alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006306EN.01000101.xml

| 15.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 December 2006

(2006/C 306/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3192 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4544 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67155 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0602 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5987 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,21 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1500 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5781 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,843 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6974 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7980 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4293 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,866 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8790 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6848 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5242 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2515 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9172 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0322 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 214,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2604 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3142 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3535 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 963,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6772 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,136 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,515 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3192

JPY

Japanese yen

155,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4544

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67155

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0602

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5987

ISK

Iceland króna

91,21

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1500

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5781

CZK

Czech koruna

27,843

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6974

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7980

RON

Romanian leu

3,4293

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,866

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8790

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6848

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5242

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2515

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9172

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0322

KRW

South Korean won

1 214,92

ZAR

South African rand

9,2604

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3142

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3535

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 963,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6772

PHP

Philippine peso

65,136

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6900

THB

Thai baht

46,515

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
1/ 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

‘RALD c. MINN 

ITO”elW QllUUL 

, ~ 

Honorable Bert Ford 

AdnrtnlOtratOr, Texas Liquor aontrol Board 

AWAn, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

PogGlation Pee 

86,000 or less . . . . . . )~U~.g~ 

25,001 to 75,000 . . . l . 

75,001 or more . . . . . . m:oo 

'The annual fee for a paokege aton, 

outside of olties and towns shall be 

One Hundred and Twenty-fire ($X36) 
Eionorablo Bert Ford, page 2 

Dollare, exoept 

a pokage store 

porsted olty or 

ths aunual tee ror 

outside 0r an lnoortown and wtthln two _. -~ (2) mllsa of the oorporate limits 

ehalL be the same as the roe required 

in said incorporatrd city or town. 

'The annual fee for a package store 

to sell wine only in cities and towns 

shall be based on population aocardlng to the last p~eoeding FsdsralCenaus as rolmf8: 

Population Fe* 

e,ooo or leaai. . . . . . . . # s.00 

e.001 to a,000 . . . . . . . 7.80 

S,OOl to 10,000. . . . . . . 10.00 

10,000 or more. . . . . . . . Ui.30 

*The annual ret9 rar a paokage *tore 

to sell wine only outdid8 or oitiea 

and towus ehall be Fire ($5) Dollars.~ 

“It 1s known that there hare been ohangea 

in the 1940 oenaua rigtwa over those 0r 1030 

whioh will a2ieot applloable permit'ieea with- ' 

iu the various olaasl2loationa. All paokage 

store perinltrr expire August 81, 1940, and ara 

aubjeot to renewal on September 1. Wo would 

like to know the date a new redera Csnsus beaomea orricially apylloable in determinlngthe 

aosecssd rates for paokage 8ton permits,w 

Thla Dspartaent haa heretorora passed upon the 

quoation aa to when the 1940 ~adoral amm beoomar oontrolllug under statutea involving population in Opinion 

NO. a-8337. A copy of this opinion is enclosed ror pour 

oonrsnlenoe. 

It will be noted that under Submotion (8) ai 

Seotion 15, Artlole I of the Teraa Liquor Oontml Aot, 

that the annual fes ror a paokage store In oltlea and 

towns and the annual fes ror a pWcaage atom to roll wine 

only in oitles and town8 shall be based on population aOoordlng to the last preceding ~edsral Census as stated in 

said statute. 
Iionorablo Bert Ford, Page 3 

A8 above rmntloned all paokase rtorei psrmitr 8xpire August 31, 1940, on6 are subjeot to renewal on Septenbar 1. 

In vlaw of the roregolng 8tatute and the above 

mentlor:ed oplnfon BTo. O-2337 you are respeottully adrlred 

that it la the opinion of thi8 D8partm8nt ii the offlolal 

proaounosment of the 1940 oenaus la asde prior to Septemb8nr 1, 1940, said oenau8 would beoo&8 ofiiolally applloabl8 ln deterslnlng the ass88aed rat4s for paokag4 mtor4 

p8rlaltr. On the other hand, It orfloial pronouno8ment or 

t&a 1940 Federal Cen8ua la not aado until after Septmnbrr 

1, 1940, then the Federal aensu8 of 1930 would bo applloable in determlnlng the aclsesred rater for paokage 8tore 

pemitm. 

mmdng that the r0ng0iw sully an8w4rs your 

inquiry, ti are 

Tour6 very truly
#### § 700.555 Notary services.

An employee may not charge a fee for performing notarial services as part of his or her job duties (EO 977 Nov. 24, 1908).
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1065

To authorize negotiation for the accession of Chile to the North American

Free Trade Agreement, to provide for Fast Track Consideration, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 18 (legislative day, MAY 14), 1999

Mr. DODD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To authorize negotiation for the accession of Chile to the

North American Free Trade Agreement, to provide for

Fast Track Consideration, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chile Fast Track Act

5 of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. ACCESSION OF CHILE TO THE NORTH AMERICAN

7 FREE TRADE AGREEMENT.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to section 3, the Presi9 dent is authorized to enter into an agreement described
2

S 1065 IS

1 in subsection (b) and the provisions of section 151(c) of

2 the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2191(c)) shall apply

3 with respect to a bill to implement such agreement if such

4 agreement is entered into on or before December 31,

5 2005.

6 (b) AGREEMENT DESCRIBED.—An agreement de7 scribed in this subsection means an agreement that—

8 (1) provides for the accession of Chile to the

9 North American Free Trade Agreement; or

10 (2) is a bilateral agreement between the United

11 States and Chile that provides for the reduction and

12 ultimate elimination of tariffs and other nontariff

13 barriers to trade and the eventual establishment of

14 a free trade area between the United States and

15 Chile.

16 SEC. 3. INTRODUCTION AND FAST-TRACK CONSIDERATION

17 OF IMPLEMENTING BILL.

18 (a) INTRODUCTION IN HOUSE AND SENATE.—When

19 the President submits to Congress a bill to implement a

20 trade agreement described in section 2, the bill shall be

21 introduced (by request) in the House and the Senate as

22 described in section 151(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19

23 U.S.C. 2191(c)).

24 (b) PERMISSIBLE CONTENT IN IMPLEMENTING LEG25 ISLATION.—A bill to implement a trade agreement de-
3

S 1065 IS

1 scribed in section 2 shall contain provisions that are nec2 essary to implement the trade agreement, and may include

3 trade-related labor and environmental protection stand4 ards.

5 (c) APPLICABILITY OF FAST TRACK PROCEDURES.—

6 Section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2191)

7 is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (b)(1) by inserting ‘‘section 3

9 of the Chile Fast Track Act of 1999,’’ after ‘‘the

10 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988,’’;

11 and

12 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting ‘‘or under

13 section 3 of the Chile Fast Track Act of 1999,’’

14 after ‘‘the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,’’.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.198 Are Federal employees assigned to a self-determination contractor under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act or detailed under section 214 of the Public Health Service Act covered to the same extent that they would be if working directly for a Federal agency?

Yes.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

87-2 

January 28, 1987 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4204 Sale of Assets 

OPINION: 

This responds to your request for the opinion of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("the PBGC" ) on the

application of Section 4204 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended ("ERISA" or "the Act").

Specifically, you ask whether ERISA Section 4204 applies when a manufacturer and distributor ("the seller" ) partially

or completely ceases participation in a multiemployer plan by selling its distribution rights to local distribution companies

("the purchasers") and assigning to the purchasers leases for vehicles used in delivery of the seller's product. 

Under ERISA Section 4204, a complete or partial withdrawal does not occur as a result of a bona fide, arm's-length

sale of assets to an unrelated party if (1) the purchaser has an obligation to contribute for substantially the same number

of contribution base units for which the seller had an obligation to contribute; (2) the purchaser provides a bond or

establishes an escrow for five plan years following the sale; and (3) the contract for the sale provides that the seller is

secondarily liable to the plan if the purchaser withdraws during those five plan years and fails to pay its withdrawal [*2]

liability. 

Anything of value, including distribution rights and leases, may be an asset within the meaning of ERISA Section

4204. In the situation you describe, it appears that the distribution rights and leases are an integral part of the purchasers'

performance of the work that gave rise to the seller's obligation to contribute to the plan and the purchasers will be

obligated to contribute with respect to such work. In such a case, the PBGC's opinion is that the sale of these assets

would constitute a sale of assets within the meaning of Section 4204, and that section would apply to the transaction if

the other requirements of that section are met. 

The PBGC has not independently verified the facts set forth in your letter and does not opine whether the distribution

arrangement constitutes a sale. ERISA provides that the determination of factual questions arising under ERISA Sections

4201-4219 is, in the first instance, the responsibility of the plan sponsor. The Act further provides that an employer's

dispute of the plan sponsor's determination is to be resolved first through arbitration, subject to review in the courts. 

If you have further questions, please contact the attorney [*3] handling this matter, John Foster, of the PBGC's

Corporate Policy and Regulations Department. His telephone number is 202-778-8850. 

John H. Falsey 

Acting General Counsel
§ 158.802 Performance management program. ( a ) In alignment with the DHS-CS's core values described in § 158.305 and the compensation strategy described in § 158.601, the Secretary or designee establishes and administers a systematic performance management program to: ( 1 ) Establish and maintain individual accountability among DHS-CS employees;
( 2 ) Manage, recognize, and develop the performance of each DHS-CS employee; and
( 3 ) Improve effectiveness of DHS-CS employees in executing the DHS cybersecurity mission.
( b ) The performance management program comprises the following ongoing reviews: ( 1 ) Appraisal reviews described in § 158.804;
( 2 ) Mission impact reviews described in § 158.805; and
( 3 ) Development reviews described in § 158.806.
( c ) To complete appraisal reviews, mission impact reviews, and development reviews for a DHS-CS employee, the Department may collect, on a periodic or ongoing basis, information and input from: ( 1 ) The DHS-CS employee;
( 2 ) Other DHS-CS employees;
( 3 ) The employee's supervisor; and
( 4 ) Other appropriate officials.
§ 13.28 Motions. ( a ) Any application to the ALJ for an order or ruling will be by motion. Motions will state the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged, and will be filed and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions Made during a prehearing conference or at the hearing, all motions will be in writing. The ALJ may require that oral motions be reduced to writing.
( c ) Within 15 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the ALJ, any party may file a response to such motion.
( d ) The ALJ may not grant a written motion before the time for filing response thereto has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion, but may overrule or deny such motion without awaiting a response.
( e ) The ALJ will Make a reasonable effort to dispose of all outstanding motions before the hearing begins.
( f ) Except as provided by §§ 13.21(e)(3) and 13.23(f), which concern subpoenas, the filing or pendency of a motion will not automatically alter or extend a deadline or return date.
§ 115.86 Sexual abuse incident reviews. ( a ) Each facility shall conduct a sexual abuse incident review at the conclusion of every investigation of sexual abuse and, where the allegation was not determined to be unfounded, prepare a written report within 30 days of the conclusion of the investigation recommending whether the allegation or investigation indicates that a change in policy or practice could better prevent, detect, or respond to sexual abuse. The facility shall implement the recommendations for improvement, or shall document its reasons for not doing so in a written response. Both the report and response shall be forwarded to the agency PSA Coordinator.
( b ) The review team shall consider whether the incident or allegation was motivated by race; ethnicity; gender identity; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or intersex identification, status, or perceived status; or gang affiliation; or was motivated or otherwise caused by other group dynamics at the facility.
( c ) Each facility shall conduct an annual review of all sexual abuse investigations and resulting incident reviews to assess and improve sexual abuse intervention, prevention and response efforts. If the facility has not had any reports of sexual abuse during the annual reporting period, then the facility shall prepare a negative report. The results and findings of the annual review shall be provided to the facility administrator, Field Office Director or his or her designee, and the agency PSA Coordinator.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Vargas, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 750]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered on or about June 28, 2005, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Buckley, PJ, Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Skip to main content

## Menu

      -  Search         - Everything
        - Documents
        - Events
        - Audio & Video
        - TechDirect Archives 
      -  Browse site         - Technologies
        - Contaminants
        - Issues
        - Strategies & Initiatives
        - Vendors & Developers
        - Training & Events
        - About CLU-IN
        - Recent & Popular Additions
        - In The News
        - TechDirect and Newsletters
        - Documents
        - Multimedia
        - Databases
        - Software and Tools 

## Search

      - Everything
      - Documents
      - Events
      -  More         - Audio & Video
        - TechDirect Archives 

Clear

## Search results

## Footer links

      - Disclaimer, Privacy & Security
      -  Site Map
      -  About CLU-IN
      - Contact Us
      - Sponsored by the U.S. EPA
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Jordan, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 690]

Appeals by the defendant from (1) an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.) entered December 5, 2005, and (2) an amended order of the same court entered December 12, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order was superseded by the amended order; and it is further,

*661Ordered that the amended order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court, in determining his risk level *(see*Correction Law § 168-n), properly assessed points against him based on his prior youthful offender adjudication of sodomy in the first degree *(see People v Moore,*1 AD3d 421 [2003]). Moreover, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to depart downward to risk level two *(see People v Guaman,*8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Accordingly, the defendant was properly designated a level three sex offender. Florio, J.E, Miller, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
#### Slinkard *v.*Sentinel Printing Company.

[No. 11,805.

Filed January 30, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 12, 1925.]

From Sullivan Circuit Court; *Walter F. Wood,*Judge.

Action between William L. Slinkard and the Sentinel Printing Company. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals. *Affirmed. ■*By the court in banc, ■

*726
      *Slinkard & Slinkard*and *Charles D. Hunt,*for appellant.

*William A. Pickens, Linton A. Cox, Earl B. Conder*and *William A. Bain,*for appellee.

Remy, J.

Affirmed on authority of *Chastain*v. *Board, etc.*(1918), 68 Ind. App. 162, 119 N. E. 1007.
#### § 304.5 Dies to identify tribe.

Dies are marked with name of tribe. A Navajo stamp will be used where the marker is a Navajo Indian; similarly, for Zuni, Hopi, and Rio Grande Pueblo.
H. Res. 87

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 2, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

they are hereby, elected to the following joint committees of

Congress, to serve with the chairman of the Committee on

House Administration:

JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY: Mr.

Boehner, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Hoyer, and Mr. Davis of Florida.

JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING: Mr. Boehner, Mr.

Ney, Mr. Hoyer, and Mr. Fattah.

Attest:

Clerk.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Online Transactions: My Pension Benefit Access (MyPBA) FAQs 
-  Apply For Your Benefits 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Apply for Your Benefits

## **Things to Remember About Applying for Benefits**

                          - You can apply for a pension if:                               - you are now eligible or will be eligible within the next 180 days to receive benefits from PBGC, under the provisions of your pension plan; and
                            - you would like to begin receiving your retirement benefit within the next 180 days. 
                          - Before you apply for your benefit, you must  request an estimate  of your benefit amount. The estimate will tell you how much your benefit would be under each possible form of benefit available to you on the date you want your benefits to start. 
                          - PBGC will contact you if you are missing any "proof documents" (e.g., a birth certificate) that are required to complete your application.
                          - You will start to receive payments about three months after you contact PBGC about your pension benefits. For example, if you contact us during January, the soonest your benefit can start is April 1.
                          - Note:  if you are a beneficiary of a deceased participant, more information is available on  Beneficiaries and Reporting the Death of a Participant .

## **How to Apply**

                          - Use our online service,  My Pension Benefit Access (MyPBA)  to apply. **OR**	 
                          - Call PBGC's Customer Contact Center to request an application for pension benefits.                               - Call at 1-800-400-7242. TTY/ASCII users may call 711.
                            - Remember to have your Social Security or customer ID number, plan name, and case number ready for the customer service representative so that they are better able to help you. 

January 10, 2023

##           Contact Us      

Visit our Contact Us page for more information.

##           Stay Connected with Us      

Receive email notices when PBGC issues a press release.

Join the conversation and connect with us on social media.

﻿
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Crowley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | /s/JOHN P. CROWLEYJohn P. Crowley Chief Financial Officer |  | 
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | May 9, 2007                                               |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
155 So.2d 535

#### Hilliard A. SANDERS v. STATE.

3 Div. 85, 85A.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 27, 1963.

Rehearing Denied July 25, 1963.

Hilliard A. Sanders, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

GOODWYN, Justice.

Petition of Hilliard A. Sanders for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review Sanders v. State, Ala.App., 152 So.2d 439 and 155 So.2d 535.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.