alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Manchester United plc (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
30 June 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cliff Baty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Date:
15 September 2016

By:

/s/ CLIFF BATY Cliff Baty Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.233 When must an Indian tribe or tribal organization regulate its employees or subcontractors to avoid a personal conflict of interest?

An Indian tribe or tribal organization must maintain written standards of conduct to govern officers, employees, and agents (including subcontractors) engaged in functions related to the management of trust assets.
# C_2006178EN.01002903.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/29

---

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 18 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland

(Case C-99/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 178/50)

Language of the case: Finnish

Language of the case: Finnish

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 16029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05818]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8228]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Cameroon

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division I, 
Pub. L.112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act with respect to Cameroon, and I hereby 
waive this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 7, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.

    Editorial Note:  This document was received in the Office of the 
Federal Register on March 8, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-05818 Filed 3-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
#### DAILY v. MANN MEDIA, INC.

No. 503P89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 746

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990.
# C_2006294EN.01001002.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom)) — B.F. Cadman v Health & Safety Executive

(Case C-17/05) (1)

1

(Social policy - Article 141 EC - Principle of equal pay for men and women - Length of service as a determinant of pay - Objective justification - Burden of proof)

(2006/C 294/17)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: B.F. Cadman

Appellant:

Respondent: Health & Safety Executive

Respondent:

Intervener: Equal Opportunities Commission

Intervener:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Court of Appeal (Civil Division) — Interpretation of Article 141 EC — Equal pay for men and women — Duration of employment used as a criterion for determining pay and having a different effect according to the sex of the worker

Operative part of the judgment

Article 141 EC is to be interpreted as meaning that, where recourse to the criterion of length of service as a determinant of pay leads to disparities in pay, in respect of equal work or work of equal value, between the men and women to be included in the comparison:

| — | since, as a general rule, recourse to the criterion of length of service is appropriate to attain the legitimate objective of rewarding experience acquired which enables the worker to perform his duties better, the employer does not have to establish specifically that recourse to that criterion is appropriate to attain that objective as regards a particular job, unless the worker provides evidence capable of raising serious doubts in that regard; |
| --- | --- |

—

since, as a general rule, recourse to the criterion of length of service is appropriate to attain the legitimate objective of rewarding experience acquired which enables the worker to perform his duties better, the employer does not have to establish specifically that recourse to that criterion is appropriate to attain that objective as regards a particular job, unless the worker provides evidence capable of raising serious doubts in that regard;

| — | where a job classification system based on an evaluation of the work to be carried out is used in determining pay, there is no need to show that an individual worker has acquired experience during the relevant period which has enabled him to perform his duties better. |
| --- | --- |

—

where a job classification system based on an evaluation of the work to be carried out is used in determining pay, there is no need to show that an individual worker has acquired experience during the relevant period which has enabled him to perform his duties better.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 19.03.2005.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott Kettle, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Gawk Incorporated for the period ended January 31, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gawk Incorporated                                                            





|Dated: October 24, 2017 |  | /s/ Scott Kettle                                                           | 
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                        |  | Scott Kettle                                                               | 
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Information Officer and Director | 
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                              | 
|                        |  | Gawk Incorporated                                                          | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Gawk Incorporated and will be retained by Gawk Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Opinion issued November 13 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00757
- CR

——————————— EX PARTE WILLIAM DAV IAU , Appella nt

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 10

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1981593

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, William Daviau, appeals from the denial of his application for writ of habeas corpus. In his application for writ of habeas cor pus, appellant argues that he was wrongfully arrested and remanded to custody for the purpose of extradition to the State of North Carolina. Appellant challenges his arrest on the grounds that it “is illegal under the double jeopardy statute.” We affirm.2

“The question of whether or not appellant will be placed in double jeopardy is not properly before us and is an issue that has to be determined by the demanding state, in this case” North Carolina. Stelbacky v. State , 22 S.W.3d 583, 587 (Tex. App.

— Amaril lo 2000, no pet.); see Ex parte Gideon , 493 S.W.2d 156, 157 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973) (holding that question of double jeopardy is question for courts of demanding state and not for courts of asylum state). Because appellant’s sole issue in his application f or writ of habeas corpus presents a question that may not be addressed by the courts of this state, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying his application for writ of habeas
corpus. See Kniatt v. State , 206 S.W.3d 657, 664 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 07, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0211. ELIZABETH LOUISE BOARD v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SPCR2103835
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Penton Media Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                expressed in the Report.

Date:  November 13, 2003                   /s/ Thomas L. Kemp
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Thomas L. Kemp
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Preston L. Vice
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Preston L. Vice
                                           Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
#### L. Bradford Prince, Respondent, *v.*William C. Conner, Appellant.

The proper measure of damages in an action for the conversion of chattels is the value of the property at the time of the conversón with interest to the time of the trial.

(Argued March 20, 1877;

decided March 27, 1877.)

*609This was an action to recover damages for the alleged unlawful taking and conversion by defendant of certain goods and chattels the property of plaintiff.

The court charged upon the subject of damages in substance, that if plaintiff was entitled to recover, the jury might allow the market value of the property at the time of the conversion, the damages sustained by plaintiff by reason of the taking and interest on the value; defendant’s counsel excepted to “ that part of the charge which says that the jury are entitled to render a verdict for any damages other than the value of the property and- interest.” *Held,*that the charge was erroneous in this respect and the exception well taken.

*Almon*Goodwin, for appellant.

*M. Lyman*and *L. Bradford Prince,*respondent in person.

Allen, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur.

Judgment reversed.
- Home
- Regulations and Compliance

# PHMSA Guidance

Although some of the materials that can be accessed from this page may fall outside the definitions of “guidance” set forth in 49 CFR 5.25(c), PHMSA has determined that they include potentially useful information for stakeholders and is including them in this database in an effort to make these materials easier for members of the public to find. You may also find useful information that is potentially not accessed from the page in the links below:
                      - PHMSA FAQs
                      - PHMSA Advisory Bulletins
                      - Pipeline Enforcement Guidance
                      - Pipeline Glossary
                      - Pipeline Guidance Manuals
                      - Pipeline Operator Resources
                      - Pipeline Technical Resources
                      - Hazardous Materials Publications
                      - Hazardous Materials Safety Field Operations and Enforcement Guidance
                      - Hazardous Materials Emergency Waivers

Members of the public may submit comments on draft guidance documents noticed in the Federal Register through Regulations.gov. Comments on any guidance document; requests for issuance, reconsideration, modification, or rescission of any guidance document; or concerns about PHMSA’s compliance with the OMB Good Guidance Bulletin regarding existing guidance documents may be submitted to PHMSA_Guidance@dot.gov. Please identify the guidance document in your request.

**Search Instructions**
                      - To search for PHMSA Guidance Documents (not including Interpretations), use the Keywords or Issued Date fields on the left side of the search box below. Your search results will display in the table below.
                      - To search for PHMSA Regulations Interpretations, use the Interpretations Keyword Search on the right side of the search box, or click the “PHMSA Interpretations Advanced Search” link. Results using the Interpretations Keyword Search will open in a new browser window.

PHMSA Interpretations Advanced Search

# Pagination

-  «« First 
-  ‹‹‹ 
- …
-  24 
-  25 
-  26 
-  27 
-  28 
-  29 
-  30 
-  31 
-  32
§ 20.401 What is included under Services to Children, Elderly, and Families? Services to Children, Elderly, and Families include, but are not limited to, the following: ( a ) Assistance in solving problems related to family functioning and interpersonal relationships;
( b ) Referral to the appropriate resource for problems related to illness, physical or mental handicaps, drug abuse, alcoholism, and violation of the law; and
( c ) Protective services.
In addition, economic opportunity and money management may also be provided.
#### § 39.900 Establishment and funding of an Interim Maintenance and Minor Repair Fund.

There is established in the Division of Facilities Management a separate temporary fund entitled the Interim Maintenance and Minor Repair Fund. The Assistant Secretary shall cause the distribution of an amount of $1 million, under the FY 1980 Appropriation for the Bureau, from budget activity 3500, “General Management and Facilities Operation”, to the direct use of schools, and shall create an appropriate account or subaccount for the Interim Maintenance and Minor Repair Fund and credit these funds thereto.
### SUBCHAPTER I—OFFICERS, ADMINISTRATION, AND THE ESTATE
# C_2006326EN.01003101.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/31

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del Pais Vasco (Spain) lodged on 18 October 2006 — Comunidad Autónoma de La Rioja v Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya, Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, Cámara de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Bilbao, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

(Case C-429/06)

(2006/C 326/63)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del Pais Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Comunidad Autónoma de La Rioja

Applicant:

Defendants: Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya, Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, Cámara de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Bilbao, Confederación Empresarial Vasca

Defendants:

Question referred

Must Article 87(1) EC be construed as meaning that, by providing for a rate of tax lower than the basic rate set in Spanish State legislation and for deductions from the amount of tax payable which do not exist in State tax legislation, provisions in the field of taxation adopted by the Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Bizkaia amending Articles 29(1)(a), 37 and 39 of the Provincial Law on Company Tax, which take effect in the jurisdiction of that infra-State autonomous body, must be regarded as selective and as covered by the definition of State aid enshrined in Article 87(1) EC and, accordingly, must be notified to the Commission pursuant to Article 88(3) EC?

---
#### STATE v. MOORE

No. 136P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 507

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-16 

March 14, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(a) Plans Covered. Requirements of Coverage 

OPINION: 

 This is a confirmation of the telephone call sometime last fall to your office by Mr. * * * of our staff regarding your

inquiries relating to coverage under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. 

You initially inquired as to whether a pension plan maintained by a tax exempt, non-profit trade association is

covered under Section 4021 of the Act. You stated that the plan is tax qualified, funded and has less than 25 participants.

If the plan is an employee pension benefit plan, as defined in the Act, and is not excluded from coverage under Section

4021(b) of the Act, the plan is coverd. 

You further advise that the * * * sponsored a * * * plan under which contributions and participation ceased in 1959

and that appropriate arrangements concerning vesting and "acceptance of new coverage" were made pursuant to the

group annuity contract through which the plan was funded. If benefits ceased to accrue and contributions ceased at that

time, it appears that the plan terminated at that time, and thus is not covered by Title IV. If accruals continued, please

send us copies of the group annuity contract and we will [*2] attempt to determine whether premiums must be paid with

respect to plan participants. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Exhibit 4.11b


 


CERTIFICATE
OF TRUST


OF


CT
PUBLIC PREFERRED TRUST I


 


This Certificate of Trust of CT Public Preferred Trust I (the “Trust”),
dated as of May 14, 2008, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware
Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801, et  seq.)(the “Act”).


 


1.             Name.  The name of the statutory trust being formed
hereby is CT Public Preferred Trust I.


 


2.             Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust, with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware, are BNYM
(Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.


 


3.             Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
as of its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate
of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act as of the
date first above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  GEOFFREY G. JERVIS, not in his individual 

  capacity, but solely as trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Geoffrey G. Jervis

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  BNYM (DELAWARE), not in its individual 

  capacity, but solely as trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ Kristine K. Gullo

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:  Kristine K. Gullo

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Vice President
#### § 542.40 What is a Tier C gaming operation?

A Tier C gaming operation is one with annual gross gaming revenues of more than $15 million.