alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 83.29 What will OFA consider in its reviews? ( a ) In any review, OFA will consider the documented petition and evidence submitted by the petitioner, any comments and evidence on the petition received during the comment period, and petitioners' responses to comments and evidence received during the response period.
( b ) OFA may also: ( 1 ) Initiate and consider other research for any purpose relative to analyzing the documented petition and obtaining additional information about the petitioner's status; and
( 2 ) Request and consider timely submitted additional explanations and information from commenting parties to support or supplement their comments on the proposed finding and from the petitioner to support or supplement their responses to comments.
( c ) OFA must provide the petitioner with the additional material obtained in paragraph (b) of this section, and provide the petitioner with the opportunity to respond to the additional material. The additional material and any response by the petitioner will become part of the record.
# C_2006331EN.01004201.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/42

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 15 November 2006 — Jiménez Martínez v Commission

(Case T-115/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Invalidity - Invalidity Committee - Preparatory measure - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Irregularity in the pre-litigation procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2006/C 331/92)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: José Juan Jiménez Martínez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and K. Hermann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the Invalidity Committee's decisions of 21 April and 22 July 2004 and, secondly, for damages as compensation for loss allegedly suffered as a result of those decisions

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 115, 14.5.2005.

1

---
# C_2006186EN.01000101.xml

| 9.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 August 2006

(2006/C 186/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2839 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4614 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67380 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1830 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5738 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,19 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9095 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5760 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,245 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,66 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8723 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5225 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,67 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,570 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8826 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6894 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4369 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9839 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0561 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0191 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 237,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,7225 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2368 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2928 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 670,65 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,709 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,928 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3080 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,386 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2839

JPY

Japanese yen

147,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4614

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67380

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1830

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5738

ISK

Iceland króna

91,19

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9095

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5760

CZK

Czech koruna

28,245

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,66

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8723

RON

Romanian leu

3,5225

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,67

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,570

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8826

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6894

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4369

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9839

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0561

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0191

KRW

South Korean won

1 237,23

ZAR

South African rand

8,7225

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2368

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2928

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 670,65

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,709

PHP

Philippine peso

65,928

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3080

THB

Thai baht

48,386

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Barry W. Tackett
Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer

Date: May 16, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Saul Ewing LLP on behalf of Trinity Industries, Inc. (WB605-7-09/20/10) for permission to use certain data from the Board's 2009 Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of Economics.

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

Contact: Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330

Andrea Pope-Matheson,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2011-450 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ramsey K. Hamadi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ Ramsey K. Hamadi   
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Ramsey K. Hamadi       
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2006281EN.01003601.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/36

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2006 — Comunidad autónoma de Madrid and Mintra v Commission

(Case T-148/05) (1)

1

(Provision of data relating to the excessive deficit procedure - Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 - European system of accounts 1995 (ESA 95) - Regulation (EC) No 2223/96 - Letter of the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat) - Action for annulment - Act against which proceedings can be brought - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 281/62)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Comunidad autónoma de Madrid and Madrid, infraestructuras del transporte (Mintra) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: C. Fernandez Vicién, D. Ortega Peciña and J. Sabater Marotias, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Diaz-Llanos La Roche and L. Escobar Guerrero, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission contained in a letter of the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat) of 3 February 2005 concerning the classification of Madrid, infraestructuras del transporte (Mintra) in the sector ‘public administrations’ within the European system of accounts 1995 (ESA 1995).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | The applicants shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 143 of 11.6.2005.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 647 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 25, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4811) making 
appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 293.28 May a compact or extension include provisions that limit the duration of the compact?

Yes. However, IGRA anticipates compacts are long-term agreements between a Tribe and a State. These agreements reflect carefully negotiated compromises between sovereigns. A refusal to negotiate a long-term compact, or a short-term extension of at least one year to allow for negotiations to continue, may be considered evidence of a violation of IGRA.
H. Res. 496

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 10, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3709) to make permanent the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom Act as it applies to new,

multiple, and discriminatory taxes on the Internet. The first

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order

against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with

clause 4(a) of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall be

confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule for a period not to exceed two hours. It shall

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the
2

•HRES 496 EH

Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of

the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of

rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1)

postpone until a time during further consideration in the

Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 496 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1030

AN ACT

To provide that the conveyance by the Bureau of Land

Management of the surface estate to certain land in

the State of Wyoming in exchange for certain private

land will not result in the removal of the land from

operation of the mining laws.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1030 ES

1 SECTION 1. 60 BAR LAND EXCHANGE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 2201.1–2(d) and

3 2091.3–2(c) of title 43 Code of Federal Regulations, shall

4 not apply in the case of the conveyance by the Secretary

5 of the Interior of the land described in subsection (b) in

6 exchange for approximately 9,480 acres of land in Camp7 bell County, Wyoming, pursuant to the terms of the Cow

8 Creek/60 Bar land exchange, WYW–143315.

9 (b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land described in this

10 subsection comprises the following land in Campbell and

11 Johnson Counties, Wyoming:

12 (1) Approximately 2,960 acres of land in the

13 tract known as the ‘‘Bill Barlow Ranch’’;

14 (2) Approximately 2,315 acres of land in the

15 tract know as the ‘‘T-Chair Ranch’’;

16 (3) Approximately 3,948 acres of land in the

17 tract known as the ‘‘Bob Christensen Ranch’’;

18 (4) Approximately 11,609 acres of land in the

19 tract known as the ‘‘John Christensen Ranch’’.

20 (c) SEGREGATION FROM ENTRY.—Land acquired by

21 the United States in the exchange under subsection (a)
3

S 1030 ES

1 shall be segregated from entry under the mining laws until

2 appropriate land use planning is completed for the land.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1030

AN ACT

To provide that the conveyance by the Bureau of

Land Management of the surface estate to certain land in the State of Wyoming in exchangefor certain private land will not result in the removal of the land from operation of the mininglaws.
#### Anita Howell, Respondent, v. Otto C. Heinze and Others, Appellants, Impleaded, etc.

Motion denied upon condition that appellantshave their appeal ready for argument at the March term. .■
### §§1291 to 1293. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–230, §24, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 466

Sections, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title II, §214(a)–(c), 42 Stat. 1470, related to procedure for consolidation and capital stock, dissenting stockholders, and effect of consolidation, respectively.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Kedist Girma (a/k/a Kedist Hirpassa), 

Plaintiff, 

FILED 

JUN 1 5 2010 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No.: 10 0999 

United States Postal Service, 

Defendant. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The plaintiff has filed an application to proceed without prepayffit;!nt of fees and a pro se 

complaint. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915( e )(2)(B)(ii) (requiring dismissal of a complaint whenever it is determined that it fails to 

state a claim upon which relief may be granted). 

In this brief complaint, the plaintiff states that she has not been receiving mail she 

expects, and believes that "someone within the postal service is committing a federal crime by 

illegally taking my mail." Compl. at 1 (spelling altered). The complaint does not identify the 

relief sought. 

If the plaintiff is seeking to initiate a prosecution, she seeks relief that cannot be granted. 

Only a federal prosecutor, not a civilian complainant, can bring a federal prosecution for federal 

crimes. If, alternatively, the plaintiff is seeking damages, such relief is also not available. As an 

entity of the United States government, the United States Postal Service may not be sued except 

to the extent that Congress has expressly waived the United States's sovt::reign immunity from 

suit. Lane v. Pena, 51S U.S. 187, 192 (1996). Although the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 

.Ij 
28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80, expressly waives the United States's sovereign immunity from 

suit for conspiracy and fraud in some circumstances, the FTC A expressly exempts "[a]ny claim 

arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission ofletters or postal matter." Id § 

2680(b). 

Because the complaint does not state a claim upon which relief may be granted, it will be 

dismissed. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

Date: ~W)/o 

Ut..,=, J ;-J~ United States District Judge 

- 2 -
Amendment Merk Investments Sponsor Trustee
 W I T N E S S E T H
 Trust Agreement Trust
 Marketing Agent Agreement Van Eck Shares
      1. Effective on April 28, 2016, the name of the Trust shall be “VanEck Merk Gold Trust” and all references to “Van Eck Merk Gold Trust” in the Trust Agreement shall be amended to read “VanEck Merk Gold Trust,” and the Shares shall be known as the “VanEck Merk Gold Shares.”
 2. In accordance with Section 6.1 of the Trust Agreement, the Sponsor hereby certifies to the Trustee that the provisions of this Amendment do not impose or increase any fees or charges relating to the Trust and do not otherwise prejudice any substantial existing right of
 -1-
 provided,
 3. This Amendment may be signed in counterparts and by computer scanned or facsimile transmission of an originally executed document, each of which when taken together shall constitute one agreement binding on all the parties notwithstanding that not all the parties are signatories to the same counterpart.
 4. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Trust Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
 5. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Amendment should be or become invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Amendment shall in no way be affected, prejudiced or disturbed thereby.
 6. This Amendment shall be interpreted under, and all rights and duties under this Amendment shall be governed by, the internal substantive laws (but not the choice of law rules) of the State of New York.
 7. Except as otherwise specified in this Amendment, or as the context may otherwise require, capitalized terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Trust Agreement.
 8. By entering into this Amendment, the Trust and the Trustee do not become parties to the Marketing Agent Agreement.  The Trustee does not hereby grant any consent, express or implied, or undertake to grant any consent, or make any agreement, other than as expressly provided herein.
   -2-





-3-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jimmy H. Manry, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 706]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Marianne Furfure, J.—Contempt, 1st Degree). Present—Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Scudder, Gorski, Centra and Green, JJ.
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Alan D. Gordon, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Shelley Goff, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:August 12, 2010By:/s/Alan D. GordonAlan D. Gordon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  Date:August 12, 2010By:/s/Shelley GoffShelley Goff, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
#### § 91.13 Health, sanitation, and sewerage disposal.

Health, sanitation, and sewerage disposal problems within the village reserves shall be subject to and controlled by applicable County and State laws.