alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §247. Militia duty: exemptions

(a) The following persons are exempt from militia duty:

(1) The Vice President.

(2) The judicial and executive officers of the United States, the several States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

(3) Members of the armed forces, except members who are not on active duty.

(4) Customhouse clerks.

(5) Persons employed by the United States in the transmission of mail.

(6) Workmen employed in armories, arsenals, and naval shipyards of the United States.

(7) Pilots on navigable waters.

(8) Mariners in the sea service of a citizen of, or a merchant in, the United States.

(b) A person who claims exemption because of religious belief is exempt from militia duty in a combatant capacity, if the conscientious holding of that belief is established under such regulations as the President may prescribe. However, such a person is not exempt from militia duty that the President determines to be noncombatant.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 15, §312; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(a)(3), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(a)(7), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3441; renumbered §247, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 312(a)312(b) | 32:3 (less last 67 words).32:3 (last 67 words). | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §59, 39 Stat. 197. |

312(b)

32:3 (last 67 words).

In subsection (a), the words "Members of the armed forces" are substituted for the words "persons in the military or naval service". The words "except members who are not on active duty" are inserted to reflect an opinion of the Judge Advocate General of the Army (JAGA 1952/4374, 9 July 1952). The word "artificers" is omitted as covered by the word "workmen". The words "naval shipyards" are substituted for the words "navy yards" to reflect modern terminology. The words "on navigable waters" are inserted to preserve the original coverage of the word "pilots". The words "actually" and "without regard to age" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 renumbered section 312 of this title as this section.

2006—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands" for "States and Territories, and Puerto Rico".

1988—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 100–456 substituted "and Puerto Rico" for "Puerto Rico, and the Canal Zone".
EX-34.3
(logo)pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors of CoreLogic, Inc.:


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.
(the "Company"), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax
service provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2012 and for the year
then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi),
1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which
the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed
by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing
customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider
is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


February 6, 2013


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201
T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
#### § 212.23 Corporate qualifications and requests for information.

The provisions of § 211.23 of this subchapter are applicable to leases under this part.
### §8265. Mileage books: commutation tickets

The Secretary of the Navy may buy such mileage books, commutation tickets, and other similar transportation tickets as he considers necessary, and he may furnish them to persons ordered to perform travel on official business. Payment for those tickets before the travel is performed is not an advance of public money within the meaning of subsections (a) and (b) of section 3324 of title 31.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 386, §6154; Pub. L. 97–258, §3(b)(8), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1063; Pub. L. 98–525, title XIV, §1405(56)(A), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2626; renumbered §8265, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(10), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1835.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6154 | 34 U.S.C. 891. | Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1630, 33 Stat. 403 (6th par., 2d sentence). |

The words "to continue" and the words "upon their receipt in accordance with commercial usage" are omitted as surplusage. The word "persons" is substituted for the words "officers and others".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6154 of this title as this section.

1984—Pub. L. 98–525 substituted "subsections (a) and (b) of section 3324" for "section 3324(a) and (b)".

1982—Pub. L. 97–258 substituted "section 3324(a) and (b)" for "section 529".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 88 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 88

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

Mr. Thomas submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. Isakson.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Isakson.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 66 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 66

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 
         and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1999

 Mr. Shuster submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 
         and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the 
``Committee''), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 
shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House of 
Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, not more than 
$14,539,260 for the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,049,818 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1999, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2000; and
            (2) not more than $7,489,442 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2000, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2001.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
### §1223. Modification of plan before confirmation

(a) The debtor may modify the plan at any time before confirmation, but may not modify the plan so that the plan as modified fails to meet the requirements of section 1222 of this title.

(b) After the debtor files a modification under this section, the plan as modified becomes the plan.

(c) Any holder of a secured claim that has accepted or rejected the plan is deemed to have accepted or rejected, as the case may be, the plan as modified, unless the modification provides for a change in the rights of such holder from what such rights were under the plan before modification, and such holder changes such holder's previous acceptance or rejection.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 99–554, title II, §255, title III, §302(f), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3110, 3124; Pub. L. 103–65, §1, Aug. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 311; Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title I, §149(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–610; Pub. L. 106–5, §1(1), (2), Mar. 30, 1999, 113 Stat. 9; Pub. L. 106–70, §1, Oct. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1031; Pub. L. 107–8, §1, May 11, 2001, 115 Stat. 10; Pub. L. 107–17, §1, June 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 151; Pub. L. 107–170, §1, May 7, 2002, 116 Stat. 133; Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10814(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 532; Pub. L. 107–377, §2(a), Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3115; Pub. L. 108–73, §2(a), Aug. 15, 2003, 117 Stat. 891; Pub. L. 108–369, §2(a), Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1749; Pub. L. 109–8, title X, §1001(a)(1), (c), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 185, 186.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

For repeal of section effective Oct. 1, 1998, and subsequent reenactment of section, see note set out preceding section 1201 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Dates

Permanent reenactment of section effective July 1, 2005, see section 1001(a)(2) of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a Repeal, Reenactment, and Termination of Chapter note under section 1201 of this title. For effective dates of section and amendments extending periods for which section was reenacted prior to permanent reenactment, see Effective Date and Effective Date of 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Amendment notes set out under section 1201 of this title.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 26, 2016

No. 04-16-00252-CV

Jean Eckford HARDAWAY, Et al.,

Appellants

v.

Lou Eda Korth Stubbs NIXON, Et al.,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-09-0188-CVK

Honorable Russell H. Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants seek to appeal the trial court’s January 22, 2016 “Summary Judgment.” It 

appears, however, that the judgment may be interlocutory because (1) it does not dispose of 

appellees’ request for attorney’s fees contained in their “Plaintiff Intervenors’ Second Amended 

Petition in Intervention and Original Cross-Claims and Third-Party Claims,” and (2) the 

Summary Judgment does not mention West 17th Resources, LLC or West 17th Minerals, LLC. 

An order or judgment is final when it disposes of all claims asserted by and against all parties. 

Martinez v. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc., 875 S.W.2d 311, 312 (Tex. 1994); New York 

Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Sanchez, 799 S.W.2d 677, 678-79 (Tex. 1990). 

Because it appears this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal, appellants are 

ORDERED to show cause in writing no later than June 6, 2015 why this appeal should not be 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

Appellants’ Notice of Appeal identifies the appellants only as “Plaintiffs Jean Eckford 

Hardaway, et al.” Appellants are represented on appeal by Ms. Stella G. Marks. In her response 

to this show cause order, Ms. Marks is also ORDERED to fully identify all appellants by name.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of May, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2006244EN.01002402.xml

| 11.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4306 — Shell/Saint-Gobain/Avancis JV)

(2006/C 244/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4306. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4306. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

LINDA GLEBA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY 

COMMISSION, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 60 MM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
#### § 213.10 Lessor's signature.

Any Indian who cannot write his name will be required to sign all official papers by making a distinct thumbprint which shall be designated as “right” or “left” thumbmark. Such signatures must be witnessed by two persons, one of whom must be a U.S. Government employee (such as field clerk, postmaster, U.S. Commissioner, etc.).
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

PETERSON PAUL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 1

- 3131

[ July 28, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 50 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Lawrence Michael Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No . 5 62004CF002449A

.

Peterson Paul

, Century , pro se

.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Atto rney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

M AY , D AMOORGIAN , and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 8, 2006 
 THIS FIRST
AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), effective as of May 22, 2008 (the “Effective Date”), amends that certain Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement dated as of February 8, 2006 (the “2006 Option
Agreement”), by and between Zebra Technologies Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Christopher G. Knowles (the “Participant”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the 2006 Option Agreement, or, if not defined therein, then the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Zebra Technologies Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the
“Plan”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Company and Participant desire to amend the 2006 Option Agreement to accelerate the vesting and extend the exercise period for Option issued thereunder; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 12 of the Plan permits the amendment of the 2006 Option Agreement. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the mutual benefits to be gained by the
performance thereof, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and accepted, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 
  

	1.	Effective as of May 22, 2008, Section 1(b) of the 2006 Option Agreement is amended in it entirety by replacing it with the following: 

  

	 	“(b)	Vesting. The Option granted hereunder shall be 100% vested and exercisable until the Expiration Date (as hereinafter defined).” 

  

	2.	Effective as of May 22, 2008, Section 1(f) of the 2006 Option Agreement is amended in its entirety by replacing it with the following: 

  

	 	“(f)	Expiration. The “Expiration Date” shall be the ten (10) year anniversary of the Grant Date.” 

  

	3.	In all other respects, the 2006 Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

 [Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed by an officer
thereunto duly authorized, and the Participant has hereunto set his hand, all as of the day and year first above written. 
  

									
	ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION	 		 		 	Participant
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Noel Elfant
	 		 		 	 /s/ Christopher G. Knowles

		 	Noel Elfant	 		 		 	Christopher G. Knowles
		 	Vice President and General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      27,905,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               48,039,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (3,051,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            79,758,000
<PP&E>                                    (32,725,000)
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,947,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             691,517,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       53,991,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       263,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 542,571,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               691,517,000
<SALES>                                     46,231,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,231,000
<CGS>                                       34,085,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,149,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            48,149,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (23,847,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (23,847,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (23,847,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.93)


</TABLE>
### §982. Members: service on State and local juries

(a) A member of the armed forces on active duty may not be required to serve on a State or local jury if the Secretary concerned determines that such service—

(1) would unreasonably interfere with the performance of the member's military duties; or

(2) would adversely affect the readiness of the unit, command, or activity to which the member is assigned.

(b) A determination by the Secretary concerned under this section is conclusive.

(c) The Secretary concerned shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section.

(d) In this section, the term "State" includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each territory of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title V, §502(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3863.)