alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 609

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 4, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4828) to designate wilderness areas and a cooperative management and protection area in the vicinity of

Steens Mountain in Harney County, Oregon, and for other

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against consideration of the bill are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered

for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the

amendment recommended by the Committee on Resources

now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an

original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute
2

•HRES 609 EH

printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII. That amendment in the nature

of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII.

Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone

until a time during further consideration in the Committee of

the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment;

and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another

electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the

minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series

of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the

nature of a substitute made in order as original text. The

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill

and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening
3

•HRES 609 EH

motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 700.533 Restrictions affecting travel and travel expense reimbursement. ( a ) When an employee is on officially authorized travel his or her expenses are reimbursed by the Government. The employee may not request nor accept reimbursement in cash or kind for travel expenses from any other source, even when the employee's expenses exceed the maximum Government allowance.
( b ) An employee who is authorized to attend a convention, seminar, or similar meeting while on official duty, whose travel is being paid by the sponsoring association, may not also claim travel expenses from the Government.
( c ) An employee may accept accommodations and expense reimbursement for attending meetings, functions, etc. in his or her private capacity and on his or her own time, provided that such acceptance does not produce an actual or apparent conflict of interest. This restriction prohibits an employee from accepting accommodations or reimbursement from anyone having or seeking business with the Commission.
( d ) Commission employees traveling on official business, as well as employees traveling on personal business, may not accept the use of private airplanes, cars, or other means of transportation offered at no expense by individuals conducting or seeking business dealings with the Commission, nor from clients of the Commission.
*Exception:* An employee may accept transportation and meals of modest value provided by a contractor or client in connection with official business when it is not practical to make arrangements for Government or commercial accommodations. The employee must receive prior approval of the supervisor in such case. This might occur, for example, if an employee were traveling to a remote area where no Government vehicle were available, or where there are no nearby restaurants or eating places. There is no prohibition against a contractor or private citizen traveling as a passenger in a Government vehicle driven by a Commission employee on official business, provided administrative procedures have been followed in making the travel arrangements.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffect of rivet or bolt holes on the ultimate strength developed by 24S-T and Alclad 75S-T sheet in incomplete diagonal tensionStrength tests were made of a number of 24S-T and Alclad 75S-T aluminum alloy shear webs to determine the effect of rivet or bolt holes on the shear strength. Data were obtained for webs which approached a condition of pure shear stress as well as for webs with well-developed diagonal tension. The rivet factor (pitch minus diameter), divided by pitch, was varied from approximately 0.81 to 0.62. These tests indicated that the shear stresses on the gross section were nearly constant for all values of the rivet factor investigated if the other properties of the web were not changed.Document ID19930081942Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOtherAuthorsLevin, L RossNelson, David HDate AcquiredAugust 16, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1947Report/Patent NumberNACA-TN-1177Accession Number93R11232Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930081942.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 477

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the disparity

between identical prescription drugs sold in the United States, Canada,

and Mexico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 2000

Mr. BALDACCI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the disparity between identical prescription drugs

sold in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

Whereas according to the General Accounting Office, a consumer in the United States pays on average one-third

more for a prescription drug than a consumer pays for

the same drug in another country;

Whereas currently one-third of senior citizens in the United

States are without prescription drug insurance, and these

individuals pay on average 15 percent more for a prescription than do citizens with prescription drug insurance coverage;
2

•HRES 477 IH

Whereas it is difficult for many Americans, including senior

citizens, to afford the prescription drugs that they need

to stay healthy;

Whereas many senior citizens in the United States leave the

country and go to Canada or Mexico to buy prescription

drugs that are developed, manufactured, and approved in

the United States in order to buy such drugs at lower

prices than such drugs are sold for in the United States;

Whereas the United States has made a strong commitment

to supporting the research and development of new drugs

through taxpayer-supported funding of the National Institutes of Health, through the research and development

tax credit, and through other means;

Whereas the development of new drugs is important because

the use of such drugs enables people to live longer and

lead healthier, more productive lives;

Whereas citizens of other countries should pay a portion of

the research and development costs for new drugs, or

their fair share of such costs, rather than just reap the

benefits of such drugs; and

Whereas many State governments are undertaking a variety

of plans to address the needs of citizens who lack affordable drug coverage: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the cost disparity between identical pre3 scription drugs sold in the United States, Canada, and

4 Mexico should be reduced or eliminated.

Æ
IV

House Calendar No. 306

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 625

[Report No. 106–972]

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 596) calling upon

the President to ensure that the foreign policy of the United States

reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity concerning issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing, and genocide documented in

the United States record relating to the Armenian Genocide, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 596)

calling upon the President to ensure that the foreign

policy of the United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity concerning issues related to

human rights, ethnic cleansing, and genocide documented

in the United States record relating to the Armenian

Genocide, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the resolution
2

HRES 625 RH

1 (H. Res. 596) calling upon the President to ensure that

2 the foreign policy of the United States reflects appropriate

3 understanding and sensitivity concerning issues related to

4 human rights, ethnic cleansing, and genocide documented

5 in the United States record relating to the Armenian

6 Genocide, and for other purposes. The resolution shall be

7 considered as read for amendment. The amendment in the

8 nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

9 International Relations now printed in the resolution shall

10 be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be

11 considered as ordered on the resolution, as amended, to

12 final adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one

13 hour of debate on the resolution, as amended, equally di14 vided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minor15 ity member of the Committee on International Relations;

16 and (2) one motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 306

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 625

[Report No. 106–972]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H.

Res. 596) calling upon the President to ensurethat the foreign policy of the United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivityconcerning issues related to human rights, ethniccleansing, and genocide documented in theUnited States record relating to the ArmenianGenocide, and for other purposes.

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of IIM Global Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifyto my knowledge that:

 

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

/s/ David Jones

Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: April 14, 2014
§ 20.325 Who can apply for Burial Assistance? If you are a relative of a deceased Indian, you can apply for burial assistance for the deceased Indian under this section. ( a ) To apply for burial assistance under this section, you must submit the application to the social services worker. You must submit this application within 180 days following death.
( b ) The Bureau will determine eligibility based on the income and resources available to the deceased in accordance with § 20.100. This includes but is not limited to SSI, veterans' death benefits, social security, and Individual Indian Money (IIM) accounts. Determination of need will be accomplished on a case-by-case basis using the Bureau payment standard.
( c ) The Bureau will not approve an application unless it meets the criteria specified at § 20.300.
( d ) The approved payment will not exceed the Bureau maximum burial payment standard established by the Assistant Secretary.
[65 FR 63159, Oct. 20, 2000, as amended at 81 FR 10477, Mar. 1, 2016]
§ 62.2 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this part are to provide procedures for the filing and processing of appeals from adverse enrollment actions by Bureau officials.
( b ) The regulations in this part are not applicable and do not provide procedures for the filing of appeals from adverse enrollment actions by tribal committees, unless: ( 1 ) The adverse enrollment action is incident to the preparation of a tribal roll subject to Secretarial approval; or
( 2 ) An appeal to the Secretary is provided for in the tribal governing document.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 427

Waiving clause 2(b) of rule XXII to permit introduction and consideration

of a certain bill.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 29, 2000

Mr. BLAGOJEVICH (for himself and Mr. LAHOOD) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Waiving clause 2(b) of rule XXII to permit introduction

and consideration of a certain bill.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of

2 clause 2(b) of rule XXII, Representative Blagojevich of

3 Illinois is hereby authorized to introduce, and the House

4 may consider, a bill to amend section 6103 of title 5,

5 United States Code, to establish Presidents’ Day in honor

6 of George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Franklin

7 Roosevelt.

Æ
#### § 543.16 [Reserved]
**Exhibit        32.1**

**Certification        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, **

**As        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of        2002**

| (1)   | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                |                              |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                               |                                                     |
|                          |                                           |                         |
|                               |                                           | /s/ David                Liu |
|                               | David                Liu                            |
|   Date: November 7, 2008 | Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 343 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 343

   Amending rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives to 
    prohibit the consideration of legislation that provides for the 
    designation or redesignation of any building, highway, or other 
   structure in honor of an individual who is serving as a Member of 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 1999

Mr. Tancredo (for himself, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Bilbray, Mrs. 
Chenoweth-Hage, Mr. Coble, Mrs. Cubin, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. 
 Goode, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. Hastings of Washington, Mr. Hayes, 
 Mr. Hyde, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Largent, Mr. 
 Ose, Mr. Paul, Mr. Petri, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. 
  Schaffer, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Weldon of 
 Florida, Mr. Wu, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Coburn, 
 Mr. DeMint, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Fletcher, Mr. Fossella, Mr. Greenwood, 
 Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Herger, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. 
  Kuykendall, Mr. Lazio, Mr. Linder, Mr. McCrery, Mr. Gary Miller of 
 California, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Rogan, Mr. Royce, Mr. Shays, Mr. Simpson, 
Mr. Terry, and Mr. Traficant) submitted the following resolution; which 
                 was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives to 
    prohibit the consideration of legislation that provides for the 
    designation or redesignation of any building, highway, or other 
   structure in honor of an individual who is serving as a Member of 
                               Congress.

    Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Designations of buildings, highways, and other structures
    ``5. It shall not be in order to consider a bill, joint resolution, 
amendment, or conference report that provides for the designation or 
redesignation of any building, highway, or other structure in honor of 
an individual who is serving as a Member of Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jamal Logan, Appellant, v Bernice Johnson, Respondent.

[825 NYS2d 242]

*759In an action, inter alia, to compel specific performance of an option to purchase certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated December 16, 2005, which, upon an order of the same court dated May 11, 2005, in effect, granting that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment on her counterclaim to recover unpaid rent, is in favor of the defendant and against him in the principal sum of $100,500.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The only issue on this appeal is whether the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff was liable to the defendant for unpaid rent.

When the plaintiff continued to reside at the defendant’s premises through July 2004 after his written lease expired in July 1998, the provisions in the lease remained in force for as long as he remained in possession of the premises *(see City of New York v Pennsylvania R.R. Co.,*37 NY2d 298, 300 [1975]; *Visken v Oriole Realty Corp.,*305 AD2d 493, 494 [2003]; *McClenan v Brancato Iron & Fence Works,*282 AD2d 722 [2001]). Despite having an option contract with the defendant to purchase the premises during a portion of the holdover period, a month-to-month tenancy was created when, upon holding over, the plaintiff paid and the defendant accepted the agreed-upon monthly rent of $1,500 for a number of months *(see*Real Property Law § 232-c; *Matter of Jaroslow v Lehigh Val. R.R. Co.,*23 NY2d 991 [1969]; *2955 Shell Assoc. v Kayani,*234 AD2d 287 [1996]; *Matter of Joyous Holdings v Volkswagen of Oneonta,*128 AD2d 1002, 1003 [1987]). Accordingly, the plaintiff was obligated to pay rent for the entire time he was in possession of the premises, and the Supreme Court did not err in awarding the defendant the sum of $1,500 per month for the 67-month period during which the plaintiff did not pay rent *(see Northvale Prop. Assoc. v Osram Sylvania,*300 AD2d 373 [2002]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
§ 585.5 How do I file a motion to intervene? ( a ) An entity or individual, whether acting on his or her own behalf or as an agent of another entity, not permitted to appeal, may be permitted to participate as a party to a pending appeal if the Commission finds that: ( 1 ) The final decision could directly and adversely affect it or the class it represents;
( 2 ) The individual or entity may contribute materially to the disposition of the proceedings;
( 3 ) The individual's or entity's interest is not adequately represented by existing parties; and
( 4 ) Intervention would not unfairly prejudice existing parties or delay resolution of the proceeding.
( b ) A tribe with jurisdiction over the lands on which there is a gaming operation that is the subject of a proceeding under this part may intervene as a matter of right if the tribe is not already a party.
( c ) A motion to intervene shall be submitted to the Commission within 10 days of the notice of appeal. The motion shall be filed with the Commission and served on each person who has been made a party at the time of filing. The motion shall succinctly state: ( 1 ) The moving party's interest in the proceeding;
( 2 ) How his or her participation as a party will contribute materially to the disposition of the proceeding;
( 3 ) Who will appear for the moving party;
( 4 ) The issues on which the moving party seeks to participate; and
( 5 ) Whether the moving party seeks to present witness affidavits.
( d ) Objections to the motion must be filed by any party within 10 days after service of the motion.
( e ) A reply brief to the brief in opposition may be filed within 5 days of service of the brief in opposition.
( f ) When motions to intervene are made by individuals or groups with common interests, the Commission may request all such movants to designate a single representative, or the Commission may recognize one or more movants.
( g ) The Commission shall give each movant and party written notice of the decision on the motion. For each motion granted, the Commission shall provide a brief statement of the reason(s) for the decision. If the motion is denied, the Commission shall briefly state the ground(s) for denial. The Commission may allow the movant to participate as *amicus curiae,* if appropriate.