alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Inland Steel Company *v.*Nan et al.

[No. 12,276.

Filed November 25, 1925.]

Master and *Servant.—Evidence held insufficient to show widow’s dependency on deceased husband within the provisions of Workmen’s Compensation*Act.—Evidence held insufficient to show that claimant was dependent on her husband at the time of his death from an injury received while employed by the defendant so as to come within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

*674From Industrial Board of Indiana.

Application under the Workmen’s Compensation Act-by Paulina Nan and Ann Nan against the Inland Steel Company for compensation for the death of Jacob Nan. From an award in favor of Pauline Nan, wife of the deceased employee, the defendant appeals. *Reversed.*By the court in banc.

*William J. McAleer, Francis J. Dorsey, Gerald A. Gillett*and *Perry R. Chapin,*for appellant.

Nichols, P. J.

Appellees, by John Pora, trustee, brought this action before the Industrial Board as dependents, praying an award of compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law alleging that on July 24, 1923, Jacob Nan, husband of Paulina Nan and father of Ann Nan, died as the proximate result of personal injuries received by him by reason of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment by appellant. The Industrial Board made its award, in which it awarded to appellee Paulina compensation at the rate of $13.20 per week, beginning on July 24, 1923, during the period of her dependency, not to exceed 300 weeks, further ordering that appellee Ann take nothing. From this award, appellant prayed an appeal, to this court.

At the trial and in oral argument, it was stipulated by the parties that the only question to be determined was as to the dependency of appellee Paulina Nan. The undisputed evidence shows that said appellee left for Europe in April, 1923, and at the time of the death of her husband, she was living separate and apart from him. In her application for compensation, she gives her residence as Roumania. Whether she intended to return to her husband or whether the separation was final does not appear. It does not appear by competent evidence that appellee had not remarried. The only evidence that she was in any way dependent upon her hus*675band for support was by said John Pora to the effect that he had forwarded money from the husband to appellee. When or how much does not appear. Such evidence is wholly insufficient for the purpose for which offered.

The award is reversed, with instruction to the Industrial Board to hear further evidence as to the dependency of appellee upon her husband for support, and to make award accordingly.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-36,732-02

EX PARTE GEORGE OLIVER MCKNIGHT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1149919-A IN THE 177 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of

robberyand sentenced to thirty-two years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed

his conviction. McKnight v. State, No. 14-08-00770-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14 Dist.] Dec. 17, th

2009) (not designated for publication). 

Applicant’s 11.07 application raises nine grounds for relief and his memorandum of law

exceeds fifty pages. The habeas court found that the memorandum’s length renders the writ
application non-compliant and recommended dismissing. TEX. R. APP. P. 73.1(d). However, the

habeas record contains “Applicant’s Pro Se Motion For Suspension Of Rules,” in which he requests

leave to exceed the page limitation. TEX. R. APP. P. 73.1(d). It is not clear if the habeas court

considered Applicant’s motion and its recommendation to dismiss implicitly rejects Applicant’s

request, or whether the court was unaware of the motion. We remand this application to the 177th

District Court of Harris County to allow the trial judge to clarify the record by either making an

explicit ruling on the motion, or to find that its recommendation should be construed as a denial of

the motion. 

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved this issue, which 

shall be resolved within 45 days of this order. A supplemental transcript shall be forwarded to this

Court within 60 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this

Court. 

Filed: June 10, 2015

Do not publish
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Carl E. Vogel, the Chief Executive Officer of Renaissance Media Group
LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and
Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (collectively, the Company) in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (the Report)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Carl E. VogelCarl E. VogelChief Executive OfficerMay 17, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 12, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00497

- CR

IN RE Juan Robert RODRIGUEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On August 8, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, contending the trial

court has not r uled on a motion dated March 27, 2016 which he filed in the trial

. This court is of

the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The responde nt and the real parties in interest

may file a response to the petition in this court no later than September 2 7 , 2016. Any such

response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on September 12, 2016

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________ ___

Keith E. Hottle

, Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1990CR1294 , styled The State of Texas v. Juan Roberto Rodriguez

, pending in the 227th Judicial District Court

, Bexar Co unty, Texas, the Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell presiding.
Exhibit 99.8
 
  March 12, 2014
  Consent of Independent Auditor
   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Crescent Point Energy Corp. of our report dated March 11, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, which appear in the Exhibit incorporated by reference in this Annual Report. We also consent to reference to us under the heading “Interests of Experts”, which appears in the Annual Information Form included in the Exhibit incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   
 Chartered Accountants
   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 111 5 Avenue SW, Suite 3100, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 5L3
 T: +1 403 509 7500, F: +1 403 781 1825, www.pwc.com/ca
 
 “PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a separate legal entity.
§ 286.22 Reports. ( a ) Grantees are required to furnish the Assistant Secretary comparative balance sheets and profit and loss statements semi-annually for the first two years of operation following receipt of the grant, and annually thereafter for the succeeding three years. These may be copied of financial statements required by and furnished to the lender which provided the loan portion of the total financing required. If the lender does not require financial statements, the grantee must prepare and furnish copies of comparative balance sheets and profit and loss statements to the Assistant Secretary.
( b ) The Assistant Secretary will establish accounting and reporting systems which will appropriately show the status of the Indian Business Development Program at all times.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of The RiceX Company. (the "Company"),
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



         /s/ TODD C. CROW
--------------------------------------
         Todd C. Crow
         Chief Financial Officer

May 17, 2004

































                                 Exhibit 32.2-1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Research Centers in Wound Healing.                     

*Date:*                         March 22, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12B, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call.)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brian R. Pike, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-3907.                         *pikbr@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 22, 2011.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4383 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Guidance Document Database 
-  Individual Account Plan 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Individual account plan

                  -  Opinion Letter 76-07
Title IV does not cover Individual account plans or welfare plans.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 89-06
Individual account plan exemption from coverage.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 74-20
Individual account plan is exempt from coverage under Title IV.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 75-89
Conversion from a covered plan to an individual account plan is a termination.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 75-05
Individual account plan is exempt from coverage under Title IV.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 74-17
Professional service employer plans and individual account plans are excluded from coverage.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 75-110
Individual account plan is exempt from coverage.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 76-91
A plan amendment that preserves a defined benefit does not  allow a plan to fit under the individual account exemption from coverage.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 75-108
Individual account plan is exempt from coverage.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 76-58
Plan is an Individual account plan and is not a covered plan under Title IV.  
-               document            
 

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-   Next  
-   Last
### **CHAPTER 7—LIQUIDATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—OFFICERS AND ADMINISTRATION

Sec.
701.
Interim trustee.
702.
Election of trustee.
703.
Successor trustee.
704.
Duties of trustee.
705.
Creditors' committee.
706.
Conversion.
707.
Dismissal of a case or conversion to a case under chapter 11 or 13.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—COLLECTION, LIQUIDATION, AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ESTATE

721.
Authorization to operate business.
722.
Redemption.
723.
Rights of partnership trustee against general partners.
724.
Treatment of certain liens.
725.
Disposition of certain property.
726.
Distribution of property of the estate.
727.
Discharge.
[728.
Repealed.]

#### SUBCHAPTER III—STOCKBROKER LIQUIDATION

741.
Definitions for this subchapter.
742.
Effect of section 362 of this title in this subchapter.
743.
Notice.
744.
Executory contracts.
745.
Treatment of accounts.
746.
Extent of customer claims.
747.
Subordination of certain customer claims.
748.
Reduction of securities to money.
749.
Voidable transfers.
750.
Distribution of securities.
751.
Customer name securities.
752.
Customer property.
753.
Stockbroker liquidation and forward contract merchants, commodity brokers, stockbrokers, financial institutions, financial participants, securities clearing agencies, swap participants, repo participants, and master netting agreement participants.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—COMMODITY BROKER LIQUIDATION

761.
Definitions for this subchapter.
762.
Notice to the Commission and right to be heard.
763.
Treatment of accounts.
764.
Voidable transfers.
765.
Customer instructions.
766.
Treatment of customer property.
767.
Commodity broker liquidation and forward contract merchants, commodity brokers, stockbrokers, financial institutions, financial participants, securities clearing agencies, swap participants, repo participants, and master netting agreement participants.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—CLEARING BANK LIQUIDATION

781.
Definitions.
782.
Selection of trustee.
783.
Additional powers of trustee.
784.
Right to be heard.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–8, title I, §102(k), title VII, §719(b)(2), title IX, §907(p)(2), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 35, 133, 182, added items 753 and 767, substituted "Dismissal of a case or conversion to a case under chapter 11 or 13" for "Dismissal" in item 707, and struck out item 728 "Special tax provisions".

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(5) [title I, §112(d)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–396, added subchapter V heading and items 781 to 784.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §471, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 380, substituted "Successor" for "Succesor" in item 703.
### §9321. Mandatory retirement: Superintendent of the United States Air Force Academy; waiver authority

(a) Mandatory Retirement.—Upon the termination of the detail of an officer to the position of Superintendent of the United States Air Force Academy, the Secretary of the Air Force shall retire the officer under any provision of this chapter under which the officer is eligible to retire.

(b) Waiver Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement in subsection (a) for good cause. In each case in which such a waiver is granted for an officer, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a written notification of the waiver, with a statement of the reasons supporting the decision that the officer not retire, and a written notification of the intent of the President to nominate the officer for reassignment. In the event a waiver under this subsection is granted, the subsequent nomination and appointment of such officer having served as Superintendent of the Academy to a further assignment in lieu of retirement shall be subject to the advice and consent of the Senate.

(Added Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §532(a)(3)(A), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 603, §8921; amended Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §541(a)(3), (c)(3)(A), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1902, 1904; renumbered §9321, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(13), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833; Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title V, §509(c), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2560.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–263 inserted at end "In the event a waiver under this subsection is granted, the subsequent nomination and appointment of such officer having served as Superintendent of the Academy to a further assignment in lieu of retirement shall be subject to the advice and consent of the Senate."

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8921 of this title as this section.

2004—Pub. L. 108–375 inserted "; waiver authority" after "Academy" in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Application of Section to Superintendents Serving on October 5, 1999

Section not applicable to an officer serving on Oct. 5, 1999, in the position of Superintendent of the United States Military Academy, Naval Academy, or Air Force Academy for so long as that officer continues on and after that date to serve in that position without a break in service, see section 532(a)(5) of Pub. L. 106–65, set out as a note under section 3921 of this title.
#### § 2.704 How long do I have to file an appeal of a Tribal representative recognition decision?

You have 10 days after you receive the Tribal representative recognition decision to file a Notice of Appeal.
#### A. D. Jones v. The State.

No. 22921.

Delivered October 25, 1944.

*Reversed and remanded.*

The opinion states the case.

*547
      *E. F. Fruechte,*of Wichita Falls, and *Rollie Francher,*of Seymour, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Baylor County of a violation of the liquor laws, and sentenced to pay a fine of $250.00, and an imprisonment in jail for a term of ninety days, hence this appeal.

It is necessary to .consider only one point raised in this appeal, which will dispose of the case.

Appellant’s home was searched by enforcement officers by virtue of a search warrant issued upon an affidavit, and in said affidavit and warrant the place desired to be searched was referred to only as the “premises of A. D. Jones.” Nowhere therein is it set forth in such affidavit and warrant that appellant occupied, possessed, was in control of or had charge pf such premises. We said in Miller v. State, 114 S. W. (2d) 244, that:

“Many people own ‘premises’ ■ on which there may be situated many residences, all of which may be occupied by people other than the owner, when he in fact lives — has his residence — at an entirely different place. It is true the officers testified that they knew the house searched was appellant’s residence, but such testimony would not supply the omission of such averment in the description of the property in the affidavit and warrant.” Also see 38 Tex. Jur., 56.

Again it was said in the case of Brown v. State, 124 S. W. (2d) 124:

> “Also we find in the affidavit and warrant no recital that appellant either occupied, possessed, or had charge of the premises to be searched. One of such recitals was essential to the validity of the affidavit and warrant.”

The affidavit and warrant issued thereunder being thus defective, the search of the house was illegal. Any testimony based upon such illegal search was inadmissible herein, and its admission requires a reversal of the judgment.

The State’s Attorney also confesses error in this cause.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—ALTERNATIVE PROMOTION AUTHORITY FOR OFFICERS IN DESIGNATED COMPETITIVE CATEGORIES

Sec.
649a.
Officers in designated competitive categories.
649b.
Selection for promotion.
649c.
Eligibility for consideration for promotion.
649d.
Opportunities for consideration for promotion.
649e.
Promotions.
649f.
Failure of selection for promotion.
649g.
Retirement: retirement for years of service; selective early retirement.
649h.
Continuation on active duty.
649i.
Continuation on active duty: officers in certain military specialties and career tracks.
649j.
Other administrative authorities.
649k.
Regulations.