alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 158.603 Employee compensation. ( a ) *Compensation.* As compensation for service in the DHS-CS, a DHS-CS employee receives a salary as described in paragraph (b) of this section. A DHS-CS employee may also receive additional compensation as described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Salary.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section, a DHS-CS employee receives a salary under the salary system described in § 158.610. The Department sets a DHS-CS employee's salary as described in § 158.620, and salary may include a local cybersecurity talent market supplement described in § 158.612. The Department adjusts a DHS-CS employee's salary as described in § 158.621. ( 1 ) *Uncompensated service.* A DHS-CS employee providing uncompensated service described in § 158.523(a)(2) does not receive a salary under this part.
( 2 ) *Advisory appointees.* A DHS-CS advisory appointee receives a salary as described under subpart J of this part.
( c ) *Additional compensation.* In alignment with the compensation strategy in § 158.601 and subject to the requirements of this subpart F, the Department may provide the additional compensation described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section to DHS-CS employees, unless a DHS-CS employee is providing uncompensated service under § 158.523(a)(2). ( 1 ) *Types.* Additional compensation under CTMS is: ( i ) Recognition under §§ 158.632 through 158.634;
( ii ) Other special payments under §§ 158.640 through 158.643; and
( iii ) Other types of compensation, including leave and benefits, authorized under §§ 158.650 through 158.654 and provided in accordance with relevant provisions of other laws.
( 2 ) *Combining types.* A DHS-CS employee, except such an employee providing uncompensated service and a DHS-CS advisory appointee, may receive any type of additional compensation described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section in combination with any other such type subject to the requirements of this subpart F, and subject to the limit described in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
( 3 ) *Limit.* Additional compensation described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section is subject to, and may be limited by, the aggregate compensation limit described in § 158.604.
( 4 ) *Advisory appointees.* A DHS-CS advisory appointee may receive additional compensation as described in subpart J of this part.
( 5 ) *Department discretion.* Any payment or nonpayment of additional compensation under this part, or the amount of any such compensation, is under the Department's discretion, and may be reviewable only as provided for under subpart I of this part.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-166 

October 7, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022(b)(1) & (8) Benefits Guaranteed. Five Year Phase-in of Guarantee 

OPINION: 

 This is in regard to one of the three PBGC determinations which you intend to address in the reconsideration of the

above matter. 

We have reviewed the question of the dates upon which amendments to the Plan were adopted or became effective

for purposes of Section 4022(b)(8) of ERISA. It appears from the language contained in the collective bargaining

agreements adopted from time to time between the employer and Locals * * * that benefit increases under the Plan were

effectuated by the execution of the collective bargaining agreements themselves, rather than by specific action by the

Board of Trustees. Consequently, we will look to the adoption and effective dates of the collective bargaining

agreements for the purpose of applying the phase-in rule under Section 4022(b)(8) of ERISA. 

If you have any questions, please contact * * * of my staff at * * * 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 5.5 Request for records. ( a ) A request to inspect or copy those public records described in 11 CFR 5.4(a) may be made in person or by filing a request pursuant to 11 CFR 100.19(g).
( b ) Each request shall describe the records sought with sufficient specificity with respect to names, dates and subject matter to permit the records to be located with a reasonable amount of effort. A requester will be promptly advised if the requested records cannot be located on the basis of the description given and that further identifying information must be provided before the request can be satisfied.
( c ) Requests for copies of records not available through the Public Disclosure and Media Relations Division shall be addressed to the Chief FOIA Officer and filed pursuant to 11 CFR 100.19(g). Requests for Commission records not described in 11 CFR 5.4(a) shall be treated as requests made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and shall be governed by 11 CFR part 4. In the event that the Public Disclosure and Media Relations Division receives a written request for access to materials not described in 11 CFR 5.4(a), it shall promptly forward such request to the Commission FOIA Officer for processing in accordance with the provisions of part 4 of this chapter.
[45 FR 31293, May 13, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 50778, Dec. 12, 1985; 75 FR 31, Jan. 4, 2010; 81 FR 94240, Dec. 23, 2016; 82 FR 60853, Dec. 26, 2017; 89 FR 213, Jan. 2, 2024]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Horizon Holding Corporation (the Company), for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dwain Brannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Dwain Brannon                    
|Dwain Brannon                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|Dated: November 15, 2004             



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Horizon Holding Corporation and will be retained by Horizon Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 477 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 477

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
   disparity between identical prescription drugs sold in the United 
                      States, Canada, and Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2000

Mr. Baldacci submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
   disparity between identical prescription drugs sold in the United 
                      States, Canada, and Mexico.

Whereas according to the General Accounting Office, a consumer in the United 
        States pays on average one-third more for a prescription drug than a 
        consumer pays for the same drug in another country;
Whereas currently one-third of senior citizens in the United States are without 
        prescription drug insurance, and these individuals pay on average 15 
        percent more for a prescription than do citizens with prescription drug 
        insurance coverage;
Whereas it is difficult for many Americans, including senior citizens, to afford 
        the prescription drugs that they need to stay healthy;
Whereas many senior citizens in the United States leave the country and go to 
        Canada or Mexico to buy prescription drugs that are developed, 
        manufactured, and approved in the United States in order to buy such 
        drugs at lower prices than such drugs are sold for in the United States;
Whereas the United States has made a strong commitment to supporting the 
        research and development of new drugs through taxpayer-supported funding 
        of the National Institutes of Health, through the research and 
        development tax credit, and through other means;
Whereas the development of new drugs is important because the use of such drugs 
        enables people to live longer and lead healthier, more productive lives;
Whereas citizens of other countries should pay a portion of the research and 
        development costs for new drugs, or their fair share of such costs, 
        rather than just reap the benefits of such drugs; and
Whereas many State governments are undertaking a variety of plans to address the 
        needs of citizens who lack affordable drug coverage: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the cost disparity between identical prescription drugs sold in the 
United States, Canada, and Mexico should be reduced or eliminated.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations found
on pages F-2 through F-4 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year to date, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                       347
<INVENTORY>                                      3,596
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,310
<PP&E>                                          22,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,655
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             4
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,995
<SALES>                                        155,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,211
<CGS>                                          130,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    960
<INCOME-TAX>                                       210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                259
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       259
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
# C_2006326EN.01001902.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-94/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to transpose - Directive 2002/49/EC)

(2006/C 326/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and B. Schima, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: E. Riedl, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise — Declaration by the Commission in the Conciliation Committee on the Directive relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (OJ 2002 L 189, p.12)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose into national law Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise as regards the Provinces of Burgenland, Carinthia, Upper Austria, Salzburg, Styria and Tyrol, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose into national law Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise as regards the Provinces of Burgenland, Carinthia, Upper Austria, Salzburg, Styria and Tyrol, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(1) of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 08.04.2006.

1

---
# C_2007096EN.01002704.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 19 March 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-83/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 96/50)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.

1

---
### SERVE D MARC H 19 , 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N : y / :-.J'-P M 

### OFFIC EO FHEARING S y M-iU; . WASHINGTON , D.C . I NTH EMATTE RO F EMPIR EAIRWAYS , Responden t FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10EA000 2 (Civi l Penalty Proceeding ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-019 1 ADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDGE' S ORDE REXTENDIN G

TIM ET O FIL EANSWE RO RMOTIO N ADDRESSE D T O COMPLAIN T Th e Responden t

ha s filed amotio n seekin g a n extensio no f th e deadlin e for

filing it s answe r

t o th e complain t

o r motio naddresse dt o th e sufficienc y o f

th e complaint . Th e motio npaper s represen t tha t th e Complainan t

ha s n o objectio n t o th e relie f requeste dtherein . Fo r goo dcause , th e motio ni s granted , an dth e deadlin e for th e Responden t

t o file it s answe r

o r amotio naddresse dt o th e sufficienc y o f th e complain t i s extende dt o Marc h25 , 2010 . I T I S S O ORDERED .

IsaatTD . Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg eFA A Docke t No . CP10EA000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Charles J . Casolaro , Respondent' s Counse l Casolar o Sussman , LL P 105 0 Frankli n Avenue , Suit e 40 2 Garde n City , N Y 1153 0 TEL : 516-248-139 9 FAX : 516-248-225 7 Zachary M . Berman , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D . Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 . TEL : Attorne y 202-366-043 7 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the following address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , DC 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC^SO .
§ 700.819 Suspension and revocation of permits. ( a ) *Suspension or revocation for cause.* ( 1 ) The Federal Land Manager may suspend a permit issued pursuant to this part upon determining that the permittee has failed to meet any of the terms and conditions of the permit or has violated any prohibition of the Act or § 700.807. The Federal Land Manager shall provide written notice to the permittee of suspension, the cause thereof, and the requirements which must be met before the suspension will be removed.
( 2 ) The Federal Land Manager may revoke a permit upon assessment of a civil penalty under § 700.831 upon the permittee's conviction under section 6 of the Act, or upon determining that the permittee has failed after notice under this section to correct the situation which led to suspension of the permit.
( b ) *Suspension or revocation for management purposes.* The Federal Land Manager may suspend or revoke a permit without liability to the United States, its agents, or employees when continuation of work under the permit would be in conflict with management requirements not in effect when the permit was issued. The Federal Land Manager shall provide written notice to the permittee stating the nature of and basis for the suspension or revocation.
§ 7.12 Violations of classified information requirements. ( a ) Any person who suspects or has knowledge of a violation of this part, including the known or suspected loss or compromise of classified information, shall promptly report such violations or possible violations, pursuant to requirements set forth in DHS directives.
( b ) DHS employees and detailees may be reprimanded, suspended without pay, terminated from classification authority, suspended from or denied access to classified information, or subject to other sanctions in accordance with applicable law and DHS regulations or directives if they: ( 1 ) Knowingly, willfully, or negligently disclose to unauthorized persons information properly classified under Executive Order 13526, or its predecessor orders;
( 2 ) Knowingly, willfully, or negligently classify or continue the classification of information in violation of Executive Order 13526, or its implementing directives; or
( 3 ) Knowingly, willfully, or negligently create or continue a special access program contrary to the requirements of Executive Order 13526; or,
( 4 ) Knowingly, willfully, or negligently violate any other provision of Executive Order 13526, or DHS implementing directives, or;
( 5 ) Knowingly, willfully, or negligently grant eligibility for, or allow access to, classified information in violation of Executive Order 13526, or its implementing directives, this part, or DHS implementing directives promulgated by the Chief Security Officer.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**IDEAEDGE, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IdeaEdge, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Shultz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
ARCHIVED

||
||
| **DCLPublicationDate: 5/1/95DCLID: GEN-95-25AwardYear: Summary: Announcement of June 29 Student Financial Assistance                        Videoconference**May 1995GEN-95-25SUMMARY:  Announcement of June 29 Student Financial Assistance                        VideoconferenceDear Colleague:Student Financial Assistance Programs  is pleased to announce avideoconference to be presented June 29 from 1:00 p.m to 4:00 p.m.Eastern time.  The topic of the videoconference is "Federal PellGrant Reporting and Systems Changes with Related Policy Issues."This videoconference, presented free of charge to allpostsecondary institutions by the U.S. Department of Education, willfocus on Pell automated reporting options, changes in the PellPayment software, selected policy issues related to the awarding ofPell grants, and other topics.The videoconference will be presented by a team of Department ofEducation, contractor and school staff.  It will be interactive,offering participants the opportunity to use a toll-free number orFAX to question the panel of presenters.  Schools are permitted torecord this videoconference for their own use.The June 29 videoconference will be broadcast on the followingsatellites:-    KU Band - Galaxy 7, (91 degrees west), Transponder 22,     Vertical Downlink     Frequency 12140 Mhz     Audio at 6.2 and 6.8-    C Band - Galaxy 3, (93.5 degrees west), Transponder 7,     Horizontal  Downlink     Frequency 3840 Mhz     Audio at 6.2 and 6.8Enclosed is a form to register for the videoconference.  If youwish to register as a host (receiving) site, please include thespecific address of the building in which the videoconference willbe received.We will provide schools with a list of host sites by way of thePostsecondary Education Network (PEN) and the SFA Bulletin Board.If you are unable to access the remote site informationelectronically, please call the Federal Student Aid InformationCenter at 1-800-4-FEDAID for information about the host sitenearest to you.  Individuals wishing to travel to a host siteshould contact that sitens coordinator to indicate that they willattend.If you are unable to view the videoconference live, you may borrowa copy of it on videotape.  Call 1-800-4-FEDAID (toll-free) oneweek following the videoconference to borrow a tape.We look forward to communicating with you on this important topicthrough this interactive technology.Sincerely,Elizabeth M. HicksDeputy Assistant Secretary forStudent Financial Assistance ProgramsEnclosure[[ The enclosure "REMOTE (RECEIVING) SITE  RESPONSE FORM" is currently unavailable for viewing.  Please reference your paper document for additional information.]] |
||
| FOIA |      Privacy |      Security |      NoticesWhiteHouse.gov |      USA.gov |      ED.gov |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 111.14 Witness fees and mileage (52 U.S.C. 30107 (a)(5)).

Witnesses subpoenaed to appear for depositions shall be paid the same fees and mileage as witnesses in the courts of the United States. Such fees may be tendered at the time the witness appears for such deposition, or within a reasonable time thereafter.