alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Intertek / ETL Semko

3933 U.S. Route 11, Cortland, NY 13045

Telephone (607) 758-6334 or (800) 345-3851 Fax (607) 758-6645 

http:\\www.etlcable.com

September 19, 2007

(Revised October 3, 2007)

Mr. Richard Maruya

A & S Trust and Holdings

Room Air Conditioner Test Plan for Refrigerant HCR188C

Intertek has selected a Haier America Room Air Conditioner, Model 

HWF05XC7, for testing with refrigerant HCR188C. The test sample has 

completed AHAM Certification testing. Haier America will need to confirm 

in writing that this sample can be used by Richard Maruya for this testing. 

The certified AHAM rating is 5,200 Btuh / 9.7 EER with R-22 refrigerant.

The nameplate R-22 refrigerant charge will be recorded. Test sample will be 

set up in the ASHRAE 16 facility and reclaimed of the production 

refrigerant. The test sample will then be evacuated of all remaining 

refrigerant by a vacuum pump. 20% of the original nameplate charge of the 

HCR188C refrigerant will initially be weighed into the test sample. The test 

facility and room air conditioner will be operated until steady state 

conditions are obtained at the AHAM RAC-1 Standard Rating Test 

Condition. The cooling capacity and EER will be started with a 20% 

refrigerant charge. The following refrigerant charging and test procedure 

was submitted by Margaret Sheppard, USEPA/Stratospheric Protection

Division. “The testing needs to continue beyond a refrigerant 

charge of 35% of nameplate charge until the EER falls for 

two consecutive charge values.

If the EER falls for two consecutive charge values before 

reaching 35%, then continue testing to 35% of nameplate 

charge. If the EER decreases compared to the trial at the 

previous charge, that is the first fall in EER.

If the EER value falls at 25% and at 30%, continue the test 

at 35%. If the EER has not started to decrease at 30% of 

nameplate charge, then continue testing at intervals of 5% 

of nameplate charge (35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, and so on), until 

the EER falls for two trials in a row. If the EER falls 

and then goes up again or remains constant for the next 

trial, continue testing until the EER falls for two trials 

in a row.”
A report will be issued stating the AHAM Certified performance of the test 

sample and the HCR188C performance and charge rates. 

Sincerely,

Robert J. Hill

Senior HVAC/R Engineer

Intertek ETL SEMKO
### §288. Cancellation of stock held by member bank on insolvency or discontinuance of banking operations for sixty days; repayment of cash-paid subscriptions

If any member bank shall be declared insolvent and a receiver appointed therefor, the stock held by it in said Federal reserve bank shall be canceled, without impairment of its liability, and all cash-paid subscriptions on said stock, with one-half of 1 per centum per month from the period of last dividend, if earned, not to exceed the book value thereof, shall be first applied to all debts of the insolvent member bank to the Federal reserve bank, and the balance, if any, shall be paid to the receiver of the insolvent bank.

If any national bank which has not gone into liquidation as provided in section 181 of this title, and for which a receiver has not already been appointed for other lawful cause, shall discontinue its banking operations for a period of sixty days the Comptroller of the Currency may, if he deems it advisable, appoint a receiver for such bank. The stock held by the said national bank in the Federal reserve bank of its district shall thereupon be canceled and said national bank shall receive in payment therefor, under regulations to be prescribed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, a sum equal to its cash-paid subscriptions on the shares canceled and one-half of 1 per centum a month from the period of the last dividend, if earned, not to exceed the book value thereof, less any liability of such national bank to the Federal reserve bank.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §6, 38 Stat. 258; Apr. 23, 1930, ch. 207, §1, 46 Stat. 250; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), title III, §319(b), 49 Stat. 704, 713.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1935—Act Aug. 23, 1935, §319(b), struck out provision requiring execution of certificate of reduction of capital stock.

1930—Act Apr. 23, 1930, among other changes, added second par.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exception as to Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by any provision of law in Comptroller of the Currency, referred to in this section, not included in transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 1 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 15.2




February 12, 1998



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that Toyota Motor Credit Corporation has incorporated by reference
our report dated February 12, 1998 (issued pursuant to the provisions of 
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 71) in the Prospectuses constituting part of
its Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-52359 and 333-26717).  We are 
also aware of our responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.

Yours very truly,



/S/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Wade Bryant

House, C. J., Shapiko, Loiselle, MacDonald and Bogdanski, Js.

Argued March 7

decision released March 26, 1974

*James N. Egan,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Arnold M. Schwolsky,*assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, was *John D. LaBelle,*state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Per Curiam.

On a trial to a jury, the defendant was found guilty of the crime of robbery with violence. The court denied the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict, and the defendant has appealed from the judgment as rendered on the verdict. The sole issue raised on the appeal is whether the evidence supports the verdict, it being the defendant’s claim that it does not and that, accordingly, the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury. Whether the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict is tested by the evidence printed in the .appendices to the briefs which must be given a construction most favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdict. *State*v. *Romano,*165 Conn. 239, 250, 332 A.2d 64; *State*v. *Benton,*161 Conn. 404, 406, 288 A.2d 411; *State*v. *Raffone,*161 Conn. 117, 121, 285 A.2d 323.

From the evidence offered, the jury could reasonably have found the following facts: On August 26, 1971, Fred Pilote was working as a gasoline *267station attendant in Newington and with him was a friend, Otilio Rodriguez. About 9 p.m., a man entered the well-lighted room and asked for an emergency gasoline can. Shortly thereafter, another man came in, drew a gun and demanded the “loot.” The first man removed the cash box and the second man frisked Pilote, taking his wallet and some money from his pockets. The second man then shot Pilote who was leaning across a desk with both hands on the window in front of him. The men then left the premises and Pilote, who was severely wounded, sent Rodriguez for help. The station was lighted by fluorescent lights running the entire length of the interior, and the entire transaction took about five minutes. Neither Pilote nor Rodriguez was able to identify the defendant among several photographs shown to them by the police during their investigation, but both made a positive in-court identification of the defendant as the man who had shot Pilote. A state’s witness, James Moore, who had pleaded guilty to the crime of robbery with violence, claimed that he had remained in the car while the defendant and another man, George Cole, entered the gas station. He testified that the defendant on returning to the car from the station stated that “he had shot the guy.” He also informed the police of the location where the cash box had been thrown from the car and the box was found there, as well as Pilote’s driver’s license.

On the basis of this evidence, the jury were amply justified in concluding that the state had proved the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt, and the court was not in error in refusing to set aside the verdict.

There is no error.
# C_2007072EN.01002702.xml

| 29.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/27

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4554 — Berkshire Hathaway/TTI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 72/09)

On 21 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4554. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4554. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### § 39.145 Can a school receive both a small school adjustment and a small high school adjustment?

A school that meets the criteria in § 39.140 can receive both a small school adjustment and a small high school adjustment. The following table shows the total amount of adjustments for eligible schools by average daily membership (ADM) category.

| ADM—entire school | ADM—high school
component | Small school adjustment | Small high school
adjustment | Total
adjustment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1-50 | NA | 12.5 | NA | 12.5 |
| 1-50 | 1-50 | 12.5 | 6.25 | 18.75 |
| 51-99 | 1-50 | 2 12.5-0.5 | 6.25 | 18.75-6.75 |
| 51-99 | 51-99 | 1 12.5-0.5 | 2 6.25-0.25 | 18.75-0.7 |
| 99 | 1-50 | 0.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
| 99 | 51-99 | 0.5 | 2 12.5-0.5 | 12.5-0.5 |

1 The amount of the adjustment is within this range. The exact figure depends upon the results obtained using the formula in § 39.141.

2 The amount of the adjustment is within this range. The exact figure depends upon the results obtained using the formula in § 39.144.
SERVE D JUN E 30 , 201 1 ^ ' ' ^I^-PORW!O N 

### ; :-'VOFERM;QN S

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTE RO F EMPIR E FLIGH T ACADEM Y FA A DOCKE T No . [T O B EASSIGNED ] FDM S No . FAA-2011-029 0 (Civil Penalt

y Case) 

### ORDE RDENYIN GMOTION S Responden t

Empir e Fligh t

Academ y ("Respondent" ) ha s filed aMotio n fo r Partia l Summary Judgmen t

an daMotion for

Decision . Complainant , th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant " o r "agency" ) ha s answere di n oppositio n t o each . Respondent' s motion s eac har e hereb y DENIED . Th e matte r

wil l procee di n accordanc e withth e Amende dProcedura l Orde r serve dJun e 24 , 2011 .
Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tW ' 1SS «



### on Administritfiot& l .1»»c e Avenue ; S.-W;&

f i> C 2059 1 

## H^ng D

R^H< " ^ ^ 

# m^ 

# i R m E^- ^ ^ ^ v 

# IP ' S^'- ' ^ P M - 

# W ' '''^tsm

m '•^'^^m ^ '^Y^^ls i > IB* ' 5
f'li^^HH H 

# ' . ^^ m • -•'•f'k^^ K • ^ SSTSSSJ^^ H f 'vWSKmtSM n 2**^^BMHV I ^^^felKMsBpBMM 

# ' ''^^»| w 

# "*^^feis La

w Fir m Co^irt , Suit e 45 0 ^S5 0 •i55 0 4-252 5 

### m German , Cfmplm i 'Rei^onal Counsel , fio n Admiflism^ion.; : Room56 i 1143 4 53425 8 

# ^c]j,\ ^ ,,,.,u! ^ jxr"^ * i^>- \- h ,i;. o gftv"- r

^l> ^ 

# p

^ ^ f 

## K'*' ^ R'- i 

# p . fo ^ ' ^ i * ' ' ^' - , 't ' • • s " - • 

### 5 - . . * •

S t $ 4f ^

i 

# f -/! * '?^ . ,r' / ! ^ \ . 

### t- * 

### , 1.1 . ' 1'^ ^ s ^j*C ,

S Ii 

# M i d 

# m

'•'•^• ' i^S i *:^k^ f 'iW h *^'^affl i ^^•i ^

•i? m


# m^ ^

• M "*<* ' 

# 1 1

* -V i 

# ^-4 i 1 # W 

### - . -ill;'-- -

-/ff . M 1 » X • ^ 

### w^ l . ' i 

### > . I ,*rfr ' ^

« *
Exhibit 12.2

CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO  COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS  (dollars in thousands)

Years Ended December 31,2004

2003

2002

2001

2000Available earnings:Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in net income of affiliate plus gains on sale of real estate

$
9,446

$
23,999

$
32,023

$
9,972

$
43,631Plus:Interest expense


33,032


25,735


27,456


32,299


32,915Amortization of deferred financing costs


3,567


3,354


2,918


2,376


2,155Distributed share of equity from affiliates


5,703


2,281


1,994


3,309


(294
)Available earnings

$
51,748

$
55,369

$
64,391

$
47,956

$
78,407Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends:Interest expense, including discontinued operations

$
33,032

$
27,596

$
30,452

$
32,299

$
32,915Amortization of deferred financing costs


3,567


3,354


2,918


2,376


2,155Preferred dividends


2,621


9,599


10,090


10,090


10,105Interest capitalized


6,586


8,569


8,444


7,154


3,404Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends

$
45,806

$
49,118

$
51,904

$
51,919

$
48,579Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred dividends


1.1


1.1


1.2


0.9


1.6


---



QuickLinks
### §3419. Suspension of limitations

If any individual files a motion or application under this chapter which has the effect of delaying the access of a Government authority to financial records pertaining to such individual, any applicable statute of limitations shall be deemed to be tolled for the period extending from the date such motion or application was filed until the date upon which the motion or application is decided.

(Pub. L. 95–630, title XI, §1119, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3709.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of 120 days after Nov. 10, 1978, see section 2101 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 375b of this title.
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
                                  on January 3, 1997

                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                               Washington, D.C.  20549

                                       FORM 15
               Certification and Notice of Termination of Registration 
                                 under Section 12(g)
                      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or 
           Suspension of Duty to File Reports Under Sections 13 and 15(d) 
                       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                       0-26656
                                Commission File Number

                         CARDIOTRONICS SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
                (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                               12050 Lone Peak Parkway
                                  Draper, Utah 84020
                 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
          including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)

                        Common, Series C Convertible Preferred
               (Title of each class of securities covered by this Form)

                                         None
          (Titles of all other classes of securities for which a duty to
          file reports under Section 13(a) or 15(d) remains)

          Please place an X in the box(es) to designate the appropriate
          rule provision(s) relied upon to terminate or suspend the duty to
          file reports:

               Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(i)      X         Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(ii)
               Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(ii)               Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(i)
               Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(i)                Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(ii)
               Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(ii)               Rule 15d-6
               Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(i)

          Approximate number of holders of record as of the certification
          or notice date:
                                         127

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
          1934 Cardiotronics Systems, Incorporated has caused this
          certification/notice to be signed on its behalf by the
          undersigned duly authorized person.

          January 3, 1997               By:  Dale H. Ballard, President
# C_2007082EN.01002101.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'Appel de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 5 February 2007 — Belgian State v Les Vergers du Vieux Tauves SA

(Case C-48/07)

(2007/C 82/38)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d'Appel de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Belgian State

Applicant:

Defendant: Les Vergers du Vieux Tauves SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Is the Law of 28 December 1992, which amended the wording of Article 202 of the 1992 Code of Taxation on Income by referring to Directive 90/435/EEC (1) and required that the beneficial owner of dividends have a holding of capital in the Company which distributed such dividend, in as much as that Law does not explicitly specify that the holding must be as full owner and therefore implicitly permits the interpretation made by the respondent, that the mere holding of a right of usufruct of shareholdings in the capital carries the right to tax exemption on such dividends, compatible with the provisions of that Directive concerning holdings in capital, and in particular with its Articles 3, 4 and 5?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States (OJ L 225, p. 6).

1

---
### §4701. Findings and purposes

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) many of the Nation's urban, rural, and Native American communities face critical social and economic problems arising in part from the lack of economic growth, people living in poverty, and the lack of employment and other opportunities;

(2) the restoration and maintenance of the economies of these communities will require coordinated development strategies, intensive supportive services, and increased access to equity investments and loans for development activities, including investment in businesses, housing, commercial real estate, human development, and other activities that promote the long-term economic and social viability of the community; and

(3) community development financial institutions have proven their ability to identify and respond to community needs for equity investments, loans, and development services.

#### (b) Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to create a Community Development Financial Institutions Fund to promote economic revitalization and community development through investment in and assistance to community development financial institutions, including enhancing the liquidity of community development financial institutions.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §102, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2163.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A of title I of Pub. L. 103–325, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2163, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this subtitle to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 103–325, §1(a), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2160, provided that: "This Act [see Tables for classification] may be cited as the 'Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994'."

Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §101, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2163, provided that: "This subtitle [subtitle A (§§101–121) of title I of Pub. L. 103–325, enacting this subchapter and section 1772c–1 of this title, amending sections 1766 and 1834a of this title, section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, section 11 of Pub. L. 95–452 set out in the Appendix to Title 5, section 657 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 9101 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 11 of Pub. L. 95–452 set out in the Appendix to Title 5] may be cited as the 'Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994'."
§ 115.131 Employee, contractor, and volunteer training. ( a ) The agency shall train, or require the training of all employees, contractors, and volunteers who may have contact with holding facility detainees, to be able to fulfill their responsibilities under these standards, including training on: ( 1 ) The agency's zero-tolerance policies for all forms of sexual abuse;
( 2 ) The right of detainees and employees to be free from sexual abuse, and from retaliation for reporting sexual abuse;
( 3 ) Definitions and examples of prohibited and illegal sexual behavior;
( 4 ) Recognition of situations where sexual abuse may occur;
( 5 ) Recognition of physical, behavioral, and emotional signs of sexual abuse, and methods of preventing such occurrences;
( 6 ) Procedures for reporting knowledge or suspicion of sexual abuse;
( 7 ) How to communicate effectively and professionally with detainees, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, or gender nonconforming detainees; and
( 8 ) The requirement to limit reporting of sexual abuse to personnel with a need-to-know in order to make decisions concerning the victim's welfare and for law enforcement or investigative purposes.
( b ) All current employees, contractors and volunteers who may have contact with holding facility detainees shall be trained within two years of the effective date of these standards, and the agency shall provide refresher information, as appropriate.
( c ) The agency shall document those employees who may have contact with detainees have completed the training and receive and maintain for at least five years confirmation that contractors and volunteers have completed the training.