alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,643
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,374
<INVENTORY>                                      1,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,636
<PP&E>                                          17,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (440)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,758
<BONDS>                                         74,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,784
<SALES>                                         56,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,625
<CGS>                                           11,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,331
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
# C_2006212EN.01002002.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht, lodged on 26 June 2006 — Manfred Otten v Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen

(Case C-278/06)

(2006/C 212/35)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Manfred Otten

Applicant:

Defendant: Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen

Defendant:

Question(s) referred

Is Article 7(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 of 28 December 1992 (1), as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1256/1999 of 17 May 1999 (2), to be interpreted as meaning that on expiry of rural leases on a milk-production holding or a milk-production area the attached reference quantities can revert to the lessor even if that lessor is not, or is not about to become, a producer himself, insofar as he transfers the reference quantity as soon as possible through a State sales office to a third party who has that status?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 405, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 1999 L 160, p. 73.

2

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Kathy A. San Roman, Vice President, Human Resources & Administration and Acting Chief FinancialOfficer of Solexa, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Solexa, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005
  /s/ Kathy A. San Roman
### §2219e. Liability for making criminal referrals

#### (a) In general

Any institution of the Farm Credit System, or any director, officer, employee, or agent of a Farm Credit System institution, that discloses to a Government authority information proffered in good faith that may be relevant to a possible violation of any law or regulation shall not be liable to any person under any law of the United States or any State—

(1) for the disclosure; or

(2) for any failure to notify the person involved in the possible violation.

#### (b) No prohibition on disclosure

Any institution of the Farm Credit System, or any director, officer, employee, or agent of a Farm Credit System institution, may disclose information to a Government authority that may be relevant to a possible violation of any law or regulation.

(Pub. L. 104–105, title II, §221, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 184.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Farm Credit System Reform Act of 1996, and not as part of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 which comprises this chapter.
### e*ld#rft$zh6faz2jLj&i*i 

## ir ^fMjdMAtrr 3e>9?Smre//wu?3 

# tfetf&iZforfp&Hs ZS57Q F^FAPPEALS 12th Court cf Appeals District
fl£: && A/uyrfhzt! /Z-/S-OOQ 65-Oz 'Tkml dajrC^gMam^brnJ 2#/~AM>7~rf 

### 0 Ufe Smre aP7g<as D&kz.&&utL£>f:7#£ /Z X/z&zjxrLouer. 7 ^TJ5 £h&Z30(zZ7xz>!*f 0? 

### „^^J^JZ^^^/^^2^^^^^^?' 

## (£**r. ^AT^AAMtfp&<se*sr~id?£ &&Ad&jT-'firf*. ~7£&t- -^6eejfa^^i/g/ksj^^ 

## /%j^T&//yJ5i/J)/7n:rt£df 

## £/fy//>A/d0&Af?& M/rj/r&ns8JA3*mq< 33fti

MR3JD .23T83 MAq



### •
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40372

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EZEQUIEL GUANERJES LOPEZ-DELEON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-02-CR-784-1

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Ezequiel Guanerjes Lopez-DeLeon appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Lopez-DeLeon complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He

argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. LopezDeLeon thus contends that his sentence should not exceed the

maximum terms of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 
No. 03-40372

-2-

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Lopez-DeLeon acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.119 To what extent shall the Secretary consult with affected Indian tribes before spending funds for any construction project?

Before spending any funds for a planning, design, construction, or renovation project, whether subject to a competitive application and ranking process or not, the Secretary shall consult with any Indian tribe or tribal organization(s) that would be significantly affected by the expenditure to determine and to follow tribal preferences to the greatest extent feasible concerning: size, location, type, and other characteristics of the project.
#### § 9.33 Enforcement.

The head of each agency shall take such actions as are necessary to ensure that the provisions herein are vigorously implemented and enforced in that agency.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-3 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby
certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 16, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables
LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-3 and U.S. Bank National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period
that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2013By:

/s/ Mark McCastlainName:

Mark McCastlainTitle:

Senior Vice President and TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2013
### §261. Creation; membership; compensation; meetings; officers; procedure; quorum; vacancies

There is created a Federal Advisory Council, which shall consist of as many members as there are Federal reserve districts. Each Federal reserve bank by its board of directors shall annually select from its own Federal reserve district one member of said council, who shall receive such compensation and allowances as may be fixed by his board of directors subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The meetings of said advisory council shall be held at Washington, District of Columbia, at least four times each year, and oftener if called by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The council may in addition to the meetings above provided for hold such other meetings in Washington, District of Columbia, or elsewhere, as it may deem necessary, may select its own officers and adopt its own methods of procedure, and a majority of its members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Vacancies in the council shall be filled by the respective reserve banks, and members selected to fill vacancies shall serve for the unexpired term.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §12 (par.), 38 Stat. 263; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of first par. of section 12 of act Dec. 23, 1913. Second par. of section 12 is classified to section 262 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
### §2404. Powers of Commission

#### (a) Hearings; administration of oaths

The Commission may for the purpose of carrying out this chapter hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence, as the Commission may deem advisable. The Commission may administer oaths of 1 affirmations to witnesses appearing before it.

#### (b) Implementation authority of members or agents of Commission

When so authorized by the Commission, any member or agent of the Commission may take any action which the Commission is authorized to take by this section.

#### (c) Request for information from other Federal departments or agencies

The Commission may secure directly from any department or agency of the United States information necessary to enable it to carry out this chapter. Upon request of the Chairperson of the Commission, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.

#### (d) Issuance of subpenas for attendance of witnesses and production of evidence; refusal to obey; contempt proceedings; manner of service of subpenas; service of process

(1) The Commission shall have power to issue subpenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of any evidence that relates to any matter under investigation by the Commission. Such attendance of witnesses and the production of such evidence may be required from any place within the United States at any designated place of hearing within the United States.

(2) If a person issued a subpena under paragraph (1) refuses to obey such subpena or is guilty of contumacy, any court of the United States within the judicial district within which the hearing is conducted or within the judicial district within which such person is found or resides or transacts business may (upon application by the Commission) order such person to appear before the Commission to produce evidence or to give testimony touching the matter under investigation. Any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof.

(3) The subpenas of the Commission shall be served in the manner provided for subpenas issued by a United States district court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States district courts.

(4) All process of any court to which application may be made under this section may be served in the judicial district wherein the person required to be served resides or may be found.

(Pub. L. 93–495, title II, §204, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1509.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–495, which enacted this chapter (§2401 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

1 So in original. Probably should be "or".
§ 276.10 Grant payment requirements. ( a ) Except for construction grants for which the letter-of-credit method is optional, the letter-of-credit funding method shall be used by the Bureau where all of the following conditions exist: ( 1 ) When there is or will be a continuing relationship between a grantee and the Bureau for at least a 12-month period and the total amount of advances to be received within that period from the Bureau is $120,000, or more, as prescribed by Treasury Circular No. 1075.
( 2 ) When the grantee has established or demonstrated to the Bureau the willingness and ability to establish procedures that will minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and their disbursement by the grantee.
( 3 ) When the grantee's financial management system meets the standards for fund control and accountability prescribed in § 276.7.
( b ) The method of advancing funds by Treasury check shall be used, in accordance with the provisions of Treasury Circular No. 1075, when the grantee meets all of the requirements specified in paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section.
( c ) The reimbursement by Treasury check method shall be the preferred method when the grantee does not meet the requirements specified in either paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3), or both. This method may also be used when the major portion of the program is accomplished through private market financing or Federal loans, and when the Bureau grant assistance constitutes a minor portion of the program.
( d ) Unless otherwise required by law, the Bureau shall not withhold payments for proper charges made by grantees at any time during the grant period unless: ( 1 ) A grantee has failed to comply with the program objectives, grant award conditions, or Bureau reporting requirements; or
( 2 ) The grantee is indebted to the United States and collection of the indebtedness will not impair accomplishment of the objectives of any grant program sponsored by the United States. Under such conditions, the Bureau may, upon reasonable notice, inform the grantee that payments will not be made for obligations incurred after a specified date until the conditions are corrected or the indebtedness to the Federal Government is liquidated.
( e ) Appendix B of this part provides the procedures for requesting advances or reimbursements.
[40 FR 51316, Nov. 4, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 5099, Feb. 4, 1976]
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 197

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 358) to amend the Public

Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

1974, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to protect consumers

in managed care plans and other health coverage.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. DINGELL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 358) to amend

the Public Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement

Income Security Act of 1974, and the Internal Revenue

Code of 1986 to protect consumers in managed care

plans and other health coverage.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this

2 resolution the House shall without intervention of any

3 point of order resolve into the Committee of the Whole

4 House on the state of the Union for consideration of the

5 bill (H.R. 358) to amend the Public Health Service Act,

6 the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,

7 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to protect con-
2

•HRES 197 IH

1 sumers in managed care plans and other health coverage.

2 The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Gen3 eral debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not ex4 ceed 120 minutes, with 60 minutes of debate to be equally

5 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi6 nority member of the Committee on Commerce, 30 min7 utes of debate to be equally divided and controlled by the

8 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

9 on Ways and Means and 30 minutes of debate to be equal10 ly divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi11 nority member of the Committee on Education and the

12 Workforce. After general debate the bill shall be consid13 ered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill

14 shall be considered by title rather than by section. Each

15 title shall be considered as read. During consideration of

16 the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee

17 of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

18 basis of whether the member offering an amendment has

19 caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

20 Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 in rule

21 XVIII. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

22 amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the bill

23 to the House with such amendments as may have been

24 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or25 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage
3

•HRES 197 IH

1 without intervening motion, except one motion to recom2 mit with or without instructions.

3 SEC. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and re4 ports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, then

5 on the next legislative day the House shall, immediately

6 after the third daily order of business under clause 1 of

7 rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for fur8 ther consideration of the bill.

Æ