alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 513.30 When may the Commission use salary offset to collect debts? ( a ) The Commission collects debts owed by employees to the Federal Government by means of salary offset under the authority of: 5 U.S.C. 5514; 31 U.S.C. 3716; 5 CFR part 550, subpart K; 31 CFR 285.7; and this subpart. Salary offset is applicable when the Commission is attempting to collect a debt owed by an individual employed by the Commission or another agency.
( b ) Nothing in the regulations in this subpart precludes the compromise, suspension, or termination of collection actions under the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended, or the Federal Claims Collection Standards.
( c ) A levy pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code takes precedence over a salary offset under this subpart, as provided in 5 U.S.C. 5514(d) and 31 U.S.C. 3716.
( d ) The regulations in this subpart do not apply to any case where collection of a debt by salary offset is explicitly prohibited by another statute.
( e ) This subpart's regulations covering notice, hearing, written responses, and final decisions do not apply to: ( 1 ) Any routine intra-agency adjustment in pay that is attributable to clerical or administrative error or delay in processing pay documents that have occurred within the four pay periods preceding the adjustment, or any adjustment to collect a debt amounting to $50 or less. However, at the time of any adjustment, or as soon thereafter as possible, the Commission's payroll agency will provide the employee with a written notice of the nature and amount of the adjustment and a contact point for appealing the adjustment.
( 2 ) Any negative adjustment to pay that arises from the debtor's election of coverage or a change in coverage under a Federal benefits program requiring periodic deductions from pay, if the amount to be recovered was accumulated over four or fewer pay periods. However, at the time of the adjustment, the Commission's payroll agent will provide in the debtor's earnings statement a clear statement informing the debtor of the previous overpayment.
( f ) An employee's involuntary payment of all or any of the debt through salary offset will not be construed as a waiver of any rights that the employee may have under the law, unless there are statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for
the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ajay Sabherwal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ AJAY SABHERWAL Ajay Sabherwal Chief Financial Officer


November 9,
2010

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
-  Home 
-  Field Operations 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Field Operations 
                      -  Pipeline Field Operations 

# HazMat Enforcement Actions Search

# 

# Hazardous Materials Enforcement Actions Search

Search Hazardous Materials Legal Orders

# Pagination

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
- …
-  ›Next › 
-  »Last »
Exhibit 32.2


                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  KeySpan   Corporation   (the
"Corporation") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gerald Luterman,
Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Corporation,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                         /s/ Gerald Luterman
                                         -------------------
                                         Name: Gerald Luterman
                                         Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                         Date: April 30, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>
	
<ARTICLE>	                                           5
       	
<S>		     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>				3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>			Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>				Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>				Mar-31-1997
<CASH>					$7,000
<SECURITIES>				0
<RECEIVABLES>				1,461,000
<ALLOWANCES>				271,000
<INVENTORY>				1,549,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>			2,856,000
<PP&E>					1,467,000
<DEPRECIATION>				735,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>				3,634,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>			8,068,000
<BONDS>					0
<COMMON>					235,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>		1,770,000
<PREFERRED>				0
<OTHER-SE>					(6,439,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	3,295,000
<SALES>					2,792,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>			2,792,000
<CGS>				            1,921,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>				1,921,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>			0
<LOSS-PROVISION>			0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>			140,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>			(224,000)
<INCOME-TAX>				0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>			(224,000)
<DISCONTINUED>				0	
<EXTRAORDINARY>			0
<CHANGES>					0
<NET-INCOME>				(224,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>				(.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>				0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
                  OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

         I, Carl E. Vogel, the Chief Executive Officer of Renaissance Media
Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC
and Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (collectively, the "Company") in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

            -     fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            -     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ Carl E. Vogel
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Carl E. Vogel
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             November 12, 2003
### §2277a–11. Investment of funds

Money of the Corporation not otherwise employed shall be invested in obligations of the United States or in obligations guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.62, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title III, §302, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1618.)
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors and shareholdersof CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii),1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii)and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Companyperformed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors thatmay have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affectedthe balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determinationon the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
Exhibit 12.1

CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  (dollars in thousands)

Years Ended December 31,2004

2003

2002

2001

2000Available earnings:Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in net income of affiliate plus gains on sale of real estate

$
9,446

$
23,999

$
32,023

$
9,972

$
43,631Plus:Interest expense


33,032


25,735


27,456


32,299


32,915Amortization of deferred financing costs


3,567


3,354


2,918


2,376


2,155Distributed share of equity from affiliates


5,703


2,281


1,994


3,309


(294
)Available earnings

$
51,748

$
55,369

$
64,391

$
47,956

$
78,407Fixed charges:Interest expense, including interest expense from discontinued operations

$
33,032

$
27,596

$
30,452

$
32,299

$
32,915Amortization of deferred financing costs


3,567


3,354


2,918


2,376


2,155Interest capitalized


6,586


8,569


8,444


7,154


3,404Fixed charges

$
43,185

$
39,519

$
41,814

$
41,829

$
38,474Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


1.2


1.4


1.5


1.1


2.0


---



QuickLinks
```

[House Document 110-14]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

110th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 
110-14

 
     CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA OF THE 
 SPECIFIED ITEMS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE UNITED STATES SPACE LAUNCH 
 INDUSTRY, AND THAT THE MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ANY INDIRECT 
  TECHNICAL BENEFIT THAT COULD BE DERIVED FROM SUCH EXPORTS, WILL NOT 
  MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE 
   PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105-261, SEC. 1512

 February 13, 2007.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    In accordance with the provisions of section 1512 of the 
Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261), I hereby certify that the 
export to the People's Republic of China of the following items 
is not detrimental to the U.S. space launch industry, and that 
the material and equipment, including any indirect technical 
benefit that could be derived from such exports, will not 
measurably improve the missile or space launch capabilities of 
the People's Republic of China:
     Twenty Honeywell model QA 750 accelerometers to be 
incorporated into railway geometry measurement systems for 
China's Ministry of Railways.
     Equipment and technology associated with the 
production and testing of composite components for Boeing 
commercial aircraft.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, February 11, 2007.

                                  

```
# C_2007069EN.01000801.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/8

---

Action brought on 29 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Hungary

(Case C-30/07)

(2007/C 69/16)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and B.D. Simon, acting as Agent(s))

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Republic of Hungary

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

| — | A declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (1) or by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Republic of Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

A declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (1) or by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Republic of Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

1

| — | An order that the Republic of Hungary pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

An order that the Republic of Hungary pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for the implementation of the directive in national law expired on 23 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 16, 2003, p. 44.

1

---
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 
-  Pipeline Technical Resources 

## Related Links

                  -                                          GAO - Pipeline Safety: Information on Keystone Accidents and DOT Oversight                   

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Fax:**202-366-4566****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Oak Ridge National Laboratory Review of PHMSA's Pipeline Special Permit Process

ORNL PHMSA Special Permits Review 2023.pdf (2.42 MB)

In response to a July 2021 Government Accountability Office report entitled "Information on Keystone Accidents and DOT Oversight," PHMSA selected the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratories to conduct an assessment of various components of PHMSA's pipeline special permit program.

See the **report** for a full description of its findings, suggested improvements, and PHMSA's actions. 

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
### §3912. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2224(c), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–415

Section, Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IX, §913], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 100–418, title III, §3121(e), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1379, directed Secretary of the Treasury and certain Federal banking agencies to report to Congress, no later than 6 months after Nov. 30, 1983, regarding changes that could improve international lending operations of banking institutions.
# C_2006165EN.01001402.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/14

---

Appeal brought on 24 April 2006 by Société des Produits Nestlé SA against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) delivered on 22 February 2006 in Case T-74/04 Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), intervener: Quick restaurants SA

(Case C-193/06 P)

(2006/C 165/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Société des Produits Nestlé SA (represented by: D. Masson, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Quick restaurants SA

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the CFI judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February 2006; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the CFI judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February 2006; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs in their entirety |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs in their entirety

Pleas in law and main arguments

According to the applicant the Court of First Instance made an error of law in that it failed to assess the trade mark in question in its entirety and in concreto, whereas the trade mark in question is composed of a particularly distinctive character and its name, the figurative and verbal elements of that complex trade mark cannot be separated in this instance.

in concreto

The Court of Instance also disregarded the provisions of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 10 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (1) by failing to take account, when assessing the likelihood of confusion, of all the relevant elements in question, as regards both the trade mark sought by the applicant and the word mark of the intervener.

1

Finally, by examining only some of the rights invoked by the intervener in its opposition, the Court of First Instance disregarded the rules applicable to trade mark oppositions.

---

(1)  OJ 1994 L 11 p. 1

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          38,161
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (272)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,107
<PP&E>                                         641,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                (44,352)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 699,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        270,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           40,414
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                     388,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   699,275
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,958
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,457
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,772
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,729
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,729
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

THE ADT CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

The undersigned officers of The ADT Corporation (the Company) hereby certify to their knowledge
that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 28, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ NAREN GURSAHANEY   
|Naren Gursahaney       
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 27, 2012      
|                       
|/s/ KATHRYN A. MIKELLS 
|Kathryn A. Mikells     
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 27, 2012      

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation
S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).