alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 656

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Government

of India should take immediate steps to end the human rights abuses

by government forces in India, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 2000

Mr. TOWNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the Government of India should take immediate steps

to end the human rights abuses by government forces

in India, and for other purposes.

Whereas significant human rights abuses exist in India despite extensive constitutional and statutory safeguards;

Whereas these human rights abuses involve political killings

by government forces, including the deaths of persons

being held in custody, and the manipulation of physical

evidence to provide false justifications for the use of lethal force;

Whereas human rights abuses are particularly evident in the

state of Jammu and Kashmir and several northeastern

states in India;
2

•HRES 656 IH

Whereas the human rights abuses include the disappearance,

torture, and killing of people by government forces;

Whereas, although the Constitution of India provides for freedom of religion, violence and intolerance are perpetrated

against many religious groups in India, including Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, and Hindus;

Whereas such violence and intolerance occur in many parts

of India, particularly at the state and local levels;

Whereas the failure of the Government of India to protect

these religious groups has abridged their right to religious freedom;

Whereas during the last 18 months Christians, in particular,

have been attacked or killed and have had their houses

of worship destroyed;

Whereas extensive legal and societal discrimination as well as

violence, including female bondage and forced prostitution, occur against women in India; and

Whereas the use of child labor in India remains a serious

human rights problem: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the Government of India should take imme4 diate steps to end the human rights abuses per5 petrated by government forces in India;

6 (2) the Government of India should enforce the

7 constitutional right to freedom of religion by pro8 tecting the people of India from religiously moti9 vated violence and intolerance;
3

•HRES 656 IH

1 (3) the Government of India should develop

2 policies to end the discrimination and violence faced

3 by women in Indian society;

4 (4) the Government of India should develop

5 policies to end the use of child labor in India; and

6 (5) the United States should consider the ex7 tent to which the Government of India has acted in

8 conformity with the principles expressed in para9 graphs (1) through (4) as a factor in future deci10 sions regarding the allocation of foreign assistance.

Æ
Exhibit 99.8







KPMG LLP

205 5th Avenue SW

Suite 3100

Calgary AB

T2P 4B9

Telephone (403) 691-8000

Fax (403) 691-8008

www.kpmg.ca



Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors Pembina Pipeline Corporation



We consent to the use of our reports, each
dated February 23, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting included in this annual report on Form 40-F.



We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of such reports in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-187938) of Pembina Pipeline Corporation.







Chartered Professional Accountants



February 23, 2017

Calgary, Canada





KPMG LLP is a Canadian
limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International
Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
### SUBCHAPTER IX–A—MORTGAGE INSURANCE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT AND NEW COMMUNITIES
### Part B—Reinsurance Coverage
# United States Court of Appeals **For the First Circuit**

No. 00-1234, 00-1342, 00-1343, 00-1344, 00-1345, 00-1399, 00-1400, 00- 1401, 00-1402, 00-1403, 00-1404 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,

v. WILLIAM M. DAVIS, et al., Defendant, Appellee.

________________________ ASHLAND, INC., et al., Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court issued on August 17, 2001, is amended as follows: On the cover sheets of Volumes I and II, the following should be added as a fourth paragraph under listed counsel: Mark O. Denehy , Joseph Avanzato , and Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. , onthe brief for appellees BASF Corporation, CNA Holdings, Inc., DorrOliver Incorporated; Englehard Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Lucent Technologies, Inc., Mine Safety Appliances Company, Ortho Diagnostics Systems, Inc., Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, Permacel, Inc., Quantum, Inc., and Warner-Lambert Company.
### [§2317. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §821(a)(2), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1704]

Section, added Pub. L. 98–525, title XII, §1215, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2592, related to encouragement of competition and cost savings.
#### § 39.405 How will verifications be conducted?

The eligibility of every student shall be verified. The ELO will take a random sampling of five days with a minimum of one day per grading period to verify the information in § 39.404(c). The ELO will verify the count for the count period and verify residency during the remainder of the year.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

86-19 

August 26, 1986 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4221(e) Resolution of Disputes. Employer Informantion Request 

OPINION: 

This responds to your request that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) review certain actions that

you believe are in in violation of the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act (MPPAA). Specifically, you allege

that a multiemployer pension plan is acting unreasonably and in violation of section 4221(e) of MPPAA by demanding

payment of eleven hundred dollars before computing your client's potential withdrawal liability. 

Section 4301(a) of MPPAA provides a right of civil action for any party adversely affected by another party's actions

or omissions under MPPAA's provisions. Ordinarily, the PBGC does not become involved in disputes where this remedy

is available. Further, in your situation, a court may be in a better position than the PBGC to evaluate the reasonableness

of the pension plan's position. 

If you have further questions, please contact the attorney handling this matter, John Foster, of the PBGC's Corporate

Policy and Regulations Department. His telephone number is 202-956-5050. 

Edward R. Mackiewicz 

General Counsel
### [§2410k. Renumbered §4704]
§ 39.807 How will the Student Unit Value be adjusted annually? ( a ) The student unit instructional value (SUIV) and the student unit residential value (SURV) will be adjusted annually to derive the current year Student Unit Value (SUV) by dividing the calculated SUIV and the SURV into two parts and adjusting each one as shown in this section. ( 1 ) The first part consists of 85 percent of the calculated SUIV and the SURV. OIEP will adjust this portion using the personnel cost of living increase of the Department of Defense schools for each year.
( 2 ) The second part consists of 15 percent the calculated SUIV and the SURV. OIEP will adjust this portion using the Consumer Price Index-Urban of the Department of Labor.
( b ) If the student unit value amount is not fully funded, the schools will receive their pro rata share using the Indian School Equalization Formula.
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.49 Fair and uniform provision of services. ( a ) Grants awarded under this part shall include provisions assuring compliance with the Indian Civil Rights Act; prohibiting discriminatory distinctions among eligible Indian beneficiaries; and assuring the fair and uniform provision by the grantees of the services and assistance they provide to eligible Indian beneficiaries under such grants. Such procedures must include criteria by which eligible Indian beneficiaries will receive services, recordkeeping mechanisms adequate to verify the fairness and uniformity of services in cases of formal complaints, and an explanation of what rights will be afforded an individual pending the resolution of a complaint.
( b ) Indian beneficiaries of the services to be rendered under a grant shall be afforded access to administrative or judicial bodies empowered to adjudicate complaints, claims, or grievances brought by such Indian beneficiaries against the grantee arising out of the performance of the grant.
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.118 Do these “construction contract” regulations apply to construction management services? No. Construction management services may be contracted separately under section 108 of the Act. Construction management services consultants and/or Indian tribe or tribal organization employees assist and advise the Indian tribe or tribal organization to implement construction contracts, but have no contractual relationship with or authority to direct construction contract subcontractors. ( a ) If the Indian tribe or tribal organization chooses to contract solely for construction management services, these services shall be limited to: ( 1 ) Coordination and exchange of information between the Indian tribe or tribal organization and the Secretary;
( 2 ) Review of work produced by the Secretary to determine compliance with: ( i ) The POR and design contract during the design stage; or
( ii ) The project construction documents during the construction stage;
( 3 ) Disputes shall be resolved in accordance with the disputes clause of the CMS contract.
( b ) If the Indian tribe or tribal organization conducts CMS under section 108 of the Act and the Indian tribe or tribal organization contracts separately under this subpart for all or some of the activities in § 900.110, the contracted activities shall be limited to: ( 1 ) Coordination and exchange of information between the Indian tribe or tribal organization and Secretary;
( 2 ) Preparation of tribal or tribal organization construction subcontract scope of work identification and subcontract preparation, and competitive selection of tribal or tribal organization construction contract subcontractors;
( 3 ) Review of work produced by tribal or tribal organization construction subcontractors to determine compliance with: ( i ) The POR and the design contract during the design stage; or
( ii ) The project construction documents during the construction stage.
Rider to Customer Agreement


 March 26, 2008 
 Rider to the 
 Commodity Futures Account Documents (the “Agreement”) 
 Between 
 Demeter Management Corporation on
behalf of each Customer listed on Schedule A 
 “Separately and Not Jointly” 
 And Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated 
 Dated July 23, 2007 
 Schedule A to the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the Schedule A thereto with the attached Schedule A dated March 26, 2008. Demeter Management Corporation
on behalf of each Customer listed on Schedule A agrees it will provide Morgan Stanley &Co. Incorporated with fund-specific updated information for the Commodity Futures Account Information (if any) portion of the Agreement. 
 Accepted and Agreed: 
 Demeter Management Corporation on behalf of each Fund
Listed on the attached Schedule A 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Walter Davis

	Name:	 	Walter Davis
	Title:	 	President
	
	Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Craig Abruzzo

	Name:	 	Craig Abruzzo
	Title:	 	Managing Director







 Schedule A 
  


			
	 Customer
	  	TaxID
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Altis I, LLC
	  	20-8528951
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Aspect I, LLC
	  	20-8852411
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Blenheim I, LLC
	  	20-8528957
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Chesapeake I, LLC
	  	20-8852501
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Cornerstone I, LLC
	  	20-8852546
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures DKR I, LLC
	  	20-8529012
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Kaiser I, LLC
	  	20-8852620
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Transtrend I, LLC
	  	20-8529012
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Transtrend II, LLC
	  	20-8529352
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures WCM I, LLC
	  	20-8852756
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Campbell I, LLC
	  	26-2246160
		
	 Morgan Stanley Managed Futures GMF I, LLC
	  	26-2271749
# C_2006326EN.01006901.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/69

---

Action brought on 23 November 2006 — Panrico S.L. v OHIM — HDN Development (‘Krispy Kreme DOUGHNUTS’)

(Case T-317/06)

(2006/C 326/144)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Panrico S.L. (Unipersonal) (Santa Perpètua de Mogola, Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: D. Pellisé Irquiza, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: HDN Development Corporation

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 August 2006 in the appeal in Case R 0194/2005-1 relating to opposition proceedings No B 303 992 which refused Community trade mark application No 1 298 785; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 August 2006 in the appeal in Case R 0194/2005-1 relating to opposition proceedings No B 303 992 which refused Community trade mark application No 1 298 785;

| — | order the Office and HDN Development Corporation the applicant for Community trade mark No 1 298 785 to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office and HDN Development Corporation the applicant for Community trade mark No 1 298 785 to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: HDN Development Corporation.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark with the words ‘KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS’ (Application No 1 298 785) for goods in Classes 25 and 30 and for services in Class 42.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish word marks ‘DOGHNUTS’ (No 1 288 926) and ‘DONUT’ (No 399 563) for goods in Class 30 and the figurative mark ‘donuts’ for goods in Class 25 and services in Class 42.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition dismissed.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark. The applicant submits, in that regard, that the Community trade mark which is the subject of these proceedings has as its main component the word ‘DOUGHNUTS’, which may be confused with the family of opposing marks DONUT-DONUTS-DOGHNUTS applied to the same goods and services, giving rise to a serious risk of confusion on the part of the Spanish public.

---
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a)/RULE 15d-14(a) UNDER

THE EXCHANGE ACT

I, Daniel
Rodriguez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Cencosud S.A.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)[intentionally omitted];

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The
companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 7, 2013



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Daniel Rodriguez   
|    |  | Daniel Rodriguez       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 579 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 579

  Providing for the concurrence by the House with an amendment in the 
                     Senate amendment to H.R. 1651.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2000

   Mr. Young of Alaska submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for the concurrence by the House with an amendment in the 
                     Senate amendment to H.R. 1651.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution the House shall 
be considered to have taken from the Speaker's table the bill H.R. 
1651, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to have concurred in the 
Senate amendment with the following amendment:
    Page 1, line 4, strike ``sec. 401. use of aircraft prohibited.'' 
and all that follows through ``sec. 402.'', and insert ``sec. 401.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §9771. Acceptance of donations: land for mobilization, training, supply base, aviation field, or space mission-related facility

The Secretary of the Air Force may accept for the United States a gift of—

(1) land that he considers suitable and desirable for a permanent mobilization, training, or supply base; and

(2) land that he considers suitable and desirable for an aviation field or space mission-related facility, if the gift is from a citizen of the United States and its terms authorize the use of the property by the United States for any purpose.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 588; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(e)(16)(A), (B), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3818.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9771 | 10:1342.10:1344. | Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 418 (6th and 8th pars. under "Office of the Chief Signal Officer"), 39 Stat. 622, 623. |

10:1344.

10:1344 (last 40 words) is omitted as executed. The words "tract or tracts", in 10:1342 and 1344, are omitted as surplusage. The words "and remount station", in 10:1342, are omitted, since the property and civilian personnel of the Remount Service of the Quartermaster Corps were transferred to the Department of Agriculture by the Act of April 21, 1948, ch. 224, 62 Stat. 197 (7 U.S.C. 436–438). The words "by the United States for any purpose" are substituted for the words "for any other service of the United States which may hereafter appear desirable", in 10:1342. The words "from any person", in 10:1344, are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §923(e)(16)(B), amended section catchline generally. Prior to amedment, catchline read as follows: "Acceptance of donations: land for mobilization, training, supply base, or aviation field".

Par. (2). Pub. L. 116–283, §923(e)(16)(A), inserted "or space mission-related facility" after "aviation field".
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Orit Mizrachi, the interim Chief Financial Officer (performing the functions of Principal Financial Officer) of Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 27, 2015/s/ Orit MizrachiOrit Mizrachi
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(performing the functions of Principal
Financial Officer)




|* | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 700.105 Utility charges.

Utility charges means the cost for heat, lighting, hot water, electricity, natural gas, butane, propane, wood, coal or other fuels water, sewer and trash removal.