alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

YANELKIS LEYVA MOREJON, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4465 

 ) 

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and ) 

LUIS ENRIQUE HERRERA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellees. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed August 30, 2017. 

Appeal from the Department of Revenue. 

Neil Morales of Law Offices of Neil Morales, 

P.A., Naples, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, 

for Appellee Department of Revenue. 

No appearance for Appellee Luis Enrique 

Herrera. 

CASANUEVA, Judge. 

Yanelkis Morejon, the mother, appeals a final administrative support order 

obligating Luis Herrera, the father, to pay $400 per month in child support for their two 
- 2 -

minor children.1 Ms. Morejon argues that she never received notice of the hearing and 

that the administrative law judge erred by determining the amount of child support 

based on an agreement rather than the statutory child support guidelines. Accordingly, 

she contends that the support order must be reversed. 

The Department of Revenue concedes that the record does not establish 

that Ms. Morejon received notice of the hearing. The Department further concedes that 

the support order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence and lacks the 

statutory findings required by section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2016). See § 61.30(1)(a) 

("The child support guideline amount as determined by this section presumptively 

establishes the amount the trier of fact shall order as child support in an initial 

proceeding for such support . . . ."); Ervin v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue, 152 So. 3d 1261, 

1264-65 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Finney v. Finney, 995 So. 2d 579, 581-82 (Fla. 1st DCA 

2008). 

Consistent with the Department's proper concession of error, we conclude 

that reversal is required. See Todd v. Guillaume-Todd, 972 So. 2d 1003, 1007 (Fla. 4th 

DCA 2008) (concluding reversal was required where the final judgment failed to include 

"any findings as to the net income of each party as a starting point for calculating child 

support or explaining how the calculation was performed"). We reverse the support 

order and remand this matter for further administrative proceedings after proper notice, 

with the assistance of an interpreter if necessary. 

 Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. 

KHOUZAM and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur. 

 1There is no appearance by the father.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Vital Images, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-26797, 333-39189, 333-39213,
333-30771, 333-69761, and 333-69765) of our report dated February 10, 1999,
except as to Note 10, for which the date is March 19, 1999, on our audits of the
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Vital Images, Inc. as
of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998 and
1997, the two months ended December 31, 1996, and the year ended October 31,
1996, which report is included in this 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                         /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                         --------------------------------


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 26, 1999
### Part E—Enforcement Powers
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.114 Tetanus Toxoid. Tetanus Toxoid shall be produced from a culture of *Clostridium tetani* which has been inactivated and is nontoxic. The toxoid may be either absorbed, precipitated, or purified and concentrated. Each serial of biological product containing *tetanus toxoid* fraction shall meet the applicable requirements in § 113.100 and shall be tested for purity, safety, and potency as prescribed in this section. A serial or subserial found unsatisfactory by any prescribed test shall not be released. ( a ) *Purity test.* Final container samples of completed product from each serial and subserial shall be tested for viable bacteria and fungi as provided in § 113.26.
( b ) *Safety test.* Bulk or final container samples of completed product from each serial shall be tested for safety as provided in § 113.33(b).
( c ) *Potency test.* Bulk or final container samples of completed product from each serial shall be tested for potency. A group of 10 guinea pigs consisting of an equal number of males and females weighing 450 to 550 grams shall each be injected subcutaneously with 0.4 of the largest dose recommended on the product labels. ( 1 ) Six weeks after injection, all surviving guinea pigs shall be bled and equal portions of serum, but not less than 0.5 ml from each, shall be pooled. For a valid test, the pool shall contain the serum from at least eight animals.
( 2 ) The antitoxin titer of the pooled serum shall be determined in antitoxin units (A.U.) per ml using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method acceptable to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
( 3 ) If the antitoxin titer of the serum pool is at least 2.0 A.U. per ml, the serial is satisfactory. If the antitoxin titer of the serum pool is less than 2.0 A.U. per ml, the serial may be retested by the following procedure: *Provided,* That, if the serial is not retested, it shall be declared unsatisfactory.
( 4 ) For serials in which the serum pool contains less than 2.0 A.U. per ml, the individual serum that constituted the pool may be tested by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. If at least 80 percent of the individual serums have an antitoxin titer of at least 2.0 A.U. per ml, the serial is satisfactory. If less than 80 percent of the individual serums have an antitoxin titer of at least 2.0 A.U. per ml, the serial may be retested in 10 guinea pigs using the procedure described in (c)(1) and (2) above. The antitoxin titer of the pooled serum from the guinea pigs used in the retest shall be averaged with the antitoxin level of the pooled serum from the initial test. If the average of the two pools is at least 2.0 A.U. per ml, the serial is satisfactory. If the average of the two pools is less than 2.0 A.U. per ml, the serial is unsatisfactory and shall not be retested further.
[39 FR 16862, May 10, 1974, as amended at 46 FR 23224, Apr. 24, 1981; 50 FR 24905, June 14, 1985. Redesignated at 55 FR 35562, Aug. 31, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 37827, Aug. 9, 1991; 56 FR 66785, Dec. 26, 1991]
Letter Agreement dated April 1, 2008



 Exhibit 10.8 
  

			
		
	

	  	 GPS Services
 Two Folsom Street
 San Franciso, CA 94105
  
 www.gapinc.com


 Dated as of April 1, 2008 
 FIRST ANNIVERSARY EXTENSION REQUEST AND FACILITY REDUCTION 
 HSBC Bank USA, National Association

 452 Fifth Avenue, 5th Floor 
 New York, NY 10018 
 Attention: Jeremy Bollington 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 We refer to the 3-Year Letter of Credit Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2005 (the “Agreement”), as amended May 18, 2007 (“Amendment No. 1”), between the undersigned and you. 
 Extension of Termination Date 
 Pursuant to Section 2.17 of the
Agreement, the Company, by written notice, can request to extend the Termination Date set forth in the Agreement (May 18, 2010) by one year by providing notice at least 45 days but not more than 60 days prior to each of the first and second
anniversaries of the date of Amendment No. 1. 
 The LC Issuer shall, not later than 30 days prior to such anniversary date, notify the Company in
writing as to whether it will consent to such extension. 
 We hereby request extension of the termination date of the 3-Year Letter of Credit Agreement to
May 18, 2011. 
 Reduction in Facility Amount 
 Further, pursuant to Section 2.09 of the Agreement, the Company hereby reduces the Facility Amount to $100,000,000.00, effective May 18, 2008. 

									
		 		 	 Very truly yours,
  
 THE GAP, INC.

				
	Acknowledged:	 		 	By	 	/s/ Jennifer Cho
		 		 		 		 	Vice President and Treasurer
	 HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 /s/ Thomas Foley
	 		 		 	
	 Name: Thomas Foley
 Title: Sr. Vice President
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  August 22, 2005 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                         
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                       | Marc N. Teal,
Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
21**
 
 
 **SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE REGISTRANT**
 
 
 (1) AIQ,
Inc., 100% owned by Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc., a Minnesota
corporation.
 
 (2) Red
Wing Business Systems, Inc., 100% owned by Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc., a
Minnesota corporation.
 
 (3)
Champion Business Systems, Inc., 100% owned by Wits Basin Precious Minerals
Inc., a Colorado corporation.
 
 (4)
Active Hawk Minerals LLC, 100% owned by Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc., and
Minnesota limited liability company.
 
 (5)
Gregory Gold Producers, Inc., 100% owned by Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc., a
Colorado corporation.
#### Stephen Farrelly, as Ancillary Receiver of the City Trust, Safe Deposit and Surety Company of Philadelphia, Respondent, *v.*Caroline A. Schaettler, as Executrix, etc., of Ferdinand Schaettler, Deceased, Appellant.

First Department,

February 7, 1908.

Practice — amendment .of complaint — costs.

After the reversal of a judgment against an executrix, as such, an amendment of the complaint so as to charge her personally, should he conditioned on the ' payment of costs to date of the amendment, except costs before trial.

Appeal by the defendant, Caroline A. Schaettlei'j as executrix, etc., from an order' of the Supreme Court, made at the Few York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Eew York on the 20th day of December, 1907, granting the plaintiff’s motion to amend the summons and complaint herein by striking.from the title of the action the words “as executrix of the last will and testament of Ferdinand Schaettler, deceased,” upon the payment of seventy-five dollars costs.

A judgment against the defendant as executrix was reversed upon an appeal to the Appellate Division and a néw trial ordered. (See. *Farrelly*v. Sohaettler, 121 App. Div. 678.)

*F. JR. JMJinrath,*for the appellant.-

*JFrederic J. Swift,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam :

The order should be modified so as to allow the defendant costs of the action to the date of the amendment, except costs before trial, as a condition for the allowance of the amendment applied, for, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.

Present — Patterson, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.

Order modified as directed in opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant. Settle order on notice.
§ 700.601 Definitions. ( a ) *Hopi reservation evictees.* Hopi reservation evictees are those members of the Navajo Tribe who were evicted from the Hopi Indian Reservation as a consequence of the decision in the case of *United States v. Kabinto* (456 F. 2d 1087) (1972).
( b ) *Head of household.* ( 1 ) A household is group of two or more persons who live together at a specific location, who form a unit of permanent and domestic character.
( 2 ) The head of household is the individual who speaks on behalf of the members of the household and who is determined by the Commission to represent the household.
( 3 ) In order to be eligible for benefits under this section, an individual must be a head of household as of the date of certification for benefits.
( 4 ) Those single individuals who actually maintain and support themselves as of the date of certification for benefits shall be considered a head of household.
( c ) *Hopi reservation.* For purposes of this subpart Hopi reservation shall mean the lands in Land Management District No. Six as defined in the September 28, 1962, Judgment in *Healing v. Jones* Civ. No. 579 pCT (d), Ariz., and shall not include the Hopi Partitioned Lands.
( d ) *Equivalent assistance from federal agencies.* Housing provided for Hopi reservation evictees shall be considered equivalent assistance if it meets the Commission's standards for a decent, safe and sanitary dwelling under § 700.55 of these rules.
### subpart 3—reconsideration
§ 115.176 Disciplinary sanctions for staff. ( a ) Staff shall be subject to disciplinary or adverse action up to and including removal from their position and the Federal service for substantiated allegations of sexual abuse or violating agency sexual abuse policies.
( b ) The agency shall review and approve policy and procedures regarding disciplinary or adverse action for staff and shall ensure that the policy and procedures specify disciplinary or adverse actions for staff, up to and including removal from their position and from the Federal service, when there is a substantiated allegation of sexual abuse, or when there has been a violation of agency sexual abuse rules, policies, or standards. Removal from their position and from the Federal service is the presumptive disciplinary sanction for staff who have engaged in or attempted or threatened to engage in sexual abuse, as defined under the definition of sexual abuse of a detainee by a staff member, contractor, or volunteer, paragraphs (1)-(4) and (7)-(8) of the definition of “sexual abuse of a detainee by a staff member, contractor, or volunteer” in § 115.6.
( c ) Each facility shall report all removals or resignations in lieu of removal for violations of agency or facility sexual abuse policies to appropriate law enforcement agencies, unless the activity was clearly not criminal.
( d ) Each agency shall make reasonable efforts to report removals or resignations in lieu of removal for violations of agency or facility sexual abuse policies to any relevant licensing bodies, to the extent known.
### §4122. Preemption of State and local laws

#### (a) In general

No State or political subdivision of a State may establish, continue in effect, or enforce any law or regulation that—

(1) restricts or inhibits the prepayment of any mortgage described in section 4119(1) of this title (or the voluntary termination of any insurance contract pursuant to section 1715t of this title) on eligible low income housing;

(2) restricts or inhibits an owner of such housing from receiving the authorized annual return provided under section 4104 of this title;

(3) is inconsistent with any provision of this subchapter, including any law, regulation, or other restriction that limits or impairs the ability of any owner of eligible low income housing to receive incentives authorized under this subchapter (including authorization to increase rental rates, transfer the housing, obtain secondary financing, or use the proceeds of any of such incentives); or

(4) in its applicability to low-income housing is limited only to eligible low-income housing for which the owner has prepaid the mortgage or terminated the insurance contract.

Any law, regulation, or restriction described under paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) shall be ineffective and any eligible low-income housing exempt from the law, regulation, or restriction, only to the extent that it violates the provisions of this subsection.

#### (b) Effect

This section shall not prevent the establishment, continuing in effect, or enforcement of any law or regulation of any State or political subdivision of a State not inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter, such as any law or regulation relating to building standards, zoning limitations, health, safety, or habitability standards for housing, rent control, or conversion of rental housing to condominium or cooperative ownership, to the extent such law or regulation is of general applicability to both housing receiving Federal assistance and nonassisted housing. This section shall not preempt, annul, or alter any contractual restrictions or obligations existing before November 28, 1990, that prevent or limit an owner of eligible low-income housing from prepaying the mortgage on the housing (or terminating the insurance contract on the housing).

(Pub. L. 100–242, title II, §232, as added Pub. L. 101–625, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4273; amended Pub. L. 102–550, title III, §311, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3765.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–550 substituted ", such as any law or regulation" for "and" after "subchapter".
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 19, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 19, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0305. SUSAN MAURO v. FRANK MAURO.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2016CV283328
| | Exhibit 13.1
| | ------------





Certification
by CEO and CFO pursuant to Section

1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002



The certification set
forth below is being submitted in connection with BBVA Banco Francés S.A.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.



Martín Ezequiel
Zarich, the Chief Executive Officer and Ernesto R. Gallardo Jimenez, the Chief Financial Officer of BBVA Banco Francés S.A.,
each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of BBVA Banco Francés S.A.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 10, 2019



| | /s/ Martín Ezequiel Zarich                                                               
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Martín Ezequiel
        Zarich
        
        Title: Chief Executive Officer     
| |                                                                                          
| |                                                                                          
| | /s/  Ernesto R. Gallardo Jimenez                                                         
| | Name: Ernesto R. Gallardo
        Jimenez
        
        Title: Chief Financial Officer
§ 158.602 Compensation system. ( a ) The Secretary or designee establishes and administers a compensation system based on: ( 1 ) The compensation strategy in § 158.601;
( 2 ) Information from strategic talent planning described in § 158.401(c);
( 3 ) Generally recognized compensation principles and practices; and
( 4 ) Strategic talent priorities.
( b ) The compensation system comprises: ( 1 ) The salary system described in § 158.610; and
( 2 ) Additional compensation described in § 158.603.
### §1441a–2. Authorization for State housing finance agencies and nonprofit entities to purchase mortgage-related assets

#### (a) Authorization

Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal or State law, a State housing finance authority or nonprofit entity may purchase mortgage-related assets from the Resolution Trust Corporation or from financial institutions with respect to which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is acting as a conservator or receiver (including assets associated with any trust business), and any contract for such purchase shall be effective in accordance with its terms without any further approval, assignment, or consent with respect to that contract.

#### (b) Investment requirement

Any State housing finance authority or nonprofit entity which purchases mortgage-related assets pursuant to subsection (a) shall invest any net income attributable to the ownership of those assets in financing, refinancing, or rehabilitating low- and moderate-income housing within the jurisdiction of the State housing finance authority or within the geographical area served by the nonprofit entity.

(Pub. L. 101–73, title XIII, §1302, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 548.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, and not as part of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 1441a–1 of this title apply to this section.
#### Colt Employees Federal Credit Union *v.*Adrien J. Lagassie et al.

*William J. St. John, Jr.,*in support of the petition.

*James M. Marinetti,*in opposition.

Submitted January 24

decided February 5, 1974

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Court of Common Pleas is denied.