alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2– CFO Certification**

 

**SATELLITE NEWSPAPERS CORP.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Newspapers Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Hibma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Randy Hibma

Randy Hibma

Chief Financial Officer

 

June 22, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Satellite Newspapers Corp., and will be retained by Heartland, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-23 

December 18, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(4) Plans Covered. Fraternal Association Plans

4021(b)(5) Plans Covered. Employee Contributed Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in reply to your recent letter concerning the possible termination of the * * * Union Fraternal Pension Plan.

The plan termination provisions of Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 do not cover

plans established or maintained by a society, order or association, including a labor union, if no part of the contributions

to the plans are made by the employer of participants in the plan. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, which is

responsible for administering Title IV of the Act, has been informed by the * * * Union that all contributions to the

Union's fraternal plan are made by members and that none are made by the Union itself. If that is the case, the plan is

not subject to the plan termination provisions of the Act. 

For your information we are enclosing a summary of the plan termination insurance program of the new law. 

Steven E. Schanes 

Acting Executive Director
# C_2014053EN.01002601.xml

| 25.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/26

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 March 2014

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

2014/C 53/05

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this Communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending the Implementing Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 2, 7.1.2014, p. 7.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.3.2014 | ... | 0,53 | 0,53 | 2,96 | 0,53 | 0,71 | 0,53 | 0,78 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 1,83 | 3,45 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,69 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 2,75 | 0,53 | 3,72 | 1,29 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,88 |
| 1.1.2014 | 28.2.2014 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 2,96 | 0,53 | 0,71 | 0,53 | 0,78 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 2,35 | 3,45 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,69 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 2,75 | 0,53 | 3,72 | 1,29 | 0,53 | 0,53 | 0,88 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.3.2014

...

0,53

0,53

2,96

0,53

0,71

0,53

0,78

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

1,83

1,83

3,45

0,53

0,53

0,69

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

2,75

0,53

3,72

1,29

0,53

0,53

0,88

1.1.2014

28.2.2014

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

2,96

2,96

0,53

0,53

0,71

0,71

0,53

0,53

0,78

0,78

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

2,35

2,35

3,45

3,45

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,69

0,69

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

2,75

2,75

0,53

0,53

3,72

3,72

1,29

1,29

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,53

0,88

0,88

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 1201 W. 8th at Georgia Ave., Deer Park, TX 77536, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 08, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2013.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: February 10, 2011.

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2011-3830 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
(No. 21421.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*John Davies, Plaintiff in Error.

*Opinion filed October 22, 1932.*

Samuel Barth, and Elwyn E. Long, for plaintiff in error.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, John A. Swanson, State’s Attorney, and J. J. Neiger, ( Edward E. Wilson, and Grenville Beardsley, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. Justice Orr

delivered the opinion of the court:

John Davies, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the municipal court of Chicago of unlawfully, willfully and wrongfully changing, altering and removing the manu*49facturer’s number on a .45-caliber Colt automatic pistol and was sentenced to imprisonment in the House of Correction for one year and to pay a fine of $100 and costs. He sued out this writ of error to review that judgment, and contends that section *2a*of “An act revising the law relating to deadly weapons,” as amended by the act of June 29, 1931, (Smith’s Stat. 1931, chap. 38, par. 153a,) is unconstitutional, and that the weapon from which the manufacturer’s number had been removed was seized by police officers after an unlawful arrest, in violation of his constitutional rights.

The record shows that the constitutional questions here sought to be raised were not raised in the trial court. Although a motion to quash was made, the constitutionality of the statute was not questioned. No questions relating to the validity of the statute were raised in the oral motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. The record does not show that any specific constitutional objections were made in the written motion to suppress the evidence, the only statement relating to the constitution being the assertion that “your petitioner further represents that he expects to stand upon his rights guaranteed him by the State and Federal constitutions in this behalf and as soon as his matter could be heard,” etc. This general statement is not sufficient, as it cannot be known what constitutional question is raised in order to determine whether it has been previously passed upon by this court. The mere statement of the fact that the State and Federal constitutions guarantee certain rights on which one expects to stand is not of itself sufficient to show that a constitutional question was raised in the motion to suppress. *(People*v. Blenz, 317 Ill. 639.) This court cannot take jurisdiction upon the mere statement of counsel that a constitutional question is involved, as it will not search the constitution to discover some basis upon which jurisdiction to entertain the proceedings can be sustained. (I*les*v. Heidenreich, 271 Ill. 480; *People*v. *City*
      *50
      *of Chicago,*238 id. 146.) The mere assignment of error or argument that a constitutional question is involved is insufficient. *(People*v. *Forsyth,*339 Ill. 381.) The offense of which plaintiff in error was found guilty is a misdemeanor, and since no constitutional question was raised in the trial court this court is without jurisdiction to review the case by writ of error or direct appeal.

The cause is accordingly transferred to the Appellate Court for the First District.

, *Cause transferred.*
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# U.S., China Announce Defense Talks

By DoD NewsDefense Media Activity

                WASHINGTON  –              
	David Helvey, deputy assistant secretary of defense for East Asia, will host the talks with Rear Admiral Li Ji, deputy director of the Chinese ministry of national defense foreign affairs office, according to Pentagon spokesman Marine Corps Lt. Col. Jeff Pool.

	The U.S. delegation will include representatives from the Joint Staff, U.S. Pacific Command, the State Department, and the National Security Council staff, Pool said, while the Chinese delegation will include representatives of the Ministry of National Defense and relevant military bodies.

	The meeting, the spokesman said, is an important component of the broader program of engagements between the two nations' militaries, which seeks to foster sustained and substantive dialogue, deepen practical cooperation in areas of mutual interest, and focus on enhancing risk reduction.

	This year's talks, he added, will emphasize the positive momentum sustained in the U.S.-China military-to-military relationship over the past year, which included historic agreements to establish new confidence building measures between the two militaries, and endorse the robust program of engagements planned for the rest of the year.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

U.S.

China Announce Defense Talks

PACOM News

articles
§ 700.137 Final date for voluntary relocation application. ( a ) In order to be considered for voluntary relocation assistance benefits, an applicant must have filed a completed application form with the Commission by the close of business on July 7, 1986.
( b ) To qualify for relocation assistance, individuals must meet the eligibility requirements as of July 7, 1986.
[51 FR 19170, May 28, 1986]
#### § 101.14 Maturity.

The maturity of any United States direct loan shall not exceed thirty years. Loans made will be scheduled for repayment at the earliest possible date consistent with the purpose of the loan and the repayment capacity of the borrower.
#### § 48.204 For what school purposes may employees fundraise?

Employees may fundraise for school purposes as defined in § 48.3.
### [§2380a. Renumbered §3457]
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-21 

January 24, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022(a) Benefits Guaranteed. Type of Benefits Guaranteed 

OPINION: 

 This letter is in response to your inquiry of January 3, 1975, as to whether the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

will look at circumstances outside the plan documents in determining whether a benefit is nonforfeitable for purposes

of Section 4022 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. 

Section 4022(a) of the Act provides that: 

"Subject to the limitations contained in subsection (b), the Corporation shall guarantee the payment of all

nonforfeitable benefits (other than benefits becoming nonforfeitable solely on account of the termination of a plan) under

the terms of A plan which terminates at a time when Section 4021 applies to it." 

Therefore, in making a nonforfeitability determination, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation would not

ordinarily look to circumstances outside the terms of the plan. It is conceivable, of course, that circumstances could arise,

such as a successful suit for reformation which would justify departure from the general rule that the terms of the plan

govern. We express no view on that subject, however, since a specific case has not yet arisen. 

I trust this answers [*2] your inquiry. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of Natasha A. Sinclair, an Attorney, Resignor.

[823 NYS2d 703]

Voluntary resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys *(see Matter of Manown,*240 AD2d 83 [1998]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Gorski, Green and Pine, JJ. (Filed Nov. 2, 2006.)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

77-146 

May 24, 1977 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021. Plans Covered 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to * * * letter to you regarding the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's ("PBGC") position

that Taft-Hartley pension plans are covered by Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

("ERISA" or "Act"). 

PBGC has not taken the position that all Taft-Hartley plans are defined benefit plans subject to Title IV of the Act.

PBGC has taken the position that a plan is not excluded from Title IV, or from being a defined benefit plan, merely

because employer contributions are limited to a fixed cents per hour contribution by a collective bargaining agreement

between an employer and a union. 

ERISA provides that a defined benefit plan is a pension plan other than an individual account plan. Act, § 3(35).

An individual account plan is defined as any plan which maintains individual accounts for each participant and provides

for benefits based solely on the amounts in a participant's account. Act, § 3(34). Unless it is excluded from coverage

for some other reason, any plan that does not meet the definition of an individual account plan is a defined benefit plan,

subject to Title IV of the Act. 

The provisions of ERISA evolved [*2] slowly over several years of Congressional study and research.

Examinations of the structure of pension plans in the United States indicated that many plans are funded by fixed

employer contributions, even though the plans provide for a defined benefit. Congressional studies and hearings also

showed that thousands of plan participants lost their pension benefits because employers limited their liability for the

payment of benefits solely to the making of contributions to the pension plan. If, upon plan termination, an employer's

fixed contribution rate proved inadequate to fund promised plan benefits, plan participants lost their benefits. Because

plans established in this fashion can terminate with insufficent assets to pay promised plan benefits, Congress determined

that benefits provided by this type of plan should be covered by the Title IV insurance program. 

Congress was obviously aware that many Taft-Hartley plans are also established to provide defined benefits funded

by a fixed rate of employer contributions. However, in enacting Title IV, Congress made no distinction between TaftHartley plans and other defined benefit plans where the employer is obligated to contribute [*3] at a fixed rate. Rather,

Congress clearly sought to protect participants in all defined benefit plans (other than those specifically excluded from

coverage) from losing their benefits. 

Thus, under ERISA, if a fixed contribution rate proves to have been inadequate to fund promised plan benefits, upon

plan termination plan participants no longer lose their pensions. Instead, PBGC ascertains the amount of a plan's

insufficiency and pays the benefits guaranteed by Title IV. 

I hope the information set forth above gives you a better understanding of PBGC's position on plans subject to Title

IV coverage, including Taft-Hartley plans. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### SUBCHAPTER I—DEFINITIONS, ORGANIZATION, AND GENERAL PROVISIONS AFFECTING SYSTEM
P ursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-20844 Summary Calendar

DONALD R. TEZINO, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-94-332)

July 16, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Donald R. Tezino, Jr. (“Tezino”) who is an African-American

sued his employer, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company (“Dupont”),

claiming that he was discriminated against in his employment

advanceme nt because of his race in violation of Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1965, as amended. His claim was presented by

agreement as a bench trial before the district court. At the2

con clusion of Tezino’s testimony, the district court ruled that

there was no evidence upon which his claim of racial discrimination

could be based and entered an order of dismissal under F ED

. R. C IV

.

P. 52(c).

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and

relevant portions of the record itself and the findings of fact and

conclusions of la w entered by the district court in its order of

dismissal under date of September 11, 1995. We are unable to say

that any of the findings of fact or conclusions of law of the

district court were either clearly erroneous or erroneous, as

applicable; and accordingly we affirm the final judgment entered by

the district court under date of September 11, 1995.

AFFIRMED

.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Shipping US Army Equipment for Orient Shield 14, a Huge Undertaking 

By Master Sgt. Corine LombardoNew York Army National Guard

                SHIRAOI PORT, Japan  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles