alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### [§167a. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §812(a)(1)(A), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1846]

Section, added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VIII, §848(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1554; amended Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VIII, §846(a), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3391; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title VIII, §825, Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 227, provided for delegation of limited acquisition authority to the commander of the unified combatant command for joint warfighting experimentation.
# C_2006326EN.01001901.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-77/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/42/EC - Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment - Failure to implement within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 326/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Hottiaux and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: S. Schreiner, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ 2001 L 197, p. 30)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.03.2006.

1

---
### §177a. Funds available for cost of transporting and redeeming national and Federal Reserve bank notes

The cost of transporting and redeeming outstanding national bank notes and Federal Reserve bank notes as may be presented to the Treasurer of the United States for redemption shall be paid from the regular annual appropriation for the Department of the Treasury.

(Oct. 10, 1940, ch. 841, 54 Stat. 1093; Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(g)(10), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2294.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–325 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "After the reimbursement to the Treasury from funds derived from assessments made pursuant to section 177 of this title, of all costs lawfully charged thereto for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1941, the balance of such funds shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts; and thereafter the cost of transporting and redeeming such outstanding national bank notes and Federal Reserve bank notes as may be presented to the Treasurer of the United States for redemption shall be paid from the regular annual appropriations for the Treasury Department."
#### Pedersen Manufacturing Company, Appellant, *v.*Walter Automobile Company, Respondent.

First Department,

February 21, 1908.

Motion and order — affidavits in support of attachment.

When a motion to vacate a warrant of attachment is made upon affidavits the court may consider additional affidavits in support of tlie attachment.

Where such additional affidavits aver positively that the defendant is a foreign corporation and incorporate a telegram from a foreign secretary of state to that effect, and the defendant’s affidavits do not deny thaf .it is a foreign corporation, the attachment should not be vacated.

Appeal by the plaintiff, the Pedersen Manufacturing Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 11th day of November, 1907, vacating a warrant of attachment theretofore issued herein.

*George Whitefield Betts, Jr.,*of counsel *[Hunt, Hill & Betts,*attorneys], for the appellant.

*Jacob Newman,*for the respondent. '

Clarke, J.:

This is an action brought to recover for goods sold and delivered to the defendant, alleged in the complaint to be a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey. The *322motion was made upon affidavits to set aside the attachment which had been granted. The c'ourt, therefore, had the right to consider the additional affidavits offeréd and received upon the return of the order to'show cause in support of the attachment, wherein the' fact is positively sworn to that the defendant is a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, a telegram from, the- Secretary of State’-of New Jersey to that effect being incorporated therein. This, in view of the argumentative affidavit of defendant’s counsel and the fact that, although the president of the defendant makes an affidavit, he does not deny that the defendant is a foreign corporation, satisfies us that upon these papers the attachment ought not to have been vacated.

The order appealed from should, therefore, he reversed and the attachment reinstated, with ten dollars costs. and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to vacate the attachment denied, with ten dollars "costs. '

Patterson, P. J., In.graham, Laughlin .and- Houghton, JJ., concurred. .....

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY ) 

SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, ) 

 ) 

 Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D13-4258 

 ) 

KEITH GAPUTIS, ) 

 ) 

 Respondent. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed August 8, 2014. 

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit 

Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit for 

Pinellas County; sitting in its appellate 

capacity. 

Stephen D. Hurm, General Counsel and 

Damaris E. Reynolds, Assistant General 

Counsel, Department of Highway Safety & 

Motor Vehicles, Tallahassee, for Petitioner. 

Anne Morris of Isaak Law, PLLC, Tampa, 

for Respondent. 

LaROSE, Judge. 
- 2 - 

The Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles seeks certiorari relief 

from the circuit court's order granting Keith Gaputis's writ of prohibition. We have 

jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B). We deny the petition. 

This case involves a driver's license suspension. See § 322.2615(1), Fla. 

Stat. (2011). After a formal review hearing, see § 322.2615(6), the Department entered 

a final order upholding Mr. Gaputis's license suspension. By certiorari petition to the 

circuit court, Mr. Gaputis challenged the Department's final order. See 

§§ 322.2615(14), .31. He argued that he had been denied procedural due process in 

the Department's administrative hearing process. The circuit court agreed, granted the 

petition, and quashed the Department's final order. 

The circuit court did not remand the matter to the Department. However, 

the Department attempted to proceed with another formal administrative review hearing. 

Mr. Gaputis then filed a petition for writ of prohibition in the circuit court because his 

suspension period had expired. The circuit court granted the petition. It found 

controlling McLaughlin v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 128 So. 3d 

815, 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (noting that when the Department administratively 

suspends a driver's license, and the suspension period expires while a matter is under 

review but the department seeks further formal administrative hearings, the circuit court 

should quash the administrative order, rather than quash and remand for further 

proceedings; "no further proceedings are necessary on remand because the issue of 

the validity of the suspension of [the] driver's license is moot"). 

The Department now claims, incorrectly, that the circuit court applied the 

wrong law. As we recently stated in Forth v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor 
- 3 - 

Vehicles, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D1352 (Fla. 2d DCA June 27, 2014), McLaughlin is the 

correct applicable law. 

Petition denied. 

ALTENBERND and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
#### § 286.18 Written notice.

The applicant for a grant which is disapproved will be notified by letter, stating the reasons for disapproval and the right of appeal pursuant to 25 CFR 2. A copy of the letter will be sent to the prospective lender.

[39 FR 44748, Dec. 27, 1974. Redesignated at 47 FR 13328, Mar. 30, 1982; 48 FR 13414, Mar. 31, 1983]
#### § 700.501 Statement of purpose.

This part prescribes appropriate standards of conduct and responsibilites, financial disclosure reports, and rules of ethics in the conduct of Government business that are mandatory for all who serve with the Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Commission, and in order to implement the requirements of law, Executive Order 11222 and 5 CFR part 905. The rules promulgated by the Commission as essential to agency operations are in addition to the criminal laws and other laws governing conduct of Federal employees. Like the laws, they will be strictly interpreted and firmly enforced. Ignorance of these rules or laxity in observance or enforcement of them will not be condoned. They are the prime responsibility of all Commission personnel.
BATHYMETRIC MAP

Peitchaed 1 Wateegien. OC
U5. DEPARTMENT CF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATNOSFHEIT ADWINISTRATON
MATIONAL OCEar SERAICE
iene

feteereab ling COMMUN wetasvALS JC METERS PO man MRtHA ORRIN, ttt
0 METERS TEY eeadeesin DAFT unMPiRAMESORAKY WY LE TER 2UTEVALS

DATin MEAN LOW WATE

TACIT REACH MICO
feos 1350.00

ATLANTIC OCEAN
JORDAN BASIN

JORDAN BASIN
NOS NK 19-3
[ERRATA] 

INTERNET DATA BROKERS: 

WHO HAS ACCESS TO YOUR 

PRIVATE RECORDS? 

HEARINGS 

BEFORE THE 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND 

INVESTIGATIONS 

OF THE 

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND 

COMMERCE 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

JUNE 21, JUNE 22, AND SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Serial No. 109-131 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house 

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 

WASHINGTON : 2006 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office 

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 

Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 

31-363PDF 
ERRATA 

 The referenced hearings held before the House Committee on Energy and 

Commerce were inadvertently printed with the wrong serial number 109-130. 

The correct serial number is 109-131.
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Manchester United plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Bolingbroke, Chief Operating Officer of the Company and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (i)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: 24 October 2013  By:
/s/ Michael   BolingbrokeMichael   BolingbrokeChief   Operating Officer(Principal   Financial Officer)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-12 

January 27, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(1). Plans covered. Individual Account Plans

4041(f). Termination by Plan Administrator. Application of Termination Procedures Upon Amendment to Individual

Account Plan 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your inquiry concerning the conversion of a defined benefit plan to a "target" or "assumed"

benefit plan. 

As you may know, this Corporation insures basic benefits upon termination of certain tax qualified, defined benefit

pension plans, Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") § 4021(a). Certain plans, such as

individual account plans, are specifically excluded from coverage under the plan termination insurance program. Act

4021(b). Where an amendment to a covered plan results in the plan's exclusion from coverage, the plan is treated as

terminated upon the adoption of such an amendment. Act § 4041(f). 

Generally, a " target" or "assumed" benefit plan provides an individual account for each participant, and a benefit

based on the value of the participant's individual account. Target plans of this type are excluded from coverage under

Act § 4021(b)(1). However, some target benefit plans may not operate this way and be covered by the plan termination

insurance program. [*2] Since you have not submitted to us the proposed amendment to your client's plan, we are unable

to determine whether the amendment would result in a termination of the plan. 

If the amendment to the plan results in the plan's termination, a notice of termination must be filed with this

Corporation. See Act § 4041(a) and C.F.R. 2604, Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 179, Monday, September 15, 1975.

Upon receipt of the notice of termination, this Corporation will determine if possible, after assets are allocated in

accordance with § 4044 of the Act, whether the plan is able to discharge its obligations with respect to basic benefits.

No distributions pursuant to the plan's termination may be made before 90 days after the proposed date of termination

or receipt of a notice of sufficiency, whichever is earlier. 

It may be possible to transfer the value of earned benefits to individual accounts in the amended plan if employees

are given a choice of receiving their benefits in the form of a paid-up annuity or having an amount equal to the value of

their benefits tranferred to their individual account in the amended plan. 

Irrespective of whether your plan is amended, premiums continue [*3] to accrue until the plan's assets are

distributed pursuant to a termination procedure, or until a trustee is appointed pursuant to § 4042 of the Act, whichever

is earlier. 

I hope this information is helpful. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 61

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture in

the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. COMBEST (for himself and Mr. STENHOLM) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Agriculture in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Commit5 tee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses,

8 not more than $8,564,493 for the One Hundred Sixth

9 Congress.
2

•HRES 61 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $4,175,983 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1999, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 2000; and

7 (2) not more than $4,388,510 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 2000, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 2001.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Insignia  Properties Trust September 30, 1998 Form 10-Q and is qualified in
     its entirety by reference to such 10-Q filing.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001062508
<NAME>                        Insignia Properties Trust
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         56,085
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 322,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       235
<OTHER-SE>                                     195,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   322,111
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,592
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .59
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), We, Thomas J. Howells, President and Travis Jenson, Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Thomas J. Howells
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Thomas J. Howells
                                         President and director


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Travis Jenson
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Travis Jenson
                                         Secretary and director
§ 11.409 Reckless burning or exploding. A person commits a misdemeanor if he or she purposely starts a fire or causes an explosion, whether on his or her property or another's, and thereby recklessly: ( a ) Places another person in danger of death or bodily injury; or
( b ) Places a building or occupied structure of another in danger of damage or destruction.
# CA2006317EN.01000301.xml

| 23.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 317/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 317/3

---

Vacancies in the Directorate-General Legal Services

Legal Counsels

(2006/C 317 A/01)

The European Central Bank is seeking applications to fill positions of Legal Counsels in the Directorate-General Legal Services. More details on the profile and tasks covered in this position, as well as information on how to apply can be obtained on the ECB's website at www.ecb.int (Job opportunities).

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****FDA CDRHannual report**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.4601:
ItemNumber:0499-L-16(online)
CGPSystem Number:000599161
 
 
1997
1998
1999
2000
2003
2004
2005
2006**