alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001062363
<NAME> RENAISSANCE MEDIA GROUP LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                        56
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,875
<PP&E>                                          76,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 471,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,184
<BONDS>                                         88,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     369,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   471,522
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,541
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,590
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,970)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,970)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 162.350 What are the consent requirements for an assignment of a residential lease? ( a ) Unless the lease provides otherwise, the lessee must notify all Indian landowners of the proposed assignment.
( b ) The Indian landowners, or their representatives under § 162.013, must consent to an assignment of a residential lease in the same percentages and manner as a new residential lease under § 162.012, unless the lease: ( 1 ) Provides for assignments without further consent of the Indian landowners or with consent in specified percentages and manner;
( 2 ) Provides that individual Indian landowners are deemed to have consented where they do not object in writing to the assignment within a specified period of time following the landowners' receipt of the assignment and the lease meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section;
( 3 ) Authorizes one or more of the Indian landowners to consent on behalf of all Indian landowners; or
( 4 ) Designates us as the Indian landowners' representative for the purposes of consenting to an assignment.
( c ) If the lease provides for deemed consent under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, it must require the parties to submit to us: ( 1 ) A copy of the executed assignment or other documentation of any Indian landowners' actual consent;
( 2 ) Proof of mailing of the assignment to any Indian landowners who are deemed to have consented; and
( 3 ) Any other pertinent information for us to review.
( d ) The lessee must obtain the consent of the holders of any mortgages.
§ 115.118 Upgrades to facilities and technologies. ( a ) When designing or acquiring any new holding facility and in planning any substantial expansion or modification of existing holding facilities, the agency shall consider the effect of the design, acquisition, expansion, or modification upon the agency's ability to protect detainees from sexual abuse.
( b ) When installing or updating a video monitoring system, electronic surveillance system, or other monitoring technology in a holding facility, the agency shall consider how such technology may enhance the agency's ability to protect detainees from sexual abuse.
ARE

a? 2se,008

|
|

a

76°00"

41 T!

76°00"

40°00" |

DEPTH
GRADIENTS

Feet
°

Max Depth

NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX

BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL /O. METERS
WITH SUPPLEMENTARY 2 METER CONTOURS
DATUM |S MEAN LOW WATER

NEWARK, N.J, PA; NY.
“4 32-

AK (e-ll
# CA2006181EN.01002701.xml

| 3.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 181/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 181/27

---

RESERVE LISTS

   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

(1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/7/05

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/7/05

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS (HEADS OF UNIT — A*12)

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS (HEADS OF UNIT — A*12)

IN THE FIELD OF TRANSLATION

IN THE FIELD OF TRANSLATION

(2006/C 181 A/06)

CZECH (CS)

| ZELINGER | David |
| --- | --- |

ZELINGER

David

ESTONIAN (ET)

| TOMBERG | Erik |
| --- | --- |

TOMBERG

Erik

HUNGARIAN (HU)

| LIGETI | Bernadette |
| --- | --- |
| TARNAI | Agnes |
| VANYI | Balint |

LIGETI

Bernadette

TARNAI

Agnes

VANYI

Balint

LITHUANIAN (LT)

| DEDONIENE (BERESNEVICIUTE) | Rita |
| --- | --- |

DEDONIENE (BERESNEVICIUTE)

Rita

LATVIAN (LV)

No successful candidate

MALTESE (MT)

No successful candidate

POLISH (PL)

| GRABOWSKI | Jacek |
| --- | --- |
| KADUCZAK | Jaroslaw |
| LATOMSKI (MISTEWICZ) | Helena |
| TROJAN (CHELMINSKA) | Monika |

GRABOWSKI

Jacek

KADUCZAK

Jaroslaw

LATOMSKI (MISTEWICZ)

Helena

TROJAN (CHELMINSKA)

Monika

SLOVAKIAN (SK)

| SALGOVIC | Jan |
| --- | --- |

SALGOVIC

Jan

SLOVENIAN (SL)

| KRAVOS | Marko |
| --- | --- |
| SPORAR | Bostjan |

KRAVOS

Marko

SPORAR

Bostjan

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2007 and may be extended.

31 December 2007

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER V—BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
#### § 48.206 What approvals are necessary to accept a donation under this subpart?

Prior to accepting a donation valued at $5,000 or more under this subpart, the Director's designee must approve the acceptance and certify that it complies with this subpart, including the considerations of § 48.205, Departmental policy, and any applicable statute or regulation.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Annual Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 15, 2018

















/s/ Mark Gatto


Mark Gatto


Co-Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


CĪON Investment Corporation
# C_2006326EN.01003102.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/31

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 18 October 2006 — Comunidad Autónoma de La Rioja v Diputación Foral de Álava, Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Álava, Confederación Empresarial vasca

(Case C-430/06)

(2006/C 326/64)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Comunidad Autónoma de La Rioja

Applicant:

Defendants: Diputación Foral de Álava, Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Álava, Confederación Empresarial vasca

Defendants:

Question referred

Must Article 87(1) EC be construed as meaning that, by providing for a rate of tax lower than the basic rate set in Spanish State legislation and for a deduction from the amount of tax payable which does not exist in State tax legislation, provisions in the field of taxation adopted by the Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Álava amending Articles 29(1)(a) and 37 of the Provincial Law on Company Tax, which take effect in the jurisdiction of that infra-State autonomous body, must be regarded as selective and as covered by the definition of State aid enshrined in Article 87(1) EC and, accordingly, must be notified to the Commission pursuant to Article 88(3) EC?

---
# C_2006294EN.01002201.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/22

---

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Bolzano — Italy) — Eurodomus srl v Comune di Bolzano

(Case C-166/06) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/37)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale civile di Bolzano

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eurodomus srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Comune di Bolzano

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale civile di Bolzano — Interpretation of Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union — Provincial administration adopting regulations capable of impeding the application of a decision of an administrative court that is res judicata — Compatibility with Community law

Operative part of the order

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunale civile di Bolzano, by decision of 4 January 2006, is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 154, 01.07.2006

1

---
§ 67.7 Filing of application forms. ( a ) Application forms filed by mail must be postmarked no later than midnight on the deadline date specified in § 67.4(b). Where there is no postmark date showing on the envelope or the postmark date is illegible, application forms mailed from within the United States, including Alaska and Hawaii, received more than 15 days after the specified deadline, and application forms mailed from outside of the United States received more than 30 days after the specified deadline in the office of the Superintendent, will be rejected for failure to file in time.
( b ) Application forms filed by personal delivery must be received in the office of the Superintendent no later than close of business on the deadline date specified in § 67.4(b).
( c ) If the deadline date for filing application forms falls on a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or other nonbusiness day, the deadline will be the next working day thereafter.
(logo) pwc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the "Company"), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2014 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination. 

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. 

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, TX 75201-2997

T: (214) 999 1400, F: (214)754 7991, www.pwc.com/us
Participant List US EPA Listening Session on Greenhouse Gas Standards for Utilities and Petroleum Refineries Session with Environmental Organizations and Environmental Justice Representatives February 15, 2011

FIRST LAST ORGANIZATION Peter Bahouth US Climate Action Network LaTosha Brown Gulf Coast Fund Cecil Corbin-Mark Environmental Justice Leadership Forum on Climate Change Gerald Durley Providence Missionary Baptist Church John Hammond National Wildlife Federation Daniel Lashof, Ph.D. Natural Resources Defense Council Mark MacLeod Environmental Defense Fund Cecilia Martinez Environmental Justice Advocates of Minnesota N. Jonathan Peress Conservation Law Foundation Frank Rambo Southern Environmental Law Center Seandra Rawls Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Peter Shattuck Environment Northeast Nicky Sheats New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance Joanne Spalding Sierra Club Kurt Waltzer Clean Air Task Force Sharonda Williams WE ACT for Environmental Justice
### Stratigraphy of the Kohat Quadrangle, Pakistan

By: Charles R. Meissner Jr.J.M. MasterM.A. RashidMuzaffar Hussain

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp716D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
NO. 03-14-00531-CR

DERRICK KUYKENDALL * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appellant *

VS. * OF THE THIRD

* SUPREME JUDICIAL

* DISTRICT OF TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS *

Appellee * AT AUSTIN TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLATE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Appellant, and files this Motion for an Extension in which to

file the Appellant’s Brief. In support of this motion, appellant shows the Court the

following:

I.

The Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Travis County, Texas of

the offense of Manslaughter. After a probation revocation hearing, Appellant was

assessed 15 years TDCJ. 

II.

The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Brief is July 27, 2015 and Appellant has

requested one previous extensions.

III.

ACCEPTED

03-14-00531-CR

6225530

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/27/2015 8:20:13 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/27/2015 8:20:13 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Attorney for the Appellant would further show the Court that he has been

diligent in preparing Appellee’s brief in this case. Due to a very busy docket counsel

is unable to complete the brief within the time frame. Counsel requests an extension

of time so that he may adequately prepare Appellant’s Brief. Counsel must complete

his investigation of the record and draft the brief. 

WHEREFORE, Appellant prays the Court grant this Motion and extend the

deadline for filing the Appellant’s Brief to September 8, 2015. 

Respectfully Submitted,

ARIEL PAYAN

Attorney at Law

1012 Rio Grande

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 478-3900

(512) 472-4102 (fax)

Arielpayan@hotmail.com

 /s/ Ariel Payan 

ARIEL PAYAN

State Bar No. 00794430

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

By my signature above, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above

and foregoing Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellate Brief has been delivered

to the Criminal District Attorney of said County Texas, on July 27, 2015.
§ 81.46 How does the Bureau proceed upon receiving a request for an OIWA Election if no provisions are contrary to applicable law? If the proposed document does not contain any provision that may be contrary to applicable law, the Bureau will take the following steps. ( a ) The Authorizing Official will issue a memorandum to the Local Bureau Official: ( 1 ) Approving the proposed document or proposed amendments;
( 2 ) Authorizing the Local Bureau Official to call and conduct a Secretarial election, within 90 days from the date of receiving the tribal request;
( 3 ) Attaching the document or proposed language to be voted upon;
( 4 ) Attaching the Certificate of Results of Election, with instructions to return it at the conclusion of the Secretarial election. The Certificate shall read as follows: Certificate of Results of Election Under a Secretarial election authorized by (name and title of authorizing official) on (date), the attached [insert: Governing document and Bylaws, charter of incorporation, amendment or revocation] of the (official name of tribe) was submitted to the registered voters of the tribe and on (date) duly (insert: adopted, ratified, rejected or revoked) by a vote of (number) for and (number) against and (number) cast ballots found spoiled in an election in which at least 30 percent (or such “percentages” as may be required to amend according the governing document) of the (number) registered voters cast their ballot in accordance with (appropriate Federal statute). Signed: ______________________________________ (by the Chair of the Secretarial Election Board and Board Members) Date: __________________________________.; and
( 5 ) Advising that no changes or modifications can be made to any of the attached documents, without prior approval from the Authorizing Official.
( b ) The Local Bureau Official will appoint the Chair of the Secretarial Election Board and notify the tribe of the need to appoint at least two tribal members to the Secretarial Election Board. If the election is to be held as the result of a petition, then the Local Bureau Official will appoint a Bureau employee to serve as the Chair of the Secretarial Election Board and notify the tribe and the spokesperson for the petitioners of the need to appoint one tribal member each, who is at least 18 years of age, to the Secretarial Election Board. If the tribe or spokesperson declines or fails for any reason to make the appointment(s) by close of business on the 10th day after the date the notice letter is issued, the Chair of the Secretarial Election Board must appoint the representative(s), who are tribal members, if available, on the 11th day after the notice letter is issued.