alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



---

Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William A. Donius, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                       |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2005 |  | /s/ William A. Donius
|                     |  | Name:                 |  | William A. Donius                              
|                     |  | Title:                |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 10.2****PENTON MEDIA, INC.****SENIOR MANAGERS — SALE BONUSES**     The Board has previously determined that the Corporation should explore strategicalternatives, including a sale of the Corporation. Consequently, the Compensation Committee,comprised of members of the Board, has recommended that the Corporation establish an arrangement tocompensate certain senior managers of the Corporation (see tables below) with sale bonuses, in theevent that the strategic process is not terminated by the Board, and results in a sale of theCorporation (which may include a sale of a controlling interest in the Corporation).     The Corporation will pay the following individual a cash bonus if the strategic processresults in a sale of the Corporation:     **Name** **Sale Bonus**David Nussbaum $400,000      The Corporation will pay a variable cash bonus to the following individuals if the strategicProcess results in a sale of the Corporation:     Darrell Denny     Eric Shanfelt     Jim Ogle     Preston Vice     The variable cash bonus paid to the above individuals will be based on the sale proceedsdistributable to holders of the Corporation’s Series C Preferred Stock and common stock that resultfrom the sale of the Corporation as outlined in the following bonus schedule:     **Equity proceeds from sale of company** **Sale Bonus**Less than $135,000,000 $25,000 $135,000,000 or more but less than $145,000,000 $50,000 $145,000,000 or more but less than $185,000,000 $100,000 $185,000,000 or greater $150,000
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 5, 2019

t0329 

# Order

Clerk April 5, 2019

156193

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156193

COA: 337882

Kent CC: 16

- 002013

- FC

DANIEL ESTEBAN BENAVIDES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2017 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active duty accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense

(a) Guidance for Timely Consideration and Action.—The Secretary concerned may provide guidance, within guidelines provided by the Secretary of Defense, for commanders regarding their authority to make a timely determination, and to take action, regarding whether a member of the armed forces serving on active duty who is alleged to have committed an offense under section 920, 920b, 920c, or 930 of this title (article 120, 120b, 120c, or 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or an attempt to commit such an offense as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) should be temporarily reassigned or removed from a position of authority or from an assignment, not as a punitive measure, but solely for the purpose of maintaining good order and discipline within the member's unit.

(b) Time for Determination.—A determination described in subsection (a) may be made at any time after receipt of notification of an unrestricted report of a sexual assault or other sex-related offense that identifies the member as an alleged perpetrator.

(Added Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title XVII, §1713(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 963; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, §1071(f)(8), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3510; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1081(c)(2)(B), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1599.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 674 was renumbered section 12306 of this title.

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–91 substituted "920b, 920c, or 930" for "920a, 920b, 920c, or 925" and "120b, 120c, or 130" for "120a, 120b, 120c, or 125".

2014—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted "after receipt" for "afer receipt".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2017 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–91 effective immediately after the amendments made by div. E (§§5001–5542) of Pub. L. 114–328 take effect as provided for in section 5542 of that Act (10 U.S.C. 801 note) [amendments effective Jan. 1, 2019], see section 1081(c)(4) of Pub. L. 115–91, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
# C_2013180EN.01001401.xml

| 26.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/14

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 180/07

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Alghero–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | A period of 4 years starting on 27 October 2013 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained | For further information, please contact:





  Regione Autonoma della Sardegna |
| Assessorato dei trasporti |
| Via XXIX Novembre 41 |
| 09123 Cagliari CA |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0706067308 |
| Fax +39 0706067338 |
| E-mail: trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it |
| Internet: http://www.regione.sardegna.it |
| http://www.mit.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Alghero–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

A period of 4 years starting on 27 October 2013

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

Regione Autonoma della Sardegna

Assessorato dei trasporti

Via XXIX Novembre 41

09123 Cagliari CA

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0706067308

Fax +39 0706067338

E-mail: trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it

Internet: http://www.regione.sardegna.it

http://www.mit.gov.it

---
§ 37.100 What is the purpose of this part? ( a ) This part: ( 1 ) Establishes procedures for confirming, establishing, or revising attendance areas for each Bureau-funded school;
( 2 ) Encourages consultation with and coordination between and among all agencies (school boards, tribes, and others) involved with a student's education; and
( 3 ) Defines how tribes may develop policies regarding setting or revising geographic attendance boundaries, attendance, and transportation funding for their area of jurisdiction.
( b ) The goals of the procedures in this part are to: ( 1 ) Provide stability for schools;
( 2 ) Assist schools to project and to track current and future student enrollment figures for planning their budget, transportation, and facilities construction needs;
( 3 ) Adjust for geographic changes in enrollment, changes in school capacities, and improvement of day school opportunities; and
( 4 ) Avoid overcrowding or stress on limited resources.
### ])o\-oSI-Jrx>d-- 139"63

# GRAN~ ISLAND

.**~hi&** 

# CHAMBER RESOLUTION**/A~~:~~** WHEREAS, reHable, affordable air service is critical to the future growth and development ofthe central Nebraska area; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Essential Air Service (EAS) program was Implemented to ensure that small communities retain a minimal level ofscheduled airservice and accomplishes this by subsidizing the cost ofair service; and WHEREAS, the Central Nebraska Regional Airport is eligible for Essential Air Service subsidies through the U.S. Department ofTransportation; and WHEREAS, American Airlines, through its regional carrierAmerican Eagle, was selected to provide daily.non-stop airservice from Grand Island to Dallas/Fort Worth in 2012 and provides travelers with the abilitytoconnect toflights throughout the United States as well as internationallyto South America, Asia and Europe; and WHEREAS, in 2014, nearly 23,000 passengers utilized theAmerican Eagle flights serving Dallas/Fort Worth which is 39% ofall flights intoor out ofthe Central Nebraska Regional Airport; and WHEREAS, in 2015, the U.S. Department ofTransportation requested bids for Essential Air Service (EAS) flights for the Central Nebraska Regional Airport, and through its regional carrierAmerican Eagle, American Airlines submitted the lone bid ; and WHEREAS, the bid from American Airlines requested a federal subsidy in the amount of $1,270,707, a decrease of$565,000 to continue the Dallas/Fort Worth flights for 2015 and 2016 and; WHEREAS, the Department ofTransportation will, following inputfrom the Grand Island community, issue a decision designating the successful air carrier and specifying the airservice provided. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE GRAND ISLAND AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, that the U.S. Department of Transportation be encouraged to accept the bid ofAmerican Airlines, throughits regional carrier, American Eagle, as the Essential Air Service provider for the Central Nebraska Regional Airport.
Adopted this 11thdayofMarch, 2015

BOARD OF DIRECTORS GRAND ISLAND AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
Certified by its Board Chair and President
### Regu [atory Evaluation Docket No
. FAll.- 

# 'J-o 1s- -c 

# c -Oll-0 - 

# AD Directorate Identifier: -1\-8 .1cld tft t' mJrf... / ; ou/'1'. fJ<Irts cust, 

### .111d 111 11111>(.·r ot' I · S. l' <';.!i'lleredJ'l'llci/IU I to t/;, • l•t hl< 

### h,-/o 11 . II 

## It ,.,, \ ' o/1 ure !i!ll\hl'd • /i, 

### · I. oii/!J,· ·I ild,lil' Fieftf,
.. hutfou ;u Cllllu!l/cl/ludh'.fi/1 ill ill· /o!rd\ 

### U

pd ate Fields =-j

_ __ _ Estimated Costs: Action C os ts per Prod uct ( e.g., aircraft, eng ine. (e.g .• Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Tot al Co sts Number of Total Cost repl ac ement) (include cost (labor -t 

## u .s. for U.S. Fleet Do nm include onco ndition costs her e access, tes ting , ( @$ 85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products



# - - - ---- · - 

# - - In s pec tio n o f all elevator. rudder. ail e ron. and ai leron-to-ruddeer 100 0 

### 0 

### inter connect pri m ary control cables Rep lac ement of a ll elev ator, rudder, ai le ron. and ailcron-to

- rudd ccr 180 18 , 800 0 

### inte rconnect primary contro l cab l es Check (set) flight con t rol cable 25 

### 0 

### 0 ten s ion



## _ _ L_



# - - - ----·-



# ·- - · -- ---- - - -- 9

# I I I I The known number of product s in compliance : 

### ' , . 

### .. Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: 

# s 0 Cos ts covered under warranty 

### (if/mown) $ :. . 

## . . ' On-Condition Costs: 

# e Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost C ost per Product (e.g .. In spection. (incl ude access. (@$85/hour) testin g. and close- replacement) up)



### · - 

## - - I-- 

### Special co nsi derations for Economic Analysis (Use this.field to exp lain anything in the F.stimated Costs 1ah/ e 1hat was assumed or might not be obvious. This .field can also be used lo explain warranty costs): 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the



# ~D be con s idered a "significant regulatory action''? 

# G YES* 

### 0 NO (8) *Exp lanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedur es : 

### I s the 

### AD significant?



# ~ YES* 

### 0 NO 

### 181 *Explanation: 

### RegulatOJ1 ' Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a sig nifica nt econ omic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for ei ther a Yes o r No an s wer. 

# 0 YES 

### ::J NO 

### 181 Explanation: 

### Intrastate A\ • iati o n in Alas ka: This AD could affect intrastate aviation i n Alaska
. 

### Is it appropriate to include specific requirement s for aircraft operated in A laska where av iation m ight be the only mode of transportation? 

## @ YES* 

### 0 NO (8) * E xplanation:



### 10
Exhibit 33.3  LOGOPerpetual TrusteeCompany LimitedABN 42 000 001 007Level 12
Angel Place123 Pitt Street SydneyGPO Box 4172Sydney NSW 2001AustraliaDX 365 SydneyTelephone 02 9229 9000
Facsimile 02 8256 1422
 June 21, 2019 Management Assessment Management of Perpetual Trustee
Company Limited (the Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii) and 1122(d)(3)(iv) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange
Commission as of and for the year ended March 31, 2019. The transactions covered by this report include asset-backed securities transactions listed in Appendix B that are backed by lease contracts, hire purchase contracts and loan contracts in
relation to motor vehicle assets and that were registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and in respect of which publicly issued asset-backed securities remain outstanding as of the year
ended March 31, 2019 for which the Company served as issuer trustee (the Platform). Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company because the Company does not perform activities
with respect to the Platform relating to those criteria. The Companys management has assessed the Companys compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2019. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, except those criteria
listed as Inapplicable Servicing Criteria in Appendix A. as they are inapplicable to the Company based on the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2019. the Company has complied in all material respects with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the Platform. KPMG.
an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to Managements Assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2019.  /s/ Hagbarth StromHagbarth StromSenior Securitisation Manager Debt Markets
ServicesJune 21, 2019




---

Appendix A  Inapplicable Servicing Criteria under Item 1122(D) of Regulation AB  Item 1122(d)(1)(i)Item 1122(d)(l)(ii)Item 1122(d)(l)(iii)Item 1122(d)(l)(iv)Item 1122(d)(l)(v)Item 1122(d)(2)(i)Item 1122(d)(2)(iii)Item 1122(d)(2)(iv)Item 1122(d)(2)(v)Item 1122(d)(2)(vi)Item 1122(d)(2)(vii)Item 1122(d)(3)(i)Item 1122(d)(4)(i)Item 1122(d)(4)(ii)Item 1122(d)(4)(iii)Item 1122(d)(4)(iv)Item 1122(d)(4)(v)Item 1122(d)(4)(vi)Item 1122(d)(4)(vii)Item 1122(d)(4)(viii)Item 1122(d)(4)(ix)Item 1122(d)(4)(x)Item 1122(d)(4)(xi)Item 1122(d)(4)(xii)Item 1122(d)(4)(xiii)Item 1122(d)(4)(xiv)Item 1122(d)(4)(xv)  2




---

Appendix B  

SMART ABS Series 2016-2US Trust  3
§ 17.110 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* If the designated agency official finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, such recipient shall take such remedial action as the designated agency official deems necessary to overcome the effects of such discrimination.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* In the absence of a finding of discrimination on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, a recipient may take affirmative action consistent with law to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation therein by persons of a particular sex. Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted to alter any affirmative action obligations that a recipient may have under Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12086, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* Each recipient education institution shall, within one year of March 6, 2003: ( 1 ) Evaluate, in terms of the requirements of these Title IX regulations, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof concerning admission of students, treatment of students, and employment of both academic and non-academic personnel working in connection with the recipient's education program or activity;
( 2 ) Modify any of these policies and practices that do not or may not meet the requirements of these Title IX regulations; and
( 3 ) Take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted or may have resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( d ) *Availability of self-evaluation and related materials.* Recipients shall maintain on file for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c) of this section, and shall provide to the designated agency official upon request, a description of any modifications made pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section and of any remedial steps taken pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CFO CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), Carter D. Hicks, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Digital River, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

**1.    **The Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, and towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and

 

**2.    **The informationcontained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiods presented therein.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 9thday of November 2004.

 
|   |   |   |   | /s/ Carter  D. Hicks                   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   | Carter D. HicksChief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital River,Inc. and will be retained by Digital River, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# C_2006196EN.01000101.xml

| 19.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 August 2006

(2006/C 196/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2802 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4614 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68035 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2085 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5818 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0720 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5759 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,089 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,01 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8877 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5267 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,60 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,533 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8460 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6879 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4372 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9524 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0005 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0145 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 227,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,8225 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2090 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2850 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 605,65 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,699 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,444 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2490 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,084 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2802

JPY

Japanese yen

148,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4614

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68035

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2085

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5818

ISK

Iceland króna

88,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0720

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5759

CZK

Czech koruna

28,089

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,01

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8877

RON

Romanian leu

3,5267

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,60

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,533

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8460

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6879

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4372

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9524

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0005

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0145

KRW

South Korean won

1 227,20

ZAR

South African rand

8,8225

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2090

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2850

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 605,65

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,699

PHP

Philippine peso

65,444

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2490

THB

Thai baht

48,084

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---