alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 13.18 Authority of the ALJ. ( a ) The ALJ will conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceeding is Made.
( b ) The ALJ has the authority to: ( 1 ) Set and change the date, time, and place of the hearing upon reasonable notice to the parties;
( 2 ) Continue or recess the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 3 ) Hold conferences to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of Documents at depositions or at hearings;
( 6 ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Regulate the scope and timing of discovery;
( 8 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of Representatives and parties;
( 9 ) Examine witnesses;
( 10 ) Receive, rule on, exclude, or limit evidence;
( 11 ) Upon motion of a party, take official notice of facts;
( 12 ) Upon motion of a party, decide cases, in whole or in part, by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 13 ) Conduct any conference, argument, or hearing on motions in Person or by telephone; and
( 14 ) Exercise such other authority as is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the ALJ under this part.
( c ) The ALJ does not have the authority to Make any determinations regarding the validity of treaties or other international agreements, Federal statutes or regulations, or Departmental Orders or Directives.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. R UDY M A R T INEZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10675

D.C . No. 5:12-c r-00769-EJD
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Edwa rd J. Da vila , Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. R udy M artine z a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a

c onvic tion a

nd 140-m onth se nte nc e for posse s sion with inte nt to distributem e tha

m phe tam ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . § 841(a )(1) an d (b)(1)(B )(viii); a

nd posse ssion with inte

nt to distribute

he roin, in viola

tion of 21 

# F IL ED NOV 26 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S.C . § 841(a )(1) and (b)(1)(B )(i). Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

a lifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), M artine z ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e have provide d M artine zthe opportunity to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d
. M artine z ha s wa ive d his right to a ppe a l his c o nvic tion a

nd se nte nc e . Our inde pe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua nt to P e n son v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to the va lidity of the wa ive r. Se eUnite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a c c ordingly dism iss the a ppe a l. Se eid. at 988. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. DISM I SSE D.

1 3
- 1 0 6 7 5 2
### [§2410q. Renumbered §2922i]
#### § 573.1 What is the purpose of this part?

Voluntary compliance is the goal of the Commission. Voluntary compliance is achieved when a tribe and the NIGC staff are able to resolve any potential enforcement issues prior to the Chair issuing an enforcement action. This part sets forth efforts for achieving voluntary compliance and enforcement action when voluntary compliance is not forthcoming. While this part is intended to garner voluntary compliance through a graduated enforcement process, there may be circumstances under which a graduated enforcement process is omitted and an enforcement action must be taken. This part also sets forth general rules governing the Commission's enforcement of the Act, this chapter, and tribal ordinances and resolutions approved by the Chair under part 522 of this chapter. Civil fines in connection with notices of violation issued under this part are addressed in part 575 of this chapter.

[77 FR 47518, Aug. 9, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 31995, June 5, 2015]
### §1701g–5c. Transfer of rehabilitation loan fund assets and liabilities

Notwithstanding section 289(c) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (Public Law 101–625), the assets and liabilities of the revolving fund established by section 1452b 1 of title 42, and any collections, including repayments or recaptured amounts, of such fund shall be transferred to and merged with the Revolving Fund (liquidating programs), established pursuant to title II of the Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1955, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1701g–5), effective October 1, 1991.

(Pub. L. 102–139, title II, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 752.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 289(c) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (Pub. L. 101–625), referred to in text, is not classified to the Code.

Section 1452b of title 42, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §289(b), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4128.

The Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1955, as amended, referred to in text, is act June 24, 1954, ch. 359, 68 Stat. 272. Provisions of title II of this Act relating to the establishment of the revolving fund (liquidating programs) are classified to section 1701g–5 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1992, and not as part of the National Housing Act which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 700.467 Construction costs.

Construction costs and costs relating to construction such as machinery and equipment, architect/engineer services, and administrative services may be allowable as determined by the Commission.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Publications             
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeOur AgencyOur Mission, Vision & Values

***PROTECTING THOSE WHO PROTECT OUR NATION​***

## **Mission**

**Protecting Those Who Protect Our Nation**

## **Vision**

**Excellence in Force Protection**

## **Values**

                        - Integrity
                        - Vigilance
                        - Service

  

  

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 30.121 How will the Secretary implement requirements for comprehensive support and improvement activities? ( a ) Once notified that it has been identified for comprehensive support and improvement, each BIE-funded school is required to develop and implement, in partnership with stakeholders (including principals and other school leaders, teachers, and parents), a comprehensive support and improvement plan to improve student outcomes that: ( 1 ) Is informed by all indicators described in § 30.111(f), including student performance against BIE-determined long-term goals described in § 30.111(d);
( 2 ) Includes evidence-based interventions;
( 3 ) Is based on a school-level needs assessment;
( 4 ) Identifies resource inequities, which may include a review of school-level budgeting, to be addressed through implementation of such comprehensive support and improvement plan;
( 5 ) Is approved by the school and the BIE; and
( 6 ) Upon approval and implementation, is monitored and periodically reviewed by the BIE.
( b ) In regard to high schools that have been identified as having failed to graduate one-third or more of their students, the BIE may: ( 1 ) Permit differentiated improvement activities that use evidence-based interventions in the case of a school that predominantly serves students: ( i ) Returning to education after having exited secondary school without a regular high school diploma; or
( ii ) Who, based on their grade or age, are significantly off track to accumulate sufficient academic credits to meet high school graduation requirements; and
( 2 ) In the case of a school that has a total enrollment of fewer than 100 students, permit the BIE-funded school to forego implementation of improvement activities.
# C_2006326EN.01003001.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/30

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 18 October 2006 — Unión General de Trabajadores de la Rioja UGT-RIOJA v Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya, Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, Cámara de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Bilbao, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

(Case C-428/06)

(2006/C 326/62)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Unión General de Trabajadores de la Rioja UGT-RIOJA

Applicant:

Defendants: Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya, Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, Cámara de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Bilbao, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

Defendants:

Question referred

Must Article 87(1) EC be construed as meaning that, by providing for a rate of tax lower than the basic rate set in Spanish State legislation and for deductions from the amount of tax payable which do not exist in State tax legislation, provisions in the field of taxation adopted by the Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Bizkaia amending Articles 29(1)(a), 37 and 39 of the Provincial Law on Company Tax, which take effect in the jurisdiction of that infra-State autonomous body, must be regarded as selective and as covered by the definition of State aid enshrined in Article 87(1) EC and, accordingly, must be notified to the Commission pursuant to Article 88(3) EC?

---
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 

Number: BC1101780 
  
 



 
 CERTIFICATE 

OF 
 CHANGE OF NAME

 BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT 
 I
Hereby Certify that THE VERY GOOD BUTCHERS INC. changed its name to THE VERY GOOD FOOD COMPANY INC. on October 1, 2019 at 10:29 AM Pacific Time. 
  

			
	



	 	 Issued under my hand at Victoria, British Columbia

On October 1, 2019

	 	




	 	CAROL PREST
	 	Registrar of Companies
	 	Province of British Columbia
	 	Canada
	 	
	 	
		
	ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATE	 	













 Number: BC1101780 
  





 
 CERTIFICATE 

OF 
 INCORPORATION

 BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT 
 I
Hereby Certify that THE VERY GOOD BUTCHERS INC. was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act on December 27, 2016 at 12:40 PM Pacific Time. 
  

			
	



	 	 Issued under my hand at Victoria, British Columbia

On December 27, 2016

	 	




	 	CAROL PREST
	 	Registrar of Companies
	 	Province of British Columbia
	 	Canada
	 	
	 	
		
	ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATE
European Security Toward The Year 2000
Contributors
William T. Johnsen    -   Thomas Durell-Young
Jeffrey Simon 
Daniel N. Nelson
William Bodie
James McCarthy

**NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY
**McNair Paper 20**
August 1993

Franco-German Security Accommodation:Agreeing to Disagree
Central Europe:  "Return to Europe" or Descent to Chaos?
A Balkan Perspective
Anarchy and Cold War in Moscow's "Near Abroad"
Strengthening Security in Central and Eastern Europe:  New Opportunities for NATO

*Return to NDU Homepage *INSS Homepage *What's New*****
# C_2006310EN.01002601.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/26

---

Action brought on 18 October 2006 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (1000)

(Case T-298/06)

(2006/C 310/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. (Częstochowa, Poland) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck and T. Dolde, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 August 2006 in case No R 447/2006-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 August 2006 in case No R 447/2006-4; and

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘1 000’ for goods and services in classes 16, 28 and 41 — application No 4 372 264

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as numerals in principle, according to the applicant, are not devoid of distinctive character and can function as an indication of origin in the same way as words.

Pleas in law:

Violation of Article 7(1)(c) of the regulation as the trade mark applied for is not descriptive since consumers confronted with the trade mark ‘1 000’ on printed articles will not be able to deduct any information about the characteristics of the goods concerned.

---
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# PD-2(R): Illinois EPA Hazardous Waste Manifest
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****NTP, currentdirections and evolving strategies**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.3551/3:
ItemNumber:0507-P-12(online)
CGPSystem Number:000600092
 
2001
2002
2004
2005
2006
2014
 
 
 **
| 1.                | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 2.                | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report. |
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| Date: May 4, 2016 | /s/ David Mecklenburger                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|              | David Mecklenburger                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |
|              | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |

----
### §1012. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §35, 39 Stat. 384, reserved to Congress the right to amend, alter, or repeal former subchapter I or III of this chapter.
SERVED JANUARY 15,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ..^^nr-.n' 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS DFPT Crj::^'i!;:V^'i'^''^''' 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EVERGREEN HELICOPTERS OF ALASKA 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09AL0010 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2009-0841 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on June 23 and 24, 2010, at the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, 222 W. 

7"" Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99513.' 

Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties 

should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be 

removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper pleading(s). Pleadings 

may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

' The parties are advised to checic with the Clerk's office to confirm the exact courtroom on the day of the 

hearing. 
FAA Docket No. CP09AL0010 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Marc G. Wilhelm, Respondent's Counsel 

Richmond & Quiim PC 

Attorneys at Law 

360 K Street, Suite 200 

Anchorage, AK 99501-2038 

TEL: 907-276-5727 

FAX: 907-276-2953 

Glerm H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Coimsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7*^ Avenue, #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5269 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-51,21 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
No. 89-6574.

#### Ervin *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
### §1701r. Congressional findings respecting housing for senior citizens

The Congress finds that there is a large and growing need for suitable housing for older people both in urban and rural areas. Our older citizens face special problems in meeting their housing needs because of the prevalence of modest and limited incomes among the elderly, their difficulty in obtaining liberal long-term home mortgage credit, and their need for housing planned and designed to include features necessary to the safety and convenience of the occupants in a suitable neighborhood environment. The Congress further finds that the present programs for housing the elderly under the Department of Housing and Urban Development have proven the value of Federal credit assistance in this field and at the same time demonstrated the urgent need for an expanded and more comprehensive effort to meet our responsibilities to our senior citizens.

(Pub. L. 87–723, §2, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 670; Pub. L. 90–19, §19, May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 25.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Senior Citizens Housing Act of 1962, and not as part of the National Housing Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1967—Pub. L. 90–19 substituted "Department of Housing and Urban Development" for "Housing and Home Finance Agency" in second sentence.