alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table For 2014 Valuation Dates 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table for 2014 Valuation Dates

This mortality table is used to determine the present value of annuities in involuntary terminations and distress terminations of single-employer plans, as discussed in 29 CFR 4044. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

November 29, 2018

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.64 How may a Tribe assume management of development of different types of energy resources? ( a ) In order for a Tribe to assume authority for approving leases, business agreements, and rights-of-way for the development of another energy resource that is not included in the TERA, a Tribe must submit to the Secretary: ( 1 ) An amendment to the TERA that specifies and describes the additional Tribal land, energy resources, or categories of energy-related leases, business agreements, or rights-of-way that the Tribe intends to include in the TERA; and
( 2 ) A copy of the resolution or formal action of the Tribal governing body, or Tribal governing bodies if the land is held for the benefit of more than one Tribe, that approves submission of the TERA amendment.
( b ) Submission of the documents in paragraph (a) of this section will trigger the public notice and opportunity for comment consistent with § 224.67.
( c ) The Secretary will process the amendment in accordance with §§ 224.67 through 224.78.
( d ) Each Tribal governing body that is party to the TERA must sign the TERA amendment upon approval.
[84 FR 69612, Dec. 18, 2019]
### Alteration and geochemistry of Tertiary volcanic rocks in parts of the Virginia City Quadrangle, Nevada

By: Donald Harvey Whitebread

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp936

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### From: Hill, Jonathan [mailto:jhill@dowlohnes.coml 

### Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:43 AM 

### To: Rosenberg, Esta (OST); Jaffe, Darren (OST) Cc: robert.land@jetblue.com; Gurdoglanyan, Nicole 

### Subject: RE: JetBiue



### We have now heard from all airlines served with JetBlue's renewal application in docket 20009-0342 and no one has any objection. Jon

Jonathan B. Hill 

### Attorney atLaw

## ~· 

# DowLohnes Puc 1200 

### New Hampshire Avenue, NW Suite 8oo 

### Washington, DC 20036-6802 T 202-776-2725 M 202-460-.5496 F 202-776-4725 

### E jhill@dowlohnes.com 

### www.dowlohnes.com

This message from the law finn of Dow Lohnes PLLC may contain corlfidentialorprit•ileged iliformation. 

### If you received thi..-; transmission in error,please calltts immediately at (202)776-2000 or contact us byE-mail atadmin@dowlohnes.com. Disclosure or use of anypart of this message bypersons other than the intended recipient isprohibited.
# C_2006178EN.01002904.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy)) — Francesco Rauty v Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, Soprintendenza B.A.A. di Firenze, Prato e Pistoia; intervener: Consiglio Nazionale degli Ingegneri; and Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Pistoia v Francesco Rauty and Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali; intervener: Consiglio Nazionale degli Ingegneri

(Case C-271/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 178/51)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 229, 17.9.2005.

1

---
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45251

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ZACHARY ADDISON NAVRATIL,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 397A

Filed: April 2, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

AMENDED OPINION

THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION 

DATED MARCH 22, 2018, 

IS HEREBY AMENDED

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Renae J. Hoff, District Judge. 

Order revoking probation, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Zachary Addison Navratil pled guilty to burglary, Idaho Code § 18-1401. The district 

court imposed a unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of three 

years, but after a period of retained jurisdiction, suspended the sentence and placed Navratil on 

probation. Subsequently, Navratil admitted to violating the terms of the probation, and the 

district court consequently revoked probation and ordered execution of the original sentence. 
2

Navratil appeals, contending that the district court abused its discretion in declining to retain 

jurisdiction a second time.

The primary purpose of the retained jurisdiction program is to enable the trial court to 

obtain additional information regarding the defendant’s rehabilitative potential and suitability for 

probation, and probation is the ultimate objective of a defendant who is on retained jurisdiction. 

State v. Chapel, 107 Idaho 193, 687 P.2d 583 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 

567, 650 P.2d 707, 709 (Ct. App. 1982). There can be no abuse of discretion in a trial court’s 

refusal to retain jurisdiction if the court already has sufficient information upon which to 

conclude that the defendant is not a suitable candidate for probation. State v. Beebe, 113 Idaho 

977, 979, 751 P.2d 673, 675 (Ct. App. 1988); Toohill, 103 Idaho at 567, 650 P.2d at 709. Based 

upon the information that was before the district court at the time of sentencing, we hold that the 

district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to retain jurisdiction a second time in 

this case.

Applying the foregoing standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot 

say that the district court abused its discretion either in revoking probation or in declining to 

retain jurisdiction. Therefore, the order revoking probation and directing execution of Navratil’s 

previously suspended sentence is affirmed.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 401

Providing for a committee to notify the President of the assembly of the

Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 2000

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for a committee to notify the President of the

assembly of the Congress.

1 Resolved, That a committee of two Members be ap2 pointed by the Speaker on the part of the House of Rep3 resentatives to join with a committee on the part of the

4 Senate to notify the President of the United States that

5 a quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is

6 ready to receive any communication that he may be

7 pleased to make.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 30, 1999 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MAY 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,658
<INVENTORY>                                     72,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,239
<PP&E>                                          84,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,219
<BONDS>                                        190,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           170
<OTHER-SE>                                     (31,712)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,164
<SALES>                                        297,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               297,523
<CGS>                                          170,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  276,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,849
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,008
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       503
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 122.8 Administrative costs for management of the fund.

Funds available for expenditures may be used by the Osage Tribal Education Committee in the performance of its duties and responsibilities. Recordkeeping is required and proposed expenditures are to be attached with the August 1 proposed annual budget to the Assistant Secretary or his/her designated representative.
**Item 13**

Provide written explanation and supporting documents of how the facilit y could use NO X CEMs for process optimization.

**Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation of the**  **response:** Stephani Campbell, Teresa Simetkosky , Chriss y Bartovich

**Answer:**

The indurating furnaces are complicated processes that have numerous variables to operation. Each process variable is carefully measured and monitored to ensure the process is r unning as needed. Minntac treats NOx emissions much like an y other process variable. Inour experience specific to NOx, t he CEMS units have acted as yet another process indicator that could provide notice of an undesired condition, such as preheat burne rs not being properl y lit or fuel use being too high . The CEMS data has been used to track emissions trends that may not otherwise be identified.

In order to evaluate the performance of the process, having accurate data is essential. Having the CEMS e nables real time data which shows process changes, as opposed to a snapshot of a stack test. A corollary

to this is dust collector monitoring. Prior to the Taconite MACT readings were taken once per day . Once continuous parametric monitoring was install ed we learned more about our systems due to the frequency and volume of data being collected.

Having CEMS installed allowed for convenient data collection when conducting NOx reduction tests. Having the CEMS data readil y available expedited the data coll ection and subsequent review. A fter the installation of the low NOx main burners on Lines 6 and 7 , the CEMS enabled U.S. Steel to more quickly evaluate the performance of different operating parameters to optimize the burner performance. This is also th e case for process improvements conducted on the other lines.
§ 291.1 Purpose and scope. The regulations in this part establish procedures that the Secretary will use to promulgate rules for the conduct of Class III Indian gaming when: ( a ) A State and an Indian tribe are unable to voluntarily agree to a compact and;
( b ) The State has asserted its immunity from suit brought by an Indian tribe under 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(7)(B).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# COPE SOUTH 15 Launches in Bangladesh

By 1st Lt. Jake BaileyPacific Air Force Public Affairs

                BAF BASE BANGABANDHU, Bangladesh  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

COPE SOUTH 15 Launches in Bangladesh

PACOM News

articles
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Enterprises Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Neils Reijers
---------------------------------
Neils Reijers
Chief Financial Officer
May 21, 2004

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 ("Section  906"), or other document  authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been  provided  to  Satellite  Enterprises  Corp.  and will be  retained  by
Satellite  Enterprises  Corp.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4206]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuance

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           License No.                        Name/Address                           Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
004094NF.........................  All Transport, Inc., 8369 NW.      December 24, 2010.
                                    66th Street, Miami, FL 33166.
004441N..........................  Econoquality Freight Forwarders,   January 13, 2011.
                                    Inc., dba EQ Line, 3201 NW.
                                    116th Street, Suite B, Miami, FL
                                    33167.
020577N..........................  Bosmak, Inc. dba Ocean Breeze      January 14, 2011.
                                    Shipping, 2501 Harford Road,
                                    Baltimore, MD 21218.
021262NF.........................  Amass International Group Inc.,    December 18, 2010.
                                    13191 Crossroads Parkway North,
                                    Suite 385, City of Industry, CA
                                    91746.
021370NF.........................  Encargo Export Corporation dba,    December 28, 2010.
                                    Encargo Lines dba Encargo
                                    Logistics, 10800 NW. 103rd
                                    Street, Suite 5-E, Medley, FL
                                    33178.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2011-4206 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.143 How does this subpart apply to pending proceedings?

None of the provisions of this subpart affects a proceeding under State law for foster-care placement, termination of parental rights, preadoptive placement, or adoptive placement that was initiated prior to December 12, 2016, but the provisions of this subpart apply to any subsequent proceeding in the same matter or subsequent proceedings affecting the custody or placement of the same child.
§ 179.102 How does the Secretary calculate the value of a remainder and a life estate? ( a ) If income is subject to division, the Secretary will use Actuarial Table S, Valuation of Annuities, found at 26 CFR 20.2031, to determine the value of the interests of the holders of remainder interests and the life tenant.
( b ) Actuarial Table S, Valuation of Annuities, specifies the share attributable to the life estate and remainder interests, given the age of the life tenant and an established rate of return published by the Secretary in the Federal Register. We may periodically review and revise the percent rate of return to be used to determine the share attributable to the interests of the life tenant and the holders of remainder interests. The life tenant will receive the balance of the distribution after the shares of the holders of remainder interests have been calculated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      58,149,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,007,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            62,398,044
<PP&E>                                       7,152,071
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,008,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,106,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,081,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       116,889
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,908,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,106,250
<SALES>                                     11,382,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,382,304
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,076,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,218,720)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,475,666)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,475,666)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,475,666)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)
        

</TABLE>