alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 226.33 Line drilling.

Lessee shall not drill within 300 feet of boundary line of leased lands, nor locate any well or tank within 200 feet of any public highway, any established watering place, or any building used as a dwelling, granary, or barn, except with the written permission of the Superintendent. Failure to obtain advance written permission from the Superintendent shall subject lessee to cancellation of his/her lease and/or plugging of the well.
§ 247.15 May I reserve a campsite or drying shed? No. You may not reserve a campsite, drying shed, or other facility. ( a ) You must use campsites, drying sheds, and other facilities on a first-come, first-served basis.
( b ) You may not occupy one or more campsites solely for the purpose of reserving a site for another tribal member.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, February 24, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or (515) 564-6638.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be held Monday, February 24, 2011, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or (515) 564-6638 or write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Stop 5115, Des Moines, IA 50309 or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: January 6, 2011.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-413 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 179.2 What definitions do I need to know?

*Agency* means the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) agency office, or any other designated office in BIA, having jurisdiction over trust or restricted property. This term also means any office of a tribe that has entered into a contract or compact to fulfill applicable BIA functions.

*AIPRA* means the American Indian Probate Reform Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-374, as codified at 25 U.S.C. 2201 *et seq.*

*BIA* means the Bureau of Indian Affairs within the Department of Interior.

*Contract bonus* means cash consideration paid or agreed to be paid as incentive for execution of a contract.

*Income* means the rents and profits of real property and the interest on invested principal.

*Life estate* means an interest in property held for only the duration of a designated person's life. A life estate may be created by a conveyance document or by operation of law.

*Life estate without regard to waste* means that the holder of the life estate interest in land is entitled to the receipt of all income, including bonuses and royalties, from such land to the exclusion of the remaindermen.

*Principal* means the corpus and capital of an estate, including any payment received for the sale or diminishment of the corpus, as opposed to the income.

*Rents and profits* means the income or profit arising from the ownership or possession of property.

*Restricted property* means real property, the title to which is held by an Indian but which cannot be alienated or encumbered without the Secretary's consent. For the purpose of probate proceedings, restricted property is treated as if it were trust property.

Except as the law may provide otherwise, the term “restricted property” as used in this part does not include the restricted lands of the Five Civilized Tribes of Oklahoma or the Osage Nation.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of the Interior or authorized representative.

*Trust property* means real property, or an interest therein, the title to which is held in trust by the United States for the benefit of an individual Indian or tribe.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 



### Haaehbla J,W,Lyon,Jr, OountyAttornop 

### &lo800 County Ililrsrton,

%wJ3S DearBiro

**O.** 13-u of t&la dapmtmwnt holtls **that** on **the** county attornoy can r#aslvc for hir in W.inqurnt tax matl;ers are the ied 8rt oot in Artlelo7338, Vernon~r Annotated **Tsxam Civil**  **Btatutu.** We onelose hemwith a eQpy Of said OpiniOlb

**W4 amwr4r**  **your qu48tioPr**  **ea** follarrHonorable J. IV.Lyon, Jr., Question NO. 1. iulll the munty attorney is wuch~ l irvioer. PGE;# 2 No fast3

**are** provided by 

### law **not** 4ntiti4a to any fess for

w AT'fORNEY

GENERAL &l. J. FRllntae AssYUteat I
§ 293.26 May a compact or amendment include provisions addressing statewide remote wagering or internet gaming? Yes. A compact or amendment consistent with §§ 293.16 and 293.22 may include provisions addressing statewide remote wagering or internet gaming that is directly related to the operation of gaming activity on Indian lands. A compact or compact amendment may not, however, alter otherwise applicable Federal law. A compact may specifically include, for regulatory purposes, provisions allocating State and Tribal jurisdiction within the State over remote wagering or internet gaming originating outside Indian lands where: ( a ) State law and the compact or amendment deem the gaming to take place, for the purposes of State and Tribal law, on the Tribe's Indian lands where the server accepting the wagers is located;
( b ) The Tribe regulates the gaming; and
( c ) The player initiating the wager is not located on another Tribe's Indian lands within the State, unless that Tribe has lawfully consented.
# C_2006158EN.01S00301.xml

| 7.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 7 Juli 2006, in Official Journal of the European Union C 158 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Fourth supplement to the 24th complete edition’ and the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Fifth supplement to the 24th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/..........). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/sales_agents_en.html).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L,C,CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu.

Image

---
§ 170.412 How is the Tribal TTP long-range transportation plan developed and approved? ( a ) The Tribal TTP long-range transportation plan is developed by either: ( 1 ) A Tribe working through a self-determination contract, self-governance agreement, Program Agreement; and other appropriate agreement; or
( 2 ) BIA or FHWA upon request of, and in consultation with, a Tribe. The Tribe and BIA or FHWA need to agree on the methodology and elements included in development of the TTP long-range transportation plan along with time frames before work begins. The development of a long-range transportation plan on behalf of a Tribe will be funded from the Tribe's share of the TTP funds.
( b ) During the development of the TTP long-range transportation plan, the Tribe and BIA or FHWA will jointly conduct a midpoint review.
( c ) The public reviews a draft TTP long-range transportation plan as required by § 170.413. The plan is further refined to address any issues identified during the public review process. The Tribe then approves the TTP long-range transportation plan.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOperational Assessment of Apollo Lunar Surface Extravehicular ActivityQuantifying the operational variability of extravehicular activity (EVA) execution is critical to help design and build future support systems to enable astronauts to monitor and manage operations in deep-space, where ground support operators will no longer be able to react instantly and manage execution deviations due to the significant communication latency. This study quantifies the operational variability exhibited during Apollo 14-17 lunar surface EVA operations to better understand the challenges and natural tendencies of timeline execution and life support system performance involved in surface operations. Each EVA (11 in total) is individually summarized as well as aggregated to provide descriptive trends exhibited throughout the Apollo missions. This work extends previous EVA task analyses by calculating deviations between planned and as-performed timelines as well as examining metabolic rate and consumables usage throughout the execution of each EVA. The intent of this work is to convey the natural variability of EVA operations and to provide operational context for coping with the variability inherent to EVA execution as a means to support future concepts of operations.Document ID20170007261Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsMiller, Matthew James*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Claybrook, Austin*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Greenlund, Suraj*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Marquez, Jessica J.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Feigh, Karen M.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 3, 2017Publication DateJanuary 7, 2017Subject CategoryMan/System Technology And Life SupportStatistics And ProbabilityReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN39193NASA/TP-2017-219457Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 811073.02.38.01.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordsplanning and schedulingmetabolic expenditureApollo extravehicular activitiesAvailable DownloadsNameType20170007261.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(November 9, 2006)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronnie Cassano, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 395]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), entered on or about May 31, 2002, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In 1996, defendant was convicted of attempted kidnapping in the second degree. The order on appeal adjudicated him a sex offender pursuant to Correction Law § 168-a (2) (a) (i), which includes within the category of “sex offenses” certain abduction-related crimes committed against children by persons other than their parents. Defendant, who had requested the hearing court to adjudicate him a level two offender, presently argues that he should not have been adjudicated a sex offender at any level. He argues that the statute is unconstitutional as applied to him, because there is no evidence that his crime had a sexual aspect or motive, so that requiring him to register as a sex offender does not serve the interests underlying SORA. This claim is improperly raised for the first time on appeal (CPLR 4017, 5501 [a] [3]; *see also*Correction Law § 168-n [3] [SORA appeals governed by applicable CPLR provisions]), and we decline to reach it. In any event, were we to reach this claim, we would find that the statute is, at the very least, constitutional as applied to defendant, who has a prior felony conviction involving *240sex crimes against two children, who has a diagnosed personality disorder, and whose attempted kidnapping of a child was committed under circumstances that did not negate a possible sexual motive. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Mazzarelli, Saxe and McGuire, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50726 Summary Calendar MARTIN MORENO RUIZ Plaintiff-Appellant

v. PATRICIO MARTINEZ, Chihuahua State Governor’s Office of the General Justice of the State previous office of the Ministerial Public; JOSE REYES BAEZA, Chihuahua State Governor’s Office of the General Justice of the State previous Office ofthe Ministerial Public; POLICE DEPARTMENT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF JUSTICE OF THE STATES OF CHIHUAHUA; PATRICIA GONZALEZ RODRIGUEZ, Sub-Attorney General of Justice of the State of Chihuahua; NORMA DOMINGUEZ RIVERA, Supervisors of the Ministerial Public Police Department; ET AL Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CV-78
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Martin Moreno Ruiz, alien detainee # A28-486-148, appeals the district court’s dismissal ofhis complaint against various elected officials and employees of the City of Juarez and the State of Chihuahua, Mexico. Aside from United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 11, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50726

2 conclusional allegations that his complaint was filed under the Alien Tort Claims Act, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations Charter, and Article VI of the United States Constitution, Ruiz does not address the district court’s determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his claims and personal jurisdiction over the defendants. Ruiz’s attempt to incorporate by reference the arguments set f orth in his notice of appeal is an insufficient means ofraising those arguments in this court. SeeYohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Therefore, Ruiz has abandoned any challenge to the district court’s dismissal of his complaint by failing to raise the issues in his brief. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy SheriffAbner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED . Ruiz’s motions for a temporary restraining order (stay of deportation), a transfer or relocation to another facility, a picture of the district court judge, and newspaper reports concerning the appellants are DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FRANCIS J. BOYD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 93 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26 th day of February , 2024, the “Application for Extraordinary

Relief under 42 Pa.C.S. § 726 or Mandamus in the Alternate [sic]” is DENIED.
# OHSS | Office of Homeland Security Statistics

# Lawful Permanent Residents Annual Flow Report

The Office of Homeland Security Statistics (OHSS) Annual Flow Reports on LPRs contain information obtained from foreign nationals’ applications for LPR status on the number and characteristics of persons who became LPRs during a given fiscal year. Below are the annual flow reports on Lawful Permanent Residents.

## Download Data

**Data Category:**

**Report Year:**

**Keyword:**

-  Apply Filters 
-  Reset Filters
### The Copper Harbor Conglomerate (middle Keweenawan) on Isle Royale, Michigan, and its regional implications

By: R.G. WolffN. K. Huber

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp754B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John E. Hamilton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  May 12, 2006

 

 

| By:    | /s/ John E. Hamilton    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | John E. Hamilton        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

1
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78908-78909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32505]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, January 11, 2012; 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee 37830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melyssa P. Noe, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, 
Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 241-3315; Fax (865) 576-0956 or email: 
noemp@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at: www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The main meeting presentation will be on the 
Asset Revitalization and Reuse. The speaker will be Brian Henry, DOE 
Oak Ridge.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or 
special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact Melyssa P. Noe at least seven days in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Melyssa P. Noe at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable

[[Page 78909]]

provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comments will be provided a maximum 
of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Melyssa P. 
Noe at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also be 
available at the following Web site: http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on December 14, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-32505 Filed 12-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```