alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 33.3



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO                 |  |  |  |  |  | Glen A. Messina President and CEO  Tel: (856)
917-6847 Fax: (856) 917-6145
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|3000 Leadenhall Road |  |  |  |  |  | glen.messina@phh.com                                                      
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | www.phh.com                                                               
|Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                           





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB

SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the Asserting Party) is
responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the
Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it
performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(vii), (d)(4)(viii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR
are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes responsibility for compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all
non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as servicer (the Platform).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded
that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set
forth in this assertion.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|PHH Mortgage Corporation              
|                                      
|Date: February 26, 2015               
|                                      
|/s/ Glen A. Messina                   
|Glen A. Messina                       
|President                             
|                                      
|/s/ Martin L. Foster                  
|Martin L. Foster                      
|Senior Vice President  Loan Servicing
### **CHAPTER 4—TAXATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS

Sec.
531.
Exemption from taxation.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL BANK CIRCULATION

541.
Tax on circulating notes generally.
542 to 547. Omitted or Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL BANK SHARES

548.
State taxation.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—STATE BANK CIRCULATION

561 to 570. Omitted.
### [§2248. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X, §1045(a)(5)(A), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1612]

Section, added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title X, §1063(a), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2848, related to prohibition on purchase of surety bonds.
### §1074c. Medical care: authority to provide a wig

A person entitled to medical care under this chapter who has alopecia resulting from the treatment of a malignant disease may be furnished a wig if the person has not previously been furnished one at the expense of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 98–525, title XIV, §1401(e)(2)(A), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2616, §1074b; renumbered §1074c, Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VI, §640(a)(1), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1385.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(h) [title VIII, §8033], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1904, 1929.

Pub. L. 98–212, title VII, §739, Dec. 8, 1983, 97 Stat. 1445.

Pub. L. 97–377, title I, §101(c) [title VII, §742], Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1833, 1858.

Pub. L. 97–114, title VII, §743, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1586.

Pub. L. 96–527, title VII, §744, Dec. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 3089.

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–190 renumbered section 1074b of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 1404 of Pub. L. 98–525, set out as a note under section 520b of this title.
#### § 226.12 Government reserves right to purchase oil.

Any of the executive departments of the U.S. Government shall have the option to purchase all or any part of the oil produced from any lease at not less than the highest posted price as defined in § 226.11.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           RENAISSANCE MEDIA GROUP LLC
                        RENAISSANCE MEDIA (LOUISIANA) LLC
                        RENAISSANCE MEDIA (TENNESSEE) LLC
                      RENAISSANCE MEDIA CAPITAL CORPORATION
                             12405 POWERSCOURT DRIVE
                               ST. LOUIS, MO 63131

                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
                  OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     I, Carl E. Vogel, the Chief Executive Officer of Renaissance Media Group
LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and
Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (collectively, the "Company") in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

     -    fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     -    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                              /s/ Carl E. Vogel
                                              -----------------
                                              Carl E. Vogel
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              May 14, 2003
### Part A—Funding
Exhibit
99.6



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Pembina Pipeline Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, M.H.
Dilger, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The
                                         information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
                                         financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    February
26, 2015



| | /s/ M.H. Dilger                    
| | -----------------------------------
| | M.H. Dilger                        
| | President & Chief Executive Officer
§ 115.426 What is the BIA's responsibility regarding the management of a minor's supervised account? The BIA's responsibility in regard to the management of a minor's supervised account is to: ( a ) Review and approve the evaluation and the distribution plan;
( b ) Authorize OTFM to disburse IIM funds in accordance with an approved distribution plan; and
( c ) Conduct annual reviews of case records for minors' supervised accounts to ensure that the social service providers have managed the accounts in accordance with the approved evaluation and distribution plan.
### §8168. Consular powers: senior officer present afloat

In any foreign port where there is no resident consul of the United States, or on the high seas, the senior officer present afloat has the powers of a consul in relation to mariners of the United States.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 372, §5948; renumbered §8168, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5948 | 34 U.S.C. 217. | R.S. 1433. |

The words "the senior officer present afloat" are substituted for the words "The commanding officer of any fleet, squadron, or vessel acting singly". At the time of enactment of the Revised Statutes, the word "squadron" meant any number of vessels more than one. Today the concept of "senior officer present afloat" covers as nearly as possible the current equivalent of the original statute.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5948 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 35.1 

{00037221.DOC}

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

Re:  Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, in its capacity as Servicer (the "Servicer") under the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2009, among Daimler Trust, as Titling Trust, Daimler Title Co., as Collateral Agent, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Lender and as Servicer (the "Servicing Agreement"), and under the 2012-A Servicing Supplement, dated as of March 1, 2012, among the same parties (the "Servicing Supplement") for the period from March 22, 2012, to December 31, 2012 (the "Reporting Period") 

I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 

(a) 

A review of the Servicer's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement has been made under my supervision. 

(b) 

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

Dated:  March 26, 2013 

/s/   Brian T. Stevens

Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 103 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 11, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 42) regarding the use of United States Armed 
Forces as part of a NATO peacekeeping operation implementing a Kosovo peace 
agreement. The first reading of the concurrent resolution shall be dispensed 
with. General debate shall be confined to the concurrent resolution and shall 
not exceed two hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on International Relations. After general 
debate the concurrent resolution shall be considered for amendment under the 
five-minute rule. The concurrent resolution shall be considered as read. No 
amendment to the concurrent resolution shall be in order except those printed in 
the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 
of rule XVIII and except pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each 
amendment so printed may be offered only by the Member who caused it to be 
printed or his designee and shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the concurrent resolution for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the concurrent resolution to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the concurrent resolution to final adoption without intervening motion except 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### [§520a. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1076(g)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–282]

Section, added Pub. L. 97–252, title XI, §1114(c)(1), Sept. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 749; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1502(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774, related to criminal history information for military recruiting purposes.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM EARL WADE, Jr.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

PAUL PENZONE, Maricopa County Sheriff; KINDELL HOUSE, B3914, Supervisor Inmate Legal Services at 4th Avenue Jail; B. PIIRIMEN, External Referee at M.C.S.O.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 16412

D.C. No. 2:20

- cv

- 00694

- SPL

- JFM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022 * *

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LE E , Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner William Earl Wa d e, Jr., ap peals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C

. § 1983 action alleging various

constitutional claims

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 16412

novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A

. Resnick v.

Hayes , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and

remand

.

The district court properly dismissed Wade’s constitutional claims related to

defendant Piirimen’s failure to forward Wade’s grievance to the next le vel because

Wade failed to allege facts sufficient to state a claim. See Hebbe v. Pliler , 627

F.3d 338, 341

- 42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed liberally,

a plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to state a claim); Ramirez v. Galaz a , 334

F.3d 850, 860 (9th Cir. 2003) ( “[I] n mates lack a separate constitutional entitlement

to a specific prison grievance procedure [

. ] ”).

The district court dismissed Wade’s constitutional claims regarding his

outgoing legal mail for failure to state a plausible claim. However, i n the first

amended complaint, Wade alleged that prison official s held and read his outgoing

legal mail

. Liberal ly construed, these allegations “are sufficient to warrant

ordering [defendants] to file an answer.” Wilhelm v. Rotman , 680 F.3d 1113, 1116

(9th Cir. 2016) ; see also Witherow v. Paff

, 52 F.3d 264, 265 (9th Cir. 1995)

(discussing prisoners ’ First Amendment right to send and receive mail)

. We

reverse the judgment in part and remand for further proceedings on these claims

only.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V
                                Exhibit 32.1
                                ------------
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Swanson,  Chief Executive Officer of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust V.
(the "Registrant"),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 16, 2004

                                       Signature:

                                       /s/ Robert Swanson
                                       -----------------------
                                       Robert Swanson
                                       Chief Executive Officer
#### § 580.10 Is the Commission's decision a final agency action?

The Commission's final decision is a final agency action for purposes of judicial review.
# CA2006252EN.01000701.xml

| 18.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 252/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 252/7

---

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/9/05

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/9/05

ASSISTANTS (AST 3)

ASSISTANTS (AST 3)

IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

(Irish language)

(2006/C 252 A/04)

| Chairman: | Per HØJ |
| --- | --- |
| Alternate chairman: | Brian KILLEEN |
| Full members: | Oliver BRENNAN |
| | Louis-Claude CARRAZ |

Chairman:

Per HØJ

Alternate chairman:

Brian KILLEEN

Full members:

Oliver BRENNAN

Louis-Claude CARRAZ

---
### [§2329. Renumbered §4506]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2329, added Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VIII, §810(a)(1), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1130; amended Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1233(j), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2058; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, §904(d)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1728, related to contract terms and conditions for production special tooling and production special test equipment, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1506(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3298.
### §456. Civil actions barred

No civil action may be brought against the United States on the basis of the content of geospatial information prepared or disseminated by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title X, §1074(b), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2861, §2798; renumbered §456 and amended Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XI, §1112(b), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2682; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IX, §921(d)(2)(A), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1568; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVI, §1621(e), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4053.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 added text of section and struck out former text which read as follows:

"(a) Claims Barred.—No civil action may be brought against the United States on the basis of the content of a navigational aid prepared or disseminated by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

"(b) Navigational Aids Covered.—Subsection (a) applies with respect to a navigational aid in the form of a map, a chart, or a publication and any other form or medium of product or information in which the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency prepares or disseminates navigational aids."

2003—Pub. L. 108–136 substituted "National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency" for "National Imagery and Mapping Agency" wherever appearing.

1996—Pub. L. 104–201 renumbered section 2798 of this title as this section and substituted "National Imagery and Mapping Agency" for "Defense Mapping Agency" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–201 effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1124 of Pub. L. 104–201, set out as a note under section 193 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title X, §1074(d), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2861, provided that: "Section 2798 [now 456] of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (b), shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 1994] and shall apply with respect to (1) civil actions brought before such date that are pending adjudication on such date, and (2) civil actions brought on or after such date."
### Part C—Rights of Borrowers; Loan Restructuring

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–233, title VIII, §804(b), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1715, substituted "Rights of Borrowers; Loan Restructuring" for "Rights of Applicants" as part C heading.