T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D EN N I S G RI M ES, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J AME S E . T I L T ON , D e f

e n d a n t, a nd A . F A V I L A ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l an t s. N o. 09- 55578 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 6 - c v - 0 2 3 0 9 - B T MLSP ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia B a rryT . M os kow i t z , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** 

# FI LED JU N 17 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 55578 2 B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D e f e nda ntpr i s on of

f i c i a l s appe a l f

r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng th e m q u a l i f

i e di mmu n i tyi n Ca l i f

o rn i as t a t e p r i s o n e rD e n n i s G r i me s ’ s 4 2 U . S. C. § 1 98 3 act i on . W e have j uri sdi ct i on ov eran i nt er l ocut ory app ea l fr om the deni al o f q u a lif ie dim m u n ity . C lem ent v. G om ez , 2 9 8 F .3 d8 9 8 , 9 0 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , So rr el

s v . McKee , 2 9 0 F . 3 d9 6 5 , 9 6 9 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 2 ) , a n dwe a f f irm in p a rt, v a c a te in p a rt, an dr e m a n d . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyc o n c lu d e dth a t d e f e n d a n ts w e r e n o t e n title dto qua l i f i e d i m m uni tyon G r i m e s ’ s c l a i m unde rthe R e l i gi ous L a nd U s e a nd I n s t i tu t i o n a l i z e dPe r s o n s A c t( “ RLU I PA ” ) b e c au s e G r i me s ’ s r i g h t s u n d e rRLU I PA w e r e c le a r lye s tab lis h e din la te 2 0 0 5 a n d2 0 0 6 w h e n d e f e n d a n ts d e n ie dh is r e q u e s ts f o rav e g e tar ia n d ie t b a s e do n h is r e lig io u s b e lie f s . Se e C ut te rv . W

i lki ns on , 544 U . S . 70 9, 72 5 n . 13 (200 5) (R L U IP A bars i nq ui ryi nt o w hether apart i cul arbel i ef o rp r a c tic e is “c e n tr a l” to ap r is o n e r ’s r e lig io n ) ; see a l so W a rso ld i er v. W

o o d f o rd , 4 1 8 F .3 d9 8 9 , 9 9 5 , 1 0 0 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ( R L U I P A is to b e c o n s tru e db r o a d lyin favo r of prot ec t i ng an i nm at e’ s r i gh tt o exerci se hi s r el i gi ou s bel i ef s and “ [w ] here a p ri so n er ch al l en g es th e [p ri so n ’ s] j u st i fi cat i o n s, p ri so n o ffi ci al s m u st s e t f o rth de t a i l e d e vi de nc e , t a i l or e d t o the s i tua t i on be f or e the c ourt , tha ti de nt i f i e s the09- 55578 3 fa i l i ng s i n the al t ernat i ves a dv ance d b y the pri soner. ”) (c i t at i on and i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed). D e f e n d a n ts c o rr e c tlyc o n te n dth a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e db yr e f u s in g to co n si d er th ei r arg u m en t s p ert ai n i n g t o q u al i fi edi m m u n i ty o n G ri m es’ s F i rst A m en d m en tcl ai m . H o w ev er, w e d ecl i n e t o co n si d er th ei r arg u m en t s i n th e fi rst in s ta n c e , a n dv a c a te a n dr e m a n dto th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f o rc o n s id e r a tio n o f

th is is s u e . See R ic h a rd

s o n v . R u n n e ls , 59 4 F . 3d 66 6, 67 2 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( decl i ni ng t o rea ch qu al i fi ed i m m un i ty bec ause the i ss ue had n everbeen address ed by the di stri ct court ). D ef

endant s’ re m ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. W e h a v e c o n s id e r e dD e f e n d a n ts ’ A p r il 1 6 , 2 0 1 0 le tte r , a n dd e c lin e to re vers e and re m and i n l i gh tof H o l ley v. Ca l i

f o rn i a D ep ’t

o f C o rrs. , 599 F . 3d 1108 ( 9th C i r . 2010) , be c aus e the di s tr i c tc ourti n i t s S e pt e m be r5, 2007 or de r , a l r e a dy d is m is s e dG r im e s ’s R L U I P A c la im s f o rm o n e taryd a m a g e s a g a in s t D e f e n d a n ts in th e iro f f ic ia l c ap a c itie s . D e f e n d a n ts s h a ll b e a ra ll c o s ts o n ap p e a l. AF F I RME D i n p a r t , V AC AT E D i n p a r t , a n d RE MAND E D.