alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 62.4 Who may appeal. ( a ) A person who is the subject of an adverse enrollment action may file or have filed on his/her behalf an appeal. An adverse enrollment action is: ( 1 ) The rejection of an application for enrollment by a Bureau official incident to the preparation of a roll for Secretarial approval;
( 2 ) The removal of a name from a tribal roll by a Bureau official incident to review of the roll for Secretarial approval;
( 3 ) The rejection of an application for enrollment or the disenrollment of a tribal member by a tribal committee when the tribal governing document provides for an appeal of the action to the Secretary;
( 4 ) The change in degree of Indian blood by a tribal committee which affects a tribal member when the tribal governing document provides for an appeal of the action to the Secretary;
( 5 ) The change in degree of Indian blood by a Bureau official which affects an individual; and
( 6 ) The certification of degree of Indian blood by a Bureau official which affects an individual.
( b ) A tribal committee may file an appeal as provided for in § 61.11 of this chapter.
( c ) A sponsor may file an appeal on behalf of another person who is subject to an adverse enrollment action.
# C_2006326EN.01004701.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/47

---

Action brought on 20 November 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-465/06)

(2006/C 326/95)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Montaguti and R. Vidal Puig, Agents, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2003/98/EC expired on 1 July 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 345 of 31.12.2003, p. 90.

1

---
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1183

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Guadalupe Mendoza-Nava, also known * as Guadalupe Mendoza Martinez, also * [UNPUBLISHED] known as Guadalupe Ascencio, also * known as Noel Curz-Martine, also * known as Guadalupe Mendoza- * Martinez, also known as Noe Cruz, * also known as Guadalupe Guadalupe- * Ascencio, also known as Noel * Curzmartine, also known as Guadalupe * Mendoza, also known as Vicente * Franco, also known as Natividad * Canton-Gaspar, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 5, 2007 Filed: October 10, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
-2- Guadalupe Mendoza-Nava pleaded guilty to unlawfully re-entering the United States after having been previously removed following his conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). On appeal, he challenges for the first time the district court’s 1 calculation of his criminal history points under the advisory Guidelines.

We review the court’s criminal hist ory calculations for plain error. See United States v. Plancarte-Vazquez , 450 F.3d 848, 854 (8th Cir. 2006) . Under this standard, we will reverse only judgments which affect substantial rights and seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings. See United States v. Kamerud , 326 F.3d 1008, 1013 (8th Cir. 2003).
The record clearly establishes that, even if Mendoza-Nava was incorrectly assessed 2 criminal history points for committing the instant offense while on probation for a gross misdemeanor offense, the error was harmless because MendozaNava was undisputedly on parole for a domes tic assault conviction at the time of the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(d) (“[a]dd 2 point s if the defendant committed the instant offense while under any criminal ju stice sentence, including . . . parole”); United States v. Gutierrez , 437 F.3d 733, 737 (8th Cir. 2006) (even if it was error to include two additional crimin al history points, error wa s harmless because it did not alter Guidelines range); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(3 )(A) (at sentencing court may accept any undisputed portion of presentence report as finding of fact); United States v. English , 329 F.3d 615, 617 (8th Cir. 2003) (court of appeals can affirm district court’s judgment on grounds supported by record, even if grounds were rejected by trial court). Consequently, ev en if it was also error to a ssess the other criminal history point he disputes on appeal, any error was also harmless--because a reduction from 14 to 13 criminal history points could not affect his criminal history category. See-3- U.S.S.G. § 5 Sentencing Table (13 or more criminal history points results in Category VI criminal history).
Accordingly, we conclude that Mendoza- Nava has not established plain error, and the judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
THE NEW GREAT GAME
IN MUSLIM CENTRAL ASIA

M. E. AHRARI
*with
**JAMES BEAL

McNair Paper 47
January 1996
***A popular Government, without popular information or the means ofacquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.

JAMES MADISON to W. T. BARRY
August 4, 1822

INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL STRATEGIC STUDIES

NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY
Washington, DC **NATIONAL DEFENSE  UNIVERSITY  
*President:* Lieutenant General Ervin J. Rokke, USAF 
*Vice President:* Ambassador William G. Walker  

**INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL STRATEGIC STUDIES**
*Director & Publisher:* Dr. Hans A. Binnendijk

**NDU Press**
Fort Lesley J. McNair , Washington, DC 20319-6000 
	Phone: (202) 475-1913     Facsimile: (202) 475-1012 
*Director & Managing Editor:*Dr. Frederick T. Kiley
*Vice Director & General Editor:* Major Thomas W. Krise, USAF
*Chief, Editorial & Publications Branch:*  Mr. George C. Maerz
*Senior**Editor:*Ms. Mary A. Sommerville
*Editor:*Mr. Jonathan W. Pierce
*Editor for this issue:* Ms. Mary A.  Sommerville
*Editorial Assistant*:  Ms. Cherie R. Preville
*Distribution Manager:*Mrs. Myrna Myers 
*Secretary:*  Mrs. Laura Hall**

From time to time, INSS publishes McNair Papers to provoke thought and inform discussion on issues of U.S. nationalsecurity in the post-Cold War era.  These monographs present current topics related to national security strategy andpolicy, defense resource management, international affairs, civil-military relations, military technology, and joint, combined, and coalition operations.
***Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations, expressed or implied, are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect theviews of the National Defense University, the Department of Defense, or any other U.S. Government agency.  Cleared for publicrelease; distribution unlimited. 

Portions of this publication may be quoted or reprinted without further permission, with credit to the Institute for NationalStrategic Studies, Washington, DC. A courtesy copy of reviews and tearsheets would be appreciated.
**For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office
Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328**ISSN 1071-7552

Table of Contents
Return to NDU Press Index
Return to INSS Home Page***************
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About PBGC 
-  Experiencing An Unresolved Service Issue With PBGC? 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Experiencing an Unresolved Service Issue with PBGC?

If you have repeatedly called or written to PBGC and have not received a response, please contact the PBGC Problem Resolution Officer for Participants.

 

**Call**: 1-800-400-7242 ext. 4014

 

participant.pro@pbgc.gov

 

**Mailing Address**

PBGC Problem Resolution Officer (Participants)445 12th Street SWWashington, DC 20024-2101

 

----

**Privacy Act Statement:**The Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 5 U.S.C. § 552a requires PBGC to give you this notice when collecting information from you. PBGC uses the information we collect here, which includes your name, contact information, and reason for contacting PBGC, to identify you in PBGC systems and contact you in response to your inquiry. Your response is voluntary. However, failure to provide information to PBGC, including your name, contact information, and reason for contacting PBGC, may delay or prevent PBGC from contacting you.

PBGC may release information about you to other individuals and entities when necessary and appropriate under 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) of the Privacy Act, including to PBGC contractors addressing customer inquiries; to comply with Federal laws requiring disclosure of the information contained in our records; to facilitate statistical research, and audit or investigative matters. 

PBGC may also release information about you to appropriate federal, state, local or tribal law enforcement agencies when PBGC becomes aware of a possible violation of civil or criminal law. If PBGC, an employee of PBGC, the United States, or another agency of the United States, is involved in litigation, PBGC may provide relevant information about you to a court or other adjudicative body or to the Department of Justice when it represents PBGC. PBGC may also provide information about you to the Office of Management and Budget in connection with review of private relief legislation or to a Congressional office in response to an inquiry that office makes about you at your request. This information may also be disclosed for any of the PBGC general routine uses as published in the Federal Register.

PBGC publishes notices in the Federal Register that describe in more detail when information about you may be made available to others. A copy of the most recent Federal Register notice may be obtained online at PBGC.gov/privacy. 

July 27, 2022
§ 39.204 How does OIEP calculate ADM? OIEP calculates ADM by: ( a ) Adding the total enrollment figures from periodic reports received from each Bureau-funded school; and
( b ) Dividing the total enrollment for each school by the number of days in the school's reporting period.
EX-34.1

(logo)pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors of CoreLogic, Inc.:


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.
(the "Company"), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax
service provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2012 and for the year
then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi),
1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which
the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed
by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing
customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider
is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


February 6, 2013


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201
T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 72

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in

the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1999

Mr. KASICH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

the Budget in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on the Budget

4 (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Commit5 tee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses,

8 not more than $9,940,000 for the One Hundred Sixth

9 Congress.
2

•HRES 72 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $4,970,000 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1999, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 2000; and

7 (2) not more than $4,970,000 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 2000, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 2001.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
### Taxation
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Boxer Makes First Stop in U.S. During 2016 Deployment

By Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Matthew N. JacksonUSS Boxer (LHD4) Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


     I, Yaron Meerfeld, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of InkSure Technologies Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 10, 2004


/S/ Yaron Meerfeld
------------------
Yaron Meerfeld
Chief Executive Officer
### §1531. Presumption of insolvency based on recognition of a foreign main proceeding

In the absence of evidence to the contrary, recognition of a foreign main proceeding is, for the purpose of commencing a proceeding under section 303, proof that the debtor is generally not paying its debts as such debts become due.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 144.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
### §9024. Director of Small Business Programs

(a) Director.—There is a Director of Small Business Programs in the Department of the Air Force. The Director is appointed by the Secretary of the Air Force.

(b) Office of Small Business Programs.—The Office of Small Business Programs of the Department of the Air Force is the office that is established within the Department of the Air Force under section 15(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(k)). The Director of Small Business Programs is the head of such office.

(c) Duties and Powers.—(1) The Director of Small Business Programs shall, subject to paragraph (2), perform such duties regarding small business programs of the Department of the Air Force, and shall exercise such powers regarding those programs, as the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe.

(2) Section 15(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(k)), except for the designations of the Director and the Office, applies to the Director of Small Business Programs.

(Added Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title IX, §904(e)(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3401, §8024; renumbered §9024, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(c), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 9025 and 9027 were renumbered sections 9375 and 9377 of this title, respectively.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8024 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

The Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization of the Department of the Air Force and the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization of the Department of the Air Force were redesignated the Director of Small Business Programs of the Department of the Air Force and the Office of Small Business Programs of the Department of the Air Force, respectively, by Pub. L. 109–163 which also provided that references to the former were deemed to refer to the latter. See section 904(a) of Pub. L. 109–163, set out as a note under section 144 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.