alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Robert Chmiel, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of Consolidated Energy, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date:  December 5, 2006 /s/ Robert Chmiel Robert Chmiel Interim Chief Financial Officer
STATE OF MICIIIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY LANSING

# DE~ RICK SNYDER

GOVERNOR September 5, 2012

VIA U.S. MAILAND ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION
Docket ID. EPA-R05-0AR-2010-0954 Ms. Pamela Blakley, Chief Control Strategies Section Air Programs Branch (AR-18J) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 77 WestJackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 Dear Ms. Blakley, DAN WYANT DIRECTOR

SUBJECT: Approval and Promulgation ofAir Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan; Regional Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Regional Haze; Proposed Rule The U.S. Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to mandate best available retrofit technology (BART) fortwo sources in Michigan to meet Regional Haze visibility goals. This proposed FIP accompanies a proposed limited disapproval ofMichigan's Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal due to a determination that Michigan's BART analyses are deficientfor St. Mary's Cement in Charlevoix and New Page Paper in Escanaba. The Section 169visibility provision ofthe federal Clean AirAct clearly places the regulatory responsibilities for visibility and the analysis of BARTfor sources on states. Additionally, the August21, 2012 decision ofthe U.S. Court ofAppeals, D.C. Circuit on the Cross StateAir Pollution Rule emphasizes that a FIP-first process is not in accordance with the Act. Section 110(c)(1) ofthe Act authorizes the EPAto promulgate a FIP within two years after making a finding that the state's submittal does notsatisfy the minimum criteria. However, in proposing a FIP simultaneouslywith a proposed disapproval, the EPA is circumventing the process laid out in the Act by not giving the state the opportunityto correctthe identified deficiencies in Michigan's BART SIP revision. The Air Quality Division ofthe Michigan Departmentof Environmental Quality (MDEQ) acknowledges that differences overappropriate technology applications have led to the proposal for limited disapproval, but strongly objects to this FIP-firstapproach, which usurps the state's prerogative to address the deficiencies laid out in the limited disapproval in its SIP.

CONSTITUTION HALL• 525WESTALLEGAN STREET• P.O. BOX30473•LANSING, MICHIGAN48909-7973 www.mfchigan.gov/deq • (800)662-9278Ms. Pamela Blakley Page 2 September 5, 2012

Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact me at the number listed below.

# ·~;j;~£~/- Mr. G. Vinson Hellwig / Air Quality Division 517-373-7069 Cc. Mr. Charles Hatten, EPA, Region 5 Mr. Jim Sygo, MDEQ Mr. Robert Irvine, MDEQ
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Elgar Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Budano, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
| /s/ Joseph  Budano       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Joseph  Budano           |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10911-10912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4381]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Minority Biomedical 
Research Support Applications.
    Date: March 24, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference 
Call.)
    Contact Person: Rebecca H. Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, 
Room 3AN18C, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-2771. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfb5b0b7b1acb0b1adb79fb1b6b8b2acf1b1b6b7f1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0aaafa8aeb3afaeb2a880aea9a7adb3eeaea9a8eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 10912]]


    Dated: February 22, 2011.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4381 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 30.106 How will the Secretary provide for the inclusion of all students in assessments? The Secretary will provide assessment instruments that allow for: ( a ) The participation of all students, generally;
( b ) The participation of students with disabilities, as detailed in §§ 30.107 and 30.108; and
( c ) The participation of English learners, as detailed in § 30.109.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Guthrie, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ David Guthrie
David Guthrie, Principal Executive Officer

Date: August 22, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 55 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 55

  Providing a sense of the House of Representatives that at least one-
third of the budget surplus over the next 10 years should be dedicated 
         to paying down the national debt of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

    Mr. Upton (for himself and Mr. LaHood) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing a sense of the House of Representatives that at least one-
third of the budget surplus over the next 10 years should be dedicated 
         to paying down the national debt of the United States.

Whereas the current national debt of the United States is $5.6 trillion;
Whereas in 1997 the Government spent over 15 percent of its budget to pay 
        interest on the national debt;
Whereas net interest payments amounted to $243 billion last year;
Whereas interest payments on the national debt for the next five years are 
        projected to be $977 billion;
Whereas debt held by the public in 1998 was 44 percent of Gross Domestic 
        Product;
Whereas a smaller debt would make more credit available for private sector 
        investment and other productive investments that would help future 
        economic growth; and
Whereas a smaller debt would also result in lower interest rates and would 
        increase the level of national savings: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) in addition to other policy decisions by the Congress, 
        lowering the national debt must be a central element in the 
        debate over the use of projected budget surpluses; and
            (2) at least one-third of the projected budget surpluses 
        over the next 10 years should be dedicated to paying down the 
        national debt of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
### [§681. Renumbered §12313]
### §8413. Aviation cadets: appointment as reserve officers

(a) An aviation cadet who fulfills the requirements of section 2003 of this title may be appointed an ensign in the Navy Reserve or a second lieutenant in the Marine Corps Reserve and designated a naval aviator.

(b) Aviation cadets who complete their training at approximately the same time are considered for all purposes to have begun their commissioned service on the same date, and the decision of the Secretary of the Navy in this regard is conclusive.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 427, §6913; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §513(20), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2932; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §515(b)(1)(O), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3233; renumbered §8413, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6913(a) | 34 U.S.C. 850f. | Aug. 4, 1942, ch. 547, §7, 56 Stat. 738. |
| 6913(b) | 34 U.S.C. 850g. | Aug. 4, 1942, ch. 547, §8, 56 Stat. 738. |

In subsection (a) the proviso is omitted as unnecessary. Section 1 of the Act of April 28, 1950, ch. 120, 64 Stat. 90, terminated service credit for lump-sum payments granted under §12 of the Act of August 4, 1942, ch. 547, 56 Stat. 738, and thereby removed the only consequences of the proviso. The words "section 6023(b) of this title" are substituted for the words "law for designation or appointment as naval aviators" to provide specific reference to those requirements. The words "and designated a naval aviator" are added for clarity and to authorize specifically the designation, which is implied in 34 U.S.C. 850f.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6913 of this title as this section.

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "Navy Reserve" for "Naval Reserve".

1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "section 2003" for "section 6023(b)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
§ 47.9 What are the minimum requirements for the local educational financial plan? ( a ) The local educational financial plan must include: ( 1 ) Separate funds for each group receiving a discrete program of services is to be provided, including each program funded through the Indian School Equalization Program;
( 2 ) A budget showing the costs projected for each program; and
( 3 ) A certification provision meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The certification required by paragraph (a)(3) of this section must provide for: ( 1 ) Certification by the chairman of the school board that the plan has been ratified in an action of record by the board; and
( 2 ) Certification by the Education Line Officer that he or she has approved the plan as shown in an action overturning the school board's rejection or amendment of the plan.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1174

_____________________________

JACQUELINE MICHELLE LONG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Devin Collier, Judge.

May 10, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### § 32.3 Mission statement.

Recognizing the special rights of Indian Tribes and Alaska Native entities and the unique government-to-government relationship of Indian Tribes and Alaska Native villages with the Federal Government as affirmed by the United States Constitution, U.S. Supreme Court decisions, treaties, Federal statutes, and Executive Orders, and as set out in the Congressional declaration in sections 2 and 3 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93-638; 88 Stat. 2203; 25 U.S.C. 450 and 450a), it is the responsibility and goal of the Federal government to provide comprehensive education programs and services for Indians and Alaska Natives. As acknowledged in section 5 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-608; 92 Stat. 3069; 25 U.S.C. 1901), in the Federal Government's protection and preservation of Indian Tribes and Alaska Native villages and their resources, there is no resource more vital to such Tribes and villages than their young people and the Federal Government has a direct interest, as trustee, in protecting Indian and Alaska Native children, including their education. The mission of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Indian Education Programs, is to provide quality education opportunities from early childhood through life in accordance with the Tribes' needs for cultural and economic well-being in keeping with the wide diversity of Indian Tribes and Alaska Native villages as distinct cultural and governmental entities. The Bureau shall manifest consideration of the whole person, taking into account the spiritual, mental, physical and cultural aspects of the person within family and Tribal or Alaska Native village contexts.
CERTIFICATIONS  I, Scott Davis, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Stellar Biotechnologies Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 15, 2013   By: /s/  "Scott Davis"  Scott Davis Chief Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER II—DECLARATIONS PROVIDING UNITED STATES WITH NEW INFORMATION CONCERNING RECOVERY OF ASSETS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WIGENS ALEXANDRE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-703

[October 28, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Dina Keever-Agrama, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

21MH000221ANB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jacqueline I. 

Kurland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, LEVINE, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 170.128 What activities are eligible for TTP-S funds? ( a ) TTP-S funds made available under 23 U.S.C. 202(e) may be used for projects and activities that improve safety in one or more of the following categories: ( 1 ) Safety Plans and Planning activities; and
( 2 ) Other eligible activities as described in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4)
( b ) Eligible activities for each of the categories listed in paragraph (a) of this section will be included in the annual Notice of Funding Opportunity. An eligibility determination for other proposed activities must be requested from BIA or FHWA under § 170.113.