alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006224EN.01003306.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/33

---

Order of the President of the Court of 2 June 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-89/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 224/72)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 08.04.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001061892
<NAME> RIVER HOLDING CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>                            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                          
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1998         
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1998         
<CASH>                                           1,306         
<SECURITIES>                                         0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,354         
<ALLOWANCES>                                       391         
<INVENTORY>                                     17,412         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,941         
<PP&E>                                          47,845         
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0         
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 259,118         
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,939         
<BONDS>                                        152,000         
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,648         
<PREFERRED>                                          0         
<COMMON>                                        63,125         
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,594)         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,118         
<SALES>                                         44,562         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0         
<CGS>                                           24,794         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,683         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,708)         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,955)         
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,299)         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,946)         
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0         
<CHANGES>                                            0         
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,946)         
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0         
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0         
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DAVID BLAKE JOHNSTON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1860

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

 )

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 30, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Brian A. Iten, Judge.

Ronald J. Kurpiers, II of Kurpiers Law Firm, 

PA, Tampa, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

MORRIS, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
# C_2006294EN.01006501.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/65

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 October 2006 — Combescot v Commission

(Case F-114/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Appeal - Time-limits - Implied rejection - Explicit refusal, notified at a later stage, to reopen the period for lodging an appeal - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/128)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Philippe Combescot (Popayán, Colombia) (represented by: A. Maritati and V. Messa, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and M. Velardo, Agents, assisted by S. Corongiu, lawyer)

Defendant:

:

Re:

First, annulment of the Commission's decision to reassign the applicant, in the interests of the service, from the Commission's delegation in Guatemala to its Brussels headquarters under the 2003 rotation scheme and, secondly, an application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 28.1.2006, p. 22 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-422/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005)

1

---
### Landslides in the vicinity of the Fort Randall Reservoir, South Dakota

By: Christopher F. Erskine

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp675

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Landslides in the vicinity of the Fort Randall Reservoir, South Dakota(1965)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 162.340 What is the approval process for a residential lease? ( a ) Before we approve a residential lease, we must determine that the lease is in the best interest of the Indian landowners. In making that determination, we will: ( 1 ) Review the lease and supporting documents;
( 2 ) Ensure compliance with applicable laws and ordinances;
( 3 ) If the lease is being approved under 25 U.S.C. 415, assure ourselves that adequate consideration has been given to the factors in 25 U.S.C. 415(a); and
( 4 ) Require any lease modifications or mitigation measures necessary to satisfy any requirements including any other Federal or tribal land use requirements.
( b ) Upon receiving a residential lease package, we will promptly notify the parties whether the package is or is not complete. A complete package includes all the information and supporting documents required under this subpart, including but not limited to, NEPA review documentation and valuation documentation, where applicable. ( 1 ) If the residential lease package is not complete, our letter will identify the missing information or documents required for a complete package. If we do not respond to the submission of a residential lease package, the parties may take action under § 162.363.
( 2 ) If the residential lease package is complete, we will notify the parties of the date of receipt. Within 30 days of the receipt date, we will approve or disapprove the lease or return the package for revision.
( c ) If we do not meet the deadlines in this section, then the parties may take action under § 162.363.
( d ) We will provide any lease approval or disapproval and the basis for the determination, along with notification of any appeal rights under part 2 of this chapter, in writing to the parties to the lease.
( e ) Any residential lease issued under the authority of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act, 25 U.S.C 4211(a), whether on tribal land or on individually owned Indian land, must be approved by us and by the affected tribe.
( f ) We will provide approved residential leases on tribal land to the lessee and provide a copy to the tribe. We will provide approved residential leases on individually owned Indian land to the lessee, and make copies available to the Indian landowners upon written request.
The President SEP 0 2C22 

The White House 

Washington, D.C. 20500 

Dear Mr. President: 

We are pleased to submit the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's fiscal year (FY)

actuarial evaluation of the expected operations and status of the PBGC funds as required by 

Section 4008 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. This report completes our 

Annual Report for FY

Sincerely, 

MARTIN J. WALSH 

Secretary of Labor 

Chair of the Board 

GORDON HARTOGENSIS 

Director 

Enclosure 
 Pension Benefit 

 Guaranty Corporation 

The Honorable D. Harris 

President of the Senate 

Washington, D.C. 20510 

Dear Madam President: 

We are pleased to submit the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's fiscal year (FY)

actuarial evaluation of the expected operations and status of the PBGC funds as required by 

Section 4008 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. This report completes our 

Annual Report for FY

Sincerely, 

MARTIN J. WALSH 

Secretary of Labor 

Chair of the Board 

GORDON HARTOGENSIS 

Director 

Enclosure 
 Benefit 

 Corporation 

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi 

Speaker the U.S. House Representatives 0 1 2022 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Madam Speaker: 

We are pleased to submit the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's fiscal year (FY)

actuarial evaluation of the expected operations and status of the PBGC funds as required by 

Section 4008 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. This report completes our 

Annual Report for F Y

Sincerely, 

MARTI N J. WALS H 

Secretary of Labor 

Chair of the Board 

GORDON HARTOGENSIS 

Director 

Enclosure 
Guaranty Corporation 

The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy

President pro tempore of the Senate 

Washington, D.C. 20510 

Dear Mr. President: 

We are pleased to submit the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's fiscal year (FY) 2021 

actuarial evaluation of the expected operations and status of the PBGC funds as required by 

Section 4008 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. This report completes our 

Annual Report for FY

Sincerely, 

MARTIN J. WALSH 

Secretary of Labor 

Chair of the Board 

Director 

Enclosure
# CA2006311EN.01000101.xml

| 19.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 311/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 311/1

---

Publication of a vacancy for the post of audiovisual administrator/adviser

(Ref. CONS/AD/046)

(2006/C 311 A/01)

The General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union is seeking to fill a vacant post in Unit 1 Press Office of its Directorate-General F (Press-Communication-Protocol). The successful candidate will be offered a contract as a temporary staff member, at grade AD10, for a period of four years (with a six-month probationary period), which may be renewed only once for a maximum of two years.

Further information on the vacant post and the application procedure can be obtained by consulting the notice of vacancy on the Council's website at:

http://www.consilium.europa.eu/concours

The deadline for submitting applications is 19 January 2007, the postmark serving as proof.

---
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




As of May 23, 2008




Mr. Mark Feldman


Executive Vice President & General Counsel


GAME SHOW NETWORK


2150 Colorado Avenue


Santa Monica, CA 90404



	 	 	 
	Re:

	 	World Poker Tour Series VII Option Pickup Extension

Amendment #3






Dear Mr. Feldman:



Pursuant to the request of our CEO & President, Steve Lipscomb, I am happy to amend our television
license agreement dated April 2, 2007 to reflect a one-time extension of our option pickup date
solely for Season VII of the World Poker Tour Series until June 7, 2008 (formerly May 24, 2008).



Except as otherwise herein expressly amended the Agreement is in all other aspects hereby ratified
and confirmed. Please acknowledge your acceptance of the foregoing by signing in the space
provided below.



Sincerely,



WPT ENTERPRISES, INC.



By: /s/ Adam Pliska

Adam Pliska

Title: General Counsel




ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



GAMESHOW NETWORK, L.L.C.



By: /s/ Mark Feldman

Its: Executive Vice President & General Counsel
# C_2006224EN.01000202.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-119/04) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Judgment of the Court establishing failure - Non-compliance - Article 228 EC - Financial penalties - Recognition of acquired rights of former foreign-language assistants)

(2006/C 224/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Traversa and L. Pignataro, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I. M. Braguglia, Agent, and M. Fiorilli, Avvocato)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 228 EC — Failure to comply with the judgment of 26 June 2001 in Case C-212/99 — Infringement of Article 48 EC (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) — Recognition of the acquired rights of former foreign-language assistants — Application for the imposition of a penalty payment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The Court declares that by not ensuring, at the date of expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion, recognition of the rights acquired by former assistants who have become associates and linguistic experts, even though such recognition is guaranteed to all national workers, the Italian Republic has failed to take all the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 26 June 2001 in Case C-212/99 Commission v Italy and has therefore failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 228 EC. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Court declares that by not ensuring, at the date of expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion, recognition of the rights acquired by former assistants who have become associates and linguistic experts, even though such recognition is guaranteed to all national workers, the Italian Republic has failed to take all the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 26 June 2001 in Case C-212/99 Commission v Italy and has therefore failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 228 EC.

Commission

Italy

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

1

---
# C_2006207EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 August 2006

(2006/C 207/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2808 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4609 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67450 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2493 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5774 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,47 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0425 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5763 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,209 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,42 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9510 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5292 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,738 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8887 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6773 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4206 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9612 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9874 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0146 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 230,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1389 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1980 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3220 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 645,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7108 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,366 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,068 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2808

JPY

Japanese yen

149,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4609

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67450

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2493

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5774

ISK

Iceland króna

89,47

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0425

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5763

CZK

Czech koruna

28,209

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,42

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9510

RON

Romanian leu

3,5292

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,738

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8887

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6773

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4206

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9612

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9874

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0146

KRW

South Korean won

1 230,98

ZAR

South African rand

9,1389

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1980

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3220

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 645,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7108

PHP

Philippine peso

65,366

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2750

THB

Thai baht

48,068

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, James A. Israel, President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., certify:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2012 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 
| Date:   January 8, 2014 | Deere   Credit Services, Inc. |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                         |                               |
|                         |                               |
|                         |                               |
|                         | By                                 | */s/   James A. Israel* |   |
|                         |                               | James A. Israel |
|                         |                               | President |

 

----
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-214 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF 

WEST AFRICAN STATES 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Abuja 

January 24 and February 14, 2003 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF 

WEST AFRICAN STATES 

Defense 

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Abuja January 24 and February 14, 2003; 

 Entered into force February 14, 2003.
### [§2302e. Renumbered §4004]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7922

SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X, a/k/a Michael Wayne

Montgomery,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD BUNDRICK, Inmate Relations Coordinator

at the Maximum Security Unit; SOUTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-741-6-3AK)

Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: May 30, 1996

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. X v. Bundrick,

No. CA-95-741-6-3AK (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 241.1 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to regulate all fishing within the Annette Islands Reserve and to regulate Indian and other native commercial fishing in the Karluk Indian Reservation, but they shall not be construed to limit any rights of Indians or other natives of Alaska not specifically covered hereby.