alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006294EN.01004901.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/49

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006 — Rodenbröker and Others v Commission

(Case T-117/05) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Decision 2004/813/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region - Persons directly and individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/103)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Andreas Rodenbröker (Hövelhof, Germany) and the other 81 applicants whose names appear in the Annex to the order (represented by: H. Glatzel, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beek and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 387, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the Commission, including those relating to the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the Commission, including those relating to the application for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

1

---
| (logo) plante moran | **Plante & Moran, PLLC**

10 South Riverside Plaza

9th floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.207.1040

Fax: 312.207.1066

plantemoran.com |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

 

We have examined National TaxSearch, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe National Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certainservicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to theactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

 

Management is responsible forthe Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliancewith the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination wasconducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactionsand compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination periodand determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performedthose activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing ofselected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations,reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythis report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may haveoccurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this reportfor the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicingcriteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform isfairly stated in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

 

Chicago, IL

January 27, 2017

 

 

(logo) Praxity 

MEMBER

GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF 

INDEPENDENT FIRMS
#### Steven B. Shapiro, Appellant, v OneBeacon Insurance Co. et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 46]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J), entered June 16, 2005, which, inter alia, granted the cross motion of defendant insurer to the extent of declaring that defendant had no obligation to defend or indemnify plaintiff in the underlying guardianship proceeding *260and in the subsequent action commenced against plaintiff by Fensterstock & Partners, LLI) the attorneys retained by plaintiff to represent him in the guardianship proceeding, and otherwise dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly found that no coverage existed with respect to allegations made in the guardianship matter or the Fensterstock lawsuit. In the guardianship matter, the successor trustees sought disgorgement of fees paid plaintiff, on the basis of an alleged breach of fiduciary duty, and asked that the court deny plaintiffs petitions for further payments. The allegations sounded in breach of fiduciary duty, self-dealing, and incompetence as a guardian, and sought a reduction or denial of compensation to plaintiff for services purportedly rendered by him as guardian. The successor trustees did not seek to hold plaintiff liable for personal injury, but rather, alleged that plaintiffs improper conduct as a fiduciary warranted disgorgement of fees already paid. The policy at issue provides coverage for amounts the insured is legally obligated to pay by virtue of personal injury or property damage. Moreover, the risk of being directed to return improperly acquired funds is not insurable and restitution of such funds does not constitute “damages” or “loss” as those terms are used in insurance policies *(see Vigilant Ins. Co. v Credit Suisse First Boston Corp.,*10 AD3d 528 [2004]; *Reliance Group Holdings v National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.,*188 AD2d 47, 55 [1993], *lv dismissed in part and denied in part*82 NY2d 704 [1993]). Accordingly, the motion court properly held that plaintiff is not entitled to coverage in connection with the guardianship matter. Also proper was its determination of noncoverage with respect to the Fensterstock suit. The claims in that suit, seeking unpaid legal fees and sounding in breach of contract and account stated, did not set forth claims coming within the policy’s coverage.

The motion court also correctly found that plaintiff was not entitled to a defense from defendant in either the guardianship matter or the Fensterstock suit. In neither matter did the allegations against plaintiff state a claim suggesting a reasonable possibility of coverage *(see Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford v Cook,*7 NY3d 131, 137 [2006]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
# C_2006283EN.01000802.xml

| 21.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/8

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4267 — Deutsche Börse/Euronext)

(2006/C 283/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004

On 13 October 2006, the Commission of the European Communities received notification of a proposed concentration between Deutsche Börse AG and Euronext N.V. On 17 November 2006, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---
#### § 700.43 Assistance payment.

An assistance payment is the additional payment made to the certified eligible head of household pursuant to section 14(b) of the Act. This term is synonymous with “incentive bonus”.
Mile Wide Rd.

06

PORTPT TTI IE TIE! g

07
Ironwood Forest
National Monument

19

|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|

31

05

08

“29

32

04

OY

21 »
§
3
fog
|___{#___8
28
33

Mile Wide Rd.

03

10

22

27

34

02 {

11

26

35

01

12

24

25

36

TRAVEL MANAGEMENT

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft Resource Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
March 2007

TRAVEL ROUTE INVENTORY

Township 14 South
Range 11 East

Gila and Salt River Principal Meridian, Arizona

National Monument Boundary

Public Lands Administered by the
Bureau of Land Management

State Trust Lands

Military Reservation

—— Monument Travel Route Inventory

Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheriod

NAD27 Datum

A

i} 1 Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
for the use of this map for purposes not intended by the BLM, or
to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information
shown. Spatial information may not meet National map Accuracy
Standards. This information may be updated without notification.

(S23) United States Department of the Interior
$5 Bureau of Land Management
YSZ’ Tucson Field Orfce

Arizona

S
§ 41.59 When will grant funds be paid? ( a ) Initial grant funds will be paid in an advance installment of not less than 40 percent of the funds available for allotment by October 1st.
( b ) The remainder of the grant funds will be paid by July 1st after the BIE adjusts the amount to reflect any overpayments or underpayments made in the first disbursement.
H. Res. 616

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 11, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 4205) to authorize appropriations for fiscal

year 2001 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.

All points of order against the conference report and against

its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be

considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
-  Home 
-  International Program 

# In This Section

                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  United Nations Sub-Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods 
                      -  International Civil Aviation Organization 
                      -  International Maritime Organization 
                      -  International Atomic Energy Agency 
                      -  Global Harmonization of Hazard Classification and Labeling Systems 
                      -  ADR and RID 
                      -  Trade Facilitation 
                      -  International List of Competent Authorities 

## Contact Us

Hazardous Materials International Program
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**PHMSAinternationalprogram@dot.gov**Phone:**+1 202-366-9141****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Trade Facilitation

## About Trade Facilitation and Country Partnerships

PHMSA engages in bi-lateral dialogues with many countries as part of harmonizing the U.S. Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) with international standards and regulations. Currently, our main country partnerships are with Canada, China, and Mexico.

**Canada**

PHMSA and its Canadian counterpart, Transport Canada's Transport of Dangerous Goods Directorate meet regularly to discuss and share programmatic goals, increase collaboration, and ensure North American alignment to the extent possible.  

PHMSA also engages with Transport Canada through the United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC). The RCC aims to reduce or eliminate regulatory differences between the United States and Canada. Click here for the Transportation of Dangerous Goods. Click here for the official Canadian Regulations for the Transportation of Dangerous Goods.

**China**

The U.S.-China Transportation Forum (TF) serves as the principal forum for high-level multi-modal transportation discussions involving U.S. and China government and industry experts. Through the TF, officials work to develop mutually beneficial solutions to common transportation challenges. There are four policy dialogues:

1) Safety

2) Innovation

3) Infrastructure Planning, Financing and Maintenance

4) Disaster Preparedness and Response

PHMSA operates within the Safety Policy Dialogue. The 9th TF was held in April 2018 in Beijing, China. Click here for more information.

In addition to the TF, PHMSA maintains open lines of communication with Chinese counterparts through providing best practices and technical assistance.

**Mexico**

PHMSA routinely engages with its counterparts at the Secretariat of Communications and Transportation to ensure the safe transportation of hazardous materials across the southern border. Click here for the Official Mexican Standards (Normas Oficiales Mexicanas or NOMs).
### §649g. Retirement: retirement for years of service; selective early retirement

(a) Retirement for Years of Services.—Sections 633 through 636 of this title shall apply to the retirement of officers in competitive categories of officers designated for purposes of this subchapter.

(b) Selective Early Retirement.—Sections 638 and 638a of this title shall apply to the retirement of officers described in subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title V, §507(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1747.)
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Evaluation of DOT 3AL 6061-T6 Cylinders to Determine the Crack Initiation Site ...                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Evaluation of DOT 3AL 6061-T6 Cylinders to Determine the Crack Initiation Site (CIS) Which Were Detected in Cylinder's Neck Threads PDF                   

# Evaluation of DOT 3AL 6061-T6 Cylinders to Determine the Crack Initiation Site (CIS) Which Were Detected in Cylinder's Neck Threads

This research project is a part of Failure Investigation and Metallurgical Analysis of DOT 3AL cylinders that were rejected during requalification due to internal neck-cracks. The main purpose of this research was to analyze the cylinder heads in order to determine the crack initiation site (CIS), crack type, the extent of crack propagation and the common cause of this type of cracks. The results of this research and fatigue analysis have been used to assess root-cause of neck-cracks and determination of safe usage of other DOT 3AL cylinders of the same lot in transportation.

This research project has been initiated and managed by DOT/Hazardous Materials Technology. For technical question, contact Mr. Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545
# C_2006331EN.01001301.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)) — Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas v ZVK Zuchtvieh-Kontor GmbH

(Case C-300/05) (1)

1

(Directive 91/628/EEC - Protection of animals during transport - Watering and feeding intervals, journey times and resting periods - Definition of ‘travel’ (‘Transportdauer’) - Account to be taken of the time taken to load and unload the animals)

(2006/C 331/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Applicant:

Defendant: ZVK Zuchtvieh-Kontor GmbH

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of the Annex (Chapter VII, point 48(4)(d)) to Council Directive 91/628/EEC of 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEC (OJ 1991 L 340, p. 17), as amended by Council Directive 95/29/EC of 29 June 1995 (OJ 1995 L 148, p. 52) — Watering and feeding intervals, journey times and resting periods — Meaning of ‘travel’ (‘Transportdauer’) — Inclusion of the loading time of the animals

Operative part of the judgment

‘Travel’, referred to in point 48(4)(d) of the Annex to Council Directive 91/628/EEC of 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEC, as amended by Council Directive 95/29/EC of 29 June 1995, is to be interpreted as including the time taken to load and unload the animals.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 1.10.2005.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K/Amendment No. 2 for the year ended January 31, 2014 of Gawk, Inc. (“the Company”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his respective knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: January 5, 2015 | /s/ Scott Kettle                                               
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Scott Kettle                                                   
|                      | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and 
Chief Financial Officer
|                      | (Principal Executive Officer)
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The register.**
 
SuDoc Number: Y3.SE 4:27/
Item Number:1079-B (MF)
CGP systemNumber: 000568553
 
1998-2004 (Zip file) | 2005-2019 (Zip file)
 
February 28, 2018
#### Seaver *v.*Seaver.

[No. 12,338.

Filed July 1, 1925.]

1. *Appeal.—Any evidence will sustain a finding on*appeal.— Where there was any evidence to sustain the finding of the court, the judgment will not be reversed for want of sufficient evidence, p. 371.

2. New *Trial.—Motion for because of newly-discovered evidence must show diligence in discovering new*evidence.—A motion for a new trial for newly-discovered evidence is properly overruled when the motion fails to show diligence in discovering the new evidence, p. 371.

3. New *Trial.—Newly-discovered evidence which is merely cumulative does not warrant a new trial.—A.*motion for a new trial because of newly-discovered evidence which is merely cumulative is properly overruled, p. 371.

From Scott Circuit Court; *Frank E. Little,*Special Judge.

Action by George W. Seaver against Arthur F. Seaver. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*George V. Cain*and *B. M. Owens,*for appellant.

*Lawson N. Mace*and *Oscar B. Abel,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Action by appellee against appellant wherein appellee seeks to *recover*from appellant a balancé of $1,200 of the purchase money of a certain tract of real estate. It is appellant’s contention, as appears by his affirmative answer, that said balance of $1,200 of the purchase price of such real estate was, by agreement of appellant and appellee, to be paid by him in the discharge of a certain mortgage upon another tract *371of real estate owned by the appellee instead of paying the same in cash.

There was a trial by the court and a judgment in favor of the appellee. The only error assigned is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, the reasons properly assigned being that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence, that it is contrary to law, and that appellant has newly-discovered evidence in the event of another trial.

1. While the evidence was conflicting, there was evidence that appellant agreed to pay the said sum of $1,200 in cash and this was sufficient to sustain the finding and judgment of the court in favor of the appellee.

2,3. As to the newly-discovered evidence, appellant wholly fails to show due diligence in discovering the new evidence, and such evidence was merely cumulative.

Judgment affirmed.