alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 158.404 Work valuation system. ( a ) The Secretary or designee establishes and administers a person-focused work valuation system to facilitate systematic management of the DHS-CS and to address internal equity among DHS-CS employees. The work valuation system is designed to reflect that: ( 1 ) The DHS cybersecurity mission is dynamic;
( 2 ) Cybersecurity work is constantly evolving; and
( 3 ) Individuals, through application of their qualifications, significantly influence how cybersecurity work is performed.
( b ) The work valuation system is based on: ( 1 ) CTMS qualifications; and
( 2 ) DHS-CS cybersecurity work.
( c ) The Department uses the work valuation system to establish work and career structures, such as work levels, titles, ranks, and specializations, and the Department uses these work and career structures for purposes of talent management under this part, such as: ( 1 ) Describing and categorizing DHS-CS employees, qualified positions, and assignments;
( 2 ) Assessing and selecting individuals for appointment to qualified positions; and
( 3 ) Compensating DHS-CS employees under this part, including establishing and administering one or more salary structures, described in § 158.611.
( d ) The Department may also use the work and career structures described in paragraph (c) of this section for budget and fiscal purposes related to administering CTMS and managing the DHS-CS.
§ 575.5 Procedures for assessment of civil fines. ( a ) Within 15 days after service of a notice of violation, or such longer period as the Chairman may grant for good cause, the respondent may submit written information about the violation to the Chairman. The Chairman shall consider any information so submitted in determining the facts surrounding the violation and the amount of the civil fine.
( b ) The Chairman shall serve a copy of the proposed assessment on the respondent within thirty (30) days after the notice of violation was issued, when practicable.
( c ) The Chairman may review and reassess any civil fine if necessary to consider facts that were not reasonably available on the date of issuance of the proposed assessment.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1023 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1023

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize indirect 
                  graduate medical education payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 1999

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Helms, Mr. 
  Kerry, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. 
   Kerrey, Mr. Levin, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Specter, Mr. Cleland, and Mr. 
   Edwards) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize indirect 
                  graduate medical education payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Graduate Medical Education Payment 
Restoration Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF MULTIYEAR REDUCTION OF INDIRECT GRADUATE MEDICAL 
              EDUCATION PAYMENTS.

    Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(d)(5)(B)(ii)) is amended--
            (1) by adding ``and'' at the end of subclause (II); and
            (2) by striking subclauses (III), (IV), and (V) and 
        inserting the following:
                                    ``(III) on or after October 1, 
                                1998, `c' is equal to 1.6.''.
                                 <all>
```
confidential





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm



Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

New York, NY



We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s
Report on Assessment of 2018 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s
Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (item 1122(d)) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2018, excluding those criteria determined by management and noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s
Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor
or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s
Report. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible
for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s
assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.



We conducted our examination in accordance with the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the Company complied with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d). Our examination included tests
on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities
related to each asset backed transaction included in the Platform. Further an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance
arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above or subsequent to our tests that may have affected
the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactions
identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, for the Platform, is fairly
stated, in all material aspects.









New York, New York

February 20, 2019









confidential
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Child DevelopmentEarly Childhood EducationElementary School CurriculumExperiential LearningLearning ActivitiesLearning StrategiesPreschool CurriculumSmall Group InstructionStudent ProjectsTeaching MethodsYoung Children

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1023

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize indirect graduate

medical education payments.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 12, 1999

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

KERRY, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr.

LIEBERMAN, Mr. KERREY, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SPECTER, Mr.

CLELAND, and Mr. EDWARDS) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize

indirect graduate medical education payments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Graduate Medical Edu5 cation Payment Restoration Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 1023 IS

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF MULTIYEAR REDUCTION OF INDI2 RECT GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PAY3 MENTS.

4 Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act

5 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(ii)) is amended—

6 (1) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end of subclause

7 (II); and

8 (2) by striking subclauses (III), (IV), and (V)

9 and inserting the following:

10 ‘‘(III) on or after October 1,

11 1998, ‘c’ is equal to 1.6.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 3.4.1


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                           CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION
                                       OF
                                   PREFERENCES
                                       OF
                      SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                       OF
                             LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC.


         Lynx Therapeutics, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General  Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,  DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:

         FIRST:  The name of the  corporation  is Lynx  Therapeutics,  Inc. (the
"Corporation").

         SECOND:  The date on which  the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of the
Corporation first was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
is February 18, 1992.

         THIRD: The Board of Directors, acting in accordance with the provisions
of Section 151 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,  adopted
resolutions  to decrease the number of shares of Preferred  Stock  designated as
"Series B Convertible  Preferred  Stock" to the number of such shares  currently
outstanding,  by amending  Section A of Article THIRD and the first paragraph of
Section B of Article THIRD of the  "Certificate of Designation of Preferences of
Series B  Convertible  Preferred  Stock of Lynx  Therapeutics,  Inc." to read in
their entirety as follows:

                  "A. Three Hundred Thirty-Two Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-Eight
         (332,288)  of the  authorized  shares of  Preferred  Stock  hereby  are
         designated "Series B Convertible Preferred Stock."

                  B. The powers,  preferences,  rights,  restrictions  and other
         matters relating to the Three Hundred  Thirty-Two  Thousand Two Hundred
         Eighty-Eight  (332,288) shares of Series B Convertible  Preferred Stock
         are as follows:"



<PAGE>


                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  Lynx  Therapeutics,  Inc. has caused this
         Certificate  of Amendment to be signed by its Chief  Executive  Officer
         and attested by its Secretary this 23rd day of December, 1996.

                                                 LYNX THERAPEUTICS, INC.


                                                 /s/ Sam Eletr
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Sam Eletr, Ph.D.
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


ATTEST:


/s/ James C. Kitch
----------------------------
James C. Kitch
Secretary
                                       2.
§ 158.622 Administering salary in accordance with relevant provisions of other laws. ( a ) Except as stated in paragraph (b) of this section, the Department administers salary under this part in accordance with the provisions of 5 CFR part 550 regarding pay administration generally.
( b ) The following provisions of 5 CFR part 550 do not apply to administering salary under this part and do not apply under CTMS, to the DHS-CS, or to talent management involving the individuals described in § 158.103 of this part: ( 1 ) Subpart A regarding premium pay;
( 2 ) Subpart I regarding pay for duty involving physical hardship or hazard;
( 3 ) Subpart M regarding firefighter pay;
( 4 ) Subpart N compensatory time-off for travel; and
( 5 ) Subpart P regarding overtime for board patrol agents.
( c ) The Department also administers salary under this part in accordance with the provisions of the following: ( 1 ) 5 U.S.C. 5520, 42 U.S.C. 659 and 5 CFR parts 581 and 582, regarding garnishment;
( 2 ) 31 U.S.C. 3702 and 5 CFR part 178 regarding claims settlement;
( 3 ) 31 U.S.C. 3711 and 3716 and 31 CFR chapter IX parts 900 through 904 regarding debt collection;
( 4 ) 5 U.S.C. Chapter 55 Subchapter VII regarding payments to missing employees; and
( 5 ) Other relevant provisions of other laws specifically adopted in CTMS policy.
( d ) For purposes of salary administration under this section, the Department administers salary based on consideration of a DHS-CS employee's work schedule under the work scheduling system, described in § 158.705, and may convert the employee's salary into an hourly rate, biweekly rate, or other rate.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


     Each of the undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly  Report of Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-Q  for  the  period  ending  December  30,  2007,  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  FEBRUARY 8, 2008
        ----------------

                                           /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                           ---------------------
                                           Timothy T. Tevens
                                           Chief Executive Officer



                                           /S/ KAREN L. HOWARD
                                           ---------------------
                                           Karen L. Howard
                                           Chief Financial Officer
#### Radanovic *v.*Vermillion Coal Company.

[No. 12,435.

Filed October 30, 1925.]

Master and *Servant.—Workmen’s Compensation Act makes a parent’s dependency on son or daughter a question of fact for Industrial*Board.—Under §§37 and 38 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (§§9482, 9483 Burns 1926), the extent of a parent’s dependency on a son or daughter is a question of fact for the Industrial Board, and its decision must be accepted on appeal if there is any evidence to sustain it.

From Industrial Board of Indiana.

Claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Djuja. Radanovic against the Vermillion Coal Company. From an award for claimant on a finding that she was only partially dependent, she appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*Peter B. Nelson, Dumas V. McFall*and *Defrees, Buckingham & Eaton,*for appellant.

*Will H. Hays, Hinkle C. Hays, Alonzo .C. Owens, W. Paul Stratton, John S. Taylor, William H. Bridwell*and *George W. Buff,*for appellee.

Remy, C. J.

George Radanovic lost his life as the result of an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment by appellee. Appellant, the mother of Radanovic, claiming that, at the time of the death of her son, she was wholly dependent on him for support, made application for compensation. The In*556dustrial Board found that appellant was but partially dependent upon her son, and made an award accordingly. From the award, appellant prosecutes this appeal. The only question for determination is whether the award is sustained by sufficient evidence. Under §§37 and 38 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Acts 1919 p. 158, §§9482, 9483 Burns 1926, §§8020ul and 8020vl Burns’ Supp. 1921), the extent of a parent’s dependency upon a son or daughter, in a case like the one under consideration, is a question of fact for the Industrial Board. *Rasin*v. *Miami Coal Co.*(1922), 79 Ind. App. 123, 137 N. E. 529.

No good purpose would be served by a discussion of the evidence. It is sufficient to say that we have examined the testimony, and find that the award is sustained by sufficient evidence.

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF ERIC J. PULASKI, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND EDWARD L. PIERCE, DIRECTOR,
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned officers of BindView Development Corporation (the Company) hereby certify that
(a) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act); and (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and are subject to the knowledge and
willingness qualifications contained in 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(c). This certification is being furnished to the Commission and is not to be deemed filed with the
Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities
of Section 18. In addition, this certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any
registration statement of the Company or other filing of the Company made pursuant to the Exchange
Act or Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified as being incorporated
therein by reference. Dated: May 6, 2005
    
    /s/ Eric J. PulaskiEric J. PulaskiChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer/s/ Edward L. PierceEdward L. PierceDirector, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
### §2608. Title companies; liability of seller

(a) No seller of property that will be purchased with the assistance of a federally related mortgage loan shall require directly or indirectly, as a condition to selling the property, that title insurance covering the property be purchased by the buyer from any particular title company.

(b) Any seller who violates the provisions of subsection (a) shall be liable to the buyer in an amount equal to three times all charges made for such title insurance.

(Pub. L. 93–533, §9, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1728.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Dec. 22, 1974, see section 20 of Pub. L. 93–533, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Procedure for Removal of Nonconforming Hazardous Materials Packagings from Serv...                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Procedure for Removal of Nonconforming Hazardous Materials Packagings from Service PDF                   

# Procedure for Removal of Nonconforming Hazardous Materials Packagings from Service

**July 31, 2007**

Used by OHM as the basis for removing nonconforming packagings from service.

If you have any **technical questions** not addressed by this or associated documents, contact Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.

[NOTE: The attached documents are in PDF format, you can download a free viewer.  If you have problems accessing the PDFs or the information, report your problem for further assistance.]
# C_2006311EN.01006201.xml

| 19.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/62

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4433 — RREEF/Peel Ports Holdings/Peel Ports)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 311/18)

On 11 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4433. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4433. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
**EXHIBIT 15.4**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-229957 and No. 333-198578) and Form F-3 (No. 333-210795) of JD.com, Inc. of our report dated June 28, 2019 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Dada Nexus Limited, its subsidiaries, its variable interest entity (“VIE”) and VIE’s subsidiaries, appearing in Exhibit 99.2 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A (Amendment No. 1) of JD.com, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 
| /s/ Deloitte Touche   Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Shanghai, the People’s   Republic of China                 |
| June 28, 2019                                              |

 

----
### §1976. Injunctive relief for persons against threatened loss or damages; equitable proceedings; preliminary injunctions

Any person may sue for and have injunctive relief, in any court of the United States having jurisdiction over the parties, against threatened loss or damage by reason of a violation of section 1972 of this title, under the same conditions and principles as injunctive relief against threatened conduct that will cause loss or damage is granted by courts of equity and under the rules governing such proceedings. Upon the execution of proper bond against damages for an injunction improvidently granted and a showing that the danger of irreparable loss or damage is immediate, a preliminary injunction may issue.

(Pub. L. 91–607, title I, §106(f), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1767.)