10584 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2011 / Notices 

letters, in the Federal Register. Since 

February 2008, EPA has included its 

comment letters on EISs on its Web site 

at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ 

nepa/eisdata.html. Including the entire 

EIS comment letters on the Web site 

satisfies the Section 309(a) requirement 

to make EPA’s comments on EISs 

available to the public. Accordingly, on 

March 31, 2010, EPA discontinued the 

publication of the notice of availability 

of EPA comments in the Federal 

Register. 

EIS No. 20110044, Draft EIS, FHWA, 

CA, Yerba Buena Island Ramps 

Improvement Project on Interstate 80 

(I–80), Proposals to Replace the 

Existing Westbound on- and off-ramp, 

Funding, San Francisco County, CA, 

Comment Period Ends: 04/11/2011, 

Contact: Greg Kolle 916–498–5852. 

EIS No. 20110045, Final EIS, NRC, ID, 

Eagle Rock Enrichment Facility, 

Construct, Operate, and 

Decommission, Proposed Facility 

would Enrich Uranium for Use in 

Commercial Nuclear Fuel for Power 

Reactors, Bonneville County, ID, 

Review Period Ends: 03/28/2011, 

Contact: Stephen Lemont 301–415– 

5163. 

EIS No. 20110046, Draft Supplement, 

USFS, CA, Salt Timber Harvest and 

Fuel Hazard Reduction Project, 

Additional Analysis and 

Supplemental Information, Proposing 

Vegetation Management in the Salt 

Creek Watershed, South Fork 

Management Unit, Hayfork Ranger 

District, Shasta-Trinity National 

Forest, Trinity County, CA, Comment 

Period Ends: 04/11/2011, Contact: 

Joshua Wilson 530–226–2422. 

EIS No. 20110047, Draft Supplement, 

USN, CA, Hunters Point (Former) 

Naval Shipyard Disposal and Reuse, 

Supplement Information on the 2000 

FEIS, Implementation, City of San 

Francisco, San Francisco County, CA, 

Comment Period Ends: 04/12/2011, 

Contact: Ronald Bochenek 619–532– 

0906. 

EIS No. 20110048, Draft EIS, DOE, 00, 

Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C 

(GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste 

and GTCC–Like Waste, Proposed 

Development, Operation, and LongTerm Management of a Disposal 

Facility, Comment Period Ends: 06/ 

27/2011, Contact: Arnold Edelman 

301–903–7238. 

EIS No. 20110049, Draft EIS, USFWS, 

HI, Palmyra Atoll National Wildlife 

Refuge Rat Eradication Project, 

Proposing to Restore and Protect the 

Native Species and Habitats, 

Implementation, Northern Line 

Islands, Honolulu, HI, Comment 

Period Ends: 04/11/2011, Contact: 

Ben Harrison 503–231–6177. 

EIS No. 20110050, Final EIS, USACE, 

00, Missouri River Commercial 

Dredging, Proposal to Extract Sand 

and Gravel from the Missouri River, 

U.S. Corps of Engineers Section 10 

and 404 Permits, Kansas City, Central 

Missouri and Greater St. Louis, 

Missouri, Review Period Ends: 03/28/ 

2011, Contact: Cody Wheeler 816– 

389–3739. 

EIS No. 20110051, Draft EIS, USN, CA, 

Marine Corps Air Ground Combat 

Center Project, Land Acquisition and 

Airspace Establishment to Support 

Large-Scale MAGTF Live-Fire and 

Maneuver Training Facility, San 

Bernardino County, CA, Comment 

Period Ends: 04/11/2011, Contact: 

Chris Proudfoot 760–830–3764. 

EIS No. 20110052, Draft EIS, USFS, 00, 

PROGRAMMATIC—National Forest 

System Land Management Planning, 

Proposing a New Rule at 36 CFR Part 

219 Guide Development, Revision, 

and Amendment of Land Management 

Plans for Unit of the National Forest 

System, Comment Period Ends: 05/ 

25/2011, Contact: Brenda HalterGlenn 202–260–9400. 

EIS No. 20110053, Final EIS, USACE, 

00, PROGRAMMATIC—Ohio River 

Mainstem System Study, System 

Investment Plan (SIP) for Maintaining 

Safe, Environmentally Sustainable 

and Reliable Navigation on the Ohio 

River, IL, IN, OH, KY, PA and WV, 

Review Period Ends: 03/28/2011, 

Contact: Dr. Hank Jarboe 513–684– 

6050. 

EIS No. 20110054, Revised Draft EIS, 

FTA, CA, Crenshaw Transit Corridor 

Project, Updated Information on a 

New Evaluation of Maintenance Sites, 

Proposals to Improve Transit Services, 

Funding, Los Angeles County 

Metropolitan Transportation 

Authority (LACMTA), Los Angeles 

County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 

04/11/2011, Contact: Ray Tellis 213– 

202–3950. 

Amended Notices 

EIS No. 20100468, Draft EIS, USACE, 

MS, Mississippi River Gulf Outlet 

(MRGO) Ecosystem Restoration Study, 

To Develop a Comprehensive 

Ecosystem Restoration Plan to Restore 

the Lake Borgne, Implementation, LA, 

Comment Period Ends: 03/04/2011, 

Contact: Tammy Gilmore 504–862– 

1002. Revision to FR Notice 12/17/ 

2010: Extending Comment Period 

from 02/14/2011 to 03/04/2011. 

Dated: February 22, 2011. 

Cliff Rader, 

Environmental Protection Specialist, NEPA 

Compliance Division, Office of Federal 

Activities. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4255 Filed 2–24–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0082; FRL–8863–3] 

Notice of Receipt of Several Pesticide 

Petitions Filed for Residues of 

Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various 

Commodities 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

Agency’s receipt of several initial filings 

of pesticide petitions proposing the 

establishment or modification of 

regulations for residues of pesticide 

chemicals in or on various commodities. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 28, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number and the pesticide petition 

number (PP) of interest as shown in the 

body of this document, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

the docket ID number and the pesticide 

petition number of interest as shown in 

the body of this document. EPA’s policy 

is that all comments received will be 

included in the docket without change 

and may be made available on-line at 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information provided, 

unless the comment includes 

information claimed to be Confidential 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2011 / Notices 10585 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through 

regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the docket and made available 

on the Internet. If you submit an 

electronic comment, EPA recommends 

that you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the docket index available 

at http://www.regulations.gov. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either in the 

electronic docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. 

S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South 

Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, 

VA. The hours of operation of this 

Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 

legal holidays. The Docket Facility 

telephone number is (703) 305–5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A 

contact person, with telephone number 

and e-mail address, is listed at the end 

of each pesticide petition summary. You 

may also reach each contact person by 

mail at their Division: Biopesticides and 

Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), 

or Registration Division (7505P), Office 

of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460– 

0001. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 

affected entities may include, but are 

not limited to: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

This listing is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. Other types of 

entities not listed in this unit could also 

be affected. The North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes have been provided to 

assist you and others in determining 

whether this action might apply to 

certain entities. If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

the person listed at the end of the 

pesticide petition summary of interest. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information 

and/or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 

achieve environmental justice, the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of any group, including minority and/or 

low-income populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. To help 

address potential environmental justice 

issues, the Agency seeks information on 

any groups or segments of the 

population who, as a result of their 

location, cultural practices, or other 

factors, may have atypical or 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health impacts or environmental 

effects from exposure to the pesticides 

discussed in this document, compared 

to the general population. 

II. What Action Is the Agency Taking? 

EPA is announcing its receipt of 

several pesticide petitions filed under 

section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, 

and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 

346a, proposing the establishment or 

modification of regulations in 40 CFR 

part 174 or part 180 for residues of 

pesticide chemicals in or on various 

food commodities. EPA has determined 

that the pesticide petitions described in 

this notice contain the data or 

information prescribed in FFDCA 

section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not 

fully evaluated the sufficiency of the 

submitted data at this time or whether 

the data support granting of the 

pesticide petitions. Additional data may 

be needed before EPA can make a final 

determination on these pesticide 

petitions. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a 

summary of each of the petitions that 

are the subject of this notice, prepared 

by the petitioner, is included in a docket 

EPA has created for each rulemaking. 

The docket for each of the petitions is 

available on-line at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

As specified in FFDCA section 

408(d)(3), (21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3)), EPA is 

publishing notice of the petitions so that 

the public has an opportunity to 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
10586 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2011 / Notices 

comment on the requests for the 

establishment or modification of 

regulations for residues of pesticides in 

or on food commodities. Further 

information on the petitions may be 

obtained through the petitions 

summaries referenced in this unit. 

New Tolerances 

1. PP 0E7790. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

0186). Nissan Chemical Industries, Inc., 

3–7–1, Kanda Nishiki-cho, Chiyoda-ku, 

Tokyo, Japan c/o Lewis & Harrison, 122 

C Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, 

DC 20001, proposes to establish 

tolerances in 40 CFR part 180 for 

residues of the fungicide amisulbrom, 3- 

[3-bromo-6-fluoro-2-methyl-H-indol-1-yl 

sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-1H-1,2,4- 

triazole-1-sulfonamide and its 

metabolite IT–4, in or on tomatoes at 0.5 

parts per million (ppm) and tomato, 

paste at 1.2 ppm. The proposed 

tolerances are for tomatoes and its 

processed products treated in Western 

Europe and imported into the United 

States. There will be no U.S. 

registration. Tandem mass 

spectrographic detection (LC/MS/MS) is 

used for determination and 

quantification of amisulbrom. The limit 

of quantitation (LOQ) is 0.01 ppm. The 

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 

Multi-Residue Protocols C and E were 

tested and considered suitable as either 

an enforcement method or as a 

confirmatory method. Contact: Olga 

Odiott, (703) 308–9369, Registration 

Division (7505P), e-mail address: 

odiott.olga@epa.gov. 

2. PP 0E7802. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

1018). Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4), Rutgers, The State 

University of New Jersey, 500 College 

Road East, Suite 201W., Princeton, NJ 

08540, proposes to establish a tolerance 

in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the 

herbicide quizalofop-ethyl (ethyl-2-[4- 

(6-chloroquinoxalin-2-yl 

oxy)phenoxy]propanoate), including its 

metabolites and degradates, in or on 

rapeseed subgroup 20A, except flax, 

seed at 1.0 ppm; gold of pleasure, meal 

at 1.5 ppm; crambe, meal at 1.5 ppm; 

sorghum, grain at 0.2 ppm; sorghum, 

forage at 0.2 ppm; sorghum, stover at 

0.35 ppm; and sorghum, aspirated grain 

at 1.0 ppm. An adequate analytical 

methodology, high-pressure liquid 

chromatography (HPLC) using either 

ultraviolet (UV) or fluorescence 

detection is available for enforcement 

purposes and is available in the Food 

and Drug Administration Pesticide 

Analytical Method Volume II (PAM II, 

Method I). Contact: Laura E. Nollen, 

(703) 305–7390, Registration Division 

(7505P), e-mail address: 

nollen.laura@epa.gov. 

3. PP 0E7804. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

0472). Interregional Research Project 

No. 4 (IR–4), Rutgers, The State 

University of New Jersey, 500 College 

Road East, Suite 201W., Princeton, NJ 

08540, proposes to establish a tolerance 

in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the 

insecticide zeta-cypermethrin, (Scyano(3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl 

(±))(cis-trans 3-(2,2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and 

its inactive R-isomers, in or on avocado; 

papaya; star apple; black sapote; mango; 

sapodilla; canistel; and mamey sapote at 

0.45 ppm. There is a practical analytical 

method for detecting and measuring 

levels of cypermethrin in or on food 

with a limit of detection that allows 

monitoring of food with residues at or 

above the levels set in these tolerances, 

Gas Chromatography with Electron 

Capture Detection (GC/ECD). Contact: 

Andrew Ertman, (703) 308–9367, 

Registration Division (7505P), e-mail 

address: ertman.andrew@epa.gov. 

4. PP 0E7809. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

1017). Interregional Research Project 

No. 4 (IR–4), Rutgers, The State 

University of New Jersey, 500 College 

Road East, Suite 201W., Princeton, NJ 

08540, proposes to establish a tolerance 

in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the 

herbicide rimsulfuron, N-((4,6- 

dimethoxypyrimidin-2- 

yl)aminocarbonyl)-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2- 

pyridinesulfonamide, including its 

metabolites and degradates, in or on 

caneberry, subgroup 13–07A at 0.01 

ppm; and bushberry, subgroup 13–07B 

at 0.01 ppm. Adequate analytical 

methodology, HPLC with electrospray 

ionization tandem mass spectrometry 

(ESI–MS/MS) detection, is available for 

enforcement purposes. Contact: Sidney 

C. Jackson, (703) 305–7610, Registration 

Division (7505P), e-mail address: 

jackson.sidney@epa.gov. 

5. PP 0F7763. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

0888). E. I. DuPont de Nemours and 

Company, DuPont Crop Protection, 1700 

Market St., Wilmington, DE 19898, 

proposes to establish a tolerance in 40 

CFR part 180 for residues of the 

insecticide chlorantraniliprole, 3- 

bromo-N-[4-chloro-2-methyl-6- 

[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-1-(3- 

chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5- 

carboxamide, in or on bushberry, 

subgroup 13–07B at 2.5 ppm; large 

shrub/tree berry, subgroup 13–07C at 

2.5 ppm; low growing berry, subgroup 

13–07G at 2.5 ppm; ti palm, roots at 0.35 

ppm; ti palm, leaves at 13 ppm; root and 

tuber vegetables, group 1 at 0.35 ppm; 

leaves of root and tuber vegetables, 

group 2 at 40 ppm; sugar beet molasses 

at 11 ppm; onion, bulb, subgroup 3–07A 

at 0.35 ppm; peanut, nutmeat at 0.35 

ppm; peanut, hay at 90 ppm; tea, dried 

leaves at 50 ppm and to increase 

tolerances in or on fruiting vegetables 

(except cucurbits), group 8 from 0.70 

ppm to 0.90 ppm; cucurbit vegetables, 

group 9 from 0.25 ppm to 0.30 ppm; and 

okra from 0.70 ppm to 0.90 ppm. 

Spectrometry is available to enforce the 

proposed tolerances. Contact: Rita 

Kumar, (703) 308–8291, Registration 

Division (7505P), e-mail address: 

kumar.rita@epa.gov. 

6. PP 0F7783. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

0968). Valent U.S.A. Corporation, 1600 

Riviera Avenue, Suite 200, Walnut 

Creek, CA 94596, proposes to establish 

a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for 

residues of the insecticide etoxazole, 2- 

(2,6-difluorophenyl)-4-[4-(1,1- 

dimethylethyl)-2-ethoxyphenyl]-4,5- 

dihydrooxazole, in or on corn, field, 

grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, field, forage at 

0.6 ppm; corn, field, stover at 2.5 ppm; 

corn, field, refined oil at 0.03 ppm; corn, 

pop, grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, pop, stover 

at 2.5 ppm; poultry, fat at 0.01 ppm; and 

poultry, liver at 0.02 ppm. Adequate 

enforcement methodology gas 

chromatography/mass spectrometry 

detection (GC/MSD) for detecting and 

measuring levels of etoxazole is 

available to enforce proposed tolerances 

in/on corn raw and processed 

commodities. Gas chromatography/ 

nitrogen phosphorus detection (GC/ 

NPD) enforcement methodology is also 

available to enforce proposed livestock 

commodity tolerances. Contact: Autumn 

Metzger, (703) 305–5314, Registration 

Division (7505P), e-mail address: 

metzger.autumn@epa.gov. 

7. PP 0F7805. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

1079). Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., 

Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., P.O. Box 

18300, Greensboro, NC, 27419, proposes 

to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 

180 for residues of the insecticide 

thiamethoxam (CAS Reg. No. 153719– 

23–4), 3-[(2-chloro-5- 

thiazolyl)methyl]tetrahydro-5-methyl-Nnitro-4H-1,3,5-oxadiazin-4-imine and its 

metabolite, N-(2-chloro-thiazol-5- 

ylmethyl)-N’-methyl-N’-nitro-guanidine, 

in or on grain, cereal, group 15, except 

barley and corn at 0.02 ppm. Syngenta 

Crop Protection, Inc., has submitted 

practical analytical methodology for 

detecting and measuring levels of 

thiamethoxam in or on raw agricultural 

commodities. This method is based on 

crop specific cleanup procedures and 

determination by liquid 

chromatography with either UV or MS 

detections. The limit of detection (LOD) 

for each analyte of this method is 1.25 

nanograms (ng) injected for samples 

analyzed by UV and 0.25 ng injected for 

samples analyzed by MS, and the limit 

of quantification (LOQ) is 0.005 ppm for 

milk and juices, and 0.01 ppm for all 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2011 / Notices 10587 

other substrates. Contact: Kable Bo 

Davis, (703) 306–0415, Registration 

Division (7505P), e-mail address: 

davis.kable@epa.gov. 

Amended Tolerance 

PP 0E7802. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

1018). Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4), Rutgers, The State 

University of New Jersey, 500 College 

Road East, Suite 201W., Princeton, NJ 

08540, proposes to amend the tolerance 

in 40 CFR 180.441 for residues of the 

herbicide quizalofop-ethyl (ethyl-2-[4- 

(6-chloroquinoxalin-2-yl 

oxy)phenoxy]propanoate), including its 

metabolites and degradates, by 

removing the established tolerance for 

canola, seed at 1.0 ppm from the table 

in paragraph (a)(3) upon the approval of 

the aforementioned tolerances under 

Unit II. ‘‘New Tolerance’’, as the 

individual tolerance will be superseded 

by inclusion in rapeseed subgroup 20A, 

except flax, seed. The petition also 

proposes to remove section (a)(4), as 

these tolerances expired on June 14, 

1999. 

The petition, PP 0E7802, also 

proposes to amend the tolerances in 40 

CFR part 180.441 by combining the 

tables for sections (a)(1) and (a)(3) into 

one table under section (a)(1), and by 

removing section (a)(3). The petition 

further proposes to revise the tolerance 

expression under section (a)(1) to read 

as follows: ‘‘Tolerances are established 

for residues of the herbicide quizalofop 

ethyl, including its metabolites and 

degradates, in or on the commodities in 

the table below. Compliance with the 

tolerance levels specified below is to be 

determined by measuring only those 

quizalofop ethyl residues convertible to 

2-methoxy-6-chloroquinoxaline, 

expressed as the stoichiometric 

equivalent of quizalofop ethyl, in or on 

the commodity.’’ 

The petition, PP 0E7802, additionally 

proposes to revise the tolerance 

expression under section (a)(2) to read 

as follows: ‘‘Tolerances are established 

for residues of the herbicide quizalofop 

ethyl, including its metabolites and 

degradates, in or on the commodities in 

the table below. Compliance with the 

tolerance levels specified below is to be 

determined by measuring only those 

quizalofop ethyl residues convertible to 

quizalofop (2-[4-(6-chloroquinoxalin-2- 

yl-oxy)phenoxy]propanoic acid), 

expressed as quizalofop, in or on the 

commodity.’’ 

Finally, the petition proposes to 

revise the tolerance expression under 

section (c) to read as follows: 

‘‘Tolerances with regional registrations. 

Tolerances with regional registration are 

established for residues of the herbicide 

quizalofop ethyl, including its 

metabolites and degradates, in or on the 

commodities in the table below. 

Compliance with the tolerance levels 

specified below is to be determined by 

measuring only those quizalofop ethyl 

residues convertible to 2-methoxy-6- 

chloroquinoxaline, expressed as the 

stoichiometric equivalent of quizalofop 

ethyl, in or on the commodity.’’ Contact: 

Laura E. Nollen, (703) 305–7390, 

Registration Division (7505P), e-mail 

address: nollen.laura@epa.gov. 

New Tolerance Exemptions 

1. PP 0E7697. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

0271). Novozymes, North America, Inc., 

P.O. Box 576, 77 Perry Chapel Church 

Road, Franklinton, NC 27525, proposes 

to establish an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance for residues 

of lipase, triacylglycerol (CAS Reg. No. 

9001–62–1), under 40 CFR 180.950 

when used as an inert ingredient in 

pesticide formulations as an aid in the 

removal of lipids when used in contact 

surface sanitizers. The petitioner 

believes no analytical method is needed 

because this petition is a request for an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance without numerical limitations. 

Contact: Elizabeth Fertich, (703) 347– 

8560, Registration Division (7505P), email address: fertich.elizabeth@epa.gov. 

2. PP 0F7778. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2011– 

0012). Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., 

EPA Company No. 84059, 2121 Second 

St., Suite B–107, Davis, CA 95618, 

proposes to establish an exemption from 

the requirement of a tolerance for 

residues of the biological insecticide, 

Burkholderia sp strain A396, under 40 

CFR part 180 in or on all agricultural 

commodities. An analytical method for 

detecting and measuring the levels of 

the pesticide residue for Burkholderia 

sp strain A396 is not applicable. It is 

expected that when used as proposed, 

Burkholderia sp strain A396 would not 

result in residues that are of 

toxicological concern. Contact: Anna 

Gross, (703) 305–5614, Biopesticides 

and Pollution Prevention Division 

(7511P), e-mail address: 

gross.anna@epa.gov. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, 

Agricultural commodities, Feed 

additives, Food additives, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: February 11, 2011. 

Daniel J. Rosenblatt, 

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office 

of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4142 Filed 2–24–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–1017; FRL–8863–4] 

Product Cancellation Order for Certain 

Pesticide Registrations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA’s 

order for the cancellations, voluntarily 

requested by the registrants and 

accepted by the Agency, of the products 

listed in Tables 1, 2, and 3 of Unit II., 

pursuant to section 6(f)(1) of the Federal 

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 

Act (FIFRA), as amended. This 

cancellation order follows the 

November 10, 2010 and November 17, 

2010 Federal Register Notices of 

Receipt of Requests from the registrants 

listed in Table 4 of Unit II. to 

voluntarily cancel these product 

registrations. In these notices, EPA 

indicated that it would issue an order 

implementing the cancellations, unless 

the Agency received substantive 

comments within the 30-day comment 

period that would merit its further 

review of these requests, or unless the 

registrants withdrew their requests. The 

Agency received comments on the 

November 10, 2010 notice but none 

merited its further review of the 

requests. Accordingly, EPA hereby 

issues in this notice a cancellation order 

granting the requested cancellations. 

Any distribution, sale, or use of the 

products subject to this cancellation 

order is permitted only in accordance 

with the terms of this order, including 

any existing stocks provisions. 

DATES: The cancellations are effective as 

noted in Unit IV. of this cancellation 

order. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maia Tatinclaux, Pesticide Reevaluation Division (7508P), Office of 

Pesticide Programs, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460– 

0001; telephone number: (703) 347– 

0123; fax number: (703) 308–8090; email address: tatinclaux.maia@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, and 

agricultural advocates; the chemical 

industry; pesticide users; and members 

of the public interested in the sale, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES