alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### [§1413. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VI, §641(b), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1514]

Section, added Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title VI, §658(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 668; amended Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title VI, §657(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–166; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title VI, §641(b), (e)(1), (2), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1150, 1151; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VI, §636(b), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2576; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VI, §641(c)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1514, related to special compensation for certain severely disabled uniformed services retirees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 2004, and applicable to payments for months beginning on or after that date, see section 641(e) of Pub. L. 108–136, set out as an Effective Date of 2003 Amendment note under section 1414 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-07-2000
<CASH>                                          16,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,816)
<INVENTORY>                                    803,107
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               932,443
<PP&E>                                         585,464
<DEPRECIATION>                               (180,470)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,381,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          597,138
<BONDS>                                        567,744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           283
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,381,945
<SALES>                                      1,787,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,787,370
<CGS>                                        1,087,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,087,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               617,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,784
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,819
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,887
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,932
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,933
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,865
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 502.18 Person having management responsibility for a management contract.

*Person having management responsibility for a management contract* means the person designated by the management contract as having management responsibility for the gaming operation, or a portion thereof.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

USAF, ROKAF join forces for Herk Guardians 23October 20, 2023 — United States Air Force representatives from Yokota Air Base, Japan, met Republic of Korea Air Force counterparts at Gimhae Air Base, South Korea, for a week of tactical airlift training and cultural exchange as part of Herk Guardians 23, Oct. 9–13... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
-  Home 
-  Safety Awareness 
-  PERI 

# In This Section

                      -  Safety Awareness Overview 
                      -  Pipeline Leak Recognition and What to Do 
                      -  Excavation Enforcement Final Rule                          -  Overview 
                        -  Rule Language 
                        -  Determinations of Adequacy 
                        -  Frequently Asked Questions 
                      -  Pipeline Emergency Responders Initiative (PERI)                          -  Overview 
                        -  PERI FAQs 
                        -  Eastern Region 
                        -  Southern Region 
                        -  Central Region 
                        -  Southwest Region 
                        -  Western Region 
                      -  Safety Awareness Reports Search 
                      -  Historical Pipeline Incidents 
                      -  Pipeline Failure Investigation Reports 
                      -  Marine Damage Prevention 

## Pipeline Emergency Responders Initiative

U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# PERIs in PHMSA's Southwest Region

Interested in starting a PERI in your state and your state is not listed? Contact your state's Community Liaison to inquire about a PERI.
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 
-  Pipeline Technical Resources 
-  Gas Transmission Integrity Management (GT IM) 

# In This Section

                      -  Pipeline Technical Resources 
                      -  Gas Transmission Integrity Management (GT IM) Overview 
                      -  GT IM Fact Sheet 
                      -  GT IM Performance Measures 
                      -  GT IM Key Documents 
                      -  GT IM Meetings 
                      -  GT IM Notifications 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Gas Transmission Integrity Management FAQs                   

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Fax:**202-366-4566****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Gas Transmission Integrity Management (GT IM) Overview

This site provides information regarding the Gas Transmission Integrity Management Rule (68 FR 69778), commonly referred to as the "Gas IM Rule", or alternatively, the "GT IM Rule."

The GT IM Rule resulted in regulations (49 CFR Part 192, Subpart O) which specify how pipeline operators must identify, prioritize, assess, evaluate, repair and validate the integrity of gas transmission pipelines that could, in the event of a leak or failure, affect High Consequence Areas (HCAs) within the United States. These HCAs include certain populated and occupied areas. Operators were given until December 17, 2004 to write and implement their IM programs.

For an overview of the progress being made under the gas transmission pipeline integrity management (GT IM) regulations, please see the Performance Measures page. There you will find graphs and charts which depict progress and other aspects of operator implementation of the GT IM regulations. You will also find a link to the data provided by pipeline operators in accordance with these regulations.

Other GT IM menu links on the left provide additional information, including a fact sheet that summarizes key requirements of the GT IM regulations; details of the GT IM regulations; a glossary of related terminology; FAQs; and, other information useful in more fully understanding these regulations.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1119

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 2000

Referred to the Committee on Resources

AN ACT

To amend the Act of August 9, 1950, to continue funding

of the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1119 RFH

1 SECTION 1. FUNDING OF THE COASTAL WETLANDS PLAN2 NING, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION ACT.

3 Section 4(a) of the Act of August 9, 1950 (16 U.S.C.

4 777c(a)), is amended in the second sentence by striking

5 ‘‘1999’’ and inserting ‘‘2009’’.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
EXHIBIT 10.7
                                                             Bio-One Corporation
 ===============================================================================
               310 Waymont Court, Suite 100 o Lake Mary, FL 32746
                     o (407) 328-1611 o Fax (407) 328-1612

                    IRWIN NEWMAN CONSULTING AGREEMENT SUMMARY

OBJECTIVES

1)   RAISE CAPITAL
2)   BUILD REVENUES
3)   COUNSEL MANAGEMENT

COMPENSATION FORMULA

1)   RAISE CAPITAL
     A)   ROUND ONE (PRE-PUBLIC)
          o    10% ON THE CASH RAISED AND PAID IN CASH
          o    10% ON THE STOCK ISSUED AND PAID IN "144" STOCK
          o    THIS APPLIES TO ALL THOSE THAT CONSULTANT BRINGS IN
     B)   ROUND TWO (POST PUBLIC)
          o    7% ON THE FIRST $5 MILLION ON DIRECT CASH RAISED
          o    5% ON EVERYTHING ABOVE $5 MILLION ON DIRECT CASH RAISED
          o    20% OF THE FEE PAID TO THOSE  INTRODUCED BY CONSULTANT WITH A CAP
               ON TOTAL  FEES  PAID OF 8.4% ON THE  FIRST $5  MILLION  AND 6% ON
               EVERYTHING ABOVE $5 MILLION
          o    ALL FEES TO BE PAID IN "144" STOCK AND AT A 20% DISCOUNT FROM THE
               PREVIOUS 90 DAY DAILY TRADING AVERAGE

2)   BUILD REVENUES
     A)   FOR EACH $10  MILLION  IN ANNUAL  REVENUES  CONSULTANT  WOULD  RECEIVE
          100,000 SHARES OF "144" STOCK

3)   COUNSEL MANAGEMENT
     A)   $1,500 PER DAY
     B)   AN "HONOR SYSTEM" OF ACCOUNTING FOR HOURS
     C)   PAID  QUARTERLY IN "144" STOCK AND AT A 20% DISCOUNT FROM THE PREVIOUS
          90 DAY DAILY TRADING AVERAGE

NOTES:    1) This agreement is to cover the time span for the consultant to earn
one  million  shares  of "144"  stock.  Once  that has been  achieved,  then the
consultant and the Company would negotiate the future fee structure.
          2) Fees that have been accruing for services  rendered  since October,
2000 are to be included in this compensation formula.

Bio-One Corporation                           Consultant

/s/ Armand Dauplaise 1/17/01                  /s/Irwin Newman
----------------------------                  ----------------------------
Armand Dauplaise, President                   Irwin Newman, Consultant
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.107 What property to which an Indian tribe or tribal organization obtains title under this subpart is eligible for replacement funding?

Government-furnished property, contractor-purchased property and excess BIA and IHS property donated to an Indian tribe or tribal organization to which an Indian tribe or tribal organization holds title shall remain eligible for replacement funding to the same extent as if title to that property were held by the United States.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Saul 
Ewing LLP on behalf of Trinity Industries, Inc. (WB605-7-09/20/10) for 
permission to use certain data from the Board's 2009 Carload Waybill 
Sample. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of 
Economics.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330

Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011-450 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
-  Home 
-  Regulations 

# In This Section

                      -  PHMSA Rules 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 49 CFR Parts 100-199

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents here: https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The eCFR is also searchable by keyword and other available options on the eCFR website. To search and browse regulations using the eCFR website, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

Search the eCFR

# 

# Pagination

-  «« First 
-  ‹‹ Previous 
-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
- …
-  ›Next › 
-  »Last »
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 13, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-349

Lower Tribunal No. 02-15849

________________

B.P., The Father,

Appellant,

vs.

Department of Children and Families, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Angélica D. 

Zayas, Judge.

Cooke Law P.A., and Stewart M. Cooke, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, for appellee, Department of Children and Families; Sara 

Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria 

Glass, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division (Tallahassee), for appellee, 

Guardian ad Litem.

Before EMAS, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See D.P. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 930 So. 2d 

798, 801 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“The standard of review on a termination of 

parental rights case is ‘highly deferential.’ That is, ‘[a] finding that evidence 

is clear and convincing enjoys a presumption of correctness and will not be 

overturned on appeal unless clearly erroneous or lacking in evidentiary 

support’” (quoting N.L. v. Dept. of Children and Family Serv., 843 So. 2d 996, 

999 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)); J.V. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 326 So. 3d 

76, 78-79 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (noting that an appellate court will not review 

the evidence in a light most favorable to the parent, but in a neutral manner 

to assess whether the competent, substantial evidence supports the trial 

court’s conclusion; so long as the competent, substantial evidence supports 

the trial court’s ruling on one of the statutory grounds alleged as a basis for 

termination under section 39.806, Florida Statutes, a reviewing court will 

affirm that ruling). See also Lecorps v. Star Lakes Ass’n, Inc., 47 Fla. L. 

Weekly D1136 at *4 (Fla. 3d DCA May 25, 2022) (“It is axiomatic that the trial 

court retains inherent authority to reconsider any of its nonfinal rulings prior 

to entry of the final judgment or another order terminating the action”) (citing 

Silvestrone v. Edell, 721 So. 2d 1173, 1175 (Fla. 1998)); C.B. v. Dep’t of 

Children & Families, 257 So. 3d 1078, 1081 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (observing 

that “the circumstances surrounding the creation of the case plan may extend 
3

to problems identified subsequent to the children's removal, and not 

exclusively those identified contemporaneous to removal.”)
# C_2006326EN.01002002.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland

(Case C-152/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/95/EC - Hazardous substances - Electrical and electronic equipment - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 326/40)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and K. Nyberg, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: E. Bygglin, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to ensure the transposition within the prescribed period, with regard to the autonomous province of Åland, of Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (OJ 2003 L 37, p. 19)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by failing to adopt, with regard to the Åland Islands, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by failing to adopt, with regard to the Åland Islands, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.

1

---
#### § 273.161 What is the maximum decrease in funding allowed?

Beginning December 31, 2022 (4 years after the December 31, 2018, date of enactment of the JOM Modernization Act), no contracting party may receive for a fiscal year more than a 10 percent decrease in funding per eligible Indian student from the previous fiscal year.
§ 81.60 How does the Local Bureau Official process the petition? ( a ) The Local Bureau Official must, on the date of receipt, date stamp the petition to record the Official Filing Date, and make four copies of the petition for use as follows: ( 1 ) Posting at the local Bureau office for 30 days from the Official Filing Date, including a statement of the proposal contained in the petition and instructions for filing a challenge;
( 2 ) Use in determining sufficiency of petition; and
( 3 ) For viewing at the Local Bureau Office by a member of the tribe, 18 years of age or older.
( b ) The Local Bureau Official must, within one week of the Official Filing Date: ( 1 ) Provide the spokesperson written acknowledgment of receiving the petition, which contains the Official Filing Date, the exact number of signatures submitted on the petition, and the statement “The petitioners may not add or withdraw any signatures from the petition after the Official Filing Date”; and
( 2 ) Provide a copy of the written acknowledgment of receipt and petition to the recognized tribal governing body.
( c ) The Local Bureau Official must: ( 1 ) Consult with the Office of the Solicitor to determine if any of the provisions that are the subject of the petition are or may be contrary to applicable law; and
( 2 ) If it appears that a provision is or may be contrary to applicable law, notify the petitioner's spokesperson in writing (with a copy to the recognized tribal governing body) how the provision may be contrary to applicable law.
( d ) The Local Bureau Official must promptly notify the petitioners (with a copy to the recognized tribal governing body) of any problems identified under paragraph (c) of this section at least 30 days before calling the election.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:CDRH FY ... highlights**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.4601:
ItemNumber:0499-L-16(online)
CGPSystem Number:000599153
 
2005
2006
 
 **