alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-36 

November 9, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043(b)(8) Reportable Events. Mergers, Consolidations & other Transfers of Plan Assets

4062 Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans

4064 Liability of Employers in Multiple Employer & Multiemployer Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request for an opinion concerning the applicability of Sections 4062 and 4064 of the

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") to an employer which has sold the stock of a subsidiary

which in turn will establish a new pension plan. 

As you have represented the facts, A Inc. (A) * * * was a wholly-owned subsidiary of B Inc. (B). Certain employees

of B and of A participated in the Salaried Retirement Plan for Employees of B Inc. (the B Plan"). 

Effective January 30, 1981, A sold all of the stock of A to C Corp., an unrelated entity. A was then renamed D Inc.

(D) and D's employees ceased to participate in the B Plan. Under the sales agreement, D will establish a new plan (the

D Plan"). Service recognized under the B Plan for vesting and benefit accrual purposes will also be credited for those

purposes under the D Plan. All former A employees will receive under the D Plan treatment for accrual and vesting

purposes at least equal [*2] to that which they would have received under the B Plan. 

As of January 1, 1981, the assets of the B Plan exceeded its liabilities by approximately $9,000,000. Pursuant to

the sales agreement, certain of those assets and liabilities will be transferred to the D Plan. The liabilities to be

transferred are those attributable to A employees. The assets transferred will equal the amount required to fund, as of

the date of the sale, 107.81 percent of benefits accrued by A employees, plus interest at the annual rate of eight percent

from the date of the sale. A notice of a reportable event was filed with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the

"PBGC") by B Pursuant to Section 4043(b)(8) of ERISA on July 20, 1981. 

 You requested our opinion as to the possible liability of B to the PBGC in the event of termination by D of the D

Plan or a cessation by D of operations at any facility which results in the separation from employment of more than 20

percent of the D Plan's active participants. 

Based on your representation as to the sufficiency of the B Plan on January 31, 1981, the date of the sale, B will have

no continuing liability for the D Plan to the PBGC pursuant to Sections [*3] 4062 or 4064 of ERISA after the sale in

the event of the termination of the D Plan or the cessation of operations by D at any facility. 

I hope I have been of assistance. If you have any questions, please contact the attorney assigned to this matter, at

(202) 254-3010. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 97 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 97

      Calling upon Haiti's political leaders to seek agreement on 
 transparent, free, and widely participatory elections, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1999

  Mr. Conyers (for himself, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Clyburn, Mr. Dixon, Ms. 
  Brown of Florida, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Owens, Ms. 
 Waters, and Mr. Payne) submitted the following resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Calling upon Haiti's political leaders to seek agreement on 
 transparent, free, and widely participatory elections, and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas Haiti has been without a functioning government since June 1997, because 
        Haiti's political leaders have failed to come to agreement on a prime 
        minister and have failed to resolve the contested April 1997 elections;
Whereas this lack of a functioning government and of a willingness to compromise 
        has hindered the flow of international assistance to and increased the 
        suffering of the Haitian people;
Whereas this suffering has drained the Haitian people's confidence in democracy 
        and eroded international goodwill for Haiti;
Whereas the House of Representatives is concerned that the political impasse 
        between President Preval and the Parliament is having an adverse effect 
        on democracy in Haiti and may adversely influence the independence of 
        the Haitian national police;
Whereas the murder of Senator Jean-Yvon Toussaint on March 1, 1999, contributes 
        to a climate of insecurity and mistrust; and
Whereas any replacement of elected local officials threatens to undermine the 
        ability of Haiti to conduct fully free and fair elections: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) calls on Haiti's political leaders to seek compromise 
        and agreement in order to form a nonpartisan, professional, and 
        competent provisional electoral council that can convene 
        transparent, free, and widely participatory elections as soon 
        as practically possible; and
            (2) affirms the commitment made by the United Nations to 
        support only an electoral process that is free and fair and 
        open to participation by all of Haiti's political and civil 
        society leaders.
                                 <all>
```
#### Herman Seider v. John F. Cronin, Impleaded.

Motion granted,- with ten dollars costs. ■
Part II, Section A. 1(d) 

NCS TS-11KK6F MANUFACTURING

Redacted
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOS International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allan J. Ligi, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\
|---

|Allan J. Ligi
|-------------

|Allan J. LigiPresident and Principal Executive Officer
|------------------------------------------------------

|May 15, 2006
|------------

---
### SI()-|()():,()4-()4 6



# WESTER N WISCONSIN' S FINES TAVIATIO N FACILITY Mf^^ ^

Februar y24,201 0 285 0 Airpor tRoad Phon e (606)789-7464 La Crosse , W l 54603-126 4 Fa x(608-789-746 9 Ass l Airpor

t Manage r Clinto n R . Toi p AVIATIO N BOAR D Joh n J . Satory , Ctiairma n Chri s E . Olson , Vic e Chairma n Caro l Krat z Jo n M . Olso n Thoma s T . Rau k Eugen e G . Roesle r Jerom e H . Rusc h Michae l J . Scalett a

Th e Honorabl e Raymon d H . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen to fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve , SE Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2010-003 4 Dea rIVIr , Secretary ; Than k yo u fo rth e opportunit yt o expres s m ysuppor t fo rth e applicatio n fo rantitrus t immunit yan d propose d join tbusines s agreemen tfile d b yAmerica n Airline s an d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo rth e oneworl d allianc e t o compet e effectivel ywit h th e Sta ran d SkyTea m alliances . Thi s increase d allianc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o fth e Department' s Ope n Skie s policy-firs tb ysolidifyin g U.S . -Japa n Ope n Skies , the n b yservin g a s a foundatio n fo rfurthe rliberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte ra review , I encourag e th e Departmen to fTransportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel ytogethe rt o delive rhighl ycompetitiv e ai r transportatio n services . Approva l fo rAA/JA Lallianc e wil l hav e a positiv e Impac t o n ai rtrave l b yofferin g customer s mor e service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an d wil l hel p t o ensur e tha t customer s continu e t o benefi tfro m th e competitio n afforde d b ythre e competitiv e ai ralliances . I urg e yo u t o quickl yapprov e thi s application . Respectfull ysubmitted , 

# >i^uLttJ ^ Da n Wruc k Airpor t Manage r
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 245 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 15, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 1691) to protect religious liberty. The bill shall be considered as read 
for amendment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now 
printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) a further 
amendment printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule 
XVIII, if offered by Representative Conyers of Michigan or his designee, which 
shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE

              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2006 of KeySpan  Corporation  (the  "Corporation"),  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gerald
Luterman,   Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial   Officer  of  the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:       May 4, 2006


                                                  /s/ Gerald Luterman
                                                  -------------------
                                                  Gerald Luterman
                                                  Executive Vice President
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer
### [§2249a. Renumbered §361]
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 492

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of America’s

teachers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 2000

Ms. GRANGER (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. DEMINT, Mr.

TANCREDO, Mr. BURR of North Carolina, Mr. ROGAN, Mr. PHELPS, Mr.

PAUL, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. JENKINS,

Ms. SANCHEZ, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. BACA, Mr.

HINOJOSA, Mr. DEUTSCH, and Mr. HILLEARY) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the

Workforce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in

support of America’s teachers.

Whereas the foundation of American freedom and democracy

is a strong, effective system of education in which every

child can learn in a safe and nurturing environment;

Whereas a first-rate education system depends on a partnership between parents, principals, teachers, and children;

Whereas much of the success of our Nation during the American Century is the result of the hard work and dedication of teachers across the land;
2

•HRES 492 IH

Whereas, in addition to their families, knowledgeable and

skillful teachers can have a profound impact on a child’s

early development and future success;

Whereas, while many people spend their lives building careers, teachers spend their careers building lives;

Whereas our Nation’s teachers serve our children beyond the

call of duty as coaches, mentors, and advisors without regard to fame or fortune; and

Whereas across this land nearly 3 million men and women experience the joys of teaching young minds the virtues of

reading, writing, and arithmetic: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) honors and recognizes the unique and im3 portant achievements of America’s teachers; and

4 (2) urges all Americans to take a moment to

5 thank and pay tribute to our Nation’s teachers.

Æ
§ 39.801 What is the formula to determine the amount necessary to sustain a school's academic or residential program? ( a ) The Secretary's formula to determine the minimum annual amount necessary to sustain a Bureau-funded school's academic or residential program is as follows: Student Unit Value × Weighted Student Unit = Annual Minimum Amount per student.
( b ) Sections 39.802 through 39.807 explain the derivation of the formula in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) If the annual minimum amount calculated under this section and §§ 39.802 through 39.807 is not fully funded, OIEP will pro rate funds distributed to schools using the Indian School Equalization Formula.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby
made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CW Capital Asset Management LLC, as Special
Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying
Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2012-LC4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section
10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during
the period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been
made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th day of March 2014.



_____________________

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### Amos *v.*Daggett et al.

[No. 12,070.

Filed February 19, 1925.]

*Appeal.—Appellate tribunal will not. weigh conflicting, evidence, and where there is some evidence to support judgment, it will be*affirmed.—An appellate tribunal will not weigh the evidence, and where on a conflict, there is some evidence to sustain the claim of the judgment plaintiff, the judgment will be affirmed.

From Howard Circuit Court; *John Marshall,*Judge.

Actions by Charles Daggett and Clarence Daggett against Steve J. Amos and Fred Goodnight, which were consolidated. From judgments for plaintiffs, the defendant Amos appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*491
      *Joseph P. Herron,*for appellants.

*Homer R. Miller*and *Rex E. Ballenger,*for appellees.

Nichols, J.

Appellant purchased hogs of appellee Clarence Daggett of the value of $347.48 and of appellee Charles Daggett of the value of $421.24 giving checks respectively for said sums, signed: “Fred Goodnight (Printed), By S. J. Amos (Signed).”

These checks proved to be absolutely worthless and each of the appellees brought suit against appellant and Goodnight for the value of his hogs. The actions were consolidated, and there was a trial by the court with finding and judgment in favor of each of the appellees. The only error assigned is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for new trial, which presents the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision of the court. Appellant contends that he was only the agent of a disclosed principal, and, as such, was not liable, while appellee contends that Goodnight and appellant were partners. There is some evidence to sustain appellee’s contention and, under such circumstances, this court does not weigh it.

Affirmed.
October 23, 2015

Ruben Balter

3631 Monterosa Drive

Altadena

, C A 91001

Dear Mr. Balter :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not pr ocess your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your June 22 , 2015 exemption request filed in D ocket No. FAA

- 20 15

- 33 4 3 , but

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition do es no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, a nd the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption , please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html

. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to proc ess your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not H ear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspac e Rules Division

Enclosure s34
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-56 

July 22, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043(b)(3) Reportable Events. Decrease in Participants 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of July 9, 1975 in which you requested an interpretation of the term "active

participants" in Section 4043(b)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("the Act"). You

specifically asked whether such term includes retirees, terminated employees with vested rights, disability retirees or

active employees who, by reason of age and/or service, were ineligible to become participants in a pension plan. You

previously discussed this question with * * * of my staff, and this letter confirms what he told you, viz., that the term

"active participants" in Section 4043(b)(3) of the Act does not include retirees, terminated employees with vested rights,

disability retirees or active employees who, by reason of age and/or service, were ineligible to become participants in

a pension plan. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### § 1000.391 Can a Tribe/Consortium employee be detailed to a Federal service position?

Yes, under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act, 25 U.S.C. 48, or other applicable law, when permitted by the Secretary.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-65 

May 9, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041 Termination by Plan Administrator 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of April 23, 1975 in which you questioned the position of the Pension Benefit

Guaranty Corporation (the "Corporation") with respect to the allowability of certain payments from pension funds

subsequent to the filing of a notice of termination and prior to the Corporations's taking official action with respect to

such notice. Specifically you stated that the trustees of a number of plans for which your firm furnishes actuarial and

administrative services have refused to pay your fees for such services on the basis that they may make no disbursements

from pension funds without the authorization of this Corporation. This position is not consistent with the policy of this

Corporation. 

Pursuant to Section 4041 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, within the 90-day period (or

such extended period, as the case may be) following the proposed date of termination a plan administrator may not pay

any amount pursuant to the termination procedure of the plan until he receives the authorization of the Corporation to

do so. However, this prohibition does not extend to other payments which are not made [*2] pursuant to the plan

termination procedure. For instance, benefit payments may continue to be made to participants who were already

receiving such payments as of the proposed date of termination. Likewise, it is permissible for a trustee to continue to

pay the normal administrative expenses of a plan, such as your fees for actuarial and administrative services rendered.

We hope this repsonse is helpful to you. 

Steven E. Schanes 

Acting Executive Director