alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 12, 2005/s/ James R. SulatJames R. SulatPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### STATE v. THOMAS

No. 3P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 515

Petition by defendant for temporary stay allowed 12 January 1990.
#### § 502.5 Collateral agreement.

*Collateral agreement* means any contract, whether or not in writing, that is related, either directly or indirectly, to a management contract, or to any rights, duties or obligations created between a tribe (or any of its members, entities, or organizations) and a management contractor or subcontractor (or any person or entity related to a management contractor or subcontractor).
§ 700.247 Appeals. ( a ) *Right of appeal.* Where a request for records has been denied, in whole or part, the person submitting the request may appeal the denial to the Commission.
( b ) *Time for appeal.* An appeal must be received no later than twenty (20) days (Saturdays, Sundays, and public legal holidays excepted) after the date of the initial denial, in the case of a denial of an entire request, or twenty (20) days (Saturdays, Sundays, and public legal holidays excepted) after records have been made available, in the case of a partial denial.
( c ) *Form of appeal.* ( 1 ) An appeal shall be initiated by filing a written notice of appeal. The notice shall be accompanied by copies of the original request and the initial denial and should, in order to expedite the appellate process and give the requester an opportunity to present his arguments, contain a brief statement of the reasons why the requester believes the initial denial to have been in error.
( 2 ) The appeal shall be addressed to Freedom of Information Act Officer, Navajo-Hopi Indian Relocation Commission, P.O. Box KK, Flagstaff, Arizona 86002.
( 3 ) ( i ) Both the envelope containing the notice of appeal and the face of the notice shall bear the legend “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION APPEAL”. The failure of an appeal to bear such a legend will not disqualify an appeal from processing under § 2.18 if the appeal otherwise meets the requirements of this section. An appeal not bearing the legend “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION APPEAL” will not, however, be deemed to have been received for purposes of the running of the time limit set out in § 700.249 until it has been identified by Commission personnel as a Freedom of Information appeal and marked by them with this legend.
( ii ) Commission personnel identifying a communication from the public not bearing the legend “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION APPEAL” as an appeal otherwise meeting the requirements of this section shall immediately ( A ) mark the communication with the legend “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION APPEAL,”
( B ) date the appeal to reflect the date on which it was identified, and
( C ) take steps to assure proper processing of the appeal under the procedures in this subpart.
( 4 ) The Freedom of Information Act Officer shall be responsible for promptly furnishing copies of such notices to the Executive Director and the Commission's legal counsel.
# C_2006254EN.01001401.xml

| 20.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/14

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4127 — Edison/EDF Energia Italia)

(2006/C 254/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 August 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4127. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4127. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
### **CHAPTER 14—FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS**

Sec.
1751.
Short title.
1751a.
Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

1752.
Definitions.
1752a.
National Credit Union Administration.
1753.
Federal credit union organization.
1754.
Approval of organization certificate.
1755.
Fees.
1756.
Reports and examinations.
1756a.
Omitted.
1757.
Powers.
1757a.
Limitation on member business loans.
1758.
Bylaws.
1759.
Membership.
1760.
Members' meetings.
1761.
Management.
1761a.
Officers of the board.
1761b.
Board of directors; meetings; powers and duties; executive committee; membership officers; membership application.
1761c.
Credit committee.
1761d.
Supervisory committee; powers and duties; suspension of members; passbook.
1762.
Repealed.
1763.
Dividends.
1764.
Expulsion and withdrawal.
1765.
Minors.
1766.
Powers of Board.
1767.
Fiscal agents and depositories; authorization to secure deposits by governmental bodies.
1768.
Taxation.
1769.
Separability; right to alter, amend, or repeal chapter.
1770.
Allotment of space in Federal buildings or Federal land.
1771.
Conversion from Federal to State credit union and from State to Federal credit union.
1772.
Territorial application of chapter.
1772a.
Gifts; acceptance of conditional gifts; deposit.
1772b.
Apportionment.
1772c.
Trust fund.
1772c–1.
Community development revolving loan fund for credit unions.
1772d.
Forfeiture of organization certificate for money laundering or cash transaction reporting offenses.
1772e.
Data standards.
1772f.
Open data publication.
1773.
District of Columbia credit unions; conversion to Federal status.
1774.
Approval of certificate; assets and obligations of applicant credit union.
1775.
Conditions upon conversion to Federal status.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—SHARE INSURANCE

1781.
Insurance of member accounts.
1782.
Administration of insurance fund.
1783.
National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund.
1784.
Examination of insured credit unions.
1785.
Requirements governing insured credit unions.
1786.
Termination of insured credit union status; cease and desist orders; removal or suspension from office; procedure.
1786a.
Omitted.
1787.
Payment of insurance.
1788.
Special assistance to avoid liquidation.
1789.
Administrative provisions.
1789a.
Credit unions as depositaries of public money; fiscal agents; duties.
1790.
Nondiscriminatory provision.
1790a.
Board disapproval of directors, committee members, and senior executive officers of insured credit unions.
1790b.
Credit union employee protection remedy.
1790c.
Reward for information leading to recoveries or civil penalties.
1790d.
Prompt corrective action.
1790e.
Temporary Corporate Credit Union Stabilization Fund.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—CENTRAL LIQUIDITY FACILITY

1795.
Congressional findings.
1795a.
Definitions.
1795b.
National Credit Union Administration Central Liquidity Facility; establishment; management; jurisdiction.
1795c.
Membership.
1795d.
Capital stock.
1795e.
Extensions of credit.
1795f.
Powers of Board.
1795g.
Depositories, custodians, and fiscal agents.
1795h.
Audit of financial transactions.
1795i.
Annual report.
1795j.
Agent of Federal Reserve System.
1795k.
State and local tax exemption.
#### BREININGER v. MACKO

No. 174P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 665

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.
# C_2006305EN.01001701.xml

| 14.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4455 — Schmolz + Bickenbach/Swiss Steel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 305/07)

On 29 November 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4455. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4455. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
# C_2006310EN.01000901.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/9

---

Action brought on 24 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-440/06)

(2006/C 310/16)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and M. Konstantinidis)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 91/271/EEC (1) concerning urban waste-water treatment by failing to ensure that 24 agglomerations are provided with collecting systems for urban waste water meeting the requirements of Article 3 and/or urban waste water treatment systems satisfying the requirements of Article 4; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 91/271/EEC (1) concerning urban waste-water treatment by failing to ensure that 24 agglomerations are provided with collecting systems for urban waste water meeting the requirements of Article 3 and/or urban waste water treatment systems satisfying the requirements of Article 4;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 3 of Directive 91/271/EEC requires Member States to ensure that all agglomerations of a certain size are provided with collecting systems for urban waste water. Article 4 of the Directive also provides that Member States are to ensure that urban waste water entering collecting systems is subject to secondary treatment (or an equivalent treatment) within the meaning of Article 2(8) of the Directive.

This case concerns the breach of two specific obligations on the part of the Hellenic Republic, provided for in Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 91/271/EEC: first, the requirement that there should be a collecting system for urban waste water by 31 December 2000 in all agglomerations with a population of more than 15 000 before 31 December 2000 in accordance with Article 3 of the Directive; second, the requirement that all urban waste water discharged into collecting systems should be subject to secondary treatment by 31 December 2000 in agglomerations with a population of more than 15 000.

By the end of the period laid down by the Commission in the statement of reasons in its opinion (13 September 2005), 24 agglomerations in Greece did not have a collecting system for urban waste water and/or a treatment system for urban waste water as required by the Directive.

---

(1)  OJ L 135 of 30.05.1991, p. 40.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.116 What is the time period in which the Secretary must investigate a Tribe's compliance with a TERA? ( a ) If the Secretary determines under § 224.115 that one of the threshold determinations in § 224.114 has been met, then within 120 days of the Secretary's receipt of a petition, the Secretary must determine: ( 1 ) Whether the petitioner is an interested party; and
( 2 ) If the petitioner is an interested party, whether or not a Tribe is in compliance with the TERA as alleged in the petition;
( b ) The Secretary may extend the time for the Tribe making the determinations in paragraph (a) of this section for up to 120 days in any case in which the Secretary determines that additional time is necessary to evaluate the claims in the petition and the Tribe's written response, if any. If the Secretary decides to extend the time, the Secretary must notify the petitioner and the Tribe in writing of the extension.
[84 FR 69613, Dec. 18, 2019]
Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2014 to December
31, 2014







COMM 2012-LC4







In accordance
with Item 1123 of Regulation AB andwith the requirements detailed in §10.11 of thePooling and Servicing Agreement
(the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool,(the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing
this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:



| | (A) | a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the
“Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision
and;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
us.





























7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda,
MD 20814
www.cwcapital.com
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-32 

March 5, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4042 Termination by PBGC 

OPINION: 

 Your letter of January 26, 1976 to the Association of Private Pension and Welfare Plans, Inc. was referred to the

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the PBGC) for whatever advice it could offer. 

As you may be aware, the PBGC administers the Plan Termination Insurance Program under Title IV of the

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act). When it is decided to terminate a plan covered by Title

IV the plan administrator must notify the PBGC. However, the decision to terminate is that of the plan representatives.

The PBGC may institute action to terminate a plan only under certain specific circumstances [See Act, Section 4042],

none of which appears to be present, based on your letter. Accordingly, we are unable to offer you assistance in making

the decision to terminate or continue the plan. We appreciate the complex factors involved in making the decision

confronting you. 

Please contact * * * of my staff at * * * if you wish to further discuss this matter. 

George B. Driesen 

Deputy General Counsel
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**





I,
      Paul
      E. Martin, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of Renaissance Media Group LLC,
      Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and
      Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (the "Company") in compliance with 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission:




·
            fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and


·
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Paul E. Martin


Paul
      E.
      Martin


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


August
      5,
      2005
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-31 

November 27, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041(a) Termination by Plan Administrator. Filing of Notice of Intent to Terminate 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your question: Does the termination of an individual account plan require notification to the

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation pursuant to the terms of Section 4041 of the Act? 

The termination of a plan excluded from coverage by Section 4021(b) of the Act does not require notice to the

PBGC pursuant to Section 4041 of the Act. The latter section requires notice of a proposed termination only from coverd

plans. 

Henry Rose 

Acting General Counsel
§ 26.34 What type of job training assistance may be approved? The following types of training that lead to gainful employment may be approved: ( a ) Nationally accredited vocational training;
( b ) Training and non-accredited vocational courses provided by a tribe;
( c ) Training programs not operated by the tribe but approved by the service provider;
( d ) Apprenticeship training supervised by a State apprenticeship agency or council or by the Federal Apprenticeship Training Service that is provided by a corporation or association that has been training bona fide apprentices for at least one year or any other apprenticeship program approved by the service provider; or
( e ) OJT offered by a public or private business.
### §325. Effect of vacancy

A vacancy in the office of trustee during a case does not abate any pending action or proceeding, and the successor trustee shall be substituted as a party in such action or proceeding.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2562.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

Section 325, derived from Bankruptcy Act section 46 [section 74 of former title 11] and Bankruptcy Rule 221(b), specifies that a vacancy in the office of trustee during a case does not abate any pending action or proceeding. The successor trustee, when selected and qualified, is substituted as a party in any pending action or proceeding.
### [§1255. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–130, §1(6), Nov. 8, 1967, 81 Stat. 374]

Section, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 100; Nov. 2, 1966, Pub. L. 89–718, §3, 80 Stat. 1115, covered the retirement of female permanent regular warrant officers with 20 years of active service upon attaining age 55.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Multiemployer Plans 
-  Multiemployer 5-Year Report 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Multiemployer 5-Year Report

Read about PBGC's multiemployer likely revenue needs for the next 10 and 20 years in our Multiemployer Five-Year Report (also known as the Quinquennial Report). 

These reports discuss the amount of premium revenue needed in order for PBGC’s Multiemployer Program to provide financial assistance to insolvent multiemployer plans to enable them to pay benefits at PBGC's guarantee level.

As shown in this report, PBGC’s Multiemployer Program will not likely run out of money within the next 20 years due to the enactment of The American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP). The FY 2020 report reflects the significant monetary relief provided under ARP, and shows a median projected insolvency in 2055 and a 44 percent probability of solvency through 2060 under current law. Additional revenue increases the probability of the Multiemployer Program remaining solvent.

The Pension Insurance Modeling System (PIMS) is the modeling system used to perform the Five-Year analysis, which also uses data and assumptions that are consistent with the FY 2020 Projections Report.

 

September 20, 2021

##           Reports      

Annual Performance & Financial Reports

Budget, Performance & Planning

ERISA 4010 Reports

FOIA Annual & Quarterly Reports

Multiemployer 5-Year Reports

Pension Insurance Modeling System (PIMS) Reports

Projections Reports

Reports Archives