alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 411

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 2000

Mr. FROST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 is hereby, elected to the following standing Committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON BANKING: Ms. Lee of California to

5 rank immediately after Mr. Meeks of New York.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the amended Annual Report of LinnCo, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kolja Rockov, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  November 5, 2013/s/  Kolja RockovKolja RockovExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERREGARDING FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDINGSEPTEMBER 30, 2002

I, Nello Gonfiantini III , Chairman of the Board, President and Secretary
of Specialty Trust, Inc. (the Company), hereby state, certify and attest in
this written statement that :

(a)  The quarterly report of the Company filed on form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                                                                                                       |  |                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|/s/ Nello Gonfiantini III

Name: Nello Gonfiantini IIITitle: Chairman of the Board, President
           and Secretary |  | Dated this 19th day of November 2002
1 The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations from the Honorable Henry L. Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-4074

___________ Rickey C. Brooks, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 16, 2000 Filed: July 18, 2000

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BEAM, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rickey C. Brooks petitioned for a writ a habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court 1 found Brooks' petition was untimely filed, rejecting Brooks' contention that his federal statute of limitations was tolled during the pendency of his-2-

state post-conviction proceeding because the late filing of his state action was excused by an ice storm that closed the state court house on the last day he could file it. After carefully reviewing the record and the relevant law, we agree the petition was untimely and affirm the well-reasoned decision of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2 to 2008 10-Q

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of Convergys Corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2008 (the Report), I, Earl C. Shanks, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Earl C. Shanks     
|Earl C. Shanks         
|Chief Financial Officer

May 7, 2008

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Convergys Corporation and will be retained by Convergys Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed
as part of the Form 10-Q.
### Partial Invalidity; Amendments and Repeals
-  Home 

# Memo to Active Grantees of Designated Special Permits

Cover_Letter.pdf (30.01 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
§ 700.335 Grouping and granting of applications for life estate leases. Upon receipt of applications filed pursuant to this section, the Commission shall group and award life estate leases in the following manner: ( a ) Applicants who are determined to be at least 50% (fifty percent) disabled as certified by a physician approved by the Commission. Such applicants shall be ranked in the order of the severity of their disability.
( b ) Applicants who are not at least 50% (fifty percent) disabled shall be ranked in order of their age with the oldest listed first and the youngest listed last; provided that, if any applicant physically resides in Quarter Quad Numbers 78 NW, 77NE, 55SW, or 54 SE, as designated on the Quarter Quad Maps of the Former Joint Use Area prepared by the Bureau of Indian Affairs Field Administrative Office, such applicant shall be given priority over another applicant of equal age.
( c ) Applicants who did not, as of December 22, 1974, and continuously thereafter, maintain a separate place of abode and actually remain domiciled on Hopi Partitioned Lands, and who, but for this subsection would be required to relocate, shall be rejected by the Commission.
( d ) Applicants who were not at least forty-nine (49) years of age on December 22, 1974, *or* are not at least 50% (fifty percent) disabled shall also be rejected by the Commission.
( e ) The Commission shall award life estate leases to not more than one hundred and twenty (120) Navajo applicants with first priority being given to applicants listed pursuant to § 700.335(a) and the next priority being given to applicants listed pursuant to § 700.335(b), in order of such listing.
( f ) The Commission shall award life estate leases to not more than ten (10) Hopi applicants with first priority being given to applicants listed pursuant to § 700.335(a) and the next priority being given to applicants listed pursuant to § 700.335(b) in order of such listing except that the portion of § 700.335(b) concerning residency in Quarter Quad Numbers 78 NW, 77NE, 77NW, 55 SW, 54SE, etc., shall not apply to Hopi applicants.
### §7652. Rifles and ammunition for target practice: educational institutions having corps of cadets

(a) The Secretary of the Army may lend, without expense to the United States, magazine rifles and appendages that are not of the existing service models in use at the time and that are not necessary for a proper reserve supply, to any educational institution having a uniformed corps of cadets of sufficient number for target practice. He may also issue 40 rounds of ball cartridges for each cadet for each range at which target practice is held, but not more than 120 rounds each year for each cadet participating in target practice.

(b) The institutions to which property is lent under subsection (a) shall use it for target practice, take proper care of it and return it when required.

(c) The Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section, containing such other requirements as he considers necessary to safeguard the interests of the United States.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 260, §4652; renumbered §7652, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4652(a)4652(b)  4652(c) | 10:1185 (1st par.).10:1185 (last par., less 1st 22, and last 19, words).10:1185 (1st 22, and last 19, words of last par.). | Apr. 27, 1914, ch. 72 (last proviso and last par. under "Manufacture of Arms"), 38 Stat. 370. |

4652(b)

4652(c)

10:1185 (last par., less 1st 22, and last 19, words).

10:1185 (1st 22, and last 19, words of last par.).

In subsection (a), the words "and carrying on military training" and "the maintenance of" are omitted as surplusage. In clause (2), the words "suitable to said arm" are omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (b), the words "shall use it for target practice" are substituted for the words "insuring the designed use of the property issued". The words "take proper care of it" are substituted for the words "providing against loss to the United States through lack of proper care".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 7651 and 7652 were renumbered sections 8851 and 8852 of this title, respectively.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4652 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 158.650 Holidays.

In alignment with salary administration under § 158.622 and work scheduling under § 158.705, the Department provides holidays to a DHS-CS employee under this section and in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 6103-6104 and 5 CFR part 610, subpart B.
# C_2007042EN.01001803.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/18

---

Action brought on 22 December 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-529/06)

(2007/C 42/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Montaguti, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information, or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information, or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into domestic law expired on 1 July 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 345, p. 90.

1

---
#### § 515.11 Penalties.

Any person who makes a false statement in connection with any request for access to a record, or an amendment thereto, under this part, is subject to the penalties prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 494 and 495.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.1 Authority.

These regulations are prepared, issued, and maintained jointly by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of the Interior, with the active participation and representation of Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and individual tribal members pursuant to the guidance of the Negotiated Rulemaking procedures required by section 107 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act.
#### § 84.005 Will the Secretary approve contracts or agreements even where such approval is not required under this part?

No, the Secretary will not approve contracts or agreements that do not encumber tribal lands for a period of seven or more years. Within thirty days after receipt of final, executed documents, the Secretary will return such contracts and agreements with a statement explaining why Secretarial approval is not required. The provisions of the Act will not apply to those contracts or agreements the Secretary determines are not covered by the Act.
§ 115.161 Staff reporting duties. ( a ) The agency shall require all staff to report immediately and according to agency policy any knowledge, suspicion, or information regarding an incident of sexual abuse that occurred to any detainee; retaliation against detainees or staff who reported or participated in an investigation about such an incident; and any staff neglect or violation of responsibilities that may have contributed to an incident or retaliation. Agency policy shall include methods by which staff can report misconduct outside of their chain of command.
( b ) Staff members who become aware of alleged sexual abuse shall immediately follow the reporting requirements set forth in the agency's written policies and procedures.
( c ) Apart from such reporting, the agency and staff shall not reveal any information related to a sexual abuse report to anyone other than to the extent necessary to help protect the safety of the victim or prevent further victimization of other detainees or staff in the facility, or to make medical treatment, investigation, law enforcement, or other security and management decisions.
( d ) If the alleged victim is under the age of 18 or considered a vulnerable adult under a State or local vulnerable persons statute, the agency shall report the allegation to the designated State or local services agency under applicable mandatory reporting laws.
§ 158.523 Appointment types and circumstances. ( a ) *Renewable appointment.* Appointment of an individual to a renewable appointment is for up to three years. The Department may renew a renewable appointment for any time period of up to three years, subject to any limitation in CTMS policy regarding the number of renewals. Subject to any additional limitation in CTMS policy, the Department may change an unexpired renewable appointment to a continuing appointment for a DHS-CS employee receiving a salary in the standard range described in § 158.613(b). The following types of renewable appointments include special conditions: ( 1 ) *Reemployed annuitant.* Under this part, the Department may appoint an annuitant to a qualified position and must appoint the annuitant to a renewable appointment. An annuitant appointed to a qualified position serves at the will of the Secretary.
( 2 ) *Uncompensated service.* Under this part, the Department may appoint to a qualified position an individual to provide uncompensated service, any such service is gratuitous service, and the Department must appoint such an individual to a renewable appointment. The gratuitous nature of service must be a condition of employment of such an appointment. The Secretary or designee must approve the appointment of each individual providing uncompensated service by name, and such individual if not providing gratuitous service would otherwise be eligible to receive a salary under this part at or above the amount described in § 158.614(a)(2). An individual providing uncompensated service serves at the will of the Secretary. An individual for appointment to a qualified position to provide uncompensated service need not be assessed under this part, and the documentation associated with that individual's qualified position need not include all the information listed in § 158.706(c).
( b ) *Continuing appointment.* Appointment of an individual to a continuing appointment is for an indefinite time period.
( c ) *Advisory appointment.* Appointment of an individual, including a former DHS-CS employee, to an advisory appointment is governed by subpart J of this part.
( d ) *Former DHS-CS employee.* Appointment under this part of a former DHS-CS employee is governed by § 158.525.
( e ) *Restoration to duty from uniformed service or compensable injury.* In accordance with 5 CFR part 353, the Department restores to duty a DHS-CS employee who is a covered person described in 5 CFR 353.103.
( f ) *Current and former political appointees.* Appointment under this part of a current political appointee and a former political appointee, both as defined by OPM, may be subject to additional requirements outside of this part, including coordination with OPM.
# C_2006178EN.01003502.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/35

---

Action brought on 17 May 2006 — Castellani v OHIM — Markant Handels und Service (CASTELLANI)

(Case T-149/06)

(2006/C 178/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Castellani SpA (Pontedera, Italy) (represented by: A. Di Maso, M. R. Di Maso, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Markant Handels und Service GmbH (Offemburg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 February 2006 in Case R 449/2005-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 February 2006 in Case R 449/2005-1;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘CASTELLANI’ for goods in class 33 (alcoholic beverages except beer, liqueur, sparkling wine and Champagne) — application No 2 387 272

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: MARKANT Handels- und Service GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The national word marks ‘CASTELLUM’ for goods in class 33 (wines, with the exception of sparkling wine) and ‘CASTELLUCA’ for goods in class 33 (wines)

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division's decision and rejection of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the conflicting marks are different and the applicant's mark can not cause confusion for German consumers.

Pleas in law:

---
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-169 

November 28, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(2) Plans Covered. Government Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in reference to the request of * * * regarding the coverage under Title IV of the Employee Retirement

Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) of the participation of the * * *) and the * * * of the * * * in the * * * (the Plan).

As we interpret the Plan document * * *, the Plan is maintained by the * * *, the * * *, * * * Associations and

similiar institutions, all employer contributions are commingled, and all amounts payable by the Plan are a general charge

upon all assets of the Plan. 

You inquired whether the participation of the * * * and * * * constitutes a governmental plan under Section

4021(b)(2) of the Act and whether, upon termination of the Plan, Section 4044 of the Act applies to * * * and * * *

participation. 

It appears that there is no question that the participation of the other employers is not excluded from Title IV

coverage. 

Regardless of whether the * * * and * * * are government instrumentalities within the meaning of * * * Section

4021(b)(2) of the Act, their participation in a plan maintained by more than one employer, some of which are not

governmental entities, precludes the application of the governmental [*2] plan exclusion under Section 4021(b)(2) of

the Act. If the Plan terminates, Section 4044 would apply to the entire Plan. 

 Accordingly, premiums are due for the participants of the Plan employed by the * * * and * * *, as well as the

participating employees of the other employers maintaining the Plan, assuming that the Plan is not otherwise excluded

from Title IV coverage. 

We hope this is of assistance and will be happy to discuss any questions that you may have. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 37.5 Validity periods and deadlines for REAL ID driver's licenses and identification cards. ( a ) Driver's licenses and identification cards issued under this part, that are not temporary or limited-term driver's licenses and identification cards, are valid for a period not to exceed eight years. A card may be valid for a shorter period based on other State or Federal requirements.
( b ) On or after May 7, 2025, Federal agencies shall not accept a driver's license or identification card for official purposes from any individual unless such license or card is a REAL ID-compliant driver's license or identification card issued by a State that has been determined by DHS to be in full compliance as defined under this subpart.
( c ) Through the end of May 6, 2025, Federal agencies may accept for official purposes a driver's license or identification card issued under § 37.71. On or after May 7, 2025, Federal agencies shall not accept for official purposes a driver's license or identification card issued under § 37.71.
[73 FR 5331, Jan. 29, 2008, as amended at 79 FR 77838, Dec. 29, 2014; 84 FR 55019, Oct. 15, 2019; 85 FR 23208, Apr. 27, 2020; 86 FR 23240, May 3, 2021; 88 FR 14476, Mar. 9, 2023]