alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §905a. Art. 105a. False or unauthorized pass offenses

(a) Wrongful Making, Altering, etc.—Any person subject to this chapter who, wrongfully and falsely, makes, alters, counterfeits, or tampers with a military or official pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Wrongful Sale, etc.—Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully sells, gives, lends, or disposes of a false or unauthorized military or official pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card, knowing that the pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card is false or unauthorized, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(c) Wrongful Use or Possession.—Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully uses or possesses a false or unauthorized military or official pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card, knowing that the pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card is false or unauthorized, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5416, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
# C_2007009EN.01000801.xml

| 13.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/8

---

Call for applications concerning the appointment of operators charged with providing the universal electronic communications service

(2007/C 9/08)

The French Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Industry hereby announces its intention to proceed with a call for applications concerning the appointment of one or two operator(s) charged with providing the telephone information services and directories component of the universal electronic communications service in France.

A notice of the call for applications will shortly be published in the Journal Officiel de la République Française (Official Bulletin of the French Republic). It will be available for consultation on the website www.telecom.gouv.fr

Journal Officiel de la République Française

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# PACAF F-16 Demo Team Key to Forging Friendships in Pacific

By Tech. Sgt. Terri Paden, 15th Wing Public Affairs

                Langkawi, Malaysia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News and Articles
### SUBCHAPTER XVII—RESERVE-BANK BRANCHES
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-28 

October 15, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041(b) Termination by Plan Administrator. Notice of Sufficiency

4044 Allocation of Assets 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter requesting a ruling from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") that

the method of distribution proposed for the above-referenced defined benefit pension plan ("Plan") is acceptable under

Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq. (1976

and Supp. IV 1980). 

The Plan was terminated, effective December 10, 1981, in conjunction with a change in the nature of the plan

sponsor's retirement program for employees through the establishment of a defined contribution plan. The Plan

administrator has received qualifying bids which indicate that the current cash value of the insurance contract used to

fund the Plan is adequate to purchase all accured benefits. Under the terms of the Plan, any excess assets after

satisfaction of all liabilities revert to the plan sponsor. 

The insurance company has offered to make payments on discontinuance of the group annuity contract over a period

of five years which are substantially larger in aggregate than would be available in a single-installment [*2] cash-out

of the group annuity contract. To take advantage of the substantially greater amounts available over the five-year term,

the Plan administrator has offered participants an election. They may receive a distribution of their benefits in the normal

form of a paid-up annuity or in the form of payments over a five-year term to the individual's account in the employer's

defined contribution plan. The employer has also waived its right to recover excess assets so that all amounts in excess

of allocated benefit payments will be distributed to participants. All participants have taken the five-year payment option.

Consistent actuarial assumptions based on PBGC's tables have been used in calculating benefits. We assume all

participants will be fully vested in the amount of any " roll-over". 

PBGC will consider the election by participants to transfer their benefits to a defined contribution plan under the

circumstances described above to be a distribution of all plan assets for purposes of Title IV of ERISA, including the

cessation of liability for premiums payable to the PBGC. See PBGC Opinion Letter No. 76-70. Please note that the

amount of excess assets allocable to participants [*3] (both active and terminated vested) is determined under 29 C.F.R.

§ 2618.30-32, 46 Fed. Reg. 49845 (October 8, 1981) (copy enclosed) based on the ratio of an individual's benefits in

priority categories 2-6 to total benefits in the same categories, unless the Plan administrator seeks and receives approval

of an alternative method. 

I trust this will help you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### § 581.5 How do I file a motion to supplement the record?

Upon its own motion or the motion of a party, the Commission may allow the submission of additional evidence. A party may file a motion for leave to submit additional evidence at any time prior to issuance of a final decision by the Commission. Such motion shall show with particularity that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for failure to previously submit such evidence. The Commission may adjust its time for issuing a final decision accordingly, unless the subject of the appeal is a temporary closure order.
### [§§3532 to 3535. Omitted]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

See Codification note set out under section 3531 of this title.
-. 

. 

. i- 

. . 

. 

: . 
, 

. 

-. -? 

1 

# 

i 

1 

. 

. . 

; 

. . L 

i 

: .i 

. 

j 

:- 

1 . 

-m _... . -. . . . . _. 

.,.. _. _ . , 

.- 

-. 

- 

:r ; --. _ 

i..X:ob 

. 

. . 

.~-
AFS

- 13

- 303

- E May 13, 2013

Exemption No. 13 1M

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2001

- 9519

Maj. Alan W. Myrick

Flight Standards Division

Department of the Air Force

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard

Oklahoma City, OK 73169

Dear Maj . My rick :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption No. 131

, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect , and lists the

conditions and limitations

.

The Basis for Our Decision

On March 19, 2013

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of

the U.S. Air Force ( USAF ) for an extension of Exemption No. 131 , as amended . That

exemption from § 91.159 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the USAF to

conduct its hurricane reconnaissance flights without maintaining the appropriate cruising

alti tudes as prescribed by § 91.159.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that w ere the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register beca use the requested extension of the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any dela y in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the USAF.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 131

, as

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. There fore,

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. § 40109, which the FAA Administrator has

delegated to me, I grant your petition. Notwithstanding the provisions of the exemption, the

pilot of an aircraft engaged in the above operations is not relieved of t he responsibility to see

and avoid other aircraft as required by other provisions of the regulations.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 131 , as amended, to

September 30, 201 6

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName: Jason KulasTitle:  Chief Financial OfficerDate:  September 20, 2013
### §8750. Special agents of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service: authority to execute warrants and make arrests

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of the Navy may authorize any Department of the Navy civilian employee described in subsection (b) to have the same authority to execute and serve warrants and other processes issued under the authority of the United States and to make arrests without a warrant as may be authorized under section 1585a of this title for special agents of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.

(b) Agents To Have Authority.—Subsection (a) applies to any employee of the Department of the Navy who is a special agent of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (or any successor to that service) whose duties include conducting, supervising, or coordinating investigations of criminal activity in programs and operations of the Department of the Navy.

(c) Guidelines for Exercise of Authority.—The authority provided under subsection (a) shall be exercised in accordance with guidelines prescribed by the Secretary of the Navy and approved by the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General and any other applicable guidelines prescribed by the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of Defense, or the Attorney General.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title V, §554(b)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–126, §7480; renumbered §8750, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(6), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8750 was renumbered section 9280 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7480 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2006326EN.01004601.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/46

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 20 November 2006 — FBTO Schadeverzekeringen N.V. v Jack Odenbreit

(Case C-463/06)

(2006/C 326/93)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant and appellant on a point of law: FBTO Schadeverzekeringen N.V.

Defendant and appellant on a point of law:

Applicant and respondent on a point of law: Jack Odenbreit

Applicant and respondent on a point of law:

Question referred

Is the reference in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (1) of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to Article 9(1)(b) of that regulation to be understood as meaning that the injured party may bring an action directly against the insurer in the courts for the place in a Member State where the injured party is domiciled, provided that such a direct action is permitted and the insurer is domiciled in a Member State?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.

1

---
### §944. Effect of confirmation

(a) The provisions of a confirmed plan bind the debtor and any creditor, whether or not—

(1) a proof of such creditor's claim is filed or deemed filed under section 501 of this title;

(2) such claim is allowed under section 502 of this title; or

(3) such creditor has accepted the plan.

(b) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, the debtor is discharged from all debts as of the time when—

(1) the plan is confirmed;

(2) the debtor deposits any consideration to be distributed under the plan with a disbursing agent appointed by the court; and

(3) the court has determined—

(A) that any security so deposited will constitute, after distribution, a valid legal obligation of the debtor; and

(B) that any provision made to pay or secure payment of such obligation is valid.

(c) The debtor is not discharged under subsection (b) of this section from any debt—

(1) excepted from discharge by the plan or order confirming the plan; or

(2) owed to an entity that, before confirmation of the plan, had neither notice nor actual knowledge of the case.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2624.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

[Section 947] Subsection (a) [enacted as section 944(a)] makes the provisions of a confirmed plan binding on the debtor and creditors. It is derived from section 95(a) of chapter 9 [section 415(a) of former title 11].

Subsections (b) and (c) [enacted as section 944(b) and (c)] provide for the discharge of a municipality. The discharge is essentially the same as that granted under section 95(b) of the Bankruptcy Act [section 415(b) of former title 11].
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward L. Pierce, Director, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of BindView Development Corporation (the "Company"), certify that (i) the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and the results of operations of the Company.


By    /s/ EDWARD L. PIERCE
      -------------------------------------
      Edward L. Pierce
      Director, Senior Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
      November 13, 2003



         A signed original of the foregoing certification has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### John Olson and William Olson, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Olson Brothers, Appellants, v. Laura M. Miles, Respondent.

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, jj., concurred.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 87

Electing members of the Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint

Committee of Congress on the Library.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. THOMAS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Electing members of the Joint Committee on Printing and

the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 they are hereby, elected to the following joint committees

3 of Congress, to serve with the chairman of the Committee

4 on House Administration:

5 JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY:

6 Mr. Boehner, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Hoyer, and Mr. Davis of

7 Florida.

8 JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING: Mr. Boehner, Mr.

9 Ney, Mr. Hoyer, and Mr. Fattah.

Æ
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-77 

June 10, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041(a) Termination by Plan Administrator. Filing of Notice of Intent to Terminate

4043(b)(2) Reportable Events. Amendment Decreasing Benefits

4048 Date of Termination 

OPINION: 

 In conversations with staff of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation you have indicated an interest in

withdrawing the Notice of Intent to Terminate filed on December 18, 1975 with respect to the Retirement Plan for * *

* (the "Plan") and instead continuing the Plan as a frozen plan. You have requested the opinion of this office whether

the steps you propose to take to achieve this end are satisfactory and also whether there are any other steps which you

must take. 

If you amend the Plan effective January 1, 1976 to provide for (1) no accrual of benefits after December 31, 1975;

(2) continued accrual of service for vesting purposes only; (3) full vesting for all employees with ten years service; and

(4) continued funding of the Plan in accordance with the minimum funding standard contained in § 412 of the Internal

Revenue Code of 1954 (the "Code"), we would permit a withdrawal of your Notice and would not deem the Plan

terminated. In addition, of course, the amendment should include the other provisions necessary [*2] to maintain the

qualification of the Plan under § 401 of the Code. 

After adoption of the plan amendment, it will be necessary to submit to PBGC a notice of a reportable event under

§ 4043(b)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). A copy of the amendment as

adopted should be submitted with the notice. This notice should be setn to Mr. * * * Pension Benefit Guaranty

Corporation at the above address. 

Finally, please note that premiums will continue to be payable with respect to the Plan pursuant to § 4007 of the

Act. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### §946. Effect of exchange of securities before the date of the filing of the petition

The exchange of a new security under the plan for a claim covered by the plan, whether such exchange occurred before or after the date of the filing of the petition, does not limit or impair the effectiveness of the plan or of any provision of this chapter. The amount and number specified in section 1126(c) of this title include the amount and number of claims formerly held by a creditor that has participated in any such exchange.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2625.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

The House amendment deletes section 950 of the Senate amendment as unnecessary. The constitutionality of chapter 9 of the House amendment is beyond doubt.

#### senate report no. 95–989

[Section 949] This section [enacted as section 946], which follows section 97 of current law [section 417 of former title 11], permits an exchange of a security before the case is filed to constitute an acceptance of the plan if the exchange was under a proposal that later becomes the plan.
§ 36.21 Standard VI—Kindergarten instructional program. ( a ) The curriculum for kindergarten shall provide children with experiences which emphasize language development, native language where necessary as determined by 25 CFR 39.11(g), and performance of the requirements in paragraph (b) of this section. Such programs shall assist children in developing positive feelings toward themselves and others.
( b ) A kindergarten instructional program shall include but not be limited to: ( 1 ) Language (observing, listening, speaking).
( 2 ) Exploration of the environment (number, space and time relationships, natural science).
( 3 ) Psychomotor and socialization development.
( 4 ) Development of imaginative and creative tendencies.
( 5 ) Health education inclusive of the requirements contained in the Act of May 20, 1886, 24 Stat. 69.