alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 547.9 What are the minimum technical standards for Class II gaming system accounting functions? ( a ) *Required accounting data.* The following minimum accounting data, however named, must be maintained by the Class II gaming system: ( 1 ) Amount In: The total value of all financial instruments and cashless transactions accepted by the Class II gaming system. Each type of financial instrument accepted by the Class II gaming system must be tracked independently per financial instrument acceptor, and as required by applicable requirements of TGRA regulations that meet or exceed the minimum internal control standards at 25 CFR part 543.
( 2 ) Amount Out: The total value of all financial instruments and cashless transactions paid by the Class II gaming system, plus the total value of attendant pay. Each type of financial instrument paid by the Class II Gaming System must be tracked independently per financial instrument dispenser, and as required by applicable requirements of TGRA regulations that meet or exceed the minimum internal control standards at 25 CFR part 543.
( b ) *Accounting data storage.* If the Class II gaming system electronically maintains accounting data: ( 1 ) Accounting data must be stored with at least eight decimal digits.
( 2 ) Credit balances must have sufficient digits to accommodate the design of the game.
( 3 ) Accounting data displayed to the player may be incremented or decremented using visual effects, but the internal storage of this data must be immediately updated in full.
( 4 ) Accounting data must be updated upon the occurrence of the relevant accounting event.
( 5 ) Modifications to accounting data must be recorded, including the identity of the person(s) making the modifications, and be reportable by the Class II gaming system.
( c ) *Rollover.* Accounting data that rolls over to zero must not corrupt data.
( d ) *Credit balance display and function.* ( 1 ) Any credit balance maintained at the player interface must be prominently displayed at all times except: ( i ) In audit, configuration, recall and test modes; or
( ii ) Temporarily, during entertaining displays of game results.
( 2 ) Progressive prizes may be added to the player's credit balance provided that: ( i ) The player credit balance is maintained in dollars and cents;
( ii ) The progressive accounting data is incremented in number of credits; or
( iii ) The prize in dollars and cents is converted to player credits or transferred to the player's credit balance in a manner that does not mislead the player or cause accounting imbalances.
( 3 ) If the player credit balance displays in credits, but the actual balance includes fractional credits, the Class II gaming system must display the fractional credit when the player credit balance drops below one credit.
#### § 81.12 What type of electioneering is allowed before and during Secretarial election?

There shall be no electioneering within 50 feet of the entrance of a polling site.
### [§685. Renumbered §12317]
# C_2006249EN.01001002.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/10

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 2 August 2006 — Aughinish Alumina Ltd v Commission

(Case T-69/06 R)

(Application for interim measures - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - State aid - Urgency)

(2006/C 249/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aughinish Alumina Ltd (Askeaton, Ireland) (represented by: J. Handoll and C. Waterson, solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Khan and K. Walkerová, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision 2006/323/EC of 7 December 2005 concerning the exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production in Gardanne, in the Shannon region and in Sardinia, respectively implemented by France, Ireland and Italy (OJ 2006 L 119, p. 12) in so far as it relates to the applicant

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer



---

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, William A. Donius, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                       |  |                                                
|----------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2006 |  | /s/ William A. Donius
|                  |  | Name:                 |  | William A. Donius                              
|                  |  | Title:                |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

___________________

NO. 09-13-00514-CR

___________________

MARCUS JARMAIN BOLDEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 05-95100

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this appeal, counsel for Marcus Jarmain Bolden, the appellant, filed a 

brief stating that there are no arguable points of error that would allow Bolden to 

obtain relief from his conviction. After reviewing the record, we agree that no 

arguable issues support Bolden’s appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967).

In carrying out a plea agreement, Bolden pled guilty to an indictment issued 

in 2005 alleging that in 2004, Bolden had improperly labeled recordings, a felony.
2

See Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 35.94.1 Under the terms of Bolden’s plea 

agreement, the trial court deferred pronouncing Bolden guilty; instead, the trial 

court placed Bolden on community supervision for five years. Subsequently, by 

motion, the State asked the trial court to revoke its community supervision order 

and find Bolden guilty of the crime of improper labeling of recordings. After a 

hearing, the trial court found that Bolden violated four of the terms in the trial 

court’s deferred adjudication order, revoked Bolden’s unadjudicated probation, 

found Bolden guilty of having improperly labeled the recordings, and assessed a 

sentence of two years in prison. 

On appeal, Bolden’s counsel filed a brief presenting counsel’s professional 

evaluation of the record. The brief contains counsel’s conclusion that Bolden’s 

appeal is frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978). We granted an extension of time to allow Bolden to file a 

pro se brief, but he did not do so. 

After reviewing the appellate record and the trial court’s judgment, we agree 

with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues support Bolden’s appeal. 

Therefore, we need not order the appointment of new counsel to re-brief Bolden’s 

 1

Section 35.94 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code was repealed in 

2009. See Act of May 22, 1989, 71st Leg., R.S., ch. 339, § 1, sec. 35.94, 1989 Tex. 

Gen. Laws 1305, 1307, repealed by Act of May 15, 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., ch. 885, 

§ 2.47(a)(1), 2007 Tex. Gen. Laws 1905, 2082.
3

appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

Because no arguable issues support Bolden’s appeal, we affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.2

AFFIRMED.

___________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

Submitted on April 15, 2014

Opinion Delivered May 14, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

 2

Bolden may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
#### Charles Brown and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Edna B. Way and Lydia B. Scherer, Plaintiffs, v. Harriet B. Packard, Defendant, and Noah L. Bishop, Individually and as Executor, etc., of Edward Brown, Deceased, Impleaded in the Place of The Locomotive Engineers’ Mutual Life and Accident Insurance Association, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred.
GLOBAL

 

(logo) TRIMONT®

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

For the reporting periodJanuary 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019

(the “Reporting Period”)

 

COMM 2012-CCRE2,

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, COMM 2012-CCRE2

 

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the above referenced transaction:

 

As authorized Officer ofTRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC as Certifying Servicer with respect to the ReportingPeriod a review of the activities of the Certifying Servicer during the periodand its performance under the Trust and Servicing Agreement has been made undersuch Officer’s supervision.

 

To the best of such Officer’sknowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled itsobligations under the Trust and Servicing Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date: 10th day of February-2020

 

**TRIMONT REAL ESTATEADVISORS, LLC**

** **

By: /s/ Robert Brasfield

Robert Brasfield

Authorized Signatory

 

AMSTERDAM ǀ ATLANTA ǀDALLAS ǀ KANSAS CITY ǀ LONDON ǀ LOS ANGELES ǀ NEW YORK ǀSYDNEY
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; R01 grant review (03).                    

*Date:*                         March 7, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maryline Laude-Sharp, PhD, Scientific  Review Officer, National Institute on Minority Health and Health  Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite  800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-9536,                         *mlaudesharp@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

Dated: February 24, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4636 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### East-trending structural lineaments in central Nevada

By: E.B. EkrenR.C. BucknamW. J. CarrG. L. DixonW. D. Quinlivan

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp986

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2007010EN.01000202.xml

| 16.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4492 — Candover/Ferretti)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 10/04)

On 20 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4492. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4492. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
§ 11.3 Code of Federal Regulations. ( a ) The subscription price for a complete set of the Code of Federal Regulations is $1,019 per year for the bound, paper format. Those prices exclude postage. The prevailing postal rates will be applied to orders according to the delivery method requested. The Government Publishing Office (GPO) sells individual volumes of the paper format of the Code of Federal Regulations at prices determined by the Superintendent of Documents under the general direction of the Administrative Committee.
( b ) The online format of the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO websites.
[87 FR 80002, Dec. 29, 2022]
#### § 700.61 Fair market value.

Fair market value shall mean the value placed on the habitation and improvements owned by each head of household as determined pursuant to §§ 700.117 through 700.121.
#### § 601.28 Dispute resolution.

Any disputes arising under this part, shall be resolved, unless otherwise otherwise provided by law or regulation by the parties through interagency, good faith negotiations starting at the working levels of each agency, and if necessary, by elevating such disputes within the respective Agencies. If resolution at higher levels is unsuccessful, the parties may participate in mediation.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.156 What happens after the informal conference? ( a ) Within 10 days of the informal conference, the person who conducted the informal conference shall prepare and mail to the Indian tribe or tribal organization a written report which summarizes what happened at the informal conference and a recommended decision.
( b ) Every report of an informal conference shall contain the following language:
Within 30 days of the receipt of this recommended decision, you may file an appeal of the initial decision of the DOI or DHHS agency with the Interior Board of Indian Appeals (IBIA) under 25 CFR 900.158. You may request a hearing on the record. An appeal to the IBIA under 25 CFR 900.158 shall be filed with the IBIA by certified mail or hand delivery at the following address: Board of Indian Appeals, U.S. Department of the Interior, 801 North Quincy Street, Arlington, VA 22203. You shall serve copies of your Notice of Appeal on the Secretary and on the official whose decision is being appealed. You shall certify to the IBIA that you have served these copies.
[61 FR 32501, June 24, 1996, as amended at 75 FR 31701, June 4, 2010]
§ 158.401 Strategic talent planning process. ( a ) *Purpose.* On an ongoing basis, the Secretary or designee engages in a strategic talent planning process to ensure CTMS adapts to changes in cybersecurity work, the cybersecurity talent market, and the DHS cybersecurity mission.
( b ) *Process.* The Secretary or designee establishes and administers a strategic talent planning process that comprises: ( 1 ) Identifying DHS-CS cybersecurity work and CTMS qualifications based on the DHS cybersecurity mission as described in § 158.402;
( 2 ) Analyzing the cybersecurity talent market as described in § 158.403;
( 3 ) Describing and valuing DHS-CS cybersecurity work under the work valuation system described in § 158.404; and
( 4 ) Ensuring CTMS administration and DHS-CS management is continually informed by current, relevant information as described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Informing CTMS administration and DHS-CS management.* The Secretary or designee aggregates information generated in the processes described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section and information from administering CTMS, and uses that aggregated information to inform all other CTMS processes, systems, and programs under this part.
UAV No Fly Zone:

Built into the software of the DJI Phantom 2 and Inspire 1 that will not allow the UAV to operate in a 

Category A or Category B Airspace. Also in the software is safety Item that will only allow the height of 

394 feet of the UAV.

Attached is the UAV No-Fly zone for Michigan
§ 30.124 How will the Secretary implement continued support for Bureau-funded schools and school improvement? ( a ) The Secretary will establish exit criteria for: ( 1 ) Schools identified for comprehensive support and improvement, which, if not satisfied within a BIE-determined number of years (not to exceed four (4) years), will result in more rigorous BIE-determined action, such as implementation of interventions (which may include addressing school-level operations); and
( 2 ) Schools identified for additional targeted support, which, if not satisfied within a BIE-determined number of years, will, in the case of schools receiving Title I funds, result in identification of the school by the BIE for comprehensive support and improvement.
( b ) The Secretary will also periodically review resource allocation to support school improvement.
### §1580a. Emergency essential employees: notification of required participation in anthrax vaccine immunization program

The Secretary of Defense shall—

(1) prescribe regulations for the purpose of ensuring that any civilian employee of the Department of Defense who is determined to be an emergency essential employee and who is required to participate in the anthrax vaccine immunization program is notified of the requirement to participate in the program and the consequences of a decision not to participate; and

(2) ensure that any individual who is being considered for a position as such an employee is notified of the obligation to participate in the program before being offered employment in such position.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title VII, §751(c)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–194.)
120 STAT. 2766 PUBLIC LAW 109–414—DEC. 18, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 4073:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 6, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–414

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs located

in Farmington, Missouri, as the ‘‘Robert Silvey Department of Veterans Affairs

Outpatient Clinic’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT SILVEY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

OUTPATIENT CLINIC.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The outpatient clinic of the Department of

Veterans Affairs located in Farmington, Missouri, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Robert Silvey Department of Veterans

Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Robert Silvey Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient

Clinic’’.

Approved December 18, 2006.

Dec. 18, 2006

[S. 4073]
#### STATE v. MILLS

No. 139P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 507

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.
Order entered March 21, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00043 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., A CHILD On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC - 20 - 00975 - X

O RDER Before the Court is Father ’s March 18, 2022 motion for a ten

- day extension of time to file his appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than March 30, 2022.

/s/ C RAIG SMITH JUSTICE