alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Online Transactions: My Pension Benefit Access (MyPBA) FAQs 
-  Update Address or Other Personal Information 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Update Address or Other Personal Information

The information below is for workers and retirees who need to update their personal information on file with PBGC.

## Why

                          - If you move, change your name, telephone number, or email, or discover PBGC has incorrect information about you, we need this new information to stay in touch with you. 

## How

                          - Use our online service,  My Pension Benefit Access (MyPBA)  and chose the option to update your personal information.
                          - Download and complete our  PBGC Change of Address Form  and return it via mail (below) or fax to 202-229-4047.

### OR

                          - Call PBGC’s Customer Contact Center at 1-800-400-7242. Please visit the  Contact Us page  for hours of operation.                               - TTY/ASCII users may call 711.
                            - Remember to have your Social Security number, plan name, and case number ready so the customer service representative is better able to help you. 

### OR

                          - Write to us at:  PBGC  PO Box 151750  Alexandria, VA 22315-1750
                          - Name changes  require that you submit a copy of one of the following: marriage certificate, divorce decree, amended or corrected birth certificate, or court order or other legal document.
                          - Social Security number changes  require that you submit a copy of one of the following: a Social Security card showing the correct SSN and the same name used PBGC's records, documentation from the Social Security Administration confirming the SSN with the same name used PBGC's records, or an earnings record from the Social Security Administration showing your SSN and earnings under your PBGC-covered plan.

May 21, 2021

##           Contact Us      

Visit our Contact Us page for more information.
§ 115.93 Audits of standards. ( a ) During the three-year period starting on July 6. 2015, and during each three-year period thereafter, the agency shall ensure that each immigration detention facility that has adopted these standards is audited at least once.
( b ) The agency may require an expedited audit if the agency has reason to believe that a particular facility may be experiencing problems relating to sexual abuse. The agency may also include referrals to resources that may assist the facility with PREA-related issues.
( c ) Audits under this section shall be conducted pursuant to §§ 115.201 through 115.205.
( d ) Audits under this section shall be coordinated by the agency with the DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, which may request an expedited audit if it has reason to believe that an expedited audit is appropriate.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

86-12 

May 23, 1986 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4206(b)(1) Adjustment for Partial Withdrawal. Reduction of Liability for Subsequent Withdrawal

4219(c)(1)(E) Notice and Collection of Withdrawal Liability. Partial Withdrawal Liability Payments 

OPINION: 

This responds to your request for the opinion of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation regarding the application

of sections 4206(b)(1) and 4219 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), to the

computation of the annual payments owed by an employer that has incurred successive partial withdrawals. 

Your letter presents as an example an employer that has experienced two partial withdrawals under section

4205(a)(2), the first in 1983 and the second in 1984. You note that section 4219(c)(1)(E) clearly provides the proper

method for calculating the annual payment for the first partial withdrawal. You observe, however, that if that same

method is used for calculating the annual payment for the second partial withdrawal, the total of the two annual payments

may, of a period, exceed the annual payments the employer would have owed for a complete withdrawal. You suggest

two alternative methods of calculating the annual payment for the second partial withdrawal [*2] that would avoid this

result. 

We agree that section 4219(c)(1)(E) can be read to require, under certain circumstances, total annual partial

withdrawal liability payments that exceed the annual payments that the employer would have been required to make for

a complete withdrawal. However, as you observe, this result seems inconsistent with the legislative history on annual

partial withdrawal liability payments. We are therefore not prepared to say at this time that the proper interpretation of

section 4219(c)(1)(E) would produce this result. 

We are planning to issue a proposed regulation that would address the proper method for calculating annual

payments for partial and complete withdrawals following a partial withdrawal. Section 4224 of ERISA provides that:

A multiemployer plan may adopt rules providing for other terms and conditions for the satisfaction of an employer's

withdrawal liability if such rules are consistent with this Act and with such regulations as may be prescribed by the

[PBGC]. 

Pending the PBGC's issuance of regulations on the manner in which annual payments for withdrawals following partial

withdrawals are determined, plans may thus adopt rules under section [*3] 4224 to avoid anomalous situations that might

otherwise result from the application of section 4219(c)(1)(E) so long as those rules are consistent with ERISA. After

the PBGC issues its regulations, the plan's rules must also be consistent with those regulations. 

I hope this has been of assistance. If you have further questions please contact the attorney handling this matter,

Steven Rothenberg, of the Corporate Policy and Regulations Department. His telephone number is (202) 956-5050. 

Edward R. Mackiewicz 

General Counsel
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

88-4 

March 25, 1988 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4006(a)(3)(A) - Current Rates 

29 CFR 2610.2 - Premiums; Definitions 

OPINION: 

This letter is in response to your request that the PBGC issue an opinion regarding whether a PBGC premium must

be paid for a participant in the * * * (the "Plan") even though no contributions to the Plan are likely to be required for

that participant because of a floor offset arrangement with * * * (the "ESOP"). 

From your letter, it is our understanding that the Plan is a defined benefit plan covered by the PBGC's insurance

program under ERISA. The Plan is coordinated with the ESOP so that the Plan's basic benefit is reduced by the annuity

equivalent of the participant's projected ESOP account. You project that the ESOP account will fully offset the benefit

defined by the Plan so that no contributions will need to be made to the Plan for many, if not all, of the Plan's

participants. You contend that premiums to the PBGC should not be required for participants whose benefits are fully

offset by the contributions made to the ESOP. 

ERISA § 4006(a)(3)(A), as amended by Section 9331 of the Pension Protection Act, Subtitle D of Title IX of the

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, Pub. L. No. 100-203, 101 Stat. [*2] 1330 (December 22, 1987), provides

that the annual premium rate for single-employer plans is "$ 16.00 for each individual who is a participant in such plan

during the plan year" , plus additional sums for plans with unfunded vested benefits. Under PBGC regulations, any

individual who is "earning or retaining credited service under the plan" is a plan participant. See 29 C.F.R. § 2610.2.

Clearly, the individuals covered by the Plan are participants within the meaning of 29 C.F.R. § 2610.2. Accordingly,

pursuant to ERISA § 4006(a)(3)(A), an annual premium must be paid for each individual who is covered by the Plan.

Your argument that the Plan should not be obligated to pay premiums because the risk to the PBGC is minimal or

nonexistent simply does not stand up to legal scrutiny. As noted above, Congress imposed a fixed premium of $ 16 per

participant plus an adjustable risk-related premium. Thus, in this case, the Plan would have to pay a premium of at least

$ 16 per participant, regardless of the risk the Plan poses to the PBGC. 

I hope this letter adequately answers your inquiry. If you have further questions concerning this matter please

contact John Sutter of this office [*3] at the above address or (202) 778-8823. 

Gary M. Ford 

General Counsel
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Alan D. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Shelley Goff, Secretary and CFO of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:August 19, 2008By:/s/Alan D. GordonAlan D. Gordon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  Date:August 18, 2008By:/s/Shelley GoffShelley Goff, Secretary and CFO
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NASEDRA K. LUMPKIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2781

[June 10, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline C. Shepherd, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2009-CF-005842-AXXX-MB.

Nasedra K. Lumpkin, Jasper, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 158.630 Employee recognition. ( a ) *DHS-CS employees.* In alignment with the compensation strategy in § 158.601 and the performance management program described in § 158.802 of this part, the Department may provide recognition under §§ 158.631 through 158.634, on a periodic or *ad hoc* basis, to a DHS-CS employee based on the employee's mission impact. In providing such recognition, the Department may also consider mission-related requirements and strategic talent priorities.
( b ) *Prospective employees.* In alignment with the compensation strategy in § 158.601, the Department may offer, and provide upon appointment, recognition payments under § 158.632(b) and recognition time-off under § 158.633(b), on a periodic or *ad hoc* basis, to an individual selected for employment in the DHS-CS based on: ( 1 ) The individual's CTMS qualifications determined under the assessment program described in § 158.520;
( 2 ) The individual's anticipated mission impact;
( 3 ) Mission-related requirements; and
( 4 ) Strategic talent priorities.
( c ) *Eligibility.* The Department determines eligibility for recognition under this section, §§ 158.631 through 158.634, and CTMS policy implementing this section. The Department may defer providing recognition to a DHS-CS employee under this part if the Department is in the process of determining whether the employee's performance is unacceptable, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 4301(3), or whether the employee has engaged in misconduct. If the Department determines a DHS-CS employee's performance is unacceptable, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 4301(3), or the employee receives an unacceptable rating of record under § 158.804, or the Department determines the employee has engaged in misconduct, the employee is ineligible to receive recognition under this part.
( d ) *Policy.* CTMS policy implementing this section addresses: ( 1 ) Eligibility criteria;
( 2 ) Requirements for documenting the reason and basis for recognition provided to a DHS-CS employee;
( 3 ) Appropriate levels of review and approval for providing recognition;
( 4 ) Any limitations on the total number, frequency, or amount of recognition a DHS-CS employee may receive within any specific time period;
( 5 ) Any service agreement requirements; and
( 6 ) Processes for evaluating the effectiveness of recognition in supporting the purpose of CTMS described in § 158.101, the purpose of the DHS-CS described in § 158.202, and the operationalization of the compensation strategy described in § 158.601.
( e ) *Advisory appointees.* Recognition under this part for a DHS-CS advisory appointee is subject to additional requirements and restrictions in subpart J of this part.
### §1181. Inapplicability of other sections

(a) In General.—Sections 105(d), 1101(1), 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1115, 1116, 1121, 1123(a)(8), 1123(c), 1127, 1129(a)(15), 1129(b), 1129(c), 1129(e), and 1141(d)(5) of this title do not apply in a case under this subchapter.

(b) Court Authority.—Unless the court for cause orders otherwise, paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of section 1102(a) and sections 1102(b), 1103, and 1125 of this title do not apply in a case under this subchapter.

(c) Special Rule for Discharge.—If a plan is confirmed under section 1191(b) of this title, section 1141(d) of this title shall not apply, except as provided in section 1192 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 116–54, §2(a), Aug. 23, 2019, 133 Stat. 1079.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Aug. 23, 2019, see section 5 of Pub. L. 116–54, set out as an Effective Date of 2019 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
§ 292.21 How will the Secretary evaluate a proposed gaming establishment? ( a ) The Secretary will consider all the information submitted under §§ 292.16-292.19 in evaluating whether the proposed gaming establishment is in the best interest of the tribe and its members and whether it would or would not be detrimental to the surrounding community.
( b ) If the Secretary makes an unfavorable Secretarial Determination, the Secretary will inform the tribe that its application has been disapproved, and set forth the reasons for the disapproval.
( c ) If the Secretary makes a favorable Secretarial Determination, the Secretary will proceed under § 292.22.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.47 When procuring property or services with self-determination contract funds, can an Indian tribe or tribal organization follow the same procurement policies and procedures applicable to other Indian tribe or tribal organization funds?

Indian tribes and tribal organizations shall have standards that conform to the standards in this subpart. If the Indian tribe or tribal organization relies upon standards different than those described below, it shall identify the standards it will use as a proposed waiver in the initial contract proposal or as a waiver request to an existing contract.
### [§2302. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1806(d), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4155]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 127; Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §301(b), July 29, 1958, 72 Stat. 432; Pub. L. 85–861, §1(43A), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1457; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(74), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2926; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, §2722(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1186; Pub. L. 98–525, title XII, §1211, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2589; Pub. L. 98–577, title V, §504(b)(3), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3087; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title XIII, §1343(a)(13), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3993; Pub. L. 100–26, §7(k)(2), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 284; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VIII, §853(b)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1518; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §701(d)(1), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 113; Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §805, Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1417; Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1502, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3296; Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4321(b)(3), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 672; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VIII, §§805(a)(1), 807(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2605, 2606; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VIII, §803(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1832; Pub. L. 107–217, §3(b)(2), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1295; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 111–350, §5(b)(8), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3842; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, §866(g)(1), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4298; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, §1071(a)(2), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3504; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, §815(b), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 896; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title II, §221, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1333; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §836(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1864; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1806(a)(5), (6), (b)(2)–(6), (c)(2)(A), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4152–4154, provided definitions for the chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §1831dd. Open data publication

All public data assets published by the Corporation under this chapter or under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 111–203; 124 Stat. 1376) shall be—

(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44);

(2) freely available for download;

(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.

(Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 967, §2[53], as added Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LVIII, §5832, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3431.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1376, which enacted chapter 53 (§5301 et seq.) of this title and chapters 108 (§8201 et seq.) and 109 (§8301 et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and enacted, amended, and repealed numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction Regarding No New Disclosure Requirements

Enactment of section not to be construed to require certain additional information to be collected or disclosed, see section 5834 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 1831cc of this title.
----

|   | (1) | Based on my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |  April 10, 2013 | /s/ JOHN P. AVAGLIANO   |
|--------|----------------------|-------------------------|
|   |                 | John P. Avagliano       |
|   |                 | Chief Financial Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11521-11522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4557]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-282; NRC-2011-0040]


Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 1, Northern States 
Power Company--Minnesota; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of 
Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving No Significant 
Hazards Considerations; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

[[Page 11522]]


ACTION: Notice of Issuance; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice appearing in the Federal 
Register on February 22, 2011 (76 FR 9827), which informed the public 
that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was considering the issuance of 
amendments to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-42 and DPR-60, 
respectively, for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 
and 2. This action is necessary to correct the affected Facility 
License and Docket Nos., since the amendment request applies to Unit 1 
only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Wengert, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555-0001; telephone (301) 415-4037, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5004383f3d31237e07353e37352224103e22337e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5004383f3d31237e07353e37352224103e22337e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 9827, appearing at the top of the 
second column: the title is corrected to read from ``Docket Nos. 50-282 
and 50-306, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2'' to 
``Docket No. 50-282, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 1.''

    Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of February 2011.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Thomas J. Wengert,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III-1, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-4557 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 700.337 Establishment of boundaries of life estate leases. ( a ) Prior to the issuance of a life estate lease, the Commission shall, after consultation with the Tribe upon whose land the life estate lease will be located, establish the actual configuration, shape and boundaries of the land area of the life estate lease. The present residence of the life tenant shall be within the boundaries of the life estate lease and the area of the life estate lease shall not exceed ninety (90) acres.
( b ) The following factors will be considered in establishing the configuration, shape, and boundaries of a life estate lease: ( 1 ) The location of the present residence of the applicant and the traditional land use area associated with such residence.
( 2 ) The topography and soil conditions of the land in the immediate vicinity of the applicant's present residence.
( 3 ) The location of the nearest source of water.
( 4 ) The proximity of roads.
( 5 ) Such other factors may be necessary or appropriate.
|                                |
|--------------------------------|
|                                |  |
|                           | For Immediate Release |
|                           | January 2, 2015 |
| Media Contact:                 |   |
| Casey Lassiter, 205 410-2777   |   |
| Casey.lassiter@healthsouth.com |   |
|                           |   |
| Investor Relations Contact:    |   |
| Mary Ann Arico, 205 969-6175   |   |
| maryann.arico@healthsouth.com  |   |

----