alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         635,596
<SECURITIES>                                63,353,047
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,760,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (280,891)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            67,480,878
<PP&E>                                     132,397,425
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,232,567)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             268,691,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,038,204
<BONDS>                                    180,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       166,555
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,924,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               268,691,946
<SALES>                                      3,509,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,509,026
<CGS>                                        2,712,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,712,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,936,806
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,304,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,086,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,086,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,086,940)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)


</TABLE>
```

[109th Congress Public Law 427]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ427.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 2912]]

Public Law 109-427
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to accept the donation of a 
  bust depicting Sojourner Truth and to display the bust in a suitable 
    location in the Capitol. <<NOTE: Dec. 20, 2006 -  [H.R. 4510]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds as follows:
            (1) Sojourner Truth was a towering figure among the founders 
        of the movement for women's suffrage in the United States, and 
        no monument that does not include her can accurately represent 
        this important development in our Nation's history.
            (2) The statue known as the Portrait Monument, originally 
        presented to Congress in 1920 in honor of the passage of the 
        Nineteenth Amendment guaranteeing women the right to vote and 
        presently exhibited in the rotunda of the Capitol, portrays 
        several early suffragists who were Sojourner Truth's 
        contemporaries but not Sojourner Truth herself, the only African 
        American among the group.
SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE AND DISPLAY OF BUST OF SOJOURNER TRUTH IN 
                    CAPITOL.

    (a) Acceptance of Donation of Bust.-- <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Not later 
than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Joint 
Committee on the Library shall accept the donation of a bust depicting 
Sojourner Truth, subject to such terms and conditions as the Joint 
Committee considers appropriate.

    (b) Display.--The Joint Committee shall place the bust accepted 
under subsection (a) in a suitable permanent location in the Capitol.

    Approved December 20, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4510:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    Dec. 18, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Dec. 6, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[109th Congress Public Law 466]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ466.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 3484]]

Public Law 109-466
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To clarify certain land use in Jefferson County, Colorado. <<NOTE: Dec. 
                        22, 2006 -  [S. 4092]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND USE IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, 
            COLORADO.

    Notwithstanding any applicable State or local land use or 
condemnation laws or regulations, and subject to all applicable Federal 
laws and regulations, any person that holds an approved Federal 
Communications Commission permit to construct or install either a 
digital television broadcast station antenna or tower, or both, located 
on Lookout Mountain in Jefferson County in the State of Colorado, may, 
at such location, construct, install, use, modify, replace, repair, or 
consolidate such antenna or tower, or both, and all accompanying 
facilities and services associated with such digital television 
broadcasts, if such antenna or tower is of the same height or lower than 
the tallest existing analog broadcast antenna or tower at such location.

    Approved December 22, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 4092:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 8, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
IV

House Calendar No. 267

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 564

[Report No. 106–795]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4865) to amend the Internal

Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 income tax increase on Social

Security benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 2000

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4865) to amend

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993

income tax increase on Social Security benefits.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

3 4865) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to

4 repeal the 1993 income tax increase on Social Security

5 benefits. The bill shall be considered as read for amend6 ment. All points of order against the bill and against its

7 consideration are waived. The amendment recommended
2

HRES 564 RH

1 by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the

2 bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous question

3 shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended,

4 and on any further amendment thereto to final passage

5 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate

6 on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by

7 the chairman and ranking minority member of the Com8 mittee on Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment

9 printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom10 panying this resolution, if offered by Representative Pom11 eroy of North Dakota or his designee, which shall be in

12 order without intervention of any point of order, shall be

13 considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for

14 one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent

15 and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with

16 or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 267

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 564

[Report No. 106–795]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4865)

to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 torepeal the 1993 income tax increase on SocialSecurity benefits.

JULY 26, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### Michael Matteo, Respondent, v. Thomas J. Reilly, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, as against the weight of evidence, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, unless the plaintiff consent to reduce the judgment to six dollars, in which event the judgment as reduced is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**IDEAEDGE, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IdeaEdge, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Collas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### Elias Wolf Lewin-Epstein and Others, Doing Business under the Name of Carmel Wine Company, Appellants, *v.*Palestine Hebrew Wine Company, Respondent.

Appeal from an order denying a motion for an injunction.

Per Curiam:

Without expressing any opinion upon the merits, and leaving the questions of fact as to the right of the plaintiff to relief to be determined by the trial judge upon the trial of the action, we think the order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements." Present — Tngraha m, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements,
tte-44 1 , J. Hardesty

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2 No. 63096

LANALSIKOV LOWE, Petitioner,
vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.



### ORDER DENYING PETITIONS
Docket Nos. 63107, 63108, and 63109 are proper person petitions for a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, prohibition. Docket No. 63096 is a proper person petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner requests that the charges pending against him be dismissed with prejudice and that various attorneys and the district court judge be charged with crimes and/or suspended from the practice of law. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in these matters. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330; NRS 34.360; NRS 34.370; NRS 34.700; NRS 34.710. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petitions DENIED.

### cc: Lanalsikov Lowe Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Clark County Public Defender Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 

### 3

EMILV E111 1
#### Davis et al. v. Kinnard.

(Decided Jan. 25, 1938.)

E. SELBY WIGGINS for appellants.

E. C. McDOUGLE for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Stites — -

Affirming.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Madison circuit court under which certain real estate belonging-to the appellants was ordered to be sold for the satisfac*647tion of a mortgage given to the appellee. Appellant S.. F. Davis owned an undivided one-third interest, subject to the life interest of his mother, in one of the tracts mortgaged, and the remaining two-thirds interest belonged to other persons. Appellants’ joint tenants were-not joined in the suit. It is asserted that the appraisers appointed to determine the value of the various properties mortgaged did not take into consideration the life estate in appellant’s one-third undivided interest and. that a number of contiguous lots likewise mortgaged were appraised as one tract instead of being valued, separately.

It seems obvious that the other persons having an interest in the same tract in which appellant S. F. Davis owned an undivided one-third interest in remainder were not necessary parties. The interest of one coparcener or joint tenant may be sold without making the-others parties to the action. Newman’s Pleading & Practice, 3d Ed., vol. 1, sec. 178a; Johnson v. Jacob, 74 Ky. 646, 11 Bush 646; Sneed’s Heirs v. Waring, 41 Ky. 522, 2 B. Mon. 522.

No exceptions were filed to the commissioner’s report of sale, and the court confirmed the sale and directed the execution of deeds to the purchaser. Even, if it be conceded that the action of the appraisers was. improper and that they should have appraised appellant’s one-third interest apart from the life estate and. each of the building lots separately, their actions would, at most have rendered the sale voidable, and, in the absence of proper exceptions to the report of sale, the-questions are not before us. Caudle v. Luttrell, 183 Ky. 551, 209 S. W. 497; Fidelity *&*Columbia Trust Co. v. White Const. Co., 258 Ky. 475, 80 S. W. (2d) 550.

Judgment affirmed.
# 9 U.S . Departmen t o f Transportation . Offic e o f th e Secretar

yo f Transportatio n DESIGNATIO NO FAGEN T FO R

SERVIC EO FNOTICE , PROCESS , ORDER S DECISION S AN D REQUIREMENT S Chief , Documentary Service s Div . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Washington , DC . 2059 0 ATTENTION : DOCKE T SECTION . C-5 5

_ , havin g it s principa l (Nam e o f Company , pleas e print ) 

# offic e a t h ( /! ? sr^ceiVif

t 'b 9 0(9-90 ; froiveszMft ( 

# ?oc s ^ (Address ) hereb y designates , pursuan t t o sectio n 4610 3 o f

Titl e 4 9 o f

th e U.S . Cod e (formerl y sectio n1005(b ) o f th e Federa l Aviatio n Ac t o f 1958 , a s amended ) th e perso nname dbelo w a s it s Agen t upo nwho mservic e o f

al l notice s an dprocess , an dal l orders , decisions , andrequirement s o f

th e Departmen t

o f Transportatio nmay b e mad e for ando nbehal f

o f sai dcarrier , hereb y canceling al l previou s designation s o f

agent s mad e b y it

t o th e DOT . Nam e o f Agen t C2 A <e & T~ r

£ < v / ~ P^TZ A^dO^DSK ) (Pleas e Print ) 

### Addres s /<P33 & AlpjJ ^^ T doZAL /fo/z/gp S f L.*33^6 ^ Th e Agen t

s o designate dha s writte nhi s nam e an dals o hi s initial s inth e followin g space :



# L ^ Nam e < C A <? s 7

<S /Z. ^J . /A£-A-id^)oJS)<i(Initials ) 

# f

I N WITNES S WHEREO F"PoL-S^l g L'{V' £iX>$K7& "f.o t ^ , ft (Nam e o f Company ) present s t o b e signe din it s nam e b y f'gT g POfrBC ICY - f^O p ha s cause dthes e

, Presiden t (Pleas e Print ) o f sai dcompany , an dt o b e atteste dunde r it s corporat e seal b y 

## i thi s 5 Ihyda

y o f WoveUAbPX

ATTEST : ^^^-(iSEcretary , o r

othe r officer) OST F 1010. 5 (1-95 ) 

# C f o ^QAZ (Secretary , o r othe r Title ) ( T'( / ~-" (Name o f Company )
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 88

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. THOMAS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 he is hereby, elected to the following standing committees

3 of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE:

5 Mr. Isakson.

6 COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRA7 STRUCTURE: Mr. Isakson.

Æ
#### Henry O. Dusenberry and Charles E. Dusenberry, Appellants, v. Boston and Maine Railroad, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. All concurred, except Kellogg, J., dissenting.
#### Phillip V. R. Stanton, Appellant, *v.*Elizabeth R. B. King, impleaded, etc., Respondent.

(Argued March 26, 1877;

decided April 3, 1877.)

Reported below, 8 Hun, 4.

*Philip S. Crooke,*for appellant.

*James C. Hays,*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                      CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  KeySpan   Corporation   (the
"Corporation")  for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert B. Catell,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                     /s/Robert B. Catell
                                     -------------------
                                     Name: Robert B. Catell
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                     Date: August 6, 2003

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to KeySpan Corporation and will be retained by KeySpan Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Our Agency    -  Leadership      -  Chris Bargery             
    -  Lewis Ratchford Jr             
    -  Shelley A Verdejo             
    -  Dr. James A. Day             
    -  Woodrow G. Kusse 
  -  Publications             
  -  Our Mission, Vision & Values             
  -  History             
  -  PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)             
  -  PFPA Extranet (CAC Only) 
-  Topics    -  Visiting the Pentagon             
  -  CAC Issuance             
  -  Parking Information             
  -  Flags Over Pentagon             
  -  Vehicle Towing             
  -  Reporting Suspicious Activity             
  -  Lost & Found 
-  Careers		 
-  Contact		 

HomeTopicsFlags Over Pentagon

**HOME /  PRIVACY ACT  /   NO FEAR ACT /   ACCESSIBILITY  /  FOIA  /  QUICK LINKSPFPA Extranet (CAC Only)   /   PFPA Intranet (PFPA Only)**

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

81-9 

April 30, 1981 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4062 Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your request for an advisory opinion with respect to the potential liability of A under section

4062(d) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") under the circumstances described below.

A proposes to purchase certain B Corporation * * * assets, relating to B truck manufacturing business in the United

States and Canada, in exchange for A assumption of certain enumerated liabilities of B to secured creditors and

unsecured lender and vendor creditors. Additionally, Consolidated proposes to acquire the assets and assume the

liabilities of the B pension plan for union employees at the * * *, Virginia plant and certain truck branches and the

pension plans of C Corporation, a B subsidiary. However, A proposes to assume these pension plans only if the net

liability of the plans does not exceed $686,000. 

From discussion between your staff and mine, I understand you to recognize that with respect to the pension plans

which A does assume, A will be liable to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") under section 4062

of ERISA in the event that any of the assumed plans should terminate. [*2] The amount of such liability to the PBGC

under section 4062 of ERISA would not be limited by any agreement between A and B. 

Based on the facts as you have represented them, we would not regard A as a successor corporation to B with respect

to any existing plans maintained by B and not assumed by A. 

I hope this response is helpful to you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.104 Must a Tribe enact Tribal laws, regulations, or procedures permitting a person or entity to allege that a Tribe is not complying with a TERA?

No. A Tribe is not required, but may elect, to enact Tribal laws, regulations, or procedures permitting a person or entity that may be an interested party to allege that a Tribe is not complying with its TERA.
-  Home 
-  Leadership 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

## Contact Us

Office of the Chief Financial Officer
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-366-4433****Fax:**202-366-3666**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Chief Financial Officer

## Jon Gatti

Jon Gatti is the Chief Financial Officer for the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). As PHMSA's CFO, Mr. Gatti leads all budget, finance, acquisitions, and information technology (IT) operations for the agency.  This includes responsibility for direction, coordination and control of PHMSA fiscal plans, programs, policies and complex budget structure. He advises on PHMSA financial management and budgetary matters including the availability of appropriations and allocation of grants and other program funds, audit issues, financial management initiatives, and any matter that could affect the financial resources, while aligning all financial budget objectives with PHMSA's strategic goals.  

Prior to joining PHMSA, Mr. Gatti served as the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Deputy CFO from 2016 to April, 2020.  In that role, he led all aspects of FHWA’s budget and financial operations, including the oversight of a $48 billion budget, management of the fiscal management system, and development of financial policy.  From 2011 – 2016, Mr. Gatti served as FHWA’s Budget Director, and from 2008 – 2011, as a Budget Analyst.   Prior to joining FHWA, he worked in the private sector with over 10 years’ experience in the accounting and finance field.