alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 227.26 Assignments and overriding royalties. ( a ) Leases, or any interest therein, may be assigned or transferred only with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, and to procure such approval the assignee must be qualified to hold such lease under existing rules and regulations, and shall furnish a satisfactory bond for the faithful performance of the covenants and conditions thereof. No lease or any interest therein, or the use of such lease, shall be assigned, sublet, or transferred directly or indirectly, by working or drilling contract, or otherwise without the consent of the Secretary of the Interior. Assignments of leases shall be filed with the superintendent within 20 days after the date of execution.
( b ) An agreement creating overriding royalties or payments out of production under this part shall be subject to the provisions of § 211.26(d) of this chapter, or as hereafter amended.
[22 FR 10622, Dec. 24, 1957, as amended at 23 FR 9759, Dec. 18, 1958. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
# C_2006291EN.01000101.xml

| 30.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 November 2006

(2006/C 291/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3157 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 153,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4547 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67430 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0801 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5889 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,61 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2520 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5780 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,988 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 257,16 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6978 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8243 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4610 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 35,531 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9330 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6800 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4953 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2303 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9398 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0333 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 224,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3790 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3036 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3532 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 060,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7727 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,430 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6550 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,477 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3157

JPY

Japanese yen

153,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4547

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67430

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0801

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5889

ISK

Iceland króna

90,61

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2520

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5780

CZK

Czech koruna

27,988

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

257,16

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6978

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8243

RON

Romanian leu

3,4610

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

35,531

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9330

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6800

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4953

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2303

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9398

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0333

KRW

South Korean won

1 224,39

ZAR

South African rand

9,3790

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3036

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3532

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 060,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7727

PHP

Philippine peso

65,430

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6550

THB

Thai baht

47,477

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels

On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national emergency was declared to address the disturbance or threatened disturbance of international relations caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the Cuban government of two unarmed U.S.-registered civilian aircraft in international airspace north of Cuba.  On February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, the national emergency was extended and its scope was expanded to deny monetary and material support to the Cuban government.  The Cuban government has not demonstrated that it will refrain from the use of excessive force against U.S. vessels or aircraft that may engage in memorial activities or peaceful protest north of Cuba.  In addition, the unauthorized entry of any U.S.-registered vessel into Cuban territorial waters continues to be detrimental to the foreign policy of the United States.  Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority relating to the regulation of the anchorage and movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867 as amended by Proclamation 7757.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                        and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2011-4596

Billing code 3195-W1-P
### Part B—Dissolution

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §418(a)(1), formerly §415(a)(1), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1653, renumbered §418(a)(1), Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §409(a), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1003, substituted "Dissolution" for "Dissolution and merger" as part B heading.
# C_2006261EN.01002901.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/29

---

Action brought on 18 September 2006 — Neoperl Servisys v OHIM (HONEYCOMB)

(Case T-256/06)

(2006/C 261/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Neoperl Servisys AG (Reinach, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Börjes-Pestalozza, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul contested decision R1388/2005-4 and order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to publish Community trade mark application No 2 906 139 for the purpose of its registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul contested decision R1388/2005-4 and order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to publish Community trade mark application No 2 906 139 for the purpose of its registration;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘HONEYCOMB’ for goods in Class 11 — Application No 2 906 139.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), because the sign applied for was assessed incorrectly both as a whole and in relation to its individual elements and the assessment of the relevant public was made subject to a clearly exaggerated perception of the public.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2007029EN.01000901.xml

| 9.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 February 2007

(2007/C 29/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2991 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4529 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66320 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0947 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6232 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,36 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0955 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5791 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,212 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,12 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8764 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3742 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,583 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8263 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6669 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5413 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1533 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8954 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9926 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 214,72 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3034 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0659 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3811 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 760,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5397 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,883 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2690 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,401 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2991

JPY

Japanese yen

157,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4529

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66320

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0947

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6232

ISK

Iceland króna

88,36

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0955

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5791

CZK

Czech koruna

28,212

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,12

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8764

RON

Romanian leu

3,3742

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,583

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8263

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6669

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5413

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1533

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8954

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9926

KRW

South Korean won

1 214,72

ZAR

South African rand

9,3034

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0659

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3811

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 760,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5397

PHP

Philippine peso

62,883

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2690

THB

Thai baht

44,401

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Trusteeship 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Plan Status - Trusteeship

PBGC has taken over as trustee of your pension plan. PBGC is now responsible for paying your pension benefits up to the limits set by law.

**What this means for you:**
                          - Expect a letter in the mail from PBGC informing you that we are now responsible for paying your pension benefits.
                          - If you are already receiving pension benefits from your plan, we will continue paying you without interruption. These payments will be an estimate of the benefits that PBGC can pay. Your benefit may be adjusted for the limits set by law. Due to these limits, some participants may receive a pension benefit that is less than the amount provided for by the plan.
                          - If you are not yet receiving pension benefits, find out more about when you can apply for a pension, here:  Apply for your pension benefits . To find out more about PBGC and the limits set by law, see:  Maximum monthly guarantee tables ,  Payment Amount

**PBGC's Next Steps:**

**PBGC will**

Collect and verify information about all participants and beneficiaries

Review and verify plan and participant records

Calculate benefits, subject to legal limits, owed to all participants and beneficiaries

November 2, 2018

##           Contact Us          

Visit our Contact Us page for more information.
# C_2006326EN.01001802.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de travail de Liège — Belgium) — Monique Chateignier v Office national de l'emploi (ONEM)

(Case C-346/05) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 39 EC and Articles 3 and 67 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Grant of unemployment benefit subject to the completion of a period of employment in the competent Member State)

(2006/C 326/36)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Monique Chateignier

Applicant:

Defendant: Office national de l'emploi (ONEM)

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour de travail de Liège — Interpretation of Article 39(2) EC,

Operative part of the judgment

Article 39(2) EC and Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, are to be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which the competent institution of the Member State of residence denies unemployment benefits to a national of another Member State on the ground that, on the date when the benefit claim was submitted, the person concerned had not completed a specified period of employment in that Member State of residence, whereas there is no such requirement for nationals of that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 10.12.2005.

1

---
#### § 213.16 Additional information may be requested by Area Director.

The Area Director, or other Government officer having the matter in charge or under investigation, may, at any time, either before or after approval of a lease, call for any additional information desired to carry out the purpose of the regulations in this part, and such information shall be furnished within the time specified in the request therefor. If the lessee fails to furnish the information requested, the lease will be subject to disapproval or cancellation, whichever is appropriate.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.115 How do self-determination construction contracts relate to ordinary Federal procurement contracts? ( a ) A self-determination construction contract is a government-to-government agreement that transfers control of the construction project, including administrative functions, to the contracting Indian tribe or tribal organization to facilitate effective and meaningful participation by the Indian tribe or tribal organization in planning, conducting, and administering the construction project, and so that the construction project is responsive to the true needs of the Indian community. The Secretary's role in the conduct of a contracted construction project is limited to the Secretary's responsibilities set out in § 900.131.
( b ) Self-determination construction contracts are not traditional “procurement” contracts. ( 1 ) With respect to a construction contract (or a subcontract of such a construction contract), the provisions of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 *et seq.*) and the regulations promulgated under that Act, shall apply to a construction contract or subcontract only to the extent that application of the provision is: ( i ) Necessary to ensure that the contract may be carried out in a satisfactory manner;
( ii ) Directly related to the construction activity; and
( iii ) Not inconsistent with the Act.
( 2 ) A list of the Federal requirements that meet the requirements of this paragraph shall be included in an attachment to the contract under negotiations between the Secretary and the Indian tribe or tribal organization.
( 3 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, no Federal law listed in section 105(3)(C)(ii) of the Act or any other provision of Federal law (including an Executive order) relating to acquisition by the Federal government shall apply to a construction contract that an Indian tribe or tribal organization enters into under this Act, unless expressly provided in the law.
( c ) Provisions of a construction contract under this subpart shall be liberally construed in favor of the contracting Indian tribe or tribal organization.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-128 

February 4, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(9) Plans Covered. Substantial Owner Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of * * * and our conference with * * * of * * *, wherein you requested a

determination by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation that * * * (the "Plan") is excluded from coverage by Title

IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") by reason of § 4021(b)(9) of the Act. 

You indicated that since the date of enactment of the Act, the sole participant of the Plan continuously owned more

than 10 percent of the outstanding stock of * * * and more than 10 percent of the outstanding stock of * * * and that each

corporation, throughout this period, had outstanding only one class of stock. You further stated that another individual,

not a substantial owner, participated in the Plan before the enactment of the Act, but that only the present participant

participated after the date of enactment and is entitled to be credited with service or receive any benefit under the Plan.

On the basis of the facts herein, the Plan is excluded from coverage under Title IV of the Act. Since on the

subsequent to September 2, 1974, the only participant entitled to be credited with service or receive [*2] any benefit

under the plan has continuously fallen within the definition of a "substantial owner" under § 4022(b)(6)(A)(iii) of the

Act, the Plan is excluded from coverage by Title IV of the Act by reason of § 4021(b)(9) of the Act. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

Ragged Top

VHA

Waterman

Mountains

VHA

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

Map 2-4

Data Source:

VHMA Alternatives: BLM 2005

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: US Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_2\Veg_RaggedTop_AltB-C.pdf

Location in Arizona

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Special Status

Species Management

Alternative B-C

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Legend

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Note:

 Land use allocations, designations, and management 

 prescriptions apply only to public lands administered

 by the BLM. If non-Federal lands are acquired, they

 would be managed according to the allocations

 depicted on the map.

Vegetation Habitat Management Area (VHA)

Reference Information

Surface Management

American Indian Reservation

Military Reservations

State Trust Lands

State, County, City; Wildlife, Park and Outdoor Recreation

Areas

Private

Bureau of Land Management

Pima County

National Park Service

Bureau of Reclamation
AFS-13-199-E 

February 19, 2013 

Mr. John W. Andrick 

President 

Professional Beechcraft Pilot Training, Inc. dba Beechcraft Pilot Training 

20-695 Kessler Farm Drive 

Nashua, NH 03063 

Dear Mr. Andrick: 

This letter is in response to your correspondence sent to the public docket dated 

December 21, 2013 (public docket No. FAA-2013-0104) petitioning the Federal Aviation 

Administration for an exemption from § 91.109(b) of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). 

That exemption, if granted, would allow Professional Beechcraft Pilot Training, Inc. dba 

Beechcraft Pilot Training to conduct certain flight training and to provide simulated 

instrument flight experience in certain Beechcraft aircraft equipped with a functioning 

throwover wheel. 

On August 31, 2011, the FAA amended 14 CFR part 91 related to throwover control wheels 

(76 FR 54095). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information. 

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action 

on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of RLJ Entertainment, Inc.; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | April 25, 2014 | /s/ MIGUEL PENELLA      |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|
|   |           | Miguel Penella          |
|   |           | Chief Executive Officer |

----
#### Brassard *v.*Stoner et al.

[No. 12,089.

Filed November 25, 1925.]

From Newton Circuit Court; *Charles M. Snyder,*Special Judge.

Action by Victor Brassard against Oliver F. Stoner and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*John A. Dunlap, M. E. Graves*and *T. B. Cunningham,*for appellant.

*James C. Murphy*and *Hanley & Hanley,*for appellees.

Remy, C. J.

Proceeding supplementary to execution by appellant against appellees; from a judgment for appellees, this *738appeal is prosecuted. The only question for consideration by this court is the sufficiency of the evidence. There is competent evidence to sustain the decision.

After the trial court had overruled the motion for a new trial in this cause, at a, subsequent term of court, and more than thirty days after the judgment had been rendered, appellant instituted an independent proceeding for new trial, which resulted in a judgment for appellees. From that judgment there was an appeal to this court. See, *Brassard*v. *Stoner*(1925), *ante*655, 149 N. E. 646.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 565 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 27, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4516) making 
appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2001, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```