alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Enterprises Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                       /s/ Roy Piceni
                       ---------------------------------
                       Roy Piceni
                       President and Chief Executive Officer

                       August 22, 2005
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C1

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of May 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among, UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special
Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Trimont
Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects during the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2015
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.52 Grant suspension. ( a ) When a grantee has materially failed to comply and remains out of compliance with the terms and conditions of the grant, the grants officer may, after reasonable notice to the grantee and the provision of requested technical assistance, suspend the grant. The notice preceding the suspension shall include the effective date of the suspension, the corrective measures necessary for reinstatement of the grant and, if there is no immediate threat to safety, a reasonable timeframe for corrective action prior to actual suspension.
( b ) No obligation incurred by the grantee during the period of suspension shall be allowable under the suspended grant, except that the grants officer may at his/her discretion allow necessary and proper costs which the grantee could not reasonably avoid during the period of suspension if such costs would otherwise be allowable under the applicable cost principles.
( c ) Appropriate adjustments to the payments under the suspended grant will be made either by withholding the payments or by not allowing the grantee credit for disbursements which the grantee may make in liquidation of unauthorized obligations the grantee incurs during the period of suspension.
( d ) Suspension shall remain in effect until the grantee has taken corrective action to the satisfaction of the grants officer, or given assurances satisfactory to the grants officer that corrective action will be taken, or until the grants officer cancels the grant.
#### § 162.221 How should the land be described in an agricultural lease?

An agricultural lease should describe the leased premises by reference to a public or private survey, if possible. If the land cannot be so described, the lease must include a legal description or other description that is sufficient to identify the leased premises, subject to our approval. Where there are undivided interests owned in fee status, the aggregate portion of trust and restricted interests should be identified in the description of the leased premises.
### §2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security space

(a) Notice Required.—The Commander of the United States Space Command shall, with respect to each intentional attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national security space capability, provide to the appropriate congressional committees—

(1) not later than 48 hours after the Commander determines that there is reason to believe such attempt occurred, notice of such attempt; and

(2) not later than 10 days after the date on which the Commander determines that there is reason to believe such attempt occurred, a notification described in subsection (b) with respect to such attempt.

(b) Notification Description.—A notification described in this subsection is a written notification that includes—

(1) the name and a brief description of the national security space capability that was impacted by an attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national security space capability;

(2) a description of such attempt, including the foreign actor, the date and time of such attempt, and any related capability outage and the mission impact of such outage; and

(3) any other information the Commander considers relevant.

(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.—In this section, the term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(1) the congressional defense committees; and

(2) with respect to a notice or notification related to an attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national security space capability that is intelligence-related, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

(Added Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title IX, §911(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 823; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVI, §1604(d), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4044.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2278, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 127, related to purchases of sample aircraft, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §821(a)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1704.

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "Space Command" for "Strategic Command".
### §7101. Officers on active duty: minimum strength based on requirements

(a) The Secretary of the Army shall ensure that the strength at the end of each fiscal year of officers on active duty is sufficient to enable the Army to meet at least that percentage of the programmed manpower structure for officers for the active component of the Army that is provided for in the most recent Defense Planning Guidance issued by the Secretary of Defense.

(b) The number of officers on active duty shall be counted for purposes of this section in the same manner as applies under section 115(a)(1) of this title.

(c) In this section:

(1) The term "programmed manpower structure" means the aggregation of billets describing the full manpower requirements for units and organizations in the programmed force structure.

(2) The term "programmed force structure" means the set of units and organizations that exist in the current year and that is planned to exist in each future year under the then-current Future-Years Defense Program.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §505(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 295, §3201; amended Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(f)(37), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1954; renumbered §7101, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7101 was renumbered section 8591 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3201 of this title as this section.

2013—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–239 struck out "(beginning with fiscal year 1999)" after "shall ensure that".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Assistance in Accomplishing Requirement

Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §505(b), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 296, as amended by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §809(b)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1840, provided that: "The Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Army sufficient personnel and financial resources to enable the Army to meet the requirement specified in section 7101 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)."
#### § 2.821 May I request an extension of time to submit my Appeal?

No. You must submit the Appeal within 30 calendar days of the issuance of the Decision. The reviewing official will not grant an extension of time to submit your appeal of a Decision.
State of Delaware
                   Office of the Secretary of State Page 1


     I, EDWARD J. FREEL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
BUSINESS TRUST REGISTARATION OF "PREMIER AUTO TRUST 1998-2", FILED IN THIS
OFFICE ON THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH, A.D. 1998, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M.










                                         /s/ Edward J. Freel
                           [SEAL]     -------------------------------------
                                         Edward J. Freel, Secretary of State


2871375 8100                               AUTHENTICATION: 8971628
981097824                                          DATE: 03-13-98





<PAGE>




                         CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                 OF
                       PREMIER AUTO TRUST 1998-2

          THIS Certificate of Trust of Premier Auto Trust 1998-2 (the
"Trust"), dated March 13, 1998, is being duly executed and filed by Chase
Manhattan Bank Delaware, a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form
a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del C ss 3801 et
seq).

          1. Name: The name of the business trust formed hereby is Premier
Auto Trust 1998-2.

          2. Delaware Trustee: The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware, 1201
Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate Trustee
Administration Department.

          3. Effective Date: This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the
Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above
written.



                      CHASE MANHATTAN BANK DELAWARE, not in
                      its individual capacity but solely as Owner Trustee
                      under the Trust Agreement dated as of March 13, 1998.
                      
                      
                      By: /s/ JJ Cashin
                          -----------------------------
                      Name:     JOHN J. CASHIN
                      Title:    VICE-PRESIDENT
           


                                                 STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                 SECRETARY 0F STATE
                                              DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                              FILED 08:30 AM 03/13/1998
                                                981097824 -- 2871375
H. Res. 305

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 28, 1999.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 68)

making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000,

and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and

(2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 43.23 Conduct of employees. ( a ) Employees whose duties require handling of student records shall, at all times, take care to protect the integrity, security, and confidentiality of these records.
( b ) No employee of the educational institution may disclose student records unless disclosure is permitted under § 43.14 or made to the parent of the student or eligible student to whom the record pertains.
( c ) No employee of the educational institution may alter or destroy a student record, unless: ( 1 ) Alteration or destruction is properly undertaken in the course of the employee's regular duties, or
( 2 ) Alteration or destruction is required by an authorized administrative decision or the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction.
( d ) The educational institution responsible for a system of student records shall be responsible for assuring that employees with access to the system are made aware of the requirements of this section.
#### § 173.3 Enforcement.

The project engineer shall enforce these and all project regulations now or hereafter promulgated by the Secretary. Willful violation or failure to comply with the provisions of this part and all proper orders of the project engineer shall be cause for revocation of the permit by the Secretary who shall be the judge of what constitutes such violation. The project engineer may suspend any permit for cause. The project engineer shall, immediately after suspending a permit, submit to the Secretary through the Commissioner of Indian Affairs a detailed report of the case, accompanied by his reasons for the action and his recommendations, for final action by the Secretary.
# C_2006245EN.01000401.xml

| 12.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 October 2006

(2006/C 245/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2543 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4555 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67575 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2560 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5932 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4180 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5767 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,205 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,36 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9098 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5055 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,60 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 36,870 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8725 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6830 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4239 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7749 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8987 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9911 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 201,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7054 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9277 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4212 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 567,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6353 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,740 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,8030 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,034 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2543

JPY

Japanese yen

149,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4555

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67575

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2560

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5932

ISK

Iceland króna

86,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4180

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5767

CZK

Czech koruna

28,205

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,36

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9098

RON

Romanian leu

3,5055

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,60

SKK

Slovak koruna

36,870

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8725

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6830

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4239

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7749

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8987

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9911

KRW

South Korean won

1 201,93

ZAR

South African rand

9,7054

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9277

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4212

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 567,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6353

PHP

Philippine peso

62,740

RUB

Russian rouble

33,8030

THB

Thai baht

47,034

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2006204EN.01000101.xml

| 26.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 August 2006

(2006/C 204/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2762 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4608 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67620 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2231 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5809 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,36 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0655 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5761 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,175 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9259 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5253 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,58 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,730 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8882 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6797 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4122 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9280 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0083 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0149 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 227,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1118 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1794 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3050 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 654,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,696 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,581 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1960 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,072 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2762

JPY

Japanese yen

149,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4608

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67620

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2231

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5809

ISK

Iceland króna

89,36

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0655

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5761

CZK

Czech koruna

28,175

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9259

RON

Romanian leu

3,5253

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,58

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,730

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8882

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6797

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4122

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9280

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0083

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0149

KRW

South Korean won

1 227,64

ZAR

South African rand

9,1118

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1794

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3050

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 654,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,696

PHP

Philippine peso

65,581

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1960

THB

Thai baht

48,072

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 12, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133695 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133695 COA: 275627 Allegan CC: 05-014347-FC DESTREY SHANE McCOY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 22, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered . We DIRECT appellate counsel, David G. Grunst (P36420), to file a s upplemental brief addressing the reason(s) for his failure to timely file the defendant's delayed application fo r leave to appeal in the Court of Appeals, which led to administrative di smissal of the application on jurisdictional grounds. Counsel shall file the supplemental brief within 28 da ys of the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

l0905 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 12, 2007

Clerk
(logo) pwc

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*LoanManagement System (the “Platform”), as of December31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Companyhas determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform.Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testingof selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteriaas of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platformis fairly stated,in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 25, 2016

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106 

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*