alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006278EN.01000902.xml

| 16.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4378 — Providence/Caudwell Group)

(2006/C 278/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4378. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4378. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Dashboard

As of August 23, 2023

Subject to Revision

September 2023 October 2023

JTF-RH is currently ON PLAN to begin gravity defueling on October 16, 2023

August 2023

Key Events

October 3: Defueling Open House 

October 16: Defueling Begins

October 17: DLNR Commission on Water 

Resource Management 

October 24: DISF

1 Meeting

Next 90 Days 

Dashboard Legend

1

DISF: Defueling Information Sharing Forum

NEPA: National Environmental Policy Act

Pipeline repacking removes air and enables the 

fuel to flow uniformly during defueling. It is a 

preparatory stage of defueling and provides an 

opportunity to verify system functionality.

DOH | EPA Conditional Approval

Start Complete

253/253

For more about Repacking, click 

on the video thumbnail here:

Repacking the Pipelines 

Joint Task Force-Red Hill completed all 253 mandatory repairs, 

while also receiving all required conditional approvals from 

third-party quality validators, the Hawaii Department of Health, 

and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 

Operational Viewpoints

August 24: House Special Committee Brief 

August 28-TBD: Repacking Pipelines

August 31: NEPA1 Completed

September 1-30: Final Preparations for 

Defueling (Regulatory Approvals, Safety 

Reviews, Rehearsals, etc.)

September 19: HNL Dept of Emergency 

Management Meeting

To learn more about 

Joint Task Force-Red 

Hill operational 

viewpoints click on the 

info graphic.
19 Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation PBEE 1200 K Street, N.W.. Washington, D.C. 20005-4026 "%-IOU0 

Re: Appeal 1 Horn and Hardart Baking Company 

Automat, Cafeteria and Restaurant Employees Union 

Local 18 Pension Plan (the "Plan") 

The Appeals Board reviewed your appeal of PBGC's July 17, 

2003 determination that you are not entitled to a benefit under 

the Plan. For the reasons stated below, the Board changed PBGC's 

determination and found that you are entitled to receive a 

deferred vested benefit. PBGC will send you a new determination 

regarding the amount, form, and commencement date of your 

deferred vested benefit. 

Determination and ADD& 

In its'benefit determination letter, PBGC stated: "Your plan 

provided retirement benefits to participants at age 65 with 15 

years of service and early retirement benefits at age 55 with 15 

years of service. Since you terminated your employment in 1974 

at age 37 with approximately 19 years of service, you were never 

a plan participant." 

In your July 29, 2003 appeal, you stated that during your 

19 years of service you were never advised that you would not be 

granted a pension if you were under age 55 at the time your 

employment terminated. 

Discussion 

In its original actuarial valuation of the Plan, PBGC 

determined that an Employee became entitled to a deferred vested 

benefit after completing 15 years of service. In reviewing your 

case, however, PBGC analysts determined that you were not 

entitled to a deferred vested benefit, because you terminated 

employment in 1974, which was prior to the date, October 1, 

1976, when the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") 
would have required the Plan to adopt one of several minimum 

deferred vesting schedules. 

The Board, however, noted that PBGC's original actuarial 

valuation was based on an analysis of the terms of the Plan 

document and that this analysis did not.depend on whether or not 

an Employee worked through October 1, 1976. In addition, the 

Board found that the conclusions drawn in PBGC's actuarial 

valuation represented a reasonable interpretation of the Plan 

document. Moreover, the Board noted that the conclusions reached 

in PBGC's actuarial valuation were implemented in the case of 

numerous Plan participants who terminated employment prior to 

October 1, 1976. Thus, the Board concluded that you should be 

treated in the same way that PBGC treated other similarlysituated participants. 

Decision 

The Board changed PBGC's determination and found that you 

are entitled to a receive a deferred vested benefit. This is the 

agency's final decision with respect to your eligibility for a 

benefit under the Plan. PBGC will send you a new determination 

regarding the amount, form, and commencement date of your 

benefit, and this determination will provide a new right of 

appeal. If you need other information from PBGC, please call the 

Customer Contact Center at 1-800-400-7242. 

Sincerely, 

Michel Louis 

Acting Chair, Appeals Board
# C_2006316EN.01000101.xml

| 22.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 December 2006

(2006/C 316/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3178 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4545 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67160 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9661 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6032 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,57 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1330 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5781 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,525 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6977 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8040 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3759 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,69 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,585 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8836 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6785 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5155 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2456 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8946 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0303 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 222,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2280 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3012 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3594 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 952,45 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6591 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,928 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6730 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,159 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3178

JPY

Japanese yen

155,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4545

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67160

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9661

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6032

ISK

Iceland króna

91,57

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1330

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5781

CZK

Czech koruna

27,525

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6977

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8040

RON

Romanian leu

3,3759

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,69

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,585

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8836

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6785

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5155

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2456

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8946

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0303

KRW

South Korean won

1 222,26

ZAR

South African rand

9,2280

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3012

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3594

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 952,45

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6591

PHP

Philippine peso

64,928

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6730

THB

Thai baht

48,159

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 87.3 Time limits. ( a ) The Secretary shall cause to begin as early as possible the necessary research to determine the identity of the ultimate or present day beneficiaries of judgments. Such research shall be done under the direction of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs. The affected tribes or groups shall be encouraged to submit pertinent data. All pertinent data, including cultural, political and historical material, and records, including membership, census and other rolls shall be considered. If more than one entity is determined to be eligible to participate in the use or distribution of the funds, the results of the research shall include a proposed formula for the division or apportionment of the judgment funds among or between the involved entities.
( b ) The results of all research shall be provided to the governing bodies of all affected tribes and groups. The Area Director shall assist the affected tribe or group in arranging for preliminary sessions or meetings of the tribal governing body, or public meetings. The Area Director shall make a presentation of the results of the research and shall arrange for expertise of the Bureau of Indian Affairs to be available at these meetings to assist the tribe or group in developing a use or distribution proposal, bearing in mind that under the Act not less than twenty (20) per centum of the judgment funds, including investment income thereon, is to be used for tribal programs unless the Secretary determines that the particular circumstances of the affected Indian tribe clearly warrant otherwise.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-32 

December 31, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4044 Allocation of Assets 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter dated November 19, 1975. You expressed concern that under the proposed

allocation of assets regulation (6 CFR proposed part 2608), the pensions of retired participants which you state are fully

guaranteed under your plan would be subject to reduction. 

From the information contained in your letter and the copy of a portion of your plan enclosed therewith, it appears

that upon retirement a participant is given a certificate from the insurance carrier with which the plan is maintained which

evidences his right to a pension. It further appears, based on the provisions of section 17.2 of the Plan, that in the event

of termination the obligation to provide the pension is not an obligation of the employer, and furthermore, that the

pension of the retiree is not affected by termination of the plan. You state in your letter that, in effect, the pension of the

retired participant is guaranteed by the insurance company, but that the assets necessary to fund the pension remain assets

of the plan for several actuarial computations. 

Generally, where a plan purchases an annuity for a retiree, retains no further interest, either legal [*2] or equitable,

in the annuity and transfers plan assets to the insurance company to purchase the pension, those assets are no longer

considered plan assets for purposes of the allocation of assets required under § 4044 of the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974. (the "Act"). (But see, Act § 4045 providing for the recapture of certain distributions from a plan

within 3 years of its termination.) However, where the assets necessary to fund the annuity are retained by the plan, they

remain assets of the plan, and, accordingly, are subject to the Act's § 4044 allocation procedure. (Act, § 4044(a).)

Whether in that case the annuities of the participants would be jeopardized depends upon the provisions of the plan and

the provisions of the contract with the insurance carrier. 

 I trust this is responsive to your inquiry. I enjoyed meeting you, and please let me know if we can be of further

assistance. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
JUL 2 2.2004 

Re: be Grand Union Company Aswciates' 

. Retirement Plan ("Plan"), PBGC Case #I94132 

The Appeals Board has reviewed your appeal of PBGC's September 26, 2003 

determination that you are entitled to a monthly benefit of $312.18 as a Straight Life Annuity with 

no survivor benefits if payments start on August 1, 2019 (at age 65). With its determination 

letter, PBGC provided a benefit statement showing that it calculated your benefit using 13 years 

and 7 months of credited (or benefit) service. As discussed below, the Appeals Board changed 

the determination by finding that you earned 19 years and 3 months of credited servrce. PBGC's 

Insurance Operations Department, the organization responsible for determining and paying 

benefits, will send you a new determination. 

Your appeal said that you believe you should have 19.537 years of credited service 

because: (1) you met the Plan's age 20 ih years requirement on January 24, 1975, and thus you 

were eligible to participate in the Plan on January 1, 1976; and (2) you worked full-time (never 

part-time) at a rate of 1,500 or more hours per year, without any breaks in service. You also noted 

that you were informed by Carolyn Burton, the Personnel Manager at the Waterford Distribution 

Center, where you worked, that the Company mistakenly forgot to enroll you in the Plan until 

January 1, 1983, but had corrected the erroneous date. To support your claim, you provided a 

copy of an excerpt from the Plan that states the requirements for Plan participation and a letter you 

received from the Company that shows you are entitled to a Straight Life Annuity of $364.97 per 

month beginning at age 65'and $145.99 per month if your payments start at age 55. 

The files show you were born on and employed with the Company from 

August 3, 1973 through July 15, 1995. Prior to April 1, 1976, the Plan recognized only full-time 

employment afier age 30 as credited service. Thus, under the terms of the Plan in effect when 

you were hired, you could not start accruing credited service until August 1, 1984, the first of the 

month after you turned age 30. However, the Plan was amended effective April 1, 1976 to allow 

employees who had met the Plan's age and service requirements to start accruing credited service 

beginning as of that date. 
LO 

Sl under the terms of the Plan, you receive one month of-credited service each month from 

(11 April 1976 through July 1995. Therefore, you eamed 19 years and 3 months (19.25 years).of 11 credited service. 

3 

We will forward a copy of this letter to PBGC's Insurance Operations ~epartment, who 

will send you a new determiniation. Meanwhile, if you have questions or need additional 

information, please call PBGC's Customer Contact Center at 1-800-400-7242. 

Sincerely, 

Sherline M. Brickus " 

Member, Appeals Board
### §1131c. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section, acts June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title I, §6, 48 Stat. 259; Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §11, 67 Stat. 395; July 26, 1956, ch. 741, title I, §105(e), 70 Stat. 665; Oct. 17, 1968, Pub. L. 90–582, §2(a), 82 Stat. 1145, covered purchase of stock of production credit associations and payment, retirement, and cancellation of stock. See section 2094 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Barry W. Tackett
Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer

Date: November 21, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### §7417. Military history fellowships

(a) Fellowships.—The Secretary of the Army shall prescribe regulations under which the Secretary may award fellowships in military history of the Army to the persons described in subsection (b).

(b) Eligible Persons.—The persons eligible for awards of fellowships under this section are citizens and nationals of the United States who—

(1) are graduate students in United States military history;

(2) have completed all requirements for a doctoral degree other than preparation of a dissertation; and

(3) agree to prepare a dissertation in a subject area of military history determined by the Secretary.

(c) Regulations.—The regulations prescribed under this section shall include—

(1) the criteria for award of fellowships;

(2) the procedures for selecting recipients;

(3) the basis for determining the amount of a fellowship; and

(4) the total amount that may be awarded as fellowships during an academic year.

(Added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1076(a), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2511, §4316; renumbered §4317, Pub. L. 103–35, title II, §201(b)(2)(A), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 98; renumbered §7417, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4317 of this title as this section.

1993—Pub. L. 103–35 renumbered section 4316 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, **

**As      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of      2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                David Liu                        |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
| David                Liu                            |
| Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |

----
Exhibit 10.7.1


 


AMENDMENT
TO THE MARIMED INC. 2018 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN


(this
“Amendment”)


Effective
Date: September 23, 2021


 


A.       Article
III, Section 3.1 of the MariMed Inc. 2018 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:


 


3.1
Common Stock Authorized. Subject to the provisions of this Article and Article XI, the total aggregate number of shares of Common
Stock that may be delivered pursuant to Awards shall not exceed 70 million shares. Each share delivered in connection with a Full-Value
Award, and each share delivered or deemed to be delivered in connection with Stock Options or other non-Full-Value Awards, shall be counted
against this limit as one share in accordance with Section 3.2.


 


B.       The
foregoing amendment to the Plan has been approved and adopted by the Board and approved by the Company’s stockholders in accordance
with the Company’s bylaws and applicable law.


 


C.       Except
as otherwise set forth in this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as when originally
adopted or as previously amended.


 


D.       Capitalized
terms used in this amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan.
#### § 20.511 Should permanency plans be developed?

Permanency planning must be developed for all child placements within 6 months after initial placement of the child. Every reasonable effort will be made to preserve the family and/or reunify the children with the family and relatives when developing permanency plans. However, the child's health and safety are the paramount concern.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 47

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that the

expenses of special-order speeches be paid from the Members Representational Allowance of the Members making such speeches.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Ms. RIVERS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require that the expenses of special-order speeches be

paid from the Members Representational Allowance of

the Members making such speeches.

1 Resolved, That (a) rule XVII of the Rules of the

2 House of Representatives is amended by adding at the end

3 the following new clause:

4 ‘‘10. Expenses of any special-order speech shall be

5 paid from the Members Representational Allowance of the

6 Member making such speech.’’.
2

•HRES 47 IH

1 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take

2 effect on the first day beginning after the date of adoption

3 of this resolution.

Æ