alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.2
(logo) FIRST REPUBLIC BANK
It's a privilege to serve you

Feb 28, 2013

Servicer Compliance Statement
For SEMT 2012-2 (see Schedule A)


(i)a review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period from
January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 and of its performance under the
Agreement (each of the agreement and the Reconstitution Agreement as defined on
Schedule A attached hereto) from the above referenced trust during such period
has been made under such officer's supervision, and

(ii)to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the
Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement and any
applicable Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects throughout such
reporting period (or applicable portion thereof) or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifically
identifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and the
status thereof.

First Republic Bank

/s/ Tony Sachs
Tony Sachs
Vice President
February 28, 2013

SCHEDULE A

1.Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010,
between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as
modified by Reconstitution Agreement dated March 29, 2012

San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego
Portland  Boston  Greenwich  New York


111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR
(800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413

CONVENIENT INTERNET BANKING AT www.firstrepublic.com * MEMBER FDIC
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 11.1

                                24/7 MEDIA, INC.

                        Calculation of net loss per share

                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Three Months Ended September 30         Nine Months Ended September 30
                                         -------------------------------------   ----------------------------------
                                                1999               1998               1999              1998
                                         -------------------  ----------------   ---------------   ----------------
<S>                                      <C>                  <C>                <C>                <C>
Net Loss ............................      $(11,668,000)      $ (6,002,000)      $(26,075,000)      $(18,375,000)

Cumulative Dividends on manditorily
convertible preferred stock .........                --            (90,000)                --           (276,000)
                                           ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------

Net loss applicable to common
          stockholders ..............      $(11,668,000)      $ (6,092,000)      $(26,075,000)      $(18,651,000)
                                           ============       ============       ============       ============

Total weighted average shares
          outstanding ...............        21,103,871         12,452,876         19,202,112          8,325,812
                                           ============       ============       ============       ============

Basic and diluted net loss per  share      $      (0.55)      $      (0.49)      $      (1.36)      $      (2.24)
                                           ============       ============       ============       ============
</TABLE>

                                        33
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micro Interconnect
Technology, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter period ended September 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Yulong
Wan, Chief Financial Officer of Micro Interconnect Technology, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Micro Interconnect Technology, Inc. as of and for the period covered by the
Report.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

November 15, 2004                       /s/ Yulong Wan
                                        Yulong Wan
                                        Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 558 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 19, 2000.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable Paul Coverdell, a Senator from the State of Georgia.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That a committee be appointed on the part of the House to join a 
committee appointed on the part of the Senate to attend the funeral.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased Senator.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### §743. Notice

The clerk shall give the notice required by section 342 of this title to SIPC and to the Commission.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2613; Pub. L. 99–554, title II, §283(t), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3118; Pub. L. 103–394, title V, §501(d)(27), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4146.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

Section 743 requires that notice of the order for relief be given to SIPC and to the SEC in every stockbroker case.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–394 substituted "342" for "342(a)".

1986—Pub. L. 99–554, which directed the amendment of this section by striking "(d)", rather than "(a)", could not be executed because "(d)" did not appear in text. See 1994 Amendment note above.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### § 81.3 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in this part are approved by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), and has been assigned OMB control number 1076-0183. This information is collected when, under Federal statute or the tribe's governing documents, the Secretarial election is authorized to adopt, amend, or revoke governing documents; or adopt or amend charters. This information is required to obtain or retain benefits. A Federal agency may not collect or sponsor an information collection without a valid OMB control number.
#### § 292.25 Do information collections in this part have Office of Management and Budget approval?

The information collection requirements in §§ 292.16, 292.17, and 292.18 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The information collection control number is 1076-0158. A Federal agency may not collect or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         321,183
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  578,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                    298,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,121,854
<PP&E>                                       5,303,622
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,786,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,859,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,031,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,028
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,030,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,859,053
<SALES>                                        773,641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               781,117
<CGS>                                          439,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  983,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             324,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (522,757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (522,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (522,757)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.024)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                      CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  KeySpan   Corporation   (the
"Corporation")  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
B. Catell,  Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer of the  Corporation,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                     /s/ Robert B. Catell
                                     --------------------
                                     Name: Robert B. Catell
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                     Date: November 5, 2003
### §2246. Authorization of certain support for military service academy foundations

(a) Authority.—Subject to subsection (b) and pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Superintendent of a Service Academy may authorize a covered foundation to use, on an unreimbursed basis, facilities or equipment of such Service Academy.

(b) Limitations.—Use of facilities or equipment under subsection (a) may be provided only if such use—

(1) is without any liability of the United States to the covered foundation;

(2) does not affect the ability of any official or employee of the military department concerned, or any member of the armed forces, to carry out any responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner;

(3) does not compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the military department concerned, or any individual involved in such a program;

(4) does not include the participation of any cadet or midshipman, other than participation in an honor guard at an event of the covered foundation;

(5) complies with the Joint Ethics Regulation; and

(6) has been reviewed and approved by an attorney of the military department concerned.

(c) Briefing.—In any fiscal year during which the Superintendent of a Service Academy exercises the authority under subsection (a), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall provide a briefing not later than the last day of that fiscal year to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives regarding the number of events or activities of a covered foundation supported by such exercise during such fiscal year.

(d) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "covered foundation" means a charitable, educational, or civic nonprofit organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, that the Secretary concerned determines operates exclusively to support, with respect to a Service Academy, any of the following:

(A) Recruiting.

(B) Parent or alumni development.

(C) Academic, leadership, or character development.

(D) Institutional development.

(E) Athletics.

(2) The term "Service Academy" has the meaning given such term in section 347 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title V, §551(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2591.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (d)(1), is classified to section 501(c)(3) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title V, §551(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2591, which directed amendment of this subchapter by inserting this section "after section 2245 the end", was executed by inserting this section after section 2245 of this title to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2246 of this title was renumbered section 2491a of this title.
### §953. Remission or suspension of sentence; restoration to duty; reenlistment

For offenders who were at the time of commission of their offenses subject to his authority and who merit such action, the Secretary concerned shall establish—

(1) a system for the remission or suspension of the unexecuted part of the sentences of selected offenders;

(2) a system for the restoration to duty of such offenders who have had the unexecuted part of their sentences remitted or suspended and who have not been discharged; and

(3) a system for the enlistment of such offenders who have had the unexecuted part of their sentences remitted and who have been discharged.

(Added Pub. L. 90–377, §1, July 5, 1968, 82 Stat. 287.)
#### § 720.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 720.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
§ 276.6 Program income. ( a ) No grantee receiving a grant shall be held accountable for interest earned on grant funds, pending their disbursement for program purposes.
( b ) Proceeds from the sale of real or personal property, either provided by the Federal Government or purchased in whole or in part with Federal funds, shall be handled in accordance with § 276.11.
( c ) Royalties received from copyrights and patents produced under the grant during the grant period shall be retained by the grantee and, in accordance with the grant agreement, be either added to the funds already committed to the program or deducted from total allowable project costs for the purpose of determining the net costs on which the Bureau share of costs will be based. After termination or completion of the grant, the Bureau share of royalties in excess of $200 received annually shall be returned to the Bureau in the absence of other specific agreements between the Bureau and the grantee. The Bureau share of royalties shall be computed on the same ratio basis as the Bureau share of the total project cost.
( d ) All other program income earned during the grant period shall be retained by the grantee and, in accordance with the grant agreement, shall be either: ( 1 ) Added to funds committed to the project by the Bureau and the grantee and be used to further eligible program objectives, or
( 2 ) Deducted from the total project costs for the purpose of determining the net costs on which the Bureau share of costs will be based.
( e ) Grantees shall record the receipt and expenditures of revenues (such as taxes, special assessments, levies, fines, etc.) as a part of grant project transactions when such revenues are specifically earmarked for a grant project in accordance with grant agreements.
### [§490. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, §1061(10)(A), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1583]

Section, added Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IX, §912(a), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 280; amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, §1073(a)(6), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2472, related to management of space cadre personnel and submission of a biennial report.
### §2200d. Regulations

The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IX, §922(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–236.)
### -90 -85 -80 -75

35 40 45



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 1000 1500 2000 1000 18 12 06 00 06/29 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
§ 293.27 What factors will the Secretary analyze to determine if revenue sharing is lawful? ( a ) A compact or amendment may include provisions that address revenue sharing in exchange for a State's meaningful concessions resulting in a substantial economic benefit for the Tribe.
( b ) The Department reviews revenue sharing provisions with great scrutiny beginning with the presumption that a Tribe's payment to a State or local government for anything beyond § 293.18 regulatory fee is a prohibited “tax, fee, charge, or other assessment.” In order for the Department to approve revenue sharing the parties must show through documentation, such as a market study or other similar evidence, that: ( 1 ) The Tribe has requested and the State has offered specific meaningful concessions the State was otherwise not required to negotiate;
( 2 ) The value of the specific meaningful concessions offered by the State provides substantial economic benefits to the Tribe in a manner justifying the revenue sharing required by the compact; and
( 3 ) The Tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming measured by projected revenue to the Tribe against projected revenue shared with the State.
( c ) The inclusion of revenue sharing provisions to the State that is not justified by meaningful concessions of substantial economic benefit to the Tribe may be considered evidence of a violation of IGRA.
COUNTY OF VICTORIA 

DONALD R. POZZI p n ^. 

COUNTY JUDGE ' ' " -

5 O j?: 9K 

April 24, 2012 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

W86-472 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Martin, 

Victoria Regional Airport would like to request a fourteen (14) day extension to the 

Essential Air Service proposal deadline. We have been diligently contacting prospective 

carriers and have recently had a meeting with a desired carrier. We respectfully request 

the deadline to be moved from April 25 to May 9, 2012. Having this added time will go 

a long way in allowing these prospective carriers the time to fully research our market 

and confirm that providing service to Victoria Regional Airport will be mutually 

beneficial to both themselves and our community. 

Sincerely, 

Donald R. Pozzi 

County Judge 

Victoria County 

County Courthouse • /O/ .V. IhUlge. Room 102 • lictoi-ia. TX 77901 » (361 f 575-455H » FAX(361) 573-7585 

(Ipozzi'ttvci.x.ofg
### Capital Stock of Federal Land Banks
Summary of Meeting Between the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and EPA Staff

September 15, 201 1

List of Attendees

Erika Farris, EPA

Jeremy Bauer, EPA

Greg Schaner, EPA

Ty Asfaw, NAHB

Jeff Augello, NAHB

Michael Mittelholzer, NAHB

Susan Asmus, NAHB

Connie Bosma, EPA

Jesse Pritts, EPA

Pete Ford, EPA

Summary of Meeting

During the meeting, the following issues were discussed:

EPA provided an update on the status of the new permit;

NAHB shared concerns about the implementation of the non

- numeric EL Gs in the permit;

NAHB provided recommendations for simplifying the CGP, including:

o Adoption of a single lot permit;

o Development of a “no

- discharge” certification; and

o Expansion of the use of a qualifying local program.

NAHB shared concerns about the propo sed water

- quality based effluent limits.
#### § 700.259 Records subject to Privacy Act.

The Privacy Act applies to all “records” as that term is defined in § 700.257(d), which the Commission maintains in a “system of records,” as that term is defined in § 700.257(e).
# C_2006249EN.01001102.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/11

---

Action brought on 4 August 2006 — Euro-Information v OHIM (word mark ‘CYBERCREDIT’)

(Case T-211/06)

(2006/C 249/29)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Européenne de traitement de l'information SAS (Euro-Information) (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Jacquet, J. Schouman and P. Greffe, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annulment in its entirety of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 June 2006, Case R 66/2006-1, which refused to register ‘CYBERCREDIT’ as a Community trade mark, under application No 4 114 336, in respect of all the goods and services applied for in Classes 9, 36 and 38; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment in its entirety of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 June 2006, Case R 66/2006-1, which refused to register ‘CYBERCREDIT’ as a Community trade mark, under application No 4 114 336, in respect of all the goods and services applied for in Classes 9, 36 and 38;

| — | registration of ‘CYBERCREDIT’ as a Community trade mark, under application No 4 114 336, in respect of all the goods and services applied for. |
| --- | --- |

—

registration of ‘CYBERCREDIT’ as a Community trade mark, under application No 4 114 336, in respect of all the goods and services applied for.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘CYBERCREDIT’ in respect of goods and services in Classes 9, 36 and 38 (application No 4 114 336)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal to register

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant claims that, contrary to the finding of the Board of Appeal of OHIM in the contested decision, its mark is arbitrary and is sufficiently distinctive in relation to the goods and services applied for to meet the requirements of Council Regulation No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---