alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 700.285 Amendment of records.

The Privacy Act permits an individual to request amendment of a record pertaining to him if be believes the record is not accurate, relevant, timely or complete, 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(2). A request for amendment of a record shall be submitted in accordance with the procedures in this subpart.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Forests of Kansas**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
2020
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.163/16:
Item Number:0084-N-16 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001048632
 
March 8, 2018
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.117 What are the criteria for ruling on transfer petitions? Upon receipt of a transfer petition from an Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, or Tribe, the State court must transfer the child-custody proceeding unless the court determines that transfer is not appropriate because one or more of the following criteria are met: ( a ) Either parent objects to such transfer;
( b ) The Tribal court declines the transfer; or
( c ) Good cause exists for denying the transfer.
§ 573.5 When does an enforcement action become final agency action? An enforcement action shall become final agency action and a final order of the Commission when: ( a ) A respondent fails to appeal the enforcement action as provided for in subchapter H of this chapter and does not enter into a settlement agreement resolving the matter in its entirety; or
( b ) A respondent enters into a settlement agreement resolving the matter in its entirety at any time after the issuance of the enforcement action.
[77 FR 47519, Aug. 9, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 4324, Jan. 22, 2013]
### [§2666. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–375, div. B, title XXVIII, §2821(a)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2129]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 149, related to limitation on commission on a contract for the purchase of land payable from funds appropriated for the Department of Defense.
### [§2879. Renumbered §2857]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2879, added Pub. L. 104–106, div. B, title XXVIII, §2801(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 547, related to interim leases of completed units pending completion of a project to acquire or construct military family housing units or military unaccompanied housing units, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–314, div. B, title XXVIII, §2802(c)(1), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2703.
# C_2006332EN.01006701.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/67

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2006/C 332/13)

OJ C 303, 13.12.2006

OJ C 303, 13.12.2006

History of previous publications:

OJ C 317, 23.12.2006

OJ C 225, 19.9.2006

OJ C 184, 8.8.2006

OJ C 176, 28.7.2006

OJ C 151, 29.6.2006

OJ C 130, 3.6.2006

---
# C_2006306EN.01001601.xml

| 15.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4451 — Alcatel/Nortel Networks)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 306/06)

On 7 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4451. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4451. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 47

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that the 
      expenses of special-order speeches be paid from the Members 
    Representational Allowance of the Members making such speeches.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

 Ms. Rivers submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that the 
      expenses of special-order speeches be paid from the Members 
    Representational Allowance of the Members making such speeches.

    Resolved, That (a) rule XVII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``10. Expenses of any special-order speech shall be paid from the 
Members Representational Allowance of the Member making such speech.''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the 
first day beginning after the date of adoption of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
#### OLGA J. DISTEFANO *v.*JOSEPH E. MILARDO, JR., ET AL.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 838 (AC 23368), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court properly had instructed the jury that no attorney-client relationship existed between the named defendant, Joseph E. Milardo, Jr., and Lawrence J. DiStefano?”

*909The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17221.

Decided June 30, 2004

*Lawrence S. Dressier,*in support of the petition.

*Michael C. Conroy,*in opposition.

VERTEFEUILLE, J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
### SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL BANK SHARES
#### § 2.901 How do I request alternative dispute resolution?

If you are interested in pursuing alternative dispute resolution, you may contact the reviewing official to make a request to use ADR for a particular issue or dispute.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-112 

September 28, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022(a) Benefits Guaranteed. Type of Benefits Guaranteed 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letters of September 10, 1976 and September 21, 1976 concerning the * * * Plan (the

"Plan"). You asked, in effect, for a report on the current status of this case. 

The legal issue in this case is whether participants who have completed 15 years of Credited Service and have

attained age 15, but who continued to work for * * * after the date of termination, have a vested benefit under the Plan.

The Plan provides, in its termination of employment provision that "a Participant whose employment with the Firm is

terminated for any reason other than death or retirement after he has completed fifteen (15) years of Credited Service

and has attained age forty-five (45), shall be entitled to receive at normal retirement date if then living, a retirement

benefit equal to his normal retirement benefit computed in accordance with Section V hereof (relating to the amount of

the normal retirement benefit) and based on Credited Service to the date of such termination of employment." 

On August 26, 1976, we requested the Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service to advise us whether

it is their position [*2] that the benefit mentioned in the Plan's termination of employment provision is a nonforfeitable

one under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Recently, we received a response from each of these

agencies. As a result of these responses, we have concluded that a participant who has completed 15 years of Credited

Service and has attained age 45 has a nonforfeitable benefit, i.e., vested benefit, under the Plan, even if he has not

terminated his employment prior to the date of Plan termination. Accordingly, we expect the Pension Benefit Guaranty

Corporation to issue an Amended Notice of Sufficiency shortly. 

We hope this will be of assistance and apologize for the delay in our response. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of Rony D., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 240]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearl, J.), dated April 15, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated January 7, 2005, as supplemented by an order dated February 18, 2005, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of sexual abuse in the second degree (two counts), adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and conditionally discharged him for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated January 7, 2005, as supplemented by the order dated February 18, 2005.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as conditionally discharged the appellant for a period of 12 months is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the period of conditional discharge has expired; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of sexual abuse in the second degree *(see*Penal Law § 130.60 [2]; *Matter of Thomas S.,*26 AD3d 389 [2006]). Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, *802as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see Matter of Thomas S., supra*at 390). Its determination should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see Matter of Thomas S., supra; Matter of Isaac Q.,*217 AD2d 410, 411 [1995]). The Family Court was in the best position to assess the complainant’s credibility *(see Matter of Thomas S., supra).*Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence *(see Matter of Thomas S., supra).*Florio, J.P., Adams, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# C_2006280EN.01001701.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/17

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4356 — Deutsche Bank/Berliner Bank)

(2006/C 280/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 10 November 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Deutsche Bank AG (Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Berliner Bank (Germany) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 10 November 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Deutsche Bank AG (Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Berliner Bank (Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | Deutsche Bank: Banking services worldwide, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

Deutsche Bank: Banking services worldwide,

| — | Berliner Bank: retail banking, including personal and business banking services, mainly in the area of Berlin. |
| --- | --- |

—

Berliner Bank: retail banking, including personal and business banking services, mainly in the area of Berlin.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4356 — Deutsche Bank/Berliner Bank, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4356 — Deutsche Bank/Berliner Bank, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
### §1715b. Rules and regulations

The Secretary is authorized and directed to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title II, §211, as added Feb. 3, 1938, ch. 13, §3, 52 Stat. 23; amended Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title I, §122, 64 Stat. 59; Pub. L. 90–19, §1(a)(3), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 17.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1967—Pub. L. 90–19 substituted "Secretary" for "Commissioner".

1950—Act Apr. 20, 1950, substituted "Commissioner" for "Administrator".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 98–479, title I, §104(f), Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2226, required Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, not later than Oct. 31, 1984, to issue regulations to carry out amendments made to section 1715z–7 of this title by section 436 of Housing and Urban-Rural Recovery Act of 1983, Pub. L. 98–181, title I [titles I–V].
EXHIBIT 31.2 -- Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
                302 of the Sorbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                           CERTIFICATION

I, Ely Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-
Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

   (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
   material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
   particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
   prepared;

   (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
   and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
   quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
   evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
equivalent function):

   (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
   controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
   registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
   controls; and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 3, 2004

/s/ Ely Sakhai
----------------------------------
Ely Sakhai
President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Bureau of Prisons

          - 28 CFR Part 541
          - [Docket No. BOP-1118-F]
          - RIN 1120-AB18

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Prisons, Justice.

# ACTION:

Final rule; delay of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        In this document, the Bureau of Prisons delays the effective date of the final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 8, 2010, (75 FR 76263) and the subsequent correction which appeared in the                               ( print page 11079)    **Federal Register**                         on December 29, 2010 (75 FR 81853). The new effective date for both documents is June 20, 2011.                    

# DATES:

Effective March 1, 2011, the effective date of the final rule published December 8, 2010 (75 FR 76263) and correction document published December 29, 2010 (75 FR 81853) is delayed to June 20, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sarah Qureshi, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 307-2105.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In this document, the Bureau of Prisons delays the effective date of the final rule that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 8, 2010, (75 FR 76263) and the subsequent correction which appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 29, 2010 (75 FR 81853). The new effective date for both documents is June 20, 2011.                

The first document issued a final rule amending the Bureau's Inmate Discipline Program and Special Housing Units (SHU) regulations (28 CFR part 541, subpart A and subpart B), and the second document corrected typographical and numbering errors, but made no substantive changes to the final rule.

Previously, both the final rule and the correction document had an effective date of March 1, 2011. We now delay the effective date of both the final rule and the correction document until June 20, 2011.

Helen Marberry,

Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons.

[FR Doc. 2011-4359 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
§ 515.9 Notice of court-ordered and emergency disclosures. ( a ) *Court-ordered disclosures.* When a record pertaining to an individual is required to be disclosed by a court order, the Privacy Act Officer shall make reasonable efforts to provide notice of this to the individual. Notice shall be given within a reasonable time after the Privacy Act Officer's receipt of the order—except that in a case in which the order is not a matter of public record, the notice shall be given only after the order becomes public. This notice shall be mailed to the individual's last known address and shall contain a copy of the order and a description of the information disclosed. Notice shall not be given if disclosure is made from a criminal law enforcement system of records that has been exempted from the notice requirement.
( b ) *Emergency disclosures.* Upon disclosing a record pertaining to an individual made under compelling circumstances affecting health or safety, the Privacy Act Officer shall, within a reasonable time, notify that individual of the disclosure. This notice shall be mailed to the individual's last known address and shall state the nature of the information disclosed; the person, organization, or agency to which it was disclosed; the date of disclosure; and the compelling circumstances justifying disclosure.
### §901. Art. 101. Improper use of countersign

Any person subject to this chapter who in time of war discloses the parole or countersign to any person not entitled to receive it or who gives to another who is entitled to receive and use the parole or countersign a different parole or countersign from that which, to his knowledge, he was authorized and required to give, shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 70.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 901 | 50:695. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 101), 64 Stat. 137. |