alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §980. Limitation on use of humans as experimental subjects

(a) Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense may not be used for research involving a human being as an experimental subject unless—

(1) the informed consent of the subject is obtained in advance; or

(2) in the case of research intended to be beneficial to the subject, the informed consent of the subject or a legal representative of the subject is obtained in advance.

(b)(1) The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in this section with respect to a specific research project to advance the development of a medical product necessary to the armed forces if the research project may directly benefit the subject and is carried out in accordance with all other applicable laws.

(2) The Secretary may delegate the authority provided by paragraph (1) to the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering.

(Added Pub. L. 98–525, title XIV, §1401(c)(1), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2615; amended Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title VII, §733, Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1170; Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title II, §212, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 183.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(h) [title VIII, §8029], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1904, 1929.

Pub. L. 98–212, title VII, §734, Dec. 8, 1983, 97 Stat. 1444.

Pub. L. 97–377, title I, §101(c) [title VII, §737], Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1833, 1857.

Pub. L. 97–114, title VII, §738, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1585.

Pub. L. 96–527, title VII, §739, Dec. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 3088.

Pub. L. 96–154, title VII, §741, Dec. 21, 1979, 93 Stat. 1159.

Pub. L. 95–457, title VIII, §841, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1251.

Pub. L. 95–111, title VIII, §840, Sept. 21, 1977, 91 Stat. 906.

Pub. L. 94–419, title VII, §739, Sept. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 1297.

Pub. L. 94–212, title VII, §740, Feb. 9, 1976, 90 Stat. 175.

Pub. L. 93–437, title VIII, §841, Oct. 8, 1974, 88 Stat. 1231.

Pub. L. 93–238, title VII, §743, Jan. 2, 1974, 87 Stat. 1045.

Pub. L. 92–570, title VII, §745, Oct. 26, 1972, 86 Stat. 1203.

#### Amendments

2023—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 118–31 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

2001—Pub. L. 107–107 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 1404 of Pub. L. 98–525, set out as a note under section 520b of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2196-2197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Assistance Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer 
Income Tax Assistance Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 8, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Assistance Project Committee will be held Tuesday, February 8, 2011, at 
2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Donna Powers. For more information, please contact Ms. 
Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write TAP Office, 1000 
South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or contact us 
at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS Issues.


[[Page 2197]]


    Dated: January 5, 2011.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel
[FR Doc. 2011-419 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Howard National Bank *v.*Gordon.

[No. 11,931.

Filed November 14, 1924.]

From Tipton Circuit Court; *James M. Purvis,*Judge.

Action between the Howard National Bank and Alfred E. Gordon. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals. *Affirmed.*

*John B. Joyce,*for appellant.

*Fred J. Byers,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.
|                               |
|-------------------------------|
|                               |  |
|                          | July 20, 2015 |
| Media Contact:                |   |
| Casey Lassiter, 205 410-2777  |   |
|                          |   |
| Investor Relations Contact:   |   |
| Mary Ann Arico, 205 969-6175  |   |
| maryann.arico@healthsouth.com |   |
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRecalibration of the Shear Stress Transport Model to Improve Calculation of Shock Separated FlowsThe Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST) k . turbulence model is one of the most widely used two-equation Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence models for aerodynamic analyses. The model extends Menter s baseline (BSL) model to include a limiter that prevents the calculated turbulent shear stress from exceeding a prescribed fraction of the turbulent kinetic energy via a proportionality constant, a1, set to 0.31. Compared to other turbulence models, the SST model yields superior predictions of mild adverse pressure gradient flows including those with small separations. In shock - boundary layer interaction regions, the SST model produces separations that are too large while the BSL model is on the other extreme, predicting separations that are too small. In this paper, changing a1 to a value near 0.355 is shown to significantly improve predictions of shock separated flows. Several cases are examined computationally and experimental data is also considered to justify raising the value of a1 used for shock separated flows.Document ID20130011519Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGeorgiadis, Nicholas J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Yoder, Dennis A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 27, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 2013Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberE-18639NASA/TM-2013-217851AIAA Paper 2013-0685Meeting InformationMeeting: 51st AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and ExhibitLocation: Dallas, TXCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 7, 2013End Date: January 10, 2013Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 794072.02.03.02.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20130011519.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20150009936See AlsoRecalibration of the Shear Stress Transport Model to Improve Calculation of Shock Separated Flowsvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4426]



[[Page 11835]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12477 and <greek-i>12478]


Oregon Disaster <greek-i>OR-00036

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oregon (FEMA-1956-
DR), dated 02/17/2011.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm, Flooding, Mudslides, Landslides, and 
Debris Flows.
    Incident Period: 01/13/2011 through 01/21/2011.
    Effective Date: 02/17/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/18/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/17/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 02/17/2011, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties: Clackamas, Clatsop, Crook, Douglas, Lincoln, 
Tillamook.
    The Interest Rates are:

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Percent
----------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
    Non-Profit Organizations      3.250
     With Credit Available
     Elsewhere..............
    Non-Profit Organizations      3.000
     Without Credit
     Available Elsewhere....
For Economic Injury:
    Non-Profit Organizations      3.000
     Without Credit
     Available Elsewhere....
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12477B 
and for economic injury is 12478B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-4426 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

Protectin g America ' s Pension s 1200 K Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20005-4026 

M A Y 3 201 8 

T h e Presiden t 

T h e Whit e Hous e 

Washington , D.C . 2050 0 

Dea r Mr . President : 

W e ar e please d t o submi t th e Pensio n Benefi t Guarant y Corporation' s F Y actuaria l 

evaluatio n o f th e expecte d operation s an d stahis o f th e PBG C fund s a s require d b y Sectio n 400 8 

o f th e Employe e Retiremen t Incom e Securit y Act . Thi s repor t complete s ou r Annua l fo r 

F Y 2017 . 

Sincerely , 

R . ALEXANDE R ACOST A 

Secretar y o f Labo r 

Chai r o f th e Boar d 

W . THOMA S REEDE R 

Directo r 

Enclosur e 
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporati 

1200 Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20005-4026 

M A Y 3 201 8 

T h e Honorabl e Michae l Penc e 

Presiden t o f th e Senat e 

Washington , D.C . 2051 0 

Dea r Mr . President : 

W e ar e please d t o submi t th e Pensio n Benefi t Guarant y Corporation' s F Y actuaria l 

evaluatio n o f th e expecte d operation s an d statu s o f th e PBG C fund s a s require d b y Sectio n 400 8 

o f th e Employe e Retiremen t Incom e Securit y Act . Thi s repor t complete s ou r Annua l Repor t fo r 

F Y 2017 . 

Sincerely , 

R . ALEXANDE R ACOST A 

Secretar y o f Labo r 

Chai r o f th e Boar d 

W . THOMA S REEDE R 

Directo r 

Enclosur e 
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporati 

1200 K Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20005-4026 

MAY 3 1 2018 

T h e Honorabl e Pau l D . Rya n 

Speake r o f th e U.S . Hous e o f 

Representative s 

Washington , D.C . 2051 5 

Dea r Mr . Speaker : 

W e ar e please d t o submi t th e Pensio n Benefi t Guarant y Corporation' s F Y actuaria l 

evaluatio n o f th e expecte d operation s an d statu s o f th e PBG C fund s a s require d b y Sectio n 400 8 

o f th e Employe e Retiremen t Incom e Securit y Act . Thi s repor t complete s ou r Annua l Repor t fo r 

F Y 2017 . 

Sincerely , 

R . ACOST A 

Secretar y o f Labo r 

Chai r o f th e Boar d 

W . THOMA S REEDE R 

Directo r 

Enclosur e
```

Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Guthrie, Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
     the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 Date: August 14, 2003   /S/ David Guthrie
                             Principal Executive Officer
                             Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 9, 2018

No. 04-18-00307-CR

Christian HART,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-05-00037-CRK

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After we granted court reporter Leticia M. Escamilla’s first and second motions for 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record, the record was due on August 8, 2018. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 35.3(c). On the second extended due date, the court reporter filed a third request for 

an extension of time to file the record until September 5, 2018. 

The reporter’s request is GRANTED. We ORDER court reporter Leticia M. Escamilla to 

file the reporter’s record with this court by September 5, 2018. See id.

NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD 

WILL BE GRANTED.

If the reporter’s record is not filed as ordered, a SHOW CAUSE ORDER may issue 

directing Leticia M. Escamilla to appear on a day certain and show cause why she should not be 

held in contempt for failing to file the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c); see also TEX. GOV’T 

CODE ANN. § 21.002 (West 2004) (authorizing contemnor punishment up to “a fine of not more 

than $500 or confinement in the county jail for not more than six months, or both such a fine and 

confinement in jail”); Johnson v. State, 151 S.W.3d 193, 195–96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (noting 

the court’s previous action holding a court reporter in contempt for “repeatedly fail[ing] to 

prepare and file the record” and “order[ing] him incarcerated . . . until the record was finished”).
The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Leticia M. 

Escamilla by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to addressee only, 

or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of August, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
P.1 

/oi(io) f fR-S-^j 

UNION 

CARBIDE 

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION 39 OLD HDGEBURY ROAD, DANBURY, CT06817-0001 

Corporate Health, Safety and Environmental Affairs Department 

July 25, 1986 

Ms. Barbara Hostage 

Emergency Response Division 

WH-458/B 

Environmental Protection Agency 

401 M Street, SW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Barbara: 

I would like to thank you and your associates from EPA for meeting with 

me and other members of industry on July 18, 1986, to discuss the technical 

issues involved in the planned regulatory efforts on the "continuous release" 

and "federally permitted" issues as defined in the CERCLA statute. I found 

the meeting to be a very informative and worthwhile activity. Such dialogue 

between EPA and the regulated community early in the scoping and definition 

process can and should provide a basis for reasonable, effective and practical 

regulations and, at the same time, facilitate the entire rulemaking process. 

I understand that future meetings on this subject are at industry's 

initiative and I plan to recommend such action to my counterparts in the 

industry. 

Sincerely yours, 

RFK/vrm 

0432G 

cc: B. Cardillo/B. L.Taranto - Exxon Chemical 

T. Lingafelter - Dow Chemical 

M. Mullins - Monsanto Chemical 

W. H. Walsh - E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co.
#### Lawrence Olsen, Respondent, v. The New York and Long Island Traction Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, P. J., not voting.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 591 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 26, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 109) making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 
2001, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be considered as read 
for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 626 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 307
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 626

                          [Report No. 106-973]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4392) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for 
 intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States 
     Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central 
  Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2000

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4392) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for 
 intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States 
     Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central 
  Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4392) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for intelligence 
and intelligence-related activities of the United States Government, 
the Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency 
Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 307

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 626

                          [Report No. 106-973]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4392) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for 
 intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States 
     Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central 
  Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 11, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1925

CHARLES W. PENLAND, Sr.; MARY PENLAND, Wife, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants, 

 v. 

COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG, South Carolina; STATE OF SOUTH 

CAROLINA; JERRY SAAD, Court Appointed Receiver; RMC OFFICE 

OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY, South Carolina; SOUTH CAROLINA 

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District 

Judge. (6:07-cv-03288-HMH) 

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008 

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland appeal the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See Penland v. County of Spartanburg, No. 6:07-

cv-03288-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED