alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 513.3 What happens to delinquent debts owed to the Commission? ( a ) The Commission will collect debts in accordance with these regulations in this part.
( b ) The Commission will transfer to the Department of the Treasury any past due, legally enforceable nontax debt that has been delinquent for 180 days or more so that Treasury may take appropriate action to collect the debt or terminate collection action in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5514, 26 U.S.C. 6402, 31 U.S.C. 3711 and 3716, the FCCS, 5 CFR 550.1108, and 31 CFR part 285.
( c ) The Commission may transfer any past due, legally enforceable nontax debt that has been delinquent for fewer than 180 days to the Department of Treasury for collection in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5514, 26 U.S.C. 6402, 31 U.S.C. 3711 and 3716, the FFCS, 5 CFR 550.1108, and 31 CFR part 285.
#### Central States Gas Company *v.*Parker Russell Mining and Manufacturing Company et al.

[No. 12,304.

Filed July 1, 1925.]

From Gibson Circuit Court; *Robert C. Baltzell,*Judge.

Action between the Central States Gas Company and the Parker Russell Mining and Manufacturing Company and others. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*Marshall & Fraser, P. R. Taylor, Baltzell & Baltzell*and *William A. Alsop,*for appellant.

*Douglas W. Robert, William F. Calverly, Luoius C. Embree, Morton C. Embree*and *Emison & Hoover,*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.
H. Res. 604

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 3, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 110)

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—RAILROAD REORGANIZATION
Exhibit 35.5



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-2 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-2
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|              
|--------------
|March 1, 2016 
|              
|LOGO          
|              
|Kristen Cronin
|Vice President



|                       |  |  |  |     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |  |  | LOGO
### §9317. Thirty years or more: regular enlisted members

A regular enlisted member of the Air Force or the Space Force who has at least 30 years of service computed under section 9325 of this title shall be retired upon his request.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 550, §8917; renumbered §9317 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§806(b)(13), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, 1840; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(15), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3811.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8917 | 10:947 (less proviso).10:947a (less last 11 words). | Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2515, §1 (1st 35 words), 34 Stat. 1217. |
| | | Feb. 14, 1885, ch. 67 (less 43d through 53d words); restated Sept. 30, 1890, ch. 1125 (less 43d through 53d words), 26 Stat. 504. |

10:947a (less last 11 words).

The word "regular" is inserted to conform to an opinion of the Judge Advocate General of the Army (JAGA 1953/2301, 23 Mar. 1953). The words "upon his request" are substituted for the words "upon making application to the President", in 10:947, and "by application to the President", in 10:947a. The words "either as a private or non-commissioned officer, or both", in 10:947a, are omitted as surplusage. The words "shall be retired" are substituted for the words "be placed upon the retired list", in 10:947, and "be placed on the retired list heretofore created", in 10:947a. The words "computed under section 8925 of this title" are inserted for clarity. The 21 words before the proviso and the proviso of the Act of February 14, 1885, as restated, are not contained in 10:947a. They are also omitted from the revised section, since the proviso is executed and the 21 words before the proviso are omitted as covered by formula E of section 8991 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9317 was renumbered section 9417 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted "or the Space Force" after "Air Force".

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8917 of this title as this section and substituted "section 9325" for "section 8925".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §649k. Regulations

The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations regarding the administration of this subchapter. The elements of such regulations shall include mechanisms to clarify the manner in which provisions of other subchapters of this chapter shall be used in the administration of this subchapter in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title V, §507(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1748.)
#### Graves *v.*Graves.

[No. 11,899.

Filed October 9, 1924.

Rehearing denied January 30, 1925.]

From Marion Superior Court (A 17,672); *Clinton H¡ Givan,*Judge.

Action between Lydia Graves and Frank Graves. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*Robert L. Bailey,*for appellant.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 10.4 to 2008 10-Q**

**AMENDMENT AGREEMENT**

August 11, 2008 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is made to our Five-YearCompetitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated as of October 20, 2006 (the “Credit Agreement”), among Convergys Corporation (the “Company”), the several lenders party thereto (the“Lenders”), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Citicorp USA, Inc., as Syndication Agent; and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch and PNC Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents, as amended and ineffect on the date hereof. Each capitalized term used and not otherwise defined herein has the meaning assigned to such term in the Credit Agreement. 

An ambiguity exists in the Credit Agreement creating potentially conflicting interpretations of Section 5.08 of the Credit Agreement and Section 3.12 of the Credit Agreement. To resolve this ambiguity, wehereby request your consent as a Lender under the Credit Agreement to an amendment and restatement of Section 3.12 of the Credit Agreement to read as follows: 

SECTION 3.12. Use of Proceeds. Neither the Borrower nor any Subsidiary is engaged principally, or as one of its importantactivities, in the business of extending credit for the purpose, whether immediate, incidental or ultimate, of buying or carrying margin stock (within the meaning of Regulation T, U or X of the Board). No part of the proceeds of any Loan will beused, whether directly or indirectly, for any purpose that entails a violation of any of the Regulations of the Board, including Regulations T, U, and X. 

Please confirm your consent to the above amendment by countersigning and returning the attached signature page. 

This Amendment Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of New York. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment Agreement to be duly executed by theirrespective authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. 

 
CONVERGYS CORPORATION,By: /s/ Timothy M. Wesolowski Senior Vice President, Controller & Treasurer
[Document signed by: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A; CitiBank, N.A.; The Bank of Nova Scotia; PNC Bank, N.A.;Wachovia Bank, NA; Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch; Fifth Third Bank; U.S. Bank NA; Wells Fargo Bank NA; UBS Loan Finance LLC; and National City Bank] 

 
 Lender Signature Page to the Amendment Agreement dated as of August 11, 2008, to the Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated as ofOctober 20, 2006, among Convergys Corporation, the several lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent.
Name of Lender:
   by    Name:  Title: [If a second signature is required by the Lender:] by    Name:  Title:
### SUBCHAPTER II—THE PLAN
#### George E. King v. The State.

No. 22780.

Delivered March 1, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Grover C. Morris*and *Edward Dwyer,*both of San Antonio, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is robbery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

*58Appellant brings forward two complaints. The first relates to the reproduction of the testimony given by Joe L. Desarro, the injured party, at the examining trial of appellant for the offense charged. He contends that a proper predicate for its introduction was not laid. We are not in accord with this contention. The bill shows that Joe L. Desarro was a native of the State of Illinois but at the time of the alleged offense, he was a soldier in the United States Army, and a member of the 95th Division stationed at San Antonio, Texas; that at the time of the trial the 95th Division had been moved out of the state and beyond the jurisdiction of the court; that the whereabouts of the Division was a military secret and could not be disclosed. If the injured party was absent without leave or did not go with the Division, a record thereof would have been made and placed in charge of the Military Police, but that organization had no record that he was absent without leave or that he was not moved with the division. We think that the showing made by the State was sufficient as a predicate upon which to permit the introduction of the reproduced testimony. The injured party was not a native of Texas, nor did he come to Texas to make it his permanent home. He was only temporarily residing in this state and the length of his sojourn here was within the exclusive control of the Commander-in-Chief and the generals of the military force working under his direction.

With reference to appellant’s second contention, the State’s evidence, briefly stated, shows that on the night of June 14, 1943, while the injured party was walking along Houston Street in the City of San Antonio, some one struck him, knocked him down, which rendered him unconscious for a second, and robbed him of his billfold containing $30.00 in money. When he recovered consciousness he saw a party running down the street; that he went in pursuit and soon some boys joined him in the chase; that after they had chased the fleeing man a few blocks they overtook him, and Desarro asked him to return the money to him but appellant denied that he had it, whereupon Desarro struck him, and appellant then led his pursuers back a few blocks to a patch of weeds where he picked up the billfold and returned it to the owner, Joe L. Desarro, but $10.00 were missing therefrom. Appellant did not testify or ofier any affirmative defense. We deem the evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s conclusion of his guilt.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

*59The» foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
155 So.2d 602

#### Clyde CARTER v. STATE.

3 Div. 42.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 25, 1963.

Fred Gray and Solomon S. Seay, Jr., Montgomery, Jack Greenberg and Leroy D. ■Clark, New York City, and Louis H. Poliak, New Haven, Conn., for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and 'Leslie Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Petition of Clyde Carter for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise ■the judgment and decision of that Court in Carter v. State, 155 So.2d 602.

Writ denied.

■ LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON .•and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.
### §9023. Chief of Legislative Liaison

(a) There is a Chief of Legislative Liaison in the Department of the Air Force.

(b) The Chief of Legislative Liaison shall perform legislative affairs functions as specified for the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force by section 9014(c)(1)(F) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title V, §504(e)(1)(A), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2532, §8023; amended Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(jj), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2106; renumbered §9023 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§806(c), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, 1840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9023, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 558, related to employment of civilians in service club and library services, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 87–651, title I, §128(1), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 514.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §806(c), renumbered section 8023 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 9014(c)(1)(F)" for "section 8014(c)(1)(F)".

2016—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–328 struck out second sentence which read as follows: "An officer assigned to that position shall be an officer in the grade of major general."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Report Documentation Page Form Approved

OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and

maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,

including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington

VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it

does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

1. REPORT DATE

1997 2. REPORT TYPE

3. DATES COVERED

 00-00-1997 to 00-00-1997 

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

Winged Shield, Winged Sword

5a. CONTRACT NUMBER

5b. GRANT NUMBER

5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER

6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER

5e. TASK NUMBER

5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

Air Force History and Musem Program,United States Air 

Force,Washington,DC

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION

REPORT NUMBER

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)

11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT 

NUMBER(S)

12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

14. ABSTRACT

15. SUBJECT TERMS

16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 

ABSTRACT

Same as

Report (SAR)

18. NUMBER

OF PAGES

524

19a. NAME OF

RESPONSIBLE PERSON

a. REPORT

unclassified

b. ABSTRACT

unclassified

c. THIS PAGE

unclassified

Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98)

Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
Exhibit 34.2




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors


U.S. Bank National Association






We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Report on Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), as defined in management’s assertion, as of March 31, 2012, and for the period fromApril 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012, except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)–(iv), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)–(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)–(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing Platform covered by this report.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of March 31, 2012, and for the periodfrom April 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012, for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.






/s/ Ernst & Young LLP






Minneapolis, Minnesota


May 31, 2012
### [§9748. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–651, title I, §129(1), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 514]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 588, related to transportation of motor vehicles for members on permanent change of station.
#### § 43.9 Procedures for granting access.

Each educational institution shall establish appropriate procedures for granting a request by parents for access to the records of their children, or by eligible students for access to their own records within a reasonable period of time. In no case shall access be withheld more than forty-five (45) days after the request has been made.
#### Portland Company, Appellant, v. Hall & Grant Construction Company and Charles Ward Hall, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on memorandum handed down on motion for reargumeut. (See 123 App. Div. 495.)
### §9498. Regulations

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this chapter.

(b) Required Regulations.—The regulations shall include the following:

(1) Regulations governing the conduct of the activities of the Civil Air Patrol when it is performing its duties as a volunteer civilian auxiliary of the Air Force under section 9492 of this title.

(2) Regulations for providing support by the Air Force and for arranging assistance by other agencies under section 9494 of this title.

(3) Regulations governing the qualifications of retired Air Force personnel to serve as an administrator or liaison officer for the Civil Air Patrol under a personal services contract entered into under section 9496(a) of this title.

(c) Approval by Secretary of Defense.—The regulations required by subsection (b)(2) shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1090(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–299, §9448; renumbered §9498 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§806(a)(1), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832, 1840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §806(a)(1), renumbered section 9448 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 9492" for "section 9442".

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 9494" for "section 9444".

Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 9496(a)" for "section 9446(a)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Oct. 30, 2000, see section 1 [[div. A], title X, §1090(c)] of Pub. L. 106–398, set out as a note under section 9491 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1:  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
               Officer under Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant Section 906 of
               the Sarbanes-Oxley Act


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Signal Advance, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as well as Amendments # 1 and
#2 (the "Report") fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



     /s/Chris M. Hymel

     Chris M. Hymel
     President/Treasurer


November XX, 2015