alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1176

To provide for greater access to child care services for Federal employees.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. ROBB (for himself, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. SARBANES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To provide for greater access to child care services for

Federal employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHILD CARE SERVICES FOR FEDERAL EMPLOY4 EES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—An Executive agency that pro6 vides or proposes to provide child care services for Federal

7 employees may use appropriated funds (otherwise avail8 able to such agency for salaries) to provide child care, in

9 a Federal or leased facility, or through contract, for em10 ployees of such agency.
2

•S 1176 IS

1 (b) AFFORDABILITY.—Amounts so provided with re2 spect to any such facility or contractor shall be applied

3 to improve the affordability of child care for lower income

4 Federal employees using or seeking to use the child care

5 services offered by such facility or contractor.

6 (c) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after

7 the date of enactment of this Act, the Office of Personnel

8 Management shall issue regulations necessary to carry out

9 this section.

10 (d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Execu11 tive agency’’ has the meaning given such term under sec12 tion 105 of title 5, United States Code, but does not in13 clude the General Accounting Office.

Æ
### §31. Rights and liabilities as affected by change of name

All debts, liabilities, rights, provisions, and powers of the association under its old name shall devolve upon and inure to the association under its new name.

(May 1, 1886, ch. 73, §3, 24 Stat. 19.)
§ 37.1 Applicability. ( a ) Subparts A through E of this part apply to States and U.S. territories that choose to issue driver's licenses and identification cards that can be accepted by Federal agencies for official purposes.
( b ) Subpart F establishes certain standards for State-issued driver's licenses and identification cards issued by States that participate in REAL ID, but that are not intended to be accepted by Federal agencies for official purpose under section 202(d)(11) of the REAL ID Act.
### §162. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–671, §6, July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 552.

Section, act Feb. 26, 1881, ch. 82, 21 Stat. 352, prescribed the manner of verification of reports of condition of national banks. See section 1817 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1961, see section 7 of Pub. L. 86–671, set out as an Effective Date of 1960 Amendment note under section 1817 of this title.
### §2021. Loans through associations or agents

#### (a) In general

The Farm Credit Banks shall, except as otherwise herein provided, make loans of the type authorized under section 2015(a) of this title through a Federal land bank association chartered to serve the territory in which the real estate of the borrower is located.

#### (b) No active association

If there is no active association chartered to serve territory where the real estate is located, the bank may make the loan directly or through such bank or trust company or savings or other financial institution as such bank may designate.

#### (c) Purchase of stock required

When the loan is not made through a Federal land bank association, the applicant shall purchase stock in the bank in accordance with the capitalization requirements provided for in the bylaws of the bank.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title I, §1.13, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1628.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1.13 of Pub. L. 92–181 was classified to section 2031 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 100–233, §401.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §401, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1622, provided that this section is effective 6 months after Jan. 6, 1988.
# C_2006212EN.01002702.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/27

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 July 2006 — Franchet and Byk v Commission

(Joined Cases T-391/03 and T-70/04) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Investigations of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - Eurostat - Refusal of access - Inspections and investigations - Court proceedings - Rights of the defence)

(2006/C 212/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Yves Franchet and Daniel Byk (Luxembourg), represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, avocats)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities, represented by D. Maidani, J.-F. Pasquier and P. Aalto, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of decisions of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and of the Commission refusing the applicants access to certain documents relating to an enquiry concerning Eurostat

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the applications for annulment of the decision of 18 August 2003 and the implicit decision to reject the applicants' applications of 21 and 29 October 2003 as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the applications for annulment of the decision of 18 August 2003 and the implicit decision to reject the applicants' applications of 21 and 29 October 2003 as inadmissible;

| 2. | Annuls the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 1 October 2003 in so far as it refuses access to the communications from OLAF to the Commission other than that referred to in the press release of 19 May 2003, and the Commission decision of 19 December 2003 in so far as it refuses access to the annexes to the report of the internal audit service of 7 July 2003; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 1 October 2003 in so far as it refuses access to the communications from OLAF to the Commission other than that referred to in the press release of 19 May 2003, and the Commission decision of 19 December 2003 in so far as it refuses access to the annexes to the report of the internal audit service of 7 July 2003;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the actions as unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the actions as unfounded;

| 4 | Orders the Commission to pay one third of the applicants' costs and the parties otherwise to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4

Orders the Commission to pay one third of the applicants' costs and the parties otherwise to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 21, 14.1.2004.

1

---
EX-34.5
(logo) Grant Thornton


Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants on Management's Assertion
on Compliance

Grant Thornton LLP
1717 Main Street, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201-4667

T 214.561.2300
F 214.561.2370
GrantThornton.com
linkd.in/GrantThorntonUS
twitter.com/GrantThorntonUS

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Situs Holdings, LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Compliance ("Management's Assertion"), that Situs Holdings LLC
(the "Company") complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB included in Appendix A as of December 31, 2012 and for the period June 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012, with respect to the Company's Operating or
Trust Advisor Services performed over the deals listed in Appendix B (the
"Platform"). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Services and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. Our examination was not designed to detect material
noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report
and that may have affected the Company's activities with respect to the
Platform during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Situs Holdings LLC complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of December 31, 2012 and for
the period June 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, for the Services, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 22, 2013

Grant Thornton LLP
U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
#### Anthony Maresco *v.*Walter F. Borysewicz et al.

*Richard 8. 8calo,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Harold Sobel,*for the appellants (defendants).

Argued April 2

decided April 2, 1974

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is granted.
### Federal Land Bank Associations Generally
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

## Related Documents

                  -                                          PD-20RF Decision                   

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Fax:**202-366-4566****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# PD-20(RF): Cleveland, Ohio permit and other requirements for transportation of explosives and other hazardous materials within the City
EXAMPLES

REQUIRED IDENTIFICATION FOR 

PENTAGON ACCESS

U.S. Passport U.S. Passport Card

Drivers license or State

issued ID card/ with photo

U.S. Government PIV or 

Common Access Card (CAC)

Foreign Passport

Federal, State or local governent

issued ID card/ with photo

DoD Affiliated ID Card

Retirees, Dependents, and Inactive Reservists

Native American Tribal

Document

U.S. Border Crossing Card

Permanent Resident Card or 

Alien Registration Receipt Card (INS Form I-551)

Foreign passport w/ temp (I-551) stamp or 

temp (I-551) printed notation on machine readable

immigrant visa.

One form of government issued, unexpired photo identification will be required. 

The Pentagon is a REAL ID Act (2005) compliant facility. Identification must be compliant 

with the Congressionally mandated Real ID Act of 2005.

● State Driver’s License, Enhanced Driver’s License or Non-Driver’s 

 Identification Card 

● U.S. Government Common Access Card, Military Identification Card, or 

 Personal Identification Verification Card

● U.S. Passport or Passport Card

● Foreign Passport

● Permanent Resident Card or Alien Registration Receipt Card

● Native American Tribal Document

● U.S. Border Crossing Card

No identification is required for children age 17 and under when accompanied by an adult
Exhibit 23.1
  Consent
    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
     Form 10-K
  
    Form S-3
    (Registration
    Nos.333-146589,
    333-127622,
    333-102286,
    333-121133,
    333-37060,
    333-123775,
    and
    333-160385;
    Form S-4
    (Registration
    No.333-166555); and
    Form S-8
    (Registration
    Nos.333-154746,
    333-146848,
    333-132995,
    333-118369,
    333-98331).  (signed)
    KPMG LLP
#### Willard Goetcheus, Appellant, *v.*Edmund S. Matthewson et al., Respondents.

(Argued April 17, *1877;*

decided April 24, 1877.)

*John G.*Hunt, for appellant.

*Giles W.*Hotchkiss, for respondents.

Agree to affirm order, without costs, oa opinion of Tat., cott, J., in court below.

All concur, Miller, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1132 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1132

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the reinvestment of 
    employee stock ownership plan dividends without the loss of any 
                          dividend deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 1999

 Mr. Breaux (for himself and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the reinvestment of 
    employee stock ownership plan dividends without the loss of any 
                          dividend deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ESOP Dividend Reinvestment and 
Participant Security Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. ESOP DIVIDENDS MAY BE REINVESTED WITHOUT LOSS OF DIVIDEND 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 404(k)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 (defining applicable dividends) is amended by striking ``or'' 
at the end of clause (ii), by redesignating clause (iii) as clause 
(iv), and by inserting after clause (ii) the following new clause:
                            ``(iii) is, at the election of such 
                        participants or their beneficiaries--
                                    ``(I) payable as provided in clause 
                                (i) or (ii), or
                                    ``(II) paid to the plan and 
                                reinvested in qualifying employee 
                                securities, or''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1132

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the reinvestment

of employee stock ownership plan dividends without the loss of any

dividend deduction.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 26, 1999

Mr. BREAUX (for himself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the

reinvestment of employee stock ownership plan dividends

without the loss of any dividend deduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ESOP Dividend Rein5 vestment and Participant Security Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. ESOP DIVIDENDS MAY BE REINVESTED WITHOUT

7 LOSS OF DIVIDEND DEDUCTION.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 404(k)(2)(A) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining applicable dividends)
2

•S 1132 IS

1 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (ii), by

2 redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv), and by inserting

3 after clause (ii) the following new clause:

4 ‘‘(iii) is, at the election of such par5 ticipants or their beneficiaries—

6 ‘‘(I) payable as provided in clause

7 (i) or (ii), or

8 ‘‘(II) paid to the plan and rein9 vested in qualifying employee securi10 ties, or’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

13 December 31, 1999.

Æ
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated October 15, 2015, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated October 15, 2015, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2015-3US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Karleen Munns, am a Director of Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited (the Servicer).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the period from October 29, 2015 (the date of issuance of the SMART ABS Series 2015-3US Trust transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through
March 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                              |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|Date: 17 June 2016           
|                             
|/s/ Karleen Munns            
|Karleen Munns
Director       
|                             
|Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited
Information provided by SENASA for the recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a Region comprised

in Article 92.2 - Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations in regards to F&MD.

__________________________________________________________________ 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

SENASA – Risk Analysis unit 

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY 

SERVICE 

APPENDIX V: 

PRODUCTS IMPORTATION 2002 

April 2003
Bovine Swine Ovine

Beef Offals Fats Skins Mills Dairy Pork Offals Fats Mills Meat Skins Wool Offals

Fresh Processed Fresh Porcessed Fresh Processed

Uruguay X X X X X X X X

Paraguay X X

Brazil X X X X

New Zealand X X X

United States X X X X

Australia X

Chile X X

Canada X X

Spain 

Denmark X X

Sweden 

Hungary 

France X X

Norway 

Peru X

Holland

Polland X

Germany X

Italy X X

Belgium X
# C_2007006EN.01000402.xml

| 11.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4483 — AVNET/ACCESS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/08)

On 19 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4483. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4483. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### § 81.2 When does this part apply?

(a) This part applies only to federally recognized tribes, in the circumstances shown in the following table.

| If a tribe wants to . . . | And . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Adopt a new governing document to reorganize under Federal statute | The Federal statute requires an election before or after Secretarial approval. |
| (2) Adopt a new governing document to reorganize outside Federal statute | The governing document requires approval under the Secretary's general authority to approve. |
| (3) Amend or revoke a governing document adopted under Federal statute | The Federal statute requires an election and approval for amendment or revocation. |
| (4) Amend or revoke a governing document adopted outside Federal statute | The governing document requires Secretarial approval of an amendment or revocation. |
| (5) Ratify a federal charter of incorporation | The charter requires Secretarial approval or is being ratified under the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act (OIWA). |
| (6) Amend a federal charter of incorporation | The charter requires a Secretarial election to amend. |
| (7) Take other action | A Federal statute or tribal law requires a Secretarial election in order to take that action. |
| (8) Remove the requirement for a Secretarial approval from a governing document | A Federal statute or tribal law requires a Secretarial election in order to take that action. |

(b) Secretarial elections will be conducted in accordance with the procedures in this part unless the amendment article of the tribe's governing document provides otherwise and is not contrary to Federal voting qualifications or substantive provisions, in which case the provisions of those documents shall rule, where applicable.

(c) If the amendment provisions of a tribal governing document have become outdated and the amendment cannot be effected under them, and the recognized tribal governing body requests a Secretarial election, the Bureau may authorize a Secretarial election under this part to amend the documents.