alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 25, 2015

No. 04-15-00554-CV

Kathleen BARRACO,

Appellant

v.

LEVY TOWNHOUSE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-19385

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 14, 2015, this court dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution. On 

October 29, 2015, Appellant filed a motion for rehearing to reinstate the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 49.1.

The panel has considered Appellant’s motion for rehearing and Appellee’s response; the 

motion is GRANTED. See id. R. 49.3. We withdraw our opinion and judgment of October 14, 

2015, and reinstate this appeal on the court’s docket. 

Appellant’s brief is due within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. See id. R. 

38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED on November 25, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.6


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Crescent Point Energy Corp. (the “ Company ”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2018 and amended on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Saxberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:    March 14, 2018CRESCENT POINT ENERGY CORP./s/ Scott SaxbergName:Title:Scott SaxbergPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 16, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 16, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0022. IN THE INTEREST OF M. P. B. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER).

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

1800229 1800228
### §8263. Emergency shore duty: advance of funds

Under such regulations as the President approves, the Secretary of the Navy may, to meet necessary expenses, advance funds to members of the naval service detailed on emergency shore duty. The funds advanced may not exceed the reasonable estimate of expenses to be incurred for which reimbursement is authorized.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 386, §6152; renumbered §8263, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(10), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1835.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6152 | 34 U.S.C. 885. | May 22, 1928, ch. 688, 45 Stat. 712. |

The words "public", "actual", and "by law" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8263, added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(166)(B), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1516; Pub. L. 87–649, §14c(53), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 501, provided for voluntary extension of enlistments in the Air Force, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 90–235, §2(a)(4)(B), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 756.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6152 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation to the Secretary of Defense of authority vested in the President by section 885 of former Title 34, see Ex. Ord. No. 10621, July 1, 1955, 20 F.R. 4759, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barrington Reynolds, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 177]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered on or about May 27, 2005, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Friedman, J.E, Sullivan, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 2:04 PM To: Vijay Tendulkar; Brian Coffey; Thomas Patzner; Rob Greeson; Bob Smith; Michael Rivest; Eduardo Robles Subject: LV Transformer Reg-Neg: Revised Table of Efficiencies

Colleagues,

Attached for your review is a helpful table suppl ied by Tom Patzner at Scheider Electric setting forth the essential terms of a possible counter-offer on low-voltage transformers -- the one SE has been talking about.

All best, Richard
Attachment 13

AIM Results Sanitized
Document

Exhibit 10.4

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


    THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of November 15, 2021, is made by and between TransDigm Group Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Michael Lisman (“Executive”).  


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) setting forth certain terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company; and


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the respective covenants and agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows: 


1.Amendments. Section 6(b)(iii) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and restated in its entirety as follows:


(iii) 18.0 times the difference of (A) the Monthly COBRA Continuation Coverage Rate determined as of the Date of Termination for the Executive’s applicable health plan coverage as in effect on such date, less (B) the monthly cost to Executive that is being charged for such coverage as of the Date of Termination.  
2.    Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
3.    Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed, construed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of Ohio. 
4.    Full Force and Effect.  Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and unmodified hereby.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date and year first above written. 


									
			
	TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED
		
	By:		/s/ Kevin Stein
	Name:		Kevin Stein
	Title:		Chief Executive Officer
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	/s/ Michael Lisman
	Michael Lisman
### §562. Timing of damage measurement in connection with swap agreements, securities contracts, forward contracts, commodity contracts, repurchase agreements, and master netting agreements

(a) If the trustee rejects a swap agreement, securities contract (as defined in section 741), forward contract, commodity contract (as defined in section 761), repurchase agreement, or master netting agreement pursuant to section 365(a), or if a forward contract merchant, stockbroker, financial institution, securities clearing agency, repo participant, financial participant, master netting agreement participant, or swap participant liquidates, terminates, or accelerates such contract or agreement, damages shall be measured as of the earlier of—

(1) the date of such rejection; or

(2) the date or dates of such liquidation, termination, or acceleration.

(b) If there are not any commercially reasonable determinants of value as of any date referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a), damages shall be measured as of the earliest subsequent date or dates on which there are commercially reasonable determinants of value.

(c) For the purposes of subsection (b), if damages are not measured as of the date or dates of rejection, liquidation, termination, or acceleration, and the forward contract merchant, stockbroker, financial institution, securities clearing agency, repo participant, financial participant, master netting agreement participant, or swap participant or the trustee objects to the timing of the measurement of damages—

(1) the trustee, in the case of an objection by a forward contract merchant, stockbroker, financial institution, securities clearing agency, repo participant, financial participant, master netting agreement participant, or swap participant; or

(2) the forward contract merchant, stockbroker, financial institution, securities clearing agency, repo participant, financial participant, master netting agreement participant, or swap participant, in the case of an objection by the trustee,

has the burden of proving that there were no commercially reasonable determinants of value as of such date or dates.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title IX, §910(a)(1), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 184.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00230

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021

- 003411

- 1

Before Sudderth , C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### G RACE 

### B ROWN 

### , Appellant

V



### . 3145 B LUE 

### C RESCENT 

### FW, LLC , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant ’ s brief was due on December 17, 2021

. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6. On
December 28, 2021, we notified Appellant that her brief had not been filed and tha t
her failure to file a b rief violated Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6

. We warned

that we c o uld dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days,

A ppellant filed a brief with the court along with a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimeliness and why an extension was necessary
. See Tex. R. App. P. 1 0.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). More than ten days have passed, but we have not
received a response

. Because A ppellant has failed to file a brief as the Rules of Ap pellate Procedure require , we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1),

4 2.3(b ), ( c) , 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : Janu ary 27, 2022
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  IRS Con El Formulario de Impuesto Sobre El Ingreso 1099-R 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov’s English home page for more information available in English.

# IRS con el Formulario de Impuesto sobre el Ingreso 1099-R

Su formulario 1099-R del IRS, para los beneficios pagados por PBGC, le será enviado por correo a través del Servicio Postal de los EE.UU. el 1 de febrero de 2021. Por favor, permita hasta el 15 de febrero para la entrega.

El formulario 1099-R es un formulario de impuestos del Servicio de Impuestos Internos (IRS, siglas in inglés) para informar sobre las distribuciones de las pensiones.

Su beneficio de PBGC puede estar sujeto a impuestos dependiendo de sus circunstancias individuales. Le proporcionaremos un formulario 1099-R con instrucciones para ayudarle con sus impuestos. 

El formulario 1099-R también sirve como prueba del estatus de beneficiario de PBGC para el Crédito Fiscal por Cobertura Médica (HCTC) (página en inglés). El HCTC es un crédito fiscal del IRS para el 72.5 por ciento de las primas de seguro de atención médica, que puede aplicarse a ciertos individuos que tienen entre 55 y 65 años de edad y que reciben beneficios de PBGC. **Nota**: El HCTC ha sido extendido y ahora expira el 31 de diciembre de 2021.

A partir del 2 de febrero de 2021, usted puede utilizar su acceso existente a MyPBA (página en inglés) para obtener su Formulario 1099-R de 2020 a través de MyPBA (página en inglés).

Durante el primer año en que PBGC pague los beneficios de pensión de su plan, puede recibir dos formularios 1099-R, uno por los pagos emitidos por el administrador anterior del plan y otro por los pagos emitidos por PBGC.

Si no ha recibido su formulario 1099-R por los pagos emitidos por su administrador anterior del plan, tendrá que ponerse en contacto directamente con ellos.

Encuentre más información disponible sobre su formulario 1099-R en la página web de PBGC en la sección Formulario 1099-R del IRS Preguntas Frecuentes (página en inglés):

**Recursos del formulario 1099-R del IRS**
                          - Instrucciones  (página en inglés)
                          - Formulario de muestra 1099-R  (página en inglés)

**Impuestos Estatales sobre los Ingresos**

Aunque PBGC está obligada a retener el impuesto federal sobre el ingreso en ciertas situaciones, no retenemos los impuestos estatales. Si su estado tiene un impuesto sobre el ingreso, su beneficio de PBGC puede estar sujeto a impuestos. Comuníquese con la oficina de impuestos de su estado (página en inglés) para obtener más información.

 

Septiembre 8, 2021

Déjenos sus comentarios
#### § 216.5 Basis for denial of a permit or lease.

An application for a permit or lease to conduct exploratory or mining operations may be denied any applicant who has forfeited a required bond because of failure to comply with a mining plan. However, a permit or lease may not be denied an applicant because of the forfeiture of a bond if the lands disturbed under his previous permit or lease have subsequently been reclaimed without cost to the lessor or the United States.
# C_2006277EN.01002502.xml

| 15.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/25

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4368 — Edison/Eneco Energia)

(2006/C 277/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 19 October 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4368. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4368. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the Company) for
the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Liu, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | the
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |                                       
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------
|                        | /s/ David
  Liu                       
|                        |                                       
|                        | David Liu                             
|                        | Chairman and
  Chief Executive Officer
|                        |                                       
|Date: November 14, 2006 |                                       

---
#### JENKINS v. CITY OF KINGS MOUNTAIN

No. 511P89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 661

Motion by defendants to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 18 January 1990. Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990.
### Distribution, regional variation, and geochemical coherence of selected elements in the sediments of the central Gulf of Mexico

By: Charles Ward Holmes

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp928

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee.
    Date: March 18, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Jeffrey H. Hurst, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7208, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301/435-0303.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4300 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### § 700.609 Appeals.

Appeals of eligibility, hearings and administrative review (appeals) will be administered under subpart L of this part.
#### § 286.10 Preservation of historical and archeological data.

The Assistant Secretary before approving a grant where the grant funds and/or the loan funds will be used to finance activities involving excavations, road construction, and land development or involving the disturbance of land on known or reported historical or archeological sites, will take appropriate action to assure compliance with applicable provisions of the Act of June 27, 1960 (74 Stat. 220 (16 U.S.C. 469)), as amended by the Act of May 24, 1974 (Pub. L. 93-291, 88 Stat. 174), relating to the preservation of historical and archeological data.