alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§1131d to 1131g. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 1131d, acts June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title II, §20, 48 Stat. 259; July 26, 1956, ch. 741, title I, §105(f), 70 Stat. 665, authorized organization of production credit associations and provided for charters, bylaws, powers of governor, and other powers of such associations. See section 2093 of this title.

Section 1131e, acts June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title II, §21, 48 Stat. 260; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 785, title II, §201, 69 Stat. 663; July 26, 1956, ch. 741, title I, §105(g), 70 Stat. 665, provided for capital stock of production credit associations and its value, classes, voting rights, limitations on transfer, exchange, and dividends. See section 2094 of this title.

Section 1131e–1, acts Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §16, 67 Stat. 399; July 26, 1956, ch. 741, title I, §107(b), 70 Stat. 666; Oct. 17, 1968, Pub. L. 90–582, §2(b), 82 Stat. 1145, provided for issuance of class C stock for production credit associations and conditions, privileges, restrictions, limitations, and qualifications placed on such stock.

Section 1131f, acts June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title II, §22, 48 Stat. 261; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 785, title II, §202, 69 Stat. 663; July 26, 1956, ch. 741, title I, §105(h), 70 Stat. 665; Oct. 3, 1961, Pub. L. 87–343, §2(2), 75 Stat. 758; Oct. 4, 1965, Pub. L. 89–237, §2(a), 78 Stat. 924, covered application of earnings of production credit associations and restoration of capital, impairment, surplus account, distribution of earnings, and allocation on a patronage basis. See section 2095 of this title.

Section 1131g, acts June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title II, §23, 48 Stat. 261; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 785, title II, §204, 69 Stat. 663; July 26, 1956, ch. 741, title I, §105(i), 70 Stat. 665; Oct. 4, 1965, Pub. L. 89–237, §2(b), 79 Stat. 924; Dec. 15, 1967, Pub. L. 90–204, §3(a), 81 Stat. 612; June 18, 1968, Pub. L. 90–345, §2, 82 Stat. 183, authorized loans to farmers by production credit associations, terms and conditions, rates of interest, security, limitations on indebtedness, ownership of stock, and investments in equity reserve. See section 2096 of this title.
#### §§ 63.37-63.50 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.60 How does an Indian tribe or tribal organization dispose of Federal personal property? The Indian tribe or tribal organization shall report to the Secretary in writing any Federally-owned personal property that is worn out, lost, stolen, damaged beyond repair, or no longer needed for the performance of the contract. ( a ) The Indian tribe or tribal organization shall state whether the Indian tribe or tribal organization wants to dispose of or return the property.
( b ) If the Secretary does not respond within 60 days, the Indian tribe or tribal organization may return the property to the Secretary, who shall accept transfer, custody, control, and responsibility for the property (together with all associated costs).
# C_2006237EN.01001602.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/16

---

Action brought on 18 July 2006 — Colovea v European Parliament

(Case F-77/06)

(2006/C 237/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Fotini Colovea (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Choucroun, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the European Parliament′s decision of 20 September 2005, confirmed 19 April 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the European Parliament′s decision of 20 September 2005, confirmed 19 April 2006;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was recruited by the European Parliament as a member of the temporary staff at Grade B5 on 1 May 1981. On 4 August 2005 she introduced a request of to work part time in preparation for retirement, as provided for by Article 55a of the Staff Regulations and Article 4 of Annex IVa of the Staff Regulations. In the calculation of the percentage of the basic salary to which the applicant was entitled, the administration did not take into account the years of pensionable service that the applicant had acquired before being recruited by the European Parliament.

In support of his action, the applicant invokes three pleas in law:

| — | firstly, breach of Article 2 of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

firstly, breach of Article 2 of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations;

| — | secondly, breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials; |
| --- | --- |

—

secondly, breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials;

| — | thirdly, breach of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

—

thirdly, breach of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations.

---
### §2282. Definitions

For the purposes of this chapter—

(1) The term "Federal agency" means an executive department, an independent Federal establishment, or a corporation or other entity established by the Congress which is owned in whole or in part by the United States.

(2) The term "obligation" means any note, bond, debenture, or other evidence of indebtedness, but does not include Federal Reserve notes or stock evidencing an ownership interest in the issuing Federal agency.

(3) The term "guarantee" means any guarantee, insurance, or other pledge with respect to the payment of all or part of the principal or interest on any obligation, but does not include the insurance of deposits, shares, or other withdrawable accounts in financial institutions, or any guarantee or pledge arising out of a statutory obligation to insure such deposits, shares, or other withdrawable accounts.

(4) The term "Bank" means the Federal Financing Bank established by section 2283 of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–224, §3, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 937.)
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KAREN VATEL, Plaintiff,



### v. ALLIANCE OF AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS and DAVID K. McCURDY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### --------------------------) Civil Case No. 08cv467 (RJL)

ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT (January

### I~ ,2010) For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is hereby

### ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [# 

### 25] is GRANTED, and it is further 

### ORDERED thatjudgment is entered in favor ofthe defendants, and that the case is dismissed with prejudice. 

### SO ORDERED. 

# ,

# lx~ United States District Judge

-1-
### §216d. Severability

If any provision of this subchapter or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this subchapter and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 96–221, title VII, §735, as added Pub. L. 97–320, title IV, §408, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1515.)
# C_2007025DE.01000701.xml

| 3.2.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 25/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 25/7

---

Berichtigung der Mitteilung über die neuen nationalen Seiten von Euro-Münzen, die für den Umlauf bestimmt sind

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 316 vom 22. Dezember 2006
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 316 vom 22. Dezember 2006

(2007/C 25/07)

| 1. | S. 21 und 22, „Beschreibung der optischen Merkmale“, Absätze 1, 2 und 3: |
| --- | --- |

1.

S. 21 und 22, „Beschreibung der optischen Merkmale“, Absätze 1, 2 und 3:

anstatt:

anstatt:

„und dem Zeichen des Graveurs“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„und dem Zeichen des Chefgraveurs“.

| 2. | S. 21, „Beschreibung der optischen Merkmale“, „10 EURO CENT, 20 EURO CENT, 50 EURO CENT“: |
| --- | --- |

2.

S. 21, „Beschreibung der optischen Merkmale“, „10 EURO CENT, 20 EURO CENT, 50 EURO CENT“:

anstatt:

anstatt:

„das Monogramm des Prinzen Albert“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„das Monogramm des Fürsten Albert“.

| 3. | S. 22, „Beschreibung der optischen Merkmale“, „1 EURO, 2 EURO“: |
| --- | --- |

3.

S. 22, „Beschreibung der optischen Merkmale“, „1 EURO, 2 EURO“:

anstatt:

anstatt:

„ein Portrait von Prinz Albert“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„ein Portrait von Fürst Albert“.

---
# C_2007095EN.01005402.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/54

---

Action brought on 8 March 2007 — IXI Mobile v OHIM — Klein (IXI)

(Case T-78/07)

(2007/C 95/109)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: IXI Mobile, Inc (Redwood City, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jochen und Eckhard Klein GbR (Olching, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | The decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 11 January 2007 in Case R 796/2006-2 dismissing the appeal shall be annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 11 January 2007 in Case R 796/2006-2 dismissing the appeal shall be annulled;

| — | the Office and the other party shall bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

the Office and the other party shall bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘IXI ’for goods in class 9 — application No 723 140

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Jochen und Eckhard Klein GbR

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community word mark ‘ixi ’for goods in class 9

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld for all the contested goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The opponent did not adduce evidence of similarity between the respective goods; the Board of Appeal took an unduly broad view of the scope of protection of the earlier mark and failed to properly analyse the relevant factors governing the assessment of similarity of the respective goods. Furthermore, the Board of Appeal took the reasons for the applicant to select its mark into consideration, which the applicant submits is an irrelevant consideration.

Pleas in law:

---
#### Samuel H. Dick *v.*Jack E. Dick et al.

*Bichará A. Bieder,*in support of the motion.

Submitted March 20

decided April *2,*1974

The plaintiff’s motion to vacate the order dated February 25, 1974, extending the time to March 28, 1974, for the filing of briefs by the defendants in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted. See Practice Book § 665.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, April 21, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, April 21, 2011, at 11:30 a.m., Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: February 18, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-4324 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 502.11 House banking game.

*House banking game* means any game of chance that is played with the house as a participant in the game, where the house takes on all players, collects from all losers, and pays all winners, and the house can win.
#### § 81.56 Do petitions have a minimum or maximum number of pages?

A petition can have as many pages as necessary to obtain the required signatures. However, each page must have the information shown in § 81.58 of this subpart.
§ 502.12 Indian lands. *Indian lands* means: ( a ) Land within the limits of an Indian reservation; or
( b ) Land over which an Indian tribe exercises governmental power and that is either— ( 1 ) Held in trust by the United States for the benefit of any Indian tribe or individual; or
( 2 ) Held by an Indian tribe or individual subject to restriction by the United States against alienation.
#### § 1000.1 Purpose.

This part describes the organization of the Board, and the assignment of authorities and the responsibilities of the Board, individual Board members, and employees.
#### James Dunlap *v.*James B. Turner.

Plea rtr *abatement—sending process to foreign county.*In an action of assumpsit Drought in the circuit court of Gallatin county, the defendant filed a plea in abatement of the writ, that he was a resident of the county of Morgan and had not been found or served with process in the county of Gallatin, and “ that the said debts, contracts or causes of action mentioned in the plaintiff’s declaration did not accrue in the county of Gallatin, nor were they made payable in said county”: *Held,*that a reasonable construction of the language of the plea was, that all the said debts, contracts or causes of action did not accrue nor were made payable in the county of Gallatin, and that, the declaration purporting to embrace several causes of action, the plea was defective in not averring that no one of the said debts, contracts or causes of action accrued or was made payable in the county of Gallatin.

Appeal from the Circuit'Court of Gallatin county; the Hon. Andrew D. Duff, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Bowman & Wasson, and Mr. T. B. Tanner, for the appellant.

Mr. Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of assumpsit, brought in the circuit court of Gallatin county. The declaration contained two special and the common counts. The defendant filed a plea in abatement of the writ, that he was a resident of the county of Morgan, and had not been found nor served with process in the county of Gallatin, and “that the said debts, contracts or causes of action mentioned in the plaintiff’s declaration did not accrue in the county of Gallatin, nor were they made payable in said county.”

A demurrer to the plea was sustained.

The defendant appeals, and assigns for error the sustaining of the demurrer to the plea.

The declaration purported to embrace several causes of action; The reasonable construction of this language of such a *48plea is, that all the said debts, contracts or causes^of action did not accrue nor were made payable in the county of Gallatin. This might have been, and yet some one of them might have accrued or been made payable in Gallatin county, in which event the court would have had jurisdiction.

The defendant must, by his plea, show that the court had no jurisdiction in aiiy event.

The plea was defective, in not averring that no one of the said debts, contracts or causes of action accrued or was made payable in the county of Gallatin. *Diblee v. Davison,*25 Ill. 486.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
# Instructions

mailto:informationquality@omb.eop.gov.mailto:mschwab@omb.eop.govmailto:james_h_kim@omb.eop.gov

# Section I

# Section II

# Section III

# Section IV
#### §§ 6.131-6.139 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4405]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7349]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Gabriel Metsu, 1629-1667''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Gabriel Metsu, 1629-1667,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National 
Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about April 17, 2011, until 
on or about July 24, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-4405 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Document

Exhibit 10.1

EXTENSION REQUEST PURSUANT TO TRANSITION SERVICES AGREEMENT


August 26, 2021


From: 
Vimeo, Inc.
555 West 18th Street
New York, NY 10011


To:
IAC/InterActiveCorp
555 West 18th Street
New York, NY 10011


Dear Sir or Madam:


Reference is hereby made to the Transition Services Agreement by and between IAC/InterActiveCorp (“IAC”) and Vimeo, Inc. (“Vimeo”) dated as of May 24, 2021 (the “Agreement”). Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 


Pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Agreement, a Recipient may, with at least thirty days’ written notice to the applicable Provider prior to the end of the Term of a Service, request an extension of the Term of such Service, and such request shall be considered in good faith by the applicable Provider. Schedule A to the Agreement provides that IAC shall provide data storage services to Vimeo through September 30, 2021, for a monthly price set forth therein (the “Data Storage Services”). Vimeo hereby requests that IAC extend such Data Storage Services through December 31, 2021 (the “Extended Term”), for the same monthly price through the end of the Extended Term.


If you are in agreement with Vimeo’s request to extend the Data Storage Services through the Extended Term, please sign the below acknowledgement and return it to Vimeo at your earliest convenience.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]













Exhibit 10.1

Sincerely,


Vimeo, Inc.


By: /s/ Michael A. Cheah            
Name: Michael A. Cheah
Title:   General Counsel & Secretary




Acknowledged and Agreed:
IAC/InterActiveCorp


By: /s/ Joanne Hawkins              
Name: Joanne Hawkins
Title:   SVP & Deputy General Counsel
# C_2006224EN.01004801.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/48

---

Action brought on 7 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Burie Onderzoek en Advies B.V.

(Case T-179/06)

(2006/C 224/101)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Weimar, as Agent, assisted by W.A.M. Rupert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Burie Onderzoek en Advies B.V. (Nijeholtpade, Netherlands)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Order the defendant to pay to the Commission the sum of EUR 646 871,28, namely a principal sum of EUR 454 832,62 and EUR 192 039,66 default interest, plus interest at the statutory rate from the date of lodging this application until the date on which the debt has been paid in full; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay to the Commission the sum of EUR 646 871,28, namely a principal sum of EUR 454 832,62 and EUR 192 039,66 default interest, plus interest at the statutory rate from the date of lodging this application until the date on which the debt has been paid in full;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the judicial and extra-judicial proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the judicial and extra-judicial proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Community, represented by the Commission, concluded two contracts with the defendant and other contractors relating to activities carried out in the framework of research and development in the field of advanced communication technologies in Europe (RACE II — project R2022 Barbara) and telematics applications of common interest (Telepromise program).

In accordance with the agreement, the Commission carried out an audit. Following the results of that audit, the Commission sent the defendant a debit note. The Commission submits that it follows from the general conditions of the contracts that the defendant is obliged to repay the difference between the agreed costs and the payments already made by the Commission and that this is a case of an undue payment under Article 203 of Book 6 of the Netherlands Civil Code, which applies to the contracts in question.

---
#### FOUR COUNTY ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORP. v. POWERS

No. 50P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 417

Motion by defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 13 June 1990. Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.