alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 513.35 What special review is available when the Commission is the creditor agency? ( a ) ( 1 ) An employee subject to salary offset or a voluntary repayment agreement may, at any time, request a special review by the Commission of the amount of the salary offset or voluntary repayment, based on materially changed circumstances, including, but not limited to, catastrophic illness, divorce, death, or disability.
( 2 ) The request for special review must include an alternative proposed offset or payment schedule and a detailed statement, with supporting documents, that shows why the current salary offset or payment results in extreme financial hardship to the employee, spouse, or dependents. The statement must indicate: ( i ) Income from all sources;
( ii ) Assets;
( iii ) Liabilities;
( iv ) Number of dependents;
( v ) Expenses for food, housing, clothing, and transportation;
( vi ) Medical expenses; and
( vii ) Exceptional expenses, if any.
( b ) The Commission will evaluate the statement and documentation and determine whether the current offset or repayment schedule imposes extreme financial hardship on the employee. The Commission will notify the employee in writing within 30 calendar days of its determination, including, if appropriate, a revised offset or payment schedule. If the special review results in a revised offset or repayment schedule, the Commission will provide a new certification to the paying agency.
### §1959. Administrative procedure

The administrative procedure and judicial review provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5 and chapter 7 of title 5 shall apply to all proceedings under this chapter, section 1829b of this title, and section 1730d 1 of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–508, title I, §129, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1118.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1730d of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 101–73, title IV, §407, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 363.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of seventh calendar month which begins after Oct. 26, 1970, except that the Secretary of the Treasury may, by regulation, provide that this section be effective on any date not earlier than the publication of such regulations in the Federal Register and not later than first day of thirteenth calendar month which begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 401(a), (b) of Pub. L. 91–508, set out as a note under section 1951 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 63.23 What rights does an applicant, volunteer or employee have during this process? ( a ) The applicant, volunteer, or employee must be provided an opportunity to explain, deny, or refute unfavorable and incorrect information gathered in an investigation, before the adjudication is final. The applicant, volunteer, or employee should receive a written summary of all derogatory information and be informed of the process for explaining, denying, or refuting unfavorable information.
( b ) Employers and adjudicating officials must not release the actual background investigative report to an applicant, volunteer, or employee. However, they may issue a written summary of the derogatory information.
( c ) The applicant, volunteer, or employee who is the subject of a background investigation may obtain a copy of the reports from the originating (Federal, state, or other tribal) agency and challenge the accuracy and completeness of any information maintained by that agency.
( d ) The results of an investigation cannot be used for any purpose other than to determine suitability for employment in a position that involves regular contact with or control over Indian children.
( e ) Investigative reports contain information of a highly personal nature and should be maintained confidentially and secured in locked files. Investigative reports should be seen only by those officials who in performing their official duties need to know the information contained in the report.
#### § 168.7 Kind of livestock.

Unless determined otherwise by the Area Director for conservation purposes, the Hopi Tribe may determine, subject to the authorized carrying capacity, the kind of livestock that may be grazed by their tribal members on the range units within the Hopi Partitioned Land area.
### §492b. Biannual briefing on nuclear weapons and related activities

(a) In General.—On or about May 1 and November 1 of each year, the officials specified in subsection (b) shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on matters relating to nuclear weapons policies, operations, technology development, and other similar topics as requested by such committees.

(b) Officials Specified.—The officials specified in this subsection are the following:

(1) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition.

(2) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs.

(3) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy.

(4) The Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration.

(5) The Director for Strategy, Plans, and Policy of the Joint Staff.

(6) The Director for Capability and Resource Integration for the United States Strategic Command.

(c) Delegation.—An official specified in subsection (b) may delegate the authority to provide a briefing under subsection (a) to a member of the Senior Executive Service who reports to the official.

(d) Termination.—The requirement to provide a briefing under subsection (a) shall terminate on January 1, 2028.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title XVI, §1631, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2934.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

As enacted by Pub. L. 117–263, "SEC." preceding section designation and catchline text were editorially conformed to the style used in this title.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.206 What employees are covered by FTCA for non-medical-related claims? ( a ) Permanent employees;
( b ) Temporary employees;
( c ) Persons providing services without compensation in carrying out a contract;
( d ) Persons required because of their employment by a self-determination contractor to serve non-IHS beneficiaries (even if the services are provided in facilities not owned by the contractor); and
( e ) Federal employees assigned to the contract.
To: File From: Elizabeth Kohl, DOE GC-71
Date: June 26, 2009 Re: Ex parte discussion on rare earth phosphors

On June 12, 2009, Mahima Gupta and Robert Carm ichael of Navigant Consulting spoke via phone with Mark Smith, CEO, Molycorp Minerals . Ms. Gupta and Mr. Carmichael asked Mr. Smith about the supply of rare earth phosphors as it relates to the final ru le for general service fluorescent and incandescent reflector lamps.

Mr. Smith noted that MolyCorp has several stockp iles of rare earth ore an d operates the mine in Mountain Pass, Ca. They are in the first of thre e phases in ramping to fu ll products. The third phase is mining. They have all the permits necessar y. Molycorp’s plan is to ramp to 40 tons of europium (Eu) oxide annually. The company is also exploring four promising other sites around the world, which are as yet unannounced.

End of conversation.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 605

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that communities should

implement the Amber Plan to expedite the recovery of abducted children.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Mrs. WILSON (for herself, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. FROST,

Mr. OXLEY, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. FOLEY, Mr.

GREENWOOD, and Mr. VISCLOSKY) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

communities should implement the Amber Plan to expedite the recovery of abducted children.

Whereas communities should implement an emergency alert

plan such as the Amber Plan to expedite the recovery of

abducted children;

Whereas the Amber Plan, a partnership between law enforcement agencies and media officials, assists law enforcement, parents, and local communities to respond immediately to the most serious child abduction cases;

Whereas the Amber Plan was created in 1996 in memory of

9-year-old Amber Hagerman who was kidnapped and

murdered in Arlington, Texas;
2

•HRES 605 IH

Whereas in response to community concern, the Association

of Radio Managers with the assistance of area law enforcement in Arlington, Texas, created the Amber Plan;

Whereas, to date, the Amber Plan is credited with saving the

lives of at least 9 children nationwide;

Whereas the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children endorses the Amber Plan and is promoting the use

of such emergency alert plans nationwide;

Whereas the Amber Plan is responsible for reuniting children

with their searching parents: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Amber Plan is a powerful tool in fighting

3 child abductions and should be used across the United

4 States.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.57 What if the Indian tribe or tribal organization chooses not to take title to property furnished or acquired under the contract?

If the Indian tribe or tribal organization chooses not to take title to property furnished by the government or acquired with contract funds, title to the property remains vested in the Secretary. A list of Federally-owned property to be used under the contract shall be included in the contract.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.186 Is it necessary for a self-determination contract to include any clauses about Federal Tort Claims Act coverage? No, it is optional. At the request of Indian tribes and tribal organizations, self-determination contracts shall include the following clauses to clarify the scope of FTCA coverage: ( a ) The following clause may be used for all contracts: For purposes of Federal Tort Claims Act coverage, the contractor and its employees (including individuals performing personal services contracts with the contractor to provide health care services) are deemed to be employees of the Federal government while performing work under this contract. This status is not changed by the source of the funds used by the contractor to pay the employee's salary and benefits unless the employee receives additional compensation for performing covered services from anyone other than the contractor.
( b ) The following clause is for IHS contracts only:
Under this contract, the contractor's employee may be required as a condition of employment to provide health services to non-IHS beneficiaries in order to meet contractual obligations. These services may be provided in either contractor or non-contractor facilities. The employee's status for Federal Tort Claims Act purposes is not affected.
### §21a. Amendment of articles of association

Except as otherwise specifically provided by law, or by the articles of association of the particular national banking association, the articles of association of a national banking association may be amended with respect to any lawful matter, and any action requiring the approval of the stockholders of such association may be had by the approving vote of the holders of a majority of the voting shares of the stock of the association obtained at a meeting of the stockholders called and held pursuant to notice given by mail at least ten days prior to the meeting or pursuant to a waiver of such notice given by all stockholders entitled to receive notice of such meeting. A certified copy of every amendment to the articles of association adopted by the shareholders of a national banking association shall be forwarded to the Comptroller of the Currency, to be filed and preserved in his office.

(Pub. L. 86–230, §13, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 458.)
§ 226.2 Sale of leases. ( a ) Written application, together with any nomination fee, for tracts to be offered for lease shall be filed with the Superintendent.
( b ) The Superintendent, with the consent of the Osage Tribal Council, shall publish notices for the sale of oil leases, gas leases, and oil and gas leases to the highest responsible bidder on specific tracts of the unleased Osage Mineral Estate. The Superintendent may require any bidder to submit satisfactory evidence of his good faith and ability to comply with all provisions of the notice of sale. Successful bidders must deposit with the Superintendent on day of sale a check or cash in an amount not less than 25 percent of the cash bonus offered as a guaranty of good faith. Any and all bids shall be subject to the acceptance of the Osage Tribal Council and approval of the Superintendent. Within 20 days after notification of being the successful bidder, and said bidder must submit to the Superintendent the balance of the cash bonus, a $10 filing fee, and the lease in completed form. The Superintendent may extend the time for the completion and submission of the lease form, but no extension shall be granted for remitting the balance of moneys due. If the bidder fails to pay the full cash consideration within said period or fails to file the completed lease within said period or extention thereof, or if the lease is rejected through no fault of the Osage Tribal Council or the Superintendent, 25 percent of the cash bonus bid will be forfeited for the use and benefits of the Osage Tribe. The Superintendent may reject a lease made on an accepted bid, upon evidence satisfactory to him of collusion, fraud, or other irregularity in connection with the notice of sale. The Superintendent may approve oil leases, gas leases, and oil and gas leases made by the Osage Tribal Council in conformity with the notice of sale, regulations in this part, bonds, and other instruments required.
( c ) Each oil and/or gas lease and activities and installations associated therewith subject to these regulations shall be assessed and evaluated for its environmental impact prior to its approval by the Superintendent.
( d ) Lessee shall accept a lease with the understanding that a mineral not covered by his lease may be leased separately.
( e ) No lease, assignment thereof, or interest therein will be approved to any employee or employees of the Government and no such employee shall be permitted to acquire any interest in leases covering the Osage Mineral Estate by ownership of stock in corporations having leases or in any other manner.
( f ) The Osage Tribal Council may utilize the following procedures among others, in entering into a mining lease. A contract may be entered into through competitive bidding as outlined in § 226.2(b), negotiation, or a combination of both. The Osage Tribal Council may also request the Superintendent to undertake the preparation, advertisement and negotiation. The Superintendent may approve any such contract made by the Osage Tribal Council.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0001005229                   
<NAME>                   COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998                                   
<CASH>                                          11,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    107,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               283,535
<PP&E>                                         120,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 751,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,404
<BONDS>                                        443,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           137
<OTHER-SE>                                     174,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   751,733
<SALES>                                        510,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               510,865
<CGS>                                          382,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  382,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,382
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,517
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,865
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0   
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,865
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
        



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Michael Silver, Appellant, v Donna Akerson, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 353]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Edlitz, J.), entered October 3, 2005, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Thompson, S.M.) entered June 27, 2005, which, after a hearing, denied his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to an order of the Support Magistrate denying his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation set forth *488in a stipulation of settlement incorporated but not merged in the parties’ judgment of divorce. The father failed to demonstrate an unreasonable and unanticipated change in circumstances since the time of the stipulation to justify a modification *(see Matter of Terjesen v Terjesen, 29*AD3d 705 [2006]).

Although the father correctly notes that his child support obligation terminates as to each child when the child reaches the age of 21, neither child had reached the age of 21 at the time the father petitioned for downward modification.

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.E, Krausman, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
### §8619. Leases of waterfront property from States or municipalities

In leasing waterfront property from a State or municipality, the Secretary of the Navy may provide in the lease, where it is required by state law or municipal charter, that, as part or all of the consideration, any improvements placed upon the property by the United States become the property of the lessor when the lease, including any renewal, ends.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 446, §7219; renumbered §8619, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7219 | 34 U.S.C. 521. | July 1, 1918, ch. 114, 40 Stat. 705 (2d par.). |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7219 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bio-One Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Armand
Dauplaise, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         a.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         b.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Armand Dauplaise
--------------------
By: Armand Dauplaise, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 13, 2002
1 

### VonDemHagen, Rebecca

From: Steve Slavik <sslavik@diversifoam.com>

Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 3:22 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy

Cc: atsheppard.margaret@epa.gov; Vo nDemHagen, Rebecca; 'Ben Sachs' Subject: Hydrofluorocarbons Regulation

Dear Ms.Newburg,



### My	name	is	Steve	Slavik;	I	am	th e	Vice	President	of	Operations for	DiversiFoam	Products,	in	Rockford,
Minnesota.		We	have	been	manufac turing	extruded	polystyrene	foa m	insulation	since	1985	and	employ about	90	people.		I	am	writing	to you	because	I	recently	became aware	of	the	President’s Climate	Action Plan	(CAP)	and	its	effort	to	red uce	the	emissions	of	hydrofluor ocarbons	(HFC’s).			We	are	currently	using HFC’s	as	a	blowing	agent	to	make our	insulation	boards	and	are not	aware	of	any	feasible	alternative	to replace	them.		One	of	the	greatest	challenges	for	our	small	com pany	is	the	limited	technical	resources	we	have available.		If	HFC’s	are	eliminated	we	will	have	to	completely rely	on	our	suppliers	to	develop	a	feasible alternative	and	if	they	are	succ essful	it	will	require	a	signif icant	amount	of	time	and	m oney	for	us	to	make	the conversion,		including	having	to	redesign	screws,	barrels,	dies ,	metering	equipment	and storage	equipment. In	addition,	we	will	have	to	rete st	our	finished	products	to	en sure	compliance	with	the	building	codes	and apply	for	an	operating	permit	modification	from	our	Pollution	C ontrol	Agency.

It	would	be	greatly	appreciated	i f	you	would	take	into	account our	concerns	when	considering	the	regulation
of	HFC’s.

Sincerely,

Steve Slavik Vice President of Operations
DiversiFoam Product
763 477 3215
#### § 61.12 Appeals.

Appeals from or on behalf of tribal members or applicants who have been denied enrollment must be in writing and must be filed pursuant to part 62 of this chapter. When the appeal is on behalf of more than one person, the name of each person must be listed in the appeal. A copy of part 62 of this chapter shall be furnished with each notice of adverse action.