**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-K**

(Mark One)

**x****  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017or**

**o**** ****TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the transition period from _____ to _____Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-171508-03**

**Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity:0001548266**

**GS Mortgage Securities Trust2012-GCJ7**

**(exact name of the issuing entity as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001004158**

**GS Mortgage Securities CorporationII**

**(exact name of the depositor as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541502**

**Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001555524**

**LoanCore Capital Markets LLC**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

**(formerly known asJefferies LoanCore LLC)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541001**

**Citigroup Global Markets RealtyCorp.**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001682511**

**Starwood Mortgage Funding I LLC**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

| **New York****(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization of**

**the issuing entity)** | **38-3880056**

**38-3880057**

**38-3880058**

**38-3880059**

**38-3880060**

**38-3880061**

**38-7047664**

**(I.R.S. Employer**

**Identification Numbers)** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

**c/o Wells Fargo Bank, National Association**

**as Certificate Administrator**

**9062 Old Annapolis Road**

**Columbia, MD**

**(Address of principalexecutive offices of the issuing entity)**

**21045**

**(Zip Code)**

**Registrant’s telephone number,including area code:**

**(212) 902-1000**

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasonedissuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes ⌧ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required tofile reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filedall reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periodthat the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has beensubject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ⌧ Yes oNo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submittedelectronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every InteractiveData File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and postsuch files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuantto Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is notcontained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sknowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated byreference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smallerreporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “largeaccelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large acceleratedfiler        o                                                                                                       Acceleratedfiler                                     o

Non-acceleratedfiler          ⌧  (Do not check ifa smaller reporting company)                          Smaller reporting company                    o

                                                                                                                                                       Emerging growthcompany                    o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if theregistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complyingwith any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant toSection 13(a) of the ExchangeAct.                                            o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). oYes ⌧ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-votingcommon equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price atwhich the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price ofsuch common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s mostrecently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed alldocuments and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securitiesunder a plan confirmed by a court. oYes oNo

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of theregistrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE**

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated byreference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) intowhich the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders;(2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuantto Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documentsshould be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report tosecurity holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

 

 

Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas acts as trustee of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement. Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the trustee isrequired to provide an assessment of compliance with applicable servicingcriteria solely with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB(regarding advances of funds or guarantees regarding collections, cash flows ordistributions, and any interest or other fees charged for such advances, aremade, reviewed and approved as specified in the transaction agreements).However, during the reporting period, the trustee did not perform any servicingfunction with respect to the servicing criteria specified in Item1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB. The master servicer or the special servicer,to the extent required, performed the servicing function identified withrespect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, and each such party includedItem 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in the assessment of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria and accountant’s attestation report for thesubject transaction. As a result, this Annual Report on Form 10-K does notinclude an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria of thetrustee. One or more other servicers of the mortgage loans serviced under thePooling and Servicing Agreement have delivered one or more assessments ofcompliance with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria andaccountants’ attestation reports from CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,Inc. and National Tax Search, LLC. These entities were engaged by themaster servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to remit tax paymentsreceived from the escrow accounts of borrowers to local taxing authorities, toreport tax amounts due, to verify tax parcel information, and to verifynon-escrow tax payments. These servicing functions are included within theservicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) ofRegulation AB. Therefore, under the principles-based definition of“servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB that looks to thefunctions that an entity performs, these vendors are “servicers” for thepurposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. *See* Compliance andDisclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

**PART I**

**Item 1. Business.**

Omitted.

**Item 1A. Risk Factors.**

Omitted.

**Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.**

None.

**Item 2. Properties.**

Omitted.

**Item 3. Legal Proceedings.**

Omitted.

**Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.**

Not applicable.

**PART II**

**Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, RelatedStockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.**

Omitted.

**Item 6. Selected Financial Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of FinancialCondition and Results of Operations.**

Omitted.

**Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures AboutMarket Risk.**

Omitted.

**Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants onAccounting and Financial Disclosure.**

Omitted.

**Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.**

Omitted.

**Item 9B. Other Information.**

None.

**PART III**

**Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and CorporateGovernance.**

Omitted.

**Item 11. Executive Compensation.**

Omitted.

**Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Ownersand Management and Related Stockholder Matters.**

Omitted.

**Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,and Director Independence.**

Omitted.

**Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.**

Omitted.

**ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB**

**Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant ObligorFinancial Information.**

No single obligor represents 10% or more of the pool assetsheld by the issuing entity.

**Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant EnhancementProvider Financial Information.**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any externalcreditenhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction asdescribed under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

**Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain DerivativesInstruments (Financial Information).**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides anyderivative instruments or other support for the certificates within thistransaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

**Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.**

The registrant knows of no material pending legal proceedinginvolving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routinelitigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and thefollowing, with respect to CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer,Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee and Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as certificate administrator and custodian:

On December 1, 2017, a complaint against CWCapital AssetManagement LLC (“CWCAM”) and others was filed in the United States DistrictCourt for the Southern District of New York styled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd.v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., No. 17-cv-9463. The gravamen of thecomplaint alleges breaches of a contract and fiduciary duties by CWCAM’saffiliate, CWCapital Investments LLC in its capacity as collateral manager forthe collateralized debt obligation transaction involving CWCapital Cobalt VrLtd. In total, there are fourteen (14) counts pled in the complaint. Of those14, five (5) claims are asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breachof fiduciary duty, conversion, and unjust enrichment. CWCAM denies the claimsand intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims.

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) and DeutscheBank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued by investors in civillitigation concerning their role as trustees of certain RMBS trusts.

On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including fundsmanaged by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed aderivative action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Courtpurportedly on behalf of and for the benefit of 544 private-label RMBS trustsasserting claims for alleged violations of the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939(“TIA”), breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based onDBNTC and DBTCA’s alleged failure to perform their duties as trustees for thetrusts. Plaintiffs subsequently dismissed their state court complaint and fileda derivative and class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for theSouthern District of New York on behalf of and for the benefit of 564private-label RMBS trusts, which substantially overlapped with the trusts atissue in the state court action. The complaint alleges that the trusts at issuehave suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $89.4 billion, but thecomplaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. DBNTCand DBTCA filed a motion to dismiss, and on January 19, 2016, the courtpartially granted the motion on procedural grounds: as to the 500 trusts thatare governed by pooling and servicing agreements, the court declined toexercise jurisdiction. The court did not rule on substantive defenses assertedin the motion to dismiss. On March 22, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amendedcomplaint in federal court. In the amended complaint, in connection with 62trusts governed by indenture agreements, plaintiffs assert claims for breach ofcontract, violation of the TIA, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of duty toavoid conflicts of interest. The amended complaint alleges that the trusts atissue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $9.8 billion, butthe complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. OnJuly 15, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.On January 23, 2017, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC andDBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss with respectto plaintiffs’ conflict-of-interest claim, thereby dismissing it, and deniedthe motion to dismiss with respect to plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim(except as noted below) and claim for violation of the TIA, thereby allowingthose claims to proceed. On January 26, 2017, the parties filed a jointstipulation and proposed order dismissing plaintiffs’ claim for breach offiduciary duty. On January 27, 2017, the court entered the parties’ jointstipulation and ordered that plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty bedismissed. On February 3, 2017, following a hearing concerning DBNTC andDBTCA’s motion to dismiss on February 2, 2017, the court issued a short formorder dismissing (i) plaintiffs’ representation and warranty claims as to 21trusts whose originators and/or sponsors had entered bankruptcy and thedeadline for asserting claims against such originators and/or sponsors hadpassed as of 2009 and (ii) plaintiffs’ claims to the extent they were premisedupon any alleged pre-event of default duty to terminate servicers. On March 27,2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the amended complaint. On January 26,2018, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. The parties arecurrently briefing the motion. Discovery is ongoing.

On March 25, 2016, the *BlackRock* plaintiffs filed astate court action against DBTCA in the Superior Court of California, OrangeCounty with respect to 513 trusts. On May 18, 2016, plaintiffs filed anamended complaint with respect to 465 trusts, and included DBNTC as anadditional defendant. The amended complaint asserts three causes ofaction: breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; and breach of theduty to avoid conflicts of interest. Plaintiffs purport to bring theaction on behalf of themselves and all other current owners of certificates inthe 465 trusts. The amended complaint alleges that the trusts at issuehave suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $75.7 billion, but doesnot include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On August 22, 2016,DBNTC and DBTCA filed a demurrer as to Plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary dutycause of action and breach of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest cause ofaction and motion to strike as to Plaintiffs’ breach of contract cause ofaction. On October 18, 2016, the court granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s demurrer,providing Plaintiffs with thirty days’ leave to amend, and denied DBNTC andDBTCA’s motion to strike. Plaintiffs did not further amend their complaint and,on December 19, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the amended complaint.On January 17, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. Theparties are currently briefing the motion. Discovery is ongoing.

On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to acase brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SFLimited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, inwhich the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served astrustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffsfiled a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition toDBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC servesas trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaintbrings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciaryduty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breachof the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint,plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the courtdismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and gross negligence claims,Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certaintheories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only includethese claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of“hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filedan answer to the third amended complaint. Discovery is ongoing.

On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to acase brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. District Court forthe Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously allegedincorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. OnNovember 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that namesDBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue.Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA;breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of theStreit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the secondamended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to thecase, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed bypooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claimsfor breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes theseclaims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint allegesthat DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions ofdollars in losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for moneydamages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answerto the second amended complaint. Discovery is ongoing.

On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidationand IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State ofNew York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of thetrusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breachof contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts ofinterest, violation of New York’s Streit Act, violation of the Trust IndentureAct, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the UniformCommercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S.$268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together withseveral other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion todismiss. On January 6, 2017, IKB filed a notice of discontinuance, voluntarilydismissing with prejudice all claims as to three trusts. As of January 17,2017, DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss has been briefed and is awaitingdecision by the court. On June 20, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarilydismissing with prejudice all claims as to four additional trusts. Certainlimited discovery is permitted to go forward while the motion to dismiss ispending.

It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings(including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed inthe foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to performits duties as trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement******relatingto this transaction.

On June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors filed acivil complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County,against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo Bank”) in its capacity as trusteeunder 276 residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts, which waslater amended on July 18, 2014, to increase the number of trusts to 284 RMBStrusts. On November 24, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarilydismiss the state court action without prejudice. That same day, a group ofinstitutional investors filed a putative class action complaint in the UnitedStates District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “DistrictCourt”) against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging claims against the bank in itscapacity as trustee for 274 RMBS trusts (the “Federal Court Complaint”). InDecember 2014, the plaintiffs’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their originalstate court action was granted. As with the prior state court action, theFederal Court Complaint is one of six similar complaints filed contemporaneouslyagainst RMBS trustees (Deutsche Bank, Citibank, HSBC, Bank of New York Mellonand US Bank) by a group of institutional investor plaintiffs. The Federal CourtComplaint against Wells Fargo Bank alleges that the trustee caused losses toinvestors and asserts causes of action based upon, among other things, thetrustee's alleged failure to: (i) notify and enforce repurchase obligations ofmortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties,(ii) notify investors of alleged events of default, and (iii) abide byappropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Reliefsought includes money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement ofexpenses, and equitable relief. Other cases alleging similar causes of action havebeen filed against Wells Fargo Bank and other trustees in the District Court byRMBS investors in these and other transactions, and these cases against WellsFargo Bank are proceeding before the same District Court judge. A similarcomplaint was also filed May 27, 2016 in New York state court by a differentplaintiff investor. On January 19, 2016, an order was entered in connectionwith the Federal Court Complaint in which the District Court declined toexercise jurisdiction over 261 trusts at issue in the Federal Court Complaint;the District Court also allowed plaintiffs to file amended complaints as to theremaining, non-dismissed trusts, if they so chose, and three amended complaintshave been filed. On December 17, 2016, the investor plaintiffs in the 261trusts dismissed from the Federal Court Complaint filed a new complaint in NewYork state court (the “State Court Complaint”). In September 2017, Royal ParkInvestments SA/NV (“Royal Park”), one of the plaintiffs in the District Courtcases against Wells Fargo Bank, filed a putative class action complaintrelating to two trusts seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and moneydamages based on Wells Fargo Bank’s indemnification from trust funds for legalfees and expenses Wells Fargo Bank incurs or has incurred in defending theDistrict Court case filed by Royal Park. With respect to the foregoinglitigations, Wells Fargo Bank believes plaintiffs' claims are without merit andintends to contest the claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as tothe outcome of the litigations or the possible impact of the litigations onWells Fargo Bank or the RMBS trusts.

**Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and CertainRelationships and Related Transactions.**

The information regarding this Item has been previouslyprovided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuingentity filed on June 5, 2012 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).

**Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with ApplicableServicing Criteria.**

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attachedhereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit Oto the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entitiesparticipating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for eachapplicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

**Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.**

The servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibitsto this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

**PART IV**

**Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules**

(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part ofthis Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Not applicable

(2) Not applicable

(3) See below

4             Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, by and among GSMortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administratorand Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4 to theregistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2012 under CommissionFile No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by reference herein).

10.1        Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, between GS MortgageSecurities Corporation II and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (filed as Exhibit10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2012under Commission File No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by reference herein)

10.2        Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, between GS MortgageSecurities Corporation II and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (filed asExhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23,2012 under Commission File No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by referenceherein)

10.3        Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, between GS MortgageSecurities Corporation II and Archetype Mortgage Funding I LLC (filed asExhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23,2012 under Commission File No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by referenceherein)

10.4        Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, between GS MortgageSecurities Corporation II and Jefferies LoanCore LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.4 tothe registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2012 underCommission File No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by reference herein)

31           Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

33           Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

33.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer

33.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

33.3        Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (Omitted. See ExplanatoryNotes.)

33.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator

33.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian

33.6        Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor

33.7        CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant

33.8        National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant

34           Attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

34.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer

34.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

34.3        Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (Omitted. See ExplanatoryNotes.)

34.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator

34.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian

34.6        Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor

34.7        CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant

34.8        National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant

35           Servicer compliance statements.

35.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer

35.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

35.3        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator

(b)   The exhibits required to be filed by theRegistrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above and in theExhibit Index that immediately follows the signature page hereof.

(c)    Not Applicable.

 

 

**SIGNATURES**

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report tobe signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

GS Mortgage Securities CorporationII(Depositor)

/s/ LeahNivison

LeahNivison, Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)

Date: March 23, 2018

 

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.

4             Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, by and among GS MortgageSecurities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administratorand Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4 to theregistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2012 under CommissionFile No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by reference herein).

10.1        MortgageLoan Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, between GS MortgageSecurities Corporation II and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (filed as Exhibit10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2012under Commission File No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by reference herein)

10.2        MortgageLoan Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, between GS MortgageSecurities Corporation II and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (filed asExhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23,2012 under Commission File No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by referenceherein)

10.3        MortgageLoan Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, between GS MortgageSecurities Corporation II and Archetype Mortgage Funding I LLC (filed asExhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23,2012 under Commission File No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by referenceherein)

10.4        MortgageLoan Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, between GS MortgageSecurities Corporation II and Jefferies LoanCore LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.4 tothe registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2012 underCommission File No. 333-171508-03 and incorporated by reference herein)

31           Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

33           Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

 

33.1        Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer

33.2        CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, as Special Servicer

33.3        Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee(Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.4        Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator

33.5        Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian

33.6        Situs Holdings, LLC, asOperating Advisor

33.7        CoreLogic CommercialReal Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant

33.8        National Tax Search,LLC, as Servicing Function Participant

34           Attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

 

34.1        Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer

34.2        CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, as Special Servicer

34.3        Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee(Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.4        Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator

34.5        Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian

34.6        Situs Holdings, LLC, asOperating Advisor

34.7        CoreLogic CommercialReal Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant

34.8        National Tax Search,LLC, as Servicing Function Participant

35           Servicer compliance statements.

 

35.1        Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer

35.2        CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, as Special Servicer

35.3        Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator