alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Palma, Elizabeth

From: Palma, Elizabeth

Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 11:35 AM

To: Palma, Elizabeth

Subject: State / Local / Tribal Exceptional Events Li stening Session in Advance of Anticipated Rule

Revisions - Wednesday, August 28

Attachments: Listening Session Questions for Consideration_082013.docx

Thank you for registering for EPA's Exceptional Events Listening Session in Advance of Anticipated Rule Revisions

scheduled for Wednesday, August 28, 2013, from 2:00

‐ 4:00 PM eastern time on conference line 866

‐ 299

‐ 3188 and

Conference Code 919

‐ 541

‐ 2802

. Because we welcome co

‐ regulator participation in both of our listening sessions, state,

local, and tribal agencies who registered without specifying whether they wanted to participate in the Monday, August

26 (public) or Wednesday, August 28 (state/local/tribal

– only) listening session will receive email invitations for both

dates. Agencies identifying the Monday, August 26 session are also copied on this email.

During our discussion on Wednesday, EPA will provide a brief overview of our anticipated schedule for Exceptional

Events Rule revisions and the development of guidance for wildfire

‐ related events that can affect ozone concentrations,

but our primary objective in hosting this discussion is for interested parties to provide feedback related to the attached

questions and for the EPA to consider your perspectives as we undertake revisions to the 2007 Exceptional Events Rule.

We intend to present each question and then call first upon those who have indicated their desire to provide feedback.

We plan to follow this process for each question.

The EPA does not plan to formally respond to comments received during this process. We are not seeking consensus nor

are we committing to include proposed rule elements based on the input we receive. We are hosting this listening

session by conference call to ensure we capture and understand any comments or concerns and make sure we do not

overlook key elements for rule revision.

As we move forward with a notice and comment rulemaking process, there will be an opportunity for all interested

parties, including those that commented during the 2012 public comment period, to raise any issues or concerns. EPA,

air agencies, and interested parties should use EPA’s Interim Exceptional Events Implementation Guidance, signed May

10, 2013, as we undertake rule revisions because it is consistent with the EER and the guidance already provided in the

preamble to the rule. This guidance is currently available on EPA's Exceptional Events website at

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/a nalysis/exevents.htm

.

We look forward to your participation during Wednesday’s discussion.

Beth W. Palma

USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

109 TW Alexander Drive (C539

‐ 04)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

palma.elizabeth@epa.gov

919.541.5432
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 021 3 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 207 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12477 and #12478]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oregon (FEMA-1956-DR), dated 02/17/2011. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storm, Flooding, Mudslides, Landslides, and Debris Flows. *Incident Period:*
                         01/13/2011 through 01/21/2011. *Effective Date:*
                         02/17/2011. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/18/2011. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/17/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 02/17/2011, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Clackamas, Clatsop, Crook, Douglas, Lincoln, Tillamook. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12477B and for economic injury is 12478B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2011-4426 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I,
Norman M. Blashka, EVP and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




                                           /s/
                                           Norman M. Blashka
                                           EVP and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (principal financial and
                                           accounting officer)


                                           January 24, 2003
§ 162.420 How much monetary compensation must be paid under a business lease of tribal land? ( a ) A business lease of tribal land may allow for any payment amount negotiated by the tribe, and we will defer to the tribe and not require a valuation if the tribe submits a tribal authorization expressly stating that it: ( 1 ) Has negotiated compensation satisfactory to the tribe;
( 2 ) Waives valuation; and
( 3 ) Has determined that accepting such negotiated compensation and waiving valuation is in its best interest.
( b ) The tribe may request, in writing, that we determine fair market rental, in which case we will use a valuation in accordance with § 162.422. After providing the tribe with the fair market rental, we will defer to a tribe's decision to allow for any payment amount negotiated by the tribe.
( c ) If the conditions in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section are not met, we will require that the lease provide for fair market rental based on a valuation in accordance with § 162.422.
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Justin Alexander Larkins

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2
§ 256.13 How do I apply for the Housing Improvement Program? ( a ) First, obtain an application, BIA Form 6407, from your servicing housing office or the BIA Web site.
( b ) Second, complete and sign BIA Form 6407.
( c ) Third, submit your completed and signed application to your servicing housing office.
( d ) Fourth, furnish to the servicing housing office documentation proving your tribal membership. Examples of acceptable documentation include a copy of your Certificate of Degree of Indian Blood (CDIB) or a copy of your tribal membership card.
( e ) Fifth, provide proof of income from all permanent members of your household. ( 1 ) Submit signed copies of current 1040 tax returns from all permanent members of the household, including W-2s and all other attachments. Submit the Social Security number of the applicant only.
( 2 ) Provide proof of all other income from all permanent members of the household. This includes unearned income such as Social Security, general assistance, retirement, and unemployment benefits.
( 3 ) If you or other household members did not file a tax return, submit a signed notarized statement explaining why you did not.
( f ) Sixth, furnish a copy of your annual trust income statement for your Individual Indian Money (IIM) account from your home agency. If you do not have an IIM account, furnish a statement from your home agency to that effect.
( g ) Seventh, provide proof of ownership of the residence and land or potential leasehold interest: ( 1 ) For fee property, provide a copy of a fully executed deed, which is available at your local county or parish court house;
( 2 ) For trust property, provide certification of ownership from your home agency;
( 3 ) For tribally owned land, provide a copy of a properly executed tribal assignment, certified by the tribe;
( 4 ) For multi-owner property, provide a copy of a properly executed lease;
( 5 ) For a potential lease, provide proof of ability to acquire an undivided leasehold (that is, you will be the only lessee) for a minimum of 25 years from the date of service; or
( 6 ) For down-payment assistance, provide a description and the location of the house to be purchased, verification of your intent to purchase, and the sale price of the house.
( h ) Eighth, if you seek down payment assistance, provide a letter from the institution where you have applied for mortgage financing that specifies: ( 1 ) The down payment amount; and
( 2 ) The closing costs required for you to qualify for the loan.
### §8047. Legislative Assistant to the Commandant

There is in the Marine Corps a Legislative Assistant to the Commandant.

(Added Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title V, §504(d)(3)(A), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2532, §5047; amended Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(y), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2104; renumbered §8047, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5047 of this title as this section.

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 struck out second sentence which read as follows: "An officer assigned to that position shall be in a grade above colonel."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 273.202 Does this part include an information collection?

The collections of information in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned OMB Control Number 1076-0193. Responses is required to obtain a benefit. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
§ 21.11 Standard organization of the Code of Federal Regulations. The standard organization consists of the following structural units: ( a ) Titles, which are numbered consecutively in Arabic throughout the Code;
( b ) Subtitles, which are lettered consecutively in capitals throughout the title;
( c ) Chapters, which are numbered consecutively in Roman capitals throughout each title;
( d ) Subchapters, which are lettered consecutively in capitals throughout the chapter;
( e ) Parts, which are numbered in Arabic throughout each title;
( f ) Subparts, which are lettered in capitals;
( g ) Sections, which are numbered in Arabic throughout each part. A section number includes the number of the part followed by a period and the number of the section. For example, the section number for section 15 of part 21 is “§ 21.15”; and
( h ) Paragraphs, which are designated as follows:
level 1 (a), (b), (c), etc. level 2 (1), (2), (3), etc. level 3 (i), (ii), (iii), etc. level 4 (A), (B), (C), etc. level 5 (*1*), (*2*), (*3*), etc. level 6 (*i*), (*ii*), (*iii*), etc.
[54 FR 9682, Mar. 7, 1989; 54 FR 23343, May 31, 1989]
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1

for the Western District of Arkansas.

-1-

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1040

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 *

Appeal from the United States

v. *

District Court of the

 *

Western District of Arkansas.

Chester Sanders, III, *

 * 

[UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: August 7, 1997

 Filed: August 25,

1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Chester Sanders, III appeals the 70-month sentence

imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to 1

aiding and abetting an armed bank robbery, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 and 2. For reversal, Sanders argues
-2-

that the court clearly erred when it denied him an

acceptance-of-responsibility reduction.
-3-

“Sentencing Guideline § 3E1.1 allows the district

court to reduce the offense level of a defendant who

#clearly demonstrates acceptance of responsibility for his

offense.&” United States v. Evans, 51 F.3d 764, 766 (8th

Cir. 1995) (quoting U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual §

3E1.1(a) (1995)). The defendant carries the burden of

establishing acceptance of responsibility, see United

States v. Morales, 923 F.2d 621, 628 (8th Cir. 1991), and

the court&s decision to deny such a reduction is afforded

great deference and will not be disturbed unless it is

clearly erroneous, see Evans, 51 F.3d at 766.

We conclude the district court did not clearly err in

denying Sanders the reduction based, among other things,

on Sanders&s failure to plead guilty until the morning of

trial when the jury panel was present. See USSG § 3E1.1,

comment. (n.1); United States v. Yell, 18 F.3d 581, 583-

84 (8th Cir. 1994). Sanders&s reliance on United States

v. Knight, 905 F.2d 189 (8th Cir. 1990), is misplaced, as

the district court&s decision in that case did not involve

the timeliness of the defendant&s guilty plea.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH

CIRCUIT.
# C_2006224EN.01005304.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/53

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 — URS Nederland v Commission

(Case T-329/02) (1)

1

(2006/C 224/112)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Third Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 323, 21.12.2002.

1

---
#### § 273.209 How does a State, public school district, or an Indian corporation request an appeal?

The State, public school district, or an Indian corporation may request an appeal by filing an appeal with the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. 7101-7109, no later than 90 calendar days after the date the contractor receives the decision.
#### § 170.615 Can a Tribe receive advance payments for non-construction activities under the TTP?

Yes. A Tribe must receive advance payments for non-construction activities under 25 U.S.C. 450*l* for self-determination contracts on a quarterly, semiannual, lump-sum, or other basis proposed by a Tribe and authorized by law.
#### Austin et al. *v.*Hiner.

[No. 12,482.

Filed November 24, 1925.]

From Industrial Board of Indiana.

Proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act between Wallace Austin and another and Frank Hiner. From the award made, the former appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*Joseph W. Hutchinson*and *James M. Berryhill,*for appellants.

*Robert I. Marsh*and *George O. Cowan,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Award affirmed.
# C_2006294EN.01005503.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/55

---

Action brought on 25 September 2006 — Lego Juris v OHIM — Mega Brands (Lego brick)

(Case T-270/06)

(2006/C 294/114)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Lego Juris A/S (Billund, Denmark) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck and T. Dolde, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mega Brands Inc. (Montreal, Canada)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 July 2006 in case No R 856/2004-G; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 July 2006 in case No R 856/2004-G; and

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The figurative mark ‘LEGO brick’ for products in class 28 claiming the ‘colour red’ — Community Trade mark No 107 029

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Mega Brands Inc.

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant advances a single plea in law in support of its application. Precisely, the applicant contends that the contested decision violates Article 7(1)(e)(ii) CTMR of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 in so far as it allegedly misinterprets the said provision as well as its rationale and, in addition, to the extent that it applies it to something that is not the subject of the trade mark protection granted by the registration at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2012-2

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

I, Christopher J. Abate, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-2 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on
my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Corelogic Tax Services, LLC, Assurant, Inc., Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

Date: March 30, 2018



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Christopher J. Abate
|Signature               

Chairman of the Board and President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)