alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 515.13 Specific exemptions. ( a ) The following systems of records are exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1) and (f): ( 1 ) Indian Gaming Individuals Records System.
( 2 ) Management Contract Individuals Record System.
( b ) The exemptions under paragraph (a) of this section apply only to the extent that information in these systems is subject to exemption under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). When compliance would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the overall responsibilities of the Commission, with respect to licensing of key employees and primary management officials for employment in an Indian gaming operation or verifying the suitability of an individual who has a financial interest in, or management responsibility for a management contract, the applicable exemption may be waived by the Commission.
( c ) Exemptions from the particular sections are justified for the following reasons: ( 1 ) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), because making available the accounting of disclosures to an individual who is the subject of a record could reveal investigative interest. This would permit the individual to take measures to destroy evidence, intimidate potential witnesses, or flee the area to avoid the investigation.
( 2 ) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(d), (e)(1), and (f) concerning individual access to records, when such access could compromise classified information related to national security, interfere with a pending investigation or internal inquiry, constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy, reveal a sensitive investigative technique, or pose a potential threat to the Commission or its employees or to law enforcement personnel. Additionally, access could reveal the identity of a source who provided information under an express promise of confidentiality.
( 3 ) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(2), because to require the Commission to amend information thought to be incorrect, irrelevant, or untimely, because of the nature of the information collected and the length of time it is maintained, would create an impossible administrative and investigative burden by continually forcing the Commission to resolve questions of accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness.
( 4 ) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) because: ( i ) It is not always possible to determine relevance or necessity of specific information in the early stages of an investigation.
( ii ) Relevance and necessity are matters of judgment and timing in that what appears relevant and necessary when collected may be deemed unnecessary later. Only after information is assessed can its relevance and necessity be established.
( iii ) In any investigation the Commission may receive information concerning violations of law under the jurisdiction of another agency. In the interest of effective law enforcement and under 25 U.S.C. 2716(b), the information could be relevant to an investigation by the Commission.
( iv ) In the interviewing of individuals or obtaining evidence in other ways during an investigation, the Commission could obtain information that may or may not appear relevant at any given time; however, the information could be relevant to another investigation by the Commission.
ex_307231.htm


 


Exhibit 10.2


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated February 4, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between SilverSun Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Mark Meller (the “Executive”), is hereby entered into this 11th day of November 2021.


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive previously entered into the Employment Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to provide for the continued employment of the Executive on the terms and conditions contained in the Employment Agreement, as modified by this Amendment;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:


 


1. Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is replaced in its entirety by the following:


 


“2. Term. The term of the Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue through September 14, 2028.”


 


2. All remaining terms of the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, as amended hereby.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer pursuant to the authority of its Board, and the Executive has executed this Amendment, as of the date set forth above.


 


	 	 	 
	
			SILVERSUN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

			
	 
	
			By: /s/ Joseph Macaliso

			
	
			Name: Joseph P. Macaluso

			
	
			            Principal Financial Officer

			



 


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
			EXECUTIVE

				 
	 	 	 
	
			By: /s/ Mark Meller

				 
	
			Name: Mark Meller

				 
	
			Dated: November 11, 2021
#### STATE v. TESSENAIR

No. 51P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 334

Petition by defendant for writ of supersedeas and temporary stay denied 6 February 1990.
### §9804. Salvage claims by United States

(a) The Secretary of the Air Force may settle, or compromise, and receive payment of a claim by the United States for salvage services performed by the Department of the Air Force. Amounts received under this section shall be covered into the Treasury.

(b) In any case where the amount to be received by the United States is not more than $10,000, the Secretary of the Air Force may delegate his authority under subsection (a) to any person designated by him.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 592; Pub. L. 92–417, §1(8), Aug. 29, 1972, 86 Stat. 655.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9804 | 10:1863. | Oct. 20, 1951, ch. 524, §3, 65 Stat. 573. |

The words "under this section" are substituted for the words "for salvage services rendered". The words "consider, ascertain, adjust, determine" are omitted as covered by the word "settle", as defined in section 9801 of this title. The words "and receive payment of" are inserted for clarity and to conform to section 9803 of this title. The words "as miscellaneous receipts" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–417 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), and in subsec. (a) as so designated, eliminated the requirement that the Secretary of the Air Force discharge his functions under the direction of the Secretary of Defense, and added subsec. (b).
### §2017. Limitation on establishment of postsecondary educational institutions pending notice to Congress

(a) Limitation.—The Secretary of Defense may not establish a postsecondary educational institution within the Department of Defense until a period of one year has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees of the intent of the Secretary to establish the institution.

(b) Postsecondary Educational Institution Defined.—In this section, the term "postsecondary educational institution" means a school or other educational institution that is intended to provide students with a course of instruction that is comparable, in length and academic rigor, to a course of instruction for which an associate's, bachelor's, or graduate degree may be awarded.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §553(b)(1), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1387.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Applicability

Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §553(b)(3), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1387, provided that: "Section 2017 of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall apply with respect to postsecondary educational institutions intended to be established by the Secretary of Defense on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 20, 2019]."
EXHIBIT 34.1





LOGO

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of

Worlds Foremost Bank

Lincoln, Nebraska

We have examined managements assertion,
included in the accompanying Report on Compliance with Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Managements Report), that Worlds Foremost Bank (WFB)
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the Cabelas Master Credit Card Trust and Cabelas Credit Card Master Note Trust (the
Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by WFB with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for WFBs compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about WFBs compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about WFBs compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether WFB performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by WFB
during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance
arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by WFB during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on WFBs compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our
opinion, managements assertion that WFB complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





LOGO

March 27, 2015





LOGO
### **CHAPTER 15—ANCILLARY AND OTHER CROSS-BORDER CASES**

Sec.
1501.
Purpose and scope of application.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

1502.
Definitions.
1503.
International obligations of the United States.
1504.
Commencement of ancillary case.
1505.
Authorization to act in a foreign country.
1506.
Public policy exception.
1507.
Additional assistance.
1508.
Interpretation.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—ACCESS OF FOREIGN REPRESENTATIVES AND CREDITORS TO THE COURT

1509.
Right of direct access.
1510.
Limited jurisdiction.
1511.
Commencement of case under section 301 or 303. 1

1512.
Participation of a foreign representative in a case under this title.
1513.
Access of foreign creditors to a case under this title.
1514.
Notification to foreign creditors concerning a case under this title.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—RECOGNITION OF A FOREIGN PROCEEDING AND RELIEF

1515.
Application for recognition.
1516.
Presumptions concerning recognition.
1517.
Order granting recognition.
1518.
Subsequent information.
1519.
Relief that may be granted upon filing petition for recognition.
1520.
Effects of recognition of a foreign main proceeding.
1521.
Relief that may be granted upon recognition.
1522.
Protection of creditors and other interested persons.
1523.
Actions to avoid acts detrimental to creditors.
1524.
Intervention by a foreign representative.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—COOPERATION WITH FOREIGN COURTS AND FOREIGN REPRESENTATIVES

1525.
Cooperation and direct communication between the court and foreign courts or foreign representatives.
1526.
Cooperation and direct communication between the trustee and foreign courts or foreign representatives.
1527.
Forms of cooperation.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—CONCURRENT PROCEEDINGS

1528.
Commencement of a case under this title after recognition of a foreign main proceeding.
1529.
Coordination of a case under this title and a foreign proceeding.
1530.
Coordination of more than 1 foreign proceeding.
1531.
Presumption of insolvency based on recognition of a foreign main proceeding.
1532.
Rule of payment in concurrent proceedings.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 15, consisting of sections 1501 to 151326, related to a pilot program for a United States trustee system, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–554, title II, §231, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3103.

1  So in original. Section catchline amended by Pub. L. 111–327 without corresponding amendment of chapter analysis.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Patrick G. Yount, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, that:

|  | 1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   |   |   |                                                                            |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ PATRICK G. YOUNT                                                            |
|   |   |   |                                                                                 |
|   |   |   | **Patrick G. Yount****Chief Financial Officer and Secretary****August 8, 2003** |
### [§2794. Renumbered §453]
#### § 47.6 Who has access to local education financial records?

The Comptroller General, the Assistant Secretary, the Director, or any of their duly authorized representatives have access for audit and explanation purposes to any of the local school's accounts, documents, papers, and records which are related to the Bureau-operated schools' operation.
# C_2006178EN.01004003.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/40

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 1 June 2006 — Port Support Customs Rotterdam v Commission

(Case T -319/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 178/73)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form10-Q") of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 10, 2008                          By: /s/ Yaron Meerfeld
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Yaron Meerfeld
                                                  Acting Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### [§2533b. Renumbered §4863]
MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Three Months Ended
                                                                       September 30,
                                                                2002                   2001

<S>                                                           <C>                    <C>
Net Income                                                    $210,717               $164,219
                                                              ========               ========


Weighted average common shares outstanding
  for basic computation                                        363,975                363,975
                                                              ========               ========
Basic earnings per share                                      $   0.58               $   0.45


Weighted average common shares outstanding
  for basic computation                                        363,975                363,975

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effect
  of stock options                                               4,508                  4,744
                                                              --------               --------
Weighted average common shares and equivalents
  Outstanding for diluted computation                          368,483                368,719
                                                              ========               ========
Diluted earnings per share                                    $   0.57               $   0.45
                                                              ========               ========

</TABLE>
| (logo) plante             moran | **Plante & Moran, PLLC**10 South Riverside Plaza9th FloorChicago, IL 60606Tel: 312.207.1040Fax: 312.207.1066 plantemoran.com |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  To the Board of DirectorsNational Tax Search, LLC We have examined National Tax Search, LLC (the "Company") compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth-in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31 , 2015. The Company has determined that only certain servicing criteria, 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.  /s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC Chicago, ILJanuary 18, 2016 (logo) Praxity MEMBERGLOBAL ALLIANCE OFINDEPENDENT FIRMS
No. 89-6659.

#### Gavitt *v.*Michigan.

Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.