alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**VitalImages, Inc.**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

In connection with thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Vital Images, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Annual Report”), I, Jay D.Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.               The Annual Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | March 16, 2006     |   | /s/ Jay D. Miller |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|-------------------|
|   | Jay D. Miller           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Vital Images, Inc. |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 21.1




                      TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

                            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


                                                               State of
Subsidiary                                                   Incorporation
----------                                                   -------------

Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc.                          California

   Toyota Motor Insurance Agency of Ohio, Inc.                 Ohio

   Toyota Motor Insurance Services of Kentucky, Inc.           Kentucky

   Toyota Motor Insurance Services of Rhode Island, Inc.       Rhode Island

   Toyota Motor Insurance Services of Wyoming, Inc.            Wyoming

Toyota Motor Insurance Corporation of Vermont                  Vermont

Toyota Motor Insurance Company                                 Iowa

Toyota Motor Life Insurance Company                            Iowa

Toyota Motor Credit Receivables Corporation                    California

Toyota Credit De Puerto Rico Corp.                             California

Toyota Leasing, Inc.                                           California
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*Arthur Lee Johnson, Defendant-Appellee.

(No. 12269;

Fourth District

January 28, 1975.

*1049John E. Gambill, of Rantoul, for appellant.

No appearance for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SMITH.
§ 145.12 Inspections. ( a ) Each participating hatchery shall be audited at least one time annually or a sufficient number of times each year to satisfy the Official State Agency that the operations of the hatchery are in compliance with the provisions of the Plan.
( b ) The records of all flocks maintained primarily for production of hatching eggs shall be made available to and examined annually by a State Inspector. Records shall include VS Form 9-2, “Flock Selecting and Testing Report”; VS Form 9-3, “Report of Sales of Hatching Eggs, Chicks, and Poults”; set and hatch records; egg receipts; and egg/chick orders or invoices. Records shall be maintained for 3 years. On-site inspections of flocks and premises will be conducted if the State Inspector determines that a breach of sanitation, blood testing, or other provisions has occurred for Plan programs for which the flocks have or are being qualified.
[36 FR 23112, Dec. 3, 1971, as amended at 40 FR 1501, Jan. 8, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 61586, Oct. 26, 1979, and amended at 54 FR 23955, June 5, 1989; 59 FR 12798, Mar. 18, 1994; 72 FR 1418, Jan. 12, 2007; 81 FR 53249, Aug. 12, 2016]
# C_2007082EN.01002803.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 1 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-259/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/59)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 29.7.2006.

1

---
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 9:44 AM

To: 'Drukse@comcast.net'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: QCRD, LLC (Docket No. FAA-2015-1229)

July 27, 2015 

Dear Mr. Rukse: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1229). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing,rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by August 10, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Foamex  International  Inc. on Form
10-K for the  period  ended  January 1, 2006 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, K. Douglas  Ralph,
Executive Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer of Foamex  International
Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of Foamex
     International Inc.


/s/ K Douglas Ralph
--------------------------------
K. Douglas Ralph
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
April 3, 2006
### §4587. Notice of service

Any service required or authorized to be made by the Director under this subpart may be made by registered mail or in such other manner reasonably calculated to give actual notice, as the Director may by regulation or otherwise provide.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title XIII, §1347, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3968; Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title I, §1130(e)(3)(D), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2711.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–289 substituted "Director" for "Secretary" in two places in text.
### §9222. Rank: commissioned officers serving under temporary appointments

The President may, in accordance with the needs of the Air Force or the Space Force, adjust dates of rank of commissioned officers of the Air Force or the Space Force serving in temporary grades.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 529, §8572; renumbered §9222, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(6), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3811.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8572 | 10:506d(c) (last sentence). | Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 512, §515(c) (last sentence), 61 Stat. 907. |

The word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity, since the source statute related only to commissioned officers. The words "in his discretion, from time to time" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted "or the Space Force" after "the Air Force" in two places.

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8572 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-4989

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHANNON NICKORY MATHIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-381) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 22, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin T. Stepp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Shannon Nickory Mathis appeals from his conviction and sentence imposed for possession with intent to distribute “crack” cocaine. We affirm. Mathis’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), concluding that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but raising the issues of whether the district court complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 when it accepted Mathis’s guilty plea and whether the district court properly applied the United States Sentencing Guidelines to the factual findings made at sentencing. Our review of the record reveals that the district court was in compliance with Rule 11 and properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines in its imposition of sentence. Pursuant to Anders , this court has reviewed the record for potential error and has found none. Accordingly, we affirm. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petitionbe filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in3 the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 112.9 Biological products imported for research and evaluation. A biological product imported for research and evaluation under a permit issued in accordance with § 104.4, with the exception of products imported under § 104.4(d), shall be labeled as provided in this section. ( a ) The label shall identify the product and the name and address of the manufacturer and shall provide instructions for proper use of the product, including all warnings and cautions needed by the permittee to safely use the product.
( b ) Labels on each product to be further distributed in accordance with § 103.3 shall bear the statement “Notice! For Experimental Use Only—Not for Sale!”
( c ) The labeling shall contain any other information deemed necessary by the Administrator and specified on the permit.
[50 FR 46417, Nov. 8, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 66784, Dec. 26, 1991]
# C_2007086EN.01001701.xml

| 20.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 April 2007

(2007/C 86/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3601 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 160,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4527 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2195 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6343 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,41 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1075 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5813 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,020 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,02 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7042 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8097 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3370 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,566 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8460 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6336 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5312 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6268 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8367 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0554 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 263,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6564 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4952 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4106 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 380,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6617 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,666 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0180 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3601

JPY

Japanese yen

160,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4527

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67930

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2195

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6343

ISK

Iceland króna

88,41

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1075

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5813

CZK

Czech koruna

28,020

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,02

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7042

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8097

RON

Romanian leu

3,3370

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,566

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8460

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6336

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5312

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6268

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8367

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0554

KRW

South Korean won

1 263,87

ZAR

South African rand

9,6564

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4952

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4106

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 380,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6617

PHP

Philippine peso

64,666

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0180

THB

Thai baht

44,200

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Gormas, Michael (OST) 

From: Gormas, Michael (OST) 

Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 11:21 AM 

To: 

Cc: 

'Aike, Debbie'; 'jkadlec@mt.gov'; 'bschmier@townofwestyellowstone.com' 

Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Essential Air Service at West Yellowstone, Montana 

Attachments: SkyWest West Yellowstone proposal December 2014.pdf 

Contacts: Debbie Alke - MDT Aeronautics 

Hello everyone, 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at West Yellowstone, MT as well as give you an 

opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs. 

We issued Order 2014-11-2 (November 5, 2014), requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EAS. In 

response to our request, we received one proposal from SkyWest Airlines. 

I have attached the proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov soon. I request 

that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than Monday, 

January 19, 2015. Please send your comments directly via e-mail to michael.gormas@dot.gov. Also, please forward this 

to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list. 

Please direct all questions regarding this proposal to Michael Gormas at michael.gormas@dot.gov. 

Best Regards, 

Michael D. Gormas 

United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

202.366.1853 

1 

; 

~····· ' 

... .)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 11 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 11

                    For the relief of Wei Jingsheng.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

  Mr. Abraham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Wei Jingsheng.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Wei Jingsheng 
Freedom of Conscience Act''.
    (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Wei Jingsheng 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Wei Jingsheng as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by one during the current fiscal year the total 
number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the 
alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7908

FERMAN ALVIN RUPPE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director, VDOC; FRED SCHILLING,

Director; HAPPY SMITH, Dr., WRSP; G. HOBBS,

Nurse, LPN, WRSP; NURSE HILLMAN, WRSP; NURSE

MULLINS, WRSP; S. K. YOUNG, Warden, WRSP;

NURSE HENSLEY, WRSP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (CA-03-581-7)

Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 4, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ferman Alvin Ruppe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ferman Alvin Ruppe, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find the district court

did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. See Ruppe v. Johnson, No.

CA-03-581-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
- Home
- Regulations and Compliance

# PHMSA Guidance

Although some of the materials that can be accessed from this page may fall outside the definitions of “guidance” set forth in 49 CFR 5.25(c), PHMSA has determined that they include potentially useful information for stakeholders and is including them in this database in an effort to make these materials easier for members of the public to find. You may also find useful information that is potentially not accessed from the page in the links below:
                      - PHMSA FAQs
                      - PHMSA Advisory Bulletins
                      - Pipeline Enforcement Guidance
                      - Pipeline Glossary
                      - Pipeline Guidance Manuals
                      - Pipeline Operator Resources
                      - Pipeline Technical Resources
                      - Hazardous Materials Publications
                      - Hazardous Materials Safety Field Operations and Enforcement Guidance
                      - Hazardous Materials Emergency Waivers

Members of the public may submit comments on draft guidance documents noticed in the Federal Register through Regulations.gov. Comments on any guidance document; requests for issuance, reconsideration, modification, or rescission of any guidance document; or concerns about PHMSA’s compliance with the OMB Good Guidance Bulletin regarding existing guidance documents may be submitted to PHMSA_Guidance@dot.gov. Please identify the guidance document in your request.

**Search Instructions**
                      - To search for PHMSA Guidance Documents (not including Interpretations), use the Keywords or Issued Date fields on the left side of the search box below. Your search results will display in the table below.
                      - To search for PHMSA Regulations Interpretations, use the Interpretations Keyword Search on the right side of the search box, or click the “PHMSA Interpretations Advanced Search” link. Results using the Interpretations Keyword Search will open in a new browser window.

PHMSA Interpretations Advanced Search

# Pagination

-  «« First 
-  ‹‹‹ 
- …
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
-  10 
-  11 
- …
-  ››› 
-  »Last »
# C_2007130EN.01001602.xml

| 12.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/16

---

Call for proposals TREN/PIL/2007

(2007/C 130/08)

The Commission intends to award grants to a pilot project aiming at promoting secure rest places along the trans-European road network as announced in the DG TREN work programme for 2007. Information on this call for proposals is available on the following Internet address:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/grants/proposal_en.htm

---
§ 115.122 Policies to ensure investigation of allegations and appropriate agency oversight. ( a ) The agency shall establish a protocol to ensure that each allegation of sexual abuse is investigated by the agency, or referred to an appropriate investigative authority.
( b ) The agency protocol shall be developed in coordination with DHS investigative entities; shall include a description of the responsibilities of both the agency and the investigative entities; and shall require the documentation and maintenance, for at least five years, of all reports and referrals of allegations of sexual abuse. The agency shall post its protocol on its Web site, redacted if appropriate.
( c ) The agency protocol shall ensure that each allegation is promptly reported to the Joint Intake Center and, unless the allegation does not involve potentially criminal behavior, promptly referred for investigation to an appropriate law enforcement agency with the legal authority to conduct criminal investigations. The agency may separately, and in addition to the above reports and referrals, conduct its own investigation.
( d ) The agency shall ensure that all allegations of detainee sexual abuse are promptly reported to the PSA Coordinator and to the appropriate offices within the agency and within DHS to ensure appropriate oversight of the investigation.
( e ) The agency shall ensure that any alleged detainee victim of sexual abuse that is criminal in nature is provided timely access to U nonimmigrant status information.