alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 552 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 552

Urging the House to support mentoring programs such as Saturday Academy 
      at the Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2000

 Mr. Wu (for himself, Mr. Walden of Oregon, Ms. Hooley of Oregon, Mr. 
    DeFazio, Mr. Blumenauer, and Mr. Baird) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Urging the House to support mentoring programs such as Saturday Academy 
      at the Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology.

Whereas exceptional opportunities should be provided for students in grades 4 
        through 12 to learn from accomplished professionals through hands-on, 
        practical, and intellectual learning experiences;
Whereas workshops, internships, and laboratories are offered during and after-
        school hours, weekends, and summers;
Whereas Saturday Academy links universities, private companies and their 
        resources, staff, laboratories, classrooms, and equipment with students 
        to provide the opportunity to use real tools to solve real life 
        problems;
Whereas opportunities provided by programs such as Saturday Academy bridge the 
        gap between the classroom and the real world;
Whereas students from low-income families and groups underrepresented in science 
        and engineering are actively recruited and supported by Saturday 
        Academy;
Whereas nearly 99,000 students since 1983 have received Saturday Academy 
        instruction in rural, urban, and suburban areas;
Whereas Saturday Academy received the Presidential Award for Excellence in 
        Science, Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring by the President in 1996;
Whereas the 1995 Third International Mathematics and Science Study found that in 
        the final year of secondary school, the performance of the United States 
        was among the lowest in both science and mathematics;
Whereas, the United States is facing a shortage of qualified professionals in 
        science, technology, and engineering; and
Whereas Saturday Academy places special emphasis on science, mathematics, and 
        technology: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports and encourages 
programs such as Saturday Academy to help students enter mathematics, 
science, and engineering fields.
                                 <all>
```
§ 158.702 Designating qualified positions. ( a ) When a DHS organization requires individuals possessing CTMS qualifications to ensure the most effective execution of the DHS cybersecurity mission and the recruitment and retention of such individuals would likely be enhanced by using CTMS, the Secretary or designee designates qualified positions.
( b ) CTMS policy implementing this section addresses: ( 1 ) Procedures for DHS organizations to request using CTMS;
( 2 ) Requirements for DHS organization using CTMS; and
( 3 ) Information necessary to designate qualified positions.
( c ) Designating qualified positions may result in: ( 1 ) Establishing one or more qualified positions under the talent acquisition system, described in § 158.501; or
( 2 ) Designating and staffing one or more assignments as described in § 158.703; or
( 3 ) Both results described in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section.
( d ) Designating qualified positions involves budget and fiscal considerations related to establishing one or more qualified positions under the talent acquisition system, described in § 158.501.
### §1795i. Annual report

The annual report required by section 1752a(d) of this title shall include a full report of the activities of the Facility.

(June 26, 1934, ch. 750, title III, formerly subch. III, §310, as added Pub. L. 95–630, title XVIII, §1802, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3723; amended Pub. L. 96–221, title III, §309(b)(1), Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 149; Pub. L. 109–351, title VII, §726(27), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 2003.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 309(b)(1) of Pub. L. 96–221 redesignated subch. III as title III of act June 26, 1934, ch. 750, cited as a credit to this section.

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–351 substituted "section 1752a(d)" for "section 1752a(e)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 1806 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 1795 of this title.
Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Update

As of March 31, 2023

JTF-RH is currently ON PLAN to begin gravity defueling on October 16, 2023

DoD Repairs Completed

253/253

Start Complete

Number of Validated Repairs 

Submitted to DOH for Review/Approval

August 7: Repairs Approved by DOH

August 15: Fire Watch Training Ends

August 16-17: Firefighting Drill

August 22: DISF

1 Meeting 

August 28-30: Repacking 

August 31: NEPA

1 Complete

September 1-30: Final Preparations for Defueling

September 19: HNL Dept of Emergency 

Management / Local Emergency Planning 

Committee

Next 90 Days July 2023 August 2023 September 2023

July 13: Response Drill 

July 14: Fire Watch Training Begins

July 17-28: Surge Tank Draining 

July 17: Tank Tightness Testing Complete

3

rd Party Quality Validation Completed 

227/253

Start Complete

Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Dashboard

As of July 12, 2023

Subject to Revision

Dashboard Legend 1

DISF: Defueling Information Sharing Forum

FTAC: Fuel Tank Advisory Committee

NEPA: National Environmental Policy Act

Surge Tanks Tank Tightness Testing 

On July 17, Tank Tightness 

Testing will be complete. To 

learn more about the 

importance of Tank 

Tightness Testing, click on 

the video to the left. 

Start Complete

Key Events

227/253

DOH Conditional Approval

Start Complete

114/253

Android coming soon!

Within the underground pump house, there 

are four surge tanks holding approximately 

480,000 gallons of fuel. Surge Tank draining 

is scheduled to begin July 17. Click here to 

learn more about the process.
### §1447. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–102, title VI, §606(c), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1454

Section, act July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §27, as added Pub. L. 103–204, §18, Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2401, related to Housing Opportunity Hotline program.

A prior section 1447, act July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §27, 47 Stat. 740, related to institutions authorized to subscribe for stock of banks, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §704(c), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 416.
Exhibit 31.1






CERTIFICATION




I, James Whang, certify that:




1.              I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Fixed Income Trust for Prudential Financial, Inc. Notes, Series 2012-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.              Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.              Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.              Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.              All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  The Bank Of New York Mellon, as Trustee.




Date: March 14, 2014








/s/ James WhangName:  James WhangTitle:    Treasurer(senior officer in charge of

securitization of the depositor)
#### STATE v. INMAN

No. 140P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 507

Petition by defendant (Sizemore) for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 May 1990.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rolando Whittaker, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 271]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J), rendered April 12, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of *21js*to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contentions regarding the alleged violation of his plea agreement are unpreserved since he raised no such claims at sentencing but merely asked for leniency *(see e.g. People v Lopez,*290 AD2d 323 [2002], *lv denied*97 NY2d 757 [2002]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that record establishes defendant’s failure to fulfill his obligations under the agreement, which authorized the court to impose the maximum lawful sentence *(id.).*

On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). Concur—Friedman, J.P, Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
### Geology, petroleum development, and seismicity of the Santa Barbara channel region, California

By: J.G. VedderH. C. WagnerJ. E. SchoellhamerR.F. YerkesK. A. YenneT. H. McCullohR. M. HamiltonR.D. Brown Jr.R. O. BurfordJ. M. DeNoyer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp679

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §§1211 to 1215. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–230, §24, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 466

Sections, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title II, §206(a)–(e), 42 Stat. 1464, related to amount of capital stock and payment as condition to grant of certificate to do business, increase or reduction of capital stock and withdrawal of paid-in capital, transfer of shares, collection of unpaid subscriptions, and shareholders voting by proxy, respectively.
§ 91.11 Domestic animals in village reserves. ( a ) No livestock shall be permitted to trespass in any village reserve except that unassigned lots or unplatted areas enclosed by adequate fences may be leased by the village committee with the approval of the Superintendent and the proceeds therefrom credited to the account of the village committee. Trespassing livestock may be impounded by the village committee. The village committee shall give notice of impoundment to the owner of the animal, if known, by certified mail or by posting in the village square. The notice shall advise the owner that a $10 charge shall be assessed per day for each animal impounded and a reasonable charge for forage consumed and that the animal or animals shall be sold at the expiration of twenty (20) days from the date of mailing or posting the notice. In the event an animal is sold, the balance after deducting $10 per day for impoundment and a reasonable forage charge, shall be deposited at the Osage Agency and the owner may claim said funds if satisfactory proof of ownership is presented to the Superintendent of the Osage Agency within six (6) months of the date of sale. After six (6) months, any funds remaining on deposit will become the property of the village in which the animal was trespassing.
( b ) No horses, mules, bovine, hogs, sheep, or goats shall be penned on assigned lots.
[33 FR 8270, June 4, 1968. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

Map 2-11

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_2\WC_altC.pdf

Location in Arizona

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Lands Managed to Maintain

Wilderness Characteristics

Alternative C

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Legend

Data Source:

Wilderness Characteristics Alternative: BLM 2005

Mining Claims: BLM 2003

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: U.S. Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

CAP Canal

River

General Reference

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Reference Information

Lands Managed to Maintain Wilderness Characteristics

Note:

 Land use allocations, designations, and management 

 prescriptions apply only to public lands administered

 by the BLM. If non-Federal lands are acquired, they

 would be managed according to the allocations

 depicted on the map.

Surface Management

American Indian Reservation

Military Reservations

State Trust Lands

State, County, City; Wildlife, Park and Outdoor Recreation

Areas

Private

Bureau of Land Management

Pima County

National Park Service

Bureau of Reclamation

Existing Mining Claim

(Areas would be removed from management to maintain

wilderness characteristics upon validity of the claim.)
First, Department,

March, 1908.

#### Bertha Exl, Respondent, *v.*Amos Gordon, Appellant.

*Venue*— assault.— *change of place of trial denied*— *convenience of witnesses.*

Appeal from an order entered in the office, of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8th day of November, 1907, denying a. motion for a change of venue from New York county to Greene county.

Per Curiam:

The action is' to recover for an assault which plaintiff alleges was committed upon her by the defendant at Tannersville, Greene county. The order appealed from denied a motion to change the place of trial from the county of-New York to the county.of Greene for the convenience of witnesses. We are satisfied from an inspection of the record that the great majority of the witnesses of the transactions complained of reside in the county where the cause of action arose. We, therefore, think that the motion should have been granted. The order appealed from is, therefore, 'reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion 'for a change of venue to Greene county granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
H. Res. 86

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 3, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 661) to direct the Secretary of Transportation

to prohibit the commercial operation of supersonic transport

category aircraft that do not comply with stage 3 noise levels

if the European Union adopts certain aircraft noise regulations. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to

comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The

bill shall be considered as read. During consideration of the

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the
2

•HRES 86 EH

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EX-34.4
(logo)Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Certified Public Accountants
333 Southeast Second Avenue
Suite 3600
Miami, FL  33131
USA

Tel: +1 305 372 3100
Fax: +1 305 372 3160
www.deloitte.com


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors
LNR Partners, LLC
Miami Beach, Florida

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that LNR Partners, LLC (the "Company") complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions for
which the Company served as special servicer, and that were registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, excluding criteria
1122(d)(l)(iii), (3)(i)(c), (3)(i)(d), (3)(ii), (3)(iii), (3)(iv), (4)(v),
(4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii) and (4)(xv), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were
limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have
included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included
in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period
specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012 for the commercial mortgage-backed securities Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

February 22, 2013

Member of
DeloitteToucheTohmatsu Limited
### Penalties
#### § 81.20 What is the first action to be taken by the Chair of the Election Board?

Within 5 days after the Secretarial Election Board representatives are appointed, the Chair must hold the first meeting of the Secretarial Election Board to set the election date.