alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 39.221 What is a full school month?

A full school month is each 30-day period following the first day that residential services are provided to students based on the school residential calendar.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 492 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 492

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of 
                          America's teachers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2000

   Ms. Granger (for herself, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Clement, Mr. DeMint, Mr. 
Tancredo, Mr. Burr of North Carolina, Mr. Rogan, Mr. Phelps, Mr. Paul, 
    Mr. Gibbons, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Jenkins, Ms. 
  Sanchez, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Baca, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. 
 Deutsch, and Mr. Hilleary) submitted the following resolution; which 
      was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of 
                          America's teachers.

Whereas the foundation of American freedom and democracy is a strong, effective 
        system of education in which every child can learn in a safe and 
        nurturing environment;
Whereas a first-rate education system depends on a partnership between parents, 
        principals, teachers, and children;
Whereas much of the success of our Nation during the American Century is the 
        result of the hard work and dedication of teachers across the land;
Whereas, in addition to their families, knowledgeable and skillful teachers can 
        have a profound impact on a child's early development and future 
        success;
Whereas, while many people spend their lives building careers, teachers spend 
        their careers building lives;
Whereas our Nation's teachers serve our children beyond the call of duty as 
        coaches, mentors, and advisors without regard to fame or fortune; and
Whereas across this land nearly 3 million men and women experience the joys of 
        teaching young minds the virtues of reading, writing, and arithmetic: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors and recognizes the unique and important 
        achievements of America's teachers; and
            (2) urges all Americans to take a moment to thank and pay 
        tribute to our Nation's teachers.
                                 <all>
```
September	29,	2014

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

Docket	Management	System

400	7th Street	SW,	Plaza	401

Washington,	DC		20591-0001

Re:		Exemption	No.	5549,	as	amended;	Docket	No. FAA-2000-8434

Ladies/Gentlemen:

In	accordance	with	Title	14	of	the	Code	of	Federal	Regulations	(14CFR)	§	11.61,	the	Air	

Transport	Association	of	America	(ATA) dba	Airlines	for	America,	on	behalf	of	its	member	

airlines1 and	other	similarly	situated	Part	121	certificate	holders,	petitions	the	Administrator	

for	an	extension	of	Exemption	No.	5549L (Docket	No. FAA-2000-8434).		This	exemption	is	

scheduled	to	expire	on	January	31,	2015.

Exemption	No.	5549J provides	relief	from	14	CFR	§	121.652(a)	and	(c)	by	permitting	a	pilot	in	

command	under	Part	121	to	conduct	an	instrument	approach	under	certain	weather	

conditions	during	the	first	100	hours	of	service	using	an	alternative	means	approved	by	the	

Administrator	subject	to	certain	conditions	and	limitations.

The conditions	and	circumstances	which	warranted	the	original	grant	of	exemption,	in	regard	

to	public	interest	and	equivalent	levels	of	safety,	continue	to	exist.		This	petition	does	not	seek	

to	change	the	conditions	and	limitations	of	the	current	exemption.	 This	exemption	has	been	

in	use	safely	for	almost	ten	years.

The	renewal	of	this	exemption	is	not	a	controversial	issue.		For	this	reason,	and	the	reasons	

stated	above,	ATA	requests	that	a	finding	of	good	cause	be	made	for	waiving	publication	in	the	

Federal	Register,	(14	CFR	§11.87).		Granting	the	requested	relief	will	set	no	precedents.		The	

existence	of	the	exemption	is	well	known	and	widely	accepted.	

_______________________________________________

1/		Operator	Members:	

Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Atlas Air, Delta Air Lines, Federal Express, Hawaiian Airlines, 

JetBlue Airways, Polar Air Cargo, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, United Parcel Service, US 

Airways.
Docket No. FAA-2000-8434

September	29,	2014

Page	Two

A	summary	of	this	petition	as	required	by	14	CFR	§11.81	is	attached.		

If	you	have	any	questions	or	need	additional	information,	please	call	me	at	(202)	626-4285.

Very	truly	yours,	

Airlines	for	America

By:	__________________________	

Paul	Railsback

Managing	Director	- Operations

(202)	626-4012

prailsback@airlines.org
U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

Docket	Management	System

Docket No. FAA-2000-8434

September	29,	2014

Attachment

SUMMARY	OF	ATA	PETITION

The	Air	Transport	Association,	 on	 behalf	 of	 its	 member	 airlines	 and	 other	 similarly	

situated	Part	121	operators,	petitions	for	an	extension	of	Exemption	No.	5549I.	This	

exemption	 permits	 a	 pilot	 in	 command	 under	 Part	 121	 to	 conduct	 an	 instrument	

approach	procedure to	the	weather	minima	prescribed	by	this	exemption	during	the	

first	100	hours	of	service	as	a	pilot	in	command,	in	the	type	of	airplane	he	or	she	is	

operating,	using	an	alternative	means	approved	by	the	Administrator	of	satisfying	14	

CFR	§121.652(a)	and	(c),	subject	to	certain	conditions	and	limitations.
§ 20.600 Who can apply for financial assistance or social services? ( a ) You can apply for financial assistance or social services under this part if you: ( 1 ) Believe that you are eligible to receive benefits; or
( 2 ) Are applying on behalf of someone who you believe is eligible to receive benefits.
( b ) Under paragraph (a) of this section, any of the following may apply for benefits on behalf of another person: relatives, interested individuals, social services agencies, law enforcement agencies, courts, or other persons or agencies.
H. Res. 565

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 27, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 4516) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001,

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The

conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Stemming Inflation

              																	United States. Office of Emergency Preparedness. 						*Stemming Inflation : The Office of Emergency Preparedness and the 90-Day Freeze*,										1972,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/198,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
(reviewing a district court's sentencing decision for abuse of discretion); 

Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976) (observing that 

we will not interfere with the sentence imposed "[s]o long as the record 

does not demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of 

information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable 

or highly suspect evidence"). 

Having concluded that Barnes is not entitled to relief, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

0eA.419%,‘ 

Hardesty 

,J. 

cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A 

2
```

[109th Congress Public Law 385]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ385.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 2681]]

Public Law 109-385
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To withdraw the Valle Vidal Unit of the Carson National Forest in New 
 Mexico from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws, and for 
         other purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 12, 2006 -  [H.R. 3817]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Valle Vidal Protection Act 
of 2005.>> assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Valle Vidal Protection Act of 2005''.
SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF VALLE VIDAL UNIT, CARSON NATIONAL FOREST, 
                    NEW MEXICO, FROM MINING LAWS.

    (a) Withdrawal.--Subject to subsection (b), the Valle Vidal Unit of 
the Carson National Forest in New Mexico, which consists of 101,794 
acres and is identified as Management Area 21 in the land and resource 
management plan for the Carson National Forest, is hereby withdrawn 
from--
            (1) all forms of entry, appropriation, and disposal under 
        the public land laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) operation of the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing 
        laws and mineral materials laws.

    (b) Treatment of Existing Rights.--The withdrawal required by 
subsection (a) is subject to valid existing rights. If these existing 
rights are relinquished or otherwise acquired by the United States at 
any time after the date of the enactment of this Act, the lands

[[Page 120 STAT. 2682]]

that were subject to the rights shall be immediately withdrawn as 
provided in subsection (a).

    Approved December 12, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3817:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-583 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 24, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit
99.6



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report of Pembina Pipeline Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,
2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
B. Michaleski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The
                                                               Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                                                               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The
                                                               information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
                                                               respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
                                                               of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: March 1, 2013 |                         
|------------------- | ------------------------
|                    |                         
|                    | /s/ Robert B. Michaleski
|                    | Robert B. Michaleski    
|                    | Chief Executive Officer
# C_2006313EN.01000101.xml

| 20.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 December 2006

(2006/C 313/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3158 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4538 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67125 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0252 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6024 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,75 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,164 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5781 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,745 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,13 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6974 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8113 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4169 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,88 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8845 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6824 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5217 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2299 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8981 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0326 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 226,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2168 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2911 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3688 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 026,41 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7057 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,001 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,641 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,073 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3158

JPY

Japanese yen

155,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4538

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67125

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0252

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6024

ISK

Iceland króna

90,75

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,164

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5781

CZK

Czech koruna

27,745

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,13

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6974

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8113

RON

Romanian leu

3,4169

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,88

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8845

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6824

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5217

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2299

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8981

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0326

KRW

South Korean won

1 226,39

ZAR

South African rand

9,2168

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2911

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3688

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 026,41

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7057

PHP

Philippine peso

65,001

RUB

Russian rouble

34,641

THB

Thai baht

47,073

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
H. Res. 666

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 3, 2000.

Resolved, That any organizational caucus or conference

in the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Seventh Congress may begin on or after November 13, 2000.

SEC. 2. As used in this resolution, the term ‘‘organizational caucus or conference’’ means a party caucus or conference authorized to be called under section 202(a) of House

Resolution 988, Ninety-third Congress, agreed to on October

8, 1974, and enacted into permanent law by chapter III of

title I of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1975 (2

U.S.C. 29a(a)).

Attest:

Clerk.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

75-64 

August 25, 1975 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041 Termination by Plan Administrator 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter asking the position of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") on the

payment of premiums on life insurance policies held by a pension trust during the 90 day period allowed PBGC under

Section 4041(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). 

Although the terms of the trust may provide otherwise, no distribution of trust assets pursuant to the plan termination

may be made before the expiration of the 90 day period under § 4040(a) of ERISA. Whether to pay premiums on life

insurance policies during the 90 day period is a decision that ultimately must be made by the plan administrator. PBGC

will permit the payment of premiums necessary to continue life insurance coverage until the assets are distributed. The

plan administrator should attempt to pay premiums only for the period of coverage until termination by arranging for pro

rata or other short-term premium arrangements. 

I hope this information is helpful. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
### Production Credit Associations
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

83-16 

July 12, 1983 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4021(b)(2) Plans Covered. Government Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter regarding coverage of the above pension plan (the "Plan") under Title IV of the

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). You asked whether the Plan is excluded from Title IV

coverage by Section 4021(b)(2) of ERISA. We have concluded that the Plan is not excluded from Title IV coverage by

that Section. 

Section 4021(b)(2) of ERISA excludes from Title IV coverage any plan "established and maintained for its

employees by the Government of the United States, by the government of any State or political subdivision thereof, or

by any agency or instrumentality of any of the foregoing. . . ." 

The facts as you represent them indicate that the Plan is maintained by a private entity rather than by a government

instrumentality. * * * Company * * * is a wholly-owned subsidiary of * * * Corporation, a private company. Pursuant

to a contract between * * * and the United States Department of Energy (the "DOE"), * * * operates government-owned

nuclear facilities at * * * in * * * State. All of * * * employees work at these facilities. The contract specifically

designates * * * as a contractor rather [*2] than as an instrumentality. * * * earns a profit from the contract and is

reimbursed by the DOE for its allowable expenses under the contract. Among these allowable expenses are employee

salaries and employer contributions to the Plan, only to the extent those salaries and contributions are attributable to work

performed under the contract. * * * can perform non-contract work with the DOE's approval. 

 With respect to the payment of benefits under the Plan, you have stated that if the DOE were to close its facilities

entirely, the contract provides for, as an allowable cost, the purchase of annuities from a private insurance carrier.

Neither the Plan nor the contract provides for any direct payment by the DOE of Plan benefits in the event they become

unavailable from other funding media. Moreover, the contract allows the DOE to indemnify and hold * * * harmless

only for those liabilities arising under the Plan which * * * has a legal obligation to pay subsequent to termination of the

Plan. If * * * has no liability under ERISA in connection with the Plan, the DOE will not be obligated to guarantee the

payment of benefits to Plan participants. Thus the contract clearly points [*3] out one circumstance under which the

DOE will not guarantee the payment of pension benefits in the event of Plan termination. 

On the basis of the information furnished us, we conclude that the Section 4021(b)(2) exclusion does not apply to

the Plan and, consequently, that the Plan is subject to the provisions of Title IV. 

Enclosed for your review is an explanation and copy of the PBGC's Administrative Review regulation, 29 C.F.R.

Part 2606. I trust this responds to your inquiry. If you have any questions please call * * * of my staff at (202) 254-4895.

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
# C_2014046EN.01000301.xml

| 18.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/3

---

Update of Annex II and of Tables 1 and 2 of Annex IIIb with respect to applicable euro values in accordance with Article 10a of Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, as amended

(2014/C 46/05)

ANNEX II

MAXIMUM AMOUNTS IN EURO OF USER CHARGES, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 7(7)

Annual

| | Maximum three axles | Minimum four axles |
| --- | --- | --- |
| EURO 0 | 1 381 | 2 315 |
| EURO I | 1 201 | 2 004 |
| EURO II | 1 045 | 1 743 |
| EURO III | 908 | 1 515 |
| EURO IV and less polluting | 826 | 1 378 |

Maximum three axles

Minimum four axles

EURO 0

1 381

2 315

EURO I

1 201

2 004

EURO II

1 045

1 743

EURO III

908

1 515

EURO IV and less polluting

826

1 378

Monthly and weekly

Maximum monthly and weekly rates are in proportion to the duration of the use made of the infrastructure.

Daily

The daily user charge is equal for all vehicle categories and amounts to EUR 12.

ANNEX IIIb

MAXIMUM WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXTERNAL-COST CHARGE

This Annex sets out the parameters to be used to calculate the maximum weighted average external-cost charge.

1.   Maximum cost of traffic-based air pollution

Table 1: Maximum chargeable air pollution cost

| Ccent/vehicle-kilometre | Suburban roads (including motorways) | Interurban roads (including motorways) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| EURO 0 | 16,6 | 12,5 |
| EURO I | 11,4 | 8,3 |
| EURO II | 9,4 | 7,3 |
| EURO III | 7,3 | 6,3 |
| EURO IV | 4,2 | 3,2 |
| EURO V
  after 31 December 2013 | 0 | 0 |
| 3,2 | 2,1 |
| EURO VI
  after 31 December 2017 | 0 | 0 |
| 2,1 | 1,1 |
| Less polluting than EURO VI | 0 | 0 |

Ccent/vehicle-kilometre

Suburban roads (including motorways)

Interurban roads (including motorways)

EURO 0

16,6

12,5

EURO I

11,4

8,3

EURO II

9,4

7,3

EURO III

7,3

6,3

EURO IV

4,2

3,2

EURO V

after 31 December 2013

0

0

3,2

2,1

EURO VI

after 31 December 2017

0

0

2,1

1,1

Less polluting than EURO VI

0

0

The values of Table 1 may be multiplied by a factor of up to 2 in mountain areas to the extent that it is justified by the gradient of roads, altitude and/or temperature inversions.

2.   Maximum cost of traffic-based noise pollution

Table 2: Maximum chargeable noise cost

| Ccent/vehicle-kilometre | Day | Night |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Suburban roads
  (including motorways) | 1,14 | 2,08 |
| Interurban roads
  (including motorways) | 0,21 | 0,32 |

Ccent/vehicle-kilometre

Day

Night

Suburban roads

(including motorways)

1,14

2,08

Interurban roads

(including motorways)

0,21

0,32

The values in Table 2 may be multiplied by a factor of up to 2 in mountain areas to the extent that it is justified by the gradient of roads, temperature inversions and/or amphitheatre effect of valleys.

---
#### BOLICK v. SUNBIRD AIRLINES, INC.

No. 11A90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 443

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 March 1990.
### [§2374. Renumbered §4024]