alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006178EN.01000901.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/9

---

Judgement of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany)) — Sachsenmilch AG v Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg

(Case C-196/05) (1)

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Subheading 0406 10 (fresh cheese) - Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1832/2002 - Tariff classification of pizza mozzarella in block form that has been stored after its manufacture for one to two weeks at a low temperature)

(2006/C 178/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sachsenmilch AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Munchen — Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 of 11 September 2003 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p.1) — Subheading 0406 10 CN (fresh cheese) — Mozzarella for pizza that has been stored after production for one to two weeks at low temperature

Operative part of the judgement

The Court:

Subheading 0406 10 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1832/2002 of 1 August 2002, must be interpreted as meaning that it applies to pizza mozzarella in block form that was stored after its manufacture for one to two weeks at 2 to 4 °C unless that storage is sufficient for such mozzarella to undergo a process at the end of which it has acquired one or more new objective characteristics or properties, in particular with regard to its composition, appearance or taste. It is for the national court to determine whether those conditions are satisfied.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.

1

---
#### § 13.36 Post-hearing briefs.

The ALJ may require the parties to file post-hearing briefs. In any event, any party may file a post-hearing brief. The ALJ will fix the time for filing such briefs. Such briefs may be accompanied by proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ may permit the parties to file reply briefs.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



---

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ramsey K. Hamadi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |        |  | /s/ Ramsey K. Hamadi   
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  | Name:  |  | Ramsey K. Hamadi       
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2006326EN.01005501.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/55

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 November 2006 — Lichtwer Pharma AG v OHIM — Laboratoire Lafon (Lyco-A)

(Case T-32/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Lyco-A - Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - Cost of proceedings - Apportionment)

(2006/C 326/117)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Lichtwer Pharma AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Weberndörfer, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Laboratoire L. Lafon SA (Maisons-Alfort, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 November 2003 (Case R 1007/2002-4) insofar as that decision rules on the apportionment of the costs incurred in the opposition and appeal proceedings

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls paragraph 2 of the operative part of the decision of 13 November 2003 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case R 1007/2002-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls paragraph 2 of the operative part of the decision of 13 November 2003 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case R 1007/2002-4);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Tony Scullion, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 16, 2004 /s/ Tony ScullionTony ScullionChief Executive Officer
#### George B. Rockwell, et al., Appellants, *v.*Patrick A. Ginnelly, et al., Respondents.

(Argued April 3, 1877;

decided April 10, 1877.)

*John*Townshend, for appellants.

*N. C.*Moak, for respondents.

This case presented the same questions, and was argued and decided with *Rockwell v. McGovern, ante,*p. 294.
-  Home 
-  107 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107.205

## Section §107.205: Notice

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 107.205 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
#### § 162.538 What is the purpose of a WSR lease?

A WSR lease authorizes a lessee to possess Indian land to conduct activities related to the installation, operation, and maintenance of wind and/or solar energy resource development projects. Activities include installing instrumentation facilities and infrastructure associated with the generation, transmission, and storage of electricity and other related activities. Leases for biomass or waste-to-energy purposes are governed by subpart D of this part.
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED ISSUERS





AEP Texas Central Company (the "Servicer"), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Transition Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond),  (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (3)(ii) (allocation and remittance), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent  registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.





Date: March 28, 2016





AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY,


as Servicer








/s/ Julia A. Sloat


Name:  Julia A. Sloat


Title: Treasurer and Senior Officer in Charge of


the Servicing Function, AEP Texas Central Company, as Servicer
### §1701m. Credit and cancellation of notes transferred from Reconstruction Finance Corporation; net loss computation

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed from time to time to credit and cancel the note or notes of the Housing and Home Finance Administrator executed and delivered in connection with loans transferred from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to the Housing and Home Finance Agency pursuant to Reorganization Plan Numbered 23 of 1950 (64 Stat. 1279), to the extent of the net loss, as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, sustained by said Agency in the liquidation of defaulted loans. The net loss shall be the sum of the unpaid principal and advances for care and preservation of collateral, together with accrued and unpaid interest on said principal and advances, and all expenses and costs (other than those subject to administrative expense limitations) in connection with the liquidation of defaulted loans, less the amount actually realized by the Housing and Home Finance Agency on account of such defaulted loans.

(July 14, 1952, ch. 723, §9, 66 Stat. 603.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Reorganization Plan Numbered 23 of 1950, referred to in text, is set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Housing Act of 1952, and not as part of the National Housing Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions, powers, and duties of Housing and Home Finance Agency and its Administrator transferred to and vested in Secretary of Housing and Urban Development by Pub. L. 89–174, §5, Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 669, classified to section 3534 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### Termination and Liquidation of Reconstruction Finance Corporation

Termination on June 30, 1954, of Reconstruction Finance Corporation and liquidation thereof, see sections 608 and 609 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and notes thereunder.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Abolition of Reconstruction Finance Corporation

Section 6(a) of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1957, eff. June 30, 1957, 22 F.R. 4633, 71 Stat. 647, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, abolished Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 
-  Pipeline Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  Valve Rule Overview 
                      -  Valve Rule Fact Sheet 
                      -  Valve Rule Resources 
                      -  Valve Rule Communication 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Pipeline Rulemaking Implementation                   

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Fax:**202-366-4566****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Valve Rule Overview

## Objectives

PHMSA is revising the Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations applicable to most newly constructed and entirely replaced onshore gas transmission, Type A gas gathering, and hazardous liquid pipelines with diameters of 6 inches or greater. In the revised regulations, PHMSA requires operators of these lines to install rupture-mitigation valves (i.e., remote-control or automatic shut-off valves) or alternative equivalent technologies, and establishes minimum performance standards for those valves' operation to prevent or mitigate the public safety and environmental consequences of pipeline ruptures.

This final rule establishes requirements for rupture-mitigation valve spacing, maintenance and inspection, and risk analysis.

The final rule also requires operators of gas and hazardous liquid pipelines to contact 9-1-1 emergency call centers immediately upon notification of a potential rupture and conduct post-rupture investigations and reviews. Operators must also incorporate lessons learned from such investigations and reviews into operators' personnel training and qualifications programs, and in design, construction, testing, maintenance, operations, and emergency procedure manuals and specifications.

PHMSA is promulgating these regulations in response to congressional directives following major pipeline incidents where there were significant environmental consequences or losses of human life. The revisions are intended to achieve better rupture identification, response, and mitigation of safety, greenhouse gas, and environmental justice impacts.

**2022 Valve Final Rule Publication Date:** 4/8/2022**Effective Date:** October 5, 2022 and April 10, 2023
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lanbo Financial Group, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Yulong Wan, Chief
Financial Officer of Lanbo Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.


Dated:  May 16, 2005                                     /s/ Yulong Wan
                                                         ------------------
                                                         Yulong Wan
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### § 308.4 Revocation of privilege of attaching certificates.

If an enterprise, after securing the privilege of attaching the certificates, should fail to meet the above-named conditions, the Board reserves the right to revoke the privilege.
Exhibit 32.2 to 2008 10-Q

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of Convergys Corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2008 (the Report), I, Earl C. Shanks, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Earl C. Shanks     
|Earl C. Shanks         
|Chief Financial Officer

November 5, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Convergys Corporation and will be retained by Convergys Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
-  Home 
-  Registration 

# In This Section

                      -  Registration Overview 
                      -  Registration Information 
                      -  Registration Online 
                      -  Registration by Mail 
                      -  Registration International 

# Registration by Mail Brochure

Registration-Brochure-2023-2024-final.pdf (782.98 KB)

A discussion of who must register, when and howto register, the cost of registration, and other important registration information.

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 474 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 13, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. 
Res. 290) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government 
for fiscal year 2001, revising the congressional budget for the United States 
Government for fiscal year 2000, and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels 
for each of fiscal years 2002 through 2005. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read. The conference report shall be debatable for 
one hour equally divided and controlled by chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on the Budget.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```