alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 610

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 5, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2941) to establish the Las Cienegas National

Conservation Area in the State of Arizona. The first reading

of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against

consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be

confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Resources. After general debate

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the

Committee on Resources now printed in the bill, it shall be

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record

and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII. That
2

•HRES 610 EH

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered

as read. All points of order against that amendment in the

nature of a substitute are waived. During consideration of the

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 610 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 41 (Friday, March 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 13876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04879]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Content Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States is in the process of reviewing its content policy. A 
list of the questions and issues that the Bank is addressing can be 
accessed here: http://www.exim.gov/generalbankpolicies/content/2013-Content-Review.cfm.
    The Bank is soliciting public comment on these questions and 
issues. Interested parties may submit comments on this document by 
email to content.review@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue NW., 
Room 451, Washington, DC 20571, within 21 calendar days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Angela Mariana Freyre,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-04879 Filed 2-27-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
§ 533.3 Submission of management contract for approval. A tribe shall include in any request for approval of a management contract under this part: ( a ) A contract containing: ( 1 ) Original signatures of an authorized official of the tribe and the management contractor and;
( 2 ) A representation that the contract as submitted to the Chairman is the entirety of the agreement among the parties.
( b ) A letter, signed by the tribal chairman, setting out the authority of an authorized tribal official to act for the tribe concerning the management contract.
( c ) Copies of documents evidencing the authority under paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) A list of all persons and entities identified in §§ 537.1(a) and 537.1(c)(1) of this chapter, and either: ( 1 ) The information required under § 537.1(b)(1) of this chapter for class II gaming contracts and § 537.1(b)(1)(i) of this chapter for class III gaming contracts; or
( 2 ) The dates on which the information was previously submitted.
( e ) ( 1 ) For new contracts and new operations, a three (3)-year business plan which sets forth the parties' goals, objectives, budgets, financial plans, and related matters; or
( 2 ) For new contracts for existing operations, a three
( 3 ) -year business plan which sets forth the parties' goals, objectives, budgets, financial plans, and related matters, and income statements and sources and uses of funds statements for the previous three (3) years.
( f ) If applicable, a justification, consistent with the provisions of § 531.1(h) of this chapter, for a term limit in excess of five (5) years, but not exceeding seven (7) years.
( g ) If applicable, a justification, consistent with the provisions of § 531.1(i) of this chapter, for a fee in excess of thirty (30) percent, but not exceeding forty (40) percent.
( h ) A legal description for the site on which the gaming operation to be managed is, or will be, located.
[74 FR 36935, July 27, 2009, as amended at 80 FR 31994, June 5, 2015]
Summary of Named Executive Officer Annualized Salary



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary of Horace Mann Educators Corporation 
 Named Executive Officer Annualized Salary

 The table below summarizes the annualized salaries of Horace Mann Educators Corporation’s (the “Company”) Chief
Executive Officer and the other four highest compensated Executive Officers, as defined in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, (collectively the “Named Executive Officers”), except that Frank
D’Ambra III is not listed following his departure from the Company. These salaries may be changed at any time at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and/or Board of Directors of the Company. These salaries do not include short-term and
long-term incentive compensation amounts, the Company’s contributions to defined contribution plans and the Company’s contributions to other employee benefit programs on behalf of the Named Executive Officers. 
  

				
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	Annualized
Salary
	 Louis G. Lower II
President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	640,008.00
	 Peter H. Heckman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	410,000.00
	 Douglas W. Reynolds
Executive Vice President – Insurance Operations
	  	$	400,000.00
	 Paul D. Andrews
Senior Vice President – Corporate Services
	  	$	228,000.00

 Last revision date: May 21, 2008
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 65

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1999

Mr. STUMP (for himself and Mr. EVANS) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Veterans’ Affairs in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Veterans’ Af4 fairs (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries,

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $5,220,900 for the One Hundred

9 Sixth Congress.
2

•HRES 65 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $2,497,291 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1999, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 2000; and

7 (2) not more than $2,723,609 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 2000, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 2001.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
### Part B—National Banks for Cooperatives

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(12), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4680, struck out "United and" before "National" in part heading.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
April 12, 2012 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2012-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the
closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from April 12, 2012 through December 31, 2012, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                 |  | 
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 26, 2013
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
,g3/9D BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

Docket OST-02- /A 877- 2 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunity is subject, 

where applicable, to conditions previously imposed. 

This action is effective after 4 clays unless a petition tiled w&r 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is mdcrtakm on the Deparhmm.0 own moth. 

In view ofthe agrement’s noncontroversial natlln and the availability of the 

&vc procedure, the 2l-day period in 14 CFR303.42 k waived 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to: 

David M. O’Connor 

Director, Government & Industry Affairs - United States 

International Air Transport Association 

1776 K St. N.W. Suite 400 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

(202) 293-9292
### [§2361. Renumbered §4141]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2361 was renumbered section 2351 of this title.
H. Res. 678

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

December 15, 2000.

Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and Manual

of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Seventh Congress be printed as a House document, and that

three thousand additional copies shall be printed and bound

for the use of the House of Representatives, of which nine

hundred copies shall be bound in leather with thumb index

and delivered as may be directed by the Parliamentarian of

the House.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2006326EN.01003402.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/34

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Würzburg (Germany) lodged on 24 October 2006 — Otmar Greser v Bundesagentur für Arbeit

(Case C-438/06)

(2006/C 326/72)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Sozialgericht Würzburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Otmar Greser

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesagentur für Arbeit

Defendant:

Question referred

The preliminary issue in the present case is how Article 71(1)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) is to be interpreted. Under that provision, must a worker return to his place of residence or is it sufficient that he returns to another place in the Member State once a week?

1

---

(1)  OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416.

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  2024 ERISA Section 4050 (Missing Participants) Mortality ... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# 2024 ERISA Section 4050 (Missing Participants) Mortality Table

This mortality table is used as part of the "missing participant annuity assumptions" as discussed in 29 CFR 4050. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

December 6, 2023

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
# C_2013306EN.01000301.xml

| 22.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2013/C 306/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 11.9.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37175 (13/N) |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | Deutschland | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Richtlinie zur Förderung von Maßnahmen zur Information von Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern über ökologischen Landbau und dessen Erzeugnisse sowie zur Förderung damit verbundener Absatzförderungsmaßnahmen |
| Legal basis | Bundeshaushaltsordnung (BHO) (§§ 23, 44, 91, 100), Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschriften zu § 23, 44 BHO, Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz/VwVfG) (§§ 48 bis 49 a), Richtlinie zur Förderung von Maßnahmen zur Information von Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern über ökologischen Landbau und dessen Erzeugnisse sowie zur Förderung damit verbundener Absatzförderungsmaßnahmen |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Encouraging quality products, Sectoral development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 2,50 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

11.9.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37175 (13/N)

Member State

Germany

Region

Deutschland

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Richtlinie zur Förderung von Maßnahmen zur Information von Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern über ökologischen Landbau und dessen Erzeugnisse sowie zur Förderung damit verbundener Absatzförderungsmaßnahmen

Legal basis

Bundeshaushaltsordnung (BHO) (§§ 23, 44, 91, 100), Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschriften zu § 23, 44 BHO, Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz/VwVfG) (§§ 48 bis 49 a), Richtlinie zur Förderung von Maßnahmen zur Information von Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern über ökologischen Landbau und dessen Erzeugnisse sowie zur Förderung damit verbundener Absatzförderungsmaßnahmen

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Encouraging quality products, Sectoral development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 2,50 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 2 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 2 million

Intensity

50 %

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2014

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

| Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE) |
| --- |
| Deichmanns Aue 29 |
| 53168 Bonn |
| DEUTSCHLAND |

Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE)

Deichmanns Aue 29

53168 Bonn

DEUTSCHLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Remanded and Opinion Filed January 2, 2015. 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01293-CV 

USA EROSION, INC., Appellant 

V. 

W.W. CONSTRUCTION WATERING SERVICE, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09061 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Before the Court is appellant’s December 22, 2014, joint motion to render judgment. 

USA Erosion appealed the July 14, 2014 final judgment in favor of W.W. Construction Watering 

Service, L.L.C. Webber, L.L.C. d/b/a W.W. Webber L.L.C., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 

and American Home Assurance Company did not appeal and are not before this Court. In the 

motion, the parties state they have reached a settlement and request we set aside the portion of 

the trial court’s judgment adjudicating all claims against each other, without regard to the merits, 

and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with their 

agreement. We grant the motion and set aside the portion of the trial court’s judgment 

adjudicating all claims between appellant and appellee, without regard to the merits, and remand 
 –2– 

the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with their agreement. TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). 

141293F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

USA EROSION, INC., Appellant 

No. 05-14-01293-CV V. 

W.W. CONSTRUCTION WATERING 

SERVICE, LLC, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09061. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is set 

aside without regard to the merits and we REMAND the case to the trial court for rendition of 

judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. 

Judgment entered January 2, 2015.
### §1171. Priority claims

(a) There shall be paid as an administrative expense any claim of an individual or of the personal representative of a deceased individual against the debtor or the estate, for personal injury to or death of such individual arising out of the operation of the debtor or the estate, whether such claim arose before or after the commencement of the case.

(b) Any unsecured claim against the debtor that would have been entitled to priority if a receiver in equity of the property of the debtor had been appointed by a Federal court on the date of the order for relief under this title shall be entitled to the same priority in the case under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2643; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §522, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 388.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

Section 1171 of the House amendment is derived from section 1170 of the House bill in lieu of section 1173(a)(9) of the Senate amendment.

#### house report no. 95–595

[Section 1170] This section [enacted as section 1171] is derived from current law. Subsection (a) grants an administrative expense priority to the claim of any individual (or of the personal representative of a deceased individual) against the debtor or the estate for personal injury to or death of the individual arising out of the operation of the debtor railroad or the estate, whether the claim arose before or after commencement of the case. The priority under current law, found in section 77(n) [section 205(n) of former title 11], applies only to employees of the debtor. This subsection expands the protection provided.

Subsection (b) follows present section 77(b) of the Bankruptcy Act [section 205(b) of former title 11] by giving priority to any unsecured claims that would be entitled to priority if a receiver in equity of the property of the debtor had been appointed by a Federal court on the date of the order for relief under the bankruptcy laws. As under current law, the courts will determine the precise contours of the priority recognized by this subsection in each case.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–353 substituted "the same" for "such".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.