alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8305. Commemorative or special medals: facsimiles and ribbons

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Navy, members of the naval service may wear, in place of commemorative or special medals awarded to them, miniature facsimiles of such medals and ribbons symbolic of the awards.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 391, §6255; renumbered §8305, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(13), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6255 | 34 U.S.C. 358a. | Apr. 25, 1935, ch. 82, 49 Stat. 162. |

The words "members of the naval service may" are substituted for the words "That authority is hereby granted to personnel of the Navy and Marine Corps" for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8305, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 516; Aug. 21, 1957, Pub. L. 85–155, title III, §301(14), 71 Stat. 388; Nov. 8, 1967, Pub. L. 90–130, §1(27)(E), 81 Stat. 382, related to promotion of officers in regular grade of lieutenant colonel to grade of colonel, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §204, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2880, effective Sept. 15, 1981. See section 619 et seq. of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6255 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 11.7 Private collection agencies.

DHS will transfer delinquent DHS debts to the Treasury Department's Financial Management Service to obtain debt collection services provided by private collection agencies.
**EXHIBIT 34.3**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors Perpetual Trustee Company Limited: 

Wehave examined Management’s Assessment, included in the accompanying Management Assessment, that Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(ii),1122(d)(3)(iii) and 1122(d)(3)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for asset-backed securities transactions that are backed by auto finance receivables for which the Company serviced as issuer trustee (the Platform),as of and for the year ended March 31, 2016. The Company’s Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company because the Company does not perform activities with respect tothe Platform relating to those criteria. Appendix B to the Management Assessment identifies the individual trusts defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management’s Assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited tothe selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the year covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that mayhave affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion,Management’s Assessment that Perpetual Trustee Company Limited complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2016 is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ KPMG 

KPMG 

Sydney, Australia 

June 17, 2016
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Publications             
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeTopicsLost & Found

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
State Region Total Hours Total Costs Yr 1 State Hours Yr 2 State Hours Yr 3 State Hours Yr 1 State Costs Yr 2 State Costs Yr 3 State Costs State Region Total Hours Total Costs Tot

AZ 9 - $0 - - - - $ - $ - $ CT 1 - $0 CA 9 10,000 $651,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 $325,500 $162,750 $162,750 MA 1 - $0

CO 8 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 NJ 2 - $0 

CT 1 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 NY 2 - $0

DC 3 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 DC 3 - $0 

DE 3 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 DE 3 - $0

GA 4 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 MD 3 5,000 $325,500

IL 5 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 PA 3 - $0

LA 6 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 VA 3 - $0

MA 1 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 GA 4 - $0 

MD 3 5,000 $325,500 1,250 2,500 1,250 $162,750 $81,375 $81,375 NC 4 - $0

MI 5 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 SC 4 - $0

MO 7 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 IL 5 - $0 

NC 4 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 MI 5 - $0

NJ 2 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 LA 6 - $0 

NV 9 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 TX 6 5,000 $325,500

NY 2 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 MO 7 - $0 

PA 3 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 CO 8 - $0 SC 4 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 CA 9 10,000 $651,000 TX 6 5,000 $325,500 1,250 2,500 1,250 $162,750 $81,375 $81,375 AZ 9 - $0

VA 3 - $0 - - - $0 $0 $0 NV 9 - $0

20,000 $ 1,302,000 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $651,000 $325,500 $325,500 

Alternate Case-37.5, 37.5, 25%

Region Total Hours Total Costs Yr 1 EPA Hours Yr 2 EPA Hours Yr 3 EPA Hours Yr 1 EPA Costs Yr 2 EPA Costs Yr 3 EPA Costs Yr 1 EPA HoursYr 2 EPA Hours Yr 3 EPA Hours

1 - - 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0

2 - - 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0

3 5,000 325,500 250 125 125 $16,275 $8,138 $8,138 187.5 188 125

4 - - 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0

5 - - 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0

6 5,000 325,500 250 125 125 $16,275 $8,138 $8,138 187.5 188 125

7 - - 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0

8 - - 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0

9 10,000 651,000 500 250 250 $32,550 $16,275 $16,275 375 375 250

Subtotal 20,000 $ 1,302,000 1000 500 500 $65,100 $32,550 $32,550 750 750 500HQs 100 50 50 $6,510 $3,255 $3,255 75 75 50TOTAL 1100 550 550 $71,610 $35,805 $35,805 825 825 550Average Yearly Burden (Hours) Present value costs 2nd year rate 1.144900 3rd year rate 1.225043States 6,667 2nd year 3rd year Subtotal TotalEPA 733 States $ 372,665 $ 398,751 $ 771,416 $ 1,422,416Total 7,400 EPA $ 40,993 $ 43,863 $ 84,856 $ 156,466

Total $ 413,658 $ 442,614 $ 856,272 $ 1,578,882

Average Yearly Burden (Costs)States $434,000EPA $47,740Total $481,740Grand Total
# C_2006190EN.01003802.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/38

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 June 2006 — Colombani v Commission

(Case F-75/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 190/72)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following amicable settlement.

---

(1)  OJ C 229, 17.9.2005 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-294/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), We, Duane S. Jenson, President and Shelley Goff, Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

| *Date:*** | *11/03/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Duane S. Jenson***                      |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|---------------------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Duane S. Jenson, President and Director*** |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | * *                                    |
| *Date:*** | *11/03/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Shelley Goff***                         |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Shelley Goff, Secretary and Director***    |
# C_2007056EN.01001902.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Germany) lodged on 28 December 2006 — Heinz Huber v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-524/06)

(2007/C 56/34)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Heinz Huber

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Questions referred

Is the general processing of personal data of foreign citizens of the Union in a central register of foreign nationals compatible with

| (a) | the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality against citizens of the Union who exercise their right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (first paragraph of Article 12 EC in conjunction with Articles 17 EC and 18(1) EC), |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality against citizens of the Union who exercise their right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (first paragraph of Article 12 EC in conjunction with Articles 17 EC and 18(1) EC),

| (b) | the prohibition of restrictions on the freedom of establishment of nationals of a Member State in the territory of another Member State (first paragraph of Article 43 EC), |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the prohibition of restrictions on the freedom of establishment of nationals of a Member State in the territory of another Member State (first paragraph of Article 43 EC),

| (c) | the requirement of necessity under Article 7(e) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (1)? |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the requirement of necessity under Article 7(e) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (1)?

1

---

(1)   OJ L 281, 1995, p. 31.

1

---
### Liability on Debentures or Other Such Obligations
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 24, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291.
    1. Western State Agency, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan and 
Trust, Devils Lake, North Dakota, to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring over 25 percent of the voting shares of Western State Agency, 
and thereby indirectly acquire Western State Bank, both in Devils Lake, 
North Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 22, 
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-4288 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 83.25 Who will OFA notify when it begins review of a documented petition? OFA will notify the petitioner and those listed in § 83.22(d) when it begins review of a documented petition and will provide the petitioner and those listed in § 83.22(d) with: ( a ) The name, office address, and telephone number of the staff member with primary administrative responsibility for the petition;
( b ) The names of the researchers conducting the evaluation of the petition; and
( c ) The name of their supervisor.
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Fractographic and Microstructural Examination of a Ruptured DOT-3AL Specificati...                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Fractographic and Microstructural Examination of a Ruptured DOT-3AL Specification Compressed Gas Cylinder PDF                   

# Fractographic and Microstructural Examination of a Ruptured DOT-3AL Specification Compressed Gas Cylinder

**May 3, 1993**

The main purpose of this technical evaluation was to determine the cause of an aluminum cylinder failure in Wonderlake, TX

**Key Words**: SLC, sustain load crack, SCUBA, DOT 3AL cylinder, fractographic, ruptured cylinder, SEM analysis, ruptured DOT-3AL

----

If you have any **technical questions** not addressed by this or associated documents, contact Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 1 5 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00364

- CV

RHONDA LOZANO , Appellant

V.
PAMELA BROOKS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. 1044289

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
According to information provided to this court, t his appeal is from a final judgment signed April 28, 2014, in a forcible detainer action . Appellant Rhonda
Lozano filed h er notice of appeal on May 8, 2014

. On May 12
, 201 4, the Harris County Cle rk filed a contest to appellant ’ s affidavit of in digence

. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(e). After a hearing, on May 14, 2014, the trial court signed an order sustaining the contest and ordering appellant to pay all costs of the appeal. O n May 16, 2014, the Harris County Clerk filed a partial clerk’ s record containing the2

docum ents concerning appellant’s indigency claim. Appellant did not seek review of the trial court’s ruling. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j).
Accordingly, on June 3, 2014, t his court ordered appellant to p ay or make arrangements to pay for the complete clerk’s record in this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(n)(2). This court’s order stated that unless appellant provided this court with proof of payment for the complete record within fifteen days of the date
of its order, the a ppeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No complete clerk’s record has been filed. On July 1, 2014, t he clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal inf ormed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.
In addition, t he appellate filing fee of $195.00 has not been paid. This court
ordered a ppellant to pay the filing fee in the amount of $195.00 to the c lerk of this

court on or be fore June 18, 2014 , or the appeal would be dismissed

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 ; 20.1(n)(1) ; 42.3(c). The filing fee has not been paid and appellant has not responded to this court’s order

.
T he refore, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consist s of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
Exhibit 99.6
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Crescent Point Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Saxberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:           March 12, 2014                                              CRESCENT POINT ENERGY CORP.
  /s/ Scott Saxberg___________________
 Name:           Scott Saxberg
 Title:           President and Chief Executive Officer
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-27 

December 13, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(13) Plans Covered. Professional Service Employer Plans

4021(c)(2)(A) Plans Covered. Definition of Professional Service Employer

4021(c)(2)(B) Plans Covered. Definition of Professional Individuals 

OPINION: 

 We have received a letter, forms, and a check you forwarded to this Corporation on November 25, 1974. 

In your letter, you state that you should be excluded from the coverage of Title IV because you are a "professional

service employer" within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act § 4021(b)(13). You have asked

whether we agree with your position. 

Unfortunately, we are not able to conclude that you are a "professional service employer" on the basis of the

information contained in your letter. The statute does not explain what is meant by "professional individuals" but it does

list a series of occupations which it states are included within that definition. None of the services referred to in your

letter are performed by persons engaged in the occupations specified in the statute, nor does your letter contain reasons

why the occupations referred to in your letter should be considered professional within the meaning of § 4021(c)(2)(B).

In addition, the statute [*2] requires that a professional service employer be owned or controlled by professional

individuals and that the principal business of the employer be to perform a professional service. Again, we are unable

to determine, on the basis of your letter, whether "professional individuals" own or control * * * or what facts underlie

the conclusion that your services are "completely professional." 

Should you wish to pursue this matter further, we suggest that you supply additional information and reasons which

would enable us to reach a determination. For your convenience, we have attached a copy of § 4021 of the Act. 

George B. Driesen 

Deputy General Counsel
-  Home 
-  Pipeline Field Operations 
-  Drug and Alcohol 

# In This Section

                      -  Field Operations Overview 
                      -  Effort Allocation                          -  Overview 
                        -  Federal Effort 
                        -  State Effort 
                      -  Drug and Alcohol                          -  Overview 
                        -  Drug and Alcohol Inspection Forms 
                        -  Drug and Alcohol Regulations 
                        -  Guidance 
                        -  Management Information System (MIS) 
                      -  Investigations 

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Fax:**202-366-4566****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Drug and Alcohol Regulations

49 CFR Part 199 (PHMSA drug and alcohol testing regulation) and 49 CFR Part 40 (DOT drug and alcohol testing regulation) require operators to conduct drug and alcohol testing of covered employees who perform operation, maintenance, or emergency-response functions regulated by 49 CFR Parts 192, 193, or 195.

49 CFR Part 199 (PHMSA Regulation)

49 CFR Part 40 (DOT Regulation)