alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_2\Routes_AltB.pdf

Location in Arizona

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Travel Management

Alternative B

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Legend

Map 2-20

Data Source:

OHV and Route Alternative Designations: BLM 2006

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: U.S. Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Note:

 Land use allocations, designations, and management 

 prescriptions apply only to public lands administered

 by the BLM. If non-Federal lands are acquired, they

 would be managed according to the allocations

 depicted on the map.

Off-highway Vehicle Designations

Limited to Designated Roads and Trails

Reference Information

Access Points

Access through Private Land

Access through State Trust Land

Access through Indian Land

Access through Public Land

Route Designations

Surface Management

American Indian Reservation

Military Reservations

State Trust Lands

State, County, City; Wildlife, Park and Outdoor Recreation

Areas

Private

Bureau of Land Management

Pima County

National Park Service

Bureau of Reclamation

Closed 

Closed for Reclamation

Non-motorized

Motorized
§ 19.12 Notifications to beneficiaries and applicants. ( a ) Organizations providing social services to beneficiaries under a program supported by direct Federal financial assistance from DHS must give written notice to beneficiaries and prospective beneficiaries of certain protections. Such notice must be given in a manner and form prescribed by DHS's Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, including by incorporating the notice into materials that are otherwise provided to beneficiaries. This written notice shall include language substantially similar to that in appendix C to this part.
( b ) The written notice described in paragraph (a) of this section must be given to prospective beneficiaries prior to the time the prospective beneficiary enrolls in the program or receives services from the program. When the nature of the service provided or exigent circumstances make it impracticable to provide such written notice in advance of the actual service, organizations must advise beneficiaries of their protections at the earliest available opportunity.
( c ) DHS may determine that the notice described in paragraph (a) of this section must inform each beneficiary or prospective beneficiary of the option to seek information from DHS, or a State agency or other entity administering the program, as to whether there are any other federally funded organizations in the area that provide the services available under the applicable program.
( d ) Notices or announcements of award opportunities and notices of award or contracts shall include language substantially similar to that in appendices A and B, respectively, to this part.
[89 FR 15706, Mar. 4, 2024]
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), We, Thomas J. Howells, President and Travis Jenson, Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Thomas J. Howells
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Thomas J. Howells
                                         President and director


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Travis Jenson
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Travis Jenson
                                         Secretary and director
# C_2007039EN.01000301.xml

| 23.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4445 — voestalpine/Stamptec)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 39/02)

On 6 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4445. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4445. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.154 How does an Indian tribe or tribal organization request an informal conference?

The Indian tribe or tribal organization shall file its request for an informal conference with the office of the person whose decision it is appealing, within 30 days of the day it receives the decision. The Indian tribe or tribal organization may either hand-deliver the request for an informal conference to that person's office, or mail it by certified mail, return receipt requested. If the Indian tribe or tribal organization mails the request, it will be considered filed on the date the Indian tribe or tribal organization mailed it by certified mail.
[No. 5074.]

[No. 2640 C. A.]

#### Whitmore et al. v. Gaston.

Former Opinion Followed.

The judgment in this case reversed and remanded for the - reasons stated in Whitmore et .al. v. Gaston, ante, p. 345.

*Appeal from the District Court of Teller ■County.*

*Hon. William P. Seeds, Judge.*

Action by A. B. Whitmore and G. C. Blakey against John C. Gaston. From a judgment for the latter, the former appeal.

*Reversed.*

Messrs. Potter & McCarthy, for appellants.

Mr. Justice Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court:

The facts in this case are the same as in *Whitmore et al. v. Gaston, ante,*page 345, and the decision there must govern here. For the reasons stated in *349the opinion in that case, the judgment must he reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed*

Chide Justice Gabbert and Mr. Justice Steele concur.
§ 227.4 Sale of oil and gas leases. ( a ) At such times and in such manner as he may deem appropriate, after being authorized by the Joint Business Council of the Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes or its authorized representative, the superintendent shall publish notices at least thirty days prior to the sale, unless a shorter period is authorized by the Secretary of the Interior or his authorized representative, that oil and gas leases on specific tracts, each of which shall be in a reasonably compact body, will be offered to the highest responsible bidder for a bonus consideration, in addition to stipulated rentals and royalties. Each bid must be accompanied by a cashier's check, certified check, or postal money order, payable to the payee designated in the invitation to bid, in an amount not less than 25 percent of the bonus bid. Within 30 days after notification of being the successful bidder, said bidder must remit the balance of the bonus, the first year's rental, and his share of the advertising costs, and shall file with the superintendent the lease in completed form. The superintendent may for good and sufficient reasons, extend the time for completion and submission of the lease form, but no extension shall be granted for remitting the balance of monies due. If the successful bidder fails to pay the full consideration within said period, or fails to file the completed lease within said period or extension thereof, or if the lease is disapproved through no fault of the lessor or the Department of the Interior, 25 percent of the bonus bid will be forfeited for the use and benefit of the Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes.
( b ) All notices or advertisements of sales of oil and gas leases shall reserve to the Secretary of the Interior the right to reject all bids when in his judgment the interests of the Indians will be best served by so doing, and that if no satisfactory bid is received, or if the accepted bidder fails to complete the lease, or if the Secretary of the Interior shall determine that it is unwise in the interests of the Indians to accept the highest bid, the Secretary may readvertise such lease for sale, or if deemed advisable, with the consent of the tribal council or other governing tribal authorities, a lease may be made by private negotiations. The successful bidder or bidders will be required to pay his or their share of the advertising costs. Amounts received from unsuccessful bidders will be returned; but when no bid is accepted on a tract, the costs of advertising will be assessed against the applicant who requested that said tract be advertised.
[22 FR 10622, Dec. 24, 1957, as amended at 25 FR 7185, July 29, 1960. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
H. Res. 591

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 26, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 109)

making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001,

and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and

(2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2006294EN.01001601.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État, France ) — Nicolae Bot v Préfet du Val-de-Marne

(Case C-241/05) (1)

1

(Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement - Article 20(1) - Conditions of movement of nationals of a third country not subject to a visa requirement - Maximum stay for a period of three months during the six months following the date of first entry into the Schengen Area - Successive stays - Definition of ‘first entry’)

(2006/C 294/26)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d'État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nicolae Bot

Applicant:

Defendant: Préfet du Val-de-Marne

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conseil d'Etat (France) — Interpretation of Article 20(1) of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders (OJ 2000 L 239, p. 19) — Meaning of first entry into the territories of the Contracting Parties

Operative part of the judgment

Article 20(1) of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders, signed on 19 June 1990 at Schengen, is to be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘first entry’ in that provision refers, besides the very first entry into the territories of the Contracting States to that agreement, to the first entry into those territories taking place after the expiry of a period of six months from that very first entry and also to any other first entry taking place after the expiry of any new period of six months following an earlier date of first entry.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 06.08.2005.

1

---
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-59 

April 29, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043(b)(7) Reportable Events. Substantial Owner Distributions 

OPINION: 

 Your letter of November 20, 1975 to the Department of Labor on behalf of * * * (the "Plan") concerning certain

possible reportable events has been referred to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") for reply. 

Based on our review of your letter and copies of the complaints filed against the Plan in the Court of Common Pleas,

Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, we have determined that no event described in § 4043(b) of the Employee Retirement

Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") has occurred. However, since * * * is, or was within the last sixty months, a

substantial owner, as defined in § 4022(b)(6) of the Act, we draw your attention to § 4043(b)(7) of the Act. Under that

section, the distribution of $10,000 or more under a plan to a participant who was a substantial owner within sixty months

of the date of the distribution is a reportable event if the distribution is not a benefit payable with respect to the death

of the participant and if immediately after the distribution, the plan has nonforfeitable benefits which are not fully funded.

If such a distribution occurs, then pursuant to § 4043(a) of the [*2] Act, the plan administrator must so notify the PBGC

within 30 days after its occurrence. Such notice should be sent to * * * PBGC. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### §§1121 to 1128. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 1121, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §211(a), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1459, related to offenses by officers, employees, or agents. See sections 657 and 1006 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Section 1122, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §211(b), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1459, related to false statements to banks. See section 1014 of Title 18.

Section 1123, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §211(c), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1459, related to overvaluation of property for loan purposes. See section 1014 of Title 18.

Section 1124, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §211(d), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1459, related to offenses by examiners. See sections 1907 and 1909 of Title 18.

Section 1125, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §211(e), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1459, related to offenses by officers, employees, and agents. See section 215 of Title 18.

Section 1126, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §211(f), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1459, related to forgery and counterfeiting offenses. See section 493 of Title 18.

Section 1127, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §211(g), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1459, related to false representations as to debentures, etc., of banks. See section 1013 of Title 18.

Section 1128, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §211(h), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1459, related to use of words "Federal intermediate credit bank". See section 709 of Title 18.
-  Home 

# Data Management & IT Modernization Roadmap

PHMSA IT Roadmap.pdf (1.42 MB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4687]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MB Docket No. 10-108; Report No. 2925]


Petition for Reconsideration of Action of Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, a Petition for Reconsideration (Petition) 
has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this 
document (Table of Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations (Pacific Junction, 
Iowa)).

DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must be filed by March 18, 2011. 
Replies to an opposition must be filed March 28, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of Commission's document, 
Report No. 2925, released February 7, 2011. The full text of this 
document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th 
Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's 
copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
The Commission will not send a copy of this Notice pursuant to the 
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because this Notice 
does not have an impact on any rules of particular applicability.
    This document is published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See 
1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)).
    Subject: In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of 
Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations (Pacific Junction, Iowa) (MB Docket 
No. 10-108).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-4687 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 15, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Cara Mulder,*                     Prinsburg, Minnesota, to join a group acting in concert with Myron Mulder, Prinsburg, Minnesota; to acquire and retain control of PSB Financial Shares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire and retain control of Prinsbank, both in Prinsburg, Minnesota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 23, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-4356 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P