of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-23(c)(3)(C)(i)) is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subclause 
                (I);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of subclause 
                (II) and inserting ``, and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subclause:
                                    ``(III) for costs attributable to 
                                approved nursing and allied health 
                                education programs under section 
                                1861(v).''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        apply in determining the annual per capita rate of payment for 
        years beginning with 2001.
    (b) Payment to Hospitals of Nursing and Allied Health Education 
Program Costs for Medicare+Choice Enrollees.--Section 1861(v)(1) of 
such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(v)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
    ``(V) In determining the amount of payment to a hospital for 
portions of cost reporting periods occurring on or after January 1, 
2001, with respect to the reasonable costs for approved nursing and 
allied health education programs, individuals who are enrolled with a 
Medicare+Choice organization under part C shall be treated as if they 
were not so enrolled.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010134EN.01002201.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, Brussels lodged on 3 March 2010 — Belpolis Benelux SA v Belgische Staat

(Case C-114/10)

2010/C 134/33

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, Brussels

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Belpolis Benelux SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

| 1. | Does Community law, in particular the principle of the freedom to provide services as laid down in Article 56 TFEU, preclude rules such as those laid down in Articles 1 and 1a of Belgian Royal Decree No 20 of 20 July 1970, under which the reduced rate of VAT (6 %) may be applied to construction work only if the service provider is registered in Belgium as a contractor in accordance with Articles 400 and 401 of the Wetboek van Inkomstenbelastingen (Belgian Income Tax Code) 1992? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Community law, in particular the principle of the freedom to provide services as laid down in Article 56 TFEU, preclude rules such as those laid down in Articles 1 and 1a of Belgian Royal Decree No 20 of 20 July 1970, under which the reduced rate of VAT (6 %) may be applied to construction work only if the service provider is registered in Belgium as a contractor in accordance with Articles 400 and 401 of the Wetboek van Inkomstenbelastingen (Belgian Income Tax Code) 1992?

| 2. | Do the provisions contained in Article 1 and 1a of Royal Decree No 20 of 20 July 1970 contravene the principle of fiscal neutrality and/or the general Community law principle of equal treatment by allowing the reduced rate of VAT (6 %) on construction work to apply only if the service provider is registered as a contractor in Belgium in accordance with Articles 400 and 401 of the Belgian Income Tax Code 1992? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do the provisions contained in Article 1 and 1a of Royal Decree No 20 of 20 July 1970 contravene the principle of fiscal neutrality and/or the general Community law principle of equal treatment by allowing the reduced rate of VAT (6 %) on construction work to apply only if the service provider is registered as a contractor in Belgium in accordance with Articles 400 and 401 of the Belgian Income Tax Code 1992?

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133044 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133044 COA: 274071 Genesee CC: 06-017465-FC MIKE MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0613 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 20, 2007

Clerk
|   MapStats                         |
|----------------------------------------------|
| USA MapStats|Select       a State|What's New |

MapStats: United StatesTo view a profile of your State, county, city, congressional district, orFederal judicial district, select the name of the State from the menu or use the map of the United States below.
Alabama         Alaska         Arizona         Arkansas        California         Colorado         Connecticut         Delaware         District of Columbia        Florida         Georgia         Hawaii         Idaho         Illinois         Indiana        Iowa         Kansas         Kentucky         Louisiana         Maine         Maryland        Massachusetts         Michigan         Minnesota         Mississippi         Missouri        Montana         Nebraska         Nevada         New Hampshire         New Jersey         New Mexico        New York         North Carolina         North Dakota         Ohio         Oklahoma         Oregon        Pennsylvania         Rhode Island         South Carolina         South Dakota         Tennessee        Texas         Utah         Vermont         Virginia         Washington         West Virginia        Wisconsin         Wyoming 
Profile of the United StatesFederal Judicial DistrictsState Court Districts

 **Fedstats - www.fedstats.gov/**About FedstatsSend your feedback to FedstatsInformation qualityPrivacy and accessibility
-, :I 

' 'IIN THE MATTER OF J.B.K. and J.T.K.. 

4 11 

I Youths in Xeed of Care. 

j 11 

/ / 

ORDER TO Si'BSTITtTTE APPEXDJX 

G~od cause appeanng, and counsel for the State ha1 1ng represented 

I 10 1, that Appellant's counsel has no objection, 

1 1 1 il IS HEREBY ORDERED tlm counsel for the State prepare a copy of 

12 the current Appendix of Appellant's hnef \&it11 the children's parents' names 11 

13 blacked out. 'The State Law Library is directed to substitute the altered copy il 

14 for the current Appendlx nou posted on this Court's web site. I I I 

I5 1 

16 i 

DATED thls ,& day of Febnary, 2004. 

/ 

l7 

18 

19 

I
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Adam Trebing, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C7 (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, TrimontReal Estate Advisors, LLC (f/k/a TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.), as TrustAdvisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, PGIM RealEstate Loan Services, Inc. (formerly known as Prudential AssetResources, Inc.), as Primary Servicer, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

 

Dated:March 17,2023

 

 

/s/ Adam Trebing

Adam Trebing

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  2023 ERISA Section 4050 (Missing Participants) Mortality ... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# 2023 ERISA Section 4050 (Missing Participants) Mortality Table

This mortality table is used as part of the "missing participant annuity assumptions" as discussed in 29 CFR 4050. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

November 18, 2022

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
§ 17.135 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each recipient shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under these Title IX regulations, including any investigation of any complaint communicated to such recipient alleging its noncompliance with these Title IX regulations or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations. The recipient shall notify all its students and employees of the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees appointed pursuant to this paragraph.
( b ) *Complaint procedure of recipient.* A recipient shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION(1)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted), Kevin P. Corcoran, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company"), and Edward C. Albini, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge:

1.       The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
periods covered by the Periodic Report and the results of operations of the
Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.

         This certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed "filed" by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.

         In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
the 28th day of March, 2003.

/s/ Kevin P. Corcoran                                   /s/ Edward C. Albini
----------------------------------------                ------------------------
Kevin P. Corcoran                                       Edward C. Albini
President and Chief Executive Officer                   Chief Financial Officer

----------------------------

(1) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Lynx and will be retained by Lynx and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification
"accompanies" the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of Lynx's filings under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-K),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.71 What type of reserve fund is anticipated for funds deposited into a reserve for replacement of facilities as specified in § 900.70(c)?

Reserve funds must be accounted for as a capital project fund or a special revenue fund.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   10-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             FEB-29-1996  
<CASH>                                         104,000                 145,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,269,000               1,732,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   420,000                 254,000
<INVENTORY>                                    950,000                 694,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,987,000               2,396,000
<PP&E>                                       2,683,000               2,739,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,571,000               2,702,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,113,000               2,433,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,437,000               5,278,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    44,075,000              42,632,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (46,524,000)            (47,402,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,113,000               2,433,000
<SALES>                                      5,184,000              11,310,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,184,000              11,310,000
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,099,000              10,213,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,017,000               4,083,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,000                 235,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,024,000)             (2,850,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000                   1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,025,000)             (2,851,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,901,000                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   876,000              (2,581,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18                    (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19                    (.89)
        

</TABLE>
### §2606. Exempted transactions

#### (a) In general

This chapter does not apply to credit transactions involving extensions of credit—

(1) primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural purposes; or

(2) to government or governmental agencies or instrumentalities.

#### (b) Interpretation

In prescribing regulations under section 2617(a) of this title, the Bureau shall ensure that, with respect to subsection (a) of this section, the exemption for credit transactions involving extensions of credit primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural purposes, as provided in subsection (a)(1) 1 of this section shall be the same as the exemption for such credit transactions under section 1603(1) of title 15.

(Pub. L. 93–533, §7, as added Pub. L. 103–325, title III, §312, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2221; amended Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2103(b), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–399; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1098(5), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2104.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subsection (a)(1) of this section, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "section 7(1) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974", and was translated as referring to section 7(a)(1) of that Act to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2606, Pub. L. 93–533, §7, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1727, related to seller or his agent confirming that information concerning an existing residence was disclosed to buyer in writing before a commitment for a mortgage loan was made, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–205, §6, Jan. 2, 1976, 89 Stat. 1158.

#### Amendments

2010–Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau" for "Secretary".

1996—Pub. L. 104–208 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
# C_2006310EN.01002906.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/29

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 October 2006 — Autobedrijf Geve v Commission

(Case T-315/99) (1)

1

(2006/C 310/63)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 4.3.2000.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Principal Executive OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)of theExchange Act**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAdvanstar Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thethree months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Loggia, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.
| By:    | /s/ Joseph Loggia       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph Loggia           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | Date: May 15, 2006 |

 

----