alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-59: OTS No. H-4761]

                    Notice is hereby given that on February 11, 2011, the Office of Thrift Supervision approved the application of Franklin Financial Corporation MHC and Franklin Federal Savings Bank, Glen Allen, Virginia, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail                     *Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Southeast Regional Office, 1475 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309.                

Dated: February 11, 2011.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2011-3656 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
### §§1181, 1182. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–230, §24, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 466

Sections, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title II, §203(b), (c), 42 Stat. 1464, related to liability of United States for debentures and other obligations issued by credit corporations and additional real-estate security for obligations, respectively.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer for
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated April 10, 2013, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Property L.P., Brookfield Global Management
Limited and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
(i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Dated: April 30, 2013



/s/ Richard B. ClarkRichard B. Clark Chief
Executive Officer of one of its managers, Brookfield Property Partners LLC
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 7, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00468-CV

ANCHOR DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC, Appellant

V.

LUIS GARCIA DE LOS SALMONES AND MARIA GARCIA DE LOS 

SALMONES, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1124642

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 10, 2019. No clerk’s record has 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed 

the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On, April 7, 2020, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 
2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Wise and Zimmerer.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-22 

January 13, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022(b)(1). Benefits Guaranteed. Five Year Phase-in of Guarantee 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter dated December 6, 1974. In that letter you stated that you have been interpreting

Section 4022(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") as making "full coverage"

applicable to plan participants only if premiums have been paid to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for five

years. In our view, payment of premiums for five years is a condition upon the payment of benefits only under the

Contingent Liability Coverage provisions of Section 4023(a) of the Act. See id Subsection (d). The five-year "phase-in"

rule applies to plans which have been in existence less than five years or to amendments which have become effective

or were made within the five years prior to the termination of a plan. 

I trust this answers your inquiry. 

George B. Driesen 

Deputy General Counsel
§ 39.215 Can a school receive funding for any part-time students? ( a ) A school can receive funding for the following part-time students: ( 1 ) Kindergarten students enrolled in a 2-hour program; and
( 2 ) Grade 7-12 students enrolled in at least half but less than a full instructional day.
( b ) The school must count students classified as part-time at 50 percent of their basic instructional WSU value.
EX-35.2
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

WF-RBS commercial Mortgage Trust
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2012-C6


March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard  Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
§ 584.14 When will the Commission issue its final decision? ( a ) The Commission shall issue its final decision within 90 days after the date of the recommended decision or within 90 days after the date when objections to the recommended decision are filed or within 90 days after the conclusion of briefing by the parties, whichever comes later, unless the recommended decision is to dissolve or make permanent a temporary closure order issued under § 573.4 of this chapter, in which case the Commission shall issue its decision within 30 days of the recommended decision.
( b ) The Commission shall serve its final decision upon the parties.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          78,489
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,638
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    232,999
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          12,398
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            12,357
<LOANS>                                      2,028,615
<ALLOWANCE>                                     19,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,430,524
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,746,962
<SHORT-TERM>                                    33,781
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,551
<LONG-TERM>                                    346,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           268
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,430,524
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                107,893
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,704
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   300
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               120,897
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              45,667
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,749
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           59,148
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   4
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 36,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,008
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      27,008
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,522
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.66
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,172
<LOANS-PAST>                                       668
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                16,828
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,259
<RECOVERIES>                                       297
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               19,366
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            19,366
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            181


</TABLE>
### §2241b. Prohibition on contracts providing payments for activities at sporting events to honor members of the armed forces

(a) Prohibition.—The Department of Defense may not enter into any contract or other agreement under which payments are to be made in exchange for activities by the contractor intended to honor, or giving the appearance of honoring, members of the armed forces (whether members of the regular components or the reserve components) at any form of sporting event.

(b) Construction.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as prohibiting the Department of Defense from taking actions to facilitate activities intended to honor members of the armed forces at sporting events that are provided on a pro bono basis or otherwise funded with non-Federal funds if such activities are provided and received in accordance with applicable rules and regulations regarding the acceptance of gifts by the military departments, the armed forces, and members of the armed forces.

(Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title III, §341(a), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 792.)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 605 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 605

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that communities 
 should implement the Amber Plan to expedite the recovery of abducted 
                               children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2000

Mrs. Wilson (for herself, Mr. Lampson, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Frost, 
   Mr. Oxley, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Foley, Mr. 
Greenwood, and Mr. Visclosky) submitted the following resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that communities 
 should implement the Amber Plan to expedite the recovery of abducted 
                               children.

Whereas communities should implement an emergency alert plan such as the Amber 
        Plan to expedite the recovery of abducted children;
Whereas the Amber Plan, a partnership between law enforcement agencies and media 
        officials, assists law enforcement, parents, and local communities to 
        respond immediately to the most serious child abduction cases;
Whereas the Amber Plan was created in 1996 in memory of 9-year-old Amber 
        Hagerman who was kidnapped and murdered in Arlington, Texas;
Whereas in response to community concern, the Association of Radio Managers with 
        the assistance of area law enforcement in Arlington, Texas, created the 
        Amber Plan;
Whereas, to date, the Amber Plan is credited with saving the lives of at least 9 
        children nationwide;
Whereas the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children endorses the 
        Amber Plan and is promoting the use of such emergency alert plans 
        nationwide;
Whereas the Amber Plan is responsible for reuniting children with their 
        searching parents: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
Amber Plan is a powerful tool in fighting child abductions and should 
be used across the United States.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Paul E. Martin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofRenaissance Media Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana)LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and Renaissance MediaCapital Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) [Reserved]; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 12, 2004    /s/ Paul E. Martin  Paul E. Martin  Interim Co-Chief Financial Officer  (Co-Principal Financial Officer)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-10813

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:15-cr-00250-LSC-SGC-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

SHAKADERIUS ARCHIE TONEY, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

(February 9, 2017)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 16-10813 Date Filed: 02/09/2017 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Shakaderius Toney appeals his sentence of imprisonment for 37 months, 

after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1). Toney argues that his sentence at the high end of the advisory 

guideline range is unreasonable. He contends that the district court abused its 

discretion by focusing almost exclusively on his criminal history and by not 

considering the mitigating factors he presented at sentencing. We affirm.

We review the reasonableness of a sentence under a deferential standard for 

abuse of discretion. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion. The record establishes that the 

district court listened to Toney’s arguments at sentencing about the mitigating 

factors in his history and characteristics, but determined that his request for a

sentence of 30 months’ imprisonment, the low-end of the advisory guideline range, 

was too lenient. Although the district court mentioned that Toney’s criminal 

history was “horrendous for a short period of time,” the district court also 

considered Toney’s history and characteristics, the nature of his offense, the need 

for deterrence, and the protection of the public. The district court did not rely on a 

single factor to the detriment of others, give weight to an irrelevant factor, or make 

a clear error of judgment when it gave greater weight to Toney’s criminal history. 

Toney’s 37-month sentence is well below the statutory maximum penalty of 120 

Case: 16-10813 Date Filed: 02/09/2017 Page: 2 of 3 
3

months of imprisonment and is only 7 months longer than the sentence that he 

requested.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-10813 Date Filed: 02/09/2017 Page: 3 of 3
# C_2006244EN.01002701.xml

| 11.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/27

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4358 — REOF/Borletti/Printemps)

(2006/C 244/15)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4358. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4358. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
Exhibit 99.7
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Crescent Point Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2015 and amended on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory T. Tisdale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
  
  Dated:           May 7, 2015                                                                    CRESCENT POINT ENERGY CORP.
 
  /s/ Gregory T. Tisdale
 Name:  Gregory T. Tisdale
 Title:    Chief Financial Officer
### Penalty Provisions
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001
#### SHOOK v. SHOOK

No. 473P89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 578

Appeal by plaintiff dismissed 18 January 1990. Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990.