alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 115.71 Criminal and administrative investigations. ( a ) If the facility has responsibility for investigating allegations of sexual abuse, all investigations into alleged sexual abuse must be prompt, thorough, objective, and conducted by specially trained, qualified investigators.
( b ) Upon conclusion of a criminal investigation where the allegation was substantiated, an administrative investigation shall be conducted. Upon conclusion of a criminal investigation where the allegation was unsubstantiated, the facility shall review any available completed criminal investigation reports to determine whether an administrative investigation is necessary or appropriate. Administrative investigations shall be conducted after consultation with the appropriate investigative office within DHS, and the assigned criminal investigative entity.
( c ) ( 1 ) The facility shall develop written procedures for administrative investigations, including provisions requiring: ( i ) Preservation of direct and circumstantial evidence, including any available physical and DNA evidence and any available electronic monitoring data;
( ii ) Interviewing alleged victims, suspected perpetrators, and witnesses;
( iii ) Reviewing prior complaints and reports of sexual abuse involving the suspected perpetrator;
( iv ) Assessment of the credibility of an alleged victim, suspect, or witness, without regard to the individual's status as detainee, staff, or employee, and without requiring any detainee who alleges sexual abuse to submit to a polygraph;
( v ) An effort to determine whether actions or failures to act at the facility contributed to the abuse; and
( vi ) Documentation of each investigation by written report, which shall include a description of the physical and testimonial evidence, the reasoning behind credibility assessments, and investigative facts and findings; and
( vii ) Retention of such reports for as long as the alleged abuser is detained or employed by the agency or facility, plus five years.
( 2 ) Such procedures shall govern the coordination and sequencing of the two types of investigations, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, to ensure that the criminal investigation is not compromised by an internal administrative investigation.
( d ) The agency shall review and approve the facility policy and procedures for coordination and conduct of internal administrative investigations with the assigned criminal investigative entity to ensure non-interference with criminal investigations.
( e ) The departure of the alleged abuser or victim from the employment or control of the facility or agency shall not provide a basis for terminating an investigation.
( f ) When outside agencies investigate sexual abuse, the facility shall cooperate with outside investigators and shall endeavor to remain informed about the progress of the investigation.
§ 584.3 How do I appeal a notice of violation, proposed civil fine assessment, order of temporary closure, the Chair's decision to void or modify a management contract, the Commission's proposal to remove a certificate of self-regulation, the Chair's decision to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission's minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards, and a notice of late fees and late fee assessments? ( a ) Within 30 days after the Chair serves his or her action or decision, or the Commission serves its intent to remove a certificate of self-regulation, the appellant must file a notice of appeal with the Commission. The notice of appeal must reference the action or decision from which the appeal is taken.
( b ) Within 10 days after filing the notice of appeal, the appellant shall file with the Commission: ( 1 ) A list of the names of proposed witnesses who will present oral testimony at the hearing, the general nature of their expected testimony, and whether a closed hearing is requested and the reason(s) therefor; and
( 2 ) A brief that states succinctly the relief sought and the ground(s) in support thereof, which may include supporting documentation and evidence in the form of affidavits.
( c ) A party that has filed a notice of appeal may waive the right to an oral hearing before a presiding official and instead elect to have the matter determined by the Commission solely on the basis of written submissions. Appeals based on written submissions are governed by part 585 of this subchapter. If there is more than one party that has filed a notice of appeal, and any party that has filed a notice of appeal elects a hearing before a presiding official, the entire matter will proceed before a presiding official.
( d ) The Chair may file a response brief and a list of the names of proposed witnesses who will present oral testimony at the hearing, the general nature of their expected testimony, and whether a closed hearing is requested and the reason(s) therefor, within 10 days after service of the appellate brief.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Thirteenth Meeting: Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-
79: Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79: 
Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79: Enhanced 
Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

DATES: The meeting will be held March 29-31, from 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036. Point of Contact is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#63290a150611100c0d23111700024d0c1104"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2f8dbc4d7c0c1dddcf2c0c6d1d39cddc0d5">[email protected]</span></a>, 
telephone (202) 833-9339, Fax (202) 833-9434.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79: 
Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS) 
meeting.
    The agenda will include:

Tuesday, March 29

<bullet> 8 a.m.-5 p.m. Plenary discussion.
    <bullet> Introductions and administrative items.
    <bullet> Review and approve minutes from last full plenary meeting.
    <bullet> Review Advanced Vision Systems performance objectives.
    <bullet> Review DO-315B FRAC Draft.

Wednesday, March 30

<bullet> 8 a.m.-5 p.m. Plenary Discussion 1 (SVS) and Working Group 2 
(EFVS) discussion.

Thursday, March 31

<bullet> 8 a.m.-3 p.m. Plenary discussion.
    <bullet> Advanced Vision Systems Discussion.
    <bullet> Administrative items (meeting schedule).
    <bullet> Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, February 25, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-4766 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Almeda Morrell, Respondent, v. The Village of Sandy Hill, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. All concurred, except Chester and Kellogg, JJ., dissenting.
### Loans by Federal Land Banks Through Agents
#### § 126.3 Definitions.

*Classified information* has the meaning given to that term in Executive Order 13526 or any successor Executive Order.

*Communication technology* means telephone or a videoconferencing platform.

*Other protected information* means other information that the government is authorized by statute, regulation, or Executive order to withhold.

*Sensitive Security Information (SSI)* means information described in 49 CFR 1520.5.

*Substantial evidence* means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.

*Transportation Security Oversight Board (TSOB)* means the board established pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 115.

*Transportation Security Oversight Board (TSOB) Review Panel* means the panel established pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 46111(d) to consider an appeal from a decision of an administrative law judge as the result of a hearing under 49 U.S.C. 46111(b).
#### SCREAMING EAGLE AIR, LTD. v. AIRPORT COMM. OF FORSYTH COUNTY

No. 61P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 30

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
# C_2006294EN.01004702.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/47

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 October 2006 — Nijs v Court of Auditors

(Case T-171/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Promotion - Promotion year 2003 - Staff report - Award of merit points - Decision not to promote the applicant to the post of translator-reviser)

(2006/C 294/99)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Auditors (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier and G. Corstens, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the decision definitively establishing his staff report for the year 2003, of the decision awarding the applicant's merit points for the year 2003 and of the decision not to promote him in 2004, and also of the decision rejecting his complaint against those decisions and, second, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Court of Auditors' decisions awarding the applicant his merit points for the year 2003 and not to promote him in 2004. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Court of Auditors' decisions awarding the applicant his merit points for the year 2003 and not to promote him in 2004.

| 2. | Rejects the remainder of the action. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Rejects the remainder of the action.

| 3. | Orders the Court of Auditors to bear its own costs and half those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Court of Auditors to bear its own costs and half those incurred by the applicant.

| 4. | Orders the applicant to bear all the costs relating to the proceedings for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the applicant to bear all the costs relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 182 of 23.7.2005.

1

---
### §1957. Additional criminal penalty in certain cases

Whoever willfully violates, or willfully causes a violation of any regulation under this chapter, section 1829b of this title, or section 1730d 1 of this title, where the violation is committed in furtherance of the commission of any violation of Federal law punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Pub. L. 91–508, title I, §127, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1118; Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, §1535(c)(2), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4067.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1730d of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 101–73, title IV, §407, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 363.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–550 inserted ", or willfully causes a violation of" after "Whoever willfully violates".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of seventh calendar month which begins after Oct. 26, 1970, except that the Secretary of the Treasury may, by regulation, provide that this section be effective on any date not earlier than the publication of such regulations in the Federal Register and not later than first day of thirteenth calendar month which begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 401(a), (b) of Pub. L. 91–508, set out as a note under section 1951 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
### [§2213. Renumbered §3070]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2213 was renumbered section 2350c of this title.
H. Res. 648

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 25, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (S. 835) to encourage the restoration of estuary habitat through more efficient project financing and enhanced coordination of Federal and non-Federal restoration programs,

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The

conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 42.6 When does due process require a formal disciplinary hearing?

Unless local school policies and procedures provide for less, a formal disciplinary hearing is required before a suspension in excess of 10 days or expulsion.
# C_2006331EN.01001302.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/13

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands)) — Compaq Computer International Corporation v Inspecteur der Belastingdienst — Douanedistrict Arnhem

(Case C-306/04) (1)

1

(Customs value - Laptop computers equipped with operating systems software)

(2006/C 331/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Compaq Computer International Corporation

Applicant:

Defendant: Inspecteur der Belastingdienst — Douanedistrict Arnhem

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Gerechtshof te Amsterdam — Interpretation of Article 32(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) — Customs value of goods — Portable computers incorporating operating software at the time of their importation

Operative part of the judgment

In order to determine the customs value of imports of computers equipped by the seller with software for one or more operating systems made available by the buyer to the seller free of charge, in accordance with Article 32(1)(b) or (c) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, the value of the software must be added to the transaction value of the computers if the value of the software has not been included in the price actually paid or payable for those computers.

The same is true when the national authorities accept as the transaction value, in accordance with Community law, the price of a sale other than that made by the Community purchaser. In such cases, ‘buyer’ for the purposes of Article 32(1)(b) or (c) of the Customs Code must be understood to mean the buyer who concluded that other sale.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 11.9.2004.

1

---
§ 115.87 Data collection. ( a ) Each facility shall maintain in a secure area all case records associated with claims of sexual abuse, including incident reports, investigative reports, offender information, case disposition, medical and counseling evaluation findings, and recommendations for post-release treatment, if necessary, and/or counseling in accordance with these standards and applicable agency policies, and in accordance with established schedules. The DHS Office of Inspector General shall maintain the official investigative file related to claims of sexual abuse investigated by the DHS Office of Inspector General.
( b ) On an ongoing basis, the PSA Coordinator shall work with relevant facility PSA Compliance Managers and DHS entities to share data regarding effective agency response methods to sexual abuse.
( c ) On a regular basis, the PSA Coordinator shall prepare a report for ICE leadership compiling information received about all incidents or allegations of sexual abuse of detainees in immigration detention during the period covered by the report, as well as ongoing investigations and other pending cases.
( d ) On an annual basis, the PSA Coordinator shall aggregate, in a manner that will facilitate the agency's ability to detect possible patterns and help prevent future incidents, the incident-based sexual abuse data, including the number of reported sexual abuse allegations determined to be substantiated, unsubstantiated, or unfounded, or for which investigation is ongoing, and for each incident found to be substantiated, information concerning: ( 1 ) The date, time, location, and nature of the incident;
( 2 ) The demographic background of the victim and perpetrator (including citizenship, age, gender, and whether either has self-identified as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, intersex, or gender nonconforming);
( 3 ) The reporting timeline for the incident (including the name of individual who reported the incident, and the date and time the report was received);
( 4 ) Any injuries sustained by the victim;
( 5 ) Post-report follow up responses and action taken by the facility (e.g., housing placement/custody classification, medical examination, mental health counseling, etc.); and
( 6 ) Any sanctions imposed on the perpetrator.
( e ) Upon request, the agency shall provide all data described in this section from the previous calendar year to the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties no later than June 30.
### §906. Art. 106. Impersonation of officer, noncommissioned or petty officer, or agent or official

(a) In General.—Any person subject to this chapter who, wrongfully and willfully, impersonates—

(1) an officer, a noncommissioned officer, or a petty officer;

(2) an agent of superior authority of one of the armed forces; or

(3) an official of a government;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Impersonation With Intent to Defraud.—Any person subject to this chapter who, wrongfully, willfully, and with intent to defraud, impersonates any person referred to in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(c) Impersonation of Government Official Without Intent to Defraud.—Any person subject to this chapter who, wrongfully, willfully, and without intent to defraud, impersonates an official of a government by committing an act that exercises or asserts the authority of the office that the person claims to have shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, title LX, §5417, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2945.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 906 was renumbered section 903 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-18-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-09-1999
<CASH>                                          24,101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,278
<INVENTORY>                                    758,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               928,482
<PP&E>                                         565,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,372,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          550,534
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                     203,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,372,821
<SALES>                                        522,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               522,239
<CGS>                                          318,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  318,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,753
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,530
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 11.10 Interest, penalty charges, and administrative costs. ( a ) *Assessment and notice.* DHS shall assess interest, penalties and administrative costs on DHS debts in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 31 CFR 901.9. Administrative costs of processing and handling a delinquent debt shall be determined by DHS.
( b ) *Waiver of interest, penalties, and administrative costs.* DHS may waive interest, penalties, and administrative costs, or any portion thereof, under the criteria in the FCCS, or when it determines the collection of these charges would be against equity and good conscience or not in the best interests of the United States. The authority to waive interest, penalties and administrative costs is delegated to the Chief Financial Officer. The DHS Chief Financial Officer shall issue written guidance on maintaining records of waivers.
( c ) *Accrual during suspension of debt collection.* Interest and related charges will not accrue during the period a hearing official does not render a timely decision.
#### Home National Bank *v.*Wolf.

[No. 12,255.

Filed October 8, 1925.]

From Boone Circuit Court; *Frank E. Hutchinson,*Judge.

Action between the Home National Bank and Ellis Wolf. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*Ira M. Sharp,*for appellant.

*Dodson & Scifres,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.