alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 277

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 581

[Report No. 106–866]

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3986) to provide for a

study of the engineering feasibility of a water exchange in lieu of electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam,

Washington.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 2000

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3986) to

provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a

water exchange in lieu of electrification of the Chandler

Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, Washington.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3986) to

4 provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a water

5 exchange in lieu of electrification of the Chandler Pump-
2

HRES 581 RH

1 ing Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, Washington. The bill

2 shall be considered as read for amendment. The amend3 ment recommended by the Committee on Resources now

4 printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The pre5 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,

6 as amended, to final passage without intervening motion

7 except one hour of debate equally divided and controlled

8 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

9 Committee on Resources and one motion to recommit with

10 or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 277

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 581

[Report No. 106–866]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R.

3986) to provide for a study of the engineeringfeasibility of a water exchange in lieu of electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant atProsser Diversion Dam, Washington.

SEPTEMBER 19, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# C_2006294EN.01004703.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/47

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 September 2006 — Wirtschaftskammer Kärnten and best connect Ampere Strompool v Commission

(Case T-350/03) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Competition - Decision declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market - Legal persons - Acts of individual concern to them - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/100)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Wirtschaftskammer Kärnten and best connect Ampere Strompool GmbH (Klagenfurt, Austria) (represented by: M. Angerer, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially, A. Bouquet, S. Rating and K. Mojzesowicz, and subsequently, A. Bouquet and K. Mojzesowicz)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicants: Ampere AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. von Hammerstein and C.-S. Schweer, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicants:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG (Vienna, Austria); EVN AG (Maria Enzersdorf, Austria); Wien Energie GmbH (Vienna); Energie AG Oberösterreich (Linz, Austria); Burgenländische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG (Eisenstadt, Austria); and Linz AG für Energie, Telekommunikation, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste (Linz) (represented by: S. Polster and H. Wollmann, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/271/EC of 11 June 2003 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2947 — Verbund/EnergieAllianz) (OJ 2004 L 92, p. 91)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and jointly and severally the costs incurred by the Commission and by the interveners Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG, EVN AG, Wien Energie GmbH, Energie AG Oberösterreich, Burgenländische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG and Linz AG für Energie, Telekommunikation, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and jointly and severally the costs incurred by the Commission and by the interveners Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG, EVN AG, Wien Energie GmbH, Energie AG Oberösterreich, Burgenländische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG and Linz AG für Energie, Telekommunikation, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste.

| 3. | The intervener Ampere AG is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The intervener Ampere AG is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 10.01.2004.

1

---
§ 543.13 What are the minimum internal control standards for complimentary services or items? ( a ) *Supervision.* Supervision must be provided as needed for approval of complimentary services by an agent(s) with authority equal to or greater than those being supervised.
( b ) *Complimentary services or items.* Controls must be established and procedures implemented for complimentary services or items that address the following: ( 1 ) Agents authorized to approve the issuance of complimentary services or items, including levels of authorization;
( 2 ) Limits and conditions on the approval and issuance of complimentary services or items;
( 3 ) Making and documenting changes to conditions or limits on the approval and issuance of complimentary services or items;
( 4 ) Documenting and recording the authorization, issuance, and redemption of complimentary services or items, including cash and non-cash gifts; ( i ) Records must include the following for all complimentary items and services equal to or exceeding an amount established by the gaming operation and approved by the TGRA: ( A ) Name of patron who received the complimentary service or item;
( B ) Name(s) of issuer(s) of the complimentary service or item;
( C ) The actual cash value of the complimentary service or item;
( D ) The type of complimentary service or item (i.e., food, beverage); and
( E ) Date the complimentary service or item was issued.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( c ) Complimentary services and items records must be summarized and reviewed for proper authorization and compliance with established authorization thresholds. ( 1 ) A detailed reporting of complimentary services or items transactions that meet an established threshold approved by the TGRA must be prepared at least monthly.
( 2 ) The detailed report must be forwarded to management for review.
( d ) *Variances.* The operation must establish, as approved by the TGRA, the threshold level at which a variance must be reviewed to determine the cause. Any such review must be documented.
### §931b. Art. 131b. Obstructing justice

Any person subject to this chapter who engages in conduct in the case of a certain person against whom the accused had reason to believe there were or would be criminal or disciplinary proceedings pending, with intent to influence, impede, or otherwise obstruct the due administration of justice shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5445, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2956.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
#### Jacob G. Miller, Respondent, v. Charles Jacob and C. Albert Jacob, Appellants.

—Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No.opinion. Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, P. J., hot voting. •
#### § 700.559 Equal opportunity.

Commission personnel shall scrupulously adhere to the Commission program of equal opportunity regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, handicap, or national origin.
§ 215.5 Royalty rates. ( a ) In leases offered for sale at public auction under the regulations in this part the royalty to be paid by the lessee shall be stipulated at a fixed percent of the gross proceeds of all lead and zinc ores and concentrates extracted from the leased premises, the royalty to be computed and based upon each sale of ore or concentrates separately, the rate of royalty to be determined and fixed by the Secretary of the Interior in the case of each lease prior to the offering of such lease for sale. Subject to the right of the Secretary of the Interior to reject any and all bids, leases offered for sale at public auction shall be awarded in each case to the responsible bidder submitting the highest bonus offer.
( b ) In leases not offered for sale at public auction but otherwise made and entered into under the provisions of the regulations in this part the royalty stipulated and fixed therein shall be such as may be determined by the Secretary of the Interior or as may be agreed upon in each case, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior.
( c ) It shall be further provided, however, that said sale-price basis for the determination of the rates and amount of royalty shall not be less than the highest and best obtainable market price of the lead and zinc ores and concentrates at the usual and customary place of disposing of such ores and concentrates at the time of sale: *Provided, however,* That the right is reserved to the Secretary of the Interior to determine and declare such market price if it is deemed necessary for him to do so for the protection of the interests of the Indian lessor: *And provided further,* That the right is reserved to the Secretary of the Interior on behalf of the Indian lessors to reserve at any time it shall be deemed to be to the best interests of the Indian lessors and upon due notice to the lessee, the royalty share of the gross production of the ore and concentrates and upon such notice that the royalty share of such production shall be stored and not sold, the lessee shall be required to store, free of charge to the Indian lessors in the ore bins of said lessee, said royalty shares of the gross production of ore and concentrates, provided that the lessee may not be required to store ore or concentrates for the lessor in amounts greater than one-third of his bin capacity or for a period longer than 6 months.
#### Lennington et al. *v.*Lennington et al.

[No. 12,238.

Filed June 30, 1925.]

From Allen Superior Court; *Carl Yaple,*Special Judge.

Action between Homer Lennington and another and Ort A. Lennington and others. From the judgment rendered, the former appeal. *Reversed.*By the court in banc.

*Lee J. Hartzell*and *Levi A. Todd,*for appellant.

Remy, C. J.

Reversed on authority of *Miller*v. *Julian*(1904), 163 Ind. 582, 72 N. E. 588. But see, *Walpole’s Admr.*v. *Bishop*(1869), 31 Ind. 156; *Finnegan*v. *Finnegan*(1890), 125 Ind. 262, 25 N. E. 341; *Jewell*v. *Gaylor*(1901), 157 Ind. 188, 60 N. E. 1083.
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—RESERVE CITIES; LAWFUL RESERVES
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ELIZABETH SCHWARTZ

, Appellant,

v.

GARY SCHWARTZ

, Appellee

.

No s . 4D 20

- 0057 and 4D20

- 0369

[ February 25, 2021 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Samantha Schosberg Feuer , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 502019MH002386XXXXSB and 502019GA000443XXXXSB

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Couns el, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Gary Schwartz, Pembroke Pines, pro se appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C.J., G ROSS and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IV

House Calendar No. 308

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 627

[Report No. 106–974]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) making

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

111) making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J.

4 Res. 111) making further continuing appropriations for

5 the fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes. The joint

6 resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The

7 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the
2

HRES 627 RH

1 joint resolution to final passage without intervening mo2 tion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and

3 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

4 of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion

5 to recommit.

House Calendar No. 308

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 627

[Report No. 106–974]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 111) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and forother purposes.

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsConcurrent Multidisciplinary Preliminary Assessment of Space Systems (COMPASS) Final Report: Advanced Long-Life Lander Investigating the Venus Environment (ALIVE)The COncurrent Multidisciplinary Preliminary Assessment of Space Systems (COMPASS) Team partnered with the Applied Research Laboratory to perform a NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Program study to evaluate chemical based power systems for keeping a Venus lander alive (power and cooling) and functional for a period of days. The mission class targeted was either a Discovery ($500M) or New Frontiers ($750M to $780M) class mission.Document ID20180001292Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsOleson, Steven R.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 20, 2018Publication DateJanuary 1, 2018Subject CategoryLunar And Planetary Science And ExplorationReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN35334E-19314NASA/TM-2018-219417Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 432938.08.01.03.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsspacecraftVenusAvailable DownloadsNameType20180001292.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 227.21 Restrictions on operations. ( a ) All leases issued under the provisions of the regulations in this part shall be subject to imposition by the Secretary of the Interior of such restrictions as to time or times for the drilling of wells and as to the production from any well or wells as in his judgment may be necessary or proper for the protection of the natural resources of the leased land and in the interest of the lessor. In the exercise of his judgment the Secretary of the Interior may take into consideration, among other things, the Federal laws, State laws, regulations by competent Federal or State authorities, lawful agreements among operators regulating either drilling or production, or both, and any regulatory action desired by tribal authorities.
( b ) All leases issued pursuant to the regulations in this part shall be subject to a co-operative or unit development plan affecting the leased lands if and when required by the Secretary of the Interior, but no lease shall participate in any cooperative or unit plan without prior approval of the Secretary of the Interior.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements as at and for the six months ended June
30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         250,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,686
<OTHER-SE>                                     292,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,969
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,380)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7234

RANDY L. VALENTINE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus THIERRY D. NETTLES, Major at Lieber Correctional Institution, sued in his individual capacity; JOHN CUSACK, Doctor at Lieber Correctional Institution, sued in his individual capacity; JOHN DOES, Officers, sued in their individual capacities; JANE GARMANY, Nurse at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, sued in her individual capacity; ROBIN HANCOCK, Health Counsel, sued in her individual capacity; RICHARD FRIERSON, Doctor at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, sued in his individual capacity; BRIAN R. BLANTON, Doctor at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, sued in his individual capacity; JIM E. PAGE, Director-Hospital Administrator at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, sued in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (4:06-cv-02314-HMH) Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy L. Valentine, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Randy L. Valentine appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Valentine v. Nettles , No. 4:06-cv-02314-HMH (D.S.C. July 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 18.2 What definitions do I need to know? *Act* means the Indian Land Consolidation Act and its amendments, including the American Indian Probate Reform Act of 2004 (AIPRA), Public Law 108-374, as codified at 25 U.S.C. 2201 *et seq.*
*Day* means a calendar day.
*Decedent* means a person who is deceased.
*Department* means the Department of the Interior.
*Devise* means a gift of property by will. Also, to give property by will.
*Devisee* means a person or entity that receives property under a will.
*Indian* means, for the purposes of the Act: ( 1 ) Any person who is a member of a federally recognized Indian tribe, is eligible to become a member of any federally recognized Indian tribe, or is an owner (as of October 27, 2004) of a trust or restricted interest in land;
( 2 ) Any person meeting the definition of Indian under 25 U.S.C. 479; or
( 3 ) With respect to the inheritance and ownership of trust or restricted land in the State of California under 25 U.S.C. 2206, any person described in paragraph (1) or (2) of this definition or any person who owns a trust or restricted interest in a parcel of such land in that State.
*Intestate* means that the decedent died without a will.
*OHA* means the Office of Hearings and Appeals within the Department of the Interior.
*Restricted lands* means real property, the title to which is held by an Indian but which cannot be alienated or encumbered without the Secretary's consent. For the purpose of probate proceedings, restricted lands are treated as if they were trust lands. Except as the law may provide otherwise, the term “restricted lands” as used in this part does not include the restricted lands of the Five Civilized Tribes of Oklahoma or the Osage Nation.
*Testator* means a person who has executed a will.
*Trust lands* means real property, or an interest therein, the title to which is held in trust by the United States for the benefit of an individual Indian or tribe.
*Trust personalty* means all tangible personal property, funds, and securities of any kind that are held in trust in an IIM account or otherwise supervised by the Secretary.
We or us means the Secretary or an authorized representative of the Secretary.