alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF APRIL 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           1,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                       408
<INVENTORY>                                     17,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,948
<PP&E>                                         138,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 263,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,631
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,250
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   263,840
<SALES>                                         85,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,682
<CGS>                                           74,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (8)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       989
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,371)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 273.134 What is the timeframe for contract decision?

The approving official will approve or disapprove the contract proposal within 90 days after the approving official receives the contract proposal and any additional information requested. The approving official may extend the 90-day deadline after obtaining the written consent of the applicant.
NICK J. RA HA LL, I I 3RD DISTRICT, WEST VIRGINIA COMM I TIEE ON TRA NS PORTATION AND I NFRASTR U CT URE RANKING MEMBER www.raha l l.hou se. gov 

# (!Congress of tbe mtntteb**~tntes** 

## J!,Jottse of ll\cpresentntiuen**~mm>uinnton,** 

### tDQ;: 20515

- 4803

The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, Southeast Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary Foxx: October 22, 2014 2307 RAYBURN BUILDING, WASHINGTON, DC 20515 4803 ( 2021 225-3452 109 MAIN STREET, BECKLEY, WV 25801-46 1 0 (304 1 252-5000 845 F IFf ll AVENUE, ROOM 152 HUNTlN GTOtl, wv 25701
- 2086 (3041522-NICK 60 1 f EOERAL STREET , ROOM 1 005

BLUEnE LD, WV 24701
- 3033 ( 3041325-6222 220 DINGESS STREET lOGAN , WV 2560 1 ( 304 1752-4934

I understand that the Department of Transportation is in the process of determining the appropriate Essential Air Service (EAS) subsidy for continued air service to the Raleigh Co un ty Memorial Airport in my district in West Virginia. As you know, reliable commercial air service is tremendously important to the people and businesses of Beckley, Raleigh County, and the surrounding area. I write to express my hope that the Department will give expeditious, full and fair consideration to the pending proposal of the Raleigh County Memorial Airport and community partners for air service subsidies. With Federal assistance, our airport and its partners are prepared to work together to make sure that air service at Beckley thrives for years to come. I appreciate the Department's continu ed commitment to sma ll community air service and to nnming the EAS program in a manner that serves the public interest. With warm regards, I am**Sinccr~ly, ~** 

# ALL, II Member of Congress NJR/js

G) THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MAD E OF RECYCL E D FIB ERS
### §630. Discharge of commissioned officers with less than six years of active commissioned service or found not qualified for promotion for first lieutenant or lieutenant (junior grade)

The Secretary of the military department concerned, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense—

(1) may discharge any officer on the active-duty list who—

(A) has less than six years of active commissioned service; or

(B) is serving in the grade of second lieutenant or ensign and has been found not qualified for promotion to the grade of first lieutenant or lieutenant (junior grade); and

(2) shall, unless the officer has been promoted, discharge any officer described in paragraph (1)(B) at the end of the 18-month period beginning on the date on which the officer is first found not qualified for promotion.

(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, §105, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2861; amended Pub. L. 98–525, title XIV, §1405(11), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2622; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §505(d)(2), (4)(A), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1088; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title V, §505(b), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1457; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title V, §503(a)(1), (2), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 95.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–181, §503(a)(2), substituted "six years" for "five years" in section catchline.

Par. (1)(A). Pub. L. 110–181, §503(a)(1), substituted "six years" for "five years".

2003—Par. (2). Pub. L. 108–136 substituted "paragraph" for "clause".

2001—Pub. L. 107–107, §505(d)(4)(A), struck out "regular" before "commissioned officers" in section catchline.

Par. (1). Pub. L. 107–107, §505(d)(2), struck out "regular" before "officer" in introductory provisions and before "grade of first lieutenant" in subpar. (B).

1984—Par. (2). Pub. L. 98–525 substituted "18-month" for "eighteen-month".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to prescribe regulations under this section effective on Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
# C_2006224EN.01001802.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2006 — Medion AG v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

(Case C-208/06)

(2006/C 224/33)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Medion AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg

Defendant:

Question referred

Should a camcorder, which at the time of importation (1) is unable to record video signals from an external source, be classified under subheading 8525 4099 of the Combined Nomenclature, if its video interface can subsequently be reconfigured as a video input by means of activating certain switches, even though the manufacturer and the seller neither have mentioned nor support this possibility?

1

---

(1)  Interpretation of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Amendment No. 1
to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lipocine Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mahesh V. Patel,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(d) and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|Dated: March 12, 2018 | /s/ Mahesh V. Patel                                                                         
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Mahesh V. Patel, President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
BEFORE THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON D.C. Petition of: DELTA AIR LINES, INC. OPERATING CERTIFICATE DALA026A For Extension ofExemption 11046 continued reliefofcertain requirements of 14 CFR 119.49(a)(4)(ii) Exemption 11046 Docket FAA-2014-0158

PETITION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC. Ladies/Gentlemen: To Extend Exemption 11046 January 

### 20, 2016 Pursuantto the provisions of 14 CFR Part 11, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL), petitions the Administratorto extend the effective date of Exemption No. 11046. The exemption grants Delta Air Lines relief from§ 119.49(a)(4)(ii) ofTitle 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Delta Air Lines to apply domesticand flag rules while conducting non-scheduled supplemental operationsto airports not listed in its operations specifications (OpSpecs), provided certain conditions and limitationsare met. The current exemption's expiration date is September 30, 

### 2016. The conditions and circumstances which warranted the original grant of exemption, in regard to public interest and equivalent levels ofsafety, continue to exist. This petition does not seek to change the conditions and limitations ofthe current exemption. The renewal ofthis exemption is not a controversial issue. Forthis reason,and the reasons stated above, Delta requests thata finding ofgood cause be made forwaiving publication in the FederalRegister, 

### (14 CFR 

### §11.87). Granting the requested relief will set no precedents. Theexistence oftheexemption is well known andwidely accepted. Please contact Chuck Schramek, Director- Flight Operations QA, Compliance & Business Support at

### 404-715-1112 (office) ifyou have questions or require additional information. Sincerely,

Step en M. Dickson SeniorVice President Flight Operations Delta AirLines, Inc. cc: Michael Drew, Office Manager, Delta Certificate Office- FAA John Brooke, Acting Principal Operations Inspector, Delta CMU - FAA
# C_2006225EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 September 2006

(2006/C 225/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2665 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4607 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67480 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1928 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5887 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,79 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2830 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5765 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,423 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9283 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5272 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,58 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,360 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8503 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6821 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4200 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8588 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9090 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0124 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 211,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2230 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0646 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4348 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 587,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,661 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,604 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9550 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,297 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2665

JPY

Japanese yen

149,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4607

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67480

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1928

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5887

ISK

Iceland króna

88,79

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2830

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5765

CZK

Czech koruna

28,423

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9283

RON

Romanian leu

3,5272

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,58

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,360

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8503

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6821

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4200

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8588

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9090

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0124

KRW

South Korean won

1 211,34

ZAR

South African rand

9,2230

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0646

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4348

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 587,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,661

PHP

Philippine peso

63,604

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9550

THB

Thai baht

47,297

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HOST
MARRIOTT, L.P. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 16, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-16-2000
<CASH>                                             155
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      262
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           8,482
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          2,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,160
<SALES>                                            356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   384
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (137)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      3
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (137)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplication of Background Oriented Schlieren for Altitude Testing of Rocket EnginesA series of experiments was performed to determine the feasibility of using the Background Oriented Schlieren, BOS, flow visualization technique to image a simulated, small, rocket engine, plume under altitude test conditions. Testing was performed at the NASA Glenn Research Centers Altitude Combustion Stand, ACS, using nitrogen as the exhaust gas simulant. Due to limited optical access to the facility test capsule, all of the hardware required to conduct the BOS were located inside the vacuum chamber. During the test series 26 runs were performed using two different nozzle configurations with pressures in the test capsule around 0.3 psia. No problems were encountered during the test series resulting from the optical hardware being located in the test capsule and acceptable resolution images were captured. The test campaign demonstrated the ability of using the BOS technique for small, rocket engine, plume flow visualization during altitude testing.Document ID20170010206Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWernet, Mark P.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Stiegemeier, Benjamin R.*(Axiometix, LLC Shawnee Mission, KS, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 19, 2017Publication DateOctober 1, 2017Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219578GRC-E-DAA-TN46876E-19424Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.20.01CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsBackground Oriented SchlierenRocket plumAvailable DownloadsNameType20170010206.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 273.170 What special program provisions must be included in the contract? All contracts must contain the following: ( a ) The education plan containing the education programs approved by the Indian Education Committee(s);
( b ) Any formal written determination and findings made by the BIE Director supporting the need for operational support as required by § 273.133(c); and
( c ) A provision that State, local, and other Federal Funds will be used to provide comparable services to non-Indian and Indian students prior to the use of Johnson-O'Malley funds for the provision of supplementary program services to Indian children, as required in § 273.143(b).
( d ) Public Laws 102-477 and 93-638 Self-Governance Tribes must submit their education plan as required by paragraph (a) of this section to the BIE Director for review. The BIE Director will forward copies of the education plans to the 477 office or the Office of Tribal Self-Governance, as appropriate.
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.83 What must a Tribe do after executing a lease or business agreement, or granting a right-of-way? Following the execution of a lease, business agreement, or grant of right-of-way under a TERA, a Tribe must: ( a ) Inform the public of approval of the lease, business agreement, or right-of-way under the authority granted in the TERA; and
( b ) Send a copy of the executed lease, business agreement, or right-of-way, or amendments, to the Secretary within one business day of execution. The copy must be sent by certified mail return receipt requested or by overnight delivery.
Next 60 Days

Key Events

FEbruary 2024 March 2024 tRANSITION

RESIDUAL FUEL tracker 

GALLONS rEMOVED 

*AMOUNT IS APPROXIMATE

CRI: Community Representation Initiative

DLNR: Department of Land and Natural Resources 

DISF: Defueling Information Sharing Forum

Joint Task Force – Red Hill

RESIDUAL FUEL TRACKER

As of February 5, 2024 

Subject to Revision

Dashboard Legend

March:

7 MAR - FUEL TANK ADVISORY COMMITTEE 

 MEETING

19 MAR - DLNR COMMISSION ON WATER 

 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MEETING

21 MAR - (Tentative) CRI MEETING

28 MAR - jtf-rh stands down 

February:

2 feb - brief to governor’s water 

 committee

7 FEB - JTF-RH/NCTF-RH TRANSITION 

 OPEN HOUSE

15 FEB- (Tentative) CRI meeting

22 FEB - DISF MEETING

transition open house

Ke’ehi Lagoon 

Memorial Park

4 - 7 p.m.

Click on the photo 

for an Enlarged pdf 

version

2 5 0 0 2

JTF-RH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING approximately 60,000 gallons of residual fuel

Visit the Navy Closure Task Force-Red Hill

Website by Scanning or clicking

the QR code below
# C_2006165EN.01002103.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/21

---

Action brought on 17 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-227/06)

(2006/C 165/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Schima and B. Stromsky, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by introducing a de facto obligation on economic operators wishing to market in Belgium construction products legally produced and/or marketed in another Member State of the European Union to obtain ‘BENOR’ or ‘ATG’ marks denoting conformity for the marketing of these products in Belgium, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 and 30 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by introducing a de facto obligation on economic operators wishing to market in Belgium construction products legally produced and/or marketed in another Member State of the European Union to obtain ‘BENOR’ or ‘ATG’ marks denoting conformity for the marketing of these products in Belgium, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 and 30 EC;

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The national measures at issue can be classified as State measures impeding free movement of goods not justified by considerations laid down in Article 30 EC or by imperative requirements of public interest and not satisfying the principle of proportionality.

---