alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-149 

July 6, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(2) Plans Covered. Government Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request that we make a determination whether the * * * Pension Plan is covered under

Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). 

After reviewing the materials provided with your letter, we contacted * * * who had submitted the materials to you.

He has informed us that the Plan is one to which the Railroad Retirement Act of 1935 applies and that it is financed by

contributions required under that Act. Such a plan is excluded from Title IV coverage pursuant to Section 4021(b)(2)

of ERISA. 

Matthew M. Lind 

Acting Executive Director
§ 558.3 Notification to NIGC of license decisions and retention obligations. ( a ) After a tribe has provided a notice of results of the background check to the Commission, a tribe may license a primary management official or key employee.
( b ) Within 30 days after the issuance of the license, a tribe shall notify the Commission of its issuance.
( c ) A key employee or primary management official who does not have a license after ninety (90) days shall not be permitted to perform the duties, functions, and/or responsibilities of a key employee or primary management official until so licensed.
( d ) If a tribe does not license an applicant— ( 1 ) The tribe shall notify the Commission; and
( 2 ) Shall forward copies of its eligibility determination and notice of results, under § 556.6(b)(2) of this chapter, to the Commission for inclusion in the Indian Gaming Individuals Record System.
( e ) If a tribe revokes a key employee or primary management official's license— ( 1 ) The tribe shall notify the Commission; and
( 2 ) Shall forward copies of its license revocation decision for inclusion in the Indian Gaming Individuals Record System.
( f ) A tribe shall retain the following for inspection by the Chair or their designee for no less than three years from the date of termination of employment: ( 1 ) The information listed under § 556.4(a)(1) through (14) of this chapter;
( 2 ) Investigative reports, as defined in § 556.6(b) of this chapter;
( 3 ) Eligibility determinations, as defined in § 556.5 of this chapter;
( 4 ) Privacy Act notice, as defined in § 556.2 of this chapter; and
( 5 ) False Statement notice, as defined in § 556.3 of this chapter.
[88 FR 55371, Aug. 15, 2023]
-  Home 
-  106 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 106.100

## Section §106.100: Required information for a petition for rulemaking

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 106.100 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.30 When the Secretary declines all or a portion of a proposal, is the Secretary required to provide an Indian tribe or tribal organization with technical assistance?

Yes. The Secretary shall provide additional technical assistance to overcome the stated objections, in accordance with section 102(b) of the Act, and shall provide any necessary requested technical assistance to develop any modifications to overcome the Secretary's stated objections.
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# PD-37(R): New York City permit requirements for transportation of certain hazardous materials
# C_2006310EN.01002802.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/28

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 October 2006 — Self Service de Bleek v Commission

(Case T-275/99) (1)

1

(2006/C 310/53)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 47, 19.2.2000.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.184 Is there a deadline for filing FTCA claims?

Yes. Claims shall be filed within 2 years of the date of accrual. (28 U.S.C. 2401).
# C_2006165EN.01002402.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/24

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 May 2006 — Kallianos v Commission

(Case T-93/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Deductions from salary - Maintenance payments in divorce proceedings - Enforcement of a judgment of a national court)

(2006/C 165/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Theodoros Kallianos (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: G. Archambeau, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision relating to some of the deductions from the applicant's pay pursuant to interim measures ordered by a Belgian court, for reimbursement of those sums and for the payment of damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.04.2004.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the March
31, 2000 unaudited financial statements of the Company and is qualified in its
entirety by such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,804
<PP&E>                                         130,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,586
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,898,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          405,108
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,567,713
<COMMON>                                        10,684
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,887,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,898,139
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               685,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (737,424)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (369,764)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,107,188)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)



</TABLE>
# C_2014068EN.01000301.xml

| 7.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/3

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2014/C 68/03

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 89, at the Explanatory note to CN subheading ‘2104 20 00 Homogenised composite food preparations’, is replaced by the following:

2104 20 00 Homogenised composite food preparations

| ‘2104 20 00 | Homogenised composite food preparations

  The expression “homogenised composite food preparations” is defined in note 3 to this chapter.
  The phrase “Such preparations may contain a small quantity of visible pieces of ingredients.” in note 3 to Chapter 21 does not imply that there is a fixed limit in percentage by weight or size for those visible pieces in order for the product to be covered by subheading 2104 20. The concept of “a small quantity of visible pieces of ingredients” is to be interpreted on the basis of the objective characteristics of the product: it has to be assessed whether the visible pieces have been added in such a quantity that they constitute a considerable volume of the product. If so, the product would have to be classified elsewhere (e.g. under heading 2005) as the product would have lost the character of a homogenised composite food preparation.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2104 20 00

Homogenised composite food preparations

The expression “homogenised composite food preparations” is defined in note 3 to this chapter.

The phrase “Such preparations may contain a small quantity of visible pieces of ingredients.” in note 3 to Chapter 21 does not imply that there is a fixed limit in percentage by weight or size for those visible pieces in order for the product to be covered by subheading 2104 20. The concept of “a small quantity of visible pieces of ingredients” is to be interpreted on the basis of the objective characteristics of the product: it has to be assessed whether the visible pieces have been added in such a quantity that they constitute a considerable volume of the product. If so, the product would have to be classified elsewhere (e.g. under heading 2005) as the product would have lost the character of a homogenised composite food preparation.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
#### Rose M. Eason *v.*Earl I. Williams, Executor (Estate of John H. Carter), et al.

*Morris Melnick,*for the appellee (named defendant).

*Howard A. Jacobs,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued April 2

decided April 2, 1974

The motion by the named defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is denied.
#### § 584.4 Are motions permitted?

Yes. Motions to intervene under § 584.5 are permitted. Motions for an extension of time that are filed before the appointment of a presiding official shall be decided by the Commission. All other motions may be scheduled and heard at the discretion of the presiding official.
[Exhibit 99.3]

                           CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert L. Jones, Jr., Chairman/CEO, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on
the Company.



By: /s/ Robert L. Jones,
Chairman/CEO
-------------------------------


June 24, 2003
#### § 39.112 What is the limit on the number of students who are gifted and talented?

There is no limit on the number of students that a school can classify as gifted and talented.
#### § 2.815 What information will the Decision on my Objection to the Statement of Performance contain?

The Decision on your Objection to the Statement of Performance will contain an explanation as to whether the decision-maker agrees or disagrees with your Objection to the Statement of Performance. If the decision-maker agrees with your Objection to the Statement of Performance, a correction will be made and reflected on your Statement of Performance. If the decision-maker disagrees with your Objection to the Statement of Performance, the Decision will provide information about your right to appeal the Decision.
#### § 75.17 Relinquishment of membership.

Any member of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians may relinquish his membership in the Band by filing notice in writing that he no longer desires to be enrolled as a member of the Band. On receipt of such notice the name of the members shall be stricken from the roll and he shall no longer be considered as a member of the Band and shall not be entitled to share in any use or in any distribution of tribal assets which may be made in the future to the enrolled members of the Band.
#### § 179.202 May the holder of a life estate without regard to waste deplete the resources?

Yes. The holder of a life estate without regard to waste may cause lawful depletion or benefit from the lawful depletion of the resources. However, a holder of a life estate without regard to waste may not cause or allow damage to the trust property through culpable negligence or an affirmative act of malicious destruction that causes damage to the prejudice of the holders of remainder interests.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Benefits 
-  Effect On PBGC Benefits of The Supreme Court's Decision O... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Effect on PBGC Benefits of the Supreme Court's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage

On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional. Section 3 of DOMA provided that, in interpreting any federal law, a "marriage" was limited to "a legal union of one man and one woman as husband and wife" and a "spouse" was only "a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife." As a result of the Supreme Court's decision, these definitions are no longer a factor in PBGC's benefit determinations.

PBGC's longstanding policy is to determine a person's marital status by looking to the laws of the "place of celebration" — meaning that so long as a marriage was valid where it took place, it is valid for PBGC purposes. Therefore, PBGC will treat you as married if your marriage was valid where it occurred, regardless of the laws of the state in which you now live. This rule applies to both opposite-sex and same-sex marriages.

If you are the spouse of a participant in a pension plan, you are generally entitled to survivor benefits unless you waive them in writing. These include a qualified preretirement survivor annuity (QPSA) and a benefit under a Qualified Joint and Survivor Annuity (QJSA). Also, a divorced spouse may be eligible to obtain a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), giving a portion of the participant's benefit to that former spouse. See the Glossary for further details.

If you have questions on how the rules apply in your specific situation, please call PBGC's customer contact center at 1-800-400-7242 for more information.

September 11, 2020

##           Contact Us      

Visit our Contact Us page for more information.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form10-Q") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 5, 2009             /s/ Yaron Meerfeld
                                  ------------------------
                                  Yaron Meerfeld, Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: August 5, 2009             /s/ Tzlil Peker
                                  ---------------------
                                  Tzlil Peker, Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****CumulativeList of Organizations described in Section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Codeof 1986**** 
SuDocNumber:T22.2/11:
ItemNumber:0956(online)
CGPSystem Number:000637089
 
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011**
§ 36.111 Can a tribe, tribal governing body, or local school board waive the homeliving standards? A tribal governing body or local school board may waive some or all of the standards established by this part if the body or board determines that the standards are inappropriate for the needs of the tribe's students. ( a ) If a tribal governing body or school board waives standards under this section, it must, within 60 days, submit proposed alternative standards to the Director, BIE.
( b ) Within 90 days of receiving a waiver and proposal under paragraph (a) of this section, the Director must either: ( 1 ) Approve the submission; or
( 2 ) Deliver to the governing body or school board a written explanation of the good cause for rejecting the submission.
( c ) If the Director rejects a submission under paragraph (c) of this section, the governing body or school board may submit another waiver and proposal for approval. The standards in this part remain in effect until the Director approves alternative standards.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-94 

December 23, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 208 Mergers, Consolidations and other Transfers of Plan Assets 

OPINION: 

We are currently developing regulations dealing with the application of ERISA, Sections 208, 1015 and 1021,

involving multiemployer plans. It was our understanding that PBGC regulations on the subject would govern mergers

of single employer plans into multiemployer plans. However, it appears that there is some doubt as to whether PBGC's

regulations will govern the benefit equivalence as to employees who remain in the single employer plan after a transfer

of part of the assets and some of the participants to a multiemployer plan. This doubt arises from question three of TIR

1408 (enclosed) and the last sentence of the third paragraph of PBGC news release 76-12, dated October 29, 1975

(enclosed). We are inclined to think that the PBGC rules should control in such a case, particularly because the PBGC

has a financial interest in whether the plans' assets are sufficient to provide the promised benefits. 

We would appreciate your views and comments. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel