alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007006EN.01000502.xml

| 11.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4491 — DHC/KP1)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/10)

On 22 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4491. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4491. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
### §1151a. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section, act June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VII, §77, 48 Stat. 272, prohibited formation of agricultural credit corporations after June 16, 1933.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-1
 
                          CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             -----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
                                                               1998       1997       1996       1995       1994
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Available earnings:
  Net income (loss)........................................  $  36,458  $  27,630  $  14,941  $   8,212  $   2,359
  Add interest expense (1).................................     15,476     10,871     10,992     12,985     12,157
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Available earnings (loss) (2)..............................  $  51,934  $  38,501  $  25,933  $  21,197  $  14,516
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense.........................................  $  15,476  $  10,871  $  10,992  $  12,985  $  12,157
  Capitalized interest.....................................      2,214        893        142         20         63
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Total fixed charges........................................  $  17,690  $  11,764  $  11,134  $  13,005  $  12,220
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.........................       2.94       3.27       2.33       1.63       1.19
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
NOTES:
 
(1) Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing costs.
 
(2) Interest portion of rental expense is not calculated because annual rental
    expense for the Company is not significant.
 
                                      F-32
The single most important way you can stay healthy

is to be an active member of your own health care

team. One way to get high-quality health care is to

find and use information and take an active role in

all of the decisions made about your care. This card

will help you when making decisions about medical

tests.

Doctors order blood tests, x-rays, and other tests to

help diagnose medical problems. Perhaps you do not

know why you need a particular test or you don’t

understand how it will help you. Here are some

questions to ask: 

1. How is the test done? 

2. What kind of information will the test provide? 

3. Is this test the only way to find out that

information? 

4. What are the benefits and risks of having this test? 

5. How accurate is the test? 

6. What do I need to do to prepare for the test? (What

you do or don’t do may affect the accuracy of the

test results.) 

7. Will the test be uncomfortable? 

8. How long will it take to get the results, and how

will I get them? 

9. What’s the next step after the test? 

One study found that anywhere from 10 percent to

30 percent of Pap smear test results that were called

“normal” were not. Errors such as this can lead to a

wrong or delayed diagnosis. You want your tests to

be done the right way, and you want accurate results. 

(over)

uick Tips—

When Getting Medical Tests
What can you do? 

• For tests your doctor sends to a lab, ask which lab

he or she uses, and why. You may want to know

that the doctor chooses a certain lab because he or

she has business ties to it. Or, the health plan may

require that the tests go there. 

• Check to see that the lab is accredited by a group

such as the College of American Pathologists 

(800-323-4040) or the Joint Commission on

Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

(telephone 630-792-5800; Web site

http://www.jcaho.org).

• If you need a mammogram, make sure the facility

is approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

You can find out by checking the certificate in the

facility. Or, call 800-4-CANCER 9:00 a.m.-4:30

p.m. EST to find out the names and locations of

certified facilities near you. 

What about the test results? 

• Do not assume that no news is good news. If you

do not hear from your doctor, call to get your test

results. 

• If you and your doctor think the test results may

not be right, have the test done again.

Remember, quality matters, especially when it

comes to your health. For more information on

health care quality and materials to help you make

health care decisions, visit

http://www.ahrq.gov/consumer/pathqpack.htm

www.ahrq.gov

AHRQ Pub. No. 01-0040b
§ 513.34 What opportunity is there for a voluntary repayment agreement when the Commission is the creditor agency? ( a ) In response to a Notice of Intent, an employee may propose to repay the debt voluntarily in lieu of salary offset by submitting a written proposed repayment schedule to the Commission. A proposal must be received by the Commission within 15 calendar days after the employee is sent the Notice of Intent.
( b ) The Commission will notify the employee whether, within the Commission's discretion, the proposed repayment schedule is acceptable.
( c ) If the proposed repayment schedule is unacceptable, the employee will have 15 calendar days from the date the notice of the decision is received in which to file a request for a hearing.
( d ) If the proposed repayment schedule is acceptable or the employee agrees to a modification proposed by the Commission, the agreement will be put in writing and signed by the employee and the Commission.
TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transfer Technology International Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chris Trina, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Chris TrinaChris TrinaChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 16, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Transfer Technology International Corp. and will be retained by Transfer Technology International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Publications             
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeCareersCBRN

cb

cb

cb

 

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Granibras Granitos Brasileiros, Ltda., Respondent, v Salik Farber, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[823 NYS2d 390]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered November 29, 2005, which vacated the court’s prior order relieving defendants of a default judgment and granted plaintiffs motion to proceed with enforcement proceedings upon defendants’ failure to comply with the court’s directive that they file an undertaking, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While public policy supports having actions determined on their merits, a party may not simply ignore applicable time constraints, whether imposed by judicial, statutory or other mandate, and expect to suffer no consequences. In order to vacate a default judgment, a party must establish the existence of a meritorious defense and a reasonable excuse for the default (CFLR 5015 [a] [1]). Defendant Farber, who was afforded ample opportunity to avoid the entry of a default judgment, does not even attempt to demonstrate that he had an excuse for the default or a meritorious defense to the claims asserted by plaintiff.

As this Court observed in *Hyundai Corp. v Republic of Iraq*(20 AD3d 56, 62 [2005], *appeal withdrawn and discontinued*6 NY3d 808 [2006]), a “court’s discretion to relieve a party from a default judgment should not be favorably exercised where, as here, the party has been dilatory in asserting its rights.” Moreover, a “certain amount of discretion is reserved to the [motion] court in crafting conditional orders to encourage the cooperation of neglectful parties so that their claims can be litigated on the merits,” and a party “ignores such conditional orders at his peril” *(Becerril v Skate Way Roller Rink,*184 AD2d 365, 366 [1992]). Thus, in addition to showing no basis to vacate the default judgment, this defendant has made no effort to explain his failure to post the undertaking required by the court as a condition of vacating the default. Concur—Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of Penton Media, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Company's quarterly report for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2004              /s/ David B. Nussbaum
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       David B. Nussbaum
                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                       /s/ Preston L. Vice
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Preston L. Vice
                                       Chief Financial Officer
§ 227.28 Cancellations. Leases shall be irrevocable except for breach of the terms and conditions of the same and may be forfeited and cancelled by an appropriate proceeding in the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming whenever the lessee fails to comply with their terms and conditions; the lessee may, on approval of the Secretary of the Interior, surrender a lease or any part of it: ( a ) That he make application for cancellation to the superintendent having jurisdiction over the land.
( b ) That he pay a surrender fee of $1 at the time the application is made.
( c ) That he pay all royalties and rentals due to the date of such application.
( d ) That he make a satisfactory showing that full provision has been made for conservation and protection of the property and that all wells, drilled on the portion of the lease surrendered, have been properly abandoned.
( e ) If the lease has been recorded, that he file, with his application, a recorded release of the acreage covered by the application.
( f ) If the application is for the cancellation of the entire lease or the entire undivided portion, that he surrender the lease: *Provided,* That where the application is made by an assignee to whom no copy of the lease was delivered, he will be required to surrender only his copy of the assignment.
( g ) If the lease (or portion being surrendered or canceled) is owned in undivided interests by more than one party, then all parties shall join in the application for cancellation.
( h ) That all required fees and papers must be in the mail or received on or before the date upon which rents and royalties become due, in order for the lessee and his surety to be relieved from liability for the payment of such royalties and rentals.
( i ) In the event oil or gas is being drained from the leased premises by wells not covered by the lease; the lease, or any part of it may be surrendered, only on such terms and conditions as the Secretary of the Interior may determine to be reasonable and equitable.
### §25. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 1, 1922, ch. 257, §2, 42 Stat. 767, repealed all acts extending the period of succession of national banking associations for 20 years, and made paragraph Second of section 24 applicable in that respect.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 29, 2008

Mr. Joseph R. Knight

Baker & Botts, L.L.P.

98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1500

Austin, TX 78701-4039

Mr. Michael W. Huddleston

Shannon Gracey Ratliff & Miller, L.L.P.

500 N. Akard Street, Suite 2500

Dallas, TX 75201

Mr. Ian B. Cosby

Susman Godrey LLP

1201 Third Avenue,  Suite 3800

Seattle, WA 98101

Mr. Kevin F. Risley

Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P.

One Riverway, Suite 1600

Houston, TX 77056

Mr. Eric J. Mayer

Susman Godfrey, L.L.P.

1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100

Houston, TX 77002-5096

RE:Case Number:  06-1030

Court of Appeals Number:  05-04-01729-CV

Trial Court Number:  01-06036-L

Style:ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

v.

NOKIA, INCORPORATED

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-1030Page 2**
#### § 519.1 Designation of an agent by a tribe.

By written notification to the Commission, a tribe shall designate an agent for service of any official determination, order, or notice of violation.
EX-35.1
(logo) Deutsche Bank


1761 East St. Andrew Place
Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

Tel 714 247 6000
Fax 714 247 6009


ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,
as the Trustee (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), by and among, Wells
Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of
PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC,
as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate
Administrator, Tax Administrator, and Custodian, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as Trustee here by certifies in accordance with Section 11.11 of the
Agreement:

A) A review of such Certifying Servicer's activities during the preceding
   calendar year and of such Certifying Servicer's performance under the
   Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and
B) That, as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
   Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in
   all material respects during the preceding calendar year.

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
as Trustee

/s/ David Co
BY: David Co
Title: Director
Date: March 1, 2014
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-32 

1981 PBGC LEXIS 9 

September 25, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4204 Sale of Assets

4204(a)(1)(B) Sale of Assets. Withdrawal - Posting of Security 

OPINION: 

 This responds to your request for an advisory opinion concerning satisification of the escrow requirement of Section

4204(a)(1)(B) of ERISA. Specifically you wish to know whether the deposit of a letter of credit in an escrow account

may satisfy the requirement. 

Section 4204(a)(1) provides that a withdrawal from a multiemployer plan "does not occur solely . . . as a result of

a bona fide, arm's-length sale of assets to an unrelated party" provided that certain conditions are met. Section

4204(a)(2)(B) provides one of the conditions: 

(B) the purchaser provides to the plan for a period of 5 plan years commencing with the first plan year beginning

after the sale of assets, a bond issued by a corporate surety company that is an acceptable surety for purposes of Section

412 of this Act, or an amount held in escrow by a bank or similar financial institution satisfactory to the plan, in an

amount equal to the greater of -- 

(i) the average annual contribution required to be made by the seller with respect to the operations under the plan

for the 3 plan years preceding the plan year in which the sale [*2] of the employer's assets occurs, or 

(ii) the annual contribution that the seller was required to make with respect to the operations under the plan for the

last plan year before the plan year in which the sale of the assets occurs, 

which bond or escrow shall be paid to the plan if the purchaser withdraws from the plan, or fails to make a

contribution to the plan when due, at any time during the first 5 plan years beginning after the sale. . . . [Emphasis

added.] 

 In our view a letter of credit held in escrow satisfies the requirements of Section 4204(a)(1)(B). We note, however,

that it is within the plan's discretion whether a given institution is an acceptable party to hold a letter of credit in escrow

under Section 4204(a)(1)(B). The plan sponsor is responsible under Section 4204 for determining the acceptability of

any agreements such as those which you provided for our examination. 

Mitchell L. Strickler 

Deputy General Counsel
#### MANEOLA S. JENNINGS v. HELOISA JESSEN

No. 247A89

(Filed 18 January 1990)

APPEAL of right by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 93 N.C. App. 731, 379 S.E.2d 53 (1989), affirming the judgment of *Friday, J.,*at the 15 September 1987 Session of Superior Court, FORSYTH County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 December 1989.

*44
      *Molitoris & Connolly, by Theodore M. Molitoris, for plaintiffappellee.*

*William L. Durham for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Greene, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The judgment of the trial court is vacated. The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Forsyth County, for new findings, new conclusions, and the entry of a new order.

Reversed and remanded.
# C_2006268EN.01000702.xml

| 4.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4298 — Aggregate Industries/Foster Yeoman)

(2006/C 268/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4298. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4298. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
### PD-1032&1033-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/10/2015 5:01:20 PM Accepted 8/11/2015 4:32:31 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK