alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 55

Providing a sense of the House of Representatives that at least one-third

of the budget surplus over the next 10 years should be dedicated to

paying down the national debt of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. UPTON (for himself and Mr. LAHOOD) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

RESOLUTION

Providing a sense of the House of Representatives that at

least one-third of the budget surplus over the next 10

years should be dedicated to paying down the national

debt of the United States.

Whereas the current national debt of the United States is

$5.6 trillion;

Whereas in 1997 the Government spent over 15 percent of

its budget to pay interest on the national debt;

Whereas net interest payments amounted to $243 billion last

year;

Whereas interest payments on the national debt for the next

five years are projected to be $977 billion;
2

•HRES 55 IH

Whereas debt held by the public in 1998 was 44 percent of

Gross Domestic Product;

Whereas a smaller debt would make more credit available for

private sector investment and other productive investments that would help future economic growth; and

Whereas a smaller debt would also result in lower interest

rates and would increase the level of national savings:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) in addition to other policy decisions by the

3 Congress, lowering the national debt must be a cen4 tral element in the debate over the use of projected

5 budget surpluses; and

6 (2) at least one-third of the projected budget

7 surpluses over the next 10 years should be dedicated

8 to paying down the national debt of the United

9 States.

Æ
IV

House Calendar No. 235

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 519

[Report No. 106–658]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal Revenue

Code of 1986 to phaseout the estate and gift taxes over a 10-year period.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to phaseout the estate and gift taxes over a 10-year period.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 8) to amend

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to phaseout the estate

5 and gift taxes over a 10-year period. The bill shall be con6 sidered as read for amendment. The amendment rec7 ommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now
2

HRES 519 RH

1 printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The pre2 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,

3 as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to

4 final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one

5 hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided

6 and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

7 member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the

8 further amendment printed in the report of the Committee

9 on Rules accompanying this resolution, which may be of10 fered only by a Member designated in the report, shall

11 be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable

12 for one hour equally divided and controlled by the pro13 ponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit

14 with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 235

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 519

[Report No. 106–658]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 tophaseout the estate and gift taxes over a 10-yearperiod.

JUNE 7, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### §8455. Midshipmen: allotment upon redistricting of Congressional Districts

If as a result of redistricting a State the domicile of a midshipman, or a nominee, nominated by a Representative falls within a congressional district other than that from which he was nominated, he is charged to the district in which his domicile so falls. For this purpose, the number of midshipmen otherwise authorized for that district is increased to include him. However, the number as so increased is reduced by one if he fails to become a midshipman or when he is finally separated from the Naval Academy.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 430, §6955; renumbered §8455, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6955 | 34 U.S.C. 1032–1. | July 7, 1943, ch. 193, 57 Stat. 383. |

The word "domicile" is substituted for the words "place of residence" to conform to the long-standing interpretation of this section (see also opinions of the Judge Advocate General of the Army R. 29, 83; J.A.G. 351.11, Feb. 10, 1925). The words "a congressional district other than that from which he was nominated" are substituted for the word "another". The words "were appointed with respect to", "of the former district", "as additional numbers", "at such academy for the Representative", "temporarily", and "in attendance at either academy under an appointment from such former district" are omitted as surplusage. The words "the district in which his domicile so falls" are substituted for the words "of the latter district". The words "to include him" are substituted for 34 U.S.C. 1032–1 (18 words before proviso). The words "However, the number as so increased" are substituted for 34 U.S.C. 1032–1 (1st 13 words of proviso). The words "if he fails to become a midshipman" are inserted for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6955 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, David Guthrie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc.
for the period ending June 30, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 21, 2005

/s/David Guthrie
David Guthrie, President (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the “**Company**”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”),I, Jonathan K. Hsu, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| May 10, 2005 |                                                |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|              |                                                |
|              | /s/ Jonathan K. Hsu                                 |   |
|              | Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer |
|              | (Principal Financial and AccountingOfficer)         |

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.*

 

----
### §9275. Medal of honor; Air Force cross; distinguished-service medal: delegation of power to award

The President may delegate his authority to award the medal of honor, Air Force cross, and distinguished-service medal, to a commanding general of a separate air force or higher unit in the field, or to an equivalent commander of a separate space force or higher unit in the field.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 541, §8745; Pub. L. 86–593, §1(3), July 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 332; renumbered §9275, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(11), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(12)(B), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3811.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8745 | 10:1410. | July 9, 1918, ch. 143 (16th par., less words after semicolon, under "Ordnance Department"), 40 Stat. 872. |

The words "under such conditions, regulations, and limitations as he shall prescribe" are omitted as surplusage. The words "his authority" are substituted for the words "the power conferred upon him by sections 1403, 1406–1408, 1409–1412, 1416, 1420, 1422, 1423, and 1424 of this title".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted before period at end ", or to an equivalent commander of a separate space force or higher unit in the field".

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8745 of this title as this section.

1960—Pub. L. 86–593 substituted "Air Force cross" for "distinguished-service cross" in section catchline and in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §9778. Licenses: military reservations; erection and use of buildings; Young Men's Christian Association

Under such conditions as he may prescribe, the Secretary of the Air Force may issue a revocable license to the International Committee of Young Men's Christian Associations of North America to erect and maintain, on military reservations within the United States and the Commonwealths and possessions, buildings needed by that organization for the promotion of the social, physical, intellectual, and moral welfare of the members of the Air Force on those reservations.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 591; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(a)(6), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3441.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9778 | 10:1346. | May 31, 1902, ch. 943, 32 Stat. 282. |

The words "may issue" are substituted for the words "Authority is given to * * * in his discretion, to grant permission". The words "Under such conditions as he may prescribe" are substituted for the words "under such regulations as the Secretary of the Army may impose". The words "members of the Air Force" are substituted for the word "garrisons". The words "the Territories, Commonwealths, and possessions" are substituted for the words "or its island possessions", for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "Commonwealths and possessions" for "Territories, Commonwealths, and possessions".
#### William Hall et al., Respondents, *v.*Bridget Sheehan, Appellant.

Where materials are furnished for and are used indiscriminately in the erection of several contiguous buildings, they may, for the purpqses of a mechanics’ lien, be regarded as one building, and but one notice of lien need be filed covering all.

Under the lien law of 1862 (chap. 478, Laws of 1862), service of notice of the lien upon the owner of the land is not necessary to validate the lien; the lien is created by “ filing the notice ” (§ 1), and all that is required by way of notice to enforce the lien is that notice shall be annexed to the complaint (§ 2). The only object of service of notice upon the owner provided for by section 3 of said act, is to prevent payments by him to the contractor, etc., after service of notice.

Plaintiff filed a lien for materials furnished for thirty bouses; he released fifteen houses upon being paid the full value of the materials which went into those houses. *Held,*that his lien upon the remaining fifteen houses for the balance of his account was not affected by the release.

(Argued April 6, 1877;

decided April 17, 1877.)

This was an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The facts and the questions presented appear sufficiently in the head note.

*619The court cite *McAuley*v. *Meldrian*(1 Daly, 400); *Moran*v. *Chase*(52 N. Y., 346.)

*E. F.*Bullard, for appellant.

*W. E. Osbom,*for respondents.

Earl, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur, Miller, J., absent.

J udgment affirmed.
# C_2006237EN.01000601.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Employment Tribunal (London South) made on 10 July 2006 — S. Coleman v Attridge Law, Steve Law

(Case C-303/06)

(2006/C 237/10)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Employment Tribunal (London South)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: S. Coleman

Applicant:

Defendants: Attridge Law, Steve Law

Defendants:

Questions referred

| 1. | In the context of the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability, does the Directive (1) only protect from direct discrimination and harassment persons who are themselves disabled? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the context of the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability, does the Directive (1) only protect from direct discrimination and harassment persons who are themselves disabled?

1

| 2. | If the answer to Question (1) above is in the negative, does the Directive protect employees who, though they are not themselves disabled, are treated less favourably or harassed on the ground of their association with a person who is disabled? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question (1) above is in the negative, does the Directive protect employees who, though they are not themselves disabled, are treated less favourably or harassed on the ground of their association with a person who is disabled?

| 3. | Where an employer treats an employee less favourably than he treats or would treat other employees, and it is established that the ground for the treatment of the employee is that the employee has a disabled son for whom the employee cares, is that treatment direct discrimination in breach of the principle of equal treatment established by the Directive? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Where an employer treats an employee less favourably than he treats or would treat other employees, and it is established that the ground for the treatment of the employee is that the employee has a disabled son for whom the employee cares, is that treatment direct discrimination in breach of the principle of equal treatment established by the Directive?

| 4. | Where an employer harasses an employee, and it is established that the ground for the treatment of the employee is that the employee has a disabled son for whom the employee cares, is that harassment a breach of the principle of equal treatment established by the Directive? |
| --- | --- |

4.

Where an employer harasses an employee, and it is established that the ground for the treatment of the employee is that the employee has a disabled son for whom the employee cares, is that harassment a breach of the principle of equal treatment established by the Directive?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, OJ L 303, p. 16

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.101 What is the purpose of this subpart?

The regulations in this subpart clarify the minimum Federal standards governing implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) to ensure that ICWA is applied in all States consistent with the Act's express language, Congress's intent in enacting the statute, and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families.
EX-10.24





 Exhibit 10.24 

 
 



 
 August 21, 2020 
 JASON
BLAISURE 
 CONFIDENTIAL 
 Dear Jason, 

In assuming your new position as Chief Supply Chain Officer, I am very pleased to provide this formal confirmation of the adjustment to your annual base
salary to $450,000 effective August 9, 2020. 
 Effective with the 2020 fiscal year, your bonus potential will remain same at 50% of your salary, pro-rated based on the effective date of your revised salary, and payable in accordance with Chobani’s standard payroll practice, less applicable taxes, deductions and withholdings. 

I look forward to being in-touch in September regarding your additional participation in the Chobani Rewards and
Long-Term Incentive programs, following approval by Hamdi and the Chobani Board. 
 Jason, thank you for your outstanding and tireless commitments to the
Chobani business, our people, culture, team and values. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Grace C. Zuncic
	
	Chief People and Culture
	Officer Chobani LLC
EXHIBIT 32(a)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Overnite Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leo H. Suggs, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ LEO H. SUGGS                     
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and President



August 10, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Glosario de Términos – Inglés-Español 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Glosario de Términos – Inglés-Español

ABCDEFGHIJ K LMNOPQRSTUV X Y Z

Nombres de Formularios de PBGC   |  Nombres de publicaciones de PBGC

**A**

**B**

 

 

 

**C**

**D**

**E**

**F**

**G**

**H**

I

**J**

L

**M**

**N**

**O**

**P**

**Q**

**R**

**S**

**T**

**U**

**V**

**Y**

Nombres de Formularios de PBGC

Nombres de Publicaciones Adjuntas 

May 21, 2021
### §1161. Inapplicability of other sections

Sections 341, 343, 1102(a)(1), 1104, 1105, 1107, 1129(a)(7), and 1129(c) of this title do not apply in a case concerning a railroad.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2641.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

This section makes inapplicable sections of the bill which are either inappropriate in railroad reorganizations, or relate to matters which are otherwise dealt with in subchapter IV.