alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31**

**SEMT 2012-2**

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification. 

I, Christopher J. Abate, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-2 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken asa whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Corelogic Tax Services, LLC, Assurant, Inc., Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells FargoBank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent. 

Date: April 1, 2019 

 

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Financial Officer 

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-48 

November 19, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021. Plans Covered 

OPINION: 

 In your letter of October 28, 1975, you asked for the rationale behind the requirement that fully insured defined

benefit plans pay premiums to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC"). 

In our view, the statute requires such payments. Section 4021 of the Act defines the scope of ERISA's mandatory

termination insurance provisions. With thirteen enumerated exceptions, see § 4021(b) of the Act, compulsory coverage

extends to any employee pension benefit plan that has met Internal Revenue Code requirements governing "qualified"

plans for the preceding five years. There is no exception for plans funded by the purchase of insurance or annuity

contracts, and § 4007(a), requiring "the Plan Administrator of each plan . . ." to pay premiums makes no such exception,

either. 

By contrast, elsewhere in Title IV Congress has accorded special treatment to "insured" plans. Section 4062 of the

Act makes employers liable to the PBGC for the amount of a terminated plan's asset insufficiency. But that section

expressly insulates employers from such liability "to the extent . . . arising out of the involvency of an insurance company

with respect to an insurance contract," [*2] S.4062(a)(2). This provision demonstrates that Congress was fully aware

of the existence of "insured" plans when it enacted Title IV, but did not choose to exempt them from coverage. Of

course, even insurance-funded plans represent some risk for the PBGC, which would be obligated to pay benefits upon

termination if an insured plan had failed to pay premiums if the insurer were insolvent, or if the plan promised benefits

in excess of the values in the policies. From a broader perspective, we note that unlike traditional private insurance

programs, Title IV of ERISA is not based strictly on familiar insurance concepts. Thus, the initial premium a plan must

pay is not related to the risk that it will terminate or to its underfunding, if any. Furthermore, participants are insured

whether or not the plan has paid premiums. Act § 4007(d). 

Fairly read, the statute seems to contemplate a scheme whereby the entire universe of covered plans provides

revenues to protect participants in plans which are not fully funded from the risk of termination. While I can understand

that those who are responsible for fully funded, insured plans may feel that insurance is unnecessary, it does not [*3]

strike me as inappropriate for Congress to have required all covered plans to assist in financing the program. 

I trust that this letter answers your inquiry. 

George B. Driesen 

Deputy General Counsel
-  Home 
-  Data and Statistics 
-  Pipeline 

# In This Section

                      -  Data and Statistics Overview 
                      -  Pipeline Operator Safety Program Data 
                      -  National Pipeline Performance Measures 
                      -  State Pipeline Performance Measures 
                      -  Pipeline Replacement Updates 
                      -  Federal Enforcement Transparency 
                      -  Operator Information 
                      -  National Pipeline Mapping System 
                      -  Source Data 
                      -  Data Visualization 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Pipeline Replacement Updates                   
                  -                                          National Pipeline Mapping System                   

## Contact Us

Pipeline Data and Statistics
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**PHMSAPHPDataandStatistics@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Data and Statistics Overview

PHMSA's Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) provides a variety of data about federally-regulated and state-regulated natural gas pipelines, hazardous liquid pipelines, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants. The operators of these pipeline facilities report this data in accordance with Part 191 and Part 195 of PHMSA's pipeline safety regulations. PHMSA provides downloads of the raw data, yearly summaries, multi-year trends of safety performance metrics, and inventories tracking the removal of aging and other higher-risk infrastructure.

## Frequently Requested Data

Pipeline Mileage and Facilities

Pipeline Incident Flagged Files

Pipeline Incident 20 Year Trends
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-151 

July 21, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4044 Allocation of Assets 

OPINION: 

 This concerns a letter to * * * of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") from * * *, a

participant in the terminated * * * (the "Plan"). * * * requested that the PBGC determine whether it is proper for you

to charge against Plan assets the legal fees arising from termination of the Plan. 

As I understand the pertinent facts, on * * * you submitted a valid Notice of Intent to Terminate the Plan, and on

* * * the PBGC issued a Notice of Sufficiency. In a letter dated * * * informed you and * * * that he intends to

submit a billing statement for approximately * * * for legal services and disbursements arising from termination of

the Plan. In his letter * * * stated that he believes you intend to deduct the legal fees from the assets of the Plan's

Separate Investment Fund before you distribute the assets to the participants, thereby decreasing the amount of assets

available for distribution * * * suggested that these fees may be the responsibility of * * * (the "Employer") and not

the responsibility of the Plan. 

The PBGC is responsible for carrying out the provisions of Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). [*2] Title IV provides that when a plan terminates, the plan administrator must

allocate the assets "available to provide benefits" among the priority categories set forth in § 4044. If a terminating

plan is not responsible for a particular expense and the plan administrator nevertheless charges the expense against

plan assets, he misuses the assets available to provide benefits and thereby violates § 4044 of the Act. 

Moreover, if under the plan provisions a plan is not responsible for a particular expense, charging the expense to

the plan may violate Title I of the Act. When PBGC discovers possible Title I violations, it ordinarily forwards the

matter to the United States Department of Labor ("DOL"), which administers Title I. 

In a telephone conversation with * * * of this office, * * * indicated that you wish to avoid the delay that might

take place if this matter is referred to the DOL for investigation. Please advise whether you will pay the legal fees

out of the Employer's general assets. If you have not so advised us by * * *, we will take appropriate action. 

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call * * * 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### §1522. Protection of creditors and other interested persons

(a) The court may grant relief under section 1519 or 1521, or may modify or terminate relief under subsection (c), only if the interests of the creditors and other interested entities, including the debtor, are sufficiently protected.

(b) The court may subject relief granted under section 1519 or 1521, or the operation of the debtor's business under section 1520(a)(3), to conditions it considers appropriate, including the giving of security or the filing of a bond.

(c) The court may, at the request of the foreign representative or an entity affected by relief granted under section 1519 or 1521, or at its own motion, modify or terminate such relief.

(d) Section 1104(d) shall apply to the appointment of an examiner under this chapter. Any examiner shall comply with the qualification requirements imposed on a trustee by section 322.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 142.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We hereby consent to the use of the name DeGolyer and MacNaughton, to references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton as independent petroleum engineers, and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information taken from our “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2012 on Certain Properties owned by Linn Energy, LLC,” “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2011 on Certain Properties owned by Linn Energy, LLC” and “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2010 on Certain Properties owned by Linn Energy, LLC” in the sections “Business,” “Risk Factors,” “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Supplemental Oil and Gas Data (Unaudited)” incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Linn Energy, LLC Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012, and in the registration statement (No. 333-182305) on Form S-1 of LinnCo, LLC.  We further consent to the inclusion of our Letter Report dated June 3, 2013, incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Linn Energy, LLC Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 included as Exhibit 99.2 in the LinnCo, LLC Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012.








Very truly yours,





/s/  DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON


Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716


Dallas, Texas  November 5, 2013
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# PD-7(R): Maryland Certification Requirements for Transporters of Oil or Controlled Hazardous Substances
#### Sarah Schwartz, as Administratrix, etc., of Herman Schwartz, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*George Lippman and Martin Haase, Appellants.

Appeal from part of an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 14th day of December, 1907, granting motion for a bill of particulars.

Per Curiam:

The appeal should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs-arid disbursements, upon the ground that the order was entered upon the motion of the plaintiff; hut without prejudice to a motion for a resettlement of the order, or for a renewal of the application for a bill of particulars at the Special Term on proper papers. Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Appeal dismissed, with, ten dollars costs and disbursements.
H. Res. 351

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 2, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named member be, and is

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES:

Mr. Ackerman of New York, to rank immediately after Mr.

Watt of North Carolina.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2007020EN.01001301.xml

| 27.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 November 2006 — Consorzio Elisoccorso San Raffaele v Elilombarda s.r.l.

(Case C-492/06)

(2007/C 20/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Consorzio Elisoccorso San Raffaele

Applicant:

Defendant: Elilombarda s.r.l.

Defendant:

Question referred

Where a consortium without legal personality has participated as such in a procedure for the award of a public contract and has not been awarded that contract, is Article 1 of Council Directive 89/665/EEC (1) of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Council Directive 92/50/EEC (2) of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, to be interpreted as precluding the possibility under national law for an individual member of that consortium to bring an action against the decision awarding the contract?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33.

1

(2)  OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1.

2

---
### §1735f. Water and sewerage facilities

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, no mortgage which covers new construction shall be approved for insurance under this chapter (except pursuant to a commitment made prior to August 10, 1965) if the mortgaged property includes housing which is not served by a public or adequate community water and sewerage system: Provided, That this limitation shall be applicable only to property which is not served by a system approved by the Secretary pursuant to subchapter IX–A of this chapter, as such subchapter existed immediately before December 15, 1989, and which is situated in an area certified by appropriate local officials to be an area where the establishment of public or adequate community water and sewerage systems is economically feasible: Provided further, That for purposes of this section the economic feasibility of establishing such public or adequate community water and sewerage systems shall be determined without regard to whether such establishment is authorized by law or is subject to approval by one or more local governments or public bodies.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title V, §522, as added Pub. L. 89–117, title II, §217(a), Aug. 10, 1965, 79 Stat. 473; amended Pub. L. 90–19, §1(a)(3), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 17; Pub. L. 101–235, title I, §133(d)(4), Dec. 15, 1989, 103 Stat. 2027.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapter IX–A of this chapter, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 101–235, title I, §133(a), Dec. 15, 1989, 103 Stat. 2027.

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–235 inserted ", as such subchapter existed immediately before December 15, 1989," after "subchapter IX–A of this chapter".

1967—Pub. L. 90–19 substituted "Secretary" for "Commissioner".
#### PARKS CHEVROLET, INC. v. JUREL BLACKBURN GWYN

No. 439PA89

(Filed 10 May 1990)

ON plaintiff’s petition for discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, which found no error in the judgment entered by *Biggs, J.,*at the 27 June 1988 session of District Court, FORSYTH County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 April 1990.

*David F. Tamer for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Legal Aid Society of Northwest North Carolina, Inc., by Susan Gottsegen and Ellen W. Gerber, for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

Discretionary review improvidently allowed.
KOREAN • APRIL 2004 
5'4" 134 5'4" 151 5'4" 145
 

5'5" 138 5'5" 156 5'5" 150
 

5'6" 142 5'6" 161 5'6" 155
 

5'7" 146 5'7" 166 5'7" 159
 

5'8" 151 5'8" 171 5'8" 164
 

5'9" 155 5'9" 176 5'9" 169
 

5'10" 160 5'10" 181 5'10" 174
 

5'11" 165 5'11" 186 5'11" 179
 

6'0" 169 6'0" 191 6'0" 184
 

6'1" 174 6'1" 197 6'1" 189
 

6'2" 179 6'2" 202 6'2" 194
 

6'3" 184 6'3" 208 6'3" 200
 

6'4" 189 6'4" 213 6'4" 205
 

NIH Publication No. 04-5524 KOREAN • APRIL 2004 

NDEP-74KO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 60

### CFR Correction

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60 (§ 60.1 to end of part 60 sections), revised as of July 1, 2010:

1. On page 334, at the end of § 60.101a, an effective date note is added to read as follows:

§ 60.101a 

* * * * *

# Effective Date Note:

At 73 FR 78552, Dec. 22, 2008, in § 60.101a the definition of “flare” was stayed from Feb. 24, 2009 until further notice.

2. On page 337, at the end of § 60.102a, an effective date note is added to read as follows:

§ 60.102a 

* * * * *

# Effective Date Note:

At 73 FR 78552, Dec. 22, 2008, in § 60.102a, paragraph (g) was stayed from Feb. 24, 2009 until further notice.

3. On page 353, at the end of § 60.107a, an effective date note is added to read as follows:

§ 60.107a 

* * * * *

# Effective Date Note:

At 73 FR 78552, Dec. 22, 2008, in § 60.107a, paragraphs (d) and (e) were stayed from Feb. 24, 2009 until further notice.

[FR Doc. 2011-4310 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### § 33.4 Redelegation of authority.

The authorities of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs as delegated to the Director, Office of Indian Education Programs may be redelegated by the Director to a Bureau of Indian Affairs Agency Superintendent for Education, to a Bureau Area Education Programs Director, or to a President of a Bureau of Indian Affairs post-secondary education institution.
#### § 62.8 Advising the tribal committee.

Whenever applicable, the Superintendent or Director shall notify the tribal committee of the receipt of the appeal and shall give the tribal committee the opportunity to examine the appeal and to present such evidence as it may consider pertinent to the action being appealed. The tribal committee shall have not to exceed 30 days from receipt of notification of the appeal in which to present in writing such statements as if may deem pertinent, supported by any tribal records which have a bearing on the case. The Director or Superintendent may grant the tribal committee additional time, upon request, for its review.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7323]


U.S. National Commission for UNESCO Notice of Meeting in Closed 
and Open Session

    The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a meeting in 
closed session on Thursday March 10, 2011, from 1 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. 
EST. Commission members will convene in closed session in order to 
discuss applications for the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO Laura 
W. Bush Traveling Fellowship, a fellowship funded through privately 
donated funds. This session will be closed pursuant to Section 10(d) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) because it 
is likely to involve discussion of information of a personal nature 
regarding the relative merits of individual applicants where disclosure 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    From 1:30 p.m. to 2 p.m. on Thursday March 10, 2011, the U.S. 
National Commission for UNESCO will meet in open session, with public 
participation by telephone. The open session will feature a discussion 
about the Commission's upcoming programmatic schedule, during which the 
Commission will accept brief oral comments or questions from the public 
or media. The public comment period will be limited to approximately 10 
minutes in total, with 2 minutes allowed per speaker.
    For more information or to arrange to participate in the open 
portion of the meeting, individuals should contact Eric Woodard, 
Executive Director of the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, 
Washington, DC 20037. Telephone (202) 663-0026; Fax 202-663-0035; E-
mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f6b6c7a616a7c6c606f5c5b4e5b4a01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="094d4a5c474c5a4a46497a7d687d6c276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 24, 2011.
Eric Woodard,
Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2011-4715 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>