1 **SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters at**  **Major Sources of HAP 1.**  **Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title of the Information Collection**  NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters at Major Sources of HAP (40 CFR part 63, Subpart DDDDD) **1(b) Short Characterization/ Abstract**  This supporting statement addresses information collection activities that will be imposed by the NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters at Major Sources of HAP , 40 CFR part 63 subpart DDDDD ( Boiler MACT/Boilers NESHAP ). On September 13, 2004, under authority of section 112 of the Clean Air Act, EPA promulgated national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for new and existing industrial/commercial/institutional boilers and process heaters. On June 19, 2007, th e United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated and remanded the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for industrial/commercial/institutional boilers and process heaters. On June 4, 2010 EPA issued a propo sal in response to the vacatur and in March 2011 EPA promulgated the rule in response to the vacatur . Also in March 2011, EPA issued a voluntary reconsideration of the final rule and this I CR documents the recordkeeping and reporting requirements associated with EPA’s proposed reconsideration for the Boiler MACT. The information collection activities in this information collection request (ICR) include initial and annual stack tests, fuel anal ys es, operating parameter monitoring, one

- time and periodic reports, and maintenance of records. Varyinglevels of requirem ents apply to each subcategory . The Boiler MACT contains nineteen subcategories for existing boilers and in

direct fired process heaters : Pulverized coal/solid fossil fuel units; Stokers designed to burn coal/solid fossil fuel; Fluidized bed units designe d to burn coal/solid fossil fuel; Stokers/sloped grate/other units designed to burn kiln dried biomass/bio

- based solids; Stokers/sloped grate/other units designed to burn wet biomass/bio

- based solids; Fluidized bed units designed to burn biomass/bio

- based solid s ; Suspension burners designed to burn biomass/bio

- based solid s ; Dutch ovens/pile burners designed to burn biomass/bio

- based solid s ; Fuel Cells designed to burn biomass/bio

- based solid s ; Hy brid suspension/grate burners designed to burn wet biomass/bio

based solid s ; Units designed to burn solid fuel; Units designed to burn liquid fuel; Units designed to burn heav y liquid fuel; Units designed to burn light liquid fuel; Units designed to burn liquid fuel in non

- continental States or territories; Units des igned to burn natural gas, refinery gas or other gas 1 fuels; Units designed to burn gas 2 (other) gases; Metal process furnaces; and Limited

- use boilers and process heaters. These same 19 sub categories apply to new boilers and in

- direct fired process heaters. The information collection activities will enable EPA to2

determine initial and continuous compliance with emission standards for regulated pollutants, and ensure that facilities conduct proper planning, operation, and unit maintenance. Records and reports required by the NESHAP for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters at major sources of HAP are necessary to enable EPA to identify sources subject to the s tandards and to ensure that the standards are being achieved. Records and reports must be maintained at the facility and/or submitted to EPA. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority . In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Approximately 14,111 existing units at 1, 704 facilities and 1,844 new units at 231 facilities would be subject to the regulation over the ne xt three years. The cost of this In formation Collection Request (ICR) will be $2 91 million (rounded). The burden to the “Affected Public” for each boiler subcategory may be found in Tables 1.A

- 12.C in Attachment A. The burden to the “Federal Government” is attributed entirel y to work performed b y federal employees or government contractors; this burden may be found in Tables 13.A

- 13.C of Attachment B. **2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardou s air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. Inaddition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, an d in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y re quire. In the Administrator's judgment, pollutant emissions from industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP are proposed for3

this source category

at 40 CFR part 63, subpart DDDDD. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The information will be used by EPA to: (1) Identify

new, modified, reconstructed and existing sources subject to the Boiler MACT ; (2) ensure that the Boiler MACT is being properl y applied; (3) ensure that the Boiler MACT is being complied with; (4) ensure, on a continuous basis, that the operating parameters established during the initial performance test are not exceeded. In addition, records and reports are necessary to enable EPA to identify facilities that may not be in compliance with the Boiler MACT . Based on reported information, EPA will decide which facilities should be inspected and what records or units should be inspected at the facilities. The records that facilities maintain will indicate to EPA whether facility personnel are properl y operating and maintaining the boiler or process heater and control equipment. **3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria** The requested recordkeeping and reporting will be required under (40 CFR part 63, subpart DDDDD ). **3(a) Nonduplication** If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, no duplication exists. **3(b) Public Notice Required Pr ior to ICR Submission to OMB**  A public notice of this collection was provided in the notice of proposed rul emaking for the 2011 reconsideration of the Boilers NESHAP

. **3(c) Consultations** In July 2008, the EPA issued a survey , entitled “Information Collection Effort for Facilities with Combustion Units (ICR No. 2286.01).” This ICR was distributed to 3,396 facilities with boilers and process heaters firing any fuel ty pe and other combustion units firing non - fossil solids. In May 2009, the EPA issued a follow

- up I CR (ICR No 2286.03) requesting a subset of these facilities to conduct stack testing to fill data gaps. Throughout each of these two ICRs, the Agency

received comments on the estimated costs to conduct stack testing and fuel anal ys is, and the ty

pes of pollutants to request testing from. These comments have been incorporated into the estimates for the ICR on the proposed Boiler MACT

.4

In January

2009, the EPA convened a panel, in compliance with the Small Business Regulatory

Fairness Act (SBREF A) to request input about the proposed Boiler and Process Heater NESHAP and the Area Source Boiler NESHAP. During this SBREFA panel EPA received comments from panel members on the cost estimates for work practice standards being proposed in the rulemaking. The comments on the cost to conduct energy audits at industrial facilities have been incorporated into the cost estimates contained in this ICR. The public was also provided the opportuni ty to review and comment on the burden estimated in this Informatio n Collection Request during the comment period for the June 4, 2010 proposal (75 FR 32006). As part of this reconsideration, w e have reviewed these comments and have revised our inventory of affected units in response to comments received, which has in turn increased the number of facilities estimated to have a burden related to this rulemaking. Further, in response to public comments and petitions for reconsideration, w e have also adopted several changes to the compliance requirements in the proposed reconsideration notice to minimize the burden on affected entities. Significant items that have reduced the burden on affected entities include :

 R emoval of dioxin/furan e mission limits and associated stack testing

. Instead , each boiler and process heater is now required to conduct a tune
- up work practice

.  For the other gaseous fuel specification anal ys is, H 2 S analy sis is no longer required and only Hg must be tested. Further, we have provided additional allowances on the fuel specification to exempt units firing gaseous streams subject to other NESHAP standards from the specification requirements in an effort to reduce duplication.  Continuous monitoring of PM emissions f or large units ha s been modified from a continuous emissions monitoring s ys tem (CEMS) to a continuous parametric monitoring sy stem ( CPMS). Further, these CPMS are now onl y required for a subset of boilers with an average annual heat input rate of greater than 250 mmBtu/hr from solid fossil fuel and

/or residual oil.  F or solid fuel units an alternative compliance option of meeting a total selected metals (TSM8) limit instead of a PM limit is provided to increase regulatory flexibility and reduce the burden.  Also to increase regulatory flexibility , we have proposed long

- term CO CEMS based emission limits. Because it is unknown at this time how many units will opt to comply with the CEMS

- based emission limits vs. the annual stack

- test based emission limits, the burden associated with this CO CEMS compliance alternative is not discussed or estimated in this I CR.  For very

small (less than 5 mmBtu/hr) gaseous and light liquid units, we have reduced the tune

- up frequency in order to reduce the overall long term burden of this rule. Since this initial I CR captures the burden associated with the initial tune

- up, the benefits of the reduced frequency is not estimated in this initial I CR.  For the burden to the agency , two additional line items were added to more appropriatel y account for the costs; the activity of reviewing and approving both a monitoring plan and fuel monitoring plan.5

The preamble and proposed reconsideration notice discuss the significant changes made since the March 2011 promulgat ed rule

. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  For sources with applicable emission limits, the Boilers NESHAP provides the option of demonstrating compliance through initial and periodic fuel anal ys is (for sources that burn fuels with pollutant contents lower than the emission limits) or through initial and annual stack testing. If a source can demonstrate that the fuel(s) burned in the boiler or process heater has a pollutant content that is less than the applicable emission limit, then the Boilers NESHAP require s that the source conduct initial fuel analy ses, periodic fuel analy sis, and initial and semiannual reporting. Sources that demonstrate compliance through performance testing must continuously monitor operating parameters and conduct periodic fuel analy se s, and complete initial and semiannual reporting. The EPA chose the frequency of these activities to provide an adequate margin of assurance that affected facilities will not operate for extended periods in violation of the regulations. The annual perfor

mance testing, where applicable, will ensure, on an ongoing basis, that the air pollution control device is operating properly and its performance has not deteriorated. During the initial stack tests (for particulate matter (or total selected m etals) , mercury , hydrogen chloride, and carbon monoxide ), the owner or operator must establish maximum or minimum values for each applicable operating parameter. Thereafter, the owner or operator must, in some cases, conduct annual stack tests for particulate matter (or total selected metals) , mercury , hydrogen chloride , and carbon monoxide and must alway s continuously monitor the operating parameters. The activities associated with setting these site

- specific operating limits include monitoring of the parameters during the performance test, reviewing and averaging the monitoring data, and, if necessary , calculating average values for fuel pollutant content. Although continuous monitoring of operating parameters cannot provide a direct measurement of emissions, it is less expensive than CEMS and the collected information can ensure that the boiler or process heater and associated air pollution control equipment are operated properl y. This information assures EPA and the public that the reductions envisioned by the Boilers NESHAP are being achieved. Less frequent monitoring would not ensure continuous compliance. In addition to demonstrating compliance with these emission limits, all large boilers and process heaters must conduct annual tune

- ups as a work practice for controlling dioxin/furan emissions

. They

must report the findings of the tune

- up in the semi

- annual compliance report covering the period when the tune

- up was conducted. The semiannual reporting requirement allows the submittal of re quired information and data on established operating parameters so that any potential problems can be identified in a timely fashion. New and e xisting small (less than 10 mmBtu/hr) boilers firing solid, liquid , or gaseous fuels and all limited use (operat e s less than 876 hr/y r) boilers demonstrate compliance with the rule by conducting a biennial tune

- up. Certain small units firing gaseous or light liquid fuels that have a design capacity

of less than 5 mmBtu/hr are subject to tune

- ups on a 5
- ye ar frequen cy .6

Since th e s e frequenc ies are less than the semi

- annual compliance report frequency typicall y required from sources in this source category , a biennial or five

- ye ar compliance report is required

. These tune

- up reports can be requested by the Administrator upon request but are not required to be submitted. New and existing large Gas 1 boilers demonstrate compliance b y conducting an annual tune
- up. These boilers are thus required to submit annual compliance reports. Units firing gaseous fuels other than natural gas and refinery gas or other MACT regulated gas streams must demonstrate that those fuels meet the specification for Hg contained in the proposal in order to qualify under the Gas 1 subcategory . I f the content of these constituents are not going to exceed the specifications, these units may conduct an initial testing and include a statement that the gas will not exceed the specification in the initial Notification of Compliance Status. If the gaseous fuel constituents will vary , the unit is required to conduct monthly testing and maintain records to demonstrate that the gaseous fuels meet the specifications. Monthly testing and recordkeeping at units with variable gas quality ensures continuous compliance. **3(e) General Guidelines** T hese reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. The Boilers NESHAP requires all records to be maintained at the source for a period of five years. In 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, “General Provisions for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories,” owners or operators of facilities are required to keep and maintain records for a period of five ye ars. These records must be kept on file for use, if needed, b y the regulating authority to ensure that the plant personnel are operating and maintaining the unit and the control equipment properl y. The title V permit programs also require records to be retained for five ye ars. These reco rds must be kept on file for use, if needed, b y the regulating authority to ensure that the plant personnel are operating and maintaining the unit and the control equipment properly

. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended b y 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). In response to public comments with respect to concerns of confidential information contained in the energy assessment report, EPA has modified the requirements to submit the e ntire results in order to protect potential confidential business information. Instead a signed certification that the energy assessment was completed is to be included in the Notification of Compliance Status. **3(g) Sensitive Questions** T he reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive7

questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4(a) Respondents/** **NAICS Codes**  The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners or operators of new or existing industrial, commercial, or institutional boilers and process heaters

. The Boilers Major Source NESHAP affects any industry , state, local, or tribal government, or any institution (e.g., university) using a boiler as defined in the regulation. This includes, but is not limited to, the following North American Industry Classification System (NAI CS) codes listed in Table 1 below.

**Table 1**  **: NAICS Categories for Various Affected Sources NAICS Codes**  **NAICS Codes**  211 Extractors of crude petroleum or natural gas. 321 Wood product manufacturing. 322 Pulp and paper mills. 325 Chemical manufacturers. 324 Petroleum refineries and manufacturers of coal products. 316/326/339 Manufacturers of rubber and miscellaneous plastic products. 331 Steel works, blast furnaces. 332 Electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring. 336 Manufacturers of motor vehicle parts and accessories. 221 Electric, gas, and sanitary services. 622 Health services. 611 Educational services Based on the distribution of major source facilities with affected boilers or process heaters reported in the 2008 survey entitled “ In formation Collection Effort for Facilities with Combustion Units (IC R No. 2286.01),” along with additional information submitted there are 1, 704 existing facilities with affected boilers or process heaters. Of these, 94 percent are located in the private sector and the remaining 6 percent are located in the public sector. The agency is p roj ecting8

231 new facilities with 1,844 affected boilers and process heaters. For the purpose of this ICR, t he EPA is estimating that all new facilities will be in the private sector. Considering new and existing sources together, 9 4 percent of facilitie s are estimated to be in the private sector. **4(b) Information Requested (i) Data Items**  In this ICR, all the data that is recorded or reported will be required b y (40 CFR part 63, Subpart DDDDD). In Attachment B, tables 1.A

- C, 2.A

- C, 3.A

- C, 4.A

- C, 5.A

- C, 6.A

- C, 7.A

- C, 8.A

- C, 9.A

C, 10.A

- C, 11.A

- C, and 12.A

- C present a summary of the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements of the Boiler MACT

.

**(ii) Respondent Activities** The respondent activities proposed b y Boiler MACT are provided under the first column of tables 1.A

- 12.C. All respondent burden items are included in tables 1.A

- 12.C.

**(iii) Summary of Requirements** The information collection activities in this I CR include initial and annual sta ck tests, fuel anal ys es, operating parameter monitoring, continuous O 2 monitoring for all large units, CPMS at units with an average annual heat input rate greater than 250 mmBtu/hr from solid fossil fuel or residual oil , certified energy audits, annual , biennial , or every five

- ye ar tune
- ups (depending on the size of the combustion equipment) and a site

- specific monitoring plan, one

- time and periodic reports, and the maintenance of records. For sources that can demonstrate compliance through f uel anal ys is, the regulation requires an initial fuel analy sis and monthl y fuel analy ses. Sources must conduct additional fuel anal ys es if they

burn a new ty

pe of fuel. For sources that are demonstrating that their gaseous fuels other than natural gas, re finery gas , and MACT

- regulated gases meet the specification for Hg contained in the rule, they must conduct either an initial or monthly fuel anal ys is to remain in the gas 1 subcategory . If the content of these constituents are not going to exceed the spec ifications, these units may conduct an initial testing and include a statement that the gas will not exceed the specification in the initial Notification of Compliance Status. If the gaseous fuel constituents will vary , the unit is required to conduct monthly testing and maintain records to demonstrate that the gaseous fuels meet the specifications. An initial performance test must be completed for particulate matter (or total selected metals) , mercury , hydrogen chloride, and carbon monoxide for affected sources with applicable emission limits. During the initial performance test, the owner or operator must establish maximum or minimum values for each operating parameter. Thereafter, the owner or operator must, in some cases, conduct annual stack tests for particulate matter (or total selected metals) , mercury , hydrogen chloride , and carbon monoxide and must continuously monitor the operating9

parameters. Following the initial performance test, the owner or operator must submit a report that documents the performance test results and the values for their required operating parameters. All existing units will be required to conduct an initial certified energy audit by qualified personnel which includes a visual inspection of the boiler s ys tem , establishing operating characteristics, identifying major energy consuming s ys tems and energy savings potential, reviewing available engineering plans, and listing major energy conservation measures. A signed certification that an audit has been complete d should be submitted to the Agency for each energy audit. All new and existing large units must perform annual tune

- ups. This is a work practice for dioxin/furan emissions to ensure proper boiler operation. All new and existing small and limited use units, and all large units firing natural gas , refinery gas , or other gas 1 fuels meeting the fuel spec can demonstrate compliance by conducting a tune
- up of the boiler. Small and limited use units are requested to conduct a tune

up biennially , large natural gas , refinery gas , or other gas 1 units will conduct a tune

- up annually , and very small units firing gaseous fuels or light liquids are requested to conduct a tune

- up every five years. An y large natural gas , refinery gas , or other gas 1 unit will also submit a notification of alternative fuel use if the unit fires alternative fuels during periods of gas curtailment or gas supply emergencies. For all units other than small and limited use boilers and process heaters and units firing natural gas a semiannual report is required that documents the values for the operating parameters; any deviation; the results of any annual stack tests; the results of any fuel anal ys is and emissions calculations; fuel usage, and if no deviation occurred, a statement that no deviations occurred. As specified in the Boiler and Process Heater NESHAP, owners or operators of boilers and process heaters must keep records of certain parameters and information for a period of five ye ars. Owners or operators must maintain re cords of the initial performance test, annual stack tests, fuel anal ys es, and any subsequent stack tests or fuel analy ses. Owners or operators must also maintain records of the monitoring data for the operating parameters and daily fuel usage. Owners or operators must also maintain records for periods of boiler or process heater startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) and any deviations from the operating parameters. Records must also be maintained of all monitoring device calibration data. For startup and shutdown (SS) periods , as part of the work practice it is necessary to train all personnel in startup and shutdown procedures , including maintenance and cleaning, safety, control device startup, and procedures to minimize emissions

. This training is in cluded in line item 4.E of the burden tables . Although this training line item broadl y covers training on the rule recordkeeping and reporting requirements, it is expected to be sufficient to cover training necessary for SS recordkeeping training. Many sit es are already expected to undergo SS training for health and safety reasons.10

**5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** A list of agency

activities is provided in section 6(c) and in tables 13A

- C (see Attachment B). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Data obtained during periodic visits by EPA personnel, from records maintained by the respondents, and from inform ation provided in semiannual reports will be tabulated and published for internal EPA use in compliance and enforcement programs. The Boiler MACT allows records to be retained in hardcop y or electronic format to allow flexibility and minimize burden. Mos t emissions and monitoring information in the reports are reported in an electronic format using the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). The data will be extracted from the ERT files and can be viewed through EPA’s Central Data Exchange. Other information contained in the reports is entered into the AFS which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. AFS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately

125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** The EPA expects that the Boilers and Process Heater NESHAP will have a substantial impact on a significant number of small entities. In developing the regulation, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business according to Small Business Administration size standards by the North American Industry Classification S ys tem (NAICS) category of the owning entity . The rang e of small business size standards for the 4 5 affected 3

- digit NAICS industries ranges from 500 to 1,000 employees, except for petroleum refining and electric utilities. In these latter two industries, the size standard is 1,500 employees and a mass throu ghput of 75,000 barrels/day or less or 4 million kilowatt

- hours of production or less, respectively ; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a population of less than 50,0 00; and (3) a small organization that is any not
- for

- profit enterprise that is independently

owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. Based on responses to the 2008 survey “Information Collection Effort for Facilities with Combustion Units (IC R No. 2286.01)” as well as follow

-up information submitted to the docket, the EPA has determined that 1 51 of the 1, 704 facilities with existing boilers or process heaters, or 9 percent of the total, affected by the regulation may be small entities

.11

The Boilers NESHAP does not contain any provisions reserved exclusively for the benefit of small entities. However, the regulation does contain several provisions that reduce the impact on all regulated entities, which include small entities. For instance, operating parameter monitoring is required instead of CEMS. T he rule provides an option to demonstrate compliance with fuel anal ys is in lieu of stack testing for boilers combusting fuels with mercury , TSM8, or chlorine contents less than th eir associated emission limit. Inaddition, providing a work practice standard for small and limited use boilers and process heaters firing all fuel ty pes and for boilers of all sizes firing natural gas , refinery gas , or other gas 1 fuels , the EPA has sub stantially reduced the burden of the rulemaking, including reducing the burden on small entities. For example, 3 5 of the 1 51 small entities have onl y small or limited use boilers and process heaters installed at the facilities. The option to demonstrate co mpliance using an annual , biennial , or every five

- ye ar tune
- up is a substantial savings compared with the requiring stack testing , parameter monitoring, and add

- on air pollution control devices. **5(d) Collection Schedule** In formation collected includes th e following one

- time

- only activities: reading the regulation, initial performance tests (for particulate matter (or TSM8) , mercury , hydrogen chloride , and carbon monoxide for units with applicable emission limits), initial fuel anal ys es (for mercury , TSM8, and chlorine for units demonstrating compliance using fuel anal ys is) , setting of operating parameter values, report prior to initial startup, report following initial stack tests (includes operating parameter values), conducting an energy audit, and devel opment of a site

- specific monitoring plan and fuel anal ys is plan. Since compliance is not required until year 3 for existing facilities, EPA assumes that half of the existing facilities will conduct initial performance tests and related activities in year 2 and the other half will conduct such activities in ye ar 3. Year 1 for new and existing sources includes the one

- time activity of reading the regulation and submitting the initial notification that the source is subject to the regulation. The burden associated with this activity is estimated on a facility basis. The database developed from the 2008 survey “Information Collection Effort for Facilities with Combustion Units (ICR No. 2286.01),” and subsequent public comments to adjust the inventory indicates that each affected facility has on average eight boilers or process heaters . This is a conservative estimate of recordkeeping and reporting burden, as EPA knows that some of the affected facilities have more than eight sources and will be able to benefit from consolidated reporting. New major sources would also submit the following one

- time only notifications: intent to construct, start of construction date, anticipated start

- up date, and actual start

- up date. These notifications generall y would be submitted within 60 day s of the activity

. In ye ar 1, new facilities will begin training their personnel regarding the use of monitoring equipment and the startup and shutdown procedures . Half of the existing facilities will train personnel in ye ar 2 and the other half will train personnel in year 3. Also in year 1, new sources will begin activities to comply with the subpart such as conducting performance tests , conducting tune

- ups, setting operating limits, developing a site

-12

specific monito ring plan and fuel analy sis plan, installing and operating applicable monitoring equipment, and submitting the notification of compliance status. In ye ar 2, the new sources from year 1 will conduct annual performance tests, tune
- ups, and submit semiannual compliance reports and the new sources in ye ar 2 will conduct initial performance tests , tune
- ups, and other initial compliance activities and will also submit all initial notifications. Also in year 2, half of the existing large affected sources will co nduct initial performance tests, fuel analy ses, certified energy audits, tune
- ups, related activities, and submit initial notifications of compliance status. Half of the existing small and limited use affected sources will conduct certified energy audits and tune

- ups. In ye ar 3, the new sources from year 1 and from year 2 and half of the existing sources that began compl yi ng with the subpart in year 2 will conduct annual performance tests, if applicable, annual tune

- ups, and will submit semia nnual compliance reports. The new sources from year 3 will conduct pe rformance tests, tune
- ups, and fuel analy ses. Also in year 3, the other half of existing affected sources for which testing is required will conduct performance tests, fuel anal ys es, tune
- ups, and certified energy audits

. The remaining half of existing small and limited use sources will conduct initial tune

- ups and certified energy audits. Finally , in year 3 all facilities with affected boilers or process heaters will submit the no ti fication of compliance status and those required to submit semi

- annual compliance reports will begin submitting these in year 3. In ye ar 1, new sources will begin keeping records of data such as operating limits , start
up shutdown and malfunctions, tune
- u p procedures, monitoring device calibrations, stack test results, submitted reports, and fuel usage. In ye ar 2, the new sources from years 1 and 2 will keep records of such data. In year 3, all new and existing affected facilities will keep records of su ch data. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Tables 1.A

- 12.C document the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for each year for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be $ 97.1 million . The average annual recordkeeping hours shown in Tables 1.A

- 12.C is 82,000 . The average annual reporting requirement hours shown in Tables 1.A

- 12.A is 24 5 ,000 . These hours are based on Agency studies and background13

documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, and any comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $114. 49 ($54. 52 + 110%) Technical $9 8

. 20 ($46. 76 + 110%) Clerical $48. 53 ($2 3

. 11 + 110%) To be consistent with previous estimates of burden for this rulemaking, these rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2009, “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by

occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, ” Total compensation

. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard(s) are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this I CR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring , hiring third party contractors to perform stack tests, energy audits, and boiler tune

- ups . The capital/startup costs are one

- time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor(s) conduct subsequent testing or tune

- ups, and o ther costs such as photocopying and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs** Costs associated with O&M include the annual operation and maintenance costs associated with the continuous parameter monitoring equipment, initial and annual stack and performance testing and/or fuel analy sis, and certified energy audits and/or annual/biennial tune
ups. Below are the estimated total annualized capital and startup costs and O&M costs for the affected units for the first 3 years a fter promulgation.

**Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**
(A) Boiler Type (B)

Number of Respondents (facilities) (C)

Total Annualized Capital and O&M over 3 years (D) Total Capital/Startup Cost over 3 years (E)

Average Annual O&M and Annualized Capital Costs per year14

Existing Large Solid Units 131 $ 97,104,012 $92,478,324 $ 32,368,004 New Large Solid Units 10 $10,094,916 $6,015,594 $3,364,972 Existing Small and Limited Use Solid Units 5 $171,668 $0 $57,223
New Small Solid Units 1 $17,824 $0 $5,941 Existing Large Liquid Units 71 $23,343,893 $27,305,301 $7,781,298 New Large Liquid Units 0 $0 $0 $0 Existing Small and Limited Use Liquid Units 43 $1,484,008 $0 $494,669
New Small Liquid Units 0 $0 $0 $0 Existing Large Gaseous Units 549 $32,519,633 $478,101 $10,839,878 New Large Gaseous Units 98 $4,516,625 $0 $1,505,542 Existing Small and Limited Use Gaseous Units 905 $26,484,361 $0 $8,828,120
New Small Gaseous Units 122 $ 2,896,400 $0 $ 965,467 Total 1,935 $ 198,633,340 $126,277,320 $ 66,211,113 The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $ 1 26 million . This is the total o f column D in the above table. This reflects the initial costs to purchase monitoring equipment. The total operation and maintenance (O& M) costs for this I CR are $ 19 9 million

. This is the total of column C

. This reflects the costs to operate the monitoring equipment, and fees paid to third parties to conduct initial and annual stack testing, tune

- ups, and one

- time energy audits. The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 6 6 million as shown in column E
. These are recordkeeping costs. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost**  The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maintained by the respondents , periodic inspection of sources of15

emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 5.3 million

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2010 General Schedule, which exclud es locality

rates of pay . The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees . **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** The total number of respondents is referred to as the respondent universe. The respondent universe for this I CR is based on the EPA’s population database of industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters. Industry burden is calculated based on 14,111 existing units in the database, however, many units have minimal reporting requirements (i.e., initial reporting requirement) and many other units have no requirements under the Boilers NES HAP. Approximately 1,844 new units will be con structed or reconstructed, but many of those sources are projected to be gas

- fired and will have minimal or no requirements. Units that demonstrate continuous compliance through continuous parameter monitoring must establish a site

- specific monitoring plan. A table showing the estimated number of sources for each category is shown below. **Table 2**  **Number of Responses for New and Existing Units**

(A) Boiler Type (B)

Number of Respondents (facilities) (C)

Total Number Responses for 3

- year Period (D)

Average Annual Number of Responses Existing Large Solid Units 131 655 218 New Large Solid Units 10 62 21 Existing Small Solid Units 5 18 6 New Small Solid Units 1 4 1 Existing Large Liquid Units 71 355 118 New Large Liquid Units 0 0 016

16 (A) Boiler Type (B)

Number of Respondents (facilities) (C)

Total Number Responses for 3

- year Period (D)

Average Annual Number of Responses Existing Small Liquid Units 43 151 50 New Small Liquid Units 0 0 0 Existing Large Gaseous Units 549 3,001 1000 New Large Gaseous Units 98 396 132 Existing Small Gaseous Units 905 3,168 1056 New Small Gaseous Units 122 328 109 * Some responses are one - time only requirements and do not occur each year. Initial one

- time requirements are included in the annual average for this ini tial 3

- year ICR period. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost cal culations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1.A

- 12.C and 13.A

- 13.C in Appendix A and B respectivel y, and summarized below.

**(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 327,000

. Details regarding these estimates may be found in tables 1.A

- 12.C in Appendix A. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response . The total annual capital/startup and O& M costs to the regulated entity are $ 66 million

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

**(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 101, 4 00 labor hours at a cost of $ 5. 3 million . See tables 13.A

- C in Appendix B. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** The decrease in burden from the I CR associated with the March 2011 promulgation and17

17 this proposed reconsideration IC R is due to changes in the proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements, despite an increase in the boiler population

. There were increases of 271 existing boilers and 1,205 additional new boiler s as a result of new data added from p ublic comments and revised projections of biomass and natural gas fuel consumption in the industrial and commercial sectors
. However, in this proposed reconsideration, emission limits for dioxins/furans are removed, which were the most expensive component of the stack test . In lieu of a numerical limit for dioxins/furans, the cost and burden for an annual tune

- up work practice for all boilers greater than10 mmBtu/hr was added. Further, rule changes for PM CPMS requirements which now apply to onl y a subset of very

large units that are firing solid fossil and residual fuel oil resulted in a smaller number of PM CPMS expected to be installed. Addi ti onally , based on a revised dataset, the subcategories have been adjusted and the MACT floor limits have been edited since the March 2011 promulgation. These edits have reduced the number of expected control devices needed to meet the limits and their associated monitoring burden. Further, the inclusion of an alternative TSM8 emission limit affected the number o f units required to install PM/TSM8 controls and associated parameter monitoring. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to be 120 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize techn ology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and re quirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a perso n is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this informati on, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2002

- 005 8

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, an d to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically . When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,18

18 Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 1927

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Bud get, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- O AR

- 200 2

- 0058 in an y correspondence. **Part B of the Supporting Statement** This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.