alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HUDSON
RESPIRATORY CARE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0                   2,771
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  35,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                 (1,071)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  30,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  71,792
<PP&E>                                               0                  45,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                (58,723)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 261,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                (32,651)
<BONDS>                                              0               (115,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                (37,539)
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                (92,158)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                     555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0               (261,346)
<SALES>                                       (31,811)                (72,618)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (31,811)                (72,618)
<CGS>                                           14,825                  37,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,242                  22,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   546                     605
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,584                   9,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    386                 (2,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)                   1,215
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                385                   1,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       385                   1,214
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
No. 47,943

#### State of Kansas *ex rel.*Keith Sanborn, District Attorney for the 18th Judicial District of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. F. Kent Kalb, (substituted party for James T. McDonald), Secretary, Department of Revenue, State of Kansas, *Appellant.*

(546 P. 2d 1406)

Filed March 6, 1976.

(For original opinion see *State, ex rel., v. Kalb,*218 Kan. 459, 543 P. 2d 872.)

*Donald R. Hoffman,*assistant attorney general, argued the cause, and *Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, and *George F. Waters,*assistant attorney general, were on the brief for the appellant.

*Keith Sanborn,*district attorney, argued the cause, and *Stephen M. Joseph,*assistant district attorney, was with him on the brief for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Owsley, J.:

Our opinion in this case was filed December 13, 1975. At page 466, it was said:

> “. . . In addition, we construe'‘bona fide . . . fraternal’ to require an applicant to satisfy the issuing agency it is an organization with a representative form of government and either that (1) it operates under the lodge system with a ritualistic form of work; (2) it is organized to promote the payment of life, sickness, .accident, or other insurance benefits to its members; or (3) it is organized to carry on some worthy civic or service purpose.”

Appellee’s motion seeks modification of the above statement by adding the words “and operated” after the word “organized” in the two instances where it appears.

The motion is supported by a memorandum which sets forth the argument of appellee. The memorandum points out that the language is subject to two inconsistent constructions; namely, (1) an organization need only be organized for fraternal purposes and need not be engaged in those purposes, or (2) an organization need be organized *and operated*for those fraternal purposes, to be deemed a “bona fide . . . fraternal” organization. Appellee’s argument has merit. In order to clarify the decision of this court and prevent any misunderstanding as to the requirements of a “bona fide . . . fraternal” organization, the above quoted statement is stricken from the opinion and the following is inserted in its place:

> “. . . In addition, we construe ‘bona fide . . . fraternal’ to require an applicant to satisfy the issuing agency it is an organization with a representa*232tive form of government and either that (1) it operates under the lodge system with a ritualistic form of work; (2) it is organized and operated to promote the payment of life, sickness), accident, or other insurance benefits to its members; or (3) it is organized and operated to carry on some worthy civic or service purpose.”

We adhere to our original opinion in all other respects.
California Environmental Protection Agency 

AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

Executive Order S-15-005 

WHEREAS, the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (District) Ozone Emergency 

Episode Plan was adopted by the District on June 11, 2015; 

WHEREAS, the District is authorized by California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) 

section 40001 to adopt and enforce the plan; 

WHEREAS, the plan has been submitted to the Air Resources Board (ARB) for 

inclusion in the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) as a reasonably available 

control measure for limiting emissions of air pollutants within the district; 

WHEREAS, ARB has determined that this plan is necessary to meet requirements of 

section 11 O(a)(2)(G) of the federal Clean Air Act; and 

WHEREAS, ARB is authorized by H&SC sections 39601 , 39602, and 41650 through 

41652 to adopt district plans as revisions to the SIP. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that ARB hereby adopts the District's plan as a revision 

to the SIP. 

I certify, pursuant to 40 CFR 51 .102(f), that the Placer County Air Pollution Control 

District Ozone Emergency Episode Plan of was adopted after notice and public 

hearings as required by 40 CFR 51.102(a) and 51 .102(d). 

Executed in Sacramento, California, this t.S ~ day of July, 2015. 

ichard W. C rey 

Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

          - 33 CFR Part 334

# AGENCY:

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 4, 2011 (76 FR 6327), establishing a restricted area in the waters of the Potomac River extending offshore from the Marine Corps Air Facility (MCAF) at Marine Corps Base Quantico (MCB Quantico), located in Quantico, Virginia.                    

# DATES:

Effective March 7, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. David Olson, Headquarters, Operations and Regulatory Community of Practice, Washington, DC at 202-761-4922 or Mr. Steve Elinsky, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District, Regulatory Branch, at 410-962-4503 or by e-mail at                         *steve.elinsky@usace.army.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2011-2478 appearing on page 6327 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Friday, February 4, 2011, the following correction is made:                

§ 334.235 

On page 6328, in the third column, in § 334.235, paragraph (b)(2), the sentence “In addition, lighted, floating, small craft intrusion barriers will be placed across the Chopawamsic Creek channel at the entrance to the channel from the Potomac River and immediately west of the CSX railroad bridge.” is corrected to read “In addition, floating small craft intrusion barriers marked with reflective material will be placed across the Chopawamsic Creek channel at the entrance to the channel from the Potomac River and immediately west of the CSX railroad bridge.”

Dated: February 22, 2011.

Jonathan A. Davis,

Deputy Chief, Operations and Regulatory  Directorate of Civil Works.

[FR Doc. 2011-4277 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
### §8876. Compensation of prize commissioners and special prize commissioners

(a) Naval prize commissioners and naval special prize commissioners may not receive compensation for their services in prize causes other than that to which they are entitled as officers of the Navy.

(b) Prize commissioners and special prize commissioners, except naval prize commissioners and naval special prize commissioners, are entitled to just and suitable compensation for their services in prize causes. The amount of compensation in each cause shall be determined by the court and allowed as costs.

(c) Annually, on the anniversary of his appointment, each prize commissioner and special prize commissioner, except a naval prize commissioner or a naval special prize commissioner, shall submit to the Attorney General an account of all amounts received for his services in prize causes within the previous year. Of the amounts reported, each such commissioner may retain not more than $3,000, which is in full satisfaction for all his services in prize causes for that year. He shall pay any excess over that amount into the Treasury.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 482, §7676; renumbered §8876, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7676(a) | 34 U.S.C. 1137 (as applicable to compensation of naval prize commissioner). | R.S. 4621 (as applicable to compensation of naval prize commissioner); Nov. 14, 1945, ch. 472, §2, 59 Stat. 581. |
| | 34 U.S.C. 1163 (as applicable to compensation of naval special prize commissioner). | Aug. 18, 1942, ch. 553, §5 (as applicable to compensation of naval special prize commissioner), 56 Stat. 746. |
| 7676(b) | 34 U.S.C. 1154. | R.S. 4646. |
| 7676(c) | 34 U.S.C. 1155. | R.S. 4647. |

In subsection (c) the words "on the anniversary of his appointment" are inserted for clarity, as "year" in the context of this section means a year of service as prize commissioner. The words "and shall be credited to the fund for paying naval pensions" are omitted because the Act of June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §9, 48 Stat. 1229, abolished the naval pension fund and provided that moneys previously required to be paid into it should be deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts. The words "as miscellaneous receipts" are omitted as surplusage. The word "amounts" is substituted for the word "sums".

34 U.S.C. 1154 and 1155 and this section reflect the Act of May 28, 1896, ch. 252, §6, 29 Stat. 179, 180, which provided that United States attorneys should receive fixed annual salaries in lieu of the fees and emoluments previously authorized.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7676 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 309.13 What are examples of other weaving and textiles that are Indian products? ( a ) Weavings and textiles made by an Indian using a wide variety of media, including, but not limited to, cornhusk, raffia, tule, horsehair, cotton, wool, fiber, linen, rabbit skin, feather, bison fur, and qiviut (musk ox) wool, are Indian products.
( b ) Specific examples include, but are not limited to: corn husk bags, twined yarn bags, cotton mantas, willow cradle boards, horsehair hatbands, Chiefs Blankets, Two Grey Hills rugs, horse blankets, finger woven sashes, brocade table runners, star quilts, pictorial appliqué wall hangings, fiber woven bags, embroidered dance shawls, rabbit skin blankets, and feather blankets.
[68 FR 35170, June 12, 2003]
§ 47.5 What is the school supervisor responsible for? Each Bureau-operated school's school supervisor has the responsibilities in this section. The school supervisor must do all of the following: ( a ) Ensure that the Bureau-operated school spends funds in accordance with the local educational financial plan, as ratified or amended by the school board;
( b ) Sign all documents required to obligate or pay funds or to record receipt of goods and services;
( c ) Report at least quarterly to the local school board on the amounts spent, obligated, and currently remaining in funds budgeted for each program in the local educational financial plan;
( d ) Recommend changes in budget amounts to carry out the local educational financial plan, and incorporate these changes in the budget as ratified by the local school board, subject to provisions for appeal and overturn; and
( e ) Maintain expenditure records in accordance with financial planning system procedures.
# C_2006243EN.01000302.xml

| 10.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4310 — Phelps Dodge/INCO)

(2006/C 243/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4310. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4310. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3830]



[[Page 9808]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a 
Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, 
Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 1201 W. 8th at Georgia Ave., Deer 
Park, TX 77536, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test 
petroleum and petroleum products in accordance with the provisions of 
19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity 
to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and 
receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or 
approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires 
regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited 
or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c6f6e7c22606d6e647d4c68647f226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2c1c0d28ccec3c0cad3e2c6cad18cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 08, 
2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for 
September 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 10, 2011.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-3830 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 33.1






REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED ISSUERS






AEP Texas Central Company (the "Servicer"), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:






(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Transition Bonds, Series A: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (3)(ii) (allocation and remittance), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(x) (funds held in trust), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);




(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;




(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2013 and for the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and




(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent  registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2013 and for the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.




Date: March 28, 2014




AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY,


as Servicer








/s/ Julia A. Sloat


Name:  Julia A. Sloat


Title: Treasurer and Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function, AEP Texas Central Company, as Servicer
§ 256.5 What is the Housing Improvement Program? The HIP is a safety-net program that provides grants for the cost of services to repair, renovate, or replace existing housing and/or provide housing. The program provides grants to the neediest of the needy Indian families who: ( a ) Live in substandard housing or are homeless; and
( b ) Have no other resource for assistance.
Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = EWR

Holder = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2011 (History & Current)

02/23/2015 07:50:13

Query Parameters:
02/23/2015 07:50:13

Carrier

Regular Totals (Holders)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2011 (History & Current)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 54 

ACA AIR CANADA 24

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 2

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6 

CKS KALITTA FLYING SERVICES (AMERICAN INT'L 1

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 881

CSQ IBC AIRWAYS 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 64

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 9

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 2

EVA EVA AIRLINES 2

FDX FED EX 8

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 29 

POE PORTER AIRLINES 20

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 2

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINE 8

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 2

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 13

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 33

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5

USA US AIRWAYS 31

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

WJA WESTJET 2

Page 2