alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1504. Commencement of ancillary case

A case under this chapter is commenced by the filing of a petition for recognition of a foreign proceeding under section 1515.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 136.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

** The dismissal of Gordon’s claims against the other named

defendants was affirmed by this court on February 11, 2000. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-31176

Summary Calendar

 

WAYNE GORDON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; ET AL

Defendants,

CURTIS W. THORNE, Deputy #809 Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office,

STEPHEN P. RANDON, Deputy #103261 Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s

Office,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-3191-T

- - - - - - - - - -

August 7, 2001

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wayne Gordon, Louisiana prisoner #95912, appeals the

district court’s dismissal, after remand by this court, of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 false-arrest-and-imprisonment claims against

Deputies Curtis Thorne and Stephen Randon, the Sheriff’s Office

employees who allegedly arrested him.** The district court did
No. 00-31176

-2-

not abuse its discretion in ruling that Gordon’s unlawful-arrestand-imprisonment claims against Thorne and Randon were barred by

the doctrine of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Although

“a claim of unlawful arrest, standing alone, does not necessarily

implicate the validity of a criminal prosecution following the

arrest,” the use at trial of evidence seized during the arrest

subjects the claim to the Heck bar, since invalidation of the

arrest would undermine the validity of the conviction. Mackey v.

Dickson, 47 F.3d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 1995). Gordon does not

contest that the gun seized during his arrest was used as

evidence at his trial for aggravated battery, and the evidence

submitted upon remand bears this out. Accordingly, Gordon’s

unlawful-arrest-and-imprisonment claims against Deputies Thorne

and Randon are barred by Heck. Id. 

AFFIRMED.
,,'1(\ 

PBGC 

Protecting America's Pensions 

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

1200 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005-4026 

www.pbgc.gov 

August 8, 2006 

Re: I Case 195240 

LTV Steel Hourly Pension Plan (the "Plan") 

Dear '---1 ___ _ 

We are responding to your May 10, 2005 appeal of PBGC's 

determination that 1 1 is not entitled to a Plan 

benefit. We are closing your current appeal because PBGC's 

April 1, 2005 determination will be superseded by a new PBGC 

determination. 

PBGC's Determination 

PBGC determined I I earned less than the 10 years 

continuous service the Plan required for a benefit. PBGC found she 

earned only 9.917 years service, the elapsed time from her Junec=J 

1976 hire date until May 1, 1986. 

Your Appeal 

You noted PBGC is providing benefits to two Plan participants 

similarly-situated to I I 

Discussion 

We shared our research with PBGC's Benefits Administration 

and Payments Department. BAPD concluded they will revise their 

April 1, 2005 determination. 

Decision 

We are closing your appeal of PBGC's April 1, 2005 

determination. PBGC will issue I la new determination on 

enti tlement and the dollar amount of any Plan benefit she is 

entitled to receive. PBGC's forthcoming new determination will 

supersede the April 1, 2005 determination you appealed. 
- 2 -

Inew determination will also include a new 4S-day 

right'-----t-o-a-p-p-e-a~l-.---" If I I has any questions about receiving 

her new determination, she may contact PBGC's Authorized 

Representative at 1-800-400-7242. Thank you for your patience 

while we carefully reviewed your appeal. 

Sincerely, 

William D. Ellis 

Appeals Board Member 

cc:
### §8727. Cooperative or unit plans in the naval petroleum reserves

The Secretary, with the consent of the President, may make agreements, with respect to lands inside the naval petroleum reserves, of the same type as the Secretary of the Interior may make under section 17(m) of the Act of February 25, 1920 (30 U.S.C. 226(m)). No such agreement made by the Secretary may extend the term of any lease unless the agreement so provides.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 460, §7427; Pub. L. 94–258, title II, §201(8), Apr. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 309; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §513(33), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2934; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1233(g)(3), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2058; renumbered §8727, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7427 | 30 U.S.C. 236b (last 46 words). | Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 916, §13 (29th through 85th words) 60 Stat. 958. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7427 of this title as this section.

1988—Pub. L. 100–456 substituted "section 17(m)" for "section 17(j)" and "30 U.S.C. 226(m)" for "30 U.S.C. 226(j)".

1980—Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "section 17(j) of the Act of February 25, 1920 (30 U.S.C. 226(j))" for "section 226e of title 30".

1976—Pub. L. 94–258 struck out "of the Navy" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Ex. Ord. No. 12929. Delegation of Authority Regarding Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves

Ex. Ord. No. 12929, Sept. 29, 1994, 59 F.R. 50473, provided:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3 and sections 7427 and 7428 [now 8727 and 8728] of title 10, United States Code, and in order to meet the goals and requirements of the Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves, it is hereby ordered as follows:

The functions vested in the President by sections 7427 and 7428 [now 8727 and 8728] of title 10 of the United States Code are delegated to the Secretary of Energy.

William J. Clinton.

Temporary delegations of functions of President under this section were contained in the following prior Executive Orders:

Ex. Ord. No. 12784, Dec. 19, 1991, 56 F.R. 66339.

Ex. Ord. No. 12659, Dec. 15, 1988, 53 F.R. 50911.
OFFICE OF THE AFTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN _ xonomblr T* Y. Trlelo First Amirtent Stat* Buppsrlntwulent Austin, Tour tar Ws riot

not to amted the LWA Of airXundrad Dollara ($600) for the riaoal year 1940 and LtrEunprad Dol.lar~ t9600)for the Pluealyror 19Jbi.9 

### COMhlnTcc
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Multex.com,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
S. Geisenheimer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



    /s/ JEFFREY S. GEISENHEIMER
---------------------------------

Jeffrey S. Geisenheimer
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
### §9454. Buildings and grounds: buildings for religious worship

The Secretary of the Air Force may authorize any denomination, sect, or religious body to erect a building for religious worship at the Air Force Academy, if its erection will not interfere with the use of the reservation for military purposes and will be without expense to the United States. Such a building shall be removed, or its location changed, without compensation for it and without expense to the United States, by the denomination, sect, or religious body that erected it, whenever in the opinion of the Secretary public or military necessity so requires.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 567, §9354; renumbered §9454, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(a)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9354 | 10:1126. | July 8, 1898, ch. 636, 30 Stat. 722. |

The words "in his discretion" and "Government of" are omitted as surplusage. The words "United States" are substituted for the word "Government".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 9354 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 429]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ429.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 2916]]

Public Law 109-429
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
 study to determine the suitability and feasibility of including in the 
National Park System certain sites in Monroe County, Michigan, relating 
to the Battles of the River Raisin during the War of 1812. <<NOTE: Dec. 
                       20, 2006 -  [H.R. 5132]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: River Raisin 
National Battlefield Study Act.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``River Raisin National Battlefield 
Study Act''.
SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY, MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, SITES 
                    RELATING TO BATTLES OF THE RIVER RAISIN.

    (a) Study Required.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a 
special resource study of sites in Monroe County, Michigan, relating to 
the Battles of the River Raisin on January 18 and 22, 1813, and their 
aftermath to determine--
            (1) the national significance of the sites; and
            (2) the suitability and feasibility of including the sites 
        in the National Park System.

    (b) Requirements.--The study conducted under subsection (a) shall 
include the analysis and recommendations of the Secretary on--
            (1) the effect on Monroe County, Michigan, of including the 
        sites in the National Park System; and
            (2) whether the sites could be included in an existing unit 
        of the National Park System.

    (c) Consultation.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall consult with--
            (1) appropriate Federal agencies and State and local 
        government entities; and
            (2) interested groups and organizations.

    (d) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-1 et 
seq.).
    (e) Report.--Not later than three years after the date on which 
funds are first made available for the study, the Secretary shall submit 
to the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report 
containing--

[[Page 120 STAT. 2917]]

            (1) the findings of the study; and
            (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.

    Approved December 20, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5132:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-637 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Sept. 25, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 293 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 293

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of 
    ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 1999

Mr. Clyburn (for himself, Mr. Bishop, Ms. Brown of Florida, Ms. Carson, 
 Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Clay, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Cummings, 
Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Ford, Mr. Hastings of 
  Florida, Mr. Hilliard, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Ms. Jackson-Lee of 
     Texas, Mr. Jefferson, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Ms. 
 Kilpatrick, Ms. Lee, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Ms. McKinney, Mrs. Meek of 
Florida, Mr. Meeks of New York, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
  Owens, Mr. Payne, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Rush, Mr. Scott, Mr. Thompson of 
  Mississippi, Mr. Towns, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Ms. Waters, Mr. Watt of 
North Carolina, and Mr. Wynn) submitted the following resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of 
    ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

Whereas there are 105 historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality education so 
        essential to full participation in a complex, highly technological 
        society;
Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and have played a 
        prominent role in American history;
Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged 
        students to attain their full potential through higher education;
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition; and
Whereas Senate Resolution 178 would designate the week beginning September 19, 
        1999, as ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,
    That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideas of ``National Historically 
        Black Colleges and Universities Week''; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups to conduct appropriate ceremonies, activities, and 
        programs to demonstrate support for historically black colleges 
        and universities in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-117 

December 14, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 208 Mergers, Consolidations and other Transfers of Plan Assets

4041 Termination by Plan Administrator 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter inquiring as to whether a transfer of plan assets conjunctive with the termination

of participation of some of the plan participants constitutes a termination under Title IV of the Employee Retirement

Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). Next, you asked for the concurrence of the Pension Benefit Guaranty

Corporation (the "PBGC") that there will be no employer liability under Sub-Title D of Title IV of the Act as a result

of this transfer of assets and cessation of contributions. 

We understand that none of the participants are terminating employment nor is the employer ceasing operations as

a result of the transfer of assets. The sole cause of the transfer is the ceasing of plan participation by certain employees

who are joining a new plan. The plan is continuing in operation. This does not constitute a termination under Title IV

of the Act and § 4062(e) of the Act does not apply. Accordingly, no present or future liability under Subtitle D of Title

IV of the Act is incurred by the employer as a result of this cessation of contributions [*2] and transfer of assets. 

We express no opinion on the validity of the asset transfer under the Plan or other provisions of the law.

Furthermore, questions as to whether this is a transfer of plan assets within the meaning of § § 208 or 1021(b) of the Act

should be directed to the appropriate administering agencies, the Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service.

We hope this is of assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Next 60 Days

Key Events

FEbruary 2024 March 2024 tRANSITION

RESIDUAL FUEL tracker 

GALLONS rEMOVED 

CRI: Community Representation Initiative

DLNR: Department of Land and Natural Resources 

DISF: Defueling Information Sharing Forum

NB: NEIGHBORHOOD BOARD

Joint Task Force – Red Hill

RESIDUAL FUEL TRACKER

As of February 19, 2024 

Subject to Revision

Dashboard Legend

March:

7 MAR - FUEL TANK ADVISORY COMMITTEE 

19 MAR - DLNR COMMISSION ON WATER 

 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MEETING

21 MAR - (Tentative) CRI MEETING

28 MAR - jtf-rh stands down 

February:

2 feb - governor’s water committee

8 FEB - Rh Remediation RoundTable

8 Feb - Salt lake NB AND ewa beach NB

13 Feb - Aiea NB

15 FEB - CRI meeting

20 feb - nanakuli nB

22 feb - DISF meeting 

26 feb - wahiawa NB

27 feb - pearl city NB

residual fuel

click on thumbnail to view video

5 9 1 1 7

Visit the Navy Closure Task Force-Red Hill

Website by Scanning or clicking

the QR code below

*AMOUNT IS APPROXIMATE JTF-RH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING approximately 60,000 gallons of residual fuel
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Forests of Illinois**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |2019
2020
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.163/13:
Item Number:0084-N-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:
 
March 12, 2018
### §763. Treatment of accounts

(a) Accounts held by the debtor for a particular customer in separate capacities shall be treated as accounts of separate customers.

(b) A member of a clearing organization shall be deemed to hold such member's proprietary account in a separate capacity from such member's customers' account.

(c) The net equity in a customer's account may not be offset against the net equity in the account of any other customer.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2618; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §486, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

Section 763 provides for separate treatment of accounts held in separate capacities. A deficit in one account held for a customer may not be offset against the net equity in another account held by the same customer in a separate capacity or held by another customer.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353 substituted "by the debtor for" for "by" and "treated as" for "deemed to be".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
#### § 39.407 How long must a school maintain records?

The responsible administrative official for each school must maintain records relating to ISEP, supplemental services, and transportation-related expenditures. The official must maintain these records in appropriate retrievable storage for at least the four years prior to the current school year, unless Federal records retention schedules require a longer period.
#### Edward J. Gozzett, Respondent, v. Albert Plaut and Joseph Plaut, Appellants.

Motion denied. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ.
# C_2006294EN.01003804.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/38

---

Order of the President of the Court of 23 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-137/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/79)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 03.06.2006.

1

---
§ 515.2 Definitions. For the purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
( b ) *Maintain* means store, collect, use, or disseminate.
( c ) *Record* means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by the Commission, including education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history, and that contains the individual's name, or identifying number, symbol, or other identifier assigned to the individual, such as social security number, finger or voice print, or photograph.
( d ) *System of records* means a group of any records under the control of the Commission from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifier assigned to the individual.
( e ) *Routine use* means use of a record for a purpose that is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected.
( f ) *Working day* means a Federal workday that does not include Saturdays, Sundays, or Federal holidays.