alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                              20
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      118
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   138
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,664
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,541,191
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,639,389)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       138
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,571
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,812)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.000)


</TABLE>
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Settled Appreciation Right



 Exhibit 4.5 
  

			
	 Notice of Stock Settled Appreciation Right and 
 Agreement
	  	 Virage Logic Corporation
 ID:
77-0416232
 47100 Bayside Parkway
 Fremont, CA
94538

		
	[Name]	  	Option Number:
	[Address]	  	Plan:
		  	ID:

 Effective [            ], you have been granted
a(n) Stock Settled Stock Appreciation Rights to buy [            ] shares of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) stock at
$[            ] per share. 
 The total option price of the shares granted is
$[            ]. 
 Shares in each period will become fully vested on the date shown.

  

							
	 Shares
	  	Vest Type	  	Full Vest	  	Expiration
		  		  		  	
		  		  		  	
		  		  		  	

 By your signature and the Company’s signature below, you and the Company agree that these options are granted
under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and this agreement, all of which are attached and made a part of this document. 
  

					
	  	 		 	  
	Virage Logic Corporation	 		 	Date
	 	 		 	  
		 		 	Date
### §141. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, R.S. §5191 (part); acts Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §2 (part), 38 Stat. 251; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704, which set out a list of reserve and central reserve cities and permitted the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to reclassify, add to, or terminate the designation of such cities, was apparently included in the 1926 ed. of the Code on the basis of authorities other than the source credits. Accordingly, and because the continuing accuracy of the table was doubtful, this section was omitted.

Some of the other provisions of R.S. §5191 are classified to sections 142 and 143 of this title and some were not included in the Code.

For classification of other provisions of section 2 of act Dec. 23, 1913, see Codification note set out under section 222 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Central Reserve and Reserve Cities

Pub. L. 86–114, §3(b), July 28, 1959, 73 Stat. 263, provided that: "Effective three years after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 28, 1959]—

"(1) New York and Chicago are reclassified as reserve cities under the Federal Reserve Act;

"(2) the classification 'central reserve city' under the Federal Reserve Act, and the authority of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to classify or reclassify cities as 'central reserve cities' under such Act, are terminated;

"(3) section 5192 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C., sec. 144) is amended by striking out 'central reserve or';

"(4) section 2 of the Act of March 3, 1887 (ch. 378; 24 Stat. 560) is repealed;

"(5) the last paragraph of section 2 of the Federal Reserve act (12 U.S.C., sec. 224) is amended by striking out 'and central reserve cities';

"(6) section 11(e) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C., sec. 248e) is amended by striking out 'and central reserve' each place it appears;

"(7) the third paragraph (lettered (a)) of section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C., sec. 462) is amended by striking out 'or central reserve';

"(8) the fifth paragraph (lettered (c)) of such section 19 is repealed;

"(9) subparagraph (2) of the sixth paragraph of such section 19 (as added by the first section of this Act) is amended by striking out 'and a member bank in a central reserve city may hold and maintain the reserve balances which are in effect under this section for member banks described in paragraph (a) or (b),';

"(10) the seventh paragraph of such section 19 is amended by striking out clauses (1), (2), (3), and (4) and inserting in lieu thereof the following: '(1) by member banks in reserve cities, (2) by member banks not in reserve cities, or (3) by all member banks'; and

"(11) the seventh paragraph of such section is further amended by striking out 'and central reserve cities'."
### §1715m. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–289, div. B, title I, §2120(a)(5), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2835

Section, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title II, §222, as added Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title I, §124, 68 Stat. 603; amended Pub. L. 85–104, title I, §§103, 112, July 12, 1957, 71 Stat. 296, 297; Pub. L. 86–372, title I, §§111, 116(b), Sept. 23, 1959, 73 Stat. 661, 664; Pub. L. 88–560, title I, §115, Sept. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 779; Pub. L. 89–117, title II, §212, title XI, §1108(j), Aug. 10, 1965, 79 Stat. 470, 505; Pub. L. 90–19, §1(a)(3), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 17; Pub. L. 90–448, title III, §301, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 505; Pub. L. 91–152, title I, §§102(c), 105, 113(f), Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 380, 381, 384; Pub. L. 91–621, §7(b), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1865; Pub. L. 93–383, title III, §§302(d), 310(c), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 676, 682; Pub. L. 95–128, title III, §§303(d), 304(c), Oct. 12, 1977, 91 Stat. 1132, 1133; Pub. L. 96–153, title III, §312(c), Dec. 21, 1979, 93 Stat. 1116; Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §336(c), Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1654; Pub. L. 100–242, title IV, §406(b)(14), Feb. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1901; Pub. L. 109–241, title IX, §902(f), July 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 567, related to mortgage insurance for servicemen.
### SUBCHAPTER XI—DEPOSITARIES AND FISCAL AGENTS
### [§2221. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title IX, §906(f)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2096]

Section, added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title IX, §914(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 412; amended Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title X, §1008(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2633; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1006(a), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1869; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1069(b)(2), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2136, related to Fisher House trust funds. See section 2493 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 90 days after Oct. 17, 1998, see section 906(f)(3) of Pub. L. 105–261, set out as an Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note under section 1321 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
### §1567a. Mandatory notification of issuance of military protective order to civilian law enforcement

(a) Initial Notification.—In the event a military protective order is issued against a member of the armed forces, the commander of the unit to which the member is assigned shall, not later than seven days after the date of the issuance of the order, notify the appropriate civilian authorities of—

(1) the issuance of the protective order; and

(2) the individuals involved in the order.

(b) Notification in Event of Transfer.—In the event that a member of the armed forces against whom a military protective order is issued is transferred to another unit—

(1) not later than the date of the transfer, the commander of the unit from which the member is transferred shall notify the commander of the unit to which the member is transferred of—

(A) the issuance of the protective order; and

(B) the individuals involved in the order; and

(2) not later than seven days after receiving the notice under paragraph (1), the commander of the unit to which the member is transferred shall provide notice of the order to the appropriate civilian authorities in accordance with subsection (a).

(c) Notification of Changes or Termination.—The commander of the unit to which the member is assigned also shall notify the appropriate civilian authorities of—

(1) any change made in a protective order covered by subsection (a); and

(2) the termination of the protective order.

(Added Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, §562(a), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4470; amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, §1073(a)(17), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2473; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §543(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1376.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92, §543(a)(1), substituted ", the commander of the unit to which the member is assigned shall, not later than seven days after the date of the issuance of the order, notify" for "and any individual involved in the order does not reside on a military installation at any time during the duration of the military protective order, the commander of the military installation shall notify" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–92, §543(a)(3), added subsec. (b). Former subsec. (b) redesignated (c).

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–92, §543(a)(2), (4), redesignated subsec. (b) as (c) and substituted "commander of the unit to which the member is assigned" for "commander of the military installation".

2009—Pub. L. 111–84 made technical amendment to section catchline.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00434-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.L., a Child

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 04-0152-CV

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellant Sally Leeson.

SIGNED September 9, 2015.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
AFS

- 14

- 468

- E

December 8, 2014

Exemption No. 10682 A Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 1277

Mr. Wayne Ehlke

135 Maintenance Compliance Manager Air Methods Corporation

7211 South Peoria Englewood, CO 80112

Dear Mr. Ehlke :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption No.

10682

. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and

limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

B y letter dated August 2 1

, 2014 you petitioned the Federal Aviation Ad ministration (FAA ) on behalf of Air Methods Corp

. (Air Methods ) for an extension of Exemption No. 10682 . That exemption

, from § § 91.411(b) and 91.413 ( c ) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regul ations (14 CFR)

, allows Air Methods to perform Air Traffic C ontrol (ATC) transponder tests and inspections and altimeter system

, and altimeter reporting equipment tests

, and inspections for its part 1 35 aircraft maintained under a n Approved Aircraft Inspec tion Program (AAIP) based

on its C ontinuous Airworthiness Maintenance P rog ram (CAMP).

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exem ption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this p etition would be detrimental to Air Methods Corp

.AFS

- 14

- 468

- E

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10 682 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 10 6(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegat ed to me, I grant Air Methods Corp. an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 91.411(b) and 91.413(c) to perform ATC transponder tests and inspections and altimeter system , and

altimeter reporting equipment t ests

, and inspections for its part 1 35 aircraft maintained under

an AAIP based on its CAMP

. This exemption extension is subject to the following conditions

and limitations below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. All ATC transponder tests and inspections

, a nd all altimeters reporting equipment tests and inspections

, must be conducted under Air Methods Corp’s part 135 CAMP or part 135 AAIP.

2. All tests and inspections must be recorded in the aircraft’s maintenance log by the person performing each inspectio n and test. This entry must identify the person, the date, and this exemption number.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10682 to December 30, 2016

, unless so oner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-1 

January 28, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4403 

OPINION: 

 This is in reference to your recent letter and your December 23, 1980 telephone conversation with Gerald E. Cole,

Assistant Executive Director for Policy and Planning, and David W eingarten, of my staff. 

Your letter raises several questions concerning sections 4063, 4201 through 4225, and 4403 of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (the

"Act"). I understand, however, that as a result of your telephone conversation with Messrs. Cole and Weingarten, you

now have only one question for which you would like a written response. You asked ab out the impact of an election

under section 4403 with respect to a prior employer withdrawal that, at the time of the withdrawal, was subject to the

new employer withdrawal liability provisions in sections 4201 through 4225 of the Act. 

Section 4403 provides that before September 26, 1981, certain plans may elect not to be treated as multiemployer

plans. Section 4403(c) provides that such an election is effective as of September 26, 1980. Therefore, if a plan makes

a legally effective section 4403 election, the plan would not be treated as a multiemployer plan [*2] as of the date of

the employer withdrawal. Accordingly, the employer withdrawal would not be subject to the new employer withdrawal

liability provisions. However, the employer withdrawal may be subject to section 4063. 

I trust this information is of assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### [§§2523, 2524. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1081(f), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 454]

Section 2523, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §823(a)(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1602, §2517; amended Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §824(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1436; renumbered §2523 and amended Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4233(a), (b), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2687; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, §904(d)(1), title XI, §1182(b)(2), title XIII, §1315(d), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1728, 1772, 1787, related to manufacturing extension programs.

A prior section 2523, added Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §821(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1427, related to defense dual-use critical technology partnerships, prior to repeal and restatement in section 2511 (now 4831) of this title by Pub. L. 102–484, §§4202(a), 4221(a).

Section 2524, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4234(a), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2687; amended Pub. L. 103–35, title II, §201(g)(9), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 100; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XIII, §§1314, 1315(e), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1786, 1788; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title X, §1070(b)(10), title XI, §§1114(b), (c), 1115(d), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2857, 2867–2869; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1503(a)(27), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 512, related to defense dual-use assistance extension program.

A prior section 2524 was renumbered section 2513 of this title and was subsequently repealed.
----

NOTICE TO READERS

----
# C_2006331EN.01004901.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/49

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2006 — Aimi and Others v Commission

(Case F-47/06) (1)

1

(Officials - Promotion - Career - Version of the Staff Regulations applicable on 1 May 2004 - Transition to a new career structure - Measure of general application - Equal treatment - Legal interest in bringing proceedings)

(2006/C 331/109)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Nicola Aimi (Evere, Belgium) and Others (represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the individual decisions rejecting the applicants' requests that the Appointing Authority adopt transitional measures in order to guarantee, in the context of the 2005 and subsequent promotion exercises, equal treatment and their acquired rights

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 154, 1.7.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 29, 2000
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001061588
<NAME> NE RESTAURANT COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-2000
<CASH>                                           2,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,425
<PP&E>                                         149,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,203
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,463
<SALES>                                         67,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,035
<CGS>                                           17,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,177)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (705)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,472)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,472)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.49)


</TABLE>
| 1.                | I have reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.                | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.    |
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |   |   |   |
| Date: May 4, 2016 | /s/ Katherine Butkevich                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|              | Katherine Butkevich                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |
|              | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |

----
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.4 Effect on existing tribal rights. Nothing in these regulations shall be construed as: ( a ) Affecting, modifying, diminishing, or otherwise impairing the sovereign immunity from suit enjoyed by Indian tribes;
( b ) Terminating, waiving, modifying, or reducing the trust responsibility of the United States to the Indian tribe(s) or individual Indians. The Secretary shall act in good faith in upholding this trust responsibility;
( c ) Mandating an Indian tribe to apply for a contract(s) or grant(s) as described in the Act; or
( d ) Impeding awards by other Departments and agencies of the United States to Indian tribes to administer Indian programs under any other applicable law.