alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ramsey K. Hamadi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                               
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Date: February 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Ramsey K. Hamadi          
|                       |  |  |  | Name: Ramsey K. Hamadi        
|                       |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.6



|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                          
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 9062 Old Annapolis
Road Columbia, Maryland 21045

Citibank N.A.

17g-5 Information
Provider

ratingagencynotice@citi.com

RE: Annual Statement
as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), as Securities
Administrator and Paying Agent1, hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period):

(a) a review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement
listed on Schedule A hereto (the Servicing Agreement) has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period, except as described on Schedule B hereto.

February 27, 2014



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
|Kristen Ann Cronin    
|Vice President        
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



|1 | Effective January 1, 2014, Wells Fargo resigned as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent, and Citibank N.A. was appointed as successor Securities Administrator and successor Paying Agent. See the Form 8-K filed
on January 6, 2014 for additional information.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                       |  |  |  |     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |  |  | LOGO



---

Schedule A

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012, for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-2, by and among Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc., as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.2



|2 | The Pooling and Servicing Agreement was amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 to reflect the resignation of Wells Fargo as the Securities Administrator and Paying Agent (among other roles). See the Form
8-K filed on January 6, 2014 for additional information.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2



---

Schedule B

None



3
Flight Checklist

LED

Motors inactive, safe to 

handle

Low battery, automatic landing

Loss of RC signal, automatic landing

Pre-arm safety check failure

Loss of GPS signal, switch to manual

Initializing, hold the X8 level

Acquiring GPS, please wait

Autopilot ready, GPS locked

Armed

Safety Button

Motors active, deactivate before 

handling (see reverse)

Flight Modes

Return to launch

RTL

land at the launch point

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Standard position 

(altitude hold mode)

STD

fly manually

Loiter mode

LTR

hover

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Return to Launch

!

Stand back!

4 6

The motors are 

now active.

Hold left stick downright until motors spin.

1 2 Power on controller;

set to STD and RTL OFF.

Arm 

motors.

Press and hold safety 

button until solid red.

Connect

charged battery.

Choose a clear launch 

point, and face the X8 

away from you. 

5 Check 3 LED.

Place the X8 at 

launch point.

Go outside to 

an open area!

See the Operation 

Manual for complete 

instructions.

Auto mode

AUTO

fly a mission

©2014 3D Robotics. vB. DCT0005 All rights reserved.

Control gimbal

TILT

tilt the camera down and up

Land

CH7

land at the current position

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

X8+

Hold the X8 still 

and level while 

powering on.
Press and hold until 

blinking red to deactivate.

Hold left stick downleft until motors stop. 

1 2 Disarm 

motors.

Press safety 

button. 3 Disconnect battery. 4Power off 

controller. Postflight

Controller Flight Data

Press and hold the DN button to access the flight data screens. 

Press DN again to toggle between screens.

Lower left stick below 

center to descend.

Set left stick fully down to 

land when near the ground.

Left Stick

Left Stick

Raise left stick above 

center to take off and 

gain altitude.

Move left stick left 

and right to rotate.

Use right stick to fly forward, 

backward, left, and right.

Set left stick to center 

to maintain altitude.

Left Stick

Left Stick

Flight

current flight mode

controller battery level (9-12 V)

GPS signal strength in # of 

satellites

meters from launch point

flight battery level (14-16.8 V)

connection strength

current latitude

current longitude

altitude in meters

flight time

altitude in meters

For customer support, contact us at help@3dr.com

or call our support line at +1 (858) 225-1414 

Monday through Friday, from 8 am to 5 pm, PST.

3DR.com/X8/info 

GPS status

speed in m/s

flight battery mAh 

consumed since armed

End your flight at 14.1 V.

Do not exceed 8,000 mAh for 

a fully charged X8+ battery 

(80% of available capacity).

!
### [§12551. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title V, §515(a), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2539]

Section, added Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §515(a), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1732, related to prohibition of use of Air Force Reserve AGR personnel for Air Force base security functions.
from those raised in his previous petitions. 3See NRS 34.810(1)(b)(2); NRS

34.810(2). Appellant's petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3). Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, appellant was required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice. NRS 34.800(2). Based upon our review of the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition as procedurally barred for the reasons discussed below.

In an attempt to overcome the procedural bars, appellant claimed that he had new evidence, not presented to the jury, that demonstrated that he was actually innocent. Appellant claimed, based on an article in the Las Vegas Review Journal, that the DNA evidence used at his trial may have been tainted because a DNA technician made an error in another case. Appellant did not demonstrate actual innocence because he failed to show that "it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have convicted him in light of. . . new evidence." Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 559 (1998) (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327 (1995)); see also Pellegrini v. State, 117 Nev. 860, 887, 34 P.3d 519, 537 (2001); Mazzan v. Warden, 112 Nev. 838, 842, 921 P.2d 920, 922 (1996). Appellant also claimed that he was actually innocent because a witness recanted his testimony. This court has previously rejected this

3 Singer v State, Docket No. 23916 (Order Dismissing Appeal, July 28, 1995); Singer v. State, Docket Nos. 29029, 29547, 29910 (Order Dismissing Appeals and Denying Petition for Rehearing or Clarification, February 24, 1998); Singer v. State, Docket No. 38561 (Order of Affirmance, June 27, 2002); Singer v. State, Docket No. 47725 (Order of Affirmance, December 21, 2006).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 02 1

4:7_ 2claim, Singer v State, Docket No. 23916 (Order Dismissing Appeal, July

28, 1995); Singer v. State, Docket Nos. 29029, 29547, 29910 (Order Dismissing Appeals and Denying Petition for Rehearing or Clarification, February 24, 1998); Singer v. State, Docket No. 38561 (Order of Affirmance, June 27, 2002), and further litigation of this claim is barred by the doctrine of law of the case. Hall v. State, 91 Nev. 314, 315-16, 535 P.2d 797, 798-99 (1975). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's petition as procedurally barred, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 4

J. Hardesty

cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Maury A. Singer Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

4We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

3
#### STATE v. HOPE

No. 12P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 498

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
# C_2006237EN.01000801.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/8

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 June 2006 — Kingdom of Denmark v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-5/06) (1)

1

(Declining of jurisdiction)

(2006/C 237/14)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Molde, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and H Støvlbaek, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2005/717/EC of 13 October 2005 amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (OJ 2005 L 271, p. 48).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The Court of First Instance declines jurisdiction in Case T-5/06 Denmark v Commission so that the Court of Justice may rule on the request for annulment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Court of First Instance declines jurisdiction in Case T-5/06 Denmark v Commission so that the Court of Justice may rule on the request for annulment.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.3.2006.

1

---
§ 213.14 Corporations and corporate information. If the applicant for a lease is a corporation, it shall file evidence of authority of its officers to execute papers; and with its first application it shall also file a certified copy of its articles of incorporation, and, if foreign to the State in which the lands are located, evidence showing compliance with the corporation laws thereof. Statements of changes in officers and stockholders shall be furnished by a corporation lessee to the Area Director January 1 of each year, and at such other times as may be requested. Whenever deemed advisable in any case the Area Director may require a corporation applicant or lessee to file: ( a ) List of officers, principal stockholders, and directors, with post office addresses and numbers of shares held by each.
( b ) A sworn statement of the proper officer showing: ( 1 ) The total number of shares of the capital stock actually issued and the amount of cash paid into the treasury on each share sold; or, if paid in property, the kind of quantity and value of the same paid per share.
( 2 ) Of the stock sold, how much remains unpaid and subject to assessment.
( 3 ) The amount of cash the company has in its treasury and elsewhere.
( 4 ) The property, exclusive of cash, owned by the company and its value.
( 5 ) The total indebtedness of the company and the nature of its obligations.
( 6 ) Whether the applicant or any person controlling, controlled by or under common control with the applicant has filed any registration statement, application for registration, prospectus or offering sheet with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or said Commission's rules and regulations under said acts; if so, under what provision of said acts or rules and regulations; and what disposition of any such statement, application, prospectus or offering sheet has been made.
( c ) Affidavits of individual stockholders, setting forth in what corporations, or with what persons, firms, or associations such individual stockholders are interested in mining leases on restricted lands within the State, and whether they hold such interest for themselves or in trust.

Cross Reference:
For regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, see 17 CFR chapter II.
### §§1422a, 1422b. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title II, §1204(1), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2785

Section 1422a, act July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §2A, as added Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §702(a), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 413; amended Pub. L. 102–550, title XIII, §1391, title XVI, §1608, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4009, 4089, established the Federal Housing Finance Board.

Section 1422b, act July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §2B, as added Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §702(a), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 414; amended Pub. L. 106–102, title VI, §606(e)(1), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1454, related to powers and duties of the Federal Housing Finance Board.
SERVED MARCH 19, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION : y / :-.J'-P M 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS y M-iU;. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EMPIRE AIRWAYS, 

Respondent 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0002 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0191 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO FILE ANSWER OR MOTION 

ADDRESSED TO COMPLAINT 

The Respondent has filed a motion seeking an extension of the 

deadline for filing its answer to the complaint or motion addressed to the 

sufficiency of the complaint. The motion papers represent that the 

Complainant has no objection to the relief requested therein. 

For good cause, the motion is granted, and the deadline for the 

Respondent to file its answer or a motion addressed to the sufficiency of the 

complaint is extended to March 25, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

IsaatTD. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP10EA0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Charles J. Casolaro, Respondent's Counsel 

Casolaro Sussman, LLP 

1050 Franklin Avenue, Suite 402 

Garden City, NY 11530 

TEL: 516-248-1399 

FAX: 516-248-2257 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 . 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-0437 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^SO.
#### § 171.130 Who can I contact if I have any questions about these regulations or my irrigation service?

Contact the local irrigation project where you receive service or want to apply for service. If your questions are not addressed to your satisfaction at the local project level, you may contact the appropriate BIA Regional Office.
§ 30.107 How will the Secretary include students with disabilities in assessments? ( a ) The BIE and BIE-funded schools must ensure that students with disabilities have the appropriate accommodations, such as interoperability with, and ability to use, assistive technology, for students with disabilities, including students with the most significant cognitive disabilities, necessary to measure the academic achievement of such children relative to the BIE's challenging academic standards or alternate academic achievement standards described in § 30.104(d) and (e).
( b ) The Secretary must include students with disabilities in all assessments, with appropriate accommodations. For purposes of this section, students with disabilities, collectively, are: ( 1 ) All children with disabilities as defined under section 602(3) of the IDEA;
( 2 ) Students with the most significant cognitive disabilities who are identified from among the students in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 3 ) Students with disabilities covered under other acts, including: ( i ) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; and
( ii ) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as amended.
( c ) Appropriate accommodations for those students described in paragraph (b) of this section will be determined by: ( 1 ) For each student under paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section, the student's IEP team;
( 2 ) For each student under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, the student's placement team; or
( 3 ) For each student under paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section, the individual or team designated by the school to make these decisions.
( d ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, a student with a disability must be assessed with an assessment aligned with the BIE's challenging academic standards for the grade in which the student is enrolled.
( 2 ) A student with the most significant cognitive disabilities may be assessed with: ( i ) The general assessment under § 30.106(b); or
( ii ) The alternate assessment under § 30.108 aligned with the BIE's challenging academic content standards for the grade in which the student is enrolled and the BIE's alternate academic achievement standards.
( e ) The BIE and school must ensure that general and special education teachers, paraprofessionals, teachers of English learners, specialized instructional support personnel, and other appropriate staff receive necessary training to administer assessments and know how to administer assessments, including, as necessary, alternate assessments, and know how to make use of appropriate accommodations during assessment for all students with disabilities, consistent with section 1111(b)(2)(B)(vii)(III) of the Act.
( f ) The BIE and school must ensure that the use of appropriate accommodations under paragraph (c) of this section does not deny a student with a disability: ( 1 ) The opportunity to participate in the assessment; and
( 2 ) Any of the benefits from participation in the assessment that are afforded to students without disabilities.
## CENRAP BART MODELING GUIDELINES

12 km Terrain Field (m) 6 km CALMET Wind Field

Three CALMET Modeling Domains

Prepared by

T. W. Tesche Dennis E. McNally George J. Schewe Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ft. Wright, KY 41017 Prepared for

Ms. Annette Sharp

Executive Director Central Region Air Planning Assoc. 10005 S. Pennsylvania, Ste C

Oklahoma City, OK 73159

15 December 2005

www.alpinegeophysics.com
EXHIBIT 31.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Joachim Hensel, certify that:




1.              I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2012-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2.              Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.              Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4.              I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5.              All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.




Dated: March 20, 2013




By:   /s/ Joachim Hensel


Name: Joachim Hensel


Title:   Vice President – Finance & CFO


BMW Financial Services NA, LLC