alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 29—HOME MORTGAGE DISCLOSURE**

Sec.
2801.
Congressional findings and declaration of purpose.
2802.
Definitions.
2803.
Maintenance of records and public disclosure.
2804.
Enforcement.
2805.
Relation to State laws.
2806.
Compliance improvement methods.
2807.
Report.
2808.
Effective date.
2809.
Compilation of aggregate data.
2810.
Disclosure by Secretary; commencement, scope, etc.
2811.
Repealed.
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 28, 2017

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-2 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Ron TremblayName:

Ron TremblayTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2017




---

<for SEMT 2012-2>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
March 29, 2012 (the Agreement).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ibl-IS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 10-14-00226-CR

Poss With Intent to Deliver a

OFFENSE: Controlled Substance

Stephen Kenneth Lane Sellers v. The State

STYLE: of Texas COUNTY: McLennan

TRIAL COURT: 19th District Court

TRIAL COURTS: 2013-2242-C1

TRIAL COURTJUDGE: Hon. RalphT. Strother

DISPOSITION: Affirmed

DATE: May 7, 2015

Appellant's MOTION

JUSTICE: Chief Justice Gray PC

PUBLISH: DNP7

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APP BR:

September 15, 2014

August 25, 2014

March 27, 2015

December 5, 2014

FOR REHEARING IS: Denied

DATE: June 4, 2015

JUDGE: Chief Justice Gray

SUPPCLKRECORD:

SUPPRPTRECORD:

SUPP BR:

PROSE BR:

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

hPPtLf^/JT^S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

T&M

DATE: O^/M/^O/S"

JUDGE:

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA# 1M-1S

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:
#### § 27.100 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to enhance the security of our Nation by furthering the mission of the Department as provided in 6 U.S.C. 111(b)(1) and by lowering the risk posed by certain chemical facilities.

[72 FR 17729, Apr. 9, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 41890, Aug. 4, 2021]
### §2126. Retirement of stock

Nonvoting investment stock and participation certificates may be called for retirement at par. With the approval of the issuing bank, the holder may elect not to have the called stock or participation certificates retired in response to a call, reserving the right to have such stock or participation certificates included in the next call for retirement. Voting stock may also be retired at par, on call or on such revolving basis as the board may determine with due regard for its total capital needs: Provided, however, That all equities in the banks issued or allocated with respect to 1971 and prior years shall be retired on a revolving basis according to the year of issue with the oldest outstanding equities being first retired. Equities issued for subsequent years shall not be called or retired until equities described in the preceding sentence of this proviso have been retired.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title III, §3.5, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 604; Pub. L. 96–592, title III, §303, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3444; Pub. L. 99–205, title II, §205(e)(6), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1705; Pub. L. 100–233, title VIII, §802(p), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1712; Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(6), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4679.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 struck out "district" before "banks issued or allocated".

1988—Pub. L. 100–233 struck out "with approval of the Farm Credit Administration" after "board may determine".

1985—Pub. L. 99–205 substituted "Nonvoting investment stock" for "Any nonvoting stock held by the Governor of the Farm Credit Administration shall be retired to the extent required by section 2151(b) of this title before any other outstanding voting or nonvoting stock or participation certificates shall be retired except as may be otherwise authorized by the Farm Credit Administration. When those requirements have been satisfied, nonvoting investment stock", and substituted "Voting" for "When the requirements of section 2151(b) of this title have been met, voting".

1980—Pub. L. 96–592 inserted provisions respecting applicability to participation certificates and struck out provisions relating to maximum amount of fair book value at retirement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–205 effective thirty days after Dec. 23, 1985, see section 401 of Pub. L. 99–205, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Publications             
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeOur AgencyLeadershipWoodrow G. Kusse

**Woodrow G. KussePentagon Force Protection Agency Chief of Pentagon Police**

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

     CP Financing Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (wholly-owned)
     Great Lakes Industrial Partners, L.P., an Indiana limited partnership
     CenterPoint O'Hare L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability company
     The Miller Partnership L.P., an Illinois limited partnership
     East Chicago Partners, L.P., an Indiana limited partnership
     Elk Grove Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership
     The Edge Venture, an Illinois general partnership
     CenterPoint Realty Services Corporation, an Illinois corporation
     CenterPoint Properties, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
     CenterPoint Equipment Capital Corporation, an Illinois corporation
     CenterPoint Development Corporation, an Illinois corporation
     CenterPoint Realty Management Corporation, an Illinois corporation
     CenterPoint Resources Corporation, an Illinois corporation
     CenterPoint Capital Funding, L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability company
     CP Realty Management Co. I, an Illinois corporation
     CenterPoint Venture, L.L.C, a Delaware limited liability company
     CP Financing Corporation II, an Illinois corporation
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-2 

November 27, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 3(16) Definitions. Administrator 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your recent letter and subsequent telephone conversation with a member of our staff

requesting an opinion on the following question: Who is the plan sponsor in a situation where there exists one plan to

which several employers ("agencies") contribute and in which the plan administrator * * * is the custodian of the Plan

documents? 

Section 3(16)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act provides that the plan sponsor is, "in the case

of a plan established or maintained by two or more employers or jointly by one or more employers . . ., the association,

committee, joint board of trustees, or other similar group of representatives of the parties who establish or maintain the

plan." Accordingly, * * * appears to be the sponsor of the plan in addition to its capacity of plan administrator. 

We hope this guidance is of assistance in fulfilling your obligations under the Act.
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank** (the "Servicer").

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR''). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions").

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on 'the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 18, 2016
# C_2007082EN.01002902.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 February 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Entidad de Gestión de Derechos de los Productores Audiovisuales (Egeda) v Al Rima, S.A

(Case C-395/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/64)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 2.12.2006.

1

---
### §3335. Powers of Appraisal Subcommittee

The Appraisal Subcommittee may, for the purpose of carrying out this chapter, establish advisory committees, hold hearings prescribe 1 regulations in accordance with chapter 5 of title 5 (commonly referred to as the Administrative Procedures Act) after notice and opportunity for comment,,2 sit and act at times and places, take testimony, receive evidence, provide information, and perform research, as the Appraisal Subcommittee considers appropriate. Any regulations prescribed by the Appraisal Subcommittee shall (unless otherwise provided in this chapter) be limited to the following functions: temporary practice, national registry, information sharing, and enforcement. For purposes of prescribing regulations, the Appraisal Subcommittee shall establish an advisory committee of industry participants, including appraisers, lenders, consumer advocates, real estate agents, and government agencies, and hold meetings as necessary to support the development of regulations.

(Pub. L. 101–73, title XI, §1106, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 512; Pub. L. 111–203, title XIV, §1473(d), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2191.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title XI of Pub. L. 101–73, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title XI to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 inserted "prescribe regulations in accordance with chapter 5 of title 5 (commonly referred to as the Administrative Procedures Act) after notice and opportunity for comment," after "hold hearings" and "Any regulations prescribed by the Appraisal Subcommittee shall (unless otherwise provided in this chapter) be limited to the following functions: temporary practice, national registry, information sharing, and enforcement. For purposes of prescribing regulations, the Appraisal Subcommittee shall establish an advisory committee of industry participants, including appraisers, lenders, consumer advocates, real estate agents, and government agencies, and hold meetings as necessary to support the development of regulations." at the end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the date on which final regulations implementing that amendment take effect, or on the date that is 18 months after the designated transfer date if such regulations have not been issued by that date, see section 1400(c) of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 1601 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by a comma.

2 So in original.
### §32. Liabilities and suits as affected by change of name or location

Nothing contained in sections 30 and 31 of this title shall be so construed as in any manner to release any national banking association under its old name or at its old location from any liability, or affect any action or proceeding in law in which said association may be or become a party or interested.

(May 1, 1886, ch. 73, §4, 24 Stat. 19.)
# C_2006310EN.01002702.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/27

---

Action brought on 6 November 2006 — Hartmann v OHIM (E)

(Case T-302/06)

(2006/C 310/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft (Heidenheim, Germany) (represented by K. Gründig-Schnelle, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the contested decision |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the proceedings |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the proceedings

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘E’ for goods in Classes 5, 10 and 25 — Application No 4 316 949

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
Executive Incentive Plan for the year ended March 31, 2009



 Exhibit 10.46 
 Executive Incentive Plan for Fiscal 2008 
 On May 15, 2008, the Committee, as well as the
Board of Directors of the Company, approved an executive incentive plan for the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2009 (fiscal 2008). Participants in the plan include the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and all other executive
officers. The Committee is responsible for determining the payout under the plan to each executive officer except the Chief Executive Officer. The Board of Directors of the Company determines the payout under the plan for the Chief Executive
Officer, taking into account the recommendation received from the Committee. 
 Pursuant to the plan, the Committee designated for each
executive officer a target cash incentive amount, expressed as a percentage of the officer’s base salary. In establishing these targets, the Committee took into account for each officer the level of total compensation including base salary,
cash incentive and equity paid by similar companies for comparable positions based on market data compiled by our Vice President of Human Resources. 
 The amount of the incentive award actually paid to each executive officer may be less than or greater than the executive’s target cash incentive, with the amount capped at 156% of the target incentive. Individual
incentive awards will be determined following the end of fiscal 2008 based on the following factors and their corresponding weightings: 
  

	 	•	 	 the Company’s earnings before interest, other income (expense), taxes, depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation (EBITDAS) for fiscal 2008 as
compared to the target established by the Committee – 40% 


  

	 	•	 	 the executive’s achievement of individual, measurable objectives during fiscal 2008 as determined by the Committee for all executives with the exception of the
Chief Executive Officer, who is evaluated by the Board of Directors – 40% 


  

	 	•	 	 the executive’s overall contribution during fiscal 2008 towards the achievement of the Company’s financial and non-financial objectives – 20%



 The following table sets forth each current executive officer’s target cash incentive for fiscal 2008. 

 

									
	 Executive Officer
	  	 Title
	  	Target Incentive as % of
Base Salary	 	 	Target Incentive
	Gregory J. Yurek	  	Chief Executive Officer and President	  	60	%	 	$	345,000
				
	Charles W. Stankiewicz	  	Executive Vice President, AMSC Power Systems	  	50	%	 	$	150,000
				
	David A. Henry	  	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary	  	50	%	 	$	135,000
				
	Daniel P. McGahn	  	Senior Vice President and General Manager, AMSC Superconductors and Asia Pacific	  	50	%	 	$	122,500
				
	Angelo R. Santamaria	  	Vice President, Global Manufacturing Operations	  	50	%	 	$	105,000
				
	Timothy D. Poor	  	Vice President, Global Sales and Business Development	  	50	%	 	$	100,000
				
	Alexis P. Malozemoff	  	Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer	  	35	%	 	$	82,250
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 

November 15, 2021 
 Weston M. Hicks 

[Redacted] 
 Re: Restricted Stock Unit and Performance Share
Vesting 
 Dear Weston: 
 Reference is
hereby made to (i) the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement by and between Alleghany Corporation (the “Company”) and you dated as of January 15, 2019 (the “RSU Agreement”), and (ii) the Performance
Share Award Agreements by and between the Company and you dated as of February 21, 2018, January 15, 2019, January 21, 2020 and January 19, 2021 (the “PSU Agreements”). 

We are pleased to inform you that, in connection with and subject to your retirement from the Company on December 31, 2021 (the
“Retirement Date”) and in further recognition of your contributions to the Company, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that, effective as of the Retirement Date, (i) you shall
become vested in, and have a non-forfeitable right to, 1,562 of the Credited Units granted to you pursuant to the RSU Agreement, and (ii) the accelerated vesting provisions of Section 5(b) of the PSU
Agreements shall apply to your retirement from the Company on the Retirement Date determined based on the achievement of “Adjusted Book Value Per Common Share” as of December 31, 2021. 

Payment of your vested restricted stock units and performance shares will be made in accordance with the RSU Agreement and the applicable PSU
Agreements. All unvested restricted stock units and performance shares (after giving effect to the foregoing acceleration of vesting) shall be automatically forfeited for no consideration on the Retirement Date. 

If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please return a signed and dated copy of this letter to Christopher K. Dalrymple by
December 31, 2021. 
  

	
	 Sincerely,

	
	 /s/ Raymond L.M. Wong

	
	 Raymond L.M. Wong



  

	
	 /s/ Weston M. Hicks

	 Weston M. Hicks
# C_2006310EN.01003202.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/32

---

Action brought on 30 October 2006 — Mangazzù v Commission

(Case F-126/06)

(2006/C 310/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Salvatore Mangazzù (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the individual decision concerning a transfer from temporary staff status to official status contained in an instrument of appointment taking effect on 1 January 2005, notified on 13 January 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the individual decision concerning a transfer from temporary staff status to official status contained in an instrument of appointment taking effect on 1 January 2005, notified on 13 January 2006;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, after having worked at the Commission for several years as a temporary agent in Grade A5, then A*11, was successful in open competition COM/A/18/04, published on 21 April 2004, to draw up a reserve list for administrators in career bracket A7/A6. As a result, he was appointed as an official in the same post he had occupied as a member of the temporary staff and classified in Grade A*6, step 2, in accordance with Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations.

In support of his action, the applicant invokes infringement of Articles 31 and 62 of the Staff Regulations and Articles 5 and 2 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.

The applicant moreover submits infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations, the principle of the protection of acquired rights and the principle of equal treatment.

---