alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

** **

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement  dated as of May 1,2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, adivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. BankNational Association, as Trustee and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2012- CCRE1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 Pursuant toSection 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 1. A review of the activities of theMaster Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31,2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement duringsuch period has been made under my supervision, and

 2. To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.

  

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
(logo)****CURCIO

+COHEN

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’sReport on Assessment of 2016 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), thatPark Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December31, 2016, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within ExhibitB to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report areonly those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trustadvisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the“Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. ReferenceExhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by thisexamination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selectedsample of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whetherthe Company performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures werelimited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report. Our examination was notdesigned to detect material noncompliance arising from errors that may haveoccurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected theCompany’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report.We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report withrespect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’sReport as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, for the Platform, isfairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen,CPA’s, P.C.

 

 

New York, NY

February 2, 2017

 

 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSPC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL: 212 557-9800  FAX:212 557 9819   WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
# C_2006301EN.01000101.xml

| 12.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 December 2006

(2006/C 301/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3177 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4551 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6762 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0585 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5916 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,14 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,122 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5781 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,898 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6979 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8123 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4338 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,68 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 35,137 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,887 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6835 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5135 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2423 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9176 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0341 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 219,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3329 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3242 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3415 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 974,6 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6871 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,341 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,672 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,882 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3177

JPY

Japanese yen

154,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4551

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6762

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0585

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5916

ISK

Iceland króna

92,14

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,122

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5781

CZK

Czech koruna

27,898

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6979

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8123

RON

Romanian leu

3,4338

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,68

SKK

Slovak koruna

35,137

TRY

Turkish lira

1,887

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6835

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5135

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2423

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9176

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0341

KRW

South Korean won

1 219,99

ZAR

South African rand

9,3329

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3242

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3415

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 974,6

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6871

PHP

Philippine peso

65,341

RUB

Russian rouble

34,672

THB

Thai baht

46,882

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### §1715. Statistical and economic surveys

The Secretary shall cause to be made in connection with the insurance programs such statistical surveys and legal and economic studies as he shall deem useful to guide the development of housing and the creation of a sound mortgage market in the United States, and shall publish from time to time the results of such surveys and studies. Expenses of such studies and surveys, and expenses of publication and distribution of the results of such studies and surveys, shall be charged as a general expense of such insurance fund or funds, as the Secretary shall determine.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title II, §209, 48 Stat. 1252; Feb. 3, 1938, ch. 13, §3, 52 Stat. 22; Mar. 28, 1941, ch. 31, §4(c), 55 Stat. 62; Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title I, §122, 64 Stat. 59; Pub. L. 87–70, title VI, §612(d), June 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 181; Pub. L. 89–117, title XI, §1108(f), Aug. 10, 1965, 79 Stat. 504; Pub. L. 90–19, §1(a)(3), (f), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 17, 18.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1967—Pub. L. 90–19 substituted "Secretary" for "Commissioner" wherever appearing and inserted "in connection with the insurance programs" after "made".

1965—Pub. L. 89–117 struck out "or account or accounts," after "fund or funds,".

1961—Pub. L. 87–70 substituted "shall be charged as a general expense of such insurance fund or funds, or account or accounts, as the Commissioner shall determine" for "shall be charged as a general expense of the Fund, the Housing Fund, and the Defense Housing Insurance Fund in such proportion as the Commissioner shall determine".

1950—Act Apr. 20, 1950, substituted "Commissioner" for "Administrator" wherever appearing.

1941—Act Mar. 28, 1941, substituted "Fund, the Housing Fund, and the Defense Housing Insurance Fund" for "Fund and the Housing Fund".

1938—Act Feb. 3, 1938, inserted "and the Housing Fund in such proportion as the Administrator shall determine" after "Fund".
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Benefits 
-  Qualified Domestic Relations Orders and PBGC 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Qualified Domestic Relations Orders and PBGC

When a couple divorces or separates, or one member seeks child or spousal support from the other, a court or state agency may divide a person's pension benefit or order payments from it by issuing a domestic relations order (DRO). When the DRO relates to a pension plan trusteed by PBGC, PBGC must review it to make sure it is in line with ERISA, the federal pension law, as well as PBGC policies. If it is, PBGC *qualifies*the DRO, and it becomes a qualified domestic relations order, or QDRO A domestic relations order that meets certain requirements, as determined by the plan or PBGC. This “qualification” gives an alternate payee the right to receive some or all of the benefits payable under a plan.. PBGC will pay benefits as the directs.

*Qualified Domestic Relations Orders & PBGC* contains the information you or your attorney need to prepare a QDRO A domestic relations order that meets certain requirements, as determined by the plan or PBGC. This “qualification” gives an alternate payee the right to receive some or all of the benefits payable under a plan. - including:

## Models, Procedures and Checklist

                          - PBGC Model Separate Interest QDRO
                          - PBGC Model Shared Payment QDRO
                          - PBGC Model Child Support Shared Payment QDRO
                          - PBGC Model Treat-As-Spouse QDRO
                          - PBGC Model QDRO Instructions
                          - QDRO Procedures and Checklist
                          - Appendices on:                             - Defined Benefit Pension Plans and PBGC Benefit Rules — Appendix A 
                            - Domestic Relations Orders Qualified Before PBGC Becomes Trustee — Appendix B
                            - QDRO Tax Rules — Appendix C  
                            - Language for Including a Contingent Alternate Payee — Appendix F   
                            - How to Obtain Certain Participant Information from PBGC — Appendix G 

Tooltip text

February 11, 2022

##           Contact Us      

Visit our Contact Us page for more information.

##           Related Resources      

Qualified Domestic Relations Orders & PBGC (PDF)
# CA2006181EN.01002501.xml

| 3.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 181/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 181/25

---

RESERVE LISTS

   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

(1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/6/05

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/6/05

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS (HEADS OF UNIT — A*9)

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS (HEADS OF UNIT — A*9)

IN THE FIELD OF TRANSLATION

IN THE FIELD OF TRANSLATION

(2006/C 181 A/05)

having as their main language:

having as their main language:

CZECH (CS)

| CHAB | Jakub |
| --- | --- |
| DRABEK | Vladimir |
| PACHOLIK | Otto |
| PLACEK | Jiri |

CHAB

Jakub

DRABEK

Vladimir

PACHOLIK

Otto

PLACEK

Jiri

ESTONIAN (ET)

| ANUPOLD (KRUUSMAA) | Leila |
| --- | --- |
| MUELLER | Dirk |
| PALK | Paavo |
| VIHTERPAL (MOOR) | Epp |

ANUPOLD (KRUUSMAA)

Leila

MUELLER

Dirk

PALK

Paavo

VIHTERPAL (MOOR)

Epp

HUNGARIAN (HU)

| BAJTAY | Peter |
| --- | --- |
| BOKOR | Peter |
| EGYEDI | Andras |
| GONDA | Miklos |
| KASZAP | Balazs |

BAJTAY

Peter

BOKOR

Peter

EGYEDI

Andras

GONDA

Miklos

KASZAP

Balazs

LITHUANIAN (LT)

| SPOKIENE (SADAUSKAITE) | Vitalija |
| --- | --- |

SPOKIENE (SADAUSKAITE)

Vitalija

LATVIAN (LV)

| PRIEDE | Uldis |
| --- | --- |
| SMITE (BINDARE) | Inta |

PRIEDE

Uldis

SMITE (BINDARE)

Inta

MALTESE (MT)

| ATTARD | Carmel |
| --- | --- |
| CARUANA | Joseph |
| ZAHRA | Helga |

ATTARD

Carmel

CARUANA

Joseph

ZAHRA

Helga

POLISH (PL)

| HANKUS | Damian |
| --- | --- |
| KLOPOTOWSKA (LENKIEWICZ) | Agata |
| KWASNIEWICZ | Krzysztof |
| KWIECINSKI | Piotr |
| MALINOWSKA | Ewa |
| OSTOJA-OSTASZEWSKI | Jan |
| STRYJECKI | Marcin |
| SZPAKOWSKI | Miroslaw |
| SZUBA | Pawel |

HANKUS

Damian

KLOPOTOWSKA (LENKIEWICZ)

Agata

KWASNIEWICZ

Krzysztof

KWIECINSKI

Piotr

MALINOWSKA

Ewa

OSTOJA-OSTASZEWSKI

Jan

STRYJECKI

Marcin

SZPAKOWSKI

Miroslaw

SZUBA

Pawel

SLOVAKIAN (SK)

| BENOVA | Eva |
| --- | --- |
| KLUVANEC | Daniel |
| KONRAD | Robert |
| KORMUTH | Peter |
| MISANIKOVA (CHUDIKOVA) | Karin |
| PIKNA | Miroslav |

BENOVA

Eva

KLUVANEC

Daniel

KONRAD

Robert

KORMUTH

Peter

MISANIKOVA (CHUDIKOVA)

Karin

PIKNA

Miroslav

SLOVENIAN (SL)

| KOBE | Andrej |
| --- | --- |

KOBE

Andrej

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2007 and may be extended.

31 December 2007

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-39 

December 20, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4201 Withdrawal Liability Established

4202 Determination & Collection of Liability

4219 Notice & Collection of Withdrawal Liability

4221 Resolution of Disputes 

OPINION: 

 This responds to your letter to Congressman concerning withdrawal liability under the Multiemployer Pension Plan

Amendments Act of 1980 ("M ultiemployer Act") which amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

("ERISA"). The Congressman has requested that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC" ) assist you. The

purpose of this letter is to explain your rights when withdrawal liability is assessed by a pension plan. 

In your letter you state that on * * *, Your Board of directors decided to terminate your corporation, Inc. Liquidation

commenced in * * * and formal dissolution occurred in * * * A notice to creditors was published and six months later

on * * *, no claims having been received, the corporation ceased to exist pursuant to law. 

You further state that prior to dissolution, the corporation contributed on behalf of its employees to the * * * Pension

Plan. In * * * as a consequence of the corporate dissolution, the pension plan assessed the former shareholders

approximately $60,000 (later increased [*2] to $80,000) in withdrawal liability pursuant to the Multiemployer Act. 

The Multiemployer Act provides that an employer that withdraws (ceases making contributions) from a

multiemployer pension plan may be liable for a share of the plan's unfunded vested benefits. Section 4201 of ERISA,

29 U.S.C. § 1381. The plan sponsor (ordinarily the trustees) of the pension fund are required by law to assess liability

against a withdrawn employer. Section 4202 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1382. 

 If an employer disputes the liability determination of the plan, it may petition the plan for review. Section

4219(a)(2) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1399(a)(2). If the dispute continues, arbitration is required. Section 4221 of ERISA,

29 U.S.C. § 1401. Finally, the arbitrator's decision is reviewable by the federal courts. Section 4221(b)(2) of ERISA,

29 U.S.C. § 1401(b)(2). During this process the employer may raise defenses such as the amount or even the existence

of liability. 

Your final question concerns whether there are any legislative efforts toward eliminating withdrawal liability as

applied to withdrawals which occurred prior to the enactment date of the Multiemployer Act. One such effort is H.R.

[*3] 7233, the "Multiemployer Retirement Income Protection Act of 1982." 

For further assistance on this matter please contact * * * of my office at the above address or (202) 254-4873. 

I hope we have been of assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 517.8 Appeals. ( a ) *Right of appeal.* The requester has the right to appeal to the FOIA Appeals Officer any adverse determination.
( b ) *Notice of Appeal* — ( 1 ) *Time for appeal.* To be considered timely, an appeal must be postmarked, or in the case of electronic submissions, transmitted, no later than ninety (90) calendar days after the date of the response or after the time limit for response by the FOIA Officer has expired. Prior to submitting an appeal any outstanding fees associated with FOIA requests must be paid in full.
( 2 ) *Form of appeal.* An appeal shall be initiated by filing a written notice of appeal. The notice shall be accompanied by copies of the original request and adverse determination. To expedite the appellate process and give the requester an opportunity to present his/her arguments, the notice should contain a brief statement of the reasons why the requester believes the adverse determination to have been in error. Requesters may submit appeals by mail, facsimile, or electronically. Appeals sent by mail shall be addressed to the National Indian Gaming Commission, Attn: FOIA Appeals Officer, 1849 C Street NW, Mailstop #1621, Washington, DC 20240. Appeals may also be submitted via electronic mail at *FOIARequests@nigc.gov* or through the NIGC's website. To facilitate handling, the requester should mark both the appeal letter and envelope, or subject line of the electronic transmission “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.”
( c ) *Final agency determinations.* The FOIA Appeals Officer shall issue a final written determination, stating the basis for its decision, within twenty (20) working days after receipt of a notice of appeal. If the determination is to provide access to the requested records, the FOIA Officer shall make those records immediately available to the requester. If the determination upholds the adverse determination, the FOIA Appeals Officer shall notify the requester of the determination, the ability to obtain mediation services offered by the Office of Government Information Services as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation, and the right to obtain judicial review in the appropriate Federal district court.
( d ) *When appeal is required.* Before seeking review by a court of the FOIA Officer's adverse determination, a requester generally must first submit a timely administrative appeal.
§ 700.293 Petitions for amendment: Appeals. ( a ) *Right of appeal.* Where a petitioned-for amendment has been rejected, in whole or part, the individual submitting the petition may appeal the denial to the Executive Director.
( b ) *Time for appeal.* ( 1 ) An appeal must be received no later than twenty (20) days (Saturdays, Sundays and public legal holidays excepted) after the date of the decision on a petition.
( 2 ) The Executive Director may, for good cause shown, extend the time for submission of an appeal if a written request for additional time is received within twenty (20) days (Saturdays, Sundays and public legal holidays excepted) of the date of the decision on a petition.
( c ) *Form of appeal.* ( 1 ) An appeal shall be in writing and shall attach copies of the initial petition and the decision on that petition.
( 2 ) The appeal shall contain a brief statement of the reasons why the appellant believes the decision on the petition to have been in error.
( 3 ) The appeal shall be addressed to Privacy Act Officer, Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Commission, Box KK, Flagstaff, Arizona 86002.
#### § 543.1 What does this part cover?

This part establishes the minimum internal control standards for the conduct of Class II games on Indian lands as defined in 25 U.S.C. 2701 *et seq.*
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Joel Glazer, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Manchester United plc;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and  b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: 24 October 2013  By:
/s/ Joel   GlazerJoel GlazerExecutive   Co-Chairman(Principal Executive   Officer)
#### JUDA v. N. C. NATIONAL BANK

No. 175P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 666

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.