alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.68 Will this uniform data set be required of all Indian tribe or tribal organizations contracting with the IHS under the Act?

No. The uniform data set, applicable to the services to be performed, will serve as the target for the Secretary and the Indian tribes or tribal organizations during individual negotiations on program data reporting requirements.
Exhibit 32.1 BILLMYPARENTS, INC. (formerly known as SOCIALWISE, INC.) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to Quarterly Report of BillMyParents, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael McCoy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  |                        
|Date:  December 21, 2011 |  | /s/ Michael McCoy      
|                         |  | Michael McCoy          
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2195-2196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode 
Island, New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2196]]

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 8, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, February 8, 2011, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. 
For more information, please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton 
Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 5, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-404 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### §4211. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–362, title X, §1001(e), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3291

Section, Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2571, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4899, related to Government accountability and public reports on processing of declarations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,554
<SECURITIES>                                    16,986
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                       842
<INVENTORY>                                        285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,900
<PP&E>                                          17,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           222
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,331
<SALES>                                         21,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,125
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   555
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,698)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.55)


</TABLE>
Attachment 13

AIM Results

Sanitized
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 29, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-51013

Summary Calendar

 

JAMES GREGORY LYNN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JANIE COCKRELL, in her official capacity;

TERRY R. HASSEL, Head Warden; JIMMY R. LAWSON,

Major; BENNY H. BOYKIN, Captain; JOE R. ALDERMAN,

Substitute Counselor,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-03-CV-207

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Gregory Lynn, Texas prisoner #636695, moves for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the district court’s

dismissal of his civil rights complaint, filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983, as frivolous and for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Lynn’s motion

is a challenge to the district court’s certification that his
No. 03-51013

-2-

appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d

197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). As an initial matter, Lynn has

abandoned his claim against Cockrell by failing to brief it

adequately. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.

1993) (arguments not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned). 

Lynn avers that Hassel, Lawson, Boykin, and Alderman filed

and prosecuted false disciplinary cases against him in

retaliation for his having filed a prior lawsuit against them. 

Because an inmate is not required to demonstrate a favorable

outcome of a disciplinary case if he is alleging a retaliatory

motive, the district court abused its discretion in determining

that the retaliation claims against Hassel, Lawson, Boykin, and

Alderman were barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). 

See Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1164-66 (5th Cir. 1995). Thus,

the district court erred in certifying that Lynn was not entitled

to proceed IFP on appeal. Therefore, Lynn’s motion to proceed

IFP on appeal is GRANTED. 

However, the dismissal of the retaliation claims against

Hassel, Lawson, Boykin, and Alderman is AFFIRMED on the basis

that Lynn failed to allege facts to support an arguable claim of

retaliation. See Hanchey v. Energas Co., 925 F.2d 96, 97 (5th

Cir. 1990); Woods, 60 F.3d at 1164-66. 

IFP GRANTED; AFFIRMED.
#### § 13.11 Referral of Complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the Reviewing Official will refer the matter to an ALJ by filing the Complaint and answer in accordance with § 13.26.
§ 3.3 Applicability. ( a ) *General requirement.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part prescribes the exclusive process for interested persons to submit a rulemaking petition on a matter within DHS's jurisdiction.
( b ) *Exceptions* — ( 1 ) *U.S. Coast Guard.* This part does not apply to any petition for rulemaking directed to the U.S. Coast Guard. Such petitions are governed by 33 CFR 1.05-20.
( 2 ) *Federal Emergency Management Agency.* This part does not apply to any petition for rulemaking directed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Such petitions are governed by 44 CFR 1.8.
[81 FR 47286, July 21, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 23500, Apr. 4, 2024]
#### § 83.3 Who does this part apply to?

This part applies only to indigenous entities that are not federally recognized Indian tribes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                       575
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,408
<PP&E>                                         768,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 817,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,429
<BONDS>                                        364,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                     407,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   817,606
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,226
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,657)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,888
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C 1350)





Each of the undersigned officers of RREEF Property Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i) | the accompanying special financial report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

|     |                                                                                                                                                     
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 28, 2013/s/ JAMES N. CARBONEJames N. CarboneChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: March 28, 2013/s/ JULIANNA S. INGERSOLLJulianna S. IngersollChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
### §2149a. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(16), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4680

Section, Pub. L. 92–181, title III, §3.29, formerly title VII, §7.5, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §416, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1646; renumbered §3.29, Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §408(e), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1001, related to reports by merged banks for cooperatives.

Section was classified to section 2279a–5 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 100–399.
#### MARSH v. TROTMAN

No. 42P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 578

u Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1990.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.95 What is BIA or IHS excess property?

BIA or IHS excess property means property under the jurisdiction of the BIA or IHS that is excess to the agency's needs and the discharge of its responsibilities.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-2
 
                          CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST
 
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                            AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
 
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             -----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
                                                               1998       1997       1996       1995       1994
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Available earnings:
  Net income (loss)........................................  $  36,458  $  27,630  $  14,941  $   8,212  $   2,359
  Add interest expense (1).................................     15,476     10,871     10,992     12,985     12,157
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Available earnings (loss) (2)..............................  $  51,934  $  38,501  $  25,933  $  21,197  $  14,516
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Combined fixed charges:
  Interest expense.........................................  $  15,476  $  10,871  $  10,992  $  12,985  $  12,157
  Capitalized interest.....................................      2,214        893        142         20         63
  Preferred dividends......................................      6,360        901        947      1,002
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Total fixed charges........................................  $  24,050  $  12,665  $  12,081  $  14,007  $  12,220
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges................       2.16       3.04       2.15       1.51       1.19
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
NOTES:
 
(1) Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing costs.
 
(2) Interest portion of rental expense is not calculated because annual rental
    expense for the Company is not significant.
 
                                      F-33
### §1701c–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 24, 1954, ch. 359, title I, §101, 68 Stat. 283, provided for promotion of economy, efficiency and fidelity in operations of Housing and Home Finance Agency by its Administrator, on and after June 24, 1954, under Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1947, eff. July 27, 1947, 12 F.R. 4981, 61 Stat. 954, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, through assignment and reassignment of functions, reorganizations, and reallocation and transfers of administrative expense funds and authority. Functions, powers, and duties of such agency, its head and other officers were transferred to and vested in the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development by Pub. L. 89–174, §5, Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 669, classified to section 3534 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
# C_2006191EN.01000101.xml

| 15.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 August 2006

(2006/C 191/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2718 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4608 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67435 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2005 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5807 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,44 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9980 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5759 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,118 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8773 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5354 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,62 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,566 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8645 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6692 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4338 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8935 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0143 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0111 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 228,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,7252 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1477 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2770 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 560,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,679 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,243 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1350 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,567 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2718

JPY

Japanese yen

148,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4608

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67435

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2005

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5807

ISK

Iceland króna

90,44

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9980

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5759

CZK

Czech koruna

28,118

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8773

RON

Romanian leu

3,5354

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,62

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,566

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8645

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6692

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4338

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8935

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0143

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0111

KRW

South Korean won

1 228,24

ZAR

South African rand

8,7252

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1477

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2770

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 560,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,679

PHP

Philippine peso

65,243

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1350

THB

Thai baht

47,567

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2007056EN.01002303.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/23

---

Action brought on 23 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-21/07)

(2007/C 56/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Hottiaux and D. Lawunmi, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 amending Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 amending Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that Directive.

1

| — | order Ireland to pay the costs of this Application. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay the costs of this Application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 11 August 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 35, p.28.

1

---
#### Paul L. Crowe, Appellant, v. Eugene F. Crowe, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to plaintiff to amend on payment of costs. Ho opinion.