alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Leadership 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

## Contact Us

Office of Planning and Analytics
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-3395**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Associate Administrator for Planning and Analytics

## Anil "Neil" Chaudhry

Anil Chaudhry has over 20 years of progressive leadership experience in strategic planning, resource allocation, business operations, technology modernization, and federal program management in the defense, intelligence, and national security sectors.

Mr. Chaudhry is currently serving as the Associate Administrator for the Office of Planning and Analytics (AA OPA) at the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Mr. Chaudhry joined PHMSA as a career member of the Senior Executive Service after serving as a Fellow in the White House Leadership Development Program at the Office of the National Cyber Director in the Executive Office of the President.

Prior to his assignment at the White House, Mr. Chaudhry was the Director for Federal AI Implementations at the Federal AI Center of Excellence within the Technology Transformation Services (TTS) at the General Services Administration (GSA). In this role Mr. Chaudhry advised multiple federal Departments, Agencies, and entities on establishing mature data governance and management practices, developing innovative approaches for leveraging data as a strategic asset, and laying the foundation for advancing data discovery, access, and use through artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other emerging technologies. Mr. Chaudhry also served in critical leadership positions within US Customs and Border Protection, and as a Presidential Management Fellow at the Defense Business Transformation Agency. Prior to joining federal service, Mr. Chaudhry served as an enlisted soldier in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps and a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army Transportation Corps.

Mr. Chaudhry holds a J.D. in Labor Law, a M.S. in National Security Strategy, a M.S. in Management Information Systems, and a B.S. in Architectural Engineering. Mr. Chaudhry is a certified Project Management Professional and a Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Practitioner.

Mr. Chaudhry volunteers his time with non-profits that provide career opportunities to under-represented populations in technical fields such as robotics and data analytics. Mr. Chaudhry also serves as a mentor in various veteran focused organizations and causes. Mr. Chaudhry is an avid hiker, woodworker, and reader. Mr. Chaudhry is married and has three children in college, high school, and middle school.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 652 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 26, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2614) to amend the 
Small Business Investment Act to make improvements to the certified development 
company program, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 547.6 What are the minimum technical standards for enrolling and enabling Class II gaming system components? ( a ) *General requirements.* Class II gaming systems must provide a method to: ( 1 ) Enroll and unenroll Class II gaming system components;
( 2 ) Enable and disable specific Class II gaming system components.
( b ) *Specific requirements.* Class II gaming systems must: ( 1 ) Ensure that only enrolled and enabled Class II gaming system components participate in gaming; and
( 2 ) Ensure that the default condition for components must be unenrolled and disabled.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Sears Holdings Pension Plans 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Sears Holdings Pension Plans

### PBGC Begins Managing Benefits for Sears Holdings employees

If you are not currently receiving benefits, there is nothing for you to do at this time. If you are currently receiving benefits:
> - You will need to verify your personal information within 30 days of the date of the PBGC trusteeship letter you received. You can verify your information online via a MyPBA account or by returning the Payee Information Form you received with your Trusteeship Letter. 
- If you do not complete the verification questions through MyPBA or send the completed Payee Information Form within 30 days of your trusteeship letter, your benefit payments may be suspended.  We will notify you in writing prior to suspending your benefits. 
- You should now contact PBGC’s  Customer Contact Center  for any customer service needs. 

More information for Sears Participants is available in our Sears Questions and Answers webpage.

SEARS HOLDINGS PENSION PLAN 1

SEARS HOLDINGS PENSION PLAN 2

##           FAQ      

Questions and Answers for Participants in the Sears Holdings Corporation Pension Plans

General FAQs About PBGC

Summary Plan Descriptions

##           NEWS      

PBGC and Sears Reach an Agreement

PBGC to Pay Pension Benefits for Employees and Retirees at Sears and Kmart

PBGC Statement on Sears Bankruptcy Filing

PBGC, Sears Reach Agreement to Further Protect Pension Plans

PBGC, Sears Reach Agreement to Further Fund Pension Plans

PBGC, Sears Reach Agreement on Financial Protection for Pension Plan
-  Home 
-  Regulations 

# In This Section

                      -  PHMSA Rules 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 49 CFR Parts 100-199

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents here: https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The eCFR is also searchable by keyword and other available options on the eCFR website. To search and browse regulations using the eCFR website, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

Search the eCFR

# 

# Pagination

-  «« First 
-  ‹‹ Previous 
- …
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
-  10 
-  11 
-  12 
- …
-  ›Next › 
-  »Last »
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.3




GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY

4150 Sainte-Catherine Street West, Suite 525

Montreal, Quebec H3Z 2Y5

(T) (514) 288-8070, (F) (514) 288-8655




BY MAIL AND TELECOPIER




April 24, 2008




Louis-Philippe Senecal, Eng.

Project Manager

CASCADES ENGINEERING & PROJECTS INC.

465 Boul. Marie Victorin,

Kinglsey Falls, Quebec J0A 1B0




Re: Quote No. 1928, Budget B.



Dear Sir,




The following is in furtherance to the Budgetary Engineering Quotation submitted to Mr. Philip
Azimov of April 15th, 2008.



At this time we want to commence with the Phase I, Scope of Work, as is outlined in the proposal,
which includes the following requirements:




	 	•	 	Project management;

	 
	 	•	 	Drafting personnel in order to provide CAD documents of the pump;

	 
	 	•	 	The required fabrication services to build the prototypes required;

	 
	 	•	 	The proper testing facility in order to perform in house test, including proper
documentation and planning for UK coal dredging.






We ask that you please advise what you will need to start the project.



Yours truly,




GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY INC.




/s/ Ken Adessky




Per: Kenneth S. Adessky
### §1958. Compliance

The Secretary shall have the responsibility to assure compliance with the requirements of this chapter and section 1829b of this title and may delegate such responsibility to the appropriate bank supervisory agency, or other supervisory agency. The Secretary may rely on examinations conducted by a State supervisory agency of a category of financial institution, if the Secretary determines that the category of financial institution is required to comply with this chapter and section 1829b of this title (and regulations prescribed under this chapter and section 1829b of this title), or the State supervisory agency examines the category of financial institution for compliance with this chapter and section 1829b of this title (and regulations prescribed under this chapter and section 1829b of this title).

(Pub. L. 91–508, title I, §128, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1118; Pub. L. 113–156, §2(b), Aug. 8, 2014, 128 Stat. 1829.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–156 substituted "requirements of this chapter and section 1829b of this title" for "requirements of this chapter and sections 1730d and 1829b of this title" and inserted at end "The Secretary may rely on examinations conducted by a State supervisory agency of a category of financial institution, if the Secretary determines that the category of financial institution is required to comply with this chapter and section 1829b of this title (and regulations prescribed under this chapter and section 1829b of this title), or the State supervisory agency examines the category of financial institution for compliance with this chapter and section 1829b of this title (and regulations prescribed under this chapter and section 1829b of this title)."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of seventh calendar month which begins after Oct. 26, 1970, except that the Secretary of the Treasury may, by regulation, provide that this section be effective on any date not earlier than the publication of such regulations in the Federal Register and not later than first day of thirteenth calendar month which begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 401(a), (b) of Pub. L. 91–508, set out as a note under section 1951 of this title.

#### Consultation With State Agencies

Pub. L. 113–156, §2(c), Aug. 8, 2014, 128 Stat. 1830, provided that: "In issuing rules to carry out section 5318(a)(6) of title 31, United States Code, and section 128 of Public Law 91–508 (12 U.S.C. 1958), the Secretary of the Treasury shall consult with State supervisory agencies."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Task Force on Merit Review (MR), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of a meeting held by teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

# DATE AND TIME: 

March 8, 2011, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.

# SUBJECT MATTER: 

Discussion of Guiding Principles for Assessing Merit Review Criteria and Chairman's remarks.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# LOCATION: 

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Room 130, Stafford Place I, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230 will be available for the public to listen-in to this meeting held by teleconference. All visitors must contact the Board Office [call 703-292-7000 or send an e-mail message to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*] at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference and provide name and organizational affiliation. All visitors must report to the NSF visitor desk located in the lobby at the 9th and N. Stuart Streets entrance on the day of the teleconference to receive a visitor's badge.                    

# UPDATES AND POINT OF CONTACT: 

                        Please refer to the National Science Board Web site                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for additional information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.*                         Point of contact for this meeting is: Kim Silverman, National Science Board Office, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.                    

Daniel A. Lauretano,

Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-4685 Filed 2-25-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# C_2007042EN.01002401.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/24

---

Action brought on 4 December 2006 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-371/06)

(2007/C 42/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma, C. Schulze-Bahr, C. von Donat (lawyer))

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission Decision C(2006) 4193 final of 25 September 2006 on the reduction of the financial contribution of the ERDF under Objective 2 of the programme for North Rhine-Westphalia (ERFD No 97.02.13.005) awarded by Commission Decision No C(97) 1120 of 7 May 1997; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Decision C(2006) 4193 final of 25 September 2006 on the reduction of the financial contribution of the ERDF under Objective 2 of the programme for North Rhine-Westphalia (ERFD No 97.02.13.005) awarded by Commission Decision No C(97) 1120 of 7 May 1997;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the contested decision, the Commission reduced the contribution of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Objective 2 of the programme for Nordrhein-Westfalen.

In support of its claim, the applicant alleges breach of Article 24(2) of Regulation No 4253/88 (1), on the ground that the conditions for a reduction were not fulfilled. In this connection, it submits, in particular, that the deviations from the indicative financing plan do not amount to a significant alteration of the programme.

1

Even if the programme were significantly altered, the applicant submits that the Commission gave its prior consent pursuant to its ‘Guidelines for the financial closure of operational measures (1994-1999) under the Structural Funds’ (SEK (1999) 1316).

Assuming that the conditions for a reduction are met, the applicant submits that the defendant did not use its discretion in relation to the specific programme. According to the applicant, a reduction would not amount to a misuse of powers only if it appeared to be justified, as a whole, in the light of implementation of the programme and attainment of the objective. According to the applicant, as the defendant did not use this discretion, it also failed to provide justification.

Finally, the contested decision infringes the principle of sound administration, in that the applicant was forced by that decision to bring a new action against a decision pending before the courts at the time of bringing that action.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 of 19 December 1988, laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards coordination of the activities of the different Structural Funds between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments (OJ 1988 L 374, p. 1).

1

---
§ 700.141 General requirements—claims for relocation payments. ( a ) *Documentation.* Any claim for a relocation payment under subpart D, E, F, G, or H of this part shall be submitted to the Commission on the appropriate Commission form and supported by such documentation as may reasonably be required by the Commission to demonstrate expenses incurred, such as bills and receipts.
( b ) *Time for filing.* All claims for a relocation payment shall be filed with the Commission within sixty (60) days after the family occupies the replacement home unless this time period is extended by the Commission.
( c ) *Direct payment of claim.* Relocation payments shall be made in accordance with the terms of the Relocation Contracts and are not subject to claims of creditors or assignments.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 15, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00364-CV

RHONDA LOZANO, Appellant

V.

PAMELA BROOKS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1044289

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

According to information provided to this court, this appeal is from a final 

judgment signed April 28, 2014, in a forcible detainer action. Appellant Rhonda 

Lozano filed her notice of appeal on May 8, 2014. On May 12, 2014, the Harris

County Clerk filed a contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 20.1(e). After a hearing, on May 14, 2014, the trial court signed an order 

sustaining the contest and ordering appellant to pay all costs of the appeal. On May 

16, 2014, the Harris County Clerk filed a partial clerk’s record containing the 
2

documents concerning appellant’s indigency claim. Appellant did not seek review 

of the trial court’s ruling. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j). 

Accordingly, on June 3, 2014, this court ordered appellant to pay or make 

arrangements to pay for the complete clerk’s record in this appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 20.1(n)(2). This court’s order stated that unless appellant provided this 

court with proof of payment for the complete record within fifteen days of the date 

of its order, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 37.3(b). No complete clerk’s record has been filed. On July 1, 2014, the 

clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court 

appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

In addition, the appellate filing fee of $195.00 has not been paid. This court 

ordered appellant to pay the filing fee in the amount of $195.00 to the clerk of this 

court on or before June 18, 2014, or the appeal would be dismissed. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 5; 20.1(n)(1); 42.3(c). The filing fee has not been paid and appellant has 

not responded to this court’s order.

Therefore, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.203 If the contractor or contractor's employee receives a summons and/or a complaint alleging a tort covered by FTCA, what should the contractor do? As part of the notification required by 28 U.S.C. 2679(c), the contractor should immediately inform the Chief, Litigation Branch, Business and Administrative Law Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services, 330 Independence Avenue SW., Room 5362, Washington, DC 20201, and the contractor's tort claims liaison, and forward the following materials: ( a ) Four copies of the claimant's medical records of treatment, inpatient and outpatient, and any related correspondence, as well as reports of consultants;
( b ) A narrative summary of the care and treatment involved;
( c ) The names and addresses of all personnel who were involved in the care and treatment of the claimant;
( d ) Any comments or opinions that the employees who treated the claimant believe to be pertinent to the allegations contained in the claim; and
( e ) Other materials identified in § 900.188(c).