alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Keyan Yan,
the Chief Executive Officer of KBS FASHION GROUP LIMITED (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1.       The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has executed this statement this 16th day of May, 2017.



| | /s/
    Keyan Yan                
| | ---------------------------------
| | Keyan
    Yan                    
| | Chief
    Executive Officer      
| | (Principal
    Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to KBS Fashion Group Limited and will be retained by KBS Fashion Group Limited and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### § 700.553 Use of official titles.

Employees are prohibited from using their official titles in conducting private business or participation in private or public group activities not concerned with official duties. Use is strictly limited to those occasions and circumstances where representation is official.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                     U.S.C.
                                 SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  KeySpan   Corporation   (the
"Corporation")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert B.  Catell,  Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Corporation,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Corporation.


                                             /s/Gerald Luterman
                                             ------------------
                                             Name: Gerald Luterman
                                             Title: Executive Vice President
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
                                             Date: May 1, 2003
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated March 3, 2015, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Property L.P., and certain other parties thereto, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Dated: March 16, 2016





/s/ Bryan K. DavisBryan K. DavisChief Financial Officer, Brookfield Property Group LLC
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp.

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-C6,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C6

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of April 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 41.55 How are grant funds processed? ( a ) BIE will identify the budget request for Diné College separately in its annual budget justification.
( b ) BIE will not commingle funds appropriated for grants under this subpart with appropriations that are historically expended by the Bureau of Indian Affairs for programs and projects normally provided on the Navajo Reservation for Navajo beneficiaries.
§ 39.404 What is the certification and verification process? ( a ) Each school must: ( 1 ) Certify that the files required by § 39.403 are complete and accurate; and
( 2 ) Compile a student roster that includes a complete list of all students by grade, days of attendance, and supplemental services.
( b ) The chief school administrator and the president of the school board are responsible for certifying the school's ADM and residential count is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge or belief and is supported by appropriate documentation.
( c ) OIEP's education line officer (ELO) will annually review the following to verify that the information is true and accurate and is supported by program documentation: ( 1 ) The eligibility of every student;
( 2 ) The school's ADM and supplemental program counts and residential count;
( 3 ) Evidence of accreditation;
( 4 ) Documentation for all provided basic and supplemental services, including all necessary documentation required by statute and regulations (*e.g.*, a current and complete Individual Education Plan for each student receiving supplemental services); and
( 5 ) Documentation required by subpart G of this part for student transportation to and from school provided by commercial carriers.
#### § 286.4 Eligible economic enterprises.

An economic enterprise as defined in § 286.1(k) is eligible to receive equity capital through non-reimbursable grants if it is or will be self-sustaining and profit-oriented and will create employment for Indians. In the case of Indian-owned cooperative associations, they must distribute or allocate profits for later distribution, to members who are patrons, unless prohibited from doing so by law.
# C_2006326EN.01006101.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/61

---

Action brought on 10 November 2006 — Reber v OHIM (Mozart)

(Case T-304/06)

(2006/C 326/131)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Paul Reber GmbH & Co. KG (Bad Reichenhall, Germany) (represented by: O. Spuhler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (Kilchberg, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 8 September 2006 in appeal case R 97/2005-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 8 September 2006 in appeal case R 97/2005-2;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘Mozart’ for goods in Class 30 (Community trade mark No 21 071).

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark concerned.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of the duty under Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) to state the reasons on which a decision is based, infringement by the Office of its duty under Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 to examine the facts of its own motion, infringement of the principle of good faith and infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2006294EN.01006101.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/61

---

Action brought on 9 October 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v ECB

(Case T-279/06)

(2006/C 294/122)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the ECB to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the ECB to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor;

| — | order ECB to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

—

order ECB to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submitted a bid in response to a call by the defendant for a negotiated tender for the provision of IT consultancy and IT development services to the European Central Bank (ECB) (OJ 2005/S 137-135354). The applicant contests the decision to reject its bid and to commence contractual negotiations with other bidders.

In support of its application, the applicant submits that the ECB unlawfully did not disclose the weighting of criteria and sub-criteria in the tender notice and that the ECB used vague terms to evaluate negatively the applicant's bid and thereby violated the principles of transparency and sound administration and failed to state reasons. Furthermore, the applicant claims that the ECB made several errors of appreciation under the evaluation of the applicant's offer. Finally the applicant alleges that the ECB introduced a specific term in the call for tender, which favoured German established companies, and thereby violated among others Articles 12 EC and 49 EC.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I, Eyal Bigon, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of InkSure Technologies Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 3, 2006


/s/ Eyal Bigon
--------------
Eyal Bigon
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
### §1468a. Advertising

No savings association shall carry on any sale, plan, or practices, or any advertising, in violation of regulations promulgated by a Federal banking agency.

(June 13, 1933, ch. 64, §12, as added Pub. L. 101–73, title III, §301, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 343; amended Pub. L. 111–203, title III, §369(10), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1565.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "a Federal banking agency" for "the Director".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the transfer date, see section 351 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 906 of Title 2, The Congress.
# C_2006163EN.01000101.xml

| 14.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 July 2006

(2006/C 163/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2692 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4597 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68970 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1818 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5620 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 94,52 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9280 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,520 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0415 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5878 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,633 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0155 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6827 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4378 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8698 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0546 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0091 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 204,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1607 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1470 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2518 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 556,07 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,645 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,398 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1880 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,151 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2692

JPY

Japanese yen

146,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4597

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68970

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1818

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5620

ISK

Iceland króna

94,52

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9280

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,520

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0415

RON

Romanian leu

3,5878

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,633

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0155

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6827

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4378

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8698

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0546

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0091

KRW

South Korean won

1 204,85

ZAR

South African rand

9,1607

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1470

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2518

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 556,07

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,645

PHP

Philippine peso

66,398

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1880

THB

Thai baht

48,151

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Barry W. Tackett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. for the
period ending June 30, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004

/s/Barry W. Tackett
Barry W. Tackett, CFO (Principal Financial Officer)
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00353

- CV

Estate of Glenda Rhoades,

Deceased §

§

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 2

of Parker County (CIV

- 13

- 0909)

September 8, 2016

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

Concurrence and dissent by Justice

Walker



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for fu rther

proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is further ordered that appellee Elise Kinler shall pay all of the costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

___________ Justi ce Bonnie Sudderth
#### § 304.6 Responsibility of dealer.

All dies will be numbered, and each wholesaler or dealer will be held responsible for any violation of standards in silver that bears his mark. Until such time as the Board relinquishes its sole right to mark silver, the responsibility of the dealer for whom silver is marked will be confined to misrepresentations as to quality of silver and of stones used for ornament and to methods of production.