alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34.7
(logo) plante
       moran


Plante & Moran, PLLC
Suite 2700
225 W. Washington St.
Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.899.4460
Fax: 312.726.3262
plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that National Tax Search, LLC
(the "Company") complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the
National Tax Search TaxQ system (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012. The Company has determined that only certain servicing
criteria, 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),
1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are
applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform
covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable
to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this
report.

Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a
selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the
Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company
processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance
activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not
include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that
may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2012 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.


/s/Plante & Moran, PLLC


Chicago, IL
February 8, 2013


Praxity
MEMBER
GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF
INDEPENDENT FIRMS
IV

House Calendar No. 249

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 540

[Report No. 106–707]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 28, 2000

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on or before the legislative day of Friday, June 30,

6 2000, providing for consideration or disposition of a con7 ference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4425) making
2

HRES 540 RH

1 appropriations for military construction, family housing,

2 and base realignment and closure for the Department of

3 Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001,

4 and for other purposes, or any amendment reported in dis5 agreement from a conference thereon.

House Calendar No. 249

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 540

[Report No. 106–707]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

JUNE 28, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.167 If an Indian tribe or tribal organization objects to the recommended decision, what will the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the IBIA do? ( a ) The Secretary of Health and Human Services or the IBIA has 20 days from the date it receives any timely written objections to modify, adopt, or reverse the recommended decision. If the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the IBIA does not modify or reverse the recommended decision during that time, the recommended decision automatically becomes final.
( b ) When reviewing the recommended decision, the IBIA or the Secretary may consider and decide all issues properly raised by any party to the appeal, based on the record.
( c ) The decision of the Secretary or the IBIA shall: ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Specify the findings of fact or conclusions of law which are modified or reversed;
( 3 ) Give reasons for the decision, based on the record; and
( 4 ) State that the decision is final for the Department.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Availability of Seats for the Gray's Reef National Marine 
Sanctuary Advisory Council

AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean 
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 
Department of Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Notice and request for applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The ONMS is seeking applications for the following vacant seat 
on the Gray's Reef National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council: Georgia 
conservation. Applicants are chosen based upon their particular 
expertise and experience in relation to the seat for which they are 
applying; community and professional affiliations; philosophy regarding 
the protection and management of marine resources; and possibly the 
length of residence in the area affected by the sanctuary. Applicants 
who are chosen as members should expect to serve 3-year terms, pursuant 
to the council's Charter.

DATES: Applications are due by April 8, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Application kits may be obtained from Becky Shortland, 
Council Coordinator (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afcdcaccc4d681dcc7c0dddbc3cec1cbefc1c0cece81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c0e090f0715421f04031e18000d02082c02030d0d420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>, 10 Ocean Science Circle, 
Savannah, GA 31411; 912-598-2381) Completed applications should be sent 
to the same address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Shortland, Council Coordinator 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c1a3a4a2aab8efb2a9aeb3b5ada0afa581afaea0a0efa6aeb7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="177572747c6e39647f7865637b767973577978767639707861">[email protected]</span></a>, 10 Ocean Science Circle, Savannah, GA 31411; 
912-598-2381.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The sanctuary advisory council was 
established in August 1999 to provide advice and recommendations on 
management and protection of the sanctuary. The advisory council, 
through its members, also serves as liaison to the community regarding 
sanctuary issues and represents community interests, concerns, and 
management needs to the sanctuary and NOAA.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431, et seq.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary 
Program)

    Dated: February 23, 2011.
Daniel J. Basta,
Director, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, National Ocean 
Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-4706 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE v. HINTON

No. 488P89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 683

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1990.
§ 158.511 Outreach and sourcing. ( a ) The Department uses a variety of sources, including publicly available information, to identify individuals or groups of individuals for recruitment under this subpart.
( b ) CTMS policy implementing this subpart addresses: ( 1 ) Communication of opportunities for employment in the DHS-CS;
( 2 ) Communication of the application processes to individuals being recruited under this part or applying for employment under this part; and
( 3 ) Acceptance and treatment of applications for employment in the DHS-CS, including minimum application requirements established under this part.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of 1st Net  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2004,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James H. Watson,  Jr.,  Principal  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.





/s/ James H. Watson, Jr.
-----------------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Registrant

May 3, 2004
### Permit To Begin Business
# C_2007042EN.01004702.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 16 January 2007 — Borbély v Commission

(Case F-126/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Reimbursement of expenses - Installation allowance - Daily subsistence allowance - Travel expenses on taking up an appointment - Place of recruitment - Unlimited jurisdiction)

(2007/C 42/82)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Andrea Borbély (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Stötzel, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Kraemer, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the Commission refusing the applicant the benefit of the installation allowance and the daily subsistence allowance and reimbursement of travel expenses following the establishment of her place of recruitment as Brussels

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Declares that the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 2 March 2005 is annulled in so far as it refuses to grant the applicant the installation allowance provided for in Article 5(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations and the daily subsistence allowance provided for in Article 10(1) of that Annex; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 2 March 2005 is annulled in so far as it refuses to grant the applicant the installation allowance provided for in Article 5(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations and the daily subsistence allowance provided for in Article 10(1) of that Annex;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the applicant, in accordance with the rules of the Staff Regulations in force, those allowances plus default interest, from the dates on which they were payable respectively and up to the date of their payment, at the rate set by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing transactions, as applicable during the relevant period, increased by two points; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the applicant, in accordance with the rules of the Staff Regulations in force, those allowances plus default interest, from the dates on which they were payable respectively and up to the date of their payment, at the rate set by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing transactions, as applicable during the relevant period, increased by two points;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006, p. 54.

1

---
5.27 

1/15/03 

 Page 1 

Interpreting Laboratory Test Results 

A laboratory test is a medical procedure in which a sample of blood, urine, or other 

tissues or substances in the body is checked for certain features. Such tests are often used as part 

of a routine checkup to identify possible changes in a person’s health before any symptoms 

appear. Laboratory tests also play an important role in diagnosis when a person has symptoms. 

In addition, tests may be used to help plan a patient’s treatment, evaluate the response to 

treatment, or monitor the course of the disease over time. 

 Laboratory test samples are analyzed to determine whether the results fall within normal 

ranges. They also may be checked for changes from previous tests. Normal test values are 

usually given as a range, rather than as a specific number, because normal values vary from 

person to person. What is normal for one person may not be normal for another person. Many 

factors (including the patient’s sex, age, race, medical history, and general health) can affect test 

results. Sometimes, test results are affected by specific foods, drugs the patient is taking, and 

how closely the patient follows pre-test instructions. That is why a patient may be asked not to 

eat or drink for several hours before a test. It is also common for normal ranges to vary 

somewhat from laboratory to laboratory. 

 Some laboratory tests are precise, reliable indicators of specific health problems. Others 

provide more general information that simply gives doctors clues to possible health problems. 

Information obtained from laboratory tests may help doctors decide whether other tests or
5.27 

1/15/03 

 Page 2 

procedures are needed to make a diagnosis. The information may also help the doctor develop or 

revise a patient’s treatment plan. All laboratory test results must be interpreted in the context of 

the overall health of the patient and are generally used along with other exams or tests. The 

doctor who is familiar with the patient’s medical history and current condition is in the best 

position to explain test results and their implications. Patients are encouraged to discuss 

questions or concerns about laboratory test results with the doctor. 

 

# # # 

Sources of National Cancer Institute Information

Cancer Information Service

 Toll-free: 1–800–4–CANCER (1–800–422–6237) 

 TTY (for deaf and hard of hearing callers): 1–800–332–8615 

NCI Online 

Internet

Use http://cancer.gov to reach the NCI’s Web site. 

LiveHelp 

Cancer Information Specialists offer online assistance through the LiveHelp link on the 

NCI’s Web site. 

 

This fact sheet was reviewed on 1/15/03
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Kelly, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 855]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered December 16, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the first degree and assault in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [2]) and assault in the third degree (§ 120.00 [1]). We reject defendant’s contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction. With respect to the physical injury element of both crimes of which defendant was convicted, the evidence is legally sufficient to establish that the victim suffered the requisite “impairment of physical condition or substantial pain” (§ 10.00 [9]; *see People v Amin,*294 AD2d 863 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 672 [2002]; *Matter of Isaac M.,*219 AD2d 805 [1995]; *People v Beaton,*152 AD2d 992 [1989], *lv denied*74 NY2d 845 [1989]). Also contrary to defendant’s *1342contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The jury was entitled to credit the testimony of the victim that she was attacked by defendant in her apartment and to reject the theory of the defense that defendant was attacked in the hallway of an apartment building by the victim and another man *(see generally People v Shaw,*277 AD2d 1052 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 806 [2001]).

Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the comments of the prosecutor during his opening and closing statements were “fair comment on the evidence and ‘did not exceed the broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in [such statements]’ ” *(People v Williams,*28 AD3d 1059, 1061 [2006], quoting *People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396, 399 [1981]). In any event, the prosecutor’s alleged misconduct was not “so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial” *(id.*at 1060; *see People v Melendez,*11 AD3d 983, 984 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 888 [2005]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Hurlbutt, A.P.J., Gorski, Smith and Centra, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.88 What should the Indian tribe or tribal organization do if it wants to obtain title to government-furnished real property that includes land not already held in trust? If the land is owned by the United States but not held in trust for an Indian tribe or individual Indian, the Indian tribe or tribal organization shall specify whether it wants to acquire fee title to the land or whether it wants the land to be held in trust for the benefit of a tribe. ( a ) If the Indian tribe or tribal organization requests fee title, the Secretary shall take the necessary action under Federal law and regulations to transfer fee title.
( b ) If the Indian tribe or tribal organization requests beneficial ownership with fee title to be held by the United States in trust for an Indian tribe: ( 1 ) The Indian tribe or tribal organization shall submit with its request a resolution of support from the governing body of the Indian tribe in which the beneficial ownership is to be registered.
( 2 ) If the request is submitted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for land under the jurisdiction of that Secretary, the Secretary shall take all necessary steps to effect a transfer of the land to the Secretary of the Interior and shall also forward the Indian tribe or tribal organization's request and the tribe's resolution.
( 3 ) The Secretary of the Interior shall expeditiously process all requests in accordance with applicable Federal law and regulations.
( 4 ) The Secretary shall not require the Indian tribe or tribal organization to furnish any information in support of a request other than that required by law or regulation.
# C_2006331EN.01002404.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Allemagne) — F. Weissheimer Malzfabrik v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-151/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 331/45)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1078 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                Private Calendar No. 24
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1078

                          [Report No. 106-961]

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2000

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            October 11, 2000

       Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 For the relief of Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, 
                    and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Mrs. Elizabeth 
Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Mrs. Elizabeth Eka 
Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey, as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by the appropriate number during the current fiscal 
year the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the 
country of the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

            Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.
                                                Private Calendar No. 24

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1078

                          [Report No. 106-961]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 For the relief of Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, 
                    and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 11, 2000

       Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

EconomicsElementary Secondary EducationNational StandardsSocial Studies

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget