alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 72 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 72

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                    the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1999

 Mr. Kasich submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                    the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Budget (hereinafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $9,940,000 for the One Hundred 
Sixth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $4,970,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1999, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2000; and
            (2) not more than $4,970,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2000, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2001.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.1









Exhibit 4.1




MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

AMENDMENT No. 1




Dated as of August 9, 2007




               WHEREAS, Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to secure for the Company and its shareholders the benefits
of the incentive inherent in increased common stock ownership by members of the Company’s Board of
Directors (the “Board”) and employees of the Company;



               WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 11 of the Plan, the Board may amend the Plan provided that any
amendment that would (i) materially increase the aggregate number of shares which may be issued
under the Plan, (ii) materially increase the benefits accruing to employees under the Plan, or
(iii) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, shall be
subject to the approval of the Company’s shareholders;



               WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to (i) reduce the aggregate number of shares
which may be issued under the Plan and (ii) eliminate the Compensation Committee of the Board’s
ability to require, as a condition to a subsequent Award, the return of Awards previously granted
under the Plan; and



               WHEREAS, the Board believes that the amendment does not require approval of Monro Muffler
Brake, Inc.’s stockholders because the amendment will not (i) materially increase the aggregate
number of shares which may be issued under the Plan, (ii) materially increase the benefits accruing
to employees under the Plan, or (iii) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for
participation in the Plan;



               NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to and in exercise of the authority retained by the Board under
Article 11 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective August 9, 2007, to provide as
follows:




	 	1.	 	The first sentence of Section 2.2 of the Plan is hereby
amended by replacing 575,000 with 388,000.
	 
	 	2.	 	Section 2.3 shall be deleted in its entirety.
	 
	 	3.	 	The Plan, except as otherwise set forth herein, shall remain
in full force and effects in all other respects.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Amendment to be executed, to be effective as of
the day and year first written above.
EXHIBIT 32

Section 906 Certification

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, updated
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the sole general partner of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., (the Company) hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 13, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 23, 2008



/s/ W. Edward WalterW. Edward WalterChief Executive Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.




/s/ Larry K. HarveyLarry K. HarveyChief Financial Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
### [§304. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §802(d)(3), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 146]

Section, Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2560, related to cases ancillary to foreign proceedings.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.52 What may a Tribe include in a TERA? A TERA under this part: ( a ) May include development of all or part of a Tribe's energy resources;
( b ) Must specify the type of energy resource included;
( c ) May include assumption by the Tribe of certain activities normally carried out by the Department, except for inherently Federal functions; and
( d ) Must specify the services or resources related to the specific activity related to energy resource development that the Tribe proposes to assume from the Department.
### [§2318. Renumbered §3249]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20267 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PEDRO ZAMARRON-CERVANTES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-272-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 23, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Pedro Zamarron-Cervantes appeals his sentence imposed by the district court for being present in the United States, without permission, following deportation. He argues that the district court did not provide notice of the specific grounds that it intended to use for an upward departure and that the district court improperly departed upward from the Sentencing Guidelines. A district court may depart upward from the guidelines if the court finds that an aggravating circumstance exists that wasNo. 98-20267 -2- not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b). The district court must state “the specific reason for the imposition of a sentence” outside the guideline range. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). A district court’s decision to depart from the guidelines is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Ashburn , 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). A departure from the guidelines will be affirmed on appeal if (1) the district court gives acceptable reasons for departing, and (2) the extent of the departure is reasonable. Id. A sentencing court must provide the parties an opportunity to comment upon matters relating to the appropriate sentence. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(1). Rule 32, Fed. R. Crim. P., requires that the district court give the parties reasonable notice that it is contemplating making an upward departure. Burns v. United
States , 501 U.S. 129, 138 (1991). “This notice must specifically identify the ground on which the district court is contemplating an upward departure.” Id. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in departing upward from the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court provided adequate reasons for its incremental upward departures. The district court demonstrated proper reliance on the guideline levels and consideration of the number and type of crimes committed. The departure was not unreasonably excessive in light of the defendant’s extensive criminal history. A review of the record indicates that the Presentence Report addressed theNo. 98-20267 -3- possibility of an upward departure and the grounds therefor and provided Zamarron-Cervantes with adequate notice. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 700.539 Soliciting contributions. ( a ) An employee shall not solicit a contribution from another employee for a gift to an official superior, make a donation as a gift to an official superior or accept a gift from an employee receiving less pay than himself or herself. (5 U.S.C. 7351) However, this paragraph does not preclude a voluntary gift of nominal value made on a special occasion.
( b ) If authorized by the supervisor, an employee may solicit contributions for charitable causes. He or she may also be permitted to collect small donations for gifts for fellow employees for special occasions during slack moments.
#### Isaac Katz, Respondent, v Tower Insurance Company of New York, Defendant, and Silberstein Brokerage, Inc., Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 146]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence in the procurement of insurance coverage, the defendant Silberstein Brokerage, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated March 3, 2005, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

An insurance agent or broker may be held liable under a theory of negligence for failing to procure insurance *(see Mickey’s Rides-N-More, Inc. v Anthony Viscuso Brokerage, Inc.,*17 AD3d 328, 329 [2005]; *Structural Bldg. Prods. Corp. v Business Ins. Agency,*281 AD2d 617 [2001]; *American Ref-Fuel Co. of Hempstead v Resource Recycling,*281 AD2d 574, 575 [2001]). In order for a broker to be held so liable, however, “a plaintiff must demonstrate that the . . . broker failed to discharge the duties imposed by the agreement to obtain insurance, either by proof that it breached the agreement or because it failed to exercise due care in the transaction” *(Mickey’s Rides-N-More, Inc. v Anthony Viscuso Brokerage, Inc., supra*at 329; *see Structural Bldg. Prods. Corp. v Business Ins. Agency, supra*at *433620; *American Ref-Fuel Co. of Hempstead v Resource Recycling, supra*at 575; *Santaniello v Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co.,*267 AD2d 372 [1999]). In the instant case, the defendant Silberstein Brokerage, Inc., failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law insofar as there exists a triable issue of fact as to whether it exercised due care in the transaction. Accordingly, the cross motion was properly denied. Schmidt, J.P, Adams, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.
### W&*dA/£t=&}/ 2^tece?>76&e. 0£,^£>/S- /*4*/* /tLtiAee 1 /2.-/S ^SttfeSS&m* 'OF APPEALS 12tn Court erf Acpais District 

### <Z>&?)£ /f0At0£j4<£/& £/&e£l_ deed -to JCw>h/J$£ C{//?<e£Azr^27?rfc£s 

## ApaeiQJ. ^7/s zct'^tz://<pe*/eh:/d2 &£ A^^-^ks.Coujer^L

ZZ2ZSC/&J, jZaJ jfPf&rtZ&Al, "_ 7/J*d /^/so uj/id ^Acry*/ -zs A/iy A^&&ij4<£rG£d&jJ aaA ^da/T^b cL 

### 7

dMu^^r^t_ .£JL*0&&&jLl /, h C 2, -xpm^^^/^^L

-
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Publications             
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeCareersSpecial Agent

 

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
----

**NATOFROM BERLIN TO BOSNIATrans-Atlantic Securityin TransitionS. Nelson Drew
McNair Paper 35January 1995ContentsCopyright Notice
"The Bonfire of the Certainties"...and the Walls Came Tumbling Down"The Rhetoric of Rome: Vision or Requiem?NATO Confronts the "Test Case from Hell"Making It Up As We Go AlongGetting It Right?An Even Rockier Road Ahead?NATO, the U.S., CJTF, and ESDINACC's Role in PeacekeepingPartnership for PeaceThe Membership QuestionNATO without Barbarians
BibliographyNotesReturn to MacNair Paper IndexReturn to INSS Home Page

**
### [§2337a. Renumbered §4325]
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Penton Media Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
          Report.


Date:  August 14, 2003

                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas L. Kemp
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Preston L. Vice
                                        Chief Financial Officer



     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
#### Fuchs *v.*Krayniak.

[No. 12,128

Filed October 8, 1925.]

From Lake Circuit Court; *E. Miles Norton,*Judge.

Action by John Krayniak against Sadie Fuchs. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*William H. Matthew,*for appellant.

*Sheehan, Lyddick & Sharavsky,*for appellee.

Nichols, J.

Action by appellee in the city court of the city of Gary, Indiana, to recover for real estate commissions in which judgment was rendered against appellant, from which an appeal was taken to the Lake Circuit Court, where judgment was against appellant. The only error relied on in this court is the court’s action in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial which presents the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision of the court. There was ample evidence to sustain the decision.

Affirmed.
McNair Paper Number 44, International Military Education and Training:  An Assessment, October 1995
**CONTENTSTO ENHANCE SECURITY
LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND
THE STRUCTURE OF U.S. FOREIGN MILITARY EDUCATION AND TRAINING
FOREIGN MILITARY EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN FY 1995
A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING IMET'S EFFECTIVENESS
CONTRIBUTIONS TO LONG-TERM REGIONAL STABILITY
CONTRIBUTIONS TO BUILDING COOPERATIVE MILITARY RELATIONSHIPS
CONTRIBUTIONS TO U.S. DIPLOMATIC
INTERESTS OVERSEAS AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS AT HOME
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMET: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS
MAKING A GOOD PROGRAM BETTER
NOTES
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
*Return to NDU Homepage *INSS Homepage *What's New*****
# C_2006310EN.01002905.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/29

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 October 2006 — Weghorst-Oliko v Commission

(Case T-314/99) (1)

1

(2006/C 310/62)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 4.3.2000.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2006/s/ Joseph M. DonabauerJoseph M. DonabauerVice President & Controller(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
 28
# C_2006173EN.01000101.xml

| 26.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 July 2006

(2006/C 173/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2636 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4612 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68330 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2655 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5737 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,46 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9400 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,360 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9106 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5445 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,070 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9350 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6727 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4406 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8276 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0170 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0012 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 203,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,8227 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0924 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2665 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 524,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,660 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,549 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,990 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2636

JPY

Japanese yen

147,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4612

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68330

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2655

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5737

ISK

Iceland króna

92,46

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9400

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,360

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9106

RON

Romanian leu

3,5445

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,070

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9350

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6727

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4406

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8276

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0170

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0012

KRW

South Korean won

1 203,58

ZAR

South African rand

8,8227

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0924

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2665

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 524,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,660

PHP

Philippine peso

65,549

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0200

THB

Thai baht

47,990

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---