NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: HILDY JEAN ORTIZ; MARCUS ALONZO NIETO, Debtors, JAMES PATRICK CHANDLER, Appellant,
v. JAN P. JOHNSON, Chapter 13 Trustee; HILDY JEAN ORTIZ; MARCUS ALONZO NIETO; UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Appellees. No. 13-60011 BAP No. 11-1643
MEMORANDUM *

In re: HARVEY P. MICKELSEN; STEPHANIE B. MICKELSEN, Debtors, JAMES PATRICK CHANDLER, No. 13-60012 BAP No. 12-1017 

# FILED
MAY 06 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.page 2 Appellant,
v. JAN P. JOHNSON, Chapter 13 Trustee; UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Sacramento, Appellees.
In re: BEN LEANDO DYE; KAELYN MARIE DYE, Debtors, JAMES PATRICK CHANDLER, Appellant,
v. JAN P. JOHNSON; BEN LEANDO DYE; KAELYN MARIE DYE, Appellees., SEAN GJERDE. No. 13-60013 BAP No. 12-1016

In re: HARVEY P. MICKELSEN; STEPHANIE B. MICKELSEN, Debtors, No. 13-60014 BAP No. 12-1019page 3 JAMES PATRICK CHANDLER, Appellant,
v. JAN P. JOHNSON, Chapter 13 Trustee; UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Sacramento, Appellees.
In re: BEN LEANDO DYE; KAELYN MARIE DYE, Debtors, JAMES PATRICK CHANDLER, Appellant,
v. JAN P. JOHNSON; BEN LEANDO DYE; KAELYN MARIE DYE, Appellees., SEAN GJERDE. No. 13-60015 BAP No. 11-1641

In re: HARVEY P. MICKELSEN; STEPHANIE B. MICKELSEN, No. 13-60016page 4 Debtors, JAMES PATRICK CHANDLER, Appellant,
v. JAN P. JOHNSON, Chapter 13 Trustee; UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Sacramento, Appellees. BAP No. 12-1018

In re: HILDY JEAN ORTIZ; MARCUS ALONZO NIETO, Debtors, JAMES PATRICK CHANDLER, Appellant,
v. JAN P. JOHNSON, Chapter 13 Trustee; HILDY JEAN ORTIZ; MARCUS ALONZO NIETO; UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Appellees. No. 13-60017 BAP No. 12-1015page 5 Appeals from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Kirscher, Dunn and Jury, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Submitted April 16, 2015 **

San Francisco, California Before: KOZINSKI and GRABER , Circuit Judges and BENSON , *** Senior District Judge. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel correc tly dismissed Chandler’s appeals of the bankruptcy court’s entry of a default judgment of contempt against him. Chandler was clearly apprised of the contempt proceedings and the bankruptcy court’s entry of a default judgment of c ontempt. However, he didn’t move the bankruptcy court to set aside the entry of the default judgment or for relief from the default judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), 60(b). An appeal “‘cannot be used as a substitute’ for these procedures.” Consorzio Del Prosciutto Di Parma v. Domain Name Clearing Co. , 346 F.3d 1193, 1195 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting Rohauerv. Friedman , 306 F.2d 933, 937 (9th Cir. 1962)); see also In re Lam , 192 F.3d 1309, 1311 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (“[A] party may not challenge the entry of

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dee V. Benson, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, sitting by designation.page 6 default in the first instance in an appellate court; rather, a party must first file an appropriate motion in the court wh ere the default was entered.”).
AFFIRMED.