alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED STRATEGIC ALLIANCE AGREEMENT  (NICOTINIC ALPHA-7 PROGRAM)
 Amendment th Memory Roche
 th Agreement 
   1.
    
    Schedule 1 to the Agreement is hereby amended by amending and restating in its
entirety Item 2 under the heading [*]to read as set forth on Schedule A attached
hereto.2.
    
    This Amendment, along with the Agreement, shall constitute the entire agreement
between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of the Agreement. All other
terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. To the extent that
there are any inconsistencies between the terms of the Agreement and the terms of this
Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail in effect. This Amendment may be
executed by facsimile and in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original but all of such together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
  [*] CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED




---



##### 



MEMORY PHARMACEUTICALS
    
    
    
    HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.CORP.By:
    
    /s/ James R. Sulat
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Warwick S. BedwellName: James R. Sulat
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Warwick S. BedwellTitle: President and CEO
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Vice PresidentGlobal Head of Business DevelopmentF. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTDBy:
    
    /s/ Stefan ArnoldName:
    
    Stefan ArnoldTitle:
    
    Stv. DirektorBy:
    
    /s/ Dr.
    
    Tobias KiechleName:
    
    Dr. Tobias KiechleTitle:
    
    Stv: DirektorGlobal Head Alliance Management
 [*] CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED
 2




---



##### 



Schedule A
 Amended and Restated Item 2 under the heading
[*]
 [*] CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED
### §1107. Rights, powers, and duties of debtor in possession

(a) Subject to any limitations on a trustee serving in a case under this chapter, and to such limitations or conditions as the court prescribes, a debtor in possession shall have all the rights, other than the right to compensation under section 330 of this title, and powers, and shall perform all the functions and duties, except the duties specified in sections 1106(a)(2), (3), and (4) of this title, of a trustee serving in a case under this chapter.

(b) Notwithstanding section 327(a) of this title, a person is not disqualified for employment under section 327 of this title by a debtor in possession solely because of such person's employment by or representation of the debtor before the commencement of the case.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2628; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §503, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 384.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

The House amendment adopts section 1107(b) of the Senate amendment which clarifies a point not covered by the House bill.

#### senate report no. 95–989

This section places a debtor in possession in the shoes of a trustee in every way. The debtor is given the rights and powers of a chapter 11 trustee. He is required to perform the functions and duties of a chapter 11 trustee (except the investigative duties). He is also subject to any limitations on a chapter 11 trustee, and to such other limitations and conditions as the court prescribes cf. Wolf v. Weinstein, 372 U.S. 633, 649–650 (1963).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353 substituted "on a trustee serving in a case" for "on a trustee".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
§ 225.20 Authority to contract. ( a ) Any Indian tribe, subject to the approval of the Secretary and any limitation or provision contained in its constitution or charter, may enter into a minerals agreement with respect to mineral resources in which the tribe owns a beneficial or restricted interest.
( b ) Any individual Indian owning a beneficial or restricted interest in mineral resources may include those resources in a tribal minerals agreement subject to the concurrence of the parties and a finding by the Secretary that inclusion of the resources is in the best interest of the individual Indian mineral owner.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Newman & Company, Inc., :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1261 C.D. 2022

:

Mark Warner (Workers’ :

Compensation Appeal Board), :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, January 22, 2024, upon consideration of Petitioner’s

application for reargument, the application is DENIED.
### Part A—Transfer of Powers and Duties
§ 700.153 Actual reasonable moving and related expenses—residential moves. Subject to the limitations contained in this subpart, a certified eligible head of household is entitled to actual reasonable expenses for— ( a ) Transportation computed at prevailing federal per diem and mileage allowance schedules, meals and lodging away from home required by the Commission.
( b ) Transportation computed at prevailing federal per diem and mileage allowance schedules of the household and personal property from the acquired site to the replacement site.
( c ) Packing, crating, unpacking and uncrating of the personal property.
( d ) Disconnecting, dismantling, removing, reassembling and reinstalling relocated household appliances, and other personal property;
( e ) Storage of the personal property, not to exceed one year unless extended by the Commission.
( f ) Insurance of the personal property in connection with the move and necessary storage; and
( g ) Other moving related expenses that are not listed as ineligible under § 700.165, as the Commission determines to be reasonable and necessary.
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Barry W. Tackett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. for the
period ended June 30, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 22, 2005

/s/Barry W. Tackett
Barry W. Tackett, CFO (Principal Financial Officer)
Attorney Work Product

Preliminary Draft

Proposed GHG Emission Limits for FPL Port Everglades Next Generation Clean Energy Center (PEEC) Minor Sources 

Proposed Averaging Monitoring Rationa

Emission Unit GHG Limit Time or Performance Frequency/

Standard Method a b

Three Gas Compressors (Natural Gas) 55,400 TPY 12-month rolling 40 CFR 98 Typical minor source GHG Auxilliary Boiler (Natural Gas) 11,700 TPY 12-month rolling 40 CFR 98 Typical minor source GHG Natural Gas Heater (Natural Gas) 5,100 TPY 12-month rolling 40 CFR 98 Typical minor source GHG 

Two Emergency Generators (ULSD Oil)

Design and 

Work Practice Per 40 CFR 60 Subpart IIII

Periodic Inspections

Must operate and maintain manufacturer specification

Fire Pump Engine (ULSD Oil)

Design and 

Work Practice Per 40 CFR 60 Subpart IIII

Periodic Inspections

Must operate and maintain manufacturer specification

Two Circuit Breakers with SF 6

Design and 

Work Practice 0.5% leakage

Periodic Inspections Guarantee meeting IEC St

Temporary Construction Boilers (ULSD Oil) 36,700 TPY 12-month rolling 40 CFR 98 Typical minor source GHG 

Monitoring Methods for Tons/Year (TPY) Based on Fuel Usage and:

a Table C-2, S+C3ubpart C, 40 CFR 98 emission factors in kg/MMBtu 

Pollutant Natural Gas Distillate Fuel Oil

CO2 53.02 73.96

CH4 0.001 0.003

N2O 0.0001 0.0006

Conversion factor from kg/MMBtu to lb/MMBtu: 2.204

b CH4 and N2O are multiplied by CO2e factor

Pollutant CO2e Factor

CH4 21

N2O 310
# C_2006224EN.01001702.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/17

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal départemental des pensions militaires du Morbihan –France) — Ameur Echouikh v Secrétaire d'État aux Anciens Combattants

(Case C-336/05) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Euro-Mediterranean Agreement EC-Morocco - Article 65 - Principle of non-discrimination in matters of social security - Armed services invalidity pension)

(2006/C 224/31)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal départemental des pensions militaires du Morbihan

Parties

Applicant: Ameur Echouikh

Applicant:

Defendant: Secrétaire d'État aux anciens combattants

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal départemental des pensions militaires du Morbihan — Interpretation of Articles 64 and 65 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 26 February 1996 (OJ 2000 L 70, p. 2), of Articles 40 to 42 of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Morocco, signed in Rabat on 27 April 1976 (OJ 1978 L 264, p. 1) and of the general principle of non-discrimination based on nationality as enshrined in Article 12 of the EC Treaty and Article 14 of the ECHR — Direct effect — Meaning of ‘worker’, ‘remuneration’ and ‘social security benefit’ — National legislation refusing an armed services invalidity pension to a Moroccan national who has served in the Member State's armed forces

Operative part of the order

The first subparagraph of Article 65(1) of the Euro-Mediterranean establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 26 February 1996 and approved on behalf of the Communities by Decision 2000/204/EC, ECSC of the Council and Commission of 24 January 2000 is to be interpreted as meaning that it precludes the host Member State from refusing to grant an armed services invalidity pension to a Moroccan national who has served in that State's army and resides in its territory on the sole ground that the person concerned is of Moroccan nationality.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

1

---
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 14

- 00816

- CV

Style: Curocom Energy LLC and Curo Holdings Co. Ltd

v Woong Soon Eem and Jason Kim

Date motion filed: February 13, 2015

Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel

Party filing motion: Counsel for Woong Soon Eem ; J ason Kim ; W oolim Resources Development Company,

Ltd. ; Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC ; and Woolim Construction Company, Ltd.

The Kim Law Firm and Patterson PC have filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for Woong Soon Eem ; Jason Kim ;

W oolim Resources Development Company, Ltd. ; Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC ; and Woolim Construction

Company, Ltd. (collectively referenced as the “Woolim Parties” in the motion).

The motion to withdraw as counsel is granted . The Court requests that counsel send a copy of this order to the last

known address for each of the Woolim Parties.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

A cting individuall y

Date: February 24, 2015
​

Exhibit 10.2
FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of November 11, 2021, by and between Hurco Companies, Inc., an Indiana corporation (the “Company”), and Gregory Volovic (“Executive”).
Recitals
A.The Company and Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement entered into effective as of March 15, 2012 (the “Agreement”).
B.The Company and Executive now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment to reflect a change in Executive's role with the Company.
Amendment
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as follows:
1.Section 3 of the Agreement, Position and Responsibilities, is amended to add the following underlined language:  "During the Term, Executive agrees to serve as Chief Executive Officer or in such other position as the Company may designate from time to time, including but not limited to the designated position of Chief Executive Officer which Executive assumed effective March 12, 2021. In any such capacity, the Executive shall have such duties, authorities and responsibilities as are commensurate with such position and/or such additional or different duties and responsibilities as the Company may designate from time to time." 
2. Section 7.4 of the Agreement, Termination by the Company Without Cause, is amended to revise the Severance Period from nine (9) months to twelve (12) months, with all remaining provisions of Section 7.4 remaining in effect unchanged.
3.  Section 7.7 of the Agreement, Qualifying Termination in Connection with a Change in Control, is amended to revise the Enhanced Severance Period from eighteen (18) months to twenty-four (24) months, with all remaining provisions of Section 7.7 remaining in effect unchanged. 

​



​

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and the Company have executed this First Amendment, intending it to be effective as of the date noted above.
​
HURCO COMPANIES, INC.EXECUTIVE
​
​
By: /s/ Jonathon D. Wright______________/s/ Gregory Volovic______________
Name: Jonathon D. WrightGregory Volovic
Title: General Counsel

​
§ 513.37 What will the Commission do as the paying agency? ( a ) When the Commission receives a certification from a creditor agency that has complied with the Office of Personnel Management's requirements set out at 5 CFR 550.1109, the Commission will send the employee a written notice of salary offset.
( b ) If the Commission receives an incomplete certification from a creditor agency, the Commission will return the certification with notice that the procedures under 5 U.S.C. 5514 and 5 CFR 550.1104 must be followed and a properly certified claim submitted before the Commission will take action to collect the debt from the employee's current pay account.
( c ) Notice to a debtor will include: ( 1 ) The Commission's receipt of a certification from a creditor agency;
( 2 ) The amount of the debt and the deductions to be made, which may be stated as a percentage of disposable pay; and
( 3 ) The date and pay period when the salary offset will begin.
( d ) The Commission will provide a copy of the notice of salary offset to a creditor agency.
( e ) The Commission will coordinate salary deductions under this subpart as appropriate.
( f ) The Commission's payroll officer will determine the amount of the debtor's disposable pay and will implement the salary offset.
( g ) The Commission may use the following types of salary debt collection: ( 1 ) Lump sum offset. If the amount of the debt is equal to or less than 15 percent of disposable pay, the debt generally will be collected through one lump sum offset.
( 2 ) Installment deductions. The amount deducted from any period will not exceed 15 percent of the disposable pay from which the deduction is made unless the debtor has agreed in writing to the deduction of a greater amount. If possible, installment payments will liquidate the debt in three years or less.
( 3 ) Deductions from final check. A deduction exceeding the 15 percent of disposable pay limitation may be made from any final salary payment under 31 U.S.C. 3716 and the Federal Claims Collection Standards, in order to liquidate the debt, whether the employee is leaving voluntarily or involuntarily.
( 4 ) Deductions from other sources. If an employee subject to salary offset is leaving the Commission and the balance of the debt cannot be liquidated by offset of the final salary check, then the Commission may offset later payments of any kind against the balance of the debt, as allowed by 31 U.S.C. 3716 and the Federal Claims Collection Standards.
( h ) When two or more creditor agencies are seeking salary offsets, the Commission's payroll office may, in its discretion, determine whether one or more debts should be offset simultaneously within the 15 percent limitation.
( i ) The Commission is not authorized to review the merits of the creditor agency's determination with respect to the amount or validity of the debt certified by the creditor agency.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10009

In the Matter of: GARY R. COOPER; JUNANNE M. COOPER,

Debtors

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

GARY R. COOPER,

Appellant

v.

DIANE G. REED, Chapter 7 Trustee; THE CADLE COMPANY,

Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CV-576

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 7, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10009 Document: 00511626975 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/07/2011
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2012-2 Owner Trust
(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the unaffiliated party Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



Date: June 10, 2015



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|of American Honda Finance Corporation                | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
Parraguirre Cherry 

J. 

286 (1996). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its 

discretion, Parrish v. State, 116 Nev. 982, 989, 12 P.3d 953, 957 (2000), 

and we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge 

Washoe County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
§ 39.806 How is the SURV calculated? ( a ) The SURV is the adjusted national average current expenditures for residential schools (ANACER) of public and private residential schools. This average is determined using data from the Association of Boarding Schools.
( b ) Applying the procedure in paragraph (a) of this section, the SURV for school year 1999-2000 was $11,000.