alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD

SUBJECT: Meeting with State-EPA Roundtable

DATE: Tuesday, June 17, 2014

TIME: Noon – 1:00 PM

Participants:

EPA – Sara Hisel-McCoy, Grace Robiou, Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan, Janita Aguirre, Christina

Christensen, Heather Goss, Gary Russo, Rosaura Conde, Ruth Chemerys, Ellen Weitzler, Wayne

Jackson, Cheryl Atkinson, Lisa Perras-Gordon, David Pfeifer, Russell Nelson, Ann Lavaty,

Phillip Woods, William Beckwith

ACWA/States – Melissa McCoy (ACWA), Gerry Szal (Massachusetts), Scott Stoner (New

York), Alex Barron (Virginia), Connie Brower (North Carolina), Martha Clark Mettler (Indiana),

Jason Childress (Oklahoma), Tom Stiles (Kansas), Sarah Johnson (Colorado), Lindsay Patterson

(Wyoming), Nancy Sonafrank (Alaska)

Summary of Meeting: Participants discussed the status of the Water Quality Standards

Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking. Last regularly scheduled meeting of the State-EPA

Roundtable.

Agenda

TOPIC TIME LEAD__________

1. Roll Call 10 min Aguirre

2. Status of Rulemaking 30 min Hisel-McCoy

3. Questions & Answers 20 min Roundtable
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Apelaciones 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Apelaciones

                          - Su Derecho de Apelar
                          - Junta de Apelaciones
                          - Decisiones de la Junta de Apelaciones   
                          - Cómo Apelar Determinaciones Formales
                          - Formularios para Apelar Determinaciones de Beneficios

September 14, 2020
# C_2006294EN.01003701.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/37

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-47/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/70)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.03.2006.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4464]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 11193]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Sequoia National Forest; California; Piute Mountains Travel 
Management Plan; Correction

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement; 
Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service published a document in the Federal 
Register on February 18, 2011, concerning a notice of intent to prepare 
an environmental impact statement for the Piute Mountains Travel 
Management Plan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Warren L. Niemi, 559-784-1500, 
extension 1137.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 18, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-3698, 
on page 9539, in the third column, delete item No. 12.

    Dated: February 23, 2011.
Debra L. Whitman,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-4464 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 23, 2012

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY RAY MURRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA; CERTAIN MEMBERS

OF THE U.S. SENATE; CERTAIN

MEMBERS OF THE U.S. HOUSE;

THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE

OF OKLAHOMA,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-6147

(D.C. No. 5:12-CV-00542-R)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, TYMKOVICH, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.**

Timothy Ray Murray, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint as frivolous. He filed this action seeking damages and

injunctive relief against the United States, several members of the U.S. House and

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th

Cir. R. 32.1.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Senate, and the Governor of Oklahoma. He alleges various conspiracies by the

government against himself. This court his jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1291, and we affirm.

Mr. Murray alleges various government conspiracies, including the use of

satellites to damage his reproductive system, the broadcast of his life on radio and

television, and an alleged cover-up about the assassination of John F. Kennedy. 

He alleges violations of his rights “under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh,

Eighth, Ninth, Tenth and Fourteenth Amendments;” the district court reviewed his

complaint based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a), 1915(e)(2)(B) and dismissed it as

frivolous. See Murray v. United States, No. CIV-12-542-R, ECF No. 14 (W.D.

Okla. June 6, 2012). 

We review a district court’s dismissal of a complaint for frivolousness for

an abuse of discretion. See Milligan v. Archuleta, 659 F.3d 1294, 1296 (10th Cir.

2011). After reviewing Mr. Murray’s claims, we agree with the district court that

they seem to fall in the delusional category or involve claims that would be barred

by sovereign immunity or the Eleventh Amendment. See Neitzke v. Williams,

490 U.S. 319, 325, 328 (1989).

AFFIRMED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge

- 2 -
§ 170.514 Who reviews bridge inspection reports? The person responsible for the bridge inspection team must send a copy of the inspection report to BIADOT. BIADOT: ( a ) Reviews the report for quality assurance and works with FHWA to ensure the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 144 are carried out; and
( b ) Furnishes a copy of the report to the BIA Regional Office, which will forward the copy to the affected Tribe.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-74 

October 24, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4062(e). Liability of Employer in Single Employer Plans. Closing of Facility Affecting More Than 20% of Plan

Participants 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter dated September 23, 1975, requesting that the Pension Benefit Guaranty

Corporation (the "PBGC") not close the pre-enactment termination case concerning the * * * Salaried Employees Pension

Plan. 

Regarding your contention that the provisions of § 4062(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

1974 (the "Act") should be interpreted to apply to a notification to participants of their pending separation from

employment as distinguished from their actual separation, we do not agree. Section 4062(e) of the Act is clear that it

refers to participants who "are separated from employment." Therefore, we intend to close this case. 

If, however, the outcome of the current litigation between * * * and the State of Minnesota produces a result which

would warrant the PBGC reopening this matter, we will entertain a request to do so within a reasonable period of time

following the conclusion of that litigation. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### [§2431b. Renumbered §4212]
### §7724. Executive Director

(a) Appointment and Qualifications.—(1) There shall be an Executive Director of the Army National Military Cemeteries who shall meet such professional qualifications as may be established by the Secretary of the Army.

(2) The Executive Director reports directly to the Secretary.

(b) Responsibilities.—The Executive Director is responsible for the following:

(1) Exercising authority, direction and control over all aspects of the Cemeteries.

(2) Establishing and maintaining full accountability for all gravesites and inurnment niches in the Cemeteries.

(3) Oversight of the construction, operation and maintenance, and repair of the buildings, structures, and utilities of the Cemeteries.

(4) Acquisition and maintenance of real property and interests in real property for the Cemeteries.

(5) Planning and conducting private ceremonies at the Cemeteries, including funeral and memorial services for interment and inurnment, and planning and conducting public ceremonies, as directed by the Secretary of the Army.

(6) Formulating, promulgating, administering, and overseeing policies and addressing proposals for the placement of memorials and monuments in the Cemeteries.

(7) Formulating and implementing a master plan for Arlington National Cemetery that, at a minimum, addresses interment and inurnment capacity, visitor accommodation, operation and maintenance, capital requirements, preservation of the cemetery's special features, and other matters the Executive Director considers appropriate.

(8) Overseeing the programming, planning, budgeting, and execution of funds authorized and appropriated for the Cemeteries.

(9) Providing recommendations regarding any request for an exception to interment and inurnment eligibility policy.

(10) Supervising the superintendents of the Cemeteries.

(Added Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title V, §591(a)(1), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1440, §4724; renumbered §7724, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7724 was renumbered section 8894 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4724 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of June 30, 2000 and the related statements of operations for the six
month period ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,606
<SECURITIES>                                   108,023
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,116)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,621
<PP&E>                                           3,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,481)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,918
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,967
<SALES>                                         20,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,542
<CGS>                                            8,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,717)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,074)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,074)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,074)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-2 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 29, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K/A of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-2 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K/A.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   November 15, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 600246

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.


### DAVID C. HARRIS Hospitalman Apprentice (E

- 2 ), United States Navy Appellant

____________________

_____ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Paul C. LeBlanc , JAGC, USN

. For Appellant : Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 29 Septem ber 2016

_________________________ Before CAMPBELL

, RUGH and ELLINGTON

, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved b y the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
#### William Nagle, Respondent, v. William Rosenstein, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ.; concurred.
Exhibit 10.2

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
    November 19, 2021

    

    

    PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Dear John Hanson:

    

    

    Turtle Beach Corporation (the “Company”) is pleased to offer you participation in the Turtle Beach Corporation Retention Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Plan”)
      as an Extended Participant.  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall be defined as set forth in the Plan.

    

    

    As a participant in the Plan, you may be eligible for enhanced benefits relating to severance payments if the Company has a Change in Control.  Your right to the
      enhanced benefits provided for under the Plan is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.  As set forth in the Plan, the Company may, at its sole discretion, amend or terminate the Plan and any payments or benefits provided under the Plan at
      any time prior to a Change in Control.

    

    

    The terms of the Plan and your participation in the Plan are strictly confidential matters.  You shall not disclose any information concerning such matters to any
      person except you attorney, your accountant and your immediate family.

    

    

    Please acknowledge your participation in the Plan and your agreement to the terms and conditions of the Plan by signing this letter.  Please keep this letter with your
      copy of the Plan for your records.  If you have any questions about the Plan, please do not hesitate to contact me.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    	

          	
            Very truly yours,

                

            

            /s/ Juergen Stark

            

            

            By: Juergen Stark, CEO	

          


    

    

    

    

    

    

    ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:

    

    

    /s/ John Hanson

    Date:  November 19, 2021
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 14513

Unemployed

Number in thousands

16 years and over

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU03000000Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Unemployment Level

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:06:38 PM)
Order entered February 4 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00012
- CV
CITY OF DALLAS , Appellant

V. MARCO ANTONIO MONROY , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 20
- 05452
- D

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s February 2, 2022 motion for an extension of time to file its brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to February 28, 2 022

.
/s/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
#### § 533.7 Void agreements.

Management contracts and changes in persons with a financial interest in or management responsibility for a management contract, that have not been approved by the Chairman in accordance with the requirements of part 531 of this chapter and this part, are void.

[74 FR 36936, July 27, 2009]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JUDY MCGRATH A/K/A JO ANN 

FONZONE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 103 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.