alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006267EN.01000602.xml

| 1.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4327 — EGIS/Alpine/Hochtief/Austrian Highway A5)

(2006/C 267/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 8 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4327. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4327. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JASON S. REESE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee.

No. 4D2022

- 3259

[ March 21, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Edward H. Merrigan, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No.

19008538CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Sue

- Ellen Kenny , Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A

. Folley,

Assistant Attorney General , West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, G ERBER and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

March 15, 2013

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Certification
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust II (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The above
certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.



By:

/s/ MICHAEL J. ULRICHMichael J. UlrichVice President The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust II
# C_2006190EN.01000301.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Poitiers, France) — Conseil général de la Vienne v Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects

(Case C-419/04) (1)

1

(Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Remission of import duties - Conditions - Article 871 of the regulation implementing the Community Customs Code - Scope of the obligation to submit the case to the Commission - Failure on the part of a person liable for payment acting in good faith to declare additional royalties which should have been incorporated in the customs value of imported goods)

(2006/C 190/05)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d'appel de Poitiers

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Conseil général de la Vienne

Appellant:

Respondent: Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects

Respondent:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour d'Appel de Poitiers (Court of Appeal, Poitiers, France) — Interpretation of Article 871 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1) — Recovery of the amount of the customs debt — Obligatory nature of reference to the Commission in the event of doubt as to the scope of the criteria relating to the recovery or the remission of duties resulting from a customs debt

Operative part of the judgment

Article 871 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1677/98 of 29 July 1998, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the context of a recovery procedure or a procedure for remission of uncollected customs duties, the national customs authorities are not required to submit the case to the Commission for a decision where the doubts which they had had as regards the precise scope of the criteria laid down in Article 220(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code with regard to a particular case have disappeared, even after those authorities have expressed their intention to refer the matter to the Commission, or where the doubts relate to the subsequent entry in the accounts of customs duties which were not collected due to an omission on the part of an importer acting in good faith to declare royalties which should have been incorporated in the customs value of the imported goods.

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

1

---
H. Res. 264

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 30, 1999.

Whereas Lance Armstrong was diagnosed with advanced testicular cancer in 1996 and given a less than 50 percent

chance of survival by doctors;

Whereas testicular cancer is the most common form of cancer

in men between 15 and 35 years old;

Whereas Lance Armstrong has established the Lance Armstrong Foundation, devoted to fighting cancer through

awareness, education, and research;

Whereas Lance Armstrong has made one of the most memorable comebacks in sports history;

Whereas the Tour de France is one of the most physically demanding endurance sporting events in the world; and

Whereas Lance Armstrong has honored the Nation with his

courageous performance by winning the Tour de France:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates Lance Armstrong on his spectacular performance, winning the 1999 Tour de France;

and
2

•HRES 264 EH

(2) recognizes the contribution Lance Armstrong’s

perseverance has made to inspire those fighting cancer

and survivors of cancer around the world.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 13.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Platinum & Palladium Trust (the "Trust") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric S. Sprott, Principal Executive Officer of Sprott Asset
Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



This
certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement has been provided
to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date:
April 29, 2013

/s/ERIC S. SPROTT Eric S. Sprott Principal Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
### §9655. Arms and ammunition: agencies and departments of United States

(a) Whenever required for the protection of public money and property, the Secretary of the Air Force may lend arms and their accouterments, and issue ammunition, to a department or independent agency of the United States, upon request of its head. Property lent or issued under this subsection may be delivered to an officer of the department or agency designated by the head thereof, and that officer shall account for the property to the Secretary of the Air Force. Property lent or issued under this subsection and not properly expended shall be returned when it is no longer needed.

(b) The department or agency to which property is lent or issued under subsection (a) shall transfer funds to the credit of the Department of the Air Force to cover the costs of—

(1) ammunition issued;

(2) replacing arms and accouterments that have been lost or destroyed or cannot be repaired;

(3) repairing arms and accouterments returned to the Department of the Air Force; and

(4) making and receiving shipments by the Department of the Air Force.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 582.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9655(a)9655(b) | 50:61 (less proviso).50:61 (proviso). | Mar. 3, 1879, ch. 183 (2d par. under "Miscellaneous"); restated Apr. 14, 1937, ch. 79, 50 Stat. 63. |

9655(b)

50:61 (proviso).

In subsection (a), the word "lend" is substituted for the word "issue", with respect to arms and accouterments, since the property must be returned when the necessity for its use has expired. The words "and not properly expended" are inserted for clarity. The words "United States" are substituted for the word "Government". The word "their" is substituted for the words "suitable * * * for use therewith". The words "it is no longer needed" are substituted for the words "the necessity for their use has expired".

In subsection (b), the words "hereafter", "borrowed", and "under the authority of this section" are omitted as surplusage.
§ 215.22 Operations. ( a ) All shafts shall be securely cribbed to a point at least 8 inches above the immediate surrounding surface and cribbing shall be maintained in good condition during the life of the mining lease: *Provided, however,* That at any time shafts may be permanently sealed by a reinforced concrete slab after first obtaining the written approval of the duly authorized representative of the Department of the Interior. The slab shall be so placed as to prevent caving of the ground around the shaft collar.
( b ) All shafts, prior to the expiration, surrender, or upon cancellation of the mining lease or abandonment of the property, shall be permanently sealed so as to prevent the caving of the ground around the shaft collar: *Provided, however,* That this requirement may be waived after first obtaining the written consent of the duly authorized representative of the Department of the Interior.
( c ) All shaft entrances not permanently sealed shall be so fenced, boxed, or covered as to prevent persons or animals from falling into the mine when the shaft is not in actual use, and such fencing, boxing, or covering shall be maintained in good condition during the life of the mining lease.
( d ) All shafts where hoisting is done shall be boxed or fenced on three sides and the fourth side equipped with a gate which shall be kept closed when access to the shaft is not necessary.
( e ) All churn drill holes shall be securely plugged to the surface unless used for ventilation or other mining purposes, in which case they shall be cased or otherwise prevented from caving or becoming a hazard to persons or animals. If cased, the casing shall extend 4 feet above the collar of the hole.
#### § 290.18 Where should the Indian tribe submit the tribal revenue allocation plan?

You must submit your tribal revenue allocation plan to your respective Superintendent. The Superintendent will review the tribal revenue allocation plan to make sure it has been properly adopted in accordance with applicable tribal law. The Superintendent will then transmit the tribal revenue allocation plan promptly to the ABO.
(logo)**Prudential**

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:         **WFRBS 2012-C6**

Period: **January 1, 2018 to December 31,2018(the "Reporting Period")**

 

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I, Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity asPresident and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role asSub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")dated as of April 1, 2012, pertaining to the above-referenced certificates,that:

 

       (i)           areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement  during theperiod noted above, and  of the performance of the Company under theAgreement during the  relevant  period  has been made under mysupervision, and

 

     (ii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

   (iii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled itsobligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

    (iv)           theCompany has maintained an effective internal control system over the servicingof mortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

     (v)           theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

Effectiveas of February 22, 2019

 

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
### §514. Bounties prohibited; substitutes prohibited

(a) No bounty may be paid to induce any person to enlist in an armed force. A clothing allowance or enlistment bonus authorized by law is not a bounty for the purposes of this subsection.

(b) No person liable for active duty in an armed force under this subtitle may furnish a substitute for that active duty. No person may be enlisted or appointed in an armed force as a substitute for another person.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 19.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 514(a)  514(b) | 50 App.:458 (1st sentence, less applicability to induction).50 App.:458 (last sentence, less applicability to induction). | June 24, 1948, ch. 625, §8 (less applicability to induction), 62 Stat. 614. |

514(b)

50 App.:458 (last sentence, less applicability to induction).

In subsection (b), the words "active duty" are substituted for the words "training and service". The word "may" is substituted for the words "shall be permitted or allowed". The last sentence is substituted for 50 App.:458 (words between 1st and last semicolons). 50 App.:458 (words after last semicolon) is omitted as applicable only to induction.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6802

KENDALL GREEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SGT. D. ANDERSON, of Lee Correctional Institution; JON 

OZMINT, Director of SCDC; LT. RICHARDSON, SMU Security; MS. 

L. JOHNSON, Grievance Coordinator; MAJOR JAMES C. DEAN, 

Security Over Institution; WARDEN PADULA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (2:10-cv-03080-CMC)

Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kendall Green, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, 

WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kendall Green appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Green v. Anderson, No. 2:10-cv-03080-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 

11, 2012). We deny Green’s motion for a transcript at 

government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Form of Stock Certificate of common stock



 

 
  
 Exhibit 4.4

 MGY 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 CUSIP 624581 20 3 
 This Certifies that 
 is the record holder of 
 FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $.001 PAR VALUE, OF 
 MOVIE GALLERY, INC. 
 transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent
and registered by the Registrar. 
 WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers. 
 Dated: 
 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
 AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY

 (NEW YORK, N Y.) 
 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
 BY 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 
 ASSISTANT SECRETARY 
 EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT 







 

 
  
 The Corporation
shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional, or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or series thereof and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the Corporation’s Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:

 TEN COM – as tenants in common 
 TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties 
 JT TEN – as joint tenants
with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– (Cust) Custodian (Minor) 
 under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
 Act (State) 
 UNIF TRF MIN ACT– (Cust) Custodian (until age ) 
 (Minor) under Uniform Transfers 
 to Minors Act (State) 
 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 
 Shares of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney 
 to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated 
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY 
 CHANGE WHATEVER. 
 Signature(s) Guaranteed 
 By 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
# C_2006274EN.01000101.xml

| 10.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 November 2006

(2006/C 274/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2796 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 151,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4583 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67240 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1195 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5967 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,88 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2315 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5777 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,038 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 259,78 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8225 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5055 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 36,085 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8575 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6689 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4489 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9613 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9259 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9989 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 198,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3504 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0660 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3376 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 671,87 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6648 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,910 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1460 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,002 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2796

JPY

Japanese yen

151,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4583

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67240

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1195

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5967

ISK

Iceland króna

86,88

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2315

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5777

CZK

Czech koruna

28,038

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

259,78

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8225

RON

Romanian leu

3,5055

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

36,085

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8575

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6689

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4489

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9613

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9259

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9989

KRW

South Korean won

1 198,47

ZAR

South African rand

9,3504

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0660

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3376

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 671,87

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6648

PHP

Philippine peso

63,910

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1460

THB

Thai baht

47,002

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IV

House Calendar No. 201

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 469

[Report No. 106–572]

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 11, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 or before the legislative day of Friday, April 14, 2000,

3 for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules,

4 provided that the object of any such motion is announced

5 from the floor at least one hour before the motion is of6 fered. In scheduling the consideration of legislation under

7 this authority, the Speaker or his designee shall consult

8 with the Minority Leader or his designee.
House Calendar No. 201

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 469

[Report No. 106–572]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend

the rules.

APRIL 11, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed