Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules 11737 

was not used for the initial LFSM/ 

LFSMD paired sample set.) The lowlevel LFSM/LFSMD fortification 

concentration must be within ±50% of 

the MRL for each contaminant (e.g., for 

an MRL of 1 μg/L the acceptable 

fortification levels must be between 0.5 

μg/L and 1.5 μg/L). The mid-level 

LFSM/LFSMD fortification 

concentration must be within ±20% of 

the mid-level calibration standard for 

each contaminant, and should 

represent, where possible and where the 

laboratory has data from previously 

analyzed samples, an approximate 

average concentration observed in 

previous analyses of that analyte. There 

are no UCMR contaminant recovery 

acceptance criteria specified for LFSM/ 

LFSMD analyses. All LFSM/LFSMD 

data are to be reported. 

* * * * * 

(vi) Reporting. You must require your 

laboratory to submit these data 

electronically to the State and EPA 

using EPA’s electronic data reporting 

system, accessible at (http:// 

water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/ 

ucmr/ucmr3/reporting.cfm), within 60 

days from the sample collection date. 

You then have 30 days from when the 

laboratory posts the data to review, 

approve and submit the data to the State 

and EPA, via EPA’s electronic data 

reporting system. If you do not 

electronically approve and submit the 

laboratory data to EPA within 30 days 

of the laboratories posting to EPA’s 

electronic reporting system, the data 

will be considered approved and 

available for State and EPA review. 

* * * * * 

PART 142—NATIONAL PRIMARY 

DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS 

IMPLEMENTATION 

5. The authority citation for part 142 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300f, 300g–1, 300g– 

2, 300g–3, 300g–4, 300g–5, 300g–6, 300j–4, 

300j–9, and 300j–11. 

Subpart B—Primary Enforcement 

Responsibility 

6. Section 142.16 is amended as 

follows: 

a. In paragraph (j) introductory text by 

removing ‘‘§ 141.40’’. 

b. In paragraph (j)(1) by revising the 

first sentence. 

§ 142.16 Special primacy requirements. 

* * * * * 

(j) * * * 

(1) If a State chooses to issue waivers 

from the monitoring requirements in 

§§ 141.23 and 141.24, the State shall 

describe the procedures and criteria 

which it will use to review waiver 

applications and issue wavier 

determinations. * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–4641 Filed 3–2–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 10–108; Report No. 2925] 

Petition for Reconsideration of Action 

of Rulemaking Proceeding 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Petition for reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: In this document, a Petition 

for Reconsideration (Petition) has been 

filed in the Commission’s Rulemaking 

proceeding listed in this document 

(Table of Allotments, FM Broadcast 

Stations (Pacific Junction, Iowa)). 

DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must 

be filed by March 18, 2011. Replies to 

an opposition must be filed March 28, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2180. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of Commission’s document, 

Report No. 2925, released February 7, 

2011. The full text of this document is 

available for viewing and copying in 

Room CY–B402, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC or may be purchased 

from the Commission’s copy contractor, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1– 

800–378–3160). The Commission will 

not send a copy of this Notice pursuant 

to the Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because this Notice 

does not have an impact on any rules of 

particular applicability. 

This document is published pursuant 

to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See 1.4(b)(1) of the 

Commission’s rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). 

Subject: In the Matter of Amendment 

of Section 73.202(b), Table of 

Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations 

(Pacific Junction, Iowa) (MB Docket No. 

10–108). 

Number of Petitions Filed: 1. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Bulah P. Wheeler, 

Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary, 

Office of Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4687 Filed 3–2–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 648 

[Docket No. 090225241–0561–02] 

RIN 0648–AX70 

Fisheries of the Northeastern United 

States; Monkfish; Amendment 5 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; amendment; 

request for comments. 

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to 

implement measures in Amendment 5 

to the Monkfish Fishery Management 

Plan (Monkfish FMP). The New England 

and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 

Councils (Councils) developed 

Amendment 5 to bring the Monkfish 

FMP into compliance with the annual 

catch limit (ACL) and accountability 

measure (AM) requirements of the 

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act 

(Magnuson-Stevens Act). NMFS is 

considering disapproving proposed 

annual catch targets (ACT) that are not 

consistent with the most recent 

scientific advice. This proposed rule 

also proposes three management 

measures in Amendment 5 to promote 

efficiency and reduce waste: Automatic 

days-at-sea (DAS) adjustment for trip 

limit overages; authorization to land 

monkfish heads; and enable changes to 

the Monkfish Research Set-Aside (RSA) 

Program through framework adjustment, 

and to bring the biological and 

management reference points in the 

Monkfish FMP into compliance with 

recently revised National Standard 1 

(NS1) Guidelines. 

DATES: Public comments must be 

received no later than 5 p.m., eastern 

standard time, on April 4, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: An environmental 

assessment (EA) was prepared for 

Amendment 5 that describes the 

proposed action and other considered 

alternatives, and provides a thorough 

analysis of the impacts of the proposed 

measures and alternatives. Copies of 

Amendment 5, including the EA and the 

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

(IRFA), are available on request from 

Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New 

England Fishery Management Council 

(Council), 50 Water Street, 

Newburyport, MA 01950. These 

documents are also available online at 

http://www.nefmc.org. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS