alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006224EN.01002202.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio (Italy) lodged on 3 July 2006 — Telecom Italia SpA v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Ministero delle Comunicazioni

(Case C-296/06)

(2006/C 224/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Telecom Italia SpA

Applicant:

Defendants: Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Ministero delle Comunicazioni

Defendants:

Question referred

Is Article 20(3) of Law No 448/1998 in conjunction with Article 4(9) of Law No 249/1997 compatible with Articles 11, 22 and 25 of Directive 97/13/EC? (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ 1997 L 117, p. 15.

1

---
#### § 214.27 Changes in regulations.

The regulations in this part are subject to change or alteration at any time by the Secretary of the Interior.
Exhibit 10.2
​


November 13, 2021
​
Renato Giger
***@canoo.com
Re:  Salary Adjustment
Dear Renato,
This is to confirm your salary adjustment effective 11/16/2021.  Your new monthly salary is $12,000. You will continue to report to Tony Aquilla, Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors.
​
Except as modified by this revised offer, the terms and conditions of your original offer letter shall remain in full force and effect, including, without limitation, the at-will status of your employment.
Thank you for all your contributions at Canoo.
Best Regards,
​
/s/ Kate Lengyel
​
Kate Lengyel
Chief Human Resources Officer
​
Acknowledged & Agreed:
​
	/s/ Renato Giger
	​

	Renato Giger
	​



​
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 272 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        August 3, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2031) to provide for injunctive relief in Federal district court to 
enforce State laws relating to the interstate transportation of intoxicating 
liquor. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule for a period not to exceed two hours. It shall be in order 
to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-
minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in 
the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of 
the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 
minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any 
amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 215.0 Definitions. The following expressions, wherever used in the regulations in this part or leases thereunder, shall have the meaning designated in this section: ( a ) *Superintendent.* The term “superintendent” shall mean any person in charge of the Quapaw Indian Agency, or having supervision under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior of the Indian restricted and trust allotted lands thereunder.
( b ) *Allottee.* The term “allottee” shall mean any Indian to whom land has been allotted, or any Indian owner of land or interest therein as an heir or devisee.
( c ) *Incompetent Indian.* The term “incompetent Indian” or “incompetent” shall mean any Indian who has been declared by the Secretary of the Interior to be incompetent to improve or manage his restricted or trust lands properly or with benefit to himself. The term shall also include any Indian who is a minor and any Indian who is a legal incompetent under the laws of the State. The term shall also apply to any Indian who is in fact incompetent, and the question of whether an Indian is competent or incompetent at the time of making a lease of his restricted or trust Indian lands is one for the Secretary of the Interior to determine.
( d ) *Lessee.* The term “lessee,” except where otherwise modified or limited in the regulations in this part, shall mean any person, firm, or corporation, their legal representatives, heirs, or assigns, to whom a lead and zinc mining lease has been made by or on behalf of Indians under the provisions of the regulations in this part.
( e ) *Lessor.* The term “lessor,” except where otherwise modified or limited in the regulations in this part, shall mean any Indian owning or having any interest in restricted or trust allotted any inherited lands under the supervision of the Quapaw Indian Agency, by or for whom a lease has been executed pursuant to the regulations in this part.
( f ) *Leased lands.* The terms “leased lands,” “leased premises,” or “leased tract” shall mean any leased restricted or trust lands within and under jurisdiction of the Quapaw Indian Agency allotted to or inherited by an Indian.
( g ) *Mining operations.* The term “mining operation” or “operations,” except where otherwise modified or limited in the regulations in this part or in leases thereunder shall mean actual drilling, mining, or construction on the leased lands.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4095]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,949]


Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Coporate Headquaters/Hard 
Drive Development Division, Lake Forest, CA; Notice of Negative 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On October 7, 2010, the Department of Labor issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Corporate 
Headquarters/Hard Drive Development Division, Lake Forest, California 
(Western Digital Technologies). The Department's Notice was published 
in the Federal Register on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 65517). The subject 
workers supply engineering (development) services in support of hard 
drive (also known as disk drive) manufacturing.
    The initial negative determination was based on the Department's 
findings that that the subject firm did not increase imports of like or 
directly competitive services and did not shift to a foreign country 
the supply of these services. The investigation also revealed that the 
subject firm does not supply services that were directly used in the 
production of an article by a firm that employed a worker group 
eligible to apply for TAA. Because the services were supplied 
internally, no customer survey was conducted.
    The request for reconsideration alleges that increased imports of 
articles that were produced directly using the services supplied by the 
subject workers contributed importantly to separations at the subject 
firm.
    Information obtained during the reconsideration investigation 
confirmed that, during the relevant period, the workers' firm did not 
shift to a foreign country the supply of services like or directly 
competitive with the engineering services supplied by the workers nor 
has there has been an acquisition by the subject firm from a foreign 
country of like or directly competitive services; that the subject firm 
did not increase services like or directly competitive with the 
engineering services supplied by the workers; and the subject firm did 
not increase imports of articles that were produced directly using 
services supplied by the subject workers.

Conclusion

    After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative 
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
for workers and former workers of Western Digital Technologies, Inc., 
Corporate Headquarters/Hard Drive Development Division, Lake Forest, 
California.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on this 4th day of February, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-4095 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2006154EN.01002201.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/22

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 April 2006 — ATI Technologies v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) — Asociación de Técnicos de Informatica (ATI)

(Case T -377/03) (1)

1

(2006/C 154/53)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 21, 24.1.2004.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 492 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 9, 2000.
Whereas the foundation of American freedom and democracy is a strong, effective 
        system of education in which every child can learn in a safe and 
        nurturing environment;
Whereas a first-rate education system depends on a partnership between parents, 
        principals, teachers, and children;
Whereas much of the success of our Nation during the American Century is the 
        result of the hard work and dedication of teachers across the land;
Whereas, in addition to their families, knowledgeable and skillful teachers can 
        have a profound impact on a child's early development and future 
        success;
Whereas, while many people spend their lives building careers, teachers spend 
        their careers building lives;
Whereas our Nation's teachers serve our children beyond the call of duty as 
        coaches, mentors, and advisors without regard to fame or fortune; and
Whereas across this land nearly three million men and women experience the joys 
        of teaching young minds the virtues of reading, writing, and arithmetic: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors and recognizes the unique and important achievements of 
        America's teachers; and
            (2) urges all Americans to take a moment to thank and pay tribute to 
        our Nation's teachers.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mario Mannino, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 916]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 4, 2004 *(People v Mannino,*11 AD3d 485 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered March 30, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Krausman and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Organization and Management of Cooperative Housing Associations (with Model Bylaws)

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Organization and Management of Cooperative Housing Associations (with Model Bylaws) : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 608*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										October 1934,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4130,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §7284. Medal of honor: duplicate medal

A person awarded a medal of honor shall, upon written application of that person, be issued, without charge, one duplicate medal of honor with ribbons and appurtenances. Such duplicate medal of honor shall be marked, in such manner as the Secretary of the Army may determine, as a duplicate or for display purposes only.

(Added Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §553(a)(1)(A), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1115, §3754; renumbered §7284, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(11), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3754 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15 , 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 17 -00705- CV

TRIANGLE CAPITAL PROPERTIES, LLC, ROYAL TEXAS, LLC, MOHAMMED HADI RAHMAN, YESENIA ZUMAYA, CAJUN GLOBAL, LLC,

AND CAJUN OPERATING COMPANY, Appellants

V.
HUGOLINA GUERRERO DE GARZON, RAYMUNDO GARZON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF K.G., Y.G. AND B.G. (MINORS), JOSELIN DAMIAN GONZALEZ, SALVADOR DAMIAN CORTEZ, AND

LORENA DAMIAN CORTEZ, Appellees

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-16506

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from an order signed August 20, 2017. On May 4, 2018, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
# C_2006178EN.01002902.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 4 May 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Oristano (Italy)) — Ignazio Medda v Banco di Napoli SpA, Regione autonoma della Sardegna

(Case C-285/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 178/49)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 28.8.2004.

1

---
§ 36.70 What terms do I need to know? The following definitions apply to this subpart: *Behavioral health professional* means a State licensed or State certified Social Worker, School Counselor, Drug and Alcohol Counselor, School Psychologist, or School Psychometrist responsible for coordinating a broad range of needs including: ( 1 ) Support groups;
( 2 ) Individual counseling;
( 3 ) Crisis intervention;
( 4 ) Preventive activities; and
( 5 ) Coordination of referrals and outside services with appropriate providers.
*Behavioral Health Program* means a homeliving based service designed to decrease barriers to learning or increase positive, personal well-being by: ( 1 ) Providing early intervention services, coordinating crisis intervention and prevention services;
( 2 ) Promoting a positive social and emotional environment;
( 3 ) Reducing the incidence of problems; and
( 4 ) Referring students with behavioral needs that require professional medical care to an appropriate residential care facility.
*Behavioral health services* means the services provided by a school behavioral health program as defined in this section.
*Homeliving Manager* means the employee responsible for direct supervision of the homeliving program staff and students.
*Homeliving Program* means a program that provides room and board in a boarding school or dormitory to residents who are either: ( 1 ) Enrolled in and are current members of a public school in the community in which they reside; or
( 2 ) Members of the instructional program in the same boarding school in which they are counted as residents and: ( i ) Are officially enrolled in the residential program of a Bureau-operated or funded school; and
( ii ) Are actually receiving a homeliving program provided to all students who are provided room and board in a boarding school or dormitory.
*Homeliving Program Staff* means the employee(s) responsible for direct supervision of students in the homeliving area.
*Homeliving Supervisor* means the employee with overall administrative responsibility for supervising students, programs, and personnel in the homeliving area.
**EXHIBIT 32.1 – President Certification**

 

**SATELLITE NEWSPAPERS CORP.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Satellite Newspapers Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy Piceni, President and chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Roy Piceni

Roy Piceni, President

And chairman of the Board of Directors

 

August 21, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Satellite Newspapers Corp. and will be retained by Satellite Newspapers Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of ITXC Corp. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the “Report”), I, Tom Evslin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated resultof operations of the Company for the periods presented. |

Dated: August 14, 2003

|   | */s/ TOM EVSLIN*                                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                      |
|   | **Tom Evslin Chief Executive Officer of ITXC Corp.** |

This certification has been furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
H. Res. 307

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 5, 1999.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2606) making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All

points of order against the conference report and against its

consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.