alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 312 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 30, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2910) to amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize 
appropriations for the National Transportation Safety Board for fiscal years 
2000, 2001, and 2002, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now printed in 
the bill, modified by the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 
Rules accompanying this resolution. Each section of that amendment in the nature 
of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill 
for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for the 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time 
during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a 
recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time 
for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic 
vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic 
voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in 
the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute made in order as original text. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### SUBCHAPTER II—BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as chief financial officer of Iron Age Corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

|
|
|
|
|
|



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/Bart R. Huchel                                                             
|                                                                              
|Bart R. Huchel
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President - Finance and
Treasurer

Dated: September 10, 2002
59–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–31 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 569—WATER 

QUALITY INVESTMENT ACT OF 2007 

MARCH 6, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. MATSUI, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 214] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 214, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 569, the Water 

Quality Investment Act of 2007, under an open rule with a 

preprinting requirement. The rule provides one hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill except those arising under clauses 9 and 10 of rule XXI. The 

rule makes in order the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure amendment in the nature of a substitute now printed in 

the bill as an original bill for the purpose of amendment. The 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as 

read. The rule provides that notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 

XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature 

of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the portion 

of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 

8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma amendments for the purpose 

of debate. Each amendment so printed may be offered only by the 

Member who caused it to be printed or his designee and shall be 

considered as read. The rule provides one motion to recommit with 

or without instructions. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with REPORTS
2 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the bill (except for clauses 9 and 10 of Rule XXI), the Committee 

is not aware of any points of order against consideration of the bill. 

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

is prophylactic in nature. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 56 

Date: March 6, 2007. 

Measure: H.R. 569. 

Motion by: Mr. Dreier. 

Summary of motion: to report an open rule with no preprinting 

requirement. 

Results: Defeated 3–8. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Hastings (FL)—Nay; Matsui—Nay; Cardoza—Nay; Welch—Nay; Castor—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; 

Sutton—Nay; Dreier—Yea; Hastings (WA)—Yea; Sessions—Yea. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with REPORTS
# C_2006310EN.01002001.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/20

---

Action brought on 11 October 2006 — TORRES v OHIM — Bodegas Peñalba Lόpez (Torre Albéniz)

(Case T-287/06)

(2006/C 310/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Miguel Torres S.A. (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, M. A. Baz de San Ceferino and A. Castán Pérez-Gόmez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bodegas Peñalba Lόpez S.L.

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 July 2006 in Case R 597/2004-2 and order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 July 2006 in Case R 597/2004-2 and order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Bodegas Peñalba Lόpez S.L.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark Torre Albéniz, in respect of goods in Classes 32, 33 and 39 — Application No 1 191 683.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: A number of Community figurative and word marks and national figurative marks for goods in Class 33.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld and application for registration of the mark dismissed in part.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Application upheld and contested decision refusing registration of the mark applied for annulled in respect of goods in Class 33.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) since the word TORRE is the dominant component in the overall impression produced by the mark applied for, there are aural and visual similarities between the conflicting marks, and a likelihood of confusion exists between the marks which makes it impossible for them to coexist on the market.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

1

---
# CA2007022EN.01000301.xml

| 31.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 22/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 22/3

---

RESERVE LISTS
   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

1

OPEN COMPETITIONS

OPEN COMPETITIONS

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS

(SENIOR CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS — A*9)

(SENIOR CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS — A*9)

(2007/C 22 A/01)

| | EPSO/AD/8/05 — for the CZECH language (CS)


  Option 3

  BREHM Beate |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/8/05 — for the CZECH language (CS)

EPSO/AD/8/05 — for the CZECH language (CS)

Option 3

Option 3

BREHM Beate

| | EPSO/AD/9/05 — for the ESTONIAN language (ET)


  Option 2

  AROELLA Mari-Liis
  LEPA Karl |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/9/05 — for the ESTONIAN language (ET)

EPSO/AD/9/05 — for the ESTONIAN language (ET)

Option 2

Option 2

AROELLA Mari-Liis

LEPA Karl

| | EPSO/AD/10/05 — for the HUNGARIAN language (HU)


  Option 2

  SZABO Peter |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/10/05 — for the HUNGARIAN language (HU)

EPSO/AD/10/05 — for the HUNGARIAN language (HU)

Option 2

Option 2

SZABO Peter

| | EPSO/AD/11/05 — for the LITHUANIAN language (LT)

  NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/11/05 — for the LITHUANIAN language (LT)

EPSO/AD/11/05 — for the LITHUANIAN language (LT)

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

| | EPSO/AD/12/05 — for the LATVIAN language (LV)


  Option 2

  SILE-ZAGORSKA Dina
  ZAUBERGA-LAURA Ieva |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/12/05 — for the LATVIAN language (LV)

EPSO/AD/12/05 — for the LATVIAN language (LV)

Option 2

Option 2

SILE-ZAGORSKA Dina

ZAUBERGA-LAURA Ieva

| | EPSO/AD/13/05 — for the MALTESE language (MT)

  Option 3
  LAMBRECHTS Petra |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/13/05 — for the MALTESE language (MT)

EPSO/AD/13/05 — for the MALTESE language (MT)

Option 3

LAMBRECHTS Petra

| | EPSO/AD/14/05 — for the POLISH language (PL)


  Option 3

  GRZYBOWSKA Anna
  KERSTEN Johanna
  SHORT Michael |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/14/05 — for the POLISH language (PL)

EPSO/AD/14/05 — for the POLISH language (PL)

Option 3

Option 3

GRZYBOWSKA Anna

KERSTEN Johanna

SHORT Michael

| | EPSO/AD/15/05 — for the SLOVENE language (SL)

  NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/15/05 — for the SLOVENE language (SL)

EPSO/AD/15/05 — for the SLOVENE language (SL)

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

| | EPSO/AD/16/05 — for the SLOVAK language (SK)


  Option 3

  MELO VASCONCELOS Joao |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/16/05 — for the SLOVAK language (SK)

EPSO/AD/16/05 — for the SLOVAK language (SK)

Option 3

Option 3

MELO VASCONCELOS Joao

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2007 and may be extended.

31 December 2007

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request that her/his name not be published.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on March 2, 2011 at 
10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matters of the Open Meeting will be:

    Item 1: The Commission will consider whether to propose regulations 
with respect to incentive-based compensation practices at certain 
financial institutions in accordance with Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank 
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
    Item 2: The Commission will consider whether to propose rules for 
the operation and governance of clearing agencies in accordance with 
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 
and Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
    Item 3: The Commission will consider whether to reopen the comment 
period for Regulation MC, which was proposed pursuant to Section 765 of 
the Dodd-Frank Act to mitigate conflicts of interest at security-based 
swap clearing agencies, security-based swap execution facilities, and 
national security exchanges that post or make available for trading 
security-based swaps, in order to solicit further comment on Regulation 
MC and other more recent proposed rulemakings that concern conflicts of 
interest at security-based swap clearing agencies and security-based 
swap execution facilities.
    Item 4: The Commission will consider whether to propose a new rule 
and rule and form amendments under the Securities Act of 1933 and the 
Investment Company Act of 1940, relating to references to credit 
ratings. These amendments are in accordance with Section 939A of the 
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, determined that no earlier 
notice thereof was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

     February 24, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4498 Filed 2-25-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Marines Tackle Marine Combat Instructor of Water Survival TrainingDecember 24, 2014 — Marines dived in to the face the challenges of Marine Combat Instructor of Water Survival course, which concluded Dec. 19, 2014 at Marine Corps Base Hawaii’s pool.Those who passed the 15-day course... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Brookfield PropertyPartners L.P.’s Registration Statement No. 333-196478 on Form F-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-196622 on Form S-8 ofour report dated March 2, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of General GrowthProperties, Inc. and subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Brookfield Property Partners L.P.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 16, 2015
H. Res. 29

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 2, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Ms. Berkley of

Nevada.

Attest:

Clerk.
### [§2541d. Renumbered §4985]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 2542 to 2550 were renumbered sections 2552 to 2560 of this title, respectively.
Certificate of Trust



 Exhibit 4.4 
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 AMERICANWEST CAPITAL TRUST IV 
 THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF AMERICANWEST
CAPITAL TRUST IV (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned on behalf of the Trust to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. §§3801, et seq.)
(the “Act”). 
  

	 	1.	Name. The name of the statutory trust being formed is AmericanWest Capital Trust IV. 

  

	 	2.	Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows: 

 Wilmington Trust Company 
 Rodney Square North 
 1100 North Market Street 

					
		  		 	Wilmington, DE 19890
		  	ATTN:	 	Corporate Capital Markets

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with
Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act. 
  

			
	 WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
 not in its
individual capacity but solely as trustee of
 the Trust

		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:
### The precipitation regime of Long Island, New York

By: J.F. MillerR.H. Frederick

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp627A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### [§678. Renumbered §12310]
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-24 

December 12, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(5) Plans Covered. Employee Contributed Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter of October 23, 1974, in which you ask whether premium payments must be made

for the pension plan of * * * Union No. 13 pursuant to Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

1974. 

The information contained in your letter and information obtained by a staff member of the Corporation in a

telephone conversation with * * * indicates that the plan to which you refer is funded entirely by participants'

contributions. Thus, no contributions to the plan are made by Union No. 13 or any other person as an employer of plan

participants. 

Based on this information, it does not appear that your plan is subject to Title IV of the Act and, therefore, premium

payments are not required to be made. 

Steven E. Schanes 

Acting Executive Director
SCOT-21-0000072

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

ROBERT K.R. QUARTERO, Petitioner,

vs.

KEHAULANI A. QUARTERO, on behalf of minor child,

Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(Case No. 1DA201002043)

ORDER DISMISSING ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

On February 16, 2021, the appellate clerks’ office

received a document from Robert K.R. Quartero (“Quartero”)

entitled, “Respondent’s Notice of Appeal to the Supreme Court of

the State of Hawaii Against the January 15, 2021 Order Denying

Respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration Filed October 22, 2020”

(“Notice of Appeal”). The document was subsequently filed in

this original proceeding on February 17, 2021. In addition, on

February 17, 2021, Quartero filed a document seeking to proceed

on appeal without paying the required filing fees. Upon

consideration of the documents and the record herein, it appears

that Quartero seeks to assert an appeal from the family court’s

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCOT-21-0000072

23-FEB-2021

08:50 AM

Dkt. 6 ORD
January 15, 2021 “Order Denying Respondent’s Motion for

Reconsideration Filed October 22, 2020” in Case No. 1DA201002043.

A notice of appeal filed in the Intermediate Court of Appeals is

the appropriate means to seek such appellate review. See HRS §

571-54 (an interested party aggrieved by a family court order,

including an order on a motion for reconsideration, may appeal to

the intermediate appellate court upon the same terms and

conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review

shall be governed by chapter 602); HRS § 602-57(a) (the ICA has

jurisdiction “[t]o hear and determine appeals from any court or

agency when appeals are allowed by law”). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this original proceeding is

dismissed. The clerk of the appellate court shall file the

documents in this original proceeding in the Intermediate Court

of Appeals. The date of receipt of the document shall be deemed

the filing date.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 23, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
#### § 247.21 Can I appeal an administrative action?

You may appeal any decision made by the Area Director under this part to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs. You may appeal any decision of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs to the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with part 2 of this chapter.