alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006218EN.01000101.xml

| 9.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 September 2006

(2006/C 218/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2713 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4607 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3195 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5817 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,88 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2185 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5763 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,305 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9775 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5220 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,575 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8802 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6777 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4155 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8878 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9862 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9979 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 215,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3399 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1049 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3640 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 602,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,655 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,137 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2713

JPY

Japanese yen

147,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4607

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67930

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3195

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5817

ISK

Iceland króna

90,88

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2185

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5763

CZK

Czech koruna

28,305

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9775

RON

Romanian leu

3,5220

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,575

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8802

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6777

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4155

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8878

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9862

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9979

KRW

South Korean won

1 215,81

ZAR

South African rand

9,3399

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1049

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3640

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 602,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,655

PHP

Philippine peso

64,137

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0300

THB

Thai baht

47,610

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 169.415 How will BIA conduct compliance and enforcement when there is a life estate on the tract? ( a ) We may monitor the use of the land, as appropriate, and will enforce the terms of the right-of-way on behalf of the owners of the remainder interests, but will not be responsible for enforcing the right-of-way on behalf of the life tenant.
( b ) The life tenant may not cause or allow permanent injury to the land.
# C_2006155EN.01001201.xml

| 4.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4227 — Umicore/Solvay/Solvicore/JV)

(2006/C 155/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4227. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4227. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 24, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 24, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0412. DAVID DERUSHA v. JUDGE DAVID BURROUGHS et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CV1750
#### § 558.1 Scope of this part.

Unless a tribal-state compact assigns responsibility to an entity other than a tribe, the licensing authority for class II or class III gaming is a tribal authority. The procedures and standards of this part apply only to licenses for primary management officials and key employees. This part does not apply to any license that is intended to expire within 90 days of issuance.
### Miscellaneous Administrative Provisions
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 24, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291.

*1. Western State Agency, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Devils Lake, North Dakota,*                     to become a bank holding company by acquiring over 25 percent of the voting shares of Western State Agency, and thereby indirectly acquire Western State Bank, both in Devils Lake, North Dakota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 22, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-4288 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Update

As of March 31, 2023

Joint Task Force – Red Hill is currently ON PLAN to safely defuel the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility by June 2024

DoD Repairs Completed

129/253

Start Complete

Number of Validated Repairs Submitted 

to DOH for Review/Approval

Next 90 Days April 2023 May 2023 June 2023

April 5: JBPHH Info Fair (CAC holders)

April 6: Response Drill

April 12: Red Hill Special Committee Tour

April 17-21: Dewatering1

May 17: DISF

2 Fourth Meeting

May 23-24: Defueling Open House

May 31: Projected DoD Repairs Complete

June 6: FTAC

2 – Hosted by DOH

June 8: Response Drill

June 9: NEPA

2 Public Comment Period Begins

June 15: NEPA Public Meeting

June 30: NEPA Public Comment Period Ends

3

rd Party Quality Validation Completed 

56/253

Start Complete

Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Dashboard

As of April 4, 2023

Dashboard Legend 2

DISF: Defueling Information Sharing Forum

FTAC: Fuel Tank Advisory Committee

NEPA: National Environmental Policy Act Third-party quality validation is a means 

of confirming standards of quality have 

been met for all repairs to ensure safety 

and protect the environment. 

What is 3

rd Party 

Quality Validation?

Next Key Milestone ... 

DEWATERING1. What is it?

Dewatering removes water from the tanks to 

ensure quality of fuel and to prevent corrosion. 

To learn more about this process, click the link 

here. 

Start Complete

Key Events

56/253
### [§2311. Renumbered §3065]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 585 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 21, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 5109) to amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the personnel 
system of the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes. The bill 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the 
Committee on Veterans' Affairs now printed in the bill shall be considered as 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Veterans' Affairs; (2) the further amendment printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by 
Representative Stump of Arizona, Representative Evans of Illinois, or a 
designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order or 
demand for division of the question, shall be considered as read, and shall be 
separately debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
JOINT TASK FORCE – RED HILL

This brief is classified:

Discussion up to:

Classified by:

Derived from:

Declassify on:

JTF-Red Hill

Defueling Fire Protection

14 April 2023

As of 06 1540 MAR 2023

JTF Red Hill Planning Directorate

Multiple Sources

Enclosure 1

Markings Removed Markings Removed Markings Removed Markings Removed Markings Removed
### §8854. Effect of failure to start proceedings

If a vessel is captured as prize and no proceedings for adjudication are started within a reasonable time, any party claiming the captured property may, in any district court as a court of prize—

(1) move for a monition to show cause why such proceedings shall not be started; or

(2) bring an original suit for restitution.

The monition issued in either case shall be served on the United States Attorney for the district, on the Secretary of the Navy, and on such other persons as are designated by order of the court.

(Aug. 10, 1956. ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 475, §7654; renumbered §8854, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7654 | 34 U.S.C. 1141 (last sentence). | R.S. 4625 (last sentence). |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7654 of this title as this section.

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 12.62 Who decides what uniform an Indian country law enforcement officer can wear and who pays for it?

Each local law enforcement program must establish its own uniform requirements for patrol and detention personnel. Uniformed BIA police officers may be paid an annual uniform allowance not to exceed $400. Local programs may provide uniforms and related equipment to officers in lieu of this payment. All law enforcement officers must also have their official identification on their person at all times when performing law enforcement duties. Uniforms, when worn, will be plainly distinguishable from the uniforms of any non-law enforcement personnel working on the reservation.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-68 

May 19, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4004(f)(4) Temporary Authority. Waiver of Employer Liability 

OPINION: 

 We have considered the Petition for Waiver of * * * dated May 30, 1975, as supplemented by your letter of

December 22, 1975. 

* * * requested a complete waiver of the liability * * * imposed by Section 4062 of the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"), 29 U.S.C.A. § 1362 (1975). Pursuant to Section 4004(f) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. *

* * § 1304(f), the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") may grant such a waiver during the first 270 days

after enactment of the Act upon a showing that the waiver is necessary to avoid undue hardship. By a Resolution of May

30, 1975, the Board of Directors of the PBGC waived liability imposed by Section 4062 subject to subsequent

confirmation that the imposition of said liability in whole or in part would cause an undue hardship to the employers

involved and that the employers were not able, as a practical matter, to continue the plans. 

* * * has submitted information to the PBGC to provide * * * confirmation that imposition of Section 4062 liability

would constitute an undue hardship. This information included the May 30, 1975 Petition for Waiver and exhibits [*2]

thereto, the December 22, 1975 supplementary letter, and * * * SEC * * * Form 10-K for 1974. 

Arguments raised include the fact that the decision to close * * * arose prior to the enactment of the Act; that the

* * * Pension Plan (the "Plan") itself provided for cessation of employer liability when the Plan was terminated; and that

* * * always funded at the maximum deductible rate. Moreover, * * * asserted that the unfunded liability was primarily

due to the advanced age of the * * * workers and the substantial unfunded liability at the time * * * acquired the plant.

* * * also contended that the imposition of employer liability amounts to a retroactive impairment of contract by

Congress. 

 We recognize that the decision to close * * * was for a legitimate business purpose, i.e., to avoid continuing losses,

and that imposing employer liability on * * * will add to those losses. But we believe that these circumstances do not

make a waiver necessary to avoid the "unreasonable hardship" which Congress contemplated in Section 4004(f)(4), since

the circumstances you describe are not unusual upon termination of a plan. We believe that for the hardship to be

"unreasonable" something [*3] more must be shown. For instance, we have granted a waiver where the employer

demonstrated that he would be unable to continue in business due to imposition of employer liability. 

Accordingly, we have decided not to waive employer liability in this case. Case Officer * * * will communicate with

you further regarding the determination of liability pursuant to Section 4062 of the Act. 

Kenneth L. Houck 

Executive Director
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Reporting & Disclosure 
-  Reporting & Disclosure Overview 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Reporting & Disclosure Overview

Review a summary of PBGC, Department of Labor, and IRS reporting and disclosure requirements.
                          - Department of Labor:  Reporting and Disclosure Guide for Employee Benefit Plans
                          - IRS:  Retirement Plan Reporting and Disclosure Requirements

February 16, 2022
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2011 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2011-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2013.




/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit99.1**

** **

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

 

                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Composite Solutions, Inc. (“Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company hereby certifies,pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on hisknowledge:  1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

 

 

/s/ Dr. Gilbert A. Hegemier

Dr. Gilbert A. Hegemier

 

May 20, 2003

 

 

----
### Appraisal for Farm Loans
### [§2517. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §811(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1845]

Section, added Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §821(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1430, §2525; renumbered §2517 and amended Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4227, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2685; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title IX, §901(j)(4), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4324, established the Office for Foreign Defense Critical Technology Monitoring and Assessment and set out its responsibilities.

A prior section 2517 was renumbered section 2523 of this title and subsequently repealed.
#### § 39.132 Can a school integrate Language Development programs into its regular instructional program?

A school may offer Language Development programs to students as part of its regular academic program. Language Development does not have to be offered as a stand-alone program.
### SUBCHAPTER IX—POWERS AND DUTIES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
IV

House Calendar No. 228

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 511

[Report No. 106–637]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3916) to amend the Internal

Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on telephone and other

communication services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 2000

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3916) to amend

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise

tax on telephone and other communication services.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3916) to

4 amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the

5 excise tax on telephone and other communication services.

6 The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The

7 amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and
2

HRES 511 RH

1 Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopt2 ed. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

3 on the bill, as amended, to final passage without inter4 vening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill,

5 as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chair6 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

7 Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with

8 or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 228

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 511

[Report No. 106–637]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3916)

to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 torepeal the excise tax on telephone and other communication services.

MAY 23, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed