alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.189 Does this coverage extend to subcontractors of self-determination contracts?

No. Subcontractors or subgrantees providing services to a Public Law 93-638 contractor or grantee are generally not covered. The only exceptions are Indian contractors such as those under subcontract with the California Rural Indian Health Board to carry out IHS programs in geographically defined service areas in California and personal services contracts under § 900.193 (for § 900.183(b)(1)) or § 900.183(b) (for § 900.190).
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

123) IV-C-89 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:57AM Sheet 123 of 232 
- ^ e 0 ST4rfi 

^M0 4 | UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

\ -*V\'/~J WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

\m*f MAR I 1988 % 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Bill Grant 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D. C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Grant: 

Thank you for taking the time to send us the comments 

of your constituent, Joseph Capitano, on EPA's proposed 

actions to control vapors generated during the refueling 

of motor vehicles and to lower the volatility of gasoline. 

A copy of his letter will be placed in the public dockets 

for these rulemakings. 

On July 22, 1987, Mr. Lee Thomas, Administrator of EPA, 

held a press conference to announce these two major proposals. 

The proposals were subsequently published in the Federal 

Register and made available to the public along with extensive* 

documentation of supporting analyses. We have enclosed the 

press release and fact sheets prepared for the July announcement 

which explain the details of our proposals as well as general 

information on air pollution reduction potential, costs, and 

the relative advantages and disadvantages of the control options 

(i.e., onboard versus Stage II). I believe this information 

will be useful in preparing your response to your constituents. 

As you would expect, both of these proposals are very 

complex and controversial. We held public hearings in October 

1987 and have since received many written comments from interested 

parties. We are currently in the process of reviewing these 

comments and revising our analyses in light of the information 

presented. 

Once again, thank you for sharing the views of your 

constituent on these matters. They will be considered as we 

proceed with the next phase of the rulemaking. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

RICHARD D. V/:LSO N 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

Enclosures 

cc: Docket A-87-11 

Docket A-85-21 
P.3 

^\fi%Q^S.7 

MAR 

2^7**0*0* 

2 2

 1938 

•*> . _ 

**v U,y;fi,f, r-y/f
10.1 

 11/08/04 

Page 1 

Quitting Tobacco: Handling Cravings ... Without Smoking 

Nicotine and Your Body and Mind 

• As a smoker, you are used to having a certain level of nicotine in your body. You control 

that level by how much you smoke, how deeply you inhale the smoke, and by the kind of 

tobacco you use. When you quit, cravings develop when the body wants more nicotine.

• When you are exposed to smoking triggers or even when you use a small amount of 

nicotine, your mood changes, and cravings for tobacco can go up as well as your heart 

rate and blood pressure. Cravings are NOT “just in your head.”

What To Expect 

• Cravings usually begin within an hour or two after you stop smoking, peak for several 

days, and may last several weeks.

• The urge to smoke will come and go. Your cravings will be strongest in the first week 

after you quit using tobacco. Cravings usually last only a very brief period of time.

• You may also experience cravings that follow each other in rapid succession. As the 

days pass, the cravings will get farther apart. There is some evidence that mild 

occasional cravings may last for 6 months.

What To Do 

• Remind yourself that cravings will pass.

• As a substitute for smoking, try chewing on carrots, pickles, sunflower seeds, apples, 

celery, or sugarless gum or hard candy. Keeping your mouth busy may stop the 

psychological need to smoke. 

• Try this exercise: Take a deep breath through your nose and blow out slowly through 

your mouth. Repeat 10 times.

• Avoid situations and activities (like drinking alcohol) that you normally associate with 

smoking. 

Related Notes 

• Nicotine cravings may be reduced by using nicotine replacement products, which deliver 

small, steady doses of nicotine into the body. Nicotine replacement patches, gum, 

lozenges, nasal spray, and inhaler appear to be equally effective. Buproprion pills (which 

don’t contain nicotine) also help relieve withdrawal symptoms. 
10.1 

 11/08/04 

Page 2 

How To Get Help 

• If you or someone you know wants help with giving up tobacco, please call the National 

Cancer Institute’s Smoking Quitline toll-free at 1–877–44U–QUIT (1–877–448–7848). 

The information specialists on the Quitline can provide suggestions and support to help 

smokers break the habit.

• The Federal Government’s Smokefree.gov Web site (http://www.smokefree.gov) allows 

you to choose the help that best fits your needs. You can get immediate assistance: 

o View an online step-by-step cessation guide. 

o Find state quitline telephone numbers. 

o Instant message an expert through NCI’s LiveHelp service. 

o Download, print, or order publications about quitting smoking. 

# # # 

This fact sheet was reviewed on 11/08/04

This fact sheet was adapted from material developed by the Tobacco Education and Prevention Program of the 

Arizona Department of Health Services and the Arizona Smokers’ Helpline of the University of Arizona.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 105

To deauthorize certain portions of the project for navigation, Bass Harbor,

Maine.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To deauthorize certain portions of the project for navigation,

Bass Harbor, Maine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BASS HARBOR, MAINE.

4 (a) DEAUTHORIZATION.—The portions of the project

5 for navigation, Bass Harbor, Maine, authorized on May

6 7, 1962, under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act

7 of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), that are described in subsection

8 (b) are not authorized after the date of enactment of this

9 Act.
2

•S 105 IS

1 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The portions of the project re2 ferred to in subsection (a) are described as follows:

3 (1) Beginning at a bend in the project,

4 N149040.00, E538505.00, thence running easterly

5 about 50.00 feet along the northern limit of the

6 project to a point N149061.55, E538550.11, thence

7 running southerly about 642.08 feet to a point,

8 N148477.64, E538817.18, thence running south9 westerly about 156.27 feet to a point on the westerly

10 limit of the project, N148348.50, E538737.02,

11 thence running northerly about 149.00 feet along

12 the westerly limit of the project to a bend in the

13 project, N148489.22, E538768.09, thence running

14 northwesterly about 610.39 feet along the westerly

15 limit of the project to the point of origin.

16 (2) Beginning at a point on the westerly limit

17 of the project, N148118.55, E538689.05, thence

18 running southeasterly about 91.92 feet to a point,

19 N148041.43, E538739.07, thence running southerly

20 about 65.00 feet to a point, N147977.86,

21 E538725.51, thence running southwesterly about

22 91.92 feet to a point on the westerly limit of the

23 project, N147927.84, E538648.39, thence running
3

•S 105 IS

1 northerly about 195.00 feet along the westerly limit

2 of the project to the point of origin.

Æ
### [§1744. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VIII, §834(b), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1551]

Section, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XII, §1202(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1652; amended Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VIII, §812(f), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2451; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VIII, §832(c), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1550, related to scholarship program.
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated March 4, 2014, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated March 4, 2014, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2014-1US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Karleen Munns, am a Director of Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited (the Servicer).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the period from April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been
made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: 26 June 2017           
|                             
|/s/ Karleen Munns            
|Karleen Munns Director       
|                             
|Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited
Order entered November 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00408-CV

DAVID AND LYDIA MAIN, Appellant

V.

GILBERT ESPINOSA DBA ESPINOSA TRUCKING, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-08276

ORDER

The reporter’s record is past due. Because appellants indicated on their 

docketing statement filed with this Court that they did not request the record, we 

ORDER the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. Appellants shall 

file their brief on the merits within thirty days of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Sheretta 

Martin, Official Court Reporter of the 162nd Judicial District Court, and all parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
# C_2006190EN.01003401.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/34

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2006 — Ott and Others v Commission

(Case F-87/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Promotion for 2004 - Non-inclusion on the list of officials promoted - Article 111 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance - Action, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded )

(2006/C 190/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Martial Ott (Oberanven, Luxembourg), Fernando Lopez Tola (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Francis Weiler (Itzig, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and D. Martin, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the decision of 30 November 2004, published in Administrative Notice No 130 2004 of 30 November 2004, in which the Commission of the European Communities set out the list of officials promoted in 2004, since that list does not include the names of the applicants, and, secondly, in the alternative, annulment of the allocation of promotion points for 2004.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed, in part, as manifestly inadmissible and, in part, as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed, in part, as manifestly inadmissible and, in part, as manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Each of the parties shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each of the parties shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315 of 10.12.2005 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-349/05 and transferred to the European Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
#### Jeremiah O’Day, Plaintiff in Error, *v.*The People of the State of New York, Defendants in Error.

(Argued February 21, *1877;*

decided March 20, *1877.)*

*William B. Donihee,*for plaintiff in error.

*607
      *Daniel N. Lockwood,*for defendants in error.

Agree to affirm. No opinion. Allen, Rapallo and Miller, JJ., not voting.

J udgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLES956000-L14200000-BJ0000-LXSITRST0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Michigan.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States office in Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bureau of Land Management-Eastern States, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153.                         *Attn:*                         Cadastral Survey.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The lands surveyed are:

## Michigan Meridian, Michigan

T. 15 N., R 5 W.

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion of the West boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, and the survey of the subdivision of Section 18, of Township 15 North, Range 5 West, of the Michigan Meridian, in the State of Michigan, and was accepted September 22, 2010.

We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information.

If BLM receives a protest against the survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest.

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals.

Dated: January 6, 2011.

Dominica Van Koten,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

[FR Doc. 2011-456 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service

Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank**(the "Servicer" ). 

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing com p liance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229 .1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations ( the "CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2( ii ), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions" ).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori Eshoo 

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 12, 2015
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4349 — Metro/Geant Polska )

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 193/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 442

Calling upon the President to take certain actions regarding imports of

steel products from certain countries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 15, 2000

Mr. TRAFICANT (for himself and Mr. NEY) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

RESOLUTION

Calling upon the President to take certain actions regarding

imports of steel products from certain countries.

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls

2 upon the President—

3 (1) to immediately review, during the 10-day

4 period beginning on the date of the adoption of this

5 resolution, the entry into the customs territory of

6 the United States of all steel products that are the

7 product or manufacture of Australia, China, South

8 Africa, Ukraine, Indonesia, India, Japan, Russia,

9 South Korea, or Brazil;
2

•HRES 442 IH

1 (2) if, after the 10-day period described in sub2 paragraph (A), the President finds that the Govern3 ment of Australia, China, South Africa, Ukraine, In4 donesia, India, Japan, Russia, South Korea, or

5 Brazil is not abiding by the spirit and letter of inter6 national trade agreements with respect to imports of

7 steel products into the United States, to immediately

8 impose a 1-year ban on the imports of all steel prod9 ucts that are the product or manufacture of the

10 country with respect to which the finding is made;

11 (3) to establish a task force within the executive

12 branch to closely monitor imports of steel products

13 into the United States from other countries to deter14 mine whether or not international trade agreements

15 are being violated; and

16 (4) not later than July 1, 2000, to report to the

17 Congress on any other actions the President has

18 taken, or intends to take, to ensure that all trading

19 partners of the United States abide by the spirit and

20 letter of international trade agreements with respect

21 to imports of steel products into the United States.

Æ
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Statement by National Security Advisory Jake Sullivan on the Republic of Korea’s Indo-Pacific Strategy

By U.S. Mission Korea 

U.S. Embassy & Consulate in the Republic of Korea -- The United States welcomes the Republic of Korea’s adoption of its new Indo-Pacific Strategy as a reflection of our shared commitment to the region’s security and growing prosperity. The strategy sets forth a comprehensive approach that demonstrates the commitment of President Yoon and the Korean people to upholding universal values such as the rule of law and human rights. The ROK’s goal to expand its cooperation with other allies and partners across the Indo-Pacific will strengthen our shared ability to advance international peace, security, and promote nuclear nonproliferation. The strategy will also enhance the region’s economic security networks, cooperation in science and technology, and engagement on climate change and energy security. We are grateful for President Yoon’s and the ROK’s leadership, and congratulate the people of the ROK on their new strategy, which will help the United States and our partners advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous Indo-Pacific.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More