alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9281. Service medals: issue; replacement; availability of appropriations

(a) The Secretary of the Air Force shall procure, and issue without charge to any person entitled thereto, any service medal authorized for members of the Air Force or the Space Force after September 26, 1947, and any ribbon, clasp, star, or similar device prescribed as a part of that medal.

(b) Under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, any medal or other device issued under subsection (a) that is lost, destroyed, or becomes unfit for use without fault or neglect of the owner, may be replaced at cost. However, if the owner is a member of the Air Force or the Space Force, the medal or device may be replaced without charge.

(c) The Secretary may spend, from any appropriation for the support of the Air Force or the Space Force, amounts necessary to provide medals and devices under this section.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 542, §8751; renumbered §9281, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(11), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(12)(A)(v), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3811.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8751(a)   8751(b)  8751(c) | 10:1415a (less 21st through 30th words, and less clauses (a) through (n)).10:1415b (less applicability to 10:1415a (clauses (a) through (n))).10:1415c (less applicability to 10:1415a (clauses (a) through (n))). | May 12, 1928, ch. 528, §§1 (less 25th through 34th words, and less clauses (a) through (n)), 2 (less applicability to §1 (clauses (a) through (n))), 3 (less applicability to §1 (clauses (a) through (n))), 45 Stat. 500. |

8751(b)

8751(c)

10:1415b (less applicability to 10:1415a (clauses (a) through (n))).

10:1415c (less applicability to 10:1415a (clauses (a) through (n))).

In subsection (a), the words "authorized for members of the Air Force after September 26, 1947" are substituted for the words "hereafter authorized", since, under Transfer Order 1, that date was the effective date of the transfer of personnel from the Army to the Air Force under section 208(e) of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended (5 U.S.C. 626c(e)). 10:1415a (proviso) is omitted as surplusage, since the revised section is not limited to persons who are members of the Air Force at the time of the issue.

In subsection (b), the words "member of the Air Force" are substituted for the words "persons in the military service of the United States".

In subsection (c), the last 16 words are substituted for 10:1415c (last 16 words).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted "or the Space Force" after "the Air Force" wherever appearing after the first appearance.

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8751 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
(logo)Grant Thornton

 

 

**GRANTTHORNTON LLP**

1201Walnut Street Suite 2200

KansasCity, M0 64106-2176

 

D   +1 816 412 2400

F   +1 816 412 2404

 

 

**REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

Boardof Directors and Management of

SitusHoldings, LLC

 

Wehave examined management's assertion, included in the accompanyingCertification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria("Management's Assertion"), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the"Company" or "Situs") a wholly-owned subsidiary of SitusAMCHoldings Corporation, complied with servicing criteria set forth in Items 1117,1119, 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for the Operating or Trust Advisor Services Platform(the "Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Theplatform consists of asset-backed transactions and securities for which theCompany was named as the Operating/Trust Advisor as defined by management inAppendix B of Management's report. Management is responsible for the Company'scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company's compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on ourexamination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance withattestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified PublicAccountants, and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for thePlatform and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backedtransactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whetherthe Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions andsecurities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the periodcovered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have includedservicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or securityconstituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detectmaterial noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered bythis report and that may have affected the Company's servicing activitiesduring the period covered by this report. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide alegal determination on the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. 

 

Inour opinion, management's assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with theaforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/Grant Thornton LLP

 

 

GRANTTHORNTON LLP

KansasCity, Missouri

February20, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 509 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 6, 2000.
Whereas artists, songwriters, producers, engineers, educators, executives, and 
        other professionals in the music industry provide inspiration and 
        leadership through their creation of music, dissemination of educational 
        information, and financial contributions to charitable and community-
        based organizations;
Whereas African-American music is indigenous to the United States and originates 
        from African genres of music;
Whereas African-American genres of music such as gospel, blues, jazz, rhythm and 
        blues, rap, the Motown sound, and hip-hop have their roots in the 
        African-American experience;
Whereas African-American music has a pervasive influence on dance, fashion, 
        language, art, literature, cinema, media, advertisements, and other 
        aspects of culture;
Whereas the prominence of African-American music in the 20th century has 
        reawakened interest in the legacy and heritage of the art form of 
        African-American music;
Whereas African-American music embodies the strong presence of, and significant 
        contributions made by, African-Americans in the music industry and 
        society as a whole;
Whereas the multibillion dollar African-American music industry contributes 
        greatly to the domestic and worldwide economy;
Whereas African-American music has a positive impact on and broad appeal to 
        diverse groups, both nationally and internationally; and
Whereas in 1979 President Carter recognized June as African-American Music 
        Month, and President Clinton subsequently recognized June as African-
        American Music Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the importance of the contributions of African-
        American music to global culture and the positive impact of African-
        American music on global commerce; and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to take the opportunity 
        to study, reflect on, and celebrate the majesty, vitality, and 
        importance of African-American music.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Judith Raich, Respondent, v Israel Raich, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 903]

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered August 25, 2005 the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balkin, J.), dated May 10, 2006, which, without a hearing, denied his motion, inter alia, for a downward modification of his maintenance obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying his motion for, inter alia, a downward modification of his maintenance obligation without first conducting an evidentiary hearing. The defendant failed to establish a factual basis to warrant a hearing on his alleged medical condition and forced retirement *(see Matter of Fein v Gilchrist,*23 AD3d 558 [2005]; *D'Alesio v D'Alesio,*300 AD2d 340 [2002]; *Mandelbaum v Mandelbaum,*26 AD3d 360 [2006]; *Trainor v Trainor,*188 AD2d 461 [1992]; *Praeger v Praeger,*162 AD2d 671, 674 [1990]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.E, Goldstein, Skelos and Fisher, JJ, concur.
H. Res. 662

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 30, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 121)

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be

in order without intervention of any point of order to consider

in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 122) making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2001, and for

other purposes. The joint resolution shall be considered as

read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage with-
2

•HRES 662 EH

out intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one

motion to recommit.

SEC. 3. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be

in order without intervention of any point of order to consider

in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 123) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and

for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be considered

as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and

(2) one motion to recommit.

SEC. 4. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be

in order without intervention of any point of order to consider

in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 124) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and

for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be considered

as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking
3

•HRES 662 EH

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and

(2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL BANK CIRCULATION
59–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–9 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 547—THE ADVANCED FUELS INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 

FEBRUARY 7, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. WELCH, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 133] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 133, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 547, The Advanced Fuels Infrastructure Research and Development Act, under 

an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate equally 

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Science and Technology. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill except those arising under clauses 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The rule 

makes in order the Committee on Science and Technology amendment in the nature of a substitute now printed in the bill as an 

original bill for the purpose of amendment. The amendment in the 

nature of a substitute shall be considered for amendment by section with each section considered as read. The rule authorizes the 

Chair to accord priority in recognition to Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record. Finally, 

the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

(except for clause 9 or 10 of Rule XXI) includes a waiver of clause 

2(h)(1) of rule XI (requiring that a quorum be present to report a 

measure or recommendation by a committee). 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
2 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an adment or motion to report, 

together with the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 43 

Date: February 7, 2007. 

Measure: H.R. 547. 

Motion By: Mr. Sessions. 

Summary of Motion: To make in order and provide appropriate 

waivers for an amendment by Rep. Burgess (TX), #5, which doubles 

the tax credit for making biodeisel from recycled restaurant grease 

from $.50 per gallon to $1.00 per gallon, thereby encouraging its 

production. This reduces petroleum use without removing arable 

land from food production. 

Results: Defeated 4 to 9. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Hastings (FL)—Nay; Matsui—Nay; Cardoza—Nay; Welch—Nay; Castor—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; 

Sutton—Nay; Dreier—Yea; Diaz-Balart—Yea; Hastings (WA)—Yea; 

Sessions—Yea; Slaughter—Nay. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.215 What does this subpart cover? ( a ) This subpart covers: ( 1 ) All HHS and DOI self-determination contracts, including construction contracts; and
( 2 ) All disputes regarding an awarding official's decision relating to a self-determination contract.
( b ) This subpart does not cover the decisions of an awarding official that are covered under subpart L.
### §1517. Order granting recognition

(a) Subject to section 1506, after notice and a hearing, an order recognizing a foreign proceeding shall be entered if—

(1) such foreign proceeding for which recognition is sought is a foreign main proceeding or foreign nonmain proceeding within the meaning of section 1502;

(2) the foreign representative applying for recognition is a person or body; and

(3) the petition meets the requirements of section 1515.

(b) Such foreign proceeding shall be recognized—

(1) as a foreign main proceeding if it is pending in the country where the debtor has the center of its main interests; or

(2) as a foreign nonmain proceeding if the debtor has an establishment within the meaning of section 1502 in the foreign country where the proceeding is pending.

(c) A petition for recognition of a foreign proceeding shall be decided upon at the earliest possible time. Entry of an order recognizing a foreign proceeding constitutes recognition under this chapter.

(d) The provisions of this subchapter do not prevent modification or termination of recognition if it is shown that the grounds for granting it were fully or partially lacking or have ceased to exist, but in considering such action the court shall give due weight to possible prejudice to parties that have relied upon the order granting recognition. A case under this chapter may be closed in the manner prescribed under section 350.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 139.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
October 2, 2015

Mr. Donald M. Shidler

599 County Road 235C

Rockdale, TX 76567

Dear Mr. Shidler:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

part 21; §§ 45.27(a), 45.29(3)(c) through (h), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.103, 91.119, and 91.121 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 25, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2802, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
# C_2006165EN.01001102.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-354/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2003/55/EC - Internal market in natural gas)

(2006/C 165/19)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Heller and B.Schima, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: S. Schreiner, acting as agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC (OJ L 176, p. 57)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 281 of 12.11.2005.

1

---
# C_2006244EN.01002602.xml

| 11.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/26

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4380 — EST/Dalmine)

(2006/C 244/14)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4380. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4380. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---