alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ANNIE BROWN v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 206PA89

(Filed 1 March 1990)

On defendant’s petition for discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 93 N.C. App. 431, 378 S.E.2d 232 (1989), which found no error in the judgment of *Morgan, J.,*at the 18 December 1987 Session of Superior Court, ROCKINGHAM County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 February 1990.

*Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy and Kennedy, by Harvey L. Kennedy, Harold L. Kennedy, III, and Annie Brown Kennedy, for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Smith Helms Mullís & Moore, by McNeill Smith, Michael A. Gilíes, and Julie C. Theall, for defendant-appellant.*

*Lonnie B. Williams, Immediate Past President; and Young, Moore, Henderson & Alvis, P.A., by Walter E. Brock, Jr., and E. Knox Proctor, for amicus curiae, North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys.*

*Anne M. Fishburne for amicus curiae NC Equity.*

*Smith, Patterson, Follín, Curtis, James, Harkavy & Lawrence, by Martha A. Greer and Heidi G. Chapman, for North Carolina Association of Women Attorneys; J. Wilson Parker, Wake Forest University School of Law, and Tharrington, Smith & Hargrove, by Wade M. Smith and Burton Craige, for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amici curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

Discretionary review improvidently allowed.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-30293

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Randy L. Randall, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:11-CR-317-8

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Randy L. Randall, federal prisoner # 15699-035, appeals the district 

court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate 

release. He contends that because the Government conceded in response to 

an earlier § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion that his allegations related to COVID-19 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 17, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-30293 Document: 00516548893 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2022
No. 22-30293

2

constituted an extraordinary and compelling circumstance, the district court 

could not consider the issue. In addition, Randall maintains that because his 

refusal to take the COVID-19 vaccine was based on a sincerely held religious 

belief, the district court’s reliance on his refusal to deny relief violated his 

First Amendment rights. Finally, Randall argues that the district court 

should have taken into account the Custody Classification Form created by 

the Bureau of Prisons in analyzing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and should 

not have given weight to his criminal history or his prison disciplinary record.

We review for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss, 948 

F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 2020). The district court conducted an 

independent review of the § 3553(a) factors and concluded that Randall was 

not entitled to relief. Randall has not shown that the district court abused its 

discretion in this conclusion. See id. at 693; see also Concepcion v. United 

States, 142 S. Ct 2389, 2404-05 (2022). Because the district court’s 

independent § 3553(a) analysis supports the dismissal, it is unnecessary to 

consider Randall’s arguments challenging the district court’s conclusion that 

he failed to show extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief. See

United States v. Jackson, 27 F.4th 1088, 1093 & n.8 (5th Cir. 2022); Ward v. 

United States, 11 F.4th 354, 360-62 (5th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, the 

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-30293 Document: 00516548893 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2022
§ 67.11 Decision of the Area Director on appeals. ( a ) The Area Director will consider the record as presented, together with such additional information as may be considered pertinent. Any additional information relied upon shall be specifically identified in the decision.
( b ) The decision of the Area Director on an appeal shall be final and conclusive, and written notice, which shall state that the decision is final and conclusive, shall be given to the individual applicant, parent, legal guardian, or sponsor, as applicable.
( c ) If an individual files an appeal on behalf of more than one applicant, one notice of the Area Director's decision may be addressed to the person who filed the appeal. The Area Director's decision must list the name of each person to whom the decision is applicable. Where an individual applicant is represented by a sponsor, notification to the sponsor of the Area Director's decision is sufficient.
( d ) Written notice of the Area Director's decision on the appeal shall be sent to the applicant by certified mail, to be received by the addressee only, return receipt requested. ( 1 ) On the basis of the individual's election with regard to whether he or she wishes to share in the per capita payment, the Area Director's decision shall also state whether the individual's name will be included on the per capita payment roll. If no election is made by the individual applicant, parent, or legal guardian, the individual's name will not be included on the per capita payment roll.
( 2 ) The eligible individual will have 30 days from notification of his or her eligibility in which to request a change in the election of whether to share in the per capita payment. Computation of the 30-day period will be in accordance with § 67.9(a)(2) and § 67.9(d). Upon written request received within the 30-day period, to avoid hardship or gross injustice, the Area Director may grant additional time, not to exceed 30 days, in which to submit a request for a change in election.
( 3 ) The change in the election of whether to share in the per capita payment can only be made by adult applicants, or by the legal guardian of an incompetent adult, or in the case of minors, by the parents or legal guardian of such minors.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2011-OS-0017]


Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
March 31, 2011 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by dock number and/RIN 
number and title, by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, Mailroom 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this 
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other 
submissions from members of the public is of make these submissions 
available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any 
personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045, or 
Chief Privacy and FOIA Officer, Headquarters Defense Logistics Agency, 
Attn: DGA, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, VA 
22060-6221.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT address above.
    The specific changes to the record system being amended are set 
forth below followed by the notice, as amended, published in its 
entirety. The proposed amendment is not within the purview of 
subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 
which requires the submission of new or altered systems reports.

    Dated: February 23, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

DELETION:
System Identifier and Name:
    S400.05, Official Personnel Files for Non-Appropriated Fund 
Employees January 22, 2009, 74 FR 3998.

Reason for Deletion:
    Non-appropriated fund employees are considered federal employees as 
defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105, and are therefore covered by the Office of 
Personnel Management government-wide Privacy Act systems of records.

[FR Doc. 2011-4433 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Alliance BioEnergy Plus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The
amended annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:
November 9, 2016



| | /s/
    Daniel de Liege                                                                                                   
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Daniel
    de Liege                                                                                                       
| | Chief
    Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ALLIANCE BIOENERGY PLUS, INC. and will
be retained by ALLIANCE BIOENERGY PLUS, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2006326EN.01005202.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/52

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-181/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 326/106)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 09.07.2005.

1

---
**Exhibit        32.2**

**Certification        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, **

**As        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of        2002**

| (1)   | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                     |                                                       |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                          |
|                          |                                |                                                  |
|                               |                                | /s/ John                  P.                  Mueller |
|                               | John                  P. Mueller         |
|   Date: November 7, 2008 | Chief                  Financial Officer |

----
#### Preston B. Ruland, Respondent, v. Warren S. Newbold, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Eich, JJ., concurred.
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

Map 3-2

Data Source:

Soils: Natural Resources Conservation Service - BLM Tucson Field Office 2006

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: US Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_3\Soils.pdf

Location in Arizona

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Sensitive and Fragile Soils

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

CAP Canal

River

General Reference

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Legend

Soils Highly Prone to Wind Erosion and Fugitive Dust

When Disturbed

(Ground disturbing activities may be 

prohibited or restricted, or special measures may be 

required to prevent or minimize the generation of 

fugitive dust.)

Soils

Surface Management

American Indian Reservation

Military Reservations

State Trust Lands

State, County, City; Wildlife, Park and Outdoor Recreation

Areas

Private

Bureau of Land Management

Pima County

National Park Service

Bureau of Reclamation
# C_2006281EN.01004301.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/43

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2006 — Izar Construcciones Navales v Commission

(Case T-381/03) (1)

1

(2006/C 281/76)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 21, 24.1.2004.

1

---
§ 36.32 Standard XII—Graduation requirements for a high school diploma. Graduation requirements contained under this section shall be applied beginning with the graduating class of the 1987-88 school year. ( a ) Satisfactory completion of a minimum number of units shall be the measure for the issuance of a high school diploma.
( b ) To graduate, a student shall earn 20 units in a four year high school program unless the state in which the school is located exceeds these requirements, in which case the state's requirements shall apply; fifteen (15) units shall be required as follows: ( 1 ) Language arts—four (4) units.
( 2 ) Mathematics—three (3) units.
( 3 ) Social studies—three (3) units. ( i ) One (1) unit in United States history;
( ii ) One-half (1 ⁄ 2) unit in civics/government;
( iii ) One-half (1 ⁄ 2) unit in tribal history/government;
( iv ) One-half (1 ⁄ 2) unit in Indian studies; and
( v ) One-half (1 ⁄ 2) unit in any other social studies;
( 4 ) Science—two (2) units. ( i ) One (1) unit in the general science area.
( ii ) One (1) unit in laboratory science areas, i.e., chemistry, physics, biology, zoology, laboratory anatomy.
( 5 ) Physical education—one (1) unit.
( 6 ) Practical arts—one (1) unit. Credit in any vocational course may also be used to satisfy this required unit.
( 7 ) Fine arts—one (1) unit. Music, art, dance, drama, theatre, and other fine arts courses may be used to satisfy this required unit. These are minimum requirements; local schools may establish academic or vocational requirements beyond those prescribed by these standards.
( c ) A school with an average enrollment of fewer than 75 students may offer subjects in alternate years. If schools use this pattern, alternating pairs of subjects shall be listed and approved by the Agency Superintendent for Education or Area Education Programs Administrator, as appropriate.
( d ) Credits earned through approved correspondence or extension study may be accepted if such credits are from schools approved or accredited by the state in which they are located or by a college or university which is regionally accredited for such purposes.
( e ) Students who successfully complete the requirements of the High School Proficiency Examination in the State in which the school is located shall receive an endorsement so stating on their diplomas.
### [§3345. Omitted]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1818(c), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4188, initially transferred section 2302e of this title to this section, to become effective Jan. 1, 2022. Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(v)(1)(A), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2154, repealed section 1818(c) of Pub. L. 116–283, effective as if included therein, which eliminated that transfer, thereby omitting this section before it took effect. Another amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 resulted in the transfer of section 2302e to section 4004 of this title.
(logo) pwc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the "Company"), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2014 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, TX 75201-2997

T: (214) 999 1400, F: (214)754 7991, www.pwc.com/us
# CA2007029EN.01000101.xml

| 9.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 29/1

---

Publication of a Vacancy for Executive Director of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in Helsinki (Grade AD 15)

(2007/C 29 A/01)

The REACH Regulation, which will enter into force on 1 June 2007, will establish a new regulatory framework for chemical substances in the European Union. At the heart of REACH is the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), to be set up in Helsinki, Finland. The ECHA will be responsible for managing technical, scientific and administrative aspects of REACH, and ensuring consistency in its application. It will provide the Member States and the EU institutions with the best possible scientific and technical advice on chemicals issues.

For the post of Executive Director, the Commission seeks candidates with the capacity to lead a major EU regulatory agency in its key early years and steer it through the scientific, technical and organisational challenges of establishing a complex regulatory process in a field that is politically sensitive and crucial to human health, the environment, economic competitiveness and innovation. Candidates should combine solid management experience with leadership in relevant scientific or technical fields.

The Executive Director will be appointed by the Management Board of the Agency from a list of candidates selected by the European Commission. He/she will be appointed as a member of the temporary staff at grade AD 15 pursuant to Article 2a of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities for a period of five years that may be extended once for a further period of up to five years.

For full information, you will find the vacancy notice and application form at the following addresses:

http://www.ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

and

http://www.ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach/prep_jobs_en.htm

The closing date for the submission of applications is 23 March 2007.

23 March 2007

---