alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006294EN.01003302.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/33

---

Action brought on 9 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-410/06)

(2006/C 294/58)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell and G. Braga da Cruz, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | a declaration that, by failing to adopt (all) the laws, regulations and legislative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/15/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

a declaration that, by failing to adopt (all) the laws, regulations and legislative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/15/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of that directive;

1

| — | an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 23 March 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 80. p. 35.

1

---
### §112. Prohibition on disclosure of name of minor children

The debtor may be required to provide information regarding a minor child involved in matters under this title but may not be required to disclose in the public records in the case the name of such minor child. The debtor may be required to disclose the name of such minor child in a nonpublic record that is maintained by the court and made available by the court for examination by the United States trustee, the trustee, and the auditor (if any) serving under section 586(f) of title 28, in the case. The court, the United States trustee, the trustee, and such auditor shall not disclose the name of such minor child maintained in such nonpublic record.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title II, §233(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 74.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-153 

July 31, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4044 Allocation of Assets 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter to this Office requesting that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the

"PBGC") reconsider its decision to disallow a waiver of benefits by * * * with respect to an allocation of assets under

* * * (the "Plan"). 

It appears that * * * waived his benefit, and the Plan then submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") its

application for a determination containing an allocation of assets incorporating * * * waiver. * * * was an employee

described in Section 401(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, and IRS approved the proposed allocation. It appears also

that the Plan is a sufficient plan without the waiver, that the purpose of the waiver is to allow non-eligible employees to

receive retirement benefits under the Plan, and that any gains on trust assets accumulated during the period of plan

termination will be used for the benefit of plan participants. Under these circumstances the PBGC will not object to *

* * waiver. 

I hope this is of assistance to you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### Rosalie Mayer, Respondent, *v.*Max Friedman, Appellant.

(Argued. March 19, 1877;

decided March 27, 1877.)

Reported below, 7 Hun, 218.

*Robert N.*Waite, for appellant.

*E. Goldsmith,*for respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion of court below.

All concur.

J udgment affirmed.
[No. 8246.]

#### ROLLINS V. FEARNLEY INVESTMENT AND REAL ESTATE CO.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals, 25 Colo. App. 85, affirming the judgment of the District Court which was founded upon sufficient evidence and the proper application of the law, affirmed.

*Error to the Court of Appeals.*

*496Mr. William H. Young, and Mr. James H. Brown, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. George E. Dunklee, Mr. Edward V. Dunklee, Mr. Allen C. Phelps, and Mr. O. E. Jackson, for defendants in error.

*Per Curiam:*

In *Rollins v. Fearnley Investment and Real Estate Company et al.,*25 Colo. App. 85, 136 Pac. 95, the judgment of the District Court of Arapahoe County was affirmed, and plaintiff in error prosecutes a writ of error in this court to the judgment of the court of appeals.

We are satisfied, after a full and critical examination of the entire record in the case, that the findings of fact and conclusions of law reached by the District Court were correct. The Court of Appeals, upon the record, reached a like conclusion, which seems to us also to be fully warranted on the facts and law. Being satisfied that the findings of fact in the case are abundantly supported by the evidence, and that the law applicable to the facts has been properly applied, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, as well as the judgment of the District Court, should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Let the remittitur issue to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Decision *en banc.*
Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, David Guthrie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. for the
period ending June 30, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 22, 2005

/s/David Guthrie
David Guthrie, President (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 83.35 What opportunity to comment will there be after OFA issues the proposed finding? ( a ) Publication of notice of the proposed finding will be followed by a 120-day comment period. During this comment period, the petitioner or any individual or entity may submit the following to OFA to rebut or support the proposed finding: ( 1 ) Comments, with citations to and explanations of supporting evidence; and
( 2 ) Evidence cited and explained in the comments.
( b ) Any individual or entity that submits comments and evidence must provide the petitioner with a copy of their submission.
### [§2410r. Renumbered §2387]
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*Charles Thomas, Defendant-Appellee.

(No. 74-238;

.Third District

January 14, 1975.

C. Brent Bode, State’s Attorney, of Pekin, for the People.

Patrick Tuite, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE STOUDER

delivered the opinion of the court:

A four-count information was filed charging defendant, Charles Thomas, with obscenity in violation of section 11 — 20(a) (3) of the Criminal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 11 — 20(a)(3)). The State appeals pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(a) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 604(a)) from an order of the Circuit' Court of Tazewell County dismissing the cause for want of prosecution.

Both parties joined in a motion for continuance based partially on the unavailability of essential witnesses. The motion was denied and the trial judge, Judge Reardon, called for voir dire examination of prospective jurors. The assistant State’s Attorney declined to proceed with voir dire, and defense counsel renewed his motion for continuance. Judge Reardon then dismissed the case for “want of prosecution” and the People appeal from this ruling. Defendant did not file a brief on appeal.

 The sole issue here is whether the court on its own motion before trial could dismiss the charges for want of prosecution. In accord with *People v.*Guido, 11 Ill.App.3d 1067, 297 N.E.2d 18, *People v. Hoover,*12.Ill.App.3d 25, 297 N.E.2d 400, *People v. Barksdale,*110 Ill.App.2d 163, 249 N.E.2d 165, and *People v. Shick,*101 Ill.App.2d 377, 243 N.E.2d 285, we hold that in the absence of one of the grounds set forth in section *908114 — 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 114 — 1), the action of the trial court was improper. Where the motion for a continuance has been properly denied the case should be called for trial, and if no evidence or insufficient evidence is presented by the People, then a judgment of acquittal may be entered by the court.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the Circuit Court of Tazewell County is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

STENGEL and BARRY, JJ., concur.
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_2\Routes_AltD.pdf

Location in Arizona

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Travel Management

Alternative D

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Map 2-22

Legend

Data Source:

OHV and Route Alternative Designations: BLM 2006

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: U.S. Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Note:

 Land use allocations, designations, and management 

 prescriptions apply only to public lands administered

 by the BLM. If non-Federal lands are acquired, they

 would be managed according to the allocations

 depicted on the map.

Off-highway Vehicle Designations

Reference Information

Access Points

Access through Private Land

Access through State Trust Land

Access through Indian Land

Access through Public Land

Limited to Designated Roads and Trails

Route Designations

Surface Management

American Indian Reservation

Military Reservations

State Trust Lands

State, County, City; Wildlife, Park and Outdoor Recreation

Areas

Private

Bureau of Land Management

Pima County

National Park Service

Bureau of Reclamation

Motorized

Non-motorized

Reclamation
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. SALVADOR

DE JESUS SANC HEZ M IR ANDA, a .k.a . Sa lva dor Je sus Sanc he z , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-50225

D.C . No. 3:10-c r-07000-AJB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Anthony J. B atta glia , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 20, 2016 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TASHIM A, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. Sa lva dor De Je sus Sa

nc he z M iranda

a p pe a ls from the re voc ation of supe rvise d re le a se and the tim e -se rve d se nte nc e im pose d upon re voc ation. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sa nc he z M iranda ’ s c ounse l 

# FIL ED JAN 25 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).ha s file d a

brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c ord. B e c a use Sanc he z M iranda

ha s fully se rve d his se nte nc e and is not subje c t to a te rm o f supe rvise d re le a s e d , we dism iss this a ppe a l a s m oot. Se e Spe nc e r v . K e mna , 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998); Unite d State s v . Palomba , 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th C ir. 1999). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D . DISM I SSE D.

1 5 - 5 0 2 2 5 2
§ 518.10 What must a self-regulating tribe provide the Commission to maintain its self-regulatory status? Each tribe that holds a certificate of self-regulation shall be required to submit the following information by April 15 of each year following the first year of self-regulation, or within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year of the gaming operation, as required by 25 CFR 571.13: ( a ) An annual independent audit, to be filed with the Commission, as required by 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(2)(C); and
( b ) A complete resume for all employees of the tribal regulatory body hired and licensed by the tribe subsequent to its receipt of a certificate of self-regulation, to be filed with the Office of Self-Regulation.
Failure to submit the information required by this section may result in revocation of a certificate of self-regulation. [78 FR 20241, Apr. 4, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 37115, June 20, 2013]
#### Hunding Dairy Company et al. *v.*Piper.

[No. 12,374.

Filed November 17, 1925.]

From Industrial Board of Indiana.

Proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act between Hunding Dairy Company and others and Mrs. Roy Piper. From the award rendered, the former appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*White, Wright & McKay*and *William Greene,*for appellants. *Charles S. Lundin,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Award affirmed.
# C_2007010EN.01000801.xml

| 16.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 January 2007

(2007/C 10/09)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2941 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,00 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4520 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,65845 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0829 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6127 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,99 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3290 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5784 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,765 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,10 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6976 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8693 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3916 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,815 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8467 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6503 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5108 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0926 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8630 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9952 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 214,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3305 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0834 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3642 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 795,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5378 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,204 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,503 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2941

JPY

Japanese yen

156,00

DKK

Danish krone

7,4520

GBP

Pound sterling

0,65845

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0829

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6127

ISK

Iceland króna

90,99

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3290

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5784

CZK

Czech koruna

27,765

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,10

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6976

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8693

RON

Romanian leu

3,3916

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,815

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8467

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6503

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5108

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0926

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8630

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9952

KRW

South Korean won

1 214,51

ZAR

South African rand

9,3305

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0834

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3642

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 795,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5378

PHP

Philippine peso

63,204

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3750

THB

Thai baht

46,503

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of June 1, 2012, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and
Certificate Administrator, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank,
National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating
Advisor and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-GCJ7 (the
"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
   January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of
   its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my
   supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th
day of March 2014.


Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  

  

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of APT Systems, Inc. (the "Company”) for the year ended January 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Hussey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

  

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-84 

June 18, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] Miscellaneous 

OPINION: 

 This has reference to your letter of June 2, 1976, to Mr. which I have been asked to answer. 

As I explained in our telephone conversation of June 1, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation takes the position

that its determinations, when communicated as final decisions by the Executive Director, constitute final agency action

for purposes of exhausting administrative remedies. Accordingly, the PBGC would not urge an exhaustion defense in

any proceedings in federal district court brought subsequent to issuance of such a decision. I cannot therefore advise

you as to the existence of "additional administrative remedies." 

Christine O. Cook 

Attorney 

Office of the General Counsel