alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Robert P. May, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofRenaissance Media Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana)LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and Renaissance MediaCapital Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  [Reserved];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2005    /s/ Robert P. May  Robert P. May  Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2006310EN.01001401.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/14

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 October 2006 — Bitburger Brauerei v OHIM — Anheuser-Busch (BUD, American Bud and Anheuser Busch Bud)

(Joined Cases T-350/04 to T-352/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the Community word mark BUD - Applications for registration of the Community figurative marks American Bud and Anheuser Busch Bud - Earlier national word and figurative marks including the term ‘bit’ - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94)

(2006/C 310/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bitburger Brauerei Th. Simon GmbH (Bitburg Germany) (represented by M. Huth-Dierig, lawyer,)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral)

Defendant:

Other party/ to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Anheuser-Busch, Inc., (Saint Louis, Missouri, United States (represented by: A. Renck, V. von Bomhard, A. Pohlmann, D. Ohlgart and B. Goebel, lawyers,)

Other party/ to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Three applications brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 June 2004 in cases R447/2002-2, R451/2002-2 and R453/2002-2, concerning opposition proceedings between Bitburger Brauerei Th. Simon and Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Bitburger Brauerei Th. Simon GmbH to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bitburger Brauerei Th. Simon GmbH to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 19,22.1.2005.

1

---
#### § 36.96 May students be required to assist with daily or weekly cleaning?

Yes, students can be required to assist with daily or weekly cleaning. However, the ultimate responsibility of cleanliness rests with the homeliving supervisor and local law or rules regarding chemical use must be followed.
#### Alvah P. Crosby. Appellant, *v.*Edward G. Crafts, Respondent.

(Submitted February 23, 1877;

decided March 20, 1877.)

Reported below, 5 Hun, 327.

*8covill & De Witt,*for Appellant.

*Edioard K. Clark,*for Respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion of court below.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed..
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

Map 2-1

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_2\Wildlife_GMU.pdf

Location in Arizona

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Wildlife Habitat Management

Alternative A

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Legend

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Data Source:

Habitat Information: BLM Tucson Field Office 2003

Base Information: BLM Tucson Field Office 2003

Quadrangle Image: U.S. Geological Survey 1977, Tucson

Reference Information

Desert Bighorn Sheep Wildlife Habitat Management Area

Note: 

 Land use allocations, designations, and management 

 prescriptions apply only to public lands administered

 by the BLM. If non-Federal lands are acquired, they

 would be managed according to the allocations

 depicted on the map. 

Surface Management

American Indian Reservation

Military Reservations

State Trust Lands

State, County, City; Wildlife, Park and Outdoor Recreation

Areas

Private

Bureau of Land Management

Pima County

National Park Service

Bureau of Reclamation
H. Res. 626

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 12, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 4392) to authorize appropriations for fiscal

year 2001 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of

the United States Government, the Community Management

Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and

Disability System, and for other purposes. All points of order

against the conference report and against its consideration

are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.205 To what non-medical-related claims against self-determination contractors does FTCA apply? It applies to: ( a ) All tort claims arising from the performance of self-determination contracts under the authority of the Act on or after October 1, 1989; and
( b ) Any tort claims first filed on or after October 24, 1989, regardless of when the incident which is the basis of the claim occurred.
[Exhibit 99.3]

                           CERTIFICATION
                           -------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert L. Jones, Jr., Chairman/CEO, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on
the Company.



By: /s/ Robert L. Jones, Chairman/CEO
-------------------------------------
May 20, 2003
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’SREGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31,2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the“CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS bythe Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Onlyservicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and

1122(d)(4)(xii) (the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activitiesNTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS hasdetermined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) ofthe SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs withrespect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered bythis report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer usingNTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, the undersigned, James A. Cady, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc., and Michael E. McConnell, Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc., do each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc.



Date: November 13, 2003



/s/ James A. CadyJames A. CadyPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board




|Date: | November 13, 2003
|----- | -----------------

/s/ Michael E.
McConnellMichael E. McConnellSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
McNair Paper Number 44, Chapter 5,  October 1995
**A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING IMET'S EFFECTIVENESS
Since its inception during the Cold War, even as the international environment changes, foreign militaryeducation and training programs have been guided by two sets of interests:
U.S. security interests--promoting stability within and among allied and friendly states byimproving their self-defense capabilitiesU.S. diplomatic interests--strengthening bonds of mutual understanding.  	These original objectives remain relevant; only U.S. efforts to achieve them have changed.  Forexample, policy engagement today still tries to strengthen self-defense capabilities of other states, butthe United States now advocates responsibility sharing, urging regional cooperative defensearrangements, to promote mid- to long-term stability.  Washington's aggressive efforts to promote andsupport democracy since the Cold War ended, furthermore, have given new impetus and life to the 1976aim in the IMET legislation of strengthening mutual understanding between the United States and itsfriends and allies.
	The INSS team drew no hard and fast distinctions between U.S. enduring security and diplomaticinterests.  Both have relevance and both are essential.  The team also avoided efforts to weigh relativeimportance to the U.S. among candidate countries using grant and FMS funding.  The study groupconcentrated instead on assessing, from a U.S. national perspective, the effectiveness of the educationand training that IMET and other programs make possible in three areas drawn from the above mentionedsets of interests.  These include the program's contribution to achieving long-term stability worldwide,improving cooperative military relations with the United States, and supporting U.S. diplomatic interestsoverseas and economic interests at home. 
**| Return to Top | Return to Contents |  Next Chapter | Previous Chapter |
*Return to NDU Homepage *INSS Homepage *What's New*******
# C_2006224EN.01005001.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/50

---

Action brought on 31 July 2006 — Select Appointments v OHIM — Manpower (TELESELECT)

(Case T-202/06)

(2006/C 224/105)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Select Appointments (Holdings) Ltd. (St Albans, United Kingdom) (represented by: G.R. Fernando, Barrister, C.J. Leech, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Manpower Inc. (Milwaukee, USA)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | That the decision of the OHIM Board of Appeal dated 18 May 2006 permitting the registration of application No 1 030 980 and dismissing opposition No B 303 158 be set aside; |
| --- | --- |

—

That the decision of the OHIM Board of Appeal dated 18 May 2006 permitting the registration of application No 1 030 980 and dismissing opposition No B 303 158 be set aside;

| — | that the application be refused; and |
| --- | --- |

—

that the application be refused; and

| — | that the appellant have its costs of the Appeal and below before OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

that the appellant have its costs of the Appeal and below before OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: Manpower Inc.

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘TELESELECT’ for services in classes 35 and 41 (Assessment and training services in the field of telephone call handling)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Select Appointments (Holdings)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community word mark ‘SELECT’ for services in classes 35 and 41 — application No 2 111 367 (employment agency, consultancy, information on job opportunities, advertising and personnel management services)

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division's decision

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as, according to the applicant, the likelihood of confusion even in parts of the European Community justified the refusal of registration of the contested mark. Considering the average consumers do not necessarily speak English, the word mark would not have any significant meaning to them, as regards the part ‘SELECT’.

Pleas in law:

Moreover, the applicant claims that assessment services provided by the contested mark are encompassed by the wider employment agency services covered by its own Community trade mark.

---
[Exhibit 99.3]

                           CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert L. Jones, Jr., Chairman/CEO, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on
the Company.



By: /s/ Robert L. Jones,
Chairman/CEO
-------------------------------


July 2, 2003
### §8026. Consultation with Commandant of the Marine Corps on major decisions directly concerning Marine Corps aviation or amphibious force structure and capability

The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the views of the Commandant of the Marine Corps are given appropriate consideration before a major decision is made by an element of the Department of the Navy outside the Marine Corps on a matter that directly concerns Marine Corps aviation or amphibious force structure and capability.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title IX, §935(a), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2109, §5026; renumbered §8026, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834; amended Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title X, §1022(a), (b)(1), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2763.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 inserted "or amphibious force structure and capability" after "aviation" in heading and text.

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5026 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-1999
<CASH>                                             710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (842)
<INVENTORY>                                     19,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,057
<PP&E>                                          52,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,989)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 259,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (15,965)
<BONDS>                                       (115,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          (32,438)
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       (63,125)
<OTHER-SE>                                         401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (259,911)
<SALES>                                        (27,169)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (27,169)
<CGS>                                           15,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (30)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (547)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>