alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)RSM

 

RSMUS LLP

 

Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Tothe Board of Directors

SitusHoldings, LLC 

 

 

Wehave examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying CertificationRegarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (Management’sAssertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Regulation AB (the applicable servicingcriteria) for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractualobligations to perform Regulation AB reporting for the Operating or TrustAdvisor Services Platform (the “Platform”), including only those asset-backedsecurities transactions defined below, as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2018. Appendix B to management’s assertion identifies theindividual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting thePlatform. Management is responsible for Situs Holdings, LLC’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis ofthe servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether theCompany performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteriaduring the specified period and performing such other procedures as weconsidered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited toselected servicing activities performed by the Company during the periodcovered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have includedservicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform.Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising fromerrors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with theaforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2018, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/**RSM US LLP**

 

Duluth,Minnesota

January 31,2019

 

 

 

 

THEPOWER OF BEING UNDERSTOOD

AUDIT| TAX | CONSULTING 

                                                                                                         

 

 RSMUS LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network ofindependent audit, tax and consulting firms.  Visit rsmus.com/aboutus formore information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB-A1 for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), We, Duane S. Jenson, President and Shelley Goff, Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

| *Date:*** | *06/29/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Duane S. Jenson***                      |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|---------------------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Duane S. Jenson, President and Director*** |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | * *                                    |
| *Date:*** | *06/29/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Shelley Goff***                         |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Shelley Goff, Secretary and Director***    |
§ 30.103 How will the Secretary implement Standards, Assessments, and Accountability System requirements? ( a ) The Secretary, through the Director, must describe requirements for standards, assessments, and an accountability system for use at BIE-funded schools in accordance with this part. The Director must periodically review and revise these requirements, as necessary, but review will occur not less often than every four (4) years beginning with the school year for which the requirements become effective.
( b ) The Director will develop an Agency Plan that will provide Indian Tribes, schools, parents, and other stakeholders with quality, transparent information about how the Act will be implemented at BIE-funded schools, including the requirements that have been established for standards, assessments, and an accountability system for BIE-funded schools.
( c ) The Secretary will engage in meaningful consultation with Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Villages, schools, parents, and other stakeholders, when developing and revising requirements for standards, assessments, and an accountability system for BIE-funded schools.
( d ) The Secretary may voluntarily partner with States, or another Federal agency, in the development of challenging academic standards and assessments.
# C_2006197EN.01000101.xml

| 22.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 August 2006

(2006/C 197/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2919 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4612 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68080 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2095 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5785 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5759 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,137 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,56 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9026 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5258 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,58 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,653 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8672 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6920 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4440 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0448 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0158 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0286 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 235,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,0358 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2908 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2880 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 711,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,741 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,055 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4360 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,389 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2919

JPY

Japanese yen

149,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4612

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68080

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2095

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5785

ISK

Iceland króna

90,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5759

CZK

Czech koruna

28,137

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,56

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9026

RON

Romanian leu

3,5258

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,58

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,653

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8672

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6920

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4440

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0448

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0158

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0286

KRW

South Korean won

1 235,83

ZAR

South African rand

9,0358

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2908

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2880

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 711,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,741

PHP

Philippine peso

66,055

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4360

THB

Thai baht

48,389

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee November 2, 2023 Meeting Minutes

LIBSAC-Minutes-Nov-2-2023.pdf (10.64 MB)

Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes - November 2, 2023

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

79-5 

March 28, 1979 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4007(a). Payment of Premiums. Due Dates

29 CFR 2602 Payment of Premiums 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter to Matthew M. Lind, Executive Director of the Pension Benefit Guaranty

Corporation (the "PBGC"), concerning the liability of the Pension Plan of * * * (the "Plan") for payment of insurance

premiums to the PBGC, under Section 4007(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. 

You specifically asked whether the Plan must pay premiums for certain retirees whose Plan benefits are to be

provided pursuant to an insurance contract. Under the PBGC's Premium Payment Regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 2602.1 et

seq. (1977), a plan is not liable for premium payments for any "former employee or retiree to whom an insurance

company has made an irrevocable commitment to pay the benefits to which the individual is entitled under the plan." 

As I understand the facts, the Trustee of the Plan entered into a contract (the "Contract") with the * * * Life

Insurance Company * * * to purchase annuities for certain named retirees entitled to benefits under the Plan.

Subsequently, * * * Life and * * *, the employer, agreed that each month * * * Life would transfer to * * * an amount

equal [*2] to all annuities payable for that month, and that * * * would pay each annuitant his or her monthly benefit.

The annuitants are unaware of the fact that their benefits are funded through the Contract, and certificates describing the

annuities purchased have not been issued to the annuitants. 

We view the aforementioned exclusion from participant status of certain former employees and retirees as being

based on a novation concept, wherein an insurer takes the place of a pension plan with the consent of the beneficiaries.

Under the facts of this case, we think that such consent has not been obtained, and that, therefore, * * * Life has not made

an irrevocable communitment to the annuitants to pay their benefits under the Plan. Accordingly, the Plan must pay

premiums to the PBGC for the annuitants covered by the Contract. (I note that Section 4.1 of the Contract provides that

* * * Life shall issue certificates to annuitants receiving benefits under the Contract. In the event that such certificates

are issued, the PBGC would reconsider the position taken in this letter.) 

I hope I have been of assistance. If you have any questions, please contact * * *, the attorney assigned to [*3] this

case, at (202) 254-3010. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
# C_2006331EN.01002506.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 29 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma — Italie) — Nissan Italia Srl v Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Roma 3

(Case C-164/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 331/53)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)   OJ C 154, 1.7.2006.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Michael P. Huseby, the Chief Financial Officer of Renaissance Media
Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC
and Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (collectively, the Company) in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Michael P. HusebyMichael P. HusebyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)August 13, 2004
#### § 18.105 How does a tribe request approval for a tribal probate code?

The tribe must submit the tribal probate code and a duly executed tribal resolution adopting the code to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Attn: Tribal Probate Code, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240, for review and approval or disapproval.
# C_2007056EN.01001801.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/18

---

Appeal brought on 19 December 2006 by European Association of Euro Pharmaceutical Companies (EAEPC) against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 27 September 2006 in Case T-168/01: GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-515/06 P)

(2007/C 56/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Association of Euro Pharmaceutical Companies (EAEPC) (represented by: M. Hartmann-Rüppel and W. Rehmann, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities, Bundesverband der Arzneimittel-Importeure eV, Spain Pharma, SA, Asociación de exportadores españoles de productos farmacéuticos (Aseprofar), GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited, anciennement Glaxo Wellcome plc

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2006, case no. T-168/01, to the extent the Court of First Instance annulled the Commission decision 2001/70/E (1) of 8 May 2001. |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2006, case no. T-168/01, to the extent the Court of First Instance annulled the Commission decision 2001/70/E (1) of 8 May 2001.

1

| — | to award the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

to award the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant claims the following infringements of Community law by the appealed judgment:

| (a) | Misapplication of Art. 81(3) EC-the Court of First Instance disregarded the role and function of Art. 81(3) when alleging the assessment undertaken by the Commission was insufficient. |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Misapplication of Art. 81(3) EC-the Court of First Instance disregarded the role and function of Art. 81(3) when alleging the assessment undertaken by the Commission was insufficient.

| (b) | Misapplication of Article 81(3) EC by misjudging the burden of rendering evidence and proof |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Misapplication of Article 81(3) EC by misjudging the burden of rendering evidence and proof

| (c) | Misapplication of Article 81(3) EC in consequence of misinterpretation or non-consideration of evidence on file, which proves that the applicant (GSK) did not plead on the requirements of Article 81(3) EC sufficiently and by offering sustainable evidence. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

Misapplication of Article 81(3) EC in consequence of misinterpretation or non-consideration of evidence on file, which proves that the applicant (GSK) did not plead on the requirements of Article 81(3) EC sufficiently and by offering sustainable evidence.

---

(1)  OJ L 302, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 700.527 Endorsements.

Employees are prohibited from endorsing in an official capacity business products or processes or the services of commercial firms for advertising publicity or sale purposes. Use of materials, products or services, by the Commission does not constitute official endorsement. Employees may not recommend for or against any particular builder, supplier, realtor, contractor or other person or business seeking to sell any product or service to relocatees.
Exhibit 10-02





www.legacywineandspirits.com




May 15, 2008




Legacy Wine & Spirit Merchants Ltd.

Shop 7 G/F 38-48 Wharf Road

North Point, Hong Kong




Dear Sirs:

Re: Agreement dated May 5, 2008 between 

Legacy Wine & Spirits International Ltd. (“LI”)

and Legacy Wine & Spirits Merchants Ltd. (“LM”)




The above mentioned agreement was duly signed on May 5, 2008. Legacy Wine & Spirits International Ltd. (the “Company”) filed documentation to effect a name change from Legacy Mining Ltd., to be effective May 2, 2008.  This name change was approved by the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”), however, another governing body, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. (“FINRA”) was recently given the authority to effect name changes as well. FINRA is the largest non-governmental regulator for all securities firms doing business in the United States. FINRA is dedicated to investor protection and market integrity through effective and efficient regulation and complementary compliance and technology-based services.




We are awaiting the final approval from FINRA for the name change and as such, need your consent to agree that the agreement dated May 5, 2008 named above will take effect 

on the same day the Company receives its approval from FINRA. Please provide your consent by signing below and returning one copy to our office.




Yours truly,

Legacy Wine & Spirits International Ltd.                       Legacy Wine & Spirits Merchants

Ltd. consents the agreement takes

                                                                                    effect the day of the name change.

/s/: R. Klein




Robert Klein                                                                 Signed:  /s/: M. Liu
President                                                                       Date:    May 23,  2008




Legacy Wine & Spirits International Ltd.   385 52 Ave., Pointe-Calumet, Quebec, J0N 1G4   

 Phone: 1-888-488-6882      Fax: 1-888-265-0498     E-mail:  info@legacywineandspirits.com
### SUBCHAPTER II—MULTILATERAL CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates







NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION






OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE






The undersigned, Jeffrey L. Edwards, Vice-President, Operations of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as an Authorized Officer of the Company:






(1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of:  i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement, of the Company during the period March 21, 2012 through March 31, 2012 (the “Reporting Period”); and






(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, i) the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period; and ii) no Servicer Default has occurred.






This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to (i) Section 3.01(c) of the Servicing Agreement, as amended, dated as of March 1, 1999, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, NILT Trust, as UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer; and (ii) Section 8.11(b) of the 2012-A SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of March 21, 2012 , by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as Titling Trust, NILT Trust, as Grantor and UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer (the “Agreement”).






Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2012.




/s/ Jeffrey L. Edwards


Jeffrey L. Edwards


Vice President, Operations
-  Home 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 171

## Part 171: GENERAL INFORMATION, REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View part 171 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses

## Regulation Sections