alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCommercial Cargo Derivative Study of the Advanced Hybrid Wing Body Configuration with Over-Wing Engine NacellesLM has leveraged our partnership with the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and NASA on the advanced hybrid wing body (HWB) concept to develop a commercial freighter which addresses the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project goals for improved efficiency beyond 2025. The current Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Revolutionary Configurations for Energy Efficiency (RCEE) program established the HWB configuration and technologies needed for military transports to achieve aerodynamic and fuel efficiencies well beyond the commercial industry's most modern designs. This study builds upon that effort to develop a baseline commercial cargo aircraft and two HWB derivative commercial cargo aircraft to quanitify the benefit of the HWB and establish a technology roadmap for further development.Document ID20170011487Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHooker, John R.*(Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. Marietta, GA, United States)*Wick, Andrew T.*(Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. Marietta, GA, United States)*Hardin, Christopher J.*(Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. Marietta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 1, 2017Publication DateNovember 1, 2017Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-26587NASA/CR-2017-219653Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL10AA06BTASK: NNL15AB18TWBS: WBS 081876.02.07.50.06.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170011487.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Steven Madden, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arvind Dharia, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The information contained
  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                          | 
|------------------------- | 
|/s/ Arvind Dharia         | 
|                          | 
|Arvind Dharia             | 
|Chief
  Financial Officer | 
|March 12,
  2008          | 

---
# C_2006331EN.01004101.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/41

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2006 — Milbert and Others v Commission

(Case T-434/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Promotion - 2003 promotion procedure - Refusal of promotion - Award of promotion points - Action for annulment - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2006/C 331/90)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Alex Milbert (Hesperange, Luxembourg), Imre Czigàny (Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium), José Manuel De la Cruz Gonzalez (Brussels, Belgium), Viviane Deveen (Overijse, Belgium), Mohammad Reza Fardoom (Roodt-sur-Syre, Luxembourg), Laura Gnemmi (Hünsdorf, Luxembourg), Marie-José Reinard (Bertrange, Luxembourg), Vassilios Stergiou (Kraainem, Belgium) and Ioannis Terezakis (Brussels) (represented by: initially G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, then F. Frabetti)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the list of officials promoted under the 2003 promotion procedure, in so far as that list does not contain the applicants' names, and, incidentally, the formal measures leading to that decision and, secondly, in the alternative, for annulment of the allocation of promotion points made under the 2003 procedure in relation to the applicants

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 8.1.2005.

1

---
-  Home 
-  171 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 171.15

## Section §171.15: Immediate notice of certain hazardous materials incidents

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 171.15 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
Exhibit 32.1 to 2007 10-Q

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of Convergys Corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2007 (the Report), I, David F. Dougherty, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ David F. Dougherty 
|David F. Dougherty     
|Chief Executive Officer

November 6, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Convergys Corporation and will be retained by Convergys Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eric J. Pulaski, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
of BindView Development Corporation (the "Company"), certify that (i) the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
the results of operations of the Company.

By /s/ ERIC J. PULASKI
   ---------------------------------------
   Eric J. Pulaski
   Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
   Officer and President
   August 13 2004

      A signed original of the foregoing certification has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Flight Checklist

LED
Motors inactive, safe to handle Low battery, automatic landing Loss of RC signal, automatic landing Pre-arm safety check failure Loss of GPS signal, switch to manual Initializing, hold the X8 level Acquiring GPS, please wait Autopilot ready, GPS locked Armed 

## Safety Button Motors active, deactivate before handling (see reverse) 

## Flight Modes Return to launch **RTL** land at the launch point Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch 

### Standard position (altitude hold mode) **STD** fly manually Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch


### Loiter mode **LTR** hover Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch 

# ! Stand back! 

# 4 6 The motors are now active. Hold left stick down right until motors spin. 

# 2 1 Power on controller; set to STD and RTL OFF. Arm motors. Press and hold safety button until solid red. Connect charged battery.

Choose a clear launch point, and face the X8 away from you. 

# 5 Check LED. 

# 3 Place the X8 at launch point. Go outside to an open area! See the Operation Manual for complete instructions.



### Auto mode **AUTO** fly a mission Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch ©2014 3D Robotics. vB. DCT0005 All rights reserved. 

### Control gimbal **TILT** tilt the camera down and up 

### Land **CH7** land at the current position Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch

Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch 

# X8+ Hold the X8 still and level while powering on.Press and hold until blinking red to deactivate.Hold left stick downleft until motors stop. 

# 1 2 Disarm motors. Press safety button. 

# 3 Disconnect battery. 

# 4 Power off controller. 

## Postflight Controller Flight Data Press and hold the DN button to access the flight data screens. Press DN again to toggle between screens.

Lower left stick below center to descend. Set left stick fully down to land when near the ground. Left Stick Left Stick Raise left stick above center to take off and gain altitude. Move left stick left and right to rotate. Use right stick to fly forward, backward, left, and right. Set left stick to center to maintain altitude. Left Stick Left Stick 

## Flight current flight mode
controller battery level (9-12 V) GPS signal strength in # of satellites meters from launch point flight battery level (14-16.8 V) connection strength current latitude current longitude altitude in meters flight time altitude in meters



### For customer support, contact us at help@3dr.com or call our support line at +1 (858) 225-1414 Monday through Friday, from 8 am to 5 pm, PST. 3DR.com/X8/info GPS status speed in m/s flight battery mAh consumed since armed **End your flight at 14.1 V.** Do not exceed 8,000 mAh for a fully charged X8+battery (80% of available capacity). 

# !
§ 39.131 What is a Language Development Program? A Language Development program is one that serves students who either: ( a ) Are not proficient in spoken or written English;
( b ) Are not proficient in any language;
( c ) Are learning their Native language for the purpose of maintenance or language restoration and enhancement;
( d ) Are being instructed in their Native language; or
( e ) Are learning non-language subjects in their Native language.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1092 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1092

   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to 
           regulation of pharmacists, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 1999

   Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to 
           regulation of pharmacists, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pharmacist's Patients Protection Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING OF REGULATION.

    Chapter IX of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
391 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 908. FUNDING.

    ``None of the funds appropriated or made available to the Food and 
Drug Administration may be used to implement--
            ``(1) the proposed rule entitled `Prescription Drug Product 
        Labeling; Medication Guide Requirements', published in the 
        Federal Register on August 24, 1995, 60 Fed. Reg. 44182 (to be 
        codified at parts 201, 208, 314, and 601, Code of Federal 
        Regulations);
            ``(2) the final rule entitled `Prescription Drug Product 
        Labeling; Medication Guide Requirements', published in the 
        Federal Register on December 1, 1998, 63 Fed. Reg. 66378 (to be 
        codified at parts 201, 208, 314, 601, and 610, Code of Federal 
        Regulations); or
            ``(3) any corresponding similar regulation or ruling 
        (including a policy statement or guideline).''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006331EN.01002504.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/25

---

Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 23 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-108/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 331/51)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

1

---
#### MICHAEL W. AMICK, JUDY J. AMICK, ROBERT V. ARONE, MARIAN B. ARONE, ROY E. BENNETT, PEGGY B. BENNETT, RALPH M. BOUNDS, CONSTANCE W. BOUNDS, BILLY D. BOWERS, CAROL L. BOWERS, ROLLA G. BRYANT, CAROL J. BRYANT, YUNG KI CHANG, SOON SUN CHANG, THOMAS EVANS, BRENDA H. EVANS, HENRY E. FERGUSON, SR., ENRICO GALLINARO, DONALD E. GOESSEL, KATHLEEN F. GOESSEL, G. TED HADDEN, ROBIN C. HADDEN, FREDRICK D. JUDSON, STEPHANIE JUDSON, DAVID C. KNOX, MARIE K. KNOX, RONALD MENICHELLI, DEBORAH L. MENICHELLI, JAMES F. NICHOLS, ELAINE NICHOLS, JEAN A. ROGERS, RANDY S. SINKOE, MARCI A. SINKOE, SIDNEY F. SOOUDI, KAZUYO K. SOOUDI, NORMAN F. STAMBAUGH, III, WILLIAM H. THURSTON, FAYE C. THURSTON, CRAWFORD B. WATSON, HAZEL J. WATSON, ROY ALLEN WILEY, KIM W. WILEY, BRUCE JOHNSON, NANCY JOHNSON, CARY LAWRENCE, GWEN LAWRENCE, FRANK FLOYD, PATRICIA FLOYD, GAILE GORDON, JOANNE GORDON, IRA BOSTIC, HELEN BOSTIC, JACKIE E. PURSER, JR., ZONE C. PURSER, EDWARD SMITH, GIRTHEL SMITH, JAMES K. BOSSBACH, SHIRLEY C. BOSSBACH, JOHN E. ARANT, AND DELORES D. ARANT v. TOWN OF STALLINGS

No. 396PA89

(Filed 10 May 1990)

On respondent Town of Stallings’ petition for discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 95 N.C. App. 64, 382 S.E.2d 221 (1989), affirming an order of *Albright, J.,*entered out of session on 16 June 1988 by consent of the parties after hearing at the 23 May 1988 Civil Session of Superior Court, UNION County, remanding an annexation ordinance to the Town pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160A-38(g)(2). Heard in the Supreme Court 9 April 1990.

*Thomas, Harrington & Biedler, by Larry E. Harrington, and Smith, Helms, Mulliss & Moore, by Larry B. Sitton, for petitionerappellees.*

*Griffin, Caldwell, Helder & Lee, P.A., by W. David Lee, for respondent-appellant Town of Stallings.*

*North Carolina League of Municipalities, by S. Ellis Hankins, General Counsel, and Kimberly L. Smith, Assistant General Counsel, amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

Discretionary review improvidently allowed.
§ 106.3 Allocation of expenses between campaign and non-campaign related travel. ( a ) This section applies to allocation for expenses between campaign and non-campaign related travel with respect to campaigns of candidates for Federal office, other than Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates who receive federal funds pursuant to 11 CFR part 9005 or 9036. (See 11 CFR 9004.7 and 9034.7) All expenditures for campaign-related travel paid for by a candidate from a campaign account or by his or her authorized committees or by any other political committee shall be reported.
( b ) ( 1 ) Travel expenses paid for by a candidate from personal funds, or from a source other than a political committee, shall constitute reportable expenditures if the travel is campaign-related.
( 2 ) Where a candidate's trip involves both campaign-related and non-campaign-related stops, the expenditures allocable for campaign purposes are reportable, and are calculated on the actual cost-per-mile of the means of transportation actually used, starting at the point of origin of the trip, via every campaign-related stop and ending at the point of origin.
( 3 ) Where a candidate conducts any campaign-related activity in a stop, the stop is a campaign-related stop and travel expenditures made are reportable. Campaign-related activity shall not include any incidental contacts.
( c ) ( 1 ) Where an individual, other than a candidate, conducts campaign-related activities on a trip, the portion of the trip attributed to each candidate shall be allocated on a reasonable basis.
( 2 ) Travel expenses of a candidate's spouse and family are reportable as expenditures only if the spouse or family members conduct campaign-related activities.
( d ) Costs incurred by a candidate for the United States Senate or House of Representatives for travel between Washington, DC, and the State or district in which he or she is a candidate need not be reported herein unless the costs are paid by a candidate's authorized committee(s), or by any other political committee(s).
( e ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the reportable expenditure for a candidate who uses government accommodations for travel that is campaign-related is the rate for comparable accommodations. The reportable expenditure for a candidate who uses a government conveyance for travel that is campaign-related is the applicable rate for a comparable commercial conveyance set forth in 11 CFR 100.93(e). In the case of a candidate authorized by law or required by national security to be accompanied by staff and equipment, the allocable expenditures are the costs of facilities sufficient to accommodate the party, less authorized or required personnel and equipment. If such a trip includes both campaign and noncampaign stops, equivalent costs are calculated in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(52 U.S.C. 30111(a)(8))
[41 FR 35944, Aug. 25, 1976, as amended at 45 FR 15117, Mar. 7, 1980; 45 FR 43387, June 27, 1980; 48 FR 5234, Feb. 4, 1983; 68 FR 69595, Dec. 15, 2003]