alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 638 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 314
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 638

                          [Report No. 106-990]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4635) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans 
 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent 
agencies, boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2000

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4635) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans 
 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent 
agencies, boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4635) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and 
Housing and Urban Development and for sundry independent agencies, 
boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.

                                                 House Calendar No. 314

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 638

                          [Report No. 106-990]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4635) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans 
 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent 
agencies, boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 18, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
'Do<'os^'m'r-';^<i^:^ 

November 19,2009 S^ S 

Ogdeosburg Bridge and Port Authority __ o§•^ ^ 

1 Bridge Plaza • ^ 

Ogdensburg, NY 13669 ^ 

Members of the Board OBP A, 

After reading tite Watertown Times and the Ogdensburg Jomnai in regard to C^)e Air, I have become 

concerned that you mi^ t consider anodier air service. We have had such wonderful experiences with Cape 

Air that I can't imagine anything any better for Ogdensburg. 

Our daughter who lives in the Boston area has had to make ssv&ral last minute emergency flights home 

because of illness of either my husband or me. She much prefers driving to Albany, than to have the 

hassle of going through Logan. She makes much better connections than when she fiew through Ottawa. 

Cape Air has always been able to acconmodate her to make sure she has a seat Because of the wonderfiil 

connections, she has made several more trips home than she has ever been able to do jn^viously. 

Please consider this one very satisfied customer of Cape Air when making your decision. 

Best wishes for a Happy Thanksgiving. 

Rena S. Gol^erg 

c/c Cape Air 

247 Proctor Avenue • Ogdensburg, NY 13669 •» 315/393-3844 * rgoictbe1@twcny.rr.com
EXHIBIT
10.1


 


Summary of Oral
Agreement for Payment of Services


between Cephalon, Inc.


and


its Board of
Directors


dated May 22,
2008


 


Cephalon, Inc. (“Cephalon”) compensates its
non-employee directors through a mix of base cash compensation and stock option
grants, summarized as follows:


 


	
  Cash Compensation:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Board Service Annual
  Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  50,000

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Per Meeting Fees

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Attendance in person

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,000/mtg.

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Attendance by telephone

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000/mtg.

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Committee Service Fees

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Audit Committee Chair
  Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Stock Option and
  Compensation Committee Chair Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  17,000

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Corporate Governance and
  Nominating Committee Chair Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  17,000

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Committee Member Annual
  Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  15,000

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Presiding Director Annual
  Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Options:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Initial Grant (upon first
  election or appointment to Board)

  	
   

  	
  15,000 shares

  	
   

  
	
  ·  Annual Grant (dated as of
  the date of the Annual Meeting)

  	
   

  	
  10,000 shares

  	
   

  



 


Under the Cephalon
2004 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2004 Plan”), the initial grant of 15,000
stock options to a non-employee director is made at the time of the earlier to
occur of such director’s appointment as a director by the Board or first
election to the Board by stockholders. This initial award generally vests over
a four-year period, with 25% becoming exercisable on each anniversary of the
grant date. Upon the date of re-election to the Board at the Annual Meeting, a
non-employee director will receive an annual grant of 10,000 stock options that
are fully exercisable on the date of grant. The Board of Directors also may
grant options to non-employee directors in addition to the automatic grants
described above. Stock options granted to non-employee directors have a
ten-year term and are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant.


 


Dr. Frank Baldino,
Jr., the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cephalon, receives no
additional remuneration for his service as a director. Cephalon also reimburses
directors for travel expenses incurred in connection with attending Board,
committee and stockholder meetings and for other Cephalon business-related
expenses. Cephalon does not provide retirement benefits or other perquisites to
non-employee directors under any current program.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40422 Conference Calendar

__________________ ROLAND R. HUNT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DR. A. LARSON, B. CHANEY, D. JEFFCOAT, and C. KYLE Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 94-CV-444

- - - - - - - - - - August 23, 1995 Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Deliberate indifference to a prisoner's serious medical need violates the Eighth Amendment. Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). A prison official does not violate the Eighth Amendment "unless [he] knows of and disregards an excessive risk to an inmate's health or safety; the official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also drawNo. 95-40422 -2- the inference." Farmer v. Brennan , 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1979 (1994). Negligence, neglect, and even medical malpractice are not actionable under § 1983. Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). When an inmate's medical record does not reflect any medical need for work restrictions, actions of prison officials in requiring an inmate to work despite his complaints could amount to nothing more than negligence, which is not actionable under § 1983. Reeves v. Collins , 27 F.3d 174, 177 (5th Cir. 1994). Because his work assignment was consistent with his medical classification, Warden Chaney, Officers Jeffcoat and Kyle, and Captain Wyatt were not deliberately indifferent to Hunt's medical needs by relying on his medical records and classification to assign him to a work detail. See Reeves , 27 F.3d at 177. Hunt failed to show that Dr. Larson's actions amounted to deliberate indifference to his medical needs because he complains only that Dr. Larson made a mistake in assigning him a medical classification "1AP." Hunt presents nothing more than negligence or malpractice, thus his claims have no arguable basis in law and were properly dismissed.
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1


|CERTIFICATIONAS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|I, Craig H. Stevenson, Jr., certify that:                                       
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                

|      |              |                                        
|----- | ------------ | ---------------------------------------
|      |              |                                        
|Date: | May 10, 2004 | By:                                    
|      |              |                                        
|      |              | Craig H. Stevenson, Jr. Chairman of the
|      |              | Board and Chief Executive Officer      

---
#### Julia I. Lewis, an Infant, by George A. Lewis, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. New York and Queens County Railway Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order, affirmed, with "costs. No opinion. Woodward, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, P. J., not voting. ■
### §3015. Simplified acquisition threshold

In this part:

(1) The term "simplified acquisition threshold" has the meaning provided that term in section 134 of title 41, except that, in the case of any contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, outside the United States in support of a contingency operation or a humanitarian or peacekeeping operation, the term means an amount equal to two times the amount specified for that term in such section.

(2) The term "humanitarian or peacekeeping operation" means a military operation in support of the provision of humanitarian or foreign disaster assistance or in support of a peacekeeping operation under chapter VI or VII of the Charter of the United Nations. The term does not include routine training, force rotation, or stationing.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1806(b)(1), (6), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4153, 4154.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of pars. (7) and (8) of section 2302 of this title, which were transferred to this section, redesignated as pars. (1) and (2), respectively, and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1806(b)(6), was based on Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1502, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3296; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VIII, §807(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2606; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VIII, §803(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1832; Pub. L. 111–350, §5(b)(8)(C), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3843; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, §1071(a)(2)(A), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3504.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3015 was renumbered section 7015 of this title.

Another prior section 3015, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 158, §3014; renumbered §3015, Oct. 1, 1986, Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §501(a)(2), 100 Stat. 1034, related to Comptroller and Deputy Comptroller of the Army, powers and duties, and appointment, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–433, §501(a)(5).

Another prior section 3015 was renumbered section 3040 of this title and subsequently repealed.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1806(b)(6), redesignated pars. (7) and (8) of section 2302 of this title as pars. (1) and (2), respectively, of this section and inserted introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11078-11079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4359]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Bureau of Prisons

28 CFR Part 541

[Docket No. BOP-1118-F]
RIN 1120-AB18


Inmate Discipline Program/Special Housing Units: Subpart Revision 
and Clarification

AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice.

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the Bureau of Prisons delays the effective 
date of the final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on 
December 8, 2010, (75 FR 76263) and the subsequent correction which 
appeared in the

[[Page 11079]]

Federal Register on December 29, 2010 (75 FR 81853). The new effective 
date for both documents is June 20, 2011.

DATES: Effective March 1, 2011, the effective date of the final rule 
published December 8, 2010 (75 FR 76263) and correction document 
published December 29, 2010 (75 FR 81853) is delayed to June 20, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Qureshi, Office of General 
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 307-2105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In this document, the Bureau of Prisons 
delays the effective date of the final rule that appeared in the 
Federal Register on December 8, 2010, (75 FR 76263) and the subsequent 
correction which appeared in the Federal Register on December 29, 2010 
(75 FR 81853). The new effective date for both documents is June 20, 
2011.
    The first document issued a final rule amending the Bureau's Inmate 
Discipline Program and Special Housing Units (SHU) regulations (28 CFR 
part 541, subpart A and subpart B), and the second document corrected 
typographical and numbering errors, but made no substantive changes to 
the final rule.
    Previously, both the final rule and the correction document had an 
effective date of March 1, 2011. We now delay the effective date of 
both the final rule and the correction document until June 20, 2011.

Helen Marberry,
Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons.
[FR Doc. 2011-4359 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
# CA2006162DE.01000101.xml

| 13.7.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 162/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 162/1

---

HINWEIS FÜR DIE LESER

Image

---
§ 36.12 Standard III—Program needs assessment. The policy and procedures of each school and its curricula shall be developed and revised based on an assessment of educational needs. This needs assessment shall be conducted at least every seven (7) years at the same frequency as required in § 36.50, School Program Evaluation. This assessment shall include at least the following: ( a ) A clear statement of student educational goals and objectives. A student educational goal is defined as a statement of the knowledge, skills, attitudes, or concepts students are expected to exhibit upon completion of a grade level. Student educational objectives are defined as statements of more specific knowledge, skills, attitudes, or concepts students must exhibit in order to achieve the goal.
( b ) The collection of appropriate data from which valid determinations, judgments, and decisions can be made with respect to the status of the educational program, e.g., ( 1 ) Perceptions of the parents, tribes, educators, and the students with regard to the relevance and importance of the goals.
( 2 ) The extent to which educational goals and objectives have been achieved.
( 3 ) The data developed as a result of the evaluation outlined in § 36.50 School Program Evaluation.
( c ) A statement of educational needs which identifies the difference between the current status of students and the desired goals for the students.
( d ) A plan of action to remediate assessed needs.
### **CHAPTER 7—FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The bulk of this chapter was repealed by Pub. L. 92–181, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 625, which completely rewrote the farm credit laws and represented a fundamental reworking of the statutory basis for the farm credit system. The farm credit system is covered in chapter 23 (§2001 et seq.) of this title. See notes set out under section 2001 of this title.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00119-CV

Thomas Borgstedte, M.D., and excellerx, Inc.

a/k/a Hospice Pharmacia, Appellants

v.

Debra Leigh, Kelvin Leonard and Thea King, Individually

and on Behalf of the Estate of Bobby Leonard, Deceased, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY, 155TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2007V-034, HONORABLE DAN R. BECK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants Thomas Borgstedte, M.D., and excellerx, Inc. a/k/a Hospice Pharmacia

and appellees Debra Leigh, Kelvin Leonard and Thea King, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate

of Bobby Leonard, Deceased, have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion states that

appellants no longer wish to prosecute this appeal and that the parties have agreed to voluntarily

dismiss the appeal in this matter. Accordingly, we grant the joint motion to dismiss and dismiss this

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: March 26, 2008
### Quantitative and historical evidence of vegetation changes along the upper Gila River, Arizona

By: R. M. Turner

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp655H

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Quantitative and historical evidence of vegetation changes along the upper Gila River, Arizona(1973)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### [§2432. Renumbered §4351]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

As originally enacted, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1849(b)–(k), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4259–4264, transferred individual subsecs. of this section to section 4350 et seq. of this title, and section 1849(l) of Pub. L. 116–283 subsequently repealed this section. Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(o)(1)–(5), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2146, 2147, amended section 1849 of Pub. L. 116–283, effective as if included therein, so that the individual transfers were eliminated and this section was transferred as a whole to section 4351 of this title. However, the repeal of this section by section 1849(l) (which was redesignated as section 1849(e)) of Pub. L. 116–283 was not eliminated and therefore could not be executed given the transfer of this section to section 4351 of this title.