69602 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 231 / Friday, December 1, 2006 / Notices 

conflicts with 10 CFR 30.36(d), 

requiring that decommissioning of 

byproduct material facilities be 

completed and approved by the NRC 

after licensed activities cease. The 

NRC’s analysis of the Licensee’s final 

status survey data confirmed that the 

Facility meets the requirements of 10 

CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted release and 

for license termination. Additionally, 

denying the amendment request would 

result in no change in current 

environmental impacts. The 

environmental impacts of the proposed 

action and the no-action alternative are 

therefore similar, and the no-action 

alternative is accordingly not further 

considered. 

Conclusion 

The NRC staff has concluded that the 

proposed action is consistent with the 

NRC’s unrestricted release criteria 

specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Because 

the proposed action will not 

significantly impact the quality of the 

human environment, the NRC staff 

concludes that the proposed action is 

the preferred alternative. 

Agencies and Persons Consulted 

NRC provided a draft of this 

Environmental Assessment to the 

Commonwealth of Virginia for review 

on October 17, 2006. On October 24, 

2006, the Commonwealth of Virginia, 

Division of Radiological Health and 

Safety Regulation, responded by e-mail. 

The Commonwealth agreed with the 

conclusions of the EA, and otherwise 

had no comments. 

The NRC staff has determined that the 

proposed action is of a procedural 

nature, and will not affect listed species 

or critical habitat. Therefore, no further 

consultation is required under Section 7 

of the Endangered Species Act. The 

NRC staff has also determined that the 

proposed action is not the type of 

activity that has the potential to cause 

effects on historic properties. Therefore, 

no further consultation is required 

under Section 106 of the National 

Historic Preservation Act. 

III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

The NRC staff has prepared this EA in 

support of the proposed action. On the 

basis of this EA, the NRC finds that 

there are no significant environmental 

impacts from the proposed action, and 

that preparation of an environmental 

impact statement is not warranted. 

Accordingly, the NRC has determined 

that a Finding of No Significant Impact 

is appropriate. 

IV. Further Information 

Documents related to this action, 

including the application for license 

amendment and supporting 

documentation, are available 

electronically at the NRC’s Electronic 

Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/ 

reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, 

you can access the NRC’s Agencywide 

Document Access and Management 

System (ADAMS), which provides text 

and image files of NRC’s public 

documents. The documents related to 

this action are listed below, along with 

their ADAMS accession numbers. 

1. Letters dated September 30, 2006, 

(ML062770396) and October 16, 2006, 

(ML062900505); 

2. NUREG–1757, ‘‘Consolidated 

NMSS Decommissioning Guidance;’’

3. Title 10 Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E, 

‘‘Radiological Criteria for License 

Termination;’’

4. Title 10, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 51, ‘‘Environmental 

Protection Regulations for Domestic 

Licensing and Related Regulatory 

Functions;’’

5. NUREG–1496, ‘‘Generic 

Environmental Impact Statement in 

Support of Rulemaking on Radiological 

Criteria for License Termination of NRCLicensed Nuclear Facilities.’’

If you do not have access to ADAMS, 

or if there are problems in accessing the 

documents located in ADAMS, contact 

the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) 

Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–

415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. 

These documents may also be viewed 

electronically on the public computers 

located at the NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR 

reproduction contractor will copy 

documents for a fee. 

Dated at 475 Allendale Road, King of 

Prussia, Pennsylvania this 20th day of 

November 2006. 

For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

James P. Dwyer, 

Chief Commercial and R&D Branch, Division 

of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region 1. 

[FR Doc. E6–20327 Filed 11–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY 

CORPORATION 

PBGC Flat Premium Rates 

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation. 

ACTION: Notice of flat premium rates. 

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public 

of the PBGC flat premium rates for 

premium payment years beginning in 

2007. These rates can be derived from 

information published elsewhere but are 

published in this notice for the 

convenience of the public. 

DATES: The flat premium rates apply to 

premium payment years beginning in 

2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine B. Klion, Manager, Regulatory 

and Policy Division, Legislative and 

Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit 

Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–326–

4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the 

Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–

877–8339 and ask to be connected to 

202–326–4024.) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

(PBGC) administers the pension plan 

termination insurance program under 

Title IV of the Employee Retirement 

Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). 

Pension plans covered by Title IV must 

pay premiums to PBGC. Section 4006 of 

ERISA deals with premium rates. 

The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 

(Pub. L. 109–171) (DRA 2005) amends 

section 4006 of ERISA. DRA 2005 

changes the per-participant flat 

premium rate for plan years beginning 

in 2006 from $19 to $30 for singleemployer plans and from $2.60 to $8 for 

multiemployer plans and provides for 

inflation adjustments to the flat rates for 

future years. The adjustments are based 

on changes in the national average wage 

index as defined in section 209(k)(1) of 

the Social Security Act, with a two-year 

lag—for example, for 2007, the 2005 

index is compared to the baseline (the 

2004 index). The new provisions are 

written in such a way that the premium 

rate can never go down; if the change in 

the national average wage index is 

negative, the premium rate remains the 

same as in the preceding year. Also, 

premium rates are rounded to the 

nearest whole dollar. 

The baseline national average wage 

index, the 2004 index, was $35,648.55. 

The 2005 index is $36,952.94. The ratio 

of the 2005 index to the 2004 index is 

1.03659. Multiplying this ratio by 

$30.00 gives $31.10 which rounds to 

$31.00. Multiplying the ratio by $8.00 

gives $8.29, which rounds to $8.00. 

Thus, the 2007 flat premium rates for 

PBGC’s two insurance programs will be 

$31.00 per participant for singleemployer plans and $8.00 per 

participant for multiemployer plans. 

The PBGC will publish the flat 

premium rates annually for the 

convenience of the public. 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 231 / Friday, December 1, 2006 / Notices 69603 

Issued in Washington, DC, on this 17th day 

of November 2006. 

Vincent K. Snowbarger, 

Interim Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. E6–20386 Filed 11–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7709–01–P 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

which provides opportunity for public 

comment on new or revised data 

collections, the Railroad Retirement 

Board (RRB) will publish periodic 

summaries of proposed data collections. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed information collection is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information has practical 

utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s 

estimate of the burden of the collection 

of the information; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (d) 

ways to minimize the burden related to 

the collection of information on 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Title and purpose of information 

collection: Appeal Under the Railroad 

Retirement and Railroad Unemployment 

Insurance Act; OMB 3220–0007 Under 

Section 7(b)(3) of the Railroad 

Retirement Act (RRA), and section 5(c) 

of the Railroad Unemployment 

Insurance Act (RUIA) any person 

aggrieved by a decision on his or her 

application for an annuity or benefit 

under that Act has the right to appeal to 

the RRB. This right is prescribed in 20 

CFR 260 and 20 CFR 320. The 

notification letter sent to the individual 

at the time of the original action on the 

application informs the applicant of 

such right. When an individual protests 

a decision, the concerned bureau 

reviews the entire file and any 

additional evidence submitted and 

sends the applicant a letter explaining 

the basis of the determination. The 

applicant is then notified that if he or 

she wishes to protest further, they can 

appeal to the RRB’s Bureau of Hearings 

and Appeals. The procedure pertaining 

to the filing of such an appeal is 

prescribed in 20 CFR 260.5 and 260.9 

and 20 CFR 320.12 and 320.38. 

The form prescribed by the RRB for 

filing an appeal under the RRA or RUIA 

is form HA–1, Appeal Under the 

Railroad Retirement Act or Railroad 

Unemployment Insurance Act. The form 

asks the applicant to furnish the basis 

for the appeal and what additional 

evidence, if any, is to be submitted. 

Completion is voluntary, however if the 

information is not provided the RRB 

cannot process the appeal. 

The RRB proposes no changes to 

Form HA–1. The completion time for 

the HA–1 is estimated at 20 minutes per 

response. The RRB estimates that 

approximately 650 Form HA–1’s are 

completed annually. 

Additional Information or Comments: 

To request more information or to 

obtain a copy of the information 

collection justification, forms, and/or 

supporting material, please call the RRB 

Clearance Officer at (312) 751–3363 or 

send an e-mail request to 

Charles.Mierzwa@RRB.GOV. Comments 

regarding the information collection 

should be addressed to Ronald J. 

Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 

North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 

60611–2092 or send an e-mail to 

Ronald.Hodapp@RRB.GOV. Written 

comments should be received within 60 

days of this notice. 

Charles Mierzwa, 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. E6–20345 Filed 11–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7905–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[File No. 22–28824] 

Application and Opportunity for 

Hearing: Software Brokers of America, 

Inc. 

November 27, 2006. 

The Securities and Exchange 

Commission gives notice that Software 

Brokers of America, Inc. has filed an 

application under Section 304(d) of the 

Trust Indenture Act of 1939. Software 

Brokers of America asks the 

Commission to exempt from the 

certificate or opinion delivery 

requirements of Section 314(d) of the 

1939 Act certain provisions of an 

indenture dated August 25, 2005, as 

supplemented by an indenture dated 

October 31, 2006, between Intcomex, 

Inc., Software Brokers of America, 

Intcomex Holdings, LLC, Intcomex 

Holdings SPC–I, LLC, and The Bank of 

New York, as trustee. The indenture 

relates to 113⁄4% Second Priority Senior 

Secured Notes due 2011. 

Section 304(d) of the 1939 Act, in 

part, authorizes the Commission to 

exempt conditionally or 

unconditionally any indenture from one 

or more provisions of the 1939 Act. The 

Commission may provide an exemption 

under Section 304(d) if it finds that the 

exemption is necessary or appropriate 

in the public interest and consistent 

with the protection of investors and the 

purposes fairly intended by the 1939 

Act. 

Section 314(d) requires the obligor to 

furnish to the indenture trustee 

certificates or opinions of fair value 

from an engineer, appraiser or other 

expert upon any release of collateral 

from the lien of the indenture. The 

engineer, appraiser or other expert must 

opine that the proposed release will not 

impair the security under the indenture 

in contravention of the provisions of the 

indenture. The application requests an 

exemption from Section 314(d) for 

specified dispositions of collateral that 

are made in Software Brokers of 

America’s ordinary course of business. 

In its application, Software Brokers of 

America alleges that: 

1. The indenture permits Software 

Brokers of America to dispose of 

collateral in the ordinary course of its 

business; 

2. Intcomex will deliver to the trustee 

annual consolidated financial 

statements audited by certified 

independent accountants; and 

3. Software Brokers of America will 

deliver to the trustee a semi-annual 

certificate stating that all dispositions of 

collateral during the relevant six-month 

period occurred in Software Brokers of 

America’s ordinary course of business 

and that all of the proceeds were used 

as permitted by the indenture. 

Any interested persons should look to 

the application for a more detailed 

statement of the asserted matters of fact 

and law. The application is on file in 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Section, File Number 22–28824, 100 F 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549. 

The Commission also gives notice that 

any interested persons may request, in 

writing, that a hearing be held on this 

matter. Interested persons must submit 

those requests to the Commission no 

later than December 27, 2006. Interested 

persons must include the following in 

their request for a hearing on this 

matter: 

—The nature of that person’s interest; 

—the reasons for the request; and 

—the issues of law or fact raised by the 

application that the interested person 

desires to refute or request a hearing 

on. 

The interested person should address 

this request for a hearing to: Nancy M. 

Morris, Secretary, Securities and 

Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, 

NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. At 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1