alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102.1 Registration of political committees (52 U.S.C. 30103(a)). ( a ) *Principal campaign committees.* Each principal campaign committee shall file a Statement of Organization in accordance with 11 CFR 102.2 no later than 10 days after designation pursuant to 11 CFR 101.1. In addition, each principal campaign committee shall file all designations, statements and reports which are filed with such committee with the Commission.
( b ) *Authorized committees.* Each authorized committee(s) shall file only one Statement of Organization in accordance with 11 CFR 102.2 no later than 10 days after designation pursuant to 11 CFR 101.1. Such Statement(s) shall be filed with the principal campaign committee of the authorizing candidate.
( c ) *Separate segregated funds.* Each separate segregated fund established under 52 U.S.C. 30118(b)(2)(C) shall file a Statement of Organization with the Federal Election Commission no later than 10 days after establishment. This requirement shall not apply to a fund established solely for the purpose of financing political activity in connection with State or local elections. Examples of establishment events after which a fund would be required to register include, but are not limited to: A vote by the board of directors or comparable governing body of an organization to create a separate segregated fund to be used wholly or in part for federal elections; selection of initial officers to administer such a fund; or payment of the initial operating expenses of such a fund.
( d ) *Other political committees.* All other committees shall file a Statement of Organization no later than 10 days after becoming a political committee within the meaning of 11 CFR 100.5. Such statement(s) shall be filed with the Commission.
[45 FR 15104, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 79 FR 77845, Dec. 29, 2014; 84 FR 18699, May 2, 2019]
### §325. Examinations

As a condition of membership such banks shall likewise be subject to examinations made by direction of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or of the Federal reserve bank by examiners selected or approved by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §9 (par.), as added June 21, 1917, ch. 32, §3, 40 Stat. 233; amended Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the seventh par. of section 9 of act Dec. 23, 1913, as amended. The seventh par. constituted the fifth par. of section 9 in 1917 (40 Stat. 232), became the sixth par. in 1927 (44 Stat. 1229), and became the seventh par. in 1950 (64 Stat. 458). For further details, see Codification note set out under section 321 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
June 25, 2015 

Mr. Gregory Glassman 

15 Massabesic Drive 

Auburn, NH 03032 

Dear Mr. Glassman: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 12, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2249), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 63.14 What positions require a background investigation and determination of suitability for employment or retention?

All positions that allow an applicant, employee, or volunteer regular contact with or control over Indian children are subject to a background investigation and determination of suitability for employment.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-41 

May 13, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(2) Plans Covered. Government Plans 

OPINION: 

 As was indicated to you in a telephone conversation with * * * of the Corporation on April 15, 1975, our review

of the Form PBGC-1 which accompanied your premium submission of April 10, 1975, indicates that the * * * may be

excluded from coverage under Section 4021(b)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. That

section provides for the exemption of a plan "established and maintained for its employees by the government of the

United States, by the government of any state or political subdivision thereof. . . ." 

For the Corporation to determine if the * * * is excluded from coverage, we must have a statement assuring that (1)

all employees covered by the plan are, in fact, public employees, and that (2) the political subdivision * * * is, in fact,

the plan sponsor. If you can confirm these two points in writing, we will refund the premium payment. 

Joseph E. Ellinger 

Director, Office of Program Operations
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-50010 onForm S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-149005 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-150055 on Form S-3 of Exactech, Inc. of our reports dated March 13, 2009, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statementsand financial statement schedule and internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Exactech, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP 

Charlotte, North Carolina 

March 13, 2009
#### § 9036.6 Continuation of certification.

Candidates who have received matching funds and who are eligible to continue to receive such funds may continue to submit additional submissions for payment to the Commission on dates specified in the Federal Election Commission's Guideline for Presentation in Good Order. The last date for first-time submissions will be the first Monday in March of the year following the election. No contribution will be matched if it is submitted after the last submission date, regardless of the date the contribution was deposited.

[56 FR 34134, July 25, 1991]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1033 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1033

To amend title IV of the Social Security Act to coordinate the penalty 
      for the failure of a State to operate a State child support 
 disbursement unit with the alternative penalty procedure for failures 
                 to meet data processing requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1999

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title IV of the Social Security Act to coordinate the penalty 
      for the failure of a State to operate a State child support 
 disbursement unit with the alternative penalty procedure for failures 
                 to meet data processing requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Support Penalty Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ALTERNATIVE PENALTY PROCEDURE FOR FAILURE TO OPERATE STATE 
              DISBURSEMENT UNIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 455(a)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 655(a)(4)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) The Secretary may not disapprove a State plan 
                under section 454 against a State with respect to a 
                failure to comply with section 454(27) for a fiscal 
                year as long as the State is receiving a penalty under 
                this paragraph with respect to a failure to comply with 
                either section 454(24)(A) or 454(24)(B) for the fiscal 
                year.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the amendments made by section 101 of the 
Child Support Performance and Incentive Act of 1998.
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****NTP update**
 
1999
Oct | Nov
2000
Mar | Jul | Nov
2001
Mar | Oct
2002
Mar | Jul | Oct
2003
Jan | May | Jul | Oct
 
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3564/3:
Item Number:0507-P-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000598547
 
October 9, 2018
### Part A—Statewide Plans To Assure Fair Access to Insurance Requirements
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF BRADLEY E. SPARKS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bradley E. Sparks, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 10, 2005



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/    BRADLEY E. SPARKS
|Bradley E. Sparks       
|Chief Financial Officer
-  Home 
-  106 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 106.95

## Section §106.95: Requesting a change to the regulations

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 106.95 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
### APPENDIX E

May 30, 2007 letter to the US EPA Region 9 Administrato r
#### Keith M. Brewer et al. *v.*Zoning Commission of Bristol et al.

*Stephen J. Anderson,*in support of the petition.

*Kevmeth J. LasJca*and *Paul Hanrahan,*in opposition.

Submitted June 3

decided June 11, 1974

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.
#### § 100.10 Person (52 U.S.C. 30101(11)).

*Person* means an individual, partnership, committee, association, corporation, labor organization, and any other organization, or group of persons, but does not include the Federal government or any authority of the Federal government.
#### §§ 100.30-100.32 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.171 Will there be a hearing? Yes. The Deputy Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall appoint an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to hold a hearing. ( a ) The hearing shall be held within 10 days of the date of the notice referred to in § 900.170 unless the Indian tribe or tribal organization agrees to a later date.
( b ) If possible, the hearing will be held at the office of the Indian tribe or tribal organization. If the hearing is held more than 50 miles from the office of the Indian tribe or tribal organization, the Secretary shall arrange to pay transportation costs and per diem for incidental expenses. This will allow for adequate representation of the Indian tribe or tribal organization.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Edward Malley, Jr.

*J. Daniel Sagarin,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Francis M. McDonald,*state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Argued February 5

decided February 5, 1974

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County at Waterbury, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the case be and hereby is dismissed.
### §2503. State entitlement to escheat or custody

Where any sum is payable on a money order, traveler's check, or other similar written instrument (other than a third party bank check) on which a banking or financial organization or a business association is directly liable—

(1) if the books and records of such banking or financial organization or business association show the State in which such money order, traveler's check, or similar written instrument was purchased, that State shall be entitled exclusively to escheat or take custody of the sum payable on such instrument, to the extent of that State's power under its own laws to escheat or take custody of such sum;

(2) if the books and records of such banking or financial organization or business association do not show the State in which such money order, traveler's check, or similar written instrument was purchased, the State in which the banking or financial organization or business association has its principal place of business shall be entitled to escheat or take custody of the sum payable on such money order, traveler's check, or similar written instrument, to the extent of that State's power under its own laws to escheat or take custody of such sum, until another State shall demonstrate by written evidence that it is the State of purchase; or

(3) if the books and records of such banking or financial organizations or business association show the State in which such money order, traveler's check, or similar written instrument was purchased and the laws of the State of purchase do not provide for the escheat or custodial taking of the sum payable on such instrument, the State in which the banking or financial organization or business association has its principal place of business shall be entitled to escheat or take custody of the sum payable on such money order, traveler's check, or similar written instrument, to the extent of that State's power under its own laws to escheat or take custody of such sum, subject to the right of the State of purchase to recover such sum from the State of principal place of business if and when the law of the State of purchase makes provision for escheat or custodial taking of such sum.

(Pub. L. 93–495, title VI, §603, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1525.)
# C_2007069EN.01001103.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/11

---

Action brought on 7 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-58/07)

(2007/C 69/26)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and A. Alcover San Pedro, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provision necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/110/EC (1) of 25 November 2003 on assistance in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air and, in any event, by not communicating them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provision necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/110/EC (1) of 25 November 2003 on assistance in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air and, in any event, by not communicating them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for adapting domestic law to Directive 2003/110/EC expired on 6 December 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 321, p. 26.

1

---
### **CHAPTER 859—PROFESSIONAL MILITARY EDUCATION SCHOOLS**

Sec.
8591.
Degree granting authority for Naval War College.
8592.
Degree granting authority for Marine Corps University.
8593.
Naval War College: acceptance of grants for faculty research for scientific, literary, and educational purposes.
8594.
Marine Corps University: acceptance of grants for faculty research for scientific, literary, and educational purposes.
8595.
United States Naval Community College: establishment and degree granting authority.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, §557(b), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1741, added item 8595.

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(e)(3), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837, 1838, redesignated chapter 609 of this title as this chapter and items 7101 to 7104 as 8591 to 8594, respectively.

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, §543(f)(2), (g)(2), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4462, 4463, added items 7101 and 7102 and struck out former items 7101 "Naval War College: master of arts in national security and strategic studies" and 7102 "Marine Corps University: masters degrees; board of advisors".

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §522(d)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3243, added items 7103 and 7104.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §532(b)(3)(B), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1105, substituted "masters degrees; board of advisors" for "master of military studies" in item 7102.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, §911(a)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2828, added item 7102.
#### §§ 6.171-6.999 [Reserved]