alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1430c. Housing goals

#### (a) In general

The Director shall establish housing goals with respect to the purchase of mortgages, if any, by the Federal Home Loan Banks. Such goals shall be consistent with the goals established under sections 4561 through 4564 of this title.

#### (b) Considerations

In establishing the goals required by subsection (a), the Director shall consider the unique mission and ownership structure of the Federal Home Loan Banks.

#### (c) Transition period

To facilitate an orderly transition, the Director shall establish interim target goals for purposes of this section for each of the 2 calendar years following July 30, 2008.

#### (d) Monitoring and enforcement of goals

The requirements of section 4566 1 of this title, shall apply to this section, in the same manner and to the same extent as that section applies to the Federal housing enterprises.

#### (e) Annual report

The Director shall annually report to Congress on the performance of the Banks in meeting the goals established under this section.

(July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §10C, as added Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title II, §1205, July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2786.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4566 of this title, referred to in subsec. (d), was in the original "section 1336 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Safety and Soundness Act of 1992", which was translated as meaning section 1336 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1 See References in Text note below.
EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    ADDENDUM
      TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND REORGANIZATION DATED MARCH 20, 2008 AMONG
      SINGLE TOUCH SYSTEMS INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HOSTING SITE NETWORK, INC.), SINGLE
      TOUCH ACQUISITION CORP. AND SINGLE TOUCH INTERACTIVE, INC.

    


    This
      Addendum is made and entered into as of the 29th
      day of
      May 2008. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this
      Addendum shall have the meaning given to them as in the Agreement and Plan
      of
      Merger and Reorganization.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants contained herein and
      intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto agree as
      follows:

    


    1.    Section
      8.2 of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization is amended to read
      as
      follows:

    


    “8.2.
      TERMINATION
      FOR FAILURE TO CLOSE.

    


    This
      Agreement shall be automatically terminated if the Closing Date shall not have
      occurred by June 30, 2008, unless extended in writing by mutual agreement of
      both the Parent and the Company”.

    


    2.    All
      other
      terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization shall continue
      with
      full force and effect.

    


    3.    This
      Addendum may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall
      be
      deemed to be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute
      one
      and the same agreement.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum has been executed by the Parties as of the date
      first above written:

    


    
      	
              PARENT:

            	 	 
	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH SYSTEMS INC.

            	 	 
	 	 	 
	
              By: 
                /s/
                Scott Vicari

              
                

              

              Name: Scott
                Vicari

            	 	 
	
              Title: President

            	 	 
	 	 	 
	
              ACQUISITION
                SUBSIDIARY:

            	 	
              COMPANY:

            
	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH ACQUISITION CORP.

            	 	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH INTERACTIVE, INC.

            
	 	 	 
	
              By: 
                /s/
                Scott Vicari

              
                

              

              Name:
                Scott
                Vicari

            	 	
              By: 
                /s/
                Anthony Macaluso

              
                

              

              Name:
                Anthony
                Macaluso

            
	
              Title:
                President

            	 	
              Title:
                Chief
                Executive Officer
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-30 

October 22, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4062 Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter requesting an opinion concerning the effect of Section 4062 of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act, as amended by Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 ("ERISA"), 29

U.S.C. § 1362 (1976 and Supp. IV 1980) on a seller and other members of a controlled group of corporations with the

seller following the sale of the stock of the seller's subsidiary corporation to an unrelated buyer under circumstances in

which the defined benefit pension plan of the former subsidiary continues to be maintained by the former subsidiary after

the sale. 

PBGC will not, as a general rule, seek from the seller and other members of a controlled group of corporations with

the seller employer liability under Section 4062 of ERISA, with respect to a termination of a pension plan by a successor

employer after the sale of stock of a subsidiary corporation, if: 

(1) as of the closing date of the sale the plan had sufficient assets to satisfy all benefits which are guaranteed by the

PBGC under Title IV, or 

(2) the plan's assets are not sufficient to satisfy guaranteed benefits on such date, 30% of the statutory [*2] net worth

of the employer maintaining the plan immediately after the closing is greater than the sum of the plan asset insufficiencies

of all the single-employer plans maintained by such employer. 

I trust this will help you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
# C_2006301EN.01001601.xml

| 12.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4454 — TPG/Télédiffusion de France)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 301/09)

On 4 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4454. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4454. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
### §895a. Art. 95a. Disrespect toward sentinel or lookout

(a) Disrespectful Language Toward Sentinel or Lookout.—Any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that another person is a sentinel or lookout, uses wrongful and disrespectful language that is directed toward and within the hearing of the sentinel or lookout, who is in the execution of duties as a sentinel or lookout, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Disrespectful Behavior Toward Sentinel or Lookout.—Any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that another person is a sentinel or lookout, behaves in a wrongful and disrespectful manner that is directed toward and within the sight of the sentinel or lookout, who is in the execution of duties as a sentinel or lookout, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5412, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2943.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
-  Home 
-  Registration 

# In This Section

                      -  Registration Overview 
                      -  Registration Information 
                      -  Registration Online 
                      -  Registration by Mail 
                      -  Registration International 

# FY 2018 Registration Program Summary Report

fy2018-registration-fee-program-summary-final-report-dec2018.pdf (226.47 KB)

FY 2018 Registration Program Summary Report

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
### [§680. Renumbered §12312]
# C_2007096EN.01004001.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/40

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 April 2007 — C and F v Commission

(Cases F-44/06 and F-94/06) (1)

1

(Officials - Article 78 of the Staff Regulations - Invalidity pension - Compliance with a judgment of the Court of First Instance - Action for annulment and compensation)

(2007/C 96/82)

Language of the cases: French

Parties

Applicants: C and F (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. van Rossum, S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

In Case F-44/06:

First, annulment of the decision of 13 June 2005 refusing to adopt, with respect to the applicant, any measure to comply with the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-376/02, brought by the same applicant against a decision of 14 January 2002 and, second, annulment of the decision of 23 February 2006 compulsorily retiring the applicant with entitlement to an invalidity allowance to be determined in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations, with retroactive effect from 1 February 2002.

In Case F-94/06:

First, annulment of the decision of 23 February 2006 compulsorily retiring the applicant with entitlement to an invalidity allowance to be determined in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations, with retroactive effect from 1 February 2002 and, second, an application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The Commission of the European Communities is ordered to pay the applicant compensation of EUR 2 000 in respect of non-material damage sustained by him. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Commission of the European Communities is ordered to pay the applicant compensation of EUR 2 000 in respect of non-material damage sustained by him.

| 2. | The remainder of the applications is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The remainder of the applications is dismissed.

| 3. | The Commission of the European Communities is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the applicant's costs in Cases F-44/06 C v Commission and F-94/06 F v Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission of the European Communities is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the applicant's costs in Cases F-44/06 C v Commission and F-94/06 F v Commission.

C

Commission

F

Commission

---

(1)  F-44/06: OJ C 154, 1.7.2006, p. 25 and F-94/06: OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 22.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Photos

slide show module

US, Japan conduct flight demonstrations during MCAS Iwakuni’s 45th Friendship Day

US, Philippines conduct joint force Multi-Domain Task Force operation during Exercise Balikatan 24

15th MEU, USS Boxer conduct reconnaissance and surveillance mission in the Pacific Ocean

MARFORPAC, Philippine Marines conduct urban operations training during Exercise Balikatan 24

Guam National Guard launches State Partnership with Palau

USARPAC, Philippine Air Force combine air defense systems for first time ever during Exercise Balikatan 24

USS Howard conducts routine flight quarters while transiting the South China Sea

MARFORPAC, Philippine marines conduct key terrain security mission during Exercise Balikatan 24

USS Theodore Roosevelt conducts routine flight operations in the South China Sea

MARFORPAC, Philippine Marine Corps conduct small unmanned aerial system integrated training during Exercise Balikatan 24
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-12 

December 23, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4007(a). Payment of Premiums. Due Dates

4002(b)(8) Benefits Guaranteed. Five Year Phase-in of Guarantee

4062(b) Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans. Amount of Employer Liability 

OPINION: 

 This is in further response to your recent inquiry as to whether a defined benefit pension plan established in April

of 1974 with a plan fiscal year ending on April 30, and where no contributions have been made for the plan year ending

on April 30, 1975, has any benefits guaranteed under Section 4022 of the Act and, consequently, a potential liability

under Section 4062 if the plan were terminated in November, 1974. 

If the subject plan terminated in November of 1974, no portion of the benefits would be guaranteed and, therefore,

the employer would incur no liability under Section 4062 of the Act. However, premiums would be due and payable

to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation nevertheless. 

I trust this answers your question. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 117.26 Expenses incurred pending qualification of an executor or administrator. Pending the qualification of the executor or administrator of the estate of a deceased Indian of one-half or more Indian blood who did not have a certificate of competency at the time of his death, the superintendent may authorize the extension of credit for the following purposes, subject to allowance of claims by the executor or administrator and approval thereof by the court: ( a ) Funeral expenses, including the cost of a funeral feast, in an amount not to exceed $1,000.
( b ) Necessary expenses in hearings before the Osage Agency involving the approval or disapproval of last wills and testaments.
( c ) Expenses necessary to preserve restricted property.
# C_2007020EN.01004101.xml

| 27.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/41

---

Action brought on 18 December 2006 — Continolo v Commission

(Case F-143/06)

(2007/C 20/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Donato Continolo (Duino, Italy) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, C. Bernard-Glanz and R. Albelice, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Tribunal is asked to:

| — | annul the decision of the Commission of 3 January 2006 concerning the award and calculation of the applicant's pension rights to the extent that it credits the period which the applicant spent on leave on personal grounds from 11 June 1981 to 1 March 1983 only 5 months, 6 days of pensionable service, instead of 8 months, 20 days; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission of 3 January 2006 concerning the award and calculation of the applicant's pension rights to the extent that it credits the period which the applicant spent on leave on personal grounds from 11 June 1981 to 1 March 1983 only 5 months, 6 days of pensionable service, instead of 8 months, 20 days;

| — | annul the decision of the Commission of 5 September 2006 dismissing the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission of 5 September 2006 dismissing the applicant's complaint;

| — | indicate to the Commission the consequences of the annulment of the contested decisions, in particular, concerning the percentage acquired, currently fixed at 66.66666 %, which must be recalculated to take account of the months of January and February 1983; |
| --- | --- |

—

indicate to the Commission the consequences of the annulment of the contested decisions, in particular, concerning the percentage acquired, currently fixed at 66.66666 %, which must be recalculated to take account of the months of January and February 1983;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a former Commission official, has been retired since 1 January 2006. In his action, he contests the decision of the Commission concerning the award and calculation of his pension rights inasmuch as that decision discloses that the rights which he acquired for the period of his leave on personal grounds, in respect of which he had obtained a transfer into the Community system, have not been wholly credited.

The applicant relies, first, on breach of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations, of the principle of sound administration and of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials and, secondly, on a manifest error of assessment and of a breach of the duty to state reasons.

---
NOx Formation –

Measure Phase

John Hausman

March 1, 2008
1
Cause and Effect Diagram

F C and GB F ired Pellet F urnace C ond

Mach Speed

HL Depth

Total Gas

S Chamber Gas

N Chamber Gas

Feed Rate

Silica

Ferrous

Total F e

Wet Fe++

Sat Fe++

GB Moisture

NOx Formation C&E Matrix

2

F ormation

NO x

Press and Temps Scrubbers

Bed Depth

Mach Speed

Air Flow

Water Flow

Venturi dP

Demist dP

CaO

WBR Press

CAF Head Press

Mach Dis Temp

Hood 22 Temp

Hood 18 Temp

Fir Hood Press

2nd Cool Hood Press

Burn Thru Temp

WEX Press

UDD Press

Wet Fe++
Cause and Effect Matrix

 All X’s on Cause and Effect Diagram are already collected 

in our PI historian, so no C&E Matrix was needed to 

determine which X’s to collect. 

3
Operational Definitions (Y’s)

4
Operational Definitions (X’s)

5
6
7
8
Test Plan

9
Data Collection Plan

 All NOx Data will be collected by Barr Engineering in 

accordance to our Test Schedule. Furnace Conditions will be 

10

changed by Jeff Jones. 

 All other data will be exported post-test period from our PI 

historian into Excel/Minitab for analyses. 
Measurement Systems Analysis

 The continuous emissions equipment from Barr are 

certified to be accurate. 

No MSA was completed on the NOx equipment. 

11
### §204. Examinations

The Comptroller of the Currency (in consultation with the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation when the Corporation is appointed conservator) is authorized to examine and supervise the bank in conservatorship as long as the bank continues to operate as a going concern. The Comptroller may use reports and other information provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for this purpose.

(Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, title II, §204, 48 Stat. 3; Pub. L. 101–73, title VIII, §803, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 443.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Comptroller of the Currency shall cause to be made such examinations of the affairs of such bank as shall be necessary to inform him as to the financial condition of such bank, and the examiner shall make a report thereon to the Comptroller of the Currency at the earliest practicable date."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exception as to Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by any provision of law in Comptroller of the Currency, referred to in this section, not included in transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 1 of this title.
### §1772b. Apportionment

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds received by the Board pursuant to any method provided by this chapter, and interest, dividend, or other income thereon, shall not be subject to apportionment for the purpose of chapter 15 of title 31 or under any other authority.

(June 26, 1934, ch. 750, title I, §128, as added Pub. L. 100–86, title V, §505(e), Aug. 10, 1987, 101 Stat. 633.)