alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 1 0 9 2 7 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. H E C T O R L I M A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 3 : 0 8

- C R

- 2 3 1

- 2

B e f o r e H I G G I N B O T H A M , G A R Z A , a n d E L R O D , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t H e c t o r L i m a h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o

w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f

i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. L i m a h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d

a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y ,
c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 15 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-10927 Document: 00511382044 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 18

- 356

_____________________________

R ICKY S WEET

,

Appellant,

v.

A LICIA M ONIQUE T UCKER

,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Francis Allman , Judge

.

January 7, 2019

B.L. T HOMAS

, C.J.

On December 20, 2017, the trial court issued an order of recusal in Appellant’s case, and subsequent ly issued an order denying Appellant’s motion to dissolve injunction, without prejudice to refile.

I n t h e order of recusal , the judge indicated that he was aware of the grounds for recusal at the hearing on Appellant’s motion

, but still issued the order denying Appellant’s motion after the hearing

. We therefore vacate the order denying Appellant’s motion to dissolve injunction and remand to the trial court for a new hearing on the motion. See Lance Block, P.A. v. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart and S hipley, P.A. , 85 So. 3d 1122, 1124 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (vacating order and remanding where trial judge “may well have known of the grounds for the recusal order when he entered the order” at issue) (footnote removed)

.2 W ETHERELL and W INSOR

, JJ., concur

.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

_____________________________

Ricky Sweet, pro se

, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.
### §940. Art. 140. Delegation by the President

The President may delegate any authority vested in him under this chapter, and provide for the subdelegation of any such authority.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 78.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 940 | 50:736. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 140), 64 Stat. 145. |

The word "may" is substituted for the words "is authorized to * * * to".
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  KeySpan  Corporation  (the
"Corporation")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Robert B. Catell,  Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Corporation.








                                      By:    /s/Robert B. Catell
                                      --------------------------
                                      Name:  Robert B. Catell
                                      Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors
                                             and Chief Executive Officer
                                      Date:  November 7, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.2 – 906 Certification





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Genmed Holding Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





Date: August 15, 2011
/s/ Randy HibmaRandy Hibma

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Genmed Holding Corp., and will be retained by Genmed Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6526

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GERALD DAVID DAVAGE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-41-PJM, CA-00-750-JFM) Submitted: June 20, 2000 Decided: July 10, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald David Davage, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan Edwin Foreman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gerald D. Davage appeals the district court’s order dismissing his independent action to set aside the judgement in Davage’s previous 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion to vacate. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Davage , Nos. CR-94-41- PJM; CA-00-750-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2014215EN.01000701.xml

| 9.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/7

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 172 of 6 June 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 172 of 6 June 2014

2014/C 215/08

On page 11, Aid number SA.37634 (2014/NN), field ‘Date of adoption of the decision’:

for:

for:

‘15.04.2014’,

read:

read:

‘12.5.2014’.

---
#### § 137.1 Water supply.

The engineering report dealt with in section 1 of the act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 475) and other available records show that the storage capacity of the San Carlos reservoir created by the Coolidge Dam and the water supply therefor over a period of years will provide for the irrigation of only 80,000 acres of lands in Indian and public or private ownership within the San Carlos irrigation project, the balance of the water supply needed for the additional 20,000 acres of the project to be provided for by recaptured and return flow water and by means of pumping the underground supply. The cost of providing the proposed supply and of operating the works for this latter acreage to be equally distributed over the entire 100,000 acres of the project regardless of where the works are placed and operated.
----

Action brought on 4 September 2006 — Blank and Others v Commission

(Case F-103/06)

(2006/C 261/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Klaus Blank (St. Stevens-Woluwe, Belgium) and Others (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers )

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants rely on pleas in law very similar to those pleaded in Case F-45/06. (1)

----

(1)  OJEU C 143, 17.06.2006, p. 39.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, April 21, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, April 21, 2011, at 2 p.m., Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: February 18, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-4322 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### [§2326. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1881(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4293]

Section, added Pub. L. 99–500, §101(c) [title X, §908(d)(1)(A)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–82, 1783–140, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(c) [title X, §908(d)(1)(A)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–82, 3341–140; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title IX, formerly title IV, §908(d)(1)(A), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3920, renumbered title IX, Pub. L. 100–26, §3(5), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 273; amended Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XVI, §1622(c)(6), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1604; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §701(d)(5), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 114; Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1505, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3298; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VIII, §803(a), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1831; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, §811, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2268; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII, §815(a), (b), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1462; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, §902(50), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1548; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1819(b), (c)(1), (d), (e)(1), (f), (g), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4189–4191, related to restrictions for undefinitized contractual actions. See, generally, chapter 244 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2326 was renumbered section 2346 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0099

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RUSTY DEWAYNE WAGONER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 18, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

James Jeremiah Shea

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 12 2020

11/12/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0099
### [§2010. Renumbered §321]
H. Res. 470

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 12, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3039) to amend the Federal Water Pollution

Control Act to assist in the restoration of the Chesapeake

Bay, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to

the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After

general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment

under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as

read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in
2

•HRES 470 EH

clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 00030001
- 00040002
- 00050003
- 00060004
- 00070000
- 00080000
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110005
- 00120006
- 00130000
- 00140000
- 00150007
- 00160008
- 00170009
- 00180010
- 00190000
- 00200000
- 00210000
- 00220000
- 00230000
- 00240000
- 00250000
- 00260000
- 00270011
- 00280012
- 00290000
- 00300000
- 00310000
- 00320000
- 00330000
- 00340000
- 00350000
- 00360000
- 00370000
- 00380000
- 00390000
- 00400000
- 00410013
- 00420014
- 00430000
- 00440000
- 00450015
- 00460016
- 00470000
- 00480000
- 00490000
- 00500000
- 00510000
- 00520000
- 00530000
- 00540000
- 00550017
- 00560018
- 00570000
- 00580000
- 00590019
- 00600020
- 00610021
- 00620022
- 00630023
- 00640024
- 00650025
- 00660026
- 006700bi
- 006800bc
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00094-CV

Juan Torres, Appellant

v.

American Mortgage Investment Partners Fund I Trust, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-15-008259, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was due on May 19, 2016. On June 6, 2016, this Court notified

appellant that his brief was overdue and that a failure to respond by June 16, 2016 would result in

the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a

motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismissthis appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.

R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 6, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 454 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         April 4, 2000.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2418) to amend the Public Health Service Act to revise and extend 
programs relating to organ procurement and transplantation. The first reading of 
the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill 
and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Commerce. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be 
in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Commerce now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. No amendment to the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 
Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be 
offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, 
shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, 
and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House 
or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against the amendments 
printed in the report are waived. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 
may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of 
the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five 
minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that 
follows another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the 
minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall 
be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any 
amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### [§16137. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, §1061(29)(A), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1584]

Section, added Pub. L. 98–525, title VII, §705(a)(1), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2567, §2137; renumbered §16137, Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1663(b)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3006; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1077, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 451; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §548(a), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 609, required biennial report on the operation of the educational assistance program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RAILWORKS CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,849,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              120,605,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   592,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,096,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           199,052,000
<PP&E>                                      66,680,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,431,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             442,618,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       96,956,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,000
<COMMON>                                       139,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 117,710,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               442,618,000
<SALES>                                    188,483,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           188,483,000
<CGS>                                     (152,072,000)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (152,072,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (21,777,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (6,458,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,237,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                (3,466,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,771,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38


</TABLE>