alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward L. Pierce, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of  BindView  Development  Corporation  (the  "Company"),  certify
that (i) the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained in the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.

By       /s/ EDWARD L. PIERCE
         -----------------------------
         Edward L. Pierce
         Director, Executive Vice President and
         Chief Financial Officer
         May 14, 2004


     A signed original of the foregoing  certification  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SkyLynx Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the year ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), we, Gary L. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Daniel J. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary L. Brown                               Gary L. Brown, President and Chief
Executive Officer
November 23, 2004

/s/ Daniel J. Sullivan                           Daniel J. Sullivan, Chief Financial 
Officer
November 23, 2004
### §8607. Administration of liberated and occupied areas

(a) The Secretary of the Navy may, out of any appropriation made for the purpose, provide for the administration of liberated and occupied areas by the Department of the Navy.

(b) The Secretary, to the extent he considers proper, may delegate the authority conferred by this section to any person in the Department of the Navy, with or without the authority to make successive redelegations.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 443, §7207; renumbered §8607, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7207 | 5 U.S.C. 421f (as applicable to administration of liberated and occupied areas). | Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 756, §38 (as applicable to administration of liberated and occupied areas), 60 Stat. 858. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 412a. | Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 756, §39, 60 Stat. 858. |

In subsection (b) the words "except the authority to prescribe regulations" are omitted, since 5 U.S.C. 421f contains no authority for the Secretary of the Navy to prescribe regulations for the administration of that section.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7207 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### CITY FINANCE CO. v. MASSEY MOTOR CO.

No. 461P89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 623

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 January 1990.
### §9801. Definition

In this chapter, the term "settle" means consider, ascertain, adjust, determine, and dispose of a claim, whether by full or partial allowance or by disallowance.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 591; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XII, §1231(19)(B), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1161.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9801 | [No source]. | [No source]. |

The revised section is inserted for clarity, and is based on usage in the source laws for this revised chapter.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1987—Pub. L. 100–180 inserted "the term" after "In this chapter,".
#### Board of Commissioners of Sullivan County *v.*Town of Carlisle.

[No. 11,864.

Filed November 18, 1924.]

From Sullivan Circuit Court; *Walter F. Wood,*Judge.

Action between the board of commissioners of Sullivan county against the town of Carlisle. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals.

*Reversed.*

*Lindley & Bedwell,*for appellant.

*Kessinger & Hill*and *A. G. McNabb,*for appellee.

Remy, J.

Reversed on authority of *Board, etc.,*v. *Town of Carlisle*(1924), *ante*63, 144 N. E. 859.
H. Res. 489

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 4, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 434) to authorize a new trade and investment

policy for sub-Sahara Africa. All points of order against the

conference report and against its consideration are waived.

The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
### [§2437. Renumbered §4321]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2437, added Pub. L. 99–500, §101(c) [title X, §906(a)(1)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–82, 1783–135, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(c) [title X, §906(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–82, 3341–135; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title IX, formerly title IV, §906(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3915; renumbered title IX, Pub. L. 100–26, §3(5), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 273; amended Pub. L. 100–26, §7(b)(8), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 280; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VIII, §803(b), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1125; Pub. L. 100–224, §5(a)(3), Dec. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 1538, related to designation of defense enterprise programs for milestone authorization, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §821(a)(5), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1704.
### [§9835. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title X, §1006(c)(1), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2633]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 593, related to action upon reports of surveys and vouchers pertaining to the loss, spoilage, unserviceability, unsuitability, or destruction of or damage to property of the United States under the control of the Department of the Air Force.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to loss, spoilage, unserviceability, unsuitability, or destruction of, or damage to, property of United States under control of Department of Defense occurring on or after effective date of regulations prescribed pursuant to section 2787 of this title, see section 1006(d) of Pub. L. 107–314, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2787 of this title.
# C_2014017EN.01000801.xml

| 21.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/8

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 17/05

| Date of adoption of the decision | 14.11.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.36650 (13/N) |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Ayudas compensatorias por costes de emisiones indirectas de CO2 |
| Legal basis | Proyecto de Real Decreto por el que se aprueba la creación de un mecanismo de compensación de costes indirectos de CO2 para empresas de determinados sectores y subsectores industriales a los que se considera expuestos a un riesgo significativo de «fuga de carbono» |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 5 000 000 |
| Intensity | 85 % |
| Duration (period) | 1.1.2013-31.12.2015 |
| Economic sectors | Mining and quarrying, manufacturing |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministerio de Industria, Energia y Turismo |
| Paseo de la Castellana, 160 |
| 28071 Madrid |
| ESPAÑA |

Date of adoption of the decision

14.11.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.36650 (13/N)

Member State

Spain

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Ayudas compensatorias por costes de emisiones indirectas de CO2

2

Legal basis

Proyecto de Real Decreto por el que se aprueba la creación de un mecanismo de compensación de costes indirectos de CO2 para empresas de determinados sectores y subsectores industriales a los que se considera expuestos a un riesgo significativo de «fuga de carbono»

2

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 5 000 000

Intensity

85 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2013-31.12.2015

Economic sectors

Mining and quarrying, manufacturing

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministerio de Industria, Energia y Turismo

Paseo de la Castellana, 160

28071 Madrid

ESPAÑA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### OWENS v. PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CO.

No. 440PA89

Case below: 95 N.C.App. 47

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 18 January 1990.
#### § 20.324 When can the Bureau provide Burial Assistance?

In the absence of other resources, the Bureau can provide Burial Assistance for eligible indigent Indians meeting the requirements prescribed in § 20.300.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David Liu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|

| | /s/ David Liu                       
| | ------------------------------------
| | David Liu                           
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 9, 2007

---
155 So.2d 348

#### Ex parte Jessie D. GLISSON.

2 Div. 445.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 3, 1963.

Jessie D. Glisson, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., for the State.

MERRILL, Justice.

Petitioner, a convict in the State penitentiary, filed an original petition for habeas corpus in this court. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss, which must be granted.

The petition shows on its face that a petition for writ of habeas corpus was heard and denied by the Circuit Court of Montgomery County on May 7, 1963. An appeal lies from such an order. Tit. 15, § 369, Code 1940.

The petition also seeks to raise questions not subject to be raised in a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this state. Griffin v. State, 258 Ala. 557, 63 So.2d 682.

Motion to dismiss petition granted.

Petition dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Stay Informed 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Stay Informed

**Sign up to receive emails about the latest news from PBGC. Choose from as many of the following topics as you wish:**

##                   Press Releases              

Sign up to receive news releases from PBGC.

PRESS RELEASES

##                   What's New for Practitioners              

Find out the latest news for pension plan practitioners including Premium Filings, Reportable Events, Funding Relief Notifications, and more.

WHAT'S NEW FOR PRACTITIONERS

##                   Monthly Interest Rates              

Receive notifications each month of interest rate updates that are accessible from the Interest Rates & Factors webpage.

MONTHLY INTEREST RATES

September 3, 2021
### [§2335. Renumbered §4660]
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Premium Filings 
-  Online Premium Filing With My PAA 
-  My PAA Online Demonstrations 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# My PAA Online Demonstrations

Review the demo links below to get familiar with how to use My PAA to perform premium-related tasks.
                          - Also available is the  My PAA Demo End to End  video that includes items from all four categories in the existing chart.

April 24, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLSCRIPTS, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          83,243
<SECURITIES>                                    30,917
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,735
<INVENTORY>                                      4,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,651
<PP&E>                                          15,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,833
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           294
<OTHER-SE>                                     320,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,642
<SALES>                                         21,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,763
<CGS>                                           17,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,439
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,455)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,310)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,310)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   4,436
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,874)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.32 Purpose of off-reservation grants. The Secretary or his/her designee is authorized to make grants to off-reservation Indian organizations to establish and operate off-reservation Indian child and family service programs for the purpose of stabilizing Indian families and tribes, preventing the breakup of Indian families and, in particular, to ensure that the permanent removal of an Indian child from the custody of his/her Indian parent or Indian custodian shall be a last resort. Child and family service programs may include, but are not limited to: ( a ) A system for regulating, maintaining, and supporting Indian foster and adoptive homes, including a subsidy program under which Indian adoptive children may be provided support comparable to that for which they would be eligible as Indian foster children, taking into account the appropriate state standards of support for maintenance and medical needs;
( b ) The operation and maintenance of facilities and services for counseling and treatment of Indian families and Indian foster and adoptive children with the goal of strengthening and stabilizing Indian families;
( c ) Family assistance (including homemaker and home counselors), protective day care and afterschool care, employment support services, recreational activities, and respite care with the goal of strengthening Indian families and contributing toward family stability; and
( d ) Guidance, legal representation and advice to Indian families involved in state child custody proceedings.
#### McCABE v. DAWKINS

No. 127P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 447

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# The 4th U.S.-Japan Bilateral Cyber Dialogue

By Office of the SpokespersonWashington, DC

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DEFINITIONS

Sec.
467.
Definitions.
§ 293.4 Are compacts and amendments subject to review and approval? ( a ) Yes. All compacts and amendments, regardless of whether they are substantive or technical, must be submitted for review and approval by the Secretary.
( b ) If an ancillary agreement or document: ( 1 ) Modifies a term in a compact or an amendment, then it must be submitted for review and approval by the Secretary.
( 2 ) Implements or clarifies a provision within a compact or an amendment and is not inconsistent with an approved compact or amendment, it does not constitute a compact or an amendment and need not be submitted for review and approval by the Secretary.
( 3 ) Is expressly contemplated within an approved compact or amendment, such as internal controls or a memorandum of agreement between the Tribal and State regulators, then such agreement or document is not subject to review and approval so long as it is not inconsistent with the approved compact or amendment.
( 4 ) Interprets language in a compact or an amendment concerning a Tribe's revenue sharing to the State, its agencies, or political subdivisions under § 293.27 or includes any of the topics identified in § 293.23, then it may constitute an amendment subject to review and approval by the Secretary.
( c ) If a Tribe or a State (including its political subdivisions) is concerned that its agreement or other document may be considered a “compact” or “amendment,” either party may request in writing a determination from the Department if their agreement or other document is a compact or amendment and therefore must be approved and a notice published in the Federal Register prior to the agreement or other document becoming effective. The Department will issue a letter within 30 days of receipt of the written request, providing notice of the Secretary's determination. If the agreement or other document is determined to be a compact or amendment, it must be resubmitted for Secretarial review and approval consistent with the requirements of subpart B of this part.