alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1.1 

 5/19/06 

 Page 1 

Cancer Research Funding 

 The National Cancer Institute (NCI), a component of the National Institutes of Health, is 

the Nation’s principal agency for cancer research. As a Federal Government research agency, 

the Institute receives its funds from the U.S. Congress. These funds support research at the 

Institute’s headquarters in Bethesda, Maryland and in laboratories and medical centers 

throughout the United States. The Institute coordinates a national research program on cancer 

causes and prevention, detection and diagnosis, and treatment through various research projects 

and clinical trials. Information about these projects is in the NCI’s Cancer Research Portfolio at 

http://researchportfolio.cancer.gov on the Internet. 

 The NCI’s total budget for Fiscal Year 2005 was $4.83 billion. The NCI will invest an 

estimated $4.79 billion during Fiscal Year 2006. The budget is expected to decrease to 

$4.75 billion in Fiscal Year 2007. Other Federal agencies, state and local governments, 

voluntary organizations, industry, and private institutions also spend a substantial amount of 

money on cancer-related research and services. 

 The following table shows NCI spending in Fiscal Years 2005, 2006, and 2007 for the 

four most common types of cancer in the United States (excluding basal and squamous cell skin 

cancers): 
1.1 

 5/19/06 

 Page 2 

Cancer Site 2005 Spending 

(actual, in millions) 

2006 Spending 

(estimated, in millions) 

2007 Spending 

(estimated, in millions) 

Breast $560.1 $557.3 $551.1 

Colorectal $253.1 $251.9 $249.1 

Lung $266.1 $264.8 $261.9 

Prostate $309.0 $309.0 $305.6 

Information about funding for other types of cancer and additional information about NCI’s 

budget are available on NCI’s Financial Management Branch’s home page at 

http://fmb.cancer.gov/ on the Internet. 

# # # 

Related Resources

Publications (available at http://www.cancer.gov/publications) 

• The Nation’s Investment in Cancer Research: A Plan and Budget Proposal 

National Cancer Institute (NCI) Resources

Cancer Information Service (toll-free)

 Telephone: 1–800–4–CANCER (1–800–422–6237) 

 TTY: 1–800–332–8615 

Online 

NCI’s Web site: http://www.cancer.gov 

LiveHelp, NCI’s live online assistance: 

https://cissecure.nci.nih.gov/livehelp/welcome.asp

This fact sheet was reviewed on 5/19/06
§ 516.1 What is the purpose of this part and to whom does it apply? ( a ) The purpose of this part is to promulgate regulations regarding the release of official National Indian Gaming Commission information and provision of testimony by National Indian Gaming Commission personnel with respect to litigation or potential litigation and to prescribe conduct on the part of National Indian Gaming Commission personnel in response to a litigation-related request or demand.
( b ) This part applies to requests or demands that are litigation-related or otherwise arise out of judicial, administrative or other legal proceedings (including subpoena, order or other demand) for interview, testimony (including by deposition) or other statement, or for production of documents relating to the business of the National Indian Gaming Commission, whether or not the National Indian Gaming Commission or the United States is a party to the litigation. It does not, however, apply to document requests covered by 25 CFR parts 515 and 517.
( c ) To the extent the request or demand seeks official information or documents, the provisions of this part are applicable to Commissioners, employees, and former Commissioners and former employees, of the National Indian Gaming Commission.
#### § 700.211 Basic rights and rules.

The provisions of this subpart do not deprive any displaced person of any rights described elsewhere in these regulations. The Commission may meet its obligation to provide persons with reasonable opportunities to relocate to a replacement dwelling by offering such opportunities developed or to be developed under this subpart.
# C_2006237EN.01001002.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/10

---

Action brought on 11 August 2006 — Bowland Dairy Products v Commission

(Case T-212/06)

(2006/C 237/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bowland Dairy Products Limited (Nelson, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Milligan, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the contested decision;

| — | order the Commission to pay damages to the applicant in the amount of the loss suffered by the applicant as a result of the contested decision, with interest; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay damages to the applicant in the amount of the loss suffered by the applicant as a result of the contested decision, with interest;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant's costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant's costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of its application, the applicant seeks annulment of a decision of the Commission of the European Communities contained in an email to the UK Foods Agency dated 20 July 2006, forwarded to the applicant on 21 July 2006, refusing to circulate, under the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed provided for by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 (OJ L 31 of 1 February 2002, p. 1-24), an additional notification declaring that the Food Security Agency (FSA) was content for the applicant's curd cheese to be marketed, unless conditions specified by the Commission were met.

The applicant claims that the Commission was not entitled to impose conditions upon the circulation of an additional Notice prepared by a national competent authority under Article 50 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002.

Moreover, the applicant submits that in formulating these conditions, the Commission has misinterpreted the applicable Regulations both in relation to antibiotic milk as in relation to watery milk.

---
#### § 17.9 Briefs.

When there are two or more parties with conflicting interests, the party upon whom the burden of proof may fall may be allowed a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days following the conclusion of the hearing, in which to file a brief or other statement of his contentions, showing service on opposing counsel or litigant. The latter shall then be allowed not to exceed 20 days in which to file an answer brief or statement, and his opponent shall have 10 days thereafter to file a reply brief or statement. Upon proper showing the special attorney may grant extensions of time. Each brief or statement shall be filed in duplicate.
§ 19.9 Exemption from Title VII employment discrimination requirements. ( a ) A faith-based organization's exemption, set forth in section 702(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-1), from the Federal prohibition on employment discrimination on the basis of religion is not forfeited when the organization seeks or receives financial assistance from DHS for a social service program or otherwise participates in a DHS program.
( b ) Where a DHS program contains independent statutory or regulatory provisions that impose nondiscrimination requirements on all grantees, those provisions are not waived or mitigated by this part. In this case, grantees should consult with the appropriate DHS program office to determine the scope of any applicable requirements.
[81 FR 19410, Apr. 4, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 15706, Mar. 4, 2024]
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-53 

April 15, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043(b)(2) Reportable Events. Amendment Decreasing Benefits 

OPINION: 

 This has reference to your letter of April 1, 1976, requesting an opinion whether a proposed shift from a nonintegrated pension plan constitutes a plan termination as contemplated by § 4022 of the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.A. § 1322 (1974). 

You state that * * * and * * * sponsors of the Master Pension Plan for their salaried employees, propose integrating

the monthly retirement benefits payable to retiring employees under that plan with benefits payable to their employees

by the Social Security Act. The proposed integration would provide retirement income proportionate to all salary levels.

The plan integration you describe effects a curtailment in benefits. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the

"Corporation") regards such an action as constituting a plan amendment which would decrease the benefit payable to

certain participants and, therefore, a reportable event under § 4043(b)(2), 29 U.S.C.A. § 1343(b)(2). Thus, although

the Corporation does not view the proposed action as a termination, you should report the adoption of the amendment

providing for integration, as provided [*2] in § 4043(b)(2). 

I return to you the copy of your submission to the Internal Revenue Service. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10941-10942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 26, 2011.

[[Page 10942]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Project Committee will be held Tuesday, April 26, 2011, at 2 
p.m., Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. 
Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 
1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-4308 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
■
	



■
	







	







	
	

		
							
		
	


		


		
	

		





	





	

	


 			

	!
		
		"




#	





	


	$		

$		

 "	%

	& 
			'
	(	

		
	
 
	)	*
	
+	

,
	

		

"

		"
 
	%

	"	

 			$	
		

	


	
	


%
	
	+	





	





	
	-


	
		
	%



	
	




%

	


		 $


.	+
%
)	+


	




	

			
	

	"

,

	

	


	
		
		
/

0 1	
		
 
	

	

023	
	
$			


.	
		


3	40256



02	

7	


08			$		






	


			





085
		
			
$		






	
		



	

	
",	

	


$		


9 
	



		"

" 


			


	"	

				
(

			
	
		
	

	",



			%
:	,

%
%
$	;	
			


< 		 
	
	
			
	
	

	
		
;		.	

			
	
	



	
,
				";	
		.		


 
	


/				
	
	





		"		;		


		
(
	
"
;		


	;				

 		



		
	
	

	
		
		
;		
$	
			

.
		

			=	

	

	
	
"	
=

				
	


		
		 #

		



	

>


	"



	
	.
		

	,

	 		
		

2 (
		

	%

	.			

$$	
	
	



>

			%


 			
$
.				

$$	




	



%
$	
	>
	




		

	"
		7	.		

	"



		

		

	


		!
	








?
	@

			
"
	
	

A +	

,
	


		


	

/


		


	
;	

"	+		 	
	 	


	?		
@

	
   	

	    



	
 



		
	
			




 
/
	?B@


		
	

		


		
	#	
",	
					%
		


	


		
"

	


		





?
 		@%



	 	
	 

	



;	
	



		08	



		
		
;


.	+
%
)	+

			
 	



				


	 	
	
	!
		

	




	
 
	%


		



							
			(		
	
	



		


 
	%
		
	"	
	
,		


	


	
	0CDEEC):+C1.(40CDEEC<D9C2<AE6
 
	
	

--- 


.	+
%
)	+


	
	

		 	
	
F



	



	
	
?+



@4+

	+


6
	

		
	

	

		

	
			%
	
	



	


;
§ 37.59 DHS reviews of State compliance. State REAL ID programs will be subject to DHS review to determine whether the State meets the requirements for compliance with this part. ( a ) *General inspection authority.* States must cooperate with DHS's review of the State's compliance at any time. In addition, the State must: ( 1 ) Provide any reasonable information pertinent to determining compliance with this part as requested by DHS;
( 2 ) Permit DHS to conduct inspections of any and all sites associated with the enrollment of applicants and the production, manufacture, personalization and issuance of driver's licenses or identification cards; and
( 3 ) Allow DHS to conduct interviews of the State's employees and contractors who are involved in the application and verification process, or the manufacture and production of driver's licenses or identification cards. DHS shall provide written notice to the State in advance of an inspection visit.
( b ) *Preliminary DHS determination.* DHS shall review forms, conduct audits of States as necessary, and make a preliminary determination on whether the State has satisfied the requirements of this part within 45 days of receipt of the Material Compliance Checklist or State certification documentation of full compliance pursuant to § 37.55. ( 1 ) If DHS determines that the State meets the benchmarks of the Material Compliance Checklist, DHS may grant the State an additional extension until no later than May 10, 2011.
( 2 ) If DHS determines that the State meets the full requirements of subparts A through E, the Secretary shall make a final determination that the State is in compliance with the REAL ID Act.
( c ) *State reply.* The State will have up to 30 calendar days to respond to the preliminary determination. The State's reply must explain what corrective action it either has implemented, or intends to implement, to correct any deficiencies cited in the preliminary determination or, alternatively, detail why the DHS preliminary determination is incorrect. Upon request by the State, an informal conference will be scheduled during this time.
( d ) *Final DHS determination.* DHS will notify States of its final determination of State compliance with this part, within 45 days of receipt of a State reply.
( e ) *State's right to judicial review.* Any State aggrieved by an adverse decision under this section may seek judicial review under 5 U.S.C. Chapter 7.
§ 5.10 FOIA requests for information contained in a Privacy Act system of records. ( a ) *Information subject to Privacy Act.* ( 1 ) If a requester submits a FOIA request for information about him or herself that is contained in a Privacy Act system of records applicable to the requester (*i.e.,* the information contained in the system of records is retrieved by the component using the requester's name or other personal identifier, and the information pertains to an individual covered by the Privacy Act) the request will be processed under both the FOIA and the Privacy Act.
( 2 ) If the information the requester is seeking is not subject to the Privacy Act (*e.g.,* the information is filed under another subject, such as an organization, activity, event, or an investigation not retrievable by the requester's name or personal identifier), the request, if otherwise properly made, will be treated only as a FOIA request. In addition, if the information is covered by the Privacy Act and the requester does not provide proper verification of the requester's identity, the request, if otherwise properly made, will be processed only under the FOIA.
( b ) *When both Privacy Act and FOIA exemptions apply.* Only if both a Privacy Act exemption and a FOIA exemption apply can DHS withhold information from a requester if the information sought by the requester is about him or herself and is contained in a Privacy Act system of records applicable to the requester.
( c ) *Conditions for release of Privacy Act information to third parties in response to a FOIA request.* If a requester submits a FOIA request for Privacy Act information about another individual, the information will not be disclosed without that person's prior written consent that provides the same verification information that the person would have been required to submit for information about him or herself, unless— ( 1 ) The information is required to be released under the FOIA, as provided by 5 U.S.C. 552a (b)(2); or
( 2 ) In most circumstances, if the individual is deceased.
( d ) *Privacy Act requirements.* See DHS's Privacy Act regulations in 5 CFR part 5, subpart B for additional information regarding the requirements of the Privacy Act.
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Fox Petroleum Inc. - Exhibit 10.1






BONUS AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT made the 22nd day of May, 2008.

	 BETWEEN: 	
	 	
      FOX PETROLEUM INC., a company incorporated
      pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada, with an office at 64
      Knightsbridge, London SW1X 7JF 

	 	
	 	(the “Employer”) 
	 	OF THE FIRST PART 
	 AND: 	
	 	RICHARD MOORE, of 1115 Finchley Road,
      London, UK NW11 OQD 
	 	 
	 	(the “Executive”) 
	 	OF THE SECOND PART 


WHEREAS:

A. Upon review of the performance of the Executive, it has been
determined that it is reasonable in the circumstances and in the best interest
of the Employer to pay a bonus to the Executive;

NOW THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration
of the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable
consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged), the
parties hereto agree as follows:

1. BONUS

1.1 In consideration of the services performed by the
Executive, the Employer hereby agrees to pay a bonus to the Executive in the
amount of GBP 5,000 and issue 5,000 restricted common shares in the capital of
the Employer.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have executed this Bonus
Agreement as of the date first written above.

FOX PETROLEUM INC.

	Per: 	/s/ Alexander Craven 	 
	  	Authorized Signatory 	 



	SIGNED, SEALED and DELIVERED by 	) 	 
	RICHARD MOORE in the presence of: 	) 	 
	  	) 	 
	/s/ Alexander
      Craven 	) 	 
	Signature 	) 	 
	Alexander Craven
    	) 	/s/
      Richard Moore 
	Print Name 	) 	RICHARD MOORE 
	Apartment 4, 12
      Stanhope Mews West 	) 	 
	Address 	) 	 
	South Kensington
      London SW7 5RB 	) 	 
	  	) 	 
	Company Director
    	) 	 
	Occupation 	)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Molecular Mechanism of Adverse Metabolic Drug Effects.                    

*Date:*                         March 28, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human  Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-435-6680,                         *skandasa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 11801)    
Dated: February 25, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4784 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00266-CR

James Lewis Coquat

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

156th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. LCR190050

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 30, 2022