alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2355

DONALD VAN METER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, 

Fairfax District Office, Acting in Individual Capacity; FRANCESCA GAINS, 

Acting in Individual Capacity; KIMBERLY WILSON, Appeals Examiner,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00892-LO-JFA)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Van Meter, Appellant Pro Se. Scott F. Weber, DIVISION OF CHILD 

SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald Van Meter appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint 

alleging civil rights violations relating to state court orders on domestic relations cases. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Van Meter v. DCSE, No. 1:17-cv-00892-LO-JFA 

(E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002:


In connection with this quarterly report of iEntertainment Network, Inc. on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his knowledge:

1.   This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Act of 1934: and

2.   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
     iEntertainment Network, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     report.


Date:  November 14, 2002

                                               /s/ J.W. Stealey
                                            --------------------------
                                                   J.W. Stealey
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                       25
### Part A—Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
### [§2886. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–92, div. B, title XXX, §3014(d)(1), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1926]

Section, added Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VI, §602(a), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1417, prohibited collection of amounts in addition to rent from members assigned to military family housing units or military unaccompanied housing units. See section 2891a(f) of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30,
2007 of KeySpan  Corporation (the  "Corporation"),  as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gerald Luterman,
Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Corporation,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Corporation.



Date: August 3, 2007


                                                 /s/Gerald Luterman
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Gerald Luterman
                                                 Executive Vice President
                                                 and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 720.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Larry L. Kolzow, appellant.

236 N. W. 2d 837

Filed December 24, 1975.

No. 40266.

*94Ernest H. Addison and James M. Tyler, for appellant.

Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Bernard L. Packett, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.

Spencer, J.

Defendant, Larry L. Kolzow, entered a plea of nolo contendere to a charge of embezzlement. The court accepted his plea and after a presentence investigation sentenced him to confinement in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex for a period of 3 years. The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in sentencing the defendant to prison rather than placing him on probation. We affirm.

Defendant embezzled approximately $25,000 while employed as a bookkeeper for the Record Printing Company, Inc. Defendant admitted embezzling funds from a previous employer, Vickers Oil Company of Des Moines, Iowa. He was not charged with this crime and agreed to repay the amount embezzled, about $16,000 or $17,000. A portion of the money embezzled herein was used to repay Vickers Oil Company.

No purpose will be served by a further discussion of the facts. The determination of whether to grant probation to one convicted of a crime is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court; and the denial *95of probation will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a showing of abuse of judicial discretion. State v. Ward (1974), 191 Neb. 421, 216 N. W. 2d 163. We find no abuse of discretion herein.

Defendant suggests that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. A flat 3 year sentence under the statute in question is the equivalent of a 1 to 3 year sentence. It is well within the limit of 1 to 7 years. Where the punishment of an offense is left to the discretion of a court to be exercised within certain statutorily prescribed limits, a sentence imposed within such limits will not be disturbed on appeal unless there appears to be an abuse of discretion. State v. Johnson (1974), 191 Neb. 54, 213 N. W. 2d 716. There was no abuse of discretion therein.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
### §1735f–6. Secondary mortgages held by State or local governmental agency on insured properties

In carrying out the provisions of subchapter II of this chapter with respect to insuring mortgages secured by a one- to four-family dwelling unit, the Secretary may not deny such insurance for any such mortgage solely because the dwelling unit which secures such mortgage will be subject to a secondary mortgage or loan made or insured, or other secondary lien held, by any State or local governmental agency or instrumentality under terms and conditions approved by the Secretary.

(June 27, 1934, ch. 847, title V, §528, as added Pub. L. 95–557, title III, §323, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2102.)
#### Samuel T. Banes v. Roy A. Rainey.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice.
### [§2384a. Renumbered §3242]
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Global Energy Inc. - Exhibit 10.1






Resultz Media Group Corp 

7651 Tecumseh Rd. E Suite 201 
Windsor, ON Canada 
N8T
1E9 

Fax: 1-519-419-3597 

Consulting and Services Agreement 

This service agreement is made and entered into this May 22,
2008 by Resultz Media Group Corp “RMG” and “The Client” for services concerning
Global Energy Inc. (OTCBB: GEYI)

Terms of the contract carry out for 1 month; beginning on or
following the date negotiated and paid. 

	1. 	
      RMG shall provide consulting and marketing
    services.

	 	 	 
	2. 	
      RMG shall provide an all encompassing awareness campaign
      throughout the investment community.

	 	 	 
	3. 	
      RMG shall provide profiles on its various investing web
      sites.

	 	 	 
	4. 	
      RMG shall continue increasing of marketing &
      awareness for the full term of contract, with profiles to its
      subscribers.

	 	 	 
	5. 	
      RMG shall present GEYI investment information through
      various forms of communications to interested parties.

	 	 	 
	6. 	
      For the services rendered, RMG will be
  compensated:

	 	 	 
		
      	

	
      $25,000 wired cash payable a minimum of 5 business days
      before initiating the campaign

		
      	

	
      $10,000 wired cash payable 5 business days following the
      start of the campaign.

		
      	

	
      $10,000 wired cash payable 10 business days following the
      start of the campaign.

	 	 	 
		
      The total value of payment is the full $45,000 cash in
      wire for the complete 1 month term.

	 	 	 
	7. 	
      Faxed copies of the agreement shall constitute actual
      binding documentation of contract. This agreement constitutes and embodies
      the entire understanding and consensus of the parties involved and
      supercedes/replaces any and all prior understandings, agreements and
      negotiations between the parties.

	 	 	 
	8. 	
      RMG & “The Client” shall have the option to renew or
      continue the above terms in an extended contract supplying both parties
      are satisfied and have completed their mutual obligations to one
      another.




	Resultz Media Group 	 	Global Energy Inc. 
	 	 	 
	Name: 	 	Name: Asi Shalgi CEO & President 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 /s/ Asi Shalgi
	 	 	 
	Signature: 	 	Signature: 
	 	 	 
	Date: May 22, 2008 	 	Date: May 22, 2008
§ 63.36 What are the special requirements for Indian child protection and family violence prevention programs? ( a ) Each tribe must develop appropriate standards of service, including caseload standards and staffing requirements. The following caseload standards and staffing requirements are comparable to those recommended by the Child Welfare League of America, and are included to assist tribes in developing standards for Indian child protection and family violence prevention programs: ( 1 ) Caseworkers providing services to abused and neglected children and their families have a caseload of 20 active ongoing cases and five active investigations per caseworker.
( 2 ) Caseworkers providing services to strengthen and preserve families with children have a caseload of 20 families. If intensive family-centered crisis services are provided, a caseload of 10 families per caseworker is recommended.
( 3 ) It is recommended that there be one supervisor for every six caseworkers.
( b ) The negotiation and award of contracts, grants, or funding agreements under these regulations must include the following requirements: ( 1 ) Performance of background investigations to ensure that only those individuals who meet the standards of character contained in § 63.12 are employed in positions which involve regular contact with or control over Indian children.
( 2 ) Submission of an annual report to the contracting officer's representative which details program activities, number of children and families served, and the number of child abuse, child neglect, and family violence reports received.
( 3 ) Assurance that the identity of any person making a report of child abuse or child neglect will not be disclosed without the consent of the individual and that all reports and records collected under these regulations are confidential and to be disclosed only as provided by Federal or tribal law.
( 4 ) Assurance that persons who, in good faith, report child abuse or child neglect will not suffer retaliation from their employers.
#### § 226.26 Determining cost of well.

The term “cost of drilling” as applied where one lessee takes over a well drilled by another, shall include all reasonable, usual, necessary, and proper expenditures. A list of expenses mentioned in this section shall be presented to proposed purchasing lessee within 10 days after the completion of the well. In the event of a disagreement between the parties as to the charges assessed against the well that is to be taken over, such charges shall be determined by the Superintendent.
Exhibit 31.4

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, David Oston, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2016 of Five Oaks Investment Corp.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: June 14, 2017 | /s/ David Oston                                                                                                 
|------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | David Oston                                                                                                     
|                    | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
 (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 654

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the

contributions of Tiger Woods and the Tiger Woods Foundation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. BACA (for himself, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. BISHOP, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr.

BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. BOYD, Ms. CARSON, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. CONDIT,

Mr. CONYERS, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr.

DOYLE, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FOLEY, Mr.

GEPHARDT, Mr. GOODLING, Mr. FORD, Mr. FROST, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr.

HILL of Indiana, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. KILPATRICK, Ms. LEE,

Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. RUSH, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms.

MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. ORTIZ,

Mr. RAHALL, Mr. REYES, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. TOWNS,

and Mr. WYNN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the contributions of Tiger Woods and the Tiger

Woods Foundation.

Whereas although Tiger Woods is only 24 years old and in

only his fourth full year as a professional golfer, he has

four major championship titles among his victories;

Whereas Tiger Woods is the fifth player in history to win all

four major championships—the Masters tournament, the
2

•HRES 654 IH

United States Open, the British Open, and the Professional Golfers’ Association of America championship—

joining the ranks of Gene Sarazen, Ben Hogan, Gary

Player, and Jack Nicklaus;

Whereas Tiger Woods can be compared with Jack Nicklaus

as being one of the greatest golfers of all time;

Whereas Tiger Woods has changed the standard by which excellence in golf is judged;

Whereas Tiger Woods has broken barriers with grace and

dignity by showing that golf is a sport for all people, regardless of race, color, or creed;

Whereas Tiger Woods has inspired countless people of all

ages, impressing upon them that their hopes, dreams,

and prayers may be achieved through hard work, persistence, education, and good sportsmanship;

Whereas in 1996, Tiger Woods established the Tiger Woods

Foundation, which financially supports communities and

organizations that nurture family values and adult involvement in children’s lives; and

Whereas the Tiger Woods Foundation clinics give thousands

of youngsters golf lessons and also draw attention and

support to organizations that allow inner-city children access to golf: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) honors and recognizes the achievements

3 made by Tiger Woods and the contributions of the

4 Tiger Woods Foundation in promoting excellence

5 and good sportsmanship and in breaking barriers
3

•HRES 654 IH

1 with grace and dignity by showing that golf is a

2 sport for all people; and

3 (2) urges all Americans, of all races, colors, and

4 creeds, to take a moment to recognize the achieve5 ments of Tiger Woods and the contributions to

6 American society of the Tiger Woods Foundation.

Æ
IV

House Calendar No. 150

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 359

[Report No. 106–444]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3196) making appropriations

for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3196) making

appropriations for foreign operations, export financing,

and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3196) mak4 ing appropriations for foreign operations, export financ5 ing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending Sep-
2

HRES 359 RH

1 tember 30, 2000, and for other purposes. The bill shall

2 be considered as read for amendment. The previous ques3 tion shall be considered as ordered on the bill and any

4 amendment thereto to final passage without intervening

5 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and

6 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

7 of the Committee on Appropriations; (2) the amendment

8 printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom9 panying this resolution, if offered by Representative

10 Young of Florida or his designee, which shall be in order

11 without intervention of any point of order or demand for

12 division of the question, shall be considered as read, and

13 shall be separately debatable for the time specified in the

14 report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and

15 an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or

16 without instructions.

House Calendar No. 150

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 359

[Report No. 106–444]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3196)

making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and forother purposes.

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 571.4 Investigation completion letter.

In instances where Commission has concluded its investigation of a particular matter and will not recommend the commencement of an enforcement proceeding against a respondent at that time, the Commission's authorized representative, in his or her discretion, may advise the party by letter that the investigation has been completed. An investigation completion letter does not constitute a finding that no violation of IGRA, NIGC regulations, or a tribe's approved gaming ordinance or resolution occurred. Further, an investigation completion letter does not preclude the reopening of an investigation or the initiation of an enforcement action by the Chair.

[77 FR 47517, Aug. 9, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 31995, June 5, 2015]
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-20 

February 10, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4062(e). Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans. Closing of Facility Affecting More Than 20% of Plan

Participants 

OPINION: 

In your letter of November 14, 1975, you inquired about the application of Section 4062(e) of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter, the "Act") to the * * * Corporation's planned consolidation of its

production facilities. You also asked that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (hereinafter, the "PBGC") indicate

the type of indemnity agreement that would be acceptable to it, under Section 4063(e), if Section 4062(e) is found to

apply to the situation you have described. 

The PBGC's policy with regard to the interpretation and application of Section 4062(e) is, as you are aware, in the

process of development. Because we understand that your client is delaying its consolidation pending a resolution of

these Title IV issues, it might be more expeditious for * * * Corporation and the PBGC to enter into a indemnity

agreement that would become effective in the event Section 4062(e) does apply, rather than awaiting an authoritative

determination on a complex policy matter. 

Enclosed is the original and one copy of the indemnity agreement [*2] that, in the view of the PBGC, would satisfy

the purposes of Sections 4063 and 4064 of the Act in this situation. If * * * accepts this agreement, the PBGC can waive

the alternative bond or escrow requirements that would be imposed on * * * if Section 4062(e) applies to the planned

consolidation of operations. I understand you have been in communication with * * * of this Office concerning the form

and content of the enclosed agreement, and that it is likely to be acceptable to your client. Unless you have further

changes to propose, please return both copies to * * * after they have been signed by the appropriate officer of the * *

* and we will return one fully executed copy to you. If you do wish to suggest additional modifications, please be in

touch with * * * directly, at * * * 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel.

8 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT

9 and ROBERTA PEKARCIK,

10 Petitioners-Appellees,

11 v. NO. 30,744

12 PHILIP PEKARCIK,

13 Respondent-Appellant.

14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

15 David K. Thomson, District Judge

16 McDevitt Law Firm, P.A.

17 Susan Schaefer McDevitt

18 Santa Fe, NM

19 for Appellee

20 Philip Pekarcik

21 Los Lunas, NM

22 Pro Se Appellant

23 MEMORANDUM OPINION

24 VIGIL, Judge.
2

1 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed

2 summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed

3 and the time for doing so has expired.

4 REVERSED.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________

7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

11 _________________________________

12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge