alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006331EN.01001902.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 December 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-78/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/49/EC - Assessment and management of environmental noise - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2006/C 331/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: S. Schreiner, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (OJ 2002 L 189, p. 12)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.3.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 12.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               KeySpan Corporation
                    Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges



                          Three Months   Twelve Months   Twelve Months   Twelve Months    Nine Months   Twelve Months  Twelve Months
                             Ended           Ended           Ended           Ended           Ended         Ended          Ended
                            March 31,    December 31,    December 31,     December 31,    December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
                              2002           2001            2000             1999           1998            1998           1997
                              ----           ----            ----             ----           ----            ----           ----
<S>                          <C>           <C>             <C>            <C>         <C>                <C>              <C>
Earnings
   Net Income                 219,062       284,539         329,092        269,752       (196,074)        362,240         322,409
   Income Tax                 118,820       210,695         217,262        136,362        (59,800)        232,653         211,333
   Transaction income tax           -             -               -              -     (99,700.00)              -               -
   Interest Charges            74,640       373,466         204,278        138,655        140,188         409,066         438,926
   Portion of Rentals
    Representing Interest       9,983        50,271          43,433         23,433          9,641           3,309           3,390
   Adjustment Related to
     Equity Investments        (4,154)       (5,559)          1,497         (5,979)        (1,623)             (5)            (22)
                          ------------  ------------  --------------  --------------------------------------------   -------------

   Earnings Available to
    Cover                     418,351       913,412         795,562        562,223       (207,368)      1,007,263         976,036
                          ============  ============  ==============  ============================================   =============
      Fixed Charges


Fixed Charges
   Interest Charges             76806       385,507         218,017        150,515        147,998         409,066         438,926
   Portion of Rentals
    Representing Interest        9983        50,271          43,433         23,433          9,641           3,309           3,390

                          ------------  ------------  --------------  --------------------------------------------   -------------

                               86,789       435,778         261,450        173,948        157,639         412,375         442,316
                          ============  ============  ==============  ============================================   =============

   Total Fixed Charges


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed       4.82          2.10            3.04           3.23          N/A              2.44            2.21
  Charges                 ============  ============  ==============  ============================================   =============
</TABLE>
### §§123 to 126. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(e)(12), (13), (f)(4)(C), (6), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2292, 2293

Section 123, R.S. §5195; June 20, 1874, ch. 343, §3, 18 Stat. 123, related to redemption of notes by bank at own counter.

Section 124, R.S. §5184; June 23, 1874, ch. 455, §1, 18 Stat. 206, related to destroying and replacing notes unfit for use.

Section 125, act July 28, 1892, ch. 317, 27 Stat. 322, related to redemption of lost or stolen notes.

Section 126, act June 20, 1874, ch. 343, §8, 18 Stat. 125, related to duty of Treasurer, designated depositaries, and national-bank depositaries of United States to return notes of failed or liquidated banks to Treasury for redemption.
# C_2006331EN.01002403.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/24

---

Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 22 November 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland

(Case C-105/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 331/44)

Language of the case: Finnish

Language of the case: Finnish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.

1

---
§ 292.6 What must be demonstrated to meet the “initial reservation” exception? This section contains criteria for meeting the requirements of 25 U.S.C. 2719(b)(1)(B)(ii), known as the “initial reservation” exception. Gaming may occur on newly acquired lands under this exception only when all of the following conditions in this section are met: ( a ) The tribe has been acknowledged (federally recognized) through the administrative process under part 83 of this chapter.
( b ) The tribe has no gaming facility on newly acquired lands under the restored land exception of these regulations.
( c ) The land has been proclaimed to be a reservation under 25 U.S.C. 467 and is the first proclaimed reservation of the tribe following acknowledgment.
( d ) If a tribe does not have a proclaimed reservation on the effective date of these regulations, to be proclaimed an initial reservation under this exception, the tribe must demonstrate the land is located within the State or States where the Indian tribe is now located, as evidenced by the tribe's governmental presence and tribal population, and within an area where the tribe has significant historical connections and one or more of the following modern connections to the land: ( 1 ) The land is near where a significant number of tribal members reside; or
( 2 ) The land is within a 25-mile radius of the tribe's headquarters or other tribal governmental facilities that have existed at that location for at least 2 years at the time of the application for land-into-trust; or
( 3 ) The tribe can demonstrate other factors that establish the tribe's current connection to the land.
### §1706. Repealed. Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title VIII, §802(b), 68 Stat. 642

Section, acts June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title I, §5, 48 Stat. 1247; Mar. 28, 1941, ch. 31, §3, 55 Stat. 61; Aug. 10, 1948, ch. 832, title IV, §402 (part), 62 Stat. 1283; Aug. 8, 1949, ch. 403, §2 (part), 63 Stat. 576; Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title I, §122, 64 Stat. 59; Sept. 1, 1951, ch. 378, title II, §202 (part), 65 Stat. 303, related to reports to Congress. See section 1701o of this title.
§ 700.835 Other penalties and rewards. ( a ) Section 6 of the Act contains criminal prohibitions and provisions for criminal penalties. Section 8(b) of the Act provides that archaeological resources, vehicles, or equipment involved in a violation may be subject to forfeiture.
( b ) Section 8(a) of the Act provides for rewards to be made to persons who furnish information which leads to conviction for a criminal violation or to assessment of a civil penalty. The Federal Land Manager may certify to the Secretary of the Treasury that a person is eligible to receive payment. Officers and employees of Federal, State, or tribal government who furnish information or render services in the performance of their official duties, and persons who have provided information under § 700.833(b)(1)(iii) shall not be certified eligible to receive payment of rewards.
( c ) All civil penalty monies and any item forfeited under the provisions of this section shall be transferred to the Navajo Nation.
### §1111. Claims and interests

(a) A proof of claim or interest is deemed filed under section 501 of this title for any claim or interest that appears in the schedules filed under section 521(a)(1) or 1106(a)(2) of this title, except a claim or interest that is scheduled as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated.

(b)(1)(A) A claim secured by a lien on property of the estate shall be allowed or disallowed under section 502 of this title the same as if the holder of such claim had recourse against the debtor on account of such claim, whether or not such holder has such recourse, unless—

(i) the class of which such claim is a part elects, by at least two-thirds in amount and more than half in number of allowed claims of such class, application of paragraph (2) of this subsection; or

(ii) such holder does not have such recourse and such property is sold under section 363 of this title or is to be sold under the plan.

(B) A class of claims may not elect application of paragraph (2) of this subsection if—

(i) the interest on account of such claims of the holders of such claims in such property is of inconsequential value; or

(ii) the holder of a claim of such class has recourse against the debtor on account of such claim and such property is sold under section 363 of this title or is to be sold under the plan.

(2) If such an election is made, then notwithstanding section 506(a) of this title, such claim is a secured claim to the extent that such claim is allowed.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2630; Pub. L. 111–327, §2(a)(32), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3561.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

A discussion of section 1111(b) of the House amendment is best considered in the context of confirmation and will therefore, be discussed in connection with section 1129.

#### senate report no. 95–989

This section dispenses with the need for every creditor and equity security holder to file a proof of claim or interest in a reorganization case. Usually the debtor's schedules are accurate enough that they will suffice to determine the claims or interests allowable in the case. Thus, the section specifies that any claim or interest included on the debtor's schedules is deemed filed under section 501. This does not apply to claims or interests that are scheduled as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–327 substituted "521(a)(1)" for "521(1)".
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.50 What Federal laws, regulations, and Executive Orders apply to subcontractors?

Certain provisions of the Act as well as other applicable Federal laws, regulations, and Executive Orders apply to subcontracts awarded under self-determination contracts. As a result, subcontracts should contain a provision informing the recipient that their award is funded with Indian Self-Determination Act funds and that the recipient is responsible for identifying and ensuring compliance with applicable Federal laws, regulations, and Executive Orders. The Secretary and the Indian tribe or tribal organization may, through negotiation, identify all or a portion of such requirements in the self-determination contract and, if so identified, these requirements should be identified in subcontracts.
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 637 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 19, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 114) making further continuing appropriations for the 
fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 522.3 Amendment. ( a ) Within 15 days after adoption, a tribe shall submit for the Chair's approval, via electronic or physical mail, any amendment to an ordinance or resolution.
( b ) A tribe shall submit to the Chair all of the following information with a request for approval of an amendment: ( 1 ) One copy of the amendment certified as authentic by an authorized tribal official;
( 2 ) Any submission under § 522.2(b) through (h) that has been modified since it prior conveyance to the Chair for an ordinance, resolution, or amendment approval; and
( 3 ) A conforming copy of the entire ordinance or resolution.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Ambassador Chung’s Remarks at World Water Day Event 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 52-029-COL, 52-030-COL]

Commissioners: Gregory B. Jaczko, Chairman, Kristine L. Svinicki, George Apostolakis, William D. Magwood, IV, William C. Ostendorff.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.4, notice is hereby given that Jean-Claude Dehmel, Senior Health Physicist, Office of New Reactors, Division of Construction Inspection and Operating Programs, has been appointed as a Commission adjudicatory employee within the meaning of section 2.4, to advise the Commission regarding issues relating to pending appeal filed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff in this case. Mr. Dehmel has not previously performed any investigative or litigating function in connection with this or any related proceeding. Until such time as a final decision is issued in this matter, interested persons outside the agency and agency employees performing investigative or litigating functions in this proceeding are required to observe the restrictions of 10 CFR 2.347 and 2.348 in their communications with Mr. Dehmel.

*It is so ordered.*

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of February, 2011.

For the Commission.

Andrew L. Bates,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2011-4675 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
§ 584.5 How do I file a motion to intervene? ( a ) An entity or an individual, whether acting on his or her own behalf or as an agent of another entity not permitted to appeal, may be permitted to participate as a party if the presiding official finds that: ( 1 ) The final decision could directly and adversely affect it or the class it represents;
( 2 ) The individual or entity may contribute materially to the disposition of the proceedings;
( 3 ) The individual's or the entity's interest is not adequately represented by existing parties; and
( 4 ) Intervention would not unfairly prejudice existing parties or delay resolution of the proceeding.
( b ) A tribe with jurisdiction over the lands on which there is a gaming operation that is the subject of a proceeding under this part may intervene as a matter of right if the tribe is not already a party.
( c ) A motion to intervene shall be submitted to the presiding official within 10 days of the notice of appeal. The motion shall be filed with the presiding official and served on each person who has been made a party at the time of filing. The motion shall state succinctly: ( 1 ) The moving party's interest in the proceeding;
( 2 ) How his or her participation as a party will contribute materially to the disposition of the proceeding;
( 3 ) Who will appear for the moving party;
( 4 ) The issues on which the moving party seeks to participate; and
( 5 ) Whether the moving party seeks to present witnesses.
( d ) Objections to the motion must be filed by any party within 10 days after service of the motion.
( e ) A reply brief to the brief in opposition may be filed within 5 days of service of the brief in opposition.
( f ) When motions to intervene are made by individuals or groups with common interests, the presiding official may request all such movants to designate a single representative, or he or she may recognize one or more movants.
( g ) The presiding official shall give each movant and party written notice of his or her decision on the motion. For each motion granted, the presiding official shall provide a brief statement of the reason(s) for the decision. If the motion is denied, the presiding official shall briefly state the ground(s) for denial. The presiding official may allow the movant to participate as *amicus curiae,* if appropriate.
-  Home 
-  About 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# PHMSA Regional Map

regional-map-040524.pdf (111.9 KB)

PHMSA Regional Map

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.127 How is withdrawal of consent to a foster-care placement achieved? ( a ) The parent or Indian custodian may withdraw consent to voluntary foster-care placement at any time.
( b ) To withdraw consent, the parent or Indian custodian must file a written document with the court or otherwise testify before the court. Additional methods of withdrawing consent may be available under State law.
( c ) When a parent or Indian custodian withdraws consent to a voluntary foster-care placement, the court must ensure that the Indian child is returned to that parent or Indian custodian as soon as practicable.