alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2000, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         237,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               238,223
<PP&E>                                           3,964
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,172
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,266
<OTHER-SE>                                     235,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,987
<SALES>                                            300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               226,516
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (218,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       349
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (219,151)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (219,151)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. LAVISCOUNT

No. 41P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 680

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1990.
### Stratigraphy of the Inyan Kara group and localization of uranium deposits, southern Black Hills, South Dakota and Wyoming

By: Garland Bayard GottDon E. WolcottC. Gilbert Bowles

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp763

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.

The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.                    

*Date:*                         March 24, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personal qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5 Research Court, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call.)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Andrew J. Griffith, PhD, MD, Director, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 5 Research Court, Room 1A13, Rockville, MD 20850. 301-496-1960.                         *griffita@nidcd.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 16, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4026 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Nebraska;**

**Regional Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Best Available Retrofit Technology Determination**  

### Appendices **June 15, 2012 Final**  **Action**
 EPA TSD Appendix B

– revised  EPA TSD Appendix C

– revised  EPA Appendix D: Gerald Gentleman Station SCR BART cost analys is spreadsheet  EPA Appendix E: EPA’s evaluation of cost of SCR controls at NPPD Gerald Gentlemen Station, Units 1 and 2  EPA Appendix F: Cost c omparison of SCR limits  EPA Appendix G: Responses to comments and revisions to EPA’s evaluation of cost of FGD controls at NPPD Gerald Gentlemen Station, Units 1 and 2

Note th at in the proposed action, the following appendices were included. We list them here for the reader’s reference : **Proposed Action :**  **77 FR 12770 ( March 2, 2012)** 
 EPA’s TSD for NE Regional Haze  EPA TSD Appendix A: EPA’s evaluation of cost of FGD controls at NPPD Gerald Gentlemen Station, Units 1 and 2  EPA TSD Appendix B: Gerald Gentleman Station NOx and SO2 emission rates, 2001 - 2010  EPA TSD Appendix C: Gerald Gentleman Station FGD BART cost analysis spreadsheet
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Azkaa Chaudhry, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Charlotte E. Davidson, J.), rendered January 22, 2018, convicting her, upon her plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Charlotte E. Davidson, J.), rendered January 22, 2018, affirmed.</p><p>Defendant's challenge to her plea is unpreserved and does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (<i>see People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375, 381-382 [2015]). We decline to review this claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the record establishes that defendant's guilty plea to disorderly conduct, a violation, in satisfaction of all charges in the misdemeanor complaint, was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (<i>see People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d at 382). At the plea proceeding, defendant stated that she had ample time to discuss her case with counsel, waived specific constitutional rights, including the right to a trial by jury, and acknowledged that she would be sentenced to a conditional discharge, which required her to perform four days of community service.</p><p>In any event, the only relief defendant requests is dismissal of the accusatory instrument, rather than vacatur of the plea, and she expressly requests that this court affirm her conviction if it does not grant dismissal. Since dismissal is not warranted, we affirm on this basis as well (<i>see People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d at 385 n 1; <a href="../2016/2016_03598.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Teron</i>, 139 AD3d 450</a> [2016]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur <i><br>Decision Date: October 15, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></i></partyblock>
### [§2532. Renumbered §4852]
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Pre-PPA 4010 Gateway Test 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Pre-PPA 4010 Gateway Test

ERISA section 4010 generally requires controlled groups to report to the PBGC if the aggregate unfunded vested benefits in plans maintained by the controlled group exceed $50 million (disregarding plans with no unfunded vested benefits) ("the 4010 Gateway Test").  The following table provides the applicable rates to be used for the 4010 Gateway Test.

On February 2, 2007, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) published final regulations containing updated mortality tables for determining current liability under section 412(l)(7) of the Code and section 302(d)(7) of ERISA for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2007. As a result, in accordance with section 4006(a)(3)(E)(iii) of ERISA, the interest rate to be used for the 4010 Gateway test for plan years ending on or after December 31, 2006 increases from 85 to 100 percent of the composite corporate bond rate.

**Note  - The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) replaces the $50 million 4010 Gateway test with a new Gateway test based on funding percentage.  The new Gateway test uses a different interest rate basis and applies only to information years beginning after 2007. The interest rates on this page relate only to the pre-PPA Gateway test.  See Technical Update 07-2 for more information.**

April 27, 2017
### §949p–2. Pretrial conference

(a) Motion.—At any time after service of charges, any party may move for a pretrial conference to consider matters relating to classified information that may arise in connection with the prosecution.

(b) Conference.—Following a motion under subsection (a), or sua sponte, the military judge shall promptly hold a pretrial conference. Upon request by either party, the court shall hold such conference ex parte to the extent necessary to protect classified information from disclosure, in accordance with the practice of the Federal courts under the Classified Information Procedures Act (18 U.S.C. App.).

(c) Matters To Be Established at Pretrial Conference.—

(1) Timing of subsequent actions.—At the pretrial conference, the military judge shall establish the timing of—

(A) requests for discovery;

(B) the provision of notice required by section 949p–5 of this title; and

(C) the initiation of the procedure established by section 949p–6 of this title.

(2) Other matters.—At the pretrial conference, the military judge may also consider any matter—

(A) which relates to classified information; or

(B) which may promote a fair and expeditious trial.

(d) Effect of Admissions by Accused at Pretrial Conference.—No admission made by the accused or by any counsel for the accused at a pretrial conference under this section may be used against the accused unless the admission is in writing and is signed by the accused and by the counsel for the accused.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2591.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Classified Information Procedures Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 96–456, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2025, which is set out in the Appendix to Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
#### § 48.5 How does the Paperwork Reduction Act affect this part?

The collections of information in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned OMB Control Number 1076-NEW and OMB Control Number 1090-0009. Response is required to obtain a benefit. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
### §2816. Consideration of energy security and energy resilience in life-cycle cost for military construction

(a) In General.—(1) The Secretary concerned, when evaluating the life-cycle designed cost of a covered military construction project, shall include as a facility requirement the long-term consideration of energy security and energy resilience that would ensure that the resulting facility is capable of continuing to perform its missions, during the life of the facility, in the event of a natural or human-caused disaster, an attack, or any other unplanned event that would otherwise interfere with the ability of the facility to perform its missions.

(2) A facility requirement under paragraph (1) shall not be weighed, for cost purposes, against other facility requirements in determining the design of the facility.

(b) Inclusion in the Building Life-cycle Cost Program.—The Secretary shall include the requirements of subsection (a) in applying the latest version of the building life-cycle cost program, as developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, to consider on-site distributed energy assets in a building design for a covered military construction project.

(c) Covered Military Construction Project Defined.—(1) In this section, the term "covered military construction project" means a military construction project for a facility that is used to perform critical functions during a natural or human-caused disaster, an attack, or any other unplanned event.

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term "facility" includes at a minimum any of the following:

(A) Operations centers.

(B) Nuclear command and control facilities.

(C) Integrated strategic and tactical warning and attack assessment facilities.

(D) Continuity of government facilities.

(E) Missile defense facilities.

(F) Air defense facilities.

(G) Hospitals.

(H) Armories and readiness centers of the National Guard.

(I) Communications facilities.

(J) Satellite and missile launch and control facilities.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. B, title XXVIII, §2804(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4320.)
### §9413. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: establishment

There is in the Department of the Air Force a United States Air Force Institute of Technology, the purposes of which are to perform research and to provide, to members of the Air Force and Space Force (including the reserve components) and civilian employees of such Department, advanced instruction and technical education regarding their duties.

(Added Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, §558(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1741.)
### [§2302d. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1881(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4293]

Section, added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VIII, §805(a)(2), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2605; amended Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1073(a)(41), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1902; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §§1806(c)(3), 1846(e)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4155, 4249, related to definitional threshold amounts of a major system.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2006294EN.01003502.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/35

---

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 4 August 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Innsbruck — Austria) — Zentralbetriebsrat der Landeskrankenhäuser Tirols v Land Tirol

(Case C-339/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/62)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 21.11.2005.

1

---
# C_2006248EN.01000301.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/3

---

New national side of euro circulation coins

(2006/C 248/03)

Image

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing anyone required to handle coins in the course of their work and the public at large. In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the 2 euro denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the obverse national side.

1

2

Issuing State: Republic of San Marino

Subject of commemoration: 500th anniversary of the death of Christopher Columbus

Factual description of the design: portrait of Christopher Columbus and a representation of the three Caravels; above the portrait the inscription ‘SAN MARINO’ and the wind rose; in the middle the mint mark ‘R’; below, the dates ‘1506 — 2006’ in a cartouche and the initials of the author Luciana De Simoni ‘LDS’; on the outer ring, the twelve stars of the European flag surrounding the design.

Issuing volume: 120 000 coins

Approximate issuing date: October 2006

Edge lettering: 2 ★, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted

---

(1)  See OJ C 373 of 28.12.2001, p. 1 for a reference to all national sides that were issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264 of 15.10.2003, p. 38).

2

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF JAMES A. RICHMAN PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James A. Richman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 9, 2004



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/    JAMES A. RICHMAN                 
|James A. Richman Chief Financial Officer