alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 557 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 261
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 557

                          [Report No. 106-760]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1102) to provide for 
                pension reform, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2000

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1102) to provide for 
                pension reform, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 1102) to provide for pension reform, and for other 
purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. In lieu 
of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute consisting of the text of the amendment recommended by the 
Committee on Ways and Means now printed in H.R. 4843 shall be 
considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto 
to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
Means; (2) the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 
Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Rangel 
or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any 
point of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 261

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 557

                          [Report No. 106-760]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1102) to provide for 
                pension reform, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 18, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 – 906 Certification





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Genmed Holding Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





Date: August 9, 2011
/s/ Erwin R. BouwensErwin R. Bouwens

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Genmed Holding Corp., and will be retained by Genmed Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Insolvency, Receivership, and Liquidation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 15, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291

*1. Robert Karl Kamp, Manhattan, Montana,*                     to acquire control of Inter-Mountain Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire control of First Security Bank, both in Bozeman, Montana.                

B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

*1. The Eyak Corporation, Anchorage, Alaska,*                     to acquire control of Native American Bancorporation Co., and thereby indirectly gain control of Native American Bank, National Association, both in Denver, Colorado.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 22, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-4287 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-11171

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Randy Hordge, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:21-CR-29-1

______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Randy Hordge

has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 

738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hordge

has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 30, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-11171 Document: 40-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2024
No. 23-11171

2

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-11171 Document: 40-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2024
Exhibit 34.3



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Perpetual Trustee Company Limited:

We have examined Managements Assessment, included in the accompanying Management Assessment, that Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (the Company)
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 122(d)(3)(iii) and 1122(d)(3)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for asset-backed securities transactions that are backed by auto
finance receivables for which the Company serviced as issuer trustee (the Platform), as of and for the year ended March 31, 2017. The Companys Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to
the Company because the Company does not perform activities with respect to the Platform relating to those criteria. Appendix B to the Management Assessment identifies the individual trusts defined by management as constituting the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Managements Assessment about the Companys compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the year covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, Managements Assessment that Perpetual Trustee Company Limited complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year
ended March 31, 2017 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG

KPMG

Sydney, Australia

June 23, 2017
- Home
- Regulations and Compliance

# PHMSA Guidance

Although some of the materials that can be accessed from this page may fall outside the definitions of “guidance” set forth in 49 CFR 5.25(c), PHMSA has determined that they include potentially useful information for stakeholders and is including them in this database in an effort to make these materials easier for members of the public to find. You may also find useful information that is potentially not accessed from the page in the links below:
                      - PHMSA FAQs
                      - PHMSA Advisory Bulletins
                      - Pipeline Enforcement Guidance
                      - Pipeline Glossary
                      - Pipeline Guidance Manuals
                      - Pipeline Operator Resources
                      - Pipeline Technical Resources
                      - Hazardous Materials Publications
                      - Hazardous Materials Safety Field Operations and Enforcement Guidance
                      - Hazardous Materials Emergency Waivers

Members of the public may submit comments on draft guidance documents noticed in the Federal Register through Regulations.gov. Comments on any guidance document; requests for issuance, reconsideration, modification, or rescission of any guidance document; or concerns about PHMSA’s compliance with the OMB Good Guidance Bulletin regarding existing guidance documents may be submitted to PHMSA_Guidance@dot.gov. Please identify the guidance document in your request.

**Search Instructions**
                      - To search for PHMSA Guidance Documents (not including Interpretations), use the Keywords or Issued Date fields on the left side of the search box below. Your search results will display in the table below.
                      - To search for PHMSA Regulations Interpretations, use the Interpretations Keyword Search on the right side of the search box, or click the “PHMSA Interpretations Advanced Search” link. Results using the Interpretations Keyword Search will open in a new browser window.

PHMSA Interpretations Advanced Search

# Pagination

-  «« First 
-  ‹‹‹ 
- …
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
-  10 
-  11 
-  12 
-  13 
- …
-  ››› 
-  »Last »
H. Res. 418

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 8, 2000.

Resolved, That the House has learned with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Carl B. Albert, former

Member of the House for 15 terms, and Speaker of the

House of Representatives for the Ninety-second, Ninety-third,

and Ninety-fourth Congresses.

Resolved, That in the death of the Honorable Carl B. Albert the United States and the State of Oklahoma have lost

a valued and eminent public servant and citizen.

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of

the deceased.

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased.

Attest:

Clerk.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40422

Conference Calendar

__________________

ROLAND R. HUNT,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DR. A. LARSON, B. CHANEY, 

D. JEFFCOAT, and C. KYLE

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 94-CV-444

- - - - - - - - - -

August 23, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Deliberate indifference to a prisoner's serious medical need

violates the Eighth Amendment. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97,

106 (1976). A prison official does not violate the Eighth

Amendment "unless [he] knows of and disregards an excessive risk

to an inmate's health or safety; the official must both be aware

of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a

substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw
No. 95-40422

-2-

the inference." Farmer v. Brennan, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1979 (1994). 

Negligence, neglect, and even medical malpractice are not

actionable under § 1983. Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321

(5th Cir. 1991). When an inmate's medical record does not

reflect any medical need for work restrictions, actions of prison

officials in requiring an inmate to work despite his complaints

could amount to nothing more than negligence, which is not

actionable under § 1983. Reeves v. Collins, 27 F.3d 174, 177

(5th Cir. 1994). 

Because his work assignment was consistent with his medical

classification, Warden Chaney, Officers Jeffcoat and Kyle, and

Captain Wyatt were not deliberately indifferent to Hunt's medical

needs by relying on his medical records and classification to

assign him to a work detail. See Reeves, 27 F.3d at 177. Hunt

failed to show that Dr. Larson's actions amounted to deliberate

indifference to his medical needs because he complains only that

Dr. Larson made a mistake in assigning him a medical

classification "1AP." 

Hunt presents nothing more than negligence or malpractice,

thus his claims have no arguable basis in law and were properly

dismissed. 

AFFIRMED.
§ 700.457 Assistance to match or pay 30% of grants, contracts or other expenditures. ( a ) The purpose of applications for financial assistance under this section shall be to aid individuals subject to relocation under the Act and to assist the host communities, towns, cities, or other entities in adjusting to and meeting the needs of the relocatees. For this purpose, the discretionary fund may be used to match or pay not to exceed 30% (thirty percent) of any grant, contract, or other expenditure of the Federal Government, State or local government, tribal government or chapter, or private organization for the benefit of the Navajo or Hopi Tribe, if the Commission determines that such grant, contract, or expenditure would significantly assist the Commission in carrying out its responsibility or assist either tribe in meeting the burdens imposed by this Act.
( b ) An “other expenditure” under this subsection is defined as cooperative agreements, direct provision of services, or in-kind contributions. The Commission may match or pay not to exceed 30% (thirty percent) of another expenditure through a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement.
( c ) Eligible applicants under this section for a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement are defined as States, local government, the Navajo and Hopi Tribes, tribal chapters or villages and profit and nonprofit organizations.
( d ) Total Federal financial assistance under this section may reach 100% (one hundred percent) if the applicant receives 70% (seventy percent) Federal funding from Federal agencies other than the Commission.
( e ) When another Federal agency is a primary source of financial assistance for an applicant, the Commission may, pursuant to an interagency agreement, transfer funds to the primary Federal agency providing financial assistance to the applicant.
( f ) The Commission may, pursuant to an interagency agreement, transfer not to exceed 10% (ten percent) of the funds available under this subpart to another Federal agency directly assisting relocatees if such agency's activities would accomplish the purpose of paragraph (a) of this section. Financial assistance transferred to accomplish an eligible activity under paragraph (a) of this section may not exceed the funding limitation of paragraph (a) of this section.
( g ) An applicant may apply for financial assistance under this section in accordance with the funding limitations described in paragraph (a) for the purpose of undertaking a technical feasibility study of a construction project or any major project with a total funding of over $200,000 (two hundred thousand dollars) or any dollar amount which the Commission may prescribe at some future time.
# C_2014014EN.01001101.xml

| 18.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/11

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 14/10

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Dijon–Toulouse (Blagnac) |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 June 2014 |
| Address from which the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Decree of 3 December 2013 imposing public service obligations on scheduled air services between Dijon and Toulouse
  NOR: DEVA1329598A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information please contact:





  Direction générale de l’aviation civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris Cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Dijon–Toulouse (Blagnac)

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 June 2014

Address from which the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Decree of 3 December 2013 imposing public service obligations on scheduled air services between Dijon and Toulouse

NOR: DEVA1329598A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information please contact:

Direction générale de l’aviation civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris Cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, the undersigned, James A. Cady, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc., and Michael E. McConnell, Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc., do each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc.



|Date: |  | August 12, 2003 |  |  |  | By:                                                                               |  | /S/    JAMES A. CADY       
|----- |  | --------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|      |  |                 |  |  |  | James A. Cady, President, Chief Executive Officer                                
|      |  |                 |  |  |  |                                                                                   |  | and Chairman of the Board  
|      |  |                 |  | 
|Date: |  | August 12, 2003 |  |  |  | By:                                                                               |  | /S/    MICHAEL E.
MCCONNELL
|      |  |                 |  |  |  | Michael E. McConnell Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer