[Cite as State v. Bowshier, 2023-Ohio-959.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

CLARK COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO

 Appellee

v.

JUSTIN W. BOWSHIER

 Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

C.A. No. 2022-CA-41

Trial Court Case No. 21CR0331

(Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas 

Court)

. . . . . . . . . . .

O P I N I O N

Rendered on March 24, 2023

. . . . . . . . . . . 

IAN A. RICHARDSON, Attorney for Appellee

 

JOE CLOUD, Attorney for Appellant

 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

HUFFMAN, J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Justin W. Bowshier appeals from his conviction in the 

Clark County Common Pleas Court after entering a guilty plea to one count of aggravated 

possession of drugs in violation of R.C 2925.11(A), a felony of the fifth degree. In 

exchange for his guilty plea, the State agreed to recommend community control, and on 

June 7, 2022, the trial court sentenced Bowshier to two years of community control, 
-2-

including 180 days of local jail time, with credit for 14 days and the balance of the 

sentence to be suspended upon Bowshier’s transport to West Central Community 

Correctional Facility. On June 15, 2022, Bowshier simultaneously filed his motion for 

reconsideration and notice of appeal. 

{¶ 2} Bowshier’s appointed appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that he found no 

non-frivolous issues for appeal and requesting leave to withdraw, but he provided one 

potential issue for our review: the lack of a final decision and/or final order by the trial 

court regarding Bowshier’s motion for reconsideration. Bowshier also filed a pro se brief, 

challenging his sentence by suggesting that he had considered withdrawing his guilty plea 

because he did not expect jail time to be part of his community control sentence. In his 

brief, Bowshier also described his efforts to transfer to West Central Community 

Correctional Facility and the later disposition related to his parole violation in the same 

matter. Bowshier had not filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. For the following 

reasons, we hereby affirm the judgment of the trial court. 

I. Anders Standard

{¶ 3} When an Anders brief is filed, the appellate court must determine, “after a full 

examination of all the proceedings,” whether the appeal is “wholly frivolous.” Anders at 

744; Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). “An issue is 

not frivolous merely because the prosecution can be expected to present a strong 

argument in reply.” State v. White, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 28338, 2020-Ohio-5544, 

¶ 14, citing State v. Pullen, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 19232, 2002-Ohio-6788, ¶ 4. Rather, 
-3-

a frivolous appeal is one that presents issues lacking arguable merit, which means that, 

“on the facts and law involved, no responsible contention can be made that it offers a 

basis for reversal.” State v. Marbury, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 19226, 2003-Ohio-3242, 

¶ 8, citing Pullen at ¶ 4. If we find that any issue – whether presented by appellate counsel, 

presented by the defendant (if a pro se brief is filed), or found through an independent 

analysis – is not wholly frivolous, we must appoint different appellate counsel to represent 

the defendant. Id. at ¶ 7.

II. Factual Background and Analysis 

{¶ 4} In the present case, the Anders brief identifies the following issue that 

Bowshier’s appellate counsel raised: the lack of a final decision and/or final order by the 

trial court regarding Bowshier’s motion for reconsideration. Counsel asserted that the lack 

of a final decision or final order by the trial court “potentially creates an issue of there 

being no Final Judgment Entry for Appellate Review in the trial court case.” Appellate 

counsel also sees no non-frivolous arguments regarding this issue. We agree with 

counsel’s assessment.

{¶ 5} The Supreme Court of Ohio determined that a judgment of conviction is 

a final appealable order when the order sets forth the manner of conviction and the 

sentence. State v. Baker, 119 Ohio St.3d 197, 2008-Ohio-3330, 893 N.E.2d 163, ¶ 18.

Because Bowshier’s motion for reconsideration was filed after the judgment of conviction, 

which included the manner of conviction and the sentence, the trial court’s lack of a final 

decision or final order regarding Bowshier’s motion for reconsideration was of no 
-4-

consequence.

{¶ 6} Moreover, an “appeal is perfected upon the filing of a written notice of 

appeal.” State v. Burns, 2d. Dist. Montgomery 27374, 2018-Ohio-1419, ¶ 11, 

quoting Jackson Tube Serv., Inc. v. Camaco, L.L.C., 2d Dist. Miami Nos. 2012-CA-19 & 

2012-CA-25, 2013-Ohio-2344, ¶ 43, citing R.C. 2505.04. Once a case has been 

appealed, the “ ‘trial court retains jurisdiction [only] over issues not inconsistent with the 

appellate court’s jurisdiction to reverse, modify, or affirm the judgment [on] appeal[ ].’ ” Id.

By filing his notice of appeal on the same day as his motion for reconsideration, Bowshier 

divested the trial court of jurisdiction to reconsider its June 7, 2022, judgment entry of 

conviction. Thus, counsel’s proposed assignment of error is frivolous.

{¶ 7} Next, in his brief, it appears that Bowshier’s only assignment of error is 

whether his guilty plea was entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily, as he asserts

that he did not expect jail time to be a part of his community control sentence, and, thus, 

spoke to his attorney about withdrawing his guilty plea. However, no motion to withdraw 

guilty plea was ever submitted. 

{¶ 8} The parties entered into a plea agreement, and the following exchange 

occurred at the plea hearing on May 18, 2022:

[THE COURT]: Before the Court is Case 21-CR-0331, State of Ohio versus 

Justin Wayne Bowshier. The defendant is charged with aggravated 

possession of drugs, a felony of the fifth degree.

The Court has been presented with a plea of guilty to that offense. 

Document indicates that the parties understand that a presentence 
-5-

investigation will be conducted prior to disposition, and at the disposition the 

State is agreeing to recommend community control. 

Are those all the terms as understood by the State?

[PROSECUTOR]: They are, Your Honor.

[THE COURT]: Are those all the terms as understood by the Defense?

[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: They are.

* * *

[THE COURT]: As to the single charge in the indictment, aggravated 

possession of drugs, a felony of the fifth degree, how does the defendant 

wish to proceed?

[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Thank you, Your Honor.

Pursuant to the agreement, the terms of which [sic] been placed on 

record, Justin would change his originally entered plea of not guilty to one 

of guilty to the sole count of the indictment, aggravated possession of drugs, 

a fifth-degree felony, with the understanding that a presentence 

investigation would be completed prior to disposition and that the State of 

Ohio would recommend a sentence of community control. 

[THE COURT]: You are Justin Wayne Bowshier?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

* * *

[THE COURT]: Are you under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or medication 

today?
-6-

[DEFENDANT]: No, sir.

[THE COURT]: Are you on probation, parole, community control, or postrelease control?

[DEFENDANT]: No, sir.

[THE COURT]: Have you discussed your case and possible defenses with 

your attorney?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

[THE COURT]: Are you satisfied with the advice and representation your 

attorney’s given you?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

* * *

[THE COURT]: Is this your signature on the last page of the plea form?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir. 

[THE COURT]: Before you signed the document, did you read it and go over 

it with your attorney?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

[THE COURT]: Did you understand everything in the document?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

[THE COURT]: The possible maximum penalty for this offense is 12 months 

in prison, a $2500 fine, driver’s license suspension of six months to five 

years, and court costs.

Do you understand that?
-7-

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

[THE COURT]: If you go to prison, upon your release after serving the time 

given you by the Court, the Parole Authority will have the option of placing 

you on post-release control. 

Do you understand that?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir. 

* * *

[THE COURT]: Has anyone made any promise to you other than what’s 

been placed on record to get you to enter this plea?

[DEFENDANT]: No, sir.

[THE COURT]: Has anyone made any threat to you?

[DEFENDANT]: No, sir.

[THE COURT]: Do you understand the Court is not required to follow 

recommendations of disposition?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

[THE COURT]: Has anybody given you any suggestion to anticipate any 

particular disposition?

[DEFENDANT]: No, sir.

[THE COURT]: By pleading guilty, you admit the truth of the facts the 

prosecutor put on record; you admit that you committed the offense of 

aggravated possession of drugs, a felony of the fifth degree; and you waive 

your right to a trial by jury.
-8-

Do you understand that?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

[THE COURT]: At a trial you could not be found guilty unless the State 

proved beyond a reasonable doubt to every member of the jury each and 

every element of the offense.

Do you understand that?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

[THE COURT]: Those elements would be that on or about January the 10th, 

2021, in Clark County, Ohio, you did knowingly obtain, possess, or use the 

Schedule II controlled substance methamphetamine or a compound, 

mixture, preparation, or substance containing the Schedule II controlled 

substance methamphetamine. 

Do you understand these elements, sir?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir. 

[THE COURT]: At the trial you would have the right to be confronted by 

every witness brought against you and the right to cross-examine those 

witnesses.

Do you understand these rights?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

[THE COURT]: You would have the right to have witnesses testify in your 

behalf. You would have the subpoena power of the Court to compel your 

witnesses to appear.
-9-

Do you understand these rights?

[THE COURT]: You would have the right to testify, but you could not be 

compelled to do so. If you decided not to testify, the fact that you did not 

testify could not be used against you.

Do you understand that?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

* * *

[THE COURT]: Mr. Murphy, are you satisfied that your client understands 

the nature and elements of the offense to which he’s pleading guilty and 

that would have to be proven if he were to go to trial?

[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes, Your Honor.

[THE COURT]: Mr. Bowshier, at this time are you telling the Court that you 

want to waive all the rights we’ve gone over, give them up for the purposes 

of this case, and plead guilty to the charge of aggravated possession of 

drugs, a felony of the fifth degree?

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, sir.

[THE COURT]: Find the defendant’s knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently 

waived his rights and entered a plea a guilty to the charge of aggravated 

possession of drugs, a felony of the fifth degree. Based upon his plea, I find 

him guilty of that offense.

* * *

{¶ 9} At the disposition hearing on June 7, 2022, the trial court sentenced Bowshier 
-10-

to two years of community control and 180 days in jail, with 14 days of credit and the 

balance to be suspended upon Bowshier’s transport to West Central Community 

Correctional Facility. At the hearing, the following exchange took place:

[THE COURT]: * * *

Going back to the factors under 2929.12(D), the defendant has a 

history of criminal convictions and has not always responded favorably to 

sanctions previously imposed. I find no genuine remorse for the offense. I 

find no factors indicating recidivism is less likely. There’s no military service 

record to consider. The defendant scored high on the Ohio Risk 

Assessment Survey.

This is a felony of the fifth degree, a nonviolent offense, but 

mandatory community control is not applicable because of the defendant’s 

prior felony convictions. The record indicates a prior violation of conditions 

of his bond in this case. The defendant previously served a prison term; and 

as I’ve indicated further, this offense occurred while the defendant was on 

bond or under release on another case in Chillicothe. So all of these factors 

would indicate you’re not much into following rules, even the simplest law 

of the State of Ohio, which is don’t drive without a license and insurance. 

That should be the easiest one to follow.

[DEFENDANT]: Yes, Your Honor.

[THE COURT]: But you keep breaking that and you have offenses of 

violence and you have offenses of violence pending in municipal court. The 
-11-

municipal court’s sitting over there wondering what are they gonna do with

the felony? Are we gonna actually handle these cases or are we gonna let 

them roll to the side?

This is a nonviolent felony of the fifth degree with the defendant 

scoring high on the ORAS.

Today I’m putting the defendant on community control for a period of 

two years. We’ll start with intensive supervision.

You will comply with all the rules of the probation department. These 

rules will include the following sanctions: 180 days in jail. The balance of 

the jail time can be suspended. He has credit for 14 days on that sanction, 

and then the balance of that can be suspended when he is transported to 

the program at the West Central Community Correctional Facility where he 

will have to complete that program as a sanction of community control as 

well as any recommended follow-up programs.* * *

{¶ 10} The potential penalty for a fifth-degree felony conviction is six to 12 months 

in prison. R.C. 2929.14. R.C. 2929.16 allows the trial court to impose a jail term as part 

of a community control sanction: 

(A) Except as provided in this division, the court imposing a sentence for a 

felony upon an offender who is not required to serve a mandatory prison 

term may impose any community residential sanction or combination of 

community residential sanctions under this section. * * * Community 

residential sanctions include, but are not limited to, the following: * * *
-12-

(2) Except as otherwise provided in division (A)(3) or (6) of this 

section and subject to division (D) of this section, a term of up to six months 

in a jail; * * *

{¶ 11} Crim.R. 11(C)(2) requires the court to address the defendant personally 

and: (a) determine that the defendant is making the plea voluntarily, with an 

understanding of the nature of the charges and the maximum penalty, and, if applicable, 

that the defendant is not eligible for probation or for the imposition of community control 

sanctions; (b) inform the defendant of and determine that the defendant understands the 

effect of the plea and that the court, upon acceptance of the plea, may proceed with 

judgment and sentencing; and (c) inform the defendant and determine that he or she 

understands that, by entering the plea, the defendant is waiving the rights to a jury trial, 

to confront witnesses against him or her, to have compulsory process for obtaining 

witnesses, and to require the State to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial at 

which he or she cannot be compelled to testify against himself or herself. State v. 

Brown, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 21896, 2007-Ohio-6675, ¶ 3. As indicated above, all of 

this was done by the trial court.

{¶ 12} The trial court considered the presentence investigation, the record, oral 

statements of counsel, the defendant's statement, and the principles and purposes of 

sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and then balanced the seriousness and recidivism factors 

under R.C. 2929.12. Bowshier was advised by the trial court that the court did not have 

to impose the agreement as written and that the possible maximum penalty for the offense 

was 12 months in prison, a $2,500 fine, driver’s license suspension of six months to five 
-13-

years, and court costs; Bowshier acknowledged his understanding of the same. 

Bowshier’s potential sentence included up to 12 months in jail but, based on the plea 

agreement, the trial court sentenced Bowshier to two years of community control, 

including 180 days of local jail time, which was within the trial court’s discretion because 

a local jail sentence is a potential term of community control. 

{¶ 13} Having performed our duty under Anders to independently review the 

record, we have found nothing to suggest Bowshier’s guilty plea was anything less than 

knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. The record reflects a thorough Crim.R. 

11 plea colloquy; that Bowshier was represented by counsel; that Bowshier was satisfied 

with his attorney’s representation of him; that Bowshier indicated that he understood the 

proceedings and the terms of the plea agreement; that Bowshier was personally 

addressed at the plea hearing; that Bowshier was advised of all the potential 

consequences of his guilty plea; and that Bowshier’s sentence was within the applicable 

statutory range and was not contrary to law. 

{¶ 14} Upon review of the entire record, including the plea and sentencing hearing 

transcripts, the docketed filings, and the presentence investigation, we are unable to find 

any meritorious appellate issues and find this appeal to be wholly frivolous. Any potential 

issues with Bowshier’s community control compliance and probation violation hearing as 

set forth in his pro se brief are outside the scope of this appeal. 

III. Conclusion

{¶ 15} We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

. . . . . . . . . . . . .
-14-

EPLEY, J. and LEWIS, J., concur.