alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4301. Findings and purpose

#### (a) Findings

The Congress hereby finds that economic stability would be enhanced, competition between depository institutions would be improved, and the ability of the consumer to make informed decisions regarding deposit accounts, and to verify accounts, would be strengthened if there was uniformity in the disclosure of terms and conditions on which interest is paid and fees are assessed in connection with such accounts.

#### (b) Purpose

It is the purpose of this chapter to require the clear and uniform disclosure of—

(1) the rates of interest which are payable on deposit accounts by depository institutions; and

(2) the fees that are assessable against deposit accounts,

so that consumers can make a meaningful comparison between the competing claims of depository institutions with regard to deposit accounts.

(Pub. L. 102–242, title II, §262, Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2334.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 102–242, title II, §261, Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2334, provided that: "This subtitle [subtitle F (§§261–274) of title II of Pub. L. 102–242, enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Truth in Savings Act'."

#### Separability

If any provision of Pub. L. 102–242 or any application of any provision thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of Pub. L. 102–242 and the application of any remaining provision of such Act to any other person or circumstance not to be affected by such holding, see section 481 of Pub. L. 102–242, set out as a note under section 1811 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 23.1
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

      ****We  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-2 (File No. 333-110831), Form S-3 (File No.’s  333-90532 and 333-68088) and Form S-8 (File No.’s 333-68166, 333-54584, 333-54582, 333-110590, 333-105031) of Wits Basin Precious  Minerals, Inc and subsidiaries of our report dated January 30, 2004 (except as to Note 16, as to which the date is February 11, 2004)  which appears on Page 35 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP 
Minneapolis, Minnesota  March 30, 2004**
#### § 173.13 Permit not a lease.

Any permit issued under this part does not grant any leasehold interest nor cover the sale, barter, merchandising, or renting of any supplies or equipment except as therein specified. Any permittee who engages in trade with the Indians must also apply for and receive a trader's license as provided by part 140 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Mary J. Twinem, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
November 3, 2009
 By:
                            /s/
      Mary J. TwinemMary
      J. Twinem
                                Chief
      Financial Officer
---

CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Christian Lown, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all
        reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
        reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
        respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
        servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
        statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration
        agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
        servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation
        AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
        10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
 [Signature Page Follows]
 
 
 Date:  March 29, 2019/s/ CHRISTIAN LOWNChristian LownPresident and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)Navient Funding, LLC
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-160 

August 30, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4044 Allocation of Assets 

OPINION: 

 This responds to your inquiry whether your fee for terminating * * * (the "Trust") may be paid out of Trust assets.

You indicate that the trustees of the Trust have authorized you to perform the services in question. For purposes of

answering your inquiry, we assume that you and they have agreed or will agree upon a reasonable fee. 

The assets of a pension plan may be charged for termination-related expenses for which the plan is responsible. The

provisions of the plan documents govern the matter of who is responsible for particular plan expenses. 

The only Trust provision concerning the payment of administrative expenses is paragraph 6.06(d), which provides

in pertinent part: 

6.06 With respect to any funds at any time constituting part of the Pension Trust the Trustees in their sole discretion,

are authorized and empowered: 

* * * 

(k) To the extent permitted by law, to delegate duties or powers, discretionary or otherwise, to agents, or co-Trustee;

to employ counsel, accountants, agents, custodians, investment counsel and such other persons as they may deem

advisable, at the expense of the trust, and to remunerate them and pay their expenses. 

In light [*2] of this provision, charging the Trust for your termination-related services will not violate Title IV of

the Employee Petirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the ("Act"). The PBGC has no authority to decide any questions

that your inquiry may raise under Title I of the Act, which is administered by the United States Department of Labor.

I trust this is of assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF JAMES A. RICHMAN PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James A. Richman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 9, 2004



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ JAMES A. RICHMAN                    
|James A. Richman Chief Financial Officer
EX-4.2 SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE, SERIES 2008ND-NV









Exhibit 4.2








	ORGANIZED UNDER THE CAWS OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA




	THE SOUTH FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
10% MANDATORY CONVERTIBLE NON CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES 2008ND-V




	THIS CERTIFIES THAT Specimen
is the owner of *** One Hundred*** Shares




	Transferable only one the looks of the corporation by the holder hereof in persons or by money upon surrender up
this certificate properly endorsed




	IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the said corporation has caused this certificate to be sign by ed duly authorized officers and
its corporate to be on to affect this 8th day of May A D 2008






 









 












	THE SHARES EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED
(THE “SECURITIES ACT”) OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION. THE SHARES MAY NOT BE
OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT (1) PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OR (2) AN EXEMPTION FROM EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, IN EACH CASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL
APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS AND THE SECURITIES LAWS OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS, AND IN THE CASE OF A TRANSACTION EXEMPT FROM
REGISTRATION, UNLESS THE COMPANY HAS RECEIVED AN OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO IT THAT SUCH TRANSACTION DOES
NOT REQUIRE REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND SUCH OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS.




	CERTIFICATE
FOR
100
SHARES
THE SOUTH FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
Mandatory Convertible
non-cumulative Preferred Stock
Series 2008 ND-v




	ISSUED TO SAMPLE
DATE
MAY 8, 2008




	fore value received here by sell assign and transfer and —shares represented by the within certificate and do
here by irrevocably constitute and appoint to transfer the said sheres on the books of the within name corporation
with fullpower of substitution in the premises dated —in presence of




	NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THE ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICAT
IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
# C_2007082EN.01003401.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/34

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 February 2007 — Ontex v OHIM — Curon Medical (CURON)

(Case T-353/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark CURON - Opposition by the proprietor of the Community word mark EURON - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2007/C 82/74)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ontex NV (Buggenhout, Belgium) (represented by: M. Du Tré, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Curon Medical Inc. (Sunnyvale, California, United States) (represented by: C. Algar and J. Cohen, solicitors, and T. Ludbrook, barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 July 2004 (Case R 22/2004-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Ontex NV and Curon Medical, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 6.11.2004.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) of Vital Images, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon March 2, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Jay D. Miller, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Periodic Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  | March 2, 2004 |                                        |   | /s/ Jay D. Miller |
|--------------|---------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|
|         |          | Jay D. Miller                               |
|         |          | Chief Executive Officer  Vital Images, Inc. |

 

----
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Robert L. Krakoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Robert  L. Krakoff  |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert L. Krakoff       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | Date: May  13, 2003     |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

This certification is beingsubmitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose ofcomplying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode. This certification shall not to be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), orotherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification does notconstitute a part of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q accompanyingthis certification and to which it is an exhibit.

 

----
FOIA REQUESTS FY 2006 

 

 

 

Requestor Nature of Request Date Response 

 

Michael Henry Brum Request Confirmation of validity of 1863 

Act establishing $.03 stamp 

10/21/05 10/21/05 

Matthew B. Tully Requesting copies of claims filed under 

OPM Compensation Memo 2004-19 

11/11/05 11/14/05 

Daniel Driscoll Request Documents Related to 

“AuthentiDate Holding Corp” 

03/03/2006 03/06/2006 

James I. Standfield Request for Impact Cardholders 05/30/06 05/30/06 

Joe Samudovsky/UAL Request for International Mail Report to 

Congress for FY 2005, Docket IM2006-1 

07/11/06 07/27/06 

8/23/06, 

10/30/06 

Robin Lahiri Request for Business Contractor Data 

including Employee Identification 

Number’s, in a database 

07/19/06 08/2/06 

Alison Wesley Request for refunds/credits over $5,000 

as a result of undeliverable payments. 

7/31/06 8/2/06
### **CHAPTER 22—TYING ARRANGEMENTS**

Sec.
1971.
Definitions.
1972.
Certain tying arrangements prohibited; correspondent accounts.
1973.
Jurisdiction of courts; duty of United States attorneys; equitable proceedings; petition; expedition of cases; temporary restraining orders; bringing in additional parties; subpenas.
1974.
Actions by United States; subpenas for witnesses.
1975.
Civil actions by persons injured; jurisdiction and venue; amount of recovery.
1976.
Injunctive relief for persons against threatened loss or damages; equitable proceedings; preliminary injunctions.
1977.
Limitation of actions; suspension of limitations.
1978.
Actions under other Federal or State laws unaffected; regulations or orders barred as a defense.
### [§2661a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–295, §1(31)(A), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1296]

Section, added Pub. L. 97–258, §2(b)(6)(B), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1054, authorized appropriations for advance design of military public works not otherwise authorized and for construction management of foreign government funded projects used primarily by United States armed forces, and required preliminary reports to Congress on military public works whose projected advance costs exceeded a specified level.

The repeal of this section by Pub. L. 97–295 reflected the effect of section 7(2) and (8) of the Military Construction Codification Act (Pub. L. 97–214, July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 173), which repealed the source statutes of this section (subsec. (a) was based on acts Sept. 28, 1951, ch. 434, §504, 65 Stat. 364; July 15, 1955, ch. 368, §512, 69 Stat. 352; Dec. 23, 1981, Pub. L. 97–99, §902, 95 Stat. 1381 (31 U.S.C. 723); and subsec. (b) was based on acts Sept. 12, 1966, Pub. L. 89–568, §612, 80 Stat. 756; Dec. 27, 1974, Pub. L. 93–552, §607, 88 Stat. 1763 (31 U.S.C. 723a)) subsequent to Apr. 15, 1982, the cut-off date prescribed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 97–258, section 2(b)(6)(B) of which enacted this section.
# C_2006281EN.01004302.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/43

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2006 — Izar Construcciones Navales v Commission

(Case T-382/03) (1)

1

(2006/C 281/77)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 21, 24.1.2004.

1

---
(logo) COHNREZNICK 

ACCOUNTING∙ TAX ∙ ADVISORY

 

CohnReznickLLP

cohnreznick.com

 

 

Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

ToTorchlight Loan Services, LLC

 

Wehave examined management of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC("Torchlight")'s assertion that Torchlight complied with theservicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of theSecurities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the special servicingplatform ("Platform") for commercial mortgage-backed securitiestransaction that were issued on or after December 1, 2002 for which Torchlight actedas the special servicer included in the accompanying Management's CertificationRegarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB asof and for the year ended December 31, 2018. Torchlight's management isresponsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement's assertion based on our examination.

 

Managementhas determined that the criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C),(d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix),(d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv) arenot applicable to the activities performed by Torchlight, as a specialservicer, with respect to the Company's Platform. The commercial mortgage-backedsecurities transactions covered by this Platform are those specified in AppendixB in the accompanying Management's Certification Regarding Compliance with ApplicableServicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards establishedby the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Thosestandards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonableassurance about whether management's assertion is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtainevidence about management's assertion. The nature, timing, and extent of theprocedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of therisks of material misstatement of management's assertion, whether due to fraudor error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient andappropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on Torchlight's compliancewith the specified requirements.

 

Inour opinion, management's assertion that Torchlight complied with the servicingcriteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation ABincluded in the accompanying Management's Certification Regarding Compliancewith Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB is fairly stated, inall material respects.

 

 

/s/CohnReznick LLP

 

Bethesda,Maryland

February25, 2019
### §215a–3. Mergers and consolidations with subsidiaries and nonbank affiliates

#### (a) In general

Upon the approval of the Comptroller, a national bank may merge with one or more of its nonbank subsidiaries or affiliates.

#### (b) Scope

Nothing in this section shall be construed—

(1) to affect the applicability of section 1828(c) of this title; or

(2) to grant a national bank any power or authority that is not permissible for a national bank under other applicable provisions of law.

#### (c) Regulations

The Comptroller shall promulgate regulations to implement this section.

(Nov. 7, 1918, ch. 209, §6, as added Pub. L. 106–569, title XII, §1206, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 3034.)
Order entered January 27, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00349-CR

RONALD GAYLON ROSSER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-81000-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 22, 2020 motion asking the Court to consider a 

correction to appellant’s brief. We note that we are unable to alter electronically filed 

documents.

To the extent appellant seeks to file an amended brief, we GRANT his request and 

ORDER any amended brief filed on or before February 6, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
# C_2006326EN.01005601.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/56

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 November 2006 — Chetcuti v Commission

(Case T-357/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Internal competition - Non-admission to tests as a member of the auxiliary staff)

(2006/C 326/120)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marguerite Chetcuti (Zejtun, Malta) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and M. Velardo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Selection Board's decision of 22 June 2004 rejecting the applicant's candidature and of subsequent acts in the competition procedure

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

1

---