alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Simcha Herzog, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C7 (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, TrimontReal Estate Advisors, LLC (f/k/a TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.), as TrustAdvisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, PGIM RealEstate Loan Services, Inc. (formerly known as Prudential AssetResources, Inc.), as Primary Servicer, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator on and after November 1, 2021, and Computershare TrustCompany, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for theCustodian on and after November 1, 2021.

 

 

 

 

Dated:March 22,2022

 

 

/s/ Simcha Herzog

Simcha Herzog

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
**Exhibit31.2**

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a)or 15d-14(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I,David W. Montgomery, certify that:

(1)          I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the “registrant”);

(2)          Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

(3)          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)          The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved]

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

(5)          The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: August 14, 2006

 

|   | By:    | /s/ DAVID W. MONTGOMERY |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | David W. Montgomery     |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
§ 83.22 What notice will OFA provide upon receipt of a documented petition? When OFA receives a documented petition, it will do all of the following: ( a ) Within 30 days of receipt, acknowledge receipt in writing to the petitioner.
( b ) Within 60 days of receipt: ( 1 ) Publish notice of receipt of the documented petition in the Federal Register and publish the following on the OFA Web site: ( i ) The narrative portion of the documented petition, as submitted by the petitioner (with any redactions appropriate under § 83.21(b));
( ii ) The name, location, and mailing address of the petitioner and other information to identify the entity;
( iii ) The date of receipt;
( iv ) The opportunity for individuals and entities to submit comments and evidence supporting or opposing the petitioner's request for acknowledgment within 120 days of the date of the Web site posting; and
( v ) The opportunity for individuals and entities to request to be kept informed of general actions regarding a specific petitioner.
( 2 ) Notify, in writing, the following: ( i ) The governor of the State in which the petitioner is located;
( ii ) The attorney general of the State in which the petitioner is located;
( iii ) The government of the county-level (or equivalent) jurisdiction in which the petitioner is located; and
( iv ) Notify any recognized tribe and any petitioner that appears to have a historical or present relationship with the petitioner or that may otherwise be considered to have a potential interest in the acknowledgment determination.
( c ) Publish the following additional information to the OFA Web site: ( 1 ) Other portions of the documented petition, to the extent feasible and allowable under Federal law, except documentation and information protectable from disclosure under Federal law, as identified by Petitioner under § 83.21(b) or otherwise;
( 2 ) Any comments or materials submitted by third parties to OFA relating to the documented petition;
( 3 ) Any substantive letter, proposed finding, recommended decision, and final determination issued by the Department;
( 4 ) OFA's contact list for each petitioner, including the point of contact for the petitioner; attorneys, and representatives; and
( 5 ) Contact information for any other individuals and entities that request to be kept informed of general actions regarding the petitioner.
( d ) All subsequent notices that the Department provides under this part will be provided via the most efficient means for OFA to: ( 1 ) The governor of the State in which the petitioner is located;
( 2 ) The attorney general of the State in which the petitioner is located;
( 3 ) The government of the county-level (or equivalent) jurisdiction in which the petitioner is located;
( 4 ) Any recognized tribe and any petitioner that appears to have a historical or present relationship with the petitioner or that may otherwise be considered to have a potential interest in the acknowledgment determination; and
( 5 ) Any individuals and entities that request to be kept informed of general actions regarding a specific petitioner.
### §1884. Penalties for violations

A bank or savings association which violates a rule promulgated pursuant to this chapter shall be subject to a civil penalty which shall not exceed $100 for each day of the violation.

(Pub. L. 90–389, §5, July 7, 1968, 82 Stat. 295; Pub. L. 111–203, title III, §356(3), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1547.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 struck out "and loan" after "savings".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the transfer date, see section 351 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 906 of Title 2, The Congress.
# C_2007095EN.01005002.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/50

---

Action brought on 1 march 2007 — Mülhens v OHIM — Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva (tosca de FEDEOLIVA)

(Case T-63/07)

(2007/C 95/101)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG (Köln, Germany) (represented by: D. Eickemeier, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva, A. I. E. (Jaen, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the defendant dated 18 December 2006 in Case R 761/2006-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the defendant dated 18 December 2006 in Case R 761/2006-2;

| — | reject the application of the Community trade mark No 3 467 651. |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the application of the Community trade mark No 3 467 651.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva, A. I. E.

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative Community trademark ‘tosca de FEDEOLIVA ’for goods and services in classes 16, 29, 35 and 39 Application No 3 467 651

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The community and national word marks ‘TOSCA ’for goods and services in class 3 (perfumeries, essential oils, non-medicated toilet preparations and cosmetics, preparations for hair, toothpastes, toilet soaps)

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b), 8(2)(c) and 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (‘CTMR’) and of the essential procedural requirements enshrined in Articles 43(1), 73 and 74(1)(2) of the CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 700.127 Payments for acquisition of improvements. Payments for acquisition of improvements shall be made in the following situations: ( a ) To individuals who have been denied benefits under these rules and who can prove ownership of habitations and improvements on land partitioned to the tribe of which they are not members. If the owner is deceased the payment shall be made to his or her estate. Payments under this subsection are further limited by 25 U.S.C. 640d-14(c), Pub. L. 93-531, sec. 15(c).
( b ) To individuals who have been certified as eligible for relocation benefits but who at the time of certification, own a decent, safe and sanitary dwelling as determined by the Commission pursuant to § 700.187 and who own habitation and improvements on land partitioned to the tribe of which they are not members.
Ownership shall be determined on the basis of Commission appraisal records at the time of the initial eligibility determination. (25 U.S.C. 640d, Pub. L. 93-531, 25 U.S.C. 640d-14, Pub. L. 96-305)
[49 FR 35379, Sept. 7, 1984]
# C_2006190EN.01003102.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/31

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 June 2006 — Deutsche Telekom v OHIM-PCS Systemtechnik (T-PCS)

(Case T -157/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 190/57)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 9.7.2005.

1

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1604. WILLIAM BURKE v. ROSA CHILDS et al.

Prison inmate William Burke filed a civil action against two clerks of the

Dooly County Superior Court. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss based on

official immunity, which the trial court granted. Burke now appeals directly to this

Court, but we lack jurisdiction.

Because Burke is incarcerated, his appeal is controlled by the Prison Litigation

Reform Act of 1996, OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq. Under OCGA § 42-12-8, an appeal of

a civil action filed by a prisoner “shall be as provided in Code Section 5-6-35.” And

under OCGA § 5-6-35, the party wishing to appeal must file an application for

discretionary appeal to the appropriate appellate court. Because a prisoner has no

right of direct appeal in civil cases, we lack jurisdiction to consider this direct appeal

from the trial court’s order. See Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489, 490 (480 SE2d 24)

(1997). This appeal is therefore DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 07, 2021

07/07/2021
§ 115.32 Other training. ( a ) The facility shall ensure that all volunteers and other contractors (as defined in paragraph (d) of this section) who have contact with detainees have been trained on their responsibilities under the agency's and the facility's sexual abuse prevention, detection, intervention and response policies and procedures.
( b ) The level and type of training provided to volunteers and other contractors shall be based on the services they provide and level of contact they have with detainees, but all volunteers and other contractors who have contact with detainees shall be notified of the agency's and the facility's zero-tolerance policies regarding sexual abuse and informed how to report such incidents.
( c ) Each facility shall receive and maintain written confirmation that volunteers and other contractors who have contact with immigration facility detainees have completed the training.
( d ) In this section, the term *other contractor* means a person who provides services on a non-recurring basis to the facility pursuant to a contractual agreement with the agency or facility.
§ 100.79 Unreimbursed payment for transportation and subsistence expenses. ( a ) *Transportation expenses.* Any unreimbursed payment for transportation expenses incurred by any individual on behalf of any candidate or any political committee of a political party is not a contribution to the extent that: ( 1 ) The aggregate value of the payments made by such individual on behalf of a candidate does not exceed $1,000 with respect to a single election; and
( 2 ) The aggregate value of the payments made by such individual on behalf of all political committees of each political party does not exceed $2,000 in a calendar year.
( b ) *Subsistence expenses.* Any unreimbursed payment from a volunteer's personal funds for usual and normal subsistence expenses incidental to volunteer activity is not a contribution.
§ 170.113 How can a Tribe determine whether a new use of funds is allowable? ( a ) A Tribe that proposes new uses of TTP funds must ask BIA or FHWA in writing whether the proposed use is eligible under Federal law. ( 1 ) In cases involving eligibility questions that refer to 25 U.S.C., BIA will determine whether the new proposed use of TTP funds is allowable and provide a written response to the requesting Tribe within 45 days of receiving the written inquiry. Tribes may appeal a denial of a proposed use by BIA under 25 CFR part 2. The address is: Department of the Interior, BIA, Division of Transportation, 1849 C Street NW., MS 4513 MIB, Washington, DC 20240.
( 2 ) In cases involving eligibility questions that refer to the TTP or 23 U.S.C., BIA will refer an inquiry to FHWA for decision. FHWA must provide a written response to the requesting Tribe within 45 days of receiving the written inquiry from the Tribe. Tribes may appeal denials of a proposed use by the FHWA to: FHWA, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) To the extent practical, the deciding agency must consult with the TTP Coordinating Committee before denying a request.
( c ) BIA and FHWA will: ( 1 ) Send copies of all eligibility determinations to the TTP Coordinating Committee and BIA Regional offices;
( 2 ) Coordinate all responses and if the requested agency fails to issue a decision to the requesting Tribe within the required time, the proposed use will be deemed to be allowable for that specific project; and
( 3 ) Promptly make any final determination available on agency Web sites.
1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1077

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Ricky Christian Horstman, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: July 21, 2010

Filed: July 27, 2010

___________

Before Judges BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ricky Horstman appeals the sentence the District Court1

 imposed after he

pleaded guilty to one count of possession of child pornography. His counsel has

moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), arguing that the court misapplied the Guidelines and imposed an unreasonable

sentence. Upon careful review, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we

dismiss the appeal based upon an appeal waiver contained in Horstman’s plea

agreement. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir.) (en banc)
-2-

(holding that enforcement of an appeal waiver in a plea agreement is appropriate

where the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant entered into both

the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, and enforcement

of the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 997

(2003); United States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per

curiam) (enforcing an appeal waiver in an Anders case).

______________________________
### §287. Value of shares of stock; increase and decrease of stock; member banks as shareholders; surrender of shares

The capital stock of each Federal reserve bank shall be divided into shares of $100 each. The outstanding capital stock shall be increased from time to time as member banks increase their capital stock and surplus or as additional banks become members, and may be decreased as member banks reduce their capital stock or surplus or cease to be members. Shares of the capital stock of Federal reserve banks owned by member banks shall not be transferred or hypothecated. When a member bank increases its capital stock or surplus, it shall thereupon subscribe for an additional amount of capital stock of the Federal reserve bank of its district equal to 6 per centum of the said increase, one-half of said subscription to be paid in the manner hereinbefore provided for original subscription, and one-half subject to call of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. A bank applying for stock in a Federal reserve bank at any time after the organization thereof must subscribe for an amount of the capital stock of the Federal reserve bank equal to 6 per centum of the paid-up capital stock and surplus of said applicant bank, paying therefor its par value plus one-half of 1 per centum a month from the period of the last dividend. When a member bank reduces its capital stock or surplus it shall surrender a proportionate amount of its holdings in the capital stock of said Federal Reserve bank. Any member bank which holds capital stock of a Federal Reserve bank in excess of the amount required on the basis of 6 per centum of its paid-up capital stock and surplus shall surrender such excess stock. When a member bank voluntarily liquidates it shall surrender all of its holdings of the capital stock of said Federal Reserve bank and be released from its stock subscription not previously called. In any such case the shares surrendered shall be canceled and the member bank shall receive in payment therefor, under regulations to be prescribed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, a sum equal to its cash-paid subscriptions on the shares surrendered and one-half of 1 per centum a month from the period of the last dividend not to exceed the book value thereof, less any liability of such member bank to the Federal Reserve bank.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §5, 38 Stat. 257; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), title III, §319(a), 49 Stat. 704, 713.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1935—Act Aug. 23, 1935, §319(a), amended last four sentences.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.