alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1


# OAR Box 

# 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 67 ) ll-C-2 5 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200810:22:19AM

Sheet 67 of 147P. 2

" > a^ ^ ATT"^ - 1 ***f " 

### I J^ L 1 UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENCY^ * " IWgJj ? WASHINGTON , D.C. 2046 0 *^ > r*

1

" , OFFIC E O F NO VI 8 KW 3 \ '""W ^ ^~AIRtANO RADIATION Pet e Williams , Manage r o f Environmenta l Safet y Chevro nRichmon d Refiner y P.O . Bo x127 2 Richmond , C A9480 2 Dea r Mr . Williams , O nbehal f o f th e Environmenta l Protectio nAgency' s Ne wSourc e Revie w Workgrou p members , I amwritin g t o than k yo u fo r meetin g wit hu s o n Septembe r 27 , 1993 . W e greatl yappreciat e th e tim e yo u too k t o answe r ou r question s an d t o assis t u s i nunderstandin g som e o f th e aspect s o f you r ai r permi t an d facilit yoperations . A s w e explaine d t o you , ou r effort s ar e du e t o Ne wSourc e Revie wRefor m effort s o f th e Agency . A nNS RRefor mmeetin g wit hindustr yrepresentatives , States , environmenta l representatives , an d othe r federa l agencie s wa s schedule d fo r Novembe r 8 an d 9 . Th e meetin g wa s hel d an d th e material s hande d ou t fo r discussio nar e availabl e i nth e publi c docke t a s wil l b e document s prepare d comin g ou t o f th e meeting . W e will , however , b e sendin g yo u th e material s fo r thi s meetin g a s a courtes yi nappreciatio nfo r th e courtes yyo u extende d t o us . Th e nex t meetin g o f thi s group ma yb e schedule d fo r tw o day s i nth e wee k o f Januar y17 , 1994 . Material s fo r tha t meetin g wil l als o b e availabl e i nth e publi c docke t an d o nth e Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g an d Standards ' TechnologyTransfe r Networ k (OAQPS ' TTN) . I f yo u hav e an

yquestion s regardin g thes e meetings , th e materials , o r th e NS RRefor meffort s yo u maycal l m e a t (703 ) 308-870 9 o r Larr yElmor e a t (919 ) 541-5433 . Larr ywil l b e sendin g yo u th e copie s o f th e material s from th e Novembe r 8 and 9 meeting . Sincerely , Clar a Poffenberger , Stationar ySourc e Complianc e Divisio n Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g an d Standard s

cc : Larr yElmore , OAQP S Bil l Lamason , OAQP S Bil l Tyndall , OPAR Mar k Kataoka , OG C

__£7^ XRecycled/Recyclabl e " Printe d wit h Soy/Canol a In k o n pape rtha i contain s atleas t50 % recycled fibe r 

# <SB
### **[CHAPTER 149—TRANSFERRED]**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Former chapter 149 of this title was renumbered chapter 205 and transferred to part V of subtitle A. See 2021 Amendment notes preceding section 3101 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 149, comprised of sections 2511 to 2518, relating to manufacturing technology, was repealed, except for sections 2517 and 2518, by Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4202(a), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2659. Sections 2517 and 2518 of that chapter were renumbered sections 2523 and 2522, respectively, of this chapter by Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §§4232(a), 4233(a), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2687, and were subsequently repealed.

Another prior chapter 149, comprised of section 2511, was successively renumbered chapter 150 of this title, comprised of section 2521, then chapter 152 of this title, comprised of section 2540 et seq.

A prior chapter 150, comprised of sections 2521 to 2526, relating to development of dual-use critical technologies, was repealed, except for sections 2524 to 2526, by Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4202(a), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2659. Sections 2524, 2525, and 2526 of that chapter were renumbered sections 2513, 2517, and 2518, respectively, of chapter 148 of this title by Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §§4223(a), 4227(a), 4228, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2681, 2685. Sections 2513 and 2517 of that chapter were subsequently repealed. Section 2518 of that chapter was subsequently renumbered section 4834 of chapter 383 of this title by Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1868(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4282.

Another prior chapter 150, comprised of section 2521, was renumbered chapter 152 of this title, comprised of section 2540 et seq.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2736

DERNECK L. PITTMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DENNIS HARDEE; ROYCE DAVIS; ELKAY SOUTHERN,

INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District

Judge. (CA-97-19-F)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derneck L. Pittman, Appellant Pro Se. John S. Burgin, OGLETREE,

DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Raleigh, North Carolina; Tracey

Lynne Truesdale, MURPHY, SMITH & POLK, Chicago, Illinois, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pittman v.

Hardee, No. CA-97-19-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Broyles *v.*Pearson Piano Company.

[No. 12,398.

Filed December 10, 1925.]

From Marion Superior Court (A 26,137); *Clinton H. Givan,*Judge.

Action between Ida M. Broyles and the Pearson Piano Company. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*W. E. Henderson,*for appellant.

*Robert N. Fulton,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed.
# Instructions

mailto:InformationQuality@omb.eop.govmailto:mschwab@omb.eop.gov

# Section I

# Section II

# Section III

# Section IV

# Section V

# Section VI
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4463]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATES: The board meeting will be held on Thursday, March 10, 
2011, 11:30 a.m.-5 p.m., ET, and Friday, March 11, 2011, 9 a.m.-12:30 
p.m. ET, and from 3:30-5 p.m. ET, if necessary. Please refer to the NCD 
Web site (http://www.ncd.gov) for any late changes to the meeting 
times.

PLACE: The board meeting will occur in two different locations. On 
Thursday, March 10, 2011, the meeting will occur in the offices of 
Mayer Brown LLP, 1999 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. On Friday, 
March 11, 2011, the meeting will occur at the Access Board Conference 
Room, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20004.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The tentative agenda for the board meeting 
includes annual ethics training, a demonstration of the agency's Web 
site redesign, a possible speaker from the U.S. Department of Health 
and Human Services, the ``Living'' regional forum, a review of the 
agency's budget and strategic plan implementation, and other items, to 
be determined. A portion of the meeting from 3:30-5 p.m., on Friday, 
March 11, 2011 may be closed to discuss internal personnel rules and 
practices, pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of the Sunshine Act, and in 
accordance with a determination made by the NCD Chairman.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Anne Sommers, NCD, 1331 F Street, 
NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 (V), 202-272-2074 
(TTY).

ACCOMMODATIONS: Those who plan to attend and require accommodations 
should notify NCD as soon as possible to allow time to make 
arrangements.

    Dated: February 24, 2011.
Aaron Bishop,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-4463 Filed 2-24-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P
H. Res. 613

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 6, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 3244) to combat trafficking of persons, especially into the sex trade, slavery, and slavery-like conditions,

in the United States and countries around the world through

prevention, through prosecution and enforcement against

traffickers, and through protection and assistance to victims

of trafficking. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference

report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Tony Scullion, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 16, 2005/s/ Tony ScullionTony ScullionPresident and Chief Executive Officer
§ 559.1 What is the scope and purpose of this part? ( a ) The purpose of this part is to ensure that each place, facility, or location where class II or III gaming will occur is located on Indian lands eligible for gaming and obtains an attestation certifying that the construction and maintenance of the gaming facility, and the operation of that gaming, is conducted in a manner that adequately protects the environment and the public health and safety, pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
( b ) Each gaming place, facility, or location conducting class II or III gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act or on which a tribe intends to conduct class II or III gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act is subject to the requirements of this part.
[77 FR 58772, Sept. 24, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 31994, June 5, 2015]
#### Arthula Stonecipher *et al. v.*Samuel Hall.

*Witness—competency.*In a suit to enforce a vendor’s lien against the widow and heirs of .the deceased vendee, the complainant is a competent witness to disprove a conversation alleged to have been had between himself and another witness who testified on the hearing.

*122"Writ op Error to the Circuit Court of Marion county; the Hon. Silas L. Bryan, Judge, presiding-.

Mr. Henry C. Goodnow, and Mr. Dwyer Tracy, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. B. B. Smith, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Justice McAllister

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a bill in equity, by Hall, the defendant in error, to enforce a vendor’s lien .upon a tract of land described therein, which he had sold and conveyed to one Alexander B. Stonecipher, in his life time. The bill alleges the sale, purchase and conveyance of the land, the consideration to be paid in all, the amount which had been paid, and that which was still due and unpaid; alleges the death of the vendee, who are his widow and heirs at law, making the widow, infant heirs and administrator of his estate parties defendant, praying that a vendor’s lien might be declared in complainant’s favor. The infants were duly summoned, a guardian *ad litem*was appointed for them, who filed the usual answer. The adult defendants appeared and filed answers. To the answers replication was filed. The court, on the hearing of the case upon pleadings and proofs, decreed in favor of Hall, and the defendant brings the case to this court by-writ of error. • The errors assigned are frivolous.

The proof shows a case for a vendor’s lien beyond all reasonable doubt. The only defense attempted to be set up was that Hall specifically agreed to take the individual responsibility of Joshua Stonecipher and Alexander. Joshua was Alexander’s father, and he agreed to pay one-half of th& purchase money as an advancement to ids son. This half he paid. The land was conveyed to Alexander, and, for the other half of the purchase money, Alexander gave his own *123notes, with interest, which had not been- paid. Joshua was offered as a witness to sustain this defense. Then Hall was offered, in his own behalf, for the sole purpose of contradicting Joshua’s evidence as to a conversation between himself and Hall. For this purpose Hall was a competent witness.

Finding no error in the record, the decree of the court below must be affirmed.

*Decree affirmed.*
Directory of Trails        - Directory of Trails
        - 1. Tidelands Trail - Fremont
        - 2. LaRiviere Marsh Trail -Fremont
        - 3. Shoreline Trail & 4. No Name Trail - Fremont
        - 5. Newark Slough Trail - Fremont
        - 6. Warm Springs Trail - Fremont
        - 7. Coyote Creek Lagoon Trail - Fremont
        - 8. Alviso Slough Trail - Alviso
        - 9. Mallard Slough Trail - Alviso
        - 10. New Chicago Marsh Trail - Alviso
        - 11. Moffett Bay Trail - Sunnyvale
        - 12. Stevens Creek East Trail - Mountain View
        - 13. Faber-Laumeister Trail - East Palo Alto
        - 14. Ravenswood Trail - Menlo Park
        - 15. SF2 Trail - Menlo Park
        - 16. Bair Island Trail - Redwood City

## 2. LaRiviere Marsh Trail -Fremont

**Length**0.7 miles one way

**Amenities and Uses**Parking, restrooms and drinking water near visitor center, hiking. No pets. No bicycles.

**Trail Surface**Compacted, mostly flat dirt levee with wooden boardwalk.

**Highlights**Wildlife and historic salt pond structures viewing. Trail leads through tidal salt marsh, restored from a commercial salt crystallizer bed. This trail is probably the best place on the refuge to view the endangered Ridgway’s rail as it comes out at low tide to feed in the muddy slough channels.

**Connections to Other Trails**Easily connects to Harrier Spur Trail to Tidelands Trail and Newark Slough Trail. Connects to Marshlands Rd., the paved portion of the Bay Trail that goes over the Dumbarton Bridge. Easily connects to the Quarry Trail which leads to the Apay Trail in Coyote Hills Regional Park.

**Directions to Trailhead**From HWY 84 on the east side of the Dumbarton Bridge in Fremont, take the Thornton Ave. exit. Drive 0.6 miles south on Thornton Ave. and turn right onto Marshlands Rd. Turn right at the first parking lot.

**Click on map to enlarge**
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Barry W. Tackett
Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer

Date: August 16, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 75.10 Where application forms may be obtained.

Application forms will be supplied by the Tribal Enrollment Office of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, Council House, Cherokee, N.C. 28719, upon request, either in person or by mail.

[38 FR 9998, Apr. 23, 1973. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
#### Harriet De Forest, Respondent, *v.*The City of Utica, Appellant.

(Submitted April 4, 1877;

decided April 17, 1877.)

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries from a fall alleged to have been caused through defendant’s neglect to keep one of its sidewalks in repair.

*615The accident occurred Saturday evening, June 5th, 1875. The court admitted evidence showing the condition of the walk on the next Monday. *Held,*no error.

After the witness had testified to the bad condition of the sidewalk in the summer of 1874, a year before the accident, he was permitted to testify that in May before new pieces of plank were put in, and that the walk was in better condition than it was the year before. *Held*competent, and that it clearly could not have harmed defendant.

The plaintiff testified that at the time of the accident she was pregnant, and that when she fell she felt as if her “ inwards turned upside down.” A physician testified that the accident might have caused mal-position of the child in the womb, At her confinement, mal-position was found to exist. This question was then asked the physician: “ Did the mal-position of the child cause the mother any more pain at childbirth than if the child was in a natural position?” This was objected to, and answer received under objection. The witness answered: “ Yes, and that it was necessary to use instruments for the delivery.” *Held,*that the evidence was competent; that it was for the jury to determine whether the mal-position was the result of the accident; and, if it Avas, to take it into consideration in estimating the damages, as they would any other pain and suffering to which plaintiff was subjected by the accident.

*O. Arthur White,*for appellant.

*S. M. Lindsley,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam*

opinion for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2006294EN.01004801.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/48

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006 — Bavendam and Others v Commission

(Case T-80/05) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Decisions 2004/798/EC and 2004/813/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Continental biogeographical region and the Atlantic biogeographical region - Persons directly and individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/101)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Hinrich Bavendam (Bremen, Germany); Günther Früchtnicht (Bremen); Hinrich Geerken (Bremen); Hans-Jürgen Weyhausen-Brinkmann (Bremen); Curt-Hildebrand von Einsiedel (Leipzig, Germany); Christina Gräfin von Schall-Riaucour (Ahlen-Vorhelm, Germany); Franz-Albert Metternich-Sandor, Prinz von Ratibor und Corvey (Höxter, Germany); Christoph Prinz zu Schleswig-Holstein (Thumby, Germany); and Stadt Schloß Holte-Stukenbrock (Germany) (represented by: T. Giesen, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beek and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/798/EC of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Continental biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 382, p. 1), and Commission Decision 2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 387, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

1

---
#### § 700.103 Uniform Act.

The term Uniform Act means the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1894; 42 U.S.C. 4601 *et seq.*; Pub. L. 91-646).