alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1  HAMMER FIBER OPTICS HOLDINGS CORP.  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp. (the Company) for the year ended July 31, 2016 (the Report), I, Mark Stogdill, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   March 15, 2017 /s/ Mark StogdillPrincipal Executive Officer
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 20

- 00240

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

462nd District Court of Denton County, Texas

Trial Cou rt No. 18

- 1842

- 442

Before Bassel, Gabriel, and Kerr, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### H.B. , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion

for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied . Accordingly,

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : July 30, 2020
### Examinations and Reports
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-1234, 00-1342, 00-1343, 00-1344, 00-1345, 00-1399, 00-1400, 00-

1401, 00-1402, 00-1403, 00-1404

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM M. DAVIS, et al.,

Defendant, Appellee.

________________________

ASHLAND, INC., et al., Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued on August 17, 2001, is amended

as follows:

On the cover sheets of Volumes I and II, the following should be

added as a fourth paragraph under listed counsel:

Mark O. Denehy, Joseph Avanzato, and Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.,

on the brief for appellees BASF Corporation, CNA Holdings, Inc., DorrOliver Incorporated; Englehard Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Lucent

Technologies, Inc., Mine Safety Appliances Company, Ortho Diagnostics

Systems, Inc., Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, Permacel, Inc.,

Quantum, Inc., and Warner-Lambert Company.
§ 700.513 Business dealings on behalf of the government. ( a ) All employees shall conduct themselves on the job so as to efficiently discharge the work of the Commission. Employees shall observe courtesy, consideration and promptness in dealing with clients, other governmental agencies, and members of the public.
( b ) Commission personnel conducting business with contractors, realtors, vendors, service providers and other public and private agencies, organizations, business and individuals shall maintain strict impartiality in their business dealings. Commission employees shall not allow themselves to be placed in a position in which a conflict of interest might arise or might justifiably be suspected. Such a conflict may arise or appear to arise by the acceptance of gratuities or by any action which could reasonably be interpreted as influencing the strict impartiality that must prevail in all business relationships involving the Commission. However, this requirement of impartiality is not intended to prohibit advocacy of client interests, as is required as a stated duty of certain agency positions. Such advocacy may occur for example during warrantee representation or during technical representation with builders.
EXHIBIT 35.2

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated January 8, 2013, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated January 9, 2013, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2013-1US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Russell Piggott, am a Director of Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited (the Manager).
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Managers activities during the period from April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been made
under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Manager has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|Date: 17 June 2016                         
|                                           
|/s/ Russell Piggott                        
|Russell Piggott Director                   
|                                           
|Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  FAQs For Employers and Practitioners 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# FAQs for Employers and Practitioners

 

Are you an employer or practitioner responsible for one or more plans insured by PBGC? Find the answers to frequently asked questions below.

## For Employers & Practitioners

                          - Missing Participants
                          - Partition Regulation
                          - Partition FAQs for Practitioners
                          - Online Premium Filing with My PAA
                          - Multiemployer Insolvent Plan Administrative Expense
                          - Kline-Miller Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014
                          - PBGC-Initiated Terminations
                          - Standard Terminations
                          - Distress Terminations
                          - Staff Responses to Practitioners Questions
                          - Enrolled Actuaries Meetings - Blue Books

August 18, 2023

##           Stay Connected with Us          

Receive email notices when PBGC issues a press release.

Join the conversation and connect via the icons below.

﻿
§ 39.118 How does a student receive gifted and talented services in subsequent years? For each student receiving gifted and talented services, the school must conduct a yearly evaluation of progress, file timely progress reports, and update the specific education plan. ( a ) If a school identifies a student as gifted and talented based on § 39.114 (a), (b), or (c), then the student does not need to reapply for the gifted and talented program. However, the student must be reevaluated at least every 3 years through the 10th grade to verify eligibility for funding.
( b ) If a school identifies a student as gifted and talented based on § 39.114 (d) or (e), the student must be reevaluated annually for the gifted and talented program.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 536

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve System should take action to reduce

interest rates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27, 2000

Mr. BALDACCI (for himself, Mr. FROST, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. KILDEE, Mr.

JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. GREEN of Texas,

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. DOYLE,

Mr. HOLDEN, and Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Banking and

Financial Services

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

should take action to reduce interest rates.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Board of Governors of the Federal

3 Reserve System should take such action as may be appro4 priate to reduce interest rates in the United States or at

5 least to prevent further increases in such rates.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2012-CCRE2 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of August 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activitiesduring the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has beenmade under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-37 

November 16, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(2) Plans Covered. Government Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request for a determination by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation as to whether

the above plan (the "Plan") is excluded from coverage under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

of 1974 (the "Act") by Section 4021(b)(2) of the Act. We have concluded that the Plan is a governmental plan and thus

is excluded from coverage by that section. 

As you have represented the facts, the * * * (the "Association") is an unincorporated association consisting "of the

commissioner, director, superintendent, or other official who by law is charged with the responsibility of supervising the

business of insurance within each state, territory, or insular possession of the United States." Officers of the Association

must be members or their duly authorized representatives (a duly authorized representative of a member "shall be some

person officially connected with his department, who is wholly or principally employed by said department"). 

Article 2 of the Constitution of the Association states: 

The object of this Association shall be to promote uniformity in legislation affecting insurance [sic] to encourage

[*2] uniformity in departmental rulings under the insurance laws of the several states; to disseminate information of

value to insurance supervisory officials in the performance of their duties; to establish ways and means of fully protecting

the interests of insurance policyholders of the various states, territories and insular possessions of the United States; and

to preserve to the several states the regulation of the business of insurance. 

 By letters dated May 23, 1955, and August 30, 1974, the Internal Revenue Service notified the Association of its

determination "that the Association is an instrumentality wholly owned by the States the representatives of which

comprise its membership." By letter dated May 1, 1969, the Social Security Administration notified the Association of

its determination that the Association is an " interstate instrumentality" having the status of a state for purposes of the

Social Security Act. By letter dated December 10, 1973, the United States Department of Labor notified the Association

of its determination that the Association is a state agency or instrumentality. 

Based on the above, we have determined that the Association is a governmental agency [*3] or instrumentality

within the meaning of Section 4021(b)(2) and, therefore, that the Plan is not covered by Title IV. 

I hope I have been of assistance. If you have any questions, please contact the attorney assigned to this case, * *

* at (202) 254-3010. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 700.339 Residency on life estate leases. ( a ) No person may reside on a life estate lease other than the life tenant, his or her spouse, and minor dependents and such persons who are necessarily present, as determined by the Commission, to provide for the care of the life tenant.
( b ) In determining who is necessarily present for the care of the life tenant, the Commission shall consider the following criteria: ( 1 ) The age of the life tenant.
( 2 ) The nature and extent of the life tenant's disability, if any.
( 3 ) The location of the life estate lease, including but not limited to, the following factors: ( i ) Topography,
( ii ) Proximity to water,
( iii ) Proximity to fuel,
( iv ) Proximity to shopping and medical services, and
( v ) Any other factors deemed relevant to the Commission.
( 4 ) The nature and extent of care to be provided to a disabled life tenant.
( 5 ) Any other factors deemed relevant by the Commission.
( c ) In the event it becomes necessary to change the identity of the person(s) or number of persons identified as necessarily present for the care of the life tenant, the life tenant shall make such request for change to the Commission. The Commission, upon review of the request, may grant an amended life estate lease to reflect the requested change.
### §9021a. Air Force Reserve Forces Policy Committee

There is in the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force an Air Force Reserve Forces Policy Committee. The functions, membership, and organization of that committee are set forth in section 10305 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(b)(4)(B), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2982, §8021; renumbered §9021, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(c), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833; renumbered §9021a, Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, §954(a)(1), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1564.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–92 renumbered section 9021 of this title as this section.

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8021 of this title as section 9021 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
### Geology and ore deposits of the Rico District, Colorado

By: Edwin Thor McKnight

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp723

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Lead and zinc deposits at Rico, Colorado(1944)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
(November 21, 2006)

#### Elizabeth Combier, Appellant, v Fred Anderson et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 276]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lottie E. *334Wilkins, J.), entered July 6, 2005, after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants-respondents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Consideration of most of the issues raised by plaintiff in this appeal from the judgment is precluded by law of the case as a result of plaintiff’s prior appeal from the order denying her motion to set aside the verdict (26 AD3d 269 [2006]). Plaintiffs objection to the bill of costs is wholly without merit given defendants’ success at trial and that the only item included in the bill are statutory costs under CPLR 8201. We decline to review the issues involving the order that granted defendants partial summary judgment in view of the dismissal of plaintiffs appeal from that order for failure to perfect *(see Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.,*93 NY2d 750 [1999]). Because plaintiff could not raise on her prior appeal her contention that the trial court erred in declaring a mistrial at the initial trial *(see Slavin v Berlin,*172 AD2d 514 [1991]; *Graney Dev. Corp. v Taksen,*66 AD2d 1008 [1978]), review of that contention is not barred by law of the case. However, nothing in the record before us supports plaintiffs claim that the trial court’s declaration of a mistrial was improper. We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Mazzarelli, Saxe and McGuire, JJ.
# C_2006178EN.01002201.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 May 2006 — Stadtgemeinde Frohnleiten und Gemeindebetriebe Frohnleiten GmbH v Bundesminister für Land-und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft

(Case C-221/06)

(2006/C 178/35)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Stadtgemeinde Frohnleiten und Gemeindebetriebe Frohnleiten GmbH

Applicants

Defendant: Bundesminister für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft

Defendant

Question referred

Do Articles 10 EC, 12 EC, 23 EC, 25 EC, 49 EC or 90 EC preclude a national tax provision which makes the deposit of waste at a waste disposal site subject to a tax (Altlastenbeitrag; disused hazardous site levy), but provides for exemption from that tax for the deposit of waste which demonstrably derives from the safeguarding or rehabilitation of contaminated sites (potentially hazardous sites or disused hazardous sites) if the sites (potentially hazardous sites or disused hazardous sites) are entered in official registers provided for by law (Verdachtsflächenkataster; register of potentially hazardous sites, or Altlastenatlas; disused hazardous sites register), and only sites in Austria may be entered in those registers, with the result that the tax exemption is also possible only in respect of the deposit of waste which originates from potentially hazardous sites or disused hazardous sites located in Austria?

Altlastenbeitrag

Verdachtsflächenkataster

Altlastenatlas

---
# C_2007056EN.01002501.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/25

---

Action brought on 29 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-29/07)

(2007/C 56/47)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/110/EC (1) of 25 November 2003 on assistance in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/110/EC (1) of 25 November 2003 on assistance in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2003/110 into domestic law expired on 6 December 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 321, 6.12.2003, p. 26.

1

---