alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006331EN.01003102.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/31

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2006 — É.R. and Others v Council and Commission

(Case T-138/03) (1)

1

(Common Agricultural Policy - Animal health - Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (‘mad cow disease’) - New variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease - Action for damages - Non-contractual liability - Liability of the Community in the absence of wrongful conduct on the part of its bodies - Loss - Causation - Procedural defects - Parallel proceedings before national courts - Limitation - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 331/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: É.R., O.O., J.R., A.R., B.P.R. (Vaulx-en-Velin, France); T.D., J.D., D.D., V.D. (Palaiseau, France); D.E., É.E. (Ozoir-la-Ferrière; France); C.R. (Vichy, France); H.R., M.S.R., I.R., B.R., M.R. (Pau, France); and C.S. (Paris, France) (represented by: F. Honnorat, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendants: Council of the European Union (initially represented by: M. Balta and F. Ruggeri Laderchi, and later by: M. Balta and F. Florindo Gijón, Agents) and Commission of the European Communities (initially represented by: D. Booss and G. Berscheid, and later by: G. Berscheid and T. van Rijn, Agents)

Defendants:

Re:

Actions for damages pursuant to Article 235 EC and the second paragraph of Article 288 EC seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a consequence of the infection and subsequent death of members of their families who suffered from a new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, which was linked to the outbreak and spread in Europe of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, for which the Council and the Commission are responsible.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application as inadmissible in relation to É.R., O.O., J.R., A.R. and B.P.R.; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application as inadmissible in relation to É.R., O.O., J.R., A.R. and B.P.R.;

| 2. | Dismisses the application as unfounded as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the application as unfounded as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the applicants to pay three-quarters of the costs and the Council and the Commission to pay one-quarter of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the applicants to pay three-quarters of the costs and the Council and the Commission to pay one-quarter of the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 5.7.2003. This case was previously cited as U. and Others v Council and Commission.

1

---
----

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |
| 001-10315                | 63-0860407 |
| (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|                     |   |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| o | Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
| o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

----

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
| (d)    |  |   | Exhibits. |
|   |   |   |
| 99.1   |  |   | Press Release of HealthSouth Corporation, dated August 31, 2015. |
|   |   |
| 99.2   |  |   | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 28, 2015, by and among Advanced Homecare Management, Inc. (d/b/a Encompass Home Health & Hospice), EHH Merger Sub Corporation, CareSouth Health System, Inc., Capitol Partners I, L.P., Capitol Partners II, L.P., Capitol Partners III, L.P.,  Rick Griffin, John Southern and Capitol Partners L.L.C., as the sellers’ representative. |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION |
|   | By: | /s/  John P. Whittington |
|   | Name: | John P. Whittington |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President, General Counseland Corporate Secretary |
§ 7.11 Components' responsibilities. Each DHS component shall appoint a security officer or security liaison to implement this part. The security officer/security liaison shall: ( a ) Implement, observe, and enforce security regulations or procedures within their component with respect to the classification, declassification, safeguarding, handling, and storage of classified national security information;
( b ) Report violations of the provisions of this part to the Chief Security Officer committed by employees of their component, as required by implementing directives;
( c ) Ensure that employees of their component attend mandatory security education and training, as required by the DHS classified information security procedures, to include those component officials delegated the authority to classify information originally and those who perform derivative classification actions;
( d ) Continuously review the requirements for personnel access to classified information as a part of the continuous need-to-know evaluation, and initiate action to administratively withdraw or reduce the level of access authorized, as appropriate; and
( e ) Cooperate fully with any request from the Chief Security Officer for assistance in the implementation of this part.
#### Frederick D.R. Sampson, Appellant, v Yvonne Delaney, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[824 NYS2d 277]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered April 12, 2005, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint seeks a partition and sale of property that plaintiff jointly owns with defendant-respondent, with any equities arising out of unequal contributions or receipts to be determined at an accounting and paid out of the proceeds of the sale, and the balance of the proceeds to be divided equally between the parties. Such relief is premature. The parties’ respective rights and interests in the property, and the adjustment of any equities, must be determined before, not after, a sale (see *Ranninger v Pevsner,*306 AD2d 20 [2003]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
### Department of Energy Washington, DC20585 May 22, 1997

NOTICE OFPUBLIC WORKSHOP FORWATER HEATER ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS RULEMAKING
The Department ofEnergy is implementing the July 15, 1996, process rule which includes priority settingfor various products. The water heater energy efficiency standards rulemaking has been designated ahighpriority rulemaking. In addition, the procedures ofthe new process can be found in the July 15. 1996, Federal Register notice which outlines the planning and prioritization process, data collection and analysis. and decision making criteria. To initiatethis rulemaking, the Department is convening a workshop to propose the analytical framework for developing the water heaters standards. This workshop would include a discussion ofthe different methodologies and the relationships among various analyses. It would identify possible tools to beused and contractor qualifications, as well as, adiscussion of approaches to be taken forthe screening and engineering analysis. The workshop for water heater standards will be held on June 24, 1997, at the U.S. Department ofEnergy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.. Washington, DC. 20585-0121 in room 1E-245 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. I have enclosed apreliminary draft agenda forthe workshop. Ifyou have any questions, orplan to attend the workshop, orwish to obtain material for the workshop, please contact Bryan Berringer at (202) 586-0371. Sincerely,

Micnae''. lcCabe, Director Office ofCodes and Standards Building Technology, State and Community Programs Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Enclosure


# ®3BU Printed with soy ink on recycled paper
# C_2007020EN.01002901.xml

| 27.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/29

---

Action brought on 4 December 2006 — Calebus v Commission

(Case T-366/06)

(2007/C 20/44)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Calebus, S.A. (Almería, Spain) (represented by: R. Bocanegra Sierra, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 (OJ 2006 L 259, p.1) approving the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region, in relation to the inclusion of the farm ‘Las Cuerdas’ as a SCI ‘ES6110006 Ramblas de Gergal, Tabernas y Sur de Sierra Alhamilla’, appearing on that list, and order the Commission to change the delimitation of that SCI so as to exclude the farm referred to. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 (OJ 2006 L 259, p.1) approving the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region, in relation to the inclusion of the farm ‘Las Cuerdas’ as a SCI ‘ES6110006 Ramblas de Gergal, Tabernas y Sur de Sierra Alhamilla’, appearing on that list, and order the Commission to change the delimitation of that SCI so as to exclude the farm referred to.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its claims, the applicant submits that the contested decision is:

| — | contrary to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, (1) in so far as it includes some areas of the appellant's property in SCI ES 6110006 which lack the necessary environmental requirements; and |
| --- | --- |

—

contrary to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, (1) in so far as it includes some areas of the appellant's property in SCI ES 6110006 which lack the necessary environmental requirements; and

1

| — | arbitrary, in that it has excluded, in that same zone, areas which have the required environmental values which call for classification as a SCI. |
| --- | --- |

—

arbitrary, in that it has excluded, in that same zone, areas which have the required environmental values which call for classification as a SCI.

---

(1)  OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7

1

---
#### § 39.1000 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this subpart is to provide funds at the agency and area education offices for FY 1991 and future years for administration of all Bureau of Indian Affairs education functions, including but not limited to school operations, continuing education, early childhood education, post-secondary education and Johnson-O'Malley Programs.
# Fourth Cou rt of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 25, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00554

- CV

Kathleen BARRACO

, Appellant

v.

LEVY TOWNHOUSE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 19385

Honor able Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On October 14, 2015 , this court dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution

. On

October 29, 2015

, Appellant filed a motion for rehearing to reinstate the appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 49.1.

The panel has considered A ppellant’s motion for rehearing and Appellee’s response ; the

motion is GRANTED

. See id. R. 49.3. We withdraw our opinion and judgment of October 14,

2015, and reinstate this appeal on the court’s docket.

Appellant’s brief is due within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. See id. R.

38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED on November 25, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _

_______________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 18.9 Style.

Each document submitted by an agency for filing and publication shall conform to the current edition of the U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and other matters of style.

[54 FR 9681, Mar. 7, 1989]
§ 17.520 Job classification and structure. A recipient shall not: ( a ) Classify a job as being for males or for females;
( b ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority lists, career ladders, or tenure systems based on sex; or
( c ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority systems, career ladders, or tenure systems for similar jobs, position descriptions, or job requirements that classify persons on the basis of sex, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the positions in question as set forth in § 17.550.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, who is carrying out the
functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to an Amended
and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated January 1, 2014, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield
Property L.P., and certain other parties thereto, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Annual Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership.



Dated: April 2,
2014





| |  | /s/ John Stinebaugh                                   
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | John Stinebaugh                                       
| |  | Chief Financial Officer, Brookfield Property Group LLC
§ 115.83 Ongoing medical and mental health care for sexual abuse victims and abusers. ( a ) Each facility shall offer medical and mental health evaluation and, as appropriate, treatment to all detainees who have been victimized by sexual abuse while in immigration detention.
( b ) The evaluation and treatment of such victims shall include, as appropriate, follow-up services, treatment plans, and, when necessary, referrals for continued care following their transfer to, or placement in, other facilities, or their release from custody.
( c ) The facility shall provide such victims with medical and mental health services consistent with the community level of care.
( d ) Detainee victims of sexually abusive vaginal penetration by a male abuser while incarcerated shall be offered pregnancy tests. If pregnancy results from an instance of sexual abuse, the victim shall receive timely and comprehensive information about lawful pregnancy-related medical services and timely access to all lawful pregnancy-related medical services.
( e ) Detainee victims of sexual abuse while detained shall be offered tests for sexually transmitted infections as medically appropriate.
( f ) Treatment services shall be provided to the victim without financial cost and regardless of whether the victim names the abuser or cooperates with any investigation arising out of the incident.
( g ) The facility shall attempt to conduct a mental health evaluation of all known detainee-on-detainee abusers within 60 days of learning of such abuse history and offer treatment when deemed appropriate by mental health practitioners.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Policy 
-  Other Useful Links 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Other Useful Links

May 23, 2023
§ 100.110 Scope. ( a ) The term *expenditure* includes payments, gifts or other things of value described in this subpart.
( b ) For the purpose of this subpart, a payment made by an individual shall not be attributed to any other individual, unless otherwise specified by that other individual. To the extent that a payment made by an individual qualifies as a contribution, the provisions of 11 CFR 110.1(k) shall apply.
### §1830. Nondiscrimination

It is not the purpose of this chapter to discriminate in any manner against State nonmember banks or State savings associations and in favor of national or member banks or Federal savings associations, respectively. It is the purpose of this chapter to provide all banks and savings associations with the same opportunity to obtain and enjoy the benefits of this chapter.

(Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 967, §2[22], formerly §2[20], 64 Stat. 893; renumbered §2[21], Pub. L. 90–203, §3, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 610; renumbered §2[22], Pub. L. 91–508, title I, §101, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1114; amended Pub. L. 101–73, title II, §223, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 273.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Section is derived from subsec. (y) of former section 264 of this title. See Codification note set out under section 1811 of this title.

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "It is not the purpose of this chapter to discriminate in any manner against State nonmember banks and in favor of national or member banks; but the purpose is to provide all banks with the same opportunity to obtain and enjoy the benefits of this chapter. No bank shall be discriminated against because its capital stock is less than the amount required for eligibility for admission into the Federal Reserve System."
### §1706d. Applicability

The provisions of sections 1703 and 1706c of this title shall be applicable in the several States and Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title I, §9, as added July 14, 1952, ch. 723, §10(a)(1), 66 Stat. 603; amended Pub. L. 86–70, §10(a), June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 142; Pub. L. 86–624, §6, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 411; Pub. L. 91–152, title IV, §403(c)(3), Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 395; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §407(a)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1211; Pub. L. 100–242, title IV, §429(b), Feb. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1918.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–242 inserted "Applicability" as section catchline.

1983—Pub. L. 98–181 inserted "American Samoa," after "Pacific Islands,".

1969—Pub. L. 91–152 inserted "the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands," after "Guam,".

1960—Pub. L. 86–624 struck out "Hawaii," before "Puerto Rico".

1959—Pub. L. 86–70 struck out "Alaska," before "Hawaii".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
### [§9531. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §823(2), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1707]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 575, authorized Secretary of the Air Force to procure aircraft and equipment and facilities necessary for the maintenance and operation of the Air Force.
§ 43.6 Limitations on access. Educational institutions are not required to make available to students the following materials: ( a ) Financial records of the parents of the student or any information contained in those records.
( b ) Confidential letters and statements of recommendations, which were placed in any student's record prior to January 1, 1975, and which are not used for purposes other than those for which they were specifically intended.
( c ) Those records listed in § 43.2(e) which are exempt from the definition of *student records.*
§ 27.220 Tiering. ( a ) *Preliminary determination of risk-based tiering.* Based on the information the Department receives in accordance with §§ 27.200 and 27.205 (including information submitted through the Top-Screen process) and following its initial determination in § 27.205(a) that a facility presents a high level of security risk, the Department shall notify a facility of the Department's preliminary determination of the facility's placement in a risk-based tier.
( b ) *Confirmation or alteration of risk-based tiering.* Following review of a covered facility's Security Vulnerability Assessment, the Executive Assistant Director shall notify the covered facility of its final placement within a risk-based tier, or for covered facilities previously notified of a preliminary tiering, confirm or alter such tiering.
( c ) The Department shall place covered facilities in one of four risk-based tiers, ranging from highest risk facilities in Tier 1 to lowest risk facilities in Tier 4.
( d ) The Executive Assistant Director may provide the facility with guidance regarding the risk-based performance standards and any other necessary guidance materials applicable to its assigned tier.
[72 FR 17729, Apr. 9, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 41892, Aug. 4, 2021]
### [§1599. Renumbered §1611]
-  Home 

# In This Section

## Contact Us

Inspector Training & Qualifications 
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration3700 South MacArthur Blvd.Oklahoma City, OK73179United States

**Email:**PHMSAPipelineTraining@dot.gov**Phone:**405-686-2310****Fax:**405-686-2311****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm CT, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Contact Us

#### Inspector Training & Qualifications Division

**Director:**Lane Miller

**Instructor/ Pipeline Safety Specialists:**Bryan KichlerLeticia SantosWayne St. GermainSteven KirklandTyler Dean 

**Instructional Systems Specialist:**Tracy Sipe

**Training Information Specialist:**Jill Nelson

**Program Analyst**:Amanda Rogers

**Technical Writer/Editor**:Sharon Webb

**Training Center**

Located in Oklahoma City, PHMSA's Training & Qualifications (TQ) Training Center provides state-of-the-art training courses for Federal and State pipeline safety inspectors and investigators. The team of experienced instructors lead training courses that promote uniformity in the application of pipeline safety regulations through a professional mix of participant-centered classroom instruction, lab training, and field exercises. Additionally, TQ's instructors participate in State-hosted seminars throughout the country.

**Map to Training Center**

#### Pipeline State Program Managers

The National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives (NAPSR) is the national association representing state pipeline safety personnel in the contiguous United States as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. To contact State Program Managers, please visit the NAPSR website.