alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-3 

November 14, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 3(35) Definitions. Defined Benefit Plan

4021(b)(12) Plans Covered. Partial Individual Account Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your recent letter in which you request clarification of the following wording in the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act: "defined benefit plan to the extent that it is treated as an individual account plan under

paragraph 35(B) of Section 3 of this Act". 

This language is the basis of an exclusion from coverage provided in Section 4021(b)(12) of the Act. The exclusion

applies in the situation where the plan provides benefits a portion of which are defined and a portion of which are the

result of the investment experience of contributions to a separate account (as defined in Section 3(17) of the Act). To

the extent the plan benefits are based on the separate account they are variable rather than guaranteed and, accordingly,

to that extent the benefit is excluded from coverage under Section 4021(b)(12). 

Steven E. Schanes 

Acting Executive Director
### §1303. Rights and powers of debtor

Subject to any limitations on a trustee under this chapter, the debtor shall have, exclusive of the trustee, the rights and powers of a trustee under sections 363(b), 363(d), 363(e), 363(f), and 363(l), of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2646.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

Section 1303 of the House amendment specifies rights and powers that the debtor has exclusive of the trustees. The section does not imply that the debtor does not also possess other powers concurrently with the trustee. For example, although section 1323 is not specified in section 1303, certainly it is intended that the debtor has the power to sue and be sued.

#### senate report no. 95–989

A chapter 13 debtor is vested with the identical rights and powers, and is subject to the same limitations in regard to their exercise, as those given a liquidation trustee by virtue of section 363(b), (d), (e), (f), and (h) of title 11, relating to the sale, use or lease of property.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 MEMORY PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  /s/  Vaughn M. KailianVaughn M. KailianPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/  James R. SulatJames R. SulatChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)  
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. and will be retained by Memory
Pharmaceuticals Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by reference into any
filing of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. 32
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Joel A. Ronning, Chief Executive Officer of DigitalRiver, Inc. (the “Company”), and Carter D. Hicks, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2003 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company atthe end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and the results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

 
| Dated:     May  15, 2003 |   |                      |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                                              |   |                      |   |
|                                              | By:    | /s/  JOEL A. RONNING      |   |
|                                              |   | Joel  A. Ronning          |   |
|                                              |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |   |
|                                              |   |                      |   |
|                                              |   |                      |   |
|                                              | By:    | /s/  CARTER D. HICKS      |   |
|                                              |   | Carter  D. Hicks          |   |
|                                              |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

Pursuant to the Securities andExchange Commission’s interim guidance provided in the Release No. 33-8212, theforgoing certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 583.5 When will I receive a copy of the record on which the Chair relied?

Within 10 days of the filing of a notice of appeal, or as soon thereafter as practicable, the record will be transmitted to all parties.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010 __ -NM- 123 -AD ---

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

[ntrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it ]appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where avialion might be the only mode of

transportation? I
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SECURITIZATION OF THE DEPOSITOR PURSUANT TO RULE15D-14(D)**

I, Daniel McGrath, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SMART ABS Series 2016-2USTrust (the “**Exchange Act Periodic Reports**”); 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports; 

 
 4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

 
 5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and Perpetual Trustee Company Limited. 

Date: June 25, 2020 

 
Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited, as DepositorBy: 
/s/ Daniel McGrath
 Name: Daniel McGrath Title:   Division Director*
 
* 
Daniel McGrath is the senior officer in charge of securitization of Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited.
**
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





EXHIBIT 10.8




AMENDED SCHEDULE TO EXHIBIT 10.7




The persons listed on the table below have, as of the date indicated, each entered into an
agreement with the Company that is substantially identical to the Form of Indemnification Agreement
previously filed and referenced in Exhibit 10.7, except (i) with respect to the position held, the
gender and the name and address of the indemnitee and (ii) Section 7.5 thereof is only included in
agreements entered into with directors.



	 	 	 	 	 
	INDEMNITEE	 	POSITION	 	EFFECTIVE DATE
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Joe R. Davis

	 	Chief Executive Officer and Director
	 	June 30, 2004
	Larry J. Alexander

	 	Director
	 	June 30, 2004
	Brady F. Carruth

	 	Director
	 	June 30, 2004
	Gary L. Forbes

	 	Director
	 	June 30, 2004
	James H. Limmer

	 	Director
	 	June 30, 2004
	Hugh N. West

	 	Director
	 	June 30, 2004
	Jon Biro

	 	Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
And Secretary
	 	January 14, 2008
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.235 What personal conflicts of interest must the standards of conduct regulate?

The standards must prohibit an officer, employee, or agent (including a subcontractor) from participating in the review, analysis, or inspection of trust transactions involving an entity in which such persons have a direct financial interest or an employment relationship. It must also prohibit such officers, employees, or agents from accepting any gratuity, favor, or anything of more than nominal value, from a party (other than the Indian tribe) with an interest in the trust transactions under review. Such standards must also provide for sanctions or remedies for violation of the standards.
#### Nancy A. Herrera et al., Appellants, v A. Pegasus Limousine Corp. et al., Respondents.

[825 NYS2d 183]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered February 3, 2006, which, upon reargument, granted defendants’ motion for a change of venue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The initial selection of venue was based on evidence that defendant Ramos resided in Bronx County. Defendants timely demanded a change of venue based on improper designation (CPLR 510 [1]), and sought transfer to Nassau County, where plaintiffs resided (CPLR 511 [b]). Documentary proof was submitted that Ramos resided in New Jersey, and his affidavit and deposition testimony established that he did not reside in Bronx County at the time this action was commenced.

Plaintiffs’ claim of estoppel, based on their purported reliance on the Bronx address appearing on Ramos’s driver’s license and on the accident report, as well as his statement to plaintiffs’ investigator that he resided in the Bronx, is without merit under the circumstances. We note that plaintiffs never cross-moved to retain venue in Bronx County or to transfer venue to an alternative county *(see e.g. Montilla v River Park Assoc.,*282 AD2d 389 [2001]; *cf. Buterbaugh v Del Pesce,*160 AD2d 584 [1990]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ other arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
#### John Snowell *et al. v.*Joseph E. Moss.

*Amendment—of complaint in forcible detainer.*It is not error to permit an amendment of a complaint in forcible detainer, on appeal, after the submission of the cause to the court, where the amendment is not calculated to surprise the defendant.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William A. Portee, Judge, presiding.

This was an action of forcible detainer, brought by Joseph E. Moss, against John Snowell and Plenry Snowell. The following is a copy of the complaint:

“Joseph E. Moss complains, on oath, to H. B. Boyden, Esq., a justice of the peace in and for said county of Cook, that, on or about the 20th day of October, 1872, the following described premises, in the county of Cook, and State of Illinois, to-wit: (description here follows) were let by the said Joseph E. Moss to John Snowell and Henry Snowell, for the term of one year, which term has elapsed and determined, and a demand, in writing, by said Joseph E. Moss, has been duly served upon the said John Snowell and Henry Snowell, by delivering a copy thereof, on the 28th day of October, 1872, to said John Snowell and Henry Snow-ell, and the said Joseph E. Moss is now entitled to the possession of said premises; and that the said John Snowell and Henry Snowell wilfully, and without force, hold over such possession after the determination of the time for which said premises were let to the said John Snowell and Henry Snow-ell, and after such notice and demand; wherefore, said complainant prays a summons, in pursuance of the statute.

*“*Joseph E. Moss.”

*314The Superior Court, on appeal, allowed the plaintiff to amend the complaint, by changing the date of the leasing to 1871 instead of 1872, and so as to show that the demand mentioned was for the possession of the premises.

Messrs. King, Scott & Payson, for the appellants.

Mr. Kelson Monroe, for the appellee.

Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of forcible detainer, taken by appeal from a justice of the peace to the Superior Court of Cook county, and there tried by the court without a jury, and judgment of restitution.

It is objected, the court permitted an amendment of the complaint after the cause was submitted to the court, and before trial. The amendment made was not calculated to surprise the opposite party, but was in furtherance of justice, and properly allowed.

The real question in- the case is, did appellants promise, unconditionally, to pay rent for one year, to appellee, for these four or five feet of ground? This was a point strongly contested. The parties themselves were sworn, and there was conflict in their statements, which the court reconciled the best way possible, and we can not say improperly.

We can not disturb the finding, and affirm the judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 31

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. Thomas C. Bache, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Composite Solutions,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 13, 2004                    /s/ Dr. Thomas C. Bache
                                         ----------------------------------
                                    Dr. Thomas C. Bache, President & CEO


                                       21
# C_2006261EN.01003006.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/30

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2006 — Auto-en Carrosseriebedrij Ambting and Others v Commission

(Case T-15/00) (1)

1

(2006/C 261/62)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 13.5.2000.

1

---
#### § 81.41 Who certifies the results of the Election?

The Chair and all members of the Secretarial Election Board must be present during the counting of the ballots and must sign the Certificate of Results of Election.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2012, by andamong RBS Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administratorand Custodian, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Trimont RealEstate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates WFRBS 2012-C7 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms usedherein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# C_2006317EN.01000101.xml

| 23.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 December 2006

(2006/C 317/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3192 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4536 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9888 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6029 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,89 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1770 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5781 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,573 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6975 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8211 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3510 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,66 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,378 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8810 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6792 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5240 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2589 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8880 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0310 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 225,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2195 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3113 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3655 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 975,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6627 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,037 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7030 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,019 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3192

JPY

Japanese yen

156,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4536

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67150

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9888

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6029

ISK

Iceland króna

91,89

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1770

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5781

CZK

Czech koruna

27,573

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6975

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8211

RON

Romanian leu

3,3510

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,66

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,378

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8810

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6792

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5240

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2589

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8880

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0310

KRW

South Korean won

1 225,01

ZAR

South African rand

9,2195

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3113

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3655

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 975,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6627

PHP

Philippine peso

65,037

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7030

THB

Thai baht

48,019

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
##### 



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    
    EXHIBIT 32.2REGARDING FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDINGMARCH
31, 2004, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 I, Tanya Parents, Interim Chief Financial Officer of Specialty Trust, Inc.
(the Company), hereby state, certify and attest in this written statement that: (a) The quarterly report of the Company filed on form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Tanya Parents
    
    Dated this 17th of May, 2004Name: Tanya ParentsTitle: Interim Chief Financial Officer
 This
certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose. 32