alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

83-12 

May 20, 1983 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041 Termination by Plan Administrator 

OPINION: 

 This responds to correspondence dated * * *, and * * * in which PBGC was supplied with various factual

information and asked what would be the PBGC's position if notices of intent to terminate were submitted to PBGC

proposing the terminations of the * * * Pension Trust Plan and the * * * Retirement Plan (the "Plans") under the

circumstances described below. 

In correspondence and at subsequent meetings you indicated that the Plans are both covered under Title IV, and

represented that the Plans have sufficient assets to provide all benefits under their terms and that each Plan has residual

assets. It is * * * present intention to terminate the Plans and to distribute all plan benefits to participants, including a

10% pension increase, subject to union approval in the case of the * * * Pension Trust Plan. Residual assets would be

distributed to Co. pursuant to the Plans' provisions. 

You have also represented that * * * plans to establish two new defined benefit plans concomitantly with the

termination of the Plans, and that each new defined benefit plan will provide retirement benefits based only on future

service and no past service benefits. [*2] You advise that the new plans will cover basically the same participants as

the Plans and will have the same eligibility rules and somewhat more favorable vesting requirements and that in the new

plans the applicable percentage in the career average benefit formula will be slightly larger than the percentage in the

Plans. You have also advised that benefits provided by * * * contributions to two newly adopted profit-sharing plans

will reduce dollar for dollar the benefits payable under the defined benefit plans. 

 This will confirm our statement that the facts and circumstances in this case as described in the information, advice

and representations that you have submitted, will not cause the PBGC to reject properly completed Notices of Intent to

Terminate the Plans. 

Mitchell L. Strickler 

Acting General Counsel
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of RLJ Entertainment, Inc.; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | April 25, 2014 | /s/ ANDREW S. WILSON    |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|
|   |           | Andrew S. Wilson        |
|   |           | Chief Financial Officer |

----
### §919. Art. 119. Manslaughter

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who, with an intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm, unlawfully kills a human being in the heat of sudden passion caused by adequate provocation is guilty of voluntary manslaughter and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Any person subject to this chapter who, without an intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm, unlawfully kills a human being—

(1) by culpable negligence; or

(2) while perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate an offense, other than those named in clause (4) of section 918 of this title (article 118), directly affecting the person;

is guilty of involuntary manslaughter and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 73.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 919(a)919(b) | 50:713(a).50:713(b). | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 119), 64 Stat. 140. |

919(b)

50:713(b).

The word "named" is substituted for the word "specified".
### **CHAPTER 31—NATIONAL CONSUMER COOPERATIVE BANK**

Sec.
3001.
Congressional statement of findings and purpose.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION

3011.
Creation and charter; principal office; venue; purposes.
3012.
General corporate powers.
3013.
Board of Directors.
3014.
Capitalization.
3015.
Eligibility of cooperatives.
3016.
Annual meetings; notice, agenda, etc.
3017.
Bonds, debentures, notes and other evidences of indebtedness.
3017a.
Class A notes as paid-in capital of the Bank.
3018.
Loans.
3019.
Taxation by State, county, etc., taxing authority; Federal tax status.
3020.
Quarters and space for principal and other offices.
3021.
Annual report to Congress; contents.
3022.
Authorization of additional appropriations; restrictions on use.
3023.
Appeal procedures applicable upon denial or restriction of application for assistance.
3024.
Conflict of interest rules; adoption and publication; requirements.
3025.
Examination and audit.
3026.
Acceleration of the Final Government Equity Redemption Date.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—OFFICE OF SELF-HELP DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

3041.
Establishment; appointment, etc., of Director.
3042.
Authorization of appropriations for advances; deposits into separate Account in Bank; availability of amounts.
3043.
Advances.
3044.
Services and information for organization, financing, and management of cooperatives; availability; agreements for development and dissemination; funding.
3045.
Investigations and surveys respecting new services, etc., by cooperative not-for-profit organizations.
3046.
Financial analysis and market surveys at request of eligible cooperative.
3047.
Programs for training directors and staff of eligible cooperatives, and public education; development and availability; scope and implementation.
3048.
Cooperation with Federal agencies offering programs for consumer cooperatives in disseminating information.
3049.
Authorization of appropriations for administration; availability of amounts.
3050.
Fees for providing technical assistance services; waiver; accounting and availability.
3051.
Nonprofit corporation.
### [§227. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1061(f)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 443]

Section, added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title III, §374(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1636, directed Secretary of Defense to include recruiting costs in budget justification documents submitted to Congress each year in connection with submission of budget.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7307

COLLIS MILLER, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-92-2063-3-22)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Collis Miller, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Miller

v. South Carolina, No. CA-92-2063-3-22 (D.S.C. July 31, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### The Pierre Shale near Kremmling, Colorado, and its correlation to the east and the west

By: G. A. IzettW. A. CobbanJ. R. Gill

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp684A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Información Sobre Los Planes de PBGC 
-  Plan de Pensión de Dean Foods Consolidated 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov’s English home page for more information available in English.

# Plan de Pensión de Dean Foods Consolidated

El 18 de mayo de 2020, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation asumió la responsabilidad como fideicomisario del plan de pensiones de beneficio definido patrocinado por Dean Foods Company. El Plan de Pensión de Dean Foods Consolidated finalizó el **30 de abril de 2020**. El plan cubre a casi 10,000 trabajadores y jubilados de Dean Foods Company. PBGC ofrece la siguiente información a los participantes.

DEAN FOODS CONSOLIDATED PENSION PLAN

##           PREGUNTAS       

Preguntas y respuestas para los participantes en el Plan de Pensión de Dean Foods Consolidated

Preguntas Frecuentes sobre PBGC

##           CONTÁCTENOS      

Teléfono: 1-800-400-7242 (oprima 1)

Los usuarios de TTY/ASCII pueden llamar al 711

##           ACERCA      

Cómo opera PBGC

Déjenos sus comentarios
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 50 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 10, 1999.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on House Administration: Mr. Fattah of Pennsylvania and Mr. Davis 
of Florida.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*ANDRES TORRES

Decided June 30, 2004

*William B. Westcott,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Margaret Gaffney Radionovas,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 823 (AC 23744), is denied.
§ 175.115 How does BIA administer its electric power utilities? We promote efficient administration, operation, maintenance, and construction of our utilities by following and enforcing: ( a ) Applicable statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, Indian Affairs manuals, Operations Manuals;
( b ) Applicable written policies, procedures, directives, safety codes; and
( c ) Utility industry standards.
#### § 169.303 What happens if BIA denies a right-of-way document?

If we deny the right-of-way grant, renewal, amendment, assignment, or mortgage, we will notify the parties immediately and advise the landowners and the applicant of their right to appeal the decision under part 2 of this chapter.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00257-CV

Thomas Lancaster PRIDGEN III,

Appellant

v.

Susan PRIDGEN,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-00079

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 5, 2013

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of 

service to appellee, who has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against the 

party who incurred them.

PER CURIAM
### [§2436. Renumbered §4293]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2436, added Pub. L. 99–500, §101(c) [title X, §905(a)(1)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–82, 1783–134, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(c) [title X, §905(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–82, 3341–134; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title IX, formerly title IV, §905(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3914; renumbered title IX, Pub. L. 100–26, §3(5), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 273; amended Pub. L. 100–26, §7(b)(7), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 280; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VIII, §803(c), title XII, §1231(14), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1125, 1160; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, §1484(h)(4), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1718, related to establishment and conduct of the defense enterprise program, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §821(a)(5), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1704.
#### § 212.46 Inspection of premises, books, and accounts.

The provisions of § 211.46 of this subchapter are applicable to leases under this part.
### Issue of Farm-Loan Bonds
IV

House Calendar No. 322

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 653

[Report No. 106–1008]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 4942) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part

against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September

30, 2001, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, OCTOBER 25), 2000

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 4942) making appropriations

for the government of the District of Columbia and other

activities chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September

30, 2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 4942) making appropriations for
2

HRES 653 RH

1 the government of the District of Columbia and other ac2 tivities chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues

3 of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30,

4 2001, and for other purposes. All points of order against

5 the conference report and against its consideration are

6 waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Calendar No. 322

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 653

[Report No. 106–1008]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4942) making

appropriations for the government of the Districtof Columbia and other activities chargeable inwhole or in part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30,2001, and for other purposes.

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, OCTOBER 25), 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### SUBCHAPTER VI—ASSISTANCE TO FARM CREDIT SYSTEM
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 33 (Thursday, February 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IN07-26-004]


Brian Hunter; Third Supplemental Notice of Designation of 
Commission Staff

    On February 1, 2008, the Commission issued an order that, inter 
alia, designated the staff of the Office of Enforcement as non-
decisional in deliberations by the Commission in this proceeding, with 
the exception of the Director of the Office of Enforcement and the 
Directors of the Divisions of Investigations, Energy Market Oversight, 
Audits, and Financial Regulation. On May 6, 2008, in a Supplemental 
Notice of Designation of Commission Staff, Shauna Coleman, an attorney 
in the Office of Enforcement was designated as an additional exception 
to the designation of the Office of Enforcement as non-decisional.
    On August 20, 2009, the Commission issued the Second Supplemental 
Notice of Designation of Commission Staff designating Larry Gasteiger, 
Deputy Direction of the Office of Enforcement, and Max Minzner, Senior 
Counsel to the Director of the Office of Enforcement, as additional 
exceptions to the designation of the Office of Enforcement as non-
decisional. Mr. Minzner is no longer employed by the Commission.
    In this notice, the Commission designates James Meade, Attorney 
Advisor, as an additional exception to the designation of the Office of 
Enforcement as non-decisional. Mr. Meade joined the Office of 
Enforcement after the previous notices were issued and did not 
participate in the investigation at issue in this proceeding.

    Dated: February 10, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3622 Filed 2-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Kritzmacher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 5, 2011



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ JOHN A. KRITZMACHER
|John A. Kritzmacher    
|Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Speeches / Testimony

# Adm. John C. Aquilino at Pacific Future Forum

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

 

Admiral John C. Aquilino

Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Pacific Future Forum Keynote

HMS Prince of Wales, UK

Thursday, October 21, 2021

*(As Prepared)*

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
### §1221. Filing of plan

The debtor shall file a plan not later than 90 days after the order for relief under this chapter, except that the court may extend such period if the need for an extension is attributable to circumstances for which the debtor should not justly be held accountable.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 99–554, title II, §255, title III, §302(f), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3109, 3124; Pub. L. 103–65, §§1, 2, Aug. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 311; Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title I, §149(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–610; Pub. L. 106–5, §1(1), (2), Mar. 30, 1999, 113 Stat. 9; Pub. L. 106–70, §1, Oct. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1031; Pub. L. 107–8, §1, May 11, 2001, 115 Stat. 10; Pub. L. 107–17, §1, June 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 151; Pub. L. 107–170, §1, May 7, 2002, 116 Stat. 133; Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10814(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 532; Pub. L. 107–377, §2(a), Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3115; Pub. L. 108–73, §2(a), Aug. 15, 2003, 117 Stat. 891; Pub. L. 108–369, §2(a), Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1749; Pub. L. 109–8, title X, §1001(a)(1), (c), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 185, 186.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

For repeal of section effective Oct. 1, 1998, and subsequent reenactment of section, see note set out preceding section 1201 of this title.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–65 substituted "the need for an extension is attributable to circumstances for which the debtor should not justly be held accountable" for "an extension is substantially justified".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Pub. L. 103–65, §3, Aug. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 311, provided that:

"(a) Effective Date.—Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act [amending this section and provisions set out as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure] and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 6, 1993].

"(b) Application of Amendment Made by Section 2.—The amendment made by section 2 [amending this section] shall not apply with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code before the date of the enactment of this Act."

#### Effective Dates

Permanent reenactment of section effective July 1, 2005, see section 1001(a)(2) of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a Repeal, Reenactment, and Termination of Chapter note under section 1201 of this title. For effective dates of section and amendments extending periods for which section was reenacted prior to permanent reenactment, see Effective Date and Effective Date of 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Amendment notes set out under section 1201 of this title.