alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Correspondence Exam Toll Free Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/
Self Employed Correspondence Exam Toll Free Project Committee will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 26, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Shepard at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6095.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Correspondence Exam Toll Free Project Committee will be held 
Tuesday, April 26, 2011, at 9 a.m., Pacific Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Timothy 
Shepard. For more information please contact Mr. Shepard at 1-888-912-
1227 or 206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, 
Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-4309 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### §893. Art. 93. Cruelty and maltreatment

Any person subject to this chapter who is guilty of cruelty toward, or oppression or maltreatment of, any person subject to his orders shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 68.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 893 | 50:687. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 93), 64 Stat. 136. |
#### § 47.8 Who develops the local educational financial plans?

The local Bureau-operated school supervisor develops the local educational financial plan in active consultation with the local school board, based on the tentative allotment received.
#### § 700.309 Presiding officers.

The hearing shall be presided over and conducted by one of the Commissioners appointed pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 640d-11(b) or by such other person as the Commission may designate.
#### § 700.545 Alcoholism and drug abuse.

An employee who habitually uses intoxicants to excess is subject to removal (5 U.S.C. 7352). The Relocation Commission recognizes alcoholism and drug abuse as serious and treatable illnesses. Excessive absence and poor work performance are two of the specific problems resulting from excessive use of alcohol and drugs. The Commission management will assist any employee who has such a problem to obtain professional help and will make reasonable allowance as permitted by work schedules to allow an employee approved leave for professional treatment. Anyone who seeks such assistance will be guaranteed confidential handling of his or her case. Disciplinary action will be considered if an employee rejects or ignores treatment or other appropriate assistance.
#### § 293.6 Who can submit a compact or amendment?

Either party (Tribe or State) to a compact or amendment can submit the compact or amendment to the Secretary for review and approval.
§ 48.108 How will the Bureau determine appropriate consideration for a lease? The Bureau will determine what consideration is appropriate for a lease by considering, at a minimum, the following factors: ( a ) Fair market value and the indirect and direct costs of the lease; and
( b ) Whether there will be a net financial benefit to the school.
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Guidance Document Database 
-  Asset Reversion 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Asset reversion

                  -  Opinion Letter 89-01
PBGC’s position requiring distribution of assets as soon as practicable after PBGC’s 60-day review does not apply to surplus assets when there is a dispute concerning distribution.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 85-11
A split-up of one plan and the termination of another is not subject to the asset reversion implementation guidelines; PBGC recognizes the termination and reestablishment of a plan.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 85-25
Implementation guidelines do not generally apply to a transfer of assets from a single-employer plan to a multiemployer plan, followed by the termination of the single-employer plan, but because plan termination is a prerequisite to a reversion of plan assets to an employer, PBGC will not recognize a plan termination when it is intended as a means to recover surplus plan assets without satisfying termination requirements.  
-               document
120 STAT. 3392 PUBLIC LAW 109–457—DEC. 22, 2006

Public Law 109–457

109th Congress

An Act

To direct the Secretary of Interior to convey certain Bureau of Land Management

Land to the City of Eugene, Oregon.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eugene Land Conveyance Act’’.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the city of Eugene,

Oregon.

(2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary

of the Interior.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c), the

Secretary shall convey to the City, without consideration and subject

to all valid existing rights, all right, title, and interest of the

United States in and to the land described in subsection (b)(1)

for the purposes of—

(1) establishing a wildlife viewing area; and

(2) the construction and operation of an environmental

education center.

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The land referred to in subsection (a)

is the parcel of approximately 12 acres of land under the

administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management

in Lane County, Oregon, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘West

Eugene Wetlands Land Transfer’’ and dated April 11, 2005.

(2) SURVEY.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The legal description of the land

described in paragraph (1) may be based on the survey

of the land completed in 1979.

(B) COST.—If the Secretary determines that a new

survey of the land is required, the City shall be responsible

for paying the cost of the survey.

(c) REVERSION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary determines that the land

conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used for the purposes

described in that subsection—

(A) all right, title, and interest in and to the land

(including any improvements to the land) shall, at the

Eugene Land

Conveyance Act.

Dec. 22, 2006

[S. 2150]

PUBLIC LAW 109–457—DEC. 22, 2006 120 STAT. 3393

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2150:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–306 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 8, considered and passed House.

Æ

discretion of the Secretary, revert to the United States;

and

(B) the United States shall have the right of immediate

entry to the land.

(2) HEARING.—Any determination of the Secretary under

paragraph (1) shall be made on the record after an opportunity

for a hearing.

(d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may

require such additional terms and conditions for the conveyance

under subsection (a) as the Secretary determines to be appropriate

to protect the interests of the United States.

Approved December 22, 2006.
### §7627. Supplies: educational institutions

Under such regulations as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe, supplies and military publications procured for the Army may be sold to any educational institution to which an officer of the Army is detailed as professor of military science and tactics, for the use of its military students. Sales under this section shall be for cash.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 259, §4627; renumbered §7627, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4627 | 10:1179 (less proviso). | July 17, 1914, ch. 149 (less proviso), 38 Stat. 512. |

The words "procured for" are substituted for the words "as are furnished to". The words "stores * * * matériel of war" are omitted as covered by the word "supplies". The words "the price listed to the Army" are omitted to reflect Title IV of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended (63 Stat. 585), which authorized the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations governing the use and sale of certain inventories at cost, including applicable administrative expenses. (See opinion of the Assistant General Counsel (Fiscal Matters) of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, January 4, 1955.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4627 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### [§1063a. Renumbered §1064]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00804-CV

LONE STAR BAKERY, INC. and Lone Star Bakery of San Antonio, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Tomas DE LA GARZA,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-13819

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is REVERSED 

and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court with instructions to sign an order compelling 

arbitration between the parties and staying all other proceedings pending the outcome of 

arbitration. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 171.021 (West 2011). 

Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellee Tomas De La Garza.

SIGNED August 27, 2014.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Joseph Jacobs, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of Consolidated Energy, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date:  December 5, 2006 /s/  Joseph Jacobs Joseph Jacobs Chief Operating Officer and Principal Executive Officer
#### § 290.10 Is an Indian tribe in violation of IGRA if it makes per capita payments to its members from net gaming revenues without an approved tribal revenue allocation plan?

Yes, you are in violation of IGRA if you make per capita payments to your tribal members from net gaming revenues without an approved tribal revenue allocation plan. If you refuse to comply, the DOJ or NIGC may enforce the per capita requirements of IGRA.
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 6,

2014.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00895

- CR

JOSE DEJESUS ACOSTA , JR

. , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

For t Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11

- DCR

- 058827B



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On September 24, 2013, appellant filed a notice of appeal from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Appellant also filed a motion
for new trial on October 16 , 2013. A supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order signed December 5, 2013, granting appellant’s motion for new
trial has now been filed in this appeal

. When a trial court grants a motion for new trial, it restores the case to its2

pos ition before the former trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.9. Because there is no
sentence to appeal, we have no jurisdiction over this appeal. See Waller v. State
, 931 S.W.2d 643 , 643

– 44 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1996, no pet.). On February 3, 2014, appellant’s counse l filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because the trial court has granted a new trial on punishment, we suspend Rule 42.2’s requirement for appellant’s signature on the
motion to dismiss. See Tex. R. App. P. 2.
Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Wise. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
### [§720. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(g)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2103]

Section, added Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §501(9)(A), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2907, related to appointment of Chief of Staff to President.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Drug AbuseWarning Network ... Area profiles of drug-related mortality**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.416/4:
ItemNumber:0497-D-45(online)
CGPSystem Number:000598191
 
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
 
 **
§ 585.4 Are motions permitted? ( a ) Only motions for extension of time under § 580.4(f) of this subchapter, motions to supplement the record under § 581.5 of this subchapter, motions to intervene under § 585.5, and motions for reconsideration under § 581.6 of this subchapter, are permitted.
( b ) The Chair shall not, either individually or through counsel, file or respond to motions.
[77 FR 58945, Sept. 25, 2012, as amended at 87 FR 76929, Dec. 16, 2022]
#### § 161.4 To what lands does this part apply?

The grazing regulations in this part apply to the Navajo Partitioned Lands within the boundaries of the Navajo Indian Reservation held in trust by the United States for the Navajo Nation. Contiguous areas outside of the Navajo Partitioned Lands may be included under this part for management purposes by BIA in consultation with the affected permittees and other affected land users, and with the concurrence of the Resources Committee. Other affected land users include those holding approved assignments, permits, leases, and rights of way for activities such as: home sites, farm plots, roads, utilities, businesses, and schools.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - NeighborWorks America

#  NeighborWorks America 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Aug, 2017

**Description:**
Neighbor works America works through partnerships, public and private, to drive change at the local level for individuals, families, and communities. The official site covers information on training services and professional development certificate programs on the topics of home, finance, community and non-profit organization management.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal

**Creator:**    	    Neighbor Works America

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (9 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://www.linkedin.com/company/neighborworks-america/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     http://www.neighborworks.org

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://plus.google.com/115511390066095466912/posts/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/neighborworks/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/NeighborWorksAmerica/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.flickr.com/photos/neighborworksamerica/collections/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.instagram.com/neighborworks/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/NeighborWorksAmerica/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/NeighborWorksAmerica/videos

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (9 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
#### Thomas Mullen, Respondent, v. State Line Telephone Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 02

- 00 274

- CV

Billy Bob Aldridge and Allegheny Mutual Casualty Co. dba Alamo Bail Bonds, Surety , Appellants

v.

State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 01

- 091

- C277 , HONORABLE MICHAEL JERGINS , JUDGE PRESIDING

The trial court signed a final judgment on January 3, 2002. On February 1, appellants Billy

Bob Aldr idge and Allegheny Mutual Casualty Co. dba Alamo Bail Bonds, Surety, filed a motion for new
trial. On April 18, they filed their notice of appeal. On May 15, this Court sent appellants a letter informing
them that the notice of appeal appeared to be unti mely, requesting a response by May 28, and notifying
them that a failure to respond timely would result in the appeal = s dismissal. On July 3, appellee the State of
Texas filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. To date, appellants have not responded to the Court = s letter.We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). We

dismiss appellee =

s motion to dismiss.

Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: July 26, 2002

Do Not Publish