alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 452 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 452

Recognizing the efforts of the National Association of Letter Carriers 
                       for its annual food drive.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2000

 Ms. Lofgren submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the efforts of the National Association of Letter Carriers 
                       for its annual food drive.

Whereas this Nation, so great in wealth and prosperity, is still the home for 30 
        million men, women, and children who have neither wealth nor prosperity 
        and who suffer daily from hunger;
Whereas food donations across the Nation traditionally decline sharply during 
        the spring and summer months and endanger the millions of people who 
        depend on these contributions;
Whereas the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC), having recognized 
        this crisis, began its national food drive some eight years ago and 
        collected millions of pounds of food every year since;
Whereas in 1999, more than 1,500 local NALC branches in more than 10,000 cities 
        and towns across the United States performed the extraordinary feat of 
        collecting 58.4 million pounds of food for the needy;
Whereas the eighth annual NALC Food Drive will take place on Saturday, May 13, 
        2000;
Whereas 95 million postcards will arrive at homes across the United States 
        during the week before the drive urging donations by postal customers;
Whereas this national effort to ``Stamp Out Hunger'' is the world's largest 
        single-day food drive and the largest single volunteer event in America 
        each year;
Whereas letter carriers will be collecting food as well as mail at mailboxes 
        across the country, performing their daily job and collecting food for 
        the hungry, come rain or shine; and
Whereas the NALC food drive will greatly help the millions of Americans who 
        depend on food banks across the Nation and should serve as a model of 
        the level of effort and dedication needed to combat the hunger that 
        ravages the country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the members of the National Association 
        of Letter Carriers for their hard work on behalf of the 
        millions of Americans who go hungry each day; and
            (2) encourages all Americans to follow their example and 
        donate food to the hungry and to this food drive on May 13, 
        2000, by placing nonperishable food by their mailboxes.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Multiemployer Plans 
-  Multiemployer Insolvent Plan Administrative Expense FAQs 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Multiemployer Insolvent Plan Administrative Expense FAQs

##             Who pays for an insolvent plan’s administrative expenses?          

The plan continues to pay service providers and the plan receives financial assistance from PBGC to pay its reasonable administrative expenses.

##             Does PBGC have a list of approved administrative expenses that it defines as reasonable?          

No, but PBGC provides general advice to plan administrators and trustees concerning what is reasonable.  PBGC reserves the right to approve unique expenditures from time-to-time with adequate explanation.

##             Is there a limit to how much financial assistance can be requested for reimbursement by PBGC for administrative expenses?          

No, expense amounts always vary by plan.  These variations are a result of plan size, geographic location, legal matters, etc.

##             What are some of the common administrative expenses PBGC ordinarily funds with financial assistance?          

Administrative employees (either union office or third-party), legal and attorney fees, actuarial fees, accountant fees, rent, telephone/internet, fiduciary insurance, office supplies, postage, record retention/storage, etc.

##             How does a plan’s administrative expenses impact participants’ benefits?          

The amount of a plan’s administrative expenses has no impact on participants’ benefits in an insolvent multiemployer plan.  Participants will always receive their guaranteed benefit regardless of the amount of administrative expenses post-insolvency.

##             What does PBGC do to ensure that the administrative expenses paid for with financial assistance are reasonable and necessary to the operations of the plan?          

PBGC auditors review all expenses submitted for reimbursement by the plan to PBGC for reasonableness.  Any concerns PBGC has resulting from these reviews will be resolved on a case-by-case basis with the responsible plan professionals.

March 4, 2020
# CA2006317EN.01000901.xml

| 23.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 317/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 317/9

---

RESERVE LIST

RESERVE LIST

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/12/06

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/12/06

ASSISTANTS (AST 3) IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

ASSISTANTS (AST 3) IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

(Latvian language)

(2006/C 317 A/07)

| AMOLINA | Ilze |
| --- | --- |
| BALDINA | Agnese |
| BIKERNIECE | Maija |
| BURKEVICA | Ilze |
| CIMINA | Inta |
| DRIKE | Liga |
| ERTS | Raimonds |
| GRINFELDE | Aija |
| JANSONE | Inta |
| LABLAIKA | Ilona |
| LIEPINA | Ieva |
| LURINA | Ilze |
| MUIZNIECE | Liena |
| NAUMOVA | Evita |
| OSLEJA | Dace |
| RODINA | Zaiga |
| SMAUKSTELIS | Juris |
| SPROGE | Ilona |
| VEGIS | Peteris |
| VISOCKA | Sarmite |

AMOLINA

Ilze

BALDINA

Agnese

BIKERNIECE

Maija

BURKEVICA

Ilze

CIMINA

Inta

DRIKE

Liga

ERTS

Raimonds

GRINFELDE

Aija

JANSONE

Inta

LABLAIKA

Ilona

LIEPINA

Ieva

LURINA

Ilze

MUIZNIECE

Liena

NAUMOVA

Evita

OSLEJA

Dace

RODINA

Zaiga

SMAUKSTELIS

Juris

SPROGE

Ilona

VEGIS

Peteris

VISOCKA

Sarmite

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Japanese Thank Soldiers for Tsunami, Earthquake Recovery Assistance 

By David VergunU.S. Army

                WASHINGTON  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Tsunami

Earthquake Recovery Assistance

pacom

news

articles
§ 273.127 Can a contract include funds to support the duties of an Indian Education Committee? Programs developed or approved by the Indian Education Committee may, at the option of such Committee, include funds for the performance of Committee duties to include: ( a ) Members' attendance at regular and special meetings, workshops and training sessions, as the Committee deems appropriate.
( b ) Other reasonable expenses incurred by the Committee in performing its primary duties, including the planning, development, implementation and evaluation of the program.
#### § 162.601 Fort Belknap Reservation.

Not to exceed 20,000 acres of allotted and tribal lands (non-irrigable as well as irrigable) on the Fort Belknap Reservation in Montana may be leased for the culture of sugar beets and other crops in rotation for terms not exceeding ten years.

[66 FR 7109, Jan. 22, 2001. Redesignated at 77 FR 72494, Dec. 5, 2012 and correctly redesignated at 78 FR 27860, May 13, 2013]
### §20301. Original enlistments: qualifications; grade

(a) Original Enlistments.—

(1) Authority to accept.—The Secretary of the Air Force may accept original enlistments in the Space Force of qualified, effective, and able-bodied persons.

(2) Age.—A person accepted for original enlistment shall be not less than seventeen years of age. However, no person under eighteen years of age may be originally enlisted without the written consent of the person's parent or guardian, if the person has a parent or guardian entitled to the person's custody and control.

(b) Grade.—A person is enlisted in the Space Force in the grade prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1717(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 654.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATION

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §493, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383, substituted "SUBCHAPTER" for "SUBCHAPER".
§ 700.159 Payment for direct loss of personal property—nonresidential moves. ( a ) *General.* A certified eligible business is entitled to payment for actual direct loss of an item of tangible personal property incurred as a result of moving or discontinuing his business, farm operation, or nonprofit organization. The payment shall consist of the reasonable costs incurred in attempting to sell the item plus the less of— ( 1 ) The fair market value of the item for continued use at the acquired site, less the proceeds from its sale. (When payment for property loss is claimed for goods held for sale, the fair market value shall be based on the cost of the goods to the business, not the potential selling price); or
( 2 ) The estimated cost of moving the item, but with no allowance for storage. (If the business, farm operation or nonprofit organization is discontinued, the estimated cost shall be based on a moving distance of 50 (fifty) miles.)
( b ) *Advertising sign.* The amount of a payment for direct loss of an advertising sign, which is personal property, shall be the lesser of— ( 1 ) The depreciated reproduction cost of the sign as determined by the Commission, less the proceeds from its sale; or
( 2 ) The estimated cost of moving the sign.
( c ) *Sales effort.* To be eligible for payment for direct loss of personal property, the claimant must make good faith effort to sell the personal property, unless the Commission determines that no such effort is necessary.
( d ) *Transfer of ownership.* To be eligible for payment for direct loss of personal property, the claimant shall transfer to the Commission ownership of the unsold personal property.
151 So.2d 773

#### STATE of Alabama v. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA.

3 Div. 936.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April *4,*1963.

*41MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., Guy Sparks, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Wm. H. Burton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Caffey, Gallalee & Caffey, Mobile, for appellee.

COLEMAN, Justice.

There is no organization of court appearing in the record. This court has held that an appeal must be dismissed where the record fails to show the organization of the court as required by Rule 24 of the Supreme Court. Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled 1958, Title 7, Appendix; 261 Ala. XXVIII. This matter is jurisdictional and the court must take notice of it ex mero motu. Barnes v. Salter, 270 Ala. 110, 116 So.2d 748; Prince v. Hammock, 265 Ala. 255, 90 So.2d 672; Glenn v. Sutton, 265 Ala. 154, 90 So.2d 227; Powell v. Powell, 265 Ala. 48, 89 So.2d 530; West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644, 89 So.2d 170; Reynolds v. Henson, 264 Ala. 435, 87 So.2d 856; McPherson v. Stallworth, 262 Ala. 367, 78 So.2d 924; Garrard v. State ex rel. Waid, 260 Ala. 486, 71 So.2d 59; Pensacola, A. & W. R. Co. v. Big Sandy Iron Co., 147 Ala. 274, 41 So. 418.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 604 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 294
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 604

                          [Report No. 106-925]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 110) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2000

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 110) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 110) making further continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
                                                 House Calendar No. 294

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 604

                          [Report No. 106-925]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 110) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 2, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      4,112,437
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      325,929
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           992,979
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         926,535
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,357,880
<COMMON>                                           1,342
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      2,259,158
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              441,398
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 2,701,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            363,000
<PREFERRED>                                       84,359
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,663,040
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                     0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        103,950
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      1,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                              0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,440,633
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  6,357,880
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        538,469
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               5,540
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       501,686
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       507,226
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           31,243
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 4,434
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    35,677
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          26,661
<NET-INCOME>                                       9,016
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        8,688
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        328
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          57,692
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                         27,338
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            43,136
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00



</TABLE>
#### Michael F. Fritz, Respondent, v. John Knaub, as Second Assistant Engineer or Treasurer of Port Jervis Division No. 54 of the Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Mills at Special Term.* (Reported in 57 Mise. Rep. 405.) Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.

*

 Trial Term.— [Rep.
### SUBCHAPTER III—POSTCONFIRMATION MATTERS
# CA2006283EN.01000101.xml

| 21.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 283/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 283/1

---

Corrigendum to Notice of Open Competion EPSO/AD/45/06 to constitute a reserve pool from which to recruit linguistic administrators (AD5) having Irish as their main language in the field of translation

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 104 A of 3 May 2006
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 104 A of 3 May 2006

(2006/C 283 A/01)

On page 6, title C, point 5:

for:

for:

| ‘5. | Optional tests |
| --- | --- |

‘5.

The purpose of the optional tests is to enable you to display your full range of language knowledge. The marks obtained in these tests will not be taken into account by the selection board when it decides who will be on the reserve list and their ranking within it. Their purpose is to help the Institutions make the best use of the list when recruiting from it. Optional tests will be organised only for candidates who have obtained enough marks in the written and oraltests to be placed on the reserve list.’,

read:

read:

| ‘5. | Optional tests |
| --- | --- |

‘5.

The purpose of the optional tests is to enable you to display your full range of language knowledge. The marks obtained in these tests will not be taken into account by the selection board when it decides who will be on the reserve list and their ranking within it. Their purpose is to help the Institutions make the best use of the list when recruiting from it. Optional tests will be marked only for candidates who have obtained enough marks in the written and oral tests to be placed on the reserve list.’.

---
#### § 217.7 Implementation of decision.

The Secretary shall issue such documents as are necessary or expendient to implement the decisions of the joint managers, insofar as such issuance is authorized by law, and he shall execute and/or approve such documents for and on behalf of the joint managers, or either of them, and on behalf of the United States, as necessary. If it becomes necessary for the Secretary to execute an instrument on behalf of one or both of the joint managers and to approve the same instrument as trustee, two different officials having delegated authority from the Secretary shall serve as executing and approving officers, respectively.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41283

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

JOSE ROBERTO MEJIA-MEDINA

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-357-1

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Roberto Mejia-Medina (Mejia) appeals his sentence

following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. Mejia

argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light

of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Mejia’s

constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Mejia contends

that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a
No. 04-41283

-2-

majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in

light of Apprendi we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on

the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United

States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Mejia properly concedes that his

argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review.

Mejia also argues that the district court reversibly erred

under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), by sentencing

him pursuant to a mandatory application of the federal Sentencing

Guidelines. The Government concedes that Mejia has preserved

this issue for appeal. The Government, however, has not shown

beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless. See

United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Accordingly, Mejia’s sentence is VACATED, and this case is

REMANDED for resentencing.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR

RESENTENCING.