12024 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 2011 / Notices 

necessary to avoid evasion of the denial 

order against Tsu. 

As provided in Section 766.23 of the 

Regulations, I gave notice to Cheerway 

that its export privileges under the 

Regulations could be denied for up to 10 

years due to its relationship with Tsu 

and that BIS believes naming it as a 

person related to Tsu would be 

necessary to prevent evasion of a denial 

order imposed against Tsu. In providing 

such notice, I gave Cheerway an 

opportunity to oppose its addition to the 

Tsu Denial Order as a related party. 

Having received no submission, I have 

decided, following consultations with 

BIS’s Office of Export Enforcement, 

including its Director, to name 

Cheerway as a Related Person to the Tsu 

Denial Order, thereby denying its export 

privileges for 10 years from the date of 

Tsu’s conviction. 

I have also decided to revoke all 

licenses issued pursuant to the Act or 

Regulations in which the Related Person 

had an interest at the time of Tsu’s 

conviction. The 10-year denial period 

will end on August 3, 2019. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

I. Until August 3, 2019, William ChiWai Tsu with last known addresses at: 

Register Number 34009–112, USP 

Florence ADMAX, U.S. Penitentiary, 

P.O. Box 8500, Florence, CO 81226 and 

1432 Forest Glen Drive, Unit #65, 

Hacienda Heights, CA 91745, and when 

acting for or on behalf of Tsu, his 

representatives, assigns, agents or 

employees (collectively referred to 

hereinafter as the ‘‘Denied Person’’), and 

the following person related to the 

Denied Person as defined by Section 

766.23 of the Regulations: Cheerway 

Corporation, with last known addresses 

at: 1641 W. Main Street, Suite 308, 

Alhambra, CA 91801, and 1432 Forest 

Glenn Drive, Unit #65, Hacienda 

Heights, CA 91745, and when acting for 

or on behalf of Cheerway, its successors 

or assigns, agents, or employees (‘‘the 

Related Person’’) (together, the Denied 

Person and the Related Person are 

‘‘Persons Subject to this Order’’), may 

not, directly or indirectly, participate in 

any way in any transaction involving 

any commodity, software or technology 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from 

the United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

subject to the Regulations, including but 

not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

II. No person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Persons Subject to this Order any 

item subject to the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Persons Subject to this Order of the 

ownership, possession, or control of any 

item subject to the Regulations that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States, including financing or 

other support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Persons Subject 

to this Order acquire or attempt to 

acquire such ownership, possession or 

control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Persons Subject to 

this Order of any item subject to the 

Regulations that has been exported from 

the United States; 

D. Obtain from the Persons Subject to 

this Order in the United States any item 

subject to the Regulations with 

knowledge or reason to know that the 

item will be, or is intended to be, 

exported from the United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Persons 

Subject to this Order, or service any 

item, of whatever origin, that is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Persons 

Subject to this Order if such service 

involves the use of any item subject to 

the Regulations that has been or will be 

exported from the United States. For 

purposes of this paragraph, servicing 

means installation, maintenance, repair, 

modification or testing. 

III. In addition to the Related Person 

named above, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the Regulations, any 

other person, firm, corporation, or 

business organization related to the 

Denied Person by affiliation, ownership, 

control, or position of responsibility in 

the conduct of trade or related services 

may also be made subject to the 

provisions of this Order if necessary to 

prevent evasion of the Order. 

IV. This Order does not prohibit any 

export, reexport, or other transaction 

subject to the Regulations where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin 

technology. 

V. This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect until August 

3, 2019. 

VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the 

Regulations, Tsu may file an appeal of 

this Order with the Under Secretary of 

Commerce for Industry and Security. 

The appeal must be filed within 45 days 

from the date of this Order and must 

comply with the provisions of Part 756 

of the Regulations. 

VII. In accordance with Part 756 of the 

Regulations, the Related Person may 

also file an appeal of this Order with the 

Under Secretary of Commerce for 

Industry and Security. The appeal must 

be filed within 45 days from the date of 

this Order and must comply with the 

provisions of Part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

VIII. A copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to the Denied Person and the 

Related Person. This Order shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Issued this 7th day of February, 2011. 

Bernard Kritzer, 

Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4819 Filed 3–3–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–868] 

Folding Metal Tables and Chairs From 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 2009–2010 

Antidumping Duty Administrative and 

New Shipper Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 4, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit 

Astvatsatrian or Charles Riggle, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–6412 or (202) 482– 

0650, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 28 and 29, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 43 / Friday, March 4, 2011 / Notices 12025 

1This figure does not include the company for 

which the Department is rescinding the 

administrative review. 

Department’’) published the initiations 

of the 2009–2010 administrative review 

and the new shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of 

Xinjiamei Furniture Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Xinjiamei’’), respectively, of the 

antidumping duty order on folding 

metal tables and chairs from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocations in 

Part, 75 FR 44224 (July 28, 2010) and 

Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of New Shipper Review, 75 FR 

44767 (July 29, 2010). These reviews 

cover the period June 1, 2009, through 

May 31, 2010. The preliminary results 

of the administrative review are 

currently due no later than March 2, 

2011. 

On February 9, 2011, Xinjiamei 

agreed to waive the new shipper review 

time limits and agreed to the alignment 

of its NSR with the 2009–2010 

administrative review. See Letter from 

Xinjiamei, regarding Waiver of the Time 

Limits and Request for Alignment, dated 

February 9, 2011. Therefore, pursuant to 

section 351.214(j)(3) of the Department’s 

regulations, we have aligned the NSR of 

Xinjiamei with the 2009–2010 

administrative review. Accordingly, the 

preliminary results for the NSR are also 

due on March 2, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. The Act further provides, 

however, that the Department may 

extend that 245-day period to 365 days 

if it determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of the administrative review and 

new shipper review of folding metal 

tables and chairs from the PRC within 

this time limit. Specifically, additional 

time is needed to determine the 

appropriate surrogate country, and 

surrogate values with which to value 

factors of production. Moreover, 

additional time is needed in order that 

the Department can conduct mandatory 

verifications and issue verification 

reports prior to the preliminary results. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is extending the time period for 

completion of the preliminary results of 

these reviews, which are currently due 

on March 2, 2011, by 90 days. 

Therefore, the preliminary results for 

the administrative and new shipper 

reviews are now due no later than May 

31, 2011. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: February 25, 2011. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4940 Filed 3–3–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–840] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From India: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Partial Rescission of Review, 

and Preliminary No Shipment 

Determination 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from 

India with respect to 202 companies.1

The respondents which the Department 

selected for individual examination are 

Apex Exports (Apex) and Falcon Marine 

Exports Limited (Falcon). The 

respondents which were not selected for 

individual examination are listed in the 

‘‘Preliminary Results of the Review’’ 

section of this notice. This is the fifth 

administrative review of this order. The 

period of review (POR) is February 1, 

2009, through January 31, 2010. 

We preliminarily determine that sales 

made by Apex and Falcon have been 

made at below normal value (NV), and, 

therefore, are subject to antidumping 

duties. In addition, based on the 

preliminary results for the respondents 

selected for individual examination, we 

have preliminarily determined a margin 

for those companies that were not 

individually examined. Finally, we are 

rescinding this review with respect to 

Devi Sea Foods Limited (Devi) because 

the order with respect to shrimp 

produced and exported by this company 

was revoked effective February 1, 2009. 

If the preliminary results are adopted 

in our final results of administrative 

review, we will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. Interested parties are invited to 

comment on the preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 4, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Henry Almond or Elizabeth Eastwood, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0049, or (202) 

482–3874, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In February 2005, the Department 

published in the Federal Register an 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from India. 

See Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value and Antidumping Duty 

Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from India, 70 FR 5147 (Feb. 1, 

2005) (Shrimp Order). On February 1, 

2010, the Department published in the 

Federal Register a notice of opportunity 

to request an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order of certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from India for 

the period February 1, 2009, through 

January 31, 2010. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 75 

FR 5037 (Feb. 1, 2010). In response to 

timely requests from interested parties 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1) and 

(2) to conduct an administrative review 

of the U.S. sales of shrimp by numerous 

Indian producers/exporters, the 

Department published a notice of 

initiation of administrative review for 

203 companies. See Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, India, 

and Thailand: Notice of Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 75 FR 17693 (Apr. 7, 2010) 

(Initiation Notice). 

In the Initiation Notice, the 

Department indicated that, in the event 

that we would limit the respondents 

selected for individual examination in 

accordance with section 777A(c)(2) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act), we would select mandatory 

respondents for individual examination 

based upon CBP entry data. See 

Initiation Notice, 75 FR at 17699. In 

April 2010, we received comments on 

the issue of respondent selection from 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES