alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006326EN.01000902.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Madrid — Spain) — Elisa María Mostaza Claro v Centro Móvil Milenium SL

(Case C-168/05) (1)

1

(Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Failure to raise the unfair nature of a term during arbitration proceedings - Possibility of raising that objection in the context of an action brought against the arbitration award)

(2006/C 326/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elisa María Mostaza Claro

Applicant:

Defendant: Centro Móvil Milenium SL

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Audiencia Provincial de Madrid — Interpretation of Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of, and point 1(q) of the annex to, Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) — Adequate and effective means to prevent the use of unfair terms — Invalidity of an arbitration agreement not pleaded by the consumer during the arbitration proceedings

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a national court seised of an action for annulment of an arbitration award must determine whether the arbitration agreement is void and annul that award where that agreement contains an unfair term, even though the consumer has not pleaded that invalidity in the course of the arbitration proceedings, but only in that of the action for annulment.

---

(1)  OJ C 155 of 25.6.2005.

1

---
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement  dated as of August1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, adivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. BankNational Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asOperating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2012-CCRE2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 Pursuant toSection 10.11 of this Agreement, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President ofCommercial Mortgage Services and Timothy S. Ryan, Managing Director of CustomerRelationship Management do hereby certify that:

 1. A review of the activities of theMaster Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31,2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement duringsuch period has been made under my supervision, and

 2. To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

/s/Timothy S. Ryan

TimothyS. Ryan

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### Grant Blass, Respondent, v. Joseph J. Slocum, as Receiver of the Poughkeepsie and Eastern Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
### §2158. Purchase and sale by Federal Reserve System

Any member of the Federal Reserve System may buy and sell bonds, debentures, or other similar obligations issued under the authority of this chapter and any Federal Reserve bank may buy and sell such obligations to the same extent and subject to the same limitations placed upon the purchase and sale by said banks of State, county, district, and municipal bonds under section 355 of this title.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.7, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 612.)
### §2147. Patronage pools

Under such terms and conditions as may be determined by its board of directors, the consolidated bank may—

(1) for a period of at least 3 years following January 6, 1988, establish separate patronage pools consisting of loans to eligible borrowers located in each constituent farm credit district (as such district existed on January 6, 1988); and

(2) allocate revenues, expenses, and net savings among such pools on an equitable basis.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title III, §3.26, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §415(2), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1644.)
# C_2007082EN.01000302.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 February 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) — Centro Equestre da Lezíria Grande Lda v Bundesamt für Finanzen

(Case C-345/04) (1)

1

(Freedom to provide services - Tax legislation - Corporation tax - Equestrian presentations and lessons organised in a Member State by a company established in another Member State - Deduction of operating expenses - Conditions - Direct economic connection to income received in the State in which the activity is pursued)

(2007/C 82/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Centro Equestre da Lezíria Grande Lda

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesamt für Finanzen

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Whether national legislation relating to income tax payable by non-residents which provides that tax is to be repaid where operating expenses which have a direct economic connection to income are higher than half of the income is compatible with Article 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) does not preclude national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings in so far as that legislation makes repayment of corporation tax deducted at source on the income of a taxpayer with restricted tax liability subject to the condition that the operating expenses in respect of which a deduction is claimed for that purpose by that taxpayer have a direct economic connection to the income received from activities pursued in the Member State concerned, on condition that all the costs that are inextricably linked to that activity are considered to have such a direct connection, irrespective of the place and time at which those costs were incurred. By contrast, that article precludes such national legislation in so far as it makes repayment of that tax to that taxpayer subject to the condition that those same operating expenses exceed half of that income.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 6.11.2004.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1218 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1218

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2000

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue to the Landusky School 
 District, without consideration, a patent for the surface and mineral 
            estates of certain lots, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That subject to valid 
existing rights, the Secretary of the Interior shall issue to the 
Landusky School District, without consideration, a patent for the 
surface and mineral estates of approximately 2.06 acres of land as 
follows: T.25 N, R.24 E, Montana Prime Meridian, section 27 block 2, 
school reserve, and section 27, block 3, lot 13.

            Passed the Senate April 13, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
### §4209. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–273, div. A, title III, §301(c)(3), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1781

Section, Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2569, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4898, related to Financial Institution Information Award Fund.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOS International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis LaVorgna, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\ Dennis LaVorgnaDennis LaVorgnaChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 18, 2007

---
# C_2007082EN.01005402.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/54

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 1 March 2007 — Fardoom and Ashbrook v Commission

(Case F-72/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Reimbursement of expenses - Mission expenses - Refusal to sign the travel orders requested in the context of union activities - Interest in bringing an action - Inadmissibility)

(2007/C 82/114)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Mohammad Reza Fardoom (Roodt-sur-Syre, Luxembourg) and Michael Ashbrook (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: initially G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, then F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission's decision not to sign the travel orders requested by the applicants in the context of their union activities

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 229 of 17.9.2005 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities as Case T-291/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
### §4244. Contract provisions

A contract made with a private counsel under section 4241 of this title shall include—

(1) a provision permitting the Attorney General to terminate either the contract or the private counsel's representation of the United States in particular cases if the Attorney General finds that such action is in the best interests of the United States;

(2) a provision requiring private counsel to transmit monthly to the Attorney General a report on the services relating to matters handled pursuant to the contract during the preceding month and the progress made during that period; and

(3) a provision requiring that the initiation, settlement, dismissal, or compromise of a claim be approved by a duly appointed officer of the United States.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2591, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4906.)
#### § 100.4 Federal office (52 U.S.C. 30101(3)).

*Federal office* means the office of President or Vice President of the United States, Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress of the United States.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-3 (Nos. 333-106328 and 333-114078) and Form S-8 (Nos.333-26797, 333-30771, 333-39213, 333-39189, 333-69761, 333-69765, 333-93413,333-93407, 333-67790, 333-97891, 333-111253 and 333-125139) of VitalImages, Inc. of our report dated April 29, 2005 relating to management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K/A.

 

 
| /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|---------------------------------|
| Minneapolis,  Minnesota         |
| August  5, 2005                 |

 

 

1

----
§ 158.701 Deployment program. ( a ) *Deployment program.* The Secretary or designee establishes and administers a deployment program to: ( 1 ) Guide when the Department uses CTMS to recruit and retain individuals possessing CTMS qualifications; and
( 2 ) Operationalize aspects of the work valuation system, the talent acquisition system and the compensation system, described in §§ 158.404, 158.501, and 158.602 respectively.
( b ) Under the deployment program, the Department: ( 1 ) Designates qualified positions as described in § 158.702;
( 2 ) Designates and staffs assignments as described in § 158.703;
( 3 ) Determines and documents a DHS-CS employee's official worksite as described in § 158.704;
( 4 ) Administers a work scheduling system as described in § 158.705; and
( 5 ) Performs necessary recordkeeping as described in § 158.706.
#### Patrick O’Connell, as Administrator, etc., of Patrick O’Connell, Deceased, Respondent, v. Merchants’ Refrigerating Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1157 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1157

          To repeal the Davis-Bacon Act and the Copeland Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 27, 1999

Mr. Smith of New Hampshire (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. 
  Nickles, Mr. Helms, and Mr. Cochran) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To repeal the Davis-Bacon Act and the Copeland Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAVIS-BACON ACT.

    (a) Repeal.--The Act of March 3, 1931 (40 U.S.C. 276a et seq.) 
(commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act) is repealed.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law to a wage requirement of 
the Act of March 3, 1931, shall after the date of the enactment of this 
Act be null and void.

SEC. 2. COPELAND ACT.

    Section 2 of the Act of June 13, 1934 (40 U.S.C. 276c) (commonly 
referred to as the ``Copeland Act'') is repealed.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by sections 1 and 2 shall take effect 30 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act but shall not affect any 
contract in existence on such date of enactment or made pursuant to 
invitation for bids outstanding on such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50781 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LEONCIO ARANGO-GONZALEZ, also known as Leonicio Arango-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-44

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Leoncio ArangoGonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 11073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4596]



[[Page 11071]]

Vol. 76

Monday,

No. 39

February 28, 2011

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of February 24, 2011--Continuation of the National Emergency 
With Respect to Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the 
Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 11073]]

                Notice of February 24, 2011

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating 
                to the Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of 
                Vessels

                On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national 
                emergency was declared to address the disturbance or 
                threatened disturbance of international relations 
                caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the 
                Cuban government of two unarmed U.S.-registered 
                civilian aircraft in international airspace north of 
                Cuba. On February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, the 
                national emergency was extended and its scope was 
                expanded to deny monetary and material support to the 
                Cuban government. The Cuban government has not 
                demonstrated that it will refrain from the use of 
                excessive force against U.S. vessels or aircraft that 
                may engage in memorial activities or peaceful protest 
                north of Cuba. In addition, the unauthorized entry of 
                any U.S.-registered vessel into Cuban territorial 
                waters continues to be detrimental to the foreign 
                policy of the United States. Therefore, in accordance 
                with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 
                U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency 
                with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority 
                relating to the regulation of the anchorage and 
                movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867 as 
                amended by Proclamation 7757.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 24, 2011.

[FR Doc. 2011-4596
Filed 2-25-11; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3195-W1-P
# C_2007116EN.01000602.xml

| 26.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4609 — Shell/Coller Capital/STV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 116/04)

On 29 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4609. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4609. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
# C_2006294EN.01003604.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/36

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-18/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/67)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.03.2006.

1

---