alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the QuarterlyReport of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the “**Company**”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”),each of the undersigned officers does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

               (1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

               (2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 9, 2006 |   | /s/ David J. Moore                                                            |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                          |
|                    |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                 |
|                    |   |                                                                          |
|                    |   |                                                                          |
| Dated: November 9, 2006 |   | /s/ Jonathan K. Hsu                                                           |
|                    |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating  Office and Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                                  |

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

1

----
#### § 286.16 Grant approval authority.

Applications for grants require approval by the Assistant Secretary.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis

REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY AND INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM v. Record No. 0353-96-3 AUGUST 6, 1996

RALPH ALLEN FRYE

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Kathryn Spruill Lingle; Midkiff & Hiner, on brief), for appellants. (Ginger Jonas Largen; Morefield, Kendrick, Hess & Largen, on brief), for appellee.

Reynolds Metals Company and its insurer (hereinafter collectively referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that it failed to prove that Ralph Allen Frye was able to return to his pre-injury work as of February 2, 1995. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule

5A:27. "General principles of workman's compensation law provide that '[i]n an application for review of any award on the ground of change in condition, the burden is on the party alleging such change to prove his allegations by a preponderance of the

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 evidence.'" Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Bateman , 4 Va. App. 459, 464, 359 S.E.2d 98, 101 (1987) (quoting Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Reeves , 1 Va. App. 435, 438-39, 339 S.E.2d 570, 572 (1986)). Furthermore, "it is fundamental that a finding of fact made by the Commission is conclusive and binding upon this court on review. A question raised by conflicting medical opinion is a question of fact." Commonwealth v. Powell , 2 Va. App. 712, 714, 347 S.E.2d 532, 533 (1986). The commission accepted the opinions of Drs. Neal A. Jewell and Pierce D. Nelson. Their opinions support the commission's conclusion that Frye was not able to fully perform all of the duties of his pre-injury work as of February 2, 1995. In its role as fact finder, the commission rejected the contrary opinion of Dr. Jim C. Brasfield. "Questions raised by conflicting medical opinions must be decided by the commission." Penley v.

Island Creek Coal Co. , 8 Va. App. 310, 318, 381 S.E.2d 231, 236 (1989). The restrictions Dr. Jewell placed upon Frye's physical abilities in 1992 and 1995 were consistent with a 1991 strength evaluation report. The record supports the commission's finding that no evidence showed that Frye's condition had improved significantly since the 1991 study. Therefore, the commission did not err in relying upon the study, which supports the commission's finding that Frye's pre-injury work was unsuitable to his residual capacity.3 Based upon this record, we cannot conclude as a matter of law that employer's evidence sustained its burden of proving that Frye was able to return to his pre-injury work as of February 2,

1995. Tomko v. Michael's Plastering Co. , 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d 833, 835 (1970). Accordingly, we affirm the commission's

decision.

Affirmed.
J.

2
DMIIIROME1 WEIN been absent from her life, and the court determined that termination of appellant's parental rights was in the child's best interest. See NRS 128.105(1). Having considered the appellate record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the district court's order terminating appellant's parental rights. See In re of Parental Rights as to

### D.R.H., 120 Nev. 422, 428, 92 P.3d 1230, 1234 (2004). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
Hardesty ' J.
Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division Philip J.T. Kainen Law Group, PLLC Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Eighth District Court Clerk 'Appellant has filed a request for the preparation of the transcript. We have determined that the transcript is unnecessary to make a decision in this matter. Appellant has also filed a motion for permission to file briefs. Having concluded that appellant's civil appeal statement is sufficient to address the merits of this appeal, we deny appellant's motion.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Manchester United plc (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
30 June 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward Woodward, Executive Vice Chairman of the Company and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Date:
27 February 2015

By:

/s/ EDWARD WOODWARD Edward Woodward Executive Vice Chairman
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
# C_2006224EN.01004502.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/45

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 July 2006 — Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia/Commission

(Case T-357/05) (1)

1

(Cohesion Fund - Representation by a lawyer - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2006/C 224/97)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia — Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) (represented by J.-V. Sánchez-Tarazaga Marcelino)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Escobar Guerrero and A. Weimar, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C (2005) 1867 final of 27 June 2005, concerning the reduction of the assistance initially granted from the Cohesion Fund to Project Group No 97/11/61/028, concerning the collection and treatment of waste waters on the Mediterranean coast of the Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia (Spain).

Operative part of the order

| (1) | The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

| (2) | There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene.

| (3) | The applicant shall bear its own costs, as well as those of the Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The applicant shall bear its own costs, as well as those of the Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the application to intervene.

| (4) | The applicant, the Commission and the Comunidad autónoma de Andalucia — Junta de Andalucia shall bear their own costs relating to their respective applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The applicant, the Commission and the Comunidad autónoma de Andalucia — Junta de Andalucia shall bear their own costs relating to their respective applications to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 281 of 12.11.2005.

1

---
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 
-  Pipeline Technical Resources 
-  Control Room Management 

# In This Section

                      -  Pipeline Technical Resources 
                      -  Control Room Management (CRM) Overview 
                      -  CRM Fatigue Mitigation 
                      -  CRM Key Documents 
                      -  CRM Workshops and Inspection Guidance 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Control Room Management FAQs                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          PHMSA's CRM Initiative Inspection Analytics April 2021 (PowerPoint)                   

# Control Room Management

Welcome. This site is administered by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), and provides information concerning regulations for Control Room Management (CRM) for gas and hazardous liquid pipelines regulated under 49 CFR Parts 192 and 195, respectively.

PHMSA’s pipeline safety regulations prescribe safety requirements for controllers, control rooms, and SCADA systems used to remotely monitor and control pipeline operations. The regulations address engineering and management solutions related to human factors to enhance the performance reliability of operator personnel that control pipeline operations. These regulations generate significant public benefits by reducing the number and consequences of shortfalls in control room management practices and operator errors when remotely monitoring and controlling pipeline facilities and responding to abnormal and emergency conditions. This site provides information about PHMSA’s implementation of Control Room Management oversight, and links to other educational information on human factors and human operational performance. For more information on the history of these regulations, visit PHMSA docket number PHMSA–2007–27954 at www.regulations.gov or visit Key Documents on this website.
### Lithostratigraphy and depositional environments of the Lexington Limestone (Ordovician) of central Kentucky

By: Earle Rupert Cressman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp768

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (15492 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (4615 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (3990 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (2437 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 4**                            (1903 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 5**                            (3125 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 6**                            (4070 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 7**                            (2329 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 8**                            (2216 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 9**                            (1378 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 10**                            (603 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 11**                            (1249 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### SUBCHAPTER XV—BANK EXAMINATIONS
§ 17.140 Dissemination of policy. ( a ) *Notification of policy.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall implement specific and continuing steps to notify applicants for admission and employment, students and parents of elementary and secondary school students, employees, sources of referral of applicants for admission and employment, and all unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient, that it does not discriminate on the basis of sex in the educational programs or activities that it operates, and that it is required by Title IX and these Title IX regulations not to discriminate in such a manner. Such notification shall contain such information, and be made in such manner, as the designated agency official finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by Title IX and these Title IX regulations, but shall state at least that the requirement not to discriminate in education programs or activities extends to employment therein, and to admission thereto unless §§ 17.300 through 17.310 do not apply to the recipient, and that inquiries concerning the application of Title IX and these Title IX regulations to such recipient may be referred to the employee designated pursuant to § 17.135, or to the designated agency official.
( 2 ) Each recipient shall make the initial notification required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section within 90 days of March 6, 2003 or of the date these Title IX regulations first apply to such recipient, whichever comes later, which notification shall include publication in: ( i ) Newspapers and magazines operated by such recipient or by student, alumnae, or alumni groups for or in connection with such recipient; and
( ii ) Memoranda or other written communications distributed to every student and employee of such recipient.
( b ) *Publications.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall prominently include a statement of the policy described in paragraph (a) of this section in each announcement, bulletin, catalog, or application form that it makes available to any person of a type, described in paragraph (a) of this section, or which is otherwise used in connection with the recruitment of students or employees.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not use or distribute a publication of the type described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section that suggests, by text or illustration, that such recipient treats applicants, students, or employees differently on the basis of sex except as such treatment is permitted by these Title IX regulations.
( c ) *Distribution.* Each recipient shall distribute without discrimination on the basis of sex each publication described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and shall apprise each of its admission and employment recruitment representatives of the policy of nondiscrimination described in paragraph (a) of this section, and shall require such representatives to adhere to such policy.
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.204 Mink Enteritis Vaccine, Killed Virus. Mink Enteritis Vaccine, Killed Virus, shall be prepared from virus-bearing cell culture fluids or tissues obtained from mink that have developed mink enteritis following inoculation with virulent mink enteritis virus. Each serial shall meet the applicable requirements prescribed in § 113.200 and special requirements prescribed in this section. Any serial found unsatisfactory by a prescribed test shall not be released. ( a ) *Safety test.* Vaccinates used in the potency test in paragraph (b) of this section shall be observed each day prior to challenge. If unfavorable reactions attributable to the vaccine occur, the serial is unsatisfactory. If unfavorable reactions not attributable to the vaccine occur, the test shall be declared a No Test and may be repeated: *Provided,* That, if the test is not repeated, the serial is unsatisfactory.
( b ) *Potency test.* Bulk or final container samples of completed product shall be tested for potency using 10 mink enteritis susceptible mink (five vaccinates and five controls) as follows: ( 1 ) *Vaccination.* Each of the five vaccinates shall be injected with one dose of vaccine as recommended on the label and observed each day for 14 days.
( 2 ) *Challenge.* At least 2 weeks after the last inoculation, the five vaccinates and the five controls shall be challenged with virulent mink enteritis virus and observed each day for 12 days. Fecal material shall be collected on one day between days 4-8 (inclusive) postchallenge from each test animal that remains free of enteric signs and tested for the presence of mink enteritis virus by cell culture with fluorescent antibody examination.
( 3 ) *Interpretation.* A serial is satisfactory if at least 80 percent of the vaccinates remain free of enteric signs and do not shed virus in the feces, while at least 80 percent of the controls develop clinical signs of mink enteritis or shed virus in the feces. If at least 80 percent of the vaccinates remain free of enteric signs and do not shed virus in the feces, while less than 80 percent of the controls develop clinical signs of mink enteritis or shed virus in the feces, the test is considered a No Test and may be repeated: *Provided,* That, if at least 80 percent of the vaccinates do not remain well and free of detectable virus in the feces, the serial is unsatisfactory.
[39 FR 27428, July 29, 1974. Redesignated at 55 FR 35562, Aug. 31, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66786, Dec. 26, 1991; 60 FR 14361, Mar. 17, 1995]
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# PD-12(R): New York regulations re transfer and interim storage of hazardous waste
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Krakoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

|By: |  | /s/ROBERT L. KRAKOFFRobert L. Krakoff
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
December 6, 2002

---

QuickLinks
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

# Modal acoustic emission (MAE) Examination Standard for Periodic Inspection and Testing (Requalification) of Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels (COPVs)

MAE-Specification-DOT-Composite-Tubes-July2021.pdf (852.49 KB)

This document (standard) describes the use of modal acoustic emission (MAE) examination that use during periodic inspection and testing (Requalification) of hoop wrapped and fully wrapped composite transportable gas cylinders and tubes. This standard covers type II, III and IV COPVs, with metallic and non-metallic liners or of lineless construction, intended for compressed and liquefied gases under pressure.

This standard addresses the requalification of composite overwrapped pressure vessels (COPVs) that are designed and constructed in accordance with ISO standards (11119-1, 11119- 2, 11119-3, 11515 and 17519) and COPVs (composite cylinders/tubes) that are listed in DOT special permits (e.g. DOT-SP 14951, DOT-SP 20391).

This standard authorizes requalification of COPVs by using MAE examination in lieu of hydraulic proof pressure testing and internal visual inspection.

For technical question, contact Mr. Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*