alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), I, Charles A. French, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, that:





| | 1. |  | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    CHARLES A.
FRENCHCharles A. French President and Chief Financial Officer





November 14, 2002
(logo) Deloitte

 

 

**Deloitte& Touche LLP**

Suite1000

695Town Center Dr 

CostaMesa, CA 92626 

USA

 

Tel:+1714 436 7100

Fax:+1 714 436 7200

www.deloitte.com

 

 

**REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

ToPacific Life Insurance Company:

 

Wehave examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’sReport on Assessment of  Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria,that Pacific Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) complied with the relevantservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for the Securitized Commercial Mortgage LoansOperating Advisor Platform (the “Advisor Platform”), specifically criteria 1122(d)(1)(v),(d)(3)(i)(a-c) and (d)(4)(vii), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018,which management has determined to be applicable to the activities performed bythe Company with respect to the Advisor Platform. Appendix A to management’sassertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined bymanagement as constituting the Advisor Platform. Management is responsible forthe Company’s compliance with the relevant servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about theCompany’s compliance with the relevant servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of servicing activitiesrelated to the Advisor Platform, determining whether the Company performedthose selected activities in compliance with the relevant servicing criteriaduring the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selectedservicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by thisreport and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activitiesrelated to each specific asset-backed transaction included in the AdvisorPlatform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliancearising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified abovethat may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by theCompany during the period covered by this report. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the relevantservicing criteria.

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with theaforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December31, 2018 for the Securitized Commercial Mortgage Loans Operating AdvisorPlatform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

February26, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,856                   4,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,511                  14,544
<ALLOWANCES>                                       537                   2,300
<INVENTORY>                                     25,780                  24,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,481                  41,755
<PP&E>                                          30,536                  34,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,523                  14,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,553                  67,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,501                  66,485
<BONDS>                                        219,328                 219,989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           473                     473
<OTHER-SE>                                    (87,249)               (219,004)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,553                 286,474
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,330                 170,568
<CGS>                                          133,218                 131,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,218                 131,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,717                  20,396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (22,049)                (23,964)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,168)               (122,366)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       106                   (300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,274)               (122,066)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,274)               (122,066)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
#### § 39.137 May schools operate a language development program without a specific appropriation from Congress?

Yes, a school may operate a language development program without a specific appropriation from Congress, but any funds used for such a program must come from existing ISEP funds. When Congress specifically appropriates funds for Indian or Native languages, the factor to support the language development program will be no more than 0.25 WSU.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 527 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 239
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 527

                          [Report No. 106-681]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4201) to amend the 
   Communications Act of 1934 to clarify the service obligations of 
             noncommercial educational broadcast stations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2000

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4201) to amend the 
   Communications Act of 1934 to clarify the service obligations of 
             noncommercial educational broadcast stations.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4201) to amend the 
Communications Act of 1934 to clarify the service obligations of 
noncommercial educational broadcast stations. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the 
Committee on Commerce now printed in the bill shall be considered as 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, 
as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Commerce; (2) a further amendment 
in the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record 
pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII, if offered by representative Markey 
of Massachusetts or his designee, which shall be considered as read and 
shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.

                                                 House Calendar No. 239

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 527

                          [Report No. 106-681]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4201) to amend the 
   Communications Act of 1934 to clarify the service obligations of 
             noncommercial educational broadcast stations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 19, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form10-Q") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2009         /s/ Yaron Meerfeld
                                 ------------------------
                                 Yaron Meerfeld, Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: November 13, 2009         /s/Tzlil Peker
                                 ---------------------
                                 Tzlil Peker, Chief Financial Officer
                                 (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
# C_2006190EN.01002101.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/21

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 June 2006 — Achaiber Sing v Commission

(Case T-4/04) (1)

1

(Non-contractual liability of the Community - Animal health - Requirements for the import of birds - Agreement on the application of health and phyto-sanitary measures - Compensation for damage - Partial inadmissibility - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2006/C 190/36)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: R.K. Achaiber Sing (Leiden, Netherlands) (represented by: J. Wilgers and J. van Duin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Kuijper, T. van Rijn and M. van Heezik, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant owing to the application of Commission Decision 2000/666/EC of 16 October 2000 laying down the animal health requirements and the veterinary certification for the import of birds, other than poultry and the conditions for quarantine (OJ 2000 L 278, p. 26)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | The applicant shall pay the costs incurred by the Commission, including those relating to the plea of inadmissibility |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall pay the costs incurred by the Commission, including those relating to the plea of inadmissibility

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

1

---
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 365 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 154
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 365

                          [Report No. 106-461]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 76) 
waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the first 
 session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress with respect to any bill or 
     joint resolution making general appropriations or continuing 
                  appropriations for fiscal year 2000.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 1999

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 76) 
waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the first 
 session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress with respect to any bill or 
     joint resolution making general appropriations or continuing 
                  appropriations for fiscal year 2000.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 76) 
waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the first 
session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress with respect to any bill or 
joint resolution making general appropriations or continuing 
appropriations for fiscal year 2000. The joint resolution shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the joint 
resolution equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and 
the Minority Leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 154

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 365

                          [Report No. 106-461]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 76) 
waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the first 
 session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress with respect to any bill or 
     joint resolution making general appropriations or continuing 
                  appropriations for fiscal year 2000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 8, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
### §9802. Admiralty claims against the United States

(a) The Secretary of the Air Force may settle or compromise an admiralty claim against the United States for—

(1) damage caused by a vessel of, or in the service of, the Department of the Air Force or by other property under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Air Force;

(2) compensation for towage and salvage service, including contract salvage, rendered to a vessel of, or in the service of, the Department of the Air Force or to other property under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Air Force; or

(3) damage caused by a maritime tort committed by any agent or employee of the Department of the Air Force or by property under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Air Force.

(b) If a claim under subsection (a) is settled or compromised for $500,000 or less, the Secretary of the Air Force may pay it. If it is settled or compromised for more than $500,000, he shall certify it to Congress.

(c) In any case where the amount to be paid is not more than $100,000, the Secretary of the Air Force may delegate his authority under subsection (a) to any person in the Department of the Air Force designated by him.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 592; Pub. L. 89–67, July 7, 1965, 79 Stat. 212; Pub. L. 92–417, §1(6), Aug. 29, 1972, 86 Stat. 655; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XVI, §1633, Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1608.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9802(a)  9802(b)9802(c) | 10:1861 (less 35 words before 1st proviso, and less last proviso).10:1861 (last proviso).10:1866 (as applicable to 10:1861). | Oct. 20, 1951, ch. 524, §§1 (less 35 words before 1st proviso), 6 (as applicable to §1), 65 Stat. 572, 573. |

9802(b)

9802(c)

10:1861 (last proviso).

10:1866 (as applicable to 10:1861).

In subsection (a), the words "consider, ascertain, adjust, determine, compromise" are omitted as covered by the word "settle", as defined in section 9801 of this title. 10:1861 (1st proviso) is omitted as unnecessary, since other applicable claims laws are restated in this title. 10:1861 (2d proviso) is omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–189 substituted "$100,000" for "$10,000".

1972—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 92–417 substituted "Admiralty claims against the United States" for "Damage by United States vessels, towage and salvage of United States vessels" in section catchline, in text preceding par. (1), struck out requirement that the Secretary of the Air Force discharge his functions under the direction of the Secretary of Defense, in par. (1), inserted "or by other property under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Air Force", in par. (2), inserted "or to other property under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Air Force", and added par. (3).

1965—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 89–67 substituted "$10,000" for "$1,000".
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 320 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 320

  Recognizing the Korean War Veterans National Museum and Library in 
      Tuscola, Illinois, as a National Korean War Veterans Museum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 1999

Mr. Ewing submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the Korean War Veterans National Museum and Library in 
      Tuscola, Illinois, as a National Korean War Veterans Museum.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives hereby recognizes the 
Korean War Veterans National Museum and Library in Tuscola, Illinois, 
as a National Korean War Veterans Museum.
                                 <all>
```
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 391

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 18, 1999

Mr. FROST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 is hereby, elected to the following standing committees of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Baca of Cali5 fornia.

6 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Baca of California.

Æ
§ 20.704 Who conducts the hearing or appeal of a Bureau decision or action and what is the process? ( a ) The Superintendent or his/her designated representative conducts the hearing in an informal but orderly manner, records the hearing, and provides the applicant or recipient with a transcript of the hearing upon request.
( b ) The Superintendent or his/her designated representative must render a written decision within 10 days of the completion of the hearing. The written decision must include: ( 1 ) A written statement covering the evidence relied upon and reasons for the decision; and
( 2 ) The applicant's or recipient's right to appeal the Superintendent or his/her designated representative's decision pursuant to 25 CFR part 2 and request Bureau assistance in preparation of the appeal.
#### SELLERS v. HIGH POINT MEM. HOSP.

No. 104P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 299

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
# C_2006249EN.01000102.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/1

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 February 2006 — Giorgio Lebedef v Commission of the European Communitites

(Case C-268/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Rules on the levels, body, and procedures of consultation agreed between the majority of trade unions and staff associations and the Commission - Exclusion of the union ‘Action et Défense’ - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2006/C 249/02)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment delivered on 12 April 2005 by the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) in Case T-191/02 Lebedef v Commission, dismissing the action for annulment of the Commission's decision to repudiate the Agreement of 20 September 1974 on Relations between the Commission and the Trade Unions and Staff Associations, and to adopt again the Operational Rules on the consultation levels, the consultation body and related procedures agreed between the Commission and the majority of trade unions and staff associations on 19 January 2000, which had been annulled by the Court of First Instance in its judgment of 15 November 2001, in so far as they excluded the union ‘Action et Défense’ from the consultation body.

Lebedef

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Lebedef is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Lebedef is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 01.10.2006.

1

---