alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 170

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 13, 1999

Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 5.

Section 2(f)(1) of House Resolution 5, One Hundred

Sixth Congress, agreed to January 6, 1999, as amended, is

amended by striking ‘‘May 14, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘May 31,

1999’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 169.404 What will BIA do about a violation of a right-of-way grant? ( a ) In the absence of actions or proceedings described in § 169.403 (negotiated remedies), or if it is not appropriate for us to defer to the actions or proceedings, we will follow the procedures in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. We will consult with the tribe for tribal land or, where feasible, communicate with Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land, and determine whether a violation has occurred.
( b ) If we determine there has been a violation of the conditions of a grant, other than a violation of payment provisions covered by paragraph (c) of this section, we will promptly send the grantee a written notice of violation. ( 1 ) We will send a copy of the notice of violation to the tribe for tribal land, or provide constructive notice to Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land.
( 2 ) The notice of violation will advise the grantee that, within 10 business days of the receipt of a notice of violation, the grantee must: ( i ) Cure the violation and notify us, and the tribe for tribal land, in writing that the violation has been cured;
( ii ) Dispute our determination that a violation has occurred; or
( iii ) Request additional time to cure the violation.
( 3 ) The notice of violation may order the grantee to cease operations under the right-of-way grant.
( c ) A grantee's failure to pay compensation in the time and manner required by a right-of-way grant is a violation, and we will issue a notice of violation in accordance with this paragraph. ( 1 ) We will send the grantees a written notice of violation promptly following the date on which the payment was due.
( 2 ) We will send a copy of the notice of violation to the tribe for tribal land, or provide constructive notice to the Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land.
( 3 ) The notice of violation will require the grantee to provide adequate proof of payment.
( d ) The grantee will continue to be responsible for the obligations in the grant until the grant expires, or is terminated or cancelled, as well as any reclamation or other obligations that survive the end of the grant.
### §949g. Oaths

(a) In General.—(1) Before performing their respective duties in a military commission under this chapter, military judges, members, trial counsel, defense counsel, reporters, and interpreters shall take an oath to perform their duties faithfully.

(2) The form of the oath required by paragraph (1), the time and place of the taking thereof, the manner of recording thereof, and whether the oath shall be taken for all cases in which duties are to be performed or for a particular case, shall be as provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. The regulations may provide that—

(A) an oath to perform faithfully duties as a military judge, trial counsel, or defense counsel may be taken at any time by any judge advocate or other person certified to be qualified or competent for the duty; and

(B) if such an oath is taken, such oath need not again be taken at the time the judge advocate or other person is detailed to that duty.

(b) Witnesses.—Each witness before a military commission under this chapter shall be examined on oath.

(c) Oath Defined.—In this section, the term "oath" includes an affirmation.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2587.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 949g, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2613, related to oaths, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DAVID BLAKE JOHNSTON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1860 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) )

Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 30, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Brian A. Iten, Judge. Ronald J. Kurpiers, II of Kurpiers Law Firm, PA, Tampa, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Holbrook, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 923]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), rendered July 21, 2003 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree.

Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to a superior *1130court information charging him with the crime of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree. Under the terms of the plea agreement, defendant received a sentence of 12 years in prison, followed by five years of postrelease supervision, and waived his right to appeal. He now appeals.

Counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and appellate counsel’s brief, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and the application to be relieved of his assignment is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Legal Resources 
-  Technical Updates 
-  Technical Update 08-1: PBGC Extension of ERISA Section 40... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Technical Update 08-1: PBGC Extension of ERISA section 4010 Reporting Deadline

February 21, 2008

Employers maintaining defined benefit plans with large amounts of underfunding must submit financial and actuarial information annually to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. (See section 4010 of ERISA and 29 CFR Part 4010.) Reports are due 105 days after the end of the "Information Year" (generally the calendar year).

The PBGC is granting an automatic one-day extension for reporting by controlled groups whose 105-day reporting period includes February 29, 2008. For example, for a calendar year filer, this Technical Update extends the filing deadline from Monday, April 14, 2008 (the 105th day after the end of the Information Year) to Tuesday, April 15, 2008. Note that, as always, existing rules extend a filing date that falls on a weekend or Federal holiday to the next day that is not a weekend or Federal holiday.

Filers do not have to make a request to take advantage of this automatic extension of the due date. This extension applies only to 4010 filings, and not to any other PBGC reporting or disclosure requirements.

See Technical Update 07-2 for guidance on (1) how changes made by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 apply to the determination of funding-related amounts for purposes of 4010 filings; and (2) the effective date of Pension Protection Act of 2006 change to ERISA section 4010.
# C_2006224EN.01004102.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/41

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2006 — Free Trade Foods v Commission

(Case T-202/01) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Action for damages - Sugar qualifying as EC/OCT originating products - Safeguard measure - Applicant's failure to proceed - No need to adjudicate)

(2006/C 224/89)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Free Trade Foods NV (Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles) (represented by: M. Slotboom and N. Helder, lawyers, initially and then by M. Slotboom)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. van Rijn, Agent)

Defendant:

Party intervening in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, Agent)

Party intervening in support of the defendant:

Re:

First, an application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1325/2001 of 29 June 2001 providing for the continued application of safeguard measures with regard to imports of sugar sector products with EC/OCT originating status from the overseas countries and territories for the period 1 July to 1 December 2001 (OJ 2001 L 177, p. 57) and, second, an application for compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant following the adoption of the contested regulation.

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on this action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on this action.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those of the defendant. The Kingdom of Spain must bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those of the defendant. The Kingdom of Spain must bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 27.10.2001.

1

---
### §986. Policy regarding identification of gender or personal pronouns in official correspondence

The Secretary of Defense may not require or prohibit a member of the armed forces or a civilian employee of the Department of Defense to identify the gender or personal pronouns of such member or employee in any official correspondence of the Department.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §522(b), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 249.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 986, added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1071(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–275; amended Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title X, §1048(c)(3), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1226; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1062, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2056, prohibited the Department of Defense from granting or renewing security clearances for certain persons, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1072(b)(1), (3), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 329, 330, effective Jan. 1, 2008.
H. Res. 558

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 19, 2000.

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Paul Coverdell, a Senator

from the State of Georgia.

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of

the deceased.

Resolved, That a committee be appointed on the part of

the House to join a committee appointed on the part of the

Senate to attend the funeral.

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased Senator.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 8, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Commerce Bank & Trust Holding Company,*                     Topeka, Kansas; to retain 22.98 percent of the voting shares of Financial Institution Technologies, Topeka, Kansas, and thereby indirectly engage in data processing activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(14)(i) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 16, 2011.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-3829 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FY ... interagency research anddevelopment priorities.**
 
SuDoc Number:PREX 2.4/3:R 31/

Item Number:0854-D-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001050252
 
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
 
April 15, 2020
#### § 256.29 Can HIP resources be combined with other available resources?

Yes. HIP resources may be supplemented with other available resources (*e.g.*, in-kind assistance; tribal or housing authority; and any other leveraging mechanism identified in § 256.3(d)) to increase the number of HIP recipients.
§ 44.102 Does this part affect existing tribal rights? This part does not: ( a ) Affect in any way the sovereign immunity from suit enjoyed by Indian tribes;
( b ) Terminate or change the trust responsibility of the United States to any Indian tribe or individual Indian;
( c ) Require an Indian tribe to apply for a grant; or
( d ) Impede awards by any other Federal agency to any Indian tribe or tribal organization to administer any Indian program under any other law.
SERVED MAY 5, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GOJET AIRLINES, LLC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10CE0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0025 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GOJET AIRLINES, LLC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10CE0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0190 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule: 

... On or before August 1, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a 

discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution 

in a timely manner... 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

commencing August 25,26 and 27,2010, inclusive; U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 

9.170, Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South lO"" Street, St. Louis, MO. 

63102.^ 

' Counsel should agree on whether to try the cases concurrently or sequentially. The court has no 

preference. Absent agreement, 2010-0025 will be tried first, 2010-0190 tried second. 
Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties 

should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachments - Service List 
FAA Docket Nos. CP10CE0003 & 

CP10CE0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Mr. Richard A. Leach 

GoJet Airlines, LLC, Respondent 

11495 Navaid Road, Suite 303 

St. Louis, MO 63044 

David J. A. Hayes III, Respondent's Counsel 

Vice-President & General Counsel 

Trans States Holdings, Inc. 

11495 Navaid Road 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

TEL: 314-222-4316 

FAX: 314-222-4311 

David B. Kessler, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3763 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-3 66-213 9 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# C_2006212EN.01002001.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 26 June 2006 — Interboves GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-277/06)

(2006/C 212/34)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Interboves GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Does point 48.7(a) of Chapter VII of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC (1) define the basic conditions for transport by sea so that, in principle, — provided that the conditions laid down in points 48.3 and 48.4 of Chapter VII of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC, except for journey times and rest periods, are met — the journey times by road before and after transport by sea are not interconnected, even where animals are being transported on so-called roll-on/roll-off ferries? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does point 48.7(a) of Chapter VII of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC (1) define the basic conditions for transport by sea so that, in principle, — provided that the conditions laid down in points 48.3 and 48.4 of Chapter VII of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC, except for journey times and rest periods, are met — the journey times by road before and after transport by sea are not interconnected, even where animals are being transported on so-called roll-on/roll-off ferries?

1

| 2. | Does point 48.7(b) of Chapter VII of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC include a special provision for so-called roll-on/roll-off ferries operating in the Community which applies alongside or in addition to the conditions laid down in point 48.4(a) of Chapter VII of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC, so that a new maximum journey time of 29 hours (cf. point 48.4(d) of Chapter VII of the Annex to the Directive) does not commence after arrival of the ferry at the port of destination (the animals having instead to be rested for 12 hours) only if the journey time at sea is such that the voyage has exceeded the general scheme of points 48.2 to 48.4 of Chapter VII of the Annex to the Directive — namely 29 hours in accordance with point 48.4(d)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does point 48.7(b) of Chapter VII of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC include a special provision for so-called roll-on/roll-off ferries operating in the Community which applies alongside or in addition to the conditions laid down in point 48.4(a) of Chapter VII of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC, so that a new maximum journey time of 29 hours (cf. point 48.4(d) of Chapter VII of the Annex to the Directive) does not commence after arrival of the ferry at the port of destination (the animals having instead to be rested for 12 hours) only if the journey time at sea is such that the voyage has exceeded the general scheme of points 48.2 to 48.4 of Chapter VII of the Annex to the Directive — namely 29 hours in accordance with point 48.4(d)?

cf.

---

(1)  OJ L 340, p. 17.

1

---
§ 39.700 What is the purpose of this subpart? ( a ) This subpart covers how transportation mileage and funds for schools are calculated under the ISEP transportation program. The program funds transportation of students from home to school and return.
( b ) To use this part effectively, a school should: ( 1 ) Determine its eligibility for funds using the provisions of §§ 39.702 through 39.708;
( 2 ) Calculate its transportation miles using the provisions of §§ 39.710 and 39.711; and
( 3 ) Submit the required reports as required by §§ 39.721 and 39.722.