alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 605 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 24, 2000.
Whereas communities should implement an emergency alert plan such as the Amber 
        Plan to expedite the recovery of abducted children;
Whereas the Amber Plan, a partnership between law enforcement agencies and media 
        officials, assists law enforcement, parents, and local communities to 
        respond immediately to the most serious child abduction cases;
Whereas the Amber Plan was created in 1996 in memory of 9-year-old Amber 
        Hagerman who was kidnapped and murdered in Arlington, Texas;
Whereas in response to community concern, the Association of Radio Managers with 
        the assistance of area law enforcement in Arlington, Texas, created the 
        Amber Plan;
Whereas, to date, the Amber Plan is credited with saving the lives of at least 9 
        children nationwide;
Whereas the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children endorses the 
        Amber Plan and is promoting the use of such emergency alert plans 
        nationwide;
Whereas the Amber Plan is responsible for reuniting children with their 
        searching parents: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that Amber 
Plan is a powerful tool in fighting child abductions and should be used across 
the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### §927. Limitation on recourse

The holder of a claim payable solely from special revenues of the debtor under applicable nonbankruptcy law shall not be treated as having recourse against the debtor on account of such claim pursuant to section 1111(b) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 100–597, §7(2), Nov. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 3029.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 927 was renumbered section 930 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 3, 1988, but not applicable to any case commenced under this title before that date, see section 12 of Pub. L. 100–597, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
-  Home 
-  171 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 171.24

## Section §171.24: Additional requirements for the use of the ICAO Technical Instructions

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 171.24 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

11 a.m., Friday March 25, 2011.

# PLACE: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2011-4681 Filed 2-25-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
### [§2223a. Renumbered §4571]
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.53 What kind of records shall the property management system maintain?

The property management system shall maintain records that accurately describe the property, including any serial number or other identification number. These records should contain information such as the source, titleholder, acquisition date, cost, share of Federal participation in the cost, location, use and condition of the property, and the date of disposal and sale price, if any.
§ 7.28 Automatic declassification. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section and paragraphs 3.3(b)-(d) and (g)-(j) of Executive Order 13526, all classified information contained in records that are more than 25 years old that have been determined to have permanent historical value shall be declassified automatically on December 31st of the year that is 25 years from the date of origin.
( b ) At least one year before information is declassified automatically under this section, the Chief Security Officer shall notify the ISOO of any specific information that DHS proposes to exempt from automatic declassification. The notification shall include: ( 1 ) A description of the information;
( 2 ) An explanation of why the information is exempt from automatic declassification and must remain classified for a longer period of time; and
( 3 ) A specific date or event for declassification of the information whenever the information exempted does not identify a confidential human source or human intelligence source, or, key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction.
( c ) Proposed exemptions under this section shall be forwarded to the Chief Security Officer. When the Chief Security Officer determines the exemption request is consistent with this section, he or she will submit the exemption request to the Executive Secretary of the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) for approval.
( d ) Declassification guides that narrowly and precisely define exempted information may be used to exempt information from automatic declassification. Declassification guides must include the exemption notification information detailed in paragraph (b) of this section, and be approved pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section. The creation of declassification guides to cite proposed or ISCAP-approved DHS exemptions shall be coordinated through and processed by the Office of the Chief Security Officer, Administrative Security Division.
#### § 1.6 Special procedure: Medical records. [Reserved]
#### STATE v. RAMBO

No. 246P90

Case below: 98 N.C.App. 516

Petition by defendant for writ of supersedeas and temporary stay denied 13 June 1990. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.
Exhibit 10-01




Agreement Between




Legacy Wine & Spirits International Ltd, a Nevada Corporation

with offices located at 385 52 Ave,

Pointe-Calumet, Quebec




“LI”

And




Legacy Wine & Spirits Merchants Ltd, a BVI Corporation

with offices located at Shop 7 G/F 38-48 Wharf Road,

North Point, Hong Kong




“LM”




LI will issue to LM 1,000,000 shares of LI’ s Company stock, under Rule 144, in consideration of LM’s vend-in of a general license to import, bottle, blend, manufacture and distribute wine and spirits ending in December 2021 (as detailed in the Joint Venture Agreement with Beijing Nine Dragons Winery Development Co. Ltd.)




LI represents that it is a publicly traded US listed and reporting Company  with the funding ability and marketing expertise to take advantage of a general license to import, , blend, manufacture and distribute wine and spirits in China.




LI agrees to finance at least 2 corporately owned wine and spirits retail stores to be located in Beijing, China.  These stores are to be named Legacy Wine & Spirits.




LI has the right to finance and ‘ First Right of Refusal’ (as detailed in Joint Venture Agreement) the capital costs of setting up the manufacturing facility so that bottling, blending and manufacturing of various wine and spirits products can be implemented after a reasonable period of marketing its imported products to the satisfaction of both LI and LM.

  



LM represents that it has the ability to source and import wine and spirits through its agreement with Crown Star Holdings Inc, a company with offices in Vancouver and Hong Kong, (as detailed in Crown Star Distributor Agreement).  LI reserves the right to deal with other sourcing companies as well.




LM will be responsible for the main sourcing of products (wine and Spirits) for import into China.




LM represents that it has a general license to import, bottle, blend, manufacture and distribute wine and spirits in China through its agreement with Nine Dragons Winery Development Co. Ltd, a company based in Beijing.




LM will be responsible for the operations of the Wine and Spirits stores and it’s distribution network.




LM will be responsible for increasing the distribution network for the Legacy product line.




LM and LI will be jointly responsible for the franchising of its wine and spirits stores and distribution network.







/s/: R. Klein_________________________________

Legacy Wine & Spirits International Ltd        Dated this 5th day of May, 2008







/s/: M. Liu___________________________________

Legacy Wine & Spirits Merchants Ltd            Dated this 5th day of May, 2008
### §214. Definitions

(a) As used in this subchapter and section 321 of this title the term "State bank" means any bank, banking association, trust company, savings bank (other than a mutual savings bank), or other banking institution which is engaged in the business of receiving deposits and which is incorporated under the laws of any State, any Territory of the United States, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands, or which is operating under the Code of Law for the District of Columbia.

(b) For purposes of merger or consolidation under this subchapter and section 321 of this title the term "national banking association" means one or more national banking associations, and the term "State bank" means one or more State banks.

(Aug. 17, 1950, ch. 729, §1, 64 Stat. 455; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §24, 68 Stat. 1234; Pub. L. 109–351, title VII, §725(f), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 2002; Pub. L. 109–356, title I, §123(f), Oct. 16, 2006, 120 Stat. 2029.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–351 and 109–356 amended subsec. (a) identically, striking out "(except a national banking association)" before period at end.

1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, substituted "this subchapter and section 321 of this title" for "sections 214 to 214c, 264(e)(2), (i)(2), (v)(4), and 321 of this title" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Separability

Act Aug. 17, 1950, ch. 729, §9, 64 Stat. 458, provided that: "If any provision of this Act [enacting this subchapter and amending of sections 264 and 321 of this title], or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of the Act and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby."
**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION**

**OF**

**RIVER HOLDING CORP**

Pursuant to Section 242of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

The undersigned, pursuant to the provisions of the General Corporation Law ofthe State of Delaware, does hereby certify and set forth as follows:

**FIRST:**            The name of the corporation is River Holding Corp. (the “Company”).

**SECOND:**     The amendment to the Certificate of Designation to be effected hereby is as follows:

The second sentence of section (a) of the Certificate of Designation of the Company is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

“The number of shares constituting the Initial Holding Preferred Stock shall be 800,000, and the number of shares constituting the Series B Stock shall be 800,000 (when issued).”

The last two sentences of section c(i)****of the Certificate of Designation of the Company are hereby deleted and replacedin their entirety with the following:

“Any dividend on the Holding Preferred Stock payable pursuant to this paragraph (c)(i) on or prior to April 15, 2004shall be, at the option of Holding, payable (1) in cash or (2) through the issuance of a number of additional shares (including fractional shares) of Holding Preferred Stock (the “Additional Shares”) equal to the dividend amount divided bythe Liquidation Preference of such Additional Shares. With respect to dividends payable after April 15, 2004, all dividends shall be payable solely in cash.”

Section (f)(ii)(A)(1) of the Certificate of Designation of the Company is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

“dividends on the Holding Preferred Stock are in arrears and unpaid and, in the case of the dividends payable after April 15, 2004, are not paid in cash for six or more Dividend Periods (whether or not consecutive)(a “DividendDefault”);”

Section (m)(ii)(1) of the Certificate of Designation of the Company is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with thefollowing:

“up to 800,000 shares of Initial Holding Preferred Stock for original issue and”;

**THIRD:**          The amendment effected herein was authorized by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority ofeach class of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware by written consent of the stockholders obtained in accordance with Section 228 of the General CorporationLaw of the State of Delaware.

**FOURTH:**     The capital of the corporation will not bereduced under or by reason of this amendment.

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Amendment this 7th day of April,2003.

  

 

 

 

 

 

By: 

/s/ CHARLES A. FRENCH

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name: **Charles A. French**Title:   **President**
# C_2006249EN.01001202.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/12

---

Action brought on 8 August 2006 — American Clothing Associates v OHIM (figurative mark — maple leaf and the letters RW)

(Case T-215/06)

(2006/C 249/31)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: American Clothing Associates (Evergem, Belgium) (represented by: P. Maeyaert and N. Clarembeaux, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 May 2006 in Case R 1463/2005-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 May 2006 in Case R 1463/2005-1;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark consisting of a representation of a maple leaf and the letters RW in respect of goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 40 (application No 2 785 368)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal to register

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant first pleads infringement of Article 7(1)(h) of Council Regulation No 40/94 and of Article 6 ter of the Paris Convention in so far as the Board of Appeal of OHIM failed to take into consideration the overall impression of the mark applied for and erred in its assessment of the imitative heraldic character of a maple leaf from which it is formed. The applicant also claims that the Board of Appeal was wrong to refuse to take into consideration the reputation of the trade mark when applying an absolute ground for refusal provided for in Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 158.1002 Appointment of advisory appointees. ( a ) Appointment of an individual, including a former DHS-CS employee, to an advisory appointment is governed by this subpart J and subpart E of this part.
( b ) An individual for appointment to an advisory appointment must participate in the assessment program described in § 158.520. The Secretary or designee must approve the appointment of an individual to an advisory appointment by name, and an individual appointed to an advisory appointment serves at the will of the Secretary.
( c ) A DHS-CS advisory appointee may be removed at any time. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 7511(b), the provisions of 5 U.S.C. Chapter 75, subchapter II do not apply to talent management actions taken under this part for a DHS advisory appointee.
( d ) An advisory appointment terminates no later than the end of the term of the U.S. President under which the advisory appointee was appointed.
( e ) The Secretary or designee establishes a limit on the number of advisory appointments under this subpart J, and the total number of advisory appointments under this subpart may not exceed that limit at any time.
( f ) The Department may not change an advisory appointment to a renewable appointment or continuing appointment.
( g ) The Department may not use an advisory appointment solely or primarily for the purpose of detailing any individual to the White House.
§ 292.20 What information must the consultation letter include? ( a ) The consultation letter required by § 292.19(a) must: ( 1 ) Describe or show the location of the proposed gaming establishment;
( 2 ) Provide information on the proposed scope of gaming; and
( 3 ) Include other information that may be relevant to a specific proposal, such as the size of the proposed gaming establishment, if known.
( b ) The consultation letter must include a request to the recipients to submit comments, if any, on the following areas within 60 days of receiving the letter: ( 1 ) Information regarding environmental impacts on the surrounding community and plans for mitigating adverse impacts;
( 2 ) Anticipated impacts on the social structure, infrastructure, services, housing, community character, and land use patterns of the surrounding community;
( 3 ) Anticipated impact on the economic development, income, and employment of the surrounding community;
( 4 ) Anticipated costs of impacts to the surrounding community and identification of sources of revenue to mitigate them;
( 5 ) Anticipated costs, if any, to the surrounding community of treatment programs for compulsive gambling attributable to the proposed gaming establishment; and
( 6 ) Any other information that may assist the Secretary in determining whether the proposed gaming establishment would or would not be detrimental to the surrounding community.
Consent(Director)


EXHIBIT 10.01

GOLDEN SPIRIT ENTERPRISES LTD.

(the “Company”)

CONSENT TO ACT AS DIRECTOR

I hereby consent to act as a director of the Company and acknowledge that I am not disqualified to become or to act as a director under Section 141 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

I hereby confirm that:

1

I am not under the age of 18 years;

2

I have not been found by a court, in the United States of America or elsewhere, to be incapable of managing my own affairs;

3

I am not an undischarged bankrupt; and

4

I have not been convicted in or out of Delaware of an offence in connection with the promotion, formation or management of a corporation or unincorporated business, or of an offence involving fraud.




In addition, the undersigned hereby consents to the holding of any meeting of the directors or of a committee of the directors of the Company by means of such telephonic, electronic or other communication facility, as permit all persons participating in the subject meetings to communicate adequately with each other.




This consent shall continue in effect from year to year so long as the undersigned is re-elected to the board of directors, provided that in the event that the undersigned revokes this consent or resigns from the board of directors, this consent shall cease to have effect from the date of receipt in writing by the Company of such revocation or resignation, as the case may be, or, if the latter, the effective date of such resignation.

DIRECTORS HAVE SUBSTANTIAL DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT LIABILITIES. THE PERSON SIGNING THIS CONSENT SHOULD OBTAIN INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE.

		
	Dated

	June 3, 2008


	Print name

	Marc Scheive


	Address

	7811 Eoul Louis-H

LaFontaine, Bureau 102

Anjou, Quebec, H1K 4E4


	Signature

	/s/: M. Scheive
### §1751a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 29, 1948, ch. 711, §2, 62 Stat. 1091, related to establishment of Bureau of Federal Credit Unions. See section 1752a of this title.