alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006331EN.01002102.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 December 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-198/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/94/EC - New passenger cars - Consumer information on fuel economy and CO2 emissions)

2

(2006/C 331/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to draw up or to transmit to the Commission the report required under Article 9 of Directive 1999/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 relating to the availability of consumer information on fuel economy and CO2 emissions in respect of the marketing of new passenger cars (OJ 2000 L 12, p. 16)

2

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to transmit the report required under Article 9 of Directive 1999/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 relating to the availability of consumer information on fuel economy and CO2 emissions in respect of the marketing of new passenger cars, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to transmit the report required under Article 9 of Directive 1999/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 relating to the availability of consumer information on fuel economy and CO2 emissions in respect of the marketing of new passenger cars, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

2

| 2. | Orders the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

1

---
### [§2361a. Renumbered §4142]
# C_2007082EN.01002702.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/27

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 7 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-79/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/52)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.

1

---
-  Home 
-  Registration 

# In This Section

                      -  Registration Overview 
                      -  Registration Information 
                      -  Registration Online 
                      -  Registration by Mail 
                      -  Registration International 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Company Registration Lookup                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          FY 2021 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2020 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2019 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2018 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2017 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2016 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2014 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2013 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2012 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2011 Registration Program Summary Report                   
                  -                                          FY 2010 Registration Program Summary Report                   

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Registration Statistics

**Registration Program Summary by Year**

The following summary is being provided for informational purposes only. The totals represented below change on a daily basis as a result of persons registering for previous years in addition to the current year.

Some of the information found on this Web site has been provided by external sources. We are not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information provided by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the appropriate source.

**Click here for Registration Data Starting 2008 Report Generator**
### SUBCHAPTER IV—STATE BANK CIRCULATION
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 7 ,

2024

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00921

- CV

TARA CAMERON AND JEREMY CAMERON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS

NEXT FRIEND OF G.C., A MINOR , Appellant s

V. STRIKER INFUSION SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 23

- DCV

- 302654

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed on November 14, 2023. On November 20, 2023, appellants filed in the trial court a motion to vacate the judgment. On December 6, 2023, appellants filed their notice of appeal. On February 22, 2024, this court sent a notice of dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a response showing meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal. The same day, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to2

Tex. R. App. P. 42. 1(a) . Appellants’ motion states that this appeal is moot because

on November 27, 2023 , the trial court vacated the judgment that was the subject of this appeal.
The mootness doctrine limits courts to deciding cases in which an actual controversy exists. See F.D.I.C. v. Nueces Cnty. , 886 S.W.2d 766, 767 (Tex. 1994)

. An issue becomes moot when (1) it appears that one seeks to obtain a judgment on some controversy, which in reality does not exist or (2) when one seeks a judgment on some matter which, when rendered for any reason, cannot have any practical legal effect on a then

- existing controversy. Alsobrook v. MTGLQ Invs., LP , 657
S.W.3d 327 , 330 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2021), aff'd as modified , 656 S.W.3d 394 (Tex. 2022)

. A case becomes moot if there ceases to be a justiciable controversy between the parties, such as when “the issues presented are no longer ‘live.’” Heckman v. Williamson Cty. , 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012)

. Accordingly, we grant appellants’ motion to dismiss.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Timothy T. Tevens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act oF
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 14, 2002


                                                /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                                -------------------------
                                                Timothy T. Tevens,
                                                Chief Executive Officer
# C_2007035EN.01000301.xml

| 17.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 February 2007

(2007/C 35/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3119 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4552 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67310 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2701 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6212 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,16 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0445 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5792 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,249 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6969 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9070 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3755 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,276 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8210 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6705 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5259 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2506 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8854 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0102 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 228,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4340 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1575 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3545 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 872,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5825 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,938 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4330 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,817 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3119

JPY

Japanese yen

156,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4552

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67310

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2701

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6212

ISK

Iceland króna

88,16

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0445

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5792

CZK

Czech koruna

28,249

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6969

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9070

RON

Romanian leu

3,3755

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,276

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8210

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6705

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5259

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2506

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8854

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0102

KRW

South Korean won

1 228,53

ZAR

South African rand

9,4340

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1575

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3545

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 872,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5825

PHP

Philippine peso

62,938

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4330

THB

Thai baht

43,817

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:



|/s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
### §1772f. Open data publication

All public data assets published by the Administration under this subchapter shall be—

(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44);

(2) freely available for download;

(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.

(June 26, 1934, ch. 750, title I, §133, as added Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LVIII, §5872, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3436.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction Regarding No New Disclosure Requirements

Enactment of section not to be construed to require certain additional information to be collected or disclosed, see section 5874 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 1772e of this title.
# C_2007107EN.01000501.xml

| 11.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 May 2007

(2007/C 107/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3535 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 162,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4525 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67985 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1935 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6486 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,75 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1340 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5828 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,236 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,36 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6968 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7609 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2885 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,579 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8131 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6331 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4984 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5829 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8381 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0524 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 250,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3808 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4132 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 931,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6060 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,980 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,9250 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,228 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3535

JPY

Japanese yen

162,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4525

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67985

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1935

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6486

ISK

Iceland króna

86,75

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1340

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5828

CZK

Czech koruna

28,236

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,36

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6968

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7609

RON

Romanian leu

3,2885

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,579

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8131

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6331

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4984

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5829

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8381

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0524

KRW

South Korean won

1 250,02

ZAR

South African rand

9,3808

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4132

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 931,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6060

PHP

Philippine peso

63,980

RUB

Russian rouble

34,9250

THB

Thai baht

44,228

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2007096EN.01001601.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 April 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-72/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/9/EC - Asylum policy - Asylum seekers - Reception - Minimum standards - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2007/C 96/26)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and C. O'Reilly, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: N. Dafniou, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers (OJ 2003 L 31, p. 18)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 26 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 26 of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 74 of 25.3.2006.

1

---
-  Home 
-  105 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 105.40

## Section §105.40: Designated agents for non-residents

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 105.40 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
# C_2006261EN.01003102.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/31

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — Micronas v OHIM (3D-Panorama)

(Case T-45/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 261/64)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.46 What requirements are imposed upon the Secretary for financial management by these standards?

The Secretary shall establish procedures, consistent with Treasury regulations as modified by the Act, for the transfer of funds from the United States to the Indian tribe or tribal organization in strict compliance with the self-determination contract and the annual funding agreement.
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, Marcelo Gustavo Canestri, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of BBVA Banco Francés S.A.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Reserved]; 

 

c) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 27, 2005