alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June1, 2012, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and CertificateAdministrator, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor andDeutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-GCJ7 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 31.3


CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a)


AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED


I, Philippe Tartavull, certify that:


|   |                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xura, Inc.;

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial information included in this report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Date: May 31, 2016


/s/ Philippe TartavullPhilippe TartavullPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Appellate case name: In re Jeffrey Wayne Blackburn, Relator

Appellate case number: 01-19-00627-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-80112

Trial court: 113th District Court of Harris County

On August 20, 2019, relator, Jeffrey Wayne Blackburn, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge’s two orders issued on July 1, 2019, 

granting the plaintiffs Belinda Lamonto and Linda Bendickson’s motions to strike the 

counter-affidavits of Bradley K. Weiner, M.D. Although relator has included the required 

Rule 52.3(j) certification with the petition and two volumes of an appendix, there are no 

reporter’s records of any motion hearings, if any, or a statement that no testimony was 

adduced in connection with the matter complained. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2). 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the relator, within 3 days of the date of this order, to 

file a statement that no relevant testimony was adduced in connection with the matter 

complained of in this petition or else provide evidence of requesting the reporter’s records. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(2), (b).

With his petition, relator filed an “Motion for Emergency Stay” seeking to stay the 

trial setting for September 9, 2019, pending disposition of this petition. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.10(a). The Court denies the relator’s motion for emergency stay.

The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by any real party 

in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be filed within 20 

days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Laura C. Higley___

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __August 21, 2019____________________
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# PD-6(R)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLES956000-L14200000-BJ0000]


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey; Virginia.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States office in 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management-Eastern 
States, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: 
Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Land Management--Eastern States, Lower Potomac Field Office.
    The lands surveyed are:

Fairfax County, Virginia

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion 
of Meadowood Farm, West of Belmont Boulevard, in Fairfax County, in the 
State of Virginia, and was accepted September 27, 2010.
    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be available to the public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against the survey, as shown on the plat, 
prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: January 6, 2011.
Dominica Van Koten,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 2011-452 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
-  Home 

# In This Section

## Contact Us

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-4433****Fax:**202-366-3666**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# PHMSA NTSB Recommendations

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration is required by law to respond to safety recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating transportation incidents. Recommendations usually address a specific issue uncovered during an investigation or study and specify how to correct the situation.

## **Open Recommendations**

The NTSB classifications for open recommendations:

OAA - Open Acceptable ActionOAAR - Open Acceptable Alternate ResponseOUA - Open Unacceptable ResponseORR - Open Response ReceivedOAR - Open Await ResponseIRR - Initial Response Received

## Mode

A - AirH - HighwayP - PipelineR - Rail

## Currently Open Recommendations
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1051

AN ACT

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic Petroleum Reserve more effectively,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1051 ES

1 SECTION 1. Title I of the Energy Policy and Con2 servation Act (42 U.S.C. 6211–6251) is amended—

3 (a) In section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246), by insert4 ing ‘‘through 2003’’ after ‘‘1999’’.

5 (b) In section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251), by strik6 ing ‘‘1999’’ each place it appears and inserting

7 ‘‘2003’’.

8 SEC. 2. Title II of the Energy Policy and Conserva9 tion Act (42 U.S.C. 6261–6285) is amended—

10 (a) In section 256(h) (42 U.S.C. 6276(h)), by

11 inserting ‘‘through 2003’’ after ‘‘1997’’.

12 (b) In section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285), by strik13 ing ‘‘1999’’ each place it appears and inserting

14 ‘‘2003’’.

Passed the Senate September 29, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1051

AN ACT

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act

to manage the Strategic Petroleum Reserve moreeffectively, and for other purposes.
English Translation of Loan Agreement



 Exhibit 10.23 
 English Translation 
 LOAN AGREEMENT 
 Party A: Zhejiang Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. 
 Party B: Zhejiang
Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. 
 Whereas, this Loan Agreement is entered into by and between
Party A and Party B on this 30th day, October, 2006 with a total amount of RMB 10,000,000.00 (Renminbi Ten Million Yuan only), with the following
terms and conditions: 
 Party A shall advance the first installment of loan, in sum of RMB Five Million Yuan, without interest to Party B on October 30,
2006, and the term of this loan shall be two (2) months and it shall be due on December 30, 2006; 
 Party A shall advance the second installment
of loan, in sum of RMB Five Million Yuan, with monthly interest rate of 0.6%, to Party B on November 13, 2006, and the term of this loan shall be one (1) year. Party B shall repay the principal of this loan and pay the interest thereof on
the due date (unless Party A agrees to extend the term of this loan). If Party A demands Party B to repay this loan before the due date, Party B shall do so unconditionally. 
 If case of any doubt or dispute, it shall be settled by both parties through negotiations. This Agreement shall be made and executed in two (2) counterparts, one for each party hereto. 
 Party A: Zhejiang Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. (Seal) 
 Party B:
Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. (Seal) 
 Date: October 30, 2006
# C_2006248EN.01002601.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/26

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4357 — Bridgepoint/Dorna)

(2006/C 248/16)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 October 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4357. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4357. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1419

MYRON J. BRYANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PROFESSIONAL RECOVERY CONSULTANTS, Defendant - Appellee, and STEVE MILLER, Owner; JEFF IVIE, Operations Manager, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-654-5-BO(3), CA-00-273-5-BO(3)) Submitted: September 28, 2001 Decided: October 16, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.David G. Schiller, SCHILLER LAW FIRM, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Joy R. Webb, BROWNE, FLEBOTTE, WILSON & HORN, P.L.L.C., Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Myron J. Bryant appeals the district court’s order granting Professional Recovery Consultants’ motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We affirm. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. , 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no material facts in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). This court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986).We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the materials submitted in the joint appendices, and fully considered the arguments raised on appeal. Finding no reversible error, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bryant v. Professional Recovery Consultants, Inc. , Nos. CA-99-654-5-BO(3); CA-00-273-5-BO(3) (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Jto; eas@dot.gov _ _ 

;...:..„ . 1... D.0X:.o SL:..CaiS - O'S ^ ^ 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service 

OST-2008-0217 

Dear DOT, 

I live in Kake and have been pleased with the service provided by Wings 

of Alaska. Wings has worked with the community to provide efficient 

and comfortable year-round service to our community. Wings caravan 

service is much needed by providing the ability to carry 3,000 pounds of 

payload, meaning they can get 9 passengers and all their baggage on the 

flight. This is important as our services are limited and getting our 

baggage, cargo, and mail is essential to our community. Weather has 

always been a challenge and it's reassuring to know that Wings of 

Alaska has the Medallion Shield, earned by operating well above safety 

standards set by the State. 

Please reselect Wings of Alaska to serve Kake for the next 2 years! 

Thank You 

Pamela Jo Lopez 

P.O. Box 214 

Kake, Alaska 99830 

907-518-4146
#### § 167.5 Land management districts.

The Commissioner of Indian Affairs has established and will retain the present land management districts within the Navajo Indian Reservation, based on the social and economic requirements of the Navajo Indians and the necessity of rehabilitating the grazing lands. District boundary changes may be made when deemed necessary and advisable by the District Grazing Committees, Central Grazing Committee and Tribal Council, with approval by the Superintendent, Area Director, and the Commissioner of Indian Affairs.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Carl E. Vogel, the Chief Executive Officer of Renaissance Media Group
LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and
Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (collectively, the Company) in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Carl E. VogelCarl E. VogelChief Executive OfficerNovember 12, 2004
§ 514.3 What is the maximum fee rate? ( a ) The rates of fees imposed shall be— ( 1 ) No more than 2.5% of the first $1,500,000 of the assessable gross revenues from each gaming operation; and
( 2 ) No more than 5% of amounts in excess of the first $1,500,000 of the assessable gross revenues from each gaming operation.
( b ) If a tribe has a certificate of self-regulation, the rate of fees imposed on assessable gross revenues from the class II gaming activity shall be no more than 0.25%.
( c ) The total amount of all fees imposed on assessable gross revenues during any fiscal year shall not exceed 0.08% of the assessable gross gaming revenues of all gaming operations.
- Front Cover
- Inside Cover
- Specially Adapted Housing
- Table of Contents
- 1 - Introduction
1.1 Wheelchair Dimensions
1.2 Anthropometrics

- 2 - Site Considerations
2.1 Site Considerations
2.2 Walks and Ramps
2.3 Handrails
2.4 Entrances
2.5 Garages

- 3 - Floor Plans
3.1 General Considerations
3.2 Bedrooms

- 4 - Interior Detail
4.1 Door Operation
4.2 Doors
4.3 Windows
4.4 Wall Switches
4.5 Corridors
4.6 Closets
4.7 Stairs

- 5 - Bathrooms
5.1 Bathroom Arrangements
5.2 Bathroom Fixtures
5.3 Transfer Sequences
5.4 Bathtubs
5.5 Showers

- 6 - Kitchens
6.1 Kitchen Arrangements
6.2 Work Areas
6.3 Kitchen Sinks
6.4 Ovens

- 7 - Safety Considerations
7.1 Safety Considerations

- Metric Conversions
- Index
- Back Cover
# C_2006178EN.01004102.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/41

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 14 June 2006 — Lebedef and Others v Commission

(Case F-34/05) (1)

1

(Work environment - Language of computer tools made available to Commission staff - Inadmissibility - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Act adversely affecting an official - Internal organisation measures)

(2006/C 178/77)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Giorgio Lebedef (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Armand Imbert (Brussels, Belgium), Jean-Marie Rousseau (Brussels, Belgium) and Maria Rosario Domenech Cobo (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and P. Costa de Oliveira, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the Commission of the European Communities rejecting the applicants' request to have computer tools made available to them in their mother tongue or in another official language of the European Union of their choice and not only in English.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Each of the parties shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each of the parties shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 193 of 6.8.2005 (Case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-204/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.226 What rules govern appeals of cost disallowances?

In any appeal involving a disallowance of costs, the Board of Contract Appeals will give due consideration to the factual circumstances giving rise to the disallowed costs, and shall seek to determine a fair result without rigid adherence to strict accounting principles. The determination of allowability shall assure fair compensation for the work or service performed, using cost and accounting data as guides, but not rigid measures, for ascertaining fair compensation.
Second Amendment to the Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.



 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 MEDICAL STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC. 
 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

 WHEREAS, Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) currently maintains and sponsors the Medical
Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, Section 15(a) of
the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend the Plan at any time; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board has determined it to be in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan as hereinafter set forth. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority reserved to the Board, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Effective as of the date of approval by the Company’s shareholders owning a majority of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $.01 per share, Section 4(a)
is amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 

  

	 	a)	“Share Reserve. Subject to Section 9 hereof relating to adjustments, the total number of shares of Stock which may be granted pursuant to Awards hereunder shall not
exceed, in the aggregate, 3,274,499 shares of Stock”. 

  

	 	2.	Except as modified by this Second Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain valid and in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Company, has executed
this instrument as of the 3rd day of June 2008, on behalf of the Board. 
  

			
	MEDICAL STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin S. Little

		 	Kevin S. Little
		 	President and Chief Financial Officer