alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-16 

May 20, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043. Reportable Events

29 CFR 2617 (now 29 CFR 2615). Reporting and Notification Requirements for Reportable Events 

OPINION: 

 The newly appointed Executive Director of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC"), Edwin M. Jones,

has referred to me your letter concerning PBGC News Release No. 82-14. You question whether reportable events must

be reported to PBGC if the 30 day reporting requirement under Section 4043 of the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), as amended, has been waived. This question is significant because the News Release

stated that revised Form 5500 no longer provides for the recording of reportable events. 

Revised Form 5500 was issued in anticipation of the revision of PBGC's "Reportable Events" regulation, 29 C.F.R.

Part 2615, a process that is currently underway. However, the regulation was not completed in time for concurrent

issuance with the revised Form 5500. Since the revised regulation will reduce the paperwork burden of plan

administrator, PBGC determined that it was appropriate to implement the policy underlying the regulation prior to its

issuance. 

Thus, as stated in the News Release, a plan administrator must still notify PBGC, [*2] in accordance with 29 C.F.R.

§ 2615.3, of those reportable events for which the 30 day notice requirement is not waived. However, with respect to

those reportable events for which the 30 day notice requirement is waived, PBGC does not require any notification. We

realize that 29 C.F.R. § 2615.4 in its present from does not embody the current policy. The revised Reportable Events

regulation, which will reflect the policy that has now been implemented, will be issued in the near future. 

I trust that this is responsive to your inquiry. 

Mitchell L. Strickler 

Deputy General Counsel
§ 273.130 What is required in the contract proposal for funding? A contract proposal must be in writing and contain the following: ( a ) Name, address, and telephone number of the proposed contractor;
( b ) Name, address, and telephone number of the Tribe(s) to be served by the contract;
( c ) Descriptive narrative of the contract proposal;
( d ) The education plan approved by the Indian Education Committee;
( e ) A separate budget outlining the Johnson-O'Malley funds for operational support and/or supplemental programs, by line item, to facilitate accountability;
( f ) A clear identification of what educational needs the Johnson-O'Malley funds requested for operational support will address; and
( g ) Documentation of the requirements for operational support in § 273.126(b)(1).
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 589

Congratulating Nancy Johnson on winning the first gold medal of the 2000

Olympic games in Sydney, Australia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 22, 2000

Mrs. BIGGERT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Congratulating Nancy Johnson on winning the first gold

medal of the 2000 Olympic games in Sydney, Australia.

Whereas Nancy Johnson, a native of Downers Grove, Illinois,

captured the first gold medal of the 2000 summer Olympic games in Sydney, Australia, by winning the women’s

10 meter air rifle competition;

Whereas Nancy Johnson’s victory was the culmination of

years of hard work, dedication, and participation in international competition, including the 1996 Olympic games

in Atlanta, the 1999 Pan American Games, and the 1998

World Championships;

Whereas Nancy Johnson’s Olympic performance and shooting

achievements have raised the level of awareness and appreciation for women’s sports throughout the United

States and the world;
2

•HRES 589 IH

Whereas Nancy Johnson’s gold-medal-winning performance

epitomizes the goals and ideals of the Olympics, which include a commitment to excellence, grace under pressure,

and good will toward fellow competitors; and

Whereas Nancy Johnson has honored the Nation through her

dedication to excellence and high achievement: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates Nancy Johnson on capturing

3 the first gold medal of the 2000 summer Olympic

4 games in Sydney, Australia, by winning the women’s

5 10 meter air rifle competition; and

6 (2) recognizes the important contribution

7 Nancy Johnson’s achievement has made to the

8 United States Olympic effort and to the advance9 ment of women’s sports.

Æ
### [§§4063 to 4065. Omitted]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

As enacted, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1842(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4244, originally transferred sections 2361a, 2358b, and 2374a of this title to sections 4063 to 4065, respectively, to become effective Jan. 1, 2022. Subsequently, Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(q)(1), (u)(3)(B), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2148, 2152, amended section 1842(b) of Pub. L. 116–283, effective as if included therein, so as to eliminate those transfers, thereby omitting these sections before they took effect. Other amendments by Pub. L. 117–81 resulted in transfers of sections 2361a, 2358b, and 2374a to sections 4142, 1766, and 4025 of this title, respectively.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 636 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 636

  Referring the bill (H.R. 5481), entitled ``A bill for the relief of 
 Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, Victor Maron, Irving Berke, and 
  Adele E. Conrad'', to the chief judge of the United States Court of 
                  Federal Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2000

   Mr. Cox submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Referring the bill (H.R. 5481), entitled ``A bill for the relief of 
 Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, Victor Maron, Irving Berke, and 
  Adele E. Conrad'', to the chief judge of the United States Court of 
                  Federal Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

    The bill (H.R. 5481), entitled ``A bill for the relief of Sarabeth 
M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, Victor Maron, Irving Berke, and Adele E. 
Conrad'', now pending in the House of Representatives is referred to 
the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDINGS AND REPORT.

    Upon receipt of the bill under section 1, the chief judge shall--
            (1) proceed under sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, 
        United States Code; and
            (2) report back to the House of Representatives, at the 
        earliest practicable date, providing--
                    (A) such findings of fact and conclusions of law 
                that are sufficient to inform the Congress of the 
                nature, extent, and character of the claim for the 
                compensation referred to in the bill as a legal or 
                equitable claim against the United States; and
                    (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due 
                from the United States to the claimants.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content

## Menu

      -  Search         - Plant Materials Site
        - Plant Materials News
        - Videos 

## Search

      - Plant Materials Site
      - Plant Materials News
      - Videos

## Filters and Result Count

Clear

#### Custom range

## Search results

## Footer links

      - NRCS Home
      - USDA.gov
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-24 

February 14, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 208 Mergers, Consolidations and other Transfers of Plan Assets

4043(b)(8) Reportable Events. Mergers, Consolidations & other Transfers of Plan Assets 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your recent inquiry concerning the pension benefits of * * * which inquiry was forwarded to

this Corporation on * * * by the Labor-Management Services Administration of the Department of Labor. 

* * * is a participant of the * * * Salaried Pension Plan (hereinafter "Company Plan"), a single employer plan, which

is awaiting merger into the (hereinafter "Union Plan"), a multiemployer plan. The delay in * * * pension benefits is

caused by the fact that the insurance company which administers the funds of the Company Plan will not transfer those

funds to the Union Plan without the approval by this Corporation of the merger. 

Section 208 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter "Act") provides in pertinent part

that two pension plans may not merge unless each participant would be entitled to a pension benefit after merger equal

or greater in value than before the merger. The Act further provides that the above requirement applies to multiemployer

plans only to the extent determined by this [*2] Corporation. 

It is this Corporation's position that until it issues regulations relating to Act § 208, the constraints of that section

do not apply to the merger of a single employer plan into a multiemployer plan. Therefore, the proposed merger here

does not require the prior approval of this Corporation. 

If this Corporation had been previously advised of the proposed merger, the relevant parties would have been

informed that approval by this Corporation was not necessary and the delay in the proposed merger could have been

avoided. However, the records of this Corporation indicate that it received no communication with respect to the

proposed merger. Even though prior approval is not required, such merger would constitute a reportable event pursuant

to Act § 4043(b)(8) and should be reported to this Corporation as required by Act § 4043(a) within 30 days after the

plan administrator knows or has reason to know of the merger. 

This Corporation has contacted the attorney for the * * * and informed him of this Corporation's position under Act

§ 208 on plan mergers and the reporting requirements under Act § 4043. 

I hope this is of assistance to you. Should you desire additional [*3] information, we will be happy to provide it.

Steven E. Schanes 

Executive Director
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.11 What should an Indian tribe or tribal organization that is proposing a contract do about specifying the Federal property that the Indian tribe or tribal organization may wish to use in carrying out the contract? The Indian tribe or tribal organization is encouraged to provide the Secretary, as early as possible, with: ( a ) A list of the following Federal property intended for use under the contract: ( 1 ) Equipment;
( 2 ) Furnishings;
( 3 ) Facilities; and
( 4 ) Other real and personal property.
( b ) A statement of how the Indian tribe or tribal organization will obtain each item by transfer of title under section 105(f)(2) of the Act and section 1(b)(8) of the model agreement set forth in section 108(c) of the Act, through a temporary use permit, similar arrangement, or otherwise; and
( c ) Where equipment is to be shared by contracted and non-contracted programs, services, functions, or activities, a proposal outlining proposed equipment sharing or other arrangements.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130080 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130080 

 COA: 256302 

Wayne CC: 04-002106-01 

CHRISTOPHER DARNELL MOORE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
```

 EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
200 West Street
New York, New York 10282

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2012:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as assigned and agreed to under the
servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing
Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted in Schedule B.

March 15, 2013

/s/ Julie Eichler
JULIE EICHLER
Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
```

----

```

 (page)

(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

To: GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for GS Mortgage Securities Corp. II Commercial
Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2012-GC6, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Trustee, as applicable.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
```

----

```

 (page)

(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

To: GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
Commericial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2012-GCJ7, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, as applicable.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
```

----

```

 (page)

(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

To: GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

Schedule B

Material Instances of Non-Compliance

No instances to report

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
```
# C_2006311EN.01001501.xml

| 19.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/15

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 December 2006

(2006/C 311/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3095 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4537 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67155 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0555 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5993 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,06 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,141 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5781 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,7 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6974 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7968 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4185 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,66 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,839 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8663 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6779 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5114 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,18 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8997 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,023 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 214,1 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1727 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2406 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3655 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 899,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6553 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,604 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,566 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,022 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3095

JPY

Japanese yen

154,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4537

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67155

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0555

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5993

ISK

Iceland króna

90,06

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,141

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5781

CZK

Czech koruna

27,7

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6974

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7968

RON

Romanian leu

3,4185

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,66

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,839

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8663

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6779

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5114

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,18

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8997

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,023

KRW

South Korean won

1 214,1

ZAR

South African rand

9,1727

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2406

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3655

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 899,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6553

PHP

Philippine peso

64,604

RUB

Russian rouble

34,566

THB

Thai baht

47,022

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### §1148a. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section, acts June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VIII, §84, 48 Stat. 273; June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title II, §206, 61 Stat. 208, provided for reduction of capital of regional agricultural credit corporations by Farm Credit Administration. See section 2252 of this title.
[No. 4589.]

#### Martin, Warden, v. The District Court of the Second Judicial District and John I. Mullins, One of the Judges, et al.

Former Opinion Followed.

The writ of certiorari is allowed in this case, and the judgment of the district court set aside, for the reasons given in Martin, Warden, v. District Court-et ah, ante, p. 110.

*Original Application for Writ of Certiorari.*

Application by E. IT. Martin, as warden of the state penitentiary of Colorado, for an original writ of *certiorari*to review the action of the district court of the second judicial district of Colorado and John *120I. Mullins, one of the judges thereof, in releasing Jake Thomas from the penitentiary.

*Writ granted.*

Mr. N. C. Miller, attorney general, Mr. I. B. Melville, assistant attorney general, Mr. Henry A. Lindsley, district attorney, and Mr. Geo. Allan [Smith, assistant district attorney, for petitioners.

Mr. Justice Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court:

. An information was returned in the district court of Larimer county against respondent Thomas, charging him with the commission of larceny on the 8th of July, 1899. In the following September he was convicted and sentenced to confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of not less than four nor more than five years. This sentence was pronounced under the indeterminate sentence law of this state, which, it is said, did not become effective until after the crime was committed. To obtain his' release, Thomas applied for and obtained a writ of *habeas corpus*in the district court of the second judicial district, and upon a hearing was discharged from custody.

The attorney general and the district attorney, representing the warden of the penitentiary, have asked for and obtained a writ of *certiorari*in this court to review that judgment. The cause was consolidated for hearing with *Martin, etc., v. District Court et al.*(the opinion in which case is published at *ante,*p. 110) because precisely the same legal principle is involved in the two cases.

The decision there controls here. For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the writ is allowed, and the judgment reviewed set aside.

*Writ granted.*

Chief Justice Gabbert and Mr. Justice Steels concur.
H. Res. 434

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 9, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3081) to increase the

Federal minimum wage and to amend the Internal Revenue

Code of 1986 to provide tax benefits for small businesses,

and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read

for amendment. In lieu of the amendment recommended by

the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill,

an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the

text of H.R. 3832 shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as

amended, to final passage without intervening motion except:

(1) two hours of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one

motion to recommit with or without instructions.

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be

in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3846) to
2

•HRES 434 EH

amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the

minimum wage, and for other purposes. An amendment striking section 5 shall be considered adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and any further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce;

(2) the amendment numbered 2 in House Report 106–516,

which shall be in order without intervention of any point of

order (except those arising under section 425 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974) and which may be offered only

by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as

read, and shall be separately debatable for the time specified

in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent

and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or

without instructions.

SEC. 3. (a) In the engrossment of H.R. 3081, the Clerk

shall—

(1) await the disposition of H.R. 3846;

(2) add the text of H.R. 3846, as passed by the

House, as new matter at the end of H.R. 3081;

(3) conform the title of H.R. 3081 to reflect the addition of the text of H.R. 3846 to the engrossment;
3

•HRES 434 EH

(4) assign appropriate designations to provisions

within the engrossment; and

(5) conform provisions for short titles within the engrossment.

(b) Upon the addition of the text of H.R. 3846 to the

engrossment of H.R. 3081, H.R. 3846 shall be laid on the

table.

Attest:

Clerk.