alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

Calendar No. 178

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1027

[Report No. 106–96]

To reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the

Deschutes Resources Conservancy, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 12, 1999

Mr. SMITH of Oregon (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

JUNE 24, 1999

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the Deschutes Resources Conservancy, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deschutes Resources

5 Conservancy Reauthorization Act of 1999’’.
2

S 1027 RS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PARTICIPATION OF BUREAU OF

2 RECLAMATION IN DESCHUTES RESOURCES

3 CONSERVANCY.

4 Section 301 of the Oregon Resource Conservation Act

5 of 1996 (division B of Public Law 104–208; 110 Stat.

6 3009–534) is amended—

7 (1) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting before the

8 period at the end the following: ‘‘, and up to a total

9 amount of $2,000,000 during each of fiscal years

10 2002 through 2006’’; and

11 (2) in subsection (h), by inserting before the pe12 riod at the end the following: ‘‘and $2,000,000 for

13 each of fiscal years 2002 through 2006’’.

Calendar No. 178

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1027

[Report No. 106–96]

A BILL

To reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of

vancy, and for other purposes.Reclamation in the Deschutes Resources ConserJUNE 24, 1999

Reported without amendment
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-134 

March 8, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4043(b)(3) Reportable Events. Decrease in Participants

4062(e). Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans. Closing of Facility Affecting More Than 20% of Plan

Participants 

OPINION: 

 This is in reference to your request for a determination of the effect under Title IV of the Employee Retirement

Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") of certain events relating to * * * (the "Plan"). 

As we understand the facts, the Plan is maintained solely for hourly employees at one of * * * (the "Company")

plants in * * * The plant is being re-located within * * * and in connection therewith more than 20% of the active

participants will be laid-off or discharged. The remaining active participants will continue participation (i.e. accruals

and vesting) under the Plan while those laid-off or discharged with vested rights under the Plan will retain such rights

and the Company will continue to fund them. 

Under the foregoing facts there is neither a termination of the Plan under Title IV of the Act nor do the provisions

of Sec. 4062(e) of the Act apply. A reportable event under Sec. 4043(b)(3) of the Act has occurred, and a notice must

be sent to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Division of Plan [*2] Review, by the plan administrator within

30 days of his knowing or having reason to know of the occurrence of the reportable event. Based on the information

provided in your letter and its exhibits, there appears to be no need or basis for terminating the Plan. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 573 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 573

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death 
    of the Honorable Herbert H. Bateman, a Representative from the 
                       Commonwealth of Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2000

Mr. Bliley submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death 
    of the Honorable Herbert H. Bateman, a Representative from the 
                       Commonwealth of Virginia.

    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the 
death of the Honorable Herbert H. Bateman, a Representative from the 
Commonwealth of Virginia.
    Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the House as the 
Speaker may designate, together with such Members of the Senate as may 
be joined, be appointed to attend the funeral.
    Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be authorized and 
directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the 
provisions of these resolutions and that the necessary expenses in 
connection therewith be paid out of applicable accounts of the House.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the 
Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a 
further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Application of James J. Ennis for the Appointment of Appraisers, etc., v. The Federal Brewing Company.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present'—Woodward,, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.*

*

 See 123 App. Div. 691.—[Rep.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-14 

May 26, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4063 Liability of Substantial Employer for Withdrawal

4063(d) Liability of Substantial Employer for Withdrawal. Partitioning of Plan

4064 Liability of Employers in Multiple Employer & Multiemployer Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") partition the * *

* and * * * Pension Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to section 4063(d) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

1974 ("ERISA"). 

As we understand the pertinent facts, at all relevant times, the Plan was a multiemployer plan covered under Title

IV of ERISA. A Inc. * * * and B Company * * * withdrew from the Plan on March 31, 1977. During the five years prior

to the withdrawal, A and B each made about 15 percent of the total plan contributions. As of March 31, 1977, the Plan's

assets were approximately $3.9 million. The Plan's unfunded guaranteed benefits were approximately $2.0 million. A's

section 4063 liability, as of the date of withdrawal, is approximately $300,000. B's liability is also about $300,000. 

Section 4063(d) authorizes PBGC to partition a plan upon the withdrawal of an employer or employers and treat

a portion of the plan as a terminated plan and [*2] the remainder as a separate plan. PBGC is required to allocate the

plan fund equitably between the two plans. 

In deciding whether to partition a plan, the PBGC must first determine that an employer's withdrawal from the plan

"has resulted, or will result, in a significant reduction in the amount of aggregate contributions to the plan. . ." Section

4063(d). The PBGC must then determine that partitioning "is consistent with the purposes of this section 4063 and

section 4064 and is more appropriate in the particular case." Section 4063(d). 

The PBGC has determined that it will not partition a plan to which more than one employer contributes unless it

finds: (1) as a result of a withdrawal or withdrawals, contributions to or under the plan will be required to be increased

unreasonably in order to meet the minimum funding standards of ERISA or to pay benefits when due, (2) participants

would not be unduly prejudiced by a partition, and (3) partitioning would not significantly increase the risk of loss to

the PBGC. 

 After examining the information that you provided, PBGC has determined that contributions to the Plan would not

be required to increase unreasonably in order to meet ERISA's [*3] minimum funding standards or to pay benefits when

due as a result of the withdrawals of A and B. Therefore, PBGC will not exercise its discretion to partition the Plan. 

I hope this information is of assistance. 

Robert E. Nagle 

Executive Director
#### Samuel D. Sewards, Respondent, *v.*Adolph Kessler, Appellant.

(Argued February 15, 1877;

decided April 27, 1877.)

*Samuel*Hand, for appellant.

*Delano C. Colvin,*for respondent.

Agree to affirm. No opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
#### STATE v. JAMES

No. 548P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 275

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1990.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

BENJAMIN WEEMS KING 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM RETIRED STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 47 DB 2016 (No. 55 RST 2016) 

Attorney Registration No. 50249 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated July 15, 2016, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

Benjamin Weems King, who has been on Retired Status, has never been suspended or 

disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and 

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, 

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall 

be paid by the Petitioner. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

84-4 

April 20, 1984 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022 Benefits Guaranteed

4022(a) Benefits Guaranteed. Type of Benefits Guaranteed 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your inquiry regarding the termination of the Employee Pension Plan of * * * (the "Plan").

Specifically, you have asked whether participants whose benefits under the Plan vested as a result of a partial termination

that occurred prior to the termination of the Plan would be entitled to guaranteed benefits. 

You have asserted that partial terminations of the Plan occurred in 19 * * *, 19 and 19 * * *, and that assets of the

Plan were not sufficient to provide the full amount of vested benefits to participants affected by those partial terminations.

The Plan terminated on or about * * *. 

Under 29 U.S.C. § 1322(a) (1982), the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") ". . . shall guarantee . .

. the payment of all nonforfeitable benefits (other than benefits becoming nonforfeitable solely on account of the

termination of a plan) under a single employer plan which terminates at a time when section 1321 applies to it." Title

29 U.S.C. § 1321 applied to the Plan when it terminated. Therefore, all participants with vested benefits as of * * *, are

entitled to a guaranteed benefit. [*2] 

Guaranteed benefits under the Plan include all benefits vested under the terms of the Plan. Those benefits which

became vested solely on account of termination or partial termination of the Plan are not guaranteed. Thus, those

participants, vested under the terms of the Plan, who were affected by a partial termination of the Plan are still entitled

to a guaranteed benefit. Those participants, though, who became vested solely on account of the termination or partial

termination are not entitled to a guaranteed benefit. 

If you have further questions regarding this matter, please contact * * * at (202) 254-7224. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### § 18.304 What happens if the Department approves the single heir rule?

If we approve the single heir rule, we will notify the tribe of the approval and forward a copy of the single heir rule to OHA.
- Cover 
- Title page
- Contents
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Acknowledgements
- Study Area
- Methods
- Results
Hydrology
Wood stork populations
Wood storks and water conditions
Fish populations
Wood stork and fish availability

- Discussion
Requirements for successful nesting
Relation of wood storks to water supplies
Wood storks as an indicator of ecological stability

- Literature cited
#### § 67.15 Special instructions.

To facilitate the work of the Superintendent and Area Director, the Assistant Secretary may issue special instructions not inconsistent with the regulations in this part.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 31, 2015



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC
**US DeDartment** **Transport Airplane** **Directorate u.b.** **ueparrmenT 1601** **Ljnd Avenue** **of Transportation** **Renton, Washington** **98057-3356 Federal** **Aviation Administrator!** **March 29,** **2012**

### Rafael**Gustavo Fassina** **Marques Airworthiness** **Office Embraer** **S.A. Av.** **Brigadeiro Faria** **Lima, 2.170** **12227-901 SJ.** **dos Campos** **SP Brasil** **Dear Mr. Marques:** 

### We**have received** **your March** **9,2012 petition** **(letter no.** **GCF-173/2012), on** **behalf of** **Embraer S.A.,** **requesting an** **exemption from** **25.809(a) of** **Title 14,** **Code of** **Federal Regulations** **(14 CFR).** **This exemption,** **if granted,** **would permit** **relief from** **the overwing** **emergency exit** **requirements the** **wing and** **ground from** **the unopened** **exit on** **Embraer Model** **EMB-550 airplanes.** 

### Your**petition has** **been added** **to public** **docket no.** **FAA-2012-0302 and** **is being** **processed. Please** **re-petition to** **adequately address** **the Public** **Interest statement** **requirement of** **14 CFR** 

### 11.81(d):**The reasons** **why granting** **your request** **would be** **in the** **public interest;** **that is,** **how it** **would benefit** **the public** **as a whole.** **If you** **have questions** **in the** **meantime, you** **may call** **Jayson Claar** **at (425)** **227-2194, e-mail** **jayson.claar@faa.gov. Sincerely,** **Franklin Tiangsing** **Standardization Branch** **Transport Airplane** **Directorate Federal** **Aviation Administration**
# C_2006326EN.01003601.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/36

---

Action brought on 26 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-444/06)

(2006/C 326/76)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis, acting as Agent, C. Fernandez Vicién and I. Moreno-Tapia Rivas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendan: Kingdom of Spain

Defendan:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to provide for a mandatory period within which the contracting authority has to notify the decision on the award of the contract to all the bidders, by failing to provide for a mandatory waiting period between the decision on the award of the contract and its performance and by allowing an annulled contract to continue to have legal effect, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC (1) of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to provide for a mandatory period within which the contracting authority has to notify the decision on the award of the contract to all the bidders, by failing to provide for a mandatory waiting period between the decision on the award of the contract and its performance and by allowing an annulled contract to continue to have legal effect, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC (1) of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts

1

| — | order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission considers that the Spanish rule on the review of public contracts is not consistent with Directive 89/665 according to the interpretation given by the Court of Justice in Case C-81/98 Alcatel Austria and Others [1999] ECR I-7671.

Alcatel Austria and Others

In particular, the Spanish legislation:

does not provide for a mandatory period within which the contracting authority has to notify the decision on the award of the contract to all the bidders,

does not provide for a mandatory waiting period between the decision on the award of the contract and its performance and,

allows an annulled contract to continue to have legal effect.

---

(1)  OJ 1989 L 395, p.33.

1

---
MÁS

2007

Asma

El asma es una enfermedad 

que afecta las vías respiratorias 

que van a los pulmones. Las 

vías respiratorias se inflaman 

y expanden al reaccionar con 

facilidad a ciertos factores, tales 

como los virus, el humo o el polen. 

Cuando las vías respiratorias 

inflamadas reaccionan, se vuelven 

estrechas, lo cual causa problemas 

para respirar. 

En los Estados Unidos, alrededor 

de 20 millones de personas tienen 

asma. Casi 5 millones de ellas son 

niños, muchos de los cuales superan 

el asma en la adolescencia. Esta 

afección causa 5.000 muertes por 

año. Es posible que sea hereditaria.

No es posible curar el asma, pero se 

puede controlar. 

¿Cómo sé si tengo asma? 

Algunos de los posibles síntomas 

del asma son: 

• Tos

• Sibilancia (una especie de silbido 

en el pecho al respirar)

• Falta de aliento 

• Sensación de opresión en el pecho

Muchos factores pueden provocar 

o empeorar una crisis asmática, 

como por ejemplo: 

• La exposición a alérgenos (polvo 

del hogar (ácaros, cucarachas, 

etc.) 

• Las infecciones víricas de los 

pulmones y las vías respiratorias 

• El humo de tabaco y ciertos 

contaminantes externos 

(sustancias químicas o polvo en el 

aire) 

• El ejercicio físico

• El aire frio

¿A qué edad se puede tener asma? 

Algunas personas contraen asma 

durante la infancia, mientras que 

otras desarrollan la enfermedad a 

una edad más avanzada. El asma 

puede o no superarse con los años. 

Creo que tengo asma. ¿Qué 

pruebas debo realizarme? 

• Pruebas para medir la apertura de 

sus vías respiratorias 

• Radiografía de tórax 

• Pruebas para averiguar si la 

dificultad para respirar es causada 

por alergias o una enfermedad del 

corazón (cardiopatía).

Asthma
FDA Office of Women’s Health http://www.fda.gov/womens

TAKE TIME TO CARE... For yourself, for those who need you.

¿Cómo se puede controlar el 

asma? 

• Consulte a su médico. 

• Pídale a su médico un plan de 

tratamiento y sígalo. 

• Esté atento a los primeros signos 

y responda rápido. 

• Manténgase alejado de los 

factores que empeoran su asma. 

¿Cuál es el tratamiento para el 

asma? 

Se utilizan muchos medicamentos 

para tratar el asma, con y sin receta 

médica. Consulte a su médico 

para que le aconseje el mejor 

medicamento para usted. 

Si alguien tiene una crisis asmática:

• Identifique los signos: 

o La persona deja de jugar o 

trabajar y no puede continuar 

con lo que estaba haciendo.

o La persona tiene gran dificultad 

para respirar.

o La persona tiene dificultad para 

caminar o hablar.

• Conserve la calma y relájese.

• Busque el inhalador de la persona. 

• Aleje al individuo de lo que causó 

la crisis asmática (el factor que 

provoca la alergia).

• Llame al 911 si la persona no puede 

respirar bien o si los labios o uñas 

presentan un color azulado.

Para obtener más información:

Centro de Información del Instituto Nacional de Salud del Corazón, el Pulmón y la Sangre

Teléfono: 301-592-8573 (Se habla Español)

http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov

Asma