Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Notices 9745 

For more information, call Yvette 

Springer at (202) 482–2813. 

Dated: February 16, 2011. 

Yvette Springer, 

Committee Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3914 Filed 2–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–837] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 16, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film (PET 

Film) from Taiwan. See Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 49902 (August 16, 2010) 

(Preliminary Results). The review was 

requested by DuPont Teijin Films, 

Mitsubishi Polyester Film of America, 

SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics (America), 

Inc. (collectively, Petitioners). This 

review covers the following producers/ 

exporters of the subject merchandise: 

Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, Ltd. (Nan 

Ya), and Shinkong Synthetic Fibers 

Corporation (SSFC) and Shinkong 

Materials Technology Co., Ltd. (SMTC) 

(collectively, Shinkong). The period of 

review (POR) is July 1, 2008, through 

June 30, 2009. Based on the results of 

our analysis of the comments received, 

we have made changes to the 

preliminary results, which are discussed 

in the ‘‘Changes Since the Preliminary 

Results’’ section, below. For the final 

dumping margins, see the ‘‘Final Results 

of Review’’ section, below. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 22, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gene Calvert or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 428–3586 or (202) 428– 

1396, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 16, 2010, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

Preliminary Results. In the Preliminary 

Results, the Department preliminarily 

determined that, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.401(f), SSFC and SMTC should be 

treated as a single entity for purposes of 

calculating an antidumping margin. The 

Department also found that despite the 

passing of a single family member, Nan 

Ya was still affiliated with three U.S. 

customers through a family grouping. 

Subsequent to the publication of the 

Preliminary Results, these affiliated U.S. 

customers submitted revised sales 

datasets, as requested by the 

Department, to correct information 

regarding their reported product 

matching information, and to correct 

problems preventing the accurate 

consolidation of their sales data with 

Nan Ya’s datasets. As a result, Nan Ya’s 

margin has changed for these final 

results. 

On December 10, 2010, the 

Department extended the deadline for 

issuing the final results until no later 

than February 14, 2011. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, 

and Strip From Taiwan: Extension of 

Time Limit for Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 76954 (December 10, 

2010). 

On December 22, 2010, the 

Department determined that amorphous 

polyethylene terephthalate (APET) film 

products that are not biaxially-oriented, 

such as the APET products produced by 

Nan Ya, are not covered by the scope of 

the antidumping order on PET Film 

from Taiwan. See Memorandum from 

Barbara E. Tillman, Director, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, to Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, ‘‘Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from Taiwan: Final Scope Ruling on 

Amorphous Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film,’’ December 22, 2010 (Scope 

Memorandum). The Department 

reached this conclusion after analyzing 

findings of the U.S. International Trade 

Commission regarding the delimiting 

nature of biaxial-orientation as a 

product characteristic of subject PET 

Film, as well as the Department’s 

previous determination that biaxiallyoriented APET is not within the scope 

of the antidumping duty (AD) order on 

PET Film from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC), for which the scope is 

essentially identical to the scope in the 

subject case, except for language 

excluding Roller transport cleaning film, 

and tracing and drafting film from the 

PRC AD order. See Memorandum to 

John M. Andersen, ‘‘Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Scope Ruling on Amorphous 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Sheet, 

Glycol-modified Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Sheet, and Co-extruded 

Amorphous Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Sheet with Glycol-modified 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Sheets on 

the Outer Surfaces,’’ January 7, 2010. As 

we noted in the Scope Memorandum, 

the exclusionary language referenced 

above was not relevant to the scope 

ruling with respect to the instant 

proceeding. Both Nan Ya and Shinkong 

informed the Department that they did 

not report sales of any merchandise 

within the scope ruling. Thus, no 

adjustments were needed to the 

Preliminary Results as a result of the 

scope ruling for either company. 

The Department noted in the 

Preliminary Results that additional 

supplemental questions regarding 

quarterly cost information had been 

issued to both Nan Ya and Shinkong to 

determine whether it was appropriate to 

use shorter cost averaging periods in 

calculating cost of production and 

constructed value. After reviewing 

responses to these questionnaires, on 

December 23, 2010, the Department 

issued post-preliminary results of 

review and determined that the use of 

an alternative cost averaging 

methodology (i.e., quarterly cost) was 

not warranted. Thus, the postpreliminary results of review resulted in 

no changes to either respondent’s AD 

margin. See Memorandum from Mark 

Hoadley, Program Manager, Office 6, to 

Christian Marsh, Acting Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, ‘‘2008–2009 

Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on 

Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film 

from Taiwan: Post-Preliminary Analysis 

and Calculation Memorandum for Nan 

Ya Plastics Corporation, Ltd. (Nan Ya) 

and Shinkong Synthetic Fibers 

Corporation (Shinkong)’’ (PostPreliminary Analysis Memorandum), 

December 23, 2010. 

With the release of the PostPreliminary Analysis Memorandum, the 

Department notified interested parties 

that they were to file their case briefs 

with the Department by January 7, 2011, 

and rebuttal briefs were to be filed by 

January 13, 2011, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.309(d)(1). See Memorandum 

from Gene Calvert, International Trade 

Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6 to All Interested 

Parties, ‘‘Deadlines for the Submission 

of Case Briefs and Rebuttal Briefs for the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

9746 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Notices 

Final Results in the Administrative 

Review,’’ December 27, 2010. The 

Department received a timely case brief 

on January 7, 2011 from Petitioners 

raising certain issues with regard to 

Shinkong. Shinkong filed a rebuttal 

brief with the Department on January 

13, 2011. Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, the weighted 

average margin for Shinkong has 

changed from the calculated margin in 

the Preliminary Results. 

Period of Review 

The POR is July 1, 2008, through June 

30, 2009. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the 

antidumping order are all gauges of raw, 

pretreated, or primed polyethylene 

terephthalate film, whether extruded or 

coextruded. Excluded are metallized 

films and other finished films that have 

had at least one of their surfaces 

modified by the application of a 

performance-enhancing resinous or 

inorganic layer more than 0.00001 

inches thick. Imports of PET Film are 

currently classifiable in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under item number 

3920.62.00. HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes. The written description of the 

scope of this proceeding is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

The issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this 

administrative review are addressed in 

the Memorandum from Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from Taiwan: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results’’ 

(Decision Memorandum), dated 

concurrently with this notice, which is 

hereby adopted by this notice. A list of 

the issues addressed in the Decision 

Memorandum is appended to this 

notice. The Decision Memorandum is 

on file in the Department’s Central 

Records Unit (Room 7046 in the main 

Department of Commerce building), and 

can be accessed directly on the Internet 

at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper 

copy and electronic version of the 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we have made 

adjustments to our margin calculations 

for Shinkong. Specifically, we have 

recalculated Shinkong’s general and 

administrative (G&A) expenses, 

including certain costs associated with 

the sale of supplies, and excluding 

packing costs. We have also altered the 

manner in which we combined the G&A 

expenses of SSFC and SMTC (i.e., the 

two companies collapsed to form 

‘‘Shinkong’’). Finally, we limited 

Shinkong’s sales date to no later than 

shipment date. These adjustments are 

discussed in detail in the Decision 

Memorandum referenced above. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of our review, we 

determine that the following weightedaverage margins exist for the period of 

July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009: 

Manufacturer/exporter 

WeightedAverage 

Margin 

(percent) 

Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, 

Ltd. .......................................... 20.76 

Shinkong Synthetic Fibers Corporation and Shinkong Materials Technology Co., Ltd. ....... 6.38 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries. We will 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries of 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by Nan Ya and Shinkong. For 

assessment purposes, where the 

respondents reported the entered value 

for their sales, we calculated importerspecific (or customer-specific) ad 

valorem assessment rates based on the 

ratio of the total amount of the dumping 

duties calculated for the examined sales 

to the total entered value of those same 

sales. See 19 CFR 351.212(b). However, 

where the respondents did not report 

the entered value for their sales, we will 

calculate importer-specific (or customerspecific) per unit duty assessment rates. 

The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of these final results of 

review. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This 

clarification will apply to entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by the companies included in 

these final results of review for which 

the reviewed companies did not know 

their merchandise was destined for the 

United States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate non-reviewed 

entries at the all-others rate of 2.40 

percent from the investigation if there is 

no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. See Notice of Amended 

Final Antidumping Duty Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

(PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR 44174 

(July 1, 2002) (Investigation Final 

Determination). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

final results of this administrative 

review for all shipments of subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date of these final 

results, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

companies covered by this review, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rates listed 

above; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a previous 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

most recent final results in which that 

producer or exporter participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review or in any previous segment of 

this proceeding, but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be that established 

for the producer of the merchandise in 

these final results of review or in the 

most recent final results in which that 

producer participated; and, (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the producer is a firm 

covered in this review or in any 

previous segment of this proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will be 2.40 percent, 

the all-others rate established in the less 

than fair value investigation. See 

Investigation Final Determination. 

These deposit requirements shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred, and in the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Notices 9747 

1See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 75 FR 

72794 (November 26, 2010) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

2See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 72800. 

3See Memorandum to All Interested Parties 

regarding, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ dated December 9, 

2010. 

4A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-ofdrawers in two or more sections (or appearing to be 

in two or more sections), with one or two sections 

mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a slightly 

larger chest; also known as a tallboy. 

5A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers 

usually composed of a base and a top section with 

drawers, and supported on four legs or a small chest 

(often 15 inches or more in height). 

6A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, 

not more than four feet high, normally set on short 

legs. 

7A chest of drawers is typically a case containing 

drawers for storing clothing. 

8A chest is typically a case piece taller than it 

is wide featuring a series of drawers and with or 

without one or more doors for storing clothing. The 

piece can either include drawers or be designed as 

a large box incorporating a lid. 

9A door chest is typically a chest with hinged 

doors to store clothing, whether or not containing 

drawers. The piece may also include shelves for 

televisions and other entertainment electronics. 

10A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest 

of drawers normally used for storing undergarments 

and lingerie, often with mirror(s) attached. 

11A hutch is typically an open case of furniture 

with shelves that typically sits on another piece of 

furniture and provides storage for clothes. 

12An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or 

wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, 

and with one or more drawers (either exterior below 

or above the doors or interior behind the doors), 

shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for 

storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used 

to hold television receivers and/or other audiovisual entertainment systems. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice is the only reminder to 

parties subject to the administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 14, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I—Issues in Decision 

Memorandum Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

From Taiwan Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review for the Period: 07/01/2008–06/ 

30/2009 

Comment 1: Shinkong’s Cost Data do 

not Account for the Physical 

Characteristics of the Subject 

Merchandise 

Comment 2: Shinkong Understates its 

Adjustment for General and 

Administrative Expenses 

Comment 3: The Date of Sale for 

Shinkong’s U.S. Sales 

[FR Doc. 2011–3892 Filed 2–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 22, 

2011. 

SUMMARY: On November 26, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the 

preliminary results of the new shipper 

reviews of the antidumping duty order 

on wooden bedroom furniture (‘‘WBF’’) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) covering sales of subject 

merchandise made by Dongguan 

Huansheng Furniture Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Huansheng’’); Hangzhou Cadman 

Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Cadman’’); and 

Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Wanvog’’).1 In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(ii), we gave interested parties 

an opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. Based on our 

analysis of the comments received, the 

Department has made changes to the 

Preliminary Results. The final dumping 

margins are listed below in the section 

entitled ‘‘Final Results of the New 

Shipper Reviews.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Pandolph or Jeffrey Pedersen, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3627 and (202) 

482–2769, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We 

published the Preliminary Results for 

these new shipper reviews on November 

26, 2010. In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department stated that interested parties 

were to submit case briefs within 30 

days of publication of the Preliminary 

Results and rebuttal briefs within five 

days after the due date for filing case 

briefs.2 On December 9, 2010, the 

Department extended the deadlines for 

the case briefs and rebuttal briefs until 

January 3, 2011 and January 10, 2011, 

respectively.3 On January 3, 2011, the 

Department received case briefs from 

Huansheng and Wanvog. On January 10, 

2011, the Department received a letter 

in lieu of a rebuttal brief from Cadman. 

Period of Review 

The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is 

January 1, 2009, through December 31, 

2009. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the order is 

WBF. WBF is generally, but not 

exclusively, designed, manufactured, 

and offered for sale in coordinated 

groups, or bedrooms, in which all of the 

individual pieces are of approximately 

the same style and approximately the 

same material and/or finish. The subject 

merchandise is made substantially of 

wood products, including both solid 

wood and also engineered wood 

products made from wood particles, 

fibers, or other wooden materials such 

as plywood, strand board, particle 

board, and fiberboard, with or without 

wood veneers, wood overlays, or 

laminates, with or without non-wood 

components or trim such as metal, 

marble, leather, glass, plastic, or other 

resins, and whether or not assembled, 

completed, or finished. 

The subject merchandise includes the 

following items: (1) Wooden beds such 

as loft beds, bunk beds, and other beds; 

(2) wooden headboards for beds 

(whether stand-alone or attached to side 

rails), wooden footboards for beds, 

wooden side rails for beds, and wooden 

canopies for beds; (3) night tables, night 

stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, 

mule chests, gentlemen’s chests, 

bachelor’s chests, lingerie chests, 

wardrobes, vanities, chessers, 

chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; 

(4) dressers with framed glass mirrors 

that are attached to, incorporated in, sit 

on, or hang over the dresser; (5) chestson-chests,4 highboys,5 lowboys,6 chests 

of drawers,7 chests,8 door chests,9

chiffoniers,10 hutches,11 and armoires;12

(6) desks, computer stands, filing 

cabinets, bookcases, or writing tables 

that are attached to or incorporated in 

the subject merchandise; and (7) other 

bedroom furniture consistent with the 

above list. 

The scope of the order excludes the 

following items: (1) Seats, chairs, 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES