alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§1749bbb–10a to 1749bbb–10d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1749bbb–10a to 1749bbb–10d, comprising part C of this subchapter, terminated on Sept. 30, 1995, with certain exceptions, pursuant to former section 1749bbb(b) of this title.

Section 1749bbb–10a, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title XII, §1231, as added Pub. L. 91–609, title VI, §602(d), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1789; amended Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §452(b)(1)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1230, related to review of market availability, Government crime insurance, and termination of insurance.

Section 1749bbb–10b, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title XII, §1232, as added Pub. L. 91–609, title VI, §602(d), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1789; amended Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §452(b)(1), (3)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1230, related to use of existing facilities and services.

Section 1749bbb–10c, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title XII, §1233, as added Pub. L. 91–609, title VI, §602(d), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1790; amended Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §452(b)(1)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1230, related to establishment of affordable rates, factors considered, uniform national rates, and periodic modification.

Section 1749bbb–10d, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title XII, §1234, as added Pub. L. 91–609, title VI, §602(d), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1790; amended Pub. L. 96–470, title II, §205(a), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2244; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §452(b)(1)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1230; Pub. L. 101–137, §6(d), Nov. 3, 1989, 103 Stat. 825, related to reports to Congress on operations.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 550 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 256
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 550

                          [Report No. 106-732]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2000

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of July 17, 2000, providing 
for consideration or disposition of any Senate amendments to the bill 
(H.R. 4180) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 103(a)(1) 
of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2001.

                                                 House Calendar No. 256

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 550

                          [Report No. 106-732]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 13, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
42

624,

“py uojeisg = dwng

SES

06

03

I
! /
19 i 20 2
i} |
i} \
| |
| |
ns ee
| |
i |
| |
30 i 29 28
i} |
| |
! |
i |
Senn 5 Seen Sanaa |

|
\
\
22 \
\
\
\
|
ina ~
I
|
|
|
27
|
|
I
= ----- >
|
\
\ \
34 |
\
|

T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

02 01
ees oe P---------
|
|
|
|
| 12
|
|
|
! mek
Avra Valley Rd.
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
—-p-----,---
|
;
23 24
| \
\
|
|
a d oe
|
|
|
|
26 | 25
|
|
|
|
ce er ae joes nao te
36

\35

TRAVEL MANAGEMENT

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft Resource Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
March 2007

TRAVEL ROUTE INVENTORY

Township 12 South
Range 10 East

Gila and Salt River Principal Meridian, Arizona

24 National Monument Boundary

Public Lands Administered by the
Bureau of Land Management

State Trust Lands

Military Reservation

—— Monument Travel Route Inventory

Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheriod

NAD27 Datum

A

i} 1 Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
for the use of this map for purposes not intended by the BLM, or
to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information
shown. Spatial information may not meet National map Accuracy
Standards. This information may be updated without notification.

United States Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Management

Tucson Field Office

Arizona

S
# C_2006326EN.01002701.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/27

---

Action brought on 11 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-416/06)

(2006/C 326/54)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Shotter and K. Mojzesowicz, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not ensuring actual availability of at least one comprehensive directory and one comprehensive directory enquiry service in accordance with the requirements set out in Article 5(1) and (2) and Article 25(1) and (3) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (1), the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not ensuring actual availability of at least one comprehensive directory and one comprehensive directory enquiry service in accordance with the requirements set out in Article 5(1) and (2) and Article 25(1) and (3) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (1), the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2002/22 expired on 30 June 2004.

---

(1)  OJ No L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 51.

1

---
Exhibit 15.2







Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



JX Luxventure Ltd



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated May 17, 2021, relating to the audit of the consolidated financial statements
of JX Luxventure Ltd, formerly known as KBS Fashion Group Limited (the “Company”), for the years ended December 31, 2020 and
December 31, 2019 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements), appearing
in this Annual Report the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2022, as filed with the United States Securities Exchange
Commission (“SEC”).



|                      | /s/ WWC, P.C.               
|--------------------- | ----------------------------
|San Mateo, California | WWC, P.C.                   
|May 12, 2023          | Certified Public Accountants
|                      | PCAOB ID: 1171
#### §§ 457.112-457.129 [Reserved]
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

83-18 

August 5, 1983 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4203 Complete Withdrawal

4218(1)(A) Withdrawal - Change of Business Structure 

OPINION: 

 This responds to your request for the opinion of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation concerning the

application of Sections 4203 and 4218 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § § 1383

and 1398. Specifically you wish to know whether the incorporation of a sole proprietorship constitutes a withdrawal

from a multiemployer pension plan where the successor corporate employer continues to contribute to the plan on behalf

of its employees for the same operations for which contributions were previously contributed by the sole proprietor. We

conclude that a withdrawal does not occur under such circumstances where there is a substantial identity between the

predecessor and the successor employer. 

Under Section 4203 a contributing employer withdraws from a multiemployer plan if it (1) permanently ceases to

have an obligation to contribute under the plan, or (2) permanently ceases all covered operations under the plan. 

Section 4218, however, provides that -- 

Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, an employer shall not be considered to have withdrawn from a plan

solely [*2] because - 

(1) an employer ceases to exist by reason of - 

(A) a change in corporate structure described in section 4062(d), or 

(B) a change to an unincorporated form of business enterprise, 

if the change causes no interruption in employer contributions or obligations to contribute under the plan . . . . 

 Section 4062(d) which is referred to in Section 4218, provides in paragraph (1) -- 

If an employer ceases to exist by reason of a reorganization which involves a mere change in identity, form, or place

of organization, however effected, a successor corporation resulting from such reorganization shall be treated as the

employer to whom this section applies. 

It is our view that when there is no interruption in employer contributions or the obligation to contribute,

incorporation of a previously unincorporated employer (e.g., a sole proprietorship or a partnership) may constitute a

covered reorganization if there is substantial identity between the predecessor and the successor employers. But see

Section 4212(c) of ERISA. A dispute over such a determination regarding the occurrence of a withdrawal would be

subject to the arbitration provision of Title IV. 

I hope this has been [*3] of assistance. If you have further questions on this matter, please contact * * * of my staff

at this address or (202) 254-4873. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CFO CERTIFICATION**

 

                Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted),Thomas M.Donnelly, the Chief Financial Officer of Digital River, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.     TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company forthe periods presented therein.

 

                **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned has set his hand heretoas of the 9th day of November 2005.

 
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Thomas M. Donnelly  |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |                    |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Thomas M. Donnelly      |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DigitalRiver, Inc. and will be retained by Digital River, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 679 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 679

 Providing for a committee of two Members to be appointed by the House 
                        to inform the President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2000

 Mr. McCollum submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for a committee of two Members to be appointed by the House 
                        to inform the President.

    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the House 
to join a similar committee appointed by the Senate, to wait upon the 
President of the United States and inform him that the two Houses have 
completed their business of the session and are ready to adjourn, 
unless the President has some other communication to make to them.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.10 How does an Indian tribe or tribal organization secure a list of all Federal property currently in use in carrying out the programs, functions, services, or activities that benefit the Indian tribe or tribal organization to assist in negotiating a contract?

The Indian tribe or tribal organization submits a written request to the Secretary. The Secretary shall provide the requested information, including the condition of the property, within 60 days.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Inherited Disease Research Access 
Committee.
    Date: March 15, 2011.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call.)
    Contact Person: Ken D. Nakamura, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 
9306, Rockville, MD 20852. 301-402-0838.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4304 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services,a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*

* *
### Part E—Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation
National Flood Insurance Program

Your Homeowners 

Insurance Does 

Not Cover Floods...
...but Federal flood insurance does.

Floods can happen anytime, anywhere.

They cause physical, emotional, and financial 

anguish—especially when victims realize the 

damage is not covered by their homeowners 

insurance policy.

Federal disaster assistance 

is not the answer.

Why? In most cases, the only aid disaster 

victims may qualify for is a loan, and that 

must be repaid—with interest!

Only Federal flood insurance reimburses 

you for flood damage to your property.

With one annual premium, you can protect 

your most important investment: your home or 

business and its contents.

Call your insurance agent or company today to 

ask about the National Flood Insurance Program. 

There is no better way to save for a rainy day.

(Revised 4/11; Reprinted 11/12)

For more information about the 

NFIP and flood insurance, call 

1-800-427-4661 

or contact your 

insurance company or agent.

For an agent referral, call 

1-888-435-6637

TDD 1-800-427-5593

www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program

www.floodsmart.gov

F-061
§ 502.17 Person having a direct or indirect financial interest in a management contract. *Person having a direct or indirect financial interest in a management contract* means: ( a ) When a person is a party to a management contract, any person having a direct financial interest in such management contract;
( b ) When a trust is a party to a management contract, any beneficiary or trustee;
( c ) When a partnership is a party to a management contract, any partner;
( d ) When a corporation is a party to a management contract, any person who is a director or who holds at least 5% of the issued and outstanding stock alone or in combination with another stockholder who is a spouse, parent, child or sibling when the corporation is publicly traded or the top ten (10) shareholders for a privately held corporation;
( e ) When an entity other than a natural person has an interest in a trust, partnership or corporation that has an interest in a management contract, all parties of that entity are deemed to be persons having a direct financial interest in a management contract; or
( f ) Any person or entity who will receive a portion of the direct or indirect interest of any person or entity listed above through attribution, grant, pledge, or gift.
[74 FR 36932, July 27, 2009]
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lil Marc, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith M.
Rosenbloom, principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

August 13, 2002


                                           /s/ Keith M. Rosenbloom
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Keith M. Rosenbloom
                                        President
# C_2006177EN.01003201.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/32

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4221 — Allianz Capital Partners/Man Roland)

(2006/C 177/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes; |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4221. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4221. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---