alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 520

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2457) to prohibit health insurance and employment discrimination against individuals and their family

members on the basis of predictive genetic information or genetic services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 2000

Ms. SLAUGHTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2457) to prohibit health insurance and employment discrimination

against individuals and their family members on the

basis of predictive genetic information or genetic services.

1 Resolved, That, immediately upon the adoption of this

2 resolution, the Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 2457) to prohibit health insurance

6 and employment discrimination against individuals and

7 their family members on the basis of predictive genetic in8 formation or genetic services. General debate shall be con-
2

•HRES 520 IH

1 fined to the bill and shall not exceed 30 minutes equally

2 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi3 nority member of the Committee on Education and the

4 Workforce, 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by

5 the chairman and ranking minority member of the Com6 mittee on Ways and Means, and 30 minutes equally di7 vided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minor8 ity member of the Committee on Commerce. After general

9 debate, the bill shall be considered for amendment under

10 the five-minute rule. Each title shall be considered as read.

11 During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chair12 man of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

13 in recognition on the basis of whether the member offering

14 an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion

15 of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose

16 in clause 8 in rule XVIII.

17 SEC. 2. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

18 for amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the

19 bill to the House with such amendments as may have been

20 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or21 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

22 without intervening motion, except one motion to recom23 mit with or without instructions.

24 SEC. 3. If the Committee of the Whole rises and re25 ports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, then
3

•HRES 520 IH

1 on the next legislative day the House shall, immediately

2 after the third daily order of business under clause 1 of

3 rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for fur4 ther consideration of the bill.

Æ
### Part C—Approval of Disclosure Information and Issuance of Charters by the Farm Credit Administration Board
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: GARY EUGENE SIMS,

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00137-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Gary Eugene Sims, a Texas inmate, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

against the 282nd District Court of Dallas County, Texas asking that we order the judge of that 

court to rule on three motions. We dismiss the mandamus petition for lack of jurisdiction.

A court of appeals has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against certain judges 

within its geographic district. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b)(West 2004). A court of 

appeals also has authority to issue a writ of mandamus if it is necessary to enforce its 

jurisdiction. Id. § 22.221(a). Thus, we may issue a writ of mandamus against a judge outside of 

our district only if it is necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of this Court. Relator does not have 

any pending appeals before this Court and he has failed to show that the 282nd District Court has

otherwise interfered with our appellate jurisdiction. Consequently, we dismiss the mandamus 

petition for lack of jurisdiction.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

May 14, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
# C_2006326EN.01003502.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/35

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 27 October 2006 — Erika Hollmann v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-443/06)

(2006/C 326/75)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Erika Hollmann

Applicant:

Defendant: Fazenda Pública

Defendant:

Intervener: Ministério Público

Intervener:

Question referred

Does Article 43(2) of the Personal Income Tax Code (CIRS), approved by Decree-law No. 442-A/88 of 30 November 1988, as amended by Law No. 109-B/2001 of 27 December 2001, which limits the incidence of the tax to 50 % of capital gains realised by persons residing in Portugal, infringe Articles 12, 18, 39, 43 and 56 of the Treaty establishing the European Community by excluding from that limitation capital gains realised by a person residing in another Member State of the European Union?

---
#### DOROTHY D. DYSON v. GARY B. STONESTREET and DEOMALEE F. STONESTREET

No. 35A90

(Filed 13 June 1990)

APPEAL of right by defendant Gary B. Stonestreet pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (1989) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 96 N.C. App. 564, 386 S.E.2d 595 (1989), reversing an order of directed verdict for said defendant entered by *Barefoot, J.,*on 14 February 1989 in Superior Court, New HANOVER County. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 May 1990.

*Thomas J. Morgan for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Murchison, Taylor, Kendrick, Gibson & Davenport, by Vaiden P. Kendrick and John L. Coble, for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Becton, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is

Reversed.
# C_2006281EN.01003401.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/34

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — DEF-TEC Defense Technology v OHIM — Defense Technology (FIRST DEFENSE AEROSOL PEPPER PROJECTOR)

(Case T-6/05) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative mark FIRST DEFENSE AEROSOL PEPPER PROJECTOR - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Existence of trade mark proprietor's consent)

(2006/C 281/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DEF-TEC Defense Technology GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Daniel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Defense Technology Corporation of America (Jacksonville, Florida) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 November 2004 (Case R 493/2002-2), relating to opposition proceedings between DEF-TEC Defense Technology GmbH and Defense Technology Corporation of America

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 8 November 2004 (Case R 493/2002 2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 8 November 2004 (Case R 493/2002 2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and the costs of the applicant, except those relating to the intervention; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and the costs of the applicant, except those relating to the intervention;

| 3. | Orders the applicant to bear the costs relating to the intervention; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the applicant to bear the costs relating to the intervention;

| 4. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

1

---
----

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |
| 001-10315                | 63-0860407 |
| (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|                     |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| (d)    |   | Exhibits. |
|   |   |
| 99.1   |   | Conference call transcript, dated November 24, 2014, relating to the signing of an agreement to acquire Encompass Home Health and Hospice. |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   |   |   |
| By:    | /S/   DOUGLAS E. COLTHARP |
|   | Name: | Douglas E. Coltharp |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know all persons by these presents, that I, the
undersigned, a director of The ADT Corporation., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation), do hereby make, nominate and appoint Kathryn A. Mikells, Michele Kirse, and N. David Bleisch, and each of them, to be my attorney-in-fact, with
full power and authority to sign on my behalf a Form 10-K for the year ended September 28, 2012, to be filed by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, which shall have the same force and
effect as though I had manually signed the Form 10-K or any amendments thereto.



|                                      |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|Name                                  |  |  |  | Capacity             
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Thomas Colligan Thomas Colligan   |  |  |  | Director             
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Timothy Donahue Timothy Donahue   |  |  |  | Director             
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Robert Dutkowsky Robert Dutkowsky |  |  |  | Director             
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Bruce Gordon Bruce Gordon         |  |  |  | Chairman and Director
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Bridgette Heller Bridgette Heller |  |  |  | Director             
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Kathleen Hyle Kathleen Hyle       |  |  |  | Director             
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Dinesh Paliwal Dinesh Paliwal     |  |  |  | Director
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 30410 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

HEATH MESHELL , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:16

- CR

- 97

- 1

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and H O, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Heath Meshell has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Meshell h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 20 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-30410 Document: 00514353855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2018No. 17

- 30410

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANT ED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-30410 Document: 00514353855 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 96 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 96

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
thirds vote on any bill or joint resolution that either authorizes the 
President to enter into a trade agreement that is implemented pursuant 
to fast-track procedures or that implements a trade agreement pursuant 
                          to such procedures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1999

Mr. Traficant submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
thirds vote on any bill or joint resolution that either authorizes the 
President to enter into a trade agreement that is implemented pursuant 
to fast-track procedures or that implements a trade agreement pursuant 
                          to such procedures.

    Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``6. No bill or joint resolution that--
            ``(1) authorizes the President to enter into a trade 
        agreement that is implemented by a bill or joint resolution 
        that is considered by each House of Congress under procedures 
        that preclude amendments; or
            ``(2) implements any trade agreement and that is not 
        subject to amendment;
shall be considered as passed or agreed to unless so determined by a 
vote of not less than two-thirds of the Members voting.''.
                                 <all>
```
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Leadership 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Office of the Chief Counsel                   

## Contact Us

Office of Chief Counsel
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsachiefcounsel@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4400****Fax:**202-366-7041****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Acting Chief Counsel

## Vasiliki Tsaganos

Vasiliki Tsaganos is the Deputy Chief Counsel of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and a member of the Executive Team of PHMSA.  Ms. Tsaganos is PHMSA’s senior career legal official providing counsel to PHMSA’s Executive Team on a variety of complex legal and policy matters.   Along with the Chief Counsel, she has executive management oversight for the strategy and operations of the Office of Chief Counsel.  With a staff of approximately 40 persons, the Office of Chief Counsel supports PHMSA’s two major safety programs, as well as the entire agency’s operations.  Ms. Tsaganos leads the four legal divisions, comprised of the General Law Division, the Regulatory Affairs Division, the Hazardous Materials Safety Law Division, and the Pipeline Safety Law Division.   Ms. Tsaganos is also the Designated Ethics Official for PHMSA.

Ms. Tsaganos joined DOT in the spring of 2013, after twenty-three years in private practice.  Prior to joining PHMSA, Ms. Tsaganos was a Partner in the Corporate Department of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, a major international law firm, specializing in corporate transactions and corporate governance.   

Ms. Tsaganos has a B.A from The American University and a J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law.  She is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia.
### Stratigraphic studies of a late Quaternary barrier-type coastal complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay area, South Texas Gulf Coast

Edited by: G. L. Shideler

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1328

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf) 
- Table:  **Table 2**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 677

Expressing the commitment of the Members of the House of Representatives

to fostering a productive and collegial partnership with the 43rd President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 15, 2000

Ms. DUNN (for herself, Mr. DICKS, Mr. HASTERT, and Mr. ARMEY) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

DECEMBER 15, 2000

The Committee on Government Reform discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the commitment of the Members of the House

of Representatives to fostering a productive and collegial

partnership with the 43rd President.

Whereas the Presidential election in 2000 was the closest in

the Nation’s history;

Whereas both Governor George W. Bush and Vice President

Albert Gore campaigned admirably for the Presidency;

Whereas the closeness of the election led to a long and trying

process to determine the winner;

Whereas both Governor George W. Bush and Vice President

Albert Gore have called for national unity;
2

•HRES 677 ATH

Whereas, during this time of uncertainty, the American people have showed extraordinary patience and confidence in

the Nation’s system of government;

Whereas it is incumbent upon the Members of the House of

Representatives, as elected officials, to demonstrate that

the faith of the American people in the Nation’s governing institutions is warranted; and

Whereas the many issues confronting the Nation must be addressed for the benefit of those who have entrusted the

Government with their voice, the American people: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Members of the House of Rep2 resentatives are committed to fostering a productive and

3 collegial partnership with the 43rd President in order to

4 bring comity to the Government and progress to the

5 United States.

Æ