alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 589 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 589

  Congratulating Nancy Johnson on winning the first gold medal of the 
                2000 Olympic games in Sydney, Australia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2000

Mrs. Biggert submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating Nancy Johnson on winning the first gold medal of the 
                2000 Olympic games in Sydney, Australia.

Whereas Nancy Johnson, a native of Downers Grove, Illinois, captured the first 
        gold medal of the 2000 summer Olympic games in Sydney, Australia, by 
        winning the women's 10 meter air rifle competition;
Whereas Nancy Johnson's victory was the culmination of years of hard work, 
        dedication, and participation in international competition, including 
        the 1996 Olympic games in Atlanta, the 1999 Pan American Games, and the 
        1998 World Championships;
Whereas Nancy Johnson's Olympic performance and shooting achievements have 
        raised the level of awareness and appreciation for women's sports 
        throughout the United States and the world;
Whereas Nancy Johnson's gold-medal-winning performance epitomizes the goals and 
        ideals of the Olympics, which include a commitment to excellence, grace 
        under pressure, and good will toward fellow competitors; and
Whereas Nancy Johnson has honored the Nation through her dedication to 
        excellence and high achievement: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Nancy Johnson on capturing the first gold 
        medal of the 2000 summer Olympic games in Sydney, Australia, by 
        winning the women's 10 meter air rifle competition; and
            (2) recognizes the important contribution Nancy Johnson's 
        achievement has made to the United States Olympic effort and to 
        the advancement of women's sports.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006326EN.01005306.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/53

---

Order of the President of the Court of 4 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-298/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 326/114)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 237, 30.09.2006.

1

---
Summary of Meeting Between the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and EPA Staff

September 15, 2011

List of Attendees

Erika Farris, EPA

Jeremy Bauer, EPA

Greg Schaner, EPA

Ty Asfaw, NAHB

Jeff Augello, NAHB

Michael Mittelholzer, NAHB

Susan Asmus, NAHB

Connie Bosma, EPA

Jesse Pritts, EPA

Pete Ford, EPA

Summary of Meeting

During the meeting, the following issues were discussed:

EPA provided an update on the status of the new permit;

NAHB shared concerns about the implementation of the non-numeric ELGs in the permit;

NAHB provided recommendations for simplifying the CGP, including:

o Adoption of a single lot permit;

o Development of a “no-discharge” certification; and

o Expansion of the use of a qualifying local program.

NAHB shared concerns about the proposed water-quality based effluent limits.
IV

House Calendar No. 276

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 574

[Report No. 106–844]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 1654) to authorize appropriations for the National Aeronautics

and Space Administration for fiscal years 2000, 2001, and 2002, and

for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 12, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 1654) to authorize appropriations for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for fiscal years 2000, 2001, and 2002, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 1654) to authorize appropriations

4 for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

5 for fiscal years 2000, 2001, and 2002, and for other pur-
2

HRES 574 RH

1 poses. All points of order against the conference report

2 and against its consideration are waived. The conference

3 report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 276

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 574

[Report No. 106–844]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1654) to authorize appropriations for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for fiscal years

2000, 2001, and 2002, and for other purposes.

SEPTEMBER 12, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### §9191. Non-regular officers: status

A commissioned officer of the Air Force, other than of the Regular Air Force, who is on active duty in any commissioned grade has the rights and privileges, and is entitled to the benefits, provided by law for a commissioned officer of the Air Force Reserve—

(1) whose reserve grade is that in which the officer not of the Regular Air Force is serving;

(2) who has the same length of service as the officer not of the Regular Air Force; and

(3) who is on active duty in his reserve grade.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 524, §8491; renumbered §9191, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8491 | 10:506d(h). | Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 512, §515(h), 61 Stat. 908. |

The first 12 words are substituted for 10:506d(h) (1st 11 words). The words "has the rights and privileges, and is entitled to the benefits" are substituted for the words "shall be entitled * * * to the same rights, privileges, and benefits". Clause (1) is substituted for the words "in a grade the same as such 'active-duty grade' ". The words "as the officer not of the Regular Air Force" are substituted for the words "holding appointment in the Army Reserve". The words "his reserve grade" are substituted for the words "the grade held in the Army".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8491 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# U.S. Supports Counter Narcotics Training for the Lao Counter Narcotic Police 

By   Staff ReportEmbassy of the U.S., Laos

The U.S. Embassy supported a three-day intensive counter narcotics trainingfor the Lao Counter Narcotic Police Departments from four southern provinces. The training began on Wednesday September 16, 2015, at the Provincial ConferenceHall in Attapu province.

The instructors from the Lao Counter Narcotics Police Department conductedthe training, which included a general overview of the narcotic trends in theregion and worldwide.  They also discussed surveillance, conducting arrests,investigation-interrogation, evidence handling methodology, research andanalysis, drug prevention campaigns and current drug legislation.  Theparticipants and instructors shared their experiences from the field. 

Speaking to the 76 participants at the opening ceremony, the Chairman of LaoNational Commission for Drug Control and Supervision, Mr. Kou Chansina notedthat the role of today’s Counter Narcotics Police is more important than ever toprevent drug addiction and drug related crimes.

Police Department Director General, Lt. Col. Onphiew Khongviengthong thankedthe US Embassy for assisting Lao counter-narcotics police in their efforts tocombat illicit drugs and their harmful effects on the nation. As the Lao PDRprepares to enter the Asia Economic Community this year, this training helps theLao counter-narcotics police to cope with the challenges increased trade willpose to security services.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

426 

CA 10-02008 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

JAMES MAGUIRE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

CHELUS, HERDZIK, SPEYER & MONTE, P.C., BUFFALO (ARTHUR A. HERDZIK OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

BOUVIER PARTNERSHIP, LLP, BUFFALO (NORMAN E.S. GREENE OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Erie County

(Timothy J. Drury, J.), entered August 4, 2010. The amended order,

insofar as appealed from, granted the cross motion of plaintiff for

leave to serve an amended complaint asserting a cause of action

pursuant to 42 USC § 1983 and adding John/Jane Doe as a defendant. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the amended order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Entered: April 1, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
### Geology of the Betterton quadrangle, Kent County, Maryland, and a discussion of the regional stratigraphy

By: James Pierson Minard

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp816

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 580.2 When may the Commission waive its procedural rules governing appellate proceedings before the Commission?

The procedural provisions of parts 580 through 585 of this subchapter may be waived, in whole or in part, to promote the orderly conduct of business on motion to the Commission or on its own motion, if the ends of justice so require and if to do so does not substantially prejudice any party, except that the Commission may not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHI NGTON, D.C. 20460 

JUL 0 2 2015 

OFF ICE OF 

AI R AND RADIATION 

MEMORADUM 

From: Rebecca von dem Hagen, EPA/Stratospheric Protection Division ;\J~ ~~j~S 

To: EPA Air Docket EPA-HQ- OAR- 2014- 0198 

Subject: Docket Placeholder for EPA Responses to Comments on the SNAP Status 

Change Rule Claimed as Confidential Business Information 

This memorandum serves as a placeholder for EPA's confidential responses to comments and 

meeting materials that have been claimed as confidential business information (CBI) provided 

by: 

• 3M Industrial Adhesives and Tapes Division 

• Unified Brands 

• True Manufacturing Company 

• Whirlpool Corporation 

• NCFI Polyurethanes 

• Pactiv Building Products Division 

• DiversiFoam Products 

• Dow Chemical Company 

• Owens Corning 

• GE Appliances and Lighting 

• Ford Motor Company 

EPA has considered these comments and information in developing the final rule. Publicly 

available comments are summarized and responded to in the preamble to the final rule and the 

Response to Comments document. EPA's responses to information claimed as CBI will not be 

made available to the public, online or from the U.S. EPA Docket Center. 

Internet Address (URL ) • http //www epa gov 

Recycled/Recyc lable • Pnnted w1th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper
H. Res. 557

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 19, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1102) to provide for

pension reform, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. In lieu of the amendment

recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of

a substitute consisting of the text of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in H.R. 4843 shall be considered as adopted. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on

the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Ways and Means; (2) the amendment printed in the report

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if

offered by Representative Rangel or his designee, which shall
2

•HRES 557 EH

be in order without intervention of any point of order, shall

be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for

one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and

an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without

instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Todd Delmay, Chief Executive Officer of
The Luxurious Travel Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:



| | (a) | the Company’s periodic report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2015 (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



* * *



|By: | /s/ Todd Delmay         | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|    | Todd Delmay             | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer | 



Date: April 13, 2016
### §8072. Bureaus: distribution of business; orders; records; expenses

(a) Except as otherwise provided by law, the business of the executive part of the Department of the Navy shall be distributed among the bureaus as the Secretary of the Navy considers expedient and proper.

(b) Each bureau shall perform its duties under the authority of the Secretary, and its orders are considered as coming from the Secretary.

(c) Under the Secretary, each bureau has custody and charge of its records and accounts.

(d) Each bureau shall furnish to the Secretary estimates for its specific, general, and contingent expenses.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 285, §5132; renumbered §8072, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(a)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5132(a) | 5 U.S.C. 429 (as applicable to distribution of business among bureaus). | R.S. 419 (as applicable to distribution of business among bureaus). |
| | 5 U.S.C. 455 (1st 23 words). | July 12, 1921, ch. 44, §8 (1st par., 1st 37 words), 42 Stat. 140. |
| 5132(b) | 5 U.S.C. 430 (last 39 words). | R.S. 420 (last 39 words). |
| | 5 U.S.C. 430b. | June 20, 1940, ch. 400, §1(b) (2d sentence), 54 Stat. 493. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 455 (less 1st 23 words). | July 12, 1921, ch. 44, §8 (1st par., less 1st 37 words), 42 Stat. 140. |
| 5132(c) | 5 U.S.C. 430 (less last 39 words). | R.S. 420 (less last 39 words). |
| 5132(d) | 5 U.S.C. 431. | R.S. 430. |

In subsection (a) the phrase "Except as otherwise provided by law" is added to preserve provisions directing that the Chief of Naval Operations and other statutory offices and boards share in the business of the executive part of the Department of the Navy. The words "The Bureau of Aeronautics shall be charged with matters pertaining to naval aeronautics" in 5 U.S.C. 455 are omitted as implied in the name of the bureau and covered by the authority granted to the Secretary to distribute the business of the Department.

In subsection (b) the words "and shall have full force and effect as such" are omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (c) the words "Under the Secretary" are inserted to make the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 413 and 5 U.S.C. 430, the latter of which is here codified, harmonious and to give meaning to each provision.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8072 was renumbered section 9037 of this title.

A prior section 8074 was renumbered section 9074 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5132 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
u.s. De portm ent of T ransportation Federal Aviation Administration



### JUN· 

### 2 6 2015
Ti m T rott 3628 Seminole Lane Marianna. FL 32448 De ar Mr. Trott: 800 I ndependence Ave

.. S

. W

. Washington , DC 20591

Thi s i s in response to you r letter, posted to th e public docket (No. FAA-20 15-0263) petitio nin g th e Federa l Av iati o n Ad mini s tration (FAA) to initiate rul emaking to amend part 6 1 ofT itl e 14 Code of F ede ra l R eg ulati o n s ( 14 CF R )
. In yo ur pe tit ion. you reque s t that the FAA amend 14 CF R § 61
. 1 1 3 to permit co mmercial operation s of unmann ed ai rcra ft sys t ems (UAS) by licen sed or cer tifi cated pilots. I n accordance w ith 14 CF R § 11.73. th e F AA mu s t u se the followin g criteria when making a deci s ion as to whe th er or n ot to am e nd cu rrent r egu lat io n s based on a petit io n for r ulemakin g: I ) T he immedia cy of th e sa fet y o r secu rit y concerns you rai se; 2) The priorit y of ot her i ssues the FAA must deal w ith ; and 3) Th e r eso ur ces we have avai lab le to add r ess these i ssues. Each year, th e FAA prioritizes it s rulemakin g pro ject s ba sed on i ss ue s that are crucial to the safety of th e aviat io n com munit y and th e tra ve lin g pub li c t o e n s ure th e F AA de li ve rs th e most val ue to the aviat io n system. After r ev iew in g your request based on the cu rren t priorities for th e FAA and th e gu id e lin es found in 

### § I I
.73 , we determin e d th e issue you rais ed does not me e t th e criteria t o pursue rul emaking at thi s tim e . How eve r, your commen t s and arguments for the propos ed rul e change in yo ur petition wi ll be p laced in a database. wh ic h we w ill exa min e when we conside r future rul e maki n g. If the FAA does pursue ru le making in thi s area in the future. yo u wo uld be able to find ou t and track it thro ug h o ne o fth e two f o ll owi n g websites:• For significant rulemakings , you can find the status on the Department of Transportation ' s (DOT) website (http :// www.dol.!!Ov/ r e!!ula t io n s/ report
- o nsiuni fi can t-rul e makin!2 s ).
• For non-significant rulemakings , you can find the status on the DOT's semi

annua l regulatory agenda. through the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Office of Information and Reg ulatory Affair's (O IRA) Unified Agenda webs ite (http: // , vw \ v .r e!! into.!.!O v / pub li c /do/ eAge nd aMa in). 2

For the reasons above , we are dismissing yo ur petition for rulemaking in accordance with 14CFR§ 11.7 3. Sincerely ,

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

### '-
#### Benjamin Hopkins, Respondent, v. The Pilgrim Steam Laundry Company, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. 'Ho opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.