alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consent of Independent Accountants


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus and
Statement of Additional Information constituting parts of this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 36 to the registration statement on Form N-1A (the 'Registration
Statement") of our report dated January 19, 2001, relating to the financial
statements and financial highlights appearing in the December 31, 2000 Annual
Report to Shareholders of T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc., which is
incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement.  We also consent to
the references to us under the heading "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus
and under the heading "Independent Accountants" in the Statement of Additional
Information.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
April 24, 2001
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Mark D. Dacko the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 ****Dated: March 30, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Mark D. DackoMark D. DackoChief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00342-CR

Style: Thomas Freeman

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: February 24, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time for filing brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: November 25, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: February 14, 2014

Date Requested: March 7, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: March 7, 2014

 The Court will not grant appellant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 4, 2014
#### § 115.166 Protection of detainees from contact with alleged abusers.

Agency management shall consider whether any staff, contractor, or volunteer alleged to have perpetrated sexual abuse should be removed from duties requiring detainee contact pending the outcome of an investigation, and shall do so if the seriousness and plausibility of the allegation make removal appropriate.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1182 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1182

To authorize the use of flat grave markers to extend the useful life of 
the Santa Fe National Cemetery, New Mexico, and to allow more veterans 
         the honor and choice of being buried in the cemetery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 27, 1999

 Mr. Domenici introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the use of flat grave markers to extend the useful life of 
the Santa Fe National Cemetery, New Mexico, and to allow more veterans 
         the honor and choice of being buried in the cemetery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO USE FLAT GRAVE MARKERS AT SANTA FE NATIONAL 
              CEMETERY, NEW MEXICO.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The men and women who have served in the Armed Forces 
        have made immeasurable sacrifices for the principles of freedom 
        and liberty that make this Nation unique in all civilization.
            (2) The service of veterans has been vital to the history 
        of the Nation, and the sacrifices made by veterans and their 
        families should not be forgotten.
            (3) These veterans at the very least deserve every 
        opportunity to be buried in a National Cemetery of their 
        choosing.
            (4) The Santa Fe National Cemetery in New Mexico opened in 
        1868 and was designated a National Cemetery in April 1875.
            (5) The Santa Fe National Cemetery now has 77 acres with 
        almost 27,000 graves most of which are marked by upright 
        headstones.
            (6) The Santa Fe National Cemetery will run out of space to 
        provide for casketed burials at the end of 2000 unless Congress 
        acts to allow the use of flat grave markers to extend the 
        useful life of the cemetery until 2008.
    (b) Authority.--Notwithstanding section 2404(c)(2) of title 38, 
United States Code, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs may provide for 
flat grave markers at the Santa Fe National Cemetery, New Mexico.
                                 <all>
```
### **CHAPTER 19—SECURITY MEASURES FOR BANKS AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS**

Sec.
1881.
"Federal supervisory agency" defined.
1882.
Security measures.
1883.
Insurance rates; report to Congress.
1884.
Penalties for violations.
-  Home 
-  Regulations 

# In This Section

                      -  PHMSA Rules 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Hazardous Materials Safety Regulations (Title 49 CFR Parts 100-185)                   
                  -                                          Pipeline Safety Regulations (Title 49 CFR Parts 190-199)                   
                  -                                          Legislative Mandates                   

## Contact Us

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-4433****Fax:**202-366-3666**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# PHMSA Regulations

PHMSA is responsible for regulating and ensuring the safe and secure movement of hazardous materials to industry and consumers by all modes of transportation, including pipelines.

To minimize threats to life, property or the environment due to hazardous materials related incidents, PHMSA's Office of Hazardous Materials Safety develops regulations and standards for the classifying, handling and packaging of over 1 million daily shipments of hazardous materials within the United States.

The Office of Pipeline Safety ensures safety in the design, construction, operation, maintenance, and spill response planning of America's 2.6 million miles of natural gas and hazardous liquid transportation pipelines.

To browse interpretations, please do with the Interpretations Search.
§ 46.114 Cooperative research. ( a ) Cooperative research projects are those projects covered by this policy that involve more than one institution. In the conduct of cooperative research projects, each institution is responsible for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects and for complying with this policy.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any institution located in the United States that is engaged in cooperative research must rely upon approval by a single IRB for that portion of the research that is conducted in the United States. The reviewing IRB will be identified by the Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research or proposed by the lead institution subject to the acceptance of the Federal department or agency supporting the research.
( 2 ) The following research is not subject to this provision: ( i ) Cooperative research for which more than single IRB review is required by law (including tribal law passed by the official governing body of an American Indian or Alaska Native tribe); or
( ii ) Research for which any Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research determines and documents that the use of a single IRB is not appropriate for the particular context.
( c ) For research not subject to paragraph (b) of this section, an institution participating in a cooperative project may enter into a joint review arrangement, rely on the review of another IRB, or make similar arrangements for avoiding duplication of effort.
REVOLVING NOTE
$5,000,000

Denver, Colorado
August 13, 1997

For value received, the undersigned, FLEISCHLI OIL COMPANY, INC., a Wyoming
corporation (the "Borrower"), hereby promises to pay on the termination Date
under the Credit Agreement (defined below), to the order of NORWEST BUSINESS
CREDIT, INC., a Minnesota corporation (the "Lender"), at its main office in
Minneapolis, Minnesota, or at any other place designated at any time by the
holder hereof, in lawful money of the United States of America and in
immediately available funds, the principal sum of Five Million Dollars
($5,000,000) or, if less, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all
Revolving Advances made by the Lender to the Borrower under the Credit
Agreement (defined below) together with interest on the principal amount 
hereunder remaining unpaid from time to time, computed on the basis of the 
actual number of days elapsed and a 360-day year, from the date hereof until 
this Note is fully paid at the rate from time to time in effect under the 
Credit and Security Agreement of even date herewith (as the same may 
hereafter be amended, supplemented or restated from time to time, the 
"Credit Agreement") by and between the Lender and the Borrower. The principal 
hereof and interest accruing thereon shall be due and payable as provided in 
the Credit Agreement. This Note may be prepaid only in accordance with the 
Credit Agreement.

This Note is issued pursuant, and is subject, to the Credit Agreement, which
provides, among other things, for acceleration hereof. This Note is the
Revolving Note referred to in the Credit Agreement. This Note is secured,
among other things, pursuant to the Credit Agreement and the Security
Documents as therein defined, and may now or hereafter be secured by one or
more other security agreements, mortgages, deeds of trust, assignments or
other instruments or agreements.

The Borrower hereby agrees to pay all costs of collection, including
attorneys' fees and legal expenses in the event this Note is not paid when
due, whether or not legal proceedings are commenced.

Presentment or other demand for payment, notice of dishonor and protest are
expressly waived.

                                  FLEISCHLI OIL COMPANY, INC.

                           By /s/ Dennis R. Staal
                                  Dennis R. Staal
                                   Its Treasurer
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-3 

January 8, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4044(a) Allocation of Assets. Requirement of Following Statutory Allocation Provisions 

OPINION: 

 This is a confirmation of your recent telephone conversation with * * * of my staff and earlier conversations with

* * * of this Corporation. 

You indicated that you are representing the Plan Administrator concerning the Notice of Termination submitted on

behalf of the * * * Pension Plan. You stated that the Plan Administrator does not recognize an early retirement

entitlement as to * * * and intends to pay additional benefits to two former employees who have been paid their benefit

claims in full. 

Based on evidence presented to this Corporation, we believe that the assets allocable to * * * pursuant to the

termination procedure must be based on her status as an early retiree. Furthermore, Plan participants whose benefits

claims have been fully satisfied prior to the date of Plan termination are not to be allocated assets pursuant to Section

4044(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). 

If our understanding of your present position is correct, it would appear that you are not agreeable to allocating

assets in accord with Section 4044 of the Act. If that is not [*2] correct, please let me know immediately. You are

advised that any distributions not in accord with Section 4044 constitute violations of the Act. Unless we hear from you

within 14 days of the date of this letter, we will feel free to take appropriate action to effectuate the Plan's compliance

with the Act. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
# C_2006310EN.01001202.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/12

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2006 — Carius v Commission

(Case T-173/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Career Development Report - 2001/2002 appraisal procedure - Action for annulment - Plea of illegality - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment)

(2006/C 310/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jürgen Carius (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and M. Velardo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 21 May 2003 drawing up the definitive version of the applicant's Career Development Report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002 and, so far as necessary, of the decision of 23 December 2003 rejecting the applicant's complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 10.7.2004.

1

---
### §38. The National Bank Act

The Act entitled "An Act to provide a national currency secured by a pledge of United States bonds, and to provide for the circulation and redemption thereof," approved June 3, 1864, shall be known as "The National Bank Act."

(June 20, 1874, ch. 343, §1, 18 Stat. 123.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Bank Act, referred to in text, is act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, 13 Stat. 99. The act was incorporated into the Revised Statutes as R.S. §§324 to 327, 328 to 331, 333, 380, 563, 629, 736, 884, 885, 3473, 3475, 3651, 5133 to 5136, 5137 to 5154, 5156, 5158 to 5170, 5172, 5173, 5175, 5177, 5182 to 5184, 5187, 5189, 5190 to 5192, 5195 to 5204, 5206, 5209 to 5211, 5214 to 5215, 5219 to 5222, 5224 to 5239, 5240 to 5242, 5417, which are classified to sections 1 to 4, 8, 11 to 14, 21, 22 to 24, 26, 27, 29, 35, 39, 52, 53, 56, 57, 59 to 62, 66, 71, 72 to 76, 81, 84 to 86, 90, 91, 93, 94, 141 to 144, 161, 165, 181, 182, 192 to 194, 196, 481 to 485, 541, and 548 of this title, section 197 of Title 19, Customs Duties, and section 543 of former Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, sections 8, 333, 334, 471, 472, 656, and 1005 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and sections 507, 1348, 1394, and 1733 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### § 5.9 Preservation of records.

Each component shall preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this subpart, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code or the General Records Schedule 4.2 and/or 14 of the National Archives and Records Administration. Records will not be disposed of or destroyed while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.
### §20402. Enlisted members: standards and qualifications for retention

(a) Standards and Qualifications for Retention.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall, by regulation, prescribe—

(1) standards and qualifications for the retention of enlisted members of the Space Force; and

(2) equitable procedures for the periodic determination of the compliance of each such member with those standards and qualifications.

(b) Effect of Failure to Comply With Standards and Qualifications.—If an enlisted member serving in Space Force active status fails to comply with the standards and qualifications prescribed under subsection (a), the member shall—

(1) if qualified, be transferred to Space Force inactive status;

(2) if qualified, be retired in accordance with section 20603 of this title; or

(3) have the member's enlistment terminated.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1718(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 656.)
### [§2384. Renumbered §4753]
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3563

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Shawn Sherman, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 1, 2003 Filed: May 16, 2003

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Shawn Sherman appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 after a jury found him guilty of possessing with intent to distribute over five grams of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the District Court erred in failing to instruct the jury that it must find that-2- Sherman intended to distribute at least five grams of cocaine base as required by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). We reject this argument and affirm. The indictment charged a specific drug quantity, and the jury found Sherman guilty pursuant to instructions that referenced that quantity. As such, we find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Beckman , 222 F.3d 512, 520–21 (8th Cir. 2000) (using abuse-of-discretion standard of review to determine “whether the instructions, taken as a whole and viewed in light of the evidence and applicable law, fairly and adequately submitted the issues in the case to the jury,” and finding no abuse of discretion where district court’s instructions accurately and thoroughly provided elements and definition of crimes charged) (internal citations omitted). Even if the drug quantity had not been established in the jury instructions, Sherman’s ninety-month sentence is not subject to an Apprendichallenge because it does not exceed the twenty-year statutory maximum under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (2000) that is applicable to drug-trafficking offenses without regard to drug quantity. See United States v. Aguayo-Delgado , 220 F.3d 926, 932 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1026 (2000). Sherman also cannot rely on Apprendi to challenge the five-year statutory minimum under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). See Harris v. United States , 536 U.S. 545, 557 (2002) (explaining that Apprendi does not prohibit judges from deciding facts that increase mandatory minimum sentence). Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), including the sufficiency of the evidence, we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0001005229
<NAME>                  COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-04-1999
<CASH>                                               3,484
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      135,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        114,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   284,161
<PP&E>                                             135,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                      45,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     765,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              107,186
<BONDS>                                            426,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               147
<OTHER-SE>                                         195,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       765,339
<SALES>                                            181,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   181,601
<CGS>                                              134,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      134,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26,247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     12,833
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,394
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,394
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .45


</TABLE>