alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 94

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 8, 1999.

Whereas kidneys are vital organs that clean the blood by removing wastes, and failed kidneys have lost the ability to

remove these wastes;

Whereas in the United States more than 250,000 patients

with kidney failure, also known as end stage renal disease

(ESRD), have died since 1989;

Whereas during 1996, 283,932 patients were in treatment for

ESRD, and an additional 73,091 patients began treatment for ESRD;

Whereas the most common cause of ESRD has consistently

been diabetes, because the high levels of blood sugar in

persons with diabetes cause the kidneys to filter too

much blood and leave the kidneys, over time, unable to

filter waste products;

Whereas of the patients who began treatment for ESRD in

1996, 43 percent were persons with diabetes;

Whereas ESRD can be treated with dialysis, which artificially

cleans the blood but which imposes significant burdens on

quality of life, or with a successful kidney transplant operation, which frees the patient from dialysis and brings

about a dramatic improvement in quality of life;
2

•HRES 94 EH

Whereas in 1996 the number of kidneys transplanted in the

United States was 12,238, with 25 percent of the kidneys

donated from biologically related living relatives, 5 percent from spousal or other biologically unrelated living

persons, and the remainder from cadavers;

Whereas from 1988 to 1997, the number of patients on the

waiting list for a cadaveric kidney transplant increased

more than 150 percent, from 13,943 to more than

35,000;

Whereas the annual number of cadaveric kidneys available for

transplant has increased only slightly, from 8,327 in

1994 to 8,526 in 1996, an increase of less than 100 such

kidneys per year;

Whereas from 1988 to 1997, the annual number of kidneys

donated by living persons rose 104 percent, from 1,812

to 3,705; and

Whereas in 1995, the 3-year survival rate for kidney recipients was 82 percent if the donor was a living parent, 85

percent if the donor was a living spouse, 81 percent if the

donor was a biologically unrelated living person other

than a spouse, and 70 percent if the kidney was

cadaveric: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the generous contribution made by

each living person who has donated a kidney to save a

life; and

(2) acknowledges the advances in medical technology that have enabled living kidney transplantation to
3

•HRES 94 EH

become a viable treatment option for an increasing number of patients with end stage renal disease.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 81.9 Will the Secretary give deference to the Tribe's interpretation of its own documents?

The Secretary will give deference to the tribe's reasonable interpretation of the amendment and adoption articles of the tribe's governing documents. The Secretary retains authority, however, to interpret tribal law when necessary to carry out the government-to-government relationship with the tribe or when a provision, result, or interpretation may be contrary to Federal law.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

75-1 

 April 15, 1975 

 

 OPINION: 

Dear Mr. :

 The purpose of this letter is to confirm the matters discussed in your telephone conversation of April 9 with * * * of

our General Counsel's Office. In that conversation you questioned whether information submitted to the Pension

Benefit Guaranty Corporation in support of your client's request for waiver of employer liability pursuant to §

4004(f)(4) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 would be subject to public disclosure. 

 Under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), this Corporation can only withhold from public disclosure

those matters that are specifically protected from disclosure by subsection (b) of §552. Among those matters are

"trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and priviledged or confidential" 

(§ 552(b)(4)). In order to assist the Corporation in applying this provision in the instant case, you should indicate in

your submission to us the commercial and financial information that is in fact confidential. You may also indicate

other information in your submission that you would like to be kept confidential, but keep in mind that the

Corporation cannot guarantee confidential treatment of such other information. 

 You also requested that the Corporation notify you, prior to our response, of any request for disclosure of the

information submitted to us pertaining to this matter. Recognizing your concern over the dissemination of this

information, we will notify you, by telephone, of any such request. 

 Steven E. Schanes 

 Acting Executive Director
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the registrant.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005                  
|                                      
|/s/    JOHN J. LEGERE                 
|John J. Legere Chief Executive Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ELIZABETH SCHWARTZ,

Appellant,

v.

GARY SCHWARTZ,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D20-0057 and 4D20-0369

[February 25, 2021]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Schosberg Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 502019MH002386XXXXSB and 502019GA000443XXXXSB.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Gary Schwartz, Pembroke Pines, pro se appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §742. Effect of section 362 of this title in this subchapter

Notwithstanding section 362 of this title, SIPC may file an application for a protective decree under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970. The filing of such application stays all proceedings in the case under this title unless and until such application is dismissed. If SIPC completes the liquidation of the debtor, then the court shall dismiss the case.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2613; Pub. L. 97–222, §9, July 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 237; Pub. L. 103–394, title V, §501(d)(26), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4146.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

Section 742 of the House amendment deletes a sentence contained in the Senate amendment requiring the trustee in an interstate stock-brokerage liquidation to comply with the provisions of subchapter IV of chapter 7 if the debtor is also a commodity broker. The House amendment expands the requirement to require the SIPC trustee to perform such duties, if the debtor is a commodity broker, under section 7(b) of the Securities Investor Protection Act [15 U.S.C. 78ggg(b)]. The requirement is deleted from section 742 since the trustee of an intrastate stockbroker will be bound by the provisions of subchapter IV of chapter 7 if the debtor is also a commodity broker by reason of section 103 of title 11.

#### senate report no. 95–989

Section 742 indicates that the automatic stay does not prevent SIPC from filing an application for a protective decree under SIPA. If SIPA does file such an application, then all bankruptcy proceedings are suspended until the SIPC action is completed. If SIPC completes liquidation of the stockbroker then the bankruptcy case is dismissed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–598, Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1636, which is classified generally to chapter 2B–1 (§78aaa et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 78aaa of Title 15 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–394 struck out "(15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.)" after "Act of 1970".

1982—Pub. L. 97–222 substituted "title" for "chapter" after "all proceedings in the case under this".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Diarllo Renford, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 731]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph S. Forma, J.), rendered October 28, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
§ 162.589 May BIA investigate compliance with a WSR lease? ( a ) We may enter the leased premises at any reasonable time, upon reasonable notice, and consistent with any notice requirements under applicable tribal law and applicable lease documents, to protect the interests of the Indian landowners and to determine if the lessee is in compliance with the requirements of the lease.
( b ) If an Indian landowner notifies us that a specific lease violation has occurred, we will promptly initiate an appropriate investigation.
62211
; 62212 2
| 7 sa
06 Zr | 05 02
| J
| 622J1
Nie sia ean POR crs
| 6215:
. 2
2 ou" /
07 ee 08 41924
|
q H |
| tronwood Forest National Monument | a
Libs : ” Lien | | FINN le Co
5 oe
aS)
| |
| _ fe ta ©
| to
| | /
= ae es 622C \
NXg 6228
e e-
be <
231 2A.
Avra Valley Rd.

TRAVEL MANAGEMENT

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft Resource Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
March 2007

Powerline

Monument Boundat

1 i}

TRAVEL ROUTE INVENTORY

Township 12 South
Range 9 East

Gila and Salt River Principal Meridian, Arizona

National Monument Boundary

Public Lands Administered by the
Bureau of Land Management

State Trust Lands

Military Reservation

Pima County Land

Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheriod

NAD27 Datum

1 Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
for the use of this map for purposes not intended by the BLM, or
to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information
shown. Spatial information may not meet National map Accuracy
Standards. This information may be updated without notification.

United States Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Management

Tucson Field Office

Arizona

S
# C_2007056EN.01001102.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-204/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 78/686/EEC - Mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications - Practitioners of dentistry - Measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2007/C 56/19)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Walkerová and H. Støvlbæk, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: T. Boček, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have transposed, within the prescribed period, Council Directive 78/686/EEC of 25 July 1978 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of the formal qualifications of practitioners of dentistry, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services (OJ 1978 L 233, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| (1) | Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 78/686/EEC of 25 July 1978 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of the formal qualifications of practitioners of dentistry, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 24 of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 78/686/EEC of 25 July 1978 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of the formal qualifications of practitioners of dentistry, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 24 of that directive.

| (2) | Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Manchester United plc (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
30 June 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward Woodward, Executive Vice Chairman of the Company and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Date:
15 October 2015

By:

/s/ EDWARD WOODWARD Edward Woodward Executive Vice Chairman
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
### §3223. Director: review of cost estimates, cost analyses, and records of the military departments and Defense Agencies

The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation—

(1) promptly receives the results of all cost estimates and cost analyses conducted by the military departments and Defense Agencies, and all studies conducted by the military departments and Defense Agencies in connection with such cost estimates and cost analyses, for major defense acquisition programs and major subprograms of the military departments and Defense Agencies; and

(2) has timely access to any records and data in the Department of Defense (including the records and data of each military department and Defense Agency and including classified and proprietary information) that the Director considers necessary to review in order to carry out any duties under this chapter.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1812(a), (d), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4174, 4175; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(c)(2), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2136.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (c) of section 2334 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1812(d), was based on Pub. L. 111–23, title I, §101(b)(1), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1706; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, §842(a)(3), (b)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2288, 2289.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3223, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 176, related to authorized strength of Army Reserve in warrant officers, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §§1662(a)(3), 1691, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2988, 3026, effective Dec. 1, 1994. See section 12008 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1812(d), transferred subsec. (c) of section 2334 of this title to this section and struck out subsec. (c) designation and heading "Review of Cost Estimates, Cost Analyses, and Records of the Military Departments and Defense Agencies" at beginning.

Par. (2). Pub. L. 117–81 substituted "under this chapter" for "under this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 to take effect immediately after the amendments made by title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 have taken effect, see section 1701(a)(3) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and Effective Date note below.

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Section 1350 Certifications



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Actuate Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   May 6, 2004



/s/    PETER I. CITTADINI

---

Peter I.
Cittadini

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal
Executive Officer)





/s/    DANIEL A. GAUDREAU

---

Daniel A. Gaudreau

Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 99.7




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Crescent Point Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory T. Tisdale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:           March 11, 2015                                               CRESCENT POINT ENERGY CORP.




/s/ Gregory T. Tisdale


Name:  Gregory T. Tisdale


Title:    Chief Financial Officer
#### SUDLER LAKEWOOD LAND, L.L.C., AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO C.P. LAKEWOOD LAND, L.P.,1 PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LAKEWOOD TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued January 10, 2001

Decided January 31, 2001.

Before Judges KEEFE and STEINBERG.

*Anthony M(incuso,*argued the cause for appellant *(Starkey, Kelly, Blarney & White,*attorneys; *Mr. Mancmo,*of counsel and on the brief).

*Bruce H. Snyder,*argued the cause for respondent *(Lasser Hochvtwn, L.L.C.,*attorneys; *Mr. Snyder,*on the brief).

1

 The appeal was filed in the name of C.P. Lakewood Land, L P. However, the parties agree that Sudler Lakewood Land, L.L.C., is the successor in the interest to C.P. Lakewood Land, L.P. Accordingly, consistent with the determination of the Tax Court, we amend the caption to reflect that change.

PER CURIAM.

Lakewood Township appeals from a determination of the Tax Court, after trial, that the taxpayer, Sudler Lakewood Land, L.L.C., (the taxpayer) is entitled to a farmland assessment on two lots owned by it. The issues raised on appeal are that the trial court erred in finding that the taxpayer met the income requirements of the Farmland Assessment Act, and also erred in concluding that the taxpayer’s activity on the property was not prohibited by Lakewood’s zoning ordinances.

Initially, we note that factual determinations made by a trial judge are considered binding on appeal if they are supported by *306adequate, substantial and credible evidence. *Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co. of America,*65 *N.J.*474, 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974). We may not disturb the factual findings of the trial judge “unless we are convinced that they are manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant and reasonably credible evidence as to offend the interests of justice.” *Ibid.*In that context, we have reviewed the record in its entirety and conclude that the Tax Court’s judge's findings of fact are amply supported by substantial evidence in the record, giving due deference to the judge’s ability'to determine the credibility of the witnesses. Accordingly, we accept them.

Having accepted the factual determinations of the judge, we have carefully considered the record, the arguments of counsel, the briefs filed, and the applicable law and conclude that the legal arguments made are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in ,a written opinion. We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Francine I. Axelrad in her well-reasoned opinion which is published at 18 *N.J.Tax*451 (1999).

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOS International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allan J. Ligi, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\
|---

|Allan J. Ligi
|-------------

|Allan J. LigiPresident and Principal Executive Officer
|------------------------------------------------------

|February 17, 2006
|-----------------

---