alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, who is carrying out the
functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to an Amended
and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated March 3, 2015, as amended, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership,
Brookfield Property L.P., and certain other parties thereto, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual
Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.



Dated: March 16, 2015



| |  | /s/ John Stinebaugh                                   
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | John Stinebaugh                                       
| |  | Chief Financial Officer, Brookfield Property Group LLC
#### § 115.600 If BIA decides to restrict your IIM account under § 115.102 or § 115.104, what procedures must the BIA follow?

If under § 115.102 or § 115.104, the BIA has decided to limit your access to your IIM account (*i.e.,* decided to supervise the IIM account), or if the BIA has decided to pay creditors with funds from your IIM account, including creditors with judgments from Courts of Indian Offenses for which preliminary procedures are prescribed in 25 CFR 11.208, the BIA must notify you or your guardian, as applicable, to provide you or your guardian, as applicable, with an opportunity to challenge the BIA's decision to restrict your IIM account as specified in subpart E.
§ 518.4 What must a tribe submit to the Commission as part of its petition? A petition for a certificate of self-regulation is complete under this part when it contains: ( a ) Two copies on 81 ⁄ 2′′ × 11′′ paper of a petition for self-regulation approved by the governing body of the tribe and certified as authentic by an authorized tribal official;
( b ) A description of how the tribe meets the eligibility criteria in § 518.3, which may include supporting documentation; and
( c ) The following information with supporting documentation: ( 1 ) A brief history of each gaming operation(s), including the opening dates and periods of voluntary or involuntary closure;
( 2 ) An organizational chart of the tribal regulatory body;
( 3 ) A brief description of the criteria tribal regulators must meet before being eligible for employment as a tribal regulator;
( 4 ) A brief description of the process by which the tribal regulatory body is funded, and the funding level for the three years immediately preceding the date of the petition;
( 5 ) A list of the current regulators and employees of the tribal regulatory body, their complete resumes, their titles, the dates they began employment, and, if serving limited terms, the expiration date of such terms;
( 6 ) A brief description of the accounting system(s) at the gaming operation which tracks the flow of the gaming revenues;
( 7 ) A list of gaming activity internal controls at the gaming operation(s);
( 8 ) A description of the record keeping system(s) for all investigations, enforcement actions, and prosecutions of violations of the tribal gaming ordinance or regulations, for the three (3)-year period immediately preceding the date of the petition; and
( 9 ) The tribe's current set of gaming regulations, if not included in the approved tribal gaming ordinance.
#### In the Matter of Arthur Melendez, Petitioner, v Board of Education of Yonkers City School District et al., Respondents.

[828 NYS2d 67]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Bernard E Pierorazio, Interim Superintendent of the Yonkers Public Schools, dated September 7, 2005, which adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer, dated August 26, 2005, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner was guilty of two charges of misconduct and insubordination and terminating his employment.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, and the determination is annulled, with costs.

The petitioner Arthur Melendez was terminated from his employment as a school safety officer after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law article 75. He commenced this proceeding to annul that determination asserting, inter alia, that the designation of the hearing officer was not made by an officer or body having the power to remove him as required by Civil Service Law § 75 (2). Consequently, he argues, the report of the hearing officer was a nullity, and the determination based upon it was arbitrary. We grant the petition.

In the absence of a specific designation of the power to remove, the power to remove is a function of the power to appoint *(see Matter of McComb v Reasoner,*29 AD3d 795 [2006]). Here, the petitioner asserts, pursuant to Education Law article 52, the body with the power to remove him was the Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District, not the Superintendent of the Yonkers Public Schools who signed the designation *(see*Education Law §§ 2554, 2566, 2573). At oral argument, the respondents agreed that the Education Law was controlling. On this record, we must conclude that the designation of the hearing officer was not by an officer or body having the power to remove the petitioner as required by Civil Service Law § 75 (2) *(cf. Matter of Elliott v Arlington Cent. School Dist.,*143 AD2d 662 [1988]). Thus, the report of the hearing officer was a nullity, and the determination based upon it arbitrary *(see Matter of Wiggins v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*60 NY2d 385, 387 *815[1983]; *McComb v Reasoner, supra*at 795). Because this objection would have terminated the proceeding within the meaning of CPLR 7804 (g), it should have been decided by the Supreme Court prior to transferring the proceeding to this Court for determination of the substantial evidence issue. However, we have reached the merits of the argument in the interest of judicial economy *(see Matter of Baker v Chief of N.Y. City Tr. Police Dept.,*232 AD2d 632 [1996]).

In light of our determination, the petitioner’s remaining contentions need not be reached. Miller, J.E, Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Asiru Bakare, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 751]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), imposed January 29, 2003, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, PJ., Adams, Krausman, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 20—CREDIT CONTROL**
### subpart 1—transfers by federal land banks to federal land bank associations
### **CHAPTER 43—ACTIONS AGAINST PERSONS COMMITTING BANK FRAUD CRIMES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—DECLARATIONS PROVIDING NEW CLAIMS TO UNITED STATES

Sec.
4201.
Filing of confidential declarations by private persons.
4202.
Contents of declarations.
4203.
Confidentiality of declarations.
4204.
Ineligibility to file valid declarations.
4205.
Rights of declarants; participation in actions, awards.
4206.
Rights of declarants; notifications; Government accountability.
4207.
Unreviewed declarations; petition to pursue action as private contractor.
4208.
Nonreviewability of action by Attorney General.
4209.
Repealed.
4210.
Sources of payments to declarants.
4211.
Repealed.
4212.
Protection for declarants.
4213.
Promulgation of regulations.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—DECLARATIONS PROVIDING UNITED STATES WITH NEW INFORMATION CONCERNING RECOVERY OF ASSETS

4221.
Filing of confidential declarations by private persons identifying specific assets.
4222.
Contents of declarations.
4223.
Confidentiality of declarations.
4224.
Ineligibility to file valid declarations.
4225.
Rights of declarants; participation in actions, awards.
4226.
Rights of declarants; notifications; Government accountability.
4227.
Unreviewed declarations; petition to pursue action as private contractor.
4228.
Nonreviewability of action by Attorney General.
4229.
Protection for declarants.
4230.
Promulgation of regulations.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—USE OF PRIVATE LEGAL RESOURCES

4241.
Authority to enter into contracts for private counsel.
4242.
Contract decisions nonreviewable.
4243.
Representation.
4244.
Contract provisions.
4245.
Counterclaims.
4246.
Awards of costs and fees to prevailing plaintiff.
4247.
Promulgation of regulations.
### §929. Municipal leases

A lease to a municipality shall not be treated as an executory contract or unexpired lease for the purposes of section 365 or 502(b)(6) of this title solely by reason of its being subject to termination in the event the debtor fails to appropriate rent.

(Added Pub. L. 100–597, §9, Nov. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 3030.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 3, 1988, but not applicable to any case commenced under this title before that date, see section 12 of Pub. L. 100–597, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 383 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 161
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 383

                          [Report No. 106-476]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 1999

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of November 18, 1999, 
providing for consideration or disposition of any of the following 
measures:
            (1) A bill or joint resolution making continuing 
        appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, any amendment thereto, 
        any conference report thereon, or any amendment reported in 
        disagreement from a conference thereon.
            (2) A bill or joint resolution making general 
        appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, 
        any amendment thereto, any conference report thereon, or any 
        amendment reported in disagreement from a conference thereon.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 161

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 383

                          [Report No. 106-476]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 17, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Program manual: radiologicalemergency preparedness.**
 
2011 | 2015 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:HS 5.108:R 11/
Item Number:0520-E-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001018134
 
March 12, 2018
# CA2006180EN.01000301.xml

| 2.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 180/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 180/3

---

VACANCY IN THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES — LEGAL COUNSEL

VACANCY IN THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES — LEGAL COUNSEL

(2006/C 180 A/01)

The European Central Bank is seeking applications to fill the position of a Legal Counsel in the Directorate General Legal-Services. More details on the profile and tasks covered in this position, as well as information on how to apply can be obtained on the ECB's website at www.ecb.int (Job opportunities).

---
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 436

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage stamp

should be issued commemorating the 75th anniversary of the commissioning of U.S. Route 66.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 2000

Mrs. WILSON (for herself, Mr. SKEEN, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, and Mr.

STUMP) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

a postage stamp should be issued commemorating the

75th anniversary of the commissioning of U.S. Route

66.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the

4 United States Postal Service commemorating the

5 75th anniversary of the commissioning of U.S.

6 Route 66; and
2

•HRES 436 IH

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

3 such a postage stamp be issued.

Æ
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4316 — Atos Origin/Banksys/BCC) Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 213 , 05/09/2006 P. 0006 - 0006 *

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4316 — Atos Origin/Banksys/BCC)

(2006/C 213/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. On 25 August 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] by which the undertaking Atos Worldline S.A.S. ("AW", France) controlled by Atos Origin S.A. ("AO", France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertakings Banksys N.V./S.A. ("Banksys", Belgium) and Bank Card Company ("BCC", Belgium) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for AO: various information technology services;

- for AW: transaction processing services for payment cards, customer relationship management ("CRM") services and multi-channel contact services (Internet and voice services);

- for Banksys: commercial acquiring services for national debit cards, transaction processing services for payment cards and payment terminal business services;

- for BCC: commercial acquiring services for international debit and credit cards.

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4316 — Atos Origin/Banksys/BCC, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 39.504 May schools carry over contingency funds to a subsequent fiscal year?

Bureau-operated schools may carry over funds to the next fiscal year.
### Corporate Powers
§ 63.21 Are there other factors that may disqualify an applicant, volunteer or employee from placement in a position which involves regular contact with or control over Indian children? Yes. ( a ) An applicant, volunteer, or employee may be disqualified from consideration or continuing employment if it is found that: ( 1 ) The individual's misconduct or negligence interfered with or affected a current or prior employer's performance of duties and responsibilities.
( 2 ) The individual's criminal or dishonest conduct affected the individual's performance or the performance of others.
( 3 ) The individual made an intentional false statement, deception or fraud on an examination or in obtaining employment.
( 4 ) The individual has refused to furnish testimony or cooperate with an investigation.
( 5 ) The individual's alcohol or substance abuse is of a nature and duration that suggests the individual could not perform the duties of the position or would directly threaten the property or safety of others.
( 6 ) The individual has illegally used narcotics, drugs, or other controlled substances without evidence of substantial rehabilitation.
( 7 ) The individual knowingly and willfully engaged in an act or activities designed to disrupt government programs.
( b ) An individual must be disqualified for Federal employment if any statutory or regulatory provision would prevent his/her lawful employment.
### **CHAPTER 15—FEDERAL LOAN AGENCY**
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

76-117 

November 3, 1976 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041 Termination by Plan Administrator 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to the inquiry from * * * of your firm and subsequent telephone conversations between * * * of

my staff and representatives of * * * (the "Company"). The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") has

been asked to determine whether there has been a plan termination under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974 (the "Act") as a result of the Company's termination of participation of two of its subsidiaries in

the: * * * (the "Plan"). 

As I understand the pertinent facts, the Company and some of its divisions and subsidiaries, all of which are under

common control within the meaning of Section 4001(b) of the Act, participate in the Plan. The Board of Directors of

the Company, pursuant to Section 8.01 of the Plan, has adopted resolutions terminating the participation in the Plan, as

of July 30, 1976, of two of its subsidiaries, * * * 

* * * The Plan provides, the effect, that if the Company terminates the participation of a participating employer,

rather than if such employer itself terminates its participation, benefits are payable with respect to each such employer's

participating employees [*2] without regard to the cessation of contributions by the entity that employed that participant.

That is, the entire trust fund is obligated for the payment of all benefits under the Plan upon the termination of

participation of a participating employer by the Company (See Sections 8.01 and 8.03 of the Plan). As a result of the

Board of Directors' action, there was a 7.5% reduction in the total number of participants in the Plan. Each * * *

employee participating in the Plan will be fully vested in his benefits accrued under the Plan as of July 30, 1976. 

Based on the above facts, the termination of participation of * * * from the Plan did not result in a plan termination

under Title IV. Therefore, no termination notice need be submitted to the PBGC under Section 4041 of the Act. 

We hope this information is of assistance to you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### §1323. Modification of plan before confirmation

(a) The debtor may modify the plan at any time before confirmation, but may not modify the plan so that the plan as modified fails to meet the requirements of section 1322 of this title.

(b) After the debtor files a modification under this section, the plan as modified becomes the plan.

(c) Any holder of a secured claim that has accepted or rejected the plan is deemed to have accepted or rejected, as the case may be, the plan as modified, unless the modification provides for a change in the rights of such holder from what such rights were under the plan before modification, and such holder changes such holder's previous acceptance or rejection.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2649.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

The debtor is permitted to modify the plan before confirmation without court approval so long as the modified plan, which becomes the plan on filing, complies with the requirements of section 1322.

The original acceptance or rejection of a plan by the holder of a secured claim remains binding unless the modified plan changes the rights of the holder and the holder withdraws or alters its earlier acceptance or rejection.
### §7726. Oversight and inspections

(a) Inspections Required.—The Secretary of the Army shall provide for the oversight of the Cemeteries to ensure the highest quality standards are maintained by providing for the periodic inspection of the administration, operation and maintenance, and construction elements applicable to the Cemeteries. The inspections shall be conducted by personnel of the Department of the Army with the assistance, as the Secretary considers appropriate, of personnel from other Federal agencies and civilian experts.

(b) Submission of Results.—Not later than 120 days after the completion of an inspection conducted under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the inspection and recommendations and a plan for corrective actions to be taken in response to the inspection.

(Added Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title V, §591(a)(1), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1441, §4726; renumbered §7726, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7726 was renumbered section 8896 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4726 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.