alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Unemployment Insurance and Reserves in the United States: A Selected List of Recent References

              																	Thompson, Laura A. (Laura Amelia), 1877-1949					 and 	United States. Department of Labor. Library. 						*Unemployment Insurance and Reserves in the United States: A Selected List of Recent References : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 611*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										January 1935,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4133,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the “**Company**”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “**Report**”),I, Norman M. Blashka, EVP and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|   | /s/                |
|--------|--------------------|
|   | Norman M.  Blashka |
|   |               |
|   | November 14,  2002 |

 

----
# C_2006184EN.01000101.xml

| 8.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 August 2006

(2006/C 184/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2850 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4613 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67400 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1850 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5720 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8785 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5756 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,273 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8717 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5144 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,67 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,680 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8839 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6863 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4470 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9916 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0623 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0231 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 236,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,7467 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2400 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2780 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 654,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,706 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,068 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3230 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,496 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2850

JPY

Japanese yen

147,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4613

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67400

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1850

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5720

ISK

Iceland króna

90,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8785

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5756

CZK

Czech koruna

28,273

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8717

RON

Romanian leu

3,5144

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,67

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,680

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8839

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6863

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4470

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9916

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0623

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0231

KRW

South Korean won

1 236,94

ZAR

South African rand

8,7467

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2400

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2780

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 654,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,706

PHP

Philippine peso

66,068

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3230

THB

Thai baht

48,496

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
H. Res. 652

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 26, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2614) to amend the Small Business Investment

Act to make improvements to the certified development company program, and for other purposes. All points of order

against the conference report and against its consideration

are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 63.2 Policy.

In enacting the Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act, the Congress recognized there is no resource more vital to the continued existence and integrity of Indian tribes than their children and that the United States has a direct interest, as trustee, in protecting Indian children who are members of, or are eligible for membership in, an Indian tribe. The minimum standards of character and suitability of employment for individuals ensure that Indian children are protected, and the Indian child protection and family violence prevention programs will emphasize the unique values of Indian culture and community involvement in the prevention and treatment of child abuse, child neglect and family violence.
# C_2006249EN.01000801.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/8

---

Action brought on 7 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-364/06)

(2006/C 249/17)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (1), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (1), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive.

1

| — | order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2002/15/EC into domestic law expired on 23 March 2005.

---

(1)  JO 2002 L 80, p. 35.

1

---
### [§9836. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title III, §375(c)(1)(D), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 84]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 594, prohibited unauthorized disposition of individual equipment by enlisted members of the Air Force.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2014 - 0234 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM220AD

145LEG - 53 - A032 --- 9/20/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
(No. 30568.

#### The People *ex rel.*Charles F. Deatherage *et al.,*Appellees, *vs.*John Radford *et al.,*Appellants.

*Opinion filed September 24, 1948.*

Omer Poos, of Hillsboro, and Murphy & Murphy, of Carlinville, for appellants.

John W. Curren, State’s Attorney, and Barber & Barber, (Clayton J. Barber, Alton G. Hall, and Samuel C. Fielden, of counsel,) all of Springfield, for appellees.

*24Mr. Justice Daily

delivered the opinion of the court:

On December 3, 1947, a complaint in *quo warranto*was filed in the circuit court of Sangamon County, in the name of the People on relation of Charles F. Deatherage and others, who constituted the board of education of Waverly Community Unit School District No. 6. The complaint challenged the validity of Virden Community Unit School District No. 4, and the authority of the board of education elected pursuant to the formation of said district. The complaint alleged that a portion of the Virden district overlapped into the territory of the previously formed Waverly district, The answer of the Virden district set forth its compliance with sections 8-9 through 8-13 of the School Code, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, chap. 122, pars. 8-9, 8-13,) and by way of counterclaim challenged the validity of the Waverly district for its failure to comply with section 16 of “An Act in relation to the survey and reorganization of school d|stricts and making an appropriation therefor,” as amended August 7, 1947. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, chap. 122, par. 728.) The Waverly district filed a motion to strike the answer, thus raising the issue of the applicability of section 16. The trial court granted the motion and the officers of said Virden district having elected to stand on their pleading, judgment of ouster was entered against them. They appeal directly to this court, the construction and validity of a statute being involved.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the provisions of the aforementioned section 16 must be complied with by community unit school districts organizing under paragraphs 8-9 through 8-14 of the School Code. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, chap. 122, pars. 8-9 through 8-14.) The same issue was the one before this court in the case of *Radford*v. *Withrow, ante,*p. 14, in which a detailed opinion has been filed at this term of court. What was said there is applicable here and renders unnecessary any further discussion of the context of the statutes or our *25interpretation of them. It will suffice to say that we have found that community unit school districts being organized are not subject to the provisions of section 16 of the act relating to survey and reorganization. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, chap. 122, par. 628.) The organization of the Waverly district was therefore valid and that of the Virden district invalid. The judgment of the circuit court of Sangamon county is affirmed*.*

*TJudgment affirmed.*
# C_2006224EN.01003702.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/37

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-225/04) (1)

1

(Structural Funds - Financing of Community initiatives - Amendment of indicative allocations - Enforcement of the final judgment - Annulling judgment)

(2006/C 224/80)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: A. Cingolo, P. Gentili and D. Del Gaizo, and subsequently by P. Gentili and D. Del Gaizo, avvocati dello Stato, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. de March and J. Flynn, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2003) 3971 final of 26 November 2003 establishing indicative allocations between the Member States of the commitment appropriations under Community initiatives for the period 1994-1999 and of all related prior measures

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and the costs of the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and the costs of the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004 (Case C-60/04).

1

---
# C_2006281EN.01002902.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/29

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 September 2006 — British Aggregates v Commission

(Case T-210/02) (1)

1

(State aid - Environmental tax on aggregates in the United Kingdom - Commission Decision not to raise objections - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Person individually concerned - Selective character - Obligation to state adequate reasons - Diligent and impartial examination)

(2006/C 281/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: British Aggregates Association (Lanark, United Kingdom) (represented by C. Pouncey, Solicitor, and L. Van Den Hende, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by J. Flett and S. Meany, agents)

Defendant(s):

Interveners in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by P. Ormond, and subsequently by T. Harris and R. Caudwell, acting as Agents, assisted initially by J. Stratford and M. Hall, Barristers, and subsequently by M. Hall)

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Partial annulment of Commission Decision C (2002) 1478 final of 24 April 2002 on State aid file N 863/01 — United Kingdom/Aggregates Levy

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission;

| 3. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs

---

(1)  OJ C 219, 14.9.2002

1

---
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








Michael V. Shustek, as President and Chief Executive Officer of MVP REIT, Inc. (the “Registrant”), and Dustin Lewis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








Date: December 12, 2014





/s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. ShustekPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)MVP REIT, Inc.











Date: December 12, 2014





/s/ Dustin LewisDustin LewisChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)

MVP REIT, Inc.
§ 700.213 Methods of providing last resort replacement housing. ( a ) *General.* The methods of providing last resort housing include, but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Rehabilitation of, and/or additions to, an existing replacement dwelling;
( 2 ) A replacement housing payment in excess of the limits set forth in subparts E and F of this part or the provision of direct Commission mortgage financing;
( 3 ) The construction of a new replacement dwelling;
( 4 ) The relocation and, if necessary, rehabilitation of a replacement dwelling;
( 5 ) The purchase of land and/or a replacement dwelling by the Commission and subsequent sale or lease to, or exchange with, a displaced person; and
( 6 ) The removal of barriers to the handicapped as may be necessary.
Exhibit 99.9




image
Principal Officers:

Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.

President & CEO

Jodi L. Anhorn, P. Eng.

Executive Vice President & COO



Officers / Vice Presidents:

Caralyn P. Bennett, P. Eng.

Tim R. Freeborn, P. Eng.

Leonard L. Herchen, P. Eng.

Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng.

Todd J. Ikeda, P. Eng.

Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.

Mark Jobin, P. Geol.

John E. Keith, P. Eng.




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS
   
 We refer to our report dated March 9, 2015 and effective December 31, 2014, evaluating the petroleum and natural gas reserves attributable to Crescent Point Energy Corp. and its affiliates, which is entitled "Reserves Assessment and Evaluation of Canadian and American Oil and Gas Properties (the "Report").
 
 We hereby consent to the references to our name in the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 We also confirm that we have read the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 dated March 10, 2015, and that we have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that was derived from the Report or that is within our knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with such Report.
 
 Yours truly,
 
 GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.
 Image
 Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.
 Vice President
 
 Dated: March 10, 2015
 Calgary, Alberta
 CANADA







4100, 400 – 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2 ·(403) 266-9500 ·Fax (403) 262-1855 ·GLJPC.com
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 05 69 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 0 -NM - 24 0 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### § 273.102 How will revision or amendments be made to this part?

Prior to making any substantive revisions or amendments to this part, the Secretary will consult with Indian Tribes and national and regional Indian organizations to the extent practicable about the need for revision or amendment and will consider their views in preparing the proposed revision or amendment. Nothing in this section precludes Indian Tribes or national or regional Indian organizations from initiating a request for revisions or amendments.
##### 



Exhibit 32.0
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Period Ended September 30, 2005
  1.
    
    The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
 2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  November 9, 2005
    /s/ Thomas S. WuThomas S. WuChairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer Date:  November 9, 2005
    /s/ Dennis WuDennis WuDirector, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer