alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

October 27, 2015

Ms. Janet McCabe

Acting Assistant Administrator, Air and Radiation

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mailcode 6101A

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20460

Re: Supplemental Materials Concerning EPA’s Proposed Renewable Fuel Standard Program: Standards 

for 2014, 2015, and 2016 and Biomass-Based Diesel Volume for 2017 (Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-

0111)

Dear Ms. McCabe:

On behalf of Growth Energy, I am submitting three documents that bear on EPA’s consideration of its 

proposed Renewable Fuel Standard Program: Standards for 2014, 2015, and 2016 and Biomass-Based 

Diesel Volume for 2017. These documents became available after the close of the comment period.

One document is an article by Profs. Bruce Babcock and Sebastien Pouliot entitled “How Much Ethanol 

Can Be Consumed in E85.” 

The other documents are an article published by AgWired entitled “E15 Approved for 2016 Fiat Chrysler 

Models” and an excerpt from the 2016 Fiat Chrysler Jeep Cherokee Owner’s Manual.

Sincerely,

Tom Buis

CEO, Growth Energy

CC: Ethan Shenkman

David Orlin

Roland Dubois

Ben Hengst

Paul Argyropolous

David Korotney

Enclosures
# C_2006234EN.01000101.xml

| 29.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 September 2006

(2006/C 234/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2713 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4600 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67715 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2623 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5838 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,75 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2230 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5767 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,428 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9785 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5401 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,380 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9128 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6959 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4132 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9027 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9377 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0177 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 201,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7305 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0388 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3750 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 727,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,687 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,807 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,722 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2713

JPY

Japanese yen

149,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4600

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67715

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2623

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5838

ISK

Iceland króna

88,75

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2230

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5767

CZK

Czech koruna

28,428

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9785

RON

Romanian leu

3,5401

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,380

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9128

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6959

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4132

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9027

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9377

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0177

KRW

South Korean won

1 201,06

ZAR

South African rand

9,7305

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0388

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3750

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 727,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,687

PHP

Philippine peso

63,807

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0150

THB

Thai baht

47,722

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### Geology of the Skagway B-3 and B-4 quadrangles, southeastern Alaska

By: E.M. MacKevett Jr.Eugene C. RobertsonGary R. Winkler

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp832

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2006326EN.01002102.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland

(Case C-159/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/42/EC - Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment - Failure to implement within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 326/42)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker, F. Simonetti and K. Nyberg, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: E. Bygglin, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to implement within the prescribed period, with regard to the autonomous province of Åland, Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ 2001 L 197, p. 30)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, the Republic of Finland has failed, with regard to the autonomous region of the Åland islands, to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, the Republic of Finland has failed, with regard to the autonomous region of the Åland islands, to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 03.06.2006.

1

---
#### § 83.37 What procedure follows the end of the comment period on a negative proposed finding?

If OFA has received comments on the negative proposed finding, then the petitioner will have 60 days to submit a written response, with citations to and explanations of supporting evidence, and the supporting evidence cited and explained in the response. The Department will not consider additional comments or evidence on the proposed finding submitted by individuals or entities during this response period.
#### § 39.218 Are there different formulas for different levels of residential services?

(a) Residential services are funded as shown in the following table:

| If a residential program operates . . . | Each student is funded at the level of . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) 4 nights per week or less | Total WSU × 4/7. |
| (2) 5, 6 or 7 nights per week | Total WSU × 7/7. |

(b) In order to qualify for residential services funding under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, a school must document that at least 10 percent of residents are present on 3 of the 4 weekends during the count period.

(c) At least 50 percent of the residency levels established during the count period must be maintained every month for the remainder of the school year.

(d) A school may obtain waivers from the requirements of this section if there are health or safety justifications.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
**MEMORY PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     Each of the undersigned officers of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. (the“Company”) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Tony ScullionTONY SCULLIONChief Executive Officer and DirectorAugust 16, 2004 /s/ Dennis M. KeaneDENNIS M. KEANEChief Financial OfficerAugust 16, 2004
*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp.and will be retained by Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This writtenstatement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated byreference into any filing of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32(b)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Overnite Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick D. Hanley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



|    |  |                                                  
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ PATRICK D. HANLEY                            
|    |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



August 10, 2004
Amendment No. 1 to Director Stock Option Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.21 
 MOUNTAIN 1ST BANK & TRUST COMPANY 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN (the “Amendment”) is made as of this 16th day of May, 2005, by Mountain 1st Bank & Trust Company (the “Bank”). 
 WHEREAS, on June 28, 2004, the Bank’s Board of Directors adopted, subject to approval by the Bank’s shareholders and by the North
Carolina Commissioner of Banks (the “Commissioner”) in the manner required by North Carolina law, the Bank’s Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Plan”) which provides for the grant of options to directors of the Bank
to purchase newly issued shares of the Bank’s common stock; and, 
 WHEREAS, under North Carolina law applicable to banks, the
Director Plan may provide for the issuance of an aggregate number of shares upon the exercise of options granted thereunder equal to not more than 10% of the Bank’s total outstanding shares, and Sections 1.2 and 6.1 of the Director Plan, as
originally adopted, provide for the issuance of up to an aggregate of 203,125 shares of common stock (as adjusted in accordance with its terms for the five-for-four split in the Bank’s common stock effected during February 2005); and,

 WHEREAS, by resolutions effective May 16, 2005, and as a result of increases in the number of outstanding shares of the
Bank’s common stock since the Director Plan was first adopted, the Bank’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Director Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares that may be issued under the Plan during its life to 318,150
shares, and the Board of Directors authorized the submission of the Director Plan, as so amended for approval by the Bank’s shareholders and by the Commissioner; and, 
 WHEREAS, this Amendment No. 1 is made for the purpose of effecting the amendment to the Director Plan. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and pursuant to authority duly given by the Bank’s Board of Directors, Section 1.2 of
the Director Plan hereby is amended to increase the aggregate number of shares that may be issued during the life of the Director Plan upon the exercise of options granted thereunder to 318,150 shares. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank has executed this Amendment, by and through the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, on this the day and year first
above written. 
  

							
		 		 	MOUNTAIN 1ST BANK & TRUST COMPANY
	(SEAL)	 		 		 	
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Gregory L. Gibson

		 		 		 	Gregory L. Gibson
		 		 		 	Chief Executive Officer
	 ATTEST:
	 		 		 	
				
	 /s/ Sherrie B. Rogers
	 		 		 	
	Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED  DECEMBER
31, 1999, AND THE NOTES THERETO,  WHICH MAY BE FOUND ON PAGES 2 THROUGH 7 OF THE
COMPANY'S  FORM  10-QSB,  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,561
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,249
<PP&E>                                         11,709
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          162,798
<BONDS>                                        100,233
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,672,475
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,563,946)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   371,560
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               153,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (153,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (153,831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (153,831)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED
                                  STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Penton Media, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, that the Company's
quarterly report for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") that to his
knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


Dated: August 15, 2005                  /s/ David B. Nussbaum
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        David B. Nussbaum
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Preston L. Vice
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Preston L. Vice
                                        Chief Financial Officer
§ 720.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations. ( a ) Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that any dwelling that is constructed for a relocatee household is designed and constructed so as to be readily accessible to and usable by any handicapped person who is a member of that household.
[51 FR 22891, 22896, June 23, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 22892, June 23, 1986]
TS-EMLA10/20/30 

Attachment #5

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 2 

Worker/Occupational Exposure Information on the New Chemical Substance at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-73 

July 14, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043(b)(8) Reportable Events. Mergers, Consolidations & other Transfers of Plan Assets 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of June 11, 1975, concerning the proposed merger of the * * * 

As I understand the pertinent facts, the * * * Corporation proposes to merge into itself * * * * * * its wholly-owned

subsidiary and, upon the effectiveness of this merger, merge the * * * Plan into the * * * * * * All assets and obligations

of the * * * Plan will be transferred to the * * * Plan and all participants in the * * * Plan will become participants in the

* * * Plan. You indicated that the merger of the * * * Plan into the Plan will be in compliance with Section 208 of the

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). Because the trustee of the * * * Plan indicated that it

will not transfer the * * * Plan's assets to the trustee of the * * * Plan until this Corporation has approved the merger and

transfer, you asked for confirmation of your opinion that such PBGC approval is not required under the Act. 

PBGC approval is not required before the proposed merger and transfer may be effected. As you noted, however,

the facts you described do constitute a "reportable event" [*2] as decribed in Section 4043(b)(8) of the Act and must

be reported to this Corporation as required by Section 4043(a) of the Act. This notice of a reportable event should be

sent to * * * * * * and should contain the following information: 

(1) Copy of * * * Plan and trust agreement with amendments; 

(2) Copy of * * * Plan and trust agreement with amendment; 

(3) * * * Plan balance sheet; and 

(4) * * * Plan balance sheet. 

 If you have any questions concerning the reportable events filing procedures, you should contact * * * at * * * 

If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50781

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONCIO ARANGO-GONZALEZ, also known as Leonicio

Arango-Gonzalez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-44

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Leoncio ArangoGonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Minnesota�s forests.**
 
2003: Part APart B | 2008 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.80:F 76/M 66/
Item Number:0083-B-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000869480
 
March 7, 2018