alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 80 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 80

   Repealing rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1999

   Mr. Stearns (for himself, Mr. Goode, Mrs. Myrick, and Mr. Linder) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                                on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Repealing rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Resolved, That rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 70

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on International

Relations in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1999

Mr. GILMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

International Relations in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on International

4 Relations (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries,

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $11,659,355.00 for the One Hun9 dred Sixth Congress.
2

•HRES 70 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $5,776,761.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 1999, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2000; and

7 (2) not more than $5,882,594.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2000, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2001.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
H. Res. 91

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 4, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 707) to amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster

Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to authorize a program

for predisaster mitigation, to streamline the administration of

disaster relief, to control the Federal costs of disaster assistance, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration

of the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII

are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule
2

•HRES 91 EH

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now

printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature

of a substitute shall be considered by title rather than by section. Each title shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII.

Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone

until a time during further consideration in the Committee of

the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment;

and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another

electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the

minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series

of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment

in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be
3

•HRES 91 EH

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4429]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12459 and <greek-i>12460]


California Disaster <greek-i>CA-00162

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of California dated 02/02/2011.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Debris and Mud Flows.
    Incident Period: 12/17/2010 through 01/04/2011.
    Effective Date: 02/18/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/04/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/02/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an Administrative declaration 
for the State of California, dated 02/02/2011 is hereby amended to 
include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: San Diego.
Contiguous Counties:
    California: Imperial.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-4429 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-30 

September 22, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(2) Plans Covered. Government Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request for a determination by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation as to whether

the above pension plan (the "Plan") is excluded from coverage under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") by Section 4021(b)(2) of the Act. We conclude on the present facts that the Plan is a

governmental plan and thus is excluded from coverage by that section. 

As you have represented the facts, the * * *, the Plan sponsor, is a non-profit public corporation established under

the Georgia Hospital Authorities Law. The Authority was created by concurrent resolutions of the Mayor and City

Council of the City of * * * and of the * * * County Board of Commissioners. The general purpose of the Authority,

according to Article II, Section 1 of its Restated Bylaws, is "to possess and exercise public and governmental functions

to own, operate, manage and govern publicly supported hospital and related facilities in * * * County." * * * County is

the source for 3.3 percent of the Authority's operating revenues. The City and the County named the original members

of the Authority's Board of Trustees. [*2] Subsequently, new Trustees have been selected by sitting Trustees from

nominations made by the City and the County. 

The Authority is considered a governmental agency or instrumentaity for purposes of the Social Security and

unemployment compensation programs. Social Security contributions are paid to the federal government through the

State Employees Retirement Fund. 

 Based on the above, we have determined that the Authority is a governmental agency or instrumentality within the

meaning of Section 4021(b)(2) and, therefore, that the Plan is not covered by Title IV. 

I hope I have been of assistance. If you have any questions, please contact the attorney assigned to this case, ***

at (202) 254-3010. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### §1108. Authorization to operate business

Unless the court, on request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, orders otherwise, the trustee may operate the debtor's business.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2629; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §504, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 384.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

The House amendment adopts section 1108 of the House bill in preference to the style of an identical substantive provision contained in the Senate amendment. Throughout title 11 references to a "trustee" is read to include other parties under various sections of the bill. For example, section 1107 applies to give the debtor in possession all the rights and powers of a trustee in a case under chapter 11; this includes the power of the trustee to operate the debtor's business under section 1108.

#### senate report no. 95–989

This section permits the debtor's business to continue to be operated, unless the court orders otherwise. Thus, in a reorganization case, operation of the business will be the rule, and it will not be necessary to go to the court to obtain an order authorizing operation.

#### house report no. 95–595

This section does not presume that a trustee will be appointed to operate the business of the debtor. Rather, the power granted to trustee under this section is one of the powers that a debtor in possession acquires by virtue of proposed 11 U.S.C. 1107.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–353 inserted ", on request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
English Translation of Liability Transfer Agreement



 Exhibit 10.45 
 English Translation 
 Liability Transfer Agreement 
 Party A (creditor): Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co. Ltd. 
 Party B (debtor): Desheng Solar Energy Co., Ltd. 
 Party C (debt transferee): Jiangxi Jingke Solar Energy
Co., Ltd. 
 Through friendly negotiations, Party A, Party B and Party C reach agreement on the following stipulations with respect to the
liability transfer: 
 Article 1 It is agreed by Party A, Party B and Party C that the advance payment of RMB forty million (RMB
40,000,000.00) received by Party B under the contract (No. YGC070709001W) and Party B’s rights and obligations under such contract entered into between Party A and Party B, will be transferred to Party C as of the effective date of this
Agreement. The above amount will be offset by specific order amounts from June 2008 until it is fully offset. 
 Article 2 Party C
shall not refuse to perform or delay in the performance of its obligations to Party A under this Agreement by reason of any fault of Party B. 
 Article 3 No other provision or agreement relating to this Agreement between Party B and Party C or any third party may modify, amend or terminate this Agreement without the consent of Party A. 
 Article 4 Party B undertakes to provide the joint responsibility guarantee for the full performance of this Agreement. 
 Article 5 Any lawsuit arising in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the competent people’s court of first
instance in the place where Party A is located. 
 Article 6 This Agreement shall become effective after it is affixed by Party A,
Party B and Party C with their respective company seals. 
 Article 7 This Agreement is executed in triplicate, one copy for each party
hereto. 
 Party A (creditor) (signature & seal): 
 Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co. Ltd. (Seal) May 28, 2008 
 Party B (debtor) (signature &
seal): 
 Desun Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (Seal) May 25, 2008 
 Party C (debt transferee) (signature & seal) (Seal) May 25, 2008 
 Jiangxi Jingke Solar Energy
Co., Ltd.
#### ARVID NORDBY v. O. J. SORLIE.

(163 N. W. 833.)

*Henry Leum*and *Chas. A.*Lyche, for motion, and *Theo. 'Holder*and *John*Carmody, against motion.

Robinson, J.

This action is based on a claim of damages by reason of a collision between an automobile and a motor cycle driven by the plaintiff at a reckless dare-Devil speed. In November, 1916, the judgment of this court was that the verdict against the defendant be set aside and the action dismissed on the ground that the collision was the result of plaintiff’s reckless driving. On December 2d a motion for rehearing was duly denied. 35 N. D. 395, L.R.A.1917B, 753, 160 *289N. W. *70.*And now, on July 11th, after the lapse of over seven months, there is filed a second motion for rehearing, without any showing, only a mere contention that the decision of the court was wrong.

Now, from reading the record, the decision appears to be clearly right, but, if it were wrong, that would be no sufficient reason for allowing the motion to reconsider. There must be an end to litigation. TRe appeal was for the December, 1915, term. Appellant’s brief of T4 pages was filed February 15, 1916. Respondent’s brief of 48 pages was filed June 26, 1916. There is no claim that the counsel for each party did not have a fair opportunity to argue and present the case, and 'the long decision, covering five large printed pages, shows that the case was well argued and considered on its merits. Motion denied.

Grace, J. I concur in result.

Bruce, Ch. J., and Christianson, J.

I concur in the above. We Rave no rigRt to recall a remittitur in any case unless it has been handled down by inadvertence or mistake.
----

----

|            | R.K. MacLeod*, B.S., P.Eng., CEO and Board ChairmanH.J. Helwerda*, B.Sc., P.Eng., FEC, President&COOD.J. Carsted*, CD, B.Sc., P.Geol., Executive VP&CTOG.D. Robinson*, B.Sc., P.Eng., VP, InternationalC.P. Six*, B.Sc., P.Eng., VP, UnconventionalA.A. Szabo*, B.Sc., P.Eng., Manager, EngineeringS.W. Pennell*, B.S., P.Eng., Manager, Engineering, InternationalB.F. Jose, M.Sc., P.Geoph., VP, Geoscience, InternationalN.T. Stewart, B.A.Sc., P.Eng., VP, Engineering, CanadaK.P. McDonald, B.Comm., CA, CFOM.R. Van de Veen, QC, J.D., M.B.A., L.L.M., General Counsel, Corporate Secretary            *Directors |
|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Ref.: 3075 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|       | March 10, 2014                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |

|   | Sincerely,                     |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |                           |
|   | SPROUIE ASSOCIATES LIMITED     |
|   |                                |
|   | Vincent K. Hui, P.Eng.         |
|   | Petroleum Engineer and Partner |

----

----
#### § 503.1 Purpose of this part.

This part displays the control numbers and expiration dates assigned to information collection requirements of the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC, or the Commission) assigned by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*
### **CHAPTER 13—ADJUSTMENT OF DEBTS OF AN INDIVIDUAL WITH REGULAR INCOME**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—OFFICERS, ADMINISTRATION, AND THE ESTATE

Sec.
1301.
Stay of action against codebtor.
1302.
Trustee.
1303.
Rights and powers of debtor.
1304.
Debtor engaged in business.
1305.
Filing and allowance of postpetition claims.
1306.
Property of the estate.
1307.
Conversion or dismissal.
1308.
Filing of prepetition tax returns.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—THE PLAN

1321.
Filing of plan.
1322.
Contents of plan.
1323.
Modification of plan before confirmation.
1324.
Confirmation hearing.
1325.
Confirmation of plan.
1326.
Payments.
1327.
Effect of confirmation.
1328.
Discharge.
1329.
Modification of plan after confirmation.
1330.
Revocation of an order of confirmation.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–8, title VII, §716(b)(2), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 130, added item 1308.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF STEVEN N. MOORE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Steven N. Moore, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 10, 2004



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ STEVEN N. MOORE                                  
|Steven N. Moore President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 81.48 When are the results of the OIWA Election final? ( a ) If a challenge is sustained and has an effect on the outcome of the election, the Authorizing Official must authorize a recount or call for a new Secretarial election. The Authorizing Official will take the appropriate steps necessary to provide for a recount or a new Secretarial election.
( b ) If the challenges are denied or dismissed, the Authorizing Official will review and determine whether: ( 1 ) The percentage of total votes cast was at least 30 percent, or such percentages as may be required according to the tribe's governing document's amendment or adoption articles; and
( 2 ) The voters ratified or rejected the proposed document, proposed amendment or revocation.
( c ) The Authorizing Official must notify, in writing, the recognized governing body of the tribe, and the Director of the Bureau, of the following: ( 1 ) The decisions on challenges;
( 2 ) The outcome of the voting; and
( 3 ) That the proposed document, proposed amendments or revocation becomes effective as of the date of the Secretarial election; and
( 4 ) That the decision is a final agency action.
( d ) The Authorizing Official must: ( 1 ) Forward the original text of the document, Original Certificate of Approval, and the Certificate of Results of Election to the tribe and a copy of all documents to the Director of the Bureau; and
( 2 ) Retain, as required by the Records Disposition Schedule, a copy of all document(s) relevant to the Secretarial election.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of ITXC Corp. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the “Report”), I, Edward B. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (3)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (4)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated resultof operations of the Company for the periods presented. |

Dated: August 14, 2003

|   | */s/ EDWARD B. JORDAN*                                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                            |
|   | **Edward B. Jordan Chief Financial Officer of ITXC Corp.** |

This certification has beenfurnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. .