alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 617 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 304
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 617

                          [Report No. 106-953]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 4461) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
    Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
 programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 10, 2000

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 4461) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
    Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
 programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other
                               purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4461) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food 
and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

                                                 House Calendar No. 304

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 617

                          [Report No. 106-953]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 4461) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
    Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
 programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 10, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 78 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 78

   Electing members of the Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint 
                 Committee of Congress on the Library.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1999

 Mr. Thomas submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Electing members of the Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint 
                 Committee of Congress on the Library.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected to the following joint committees of Congress, to serve with 
the chairman of the Committee on House Administration:
    Joint Committee of Congress on the Library: Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
Ehlers, Mr. Davis of Florida, and Mr. Hoyer.
    Joint Committee on Printing: Mr. Boehner, Mr. Ney, Mr. Fattah, and 
Mr. Hoyer.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

Certifications

I, Kent Heyman, President, Principal Executive Officer of ServiceWare
Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ServiceWare
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2004                     /s/ Kent Heyman
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Title: Principal Executive Officer

                                       27
# C_2007042EN.01004501.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/45

---

Order of the Court of First Instance/Second Chamber of 1 December 2006 — Neoperl v OHIM (Representation of a sanitary pipe)

(Case T-97/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 42/78)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court of First Instance/Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.

1

---
polid stid cyid year sector adjacee

NH3 39 167 2007 MOVES 36.42648898 Sector Ammonia NH3 39 167 2007area 20.07510469 Point 527.75 NH3 39 167 2007egu_point 2.233584158 Area 711.50 NH3 39 167 2007marairrail 0.272404908 Non-road 0.63 NH3 39 167 2007nh3 691.4237723 On-road 36.43 NH3 39 167 2007nonegu_pt 525.5129291 Total 1276.30 NH3 39 167 2007nonroad 0.35746574 1,276.30 ROG 39 167 2007area 1267.639777 ROG 39 167 2007egu_point 117.715404 ROG 39 167 2007marairrail 11.64997718 ROG 39 167 2007nonegu_pt 505.4781009 ROG 39 167 2007nonroad 441.1779883 TOG 39 167 2007 MOVES 945.6574558 3,289.32 Emissions in tons per yearVOC

623.19 1267.64 452.83 945.66 3289.32
### SERVED JANUAR Y 15,201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N ..^^nr-.n '

OFFIC E O FHEARING S DFP T Crj::^'i!;:V^'i'^''^'' ' WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTE RO F 

### EVERGREE N HELICOPTER S O FALASK A FA A DOCKE T NO . CP09AL001 0 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DMSNo . FAA-2009-084 1 

### NOTIC E O FHEARIN GDATE S NOTIC E I S HEREB Y GIVE N that testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e hear dan dconsidere d o n Jun e 2 3 an d24 , 2010 , a t th e U.S . Distric t

Cour t fo r th e Distric t

o f Alaska , 22 2 W . 7" " Avenue , Anchorage , Alask a99513. ' Hearing s wil l commenc e a t 9:0 0 a.m . an dconclud e a t 4:3 0 p.m . eac hday . Th e partie s shoul dvacat e th e courthous e o n o r before 5:0 0 p.m . eac hday . Settle dcase s wil l no t b e remove dfro mth e docke t unti l th e Judg e receive s th e prope r pleading(s) . Pleading s ma y b e forwarde db y fax , expres s mail , courie r o r posta l service . S O ORDERED .
Richar dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

' Th e partie s ar e advise dt o checi c wit hth e Clerk' s offic e t o confir mth e exac t

courtroo mon th e day o f

th e hearing .FA A Docke t No . CP09AL001 0 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Marc G . Wilhelm , Respondent' s Counse l Richmon d& Quii mP C Attorney s at

La w 36 0 K Street , Suit e 20 0 Anchorage , A K

99501-203 8 TEL : 907-276-572 7 FAX : 907-276-295 3 Gler mH . Brown , Complainant' s Counse l Senio r Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Coimsel , AAL- 7 Alaskan Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 22 2 Wes t 7* ^ Avenue , #1 4 Anchorage , A K

99513-758 7 TEL : 907-271-526 9 FAX : 907-271-280 0 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-51,2 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
§ 126.31 Administration of proceedings. ( a ) A TSOB Review Panel has authority to govern the conduct of its proceedings and internal operations by establishing any additional rules or procedures that are not inconsistent with this part.
( b ) If TSA withdraws its Determination of Security Threat at any time after a notice of appeal has been filed pursuant to § 126.13(a), the proceedings before the TSOB Review Panel are rendered moot and closed. TSA must file a notice of withdrawal of the Determination of Security Threat with the TSOB Docket Clerk within five calendar days of such withdrawal.
( c ) TSOB Review Panel proceedings will generally be closed to the public. A TSOB Review Panel may, in its discretion, open its proceedings to the public. Classified information, SSI, or other protected information shall not be disclosed during administrative proceedings, in accordance with § 126.25(d).
**EXHIBIT12.1**

 

**Digital River, Inc. Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (in thousands, except ratios)**

 
| ** **                                     | ** ** | **Years ended December 31** | ** ** | **June 30,  2005** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|------------|--------------------|------------|
| ** **                                     | ** ** | **2001**                    | ** ** | **2002**           | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | ** ** |
| Net Income (Loss) from operations as  reported |       | $                           | (20,103    | )                  | $          | (916 | ) | $ | 16,298 |   | $ | 34,762 |   | $ | 32,347 |   |
| Add: Fixed charges                             |       | 137                         |       | 165                |       | 235 |   | 2,094 |   | 1,509 |   |
|                                           |       |                        |       |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings as defined                            |       | (19,966                     | )          | (751               | )          | 16,533 |   | 36,856 |   | 33,856 |   |
|                                           |       |                        |       |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges                                  |       | $                           | 137        |               | $          | 165 |   | $ | 235 |   | $ | 2,094 |   | $ | 1,509 |   |
|                                           |       |                        |       |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)         |       | —                      |       | —             |       | 70.5 |   | 17.6 |   | 22.4 |   |

 

----

(1) The ratio of earnings tofixed charges is computed by dividing income (loss) from operations plus fixedcharges by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortizationof debt issuance costs and that portion of rental payments under operatingleases that we believe to be representative of interest. Earnings wereinsufficient to cover fixed charges in 2001 through 2002 by amounts equal tothe net loss for the period.

 

1

----
§ 111.16 The probable cause to believe recommendation; briefing procedures (52 U.S.C. 30109 (a)(3)). ( a ) Upon completion of the investigation, the General Counsel shall prepare a brief setting forth his or her position on the factual and legal issues of the case and containing a recommendation on whether or not the Commission should find probable cause to believe that a violation has occurred or is about to occur.
( b ) The General Counsel shall notify each respondent of the recommendation and provide a copy of his or her brief.
( c ) Within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the General Counsel's brief, respondent may file a brief with the Commission Secretary, setting forth respondent's position on the factual and legal issues of the case.
( d ) After reviewing the respondent's brief, the General Counsel shall advise the Commission in writing whether he or she intends to proceed with the recommendation or to withdraw the recommendation from Commission consideration.
[45 FR 15120, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 50778, Dec. 12, 1985; 82 FR 60853, Dec. 26, 2017; 89 FR 217, Jan. 2, 2024]
# C_2006260EN.01000601.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 October 2006

(2006/C 260/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2683 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 150,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4547 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67060 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2215 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5911 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,57 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3110 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5768 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,410 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 261,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8781 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5205 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,62 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 36,380 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8403 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6561 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4262 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8699 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9279 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9837 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 201,52 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5450 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0064 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3660 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 547,87 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6312 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,149 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9773 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,764 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2683

JPY

Japanese yen

150,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4547

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67060

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2215

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5911

ISK

Iceland króna

86,57

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3110

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5768

CZK

Czech koruna

28,410

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

261,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8781

RON

Romanian leu

3,5205

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,62

SKK

Slovak koruna

36,380

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8403

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6561

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4262

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8699

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9279

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9837

KRW

South Korean won

1 201,52

ZAR

South African rand

9,5450

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0064

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3660

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 547,87

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6312

PHP

Philippine peso

63,149

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9773

THB

Thai baht

46,764

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-2263 

LT Case No. 2017-CF-479

_____________________________ 

GREGORY ALAN PUTZKE, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County. 

Mary Hatcher, Judge. 

Gregory Alan Putzke, Bushnell, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

November 7, 2023 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

MAKAR, HARRIS, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
§ 227.19 Division orders. ( a ) Lessees may make arrangements with the purchasers of oil for the payment of the royalties on production to the superintendent by such purchasers, but such arrangements, if made, shall not operate to relieve a lessee from responsibility should the purchaser fail or refuse to pay such royalties when due. Where lessees avail themselves of this privilege, division orders permitting the pipeline companies or other purchasers of the oil to withhold the royalty interest shall be executed and forwarded to the supervisor for approval, as pipeline companies are not permitted to accept or run oil from leased Indian lands until after the approval of a division order showing that the lessee has a lease regularly approved and in effect. When the lessee company runs its own oil, it shall execute an intracompany division order and forward it to the supervisor for his consideration. The right is reserved for the supervisor to cancel a division order at any time or require the pipeline company to discontinue to run the oil of any lessee who fails to operate the lease properly or otherwise violates the provisions of the lease, of the regulations in this part, or of the operating regulations.
( b ) When oil is taken by authority of a division order, the lessee or his representatives shall be actually present when the oil is gaged and records are made of the temperature, gravity and impurities. The lessee will be held responsible for the correctness and the correct recording and reporting of all the foregoing measurements, which except lowest gage, shall be made at the time the oil is turned into the pipeline. Failure of the lessee to perform properly these duties will subject the division order to revocation.

Cross Reference:
For oil and gas operating regulations of the Geological Survey, see 30 CFR part 221.
# C_2007095EN.01001601.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Efetio Athinon (Greece) lodged on 5 February 2007 — Motosikletistiki Omospondia Ellados (MOT.O.E) v Elliniko Dimosio

(Case C-49/07)

(2007/C 95/27)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Diikitiko Efetio Athinon

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Motosikletistiki Omospondia Ellados (MOT.O.E)

Applicant:

Respondent: Elliniko Dimosio (Greek State)

Respondent:

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Articles 82 and 86 of the EC Treaty be interpreted so as also to include within their scope the activity of a legal person which has the status of national representative of the Fédération Internationale de Motocyclisme (the International Motorcycling Federation) and engages in economic activity as described above by entering into sponsorship, advertising and insurance contracts, in the context of the organisation of motor sport events by it? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Articles 82 and 86 of the EC Treaty be interpreted so as also to include within their scope the activity of a legal person which has the status of national representative of the Fédération Internationale de Motocyclisme (the International Motorcycling Federation) and engages in economic activity as described above by entering into sponsorship, advertising and insurance contracts, in the context of the organisation of motor sport events by it?

| 2. | Should the answer be in the affirmative, is Article 49 of Law 2696/1999, which, in relation to issue by the competent national public authority (in the present case, the Ministry for Public Order) of permission to organise a motor-vehicle competition, gives the foregoing legal person the power to provide a concurring opinion as to the holding of the competition without that power being made subject to restrictions, obligations and review, compatible with those provisions of the Treaty? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Should the answer be in the affirmative, is Article 49 of Law 2696/1999, which, in relation to issue by the competent national public authority (in the present case, the Ministry for Public Order) of permission to organise a motor-vehicle competition, gives the foregoing legal person the power to provide a concurring opinion as to the holding of the competition without that power being made subject to restrictions, obligations and review, compatible with those provisions of the Treaty?

---
### §2202c. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(23), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4682

Section, Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.14C, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title I, §102(a), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1578; amended Pub. L. 100–399, title I, §102(h), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 990, related to review of restructuring denials and establishment of a National Special Asset Council.
#### § 89.35 Execution in quintuplet.

The contract should be executed in quintuplet, and all copies of it shall be transmitted by the Superintendent to the Area Director.

[37 FR 10440, May 23, 1972. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Manchester United plc (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
30 June 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel Glazer, Executive Co-Chairman of the Company and Principal Executive Officer, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Date:
15 September 2016

By:

/s/ JOEL GLAZER Joel Glazer Executive Co-Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks