alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1701h–1. Housing for elderly persons advisory committee

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall establish, in accordance with the provisions of section 1701h of this title, an advisory committee on matters relating to housing for elderly persons.

(Aug. 7, 1956, ch. 1029, title I, §104(d), 70 Stat. 1093; Pub. L. 90–19, §13(a), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 24.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Housing Act of 1956, and not as part of the National Housing Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1967—Pub. L. 90–19 substituted "Secretary of Housing and Urban Development" for "Housing and Home Finance Administrator".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Advisory Committees

Advisory committees in existence on Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period following Jan. 5, 1973, unless, in the case of a committee established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such committee is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a committee established by the Congress, its duration is otherwise provided for by law. See section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
# C_2006293EN.01000101.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

1 December 2006

(2006/C 293/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3244 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 153,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4543 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67290 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0360 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5884 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,92 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1625 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5780 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,950 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 256,12 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6978 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8056 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4275 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,63 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 35,538 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9253 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6778 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5139 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2983 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9380 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0473 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 229,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4606 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3780 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3488 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 144,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7592 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,604 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7790 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,577 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3244

JPY

Japanese yen

153,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4543

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67290

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0360

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5884

ISK

Iceland króna

89,92

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1625

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5780

CZK

Czech koruna

27,950

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

256,12

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6978

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8056

RON

Romanian leu

3,4275

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,63

SKK

Slovak koruna

35,538

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9253

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6778

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5139

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2983

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9380

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0473

KRW

South Korean won

1 229,84

ZAR

South African rand

9,4606

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3780

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3488

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 144,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7592

PHP

Philippine peso

65,604

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7790

THB

Thai baht

47,577

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
10.12 

11/8/04 

 Page 1 

Quitting Tobacco: Having a Drink ... Without Smoking 

What To Expect 

• As a smoker, you may feel a strong urge to smoke when drinking beer, wine, or mixed 

drinks. Know this up front if you are going to drink. 

Did You Know? 

• Studies show that cigarette smoking is much more common among those who are regular 

drinkers. 

What To Do 

• Switch to non-alcoholic drinks, especially fruit juices, during the first two weeks of 

withdrawal. 

• Stay away from the places you usually drink alcohol for a while. 

• If you do drink, don’t choose the alcoholic beverages you usually have when smoking. 

• For the first few weeks after quitting, drink only with non-smoking friends. 

• Don’t drink at home or by yourself. 

Nicotine and Your Body and Mind 

• Studies have shown that if you are a drinker, you will tend to breathe deeper when you 

drink and smoke—making the negative effects of tobacco even worse. 

• When you are drinking alcohol, your control over your behavior is limited. When you try 

to quit smoking, it is tough enough to take control of your behavior—drinking alcohol 

will make it even tougher to cope. 

• Many studies have reported that smoking, like drinking, may actually make you feel 

happier and more alert. Over time you begin to associate smoking and drinking with 

pleasure—when quitting, you may feel deprived of some of this pleasure. 

Related Notes 

• Once you pinpoint high-risk situations that trigger the urge to smoke, you can start to 

handle them rationally. When do you smoke and drink? Where? Nicotine cravings may 

be reduced by using nicotine replacement products, which deliver small, steady doses of 

nicotine into the body. Nicotine replacement patches, gum, lozenges, nasal spray, and 

inhaler appear to be equally effective. Buproprion pills (which don’t contain nicotine) 

also help relieve withdrawal symptoms. 
10.12 

11/8/04 

 Page 2 

How To Get Help 

• If you or someone you know wants help with giving up tobacco, please call the National 

Cancer Institute’s Smoking Quitline toll-free at 1–877–44U–QUIT (1–877–448–7848). 

The information specialists on the Quitline can provide suggestions and support to help 

smokers break the habit. 

• The Federal Government’s Smokefree.gov Web site (http://www.smokefree.gov) allows 

you to choose the help that best fits your needs. You can get immediate assistance: 

o View an online step-by-step cessation guide. 

o Find state quitline telephone numbers. 

o Instant message an expert through NCI’s LiveHelp service. 

o Download, print, or order publications about quitting smoking. 

# # # 

This fact sheet was reviewed on 11/8/04 

This fact sheet was adapted from material developed by the Tobacco Education and Prevention Program 

of the Arizona Department of Health Services and the Arizona Smokers’ Helpline of the University of 

Arizona.
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby
certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the
"Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer" and "Sponsor")
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of April 25, 2012 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American
Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2012-2 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2013, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
this 31stday of May, 2013.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
152 So.2d 150

#### Earl PHILLIPS, alias v. STATE.

6 Div. 975.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 11, 1963.

Earl Phillips, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John C. Tyson, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

SIMPSON, Justice.

Petition of Earl Phillips for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Phillips v. State, 152 So.2d 148, 150.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON,' C. J., and MERRILL and PIARWOOD, JJ., concur.
§ 247.2 What lands are subject to these regulations? ( a ) Any treaty fishing access sites and ancillary fishing facilities.
( b ) These sites and facilities are managed for the exclusive use of members of the Nez Perce Tribe, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation, the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Reservation.
( c ) The Area Director may suspend or withdraw the privileges of use of any or all of the facilities at the sites for any violation of the regulations in this part or of any rules issued under the regulations in this part.
EXHIBIT 32.3

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
          1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Plus Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Patricia E. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer (Principal
Financial Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and result of
operations on the Company.


/s/Patricia E. Jones
-----------------------------
Patricia E. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer
----

----

|   |   | Principal Officers: Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.   President & CEO Jodi L. Anhorn, M.Sc., P. Eng.    Executive Vice President & COO Officers / Vice Presidents: Terry L. Aarsby, P. Eng.Caralyn P. Bennett, P. Eng. Leonard L. Herchen, P. Eng. Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng. Todd J. Ikeda, P. Eng.Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.Mark Jobin, P. Geol.John E. Keith, P. Eng.John H. Stilling, P. Eng. Douglas R. Sutton, P. Eng. James H. Willmon, P. Eng. |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  | Yours truly,                   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|
|                  |                           |
|                  | GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD. |
|                  |                                |
|                  | Terry L. Aarsby, P. Eng.       |
|                  | Vice President                 |
| Dated: March 11, 2014 |                           |
| Calgary, Alberta      |                           |
| CANADA                |                           |

----

----
Exhibit 10.1


   Summary of Compensation for Non-Management Directors of KeySpan Corporation
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


The  non-employee  directors will receive the following  compensation  effective
August 1, 2005:

               -    $43,500 annual retainer;

               -    $2,000 committee meeting fee;

               -    $5,000 committee  chairman retainer for the Compensation and
                    Management  Development  Committee and Corporate  Governance
                    and Nominating Committee;

               -    $10,000 committee chairman retainer for the Audit Committee;

               -    $64,000 in common stock equivalents  granted pursuant to the
                    Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan.

Employee  directors  continue to receive no  additional  compensation  for their
service on the Board of Directors or its committees.
# C_2006326EN.01005301.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/53

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-425/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 326/109)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 25.02.2006.

1

---
# C_2006294EN.01004701.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/47

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2006 — Dimitra Lantzoni v Court of Justice

(Case T-156/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Promotion - Award of promotion points - Link to staff report - Refusal of promotion)

(2006/C 294/98)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Dimitra Lantzoni (residing at Übersyren, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Bouché, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice (represented by: M. Schauss, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 8 March 2005 of the defendant's Complaints Committee relating, first, to the promotion points awarded to the applicant for 2002 and, second, to the fact that she was not promoted in 2003.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155 of 25.6.2005

1

---
#### The Werner Co. v. John McLaughlin.

1. Appellate Court *Practice*— Proceedings *in Reversed*Oases.— Where a cause is reversed because the evidence fails to sustain the verdict and is remanded for a new trial, and at the second trial, evidence in addition to that had on the first trial is presented, but when on a second review of the case in the Appellate Court, a careful examination of the additional evidence fails to show that the plaintiff has strengthened his case, the cause will be again reversed and remanded.

Assumpsit, on an account. Error to the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. Russell P. Goodwin, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1900.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed November 1, 1901.

Newman, Northrup *&*Levinson, attorneys for plaintiff in error.

Wm. E. Hughes and John J. Coburn, attorneys for defendant in error.

Hr. Presiding Justice Freeman

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause has been here before, and at that time the judgment in favor of defendant in error was reversed, this court holding that “ the finding of the trial court can not *54be sustained by the testimony as the same is preserved in this record.”

In addition to the evidence in the former trial the defendant in error introduced four letters which were not offered before. It seems to be conceded that these letters constitute all the new evidence introduced at the second trial. The only question we have to consider is whether this additional evidence strengthens the plaintiff’s case, so that taken in connection with the other evidence given at the former trial, the whole evidence now sustains the judgment. The attorneys for defendant in error have failed to point out in what respect anything contained in these four letters throws any new light upon the controversy. A careful examination fails to show that the plaintiff has strengthened his case and for the reasons given at the former hearing in this court, the judgment of the County Court must be reversed and there will be a finding of facts.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 552

Urging the House to support mentoring programs such as Saturday Academy

at the Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 2000

Mr. WU (for himself, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr.

DEFAZIO, Mr. BLUMENAUER, and Mr. BAIRD) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the

Workforce

RESOLUTION

Urging the House to support mentoring programs such as

Saturday Academy at the Oregon Graduate Institute of

Science and Technology.

Whereas exceptional opportunities should be provided for students in grades 4 through 12 to learn from accomplished

professionals through hands-on, practical, and intellectual

learning experiences;

Whereas workshops, internships, and laboratories are offered

during and after-school hours, weekends, and summers;

Whereas Saturday Academy links universities, private companies and their resources, staff, laboratories, classrooms,

and equipment with students to provide the opportunity

to use real tools to solve real life problems;
2

•HRES 552 IH

Whereas opportunities provided by programs such as Saturday Academy bridge the gap between the classroom and

the real world;

Whereas students from low-income families and groups

underrepresented in science and engineering are actively

recruited and supported by Saturday Academy;

Whereas nearly 99,000 students since 1983 have received

Saturday Academy instruction in rural, urban, and suburban areas;

Whereas Saturday Academy received the Presidential Award

for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and Engineering

Mentoring by the President in 1996;

Whereas the 1995 Third International Mathematics and

Science Study found that in the final year of secondary

school, the performance of the United States was among

the lowest in both science and mathematics;

Whereas, the United States is facing a shortage of qualified

professionals in science, technology, and engineering; and

Whereas Saturday Academy places special emphasis on

science, mathematics, and technology: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports

2 and encourages programs such as Saturday Academy to

3 help students enter mathematics, science, and engineering

4 fields.

Æ