alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 36.13 Standard IV—Curriculum development. ( a ) Each school shall implement an organized program of curriculum development involving certified and non-certified staff and shall provide the opportunity for involvement by members of the local community.
( b ) Curriculum development program activities shall be based on an analysis of school programs and shall be related to needs assessment and evaluation.
( c ) Each school shall involve staff and provide the opportunity for involvement by the tribal community in planning programs, objectives, and activities which meet student/teacher needs.
IV

House Calendar No. 262

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 559

[Report No. 106–766]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section

103(a)(1) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year

2001.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 2000

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 103(a)(1) of the concurrent

resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2001.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation

4 pursuant to section 103(a)(1) of the concurrent resolution

5 on the budget for fiscal year 2001. All points of order
2

HRES 559 RH

1 against the conference report and against its consideration

2 are waived. The conference report shall be considered as

3 read.

4 SEC. 2. House Resolution 556 is laid on the table.

House Calendar No. 262

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 559

[Report No. 106–766]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section

103(a)(1) of the concurrent resolution on thebudget for fiscal year 2001.

JULY 19, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Document

Exhibit 10.27
Summary of Director, Committee and Chairperson Compensation




On October 27, 2021, the Board of Directors of the Company approved cash director fees, committee member fees and chairperson fees to be paid to non-management directors of the Company in fiscal 2022, for the meetings beginning in January 2022. Director fees, committee fees and chairperson fees are only paid to non-management directors as summarized below: 


Each non-management director will receive a director fee of $17,500 per Board meeting attended in person or by teleconference, paid quarterly and not to exceed $70,000 per year. 


Each non-management director who serves on a committee of the Board of Directors will receive a fee of $1,250 per committee meeting attended in person or by teleconference, paid quarterly and not to exceed $5,000 per year. 


Each non-management director who serves as the chairperson of a committee of the Board of Directors shall receive a fee of $625 per committee meeting attended in person or by teleconference, paid quarterly and not to exceed $2,500 per year.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 188 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 25, 1999.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Small Business: Ms. Berkley of Nevada and Mr. Udall of 
Colorado.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### §8878. Interfering with delivery, custody, or sale of prize property

Whoever willfully does, or aids or advises in the doing of, any act relating to the bringing in, custody, preservation, sale, or other disposition of any property captured as prize, or relating to any documents or papers connected with the property or to any deposition or other document or paper connected with the proceedings, with intent to defraud, delay, or injure the United States or any claimant of that property, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 482, §7678; renumbered §8878, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7678 | 34 U.S.C. 1167. | Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §38, 35 Stat. 1096. |

The words "captor or" between "any" and "claimant" are omitted because the Act of March 3, 1899, ch. 413, §13, 30 Stat. 1007, repealed all laws authorizing the distribution of prize proceeds to captors. These words were apparently carried over inadvertently to §38 of the 1909 Act from the source of that section, namely R.S. 5441.

The section is worded in the style of Title 18, U.S. Code.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7678 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §950q. Principals

Any person punishable under this chapter who—

(1) commits an offense punishable by this chapter, or aids, abets, counsels, commands, or procures its commission;

(2) causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him would be punishable by this chapter; or

(3) is a superior commander who, with regard to acts punishable by this chapter, knew, had reason to know, or should have known, that a subordinate was about to commit such acts or had done so and who failed to take the necessary and reasonable measures to prevent such acts or to punish the perpetrators thereof,

is a principal.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2606.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 950q, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2624, related to principals, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
#### § 20.508 What must the social services agency do when a child is placed in foster care, residential care or guardianship home?

The social services agency must make efforts to secure child support for the child in foster care or residential care through a court of competent jurisdiction.
### [§2380. Renumbered §3456]
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Nimitz Carrier Strike Group Returns to San Diego from DeploymentJune 29, 2023 — Ships from the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (Nimitz CSG) returned to San Diego June 28, concluding a seven-month deployment to U.S. 3rd and 7th Fleet areas of operations (AO)... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# C_2006212EN.01000801.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — J.J. Kersbergen-Lap, D. Dams-Schipper v Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen

(Case C-154/05) (1)

1

(Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 4(2a), Article 10a and Annex IIa - Special non-contributory benefits - Netherlands benefit for disabled young people - Non-exportability)

(2006/C 212/13)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: J.J.Kersbergen-Lap, D. Dams-Schipper

Applicants:

Defendant: Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank Amsterdam — Interpretation of Articles 4(2a) and10a of and Annex IIa to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416), as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92 of 30 April 1992 (OJ 1992 L 136, p.1) — Special non-contributory benefits — System of coordination laid down under Article 10a of Regulation No 1408/71 — Field of application — Whether or not a benefit for young disabled people mentioned in Annex IIa to Regulation No 1408/71 is included — Recipients resident outside the Netherlands

Operative part of the judgment

A benefit under the Wet arbeidsongeschiktheidsvoorziening jonggehandicapten of 24 April 1997 (law on provision of incapacity benefit to disabled young people) must be regarded as a special non-contributory benefit, as referred to in Article 4(2a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 307/1999 of 8 February 1999, with the result that only the coordinating provision in Article 10a of that regulation must be applied and that benefit cannot be paid to any person residing outside the Netherlands.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.06.2005.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 519 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 235
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 519

                          [Report No. 106-658]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal 
 Revenue Code of 1986 to phaseout the estate and gift taxes over a 10-
                              year period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2000

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal 
 Revenue Code of 1986 to phaseout the estate and gift taxes over a 10-
                              year period.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
phaseout the estate and gift taxes over a 10-year period. The bill 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by 
the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be 
considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto 
to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
Means; (2) the further amendment printed in the report of the Committee 
on Rules accompanying this resolution, which may be offered only by a 
Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, and shall 
be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.

                                                 House Calendar No. 235

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 519

                          [Report No. 106-658]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal 
 Revenue Code of 1986 to phaseout the estate and gift taxes over a 10-
                              year period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Brian Catlett, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of TCP International Holdings Ltd.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:


a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





By:/s/ Brian CatlettBrian CatlettChief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Date: April 30, 2015
### Type sections of the Madison Group (Mississippian) and its subdivisions in Montana

By: William Jasper SandoJ. Thomas Dutro Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp842

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 393

Returning to the Senate the bill S. 4.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 18, 1999

Mr. WELLER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Returning to the Senate the bill S. 4.

1 Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 4) entitled

2 the ‘‘Soldiers’, Sailors’, Airmen’s, and Marines’ Bill of

3 Rights Act of 1999’’, in the opinion of this House, con4 travenes the first clause of the seventh section of the first

5 article of the Constitution of the United States and is an

6 infringement of the privileges of this House and that such

7 bill be respectfully returned to the Senate with a message

8 communicating this resolution.

Æ
J

~~ t eo sra r

~

s

~ ^ 'Z UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

x ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

4 ~1 c~~ q Z PROt E 

### JAN 17 2001

Or-r-iCE orAIR AND RADIATION

David Moody, Ph.D., Manager Carlsbad Pield Ofrce Department of Enerby P.O. 13ox 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221
Dcar Dr. Moocly:
This is in response to your January 16, 2007, request for the 13nvironniental Proteetion Agency's (EPA's) eoncnrrence on the Department of Energy's (DOE) ch•aft recerti'fication letter that expands the certification of the Central Characterization Project's (CCP) transuranie (TRU)waste cliaracterization program at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to iticlude remoteliandled (RI I) debris waste. Your request is in aecordance w' rth the Carlsbacl T'ield Oflice (CBPO) proeedures that are intended to ensw•e that DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (Wll'P) site certirications corrclate appropriately with EPA approvals for waste characterization activities at DOE TRU waste generator sites.
DOE's drafit recertification is based on thc CBPO aaclit, conducted in June 2006 (CBPO Anclit A-06-21), wliicli covered characterization activities 1'or RII retrievably-storccl cicbris waste (S5000). EPA independently eonducted an RI-I baseline inspection concurrent with CBPO's audit o1' INL CCP's RI-1 TRU waste characterization program (BPA-1NI. CCP-RL-I-O6.06-08) for compHance with EPA regulations.
On January 12, 2007, EPA issuecl a final inspection repor•t (available as A-98-49; II-A4- 72 in thc EPA Air pocket) ancl an approval letter for RN at INL-CCP. On January 17, 2007, EPA approved W1PP Wastc 1nPormation System (WWIS) 9or RH, as a Tier 1(Tl) change (See A-98-49: 11-A4-74 in the EPA Air pocicet).
El'A concin•s that the waste characterization equip(nent, procedures and waste streams encompassed in DOE's ch•aft recertilieation letter corrnport with all of EPA's existing approvals for contaet-hanclled and remote-handled waste at INI- CCP.

IntornotAddracs(eRL) r hllp://www.opn.pov Rocyclatl/Racyclabin s Printod wllh Vopotnblo OII Nnsod Inl<s on l00%Postconsumor, Procoss Chiorino Prao Rocycloci PnporThank you for providing us with an opportunity to rcview the revised draft certification

letter for INL CCP. If yon have any questions or concerns, please corrtact Rajani doglekar at (202)343-9462 or Bd Feltcorn at (202)343-9422.



### Since ely,



# ~~~~,~ ~
Jnan

~ Re es Director 

# ~ Y Radiation Protection Division

cc: Electronic Distribution Lloyd Piper, C13P0 Vernon Daub, CT3F0 Courtland Fesmire, CI3F0 Ava IIonand, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CT3F0 MarHn Navarrete, C13F0 Dennis Miehls, CI3F0 Tlizabetli Sellcrs, INL Jerry Wells, INL Allison Pringlc, C7'AC Wayne Ledford, CTAC Steve Zappe, NMPD Nick Ceto, BPA Region X
# C_2006242EN.01001101.xml

| 7.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4238 — E.ON/Prazská Plynárenská)

(2006/C 242/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 11 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4238. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4238. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 173.7 Permits, transferable.

Permits may be transferred only with the approval of the Secretary.