Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices 10409 

31. Department of State, Bureau of 

Diplomatic Security (N1–59–10–25, 2 

items, 2 temporary items). Records of 

the Diplomatic Security Command 

Center’s initial reporting on domestic 

and overseas security incidents, 

including brief summaries of possible 

security incidents and daily multiplesource synopses of events and concerns 

in countries around the world. 

Permanent, substantive reports on 

security concerns and incidents are 

captured elsewhere in the bureau’s 

records. 

32. Department of Transportation, 

Federal Highway Administration (N1– 

406–09–26, 22 items, 20 temporary 

items). Planning and program 

development records of the Federal Aid 

program, including airport access files, 

annual statistical data, Appalachian 

development highway system program 

records, certification of public mileage, 

coastal zone management files, coal 

haul road study files, smart growth files, 

economic studies and surveys, Statewide transportation improvement 

program and transportation 

improvement plans files, Federal Aid 

system files, map files, metropolitan 

planning organizations files, State-wide 

planning and research status reports, 

public transportation files, nonmotorized needs files, State obligations, 

highway systems correspondence, State 

traffic count data and size and weight 

program files. Proposed for permanent 

retention are planning and research 

subject files and National Scenic 

Byways studies. 

33. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Agency-wide (N1–412–10–2, 2 items, 2 

temporary items). Case files of the 

Environmental Alternative Dispute 

Resolution Program. 

34. Export-Import Bank of the United 

States, Agency-wide (N1–275–10–7, 1 

item, 1 temporary item). Copies of 

Department of State cables used by the 

agency for informational purposes. 

35. National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, Agency-wide (N1–255– 

09–2, 1 item, 1 temporary item). Records 

relating to general employee suggestions 

including background papers, 

suggestions, approvals, disapprovals, 

and review processes. 

36. National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, Agency-wide (N1–255– 

10–3, 6 items, 5 temporary items). 

Records relating to the agency’s 

education programs including education 

packages, project descriptions, funding 

sources, participant records, and survey 

responses. Proposed for permanent 

retention are curriculum materials. 

Dated: February 17, 2011. 

Michael J. Kurtz, 

Assistant Archivist for Records Services— 

Washington, DC. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4264 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7515–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 50–346; NRC–2010–0253] 

License No. NPF–3; FirstEnergy 

Nuclear Operating Company Notice of 

Issuance of Director’s Decision 

Notice is hereby given that the 

Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation of the U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission (NRC), has 

issued a Director’s Decision with regard 

to a petition dated April 5, 2010, filed 

by David Lochbaum, hereafter referred 

to as the ‘‘Petitioner.’’ The petition 

concerns the operation of the DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 

(DBNPS). 

The petition requested that the NRC 

issue a Show Cause Order, or 

comparable enforcement action, 

preventing the DBNPS from restarting 

following the shutdown in February 

2010, until adequate protection 

standards were met. 

As the basis for the April 5, 2010, 

request, the Petitioner states that 

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company 

(the licensee for DBNPS) has violated 

Federal regulations and the explicit 

conditions of its operating license by 

operating for longer than 6 hours with 

pressure boundary leakage. The 

Petitioner considers such operation to 

be potentially unsafe and to be in 

violation of Federal regulations. To 

support the Petitioner’s belief that the 

facility is prohibited from operating 

longer than 6 hours with pressure 

boundary leakage, the petition 

references the facility operating license; 

the technical specifications for DBNPS; 

Title 10 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (10 CFR) part 50, ‘‘Domestic 

Licensing of Production and Utilization 

Facilities,’’ Appendix A, ‘‘General 

Design Criteria for Nuclear Power 

Plants’’; and the Standard Technical 

Specifications. 

The petition of April 5, 2010, states 

that the licensee for DBNPS has 

repeatedly violated Federal regulations 

and the explicit conditions of its 

operating license by operating the 

reactor longer than 6 hours with 

pressure boundary leakage. In doing so, 

the Petitioner states that the public was 

exposed to elevated and undue risk. The 

NRC’s regulations and the operating 

license the NRC issued for DBNPS 

define adequate protection standards, 

which include zero reactor coolant 

pressure boundary leakage during 

operation, with the requirement to shut 

down the reactor within 6 hours if such 

leakage exists. The Petitioner states that 

with regard to the DBNPS, evidence 

demonstrates that the adequate 

protection standard was not met on 

multiple occasions and that it is 

imperative for the NRC to act now to 

protect the public. 

The NRC sent a copy of the proposed 

Director’s Decision to the Petitioner and 

to the licensee on November 10, 2010. 

The Petitioner responded with 

comments on November 23, 2010, and 

the licensee did not provide comments. 

The final Director’s Decision includes a 

summary of the comments and the NRC 

staff’s response to them. 

The Director of the Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation has determined that 

the request to issue a Show Cause Order 

or comparable enforcement-related 

action to the licensee for DBNPS is 

denied. The Director’s Decision [DD– 

11–02] pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206, 

‘‘Requests for Action under This 

Subpart,’’ explains the reasons for this 

decision. The complete text of the 

Director’s Decision is available for 

inspection in the Agencywide 

Documents Access and Management 

System at the Commission’s Public 

Document Room, located at One White 

Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 

11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 

Rockville, Maryland, and from the 

ADAMS Public Library component on 

the NRC’s Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/ 

reading-rm/adams.html (the Public 

Electronic Reading Room), ADAMS 

Accession No. ML110250189). 

In summary, the NRC has completed 

a rigorous Special Inspection and 

determined that enforcement is not 

required for this matter and that the 

NRC has reasonable assurance that 

adequate protection standards have 

been met and will continue to be met at 

DBNPS. NRC Region III Inspection 

Report 05000346/2010–008, dated 

October 22, 2010, focused on these 

concerns. The NRC Special Inspection 

Team was chartered to assess the 

circumstances surrounding the 

identification of the flaws in the reactor 

pressure vessel head control rod drive 

mechanism (CRDM) nozzle penetrations 

at DBNPS. The NRC has reviewed in 

detail the CDRM nozzle cracking, as 

well as the circumstances surrounding 

the causes of this cracking and previous 

opportunities for identification and 

intervention. The NRC’s inspection 

determined that the public health and 

safety have not been, nor are likely to 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
10410 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices 

1Request of the United States Postal Service to 

Add International Business Reply Service 

Competitive Contract 3 to the Competitive Products 

List and Notice of Filing of Contract (Under Seal), 

February 11, 2011 (Request). 

be, adversely affected. The inspection 

determined that the licensee conformed 

to the subject NRC regulatory 

requirements pertinent in this 

circumstance and applicable to 

assessing the cause and effect of the 

CRDM nozzle cracking conditions. 

A copy of the Director’s Decision will 

be filed with the Secretary of the 

Commission for the Commission’s 

review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206 

of the Commission’s regulations. As 

provided for by this regulation, the 

Director’s Decision will constitute the 

final action of the Commission 25 days 

after the date of the decision, unless the 

Commission, on its own motion, 

institutes a review of the Director’s 

Decision within that time. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day 

of February 2011. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Eric J. Leeds, 

Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4147 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2011–0006] 

Sunshine Federal Register Notice 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

DATES: Weeks of February 21, 28, March 

7, 14, 21, 28, 2011. 

PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference 

Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland. 

STATUS: Public and Closed. 

Week of February 21, 2011 

Thursday, February 24, 2011 

9 a.m. Briefing on Groundwater Task 

Force (Public Meeting) (Contact: 

Margie Kotzalas, 301–415–1727) 

This meeting will be webcast live at 

the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov, 

Week of February 28, 2011—Tentative 

Tuesday, March 1, 2011 

9 a.m. Briefing on Reactor Materials 

Aging Management Issues (Public 

Meeting) (Contact: Allen Hiser, 

301–415–5650) 

This meeting will be webcast live at 

the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov, 

Week of March 7, 2011—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of March 7, 2011. 

Week of March 14, 2011—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of March 14, 2011. 

Week of March 21, 2011—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of March 21, 2011. 

Week of March 28, 2011—Tentative 

Tuesday, March 29, 2011 

9 a.m. Briefing on Small Modular 

Reactors (Public Meeting) (Contact: 

Stephanie Coffin, 301–415–6877) 

This meeting will be webcast live at 

the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov, 

* * * * * 

*The schedule for Commission 

meetings is subject to change on short 

notice. To verify the status of meetings, 

call (recording)—(301) 415–1292. 

Contact person for more information: 

Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651. 

* * * * * 

The NRC Commission Meeting 

Schedule can be found on the Internet 

at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html, 

* * * * * 

The NRC provides reasonable 

accommodation to individuals with 

disabilities where appropriate. If you 

need a reasonable accommodation to 

participate in these public meetings, or 

need this meeting notice or the 

transcript or other information from the 

public meetings in another format (e.g. 

braille, large print), please notify Bill 

Dosch, Chief, Work Life and Benefits 

Branch, at 301–415–6200, TDD: 301– 

415–2100, or by e-mail at 

william.dosch@nrc.gov. Determinations 

on requests for reasonable 

accommodation will be made on a caseby-case basis. 

* * * * * 

This notice is distributed 

electronically to subscribers. If you no 

longer wish to receive it, or would like 

to be added to the distribution, please 

contact the Office of the Secretary, 

Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969), 

or send an e-mail to 

darlene.wright@nrc.gov. 

Dated: February 17, 2011. 

Rochelle C. Bavol, 

Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4150 Filed 2–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket No. MC2011–21 and CP2011–59; 

Order No. 674] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add International Business Reply 

Service (IBRS) Competitive Contract 3 to 

the competitive product list. The Postal 

Service also states that it has entered 

into an additional IBRS contract, which 

is the successor to an IBRS 2 contract. 

DATES: Comments are Due: February 22, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically by accessing the ‘‘Filing 

Online’’ link in the banner at the top of 

the Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing 

the Commission’s Filing Online system 

at https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filingonline/login.aspx. Commenters who 

cannot submit their views electronically 

should contact the person identified in 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section as the source for case-related 

information for advice on alternatives to 

electronic filing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

at 202–789–6820 (case-related 

information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov 

(electronic filing assistance). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On February 11, 2011, the Postal 

Service filed a request pursuant to 39 

U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq. 

to add International Business Reply 

Service (IBRS) Competitive Contract 3 to 

the competitive product list and 

announcing that it has entered into an 

additional IBRS contract, which is the 

successor to an IBRS 2 contract.1 The 

Postal Service asserts that the new IBRS 

Competitive Contract 3 product is a 

competitive product ‘‘not of general 

applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 

U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The 

Request has been assigned Docket No. 

MC2011–21. 

The Postal Service 

contemporaneously filed a redacted 

contract related to the proposed new 

product pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) 

and 39 CFR 3015.5. Id. Attachment 2. 

The contract is assigned Docket No. 

CP2011–59. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES