alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006178EN.01002801.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/28

---

Action brought on 12 June 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-258/06)

(2006/C 178/45)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Vidal Puig and N. Yerrell, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/92/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/92/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2002/92/EC into Spanish law expired on 15 January 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 9, 2003, p. 3.

1

---
### [§2792. Renumbered §451]
#### In the Matter of the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Margaret M. Case, as Administratrix, etc., of Joseph W. Case, Deceased.

—Motion denied.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 103

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the temporary

increase in unemployment tax.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. ALLARD (for himself. and Mr. ENZI:) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate

the temporary increase in unemployment tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TEMPORARY UNEMPLOYMENT TAX.

4 Section 3301 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

5 (relating to rate of unemployment tax) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘2007’’ in paragraph (1) and in7 serting ‘‘1999’’; and

8 (2) by striking ‘‘2008’’ in paragraph (2) and in9 serting ‘‘2000’’.

Æ
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Online Transactions: My Pension Benefit Access (MyPBA) FAQs 
-  Apply For or Update Direct Deposit 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Apply for or update direct deposit

## **Why**

                          - Electronic deposits are safe, secure, and simple, and they eliminate the risk of lost or stolen pension checks or postal delays.                             - 8 out of 9 payment delays are due to paper checks!
                            - More than one in every 200 paper checks is delayed, usually because of postal issues. Checks can also be lost or stolen.
                            - Fewer than one in every 4,000 EDD payments is delayed. 
                          - Your pension benefit is transferred to your account on the first business day of each month and your funds are available sooner than if you had to cash or deposit the check.                             - No more waiting until as late as the 7th of the month for a check.
                            - No more unnecessary trips to the bank to cash or deposit your check. 
                          - The deposit will be shown on your monthly statement, just like any other deposit.
                          - You also can confirm the deposit through other methods such as telephone banking, automated teller machines (ATMs), or computer banking services.

## **How**

                          - Use our online service  to apply for or update direct deposit

## **OR**

                          - Print, fill out, and mail  Form 710 Application for Electronic Deposit . Instructions and mailing address are included on the form.

January 23, 2024

##           Contact Us      

Visit our Contact Us page for more information.

##           Related Resources      

PBGC Payment Dates
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 87 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 87

   Electing members of the Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint 
                 Committee of Congress on the Library.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

Mr. Thomas submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Electing members of the Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint 
                 Committee of Congress on the Library.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected to the following joint committees of Congress, to serve with 
the chairman of the Committee on House Administration:
    Joint Committee of Congress on the Library: Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
Ehlers, Mr. Hoyer, and Mr. Davis of Florida.
    Joint Committee on Printing: Mr. Boehner, Mr. Ney, Mr. Hoyer, and 
Mr. Fattah.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Respondent-Appellee, *v.*Earl Johnson, Petitioner-Appellant.

(No. 60550;

First District (2nd Division)

December 10, 1974.

*738Paul Bradley and Lynn Sara Frackman, both of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM.
*Exhibit 32.2*

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-K of Mobetize Corp. for the annual period ended March 31,

2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Elena Karamushko do

hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-

Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial

condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations

of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

Dated:  July 11, 2016

/s/ Elena Karamushko

Elena Karamushko

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and

shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the

registrant for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This

certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as

amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of

this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and

will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff

upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Paul E. Martin, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofRenaissance Media Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana)LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and Renaissance MediaCapital Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  [Reserved];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2005    /s/ Paul E. Martin  Paul E. Martin  Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
13.2



CERTIFICATION
OF RICHARD PILLINGER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

BLUENRGY GROUP LIMITED PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of BlueNRGY Group Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending June
30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:



1.	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date:
October 28, 2016



|By: | /s/ Richard Pillinger                                                                | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|    | Name: Richard Pillinger
Title: Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William A. Donius, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                       |  |                                                
|----------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2005 |  | /s/ William A. Donius
|                  |  | Name:                 |  | William A. Donius                              
|                  |  | Title:                |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 637 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 313
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 637

                          [Report No. 106-989]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 114) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2000

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 114) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 114) making further continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.

                                                 House Calendar No. 313

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 637

                          [Report No. 106-989]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 114) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 18, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### § 700.549 Employee organizations.

An employee may not knowingly be a member of an organization of Government employees that advocates the overthrow of the United States' constitutional form of government (5 U.S.C. 7311). Employees are also prohibited from striking against the Federal Government. With these restrictions, an employee has the right to form, join, or assist lawful employee organizations. Similarly, an employee has also the right to refrain from such activity. In either case, the employee may exercise his or her right freely and without fear of penalty or reprisal and shall be protected in the exercise of such rights.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CFOCERTIFICATION**

 

                                                Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, asadopted), Carter D. Hicks, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Digital River, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

**1.****             **The Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005,and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

**2.****             **The informationcontained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiods presented therein.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,**the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 9th day of May 2005.

 
|   |   |   | /s/ Carter D. Hicks     |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   |                    |
|   |   |   | Carter D. Hicks         |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Digital River, Inc. and will be retained by DigitalRiver, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
# C_2006326EN.01006401.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/64

---

Action brought on 14 November 2006 — Budějovický Budvar v OHIM — Anheuser-Busch (BUD)

(Case T-309/06)

(2006/C 326/136)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik (České Budějovice, Czech Republic) (represented by F. Fajgenbaum, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | set aside the contested decision R 305/2005-2 of 1 September 2006 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested decision R 305/2005-2 of 1 September 2006 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM;

| — | reject application No 24 711 for registration of the word mark BUD for goods in Class 32; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject application No 24 711 for registration of the word mark BUD for goods in Class 32;

| — | transmit the decision of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities to OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

—

transmit the decision of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities to OHIM;

| — | order Anheuser-Busch to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Anheuser-Busch to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark BUD for goods in Class 32 — application No 24 711

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Right to the protected appellation of origin BUD for beer

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 62(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (1) and Article 20 of the implementing regulation No 2868/95 (2) in that the Board of Appeal does not have jurisdiction to rule on the validity of the appellation of origin relied on by the applicant in its opposition. The applicant also submits that the sign BUD constitutes an appellation of origin protected in France and Austria. It also relies on incorrect application of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 40/94 in that the appellation of origin BUD in its view does indeed constitute a sign used in the course of trade.

Pleas in law:

1

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1).

2

---
### [§2531. Renumbered §4851]
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Tony Walker, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-410;

Second District (1st Division)

January 24, 1975.

Ralph Ruebner, of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Elgin, for appellant.

John J. Bowman, State’s Attorney, of Wheaton (Malcolm F. Smith, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People,

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE GUILD.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

85-17 

June 10, 1985 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4204 Sale of Assets 

OPINION: 

This responds to your request for the PBGC's opinion concerning Section 4204 of ERISA. Specifically you wish

to know whether a seller and a purchaser can retroactively bring a sale of assets within the coverage of Section 4204 by

posting an appropriate bond and by amending the sales contract. 

Under Section 4204 a complete or partial withdrawal does not occur as a result of a bona fide, arm's length sale of

assets to an unrelated party if (1) the purchaser has an obligation to contribute for substantially the same number of

contribution base units for which the seller had an obligation to contribute; (2) the purchaser provides a bond for 5 plan

years following the sale; and (3) the contract for the sale provides that the seller is secondarily liable to the plan if the

purchaser withdraws during those 5 plan years and fails to pay its liability. 

If an employer ceases to contribute to a plan as a result of a sale of assets that fails to meet the conditions described

above, then a withdrawal may occur. Further, if the conditions are initially met, but there is a subsequent failure of

condition, then the plan find that a withdrawal has occured as of the date of the [*2] seller's cessation of contributions.

An example of when this may occur is when the purchaser fails to maintain a bond or escrow. See PBGC Opinion Letter

83-8 (March 25, 1983). 

Thus, it is a plan's responsibility to determine whether a withdrawal has occurred, including whether the conditions

of Section 4204 are met. Further, it is the PBGC's view that the plan has discretion in determining whether a condition

has been met in a timely fashion. Of course any dispute concerning a plan's determination of the applicability of Section

4204 is subject to the dispute resolution procedures contained in Sections 4219 and 4221 of ERISA. 

I hope this has been of assistance. If you have further questions concerning this matter please contact * * * of my

office at the above address or at (202) 254-4873. 

Edward R. Mackiewicz 

General Counsel