alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 83.32 When will OFA issue a proposed finding?

(a) OFA will issue a proposed finding as shown in the following table:

| OFA must | within . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Complete its review under Phase I and either issue a negative proposed finding and publish a notice of availability in the Federal Register, or proceed to review under Phase II | six months after notifying the petitioner under § 83.25 that OFA has begun review of the petition. |
| (2) Complete its review under Phase II and issue a proposed finding and publish a notice of availability in the Federal Register | six months after the deadline in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. |

(b) The times set out in paragraph (a) of this section will be suspended any time the Department is waiting for a response or additional information from the petitioner.

(c) OFA will strive to limit the proposed finding and any reports to no more than 100 pages, cumulatively, excluding source documents.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-28 

August 31, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4007 Payment of Premiums

29 CFR 2602 Payment of Premiums 

OPINION: 

 This is in reference to your letter regarding the above-referenced plan (the "Plan") and our letter in response (copy

enclosed). As we discussed over the telephone on June 9, 1981, this is to supplement our initial response. 

First, the Plan is not required to pay premiums for those * * * Corporation * * * employees who are excluded from

participation in the Plan while they are represented by a union. However, * * * is required to pay premiums for nonunion employees earning credited service under the terms of the Plan without regard to whether their compensation falls

below the integration cut-off. 

Second, your letter directed our attention to Plan Sections 2.1(8)(3), 1.2(A)(1), and 1.40 which relate to credited

service and participation in this integrated pension plan. Our conclusions since only employees can earn credited service,

and as Section 1.17 limits the definition of employee to persons employed by directly, we conclude that premiums do

not have to be paid for employees of trades or businesses under common control with * * *. 

W e hope this response has been helpful. Should you have any questions, please phone [*2] * * * the attorney

handling this matter, at (202) 254-3010. 

Mitchell Strickler 

Deputy General Counsel
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Leonard Ray Anderson, appellant.

227 N. W. 2d 859

Filed April 10, 1975.

No. 39557.

*466Frank B. Morrison, Sr., and Stanley A. Kreiger, for appellant.

Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General and Gary B. Schneider, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., Boslaugh, McCown, and Newton, JJ., and Stuart, District Judge.

White, C. J.

The defendant contends, on appeal, the excessiveness of two concurrent indeterminate sentences of 8 to Í5 years for separate acts of kidnapping against two different victims. We affirm the judgments and sentences of the District Court.

The sentences here imposed did not arise out of the same incident or “transaction.” They were committed against two separate young women victims at separate times on September 10, 1973. In both cases the defendant forced the two student young women at gunpoint to drive their automobiles considerable distances in the City of Omaha, Nebraska, and in one case to the vicinity of Highways Nos. 36 and 133. Both victims escaped by jumping from their cars, one while almost stopped and the other while moving at considerable speed. Further details need not be recited. The crimes were premeditated and violent and could easily have resulted in death or serious physical injury. The second kidnapping was committed with an arrogant disregard of consequences and lack of fear of apprehension for the commission of the first one.

The defendant’s record, as recited in his brief, does not commend itself to a minimum or “light” sentence: In 6 years, 18 traffic charges and 11 'convictions, including 1 charge for driving on a suspended license, 2 auto theft charges, a conviction for assault, 30 days in • jail for larceny, and 60 days in jail for carrying a concealed weapon. The trial judge observed the defendant during the course of the trial and heard the evidence. The *467defendant here is the same person involved in State v. Anderson, No. 39631, *post*p. 467, 227 N. W. 2d 857, decided solely on procedural grounds in an opinion filed today.

We find no abuse of discretion appearing in the record, a necessary condition to modification of a criminal sentence on appeal. State v. Wilson, *ante*p. 26, 225 N. W. 2d 37.

The judgment and sentence of the District Court are correct and are affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### § 291.12 Who will monitor and enforce tribal compliance with the Class III gaming procedures?

The Indian tribe and the State may have an agreement regarding monitoring and enforcement of tribal compliance with the Indian tribe's Class III gaming procedures. In addition, under existing law, the NIGC will monitor and enforce tribal compliance with the Indian tribe's Class III gaming procedures.
Supplemental Finder Agreement  This Supplemental Finder Agreement (Agreement) is made and entered into as of August 12, 2009 by and between Socialwise, Inc. (formerly IdeaEdge, Inc.), a California corporation (Company), and SPN Investments, Inc. (or its associates or designees) (Finder), on behalf of Socialwise, Inc., a Colorado corporation, with reference to the following facts:


1. Finder and Company have an existing business relationship whereby the Finder introduces prospective investors to Company (Finder Services);  2. Finder and Company currently has an existing agreement dated August 12, 2008 (effective June 1, 2008) in place for Finder Services (Finder Agreement); and  3. Company granted Finder warrants to purchase 350,000 shares of Company common stock pursuant to the Warrant Agreement (Warrant Agreement) dated June 8, 2009.  ACCORDINGLY, Company and Finder agree to supplement the aforementioned agreements as follows:  1. Company hereby grants to Finder an additional 500,000 shares of its unregistered common stock upon the Finders having assisted the Companys successful raise of $2,000,000 in equity capital at a price per share at or in excess of $0.50 per share, beginning July 1, 2009 and terminating prior to September 30, 2009. 2. Finder agrees to hold the shares in its own name from the date of grant for three years or until the Reclassification, Reorganization or Merger of the Company (as defined in the Warrant Agreement). 3. Finder agrees to modify the Warrant Agreement to cause the vesting of the second tranche of 175,000 warrants to occur upon receipt by the Company of $3,000,000, rather than the previously specified $2,000,000.   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


Socialwise, Inc.: SPN Investments, Inc.:    /s/ Jonathan Shultz /s/ Robert Wheat Jonathan Shultz, CFO Robert Wheat, President
# C_2006331EN.01004501.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/45

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 December 2006 — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission

(Case F-17/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Sick leave - Placing on compulsory sick leave)

(2006/C 331/100)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: José António de Brito Sequeira Carvalho (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: K.H. Hagenaar, subsequently O. Martins and M. Boury, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, subsequently D. Martin, Agents, and by C. Falmagne, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

First, a declaration that the Commission's decision placing the applicant on compulsory sick leave is non-existent, together with an order that the Commission put an end to the alleged blatantly unlawful conduct of which the applicant considers himself to be the victim, and, second, an application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 13 July 2004 forbidding Mr de Brito Sequeira Carvalho access to Commission buildings; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 13 July 2004 forbidding Mr de Brito Sequeira Carvalho access to Commission buildings;

| 2. | annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 22 September 2004 extending the applicant's sick leave by six months and the subsequent extension of that sick leave; |
| --- | --- |

2.

annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 22 September 2004 extending the applicant's sick leave by six months and the subsequent extension of that sick leave;

| 3. | dismisses the remainder of the forms of order sought in the application; |
| --- | --- |

3.

dismisses the remainder of the forms of order sought in the application;

| 4. | orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and two-thirds of the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

4.

orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and two-thirds of the costs incurred by the applicant.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-145/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005.

1

---
g SCONAN Sitter

UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP BACCARO BANK

on -- . rt i

'

hA WAVE BANE
. 1 7

} | \\
A /| it see Oo BANK |
pA | |
} \

?

Asad se Wawnrgton, OC :
UA DEPAREMANT OF COMMERCE 2 BACCARO BANK
NHANORAG OCEANIC AND ATWONMEEC ADMINSTEATIN
ATION) OCEAN sERVECT NOS NK 20-4
1985

Aatoerua ten fe ETERS No 200 fatTN DEPTH,

tm NUPUEMUDHIEDY Ye mAb

seven,

DAlTVak nia OW WATER

PRAnSTreRSe MURCIA MRELEC ER
Seale 1 25000
#### Kate Kiernan, as Administratrix, etc., of John Kiernan, Jr., Deceased, Respondent, v. Otto M. Eidlitz and Robert J. Eidlitz, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
§ 556.5 Tribal eligibility determination. A tribe shall conduct an investigation sufficient to make an eligibility determination. ( a ) To make a finding concerning the eligibility of a key employee or primary management official for granting of a gaming license, an authorized tribal official shall review a person's: ( 1 ) Prior activities;
( 2 ) Criminal record, if any; and
( 3 ) Reputation, habits, and associations.
( b ) If the authorized tribal official, in applying the standards adopted in a tribal ordinance, determines that licensing of the person poses a threat to the public interest or to the effective regulation of gaming, or creates or enhances the dangers of unsuitable, unfair, or illegal practices and methods and activities in the conduct of gaming, an authorizing tribal official shall not license that person in a key employee or primary management official position.
[78 FR 5279, Jan. 25, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 31994, June 5, 2015]
§ 700.531 Government property. Employees shall be held accountable for Government property and monies entrusted to their individual use or in connection with their official duties. An employee has a positive duty to protect and conserve Government property and to use it economically and for official purposes only, for example: ( a ) Only official documents and materials may be reproduced on Government reproduction equipment.
( b ) Government vehicles may be used only on official business and may not be used for personal use or for travel to or from an employee's place of residence, unless specifically authorized or assigned by the supervisor.
( c ) An employee may not use FTS to make personal phone calls at Government expense.
( d ) An employee may not use Government purchase authority for personal acquisitions even though reimbursement is made.
STATE OF KANSAS Department of Health and Environment Notice of Hearing on Proposed State of Kansas Coal Combustion Residuals Part 256 Plan The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) , Division of Environment, Bureau of Waste Management (BWM) , will conduct a public hearing at 1 : 3 0 p .m. Mon day, September 28 , 2015 , in Room 530 , fif th floor , Curtis State Office Building, 1 000 S

. W

. Jackson, Topeka, to consider the adoption of the proposed State of Kansas Coal Combustion Residuals Part 256 Plan

. O n April 17, 2015, EPA published recently adopted regulations in 40 CFR Parts 257 and 261 related to the “Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities” (the CCR rule). The proposed plan demonstrates KDHE’s intent and approach to assess comp liance with and enforce the CCR rule in Kansas. This plan also addresses the original requirements of Part 256 solid waste management plans by explaining how existing state laws and reg ulations have accomplished the 35

- year - old goals required in those plan s. This plan cites existing KDHE laws, regulations, and permit conditions that authorize KDHE to assess compliance and enforcement related to all aspects of the CCR rule. In addition, it explains the state’s intention to adopt the specific CCR regulations by reference over the next 12 to 18 months to more directly address all requirements. All interested parties may submit written comments prior to 5 p

. m . September 28 to Christine Mennicke, Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Bureau of Waste Manag ement, 1000 SW Jackson, Suite 320, Topeka, 66612, by fax to (785) 296

- 8909, or by e

- mail to cmennicke@kdheks.gov. During the hearing, a ll interested parties will be given a reasonable opportunity to present their views orally on the proposed regulations as well as an opportunity to submit their writtencomments. In order to give all parties an opportunity to present their views, it may be necessary to require each participant to limit any oral presentation to an appropriate timeframe. A copy of the pro posed plan may be obtained on the BWM website at www.kdheks.gov/waste/ or by contacting Christine Mennicke at (785) 296

- 0724 or cmennicke@kdheks.gov. Questions pertaining to the proposed plan should be directed to Christine Mennicke. Any individual with a disability may request accommodation in order to participate in the public hearing and may request the proposed plan in an accessible format. Requests for accommodation to participate in the hearing should be made at least five working days in advance of the hearing by contacting Christine Mennicke

.
Susan Mosier, MD Secretary Kansas Department of Health and Environment
§ 43.17 Release of information for health or safety emergencies. ( a ) Educational institutions may release information from student records to appropriate persons in an emergency if the information is necessary to protect the health or safety of a student or other person. The factors to be used in determining whether records may be released under this section include the following: ( 1 ) The seriousness of the threat to the health or safety of the student or other persons.
( 2 ) The need for those records to meet the emergency.
( 3 ) Whether the persons to whom the records are released are in a position to deal with the emergency.
( 4 ) The extent to which time is of the essence in dealing with the emergency.
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_2\ROS_Alt_C.pdf

Location in Arizona

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Recreation Management

Zones

Alternative C

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Map 2-13

Legend

Data Source:

RMZ Alternative: URS 2006

Transportation Alternatives: BLM 2006

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: U.S. Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Note:

 Land use allocations, designations, and management 

 prescriptions apply only to public lands administered

 by the BLM. If non-Federal lands are acquired, they

 would be managed according to the allocations

 depicted on the map.

Recreation Management Zone (RMZ)

Semi-Primitive Motorized (SPM)

Semi-Primitive Non-Motorized (SPNM)

Roaded Natural (RN)

Ragged Top Watchable Wildlife

Primitive

Group Campsites on BLM Land

Recreation Sites

Equine Staging Areas

Agricultural

Reference Information

Residential

Route Designations

Closed for Reclamation

Non-motorized

Motorized
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

78-4 

March 23, 1978 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4044(d)(2) Allocation of Assets. Distribution of Residual Assets Attributable to Employee Contributions 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letters of September 9, 1977 and February 15, 1978, to the Pension Benefit Guaranty

Corporation (the "PBGC") on behalf of the * * * and in confirmation of your telephone conversations with * * * of this

Office. 

In your letters and telephone conversations with * * * you suggested the following method for determining and

distributing those excess assets of the * * * Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees (the "Plan") which are attributable

to employee contributions and requested the PBGC to determine whether such method satisfies the requirements of

Section 4044(d)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1344(d)(2) (Supp.

V, 1975). 

(1) The excess attributable to employee contributions will be determined by multiplying the amount remaining after

the satisfaction of all Plan liabilities by a fraction, the numerator of which is net employee contributions and the

denominator of which is the sum of contributions made by * * * over the life of the Plan and the amount used as the

numerator. For purposes of this letter, [*2] net employee contributions equals total employee contributions over the

life of the Plan minus the amount of employee contributions returned to those employees who withdrew from the Plan

prior to the date of termination and prior to obtaining a vested right to a benefit derived from employer contributions.

(2) The excess attributable to employee contributions will be divided among those employees and former employees

who had a positive contribution balance on the date of termination. For purposes of this letter, a positive contribution

balance exists when an employee's contributions to the Plan exceed the payments actually made to that employee under

the terms of the Plan. 

(3) An individual's share of the excess attributable to employee contributions will be determined by multiplying the

amount determined in (1) by a fraction, the numerator of which is that individual's total contributions to the Plan and the

denominator of which is the total contributions to the Plan of all individuals described in (2). 

The PBGC currently is developing the policies and procedures necessary to implement Section 4044(d)(2).

However, rather than making Plan participants wait for the development [*3] of PBGC procedures, the PBGC is willing

to permit the immediate distribution of excess Plan assets upon a reasonable basis, as suggested in your letters and your

conversations with * * * However, you understand that we cannot give you any assurance as to the result of litigation

by a Plan participant for a different allocation of such assets. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
# C_2006292EN.01000101.xml

| 1.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 November 2006

(2006/C 292/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3200 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 153,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4546 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67425 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0661 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5916 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,15 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1660 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5780 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,972 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 256,27 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6978 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8113 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4349 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,66 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 35,530 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9210 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6753 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5053 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2667 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9330 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0352 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 226,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5479 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3401 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3615 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 097,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7758 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,498 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7140 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,399 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3200

JPY

Japanese yen

153,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4546

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67425

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0661

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5916

ISK

Iceland króna

90,15

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1660

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5780

CZK

Czech koruna

27,972

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

256,27

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6978

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8113

RON

Romanian leu

3,4349

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,66

SKK

Slovak koruna

35,530

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9210

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6753

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5053

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2667

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9330

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0352

KRW

South Korean won

1 226,74

ZAR

South African rand

9,5479

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3401

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3615

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 097,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7758

PHP

Philippine peso

65,498

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7140

THB

Thai baht

47,399

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---