alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Eun Lee, Respondent, v Matthew D. Solimano, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 629]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered June 7, 2005, which, inter alia, dissolving the parties’ marriage, equitably distributing the marital property, and awarding plaintiff child support, plus maintenance of $1,000 per month until April 1, 2007, and bringing up for review the order, same court and Justice, entered on or about March 15, 2005, confirming the report of the Special Referee, unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Defendant, who asserted in the trial court that there was no need to submit to the court the transcript of the hearing conducted before the Special Referee, has waived the argument he would now make that the court should not have confirmed the Special Referee’s report without having before it a complete transcript of the underlying hearing. In any case, the record submitted to the court by plaintiff was sufficiently complete to permit meaningful review of the Special Referee’s findings and conclusions *(see Matter of Sledge v Sledge,*228 AD2d 310 [1996]).

The trial court appropriately decided those matters not addressed by the Special Referee pertaining to maintenance, child support and medical insurance *(see*CPLR 4403; *Salomon v Angsten,*19 AD3d 143, 144 [2005]). We decline to disturb the court’s determinations on these issues, which comport with the applicable statutory guidelines and are well supported by the record. The findings of the Special Referee are also supported by the record and, accordingly, were properly confirmed *(see Baker v Kohler,*28 AD3d 375, 375-376 [2006]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P, Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encompass Health Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J. Tarr, President and Chief Executive Officer of Encompass Health Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Encompass Health Corporation.




Date:August 2, 2018By:/s/ MARKJ. TARRMark J. TarrPresident and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Encompass Health Corporation and will be retained by Encompass Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This written statement shall not, except to the extent required by the 2002 Act, be deemed filed by Encompass Health Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Encompass Health Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Joel Hinderstein et al., Appellants, v Town of Babylon, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 910]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for inverse condemnation, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated June 2, 2005, which denied their motion for leave to amend their complaint and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the existence of a protect-able property interest *(see Cathedral of Incarnation in Diocese of Long Is. v Garden City Co.,*265 AD 2d 286, 290 [1999]). Consequently, the Due Process Clauses of the United States and New York State Constitutions are not implicated *(see Board of Regents of State Colleges v Roth,*408 US 564 [1972]; *Morillo v City of New York,*178 AD2d 7, 12 [1992]).

The Supreme Court correctly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint, as the proposed amendment was palpably insufficient as a matter of law and totally devoid of merit *(see*CPLR 3025 [b]; *Tarantini v Russo Realty Corp.,*259 AD2d 484 [1999]). Florio, J.P., Adams, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.
----

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 June 2006 — Showa Denko KK v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-289/04 P) (1)

(Appeals - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Graphite electrodes - Article 81(1) EC - Fines - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Leniency Notice - Principle of non bis in idem)

(2006/C 237/01)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Showa Denko KK (represented by: M. Dolmans and P. Werdmuller, advocaten, and J. Temple-Lang, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Hellström and H. Gading, Agents), Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd, established in Tokyo, SGL Carbon AG, established in Wiesbaden (Germany), Nippon Carbon Co. Ltd, established in Tokyo, GrafTech International Ltd, formerly UCAR International Inc., established in Wilmington (United States), SEC Corp., established in Amagasaki (Japan), The Carbide/Graphite Group Inc., established in Pittsburgh (United States)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2004 in Joined Cases T-236/01, T-239/01, T-244/01 to T-246/01, T-251/01 and T-252/01 Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd and Others v Commission annulling in part Commission Decision 2002/271/EC of 18 July 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (COMP/E-1/36.490 — Graphite electrodes) and reducing the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 239, 25.09.2004.

----
### [§2353. Renumbered §4174]
### §949t. Maximum limits

The punishment which a military commission under this chapter may direct for an offense may not exceed such limits as the President or Secretary of Defense may prescribe for that offense.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2598.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 949t, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2617, related to maximum limits of punishment, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
Order entered May 16, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00407

- CR

SHADRICK RAYSHARD WO ODS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203r d Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17

- 51720

- P



### O RDER

Before the Court is Official Court Reporter Lisabeth Kellett’s May 14, 2019 first request

for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the

reporter’s record filed within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, February 17, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, February 17, 2011, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: January 5, 2011.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-417 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### §8870. Costs and expenses a charge on prize property

(a) Costs and expenses allowed by the court incident to the bringing in, custody, preservation, insurance, and sale or other disposal of prize property are a charge upon the property and shall be paid from the proceeds thereof, unless the court decrees restitution free from such a charge.

(b) Charges for work and labor, materials furnished, or money paid must be supported by affidavit or vouchers.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 480, §7670; renumbered §8870, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7670(a) | 34 U.S.C. 1149. | R.S. 4639. |
| 7670(b) | 34 U.S.C. 1150 (2d sentence). | R.S. 4640 (2d sentence). |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7670 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### [§2369. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–355, title III, §3062(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3336]

Section, added Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VIII, §842(a), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2026; amended Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, §904(d)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1728, related to program for supervision and coordination of product evaluation activities within the Department of Defense.
### [§2435. Renumbered §4214]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Mark Anthony Dickey v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 835

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 39 2 144

Trial court: 1 80 th District Court of Harris County

On Ma y 26 , 2016 , we abate d and remanded this case to the trial court based on the

failure of appellant’s appointed counsel, K urt B. Wentz

, to file a brief on appellant’s

behalf. On June 13 , 201 6 , t he trial court held a hearing on our abatement order. The court

reporter has filed a reporter’s record of the June 13, 2016 hearing. The record reflects that

appellant wishes to continue to prosecut e his appeal. At the end of the hearing, the trial

court stated its belief that good cause does not exist to remove Kurt B. Wentz as

appellant’s counsel and that appellant’s brief was due no later than thirty days from the

date of the hearing

. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

Appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this Court no later than J ULY 13 , 2016

.

Appellee’s brief, if any, is due to be filed within 30 days of the filing of

appellant’s brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 21, 2016
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 374 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 157
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 374

                          [Report No. 106-465]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 10, 1999

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on or before the 
legislative day of Wednesday, November 17, 1999, for the Speaker to 
entertain motions to suspend the rules, provided that the object of any 
such motion is announced from the floor at least one hour before the 
motion is offered. In scheduling the consideration of legislation under 
this authority, the Speaker or his designee shall consult with the 
Minority Leader or his designee.
    Sec. 2. Provides that House Resolution 342 is laid on the table.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 157

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 374

                          [Report No. 106-465]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 10, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | COSL is Servicer under the Subservicing Agreement dated as of March 28, 2018 (the “Agreement”) by and between Capital One Bank (USA), National Association (“COBNA”) and COSL. |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | A review of the activities of COSL, as Servicer, during the period that is the subject of the Report and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, COSL, as Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| By:    | /s/ MICHAEL WASSMER |
|   |   |
| Name:  | Michael Wassmer |
| Title: | President, US Card |
H. Res. 584

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 21, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 4919) to amend the Foreign Assistance Act of

1961 and the Arms Export Control Act to make improvements to certain defense and security assistance provisions

under those Acts, to authorize the transfer of naval vessels

to certain foreign countries, and for other purposes. All

points of order against the conference report and against its

consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
H. Res. 484

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 3, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2957) to amend the Federal Water Pollution

Control Act to authorize funding to carry out certain water

quality restoration projects for Lake Pontchartrain Basin,

Louisiana, and for other purposes. The first reading of the

bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule

XIII are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general

debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute

rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute rec-
2

•HRES 484 EH

ommended by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now printed in the bill. The committee amendment

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of

the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of

rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1)

postpone until a time during further consideration in the

Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 484 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 425 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 170
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 425

                          [Report No. 106-505]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 29, 2000

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative 
day of Wednesday, March 8, 2000, for the Speaker to entertain motions 
to suspend the rules. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with 
the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter 
for consideration pursuant to this resolution.
                                                 House Calendar No. 170

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 425

                          [Report No. 106-505]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 29, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
### [§2537. Renumbered §4891]