alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errorsthat may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
-  Home 

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Fax:**202-366-4566****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Pipeline Rulemaking Implementation 

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety, provides technical information on selected pipeline safety topics. This information is oriented primarily toward operators to provide information useful for complying with the pipeline safety regulations; however, all stakeholders may find this material informative. This site is updated as needed to reflect new developments or to include information pertinent to these topics.

### Recent Rulemakings

Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines: MAOP Reconfirmation, Expansion of Assessment Requirements, and Other Related Amendments, RIN 1, October 1, 2019
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1323 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-212-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
### §12523. Risk insured

(a) In General.—The insurance program shall insure members of the Ready Reserve against the risk of being ordered into covered service.

(b) Entitlement to Benefits.—(1) An insured member ordered into covered service shall be entitled to payment of a benefit for each month (and fraction thereof) of covered service that exceeds 30 days of covered service, except that no member may be paid under the insurance program for more than 12 months of covered service served during any period of 18 consecutive months.

(2) Payment shall be based solely on the insured status of a member and on the period of covered service served by the member. Proof of loss of income or of expenses incurred as a result of covered service may not be required.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §512(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 300.)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 77 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 25, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 514) to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to strengthen and 
clarify prohibitions on electronic eavesdropping, and for other purposes. The 
first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against 
consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII 
are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Commerce. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Each section of the bill 
shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the 
Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the 
basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in 
the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose and in 
clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The 
Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during 
further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded 
vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for 
electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote 
without intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic 
voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 89.40 General policy. In ordinary circumstances, legal services with respect to trust resources are provided for Indian tribe(s): ( a ) By private counsel employed by tribes when such tribe is financially able and elects to do so, or
( b ) By the United States as trustee through the Office of the Solicitor and/or the Department of Justice.
It is the policy of the Department of the Interior not to use federally appropriated funds to pay for private counsel to represent Indian tribes. Exceptions to that policy are listed in § 89.41 of this part.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Manchester United plc (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
30 June 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward Woodward, Executive Vice Chairman of the Company and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Date:
27 October 2014

By:

/s/ EDWARD WOODWARD Edward Woodward Executive Vice Chairman
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
#### § 81.14 May Secretarial elections be scheduled at the same time as tribal elections?

The Secretarial Election Board will, generally, avoid scheduling Secretarial elections at the same time as tribal elections to avoid confusion. If the Secretarial Election Board decides to schedule a Secretarial election at the same time as a tribal election, the Secretarial Election Board must clearly inform eligible voters of any differences between the tribal election and the Secretarial election and separate ballots must be used for each type of election.
### **CHAPTER 38A—SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE**

Sec.
3751.
Findings and purpose.
3752.
Definitions.
3753.
Applicability.
3754.
Designation of foreclosure commissioner.
3755.
Prerequisites to foreclosure.
3756.
Commencement of foreclosure.
3757.
Notice of default and foreclosure sale.
3758.
Service of notice of foreclosure sale.
3759.
Presale reinstatement.
3760.
Conduct of sale; adjournment.
3761.
Foreclosure costs.
3762.
Disposition of sale proceeds.
3763.
Transfer of title and possession.
3764.
Record of foreclosure and sale.
3765.
Effect of sale.
3766.
Computation of time.
3767.
Severability.
3768.
Deficiency judgment.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T11:40:23-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (No. 333-39171) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
333-59163, No. 333-59157, No. 333-21997, No. 33-86634, and No. 33-94872)
pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                          --------------------------------------

Palo Alto, California
March 10, 2000
### §1723e. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §483(a)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1240

Section, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title III, §313, as added Oct. 18, 1974, Pub. L. 93–449, §3(a), 88 Stat. 1364; amended July 2, 1975, Pub. L. 94–50, title II §§201–206, 89 Stat. 254, 255; Aug. 3, 1976, Pub. L. 94–375, §13(e)(1), 90 Stat. 1075; Oct. 12, 1977, Pub. L. 95–128, title IV, §407(a)–(d), 91 Stat. 1137, 1138; Oct. 8, 1980, Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §337(b), 94 Stat. 1655, related to the interim mortgage and security purchasing authority of the Association.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

For continued application of former sections 1720 and 1723e of this title to any purchase or commitment to purchase any mortgage made pursuant to those sections before Nov. 30, 1983, and the servicing and disposition of any such mortgage, see section 483(b) of Pub. L. 98–181, set out as a note under section 1720 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 93–449, §3(b), Oct. 18, 1974, 88 Stat. 1366, as amended by Pub. L. 94–50, title II, §207, July 2, 1975, 89 Stat. 256; Pub. L. 94–375, §13(d), Aug. 3, 1976, 90 Stat. 1075; Pub. L. 95–128, title IV, §407(e), Oct. 12, 1977, 91 Stat. 1138; Pub. L. 95–406, §3, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 880; Pub. L. 95–557, title III, §303, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2096; Pub. L. 96–71, §3, Sept. 28, 1979, 93 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 96–105, §3, Nov. 8, 1979, 93 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 96–153, title III, §303, Dec. 21, 1979, 93 Stat. 1112; Pub. L. 96–372, §4, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1364; Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §337(a), Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1655, which related to the effective date of former section 1723e of this title, was repealed by Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §483(a)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1240.

#### Emergency Mortgage Purchase Assistance; Transfer of Funds

Pub. L. 98–371, title I, July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1218, in part directed Secretary to transfer all assets acquired and liabilities incurred pursuant to this section to management and liquidating functions fund established pursuant to section 1721 of this title, and that on Oct. 1, 1984, each outstanding obligation issued by Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to subsec. (c) of this section, together with any promise to repay principal and unpaid interest which had accrued on each obligation, and any other term or condition specified by each such obligation, was canceled.
| **Reportable Segments, Geographic Information And Major Customers (Percentages Of Accounts Receivable From Customers) (Details) (Juniper Networks [Member])** | Oct. 01, 2011Rate |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
| Juniper Networks [Member]                                                                                                                                     |              |
| Percentage of accounts receivable from major customer                                                                                                         | 23.00%            |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Percentage of accounts receivable from major customer.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**plxs_PercentageOfAccountsReceivableFromMajorCustomer**Namespace Prefix:**plxs_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
# C_2007056EN.01003901.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/39

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 January 2007 — BA.LA. di Lanciotti Vittorio and Others v Commission

(Case T-163/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 56/72)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court of First Instance has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 190 of 12.8.2006.

1

---
§ 27.255 Recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) Except as provided in § 27.255(b), the covered facility must keep records of the activities as set out below for at least three years and make them available to the Department upon request. A covered facility must keep the following records: ( 1 ) *Training.* For training, the date and location of each session, time of day and duration of session, a description of the training, the name and qualifications of the instructor, a clear, legible list of attendees to include the attendee signature, at least one other unique identifier of each attendee receiving the training, and the results of any evaluation or testing;
( 2 ) *Drills and exercises.* For each drill or exercise, the date held, a description of the drill or exercise, a list of participants, a list of equipment (other than personal equipment) tested or employed in the exercise, the name(s) and qualifications of the exercise director, and any best practices or lessons learned, which may improve the Site Security Plan;
( 3 ) *Incidents and breaches of security.* Date and time of occurrence, location within the facility, a description of the incident or breach, the identity of the individual to whom it was reported, and a description of the response;
( 4 ) *Maintenance, calibration, and testing of security equipment.* The date and time, name and qualifications of the technician(s) doing the work, and the specific security equipment involved for each occurrence of maintenance, calibration, and testing;
( 5 ) *Security threats.* Date and time of occurrence, how the threat was communicated, who received or identified the threat, a description of the threat, to whom it was reported, and a description of the response;
( 6 ) *Audits.* For each audit of a covered facility's Site Security Plan (including each audit required under § 27.225(e)) or Security Vulnerability Assessment, a record of the audit, including the date of the audit, results of the audit, name(s) of the person(s) who conducted the audit, and a letter certified by the covered facility stating the date the audit was conducted; and
( 7 ) *Letters of Authorization and Approval.* All Letters of Authorization and Approval from the Department, and documentation identifying the results of audits and inspections conducted pursuant to § 27.250.
( b ) A covered facility must retain records of submitted Top-Screens, Security Vulnerability Assessments, Site Security Plans, and all related correspondence with the Department for at least six years and make them available to the Department upon request.
( c ) To the extent necessary for security purposes, the Department may request that a covered facility make available records kept pursuant to other Federal programs or regulations.
( d ) Records required by this section may be kept in electronic format. If kept in an electronic format, they must be protected against unauthorized access, deletion, destruction, amendment, and disclosure.
[72 FR 17729, Apr. 9, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 41892, Aug. 4, 2021]
# C_2006224EN.01004302.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/43

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2006 — Freiherr von Cramer-Klett and Rechtlerverband Pfronten v Commission

(Case T-136/04) (1)

1

(Council Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora - Commission Decision 2004/69/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region - Action for annulment - Inadmissible)

(2006/C 224/93)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Freiherr von Cramer-Klett (Aschau im Chiemgau, Germany) and Rechtlerverband Pfronten (Pfronten, Germany) (represented by: T. Schönfeld and L. Thum, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beek and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: T. Pynnä and A. Guimaraes-Purokowski, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/69/EC of 22 December 2003 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 14, p. 21).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible

| 2. | The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Commission.

| 3. | The Republic of Finland is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Republic of Finland is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190 of 24.7.2004.

1

---
Opinion issued April 19, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-01016-CV

———————————

JAMES E. PHILLIPS AND VERONICA JOHNSON, Appellants

V.

MALAK ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1061166

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, James E. Phillips and Veronica Johnson, have neither established 

indigence, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s 

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 

37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s 
2

fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did 

not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary 

dismissal).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.
### Deposits