alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-33.12
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, MN 55414


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Management of the Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services
division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regard
to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government
(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").


Period:  As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the "Period").

Applicable Servicing Criteria:

The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and
1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Management of
the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.


With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company's management provides
the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

1. The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company management has assessed the Company compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to management's assertion of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association

By:    /s/ Shari Gillund
       Shari L. Gillund

Title: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 15, 2013


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### § 13.45 Deposit in Treasury of United States.

All amounts collected pursuant to this part will be deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the Treasury of the United States, except as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3806(g).
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲ ★

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/02

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
§ 111.36 Who will review the respondent's written response? ( a ) A reviewing officer shall review the respondent's written response. The reviewing officer shall be a person who has not been involved in the reason to believe finding.
( b ) The reviewing officer shall review the reason to believe finding with supporting records and the respondent's written response with supporting records. The reviewing officer may request supplemental information from the respondent and/or the Commission staff. The respondent shall submit the supplemental information to the reviewing officer within a time specified by the reviewing officer. The reviewing officer will be entitled to draw an adverse inference from the failure by the respondent to submit the supplemental information.
( c ) All records required to be submitted by the respondents pursuant to this section and § 111.35 should be submitted in the form of affidavits or declarations.
( d ) If the Commission staff, after the respondent files a written response pursuant to § 111.35, forwards any additional documents pertaining to the matter to the reviewing officer for his or her examination, the reviewing officer shall also furnish a copy of the records to the respondents.
( e ) Upon completion of the review, the reviewing officer shall forward a written recommendation to the Commission along with all records required under this section and 11 CFR 111.32 and 111.35.
( f ) The reviewing office shall also forward a copy of the recommendation to the respondent. The respondent may file with the Commission Secretary a written response to the recommendation within ten (10) days of transmittal of the recommendation. This response may not raise any arguments not raised in the respondent's original written response or not directly responsive to the reviewing officer's recommendation.
[65 FR 31794, May 19, 2000, as amended at 89 FR 218, Jan. 2, 2024]
§ 5.29 Fees. ( a ) Fees for access requests granted in full under the Privacy Act are limited to duplication fees, which are chargeable to the same extent that fees are chargeable under subpart A of this part. An access request not granted in full under the Privacy Act will be processed under the FOIA and will be subject to all fees chargeable under the applicable FOIA regulations. Fees are not charged for processing amendment and accounting requests.
( b ) DHS will not process a request under the Privacy Act or JRA from persons with an unpaid fee from any previous Privacy Act or JRA request to any Federal agency until that outstanding fee has been paid in full to the agency.
# C_2016255DE.01001001.xml

| 14.7.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 255/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 255/10

---

Berichtigung der Mitteilung der Kommission Leitlinien der Europäischen Kommission zu Berichten über den Ausgangszustand gemäß Artikel 22 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 2010/75/EU über Industrieemissionen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 136 vom 6. Mai 2014
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 136 vom 6. Mai 2014

(2016/C 255/07)

Seite 10 Abschnitt 5.3 Absatz 3:

Anstatt:

Anstatt

„Die Methode der Lagerung, Handhabung und Verwendung der relevanten gefährlichen Stoffe muss ebenso ermittelt werden wie die Frage, ob es Eindämmungsmechanismen gibt, mit denen das Eintreten von Emissionen verhindert wird, wie zum Beispiel Bünde, Standflächen, Handhabungsverfahren.“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen

„Die Methode der Lagerung, Handhabung und Verwendung der relevanten gefährlichen Stoffe muss ebenso ermittelt werden wie die Frage, ob es Eindämmungsmechanismen gibt, mit denen das Eintreten von Emissionen verhindert wird, wie zum Beispiel Tankumwallungen, Standflächen, Handhabungsverfahren.“

Seite 11 Abschnitt 5.4 Absatz 2 Ziffer ii dritter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

Anstatt

„Wartungsunterlagen — geht aus ihnen hervor, dass Entwässerungsleitungen, Tanks, Bünde, Rohrleitungen usw. in gutem Zustand sind? Werden sie seit Beginn der Tätigkeiten geführt oder sind sie erst vor kurzem eingeführt worden?“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen

„Wartungsunterlagen — geht aus ihnen hervor, dass Entwässerungsleitungen, Tanks, Tankumwallungen, Rohrleitungen usw. in gutem Zustand sind? Werden sie seit Beginn der Tätigkeiten geführt oder sind sie erst vor kurzem eingeführt worden?“

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Pacheco, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 671]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas J. Iacovetta, J., at plea; John E Collins, J., at sentence), rendered September 10, 2003, as amended August 30, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41/2 to 9 years, and judgment, same court (John N. Byrne, J.), rendered October 15, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a consecutive term of 21/2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal his robbery conviction did not meet the requirements of *People v Lopez*(6 NY3d 248 [2006]). In any event, regardless of the validity of defen*319dant’s appeal waiver, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentences.

Since the clerical error at issue has already been corrected, defendant’s claim concerning a DNA databank fee is moot. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
§ 89.41 Exceptions to policy. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs upon concurrence of the Solicitor and receipt of a recommendation as provided by § 89.43 may, in his/her discretion, authorize the direct or indirect expenditure of appropriated funds to pay reasonable attorney's fees in order to permit an Indian tribe to secure private legal representation in the following circumstances: ( a ) When a tribe determines it necessary to bring a court action or to defend itself to protect its trust resources, rights claimed under a treaty, agreement, executive order, or statute, or its governmental powers and the Attorney General refuses assistance or advises that assistance is not otherwise available (Comptroller General's Opinion B-114868, December 6, 1976).
( b ) When a tribe determines it necessary to institute or to defend itself in an administrative proceeding to protect its trust resources, rights claimed under a treaty, agreement, executive order, or statute, or to protect its governmental powers and the Solicitor is unable to provide representation due to a conflict of interest or other reasons.
( c ) When a tribe determines legal assistance necessary, other than for litigation, pursuant to a contract executed under Pub. L. 93-638 and the Solicitor has determined that the services of his office are not available.
( d ) When a tribe determines it critical, and the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs finds the concerns of the tribe to have merit after consultation with and the advice of the Solicitor, to intervene, in a lawsuit being handled by the Justice Department or in an administrative proceeding being handled by the Solicitor because the responsible Government Attorney refuses either to exclude or to include some facet of the suit or proceedings which the tribe claims renders such legal representation completely inadequate to protect or in contravention of the rights and interests of the tribe. Prior to consulting with and advising the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, in a lawsuit being handled by the Justice Department, the Solicitor shall seek the comments and advice of the Attorney General.
( e ) When a tribe determines, and the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, after consultation with the Solicitor concurs, that a substantial possibility of a negotiated settlement or agreement exists.
( f ) Payment of fees will not be allowed if such payment was not authorized before services were performed.
( g ) This rule applies to expenditure of appropriated Federal funds and not a tribe's own funds on deposit in the U.S. Treasury.
# C_2007056EN.01002101.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/21

---

Action brought on 12 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-6/07)

(2007/C 56/38)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/74/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 80/987/EEC on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, and in any case, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/74/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 80/987/EEC on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, and in any case, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive;

1

| — | Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for the transposition into national law of Directive 2002/74 expired on 8 October 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 270, 2002, p. 10.

1

---
# C_2007069EN.01003001.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/30

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 February 2007 — Guarneri v Commission

(Case F-62/06) (1)

1

(Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Rule against overlapping allowances applicable to national allowances)

(2007/C 69/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Daniela Guarneri (Woluwe-Saint-Étienne, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Curall and D. Martin, Agents)

Defendant:

:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission's decision of 5 August 2005 applying the rule against overlapping allowances laid down in Article 67(2) of the Staff Regulations to the deduction of the Belgian orphans' pension from the family allowance received by the applicant and also annulment of the Appointing Authority's decision of 14 February 2006 rejecting the applicant's complaint against the contested decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 5 August 2005 in so far as it deducts the amount of the Belgian orphans' pension received by Mme Guarneri from the family allowance paid to her; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 5 August 2005 in so far as it deducts the amount of the Belgian orphans' pension received by Mme Guarneri from the family allowance paid to her;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs;

| 4. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006, p. 35.

1

---
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_2\Routes_AltC.pdf

Location in Arizona

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Travel Management

Alternative C

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Legend

Map 2-21

Data Source:

OHV and Route Alternative Designations: BLM 2006

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: U.S. Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Note:

 Land use allocations, designations, and management 

 prescriptions apply only to public lands administered

 by the BLM. If non-Federal lands are acquired, they

 would be managed according to the allocations

 depicted on the map.

Off-highway Vehicle Designations

Limited to Designated Roads and Trails

Reference Information

Access Points

Access through Private Land

Access through State Trust Land

Access through Indian Land

Access through Public Land

Route Designations

Surface Management

American Indian Reservation

Military Reservations

State Trust Lands

State, County, City; Wildlife, Park and Outdoor Recreation

Areas

Private

Bureau of Land Management

Pima County

National Park Service

Bureau of Reclamation

Closed 

Closed for Reclamation

Non-motorized

Motorized
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24 - 0147

_________________ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA, and SAMUEL DICKMAN, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their patients,

Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. ST ATE OF MONTANA, by and through AUSTIN KNUDSEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Upon consideration of the motion for leave to file an amicus brief filed by the American College of Obstetricians, et al., and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED . Amici are granted leave to file an amicus brief on or before August 14 , 2024.

Electronically signed by: Dirk Sandefur Justice, Montana Supreme Court August 13 2024

08/13/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0147
# C_2007056EN.01001101.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-104/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Tax legislation - Deferral of taxation on capital gains arising on sale of residential property - Articles 18 EC, 39 EC and 43 EC - Articles 28 and 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area)

(2007/C 56/18)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Ström van Lier and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Kruse, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 18 EC, 39 EC, 43 EC and 56(1) EC and of Articles 28, 31 and 40 of the EEA Agreement — National legislation making deferral of taxation on capital gains arising on the sale of owner-occupied property when the taxable person acquires a replacement property conditional on both properties being on national territory

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force tax provisions, such as those in Chapter 47 of the law on income tax (1999:1229) (inkomstskattelagen (1999:1229)), which make entitlement to deferral of taxation on capital gains arising from the sale of a private residential property or of a right to reside in a private cooperative property conditional on the newly-acquired residence also being on Swedish territory, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 18 EC, 39 EC and 43 EC and under Articles 28 and 31 of the EEA Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force tax provisions, such as those in Chapter 47 of the law on income tax (1999:1229) (inkomstskattelagen (1999:1229)), which make entitlement to deferral of taxation on capital gains arising from the sale of a private residential property or of a right to reside in a private cooperative property conditional on the newly-acquired residence also being on Swedish territory, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 18 EC, 39 EC and 43 EC and under Articles 28 and 31 of the EEA Agreement;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

1

---
# C_2007043EN.01000402.xml

| 27.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4530 — 3i Group/Azelis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 43/05)

On 19 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4530. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4530. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### § 522.10 Approval by operation of law.

If the Chair fails to approve or disapprove an ordinance, resolution, or amendment thereto submitted under § 522.2 or § 522.3 within 90 days after the date of submission to the Chair, the tribal ordinance, resolution, or amendment thereto shall be considered to have been approved by the Chair but only to the extent that such ordinance, resolution, or amendment thereto is consistent with the provisions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or Act) and this chapter.