alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1204. Removal of debtor as debtor in possession

(a) On request of a party in interest, and after notice and a hearing, the court shall order that the debtor shall not be a debtor in possession for cause, including fraud, dishonesty, incompetence, or gross mismanagement of the affairs of the debtor, either before or after the commencement of the case.

(b) On request of a party in interest, and after notice and a hearing, the court may reinstate the debtor in possession.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 99–554, title II, §255, title III, §302(f), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3107, 3124; Pub. L. 103–65, §1, Aug. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 311; Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title I, §149(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–610; Pub. L. 106–5, §1(1), (2), Mar. 30, 1999, 113 Stat. 9; Pub. L. 106–70, §1, Oct. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1031; Pub. L. 107–8, §1, May 11, 2001, 115 Stat. 10; Pub. L. 107–17, §1, June 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 151; Pub. L. 107–170, §1, May 7, 2002, 116 Stat. 133; Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10814(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 532; Pub. L. 107–377, §2(a), Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3115; Pub. L. 108–73, §2(a), Aug. 15, 2003, 117 Stat. 891; Pub. L. 108–369, §2(a), Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1749; Pub. L. 109–8, title X, §1001(a)(1), (c), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 185, 186.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

For repeal of section effective Oct. 1, 1998, and subsequent reenactment of section, see note set out preceding section 1201 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Dates

Permanent reenactment of section effective July 1, 2005, see section 1001(a)(2) of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a Repeal, Reenactment, and Termination of Chapter note under section 1201 of this title. For effective dates of section and amendments extending periods for which section was reenacted prior to permanent reenactment, see Effective Date and Effective Date of 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Amendment notes set out under section 1201 of this title.
# DATA BOOK LISTING

2017 Data Tables
https://www.pbgc.gov/prac/data-bookshttps://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/2016-single-employer-guaranty-study.pdf

# LISTING (Continued)

2017 Data Tables
https://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/2017-multiemployer-administrative-expense-supplement.pdfhttps://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/orphan-and-inactive-participant-report-final.pdf

# Overview

2017 Data Tables
http://www.pbgc.gov/prac/data-books.html

# GLANCE

2017 Data Tables

# S-1

2017 Data Tables

# S-2

2017 Data Tables

# S-3

2017 Data Tables

# S-4

2017 Data Tables

# S-5

2017 Data Tables

# S-6

2017 Data Tables

# S-7

2017 Data Tables

# S-8

2017 Data Tables

# S-9

2017 Data Tables

# S-10

2017 Data Tables

# S-11

2017 Data Tables

# S-12

2017 Data Tables

# S-13

2017 Data Tables

# S-14

2017 Data Tables

# S-15

2017 Data Tables

# S-16

2017 Data Tables

# S-17

2017 Data Tables

# S-18

2017 Data Tables

# S-19

2017 Data Tables

# S-20

2017 Data Tables

# S-21

2017 Data Tables

# S-22

2017 Data Tables

# S-23

2017 Data Tables

# S-24

2017 Data Tables

# S-25

2017 Data Tables

# S-26

2017 Data Tables

# S-27

2017 Data Tables

# S-28

2017 Data Tables

# S-29

2017 Data Tables

# S-30

2017 Data Tables

# S-31

2017 Data Tables

# S-32

2017 Data Tables

# S-33

2017 Data Tables

# S-34

2017 Data Tables

# S-35

2017 Data Tables

# S-36

2017 Data Tables

# S-37 

2017 Data Tables

# S-38

2017 Data Tables

# S-39

2017 Data Tables

# S-40

2017 Data Tables

# S-41

2017 Data Tables

# S-42

2017 Data Tables

# S-43

2017 Data Tables

# S-44

2017 Data Tables

# S-45

2017 Data Tables

# S-46

2017 Data Tables

# S-47

2017 Data Tables

# S-48

2017 Data Tables

# S-49

2017 Data Tables

# S-50

2017 Data Tables

# S-51

2017 Data Tables

# S-51(c)

2017 Data Tables

# S-52

2017 Data Tables

# S-53

2017 Data Tables

# M-1

2017 Data Tables

# M-2

2017 Data Tables

# M-3

2017 Data Tables

# M-4

2017 Data Tables

# M-5

2017 Data Tables

# M-6

2017 Data Tables

# M-7

2017 Data Tables

# M-8

2017 Data Tables

# M-9

2017 Data Tables

# M-10

2017 Data Tables

# M-11

2017 Data Tables

# M-12

2017 Data Tables

# M-13

2017 Data Tables

# M-14

2017 Data Tables

# M-15

2017 Data Tables

# M-16

2017 Data Tables

# M-17

2017 Data Tables

# M-18

2017 Data Tables

# M-19

2017 Data Tables

# M-20

2017 Data Tables
Part II, Section A. 1(d) NCS TS-11KK6F MANUFACTURING 

## Redacted
### [§2518. Renumbered §4834]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2518 was renumbered section 2522 of this title and subsequently repealed.
§ 225.23 Economic assessments. The Secretary shall prepare or cause to be prepared an economic assessment that shall address, among other things: ( a ) Whether there are assurances in the minerals agreement that operations shall be conducted with appropriate diligence;
( b ) Whether the production royalties or other form of return on mineral resources is adequate; and
( c ) Whether the minerals agreement is likely to provide the Indian mineral owner with a return on the production comparable to what the owner might otherwise obtain through competitive bidding, when such a comparison can reasonably be made.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 27

Congratulating the people of the Republic of Venezuela on the success of

their democratic elections held on December 6, 1998.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. GALLEGLY submitted the following resolution; which was International

Relations

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the people of the Republic of Venezuela on

the success of their democratic elections held on December 6, 1998.

Whereas on December 6, 1998, the people of the Republic of

Venezuela held truly democratic multiparty elections to

choose their government;

Whereas these elections were deemed by international and domestic observers to be free and fair and a legitimate expression of the will of the people of the Republic of Venezuela;

Whereas in February 1999, Hugo Chavez will be sworn in to

the office of President of the Republic of Venezuela and

has promised to continue the path of democracy, national

reconciliation, and reconstruction; and
2

•HRES 27 IH

Whereas these democratic elections in the Republic of Venezuela and the inauguration of President Hugo Chavez

should be honored: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of

3 Venezuela for the successful completion of the demo4 cratic multiparty elections held on December 6,

5 1998;

6 (2) congratulates President Hugo Chavez for

7 his election victory and his commitment to a strong

8 democracy, which will help him achieve political and

9 economic change in the Republic of Venezuela;

10 (3) recognizes that all Venezuelans should con11 tinue to work together in order to ensure a strong

12 and stable democracy, respect for human rights, a

13 free and market-oriented economy, and social justice

14 and economic prosperity for all people;

15 (4) reaffirms the commitment of the United

16 States to help the Republic of Venezuela move to17 ward a stronger democracy, economic growth, and

18 social justice for all; and

19 (5) further reaffirms that the United States is

20 strongly committed to encouraging democracy, eco21 nomic growth, and peaceful development throughout

22 the Western Hemisphere.

Æ
§ 36.11 Standard II—Administrative requirements. ( a ) *Staffing.* Each school shall, at a minimum, meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The overall school ratio of regular program students to regular program teachers in self-contained classrooms shall not exceed the following except under the conditions set forth in paragraphs (a)(4) (i) and (ii) of this section. Average daily membership (ADM) shall be used in meeting the following ratios. Level
Ratio Kindergarten
20:1 1st grade—3rd grade
22:1 4th grade—high school
25:1
( 2 ) Multi-grade classrooms that cross grade-level boundaries (e.g., K-1, 3-4, etc.) shall use the maximum of the lower grade. In grades K-8, grades shall be consolidated to meet the teacher ratios listed above.
( 3 ) The daily teaching load per teacher in departmentalized classes shall not exceed 150 students (ADM) except in activity type classes such as music and physical education.
( 4 ) Schools exceeding these specific staffing ratios for over 30 consecutive days during one school year shall submit a justification for a request for a waiver to the Director, through the Agency Superintendent for Education or Area Education Programs Administrator, as appropriate, which may be approved for a period not to exceed one school year and for the following reasons: ( i ) Additional classroom space is not available for establishing another class; or
( ii ) The school, Agency, Area and Office of Indian Education Programs Applicant Supply File has been exhausted and the required teacher position cannot be filled. However, efforts to fill the vacancy shall be continued.
( 5 ) Each school shall provide, in the absence of a regular teacher, a certified substitute teacher who meets the State substitute teacher qualifications. In the event that such a substitute is not available, coverage will be provided by a school employee designated by the school supervisor. A class cannot have as a teacher an employee without teaching credentials for more than 20 school days during any one school year.
( b ) *Written school enrollment and attendance policies.* Each school shall have written school enrollment and attendance policies in compliance with and/or consistent with 25 CFR 31, Federal Schools for Indians, the statutes of the State, and tribal education ordinances.
( c ) *Immunization.* School children shall be immunized in accordance with the regulations and requirements of the state in which they attend school or standards of the Indian Health Service.
[50 FR 36816, Sept. 9, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 61765, Dec. 1, 1994; 70 FR 21951, Apr. 28, 2005]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Tolentino, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 672]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered March 3, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of *V-fa*to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s argument for a sentence reduction under the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738) is without merit *(People v Utsey,*7 NY3d 398 [2006]). Concur—Friedman, J.E, Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
### [§155a. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(a)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2102]

Section, added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title V, §511(a), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1717, related to Assistants to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for National Guard matters and Reserve matters.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those formerly contained in this section were contained in Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title IX, §901, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1853, which was set out as a note under section 155 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 112–239, §511(c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Retention of Grade of Incumbents in Positions on Effective Date

Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(tt), as added by Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title V, §506(a)(1), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1374, provided that: "The grade of service of an officer serving as of the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2016, see below] in a position whose statutory grade is affected by an amendment made by this section [see Tables for classification] may not be reduced after that date by reason of such amendment as long as the officer remains in continuous service in such position after that date."

[Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title V, §506(a)(2), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1374, provided that: "The amendment made by paragraph (1) [enacting section 502(tt) of Pub. L. 114–328, set out above] shall take effect as of December 23, 2016, and be treated as if included in the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328)."]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

317 

CA 11-01301 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

 

JASON BURLEW, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, 

AND RICHARD KATCHUK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

TALISMAN ENERGY USA INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC, ALBANY (JOHN T. MCMANUS OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAMSON, CLUNE & STEVENS, ITHACA (JOHN H. HANRAHAN, III, OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County

(Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered April 19, 2011 in a breach of

contract action. The order, among other things, granted the cross

motion of plaintiff Richard Katchuk for partial summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988;

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see

also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: March 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# C_2006281EN.01002701.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/27

---

Action brought on 3 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-407/06)

(2006/C 281/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Schima and J. Hottiaux, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003 amending Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (1), or in any event by having failed to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003 amending Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (1), or in any event by having failed to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of Directive 2003/105/EC expired on 30 June 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 97.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
    Date: March 24, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5 Research Court, 
Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call.)
    Contact Person: Andrew J. Griffith, PhD, MD, Director, Division 
of Intramural Research, National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders, 5 Research Court, Room 1A13, Rockville, MD 
20850. 301-496-1960. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6700150e01010e130627090e03040349090e0f49000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d0a1f040b0b04190c2d0304090e0943030405430a021b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 16, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4026 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §902. Art. 102. Forcing a safeguard

Any person subject to this chapter who forces a safeguard shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 70.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 902 | 50:696. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 102), 64 Stat. 137. |
§ 63.16 Who conducts the background investigation and prepares the determination of suitability for employment? ( a ) The *Bureau of Indian Affairs* must use the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to conduct background investigations for Federal employees. The BIA must designate qualified security personnel to adjudicate the results of background investigations.
( b ) *Indian tribes and tribal organizations* may conduct their own background investigations, contract with private firms, or request the OPM to conduct an investigation. The investigation should cover the past five years of the individual's employment, education, etc.
# C_2006221EN.01000101.xml

| 14.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 September 2006

(2006/C 221/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2677 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4597 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67655 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2478 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5892 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,71 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3825 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5766 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,541 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,76 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9637 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5024 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,368 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8630 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6885 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4228 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8636 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9653 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9989 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 215,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3236 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0764 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3820 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 551,92 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,656 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,816 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,389 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2677

JPY

Japanese yen

149,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4597

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67655

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2478

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5892

ISK

Iceland króna

89,71

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3825

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5766

CZK

Czech koruna

28,541

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,76

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9637

RON

Romanian leu

3,5024

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,368

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8630

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6885

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4228

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8636

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9653

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9989

KRW

South Korean won

1 215,85

ZAR

South African rand

9,3236

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0764

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3820

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 551,92

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,656

PHP

Philippine peso

63,816

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9850

THB

Thai baht

47,389

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 522.8 Disapproval of a class III ordinance. ( a ) Notwithstanding compliance with the requirements of § 522.7 and no later than 90 days after a submission under § 522.2, the Chair shall disapprove an ordinance or resolution if the Chair determines that: ( 1 ) A tribal governing body did not adopt the ordinance or resolution in compliance with the governing documents of the tribe; or
( 2 ) A tribal governing body was significantly and unduly influenced in the adoption of the ordinance or resolution by a person having a direct or indirect financial interest in a management contract, a person having management responsibility for a management contract, or their agents.
( b ) The Chair shall notify a tribe of its right of appeal a disapproval under part 582 of this chapter. A disapproval shall be effective immediately unless appealed under part 582 of this chapter.
§ 309.15 What are examples of apparel that are Indian products? ( a ) Apparel made or substantially decorated by an Indian, including, but not limited to, parkas, jackets, coats, moccasins, boots, slippers, mukluks, mittens, gloves, gauntlets, dresses, and shirts, are Indian products.
( b ) Specific examples include, but are not limited to: seal skin parkas, ribbon appliqué dance shawls, smoked moose hide slippers, deer skin boots, patchwork jackets, calico ribbon shirts, wing dresses, and buckskin shirts.
[68 FR 35170, June 12, 2003]
#### MILLS v. CHARLOTTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

No. 129P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 507

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
----

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-191/05) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 79/409/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Special protection area - Alteration without scientific basis)

(2006/C 224/22)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beek and A. Caeiros, Agents)

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Fernandes, Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1) — Special protection area — Alteration without scientific basis

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

----

(1)OJ C 155, 25.6.2005.

----
§ 1000.427 What happens after the informal conference? ( a ) Within 10 business days of the informal conference, the person who conducted the informal conference shall mail to the Tribe/Consortium a brief summary of the informal conference. The summary must include any agreements reached or changes from the initial position of the bureau or the Tribe/Consortium.
( b ) If in its judgment no agreement was reached, the Tribe/Consortium may choose to appeal the initial decision, as modified by any changes made as a result of the informal conference, under § 1000.421 of this subpart to the IBIA, bureau head/Assistant Secretary, or IBCA.