alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 225.4 Authority and responsibility of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

The functions of the Bureau of Land Management are found in 43 CFR part 3160—Onshore Oil and Gas Operations, 43 CFR part 3180—Onshore Oil and Gas Unit Agreements: Unproven Areas, 43 CFR part 3260—Geothermal Resources Operations, 43 CFR part 3280—Geothermal Resources Unit Agreements: Unproven Areas, 43 CFR part 3480—Coal Exploration and Mining Operations, and 43 CFR part 3590—Solid Minerals (Other Than Coal) Exploration and Mining Operations. These functions include, but are not limited to, resource evaluation, approval of drilling permits, approval of mining, reclamation, and production plans, mineral appraisals, inspection and enforcement, and production verification. These regulations, as amended, apply to minerals agreements approved under this part.
### [§2366b. Renumbered §4252]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2366b was renumbered section 2366a of this title and subsequently was renumbered section 4251 of this title.
#### § 308.1 Penalties.

The use of Government trade-marks in an unauthorized manner, or the colorable imitation of such marks, is subject to the criminal penalties imposed by section 5 of the said act (49 Stat. 892; 25 U.S.C. 305d), which provides:

Any person who shall counterfeit or colorably imitate any Government trade-mark used or devised by the Board as provided in section 305a of this chapter, or shall, except as authorized by the Board, affix any such Government trade-mark, or shall knowingly, willfully, and corruptly affix any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation thereof upon any products Indian or otherwise, or to any labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, or receptacles intended to be used upon or in connection with the sale of such products, or any person who shall knowingly make any false statement for the purpose of obtaining the use of any such Government trade-mark, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be enjoined from further carrying on the act or acts complained of and shall be subject to a fine not exceeding $2,000, or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both such fine and imprisonment.
Federal Trade Commission ■ Bureau of Consumer Protection ■ Office of Consumer and Business Education

FTC Consumer Alert

Bogus July 1 Email Exposed:

The Real Deal on Your Credit File Privacy

An anonymous email containing false and misleading information about the use of your personal information

is showing up in email in-boxes across the country, leaving many consumers concerned and confused.

Here’s what the bogus email says:

“Just wanted to let everyone know who hasn’t already heard, the four major credit bureaus in the

U.S. will be allowed, starting July 1, to release your credit info, mailing addresses, phone numbers... to anyone who requests it. If you would like to “opt out” of this release of info., you can call

1-888-567-8688. It only takes a couple of minutes to do.”

Here’s the real deal from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the agency that enforces the Fair Credit

Reporting Act (FCRA).

ï The July 1 deadline relates to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB), which set July 1, 2001 as the

deadline for financial institutions to give you notice of their privacy policies and a way for you to

opt-out of some of their information-sharing practices. You may recall getting mailings or statement

inserts recently from your financial institutions, creditors, insurance companies and brokerage firms

about this. The July 1 date is not a deadline for consumers to do anything. In fact, consumers can

contact their financial institutions anytime to opt-out under GLB.

ï Credit bureaus can release your credit information only to people with a legitimate business need, as

recognized by the FCRA. For example, a company is allowed to get your report if you apply for

credit, insurance, employment, or to rent an apartment.

ï In addition to the uses described above, lenders and insurers may use information in your credit file

as a basis for sending you unsolicited offers of credit or insurance. This is known as ìprescreening.î

However, you have a right to opt out of these offers. The toll-free number ó 1-888-567-8688 ó is

the ìopt-outî line for the major credit bureaus for ìprescreenedî offers only.

For More Information

To learn more about your privacy rights under the FCRA and GLB, contact the FTC.

The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business practices in the

marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop and avoid them. To file a complaint or to

get free information on consumer issues, visit www.ftc.gov or call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-

4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft and other fraud-related

complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law

enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.

May 2003

F C EDERAL RADE OMMISSION T FTC OR HE ONSUMER

1-877-FTC-HELP www.ftc.gov
# C_2006326EN.01000901.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Heinrich Schulze GmbH & Co. KG i.L. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-120/05) (1)

1

(Export refunds - Conditions for granting - Export declaration - Lack of documentary evidence - Use of other types of evidence)

(2006/C 326/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Heinrich Schulze GmbH & Co. KG i.L.

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of the third subparagraph of Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1222/94 of 30 May 1994 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex II to the Treaty, and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (OJ 1994 L 136, p. 5) — Exporter unable to fulfil the obligation to provide the competent authorities, in support of its declaration, with all documents and information regarded by those authorities as appropriate — Documents destroyed by force majeure — Possibility of using other types of evidence.

Operative part of the judgment

The third subparagraph of Article 7(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1222/94 of 30 May 1994 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex II to the Treaty, and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 229/96 of 7 February 1996, is to be interpreted as not precluding an exporter from providing evidence by other means where it is unable to provide in support of its export declaration documentary evidence relating to the quantities of products actually used in the manufacture of exported goods, even in a case of force majeure. The national authorities are to assess that other means of evidence, in accordance with the detailed rules laid down in the national law, provided, however, that those rules do not affect either the scope or effectiveness of Community law. For that purpose, national authorities must also take into consideration documents previously exchanged with the exporter when the application is made under the simplified procedure provided for in the third subparagraph of Article 3(2) of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.06.2005.

1

---
§ 17.425 Counseling and use of appraisal and counseling materials. ( a ) *Counseling.* A recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex in the counseling or guidance of students or applicants for admission.
( b ) *Use of appraisal and counseling materials.* A recipient that uses testing or other materials for appraising or counseling students shall not use different materials for students on the basis of their sex or use materials that permit or require different treatment of students on such basis unless such different materials cover the same occupations and interest areas and the use of such different materials is shown to be essential to eliminate sex bias. Recipients shall develop and use internal procedures for ensuring that such materials do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Where the use of a counseling test or other instrument results in a substantially disproportionate number of members of one sex in any particular course of study or classification, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination in the instrument or its application.
( c ) *Disproportion in classes.* Where a recipient finds that a particular class contains a substantially disproportionate number of individuals of one sex, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination on the basis of sex in counseling or appraisal materials or by counselors.
§ 241.4 Subsistence and sport fishing, Annette Islands Reserve. ( a ) *Definitions.* ( 1 ) Subsistence fishing is the taking or attempting to take any species of fish or shellfish for purposes other than sale or barter, except as provided for in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) Sport fishing is the taking or attempting to take for personal use, and not for sale or barter, any fresh water, marine, or anadromous fish by hook and line or by such means as defined by regulation or statute of the State of Alaska.
( b ) *Restrictions.* Subsistence fishing within the Annette Islands Reserve shall be in accordance with the season, gear and bag restrictions established by rule or regulation of the Alaska Board of Fish and Game for Commercial Fishing in Fishing District No. 1. Sport fishing within the Annette Islands Reserve shall be in accordance with the season, gear and bag restrictions established by rule or regulation for Southeastern Alaska by the Alaska Board of Fish and Game. Both subsistence and sport fishing shall also be in accordance with such ordinances as may be adopted by the Council of the Metlakatla Indian Community and approved by the Secretary of the Interior.
### §1443. Forms of bank stock and obligations

Any stock, debentures, bonds, notes, or other obligations issued under the authority of this chapter may be issued in uncertificated form, utilizing a book entry method, or in certificated form under such rules, regulations, or guidelines as the Director 1 may provide.

(July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §23, 47 Stat. 739; Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §717, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 422; Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title II, §1204(8), (12), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2786.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–289, which directed amendment of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (this chapter) by substituting "the Director" for "the Board" and "Director" for "Federal Housing Finance Board" wherever appearing, was executed to this section by substituting "the Director" for "the Board of Directors of the Federal Housing Finance Board", to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "In order that the Federal Home Loan Banks may be supplied with such forms of stock, debentures, and bonds as may be necessary under this chapter, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to prepare such forms thereof as shall be suitable and approved by the board, which shall be held in the Treasury subject to delivery, upon order of the board. The engraved plates, dies, and bed pieces executed in connection therewith shall remain in the custody of the Secretary of the Treasury. The board shall reimburse the Secretary of the Treasury for any expense incurred in the preparation, custody, and delivery of such stock, debentures, and bonds."

1 See 2008 Amendment note below.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-6 

November 14, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4006(a)(3) Premium Rates. Initial Rates

4021(b)(7) Plans Covered. Foreign Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your recent letter raising a question as whether Canadian participants of a pension plan should

be counted for insurance premium purposes when the Company maintaining the plan is located in Minneapolis and has

a sales office in Canada? 

Section 4021 (b)(7) excludes from coverage a plan "which is established and maintained outside of the United States

primarily for the benefit of individuals substantially all of whom are nonresident aliens." It appears from your letter that

your situation is not within that exclusion. The Act does not provide for the omission of nonresident participants of

covered plans in making the premium payment computation. Therefore, you should count the Canadian participants in

the plan for purposes of computing the premium payable to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. 

Henry Rose 

Acting General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald C. Kolasch, President,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  	The information contained in the Report fairly represents,
        in all material aspects, the financial condition and result
        of operations on the Company.



/s/ Donald C. Kolasch
------------------------------
Donald C. Kolasch, President



<PAGE>
#### § 502.21 Tribal-State compact.

*Tribal-State compact* means an agreement between a tribe and a state about class III gaming under 25 U.S.C. 2710(d).
### §948d. Jurisdiction of military commissions

A military commission under this chapter shall have jurisdiction to try persons subject to this chapter for any offense made punishable by this chapter, sections 904 and 906 of this title (articles 104 and 106 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), or the law of war, whether such offense was committed before, on, or after September 11, 2001, and may, under such limitations as the President may prescribe, adjudge any punishment not forbidden by this chapter, including the penalty of death when specifically authorized under this chapter. A military commission is a competent tribunal to make a finding sufficient for jurisdiction.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2576.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 948d, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2603, related to jurisdiction of military commissions, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.

A prior section 948e, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2603, which required the Secretary of Defense to submit an annual report to congressional committees, was omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84. See section 1806 of Pub. L. 111–84, set out as a note under section 948a of this title.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**  Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2012, by and among JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Certificate Administrator, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank, National Association as Trustee and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates JP Morgan 2012- C6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
de
National

Ironwood Forest if
I
}

\.04

Monument \

Ironwood, Forest

TRAVEL MANAGEMENT

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft Resource Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
March 2007

TRAVEL ROUTE INVENTORY

Township 11 South
Range 8 East

Gila and Salt River Principal Meridian, Arizona

a National Monument Boundary

Public Lands Administered by the
Bureau of Land Management

State Trust Lands

Military Reservation

———— _ Monument Travel Route Inventory

Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheriod

NAD27 Datum

i} 1 Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
for the use of this map for purposes not intended by the BLM, or
to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information
shown. Spatial information may not meet National map Accuracy
Standards. This information may be updated without notification.

United States Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Management

Tucson Field Office

Arizona

S
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

p0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144864 & (14)

JANE DOE, as Next Friend for JUNE DOE,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 14 4864

COA: 307516

Wexford CC: 10

- 022828

- NO

KAREN V. FERRIS,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

DENNIS KAINE FERRIS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is

DENIED as moot.
# C_2006326EN.01007101.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/71

---

Action brought on 27 November 2006 — Moreira da Fonseca v OHIM — General Óptica (GENERAL OPTICA)

(Case T-320/06)

(2006/C 326/147)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Alberto Jorge Moreira da Fonseca Lda (Santo Tirso, Portugal) (represented by: M. Oehen Mendes, lawyer)

Applicant:

da

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: General Óptica SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 August 2006 notified to the applicant 27 September 2006, in cancellation proceedings No 829C (Case No R 946/2005-1) and consequently declare Community trade mark No 2 436 723‘GENERAL OPTICA’ filed on 5 November 2001 and registered on 31 January 2003, as invalid, or in the alternative, revoked; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 August 2006 notified to the applicant 27 September 2006, in cancellation proceedings No 829C (Case No R 946/2005-1) and consequently declare Community trade mark No 2 436 723‘GENERAL OPTICA’ filed on 5 November 2001 and registered on 31 January 2003, as invalid, or in the alternative, revoked;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The figurative mark ‘GENERAL OPTICA’ for services in class 42 (Opticians' services) — Community trade mark No 2 436 723

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: General Óptica SA

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The earlier national trade name ‘Generalóptica’ for import and retail sale of optical, precision and photographic apparatus

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of among others Article 8(1) and (4) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as there is a likelihood of confusion between the two signs and the applicant's sign is granted national protection.

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Rule 22 of Commission Regulation No 2868/95 as OHIM omitted its duty to ask the applicant to present evidence of the earlier use invoked.

---
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic StandardsClassroom TechniquesCultural AwarenessElementary Secondary EducationEnglish (Second Language)Family EnvironmentHigh Risk StudentsKindergartenLanguage ProficiencyLiteracy EducationLow AchievementSecond Language Learning

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget