alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit4-5.htm


    EXHIBIT
4.5

     

    


     

    CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT OF

     

    CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION OF

     

    URS
CORPORATION

     

    URS
Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), Does
Hereby Certify:

     

    First:
The name of the Corporation is URS CORPORATION.

     

    Second:  The
date on which the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was originally
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware is February 13,
1976.

     

    Third:  The
Board of Directors of the Corporation, acting in accordance with the provisions
of Sections 141 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, adopted resolutions amending its Certificate of Incorporation as
follows:

     

    The first
paragraph of Article IV of the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation
shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

     

    IV.

     

    “The
total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation has the
authority to issue is Two Hundred Three Million (203,000,000) shares, consisting
of two classes to be designated respectively “common” and
“preferred.”  The number of common shares authorized is Two Hundred
Million (200,000,000) shares, $0.01 par value per share.  The number
of preferred shares authorized is Three Million (3,000,000) shares, $0.01 par
value per share.”

     

    Fourth:  Thereafter
pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors, such amendment was
submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for their approval, and was
duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    

     

    In Witness
Whereof, URS Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment of
Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by its Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer and attested to by its Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary this 22nd day of May, 2008.

     

    


     

     

    
      
        	 	URS
Corporation	 
	 	 	 	 
	
              	
                By:
      

              	/s/ H.
      Thomas Hicks	 
	 	 	H. THOMAS
      HICKS 	 
	 	 	Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 	 	 	 


      

    

    
    

    Attest:

    
      
        	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                 

              	
                By:
      

              	/s/ Joseph
      Masters	 
	 	 	Joseph
      Master	 
	 	 	Vice
      President, General Counsel and Secretary
# C_2006224EN.01004802.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/48

---

Action brought on 12 July 2006 — Télévision Française 1 v Commission

(Case T-193/06)

(2006/C 224/102)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Télévision Française 1 (Boulogne, France) (represented by: J.-P. Hordies and C. Smits, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought by the applicant

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the application admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible and well founded;

| — | order the annulment of the decision given by the Commission on 22 March 2006 concerning aid schemes for the film and audiovisual industry; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the annulment of the decision given by the Commission on 22 March 2006 concerning aid schemes for the film and audiovisual industry;

| — | make an appropriate order as to costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

make an appropriate order as to costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

On 3 October 2001 the applicant lodged with the Commission two complaints by which it applied for a finding that the changes to the aid schemes in the field of support for the film and audiovisual industry in France constituted illegal State aid, in so far as they conferred, in breach of Article 88(3) EC, and in any event, State aid incompatible with the common market.

By Decision C(2006)832 Final of 22 March 2006 (State Aid NN 84/2004 and N 95/2004 — France, aid schemes for the cinema and audiovisual industry), the Commission declared the support schemes for cinematographic and audiovisual production put in place in France to be compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(c) and (d) EC. That is the decision contested in this action.

In support of its claims, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

By its first plea in law, the applicant maintains that the Commission infringed essential procedural requirements in that the contested decision is insufficiently reasoned in respect of the nature of parafiscal charges, the nature of the investment obligations imposed on televised broadcasters and the compatibility with the common market of the other measures of State support challenged by the applicant.

By its second plea in law, the applicant claims that the Commission also made manifest errors of assessment of the concept of State resources by deciding that the system of compulsory orders does not involve the transfer of State resources within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC.

The third plea in law relied upon by the applicant alleges breach by the Commission of Article 87(3)(d) EC in that the contested decision contains a manifest error of assessment of the meaning of ‘aid to promote culture’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1027 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1027

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
  To reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the 
        Deschutes Resources Conservancy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deschutes Resources Conservancy 
Reauthorization Act of 2000''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PARTICIPATION OF BUREAU OF RECLAMATION IN 
DESCHUTES RESOURCES CONSERVANCY.
    Section 301 of the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 
(division B of Public Law 104-208; 110 Stat. 3009-534) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting before the period at the 
    end the following: ``, and up to a total amount of $2,000,000 
    during each of fiscal years 2002 through 2006''; and
        (2) in subsection (h), by inserting before the period at the 
    end the following: ``and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2002 
    through 2006''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 653 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 322
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 653

                         [Report No. 106-1008]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 4942) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
 part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

             October 26 (legislative day, October 25), 2000

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 4942) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
 part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4942) making appropriations for the government of the District of 
Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against 
the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2001, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.

                                                       Calendar No. 322

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 653

                         [Report No. 106-1008]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 4942) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
 part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

             October 26 (legislative day, October 25), 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
| (logo) plante moran | **Plante & Moran, PLLC**

10 South Riverside Plaza

9th floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.207.1040

Fax: 312.207.1066

plantemoran.com |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

 

We have examined National TaxSearch, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe National Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certainservicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to theactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

 

Management is responsible forthe Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance withthe servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conductedin accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria andperforming such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactionsand compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination periodand determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performedthose activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing ofselected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations,reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythis report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may haveoccurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this reportfor the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for thePlatform is fairly stated in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

 

Chicago, IL

January 27, 2017

 

 

(logo) Praxity 

MEMBER

GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF 

INDEPENDENT FIRMS
### [§2520. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1081(f), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 454]

Section, added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XI, §1113(b), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2865, related to Navy Reinvestment Program.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-111 

December 29, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

4022(b)(1) & (8) Benefits Guaranteed. Five Year Phase-in of Guarantee

4044(a)(3) Allocation of Assets. Benefits Payable as an Annuity for Three Years Prior to Termination 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter dated November 16, 1975. You ask whether in allocating plan assets pursuant to

§ 4044 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), plan assets would be allocated to nonguaranteed benefits in priority categories 3A and 3B before allocation to guaranteed benefits in priority categoties 4 and

5. The answer is yes. Benefits in priority category 5, however, are not guaranteed. Priority category 4A contains "other

benefits . . . guaranteed under" Title IV of the Act. Act, § 4044(a)(4). Priority categories 3A and 3B are not limited

to guaranteed benefits, but specifically include "benefits payable as an annuity". Priority categories 3A and 3B further

provide a method for determining the benefits assigned thereto, but the method set forth contains nothing which would

limit such benefits to guaranteed benefits. Accordingly, this office has concluded that the benefits covered in priority

categories 3A and 3B include non-guaranteed [*2] benefits. 

You also ask whether insurance protection under Title IV of ERISA for increases in vested benefits required by

ERISA, Titles I and II would be phased-in over a 60 month period under the provisions of ERISA, § 4022(b)(8). Under

the proposed regulation on insurance limits, 40 F.R. 51373-77, Nov. 5, 1974, all increases in the value of plan benefits,

including increases due to adoption of plan amendments to comply with ERISA, Titles I and II, are subject to the phasein required by § 4022(b)(8). 

I trust this has been responsive to your inquiry. If we can be of further assistance, please contact us. 

 * * * 

Staff Attorney
### §7841. Payment of small amounts to public creditors

When authorized by the Secretary of the Army, a disbursing official of Army subsistence funds may keep a limited amount of those funds in the personal possession and at the risk of the disbursing official to pay small amounts to public creditors.

(Added Pub. L. 97–258, §2(b)(10)(B), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1056, §4841; renumbered §7841, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4841 | 31:493. | Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 251 (proviso on p. 1166), 34 Stat. 1166. |

The title of Secretary of War was changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of the Act of July 26, 1947 (ch. 343, 61 Stat. 501), and by sections 1 and 53 of the Act of August 10, 1956 (ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 157, 676). The word "When" is substituted for "as shall from time to time be" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "disbursing official" are substituted for "Officers intrusted with the disbursement" for consistency.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4841 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
(logo) CohnReznick

Advisory ∙ Assurance ∙ Tax

 

CohnReznick LLP

cohnreznick.com

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To CWCapital Asset ManagementLLC

 

We have examined management ofCWCapital Asset Management LLC ("CWCAM")'s assertion that CWCAMcomplied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")'s Regulation AB for thecommercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts included in the accompanyingManagement's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2019. CWCAM's management is responsible for itsassertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management'sassertion about CWCAM's compliance with the specified requirements based on ourexamination.

 

Management has determined thatthe criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(B),(d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(v),(d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and(d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities performed by CWCAM, as aspecial servicer, with respect to CWCAM's Platform. The commercialmortgage-backed securities transactions covered by this Platform are thosespecified in Appendix B in the accompanying Management's Assertion onCompliance with Regulation AB Criteria.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards established by the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that weplan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whethermanagement's assertion about compliance with the specified requirements isfairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performingprocedures to obtain evidence about whether management's assertion is fairlystated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of theprocedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of therisks of material misstatement of management's assertion, whether due to fraudor error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient andappropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Our examination does notprovide a legal determination on CWCAM's compliance with the specifiedrequirements.

 

In our opinion, management'sassertion that CWCAM complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the U.S. SEC's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backedsecuritization trusts included in the accompanying Management's Assertion onCompliance with Regulation AB Criteria is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

 

/s/ CohnReznick LLP

 

Bethesda, Maryland

February 25, 2020
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      12, 2010 | /s/      Paul J. Milano                              |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Name:      Paul J. Milano                       |
|                                  | Title:   Chief      Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Lixia Tu,
the Chief Financial Officer of KBS FASHION GROUP LIMITED (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1.       The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has executed this statement this 16th day of May, 2017.



| | /s/
    Lixia Tu                                
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | Lixia
    Tu                                    
| | Chief
    Financial Officer                     
| | (Principal
    Financial and Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to KBS Fashion Group Limited and will be retained by KBS Fashion Group Limited and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.