11198 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices 

2 If the review request involves a non-market 

economy and the parties subject to the review 

request do not qualify for separate rates, all other 

exporters of subject merchandise from the nonmarket economy country who do not have a 

separate rate will be covered by the review as part 

of the single entity of which the named firms are 

a part. 

interested party or an interested party 

described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 

must state why it desires the Secretary 

to review those particular producers or 

exporters.2 If the interested party 

intends for the Secretary to review sales 

of merchandise by an exporter (or a 

producer if that producer also exports 

merchandise from other suppliers) 

which were produced in more than one 

country of origin and each country of 

origin is subject to a separate order, then 

the interested party must state 

specifically, on an order-by-order basis, 

which exporter(s) the request is 

intended to cover. 

Please note that, for any party the 

Department was unable to locate in 

prior segments, the Department will not 

accept a request for an administrative 

review of that party absent new 

information as to the party’s location. 

Moreover, if the interested party who 

files a request for review is unable to 

locate the producer or exporter for 

which it requested the review, the 

interested party must provide an 

explanation of the attempts it made to 

locate the producer or exporter at the 

same time it files its request for review, 

in order for the Secretary to determine 

if the interested party’s attempts were 

reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department 

has clarified its practice with respect to 

the collection of final antidumping 

duties on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders. See also the Import 

Administration Web site at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov. 

Six copies of the request should be 

submitted to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230. The Department 

also asks parties to serve a copy of their 

requests to the Office of Antidumping/ 

Countervailing Operations, Attention: 

Sheila Forbes, in room 3508 of the main 

Commerce Building. Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii), a copy of each request 

must be served on the petitioner and 

each exporter or producer specified in 

the request. 

The Department will publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation 

of Administrative Review of 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation’’ for requests received by 

the last day of March 2011. If the 

Department does not receive, by the last 

day of March 2011, a request for review 

of entries covered by an order, finding, 

or suspended investigation listed in this 

notice and for the period identified 

above, the Department will instruct CBP 

to assess antidumping or countervailing 

duties on those entries at a rate equal to 

the cash deposit of (or bond for) 

estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the POR. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: February 18, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4530 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct a 

review to determine whether revocation 

of a countervailing or antidumping duty 

order or termination of an investigation 

suspended under section 704 or 734 of 

the Act would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

or a countervailable subsidy (as the case 

may be) and of material injury. 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 

2011 

The following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in April 2011 

and will appear in that month’s Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset 

Reviews. 

Department Contact 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line & Pressure Pipe (Over 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan (A–588–850) (2nd Review) ........ David Goldberger 

(202) 482–4136. 

Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line & Pressure Pipe (Under 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan (A–588–851) (2nd Review) ...... David Goldberger 

(202) 482–4136. 

Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line & Pressure Pipe (Under 41⁄2 Inches) from Romania (A–485–805) (2nd Review) .. Dana Mermelstein 

(202) 482–1391. 

Sulfanilic Acid from the People’s Republic of China (A–570–815) (3rd Review) ...................................................................... Julia Hancock 

(202) 482–1394. 

Sulfanilic Acid from India (A–533–806) (3rd Review) ................................................................................................................ Julia Hancock 

(202) 482–1394. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

Sulfanilic Acid from India (C–533–807) (3rd Review) ................................................................................................................ David Goldberger 

(202) 482–4136. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices 11199 

Department Contact 

Suspended Investigations 

No Sunset Review of suspended investigations are scheduled for initiation in April 2011. 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to the Department’s conduct of 

Sunset Reviews is set forth in the 

Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3— 

Policies Regarding the Conduct of Fiveyear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy 

Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998). 

The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews provides further 

information regarding what is required 

of all parties to participate in Sunset 

Reviews. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Please note that if the Department 

receives a Notice of Intent to Participate 

from a member of the domestic industry 

within 15 days of the date of initiation, 

the review will continue. Thereafter, 

any interested party wishing to 

participate in the Sunset Review must 

provide substantive comments in 

response to the notice of initiation no 

later than 30 days after the date of 

initiation. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: February 16, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4523 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Public Law 

106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), 

we invite comments on the question of 

whether instruments of equivalent 

scientific value, for the purposes for 

which the instruments shown below are 

intended to be used, are being 

manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be postmarked on or before March 21, 

2011. Address written comments to 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 

3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230. Applications 

may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 

5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce in Room 3720. 

Docket Number: 10–045. Applicant: 

Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific 

Northwest Division, Pacific Northwest 

National Laboratory, 3335 Q Ave., 

Richland, WA 99354. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, the Netherlands. Intended 

Use: This instrument will be used as an 

analytical tool for doing serial 

sectioning and producing 3D analytical 

analysis for both geological and material 

science samples. Justification for DutyFree Entry: There are no instruments of 

the same general category manufactured 

in the United States. Application 

accepted by Commissioner of Customs: 

February 2, 2011. 

Docket Number: 10–072. Applicant: 

University of Puerto Rico, Institute of 

Neurobiology, PO Box 365067, San 

Juan, Puerto Rico 00936–5067. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. 

Intended Use: The instrument will be 

used to reconstruct the remodeling 

synapses in the regenerating tectum, 

quantify the numbers and types of 

synapses, and quantify the effect that 

changes in brain-derived neurotrophic 

factors have on these synapses made by 

regenerated axons in the brain. The 

instrument will also enable the 

unequivocal identification of synapses 

made by Engrailed-expressing neurons, 

something that is impossible to do any 

other way. Additionally, the instrument 

will be used to study the location of 

aminergic receptors and transporter 

molecules in specific areas of the central 

nervous systems of freshwater prawns. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There 

are no instruments of the same general 

category manufactured in the United 

States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: December 

22, 2010. 

Docket Number: 10–076. Applicant: 

Regents of the University of Minnesota, 

12 Shepherd Labs 100 Union St, SE., 

Minneapolis, MN 55455. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Inc., Czech Republic. Intended Use: The 

instrument will support structural study 

of the mechanisms of virus assembly 

and infection, kidney structure and 

function in disease, bacterial infection 

and host response, and other 

applications. Justification for Duty-Free 

Entry: There are no instruments of the 

same general category manufactured in 

the United States. Application accepted 

by Commissioner of Customs: December 

29, 2010. 

Docket Number: 11–002. Applicant: 

Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell 

University, 1300 York Avenue, New 

York, NY 10065. Instrument: Electron 

Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., 

Japan. Intended Use: The instrument 

will allow users to acquire well focused, 

high contrast, high quality images 

through the full range of magnifications, 

from 50x to 1,200,000x. Justification for 

Duty-Free Entry: There are no 

instruments of the same general 

category manufactured in the United 

States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: January 11, 

2011. 

Docket Number: 11–003. Applicant: 

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 

Department of Veterinary Pathology, 

Bldg. 54, Room G111, 6825 16th St., 

NW., Washington, DC 20306–6000. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. 

Intended Use: The instrument will be 

used to examine tissue specimens to 

identify and characterize pathologic 

tissue changes, determine disease 

diagnosis and severity, and aid in 

prognosis and treatment of patients as 

applicable. The required capabilities 

that this instrument provides are a 

voltage range between 40kV and 120 kV, 

a resolution of 0.2nm line and 0.38nm 

point, and a magnification of x50 to 

600,000, among other requirements. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There 

are no instruments of the same general 

category manufactured in the United 

States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: January 11, 

2011. 

Docket Number: 11–004. Applicant: 

San Diego State University, 5500 

Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Inc., Czech Republic. 

Intended Use: The instrument will be 

used for many applications including 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES