alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frank J. Kujava, Respondent, v. Walter E. Irving, Appellant.

Motion denied." Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S JUNE 30, 2000 UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      47,972,000
<SECURITIES>                                88,542,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  855,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           139,019,000
<PP&E>                                       7,090,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,440,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             148,607,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,244,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 142,332,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               148,607,000
<SALES>                                      1,162,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,162,000
<CGS>                                          171,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,594,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,806,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,806,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,806,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.39)


</TABLE>
§ 241.6 Enforcement; violation of regulations; corrective action; penalties; closure of restrictions, Annette Islands Reserve. ( a ) *Enforcement.* The regulations in this part shall be enforced by any duly authorized representative of the Secretary of the Interior. Any fish trap, vessel, gear, processing establishment or other operation or equipment subject to the regulations of this part shall be available for inspection at all times by such representative.
( b ) *Violation of regulations.* Whenever any duly authorized enforcement representative of the Secretary of the Interior has reasonable cause to believe any violation of the regulations of this part relating to fish traps has occurred, he shall direct immediate closure of the trap involved and shall affix an appropriate seal thereto to prevent further fishing. The matter shall be reported without delay to the Area Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, who shall thereupon report and recommend to the Secretary of the Interior appropriate corrective action.
( c ) *Corrective action.* Any violation of the regulations of this part relating to fish traps shall be ground for the temporary or permanent closure, as the Secretary of the Interior may determine, of any or all traps authorized by § 241.3(a), or the withdrawal and rescission of the right to fish for salmon with traps at any or all sites authorized thereby.
( d ) *Penalties.* Any person who violates any of the regulations of this part shall be subject to prosecution under section 2 of the Act of July 12, 1960 (74 Stat. 469, 18 U.S.C. sec. 1165), which provides as follows: Whoever, without lawful authority or permission, willfully and knowingly goes upon any land that belongs to any Indian or Indian tribe, band, or group and either are held by the United States in trust or are subject to a restriction against alienation imposed by the United States, or upon any lands of the United States that are reserved for Indian use, for the purpose of hunting, trapping, or fishing thereon, or for the removal of game, peltries, or fish therefrom, shall be fined not more than $200 or imprisoned not more than ninety days, or both, and all game, fish, and peltries in his possession shall be forfeited.
( e ) *Closure or restriction, Annette Islands Reserve.* The Commissioner of Indian Affairs, after consultation with officials of the Metlakatla Indian Community, is authorized and directed, upon a determination of the necessity to promote sound conversation practices, to restrict or close to commercial, subsistence or sport fishing any portion of the Annette Islands Reserve by notice given appropriate local publicity.
[28 FR 7183, July 12, 1963, as amended at 30 FR 5742, Apr. 23, 1965. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
§ 273.128 How are contracts prioritized? Priority will be given to contracts: ( a ) Which would serve Indian students on or near reservations; and
( b ) Where a majority of the Indian students will be members of the Tribe(s) of those reservations.
# C_2006178EN.01003203.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/32

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 May 2006 — TeleTech Holdings v OHIM — Teletech International (TELETECH INTERNATIONAL)

(Case T-194/05) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Extent of the examination required - Conversion of a Community trade mark application to a national trade mark application - Article 58 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 178/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TeleTech Holdings, Inc. (Denver, Colorado, United States) (represented by: A. Gould and M. Blair, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Teletech International SA (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-F. Adelle and F. Zimeray, lawyers)

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2005 (R 497/2004-1), relating to opposition proceedings between TeleTech Holdings, Inc. and Teletech International SA

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by the intervener. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by the intervener.

| 3. | The intervener shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The intervener shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 9.7.2005.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.0
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Period Ended June 30, 2007
  1.
    
    The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, (the Form
10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
 2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 9, 2007
    /s/ Thomas S. WuThomas S. WuChairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer Date:  August 9, 2007
    /s/ Dennis WuDennis WuDirector, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Liu, Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






/s/
      David
      Liu


David
      Liu


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer








Date:
      August 7, 2008






-
      38
      -
H. Res. 456

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 15, 2000.

Whereas in 1957 the Arapahoe Rescue Patrol, a non-profit

organization that assists law enforcement agencies, fire

departments and search and rescue missions, was established;

Whereas Stan Bush founded this program in 1957 to gather

volunteers for community service to meet in the basement

of Fire Station 12 in Littleton, Colorado;

Whereas this group has participated in 43 years of public

service to the Denver metro area including: conducting

search and rescue efforts, assisting in emergencies, and

aiding in automobile accidents and fires;

Whereas over a thousand students have participated in the

program and been involved in 2,226 rescue missions and

contributed countless thousands of hours of community

service; and

Whereas the commitment of these youths must be recognized

to promote positive after school activities for today’s

young people: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the Congress recognizes the Arapahoe Rescue Patrol of Littleton, Colorado for its 43 years of service to the
2

•HRES 456 EH

local community, strong commitment from young adults, and

selfless acts of community service to encourage positive outlets for young adults, teaching them a sense of commitment,

responsibility, and belonging, all qualities essential to provide

youth with the tools they need to succeed in the future.

Attest:

Clerk.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-35 

January 13, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022(a) Benefits Guaranteed. Type of Benefits Guaranteed 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your recent inquiry concerning the * * * Employee's Pension Trust (the Plan). You have asked

whether borrowing by Plan participants against their policies in excess of the amount permitted to be borrowed by the

terms of the Plan would result in the payment of benefits by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) for which

the company would be liable upon the termination of the Plan. 

Assuming that the excess borrowing does not result in the loss of the Plan's tax qualification, the Plan is covered

under Section 4021(a) of Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act). 

Under the Act, the PBGC insures paricipants in a covered pension plan against the possibility that they will not

receive non-forfeitable, "basic" benefits provided by a plan in the event the employer terminates it without having funded

those non-forfeitable, basic benefits. That is, the PBGC guarantees, within limits specified in the Act, all non-forfeitable

benefits under the plan other than those benefits which become nonforfeitable solely because of the termination of the

Plan. Thus, nonforfeitable [*2] benefits are determined on the basis of a participant's vested interest on termination of

employment. 

The Plan provides, in section 8.2, that a terminated participant "shall be entitled to receive the cash value of any

insurance or annuity policy issued on his life and held by the Trustees for his benefit." That section also provides for the

transfer of "complete ownership of all policies then held for his benefit" to the participants. Since some participants have

loans outstanding against their policies, unless there is anything to the contrary in the insurance policies, the PBGC will

consider cash value to mean net cash value, i.e. cash surrender value less indebtedness, for the purposes of determining

a participant's vested interest. The transfer to a participant on termination of the Plan of his insurance policy will result

in the distribution of his entire vested interest under the Plan. Therefore, no basic benefits will have to be paid by the

PBGC and, accordingly, no employer liability can be imposed. 

I trust this answers your inquiry. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**PETERSON& CO.**

**CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

** **

**A Partnership of Professional Corporations**

** **

**Richard E. Evans • Thomas J. Brady • Teofilo C. Reynoso •David W. Cortney • James Anthony Ande**

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS'**

 

 

The Board of Directors

Composite Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries

3252 Holiday court, Suite 206

La Jolla, California 92037-1808

 

As the independent public accountants' forComposite Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries, we hereby consent to theincorporation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Composite Solutions,Inc., our report dated August 20, 2002, regarding the June 30, 2002 and 2001,consolidated financial statements.  Wealso consent to all other references to our company included in this annualreport.

 

 

 

/s/ Peterson & Co.

Peterson & Co.

 

 

Peterson & Co.

3655 Nobel Drive, Suite 500

San Diego, California 92122-1089

 

 

 

3655Nobel Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, California 92122 • Phone (858) 597-4100 •Fax (858) 597-4111

SanDiego • Ramona

E-mail:info@petersonco.com • Web site: www.petersonco.com

Members:American Institute of Certified Public Accountants • California Society ofPublic Accountants

 

 

----
§ 1000.41 What types of grants are available? Three categories of grants may be available: ( a ) Negotiation grants may be awarded to the Tribes/Consortia that have been selected from the applicant pool as described in subpart B of this part;
( b ) Planning grants may be available to Tribes/Consortia requiring advance funding to meet the planning phase requirement of the Act; and
( c ) Financial assistance may be available to Tribes/Consortia to plan for negotiating for non-BIA programs, as described in subpart D and §§ 1000.42-1000.45 of this subpart.
NUMBER 13-20-00030-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

ADOLFO GARCIA YBARRA JR., Appellant,

v.

WARDEN STRONG, ET AL., Appellees.

On appeal from the 278th District Court

of Walker County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

On October 5, 2020, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his brief in this 

cause was past due. On December 2, 2020, the Court received correspondence from 

appellant indicating he has not received communication from his court-appointed counsel. 

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings, pursuant to Rule 38.8(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 
Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make 

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) why appellant's 

counsel has failed to file a brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the 

appeal; (2) whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (3) 

whether appellant's counsel should be removed; and (4) whether appellant remains

indigent and entitled to court appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that 

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to courtappointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this 

appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone 

number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing 

counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of 

any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this the

14th day of December.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 297 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 297

Expressing sympathy for the victims of the devastating earthquake that 
                  struck Taiwan on September 21, 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 1999

 Mr. Bereuter (for himself, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. 
     Hastings of Florida, Mr. Royce, Mr. Payne, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. 
 Rohrabacher, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Berman, Mr. Brown of Ohio, 
 Mr. Hoeffel, and Mr. Ortiz) submitted the following resolution; which 
        was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing sympathy for the victims of the devastating earthquake that 
                  struck Taiwan on September 21, 1999.

Whereas on the morning of September 21, 1999, a devastating and deadly 
        earthquake shook the counties of Nantou and Taichung, Taiwan, killing 
        more that 1,700 people, injuring more than 4,000, and leaving more than 
        100,000 homeless;
Whereas the earthquake of January 21, 1999, has left thousands of buildings in 
        ruin, caused widespread fires, and destroyed highways and other 
        infrastructure;
Whereas the strength, courage, and determination of the people of Taiwan has 
        been displayed since the earthquake;
Whereas the people of the United States and Taiwan share strong friendship and 
        mutual interests and respect;
Whereas the United States has offered whatever technical assistance might be 
        needed and has dispatched the Urban Search and Rescue Team of Fairfax 
        County, Virginia; and
Whereas offers of assistance have come from the Governments of Japan, Singapore, 
        the People's Republic of China, Turkey, and others: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its deepest sympathies to the citizens of 
        Nantou and Taichung and all of Taiwan for the tragic losses 
        suffered as a result of the earthquake of September 21, 1999;
            (2) expresses its support for the people of Taiwan as they 
        continue their efforts to rebuild their cities and their lives;
            (3) expresses support for disaster assistance being 
        provided by the United States Agency for International 
        Development and other relief agencies; and
            (4) recognizes and encourages the important assistance that 
        also could be provided by other nations to alleviate the 
        suffering of the people of Taiwan.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1954-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-1954-DR), dated February 4, 2011, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         February 11, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Jersey is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of February 4, 2011.

Atlantic and Cumberland Counties for Public Assistance.

Atlantic and Cumberland Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B), including snow assistance, under the Public Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour period during or proximate to the incident period.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2011-4050 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P