alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 700.243 Action on initial requests. ( a ) *Granting of requests.* ( 1 ) A requested record shall be made available if ( i ) the record is not exempt from disclosure or
( ii ) the record is exempt from disclosure, but its withholding is neither required by statute or Executive order nor supported by sound grounds.
( b ) *Form of grant.* ( 1 ) When a requested record has been determined to be available, the official processing the request shall immediately notify the person requesting the record as to where and when the record is available for inspection or as the case may be, where and when copies will be available. If fees are due under § 700.251, the responsible official shall also state the amount or, if the exact amount cannot be determined, the approximate amount of fees due.
( 2 ) If the record was obtained by the Commission from a person or entity outside of the Government, the responsible official shall, when it is administratively feasible to do so, notify that person or entity that the record has been made available.
( c ) *Denial of requests.* ( 1 ) A request for a record may be denied only if it is determined that ( i ) the record is exempt from disclosure and
( ii ) that withholding of the record is required by statute or Executive order or supported by sound grounds.
( 2 ) A request to inspect or copy a record shall be denied only by the Freedom of Information Act Officer or by an official whom the Executive Director has in writing designated.
( d ) *Form of denial.* A reply denying a request shall be in writing and shall include: ( 1 ) A reference to the specific exemption or exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act authorizing the withholding of the record;
( 2 ) The sound ground for withholding;
( 3 ) A listing of the names and titles or positions of each person responsible for the denial;
( 4 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed to the Commission pursuant to § 700.247 and that such appeal must be in writing and be received by this official within twenty (20) days (Saturdays, Sundays, and public legal holidays excepted) after the date of the denial, in the case of the denial of an entire request, or within twenty (20) days (Saturdays, Sundays, and public legal holidays excepted) of records being made available, in the case of a partial denial, by writing to the Freedom of Information Act Officer, Navajo-Hopi Indian Relocation Commission, P.O. Box KK, Flagstaff, Arizona 86002.
( e ) *Exception.* The requirements of paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section do not apply to requests denied under § 2.14 on the ground that the request did not reasonably describe the records requested or to requests for records which do not exist.
( f ) *Filing of denials.* Copies of all replies denying, in whole or part, a request for a record which are issued under this section of § 700.243 shall be promptly submitted by the Freedom of Information Act Officer, denials to the Executive Director and the Commission's legal counsel.
§ 183.13 What would cause the Secretary to disapprove a request? We will only disapprove a request for distribution of income from the Lease Fund if the request does any of the following: ( a ) Fails to provide the documents identified in § 183.5;
( b ) Fails to provide reports required under §§ 183.15 and 183.16; or
( c ) Includes a use requested or written budget that does not comply with a specific provision of the Settlement Act or this part.
§ 514.14 What happens if the fees imposed exceed the statutory maximum or if the Commission does not expend the full amount of fees collected in a fiscal year? ( a ) The total amount of all fees imposed during any fiscal year shall not exceed the statutory maximum imposed by Congress. The Commission shall credit pro-rata any fees collected in excess of this amount against amounts otherwise due.
( b ) To the extent that revenue derived from fees imposed under the rates of fees established under § 514.2 are not expended or committed at the close of any fiscal year, such funds shall remain available until expended to defray the costs of operations of the Commission.
EXHIBIT 32



Section 906 Certification



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Host Marriott Corporation, the sole general
partner of Host Marriott, L.P., hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Host Marriott, L.P. (the Company) for the period ended March 26, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and



(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 4, 2004



/s/ Christopher J. NassettaChristopher J. Nassetta Chief Executive Officer/s/ W. Edward WalterW. Edward Walter Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 493

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued honoring the Fisk Jubilee Singers, and

that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the

Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 2000

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

a commemorative postage stamp should be issued honoring the Fisk Jubilee Singers, and that the Citizens’

Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the

Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.

Whereas, 6 months after the end of the Civil War, the Fisk

School was established in Nashville, Tennessee;

Whereas the Fisk School was designed by its founders to be

an educational institution open to all, regardless of race

or age;

Whereas the Fisk School was incorporated as Fisk University

in 1867;
2

•HRES 493 IH

Whereas funding for the opening of the school was secured

through the sale of slave paraphernalia;

Whereas, in 1871, a group of students at Fisk University

formed a choral group with the goal of raising money to

finance the institution;

Whereas, in that same year, that choral group, the Fisk Jubilee Singers, took the entire contents of the University

treasury with them for travel expenses and set off on a

tour of the United States and Europe;

Whereas, during their first tour, the Jubilee Singers raised

enough money to preserve their university and pay for

the construction of Jubilee Hall, the South’s first permanent structure built for the education of black students;

Whereas the Jubilee Singers introduced the world to the spiritual as a musical genre; and

Whereas the Fisk Jubilee Singers continue to tour and perform to this day, and have received countless awards and

honors along the way: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring

5 the Fisk Jubilee Singers; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a postage stamp be issued.

Æ
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Barry W. Tackett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. for the
three months ended March 31, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005

/s/Barry W. Tackett
Barry W. Tackett, CFO (Principal Financial Officer)
#### SNOW v. EAST

No. 526P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 59

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00365-CV

Ex parte L.C. §

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (D371-E-12323-16)

September 28, 2017

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s order is 

reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court to grant Appellant L.C.’s 

petition and to enter an order directing expunction. 

It is further ordered that appellee The State of Texas shall bear the costs of 

this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL E. MCCONNELL PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael E. McConnell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 10, 2004



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL E.
MCCONNELL                                                         
|Michael E. McConnell Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
§ 39.710 How does a school calculate annual bus transportation miles for day students? To calculate the total annual bus transportation miles for day students, a school must use the appropriate formula from this section. In the formulas, Tu = Miles driven on Tuesday of the transportation mileage count week, W = Miles driven on Wednesday of the transportation mileage count week, and Th = Miles driven on Thursday of the transportation mileage count week. ( a ) For ISEP-eligible day students whose route is entirely over improved roads, calculate miles using the following formula:
( b ) For ISEP-eligible day students whose route is partly over unimproved roads, calculate miles using the following three steps. ( 1 ) *Step 1.* Apply the following formula to miles driven over improved roads only:
( 2 ) *Step 2.* Apply the following formula to miles driven over unimproved roads only:
( 3 ) *Step 3.* Add together the sums from steps 1 and 2 to obtain the total annual transportation miles.
[Exhibit 99.3]

                           CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert L. Jones, Jr., Chairman/CEO, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on
the Company.



By: /s/ Robert L. Jones,
Chairman/CEO
-------------------------------


April 25, 2003
§ 700.273 Request for notification of existence of records: Action on. ( a ) *Decisions on request.* ( 1 ) An individual inquiring to determine whether a system of records contains records pertaining to him shall be advised within ten (10) days (excepting Saturdays, Sundays and legal public holidays) whether or not the system does contain records pertaining to him unless ( i ) the records were compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding or
( ii ) the system of records is one which has been excepted from the notification provisions of the Privacy Act by rulemaking.
( 2 ) If the records were compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding or the system of records is one which has been excepted from the notification provisions of the Privacy Act by rulemaking, the individual will be promptly notified that his is not entitled to notification of whether the system contains records pertaining to him.
( b ) *Authority to deny requests.* A decision to deny a request for notification of the existence of records shall be made by the Privacy Act Officer.
( c ) *Form of decision.* ( 1 ) No particular form is required for a decision informing an individual whether or not a system of records contains records pertaining to him.
( 2 ) A decision declining to inform an individual whether or not a system of records contains records pertaining to him shall be in writing and shall state the basis for denial of the request and shall advise the individual that he may appeal the declination to the Executive Director pursuant to § 700.285 by writing to the Privacy Act Officer, Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Commission, P.O. Box KK, Flagstaff, Arizona 86002, and that the appeal must be received by this official within twenty (20) days (Saturdays, Sundays and public legal holidays excepted) of the date of the decision.
### SUBCHAPTER V—SMALL BUSINESS DEBTOR REORGANIZATION
#### § 166.422 What does the BIA do with grazing rental payments received from permittees?

Unless arrangements for direct payment to the Indian landowners has been provided, the rent will be deposited to the appropriate account maintained by the Office of Trust Funds Management in accordance with part 115 of this title.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Legal Resources 
-  1998 - 2019 Enrolled Actuaries Meetings - Blue Books 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# 1998 - 2019 Enrolled Actuaries  Meetings - Blue Books

In preparation for annual Enrolled Actuaries Meetings, staff of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation meets with representatives of the Enrolled Actuaries Program Committee to discuss a number of questions.

Summaries of the questions and answers discussed at the meetings were published under the auspices of the Enrolled Actuaries Meeting, by the Conference of Consulting Actuaries (CCA) and are available here as a public service. In addition, the CCA posts an multi-year index that categories each question by topic to make it easier for practitioners to research whether and when a particular issue has been addressed.

The summaries reflect the views of individual staff members involved in each year’s meeting. They do not represent the official position of PBGC.
                            - 2019 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2018 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2017 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2016 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2015 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2014 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2013 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2012 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2011 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2010 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2009 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2008 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2007 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2006 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2005 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2004 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2003 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2002 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2001 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 2000 Question & Answer Summary
                            - 1998 Question & Answer Summary

October 15, 2021
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson Respiratory Care Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Patrick G. Yount, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, that:

|   | 3.     | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | 4.     | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

|   | /s/ PATRICK G. YOUNT                                                    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                         |
|   | **Patrick G. Yount Chief Financial Officer and Secretary May 13, 2003** |
### §952. Parole

(a) The Secretary concerned may provide a system of parole for offenders who are confined in military correctional facilities and who were at the time of commission of their offenses subject to the authority of that Secretary.

(b) In a case in which parole for an offender serving a sentence of confinement for life is denied, only the President or the Secretary concerned may grant the offender parole on appeal of that denial. The authority to grant parole on appeal in such a case may not be delegated.

(Added Pub. L. 90–377, §1, July 5, 1968, 82 Stat. 287; amended Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §582(a), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1760.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–85 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1997 Amendment

Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §582(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1760, provided that: "Subsection (b) of section 952 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), shall apply only with respect to any decision to deny parole made after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 18, 1997]."
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 410 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 1, 2000.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Goode of 
Virginia.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### §753. Stockbroker liquidation and forward contract merchants, commodity brokers, stockbrokers, financial institutions, financial participants, securities clearing agencies, swap participants, repo participants, and master netting agreement participants

Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the exercise of rights by a forward contract merchant, commodity broker, stockbroker, financial institution, financial participant, securities clearing agency, swap participant, repo participant, or master netting agreement participant under this title shall not affect the priority of any unsecured claim it may have after the exercise of such rights.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title IX, §907(m), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 181.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.