alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ITXC Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Tom Evslin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated
result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2003



/s/    Tom EvslinTom EvslinChief Executive Officer of ITXC Corp.




This certification has been
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



28
EXHIBIT 34.3



| |  |  |  |                                            
| |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | Grant Thornton LLP                         
| |  |  |  | 201 S College Street, Suite 2500 Charlotte,
| |  |  |  | NC 28244-0100                              
| |  |  |  | T 704.632.3500                             
| |  |  |  | F 704.334.7701 www.GrantThornton.com       

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors

TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Managements Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria (Managements Report), that TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, except for those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust or
operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the Platform). Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included
testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material
noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Companys servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc complied with the applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2011 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Charlotte, North Carolina

March 1, 2012
# C_2006155EN.01001102.xml

| 4.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4250 — Industri Kapital/Minimax)

(2006/C 155/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4250. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4250. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
### [§2398a. Renumbered §2922d]
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

74-5 

November 8, 1974 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4006(a)(3) Premium Rates. Initial Rates

4021(b)(1). Plans covered. Individual Account Plans 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your recent letter inquiring as to whether your "Profit-Sharing Retirement Plan for Employees"

is excluded from coverage of the termination insurance program and, specifically, the obligation to pay premiums under

Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. 

Section 4021 (b)(1) excludes from the coverage of Title IV an "individual account plan," which, in turn, is defined

(Section 3(34)) as a "pension plan which provides for an individual account for each participant and for benefits based

solely upon the amount contributed to the participant's account." We note that you describe your plan as one where a

portion of the employer's income is "allocated among the participant's account." We note that you describe your plan as

one where a portion of the employer's income is "allocated among the participants" and that "no representation is made

in the plan or otherwise as to the value of the participant's account upon distribution." On this basis it appears that your

plan is not covered by Title IV and premiums are not due to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. [*2] 

Charles Skopic 

Acting Executive Director
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.
One Belvedere Place, Suite 330
Mill Valley, California 94941


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master
Servicer and Securities Administrator (in such capacity, "Wells Fargo"), hereby
certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2012 (the
"reporting period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A
hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.


October 30, 2013

/s/ Julie Eichler
JULIE EICHLER
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012, by and among SEQUOIA
RESIDENTIAL FUNDING, INC., as Depositor and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. as Master
Servicer and Securities Administrator and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as
Trustee relating to the Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-2 Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2012-2

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.

Schedule B

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not applicable

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 251

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with regard to the

escalating violence in East Timor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 16 (legislative day, JULY 15), 1999

Mr. LUTHER (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. HORN, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr.

BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. MINGE, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. FARR of

California, Mr. STARK, and Mr. CAPUANO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with

regard to the escalating violence in East Timor.

Whereas a May 5, 1999, agreement between the Republic of

Indonesia and the Portuguese Republic provided for the

establishment of a United Nations mission in East

Timor;

Whereas that mission enables the Secretary-General of the

United Nations to effectively carry out the referendum on

the independence of East Timor;

Whereas the Secretary-General of the United Nations has

postponed the United Nations-organized August 8, 1999,

vote on the future of East Timor;
2

•HRES 251 IH

Whereas United Nations outposts have been attacked on at

least five separate occasions between June 29 and July

8, 1999, and personnel have been threatened and injured;

Whereas militiamen opposed to a referendum on independence for East Timor fired at a convoy of foreign and local

humanitarian workers;

Whereas the United Nations staff members are unarmed and

rely on the Indonesian police for protection; and

Whereas increasing violence by armed militia groups, backed

by the Indonesian military, designed to intimidate the

population, has led to the withdrawal of United Nations

staff from the towns of Liquica and Maliano: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports the May 5, 1999, agreement be3 tween the Republic of Indonesia and the Portuguese

4 Republic on the question of the independence of

5 East Timor;

6 (2) expresses its concern about the unabated es7 calating violence in East Timor;

8 (3) urges the Indonesian Government to guar9 antee the protection of United Nations staff mem10 bers assisting in the preparation of the referendum;

11 (4) demands that the Indonesian Government

12 ensure that the vote in East Timor is carried out in

13 a secure atmosphere by—
3

•HRES 251 IH

1 (A) ceasing Indonesian military (known as

2 the TNI) and police support for paramilitary

3 forces;

4 (B) disarming paramilitary units in fulfill5 ment of its responsibilities under the terms of

6 the May 5 agreement;

7 (C) opening access to East Timor to inde8 pendent international monitors, observers, and

9 relief workers; and

10 (D) allowing the return of exiled East

11 Timorese and securing their safety;

12 (5) endorses the purpose of the United Nations

13 Assistance Mission in East Timor to carry out a free

14 and fair vote; and

15 (6) encourages the Administration to support

16 United Nations action to secure United Nations per17 sonnel and to better supervise the vote in East

18 Timor.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00816-CV

Style: Curocom Energy LLC and Curo Holdings Co. Ltd

v Woong Soon Eem and Jason Kim

Date motion filed: February 13, 2015

Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel

Party filing motion:

Counsel for Woong Soon Eem; Jason Kim; Woolim Resources Development Company, 

Ltd.; Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC; and Woolim Construction Company, Ltd.

The Kim Law Firm and Patterson PC have filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for Woong Soon Eem; Jason Kim;

Woolim Resources Development Company, Ltd.; Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC; and Woolim Construction 

Company, Ltd. (collectively referenced as the “Woolim Parties” in the motion).

The motion to withdraw as counsel is granted. The Court requests that counsel send a copy of this order to the last 

known address for each of the Woolim Parties.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting individually

Date: February 24, 2015
#### § 518.13 When may the Commission revoke a certificate of self-regulation?

If the Office of Self-Regulation determines that the tribe no longer meets or did not comply with the eligibility criteria of § 518.3, the approval criteria of § 518.5, the requirements of § 518.10, or the requirements of § 518.11, the Office of Self-Regulation shall prepare a written recommendation to the Commission and deliver a copy of the recommendation to the tribe. The Office of Self-Regulation's recommendation shall state the reasons for the recommendation and shall advice the tribe of its right to a hearing under part 584 of this chapter or right to appeal under part 585 of this chapter. The Commission may, after an opportunity for a hearing, revoke a certificate of self-regulation by a majority vote of its members if it determines that the tribe no longer meets the eligibility criteria of § 518.3, the approval criteria of § 518.5, the requirements of § 518.10 or the requirements of § 518.11.

[87 FR 62987, Oct. 18, 2022]
### §8454a. Midshipmen: nomination in event of death, resignation, or expulsion from office of Member of Congress otherwise authorized to nominate

(a) Senators.—In the event a Senator does not submit all nominations for midshipmen allocated to such Senator for an academic year in accordance with section 8454(a)(3) of this title, due to death, resignation from office, or expulsion from office, and the date of the swearing-in of the Senator's successor as Senator occurs after the date of the deadline for submittal of nominations for midshipmen for the academic year, the nominations for midshipmen for such academic year, otherwise authorized to be made by the Senator pursuant to such section, may be made instead by the other Senator from the State of such Representative.

(b) Representatives.—In the event a Representative does not submit all nominations for midshipmen allocated to such Representative for an academic year in accordance with section 8454(a)(4) of this title, due to death, resignation from office, or expulsion from office, and the date of the swearing-in of the Representative's successor as Representative occurs after the date of the deadline for submittal of nominations for midshipmen for the academic year, the nominations for midshipmen for such academic year, otherwise authorized to be made by the Representative pursuant to such section, may be made instead by the Senators from the State of such Representative, with such nominations divided equally among such Senators and any remainder going to the senior Senator from the State.

(c) Rule of Construction.—The nomination of a midshipman by a Member of Congress pursuant to this section shall not be construed to permanently reallocate nominations under section 8454 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, §553(b)(1), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1737.)
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-191588) pertaining to the Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
Empire State Realty OP, L.P. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan of our reports (a) dated March 24, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. and (b) dated March 24, 2014
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Empire State Building Company, L.L.C. and Affiliates, each included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2013.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                     
|New York, New York   
|                     
|March 24, 2014
### §888. Art. 88. Contempt toward officials

Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 67; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(25), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2922; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(a)(3), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3440.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 888 | 50:682. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 88), 64 Stat. 135. |

The word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity. The words "the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession" are substituted for the words "Vice President, Congress, Secretary of Defense, or a Secretary of a Department, a Governor or a legislature of any State, Territory, or other possession of the United States".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–163 struck out "Territory," after "State,".

2002—Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "Secretary of Homeland Security" for "Secretary of Transportation".

1980—Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "Secretary of Transportation" for "Secretary of the Treasury".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
# C_2006178EN.01002401.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/24

---

Action brought on 29 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-239/06)

(2006/C 178/38)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Wilms, C. Cattabriga, L. Visaggio, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the Italian Republic, by refusing to calculate and pay the own resources which were improperly not collected as a result of the exemption from import duties unilaterally applied to material used for military purposes and the default interest due by reason of the failure to make those own resources available to the Commission in good time, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 9, 10 and 11 of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89 and the corresponding provisions of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Italian Republic, by refusing to calculate and pay the own resources which were improperly not collected as a result of the exemption from import duties unilaterally applied to material used for military purposes and the default interest due by reason of the failure to make those own resources available to the Commission in good time, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 9, 10 and 11 of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89 and the corresponding provisions of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000.

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the view of the Commission, the exemption from customs duties unilaterally granted by Italy during the period preceding the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 150/2003 (1) amounted to an unlawful derogation from Article 26 EC and from Community customs legislation, resulting in an unjustifiable reduction in customs revenue, which constitutes the Community's own resources. Despite the applicant's repeated requests, the Italian Government has refused to calculate and pay to the Community the amounts corresponding to the own resources consequently evaded during the period between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2002, and to pay default interest on the said amounts, as laid down by the legislation in force in this area.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 25, p. 1.

1

---
### [§372. Renumbered §272]