alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007074EN.01000701.xml

| 31.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/7

---

MEDIA 2007

MEDIA

Call for proposals — EACEA/09/07

Measures to support promotion and market access: Audiovisual festivals

(2007/C 74/05)

1.   Objectives and Description

This notice of a call for proposals is based on Decision No 1718/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 concerning the implementation of a programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007) (1).

1

The objectives of the above mentioned Council Decision include:

| — | facilitating and encouraging the promotion and movement of European audiovisual and cinema works at trade shows, fairs and audiovisual festivals in Europe and around the globe, insofar as such events may play an important role in the promotion of European works and the networking of professionals; |
| --- | --- |

—

facilitating and encouraging the promotion and movement of European audiovisual and cinema works at trade shows, fairs and audiovisual festivals in Europe and around the globe, insofar as such events may play an important role in the promotion of European works and the networking of professionals;

| — | encouraging the networking of European operators, by supporting joint activities on the European and international markets by national public or private promotion bodies; |
| --- | --- |

—

encouraging the networking of European operators, by supporting joint activities on the European and international markets by national public or private promotion bodies;

2.   Eligible applicants

The present notification is addressed to European organisations; those registered in and controlled by nationals from the Member States of the European Union and countries of the European Economic Agreement participating in the MEDIA 2007 Programme (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway) and Switzerland.

Such organisations must implement audiovisual festivals which contribute to the afore mentioned objectives and which screen a minimum of 70 % European films from at least 10 States participating in the MEDIA Programme, in their total programme.

3.   Budget and project duration

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals is EUR 1 200 000.

The financial support from the Commission cannot exceed 50 % of the total eligible costs.

The present Call for Proposals is only valid for projects audiovisual festivals which start between 1 November 2007 and 30 April 2008.

4.   Deadline

Applications must be sent to the Executive Agency (EACEA) no later than 11 May 2007

11 May 2007

5.   Further information

The complete text of the Call for Proposals, as well as the application forms are available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/media

Applications must respect all conditions set out in this complete text and must be submitted using the application forms provided.

---

(1)  OJ L 327, 24.11.2006, p. 12.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JohnP. Crowley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

|        |   |                        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |   | /s/ John P. Crowley* * |
|   |   | John P. Crowley             |
|   |   | *Chief Financial Officer*   |
|   |   | * *                    |
|   |   | August 7, 2006         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
### §42. Territorial application

The provisions of all Acts of Congress relating to national banks shall apply in the several States, the District of Columbia, the several Territories and possessions of the United States, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(Pub. L. 86–230, §14, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 458.)
#### § 700.803 Authority.

The regulations in this part are promulgated pursuant to section 10(b) of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 U.S.C. 470ii). Section 10(b) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 470ii) provides that each Federal land manager shall promulgate such rules and regulations, consistent with the uniform rules and regulations in this part, as may be necessary for carrying out the purposes of the Act.
### §1141g. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 15, 1929, ch. 24, §9, 46 Stat. 15; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, provided for the recognition, upon application of the advisory commodity committee, of stabilization corporations for commodities, and prescribed functions and operations in connection therewith. Ex. Ord. No. 6084 abolished the authority conferred by this section and ordered the Farm Credit Administration to take appropriate steps for winding up the activities of such corporations. The order is set out as a note preceding section 2241 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, José A. Segrera, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Terremark Worldwide, Inc.     /s/ José A. Segrera           José A. Segrera *Executive Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer* *(Principal Accounting Officer)*Dated: June 29, 2005
# C_2010179EN.01002102.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/21

---

Appeal brought on 28 April 2010 by Enercon GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 3 February 2010 in Case T-472/07: Enercon GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks & Designs)

(Case C-204/10 P)

(2010/C 179/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Enercon GmbH (represented by: J. Mellor, Barrister, R. Böhm, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Hasbro Inc.

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | allow the Appeal against the Judgment of the General Court and annul the Judgment of the General Court, to annul the decision of the fourth Board of Appeal and, as appropriate, the decision of the Opposition Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the Appeal against the Judgment of the General Court and annul the Judgment of the General Court, to annul the decision of the fourth Board of Appeal and, as appropriate, the decision of the Opposition Division;

| — | (as appropriate) remit this case to the Office for a fresh consideration of the issues on this Opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

(as appropriate) remit this case to the Office for a fresh consideration of the issues on this Opposition;

| — | order the intervener and the Office to pay the Appellant's costs of this Appeal |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener and the Office to pay the Appellant's costs of this Appeal

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant submits that the General Court failed to recognise the errors in the decision of the Board of Appeal, based, as it was, on the illegitimate decision of the Opposition Division. In particular there was a complete failure to recognise (a) that the Medion (1) judgment concerned an exceptional situation in which the usual rule that the average consumer normally perceives a trade mark as a matter of overall impression is displaced but (b) no circumstances existed in this case sufficient to justify such an exceptional approach. No part of the earlier mark in this case had an ‘independent distinctive role’.

Furthermore the Appellant submits that, due to the incorrect application of a Medion type principle at the earlier stage of the assessment of similarity, no proper consideration was given to the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.04.2004, p. 31

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF EDWARD J. BOREY PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Edward J. Borey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 10, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    EDWARD J. BOREY               
|Edward J. Borey                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Local and Regional Food Aid Procurement Projects

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), on behalf of the 
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), has closed the application period 
for field-based projects under the USDA Local and Regional Food Aid 
Procurement Pilot Project (USDA LRP Project). All available funding for 
field-based projects has been allocated.

DATES: Effective March 4, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Fisher, Chief, Local and 
Regional Procurement, Food Assistance Division, Foreign Agricultural 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 1034, 1400 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-1034; or by phone (202) 720-5620; or 
by fax: (202) 690-0251; or by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eda1bfbdad8b8c9ec3989e898cc38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="14584644547275673a616770753a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3206 of the Food, Conservation, and 
Energy Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 1726c) directed the Secretary of 
Agriculture (the Secretary) to implement a local and regional food aid 
procurement pilot project in developing countries. The Secretary was 
directed to use CCC funds in the following amounts to carry out the 
pilot project:
    <bullet> $5 million for fiscal year 2009;
    <bullet> $25 million for fiscal year 2010;
    <bullet> $25 million for fiscal year 2011; and
    <bullet> $5 million for fiscal year 2012.

The USDA LRP Project Interim Guidelines provide that FAS will accept 
applications for funding until June 1, 2011 unless FAS publishes a 
notice in the Federal Register to close or extend the application 
period. FAS has allocated all available funding for field-based 
projects, and therefore, by this notice, is closing the application 
period.

    Dated: February 11, 2011.
John D. Brewer,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service, and Vice President, 
Commodity Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2011-4872 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 700.561 Sexual harassment. ( a ) Sexual harassment is a form of employee misconduct which undermines the integrity of the employment relationship. All employees must be allowed to work in an environment free from unsolicited and unwelcome sexual overtures. Sexual harassment is defined by the Office of Personnel Management as “deliberate or repeated unsolicited verbal comments, gestures, or physical contact of a sexual nature which are unwelcome.” Sexual harassment does not refer to occasional compliments. It refers to behavior which is not welcome, which is personally offensive and debilitates morale, interfering with the work effectiveness of its victims and their co-workers.
( b ) Sexual harassment is a prohibited personnel practice when it results in discrimination for or against an employee on the basis of conduct not related to performance. For example: —If submission to sexual advances is a condition of employment, whether expressed in explicit or implicit terms; —If employment decisions, such as promotion, training, salary increases, rewards, etc., are based on an employee's submission to or rejection of sexual advances; —If the sexual conduct substantially interferes with an affected person's work performance, or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment.
( c ) Within the Federal Government, a supervisor who uses implicit or explicit coercive sexual behavior to control, influence, or affect the career, salary or job of an employee is engaging in sexual harassment. Similarly, an employee of an agency who behaves in this manner in the process of conducting agency business is engaging in sexual harassment. Finally, any employee who participates in deliberate or repeated unsolicited verbal comments, gestures, or physical contact of a sexual nature which are unwelcome and interfere with work productivity is also engaging in sexual harassment.
( d ) It is the policy of the Relocation Commission that sexual harassment is unacceptable conduct in the workplace and will not be condoned. An employee who believes that he or she is subject to sexual harassment may contact one or more of the following people within the Commission for assistance: ( 1 ) The immediate supervisor or second level supervisor.
( 2 ) The EEO Counselor.
( 3 ) The agency EEO Officer.
( 4 ) The EEO Counselor at the Agency Liaison Division of the General Services Administration.
-  Home 

# PHMSA Plan for Publishing Approvals

PHMSA PLAN FOR PUBLISHING APPROVALS.pdf (25.55 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bio-One Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Armand Dauplaise,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         a.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         b.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


 /s/ Armand Dauplaise
---------------------------
By: Armand Dauplaise, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 6, 2003
§ 29.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose of this part.* This part implements the Critical Infrastructure Information Act of 2002 (CII Act) by establishing uniform procedures for the receipt, care, and storage of Critical Infrastructure Information voluntarily submitted to the Department of Homeland Security through CISA. Consistent with the statutory mission of DHS to prevent terrorist attacks within the United States and reduce the vulnerability of the United States to terrorism, CISA will encourage the voluntary submission of CII by safeguarding and protecting that information from unauthorized disclosure and by ensuring that such information is, as necessary, securely shared with State and Local governments pursuant to the CII Act. As required by the CII Act, this part establishes procedures regarding: ( 1 ) The acknowledgment of receipt by CISA of voluntarily submitted CII;
( 2 ) The receipt, validation, handling, storage, proper marking, and use of information as PCII;
( 3 ) The safeguarding and maintenance of the confidentiality of such information and appropriate sharing of such information with State and Local governments or government agencies pursuant to 6 U.S.C. 673(a)(1)(E); and
( 4 ) The issuance of advisories, notices, and warnings related to the protection of critical infrastructure or protected systems in such a manner to protect, as appropriate, from unauthorized disclosure the source of critical infrastructure information that forms the basis of the warning, and any information that is proprietary or business sensitive, might be used to identify the submitting person or entity, or is otherwise not appropriately in the public domain.
( b ) *Scope.* This part applies to all persons and entities that are authorized to handle, use, store, or otherwise accept receipt of PCII.
### Part B—Additional Authorities of the Director
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-22 

August 3, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4205(b) Partial Withdrawals. Cessation of Contributions

4212(c) Obligation to Contribute - Liability

4219 Notice & Collection of Withdrawal Liability

4221 Resolution of Disputes 

OPINION: 

 This responds to your request for our opinion concerning the application of the partial withdrawal rule contained

in Section 4205(b)(2)(A)(ii) of ERISA. Specifically you request clarification of the meaning of the term "facility"; i.e.,

"whether the term refers to a discrete geographic location or whether it has a broader application." We conclude that the

term ordinarily refers to a discrete geographic location for purposes of this rule. Section 4205(b) provides in relevant

part: 

(b) For purposes of subsection (a) -- 

* * * 

(2)(A) There is a partial cessation of the employer's contribution obligation for the plan year if, during such year --

* * * 

(ii) an employer permanently ceases to have an obligation to contribute under the plan with respect to work

performed at one or more but fewer than all of its facilities, but continues to perform work at the facility of the type for

which the obligation to contribute ceased. (Emphasis added.) 

Thus, the statute is clear that work of the same type [*2] must continue at the same facility for which contributions

were previously required. It is our view that this ordinarily refers to a facility which continues operations at a discrete

location. However, there may be circumstances under which the plan sponsor will determine that a shift of operations

from one location to another constitutes a continuation of operations at the facility. See also Section 4212(c) of ERISA.

If the plan sponsor makes such a determination, and if the employer objects, the matter must then be resolved through

the dispute resolution procedures described in Sections 4219 and 4221 of ERISA. 

I hope this is of assistance to you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 8.5 Interest, penalties, and administrative costs. ( a ) The Commission shall assess interest, penalties, and administrative costs on debts owed to the United States Government in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 31 CFR 901.9.
( b ) The Commission shall waive collection of interest and administrative costs on a debt or any portion of the debt that is paid in full within thirty days after the date on which the interest begins to accrue.
( c ) The Commission may waive collection of interest, penalties, and administrative costs if it: ( 1 ) Determines that collection is against equity and good conscience or not in the best interest of the United States, including when an administrative offset or installment agreement is in effect; or
( 2 ) Determines that waiver is appropriate under the criteria for compromise of debts set forth at 31 CFR 902.2(a).
( d ) The Commission is authorized to impose interest and related charges on debts not subject to 31 U.S.C. 3717, in accordance with common law.
### §4503. Protection of taxpayers against liability

This chapter may not be construed as obligating the Federal Government, either directly or indirectly, to provide any funds to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Federal National Mortgage Association, or the Federal Home Loan Banks, or to honor, reimburse, or otherwise guarantee any obligation or liability of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Federal National Mortgage Association, or the Federal Home Loan Banks. This chapter may not be construed as implying that any such enterprise or Bank, or any obligations or securities of such an enterprise or Bank, are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title XIII, §1304, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "This title and the amendments made by this title", meaning title XIII of Pub. L. 102–550, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3941, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title XIII to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4501 of this title and Tables.