alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 24, 2014

No. 04-13-00300-CR

Richard M. LOPEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR5395

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The court has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing En Banc, and the motion 

is DENIED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
120 STAT. 2912 PUBLIC LAW 109–427—DEC. 20, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4510:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): Dec. 18, considered and passed House.

Vol. 152 (2006): Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–427

109th Congress

An Act

To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to accept the donation of a bust

depicting Sojourner Truth and to display the bust in a suitable location in the

Capitol.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

Congress finds as follows:

(1) Sojourner Truth was a towering figure among the

founders of the movement for women’s suffrage in the United

States, and no monument that does not include her can

accurately represent this important development in our

Nation’s history.

(2) The statue known as the Portrait Monument, originally

presented to Congress in 1920 in honor of the passage of

the Nineteenth Amendment guaranteeing women the right to

vote and presently exhibited in the rotunda of the Capitol,

portrays several early suffragists who were Sojourner Truth’s

contemporaries but not Sojourner Truth herself, the only African American among the group.

SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE AND DISPLAY OF BUST OF SOJOURNER TRUTH

IN CAPITOL.

(a) ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION OF BUST.—Not later than 2

years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Joint Committee on the Library shall accept the donation of a bust depicting

Sojourner Truth, subject to such terms and conditions as the Joint

Committee considers appropriate.

(b) DISPLAY.—The Joint Committee shall place the bust

accepted under subsection (a) in a suitable permanent location

in the Capitol.

Approved December 20, 2006.

Deadline.

Dec. 20, 2006

[H.R. 4510]
§ 13.13 Parties to the hearing. ( a ) The parties to the hearing will be the Defendant and the Authority.
( b ) Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(5), a private plaintiff under the False Claims Act may participate in these proceedings to the extent authorized by the provisions of that Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 530 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 22, 2000.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4516) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the bill 
for failure to comply with section 401(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 
1974 are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill 
shall be considered as read. Points of order against provisions in the bill for 
failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. No amendment to the bill 
shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order 
printed in the report, may be offered by a Member designated in the report, 
shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 
report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall 
not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 
of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of 
order against the amendments printed in the report are waived. The Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
##### 



Exhibit 32 ServiceWare Technologies, Inc. Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act  filed as
an exhibit to 10-Q for Quarter Ended March 31, 2005 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ServiceWare Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Bruce Armstrong, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Scott Schwartzman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Bruce Armstrong
    
    /s/ Scott SchwartzmanBruce Armstrong
Principal Executive Officer
May 16, 2005
    
    Scott Schwartzman
Principal Financial Officer
May 16, 2005
 The foregoing Certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general
statement incorporating by reference this report into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically
incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such
Acts. 32
# C_2006281EN.01004303.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/43

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2006 — Drazdansky v OHIM — Bad Heilbrunner Naturheilmittel (VITACAN)

(Case T-383/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 281/78)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 18.12.2004.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 482 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 213
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 482

                          [Report No. 106-600]

    Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2000

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative 
day of Wednesday, May 3, 2000, for the Speaker to entertain motions to 
suspend the rules, provided that the object of any such motion is 
announced from the floor at least one hour before the motion is 
offered. In scheduling the consideration of legislation under this 
authority, the Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority 
Leader or his designee.
    Sec. 2. House Resolution 469 is laid on the table.

                                                 House Calendar No. 213

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 482

                          [Report No. 106-600]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 2, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
-  Home 
-  Program Management, Data, and Statistics 
-  Data Operations 

# In This Section

                      -  Program Management, Data, and Statistics Overview 
                      -  Data Operations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Quality Management System 
                        -  Incident Reporting 
                        -  Incident Statistics 
                      -  Risk and Regulatory Analysis                          -  Overview 
                        -  Regulatory Impact Analysis 
                        -  Reports and Research 
                      -  Program Management 
                      -  PHMSA Data and Statistics 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Report an Incident Online                   
                  -                                          Information on XML Reporting                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Guide for Preparing HazMat Incidents                   
                  -                                          Incident Report Form                   

## Contact Us

Hazmat Program Management, Data and Statistics (PHH-60)
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-1074****Alt Phone:**800-467-4922****Fax:**202-366-3753**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Incident Reporting

## About Incident Reporting

***Who should I inform if I'm involved in a hazardous material incident that has taken place in transportation?***

The Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) require certain types of hazmat incidents be reported.

Section 171.15 of the HMR requires an immediate telephonic report (within 12 hours) to the National Response Center (NRC) following an incident (49 eCFR 171.15). You may call the NRC at 1-800-424-8802.

Section 171.16 requires incidents to be reported through PHMSA within 30 days of the incident, and a follow-up written report within one year of the incident, based on certain circumstances, to be reported to PHMSA through the Hazardous Materials Incident Report Form DOT F 5800.1 (49 eCFR 171.16).

***What is the Incident Report Form 5800.1?***

The Incident Report Form 5800.1 is a written report required by Section 171.16 of HMR that must be submitted within 30 days of a hazardous materials transportation incident, as defined by the HMR. The information collected on the report is used by PHMSA and other agencies to **mitigate risk**, **analyze gaps**, and **enhance safety**.
§ 700.465 Technical feasibility. Unless required by a non-Commission source of financial assistance, completed plans and specifications are not required at the time an application is submitted for construction, technology, or another engineering project, however, an application for a construction, technology or another engineering project shall: ( a ) Include sufficient information to determine the nature and scope of the project, its probable useful life, and a reasonable estimate of cost;
( b ) Fully show that the applicant will follow design and performance criteria which conform to professionally recognized standards and which adequately define the technical capability of the project to serve current and foreseeable needs; and
( c ) Justify any evidence or use of unorthodox design.
( d ) Show that the applicant has a management plan for the facility which identifies probable sources of operating funds.
( e ) An applicant who is awarded a grant under § 700.465 is required to submit completed plans and specifications for the construction, technology, or other engineering project prior to construction. The Commission shall review the completed plans and specifications for technical adequacy as part of its oversight function.
### [§10542. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title X, §1073(c)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 996]

Section, added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, §521(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1652, §3082; renumbered §10542 and amended Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(d)(3), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2982; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(b)(8), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 496; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title X, §1074(a)(21), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2660, related to annual report on Army National Guard combat readiness.
§ 13.12 Notice of hearing. ( a ) When the ALJ receives the Complaint and answer, the ALJ will promptly serve a notice of hearing upon the Defendant in the manner prescribed by § 13.8.
( b ) Such notice will include: ( 1 ) The tentative time and place, and the nature of the hearing;
( 2 ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( 3 ) The matters of fact and law to be asserted;
( 4 ) A description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing;
( 5 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the Representative of the Government and of the Defendant, if any; and
( 6 ) Such other matters as the ALJ deems appropriate.
### [§2304a. Renumbered §3403]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 2304a was renumbered section 3901 of this title.
# C_2007069EN.01002002.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/20

---

Action brought on 15 January 2007 — Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-15/07)

(2007/C 69/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma, C. Schulze-Bahr, assisted by C. von Donat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2006) 5164 final of 3 November 2006 on the reduction of ERDF financial assistance granted by Decision C(95) 1739 of 27 July 1995 in the Operational Programme for Nordrhein-Westfalen in the framework of the Community initiative RECHAR II (ERDF No 94.02.10.041 /ARINCO No 94.DE.16.056); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2006) 5164 final of 3 November 2006 on the reduction of ERDF financial assistance granted by Decision C(95) 1739 of 27 July 1995 in the Operational Programme for Nordrhein-Westfalen in the framework of the Community initiative RECHAR II (ERDF No 94.02.10.041 /ARINCO No 94.DE.16.056);

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision reduces the assistance of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in the Operational Program for Nordrhein-Westfalen in the framework of the Community Initiative RECHAR II.

In support of its action, the applicant submits that the contested decision infringes the Commission's authorising decision K(95) 1739 of 27 July 1995.

Moreover, it submits that there is an infringement of Article 24(2) of Regulation No 4253/88 (1), as the conditions for reduction are not satisfied. It also submits that the departures from the indicative financing plan do not constitute a significant change of the program.

1

Even if there were a significant change of the program, the applicant submits that the Commission previously agreed to a flexible application of the indicative financing plans by virtue of its Guidelines for the financial closure of operational measures (1994-1999) from the Structural Funds (SEK (1999) 1316).

On the assumption that the conditions for a reduction are satisfied, the applicant complains that the defendant failed to use its discretion in relation to the specific program. The Commission should have considered whether a reduction of the ERDF assistance was proportionate.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 of 19 December 1988 laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards coordination of the activities of the different Structural Funds between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments (OJ L 374, 31.12.1988, p. 1).

1

---
#### § 63.12 What are minimum standards of character?

Minimum standards of character are established by an employer and refer to identifiable character traits and past conduct. An employer may use character traits and past conduct to determine whether an applicant, volunteer, or employee can effectively perform the duties of a particular position without risk of harm to others. Minimum standards of character ensure that no applicant, volunteer, or employee will be placed in a position with regular contact with or control over Indian children if he/she has been found guilty of or entered a plea of nolo contendere or guilty to any felonious offense, or any of two or more misdemeanor offenses under Federal, State, or Tribal law involving crimes of violence; sexual assault, sexual molestation, sexual exploitation, sexual contact or prostitution; crimes against persons; or offenses committed against children.

[85 FR 37564, June 23, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.73 Is a lease with the Secretary the only method available to recover the types of cost described in § 900.70?

No. With the exception of paragraph (i) in § 900.70, the same types of costs may be recovered in whole or in part under section 106(a) of the Act as direct or indirect charges to a self-determination contract.
#### Fannie Garlanz v. Alonzo B. See.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
P.1 

OAR Box 1878 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

140) ll-B-53 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 11/28/20081:21:26 PM Sheet 140 of 145 
P.2 

A-90-19 

ll-B-53 

PENDING CONFIDENTIAL^ 

JLUJL 

jPAAfR POCKET^ 

The following information is located in the confidential 

files of the Director, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This 

information is confidential pending final determination by the 

Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

W. Floyd, Radian Corporation, to Process Vents Docket 

A-90-19, December 1990, HON NESHAP: Industry 

Characteristics/Ethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether. 48 pages. 

CBI Document Control No. 86/23, PPS-53.
§ 39.408 What are the responsibilities of administrative officials? Administrative officials have the following responsibilities: ( a ) Applying the appropriate standards in this part for classifying and counting ISEP eligible Indian students at the school for formula funding purposes;
( b ) Accounting for and reporting student transportation expenditures;
( c ) Providing training and supervision to ensure that appropriate standards are adhered to in counting students and accounting for student transportation expenditures;
( d ) Submitting all reports and data on a timely basis; and
( e ) Taking appropriate disciplinary action for failure to comply with requirements of this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                                   U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                          3,597,063
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      97,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,548,891
<PP&E>                                         31,683,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                    845,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,728,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           9,776,298
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        10,410
<COMMON>                                            2,884
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,736,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,728,874
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  333,775
<CGS>                                           1,058,278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,766,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                457,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,694,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (564,480)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,129,674)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,129,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (3.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (3.95)
        




</TABLE>