alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1722. Benefits and burdens incident to administration of functions and operations under sections 1720 and 1721

All of the benefits and burdens incident to the administration of the functions and operations of the Association under sections 1720 and 1721, respectively, of this title, after allowance for related obligations of the Association, its prorated expenses, and the like, including amounts required for the establishment of such reserves as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall deem appropriate, shall inure solely to the Secretary of the Treasury, and such related earnings or other amounts as become available shall be paid annually by the Association to the Secretary of the Treasury for covering into miscellaneous receipts.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title III, §307, as added Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title II, §201, 68 Stat. 619; amended Pub. L. 90–448, title VIII, §802(v), (w), Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 539.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1720 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §483(a)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1240.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 307 of act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title III, 48 Stat. 1255; amended Feb. 3, 1938, ch. 13, §8, 52 Stat. 24, related to exemption from taxation, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by act July 1, 1948, ch. 784, §1, 62 Stat. 1206, and was subsequently covered by section 1719 of this title until the general amendment of this subchapter by act Aug. 2, 1954. See section 1723a(c) of this title.

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–448 repealed subsecs. (a) and (b) which related to separate accountability and to functions of the Association under sections 1720 and 1721 of this title, redesignated subsec. (c) as the entire section, and substituted "Secretary of Housing and Urban Development" for "board of directors of the Association".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by title VIII of Pub. L. 90–448, see section 808 of Pub. L. 90–448, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1716b of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION (1)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted), Kevin P. Corcoran, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company"), and Kathy A. San Roman, Vice President,
Human Resources & Administration and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his and her knowledge:

1.    The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December
      31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
      "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations
      of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of June 30,
2004.

                           /s/  Kevin P. Corcoran
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                           /s/ Kathy A. San Roman
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Vice President, Human Resources & Administration and
                           Acting Chief Financial Officer

-------------
(1)   This certification "accompanies" the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A to which
      it relates, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, and
      is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
      to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Lynx Therapeutics, Inc.
      under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after
      the date of the Annual Report on Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
      incorporation language contained in such filing.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sudden oak death, a sciencesymposium: the state of our knowledge.**
 
2002 | 2005 | 2008 | 2009 | 2012 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.88/9:
Item Number:0083-B-54 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000700445
 
March 19, 2018
§ 700.145 Payments to estates. ( a ) Relocation benefits can be paid to the estate of a deceased Certified Eligible Head of Household under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) If there is no household requiring relocation pursuant to the Act surviving the deceased head of household: ( i ) Compensation for the habitation and other improvements owned by the deceased head of household and the cost of removing personal property from the acquired habitation and other improvements shall be paid to the estate of a deceased head of household, or as otherwise directed by a court of competent jurisdiction.
( ii ) No replacement housing benefit or assistance payment (bonus) shall be paid under this circumstance.
( 2 ) Replacement housing benefits may be paid to an estate only when a certified eligible head of household was qualified for such a housing payment pursuant to the Act and signed a Relocation Contract but died before the replacement housing was occupied. The estate of a certified eligible head of household who had not signed a Relocation Contract at the time of his/her death is not eligible for payment of a replacement housing benefit.
( b ) If one of a married couple who was a certified eligible head of household dies, the surviving spouse may be paid the same relocation assistance benefits, including replacement housing payments, which the couple would have received had death not occurred. If there is no surviving spouse, a court of competent jurisdiction may appoint a guardian to act for minor members of the household. The Commission shall deal with such guardian and any members of the household who have attained their majority in a manner to effect relocation of the remaining household under these regulations.
[47 FR 17988, Apr. 27, 1982]
#### THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, A Corporation v. MICHAEL B. LACKEY and wife, DEBRA C. LACKEY, and EARL DAVID GREER and wife, BETTY GREER

328PA89

(Filed 5 April 1990)

ON plaintiff’s petition for discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 94 N.C. App. 553, 380 S.E.2d 538 (1989), reversing the entry of summary judgment for plaintiff by *Lamm, J.,*at the 28 March 1988 Session of CALDWELL Superior Court. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 March 1990.

*Faison & Brown, by Mark C. Kirby and John F. Logan, for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Wilson, Palmer and Lackey, P.A., by W. C. Palmer and David S. Lackey, for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*James Smith, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59710;

First District (4th Division)

November 13, 1974.

Paul Bradley and Allen L. Wiederer, both of State Appellate Defenders Office, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., and William F. Linkul, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE BURMAN.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.192 What employees are covered by FTCA for medical-related claims? ( a ) Permanent employees;
( b ) Temporary employees;
( c ) Persons providing services without compensation in carrying out a contract;
( d ) Persons required because of their employment by a self-determination contractor to serve non-IHS beneficiaries (even if the services are provided in facilities not owned by the contractor); and
( e ) Federal employees assigned to the contract.
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-10136

Summary Calendar

JOHNNIE SUE CAWLEY, Independent Executrix

of the Estate of George Berryman, Jr.

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

MONY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:93-CV-2462)

June 27, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

This diversity case decided on cross motions for summary

judgment presents the issue whether, under Texas law, the

incontestability clause of a life insuranc e policy precludes the

issuing insurer from contesting that the policy was void ab initio.

The district court held that it did and we affirm.

The facts are uncontested. Dr. Berryman, the insured,

obtained from Appellant a term life policy on his own life. He2

subsequently made another person the owner of the policy.

Thereafter, he applied to convert it to a universal life policy.

The Appellant did so. The universal life policy contains an

incontestability clause. Both parties agree that when he requested

the change from term life to universal life, Dr. Berryman lacked

the legal authority to do so because he was no longer the owner of

the policy. Appellant argued to the district court, and does so

here, that because the universal life policy was void ab initio,

the incontestability clause has no effect; the policy was never “in

force”. The clause reads:

This policy will be incontestable after it has

been in force during the lif etime of the

Insured for 2 years from its date of issue,

except as to any provision for benefits in

case of total disabilit y. But, any material

statements made in an application for an

optional increase in Specified Amount or in

any application for reinstatement will be

incontestable only after the increase or

reinstatement has been in force during the

lifetime of the Insured for 2 years from the

date it took effect.

The district court concluded, correctly we think, that the law

of Texas precluded Appellant’s argument. In so holding the court

relied primarily upon Central States Life Ins. Co. v. Byrnes , 375

S.W.2d 330 (Tex. Civ. App., 1964 ) N.R.E.; Kansas Life Ins. Co. v.

Truscott

, 124 Tex. 409, 78 S.W.2d 584 (1935); and Trevino v.

American Nat. Ins. Co

., 168 S.W. 2d 656 ( Tex Com. App. 1943).

While these cases do not involve the precise fact s and issue of3

this case, we agree with the district court that these cases

correctly state the law of Texas on the s ubject. Their rational

and result appear consistant with the rule in the majority of

jurisdictions. S ee

, Keaten v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co.

, 648 F.2d

299 (5th Cir. 1981). The district court correctly applied that law

to the facts of this case.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 87 (Tuesday, May 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 25896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10327]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities; Arts and 
Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities; National Foundation on 
the Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given that the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities 
will hold a meeting of the Arts and Artifacts International Indemnity 
Panel. The purpose of the meeting is for panel review, discussion, 
evaluation, and recommendation on applications for Certificates of 
Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts and the 
Humanities, for exhibitions beginning on or after July 1, 2014.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 28, 2014, from 9:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Constitution Center, 400 7th 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20506, in Room 3068.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management 
Officer, 400 7th Street SW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20506, or call 
(202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the National 
Endowment for the Humanities' TDD terminal at (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because the meeting will consider 
proprietary financial and commercial data provided in confidence by 
indemnity applicants, and material that is likely to disclose trade 
secrets or other privileged or confidential information, and because it 
is important to keep the values of objects to be indemnified, and the 
methods of transportation and security measures confidential, the 
meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to section 552b(c)(4) of 
Title 5, U.S.S.C. I have made this determination under the authority 
granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory 
Committee Meetings, dated July 19, 1993.

    Dated: April 29, 2014.
Lisette Voyatzis,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-10327 Filed 5-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
§ 17.215 Membership practices of certain organizations. ( a ) *Social fraternities and sororities.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of social fraternities and sororities that are exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. 501(a), the active membership of which consists primarily of students in attendance at institutions of higher education.
( b ) *YMCA, YWCA, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), the Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA), the Girl Scouts, the Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.
( c ) *Voluntary youth service organizations.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of a voluntary youth service organization that is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(a)), and the membership of which has been traditionally limited to members of one sex and principally to persons of less than nineteen years of age.
Parrag
- uirre J.

(VtA Cherry

2 assuming that laches does not preclude consideration of appellant's motion on the merits, see Hart v. State, 116 Nev. 558, 563-65, 1 P.3d 969, 972 (2000) ("[C]onsideration of the equitable doctrine of laches is necessary in determining whether a defendant has shown 'manifest injustice' that would permit withdrawal of a plea after sentencing."), we conclude that he is not entitled to relief because his conviction became final prior to Padilla and he cannot benefit from its holding as Padilla does not apply retroactively. Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. „ 133 S. Ct. 1103, 1113 (2013). Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not err by denying appellant's motion, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.



# /

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District C
-Ourt Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge Don P. Chairez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated May 6, 2013, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated May 7, 2013, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2013-2US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Karleen Munns, am a Director of Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited (the Servicer).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the period from April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been
made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: 17 June 2016           
|                             
|/s/ Karleen Munns            
|Karleen Munns Director       
|                             
|Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION (1)**
     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(18 U.S.C. §1350), John West, Chief Executive Officer of Solexa, Inc. (the “Company”), and Kathy A.San Roman, Vice President, Human Resources & Administration and Acting Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:
**1.**  The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
**2.**  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
**In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of March 31, 2005.                                                                /s/  John West   John West   Chief Executive Officer                                                              /s/  Kathy A. San Roman   Kathy A. San Roman   Vice President, Human Resources &Administration andActing Chief Financial Officer   
(1)  This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of Solexa, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
### §201. Short title

This subchapter may be cited as the "Bank Conservation Act."

(Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, title II, §201, 48 Stat. 2.)
### [§691. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title IV, §402(a)(1), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2551]

Section, added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title IV, §401(b)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 285; amended Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title IV, §402, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2503; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title IV, §402, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1719; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title IV, §402(a), (b), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 1995, 1996; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title IV, §402(a), title X, §1066(b)(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 585, 772; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IV, §§402(a), 403], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–92; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title IV, §402, Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1069; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title IV, §402, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2524; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IV, §402, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1450; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title IV, §402, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1862; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title IV, §402, Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3219; Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title IV, §402, Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2169; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IV, §402, Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 86; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title IV, §402, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4428; Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title IV, §402, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2265; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title IV, §402, Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4202; Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title IV, §402, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1382; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title IV, §402, Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1708; Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title IV, §402(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 744; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title IV, §402, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3349; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title IV, §402, Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title IV, §402, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2091; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title IV, §402, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1368; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title IV, §402, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1735; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IV, §402, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1334; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IV, §402(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3555; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title IV, §402, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1673, related to permanent end strength levels to support the National Defense Strategy.
# C_2007069EN.01000101.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/1

---

(2007/C 69/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 56, 10.3.2007

OJ C 56, 10.3.2007

Past publications

OJ C 42, 24.2.2007

OJ C 20, 27.1.2007

OJ C 331, 30.12.2006

OJ C 326, 30.12.2006

OJ C 310, 16.12.2006

OJ C 294, 2.12.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### § 89.31 Negotiation of contract.

That person or governing entity recognized as having authority to act for and in behalf of any one of the Five Civilized Tribes in matters of importance may, when it is found there is a substantial need and demand therefor, negotiate and contract for services of a tribal counsel or counsels and technical specialist or specialists, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior or his authorized representative.

[37 FR 10440, May 23, 1972. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]