alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §783. Additional powers of trustee

(a) Distribution of Property Not of the Estate.—The trustee under this subchapter has power to distribute property not of the estate, including distributions to customers that are mandated by subchapters III and IV of this chapter.

(b) Disposition of Institution.—The trustee under this subchapter may, after notice and a hearing—

(1) sell the clearing bank to a depository institution or consortium of depository institutions (which consortium may agree on the allocation of the clearing bank among the consortium);

(2) merge the clearing bank with a depository institution;

(3) transfer contracts to the same extent as could a receiver for a depository institution under paragraphs (9) and (10) of section 11(e) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act;

(4) transfer assets or liabilities to a depository institution; and

(5) transfer assets and liabilities to a bridge depository institution as provided in paragraphs (1), (3)(A), (5), and (6) of section 11(n) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, paragraphs (9) through (13) of such section, and subparagraphs (A) through (H) and subparagraph (K) of paragraph (4) of such section 11(n), except that—

(A) the bridge depository institution to which such assets or liabilities are transferred shall be treated as a clearing bank for the purpose of this subsection; and

(B) any references in any such provision of law to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall be construed to be references to the appointing agency and that references to deposit insurance shall be omitted.

(c) Certain Transfers Included.—Any reference in this section to transfers of liabilities includes a ratable transfer of liabilities within a priority class.

(Added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(5) [title I, §112(c)(5)(B)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–395; amended Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title VI, §1604(b)(3), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2829.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 11 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), (5), is classified to section 1821 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 110–289, which directed amendment of this section by substituting "bridge depository institution" for "bridge bank", was executed by making the substitution in introductory provisions and subpar. (A) of subsec. (b)(5), to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 19

- 00695

- CV

James W. VOLBERDING , as Receiver for Charles Locas c io , Manuel Zamora , Jr. and Amelia Z amora , Appellants

v. Christopher John LOCASCIO , Matthew Locascio, Remy Locascio, Sarah Locascio, and Charles Locas c io, Appellees From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 03958 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2020
VACATED AND REMANDED On February 23, 2020, appellant James W. Volberding filed “Receiver’s Agreed Motion to Dismiss and to Vacate Judgment

. ” The agreed m otion, which is signed by counsel for all of the parties, states that the parties have s ettled the underlying dispute

. The motion request s that the trial court’s judgment be vacated and that a “final appellate judgment and mandate” be rendered

. The motio n is granted. However, because the parties did not provide us with the specific judgment to be rendered, we must remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment. Accordingly,04

- 19

- 00695

- CV

- 2

- t he “Agreed Final J udgment ” of the trial court signed on August 1 5, 2019 is set aside without regard to the merits and the cause is remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ mediated settlement agreement. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).
PER CURIAM
§ 81.5 What informal review is available to a tribe or petitioner when anticipating adopting or amending a governing document? A tribe that plans to adopt or amend a governing document or a spokesperson for a petitioner may, but is not required to, submit the proposed document with a request for informal review to the Local Bureau Official. ( a ) During the informal review: ( 1 ) Bureau personnel will help the tribal government or petitioner spokesperson in drafting governing documents, bylaws, charters, amendments and revocations, explain the Secretarial election process, and provide guidance on methods for voter education, such as informational meetings.
( 2 ) The Local Bureau Official will review the proposed document and will offer technical assistance and comments to the tribe or petitioner spokesperson, including but not limited to guidance on whether any of the provisions of the proposed document or amendment may be contrary to applicable laws.
( b ) The Bureau will provide technical assistance for a petition only upon request of the spokesperson. Bureau personnel will provide a courtesy copy to the tribe's governing body of all correspondence regarding technical assistance to the petitioners. The spokesperson will be responsible for obtaining the approval of the tribal members it represents on changes to the content of the petition.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 1644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-434]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

National Science Board

    The National Science Board's Task Force on Merit Review, pursuant 
to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation 
Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine 
Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
a meeting held by teleconference for the transaction of National 
Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

DATE AND TIME: January 19, 2011, 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. EST.

SUBJECT MATTER: Chairman's remarks and a discussion of Section 526 of 
the FY10 America Competes Reauthorization Act (Broader Impacts Review 
Criterion).

STATUS: Open.

LOCATION: This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National 
Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230. A room will be available for the public to listen-
in to this meeting held by teleconference. All visitors must contact 
the Board Office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting held by 
teleconference to arrange for a visitor's badge and to obtain the room 
number. Call 703-292-7000 or send an e-mail message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84eae5f0edebeae5e8f7e7ede1eae7e1e6f6e0c4eaf7e2aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc929d889593929d908f9f9599929f999e8e98bc928f9ad29b938a">[email protected]</span></a> with your name and organizational 
affiliation to request the room number and your badge, which will be 
ready for pick-up at the visitor's desk the day of the meeting. All 
visitors must report to the NSF visitor desk located in the lobby at 
the 9th and N. Stuart Streets entrance to receive your visitor's badge 
on the day of the teleconference.

UPDATES & POINT OF CONTACT: Please refer to the National Science Board 
Web site http://www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional information and schedule 
updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found 
at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Kim Silverman, National Science Board Office, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.

Daniel A. Lauretano,
Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-434 Filed 1-7-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Chris Hall, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Gawk Incorporated for the period ended January 31, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gawk Incorporated                                                            





|Dated: October 24, 2017 |  | /s/ Chris Hall                                                                                      |  | 
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                        |  | Chris Hall                                                                                         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                        |  | Gawk Incorporated                                                                                  



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Gawk Incorporated and will be retained by Gawk Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,964
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    120,025
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,593
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,573
<LOANS>                                        164,951
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,002
<DEPOSITS>                                     219,749
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,757
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 307,002
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,560
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,242
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    19
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,821
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,526
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,505
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,316
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  46
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    608
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         608
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       378
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.41
<LOANS-NON>                                        415
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   288
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,349
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       70
<RECOVERIES>                                        31
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,400
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,120
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            280


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

CARLOS HERRERA-RIVERA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50450 

D.C. No. 

3:14-cr-00653-BEN-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2018**

Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, PARKER,*** and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Herrera-Rivera appeals his conviction for possession of 

methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Barrington D. Parker, Jr., United States Circuit Judge 

for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.

FILED

NOV 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

This Court previously affirmed his conviction in United States v. HerreraRivera, 832 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2016). Although the Court affirmed his conviction, 

it remanded to the district court for resentencing. Id. at 1174-75. The district court 

resentenced Herrera-Rivera, and he now appeals again.

On appeal, he does not challenge his new sentence. Rather, he argues that, 

under the Court’s decision in United States v. Orozco, 858 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 

2017), the search and seizure leading to his arrest violated his Fourth Amendment 

rights, requiring suppression of the evidence introduced at trial and the reversal of 

his conviction. 

Herrera-Rivera failed to raise a Fourth Amendment claim at any point in the 

prior proceedings, and he is not entitled to do so now on his second appeal. Nor is 

he entitled to an evidentiary hearing. 

Our decision in Orozco is not the type of intervening authority that would 

allow Herrera-Rivera to raise his Fourth Amendment claim for the first time on his 

second appeal. See United States v. Van Alstyne, 584 F.3d 803, 812-13 (9th Cir. 

2009) (allowing defendant to re-raise issue in second appeal where he actually 

raised a related issue in a previous appeal). Orozco may well have provided 

Herrera-Rivera with a stronger basis to argue for suppression, but it cannot excuse 

his failure to raise a Fourth Amendment claim altogether in prior proceedings. 

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.17 Can the statutory 90-day period be extended?

Yes, with written consent of the Indian tribe or tribal organization. If consent is not given, the 90-day deadline applies.
### BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic Conferences of the International Air Transport Association OST-2012- 

## 001/

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS BY THE INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION
lATA AGREEMENTAPPROVED & IMMUNIZED DOCKETOST- 

## f

## Z

- 12£1 7/ ACTION

## DATE~**(~** 2-ot-z_._ This approval and grant ofantitrust immunity is subject, where applic-able, to conditions previously imposed. This action iS effective after 7days unless apetition is filed under 14 CFR 385.30 or areview is undertaken on the Department's own motion. Inv,iew ofthe agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of the above ocedure, th 1-d Q 'odin 14 CFR 303.42 is waived.



### Douglas E. Lavin Regional Vice President...,... North America International Air Transport Association 1776 K.St. N.W. #12th Floor Washington DC 20006
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ALAN THOMAS, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-3132

LT Case No. 2020-CF-003604-A-O

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed November 29, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Orange County, 

Tarlika Teresa Nunez-Navarro, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and 

George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

SASSO, NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary W. Douglass, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added
by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                    
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 8, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Gary W. Douglass                                               
|                  |  |  |  | Name: Gary W. Douglass Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer
U.S. EPA FACT SHEET



### H AWAII REGIONAL HAZE

– PROPOSED FEDERAL IMP LEMENTATION

PLAN

May 14, 2012

Today’s Action:

EPA is proposing a plan to address the requirements for reducing regional haze and improving visibility at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park on the Big Island, and Haleakala National Park on

Maui.

The plan proposes a cap on pollution from the Kanoelehua Hil l Generating Station, Shipman Power Plant and the Puna Power Plant on the Big Island. It is likely that the cap could be met through energy conservation and increased reliance on renewable energy already planned as part of Hawaii’s Clean Energy Initiative.

EPA is accepting public comments on this proposal for 30 days following publication in the Federal Register. We are also holding informational open houses and public hearings (see details below).

EPA’s plan is designed to achieve the following:

R easonab le progress toward achieving visibility goals at the Volcanoes National Park and

Haleakala National Park in the firs t planning period through 2018

A determination of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for the Kanoelehua Hill

Gener ating Station on th e Big Island

Background:

Regional Haze is visibility impairment caused by fine particle pollution. This haze obscures the view of scenery and objects at a distance, reducing the beauty of our protected natural areas.

Congress set the goal of the “pre vention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I Federal areas which impairment results from manmade air pollution.” These Class I areas in the U.S. include 156 national parks and national wilderness areas.
Under EPA’s Regional Haze Rule, the states are required to establish long

- term strategies for making reasonable progress toward achieving natural visibility in Class 1 areas.

Additional Information and Opportunities for Public Comment:

EPA is hol ding informational open houses and public hearings at the following times and locations:

Date: May 31, 2012 Time: Open House: 5:30

- 6:30 pm Public Hearing 6:30

- 8:30 pm Location: The University of Hawaii, Maui College in the Pilina Multipurpose Room

310 W. Kaahumanu Avenue Kahului, Hawaii 96732

Date: June 1, 2012 Time: Open House: 4:30

- 5:30 pm Public Hearing: 5:30

- 7:30 pm2

Location: Waiakea H igh School in the Cafeteria

155 W. Kawili Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720

Instructions for submitting comments on EPA’s proposal during the public comment period can

be found at http://www.regulations.gov and Docket ID No. EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2012

- 0345.

For more information, visit http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/actions/hawaii.html
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.240 What does retrocession mean?

A retrocession means the return to the Secretary of a contracted program, in whole or in part, for any reason, before the expiration of the term of the contract.