alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-120 

December 14, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4067 Arrangements for Payment of Employer Liability 

OPINION: 

 This has reference to your letter of * * * containing your proposal, on behalf of * * * (the "Company"), for the

payment of employer liability in connection with * * * (the "Plan"). Your letter was in response to a letter of demand,

dated * * * for payment of employer liability, pursuant to Section 4068(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security

Act of 1974 (the "Act"), from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC" ) to the Company for the sum of

* * * plus any outstanding liability of the Plan for services rendered thereto. 

We have reviewed the Company's proposal and have found it unacceptable for the following reasons. 

First, the Company proposes to use an "alternative termination date" to compute the amount of employer liability.

This is unacceptable because, inter alia, the Act requires that * * * employer liability be determined as of the date of plan

* * * termination. The date of Plan termination has been agreed to be March 31, 1975, the date of termination proposed

by the plan administrator in its termination notice. 

 Second, the Company proposes to pay the amount of its employer liability within [*2] thirty (30) days after a final

decision is rendered in the Connolly case. We do not consider the Connolly case to affect collection of employer liability

in this case. 

Third, the Company proposes to pay the amount of the liability without interest. It is our position that interest

accrues on such liability at an appropriate rate. 

Fourth, the Company proposes to pay its employer liability ". . . in an equivalent face amount of bonds traded on

the New York Exchange . . ." Under this proposal, the PBGC would accept bonds with a face or par value equal to the

amount of the employer liability regardless of their current market value. The amount of the discount and consequent

loss to the PBGC could be substantial. Subsequent conversion of such bonds also would involve expenses that would

reduce further their realizable value. Consequently, such form of payment is not acceptable. 

Accordingly, the PBGC, pursuant to Section 4068 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1368, again hereby makes demand upon

you for the payment of the Company's liability under Section 4062 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1362, which has been

calculated to be * * * plus any outstanding liability of the Plan for services [*3] rendered thereto. Failure to pay said

liability, plus interest, within fourteen (14) days from receipt of this letter, will be deemed to be a refusal within the

meaning of Section 4068(a) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1368(a), to pay the amount demanded. Thereupon, the PBGC will

consider taking such action as might be appropriate under the circumstances. However, we remain available to discuss

an alternative Company proposal for payment of its liability. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-55 

April 20, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041(a) Termination by Plan Administrator. Filing of Notice of Intent to Terminate 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter dated March 18, 1976, in which you requested that a waiver of the termination

procedure set forth in Section 4041 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act"), be granted

to * * * excusing that corporation from the requirement of filing a notice of intent to terminate with the Pension Benefit

Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC"). 

Section 4041 of the Act and PBGC Reg. Section 2604.1 et seq., 40 Fed. Reg. 42534 (1975), require that prior to

the termination of a covered employee benefit plan, the plan administrator must file a notice with the PBGC that the plan

is to be terminated. No provision is made in Section 4041 of the Act or in the corresponding regulations for a waiver

of the obligation to file such notice. Inasmuch as the filing of notice with the PBGC is mandatory, a waiver of the filing

will not be granted. 

Section 2604.4(d) of the regulations, however, provides a procedure by which a plan administrator or his

representative may request the PBGC to grant a waiver of the obligation to include certain information required to be

filed [*2] pursuant to Reg. Section 2604.4. Should you request that certain required items not be included in the notice

of intent to terminate, the request must be in writing, and state the reasons for the relief sought. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### [§2830. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. B, title XXVIII, §2812(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4326]

Section, added Pub. L. 97–214, §2(a), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 162; amended Pub. L. 99–348, title III, §304(a)(4), July 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 703; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VI, §632(a), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1105; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VI, §603(d)(2)(B), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1782; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314, related to occupancy of substandard family housing units.
§ 543.12 What are the minimum internal control standards for gaming promotions and player tracking systems? ( a ) *Supervision.* Supervision must be provided as needed for gaming promotions and player tracking by an agent(s) with authority equal to or greater than those being supervised.
( b ) *Gaming promotions.* The rules of the gaming promotion must be displayed or made readily available to patron upon request. Gaming promotions rules require TGRA approval and must include the following: ( 1 ) The rules of play;
( 2 ) The nature and value of the associated prize(s) or cash award(s);
( 3 ) Any restrictions or limitations on participant eligibility;
( 4 ) The date(s), time(s), and location(s) for the associated promotional activity or activities;
( 5 ) Any other restrictions or limitations, including any related to the claim of prizes or cash awards;
( 6 ) The announcement date(s), time(s), and location(s) for the winning entry or entries; and
( 7 ) Rules governing promotions offered across multiple gaming operations, third party sponsored promotions, and joint promotions involving third parties.
( c ) *Player tracking systems and gaming promotions.* ( 1 ) Changes to the player tracking systems, promotion and external bonusing system parameters, which control features such as the awarding of bonuses, the issuance of cashable credits, non-cashable credits, coupons and vouchers, must be performed under the authority of supervisory agents, independent of the department initiating the change. Alternatively, the changes may be performed by supervisory agents of the department initiating the change if sufficient documentation is generated and the propriety of the changes are randomly verified by supervisory agents independent of the department initiating the change on a monthly basis.
( 2 ) All other changes to the player tracking system must be appropriately documented.
( d ) *Variances.* The operation must establish, as approved by the TGRA, the threshold level at which a variance must be reviewed to determine the cause. Any such review must be documented.
### Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s Th e Us e o f

Seat-Strappin g Metho dfo r Carryin g aWheelchai r Rulemakin g Documen t

Title : o n a n Aircraf t ^^ ^ RIN : 9ins-AnR 7 Withrespec t

t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.0.12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n 6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee n me t i n accordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

__^^ ^ Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio n an d Regulatory Affair s (OIRA) . ^ N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) after it wa s submitte dt o OIRA , Th e require dinformatio n i s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t for th e submissio n o f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O (§801 ) hav e bee n me t i n accordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

' Thi s documen t

i s no t afinal rule . _^^^

_Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . Th e documen t

ha s bee n submitte dt o C-5 0 for transmissio n t o Congres s an dGAO .
J . 

# ^ n Signatur e Nam e Title/Office

05/26/201 1
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

                              -  1 
                              -  2 
                              -  3 
                              -  4 
                              -  5 
                              -  6 
                              -  7 
                              -  8 

Wild Things: U.S., Thai Marines Face the Beast in Jungle Survival TrainingMarch 1, 2017 — CAMP BAN CHAN KREM, Thailand -- U.S. service members and Thai Marines participated in jungle survival training Feb. 16-17, 2017 at Ban Chan Krem, Thailand as a part of Cobra Gold 17. Marines from... MORE 

----

                              -  1 
                              -  2 
                              -  3 
                              -  4 
                              -  5 
                              -  6 
                              -  7 
                              -  8 

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)December (77)November (97)October (119)September (116)August (145)July (92)June (129)May (127)April (128)March (141)February (102)January (83)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 26.21 Can this program be combined with other similar programs for maximum benefit?

Yes, combining this program with other programs is encouraged, to the extent that laws governing program services permit partnering with similar programs and resources.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 10

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Received

RESOLUTION

Appointing the authorizing managers for the impeachment

trial of William Jefferson Clinton, President of the

United States.

1 Resolved, That in continuance of the authority con2 ferred in House Resolution 614 of the One Hundred Fifth

3 Congress adopted by the House of Representatives and de4 livered to the Senate on December 19, 1998, Mr. Hyde

5 of Illinois, Mr. Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin, Mr. McCol6 lum of Florida, Mr. Gekas of Pennsylvania, Mr. Canady

7 of Florida, Mr. Buyer of Indiana, Mr. Bryant of Ten8 nessee, Mr. Chabot of Ohio, Mr. Barr of Georgia, Mr.

9 Hutchinson of Arkansas, Mr. Cannon of Utah, Mr. Rogan

10 of California, and Mr. Graham of South Carolina are ap11 pointed managers to conduct the impeachment trial

12 against William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United
2

HRES 10 RDS

1 States, that a message be sent to the Senate to inform

2 the Senate of these appointments, and that the managers

3 so appointed may, in connection with the preparation and

4 the conduct of the trial, exhibit the articles of impeach5 ment to the Senate and take all other actions necessary,

6 which may include the following:

7 (1) Employing legal, clerical, and other nec8 essary assistants and incurring such other expenses

9 as may be necessary, to be paid from amounts avail10 able to the Committee on the Judiciary under appli11 cable expense resolutions or from the applicable ac12 counts of the House of Representatives.

13 (2) Sending for persons and papers, and filing

14 with the Secretary of the Senate, on the part of the

15 House of Representatives, any pleadings, in conjunc16 tion with or subsequent to, the exhibition of the arti17 cles of impeachment that the managers consider nec18 essary.

J. DENNIS HASTERT,

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
### [§4015. Omitted]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

As enacted, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1841(c), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4243, originally transferred section 2361 of this title to this section, to become effective Jan. 1, 2022. Subsequently, Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(u)(2)(D), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2151, amended section 1841(c) of Pub. L. 116–283, effective as if included therein, so as to eliminate that transfer, thereby omitting this section before it took effect. Another amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 resulted in the transfer of section 2361 to section 4141 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER I—HOUSING RENOVATION AND MODERNIZATION
IV

House Calendar No. 293

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 603

[Report No. 106–924]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 4578) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 4578) making appropriations

for the Department of the Interior and related agencies

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 4578) making appropriations for

4 the Department of the Interior and related agencies for
2

HRES 603 RH

1 the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other

2 purposes. All points of order against the conference report

3 and against its consideration are waived. The conference

4 report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 293

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 603

[Report No. 106–924]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4578) making

appropriations for the Department of the Interiorand related agencies for the fiscal year endingSeptember 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I,
David J. Moore, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




                                           /s/
                                           David J. Moore
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (principal executive officer)


                                           January 24, 2003
Exhibit
99.7



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Pembina Pipeline Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Scott Burrows, Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The
                                         information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
                                         financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	February
26, 2015



| | /s/ J. Scott Burrows                               
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | J. Scott Burrows                                   
| | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 44—TRUTH IN SAVINGS**

Sec.
4301.
Findings and purpose.
4302.
Disclosure of interest rates and terms of accounts.
4303.
Account schedule.
4304.
Disclosure requirements for certain accounts.
4305.
Distribution of schedules.
4306.
Payment of interest.
4307.
Periodic statements.
4308.
Regulations.
4309.
Administrative enforcement.
4310.
Repealed.
4311.
Credit unions.
4312.
Effect on State law.
4313.
Definitions.
### Reserve and Dividends of Federal Land Bank Associations
# C_2006224EN.01001102.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the House of Lords — United Kingdom) — United Utilities plc v Commissioners of Customs & Excise

(Case C-89/05) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 13B(f) - Exemption for games of chance - Scope - Activity of a call centre)

(2006/C 224/20)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

House of Lords

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: United Utilities plc

Applicant:

Defendant: Commissioners of Customs & Excise

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — House of Lords — Interpretation of Article 13B(f) of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax : uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Exemption of betting, lotteries and other forms of gambling — Applicability to supplies of services by a third company which accepts bets made by telephone on behalf of another company

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13B(f) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, must be interpreted as meaning that the provision of call centre services to a telephone bookmaking organiser, which entails the staff of the supplier of those services accepting bets on behalf of the organiser, does not constitute a betting transaction within the meaning of that provision and cannot, therefore, qualify for the exemption from VAT laid down by that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2005.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8502
CHARLIE J. PERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus C. G. WILLIAMS, JR., Sheriff, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-1563-AM) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 2, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charlie J. Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perry v. Williams , No. CA-95-1563-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED