alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Paul Applewhite

Applewhite Aero

PO Box 46955 Seattle, WA 98146

17 September 2015

Subject: Exemption from 14 CFR 91.203 (a) and (b) and 91.9(b) : Extension and Amendment

Applewhite Aero has obtained a Special Airworthiness Certificate for a small UAV

, the Invenio

, in 2013

and need to extend t he exemptions from regulations 14 CFR 91.203 (a) and (b) and 91.9(b)

. Additionally, A pplewhite Aero is requesting an am endment to the exemptions for a n additional aircraft

th e Milo, for which a n experimental airworthiness certificate is in process. As these aircraft are small and incapable of carrying a human, the aircraft s are not suitable for carrying the flight manual, or displaying registrations and airworthiness certificates. These items will be maintained at the ground

station wi th the pilot in command of the UAV.

Applewhite Aero believes the approval of our extension and amend ment to exemption from 14 CFR 91.203 (a) and (b) and 91.9(b) for both aircraft is in the public interest as it supports commerce in the development a nd marketing of UAV technology. It also supports safe and appropriate procedures for integrating UAV technology into the NAS. By maintaining the documents required by 91.9 and 91.203 at the ground control station with the pilot in command, the exemption provides an equivalent level of safety to the or iginal intent of the regulations.

To summarize, Applewhite Aero is requesting an extension and amend ment exemption to 14 CFR 91.203 (a) and (b) and 14 CFR 91.9 (b) to support the operation of small unmanned aircraft registered and certificated by the FAA to operate within the li mitations identified by the FAA in the national airspace.

Respectfully,

Paul G. Applewhite

Applewhite Aero
§ 243.8 What penalties apply to violations of this part? If you are a non-Native transferee of live Alaskan reindeer who violates the provisions of this part, you are subject to the penalties in this section. ( a ) Under 25 U.S.C. 500i, you can be fined up to $7,662 if you: ( 1 ) Take possession of reindeer without a permit issued under § 243.7; or
( 2 ) Do not abide by the terms of a permit issued under § 243.7 (including the requirement that you slaughter or export the reindeer within 30 days and not bring them back alive into Alaska).
( b ) Under 25 U.S.C. 500b, you are barred from asserting your title to the reindeer if you: ( 1 ) Do not obtain a transfer permit from us and fully comply with its terms; or
( 2 ) Fail to file with us a claim of title to reindeer within 30 days of acquiring them.
[71 FR 2429, Jan. 13, 2006, as amended at 81 FR 42482, June 30, 2016; 82 FR 7653, Jan. 23, 2017; 83 FR 5195, Feb. 6, 2018; 84 FR 15102, Apr. 15, 2019; 85 FR 9369, Feb. 19, 2020; 86 FR 7348, Jan. 28, 2021; 87 FR 13156, Mar. 9, 2022; 88 FR 13022, Mar. 2, 2023; 89 FR 18363, Mar. 13, 2024]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Depression and college students**
 
2011 | 2012 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.8102:D 44/30/
Item Number:0507-B-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000862539
 
January 12, 2018
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2012- 001/ 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED 

DOCKETOST- f Z - 12£1 7/ ACTION DATE~ (~ 2-ot-z_._ 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunity is subject, where applic-able, 

to conditions previously imposed. 

This action iS effective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is undertaken on the Department's own motion. 

In v,iew of the agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

the above ocedure, th 1-d Q 'odin 14 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President ...,... North America 

International Air Transport Association 

1776 K.St. N.W. #12th Floor 

Washington DC 20006
#### FULLER v. COPELAND FABRICS

No. 15P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 512

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1990.
H. Res. 523

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 14, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (S. 761) to regulate interstate commerce by electronic

means by permitting and encouraging the continued expansion of electronic commerce through the operation of free

market forces, and other purposes. All points of order against

the conference report and against its consideration are

waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### In the Matter of Angela Willis, Petitioner, v Raymond Kelly, as Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, et al., Respondents.

[826 NYS2d 204]

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated May 31, 2004, dismissing petitioner from her position as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Doris Ling-Cohan, J.], entered July 5, 2005) dismissed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner, inter alia, gave evasive answers and failed promptly to identify herself as a police officer on May 13, 2000, was unfit for duty due to intoxication on December 22, 2000, made false statements during the subsequent internal investigation, and provided a forged doctor’s note was supported by substantial evidence. The Assistant Dep*358uty Commissioner-Trials, who heard and saw the witnesses, was in the best position to judge their credibility *(see e.g. Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70*NY2d 436, 443 [1987]). The penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience *(see e.g. Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept.,*96 NY2d 892 [2001]).

While petitioner’s pursuit of her prior successful article 78 proceeding *(Matter of Willis v New York City Police Dept.,*214 AD2d 428 [1995]) constitutes conduct protected by the First Amendment *(see Matter of Buric v Safir,*285 AD2d 255, 265 [2002], *lv dismissed*98 NY2d 688 [2002]), we do not find a viable issue as to whether such conduct was a substantial or motivating factor in the decision to bring the latest charges against petitioner, such as might warrant a hearing. Concur— Buckley, EJ., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

South Korea’s largest air exercise proves ‘Accept Follow-on Forces’ missionApril 22, 2024 — A crucial aspect of any exercise for the 8th Fighter Wing is the reception of forces, and that was no different as the Wolf Pack hosts the largest air exercise in the Republic of Korea... MORE 

----

USAF, ROKAF join forces for Herk Guardians 23October 20, 2023 — United States Air Force representatives from Yokota Air Base, Japan, met Republic of Korea Air Force counterparts at Gimhae Air Base, South Korea, for a week of tactical airlift training and cultural exchange as part of Herk Guardians 23, Oct. 9–13... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# C_2006310EN.01003001.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/30

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 October 2006 — Pierik-Bomers v Commission

(Case T-316/99) (1)

1

(2006/C 310/64)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 4.3.2000.

1

---
# Instructions

 Additional information or attachment  Required to describe this situation

When Data is entered and the Cell is highlighted with a blue background and a black font, additional information is needed to describe the situation.You can use fields to the right if it's related to a missing distributee being a beneficiary or a portion of the benefit attributable to non-US source income. You will need to include an attachment if it's related to Prior Payments or Employee Contributions.
https://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/form-mp300-instructions.pdf

# Schedule A

# Schedule B

Additional information or attachment Required to describe this situation

# Removed via Amendment

# image1.emf
**EXHIBIT 31(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Leo H.Suggs, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 of Overnite Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section III.E.] 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 8, 2004
### **CHAPTER 36—DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS DEREGULATION AND FINANCIAL REGULATION SIMPLIFICATION**
### [§2330a. Renumbered §4505]
**Exhibit 3.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION**

** **

**OF**

** **

**AMERICAN HONDA RECEIVABLES LLC**

 

This Certificate of Formationof American Honda Receivables LLC(the “**Company**”),dated as of March 16, 2011, is duly executed and filed to form a limited liability company in accordance with the Delaware LimitedLiability Company Act (6 Del. C. §18-201, et seq.).

 

1.        Name.The name of the limited liability company is American Honda Receivables LLC.

 

2.        RegisteredOffice.    The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street,in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

3.        RegisteredAgent.    The name and address of its registered agent for service of process in the State of Delaware is The Corporation TrustCompany, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

** **

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of American Honda Receivables LLC as of the 16th day of March, 2011.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-1 

January 5, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4048 Date of Termination 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of December 3, 1975, requesting an opinion as to whether the * * * Retirement

Pension Plan (hereinafter the "Plan") terminated prior to the effective date of Title IV of the Employee Retirement

Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter the "Act"). 

Your letter stated that for Plan years 1970 and 1971 contributions as required under the Plan were made by the

employer to purchase life insurance policies and to the auxiliary fund. Thereafter, the employer has paid the annual life

insurance premiums directly to the insurance company instead of through the trustees of the Plan and has not made

contributions to the auxiliary fund. Your letter further cited Section 15.3 of the Plan, which provides: "Plan shall

terminate in the event Company does not make contributions sufficient to permit continuance of Plan in accordance with

Section 13 . . . ." 

After a careful review of your letter and the Plan documents you subsequently sent, it is our opinion that the Plan

did not terminate for purposes of Title IV of the Act prior to September 2, 1974, the effective date of the Act. 

Section 15.3 of the Plan does not apply to terminate the [*2] plan prior to the effective date of the Act as a result

of the failure of the employer to make contributions to the auxiliary fund. This contingency is specifically covered in

Section 13.3 of the Plan, so that clearly the Plan continued in accordance with Section 13. 

Moreover, it is our view that it was intended that the Plan continue to date. We find no evidence of any formal

action undertaken to terminate the Plan nor any communication to participants of the Plan expressing an intent to

terminate the Plan. To the contrary, the employer has continued the requisite life insurance premium payments and

apparently participants have continued to accrue retirement benefits provided in Section 5 of the Plan to date. 

Please advise us if you should have any further questions. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

To Whom ItMay Concern:

Please find enclosed for your review and comment the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for designation ofan Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) offshore Jacksonville, Florida. This document is being circulated to agencies and the public for a 45-day commentperiod.

The DEIS was prepared bythe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers (USACE) Jacksonville District. The DEIS provides the information necessary to evaluate the need for and alternatives to the designation ofa new ODMDS or expansion of the existing Jacksonville ODMDS pursuant to Section 102 ofthe Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, as amended. The DEIS identifies two preferred alternatives. Alternative 1 consists ofexpansion ofthe existing ODMDS to the south and east. Alternative 2 consists ofdesignation ofa new ODMDS south ofthe existing ODMDS. A final preferred alternative will be selected in the Final EIS based on agency and public input. The purpose ofthe ODMDS is to accommodate disposal of dredged material generated over the next 50 years from the Jacksonville HarborNavigation Project, Naval Station Mayport and the proposed Jacksonville Harbor Deepening Project. All dredged material must meet the environmental criteria established inthe EPA's Ocean DumpingRegulations. The DEIS contains a draft Site Management and Monitoring Plans (Appendix F) for each alternative site. In addition, the DEIS contains a Biological Assessment (Appendix C) in accordance with Section 7 ofthe Endangered Species Act and an Essential Fish Habitat Assessment (Appendix D) in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

Comments onthe DEIS (includingthe draft SMMP) mustbereceived bythe EPA at the address below by or45 days after publication ofthe Notice ofAvailability in the Federal Register.

U.S. EPA, Region 4 ATTN: Ms. Jennifer S. Derby, Chief Wetlands and Marine Regulatory Section SamNunnAtlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 derby.jennifer@epa.gov

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed wrth Vegetable on Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)Ifyou have any questions orneed additional information please contact 

### Mr. Christopher McArthur at (404) 562-9391 ormcarthur.chri stopher@epa.gov. 

# f

Enclosure Sincerely,

# /J~?f2L. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator
#### Burlison *v.*Carl et al.

[No. 12,279.

Filed October 16, 1925.]

1. *Appeal.—Objection must, be made and exception taken at time of court!s ruling to present any question for*review.—To present any error for review on appeal, the record must show that an objection was made and exception taken at the time of the court’s ruling, p. 514.

2. *Assignments.—Assignment by plaintiff of all his interest in contract precludes his maintaining action*thereon.—A party to a contract that had assigned all his interest therein to another cannot maintain an action thereon, and, if he attempts to do so, judgment is properly rendered for the defendant, p. 515.

From Vanderburgh Probate Court; *Elmer Q. Loch-year,*Judge.

Action by Mittie Burlison against Henry W. Carl and another. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*Oscar Birch*and *Benjamin E. Zieg,*for appellant.

*Spencer, Ensle & Spencer,*for appellees.

Nichols, P. J.

1. Action by appellant, against appellees, to recover money as damages on account of the breach of a certain written contract for the sale of real estate entered into between appellant and appellees and to recover money paid by appellant to appellees on said written contract. Appellees answered in denial and, at the trial, introduced in evidence a written assignment of the contract for the breach of which appellant sued. There was no objection to reading this assignment in evidence because it was not within the issue. It does not appear by the statement of the record that there was any objection or exception to its admission, until the motion for a new trial was filed. No question, therefore, is presented as to the court’s ruling in admitting such evidence, and for the *515same reason in admitting any other evidence. The record must show the objections made and exceptions taken at the time of the court’s ruling on the offered evidence. *Chicago, etc., R. Co.*v. *Ader*(1915), 184 Ind. 235, 239, 110 N. E. 67; *American Fidelity Co.v. Indianapolis, etc., Fuel Co.*(1912), 178 Ind. 133, 98 N. E. 709; *Adolph Kempner Co.*v. *Citizens Bank, etc.*(1917), 64 Ind. App. 632, 116 N. E. 440.

2. It appears by this assignment that appellant had, before she commenced her action, assigned all of her interest in the contract to her husband. Thereafter, she had no right of action, and judgment was properly rendered against her. The court did not err in its decision.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 99.6




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Crescent Point Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Saxberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:           March 11, 2015                                              CRESCENT POINT ENERGY CORP.




/s/ Scott Saxberg


Name:  Scott Saxberg


Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.220 Does it make a difference whether the claim is large or small? Yes. The Contract Disputes Act requires that an Indian tribe or tribal organization making a claim for more than $100,000 shall certify that: ( a ) The claim is made in good faith,
( b ) Supporting documents or data are accurate and complete to the best of the Indian tribe or tribal organization's knowledge and belief;
( c ) The amount claimed accurately reflects the amount believed to be owed by the Federal government; and
( d ) The person making the certification is authorized to do so on behalf of the Indian tribe or tribal organization.