alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006212EN.01000501.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 June 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-487/04) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 - Milk and milk products - Skimmed-milk powder - System of traceability of skimmed-milk powder)

(2006/C 212/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Bordes and C. Cattabriga, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: D. Del Gaizo, Agent and D. Del Gaizo, avvocato)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (OJ 1999 L 160, p. 48) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the grant of aid for skimmed milk and skimmed-milk powder intended for animal feed and the sale of such skimmed-milk powder (OJ 1999 L 340, p. 3) — Institution of a system of traceability of milk powder not provided for by Community legislation

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that by unilaterally instituting a system of traceability of skimmed-milk powder for certain uses, not provided for by harmonised provisions of Community law applicable to the sector, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the grant of aid for skimmed milk and skimmed-milk powder intended for animal feed and the sale of such skimmed-milk powder; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by unilaterally instituting a system of traceability of skimmed-milk powder for certain uses, not provided for by harmonised provisions of Community law applicable to the sector, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the grant of aid for skimmed milk and skimmed-milk powder intended for animal feed and the sale of such skimmed-milk powder;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31 of 05.02.2005

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4363]



[[Page 10910]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 30, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call.)
    Contact Person: John K. Hayes, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 959, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-451-
3398. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82eae3fbe7f1e8c2efe3ebeeacecebeaace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="670f061e02140d270a060e0b49090e0f49000811">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 22, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4363 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Dakota Technologies, Inc., a revocable, nonassignable, partially exclusive license in the United States to practice the Government-Owned invention(s) described in U.S. Patent No. 6630947—Method for Examining Subsurface Environments.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, no later than March 11, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the Office of Research and Technology Applications Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific, Code 72120, 53560 Hull St., Bldg. A33 Room 2305, San Diego, CA 92152-5001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Brian Suh, Office of Research and Technology Applications, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific, Code 72120, 53560 Hull St., Bldg. A33 Room 2305, San Diego, CA 92152-5001, telephone 619-553-5118,                         *E-Mail: brian.suh@navy.mil.*

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: February 16, 2011.

D.J. Werner,

                            Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy,                             *Federal Register Liaison Officer.*

[FR Doc. 2011-4194 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Elgar Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Mei, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ John P. Mei         |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| John P. Mei             |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
### **CHAPTER 34—FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL**

Sec.
3301.
Declaration of purpose.
3302.
Definitions.
3303.
Financial Institutions Examination Council.
3304.
Costs and expenses of Council.
3305.
Functions of Council.
3306.
State liaison.
3307.
Administration.
3308.
Access to books, accounts, records, etc., by Council.
3309.
Risk management training.
3310.
Establishment of Appraisal Subcommittee.
3311.
Required review of regulations.
#### § 84.008 What is the effect of the Secretary's disapproval of a contract or agreement that requires Secretarial approval under this part?

If the Secretary disapproves a contract or agreement that requires Secretarial approval under this part, the contract or agreement is invalid as a matter of law.
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


November 16, 2021


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2096


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2096 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined the Registration
Statement File No. 333-259540 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
Exhibit 32.1 to 2008 10-Q

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of Convergys Corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2008 (the Report), I, David F. Dougherty, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ David F. Dougherty 
|David F. Dougherty     
|Chief Executive Officer

November 5, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Convergys Corporation and will be retained by Convergys Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
### SUBCHAPTER XIII—RECEIVERSHIP
H. Res. 569

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 27, 2000.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Linder.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 162.027 What documentation may BIA require in approving, administering, and enforcing leases? ( a ) We may require that the parties provide any pertinent environmental and technical records, reports, and other information (e.g., records of lease payments), related to approval of lease documents and enforcement of leases.
( b ) We will adopt environmental assessments and environmental impact statements prepared by another Federal agency, Indian tribe, entity, or person under 43 CFR 46.320 and 42 CFR 1506.3, including those prepared under 25 U.S.C. 4115 and 25 CFR part 1000, but may require a supplement. We will use any reasonable evidence that another Federal agency has accepted the environmental report, including but not limited to, letters of approval or acceptance.
( c ) Upon our request, the parties must make appropriate records, reports, or information available for our inspection and duplication. We will keep confidential any information that is marked confidential or proprietary and will exempt it from public release to the extent allowed by law and in accordance with 43 CFR part 2. We may, at our discretion, treat a lessee's failure to cooperate with such request, provide data, or grant access to information or records as a lease violation.
### §4653. Prohibition on use of funds to relieve economic dislocations

(a) In order to help avoid the uneconomic use of Department of Defense funds in the procurement of goods and services, the Congress finds that it is necessary to prohibit the use of such funds for certain purposes.

(b) No funds appropriated to or for the use of the Department of Defense may be used to pay, in connection with any contract awarded by the Department of Defense, a price differential for the purpose of relieving economic dislocations.

(Added Pub. L. 97–86, title IX, §913(a)(1), Dec. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 1123, §2392; renumbered §4653, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1862(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4277.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4653 was renumbered section 7653 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 2392 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
University of Kentucky
    UK Libraries
    Special Collections Research Center
Menu
    About
                    About ExploreUK
            How to
                    Activate your Researcher AccountRequest MaterialsVisit SCRCFind Copyright and Use Information
            Contact Us
            Researcher Account LoginSearch Home |
    Back to Search Results

Download
    JPEGof this page
    PDFof entire itemMechanization, Employment, and Output Per Man in Petroleum and Natural-Gas production by O.E. Kiessling [et al.]
Date
1939Creator
Kiessling, O. E. (Oscar Edward), 1901-.Language
EnglishCollection
Maryland Works Progress Administration PublicationsDescription
Other contributors: National Research Project on Reemployment Opportunities and Recent Changes in Industrial Techniques (U.S.); United States. Bureau of Mines. xxvii, 346, [3] p. : ill., maps ; 26 cm. Mineral technology and output per man studies ; rept. no. E-10. UK holds archival copy for ASERL Collaborative Federal Depository Program libraries. Call number FW 4.7:E-10.

You may come across language in UK Libraries Special Collections Research Center collections and online resources that you find harmful or offensive. SCRC collects materials from different cultures and time periods to preserve and make available the historical record. These materials document the time period when they were created and the view of their creator. As a result, some may demonstrate racist and offensive views that do not reflect the values of UK Libraries.

If you find description with problematic language that you think SCRC should review, please contact us at SCRC@uky.edu.

Item Details
Text

Rights
This digital resource may be freely searched and displayed in accordance with U. S. copyright laws.Publisher
Philadelphia, Pa. : Work Projects Administration, National Research Project in cooperation with Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of MinesFormat
booksPermalink
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/catalog/xt72z31nj52wXML Metadata
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt72z31nj52w/data/mets.xml

The text may or may not be an accurate representation of the original.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  2018 ERISA Section 4050 (Missing Participants) Mortality ... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# 2018 ERISA Section 4050 (Missing Participants) Mortality Table

This mortality table is used as part of the "missing participant annuity assumptions" as discussed in 29 CFR 4050. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

November 29, 2018

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
§ 162.347 What is the approval process for an amendment of a residential lease? ( a ) When we receive an amendment that meets the requirements of this subpart, we will notify the parties of the date we receive it. We have 30 days from receipt of the executed amendment, proof of required consents, and required documentation to approve or disapprove the amendment. Our determination whether to approve the amendment will be in writing and will state the basis for our approval or disapproval.
( b ) If we do not send a determination within 30 days from receipt of the required documents, the amendment is deemed approved to the extent consistent with Federal law. Unless the lease provides otherwise, provisions of the amendment that are inconsistent with Federal law will be severed and unenforceable; all other provisions of the amendment will remain in force.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2012-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 24, 2015



| | By: | /s/ Min Sok Randy Park                                       
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Min Sok Randy Park                                     
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.81 What laws are applicable to activities?

Federal and Tribal laws apply to activities under a TERA, unless otherwise specified in the TERA.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-99 

August 5, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4044(a) Allocation of Assets. Requirement of Following Statutory Allocation Provisions 

OPINION: 

 This is in reference to your request for a ruling on whether the beneficiary of a death benefit provided by the Plan,

whose entitlement to the death benefit arose prior to Plan termination but who has not yet been paid, shares in any way

in the income earned by the Plan's trust assets since the date of Plan termination. It is our opinion that such beneficiary

may not share in that income. 

The death benefit at issue here is a liability of the Plan which arose prior to its termination. Section 5.03 of the Plan

provides that the beneficiary is entitled to receive upon the death of the insured participant (1) the face value of the

insured participant's life insurance policy, and (2) a portion of the Auxiliary Investment Fund allocable to the insured

participant, determined as of the preceding anniversary of the Plan's effective date. Thus, the amount of benefits which

such beneficiary is entitled to receive under the terms of the Plan is fixed as of the date of the participant's death and is

not dependent on the investment experience of the Plan assets after the death of the insured participant. [*2] 

We are unable to find any provision in the Plan which would require the payment of interest on unpaid death

benefits. Furthermore, there is no provision in Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

(hereinafter "Act") which requires that interest be paid on an unpaid liability of the Plan which arose prior to termination.

Therefore, neither the Plan nor Title IV of the Act requires that the beneficiary of the unpaid death benefit shares in the

income of Plan assets earned after termination or that interest is to be paid on the unpaid death benefit. 

 This Corporation does not have any objection to the payment of interest in an appropriate case. However, in this

case § 14.02 of the Plan provides that the participants are vested upon termination in the entire Auxiliary Investment

Fund and any miscellaneous funds held by the Plan's trustees. Thus, any payment of interest from Plan assets on the

unpaid death benefit would necessarily diminish the amount of assets available to provide benefits to participants and

thereby reduce the amount of benefits to which participants are entitled under the terms of the Plan. Accordingly, in this

case we cannot approve the [*3] payment of interest from Plan assets on the unpaid death benefit. 

It is unfortunate that this problem has arisen. However, we note that the death occurred two months before the Plan

terminated and could have been paid then. Furthermore, this Corporation has not specifically prohibited its payment;

such payment would not have been a payment in accordance with the Plan's termination procedure prohibited by §

4041(a) of the Act during the pendancy of the termination notice. 

If you should have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact * * * the attorney assigned to this matter.

He can be reached by telephone at * * * 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel