alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# US Sailors, Marines Enhance Regional Cooperation during CARAT Thailand 2015 

By Task Force 73 Public Affairs 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
# C_2006326EN.01003802.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/38

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 6 November 2006 — Sophiane Gysen v Groupe S — Caisse d'Assurances sociales pour indépendants

(Case C-449/06)

(2006/C 326/81)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sophiane Gysen

Applicant:

Defendant: Groupe S — Caisse d'Assurances sociales pour indépendants

Defendant:

Question referred

May, or must, Article 67(1) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) [No 259/68] of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (1) and Annex VII thereto, entitled ‘Remuneration ...’, Section 1: Family allowances, which comprise

1

| (a) | household allowance, |
| --- | --- |

(a)

household allowance,

| (b) | dependent child allowance, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

dependent child allowance,

| (c) | education allowance, |
| --- | --- |

(c)

education allowance,

be regarded as constituting what the national rules in question describe as an ‘... international social security convention in force in Belgium’?

---

(1)  JO L 56, p. 1.

1

---
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 14

Fixing the daily hour of meeting of the First Session of the One Hundred

Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. DREIER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Fixing the daily hour of meeting of the First Session of

the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, before Mon2 day, May 10, 1999, the hour of daily meeting of the House

3 shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; 11 a.m. on Tuesdays; and

4 10 a.m. on all other days of the week; and from Monday,

5 May 10, 1999, until the end of the second session, the

6 hour of daily meeting of the House shall be noon on Mon7 days; 10 a.m. on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays;

8 and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week.

Æ
### §949i. Pleas of the accused

(a) Plea of Not Guilty.—If an accused in a military commission under this chapter after a plea of guilty sets up matter inconsistent with the plea, or if it appears that the accused has entered the plea of guilty through lack of understanding of its meaning and effect, or if the accused fails or refuses to plead, a plea of not guilty shall be entered in the record, and the military commission shall proceed as though the accused had pleaded not guilty.

(b) Finding of Guilt After Guilty Plea.—With respect to any charge or specification to which a plea of guilty has been made by the accused in a military commission under this chapter and accepted by the military judge, including a charge or specification that has been referred capital, a finding of guilty of the charge or specification may be entered by the military judge immediately without a vote by the members. The finding shall constitute the finding of the military commission unless the plea of guilty is withdrawn prior to announcement of the sentence, in which event the proceedings shall continue as though the accused had pleaded not guilty.

(c) Pre-Trial Agreements.—(1) A plea of guilty made by the accused that is accepted by a military judge under subsection (b) and not withdrawn prior to announcement of the sentence may form the basis for an agreement reducing the maximum sentence approved by the convening authority, including the reduction of a sentence of death to a lesser punishment, or that the case will be referred to a military commission under this chapter without seeking the penalty of death. Such an agreement may provide for terms and conditions in addition to a guilty plea by the accused in order to be effective.

(2) A plea agreement under this subsection may not provide for a sentence of death imposed by a military judge alone. A sentence of death may only be imposed by the unanimous vote of all members of a military commission concurring in the sentence of death as provided in section 949m(b)(2)(D) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2587; amended Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, §1030(b), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1570; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, §1071(f)(9), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3510.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 949i, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2614, related to pleas of the accused, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted a comma for ",," after "referred capital".

2011—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–81, §1030(b)(1), in the first sentence, inserted ", including a charge or specification that has been referred capital," after "military judge", "by the military judge" after "may be entered", and "by the members" after "vote".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–81, §1030(b)(2), added subsec. (c).
# C_2006326EN.01003701.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/37

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 31 October 2006 — A.G. Winkel v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

(Case C-446/06)

(2006/C 326/78)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A.G. Winkel

Applicant:

Defendant: Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Are rules which, as regards the right to a suckler-cow premium, require, on the basis of the usual animal husbandry practice, that a cow has calved at least once in the period which runs from twenty months before to four months after the date on which the application period started and its calf was not removed from the herd within four months after its birth, compatible with Article 3(f) of Regulation (EC) (1) No 1254/1999? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are rules which, as regards the right to a suckler-cow premium, require, on the basis of the usual animal husbandry practice, that a cow has calved at least once in the period which runs from twenty months before to four months after the date on which the application period started and its calf was not removed from the herd within four months after its birth, compatible with Article 3(f) of Regulation (EC) (1) No 1254/1999?

1

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, what criteria must be applied to establish whether the herd is intended for rearing calves for meat production and which cows belong to that herd? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, what criteria must be applied to establish whether the herd is intended for rearing calves for meat production and which cows belong to that herd?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999, of 17 May 1999, on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (OJ 1999 L 160, p. 21).

1

---
H. Res. 516

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 7, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3605) to establish the San Rafael Western

Legacy District in the State of Utah, and for other purposes.

The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived.

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order

to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment

under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of

a substitute recommended by the Committee on Resources

now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. The amend-
2

•HRES 516 EH

ment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as read and shall

not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII.

Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone

until a time during further consideration in the Committee of

the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment;

and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another

electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the

minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series

of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments
3

•HRES 516 EH

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except

one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
-  Home 

# Approvals Tier 1 Fitness Evaluation Form

IFR Fitness Evaluation Form_08182010.pdf (122.18 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.120 How does an Indian tribe or tribal organization find out about a construction project? Within 30 days after the Secretary's allocation of funds for planning phase, design phase, or construction phase activities for a specific project, the Secretary shall notify, by registered mail with return receipt in order to document mailing, the Indian tribe or tribal organization(s) to be benefitted by the availability of the funds for each phase of a project. The Secretarial notice of fund allocation shall offer technical assistance in the preparation of a contract proposal. ( a ) The Secretary shall, within 30 days after receiving a request from an Indian tribe or tribal organization, furnish the Indian tribe or tribal organization with all information available to the Secretary about the project including, but not limited to: construction drawings, maps, engineering reports, design reports, plans of requirements, cost estimates, environmental assessments, or environmental impact reports and archeological reports.
( b ) An Indian tribe or tribal organization is not required to request this information prior to submitting a notification of intent to contract or a contract proposal.
( c ) The Secretary shall have a continuing responsibility to furnish information.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 623 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 623

 Regarding the adoption of Resolution 1322 by the Security Council of 
                 the United Nations on October 7, 2000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2000

Mr. Franks of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Ose, Mr. Weiner, Mr. Saxton, 
  Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. 
  Smith of New Jersey, Mrs. Roukema, and Mr. LoBiondo) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Regarding the adoption of Resolution 1322 by the Security Council of 
                 the United Nations on October 7, 2000.

Whereas the Security Council of the United Nations voted in emergency session to 
        adopt Resolution 1322 on October 7, 2000;
Whereas such resolution uniquely condemns Israel for acts of violence, and cites 
        the excessive use of force by Israelis against Palestinians starting on 
        September 28, 2000;
Whereas such resolution fails to recognize the violence against Israel and the 
        citizens of Israel that is organized and instigated by Palestinian 
        officials and police;
Whereas such resolution implicitly criticizes the visit by Israeli Likud 
        official Ariel Sharon to Jerusalem's holy sites, which are open to 
        members of all faiths; and
Whereas Israel has made persistent and unprecedented attempts to secure a peace 
        agreement with the Palestinians: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) denounces the abstention by the United States from 
        voting on Resolution 1322, which was adopted by the Security 
        Council of the United Nations on October 7, 2000;
            (2) calls upon the President to declare such resolution 
        null and void as a matter of national policy;
            (3) urges the member states of the United Nations to 
        vigorously oppose any and all efforts to manipulate the Fourth 
        Geneva Convention for the sole purpose of attacking Israel;
            (4) condemns the Security Council of the United Nations for 
        its one-sided condemnation of Israel, which failed to take into 
        account the causes of the violence and the right of Israel as a 
        sovereign state to defend its citizens and soldiers from life 
        threatening attacks; and
            (5) urges leaders of the Israeli and Palestinian peoples to 
        seek a secure future for all citizens of the Middle East 
        through a full and thorough peace process.
                                 <all>
```
Bio-One Corporation
        310 Waymont Court, Suite 100 * Lake Mary, FL 32746
                   (407) 328-1611 * Fax (407) 328-1612


                  FRANK CLARK CONSULTING AGREEMENT SUMMARY
                  ----------------------------------------

OBJECTIVES

1)	RAISE CAPITAL
2)	BUILD REVENUES
3)	COUNSEL MANAGEMENT

COMPENSATION FORMULA

1)	RAISE CAPITAL
A)	ROUND ONE (PRE-PUBLIC)
      * 10% ON THE CASH RAISED AND PAID IN CASH
      * 10% ON THE STOCK ISSUED AND PAID IN "144" STOCK
      * THIS APPLIES TO ALL THOSE THAT CONSULTANT BRINGS IN
B)	ROUND TWO (POST PUBLIC)
      * 7% ON THE FIRST $5 MILLION ON DIRECT CASH RAISED
      * 5% ON EVERYTHING ABOVE $5 MILLION ON DIRECT CASH RAISED
      * 20% OF THE FEE PAID TO THOSE INTRODUCED BY CONSULTANT
        --- WITH A CAP ON TOTAL FEES PAID OF 8.4% ON THE FIRST $5 MILLION
            AND 6% ON EVERYTHING ABOVE $5 MILLION
      * ALL FEES TO BE PAID IN "144" STOCK AND AT A 20% DISCOUNT FROM
        THE PREVIOUS 90 DAY DAILY TRADING AVERAGE

2)	BUILD REVENUES
A)	FOR EACH $10 MILLION IN ANNUAL REVENUES CONSULTANT
        WOULD RECEIVE 100,000 SHARES OF "144" STOCK

3)	COUNSEL MANAGEMENT
A)	$1,500 PER DAY
B)	AN "HONOR SYSTEM" OF ACCOUNTING FOR HOURS
C)      PAID QUARTERLY IN "144" STOCK AND AT A 20% DISCOUNT FROM
        THE PREVIOUS 90 DAY DAILY TRADING AVERAGE

NOTES: 1) This agreement is to cover the time span for the consultant to earn
          one million shares of "144" stock. Once that has been achieved, then
          the consultant and the Company would negotiate the future fee
          structure.
       2) Fees that have been accruing for services rendered since November,
          2000 are to be included in this compensation formula.

Bio-One Corporation                                 Consultant


/s/ Armand Dauplaise 1/17/01                        s/s Frank Clark
----------------------------                        ---------------
Armand Dauplaise, President                         Frank Clark, Consultant
### §16. Funding of Office

The Comptroller of the Currency may collect an assessment, fee, or other charge from any entity described in section 1813(q)(1) of this title, as the Comptroller determines is necessary or appropriate to carry out the responsibilities of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. In establishing the amount of an assessment, fee, or charge collected from an entity under this section, the Comptroller of the Currency may take into account the nature and scope of the activities of the entity, the amount and type of assets that the entity holds, the financial and managerial condition of the entity, and any other factor, as the Comptroller of the Currency determines is appropriate. Funds derived from any assessment, fee, or charge collected or payment made pursuant to this section may be deposited by the Comptroller of the Currency in accordance with the provisions of section 192 of this title. Such funds shall not be construed to be Government funds or appropriated monies, and shall not be subject to apportionment for purposes of chapter 15 of title 31 or any other provision of law. The authority of the Comptroller of the Currency under this section shall be in addition to the authority under subchapter XV of chapter 3.

The Comptroller of the Currency shall have sole authority to determine the manner in which the obligations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency shall be incurred and its disbursements and expenses allowed and paid, in accordance with this section, except as provided in chapter 71 of title 5 (with respect to compensation).

(R.S. §5240A, as added Pub. L. 111–203, title III, §318(b), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1526.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapter XV of chapter 3, referred to in first par., was in the original a reference to section 5240 of the Revised Statutes.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 111–203, title III, §318(e), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1527, provided that: "This section [enacting this section and amending sections 248, 481, 482, and 1820 of this title], and the amendments made by this section, shall take effect on the transfer date."

[For definition of "transfer date" as used in section 318(e) of Pub. L. 111–203, set out above, see section 5301 of this title.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.96 How can Indian tribes or tribal organizations learn about BIA and IHS excess property?

The Secretary shall not less than annually send to Indian tribes and tribal organizations a listing of all excess BIA or IHS personal property before reporting the property to GSA or to any other Federal agency as excess. The listing shall identify the agency official to whom a request for donation shall be submitted.