alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Delphi Plan Documents and Processing Reports 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Delphi Plan Documents and Processing Reports

Final actuarial and asset evaluation reports and related documentation concerning the Delphi pension plans are listed below.

To request a benefit determination worksheet, please contact our Customer Contact Center at (800) 400-7242. For information on how participants can request a copy of their PBGC file, please see PBGC's Freedom of Information Act Guide.

**Asset Evaluation Documents**

Asset Evaluation Package for the Delphi Hourly and Salaried plans (includes 3 related documents):
                          -                              - Additional Supplemental Plan Asset Evaluation Report (December 4, 2015) (which summarizes the January 20, 2015 Track 1 Report and the May 19, 2015 Track 2 Report)
                            - Plan Asset Evaluation Report for the Delphi Salaried Plan and the Delphi Hourly Plan (a/k/a Track 1 Report). (January 30, 2015)
                            - Supplemental Plan Asset Evaluation Report for the Delphi Salaried Plan and the Delphi Hourly Plan (a/k/a Track 2 Report). (May 19, 2015) 

Plan Asset Evaluation Report for the Delphi Subsidiary Plans. (December 3, 2015)

**Recovery Valuation Documents**

Recovery Valuation and Allocation Memo for Delphi Corp. (November 6, 2014)

**Actuarial Case Report Documents** (Note: All personally identifiable information has been removed from these documents.)

The Delphi Actuarial Case Memo and Report (September 30, 2015) for the Delphi Salaried Plan

Actuarial Case Memo (July 1, 2015) for the PHI Non-Bargaining Plan

**Plan Documents**

Delphi Salaried Plan Document, Effective January 1, 1999

Delphi Salaried Plan Document, Restated October 1, 2008

PHI Non-Bargaining Retirement Plan, Effective January 1, 1996

June 5, 2020

##           Delphi Resources      

                                  - Delphi Home Page 
                                  - Latest Developments
                                  - Delphi FAQs - Hourly Plan
                                  - PBGC Payments and GM’s Top-Up
                                  - Delphi FAQs - Salaried Plan
                                  - Delphi Plans Processing Reports
                                  - Archived Delphi Information

##           Contact Us      

Visit our Contact Us page for more information.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Integrateddefense acquisition, technology, & logistics life cycle managementframework [graphic]**�** 
SuDocNumber: D 1.2:IN 8/13/2005
ItemNumber:0306(online)
CGPSystem Number: 000599206
 
Front
Back
 
 **
#### § 700.71 Improvements.

Improvements are structures and attached fixtures to the land owned by a member of a household required to relocate under the terms of the Act, in addition to the habitation which improvements cannot readily be moved without substantial damage, or whose movement would require unreasonable cost.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Información Sobre PBGC 
-  Seguro de Pensión de PBGC: Lo Tenemos Cubierto 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov’s English home page for more information available in English.

# Seguro de Pensión de PBGC: Lo tenemos cubierto

El Congreso estableció PBGC para asegurar las pensiones de beneficios definidos de los trabajadores estadounidenses. Los planes de pensión de beneficios definidos son pensiones tradicionales que pagan una cantidad determinada cada mes después de su jubilación. Si tiene una pensión de un empleo del sector privado, probablemente sea uno de los más de 31 millones de estadounidenses cubiertos por la protección del seguro de PBGC. PBGC asegura más de 24,500 planes de pensión.

## Encuentre su plan de pensión** **

PBGC asegura dos tipos de planes de pensión de beneficios definidos en dos programas de seguro separados. Busque Planes que Pagan las Primas de PBGC (página en inglés).

Además de nuestras herramientas de búsqueda de planes de pensión de empleadores únicos y de empleadores múltiples, también ofrecemos listas de ambos en formato Excel en nuestra página de Gobierno Abierto.

## Lo que PBGC no asegura

Si bien aseguramos la mayor parte de los planes de pensión del sector privado, el Congreso también ha definido excepciones que PBGC no asegura. Por ejemplo, PBGC no asegura: 
                          - las pensiones del gobierno federal, estatal y local/municipal
                          - las pensiones militares
                          - las pensiones asociadas con instituciones religiosas (incluidos hospitales y escuelas con afiliación religiosa)
                          - las pensiones para pequeñas prácticas profesionales (médico, abogado u otro profesional con menos de 25 empleados)
                          - los planes 401(k)
                          - IRAs
                          - los planes de participación en las ganancias
                          - los beneficios de salud
                          - los planes de acciones del empleado en la empresa (ESOPs)
                          - los planes de ahorro
                          - los planes de contribuciones fijas

## Más información

Para obtener más información sobre PBGC y su seguro de pensión, consulte estos recursos:
                          - Hoja informativa de Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation  
                          - Hoja informativa sobre las Garantías de PBGC para Planes de Pensión de Empleador Único
                          - Planes de Empleadores Múltiples
                          - Su Pensión Garantizada
                          - Hoja informativa sobre los Tipos de Terminaciones
                          - Hoja informativa sobre el Programa para Localizar a Participantes  (página en inglés)

Noviembre 16, 2023

Déjenos sus comentarios
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Michael O’Connell, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-200;

Second District

December 30, 1974.

Daniel Burke, of Kuhn & Geraghty, of Glen Ellyn, for appellant.

John J. Bowman, State’s Attorney, of Wheaton (Ralph J. Gust, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant, after being stopped by an officer monitoring a traffic radar unit, was cited for speeding and for driving while his license was suspended. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 95%, §§ 11 — 601(b) and 6 — 303(a), respectively.) After a bench trial, he was found guilty on both charges, fined $25 plus costs on the first and $100 plus costs on the second. A 7-day sentence in the county jail was imposed in accordance with the finding of guilt on the latter charge; sentence was suspended. Defendant appeals, claiming that it was prejudicial and reversible error to allow, over objection, the introduction of a certified copy of his driving abstract which *793contained evidence of two prior convictions for driving while his license was suspended.

 The same issue was passed upon by this court in *People v. Gathman,*12 Ill.App.3d 904 (1973). There, as here, the defendant cited *People v. Archibald,*3 Ill.App.3d 591, 594-595 (1972), as authority for his claim that evidence is incompetent where it tends to show the commission of other offenses unrelated to the offense with which defendant is charged. This court held that such rule related to jury trial, but that in bench trials, criminal and civil, the judge, as trier of fact, is presumed to have considered only such evidence as is competent. *People v. Gathman, supra,*and cases cited therein.

The State’s submitting into evidence a copy of a driving abstract which shows prior and various offenses is a practice to be discouraged. In a jury trial, such practice would be grounds for reversal even if the other entries on the abstract had been obliterated. *(People v. Archibald,*3 Ill.App.3d 591 (1972).) In a trial without a jury, the State is not relieved of observing fundamental fairness. It would, therefore, be the preferred practice for the State to obtain a certified driving abstract free of reference to any offenses unrelated to the charge.

In this case, defendant’s guilt was proven, without reliance on the driving abstract, by the unrebutted testimony of the police officer who related defendant’s admission to driving while his license was suspended.

Judgment affirmed.

SEIDENFELD and RECHENMACHER, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.42 Technical assistance. ( a ) Pre-award and ongoing technical assistance may be requested by an Indian tribe or off-reservation Indian organization from the appropriate agency or area office to which the tribe or organization will be submitting an application for funds under subparts C and D of this part. A request for pre-award technical assistance by an off-reservation Indian organization must be received by the Regional Director designated at § 23.11 for the state in which the applicant is located no later than 10 days prior to the application deadline to assure sufficient time for area response.
( b ) Pre-award and ongoing technical assistance may be provided by the appropriate BIA agency or area office for purposes of program planning and design, assistance in establishing internal program monitoring and evaluation criteria for ongoing grant administration and management, and for other appropriate assistance requested.
( c ) The area social services staff shall provide technical assistance to grantees upon receipt of an authorized request from the grantee or when review of the grantee's quarterly performance reports shows that: ( 1 ) An ICWA program is yielding results that are or will be detrimental to the welfare of the intended Indian beneficiaries of the program;
( 2 ) A program has substantially failed to implement its goals and objectives;
( 3 ) There are serious irregularities in the fiscal management of the grant; or
( 4 ) The grantee is otherwise deficient in its program performance.
( 5 ) Upon receiving an authorized request from the grantee, the area social services staff and/or grants officer shall provide the necessary technical assistance to arrive at mutually determined corrective action measures and their actual implementation, if necessary, and the timeframes within which said corrective actions will be implemented.
§ 166.204 Who may represent an individual Indian landowner in granting a permit? The following individuals or entities may represent an individual Indian landowner in granting a permit: ( a ) An adult with custody acting on behalf of their minor children;
( b ) A guardian, conservator, or other fiduciary appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to act on behalf of an individual Indian landowner;
( c ) An adult or legal entity who has been given a written power of attorney that: ( 1 ) Meets all of the formal requirements of any applicable tribal or state law;
( 2 ) Identifies the attorney-in-fact and the land to be permitted; and
( 3 ) Describes the scope of the power granted and any limits thereon.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# USS Mississippi Welcomed as Newest Member of Pacific Submarine Force

By Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Steven KhorCommander, Submarine Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs

                PEARL HARBOR  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Pacific Submarine Force

pacom

news

articles
#### Noel Blackman, Plaintiff, and Jaycinth Blackman, Appellant, v Norberto Rodriguez et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[823 NYS2d 673]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Jaycinth Blackman appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ayres, J.), entered June 14, 2005, as granted the cross motion of the defendants Norberto Rodriguez and Genco Auto Electric, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, *409on the law, with costs, and the cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Norberto Rodriguez and Genco Auto Electric, Inc. is denied.

The defendants Norberto Rodriguez and Genco Auto Electric, Inc., failed to make a prima facie showing that the injured plaintiff, Jaycinth Blackman, did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). Accordingly, it is unnecessary to reach the question of whether the plaintiff’s papers were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Coscia v 938 Trading Corp.,*283 AD2d 538 [2001]). Schmidt, J.E, Ritter, Mastro, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Amendment to the 2004 Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.10 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 THE 2004 LONG-TERM CASH INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The AnnTaylor Stores Corporation 2004 Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (“LTCIP”) is hereby amended effective as of March 13, 2008 (the
“Effective Date”) as set forth below. 
 Section 6(a) of the LTCIP is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 

“(a) Payment of an Award (if any) for a Performance Cycle will be made in cash promptly
following the end of the Performance Cycle to which it relates and following the certification by the Committee pursuant to Section 5(f) (but in no event later than the last day of the “applicable 2 1/2 month period”, as such term is defined in Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-1(b)(4)(i)(A)).” 
 Except as set forth above, the LTCIP is hereby ratified and affirmed in all respects.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Jones,
Jr., Chairman/CEO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on
         the Company.



/s/ ROBERT L. JONES
--------------------------------------
Robert L. Jones, Chairman/CEO
July 9, 2012

By Email

Esta Rosenberg, Chief

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Spirit Airlines Application for an Exemption, DFW-CUN

(DOT-OST-2012-0106)

Dear Ms. Rosenberg,

Spirit Airlines has completed its poll of the U.S. carriers served with its application of 

July 2, 2012 for an exemption pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 for service between Dallas/Ft. 

Worth, Texas (DFW) and Cancun, Mexico (CUN). 

Spirit received non-objections from each of the U.S. carriers served. We request 

expedited approval of our application.

Respectfully submitted,

 

David M. Kirstein 

cc: Service List
§ 126.11 Counsel. ( a ) ( 1 ) Parties to proceedings before a TSOB Review Panel may be represented by an attorney who is in good standing with the bar of any State, district, territory, or possession of the United States. Parties desiring representation must obtain such representation at their own expense.
( 2 ) TSA will designate counsel to represent TSA before a TSOB Review Panel. The attorney must hold a security clearance that enables access to all materials related to the appeal.
( b ) The General Counsel of the Department of Homeland Security, or the General Counsel's designee, will appoint legal counsel to assist a TSOB Review Panel. Counsel appointed to assist the TSOB Review Panel will facilitate communication between the TSOB Docket Clerk and the TSOB Review Panel, and assist with legal research and drafting for the Panel, as needed. Appointed counsel must hold a security clearance that enables access to all materials related to the appeal.
§ 700.341 Access to life estate leases. ( a ) Family members and other persons may enter upon the life estate lease premises for the purpose of visiting the life estate lease residents so long as such visit does not exceed thirty (30) consecutive days in any one visit or ninety (90) days total of all visits within any lease year, except that grandchildren and their descendants who are not minor dependents of the life tenant and who have not attained the age of 18 (eighteen) years may visit for ninety (90) consecutive days in any lease year, the first of which shall commence on the date of issuance of the life estate lease. There shall be no limitation on visits which do not extend overnight.
( b ) Visitors and residents shall use the existing road systems and access rights of way when traveling to and from life estate lease premises.
### §1795. Congressional findings

The Congress finds that the establishment of a National Credit Union Central Liquidity Facility is needed to improve general financial stability by meeting the liquidity needs of credit unions and thereby encourage savings, support consumer and mortgage lending, and provide basic financial resources to all segments of the economy.

(June 26, 1934, ch. 750, title III, formerly subch. III, §301, as added Pub. L. 95–630, title XVIII, §1802, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3719; amended Pub. L. 96–221, title III, §309(b)(1), Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 149.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 309(b)(1) of Pub. L. 96–221 redesignated subch. III as title III of act June 26, 1934, ch. 750, cited as a credit to this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 95–630, title XVIII, §1806, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3724, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter and amending section 1757 of this title, section 709 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 856 of former Title 31, Money and Finance] shall take effect on October 1, 1979."

#### Short Title

For short title of title XVIII of Pub. L. 95–630, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3719, as the "National Credit Union Central Liquidity Facility Act", see section 1801 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a Short Title of 1978 Amendment note under section 1751 of this title.
-90 -88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 42 44



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000

18 12 06 00 08/03 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
exv10w32






H. F. Lenfest


300 Barr Harbor Drive, Suite 460


Conshohocken, PA 19428




May 20, 2008




William F. Mitchell

Chief Executive Officer

Environmental Tectonics Corporation

County Line Industrial Park

Southampton, PA 18966



          Re: Commitment to Support Environmental Tectonics Corporation


Dear Bill:



     By way of this letter I hereby commit to fund all requests by ETC for funds to support its
operations through June 30, 2009, on terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon by me and ETC,
provided that ETC shall not request more than $10 million in the aggregate.



     All agreements will be subject to any required approvals including the approval of ETC’s
shareholders and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the American Stock Exchange, if
required. ETC’s objective will be to either replace or supplant any financing I provide with third
party commitments on a best efforts basis. However, in any case, I commit to provide ETC with
continuous access to funds, in some form, through June 30, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,
 
 
	 
	 	H. F. Lenfest
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-19 

February 6, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041(c) Termination by Plan Administrator. Inability to Determine Sufficiency

4048 Date of Termination 

OPINION: 

 This is in regard to the termination of the * * * Company Pension Plan (hereinafter "Plan"). 

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (hereinafter "PBGC" ) received two notices, dated January 6 and

February 20, 1975, of intent to terminate the Plan. We have determined that the Plan is a non-multiemployer plan subject

to the provisions of Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq.

(hereinafter "Act"). On January 26, 1976, the PBGC issued, pursuant to Act § 4041(c), 29 U.S.C. § 1341(c), a Notice

of Inability to Determine Sufficiency. Copies of the aforementioned notices are enclosed herewith. 

* * * President of * * * submitted a copy, enclosed herewith, of the * * * Company Board of Director's resolution

passed on December 15, 1974, which purpported to cease benefit accruals under, and contributions to, the Plan and

which purported to terminate the Plan. Pursuant to Act § 4048, 29 U.S.C. § 1348, the PBGC agrees that the information

submitted by * * * including the above-mentioned resolution, establishes the date of Plan termination [*2] as December

15, 1974. 

Please sign and date the copy of this letter enclosed herewith and return to the Office of the General Counsel, PBGC,

to acknowledge your agreement on December 15, 1974, as the termination date of the Plan. It is understood that your

agreement on the termination date of the Plan does not constitute in any manner a certification by you of the correctness

or accuracy of the aforementioned documents and notices. 

 Should you have any questions, please call * * * Case Officer, at * * * or * * * of the Office of the General Counsel

at * * * 

Steven E. Schanes 

Executive Director