alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1775. Conditions upon conversion to Federal status

Any District of Columbia credit union converting into a Federal credit union in accordance with sections 1773 to 1775 of this title shall thereupon be subject to the limitations, vested with the powers, and charged with the liabilities conferred and imposed by the Federal Credit Union Act [12 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.] upon credit unions organized thereunder, except that—

(1) no fee shall be imposed upon a credit union converting pursuant to sections 1773 to 1775 of this title as an incident to its conversion;

(2) any loan or investment made by a credit union converting pursuant to sections 1773 to 1775 of this title in conformity with the District of Columbia Credit Unions Act prior to its conversion, which does not conform to the requirements of the Federal Credit Union Act and is still outstanding at the time of conversion, shall be liquidated at or before its maturity or, if it has no maturity date, in a prudent manner and within a reasonable period of time;

(3) a credit union converting pursuant to sections 1773 to 1775 of this title shall submit proposed bylaws to the Board for the Board's approval after its conversion, but not later than thirty days following its next annual meeting or six months after August 1, 1964, whichever is later: Provided, That any existing bylaw inconsistent with any other requirements of the Federal Credit Union Act shall be deemed null and void.

(Pub. L. 88–395, §3, Aug. 1, 1964, 78 Stat. 377; Pub. L. 91–206, §3, Mar. 10, 1970, 84 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 95–630, title V, §501, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3680.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Credit Union Act, referred to in text, is act June 26, 1934, ch. 750, 48 Stat. 1216, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1751 of this title and Tables.

The District of Columbia Credit Unions Act, referred to in par. (2), was act June 23, 1932, ch. 272, 47 Stat. 326, and was repealed by Pub. L. 88–395, §4, Aug. 1, 1964, 78 Stat. 377.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Federal Credit Union Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Board" and "the Board's", meaning the National Credit Union Administration Board, substituted in par. (3) for "Director" and "his", respectively, meaning Director of Bureau of Federal Credit Unions, pursuant to section 3 of Pub. L. 91–206 and section 501 of Pub. L. 95–630 [12 U.S.C. 1752a] which transferred functions of Bureau of Federal Credit Unions, and Director thereof, to National Credit Union Administration and vested authority for management of Administration in National Credit Union Administration Board.
# C_2007082EN.01003203.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/32

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 February 2007 — Wunenberger v Commission

(Joined Cases T-246/04 and T-71/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Staff Reports - Reporting exercises 1997/1999 and 1999/2001 - Career development report - 2001/2002 appraisal procedure - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Action for damages - Rights of the defence)

(2007/C 82/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jacques Wunenberger (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid, H. Krämer and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, actions for annulment of the applicant's draft staff reports for the periods 1997/1999 and 1999/2001 and the applicant's Career Development Report for the 2001/2002 appraisal procedure and, second, claims for damages for the alleged harm.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 11 September 2003 definitively approving the applicant's Career Development Report for the period 1 July 2001 to 21 December 2002; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 11 September 2003 definitively approving the applicant's Career Development Report for the period 1 July 2001 to 21 December 2002;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the applicant the amount of EUR 2 500, in addition to the amount of EUR 2 500 already granted by the Appointing Authority, for the delay in drawing up the staff reports for the periods 1997/1999 and 1999/2001, and the symbolic amount of EUR 1 for the delay in drawing up the Career Development Report for the period 2001/2002; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the applicant the amount of EUR 2 500, in addition to the amount of EUR 2 500 already granted by the Appointing Authority, for the delay in drawing up the staff reports for the periods 1997/1999 and 1999/2001, and the symbolic amount of EUR 1 for the delay in drawing up the Career Development Report for the period 2001/2002;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the actions; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the actions;

| 4. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 28.8.2004.

1

---
```

[109th Congress Public Law 440]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ440.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 3286]]

Public Law 109-440
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To extend oversight and accountability related to United States 
 reconstruction funds and efforts in Iraq by extending the termination 
      date of the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq 
          Reconstruction. <<NOTE: Dec. 20, 2006 -  [S. 4046]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Iraq 
Reconstruction Accountability Act of 2006.>> 

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 5 USC app. 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Iraq Reconstruction Accountability 
Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE TERMINATION DATE FOR THE OFFICE OF THE 
            SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION.

    Section 3001(o) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for 
Defense and for the Reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan, 2004 (Public 
Law 108-106; 117 Stat. 1238; 5 U.S.C. App., note to section 8G of Public 
Law 95-452), as amended by section 1054(b) of the John Warner National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364), is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(o) Termination.--(1)(A) The Office of the Inspector General shall 
terminate 10 months after 80 percent of the funds appropriated or 
otherwise made available to the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund have 
been expended.
    ``(B) For purposes of calculating the termination of the Office of 
the Inspector General under this subsection, any United States funds 
appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2006 for the 
reconstruction of Iraq, irrespective of the designation of such funds, 
shall be deemed to be amounts appropriated or otherwise made available 
to the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund.
    ``(2) <<NOTE: Reports.>> The Special Inspector General for Iraq 
Reconstruction shall, prior to the termination of the Office of the 
Special Inspector General under paragraph (1), prepare a final forensic 
audit report 

[[Page 120 STAT. 3287]]

on all funds deemed to be amounts appropriated or otherwise made 
available to the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund.''.

    Approved December 20, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 4046:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 8, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
### Hydrogeology of the karst of Puerto Rico

By: Ennio V. Giusti

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1012

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

About one-fifth of Puerto Rico is covered by a tropical karst formed on a series of six limestone formations ranging in age from middle-Oligocene to middle Miocene. These formations strike east to west and crop out over the north coast of the island. Structurally, the rocks form a simple wedge abutting southward against a mountain chain of volcanic origin and thickening northward to about 1,400 meters by the seashore. All stages of karstification are present: from the incipient, found at the western end of the belt to the residual, found at the eastern end. Maximum development of sinkholes occurs on the Aguada Limestone and upper part of the Aymanom Limestone. These formations have a CaCO3 content range from about 85 to 95 percent. The denudation rate of the Limestone belt through solution is computed as 0.70 mm per year with some evidence that abrasion may increase the denudation rate locally by as much as 40 percent. 

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Execution
      Version

    


    AUTHORIZATION
      AGREEMENT

    


    I,
      Ju
      Baochun  ,
      a
      citizen of the PRC, ID No. ________________, owns 80% equity interests in
      Tianjin Yinse Lingdong Advertising Co., Ltd, hereby irrevocably authorize
      Jeffrey Dash to exercise the following powers and rights during the term of
      this
      Authorization Agreement:

    


    I
      hereby
      authorize Jeffrey Dash to exercise on my behalf at the shareholders' meetings
      of
      Tianjin Yinse Lingdong Advertising Co., Ltd. (“Yinse”)
      the
      full voting rights as a shareholder of Yinse as have been given to me by law
      and
      under the articles of association of Yinse, including but not limited to, the
      voting rights regarding the sale or transfer of any or all of the shares of
      Yinse held by myself, acting as my authorized representative at the
      shareholders’ meeting of Yinse to designate and appoint the directors of Yinse
      and executing and/or stamping, for and on behalf of the undersigned, such
      resolutions adopted at any shareholders’ meeting of Yinse and any other
      documents pertinent to the exercise of any of the rights of the undersigned
      in
      its capacity as a shareholder of Yinse that requires its execution.

    


    The
      term
      of this Authorization Agreement is ten (10) years commencing from the execution
      date of this Authorization Agreement unless the earlier termination of the
      Exclusive Technical, Operational, Business Consulting and Services Agreement
      executed by Legend Media (Beijing) Consulting Co., Ltd. ,
      Yinse,
      Xue Wei
      and
      myself for any reason. 

    


    This
      Authorization Agreement is executed in both English and Chinese, with equal
      validity and legal effect. In the event of any discrepancy between the English
      and Chinese versions, the English version shall prevail.

     

    
      	
              Ju
                Baochun

            
	
               

            
	
              /s/
                Ju
                Baochun  

            
	
              Date:
                May 30, 2008
# C_2007042EN.01000302.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Överklagandenämnden för högskolan, Sweden) — Kaj Lyyski v Umeå universitet

(Case C-40/05) (1)

1

(Freedom of movement for workers - Article 39 CE - Obstacles - Vocational training - Teachers - Refusal to admit to a training course a candidate employed in a school in another Member State)

(2007/C 42/05)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Överklagandenämnden för högskolan

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kaj Lyyski

Applicant:

Defendant: Umeå universitet

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Överklagandenämnden för högskolan (Board of Appeals for Higher Education) — Interpretation of Community law and in particular of Article 12 EC — Professional training scheme organised to remedy a lack of qualified teachers in a Member State intended to allow teachers employed in schools to obtain the qualifications necessary for a contract unlimited as to time — Refusal to admit a candidate who is a national of that Member State but employed in a school in another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Community law does not preclude national legislation which organises, on a provisional basis, training courses intended in the short term to meet the need for qualified teachers in a State from requiring that candidates for that training be employed in a school in that State, provided, however, that the manner in which that legislation is applied does not lead to the exclusion, as a matter of principle, of all applications made by teachers who are not employed in such a school without prior individual assessment of the merits of those applications in the light, inter alia, of the aptitude of the person concerned, and the possibility of monitoring the practical part of the training received or possibly of exempting that person from it.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.

1

---
### §250. Independence of financial regulatory agencies

No officer or agency of the United States shall have any authority to require the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or the National Credit Union Administration to submit legislative recommendations, or testimony, or comments on legislation, to any officer or agency of the United States for approval, comments, or review, prior to the submission of such recommendations, testimony, or comments to the Congress if such recommendations, testimony, or comments to the Congress include a statement indicating that the views expressed therein are those of the agency submitting them and do not necessarily represent the views of the President.

(Pub. L. 93–495, title I, §111, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1506; Pub. L. 103–325, title III, §331(a), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2232; Pub. L. 106–102, title VI, §606(e)(2), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1455; Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title I, §1102(b), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2664.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Federal Reserve Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–289 substituted "the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency" for "the Federal Housing Finance Board".

1999—Pub. L. 106–102 substituted "Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Housing Finance Board," for "Federal Home Loan Bank Board,".

1994—Pub. L. 103–325 inserted "the Comptroller of the Currency," after "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,".
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-11 

January 14, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4007(b) Payment of Premiums. Penalties and Interest 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of December 16, 1974. In that letter you requested a 60 day waiver of interest and

penalty charges for failure to pay first full plan year premiums when due under Section 4007(a) of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter the "Act"). 

This Corporation is not authorized to waive interest charges on late payments. Under the circumstances, however,

no penalty will be imposed if you mail the premium payments within sixty days of the due date. 

Since your request relates to plan years beginning January 1, 1975, and since premiums "are due within 30 days after

such plan Year(s) commence", Act, Section 4007(a), your premium declaration and payment must be mailed on or before

March 31, 1975 in order to avoid late payment charges. Interest will accrue from January 31, 1975 and should be

included with your payment. 

I trust this answers your inquiry. 

George B. Driesen 

Deputy General Counsel
§ 15.60 Communications. ( a ) The Department shall take appropriate steps to effectively communicate with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The Department shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the Department. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the Department shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with a disability.
( ii ) The Department need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature to applicants or participants in programs.
( 2 ) Where the Department communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, the Department shall use telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TTYs) or equally effective telecommunication systems to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The Department shall make available to interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The Department shall post notices at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to an accessible facility, or to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the Department to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens.
( e ) In those circumstances where Department personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the Department has the burden of proving that compliance with this section would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the Secretary of Homeland Security (or his or her designee) after considering all resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the Department shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with a disability receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
#### In the Matter of Bernard Cooper, Appellant, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 490]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered October 27, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

While incarcerated at Southport Correctional Facility in Chemung County, petitioner sent a letter to his wife requesting her to send $30 to another inmate housed at the correctional facility. The letter was opened by a correction official and petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling, soliciting and violating facility correspondence procedures. He was found guilty of all charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination on procedural grounds. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

Petitioner contends that the determination must be annulled because correction officials did not obtain the authorization of the superintendent of the facility to open his mail as required by Department of Correctional Services Directive No. 4422 *(see*7 NYCRR 720.3 [e]). The evidence, however, demonstrates otherwise. The correction official who opened petitioner’s mail *1134testified that she had authorization from the superintendent, and the confidential information further established that the superintendent gave written authorization. As petitioner raises no question of substantial evidence and his other contentions either have not been preserved or are lacking in merit, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition.

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
# C_2006190EN.01003803.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/38

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 June 2006 — Nanbru v Parliament

(Case F -127/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 190/73)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following amicable settlement.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.

1

---
### **CHAPTER 55—ADJUSTABLE INTEREST RATE (LIBOR)**

Sec.
5801.
Findings and purpose.
5802.
Definitions.
5803.
LIBOR contracts.
5804.
Continuity of contract and safe harbor.
5805.
Benchmark for loans.
5806.
Preemption.
5807.
Rulemaking.