# + 2

(,1 1/,1(

Citation: 47 Fed. Reg. 26620 1982

Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu Jul 26 12:45:54 2012

-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

### Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 119 / Monday, June 21, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

adverse comments were received, EPA approves the satisfaction ofthe TSP Control Strategy.

Ozone Control Strategy

The ozone control strategy approval condition discussed in today's notice

concerns the State's commitment to conduct a study to demonstrate that the 3 pound per hour, 15 pound per day exemption for solvent metal cleaners contained in Rule 205(k) represent RACT, to submit the results of the study to EPA, to submit any necessary regulations to the IPCB, and promulgate and submit any necessary regulations to EPA.

EPA Study (EPA 905/4-80-008) Volatile OrganicCompoundEmission from Solvent CleaningOperations in the StateofIllinoiswas prepared to satisfy the report requirement. The study reached two conclusions: (1)The Illinois rule, as applied in Illinois, is more stringent than the EPA "presumptive norm" contained in the Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG), and (2) the allowable emissions from the Illinois rule are within five percent ofthose resulting from a rule consistent with the CTG.

The Office ofManagement and Budget has exempted this rule from the requirements ofsection 3 ofExecutive Order 12291.

Under 5 U.S.C. 605(b](1) ofthe Act, petitions forjudicial review ofthis action must be filed in the United States Court ofAppeals for the appropriate circuit by August 20, 1982. This action may not be challenged laterin proceedings to enforce its requirements.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part52

Air pollution control, Ozone, Sulfur oxides, Nitrogen dioxide, Lead, Particulate matter.

This Notice ofFinal Rulemaking is issued under the authority ofsections 110, 172 of the Clean Air Act,as amended.

Note.-Incorporation by reference ofthe State Implementation Plan forthe State of Illinois was approved by the Director ofthe Federal Register onJuly 1,1981.

Dated: June 14,1982. Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator.

PART 52-APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Title40 ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations Chapter I,Part 52 is amended as follows: 

### Subpart 0 Illinois

Section 52.720(c) is amended by adding paragraphs (33) and (34) to read

as follows: §52.720 Identification ofthe plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * * (33) On October 1,1981, the State submitted a report in satisfaction ofthe Total Suspended Particulate Control Strategy approval condition in which the State agreed to conduct an analysis of the potential air quality impact from storage piles with uncontrolled emissions of less than 50 tons per year, to submit the results ofany analysis to EPA, to submit any necessary regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board, and promulgate and submit any necessary regulations to EPA. Thisreport concluded that no further regulations were needed.

(34) EPA Study Volatile Organic Compound Emissions fromSolvent CleaningOperations in theStateof Illinois(EPA 905/4-80-008) was prepared to satisfy the Ozone Control Strategy approval conditionin which the State agreed to conduct a study to demonstrate that the three pound per hour, 15 pound per day exemption for solvent metal cleaners contained inRule 205(k) represents RACT, to submit the results ofthe study to EPA, to submit any necessary regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board and promulgate and submit any necessary regulations to EPA.

The State reviewed this report and in

a February 11, 1981, letter toEPA noted their agreement with the findings ofthe report and indicated that because there

was no need for further regulations, this condition is satisfied.

* *b * * *

Section 52.725 Control Strategy: Particulates is amended by removing and reserving (a) as follows:
§52.725 ControlStrategy: Particulates.

(a) [Removed and Reserved]

Section 52.726 Control Strategy: Ozone is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows: §52.726 ControlStrategy: Ozone.

(a) Part D-Conditional ApprovalTheIllinois plan is approved provided that the following conditions are satisfied:

(1)[Removed and Reserved]

[FRDoc. 82-16710 Filed 0-18-82: 8:45 ami
BILUNG CODE 6560-50-M 40 CFR Part 52
[A-9-FRL-2127-4]
Nevada; Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final Rulemaking.
SUMMARY: On February 18, 1982, EPA proposed action on revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Nevada. The revisions were submitted to meet the requirements ofParts C and D ofthe Clean Air Act for preconstruction review ofnew and modified major stationary sources of those air pollutants regulated under the Act.Today's notice takes final action under the Clean Air Act to approve these revisions. EFFECTIVE DATE: 

### This action is effective June 21, 1982. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David P.Howekamp, Acting Director, Air Management Division,Region 9, Environmental Protection Agency, 215 Fremont Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, Attention: Donald Harvey (415) 974-8213. ADDRESS: A copy oftoday's revision to the Nevada SIPis located at: The Office ofthe Federal Register, 1100

LStreetNW., Room 8401, Washington, D.C. 20408. Public Information Reference Unit,

Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20460. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background

Tke Clark County Health District (CCHD) adopted regulations for New Source Review and Prevention of Significant Deterioration. These regulations contain thepreconstruction review requirements for new and modified major stationary sources. On November 17, 1981. the State ofNevada submitted these regulations as revisions to its SIP.On February 18, 1982 (47 FR 7267) EPAproposed to approve these revisions.

EPA Actions

EPA is taking final action under section 110 and Parts C and D ofthe Clean Air Act to approve the CCHD rules submitted on November 17,1981. No comments were received during the public comment period.

EPA has a responsibility to take final action as soon as possible in order to minimize any delays in the processing of permits. Therefore, EPAfinds thatgood 

### 26620

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26620 1982

### Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 119 / Monday, June 21, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

cause exists for making this action immediately effective. Regulatory Process

The Office ofManagement andBudget has exempted this rule fromthe requirements ofsection 3ofExecutive Order 12291. Under the Clean Air Act, any petitions forjudicial review ofthis action must be filed in the United States Court ofAppeals for the appropriate circuit by August 20, 1982. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.

Note.-lncorporation by reference of the State Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada was approved by the Director ofthe Federal Register onJuly 1,1981.
Listof Subjects in40 CFR Part 52

Airpollution control, Ozone, Sulfur oxides, Nitrogen dioxide, Lead, Particulate matter, Carbon monoxide, Hydrocarbons. (Sections 110, 129, 160 to169, 171 to 173and 301(a) ofthe Clean Air Act asamended (42 USC 7410, 7429, 7470 to 7479, 7501 to 7503, and 7601(a))

Dated: June 14, 1982. Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrotor.

PART 52-APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Subpart DD ofChapter I,Title 40, Code ofFederal Regulations is amended

as follows: Subpart DD-Nevada

1. Section 52.1470, paragraph (c) is amended by adding subparagraph (24)(iii) to read as follows: §52.1470 Identification of plan.



### (c)* * * (24) * * * (iii) Amendments to the Clark County District Board ofHealthAir Pollution Control Regulations:

Section 1-Definitions 1.7, 1.13, 1.14, 1.15, 1.32, 1.48, 1.50, 1.52, 1.57, 1.67, 1.72, 1.90 and the addition ofthe following unnumbered definitions: "Emission Unit," "Criteria Pollutant," "Non-Criteria Pollutant," "Baseline Area," "Begin Actual Construction," "Building, Structure, Facility,

orInstallation," "Particulate Precursor," "Secondary Emissions," and "Significant."

Section 15--Source Registration, 15.1, 15.1.1, 15.1.2, 15.1.3, 15.1.4, 15.1.5, 15.1.6, 15.1.7, -15.1.8, 15.2; 15.2.1, 15.2.2, 15.3, 15.4,15.5; Preconstruction Review for New and Modified Sources, 15.6, 15.6.1, 15.6.1.1, 15.6.1.2 (deleted), 15.6.1.6, 15.6.2, 15.6.2.1 (deleted), 15.6.2.2, 15.6.2.3, 15.6.2.4, 15.6.2.5, 15.6.3, 15.6.3.1, 15.6.3.2 to 15.6.3.5 (added), 15.6.6, 15.7, 15.8, 15.9, 15.10, 15.10.1, 15.10.2, 15.10.3, 15.10.4, 15.11, 15.12; Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration, 15.13 (added); Preconstruction Review Requirements for New orModified Sources in Areas Exceeding Air Quality Standards ("Offset" Rules), 15.14.1, 15.14.1.2, 15.14.1.3 (added), 15.14.3.1, 15.14.3.2, 15.14.4, 15.14.4.1, 15.14.4.3, 15.14.3.3 (added), 15.14.4.3.4 (added), 15.14.4.3.5 (added) and, 15.14.4.4 (deleted).

2. Section 52.1485 is revised to read as follows:
§52.1485 Significantdeterioration of air quality.

(a) Therequirements ofsections 160 through 165 ofthe Clean Air Act are not met, since the plan, except as itapplies to the Clark County Health District, does not include approvable procedures for preventing the significant deterioration of air quality.

(b) Regulation forpreventing significant deterioration ofairquality. The provisions of §52.21(b) through (w)

are incorporated and made a part ofthe applicable State plan for the State of Nevada except for that portion applicable to the Clark County Health District.

IFR Doc. 82-16713 Filed 6-18-82; 8:45 am)
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M

40 CFR Part 52
[A-4-2136-8]

Tennessee: Approval of Implementation Plan Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is today announcing approval ofseveral State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State ofTennessee. These revisions involve changes and additions to the regulatory and the non- regulatory parts ofthe following Tennessee rules: general definitions, visible emissions, process emission standards, construction and operating permits, required sampling, recording and reporting, methods ofsampling and anaysis, new source performance standards, volatile organic compounds, and limits on emissions due to malfunctions, startups and shutdowns. EFFECTIVE DATE: This action will be effective on August 20, 1982, unless notice is received within 30"days that

someone wishes to submit adverse or critical comments. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Mr. DrewPeake ofEPA, Region IV's Air Programs Branch (see address below). Copies ofthe materials 

### submitted by Tennessee maybe examined during normal business hours 

### at the following locations:
Public Information Reference Unit,



### Library Systems Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20460 Library Office ofthe Federal Register,

1100 LStreetNW., Room 8401, Washington, D.C. 20005 Environmental Protection Agency,

Region IV, AirPrograms Branch, 345 Courtland Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365 Division ofAir Pollution Control,

Tennessee Department ofPublic 

### Health, 150 9th Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee 37203.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.Drew Peake, Air Programs Branch, 

### EPA Region IV, at the above listed address and phone 404/881-2864 orFTS 

### 257-2864.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: 

### The purpose of thisnotice is to announce actionon a series ofrevisions and additions to the Tennessee implementation plan dealing with various requirements of the Clean Air Act. EPA today approves the following revisions to the Rules ofthe Tennessee Department ofPublic Health as they

were adopted by the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board.

1200-3-2-.01-(vvv) through (cccc) add the following definitions: Primary aluminum reductionplant, potroom, potroom group, roofmonitor, total fluorides, center worked prebaked, side worked prebaked, and soda recovery boiler,respectively. (Submitted January 22, 1982)

1200-3-5-.01-(1) concerning general standards was revised to allow foran alternate test method for fuel burning installations with fuel burning equipment of input capacity greater than 

### 600X1O6

### BTU perhour. (Submitted December 9,1981)

1200-3-5-.09 added visible emission 

### standards forkraft mill recovery furnaces. (Submitted January 22, 1982)

1200-3-7-.12 addedprocess emission standards forcarbon monoxide emissions from catalytic cracking units 

### at petroleum refineries in Shelby County. 

### (Submitted January 22, 1982)



### 1200-3-9-.01-(5)-(b)-6.-(i) changed the definition ofa major source ofsulfur dioxide and volatile organic compounds to a source with potential emissions of

more than 100 tonsper year and allowable emissions (basedon best available control technology) greater than any ofthe following: 40tons per year, 1000pounds per day, or100 26621

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26621 1982