alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

55 0 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

**A****NNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLI ANCE**

 

  Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling  and Servicing  Agreement  dated as of April 1, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee and Pentalpha  Surveillance  LLC,  as  Trust  Advisor,  with  respect  to  Commercial  Mortgage  Pass- Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bob e r, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.         A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

 

 

 

/s/  Daniel Bober            

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (210)
<INVENTORY>                                     16,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,863
<PP&E>                                         131,255
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 227,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,887
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,250
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,737)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   227,735
<SALES>                                        225,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,060
<CGS>                                          203,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (294)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,193
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,161)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Reporting & Disclosure 
-  Section 4063 Notices 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Section 4063 Notices

Section 4063 of ERISA requires that a plan administrator notify PBGC if either of the following occurs:
                          - a substantial employer withdraws from a multiple employer plan (Section 4063);  or
                          - an employer who is a contributing sponsor has a substantial cessation of operations at a facility (Sections 4062(e) and 4063(a))

The notice under Section 4063 is in addition to any Reportable Event notice that may be required under Section 4043.

The notice should identify the affected plan and employer, and include a statement that there has been a withdrawal by a substantial employer from a multiple employer plan or a cessation of operations under Section 4062(e), and a request that PBGC determine the resulting liability. PBGC has issued a 4062(e) form series which may be used for 4062(e) reporting.

The notice must be filed with the PBGC’s Corporate Finance & Restructuring Department (CFRD) within 60 days of the withdrawal or cessation. It may be mailed to CFRD at 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20024-2101, or emailed to 4063.report@pbgc.gov (for withdrawals) or 4062e@pbgc.gov (for cessations). For answers to questions or other assistance, email 4063.report@pbgc.gov (for withdrawals) or 4062e@pbgc.gov (for cessations), or call 202-326-4070. TTY/TTD users may call the Federal Relay Service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-4070.

September 13, 2022

##           Related Information      

Withdrawal Liability

ERISA Section 4062(e)

Frequently Asked Questions About ERISA 4062(e)

4062(e) Forms
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Eric J. Pulaski, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of BindView Development
Corporation (the Company), certify that (i) the
Companys Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 for the quarter ended March
31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of
operations of the Company. By
    
    /s/ ERIC J. PULASKIEric J. PulaskiChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 20, 2004
 A signed original of the foregoing certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              Three Months Ended                  Six Months Ended
                                                  December 31,                       December 31,
                                             2001              2000              2001            2000
                                             ----              ----              ----            ----
<S>                                         <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Net Income                                  $206,178         $100,282         $370,397         $205,880
                                            ========         ========         ========         ========


Weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation          363,975          363,975          363,975          363,975
                                            ========         ========         ========         ========

Basic earnings per share                    $   0.57         $   0.28         $   1.02         $    .57
                                            ========         ========         ========         ========


Weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation          363,975          363,975          363,975          363,975

Common stock equivalents due to
  dilutive effect of stock options             3,595            3,131            4,243            2,586
                                            --------         --------         --------         --------
Weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for
  diluted computation                        367,570          367,106          368,218          366,561
                                            ========         ========         ========         ========

Diluted earnings per share                  $   0.56         $   0.27         $   1.01         $   0.56
                                            ========         ========         ========         ========

</TABLE>
,JOB' Intern"atiol1al:CteditCard<Co:,Ltd~ ,240' StocKton: Street'Suifir, 000:; SetO"~raoci!3c6; 'CA94:1'08 

,',', :TE:L(4t5)956~4229' .. FAX..(415;);956~4341' 

·M~ditJ.th,2()10"' ' 

The Honorable Ray LaHooq, ' 

United States Department ofTransportation " 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of}CB International Credit Card Co.,Ltd, I am writing to express our 

strong support forJhe applkation of Delta Air Lines for new nonstop service between 

Seattle and Haneda, TokyoInternatiorial Airport. 

Approval of Delta's new service would b~ a majotbelldfitfor our region, where 

many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are many 

Japanese companies located in Washington, and hundreds more whose business models 

rely on access to Japan and it's market. The growth ofour business ties with Japan has 

created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the 

convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Seattle is proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as airports that can support 

trans-pacific routes. The addition of Haneda as a destination is a natural fit that would 

clearly benefit our travelers. . 

Thank you-for consideration ofthis request·< 

Sincerely, 

Koji Nishitani 

VP / Branch Manager 

JCB International Credit Card Co.,Ltd. 

240 Stockton St, #1000 

San Francisco, CA, 94108
#### § 117.23 Transactions between guardian and ward.

Business dealings between the guardian and his ward involving the sale or purchase of any property, real or personal, by the guardian to or from the ward, or to or from any store, company or organization in which the guardian has a direct interest or concern or contrary to the policy of the Department and shall not be approved by the superintendent without specific authority from the Commissioner.
### [§2359b. Renumbered §4062]
# C_2006224EN.01004402.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/44

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 June 2006 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-110/05) (1)

1

(Avian influenza - Exceptional support measures in the egg sector - Absence of exceptional support measures in the poultrymeat sector - Action for annulment - Inadmissible)

(2006/C 224/95)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Aiello, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga and L. Visaggio, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2102/2004 of 9 December 2004 on certain exceptional market support measures for eggs in Italy (OJ 2004 L 365, p. 10), in so far as it fails to provide exceptional market support measures in the poultrymeat sector in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (OJ 1975 L 282, p. 77).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 115 of 14. 5.2005.

1

---
### §4845. Armament retooling and manufacturing

The Secretary of the Army is authorized by chapter 764 of this title to carry out programs for the support of armaments retooling and manufacturing in the national defense industrial and technology base.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title III, §344(c)(1)(B)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–71, §2522; amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1840; renumbered §4845, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1869(d)(1), as added Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(p)(1)(A), (B), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2148.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1869(d)(1), as added by Pub. L. 117–81, §1701(p)(1)(A), (B), renumbered section 2522 of this title as this section.

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "chapter 764" for "chapter 434".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 applicable as if included in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and note below.

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SHAUN V. MACLAUCHLAN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3118

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 20, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K.

Fernandez, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maclauchlan v. State, 160 So. 3d 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) 

(table decision); Lewis v. State, 625 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

KELLY, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
#### § 212.34 Individual tribal assignments excluded.

The reference in this part to Indian mineral owners does not include assignments of tribal lands made pursuant to tribal constitutions or ordinances for the use of individual Indians and assignees of such lands.
§ 167.9 Grazing permits. ( a ) All livestock grazed on the Navajo Reservation must be covered by an authorized grazing permit issued by the Superintendent based upon the recommendations of the District Grazing Committee. All such grazing permits will be automatically renewed annually until terminated. District Grazing Committees shall act on all grazing permit changes resulting from negotiability within their respective Districts. The number of livestock that may be grazed under each permit shall be the number originally permitted plus or minus any changes as indicated by Transfer Agreements and Court Judgment Orders.
( b ) Any permittee who has five or more horses on his current permit will be required to apply any acquired sheep units in classes of stock other than horses. If the purchaser wishes more than his present number of horses, he must have his needs evaluated by the District Grazing Committee. Yearling colts will be counted against permitted number on all permits with six or more horses. Yearling colts will not be counted against permitted number on all permits with less than six horses. In hardship cases the District Grazing Committee may reissue horses removed from grazing permits through negotiability to permit holders who are without sufficient horses on their present permits to meet minimum needs.
( c ) No permittee shall be authorized to graze more than ten head of horses or to accumulate a total of over 350 sheep units.
( d ) Upon recommendation of the District Grazing Committee and with the approval of the Superintendent, grazing permits may be transferred from one permittee to another in accordance with instructions provided by the Advisory Committee of the Navajo Tribal Council, or may be inherited; provided that the permitted holdings of any individual permittee shall not exceed 350 sheep units or the equivalent thereof. Should inheritance or other acquisition of permits increase the holdings of any permittee to more than 350 sheep units, said permittee shall dispose of all livestock in excess of 350 sheep units not later than November 15 following date of inheritance or other acquisition, and that portion of his or her permit in excess of 350 sheep units within one year from date of inheritance.
( e ) By request of a permittee to sublet all or a part of his or her regular grazing permit to a member of his family or to any person who would receive such permit by inheritance, such subletting of permits may be authorized by the District Grazing Committee and the Superintendent or his authorized representative.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Stephen V. Clark, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q/A of Bertucci’s Corporation;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.             The Registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted]for the Registrant and have:

a.               designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.              [omitted]

c.               evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.              disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.            The Registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe Registrant’s board of directors:

a.               all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.              any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: January 19, 2006

 
|   |   | By:                                   | /s/  Stephen V. Clark |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   |   | Stephen  V. Clark                     |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer and Director |

 

----
### [§2325. Renumbered §3761]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2325, added Pub. L. 99–500, §101(c) [title X, §907(a)(1)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–82, 1783–137, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(c) [title X, §907(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–82, 3341–137; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title IX, formerly title IV, §907(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3917, renumbered title IX, Pub. L. 100–26, §3(5), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 273; amended Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XVI, §1622(c)(5), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1604; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §810, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1595; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, §904(d)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1728, directed Secretary of Defense to ensure that requirements of Department of Defense with respect to procurement of supplies be stated in terms of functions to be performed, performance required, or essential physical characteristics, and related to preference for nondevelopmental items in procurement of supplies, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–355, title VIII, §8104(b)(1), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3391. See sections 3451 and 3453 of this title.

Another prior section 2325 was renumbered section 2345 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.137 Who can petition to invalidate an action for certain ICWA violations? ( a ) Any of the following may petition any court of competent jurisdiction to invalidate an action for foster-care placement or termination of parental rights under state law where it is alleged that 25 U.S.C. 1911, 1912, or 1913 has been violated: ( 1 ) An Indian child who is or was the subject of any action for foster-care placement or termination of parental rights;
( 2 ) A parent or Indian custodian from whose custody such child was removed; and
( 3 ) The Indian child's Tribe.
( b ) Upon a showing that an action for foster-care placement or termination of parental rights violated any provision of 25 U.S.C. 1911, 1912, or 1913, the court must determine whether it is appropriate to invalidate the action.
( c ) To petition for invalidation, there is no requirement that the petitioner's rights under ICWA were violated; rather, a petitioner may challenge the action based on any violations of 25 U.S.C. 1911, 1912, or 1913 during the course of the child-custody proceeding.