alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 214.13 Diligence; annual expenditures; mining records. ( a ) Lessees shall exercise diligence in the conduct of prospecting and mining operations, and on all leases referred to in § 214.8(a) shall expend annually in development work a sum which with the annual rental shall make an amount of not less than $5 per acre. On all leases referred to in § 214.8 (b) and (c) there shall be expended annually in development work a sum which inclusive of the annual rental shall make an amount of not less than $1 for each acre or fraction thereof included in the lease. The lands covered by each lease referred to in § 214.8 (d) shall be prospected for lead and zinc ores by drilling within 1 year test holes aggregating 2,000 feet unless a sufficient ore body is discovered to justify the sinking of a shaft to the ore body and the erecting of a mill when such tract may be released from further prospecting by the written consent of the superintendent: *Provided,* That within 90 days after an ore body of sufficient quantity is discovered, and shown by the logs or records of the drill holes, to justify the expenditure, the sinking of a shaft to the ore body, and the erection of a mill shall be commenced and continued to completion without cessation of work thereon, barring unavoidable accidents or causes beyond the control of the lessee.
( b ) Lessee shall keep upon the leased premises accurate records of the drilling, redrilling, or deepening of all holes showing the formations, and upon the completion of such holes, copies of such records shall be transmitted to the superintendent by the lessee after the first completion and of any further drilling thereafter, and a failure to so furnish report within the time prescribed shall be considered a violation of the regulations. Lessee shall, before commencing operations, file with the superintendent a plat and preliminary statement of how the openings are to be made and the property developed.
# C_2006249EN.01001901.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/19

---

(2006/C 249/40)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 237, 30.9.2006

OJ C 237, 30.9.2006

Past publications

OJ C 224, 16.9.2006

OJ C 212, 2.9.2006

OJ C 190, 12.8.2006

OJ C 178, 29.7.2006

OJ C 165, 15.7.2006

OJ C 154, 1.7.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


     I, Elie Housman, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of InkSure Technologies Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  November 9, 2005


/s/ Elie Housman
----------------
Elie Housman, Chief Executive Officer
Opinion filed November 6, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-14-00210-CR

___________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

HUMBERTO LINARES PALMA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 441st District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR 38386

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The State of Texas has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The State filed 

a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress filed 

by the defendant, Humberto Linares Palma. Palma died prior to the disposition of 

this appeal. Attached to the State’s motion to dismiss is a copy of Palma’s death 

certificate. The State correctly points out that all of the issues in this appeal have 

become moot due to Palma’s death. Therefore, because the State is the appealing 

party, we must dismiss the appeal. State v. McCaffrey, 76 S.W.3d 392, 392–93 
2

(Tex. Crim. App. 2002); cf. TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(2) (if the “appellant” in a 

criminal case dies during the appeal, the proper disposition of the appeal is 

permanent abatement). 

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

November 6, 2014

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
### [§2415. Renumbered §4956]
### §868. Art. 68. Branch offices

The Secretary concerned may direct the Judge Advocate General to establish a branch office with any command. The branch office shall be under an Assistant Judge Advocate General who, with the consent of the Judge Advocate General, may establish a Court of Criminal Appeals with one or more panels. That Assistant Judge Advocate General and any Court of Criminal Appeals established by him may perform for that command under the general supervision of the Judge Advocate General, the respective duties which the Judge Advocate General and a Court of Criminal Appeals established by the Judge Advocate General would otherwise be required to perform as to all cases involving sentences not requiring approval by the President.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 61; Pub. L. 90–632, §2(29), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1342; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, §924(c)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2831.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 868 | 50:655. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 68), 64 Stat. 130. |

The word "considers" is substituted for the word "deems". The word "may" is substituted for the words "shall be empowered to". The word "respective" is inserted for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 substituted "Court of Criminal Appeals" for "Court of Military Review" wherever appearing.

1968—Pub. L. 90–632 substituted the Secretary concerned for the President as the individual authorized to direct the Judge Advocate General to establish a branch office under an Assistant Judge Advocate General with any command and substituted "Court of Military Review" for "board of review" as the name of the body established by the Assistant Judge Advocate General in charge of the branch office.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
#### § 301.7 Stonecutting.

All stone used, including turquoise, is to be hand-cut and polished. This permits the use of hand- or foot-driven wheels.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3015729-OCT-201008:25 AM
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Kunal K. Singh,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the J.P. MorganChase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-C6 (the "Exchange Actperiodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division ofPNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC, asServicing Function Participant, and Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, LP, as PrimaryServicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 16, 2020

 

 

/s/ Kunal K. Singh

 

 

President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00009-CV

Ali Mohandesi and Erika Dahl-Stamnes, Appellants

v.

Ryan McCarley, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-18-006514, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants Ali Mohandesi and Erika Dahl-Stamnes have filed an unopposed

motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant appellants’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: August 17, 2021
### §9320. More than thirty years: permanent professors and the Director of Admissions of the United States Air Force Academy

(a) The Secretary of the Air Force may retire an officer specified in subsection (b) who has more than 30 years of service as a commissioned officer.

(b) Subsection (a) applies in the case of the following officers:

(1) Any permanent professor of the United States Air Force Academy.

(2) The Director of Admissions of the United States Air Force Academy.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 551, §8920; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §509(b)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 298; renumbered §9320, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(13), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8920 | 10:1079a(c) (proviso). | Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 512, §520(c) (proviso), 61 Stat. 912. |

The word "retire" is substituted for the words "direct the retirement of". The words "as a commissioned officer" are substituted for the word "commissioned".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9320 was renumbered section 9420 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8920 of this title as this section.

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 substituted "permanent professors and the Director of Admissions" for "professors" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Secretary of the Air Force may retire any permanent professor of the United States Air Force Academy who has more than 30 years of service as a commissioned officer."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 10910)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         March 30, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call.)                    

*Contact Person:*                         John K. Hayes, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 959, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-451-3398.                         *hayesj@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: February 22, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4363 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 175.210 What is BIA's procedure for adjusting service fees? If, based on our annual review, we determine our service fees need to be adjusted: ( a ) We will notify you at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the adjustment; and
( b ) We will publish a schedule of the adjusted service fees in a local newspaper(s) and post them in the local utility office serving you.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 222

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives about the Federal

Bureau of Investigation Crisis Negotiation Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 25, 1999

Mr. HYDE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives about

the Federal Bureau of Investigation Crisis Negotiation

Program.

Whereas the Crisis Negotiation Unit of the Federal Bureau

of Investigation has for the last twenty-five years worked

to negotiate the release of hostages;

Whereas the FBI agents who serve in the FBI’s Crisis Negotiation Unit deserve the gratitude of our nation for their

bravery, devotion and their ability to negotiate in the

most dire situations the saving of lives of countless hostages and law enforcement personnel;

Whereas the Crisis Negotiation Unit has also protected numerous potential innocent bystanders from harm in many

high profile hostage crisis situations like the Lufthansa

Skyjacking at John F. Kennedy Airport in 1993, to
2

HRES 222 IH

many serious incidents that have received little or no

publicity; and

Whereas the Crisis Negotiation Unit, a key element of the

FBI’s Critical Incident Response Group, in performing

its mission of operation, training, research and program

management has—

(1) maintained a 24-hour-a-day operational response;

(2) trained FBI negotiators and international law

enforcement personnel through exchange programs; and

(3) conducted research designed to expand the FBI’s

capability to assess, manage and successfully resolve

many life-threatening crises: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Crisis Nego3 tiation Unit and, on behalf of all Americans, congratulates

4 the Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents who have,

5 through their dedicated service to our nation, guarded the

6 public safety in even the most challenging law enforcement

7 situations.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. app. I section 10(d), of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and 5 U.S.C. section 552b, the Government in the Sunshine Act, a report summarizing the closed meeting activities of the Art Advisory Panel during 2010 has been prepared. A copy of this report has been filed with the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Management.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This notice is effective                         *March 1, 2011.*

# ADDRESSES:

                        The report is available for public inspection and requests for copies should be addressed to: Internal Revenue Service, Freedom of Information Reading Room, Room 1621, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, telephone number (202) 622-5164 (not a toll free number). The report is also available at                         *http://www.irs.gov*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Bothwell, AP:TPV:ART, Internal Revenue Service/Appeals, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005, telephone (202) 435-5611 (not a toll free telephone number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

It has determined that this document is not a major rule as defined in Executive Order 12291 and that a regulatory impact analysis therefore, is not required. Neither does this document constitute a rule subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6).

Douglas Shulman,

Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

[FR Doc. 2011-4198 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### §8384. Promotion of retired members to higher enlisted grades: retention of grade upon release from active duty

When on active duty, retired enlisted members of the Navy or the Marine Corps are eligible for promotion to higher enlisted grades or ratings. When released from active duty, they shall, unless entitled to a higher grade under another provision of law, retain the grades or ratings they hold at the time of their release.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 417, §6484, renumbered §8384, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(17), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6484 | 34 U.S.C. 434. | July 1, 1918, ch. 114, 40 Stat. 719 (1st 9 lines of 2d par.). |

The words "who has been ordered into active service since April 6, 1917" are omitted as executed. The words "to higher enlisted grades or ratings" are inserted for clarity. The eligibility of retired enlisted men for appointments to warrant and commissioned grades is covered by chapter 539 of this title where the requirements for these appointments are set forth. The words "unless entitled to a higher grade under another provision of law" are inserted to make it clear that retired enlisted members are not precluded by this section from obtaining the benefits of other provisions of law that may give a higher grade to them on their release from active duty.

The provision relating to pay, allowances, and benefits is omitted because it was superseded by §§514 and 516 of the Career Compensation Act of 1949 (37 U.S.C. 314 and 316).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6484 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.