alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 529

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 22, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4690) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and

related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2001, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure

to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: page 102, lines 15 through 17. During consideration of

the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of
2

•HRES 529 EH

the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-49 

April 13, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4004(f)(4) Temporary Authority. Waiver of Employer Liability 

OPINION: 

 The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") has considered the petition submitted by * * * Company

(the "Company") on May 30, 1975 for a waiver of the liability imposed on it by Section 4062 of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). Pursuant to Section 4004(f)(3) of the Act, the PBGC may grant

such a waiver to an employer maintaining a plan terminating during the 270-day period following September 2, 1974

upon a showing that the waiver is necessary to avoid unreasonable hardship, and that the employer was not able, as a

practical matter, to continue the plan. 

The Company has submitted a memorandum in support of its petition for waiver of the application of section 4062

liability which demonstrates that * * * Company * * * Pension Plan (the "Plan") was a plan terminating within 270 days

after the enactment date of the Act and that the Company was not able, as a practical matter, to continue the Plan.

However, with respect to unreasonable hardship, no contention has been made that the imposition of liability will result

in extreme financial difficulty to the Company. The arguments advanced [*2] by the Company are not pertinent to the

applicable standard of unreasonable financial hardship. Therefore, we have concluded that the Company has failed to

prove that the waiver is necessary to avoid unreasonable hardship. 

 Accordingly, we are unable to grant * * * petition for a waiver of the liability imposed on it by Section 4062 of the

Act. 

Kenneth L. Houck 

Executive Director
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 678 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 15, 2000.
    Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and Manual of the House of 
Representatives for the One Hundred Seventh Congress be printed as a House 
document, and that three thousand additional copies shall be printed and bound 
for the use of the House of Representatives, of which nine hundred copies shall 
be bound in leather with thumb index and delivered as may be directed by the 
Parliamentarian of the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# s ^ FLYIN G SERVIC E

May 26 , 201 0

<:~ > Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D.C . 2059 1 ^.^ ATTN : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 ? 5 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 - In th e Matte r

o f Centra l Flyin g Service , Inc . Docke t No . CPlOSWOOOl FA A EIRNo . 2009SW11001 1 DM S No . FAA-2010-001 6 Dear Si r o r Madam : Becaus e Centra l Flyin g Service , Inc . an dth e FA A hav e reache dasettlemen t i n th e above reference dmatter . Centra l Flyin g Service , Inc . i s hereb y ^withdrawing it s reques t for aHearing . Sincerely , CENTRA LFLYIN GSERVICE , INC . 

# '4U_4-MuJ r Richar dN . Holber t Presiden t

150 1 Bon d Stree t • Littl e Rock , Arkansa s 7220 2 • 501-375-324 5 • Fa x501-375-727 4^ • '

CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E

I hereb y certif

y tha t an origina l an dacop y o f th e foregoin g lette r

withdrawin g Central' s reques t for aHearin g hav e bee n maile dthi s date , to : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D.C . 2059 1 ATTN : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 An dacop y o f

th e lette r ha s bee n maile db y to : Stellamari s Williams , Esq . Safety Enforcemen t

Branc h Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Southwes t

Regio n 260 1 MeachamBlv d Fort Worth , Texa s 76193-000 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Bld g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 

# X L ^^sLur^^jr

^ Richar dN . Holber t Presiden t Centra l Flyin g Service , Inc . 150 1 Bon dAvenu e Littl e Rock , Arkansa s 7220 2
### §313. Bilateral or regional cooperation programs: awards and mementos to recognize superior noncombat achievements or performance

(a) General Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may present awards and mementos purchased with funds appropriated for operation and maintenance of the armed forces to recognize superior noncombat achievements or performance by members of friendly foreign forces and other foreign nationals that significantly enhance or support the National Security Strategy of the United States.

(b) Activities That May Be Recognized.—Activities that may be recognized under subsection (a) include superior achievement or performance that—

(1) plays a crucial role in shaping the international security environment in ways that protect and promote United States interests;

(2) supports or enhances United States overseas presence and peacetime engagement activities, including defense cooperation initiatives, security assistance training and programs, and training and exercises with the armed forces;

(3) helps to deter aggression and coercion, build coalitions, and promote regional stability; or

(4) serves as a role model for appropriate conduct by military forces in emerging democracies.

(c) Limitation.—Expenditures for the purchase or production of mementos for award under this section may not exceed the minimal value in effect under section 7342(a)(5) of title 5.

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title XII, §1222(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1652, §1051b; renumbered §313, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1241(b), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2500.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 renumbered section 1051b of this title as this section.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10910-10911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: April 27, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

[[Page 10911]]

    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference 
Call.)
    Contact Person: Manana Sukhareva, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, Suite 959, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-451-3397. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a090f11121b081f173a171b131654141312541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9caccd2d1d8cbdcd4f9d4d8d0d597d7d0d197ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 22, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4360 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §949p–1. Protection of classified information: applicability of subchapter

(a) Protection of Classified Information.—Classified information shall be protected and is privileged from disclosure if disclosure would be detrimental to the national security. Under no circumstances may a military judge order the release of classified information to any person not authorized to receive such information.

(b) Access to Evidence.—Any information admitted into evidence pursuant to any rule, procedure, or order by the military judge shall be provided to the accused.

(c) Declassification.—Trial counsel shall work with the original classification authorities for evidence that may be used at trial to ensure that such evidence is declassified to the maximum extent possible, consistent with the requirements of national security. A decision not to declassify evidence under this section shall not be subject to review by a military commission or upon appeal.

(d) Construction of Provisions.—The judicial construction of the Classified Information Procedures Act (18 U.S.C. App.) shall be authoritative in the interpretation of this subchapter, except to the extent that such construction is inconsistent with the specific requirements of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2590.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Classified Information Procedures Act, referred to in subsec. (d), is Pub. L. 96–456, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2025, which is set out in the Appendix to Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
#### § 48.3 What definitions apply to terms in this part?

*Assistant Secretary* means the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs or his or her designee.

*Bureau* means the Bureau of Indian Education.

*Bureau-operated school* means a day or boarding school, a dormitory for students attending a school other than a Bureau school, or an institution of higher learning and associated facilities operated by the Bureau. This term does not include public schools, Public Law 100-297 Tribally controlled schools, or Public Law 93-638 contract or grant schools.

*Construction* means construction of new facilities, modification, or alteration of existing grounds or building structures.

*Days* means calendar days unless otherwise specified.

*Director* means the Director, Bureau of Indian Education.

*Director's designee* or *designee* means the Associate Deputy Director—Navajo Schools or Associate Deputy Director—Bureau-Operated Schools.

*Department* means the Department of the Interior.

*Donation* means something of value (*e.g.,* funds, land, personal property) received from a non-Federal source without consideration or an exchange of value.

*Employee* means an employee of the Bureau working at a Bureau-operated school.

*Facilities* means land or facilities authorized for use by a Bureau-operated school.

*Funds* means money.

*Fundraising* means requesting donations, selling items, or providing a service, activity, or event to raise funds, except that writing a grant proposal to secure resources to support school purposes is not fundraising. Fundraising does not include requests for donated supplies, materials, in-kind services, or funds (*e.g.,* fees for school activities) that schools traditionally require or request parents and guardians of students to provide.

*Head of the School* means the Principal, President, School Supervisor, Residential Life Director, Superintendent of the School, or equivalent head of a Bureau-operated school.

*Lease* means a written contract or rental agreement executed in accordance with this part, granting the possession and use of facilities at a Bureau-operated school to a private or public person or entity in return for funds.

*Private person or entity* means an individual who is not acting on behalf of a public person or entity and includes, but is not limited to, private companies, nonprofit organizations and any other entity not included in the definition of public person or entity.

*Public person or entity* means a State, local, Federal, or Tribal governmental agency or unit thereof.

*School purposes* means lawful activities and purchases for the benefit of students and school operations including, but not limited to: Academic, residential, and extra-curricular programs during or outside of the normal school day and year; books, supplies or equipment for school use; building construction, maintenance and/or operations; landscape construction, modifications, or maintenance on the school grounds.
### §9231. Command: chaplains

An officer designated as a chaplain has rank without command.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 531, §8581; renumbered §9231, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8581 | 10:235. | R.S. 1122. |

The words "and shall be on the same footing with other officers of the Army, as to tenure of office, retirement, and pensions" are omitted as obsolete, since there is no distinction between the status of a chaplain as an officer and the status of other officers of the Air Force.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8581 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2006178EN.01004201.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/42

---

Action brought on 12 May 2006 — Hinderyckx v Council

(Case F-57/06)

(2006/C 178/78)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jacques Hinderyckx (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.A. Martin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision not to promote the applicant to grade B*8 in the 2005 promotions procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision not to promote the applicant to grade B*8 in the 2005 promotions procedure;

| — | Promote the applicant to grade B*8; |
| --- | --- |

—

Promote the applicant to grade B*8;

| — | Order the defendant to pay to the applicant EUR 2 400 in compensation for all damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay to the applicant EUR 2 400 in compensation for all damage suffered;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, who entered into the service of the European Parliament on 1 April 1994, was transferred to the General Secretariat of the Council on 16 July 2004, as a grade B*7 official. In his application, he disputes the Appointing Authority's decision not to promote him to grade B*8 in the 2005 promotions procedure.

The applicant raises two pleas, the first of which is based on the combination of his length of service in the grade and the excellence of his services to the European Parliament.

In relation to his second plea, the applicant claims that the Appointing Authority should have explained how the procedure used by the Consultative Commission on Promotions (CCP) took into account the differences between the structures of the standard Staff Reports of the European Parliament and the Council. The applicant further maintains that in order to ensure equal opportunity between candidates coming from different institutions, the Council should have provided itself with precise rules, in compliance with the Staff Regulations and capable of guaranteeing equal treatment in the comparative assessment of the merits. The absence of such rules has led the Council to adopt decisions of a discretionary nature.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 88 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 2, 1999.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. Isakson.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Isakson.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Anthony Servidio, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of ITXC Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of this period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 10, 2004



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/    Anthony Servidio
|Name:                   |  | Anthony Servidio       
|Title:                  |  | Chief Financial Officer