alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
155 So.2d 299

#### Ex parte Joseph L. TAYLOR.

3 Div. 80.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 27, 1963.

*347Joseph L. Taylor, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., for the State.

LAWSON, Justice.

Joseph L. Taylor, who is presently confined in Kilby Prison, has filed in this court an instrument which is captioned “Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus.”

The writ of habeas corpus issues from this court only when necessary in the exercise of the “general superintendence and control of inferior jurisdictions” with which it is clothed by § 140 of the Alabama Constitution. Ex parte Chaney, 8 Ala. 424; Ex parte Croom, 19 Ala. 561. See Ex parte Winnagle, 269 Ala. 668, 115 So.2d 261.

There are no facts averred in thednstant petition which 'would warrant the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus' by this court.

When a person is confined in the penitentiary, the petition for writ of habeas corpus must be addressed to the nearest circuit judge. Section 6, Title 15, Code 1940. Any “party aggrieved by the judgment on -the trial of a habeas corpus may appeal to the supreme court or court of appeals.” Section 369, Title 15, Code 1940.

We do not intend to imply that the matters of which Taylor complains will justify his release in a habeas corpus proceeding in any court. That question is not before us.

We deny the'writ on the ground that the petition fails to make out a case for its issuance under § 140 of the Constitution.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1936-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-1936-DR), dated September 13, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 4, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Mexico is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 13, 2010.

The Navajo Nation and the Pueblo of Acoma for Public Assistance.

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;                               ( print page 1626)                            97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2011-386 Filed 1-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

The Use of Seat-Strapping Method for Carrying a Wheelchair 

Rulemaking Document Title: on an Aircraft ^^ ^ 

RIN: 9ins-AnR7 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s): 

1. E.0.12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

__^^ ^ The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

^ No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OIRA, 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

' This document is not a final rule. 

_^^^ _ This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

J . ^ n 

Signature 

Name 

Title/Office 

05/26/2011
A Brief Description

of the

Three Distinct “Bi-Level” Passenger Car Designs

Currently in Use on the US “General System”

for the

Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee

Washington, DC, January 9 – 10, 2014

Prepared by J.D. Coran, Director of Operations and Product Development, Talgo, Inc. (Seattle)
The Term “Bi-Level” is Used to Describe 

Three Very Different Vehicles

• The Metra (Chicago area) Bi-Level

– Also used on Cal-Train(San Francisco area) and VRE (Northern Virginia) 

– More accurately described as a “Gallery” Car

2
The Term “Bi-Level” is Used to Describe 

Three Very Different Vehicles

• The Metra (Chicago area) Bi-Level

– Also used on Cal-Train(San Francisco area) and VRE (Northern Virginia) 

– More accurately described as a “Gallery” Car

• The Bombardier Bi-Level®

– Used by a dozen commuter operations in the south and west

– A low profile version is in use in the Northeast

– With three levels, better described as a “Multi-Level” car

3
The Term “Bi-Level” is Used to Describe 

Three Very Different Vehicles

• The Metra (Chicago area) Bi-Level

– Also used on Cal-Train(San Francisco area) and VRE (Northern Virginia) 

– More accurately described as a “Gallery” Car

• The Bombardier Bi-Level®

– Used by a dozen commuter operations in the south and west

– A low profile version is in use in the Northeast

– With three levels, better described as a “Multi-Level” car

• The Superliner/Surfliner /PRIIA Bi-Level

– Superliner: used by Amtrak on all Western routes

– Surfliner: used in California (a.k.a. “California Car”)

– PRIIA 305 Next Generation Equipment Committee Bi-Level

– More accurately described as a “High Level” Car

4
5

Conventional (Single Level) Car

a

c

b

d

Historical footnote:

In 1907 the design of the “wide vestibule”, 

then only six years old, was modified to allow 

the trap door to remain closed when the side 

door was opened. This change made high 

level platforms possible on tracks that were 

not used by freight trains. Soon after, 

Manhattan’s new Pennsylvania Station (1910) 

and Grand Central Terminal (1913) were built 

with this amenity. 
6

a

c

b

Gallery Car

c
7

a

c

Multi-Level Car

b
8

c

The Northeastern Multi-Level

N J Transit (NY Metro)

MTA Long Island Rail Road (New York) AMT (Montreal) 

MBTA (Boston)
9

c

High Level Car

a

MBTA (Boston)

b
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 33rd Helicopter Maintenance Unit Ensures Aircraft Are Ready to Deploy

By Senior Airman Omari Bernard18th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                      Three Months Ended    Nine months Ended
                                           March 31,             March 31,
                                        2003       2002       2003       2002
                                      --------   --------   --------   --------

Net Income                            $177,553   $240,065   $559,561   $610,462
                                      ========   ========   ========   ========

Weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation    370,338    363,975    366,065    363,975
                                      ========   ========   ========   ========
Basic earnings per share              $   0.48   $   0.66   $   1.53   $   1.68
                                      ========   ========   ========   ========

Weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation    370,338    363,975    366,065    363,975

Common stock equivalents due to
  dilutive effect of stock options         714      3,054        641      3,908
                                      --------   --------   --------   --------
Weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for
  diluted computation                  371,052    367,029    366,706    367,883
                                      ========   ========   ========   ========
Diluted earnings per share            $   0.48   $   0.65   $   1.53   $   1.66
                                      ========   ========   ========   ========
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 11th Airborne Division Hosts Historic All-women Jump  

By Senior Airman Patrick Sullivan673d ABW/PA

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
### **CHAPTER 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS**

Sec.
101.
Definitions.
102.
Rules of construction.
103.
Applicability of chapters.
104.
Adjustment of dollar amounts.
105.
Power of court.
106.
Waiver of sovereign immunity.
107.
Public access to papers.
108.
Extension of time.
109.
Who may be a debtor.
110.
Penalty for persons who negligently or fraudulently prepare bankruptcy petitions.
111.
Nonprofit budget and credit counseling agencies; financial management instructional courses.
112.
Prohibition on disclosure of name of minor children.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–8, title I, §106(e)(2), title II, §233(b), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 41, 74, added items 111 and 112.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–394, title III, §308(b), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4137, added item 110.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LIL MARC, INC.
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
              1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
              TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                          <C>                      
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS                    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,027          
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,027          
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,816
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,216
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,630)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,630)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
### §8749a. Civil service mariners of Military Sealift Command: alcohol testing

The Secretary of the Navy may prescribe regulations establishing a program to conduct on-duty reasonable suspicion alcohol testing and post-accident alcohol testing of civil service mariners of the Military Sealift Command who are assigned to vessels.

(Added §7479a and renumbered §8749a, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(6), title XI, §1114(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836, 2013; amended Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVII, §1731(a)(60)(B), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1815.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–92 capitalized "Military Sealift Command" in section catchline.

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §807(d)(6), renumbered section 7479a of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by section 807(d)(6) of Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### [§2327. Renumbered §4871]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2327 was renumbered section 2347 of this title.
#### John W. Hanna, Doing Business as Hanna & Company, Respondent, v. Charles S. Spiegelberg and Others, Partners Doing Business as L. Spiegelberg & Sons, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OW- 2010 - 0288

May 19, 2010 The contents of the following docket are hereb y i ncorporated b y reference into and is considered to be included in, contained in, and to have been placed in Docket EPA - HQ OW - 2010 - 02 88 (Expedited Approval of Alternative Test Procedures for the Anal ys is of Contaminants Under the Safe Drinking Water Act; Analysis and Sampling Procedures) Docket EPA - HQ - OW - 2002 - 0061 (National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Ground Water Rule) Acce ssing Dockets: Publicly available docket materials are available either electronicall y through http://www.regulations.gov/ or in hard cop y at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room 33 34, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566 - 1744, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is (202) 566 - 2426.
United States Steel Corporation

– Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2012
**Item 7** The facility 's Best Available Retrofit Technology report, available on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Regional Haze website ("BART report"), discusses the low efficiency of the facility 's wet scrubbers for SO2. Provide all documentation, inc luding reports and studies, to determine the current SO2 efficiency of all water scrubbers at the facility

. Additionally , provide all documents, including reports and studies, completed for the technical feasibility of efficiency

upgrades for each scrubber

. **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation of the response:**  Stephani Campbell , Chrissy Bartovich , Jason Barta **Answer:** A stack test report submitted as part of this resp onse dated July 2006 includes a performance evaluation of the Keetac scrubber (SV051) and SO 2 removal efficiency at various scrubber pH levels

. (Please refer to the I tem 5 Subfolder for the report.) Increasing the pH with lime increased the SO 2 removal e fficiency . However, the addition of too much lime can lead to potential operational issues with the scrubber b y forming excess scale inside the scrubber. The scale can lead to decreased water flow and ultimately the line will need to shut down to clean t he scrubber out. Please r efer to the Minntac submittal for other additional information relating to this item.
### Metamorphism of the Belt series in the Elk River-Clarkia area, Idaho

By: Anna Hietanen

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp344C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### In the Matter of Richard R.G., Appellant, v Rebecca H., Respondent.

[825 NYS2d 597]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret O. Szczur, J.), entered January 10, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the petition to modify an order of visitation and again referred the parties to the Catholic Charities Therapeutic Supervised Visitation Program.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order denying his petition for modification of an order of visitation and again referring the parties to the Catholic Charities Therapeutic Supervised Visitation Program. Insofar as petitioner sought a hearing on the issue whether visitation should be transferred to the Salvation Army Supervised Visitation Program, Family Court properly denied the petition without a hearing. It is well settled that “[o]ne who seeks to modify an existing order of visitation is not automatically entitled to a hearing, but must make some evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant it” *(Matter of Timson v Timson,*5 AD3d 691, 692 [2004]). Here, petitioner “failed to provide any evidence to demonstrate a change of circumstances” that would warrant the nontherapeutic supervised visitation at the Salvation Army sought by him rather than the therapeutic supervised visitation at Catholic Charities deemed appropriate by the court *(Matter of Goldberg v Goldberg,*300 AD2d 585, 586 [2002]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.EJ., Scudder, Gorski, Centra and Green, JJ.
#### § 39.214 What is the minimum number of instructional hours required in order to be considered a full-time educational program?

A full time program provides the following number of instructional/student hours to the corresponding grade level:

| Grade | Hours |
| --- | --- |
| K | 720 |
| 1-3 | 810 |
| 4-8 | 900 |
| 9-12 | 970 |