alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 159

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 381

[Report No. 106–473]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 80) making

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 16), 1999

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

80) making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J.

4 Res. 80) making further continuing appropriations for the

5 fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes. The joint resolu6 tion shall be considered as read for amendment. The pre7 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the joint
2

HRES 381 RH

1 resolution to final passage without intervening motion ex2 cept: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled

3 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

4 Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to re5 commit.

House Calendar No. 159

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 381

[Report No. 106–473]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 80) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for otherpurposes.

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 16), 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### §1187. Duties and reporting requirements of debtors

(a) Filing Requirements.—Upon electing to be a debtor under this subchapter, the debtor shall file the documents required by subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 1116(1) of this title.

(b) Other Applicable Provisions.—A debtor, in addition to the duties provided in this title and as otherwise required by law, shall comply with the requirements of section 308 and paragraphs (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7) of section 1116 of this title.

(c) Separate Disclosure Statement Exemption.—If the court orders under section 1181(b) of this title that section 1125 of this title applies, section 1125(f) of this title shall apply.

(Added Pub. L. 116–54, §2(a), Aug. 23, 2019, 133 Stat. 1081.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Aug. 23, 2019, see section 5 of Pub. L. 116–54, set out as an Effective Date of 2019 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1 to 2008 10-Q

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of Convergys Corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2008 (the Report), I, David F. Dougherty, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David F. Dougherty 
|David F. Dougherty     
|Chief Executive Officer

May 7, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Convergys Corporation and will be retained by Convergys Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-86 

June 12, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041 Termination by Plan Administrator

4082(a) Effective Date; Special Rules. Effective Date of Title IV 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letters concerning the termination of the above-captioned pension plan. You stated that

* * * and * * * reached agreement on a new contract in August 1974, that the terms of the agreement were embodied in

a Memorandum of Understanding executed on or about August 12, 1974, that the formal contract was executed shortly

thereafter, and that the contract was effective as of may 21, 1974. Pursuant to the terms of the contract, the company's

existing tax qualified defined benefit Pension plan was to be terminated on April 1, 1975 and the assets of the plan

distributed to the participants in * * * accordance with the terms of the plan. The company would then adopt the

provisions of the * * * Pension Fund (a multi-employer plan) and commence contributions to that plan. You stated in

a phone conversation with * * * of this office on June 4, 1975 that the original plan was indeed being * * * terminated

and assets were to be distributed to participants, and that the plan was not being merged into the * * * plan. You

questioned whether, given the fact that [*2] the termination of the first plan was required under the terms of a collective

bargaining agreement entered into prior to the enactment of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the

"Act"), the plan termination would be be subject to the provisions of sections 4041 and 4062 of the Act. 

It appears from the information you have provided us that the first plan is a covered plan under section 4021 of the

Act. Therefore, its termination is subject to the provisions of section 4041 and, since it is a portenactment termination,

section 4062. This is so despite the fact that the termination results from a contract entered into prior to the enactment

of the Act. Pursuant to section 4082(a), the provisions of Title IV take effect on the date of enactment of the Act. There

is no exception to this rule with respect to terminations which were planned or contractually agreed to prior to that date.

Moreover, Title IV applies to the termination even though the employer is adopting a new pension plan. Thus, all

terminations of covered plans on or after September 2, 1974 are subject to Title IV of the Act. 

Therefore, pursuant to section 4041, the plan administrator must file a [*3] notice of proposed termination with this

Corporation, and the assets of the plan may not be distributed pursuant to the plan termination procedure until this

Corporation issues the plan administrator a notice of sufficiency. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044 Retirement Assumptions 
-  Retirement Rate Category Tables 2022 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Retirement Rate Category Tables 2022

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main XRA webpage.

**TABLE I-22 SELECTION OF RETIREMENT RATE CATEGORY**

**For valuation dates in 2022**

December 3, 2021
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOrifice Mass Flow Calculation in NASA's W-8 Single Stage Axial Compressor FacilityUpdates to the orifice mass flow calculation for the W-8 Single Stage Axial Compressor Facility at NASA Glenn Research Center are provided to include the effect of humidity and incorporate ISO 5167. A methodology for including the effect of humidity into the inlet orifice mass flow calculation is provided. Orifice mass flow calculations provided by ASME PTC-19.5-2004, ASME MFC-3M-2004, ASME Fluid Meters, and ISO 5167 are compared for W-8's atmospheric inlet orifice plate. Differences in expansion factor and discharge coefficient given by these standards give a variation of about +/- 75% mass flow except for a few cases. A comparison of the calculations with an inlet static pressure mass flow correlation and a fan exit mass flow integration using test data from a 2017 turbofan rotor test in W-8 show good agreement between the inlet static pressure mass flow correlation, ISO 5167, and ASME Fluid Meters. While W-8's atmospheric inlet orifice plate violates the pipe diameter limit defined by each of the standards, the ISO 5167 is chosen to be the primary orifice mass flow calculation to use in the W-8 facility.Document ID20180001298Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBozak, Richard F.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 20, 2018Publication DateFebruary 1, 2018Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2018-219762E-19474GRC-E-DAA-TN50467Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.03.50.03.06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsAerodynamicsMeasurementCompressoAvailable DownloadsNameType20180001298.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2006300EN.01002101.xml

| 9.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/21

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.4381 — JCI/VB/FIAMM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 300/06)

On 4 December 2006, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4381 — JCI/VB/FIAMM, to the following address:

| Commission of the European Communities |
| --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70 |
| B-1000 Brussels |

Commission of the European Communities

Competition DG

Merger Registry

Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70

B-1000 Brussels

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the unaudited
financial  statements  as of and for the period  ended  March 31,  2000,  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          14,597
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                18,958
<PP&E>                          11,709
<DEPRECIATION>                  2,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  28,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           386,280
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1,539,657
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,897,865)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    28,072
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                498,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (498,087)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (498,087)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (498,087)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 545 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 12, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 103(a)(1) of the 
concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2001. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 
(2) the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution, if offered by Representative Rangel or his designee, which 
shall be in order without intervention of any point of order, shall be 
considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation PBG Protecting America's Pension

C s K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005-4026 

AUG 3 2017 

T h e Presiden t 

T h e Whit e Hous e 

Washington , D.C . 2050 0 

Dea r Mr . President : 

W e ar e please d t o submi t th e F Y actuaria l evaluatio n o f th e expecte d operation s an d statu s 

o f th e Pensio n Benefi t Guarant y Corporatio n (PBGC ) fund s as require d b y Sectio n 400 8 o f th e 

Employe e Retiremen t Incom e Securit y Act . Thi s repor t complete s ou r Annua l Repor t fo r 

F Y 2016 . 

Sincerely , 

 Alexande r

 o f Labo r 

Chai r o f th e Boar d 

W . Thoma s Reede r 

Directo r 

Enclosur e 
 Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Protecting America's Pensions K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005-4026 

AUG - 3 2017 

T h e Honorabl e Michae l Penc e 

Presiden t o f th e Senat e 

Washington , D.C . 2051 0 

Dea r Mr . President : 

W e ar e please d t o submi t th e F Y actuaria l evaluatio n o f th e expecte d operation s an d statu s 

o f th e Pensio n Benefi t Guarant y Corporatio n (PBGC ) fund s as require d b y Sectio n 400 8 o f th e 

Employe e Retiremen t Incom e Securit y Act . Thi s repor t complete s ou r Annua l Repor t fo r 

F Y 2016 . 

Sincerely , 

 Alexande r Acost a 

Secretar y o f Labo r 

Chai r o f th e Boar d 

W . Thoma s Reede r 

Directo r 

Enclosur e 
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation PBG Protecting America's Pension

C s Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005-4026 

AUG - 3 2017 

T h e Honorabl e Pau l D . Rya n 

Speake r o f th e Hous e o f 

Representative s 

Washington , D.C . 2051 5 

Dea r Mr . Speaker : 

W e ar e please d t o submi t th e F Y actuaria l evaluatio n o f th e expecte d operation s an d statu s 

o f th e Pensio n Benefi t Guarant y Corporatio n (PBGC ) fund s as require d b y Sectio n 400 8 o f th e 

Employe e Retiremen t Incom e Securit y Act . Thi s repor t complete s ou r Annua l Repor t fo r 

F Y 2016 . 

Sincerely , 

R . Alexande r Acost a 

Secretar y o f Labo r 

Chai r o f th e Boar d 

W . Thoma s Reede r 

Directo r 

Enclosur e
§ 41.27 When can the Tribal college or university expect a decision on its application? Within 45 days of receiving an application, the Director will notify the Tribal college or university in writing whether or not the application has been approved. ( a ) If the Director approves the application, written notice will explain when the BIE will send the Tribal college or university a grant agreement under § 41.19.
( b ) If the Director disapproves the application, written notice will include: ( 1 ) The reasons for disapproval; and
( 2 ) A statement advising the Tribal college or university of the right to amend or supplement the Tribal college's or university's application within 45 days.
( c ) The Tribal college or university may appeal a disapproval or a failure to act within 45 days of receipt following the procedures in § 41.21.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 60660 Summary Calendar

FAUSTINO ROJAS, also known as Faustino Rojas

- Villa ,
Petitioner

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A038 516 056

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Faustino Rojas, a native and citizen of Mexico, has filed a petition for review of the order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the immigration judge’s determination that he was removable pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) and § 1227(a)(2)(B ). Rojas was originally charged in a notice to appear (NTA) in 2005 with removability under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(C) as an arriving alien. In 2014, t he Department of Homeland

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 19, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-60660 Document: 00514201608 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/19/2017N o. 16

- 60660

2 Security (DHS) withdrew the charge under § 1182(a)(2)(C) and added the charges under § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) and § 1227(a)(2)(B) in a Form I

- 261. In his first argument, Rojas contends that DHS used the Form I

- 261 to improperly change his status from an arriving alien to an admitted alien. We have jurisdiction to review this argument pu rsuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D).
We review the BIA’s legal determinations de novo

. Iruegas

- Valdez v. Yates , 846 F.3d 806, 810 (5th Cir. 2017) . Rojas’s argument is unavailing because the NTA alleg ed, and he conceded , that he was admitted to the United States as a legal permanent resident in 1983. Rojas also contends that DHS was required under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(C)(vi) to charge him as an arriving alien following his unauthorized entry into the United States in J uly 2015. Rojas did not raise
this argument before the BIA, and we lack jurisdiction to review it. See § 1252(d)(1); Omari v. Holder , 562 F.3d 314, 318

- 19 (5th Cir. 2009). The petition for review is DENIED. Case: 16-60660 Document: 00514201608 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/19/2017
#### § 48.109 Who may use the funds?

The Bureau-operated school may use funds, including late payment charges, received as compensation for leasing that school's facilities.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of ITXC Corp. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the “Report”), I, Tom Evslin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and theconsolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |

Dated: May 14, 2003

|   | */s/ TOM EVSLIN*                          |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                           |   |
|   | **Tom Evslin**                            |   |
|   | **Chief Executive Officer of ITXC Corp.** |   |

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002.  A signed original of this written statement by Section 906 has been provided to ITXC Corp. and will be retained by ITXC Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Gloria Jean Donley v. Johnnie L. Payne

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00451

- CV

Trial court case number: 84717

- CV

Trial court: 239th District Court of Brazoria C ounty

Appellants have filed a motion for emergency relief, seeking an order staying eviction.

The Court asks appellee to file a response to the motion for emergency relief by 5:00

p.m., Friday, September 22, 2017

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 21, 2017