alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 9, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:

                    1.                     *Michael Fayne Rosinus,*                     Winnetka, Illinois, as part of a group acting in concert with Lightyear Capital, LLC, New York, New York; to acquire .11 percent of the voting shares of Cascade Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Bank of the Cascades, both of Bend, Oregon.                

      ( print page 10364)    
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 17, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-4053 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

80-15 

June 20, 1980 

REFERENCE: 

4021(b)(13) Plans Covered. Professional Service Employer Plans

4021(c)(2)(A) Plans Covered. Definition of Professional Service Employer

4021(c)(2)(B) Plans Covered. Definition of Professional Individuals 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your inquiry whether the above-referenced pension plan (the "Plan") is exempt from the

termination insurance provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") under §

4021(b)(13) as a professional service employer. For the reasons stated herein, this Office concludes that the Plan is not

excluded from Title IV coverage by § 4021(b)(13). 

Section 4021(b)(13) of the Act excludes from coverage any plan: 

established and maintained by a professional service employer which does not at any time after the date of enactment

of this Act have more than 25 active participants in the plan. (emphasis added). 

A professional service employer is any entity owned or controlled by professional individuals, as defined in §

4021(c)(2)(B) of the Act, where both the entity and the professional individuals owning and controlling it are engaged

in the performance of the same professional service. 

Section [*2] 4021(c)(2)(B) lists some but not all of those individuals who are considered to be "professional

individuals. River boat pilots, however, are not included in the list. Consequently, our determination of whether such

individuals, and others not listed, are "professional individuals" depends on an analysis of the services performed and

the expertise required to perform them. 

 As stated in PBGC Opinion Manual letter 76-106, a professional individual generally is one who provides services

which require knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged

course of specialized intellectual instruction and study, as distinguished from a general academic education and from an

apprenticeship or from training in the performance of routine mental, manual or physical processes. The rendering of

professional services generally requires the consistent exercise of discretion and judgment in its performance and usually

would be predominantly intellectual in character. 

The business of the pilots is piloting boats on the River. We understand that the training for the job of pilot consists

primarily of on-the-job training. This work does not require [*3] a prolonged course of intellectual instruction and study

and is not predominantly intellectual in character. Since river boat pilots are not "professional individuals" within Act

§ 4021(c)(2)(B), their pilots' organization cannot be a "professional service employer" within Act § 4021(c)(2)(A).

Therefore, the Plan is not excluded from coverage under Act § 4021(b)(13). 

This letter constitutes an initial determination of the PBGC which is subject to reconsideration under 29 CFR Part

2618. A copy of that regulation is enclosed for your information. 

If you have any questions please contact * * * of this Office at the above address or at (202) 254-3010. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### George S. Levy, Appellant, *v.*Edwin J. Butterfield, Respondent.

(Argued April 3, 1877;

decided April 10, 1877.)

*Max C. Huebner,*for appellant.

*De Witt C. Brown,*for respondent.

*614Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 48.102 With whom may the Director enter into a lease?

The Director or designee may lease to public or private persons or entities who meet the requirements of this part that are applicable to leasing activities.
### [§2673. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–375, div. B, title XXVIII, §2821(d)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2130]

Section, added Pub. L. 100–370, §1(l)(1), July 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 849, related to availability of funds for acquisition of certain interests in land.

A prior section 2673, added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(51), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1459, related to restoration or replacement of facilities damaged or destroyed, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–214, §7(1), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 173, eff. Oct. 1, 1982, and applicable to military construction projects, and to construction and acquisition of military family housing authorized before, on, or after such date. See section 2854 of this title.
# C_2006310EN.01000102.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/1

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg lodged on 5 September 2006 — Heinrich Bauer Verlag BeteiligungsGmbH v Finanzamt für Großunternehmen in Hamburg

(Case C-360/06)

(2006/C 310/02)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Heinrich Bauer Verlag BeteiligungsGmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt für Großunternehmen in Hamburg

Defendant:

Question referred

Is it incompatible with Article 52 in conjunction with Article 58 of the EEC Treaty (now Article 43 in conjunction with Article 48 EC) that, when unlisted shares in a capital company are valued, a financial interest in a German partnership is given a lower value than a financial interest in a partnership established in another Member State?

---
(logo)CWCapital

          ASSET MANAGEMENT

 

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

** **

** **

**GSMS 2012-GCJ7**

 

 

Inaccordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailedin §10.8 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for theabove-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC(“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’sCertificate with respect to the following:

 

(A)    a review of CWCAM’sactivities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the“Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has beenmade under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(B)    to the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.  

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.  

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

 

 

/s/ JamesP. Shevlin

JamesP. Shevlin

President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
### SUBCHAPTER II—TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND CAPACITY BUILDING
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 676 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 330
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 676

                         [Report No. 106-1032]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2000

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of December 15, 2000, 
providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report to 
accompany the bill (H.R. 4577) making appropriations for the 
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for 
other purposes, or any amendment reported in disagreement from a 
conference thereon.
                                                 House Calendar No. 330

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 676

                         [Report No. 106-1032]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 14, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
# C_2006294EN.01006201.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/62

---

Action brought on 4 October 2006 — Italian Republic v Commission

(Case T-280/06)

(2006/C 294/123)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, Avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul memorandum No 06626 of 24 July 2006 of the European Commission — Directorate General Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments of the Commission which differ from the sum requested. Ref. ROP Sicily Programme (No CCI 1999 IT 61 PO 011); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul memorandum No 06626 of 24 July 2006 of the European Commission — Directorate General Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments of the Commission which differ from the sum requested. Ref. ROP Sicily Programme (No CCI 1999 IT 61 PO 011);

| — | annul all related and prior measures, and order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul all related and prior measures, and order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-345/04 Italian Republic v Commission
   (1).

Italian Republic

Commission

1

---

(1)  OJ C 262 of 23.10.04, p. 55.

1

---
#### § 43.8 Destruction of records.

This part does not prevent educational institutions from destroying any records, if not otherwise prevented by law. However, access shall be granted under § 43.5 before destroying student records where the parent or eligible student has requested access. Only records which are no longer relevant or necessary may be destroyed, subject to § 43.23(c).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Correspondence Exam Toll Free Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 26, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Timothy Shepard at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Correspondence Exam Toll Free Project Committee will be held Tuesday, April 26, 2011, at 9 a.m., Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Timothy Shepard. For more information please contact Mr. Shepard at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: February 18, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-4309 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2358

MELVIN RICHARD ROBINSON, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANDREW SAUL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00358-KDB)

Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Richard Robinson, III, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Richard Robinson, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 

motion for appointment of counsel and motion to expedite the district court proceedings 

regarding the denial of his application for disability benefits. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan 

Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Robinson seeks to appeal is neither a final 

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Science and technologypriorities for the FY...budget.**
 
2011 | 2012 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:PREX 2.4/3:R 31/
Item Number:0854-D-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001050257
 
March 20, 2018
### SUBCHAPTER I—FINANCIAL STABILITY
#### § 47.4 When does OIEP provide funding?

By July 1 of each year OIEP will make available for obligation 80 percent of the funds for the fiscal year that begins on the following October 1.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Search For Plans Paying PBGC Premiums 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Search for Plans Paying PBGC Premiums

See FAQs for tips about how to use this search feature.

Note that in very rare instances, an employer pays PBGC premiums in error even though their pension plan is not covered by PBGC. Paying PBGC premiums does not trigger coverage. See PBGC's coverage webpage for information.

                                -  20 
                                -  50 
                                -  100 

Search All (0)Plans Paying PBGC Premiums (0)Trusteed Plans (0)

##           Can't Find What You Are Looking For?      

Visit Our Search Tips page for help refining your search

Download a list of Single-Employer Plans Trusteed by PBGC [Excel]

**ESPAÑOL:**Como Buscar Una Pensión en la Barra de Búsqueda

View additional External Resources for Locating Benefits

##           Single-Employer Resources      

**EFAST2:** Search federal database of employee benefit plan information, including information on funding status.

Plans Paying PBGC Premiums FAQs

##           Multiemployer Resources      

Multiemployer Insurance Program Fact Sheet

Introduction to Multiemployer Plans

Multiemployer Benefit Guarantees

##           Download Lists of Plans Paying PBGC Premiums      

Single-Employer List

Multiemployer List
# C_2006294EN.01006401.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/64

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Plenary Formation) of 26 October 2006 — Landgren v European Training Foundation

(Case F-1/05) (1)

1

(Member of the temporary staff - Contract of indeterminate duration - Dismissal - Professional inadequacy - Duty to state reasons - Manifest error of appraisal)

(2006/C 294/126)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Claimant: Pia Landgren (Turin, Italy) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Claimant:

Defendant: European Training Foundation (represented by: M. Dunbar, Director, and G. Vandersanden, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the decision to dismiss the claimant and application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | sets aside the decision of the European Training Foundation of 25 June 2004 to revoke Ms Landgren's contract of indeterminate duration as a member of the temporary staff; |
| --- | --- |

1.

sets aside the decision of the European Training Foundation of 25 June 2004 to revoke Ms Landgren's contract of indeterminate duration as a member of the temporary staff;

| 2. | enjoins the parties to forward to the Tribunal, within three months of the date of delivery of this judgment, either the jointly agreed amount of monetary compensation resulting from the illegality of the decision of 25 June 2004 or, failing agreement on the matter, the figures which they wish to submit in respect of that amount; |
| --- | --- |

2.

enjoins the parties to forward to the Tribunal, within three months of the date of delivery of this judgment, either the jointly agreed amount of monetary compensation resulting from the illegality of the decision of 25 June 2004 or, failing agreement on the matter, the figures which they wish to submit in respect of that amount;

| 3. | reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182 of 23.7.2005, p. 39 (case originally registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-180/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---