alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 63.35 How may Indian child protection and family violence prevention program funds be used? Indian child protection and family violence prevention program funds may be used to: ( a ) Establish child protective services programs.
( b ) Establish family violence prevention and treatment programs.
( c ) Develop and implement multidisciplinary child abuse investigation and prosecution programs.
( d ) Provide immediate shelter and related assistance to victims of family violence and their dependents, including construction or renovation of facilities to establish family violence shelters.
( e ) Purchase equipment to assist in the investigation of cases of child abuse and child neglect.
( f ) Develop protocols and intergovernmental or interagency agreements among tribal, Federal, state law enforcement, courts of competent jurisdiction, and related agencies to ensure investigations of child abuse cases to minimize the trauma to the child victim, to define and specify each party's responsibilities, and to provide for the coordination of services to victims and their families.
( g ) Develop child protection codes and regulations that provide for the care and protection of children and families on Indian reservations.
( h ) Establish community education programs for tribal members and school children on issues of family violence, child abuse, and child neglect.
( i ) Establish training programs for child protective services, law enforcement, judicial, medical, education, and related services personnel in the investigation, prevention, protection, and treatment of child abuse, child neglect, and family violence.
( j ) Establish other innovative and culturally relevant programs and projects that show promise of successfully preventing and treating family violence, child abuse, and child neglect.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0213 IN THE MATTER OF: L.S., A YOUTH UNDER THE AGE OF 18. **G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until August 28 , 2023 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court July 19 2023

07/19/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0213
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 667

Requesting the President to furnish to the House of Representatives certain

information held by the Archivist of the United States concerning the

transmission of electoral information under section 6 of title 3, United

States Code, by the States and the District of Columbia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 14, 2000

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Requesting the President to furnish to the House of Representatives certain information held by the Archivist

of the United States concerning the transmission of electoral information under section 6 of title 3, United

States Code, by the States and the District of Columbia.

1 Resolved, That the President is requested to provide

2 to the House of Representatives, not later than 15 days

3 after the adoption of this resolution, the following infor4 mation relating to the presidential election held on Novem5 ber 7, 2000:

6 (1) Any record of the name and title of the pri7 mary individual in each State and the District of Co-
2

•HRES 667 IH

1 lumbia with whom the Archivist of the United States

2 has communicated to coordinate the transmission of

3 the certificates required by section 6 of title 3,

4 United States Code, from that State or District.

5 (2) A statement whether the Archivist of the

6 United States has received from each State and the

7 District of Columbia a certificate of ascertainment

8 or a certificate of the determination of an electoral

9 controversy under section 6 of title 3, United States

10 Code.

11 (3) Any record of communication between the

12 Archivist of the United States and a State or the

13 District of Columbia (or any individual identified in

14 paragraph (1)) concerning transmission of any cer15 tificate required by section 6 of title 3, United

16 States Code, by such State or District, including any

17 communication relating to the legal sufficiency of

18 any such certificate.

Æ
### §748. Reduction of securities to money

As soon as practicable after the date of the order for relief, the trustee shall reduce to money, consistent with good market practice, all securities held as property of the estate, except for customer name securities delivered or reclaimed under section 751 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2614.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

Section 748 requires the trustee to liquidate all securities, except for customer name securities, of the estate in a manner consistent with good market practice. The trustee should refrain from flooding a thin market with a large percentage of shares in any one issue. If the trustee holds restricted securities or securities in which trading has been suspended, then the trustee must arrange to liquidate such securities in accordance with the securities laws. A private placement may be the only exemption available with the customer of the debtor the best prospect for such a placement. The subsection does not permit such a customer to bid in his net equity as part of the purchase price; a contrary result would permit a customer to receive a greater percentage on his net equity claim than other customers.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRapid Generation of Large Dimension Photon Sieve DesignsA photon sieve is a revolutionary optical instrument that provides high resolution imaging at a fraction of the weight of typical telescopes (areal density of 0.3 kg/m2 compared to 25 kg/m2 for the James Webb Space Telescope). The photon sieve is a variation of a Fresnel Zone Plate consisting of many small holes spread out in a ring-like pattern, which focuses light of a specific wavelength by diffraction. The team at NASA Langley Research Center has produced a variety of small photon sieves for testing. However, it is necessary to increase both the scale and rate of production, as a single sieve previously took multiple weeks to design and fabricate. This report details the different methods used in producing photon sieve designs in two file formats: CIF and DXF. The difference between these methods, and the two file formats were compared, to determine the most efficient design process. Finally, a step-by-step sieve design and fabrication process was described. The design files can be generated in both formats using an editing tool such as Microsoft Excel. However, an approach using a MATLAB program reduced the computing time of the designs and increased the ability of the user to generate large photon sieve designs. Although the CIF generation process was deemed the most efficient, the design techniques for both file types have been proven to generate complete photon sieves that can be used for scientific applicationsDocument ID20170011482Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHariharan, Shravan*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Fitzpatrick, Sean*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Kim, Hyun Jung*(National Inst. of Aerospace Hampton, VA, United States)*Julian, Matthew*(Virginia Univ. Charlottesville, VA, United States)*Sun, Wenbo*(Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)*Tedjojuwono, Ken*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*MacDonnell, David*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 1, 2017Publication DateSeptember 1, 2017Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-27929L-20860NASA/TM-2017-219664Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 432938.09.01.07.05.05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170011482.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §2111. Personnel: administrators and instructors

The Secretary of the military department concerned may detail regular or reserve members of an armed force under his jurisdiction (including retired members and members of the Fleet Reserve and Fleet Marine Corps Reserve recalled to active duty with their consent) for instructional and administrative duties at educational institutions where units of the program are maintained. The Secretary of the Air Force may detail members of the Space Force in the same manner as regular and reserve members of the Air Force.

(Added Pub. L. 88–647, title II, §201(1), Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1069; amended Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1722(l)(3), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 674.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Pub. L. 118–31 inserted at end "The Secretary of the Air Force may detail members of the Space Force in the same manner as regular and reserve members of the Air Force."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Demonstration Project for Instruction and Support of Army ROTC Units by Army Reserve and National Guard

Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title V, §554, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2527, directed the Secretary of the Army to carry out a demonstration project in order to assess the feasibility and advisability of providing instruction and similar support to units of the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps of the Army through members of the Army Reserve, including members of the Individual Ready Reserve, and members of the Army National Guard, at at least one institution of higher education, and to submit to Congress a report assessing the activities under the project not later than Feb. 1 in each of 1998 and 1999, and provided that the Secretary's authority to carry out the project would expire three years after Sept. 23, 1996.
§ 63.19 When should an employer deny employment or dismiss an employee? ( a ) An employer must deny employment or dismiss an employee when an individual has been found guilty of or entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to any felonious offense, or any of two or more misdemeanor offenses under Federal, State, or Tribal law involving crimes of violence; sexual assault, sexual molestation, sexual exploitation, sexual contact or prostitution; crimes against persons; or offenses committed against children, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) An employer may deny employment or dismiss an employee when an individual has been convicted of an offense involving a child victim, a sex crime, or a drug felony.
( c ) An employer may consider if a pardon, expungement, set aside, or other court order reaches the plea of guilty, plea of nolo contendere, or the finding of guilt.
[61 FR 32274, June 21, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 66771, Nov. 30, 1999; 85 FR 37564, June 23, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 535 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 29, 2000.
Whereas Congress is responsible for oversight and spending under the Medicare 
        Program;
Whereas the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 was passed in response to major economic 
        concerns about inflation in costs in the Medicare Program;
Whereas the savings resulting from enactment of that Act exceeded the estimates 
        at the time of enactment and has resulted in payment rates for classes 
        of providers below the rates previously anticipated;
Whereas the Congress adjusted some elements of the Medicare Program in the 
        Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999;
Whereas a significant number of Medicare+Choice organizations is withdrawing, or 
        considering withdrawing, from the Medicare+Choice Program because of 
        inadequate reimbursement rates;
Whereas the Medicare prescription drug bill pending in the Congress will delay 
        the date by which Medicare+Choice organizations must decide whether to 
        remain in the Medicare+Choice Program from July 1, 2000, to October 1, 
        2000; and
Whereas, because of improved economic performance, it is anticipated that the 
        Congressional Budget Office in its mid-year reestimates will project 
        dramatically increased non-Social Security surpluses above those assumed 
        in the adoption of the most recent Congressional Budget Resolution for 
        fiscal year 2001: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that, upon 
receipt of such mid-year Congressional Budget Office re-estimates, the House of 
Representatives shall promptly assess the budgetary implications of such 
reestimates and provide for appropriate adjustments to the Medicare Program 
during this legislative session.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# **Exhibit 32.2**

**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GB&TBancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Gregory L. Hamby                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                      |
|                                      |
| November 9, 2006                          |

 

1

----
§ 43.4 Annual notification of rights. ( a ) Each educational institution to which this part applies and which maintains records on students shall inform parents or eligible students of the rights given them by this part.
( b ) In meeting the requirement in paragraph (a) of this section the educational institution shall give notice to parents and eligible students at least annually of the following: ( 1 ) The types of education records and information contained in them which are directly related to students and maintained by the institution.
( 2 ) The name and position of the official responsible for maintaining each type of record, the persons who have access to those records, and the purpose for which they have access.
( 3 ) The policies of the institution for reviewing and expunging those records.
( 4 ) The procedures established by the institution under § 43.5.
( 5 ) The procedures for challenging the content of education records including those in § 43.10.
( 6 ) The cost, if any, which will be charged to the parent or eligible student for reproducing copies of records under § 43.5.
( 7 ) The categories of information which the institution has designated as “directory information” under § 43.20.
( c ) The notice given to a parent or eligible student under this section shall be in a language considered by the institution to be understandable by the parent or eligible student.
Converted by EDGARwiz


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, DOC HOLLIDAY CASINO LLC, DBA DOC HOLLIDAY CASINO (Assignor), hereby assigns to DOC HOLLIDAY CASINO II, LLC DBA DOC HOLLIDAY CASINO II whose mailing address is P O Box 639, Central City, CO  80427 (“Assignee”), the entire Interest of Assignor under that certain Sales Order Contract referencing Sales Order No. 216975 (“77012506”) (“Prior Agreement”), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, between Assignor and IGT whose address is 9295 Prototype Dr., Reno, NV  89511 (“IGT”).




WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to confirm the assignment and assumption and further clarify their rights and obligations thereunder;




NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, that:




1.

Assignee hereby agrees to assume all of the obligations and duties of Assignor under the terms and conditions of Sales Order Contract # 77012506 and to sign appropriate documents to perfect IGT’s security interest in the equipment.




2.

IGT hereby acknowledges and consents to the foregoing Assignment and Assumption.




3.

As of March 18, 2008, the outstanding principal balance due and owing IGT under Sales Order Contract # 77012506 is One Hundred Eighteen Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Seven and 72/100 Dollars ($118,877.72) (the “Principal Balance”) and the outstanding interest balance accruing at the rate of eight and one half percent (8.5%) is Nine Thousand One Hundred Ninety Three and 86/100 Dollars ($9,193.86) (the “Interest Balance”).




4.

The Principal Balance and Interest Balance will be combined for a balance of One Hundred Twenty Eight Thousand Seventy One and 58/100 Dollars ($128,071.58) (the “New Principal Balance”) and shall be paid in eighteen (18) consecutive monthly principal and interest installments of Seven Thousand Six Hundred Three and 45/100 Dollars ($7,603.45) commencing April 18, 2008, and continuing on the same day of each month thereafter.  A final consecutive payment of all outstanding principal and interest shall be immediately due and payable September 18, 2009.




5.

Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal balance at a fixed rate of eight and one half percent (8.5%) per annum.  Should this contract go into default, then the terms and conditions under paragraph F of the Prior Agreement will prevail.




6.

Except as shall be inconsistent with the modification set forth herein the terms and conditions of the Prior Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and incorporated herein by reference.




ASSIGNOR

ASSIGNEE

IGT

Doc Holliday Casino LLC

Doc Holliday Casino II, LLC

Doc Holliday Casino

Doc Holliday Casino II




By:  

/s/ Fedele V. Scutti

By: 

Clifford L. Neuman

By:

Fedele V. Scutti

Clifford L. Neuman

Managing Member

President of Global Casinos, Inc.,

Manager

March 18, 2008

March 18, 2008
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10‐K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Fixed Income Trust for Prudential Financial, Inc. Notes, Series 2012-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
 
  
 Date: March 15, 2017/s/ James WhangName:  James WhangTitle:    Treasurer(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-106 

September 3, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(13) Plans Covered. Professional Service Employer Plans

4021(c)(2)(B) Plans Covered. Definition of Professional Individuals 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of June 29, 1976 in which you asked whether your firm's "Defined Benefit Pension

Plan" (the "Plan") is covered under the termination insurance provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security

Act of 1974 (the "Act"). I understand in a subsequent conversation with William Beyer of my staff you asked for an

opinion on the application of § 4021(b)(13) of the Act to the Plan. You specifically asked for a comparison of the

application of § 4021(b)(13) to two qualified plans, the participants of one consisting solely of a physician and his

secretary (the "physician-secretary plan") and the other solely of an independent insurance agent and his secretary (the

"insurance agent-secretary plan" ). 

Section 4021(b)(13) of the Act excludes from coverage any plan: 

Established and maintained by a professional service employer which does not at any time after the date of

enactment of this Act have more than 25 active participants in the plan. 

A professional service employer is any entity owned or controlle by professional [*2] individuals, as defined in

§ 4021(c)(2)(B) of the Act, where both the entity and the professional individuals owning and controlling it are engaged

in the performance of the same professional service. 

Section 4021(c)(2)(B) lists some but not all of those individuals who are considered to be "professional individuals."

Physicians are included in this list and therefore the physician-secretary plan would be excluded from coverage under

the termination insurance provisions of the Act. 

 Insurance agents, however, are not included in the list. Consequently, our determination of whether such

individuals, and others not listed, are "professional individuals" depends on an analysis of the services performed and

the expertise required to perform them. 

In our view, a professional individual generally is one who provides services which require knowledge of an

advanced type in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual

instruction and study, as distinguished from a general academic education and from an apprenticeship or from training

in the performance of routine mental, manual or physical processes. The rendering of professional [*3] services

generally requires the consistent exercise of discretion and judgment in its performance and would be predominantly

intellectual in character. 

Although quidelines for defining professional service employers have not yet been developed by this Corporation,

an insurance agent would not appear to fit within the foregoing description, and the insurance agent-secretary plan would

not appear to be excluded from coverage under the plan termination insurance provisions of the Act. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel