alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1043462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   140813
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1184768
<PP&E>                                        17812334
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3186278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                16313004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           708749
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    15472255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  16313004
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2108760
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   306336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                533049
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1269375
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1269375
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1269375
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    25.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    25.43
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  KeySpan  Corporation  (the
"Corporation")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Gerald Luterman,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Corporation.








                                            By:    /s/Gerald Luterman
                                            -------------------------
                                            Name:  Gerald Luterman
                                            Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                            Date:  November 7, 2002
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**Certification by the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of JD.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2018, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto (the “Report”), I, Richard Qiangdong Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | June 29, 2018             |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                      |
| By:    | /s/ Richard Qiangdong Liu |   |
|   | Name:                     | Richard Qiangdong Liu |
|   | Title:                    | Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                           |  |  |

 

----
# C_2007082EN.01004801.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/48

---

Appeal brought on 14 February 2007 by Neophytos Neophytou against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 13 December 2006 in Case F-22/05, Neophytou/Commission

(Case T-43/07 P)

(2007/C 82/101)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Neophytos Neophytou (Itzig, Luxembourg) (represented by S. A. Pappas, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Cancel the appealed decision and, subsequently, the contested decision of the appointing authority; |
| --- | --- |

—

Cancel the appealed decision and, subsequently, the contested decision of the appointing authority;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of this appeal, the appellant is seeking to set aside the Civil Service Tribunal's conclusions in Case F-22/05 finding that, on one hand, the appellant's complaints made at the hearing were inadmissible and, on the other hand, that there was no infringement of the principle of non-discrimination.

In support of his first plea, the appellant contends that his argument concerning the composition of the selection board should have been admissible since it was based on new matters of fact which only came to light during the oral hearing according to the appellant. The latter claims, moreover, that the illegal constitution of an organ is a question of competence and thereby should have been examined ex officio. Accordingly, the appellant submits he should not have been bared from raising this new matter.

Also, the appellant argues that this complaint is directly connected to his second plea alleging infringement of the principle of non-discrimination on the grounds of unlawful composition of the selection board. On that basis, the appellant claims the Civil Service Tribunal did not properly implement the abovementioned principle, or at least failed to provide adequate reasoning for the particular features of the competition at stake; while it misunderstood his pleas and failed to address a number of them.

---
# C_2006326EN.01002702.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/27

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany) lodged on 16 October 2006 — Rüdiger Jager v Amt für Landwirtschaft Bützow

(Case C-420/06)

(2006/C 326/55)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rüdiger Jager

Applicant:

Defendant: Amt für Landwirtschaft Bützow

Defendant:

Question referred

Can Article 2(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (1) be construed as meaning that a provision imposing a more favourable penalty (concerning livestock aid) is to be applied retroactively even if that provision in principle only applies for a period of time during which livestock aid in the Member State concerned is no longer granted as a direct payment has been introduced?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1.

1

---
§ 158.1001 Advisory appointments and advisory appointees. ( a ) An advisory appointment is an appointment to a qualified position that: ( 1 ) The Secretary determines is of a policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character or involves a close and confidential working relationship with the Secretary or other key appointed officials;
( 2 ) Does not have a salary set by statute; and
( 3 ) Is not required to be filled by an appointment by the President.
( b ) An advisory appointment to a qualified position is treated as a Schedule C position under 5 CFR 213.3301 except regarding appointment and compensation. Talent management for a DHS-CS advisory appointee is in accordance with the provisions of 5 CFR applicable to Schedule C appointees, except that appointment and compensation for a DHS-CS advisory appointee is governed by this part.
( c ) Employment restrictions such as those concerning the criminal conflict of interest statutes, standards of ethical conduct, partisan political activity, and contained in laws such as Executive Orders, government-wide ethics regulations and the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 7321 *et seq.*), apply to a DHS-CS advisory appointee as if the employee were a Schedule C appointee.
( d ) The Department tracks and coordinates advisory appointments with the Executive Office of the President and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), as appropriate.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50266

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GASPAR SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-1349-2

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gaspar Salazar has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Salazar has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50266 Document: 00513804682 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-50266

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50266 Document: 00513804682 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
# C_2007110EN.01000501.xml

| 16.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/5

---

New national side of euro circulation coins

(2007/C 110/06)

Image

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing all parties required to handle coins in the course of their work and the public at large. In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the national side.

1

2

Issuing State: Portugal

Subject of commemoration: Portuguese Presidency of the Council of the European Union.

Factual description of the design: The inner part of the coin shows a cork oak (Quercus Suber). Under the branches, on the left hand side, the Portuguese coat of arms; on the right hand side, the word ‘POR TU GAL ’written on three lines. The legend ‘2007 PRESIDÊNCIA DO CONSELHO DA UE ’is inscribed in a semi-circle along the bottom of the inner part, with the artist signature (I Vilar) on the left and the mintmark (INCM) near the Coat of Arms. The outer ring of the coin depicts the twelve stars of the European flag.

Quercus Suber

Issuing volume: 2 million coins

Approximate issuing date: July 2007

Edge lettering: five coats of arms and seven castles equally spaced.

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for a reference to all national sides that were issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p. 38).

2

---
### §462a–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–597, §2(d), Sept. 21, 1966, 80 Stat. 824

Section, act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §19 (par.), as added Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title III, §324(d), 49 Stat. 715; amended Apr. 13, 1943, ch. 62, §2, 57 Stat. 65, prescribed maintenance of same bank reserves against deposits by United States as were required against other deposits.
#### KING v. CAPE FEAR MEM. HOSP.

No. 569P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 338

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1990.
§ 175.235 How does BIA include changes in purchased power costs in electric power rates? When our cost of purchased power changes: ( a ) We determine the effect of the change;
( b ) We adjust the purchased power component of your bill accordingly;
( c ) We add the purchased power adjustment to the existing electric power rate and put it into effect immediately;
( d ) The purchased power adjustment remains in effect until we determine future adjustments are necessary;
( e ) We must publish in the local newspaper and post at our office a notice of the purchase power adjustment and the basis for the adjustment; and
( f ) Our decision to make a purchased power adjustment must be final.
1 Gross, Ryan

From: Gross, Ryan Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:06 AM To: 'Morgan, Don' Subject: RE: Concurrence on EPA permit for NSF Ice Pier

Don,

Thanks for our response. I’ll amend the record to the file as you requested. See below.

On February 20, 2013, I spoke with Don Morgan (703-358-2444, don_morgan@fws.gov ) of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Program, Division of Consultation. Mr. Morgan confirmed that Jonathan Amson (EPA) had contacted his office requesting concur rence with EPA’s finding of no effect on December 1, 2010. At the time, Mr. Morgan assigned this request to a member of his office, who has since retired. The request was closed on December 10, 2010. To his recollection, Mr. Morgan said that his office agreed that there would be no effect to U.S. Fish and Wildlife listed species.

Ryan Gross, P.E.
Environmental Engineer

US Environmental Protection Agency ph. 202

‐ 566

‐ 1810

From: Morgan, Don [ mailto:don_morgan@fws.gov ]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 6:10 AM
To: Gross, Ryan
Cc: Rick Sayers; Patrice Ashfield Subject: Re: Concurrence on EPA permit for NSF Ice Pier

Mr Gross,

Although I have been unable to confir m the details of the discussion between Mr. Amson of your staff and Mr. Fay of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, I would be more comfortable stating that: " his office agreed that there would be no effect to U.S. Fish and Wildlife listed species."

Please let me know if you have nay questions.

Don

___________________________ Don R. Morgan Acting Chief, Division of Restoration and Recovery Ecological Services Program 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Room 434B Arlington, VA 22203 Phone (703) 358-2444 Fax (703) 358-17352 On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Gross, Ryan < Gross.Ryan@epa.gov > wrote:

Mr. Morgan,

Good morning. This is Ryan Gross from USEPA. I contacted you a few months ago regarding the permit renewal for the Ocean Disposal of National Science Foundati on’s Ice Pier in Antarctica. I need to make a record of our conversation for the file, so I will describe it be low. If you agree with this account, I would appreciate it if you respond back to this email saying so.

On February 20, 2013, I spoke with Don Morgan (703-358-2444, don_morgan@fws.gov ) of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Program, Division of Consultation. Mr. Morgan confirmed that Jonathan Amson (EPA) had contacted his office requesting concur rence with EPA’s finding of no effect on December 1, 2010. At the time, Mr. Morgan assigned this request to a member of his office, who has since retired. The request was closed on December 10, 2010. To his recollection, Mr. Morgan said that his office agreed that there
would be no effect.

Please feel free to make edits or give me a call if you want to discuss the matter. Again, thanks for your help.

V/R,

Ryan Gross, P.E.

Environmental Engineer US Environmental Protection Agency ph. 202-566-1810
#### § 110.7 [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John West, Chief Executive Officer of Solexa, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Solexa, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005
  /s/  John West
#### § 700.529 Negotiations for employment.

An employee shall inform the supervisor and seek the advice of the Designated Agency Ethics Official if he or she wishes to negotiate for future non-Federal employment with persons or organizations having business with the Commission if the employee is involved in making recommendations or decisions affecting those persons or organizations.
# C_2007033EN.01000401.xml

| 15.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 February 2007

(2007/C 33/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3082 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 158,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4533 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1410 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6268 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,19 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0890 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5791 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,268 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,52 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6967 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9149 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3866 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,358 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8295 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6734 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5265 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2213 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8923 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0106 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 227,68 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4545 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1484 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3570 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 862,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5767 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,284 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4030 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,572 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3082

JPY

Japanese yen

158,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4533

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66930

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1410

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6268

ISK

Iceland króna

88,19

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0890

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5791

CZK

Czech koruna

28,268

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,52

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6967

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9149

RON

Romanian leu

3,3866

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,358

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8295

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6734

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5265

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2213

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8923

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0106

KRW

South Korean won

1 227,68

ZAR

South African rand

9,4545

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1484

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3570

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 862,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5767

PHP

Philippine peso

63,284

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4030

THB

Thai baht

43,572

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---