alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 27.330 Summary decision procedures. ( a ) The Presiding Officer appointed for each Proceeding shall immediately consider whether the summary adjudication of the Application for Review is appropriate based on the Application for Review, the Response, and all the supporting filings of the parties pursuant to §§ 27.310(b)(5) and 27.310(c). ( 1 ) The Presiding Officer shall promptly issue any necessary scheduling order for any additional briefing of the issue of summary adjudication on the Application for Review and Response.
( 2 ) The Presiding Officer may conduct scheduling conferences and other proceedings that the Presiding Officer determines to be appropriate.
( b ) If the Presiding Officer determines that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that one party or the other is entitled to a decision as a matter of law, then the record shall be closed and the Presiding Officer shall issue an Initial Decision on the Application for Review pursuant to § 27.340.
( c ) If a Presiding Officer determines that any factual issues require the cross-examination of one or more witnesses or other proceedings at a hearing, the Presiding Officer, in consultation with the parties, shall promptly schedule a hearing to be conducted pursuant to § 27.335.
[72 FR 17729, Apr. 9, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 41892, Aug. 4, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           11513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    65467
<ALLOWANCES>                                      7843
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                207082
<PP&E>                                          452775
<DEPRECIATION>                                  434896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  338840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           871139
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       3487912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           956728
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       37223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    338840
<SALES>                                         404979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                404979
<CGS>                                             1090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                617403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               41574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  39409
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              39409
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 282048
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     39409
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

ServiceWare Technologies, Inc. Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/
    Oxley Act - filed as an exhibit to 10-Q for Quarter Ended March 31, 2004

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ServiceWare Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Kent Heyman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Scott
Schwartzman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ Kent Heyman                                     /s/ Scott Schwartzman

Kent Heyman                                         Scott Schwartzman
Principal Executive Officer                         Principal Financial Officer
May 13, 2004                                        May 13, 2004

                                       28
Richard Cullen 

Anonjw Galuu 

COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA 

Office of tk Attorney Gencrd 

Richmond 23219 

January 12,1998 

The Honorable Michael McCabe 

Regional Administrator, Region I11 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

84 1 Chestnut Building 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19 107 

General Respoases Regarding Virginia's 

Environmental Assessment Privileee and Immunitv Law 

Dear Mr. McCabe: 

We have received EPA's September 4, 1997 letter questing information regarding 

whether Virginia's Environmental Assessment Privilege and Immunity Law (5 9 10.1 - 1 198 and 

10.1 - 1 199 of the Code of Virginia ("Code")) ("Environmental Privilegdmmunity Law") deprives 

the Commonwealth of adequate authority to enforce various requirements of our environmental 

programs that have been authonzcd, delegated, or approved by EPA or whose authorization, 

delegation, or approval by EPA is pending (collectively, "Virginia's federally authorized 

environmental programs"). With this letter, I respond to the questions presented in the CrossProgrammatic Enclosure to that letter. As explained fully below, none of Virginia's federally 

authorized environmental programs arc subject to the Environmental PrivilegeAmmunity Law. 

1. Vireinia's Environmental Privileee/Immunitv Law 

Virginia's Environmental Privilege/Immunity Law was enacted in 1995 and is found at 

9 9 lo. 1 - 1 198 and 10.1.- 1 199 of the Code. Section 10.1 - 1 198 provides a privilege that protects hm 

&sz!osurt documents and information about the content of those documents that are the product of 

a voluntary environmental assessment. Not protected by the privilege are documents or 

information (1) that are generated or developed before the commencement of a voluntary 

environmental assessment; (2) that are prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) that 

demonstrate a clear, imminent, and substantial danger to the public health or environment; or (4) 

that an nquind by law. "Document" is defined to include "field notes, records of observations, 

findings, opinions, suggestions, conclusions, drafts, memoranda, drawings, photographs, videotape, 

computer-generated or electronically recorded information, maps, charts, graphs and surveys." Any 

document submitted to the Commonwealth pursuant to its feddly authorid environmental 

programs would fall within this definition. See Cross-Programmatic Enclosure, No. 3. As 

discussed below, however, documents (and information about thc content of those documents) that 

are needed for civil and criminal enforcement of Virginia's feddy authorized environmental 

programs would not be privileged.
-  Home 
-  Transporting Infectious Substances 

# In This Section

                      -  Transporting Infectious Substances Overview 
                      -  Infectious Substance Special Permits 
                      -  COVID-19 Information 

## Contact Us

Hazardous Materials Information Center
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-4488****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922****Fax:**202-366-5713**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Safety Advisory Notice: Classification of MPXV Diagnostic Samples and Waste

PHMSA Safety Advisory Notice - Classification of MPXV Diagnostic Samples and Waste.pdf (205.11 KB)

The Safety Advisory Notice shares new advice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regarding diagnostic samples and clinical waste containing Monkeypox virus (MPXV) in Clade I or II. The advice clarifies that samples and clinical waste should be designated as Category B infectious substances except when they contain or are contaminated with cultures of Clade I MPXV. 

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
Exhibit 31.1


I, Mark E. Ellis, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of LinnCo, LLC (the “registrant”);





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;








(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 5, 2013








/s/  Mark E. EllisMark E. EllisChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
### §2270. Replacement of suspended or removed directors

If at any time, because of the suspension or removal of one or more directors pursuant to section 2264 or 2265 of this title, there shall be on the board of directors of a System institution less than a quorum of directors not so suspended, the Chairman shall appoint persons to serve temporarily as directors in their place and stead so as to establish a quorum until such time as those who have been removed are reinstated or their respective successors are duly elected and take office.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.34, as added Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §204, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1701.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective thirty days after Dec. 23, 1985, see section 401 of Pub. L. 99–205, set out as an Effective Date of 1985 Amendment note under section 2001 of this title.
#### § 109.30 How are political party committees treated for purposes of coordinated and independent expenditures?

Political party committees may make independent expenditures subject to the provisions in this subpart. *See* 11 CFR 109.36. Political party committees may also make coordinated party expenditures in connection with the general election campaign of a candidate, subject to the limits and other provisions in this subpart. *See* 11 CFR 109.32 through 11 CFR 109.34.

[69 FR 63920, Nov. 3, 2004]
#### Joshua M. Cooper v. Kings County Savings Institution.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
# C_2007096EN.01002901.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 6 March 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-351/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 96/57)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 14.10.2006.

1

---
### §4227. Unreviewed declarations; petition to pursue action as private contractor

#### (a) Notification

(1) If, pursuant to section 4226(d)(1)(B) of this title, the Attorney General notifies a declarant that the declarant's allegations have not yet been addressed, the declarant may notify the Attorney General to award a contract pursuant to subchapter III to pursue the case.

(2) A declarant's notification under paragraph (1) shall be filed with the Attorney General not later than 30 days after the date of service of notice under section 4226(d)(1)(B) of this title, and the Attorney General shall respond to the notification not later than 30 days after receipt.

#### (b) Contents of response

In response to a notification under subsection (a)(1), the Attorney General shall—

(1) grant a contract pursuant to subchapter III; or

(2) proceed with an action.

#### (c) Grant of contract

If the Attorney General decides to grant a contract, the declarant, after consultation with the Attorney General, shall have the right to select counsel to prosecute an action, and the declarant and the declarant's counsel shall act in accordance with subchapter III.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2582, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4903.)
### §213. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Jan. 30, 1934, ch. 6, §13, 48 Stat. 343, relating to ratification of acts of the President and Secretary of the Treasury, was transferred to section 824 of former Title 31, and subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.
### §2296. Increase not authorized in amounts of obligations issued, sold, or guaranteed by Federal agencies

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as authorizing an increase in the amounts of obligations issued, sold, or guaranteed by any Federal agency which issues, sells, or guarantees obligations purchased by the Bank.

(Pub. L. 93–224, §18, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 942.)
# C_2007069EN.01001202.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/12

---

Action brought on 7 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-60/07)

(2007/C 69/28)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by M. Šmerdová and L. Pignataro, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/33/EC (1) of 22 March 2004 implementing Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for blood and blood components, or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/33/EC (1) of 22 March 2004 implementing Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for blood and blood components, or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9(1) of that directive;

1

| — | order the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 8 February 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 91, 2004, p. 25.

1

---
#### § 84.001 What is the purpose of this part?

The purpose of this part is to implement the provisions of the Indian Tribal Economic Development and Contract Encouragement Act of 2000, Public Law 106-179, which amends section 2103 of the Revised Statutes, found at 25 U.S.C. 81.
§ 110.12 Candidate appearances on public educational institution premises. ( a ) *Rental of facilities at usual and normal charge.* Any unincorporated public educational institution exempt from federal taxation under 26 U.S.C. 115, such as a school, college or university, may make its facilities available to any candidate or political committee in the ordinary course of business and at the usual and normal charge. In this event, the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section are not applicable.
( b ) *Use of facilities at no charge or at less than the usual and normal charge.* An unincorporated public educational institution exempt from federal taxation under 26 U.S.C. 115, such as a school, college or university, may sponsor appearances by candidates, candidates' representatives or representatives of political parties at which such individuals address or meet the institution's academic community or the general public (whichever is invited) on the educational institution's premises at no charge or at less than the usual and normal charge, if: ( 1 ) The educational institution makes reasonable efforts to ensure that the appearances constitute speeches, question and answer sessions, or similar communications in an academic setting, and makes reasonable efforts to ensure that the appearances are not conducted as campaign rallies or events; and
( 2 ) The educational institution does not, in conjunction with the appearance, expressly advocate the election or defeat of any clearly identified candidate(s) or candidates of a clearly identified political party, and does not favor any one candidate or political party over any other in allowing such appearances.
[60 FR 64273, Dec. 14, 1995]
#### § 162.334 Is a performance bond required for a residential lease document?

We will not require a lessee or assignee to provide a performance bond or alternative form of security for a residential lease document.
### §1151. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–230, §24, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 466

Section, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title II, §201, 42 Stat. 1461, related to purpose, incorporators, articles of association and signing and filing thereof.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 11171 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Randy Hordge,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21
- CR
- 29 - 1

**_________________________ _____**  Before **Smith, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Randy Hordge has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hordge has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the recor d.

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 30, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-11171 Document: 40-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2024No. 23
- 11171

2 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non
frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2 . Case: 23-11171 Document: 40-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDWARD ADDISON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 330 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Louis Barth, Appellant, v. Morris Levy and Solomon N. Levy, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.