alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ITXC CORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      87,893,850
<SECURITIES>                               123,301,086
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,597,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,021,565
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           224,173,898
<PP&E>                                      31,393,548
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,620,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             259,411,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,512,230
<BONDS>                                      1,723,191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,532
<OTHER-SE>                                 289,334,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               259,411,004
<SALES>                                     33,685,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,685,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,619,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,939,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,437,854
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             326,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (21,474,409)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (21,474,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (21,474,409)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)


</TABLE>
```

EX-34.1
(logo)pwc

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.
(the "Company"), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax
service provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2012 and for the year
then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi),
1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which
the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed
by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing
customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 6, 2013

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201
T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
```
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lil Marc, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph P. Wynne,
principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

August 13, 2002


                                           /s/ Joseph P. Wynne
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Joseph P. Wynne
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2012-2 Owner Trust
(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the unaffiliated party Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.







Date: June 10, 2014







/s/ Paul C. Honda_______________

Paul C. Honda
Vice President and Assistant Secretary

of American Honda Finance Corporation

(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-60725

Summary Calendar

MARICELA ESCALANTE-ALVAREZ,

Petitioner

v.

LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A078 974 638

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Maricela Escalante-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions 

this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) 

dismissing her appeal from the denial of her motion to reopen her in absentia 

removal proceedings. We review the denial of such motions under a highly 

deferential abuse-of-discretion standard and will uphold the decision of the 

BIA unless it is capricious, without foundation in the evidence, or otherwise so 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 10, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-60725 Document: 00513543183 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/10/2016
No. 14-60725

2

irrational that it is arbitrary rather than the result of any perceptible rational 

approach. See Panjwani v. Gonzales, 401 F.3d 626, 632 (5th Cir. 2005); Zhao 

v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 304 (5th Cir. 2005). Motions to reopen are 

disfavored, and we have held that the moving party “bears a heavy burden.” 

Altamirano-Lopez v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 547, 549 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted). 

Escalante-Alvarez asserts that the BIA abused its discretion in refusing 

to reopen the removal proceedings on account of changed country conditions in 

Honduras. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). She argues that she presented 

evidence showing that violence against women in Honduras, particularly 

murder, has increased dramatically. However, the evidence presented reflects 

that violence against women has been, and remains, an ongoing problem in 

Honduras. In addition, Escalante-Alvarez failed to compare in any meaningful 

way the conditions in Honduras at the time of her 2002 removal hearing and 

her 2013 motion to reopen. Thus, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its 

discretion because its decision was not capricious, without foundation in the 

evidence, or otherwise so irrational that it is arbitrary. See Zhao, 404 F.3d at 

304. Finally, Escalante-Alvarez argues that the BIA erred by failing to 

consider her eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief; 

however, the BIA was not required to consider these other issues in light of its 

conclusion on her motion to reopen.

Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.

 Case: 14-60725 Document: 00513543183 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/10/2016
**i** ***..#...*** **OFFICE OF**  **THE AITORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Bonorablo

Zrnwt 3~1~ CountyAttornry I!2 Pa80 County El P880, Toxnr



### We 8ra 

### in reorlpt oa thr 

### above

pueatloa. In loor lettrry 8 numb6rof **or8** In hour@ tit10 la 0 r h88 noelred **a right**  **of** brrltiriort*r

or ilorr rnd rhou 8SOS8OPand COllOOt1118 Olrar thethouse er then **ona xiotor**  prohln the C~rtirloatr of the **1eWS** in **sXf8teUOa** era prior **ta** tho Cortlrloqto d **8till** remain In exletwioo, the h 18 **OUt8idO Of**  th0 **jWiISdiOtiOII Or**  8nd aOll@OtOr'II

OrrtOO.
@dotion1 **or** Art10101436-1, known as the **a0rtiri** oato or TitleAot, doolaroathat the loglslatite lntsnt in onaotlng this la* $8 to agrevont tho **theft or**  motorreh~olo8w and to rogulato"the sali Or . . . **motor** fohi0108*,

Sootlon**2** Or &tiOb 113~1, **prorid** *The term %otor Yohlolb’ moans 

### ovary **kind or**  **motor &Iron**  or **vrovolled** rehlolo**now or-** 

## Y68

. .
HonorrUe Brnomt Cuim, Pa80 2
hermitor rrqulrrd **to bo**  **nghtorod** or llosneod uudor tho law0 **or this**  **~:tato."** AV-) (Vndorsoorin(
lie provl8lon8 Oi thr Cortlfloate of Tltlo **Aot QUT..**  port to dsrl with rnythln& othor than %otor TOhiOlO8"88 

### d~rin~d ~OTO. It may bo notloadthat the r&8tr8tiOn **rkt** UtO8 (AHi 66750-1, **SUb8OOtiOn (bl)**  dOiln0l **“mtOr** tohi010" 88 *otory rohiolethat 18 self-propollod*, and a *tr8llorn **(Siabbrrotion** (6)) 18 aotei~ rohlolo dsrlpd **or us.6**  **to** oarry it8 load wholly on It8 own structureand to be dram **by** l not&rr r h l

o lo * . IPo agree wltb rour oomtruotlon or tho law to tho **dr00t** that tho Cortlrlorto **0r** Tltao law door not **purport to**  doal with any vohloloother than ono motor propollod and thornrore **doe8** not **arr0ot** the lam In **oxl8tenoo** whloh nlrto to trailer8 **snd** the transfsrs thereof. Your8 tory truly

ATTOlum t3EmBALQ TmAs

AFKmp
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 16, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 16, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0022. IN THE INTEREST OF M. P. B. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER).
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 1800229 1800228
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wei Shi, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Toyota Auto Receivables 2012-A Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.














March 21, 2013                                                                           By:  /S/ WEI SHI





Wei Shi




Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as Depositor


(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)


- 10 -
§ 81.1 What is the purpose of this part? This part prescribes the Department's procedures for authorizing and conducting elections when Federal statute or the terms of a tribal governing document require the Secretary to conduct and approve an election to: ( a ) Adopt, amend, or revoke tribal governing documents; or
( b ) Adopt or amend charters.
# C_2007013EN.01000201.xml

| 19.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4429 — AIG/GIP/Stratfield)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 13/03)

On 23 November 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4429. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4429. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

11 a.m., Friday March 18, 2011.

# PLACE: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011-4683 Filed 2-25-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Cencosud S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Company (the Form 20-F) fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Daniel Rodriguez  
|Name:                  |  | Daniel Rodriguez       
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                  |  | April 29, 2014         
|                      
|/s/ Juan Manuel Parada
|Name:                  |  | Juan Manuel Parada     
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                  |  | April 29, 2014
# C_2006294EN.01002902.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/29

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 21 September 2006 — Eivind F. Kramme v SAS Scandinavian Airlines Danmark A/S

(Case C-396/06)

(2006/C 294/52)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eivind F. Kramme

Applicant:

Defendant: SAS Scandinavian Airlines Danmark A/S

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is there an extraordinary circumstance when an aircraft is taken out of operation due to technical problems, with the result that a flight is cancelled (see Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is there an extraordinary circumstance when an aircraft is taken out of operation due to technical problems, with the result that a flight is cancelled (see Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91)?

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, which reasonable measures for the purposes of the Regulation must an air carrier then take to avoid flight cancellations due to technical problems? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, which reasonable measures for the purposes of the Regulation must an air carrier then take to avoid flight cancellations due to technical problems?

| 3. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, has an air carrier then taken all reasonable measures to avoid cancellation for the purposes of the Regulation if it can be established that there were no aircraft available for use for the flight in respect of which an aircraft which was taken out of operation due to technical problems was scheduled to be used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, has an air carrier then taken all reasonable measures to avoid cancellation for the purposes of the Regulation if it can be established that there were no aircraft available for use for the flight in respect of which an aircraft which was taken out of operation due to technical problems was scheduled to be used?

| 4. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, is it relevant that the documentation concerning the technical problems relied on by the air carrier originates solely from the air carrier itself? |
| --- | --- |

4.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, is it relevant that the documentation concerning the technical problems relied on by the air carrier originates solely from the air carrier itself?

---
#### BARBER v. WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INS. SOCIETY

No. 481P89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 340

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to additional issues denied 1 March 1990.