11202 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices 

1 In comments made on the interim final sunset 

regulations, a number of parties stated that the 

proposed five-day period for rebuttals to 

substantive responses to a notice of initiation was 

insufficient. This requirement was retained in the 

final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As 

provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the 

Department will consider individual requests to 

extend that five-day deadline based upon a showing 

of good cause. 

February 23, 2011. 

Gregory Campbell, 

Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement 

Office. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4517 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating a five-year 

review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the 

antidumping duty orders and 

suspended investigation listed below. 

The International Trade Commission 

(‘‘the Commission’’) is publishing 

concurrently with this notice its notice 

of Institution of Five-Year Review which 

covers the same orders. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Department official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

For information from the Commission 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission at (202) 205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 

13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 

62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to the Department’s conduct of 

Sunset Reviews is set forth in the 

Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3 

—Policies Regarding the Conduct of 

Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders: Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 

(April 16, 1998). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset 

Review of the following antidumping 

duty orders and suspended 

investigation: 

DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Department contact 

A–427–602 ........... 731–TA–313 ...... France ................ Brass Sheet & Strip (3rd Review) .................. David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–428–602 ........... 731–TA–317 ...... Germany ............ Brass Sheet & Strip (3rd Review) .................. David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–475–601 ........... 731–TA–314 ...... Italy .................... Brass Sheet & Strip (3rd Review) .................. David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–588–704 ........... 731–TA–379 ...... Japan ................. Brass Sheet & Strip (3rd Review) .................. David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–580–839 ........... 731–TA–825 ...... South Korea ....... Polyester Staple Fiber (2nd Review) .............. Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391. 

A–583–833 ........... 731–TA–826 ...... Taiwan ............... Polyester Staple Fiber (2nd Review) .............. Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391. 

A–821–811 ........... 731–TA–856 ...... Russia ................ Ammonium Nitrate (2nd Review) .................... Sally Gannon (202) 482–0162. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to Sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statue and Department’s 

regulations, the Department schedule 

for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on the Department’s Internet 

Web site at the following address: 

‘‘http://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.’’ All 

submissions in these Sunset Reviews 

must be filed in accordance with the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

format, translation, service, and 

certification of documents. These rules 

can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103 (d), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties to apply for access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately 

following publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

The Department’s regulations on 

submission of proprietary information 

and eligibility to receive access to 

business proprietary information under 

APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304– 

306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties defined in 

section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b) wishing 

to participate in a Sunset Review must 

respond not later than 15 days after the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

The required contents of the notice of 

intent to participate are set forth at 19 

CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance 

with the Department’s regulations, if we 

do not receive a notice of intent to 

participate from at least one domestic 

interested party by the 15-day deadline, 

the Department will automatically 

revoke the order without further review. 

See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in the Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Please consult the 

Department’s regulations for 

information regarding the Department’s 

conduct of Sunset Reviews.1 Please 

consult the Department’s regulations at 

19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms 

and for other general information 

concerning antidumping and 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices 11203 

countervailing duty proceedings at the 

Department. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). 

Date: February 18, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4520 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–886] 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

interested parties, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC) with respect to Dongguan Nozawa 

Plastics Products Co., Ltd., and United 

Power Packaging, Ltd. (collectively 

Nozawa). The period of review is 

August 1, 2009, through July 31, 2010. 

The Department is rescinding the 

administrative review. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1757 or (202) 482– 

1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 9, 2004, we published in 

the Federal Register an antidumping 

duty order on PRCBs from the PRC. See 

Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene 

Retail Carrier Bags From the People’s 

Republic of China, 69 FR 48201 (August 

9, 2004). On August 2, 2010, we 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on PRCBs from 

the PRC. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 75 

FR 45094 (August 2, 2010). On August 

31, 2010, pursuant to section 751(a) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b), the 

petitioner, the Polyethylene Retail 

Carrier Bag Committee and its 

individual members, Hilex Poly Co., 

LLC, and Superbag Corporation, 

requested an administrative review of 

the order with respect to Nozawa, an 

exporter of PRCBs from the PRC. On 

September 29, 2010, in accordance with 

section 751(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we published a notice 

of initiation of an administrative review 

of the order. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 60076 

(September 29, 2010). 

Rescission of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), the Department will 

rescind an administrative review, ‘‘in 

whole or in part, if a party that 

requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of notice of initiation of the 

requested review.’’ We received a notice 

of withdrawal from the petitioner with 

respect to the review requested of 

Nozawa within the 90-day time limit. 

See letter from the petitioner dated 

December 22, 2010. Because we 

received no other requests for review of 

Nozawa and no other requests for the 

review of the order on PRCBs from the 

PRC with respect to other companies 

subject to the order, we are rescinding 

the administrative review of the order in 

full. This rescission is in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions to 

CBP 15 days after publication of this 

notice. 

Notification to Importer 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: February 17, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4508 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Water Technology Trade Mission to 

India 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

Mission Description 

The United States Department of 

Commerce, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. and Foreign 

Commercial Service (CS), is organizing 

a Water Technology Trade Mission to 

India from February 28 to March 4, 

2011. The purpose of the mission is to 

expose U.S. firms to India’s rapidly 

expanding water and waste water 

market and to assist U.S. companies to 

seize export opportunities in this sector. 

The trade mission participants will be 

comprised of representatives from 

leading U.S. companies that provide 

state-of-the-art water and waste water 

technologies ranging from hydropower 

and desalination plants to appliances 

and purification systems. The mission 

will visit two cities: Bangalore and 

Mumbai, where participants will receive 

market briefings and meet with key 

government decisions makers and 

prospective private sector partners on a 

one-on-one basis. During the Mumbai 

portion of the mission delegates will use 

Aquatech India 2011, a leading 

international water technology show, as 

a platform for business meetings and 

networking with the option to exhibit 

either on their own or in a shared CS 

exhibition area that will be offered 

separately as a supplemental service to 

Trade Mission participants. 

Commercial Setting 

India faces a critical shortage of 

reliable, safe water for personal 

consumption and for industrial use. In 

recent years rapid industrialization and 

a growing population have placed 

increasing demands on the country’s 

limited water resources. Although India 

receives substantial amounts of annual 

rainfall, the monsoon season is 

unpredictable and much of the rainfall 

is not captured. Furthermore, most of 

India’s water resources are allocated to 

the agricultural sector, leaving little or 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES