42294 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) Part 71 by modifying Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at McNary Field 

Airport, Salem, OR. On March 8, 2016 

a Final Rule was published modifying 

the airspace at McNary Field, Salem, OR 

(81FR 12002). A comment was received 

on May 10, 2016 questioning the safety 

of the LOC/DME BC RWY 13 approach. 

The FAA concurred that the presence of 

terrain in the procedure turn transition 

airspace increased the risk to IFR 

operations into McNary Field, Salem, 

OR. A Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) was 

issued advising pilots this approach was 

non-available pending the outcome of 

this proposal. After a review of the 

airspace, the FAA identified that the 

approach to runway 31 also was not 

fully contained in controlled airspace 

and would also be modified by this 

proposal. The Class E airspace 

extending upward from 700 feet above 

the surface would be modified by 

adding segments extending from the 6.7- 

mile radius to 13.50 miles northwest of 

the airport, and extending from the 8.2- 

mile radius to 16.5 miles southeast of 

the airport. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.9Z, dated August 6, 2015, 

and effective September 15, 2015, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 6, 2015, and 

effective September 15, 2015, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ANM OR E5 Salem, OR [Modified] 

Salem, McNary Field, OR 

(Lat. 44°54′34′′ N., long. 123°00′09′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.2-mile 

radius of McNary Field from the 168° bearing 

from the airport clockwise to the 311° 

bearing, and that airspace within a 6.7-mile 

radius of McNary Field from the 311° bearing 

from the airport clockwise to the 074° 

bearing, and that airspace within an 8.2-mile 

radius of McNary Field from the 074° bearing 

from the airport clockwise to the 168° bearing 

from the airport, and that airspace 2 miles 

either side of the 330° bearing extending from 

the 6.7-mile radius 13.5 miles northwest of 

the airport and that airspace 4 miles 

southwest and 5 miles northeast of the 150° 

bearing extending from the 8.2-mile radius 

16.5 miles southeast of the airport. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 21, 

2016. 

Tracey Johnson, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Western 

Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2016–15266 Filed 6–28–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0303; FRL–9948–12– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; State of 

Kansas; Cross-State Air Pollution Rule 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

December 1, 2015, State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) submittal from Kansas 

concerning allocations of Cross-State 

Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) emission 

allowances. Under CSAPR, large 

electricity generating units in Kansas are 

subject to a Federal Implementation 

Plan (FIP) requiring the units to 

participate in CSAPR’s Federal trading 

program for annual emissions of 

nitrogen oxides (NOX). This action 

would approve Kansas’ adoption into its 

SIP of state regulations establishing 

state-determined allocations to replace 

EPA’s default allocations to Kansas 

units of CSAPR allowances for annual 

NOX emissions for 2017 through 2019. 

EPA is proposing to approve the SIP 

revision because it meets the 

requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) 

and EPA’s regulations for approval of an 

abbreviated SIP revision replacing 

EPA’s default allocations of CSAPR 

emission allowances with statedetermined allocations. Approval of this 

SIP revision would not alter any 

provision of CSAPR’s Federal trading 

program for annual NOX emissions as 

applied to Kansas units other than the 

allowance allocation provisions, and the 

FIP requiring the units to participate in 

the trading program (as modified by the 

SIP revision) would remain in place. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

July 29, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2016–0303, to http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules 42295 

1Federal Implementation Plans; Interstate 

Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and 

Correction of SIP Approvals, 76 FR 48208 (August 

8, 2011), (codified as amended at 40 CFR 52.38 and 

52.39 and subparts AAAAA through DDDDD of 40 

CFR part 97). 

2EPA has proposed to replace the terms 

‘‘Transport Rule’’ and ‘‘TR’’ in the text of the Code 

of Federal Regulations with the updated terms 

‘‘Cross-State Air Pollution Rule’’ and ‘‘CSAPR.’’ 80 

FR 75706, 75759 (December 3, 2015). EPA uses the 

updated terms here. 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Larry Gonzalez, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, Air and Waste 

Management Division, EPA Region 7, 

11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 

66219; telephone number: (913) 551– 

7041; email address: gonzalez.larry@

epa.gov 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document proposes to take action on a 

revision to the SIP for Kansas 

concerning allocations of allowances 

used in the Cross-State Air Pollution 

Rule (CSAPR) 1 Federal trading program 

for annual emissions of nitrogen oxides 

(NOX). We have published a direct final 

rule approving the State’s SIP revision 

(s) in the Rules and Regulations section 

of this Federal Register, because we 

view this as a noncontroversial action 

and anticipate no relevant adverse 

comment. We have explained our 

reasons for this action in the preamble 

to the direct final rule. If we receive no 

adverse comment, we will not take 

further action on this proposed rule. If 

we receive adverse comment, we will 

withdraw the direct final rule and it will 

not take effect. We would address all 

public comments in any subsequent 

final rule based on this proposed rule. 

We do not intend to institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. For further 

information, please see the information 

provided in the ADDRESSES section of 

this document. 

Large electricity generating units in 

Kansas are subject to a CSAPR Federal 

Implementation Plan (FIP) that requires 

the units to participate in the Federal 

CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program.2

Each of CSAPR’s Federal trading 

programs includes default provisions 

governing the allocation among 

participating units of emission 

allowances used for compliance under 

that program. CSAPR also provides a 

process for the submission and approval 

of SIP revisions to replace EPA’s default 

allocations with state-determined 

allocations. 

The SIP revision approved in the 

direct final rule incorporates into 

Kansas’s SIP state regulations 

establishing state-determined allowance 

allocations to replace EPA’s default 

allocations to Kansas units of CSAPR 

NOX Annual allowances issued for the 

control periods in 2017 through 2019. 

EPA is approving the SIP revision 

because it meets the requirements of the 

CAA and EPA’s regulations for approval 

of an abbreviated SIP revision replacing 

EPA’s default allocations of CSAPR 

emission allowances with statedetermined allocations. Approval of the 

SIP revision does not alter any provision 

of the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading 

Program as applied to Kansas units 

other than the allowance allocation 

provisions, and the FIP requiring the 

units to participate in that program (as 

modified by the SIP revision) remains in 

place. Because the SIP revision 

addresses only the control periods in 

2017 through 2019, absent submission 

and approval of a further SIP revision, 

allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual 

allowances for control periods in 2020 

and later years will be made pursuant to 

the default allocation provisions. 

Large electricity generating units in 

Kansas are also subject to an additional 

CSAPR FIP requiring them to participate 

in the Federal CSAPR SO2 Group 2 

Trading Program. Kansas’ SIP submittal 

does not seek to replace the default 

allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 2 

allowances to Kansas units. Approval of 

this SIP revision concerning another 

CSAPR trading program has no effect on 

the CSAPR SO2 Group 2 Trading 

Program as applied to Kansas units, and 

the FIP requiring the units to participate 

in that program remains in place. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: June 16, 2016. 

Mark Hague, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 2016–15039 Filed 6–28–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 660 

[Docket No. 150902809–6536–01] 

RIN 0648–BF12 

Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; 

Fisheries Off West Coast States; 

Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; 

Widow Rockfish Reallocation in the 

Individual Fishing Quota Fishery 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In January 2011, NMFS 

implemented the trawl rationalization 

program, a type of catch share program, 

for the Pacific coast groundfish fishery’s 

limited entry trawl fleet, which includes 

an individual fishing quota program for 

limited entry trawl participants. At the 

time of implementation, the widow 

rockfish stock was overfished and quota 

shares were allocated to quota share 

permit owners in the individual fishing 

quota program using an overfished 

species formula. Now that the widow 

rockfish stock has been rebuilt, NMFS 

proposes to reallocate quota shares to 

initial recipients based on a target 

species formula that will more closely 

represent the fishing history of permit 

owners when widow rockfish was a 

targeted species. Through this rule, 

NMFS also proposes to allow the 

trading of widow rockfish quota shares, 

set a deadline for divestiture in case the 

reallocation of widow rockfish puts any 

QS permit owner over an accumulation 

limit, and remove the daily vessel limit 

for widow rockfish since it is no longer 

an overfished species. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule 

must be received on or before July 29, 

2016. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

on this document, identified by NOAA– 

NMFS–2016–0037, by any of the 

following methods: 

• Electronic Submission: Submit all 

electronic public comments via the 

Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS