alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9040. Oversight of nuclear deterrence mission

(a) Oversight of Nuclear Deterrence Mission.—Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force shall be responsible for overseeing the safety, security, reliability, effectiveness, and credibility of the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force.

(b) Deputy Chief of Staff.—Not later than March 1, 2016, the Chief of Staff shall designate a Deputy Chief of Staff to carry out the following duties:

(1) Provide direction, guidance, integration, and advocacy regarding the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force.

(2) Conduct monitoring and oversight activities regarding the safety, security, reliability, effectiveness, and credibility of the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force.

(3) Conduct periodic comprehensive assessments of all aspects of the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force and provide such assessments to the Secretary of the Air Force and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force.

(Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title XVI, §1652(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1121, §8040; renumbered §9040, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(c), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8040 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Barry W. Tackett
Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer

Date: May 21, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

CHARLES BEATTY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 234 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
# C_2013308EN.01000401.xml

| 23.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/4

---

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2012

2013/C 308/04

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.eda.europa.eu/

---
# DATA BOOK LISTING

2016 Data Tables
https://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/2016-single-employer-guaranty-study.pdf

# LISTING(Continued)

2016 Data Tables
https://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/orphan-and-inactive-participant-report-final.pdf

# Overview

2016 Data Tables
http://www.pbgc.gov/prac/data-books.html

# GLANCE

2016 Data Tables

# S-1

2016 Data Tables

# S-2

2016 Data Tables

# S-3

2016 Data Tables

# S-4

2016 Data Tables

# S-5

2016 Data Tables

# S-6

2016 Data Tables

# S-7

2016 Data Tables

# S-8

2016 Data Tables

# S-9

2016 Data Tables

# S-10

2016 Data Tables

# S-11

2016 Data Tables

# S-12

2016 Data Tables

# S-13

2016 Data Tables

# S-14

2016 Data Tables

# S-15

2016 Data Tables

# S-16

2016 Data Tables

# S-17

2016 Data Tables

# S-18

2016 Data Tables

# S-19

2016 Data Tables

# S-20

2016 Data Tables

# S-21

2016 Data Tables

# S-22

2016 Data Tables

# S-23

2016 Data Tables

# S-24

2016 Data Tables

# S-25

2016 Data Tables

# S-26

2016 Data Tables

# S-27

2016 Data Tables

# S-28

2016 Data Tables

# S-29

2016 Data Tables

# S-30

2016 Data Tables

# S-31

2016 Data Tables

# S-32

2016 Data Tables

# S-33

2016 Data Tables

# S-34

2016 Data Tables

# S-35

2016 Data Tables

# S-36

2016 Data Tables

# S-37 

2016 Data Tables

# S-38

2016 Data Tables

# S-39

2016 Data Tables

# S-40

2016 Data Tables

# S-41

2016 Data Tables

# S-42

2016 Data Tables

# S-43

2016 Data Tables

# S-44

2016 Data Tables

# S-45

2016 Data Tables

# S-46

2016 Data Tables

# S-47

2016 Data Tables

# S-48

2016 Data Tables

# S-49

2016 Data Tables

# S-50

2016 Data Tables

# S-51

2016 Data Tables

# S-51(c)

2016 Data Tables

# S-52

2016 Data Tables

# S-53

2016 Data Tables

# M-1

2016 Data Tables

# M-2

2016 Data Tables

# M-3

2016 Data Tables

# M-4

2016 Data Tables

# M-5

2016 Data Tables

# M-6

2016 Data Tables

# M-7

2016 Data Tables

# M-8

2016 Data Tables

# M-9

2016 Data Tables

# M-10

2016 Data Tables

# M-11

2016 Data Tables

# M-12

2016 Data Tables

# M-13

2016 Data Tables

# M-14

2016 Data Tables

# M-15

2016 Data Tables

# M-16

2016 Data Tables

# M-17

2016 Data Tables

# M-18

2016 Data Tables

# M-19

2016 Data Tables

# M-20

2016 Data Tables
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-50 

April 13, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4006 Premium Rates 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of December 2, 1975, asking whether an annuitant is a plan participant for purposes

of Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter "Act"), where Treasury Regulation

§ 1.401-4(c)(2) requires the plan to recover a portion of the value of the retiree's annuity under the circumstances set

out in the Regulation. 

It is our opinion that such a retiree is a plan * * * participant for purposes of Title IV of the Act so long as the

conditions set out in subdivision (ii) of the Regulation may become applicable. As you correctly noted in your letter,

our regulation defines a participant in pertinent part as "a retiree . . . for whom a fully paid-up immediate or deferred

annuity has been purchased . . . if the plan retains a participating interest in the annuity policy." Premium Payment

Regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 2602.2, 40 Fed. Reg. 57458 (Dec. 19, 1975). The plan's contingent right to recover a portion

of the value of the retiree's annuity is such a participating interest. 

We hope that the above answers your question. Should you have additional questions, please feel free to contact

us. 

George B. Driesen [*2] 

Deputy General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998             APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                           2,666                   3,243
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,650                   6,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (197)                   (234)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,305                   8,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,895                  19,658
<PP&E>                                           4,595                   5,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,643)                 (2,565)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,912                  59,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,886                   6,678
<BONDS>                                         90,000                  90,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,478                   9,721
<PREFERRED>                                          0                   9,000
<COMMON>                                            23                      23
<OTHER-SE>                                    (61,494)                (65,866)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,912                  59,561
<SALES>                                         15,881                  14,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,881                  14,993
<CGS>                                            8,619                   8,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,469                   4,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   328                     606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (22)                      29
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,245                   2,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    242                 (1,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        39                   (175)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                203                   (857)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       203                   (857)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
        Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
        Series COMM 2012-LC4 Mortgage Trust (the "Trust")


 I, Helaine M. Kaplan, of Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,
   the depositor into the above-referenced Trust, certify that:

   1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D
        required to be filed in respect of periods covered by this report on
        Form 10-K of the Trust (the "Exchange Act Periodic Reports");

   2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
        whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
        to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
        light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
        misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
        information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
        covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic
        Reports;

   4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
        in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
        disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Report, the servicers have
        fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
        material respects; and

   5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
        for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
        assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
        securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
        Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
        have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
        disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
        described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
        Form 10-K.

   In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
   provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank,
   National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC,
   as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, Deutsche
   Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Deutsche Bank
   Trust Company Americas, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as
   Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as
   Servicing Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing
   Function Participant.


        Date: March 29, 2013

        /s/ Helaine M. Kaplan
        _____________________
            Helaine M. Kaplan
            President
            (senior officer in charge of securitization of depositor)
# C_2006212EN.01002402.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/24

---

Action brought on 4 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-299/06)

(2006/C 212/41)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Zavvos and N.Yerrell)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/92/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/92/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of the directive into domestic law expired on 14 January 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 9, 15.1.2003, p. 3.

1

---
#### Barry Berghold, Jr., Respondent-Appellant, v Ferry Builders, Inc., Appellant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. Daniel R. Gabalski, Doing Business as Dan Gabalski Residential Construction, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 708]

Appeals and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered November 4, 2005. The order, among other things, granted those parts of defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present— Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Scudder, Gorski and Smith, JJ.
# C_2006294EN.01005201.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/52

---

Action brought on 12 September 2006 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-258/06)

(2006/C 294/107)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and C. Schulze-Bahr)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare null and void the Commission's interpretative communication of 23 June 2006 on the Community law applicable to contract awards not or not fully subject to the provisions of the public procurement directives; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare null and void the Commission's interpretative communication of 23 June 2006 on the Community law applicable to contract awards not or not fully subject to the provisions of the public procurement directives; and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant takes issue with the Commission's interpretative communication on the Community law applicable to contract awards not or not fully subject to the provisions of the public procurement directives, which was placed on the Commission's internet website on 24 July 2006 and published in the Official Journal on 1 August 2006 (OJ 2006 C 179, p. 2).

Official Journal

As grounds for its action, the applicant submits that the Commission was not competent to issue the contested communication. It argues in this connection that the contested communication contains new rules on tendering which go beyond the obligations arising under existing Community law. These new rules will have legally binding effects for the Member States. The EC Treaty, however, contains no authorisation which would enable the defendant to adopt such rules. The present case therefore, in the applicant's view, essentially involves an instance of de facto legislation.

de facto

The applicant goes on to contend that, by establishing mandatory rules, the defendant has upset the institutional balance existing between the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission.

In conclusion the applicant submits that, even if the Commission were competent to issue the contested communication, the latter would still have to be declared null and void as the principle of legal certainty has been infringed. The defendant ought to have invoked the appropriate legal basis and made express reference to this in the legal measure in question. The Commission thus also breached the duty to state reasons laid down in Article 253 EC.

---
#### Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Philip Mischler, et al.

This case is controlled by the decision in Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. Bolles, *ante,*p. 242.

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon County; the Hon. James A. Creighton, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the November term, 1903.

Reversed.

Opinion filed April 20, 1905.

Kerrick *&*Bracken, for appellant; George Burnham, Jr., of counsel.

A. G. Murray, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

In this case judgment was rendered by the court below in favor of appellees and against appellant for §420.10, being the amount found to be due upon a certificate of insurance issued to Philip Mischler, June 7, 1879, by the Covenant Mutual Benefit Association, for §2,500. All of the questions involved in this case are considered and determined in the case of Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Chester H. Bolles et al., *ante,*p. 242, and in accordance with the views therein expressed the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed.

*Reversed.*
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Pamphlets of the Women's Bureau

              																			United States. Women's Bureau.				"Nurses and Other Hospital Personnel : Their Earnings and Employment Conditions, Pamphlet 6 (Reprinted 1961 with Supplement),"		*Pamphlets of the Women's Bureau*		(1961).				https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/266/item/5919, accessed on September 22, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 26.33 How do I show I need job training?

The need for Job Placement and Training is shown by completing an application for training that demonstrates financial need.
§ 11.1007 Petition. ( a ) Proceedings under §§ 11.1000-11.1014 of this part shall be instituted by a petition filed by the presenting officer on behalf of the tribe and in the interests of the minor. The petition shall state: ( 1 ) The name, birth date, and residence of the minor;
( 2 ) The names and residences of the minor's parents, guardian or custodian;
( 3 ) A citation to the specific section(s) of this part which gives the children's court jurisdiction of the proceedings;
( 4 ) A citation to the section(s) of this part which the minor is alleged to have violated; and
( 5 ) If the minor is in detention or shelter care, the time the minor was taken into custody.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

LUIS T. GAUTHIER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 189 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
§ 183.4 How can the Tribe use the principal and income from the Trust Fund? The Tribe may use the principal and income from the Trust Fund in the following ways: ( a ) To put to beneficial use the water entitlement provided to the Tribe in the Settlement Act;
( b ) To defray the cost to the Tribe of CAP operation, maintenance, and replacement charges;
( c ) For economic development purposes; provided, however, that principal may only be used for long-term economic development projects and income may be used for other economic and community development purposes; and
( d ) For Administrative Costs reasonably related to the above uses.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
April 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133542 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE KEVIN MICHAEL BEDNAR, Minor.

_____________ _______________ _____________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 133542 COA: 272974 Oakland CC

EDWARD CURANOVIC, Respondent-Appellant. Family Division: 05-703363-NA

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0410 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
April 13, 2007
Clerk