alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.1 SPECIMEN COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE






EXHIBIT 4.1




[FRONT OF STOCK CERTIFICATE]




	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	NUMBER

	 	[HOME FEDERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION LOGO]
	 	SHARES






HOME FEDERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

10,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED, $0.01 PAR VALUE

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	THIS CERTIFIES THAT	 	 	 	 	 	[SPECIMEN]	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	IS THE HOLDER OF
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 




SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF HOME FEDERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION




which are fully paid and non-assessable and which are transferable on the books of the Corporation
by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon the surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized
officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this ___day of                                          A.D.                    .




[HOME FEDERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CORPORATE SEAL]




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

PRESIDENT

	 	 	 	 

SECRETARY
	 	 






 









 








[BACK OF CERTIFICATE]




HOME FEDERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION




     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations:



	           	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 TEN COM — as tenants in common	 	UNIF
GIFT MIN ACT-                   
        	 	Custodian
	 

	 TEN ENT — as tenants by the entireties	 	                    (Cust)                    (Minor)	 	 
	 


	 JT TEN — as joint tenants with the right	 	under the Uniform Gifts to
	 	 	 	 
	 


	                    of
survivorship and not as tenants in common	 	Minors
Act                 
                          
                 
           

	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 

(State)
	 	 






     Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	For value received,	 	 	 	 	 	 	hereby sell, assign and transfer
	 	 	 	 	 
	unto	 	 	 	 	 	[PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE]
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	   
	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	   
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	  Shares
	represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
                     Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named
Corporation with the full power of substitution in the premises.






Dated                     




	 	 	 
	   
	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND
WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE
IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT
OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.






IN PRESENCE OF



 






					
	SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:
	 	 	 	 
	 	   
	 
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM),
PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.








2
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 12

- 00901

- CR

Trial Court Cause

Number: 1354971

Style: Daniel Smith

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : April 9, 2013

Type of motion: Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 20, 2012

Number of previous extensions granted: 2, most recent due date March 4, 2013

Date Requested: April 19, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale

Date: April 1 6, 2013
EX-4.1






Exhibit 4.1




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT




     AMENDMENT
NO. 2 dated as of June 11, 2008 to the Rights Agreement dated as of July 16, 1998
(the “Rights Agreement”) between Abercrombie & Fitch Co., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and National City Bank, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”).



W I T N E S S E T H




     WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Rights Agreement to extend the Final
Expiration Date of the Rights to July 16, 2018;



     WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 27 of the Rights Agreement, on June 11, 2008, the Board of
Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the Rights
Agreement effective June 11, 2008;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:



     SECTION 1. Extension of Final Expiration Date. Section 1 of the Rights
Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:



          ““Final Expiration Date” means the close of business on July 16, 2018.”




     SECTION
2. No Further Amendment. Except as expressly amended by this
Amendment, the Rights Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as the same was in effect
immediately prior to the date of this Amendment.



     SECTION 3. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without regard to any applicable conflicts of
law rules, except that the rights and obligations of the Rights Agent shall be governed by the law
of the state of New York.



     SECTION 4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto
and hereto were upon the same instrument.



[the remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]




 









 





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of
the date first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 
	ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	/s/ 	 David Cupps	 	 
	 	 
	 
	Name: 

	David Cupps	 	 
	Title:	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary






	 	 	 	 	 
	NATIONAL CITY BANK	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Pamela Fisher	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Pamela Fisher	 	 
	Title:

	 	Vice President - Shareholder Services
Order entered November 8 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00408

- CV

DAVID AND LYDIA MAIN , Appellant

V.

GILBERT ESPINOSA DBA ESPINOSA TRUCKING , Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 08276

O RDER

The reporter’s record is past due. Because appellants indicated on their
docketing statement filed with this Court that they did not request the record, we

ORDER the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. Appellants shall

file their brief on the merits within thirty days of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Sheretta
Martin, Offici al Court Reporter of the 162nd Judicial District Court, and all parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
Sales Contract between Zhejiang Yuhui and Komex Inc.



 Exhibit 10.25 
 SALES CONTRACT 
 DATE:
Jun/29/2006                       
 CONTRACT NO.: K06-10-124/E 
 SELLER: KOMEX INC. 
 #1202, VICTORIA B/D, 705-1 YEOKSAM-DONG, 
 KANONAM-KU, SEOUL, 135-709, KOREA 
 BUYER : ZHEJIANG YUHUI SOLAR ENERGY 
 NO 8, EAST RD, BAOQUN, INDUSTRY ZONE, 
 YAOZHUANG, JIASHAN, ZHEJIANG, CHINA 
 This contract is made
by and between the buyer and the seller, whereby the buyer agree to buy and the seller agree to sell the undermentioned commodity according to the terms, and conditions stipulated below: 
  

									
	 	 	 (1) GOODS AND
DESCRIPTION
	 	 (2) QTY/MONTH
	 	 (3) UNIT PRICE
	 	 (4) AMOUNT/MONTH

	 	 	 SILICON MATERIALS
	 	 	 	 EX-WORK
	 	 
	1.	 	TOP/TAIL	 	5,000KGS	 	US$160.00/KG	 	US$800,000.00
					
	2.	 	POT SCRAP	 	5,000KGS	 	US$130.00/KG	 	US$650,000.00
					
	3.	 	 BROKEN WAFER 90%
  
	 	 7,000KGS
  
	 	 US$100.00/KG
  
	 	 US$700,000.00
  

		 		 	 	 	 	 	 
		 	TOTAL	 	17,000KGS	 		 	US$2,150,000.00

 (5) PORT OF LOADING : KOREA PORT 
 (6) PORT OF DESTINATION: CHINA PORT 
 (7)
PRICE TERMS: EX-WORK 
 (8) CONTRACT PERIOD: FROM AUGUST 2006 TO DECEMBER 2007 
 (9) PAYMENT: T/T IN ADVANCE 
 * BENEFICIARY:
KOMEX INC. 
 * NAME CF BANK: SHINHAN BANK TEHERAN BR. 
 TEL. +822-566-9800 
 *
ACCOUNT NO.: 393-82-103053 
 * SWIFT CODE : SHBKKRSE 








					
	 SELLER / KOMEX INC.
	 		 	 BUYER / ZHEJIANG YUHUI SOLAR ENERGY
 SOURCE CO., LTD

			
	 /s/
	 		 	 /s/ Xianshou Li

	 C.J. SUK / PRESIDENT
	 		 	Li Xian Shou / Board Chairman
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Alan D. Gordon, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Shelley Goff, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:May 14, 2009By:/s/Alan D. GordonAlan D. Gordon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  Date:May 14, 2009By:/s/Shelley GoffShelley Goff, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
§ 5.25 Administrative appeals for access requests. ( a ) *Requirements for filing an appeal.* An individual may appeal an adverse determination denying the individual's request for access in any respect to the appropriate Appeals Officer. For the address of the appropriate component Appeals Officer, an individual may contact the applicable component FOIA Liaison using the information in appendix A to this part, visit *www.dhs.gov/foia ,* or call 1-866-431-0486. An appeal must be in writing, and to be considered timely it must be postmarked or, in the case of electronic submissions, transmitted to the Appeals Officer within 90 working days, consistent with the procedures in subpart A to this part, after the date of the component's response. An electronically filed appeal will be considered timely if transmitted to the Appeals Officer by 11:59:59 p.m. EST or EDT on the 90th working day. The appeal should clearly identify the component determination (including the assigned request number if the requester knows it) that is being appealed and should contain the reasons the requester believes the determination was erroneous. For the quickest possible handling, an individual should mark both the appeal letter and the envelope “Privacy Act Appeal” or “Judicial Redress Act Appeal.”
( b ) *Adjudication of appeals.* The DHS Office of the General Counsel, or its designee, (*e.g.,* Component Appeals Officer) is the authorized appeals authority for DHS. On receipt of any appeal involving classified information, the Appeals Officer will consult with the Chief Security Officer and take appropriate action to ensure compliance with 6 CFR part 7. If the appeal becomes the subject of a lawsuit, the Appeals Officer is not required to act further on the appeal.
( c ) *Appeal decisions.* Consistent with the procedures in subpart A to this part, the decision on an appeal will be made in writing generally twenty (20) working days after receipt. However, consistent with the procedures in subpart A to this part, the time limit for responding to an appeal may be extended provided the circumstances set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(i) are met. A decision affirming an adverse determination in whole or in part will include a brief statement of the reason(s) for the affirmance, including any Privacy Act exemption applied, and will inform the requester of the Privacy Act provisions for court review of the decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on appeal in whole or in part, the requester will be notified in a written decision and the request will be reprocessed in accordance with that appeal decision. An adverse determination by the DHS Office of the General Counsel or its designee or Component Appeals Officer will be the final action of the Department.
( d ) *Appeal necessary before seeking court review.* If an individual wishes to seek review by a court of any adverse determination or denial of a request by DHS within the allotted 20 working days to respond unless there are unusual or exceptional circumstances, that individual must first appeal it under this subpart. An appeal will not be acted on if the request becomes a matter of litigation.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.97 How can an Indian tribe or tribal organization acquire excess BIA or IHS property? ( a ) The Indian tribe or tribal organization shall submit to the appropriate Secretary a request for specific property that includes a statement of how the property is intended for use in connection with a self-determination contract or grant. The Secretary shall expeditiously process the request and shall exercise discretion in a way that gives maximum effect to the request of Indian tribes or tribal organizations for the donation of excess BIA or IHS property.
( b ) If more than one request for the same item of personal property is submitted, the Secretary shall award the item to the requestor whose request is received on the earliest date. If two or more requests are received on the same date, the Secretary shall award the item to the requestor with the lowest transportation costs. The Secretary shall make the donation as expeditiously as possible.
( c ) If more than one request for the same parcel of real property is submitted, the Secretary shall award the property to the Indian tribe or tribal organization whose reservation or trust land is closest to the real property requested.
2 

that that's appropriate," considering the instant offenses and Rios' 

criminal history. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its 

discretion at sentencing, and we 

ORDER the judgments of,eopvAtionAkFygliMED. 

Gibbons 

J. 

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge 

Washoe County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

MI I INESIMP"
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.22 For what reasons can the Secretary decline a proposal? The Secretary may only decline to approve a proposal for one of five specific reasons: ( a ) The service to be rendered to the Indian beneficiaries of the particular program or function to be contracted will not be satisfactory;
( b ) Adequate protection of trust resources is not assured;
( c ) The proposed project or function to be contracted for cannot be properly completed or maintained by the proposed contract;
( d ) The amount of funds proposed under the contract is in excess of the applicable funding level for the contract, as determined under section 106(a) of the Act; or
( e ) The program, function, service, or activity (or a portion thereof) that is the subject of the proposal is beyond the scope of programs, functions, services, or activities covered under section 102(a)(1) of the Act because the proposal includes activities that cannot lawfully be carried out by the contractor.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Exactech, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Petty, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ William Petty      
|William Petty, M. D.   
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 10, 2010
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H.
      Vance White the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
      pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
              March 29, 2006
            By:
            /s/ H.
              Vance
              WhiteH.
              Vance WhiteChief
              Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 Digital River, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands, except ratios)
 SixmonthsendedYears ended December 31,
    
    
    June 30,2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007Income (Loss) from operations as
reported
    
    $
    (916
    )
    
    $
    16,298
    
    
    $
    34,762
    
    
    $
    66,713
    
    
    $
    67,595
    
    
    $
    36,013Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    165
    
    
    
    235
    
    
    
    2,094
    
    
    
    3,092
    
    
    
    3,240
    
    
    
    1,646Earnings as defined
    
    
    (751
    )
    
    
    16,533
    
    
    
    36,856
    
    
    
    69,805
    
    
    
    70,835
    
    
    
    37,659Fixed charges
    
    $
    165
    
    
    $
    235
    
    
    $
    2,094
    
    
    $
    3,092
    
    
    $
    3,240
    
    
    $
    1,646Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    70.4
    
    
    
    17.6
    
    
    
    22.6
    
    
    
    21.9
    
    
    
    22.9
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing income (loss) from
operations plus fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest
expense, amortization of debt issuance costs and that portion of rental payments under
operating leases that we believe to be representative of interest. Earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges in 2002 by an amount equal to the net loss for
the period.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) of Vital Images, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon March 2, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Gregory S. Furness, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.               The Periodic Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  | March 2, 2004 |                                        |   | /s/ Gregory S. Furness |
|--------------|---------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|         |          | Gregory S. Furness                          |
|         |          | Chief Financial Officer  Vital Images, Inc. |

 

----
# C_2007073EN.01000801.xml

| 30.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 March 2007

(2007/C 73/07)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3352 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4499 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3370 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6215 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,24 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1020 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5807 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,035 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7096 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8697 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3640 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,381 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8598 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6506 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5487 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4322 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8713 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0274 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 256,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7745 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3171 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3906 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 187,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6124 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,357 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7020 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,160 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3352

JPY

Japanese yen

156,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4499

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67930

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3370

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6215

ISK

Iceland króna

88,24

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1020

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5807

CZK

Czech koruna

28,035

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7096

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8697

RON

Romanian leu

3,3640

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,381

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8598

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6506

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5487

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4322

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8713

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0274

KRW

South Korean won

1 256,22

ZAR

South African rand

9,7745

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3171

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3906

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 187,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6124

PHP

Philippine peso

64,357

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7020

THB

Thai baht

43,160

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---