alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1077

To dedicate the new Amtrak station in New York, New York, to Senator

Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 19, 1999

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mr. BYRD, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.

ROTH, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. WARNER, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. DODD,

Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. KERRY, Mr. REID, Mr. BRYAN,

Mr. ROBB, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. TORRICELLI,

and Mr. BAYH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To dedicate the new Amtrak station in New York, New

York, to Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN

4 STATION.

5 The Amtrak station to be constructed in the James

6 A. Farley Post Office Building in New York, New York,

7 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Daniel Patrick

8 Moynihan Station’’.
2

•S 1077 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Amtrak

4 station referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a

5 reference to the ‘‘Daniel Patrick Moynihan Station’’.

Æ
#### Hancock *v.*Estate of Delp.

[No. 12,262.

Filed July 1, 1925.]

From Parke Circuit Court; *Roy Baker,*Judge.

Action between Howard L. Hancock and the Estate of Juel Delp. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals. *Reversed.*By the court in banc.

*Elwood Hunt,*for appellant.

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed, without prejudice, on authority of *Rose*v. *Arford*(1909), 172 Ind. 269.
§ 41.35 What will happen if the Tribal college or university doesn't receive its appropriate share? ( a ) If the BIE determines the Tribal college or university has received financial assistance to which the Tribal college or university was not entitled, BIE will: ( 1 ) Promptly notify the Tribal college or university; and
( 2 ) Reduce the amount of the Tribal college's or university's payments under this subpart to compensate for any overpayments or otherwise attempt to recover the overpayments.
( b ) If a Tribal college or university has received less financial assistance than the amount to which the Tribal college or university was entitled, the Tribal college or university should promptly notify the BIE. If the BIE confirms the miscalculation, BIE will adjust the amount of the Tribal college's or university's payments for the same or subsequent academic years to compensate for the underpayments. This adjustment will come from the Department's general funds and not from future appropriated funds.
### [§2823. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–364, div. B, title XXVIII, §2803(a), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2467]

Section, added Pub. L. 97–214, §2(a), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 158; amended Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1041(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1885, related to determination of availability of suitable alternative housing for acquisition in lieu of construction of new family housing.
Attention: United States Secretary of Transportation 

Mr. Anthony R. Foxx 

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

United States

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act 

and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 

CFR 45.23(b); 14 CFR Part 21; 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b); 

91.7 (a); 91.9 (b) (2); 91.103 (b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 

91.151 (a); 91.203 (a) & (b); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.417 (a) & (b)

Dear Mr. Secretary, 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 CFR Part 11, 

The Edit Haus., a Georgia Limited Liability 

Corporation, and James C Suss, a licensed REALTOR in the State of 

Georgia with Harry Norman, Realtors, and owner of The Edit Haus LLC, 

and operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUASs”) 

equipped to conduct aerial photography for the education 

of real estate professionals and real estate marketing purposes, 

hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation 

Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its 

sUASs, so long as such operations are conducted within and 

under the conditions outlined herein or as may be 

established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

As described more fully below, the requested exemption 

would permit the operation of small, unmanned and relatively 

inexpensive sUAS under controlled conditions in airspace 

that is 1) limited 2) predetermined and 3) controlled as to 

access. Approval of this exemption would thereby fulfill the 

Secretary of Transportation’s (the responsibilities to 

“...establish requirements for the safe operation of such 

aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section

333 (c) of the Reform Act.
§ 158.502 Exemption from other laws regarding appointment. The provisions of the following laws, among other similar laws, do not apply under CTMS, to the DHS-CS, or to talent management involving the individuals described in § 158.103: ( a ) The following provisions of 5 U.S.C.: ( 1 ) Section 3320 regarding selection and appointment in the excepted service; and
( 2 ) Chapter 51 regarding classification; and
( b ) The following provisions of 5 CFR: ( 1 ) Part 211 regarding veteran preference;
( 2 ) Part 302 regarding employment in the excepted service (except § 302.203 regarding disqualifying factors);
( 3 ) Part 352 regarding reemployment rights (except subpart C regarding detail and transfer of Federal employees to international organizations); and
( 4 ) Part 511 regarding classification under the General Schedule.
#### § 170.1 What does this part do?

This part provides rules and references to the statutory funding formula for the Department of the Interior (DOI), in cooperation with the Department of Transportation (DOT), to implement the Tribal Transportation Program (TTP). Included in this part are references to other title 23 and title 25 transportation programs administered by the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) and the Secretary of Transportation (together, the “Secretaries”) and implemented by Tribes and Consortiums in accordance with the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 (ISDEAA), as amended, FHWA program agreements, and other appropriate agreements.
### §1715q. Delivery of statement of appraisal or estimates to home buyers

The Secretary is authorized and directed to require that in connection with any property upon which there is located a dwelling designed principally for a single-family residence or a two-family residence and which is approved for mortgage insurance under section 1709 or 1715e of  this  title  with  respect  to  any  property  or project of a corporation or trust of the character described in paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of section 1715e of this title, or sections 1715k, 1715l, 1715m,1 1715x, 1715y, 1715z(i), 1715z–2,1 or 1750b of this title, the seller or builder or such other person as may be designated by the Secretary shall agree to deliver, prior to the sale of the property, to the person purchasing such dwelling for his own occupancy, a written statement setting forth the amount of the appraised value of the property as determined by the Secretary. This section shall not apply in any case where the mortgage involved was insured or the commitment for such insurance was issued prior to August 2, 1954. Notwithstanding the first sentence of this section, the Secretary is authorized to require, in connection with any mortgage where the mortgage amount is computed on the basis of the Secretary's estimate of the replacement cost of the property, or on the basis of any other estimates of the Secretary, that a written statement setting forth such estimate or estimates, as the case may be, be furnished under this section in lieu of a written statement setting forth the amount of the appraised value of the property.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title II, §226, as added Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title I, §126, 68 Stat. 607; amended Pub. L. 85–104, title I, §115, July 12, 1957, 71 Stat. 298; Pub. L. 87–70, title VI, §612(j), June 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 182; Pub. L. 90–19, §1(a)(3), (4), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 17; Pub. L. 90–448, title I, §102(b), Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 486.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1715m of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 110–289, div. B, title I, §2120(a)(5), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2835.

Section 1715z–2 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 110–289, div. B, title I, §2120(a)(6), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2835.

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–448 inserted references to sections 1715z(i) and 1715z–2 of this title.

1967—Pub. L. 90–19 substituted "Secretary" for "Commissioner" wherever appearing, and "Secretary's" for "Commissioner's".

1961—Pub. L. 87–70 inserted references to sections 1715x and 1715y of this title, and substituted "or on the basis of any other estimates of the Commissioner, that a written statement setting forth such estimate or estimates, as the case may be," for "that a written statement setting forth such estimate".

1957—Pub. L. 85–104 inserted sentence authorizing estimate of replacement cost in lieu of an estimate of value where mortgage amount is based upon replacement cost.

1 See References in Text note below.
Exhibit 4.13b


 


CERTIFICATE
OF TRUST


OF


CT
PUBLIC PREFERRED TRUST III


 


This Certificate of Trust of CT Public Preferred Trust III (the “Trust”),
dated as of May 14, 2008, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware
Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801, et  seq.)(the “Act”).


 


1.             Name.  The name of the statutory trust being formed
hereby is CT Public Preferred Trust III.


 


2.             Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust, with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware, are BNYM
(Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.


 


3.             Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
as of its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate
of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act as of the date
first above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  GEOFFREY G. JERVIS, not in his individual 

  capacity, but solely as trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Geoffrey G. Jervis

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  BNYM (DELAWARE), not in its individual 

  capacity, but solely as trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ Kristine K. Gullo

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Kristine K. Gullo

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Vice President
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated March 3, 2015, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Property L.P., and certain other parties thereto, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Dated: March 9, 2017





/s/ Bryan K. DavisBryan K. DavisChief Financial Officer, Brookfield Property Group LLC
#### Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Fiest Friend.

Raii/road companies as common *carriers—when their liability as carriers ceases.*Carriers by railroad are neither bound to deliver the goods carried, to the consignee personally, nor to give notice of their arrival, to discharge their liability as carriers; but if the consignee is not present to receive the goods on their arrival, the carrier can store them safely in a suitable warehouse, to await the demand of the consignee; and when the goods are thus stored, the duty of the railroad, as a common carrier, terminates, and that of warehouseman begins.

Appeal' from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

Mr. John IST. Jewett, for the appellant.

Mr. Francis A. Riddle, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action brought against the railroad company to recover for goods destroyed by fire.

*304The property in question was loaded into a car of the Illinois Central Railroad Company, on the afternoon of October 4th, 1871, at Mattoon, Ill., consigned to the appellee at Chicago.

The car arrived in Chicago at about 4 o’clock in the afternoon of October 7th, 1871, which was Saturday; and by about 5 o’clock of that afternoon the goods had been unloaded and stored in a safe and suitable freight house of the company. On Monday morning, October 9th, 1871, between 5 and 6 o’clock, the freight house and contents, including the property in question, were destroyed by the great fire in Chicago.

The doctrine has been repeatedly declared by this court that carriers by railroad are neither .bound to deliver the goods carried, to the consignee personally, nor to give notice of their arrival, to discharge their liability as carriers; that if the consignee is not present to receive the goods on their arrival, the carrier can store the goods safely in a suitable warehouse, to await the demand of the consignee; and that when thus stored, the duty of the railroad as a common carrier terminates, and that of warehouseman begins. *Porter*v. *Chic. and R. I. R. Co.*20 Ill. 407; *Richards*v. *The Mich. S. and N. I. R. Co.*Id. 404; *C. and A. R. Co.*v. *Scott,*42 Id. 132; *The Merchants’ Dispatch Co.*v. *Hallock, ante.*p. 284.

The instruction given for the plaintiff below was in conflict with this rule. The 2d and 4th instructions asked for on behalf of the defendant were in accordance with such rule, but they were refused by the court.

For error in such giving and refusing of instructions, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
§ 83.21 What must a documented petition include? ( a ) The documented petition may be in any readable form and must include the following: ( 1 ) A certification, signed and dated by the petitioner's governing body, stating that it is the petitioner's official documented petition;
( 2 ) A concise written narrative, with citations to supporting documentation, thoroughly explaining how the petitioner meets each of the criteria in § 83.11, except the Congressional Termination Criterion (§ 83.11 (g))— ( i ) If the petitioner chooses to provide explanations of and supporting documentation for the Congressional Termination Criterion (§ 83.11 (g)), the Department will accept it; but
( ii ) The Department will conduct the research necessary to determine whether the petitioner meets the Congressional Termination Criterion (§ 83.11 (g)).
( 3 ) Supporting documentation cited in the written narrative and containing specific, detailed evidence that the petitioner meets each of the criteria in § 83.11;
( 4 ) Membership lists and explanations, including: ( i ) An official current membership list, separately certified by the petitioner's governing body, of all known current members of the petitioner, including each member's full name (including maiden name, if any), date of birth, and current residential address;
( ii ) A statement describing the circumstances surrounding the preparation of the current membership list;
( iii ) A copy of each available former list of members based on the petitioner's own defined criteria; and
( iv ) A statement describing the circumstances surrounding the preparation of the former membership lists, insofar as possible.
( b ) If the documented petition contains any information that is protectable under Federal law such as the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, the petitioner must provide a redacted version, an unredacted version of the relevant pages, and an explanation of the legal basis for withholding such information from public release. The Department will not publicly release information that is protectable under Federal law, but may release redacted information if not protectable under Federal law.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 556 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 260
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 556

                          [Report No. 106-759]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2000

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of July 19, 2000, providing 
for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany 
the bill (H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 
103(a)(1) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
2001, or any amendment reported in disagreement from a conference 
thereon.
                                                 House Calendar No. 260

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 556

                          [Report No. 106-759]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 18, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
### §§1716–1, 1716a. Repealed. Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title II, §206, 68 Stat. 622

Section 1716–1, acts Oct. 30, 1951, ch. 642, 65 Stat. 599; June 30, 1953, ch. 170, §14, 67 Stat. 125, related to special authority of the Federal National Mortgage Association to make advance commitments, under certain conditions, with respect to insured cooperative-housing mortgages under section 1715e of this title.

Section 1716a, act Sept. 1, 1951, ch. 378, title VI, §608(a), 65 Stat. 315, required that one of the persons constituting the Board of Directors of the Federal National Mortgage Association be appointed by the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs from among personnel of the Veterans' Administration.
No. 85246 p

. 1.r . • k 0, L. , SEP

•• c01; IN THE SUPREME COURT 1. 171TIE STATE OF NEVADA IN THI. ! MATTER P

# THE GUARDIANSHIP OF: NICHOLAS SARNELLI, PROTECTED PERSON. ANTHONY BARONE, jR., Appellant.
ORDER DISMISSINGAPPEAL

This appeal wasdocketed onAugust 30, 2022, withoutpayment ofth.e requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(0). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 14 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise :responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).

It is so ORDERED. CLERKOFTHE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A.BROWN

CC: Hon. Linda Marquis, District Judge, Family Court Division Anthony Barone, jr. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 1.47 

# Z2-3\ oo-6
EXHIBIT 32.3

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patricia E. Jones,
Secretary/Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on
         the Company.



/s/ PATRICIA E. JONES
-------------------------------------------
Patricia E. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer
#### § 61.15 Special instructions.

To facilitate the work of the Director or Superintendent, the Assistant Secretary may issue special instructions not inconsistent with the regulations in this part 61.
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                        Certification of CEO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penton Media, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas L. Kemp,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

               (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.


 /s/  THOMAS L. KEMP
----------------------
Thomas L. Kemp

Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

November 14, 2002









                                       66
#### § 582.4 Are motions permitted?

Ordinance appeals are summary proceedings. Only motions for extension of time under § 580.4(f) of this subchapter, motions for limited participation under § 582.5, motions to supplement the record under § 581.5 of this subchapter, and motions for reconsideration under § 581.6 of this subchapter, are permitted.