alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-34 

1981 PBGC LEXIS 8 

October 18, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4231 Mergers & Transfers Between Multiemployer Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter asking whether a multiemployer Pension Fund and a multiemployer Welfare Fund

may be merged pursuant to Section 4231 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), as amended by

the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, ("MPPAA") Pub. L. 96-364, 94 Stat. 1208 (September 26,

1980), 29 U.S.C. § 1411, to form a combined entity for purposes of plan administration at present and ultimately merge

the assets of the plans. 

Section 4231 establishes certain requirements for a merger or transfer of assets between multiemployer pension

funds. It does not apply to a merger of a pension fund and a welfare fund, cf.- PBGC Regulation § 2670.2

"Multiemployer Plan", 46 Fed. Reg. 27332 (May 19, 1981). 

I understand you have already contacted the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor concerning the

possible implications of a merger of a pension fund with a welfare fund and that both agencies discussed possible

problems with you informally. 

Please contact * * * of my staff at (202) 254-4873 or the above address if you have any questions. 

I hope we have been of assistance. [*2] 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)














Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Accelerated Acquisitions XIX, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The amendment no. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date:  January 21, 2015




/s Timothy Neher


Paul Falco Principal Executive Officer


and Principal Accounting Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIX, INC. and will be retained byACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIX, INC.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 603 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 293
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 603

                          [Report No. 106-924]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 4578) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2000

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 4578) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2001, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4578) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 293

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 603

                          [Report No. 106-924]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 4578) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 2, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
### §8242. Rations

(a) The President may prescribe the components and quantities of the Navy ration. The President may direct the issuance of equivalent articles in place of the prescribed components of the ration if the President determines that economy and the health and comfort of the members of the naval service require such action.

(b) An enlisted member of the naval service on active duty is entitled to one ration daily. If an emergency ration is issued, it is in addition to the regular ration.

(c) Fresh or preserved fruits, milk, butter, and eggs necessary for the proper diet of the sick and injured in hospitals shall be provided under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Navy.

(d) The Secretary of the Navy may increase the quantity of daily rations for members of the naval service on a vessel or at a station that has an authorized complement of less than 150 members if the President determines that the vessel or station is operating under conditions that warrant an increase in rations.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 379, §6082; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, §557(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1570; renumbered §8242, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(8), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1835.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6082(a) | 34 U.S.C. 902a. | Mar. 2, 1933, ch. 184, §1 (2d sentence), 47 Stat. 1423; Feb. 21, 1942, ch. 106, 56 Stat. 97. |
| 6082(b) | 34 U.S.C. 902b. | Mar. 2, 1933, ch. 184, §2, 47 Stat. 1423. |
| 6082(c) | 34 U.S.C. 902c. | Mar. 2, 1933, ch. 184, §3, 47 Stat. 1423. |

In subsection (a) the words "issued to each person entitled thereto" are omitted as surplusage. In clause (2) the words "or fresh" and in clause (6) the words "together with" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6082 of this title as this section.

1990—Pub. L. 101–510 substituted "Rations" for "Navy ration: composition" in section catchline and amended text generally, substituting subsecs. (a) to (d) for former subsecs. (a) to (c) which specified the contents and quantities of the Navy ration in detail, authorized issuance of articles in addition to the authorized quantities, and provided for increases in the daily allowance of provisions on certain vessels or at certain stations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Authority

Authority of President under subsecs. (a) and (d) of this section to prescribe uniform military ration applicable to Navy delegated to Secretary of Defense by section 3(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 12781, Nov. 20, 1991, 56 F.R. 59203, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
### [§169. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVI, §1601(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1722]

Section, added Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVI, §1601(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2101, related to United States Space Command for carrying out joint space warfighting operations. See chapter 908 of this title.
§ 558.2 Review of notice of results for a key employee or primary management official. ( a ) Upon receipt of a complete notice of results for a key employee or primary management official as required by § 556.6(b)(2) of this chapter, the Chair has 30 days to request additional information from a tribe concerning the applicant or licensee and to object.
( b ) If the Commission has no objection to issuance of a license, it shall notify the tribe within thirty (30) days of receiving notice of results pursuant to § 556.6(b)(2) of this chapter.
( c ) If, within the 30-day period described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Commission provides the tribe with a statement itemizing objections to the issuance of a license to a key employee or to a primary management official applicant for whom the tribe has provided a notice of results, the tribe shall reconsider the application, taking into account the objections itemized by the Commission. The tribe shall make the final decision whether to issue a license to such applicant.
( d ) If the tribe has issued the license before receiving the Commission's statement of objections, notice and hearing shall be provided to the licensee as provided by § 558.4.
[78 FR 5280, Jan. 25, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 21826, Apr. 12, 2013]
§ 700.121 Statement of the basis for the determination of fair market value. At the time of the initiation of negotiations to acquire the habitations and/or improvements, the Commission shall furnish the owner, along with the initial written purchase offer, a written statement of the basis for the determination of fair market value. To the extent permitted by the Commission, the statement shall include the following— ( a ) A description and location identification of the habitations and/or improvements to be acquired.
( b ) An inventory identifying the buildings, structures, fixtures, and other improvements, including appurtenant removable building equipment, which are considered to be part of the habitations and/or improvements for which the offer of fair market value is made.
( c ) A recital of the amount of the offer and a declaration that such amount— ( 1 ) Is the full amount believed by the Commission to be just compensation for the property and is not less than the fair market value of the property as determined on the basis of the appraisal(s);
( 2 ) Does not reflect any relocation payments or other relocation assistance which the owner is entitled to receive.
( d ) If only a portion of a habitation and/or improvement is to be acquired, an apportionment of the total estimated just compensation for the partial acquisition will be made. In the event that the Commission determines that partial acquisitions are necessary, all portions so acquired will be acquired simultaneously.
Exhibit 99.8














May 6, 2015
 
 Consent of Independent Auditor
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 of Crescent Point Energy Corp. our report dated March 10, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. We also consent to reference to us under the heading "Interests of Experts", which appears in the Annual Information Form included in the Exhibit incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F.
 
 
 
 
 
 Image
 Chartered Accountants
 
     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants
 111 5 Avenue SW, Suite 3100, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 5L3
 T: +1 403 509 7500, F: +1 403 781 1825, www.pwc.com/ca
 
 “PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member
 firm of which is a separate legal entity.
NO. 07-07-0207-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JUNE 30, 2008

______________________________

PEDRO MENDEZ, APPELLANT

V.

CITY OF AMARILLO, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 95089-D; HONORABLE KELLY G. MOORE, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

CONCURRING OPINION

I join in the Court’s judgment and in its opinion, with the exception of the Court’s

citation of section 311.034 of the Government Code. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 311.034

(Vernon Supp. 2007). I do not think section 311.034 has any application to this election

contest. See Igal v. Brightstar Information Technology Group, Inc., 250 S.W.3d 78, 84 n.6

(Tex. 2008).

James T. Campbell

 Justice
U.S. EPA FACT SHEET

HAWAII REGIONAL HAZE – PROPOSED FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION 

PLAN

May 14, 2012

Today’s Action: 

EPA is proposing a plan to address the requirements for reducing regional haze and improving 

visibility at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park on the Big Island, and Haleakala National Park on 

Maui. 

The plan proposes a cap on pollution from the Kanoelehua Hill Generating Station, Shipman 

Power Plant and the Puna Power Plant on the Big Island. It is likely that the cap could be met 

through energy conservation and increased reliance on renewable energy already planned as part 

of Hawaii’s Clean Energy Initiative.

EPA is accepting public comments on this proposal for 30 days following publication in the 

Federal Register. We are also holding informational open houses and public hearings (see details 

below).

EPA’s plan is designed to achieve the following: 

Reasonable progress toward achieving visibility goals at the Volcanoes National Park and 

Haleakala National Park in the first planning period through 2018

A determination of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for the Kanoelehua Hill 

Generating Station on the Big Island

Background: 

Regional Haze is visibility impairment caused by fine particle pollution. This haze obscures the view of 

scenery and objects at a distance, reducing the beauty of our protected natural areas. 

Congress set the goal of the “prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of 

visibility in mandatory Class I Federal areas which impairment results from manmade air pollution.” 

These Class I areas in the U.S. include 156 national parks and national wilderness areas. 

Under EPA’s Regional Haze Rule, the states are required to establish long-term strategies for making 

reasonable progress toward achieving natural visibility in Class 1 areas.

Additional Information and Opportunities for Public Comment: 

EPA is holding informational open houses and public hearings at the following times and locations:

Date: May 31, 2012

Time: Open House: 5:30-6:30 pm

Public Hearing 6:30-8:30 pm

Location: The University of Hawaii, Maui College in the Pilina Multipurpose Room

310 W. Kaahumanu Avenue 

Kahului, Hawaii 96732 

Date: June 1, 2012

Time: Open House: 4:30-5:30 pm

Public Hearing: 5:30-7:30 pm
2

Location: Waiakea High School in the Cafeteria

155 W. Kawili Street 

Hilo, Hawaii 96720

Instructions for submitting comments on EPA’s proposal during the public comment period can 

be found at http://www.regulations.gov and Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0345. 

For more information, visit http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/actions/hawaii.html
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 267 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        August 2, 1999.
Whereas Shuttle Mission STS-93 successfully deployed the Chandra X-Ray 
        Observatory;
Whereas the Chandra X-Ray Observatory will provide scientists from around the 
        world with a better understanding of the structure and evolution of the 
        universe;
Whereas Shuttle Mission STS-93 is the first mission in the history of the United 
        States space program to be commanded by a woman;
Whereas women continue to be underrepresented in the science, engineering, and 
        technology fields;
Whereas the selection of Colonel Eileen Collins as the first female space 
        shuttle commander has raised the level of awareness and appreciation of 
        women's contributions in the advancement of science; and
Whereas Colonel Eileen Collins' accomplishments in the United States space 
        program have made her a role model for women pursuing an education and 
        career in scientific fields: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the crew of Shuttle Mission STS-93 and honors 
        Colonel Eileen Collins on being the first female commander of a United 
        States space shuttle;
            (2) recognizes the important contribution Colonel Eileen Collins has 
        made to the United States space program and to the advancement of women 
        in science; and
            (3) invites Colonel Eileen Collins and the crew of STS-93 to the 
        United States Capitol to be honored and recognized by the House of 
        Representatives for their achievements.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Lawrence P. Castellani, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance Stores Company, Incorporated for the quarterly period ended October 5, 2002 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Advance StoresCompany, Incorporated.

|  
 
 
Date:  November 19, 2002

 

 /s/ Lawrence P. Castellani
 
 By:
 
Name:

**Lawrence P. Castellani**

 
Title:

**Chief Executive Officer**

I, Jimmie L. Wade, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance Stores Company, Incorporated for the quarterly period ended October 5, 2002 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofAdvance Stores Company, Incorporated.

 
 
 
Date:  November 19, 2002

 

 /s/ Jimmie L. Wade
 
 By:
 
Name:

**Jimmie L. Wade**

 
Title:

**President and Chief Financial Officer** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1084

ARTHUR TRACY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-1031-7)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Tracy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Tracy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint for failure to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Tracy v. Virginia, No. CA-01-1031-7 (W.D. Va. filed Dec. 26, 2001;

entered Dec. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 535

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning use of

additional projected surplus funds to supplement Medicare funding, previously reduced under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27, 2000

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself and Mrs. WILSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in

addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a priod to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning use of additional projected surplus funds to supplement Medicare funding, previously reduced under the

Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

Whereas Congress is responsible for oversight and spending

under the Medicare program;

Whereas the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 was passed in response to major economic concerns about inflation in

costs in the Medicare program;

Whereas the savings resulting from enactment of that Act exceeded the estimates at the time of enactment and has
2

•HRES 535 IH

resulted in payment rates for classes of providers below

the rates previously anticipated;

Whereas the Congress adjusted some elements of the Medicare program in the Balanced Budget Refinement Act of

1999;

Whereas a significant number of Medicare+Choice organizations is withdrawing, or considering withdrawing, from

the Medicare+Choice program because of inadequate reimbursement rates;

Whereas the Medicare prescription drug bill pending in the

Congress will delay the date by which Medicare+Choice

organizations must decide whether to remain in the

Medicare+Choice program from July 1, 2000, to October

1, 2000; and

Whereas, because of improved economic performance, it is

anticipated that the Congressional Budget Office in its

mid-year reestimates will project dramatically increased

non-Social Security surpluses above those assumed in the

adoption of the most recent Congressional Budget Resolution for fiscal year 2001: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that, upon receipt of such mid-year CBO re3 estimates, the House of Representatives shall promptly as4 sess the budgetary implications of such reestimates and

5 provide for appropriate adjustments to the Medicare pro6 gram during this legislative session.

Æ