alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007056EN.01002802.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/28

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 January 2007 — Lootus Teine Osaühing v Council

(Case T-127/05) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 - Fisheries - Fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 - Persons directly and individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2007/C 56/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lootus Teine Osaühing (Lootus) (Tartu, Estonia) (represented by: T. Sild and K. Martin, Lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. de Gregorio Merino, F. Ruggeri Laderchi and A. Westerhof Lörefflerova, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: L. Uibo and H. Prieß, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by K. Banks, Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment in part of, first, the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 of 20 December 2004 amending Regulations (EC) Nos 2340/2002 and 2347/2002 as concerns fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 (OJ 2004 L 396, p. 1) and, second, Part 2 of the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 of 22 December 2004 fixing for 2005 and 2006 the fishing opportunities for Community fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks (OJ 2004 L 396, p. 4), in so far as those provisions concern the fishing opportunities allocated to Estonia.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council.

| 3. | The Commission shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 115, 14.5.2005.

1

---
Cite as 2024 Ark. 4



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE ARKANSAS BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS Opinion Delivered : January 18, 2024

PER CURIAM

Leslie Fisken of Little Rock is appointed to the Arkansas Board of Law Examiners
for a six

- year term concluding on January 18 , 20 30 . M s. Fisken will be a representative of
the Second Congressional District and replaces Cristina Monterrey , whose term has expired

. Eric “Thad” Bishop of Ashdown is appointed to the Arkansas Board of Law
Examiners for a six

- year term concluding on January 18, 2030 . M r. Bishop will be a representative of the Fourth Congressional District and replaces Todd Turner, whose term has expired

. The c ourt extends its sincere appreciation to M s. Fisken and M r. Bishop for accepting appointment to this important b oard. The c ourt also expresses its gratitude to Ms. Monterrey
and Mr. Turner for their dedicated service to the b oard

.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.90 Does government-furnished real property to which an Indian tribe or tribal organization has taken title continue to be eligible for facilities operation and maintenance funding from the Secretary?

Yes.
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Civil Rights 

# In This Section

                      -  Employee Services                          -  Overview 
                        -  Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) 
                        -  Minority Serving Institutions Program 
                        -  No FEAR Act 
                        -  Special Emphasis Programs 
                      -  Public Services                          -  Overview 
                        -  Small Business Utilization in Federal Projects 
                        -  Environmental Justice 
                        -  Limited English Proficiency 
                      -  Grant Recipient Information 
                      -  PHMSA Office of Civil Rights 

## Contact Us

Office of Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.civilrights@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-9638****Fax:**202-366-0506**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Special Emphasis Programs

## Overview

The major goals of PHMSA's Special Emphasis Programs are to eliminate discriminatory policies and practices, and to identify and resolve barriers to full employment of a protected class. These programs are to ensure equal representation throughout PHMSA, to address issues critical to increasing productivity, and to increase our diverse workforce.

Three special emphasis program areas are specifically required by regulation.
                      - Hispanic Employment Program
                      - Federal Women's Program
                      - People with Disabilities Program

In addition, OCR identifies with other programs, which include: the Black Employment Program; the Asian/Pacific Islander Program; and the Native American Program.

The **SEP Manager** also interfaces with community outreach programs and the recruitment and employment of college students.

## Hispanic Employment Program

OPM Hispanic Employment Initiative

DOT Hispanic Employment Program

## Federal Women's Programs

National Women's History Project Program

Federally Employed Women

U.S. Department of Labor: Women's Bureau

U.S. Office of Personnel Management: Women in the Federal Government

## People with Disabilities Program

American Association of People with Disabilities

Disability Resource Center

## Asian American and Pacific Islander

Asian American Government Executives Network

Federal Asian Pacific American Council

## Black/African American

Blacks in Government

## American Indian

American Indian Heritage Foundation

Bureau of Indian Affairs
# CA2007022EN.01001801.xml

| 31.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 22/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 22/18

---

RESERVE LISTS
   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/44/06

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/44/06

LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD7)

LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD7)

WITH MAIN LANGUAGE ROMANIAN (RO)

WITH MAIN LANGUAGE ROMANIAN (RO)

(2007/C 22 A/08)

‘Court of Justice’ channel

| ARDELEAN | ALBA VERONICA |
| --- | --- |
| BADESCU | IONA CRISTINA |
| BADOI | CAMELIA |
| BARBU | ANDREEA |
| BRINZOIU | LAURENTIU |
| BUNDAN | ADRIANA MARIA |
| CAPET | OANA MARIA |
| COSCIUG | ANDREEA MARIA |
| DANCEANU | IRENA |
| DUMITRANA | ROMANA |
| FLOREA | ANDREI IONUT |
| GHEORGHE | RENATO |
| GOGOSANU | ALEXANDRU |
| HAMBASAN | MARIA ERIKA |
| JURCA | ELISABETA |
| MAUNA | CRISTINA |
| POPESCU | ANA SILVIA |
| POPESCU | VERONICA |
| RADULESCU | IULIA |
| ROMANESCU | DANA CARMEN |
| SAVU | TIBERIU GABRIEL |
| SOCACI | ROXANA |
| STANCU | HORIA |
| STEFANUC | ANDREI |
| TUDORICA | ADRIAN |

ARDELEAN

ALBA VERONICA

BADESCU

IONA CRISTINA

BADOI

CAMELIA

BARBU

ANDREEA

BRINZOIU

LAURENTIU

BUNDAN

ADRIANA MARIA

CAPET

OANA MARIA

COSCIUG

ANDREEA MARIA

DANCEANU

IRENA

DUMITRANA

ROMANA

FLOREA

ANDREI IONUT

GHEORGHE

RENATO

GOGOSANU

ALEXANDRU

HAMBASAN

MARIA ERIKA

JURCA

ELISABETA

MAUNA

CRISTINA

POPESCU

ANA SILVIA

POPESCU

VERONICA

RADULESCU

IULIA

ROMANESCU

DANA CARMEN

SAVU

TIBERIU GABRIEL

SOCACI

ROXANA

STANCU

HORIA

STEFANUC

ANDREI

TUDORICA

ADRIAN

‘Parliament, Council, Commission’ channel

| BĂLAN | ANGELA MARIANA |
| --- | --- |
| BOLOGA | CARMEN |
| BOUYON (RADU) | LUCIA |
| DIMA | EMILIAN |
| DIŢU | DOINA |
| DUMITRACHE | MIHAI ŞERBAN |
| DUMITRESCU | RALUCA |
| DUŢESCU | OANA DIANA |
| MEDELEANU (BÎSCÁ) | ALINA MONICA |
| MIRICESCU | JEAN-VIOREL |
| OPREA | MARIAN DAVID |
| ÖTVÖS | PATRICIA |
| POPESCU | ANDREEA ELENA |
| RĂDULEŢU | IONUŢ OCTAVIAN |
| ŞTEFĂNUC (STANCIU) | RALUCA |
| TELEA | FLORINA ROXANA |

BĂLAN

ANGELA MARIANA

BOLOGA

CARMEN

BOUYON (RADU)

LUCIA

DIMA

EMILIAN

DIŢU

DOINA

DUMITRACHE

MIHAI ŞERBAN

DUMITRESCU

RALUCA

DUŢESCU

OANA DIANA

MEDELEANU (BÎSCÁ)

ALINA MONICA

MIRICESCU

JEAN-VIOREL

OPREA

MARIAN DAVID

ÖTVÖS

PATRICIA

POPESCU

ANDREEA ELENA

RĂDULEŢU

IONUŢ OCTAVIAN

ŞTEFĂNUC (STANCIU)

RALUCA

TELEA

FLORINA ROXANA

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2007 and may be extended.

31 December 2007

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
#### § 276.17 Printing.

As permitted by paragraph 36-2(c) in the Government Printing and Binding Regulations (October 1974, No. 23), published by the Joint Committee on Printing (JCP), printing required by a grantee in performing work under a grant is considered “incidental printing” (e.g., material which the grantee needs to use to respond to the terms of the grant). Whenever the incidental printing is likely to exceed the exclusions in paragraphs 36-3 and 36-4 of the Joint Committee on Printing (JCP) Printing and Binding Regulations, specific provisions on printing as may be required shall be included in the grant agreement. Grantees shall be given the option of using sources other than the Government Printing Office for incidental printing.

[43 FR 37446, Aug. 23, 1978]
89–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–1022

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. 2796, THE WATER RESOURCES

DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2000

NOVEMBER 1, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 665]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 665, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report to accompany S. 2796, the Water Resources Development

Act of 2000, and against its consideration. The conference report

shall be considered as read.

Æ
#### § 115.162 Agency protection duties.

When an agency employee has a reasonable belief that a detainee is subject to a substantial risk of imminent sexual abuse, he or she shall take immediate action to protect the detainee.
# C_2006182EN.01001301.xml

| 4.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4232 — Scottish & Newcastle/Kuehne + Nagel/JV)

(2006/C 182/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4232. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4232. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS §

I NC

., §

§ No. 1 74 , 2014

Plaintiff

- Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below: Court of

§ Chancery of the State of

v. § Delaware

§

SPANISH BROADCASTING § Consol. C.A. No. 8321

- VC G

SYSTEM, INC., §

§

Defendant

- Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: December 10, 2014

Decided: December 1 1 , 2014

Before STRINE , Chief Justice ; HOLLAND

, RIDGELY

, and VA UGHN

, Justices; SILVERM AN , Judge,  constituting the Court en Banc

.

O R D E R

In this appeal, the plaintiff and appellant, Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.,

argues that the Court of Chancery erred in finding that the doctrine of acquiescence

barred its claims. T he defendant and appellee , Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.,

argues that the C o urt of Chancery was correct in dismissing Lehman ’ s claims, and

also urges alternative grounds of affirman ce, including that the doctrine of laches

bar s the claims

, and that the underlying C erti ficate of D esignation cannot

 Sitting by designation under Del. Const. art. IV, § 12.2

reasonably be read in a manner that expands the scope of preferential right s given

to preferred stockholders like Lehman

.

We have carefully considered the arguments of the parties and find no error

in the Court of Chancery ’ s de termination that acquiescence barred Lehman ’ s

claims, given the undisputed facts of record. 1 We therefore affirm that

determination substantially for the reasons stated in the Court of Chancery ’ s

decision of February 25, 2014

. In so affirming, however, we do not imply any

agreement or disagreement with the Court of Chancery ’ s determination that the

doctrine of laches itself did not bar Lehman from proceeding

. Because the Court

of Chancery did not err in applying the theory it d id, we need not and do not reach

that issue or Spanish Broadcasting System ’ s other asserted bases for affirmance,

including its argument that the plaintiffs ’ contract claim is substantively without

merit.

For these reasons, the judgment of the Court of Ch ancery is AFFIRMED. IT

IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice

1 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund, Inc. v. Spanish

Broadcasting System, Inc. , Consol. C.A. No. 8321 (Del. Ch. Feb. 25, 2014).
#### STATE v. HAMILTON

No. 56P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 143

Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 10 May 1990. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
268 Canal Rd Waterloo, SC 29384 Tel: ( 864) 980

- 8881 Fax: ( 864) 998

- 3407 ctdevon@embarqmail.com

30 th April 2015 Dear Sirs, I am writing to file a petition for an exemption under section 333. I would like to use a UAS for the purposes of Real Es tate Photography. Aircraft

– DJI Phantom 2 Quadcopter operating on 5.8 GHz Control frequency. Aircraft will be operated in GPS mode that will limit altitude and operation al flight radius automatically. Maxim um altitude s et to 400 ft as per FAA ruling. Maxim um Radius set to 400 ft due to keeping aircraft in visual line of sight. Payload

– GoPro3 Camera on Gimbal mount, WiFi operating on 2.4 GHz. Operation

– As is the case with any Aircraft , I will conduct a pre

- flight procedure

. Regarding the DJI phantom 2

- before take

- off the Aircraft must be inspected to ensure that it is in airworthy condition. The radio c ontrol transmitter must be set up correctly , all switches correctlt configured . The aircraft must obtain a reliable GPS lock to ensure correct operation of in

- flight stabilization and ‘Return Home’ function in event of transmitter malfunction. Flights will only be conducted in calm and fine weather conditions. Operation will be avoided if there are too many obstacles in the area. Most photography will be executed from an altitude of less than 80 ft AGL. (We have been using a telescoping mast for 3 years that delivers satisfactory results from a 40 ft elevation .) Occasional operation to maximum allowed altitude of 400 ft AGL, mainly for large agricultural or commercial properties. Maxim um speed not in excess of 5 knots, most photography is conducted using a walk behind the aircraft method and then adjusting Altitude and Lateral location to achieve the desired Photograph.I agree to abide by FAA rules reg arding Airport proximity and designated no

- fly

zones. All operations will be conducted in a safe manner, any persons on the property will be indoors or behind operator location. Operations will only be conducted with permission from property owners. Thank you for your consideration. Regards. Chris Thompson Birdseye Pix and VT
Contract Amendment to the Purchase Contract No.06.7IC014



 Exhibit 10.40 
 Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the 
 Securities and Exchange Commission.
Asterisks denote omissions. 
 Contract Amendment to the Purchase Contract No. 
 06.7IC014 
 for the Core Components
of the Electrical Control System of 
 FL 1500 Wind Turbine 
 This contract is made according to the purchase contract for FL1500 WT core components of electrical control system. 
 This
contract is made and amended according to the delivery quantities for the core components of electrical system signed between Sinovel Wind Co., Ltd and Windtec Windtec Systemtechnik Handels GmbH in 2007. 
 Apart from the following amendment, all other terms and conditions remain the same as what are stated in the original contract. 
 Quantity: Purchase another [**] sets of core components on the basis of the original purchasing quantity [**] sets, the unit price of each set remains unchanged.

 Delivery: The delivery time of the original [**] sets remains unchanged; the delivery time for additional [**] sets will be made according to the delivery
time (FOB) as follows: 
  

							
	 	 	 FOB date
	  	 Quantity (Sets)
	  	 
		 	Jul 20,2007	  	[**]	  	
		 	Aug 20,2007	  	[**]	  	
		 	Sep 20,2007	  	[**]	  	
		 	Oct 20,2007	  	[**]	  	
		 	Nov 20,2007	  	[**]	  	
		 	Dez 20,2007	  	[**]	  	
		 	 Total
	  	[**]	  	









			
	Buyer:	  	Sinovel Wind Co., Ltd


			
		
	Address:	  	Culture Building No. 59, Zhongguancun Street, Haidian, Beijing, China,
	Postcode:	  	100872


			
	Fax:	  	( 0086 ) 10-82500072     Tel:  ( 0086) 10-62515566


					
			
	Authorized representative:	  	 /s/ [Illegible]
	  	
		  	(Signature)	  	


			
		
	Signing date:	  	2007.03.06

  

					
	Buyer’s Agent:	  	Dalian Huarui Heavy Industry International Co., Ltd


					
	Address:	  	12/F Huarui Building, No. 169, Bayi Road, Xigang Dist., Dalian, China


					
	Fax:	  	(0086)411-86852398    Tel:  (0086)411-86852376


							
			
	Authorized representative:	  	 /s/ [Illegible]
	  	
		  	(Signature)	  	


							
			
	Signing date:	  	  
	  	

  

					
	Seller:	  	Windtec Systemtechnik Handels GmbH	  	


					
	Address:	  	Schleppeplatz 5, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria


					
	Fax:	  	(0043)463-4446044    Tel: (0043) 463-444604-0


					
			
	Authorized representative:	  	 /s/ [Illegible]
	  	
		  	(Signature)


					
		
	Signing date:	  	Feb. 14th, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10875-10876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-898]


Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People's Republic of China: 
Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: February 28, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 28, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
initiated the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
chlorinated isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from the People's Republic 
of China (PRC) covering the period June 1, 2009, through May 31, 2010. 
See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews and Requests for Revocations in Part, 75 FR 44224 (July 28, 
2010). The current deadline for the preliminary results of review is 
March 2, 2011.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), the Department shall make a preliminary 
determination in an administrative review of an antidumping duty order 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the date 
of publication of the order. The Act further provides, however, that 
the Department may extend that 245-day period to 365 days if it 
determines it is not practicable to complete the review within the 
foregoing time period.
    The Department finds that it is not practicable to complete the 
preliminary

[[Page 10876]]

results of the administrative review of chlorinated isos from the PRC 
within this time limit. Specifically, due to additional time needed to 
review the first supplemental questionnaire response and to issue 
further supplemental questionnaires, we find that additional time is 
needed to complete these preliminary results. Therefore, in accordance 
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is extending the 
time period for completion of the preliminary results of this review 
from 245 days to 365 days; from March 2, 2011 until June 30, 2011.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: February 22, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-4397 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
### §1756a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 22, 1942, ch. 516, 56 Stat. 700, which authorized reimbursement of Farm Credit Administration personnel for use of private automobiles for examining, supervising, and servicing Federal credit unions, was from the Department of Agriculture Appropriation Act, 1943, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in act July 1, 1941, ch. 267, 55 Stat. 444, the Department of Agriculture Appropriation Act, 1942.