alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §307. Compensation of directors

Directors of Federal reserve banks shall receive, in addition to any compensation otherwise provided, a reasonable allowance for necessary expenses in attending meetings of their respective boards, which amount shall be paid by the respective Federal reserve banks. Any compensation that may be provided by boards of directors of Federal reserve banks for directors, officers or employees shall be subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §4 (par.), 38 Stat. 257; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of par. 24 of section 4 of act Dec. 23, 1913. For classification to this title of other pars. of section 4, see Codification note set out under section 301 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
# C_2006249EN.01001601.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/16

---

Action brought on 28 August 2006 — Giorgio Beverly Hills v OHIM — WHG Westdeutsche Handelsgesellschaft (GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS)

(Case T-228/06)

(2006/C 249/38)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Beverly Hills Inc. (Cincinnati, USA) (represented by: M. Schaeffer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: WHG Westdeutsche Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Hagen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Overrule the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 21 June 2006 in joined Cases R 107/2005-2 and R 187/2005-2 as far as appeal No R 187/2005-2 was dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

—

Overrule the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 21 June 2006 in joined Cases R 107/2005-2 and R 187/2005-2 as far as appeal No R 187/2005-2 was dismissed;

| — | reject the opposition B 57259 dated July 6, 1998 as far as this opposition was upheld by the decision No 4157/2004 of the Opposition Division of 10 December 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition B 57259 dated July 6, 1998 as far as this opposition was upheld by the decision No 4157/2004 of the Opposition Division of 10 December 2004;

| — | order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings;

| — | order the intervener to bear the costs of the proceeding before the Office for Harmonisation. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to bear the costs of the proceeding before the Office for Harmonisation.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS’ for goods in classes 3, 14, 18 and 25 — application No 417 709

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: WHG Westdeutsche Handelsgesellschaft mbH.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The national word mark and Community figurative mark ‘GIORGIO’ for goods in classes 18, 24 and 25

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld for part of the contested goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: There is no sufficient risk of confusion between the conflicting trade marks as there does not exist a relevant similarity between the marks.

Pleas in law:

---
### [§2410c. Renumbered §2922f]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 2410c was renumbered section 4703 of this title.
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Fox Petroleum Inc. - Exhibit 10.1






PROMISSORY NOTE

	Principal Sum: $50,000 	May 23rd, 2008 
	  	London, UK 



	To: 	EuroEnergy Growth Capital S.A.
  
	  	Salduba Building, Top Floor,
  
	  	53rd East Street, Urbanizacion
  
	  	Obarrio Panama 5



          FOR
  VALUE RECEIVED, Fox Petroleum Inc. (the “Borrower”) promises to pay
  on the earlier of (i) the date that the Borrower obtains equity financing from
  a third party in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 net to the borrower, or (ii)
  May 23rd, 2009 (the “Payment Date”) to the order of EuroEnergy
  Growth Capital S.A., the principal sum of $50,000 (the “Loan”)
  in lawful currency of the United States.

          For
  the period from the date of advance of the Loan up to and including the Payment
  Date interest will accrue on the Loan on the balance of principal outstanding
  at the rate of 10% per annum, calculated and compounded monthly not in advance,
  until paid. Interest will be payable in a balloon payment on the Payment Date.

          The
  undersigned may at any time and from time to time prepay in whole or in part
  the said principal sum without notice or bonus or penalty.

          Presentment,
  protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour are hereby waived.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Borrower has duly executed this
Promissory Note as of the date first written above.

	Fox Petroleum Inc. 
	  	  
	  	  
	Per: 	/s/ Alex Craven 
	  	Alex Craven
#### IN THE MATTER OF: THE FORECLOSURE OF THE DEED OF TRUST EXECUTED BY FIRST RESORT PROPERTIES OF N.C., INC. TO SAMUEL H. POOLE, Trustee, and CHARLES BILLINGS and wife, JANICE BILLINGS, Beneficiaries, Recorded in Book 362, Page 546, Moore County Registry

No. 283A89

(Filed 1 March 1990)

APPEAL by petitioners Charles and Janice Billings pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 94 N.C. App. 99, 380 S.E.2d 124 (1989), and upon discretionary review as to additional issues allowed by this Court on 31 July 1989. The Court of Appeals affirmed the order of *Helms (William HJ,*,/., entered 6 June 1988 in Superior Court, MOORE County, dismissing the underlying foreclosure action and vacating an order allowing foreclosure entered by the Clerk of Superior Court, Moore County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 February 1990.

*Jack E. Carter and McCoy, Weaver, Wiggins, Cleveland & Raper, by Richard M. Wiggins, for petitioner-appellants Charles and Janice Billings.*

*Parham, Helms and Kellam, by Raymond L. Lancaster and William H. Trotter, Jr., for respondent-appellee Berkeley Federal*• *Savings and Loan Association.*

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The accompanying Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Terremark Worldwide,
Inc.
 Date: July 29, 2008
    /s/ Manuel D. MedinaChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
### §1790c. Reward for information leading to recoveries or civil penalties

The Board may pay rewards in connection with an offense affecting an insured credit union, under the same circumstances and subject to the same limitations that a Federal banking agency may pay rewards under section 1831j of this title in connection with an offense affecting a depository institution insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

(June 26, 1934, ch. 750, title II, §214, as added Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, §933(b), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 496.)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1095 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1095

To amend section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the 
        placed in service date for biomass and coal facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 1999

 Mr. Conrad (for himself and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the 
        placed in service date for biomass and coal facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Biomass and Coal Facilities 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PLACED IN SERVICE DATE FOR BIOMASS AND COAL 
              FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 29(g)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 (relating to extension for certain facilities) is amended by 
striking ``July 1, 1998'' and inserting ``the date which is 8 months 
after the date of the enactment of the Biomass and Coal Facilities 
Extension Act''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 63.5-63.9 [Reserved]
# C_2006190EN.01000401.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 June 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-459/04) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 89/391/EEC - Capabilities and aptitudes of persons designated to carry out activities related to protection against and prevention of occupational hazards in undertakings)

(2006/C 190/06)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Kreppel, J. Enegren and V. Kreuschitz, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Kruse and K. Wistrand, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Incomplete transposition of Article 7(8) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ 1989 L 183, p. 1) — Definitions of capabilities and aptitudes of workers designated by the employer to carry out activities related to protection against and prevention of occupational hazards in undertakings

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities and the Kingdom of Sweden to pay their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities and the Kingdom of Sweden to pay their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 19.02.2005.

1

---
exv10w7w2






Exhibit 10.7.2




AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT




     This Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Executive Employment Agreement, dated March 1, 2006,
and as amended by that certain amendment made as of January 1, 2008, is made as of May 28, 2008
(“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Energy Recovery Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its
principal offices at 1908 Doolittle Drive, San Leandro, CA 94577 (the “Company”) and G.G. Pique,
an individual (the “Executive”) (together, the “Parties”).



     Pursuant to Article 5.11 of the Executive Employment Agreement, the parties hereby amend the
Executive Employment Agreement as follows:



     Article 2.1(b)(iii). The Parties hereby add Article 2.1(b)(iii) as follows:




     (iii) Notwithstanding Article 2.1(b)(ii) to the contrary, however, in the event that
the scheduled IPO is not consummated through no fault of the Executive, as determined by the
Board (with the recusal by the Executive from such Board determination, as necessary) in
good faith, all of the Executive’s stock options granted under Executive’s 2006 Equity
Compensation Grant pursuant to Article 2.1(c) of Executive’s Executive Employment Agreement
shall immediately and fully vest effective as of December 31, 2008.


All other terms contained in the Executive Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and
effect.



WITNESS, the execution of this Amendment as of the date first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	“Employee”	 	 	 	“Company”	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ G.G. Pique 	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Hans Peter Michelet 	 	 
	 

	 	 

G.G. Pique
	 	 	 	 	 	 

Title: Company Representative
	 	 






May 28, 2008
---

CONSENT OF SRK CONSULTING (U.S.), INC.

I, Neal Rigby, on behalf of SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.,
consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is being
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references
to SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.s name and to the use of the technical report
titled NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment, Ambler Project, Kobuk, AK
dated effective February 1, 2012 (the Technical Report).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in NovaCopper
Inc.s Registration Statement (No. 333-185127) on Form S-3 and Registration
Statement (No. 333-181020) on Form S-8, of references to SRK Consulting (U.S.),
Inc.s name and to the use of the Technical Report, which is included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

|DATED: February
      12, 2013      | 
|----------------------------------- | 
|                                    | 
|SRK CONSULTING (U.S.), INC.         | 
|                                    | 
|/s/ Neal Rigby                      | 
|Name: Neal Rigby                    | 
|Title: Corporate Consultant, Mining | 

---
#### § 17.410 Comparable facilities.

A recipient may provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex, but such facilities provided for students of one sex shall be comparable to such facilities provided for students of the other sex.
# C_2006308EN.01000302.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4335 — DIEHL/THALES/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 308/04)

On 3 November 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4335. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4335. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
### §194. Dividends on adjusted claims; distribution of assets

From time to time, the comptroller shall make a ratable dividend of the money so paid over to him by such receiver on all such claims as may have been proved to his satisfaction or adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction, and, as the proceeds of the assets of such association are paid over to him, shall make further dividends on all claims previously proved or adjudicated; and the remainder of the proceeds, if any, shall be paid over to the shareholders of such association, or their legal representatives, in proportion to the stock by them respectively held.

(R.S. §5236; Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(g)(12), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2294.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5236 derived from act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, §50, 13 Stat. 114, which was the National Bank Act. See section 38 of this title.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–325 struck out ", after full provision has been first made for refunding to the United States any deficiency in redeeming the notes of such association" after "From time to time".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Application to District of Columbia

Provisions of this section were made applicable to banks, etc. in the District of Columbia by act Mar. 4, 1933, ch. 274, §4, 47 Stat. 1567.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exception as to Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by any provision of law in Comptroller of the Currency, referred to in this section, not included in transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 1 of this title.
#### § 81.42 Where are the results of the Election posted?

The Secretarial Election Board must post a copy of the Certificate of Results of Election at the local Bureau office, the tribal headquarters, and at other public places listed in the election notice. The Board also has the discretion to publicize the results using additional methods, such as by posting on the tribe's Web site.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  American Rescue Plan (ARP) Special Financial Assistance P... 
-  American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 More Resources 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 More Resources

**American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 More Resources (effective beginning July 27, 2023)**
                          - SFA Filing Instructions:                             - General SFA Application Filing Instructions
                            - Addendum A (for plans that have engaged in certain events)
                            - Addendum B (for plans that have suspended benefits)
                            - Addendum C (for IFR filers seeking to file a supplemented application)
                            - Addendum D (for MPRA plans) 
                          - Templates:                             - Template 1  |  Template 2  |  Template 3  |  Template 4A  |  Template 4B  |  Template 5A
                            - Template 5B  |  Template 6A  |  Template 6B  |  Template 7  |  Template 8  |  Template 9
                            - Template 10 
                          - Checklists:                             - Checklist for a general SFA application  |  Checklist for a supplemented SFA application 
                          - Additional Forms:                             - Lock-In Application
                            - SFA Application Amendment Cover Letter
                            - ACH Vendor Misc Payment Enrollment Form SF 3881 
                          - Model Plan Information:                             - Amendment Under 4262.6(e)(1) Regarding Compliance
                            - Amendment Under 4262.6(e)(2) Regarding Reinstatement
                            - Certification by Plan Under 4262.7(e)(2) Regarding Reinstatement  
                          - Annual Statement of Compliance:                             - Annual Statement of Compliance  (Log in to the  PBGC e-Filing Portal  to submit an Annual Statement of Compliance. An Annual Statement of Compliance is subject to the filing rules in part 4000 of PBGC’s regulations.) 
                          - Other Guidance:                             - IRS Notice 2021-38: Issues Relating to Special Financial Assistance from PBGC to Certain Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension Plans 
                          - Webinars and ARP SFA Webinar Slides

**Interim Final Rule Resources (For informational purposes only and superseded as of August 8, 2022)**
                          - SFA Filing Instructions:  Instructions  |  Addendum A  |  Addendum B                              - Template Checklist
                            - Template 1  |  Template 2  |  Template 3  |  Template 4  |  Template 5  |  Template 6  |  Template 7  |  Template 8
                            - FAQ on changes to instructions (December 2021) 

February 21, 2024
#### § 227.25 Inspection of premises, books and accounts.

Lessee shall agree to allow the lessor and his agents or any authorized representative of the Interior Department to enter, from time to time, upon and into all parts of the leased premises for the purposes of inspection and shall further agree to keep a full and correct account of all operations and make reports thereof, as required by the applicable regulations of the Department; and their books and records, showing manner of operations and persons interested, shall be open at all times for examination of such officers of the Department as shall be instructed in writing by the Secretary of the Interior or authorized by regulations, to make such examination.
### §1774. Approval of certificate; assets and obligations of applicant credit union

The Board shall approve any such organization certificate meeting such requirements. Upon such approval, the applicant credit union shall become a Federal credit union, and shall be vested with all of the assets and shall continue responsible for all of the obligations of such applicant credit union to the same extent as though the conversion had not taken place.

(Pub. L. 88–395, §2, Aug. 1, 1964, 78 Stat. 377; Pub. L. 91–206, §3, Mar. 10, 1970, 84 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 95–630, title V, §501, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3680.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Federal Credit Union Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Board", meaning the National Credit Union Administration Board, substituted in text for "Director", meaning Director of Bureau of Federal Credit Unions, pursuant to section 3 of Pub. L. 91–206 and section 501 of Pub. L. 95–630 [12 U.S.C. 1752a] which transferred functions of Bureau of Federal Credit Unions, and Director thereof, to National Credit Union Administration and vested authority for management of Administration in National Credit Union Administration Board.