alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 214.10 Royalty rates.

Royalties will be required as follows, subject to the approval of the President, in accordance with the act of June 28, 1906 (34 Stat. 543):

(a) For gold, silver, or copper lessee shall pay quarterly a royalty of 10 percent to be computed on the gross value of the ores as shown by reduction returns after deducting freight and treatment charges. Duplicate reduction returns shall be filed by the lessee with the officer in charge within 20 days after the reduction of the ores.

(b) For coal the lessee shall pay a royalty of 10 cents per ton of 2,000 pounds on mine run or coal as taken from the mines, including what is commonly called “slack.”

(c) For asphaltum and allied substances, the lessee shall pay quarterly a royalty of 10 cents per ton of 2,000 pounds on crude material, and 60 cents per ton on refined substances.

(d) For substances other than gold, silver, copper, lead, zinc, coal, and asphaltum the lessee shall pay quarterly a royalty of 10 percent of the value at the nearest shipping point of all ores, metals, or minerals marketed.

(e) The royalties to be paid for lead and zinc shall be computed for each mineral at the same rate that the amount of the concentrates of such mineral bears to the total amount of dirt or rock actually mined, except as stipulated in this section. The royalty so determined shall be increased by adding 1 percent for each increase of $10 in the selling price per ton thereof over and above the following, which shall be the agreed base or standard:

For zinc—$50

For lead—$65

but in no case shall the rate of royalty be less than 5 percent or more than 20 percent. The percentage of recovery shall be computed as nearly as practicable upon the ore included in each sale, but where it is impracticable so to do the officer in charge and the lessee shall agree upon some other method of computation which will produce substantially the same result: *Provided,* That in case of their disagreement the Commissioner of Indian Affairs shall prescribe a rule of computation to be followed in such cases.

Note:

The royalty would always be determined under this rule by ascertaining the percentage of recovery were it not for two things: (1) the flat rates which are fixed as the minimum and the maximum rates of royalty and (2) variations in the selling price of the ores. Concrete examples coming under the rule are set forth in the following table:

Zinc

[Where the base or standard is $50 per ton]

| Percentage of recovery | Selling price | Royalty (percent) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7 | $48 | 7 |
| 14 | 49 | 14 |
| 12 | 50 | 12 |
| 15 | 60 | 16 |
| 30 | 60 | 20 |
| 9 | 70 | 11 |

A similar table might be constructed for royalties on lead, but in so doing it would be necessary to bear in mind that the base or standard selling price for the lead is to be $65 instead of $50.
#### § 48.119 May a lease be assigned, subleased, or mortgaged?

A lessee may assign, sublease, or mortgage a lease only with the approval of the Director.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 610 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 5, 2000.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2941) to establish the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area in the 
State of Arizona. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on 
Resources now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record and 
numbered 1 pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII. That amendment in the nature of a 
substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order against that 
amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. During consideration of the 
bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 
minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any 
amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment 
in the nature of a substitute made in order as original text. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### [§9772. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 588, authorized unappropriated public land or other property of United States to be reserved or used for air bases or testing fields.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that this section is repealed effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see note under section 1701 of Title 43, Public Lands.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services [Document Identifier OS-0990-032; 60-Day Notice]
 AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS. In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Secretary (OS), Department of Health and Human Services, is publishing the following summary of a proposed information collection request for public comment. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology to minimize the information collection burden. To obtain copies of the supporting statement and any related forms for the proposed paperwork collections referenced above, e-mail your request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, and OS document identifier, to 
                        *Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov,*
                         or call the Reports Clearance Office on (202) 690-6162. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collections must be directed to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer at the above email address within 60-days. *Title:*
                         HHS Web Site Customer Satisfaction Survey—0990-0321—Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs. *Abstract:*
                         The results of the HHS Web Site Customer Satisfaction Survey will be used to ensure that the content on the HHS Web sites meets visitor needs and expectations. The results will also determine if the site is easy to use and the content easy to understand. Estimated Annualized Burden Table
Form
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses per respondent
Average 
                             burden hours per response 
                             (in hrs.)
Total burden hoursSurvey
48,000
1
12/60
9,600
 Seleda Perryman, Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction Act Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 2011-428 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4150-25-P
H. Res. 306

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 28, 1999.

Whereas, earlier this year, the House of Representatives

passed a Social Security lockbox designed to protect the

Social Security surplus by an overwhelming vote of 416

to 12;

Whereas bipartisan efforts over the past few years have eliminated the budget deficit and created a projected combined Social Security and non-Social Security surplus of

$2,896,000,000,000 over the next 10 years;

Whereas this surplus is largely due to the collection of the

Social Security taxes and interest on already collected receipts in the trust fund;

Whereas the President and the Congress have not reached an

agreement to use any of the non-Social Security surplus

on providing tax relief; and

Whereas any unspent portion of the projected surplus will

have the effect of reducing the debt held by the public:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the the House of Representatives that the House—

(1) should not consider legislation that would spend

any of the Social Security surplus; and
2

•HRES 306 EH

(2) should continue to pursue efforts to continue to

reduce the $3,618,000,000,000 in debt held by the public.

Attest:

Clerk.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SELVYN MANUEL JUAREZ

- DOMINGO,

Petitioner,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 70887 Agency No. A202

- 029

- 899

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 12, 2019 **
Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Sel vyn Manuel Juarez

- Domingo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding o f removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 19 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 70887

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings

. Garcia

- Milian v. Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014)

. We dism iss in part and deny in part the petition
for review. We lack jurisdiction to consider Juarez

- Domingo ’s challenges to th e IJ’s
time bar determination because he did not raise them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the agency).
Juarez

- Domingo fears harm in Guatemala based on his family membership

. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Juarez

- Domingo failed to establish that any harm he experienced or fear s in Guatemala was or would be on account of a protected ground. See Ayala v. Holder , 640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is established, an applicant must still show that “perse cution was or will be on account of his membership in such group” (emphasis in original)); see also Barajas

- Romero v. Lynch , 846 F .3d 351, 356

- 60 (9th Cir. 2017) (discussing the respective nexus requirements for asylum and withholding of removal claims);
Z etino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An [applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, Juarez

- Domingo ’ s asylum and withhold ing of removal claim s fail.3 18

- 70887

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because
Juarez

- Domingo failed to show that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Gua temala

. See Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). Finally, Juarez

- Domingo’s request to remand is denied. See Karingithi v.
Whitaker , 913 F.3d 1158, 1160

- 62 (9th Cir. 2019) ( initial notice to appear need not
include time and date information to vest jurisdiction in the immigration court )

. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part
.
10.6 

 11/08/04 

Page 1 

Quitting Tobacco: Facing the Morning ... Without Smoking 

What To Expect 

• Expect that your morning coffee will not taste the same without a cigarette. 

Did You Know? 

• For many smokers, lighting up is the first event of the day. Part of many people’s 

dependence on cigarettes evolves from a routine built mostly on making opportunities to 

smoke. The morning can set the tone for the rest of the day. 

What To Do 

• Plan a different wake-up routine. 

• Take your attention off smoking right away. 

• Be sure no cigarettes are available. 

• Begin each day with deep breathing and one or more glasses of water. 

• Make a list of early morning triggers, and avoid them. 

• Begin each day with a preplanned activity that will keep you busy for an hour or more. It 

will keep your mind and body busy so that you don’t think about smoking. 

Nicotine and Your Body and Mind 

• After 6 to 8 hours of sleep, your nicotine level drops and your body develops a need for a 

quick boost of nicotine when you wake up. 

• Your body has become dependent on nicotine. Your mind must be ready to overcome 

this physical need. Before you go to sleep, make a list of things you need to avoid in the 

morning that will make you want to smoke. Place this list where you used to place your 

cigarettes. 

Related Notes 

• Once you pinpoint high-risk situations that trigger the urge to smoke, you can start to 

handle such situations rationally. Waking up in the morning and starting your normal 

routine provides plenty of triggers to tempt you to smoke. Nicotine cravings may be 

reduced by using nicotine replacement products, which deliver small, steady doses of 

nicotine into the body. Nicotine replacement patches, gum, lozenges, nasal spray, and 

inhaler appear to be equally effective. Buproprion pills (which don’t contain nicotine) 

also help relieve withdrawal symptoms.
10.6 

 11/08/04 

Page 2 

How To Get Help 

• If you or someone you know wants help with giving up tobacco, please call the National 

Cancer Institute’s Smoking Quitline toll-free at 1–877–44U–QUIT (1–877–448–7848). 

The information specialists on the Quitline can provide suggestions and support to help 

smokers break the habit. 

• The Federal Government’s Smokefree.gov Web site (http://www.smokefree.gov) allows 

you to choose the help that best fits your needs. You can get immediate assistance: 

o View an online step-by-step cessation guide. 

o Find state quitline telephone numbers. 

o Instant message an expert through NCI’s LiveHelp service. 

o Download, print, or order publications about quitting smoking.

# # # 

This fact sheet was reviewed on 11/08/04

This fact sheet was adapted from material developed by the Tobacco Education and Prevention Program of 

the Arizona Department of Health Services and the Arizona Smokers’ Helpline of the University of Arizona.
Order entered January 17, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00863-CV

LESKEL NICHOLS, Appellant

V.

DOWNTOWN KWIK LUBE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-00165-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 15, 2020 motion for extension of time to file his 

corrected brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the corrected brief be filed no later than 

February 18, 2020. We caution appellant that failure to file the brief may result in dismissal of 

this appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4307]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement 
Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice 
Improvement Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, April 7, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement 
Project Committee will be held Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 2 p.m., 
Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information, please contact Ms. 
Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 
MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-4307 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### [§9541. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §822(d)(2), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1707]

Section, added Pub. L. 97–258, §2(b)(13)(B), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1058, related to gratuitous services of officers of Air Force Reserve. See section 10212 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 471 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 203
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 471

                          [Report No. 106-574]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 94) 
 proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
                      respect to tax limitations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2000

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 94) 
 proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
                      respect to tax limitations.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 94) 
proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
respect to tax limitations. The joint resolution shall be considered as 
read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the joint resolution and any amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment printed in 
the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII, if offered 
by the Minority Leader or his designee, which shall be considered as 
read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided 
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 203

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 471

                          [Report No. 106-574]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 94) 
 proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
                      respect to tax limitations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 11, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

83-6 

February 10, 1983 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022 Benefits Guaranteed 

OPINION: 

 Thank you for your recent telephone call regarding the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's (the "PBGC")

treatment of certain provisions of the * * * Pension Plan under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security

Act of 1974 (as amended 1980). 

You expressed concern about the PBGC's application of the provisions of the * * * Plan that provide for credited

service for a period after an active employee is laid off. The PBGC guarantees all benefits that are nonforfeitable on the

date of termination. Section 4022 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1322; 29 C.F.R. § § 2613.3(a) and 2613.6. Accordingly, the

PBGC insures, subject to other generally applicable limitations and phaseins, benefits that accrue after layoff up to the

date of termination. Benefits that would have accrued after termination are not insured. 

In our conversation, you vividly set out the hardship and suffering that the * * * bankrupcty will have on many of

the * * * employees. We share your concerns and we will do everything possible within the rules, regulations, and law

to help diminish the impact of these unfortunate circumstances. 

We trust this response will assist you in responding [*2] to your constituents. Should you or your staff have any

questions regarding this matter, please contact me (254-4864) or * * *, the attorney handling this case (254-7224). 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel