alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1







Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon,
as Trustee.



I, James Hall, Vice President of The Bank of New
York Mellon, a New York corporation (the Trustee), states:



| | (a) | A
    review of the Trustees activities for the period of January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting
    Period) and of the Trustees performance under the Trust Agreement dated June 11, 2012 between Fixed lncome
    Client Solutions LLC as depositor (the Depositor) and the Trustee, as the trustee and securities
    intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and the Trustee (as amended in each such
    case,     the Trust agreement), has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge and based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for Fixed lncome Trust for Prudential Financial, lnc. Notes, Series 2012-1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               



|                        | The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                        |                                        
|Date:
    March 9, 2015 |                                        
|                        | James Hall                             
|                        | Vice President
### SUBCHAPTER III—THE ESTATE
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 306 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 306

Expressing the desire of the House of Representatives to not spend any 
   of the budget surplus created by Social Security receipts and to 
            continue to retire the debt held by the public.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1999

 Mr. Herger submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
 the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 
 and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

                           September 28, 1999

The Committees on the Budget and Ways and Means discharged; considered 
              under suspension of the rules and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the desire of the House of Representatives to not spend any 
   of the budget surplus created by Social Security receipts and to 
            continue to retire the debt held by the public.

Whereas, earlier this year, the House of Representatives passed a Social 
        Security lockbox designed to protect the Social Security surplus by an 
        overwhelming vote of 416 to 12;
Whereas bipartisan efforts over the past few years have eliminated the budget 
        deficit and created a projected combined Social Security and non-Social 
        Security surplus of $2,896,000,000,000 over the next 10 years;
Whereas this surplus is largely due to the collection of the Social Security 
        taxes and interest on already collected receipts in the trust fund;
Whereas the President and the Congress have not reached an agreement to use any 
        of the non-Social Security surplus on providing tax relief; and
Whereas any unspent portion of the projected surplus will have the effect of 
        reducing the debt held by the public: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the the House of Representatives 
that the House--
            (1) should not consider legislation that would spend any of 
        the Social Security surplus; and
            (2) should continue to pursue efforts to continue to reduce 
        the $3,618,000,000,000 in debt held by the public.
                                 <all>
```
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Working with PHMSA 
-  Hazardous Materials Grants 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Grants Program Overview 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness (HMEP) Grant 
                      -  Assistance for Local Emergency Response Training (ALERT) 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Instructor Training (HMIT) Grant 
                      -  Supplemental Public Sector Training (SPST) Grant 
                      -  Community Safety (CS) Grant 
                      -  Reports to Congress 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Roundtable 
                      -  Hazmat Incident Response Training Resources 

## Contact Us

Hazardous Materials Training Program
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**Training@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4900****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922****Fax:**202-366-7342**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Payment and Appeals of Civil Penalties

Civil penalties assessed by PHMSA can be paid by following the guidance provided at https://www.pay.gov/public/home. The procedures to appeal a civil penalty assessed by PHMSA can be found in the 49 CFR §107.313 through §107.325.
Exhibit 99.7
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Crescent Point Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory T. Tisdale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:           March 12, 2014                                              CRESCENT POINT ENERGY CORP.
  /s/ Gregory T. Tisdale_________________
 Name: Gregory T. Tisdale
 Title:   Chief Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 9—NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CREDIT CORPORATIONS**
§ 158.654 Other payments. ( a ) The Department provides the following other types of payments to a DHS-CS employee under this section and in accordance with the relevant provisions of law referenced in this section: ( 1 ) Severance pay under this section, and the Department provides any severance pay in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5595 and 5 CFR part 550, subpart G, except that separation from the DHS-CS because of a lapse or nonrenewal of a DHS-CS employee's appointment under this part or because of a DHS-CS employee's refusal to accepted a directed subsequent assignment, described in § 158.708, is not an involuntary separation, and the former DHS-CS employee is not entitled to severance pay.
( 2 ) Lump-sum leave payouts under this section, and the Department provides any lump-sum leave payouts in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5551 and 5552 and 5 CFR part 550, subpart L.
( 3 ) Voluntary separation incentive payments under this section, and the Department provides any such payments in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 3521-3525 and 5 CFR part 576.
( 4 ) Reservist differential under this section, and the Department provides any such differential in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5538.
( 5 ) Quarters allowances under this section, and the Department provides any such allowances in accordance with 5 U.S.C. Chapter 59, Subchapter II, the Department of State Standardized Regulations and any implementing supplements issued by the Department of State, and 5 CFR part 591, subpart C.
( 6 ) Overseas differentials and allowances under this section, and the Department provides any such differentials and allowances in accordance with 5 U.S.C. Chapter 59, Subchapter III, the Department of State Standardized Regulations and any implementing supplements issued by the Department of State, and 5 CFR part 591, subpart C.
( 7 ) Remote worksite allowances, foreign currency allowances, and hostile fire pay under this section, and the Department provides any such allowances and pay in accordance with 5 U.S.C. Chapter 59, Subchapter IV.
( 8 ) Other similar payments described in CTMS policy as being authorized under this part and provided in accordance with relevant provisions of other laws.
( b ) A payment for any quarter allowances, overseas differentials and allowances, and remote worksite allowances, foreign currency allowances, and hostile fire pay under paragraphs (a)(5) through (7) of this section is subject to and may be limited by the aggregate compensation limit described in § 158.604. A payment for any severance pay, lump-sum leave payout, voluntary separation inventive payment, and reservist differential under paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section is not subject to the aggregate compensation limit described in § 158.604. A payment under paragraph (a)(8) of this section may be subject to and limited by the aggregate compensation limit described in § 158.604, as described in CTMS policy.
( c ) Any payment under this section is not salary under this part and is not basic pay for any purpose under Title 5 U.S.C. or 5 CFR.
#### § 583.1 What does this part cover?

This part applies to appeals from the Chair's decision to approve or disapprove a management contract or amendment to a management contract under parts 533 and 535 of this chapter.
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Organization 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

# Office of Hazardous Materials Safety Organization Chart

PHH-OrgChart-OHMS-04-08-2024.pdf (879.73 KB)

Hazardous Materials org chart

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
# C_2007042EN.01000702.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) — Johan Piek v Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij

(Case C-384/05) (1)

1

(Milk and milk products - Additional levy on milk - Special reference quantity - Second subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 857/84)

(2007/C 42/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Johan Piek

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector (OJ 1984 L 90, p. 13) — Determination of reference quantities exempt from levy — National measures providing for the allocation of special reference quantities to producers who have incurred investment obligations, whether or not under a development plan, between 1 September 1981 and 31 March 1984 — Compatibility with Community legislation providing for the period between 1 January 1981 and 31 March 1984

Operative part of the judgment

The second subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector must be interpreted as not precluding a national rule such as that at issue in the main proceedings which restricts the category of milk producers who may obtain a special reference quantity to those who incurred investment obligations after 1 September 1981 but before 1 March 1984.

---

(1)  OJ C 330, 24.12.2005.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 
| Dated March 17, 2015 |              |
|---------------------------|-------------------|
|                      |              |
|                      | /s/ Erin M. Rohde |
|                      |              | Erin M. Rohde |
|                      |              | Assistant Treasurer of |
|                      |              | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, |
|                      |              | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner |
|                      |              | Trust 2012-B |

 

----
§ 20.308 What does earned income include? Earned income is cash or any in-kind payment earned in the form of wages, salary, commissions, or profit, from activities by an employee or self-employed individual. Earned income includes: ( a ) Any one-time payment to an individual for activities which were sustained over a period of time (for example, the sale of farm crops, livestock, or professional artists producing art work); and
( b ) With regard to self-employment, total profit from a business enterprise (i.e., gross receipts less expenses incurred in producing the goods or services). Business expenses do not include depreciation, personal business and entertainment expenses, personal transportation, capital equipment purchases, or principal payments on loans for capital assets or durable goods.
§ 5.2 Appointment actions. ( a ) Preference will be afforded a person meeting any one of the standards of § 5.1 whether the appointment involves initial hiring, reinstatement, transfer, reassignment or promotion.
( b ) Preference eligibles may be given a Schedule A excepted appointment under Exception Number 213.3112(a)(7). However, if the individuals are within reach on a Civil Service Register, they may be given a competitive appointment.
[43 FR 2393, Jan. 17, 1978. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 12702, Mar. 30, 1984]
exv10w1












EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO

STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT




     This Amendment No. 3 to the Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”) dated
May 28, 2008, is made by and between EZPAWN Florida, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the
“Buyer”) and Value Financial Services, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”).



RECITALS




     Whereas, the Buyer and the Company executed and delivered that certain Stock Purchase
Agreement on March 14, 2008, as amended April 28, 2008 and May 12, 2008, for the purchase and sale
of up to 6,646,359 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Purchase Agreement”);



          Whereas, the Buyer and the Company desire to extend the deadline for completion of
the Due Diligence Investigation and closing of the transaction;




     Now therefore, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises herein made,
and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Buyer and the Company agree as follows:




	1.	 	Definitions. Section 1 of the Purchase Agreement is amended by amending the
definition of “Due Diligence End Date” to provide that the Due Diligence End Date
shall mean 5:00 p.m CDT on June 4, 2008.






	2.	 	Tender Offer. Section 6.1 of the Purchase Agreement is amended by deleting
the words “June 3, 2008” and inserting in its place “June 9, 2008”.






	3.	 	Closing. Section 3.2 of the Purchase Agreement is amended by deleting the
words, “July 11, 2008” and inserting in their place, “July 17, 2008”.






	4.	 	Termination. Subsection 9.1(f) of the Purchase Agreement is amended by
deleting the words, “July 11, 2008” and inserting in their place, “July 18, 2008”.





{Signature Page Follows}




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the
date and year first above written.



EZPAWN Florida, Inc.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Dan Tonissen
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Daniel Tonissen, Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer	 	 






Value Financial Services, Inc.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ John Thedford
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	John Thedford, President and 

Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Eva Casas v. Castano Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Cube 

Investments

Appellate case number: 01-20-00326-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-70094

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

On August 14, 2020, appellant, Eva Casas, timely filed her appellant’s brief. On 

August 19, 2020, appellee, Castano Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Cube Investments, filed a 

motion to dismiss the appeal, asserting that appellant’s brief fails to comply with the 

requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 in that it fails to include: an 

identity of parties and counsel, a table of contents, an index of authorities, a statement of 

the case, issues presented for review, a statement of facts, clear references to the appellate 

record, a summary of the argument, or an appendix including the trial court’s judgment 

being appealed and the contract at issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(a)-(g), (k). For this 

reason, appellee argues that appellant’s brief “should be stri[c]ken, and the appeal should 

be dismissed.”

Appellant subsequently filed a “Motion for Leave to File Appellant’s Amended 

Brief” on August 21, 2020. Along with the motion for leave, appellant also filed an 

amended appellant’s brief in compliance with Rule 38.1. We may allow a party to amend 

or supplement their brief “on whatever reasonable terms the court may prescribe.” See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.7.

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion for leave to file her amended brief. The 

Clerk of this Court is directed to accept the filing of the amended appellant’s brief as of 

August 21, 2020. Appellee’s brief, if any, will be due no later than thirty days after the 

date of the filing of appellant’s amended brief, August 21, 2020. 

Further, we deny appellee’s motion to dismiss. 

It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Terry Adams____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __September 1, 2020___
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), We, Thomas J. Howells, President and Travis Jenson, Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Thomas J. Howells
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Thomas J. Howells
                                         President and director


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Travis Jenson
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Travis Jenson
                                         Secretary and director
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 233-6440 |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

 REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA  For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank** (the "Servicer"). National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR''). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions"). NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole. Plante& Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on 'the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.  National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer/s/ Lori D. EshooLori D. Eshoo, President/CEOJanuary 18, 2016