alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 1 - A lexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005 202.842.4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

July 20, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch Director, Office of International Aviation Brian Hedberg Assistant Director U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Notice of Delta Air Lines Regarding Brazil Frequency Utilization and Intent to Rely on Route Integration Authority.

Dear Mssrs Gretch and Hedberg:

Delta intends to rely on its blanket route integration authority to institute new service between Orlando and Sao Paulo, effective December 2, 2015, and Orlando and Brasilia, effective December 19, 2015.

Delta will fund its 4x weekly Orlando-Sao Paulo flights with 4 unrestricted Atlanta-Sao Paulo frequencies awarded by Order 97-4-13, which are usable on any U.S.-Brazil route. 1 Delta willfund its 4x weekly Orlando-Brasilia service with the remaining 3 of the 7 unrestricted AtlantaSao Paulo frequencies and 1 additional frequency trans ferred earlier this year from American to Delta, 2 currently being used to operate Atlanta-Brasilia service. 4 of the remaining frequencies transferred from American are being used for Atlanta-Rio de Janeiro service.

Delta wishes to inform the Department of its intent to return 2 of 3 frequencies awarded by Notice of Action Taken August 2, 2010 in Docket OST-2010-0186 for Atlanta-Rio de Janeiro service and the remaining 2 frequencies awarded by Notice of Action Taken May 13, 2011 in Docket OST-2011-0085 3 , which have been replaced by the aforementioned American/Delta transfer frequencies. Finally, Delta will return 2 of the 7 American transfer frequencies, which are currently unused.

Sincerely,

Alexander Van der Bellen

1 Order 2004-6-25 (“We . . . grant the . . . U.S. carri ers designated for combinati on services in the U.S.- Brazil markets flexibility to use their allocated frequenc ies in markets where the carriers hold requisite underlying authority.”)
2 See FAA/DOT approval of Delta/US Airways transaction, 76 Fed. Reg. 63702 (Docket FAA-2010-0109).
3 Delta had previously returned 2 of 3 frequencies awarded by this NOAT.Delta Air Lines, Inc. July 20, 2015 Page 2

cc: Brent Kruger

Dockets: OST-1997-2016 OST-2002-11711 FAA-2010-0109 OST-2010-0186 OST-2011-0085

A copy of the foregoing letter has been served this 20 th day of July, 2015, upon the following
persons via email:

Air Carrier Name Email Address

American Howard Kass howard.kass@aa.com American Robert Wirick robert.wirick@aa.com United Dan Weiss dan.weiss@united.com

Info info@airlineinfo.com
### Aeromagnetic, Bouguer gravity, and generalized geologic studies of the Great Falls-Mission Range area, northwestern Montana

By: M. Dean KleinkopfMelville Rhodes Mudge

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp726A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (2015 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (15052 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (3383 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (2186 pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Aeromagnetic map of the Great Falls-Brown Lake area, northwestern Montana(1967)                                    

                                        Preliminary geologic map of the Great Falls-Browns Lake area, northwestern Montana(1968)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### Metamorphic rocks of the Quadrilatero Ferrifero, Minas Gerais, Brazil

By: Norman Herz

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp641C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2006232EN.01000101.xml

| 27.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 September 2006

(2006/C 232/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2695 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,83 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4591 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66950 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2895 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5776 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,05 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3135 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5767 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,444 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,08 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9583 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5422 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,400 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9430 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6859 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4149 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8852 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8974 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0159 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 198,60 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7550 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0424 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4115 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 684,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,673 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,869 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9970 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,606 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2695

JPY

Japanese yen

147,83

DKK

Danish krone

7,4591

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66950

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2895

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5776

ISK

Iceland króna

89,05

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3135

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5767

CZK

Czech koruna

28,444

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,08

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9583

RON

Romanian leu

3,5422

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,400

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9430

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6859

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4149

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8852

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8974

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0159

KRW

South Korean won

1 198,60

ZAR

South African rand

9,7550

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0424

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4115

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 684,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,673

PHP

Philippine peso

63,869

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9970

THB

Thai baht

47,606

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 573.3 Notice of violation. ( a ) The Chair may issue a notice of violation to any person for violations of any provision of the Act or this chapter, or of any tribal ordinance or resolution approved by the Chair under part 522 of this chapter.
( b ) A notice of violation shall contain: ( 1 ) A citation to the federal or tribal requirement that has been or is being violated;
( 2 ) A description of the circumstances surrounding the violation, set forth in common and concise language;
( 3 ) Measures required to correct the violation;
( 4 ) A reasonable time for correction, if the respondent cannot take measures to correct the violation immediately; and
( 5 ) Notice of rights of appeal.
[58 FR 5844, Jan. 22, 1993, as amended at 77 FR 47519, Aug. 9, 2012]
# C_2006249EN.01000201.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/2

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2006 — Ursula Voß v Land Berlin, Other party to the proceedings: The representative of the national interest at the Bundesverwaltungsgericht

(Case C-300/06)

(2006/C 249/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ursula Voß

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Berlin

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings: The representative of the national interest at the Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Other party to the proceedings

Question referred

Does Article 141 EC preclude national legislation under which remuneration for additional work which takes place outside of normal working hours is paid at the same rate with regard to full-time as well as part-time public servants and that rate is lower than the pro-rata remuneration allotted to full-time public servants as regards a period of equal length within normal working hours if it is predominantly women who are employed part-time?

---
H. Res. 296

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 24, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1487) to provide for public participation in the

declaration of national monuments under the Act popularly

known as the Antiquities Act of 1906. The first reading of

the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Resources. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under

the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Resources now

printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature

of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the
2

•HRES 296 EH

basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII.

Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone

until a time during further consideration in the Committee of

the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment;

and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another

electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the

minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series

of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except

one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
### §9441. Faculty and other officers: leaves of absence

The Superintendent of the Academy may grant a leave of absence for the period of the suspension of the ordinary academic studies, without deduction of pay or allowances, to a professor, assistant professor, instructor, or other officer of the Academy.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 563, §9341; renumbered §9441, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(a)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9341 | 10:1144. | R.S. 1330. |

The words "under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army" are omitted, since the Secretary has inherent authority to issue regulations appropriate to exercising his statutory functions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9441 was renumbered section 9491 of this title.

Another prior section 9441, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 572; Pub. L. 96–342, title X, §1007(a), (b)(1), Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1121, 1122; Pub. L 96–513, title V, §514(12), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2935; Pub. L. 98–525, title XV, §1533(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2632; Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1303(a)(28), title XIV, §1458(a), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 740, 763; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title XIII, §1365(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 4002; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title X, §1062, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2847; Pub. L. 105–225, §4(a)(3), Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1499, related to Civil Air Patrol status, support by Air Force, and employment, prior to the general amendment of former chapter 909 (now 959) of this title by Pub. L. 106–398.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 9341 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
**MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION**
**EXHIBIT 11**
**STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE**                   Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended   December 31,  December 31,   2004  2003  2004  2003 Net Income $233,616  $117,721  $473,281  $664,598                               Weighted average common sharesoutstanding for basic computation  372,600   372,600   372,600   372,600                               Basic earnings per share $0.63  $0.32  $1.27  $1.78                               Weighted average common sharesoutstanding for basic computation  372,600   372,600   372,600   372,600                  Common stock equivalents due todilutive effect of stock options  —   —   —   —                               Weighted average common shares andequivalents outstanding fordiluted computation  372,600   372,600   372,600   372,600                               Diluted earnings per share $0.63  $0.32  $1.27  $1.78
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1647
In Re: MUZIO B. ROBERTO and MARY K. ROBERTO, Debtors.

_________________________ MUZIO B. ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO, Debtors - Appellants, versus JOSEPH NAPOLI; MARION NAPOLI, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-2831-DKC, BK-98-12440, AP-98-1A445) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Muzio B. Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se. Matthew Wilson Black, Jr., HEENEY, ARMSTRONG & HEENEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 We deny the Napolis’ motion for summary affirmance, motion for sanctions, and motion to consolidate. 2 Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on April 8, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on April 19, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Muzio and Mary Roberto appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s orders granting the Napolis’ motion for relief from automatic stay. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. 1 See Roberto v. Napoli , Nos. CA-98-2831-DKC; BK-98-12440 (D. Md. Apr. 19, 1999). 2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 41.51 What is the scope of this subpart?

The regulations in this subpart are applicable to the provision of financial assistance to Diné College pursuant to NCCA, title II of the TCCUA.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 87]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 1277]]

Public Law 115-87
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To ensure that the Federal Emergency Management Agency's current efforts 
      to modernize its grant management system includes applicant 
accessibility and transparency, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 21, 
                         2017 -  [H.R. 1679]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: FEMA 
Accountability, Modernization and Transparency Act of 2017. 42 USC 5121 
note. 42 USC 5121 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FEMA Accountability, Modernization 
and Transparency Act of 2017''.
SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency shall ensure the ongoing modernization of the grant 
systems for the administration of assistance under the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et 
seq.) includes the following:
            (1) <<NOTE: Online information.>>  An online interface, 
        including online assistance, for applicants to complete 
        application forms, submit materials, and access the status of 
        applications.
            (2) Mechanisms to eliminate duplication of benefits.
            (3) If appropriate, enable the sharing of information among 
        agencies and with State, local, and tribal governments, to 
        eliminate the need to file multiple applications and speed 
        disaster recovery.
            (4) Any additional tools the Administrator determines will 
        improve the implementation of this section.

    (b) Implementation.--To the extent practicable, the Administrator 
shall deliver the system capabilities described in subsection (a) in 
increments or iterations as working components for applicant use.
SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED.

    No additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements of 
this Act. Such requirements shall be carried out using amounts otherwise 
authorized.

    Approved November 21, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1679:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-107 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 115-159 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            May 2, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 13, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 273.159 If the existing contracting party reported a decrease of eligible Indian students, how will funding be reduced?

Except as provided in § 273.140(c) and (d) of this part, for four fiscal years following the date of enactment of the JOM Modernization Act (December 31, 2018) an existing contracting party's funding will not be reduced to a level that is less than the amount of funding per eligible Indian student that the existing contracting party received for Fiscal Year 2017 (the fiscal year preceding the date of enactment of the Johnson-O'Malley Modernization Act).
EX-35.2
(logo) FIRST REPUBLIC BANK
It's a privilege to serve you

Feb 28, 2013

Servicer Compliance Statement
For SEMT 2012-2


(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the immediately preceding
calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement and the Reconstitution
Agreement for the above referenced trust during such period has been made under
such officer's supervision, and
(ii) To the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the
Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the
Reconstitution Agreement for the above referened trust in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.

First Republic Bank

/s/ Lionel Antunes
Lionel Antunes
Vice President of Residential Lending
February 28, 2013

San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego
Portland  Boston  Greenwich  New York


111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR
(800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413

CONVENIENT INTERNET BANKING AT www.firstrepublic.com * MEMBER FDIC
#### § 39.503 How can a school use contingency funds?

Contingency funds can be used only for education services and programs, including repair of educational facilities.
#### § 518.14 May a tribe request a hearing on the Commission's proposal to revoke its certificate of self-regulation?

Yes. A tribe may request a hearing regarding the Office of Self-Regulation's recommendation that the Commission revoke a certificate of self-regulation. Such a request shall be filed with the Commission pursuant to part 584 of this chapter. Failure to request a hearing within the time provided by part 584 of this chapter shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing. At any hearing where the Commission considers revoking a certificate, the Office of Self-Regulation bears the burden of proof to support its recommendation by a preponderance of the evidence. The decision to revoke a certificate is a final agency action and is appealable to Federal District Court pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2714.

[87 FR 62987, Oct. 18, 2022]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROY WINDOM,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 108 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.