alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4989

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SHANNON NICKORY MATHIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-97-381)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 22, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin T. Stepp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellant. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Shannon Nickory Mathis appeals from his conviction and sentence imposed for possession with intent to distribute “crack”

cocaine. We affirm.

Mathis’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), concluding that there are no

meritorious grounds for appeal, but raising the issues of whether

the district court complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 when it

accepted Mathis’s guilty plea and whether the district court

properly applied the United States Sentencing Guidelines to the

factual findings made at sentencing. Our review of the record

reveals that the district court was in compliance with Rule 11 and

properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines in its imposition of

sentence. Pursuant to Anders, this court has reviewed the record

for potential error and has found none. Accordingly, we affirm.

This court requires that counsel inform his client, in

writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United

States for further review. If the client requests that a petition

be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw

from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy

thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
3

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### [§2304d. Renumbered §3401]
# C_2014089EN.01007301.xml

| 28.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/73

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014

2014/C 89/18

On page 21, the text referring to the State Aid No SA.37544 is cancelled and replaced by the following:

‘Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 17.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37544 (2013/N) |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aides à la publicité en faveur des produits viticoles |
| Legal basis | — | L. 621-1 du code rural et de la pêche maritime |

Date of adoption of the decision

17.12.2013

Aid number

SA.37544 (2013/N)

Member State

France

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aides à la publicité en faveur des produits viticoles

Legal basis

—

L. 621-1 du code rural et de la pêche maritime

| — | L. 1511-1 et suivants du code général des collectivités territoriales |
| --- | --- |

—

L. 1511-1 et suivants du code général des collectivités territoriales

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Advertising (AGRI)

Form of aid

Other

Budget

| | Overall budget: EUR 9 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 9 (in millions)

| | Annual budget: EUR 9 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 9 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

01.01.2014-31.12.2014

Economic sectors

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministère de l'agriculture, de l'agroalimentaire et de la forêt |
| --- |
| 3 rue barbet de jouy 75349 paris 07 |

Ministère de l'agriculture, de l'agroalimentaire et de la forêt

3 rue barbet de jouy 75349 paris 07

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm’

---
IV

House Calendar No. 205

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 473

[Report No. 106–576]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4199) to terminate the Internal

Revenue Code of 1986.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 2000

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4199) to

terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

3 4199) to terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

4 The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. An

5 amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the

6 text of H.R. 4230 shall be considered as adopted. The pre7 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,

8 as amended, to final passage without intervening motion
2

HRES 473 RH

1 except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended,

2 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank3 ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and

4 Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without

5 instructions.

House Calendar No. 205

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 473

[Report No. 106–576]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4199)

to terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

APRIL 12, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.P., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.W., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 81 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NOS. WR-83,092-01 & - 02
EX P ARTE KELIAM LADARIUS RUDD, Applicant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. W06-00774-I(A) & W05-74121-I(A ) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of h ab ea s co rp u s . Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offe nses of ag g ravated assault of a public serva nt with a deadly wea

pon and ag g ravated robber y with a deadly
wea pon and sentenc ed to life imprisonment and thirty y ear s’ imprisonment, respe ctively
. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff

irmed Applicant’s convictions in Rudd v. State , Nos. 05-07-00447- CR & 05-07- 00448-CR (Tex.App.—Dallas Aug . 4, 2008)(not desig nated f or publication) On October 17, 2014, an order designating issues was signed by the t rial court. I t appea rsthat the trial court has not c ompleted its fa ct finding in the se case s. We r emand these applications

to the Criminal District Court No. 2 to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar y investigation and ente r finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this orde r. A supplemental transcript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of t he date of this order. Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court.
Filed: Apr il 29, 2015 Do not publish
§ 162.341 How will BIA decide whether to approve a residential lease? ( a ) We will approve a residential lease unless: ( 1 ) The required consents have not been obtained from the parties to the lease;
( 2 ) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
( 3 ) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
( b ) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian landowners' determination that the residential lease is in their best interest.
( c ) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of a lease.
cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge Ian Armese Woods Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
#### ADAMS v. BASS

No. 572P89

Case below: 88 N.C.App. 599326 N.C. 363

Motion by defendant for reconsideration of petition for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 April 1990.
#### § 217.6 Method of casting votes.

Within 30 days after an issue and any analysis provided for in §§ 217.4 and 217.5 have been submitted to the joint managers for resolution, they shall each notify the superintendent in writing of the number of votes cast for and against the proposed or alternative solutions. If either of the joint managers fails or refuses to cast his votes and to notify the superintendent thereof within the time specified, the superintendent may conclude that such joint managers' votes have been cast against the proposed solution or solutions; or, if no solutions have been proposed, for the maintenance of the status quo. At the time they notify the superintendent of the votes cast on an issue, each joint manager shall furnish to the superintendent a certified copy of a resolution of the business committee or the board of directors, as the case may be, authorizing such vote.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, in connection with the Annual Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Annual Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.       The Annual Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.       The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:March 26, 2015

 

|   |                                                                                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Mark Gatto

Mark  Gatto  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |
|   | CĪON  Investment Corporation                                                                         |

 

 

----
# C_2013295EN.01000901.xml

| 11.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/9

---

Corrigendum to an amendment application published pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2013/C 134/10)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 134 of 14 May 2013
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 134 of 14 May 2013

2013/C 295/07

On pages 39 and 42:

for:

‘ “MIEL DE CORSE”/“MELE DI CORSICA” ’,

read:

‘ “MIEL DE CORSE - MELE DI CORSICA” ’;

on page 40, point 3.3, second paragraph,

on page 41, point 3.3, last paragraph and point 3.4(c),

on page 42, point 3.6, second paragraph, point 1 and point 3.2, first and third paragraphs,

on page 45, point 3.7, first paragraph and first indent, and second paragraph,

on page 47, point 5.2, first paragraph:

for:

‘ “Miel de Corse”/“Mele di Corsica” ’,

read:

‘ “Miel de Corse - Mele di Corsica” ’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 478 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 478

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 773) to amend the Older 
 Americans Act of 1965 to extend the authorizations of appropriations 
            for that Act, and to make technical corrections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2000

  Mr. Minge (for himself, Mr. DeFazio, and Ms. Baldwin) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 773) to amend the Older 
 Americans Act of 1965 to extend the authorizations of appropriations 
            for that Act, and to make technical corrections.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House 
resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the 
Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 773) to amend the Older 
Americans Act of 1965 to extend the authorizations of appropriations 
for that Act, and to make technical corrections. The first reading of 
the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to 
the bill and shall not exceed 2 hours equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education 
and the Workforce. After general debate the bill shall be considered 
for amendment under the five-minute rule. Each section shall be 
considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the 
Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 in rule XVIII. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment, the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may 
have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 
on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion, except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has 
come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day the 
House shall, immediately after the third daily order of business under 
clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for 
further consideration of the bill.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HOST
MARRIOTT, L.P. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-10-1999
<CASH>                                             290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      307
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           8,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          2,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,324
<SALES>                                            885
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   937
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    181
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     17
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       198
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66


</TABLE>
#### § 293.29 May any other contract outside of a compact regulate Indian gaming?

No. Subject to §§ 293.4(b) and 293.8(d), any contract or other agreement between a Tribe and a State, its agencies, or its political subdivisions that seeks to regulate a Tribe's right to conduct gaming—as limited by IGRA—is a gaming compact that must comply with IGRA and be submitted for review and approval by the Secretary consistent with § 293.8. A Tribe may submit any other agreement between the Tribe and the State, its agencies, or its political subdivisions for a determination if the agreement is a compact or amendment under § 293.4(c). This includes agreements mandated or required by a compact or amendment, which contain provisions for the payment from a Tribe's gaming revenue or restricts or regulates a Tribe's use and enjoyment of its Indian lands, including a Tribe's conduct of gaming.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 17 February 2011, at 10 a.m. in the Commission offices at the National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, parks and memorials.

                    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission are available on our Web site:                     *http://www.cfa.gov.*                     Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address; by e-mailing                     *staff@cfa.gov;*                     or by calling 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.                

Dated February 8, 2011 in Washington, DC.

Thomas Luebke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-3563 Filed 2-16-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
H. Res. 329

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 14, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2679) to amend title 49, United States Code,

to establish the National Motor Carrier Administration in the

Department of Transportation, to improve the safety of commercial motor vehicle operators and carriers, to strengthen

commercial driver’s licenses, and for other purposes. The first

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order

against the bill and against its consideration are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed

one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The

amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as
2

•HRES 329 EH

adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole.

The bill, as amended, shall be considered by title rather than

by section. Each title shall be considered as read. Before consideration of any other amendment it shall be in order to consider the amendment printed in part B of the report of the

Committee on Rules, if offered by a Member designated in

the report. That amendment shall be considered as read, may

amend portions of the bill not yet read for amendment, and

shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question

in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. Points of

order against that amendment for failure to comply with

clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. During consideration of the

bill for further amendment, the Chairman of the Committee

of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis

of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it

to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of ques-
3

•HRES 329 EH

tions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill, as amended, to the House with such further amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall

be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and any

further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without

instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.