alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00363

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF J.C., A C HILD §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 325th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 325

- 721871

- 22 )

F eb ruary 1, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s termination order . It is ordered that the trial court ’ s

termination order is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Br ian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
### SUBCHAPTER II—BUDGET-RELATED PROVISIONS
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 MEMORY PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  /s/ Vaughn M. Kailian

Vaughn M. Kailian
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Michael P. Smith

Michael P. Smith
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)November 13, 2008
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. and will be retained by Memory
Pharmaceuticals Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by reference into any
filing of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Docket Number: FAA-2014-0139

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 7/13/2012

Regional Airline Association 7/13/2012

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 7/13/2012

ATA Joe White 7/13/2012
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document











 



 
 

Exhibit 10.28    
    


GT Equipment Technologies, Inc.
  243 Daniel Webster Highway

Merrimack, NH 03054 


August 8,
2006 



	Mr. Ernest L. Godshalk	 	 
	675B Hale St.	 	Via e-mail and FedEx
	Beverly, MA 01915	 	 





Dear
Mr. Godshalk: 


        On
behalf of GT Equipment Technologies, Inc. ("GT Equipment"), I wish to convey our appreciation for your decision to join the Board of Directors of GT Equipment. We are very
excited about our growth opportunities, and are pleased that you have decided to help us reach those objectives. 


        According
to its bylaws, the business and affairs of GT Equipment shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board of Directors. Our bylaws also state that Directors shall be
elected annually and shall hold office until the next annual meeting. 



        The
Board of Directors will meet on a regular basis, approximately six times each year, in addition to the Annual Meeting. Special meetings may be called periodically by the President of
GT Equipment, Thomas Zarrella. 


        Your
compensation as a Director will be $30,000 per year, payable quarterly in advance. The company will also reimburse you for any travel or other incidental costs associated with your
tenure on the Board. Additionally, concurrent with your execution and delivery of this letter and the other documents described below, you will be granted an option to buy 11,520 shares of the common
stock of GT Equipment at an exercise price of $28.14 per share. 


        Enclosed
in this package are the following documents related to your stock option award: 



	1)
	The
Stock Option Agreement between you and the Company. Please sign this agreement to make the grant of your option effective, and return a signed copy to
Howard Smith.



	2)
	A
copy of the GT Equipment Stock Option Plan for your records.



	3)
	A
copy of the Employee Stockholders Agreement. As a condition to the exercise of your option, you will be required to become party to this agreement. 













        Please
note that your option is not exercisable at this time. Please read carefully the enclosed Stock Option Plan and Stock Option Agreement, which set forth the complete terms of your
stock option grant, including the vesting schedule (25% on each of the four anniversaries of the date hereof), conditions to exercise, limitations on transfer and more. 



        Please
also review, sign, and return to my attention the enclosed Confidentiality Agreement. 


        Please confirm your acceptance of this position by signing in the space provided below and faxing it to my attention at
(603) 598-0430. Again, thank you for your interest in and commitment to GT Equipment. 



	Sincerely,	 	 
	

/s/ Kedar P. Gupta
 Kedar Gupta

Chief Executive Officer	
 	

 





cc:
Richard Landers, GFI Energy Ventures, LLC 



	 	 	Accepted:
	

 	
 	

/s/ E Godshalk
 Ernest L. Godshalk
	

 	
 	

Date:	

15 Aug 06














QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.28
§ 83.12 What are the criteria for a previously federally acknowledged petitioner? ( a ) The petitioner may prove it was previously acknowledged as a federally recognized Indian tribe, or is a portion that evolved out of a previously federally recognized Indian tribe, by providing substantial evidence of unambiguous Federal acknowledgment, meaning that the United States Government recognized the petitioner as an Indian tribe eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians with which the United States carried on a relationship at some prior date including, but not limited to, evidence that the petitioner had: ( 1 ) Treaty relations with the United States;
( 2 ) Been denominated a tribe by act of Congress or Executive Order;
( 3 ) Been treated by the Federal Government as having collective rights in tribal lands or funds; or
( 4 ) Land held for it or its collective ancestors by the United States.
( b ) Once the petitioner establishes that it was previously acknowledged, it must demonstrate that it meets: ( 1 ) At present, the Community Criterion; and
( 2 ) Since the time of previous Federal acknowledgment or 1900, whichever is later, the Indian Entity Identification Criterion and Political Authority Criterion.
IV

House Calendar No. 321

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 652

[Report No. 106–1007]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2614) to amend the Small Business Investment Act to make

improvements to the certified development company program, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, OCTOBER 25), 2000

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2614) to amend the Small

Business Investment Act to make improvements to the

certified development company program, and for other

purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2614) to amend the Small Busi4 ness Investment Act to make improvements to the cer5 tified development company program, and for other pur-
2

HRES 652 RH

1 poses. All points of order against the conference report

2 and against its consideration are waived. The conference

3 report shall be considered as read.

Calendar No. 321

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 652

[Report No. 106–1007]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2614) to amend

the Small Business Investment Act to make improvements to the certified development companyprogram, and for other purposes.

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, OCTOBER 25), 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### The State *vs.*Charles S. Lattin.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of carnally knowing and abusing a female child under the age of ten years, (Rev. Stat., tit. 6, § 17,) upon the uncorroborated testimony, as to the principal fact, of the child herself, who was nine years of age. Held, on amotion of the defendant for a new trial for a verdict against evidence, that it was not necessary, to warrant the conviction, that the testimony of the child should have been confirmed by an examination of her person at the time, or by medical testimony.

Information, charging the defendant with *“*carnally knowing andoabusing a female! child under the age of ten years,” under the 17th section of Rev. Stat., tit. 6.

The defendant was convicted upon the testimony of the child, who was nine years of age. Her testimony was corroborated in some particulars of minor importance, but was uncorroborated as to the fact of the carnal knowledge by any other witness, or by any examination at the time of her person, or by medical testimony at the trial, and the defendant moved for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the evidence.

Graves with whom was *H. M. Dutton,*in support of the motion,

contended that, to authorize a conviction in such a case, it was indispensable that the testimony of the principal witness, as to the actual perpetration of the crime, where not corroborated by the testimony of others, should be confirmed by an examination of her person and by medical or other equivalent testimony; and that while this was held necessary by the authorities in ordinary cases of rape, it was much more necessary here, since the child would necessarily have a very imperfect comprehension of the matter: citing *King*v. *Cox,*5 Car. & P., 328; *King*v. *Gammon,*id., 339; 1 Russell on Crimes, 694, 5; Beck’s Med. Jur., 232, 237, 242.

*Sedgwick,*state attorney, and *Wheaton,*contra.

The court refused to grant a new trial.
#### § 75.4 Basic membership roll.

All persons whose names appear on the roll of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina, prepared and approved pursuant to the act of June 4, 1924 (43 Stat. 376), and the act of March 4, 1931 (46 Stat. 1518), shall be members of the Band.
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                     |
| Dated: February 26, 2019                                       |
|                                                                |
| /s/ Michael A. Hart                                                 |
| Michael A. HartChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.218 What is a claim under the CDA? ( a ) A claim is a written demand by one of the contracting parties, asking for one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Payment of a specific sum of money under the contract;
( 2 ) Adjustment or interpretation of contract terms; or
( 3 ) Any other claim relating to the contract.
( b ) However, an undisputed voucher, invoice, or other routing request for payment is not a claim under the CDA. A voucher, invoice, or routing request for payment may be converted into a CDA claim if: ( 1 ) It is disputed as to liability or amount; or
( 2 ) It is not acted upon in a reasonable time and written notice of the claim is given to the awarding official by the senior official designated in the contract.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 514 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 7, 2000.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4576) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of 
order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule 
XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 44.109 What happens if the grant recipient is overpaid? ( a ) If the Secretary has mistakenly overpaid the grant recipient, then the Secretary will notify the grant recipient of the overpayment. The grant recipient must return the overpayment within 30 days after the final determination that overpayment occurred.
( b ) When the grant recipient returns the money to the Secretary, the Secretary will distribute the money equally to all schools in the system.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-138 

April 8, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4063 Liability of Substantial Employer for Withdrawal 

OPINION: 

 This is in reference to your letter of * * *, requesting a determination by the PBGC as to the consequences under

Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) of a proposed sale by * * * of the assets of

its facility at * * * whose employees are covered by * * * (the "Plan"). You indicate that the purchaser will reemploy

the * * * employees and offer reemployment to the former employees of two facilities * * * previously closed by * * *

The purchaser will become a contributing employer under the Plan for all employees who are reemployed. * * * will

guarantee any contingent employer liability of the purchaser under Title IV in the event that the purchaser terminates

participation within the next 5 years. Under these circumstances, the plan administrator will determine that Section 13

of the Plan document is inapplicable to the previous closings and to the sale of the * * * facility. This provision limits

benefit payments to the participants of a closed facility to the assets attributable to contributions made on account of

participation at the facility. 

If * * * ceases to contribute to the Plan upon [*2] the closing of the * * * facility, and benefit payments to * * *

participants may be satisfied from the total sum of plan assets and are not limited to the assets attributable to

contributions made on account of participation at that facility, * * * will have withdrawn from the Plan pursuant to Sec.

4063 of the Act. This is so even if the purchaser of the assets of the * * * facility agrees to employ and make

contributions to the Plan for the former * * * employees at the three facilities covered by the Plan. Further, the liability

of * * * must be determined and satisfied in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 4063. However, we note that

subsection (e) of Sec. 4063 authorizes the PBGC to waive the normal liability requirements whenever it determines that

there is an indemnity agreement in effect among the remaining employers under the Plan which is adequate to satisfy the

purposes of Sec. 4063 and Sec. 4064 of the Act. * * * may wish to consider the possibility of obtaining such an

indemnity agreement. 

We hope this is of assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF GASLOG LTD.

The following companies are subsidiaries of GasLog Ltd.

|                                          |  |                              |  |                                
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                        |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | Proportion ofOwnership Interest
|Gaslog Investments Ltd.                   |  | BVI                          |  |                                
|GasLog Monaco S.A.M.                      |  | Monaco                       |  |                                
|GasLog LNG Services Ltd.                  |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GasLog LNG Employee Incentive Scheme Ltd. |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GasLog Carriers Ltd.                      |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-one Ltd.                              |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-two Ltd.                              |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-three Ltd.                            |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-four Ltd.                             |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-five Ltd.                             |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-six Ltd.                              |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-seven Ltd.                            |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-eight Ltd.                            |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-nine Ltd.                             |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-ten Ltd.                              |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-eleven Ltd.                           |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GAS-twelve Ltd.                           |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|GasLog Shipping Company Ltd.              |  | Bermuda                      |  |                                
|Gaslog Shipping Limited                   |  | BVI                          |  |                                



---