alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 39.119 When must a student leave a gifted and talented program? A student must leave the gifted and talented program when either: ( a ) The student has received all of the available services that can meet the student's needs;
( b ) The student no longer meets the criteria that have qualified him or her for the program; or
( c ) The parent or guardian removes the student from the program.
#### Bernard Roesler, Respondent, v. George B. Shilling, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, .Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1779

DOYLE R. HAM, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; 

DAYENA CORCOREN; JOHN WOLFE; JOHN LOTTICH; GARY MAYNARD; 

PAULA GREEN-HOLT; CYNTHIA BRISCOE; BRUCE CHAPMAN; BRENDA 

SHELL-ELEAZER; RODNEY BURGER; MARGARET CHIPPENDALE; BRIAN 

KAUFFMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. 

(1:13-cv-03501-JKB)

Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Doyle R. Ham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Judith Ann Barr, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Doyle R. Ham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. 

Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. 1:13-cv-03501-JKB (D. 

Md. filed July 10, 2014 & entered July 11, 2014). We also deny 

Ham’s motion for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2014088EN.01003001.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/30

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014

2014/C 88/19

On page 12, the text referring to the State Aid No SA.37391 is cancelled and replaced by the following:

‘Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 18.11.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37391 (2013/N) |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Prolongation of RDP measure ‘Natura 2000 payments (to forest owners)’ |
| Legal basis | Ministru kabineta noteikumu projekts “Noteikumi par valsts un Eiropas Savienības lauku attīstības atbalsta piešķiršanu, administrēšanu un uzraudzību vides un lauku ainavas uzlabošanai” |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Payments Natura 2000 and payments linked to the Directive 2000/60/EC |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | — |
| Intensity | 0 % |
| Duration (period) | 1.1.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Economic sectors | AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Lauku atbalsta dienests |
| Republikas laukums 2 LV-1981 |

Date of adoption of the decision

18.11.2013

Aid number

SA.37391 (2013/N)

Member State

Latvia

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Prolongation of RDP measure ‘Natura 2000 payments (to forest owners)’

Legal basis

Ministru kabineta noteikumu projekts “Noteikumi par valsts un Eiropas Savienības lauku attīstības atbalsta piešķiršanu, administrēšanu un uzraudzību vides un lauku ainavas uzlabošanai”

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Payments Natura 2000 and payments linked to the Directive 2000/60/EC

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

—

Intensity

0 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2014-31.12.2014

Economic sectors

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING

Name and address of the granting authority

Lauku atbalsta dienests

Republikas laukums 2 LV-1981

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm’

---
§ 162.011 How does a prospective lessee identify and contact individual Indian landowners to negotiate a lease? ( a ) Prospective lessees may submit a written request to us to obtain the following information. The request must specify that it is for the purpose of negotiating a lease: ( 1 ) Names and addresses of the individual Indian landowners or their representatives;
( 2 ) Information on the location of the parcel; and
( 3 ) The percentage of undivided interest owned by each individual Indian landowner.
( b ) We may assist prospective lessees in contacting the individual Indian landowners or their representatives for the purpose of negotiating a lease, upon request.
( c ) We will assist individual Indian landowners in lease negotiations, upon their request.
§ 158.524 Initial service period. ( a ) All individuals appointed under this part serve an initial service period that constitutes a probationary period of three years beginning on the date of appointment.
( b ) Except as stated in paragraph (c) of this section, service in the DHS-CS counts toward completion of a current initial service period under paragraph (a) of this section. No other service in an appointment made outside the authority of this part may count toward completion of an initial service period under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Service as a DHS-CS advisory appointee, as a reemployed annuitant described in § 158.523(a)(1), or providing uncompensated service described in § 158.523(a)(2) does not count towards completion of an initial service period in a subsequent appointment to a qualified position.
( d ) CTMS policy implementing this section addresses computation of each DHS-CS employee's initial service period, including accounting for working schedules other than full-time schedules described in § 158.705 and for periods of absence while in pay and nonpay statuses.
§ 48.106 May a lessee construct permanent improvements under a lease? ( a ) The lessee may construct permanent improvements under a lease of a Bureau-operated facility only if the lease contains the following provisions: ( 1 ) A description of the type and location of any permanent improvements to be constructed by the lessee and a general schedule for construction of the permanent improvements, including dates for commencement and completion of construction;
( 2 ) Specification of who owns the permanent improvements the lessee constructs during the lease term and specifies whether each specific permanent improvement the lessee constructs will: ( i ) Remain on the leased premises, upon the expiration, cancellation, or termination of the lease, in a condition satisfactory to the Director, and become the property of the Bureau-operated school;
( ii ) Be removed within a time period specified in the lease, at the lessee's expense, with the leased premises to be restored as closely as possible to their condition before construction of the permanent improvements; or
( iii ) Be disposed of by other specified means.
( 3 ) Due diligence requirements that require the lessee to complete construction of any permanent improvements within the schedule specified in the lease or general schedule of construction, and a process for changing the schedule by mutual consent of the parties. ( i ) If construction does not occur, or is not expected to be completed, within the time period specified in the lease, the lessee must provide the Director with an explanation of good cause as to the nature of any delay, the anticipated date of construction of facilities, and evidence of progress toward commencement of construction.
( ii ) Failure of the lessee to comply with the due diligence requirements of the lease is a violation of the lease and may lead to cancellation of the lease.
( b ) The lessee must prepare the required information and analyses, including information to facilitate the Bureau's analysis under applicable environmental and cultural resource requirements.
( c ) The Bureau may take appropriate enforcement action to ensure removal of the permanent improvements and restoration of the premises at the lessee's expense before or after expiration, termination, or cancellation of the lease. The Bureau may collect and hold the performance bond or alternative form of security until removal and restoration are completed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Policy 
-  Statements 
-  Director Hartogensis Statement On PBGC Procurement Depart... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Director Hartogensis Statement on PBGC Procurement Department Oversight

May 4, 2020

PBGC Director Gordon Hartogensis today issued the following statement on news that former PBGC Director of Procurement Jeffrey Donahue pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to bribe a public official:

“Fraud, abuse, and any other illegal and unethical behaviors have no place in the federal government’s operations. They are unacceptable in any case — but especially when they involve the hard-earned dollars of the workers and retirees PBGC protects. I am committed to making sure the agency’s employees and contractors operate responsibly, transparently, and in accordance with the law, which is why I requested a full investigation into our procurement department and its oversight. We will continue working with the Inspector General’s office to uphold the high standards we’ve set for ourselves since my confirmation and to ethically and effectively carry out PBGC’s critical mission.”

Additional details on the actions that took place in 2015 and 2016 are available in this Department of Justice press release: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/government-official-and-contracting-executive-plead-guilty-bribery-conspiracy.

**About PBGC:**

PBGC protects the retirement security of over 35 million American workers, retirees, and beneficiaries in both single-employer and multiemployer private-sector pension plans. The agency’s two insurance programs are legally separate and operationally and financially independent. PBGC is currently responsible for the benefits of about 1.5 million people in failed pension plans and receives no taxpayer dollars. The Single-Employer Insurance Program is financed by insurance premiums, investment income, and assets and recoveries from failed single-employer plans. The Multiemployer Insurance Program is financed by insurance premiums and investment income. For more information, visit  PBGC.gov.
#### JOHNNY BERNARD LEE *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Decided June 23, 2004

*James M. Fox,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Nancy L. Chupak,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Johnny Bernard Lee’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 905 (AC 23886), is denied.
§ 37.13 Document verification requirements. ( a ) States shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the applicant does not have more than one driver's license or identification card already issued by that State under a different identity. In States where an individual is permitted to hold both a driver's license and identification card, the State shall ensure that the individual has not been issued identification documents in multiple or different names. States shall also comply with the provisions of § 37.29 before issuing a driver's license or identification card.
( b ) States must verify the documents and information required under § 37.11 with the issuer of the document. States shall use systems for electronic validation of document and identity data as they become available or use alternative methods approved by DHS. ( 1 ) States shall verify any document described in § 37.11(c) or (g) and issued by DHS (including, but not limited to, the I-94 form described in § 37.11(c)(vi)) through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system or alternate methods approved by DHS, except that if two DHS-issued documents are presented, a SAVE verification of one document that confirms lawful status does not need to be repeated for the second document. In the event of a non-match, the DMV must not issue a REAL ID driver's license or identification card to an applicant, and must refer the individual to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for resolution.
( 2 ) States must verify SSNs with the Social Security Administration (SSA) or through another method approved by DHS. In the event of a non-match with SSA, a State may use existing procedures to resolve non-matches. If the State is unable to resolve the non-match, and the use of an exceptions process is not warranted in the situation, the DMV must not issue a REAL ID driver's license or identification card to an applicant until the information verifies with SSA.
( 3 ) States must verify birth certificates presented by applicants. States should use the Electronic Verification of Vital Events (EVVE) system or other electronic systems whenever the records are available. If the document does not appear authentic upon inspection or the data does not match and the use of an exceptions process is not warranted in the situation, the State must not issue a REAL ID driver's license or identification card to the applicant until the information verifies, and should refer the individual to the issuing office for resolution.
( 4 ) States shall verify documents issued by the Department of State with the Department of State or through methods approved by DHS.
( 5 ) States must verify REAL ID driver's licenses and identification cards with the State of issuance.
( 6 ) Nothing in this section precludes a State from issuing an interim license or a license issued under § 37.71 that will not be accepted for official purposes to allow the individual to resolve any non-match.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bio-One Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date:    August 18, 2004                      By:      /s/ Armand Dauplaise
                                                       -----------------------
                                              Name:    Armand Dauplaise
                                              Title:   Chief Executive Officer
                                                       and President


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio-One Corporation and
will be retained by Bio-One Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 115.95 Additional provisions in agency policies.

The regulations in this subpart A establish minimum requirements for agencies and facilities. Agency and facility policies may include additional requirements.
§ 514.11 Can a proposed late fee be appealed? ( a ) Proposed late fees assessed by the Chair may be appealed under subchapter H of this chapter.
( b ) At any time prior to the filing of a notice of appeal under subchapter H of this chapter, the Chair and the recipient may agree to settle the notice of late submission, including the amount of the proposed late fee. In the event a settlement is reached, a settlement agreement shall be prepared and executed by the Chair and the recipient. If a settlement agreement is executed, the recipient shall be deemed to have waived all rights to further review of the notice or late fee in question, except as otherwise provided expressly in the settlement agreement. In the absence of a settlement of the issues under this paragraph (b), the recipient may contest the proposed late fee before the Commission in accordance with subchapter H of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-1999
<CASH>                                             710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (842)
<INVENTORY>                                     19,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,723
<PP&E>                                          85,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                (52,286)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (15,963)
<BONDS>                                      (115,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         (32,438)
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (63,535)
<OTHER-SE>                                         865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (163,621)
<SALES>                                       (27,169)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (27,169)
<CGS>                                           14,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (30)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                281
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       281
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(logo) pwc

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Management of

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security Transactions – RegAB Portfolio (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i) (C) & (D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Exhibit C to management's assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 7, 2016

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017

T: (646) 471 3000, F: (646) 471 8320, www.pwc.com/us