alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 642

To honor Drs. Eric R. Kandel and Paul Greengard for being awarded the

Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for 2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 18, 2000

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. RANGEL, and Mrs.

MALONEY of New York) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

RESOLUTION

To honor Drs. Eric R. Kandel and Paul Greengard for

being awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

for 2000, and for other purposes.

Whereas on October 9, 2000, the Nobel Assembly at the

Karolinska Institute awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for 2000 to Drs. Eric R. Kandel and

Paul Greengard for their pioneering discoveries in the

field of neuroscience;

Whereas such discoveries have been crucial for achieving a

fuller understanding of the normal function of the brain

and the mechanisms by which brain cells communicate

with each other at the molecular level to create moods

and memories in individuals;
2

•HRES 642 IH

Whereas the World Health Organization has found that 4 of

the 10 leading causes of disability for persons age 5 and

older are mental disorders;

Whereas schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, and other mental disorders affect nearly

1 in 5 people in the United States each year;

Whereas the work of Drs. Kandel and Greengard has laid a

foundation for the development of drugs and other treatments for mental illnesses and neurological disorders that

promise to be more effective and to have fewer or less

acute side effects; and

Whereas the National Institutes of Health contributed to advances in the field of neuroscience by providing grants

and research support to Drs. Kandel and Greengard for

a period exceeding 30 years: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes and honors Drs. Eric R. Kandel

3 and Paul Greengard for their cumulative achieve4 ments in advancing scientific understanding in the

5 field of neuroscience;

6 (2) expresses support for the ongoing efforts of

7 the National Institutes of Health to fund and assist

8 researchers in developing treatments for mental ill9 nesses and neurological disorders; and

10 (3) expresses support for efforts to promote

11 mental health for all people in the United States

12 through advances in science and overcoming societal
3

•HRES 642 IH

1 attitudes, fears, and misunderstandings concerning

2 mental illness.

Æ
§ 20.304 When will the Bureau review eligibility for General Assistance? The Bureau will review eligibility for General Assistance: ( a ) Every 3 months for individuals who are not exempt from seeking or accepting employment in accordance with § 20.315 or the ISP;
( b ) Every 6 months for all recipients; and
( c ) Whenever there is a change in status that can affect a recipient's eligibility or amount of assistance. Recipients must immediately inform the social services office of any such changes.
# C_2006326EN.01005401.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/54

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 November 2006 — Nanjing Metalink v Council

(Case T-138/02) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of ferro molybdenum originating in China - Revocation of market economy treatment - Article 2(7)(b) and (c) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96)

(2006/C 326/115)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nanjing Metalink International Co. Ltd (Nanjing, China) (represented by: P. Waer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Marquardt, assisted by G.M. Berrisch, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. Scharf and S. Meany, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Annulment of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 215/2002 of 28 January 2002 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of ferro molybdenum originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ 2002 L 35, p. 1), in so far as it imposes an anti-dumping duty on imports of ferro molybdenum produced by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 169, 13.7.2002.

1

---
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**Certificatepursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GB&T Bancshares, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard A. Hunt, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, tothe best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard A. Hunt                      |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer |
|                                     |
|                                     |
| May 14, 2003                             |

 

1

----
### [§2410. Renumbered §3862]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2410, added Pub. L. 100–370, §1(h)(2), July 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 847, provided that contract claims, requests for equitable adjustments, requests for relief under section 1431 et seq. of Title 50, War and National Defense, and other similar requests by contractors exceeding $100,000 were not to be paid unless senior official of contractor certified that claim or request was made in good faith and that data submitted was accurate and complete to the best of such official's knowledge and belief, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VIII, §813(b), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2453, effective upon promulgation of regulations pursuant to former section 2410e of this title [Interim rules, effective Apr. 30, 1993, were promulgated and published in the Federal Register, 58 F.R. 28458, May 13, 1993, and final rules, effective May 27, 1994, were promulgated and published in the Federal Register, 59 F.R. 27662, May 27, 1994].
# C_2006261EN.01003201.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/32

---

(2006/C )

(2006/C 261/65)

On 20 September 2006, in accordance with Article 4 of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice and Article 12 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, the Civil Service Tribunal decided to maintain in force until 30 September 2007 the following conditions for the assignment of cases to chambers:

| — | the First Chamber shall hear all cases, with the exception of those principally concerning questions of recruitment, assessment/promotion and final termination of service, which shall be heard by the Second Chamber; |
| --- | --- |

—

the First Chamber shall hear all cases, with the exception of those principally concerning questions of recruitment, assessment/promotion and final termination of service, which shall be heard by the Second Chamber;

| — | a number of cases shall be assigned to the Third Chamber, regardless of the subject-matter involved, at regular intervals to be determined at a plenary meeting of the Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

—

a number of cases shall be assigned to the Third Chamber, regardless of the subject-matter involved, at regular intervals to be determined at a plenary meeting of the Tribunal;

| — | derogations from the above rules on assignment may be made for reasons of connections between cases and to ensure a balanced and reasonably varied workload within the Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

—

derogations from the above rules on assignment may be made for reasons of connections between cases and to ensure a balanced and reasonably varied workload within the Tribunal.

---
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 341

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death

of Senator John H. Chafee.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 1999

Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island submitted the following resolution; was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives

on the death of Senator John H. Chafee.

1 Resolved, That the House has heard with profound

2 sorrow of the death of the Honorable John H. Chafee,

3 a Senator from the State of Rhode Island.

4 Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolu5 tions to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the

6 family of the deceased.

7 Resolved, That a committee be appointed on the part

8 of the House to join a committee appointed on the part

9 of the Senate to attend the funeral.
2

•HRES 341 ATH

1 Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it ad2 journ as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

3 deceased Senator.

Æ
# C_2006261EN.01001702.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'Etat (Belgium) lodged on 15 September 2006 — Clear Channel Belgium S.A. v City of Liège

(Case C-378/06)

(2006/C 261/32)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d'Etat (Belgium)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Clear Channel Belgium S.A.

Applicant:

Defendant: City of Liège

Defendant:

Intervener: J.-C. Decaux Belgium S.A.

Intervener:

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a contract classified as a ‘licence in respect of public land’ exclude the application of Council Directive 92/50/EEC (1) of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, where, notwithstanding the award by the municipal authority to the contractor of the exclusive right to exploit for profit advertising space on street furniture supplied to the municipal authority, the contract requires the contractor to supply a number of services for the benefit of the authority (provision of street furniture, and of space for municipal posters)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a contract classified as a ‘licence in respect of public land’ exclude the application of Council Directive 92/50/EEC (1) of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, where, notwithstanding the award by the municipal authority to the contractor of the exclusive right to exploit for profit advertising space on street furniture supplied to the municipal authority, the contract requires the contractor to supply a number of services for the benefit of the authority (provision of street furniture, and of space for municipal posters)?

1

| 2. | Where there is no price in the classic sense of that term, may the valuable consideration for the services supplied to the municipal authority consist in the waiver by the authority of advertising revenue from which the financial payments and contributions in kind and display fees provided for in the contract are, as in this case, to be deducted? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Where there is no price in the classic sense of that term, may the valuable consideration for the services supplied to the municipal authority consist in the waiver by the authority of advertising revenue from which the financial payments and contributions in kind and display fees provided for in the contract are, as in this case, to be deducted?

| 3. | Does the principal or ancillary nature of the various obligations provided for in the contract have any relevance to the application of the aforementioned directive? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the principal or ancillary nature of the various obligations provided for in the contract have any relevance to the application of the aforementioned directive?

---

(1)  OJ L 209, 24.07.1992, p. 1.

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER IX–C—NATIONAL INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Record of Discussion _ 

## -:wts-,(._t-oo"J -

# AO Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA bas t his action b een discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DAT E TOPICS DISCUSSED 

### M7 Aerospace LLC Conan Fox 1/2 7 /2 015 Concur. Other/ Additionallnf onnation:

11
#### § 170.620 How do ISDEAA's Indian preference provisions apply?

This section applies when the Secretary or a Tribe enters into a cooperative, reimbursable, or other agreement with a State or local government for a TTP construction project. The Tribe and the parties may choose to incorporate the provisions of section 7(b) of ISDEAA in the agreement.
# C_2006294EN.01003606.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/36

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-42/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/69)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.03.2006.

1

---
### §1430b. Advances to nonmember mortgagee; terms and conditions

#### (a) In general

Each Federal Home Loan Bank is authorized to make advances to nonmember mortgagees approved under title II of the National Housing Act [12 U.S.C. 1707 et seq.]. Such mortgagees must be chartered institutions having succession and subject to the inspection and supervision of some governmental agency, and whose principal activity in the mortgage field must consist of lending their own funds. Such advances shall not be subject to the other provisions and restrictions of this chapter, but shall be made upon the security of insured mortgages, insured under title II of the National Housing Act. Advances made under the terms of this section shall be at such rates of interest and upon such terms and conditions as shall be determined by the Director, but no advance may be for an amount in excess of 90 per centum of the unpaid principal of the mortgage loan given as security.

#### (b) Exception

An advance made to a State housing finance agency for the purpose of facilitating mortgage lending that benefits individuals and families that meet the income requirements set forth in section 142(d) or 143(f) of title 26, need not be collateralized by a mortgage insured under title II of the National Housing Act [12 U.S.C. 1707 et seq.] or otherwise, if—

(1) such advance otherwise meets the requirements of this subsection; and

(2) such advance meets the requirements of section 1430(a) of this title, and any real estate collateral for such loan comprises single family or multifamily residential mortgages.

(July 22, 1932, ch. 522, §10b, as added May 25, 1935, ch. 150, §7, 49 Stat. 295; amended Pub. L. 101–73, title VII, §701(b)(1), (3)(A), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 412; Pub. L. 102–550, title XIII, §1392(b), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4009; Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title II, §1204(8), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2786.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Housing Act, referred to in text, is act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, 48 Stat. 1246. Title II of the Act is classified generally to subchapter II (§1707 et seq.) of chapter 13 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1701 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–289 substituted "the Director" for "the Board".

1992—Pub. L. 102–550 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 substituted "Board" for "Federal Home Loan Bank Board".
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-56 

April 21, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(a) Plans Covered. Requirements of Coverage 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of January 30, 1976, supplemented by Mr * * * letter of February 25, 1976,

requesting this Corporation's opinion on certain * * * proposed actions concerning an unnamed pension plan (hereinafter

"Plan"). Your letter states that the Plan documents were signed in August, 1973, and that an initial payment of * * *

$15,000 was made to an insurance company in 1973, but that no payments were made for 1974 or 1975. Your letter

further states that the Plan has not been officially communicated to potential Plan participants and that a request for a

determination letter was not submitted to the Internal Revenue Service. 

Section 4021(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter "Act") provides that one of

the prerequisites for coverage under Title IV of the Act is that the pension plan is or has been determined to be a plan

described in § § 401(a) or 404(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. One of the requirements of such a plan is

that the plan must be communicated to eligible participants. Treas. Reg. § 1.401-1(a)(2) (1975). If, as you indicated,

* * * there was no such [*2] communication, then the Plan could not * * * have been tax qualified and, therefore, the

Plan would not be covered under Title IV of the Act. 

We hope this answers your question. Should you desire a more detailed review and response, please do not hesitate

to contact us. 

George B. Driesen 

Deputy General Counsel
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03807

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03807\03807_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03807\03807_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03807\03807_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03807\03807_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03807\03807_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03807\03807_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03807\03807_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03807\03807_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03807\Certification Statement Plant ID_03807.pdf Plant certification statement

03807\Supporting Documentation\03807_AES Westover LLC 3807 Property Line Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03807\Supporting Documentation\3801_Follow Up Questions.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 03807\Supporting Documentation\3807_Follow Up Responses.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 03807\Supporting Documentation\AES Westover LLC 3807 Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 39.116 How does a school determine who receives gifted and talented services? ( a ) To determine who receives gifted and talented funding, the school must use qualified professionals to perform a multi-disciplinary assessment. The assessment may include the examination of work samples or performance appropriate to the area under consideration. The school must have the parent or guardian's written permission to conduct individual assessments or evaluations. Assessments under this section must meet the following standards: ( 1 ) The assessment must use assessment instruments specified in § 39.114 for each of the five criteria for which the student is nominated;
( 2 ) If the assessment uses a multi-criteria evaluation, that evaluation must be an unbiased evaluation based on student needs and abilities;
( 3 ) Indicators for visual and performing arts and leadership may be determined based on national, regional, or local criteria; and
( 4 ) The assessment may use student portfolios.
( b ) A multi-disciplinary team will review the assessment results to determine eligibility for gifted and talented services. The purpose of the team is to determine eligibility and placement to receive gifted and talented services. ( 1 ) Team members may include nominator, classroom teacher, qualified professional who conducted the assessment, local experts as needed, and other appropriate personnel such as the principal and/or a counselor.
( 2 ) A minimum of three team members is required to determine eligibility.
( 3 ) The team will design a specific education plan to provide gifted and talented services related in the areas identified.
### §7015. Under Secretary of the Army

(a) There is an Under Secretary of the Army, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(b) The Under Secretary shall perform such duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §501(a)(5), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1037, §3015; renumbered §7015, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 3013 of this title prior to enactment of Pub. L. 99–433.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3015 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Order of Succession

For order of succession in event of death, permanent disability, or resignation of Secretary of the Army, see Ex. Ord. No. 12908, Apr. 22, 1994, 59 F.R. 21907, listed in a table under section 3345 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.