alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LIL MARC, INC.
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
              30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
              REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,762
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,950
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,816
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,086
<SALES>                                             60
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    60
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,710)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 570 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     September 7, 2000.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4115) to authorize appropriations for the United States Holocaust 
Memorial Museum, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered 
for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Resources now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order against the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. During 
consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 
Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 
offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee 
of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the 
Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) 
reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed 
question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business, 
provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series 
of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill 
for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 
such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 
in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill 
or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the “**Company**”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”),each of the undersigned officers does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| Dated:  May 10, 2006 |   | /s/  DAVID J. MOORE                        |
|-------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                                |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|                                |   |                                                 |
|                                |   |                                                 |
| Dated:  May 10, 2006 |   | /s/  JONATHAN K. HSU                       |
|                                |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         |

* *

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
March 23, 2015

Mr. Alex Brito

Accent Compliance LLC

248 Old Haymaker Road

Monroeville, PA 15146

Dear Mr. Brito:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your January 13, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Accent Compliance LLC

into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0064), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
### [§2313b. Renumbered §3842]
### §9493. Activities performed as federally chartered nonprofit corporation

(a) Use of Federally Provided Resources.—In its status as a federally chartered nonprofit corporation, the Civil Air Patrol may use equipment, supplies, and other resources, including aircraft, motor vehicles, computers, and communications equipment, provided to the Civil Air Patrol by a department or agency of the Federal Government or acquired by or for the Civil Air Patrol with appropriated funds (or with funds of the Civil Air Patrol, but reimbursed from appropriated funds)—

(1) to provide assistance requested by State or local governmental authorities to perform disaster relief missions and activities, other emergency missions and activities, and nonemergency missions and activities; and

(2) to fulfill its other purposes set forth in section 40302 of title 36.

(b) Use Subject to Applicable Laws.—The use of equipment, supplies, or other resources under subsection (a) is subject to the laws and regulations that govern the use by nonprofit corporations of federally provided assets or of assets purchased with appropriated funds, as the case may be.

(c) Authority Not Contingent on Reimbursement.—The authority for the Civil Air Patrol to provide assistance under subsection (a)(1) is not contingent on the Civil Air Patrol being reimbursed for the cost of providing the assistance. If the Civil Air Patrol elects to require reimbursement for the provision of assistance under such subsection, the Civil Air Patrol may establish the reimbursement rate at a rate less than the rates charged by private sector sources for equivalent services.

(d) Liability Insurance.—The Secretary of the Air Force may provide the Civil Air Patrol with funds for paying the cost of liability insurance to cover missions and activities carried out under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1090(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–295, §9443; renumbered §9493, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 9443 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Oct. 30, 2000, see section 1 [[div. A], title X, §1090(c)] of Pub. L. 106–398, set out as a note under section 9491 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 680 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 680

   Expressing the sense of the House with respect to the request of 
                Leonard Peltier for executive clemency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2000

 Mr. Graham submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the House with respect to the request of 
                Leonard Peltier for executive clemency.

Whereas Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agents Ron A. Williams and Jack 
        R. Coler were grievously wounded and then executed at point blank range 
        during the commission of their duties;
Whereas Leonard Peltier was convicted on one count of the first degree murder of 
        Agent Ron A. Williams and one count of first degree murder of Agent Jack 
        R. Coler;
Whereas Leonard Peltier is currently serving two consecutive life sentences for 
        his crimes;
Whereas the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation has recently stated 
        that the brutal crimes committed by Leonard Peltier are considered a 
        complete affront to our cherished system of Government under the rule of 
        law;
Whereas the eighth circuit court of appeals has consistently upheld his 
        conviction on four separate occasions;
Whereas the Supreme Court has twice declined to review his appeal;
Whereas the Federal Parole Board refused to recommend his parole as recently as 
        June 12, 2000; and
Whereas the families of the slain agents have decidedly opposed the commutation 
        of Leonard Peltier's sentence: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that--
            (1) Leonard Peltier's petition for executive clemency from 
        consecutive life sentences for his brutal crimes should be 
        denied; and
            (2) Leonard Peltier's premeditated execution of two young 
        Federal Bureau of Investigation agents was the most vile 
        disrespect to all that we cherish under our law and our God and 
        for which moderation can only signal disrespect.
                                 <all>
```
§ 522.13 Revocation of class III gaming. A governing body of a tribe, in its sole discretion and without the approval of the Chair, may adopt an ordinance or resolution revoking any prior ordinance or resolution that authorizes class III gaming. ( a ) A tribe shall submit to the Chair one copy of any revocation ordinance or resolution certified as authentic by an authorized tribal official.
( b ) The Chairman shall publish such ordinance or resolution in the Federal Register and the revocation provided by such ordinance or resolution shall take effect on the date of such publication.
( c ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any person or entity operating a class III gaming operation on the date of publication in the Federal Register under paragraph (b) of this section may, during a one-year period beginning on the date of publication, continue to operate such operation in conformance with a tribal-state compact.
( d ) A revocation shall not affect: ( 1 ) Any civil action that arises during the one-year period following publication of the revocation; or
( 2 ) Any crime that is committed during the one-year period following publication of the revocation.
### subpart 2—housing goals
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 623

Regarding the adoption of Resolution 1322 by the Security Council of the

United Nations on October 7, 2000.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. OSE, Mr. WEINER, Mr. SAXTON,

Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. SALMON, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN,

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mrs. ROUKEMA, and Mr. LOBIONDO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

International Relations

RESOLUTION

Regarding the adoption of Resolution 1322 by the Security

Council of the United Nations on October 7, 2000.

Whereas the Security Council of the United Nations voted in

emergency session to adopt Resolution 1322 on October

7, 2000;

Whereas such resolution uniquely condemns Israel for acts of

violence, and cites the excessive use of force by Israelis

against Palestinians starting on September 28, 2000;

Whereas such resolution fails to recognize the violence

against Israel and the citizens of Israel that is organized

and instigated by Palestinian officials and police;
2

•HRES 623 IH

Whereas such resolution implicitly criticizes the visit by

Israeli Likud official Ariel Sharon to Jerusalem’s holy

sites, which are open to members of all faiths; and

Whereas Israel has made persistent and unprecedented attempts to secure a peace agreement with the Palestinians: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) denounces the abstention by the United

3 States from voting on Resolution 1322, which was

4 adopted by the Security Council of the United Na5 tions on October 7, 2000;

6 (2) calls upon the President to declare such res7 olution null and void as a matter of national policy;

8 (3) urges the member states of the United Na9 tions to vigorously oppose any and all efforts to ma10 nipulate the Fourth Geneva Convention for the sole

11 purpose of attacking Israel;

12 (4) condemns the Security Council of the

13 United Nations for its one-sided condemnation of

14 Israel, which failed to take into account the causes

15 of the violence and the right of Israel as a sovereign

16 state to defend its citizens and soldiers from life

17 threatening attacks; and

18 (5) urges leaders of the Israeli and Palestinian

19 peoples to seek a secure future for all citizens of the
3

•HRES 623 IH

1 Middle East through a full and thorough peace proc2 ess.

Æ
ULDHcliliiNI

I !If T,....notlon ()'rU **Cl-~~f**

Dl t::'-tcr .2'1:1'1 DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE, PROCESS, ORDERS DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS Chief, Documentary Services Div
. Department ofTransponation Washington

.D .C .20590
A TTENTJON: DOCKET SECTION, C-SS **...:A..:;I~as:=t:k.:.:a:...:A..:..i:..:..rl:.:.:in:.:.:e..=s"""'.**l:..:..:no:c.,__ ___________________

_.... having its principal office at I 9300 International Blvd

.Seattle 98188 hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly section 1005(b) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended} the person named below as its Agent upon whom service of all notices and process

,and all orders

, decisions, and requirements of the Department of Transportation may be made for and on behalf of said carrier, hereby canceling all previous designations of agents made by it lothe DOT

. NameofAgent ________**-=D~a~vi~d..:..H~e~ffi~e~m:.:.:a~n,__**________________

__ Address Cozen O'Connor,

I 627 I Street, NW, Suite II 00, Washington, DC 20006 (202) 463-2537 (djrect>; dheffernan@cozen

.com (e-mail) The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: Nam e j) -._-..; Jt **H.e.{:fc.f'~<lA** (Initials) _ :h _ H ____
_ JN WITNESS WHEREOF

, , _**__..A~I.::.:as...,k,.,a..._A**
..... ir:.:.l:.:.:in:.:e..,s._.l""'nc"""

, ----------

has caused these presents to be s i gned in its name by Ben Minicucci

,Chief Operating Officer & Executive Vice President of said company, and to be attested under its corporate seal by Shannon Alberts. Comomte Secretarv on this **~** day of Janu!lQ'. 1Q.U Alaska Airlines

.Inc
. **By(21r)~,/\,~'o:::.....r= _'---_** **~ .=........:=** **~- ~c'**  ATTEST

: **_/ ~**  / Shannon Alberts OS T F 10 10. 5 (1 - 95)
### §7231. Command: chaplains

A chaplain has rank without command.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 206, §3581; renumbered §7231, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3581 | 10:235. | R.S. 1122. |

The words "and shall be on the same footing with other officers of the Army, as to tenure of office, retirement, and pensions" are omitted as obsolete, since there is no distinction between the status of a chaplain as an officer and the status of other officers of the Army.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7231 was renumbered section 8631 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3581 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER XIII—CIRCULATING NOTES AND BONDS SECURING SAME
# C_2006294EN.01005202.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/52

---

Action brought on 20 September 2006 — Torres v OHIM — Navisa Industrial Vinícola Española (MANSO DE VELASCO)

(Case T-259/06)

(2006/C 294/108)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Miguel Torres SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Navisa Industrial Vinícola Española SA

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 June 2006 in Case R-865/2005-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 June 2006 in Case R-865/2005-1;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Miguel Torres SA

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark MANSO DE VELASCO for goods in Class 33 — application No 2261527

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Navisa Industrial Vinícola Española SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish word mark VELASCO for goods in Class 33

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld and refusal of the application

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) given that there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting signs making them incompatible.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 11 of 14.1.1994, p. 1).

1

---