alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## l>0T'OSr'2crS-\S\2 S 

# W l Delt a Count yAirpor t ^^^tf H FL Y FROIV I NEARB Y Bil l Kwarcian y Chaiitna n Davi dWoodworthV-Chai r Chri s Anderso n Darre l Bengry 330 0 Airport Roa d Escanaba , M I 4982 9 Administration : (906)786-4902 ; Fax ; (906)786-258 3 airport@deUacountymi.or g www.deltacountymi.org/airpor t Brian Heriou x Vicki e Michea

u Dav e Schult z Conni e Ness , Manage r

Denni s DeVan y Brian Swanso n Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Division , X-53 , Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 SeventhStreet , S.W . Washington . D.C . 2059 0 Apri l 27 , 201 0 Dea rMr . DeVan yan d Bria n Swanson , o Th e Delt a Count yAirpor t Boar d ha s reviewe d th e bi d offer s fo rEssentia l Ai rServic e t o th e Delt a Count y Airpor t an d ha s decide d t o suppor t th e bi d optio n # 3 fro m Mesab a d/b/ a Delt a Connection . Consistency an d continuit yhav e bee n majo rconsideration s i n thi s decisio n as loca l passenge rboading s hav e bee n increasin g sinc e Delt a starte d servic e an d frequen t flye rloyalt yha s bee n established . Thei rrecor d o f o n tim e performanc e wit h fe wcancellation s ha s bee n ver ygood . Delt a Airline s i s a worl d clas s airline , creatin g globa l busines s an d economi copportunit yfo rou rcommunity . Delt a has addresse d communit yconcern s b yaddin g a fligh t t o Detroi t an d allowin g loca l staffin g addition s t o bette rserv e loca l customers . Th e frequenc yo f schedulin g t o Detroi t wil l improv e sea t availabilit yan d accessibilit yfo rEscanaba . I t i s expecte d tha t mor e seat s wil l als o ai d i n maintainin g competitiv e fares . Th e Airpor t Boar d i s please d t o se e th e effor t Delt a Airline s i s makin g t o suppor t ou rcommunit yan d airpor t an d support s thei rbi d as th e bes t optio n fo rou rcommunity . Than k yo u fo ryou rconsideratio n i n thi s matter . Sincerely , Davi d Woodwort h Delt a Count yAirpor t Boar d Vice-Chairma n
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-25 

February 14, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(a) Plans Covered. Requirements of Coverage 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request of January 16, 1976, for a reconsideration of our decision regarding the notice

of plan termination submitted on June 20, 1975, by 

You indicate that the "Employee Retirement Plan II of * * * was "continued" by * * * after April, 1974 and that such

continuance, apparently, occurred due to the fact that * * * neither rejected the * * * plan nor adopted a different plan.

You also state that the actions of * * * subsequent to * * * April, 1974, indicate a continuance of the * * * Plan. Our

understanding of the facts differs. 

First, we find no provision of the * * * plan referring to a concept of successorship whereby a participating entity

within the meaning of "Company" * * * automatically "continues" the plan, absent a formal rejection, upon ceasing to

be a subsidiary of * * * In fact, Section 16.2 of the * * * plan indicates that a plan termination occurs. "unless a successor

retirement plan is adopted as a continuation of this plan." Also, the Stock Purchase Agreement of April 12, 1974 between

* * * and * * * states on page 36 that * * * will be "caused" to "adopt" either the * * * plan or [*2] a comparable plan.

Second, the information provided to this Corporation indicates that a separate plan from the * * * plan allegedly was

adopted by * * * (See Trust Agreement of July, 1974). However, neither has evidence of such adoption nor its subject

plan document been presented to this Corporation. Indeed, the notice of termination submitted on June 20, 1975 and

the "Application of * * * for Appointment of a Trustee" (which was filed with the U.S. District Court for the Western

District of Tennessee, Western Division, on * * * indicates that no "official" adoption occurred. Rather, the above

"Application" alleges that after such date * * * "operated" pursuant to and " treated" the * * * plan as the plan of * * *

Moreover, there exists, according to the notice of termination, no employer identification number for the trust; our

investigation has revealed that after April, 1974, the Company made only preliminary efforts to adopt a plan and no

documentation was drafted; we have a copy of a letter dated M ay 8, 1975 from * * *; * * * the trustee, to * * * indicating

a failure to adopt a plan or appoint a retirement committee and the fund's depletion due to "previously authorized" [*3]

pension payments; and we have no information that contributions were made for any period of time after April, 1974.

Due to the fact that the threshold requirement of a written plan document was not satisfied in this case, the effect

of the ceasing of contributions on the plan's coverage has not been considered. 

Accordingly, our previous position is reaffirmed. 

Steven E. Schanes 

Executive Director
# United States Court of App eals For the Seventh Circuit Chic ago, I lli nois 60604 Subm i tte d A pri l3, 20 09 De ci ded A ugust 1 4, 20 09

B efo re K E N N E T H F. R IP P L E , Cir cu i tJudg e D A N IE L A . M A N IO N , Cir cu i tJudg e D IA N E P . W O O D , Cir cu i tJudg e N o. 07- 2134 UNI T E D S T AT E S O F AME R I C A , P la intif f-A pp ellee, v. L AWRE NC E W. B E NS O N ,

D ef endant-Appellant
. On Rem and fr om the Suprem e C ou rt o f the Unite d Sta tes N o. 06
- CR
- 8 L yn n A d elm an , Judg e . O R D E R The dis tr i ct c ourtse ntenced Law re nce Benson und erthe A rm ed Caree r Cri m i nalA ct, 18 U .S.C . § 92 4(e ); on e o f t h e th re e c rim es t h atp re d ica te d t h e en h an c em en t w as a 1 98 4 juv en ile a dj u d i c a t i o n f o ri nj u r y b y n e g l i g e n tu s e o fa d a n g e r o u s w e a p o n . O n r e ma n d fr o m th e S u p r e me C ou rt, the gove rnm en t con ced es th at, und er B ega y v. U nited Sta tes , 12 8 S . Ct . 1 58 1 ( 20 08 ) , a nd U nite d States v. Sm ith , 5 44 F .3d 78 1, 78 6 ( 7th Ci r. 20 08) , a cri m e r equi ring the m entalst ate o f n eg lige n c e is n ota “v iole n t fe lon y” u n d er th e A c t. O u r in d ep en d en t a n aly s i s c o n f i r m s th is ass ess m ent. W e there f or e V AC ATE the s e nt e nc e a nd R EMAN D f o rfur th erpr o ce eding s i n l i g ht of Bega y . 

### NO NPRE CE DE NT IAL D ISP OSIT ION

To be c ited only

in acc ordanc e with Fe d. R. App. P. 32.1
### SUBCHAPTER I—ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
#### MOHAWK RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. Marie LEACHMAN, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Branan Tire Company, Inc., Bankrupt, Appellee.

No. 15310.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 1954.

A. Mims Wilkinson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

T. B. Higdon, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion filed by appellee, Marie Leachman, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Branan Tire Company, Bankrupt, to dismiss the appeal in the above entitled cause for want of prosecution,

It appearing to the Court that the transcript of record was received by the Clerk of this Court on June 23, 1954, and on that date a requisition for the deposit to cover the estimated cost of Court and printing the record was mailed to counsel for appellant, Mr. A. Mims Wilkinson, Jr., of Atlanta, Georgia; on August 24, 1954, a second notice was mailed to said counsel and up to the present date no deposit or response was ever received, and therefore, the case has never been docketed in this Court;

It is now ordered and adjudged by this Court that the case be duly docketed in this Court and the appeal dismissed for want of prosecution and under Rule 16 of this Court, at the cost of appellant.
§ 39.711 How does a school calculate annual bus transportation miles for residential students? To calculate the total annual transportation miles for residential students, a school must use the procedures in paragraph (b) of this section. ( a ) The school can receive funds for the following trips: ( 1 ) Transportation to the school at the start of the school year;
( 2 ) Round trip home at Christmas; and
( 3 ) Return trip to home at the end of the school year.
( b ) To calculate the actual miles driven to transport students from home to school at the start of the school year, add together the miles driven for all buses used to transport students from their homes to the school. If a school transports students over unimproved roads, the school must separate the number of miles driven for each bus into improved miles and unimproved miles. The number of miles driven is the sum of: ( 1 ) The number of miles driven on improved roads; and
( 2 ) The number of miles driven on unimproved roads multiplied by 1.2.
( c ) The annual miles driven for each school is the sum of the mileage from paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section multiplied by 4.
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of River Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Patrick G. Yount, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, that:





| | 1. |  | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/      PATRICK G.
YOUNTPatrick G. Yount Chief Financial
Officer





November 14, 2002
**Exhibit 32.1**

**IDEAEDGE, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IdeaEdge, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Collas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
### [§2368. Renumbered §4124]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2368, added Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VIII, §823(a)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2018; amended Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VIII, §841(c)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1514; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §701(g)(1), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 115, which authorized studies in fields of research and development essential to development of critical technologies, was repealed by Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §821(c)(1), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1431.
#### Morris & Cumings Dredging Company, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. ' No opinion.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7478

TERRY ROSEBORO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES FELTS, Warden of FCI-Beckley; DR. D. MCLAIN, 

Clinical Director; J. ROWE, APRN, Nurse Practitioner; UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA, Serve: Mr. Peter D. Keisler, United 

States Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Tenth 

Street and Constitution Ave. N.W.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, 

District Judge. (5:08-cv-01433)

Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Lee Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Dee Pyne Crane, 

BUREAU OF PRISONS, Beaver, West Virginia; Stephen Michael Horn, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Roseboro appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Roseboro v. Felts, 

No. 5:08-cv-01433 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 22, 2012). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Recursos Adicionales 
-  Glosario de Términos – Inglés-Español 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov’s English home page for more information available in English.

# Glosario de Términos – Inglés-Español

ABCDEFGHIJ K LMNOPQRSTUV X Y Z

Nombres de Formularios de PBGC   |  Nombres de publicaciones de PBGC

**A**

**B**

 

 

 

**C**

**D**

**E**

**F**

**G**

**H**

I

**J**

L

**M**

**N**

**O**

**P**

**Q**

**R**

**S**

**T**

**U**

**V**

**Y**

Nombres de Formularios de PBGC

Nombres de Publicaciones Adjuntas 

Mayo 21, 2021

Déjenos sus comentarios
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosine Communications, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Terry Gibson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Terry GibsonTerry GibsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 15, 2004
No.---.

#### Clark *v.*Community Service Publishing Inc. et al.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
### [§2539. Renumbered §4883]
### [§2439. Renumbered §4236]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2439, added Pub. L. 99–145, title IX, §912(a)(1), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 685, §2305a; amended Pub. L. 99–433, title I, §110(g)(3), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1004; renumbered §2438 and amended Pub. L. 100–26, §7(b)(9)(A), (k)(2), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 280, 284; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §805, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1591; renumbered §2439, Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VIII, §821(a)(1)(A), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2459, related to preparation of acquisition strategy for major programs and use of competitive alternative sources, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–355, title III, §3007(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3331.
#### Gabriel Fortune, by Mary Fortune, as Guardian ad Litem, v. William H. Hall.

— Motion denied.
H. Res. 670

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

December 11, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 129)

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2006281EN.01005002.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/50

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 October 2006 — Grunheid v Commission

(Case F-35/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 281/90)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 17.06.2006.

1

---
# C_2006277EN.01002602.xml

| 15.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/26

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4385 — HSBC/Lamda/Olympia Village)

(2006/C 277/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 October 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4385. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4385. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,326)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,540
<PP&E>                                          25,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,263)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 335,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                     266,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   335,576
<SALES>                                         24,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,571
<CGS>                                           20,629
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    32
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,696)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (93)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
### The 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington

By: Peter W. Lipman**Donal Ray Mullineaux

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1250

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**IDEAEDGE, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IdeaEdge, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Collas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
# C_2006294EN.01003503.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/35

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 September 2006 — (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — Belgium) — Samotor SPRL v Belgian State

(Case C-378/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/63)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 330, 24.12.2005.

1

---