alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006231EN.01000101.xml

| 26.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 September 2006

(2006/C 231/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2768 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4595 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67120 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3019 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5799 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,49 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3895 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5767 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,453 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9704 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5459 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,60 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,501 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9275 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6987 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4259 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9390 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9136 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0235 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 205,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6974 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1138 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4350 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 807,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,699 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,280 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0870 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2768

JPY

Japanese yen

148,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4595

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67120

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3019

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5799

ISK

Iceland króna

89,49

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3895

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5767

CZK

Czech koruna

28,453

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9704

RON

Romanian leu

3,5459

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,60

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,501

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9275

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6987

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4259

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9390

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9136

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0235

KRW

South Korean won

1 205,49

ZAR

South African rand

9,6974

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1138

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4350

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 807,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,699

PHP

Philippine peso

64,280

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0870

THB

Thai baht

47,850

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 290.6 Who must submit a tribal revenue allocation plan?

Any Indian tribe that intends to make a per capita payment from net gaming revenues must submit one.
### SUBCHAPTER III—THE PLAN
### SUBCHAPTER X—BANK EXAMINATIONS; REPORTS
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.136 How will the Secretary's report address a Tribe's noncompliance? This section applies if the Secretary conducts a review and evaluation or investigation of a notice of violation of Federal law or the terms of a TERA. ( a ) If the Secretary determines that the Tribe has not complied with Federal law or the terms of a TERA, the Secretary's written report must include a determination of whether the Tribe's noncompliance has resulted in harm or the potential for harm to a physical trust asset.
( b ) If the Secretary determines that the Tribe's noncompliance may cause harm or has caused harm to a physical trust asset, the Secretary must also determine whether the noncompliance cause imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward L. Pierce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BindView Development
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2004

   /s/ EDWARD L. PIERCE
   --------------------------------------
   Edward L. Pierce
   Director, Executive Vice President and
   Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JACOB SULLIVAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 38 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2018, the Motion for Leave to File a Short Reply 

Brief, the Motion to File Appendix under Seal and Ex Parte, and the Petition for 

Extraordinary Jurisdiction are DENIED.
### §1786. Dependent student travel within the United States

Funds available to the Department of Defense for the travel and transportation of dependent students of members of the armed forces stationed overseas may be obligated for transportation allowances for travel within or between the contiguous States.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §568(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 331.)
### [§2541. Renumbered §4981]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2541 was renumbered section 2551 of this title.

Another prior section 2541 was renumbered section 4892 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****MEMORY PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Each of the undersigned officers of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. (the “Company”) herebycertifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2007 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   /s/ James R. Sulat   JAMES R. SULAT  President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)  August 14, 2007     /s/ Joseph M. Donabauer   JOSEPH M. DONABAUER  Vice President & Controller  (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)  August 14, 2007   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. and will be retained by MemoryPharmaceuticals Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### § 81.43 How are the results of the Election challenged?

Any person who was listed on the Eligible Voters List and who submitted a voter registration form may challenge the results of the Secretarial election. The written challenge, with substantiating evidence, must be received by the Chairman of the Secretarial Election Board within 5 days after the Certificate of Results of Election is posted, not including the day the Certificate of Results of Election is posted. Challenges received after the deadline for filing challenges will not be considered. If the third day falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the challenge must be received by close of business on the next business day.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsConcept of Operations for Integrating Commercial Supersonic Transport Aircraft into the National Airspace SystemSeveral businesses and government agencies, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration are currently working on solving key technological barriers that must be overcome in order to realize the vision of low-boom supersonic flights conducted over land. However, once these challenges are met, the manner in which this class of aircraft is integrated in the National Airspace System may become a potential constraint due to the significant environmental, efficiency, and economic repercussions that their integration may cause. This document was developed to create a path for research and development that exposes the benefits and barriers of seamlessly integrating a class of CSTs into the NAS, while also serving as a Concept of Operations (ConOps) which posits a mid- to far-term solution (2025-2035) concept for best integrating CST into the NAS. Background research regarding historic supersonic operations in the National Airspace System, assumptions about design aspects and equipage of commercial supersonic transport (CST) aircraft, assumptions concerning the operational environment are described in this document. Results of a simulation experiment to investigate the interactions between CST aircraft and modern-day air traffic are disseminated and are used to generate scenarios for CST operations. Finally, technology needs to realize these operational scenarios are discussed.Document ID20180000699Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsUnderwood, Matthew C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 25, 2018Publication DateDecember 1, 2017Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberL-20893NASA/TP-2017-219796NF1676L-28612Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 110076.02.07.05.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180000699.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John A. Kritzmacher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: August 4, 2009   
|                       
|/S/ JOHN A. KRITZMACHER
|John A. Kritzmacher    
|Chief Financial Officer
#### Jesus Rios v. The State.

No. 22812.

Delivered March 29, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*P. E. Campbell,*of Seguin, and *P. C. Ibarra,*of San Antonio, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

*126Appellant was convicted of' an assault to murder without malice, and given a term of two and one-half years in the penitentiary.

This is a companion case to cause No. 22811, Louis Rios v. State, this day decided, (reported in this volume) and -the facts are practical!y the same in that case, to which we refer, save as to who fired a shot with a pistol. In this case appellant himself testified that he fired the shot in order to scare some negroes who were threatening to attack him; that he shot up in the air and at no one, and he also denied that soon thereafter he pointed this" pistol at another negro, about half a block away, who had seen the difficulty.

The only bill of exceptions complains of allowing the introduction of the testimony relative to the pointing of the pistol at the negro located a half block away from where the shooting occurred. This negro man testified that he saw the difficulty and tried to catch the number of the car in which appellant and his brother left the scene, but only got the first two numbers thereof. This appeared to be immediately after the shooting, and as appellant and his brother were leaving the scene, and we think same was a part of the res gestae of the transaction, as suggested by the trial court in his qualification to the bill, and as held in the companion case, our No. 22811.

The trial court charged the jury on the law of an assault to murder without malice, as well as on aggravated assault and self-defense, and we find no objections to the charge in the record.

No error being shown, the judgment is affirmed.
### Af^vc^^ts RoW<\ -Vo ^uooWftveivV 4W record "To TUe HoivortxViW C^.v^^V, This, rn^VvoA *"* *tv ve£ex&(\<Le. -\x> -mlts C-o^r-Vs qcatv\W^ ^~V\e 

### K^P^a^S Or\cA\o<\ -Vo a\Vc>v> SuQp\e<we/\-VaVic>*vs ©1 tkq, habeas Ap^UdcuvV r^uesVs VWV \V\s ClourV uoA\ ao(o^V A^Wc&ftrs 

### CwcA\o<\ A"D aV^ecA +D S"Wk, d^ /ipf^W<vV <xVW-<\e\jS ^SfCA^e -(^c- A\\\s (purpose. ^OTll©^ OEM DATE: 3 ' ' 

### ?ccL^r'. BY; """

RECEIVED IN COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS MAR 05 2018 Deana Williamson, ClerkClee^cvv*. c~a\c o» V S <zjr^\cjg_

r\<^oe^--UAW ShjlV>ck\\\eJC=ouA oT C_r\<w;oa\ A^peaAS.

T?o. Box I23<^ Co9\\o\ 5AoA\o<\



### ^c ^d^o^d, +? W ftW uM\\ \VvS CourV \a v/oue USu.aV .Task* I'OWr 

## /r^r
"FeAAts^ee ColoAyfT*< 75^g</
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-165 

September 26, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4023 Contingent Liability Coverage 

OPINION: 

 In response to your request (on behalf of the above-named) for an opinion as to the date when contingent employer

liability insurance ("CELI") will be made available to employers who are participants in multiemployer plans, please be

advised that no date has as yet been set in that regard. 

As you are aware, the staff of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC"), and a special CELI

subcommittee of the PBGC Advisory Committee, have been working hard at developing a feasible CELI program. The

subcommittee * * * is expected to submit its report shortly. The subcommittee report will then be referred to the

Advisory Committee which will make its recommendations to the PBGC. It is expected that the Board of Directors will

consider the matter at an early meeting. 

As you note in your letter, it is our view that Section 4023, as finally enacted, is directory in character and that the

36-month reference pertains to efforts to evolve a joint CELI program with private insurers. Such efforts, as you know,

have been unsuccessful. 

In any event, Section 4023(d) provides that no CELI coverage will become effective until premiums have been paid

for 60 [*2] months. It is presently contemplated that when CELI coverage is offered with respect to both single and

multiemployer plans, premiums will be payable retroactively. Since the earliest date that CELI coverage can become

effective is September 2, 1979 under present law, there is no immediate prejudice to employers. 

I trust the above serves the purpose of your inquiry. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.112 What must the Secretary do upon receipt of a petition? Within 20 days after receiving a petition, the Secretary must: ( a ) Notify the Tribe in writing that the Secretary has received a petition;
( b ) Provide a copy of the complete petition to the Tribe;
( c ) Initiate a petition consultation with the Tribe that will address the petitioner's allegation of a Tribe's noncompliance with a TERA and alternatives to resolve any noncompliance; and
( d ) Notify the Tribe in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, when the petition consultation is complete.
EXHIBIT 8.1  Company

Country of IncorporationEdwards (Cayman   Islands I) Ltd

Cayman IslandsEdwards (Cayman   Islands II) Ltd

Cayman IslandsEdwards Chemical   Management Europe Ltd

United KingdomEdwards GmbH

GermanyEdwards High   Vacuum International Ltd

United KingdomEdwards Holdco   Limited

United KingdomEdwards Holdco   1, Inc

United States of   AmericaEdwards Vacuum Hong Kong Ltd

Hong KongEdwards India   Private Ltd

IndiaEdwards Israel   Vacuum Ltd

IsraelEdwards Japan Ltd

JapanEdwards Korea Ltd

South KoreaEdwards Ltd

United KingdomEdwards S.p.A.

ItalyEdwards s.r.o.

Czech RepublicEdwards SAS

FranceEdwards Services   s.r.o.

Czech RepublicEdwards   Technologies Ltd

TaiwanEdwards   Technologies Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.

MalaysiaEdwards   Technologies Singapore PTE Ltd

SingaporeEdwards   Technologies Trading (Shanghai) Company Ltd

Peoples Republic   of ChinaEdwards Technologies Vacuum Engineering   (Qingdao) Company Ltd

Peoples Republic   of ChinaEdwards   Technologies Vacuum Engineering (Shanghai) Company Ltd

Peoples Republic   of ChinaEdwards UKCo 2 Ltd

United KingdomEdwards US Holdco   Ltd

United KingdomEdwards Vacuo Ltda

BrazilEdwards Vacuum Ltd

United KingdomEdwards Vacuum   Technology Ireland Ltd

IrelandEdwards Vacuum, Inc

United Stated of   AmericaHibon   International SA

FranceHibon SAS

FranceSA Edwards Vacuum   NV

Belgium
§ 425.5 Disclosure of records to agencies or persons other than the individual to whom the record pertains. Records subject to the Privacy Act that are requested by any person other than the individual to whom they pertain will not be made available except under the following circumstances: ( a ) Records may be circulated to appropriate officials incident to placing Fellows in work assignments for the Fellowship year.
( b ) An accounting of the date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure of a record as well as the name and address of the person and agency to whom the disclosure was made will be indicated on the record. This accounting is available to the individual to whom the records pertain on written request to the Commission.
[40 FR 52416, Nov. 10, 1975; 40 FR 56651, Dec. 4, 1975, as amended at 40 FR 59187, Dec. 22, 1975]
### §889. Art. 89. Disrespect toward superior commissioned officer; assault of superior commissioned officer

(a) Disrespect.—Any person subject to this chapter who behaves with disrespect toward that person's superior commissioned officer shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Assault.—Any person subject to this chapter who strikes that person's superior commissioned officer or draws or lifts up any weapon or offers any violence against that officer while the officer is in the execution of the officer's office shall be punished—

(1) if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct; and

(2) if the offense is committed at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 67; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5408, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2941.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 889 | 50:683. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 89), 64 Stat. 135. |

The word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in subsec. (b) of this section were contained in section 890 of this title, prior to amendment by Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5409, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2942.

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Any person subject to this chapter who behaves with disrespect toward his superior commissioned officer shall be punished as a court-martial may direct."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E.
Hamilton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham
     Packaging Holdings Company.

Date: May 11, 2004


                                        By: /s/ John E. Hamilton
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            John E. Hamilton
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       1
<PAGE>