alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### D’Agostino et al. *v.*General Tank Car Corporation.

[No. 12,116.

Filed January 15, 1925.]

Master and *Servant.—Industrial Board’s order suppressing, depositions not*appealable.—An appeal cannot be taken from an order of the Industrial Board suppressing depositions, as the Workmen’s Compensation Act authorizes an appeal only from a final award.

*376From Industrial Board of Indiana.

Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for compensation by Alfonso D’Agostino and another against the General American Tank Car Corporation. From an order suppressing depositions, the claimants appeal.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Solon B. Selleek*and *Harry E. Raitino,*for appellants.

*William J. Whinery,*for appellee.

Thompson. J.

The claimants, appellants herein, filed application for compensation, which application was heard by a member of the Industrial Board who found against claimants. Claimants then asked for a review of the award of said member by the full board. The defendant, appellee herein, filed a motion to suppress certain depositions of witnesses taken in Italy, for reasons stated in said motion. This motion was sustained and the following order was made by the full Industrial Board: “It is therefore considered and ordered by the full Industrial Board of Indiana, by a- majority of its members, that the depositions of the above named witnesses be and the same are hereby suppressed.”

The statute provides that an appeal can be taken only from a final award made by the Industrial Board. This is not a final award, but merely an order suppressing the depositions. We need not pass upon the ruling of the board in suppressing the depositions for the reason that the motion to dismiss the appeal should be sustained. (For authority see *Kuratnik*v. *Illinois Steel Co.*(1925), *ante*366, 146 N. E. 216.)

Motion sustained, and appeal, dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

CASE NO. DA 22-0731 

TCF ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a 

MALMQUIST CONSTRUCTION and 

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiffs/Appellees. 

vs. 

RAMES, INC. formerly d/b/a CENTRAL 

INSURANCE AGENCY, 

Defendant/Appellant. 

FILED 

JUN 0 1 2023 

EICAN1311 Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Appellees' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, 

and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellees are granted an extension of time 

to and including July 3, 2023, within which to prepare, file and serve their response 

brief. 

1 

06/01/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0731
§ 151.15 How will the Secretary conduct a review of environmental conditions? ( a ) The Secretary shall comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (43 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*), applicable Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and Department of the Interior regulations (43 CFR part 46) and guidance. The Secretary's compliance may require preparation of an environmental impact statement, an environmental assessment, a categorical exclusion, or other documentation that satisfies the requirements of NEPA.
( b ) The Secretary shall comply with the terms of 602 DM 2, Land Acquisitions: Hazardous Substances Determinations, or its successor policy if replaced or renumbered, so long as such guidance remains in place and binding. If the Secretary approves a request for the acquisition of land in trust status, the Secretary may then require, before formalization of acceptance pursuant to § 151.16, that the applicant provide information updating a prior pre-acquisition environmental site assessment conducted under 602 DM 2. ( 1 ) If no recognized environmental conditions or other environmental issues of concern are identified in the pre-acquisition environmental site assessment or before formalization of acceptance and all other requirements of this section and §§ 151.13 and 151.14 are met, the Secretary shall acquire the land in trust.
( 2 ) If recognized environmental conditions or other environmental issues of concern are identified in the pre-acquisition environmental site assessment or before formalization of acceptance, the Secretary shall notify the applicant and may seek additional information or action from the applicant to address such issues of concern. The Secretary may require the elimination of any such issues of concern prior to the formalization of acceptance.
Exhibit 21

The ADT Corporation (a Delaware corporation)

Significant Subsidiaries



|              |  |                                            |  |       |    | 
|------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | ----- | -- | 
|Country       |  | Entity                                     |  | State |   
|Canada        |  | ADT Security Services Canada, Inc.         |  |       |    | 
|Gibraltar     |  | Tyco International (Gibraltar) III Limited |  |       |    | 
|Puerto Rico   |  | ADT Puerto Rico, LLC                       |  |       |    | 
|United States |  | ADT Canada Holdings, Inc.                  |  |       | DE | 
|United States |  | ADT Holdings, Inc.                         |  |       | DE | 
|United States |  | ADT Investments, Inc.                      |  |       | DE | 
|United States |  | ADT LLC                                    |  |       | DE | 
|United States |  | ADT US Holdings, Inc.                      |  |       | DE | 
|United States |  | Electro Signal Lab, Inc.                   |  |       | DE | 
|United States |  | S2 Mergersub Inc.                          |  |       | NJ |
# C_2006281EN.01002901.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/29

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 September 2006 — CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA v Commission

(Case T-226/01) (1)

1

(Non-contractual liability - Tendering procedure - Payment in kind - Damage suffered on the market in question due to the payment in kind - Causal link)

(2006/C 281/47)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA (Castagnaro, Italy) (represented by: G. Roberti, F. Sciaudone and A. Franchi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga and L. Visaggio, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for compensation for the damage allegedly caused by Commission Decisions C (96) 1916 of 22 July 1996 and C (96) 2208 of 6 September 1996, adopted in the context of Commission Regulation (EC) No 228/96 of 7 February 1996 on the supply of fruit juice and fruit jams intended for the people of Armenia and Azerbaijan (OJ 1996 L 30, p. 18).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 24.11.2001.

1

---
#### § 215.4 Leases to be sold at public auction.

Except as otherwise provided in the regulations in this part, no lead and zinc mining lease under this part of restricted or trust allotted and inherited Indian lands within and under the Quapaw Indian Agency shall be made except to the highest responsible bidder at public auction.
### §7024. Director of Small Business Programs

(a) Director.—There is a Director of Small Business Programs in the Department of the Army. The Director is appointed by the Secretary of the Army.

(b) Office of Small Business Programs.—The Office of Small Business Programs of the Department of the Army is the office that is established within the Department of the Army under section 15(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(k)). The Director of Small Business Programs is the head of such office.

(c) Duties and Powers.—(1) The Director of Small Business Programs shall, subject to paragraph (2), perform such duties regarding small business programs of the Department of the Army, and shall exercise such powers regarding those programs, as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe.

(2) Section 15(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(k)), except for the designations of the Director and the Office, applies to the Director of Small Business Programs.

(Added Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title IX, §904(c)(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3400, §3024; renumbered §7024, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3024 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

The Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization of the Department of the Army and the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization of the Department of the Army were redesignated the Director of Small Business Programs of the Department of the Army and the Office of Small Business Programs of the Department of the Army, respectively, by Pub. L. 109–163, which also provided that references to the former were deemed to refer to the latter. See section 904(a) of Pub. L. 109–163, set out as a note under section 144 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson Respiratory Care Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Patrick G. Yount, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, that:

|  | 1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   |   |   |                                                                                                            |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ PATRICK G. YOUNT                                                                                            |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                 |
|   |   |   | **Patrick G. Yount****Chief** **Financial** **Officer** **and** **Secretary**August 8, 2003 |
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiffs in error *v.*William Howell et al., Defendants in error.

(Argued February 23, 1877;

decided March 20, 1877.)

Reported below, 6 Hun, 620.

*J. Keck*for Plaintiffs in error.

*H. B. Cushney*for Defendants in error.

Agree to affirm on opinion of Learned, J., in court below

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
### §1186. Property of the estate

(a) Inclusions.—If a plan is confirmed under section 1191(b) of this title, property of the estate includes, in addition to the property specified in section 541 of this title—

(1) all property of the kind specified in that section that the debtor acquires after the date of commencement of the case but before the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 7, 12, or 13 of this title, whichever occurs first; and

(2) earnings from services performed by the debtor after the date of commencement of the case but before the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 7, 12, or 13 of this title, whichever occurs first.

(b) Debtor Remaining in Possession.—Except as provided in section 1185 of this title, a plan confirmed under this subchapter, or an order confirming a plan under this subchapter, the debtor shall remain in possession of all property of the estate.

(Added Pub. L. 116–54, §2(a), Aug. 23, 2019, 133 Stat. 1081.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Aug. 23, 2019, see section 5 of Pub. L. 116–54, set out as an Effective Date of 2019 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
IV

House Calendar No. 180

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 444

[Report No. 106–532]

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1287) to provide for the storage

of spent nuclear fuel pending completion of the nuclear waste repository,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 2000

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1287) to provide

for the storage of spent nuclear fuel pending completion

of the nuclear waste repository, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (S.

3 1287) to provide for the storage of spent nuclear fuel

4 pending completion of the nuclear waste repository, and

5 for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read

6 for amendment. The previous question shall be considered
2

HRES 444 RH

1 as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening

2 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and

3 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

4 of the Committee on Commerce; and (2) one motion to

5 commit.

House Calendar No. 180

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. Res. 444

[Report No. 106–532]

RESOLUTIOIN

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1287) to

provide for the storage of spent nuclear fuelpending completion of the nuclear waste repository, and for other purposes.

MARCH 21, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Roland Vetter, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of QuadTech
International, Inc. for the quarter ended July 31, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

September 11, 2007

|"signed J R Vetter"J. Roland Vetter
    Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Burgess, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 4, 2009



|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    Mark S. Burgess       
|    |  | Mark S. Burgess              
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|    |  | (principal executive officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm





To the Board of Directors of CoreLogic, Inc.:



We have examined management’s assertion,
included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the "Company"),
an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served
as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2012 and for the year then ended, only including
1122(d)(1)(iv),

1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities
performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance
with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities related
to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by
this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent
to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion
that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012
for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider
is fairly stated, in all material respects.







February 6, 2013











PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201

T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991,
www.pwc.com/us