alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | (i) | That the Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/ Tal Gilat                                    |   |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Tal Gilat, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                | (Principal Executive Officer)                    |
|                |                                             |
| Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/ David (Dadi) Avner                           |   |
|                | David (Dadi) Avner, Chief Financial Officer      |
|                | (Principal Financial Officer)                    |

----

----
§ 720.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf person (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and adminstrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 720.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the
applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement, hereby certifies, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | I have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the period commencing on January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2016 (the
Reporting Period), and the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability companyBy:

LOGOJob WarshawPresident


Dated: February 22, 2017





1601 Washington
Avenue  ●  Suite 700  ●  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  ●  Fax: (305) 695-5601
Exhibit
32.1

Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of The Knot, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, David Liu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.

|                   |                                                 
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------------
|                   | /s/ David Liu                                   
|                   |                                                 
|                   | David Liu
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |                                                 
|Date: May 11, 2006 |                                                 

---
§ 20.500 Who is eligible for Child Assistance? A child is eligible for Child Assistance under this subpart if all of the following criteria are met: ( a ) The child must meet the requirements in § 20.300.
( b ) The child's legally responsible parent, custodian/guardian, or Indian court having jurisdiction must: ( 1 ) Request assistance under this part in writing;
( 2 ) State that they are unable to provide necessary care and guidance for the child, or to provide for the child's special needs in his/her own home; and
( 3 ) Provide a documented social services assessment from the social services worker of whether parent(s), custodian, guardian(s) are able to care for their child.
( c ) All income accruing to the child, except income exempted by federal statute, must be used to meet the cost of special needs, foster home or residential care facility as authorized and arranged by social services.
|                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                      |  |  |
|                                                                                                 |   |   |
| /s/ Kathryn M. JohnBullKathryn M. JohnBullChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer) |   |   |
#### George R. Conklin and George H. Strong, Respondents, v. William H. Coddington, Defendant. John C. Minturn, Subsequent Licnor, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.- Ho opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
# C_2007034EN.01000101.xml

| 16.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 February 2007

(2007/C 34/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3137 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4541 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2235 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6267 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,42 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0825 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5791 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,280 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,87 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6969 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8988 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3790 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,373 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8260 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6721 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5326 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2591 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8885 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0169 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 227,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4310 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1884 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3557 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 877,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5927 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,373 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,870 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3137

JPY

Japanese yen

157,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4541

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67115

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2235

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6267

ISK

Iceland króna

88,42

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0825

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5791

CZK

Czech koruna

28,280

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,87

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6969

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8988

RON

Romanian leu

3,3790

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,373

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8260

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6721

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5326

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2591

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8885

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0169

KRW

South Korean won

1 227,98

ZAR

South African rand

9,4310

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1884

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3557

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 877,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5927

PHP

Philippine peso

63,373

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4600

THB

Thai baht

43,870

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 584.12 What happens after the hearing? ( a ) Within 30 days after the record closes, the presiding official shall issue his or her recommended decision, except that if the subject of the appeal is an order of temporary closure under § 573.4 of this chapter, the presiding official shall issue a recommended decision within 20 days after the record closes.
( b ) The recommended decision shall be in writing, based on the whole record, and include: ( 1 ) Recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law upon each material issue of fact or law; and
( 2 ) A recommended grant or denial of relief.
( c ) The presiding official's recommended decision is reviewed by the Commission. The Commission issues the final decision.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 434]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ434.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 3197]]

Public Law 109-434
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend through December 31, 2008, the authority of the Secretary of 
 the Army to accept and expend funds contributed by non-Federal public 
    entities to expedite the processing of permits. <<NOTE: Dec. 20, 
                         2006 -  [H.R. 6316]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

    Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 117 Stat. 1836; 119 Stat. 2169; 120 
Stat. 318) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2006'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2008''.

    Approved December 20, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6316:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Dec. 5, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Mueller, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      John P. MuellerJohn
      P. Mueller
                  Chief
      Financial Officer




Date: May
10, 2010
§ 37.122 Once geographic attendance boundaries are established, how can they be changed? ( a ) The Secretary can change the geographic attendance boundaries of a day school, on-reservation boarding school, or peripheral dorm only after: ( 1 ) Notifying the Tribe at least 6 months in advance; and
( 2 ) Giving the Tribe an opportunity to suggest different geographical attendance boundaries.
( b ) A tribe may ask the Secretary to change geographical attendance boundaries by writing a letter to the Director of the Office of Indian Education Programs, explaining the tribe's suggested changes. The Secretary must consult with the affected tribes before deciding whether to accept or reject a suggested geographic attendance boundary change. ( 1 ) If the Secretary accepts the Tribe's suggested change, the Secretary must publish the change in the Federal Register.
( 2 ) If the Secretary rejects the Tribe's suggestion, the Secretary will explain in writing to the Tribe why the suggestion either: ( i ) Does not meet the needs of Indian students to be served; or
( ii ) Does not provide adequate stability to all affected programs.
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.154 What must a notice of intent to reassume include? A notice of intent to reassume must include: ( a ) A statement of the reasons for the intended reassumption, including, as applicable, a copy of the Secretary's written finding of imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset;
( b ) A description of specific measures that the Tribe must take to correct the violation and any condition that caused the imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset;
( c ) The time period within which the Tribe must take the measures to correct the violation of the TERA and any condition that caused the imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset; and
( d ) The effective date of the reassumption, if the Tribe does not meet the requirements in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
Directory of Trails        - Directory of Trails
        - 1. Tidelands Trail - Fremont
        - 2. LaRiviere Marsh Trail -Fremont
        - 3. Shoreline Trail & 4. No Name Trail - Fremont
        - 5. Newark Slough Trail - Fremont
        - 6. Warm Springs Trail - Fremont
        - 7. Coyote Creek Lagoon Trail - Fremont
        - 8. Alviso Slough Trail - Alviso
        - 9. Mallard Slough Trail - Alviso
        - 10. New Chicago Marsh Trail - Alviso
        - 11. Moffett Bay Trail - Sunnyvale
        - 12. Stevens Creek East Trail - Mountain View
        - 13. Faber-Laumeister Trail - East Palo Alto
        - 14. Ravenswood Trail - Menlo Park
        - 15. SF2 Trail - Menlo Park
        - 16. Bair Island Trail - Redwood City

## 10. New Chicago Marsh Trail - Alviso

**Length**0.5 mile loop

**Amenities and Uses**Information, parking, wheelchair accessible, drinking water, restrooms, hiking, bicycling. No pets.

**Trail Surface**Wooden boardwalk is wheelchair accessible. The section of trail that overlaps with the Mallard Slough Trail is compacted dirt levee. This section will get muddy when wet. 

**Highlights**Salt marsh attracts egrets, herons, shorebirds, Canada geese, and rabbits. A short, easy trail with plenty of wildlife to see in such a compact area. 

**Connections to Other Trails**Connects to Mallard Slough Trail. Easily connects to Marsh View Trail. Marsh View Trail provides an alternative access to the Environmental Education Center, and New Chicago Marsh and Mallard Slough Trails.

**Directions to Trailhead**From HWY 880 or HWY 101, exit HWY 237 toward Mountain View/Alviso. Turn north onto Zanker Rd. Continue on Zanker Rd. and to the refuge entrance (a sharp right turn at Grand Blvd). The trailhead is accessible from the arking lot of the Environmental Education Center in Alviso.

**Click on map to enlarge.**
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVulnerability of manned spacecraft to crew loss from orbital debris penetrationOrbital debris growth threatens the survival of spacecraft systems from impact-induced failures. Whereas the probability of debris impact and spacecraft penetration may currently be calculated, another parameter of great interest to safety engineers is the probability that debris penetration will cause actual spacecraft or crew loss. Quantifying the likelihood of crew loss following a penetration allows spacecraft designers to identify those design features and crew operational protocols that offer the highest improvement in crew safety for available resources. Within this study, a manned spacecraft crew survivability (MSCSurv) computer model is developed that quantifies the conditional probability of losing one or more crew members, P(sub loss/pen), following the remote likelihood of an orbital debris penetration into an eight module space station. Contributions to P(sub loss/pen) are quantified from three significant penetration-induced hazards: pressure wall rupture (explosive decompression), fragment-induced injury, and 'slow' depressurization. Sensitivity analyses are performed using alternate assumptions for hazard-generating functions, crew vulnerability thresholds, and selected spacecraft design and crew operations parameters. These results are then used to recommend modifications to the spacecraft design and expected crew operations that quantitatively increase crew safety from orbital debris impacts.Document ID19940025656Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWilliamsen, J. E.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1994Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-108452NAS 1.15:108452Accession Number94N30161Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19940025656.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### SUBCHAPTER II—FEDERAL RESERVE AND MEMBER BANKS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND EXAMINERS
#### § 75.5 Removal of deceased persons from the roll.

The name of any person who was not alive as of midnight August 21, 1957, shall be stricken from the basic membership roll by the Tribal Enrollment Office upon receipt of a death certificate or other evidence of death acceptable to the Tribal Enrollment Office.

[38 FR 9998, Apr. 23, 1973. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
### §1701z–10a. Biennial survey of economic and housing market conditions

The Secretary shall, not less than biennially, survey national, regional, and local economic and housing market conditions in a manner that provides data comparable to the data collected in such survey conducted in 1981.

(Pub. L. 91–609, title V, §512, as added Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §466(b)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1236.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970, and not as part of the National Housing Act which comprises this chapter.
[No. 4768.]

#### The Cripple Creek Mining Company v. Esteb.

Former Opinion Followed.

The judgment in this case is affirmed in accordance with the opinion in Cripple Cseek Mining Co. v. Brahant, ante, p. 4&3.

*Appeal from the District Court of Teller County.*

*Hon. Louis W. Cunningham, Judge.*

Action by Paul Esteb against Tbe Cripple Creek Mining Company. From a judgment for plaintiff-, defendant appeals.

*Affirmed.*

JVCessrs. Wolcott, Vaile & Waterman and Mr. H. H. Dunham (Mr. Wm. W. Field, of counsel), for appellant.

Messrs. Stimson & Smith and Mr. James J. Mc-Feely, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Campbell

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Tbis action for tbe recovery of damages for personal injuries caused by defendant’s negligence was submitted to tbe same jury that tried tbe case of *Cripple Creek M. Co. v. Brabant, ante,*page 423. Tbe plaintiff’s injury was inflicted at tbe same time, tbe issues in tbe two actions were substantially tbe same, and tbe evidence identical. Tbe same questions of fact and law are involved in tbe two cases. Tbe ruling there is controlling here, and accordingly tbe judgment in tbis case is affirmed. *Affirmed.*

Chief Justice Gabbert and Mr. Justice Steele concur.