alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Plan Terminations 
-  How To Handle Missing Participants In a Standard Termination 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# How to Handle Missing Participants in a Standard Termination

### Background

Employers choosing to end fully funded PBGC-insured single-employer pension plans must distribute all plan benefits to workers and retirees before completely ending the plan. If someone cannot be found, the plan administrator either purchases an annuity from a private insurer in that person's name or sends funds to PBGC for distribution when the participant is found. Companies often have had difficulty finding an insurance company or financial institution willing to accept the funds on behalf of a missing person and the people who have been missed often have had no idea where to look for their benefits. That’s where PBGC’s Missing Participants Program comes into play.

### Different rules apply depending when the plan terminates

In late 2017, several changes were made to PBGC’s Missing Participants Program with respect to plans that terminate on or after January 1, 2018. The key changes were:
                          - Expanding the program to cover other types of terminating retirement plans (e.g., 401(k) plans, and
                          - With respect to PBGC-insured single-employer plans, revising:                               - – The methodology for determining the value of a missing participant’s benefit (i.e., the amount to transfer to PBGC)
                            - – The diligent search requirements, and
                            - – The reporting requirements. 

The prior rules continue to apply to PBGC-insured single employer plans with plan termination dates before January 1, 2018, even if such plans didn’t fully close out until sometime in 2018.

### Where to find more information

If you are terminating a PBGC-insured single employer plan and are seeking information about how to handle missing participants, click on the applicable links below:

July 25, 2023
# C_2006331EN.01003302.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/33

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 28 November 2006 — Milbert and Others v Commission

(Case T-47/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Career development report - 2001/2002 appraisal procedure)

(2006/C 331/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Alex Milbert (Hesperange, Luxembourg), Saturnino Durán Vidal (Brussels, Belgium), Roland Hanff (Dudelange, Luxembourg), Maria Anita Nuotio (Brussels), Paraskevi Papageorgiou (Brussels), Andrea Ranschaert (Drongen, Belgium), Reinhard Rieder (Brussels) and Ioannis Terezakis (Brussels) (represented by: initially G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, then F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Primarily, application for annulment of the 2001-2002 appraisal procedure in so far as it concerns the applicants or, in the alternative, annulment of the applicants' career development reports in respect of that procedure

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decisions adopting the career development reports of Mr Terezakis and Ms Papageorgiou for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decisions adopting the career development reports of Mr Terezakis and Ms Papageorgiou for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those of Mr Terezakis and Ms Papageorgiou; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those of Mr Terezakis and Ms Papageorgiou;

| 4. | Orders Mr Milbert, Mr Durán Vidal, Mr Hanff, Mr Rieder, Ms Nuotio and Ms Ranschaert to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Mr Milbert, Mr Durán Vidal, Mr Hanff, Mr Rieder, Ms Nuotio and Ms Ranschaert to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.

1

---
-  Home 

# Hazardous Materials Special Permits Action Plan

Special Permits Action Plan.pdf (50.35 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
§ 83.42 When will the Assistant Secretary issue a final determination? ( a ) AS-IA will issue a final determination and publish a notice of availability in the Federal Register within 90 days from the date on which he/she begins its review. AS-IA will also ( 1 ) Provide copies of the final determination to the petitioner and those listed in § 83.22(d); and
( 2 ) Make copies of the final determination available to others upon written request.
( b ) AS-IA will strive to limit the final determination and any reports to no more than 100 pages, cumulatively, excluding source documents.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-19 

July 21, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041A(a) Multiemployer Termination. Termination 

OPINION: 

 This is in reference to your notice concerning the merger of the * * * Pension Fund, a multiemployer plan covered

under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA") into the * * * * * *

Annuity Fund, a multiemployer plan that is not covered under Title IV. The former plan is a defined benefit plan, which

you state has sufficient assets to satisfy nonforfeitable benefits under the plan. The latter is an individual account plan.

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC" ) has determined that the merger of the defined benefit plan into

the individual account plan constitutes a termination of the defined benefit plan under section 4041A(a) of ERISA.

Accordingly, participants' nonforfeitable benefits under the defined benefit plan must be provided in accordance with

Title IV. 

Under ERISA, the assets of a terminated multiemployer plan covered under Title IV may be distributed in full

satisfaction of all nonforfeitable benefits under the plan as of the date of plan termination. PBGC authorization of a

distribution is not required, if the rules and procedures outlined below are followed. [*2] 

Each participant must receive his or her benefit in the form of an annuity unless the participant elects, in writing,

another form of distribution provided by the plan. A participant may be offered additional forms of distribution (e.g.,

lump sum payment of the commuted value of the annuity or transfer of such value to an individual account plan)

permitted by the plan document. When a participant is afforded the opportunity to elect alternative forms of distribution,

he or she must be advised of the estimated amounts of the annuity and of the alternative forms of distribution, and that

PBGC will not guarantee the benefit payable in an alternative form. 

 A participant need not be offered an annuity option if the value of his or her benefit does not exceed $1750. Even

if a participant is not required to be offered an annuity under the above rules, in a case where the plan termination is

effected by the conversion of the plan into a defined contribution plan, a participant must nevertheless be given the option

of receiving his or her nonforfeitable benefit in a lump sum; the participant cannot be required to have his or her benefits

transferred to the individual account plan. [*3] 

Finally, we request that if a distribution in made in full satisfaction of all nonforfeitable benefits under the Plan, that

the PBGC be notified, within 60 days thereafter, of the date of the distribution. Please send such notification to the

Division of Case Classification and Control, Office of Program Operations (542), Pension Benefits Guaranty

Corporation, 2020 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. This notification will enable the PBGC to remove the Plan

from the PBGC-1 and premium billing mailing list. 

I hope this information is of assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-143 

May 13, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041(a) Termination by Plan Administrator. Filing of Notice of Intent to Terminate 

OPINION: 

 This letter is in response to your request for reconsideration by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the

"PBGC") of its denial of the request of the above-identified company (the "Company") to withdraw the Notice of Intent

to Terminate filed for * * * (the "Plan"). 

The pertinent facts are as follows. A Notice of Intent to Terminate the Plan was received by the PBGC on June 17,

1976. The Notice proposed June 30, 1976, as the date of plan termination. On June 24, 1976, prior to the proposed

termination date, the PBGC received a letter dated June 22, 1976, from the Company requesting that the Notice be

withdrawn. The Company wanted to withdraw the Notice for the purpose of amending the Plan, but intended that

termination of the Plan should thereafter proceed. The request for withdrawal of the Notice was denied by PBGC at that

time. 

Under these circumstances Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 would appear not to

prohibit the withdrawal of the Notice, and accordingly the request to withdraw is granted. In view of the time elapsed,

the PBGC will recognize an amendment [*2] to the Plan effective as of June 24, 1976, and will treat the request for

withdrawal as a new Notice of Intent to Terminate with a proposed Plan termination date of July 5, 1976. 

I hope this is of assistance to you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4246]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD


Meetings

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) plans to hold its regular committee and Board meetings 
in Washington, DC, Monday through Wednesday, March 7-9, 2011, at the 
times and location noted below.

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Monday, March 7, 2011

    9:30-Noon Technical Programs Committee.
    1:30-2 p.m. Budget Committee.
    2:15-3 Planning and Evaluation Committee.
    3:15-4 Presentation from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing on 
accessible currency.

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

    9:30-4 p.m. Ad Hoc Committee Meetings: Closed to Public.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

    9:30-11 a.m. Presentation on the Implementation of Section 508.
    1:30-3 p.m. Board Meeting.

ADDRESSES: All meetings will be held at the Access Board Conference 
Room, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact David Capozzi, Executive Director, (202) 272-
0010 (voice); (202) 272-0082 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the Board meeting scheduled on the 
afternoon of Wednesday, March 9, 2011, the Access Board will consider 
the following agenda items:
    <bullet> Approval of the draft January 12, 2011 meeting minutes.
    <bullet> Budget Committee Report.
    <bullet> Planning and Evaluation Committee Report.
    <bullet> Technical Programs Committee Report.
    <bullet> Ad Hoc Committee Reports
    [cir] Emergency Transportable Housing--Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (vote).
    [cir] Election of Officers.
    [cir] Executive Director's Report.
    [cir] Public Comment, Open Topics.
    All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. An 
assistive listening system, computer assisted real-time transcription 
(CART), and sign language interpreters will be available at the Board 
meeting and committee meetings. Persons attending Board meetings are 
requested to refrain from using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances 
for the comfort of other participants (see http://www.access-board.gov/about/policies/fragrance.htm for more information).

David M. Capozzi,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-4246 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
Searched for **http://www.edtribalconsultations.org/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.edtribalconsultations.org/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary W. Douglass, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                      |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2008 |  | /s/ Gary W. Douglass
|                     |  | Name:                |  | Gary W. Douglass                     
|                     |  | Title:               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 20.200 What contact will the Bureau maintain with State, tribal, county, local, and other Federal agency programs?

We will coordinate all financial assistance and social services programs with state, tribal, county, local and other federal agency programs to ensure that the financial assistance and social services program avoids duplication of assistance.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

d0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147523

- 7 & (82)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147523

- 7

COA: 300212, 300264,

308204, 308205, 308212

GLEN PATRICK ANTHONY, Wayne CC: 10

- 000980

- FC,

Defendant

- Appellant. 09

- 020264

- FC, 09

- 019855

- FC,

09

- 019858

- FC, 09

- 019866

- FC

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the mot ion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The

application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is

considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of People v Earl (Docket No.

145677) is pending on appeal before th is Court and that the decision in that case may

resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the

application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
# C_2006331EN.01000402.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 28 November 2006 — European Parliament v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-414/04) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 - Conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity - Regulation (EC) No 1223/2004 - Temporary derogations in favour of Slovenia - Legal basis)

(2006/C 331/07)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: European Parliament, (represented by: A. Baas and U. Rösslein, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities, (represented by J. Sack and P. Van Nuffel, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Lopes Sabino and M. Bishop, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

(represented by:

)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Estonia, (represented by L. Uibo, Agent) Republic of Poland, represented by M. Węglarz, T. Nowakowski and T. Krawczyk, Agents

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1223/2004 of 28 June 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the date of application of certain provisions to Slovenia (OJ 2004 L 233, p. 3) — Legal basis

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls Council Regulation (EC) No 1223/2004 of 28 June 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the date of application of certain provisions to Slovenia; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls Council Regulation (EC) No 1223/2004 of 28 June 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the date of application of certain provisions to Slovenia;

| 2) | Maintains the effects of Regulation No 1223/2004 until the adoption, within a reasonable period, of a new regulation founded on an appropriate legal basis, without however prolonging those effects beyond 1 July 2007; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Maintains the effects of Regulation No 1223/2004 until the adoption, within a reasonable period, of a new regulation founded on an appropriate legal basis, without however prolonging those effects beyond 1 July 2007;

| 3) | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs;

| 4) | Orders the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Estonia and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4)

Orders the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Estonia and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 6.11.2004.

1

---
§ 88.1 Employment of attorneys. ( a ) Indian tribes organized pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 984; 25 U.S.C. 461-479), as amended, may employ legal counsel. The choice of counsel and the fixing of fees are subject under 25 U.S.C. 476 to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior or his authorized representative.
( b ) Attorneys may be employed by Indian tribes not organized under the Act of June 18, 1934, under contracts subject to approval under 25 U.S.C. 81 and the Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1950, 5 U.S.C. 481, note, by the Secretary of the Interior or his authorized representative.
( c ) Any action of the authorized representative of the Secretary of the Interior which approves, disapproves or conditionally approves a contract pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall be final.
( d ) Practice of such attorneys before the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Department of the Interior is subject to the requirements of 43 CFR 1.1 through 1.7.
[27 FR 11548, Nov. 24, 1962. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
### §8075. Bureau Chiefs: succession to duties

(a) When there is a vacancy in the office of chief of a bureau, or during the absence or disability of the chief of a bureau, the deputy chief of that bureau, unless otherwise directed by the President, shall perform the duties of the chief until a successor is appointed or the absence or disability ceases.

(b) When subsection (a) cannot be complied with because of the absence or disability of the deputy chief of the bureau, the heads of the major divisions of the bureau, in the order directed by the Secretary of the Navy, shall perform the duties of the chief, unless otherwise directed by the President.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 286, §5135; renumbered §8075, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(a)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5135(a) | 5 U.S.C. 445 (less 1st 43 words). | Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 417, 39 Stat. 558 (3d par., 45th through 95th words). |
| | 5 U.S.C. 446 (last 49 words). | Mar. 3, 1893, ch. 212, 27 Stat. 717 (1st par., last 53 words); May 13, 1942, ch. 303, §1, 56 Stat. 276. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 447 (25th through 74th words). | May 4, 1898, ch. 234, §1, 30 Stat. 373 (12th par., 41st through 92d words). |
| | 5 U.S.C. 448a. | June 20, 1940, ch. 400, §1(f), 54 Stat. 493. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 449 (last 51 words). | July 26, 1894, ch. 165, §1, 28 Stat. 132 (3d par., last 56 words); July 11, 1919, ch. 9, 41 Stat. 147 (1st proviso). |
| | 5 U.S.C. 452 (less 1st 35 words). | July 12, 1921, ch. 44, §8 (3d par., less 1st 35 words), 42 Stat. 140. |
| 5135(b) | 5 U.S.C. 432a (less applicability to JAG). | Feb. 3, 1942, ch. 35, §1 (less applicability to JAG), 56 Stat. 47. |

In subsection (a) all the provisions covering succession in case of the absence of the chiefs of the various bureaus are integrated and uniformly stated.

That part of 5 U.S.C. 448a, enacted in the Act of June 20, 1940, ch. 400, §1(f), 54 Stat. 493, relating to the succession by heads of major divisions of the Bureau of Ships is superseded by the Act of Feb. 3, 1942, ch. 35, §1 (5 U.S.C. 432a).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8075 was renumbered section 9075 of this title.

A prior section 8076, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 496, related to composition of Air Force Reserve, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §§1661(a)(3)(A), 1691, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2980, 3026, effective Dec. 1, 1994. See section 10110 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5135 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.