alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-196478 on Form F-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-196622 and 333-203042 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2016 , relating to the consolidated financial statements and the supplemental schedule of investment property information of Brookfield Property Partners L.P. and subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) and the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2015 .





/s/ Deloitte LLP





Chartered Professional Accountants


Licensed Public Accountants





March 16, 2016


Toronto, Canada
#### WATERHOUSE v. CAROLINA LIMOUSINE MANUFACTURING

No. 532P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 109

Petition by intervenors for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 January 1990.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1119 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1119

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2000

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Act of August 9, 1950, to continue funding of the Coastal 
           Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING OF THE COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, PROTECTION AND 
              RESTORATION ACT.

    Section 4(a) of the Act of August 9, 1950 (16 U.S.C. 777c(a)), is 
amended in the second sentence by striking ``1999'' and inserting 
``2009''.

            Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
### §9452. Cadets: hazing

(a) Subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Superintendent of the Academy shall issue regulations—

(1) defining hazing;

(2) designed to prevent that practice; and

(3) prescribing dismissal, suspension, or other adequate punishment for violations.

(b) If a cadet who is charged with violating a regulation issued under subsection (a), the penalty for which is or may be dismissal from the Academy, requests in writing a trial by a general court-martial, he may not be dismissed for that offense except under sentence of such a court.

(c) A cadet dismissed from the Academy for hazing may not be reappointed as a cadet, and is ineligible for appointment as a commissioned officer in a regular component of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps, or in the Space Force, until two years after the graduation of his class.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 566, §9352; renumbered §9452, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(a)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(d)(13), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3815; Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1721(c)(4), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 667.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9352(a)9352(b) 9352(c) | 10:1163 (1st par.).10:1163 (1st 32 words of last par.).10:1163 (last par., less 1st 32 words). | Mar. 2, 1901, ch. 804 (2d proviso under "Permanent Establishment"); restated Apr. 19, 1910, ch. 174 (38th par. under "Buildings and Grounds"), 36 Stat. 323. |

9352(b)

9352(c)

10:1163 (1st 32 words of last par.).

10:1163 (last par., less 1st 32 words).

In subsection (a), the word "violations" is substituted for the words "infractions of the same". The words "to embody a clear" are omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (b), the words "the penalty for which is or may be" are substituted for the words "which would involve". The words "may not be dismissed for that offense except under sentence of such a court" are substituted for the words "shall be granted".

In subsection (c), the words "a regular component" are inserted, since the source statute historically applied only to the regular components.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 118–31 substituted "or Marine Corps, or in the Space Force," for "Marine Corps, or Space Force,".

2021—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "as a cadet" for "as an Air Force cadet" and "Marine Corps, or Space Force" for "or Marine Corps".

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 9352 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32. - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Australian-Canadian Oil
Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Mahnaz Nourmand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: May 5, 2010             /s/ ANDRE SAKHAI
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Andre Sakhai, President & Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 5, 2010             /s/ MAHNAZ NOURMAND
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Mahnaz Nourmand, Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

DisabilitiesEducational TechnologyElementary Secondary EducationInclusive SchoolsLaboratory EquipmentMainstreamingScience InstructionSpecial Needs StudentsTeacher AttitudesTeaching Methods

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
§ 44.110 What Indian Self-Determination Act provisions apply to grants under the Tribally Controlled Schools Act? ( a ) The following provisions of 25 CFR part 900 apply to grants under the Tribally Controlled Schools Act. ( 1 ) Subpart F; Standards for Tribal or Tribal Organization Management Systems, § 900.45.
( 2 ) Subpart H; Lease of Tribally-owned Buildings by the Secretary.
( 3 ) Subpart I; Property Donation Procedures.
( 4 ) Subpart N; Post-award Contract Disputes.
( 5 ) Subpart P; Retrocession and Reassumption Procedures.
( b ) To resolve any disputes arising from the Secretary's administration of the requirements of this part, the procedures in subpart N of part 900 apply if the dispute involves any of the following: ( 1 ) Any exception or problem cited in an audit;
( 2 ) Any dispute regarding the grant authorized;
( 3 ) Any dispute involving an administrative cost grant;
( 4 ) Any dispute regarding new construction or facility improvement or repair; or
( 5 ) Any dispute regarding the Secretary's denial or failure to act on a request for facilities funds.
April 15, 2015

Milliken Chemical ATTN: Mrs. Beth Trenor 920 Milliken Road, M-209 Spartanburg, SC 29303

Dear Mrs. Trenor: Thank you for your Inventory Expert Service (IES) order of April 13, 2015. The processing results are attached. To ensure efficient processing of your substance(s), it is important that these results are included with your PMN report for when reporting to the EPA. An invoice will be issued for the cost of the technical processing for your order. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely, Candice Egelhoff CAS Client Services Enclosure(s),(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU1RW5HJLVWHUHG &$,QGH[1DPH 6LOR[DQHVDQG6LOLFRQHV0HK\GURJHQK\GURO\VLVSURGXFWVZLWK WHWUDPHWK\OGLVLOR[DQHGLVWQUHVLGXHV
```

EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of June 1, 2012, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and
Certificate Administrator, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank,
National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating
Advisor and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-GCJ7 (the
"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have
the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from June 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the period June 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2013.

/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
```
# C_2013085EN.01000301.xml

| 23.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/3

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 85/03

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Lannion–Paris (Orly) |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation | 25 October 2009 |
| Date of entry into force of the changes | 23 September 2013 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Arrêté du 29 janvier 2013 modifiant les obligations de service public imposées sur les services aériens réguliers entre Lannion et Paris (Orly)
  NOR: DEVA1300106A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information, please contact:





  Direction générale de l’aviation civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris Cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Lannion–Paris (Orly)

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation

25 October 2009

Date of entry into force of the changes

23 September 2013

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Arrêté du 29 janvier 2013 modifiant les obligations de service public imposées sur les services aériens réguliers entre Lannion et Paris (Orly)

NOR: DEVA1300106A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information, please contact:

Direction générale de l’aviation civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris Cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

247) ll-K- (I) -60 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

p.i 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57 AM Sheet 247 of 325 
P.2 

ENERGY SCENARIO COMPARISON. 

EEA, Inc. 

/AU$1 

II-K-(I)-60 

June 10, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-60
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-5 

March 26, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

4001(b) Definitions. Employer and Controlled Group

4048 Date of Termination

4062(a) Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans. Applicability

4062(b) Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans. Amount of Employer Liability

4068(c)(1) Lien for Employer Liability. Priority of Lien 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter in which you requested PBGC to rule on the consequence to A Inc. under Title

IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 as amended by The Multiemployer Pension Plan

Amendments Act of 1980 ("ERISA") in connection with the transactions described below. 

The facts as we understand them are as follows. * * * Inc. ("Seller") sponsored and maintained the * * * Retirement

Plan (the "Plan"). Seller is wholly-owned by B Corporation * * *. The Plan was terminated and the date of termination

of December 1, 1979 was set pursuant to § 4048 of ERISA by agreement between PBGC, the Seller and the Committee

of the * * * Retirement Plan. 

On or about July 8, 1980, Seller entered into a contract to sell the assets of the Seller's * * * division to Inc.

("Buyer") a party unrelated to the Seller. The Buyer's rights pursuant to the contract [*2] were assigned to A Inc.

("Buyer Sub"), a subsidiary of Buyer, which is also unrelated to the Seller. The sale closed on December 18, 1980. 

On June 6, 1980, the PBGC notified the Seller that the PBGC was unable to determine that the assets held under

the Plan were sufficient on the date of plan termination to pay all benefits guaranteed by PBGC. 

Section 4602(a) of ERISA provides that "any employer who maintained a plan . . . at the time it was terminated .

. ." shall be liable to the PBGC for an amount determined under § 4062(b) of ERISA. Under § 4001(b) of ERISA and

29 CFR 2612, trades or businesses under common control are treated as a single employer for purposes of Title IV

liability ("controlled group"). Accordingly, the controlled group consisting of B and Seller and any other business under

common control are liable to the PBGC under § 4062 of ERISA in connection with the termination of the Plan.

Assuming the sale was for fair market value, Buyer Sub would not be subject to liability resulting from the termination

of the Plan. 

You have indicated that Buyer Sub intends to obtain additional financing and to pledge the purchased property as

security for the loan. We note [*3] that § 4068(c)(1) of ERISA adopts the lien priority rules of § 6323 of the Internal

Revenue Code. Generally, these rules provide protection against the PBGC's lien, if any, for a holder of a security

interest if such secured party's interest is perfected before notice of the PBGC lien is filed. Since no notice of PBGC's

lien has been filed to date, or is expected to be filed by March 31, 1981, a security interest in the assets filed on that date

would take priority over a subsequently filed PBGC lien. 

I hope this response is helpful. If you have any further questions, please contact me or * * * of my staff at 202-254-

3010 who is handling the matter. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 13.9 Answer. ( a ) The Defendant may request a hearing by serving an answer on the Reviewing Official within 30 days of service of the Complaint. Service of an answer will be Made by delivering a copy to the Reviewing Official or by placing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed to the Reviewing Official. Service of an answer is complete upon such delivery or mailing. An answer will be deemed to be a request for hearing.
( b ) In the answer, the Defendant: ( 1 ) Will admit or deny each of the allegations of liability Made in the Complaint;
( 2 ) Will state any defense on which the Defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why the Defendant contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Will state the name, address, and telephone number of the Person authorized by the Defendant to act as Defendant's Representative, if any.
( c ) If the Defendant is unable to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the time provided, the Defendant may, before the expiration of 30 days from service of the Complaint, serve on the Reviewing Official a general answer denying liability and requesting a hearing, and a request for an extension of time within which to serve an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The Reviewing Official will file promptly the Complaint, the general answer denying liability, and the request for an extension of time as provided in § 13.11. For good cause shown, the ALJ may grant the Defendant up to 30 additional days from the original due date within which to serve an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
# C_2006190EN.01003201.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/32

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2006 — Sanchez Ferriz v Commission

(Case F-19/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Career Development Report - Assessment procedure for 2003)

(2006/C 190/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Carlos Sanchez Ferriz (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: G. Bouneou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, then only F. Frabetti)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the assessment procedure for 2003 in relation to the applicant, or, in the alternative, annulment of the applicant's Career Development Report for 2003

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155 of 25.06.2005 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-153/05 and transferred to the European Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

      ( print page 2196)    

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 8, 2011. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, February 8, 2011, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information, please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: January 5, 2011. 

Shawn Collins, 

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2011-404 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# CA2006290EN.01000101.xml

| 29.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 290/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 290/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
### §1530. Coordination of more than 1 foreign proceeding

In matters referred to in section 1501, with respect to more than 1 foreign proceeding regarding the debtor, the court shall seek cooperation and coordination under sections 1525, 1526, and 1527, and the following shall apply:

(1) Any relief granted under section 1519 or 1521 to a representative of a foreign nonmain proceeding after recognition of a foreign main proceeding must be consistent with the foreign main proceeding.

(2) If a foreign main proceeding is recognized after recognition, or after the filing of a petition for recognition, of a foreign nonmain proceeding, any relief in effect under section 1519 or 1521 shall be reviewed by the court and shall be modified or terminated if inconsistent with the foreign main proceeding.

(3) If, after recognition of a foreign nonmain proceeding, another foreign nonmain proceeding is recognized, the court shall grant, modify, or terminate relief for the purpose of facilitating coordination of the proceedings.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 144.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.