alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5.1


 



THIS PROMISSORY NOTE (“NOTE”) TO WHICH THIS AMENDMENT RELATES
HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”). SUCH NOTE, AS AMENDED, HAS BEEN
ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT ONLY AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR ASSIGNED IN THE ABSENCE OF REGISTRATION OF THE RESALE THEREOF UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY IN FORM, SCOPE AND SUBSTANCE TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH REGISTRATION
IS NOT REQUIRED.


 


AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	Principal Amount:	
    up to $350,000 (consisting of the original principal amount of
$300,000 and an additional principal amount of $50,000)
	Dated as of September 20, 2021


 


(as set forth on the Schedule of Borrowings attached hereto)


 


Cartica Acquisition Corp, a Cayman Islands exempted
company and blank check company (the “Maker”), hereby amends its promissory note dated as of February 9, 2021
to:


 


		(a)	increase the principal amount that it promises to pay to the
order of Cartica Acquisition Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or its registered assigns or successors in interest
(the “Payee”), from the original principal sum of up to three hundred thousand U.S. dollars ($300,000) to the principal
sum of up to three hundred fifty thousand dollars ($350,000) (as set forth on the Schedule of Borrowings attached hereto) in lawful money
of the United States of America, and



 


		(b)	revise the date on which the principal balance of this Note
shall be payable by the Maker to be the earlier of: (i) December 31, 2021 or (ii) the date on which Maker consummates
an initial public offering of its securities (the “IPO”).



 


All of the other terms of the promissory note dated
as of February 9, 2021 remain unchanged and in effect.


 


[Signature page follows]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker, intending to be legally bound hereby,
has caused this Note to be duly executed by the undersigned as of the day and year first above written.


 


	 	CARTICA ACQUISITION CORP
	 	A Cayman Islands exempted company
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ C. Brian Coad
	 	 	Name:   C. Brian Coad
	 	 	Title:     Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer


 


[Signature
Page to Promissory Note]


 




     


     


    

 


SCHEDULE OF BORROWINGS


 


The following increases or decreases in this Promissory Note have been
made:


 


	Date of 
 Increase or 
 Decrease	 	Amount of decrease in 
 Principal Amount of this 
 Promissory Note	 	Amount of increase in 
 Principal Amount of this 
 Promissory Note	 	 	Principal Amount of this 
 Promissory Note following such 
 decrease or increase	 
	September 20, 2021	 	NA	 	$	50,000	 	 	$	350,000	 



 


[Schedule of Borrowings to Amendment to Promissory Note]
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 11, 2016

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-2390

Lower Tribunal No. 08-15692

________________



### Reginald Johnson

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge Rodriguez-Chomat

, Judge.

Reginald Johnson

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.The defendant, Reginald Johnson, appeals the trial court’s summary denial

of his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Out of the thirteen separate claims

the defendant raises, we find only one to have merit. Accordingly, we reverse and

remand only as to Claim 12 in the defendant’s motion.

In Claim 12, the defendant contends his counsel was ineffective for failing to

call three defense witnesses at trial. The trial court concluded that the defendant’s

motion “failed to state with particularity the names and addresses of the witnesses

as well as the content of their anticipated testimony and the effects this testimony

would have on the verdict.”

However, a review of the motion indicates that the defendant did, in fact,

state the names of the witnesses, allege they were available for trial, set forth the

specific testimony they would have given, and state its impact on, and

contradiction of, the state witnesses’ testimony. If there was any insufficiency, it is

only the failure to set forth the addresses of these three named witnesses. The trial

court should have permitted the defendant an opportunity to amend to add this

information. Spera v. State

, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007); Lena v. State

, 22 So. 3d

786, 788 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). There is nothing in the State’s response to the

defendant’s motion, or attached to the trial court’s order, that refutes the

defendant’s allegations in Claim 12. In addition, there is no finding that, if these

2allegations were established, there is no reasonable probability of a different

outcome.

Consequently, we affirm the trial court’s order as to all claims, with the

exception of Claim 12. With respect to Claim 12, we reverse and remand for

further proceedings solely on that claim. In the event that the trial court determines

that Claim 12 is insufficient on its face (for failing to include the addresses of the

three named witnesses) it should, consistent with Florida Rule of Criminal

Procedure 3.850 (f)(2), enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing the

defendant sixty (60) days to amend to set forth a legally sufficient claim.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

3
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1051

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1999

Referred to the Committee on Commerce

AN ACT

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic Petroleum Reserve more effectively,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1051 RFH

1 SECTION 1. Title I of the Energy Policy and Con2 servation Act (42 U.S.C. 6211–6251) is amended—

3 (a) In section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246), by insert4 ing ‘‘through 2003’’ after ‘‘1999’’.

5 (b) In section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251), by strik6 ing ‘‘1999’’ each place it appears and inserting

7 ‘‘2003’’.

8 SEC. 2. Title II of the Energy Policy and Conserva9 tion Act (42 U.S.C. 6261–6285) is amended—

10 (a) In section 256(h) (42 U.S.C. 6276(h)), by

11 inserting ‘‘through 2003’’ after ‘‘1997’’.

12 (b) In section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285), by strik13 ing ‘‘1999’’ each place it appears and inserting

14 ‘‘2003’’.

Passed the Senate September 29, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
# C_2006198EN.01000101.xml

| 23.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 August 2006

(2006/C 198/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2812 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4610 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67840 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1973 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5777 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,85 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5759 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,168 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,53 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9005 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5290 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8649 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6804 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4317 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9632 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0089 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0177 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 225,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1363 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2066 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2880 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 621,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,710 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,738 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2730 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,192 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2812

JPY

Japanese yen

149,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4610

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67840

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1973

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5777

ISK

Iceland króna

89,85

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5759

CZK

Czech koruna

28,168

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,53

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9005

RON

Romanian leu

3,5290

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,655

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8649

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6804

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4317

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9632

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0089

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0177

KRW

South Korean won

1 225,28

ZAR

South African rand

9,1363

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2066

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2880

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 621,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,710

PHP

Philippine peso

65,738

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2730

THB

Thai baht

48,192

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Workers & Retirees 
-  Benefits 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Benefits

## Guaranteed Benefits

PBGC guarantees basic plan pension benefits, including pension benefits at normal retirement age, most early retirement benefits, disability benefits, and annuity benefits for survivors of pension plan participants. Find out more, including our Maximum Monthly Guarantee Tables.

## Payments

Whether you are currently receiving pension payments or entitled to payments in the future, learn how PBGC pays your benefits, including the dates on which we will mail your checks or pay you by Electronic Direct Deposit.

## Beneficiaries

PBGC makes three distinct types of payments to beneficiaries. See who qualifies and how to designate a beneficiary.

## Appealing Formal Determinations

If you can provide a specific reason why PBGC’s formal determination of your benefit is wrong, you may appeal the PBGC determination within 45 days.

March 2, 2021

##           Contact Us      

Visit our Contact Us page for more information.

##           Health Coverage Tax Credit (HCTC)          

If you are receiving benefit payments from PBGC, you may be able to receive the Health Coverage Tax Credit (HCTC) to help cover a portion of the cost of your family's monthly health care premiums.
                                  - Health Coverage Tax Credit

##           Qualified Domestic Relations Orders          

All or part of a participant’s benefit may be assigned to one or more other people through domestic relations orders relating to child support, alimony payments, or marital property rights of a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent.

##           State Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association Offices          

Find information about state guaranty associations that protect payments under annuities purchased from private insurance companies.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2006326EN.01000201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/2 |

---

Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court

(2006/C 326/05)

At its meeting on 11 October 2006, the Court drew up the list, referred to in Article 11b(2) of the Rules of Procedure, for the purposes of determining the composition of the Grand Chamber as follows:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Schintgen |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr von Danwitz |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Tizzano |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Bonichot |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Cunha Rodrigues |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Lindh |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Silva de Lapuerta |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Bay Larsen |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Schiemann |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Ó Caoimh |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Makarczyk |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Levits |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Kūris |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Lõhmus |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Juhász |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Klučka |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Arestis |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Malenovský |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Borg Barthet |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Ilešič |

At its meeting on 11 October 2006, the Court drew up the lists, referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure, for the purposes of determining the composition of the Chambers of five Judges as follows:

First Chamber

Mr Schintgen

Mr Levits

Mr Tizzano

Mr Ilešič

Mr Borg Barthet

Second Chamber

Mr Schiemann

Mr Bonichot

Mr Makarczyk

Mr Bay Larsen

Mr Kūris

Third Chamber

Mr Cunha Rodrigues

Ms Lindh

Mr Klučka

Mr Ó Caoimh

Mr Lõhmus

Fourth Chamber

Ms Silva de Lapuerta

Mr von Danwitz

Mr Juhász

Mr Malenovský

Mr Arestis

At its meeting on 13 October 2006, the Court drew up the lists, referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure, for the purposes of determining the composition of the Chambers of three Judges as follows:

Fifth Chamber

Mr Tizzano

Mr Borg Barthet

Mr Ilešič

Mr Levits

Sixth Chamber

Mr Schiemann

Mr Makarczyk

Mr Bay Larsen

Mr Bonichot

Seventh Chamber

Mr Cunha Rodrigues

Mr Lõhmus

Mr Ó Caoimh

Ms Lindh

Eighth Chamber

Ms Silva de Lapuerta

Mr Arestis

Mr Malenovský

Mr von Danwitz

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**IDEAEDGE, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IdeaEdge, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Shultz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 98 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 98

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
concurrent resolutions on the budget not carry an estimated deficit for 
                  the budget year or for any outyear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1999

   Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. Sweeney) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
concurrent resolutions on the budget not carry an estimated deficit for 
                  the budget year or for any outyear.

Whereas Congress needs a social security surplus accountability initiative;
Whereas the unified budget surplus over the next 10 years will total more than 
        $2,500,000,000,000;
Whereas the social security surplus over the next 10 years will total more than 
        $1,700,000,000,000;
Whereas the social security surplus remains vulnerable while there is an on-
        budget deficit; and
Whereas all payroll tax revenues paid into social security should be spent only 
        for social security tax purposes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``7. (a) It shall not be in order to consider any concurrent 
resolution on the budget that carries an estimated deficit for the 
budget year or for any of the 4 ensuing fiscal years.
    ``(b) Paragraph (a) may be waived only by the affirmative vote of 
three-fifths of the Members voting.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.7


 


MOUNTAIN
CREST ACQUISITION CORP. V

311 West 43rd Street, 12th Floor

New York, NY 10036


 


[_______],
2021


 


Mountain
Crest Global Holdings LLC

311 West 43rd Street, 12th Floor

New York, NY 10036


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration
statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of Mountain Crest Acquisition Corp. V (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of
(i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described
in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Mountain
Crest Global Holdings LLC (“Sponsor”) shall make available to the Company certain office space, secretarial
and administrative services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 311 West 43rd Street, 12th Floor, New York,
NY 10036 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Sponsor a sum not to exceed $10,000 per month, respectively,
on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Sponsor hereby agrees that it does not have any right,
title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
that may be established by the Company for the benefit of the Company’s public stockholders upon the consummation of the IPO as
described in the Registration Statement (“Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as
a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust
Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	MOUNTAIN CREST ACQUISITION CORP. V
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Suying Liu
	 	Name:  	Suying
    Liu
	 	Title:  	Chief
    Executive Officer


 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 	 
	MOUNTAIN CREST GLOBAL HOLDINGS LLC	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Suying Liu	 
	Name:	Suying
    Liu	 
	Title:	Member
#### IN RE APPEAL OF COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION DECISION

No. 21P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 468

Petition by North Topsail Water and Sewer pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 March 1990.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****TCUP Central : expanding thefuture of tribal education**
 
Volumes: One | Two | Three | Four
 
SuDoc Number:HH 14.2:T 21/
Item Number:0599-Q (online)
CGP systemNumber:000871000
 
December 19, 2017
EX-35.1
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corp.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
COMM 2012-CCRE2


March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard  Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
§ 171.600 What information is collected and retained on the irrigation service I receive? We will collect and retain at least the following information as part of our record of the irrigation service we have provided you: ( a ) Your name;
( b ) Delivery point(s) where service was provided;
( c ) Beginning date and time of your irrigation service;
( d ) Ending date and time of your irrigation service; and
( e ) Amount of water we delivered to your farm unit.
### [§2372a. Renumbered §3763]
§ 700.1 Purpose. The purpose of this part is to implement provisions of the Act of December 22, 1974 (Pub. L. 93-531, 88 Stat. 1712 as amended by Pub. L. 96-305, 94 Stat. 929), hereinafter referred to as the Act, in accordance with the following objectives— ( a ) To insure that persons displaced as a result of the Act are treated fairly, consistently, and equitably so that these persons will not suffer the disproportionate adverse, social, economic, cultural and other impacts of relocation.
( b ) To set forth the regulations and procedures by which the Commission shall operate; and implement the provisions of the Act.
( c ) To establish standards consistent with those established in the implementation of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1894, 42 U.S.C. 4601 et. seq., Pub. L. 91-646), hereinafter referred to as the Uniform Act.
( d ) To insure that owners of habitations and other improvements to be acquired pursuant to the Act are treated fairly and consistently, to encourage and expedite acquisition by agreements with such owners, to minimize litigation, relieve congestion in the courts and to promote public confidence in the Commission's relocation program.
( e ) To facilitate development of a relocation plan according to the Act and carry out the directed relocation as promptly and fairly as possible, with a minimum of hardship and discomfort to the relocation, in accordance with the Act.
# C_2006294EN.01002202.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Celle (Germany) lodged on 11 August 2006 — Rechtsanwalt Dr Dirk Rüffert, as the liquidator of the assets of Objekt und Bauregie GmbH & Co KG v Land Niedersachsen

(Case C-346/06)

(2006/C 294/38)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Celle

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rechtsanwalt Dr Dirk Rüffert, as the liquidator of the assets of Objekt und Bauregie GmbH & Co KG

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Niedersachsen

Defendant:

Question referred

Does it amount to an unjustified restriction on the freedom to provide services under the EC Treaty if a public contracting authority is required by statute to award contracts for building services only to undertakings which, when lodging a tender, undertake in writing to pay their employees, when performing those services, at least the remuneration prescribed by the collective agreement in force at the place where those services are performed?

---