alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §579. Removal from a promotion list

(a) The name of a warrant officer recommended for promotion by a selection board convened under this chapter may be removed from the report of the selection board by the President.

(b) The Secretary concerned may remove the name of a warrant officer who is on a promotion list as a result of being recommended for promotion by a selection board convened under this chapter at any time before the promotion is effective.

(c) An officer whose name is removed from the list of officers recommended for promotion by a selection board continues to be eligible for consideration for promotion.

(d) If the next selection board that considers the warrant officer for promotion under this chapter selects the warrant officer for promotion and the warrant officer is promoted, the Secretary concerned may, upon his promotion, grant him the same effective date for pay and allowances and the same date of rank, and the same position on the warrant officer active-duty list as the warrant officer would have had if his name had not been so removed.

(e) If the next selection board does not select the warrant officer for promotion, or if his name is again removed under subsection (a) from the list of officers recommended for promotion by the selection board or under subsection (b) from the warrant officer promotion list, he shall be treated for all purposes as if he has twice failed of selection for promotion.

(Added Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title XI, §1112(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1497.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 562 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–190, §1112(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 1, 1992, see section 1132 of Pub. L. 102–190, set out as an Effective Date of 1991 Amendment note under section 521 of this title.
# C_2006177EN.01003301.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/33

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4328 — Advent/RWE/RWE Industrial Solutions)

(2006/C 177/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes; |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4328. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4328. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2006294EN.01006901.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/69

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 24 October 2006 — Martin Magone v Commission

(Case F-36/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 294/135)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.04.2005.

1

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DI AN C AI L I N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70117 A ge nc yN o. A 076- 641- 165 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D i an C ai L i n, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f C hi na, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n, H

e v . 

# FI LED JU L 14 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70117 2 G on zales , 501 F . 3d 1128, 1130- 31 ( 9th C i r . 2007) , a nd w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. T he agency deni ed L i n’ s m ot i on t o reopen as unt i m el y, and al so deni ed i tas am a tte ro f

d is c r e tio n b a s e dup o n L in ’s f a ilu r e to ap p e ara t h is a s y lu m m e r its h eari n g i n 2 0 0 0 an dh i s sub seq u en tfai l u re t o ap p ri se th e g o v ern m en to f h i s ad d ress u n til h e f ile dam o tio n to r e o p e n in 2 0 0 6 . I n h is o p e n in g b r ie f , L in f a ile dto c h a lle n g e th e a g e n c y ’s d is c r e tio n aryd e n ia l o f h is m o tio n to r e o p e n , w h ic h is d is p o s itiv e . Se e M

a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259 ( 9th C i r . 1996) ( s ta tin g th a t is s u e s n o t s up p o rte db ya r g u m e n t ar e d e e m e dab an d o n e d ) ; see a l so Se q u e i ra - So la n o v . I

NS , 10 4 F . 3d 27 8, 27 9 (9th C i r. 19 97 ) ( “ T he B IA consi dere d a ll o f th e r e le v an t c ir c u m s tan c e s in [ p e titio n e r ’s ] c a s e a n dd e c id e dth a t af a v o r ab le exer ci se of i t s di sc re t i on i n thi s c as e w as no tw arrant ed. ”) . L in ’s c o n te n tio n th a t h e is e n title dto f ile as u c c e s s iv e a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n is f or e c l os e d bythi s c ourt ’ s de c i s i on i n Chen v. Mukasey , 5 2 4 F .3 d1 0 2 8 , 1 0 3 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2008) ( an a l i e n m ayf i l e as uc c e s s i ve a s y l um appl i c a t i on onl yi n c onne c t i on w i th a succ es sf

ul m ot i on t o reopen, subj ec tt o the t i m e and nu m ber l i m i t at i on s) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
# C_2006240EN.01000501.xml

| 5.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/5

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

3 % on 1 October 2006

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

4 October 2006

(2006/C 240/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2684 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,80 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4566 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67430 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3225 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5888 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,38 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3995 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5767 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,287 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,88 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9406 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5368 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,60 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,246 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9219 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7049 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4299 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8836 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9228 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0113 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 203,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0768 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0256 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3775 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 694,65 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6836 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,420 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9980 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,692 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2684

JPY

Japanese yen

149,80

DKK

Danish krone

7,4566

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67430

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3225

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5888

ISK

Iceland króna

87,38

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3995

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5767

CZK

Czech koruna

28,287

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,88

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9406

RON

Romanian leu

3,5368

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,60

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,246

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9219

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7049

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4299

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8836

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9228

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0113

KRW

South Korean won

1 203,97

ZAR

South African rand

10,0768

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0256

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3775

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 694,65

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6836

PHP

Philippine peso

63,420

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9980

THB

Thai baht

47,692

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 293.10 How long will the Secretary take to review a compact or amendment? ( a ) The Secretary must approve or disapprove a compact or amendment within 45 calendar days after receiving the compact or amendment.
( b ) The Secretary will notify the Tribe and the State in writing of the decision to approve or disapprove a compact or amendment.
MEMORANDUM

To: File From: Michael Galbraith Subject: Meeting with Rubber Manufacturers Association Date: July 9, 2009

______________________________________________________________________________ On July 9, 2009, EPA (Matt Hale, Michael Galbrait h, Lyn Luben) met with representatives from the Rubber Manufacturers Associat ion (RMA). RMA was represen ted by Michael Blumenthal and Tracy Norberg. RMA generally discussed EPA’s Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Titled “Identification of Non-Hazardous Material s That Are Solid Waste” that was published in the Federal Register on January 2, 2009.

RMA generally explained and described the scrap tire recycling markets, with an emphasis on used tires used as fuels, and generally explai ned possible impacts that an EPA designation that scrap tires are solid waste when used as fuel would have on tire recycli ng markets and State tire collection programs.

RMA provided EPA with a list of cement kilns that use tires as a supplemental fuel (see attached).

Attachment
EX-34.4
(logo) plante
       moran


Plante & Moran, PLLC
Suite 2700
225 W. Washington St.
Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.899.4460
Fax: 312.726.3262
plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that National Tax Search, LLC
(the "Company") complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the
National Tax Search TaxQ system (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012. The Company has determined that only certain servicing
criteria, 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),
1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are
applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform
covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable
to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this
report.

Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a
selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the
Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company
processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance
activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not
include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that
may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2012 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.


/s/Plante & Moran, PLLC


Chicago, IL
February 8, 2013


Praxity
MEMBER
GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF
INDEPENDENT FIRMS
# C_2006237EN.01000701.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/7

---

Action brought on 20 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-322/06)

(2006/C 237/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell and W. Wils, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to give effect to Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities, (1)or in any event by failing to inform the Commission of those laws, regulations and administrative provisions, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to give effect to Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities, (1)or in any event by failing to inform the Commission of those laws, regulations and administrative provisions, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | Order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be implemented in national law expired on 23 March 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 80, p. 35.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.109 How should a State court determine an Indian child's Tribe when the child may be a member or eligible for membership in more than one Tribe? ( a ) If the Indian child is a member or eligible for membership in only one Tribe, that Tribe must be designated as the Indian child's Tribe.
( b ) If the Indian child meets the definition of “Indian child” through more than one Tribe, deference should be given to the Tribe in which the Indian child is already a member, unless otherwise agreed to by the Tribes.
( c ) If an Indian child meets the definition of “Indian child” through more than one Tribe because the child is a member in more than one Tribe or the child is not a member of but is eligible for membership in more than one Tribe, the court must provide the opportunity in any involuntary child-custody proceeding for the Tribes to determine which should be designated as the Indian child's Tribe. ( 1 ) If the Tribes are able to reach an agreement, the agreed-upon Tribe should be designated as the Indian child's Tribe.
( 2 ) If the Tribes are unable to reach an agreement, the State court designates, for the purposes of ICWA, the Indian Tribe with which the Indian child has the more significant contacts as the Indian child's Tribe, taking into consideration: ( i ) Preference of the parents for membership of the child;
( ii ) Length of past domicile or residence on or near the reservation of each Tribe;
( iii ) Tribal membership of the child's custodial parent or Indian custodian; and
( iv ) Interest asserted by each Tribe in the child-custody proceeding;
( v ) Whether there has been a previous adjudication with respect to the child by a court of one of the Tribes; and
( vi ) Self-identification by the child, if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to meaningfully self-identify.
( 3 ) A determination of the Indian child's Tribe for purposes of ICWA and the regulations in this subpart do not constitute a determination for any other purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated Balance Sheet of IENTERTAINMENT NETWORK, Inc. as of September 30,
2000 and the related Statement of Operations for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,180
<PP&E>                                           2,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,173
<COMMON>                                         1,579
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,791)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,183
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,563
<CGS>                                               91
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (61)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (3)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,010)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,026)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
#### § 2.702 How will I know what decisions are appealable under this subpart?

When an LBO issues a Tribal representative recognition decision, the official will include the following notice of appeal rights at the end of the decision document:

YOU HAVE 10 DAYS TO APPEAL THIS DECISION.

This decision may be appealed to the —[appropriate reviewing official. If the LBO is a Regional Director, the reviewing official is the Director of the BIA]—at—[address, including email address if filing by email is permitted].

*Deadline for Appeal.* Your notice of appeal must be submitted as provided for in 25 CFR 2.214 within 10 (ten) days of the date you receive notice of this decision. Your notice of appeal must explain how you satisfy the standing requirements in 25 CFR 2.200. If you do not file a timely appeal, you will have failed to exhaust administrative remedies required by these regulations. If no appeal is timely filed, this decision will become effective at the expiration of the appeal period. No extension of time may be granted for filing a notice of appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-17-1999
<CASH>                                          26,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,221
<INVENTORY>                                    772,137
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               953,287
<PP&E>                                         536,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                 127,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,380,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          573,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                     202,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,380,678
<SALES>                                        541,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               541,760
<CGS>                                          341,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  341,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,999)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,569
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,569
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>