alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1017

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the State ceiling

on the low-income housing credit.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 12, 1999

Mr. MACK (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. SARBANES, Mr.

CHAFEE, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. JEFFORDS,

Mr. KERREY, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. ROBB, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CONRAD, Mr.

SHELBY, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. DODD, Mr. GRAMS, Mr.

JOHNSON, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr.

HELMS, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. SESSIONS,

Mrs. BOXER, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr.

WELLSTONE, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. DORGAN,

Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. KERRY, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the State ceiling on the low-income housing credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Affordable Housing

5 Opportunity Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 1017 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN STATE CEILING ON LOW-INCOME

2 HOUSING CREDIT.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 42(h)(3)(C)

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to State

5 housing credit ceiling) is amended by striking ‘‘$1.25’’ and

6 inserting ‘‘$1.75’’.

7 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATE CEILING FOR IN8 CREASES IN COST-OF-LIVING.—Paragraph (3) of section

9 42(h) of such Code (relating to housing credit dollar

10 amount for agencies) is amended by adding at the end

11 the following new subparagraph:

12 ‘‘(H) COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT.—

13 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a

14 calendar year after 2000, the dollar

15 amount contained in subparagraph (C)(i)

16 shall be increased by an amount equal to—

17 ‘‘(I) such dollar amount, multi18 plied by

19 ‘‘(II) the cost-of-living adjust20 ment determined under section 1(f)(3)

21 for such calendar year by substituting

22 ‘calendar year 1999’ for ‘calendar

23 year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) there24 of.

25 ‘‘(ii) ROUNDING.—If any increase

26 under clause (i) is not a multiple of 5
3

•S 1017 IS

1 cents, such increase shall be rounded to

2 the next lowest multiple of 5 cents.’’.

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to calendar years after 1999.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11508-11509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[2280-665]


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations and Related Actions

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing or related actions in the National Register were received by 
the National Park Service before January 22, 2011. Pursuant to 
Sec. Sec.  60.13 or 60.15 of 36 CFR part 60, written comments are being 
accepted concerning the significance of the nominated properties under 
the National Register criteria for evaluation. Comments may be 
forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280, 
Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, 
Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed 
comments should be submitted by March 17, 2011.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

LOUISIANA

Orleans Parish

Straight University Boarding House and Dining Hall, 1423 N Claiborne 
Ave, New Orleans, 11000074

Ouachita Parish

Miller--Roy Building, 1001 Desiard St, Monroe, 11000075

[[Page 11509]]

Sabine Parish

Pleasant Hill Battlefield Historic District, Near junction of ST HWY 
175 and 177, Pelican, 11000072

SOUTH CAROLINA

Beaufort County

Sams Tabby Complex (38BU581), (Historic Resources of St. Helena 
Island c. 1740-c. 1935 MPS) S end of Datha Island at Mink's Pt near 
Jenkins Cr, Frogmore, 11000073

[FR Doc. 2011-4671 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
#### § 215.17 Additional information required.

Corporations, with their first application, must file one certified copy of articles of incorporation and, if a foreign corporation, evidence showing compliance with local corporation laws; also a list showing officers and stockholders, with post-office addresses and number of shares held by each. Statements of any changes of officers or any changes or additions of stockholders must be furnished to the Indian superintendent on January 1 of each year and at any time when requested. The right is reserved to the Secretary of the Interior to require of individual stockholders affidavits setting forth in what companies or with what persons or firms they are interested in lead and zinc mining leases, or land under the jurisdiction of the Quapaw Indian Agency, and whether they hold such stock for themselves or in trust. Evidence must also be given in a single affidavit (Form I) by the Secretary of the company or by the president of said company, showing authority of the officers of the company to execute the lease, bond, and other papers.
-  Home 
-  171 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 171.16

## Section §171.16: Detailed hazardous materials incident reports

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View section 171.16 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 90 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 90

 Recognizing the ``Code Adam'' child safety program, commending retail 
   business establishments that have implemented programs to protect 
children from abduction, and urging retail business establishments that 
        have not implemented such program to consider doing so.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

 Mr. Pallone submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the ``Code Adam'' child safety program, commending retail 
   business establishments that have implemented programs to protect 
children from abduction, and urging retail business establishments that 
        have not implemented such program to consider doing so.

Whereas protecting children is one of society's greatest responsibilities;
Whereas child abduction, an unconscionable and horrendous crime, seems to be 
        increasing in frequency;
Whereas parents, and all other adults, must be ever vigilant in public places to 
        protect children, who by their very nature are trusting and 
        unsuspecting, from those depraved and vile individuals who would prey on 
        them;
Whereas recognizing the risk of child abduction, some retail business 
        establishments have developed safety procedures and programs designed to 
        prevent abductors from using crowds of shoppers as cover for nefarious 
        acts;
Whereas one of the most successful programs to prevent child abduction is the 
        ``Code Adam'' alarm developed and implemented by Wal-Mart stores and 
        SAM'S Clubs throughout the Nation; and
Whereas, named in tribute to 6-year-old Adam Walsh who was abducted from a 
        shopping mall in the State of Florida and murdered in 1981, the ``Code 
        Adam'' alarm signals that there is a missing child and alerts all sales 
        personnel in the affected retail business establishment to abandon their 
        normal responsibilities and, in a coordinated and prearranged organized 
        manner, to begin searching for the child and monitoring the 
        establishment exits to ensure that the child is not removed from the 
        establishment: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the ``Code 
Adam'' child safety program, commends all retail business 
establishments that have implemented such program to protect children 
from abduction, and urges retail business establishments that have not 
implemented such program to consider doing so.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.147 What appeal rights are available?

If the Secretary denies a waiver request, the Indian tribe or tribal organization has the right to appeal the decision and request a hearing on the record under the procedures for hearings and appeals contained in subpart L of these regulations. Alternatively, the Indian tribe or tribal organization may sue in Federal district court to challenge the Secretary's action.
### §1148. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(59), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4685

Section, act July 21, 1932, ch. 520, §201(e), 47 Stat. 713; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §5(a), 50 Stat. 704; June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title II, §206, 61 Stat. 208, authorized the creation of regional agricultural credit corporations within the farm credit districts.
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.177 Does the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) apply to appeals under this subpart?

Yes. EAJA claims against DOI or HHS will be heard under 43 CFR 4.601 through 4.628. For HHS, appeals from an EAJA award will be according to 25 CFR 900.165(b).

[75 FR 31701, June 4, 2010]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 611 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 5, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill (S. 
2311) to revise and extend the Ryan White CARE Act programs under title XXVI of 
the Public Health Service Act, to improve access to health care and the quality 
of care under such programs, and to provide for the development of increased 
capacity to provide health care and related support services to individuals and 
families with HIV disease, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered 
as read for amendment. The amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in 
the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII shall 
be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 
on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 
one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Commerce; and (2) 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EX-33.2
MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE

Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or "Company") is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item l122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Management has determined that the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and
for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain
privately-issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required
pursuant to contractual obligation) commercial mortgage-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2011, for which the Company provides the
following servicing functions (the "Platform"):

* paying agent, certificate administration and trustee; or
* certificate administration and paying agent

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required by Item ll22(d) servicing criteria in regards to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any
transaction, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(iv)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which
management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company
performs with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").
With respect to criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii)and 1122(d)(4)(iii), there were no
activities performed during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 with
respect to the Platform, because there were no occurrences of events that
would require the Company to perform such activities.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company's management
provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable
Servicing Criteria:

* The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance
  with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

* The Company's management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
  Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by
  the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
  Regulation AB.

* Based on such assessment, the Company has complied in all material respects,
  with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to management's assertion of compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.


CITIBANK, N.A.

By: /s/Karen Montbach
Its: Managing Director

Dated: February 28, 2013
# C_2007042EN.01001402.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/14

---

Action brought on 20 December 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-517/06)

(2007/C 42/24)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Braun and E. Montaguti)

Applicant:

Defendants: Republic of Austria

Defendants:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt, in the Steiermark and Salzburg Länder, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt, in the Steiermark and Salzburg Länder, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive expired on 1 July 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 345, p. 90.

1

---
§ 115.12 Contracting with non-DHS entities for the confinement of detainees. ( a ) When contracting for the confinement of detainees in immigration detention facilities operated by non-DHS private or public agencies or other entities, including other government agencies, the agency shall include in any new contracts, contract renewals, or substantive contract modifications the entity's obligation to adopt and comply with these standards.
( b ) Any new contracts, contract renewals, or substantive contract modifications shall provide for agency contract monitoring to ensure that the contractor is complying with these standards.
# C_2006281EN.01003101.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/31

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 September 2006 — L & D v OHIM — Sämann (Aire Limpio)

(Case T-168/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Earlier figurative marks representing a fir tree including, in certain cases, verbal elements - Application for figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Aire Limpio’ - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 281/52)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: L & D, SA (Huercal de Almeria, Spain) (represented by: initially, M. Knospe, and, subsequently, S. Miralles Miravet and A. Castedo Garcia, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Julius Sämann Ltd (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Castán Pérez Gómez and E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM

intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 March 2004 (Case R 326/2003-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Julius Sämann Ltd and L & D, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 6.11.2004.

1

---
Order entered April 17 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01596 - CV IN THE E STATE OF MARIE MERKE L, DECEASED On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 05 - 00375 - 3 

### O RDER B efore Justices Lang

- Miers, Brown and Stoddart Before the Court is appellant Rupert Pollard’s Motion to Disqualify Counsel. The Court requests that appellee file a response to the motion within ten (10) days of the date of this order. The deadline for filing appellee’s brief on the merits in this appeal is suspended pending further order of the Court.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 633 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 311
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 633

                          [Report No. 106-984]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2000

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on or before the 
legislative day of Friday, October 20, 2000, for the Speaker to 
entertain motions to suspend the rules, provided that the object of any 
such motion is announced from the floor at least 90 minutes before the 
motion is offered. In scheduling the consideration of legislation under 
this authority, the Speaker or his designee shall consult with the 
Minority Leader or his designee.
    Sec. 2. House Resolution 615 is laid on the table.
                                                 House Calendar No. 311

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 633

                          [Report No. 106-984]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 17, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```