alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 290.12 What information must the tribal revenue allocation plan contain? ( a ) You must prepare a tribal revenue allocation plan that includes a percentage breakdown of the uses for which you will allocate net gaming revenues. The percentage breakdown must total 100 percent.
( b ) The tribal revenue allocation plan must meet the following criteria: ( 1 ) It must reserve an adequate portion of net gaming revenues from the tribal gaming activity for one or more of the following purposes: ( i ) To fund tribal government operations or programs;
( ii ) To provide for the general welfare of the tribe or its members;
( iii ) To promote tribal economic development;
( iv ) To donate to charitable organizations; or
( v ) To help fund operations of local government.
( 2 ) It must contain detailed information to allow the ABO to determine that it complies with this section and IGRA particularly regarding funding for tribal governmental operations or programs and for promoting tribal economic development.
( 3 ) It must protect and preserve the interests of minors and other legally incompetent persons who are entitled to receive per capita payments by: ( i ) Ensuring that tribes make per capita payments for eligible minors or incompetents to the parents or legal guardians of these minors or incompetents at times and in such amounts as necessary for the health, education, or welfare of the minor or incompetent;
( ii ) Establishing criteria for withdrawal of the funds, acceptable proof and/or receipts for accountability of the expenditure of the funds and the circumstances for denial of the withdrawal of the minors' and legal incompetents' per capita payments by the parent or legal guardian; and
( iii ) Establishing a process, system, or forum for dispute resolution.
( 4 ) It must describe how you will notify members of the tax liability for per capita payments and how you will withhold taxes for all recipients in accordance with IRS regulations in 26 CFR part 31.
( 5 ) It must authorize the distribution of per capita payments to members according to specific eligibility requirements and must utilize or establish a tribal court system, forum or administrative process for resolution of disputes concerning the allocation of net gaming revenues and the distribution of per capita payments.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-42 

July 2, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(7) Plans Covered. Foreign Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of June 13, 1975 asking whether the Canadian participants of the * * * pension

plan for officers and staff should be counted for insurance premium purposes. The Constitution of the * * * provides

that the Union's headquarters city is to be Portland, Oregon. Your letter also stated that due to the character of your

organization approximately half of the plan participants are Canadian. 

Section 4021(b)(7) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA" or the "Act") excludes from

coverage a plan "which is established and maintained outside of the United States primarily for the benefit of individuals

substantially all of whom are nonresident aliens." It appears from your letter that your situation is not within the ambit

of this exclusion. 

ERISA makes no distinction between plan participants on the basis of citizenship in setting forth the duties and

obligations of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC" or the "Corporation") to make "basic benefit"

payments to plan participants. The Canadian members of your pension plan are covered and your action in counting such

participants for [*2] insurance premium purposes was proper. 

I hope this information proves helpful to you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
SERVED: JULY 7, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AIRCAL, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-1324 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014WP910129) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

(\:_-;· ~A?iiY d a-~· .. ~ Roru . o er ,/" 

Chief Admi strative Law Jud~/ 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Leonardo Concepcion, President 

Aircal, Inc., Respondent 

6411 West Imperial Highway 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

FAX: 503-678-3374 

ONE COPY 

Kevin Sullivan, Respondent's Representative 

TEL: 714-844-2520 

MOBILE: 714-337-6912 

EMAILl: krs500@msn.com 

David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202~366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-1324 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Publications             
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeCareersERT Officer

 

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Leadership 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

## Contact Us

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-4433****Fax:**202-366-3666**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Associate Administrator for Administration

## Audrey L. Farley

In July 2018, Audrey L. Farley joined the Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) as the Associate Administrator for Administration. She joined PHMSA after serving as the Executive Director for the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R). As their senior career official, she provided executive leadership and oversight for headquarters program offices and two field locations: Volpe National Transportation Systems Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts and the Transportation Safety Institute in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

In November 2011, Audrey began her tenure with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) as the Associate Administrator for Administration in OST-R's predecessor organization the Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA).

Audrey joined the DOT after graduating from the SES Candidate Development Program at the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), where she was assigned to the Office of Capital Access. Prior to joining SBA, Audrey served as the Director of Administrative and Financial Services at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Audrey has over 30 years of Federal service and has been described as a true role model of perseverance and achievement. She began her career as a GS-2 with the U.S. General Services Administration, where she served for 21 years.

Audrey is a native of Washington, D.C. She is a member of the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials (COMTO), Women's Transportation Seminar (WTS), Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., Federal Executive Institute Alumni Association, Executive Women in Government, Senior Executives Association and the African American Federal Executive Association, where she currently serves on its Board of Directors and is a graduate of the AAFEA Fellows Program. She earned a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Maryland University College and a Masters degree in Public Administration from American University.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11331-11332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 516

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0534]
RIN 0910-AG58


New Animal Drugs for Minor Use and Minor Species; Confirmation of 
Effective Date

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is confirming the 
effective date of March 30, 2011, for the final rule that appeared in 
the Federal Register of November 15, 2010 (75 FR 69586). The direct 
final rule amends the regulations regarding new animal drugs for minor 
use and minor species (MUMS) to update language and clarify the intent 
of the regulations consistent with the preambles to the proposed and 
final rules. This document confirms the effective date of the direct 
final rule.

DATES: Effective date confirmed: March 30, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Meg Oeller, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine (HFV-50), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., 
Rockville, MD 20855, 240-276-9005, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82efe3f0e5e3f0e7f6acede7eeeee7f0c2e4e6e3aceaeaf1ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="167b776471776473623879737a7a736456707277387e7e6538717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of November 15, 2010 
(75 FR 69586), FDA solicited comments concerning the direct final rule 
for a 75-day period ending January 31, 2011. FDA stated that the 
effective date of the

[[Page 11332]]

direct final rule would be on March 30, 2011, 60 days after the end of 
the comment period, unless any significant adverse comment was 
submitted to FDA during the comment period. FDA did not receive any 
significant adverse comments.

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 360ccc-1, 360ccc-2, 371. Accordingly, the 
amendments issued thereby are effective.

    Dated: February 24, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4593 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 515.8 Requests for an accounting of record disclosure. ( a ) *How made and addressed.* Subject to the exceptions listed in paragraph (b) of this section, an individual may make a request for an accounting of the disclosures of any record about that individual that the Commission has made to another person, organization, or agency. The accounting contains the date, nature and purpose of each disclosure, as well as the name and address of the person, organization, or agency to which the disclosure was made. The request for an accounting should identify each particular record in question and should be made in writing to the Commission's Privacy Act Officer, following the procedures in § 515.3.
( b ) *Where accountings are not required.* The Commission is not required to provide an accounting where they relate to: ( 1 ) Disclosures for which accountings are not required to be kept, such as those that are made to employees of the Commission who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties and disclosures that are made under section 552 of title 5;
( 2 ) Disclosures made to law enforcement agencies for authorized law enforcement activities in response to written requests from those law enforcement agencies specifying the law enforcement activities for which the disclosures are sought; or
( 3 ) Disclosures made from law enforcement systems of records that have been exempted from accounting requirements.
( c ) *Appeals.* A requester may appeal a denial of a request for an accounting in the same manner as a denial of a request for access as described in § 515.7 of this part and the same procedures will be followed.
( d ) *Preservation of accountings.* All accountings made under this section will be retained for at least five years or the life of the record, whichever is longer, after the disclosure for which the accounting is made.
#### § 89.34 Tentative form of contract.

The principal officer of any one of the Choctaw, Cherokee, Creek, Seminole, and Chickasaw Tribes may, if he desires, obtain a tentative form of contract by written application to the office of the appropriate Agency Superintendent. Requests for forms for an attorney contract should include a statement reciting whether the attorney is desired as a general legal counsel in connection with the business of the tribe or as counsel in respect to specific problems on which legal counsel is desired, or specific matters requiring representation in court or before committees of Congress and the Departments of Government. Requests for forms for technical service contracts should include a statement of the particular type of service required and the purpose for which it is needed. The anticipated term of each proposed contract should be stated.

[37 FR 10440, May 23, 1972. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
§ 63.34 How are Indian child protection and family violence prevention program funds distributed? ( a ) Funds will be distributed, subject to the availability of appropriations, and: ( 1 ) In any fiscal year that the appropriation exceeds 50 percent of the level of funding authorized for this purpose by the Act, 49 percent must be distributed equally to all tribes and tribal organizations and 49 percent must be distributed on a per capita basis according to the population of children residing in the service area. Two percent of the annual appropriation will be set aside for distribution to tribes demonstrating special circumstances.
( 2 ) In any fiscal year that the appropriation does not exceed 50 percent of the level of funding authorized for this purpose by the Act, funding must be distributed in equal amounts to all tribes. Two percent of the annual appropriation will be set aside for distribution to tribes demonstrating special circumstances.
( 3 ) Special circumstances include but are not limited to a high incidence of child sexual abuse, a high incidence of violent crimes, a high incidence of violent crimes against women, or the existence of a significant victim population within the community. ( i ) This 2 percent will be subject to discretionary distribution by the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, or his or her designee. Tribes may request these funds through their respective area offices. All requests must demonstrate a high incidence of child sexual abuse, a high incidence of violent crimes, a high incidence of violent crimes against women, or the existence of a significant victim population within the community.
( ii ) Special circumstances funds will remain available through the third quarter of each fiscal year. In the fourth quarter, unallocated special circumstances funds will be redistributed as set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, except that there will be no additional set aside for special circumstances.
( b ) Any tribe not wishing to receive Indian child protection and family violence prevention funds must inform its respective area office in writing within 90 days after receiving notice of the allocation from the area office. Each area office may reallocate unused Indian child protection and family violence prevention program funds as provided in this section.
( c ) Funds may be used as matching shares for other federally funded programs which contribute to and promote prevention of child abuse, child neglect, and family violence on Indian reservations, but may not be used to supplant funds available for the same general purposes.
( d ) Any income resulting from the operation of Indian child protection and family violence prevention programs may be retained and used to promote prevention of child abuse, child neglect, and family violence on Indian reservations.
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Armand Dauplaise, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bio-One Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on r my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



     Date:   August 6, 2003            /S/  Armand Dauplaise
                                       --------------------------
                                       Armand Dauplaise
                                       Chief Executive Officer,
                                       President and Director
### [§2467. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title III, §322(b)(1), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 59]

Section, added Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title III, §331(a), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 1957; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title III, §342(a), (b)(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 569; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title X, §1048(a)(22), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1224, related to cost comparisons: inclusion of retirement costs; consultation with employees; waiver of comparison.
#### § 89.30 Contents and approval of contracts.

All contracts for the services of legal counsel or technical specialists negotiated and executed with the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Cherokee, Creek, or Seminole Tribes or Nations, also known as the Five Civilized Tribes, shall be in strict compliance with the requirements of section 2103 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (25 U.S.C. 81).

[37 FR 10440, May 23, 1972. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Daryl Dean Pinney, appellant.

226 N. W. 2d 630

Filed March 6, 1975.

No. 39665.

*274George E. Brugh, for appellant.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Marilyn B. Hutchinson, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.

McCown, J.

In January of 1974, in the District Court for York County, the defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of burglary. On March 22, 1974, the defendant was placed on probation for a period of 2 years under the usual probation conditions. On April 17, 1974, the defendant was convicted and sentenced in the District Court for Platte County to consecutive terms in the county jail for assault and battery and minor in possession. On June 20, 1974, after defendant had waived hearing on a motion to revoke probation, the District Court for York County found that the defendant had violated the terms of the probation order and sentenced him to 1 to 2 years imprisonment on the original burglary conviction. The only issue here is whether or not the sentence was excessive.

The statutory range of sentence for imprisonment in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex in this case was from 1 to 10 years. The record and the presentence report indicate that the original burglary charge on which the defendant was convicted and sentenced here was only one of two counts, one of which was dismissed pursuant to a plea bargain. The record also indicates that before the entry of the original probation order, the defendant was committed to the Division of Corrections for evaluation pursuant to the terms of section 83-1,105(3), R. S. Supp., 1974. That report recommended against probation but the probation here was thereafter granted. Defendant’s prior record establishes that as a minor, he was found guilty of breaking and entering, as well as numerous misdemeanor violations. *275He was also absent without leave from the military service at the time of his violation of the conditions of probation.

A sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal unless an abuse of discretion appears in the record. State v. Palmer, 191 Neb. 540, 216 N. W. 2d 178. There was no abuse of discretion here.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.