alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 515.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the regulations the National Indian Gaming Commission (Commission) follows in implementing the Privacy Act of 1974. These regulations should be read together with the Privacy Act, which provides additional information about records maintained on individuals. The regulations in this part apply to all records contained within systems of records maintained by the Commission that are retrieved by an individual's name or personal identifier. They describe the procedures by which individuals may request access to records about themselves, request amendment or correction of those records, and request an accounting of disclosures of those records by the Commission. The Commission shall also process all Privacy Act requests for access to records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, and the Commission's FOIA regulations contained in 25 CFR part 517, which gives requesters maximum disclosure.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-63 

May 6, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(a) Plans Covered. Requirements of Coverage

4021(b)(6) Plans Covered. Unfunded Plans for Highly Compensated Employees

4021(b)(8) Plans Covered. Excess Benefit Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request for reconsideration of our determination that the * * * (the "Plan") is not covered

by Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). After reviewing the plan document

and your letter of February 21, 1975, it is our conclusion that this Corporation's initial determination of non-coverage

is correct. 

Section 4021 of the Act sets forth the requirements for coverage by Title IV of the Act. Section 4021(a)(1) provides

that plans which have in practice met the requirements for tax qualification, as in effect for the preceding 5 years of the

plan, are covered by Title IV. Section 4021(a)(2) provides that a plan which is, or has been determined by the Secretary

of the Treasury to be, a plan which meets the requirements of § 401(a) or § 404(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of

1954 (the "Code") is covered by Title IV. 

The Plan is an unfunded "pay as you go" plan. It has not been determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to meet

§ 401(a) or § 404(a)(2) [*2] of the Code, nor does it in fact meet the requirements of those sections. In addition, it

has not been tax qualified in practice for the five preceding plan years. Accordingly, the Plan does not meet the

requirements of § 4021(a)(1) or § 4021(a)(2) of the Act, and is therefore not subject to Title IV. 

 In your letter you indicate that an unfunded plan such as yours should be covered under § 4021(a)(1), otherwise

§ § 4021(b)(6) and 4021(b)(8), which exclude from coverage certain types of unfunded plans, would be superfluous.

Those sections exclude unfunded plans which could not be covered by Title IV since they could not be tax qualified.

In our view those sections are superfluous. 

If I can answer any further questions, please feel free to contact me. 

Jeffrey S. Gershman 

Attorney 

Office of the General Counsel
§ 175.125 How do I request and receive service? ( a ) If you need electrical service in an area where we provide service, you must contact our utility in that service area.
( b ) To receive service, you must enter into an Agreement with that utility after it has determined that you have met its requirements.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

s0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137641 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137641 

 COA: 278279 

Oakland CC: 2006-208894-FC 

TIMOTHY PAUL BUSS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### SMITH v. SELCO PRODUCTS, INC.

No. 570P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 151

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
#### § 217.5 Management decisions.

In arriving at management decisions concerning the assets, the business committee shall be entitled to cast 72.83814 votes and the board of directors shall be entitled to cast 27.16186 votes. Any total number of votes cast exceeding 50 shall be sufficient to determine an issue submitted to the joint managers for resolution. A majority of votes cast will decide an issue.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 69

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Government Reform

in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1999

Mr. BURTON of Indiana submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Government Reform in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Government

4 Reform (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries,

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $21,028,913 for the One Hundred

9 Sixth Congress.
2

•HRES 69 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $10,301,933 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 1999, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2000; and

7 (2) not more than $10,726,980 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2000, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2001.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Normas y Regulaciones 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Normas y Regulaciones

                          - Información sobre los Beneficios Garantizados por PBGC
                          - Planes  de  Beneficios Definidos Congelados (Publicación en PDF)
                          - Información sobre Cómo la Fecha de Bancarrota Puede Afectar sus Beneficios
                          - Tabla de Garantías Mensuales Máximas
                          - Garantías de Beneficios en Planes de Empleadores Múltiples 
                          - Información sobre Planes de Empleador Único
                          - Garantías para Participantes con Discapacidad en Planes de Empleador Único

September 11, 2020
§ 166.309 Who determines livestock class and livestock ownership requirements on permitted Indian land? ( a ) Tribes determine the class of livestock and livestock ownership requirements for livestock that may be grazed on range units composed entirely of tribal land or which include government land, subject to the grazing capacity prescribed by us under § 166.305 of this part.
( b ) For permits on range units containing, in whole or part, individually-owned Indian land, we will adopt the tribal determination in paragraph (a) of this section.
Order entered May 2 4 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00567

- CV

DARLENE C. AMRHEIN, Appellant

V. ATTORNEY LENNIE F. B OLLINGER AND WORMINTON & BOLLINGE R LAW FIRM, Appellee s
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 02654

- 2017



### O RDER

Befor e the Court are (1) appellant’s April 4, 2019 motion “ for stay and abatement;” (2)
appellant’s April 5, 2019 “motion to sta y this appeal;” (3) appellees’ April 11, 2019 response in
opposition to appellant’s motion s for stay; and (4) appellant’s April 23, 2019 “objections to
appellees objections

. ” In her April 4 th motion , appellant appears to complain of our April 1,

2019 orde r directing her to file written verification she has made arrangements to pay the
reporter’s fee

. 1 In her April 5 th motion, appellant appears to request a stay of this appeal until the
Court receives “supplements” of record s from “outside cases

. ” We DE NY the motions.
As briefing appears complete, this appeal will be submitted in due course.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE

1 She also appears to complain of certain matters concerning a separate appeal she has filed. Those complaints are not properly before us in this appeal

.
# Low
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-9 

March 26, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4203(b) Complete Withdrawal. Building & Construction Industry Exemption

4203(f) Complete Withdrawal. Special Withdrawal Liability Rules

4208(d) Reduction of Partial Withdrawal Liability. Building & Construction Industry Exemption 

OPINION: 

 Your letter, on behalf of the plan sponsor, concerning the application of Section 4203(b), 4208(d) and 4203(f) of

the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments

Act of 1980 (the "Multiemployer Act"), 29 U.S.C. § § 1383(b), 1388(d), 1383(f), to the * * * Pension Plan ("Plan") has

been referred to us by the Department of Labor. You request a determination that the plan is a plan for the building and

construction industry within the meaning of § § 4203(b) and 4208(d) for purposes of determining the occurrence of a

"withdrawal" from the Plan. In the alternative, you request that the Plan be permitted to adopt withdrawal liability rules

similar to the rules for building and construction industry plans pursuant to § 4203(f). 

Under the Multiemployer Act, the plan sponsor has the initial responsibility to decide such questions consistent with

his fiduciary responsibilities. Any disputes between the [*2] plan sponsor and a withdrawing employer are to be

resolved through statutory review, arbitration and, if necessary, court proceedings. PBGC will ordinarily avoid

interjecting itself in such proceedings by issuing an opinion on the application of the law to a particular set of facts.

PBGC will, however, continue to provide guidance on general interpretative questions regarding the Act. 

In this regard, with respect to your question regarding the meaning of "building and instruction industry" ERISA

does not specifically define those activities that are included within the term "building and construction industry". The

House report on the Multiemployer Act does indicate that, in applying this special rule, the term should be "given the

same meaning as has developed in administration of the Taft-Hartley Act," H.R. Rept 96-869 (Part I) (House Educ. &

Labor Comm.), p. 76 (April 2, 1980). See also, Summary & Analysis of S. 1076 (Senate Labor Comm.), p. 14 (April,

1980). Accordingly, if the activities of the contributing employers in the * * * Plan are encompassed by the term

"building and construction industry" under the Taft-Hartley Act, then they would be similarly treated [*3] under ERISA.

With respect to your second request, ERISA § 4203(f), 29 U.S.C. § 4203(f), authorizes PBGC to prescribe

regulations under which plans in industries other than construction or entertainment may adopt special withdrawal rules

similar to those in § § 4203(b) and 4208(d). PBGC will issue a regulation in this area in the future. 

I trust this will help you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Patrick White, Deceased. Anne Mary Cleary and Catherine Gorman, Appellants; William Watson and Others, Respondents.

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county.affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and .Rich, JJ., concurred.
## Harcros Chemicals Inc. 5200 Speaker Road Kansas City, KS 66106 Telephone: 913/621-7747 Fax: 913/621-7746 E-mail: OrganicsCS@Harcros.com Date 06/28/13

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) Office of Pollution Control andToxics (OPPT) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) EPA East Building, Room E6428 (202-564-8930) 1201 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20460 (202-564-8930) Attn: TSCA Section 4 40 CFR 

### § 799.5087 (Docket# EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531) Telephone number: 202-564-8091 

### CBIC Control Number 

# 354953

RE: Requestfor Extension ofTesting for D-Giuco-Heptonic acid, monosodiumsalt, (2 xi)- To Whom it May Concern: Harcros Chemicals Inc. submitted a letterofintentfor D-gluco-Heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi.)- [CAS# 31138-65-5] on April 5, 2011. Weare requesting an extension until July31, 2013 to complete the testing requirements in accordancewith EPA'sfinal rule, Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals; Second Group of Chemicals, published in the Federal Registeron January7, 2011 at 76 Fed. Reg. pages 1067through 1093 docketed under EPA docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007- 0531. This request for additional time is necessitated by the difficultiesthat Harcros Chemicals has encountered in receiving the test data infonnation and final reports from ourtesting facility, Harlan Laboratories. Harlan had indicated that we would receive the requested information by the end ofJune 2013. To date, we are missing the final report for the Physical Properties, Test SymbolsA1, A2 and A4, Melting Point, Boiling Point and Water Solubility. In addition we are also missing final results and the final report for the Combined Repeated DoseToxicity Studywith the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening, Test Symbol F1. This extension is requested forthese testing requirements. Please let us know ifthis extension request is acceptableto EPA. Ifanyfurther information is required, please do not hesitateto contact me at (913) 621-7802 orat asavini@harcros.com.



### Ann Marie Savini Harcros Chemicals Inc. Regulatory Specialist

cc: Peter Radford Howard Stevenson John Miles James Grantham Don Meuschke File 

# •
§ 20.331 What is Adult Care Assistance? Adult care assistance provides non-medical care for eligible adult Indians who: ( a ) Have needs that require personal care and supervision due to advanced age, infirmity, physical condition, or mental impairments; and
( b ) Cannot be cared for in their own home by family members.
# C_2006331EN.01002605.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-258/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 331/58)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 29.7.2006.

1

---
### [§8684a. Omitted]

#### Codification

Section, added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1876(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4291, related to rate for progress payments in the repair, maintenance, or overhaul of naval vessels, and was to become effective Jan. 1, 2022. Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(n)(3), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2146, repealed section 1876 of Pub. L. 116–283, effective as if included in title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283, thereby omitting this section before it took effect. Text of section 2307(g)(1) of this title, which had been transferred to this section, was transferred to section 3808(a) of this title.
#### § 30.115 May proposed alternative requirements use parts of the Secretary's requirements?

Yes, a tribal governing body or school board may use the Secretary's requirements in part or in whole. Alternative proposals must clearly identify any retained portions of the Secretary's requirements.
### §2350i. Foreign contributions for cooperative projects

(a) Crediting of Contributions.—Whenever the United States participates in a cooperative project with a friendly foreign country or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) on a cost-sharing basis, any contribution received by the United States from that foreign country or NATO to meet its share of the costs of the project may be credited to appropriations available to an appropriate military department or another appropriate organization within the Department of Defense, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.

(b) Use of Amounts Credited.—The amount of a contribution credited pursuant to subsection (a) to an appropriation account in connection with a cooperative project referred to in that subsection shall be available only for payment of the share of the project expenses allocated to the foreign country or NATO making the contribution. Payments for which such amount is available include the following:

(1) Payments to contractors and other suppliers (including the Department of Defense and other participants acting as suppliers) for necessary articles and services.

(2) Payments for any damages and costs resulting from the performance or cancellation of any contract or other obligation.

(3) Payments or reimbursements of other program expenses, including program office overhead and administrative costs.

(4) Refunds to other participants.

(c) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "cooperative project" means a jointly managed arrangement, described in a written cooperative agreement entered into by the participants, that—

(A) is undertaken by the participants in order to improve the conventional defense capabilities of the participants; and

(B) provides for—

(i) one or more participants (other than the United States) to share with the United States the cost of research and development, testing, evaluation, or joint production (including follow-on support) of defense articles;

(ii) the United States and another participant concurrently to produce in the United States and the country of such other participant a defense article jointly developed in a cooperative project described in clause (i); or

(iii) the United States to procure a defense article or a defense service from another participant in the cooperative project.

(2) The term "defense article" has the meaning given such term in section 47(3) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794(3)).

(3) The term "defense service" has the meaning given such term in section 47(4) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794(4)).

(Added Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title X, §1047(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1467.)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-55 

November 10, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(a) Plans Covered. Requirements of Coverage 

OPINION: 

 This is in reference to the notice of termination filed on September 22, 1975 for * * * as plan administrator of the

* * * (the "Plan"). 

In order to be eligible for insurance under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (the "Act"),

a plan must be covered by § 4021 of the Act at the time it terminates. You have indicated that the terms of the Plan were

never reduced to a written instrument. We have consulted with the Internal Revenue Service and are advised that where

all of the provisions essential to qualification have not been reduced to writing, a plan does not qualify under § 401(a)

of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan cannot, therefore, be a covered plan under § 4021. 

You have further indicated that premium payments have been made to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

("PBGC" ), to cover this plan. Because the Plan is not a covered plan under Act § 4021 no premium payments were

required. Accordingly, we have referred this matter to the premium refund division of the PBGC. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### §1327. Effect of confirmation

(a) The provisions of a confirmed plan bind the debtor and each creditor, whether or not the claim of such creditor is provided for by the plan, and whether or not such creditor has objected to, has accepted, or has rejected the plan.

(b) Except as otherwise provided in the plan or the order confirming the plan, the confirmation of a plan vests all of the property of the estate in the debtor.

(c) Except as otherwise provided in the plan or in the order confirming the plan, the property vesting in the debtor under subsection (b) of this section is free and clear of any claim or interest of any creditor provided for by the plan.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2650.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

Subsection (a) binds the debtor and each creditor to the provisions of a confirmed plan, whether or not the claim of the creditor is provided for by the plan and whether or not the creditor has accepted, rejected, or objected to the plan. Unless the plan itself or the order confirming the plan otherwise provides, confirmation is deemed to vest all property of the estate in the debtor, free and clear of any claim or interest of any creditor provided for by the plan.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****College preparation checklist.**
 
2004 | 2009| 2011 | 2013: MobiPDFepub| 2016: JanuaryJuly
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.2:C 68/10/
Item Number:0455-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000936024
 
March 8, 2018
§ 700.473 Administrative expenditures of the Commission. The Commission may use funds in an amount not to exceed 5 percent of the funds authorized under this subpart for expenses relating to the administration of the discretionary fund including— ( a ) Personnel, whose time is expended directly in support of such administration;
( b ) Supplies which are expended directly in support of such administration;
( c ) Contracts, where the work performed is directly related to such administration;
( d ) Printing, directly in support of such administration; and
( e ) Travel, directly related to such administration.