alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William J. Burns, Respondent, *v.*William F. Baker and Others, Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Appellants.

Second Department,

February 28, 1908.

Civil service — police officer, city of New York — credit marks for heroic act.

When a police officer in the city óf New York has been once promoted for an heroic act, he is not again entitled to be credited with marks for the same act when' he enters a competitive civil service examination to get on the eligible list for promotion to a still higher grade.

Appeal by the defendants, William F. Baker and others, constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York,, from .an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the lltli day of December, 1907, granting the relator’s application for a peremptory writ of mandamus.

*566
      *James I). Bell [Francis K. Pendleton*with him on the brief], for the appellants.

*Robert IE. Wilson,*for the respondent.

Gaynor, J.:

The relator was. promoted from patrolman to roundsman for an act of heroic conduct in pursuing and taking a murderer at great personal risk. How, having entered a competitive examination by the municipal civil service commissioners to get on the eligible list for promotion to another grade, *i. e.,*that of sergeant, he claims that he is entitled to be credited, with 4 marks for the said act of heroism ; that, being the number given in marking for conduct and efficiency, where the competitor is entitled to any credit for such an act. The civil service commissioners disallowed them to him, and;, appeal from the order, below allowing- a writ of mandamus to the relator to compel them to credit him with them; and re-rate him on the list accordingly. ' -

. Having been-, credited with the act of heroism, in the grade in which he performed it, and promoted thereon, lie is not.entitled to be credited with it again' in order to get- another promotion to a higher grade. ■ Section 288. of the city charter provides that “ Individual acts of personal bravery may be treated as an element ' of meritorious service in such examination ” (examinations for promotion by the civil service commissioners), “ the relative rating therefor to be fixed by the municipal civil'service commission ”. The said commission has a rule confining rating for service (which includes conduct and efficiency) to service in the grade from which promotion is sought (Bulé XV, sub. 6). The language of the said section of the charter is hot mandatory that the competitor shall be given a rating for his acts of bravery in, every succeeding grade in which he enters a competitive examination for promotion, without regard to whether they Were performed in that grade.

The order sho.uld be reversed and the- motion deniéd.

Woodward, Jenks, Bich and Miller, JJ., concurred..

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
EXHIBIT 32 - CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (Issuer) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Richard E. Dauch, Co-Founder, Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, and I, Michael K. Simonte, Executive Vice President - Finance & Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

















/s/ Richard E. Dauch/s/  Michael K. SimonteRichard E. DauchMichael K. SimonteCo-Founder, Chairman of the Board &Executive Vice President - Finance &Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial OfficerOctober 29, 2010October 29, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The National Science Board's (NSB) Audit & Oversight (A&O) Committee, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the NSF Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of an                     *Impromptu Change*                     in regard to the addition of an agenda item that will be discussed during the closed session of the A&O Committee meeting scheduled for February 16, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., as follows:                

# ORIGINAL DATE AND TIME: 

No change.

# SUBJECT MATTER (agenda item added): 

5 minute update on Cyber issues at NSF.

# STATUS: 

No change.

# LOCATION: 

No change.

# UPDATES AND POINT OF CONTACT: 

                        Please refer to the National Science Board Web site                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for additional information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.*                         Point of contact for this meeting is: Jennie Moehlmann, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                         *Telephone:*                         (703) 292-7000.                    

Daniel A. Lauretano,

Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-3585 Filed 2-14-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
§ 141.20 Payment for purchase of Indian goods or services. ( a ) A reservation business shall pay for the purchase of Indian goods or services with cash or a fully negotiable check. A reservation business may not pay for Indian goods or services with trade slips or future credit. In any transaction involving the purchase of Indian goods on the Navajo Reservation, the reservation business shall furnish a bill of sale indicating the name of the seller, a description of the goods, the amount paid for the goods, the date of sale, and the signature of both parties and shall retain a copy of the bill of sales in its business records.
( b ) A reservation business owner or employee may advise a customer selling Indian goods or services of the amount due on the customer's credit accounts, pawn accounts or any other obligation the customer owes to the business, but in no event may the owner or employee withhold the proceeds of the sale from the customer on the basis of existing credit obligations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	5
       
<S>					       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>		Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>			Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>			Dec-31-1996
<CASH>				     $100,000
<SECURITIES>			0
<RECEIVABLES>			731,000
<ALLOWANCES>			100,000
<INVENTORY>			 1,609,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>			2,541,000
<PP&E>				         1,465,000
<DEPRECIATION>		  	684,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			  3,376,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>		7,387,000
<BONDS>				0
<COMMON>				234,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	1,770,000
<PREFERRED>			0
<OTHER-SE>				(6,215,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	 3,376,000
<SALES>				4,986,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	       4,986,000
<CGS>					6,563,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>			6,563,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>			0
<LOSS-PROVISION>			0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		793,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>			(8,509,000)
<INCOME-TAX>			481,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		(8,990,000)
<DISCONTINUED>			0	
<EXTRAORDINARY>			1,550,000
<CHANGES>				0
<NET-INCOME>			(7,440,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>			(2.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>			(2.90)
        

</TABLE>
-  Home 

# Certification Agency Approvals Standard Operating Procedures

Certification Agency Approvals SOP_Final_06 27 11.pdf (442.45 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
H. Res. 673

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

December 15, 2000.

Whereas on December 11, 2000, an MV–22 Osprey aircraft

crashed during a training mission near Jacksonville,

North Carolina, killing all four members of the United

States Marine Corps onboard;

Whereas the Marines who lost their lives in the crash made

the ultimate sacrifice in the service of the United States

and the Marine Corps;

Whereas the families of these proud Marines have the most

sincere condolences of the Nation;

Whereas the members of the Marine Corps take special pride

in their esprit de corps, and this terrible loss will resonate through Marine Helicopter Squadron 1 based at

Quantico, Virginia, Marine Medium Tiltrotor Training

Squadron 204 based at Marine Corps Air Station New

River, North Carolina, and the entire Marine Corps family;

Whereas the Nation joins the Commandant of the entire Marine Corps and the Marine Corps in mourning their loss;

and

Whereas the Marines killed in the accident were—
2

•HRES 673 EH

(1) Lieutenant Colonel Keith M. Sweaney, 42, of

Richmond, Virginia, assigned to Marine Helicopter

Squadron 1, based at Quantico, Virginia;

(2) Major Michael L. Murphy 38, of Blauvelt, New

York, assigned to Marine Medium Tiltrotor Training

Squadron 204, based at Marine Corps Air Station New

River, North Carolina;

(3) Staff Sergeant Avely W. Runnels, 25, of

Morven, Georgia, assigned to Marine Medium Tiltrotor

Training Squadron 204, based at Marine Corps Air Station New River, North Carolina; and

(4) Sergeant Jason A. Buyck, 24, of Sodus, New

York, assigned to Marine Medium Tiltrotor Training

Squadron 204, based at Marine Corps Air Station New

River, North Carolina: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) has learned with profound sorrow of the deaths

of four members of the United States Marine Corps in

the crash of an MV–22 Osprey aircraft on December 11,

2000, during a training mission near Jacksonville, North

Carolina, and extends condolences to the families of

those four members of the Marine Corps;

(2) recognizes that those four members of the Marine Corps embodied the credo of the Marine Corps,

‘‘Semper Fidelis’’;
3

•HRES 673 EH

(3) expresses its profound gratitude to those four

members of the Marine Corps for the dedicated and honorable service they rendered to the United States and

the Marine Corps; and

(4) recognizes with appreciation and respect the loyalty and sacrifice their families have demonstrated in

support of the Marine Corps.

SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall

transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the Commandant of the Marine Corps and to the families of each

member of the Marine Corps killed in the accident referred

to in the first section of this resolution.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.1



AMENDMENT TO THE

PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP.

2002 STOCK OPTION PLAN



WHEREAS, the shareholders of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) adopted the Pulaski Financial Corp.
2002 Stock Option Plan (the Option Plan) on January 16, 2002;



WHEREAS, on November 19, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Company amended the Option Plan to increase the number of shares of stock reserved for the issuance of stock options by 150,000 shares; and



WHEREAS, the foregoing amendment to the Option Plan was
presented to and approved by shareholders at the annual meeting in order that such plan and options awarded thereunder will qualify for certain favorable tax treatment and/or exemptive treatment from the short-swing profit recapture provisions of
Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and to comply with the criteria for listing of the Companys common stock on the Nasdaq National Market.



NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, effective as of the date of the approval of the amendment to the Option Plan by the
Companys shareholders, the Option Plan shall be amended as follows:



The first sentence of Section 8(a) of the Option Plan shall be amended to read:



Five hundred thousand (500,000) shares, subject to adjustment under paragraph (b) below, are available for purchase upon the exercise of Options granted
under this Plan.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the shareholders
of the Company has adopted this Amendment to the Pulaski Financial Corp. 2002 Stock Option Plan.



|                          |  |  |  |                         |  |                                  
|------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|ATTEST:                   |  |  |  | PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP.
|                          |  |  | 
|/s/    Christine A. Munro |  |  |  | By:                     |  | /s/    William A. Donius         
|                          |  |  |  |                         |  | For the Entire Board of Directors
#### § 213.32 Wells.

The lessee shall agree (a) to drill and produce all wells necessary to offset or protect the leased land from drainage by wells on adjoining lands not the property of the lessor, or in lieu thereof, compensate the lessor in full each month for the estimated loss of royalty through drainage: *Provided,* That during the period of supervision by the Secretary of the Interior, the necessity for offset wells shall be determined by the supervisor and payment in lieu of drilling and producing shall be with the consent of, and in an amount determined by the Secretary of the Interior; (b) at the election of the lessee to drill and produce other wells: *Provided,* That the right to drill and produce such other wells shall be subject to any system of well spacing or production allotments authorized and approved under applicable law or regulations, approved by the Secretary of the Interior and affecting the field or area in which the leased lands are situated; and (c) if the lessee elects not to drill and produce such other wells for any period the Secretary of the Interior may, within 10 days after due notice in writing, either require the drilling and production of such wells to the number necessary, in his opinion, to insure reasonable diligence in the development and operation of the property, or may in lieu of such additional diligent drilling and production require the payment on and after the first anniversary date of the lease of not to exceed $1 per acre per annum, which sum shalI be in addition to any rental or royalty herein specified.
### Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) ammonites from eastern Oregon

By: Ralph Willard Imlay

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp756

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Morri N.Y. Foods Corp., Respondent, v Leonard DeFilippo, Individually and Doing Business as Amity Wholesale, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 19]

*224Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered March 23, 2006, which, in denying plaintiffs motion for appointment of a temporary receiver, directed defendant to deposit all receivables from funds or credit extended by the plaintiff in a separate corporate bank account, and denied defendant’s cross motion to dismiss this action pending completion of discovery, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The denial of defendant’s cross motion, without prejudice to renewal, is appealable *(see Moleon v Kreisler Borg Florman Gen. Constr. Co.,*304 AD2d 337, 339 [2003]). Defendant sought dismissal on the grounds that documentary evidence demonstrated all transactions in issue involved only the corporate entity of which he was the sole shareholder and director, and that he had no personal involvement in the disputed transactions. There was evidence, however, that receivables due to the corporation, in many instances, did not pass through it, but rather were collected by defendant individually, and commissions earned by the corporation were also paid directly to him or his wife.

The court appropriately directed the parties each to set up a bank account to deposit all receivables derived from funds or credit extended by the opposing party. Such moneys were specifically identifiable, and their loss was likely during the pendency of the action, as evident from defendant’s averments that he was spending such funds for separate business needs *(see*CPLR 6401 [a]; *Meurer v Meurer,*21 AD2d 778 [1964]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
# C_2007042EN.01004401.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/44

---

Action brought on 5 January 2007 — Sanofi-Aventis v OHIM — AstraZeneca (EXANTIN)

(Case T-4/07)

(2007/C 42/77)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Sanofi-Aventis SA (Paris, France) (represented by: R. Gilbey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: AstraZeneca AB (Södertälje, Sweden)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal dated 10 October 2006, case R 1302/2005-1, and uphold the appellant's contention that there exists a likelihood of confusion between the marks in conflict; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal dated 10 October 2006, case R 1302/2005-1, and uphold the appellant's contention that there exists a likelihood of confusion between the marks in conflict;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to bear the costs of the appellant in the present instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to bear the costs of the appellant in the present instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: AstraZeneca AB

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘EXANTIN’ for goods in class 5 — application No 2 694 115

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The international and national word marks ‘ELOXATIN’ and ‘ELOXATINE’ for goods in class 5

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The Board of Appeal failed to identify the relevant public in its entirety, and erroneously established a hierarchy of attentiveness between the sections of the relevant public that it identified.

Pleas in law:

Furthermore, the Board of Appeal failed to apply the appropriate criteria in comparing the goods and failed to compare the signs globally. Consequently the Board of Appeal erroneously held that there was no likelihood of confusion.

---
#### § 700.703 Authority.

It is within the authority of the Commissioner on Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation to administer the New Lands added to the Navajo Reservation pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 6-10(d)-10.
Khomeini's Incorporation of the Iranian Military
Mark Roberts
**NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY
**McNair Paper 48**
January 1996

1.	HISTORY
2.	PRE-REVOLUTIONARY IRAN
3.	THE SHAH'S DEPARTURE 
4.	PURGE OF THE MONARCHISTS
5.	IDEOLOGICAL PURGE
6.	THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR
7.	CONCLUSION
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

*Return to NDU Homepage *INSS Homepage *What's New*****
FIRE STATION #4

123

125

SCHOOL BUS

SCHOOL BUS

Wildfires: Protect Yourself

and Your Community

Community Preparedness

Work with your neighbors to protect your community 

from wildfires by following these preparedness tips:

125

Follow evacuation 

instructions from 

your local emergency 

officials. 

Hold community 

meetings and work 

with neighbors to 

prepare the 

neighborhood for 

wildfires.

FA-337 / April 2017

Practice two ways out of your 

neighborhood; you will be more 

prepared if roads are blocked. 

Make sure driveways 

and house numbers 

are clearly marked 

and can be seen 

from the road. 

Meet with your local fire 

department. Find out 

how department 

personnel can help you 

prepare for wildfires.

Always stay aware of your environment, and when asked to leave by your local emergency officials, 

please do so. A delay could cost your life!

Please visit the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Toolkit at www.usfa.fema.gov/WUI_toolkit, which is designed to 

assist fire departments to prepare for, respond to, and educate themselves and their communities about wildfire risks.

For more information, visit www.usfa.fema.gov/prevention/outreach/wildfire.html.

FA-337 / October 2017
100 feet

Important Documents

1

1

ONE 1

1

ONE DOLLAR

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1

1

ONE 1

1

ONE DOLLAR

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1

1

ONE 1

1

ONE DOLLAR

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Important Documents

1

1

ONE 1

1

ONE DOLLAR

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1

1

ONE 1

1

ONE DOLLAR

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1

1

ONE 1

1

ONE DOLLAR

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Wildfires: Protect Yourself

and Your Community

Personal Responsibility

You can protect your family and home from wildfires 

by following these safety tips:

Make and frequently practice 

a family evacuation plan that 

includes meeting locations, 

a communication plan and 

pet accommodations. 

Use building and yard 

materials that won’t 

burn easily.

Keep an area up to 100

feet around your home

lean, clean and green. 

Create an emergency 

bag of personal items 

that you will need if 

you are asked to 

leave your home.

Clean your roof, gutters and 

deck of dead leaves and pine 

needles often.

Leave your home 

when asked to do so.