alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 to 2009 10-Q

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of Convergys Corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4,
2009 (the Report), I, David F. Dougherty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David F. Dougherty 
|David F. Dougherty     
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|November 4, 2009       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Convergys Corporation and will be retained by Convergys Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Johnny Bailey, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-188;

Second District

December 18, 1974.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE RECHENMACHER.

*246William N. Twohey, of Ottawa, for appellant.

Patrick Ward, State’s Attorney, of Dixon, and James W. Jerz and Charles D. Sheehy, both of Illinois State’s Attorney Ass’n, of Elgin, for the People.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Información Para Nuevos Participantes 
-  Crédito Tributario Por Seguro de Salud (HCTC) 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov’s English home page for more information available in English.

# Crédito Tributario por Seguro de Salud (HCTC)

##  **El Crédito Tributario por Seguro de Salud expiró el**

## **31 de diciembre, 2021.** 

Para mas información vea el sitio del IRS Crédito Tributario por Seguro de Salud.

El Crédito Tributario por Seguro de Salud, o HCTC (siglas en inglés) fue un crédito tributario administrado por el IRS de cobertura del 72.5% de primas del seguro médico. El HCTC aplicó a ciertas personas entre 55 años y hasta 65 años de edad que reciben beneficios de PBGC.

Para asistencia con respecto al HCTC, llame al número gratis del IRS 844-853-7210 or envíe un correo electrónico a:wi.hctc.stakehldr.en@irs.gov.

##  

 

 

Enero 19, 2022

Déjenos sus comentarios
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOS International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis LaVorgna, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\ Dennis LaVorgna
|-------------------

Dennis LaVorgna

Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

|August 21, 2006
|---------------

---
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

94-4 

August 9, 1994 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] >4006(a)(3)(E)> 

OPINION: 

I write in response to your request for our opinion regarding whether a plan that is at the full funding limitation,

taking into account as part of plan assets any credit balance, is exempt from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's

variable rate premium. 

Section 4006(a)(3)(E)(v) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §

1306(a)(3)(E)(v), provides an exemption from the variable rate premium "for any plan year if, as of the close of the

preceding plan year, contributions to the plan for the preceding plan year were not less than the full funding limitation

for the preceding plan year under section 412(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986." IRC § 412(c)(7), in turn,

defines the full funding limitation as the excess of a measure of the plan's liabilities (i.e., the lesser of (1) 150% of current

liability, or (2) 100% of accrued liability) over a measure of the plan's assets (i.e., the lesser of the fair market value or

the actuarial value of assets). 

In determining whether the full funding limitation exemption from the variable rate premium is met, adjustments

to the plan's assets that may be required when calculating [*2] the full funding limitation for purposes of determining

the minimum required contribution under IRC § 412 are inapplicable. Specifically, assets need not be reduced by the

amount of any credit balance in the plan's funding standard account under IRC § 412. 

We further note that, while the full funding limitation is determined as of the close of the preceding plan year,

contributions for that preceding plan year may be made prior to the close of the year. In such cases, whether the

contributions equal the full funding limitation is determined by adding to those contributions the interest credit allowed

under IRC § 412. 

Thus, a plan that is at the full funding limitation, taking into account as part of plan assets any credit balance and

any interest credit under IRC § 412 for contributions made prior to the close of the preceding plan year, is exempt from

the variable rate premium. If you have further questions, please let us know. 

Carol Connor Flowe 

General Counsel
### §885. Art. 85. Desertion

(a) Any member of the armed forces who—

(1) without authority goes or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to remain away therefrom permanently;

(2) quits his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service; or

(3) without being regularly separated from one of the armed forces enlists or accepts an appointment in the same or another one of the armed forces without fully disclosing the fact that he has not been regularly separated, or enters any foreign armed service except when authorized by the United States;

is guilty of desertion.

(b) Any commissioned officer of the armed forces who, after tender of his resignation and before notice of its acceptance, quits his post or proper duties without leave and with intent to remain away therefrom permanently is guilty of desertion.

(c) Any person found guilty of desertion or attempt to desert shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, but if the desertion or attempt to desert occurs at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 67.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 885(a)885(b) | 50:679(a).50:679(b). | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 85), 64 Stat. 135. |
| 885(c) | 50:679(c). | |

885(b)

50:679(b).

In subsection (a), the word "unit" is substituted for the words "place of service" to conform to clause (2) of this section and section 886(3) of this title. The word "proper" is omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (b), the word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity. The word "before" is substituted for the words "prior to". The words "its acceptance" are substituted for the words "the acceptance of the same". The words "after tender of" are substituted for the words "having tendered" for clarity. The word "due" is omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (c), the words "attempt to desert" are substituted for the words "attempted desertion".
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.153 Does an Indian tribe or tribal organization have any options besides an appeal?

Yes. The Indian tribe or tribal organization may request an informal conference. An informal conference is a way to resolve issues as quickly as possible, without the need for a formal hearing. The Indian tribe or tribal organization may also choose to sue in U.S. District Court under section 102(b)(3) and section 110(a) of the Act.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50621 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JUANA VERONICA ROCHA DE SEPULVEDA, also known as Veronica RochaAcosta Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-161-ALL
Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juana Veronica Rocha de Sepulveda appeals her sentence following her guilty plea conviction for importation of over 50 kilograms of marijuana and possession with the intent to distribute over 50 kilograms of marijuana. She argues that the district court clearly erred in denying her a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. Rocha de Sepulveda contends that she was a mere courier whowas substantially less culpable than other participants in the United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D February 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50621

2 offense. She further argues that if the Guidelines were not properly calculated, her sentence is not entitled to a presumption of reasonableness. Whether a defendant is a minor or minimal participant is a factual determination reviewed for clear error. U nited States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 & n.9 (5th Cir. 2005). Pursuant to § 3B1.2, a district court may decrease a defendant’s offense level by two levels if the defendant was a minor participant. An adjustment for a minor role applies to a defendant “who is less culpable than most other participants, but whose role could not be described as minimal.” § 3B1.2, comment. (n.5). The district court did not clearly err in denying Rocha de Sepulveda a minor role adjustment, and the Guidelines were properly calculated. See United States v. Atanda, 60 F.3d 196, 199 (5th Cir. 1995); U nited States v. NevarezArreola, 885 F.2d 243, 245 (5th Cir. 1989); United States v. Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 137-38 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### [§2410e. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2301(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3321]

Section, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VIII, §813(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2452, directed Secretary of Defense to propose, for inclusion in Federal Acquisition Regulation, regulations relating to certification of contract claims, requests for equitable adjustment to contract terms, and requests for relief under section 1431 et seq. of Title 50, War and National Defense, that exceeded $100,000.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

For effective date and applicability of repeal, see section 10001 of Pub. L. 103–355, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 8752 of this title.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 248

Commending and congratulating the United States Women’s National Soccer

Team for winning the 1999 Women’s World Cup soccer tournament.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 14, 1999

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD (for herself, Mrs. CAPPS, Mrs. MALONEY of New York,

and Mrs. KELLY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Commending and congratulating the United States Women’s

National Soccer Team for winning the 1999 Women’s

World Cup soccer tournament.

Whereas the third annual Women’s World Cup of soccer was

hosted by the United States;

Whereas the 1999 Women’s World Cup was the largest women’s soccer world championship in history;

Whereas 16 nations participated in the 1999 Women’s World

Cup, signaling a growth for women’s soccer throughout

the world;

Whereas 31 matches were played before more than 650,000

fans in seven cities across the United States, with four

matches drawing crowds of more than 65,000;
2

•HRES 248 IH

Whereas the United States Women’s National Soccer Team

has a record of accomplishment, having won the first-ever

1991 Women’s World Cup and the 1996 Olympics, and

placing third in the 1996 Women’s World Cup;

Whereas the United States Women’s National Soccer Team

is noted for its over-arching commitment to teamwork,

and is known in international competition for its devotion

to sportsmanship and fair play;

Whereas the 1999 Women’s World Cup of soccer symbolizes

an emerging role for young American women in sports

and society;

Whereas the 1999 Women’s World Cup of soccer speaks to

parents about the importance of athletic participation for

building the character and confidence of their daughters;

Whereas the United States has produced the best women’s

soccer team in the world, without a full-time professional

women’s league, relying instead on college soccer programs to provide a competitive environment for players;

Whereas title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 has

played a valuable role in strengthening women’s college

sports programs, creating opportunities for women to

participate and compete at an advanced level in soccer

and many other sports;

Whereas over 90,000 fans attended the championship final

between the United States and China, which is a record

for a women-only sporting event; and

Whereas the United States women’s soccer team defeated

China on July 10, 1999, with a 5 to 4 penalty kick victory: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HRES 248 IH

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends and congratulates the United States Women’s Na3 tional Soccer Team for winning the 1999 Women’s World

4 Cup soccer tournament.

Æ
[EXHIBIT 99.2]
                             CERTIFICATIONS
                             --------------

I, Donald L. Kolasch, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Link Plus
Corporation.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 for the registrant
and have:

     a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;

     b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);

     a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses
in internal controls; and

     b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions, with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 20, 2003


/s/ Donald L. Kolasch
---------------------
Donald L. Kolasch, President
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 941 05-3901
Mr. Eric Massey 

## SEP 092013 Director, Air Quality Division Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality 1110 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Dear We have received yourletter dated April 29, 2013 regardingthe U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency’s “March 12, 2013 Finding ofIncompleteness for [the] ArizonaNew Source Review State Implementation Plan (NSR SIP) Submission.” Given the explanations provided in your letter, we hereby withdraw our incompleteness determination and find that the NSR SIP submitted bythe Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) on October29, 2012, became complete by operation oflaw under section 1 10(k)(1)(B) ofthe Clean Air Act on April 29, 2013.
As you correctly note, EPA regulations statethat each SIP submission must contain “a copy ofthe official State regulationldocument signed, stamped and datedby the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State” and, wheneverpossible, indicating its effective date in the regulation itself. 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, section 2.1(d). Although in most cases the “official” copy ofan enforceable State regulation is published in clean form, we now understand that the regulations submitted by ADEQ as part ofthe NSR SIP submission are fully enforceable andthat ADEQ intends forthe submitted rules (with track changes) to be incorporated by reference into the Arizona SIP.
We note, however, that rules submitted for incorporation byreference (IBR) into a SIP must satisfy the requirements of 1 CFRpart 51, including requirements that such material be “published” material that is

‘reasonably available to anduseablebythe class ofpersons affectedbythe publication.” I CFR 51 .7(a)(2) and (a)(4). Accordingly, we request a written assurance from ADEQ that a published copy ofthe submitted NSR rules (with track changes) is readily available to the regulatedparties.’ We appreciate ADEQ’s continued efforts to expeditethe Arizona Secretary ofState’s official publication oftheserules in the Arizona Administrative Code (AAC) and encourage ADEQ to submit clean copies ofthe rules, as published in the AAC, as soon as theybecome available. In the meantime, we will continue ourreview of the submittedNSR rules. Ifyou have any questions regarding our completeness review, please contact Lisa Beckham at (415) 972-3811 or beckham.lisaepa.gov. Sincerely, ____



# D&J’17 Director, Air Division

‘It appears that this version ofthe NSR rules (with track changes) is not available to the general public at http://www.azsos.gov/public services/Title I 8/I 8-02.htrn#Article 3.

Printed Oil I?eeo led Pn,p’r
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 391 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 391

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 1999

Mr. Frost submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Baca of California.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Baca of California.
                                 <all>
```
§ 700.605 Relocation assistance. ( a ) Each eligible head of household of Hopi reservation evictees shall be entitled to receive the following assistance: ( 1 ) Relocation advisory services as provided in § 700.135 of this part;
( 2 ) Moving and search expenses, as provided in § 700.151 of this part;
( 3 ) Replacement housing payments as set forth below.
( b ) ( 1 ) If the head of household owns no dwelling, the Commission will make funds available to the head of household as provided in these regulations for the acquisition of a replacement home in one of the following manners: ( i ) Purchase of an existing home by the head of household,
( ii ) Contracting by the head of household for the construction of a home,
( iii ) Participation or purchase by the head of household in a mutual help housing or other home ownership project under the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (50 Stat. 888, as amended; 42 U.S.C. 1401) or in any other federally assisted housing program.
( 2 ) If the eligible head of household owns or is buying or building a home, the Commission will expend relocation benefits in one of the following manners: ( i ) If the home is decent, safe and sanitary, but is encumbered by a mortgage, such mortgage existing as of the effective date of these regulations, the Commission may expend replacement housing benefits up to the maximum then existing replacement home benefit to accelerate to the maximum extent possible the achievement by that household of debt-free home ownership.
( ii ) If the home is owned free and clear but does not meet Commission decent, safe and sanitary standards; or the home is neither owned free and clear, nor is decent, safe and sanitary, the Commission will, at its discretion either: ( A ) Expend replacement home benefits for improvements to assure the home meets the Commission's decent, safe and sanitary standards, or
( B ) Expend replacement home benefits for the acquisition of a replacement dwelling as if the eligible head of household or spouse did not own a home as in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) If the home is decent, safe and sanitary, and is owned free and clear, no replacement housing benefits will be paid.
( 4 ) The amount of the replacement housing payment shall be calculated in accordance with § 700.183 of these rules except that no compensation will be paid for habitation and improvements.
( 5 ) The determination of whether the head of household of Hopi reservation evictees currently occupies a decent, safe and sanitary dwelling shall be made in accordance with § 700.55 of these rules.
(C) If the head of household has received equivalent assistance from other federal agencies as defined in § 700.601(d), they shall not be entitled to additional assistance from the Commission.