alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Publications             
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeTopicsReporting Suspicious Activity

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 517.1 General provisions.

This part contains the regulations the National Indian Gaming Commission (Commission) follows in implementing the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. These regulations provide procedures by which you may obtain access to records compiled, created, and maintained by the Commission, along with procedures the Commission must follow in response to such requests for records. These regulations should be read together with the FOIA, which provides additional information about access to records maintained by the Commission. Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552(a), are processed in accordance with the Commission's Privacy Act regulations, 25 CFR part 515, as well as under this part.
§ 20.502 Can Child Assistance funds be used to place Indian children in residential care facilities? You, the social service program, can use Child Assistance funds to purchase or contract for room and board in licensed residential care facilities. ( a ) You can use Child Assistance funds to pay only for room and board. You must pay for other services that may be needed, including mental health, education, and physical therapy from other sources.
( b ) Before placement the various funding sources must sign an agreement that specifies the services each source will pay. The Bureau Line Officer must approve this agreement.
### §1190. Contents of plan

A plan filed under this subchapter—

(1) shall include—

(A) a brief history of the business operations of the debtor;

(B) a liquidation analysis; and

(C) projections with respect to the ability of the debtor to make payments under the proposed plan of reorganization;

(2) shall provide for the submission of all or such portion of the future earnings or other future income of the debtor to the supervision and control of the trustee as is necessary for the execution of the plan; and

(3) notwithstanding section 1123(b)(5) of this title, may modify the rights of the holder of a claim secured only by a security interest in real property that is the principal residence of the debtor if the new value received in connection with the granting of the security interest was—

(A) not used primarily to acquire the real property; and

(B) used primarily in connection with the small business of the debtor.

(Added Pub. L. 116–54, §2(a), Aug. 23, 2019, 133 Stat. 1082.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Aug. 23, 2019, see section 5 of Pub. L. 116–54, set out as an Effective Date of 2019 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Devon Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 19, 2013
By:
/s/ Devon JonesDevon Jones

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank
National Association.



By:

/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 19, 2016
# C_2006212EN.01003102.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/31

---

Action brought on 29 June 2006 — Alrosa v Commission

(Case T-170/06)

(2006/C 212/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Alrosa Company Ltd. (Mirny, Russia) (represented by: R. Subiotto, S. Mobley, K. Jones, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision in its entirety;

| — | order the Commission to pay Alrosa's legal and other costs and expenses in relation to this matter. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay Alrosa's legal and other costs and expenses in relation to this matter.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contests the Commission's decision of 22 February 2006, by which the Commission made binding upon De Beers a commitment to phase out between 2006 and 2008 and to cease as from 1 January 2009 all direct and indirect purchases of rough diamonds from the applicant.

In support of its application, the applicant invokes, first, a violation of its right to be heard in the procedure leading to the decision. The applicant submits that the Commission was required to explain which third party observations and what aspects of the Commission's analysis justified the rejection of the commitments originally proposed jointly by De Beers and the applicant and the adoption of the final commitments proposed by De Beers.

Second, the applicant invokes a violation of Article 9 of Regulation 1/2003 in that the commitments made binding by the contested decision were offered only by De Beers, rather than by the undertakings concerned, namely De Beers and the applicant. The applicant adds that the contested decision has not been adopted for a specified period.

Finally, the applicant submits that the contested decision's absolute and potentially indefinite prohibition on De Beers' purchasing rough diamonds directly or indirectly from the applicant violates Article 82 EC and Article 9 of Regulation 1/2003, as well as the fundamental principles of freedom of contract and proportionality.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
of Penton Media, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, that the Company's
quarterly report for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") that to his
knowledge:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


Dated:  October 13, 2005                   /s/ David B. Nussbaum
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           David B. Nussbaum
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Preston L. Vice
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Preston L. Vice
                                           Chief Financial Officer
IV

House Calendar No. 149

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 358

[Report No. 106–443]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 75) making

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

75) making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J.

4 Res. 75) making further continuing appropriations for the

5 fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes. The joint resolu6 tion shall be considered as read for amendment. The pre7 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the joint
2

HRES 358 RH

1 resolution to final passage without intervening motion ex2 cept: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled

3 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

4 Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to re5 commit.

House Calendar No. 149

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 358

[Report No. 106–443]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 75) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for otherpurposes.

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### §1191. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–230, §24, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 466

Section, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title II, §204, 42 Stat. 1464, related to restrictions on amount of indebtedness and on advances, etc., to single persons and on dealings in livestock.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 516
          - [Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0534]
          - RIN 0910-AG58

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is confirming the effective date of March 30, 2011, for the final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of November 15, 2010 (75 FR 69586). The direct final rule amends the regulations regarding new animal drugs for minor use and minor species (MUMS) to update language and clarify the intent of the regulations consistent with the preambles to the proposed and final rules. This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule.                    

# DATES:

Effective date confirmed: March 30, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Meg Oeller, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-50), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240-276-9005,                         *e-mail: margaret.oeller@fda.hhs.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of November 15, 2010 (75 FR 69586), FDA solicited comments concerning the direct final rule for a 75-day period ending January 31, 2011. FDA stated that the effective date of the                           ( print page 11332)                        direct final rule would be on March 30, 2011, 60 days after the end of the comment period, unless any significant adverse comment was submitted to FDA during the comment period. FDA did not receive any significant adverse comments.                

Authority:21 U.S.C. 360ccc-1, 360ccc-2, 371. Accordingly, the amendments issued thereby are effective.

Dated: February 24, 2011.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4593 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
[Exhibit 99.4]

                          CERTIFICATION
                          -------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Donald L. Kolasch, President, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on
the Company.



By: /s/ Donald L. Kolasch, President
------------------------------------
May 20, 2003
-  Home 

# Approvals Standard Operating Procedure

Approvals Program SOP_6.30.2011.pdf (459.49 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
St. Mary's Cement SNCR Cost Effectiveness Calculations Capital Costs Purchased Equipment Company, from Environ Report,

SNCR 1,371,630 $ inc. $400,000 for winterizing Instrumentation 10% 137,163 $ OAQPS CCM Freight 5% 68,582 $ OAQPS CCM Subtotal P.E.C. 1,577,375 $ InstallationFoundations 12% 189,285 $ Handling, erection 40% 630,950 $ Electrical 1% 15,774 $ Piping 30% 473,212 $ Insulation 1% 15,774 $ Painting 1% 15,774 $ Subtotal, Inst. 85% 1,340,768 $ Indirect Costs

Engineering 10% 157,737 $ Construction, Field 10% 157,737 $ Contractor fees 10% 157,737 $ Start-up 1% 15,774 $ Performance test 1% 15,774 $ Contingencies 3% 47,321 $ 552,081 $ Total Direct Costs 3,470,224 $

Annual Costs OperatingOperator 1/2 hr/shift $25.38 12,690 $ Supervisor15% of operator 1,904 $ Reagent 1,440,000 $ Company estimate; see notes

$450/ton pure urea, 40% control Maintenance

Labor 1/2 hr/shift, 8000 hr 8,885 $ Materials100% of maint. Labor 8,885 $ Electricity$0.07/kW-hr, 100kW 28,000 $ "Cooler season" 4000 hours(No production losses - see notes)

Total Direct Annual (Maint+Operating) 1,500,364 $ Indirect Annual Costs

Overhead60% of O+M - Elec

- $ OAQPS CCM Administrative 2% of TCI 69,404 $ Property Tax (not allowed in MI) Insurance 1% of TCI 34,702 $ Capital Recovery 11% 381,031 $ 7% over 15 years Subtotal, IAC 485,137 $ Total Annual Cost: DC + IAC 1,985,501 $ Cost Effectiveness Tons 229640% of 5741

$/ton 865

$
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.246 What does reassumption mean?

Reassumption means rescission, in whole or in part, of a contract and assuming or resuming control or operation of the contracted program by the Secretary without consent of the Indian tribe or tribal organization. There are two types of reassumption: emergency and non-emergency.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 619

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States

Postal Service should issue a postage stamp commemorating the Pulitzer

Prize winning author Edna Ferber.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 10, 2000

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the United States Postal Service should issue a postage

stamp commemorating the Pulitzer Prize winning author

Edna Ferber.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 issue a postage stamp commemorating the Pulitzer

5 Prize winning author Edna Ferber; and
2

•HRES 619 IH

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

3 such a postage stamp be issued.

Æ
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—MISCELLANEOUS
### §9273. Distinguished-service medal: award

The President may award a distinguished-service medal of appropriate design and a ribbon, together with a rosette or other device to be worn in place thereof, to a person who, while serving in any capacity with the Air Force or the Space Force, distinguishes himself by exceptionally meritorious service to the United States in a duty of great responsibility.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 540, §8743; renumbered §9273, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(11), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(12)(A)(iii), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3811.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8743 | 10:1407. | July 9, 1918, ch. 143 (10th par., less words after 1st semicolon, under "Ordnance Department"), 40 Stat. 870. |

The words "but not in the name of Congress" are omitted as surplusage, since a medal is presented in the name of Congress only if the law so directs. The words "since the 6th day of April, 1917" are omitted as executed. The word "award" is substituted for the word "present" to cover the determination of the recipients as well as the actual presentation of the medal, and to conform to other sections of this chapter. The words "or herself" are omitted, since, under section 1 of title 1, words importing the masculine gender include the feminine. The words "or who shall distinguish" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted "or the Space Force" after "the Air Force".

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8743 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2006310EN.01000802.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/8

---

Action brought on 6 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-424/06)

(2006/C 310/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Montaguti and N. Yerrell, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities or, in any event, by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities or, in any event, by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2002/15/EC into domestic law expired on 23 March 2005.

---