alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Board
of Directors

Park Bridge
Lender Services LLC

New York, NY





We
have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Certification
Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria ("Management's Report"), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December
31, 2012, except for those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit A to Management's Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those
transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the
"Platform"). Reference Exhibit B to Management's Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on
our examination.



Our
examination was conducted in accordance with the standards for attestation engagements established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, including examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary under the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the
Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly,
our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security
included within the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.



In
our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria identified
in Exhibit A with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit B to Management's Report as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012, for the Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects.







Curcio,
Wieselthier & Cohen, C.P.A.'S, P.C. 
New York, NY

February11 , 2013











MEMBER
OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
§ 273.114 What programs may be contracted under the Johnson-O'Malley Act? All programs contracted under this part must: ( a ) Be developed and approved in full compliance with the powers and duties of the Indian Education Committee and as may be contained in the Committee's organizational documents and bylaws.
( b ) Be included as a part of the education plan.
§ 700.205 Eligibility requirements. A certified eligible head of household is eligible for the assistance payment pursuant to section 14(b) of the Act. ( a ) *Amount of payment.* The amount of payment shall be computed in accordance with the schedule provided for in section 14(b) of the Act.
( b ) *Date for determination of amount of assistance payment.* The date of completion and filing with the Commission of the Application for Relocation Assistance and Agreement to Relocate shall be the date used for determination of the amount of the assistance payment.
( c ) *Time of payment.* Assistance payments provided for in this section shall only be paid upon actual occupancy of the replacement dwelling and vacation of the acquired habitation and/or improvement, if any, in the area partitioned to the Tribe of which he/she is not a member.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044 Retirement Assumptions 
-  Retirement Rate Category Tables 2019 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Retirement Rate Category Tables 2019

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main XRA webpage.

**TABLE I-19 SELECTION OF RETIREMENT RATE CATEGORYFor valuation dates in 2019**

December 7, 2020
### §1749aaa–3. Regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter, after consulting with the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to any health or medical aspects of the program under this subchapter which may be involved in such regulations.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title XI, §1104, as added Pub. L. 89–754, title V, §502(a), Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1275; amended Pub. L. 98–479, title II, §201(a)(2), Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2227.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–479 substituted "Health and Human Services" for "Health, Education, and Welfare".
#### § 700.47 Commission.

The Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Commission is that entity established pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 640d-11 (section 12(a) of the Act).
### [§682. Renumbered §12314]
# C_2014101EN.01000301.xml

| 5.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/3

---

Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020: Acceptance of the proposed appropriate measures pursuant to Article 108(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by all Member States

(2014/C 101/03)

In paragraph 191 of the Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 (1), the Commission proposed to Member States to accept as appropriate measures the limitation of the application of all existing regional aid schemes which are not covered under a block exemption regulation and of all regional aid maps to aid intended to be awarded on or before 30 June 2014, as well as the amendment of other existing horizontal aid schemes providing specific treatment for aid to projects in assisted areas in order to ensure that aid to be awarded after 30 June 2014 complies with the regional aid map applicable on the date the aid is awarded. Member States were requested to confirm their acceptance of the proposed appropriate measures by 31 December 2013.

1

Pursuant to Article 19(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 EC (2), the Commission recorded the unconditional and explicit agreement to the appropriate measures by all Member States.

2

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 23.7.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1.

2

---
H. Res. 488

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 4, 2000.

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House

is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the legislative day of May 4, 2000, providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany the bill (H.R.

434) to authorize a new trade and investment policy for subSahara Africa, or any amendment reported in disagreement

from a conference thereon.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 700.143 Payments for divorced or separated relocatees. *General.* The following considerations apply to certified eligible heads of household who are legally separated or divorced and intend to establish separate eligibility. ( a ) Determination of benefits. Eligibility for relocation benefits is determined as of the time that the Relocation Contract is signed. ( 1 ) If the divorce or separation took place before benefits were first applied for, the spouse who vacated the habitation will not be eligible for benefits and all relocation benefits will accrue to the spouse remaining in occupancy as head of the household remaining to be relocated.
( 2 ) If both husband and wife are in possession of the habitation at the time that benefits are first applied for, and are divorced or separated prior to signing of a Relocation Contract, both husband and wife may qualify separately for benefits if each meets the requirements of eligibility under these regulations.
( 3 ) If both husband and wife are in possession of the habitation at the time a Relocation Contract is signed but are divorced or separated prior to occupancy of the replacement dwelling, only one benefit will be paid to the household. Such benefits (including the assistance payment, moving expenses and replacement dwelling benefit) and the purchase price of the habitation and improvements may be prorated between husband and wife in such manner as they may agree in writing so long as such proration is consistent with the terms of the Relocation Contract. Such proration may also be made by a court of competent jurisdiction. In the absence of an agreement between the parties or a court order, any necessary prorations shall be made by the Commission.
( b ) For purposes of this section, a head of household shall be considered as married even though living apart from his or her spouse unless legally separated under a decree or separate maintenance.
[47 FR 17988, Apr. 27, 1982]
#### § 26.29 What is the scope of the Job Training Program?

A service provider may offer career counseling, assessment, recommend training institutions that properly prepare applicants for entry into their career field, and help prepare applicants for gainful employment to the extent program funding will allow and based on applicants' established need.
**Exhibit10.4**

 

**AMENDMENTNO. 1**

**TO**

**EMPLOYMENTAGREEMENT**

This AMENDMENT NO.1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “**Amendment**”),dated as of April 15, 2003, is by and among Elgar Holdings, Inc., aDelaware corporation (“**Holdings**”),Elgar Electronics Corporation, a California corporation and a wholly ownedsubsidiary of Holdings (“**EEC**”),and John P. Mei (“**Executive**”).

**RECITALS**

WHEREAS,Executive, Holdings and EEC are party to an Employment Agreement, dated as ofDecember 30, 2002 (the “**EmploymentAgreement**”);

WHEREAS, Section 4.5of the Employment Agreement obligates Executive to purchase from Holdings, andHoldings to issue and sell to Executive, 150,000 shares of the common stock ofHoldings at a purchase price of $0.05 per share, with such sale and purchase totake place on or about February 28, 2003;

WHEREAS, byagreement of Executive, Holdings and EEC, the sale and purchase of those shareshas not yet occurred; and

WHEREAS,Executive, Holdings and EEC desire to amend the Employment Agreement to deletetherefrom Section 4.5 in its entirety.

**AGREEMENT**

NOW THEREFORE, inconsideration of the premises and the mutual agreements hereinafter set forth,the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

**1.             Amendment of Section 4.5. **Section 4.5 of the Agreement is hereby amended,superseded and replaced in its entirety by the following:

“**4.5.**       [intentionallyomitted]”

**2.             Waiver.** Each of the parties hereto expressly acknowledges and agrees that noother party hereto was in breach of the Employment Agreement because the saleand purchase of shares pursuant to Section 4.5 of the Employment Agreementwas not consummated prior to the date of this Amendment.

**3.             Governing Law.** This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, governed and enforced inaccordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

**4.             Counterparts. **This Agreement may be executed in one or morecounterpart copies, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all ofwhich taken together shall be deemed one and the same instrument.

**5.             NoFurther Amendment. **Except as amended hereby, the EmploymentAgreement shall continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Holdings and EEC have caused this Agreement to beexecuted on their behalf by their duly authorized officers and Executive hasexecuted the same as of the day and year first above written.

**ELGARHOLDINGS, INC.**
| By:    | /s/ Donald Glickman                                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Donald Glickman  Chairman of the Board and Vice President |

**ELGARELECTRONICS CORPORATION**
| By:             | /s/ Donald Glickman                                       |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|            | Donald Glickman  Chairman of the Board and Vice President |
|            |                                                      |
|            |                                                      |
| /s/ John P. Mei |
| John P. Mei     |

 

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.148 How can an Indian tribe or tribal organization secure a determination that a law or regulation has been superseded by the Indian Self-Determination Act, as specified in section 107(b) of the Act?

Any Indian tribe or tribal organization may at any time submit a request to the Secretary for a determination that any law or regulation has been superseded by the Act and that the law has no applicability to any contract or proposed contract under the Act. The Secretary is required to provide an initial decision on such a request within 90 days after receipt. If such a request is denied, the Indian tribe or tribal organization may appeal under subpart L of these regulations. The Secretary shall provide notice of each determination made under this subpart to all Indian tribes and tribal organizations.
§ 39.135 What services must be provided to an LEP student? A school must provide services that assist each LEP student to: ( a ) Become proficient in English and, to the extent possible, proficient in their Native language; and
( b ) Meet the same challenging academic content and student academic achievement standards that all students are expected to meet under 20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(1).
# C_2006249EN.01000303.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/3

---

Action brought on 4 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-340/06)

(2006/C 249/08)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC (1), or by not informing the Commission of such provisions, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC (1), or by not informing the Commission of such provisions, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive expired on 14 February 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 41, pp. 26-32

1

---
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN MIETUS, LLC

6701 DEMOCRACY BOULEVARD, SUITE 300

BETHESDA, MD 20817-7500

JOHN R. MIETUS, JR. 

(202) 747-5212

(240) 396-5362 fax

john@mietuslaw.com

September 10, 2013

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

Ms. Esta Rosenberg

Mr. Robert Finamore

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington DC 20590

Re: Docket OST-2013-0170, Joint Application of

Aeromexico and Delta (Puerto Vallarta-Chicago)

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Finamore:

The Joint Applicants have completed their poll of the U.S. carriers served on 

September 5, 2013 with the above-captioned application. There were no objections.

The Joint Applicants would appreciate expedited Department action on its 

application.

Respectfully submitted,

John R. Mietus, Jr.

Counsel for Aeromexico
### §§145, 146. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–258, §5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068

Section 145, act July 14, 1890, ch. 708, §2, 26 Stat. 289, authorized counting of treasury notes held by national banking associations as part of their lawful reserve.

Section 146, act July 12, 1882, ch. 290, §12, 22 Stat. 165, related to holding of gold and silver certificates by national banking associations.
# C_2006331EN.01000701.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v B.F. Joustra

(Case C-5/05) (1)

1

(Tax provisions - Harmonisation of laws - Directive 92/12/EEC - Excise duties - Wine - Articles 7 to 10 - Determination of the Member State in which duties are chargeable - Acquisition by a private individual for his own use and that of other private individuals - Transport to another Member State by a transport undertaking - Arrangements applicable in the Member State of destination)

(2006/C 331/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Appellant:

Respondent: B.F. Joustra

Respondent:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Articles 7, 8 and 9 of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1) — Wine purchased without the intention of making a profit in one Member State by nationals of another Member State and transported by an undertaking from that second Member State — Excise duty paid in the first Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products, as amended by Council Directive 92/108/EEC of 14 December 1992, must be construed as meaning that where, as in the case in the main proceedings, a private individual who is not operating commercially or with a view to making a profit acquires in one Member State, for his own personal requirements and those of other private individuals, products subject to excise duty which have been released for consumption in that Member State and arranges for them to be transported to another Member State on his behalf by a transport company established in that other State, Article 7 of that Directive, and not Article 8 thereof, is applicable, with the result that excise duty is also to be levied in that other State. Under Article 7(6) of the Directive, the excise duty paid in the first State is, in such a case, to be reimbursed in accordance with Article 22(3) of the Directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 19.3.2005.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Legend Mobile, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  December 5, 2003              By:  /s/ Peter Klamka
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Peter Klamka
                                           Chief Executive and Principal
                                           Accounting Officer
### §8113. Navy and Marine Corps: warrant officer grades

The warrant officer grades in the Navy and the Marine Corps are:

(1) Chief warrant officer, W–⁠5.

(2) Chief warrant officer, W–4.

(3) Chief warrant officer, W–3.

(4) Chief warrant officer, W–2.

(5) Warrant officer, W–1.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 314, §5503; Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title XI, §1131(9), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1506; renumbered §8113, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5503 | 34 U.S.C. 135a(a) (less last sentence). | May 29, 1954, ch. 249, §3(a) (less 3d and last sentence), 68 Stat. 157. |

This section is included in subtitle C for completeness and clarity. In duplicates, in part, §§555 and 597 of this title, which cover, respectively, the "permanent regular warrant officer grades" and the "permanent reserve warrant officer grades" in the armed forces. The concept that regular grades differ from reserve grades and that a grade held under a permanent appointment differs from the grade of the same name held under a temporary appointment is foreign to the naval service. In the Navy and the Marine Corps, all officers serving, for example, in the grade of chief warrant officer, W–4, are considered to be serving in the same grade regardless of whether they are Regulars or Reserves and regardless of whether they are temporary or permanent officers holding temporary or permanent appointments in that grade. This section, therefore, lists the four warrant officer grades as applicable to all warrant officers of the naval service.

Reference to the pay grades corresponding to the military grades is omitted as unnecessary for the purpose of this section.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5503 of this title as this section.

1991—Pub. L. 102–190 added par. (1) and redesignated former pars. (1) to (4) as (2) to (5), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–190 effective Feb. 1, 1992, see section 1132 of Pub. L. 102–190, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.