Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices 10365 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE—Continued 

Agency 

SF– 

424D number of 

annual respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total annual 

responses 

Average burden 

on respondent 

per response in 

hours 

Total burden 

hours 

NEH .................................................................. 0 1 0 30/60 0 

NIST ................................................................. 193 1 193 30/60 97 

NRC ................................................................. 0 1 0 30/60 0 

NSF .................................................................. 0 1 0 30/60 0 

SBA .................................................................. 26 1 26 30/60 13 

SSA .................................................................. 0 1 0 30/60 0 

STATE .............................................................. 0 1 0 30/60 0 

TREASURY ...................................................... 0 1 0 30/60 0 

USAID .............................................................. 289 1 289 30/60 145 

USDA ............................................................... 727 1 727 30/60 364 

USDOJ ............................................................. 0 1 0 30/60 0 

VA .................................................................... 391 1 391 30/60 196 

Total .......................................................... ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ 2,574 

Seleda Perryman, 

Office of the Secretary, HHS PRA Reports 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4112 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4151–AE–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

[Document Identifier: OS–0990–New; 60-day 

Notice] 

Agency Information Collection 

Request. 60-Day Public Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS. 

In compliance with the requirement 

of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Office of the Secretary (OS), Department 

of Health and Human Services, is 

publishing the following summary of a 

proposed information collection request 

for public comment. Interested persons 

are invited to send comments regarding 

this burden estimate or any other aspect 

of this collection of information, 

including any of the following subjects: 

(1) The necessity and utility of the 

proposed information collection for the 

proper performance of the agency’s 

functions; (2) the accuracy of the 

estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (4) the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology to minimize the information 

collection burden. 

To obtain copies of the supporting 

statement and any related forms for the 

proposed paperwork collections 

referenced above, e-mail your request, 

including your address, phone number, 

OMB number, and OS document 

identifier, to 

Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call 

the Reports Clearance Office on (202) 

690–6162. Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collections must be directed 

to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer 

at the above email address within 60- 

days. 

Proposed Project: Evaluation of the 

Effectiveness of an Educational 

Interactive Video on Research 

Integrity—OMB No. 0990–New–Office 

of Research Integrity. 

Abstract: The Office of Research 

Integrity (ORI) proposes to conduct a 

nine-month evaluation study of the 

effectiveness of an educational 

interactive video on research integrity. 

The study seeks to answer two 

questions: (a) Objectively, is the 

Educational Interactive Video for 

Research Integrity (EIVRI) effective in 

achieving learning outcomes? (b) 

Subjectively, do learners and teachers 

perceive the video simulation as 

effective in helping them learn and 

teach research integrity? To answer the 

first question, a pretest-posttest control 

group experimental design is used to 

assess the effectiveness of individual 

learning of research integrity principles 

and concepts through the use of the 

video simulation. The video simulation 

instruction will be incorporated into an 

existing syllabus for a research integrity 

or research ethics course for the 

treatment group. The control group will 

use the existing syllabus with no video 

simulation in class. Participants will be 

graduate students enrolled in these 

ethics courses to learn and apply the 

responsible conduct of research at 

educational institutions. Participants 

will fill out a demographics form to 

discern if they have had prior training 

experience in research integrity. Those 

who have prior training experience and 

those who do not have prior training 

experience will be randomly assigned to 

either the treatment group or the control 

group. The random assignment will be 

done by picking the last digit of each 

individual’s social security number for 

the two groups. The video simulation 

will be approximately four-hour long 

total. All students will take a pre-test 

quiz when they fill out the 

demographics form. Once the treatment 

is completed, all students will be asked 

to take a post-test quiz and answer a 

post-viewing questionnaire to capture 

their perceptions of the video 

simulation. 

To answer the second question, the 

study will collect qualitative data from 

semi-structured interviews as well as 

focus groups. The semi-structured 

interviews will be conducted twice with 

faculty who teach the courses in the first 

part of the study, in person or on the 

phone, before and after he/she uses the 

video simulation. Participants for the 

focus groups will be selected from the 

students who participate in the first part 

of the study. The focus group will last 

one hour. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
10366 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE

Forms Type of respondent Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average burden (in hours) 

per response 

Total burden 

hours 

Demographics form ........................... Graduate students ............................ 200 1 20/60 67 

Pre-test questions ............................. Graduate students ............................ 200 1 30/60 100 

Ethics Instruction ............................... Graduate students ............................ 200 1 4 800 

Post-test questions ........................... Graduate students ............................ 200 1 30/60 100 

Post-viewing questionnaire ............... Graduate students ............................ 200 1 5/60 17 

Interview before use of video ........... Faculty .............................................. 10 1 6/60 1 

Interview after use of video .............. Faculty .............................................. 10 1 6/60 1 

Focus groups .................................... Graduate students ............................ 9 1 1 9 

Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 1,095 

Seleda Perryman, 

Office of the Secretary, HHS PRA Clearance 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4114 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150–31–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

[Document Identifier: OS–0990–New; 60-day 

Notice] 

Agency Information Collection 

Request; 60-Day Public Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS. 

In compliance with the requirement 

of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Office of the Secretary (OS), Department 

of Health and Human Services, is 

publishing the following summary of a 

proposed information collection request 

for public comment. Interested persons 

are invited to send comments regarding 

this burden estimate or any other aspect 

of this collection of information, 

including any of the following subjects: 

(1) The necessity and utility of the 

proposed information collection for the 

proper performance of the agency’s 

functions; (2) the accuracy of the 

estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (4) the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology to minimize the information 

collection burden. 

To obtain copies of the supporting 

statement and any related forms for the 

proposed paperwork collections 

referenced above, e-mail your request, 

including your address, phone number, 

OMB number, and OS document 

identifier, to 

Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call 

the Reports Clearance Office on (202) 

690–6162. Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collections must be directed 

to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer 

at the above email address within 60 

days. 

Proposed Project: Provide Services for 

the Dissemination of CER to Patients 

and Providers To Increase Adoption— 

OMB No. 0990–New–Office Within 

OS—Assistant Secretary for Planning 

and Evaluation (ASPE). 

Abstract: 

This research leverages best practices 

in behavior change, interaction design, 

and service innovation to increase the 

understanding and adoption of 

Comparative Effectiveness Research 

(CER) information by physicians and 

patients. By truly understanding the 

desires, behaviors and attitudes of 

patients and care providers across 

various segments, this project can 

significantly improve the dissemination, 

translation, and adoption of evidencebased, outcomes-oriented CER findings. 

Comparative Effectiveness Research 

(CER) aims to provide patients and their 

doctors with the best available evidence 

that has been gathered from scientific 

research to make effective healthcare 

decisions. CER provides the latest 

thinking and recommendations on the 

risks and benefits of treatment and 

diagnostics as well as the confidence of 

those recommendations. In addition, it 

addresses individual patient factors 

such as quality of life and lifestyle that 

are included when making decisions 

about medical options. Widespread 

adoption of CER would lead to better 

outcomes for medical treatment and, in 

some cases, reduced cost. 

The purpose of this project is ‘‘to 

strengthen the link between evidence 

production and strategies for conveying 

this information in ways that encourage 

evidence-based behavior change among 

providers and patients. The central 

question is how best to get CER 

information to physicians and patients 

in a way they understand. This task is 

considered critical to capitalizing on the 

Department’s CER investment.’’ This 

will be a one year generic clearance 

request. 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE

Type of respondent Form name Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(in hours) 

Total burden 

hours 

Practice .............................................. Form A: Demographics for target 

population and colon cancer 

screening rates.

10 2 4 80 

Healthcare Providers (Physicians, 

Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants and Nurses).

Form B: Tallies when use dashboard and/or show Web-based 

tool to patient in office.

40 563 1/60 375 

Individual/patients .............................. Form C: Experience Survey on 

web-based tool.

4750 1 3/60 238 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES