alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1

October 16, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave.,

SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption No 13171 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2140

Dear Madam, Sir,

On October 9, 2015, the FAA granted T Baker Smith, LLC a Section 333 rule exemption

and a Small UAS Operations 200 feet and below for Commercial Purposes COA for the

purposes of aerial data collection. This COA allows the use of the DJI Inspire 1 and

SenseFly eBee UAS. The petitioner seeks an amendment to the existing 333 to allow, in

addition to the UAS listed above, the use of a DJI S1000 Plus and SenseFly eXom.

The DJI S1000 Plus is similar in aerodynamics to the Inspire 1. Although slightly larger,

it is still well under 55lbs, weighing only 20lbs with max payload. This UAS is operated

exactly the same as the Inspire 1 and has the same safety features. The DJI S1000 Plus is

a more professional UAS and has the ability to carry better cameras and sensors than the

hobby targeted Inspire 1.

The eXom is also similar in many regards to the Inspire 1 in size, weight and

aerodynamics. However, the eXom is designed mainly for the purpose of aerial mapping

and infrastructure inspections such as bridges, cell phone towers, industrial complexes,

etc. As explained in detail below, the eXom is far more technologically advanced than

the Inspire 1 as it has many built in sensors to facilitate its tasks. It is also a much more

expensive platform. Current cost of the eXom is around $45,000 as compared to the

$3200 for the Inspire 1. The intended uses of the eXom will not require flight above 200

feet and all requirements of the existing COA will be complied with. The eXom is unique

in today's UAS marketplace as it is the only available UAS built specifically for low

altitude infrastructure inspection and mapping.

Exhibits:

1) S1000+ User Manual v1.2

2) eXom Extended User Manual v1.1
Page 2

The name and address of the applicant is:

T Baker Smith, LLC

Attention: Eric Deroche

PO Box 2266

Houma, LA 70361

412 South Van Ave

Houma, LA 70363

Telephone: (985) 868-1050

Email: eric.deroche@tbsmith.com

Granting this amendment will allow this new technology to be used in many industries

and provide significant safety improvements and cost savings to these businesses. "The

public good will is well served by allowing this amendment to be issued. All operations

of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the existing

exemption. This exemption amendment request is similar to the already issued in

precedent, and this request should qualify for summary processing as the FAA has

already provided public notice of and granted similar exemptions. Such exemptions are

No. 11659 in Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–0545 for Fovea Aero Systems LLC,

and No. 11373A Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015−0060. Please feel free to contact the

undersigned should you have any question or concerns regarding this request for an

amendment to the Exemption request.

Sincerely,

Eric Deroche

Director of Office and Field Technology

T Baker Smith, LLC
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 640 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 19, 2000.
    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
Thursday, October 19, 2000, for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the 
rules and pass, or adopt, the following measures:
            (1) the bill (H.R. 2780) to authorize the Attorney General to 
        provide grants for organizations to find missing adults;
            (2) the resolution (H. Res. 605) expressing the sense of the House 
        of Representatives that communities should implement the Amber Plan to 
        expedite the recovery of abducted children;
            (3) the bill (H.R. 4541) to reauthorize and amend the Commodity 
        Exchange Act to promote legal certainty, enhance competition, and reduce 
        systemic risk in markets for futures and over-the-counter derivatives, 
        and for other purposes;
            (4) the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 271) expressing the 
        support of Congress for activities to increase public awareness of 
        multiple sclerosis; and
            (5) the bill (H.R. 2592) to amend the Consumer Products Safety Act 
        to provide that low-speed electric bicycles are consumer products 
        subject to such Act.
    Sec. 2. House Resolutions 615 and 633 are laid on the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 616 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 303
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 616

                          [Report No. 106-952]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4205) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for 
   military activities of the Department of Defense and for military 
construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 
                     2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 10, 2000

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4205) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for 
   military activities of the Department of Defense and for military 
construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 
                     2001, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4205) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for military 
activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, 
to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 2001, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 303

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 616

                          [Report No. 106-952]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4205) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for 
   military activities of the Department of Defense and for military 
construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 
                     2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 10, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
### §7532. Factories and arsenals: manufacture at

The Secretary of the Army shall have supplies needed for the Department of the Army made in factories or arsenals owned by the United States, so far as those factories or arsenals can make those supplies on an economical basis.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 254, §4532; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title III, §323(a), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3343; renumbered §7532, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4532(a)4532(b) | 5:181–4(e).50:55. | June 28, 1950, ch. 383, §101(e), 64 Stat. 264.R.S. 1666. |

4532(b)

50:55.

R.S. 1666.

The words "Except as otherwise provided by law", in 5:181–4(e), are omitted, since there is no law within the scope of the exception. The word "made" is substituted for the words "manufactured or produced". The words "United States" are substituted for the word "Government", in 5:181–4(e). The words "which he considers" are substituted for the words "as, in his judgment", in 50:55. The words "useless or", in 50:55, are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4532 of this title as this section.

2014—Pub. L. 113–291 struck out "; abolition of" after "manufacture at" in section catchline, struck out subsec. (a) designation before "The Secretary", and struck out subsec. (b) which read as follows: "The Secretary may abolish any United States arsenal that he considers unnecessary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# In Close Orbit: Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 23 Aboard USS Tripoli (LHA 7) 

By Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Peter BurghartUSS Tripoli Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
# C_2006178EN.01000302.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/3

---

Judgement of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 June 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-475/04) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/58/EC - Electronic communications - Processing of personal data - Protection of privacy - Protection of natural persons - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 178/05)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Zavvos and M. Shotter, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: N. Dafniou and M. Tassopoulou, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to transpose, within the prescribed period, Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ 2002 L 201, p. 37)

Operative part of the judgement

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 18.12.2004.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                           RENAISSANCE MEDIA GROUP LLC
                        RENAISSANCE MEDIA (LOUISIANA) LLC
                        RENAISSANCE MEDIA (TENNESSEE) LLC
                      RENAISSANCE MEDIA CAPITAL CORPORATION
                             12405 Powerscourt Drive
                               St. Louis, MO 63131


                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
                  OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      I, Kent D. Kalkwarf, the Chief Financial Officer of Renaissance Media
Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC
and Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (collectively, the "Company") in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission:

         o        fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         o        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/  Kent D. Kalkwarf
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Kent D. Kalkwarf
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     August 9, 2002
#### § 39.1101 Addition of pre-kindergarten as a weight factor to the Indian School Equalization Formula in fiscal year 1982.

The Director, in consultation with the tribes and school boards, shall determine appropriate weight factors needed to include pre-kindergarten programs in the Indian School Equalization Formula in fiscal year 1982. Based on a needs assessment, to be completed by January 1, 1980, pre-kindergarten programs shall be included in the Bureau's education request for fiscal year 1982.
# C_2006224EN.01002002.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 22 June 2006 — Netto Supermarkt GmbH & Co. OHG v Finanzamt Malchin

(Case C-271/06)

(2006/C 224/38)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof, München

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Netto Supermarkt GmbH & Co. OHG

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Malchin

Defendant:

Question referred

Do the provisions of Community law on exemption from tax for exports to a third country preclude the granting of exemption from tax by the Member State on the grounds of fairness where the conditions for exemption are not satisfied but the taxable person was unable, even by exercising due commercial care, to recognise that they were not met? (1)

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ L 145, 13.6.1977, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No.1) of APT Systems, Inc. (the "Company) for the year ended January 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Hussey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  /s/Carl Hussey Carl Hussey Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) January 14, 2015
§ 63.17 How does an employer determine suitability for employment and efficiency of service? ( a ) *Adjudication* is the process employers use to determine suitability for employment and efficiency of service. The adjudication process protects the interests of the employer and the rights of applicants and employees. Adjudication requires uniform evaluation to ensure fair and consistent judgment.
( b ) Each case is judged on its own merits. All available information, both favorable and unfavorable, must be considered and assessed in terms of accuracy, completeness, relevance, seriousness, overall significance, and how similar cases have been handled in the past.
( c ) An *adjudicating official* conducts the adjudication. Each Federal agency, Indian tribe, or tribal organization must appoint an adjudicating official, who must first have been the subject of a favorable background investigation. ( 1 ) Indian tribes and tribal organizations must ensure that persons charged with the responsibility for adjudicating employee background investigations are well-qualified and trained.
( 2 ) Indian tribes and tribal organizations should also ensure that individuals who are not trained to adjudicate these types of investigations are supervised by someone who is experienced and receive the training necessary to perform the task.
( d ) Each adjudicating official must be thoroughly familiar with all laws, regulations, and criteria involved in making a determination for suitability.
( e ) The adjudicating official must review the background investigation to determine the character, reputation, and trustworthiness of the individual. At a minimum, the adjudicating official must: ( 1 ) Review each security investigation form and employment application and compare the information provided;
( 2 ) Review the results of written record searches requested from local law enforcement agencies, former employers, former supervisors, employment references, and schools; and
( 3 ) Review the results of the fingerprint charts maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation or other law enforcement information maintained by other agencies.
( f ) Relevancy is a key objective in evaluating investigative data. The adjudicating official must consider prior conduct in light of: ( 1 ) The nature and seriousness of the conduct in question;
( 2 ) The recency and circumstances surrounding the conduct in question;
( 3 ) The age of the individual at the time of the incident;
( 4 ) Societal conditions that may have contributed to the nature of the conduct;
( 5 ) The probability that the individual will continue the type of behavior in question; and,
( 6 ) The individual's commitment to rehabilitation and a change in the behavior in question.
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HealthSouth Corporation. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | October 29, 2013 |   |   |   |
|   |   | By: | /s/ DOUGLAS E. COLTHARP |   |
|   |   |   | Douglas E. Coltharp |   |
|   |   |   | Executive Vice President and |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |