alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 7.23 Emergency release of classified information. ( a ) The DHS Undersecretary for Management has delegated to certain DHS employees the authority to disclose classified information to an individual or individuals not otherwise eligible for access in emergency situations when there is an imminent threat to life or in defense of the homeland.
( b ) In exercising this authority, the delegees shall adhere to the following conditions: ( 1 ) Limit the amount of classified information disclosed to a minimum to achieve the intended purpose;
( 2 ) Limit the number of individuals who receive it to only those persons with a specific need-to-know;
( 3 ) Transmit the classified information through approved communication channels by the most secure and expeditious method possible, or by other means deemed necessary in exigent circumstances;
( 4 ) Provide instructions about what specific information is classified and how it should be safeguarded. Physical custody of classified information must remain with an authorized Federal Government entity, in all but the most extraordinary circumstances as determined by the delegated official;
( 5 ) Provide appropriate briefings to the recipients on their responsibilities not to disclose the information and obtain from the recipients a signed DHS Emergency Release of Classified Information Non-disclosure Form. In emergency situations requiring immediate verbal release of information, the signed nondisclosure agreement memorializing the briefing may be received after the emergency abates;
( 6 ) Within 72 hours of the disclosure of classified information, or the earliest opportunity that the emergency permits, but no later than 7 days after the release, the disclosing authority must notify the DHS Office of the Chief Security Officer, Administrative Security Division, and the originating agency of the information disclosed. A copy of the signed nondisclosure agreements should be forwarded with the notification, or as soon thereafter as practical.
( 7 ) Release of information pursuant to this authority does not constitute declassification of the information.
( 8 ) Authority to disclose classified information under the above conditions may not be further delegated.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign and analysis of a fast, two-mirror soft-x-ray microscopeDuring the past several years, a number of investigators have addressed the design, analysis, fabrication, and testing of spherical Schwarzschild microscopes for soft-x-ray applications using multilayer coatings. Some of these systems have demonstrated diffraction limited resolution for small numerical apertures. Rigorously aplanatic, two-aspherical mirror Head microscopes can provide near diffraction limited resolution for very large numerical apertures. The relationships between the numerical aperture, mirror radii and diameters, magnifications, and total system length for Schwarzschild microscope configurations are summarized. Also, an analysis of the characteristics of the Head-Schwarzschild surfaces will be reported. The numerical surface data predicted by the Head equations were fit by a variety of functions and analyzed by conventional optical design codes. Efforts have been made to determine whether current optical substrate and multilayer coating technologies will permit construction of a very fast Head microscope which can provide resolution approaching that of the wavelength of the incident radiation.Document ID19930011127Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsShealy, D. L.*(Alabama Univ. Birmingham, AL, United States)*Wang, C.*(Alabama Univ. Birmingham, AL, United States)*Jiang, W.*(Alabama Univ. Birmingham, AL, United States)*Jin, L.*(Alabama Univ. Birmingham, AL, United States)*Hoover, R. B.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 11, 1992Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-193035NAS 1.26:193035Meeting InformationMeeting: SPIE Conference 1741-05Location: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: July 19, 1992End Date: July 24, 1992Accession Number93N20316Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA ORDER H-08073-DDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930011127.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §2249. Administrative expenses

The Farm Credit Administration may, within the limits of funds available therefor, make necessary expenditures for personnel services and rent at the seat of Government and elsewhere; contract stenographic reporting services; purchase and exchange lawbooks, books of reference, periodicals, newspapers, expenses of attendance at meetings and conferences; purchase, operation, and maintenance at the seat of Government and elsewhere of motor-propelled passenger-carrying vehicles and other vehicles; printing and binding; and for such other facilities and services, including temporary employment by contract or otherwise, as it may from time to time find necessary for the proper administration of this chapter. The Farm Credit Administration may dispose of property so acquired and any amounts collected from the disposition of such property shall be deposited in the special fund provided for in section 2250(b) of this title and shall be available to the Administration in the same manner and for the same purposes as the funds collected under section 2250(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.14, formerly §5.15, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 620; Pub. L. 96–592, title V, §505, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3449; renumbered §5.14 and amended Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §201(4), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1690.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5.14 of Pub. L. 92–181 was renumbered section 5.13 and is classified to section 2248 of this title.

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–205 made technical amendments to the references to sections 2250(b) and 2250(a) of this title appearing in second sentence to reflect the renumbering of the corresponding section of the original act.

1980—Pub. L. 96–592 inserted provisions relating to disposal of property and deposit of amounts from such disposal.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–205 effective thirty days after Dec. 23, 1985, see section 401 of Pub. L. 99–205, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5

<S>                                <C>             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS          12-MOS         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1996     MAR-31-1997    MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     APR-01-1995     APR-01-1996    APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1996     MAR-31-1997    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                             185,889         1,346,713      2,134,662
<SECURITIES>                       0               0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                      0               0              114,661
<ALLOWANCES>                       0               0              0
<INVENTORY>                        0               0              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   246,567         1,518,634      2,357,405
<PP&E>                             76,233          153,356        139,136
<DEPRECIATION>                     19,556          48,461         91,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     6,232,536       4,004,966      7,683,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              4,081,606       3,456,878      2,786,447
<BONDS>                            0               0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0               0              0
<PREFERRED>                        1,524           1,525          1
<COMMON>                           28,437          31,258         26,533
<OTHER-SE>                         2,120,969       515,305        4,870,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       0               0              0
<SALES>                            0               0              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   0               0              0
<CGS>                              0               0              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2,515,554       3,563,568      4,282,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   365,079         360,793        514,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0               0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 241,856         129,039        125,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (3,380,633)     (4,064,885)    (5,403,368)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0               0              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (3,380,633)     (4,064,885)    (5,403,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                     (1,901,097)     0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0               0              0
<CHANGES>                          0               0              0
<NET-INCOME>                       (5,281,730)     (4,074,885)    (6,802,054)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (0.21)          (0.14)         (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0               0              0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1251

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national 
    cemetery for veterans in the Miami, Florida, metropolitan area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 1999

 Mr. Graham (for himself and Mr. Mack) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national 
    cemetery for veterans in the Miami, Florida, metropolitan area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL CEMETERY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish, 
in accordance with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code, a 
national cemetery in the Miami, Florida, metropolitan area to serve the 
needs of veterans and their families.
    (b) Report.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that sets 
forth a schedule for the establishment of the national cemetery under 
subsection (a) and an estimate of the costs associated with such 
establishment.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.21 When can a proposal be declined?

As explained in §§ 900.16 and 900.17, a proposal can only be declined within 90 days after the Secretary receives the proposal, unless that period is extended with the voluntary and express written consent of the Indian tribe or tribal organization.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Mogesner NOEL

Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202200018 

_________________________

Decided: 28 July 2022

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Stephen F. Keane

Sentence adjudged 12 October 2021 by a special court-martial convened 

at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction 

to E-1, confinement for 7 months,1 forfeiture of $1,190 pay per month 

for 7 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: 

Major Brian L. Farrell, USMC

 

1 The convening authority suspended one month of forfeitures. Appellant was credited with 209 days of pre-trial confinement. 
United States v. Noel, NMCCA No. 202200018

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.2

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

S. TAYLOR JOHNSTON

Interim Clerk of Court

 

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 121

Affirming the Congress’ opposition to all forms of racism and bigotry.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1999

Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Affirming the Congress’ opposition to all forms of racism

and bigotry.

Whereas the United States of America has been enriched and

strengthened by the diversity and mutual respect of its

people;

Whereas the injustices and inequities of the past continue to

demand our forceful commitment, both as individuals and

as an institution, to equal justice under law and full opportunity for every American;

Whereas a racist attack upon any group of Americans is an

affront to every one who cherishes the promise of America and the values that sustain our democracy; and

Whereas every Member of Congress has a responsibility to

foster the best traditions and highest values of this nation: Now, therefore, be it
2

HRES 121 IH

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) insists that no individual’s rights are nego3 tiable or open to compromise; and

4 (2) reaffirms the determination of all its Mem5 bers to oppose any individuals or organizations

6 which seek to divide Americans on the grounds of

7 race, religion, or ethnic origin; and

8 (3) denounces all those who practice or promote

9 racism, anti-Semitism, ethnic prejudice, or religious

10 intolerance; and

11 (4) calls upon all Americans of good will to re12 ject the forces of hatred and bigotry wherever and

13 in whatever form they may be found.

Æ
§ 17.310 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment.* A recipient to which §§ 17.300 through 17.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and admission of students. A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 17.110(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 17.110(b).
( b ) *Recruitment at certain institutions.* A recipient to which §§ 17.300 through 17.310 apply shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at educational institutions, schools, or entities that admit as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 17.300 through 17.310.
# C_2007042EN.01004602.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/46

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 16 January 2007 — Vienne and Others v Parliament

(Case F-115/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Obligation on the administration to provide assistance - Refusal - Transfer of pension rights acquired in Belgium)

(2007/C 42/80)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Philippe Vienne (Bascharage, Luxembourg) and Others (represented by: G. Bouneou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: initially, M. Mustapha-Pacha and A. Bencomo-Weber and, subsequently, J. De Wachter, M. Mustapha-Pacha and K. Zejdova, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the Parliament's decision rejecting the requests for assistance submitted by the applicants in connection with the transfer of their pension rights acquired in Belgium and, secondly, an application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 28.1.2006, p. 24 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-427/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
# C_2007056EN.01004001.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/40

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 February 2007 — Rossi Ferreras v Commission

(Case F-42/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Appraisal - Career development report - 2003 appraisal procedure - Action for annulment - Action for damages)

(2007/C 56/74)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Francisco Rossi Ferreras (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the applicant's Career Development Report under the 2003 appraisal procedure and, secondly, an application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 3.9.2005, p. 45 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-222/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins Search 
                      -  National Transportation Safety Board Recommendations 
                      -  Recently Published Rulemakings Search 

## Contact Us

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-4433****Fax:**202-366-3666**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# PHMSA Standards and Rulemaking

PHMSA's Offices of Pipeline and Hazmat Safety Standards & Rulemaking utilize the process of rulemaking to propose and adopt changes to regulations. The process of rulemaking can include: proposing and finalizing rules, the division posts notices, advisory bulletins, special permits and state waivers, interpretations, and NTSB recommendations. Additionally, the general public may participate in the rulemaking process by filing written comments on any rulemaking document that asks for comments, participate in a public meeting, or file a petition for rulemaking that asks us to add, amend, or delete a regulation. This section provides information and links to recently published notices of proposed rulemaking, final rules, and public meetings.
#### § 100.144 Office building for State, local, or district party committees or organizations.

A payment, distribution, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value, made by, or on behalf of, a State, local, or district party committee or organization for the purchase or construction of an office building in accordance with 11 CFR 300.35 is not an expenditure.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,830
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,897
<INVENTORY>                                     45,602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         816,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,731,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,081,689
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           580
<OTHER-SE>                                     428,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,731,003
<SALES>                                         28,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,488
<CGS>                                           20,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,486
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,521
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,965
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,965
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
# C_2007082EN.01003801.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/38

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 January 2007 — Theofilopoulos v Commission

(Case T-91/06) (1)

1

(Action for compensation - Application for return of letters of guarantee - Court of First Instance not having jurisdiction - Inadmissibility of action - Action clearly devoid of legal foundation)

(2007/C 82/84)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Nikolaos Theofilopoulos (Athens, Greece) (represented by P. Miliarakis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by L. Ström van Lier and I. Chatzigiannis, agents)

Defendant:

Subject-matter

Action for compensation and application seeking the return of letters of guarantee.

Operative part

| 1) | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The action is dismissed.

| 2) | Mr Nikolaos Theofilopoulos is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Mr Nikolaos Theofilopoulos is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190 of 12.8.2006.

1

---