alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 100.136 Use of a church or a community room.

No expenditure results where an individual, in the course of volunteering personal services to any candidate or political committee of a political party, obtains the use of a church or community room and provides such room to any candidate for candidate-related activity or to any political committee of a political party for party-related activity, provided that the room is used on a regular basis by members of the community for noncommercial purposes and the room is available for use by members of the community without regard to political affiliation. A nominal fee paid by such individual for the use of such room is not an expenditure.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday March 4, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-4705 Filed 2-25-11; 3:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
§ 104.16 Audits (52 U.S.C. 30111(b)). ( a ) The Commission may conduct audits of any political committee required to register under 11 CFR part 102 and to report under 11 CFR part 104. Prior to conducting any such audit or investigation, the Commission shall conduct an internal review of reports filed by selected committees to determine whether reports filed by a particular committee meet thresholds established by the Commission for substantial compliance with the Act. Such thresholds may vary according to the type of political committee being reviewed.
( b ) The Commission may, upon affirmative vote of four members, conduct an audit and field investigation of any committee which meets the thresholds established pursuant to 11 CFR 104.16(a). All such audits and investigations shall commence within 30 days of such vote except that any audit or investigation of an authorized committee of a candidate shall be commenced within 6 months of the election for which such committee was authorized.
( c ) The Commission may, upon affirmative vote of four members, conduct an audit and field investigation of any committee pursuant to 11 CFR 111.10.
( d ) All audits and field investigations concerning the verification for and the receipt and use of payments under chapters 95 and 96 of title 26 shall be given priority over any audit or investigation of committees not receiving such payments.
### §1444. Eligibility to membership in banks

(a) Any organization organized under the laws of any State and subject to inspection and regulation under the banking or similar laws of such State shall be eligible to become a member under this chapter if—

(1) it is organized solely for the purpose of supplying credit to its members;

(2) its membership (A) is confined exclusively to building and loan associations, savings and loan associations, cooperative banks, and homestead associations; or (B) is confined exclusively to savings banks; and

(3) of the institutions to which its membership is confined which are organized within the State, its membership includes a majority of such institutions.

(b) In all respects, but subject to such additional rules and regulations as the Director may provide, any such organization shall be a member for the purposes of this chapter.

(July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §24, 47 Stat. 739; Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §701(b)(1), (3)(A), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 412; Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title II, §1204(8), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2786.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–289 substituted "the Director" for "the Board".

1989—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–73 substituted "Board" for "board".
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6344

JULIAN FORD, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(3:11-cv-00067-DCN)

Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian Ford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Julian Ford, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006); 

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Ford has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 
3

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §2134. Taxation

Each bank for cooperatives and its obligations are instrumentalities of the United States and as such any and all notes, debentures, and other obligations issued by such bank shall be exempt, both as to principal and interest from all taxation (except surtaxes, estate, inheritance, and gift taxes) now or hereafter imposed by the United States or any State, territorial, or local taxing authority, except that interest on such obligations shall be subject to Federal income taxation in the hands of the holder.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title III, §3.13, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 608; Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §205(e)(10), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1705; Pub. L. 100–233, title VIII, §805(p), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1716.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–233 inserted before period at end ", except that interest on such obligations shall be subject to Federal income taxation in the hands of the holder".

1985—Pub. L. 99–205 struck out last two sentences relating to exemption of banks for cooperatives and their property, franchises, capital, reserves, surplus, other funds, and income from Federal and non-Federal taxation except for Federal income taxation of interest on obligations of such banks and for Federal and non-Federal taxation of real and tangible personal property of such banks to same extent as similar property is taxed, and making such exemption provisions applicable only for any year or part thereof in which stock in such banks was held by the Governor of the Farm Credit Administration.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–205 effective thirty days after Dec. 23, 1985, see section 401 of Pub. L. 99–205, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
#### Vincent J. Casanova *v.*Carmel Casanova

House, C. J., Shapibo, Loiselle, MacDonald and Bogdanski, Js.

Argued April 3

decision released April 30, 1974

*David M. Reilly, Jr.,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Donald G. Walsh,*with whom, on the brief, was *William M. Mach,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff instituted a divorce action against the defendant who moved for an order for temporary alimony and support for the minor children of whom she had custody. At the hearing on the defendant’s motion, the plaintiff, in accordance with the provisions of § 380 of the Practice Book, submitted a financial affidavit which purported to set forth his assets, liabilities, income and expenses. The affidavit contained false information. It indicated that the plaintiff’s annual income was approximately $13,000. In subsequent deposition proceedings, it was determined that in fact his income for the period reported was, in fact, in excess of $24,000, and that he had not disclosed as an asset a $5000 interest in a limited partnership.

What a husband can afford to pay for support and alimony pendente lite is a material considera*305tion in the court’s determination as to what is a proper order. *England*v. England, 138 Conn. 410, 415, 85 A.2d 483. A court is entitled to rely upon the truth and accuracy of sworn statements required by § 380 of the Practice Book, and a misrepresentation of assets and income is a serious and intolerable dereliction on the part of the affiant which goes to the very heart of the judicial proceeding.

While the present appeal arises from a ruling on a motion to modify the original order which was predicated upon the false information contained in the plaintiff’s affidavit, justice to the defendant requires that she have a new and full hearing on her original motion for alimony and support, untainted by the plaintiff’s misrepresentation.

There is error, the ruling on the defendant’s motion to modify the order of temporary alimony and support is set aside, and the case is remanded for a new and full hearing on the merits of the motion.
#### § 41.7 What happens if false information is submitted?

Persons submitting or causing to be submitted any false information in connection with any application, report, or other document under this part may be subject to criminal prosecution under provisions such as sections 371 or 1001 of Title 18, U.S. Code.
# C_2006287EN.01000101.xml

| 24.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 November 2006

(2006/C 287/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2953 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 150,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4547 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67650 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0595 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5843 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,78 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5779 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,950 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 258,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6974 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8211 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4874 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,66 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 35,653 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9080 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6725 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4769 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0822 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9321 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0057 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 205,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3050 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1836 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3433 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 826,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7117 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,396 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3820 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,319 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2953

JPY

Japanese yen

150,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4547

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67650

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0595

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5843

ISK

Iceland króna

91,78

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5779

CZK

Czech koruna

27,950

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

258,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6974

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8211

RON

Romanian leu

3,4874

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,66

SKK

Slovak koruna

35,653

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9080

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6725

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4769

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0822

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9321

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0057

KRW

South Korean won

1 205,21

ZAR

South African rand

9,3050

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1836

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3433

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 826,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7117

PHP

Philippine peso

64,396

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3820

THB

Thai baht

47,319

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2007095EN.01001901.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/19

---

Action brought on 9 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-67/07)

(2007/C 95/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;
  in the alternative:
  declare that, by failing to communicate to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;

1

in the alternative:

declare that, by failing to communicate to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2004/24/EC expired on 30 October 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 136, p. 85.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Ocean Research and Resources Advisory Panel

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ocean Research and Resources Advisory Panel (ORRAP) will 
hold a meeting. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 15, 2011, from 10 
a.m. to 12 p.m. Members of the public should submit their comments in 
advance of the meeting to the meeting Point of Contact.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Consortium for Ocean 
Leadership, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Charles L. Vincent, Office of 
Naval Research, 875 North Randolph Street Suite 1425, Arlington, VA 
22203-1995, telephone 703-696-4118.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of open meeting is provided in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). 
The meeting will include discussions on ocean research, resource 
management, and other current issues in the ocean science and 
management communities; including, the review and development of 
Strategic Action Plans for the National Ocean Council.

    Dated: February 24, 2011.
D.J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-4833 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### § 256.10 When do I qualify for Category C assistance?

(a) You qualify for replacement housing assistance under Category C if you meet one of the three sets of requirements in the following table.

| You qualify for Category C assistance if . . . | And . . . | And . . . |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) You own the house in which you are living as defined in § 256.13(g)(1)-(5) | The house cannot be brought up to applicable building code standards and to standard housing condition for $60,000 or less. (For Alaska, freight cost not to exceed 100 percent of the cost of materials can be added to the cost of the project) | [No additional requirement]. |
| (2) You do not own a house | You own land that is suitable for housing | The land has adequate ingress and egress rights and reasonable access to utilities. |
| (3) You do not own a house | You have a leasehold or the ability to acquire a leasehold on land that is suitable for housing and the leasehold is undivided and for not less than 25 years at the time you receive assistance | The land has adequate ingress and egress rights and reasonable access to utilities. |

(b) If you qualify for assistance under paragraph (a) of this section, you must sign a written grant agreement stating that, if you sell the house within 10 years of assuming ownership:

(1) The grant under this part will be voided; and

(2) At the time of settlement of the sale of the house, you will repay the tribe or tribal organization that operates the HIP or BIA the full cost of the house.

(c) If you sell the house more than 10 years after you assume ownership, the following conditions apply:

(1) You may retain 10 percent of the original cost of the house per year, beginning with the eleventh year.

(2) If you sell the house after 20 years, you will not have to repay the tribe, tribal organization, or BIA.

(d) A modest house provided with Category C assistance must meet the standards in the following table.

| Number of occupants | Number of bedrooms1 | Total square footage1
(maximum) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Up to 4 persons | 2 | 1000 |
| Up to six persons | 3 | 1200 |
| 7 or more persons | 4 | 1400 |

1 Determined by the servicing housing office, based on composition of family. Total living space must comply with applicable American Disabilities Act requirements.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Patrick G. Yount, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of River Holding Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c. Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |             |  |  |  |                                         
|----- |  | ----------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: |  | May 7, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Patrick G. Yount                 
|      |  |             |  |  |  |                                         
|      |  |             |  |  |  | Patrick G. Yount Chief Financial
Officer