alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 214.29 Prospecting; abandonment of mines.

All prospecting or mining operations or the abandonment of a well or mine shall be subject to the approval of the superintendent, and any disagreement between lessees of mineral leases regarding operations likely to result in injury to either lessee shall be determined by the superintendent, whose decision shall be final, unless an appeal is filed with the Secretary of the Interior within 30 days after notice of such decision.
#### § 36.76 Who is in charge of all homeliving operations?

One staff member who has the authority to ensure the successful functioning of all phases of the homeliving program should be designated as in charge of all homeliving operations. All staff should be advised of the lines of authority through an organizational chart approved by the local board responsible for operations of the homeliving program.
tte-441 , J. 

Hardesty 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

LANALSIKOV LOWE, No. 63096 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND CLARK COUNTY 

PUBLIC DEFENDER, 

Respondents, 

and 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Real Party in Interest. 

ORDER DENYING PETITIONS 

Docket Nos. 63107, 63108, and 63109 are proper person 

petitions for a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, prohibition. 

Docket No. 63096 is a proper person petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 

Petitioner requests that the charges pending against him be dismissed 

with prejudice and that various attorneys and the district court judge be 

charged with crimes and/or suspended from the practice of law. We have 

reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding 

upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise 

original jurisdiction in these matters. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 

34.320; NRS 34.330; NRS 34.360; NRS 34.370; NRS 34.700; NRS 34.710. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petitions DENIED. 
cc: Lanalsikov Lowe 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Clark County Public Defender 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3 

EMILV E111 1
# C_2006326EN.01008102.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/81

---

Action brought on 1 December 2006 — Angiotech Pharmaceuticals v OHIM (VASCULAR WRAP)

(Case T-342/06)

(2006/C 326/165)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Vancouver, Canada) (represented by: T. Clark, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul decision R 751/2006-2 of the Second Board of Appeal, dated 20 September 2006, and remit the application to the Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market to allow it to proceed; or |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul decision R 751/2006-2 of the Second Board of Appeal, dated 20 September 2006, and remit the application to the Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market to allow it to proceed; or

| — | in the alternative, if the Court finds that the application should only be allowed to proceed in relation to some of the goods the subject of the application, it should annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal in relation to those goods only and remit the application to proceed before the Office in accordance with that finding; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, if the Court finds that the application should only be allowed to proceed in relation to some of the goods the subject of the application, it should annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal in relation to those goods only and remit the application to proceed before the Office in accordance with that finding;

| — | order that the Office pay the applicant's costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the Office pay the applicant's costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘VASCULAR WRAP’ for goods and services in classes 5 and 10 (dressings, bandages, coatings, compositions and medical devices for surgical application) — application number 4220811.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2006331EN.01002606.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 November 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-318/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 331/59)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         875,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  406,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (30,809)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,449,288
<PP&E>                                       5,535,379
<DEPRECIATION>                               (137,737)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,518,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,396,950
<BONDS>                                      4,280,642
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          487,073
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,263,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,518,506
<SALES>                                        657,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               657,622
<CGS>                                          455,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  491,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (414,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,712
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (428,788)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (428,788)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Consent of Gaffney, Cline & Associates



 Exhibit 10.1 
  

			
	  
 


  
	 	 Four Oaks Place
 1360 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2500
 Houston, Texas 77056

	 	
	 	


							
				
	Principals	 		 	Telephone:	 	(713) 850-9955
	William B. Cline	 		 	Facsimile:	 	(713) 850-9966
	Peter D. Gaffney	 		 	Email:	 	gcah@gaffney-cline.com

 DKM/vaw/C1490.00/gcah.194.08 
 May 29, 2008 
 Repsol YPF, S.A. 
 Paseo de la Castellana 278-280 
 28046 Madrid 
 Spain 
 Repsol YPF S.A. Annual Report Form 20-F: 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 As independent reserve engineers for
Repsol YPF S.A., Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Inc. (GCA) hereby confirms that it has granted and not withdrawn its consent to the reference to GCA’s review of Repsol YPF’s reserves as of September 30, 2007 in the form and
context disclosed by Respsol YPF in Section 2.2.1.1. “Oil and Gas Reserves” in Repsol YPF’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007; and in the “Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas
Exploration and Production Activities (unaudited information)” in the Consolidated Financial Statements included therein. 
 GCA audited
certain areas in which Repsol YPF has an interest in Argentina, Venezuela and in the Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A. 
 * * * * * 
 Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	GAFFNEY, CLINE & ASSOCIATES, INC.


  

	
	 /s/ David K. Morgan

	David K. Morgan
	Senior Manager


  

											
	UNITED KINGDOM	 	UNITED STATES	 	SINGAPORE	 	AUSTRALIA	 	ARGENTINA	 	MOSCOW
CURC-EPRI Technology Roadmap 

Executive Summary

Full Roadmap Report at: 

http://www.coal.org/roadmap/index.asp 

August 2012

Coal Technology Advancements

The collaboration between DOE and the private sector over the last three decades to advance coal 

technologies has proven results. Today, three out of every four coal plants in the U.S. are equipped 

with technologies that trace their origins to DOE’s program. In part, other technologies have allowed 

coal use to increase by more than 63% in the U.S. over the last 30 years while the emissions of SO2 and 

NOx have decreased on the order of 70%. In addition to developing commercial technologies to 

control criteria pollutants for NOx, SO2, particulate matter and mercury, this public/private partnership 

is also responsible for the commercial deployment of pressurized fluidized bed combustion systems, 

new coal-based IGCC systems, advanced turbines, and development of materials for highly efficient 

advanced coal combustion power plants. The key to ensure continued success is (1) adequate public 

support, (2) enhanced levels of funding targeted to specific technology areas, and (3) a regulatory and 

public policy framework that supports coal use.

The CURC/EPRI Technology Roadmap 

The Roadmap represents a plan for developing technologies that convert coal to electricity and other 

useful forms of energy and manufacturing feedstocks. The Roadmap describes several coal technology 

advancements that, if developed, will achieve specific cost, performance and environmental goals 

thereby benefiting the nation’s environment, economy, and energy security. By combining the 

technology advances identified in the Roadmap with opportunities for beneficial uses of captured CO2, 

such as enhanced oil recovery, the Roadmap concludes that tomorrow’s coal-based power plants 

equipped with CO2 capture technology will generate electricity while capturing CO2 at costs equal to, 

or less than, today’s power generation plants that use fossil fuels. Other additional benefits of 

successfully implementing the Roadmap include (1) aggressive reduction of water use/discharge, (2) 

significant additional reduction of traditional air pollutants and CO2, (3) enhanced energy and 

economic security via production of low cost power using the largest U.S. domestic energy resource 

while using captured CO2 as a commodity to recover crude oil, and (4) deploying coal-based 

technologies for the production of liquid fuels and other marketable products. 

Roadmap costs

Government partnership support and funding commitments are critical to ensure the goals of the 

Roadmap are accomplished. At current funding (FY 2012) levels, the DOE’s coal R&D budget is nearly 

sufficient to reach the goals of the Roadmap. These funds, however, must be redirected and focused 

upon Roadmap identified programs. CURC recognizes that current DOE budgets do not include funding 

for demonstrations and are unlikely to 

receive annual appropriations, so an 

alternative mechanism to support the 

large demonstrations described in the 

Roadmap is proposed and described in 

the CURC accelerated CO2-EOR Initiative.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHI NGTON , D .C . 20460 

## JU L 0 

# 2 2015 O FF IC E OF AI R A ND RADIAT ION



### MEMORADUM From : Rebecca von dem Hagen , EPA/Stratospheric Protection Division



# ;\J~

**~~j~S** To: EPA Air Docket EPA-HQ- OAR- 2014- 0198 Subject: Docket Placeholder for EPA Responses to Comments on the SNAP Status Change Rule Claimed as Confidential Business Information This memorandum serves as a placeholder for EPA ' s confidential responses to comments and meeting materials that have been claimed as confidential business information (CBI) provided by : • 3M Industrial Adhesives and Tapes Division • Unified Brands • True Manufacturing Company • Whirlpool Corporation • NCFI Polyurethanes • Pactiv Building Products Division • DiversiFoam Products • Dow Chemical Company • Owens Corning • GE Appliances and Lighting • Ford Motor Company EPA has considered these comments and information in developing the final rule. Publicly available comments are summarized and responded to in the preamble to the final rule and the Response to Comments document. EPA ' s responses to information claimed as CBI will not be made available to the public , online or from the U.S . EPA Docket Center.

Internet Address ( URL ) • http //www epa gov Recycled/Recy c lable • Pnnted w1th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100 % Postconsumer. Process C hlonne Free Recycled Paper
November 23, 2015 

Dear Mr. Glass: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA-2015-0480). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/7/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12 - 6070

CAZZIE L. WILLIAMS ,

Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. ERIC D. WILSON, Warden ,

Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. John A
. Gibney, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00689

- JAG )

Submitted : April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Cazzie L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2

PER CURIAM:

Cazzie L. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order d ismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition as a successive 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the de nial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the consti tutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositi ve procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional proces s.

DISMISSED
# ,g3/9D BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT 

### OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic Conferences of the International Air Transport Association Docket OST-02-

# /A877-

# 2

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL 

### OF AGREEMENTS BY THE INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION



### This approval 

### and grant 

### of antitrust 

### immunity 

### is 

### subject, where applicable, to 

### conditions

### previously 

### imposed.
This action is effectiveafter 

# 4 clays unless a petition tiled w&r 14 CFR 385.30 or a review is mdcrtakm on the Deparhmm.0 own moth. In view ofthe agrement’snoncontroversial natlln and the availabilityof the &vc procedure, the 2l-day periodin 14 CFR303.42 k waived

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: David M. O’Connor Director, Government & Industry Affairs - United States International Air Transport Association 1776 

### K St. N.W. Suite 

### 400 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 293-9292
§ 42.10 How must the school communicate individual student rights to students, parents or guardians, and staff? Each school must: ( a ) Develop a student handbook that includes local school policies, definitions of suspension, expulsion, zero tolerance, and other appropriate terms, and a copy of the regulations in this part;
( b ) Provide all school staff a current and updated copy of student rights and responsibilities before the first day of each school year;
( c ) Provide all students and their parents or guardians a current and updated copy of student rights and responsibilities every school year upon enrollment; and
( d ) Require students, school staff, and to the extent possible, parents and guardians, to confirm in writing that they have received a copy and understand the student rights and responsibilities.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth J. Kencel, the President (Principal Executive Officer) of Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 14, 2014



/s/ Kenneth J. KencelKenneth J. Kencel
President (Principal
Executive Officer)




|* | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §7084. Chief of Veterinary Corps

The Chief of the Veterinary Corps of the Army shall be appointed from among officers of the Veterinary Corps.

(Added Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title V, §504(b)(1), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2531, §3084; amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title V, §502(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1456; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1056(c)(11), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3440; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(r)(1), (2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2104; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title V, §506(b), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1374; renumbered §7084, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 7084 to 7088 were renumbered sections 8584 to 8588 of this title, respectively.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3084 of this title as this section.

2017—Pub. L. 115–91 struck out at end "An officer appointed to that position who holds a lower grade shall be appointed in the grade of brigadier general."

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section catchline generally, substituting "Chief of Veterinary Corps" for "Chief of Veterinary Corps: grade", and struck out second sentence of text which read as follows: "The Chief of the Veterinary Corps serves in the grade of brigadier general."

2006—Pub. L. 109–163 substituted colon for semicolon in section catchline.

2003—Pub. L. 108–136 inserted "shall be appointed from among officers of the Veterinary Corps. The Chief of the Veterinary Corps" after "Army".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2003 Amendment

Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title V, §502(b), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1456, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to appointments of the Chief of the Veterinary Corps of the Army that are made on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 24, 2003]."