alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

U.S., India launch Exercise Tiger TRIUMPH 2024March 21, 2024 — Indian and U.S. combined armed forces began Exercise Tiger TRIUMPH 2024 with the arrival of amphibious transport dock ship USS Somerset (LPD 25), March 18 and an opening ceremony March 19.This is the... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 383 Madison Avenue31st FloorNew York, New York 10179  RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-C6 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-Certificates, Series 2012-C6 Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  March 1, 2016  /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ADVANCE STORES COMPANY,
INCORPORATED FOR THE FORTY WEEK PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 10, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-19-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-10-1998
<CASH>                                          36,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    363,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               440,595
<PP&E>                                         243,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 607,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          289,653
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,601)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   607,242
<SALES>                                        802,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               802,839
<CGS>                                          493,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  493,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,912
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,007
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David Liu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|





/s/
          David LiuDavid LiuChairman and
          Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 8, 2007

---
# C_2006212EN.01000402.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — Belgium) — Axel Kittel v Belgian State

(Joined Cases C-439/04 and C-440/04) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Deduction of input tax - ‘Carousel’ fraud - Contract of sale incurably void under domestic law)

(2006/C 212/07)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Axel Kittel (C-439/04) Belgian State (C-440/04)

Applicants:

Defendants: Belgian State (C-439/04) Recolta Recycling SPRL (C-440-04)

Defendants:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Belgian Cour de Cassation — Interpretation of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Supplies of goods under a contract of sale which is incurably void — Carousel fraud — Loss of the right to deduct for a purchaser in good faith

Operative part of the judgment

Where a recipient of a supply of goods is a taxable person who did not and could not know that the transaction concerned was connected with a fraud committed by the seller, Article 17 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995, must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes a rule of national law under which the fact that the contract of sale is void — by reason of a civil law provision which renders that contract incurably void as contrary to public policy for unlawful basis of the contract attributable to the seller — causes that taxable person to lose the right to deduct the value added tax he has paid. It is irrelevant in this respect whether the fact that the contract is void is due to fraudulent evasion of value added tax or to other fraud.

By contrast, where it is ascertained, having regard to objective factors, that the supply is to a taxable person who knew or should have known that, by his purchase, he was participating in a transaction connected with fraudulent evasion of value added tax, it is for the national court to refuse that taxable person entitlement to the right to deduct.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 08.01.2005.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0328

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DAVID ALLEN PEIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 3, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2024

03/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0328
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 293

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of ‘‘National

Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 14, 1999

Mr. CLYBURN (for himself, Mr. BISHOP, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. CARSON,

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. CLAY, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. CONYERS, Mr.

CUMMINGS, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. DIXON, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. FORD,

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms.

JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. JEFFERSON, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON

of Texas, Ms. KILPATRICK, Ms. LEE, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Ms. MILLENDERMCDONALD, Ms. NORTON, Mr. OWENS, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. RANGEL, Mr.

RUSH, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. TOWNS, Mrs.

JONES of Ohio, Ms. WATERS, Mr. WATT of North Carolina, and Mr.

WYNN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in

support of ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and

Universities Week’’.

Whereas there are 105 historically black colleges and universities in the United States;

Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality

education so essential to full participation in a complex,

highly technological society;
2

• HRES 293 IH

Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage

and have played a prominent role in American history;

Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many

underprivileged students to attain their full potential

through higher education;

Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and universities are deserving of national recognition; and

Whereas Senate Resolution 178 would designate the week beginning September 19, 1999, as ‘‘National Historically

Black Colleges and Universities Week’’: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved,

2 That the House of Representatives—

3 (1) supports the goals and ideas of ‘‘National

4 Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week’’;

5 and

6 (2) requests that the President issue a procla7 mation calling on the people of the United States

8 and interested groups to conduct appropriate cere9 monies, activities, and programs to demonstrate sup10 port for historically black colleges and universities in

11 the United States.

Æ
#### § 42.11 Information collection.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*) (PRA), unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This part in §§ 42.6, 42.7, and 42.9 contains collections of information subject to the PRA. These collections have been approved by OMB under control number 1076-0163.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 527 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 20, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4201) to amend the Communications Act of 
1934 to clarify the service obligations of noncommercial educational broadcast 
stations. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment 
recommended by the Committee on Commerce now printed in the bill shall be 
considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as 
amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Commerce; (2) a further amendment in the nature of a 
substitute printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule 
XVIII, if offered by representative Markey of Massachusetts or his designee, 
which shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### SUBCHAPTER II—OFFICERS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7034

DEMETRIUS GATHERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COLIE RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (CA-04-399) Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demetrius Gathers, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Demetrius Gathers seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gathers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 63.33 What must an application for Indian child protection and family violence prevention program funds include? In addition to the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, as amended, 25 U.S.C. 450 *et seq.*, contracting requirements, each application must provide the following information: ( a ) The name and address of the agency or official to be responsible for the investigation of reported cases of child abuse and child neglect, the treatment and prevention of incidents of family violence, and the provision of immediate shelter and related assistance for victims of family violence and their dependents;
( b ) Projected service population of the program;
( c ) Projected service area of the program; and
( d ) Projected number of cases per month.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 82PA15-2

Filed 3 November 2017

IN THE MATTER OF: A.E.C.

On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review an order of the 

Court of Appeals entered on 24 October 2016 dismissing an appeal from orders signed 

on 2 February 2016 by Judge Edward A. Pone in District Court, Cumberland County. 

Heard in the Supreme Court on 11 October 2017.

Elizabeth Kennedy-Gurnee, Christopher L. Carr, and James D. Dill for 

Cumberland County Department of Social Services, petitioner-appellant.

Beth A. Hall, Attorney Advocate for appellee Guardian ad Litem.

Joyce L. Terres, Assistant Appellate Defender, for respondent-appellee-father.

PER CURIAM.

CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
§ 293.14 When does a compact or amendment take effect? ( a ) A compact or amendment, that is affirmatively approved or approved by operation of law, takes effect on the date that notice of its approval is published in the Federal Register.
( b ) The notice of affirmative approval or approval by operation of law must be published in the Federal Register within 90 days from the date the compact or amendment is received by the Office of Indian Gaming.
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of RLJ Entertainment, Inc.; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | April 30, 2013 |   | /s/ MIGUEL PENELLA      |
|--------|----------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |           |   | Miguel Penella          |
|   |           |   | Chief Executive Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Alaska, California, Hawaii, and Nevada)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, April 21, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, April 21, 2011, at 2 p.m., Pacific Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. 
For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, 
WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-4322 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.2 to 2010 10-Q

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Convergys Corporation (the Company), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2010 (the Report), I, Earl C. Shanks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Earl C. Shanks     
|Earl C. Shanks         
|Chief Financial Officer

May 5, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Convergys Corporation and will be retained by Convergys
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
#### § 582.1 What does this part cover?

This part applies to appeals from the Chair's decision to disapprove a gaming ordinance, resolution, or amendment thereto under part 522 of this chapter.