alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Trading Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas M. Joyce, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    THOMAS M. JOYCEName: Thomas M. JoyceTitle:   Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:   August 5, 2004




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
bmnm8k05272008ex10-3.htm


    Exhibit
10.3


    ARTICLES
OF AMENDMENT

    OF
BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

    


    Bimini
Capital Management, Inc., a Maryland corporation (which is hereinafter referred
to as the “Corporation”), hereby certifies to the State Department of
Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:

     

    First:  The Articles
of Incorporation of the Corporation are hereby amended as follows:

     

    Article
XIII, Section 9, clause (i) is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:

     

    (i)
Subject to the limitations provided below, the Board of Directors may from time
to time increase or decrease the Ownership Limit and increase or decrease an
Excepted Holder Ownership Limit; provided, however, that any decrease shall only
apply prospectively for stockholders owning more than the decreased Ownership
Limit as of the date of the change (other than a decrease as a result of a
retroactive change in existing law that would require a decrease to retain REIT
status, in which case such decrease shall be effective immediately).
Stockholders owning more than the decreased Ownership Limit as of the date of
the change, but consistent with the prior Ownership Limit, shall be permitted to
retain, but not increase, such percentage, and such Ownership Limit with respect
to such stockholders shall decrease in proportion to any decrease in their
ownership until such time as the stockholder’s ownership reaches the decreased
Ownership Limit.

     

    Second:  This
amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation was advised by the
Board of Directors of the Corporation and approved by the stockholders of the
Corporation as required by Section 2-607 of the Maryland General Corporation
Law.

     

    Third: The undersigned
President of the Corporation acknowledges this amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the
Corporation to be the corporate act of the Corporation and, as to all matters of
fact required to be verified under oath, the undersigned President acknowledges
that, to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, these matters and
facts are true in all material respects and that this statement is made under
the penalties for perjury.

     

    [Signature
page follows.]

     


    
      
        
           

        

         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    





      IN WITNESS WHEREOF: The
Corporation has caused this amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to be
executed in its name and on its behalf by its President and attested by its
Secretary this 27th day of May, 2008.

      


      By:  _/s/ Robert E.
Cauley_

      Name:    Robert
E. Cauley

      Title:      President

      


      


      ATTEST:

      


      


      By:  _/s/ J. Christopher
Clifton__

      Name:     J.
Christopher Clifton

      Title:      Secretary
# C_2006154DE.01003101.xml

| 1.7.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 154/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 154/31

---

Berichtigung zur Mitteilung im Amtsblatt betreffend die Rechtssache T-124/06

(
  „Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union“ C 143 vom 17. Juni 2006, S. 34
  )

(
  „Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union“ C 143 vom 17. Juni 2006, S. 34

(2006/C 154/69)

Die Mitteilung im Amtsblatt betreffend die Rechtssache T-124/06, MIP METRO/HABM — MetroRED Telecom (MetroRED) lautet richtig:

„Klage, eingereicht am 27. April 2006 — MIP METRO/HABM — MetroRED Telecom (MetroRED)

(Rechtssache T-124/06)

(2006/C 000/01)

Sprache der Klageschrift: Englisch

Parteien

Klägerin: MIP METRO Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co KG (Düsseldorf, Deutschland) (Prozessbevollmächtigter: Rechtsanwalt R. Kaase)

Beklagter: Harmonisierungsamt für den Binnenmarkt (Marken, Muster und Modelle)

Andere Beteiligte im Verfahren vor der Beschwerdekammer: MetroRED Telecom Group Ltd (Hamilton, Bermuda)

Anträge der Klägerin

Die Klägerin beantragt,

| — | die Entscheidung der Zweiten Beschwerdekammer vom 16. Februar 2006 aufzuheben, soweit darin die Beschwerde mit der Begründung zurückgewiesen wurde, dass sie nicht mit Artikel 8 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b der Verordnung Nr. 40/94 in Einklang steht; |
| --- | --- |

—

die Entscheidung der Zweiten Beschwerdekammer vom 16. Februar 2006 aufzuheben, soweit darin die Beschwerde mit der Begründung zurückgewiesen wurde, dass sie nicht mit Artikel 8 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b der Verordnung Nr. 40/94 in Einklang steht;

| — | dem Beklagten die Kosten aufzuerlegen. |
| --- | --- |

—

dem Beklagten die Kosten aufzuerlegen.

Klagegründe und wesentliche Argumente

Anmelderin der Gemeinschaftsmarke: MetroRED Telecom Group Ltd.

Betroffene Gemeinschaftsmarke: Bildmarke ‚MetroRED‘ für Dienstleistungen der Klassen 35, 38 und 42 — Anmeldung Nr. 2 189 512.

Inhaberin des im Widerspruchsverfahren entgegengehaltenen Marken- oder Zeichenrechts: Klägerin.

Entgegengehaltenes Marken- oder Zeichenrecht: Nationale Bildmarke ‚Metro‘ für Waren und Dienstleistungen der Klassen 1 bis 36 und 38 bis 42.

Entscheidung der Widerspruchsabteilung: Teilweise Zurückweisung des Widerspruchs.

Entscheidung der Beschwerdekammer: Teilweise Zurückweisung der Beschwerde.

Klagegründe: Verstoß gegen Artikel 8 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b der Verordnung Nr. 40/94 des Rates, denn es bestehe deshalb Verwechslungsgefahr, weil die Marke ‚MetroRED‘ vom Element ‚Metro‘ geprägt sei, das mit der Widerspruchsmarke identisch sei. Außerdem habe der weitere Markenbestandteil ‚RED‘ keine Unterscheidungskraft und werde deshalb vom Verbraucher außer Betracht gelassen werden.“

---
§ 584.1 What does this part cover? ( a ) This part applies to appeals of the following where the appellant elects a hearing before a presiding official: ( 1 ) Violation(s) alleged in a notice of violation under § 573.3 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Proposed civil fine assessments under part 575 of this chapter;
( 3 ) Orders of temporary closure under § 573.4 of this chapter;
( 4 ) The Chair's decision to void or modify a management contract under part 535 of this chapter subsequent to initial approval;
( 5 ) The Commission's proposal to remove a certificate of self-regulation under part 518 of this chapter; and
( 6 ) The Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission's minimum internal control standards under part 543 of this chapter;
( 7 ) The Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission's technical standards under part 547 of this chapter; and
( 8 ) Late fee notifications and assessments under part 514 of this chapter.
( b ) Appeals identified in paragraph (a) of this section brought directly before the Commission on the written record and without a hearing are filed pursuant to part 585 of this subchapter.
[77 FR 58945, Sept. 25, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 21062, Apr. 9, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TOWNE SERVICES, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,962,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,469,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (406,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,728,000
<PP&E>                                       6,722,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,220,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,787,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,807,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    53,920,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (27,178,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,787,000
<SALES>                                      7,493,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,493,000
<CGS>                                        1,520,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,224,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (72,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,659,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (114,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,545,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,545,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.07)


</TABLE>
# C_2006294EN.01003802.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/38

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-123/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/77)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.04.2006.

1

---
### [§376. Renumbered §276]
### §7626. Aircraft supplies and services: foreign military or air attaché

Under such conditions as he may prescribe, the Secretary of the Army may provide for the sale of fuel, oil, and other supplies for use in aircraft operated by a foreign military or air attaché accredited to the United States, and for the furnishing of mechanical service and other assistance to such aircraft. Shelter may be furnished to such aircraft, but only without charge.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 259, §4626; renumbered §7626, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4626 | 22:259 (less last sentence). | May 31, 1939, ch. 161 (less last sentence), 53 Stat. 795. |

The last sentence is substituted for the words "except for shelter for which no charge shall be made". The words "and equipment" are omitted as covered by the word "supplies". 22:259 (last 22 words of 2d sentence) is omitted to reflect Title IV of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended (63 Stat. 585), which authorized the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations governing the use and sale of certain inventories at cost, including applicable administrative expenses. (See opinion of the Assistant General Counsel (Fiscal Matters) of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, January 4, 1955.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4626 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Residential Water Heater

Efficiency Standards

Terry Logee

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Codes and Standards

November 9, 1998 Introduction

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38CC
Objectives

* Discuss Manufacturing Cost Data

* Walk through Analysis Methodologies

* Present Preliminary Results

* These Analyses & Revised Results will be

used in a Proposed Rule

* Understand Your Comments

November 9, 1998 Introduction 2

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38CC
Water Heater Status

* Amended GAMA data received October

20th

* Today, preliminary LCC and Engineering

results will be presented

* Comments on Workshop by December 1 1th

* Will revise the Engineering and LCC

analyses

November 9, 1998 Introduction 3

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38CC
Water Heater Schedule

* Manufacturing Interviews, February '99

through April '99

* Draft TSD - May'99

* Final TSD - August '99

* Publish NOPR - November'99

November 9, 1998 Introduction 4

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38CC
Analysis Approach

* Design Option Approach

* Engineering Analysis based on DOE Test

Procedure & Average Costs

* New Methodology Accounts for Data

Distributions for LCC

November 9, 1998 Introduction 5

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38CC
§ 216.10 Inspection: Notice of noncompliance: Revocation. ( a ) The mining supervisor and superintendent shall have the right to enter upon the lands under a permit or lease, at any reasonable time, for the purpose of inspection or investigation to determine whether the terms and conditions of the permit or lease and the requirements of the exploration or mining plan have been complied with.
( b ) If the mining supervisor determines that an operator has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of a permit or lease, or with the requirements of an exploration or mining plan, or with the provisions of applicable regulations, the superintendent shall serve a notice of noncompliance upon the operator by delivery in person to him or his agent or by certified or registered mail addressed to the operator at his last known address.
( c ) A notice of noncompliance shall specify in what respects the operator has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of a permit or lease or the requirements of an exploration or mining plan, or the provisions of applicable regulations, and shall specify the action which must be taken to correct the noncompliance and the time limits within which such action must be taken.
( d ) Failure of the operator to take action in accordance with the notice of noncompliance shall be grounds for suspension by the mining supervisor of operations or for the initiation of action for the cancellation of the permit or lease and for forfeiture of the surety bond required under § 216.8.
8 

U 

Y Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 6 1200 K Sheet, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005-4026 

FEB 0 4 2004 

Re: case 191T84; Marshall and ~illiams Company Salaried 

Employees Pension Plan ("Plan") 

~earrl 

Bm~ COPY AVmmLE 

The Appeals Board has reviewed your appeal of PBGC's August 18,2003 determination that 

you had only h*;o.years of setvice when the Plan terminated on November 19,1999. For the reasons 

explained below, the Appeals Board changed PBGC's determination by finding that your benefit 

service includes your 1967 - 1976 employment and military service. PBGC's Insurance Operations 

Department, the organization responsible for determining and paying PBGC benefits, will send you 

a new determination. 

Your September 15,2003 appeal said youbelieve PBGC's determination is incorrect because 

it does not take into account your salaried employment with the Company between January 1967 and 

September 1976. You explained that you began employment with Marshall and Williams as a 

salaried employee on January 16,1967, entered active military service in June of 1967, rehuned to 

the Company on June 9,1969, and remained in the Company's employ as a salaried employee until 

September 10, 1976. YOU further stated that, afler a break of almost 21 years, you returned to 

Marshall and Williams as a salaried employee on May 12, 1997, and remained as such until 

November 12, 1999. You said PBGC's determination apparently is based only your employment 

after you were rehired in 1997. 

The Plan document in effect on the Plan's November 19,1999 termination date is the Plan 

as amended and restated effective January 1, 1989. This Plan states: "The rights of any Employee 

or Participant who separated from the Employer's service prior to [January 1, 19891 shall be 

esjablished under the terms of the Plan and Trust as in effect at the time of his separation, unless he 

subsequent[y returns to service with the Employer." [Emphasis added.] 

Since you returned to work with the Company in 1997, the provisions of the 1989 Plan apply 

to you. Under Plan section 2.1, an employee who returns to employment after a break in service 

shall retain credit for his pre-break years of service if he is vested at the time of the break. 
-2: 

Section 4.5 provides that a participant is 100% vested after 5 years of service. Thus, because you 

had at least 5 years of service when you left the Company in 1976, you are entitled to receive credit 

for your pre-break employment. You also receive pension credit for your 1967 - 1969 military 

service. Accordingly, the Appeals Board found that your service from January 16, 1967 through 

September 9,1976 is to be used in calculating your Plan benefit. 

PBGC's Insurance ~~erations ~Gartment will receive a copy of this letter and they will issue 

you anew determination, with a new 45-day appeal right. We appreciate your patience while PBGC 

completes the processing of your case. Meanwhile, if yo" need other information hm PBGC, 

please call our Customer Contact Center at 1-800-400-7242. 

Sincerely, 

Sherline M. Brickus 

Member, ~~~eals Board 

BEST COPY AVWm
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11


                        BINDVIEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNING PER SHARE

                                  (UNAUDITED)
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     QUARTER                 SIX MONTHS
                                                                  ENDED JUNE 30,           ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                               -------------------      -------------------
                                                                 1998        1997         1998        1997
                                                               -------     -------      -------     -------
<S>                                                            <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>
Pro forma net income                                           $    805    $   414      $ 1,202     $   894
                                                               ========    =======      =======     =======

Shares used in basis calculation
        Total basic shares                                        8,391       8,228       8,333       8,228

Additional shares for diluted computation:
  Effect of stock options                                         2,679         411       2,405         527
  Effect of warrants                                                512          --         523          --
  Effect of convertible preferred stock                           6,320          --       6,320          --
  Effect of phantom stock                                            --       5,800          --       5,800
                                                               --------     -------     -------     -------
        Total diluted shares                                     17,902      14,439      17,581      14,555
                                                               ========     =======     =======     =======
Earnings per common share
  Basic                                                        $   0.10    $   0.05     $  0.14     $  0.11
  Diluted                                                      $   0.04    $   0.03     $  0.07     $  0.06

</TABLE>
### §3846. [Reserved]

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1835(e)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4241; amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(i)(7)(B)(ii), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2142.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3846, added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(94), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1484, related to transfer or discharge of reserve first lieutenants, captains, and majors not recommended for promotion by two selection boards, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §§1629(a)(3), 1691(b)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2963, 3026, effective Oct. 1, 1996. See section 14501 et seq. of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, §1701(i)(7)(B)(ii), amended Pub. L. 116–283, §1835(e)(1), which enacted this section, by adding section 3846 designation and catchline "[Reserved]" and striking out former section 3846 designation and catchline "Defense Contract Audit Agency: legal resources and expertise".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment made to Pub. L. 116–283 by Pub. L. 117–81, resulting in omission of this section, applicable as if included in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and Effective Date note below.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.