alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 700.138 Persons who have not applied for voluntary relocation by July 7, 1986. ( a ) Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 640d-14 (d)(3) heads-of-household who do not make timely arrangements for relocation by filing an application by July 7, 1986, shall be provided a replacement home by the Commission. To be eligible for benefits (Housing and Moving Expenses), such persons must be, as of July 7, 1986, physically residing full time on land partitioned to a tribe of which they are not members and they must also otherwise meet all other current eligibility criteria.
( b ) The Commission shall utilize amounts payable with respect to such households pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 640d-14(b)(2) and 25 U.S.C. 640d-34(a) for the construction or acquisition of a home and related facilities for such households.
( c ) Persons identified by the Commission as potentially subject to relocation who have not applied for relocation assistance shall be contacted by the Commission as soon as practicable after July 7, 1986. At such time, the Commission shall— ( 1 ) Request that the head-of-household choose an available area for relocation, and contract with the Commission for relocation; and
( 2 ) Offer the relocatee suitable housing; and
( 3 ) Offer to purchase from the head-of-household the habitation and improvements; and
( 4 ) Offer provisions for the head-of-household and his family to be moved (e.g., moving expenses, etc.).
( d ) If a person so identified fails to agree to move after the actions outlined in this section are taken by the Commission and suitable housing is available (or sufficient funds are available to assure the relocation assistance to which the relocatee may be entitled), the Commission will issue a ninety-day notice stating the date by which the person will be required to vacate the area partitioned to the Tribe of which he is not a member.
[51 FR 19170, May 28, 1986]
### §1748e. Mortgages on property in Alaska

The second sentence of section 1715d of this title, as amended, relating to housing in the State of Alaska, shall not apply to mortgages insured under this subchapter on property in said State.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title VIII, §806, as added Aug. 8, 1949, ch. 403, §1, 63 Stat. 576; amended Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title IV, §401, 69 Stat. 651; Pub. L. 86–70, §10(d), June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 143.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1715d of this title, referred to in text, was in the original "section 214 of the National Housing Act, as amended". Section 214 of that Act was classified originally to section 1715d of this title and to section 484d of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions. Section 484d of Title 48 has been omitted from the Code.

#### Amendments

1959—Pub. L. 86–70 substituted "State" for "Territory" in two places.

1955—Act Aug. 11, 1955, reenacted section without change.
-  Home 
-  Safety Awareness 
-  Excavator Final Rule 

# In This Section

                      -  Safety Awareness Overview 
                      -  Pipeline Leak Recognition and What to Do 
                      -  Excavation Enforcement Final Rule                          -  Overview 
                        -  Rule Language 
                        -  Determinations of Adequacy 
                        -  Frequently Asked Questions 
                      -  Pipeline Emergency Responders Initiative (PERI)                          -  Overview 
                        -  PERI FAQs 
                        -  Eastern Region 
                        -  Southern Region 
                        -  Central Region 
                        -  Southwest Region 
                        -  Western Region 
                      -  Safety Awareness Reports Search 
                      -  Historical Pipeline Incidents 
                      -  Pipeline Failure Investigation Reports 
                      -  Marine Damage Prevention 

## Contact Us

Pipeline Excavation Enforcement
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**Excavation.Enforcement@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Determinations of Adequacy
-  Home 

# Specialized Bulk Explosives Truck Inspection Action Plan

Specialized Bulk Explosive Trucks Action Plan.pdf (20.51 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
-  Home 
-  Legislative Mandates 

# In This Section

                      -  PIPES Act of 2020 
                      -  PIPES Act of 2016 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Safety Improvement Act of 2012 
                      -  Pipeline Safety Act of 2011 
                      -  The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act 
                      -  Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) / Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Related Reports and Studies                   
                  -                                          Other PHMSA Resources                   

## Contact Us

Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4831****Fax:**202-366-7431**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011

In its commitment to transparency, PHMSA publicly tracks its progress on implementing the Pipeline Safety Act's mandates and required action.

## About the Act

The Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 was designed to examine and improve the state of pipeline safety regulation. The Act:
                      - Reauthorizes PHMSA's federal pipeline safety programs through fiscal year 2015
                      - Provides the regulatory certainty necessary for pipeline owners and operators to plan infrastructure investments and create jobs
                      - Improves pipeline transportation by strengthening enforcement of current laws and improving existing laws where necessary
                      - Ensures a balanced regulatory approach to improving safety that applies cost-benefit principles
                      - Protects and preserves Congressional authority by ensuring certain key rulemakings are not finalized until Congress has an opportunity to act
                      - Access the full text of the Act  **here** .
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# AGENCY:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Availability of FY 2010 Service Contract Inventories.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY 2010 Service Contract inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2010. The information is organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at                         *http://www.whitehouse.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​omb/​procurement/​memo/​service-ontract-nventories-guidance-11052010.pdf.*                         The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory on the EEOC homepage at the following link: Doing Business with EEOC.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions regarding the service contract inventory should be directed to Doreen Starkes in the Acquisition Services Division at (202) 663-4240 or                         *DOREEN.STARKES@EEOC.GOV.*

Dated: February 23, 2011.

Doreen Starkes,

Contracting Officer, Acquisition Services Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011-4554 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
### Dissolution and Appointment of Receivers
#### § 700.11 Manner of notice.

Each notice which the Commission is required to provide under these regulations shall be personally served, receipt documented, or sent by certified or registered first-class mail, return receipt requested. Each notice shall be written in plain understandable language. Recipients who notify the Commission that they are unable to read and understand the notice will be provided with appropriate translation and counseling. Each notice shall indicate the name and telephone number of a person who may be contacted for answers to questions or other needed help.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-29 

October 22, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4062 Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans

4062(e) Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans. Closing of Facility Affecting More Than 20% of Plan

Participants

4064 Liability of Employers in Multiple Employer & Multiemployer Plans 

OPINION: 

 This responds to your request for a written opinion from this office concerning the effect of Sections 4064, 4062

and 4062(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA") as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan

Amendments Act of 1980, 29 U.S.C. § § 1364, 1362, 1362(e) (1976) and Supp. IV 1980) on a transaction involving

an employer's sale of substantially all of its assets, and the concurrent transfer of its defined benefit pension plans, to an

unrelated buyer. 

1. Sections 4064 and 4062 

PBGC will not, as a general rule, seek from the seller employer liability under Section 4064 or 4062, with respect

to a termination of a pension plan by a successor employer after the sale of substantially all of the seller's assets, if: 

(1) as of the closing date of the sale, a plan had sufficient assets to satisfy all benefits which are guaranteed by the

PBGC under Title IV, or 

(2) a plan's assets are not sufficient to provide [*2] guaranteed benefits on the closing date, 30% of the statutory

net worth of the employer maintaining the plan immediately after the closing is greater than the sum of the plan asset

insufficiencies of all the single-employer plans maintained by such employer. 

2. Section 4062(e) 

The application of Section 4062(e) is conditioned upon an employer's cessation of operations at a fecility and a

resulting separation from employment of more than 20% of all plan participants. Section 4062(e) would not apply to

the seller as a result of the transaction you have described. 

I trust that this response will be of help to you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
EX-35.1


(logo) Prudential

Prudential Asset Resources

Prudential Mortgage Capital Company
2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201
Tel 214 777-4500

A business of Prudential Financial, Inc.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Attn: Commercial Mtg Servicing
MAC D1086-120
550 South Tryon Street, 14th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202


RE:  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through, RBS 2012-C7
     Period: January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period")

Annual Compliance Statement

I, Keith Kehlbeck, in my capacity as Vice President, Accounting and Operations
of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard
to the Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of June 1, 2012 pertaining to the
above-referenced certificates, that:

(i)  a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the
     Reporting Period, and of the performance of the Company under the
     Agreement has been made under my supervision, and

(ii)  to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has
      fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material
      respects throughout the Reporting Period.


Effective as of March 25, 2014


/s/ Keith Kehlbeck
Keith Kehlbeck
Vice President, Accounting and Operations
Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-35 

October 26, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022(a) Benefits Guaranteed. Type of Benefits Guaranteed 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request for a determination whether the early retirement factors in the * * * Pension Plans

(the "Plans") should be used in calculating guaranteed benefits rather than the factors used in annuity policies issued by

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. According to the facts presented, the Plans which terminated on September 1,

1980 provided normal retirement benefits for all participants by purchasing paid-up annuity policies from the

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. You contend that early retirement benefits are properly determined in accordance

with the terms of those policies. However, the early retirement factors provided by Metropolitan Life produce a

significantly smaller benefit than factors used under the Plans. 

Under the law in effect at the time the Plans terminated, PBGC guaranteed benefits that were nonforfeitable "under

the terms of a plan" (ERISA § 4022(a), emphasis added). Nothing in the statute allowed PBGC to base its guarantees

on anything but the terms of the Plans. Absent a reduction in benefit levels pursuant to a plan amendment prior to

termination, the PBGC would [*2] measure insured benefits using the Plans' factors at the date of termination. 

Further, it is important to note that the Plan is a contract between * * * (the "Corporation") and its employees. See,

Allied Structural Steel Company v. Spannaus, 439 U.S. 886 (1978). As such, the rights of both parties became fixed and

actions altering these rights were precluded as of the date of plan termination. See, Audio Fidelity Corporation v. Pension

Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 624 F.2d 513, 517 (4th Cir. 1980). The purchase of annuities from an insurance company,

thus, cannot change the benefit amount to which a participant is entitled on the date of plan termination. 

This letter constitutes an initial determination of the PBGC of the amount of guaranteed benefits under the Plans.

This determination is subject to administrative appeal under PBGC's regulation on Rules for Administrative Review of

Agency Decisions, a copy of which is enclosed. However, in accordance with Subpart B of that regulation, PBGC is

making this determination effective on the date of this letter and there is no obligation to exhaust administrative remedies

by filing an appeal. 

We hope this [*3] answer proves of assistance to you. If you have any questions concerning the foregoing, please

contact * * * of this office at (202) 254-4895. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### John L. Marsh *v.*The Fairbury, Pontiac and Northwestern Railway Company *et al.*

Specific *pebfobmaece—of a contract on the part of a railroad company to locate depots at pa/rticular points—whether will he enforced.*Equity will not enforce tbe specific performance of a contract on the part of a railway company to locate passenger’ and freight depots at a particular point and at no other point in a town, the enforcement of such contract being regarded as against public policy.

Writ op Error to the Circuit Court of Livingston *county;*the Hon. Charles H. Wood, Judge, presiding.

*415Mr. A. E. Harding, and Mr. J. B. Young, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. L. E. Payson, and Messrs. Pillsbury & Lawrence, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Sheldón

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a bill in chancery, filed to enforce the specific performance of a contract made by the Fairbury, Pontiac and Northwestern Railway Company “to locate passenger and freight depots of said road in Marsh’s addition to Fairbury, and at no other point in said town.” '

The court below sustained a demurrer to the bill, and dismissed it.

This is not a case which concerns merely the private interests of two suitors. It is a matter where the public interest is involved. Railroad companies are incorporated by authority of law not for the promotion of mere private ends, but in view of the public good they subserve. It is the circumstance of public use which justifies the exercise on their behalf of the right of eminent domain in the taking of private property for the purpose of their construction. They have come to be almost a public necessity, the general welfare being largely dependent upon these modes of inter-communication, and the manner of carrying on their operations.

The specific execution of a contract in equity is a matter not of absolute right in the party, but of sound discretion in the court; and in deciding whether specific performance should be enforced against a railway company, the court must have regard to the interests of the public. *Raphael*v. *Railway Co.*2 Law Rep. 2 Eq. Cases, 37. The location of railroad depots has much to do with the accommodation of the wants of the public.

And when once established, a change of affairs may require a change of location, in order to suit public convenience.

*416We can not admit that an individual is entitled to call for the interference of a court of equity to compel a railroad, company to locate unchangeably its depot at a particular spot to subserve the private advantage of such individual.

Railroad companies, in order to fulfill one of the ends of their creation—the promotion of the public welfare—should be left free to establish and re-establish their depots wheresoever the accommodation of the wants of the public may require.

To grant the relief asked for by the complainant, we would regard as against public policy; and he must be left, for whatever remedy he may have, to his suit at law for damages.

- The court below properly sustained the demurrer, and dismissed the bill.

The decree of the court below is affirmed.

*Decree affirmed.*
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****MEMORY PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Each of the undersigned officers of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. (the “Company”) herebycertifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2006 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   /s/ James R. Sulat   JAMES R. SULAT  President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)  May 15, 2006     /s/ Joseph M. Donabauer   JOSEPH M. DONABAUER  Vice President & Controller  (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)  May 15, 2006   *   Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. and will be retained by MemoryPharmaceuticals Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### CAPITAL FORD, INC. v. GODWIN ASSOCIATES

No. 65P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 142

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1990.
### §1322. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–230, §24, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 466

Section, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title II, §217, 42 Stat. 1473, related to amendment or repeal of chapter.
-  Home 

# 2022 Safety of Gas Transmission Final Rule FAQs

**Year: 2022**

2022-Safety-of-Gas-Transmission-Final-Rule-Faqs.pdf (147.46 KB)

**Year:** 2022

**Description:**

2022 Safety of Gas Transmission Final Rule FAQs (PDF)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
§ 115.141 Assessment for risk of victimization and abusiveness. ( a ) Before placing any detainees together in a holding facility, agency staff shall consider whether, based on the information before them, a detainee may be at a high risk of being sexually abused and, when appropriate, shall take necessary steps to mitigate any such danger to the detainee.
( b ) All detainees who may be held overnight with other detainees shall be assessed to determine their risk of being sexually abused by other detainees or sexually abusive toward other detainees; staff shall ask each such detainee about his or her own concerns about his or her physical safety.
( c ) The agency shall also consider, to the extent that the information is available, the following criteria to assess detainees for risk of sexual victimization: ( 1 ) Whether the detainee has a mental, physical, or developmental disability;
( 2 ) The age of the detainee;
( 3 ) The physical build and appearance of the detainee;
( 4 ) Whether the detainee has previously been incarcerated or detained;
( 5 ) The nature of the detainee's criminal history; and
( 6 ) Whether the detainee has any convictions for sex offenses against an adult or child;
( 7 ) Whether the detainee has self-identified as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, intersex, or gender nonconforming;
( 8 ) Whether the detainee has self-identified as having previously experienced sexual victimization; and
( 9 ) The detainee's own concerns about his or her physical safety.
( d ) If detainees are identified pursuant to the assessment under this section to be at high risk of victimization, staff shall provide such detainees with heightened protection, to include continuous direct sight and sound supervision, single-cell housing, or placement in a cell actively monitored on video by a staff member sufficiently proximate to intervene, unless no such option is determined to be feasible.
( e ) The facility shall implement appropriate controls on the dissemination of sensitive information provided by detainees under this section.