alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Policy 
-  Statements 
-  PBGC Statement On Central States’ Repayment of $126.5 Mil... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# PBGC Statement on Central States’ Repayment of $126.5 Million in Special Financial Assistance

April 8, 2024

PBGC is committed to effective stewardship of taxpayer funds. On April 8, 2024, the Central States Pension Plan (Central States) returned to the U.S. Government more than $126.5 million—the portion of the SFA amount paid to the plan based on inaccurate participant census data.

PBGC has been coordinating for several months with the PBGC’s Office of the Inspector General, the Department of Justice’s Civil Division, and Central States to achieve an appropriate resolution. PBGC appreciates their collaborative efforts in facilitating this recovery.

With respect to other plans that received SFA before PBGC expanded the scope of its independent death audit, PBGC has full census data audits underway. PBGC is committed to facilitating the return of SFA amounts made to those plans based on inaccurate census data.

**About PBGC**

PBGC protects the retirement security of over 31 million American workers, retirees, and beneficiaries in both single-employer and multiemployer private sector pension plans. The agency’s two insurance programs are legally separate and operationally and financially independent. PBGC is directly responsible for the benefits of nearly 1.4 million participants and beneficiaries in failed single-employer pension plans. The Single-Employer Program is financed by insurance premiums, investment income, and assets and recoveries from failed single-employer plans. The Multiemployer Program is financed by insurance premiums and investment income. Special financial assistance for financially troubled multiemployer plans is financed by general taxpayer monies.
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 1 OF WEBB COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on December 17, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment between

Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellant

V.

Ricardo Guadalupe Tenorio, Appellee

No. 04-14-00292-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2013CVK001755C1

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order 

granting Appellee Ricardo Guadalupe Tenorio’s petition for expunction is 

REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED denying Appellee Ricardo 

Guadalupe Tenorio’s petition for expunction. Costs of this appeal are taxed 

against Appellant Ricardo Guadalupe Tenorio.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of 

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on February 25, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00292-CV

Texas Department of Public Safety

v.

Ricardo Guadalupe Tenorio

(NO. 2013CVK001755C1 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 1 OF WEBB COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

REPORTER'S RECORD

FILING

$42.00

$195.00

PAID

EXEMPT N/A

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF 

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of 

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and 

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Fourth District of Texas, this February 25, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Exhibit
32.2

Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of The Knot, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Richard Szefc, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.

|                   |                                        
|------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|                   | /s/ Richard Szefc                      
|                   |                                        
|                   | Richard Szefc
  Chief Financial Officer
|                   |                                        
|Date: May 11, 2006 |                                        

---
### [§2541a. Renumbered §4982]
**EXHIBIT 34.1**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Board of Directors andShareholders 

The Huntington National Bank 

Columbus, Ohio 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanyingManagement’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that The Huntington National Bank (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Automobile Loan Platform (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(i.D),1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management’s assertion identifiesthe individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted inaccordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance withthe servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period coveredby this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that mayhave occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 for the Automobile Loan Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Columbus,Ohio 

March 15, 2013
# C_2006212EN.01002903.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/29

---

Action brought on 26 April 2006 — Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret and Akar v Commission

(Case T-129/06)

(2006/C 212/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi (Cankaya/Ankara, Turkey) and M. Akar (Cankaya/Ankara, Turkey) (represented by: C. Sahin, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Reservation of rights to bring a claim for damages; |
| --- | --- |

—

Reservation of rights to bring a claim for damages;

| — | Suspension, as a matter of priority, of implementation of the procedure with regard to the subject-matter of the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Suspension, as a matter of priority, of implementation of the procedure with regard to the subject-matter of the present proceedings;

| — | Annulment of the procedure of 23 December 2005 with the number MK/KS/DELTUR/(2005)/SecE/D/1614 which is the subject-matter of the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the procedure of 23 December 2005 with the number MK/KS/DELTUR/(2005)/SecE/D/1614 which is the subject-matter of the present proceedings;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants are contesting the decision of the European Commission Delegation in Turkey of 23 December 2005 which was addressed to the applicants with regard to the call for tenders in respect of the construction of educational establishments in the provinces of Diyarbakir and Siirt.

The applicants submit, inter alia, that their tender was the lowest and that the file in respect thereof was complete and therefore the contract should have been awarded to them. Furthermore, they submit that the contested decision infringes European Union law.

inter alia

---
### [§2609. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title II, §253(9), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 235]

Section, added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title II, §242(f)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1605, related to acceptance of contributions from allies for Theater Missile Defense programs and establishment and use of Theater Missile Defense Cooperation Account.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Jean F.H.P. Mandeville, Chief Financial Officer, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the registrant.



Date: May 10, 2005



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/    JEAN F.H.P.
MANDEVILLE                 
|Jean F.H.P. Mandeville Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period
ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Mueller, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/
      John P. MuellerJohn
      P. MuellerChief
      Financial Officer


Date: November9,2010
# DATA BOOK LISTING

# GLANCE

# S-1

# S-2

# S-3

# S-4

# S-5

# S-6

# S-7

# S-8

# S-9

# S-10

# S-11

# S-12

# S-13

# S-14

# S-15

# S-16

# S-17

# S-18

# S-19

# S-20

# S-21

# S-22

# S-23

# S-24

# S-25

# S-26

# S-27

# S-28

# S-29

# S-30

# S-31

# S-32

# S-33

&10&F		&10&D

# S-34

# S-35

# S-36

# S-37

# S-38

# S-39

# S-40

# S-41

# S-42

# S-43

# S-44

# S-45

# S-46

# S-47

# S-48

# S-49

# S-50

# S-51

# S-52

# S-53

# M-1

# M-2

# M-3

# M-4

# M-5

# M-6

# M-7

# M-8

# M-9

# M-10

# M-11

# M-12

# M-13

# M-14

# M-15

# M-16

&10&F		&10&D

# M-17
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : Speeches / Testimony

# AUSA Meeting: Role of Land Forces In Ensuring Access To Shared Domains

By ADM Harry B. Harris, Jr.U.S. Pacific Command

**Adm. Harry Harris Jr.**

**Commander, U.S. Pacific Command**

**Association of the United States Army (AUSA) Meeting **

**Defense Services Asia Exhibition**

**“Role of Land Forces In Ensuring Access To Shared Domains”**

*As Prepared for Delivery*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Speeches/Testimony
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 584 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 21, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4919) to amend the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act to make 
improvements to certain defense and security assistance provisions under those 
Acts, to authorize the transfer of naval vessels to certain foreign countries, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 170.804 Who should be contacted if a Tribal transportation facility is not being maintained to TTP standards due to insufficient funding? The Tribe may notify BIA or FHWA if the Tribe believes that a facility on the NTTFI is not being adequately maintained to the standards identified in § 170.803. If BIA or FHWA determines that a Tribal transportation facility is not being maintained, it will: ( a ) Notify the facility owner;
( b ) Provide a draft copy of the report to the affected Tribe for comment before forwarding it to Secretary of Transportation; and
( c ) Report these findings to the appropriate office within FHWA.
### [§9741. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1072(c), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2058]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 587, related to control and supervision of transportation of members, munitions of war, equipment, military property, and stores of the Air Force.
Exhibit 10.1

                       Generation Purchase Right Agreement
                       Purchase Right Extension Agreement
                              Dated March 26, 2005


The undersigned,  authorized representatives of KeySpan Corporation and the Long
Island  Lighting  Company  d/b/a LIPA,  hereby agree to extend the option period
under  the terms of the  Generation  Purchase  Right  Agreement  ("GPRA")  until
December 15, 2005.  Under no  circumstances  will this option be extended beyond
December 15, 2005.

It is agreed that during this time period the parties will work in good faith to
resolve various issues including a possible settlement under the GPRA with terms
and  conditions  acceptable  to both  parties as well as other  issues which may
impact the future of both companies going forward,  including  KeySpan's  future
relationship and contracts with LIPA.


LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY d/b/a LIPA

By: /s/ Richard M. Kessel
Name: Richard M. Kessel
Title: Chairman



KEYSPAN CORPORATION

By:/s/ Robert B. Catell
Name: Robert B. Catell
Title: Chairman & CEO
# C **ORBETT** 

# P **RICE** 

# L **AW**

**. 612 SPRUCE STREET**  **SCRANTON, PA 18503 Joeprice@CorbettPricelaw.com** 

**570**

**- 955** 

**- 7418** 

**RE: Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012** 

Dear Sir or Madam:
We represent Kapeesh Enterprises, LLC, a Pennsylvania Limited Liability Company doing business as Access Aerial (“ **Access Aerial** ”). We are writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures contained in 14 C.F.R 11, to request that Access Aerial, an owner and operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations listed below so that Access Aerial may operate its small, lightweight Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“UAS”) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). Founded by John Culkin of Scranton, PA and Lee DeAngelis of Jessup, PA, Access Aerial has become the Northeastern Pennsylvania’s leaders in capturing high definition aerial imagery through the use of its UASs. Mr. Culkin and Mr. DeAngelis have logged hundreds of flight hours over the past two (2) years with their DJI Phantom UASs, always ensuring that flights are conducted in a safe manner and in accordance with the FAA guid elines. Access Aerial has been a leading advocate for the safe and proper use of UASs by hobbyists. Through their videos posted to many social media outlets such as YouTube and Facebook, Access Aerial has garnered the attention of several print and
televis ion news sources and has utilized each opportunity to promote and stress the importance of hobbyists using their UASs in accordance with FAA regulations. To this date, Access Aerial has refused a multitude of advances made by area businesses and individuals alike to use their aerial imagery capabilities for commercial purposes. Based primarily in Scranton, Pennsylvania, Access Aerial now seeks permission to fly its UASs commercially in the United States to capture aerial imagery for local Northeastern Pennsylvania Businesses and First Responders. Northeastern Pennsylvania is in dire need of an influx of business. Access Aerial seeks to use its expertise in t he area of aerial imagery capturing to bring this much needed new business to
the local area. Granting Access Aerial’s exemption will be granting Northeastern Pennsylvania the right to believe that there is hope on the horizon in the form of a modernizatio n of business practices.

Respectfully Submitted,

_________________________ Joseph Gardner Price, Esq. Corbett Price Law 612 Spruce St. Scranton, PA 18503 Attorney ID 317300
§ 26.9 How do I apply for assistance? ( a ) You should contact the BIA office or the tribal service provider which is nearest to your current residence to get an application form;
( b ) You must complete the application process as established by your servicing office; and
( c ) You must complete and sign a comprehensive ISP (or an individual development plan (IDP) or employment development plan (EDP), which are synonymous with an ISP).