alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Simpson, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 302]

Mercure, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Greene County (Lalor, J.), rendered October 22, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of assault in the first degree, attempted assault in the second degree and assault in the second degree.

*935In August 2003, defendant was charged in an indictment with attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree after allegedly stabbing the victim multiple times, puncturing his heart and spleen. Subsequently, in July 2004, he was charged with attempted assault in the second degree and, in September 2004, with two counts of assault in the second degree. These latter charges arose out of incidents that occurred while defendant was in the Greene County jail. In October 2004, defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and attempted assault in the second degree in satisfaction of all charges. During the plea proceeding, defendant agreed to waive his right to appeal. County Court sentenced him, pursuant to the plea agreement, to an aggregate term of 10 years in prison and defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant’s knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal encompasses his claim that his statutory speedy trial right was violated because the People’s notice of readiness for trial was premature *(see People v Cain,*24 AD3d 889, 890 [2005], *lv denied*7 NY3d 753 [2006]; *People v Hernandez,*21 AD3d 1214, 1215 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 883 [2005]). To the extent that he can be said to argue in addition that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial as a result of the 11-month delay in proceeding to trial, his argument survives his guilty plea and waiver of the right to appeal *(see People v Cain, supra*at 890; *People v Hernandez, supra*at 1215). Nonetheless, applying the factors set forth in *People v Taranovich*(37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]), we conclude that his argument is meritless. Any delay in the trial was due to proceedings initiated by the defense or ongoing plea negotiations and there is no evidence that the defense was impaired by the delay *(see People v Guishard,*15 AD3d 731, 732 [2005], *lv denied 5*NY3d 789 [2005]; *People v Acevedo,*176 AD2d 1007,1008 [1991], *lv denied*79 NY2d 824 [1991]).

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Phenoxy Butyl Acrylate Preparation Note Phenoxy butyl bromide CAS 1200-03-9 PMN P-13-0781 
Phenoxy Butyl Acrylate Mass Balance and Preparation
• Add sodium acrylate, TBAB, phenoxybutyl bromide, MEHQ and MEK into a 

10L glass reactor

• Connect stir, condenser, heater and pressure gauge

• Start stir (410rpm)

• Start heating (set 90C)

• The reaction mixture was refluxed for 10hrs

• Cool the temperature down to 45C

• Add hexane into the reactor

• Stir the mixture for 10min

• Discharge the reaction mixture from the reactor

• Filtration through a 10micron filter bag

• Collect the filtrate

• Wash the filtrate with water

• Vacuum strip to remove the volatiles (MEK & Hexane)
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

Map 1-2

Data Source:

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: U.S. Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\RMP_EIS\Chapter_1\Juris.pdf

Location in Arizona

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Surface Management

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Legend

Surface Management

American Indian Reservation

Military Reservations

State Trust Lands

State, County, City; Wildlife, Park and Outdoor Recreation

Areas

Private

Bureau of Land Management

Pima County

National Park Service

Bureau of Reclamation
Exhibit
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO



18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS
ADDED BY



SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Notis Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ned L. Siegel, Executive Chairman of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | To
    my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|Date:
    January 10, 2019 | By: | /s/
    Ned L. Siegel                                                           
|-------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |     | Ned
    L. Siegel                                                               
|                           |     | Title:
    Executive Chairman                                                   
|                           |     | (Principal
    Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 599 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 289
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 599

                          [Report No. 106-909]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2000

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of October 2, 2000, 
providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report to 
accompany the bill (H.R. 4578) making appropriations for the Department 
of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2001, and for other purposes, or any amendment reported 
in disagreement from a conference thereon.
    Sec. 2. House Resolutions 586, 592, and 595 are laid on the table.
                                                 House Calendar No. 289

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 599

                          [Report No. 106-909]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1542

ERIC ALAN SANDERS, on behalf of dependents S.K. Sanders, E.A. Sanders II, 

and Z.M. Gray-Sanders,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate Judge. (0:18-cv-03070-JMC-JPG)

Submitted: August 30, 2019 Decided: October 15, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Alan Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric Alan Sanders seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion 

to recuse. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Sanders seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7350]

# SUMMARY: 

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “Bust of a Ptolemaic Queen,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about March 15, 2011, until on or about March 15, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a description of the exhibit object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: February 22, 2011.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011-4403 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2017

No. 04-17-00358-CR

Cristian YEPEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CRN001641-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due July 31, 2017. Since this time, the 

various court reporters responsible for preparing their respective parts of the reporter’s record 

have received numerous extensions. Some of them have filed their respective reporter’s records. 

However, court reporters David J. Laurel and Blanca Espericueta have failed to file their 

respective reporter’s records. Blanca Espericueta claims that she is “waiting” for David J. 

Laurel. David J. Laurel has a pending notification of late records. We NOTE his notification.

We ORDER David J. Laurel to file the reporter’s record in Appeal No. 04-17-

00358-CR within twenty days of being served a copy of this order. NO EXTENSIONS 

WILL BE GRANTED. If David J. Laurel fails to file the reporter’s record in Appeal No. 04-

17-00358-CR as ordered, David J. Laurel will be ordered to appear and show cause why he 

should not be held in civil or criminal contempt or otherwise sanctioned.

We further ORDER the Clerk of this Court to have David J. Laurel personally served 

with a copy of this order. We also ORDER the person who personally serves David J. Laurel to 

file with this Court written proof of the date and time that David J. Laurel was served with a 

copy of this order.

We ORDER Blanca Espericueta to file the reporter’s record in Appeal No. 04-17-

00358-CR within twenty days of being served a copy of this order. NO EXTENSIONS 

WILL BE GRANTED. If Blanca Espericueta fails to file the reporter’s record in Appeal No. 
04-17-00358-CR as ordered, Blanca Espericueta will be ordered to appear and show cause why 

she should not be held in civil or criminal contempt or otherwise sanctioned.

We further ORDER the Clerk of this Court to have Blanca Espericueta personally 

served with a copy of this order. We also ORDER the person who personally serves Blanca 

Espericueta to file with this Court written proof of the date and time that Blanca Espericueta

was served with a copy of this order.

We further ORDER the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable 

Oscar J. Hale, Jr., by first class United States mail. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and 

appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46800-46801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18931]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9915-12-OA]

Notice of Meeting of the EPA's Children's Health Protection 
Advisory Committee (CHPAC)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of 
the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be 
held September 9 and 10, 2014 at National Archives Museum (700 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20408). The CHPAC was created 
to advise the Environmental Protection Agency on science, regulations, 
and other issues relating to children's environmental health.

DATES: The CHPAC will meet September 9 and 10, 2014.

ADDRESSES: 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20408.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Berger, Office of Children's 
Health Protection, USEPA, MC 1107A, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-2191 or berger.martha@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the 
public. The CHPAC will meet on September 9 from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 
and September 10 from 9:00 a.m. to 1 p.m. The Agenda will include 
discussions regarding the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for 
lead, the National Children's Study, and the EPA research on children's 
health. A complete and final agenda will be posted at epa.gov/children.
    Access and Accommodations: For information on access or services 
for individuals with disabilities, please contact Martha Berger at 202-
564-2191 or berger.martha@epa.gov.

[[Page 46801]]

    Dated: August 3, 2014.
Martha Berger,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2014-18931 Filed 8-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Rider to Customer Agreement


 March 26, 2008 
 Rider to the 
 Customer Documents (Market Counterparty/Non-Private Customer) (Exchange-traded 
 Derivatives Only) (the “Agreement”) 
 Between 
 Demeter Management Corporation on behalf of each Customer listed on Schedule A 
 “Separately and Not Jointly” 
 And
Morgan Stanley & Co. International PLC 
 Dated July 26, 2007 
 Schedule A to the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the Schedule A thereto with the attached Schedule A dated March 26, 2008. 
 Accepted and Agreed: 
 Demeter Management Corporation on behalf of each Customer listed on the attached Schedule A

  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Walter Davis

	Name:	 	Walter Davis
	Title:	 	President
	
	Morgan Stanley & Co. International PLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brian Daly

	Name:	 	Brian Daly
	Title:	 	Managing Director







 Schedule A 
  


			
	 Customer
	  	TaxID
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Altis I, LLC
	  	20-8528951
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Aspect I, LLC
	  	20-8852411
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Blenheim I, LLC
	  	20-8528957
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Chesapeake I, LLC
	  	20-8852501
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Cornerstone I, LLC
	  	20-8852546
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures DKR I, LLC
	  	20-8529012
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Kaiser I, LLC
	  	20-8852620
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Transtrend I, LLC
	  	20-8529012
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Transtrend II, LLC
	  	20-8529352
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures WCM I, LLC
	  	20-8852756
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Campbell I, LLC
	  	26-2246160
# C_2006326EN.01000101.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

The new Members of the Court take the oath

(2006/C 326/01)

Mr Bonichot, Ms Lindh and Mr von Danwitz, appointed Judges at the Court of Justice of the European Communities by decisions of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Communities of 6 April 2006 (1) and 6 July 2006 (2), for the period from 7 October 2006 to 6 October 2012, took the oath before the Court on 6 October 2006.

1

2

Mr Bot, Mr Mazák and Ms Trstenjak, appointed Advocates General of the Court of Justice of the European Communities by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Communities of 6 April 2006 (1), for the period from 7 October 2006 to 6 October 2012, took the oath before the Court on 6 October 2006.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 104, 13.4.2006, p. 39.

1

(2)  OJ L 215, 5.8.2006, p. 30.

2

---
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and for theyear then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errorsthat may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com