Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Notices 10875 

1Copies of notices published in the Federal 

Register on the implementation of the Lacey Act 

(including directions on how to view comments 

received on them), guidance on complying with the 

Lacey Act, and information about how to register 

for stakeholder notification can be found on the 

APHIS Web site at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ 

plant_health/lacey_act/index.shtml. 

main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2008–0119 to submit or view comments 

and to view supporting and related 

materials available electronically. 

• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: 

Please send one copy of your comment 

to Docket No. APHIS–2008–0119, 

Regulatory Analysis and Development, 

PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700 

River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 

20737–1238. Please state that your 

comment refers to Docket No. APHIS– 

2008–0119. 

Reading Room: You may read any 

comments that we receive on this 

docket in our reading room. The reading 

room is located in room 1141 of the 

USDA South Building, 14th Street and 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC. Normal reading room 

hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except holidays. To be 

sure someone is there to help you, 

please call (202) 690–2817 before 

coming. 

Other Information: Additional 

information about APHIS and its 

programs is available on the Internet at 

http://www.aphis.usda.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

George Balady, Staff Officer, Quarantine 

Policy Analysis and Support, PPQ, 

APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 60, 

Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734– 

8295. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Lacey Act (16 U.S.C. 3371 et 

seq.), first enacted in 1900 and 

significantly amended in 1981, is the 

United States’ oldest wildlife protection 

statute. The Act combats trafficking in 

‘‘illegal’’ wildlife, fish, and plants. The 

Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 

2008, effective May 22, 2008, amended 

the Lacey Act by expanding its 

protections to a broader range of plants 

and plant products (Section 8204, 

Prevention of Illegal Logging Practices). 

As amended, the Lacey Act now makes 

it unlawful to import, export, transport, 

sell, receive, acquire, or purchase in 

interstate or foreign commerce any 

plant, with some limited exceptions, 

taken in violation of any Federal, State, 

Tribal, or foreign law that protects 

plants. The Lacey Act also now makes 

it unlawful to make or submit any false 

record, account, or label for, or any false 

identification of, any plant covered by 

the Act. 

In addition, Section 3 of the Lacey 

Act, as amended, made it unlawful, 

beginning December 15, 2008, to import 

certain plants and plant products 

without an import declaration. The 

declaration must contain, among other 

things, the scientific name of the plant, 

value of the importation, quantity of the 

plant, and name of the country from 

which the plant was harvested. 

Enforcement of the declaration 

requirement is currently being phased 

in.1

The Act also requires us to review the 

implementation of the declaration 

requirements, including the effect of 

certain exclusions from those 

requirements, and to provide public 

notice and opportunity for comment 

while conducting the review. 

Furthermore, after we have completed 

the review, we are required to submit a 

report to Congress detailing the results 

of that review. Specifically, the Act 

directs us to include in the report the 

following items: 

(A) An evaluation of— 

(i) The effectiveness of each type of 

information required under paragraphs (1) 

through (2) in assisting enforcement of this 

section; and 

(ii) The potential to harmonize each 

requirement imposed by paragraphs (1) and 

(2) with other applicable import regulations 

in existence as of the date of the report; 

(B) Recommendations for such legislation 

as the Secretary determines to be appropriate 

to assist in the identification of plants that 

are imported into the United States in 

violation of this section; and 

(C) An analysis of the effect of subsection 

(a) and this subsection on— 

(i) The cost of legal plant imports; and 

(ii) The extent and methodology of 

illegal logging practices and trafficking. 

Therefore, we are soliciting 

information from the public about the 

implementation of the import 

declaration requirements. Interested 

parties are invited to submit comments 

on the issues stated above and other 

pertinent issues related to the 

implementation and enforcement of the 

2008 Lacey Act amendments. 

Information received in response to this 

notice will be taken into account and 

included with our analysis of the 

implementation of the declaration 

requirements in the report made to 

Congress. Comments submitted in 

response to previous notices regarding 

implementation of the amended Lacey 

Act will also be taken into account and 

do not need to be resubmitted. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.; 7 CFR 

2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d). 

Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of 

February 2011. 

Kevin Shea, 

Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant 

Health Inspection Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4357 Filed 2–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–34–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension 

of Time Limit for the Preliminary 

Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 28, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

6, Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0176. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 28, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated 

the administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on chlorinated 

isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC) 

covering the period June 1, 2009, 

through May 31, 2010. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocations in Part, 75 FR 44224 

(July 28, 2010). The current deadline for 

the preliminary results of review is 

March 2, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. The Act further provides, 

however, that the Department may 

extend that 245-day period to 365 days 

if it determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
10876 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Notices 

1On September 30, 2009, the Department 

received a timely request to conduct an 

administrative review of the following 32 

companies: Abhinav Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.; 

American Scholar, Inc., and/or I–Scholar; 

Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co., Ltd.; Bafna Exports; 

Cello International Pvt. Ltd (M/S Cello Paper 

Products); Creative Divya; Corporate Stationery Pvt. 

Ltd.; D.D. International; Exmart International Pvt. 

Ltd.; Fatechand Mahendrakumar; FFI International; 

Freight India Logistics Pvt. Ltd.; International 

Greetings Pvt. Ltd.; Lodha Offset Limited; Magic 

International Pvt. Ltd.; Marigold ExIm Pvt. Ltd.; 

Marisa International; Navneet Publications (India) 

Ltd.; Paperwise Inc.; Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; 

Premier Exports; Riddhi Enterprises; SAB 

International; SAR Transport Systems; Seet Kamal 

International; Solitaire Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Eternity 

Int’l Freight, forwarder on behalf of Solitaire 

Logistics Pvt. Ltd.); Sonal Printers Pvt. Ltd.; Super 

Impex; Swati Growth Funds Ltd.; V & M; and Yash 

Laminates. 

results of the administrative review of 

chlorinated isos from the PRC within 

this time limit. Specifically, due to 

additional time needed to review the 

first supplemental questionnaire 

response and to issue further 

supplemental questionnaires, we find 

that additional time is needed to 

complete these preliminary results. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is extending the time period for 

completion of the preliminary results of 

this review from 245 days to 365 days; 

from March 2, 2011 until June 30, 2011. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 22, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4397 Filed 2–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–843] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 21, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary results of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

for certain lined paper products from 

India (CLPP). See Certain Lined Paper 

Products From India: Notice of 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

64988 (October 21, 2010) (Preliminary 

Results). This review covers 31 

manufacturers and exporters of the 

subject merchandise.1 On October 26, 

2009, petitioner timely withdrew its 

request for a review of Blue Bird (India) 

Limited (Blue Bird). Therefore, we are 

rescinding this review with respect to 

Blue Bird. 

As a result of our analysis of the 

comments received, these final results 

differ from the Preliminary Results. 

For our final results, we continue to 

find that Navneet did not make sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value (NV) (i.e., sales were made at de 

minimis dumping margins). We also 

find that U.S. sales have not been made 

below NV by Super Impex. In addition, 

based on the final results for Super 

Impex, we have determined that the 29 

remaining non-selected companies will 

receive the non-selected respondent rate 

from the previous review. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 28, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Moore (Navneet) and Cindy 

Robinson (Super Impex), AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3692, (202) 482– 

3797, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 29, 2010, the Department 

selected Navneet and Super Impex as 

companies to be individually examined 

in this administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CLPP from 

India. See Memorandum to Melissa 

Skinner, Director, Office 3 Through 

James Terpstra, Program Manager, 

Office 3 from Stephanie Moore, Case 

Analyst titled ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India: Selection of 

Respondents for Individual Review’’ 

(Respondent Selection Memo), dated 

January 29, 2010. 

As stated in the Preliminary Results, 

on October 26, 2009, petitioner timely 

withdrew its request for a review of 

Blue Bird. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind 

an administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the parties that requested a 

review withdraw the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

review. The instant review was initiated 

on October 26, 2009. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, 74 FR 54956 

(October 26, 2009) (Initiation Notice). 

The petitioner’s withdrawal of request 

for a review of Blue Bird falls within the 

90-day deadline for rescission by the 

Department, and no other party 

requested an administrative review of 

this particular respondent. Therefore, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

and consistent with our practice, we are 

rescinding this review with respect to 

Blue Bird. See, e.g., Lightweight 

Thermal Paper from Germany: Notice of 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 11135 

(March 10, 2010). 

On October 21, 2010, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results. On 

October 25, 2010, petitioner submitted 

additional factual information obtained 

from the Web site http:// 

www.cellopapers.com/ruled-plainpapers.html, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.301(b)(2). 

Comments From Interested Parties 

We invited parties to comment on our 

Preliminary Results. Case briefs were 

filed on November 18, 2010, by Super 

Impex and on November 23, 2010, by 

petitioner and Navneet. On December 

13 and 14, 2010, Super Impex and 

petitioner, respectively, filed rebuttal 

briefs. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of this order includes 

certain lined paper products, typically 

school supplies (for purposes of this 

scope definition, the actual use of or 

labeling these products as school 

supplies or non-school supplies is not a 

defining characteristic) composed of or 

including paper that incorporates 

straight horizontal and/or vertical lines 

on ten or more paper sheets (there shall 

be no minimum page requirement for 

loose leaf filler paper) including but not 

limited to such products as single- and 

multi-subject notebooks, composition 

books, wireless notebooks, loose leaf or 

glued filler paper, graph paper, and 

laboratory notebooks, and with the 

smaller dimension of the paper 

measuring 6 inches to 15 inches 

(inclusive) and the larger dimension of 

the paper measuring 8-3/4 inches to 15 

inches (inclusive). Page dimensions are 

measured size (not advertised, stated, or 

‘‘tear-out’’ size), and are measured as 

they appear in the product (i.e., stitched 

and folded pages in a notebook are 

measured by the size of the page as it 

appears in the notebook page, not the 

size of the unfolded paper). However, 

for measurement purposes, pages with 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES