alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPosition Corrections for Airspeed and Flow Angle Measurements on Fixed-Wing AircraftThis report addresses position corrections made to airspeed and aerodynamic flow angle measurements on fixed-wing aircraft. These corrections remove the effects of angular rates, which contribute to the measurements when the sensors are installed away from the aircraft center of mass. Simplified corrections, which are routinely used in practice and assume small flow angles and angular rates, are reviewed. The exact, nonlinear corrections are then derived. The simplified corrections are sufficient in most situations; however, accuracy diminishes for smaller aircraft that incur higher angular rates, and for flight at high air flow angles. This is demonstrated using both flight test data and a nonlinear flight dynamics simulation of a subscale transport aircraft in a variety of low-speed, subsonic flight conditions.Document ID20180000023Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGrauer, Jared A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 3, 2018Publication DateNovember 1, 2017Subject CategoryAerodynamicsAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberL-20882NF1676L-28263NASA/TM-2017-219795Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.07.02.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180000023.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### SUBCHAPTER I—MODULAR OPEN SYSTEM APPROACH IN DEVELOPMENT OF WEAPON SYSTEMS

Sec.
4401.
Requirement for modular open system approach in major defense acquisition programs; definitions.
4402.
Requirement to address modular open system approach in program capabilities development and acquisition weapon system design.
4403.
Requirements relating to availability of major system interfaces and support for modular open system approach.
Order filed July 6, 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00297

- CV

____________ MICHAEL G. CHAPA , Appellant

V.
AURA CECILIA CHAPA , Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. 2019

- 55125



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 28, 2021

. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has bee n filed. S ee Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before July 21, 202 1

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timel y pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.
# C_2006261EN.01002401.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/24

---

Action brought on 30 August 2006 — Austrian Relief Program v Commission

(Case T-235/06)

(2006/C 261/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Austrian Relief Program– Verein für Not- und Katastrophenhilfe (Innsbruck, Austria) (represented by: C. Leyroutz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul Debit Note No 3 240 802 998 of 4 May 2006; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Debit Note No 3 240 802 998 of 4 May 2006; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was selected by the Commission to carry out, within framework of the Obnova programme financed by the European Union, a project in Serbia on the basis of the contract signed on 2 April 1998 (‘the Obnova Contract’). By letter of 4 May 2006 the Commission requested the applicant to repay the whole amount agreed under that contract. By the present action, the applicant challenges this decision.

The applicant alleges, first of all, that the Commission was not competent to adopt the contested decision, on the ground that jurisdiction to hear disputes arising from the Obnova Contract lies with the competent court in Brussels.

The applicant further claims that the defendant infringed essential procedural rules. In particular, the applicant's right to a fair hearing was not granted and the obligation to state reasons under Article 253 EC was infringed. In this connection the applicant criticises also the properly to establish the facts.

Finally, the applicant alleges that the defendant abused its discretion by seeking repayment of the whole amount agreed under the Obnova Contract, despite the fact that the terms of the contract were properly fulfilled and the individual projects properly implemented.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 544 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 25, 2000.
Whereas the United States and Mexico have a long history of close relations and 
        share a wide range of interests;
Whereas the people of the United States and the people of Mexico have extensive 
        cultural and historical ties that bind together families and communities 
        across national boundaries;
Whereas a democratic, peaceful, and prosperous Mexico is of vital importance to 
        the security of the United States;
Whereas a close relationship between the United States and Mexico, based on 
        mutual respect and understanding, is important to the people of both 
        nations;
Whereas Mexican leaders from across the political spectrum and representatives 
        of civil society recognized the need for political and electoral reform 
        and took important steps to achieve these goals;
Whereas on July 2, 2000, nearly two-thirds of all eligible voters in Mexico 
        participated in the national election;
Whereas both domestic and international election observers declared the July 2nd 
        elections to be the fairest and most transparent in Mexico's history;
Whereas the election of Vincente Fox marks the first transition in power at the 
        presidential level in 71 years from the ruling Institutional 
        Revolutionary Party (PRI), completing Mexico's transition to a total 
        multi-party democratic system;
Whereas Vincente Fox, the winning presidential candidate, and Ernesto Zedillo, 
        the current president, have both pledged themselves to a peaceful and 
        cooperative transition of power; and
Whereas this transparent, fair and democratic election should be broadly 
        commended: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the people and Government of the United Mexican 
        States for the successful completion of the democratic multiparty 
        elections for president and the legislature;
            (2) commends all the citizens and political parties of Mexico for 
        their participation in the democratic process and their strong support 
        for the strengthening of their democracy;
            (3) congratulates President-elect Vincente Fox for his election 
        victory and his strong commitment to democracy and a free-market 
        oriented economy; and
            (4) reaffirms the United States friendship with the United Mexican 
        States and our unequivocal commitment to encouraging democracy 
        throughout Latin America.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
CS253565-A

AVOID SPOT TREAT 

FROSTBITE & HYPOTHERMIA

In cold temperatures, your body begins to lose heat faster than it 

can be produced, which can lead to serious health problems.

✴❉✴❉ AVOID ❉✴❉✴

When the weather is extremely cold, try to stay indoors. If you must go outside, 

dress properly and know who is at high risk for hypothermia or frostbite.

When going outside be sure to wear:

A SCARF OR KNIT 

MASK THAT COVERS 

FACE & MOUTH

MITTENS OR GLOVES

WATER-RESISTANT 

BOOTS

A HAT

A WATERRESISTANT COAT

SEVERAL LAYERS 

OF LOOSE-FITTING 

CLOTHING

When going outside in winter make sure body parts most often 

affected by frostbite are covered in warm, dry clothing.

NOSE EARS TOES CHEEKS CHIN FINGERS

Know who is at high risk:

Older adults 

without proper food, 

clothing, or heating

People who stay 

outdoors for long 

periods (homeless, 

hikers, hunters, etc.)

People who drink 

alcohol in excess 

or use illicit drugs

Babies sleeping in 

cold rooms

❄❉❄❉ SPOT ❉❄❉❄

A victim is often unaware of frostbite 

because frozen tissue is numb.

FROSTBITE

Signs & Symptoms

— Redness or pain 

in any skin area 

may be the first 

sign of frostbite.

Other signs 

include:

— a white or 

grayish-yellow 

skin area

— skin that feels 

unusually firm 

or waxy

— numbness

HYPOTHERMIA

Hypothermia often occurs at very cold 

temperatures, but can occur at cool temperatures 

(above 40°F), if a person is wet (from rain, sweat 

or cold water) and becomes chilled.

Signs & Symptoms

Adults:

— shivering

— exhaustion

— confusion

— fumbling hands

— memory loss

— slurred speech

— drowsiness

Infants:

— bright red, 

cold skin

— very low energy

If a person’s temperature is below 95° get medical attention immediately.

✱❅✱❅ TREAT ❅✱❅✱

If a person is experiencing hypothermia or frostbite...

1

SEEK MEDICAL 

ATTENTION 

AS SOON 

AS POSSIBLE

2

GET THEM 

INTO A 

WARM ROOM 

OR SHELTER

3

REMOVE ANY 

WET CLOTHING

4

WARM THEM 

UNDER DRY 

LAYERS OF 

BLANKETS AND 

CLOTHING

5

PLACE AREAS AFFECTED 

BY FROSTBITE IN 

WARM-TO-TOUCH WATER

FROSTBITE CAUT ON

Since skin may be numb, victims of frostbite can harm themselves further. 

Use caution when treating frostbite and:

UNLESS NECESSARY, 

DO NOT WALK ON 

FEET OR TOES

WITH FROSTBITE

1 2

DO NOT USE A 

FIREPLACE, HEAT 

LAMP, RADIATOR, 

OR STOVE FOR 

WARMING

3

DO NOT USE A 

HEATING PAD 

OR ELECTRIC 

BLANKET FOR 

WARMING

4

DO NOT RUB 

OR MASSAGE 

AREAS WITH

FROSTBITE

http://emergency.cdc.gov/disasters/

winter/staysafe/index.asp
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-88 

August 22, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041 Termination by Plan Administrator

4043. Reportable Events

4082(b). Effective Date; Special Rules. Applicability of Title IV to Plan Terminations Occurring Between July 1, 1974

and September 2, 1974 

OPINION: 

 We have reviewed the additional information which you forwarded regarding the notice of termination submitted

on behalf of the * * * Salaried Employees Pension Plan. 

Our tentative determination was based on the fact that the plan had experienced a reduction of participants between

July 31, and September 2, 1974 and the contention that such participant reduction constituted a covered termination

under Section 4082(b) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"). We tentatively concluded

that this reduction of participants did not constitute a termination under Title IV of the Act. The fact that the plan

thereafter experienced further reductions of participants, the aggregate number of which constituted a reportable event,

does not change our determination. A reportable event may or may not constitute grounds for the PBGC to take action

under Title IV of the Act. 

We intend to close the above referenced pre-enactment termination case absent the submission of [*2] additional

information within 30 days of receipt of this letter. However, by this letter, we are not closing the reportable events cases

regarding this plan, which are currently before the Corporation. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
# C_2006186EN.01000902.xml

| 9.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4272 — Fortress/Telent)

(2006/C 186/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4272. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4272. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 214.22 Serving of notices.

Wherever notice is provided for in this part it shall be sufficient if notice has been mailed to the last known place of address of the party, and time shall begin to run with the day next ensuing after the mailing or from the date of delivery of personal notice; but where the party is outside the State of Oklahoma the officer in charge may, in his discretion, increase the time allowed.
### [§673a. Renumbered §12303]
### §879. Art. 79. Conviction of offense charged, lesser included offenses, and attempts

(a) In General.—An accused may be found guilty of any of the following:

(1) The offense charged.

(2) A lesser included offense.

(3) An attempt to commit the offense charged.

(4) An attempt to commit a lesser included offense, if the attempt is an offense in its own right.

(b) Lesser Included Offense Defined.—In this section (article), the term "lesser included offense" means—

(1) an offense that is necessarily included in the offense charged; and

(2) any lesser included offense so designated by regulation prescribed by the President.

(c) Regulatory Authority.—Any designation of a lesser included offense in a regulation referred to in subsection (b) shall be reasonably included in the greater offense.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 65; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5402, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2939.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 879 | 50:673. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 79), 64 Stat. 134. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "An accused may be found guilty of an offense necessarily included in the offense charged or of an attempt to commit either the offense charged or an offense necessarily included therein."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
402 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

ttata Board of Eduoatlon 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sirs: 

this department 

requesting an opinion or 

01 Board* is meant the 

Ftate Board of inroltea two questiona: 

the Texan otir Coast? 

a neaessary, does the -*ate Board 

atlon have authority to issue suah 

8t qu46ti0n, ~4 4n4~4~ in th4 4rrinrstir0. 

ysr Inlets and arms of the Gulf of Mexioo 

ng ben4ath them belong to the State, oonstituting pub110 property that ir held in trust for thr us4 and banerit of the people. 44 T4r. Jur. 125. Suoh landa and the mineral 

estate therein hetc been set apart and dedlaetsd to the publla 

tree nohool fund OS this State. Arta. 54150 and 54210-3, Vernon*a 

Annotated Texas Statutea. IP an operator enters upon the gland 

of another without p4rmlaalon and sets up his instruments to 

teat such land, he is guilty of trespass. Cumners,Oll and Gas 
403 

State Board of Eduoation, page 2 

(perm. ed. ) Sea. 659. The operation of the seismograph mquirea the use of explosivea to oreate vibrations of the 

earth'8 orust. In our opinion, the aonduot of asismogrsph 

operetiona in the bays in question, without the Stats's 

permission, would aonatitute a treepass. 

However, th4 aeaond question must be answered in 

the negative. Publio officers and hoards have cnly those 

powers whlah are 4xpr4aaly oonferred and those whioh are 

reasonably neoesaary to efieotuate their l xpreaa powers. 34 

Tax. Jr. 443-444.,The Constitution of Texas, in Sea. 8, Art. 

VII, provides that the State Board of Eduastloo *shall p4rform 

suoh duties aa nap be preaaribed by law." ~4 have aarerully 

studied the Tsxoa stetutea, partiaulerly Art. 2675b-5, dealing 

with the powers end dutiea of the State Board of Eduaation; end, 

we rind no provision tiich would either expressly,or by impliaation, suthorlas such Boerd to issue a permit to conduot seiamograph operetioas. 

Although we do not here pea8 upon the authority of 

aom other State 4genog to grsnt such a permit, we or11 to your 

attention the atetutea authorizing ths Cammiasioner of the General 

Land 0fl"iae and the Sohool Lend Board to lease the bays along the 

Gulf for the produation of minentla, (Arts. 54210-j and 5421a-5, 

Vernon'8 Annotated Civil Statutes) the pens1 atstute prohibiting 

the use or explosives ja..the mmtera of thia -Stat4 (Art. 924, Tex. 

Penal Code), and the 8ba6ute giving the Qame, Fish and Oyster 

Comiasion oartain $ariadlotloir over Bboh bays inaorar aa their 

use arreota the oonaervstion ot marina llte,(Art. 4026, Vernon’s 

Aanotatsd Texas Statutes). 

Tour8 very truly, 

ATTORNXT GIWWAL OF TXXAS
§ 700.271 Requests for notification of existence of records: Submission. ( a ) *Submission of requests.* ( 1 ) ( i ) An individual desiring to determine under the Privacy Act whether a system of records contains records pertaining to him shall address his inquiry to the system manager having responsibility for the system unless the system notice describing the system prescribes or permits submission to some other official or officials.
( ii ) If a system notice describing a system requires that an individual contact more than two officials concerning the existence of records in the system, an individual desiring to determine whether the system contains records pertaining to him may contact the system manager for assistance in determining which official is most likely to be in possession of records pertaining to that individual.
( 2 ) If an individual desires to determine whether records pertaining to him are maintained in two or more systems, he shall make a separate inquiry concerning each system.
( b ) *Form of request.* ( 1 ) An inquiry to determine whether a system of records contains records pertaining to an individual shall be in writing.
( 2 ) To insure expeditious handling, the request shall be prominently marked, both on the envelope and on the face of the request, with the legend “PRIVACY ACT INQUIRY.”
( 3 ) The request shall state that the individual is seeking information concerning records pertaining to himself and shall supply such additional identifying information, if any, as is called for in the system notice describing the system.
( 4 ) If an individual has reason to believe that information pertaining to him or her may be filed under a name other than the name he or she is currently using (e.g., a maiden name), he or she shall include this information in the request.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Charles A. French, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of River Holding Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c. Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |             |  |  |  |                                          
|----- |  | ----------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: |  | May 7, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Charles A. French                 
|      |  |             |  |  |  |                                          
|      |  |             |  |  |  | Charles A. French Chief Executive
Officer