### 76327 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices

purchaser-consumers. Some refiners are importers but that is not always the

case. Respondent’s obligation to respond: Mandatory per 40 CFR part 80.

Estimated number of respondents: 4,283.

Frequency of response: Quarterly, Annually, on Occasion.

Total estimated burden: 127,246 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b)

T otal estimated cost: $39,223,076 (per year), includes $24,713,032 in non-labor
costs.

Changes in Estimates: Compared with the ICR currently approved by OMB, there is an increase in the total estimated burden. The increase from 127,041 hours to 127,246 hours is because additional regulations that were introduced through rule making.

Courtney Kerwin, Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–29791 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OECA–2014–0085; FRL—9918– 70–OEI]** 

**Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and**  **Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Friction Materials Manufacture**  **(Renewal)**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ‘‘NESHAP for Friction Materials Manufacture (40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQQ) (Renewal)’’ (EPA ICR No. 2025.06, OMB Control No. 2060–0481) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq). This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through January 31, 2015. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register (79 FR 30117) on May 27, 2014 during a 60- day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. **DATES :**  Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 21, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA HQ– OECA–2014–0085, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or by email to docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to oira

_submission@omb.eop.gov. Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for EPA.

EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Patrick Yellin, Monitoring, Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564–2970; fax number: (202) 564–0050; email address: yellin.patrick@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Supporting documents which explain in detail the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is 202–566–1744. For additional information about EPA’s public docket, visit: http:// www.epa.gov/dockets.

Abstract: Respondents are owners or operators of friction materials manufacturing facilities. The NESHAP contains an emission limitation for solvent mixers at friction materials manufacturing facilities. Solvent mixers are the affected source. Friction materials manufacturing facilities manufacture friction material using a solvent-based process. Friction material is subsequently used to manufacture friction products that include, but are not limited to, disc brake pucks, disc brake pads, brake linings, brake shoes, brake segments, brake blocks, brake discs, clutch facings, and clutches.

Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities: Owners or operators of friction materials manufacturing facilities. Respondent’s obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQQ).

Estimated number of respondents: 4 (total).

Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually, and annually.

Total estimated burden: 1,291 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).

Total estimated cost: $127,502 (per year), includes $1,088 in annualized capital and/or operation & maintenance
costs.

Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of five hours in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by the OMB. This decrease is due to a discrepancy identified in the previous ICR. The previous ICR assumed all existing plants transmit one-time notifications, a burden item that only applies to new sources. Since no new sources are expected over the next three-year period of the ICR, the ICR was revised to remove this burden, which resulted in a decrease in burden hours.

There is also an increase in the estimated burden cost due to the use of updated labor rates. This ICR references the most recent labor rates available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the OPM to calculate burden costs.

Courtney Kerwin, Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–29792 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9920–57–OEI]**

**Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision**  **Approval, State of Minnesota**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces EPA’s approval of the State of Minnesota’s request to revise/modify certain of its EPA-authorized programs to allow electronic reporting.

**DATES :**  EPA’s approval is effective December 22, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,


### 76328 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices

Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1175, seeh.karen@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving, electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic reporting. Additionally, 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place of proceduresavailable under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements. Once an authorized program has EPA’s approval to accept electronic documents under certain programs, CROMERR 3.1000(a)(4) requires that the program keep EPA apprised of any changes to laws, policies, or the electronic document receiving systems that have the potential to affect the program’s compliance with CROMERR 3.2000.

On June 24, 2014, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) submitted an amended application titled ‘‘Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Regulatory Services Portal’’ forrevisions/modifications of its EPAapproved electronic reporting program under its EPA-authorized programs under title 40 CFR to allow new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed MPCA’s request to revise/modify its EPA-authorized programs and, based on this review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of authorized program revisions/modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision to approve Minnesota’s request to revise/modify its following EPA-authorized programs to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR parts 51, 60–61, 63, 65, 68, 70–72, 74–75, 79– 80, 82, 86, 89–92, 94, 122, 262, 264–266, 268, 270, 280, and 403, is being published in the Federal Register: Part 52—Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Part 60—Standards of Performance for

New Stationary Sources; Part 61—National Emission Standard for

Hazardous Air Pollutants; Part 63—National Emission Standards

for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories; Part 65—Consolidated Federal Air Rule; Part 68—Chemical Accident Prevention

Provisions; Part 70—State Operating Permit

Programs; Part 72—Permits Regulation; Part 74—Sulfur Dioxide OPT–INS; Part 75—Continuous Emissions

Monitoring; Part 79—Registration of Fuels and Fuel

Additives; Part 80—Registration of Fuels and Fuel

Additives; Part 82—Protection of Stratospheric

Ozone; Part 86—Control of Emissions from New

and In-Use Highway Vehicles and Engines; Part 89—Control of Emissions from New

and In-Use Non-road CompressionIgnition Engines; Part 90—Control Of Emissions From

Non-road Spark-Ignition Engines at Or Below 19 Kilowatts; Part 91—Control of Emissions from

Marine Spark-Ignition Engines; Part 94—Control of Emissions from

Marine Compression-Ignition Engines; Part 123— State Program Requirements; Part 271—Requirements for

Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Programs; Part 282—Approved Underground

Storage Tank Programs; and Part 403—General Pretreatment

Regulations for Existing and New Sources of Pollution.
MPCA was notified of EPA’s determination to approve its application with respect to the authorized programs listed above.

Matthew Leopardreyreh, Acting Director, Office of Information Collection.
[FR Doc. 2014–29483 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**[FRL 9920–69-Region 6]**

**Final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General**  **Permit for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems in the Middle Rio**  **Grande Watershed in New Mexico (NMR04A000)** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Final NPDES general permit issuance.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 Water Quality Protection Division, today announces issuance of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit for storm water discharges from municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) located in the Middle Rio Grande Watershed in the State of New Mexico. The permit offers discharge authorization to regulated MS4s within the boundaries of the Bureau of the Census-designated 2000 and 2010 Albuquerque Urbanized Areas and any other MS4s in the watershed designated by the Director as needing a MS4 permit. This permit is intended to replace both the individual NPDES Permit NMS000101 issued on January 31, 2012, and the expired general permits NMR040000 and NMR04000I for dischargers in this watershed area.

EPA Region 6 proposed the draft permit in the Federal Register on May 1, 2013. EPA Region 6 has considered all comments received and has made changes to the proposed permit. A copy of the EPA Region 6’s response to comments, a final fact sheet, and the final permit may be obtained from the EPA Region 6 internet site: http:// epa.gov/region6/water/npdes/sw/ms4/ index.htm

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ms. Evelyn Rosborough, Region 6, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Telephone: (214) 665–7515.

**DATES :**  This permit is effective on, and is deemed issued for the purpose of judicial review, December 22, 2014 and expires December 19, 2019. Under section 509(b) of the CWA, judicial review of this general permit can be held by filing a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals within 120 days after the permit is considered issued for judicial review. Under section 509(b)(2) of the CWA, the requirements in this permit may not be challenged later in civil or criminal proceedings to enforce these