alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4220]



[[Page 10572]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for 
the Modernization and Enhancement of Ranges, Airspace, and Training 
Areas in the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex in Alaska

AGENCY:  U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army.

ACTION:  Notification of Extension of Scoping Period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army, on behalf of Alaskan 
Command (ALCOM), are issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
extension to submit scoping comments. The initial Notice of Intent 
published in the Federal Register on December 8, 2010 (Federal Register 
Vol. 75, No. 235, 76444), requested scoping comments no later than 
February 4, 2011. The Air Force and Army have extended the deadline for 
submitting scoping comments to March 4, 2011. All are encouraged to 
provide comments on the proposed actions either by mail, postmarked or 
electronically submitted no later than March 4, 2011, to ensure 
consideration in the draft EIS. All comments received during this 
scoping period will be considered in the preparation of the draft EIS.
    Point of Contact: Please direct any written comments or requests 
for information to ALCOM Public Affairs, 9480 Pease Avenue, Suite 120, 
JBER, AK 99506, Phone: 907-552-2341, Fax: 907-552-5411 or submit them 
electronically at http://www.jparceis.com. You may also request 
handicap assistance or translation services for the public scoping 
meetings in advance through the ALCOM Public Affairs Office.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-4220 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
Exhibit 10.62
​
	
	FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTINUING GUARANTY THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTINUING GUARANTY (the “First Amendment”) is effective as of May 12, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) between, Lodging Fund REIT III OP, LLC, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Guarantor”) and EPH Development Fund, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Lender”). A. Guarantor and Lender are party to a certain Continuing Guaranty (the “Continuing Guaranty”) dated May 12, 2021. B. The Continuing Guaranty is a requirement of the Amended and Restated Promissory Note and Loan Agreement each dated May 12, 2021, between LF3 EL PASO TRS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and LF3 EL PASO, LLC a Delaware limited liability company (collectively, “Borrower”) and Lender. Guarantor is the direct and indirect affiliate or sole member of Borrower. C. Defined terms used in this First Amendment have the same meaning as the Continuing Guaranty, unless stated otherwise herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Guarantor and Lender hereby agree as follows: 1. AMENDMENT TO PARAGRAPH 10(c). Paragraph 10(c) of the Continuing Guaranty is amended to read in its entirety as follows: “(c) at all times, maintain a Net Worth of at least $50,000,000.00.” 2. COUNTERPARTS; FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. This First Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original, and all counterparts will constitute one and the same agreement. Facsimile signatures may be relied upon as original signatures. 3. EFFECT. Except as hereby amended, the Continuing Guaranty remains in full force and effect. [Signature Page to Follow] 



​
​



	
	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument as of the date first above written. GUARANTOR: Loding Fund REIT III OP, LP a Delaware Limited partnership By: Loding Fund REIT III, Inc., a Maryland corporation Its: General Partner /s_/_S_a_mu_e_l _Mo_n_tg_o_me_ry By: Name: Samuel C. Montgomery Its: Chief Financial Officer LENDER: EPH Development Fund, LLC a Delaware limited liability company /_s/_A Ke_n_Ok_a_m_o_t_o By: Name: Its: A. Ken Okamoto Authorized Signatory 



​
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2012-LC4 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information requiredto be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities requiredto be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been includedas an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to meby the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, KeyBank National Association,as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, and CoreLogicSolutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

 

 

Dated: March 24, 2022

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
10.3 

 11/08/04 

Page 1 

Quitting Tobacco: Handling Stress ... Without Smoking 

What To Expect 

• After you quit smoking, handling the normal stresses in your life may become more of a 

challenge. 

• Quitting smoking itself is stressful and adds to your stress load. 

Did You Know? 

• Most smokers report that one reason they smoke is to handle stress. 

• You may become more aware of stress during withdrawal. This happens because 

smoking cigarettes actually relieves some of your stress by releasing powerful chemicals 

in your brain. 

• As you go longer without smoking, you will get better at handling stress, especially if 

you learn relaxation techniques. 

Nicotine and Your Body and Mind 

• Everyday worries, responsibilities, and hassles can all contribute to stress. 

• It is thought that once nicotine enters your brain, it stimulates production of a number of 

the brain’s most powerful chemical messengers. 

• These chemicals (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, arginine, vasopressin, betaendorphin, and acetylcholine) are involved in alertness, pain reduction, learning, 

memory, pleasure, and the reduction of both anxiety and pain. 

• When you smoke, your brain chemistry changes temporarily so that you experience 

decreased anxiety, enhanced pleasure, and alert relaxation. This is why it feels good 

when you smoke.

What To Do 

• Know the causes of stress in your life (your job, your children, money). 

• Identify the stress signals (headaches, nervousness, or trouble sleeping). 

• Create peaceful times in your everyday schedule. (For example, set aside an hour where 

you can get away from other people and your usual environment.) 

• Try new relaxation methods and stick with the best one for you. 

• Rehearse and visualize your relaxation plan. Put your plan into action. Change your plan 

as needed. 

• Seek and learn relaxation techniques such as progressive relaxation.
10.3 

 11/08/04 

Page 2 

Related Notes 

• You may find it helpful to visit your library or bookstore to pick up a book about how to 

handle stress. 

How To Get Help 

• If you or someone you know wants help with giving up tobacco, please call the National 

Cancer Institute’s Smoking Quitline toll-free at 1–877–44U–QUIT (1–877–448–7848). 

The information specialists on the Quitline can provide suggestions and support to help 

smokers break the habit. 

• The Federal Government’s Smokefree.gov Web site (http://www.smokefree.gov) allows 

you to choose the help that best fits your needs. You can get immediate assistance: 

o View an online step-by-step cessation guide. 

o Find state quitline telephone numbers. 

o Instant message an expert through NCI’s LiveHelp service. 

o Download, print, or order publications about quitting smoking.

# # # 

This fact sheet was reviewed on 11/08/04

This fact sheet was adapted from material developed by the Tobacco Education and Prevention Program of the 

Arizona Department of Health Services and the Arizona Smokers’ Helpline of the University of Arizona.
### [§9775. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–145, title V, §509(b), Oct. 27, 1971, 85 Stat. 408]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 590, authorized assignment of quarters belonging to United States at an air base or other Air Force installation to officers, grade lieutenant general down to second lieutenant, 10 to 2 rooms, respectively, and prohibited other assignment where quarters existed.
#### § 559.5 Must a tribe notify the Chair if a facility license is terminated or expires or if a gaming place, facility, or location closes or reopens?

A tribe must notify the Chair within 30 days if a facility license is terminated or expires or if a gaming place, facility, or location closes or reopens. A tribe need not provide a notification of seasonal closures or temporary closures with a duration of less than 180 days.
# C_2006326EN.01005802.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/58

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 17 October 2006 — Harry's Morato v OHIM — Ferrero Deutschland (MORATO)

(Case T-52/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Cancellation of the earlier trade mark - No need to adjudicate)

(2006/C 326/126)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Harry's Morato SpA (Altavilla Vicentina, Italy) (represented by: N. Ferretti, G. Casucci and F. Trevisan, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: C. Negro and O. Montaldo, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Ferrero Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt/Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Kefferpütz, lawyer)

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 December 2005 (Case R 600/2005-1), concerning opposition proceedings Harry's Morato SpA and Ferrero Deutschland GmbH.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this case. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this case.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

1

---
### [§2375. Renumbered §3452]
# C_2006281EN.01003702.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/37

---

Action brought on 22 August 2006 — Otto v OHIM — L'Altra Moda (l'Altra Moda)

(Case T-224/06)

(2006/C 281/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Otto (GmbH & Co KG) (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: C. Rohnke and M. Munz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: L'Altra Moda SpA (Rome, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 22 June 2006, docket No R793/2005-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 22 June 2006, docket No R793/2005-2;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: L'Altra Moda SpA.

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘l'Altra Moda’ for goods in classes 3, 18 and 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The national figurative mark ‘Alba Moda’ for goods in class 25

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly considered the conflicting trade marks to be dissimilar.

Pleas in law:

Violation of Article 73 of the regulation as the Board of Appeal did not inform the applicant that it intended to reject the argument of increased distinctiveness and to disregard the applicant's pleading in this regard.

Violation of Article 74 of the regulation as the Board of Appeal did not take the necessary steps to determine the degree of distinctiveness of the trade mark ‘Alba Moda’.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7266

HENRY WATSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. ALLEN, M.D.,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-7388

HENRY WATSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. ALLEN, M.D.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-96-504-BR)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997
2

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Watson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a North Carolina, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act

("PLRA"), Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Watson v. Allen, No. CA-96-504-BR (E.D.N.C. July

30, 1996). We modify the district court's order to reflect that the

dismissal is without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 512 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 229
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 512

                          [Report No. 106-640]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2559) to amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to strengthen 
 the safety net for agricultural producers by providing greater access 
 to more affordable risk management tools and improved protection from 
production and income loss, to improve the efficiency and integrity of 
      the Federal crop insurance program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 24), 2000

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2559) to amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to strengthen 
 the safety net for agricultural producers by providing greater access 
 to more affordable risk management tools and improved protection from 
production and income loss, to improve the efficiency and integrity of 
      the Federal crop insurance program, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2559) to amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to strengthen the safety 
net for agricultural producers by providing greater access to more 
affordable risk management tools and improved protection from 
production and income loss, to improve the efficiency and integrity of 
the Federal crop insurance program, and for other purposes. All points 
of order against the conference report and against its consideration 
are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

                                                 House Calendar No. 229

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 512

                          [Report No. 106-640]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2559) to amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to strengthen 
 the safety net for agricultural producers by providing greater access 
 to more affordable risk management tools and improved protection from 
production and income loss, to improve the efficiency and integrity of 
      the Federal crop insurance program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 24), 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-16 

November 14, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(a) Plans Covered. Requirements of Coverage

4021(b)(12) Plans Covered. Partial Individual Account Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request for a response to the following question raised by Mr. * * * of the * * *: Are

defined benefit plans which are funded exclusively by individual insurance or annuity policies exempt from plan

termination insurance coverage?

Section 4021 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 provides for broad coverage of retirement

plans, with a number of specific exclusions. There is no stated exclusion from coverage for plans which are funded

through insurance or annuity policies issued by private insurance companies. Indeed, it is our understanding that it was

intended by the Congress to include such plans within the termination insurance * * * program. 

The exclusion provided in Section 4021(b)(12) refers to the situation where the plan provides a benefit a portion

of which is defined and a portion of which is the experience of a separate account (as defined in Section 3(17) of the Act)

maintained for the participant. To the extent that the benefit is the product of the separate account, there is no guarantee

and, accordingly, that [*2] portion of the benefit is excluded from coverage. 

We hope this will be of assistance and apologize for the delay in our response. 

Henry Rose 

Acting General Counsel
#### § 169.203 May a right-of-way be renewed multiple times?

There is no prohibition on renewing a right-of-way multiple times, unless the grant expressly prohibits multiple renewals, and subject to the duration limitations for individually owned land in § 169.201. The provisions of § 169.202 apply to each renewal.
### SUBCHAPTER XII—FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES
Fourth Amendment to the AnnTaylor Stores Corporation 2002 Stock Option



 Exhibit 10.9 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 
 THE ANNTAYLOR STORES CORPORATION 
 2002 STOCK OPTION AND RESTRICTED STOCK AND UNIT AWARD PLAN 
 The AnnTaylor Stores
Corporation 2002 Stock Option and Restricted Stock and Unit Award Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended effective as of March 13, 2008 (the “Effective Date”) as set forth below. 
 1. Section 7 of the Plan is hereby amended to add Subsection (h) at the end thereof as follows, effective with respect to all Options (as
defined in the Plan) granted pursuant to the Plan, including outstanding Options granted before the Effective Date: 
 “(h) CERTAIN PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO RESTRICTED UNIT AWARDS. Unless otherwise provided in the Restricted Unit Award Agreement, Restricted Unit Awards shall be settled as soon as practicable following the vesting
thereof (but in no event later than the last day of the ‘applicable 2 1/2 month period’, as such term is defined in
Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-1(b)(4)(i)(A)).” 
 Except as set forth above, the Plan is hereby ratified and affirmed in all
respects.