alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-111 

September 16, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4062(d) Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans. Corporate Reorganizations 

OPINION: 

 In your letter of September 3, 1976, you have represented the following: 

It is anticipated that on October 1, 1976, * * * will purchase certain assets and assume certain contracts of the * *

* Company * * * with respect to the North American operations of the * * * As a result of such purchase, approximately

* * * employees will cease to be employed by and will be offered employment by * * * No employee benefit plans,

including pension plans, covering such employees during their period of employment by * * * will be assumed or

maintained by * * * on or after such date. The agreement between * * * and * * * specifically provides that * * * "is not

and will not be assuming, continuing or maintaining any employee benefit plan or any assets of any such plan maintained

by * * * or any of its affiliates for its employees." It is understanding that * * * intends to continue to maintain the * *

* plans for * * * remaining employees, but this of course is a matter which is entirely beyond * * * control. 

You have requested a determination from us as to whether on the basis of the above facts, * * * would be [*2]

deemed a successor corporation for purposes of Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,

regardless of any subsequent action or inaction on the part of * * * with respect to its existing plans covering these

employees. 

 Based on the facts as you have represented them, we see no grounds for regarding * * * as a successor corporation

to * * * with respect to any existing plans maintained by * * * and not assumed by * * * 

You have not requested and we express no opinion with respect to the impact of Title IV of the Act on * * * and its

existing plans when and if the proposed transaction is effected. 

We trust the above has been of assistance to you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Mueller, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      John P. MuellerJohn
      P. MuellerChief
      Financial Officer





Date:
August 7, 2009
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20267

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO ZAMARRON-CERVANTES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CR-272-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 23, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Zamarron-Cervantes appeals his sentence imposed by the

district court for being present in the United States, without

permission, following deportation. He argues that the district

court did not provide notice of the specific grounds that it intended

to use for an upward departure and that the district court improperly

departed upward from the Sentencing Guidelines.

A district court may depart upward from the guidelines if

the court finds that an aggravating circumstance exists that was 
No. 98-20267

-2-

not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing

Commission in formulating the guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b).

The district court must state “the specific reason for the

imposition of a sentence” outside the guideline range. 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(c)(2). A district court’s decision to depart from the

guidelines is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States

v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). A

departure from the guidelines will be affirmed on appeal if

(1) the district court gives acceptable reasons for departing,

and (2) the extent of the departure is reasonable. Id. 

A sentencing court must provide the parties an opportunity

to comment upon matters relating to the appropriate sentence. 

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(1). Rule 32, Fed. R. Crim. P., requires

that the district court give the parties reasonable notice that

it is contemplating making an upward departure. Burns v. United

States, 501 U.S. 129, 138 (1991). “This notice must specifically

identify the ground on which the district court is contemplating

an upward departure.” Id. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion

in departing upward from the Sentencing Guidelines. The district

court provided adequate reasons for its incremental upward

departures. The district court demonstrated proper reliance on

the guideline levels and consideration of the number and type of

crimes committed. The departure was not unreasonably excessive in

light of the defendant’s extensive criminal history. A review of

the record indicates that the Presentence Report addressed the
No. 98-20267

-3-

possibility of an upward departure and the grounds therefor and

provided Zamarron-Cervantes with adequate notice.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-121 

December 22, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043(b)(3) Reportable Events. Decrease in Participants 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of * * * referred to this Corporation by * * * 

* * * You ask whether the above-referenced plan has experienced a reportable event under Section 4043(b)(3) of

the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) due to reductions in participation during the previous

two plan years. 

We understand that greater than 20% of the Plan's participants during the current plan year have been separated from

employment and that the number of employed plan participants is more than 25% lower than the total plan participants

employed at the beginning of the immediate preceding plan year. For purposes of Section 4043(b)(3) of the Act, active

participants are those employed by an employer maintaining the Plan. Where such a participant is separated from

employment or laid-off, he is no longer an active participant. 

Assuming that the Plan is covered by Section 4021 of the Act, Section 4043(b)(3) prescribes that a reportable event

has occurred under these circumstances. The plan administrator must notify the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,

Division of Plan Review, of the occurrence of such [*2] event as soon as possible. 

 If you have any questions please contact * * * of my staff at * * * 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
**CURCIO**

**+COHEN**

 

 

**Report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examined management’s assertion, includedin the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2016 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with RegulationAB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s RegulationAB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’sReport. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisoror operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’sReport. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsiblefor the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestationstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as weconsidered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selected sample of the servicing activities relatedto the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria during the specified period. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performedby the Company during the period covered by this report. Our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance arisingfrom errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected the Company’s servicing activitiesduring the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examinationdoes not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied withthe aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactionsidentified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, for the Platform, is fairlystated in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen, CPA’s, P.C.
§ 601.23 The Environmental Impact Statement process. ( a ) The NCPC shall involve the applicant, Federal and District of Columbia agencies, members of the public and stakeholders in the preparation of an EIS. Public participation shall be required as part of the Public Scoping process and review of the Draft EIS. The NCPC shall also consult with agencies having jurisdiction by law or expertise. Agencies with “jurisdiction by law” are those with ultimate jurisdiction over a project and whose assistance may be required on certain issues and those with other kinds of regulatory or advisory authority with respect to the action or its effects on particular environmental resources.
( b ) To determine the scope of an EIS through a Public Scoping process, NCPC shall proceed as follows: ( 1 ) Disseminate a NOI in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1506.6.
( 2 ) Publish a NOI in the Federal Register and on NCPC's Web site which shall begin the Public Scoping process.
( 3 ) Include the date, time, and location of a Public Scoping meeting in the NOI. The public meeting shall be announced at least thirty (30) calendar days in advance of its scheduled date.
( 4 ) Hold Public Scoping meeting(s) in facilities that are accessible to the disabled; include translators if requested in advance; include signers or interpreters for the hearing impaired if requested in advance; and allow special arrangements for consultation with affected Indian tribes or other Native American groups who have environmental concerns that cannot be shared in a public forum.
( 5 ) Consider all comments received during the announced comment period regarding the analysis of alternatives, the affected environment, and identification of potential impacts.
( 6 ) Apply the provisions of this section to a Supplemental EIS if the Executive Director of NCPC, in his/her sole discretion, determines a Public Scoping process is required for a Supplemental EIS.
( c ) A Draft EIS shall be available to the public for their review and comment, for a period of generally forty-five (45) calendar days. The public comment period shall begin when NCPC shares a copy of the Draft EIS with EPA in anticipation of EPA's publication of an NOA. The NCPC shall hold at least one public meeting during the public comment period on a Draft EIS. The public meeting shall be announced at least thirty (30) calendar days in advance of its scheduled occurrence. The announcement shall identify the subject of the Draft EIS and include the public meeting date, time, and location.
# C_2006226EN.01000101.xml

| 20.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 September 2006

(2006/C 226/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2654 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4613 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67320 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1740 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5903 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,89 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2735 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5765 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,488 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,47 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9598 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5308 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,58 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,472 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8590 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6802 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4201 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8526 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9091 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0079 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 204,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3359 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0426 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4175 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 588,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,659 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,390 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9340 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,142 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2654

JPY

Japanese yen

148,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4613

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67320

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1740

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5903

ISK

Iceland króna

88,89

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2735

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5765

CZK

Czech koruna

28,488

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,47

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9598

RON

Romanian leu

3,5308

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,58

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,472

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8590

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6802

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4201

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8526

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9091

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0079

KRW

South Korean won

1 204,79

ZAR

South African rand

9,3359

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0426

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4175

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 588,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,659

PHP

Philippine peso

63,390

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9340

THB

Thai baht

47,142

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Women and Medicines:

What You Need to Know

Read this card to learn about:

• How medicines can work differently in women and

men.

• What you can do to help your medicines work best

for you.

Be aware of how your medicines—both prescription and

non-prescription medicines–affect your body. Discuss

any questions or symptoms you may have with your

pharmacist or provider. Work together to keep your

medicine safe and effective.

• Women’s bodies are different from men’s. This affects

the way chemicals are processed in the body.

• Hormones can affect how medicines work in women’s

bodies. For example, medication levels vary at

different times of the menstrual cycle. 

• Pregnant women need to consult their health care

provider before taking any medicine to avoid risks to

the fetus.

• As women age, their bodies process medicines

differently, including the same medicines they used at

younger ages.

Use the checklist on the back of this page to make sure

your medicine works for you.

For more information:

Call 1-800-358-9295 for a free copy of It’s Your Health:

Use Your Medication Safely (AHRQ Pub. No. 05-R021)

or contact

Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo, MD, MSc, PhD

Director, Women’s Health and Gender-Based Research

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Telephone: 301-427-1550

E-mail: rcorrea@ahrq.gov

Agency for Healthcare

Research and Quality

Advancing Excellence

in Health Care
Tips for Safe Medicine Use

Tell your health care provider–

✓ About allergies or bad reactions to medicines.

✓ If you are pregnant or plan to get pregnant soon.

Ask about your medicines—

✓ What are they used for?

✓ Are there any side effects you should watch for?

✓ Are they safe to take with your other medicines

and supplements?

✓ What is the correct way to take them–whole,

crushed, with food, with water, at the same time

every day?

✓ Should you drive while taking this medicine?

✓ Are there certain foods or drinks you should avoid

while using this medicine?

Make a list of your medicines, including nonprescription medicines and supplements.

✓ Keep the list current.

✓ Show it to your doctor and pharmacist at every

visit.

Try to get all your medicines at the same pharmacy

and ask your pharmacist to be sure they are safe if

you take them together.

Tell your provider or pharmacist if:

✓ There’s a change in how your medicines are

working.

✓ Your medicines seem to work differently during

different parts of your cycle.

If you need surgery or a procedure, ask if you should

stop taking medicines beforehand.

Be informed. Learn about the medicines you are

taking.

✓ Carefully read the printed information that comes

with your medicine.

✓ Use a reliable book and Internet sources such as

Medline Plus.

The brochure Your Medicine: Play It Safe (AHRQ Pub.

No. 03-0019) has more information on taking

medicines safely and a record form to keep track of your

medicines.

AHRQ Pub. No 03(05)-0019-A

April 2005
§ 291.6 What must the Secretary do upon receiving a proposal? Upon receipt of a proposal requesting Class III gaming procedures, the Secretary must: ( a ) Within 15 days, notify the Indian tribe in writing that the proposal has been received, and whether any information required under § 291.4 is missing;
( b ) Within 30 days of receiving a complete proposal, notify the Indian tribe in writing whether the Indian tribe meets the eligibility requirements in § 291.3. The Secretary's eligibility determination is final for the Department.
### §1714. Taxation

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to exempt any real property acquired and held by the Secretary under this subchapter from taxation by any State or political subdivision thereof, to the same extent, according to its value, as other real property is taxed.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title II, §208, 48 Stat. 1252; Feb. 3, 1938, ch. 13, §3, 52 Stat. 22; Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title I, §122, 64 Stat. 59; Pub. L. 90–19, §1(a)(3), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 17.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1967—Pub. L. 90–19 substituted "Secretary" for "Commissioner".

1950—Act Apr. 20, 1950, substituted "Commissioner" for "Administrator".

1938—Act Feb. 3, 1938, corrected error in spelling of "subdivision".
#### § 543.11 [Reserved]
§ 158.605 Exemption from other laws regarding compensation. The provisions of the following laws, among other similar laws, do not apply under CTMS, to the DHS-CS, or to talent management involving the individuals described in § 158.103: ( a ) The following provisions of 5 U.S.C.: ( 1 ) Chapter 51 regarding classification,
( 2 ) Chapter 53 regarding pay rates and systems (except section 5379 regarding student loan repayments),
( 3 ) Chapter 55, Subchapter V regarding premium pay (except section 5550a regarding compensatory time off for religious observances),
( 4 ) Chapter 61 regarding work schedules (except sections 6103-6104 regarding holidays),
( 5 ) Section 4502 regarding cash awards and time-off awards,
( 6 ) Section 4503 regarding agency awards (except regarding honorary recognition),
( 7 ) Section 4505a regarding performance-based cash awards,
( 8 ) Sections 4507 and 4507a regarding presidential rank awards,
( 9 ) Section 5307 regarding limitation on certain payments,
( 10 ) Section 5384 regarding performance awards for the Senior Executive Service,
( 11 ) Section 5753 regarding recruitment and relocation bonuses,
( 12 ) Section 5754 regarding retention bonuses,
( 13 ) Section 5755 regarding supervisory differentials, and
( 14 ) Section 5757 regarding extended assignment incentives;
( b ) The provisions of 29 U.S.C. 206 and 207 regarding minimum wage payments and overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended; and
( c ) The following provisions of 5 CFR: ( 1 ) Part 451 regarding awards (except regarding honorary recognition);
( 2 ) Part 511 regarding classification under the General Schedule;
( 3 ) Part 530 regarding pay rates and systems;
( 4 ) Part 531 regarding pay under the General Schedule;
( 5 ) Part 534 regarding pay under other systems;
( 6 ) Part 536 regarding grade and pay retention;
( 7 ) Part 550, subparts A regarding premium pay, I regarding pay for duty involving physical hardship or hazard, M regarding firefighter pay, N regarding compensatory time off for travel, and P regarding overtime pay for border patrol agents;
( 8 ) Part 551 regarding pay administration under the Fair Labor Standards Act;
( 9 ) Part 575 regarding recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives, supervisory differentials; and extended assignment incentives; and
( 10 ) Part 610 regarding hours of duty (except subpart B regarding holidays).