alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Quicksilver Resources Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Philip W. Cook, Senior Vice
President  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Glenn Darden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, each certifies that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 9, 2005



|    |  |                                                 |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                 |  | 
|By: |  | /s/    PHILIP W. COOK                           |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    GLENN DARDEN                  
|    |  | Philip W. Cook                                  |  |  |  |     |  | Glenn Darden                         
|    |  | Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2006224EN.01004001.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/40

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 July 2006 — Rossi v OHIM — Marcorossi (MARCOROSSI)

(Case T-97/05) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark MARCOROSSI - Earlier national and international word marks MISS ROSSI - Earlier Community word mark SERGIO ROSSI - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion)

(2006/C 224/86)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Sergio Rossi SpA (San Mauro Pascoli, Italy) (represented by: A Ruo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Marcorossi Srl (Bodio Lommago, Italy) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, M. Boleto and E. Gavuzzi, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 December 2004 (Case R 226/2003-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Sergio Rossi SpA and Marcorossi Srl

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the intervener and to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the intervener and to bear its own costs;

| 3. | Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 115, 14.5.2005.

1

---
§ 700.147 Eligibility. ( a ) To be eligible for services provided for under the Act, and these regulations, the head of household and/or immediate family must have been residents on December 22, 1974, of an area partitioned to the Tribe of which they were not members.
( b ) The burden of proving residence and head of household status is on the applicant.
( c ) Eligibility for benefits is further restricted by 25 U.S.C. 640d-13(c) and 14(c).
( d ) Individuals are not entitled to receive separate benefits if it is determined that they are members of a household which has received benefits.
( e ) Relocation benefits are restricted to those who qualify as heads-of-household as of July 7, 1986.
[49 FR 22278, May 29, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 19170, May 28, 1986]
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR 2008 0.075 PPM 8-HOUR OZONE

REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY SIP ANALYSIS AND

FEDERAL NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS FOR 17 CONTROL TECHNIQUE SOURCE CATEGORIES

Planning Area: Antelope Valley Desert Air Quality Management District

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V –

Criteria for Determining the Completeness 

of Plan Submissions

Enclosed Notes

2.1 ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's 

Designee 

Letter from Richard W. Corey, ARB 

Executive Officer, to Jared Blumenfeld

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption 

District Resolutions 15-04 and 15-05, 

Antelope Valley RACT SIP,

ARB Executive Order S-15-006

2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation 

District Resolution 15-04 and 15-05, 

Antelope Valley RACT SIP,

ARB Executive Order S-15-006

2.1(d) Copy of Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT) analysis  Antelope Valley RACT SIP

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's 

Procedural Requirements 

District Resolutions 15-04 and 15-05, 

Antelope Valley RACT SIP,

ARB Executive Order S-15-006

2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 

40 CFR part 51.102 

Certificates of Publication –

Public Notices dated April 17, 2015

2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in 

Accordance with Notice 

ARB Executive Order S-15-006,

Antelope Valley RACT SIP and

Negative Declarations

2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and 

Responses  Antelope Valley RACT SIP

2.2 TECHNICAL SUPPORT

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant 

Antelope Valley RACT SIP and 

Negative Declarations

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status 

Antelope Valley RACT SIP and 

Negative Declarations

2.2(c), Estimate of Impact on Emissions, 

2.2(d), Demonstration Plan Protects NAAQS, 

2.2(e) Modeling Support

N/A

2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 

2.2(i) Justification N/A
# C_2006158EN.01001101.xml

| 7.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/11

---

Preparatory Action 2006 victims of terrorists acts

(2006/C 158/06)

The complete call for proposal is published on the JLS website:

http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/funding/victims_terrorism/funding_victims_terrorism_en.htm

Deadline for the presentation of proposals: 5 September 2006

---
§ 310.3 Conditions. No article may carry the Government mark of genuineness for Alaskan Indian hand-made products unless all of the following conditions are met: ( a ) The article is hand-made by an Alaskan Indian.
( b ) The article is hand-made under conditions not resembling a workshop or factory system.
( c ) All raw materials used in carving, basketry and mat making, and all furs and hides used in the manufacture of hand-made artifacts, must be of native origin.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-194-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
# C_2006326EN.01007902.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/79

---

Action brought on 28 November 2006 — UniCredito Italiano v OHIM –Union Investment Privatfonds (UniCredit Wealth Management)

(Case T-337/06)

(2006/C 326/161)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: UniCredito Italiano SpA (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: G. Floridia and R. Floridia, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | annulment of the contested decision |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of the contested decision

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: UniCredito Italiano

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘UniCredit Wealth Management’ (registration application No 2.330.066) for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 36, 41 and 42

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word marks ‘UNIFONDS’ (No 991.995) and ‘UNIRAK’ (No 991.997) and figurative mark ‘UNIZINS’ (No 2.016.954) for services in Class 36 (capital investment)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition allowed in part in so far as there was held to be a likelihood of confusion as regards capital investments

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: to dismiss the action

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Misapplication of the theory of the extended protection of what are known as serial marks as formulated by the Court of First Instance in Case T-194/03 Il Ponte Finanziaria v OHIM [2006] ECR II-0000 (Bainbridge)

Pleas in law:

Il Ponte Finanziaria

OHIM

Bainbridge

---
### §1459. Separability

Notwithstanding any other evidences of the intention of Congress, it is hereby declared to be the controlling intent of Congress that if any provision of this chapter, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 91–351, title III, §310, July 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 457; Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §731(l), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 435.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 amended section catchline and struck out first sentence which read as follows: "Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, or as otherwise provided by the Corporation or by laws hereafter enacted by the Congress expressly in limitation of provisions of this chapter, the powers and functions of the Corporation and of the Board of Directors shall be exercisable, and the provisions of this chapter shall be applicable and effective, without regard to any other law."
### [§2339b. Renumbered §8751]
#### Chandler et al. v. Wise et al.

(Decided Dec. 17, 1937.)

HUBERT MEREDITH, Attorney General,. and J. W. JONES, As- • sistant Attorney General, for appellants.

LAFON ALLEN and OLDHAM CLARKE for appellees.

Opinion

Per Curiam

— Affirming.

This case was before this court on a demurrer to the petition. Wise v. Chandler, 270 Ky. 1, 108 S. W. (2d) 1024. The judgment of the circuit court sustaining the demurrer was reversed for the reasons set out in that opinion. Upon the return of the case to the circuit court the defendants (now appellants) declined to plead further, and judgment was entered in conformity with the opinion of this court. No new issue or additional question is presented on this appeal, and the court has not changed its view on any of the questions formerly presented, including those raised under the Federal Constitution.

Judgment affirmed.

Whole court sitting.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  The McClatchy Company Retirement Plan 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# The McClatchy Company Retirement Plan 

*Last updated on February 1, 2021*

McClatchy retirees and beneficiaries whose first payments from PBGC were made in 2021 were asked to complete and return a Payee Information Form (Form 701). Due to service impacts, the deadline is extended to 90 days from the date of the letter. Visit 2021 Payment Schedule & Form 701 Deadline Extension for more information.

On September 04, 2020, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation took responsibility as trustee for the defined benefit pension plan sponsored by The McClatchy Company. The McClatchy Company Retirement Plan ended as of August 31, 2020. The plan covers more than 24,000 workers and retirees.

PBGC will update the following questions and answers about McClatchy as more information becomes available.

MCCLATCHY PLAN

##           FAQ      

Questions and Answers for Participants in the McClatchy Company Retirement Plan

General FAQs About PBGC

##           CONTACT US      

You can call 1-800-400-7242,

Monday-Friday, 8:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. ET

TTY/ASCII users may call 711.

More contact information for workers and retirees

##           NEWS      

PBGC to Pay Pension Benefits for The McClatchy Company Workers, Retirees
### [§§3502 to 3511. Omitted]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

See Codification note set out under section 3501 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 523 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 14, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 761) to regulate 
interstate commerce by electronic means by permitting and encouraging the 
continued expansion of electronic commerce through the operation of free market 
forces, and other purposes. All points of order against the conference report 
and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### SUBCHAPTER III—TRANSFER OF POWERS TO THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, THE CORPORATION, AND THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Exhibit 10.6

KECI

Kentucky Energy Consultants, Inc.

12508 W. Atlantic Blvd

Coral Springs, FL 33071

Tel 954-575-1471

Fax 954-757-1765



May 1, 2006



Joe Jacobs

Consolidated Energy, Inc.

76 George Rd

Betsy Lane, KY



Dear Mr. Jacobs,



At the request of Consolidated Energy, Inc. Board of Directors, Saudi American Minerals, Inc. has agreed to cancel an agreement dated July 21, 2003 and all revisions to the agreement.



An agreement dated July 21, 2003 between Eastern Consolidated Energy, Inc. and Kentucky Energy Consultants, Inc.  Please be notified by this letter that Kentucky Energy Consultants, Inc. has terminated and declare this Agreement null and void.



Sincerely,



/s/Larry Hunt

Larry Hunt



Agreed and accepted



/s/Joseph Jacobs

Joseph Jacobs, President, Eastern Consolidated Energy, Inc.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SOCIALWISE, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Socialwise, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Collas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Información Para Administrar Su Beneficio 
-  Orden Calificada de Relaciones Domésticas (QDRO, Siglas E... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov’s English home page for more information available in English.

# Orden Calificada de Relaciones Domésticas (QDRO, siglas en inglés)

Cuando una pareja se divorcia o se separa, o un miembro busca manutención para los hijos o de un cónyuge al otro, un tribunal o agencia estatal puede dividir el beneficio de pensión de una persona u ordenar pagos a través de una *Orden de Relaciones Domésticas*(DRO, siglas en inglés). Cuando la Orden de Relaciones Domésticas (DRO) se relaciona con un plan de pensión administrado por PBGC, PBGC deberá revisarlo para asegurarse de que esté en conformidad con ERISA, la ley federal de pensiones, así como con las políticas de PBGC. Si lo es, PBGC califica la orden y se convierte en una *Orden Calificada de Relaciones Domésticas* (QDRO, siglas en inglés). PBGC pagará los beneficios según las instrucciones.

El documento sobre las Órdenes Calificadas de Relaciones Domésticas y PBGC contiene la información que usted o su abogado necesitan para preparar una QDRO e incluye:
                          - QDRO Modelo de Interés Separado de PBGC
                          - QDRO Modelo de Pago Compartido de PBGC   
                          - Modelo de una QDRO para Manutención Infantil y Pago Compartido de PBGC  
                          - QDRO Modelo de Tratamiento como Cónyuge de PBGC  
                          - Instrucciones para las QDROs Modelos de PBGC  
                          - Procedimientos y una lista de Verificación
                          - Información sobre los procedimientos de PBGC durante nuestra revisión de su orden de relaciones domésticas
                          - Lista de control para utilizar al redactar una orden de relaciones domésticas que se enviará a la PBGC
                          - Apéndices sobre:                             - Reglas de Beneficios de la PBGC
                            - Qué sucede si un orden de relaciones domésticas es calificada antes de que PBGC se convierta en fideicomisario de un plan
                            - Normas sobre Impuestos de la QDRO
                            - Lenguaje para incluir los beneficios de jubilación anticipada subsidiados en una QDRO de interés separado
                            - Cómo obtener cierta información de los participantes de PBGC 

Febrero 11, 2022

Déjenos sus comentarios
#### § 61.13 Decision of the Assistant Secretary on appeals.

The decision of the Assistant Secretary on an appeal shall be final and conclusive and written notice of the decision shall be given the individual, parent or guardian having legal custody of a minor, or sponsor, as applicable. The name of any person whose appeal has been sustained will be added to the roll. Unless otherwise specified by law or in a tribal governing document, the determination of the Assistant Secretary shall only affect the individual's eligibility to share in the distribution of the judgment funds.
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

**2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of April1, 2012 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Midland Loan Services, aDivision of PNC Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor, Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust2012-C6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C6  **(WFRBS2012-C6)**

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.            All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.            A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has beenconducted under my supervision.

 

3.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ AdamSinger                                 Date: March 1, 2017

                    Adam Singer, Managing Director
----

Action brought on 4 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-298/06)

(2006/C 237/08)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Tserepa-Lacombe and I Khatzigiannis)

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of the directive into domestic law expired on 1 July 2004.

----

(1)OJ L 143, 11.6.2003, p. 23.

----