alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2286. Approval of financing plans by Secretary of the Treasury

#### (a) Method, source, timing, terms, and conditions of sale of obligations issued or sold by Federal agencies

To insure the orderly and coordinated marketing of Treasury and Federal agency obligations and appropriate financing planning with respect thereto, and to facilitate the effective financing of programs authorized by law subject to the applicable provisions of such law, the prior approval of the Secretary of the Treasury shall be required with respect to—

(1) the method of financing,

(2) the source of financing,

(3) the timing of financing in relation to market conditions and financing by other Federal agencies, and

(4) the financing terms and conditions, including rates of interest and maturities,

of obligations issued or sold by any Federal agency; except that the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury shall not be required with respect to (A) obligations issued or sold pursuant to an Act of Congress which expressly prohibits any guarantee of such obligations by the United States, and (B) obligations issued or sold by the Farmers Home Administration.

#### (b) Grant or denial of approval by Secretary

Upon receipt of a request from a Federal agency for his approval under subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary of the Treasury shall act promptly either to grant his approval or to advise the agency of the reasons for withholding his approval. In no case shall the Secretary of the Treasury withhold such approval for a period longer than sixty days unless, prior to the end of such period, he submits to the Congress a detailed explanation of his reasons for so doing. In no case shall the Secretary withhold such approval for a period longer than one hundred and twenty days. To the maximum extent practicable, withholdings of approval shall be made in a manner which is not disproportionately detrimental to the functioning of any particular type of Federal program. Expedited treatment shall be accorded in any case in which the Federal agency advises the Secretary of the Treasury that unusual circumstances require such treatment.

#### (c) Time and form for submission of financing plans

Federal agencies subject to this section shall submit financing plans to the Secretary of the Treasury at such times and in such forms as he shall prescribe.

(Pub. L. 93–224, §7, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 938.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on expiration of 30 days after Dec. 29, 1973, see section 20 of Pub. L. 93–224, set out as a note under section 2281 of this title.
| (logo)  WELLS                                                          | Commercial Mortgage Servicing |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| **           **FARGO | D1086-120, 12th Floor         |
|                                                                        | 550 South Tryon Street        |
|                                                                        | Charlotte, NC 28202           |
|                                                                        | 1-800-326-1334                |

 

 

 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2012, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Certificate Administrator, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass -Through Certificates Series 2012-GC J7 ( the "Agreement" ). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.                                            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period” ), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.                                            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
#### § 518.2 Who will administer the self-regulation program for the Commission?

The self-regulation program will be administered by the Office of Self-Regulation. The Chair shall appoint a Director to administer the Office of Self-Regulation.

[87 FR 62986, Oct. 18, 2022]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 3, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Mercedes Meeting with EPA Regarding Proposal for 2017-2025 Light-Duty (LD) 

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards

FROM: Ed Nam, US EPA

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memo documents a meeting held on June 29, 2012 between representatives of Mercedes 

and EPA to discuss Mercedes’ comments on the LD GHG proposed rule. Mercedes distributed 

Powerpoint slides that contained confidential business information. Mercedes generally

discussed the potential to add flexibilities in the rule consistent with their publicly submitted 

comments. The meeting attendees included the following:

Mercedes: Peter Oblander, Walter Puetz, Bill Craven, Pat Rahrer

EPA: Chet France, Edward Nam
§ 502.16 Net revenues. *Net revenues* means gross gaming revenues of an Indian gaming operation less— ( a ) Amounts paid out as, or paid for, prizes; and
( b ) Total gaming-related operating expenses, including all those expenses of the gaming operation commonly known as operating expenses and non-operating expenses consistent with professional accounting pronouncements, excluding management fees.
[74 FR 36932, July 27, 2009]
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

88-6 

April 1, 1988 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4235 - Transfers Pursuant to Change in Bargaining Representative 

4235(a) - Applicability 

4235(b) - Notice Requirements; Appeal 

OPINION: 

We write in response to your request that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") advise you as to what

benefit liabilities are to be transferred under section 4235 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

("ERISA") upon a change in the collective bargaining representative of a group of employees. Specifically, you ask

whether the transfer should include the benefits of "participants who are active-vested, pensioners and inactive-vested"

or only the "active-vested" participants. 

Section 4235(a) provides that where an employer withdraws from a multiemployer pension plan (the "old plan")

because of a certified change of collective bargaining representative, --

if participants of the old plan who are employed by the employer will, as a result of that change, participate in

another multiemployer plan (. . . the "new plan"), the old plan shall transfer assets and liabilities to the new plan in

accordance with [section 4235]. 

Section 4235(b)(2) provides that --

[t]he plan sponsor of the old plan shall . . . notify the employer of . . [*2] . the old plan's intent to transfer to the

new plan the nonforfeitable benefits of the employees who are no longer working in covered service under the old plan

as a result of the change of bargaining representative. . . . 

Both of these provisions refer only to active employees. Section 4235 contains no other provisions describing the

participants for whom benefits are to be transferred. Accordingly, it is the opinion of the PBGC that section 4235

contemplates the transfer of benefit liabilities only for participants who are active employees. 

This interpretation is supported by a policy consideration as well. Because inactive and retired participants do not

in general have a voice in a change of collective bargaining representative, it is inappropriate to include them in a transfer

that does not afford them the protections of section 4231 of ERISA, which, among other things, requires that affected

participants' accrued benefits not be reduced as a result of a transfer. Section 4231 applies to a transfer that would

otherwise fall within the purview of section 4235 only if the plan sponsors of the old and new plans so agree under

section 4235(f)(1). 

If you have any further questions [*3] about this matter, you may call Deborah C. Murphy of my office at 202-778-

8820. 

Gary M. Ford 

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11210-11211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday March 11, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

[[Page 11211]]


MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-4704 Filed 2-25-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-78 

December 3, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4007 Payment of Premiums 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of November 3, 1975 * * * concerning the declaration and payment of premiums.

You indicated that a plan sponsor's fiscal year ends on October 31, that the plan sponsor's Board of Directors adopted

the plan on October 31 with an effective date of October 31 and that the plan sponsor made a contribution to the plan's

trust fund on October 31. You asked whether a partial year's premium payment and annual report are due for this plan

year. In my opinion, the plan's plan year both began and ended on October 31, 1975 and, consequently, a partial year's

premium payment and submission of the annual report (which can be on the premium payment form) are required to be

filed with this Corporation. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 558.5 Submission of notices. ( a ) All notices under this part shall be provided to the Commission through the appropriate Regional office.
( b ) Should a tribe wish to submit notices electronically, it should contact the appropriate Regional office for guidance on acceptable document formats and means of transmission.
### **CHAPTER 42—LOW-INCOME HOUSING PRESERVATION AND RESIDENT HOMEOWNERSHIP**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—PREPAYMENT OF MORTGAGES INSURED UNDER NATIONAL HOUSING ACT

Sec.
4101.
General prepayment limitation.
4102.
Notice of intent.
4103.
Appraisal and preservation value of eligible low-income housing.
4104.
Annual authorized return and preservation rents.
4105.
Federal cost limits and limitations on plans of action.
4106.
Information from Secretary.
4107.
Plan of action.
4108.
Prepayment and voluntary termination.
4109.
Incentives to extend low-income use.
4110.
Incentives for transfer to qualified purchasers.
4111.
Mandatory sale for housing exceeding Federal cost limits.
4112.
Criteria for approval of plan of action involving incentives.
4113.
Assistance for displaced tenants.
4114.
Permissible prepayment or voluntary termination and modification of commitments.
4115.
Timetable for approval of plan of action.
4116.
Resident homeownership program.
4117.
Delegated responsibility to State agencies.
4118.
Consultations with other interested parties.
4119.
Definitions.
4120.
Notice to tenants.
4121.
Definitions of qualified and priority purchaser and related party rule.
4122.
Preemption of State and local laws.
4123.
Severability.
4124.
Authorization of appropriations.
4125.
State preservation project assistance.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND CAPACITY BUILDING

4141.
Authority.
4142.
Purposes.
4143.
Grants for building resident capacity and funding predevelopment costs.
4144.
Grants for other purposes.
4145.
Delivery of assistance through intermediaries.
4146.
Definitions.
4147.
Funding.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subtitles A and B of the Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990, Pub. L. 100–242, title II, as revised generally by Pub. L. 101–625, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4249, comprise subchapter I of this chapter. Prior to the general revision by Pub. L. 101–625 subtitles A and B (§§201–235) of the Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act of 1987, Pub. L. 100–242, title II, Feb. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1877, as amended by Pub. L. 100–628, title X, §§1021–1027, Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3270, 3271; Pub. L. 101–235, title II, §§201, 202(a)–(c), 203(b), Dec. 15, 1989, 103 Stat. 2037, 2038; Pub. L. 101–402, §1, Oct. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 866; Pub. L. 101–494, §§1(c), 2(a), Oct. 31, 1990, 104 Stat. 1185, were set out as a note under section 1715l of this title and amended section 1715z–6 of this title.

Subtitle C of the Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990, Pub. L. 100–242, title II, as added by Pub. L. 102–550, title III, §312, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3765, comprises subchapter II of this chapter. Another subtitle C of title II of Pub. L. 100–242 amended sections 1472, 1485, and 1487 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 7 , 2020

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00468

- CV

ANCHOR DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC , Appellant

V.

LUIS GARCIA DE LOS SALMONES AND MARIA GARCIA DE LOS SALMONES , Appellee s

On Appeal from the Co unty C ivil C our t at Law No

. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1124642

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed May 10, 2019 . No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed

t h e court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On, April 7, 2 020 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s
intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2

appellant paid or made a rrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
Appellant has not provided this court with pro of of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consi s ts of Justices Ch ristop her, Wise and Zimmerer

.
-  Home 
-  Pipeline Field Operations 
-  Effort Allocation 

# In This Section

                      -  Field Operations Overview 
                      -  Effort Allocation                          -  Overview 
                        -  Federal Effort 
                        -  State Effort 
                      -  Drug and Alcohol                          -  Overview 
                        -  Drug and Alcohol Inspection Forms 
                        -  Drug and Alcohol Regulations 
                        -  Guidance 
                        -  Management Information System (MIS) 
                      -  Investigations 

# State Effort

While PHMSA is responsible for developing and publishing pipeline safety regulations, the pipeline safety statutes provide for States to assume intrastate regulatory, inspection, and enforcement responsibilities under an annual certification. If a State has a pipeline safety program certified by PHMSA, a State Agency is responsible for complaince inspections and failure investigations on intrastate pipeline systems, including most gas distribution pipeline systems. As a result, the majority of pipeline mileage is regulated by State Agencies.

PHMSA issues state certifications for pipeline safety oversight separately for gas pipelines/liquefied natural gas facilities, hazardous liquid pipelines, and underground natural gas storage facilities with different levels of certification possible. See Federal and State Authorities for more information.

Click here for an explanation of various Regulated Entities and Facilities subject to pipeline safety regulations.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward L. Pierce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BindView Development
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2003


/s/ EDWARD L. PIERCE
-------------------------------------
Edward L. Pierce
Director, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.242 What is the effective date of retrocession? The retrocession is effective on the date which is the earliest date among: ( a ) One year from the date of the Indian tribe or tribal organization's request;
( b ) The date the contract expires; or
( c ) A mutually agreed-upon date.
#### Colin J. Woodworth, Sr., et al., Individually and as Guardians Pursuant to Article 81 of the New York Mental Hygiene Law of Colin J. Woodworth, Jr., Appellants, v Andrew Hink et al., Defendants, and Greenwood Central School District et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 545]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Joseph W Latham, A.J.), entered August 10, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order granted the motion of defendants Steuben-Allegany Board of Cooperative Education Services and Greenwood Central School District for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Colin J. Woodworth, Jr. (Colin) in a head-on collision between his vehicle and one driven by another student. At the time of the accident, Colin was driving from his classes at defendant Steuben-Allegany *1193Board of Cooperative Education Services (BOCES) back to his high school. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of BOCES and defendant Greenwood Central School District for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against them. Under the circumstances, those defendants owed no duty to Colin and his parents to prevent Colin from leaving the BOCES facility in his father’s car instead of on a school bus, notwithstanding the existence of school rules requiring students to ride the bus in the absence of a parent’s written permission to drive in a private vehicle *(see Thompson v Ange,*83 AD2d 193, 194-196 [1981]; *see also Briggs v Rhinebeck Cent. School Dist.,*2 AD3d 383 [2003], *lv denied*2 NY3d 706 [2004]; *Cerni v Zambrana,*271 AD2d 566 [2000]; *Wenger v Goodell,*220 AD2d 937, 937-938 [1995]; *Bushnell v Berne-Knox-Westerlo School Dist.,*125 AD2d 859 [1986], *lv denied*69 NY2d 609 [1987]; *Hurlburt v Noxon,*149 Misc 2d 374, 376 [1990]). Moreover, the record does not support plaintiffs’ contention that those defendants assumed a special duty to Colin and his parents *(see Wenger v Goodell,*288 AD2d 815, 816-817 [2001], *lv denied*98 NY2d 605 [2002]; *Brabender v Altmann,*2001 NY Slip Op 40148[U], *3-5; *see also Chalen v Glen Cove School Dist.,*29 AD3d 508, 510 [2006]).

All concur, Pigott, Jr., PJ., not participating. Present—Pigott, Jr., EJ., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.