alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! ! )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! ! !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! ! "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! ! #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! ! $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! ! %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! ! &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! ! '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! ! (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! " )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! " !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! " "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! " #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! " $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! " %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! " &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! " '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! " (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! # )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! # !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! # "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! # #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! # $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! # %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! # &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! # '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! # (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! $ )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! $

1 . * 4 5 ' . 1 . 6

0 6 7 6

8 9 . ' 7! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 . 1 2 . ' 3

, 3 ! $ !

: . ; ( < = . >

? @ A B > C > ? A D E F C > B F G C A H A C C I D > ? @ C I F I ? ? > C E E J K ? I F E F J

? @ & # ! A B K > ? > ? - ? A D E F @ G I L G - - E G I M @ ? I I N J E - A E O

O > - A ? H E F > L I
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-18 

June 29, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

4044 Allocation of Assets

4044(d)(1) Allocation of Assets. Distribution of Residual Assets to Employer 

OPINION: 

 This is in reference to the distribution of the Plan's excess assets attributable to employer contributions. As we

understand it, the Plan terminated on September 12, 1980, and the Plan's assets are more than sufficient to pay all Plan

benefits through Category 6 of Section 4044 of ERISA and all other Plan liabilities. 

Section 4044(d)(1) provides: 

Any residual assets of a single employer plan may be distributed to the employer if-- 

(A) all liabilities of the plan to participants and their beneficiaries have been satisfied, 

(B) the distribution does not contravene any provision of law, and 

(C) the plan provides for such a distribution in these circumstances. 

The Plan was amended in 1976 to provide that "after satisfaction of all obligations to persons entitled to benefits

upon termination of the Plan, any funds or property remaining in the Fund shall revert to the Company so long as such

distribution to the Company does not contravene any statute." Thus, the Plan appears to permit a reversion as provided

in Section 4044(d)(1)(C), [*2] although we express no opinion as to whether such distribution contravenes any other

provision of law. Accordingly, PBGC has no objection to the reversion of excess assets attributable to employer

contributions to the Company. Further, we express no opinion as to whether participants may have any rights, under laws

not administered by PBGC, to excess assets attributable to employer contributions in view of prior provisions of the Plan

which restrict the employer's power to amend the Plan. 

Please contact * * * (202) 254-4895 if you have any questions. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
```

EX-33.8
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, MN 55414

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Management of the Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services
division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regard
to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government
(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Period:  As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the "Period").

Applicable Servicing Criteria:

The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and
1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Management of
the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company's management provides
the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

1. The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company management has assessed the Company compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to management's assertion of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association

By:    /s/ Shari Gillund
       Shari L. Gillund

Title: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 15, 2013

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.83 Assistance in locating biological parents of Indian child after termination of adoption.

Upon the request of a child placement agency, the court or an Indian tribe, the Secretary or his/her designee shall assist in locating the biological parents or prior Indian custodians of an adopted Indian child whose adoption has been terminated pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 1914. Such requests for assistance should be sent to the Regional Director designated in § 23.11(c).
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.87 How does an Indian tribe or tribal organization obtain title to property furnished by the Federal government for use in the performance of a contract or grant agreement pursuant to section 105(f)(2)(A) of the Act? ( a ) For government-furnished personal property made available to an Indian tribe or tribal organization before October 25, 1994: ( 1 ) The Secretary, in consultation with each Indian tribe or tribal organization, shall develop a list of the property used in a self-determination contract.
( 2 ) The Indian tribe or tribal organization shall indicate any items on the list to which the Indian tribe or tribal organization wants the Secretary to retain title.
( 3 ) The Secretary shall provide the Indian tribe or tribal organization with any documentation needed to transfer title to the remaining listed property to the Indian tribe or tribal organization.
( b ) For government-furnished real property made available to an Indian tribe or tribal organization before October 25, 1994: ( 1 ) The Secretary, in consultation with the Indian tribe or tribal organization, shall develop a list of the property furnished for use in a self-determination contract.
( 2 ) The Secretary shall inspect any real property on the list to determine the presence of any hazardous substance activity, as defined in 41 CFR 101-47.202.2(b)(10). If the Indian tribe or tribal organization desires to take title to any real property on the list, the Indian tribe or tribal organization shall inform the Secretary, who shall take such steps as necessary to transfer title to the Indian tribe or tribal organization.
( c ) For government-furnished real and personal property made available to an Indian tribe or tribal organization on or after October 25, 1994: ( 1 ) The Indian tribe or tribal organization shall take title to all property unless the Indian tribe or tribal organization requests that the United States retain the title.
( 2 ) The Secretary shall determine the presence of any hazardous substance activity, as defined in 41 CFR 101-47.202.2(b)(10).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 559 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 262
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 559

                          [Report No. 106-766]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 
 103(a)(1) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
                                 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2000

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 
 103(a)(1) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
                                 2001.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 103(a)(1) of 
the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2001. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read.
    Sec. 2. House Resolution 556 is laid on the table.

                                                 House Calendar No. 262

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 559

                          [Report No. 106-766]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 
 103(a)(1) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
                                 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 19, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Basic Requirements for Fully Wrapped Carbon-Fiber Reinforced Aluminum Lined Cyl...                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Basic Requirements for Fully Wrapped Carbon-Fiber Reinforced Aluminum Lined Cylinders PDF                   

# Basic Requirements for Fully Wrapped Carbon-Fiber Reinforced Aluminum Lined Cylinders

This is the basis requirements (standard) by OHM for design, construction and manufacturing fully wrapped carbon-fiber reinforced cylinders (CFFC).

**Key Words:** carbon composite, aluminum liner, resins, autofrettage, composite cylinder, aluminum liner, fiber stress, burst, burst ratio, test pressure, cycling test, CFFC

----

If you have any **technical questions** not addressed by this or associated documents, contact Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Charles A. French, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, that:

|  | 1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  

|   |   |   |                                                                             |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ CHARLES FRENCH                                                               |
|   |   |   |                                                                                  |
|   |   |   | **Charles A. French****Chief Executive Officer and President****August 8, 2003** |
H. Res. 88

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 2, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he

is hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr.

Isakson.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Isakson.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 581 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 20, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 3986) to provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a water 
exchange in lieu of electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser 
Diversion Dam, Washington. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. 
The amendment recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill 
shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 
except one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources and one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

## Related Documents

                  -                                          PD-25R Decision                   

# PD-25(R): Missouri prohibition of recontainerization of hazardous waste at transfer facility
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS80070 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# C_2006326EN.01003201.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/32

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 18 October 2006 — Comunidad Autónoma de Castilla y León v Juntas Generales de Guipúzcoa, Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

(Case C-432/06)

(2006/C 326/66)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Comunidad Autónoma de Castilla y León

Applicant:

Defendants: Juntas Generales de Guipúzcoa, Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

Defendants:

Questions referred

Must Article 87(1) EC be construed as meaning that, by providing for a rate of tax lower than the basic rate set in Spanish State legislation and for a deduction from the amount of tax payable which does not exist in State tax legislation, provisions in the field of taxation adopted by the Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Gipuzkoa amending Articles 29(1)(a) and 37 of the Provincial Law on Company Tax, which take effect in the jurisdiction of that infra-State autonomous body, must be regarded as selective and as covered by the definition of State aid enshrined in Article 87(1) EC and, accordingly, must be notified to the Commission pursuant to Article 88(3) EC?

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.12 Are the proposal contents requirements the same for renewal of a contract that is expiring and for securing an annual funding agreement after the first year of the funding agreement?

No. In these situations, an Indian tribe or tribal organization should submit a renewal proposal (or notification of intent not to renew) or an annual funding agreement proposal at least 90 days before the expiration date of the contract or existing annual funding agreement. The proposal shall provide funding information in the same detail and format as the original proposal and may also identify any significant proposed changes.
§ 166.317 What happens to improvements constructed on Indian lands when the permit has been terminated? ( a ) If improvements are to be constructed on Indian land, the permit must contain a provision that improvements will either: ( 1 ) Remain on the land upon termination of the permit, in a condition that is in compliance with applicable codes, to become the property of the Indian landowner; or
( 2 ) Be removed and the land restored within a time period specified in the permit. The land must be restored as close as possible to the original condition prior to construction of such improvements. At the request of the permittee we may, at our discretion, grant an extension of time for the removal of improvements and restoration of the land for circumstances beyond the control of the permittee.
( b ) If the permittee fails to remove improvements within the time allowed in the permit, the permittee may forfeit the right to remove the improvements and the improvements may become the property of the Indian landowner or at the request of the Indian landowner, we will apply the bond for the removal of the improvement and restoration of the land.
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.606

## Section §107.606: Exceptions

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.606 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses