alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-90 

July 9, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4044 Allocation of Assets 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter asking what distribution options must be offered to participants upon the

termination of the * * * Retirement Plan (the "Plan"). 

As I understand the pertinent facts, * * * (the "Company") has adopted an amendment to the Plan which changes

it to a profit-sharing plan. Because the adoption of such a plan amendment constitutes a termination under section

4041(f) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"), a termination notice was submitted to the

PBGC. The Plan has sufficient assets to pay at least all non-forfeitable benefits under the Plan. The Company does not

want to offer each participant the option of receiving a paid-up annuity or a lump-sum payment. Rather, the Company

intends to amend the profit-sharing plan, effective April 1, 1976, to provide for the transfer of all of the Plan assets into

the profit-sharing trust, with each participant's benefit under the Plan segregated into an annuity contract or a fixed

income account. 

The allocation requirements of section 4044 are complied with in a situation wherein there is a proposed transfer

of the assets of a covered plan to an individual [*2] account plan, (such as a profit-sharing plan), if each participant is

given the option of receiving the allocable share of the plan assets to which he or she is entitled as a paid-up annuity or,

if provided for in the plan, in a lump-sum payment, instead of having those assets transferred to the individual account

plan. Accordingly, the Company's prospective amendment will not satisfy the allocation requirements of section 4044.

Additionally, in order to insure that the rights and/or obligations of Plan participants and the PBGC have been clearly

delineated, prior to the distribution of the Plan assets, the plan administrator should have each participant complete an

Election and Release Form. ("form") 

We do not have a standard form. However, we will accept such a form, prepared by you, if it includes the following

information, stated in easily understandable language: The available election options; the amount of each; the value of

the benefits attributable to the amount of any assets transferred to the profit-sharing trust (or any lump-sum payment) is

not guaranteed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. In addition, the form should contain a release of the PBGC

of any [*3] and all liability to pay guaranteed benefits under the Plan which should be completed only by participants

electing any form of distribution other than the purchase of a fully paid-up annuity. The form must be executed

individually by each participant and submitted to the PBGC. 

We trust this answers your inquiry. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Liu, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ David LiuDavid
      Liu
                Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
August 9, 2010
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-15 

November 13, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(a) Plans Covered. Requirements of Coverage 

OPINION: 

 Your letter of October 7, 1974, was referred to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation by the Minneapolis,

Minnesota, area office of the Labor-Management Services Administration. 

In general you wished to know whether a plan which has been ruled by the Internal Revenue Service to be tax

qualified, and which provides a participant at age 65 with a retirement benefit equal to 15 percent of his highest 3 years

average annual wage is covered by the plan termination insurance program established by the Employee Retirement

Income Security Act of 1974. 

Section 4021 of the Act provides mandatory coverage of defined benefit pension plans which have been ruled to

be tax qualified by the Internal Revenue Service. Therefore, the plan described in your letter is covered by the plan

termination insurance program. 

We hope this will be of assistance and apologize for the delay in our response. 

Steven E. Schanes 

Acting Executive Director
#### § 559.4 What must a tribe submit to the Chair with the copy of each facility license that has been issued or renewed?

A tribe shall submit to the Chair with each facility license an attestation certifying that by issuing the facility license, the tribe has determined that the construction and maintenance of the gaming facility, and the operation of that gaming, is conducted in a manner which adequately protects the environment and the public health and safety. This means that a tribe has identified and enforces laws, resolutions, codes, policies, standards or procedures applicable to each gaming place, facility, or location that protect the environment and the public health and safety, including standards, under a tribal-state compact or Secretarial procedures.

[77 FR 58772, Sept. 24, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 31995, June 5, 2015]
H. Res. 671

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

December 8, 2000.

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the HONORABLE JULIAN C. DIXON, a

Representative from the State of California.

Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the

House as the Speaker may designate, together with such

Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed to attend the funeral.

Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be

authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolutions and

that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid

out of applicable accounts of the House.

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of

the deceased.
2

•HRES 671 EH

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased.

Attest:

Clerk.
----

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |
| 001-10315                | 63-0860407 |
| (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|                     |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| 10.1   | Additional Tranche Term Loan Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2014, among HealthSouth Corporation, its subsidiary guarantors, the lenders party thereto, and Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent. |
|   |   |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   |   |   |
| By:    | /S/   JOHN P. WHITTINGTON |
|   | Name: | John P. Whittington |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President, General Counseland Corporate Secretary |
# C_2006179EN.01001202.xml

| 1.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4278 — PAI Partners SAS/AMEC SPIE SA)

(2006/C 179/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4278. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4278. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
Document

Exhibit 10.12

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


    THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of November 15, 2021, is made by and between TransDigm Group Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Sarah Wynne (“Executive”).  


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) setting forth certain terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company; and


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the respective covenants and agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows: 


1.Amendments. Section 6(b)(iii) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and restated in its entirety as follows:


(iii) 18.0 times the difference of (A) the Monthly COBRA Continuation Coverage Rate determined as of the Date of Termination for the Executive’s applicable health plan coverage as in effect on such date, less (B) the monthly cost to Executive that is being charged for such coverage as of the Date of Termination.  
2.    Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
3.    Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed, construed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of Ohio. 
4.    Full Force and Effect.  Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and unmodified hereby.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date and year first above written. 


									
			
	TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED
		
	By:		/s/ Kevin Stein
	Name:		Kevin Stein
	Title:		Chief Executive Officer
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	/s/ Sarah Wynne
	Sarah Wynne
Exhibit 32.2 BILLMYPARENTS, INC. (formerly known as SOCIALWISE, INC.) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Socialwise, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jonathan Shultz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |                        
|                      |  |                        
|Date:  August 8, 2011 |  | /s/ Jonathan Shultz    
|                      |  | Jonathan Shultz        
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD11-6-000]


Priorities for Addressing Risks to the Reliability of the Bulk-
Power System; Notice Establishing Date for Comments

    On February 8, 2011, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
convened a Commissioner-led technical conference regarding priorities 
for addressing risks to the reliability of the Bulk-Power System, as 
previously announced.\1\ Any entity or person wishing to submit written 
comments regarding the matters discussed at that technical conference 
should submit such comments in this docket, AD11-6-000, on or before 
March 21, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Notice of Technical Conference re Priorities for Addressing 
Risks to the Reliability of the Bulk-Power System, 76 FR 2369 
(January 13, 2011), as supplemented by the Reliability Technical 
Conference Agenda issued January 7, 2011.

    Dated: February 17, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4262 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### §1515. Application for recognition

(a) A foreign representative applies to the court for recognition of a foreign proceeding in which the foreign representative has been appointed by filing a petition for recognition.

(b) A petition for recognition shall be accompanied by—

(1) a certified copy of the decision commencing such foreign proceeding and appointing the foreign representative;

(2) a certificate from the foreign court affirming the existence of such foreign proceeding and of the appointment of the foreign representative; or

(3) in the absence of evidence referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2), any other evidence acceptable to the court of the existence of such foreign proceeding and of the appointment of the foreign representative.

(c) A petition for recognition shall also be accompanied by a statement identifying all foreign proceedings with respect to the debtor that are known to the foreign representative.

(d) The documents referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) shall be translated into English. The court may require a translation into English of additional documents.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 139.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
#### John P. Cohalan, Respondent, v. New York Press Company (Limited), Appellant.

Judgment affirmed,, with costs, with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and answer on payment of costs. No opinion.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed June 6, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-150

Lower Tribunal No. 15-17377

________________

Gian Franco Martinez, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Juan Fernandez-Uriate,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Bernard S.

Shapiro, Judge.

Hasbun & Mendoza, PLLC, and Maribel Mendoza, for appellant.

Perez-Abreu & Martin-Lavielle, P.A., Andy W. Acosta and Javier PerezAbreu, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

Gian Franco Martinez (“Appellant”), as personal representative of the estate

of Helen Doris Fernandez (the deceased former “Wife”), appeals the lower court’s
December 14, 2016 order of dismissal for lack of prosecution and the trial court’s

determination that the Wife’s counsel failed to timely move for a substitution of

party in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.260(a)(1). On July 10,

2015, the Wife filed a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage and Other Relief

Without Dependent or Minor Children. On October 5, 2015, the Wife passed away. 

 On October 10, 2016, Juan Fernandez-Uriate (“Appellee” and the former

husband) filed a Notice of Lack of Prosecution. On November 16, 2016, the

Wife’s counsel simultaneously filed a suggestion of death and a motion for

substitution of party seeking to substitute Appellant in her stead. The lower court

entered its dismissal order on December 15, 2016. This appeal followed.

Appellant argues the trial court erred in dismissing the cause. We agree and

reverse.

First, the lower court erred in dismissing the cause for failure to timely move

for substitution. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.260(a)(1) provides a 90-day

period for filing a motion for substitution, after a suggestion of death is both filed

on the record and served pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516. 

Feller v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 3D16-2389, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D392, *3

(Fla. 3d DCA February 14, 2018) (internal citations omitted). Here, the suggestion

of death and motion for substitution were filed and served on the same day, and

thus the motion for substitution was filed within the applicable 90-day period. 

2
Therefore, there can be no dispute that the motion for substitution was timely filed

and rule 1.260(a)(1) cannot be a basis for dismissal. 

Second, the lower court erred in dismissing the cause for lack of

prosecution. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) provides that after a

compliant service of notice of no record activity, if “no record activity occurs

within the 60 days immediately following the service of such notice, and if no stay

was issued . . . the action shall be dismissed.” Here, record activity occurred

within the 60 days immediately following the service of the Notice of Lack of

Prosecution. Therefore, rule 1.420(e) cannot be a basis for dismissal.

For the foregoing reasons, the lower court’s December 15, 2016 dismissal

order is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

3
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Research Centers in Trauma, Burn 
and Perioperative Injury.
    Date: March 17, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Room 3AN12B, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3907, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a7a636168784a676b636624646362246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="03736a686171436e626a6f2d6d6a6b2d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority 
Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics 
Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry 
Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, 
Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority 
Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 15, 2011.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4016 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Attachment A

Recommended Designations for the 2010 One

- Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS

Based on 2014 design values, all regulatory SO 2 monitors in Texas are below the 2010 one

- hour

NAAQS of 75 parts per billion (ppb). Based on these design values, t h e recommended designation for

e

ach of the 11 count ies listed below is attainment . The recommended designation for each of the

remaining 243 counties in Texas is unclassifiable/attainment

.

County Number of SO 2 Regulatory

Monitors 2012 SO 2

Design Value

(ppb) 2013 SO 2

Design Value

(ppb) 2014 SO 2

Design Value*

(ppb)

Dallas 1 7 6 5

El Paso 2 10 7 10

Ellis 3 14 14 13

Galveston 1 26 16 12

Gregg 1 56 52 50

Harris 7 38 31 24

Jefferson 2 51 29 26

Kaufman 1 13 13 14

McLennan 1 6 6 6

Navarro 1 40 38 35

Nueces 3 25 12 7

* 201 4 design values are as of 7

- 20

- 15

.

All data obtained from EPA’s AQS database.