alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{N0112635  }  
Exhibit 99.7 
DLH HOLDINGS CORP.  
NOMINEE HOLDER CERTIFICATION  
        The undersigned, a broker, custodian bank, trustee, depositary or other nominee holder of non-transferable 
rights (the "Rights") to purchase shares of common stock ("Common Stock") of DLH Holdings Corp. ("DLH") 
pursuant to the rights offering described and provided for in the prospectus dated _________, 2016 (the 
"Prospectus"), hereby certifies to DLH and Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as subscription agent 
for the rights offering, that (1) the undersigned has exercised, on behalf of the beneficial owners thereof (which may 
include the undersigned), the number of Rights specified below pursuant to the basic subscription right (as defined 
in the Prospectus), and on behalf of beneficial owners of Rights who have subscribed for the purchase of additional 
shares of Common Stock pursuant to the over-subscription right (as defined in the Prospectus), the number of shares 
specified below pursuant to the over-subscription privilege, listing separately below each such exercised basic 
subscription right and the corresponding over-subscription privilege (without identifying any such beneficial owner), 
and (2) to the extent a beneficial owner has elected to subscribe for shares pursuant to the over-subscription 
privilege, each such beneficial owner's basic subscription right has been exercised in full:  
Number of Shares of Common Stock 
Owned on the Record Date    
Rights Exercised Pursuant to 
Basic Subscription Right    
Number of Shares Subscribed For 
Pursuant to Over-Subscription Right  
1.    
 
      
 
      
 
2.    
 
      
 
      
 
3.    
 
      
 
      
 
4.    
 
      
 
      
 
5.    
 
      
 
      
 
6.    
 
      
 
      
 
7.    
 
      
 
      
 
8.    
 
      
 
      
 
9.    
 
      
 
      
 
 
Provide the following information if applicable:  
      
 
Depository Trust Company ("DTC") 
Participant Number 
    
[NAME OF NOMINEE]  
          
By:      
 
    
    Name:     
    Title:
 {N0112635  }  
DTC Basic Subscription Confirmation Number(s):
### §3402. Access to financial records by Government authorities prohibited; exceptions

Except as provided by section 3403(c) or (d), 3413, or 3414 of this title, no Government authority may have access to or obtain copies of, or the information contained in the financial records of any customer from a financial institution unless the financial records are reasonably described and—

(1) such customer has authorized such disclosure in accordance with section 3404 of this title;

(2) such financial records are disclosed in response to an administrative subpena or summons which meets the requirements of section 3405 of this title;

(3) such financial records are disclosed in response to a search warrant which meets the requirements of section 3406 of this title;

(4) such financial records are disclosed in response to a judicial subpena which meets the requirements of section 3407 of this title; or

(5) such financial records are disclosed in response to a formal written request which meets the requirements of section 3408 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–630, title XI, §1102, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3697.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of 120 days after Nov. 10, 1978, see section 2101 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 375b of this title.
# C_2006326EN.01001002.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — K. Tas-Hagen, R.A. Tas v Raadskamer WUBO van de Pensioen- en Uitkeringsraad

(Case C-192/05) (1)

1

(Benefit awarded to civilian war victims by a Member State - Condition of residence in the territory of that State at the time when the application for the benefit is submitted - Article 18(1) EC)

(2006/C 326/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: K. Tas-Hagen, R.A. Tas

Applicants:

Defendant: Raadskamer WUBO van de Pensioen- en Uitkeringsraad

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Centrale Raad van Beroep — Grant of a benefit by a Member State to civilian war victims — Benefit reserved for nationals of the Member State in question who are resident in that Member State at the time when the application is submitted — Whether compatible with Article 18 EC

Operative part of the judgment

Article 18(1) EC must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which it refuses to grant to one of its nationals a benefit for civilian war victims solely on the ground that, at the time at which the application was submitted, the person concerned was resident, not in the territory of that Member State, but in the territory of another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 23. 7. 2005.

1

---
### §833. Art. 33. Disposition guidance

The President shall direct the Secretary of Defense to issue, in consultation with the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, non-binding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under sections 830 and 834 of this title (articles 30 and 34). Such guidance shall take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Government with respect to disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 49; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVI, §5204, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2906.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 833 | 50:604. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 33), 64 Stat. 119. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "When a person is held for trial by general court-martial the commanding officer shall, within eight days after the accused is ordered into arrest or confinement, if practicable, forward the charges, together with the investigation and allied papers, to the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction. If that is not practicable, he shall report in writing to that officer the reasons for delay."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Letter of Resignation of Louis Blumberg



 Exhibit 10.2 
 June 5, 2008 
 Board of Directors 
 Cambridge Heart, Inc. 
 100 Ames Pond Road 
 Tewksbury,
Massachusetts 01876 
 Members of the Board: 
 This letter shall
serve as submission of my resignation from the Board of Directors of Cambridge Heart, Inc. effective immediately. While my tenure has been short, my few meetings with the Board have provided me with substantial insight into the Board’s
strategic objectives and contemplated direction for Cambridge Heart as to which I do not agree and, as such, I do not wish to remain a member of the Board of Directors going forward. 
 Very truly yours, 
 /s/ Louis Blumberg 
 Louis Blumberg
| Redirecting to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service
The Financial Management Service (FMS) and the Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD) have consolidated into the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. You will now be redirected to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service Web site. If you are not redirected in 8 seconds, you can continue to this site by visiting http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# C_2007095EN.01003501.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/35

---

Order of the President of the Court of 1 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-71/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 95/68)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.3.2006.

1

---
-  Home 

# Hazardous Materials Special Permit Standard Operating Procedures

Special Permits Standard Operating Procedures Version 1.0.pdf (1.78 MB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
§ 581.1 What is the scope of this part? ( a ) This part governs motion practice under: ( 1 ) Part 582 of this subchapter relating to appeals of disapprovals of gaming ordinances, resolutions, or amendments;
( 2 ) Part 583 of this subchapter relating to appeals of the approval or disapproval of management contracts or amendments to a management contract;
( 3 ) Part 584 of this subchapter relating to appeals before a presiding official of notices of violation, orders of temporary closure, proposed civil fine assessments, the Chair's decisions to void or modify management contracts, the Commission's proposals to remove certificates of self-regulation, the Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission's minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees and late fee assessments; and
( 4 ) Part 585 of this subchapter relating to appeals to the Commission on written submissions of notices of violation, orders of temporary closure, proposed civil fine assessments, the Chair's decisions to void or modify management contracts, the Commission's proposals to remove certificates of self-regulation, the Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission's minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees and late fee assessments.
( b ) This part also governs motion practice in hearings under § 535.3 of this subchapter to review the Chair's decision to void or modify a management contract.
[77 FR 58945, Sept. 25, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 21062, Apr. 9, 2013]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-1
                                       
                          CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                 -----------------------
                                            1997           1996           1995            1994           1993
                                           -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
<S>                                       <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Available earnings:                                              
   Net income (loss)                       $27,630        $14,941        $ 8,212        $ 2,359        ($4,930)
   Add interest expense (1)                 10,871         10,992         12,985         12,157          4,111
                                           -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
Available earnings (loss) (2)              $38,501        $25,933        $21,197        $14,516        ($  819)
                                           -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
                                           -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
Fixed Charges:                                    
   Interest expense                        $10,871        $10,992        $12,985        $12,157         $4,111
   Capitalized interest                        893            142             20             63            470
                                           -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
Total Fixed Charges                        $11,764        $11,134        $13,005        $12,220         $4,581
                                           -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
                                           -------        -------        -------        -------        -------

Ratio of earnings to Fixed Charges (3)        3.27           2.33           1.63           1.19
                                           -------        -------        -------        -------        
                                           -------        -------        -------        -------        
</TABLE>

-----------------------------
NOTES:
(1)  Interest expense includes amortization of debt expense.
(2)  Interest portion of rental expense is not calculated because annual rental
     expense for the Company is not  significant.  
(3)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 1993
     was less than one to one.  The approximate dollar amount necessary to cover
     the deficiency in that period was $5,400.
§ 158.303 Talent management principles. ( a ) *Merit system principles.* CTMS is designed and the Secretary or designee, with assistance from the CTMB, administers CTMS based on the principles of merit and fairness embodied in the merit system principles in 5 U.S.C. 2301(b).
( b ) *Prohibited personnel practices.* Any employee of the Department who has the authority to take, direct others to take, recommend, or approve any talent management action under this part must comply with 5 U.S.C. 2302(b) regarding talent management actions under this part.
( c ) *Equal employment opportunity principles.* CTMS is designed and the Secretary or designee, with assistance from the CTMB, administers CTMS and manages the DHS-CS in accordance with applicable anti-discrimination laws and policies. Thus, talent management actions under this part that materially affect a term or condition of employment must be free from discrimination.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.122 What does an Indian tribe or tribal organization do if it wants to secure a construction contract? ( a ) The Act establishes a special process for review and negotiation of proposals for construction contracts which is different than that for other self-determination contract proposals. The Indian tribe or tribal organization should notify the Secretary of its intent to contract. After notification, the Indian tribe or tribal organization should prepare its contract proposal in accordance with the sections of this subpart. While developing its construction contract proposal, the Indian tribe or tribal organization can request technical assistance from the Secretary. Not later than 30 days after receiving a request from an Indian tribe or tribal organization, the Secretary shall provide to the Indian tribe or tribal organization all information available about the construction project, including construction drawings, maps, engineering reports, design reports, plans of requirements, cost estimates, environmental assessments, or environmental impact reports, and archaeological reports. The responsibility of the Secretary to furnish this information shall be a continuing one.
( b ) At the request of the Indian tribe or tribal organization and before finalizing its construction contract proposal, the Secretary shall provide for a precontract negotiation phase during the development of a contract proposal. Within 30 days the Secretary shall acknowledge receipt of the proposal and, if requested by the Indian tribe or tribal organization, shall confer with the Indian tribe or tribal organization to develop a negotiation schedule. The negotiation phase shall include, at a minimum: ( 1 ) The provision of technical assistance under section 103 of the Act and paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) A joint scoping session between the Secretary and the Indian tribe or tribal organization to review all plans, specifications, engineering reports, cost estimates, and other information available to the parties, for the purpose of identifying all areas of agreement and disagreement;
( 3 ) An opportunity for the Secretary to revise plans, designs, or cost estimates of the Secretary in response to concerns raised, or information provided by, the Indian tribe or tribal organization;
( 4 ) A negotiation session during which the Secretary and the Indian tribe or tribal organization shall seek to develop a mutually agreeable contract proposal; and
( 5 ) Upon the request of the Indian tribe or tribal organization, the use of alternative dispute resolution to resolve remaining areas of disagreement under the dispute resolution provisions under subchapter IV of chapter 5 of the United States Code.
### §2279g. Transactions to accomplish mergers exempt from certain State taxes

No State or political subdivision thereof may treat the merger or consolidation of two or more institutions of the Farm Credit System under this subchapter or title IV of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 as resulting in a change of ownership of any property owned by any of such merging or consolidating institutions, for purposes of any law of such State or political subdivision providing for reassessment of property on the occurrence of a change of ownership or imposing a tax on the ownership or transfer of property.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title VII, §7.14, as added Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §408(u), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1003.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Agricultural Credit Act of 1987, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 100–233, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1568. Title IV of that Act amended this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code see Short Title of 1988 Amendment note set out under section 2001 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective as if enacted immediately after enactment of Pub. L. 100–233, which was approved Jan. 6, 1988, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 100–399, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 2002 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1027 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1027

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the 
        Deschutes Resources Conservancy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deschutes Resources Conservancy 
Reauthorization Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PARTICIPATION OF BUREAU OF RECLAMATION IN 
              DESCHUTES RESOURCES CONSERVANCY.

    Section 301 of the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 
(division B of Public Law 104-208; 110 Stat. 3009-534) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``, and up to a total amount of 
        $2,000,000 during each of fiscal years 2002 through 2006''; and
            (2) in subsection (h), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal 
        years 2002 through 2006''.

            Passed the Senate July 1, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1027

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the 
        Deschutes Resources Conservancy, and for other purposes.
```
#### § 1000.436 How may a Tribe/Consortium seek reconsideration of the Secretary's decision involving a self-governance compact?

A Tribe/Consortium may request reconsideration of the Secretary's decision involving a self-governance compact by sending a written request for reconsideration to the Secretary within 30 days of receipt of the decision. A copy of this request must also be sent to the Director of the Office of Self-Governance.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1532

CHARLES DAVIS BURRELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHFOOD, INCORPORATED; RICHFOOD HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-97-948) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Davis Burrell, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Kyle Epps, Charles Randolph Sullivan, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Davis Burrell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination and 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burrell v. Richfood, Inc. , No. CA-97-948 (E.D. Va. Mar. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1.7 Request for correction or amendment to record. ( a ) Any individual who has reviewed a record pertaining to him or her that was furnished under this part, may request the Commission to correct or amend all or any part of that record.
( b ) Each individual requesting a correction or amendment shall send the request to the Commission through the person who furnished the record.
( c ) Each request for a correction or amendment of a record shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the individual requesting the correction or amendment;
( 2 ) The name of the system of records in which the record sought to be amended is maintained;
( 3 ) The location of the system of records from which the individual record was obtained;
( 4 ) A copy of the record sought to be amended or corrected or a sufficiently detailed description of that record;
( 5 ) A statement of the material in the record that the individual desires to correct or amend;
( 6 ) A statement of the basis for the requested correction or amendment including any material that the individual can furnish to substantiate the reasons for the correction or amendment sought.