alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

KENNETH T. DEPUTY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) C.A. No. N12C-05-163 MMJ

)

)

DR. J. CONLAN, )

)

Defendant. )

Submitted: March 26, 2015

Decided: April 1, 2015

On Plaintiff Kenneth T. Deputy’s

Motion for Appointment of Counsel

DENIED

ORDER

Kenneth T. Deputy, Pro Se, Plaintiff

Daniel A. Griffith, Esquire, Scott F. Wilcox, Esquire, Whiteford Taylor & Preston

LLC, Attorneys for Defendant

JOHNSTON, J. 
1Vick v. Dep’t. of Corr, 1986 WL 8003, at *2 (Del. Super.).

2

Id.

3

Id. at *1.

4

See Jenkins v. Dover Police Comm’r, 2002 WL 663912 (Del. Super.).

By Memorandum Opinion dated June 5, 2014, the Court denied Plaintiff’s

fourth Motion for Appointment of Counsel. This was Plaintiff’s sixth request for

appointment of an attorney at State expense.

Plaintiff has again moved for appointment of counsel. Plaintiff states that he

has made numerous unsuccessful attempts to obtain private counsel on a contingency

basis. 

The Delaware Superior Court has the “inherent authority to appoint counsel for

an indigent person in a civil suit.”1 The Court will only appoint counsel if it is

demonstrated that the prisoner does not have meaningful access to the courts by other

alternatives.2 Meaningful access has been interpreted to mean “either access to an

adequate law library or legal assistance in the preparation of complaints, appeals,

petitions, etc., though the State is vested with discretion to select the method by

which to implement this constitutional guarantee.”3 The State rarely appoints counsel

to prisoners for civil claims.4

Plaintiff has access to the prison law library. He successfully appealed the

dismissal of his 2007 lawsuit to the Delaware Supreme Court. There is nothing in the
record to show Plaintiff is being denied “meaningful access” to the Courts.

Plaintiff’s instant motion again fails to demonstrate the need for courtappointed counsel at State expense. Deputy has not provided any new or different

facts or law in support of his motion.

Plaintiff argues that his case is “clearly meritorious” because it “has been

scheduled for trial twice..”. Cases are given trial dates as a matter of course. A trial

date is by no means an evaluation of the merits of the cause of action.

There is no question that Plaintiff would benefit from the assistance of counsel.

Representation by an attorney is virtually always beneficial for every litigant.

However, civil plaintiffs are not entitled to appointment of legal counsel at State

expense. The State simply does not have the resources to supply civil litigants with

attorneys, regardless of the purported merits of the case. Further, any plaintiff who

cannot find a private attorney to represent the plaintiff in a personal injury case,

should seriously consider whether the claim is financially and practically viable.

THEREFORE, Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel is hereby

DENIED. THE COURT WILL NOT CONSIDER ANY FURTHER MOTIONS

OR REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEGAL COUNSEL.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

_/s/ Mary M. Johnston_____________

The Honorable Mary M. Johnston
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Edward L. Pierce, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 of BindView Development
Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: December 20, 2004  /s/ EDWARD L. PIERCEEdward L. Pierce

Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1592-1593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2010-0039]


National Poultry Improvement Plan; General Conference Committee 
Meeting

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are giving notice of a meeting of the General Conference 
Committee of the National Poultry Improvement Plan.

DATES: The General Conference Committee meeting will be held on January 
26, 2011, from 1:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Georgia World Congress 
Center, 285 Andrew Young International Boulevard NW., Atlanta, GA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Andrew R. Rhorer, Senior 
Coordinator, National Poultry Improvement Plan, VS, APHIS, 1498 
Klondike Road, Suite 101, Conyers, GA 30094-5104; (770) 922-3496.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The General Conference Committee (the

[[Page 1593]]

Committee) of the National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP), 
representing cooperating State agencies and poultry industry members, 
serves an essential function by acting as a liaison between the poultry 
industry and the Department in matters pertaining to poultry health. 
The Committee meets to discuss significant poultry health issues and 
makes recommendations to improve the NPIP program.
    Topics for discussion at the upcoming meeting include:
    1. Salmonella methodology.
    2. Approval of rapid assays.
    3. FDA equivalency.
    4. NPIP database.
    The meeting will be open to the public. However, due to time 
constraints, the public will not be allowed to participate in the 
discussions during the meeting. Written statements on meeting topics 
may be filed with the Committee before or after the meeting by sending 
them to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 
Written statements may also be filed at the meeting. Please refer to 
Docket No. APHIS-2010-0039 when submitting your statements.
    This notice of meeting is given pursuant to section 10 of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2).

    Done in Washington, DC, this 5th day of January 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-346 Filed 1-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
§ 48.117 What will the Bureau do about a violation of a lease? ( a ) If the Bureau determines there has been a violation of the conditions of a lease, it will promptly send the lessee and any surety and mortgagee a notice of violation, by certified mail, return receipt requested. ( 1 ) The notice of violation will advise the lessee that, within 10 business days of the receipt of a notice of violation, the lessee must: ( i ) Cure the violation and notify the Bureau in writing that the violation has been cured;
( ii ) Dispute the determination that a violation has occurred; or
( iii ) Request additional time to cure the violation.
( 2 ) The notice of violation may order the lessee to cease operations under the lease.
( b ) A lessee's failure to pay compensation in the time and manner required by the lease is a violation of the lease, and the Bureau will issue a notice of violation in accordance with this section requiring the lessee to provide adequate proof of payment.
( c ) The lessee and its sureties will continue to be responsible for the obligations in the lease until the lease expires, or is terminated or cancelled.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInfluence of Shear Stiffness Degradation on Crack Paths in Uni-Directional Composite LaminatesInfluence of shear stiffness degradation in an element, due to damage, on crack paths in uni-directional laminates has been demonstrated. A new shear stiffness degradation approach to improve crack path prediction has been developed and implemented in an ABAQUS/Explicit frame work using VUMAT. Three progressive failure analysis models, built-in ABAQUS (TradeMark), original COmplete STress Reduction (COSTR) and the modified COSTR damage models have been utilized in this study to simulate crack paths in five unidirectional notched laminates, 15deg, 30deg, 45deg, 60deg and 75deg under uniaxial tension load. Results such as crack paths and load vs. edge displacement curves are documented in this report. Modified COSTR damage model shows better accuracy in predicting crack paths in all the uni-directional laminates compared to the ABAQUS (TradeMark) and the original COSTR damage models.Document ID20170007245Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSatyanarayana, Arunkumar*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Bogert, Phil B.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 2, 2017Publication DateJuly 1, 2017Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-2017-219641NF1676L-27195L-20823Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 826611.04.07.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170007245.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### In the Matter of Amanda L. and Others, Infants. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Amy R., Also Known as Amy L., Also Known as Amy P., Also Known as Amy G., Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 738]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Patricia A. Maxwell, J.), entered June 13, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, inter alia, terminated the parental rights of respondent and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Family Court. Present—Scudder, J.E, Kehoe, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 252 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 16, 1999.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable George E. Brown, Jr., a Representative from the State of California.
    Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the House as the Speaker may 
designate, together with such Members of the Senate as may be joined, be 
appointed to attend the funeral.
    Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be authorized and directed 
to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these 
resolutions and that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid out 
of the contingent fund of the House.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 161.206 What must a permittee do to protect livestock from exposure to disease? In accordance with applicable law, permittees must: ( a ) Vaccinate livestock;
( b ) Treat all livestock exposed to or infected with contagious or infectious diseases; and
( c ) Restrict the movement of exposed or infected livestock.
### §7831. Custody of departmental records and property

The Secretary of the Army has custody and charge of all books, records, papers, furniture, fixtures, and other property under the lawful control of the executive part of the Department of the Army.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 272, §4831; renumbered §7831, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4831 | 5:191. | R.S. 217. |

The words "under the lawful control of the executive part of the Department of the Army" are substituted for the words "appertaining to the Department".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4831 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About PBGC 
-  Annual Performance & Financial Reports 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Annual Performance & Financial Reports

                          - **2023 Annual Performance & Financial Report**                              - 2023 Actuarial Report
                            - 2023 Annual Report Transmittal Letters 
                          - **2022 Annual Performance & Financial Report**                              - 2022 Actuarial Report
                            - 2022 Annual Report Transmittal Letters 
                          - **2021 Annual Performance & Financial Report**                              - 2021 Actuarial Report
                            - 2021 Annual Report Transmittal Letters 
                          - **2020 Annual Performance & Financial Report**                              - 2020 Actuarial Report
                            - 2020 Annual Report Transmittal Letters 
                          - **2019 Annual Performance & Financial Report**                              - 2019 Actuarial Report 
                          - **2018 Annual Performance & Financial Report**                              - 2018 Actuarial Report 
                          - **2017 Annual Performance & Financial Report**                              - 2017 Actuarial Report 
                          - **2016 Annual Performance & Financial Report**                              - 2016 Actuarial Report 

August 29, 2023

##           Reports      

Annual Performance & Financial Reports

Budget, Performance & Planning

ERISA 4010 Reports

FOIA Annual & Quarterly Reports

Multiemployer 5-Year Reports

Pension Insurance Modeling System (PIMS) Reports

Projections Reports

Reports Archives

##           Office of Inspector General       

Management's Response to the OIG Semiannual Report to Congress

OIG Audits

OIG Investigative Reports
#### Richard Heffron, Respondent, v. New York City Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously, affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Miller, JJ.
#### § 39.210 When must a school drop a student from its membership?

If a student is absent for 10 consecutive school days, the school must drop that student from the membership for ISEP purposes of that school on the 11th day.
Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMI Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig H. Stevenson, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.
|



|Date: | November 9, 2005 | By:                       | /s/Craig H. Stevenson,
	      Jr.
|----- | ---------------- | ------------------------- | ---------------------------------
|      |                  |                           |                                  
|      |                  | Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.  
|      |                  | Chairman of the Board and
|      |                  | Chief Executive Officer  

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon
request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9743-9744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[T-1-2011]


Foreign-Trade Zone Subzone 22-- Chicago, IL, Temporary/Interim 
Manufacturing Authority, Baxter Healthcare Corporation (Pharmaceutical 
and Biological Product Manufacturing), Notice of Approval

    On January 18, 2011, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board filed an application submitted by the Illinois 
International Port District, grantee of FTZ 22, requesting temporary/
interim manufacturing (T/IM) authority, on behalf of Baxter Healthcare 
Corporation (Baxter) to manufacture pharmaceutical and biological 
intravenous (I.V.) products under FTZ procedures within FTZ 22--Site 
21, in Round Lake, Illinois.

[[Page 9744]]

    The application was processed in accordance with T/IM procedures, 
as authorized by FTZ Board Orders 1347 (69 FR 52857, 8/30/04) and 1480 
(71 FR 55422, 9/22/06). The Baxter facility and activity in question 
had initially been proposed to the FTZ Board for subzone authority, 
including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (FTZ 
Doc. 60-2010, 75 FR 65448, 10/25/2010). To enable expedited authority 
for Baxter in the context of the FTZ Board's recent approval of the 
reorganization of FTZ 22 under the alternative site framework (ASF) 
(Board Order 1738, 1/12/2011, 76 FR 4285, 1/25/2011), FTZ 22 
subsequently requested to designate the Baxter facility as a usage-
driven site (Site 21, A27f-2-2011, 1/14/2011), and requested T/IM 
authority for Baxter's manufacturing of I.V. products. The foreign-
origin component approved for this activity is laminated film (HTSUS 
3920.10). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and 
determined that it meets the criteria for approval under T/IM 
procedures. As noted above, public comment had been sought on the 
specific proposed activity through the Federal Register notice 
published regarding the proposed subzone authority (FTZ Doc. 60-2010).
    Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive 
Secretary in the above-referenced Board Orders, the application for T/
IM authority is approved, effective this date, until February 11, 2013, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.28.

    Dated: February 11, 2011.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3890 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P