alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****MEMORY PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     The undersigned officer of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. (the “Company”) hereby certifies tohis knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2007 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        /s/ James R. Sulat   JAMES R. SULAT   President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)   November 14, 2007 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. and will be retained by MemoryPharmaceuticals Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
§ 38.4 Education positions. ( a ) The Director shall establish the kinds of positions required to carry out the Bureau's education function. No position will be established or continued for which: ( 1 ) Funds are not available; or
( 2 ) There is not a clearly demonstrable need and intent for it to carry out an education function.
( b ) Positions established for regular school operations will be restricted to school term or program duration. Particular care shall be taken to insure that year-long positions are not established unless they are clearly required and involve essential 12-month assignments.
# C_2007042EN.01004703.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 16 January 2007 — Frankin and Others v Commission

(Case F-3/06) (1)

1

(Officials - Obligation on the administration to provide assistance - Refusal - Transfer of pension rights acquired in Belgium)

(2007/C 42/83)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Jacques Frankin (Sorée, Belgium) and Others (represented by: G. Bouneou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and D. Martin, Agents)

Defendant:

:

Re:

First, annulment of the Commission's decision rejecting the requests for assistance submitted by the applicants in connection with the transfer of their pension rights acquired in Belgium and, secondly, an application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.3.2006, p. 33.

1

---
#### Thea Johannsen, Respondent, v Bestany Rudolph et al., Appellants.

[824 NYS2d 276]

*339Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, J.), entered February 3, 2006, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff contends that she tripped on a plastic packaging hoop while walking on the sidewalk near defendants’ alleyway dumpsters and that refuse had been present on the subject sidewalk area on many occasions. It is undisputed that at the time of the accident, defendants were under no statutory duty to maintain the sidewalk. Plaintiff claims that defendants created the dangerous condition because no other store on the subject street, but for defendants’ store, disposed of plastic packaging hoops similar to the one that allegedly caused plaintiff to trip and fall. This averment was contained in an attorney’s affirmation submitted in opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. It was not made on the basis of personal knowledge of the facts or supported by evidence in admissible form and, therefore, was insufficient to defeat the motion for summary judgment *(Diaz v New York City Tr. Auth.,*12 AD3d 316 [2004]; *Ramos v New York City Hous. Auth.,*264 AD2d 568 [1999]). Concur—Andrias, J.P, Nardelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
#### PIEDMONT & WESTERN INVESTMENT CORP. v. CARNES-MILLER GEAR CO.

No. 507P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 105

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990. Motion by plaintiff to amend petition allowed 18 January 1990.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

85-12 

May 28, 1985 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4205(c) Partial Withdrawal. Retail Food Industry Provision 

OPINION: 

This responds to your request for the PBGC's opinion concerning the meaning of the term "retail food industry" as

it is used in Section 4205(c) of ERISA (concerning partial withdrawals in that industry). Specifically you wish to know

whether the retail food industry encompasses the food service industry. 

Section 4205(c) applies to "a plan in which a majority of the covered employees are employed in the retail food

industry." Therefore, the distinction you suggest is relevant, if at all, only in determining whether a plan is covered by

this special partial withdrawal rule. If the plan is covered, all contributing employers, regardless of type, would also be

covered. 

Congress did not define the retail food industry for purposes of Title IV, nor is there any indication in the legislative

history of the multiemployer amendments as to what Congress intended. As you note, however, the Standard Industrial

Classification published by the Department of Commerce does define two subcategories under the retail food industry.

In our view sources such as this would be helpful to a plan's determination of whether it is covered by the [*2] special

rule. Relying on such a source the plan might decide that food service employees must be counted for purposes of its

determination. Such a determination, of course, is subject to the dispute resolution procedures described in Sections

4219 and 4221 of ERISA. 

I hope this is of assistance. If you have further questions on this matter, please contact * * * of my staff at the above

address or at (202) 254-4873. 

Edward R. Mackiewicz 

General Counsel
### Part B—General Powers of the Bureau
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-23 

March 11, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022(b)(8). Benefits Guaranteed. Five Year Phase-in of Guarantee. 

OPINION: 

 This is in further response to your inquiry regarding the interpretation of Section 4022(b)(8) of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, which prescribes the method of phasing-in benefits in existence for less than

five years. 

The Corporation has identified three potential ambiguities within the language describing the rule and we invite your

comments regarding our tentative thinking on them. 

Regarding the determination of the first year a benefit has been in effect, the statutory language is quite clear and

prevails over arguable conflicts in the legislative history. The 12 months following the later of the plan (or amendment)

adoption date or effective date constitutes the "first year" to which the phase-in formula is to be applied. 

Recognizing an otherwise potential defeat of the very purpose of phasing-in benefits, we are inclined to interpret

the rule as requiring that all benefit increases within a 12-month period be treated as a single benefit increase for purposes

of applying the $20.00 per month limitation in Section 4022(b)(8)(B). Thus a series of amendments within a calendar

year would [*2] be cumulated and viewed as a single amendment to the plan for this purpose. 

Finally, the 20-percent limitation in Section 4022(b)(8)(A) is to be applied after the Section 4022(b)(3) limitation

on the total benefit guarantee is applied to the benefits. Again, this construction of the statutory language is believed to

best adhere to the congressional intent and the concept that the rule of one of "phasing-in" benefits. 

We apologize for the delay in responding to your inquiry and welcome your views on our tentative approach to the

phase-in rule. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
POTENTIAL NEW PRODUCTS 

The following tables are a list of possible new commercial and residential products derived fiom 

various independent sources. 

pew Products - Commercial 1 

l~ommercial Clothes Washers I 

Commercial Clothes Dryers 

Commercial Electric Cooking 

ICommercial Gas Cooking I 

Supmarket Refrigeration 

Walk-in Refrigerators 

Vending Machines 

IBeverage Merchandisers I 

JReach-in Refrigerators I 

lice Machines I 

Traffic Signals 

Pedestrian Crossing Signs 

l~eneral Service incandescent lamps (Commercial) 4 

Gas Unit Heater 

Oil Unit Heater 

Gas Duct Furnace 

Ground-coupled HP 

Desktop PC - Commercial 

IMonitors - Commercial I 

IServer Computers - Commercial I 

/Copy Machines - Commercial I aser Printers - Commercial 

AX Machines - Commercial I 

EE-PS-01-001 COMMENT 02G
POTENTIAL NEW PRODUCTS 

I" ew Products - Residential$ 

Desktop PC - Residential 

Monitors - Residential 

Copy Machines - Residential 

Laser Printers - ~esidential 

FAX Machines - Residential 

Inkjet Printers - Residential 

Auto Coffee Maker - Residential 

Cable Box - Residential I 

Compact Audio - Residential 

De-humidifier - Residential 

Torchieres (Halogen) 

VCR - Residential 

Waterbed Heater - Residential 

well Pump - Residential 

Window, Stand and Desk Fans - Residential . Ceiling: Fans - Residential 

$ NAECA authorizes rulemakings for residential 

products with average usage per household of 100 

kWyear 

EE-PS-01-001 COMMENT 02G
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, David B. Nussbaum, Chief Executive Officer of Penton Media, Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Penton Media, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated:
May 20, 2005
    
    /s/ David B. NussbaumDavid B. NussbaumChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
CAP CANAL

CAP CANAL

Manville Rd.

Reservation Rd.

Mile Wide Rd.

Trico Rd.

Pump Station Rd.

El Tiro Rd.

Trico-Marana Rd.

Sasco Rd.

Anway Rd.

Avra Valley Rd.

Silverbell Rd.

Curtis Rd.

Picacho Hwy.

Baumgartner Rd.

Cripple Creek Rd. Coachway Rd.

Aries Dr.

Sunland Gin Rd.

Greene Reservoir Rd.

Sandario Rd.

Twin Peaks Rd.

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION BOUNDARY

Saguaro

National

Park

R6E R7E R8E R9E R10E

T11S T10S T9S T12S

T13S T14S

R11E

Pinal County

Pima County

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of the information shown. Spatial

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This

information may be updated without notification.

Universal Tranverse Mercator

Zone 12, Units Meters

Clark 1866 Spheroid

NAD27 Datum

P:\BLM\Ironwood\GIS\Plots\RMP_EIS\Chapter_2\VRI_AltA.pdf

Location in Arizona

0 1 2 4 Miles

0 2 4 8 Kilometers

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft RMP/EIS

Visual Resources

Management 

Aternative A

Legend

Map 2-6

Data Source:

VRM Information: URS 2006

Base Information: BLM 2003

Quadrangle Image: U.S. Geological Survey 1977 Tucson

Planning Area

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal

River

General Reference

County Boundaries

Main public access routes to monument. County administered

roads connecting monument travel route system to public

highways.

Interstate 10

Note: 

 Land use allocations, designations, and management 

 prescriptions apply only to public lands administered

 by the BLM. If non-Federal lands are acquired, they

 would be managed according to the allocations

 depicted on the map. 

Visual Resource Management Class

Class III
# C_2006281EN.01003202.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/32

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 September 2006 — MIP METRO v OHIM Tesco Stores (METRO)

(Case T-191/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a figurative mark consisting of the word mark METRO - Earlier national word mark METRO - Expiry of protection of earlier national trade mark)

(2006/C 281/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: MIP METRO Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: R. Kaase, avocat)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Tesco Stores Ltd (Cheshunt, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 March 2004 (Case R 486/2003-1), relating to opposition proceedings between MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG and Tesco Stores Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 March 2004 (Case R 486/2003-1) is annulled; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 March 2004 (Case R 486/2003-1) is annulled;

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant;

| 3. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 7.8.2004.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.155 When must a Tribe respond to a notice of intent to reassume?

The Tribe must respond to the Secretary in writing by mail, facsimile, or overnight express within 5 days of receiving the Secretary's notice of intent to reassume. If sent by mail, the Tribe must send the response by certified mail, with return receipt requested. The Secretary will consider the date of the written response as the date it is postmarked.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-422]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement 
Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice 
Improvement Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, February 3, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement 
Project Committee will be held Thursday, February 3, 2011, at 2 p.m. 
Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information, please contact Ms. 
Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 
MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post 
comments to the Web site:  http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 5, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-422 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
exv10w19






Exhibit 10.19



CIRRUS LOGIC, Inc. 2901 Via Fortuna, Austin, TX 78746

Tel: (512) 851-4000 www.cirrus.com









April 9, 2008




Bin Wu

Rm 901, No 22, Lane

1599 of Dingxiang Rd.

PuDong District

Shanghai, China




Via email




RE: Termination of Employment Relationship and Release of Claims




Dear Bin,





	 	 	I am writing to confirm our understanding with respect to your termination of employment with
Caretta Integrated Circuits and the release of all potential claims against Cirrus Logic, Inc. and
its subsidiaries (collectively, “Cirrus”) with respect to the Stock Purchase Agreement, by and
among Cirrus Logic China Holdings, Inc. (“Buyer”); Caretta Integrated Circuits (the “Company”); and
each of the shareholders of the Company, dated as of December 29, 2006 (the “Stock Purchase
Agreement”). In consideration of signing and returning the Agreement of Termination of Employment
Contract, the Employee Termination Proprietary Rights Statement, and the General Release of All
Claims (collectively, the “Termination Agreements”) previously provided to you, Cirrus Logic agrees
as follows:






	 	(1)	 	Cirrus will not enforce any non-compete obligation that may exist between Cirrus and
you so long as you comply with the terms of this letter agreement and the Termination
Agreements; and






	 	(2)	 	Cirrus will withdraw all claims that Buyer has made with respect to the Escrow
Agreement entered into on December 29, 2006, upon receipt of the signed Termination
Agreements from you.






	 	 	This letter agreement further confirms our understanding that you are signing the Termination
Agreements and this letter agreement and releasing Cirrus from all claims, including any claims
relating to the Earn Out provisions under the Stock Purchase Agreement, in your own capacity as a
former employee of Cirrus and as a Principal Shareholder and Seller (but not as the Representative)
as defined under the Stock Purchase Agreement.




 









 













	 	 	I look forward to reaching a final resolution with you on this matter. Please indicate your
agreement to the terms of this letter agreement by signing below and returning to my attention. If
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,





Jason Rhode

President and Chief Executive Officer

Cirrus Logic, Inc.

 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Bin Wu

	 	 
	 	Date:
	 	April 10, 2008
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Bin Wu
### §1520. Effects of recognition of a foreign main proceeding

(a) Upon recognition of a foreign proceeding that is a foreign main proceeding—

(1) sections 361 and 362 apply with respect to the debtor and the property of the debtor that is within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States;

(2) sections 363, 549, and 552 apply to a transfer of an interest of the debtor in property that is within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States to the same extent that the sections would apply to property of an estate;

(3) unless the court orders otherwise, the foreign representative may operate the debtor's business and may exercise the rights and powers of a trustee under and to the extent provided by sections 363 and 552; and

(4) section 552 applies to property of the debtor that is within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

(b) Subsection (a) does not affect the right to commence an individual action or proceeding in a foreign country to the extent necessary to preserve a claim against the debtor.

(c) Subsection (a) does not affect the right of a foreign representative or an entity to file a petition commencing a case under this title or the right of any party to file claims or take other proper actions in such a case.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 141.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.