alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBattery Data MI Importer Template Quick Start GuideIn order to ensure the persistent availability and reliability of test data generated over the course of the project, the M-SHELLS Project has decided to store acquired test data, as well as associated pedigree information, in the Granta Materials Intelligence (MI) database. To facilitate that effort, an importer template and associated graphical user interface (GUI) software have been developed, with this guide providing the operating instructions for their use. The template and automation software GUI are contained in the BatteryDataImporter.xlsm Excel workbook, and are to be used to import M-SHELLS summary, or pedigree, data and the associated raw test data results into an importer template-based file, formatted in such a way as to be ready for immediate upload to the Test Data: Battery Performance table of the Granta MI database. The provided GUI enables the user to select the appropriate summary data file(s), with each file containing the required information to identify any associated raw test data file(s) to be processed. In addition to describing the setup and operation of the importer template and GUI software, this guide also provides instructions for uploading processed data to the database and for viewing the data following upload.Document ID20170010280Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLevinson, Laurie H.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 23, 2017Publication DateOctober 1, 2017Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219568E-19414GRC-E-DAA-TN46154Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 533127.02.16.03.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170010280.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Guidance Document Database 
-  Tax Qualification 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# tax qualification

                  -  Opinion Letter 76-118
Once a plan is determined to be qualified by IRS, it is qualified for purposes of Title IV until qualification is revoked.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 81-10
A plan that in practice met the criteria for tax qualification for five years prior to its termination date was covered under Title IV at plan termination.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 74-14
Plans that are tax-qualified under IRC 401(a) are covered by Title IV.  Plans funded by flexible annuity policies may or may not be designed to achieve a defined benefit objective.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 74-08
A plan is covered for purposes of premium payments on the later of the date of establishment or the effective date.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 76-63
Plan is a pay as you go plan.  Plan is not tax qualified and thus is not covered under Title IV.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 74-15
Tax qualified defined benefit plans are generally covered under Title IV.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 77-155
A plan operating under a favorable IRS determination letter is covered under Title IV.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 74-18
Plan that is tax-qualified under IRC 401(a) is covered by Title IV.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 81-07
Following a restructuring of three pension plans maintained by one company, each restructured plan remains a Title IV covered plan, each plan qualifies as a successor plan, and the plan sponsor would be liable to PBGC for any funding deficiency at termination.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 81-16
A retirement arrangement is not covered plan under Title IV because it is not tax qualified.
-               document
# C_2006294EN.01003001.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/30

---

Action brought on 25 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-398/06)

(2006/C 294/53)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and R. Troosters, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by maintaining in force national provisions under which economically non-active and pensioned EU/EEA nationals must prove that they have lasting means of support in order to obtain a residence permit, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 90/364/EEC (1) of 28 June 1990 on the right of residence, Council Directive 90/365/EEC (2) of 28 June 1990 on the right of residence for employees and self-employed persons who have ceased their occupational activity and Council Directive 68/360/EEC (3) of 15 October 1968 on the abolition of restrictions on movement and residence within the Community for workers of Member States and their families; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by maintaining in force national provisions under which economically non-active and pensioned EU/EEA nationals must prove that they have lasting means of support in order to obtain a residence permit, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 90/364/EEC (1) of 28 June 1990 on the right of residence, Council Directive 90/365/EEC (2) of 28 June 1990 on the right of residence for employees and self-employed persons who have ceased their occupational activity and Council Directive 68/360/EEC (3) of 15 October 1968 on the abolition of restrictions on movement and residence within the Community for workers of Member States and their families;

1

2

3

| — | order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The requirement in the Netherlands rules that in order to obtain a residence permit a person must have sufficient means for a minimum period of one year is not in conformity with Community law.

---

(1)  OJ 1990 L 180, p. 26.

1

(2)  OJ 1990 L 180, p. 28.

2

(3)  OJ, English Special Edition 1968(II), p. 485.

3

---
### [§2533c. Renumbered §4872]
EX-34.5
McGladrey LLP


(logo) McGladrey


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors
Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of 2012 Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria (Management's Assertion), that Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC (the
Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) Regulation AB for services by the
Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation
AB reporting (the Platform), including only those asset-backed securities
transactions defined below, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012,
excluding the following criteria set forth in items 1122(d)(1)(i-iv),
1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), 1122(d)(4)(i-vi) and
1122(d)(4)(viii-xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Appendix A to
Management's Assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions
identified by management as constituting the Platform. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with its contractual obligations and
its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management's
Assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
activities related to the Platform and other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising
from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report.

We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria or its contractual obligations.

In our opinion, Management's Assertion as of and for the year ended December
31, 2012 for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ McGladrey LLP


Irvine, CA
February 25, 2013


Member of the RSM International network of Independent accounting, tax and
consulting firms.
#### § 584.7 When will I receive a copy of the record on which the Chair relied?

Within 10 days of the timely filing of a notice of appeal, or as soon thereafter as practicable, the record on which the Chair relied will be transmitted to the parties. In appeals dealing with temporary closure orders, the record will be transmitted within 5 days of the timely filing of a notice of appeal. Upon designation of the presiding official, the Commission shall transmit the agency record to the presiding official.
# C_2006190EN.01002402.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/24

---

Action brought on 9 June 2006 — Italian Republic v Commission

(Case T-157/06)

(2006/C 190/44)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: Paolo Gentili, Avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the European Commission's Memorandum No 2984 of 31 March 2006 concerning the PEP Sicilia Programme (claim for payment No 2005 0601) containing a request to ‘comply with the conditions set out in Commissioner Barnier's letter of 29 July 2003 as to the eligibility of payments on account made in the contex of aid schemes’, together with all connected and prior acts. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the European Commission's Memorandum No 2984 of 31 March 2006 concerning the PEP Sicilia Programme (claim for payment No 2005 0601) containing a request to ‘comply with the conditions set out in Commissioner Barnier's letter of 29 July 2003 as to the eligibility of payments on account made in the contex of aid schemes’, together with all connected and prior acts.

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-345/04 Italian Republic v Commission. (1)

Italian Republic

Commission

1

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004, p. 55.

1

---
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 66

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation

and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1999

Mr. SHUSTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure in the One Hundred

Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Transportation

4 and Infrastructure (hereinafter in this resolution referred

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries

8 and expenses, not more than $14,539,260 for the One

9 Hundred Sixth Congress.
2

•HRES 66 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $7,049,818 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1999, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 2000; and

7 (2) not more than $7,489,442 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 2000, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 2001.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HealthSouth Corporation. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                |   |
|   | By:    | /s/         DOUGLAS E. COLTHARP             |   |
|   |   | Name:   Douglas E. Coltharp                                               |   |
|   |   | Title:     Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                                                                                |   |
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 50

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. FROST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 are hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr.

5 Fattah of Pennsylvania and Mr. Davis of Florida.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 583 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 279
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 583

                          [Report No. 106-873]

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 
940) to designate the Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2000

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 
940) to designate the Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 940) to designate 
the Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area, and for other purposes, 
with Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the House, without 
intervention of any point of order, a single motion offered by the 
chairman of the Committee on Resources or his designee that the House 
concur in the Senate amendments. The Senate amendments and the motion 
shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Resources. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption without 
intervening motion or demand for division of the question.

                                                 House Calendar No. 279

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 583

                          [Report No. 106-873]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 
940) to designate the Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 20, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
### §994. Military working dogs: veterinary care for retired military working dogs

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Defense may establish and maintain a system to provide for the veterinary care of retired military working dogs. No funds may be provided by the Federal Government for this purpose.

(b) Eligible Dogs.—A retired military working dog eligible for veterinary care under this section is any military working dog adopted under section 2583 of this title.

(c) Standards of Care.—The veterinary care provided under the system authorized by this section shall meet such standards as the Secretary shall establish and from time to time update.

(Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title III, §371(b)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1706.)
#### Joseph S. Atkins v. Timothy E. Fitzpatrick.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
### SUBCHAPTER I—COMMENCEMENT OF A CASE
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 488 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 217
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 488

                          [Report No. 106-605]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2000

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of May 4, 2000, providing 
for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany 
the bill (H.R. 434) to authorize a new trade and investment policy for 
sub-Sahara Africa, or any amendment reported in disagreement from a 
conference thereon.
                                                 House Calendar No. 217

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 488

                          [Report No. 106-605]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 3, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)














Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Accelerated Acquisitions XIX, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date:  January 15, 2015




/s Timothy Neher


Paul Falco Principal Executive Officer


and Principal Accounting Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIX, INC. and will be retained byACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIX, INC.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 39.102 What is academic base funding?

Academic base funding is the ADM times the weighted student unit.
§ 63.18 Are the requirements for Bureau of Indian Affairs adjudication different from the requirements for Indian tribes and tribal organizations? Yes. ( a ) In addition to the minimum requirements for background investigations found in § 63.12, *Bureau of Indian Affairs'* adjudicating officials must review the OPM National Agency Check and Inquiries which includes a search of the OPM Security/Suitability Investigations Index (SII) and the Defense Clearance and Investigations Index (DCII), and any additional standards which may be established by the BIA.
( b ) *All* Bureau of Indian Affairs employees who have regular contact with or control over Indian children must be reinvestigated every five years during their employment in that or any other position which allows regular contact with or control over Indian children.
( c ) *Indian tribes and tribal organizations* may adopt these additional requirements but are not mandated to do so by law.
#### STATE v. McCOMBS

No. 107P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 510

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.