alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-28 

February 24, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(1). Plans covered. Individual Account Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your January 22, 1976 letter requesting a determination as to whether "the above-named

Plan * * * /is exempt from payment of the [Title IV] insurance premium. * * *" 

A careful examination of the Plan reveals that it provides benefits on the basis of the amounts that have been

contributed to a participant's account and the gains and losses that have been allocated to that account. However, the

Plan also has a defined benefit feature; it provides for a benefit that is not determined on the basis of the amounts in

an individual's account. I should like to draw your attention to page twelve of the Restated Plan which states that: 

* * * "PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the dollar value of a M ember's vested interest in his terminal balance shall

not be less than the actuarial value of the Member's vested deferred retirement income to which the Member would

have been entitled under the Prior Plan at the date of termination of employment." 

Since the above quoted section of the Plan provides for a minimum benefit that is not determined by the amount

that is in a participant's account upon retirement or termination of employment, [*2] the Plan cannot be considered

an "individual account plan" and the premiums imposed by Title IV must be paid. 

Should you have any further questions on this matter, please feel free to call me. I hope you've recovered from

the blizzard and the flu.
#### Walter A. Runck et al. *v.*Town Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Hamden et al.

(No. 87436)

*Dennis N. Garvey,*trustee, for the defendant Landmarks Holding Corporation et al.

*Peter G. Dorsey,*town attorney, for the named defendant and the town of Hamden.

Argued June 4

decided June 4, 1974

The defendants’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County is granted.
### §303. Qualifications and disabilities

No Senator or Representative in Congress shall be a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or an officer or a director of a Federal reserve bank.

No director of class B shall be an officer, director, or employee of any bank.

No director of class C shall be an officer, director, employee, or stockholder of any bank.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §4 (pars.), 38 Stat. 255; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of pars. 13 to 15 of section 4 of act Dec. 23, 1913. For classification to this title of other pars. of section 4, see Codification note set out under section 301 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
### §1748c. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–117, title XI, §1108(aa), Aug. 10, 1965, 79 Stat. 507

Section, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title VIII, §804, as added Aug. 8, 1949, ch. 403, §1, 63 Stat. 575; amended Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title IV, §401, 69 Stat. 650, provided for disposition and use of excess moneys in Armed Services Housing Mortgage Insurance Fund, issue and cancellation of debentures, and receipt and payment of credits and charges.
Exhibit 13.1

GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

I, Emilio Azcárraga Jean, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (the
Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2012



By:

/s/ Emilio Azcárraga JeanName: Emilio Azcárraga Jean Title: Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Philip Kirkland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 19, 2013
By:
/s/ Philip KirklandPhilip Kirkland

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007069EN.01001902.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/19

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 17 January 2007 — Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret and Akar v Commission

(Case T-129/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Essential procedural requirements - Natural and legal persons required to be represented by a lawyer entitled to practise before a court of a Member State - Application in proper form lodged out-of-time - Inadmissibility of the action)

(2007/C 69/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar (Ankara, Turkey) (represented by: Ç. Şahin, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. van Nuffel and F. Hoffmeister, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for, first, annulment of Decision MK/KS/DELTUR/(2005)/SecE/D/1614 of 23 December 2005 concerning the award of a public works contract for the construction of educational establishments in the Provinces of Siirt and Diyarbakir (EuropeAid/121601/C/W/TR) and, second, suspension of the procedure in question.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicants, Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar, shall bear their own costs and, jointly and severally, pay the Commission's costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants, Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar, shall bear their own costs and, jointly and severally, pay the Commission's costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.

1

---
Agreement and Release with Lauri Shanahan dated March 20, 2008.



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AGREEMENT AND RELEASE 
 The Gap Inc. (“Company”) and Lauri M. Shanahan
(“Executive”) have agreed that Executive’s employment as Chief Legal and Administrative Officer will terminate effective March 31, 2008 and that Executive would be eligible for certain compensation and benefits under the
Termination/Severance section of the letter agreement (“Agreement”) between Executive and the Company dated March 16, 2007 and as amended, as long as certain conditions in the Agreement are met, including Executive’s execution of
the release of claims as follows: 
 1. Additional Consideration 
 As additional consideration for the promises Executive makes herein, the Company will pay Executive the gross sum of $50,000, less taxes. Such payment
will be made no later than April 7, 2008. 
 2. Release of Claims 
 Executive hereby releases and forever discharges the Company, its subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, agents and employees, from any and all
claims, liabilities and obligations, of every kind and nature, whether now known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, which Executive ever had, or now has, with the exception of claims that cannot be legally waived. This release includes all
federal and state statutory claims, federal and state common law claims (including those for contract and tort), and claims under any federal or state anti-discrimination statute or ordinance, including but not limited to, Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (as amended), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 42 U.S.C. sections 1981 and 1983, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the California Constitution, the California Fair
Employment and Housing Act, the California Unfair Competition Act (California Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq.), the California Unruh Act, and the California Labor Code. Executive expressly waives the protection of
Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California, which states: 
 “A general release does not extend to claims which the
creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected the settlement with the debtor.” 
 This is a legally binding release. Executive is advised to consult with an attorney prior to signing this Release. Executive has 21 days to consider this
Release. Within seven days of signing this Release, Executive may revoke this Release by notifying the Company in writing that Executive revokes it. Executive is also advised to seek her own financial and tax consultants related to the compensation
and benefits described in the Agreement. 
  

	
	Agreed to this 20th day of March, 2008
	
	/S/ LAURI SHANAHAN
	Lauri M.Shanahan
#### In the Matter of George Lunney, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 317]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

*956Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of controlled substances after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Inasmuch as the misbehavior report and the positive test results, together with the testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt, the determination will not be disturbed *(see Matter of Hayes v Goord,*26 AD3d 546 [2006]; *Matter of Molina v Selsky,*21 AD3d 1238, 1238-1239 [2005]). The testimony of the facility nurse and the correction officer who performed the test refuted petitioner’s claim that certain medications he had received caused a false positive test result, thus creating a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Figueroa v Goord,*15 AD3d 705, 706 [2005]; *Matter of Vourderis v Selsky,*4 AD3d 667, 668 [2004]).

Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim of ineffective employee assistance, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit.

Spain, J.P, Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
§ 13.24 Protective order. ( a ) A party or a prospective witness or deponent may file a motion for a protective order with respect to discovery sought by an opposing party or with respect to the hearing, seeking to limit the availability or disclosure of evidence.
( b ) In issuing a protective order, the ALJ may Make any order that justice requires to protect a party or Person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: ( 1 ) That the discovery not be had;
( 2 ) That the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place;
( 3 ) That the discovery may be had only through a method of discovery other than that requested;
( 4 ) That certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope of discovery be limited to certain matters;
( 5 ) That discovery be conducted with no one present except Persons designated by the ALJ;
( 6 ) That the contents of discovery or evidence be sealed;
( 7 ) That a deposition after being sealed be opened only by order of the ALJ;
( 8 ) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, commercial information, or facts pertaining to any criminal investigation, proceeding, or other administrative investigation not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way; and
( 9 ) That the parties simultaneously submit to the ALJ specified Documents or information enclosed in sealed envelopes to be opened as directed by the ALJ.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-33 

March 5, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043(b)(8) Reportable Events. Mergers, Consolidations & other Transfers of Plan Assets 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of February 10, 1976. You indicate that four corporations are merging into two

corporations and that, subsequently, the single employer, defined benefit plans of each of the corporations are merging

into two plans. That is, the assets and liabilities of the merging corporations' plans are being transferred into a single plan

to be maintained by the resultant single corporation. You ask whether this constitutes a reportable event or plan

termination under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). We assume that the

plans are covered by § 4021 of the Act. 

As * * * of my staff indicated by telephone on February 27, 1976, there appear to be two plan mergers reportable

under § 4043 (b) (8) of the Act. Accordingly, notices must be submitted of the Office of Program Operations - Division

of Plan Review of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") whithin 30 days after the plan administrator

knows or has reason to know of the events' occurrences. But the mergers described in your letter and on the telephone

to * * * do [*2] not constitute "terminations" under Title IV of the Act. 

We hope this is of assistance. Enclosed, pursuant to your discussion with * * * is a copy of the Notice of Intent to

Terminate Regulation. 

George B. Driesen 

Deputy General Counsel
-  Home 

## Contact Us

Hazardous Materials Training Program
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**Training@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4900****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922****Fax:**202-366-7342**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Hazardous Materials: Frequently Asked Questions-Training Requirements

2024-05268.pdf (230.49 KB)

**Action**Notice.

**Summary**

On March 22, 2022, PHMSA announced an initiative to convert historical letters of interpretation (LOI) applicable to the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) that have been issued to specific stakeholders into broadly applicable frequently asked questions (FAQ). On December 9, 2022, PHMSA published the first set of FAQ regarding applicability of the HMR. On August 18, 2023, PHMSA published the second set of FAQ regarding incident reporting. Today's notice contains the third set of FAQ regarding training requirements.

### **Detail**

**Published Date**03/13/2024

**Comment**Comment now on Regulations.gov

**Federal Register**2024-05268

**Docket Number**PHMSA-2021-0109

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
# C_2007016EN.01000301.xml

| 24.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 January 2007

(2007/C 16/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3040 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 158,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4541 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,65520 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0855 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6167 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,32 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3500 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5784 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,914 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6975 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8600 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3874 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,756 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8425 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6436 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5399 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1689 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8548 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9993 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 226,09 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2682 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1426 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3915 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 846,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5660 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,896 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5140 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,523 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3040

JPY

Japanese yen

158,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,4541

GBP

Pound sterling

0,65520

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0855

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6167

ISK

Iceland króna

89,32

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3500

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5784

CZK

Czech koruna

27,914

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6975

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8600

RON

Romanian leu

3,3874

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,756

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8425

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6436

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5399

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1689

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8548

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9993

KRW

South Korean won

1 226,09

ZAR

South African rand

9,2682

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1426

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3915

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 846,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5660

PHP

Philippine peso

63,896

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5140

THB

Thai baht

45,523

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EX-10.03E







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit No. 10.03e




AMENDMENT

TO 1989 MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE

EMPLOYEES’ INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN





     THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of September 26, 2007 (the “Amendment”) to the 1989 MONRO MUFFLER
BRAKE EMPLOYEES’ INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN, as previously amended (the “1989 Employee Plan”).



     WHEREAS, Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the 1989 Employee Plan to
encourage and enable all eligible employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to acquire a
proprietary interest in the Company through the ownership of the Company’s common stock;



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) has delegated its authority to amend the 1989
Employee Plan to the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board;



     WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the exercise and payment section of the 1989 Employee
Plan to permit the use of “cashless exercise” for the payment of the Option Price (as defined
herein).



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to and in exercise of the authority delegated by the Board to the
Committee, the Committee provides as follows:




	1.	 	RESOLVED, that the first sentence of Section 5(a) shall be replaced in its entirety as follows:






	 	 	Each option, or any installment thereof, shall be exercised, whether in whole or in part, by
giving written notice to the Company at its principal office, specifying the number of
Shares purchased and the purchase price being paid, and accompanied by the payment of all or
such part of the purchase price as shall be specified in the option, at the discretion of
the optionholder, (i) with respect to any options issued hereunder, in cash (including
check, bank draft or money order); or (ii) with respect only to options that do not qualify
as incentive stock options: (a) by delivery of Shares (valued at the fair market value (as
defined in Section 4 hereof) thereof on the date of exercise); (b) by delivery of a
combination of cash and Shares or (c) subject to the terms and conditions established by the
Committee, through the delivery of irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly
to the Company an amount equal to the aggregate purchase price for the Shares being
purchased; provided, however, that the Committee may, in any instance, in order to prevent
any possible violation of law, require the purchase price to be paid in cash; and provided,
further, that the right to deliver Shares in payment of the purchase price may be limited or
denied in any Option agreement.






	2.	 	The 1989 Employee Plan, except as otherwise set forth herein, shall remain in full force and
effect in all other respects.