alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 92 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                 H. R. 92

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 251 North Main Street in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, as the 
    ``Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 251 North Main Street in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, as the 
    ``Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 251 
North Main Street in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Hiram H. Ward 
Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
### §9011. Organization

The Department of the Air Force is separately organized under the Secretary of the Air Force. It operates under the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, §213(a), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 524, §8010; renumbered §8011, Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §521(a)(1), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1055; renumbered §9011, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(c), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8010 | 5:171a(c)(7) (1st sentence, as applicable to Department of Air Force). | July 26, 1947, ch. 343, §202(c)(7) (1st sentence as applicable to Department of Air Force); added Aug. 6, 1958, Pub. L. 85–599, §3(a) (1st sentence of 8th par., as applicable to Department of Air Force), 72 Stat. 516. |

The word "operates" is substituted for the words "shall function".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8011 of this title as this section.

1986—Pub. L. 99–433 renumbered section 8010 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-07-00110- CV In re Legends on Lak e LBJ, Ltd. ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M B URNET COUNTY ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N We deny the petition for writ of mandamus bec ause this Court is without j urisdiction. See M eye rland Co. v. FDIC , 848 S.W .2d 82 (Tex. 1993).

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and He nson Filed: F ebrua

ry 22, 2007
Exhibit 32

Section 906 Certification

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, updated pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Host
Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the sole general partner of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 26, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 5, 2010



/s/ W. Edward WalterW. Edward WalterChief Executive Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc./s/ Larry K. HarveyLarry K. HarveyChief Financial Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.




42
#### § 213.2 Applications for leases.

Applications for leases should be made to the Area Director.
# C_2006237EN.01000201.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/2

---

Action brought on 6 June 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-253/06)

(2006/C 237/03)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Simonetti and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by not bringing into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2003/35/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC, or by not informing the Commission thereof, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not bringing into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2003/35/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC, or by not informing the Commission thereof, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period laid down for implementing the directive expired on 25 June 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 156, p. 17.

1

---
### [§2279c. Renumbered §9081]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2279c was renumbered section 2279d of this title.
#### § 166.302 How is a range unit created?

We create a range unit after we consult with the Indian landowners of rangeland, by designating units of compatible size, availability, and location.
### §3106. Elements of the defense acquisition system: performance goals

(a) Performance Goals Under Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.—The annual performance plan prepared by the Department of Defense pursuant to section 1115 of title 31 shall include appropriate performance goals for elements of the defense acquisition system.

(b) Reporting Requirement.—The annual report prepared by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 1116 of title 31 shall address the Department's success in achieving performance goals established pursuant to such section for elements of the defense acquisition system.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1808(c)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4160.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 103–62, Aug. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 285, which enacted section 306 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, sections 1115 to 1119, 9703, and 9704 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and sections 2801 to 2805 of Title 39, Postal Service, amended section 1105 of Title 31, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 1101 and 1115 of Title 31. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1993 Amendment note set out under section 1101 of Title 31 and Tables.

#### Codification

The text of subsecs. (d) and (e) of section 2548 of this title, which were transferred first to section 3105(d) and (e) of this title and then to this section, redesignated as subsecs. (a) and (b), respectively, and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1808(a)(2), (c)(1), was based on Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, §861(a), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4289; amended Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(d)(5), (f)(30)(B), (C), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1951, 1953; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1081(a)(41), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1596.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1808(c)(1)(B), redesignated subsecs. (d) and (e) of section 3105 of this title as subsecs. (a) and (b), respectively, of this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2006178EN.01003501.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/35

---

Action brought on 19 May 2006 — En Route International Limited v OHIM

(Case T-147/06)

(2006/C 178/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: En Route International Limited (Berkshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: W. W. Göpfert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 7 March 2006 in Case R 352/2005-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 7 March 2006 in Case R 352/2005-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark 'FRESHHH' for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 32 (Application No 3 198 165).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The mark applied for is registrable; no grounds for refusal under Article 7(1)(b) and (c) or Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) stand in the way of its registration.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 11, 1994, p. 1).

1

---
IV

House Calendar No. 79

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 233

[Report No. 106–211]

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1218) to amend title 18,

United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines in

circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion

decisions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 1999

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1218) to

amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking

minors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1218) to

4 amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking mi5 nors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring
2

HRES 233 RH

1 the involvement of parents in abortion decisions. The bill

2 shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous

3 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final

4 passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours

5 of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman

6 and ranking minority member of the Committee on the

7 Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 79

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 233

[Report No. 106–211]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R.

parents in abortion decisions.cumvention of laws requiring the involvement ofprohibit taking minors across State lines in cir1218) to amend title 18, United States Code, to

JUNE 29, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# C_2006224EN.01003102.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/31

---

Action brought on 4 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-339/06)

(2006/C 224/59)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/116/EC (1) of 23 December 2004 amending the Annex to Council Directive 82/471/EEC as regards the inclusion of Candida guilliermondii or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/116/EC (1) of 23 December 2004 amending the Annex to Council Directive 82/471/EEC as regards the inclusion of Candida guilliermondii or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive;

1

Candida guilliermondii

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the directive expired on 30 June 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 379, 24.12.2004, p. 81.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, David Guthrie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. for
the period ending December 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2006
/s/David Guthrie
David Guthrie, President (Principal Executive Officer)
### §9019. General Counsel

(a) There is a General Counsel of the Department of the Air Force, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(b) The General Counsel shall perform such functions as the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §521(a)(5), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1059, §8019; amended Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VII, §703(a), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 1996; renumbered §9019, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(c), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8019 of this title as this section.

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–456 inserted ", by and with the advice and consent of the Senate" before period at end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–456 applicable to appointments made under this section on and after Sept. 29, 1988, see section 703(c) of Pub. L. 100–456, set out as a note under section 7019 of this title.
#### Joseph D. Hart, Respondent, *v.*Jacob Cram, Appellant.

First Department,

February 21, 1908.

Practice —judgment by default opened.

Defendant’s default in an action to recover for legal services rendered, opened ■with leave to plead, upon payment of costs imposed under a former order and disbursements on entering judgment, with ten dollars costs of motion, the judgment to stand as security for any recovery by the plaintiff.

Appeal by the defendant, Jacob Cram, from an order of the. Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of Hovember, 1907, denying the defendant’s motion to vacate an order which denied his motion to set aside a judgment entered against him by default, unless he paid fifteen dollars costs before notice of trial and ten dollars costs of motion within five days, and for leave to renew said motion and to open his default and to vacate the judgment.

*Sidney Harris*[ *William S. Woodhull*with him on the brief], for the appellant.

*David*Tim, for the respondent.

Laughlin, J.:

The plaintiff is an attorney and counselor, and he brought this action to recover $20,000 for legal services alleged to have been performed for the defendant. The defendant failed to appear and judgment was taken against him by default on the 15th day of January, 1904, for the sum of $20,000 damages and $89.85 costs, The moving papers tend to show that the defendant was unable to comply with the conditions of a prior order opening the default, and' of the order which he seeks to vacate. He does not show proper diligence in making the motion, but he does show' that he was not indebted to the plaintiff for legal services, and that there was no ground for the recovery of the judgment. His affidavit in this respect is not met by the plaintiff,' who, instead of showing justification for this' large judgment against his client,, otherwise than by alleged admissions of the latter, indulges in improper state-*488merits. refiectirig seriously on the moráis of his client, apparently upon the theory'of contradicting his affidavit, that he was without means to pay the expenses incident to opening the default. The immorality of the defendant is no justification for holding an unconscionable, judgment against him.

It follows that-the order should be reversed, hut without costs or disbursements,- and motion to vacate order and for leave to renew motion granted and default opened and leave granted defendant to plead within, ten days upon payment of twenty-five dollars costs imposed under the former order, the disbursements on entering the judgment and ten dollars costs of the motion, the judgment; to stand as security for any recovery herein by plaintiff.

Patterson, . P. J., Ingraham, Clarke and Houghton, JJ., concurred. '.

Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted on the terms stated in opinion. Settle order on notice.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 10, 2009 

0603 

Order 

 

June 10, 2009 

138335 

DEBORAH BECKER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138335 

 COA: 281481 

Clinton CC: 06-010053-NO 

PATRICIA GLAISTER, TROY BRAMAN, 

and BRAMAN CONSTRUCTION, INC., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., and CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.