alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 513.33 Will the Commission issue a certification when the Commission is the creditor agency?

Yes. Upon completion of the procedures established in this subpart and pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 5514, the Commission will submit a certification to Treasury or to a paying agency in the form prescribed by the paying agency.
#### § 39.402 What definitions apply to terms used in this subpart?

*Administrative officials* means any persons responsible for managing and operating a school, including the school supervisor, the chief school administrator, tribal officials, Education Line Officers, and the Director, OIEP.

*Director* means the Director of the Office of Indian Education Programs of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

*Education Line Officer* means the Bureau official in charge of Bureau education programs and functions in an Agency who reports to the Director.
#### Mariam Sivin, Respondent, v. Charles O. Seaman, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
#### Illinois Central Railroad Company *v.*Cobb, Christy *&*Co.

1. Pleading and *evidence—in action against a carrier for delay in transportation of goods.*In a suit against a carrier to recover damages for non-delivery of goods in proper time, if the action be brought on bills of lading, none will be admissible in evidence on the trial except those set out in the declaration.

2. But where the action was case, brought by the owner of the property, who was neither consignor nor consignee, and he described the property shipped, not by reference to bills of lading, but as a certain number of bushels of grain, it was held that the fact that a bill of lading was made out for each car in which the grain was shipped did not confine the plaintiff to proof of only one car under each count. He could prove the entire shipment as one transaction, though made partly on one day and partly on another.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding.

This was another of the series of cases between the saíne parties, and is of the same general character as that reported *.ante,*p. 128.

Messrs. Hay, Greene *&*Littler, and Messrs. Williams & Burr, for the appellant.

Mr. Hamilton Spencer, and Messrs. Weldon & Benjamin, and Mr. T. D. Lincoln, for the appellees.

Mr. Chief Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The only point made in this case not considered in the opinion filed in the other cases between these same parties is, that the plaintiff should not have been permitted to introduce *149evidence of more than two bills of lading under the two counts in the declaration. If the action had been brought on bills of lading, none would have been admissible on the trial except those set out in the declaration. But this is an action on the case brought by the owners of the property, who are neither consignors nor consignees, and they describe the corn shipped, not by reference to bills of lading, but as 17,000 bushels of corn, shipped at Bloomington, on the 6th of April, by E. Fay & Co., as agents of the plaintiffs.

The fact that a bill of lading was made out for each car did not confine the plaintiffs to proof of only two cars. They could prove the entire shipment by Fay *&*Co. as one transaction, though made partly on one day and partly on another.

There was no error in the admission of this evidence, but for the reasons given in the other cases, some of which apply in this, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed!*
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table For 2024 Valuation Dates 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table for 2024 Valuation Dates

This mortality table is used to determine the present value of annuities in involuntary terminations and distress terminations of single-employer plans, as discussed in 29 CFR 4044. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

 

##  

December 6, 2023

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
# C_2006331EN.01000101.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/1

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 December 2006 — Federal Republic of Germany v European Parliament and Council of the European Union

(Case C-380/03) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Approximation of laws - Directive 2003/33/EC - Advertising and sponsorship in respect of tobacco products - Annulment of Articles 3 and 4 - Choice of legal basis - Articles 95 EC and 152 EC - Principle of proportionality)

(2006/C 331/01)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma, W.-D. Plessing and C.-D. Quassowski, acting as Agents, and J. Sedemund, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: R. Passos, E. Waldherr and U. Rösslein, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Karlsson and J.-P. Hix, acting as Agents)

Defendants:

Interveners in support of the defendants: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Fraguas Gadea and M. Rodríguez Cárcamo, acting as Agents), Republic of Finland (represented by: A. Guimaraes-Purokoski and E. Bygglin, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and R. Loosli-Surrans, acting as Agents), Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M.-J. Jonczy, L. Pignataro-Nolin and F. Hoffmeister, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendants:

Re:

Annulment of Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 2003/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products (OJ 2003 L 152, p. 16) — Legal basis (Article 95 EC) — Attainment of the objective of the establishment of the internal market by prohibition of that activity — Scope of the prohibition on any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States for the purposes of protecting human health (Article 152 EC)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Commission of the European Communities each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Commission of the European Communities each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 275, 15.11.2003.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF


                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)





     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:


     The Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





         Dated: May 5, 2005             /S/ Yaron Meerfeld
                                        ------------------
                                        Yaron Meerfeld, Chief Executive Officer








         Dated: May 5, 2005             /S/ Eyal Bigon
                                        ---------------
                                        Eyal Bigon, Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BARROW v. MURPHREY

No. 500P89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 738

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-51 

April 13, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4062(c) Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans. Determination of Employer Net Worth 

OPINION: 

 You have requested * * * of my staff for a letter indicating the amount of employer liability, pursuant to § 4062

of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"), imposed on * * * and its wholly-owned subsidiary

* * * as a result of the termination of the Retirement Plan for Bargaining Employees of * * * (the "Plan"). The Plan's

termination notice, proposing a termination date of January 15, 1976, was received by this Corporation on December

29, 1975. In connection with your request, you and * * * have submitted to * * * a case officer in this Corporation's

Office of Program Operations, various financial statements and other documents relating to the purchase by you and your

associate of all of * * * outstanding stook. 

* * * employer liability under § 4062(b) of the Act is limited to 30 percent of its net worth, determined as of a day

chosen by this Corporation but not more than 120 days prior to the date of the Plan's termination. Employer net worth

is determined under § 4062(c) of the Act on whatever basis, in the opinion of this Corporation, best reflects the current

[*2] status of the employer's operations and prospects at the time chosen for determining the net worth. 

In reviewing * * * potential employer liability, we have considered the documents submitted to * * * including *

* * unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of June 28, 1975, * * * unaudited consolidated statement of operations for

the eight month period ending June 28, 1975, the * * * unaudited balance sheet as of November 29, 1975 and various

agreements under which you and your associate agreed to purchase for $15,000.00 all of Relief's outstanding stock. As

a result of this review, we have determined that * * * net worth, for purposes of $4062 of the Act, is $15,000.00. 

Consequently, contingent upon our own or other independent audit of the financial condition of * * * employer

liability to this Corporation pursuant to § 4062 of the Act would be limited to $4,500.00. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
§ 81.24 What information must be included on the Secretarial election notice? The Secretarial election notice must contain all of the following items. ( a ) The date of the Secretarial election;
( b ) The date which registration forms must be received by the Secretarial Election Board;
( c ) A description of the purpose of the Secretarial election;
( d ) A description of the statutory and tribal authority under which the Secretarial election is held;
( e ) The deadline for filing challenges to the Registered Voters List;
( f ) If polling sites are to be used, the date an absentee ballot request must be received by the Secretarial Election Board;
( g ) A statement as to whether the Secretarial election is being held entirely by mailout ballot or with polling sites, in accordance with the tribe's governing document's amendment or adoption articles; and
( h ) The locations and hours of established polling sites, if any.
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 28, 2015

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-2 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName:

Lionel AntunesTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2015




---

<for SEMT 2012-2>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
March 29, 2012 (the Agreement).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### [§9805. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–533, §1(7)(A), June 29, 1960, 74 Stat. 246]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 592, related to reports to Congress with respect to claims under sections 9802, 9803, and 9804 of this title.
Page 1 of 1 

FW: SJV 8-Hour Non-Monitored Area Analysis 

Magliano, Karen@ARB 

Doris Lo, Frances Wicher 

08/12/2011 02: 10 PM 

Hide Details 

From: "Magliano, Karen@ARBM <krnaglian@arb.ca.gov> 

To: Doris Lo/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Frances Wicher/R9/USEPAIUS@EPA 

1 Attachment 

FYI 

From: DaMassa, John@ARB 

Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:20 PM 

To: Lakin.Matthew@eparnalI.epa.gov 

Subject: SJV 8-Hour Non-Monitored Area Analysis 

Hi, Matt. I'm sending you the non-monitored area analysis for the SJV's 8-hour ozone SIP to get your 

review process started. We will send a hard copy and letter first thing next week. Take care. 

- John 

file://C:\Documents and Settings\fwicher\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\-web3326.h ... 911 3/20 1 1 

..... &." ..... "-" .---..... - -....- -,-...--- ". --..,--. . .. ". .. . . --.. ..&. .~. . . ..--- --.. . ~
# C_2006321EN.01000201.xml

| 29.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 December 2006

(2006/C 321/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3173 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4573 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0463 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6058 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 93,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2375 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5782 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,540 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,92 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6972 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8305 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3980 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,561 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8648 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6699 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5268 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2387 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8731 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0209 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 224,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2590 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2935 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3495 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 905,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6534 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,679 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6940 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,252 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3173

JPY

Japanese yen

156,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4573

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67115

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0463

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6058

ISK

Iceland króna

93,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2375

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5782

CZK

Czech koruna

27,540

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,92

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6972

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8305

RON

Romanian leu

3,3980

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,561

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8648

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6699

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5268

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2387

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8731

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0209

KRW

South Korean won

1 224,69

ZAR

South African rand

9,2590

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2935

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3495

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 905,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6534

PHP

Philippine peso

64,679

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6940

THB

Thai baht

47,252

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 700.291 Petitions for amendment: Time limits for processing. ( a ) *Acknowledgement of receipt.* The acknowledgement of receipt of a petition required by § 700.289(c) shall be dispatched not later than ten (10) days (Saturdays, Sundays and public legal holidays excepted) after receipt of the petition by the system manager responsible for the system containing the challenged record, unless a decision on the petition has been previously dispatched.
( b ) *Decision on petition.* A petition for amendment shall be processed promptly. A determination whether to accept or reject the petitioned for amendment shall be made within no more than thirty (30) days (Saturdays, Sundays, and public legal holidays excepted) after receipt of the petition by the system manager responsible for the system containing the challenged record.
( c ) *Suspension of time limit.* The thirty (30) day time limit for a decision on a petition shall be suspended if it is necessary to notify the petitioner, pursuant to § 700.289(d) that additional information in support of the petition is required. Running of the thirty (30) day time limit shall resume on receipt of the additional information by the system manager responsible for the system containing the challenged record.
( d ) *Extensions of time.* ( 1 ) The thirty (30) day time limit for a decision on a petition may be extended if the official responsible for making a decision on the petition determines that an extension is necessary for one of the following reasons: ( i ) A decision on the petition requires analysis of voluminous record or records;
( ii ) Some or all of the challenged records must be collected from facilities other than the facility at which the official responsible for making the decision is located.
( 2 ) If the official responsible for making a decision on the petition determines that an extension is necessary, he shall promptly inform the petitioner of the extension and the date on which a decision is expected to be dispatched.
### Interest Rates
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the registrant.



Date: May 10, 2005



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/    JOHN J. LEGERE                 
|John J. Legere Chief Executive Officer
120 STAT. 2916 PUBLIC LAW 109–429—DEC. 20, 2006

Public Law 109–429

109th Congress

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study to

determine the suitability and feasibility of including in the National Park System

certain sites in Monroe County, Michigan, relating to the Battles of the River

Raisin during the War of 1812.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘River Raisin National Battlefield

Study Act’’.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY, MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN,

SITES RELATING TO BATTLES OF THE RIVER RAISIN.

(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special resource study of sites in Monroe County, Michigan,

relating to the Battles of the River Raisin on January 18 and

22, 1813, and their aftermath to determine—

(1) the national significance of the sites; and

(2) the suitability and feasibility of including the sites

in the National Park System.

(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The study conducted under subsection (a)

shall include the analysis and recommendations of the Secretary

on—

(1) the effect on Monroe County, Michigan, of including

the sites in the National Park System; and

(2) whether the sites could be included in an existing

unit of the National Park System.

(c) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study under subsection

(a), the Secretary shall consult with—

(1) appropriate Federal agencies and State and local

government entities; and

(2) interested groups and organizations.

(d) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under subsection

(a) shall be conducted in accordance with Public Law 91–383 (16

U.S.C. 1a–1 et seq.).

(e) REPORT.—Not later than three years after the date on

which funds are first made available for the study, the Secretary

shall submit to the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

of the Senate a report containing—

River Raisin

National

Battlefield

Study Act.

Dec. 20, 2006

[H.R. 5132]

PUBLIC LAW 109–429—DEC. 20, 2006 120 STAT. 2917

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5132:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–637 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 25, considered and passed House.

Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

(1) the findings of the study; and

(2) any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.

Approved December 20, 2006.