54788 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 176 / Friday, September 11, 2015 / Notices 

1PM2.5 refers to particulate matter less than or 

equal to 2.5 microns in diameter. 

Total estimated burden: 17 hours (per 

year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 

1320.3(b). 

Total estimated cost: $1,730 (per 

year), including no annualized capital/ 

startup and/or operation & maintenance 

costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is an 

increase in the respondent burden from 

the most recently approved ICR. This 

increase is not due to any program 

changes. EPA revised the burden 

calculations to assume that all 

respondents incur a rule familiarization 

burden annually. Previously, EPA 

assumed that only new sources would 

incur this burden. This change resulted 

in the burden increase in this ICR. 

Courtney Kerwin, 

Acting-Director, Collection Strategies 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22902 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0450; FRL–9933–91– 

Region 8] 

Adequacy Determination for the Cache 

County PM2.5 Attainment Plan’s Motor 

Vehicle Emissions Budgets for 

Transportation Conformity Purposes; 

State of Utah 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

is notifying the public that the EPA has 

found the following adequate for 

transportation conformity purposes: The 

Cache County, Logan, UT–ID PM2.5

Attainment Plan, Utah State 

Implementation Plan Section IX. Part 

A.23 and its motor vehicle emissions 

budgets (MVEB). As more fully 

explained in the Supplementary 

Information section of this notice, this 

finding will affect future transportation 

conformity determinations. 

DATES: This finding is effective on 

September 28, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim 

Russ, Air Program, Mailcode 8P–AR, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado 80202–1129, telephone 

number (303) 312–6479, fax number 

(303) 312–6064, or email russ.tim@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our,’’ are used, we mean 

the EPA. Whenever ‘‘State’’ is used, we 

mean the State of Utah. 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). The conformity rule provisions 

at 40 CFR 93 require that transportation 

plans, programs, and projects conform 

to a State Implementation Plan (SIP) and 

establish the criteria and procedures for 

determining whether or not they do. 

Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard. 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP revision’s MVEBs are 

adequate for conformity purposes are 

outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4), which 

was promulgated August 15, 1997 (62 

FR 43780). We described our process for 

determining the adequacy of submitted 

SIP MVEBs in our July 1, 2004 

Transportation Conformity Rule 

Amendments (69 FR 40004). We used 

these resources in making our adequacy 

determinations announced in this 

notice. 

This notice is simply an 

announcement of findings that we have 

already made and are as described 

below: 

The Governor submitted the Cache 

County, Logan, UT–ID PM2.5 Attainment 

Plan, Utah SIP Section IX. Part A.23 1 to 

EPA on December 16, 2014. The State 

prepared the SIP revision submittal to 

meet the requirements of Part D of Title 

I of the CAA for PM2.5 attainment plans, 

subparts 1 and 4 for ‘‘moderate’’ areas. 

As part of our adequacy review, we 

posted the Cache County, Logan, UT–ID 

PM2.5 Attainment Plan, Utah SIP Section 

IX. Part A.23, with its identified MVEBs, 

for adequacy review on EPA’s 

transportation conformity Web site on 

March 23, 2015 (see: http://

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/

transconf/currsips.htm). We requested 

public comments by April 22, 2015. We 

did not receive any comments. The EPA 

sent a letter to the Utah Division of Air 

Quality on June 17, 2015, stating that 

the submitted Cache County, Logan, 

UT–ID PM2.5 Attainment Plan, Utah SIP 

Section IX. Part A.23 and its MVEBs 

were adequate for transportation 

conformity purposes. 

For the Cache County, Logan, UT–ID 

PM2.5 Attainment Plan, Utah SIP Section 

IX. Part A.23, the MVEBs we found 

adequate were 0.32 tons per day (tpd) 

for PM2.5, 4.49 tpd for nitrogen oxides, 

and 3.23 tpd for volatile organic 

compounds. Following the effective 

date listed in the DATES section of this 

notice, the Cache County Metropolitan 

Planning Organization, the Utah 

Department of Transportation, and the 

U.S. Department of Transportation are 

required to use these MVEBs for future 

transportation conformity 

determinations for projects in the Cache 

County, Logan, UT–ID PM2.5

nonattainment area. 

Please note that our adequacy review 

of the MVEBs as described above is 

separate from our future rulemaking 

action on the Cache County, Logan, UT– 

ID PM2.5 Attainment Plan, Utah SIP 

Section IX. Part A.23 revision discussed 

above and should not be used to 

prejudge our ultimate approval or 

disapproval of that SIP revision. Even if 

we find the Cache County, Logan, UT– 

ID PM2.5 Attainment Plan and its 

MVEBs adequate for transportation 

conformity purposes now, we may later 

find it necessary to disapprove the SIP 

revision. Should this situation arise, we 

would then revisit our adequacy 

finding. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: August 26, 2015. 

Shaun L. McGrath, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22942 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 15–08] 

General Motors LLC v. Nippon Yusen 

Kabushiki Kaisa; Wallenius 

Wilhelmsen Logistics As; Eukor Car 

Carriers Inc. 

Notice of Filing of Complaint and 

Assignment 

Notice is given that a complaint has 

been filed with the Federal Maritime 

Commission (Commission) by General 

Motors LLC, hereinafter ‘‘Complainant,’’ 

against Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 

(‘‘NYK Japan’’), Wallenius Wilhemsen 

Logistics AS (‘‘WWL Norway’’), and 

EUKOR Car Carriers Inc. (‘‘EUKOR’’), 

hereinafter ‘‘Respondents.’’ 

Complainant states it is a Delaware 

limited liability company and ‘‘one of 

the world’s largest automobile original 

equipment manufacturers.’’ 

Complainant alleges that Respondent 

NYK Japan is a Japanese company that 

ships vehicles ‘‘into and out of the 

United States.’’ Complainant alleges that 

Respondent WWL Norway is a 

Norwegian company that provides 

‘‘Vehicle Carrier Services for shipments 

to and from the United States.’’ 

Complainant alleges that Respondent 


rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES