alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1098
GUAN EN YE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: July 16, 2008 Decided: July 30, 2008 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Romben Aquino, FERRO & CUCCIA, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Mona Maria Yousif, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Guan En Ye, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying to sua sponte reopen his removal proceedings. We lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s discretionary authority to sua sponte reopen proceedings. See Tamenut v. Mukasey , 521 F.3d 1000, 1004 (8th Cir. 2008) (collecting cases). We deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 1, 11/2013



### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 9/19/2014 Sample Number: 143221-001 Date Collected:09/09/2014 08:47 Date Received:9/9/2014 

### WWTP Outlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 27.6 5 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 2 09/16/2014 

### Sample Number: 143221-002 Date Collected:09/09/2014 08:41 Date Received:9/9/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 26.0 5 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 2 09/16/2014 

### Sample Number: 143221-003 Date Collected:09/09/2014 08:38 Date Received:9/9/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 30.1 5 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 2 09/16/2014 

### Sample Number: 143221-004 Date Collected:09/09/2014 08:49 Date Received:9/9/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 947 20 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 8 09/16/2014 

### Sample Number: 143221-005 Date Collected:09/09/2014 08:51 Date Received:9/9/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 710 20 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 8 09/16/2014 

### Sample Number: 143221-006 Date Collected:09/09/2014 08:54 Date Received:9/9/2014 

### WWTP Inlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 191000 10000 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 4000 09/16/2014

Amos Plant, 143221 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 9/19/2014

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Dave Conover, Senior Chemist Email dpconover@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4219 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4219

Amos Plant, 143221 Page 2 of 2
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications


I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of the COMM 2012-LC4 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic
reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their
obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital
Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic
Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant,
and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.



        Dated: March 31, 2017


        /s/ Helaine M. Kaplan


        President
        (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****United States of America v.Richard Pinedo, defendant: case 1:18-cr-00024-DLF.**
 
Criminal information | Pleaagreement | Statement of the offense
 
SuDoc Number:J 1.128:P 65/
Item Number:0717-A-65 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001046337
 
April 9, 2018
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00295

- CV

IN RE WILLIAM SULLIV AN RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of man damus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. 2 Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).

2 The relator complains that the respondent has failed to hold a hearing on his pro se application for writ of habeas corpus bond reduction, but the trial court clerk has indicated that relator is still represented by appointed counsel and that

there is no motion to wit hdraw on file. See Ex parte Bohannan , 350 S.W.3d 116, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (noting that when an applicant is represented by counsel, he is not entitled to hybrid representation, and the court can disregard his pro se submissions and take no acti on on them).2

DELIVERED: July 25, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Enterprises Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Neils Reijers
---------------------------------
Neils Reijers
Chief Financial Officer
December 22, 2003

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 ("Section  906"), or other document  authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been  provided  to  Satellite  Enterprises  Corp.  and will be  retained  by
Satellite  Enterprises  Corp.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2006244EN.01002401.xml

| 11.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4369 — Macquarie/Corona)

(2006/C 244/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 September2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4369. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4369. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 56 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 56

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Commerce in the 
                      One Hundred Sixth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

 Mr. Bliley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Commerce in the 
                      One Hundred Sixth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Commerce (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $15,537,415 for the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,597,758 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1999, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2000; and
            (2) not more than $7,939,657 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2000, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2001.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
# DATA BOOK LISTING

# GLANCE

# S-1

# S-2

# S-3

# S-4

# S-5

# S-6

# S-7

# S-8

# S-9

# S-10

# S-11

# S-12

# S-13

# S-14

# S-15

# S-16

# S-17

# S-18

# S-19

# S-20

# S-21

# S-22

# S-23

# S-24

# S-25

# S-26

# S-27

# S-28

# S-29

# S-30

# S-31

# S-32

# S-33

# S-34

# S-35

# S-36

# S-37 

# S-38

# S-39

# S-40

# S-41

# S-42

# S-43

# S-44

# S-45

# S-46

# S-47

# S-48

# S-49

# S-50

# S-51

# S-52

# S-53

# M-1

# M-2

# M-3

# M-4

# M-5

# M-6

# M-7

# M-8

# M-9

# M-10

# M-11

# M-12

# M-13

# M-14

# M-15

# M-16

# M-17
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 407 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      January 31, 2000.
    Resolved, That at a time designated by the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, official photographs of the House may be taken while the House 
is in actual session. Payment for the costs associated with taking, preparing, 
and distributing such photographs may be made from the applicable accounts of 
the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Guidance Document Database 
-  Sale of Assets 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# sale of assets

                  -  Opinion Letter 81-19
Addresses the applicability of the “sale of assets exception: to the construction industry complete withdrawal rules. 
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 93-03
Addresses which of two limitations on withdrawal liability applies—one applicable to a dissolving or liquidating employer, the other applicable to an employer that sold its assets to an unrelated party—when an employer satisfies the prerequisites for both.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 85-32
Addresses whether an employer that has withdrawn from a multiemployer plan may be relieved of withdrawal liability by a subsequent sale of assets.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 88-01
Addresses the method of calculating the withdrawal liability of a purchaser of the assets of an unrelated contributing employer. 
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 87-02
Addresses the definition of the term “assets” for the purpose of the sale-of-assets exception to withdrawal. 
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 88-07
Addresses the “unrelated party” requirement for the sale of assets exception to withdrawal liability.  
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 88-02
Addresses applicability to construction industry employers of the sale-of-assets limitation on withdrawal liability. 
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 92-01
Addresses the calculation of withdrawal liability in a situation where several members of a controlled group have an obligation to contribute to the same multiemployer pension plan and are sold or liquidated in a series of transactions. 
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 85-17
Addresses whether a seller and purchaser can retroactively bring a sale of assets within the coverage of the law by posting an appropriate bond and by amending the sales contract. 
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 86-06
Considers the timing of the bond/escrow requirement in a sale of assets and requests that PBGC grant a waiver of the bond/escrow and contract language requirements. 
-               document            
 

-  1 
-  2 
-   Next  
-   Last
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00365

- CV

Ex parte L.C. §

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (D371

- E

- 12323

- 16)

September 28 , 2017

Opinion by Justice Gabriel



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appea l in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the trial court ’s order is

reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court to grant Appellant L.C.’s

petition and to enter an order directing expunction.

I t is further ordered that appellee The State of Texas shall bear the costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
# C_2006224EN.01000101.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/1

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Gesellschaft für Antriebstechnik mbH & Co. KG (GAT) v Lamellen und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs KG (LuK)

(Case C-4/03) (1)

1

(Brussels Convention - Article 16(4) - Proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents - Exclusive jurisdiction of the court of the place of deposit or registration - Declaratory action to establish no infringement - Question of the patent's validity raised indirectly)

(2006/C 224/01)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gesellschaft für Antriebstechnik mbH & Co. KG (GAT)

Applicant:

Defendant: Lamellen und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs KG (LuK)

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Article 16(4) of the Brussels Convention — Exclusive jurisdiction ‘in proceedings concerned with the ... validity of patents’ — Whether that covers a declaratory action to establish that a patent has (or has not) been infringed, in the course of which one party pleads that the patent is invalid

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Article 16(4) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, as last amended by the Convention of 29 November 1996 on the Accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden, is to be interpreted as meaning that the rule of exclusive jurisdiction laid down therein concerns all proceedings relating to the registration or validity of a patent, irrespective of whether the issue is raised by way of an action or a plea in objection.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 8.3.2003.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-22-2000
<CASH>                                          15,803
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,225)
<INVENTORY>                                    764,816
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               907,532
<PP&E>                                         559,906
<DEPRECIATION>                               (163,949)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,353,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          536,533
<BONDS>                                        200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,353,749
<SALES>                                        677,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               677,582
<CGS>                                          418,607
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               239,791
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,533
<INCOME-TAX>                                       579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                954
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       954
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Genmed Holding Corp. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Treasurer, and the principal financial officer
      of
      the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                September 19, 2008
            /s/
                Erwin R. BouwensErwin
                R. Bouwens,
              Chief
                Executive Officer and President