alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8162. Aviation commands: eligibility

(a)(1) To be eligible to command an aircraft carrier or an aircraft tender, an officer must be an officer in the line of the Navy who is designated as a naval aviator or naval flight officer and who is otherwise qualified.

(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to command of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that has been inactivated for the purpose of permanent decommissioning and disposal.

(b) To be eligible to command a naval aviation school, a naval air station, or a naval aviation unit organized for flight tactical purposes, an officer must be an officer in the line of the Navy designated as a naval aviator or naval flight officer.

(c) To be eligible to command a Marine Corps aviation school, a Marine Corps air station, or a Marine Corps aviation unit organized for flight tactical purposes, an officer must be an officer of the Marine Corps designated as a naval aviator or naval flight officer.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 371, §5942; Pub. L. 91–198, §1(1), Feb. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 15; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title V, §507, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3357; renumbered §8162, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5942(a) | 34 U.S.C. 735 (5th par.). | June 24, 1926, ch. 668, §3 (5th par.), 44 Stat. 767. |
| 5942(b) | 34 U.S.C. 735 (4th par.). | June 24, 1926, ch. 668, §3 (4th par.), 44 Stat. 767. |
| 5942(c) | 34 U.S.C. 735 (7th par.). | June 24, 1926, ch. 668, §3 (7th par.), 44 Stat. 767. |

The last proviso of §8 of the Act of July 12, 1921, ch. 44 (34 U.S.C. 734), was superseded by paragraphs 4, 5, and 7 of §3 of the Act of June 24, 1926, ch. 668 (34 U.S.C. 735), insofar as ships and activities mentioned in those paragraphs are concerned. The requirements of this section are stated as conditions of eligibility for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5942 of this title as this section.

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–291 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

1970—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–198 substituted "naval flight officer" for "naval aviation observer".

Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 91–198 inserted "or naval flight officer" after "naval aviator".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-741]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7719]

Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of the Advisory Committee charter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Renewal of Advisory Committee: The Secretary of State announces the 
renewal of the charter of the Advisory Committee on International 
Postal and Delivery Services in fulfillment of the provisions of the 
2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 109-435) and in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Purpose: The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to serve the 
Department of State in an advisory capacity with respect to the 
formulation, coordination, and oversight of foreign policy related to 
international postal services and other international delivery 
services. The Committee provides a forum for government employees, 
representatives of the industry sector and members of the public to 
present their advice and views directly to the Department of State.
    For further information, please contact Dennis Delehanty, Office of 
Global Systems (IO/GS), Bureau of International Organization Affairs, 
U.S. Department of State, at (202) 647-4197.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Dennis M. Delehanty,
Foreign Affairs Officer, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-741 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith B. Larwood, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 748]

Appeal from an order of the Wayne County Court (Dennis M. Kehoe, J), dated May 24, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 *et seq.).*Defendant was afforded the opportunity to controvert the evidence upon which the People relied, and the court’s upward departure from the presumptive risk level is supported by the requisite clear and convincing evidence (see § 168-d [3]; *People v Kwiatkowski,*24 AD 3d 878, 879 [2005]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.EJ.,Gorski, Smith and Centra, JJ.
Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company
1150 South Olive Street
Los Angeles, CA  90015

Telephone:  213-742-3129
Fax:        213-741-6623





September 8, 2006



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

  Re: Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and
      Transamerica Occidental Life Separate Account VL (File No. 33-2022)

Dear Commissioner:

On behalf of Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and Transamerica
Occidental Life Separate Account VL ("separate account"), incorporated by
reference is the annual report for the underlying fund, the EQ Advisers Trust,
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Rule 30b2-1
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Act").

         Filer/Entity:              EQ Advisers Trust
         File #:                    811-07953
         CIK #:                     0001027263
         Accession #:               0001193125-06-185757
         Date of Filing:            9-06-06

This annual report is for the period ending June 30, 2006, and has been
transmitted to contract holders in accordance with Rule 30d-2 under the Act.


Very truly yours,



David M. Goldstein
Senior Vice President
### [§2511. Renumbered §4831]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2511, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §823(a)(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1600; amended Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §824(b), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1438, defined "manufacturing technology", "manufacturing extension program", and "United States-based small manufacturing firm" for purposes of former chapter 149 of this title, prior to repeal and restatement in section 2491 (now 4801) of this title by Pub. L. 102–484, §§4202(a), 4203(a).

Another prior section 2511 was renumbered section 2540 of this title and subsequently repealed.
[No. 5976.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of Henry L. Doherty for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Former Opinion Followed.

This proceeding dismissed in accordance with the opinion in In re Stidger, ante, p. 407.

*Original Proceeding.*

Application by Henry L. Doherty for a writ of *habeas corpus.*Writ denied.

Decision *en banc.*

*Dismissed.*

Mr. Justice Goddard and Mr. Justice Bailey dissenting.

Mr. J. F. Vaile, Mr. W. V. Elliott and Mi\ E. J. Bardwell, for petitioners.

*Per Curiam.*

For reasons assigned in No. 5887, “In the Matter of the Application of George Stidger *423for a Writ of *Habeas Corpus,”*lianded down this date, this proceeding will he dismissed.

Decision *en banc. Dismissed.*

Mr. Justice Goddard and Mr. Justice Bailey dissent. _
#### MORROW v. MORROW

No. 40P90

Case below: 94 N.C.App. 187

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 March 1990.
### [§2249c. Renumbered §345]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1606
Neoglacial ii id glacial positions since the culminati f the Little Ice Age—PLATE 2

US. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY oo =r Fconnor LE. Hardison, J, ihend Costa JE. 201, Debris flows rom false of neoglacial-age
joraine dams in the Three Sisters and Mount Jefferson Wilderness areas, Oregon

EZ
«
science for a changing world

121°52'

-_

pri
fe

50!

sv 49" 121°46' 121°51"
I T T V 45°12" 44°07°30"
NL £8 IPA) \; LS Pax
fe) icott
EXPLANATION \ prin}
a Moraine deposits—Little Ice Age and S ew
earlier Neoglacial moraines
x Ly Debris flow deposits—From major e fn
moraine-dam failures and lake releases 3
| | Lake extent at time of breach in 1942 or
<< Moraine crest TS
e
Glacier time of bi h
—

ig | op

EXPLANATION - Teardrop

s Pool
Ea Moraine deposits—Little Ice Age and ‘ \
earlier Neoglacial moraines i rs

a
= FZ al Debris flow deposits—From major Xt \
q moraine-dam failures and lake releases y 3
2 ° i. || Lake extent at time of breach in 1933 ( \
( oillle Ly, ——— Moraine crest 3 x (
my a
(WS NSS oO N S ( 4} —— Glacier extent at time of breach ( = g
— SS IFES ¥) — . FSIS Te As PASS ne
121°52' 51 50° 4o 121°46 50° 49 121
8

Base from US. Geological Survey
1:24,000, South Sister, Oregon, 1988

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
1:24,000, North Sister, Oregon, 198

Debris flow path for flows originating from 1933 moraine-dammed
Debris flow path for flows originating from 1942 moraine-dammed lake release near Collier Glacier, North Sister lake release near Eugene Glacier, South Sister

TNA AE ae)?

46 45° aa 43 42 av 121°40°
er"

if

> la
—~ 0
wut S
; S
id
x »,

i
is (oo
Cas,

=

Wire ey) ee Tg

,
9 > EXPLANATION RY
S | Moraine deposits—Little Ice Age and al

earlier Neoglacial moraines KS

<< Moraine crest

ESS ALS
Ze : u< WAG © & 3 . f
ETI UW PPA

OUR. Ly RH) re. me =~ :
\ \ Z y [3p Pe
7. GZ . a | A Bl 2 q
= Sp, a ( i . iS d
j ESI ie S| TEI wersine deposit 9
GY ° yy) LE , 2 x ( v/ =) ; : y 4 bet a d | a }

flow dey
moraine-dam failures and lake rel leases NS
|| Lake extent at of brea 166
ad 45 aa 121°40" —.. Moraine crest
Base from US. Geological Sur irvey ‘A ——— Glacier extent at time of breac!
000, ister and
earns Oe Jon, 1988 Extent of debris flow deposits re
approximately located

122°00"

OT ee
Scie

wy of Sno

Lo}

121900"
NEELER| WY,
{o3}
TE Lake il :
<0 | *hinook Madras:
[4 /) \ a val
: ese FERSON,
tt) aay... —.. ~
ra Hiteshinatch ®
3 lt. RY i
D1 Ne
18 2.
4 “7

r a
oa < Sf ae :

(/ : “
FS
roken J HK frend a ious vey
LANE Y A
& = SCALE 1:24.00 . athe subi 3
; & ' ; ; ——— Debris flow path for flow originating from 1966 moraine-dammed
DESCHUTES | .
EXPLANATION & 1m 30 7 Tob 00 ETERS lake release near East Bend Glacier, Broken Top
iii: sere a — ee — la

DEBRIS FLOW DEPOSITS, NEOGLACIAL-AGE MORAINES, AND GLACIER POSITIONS IN THE THREE SISTERS WILDERNESS AREA, OREGON

J.E. O'Connor, J.H. Hardison, III, and J.E. Costa
2001
# C_2006237EN.01001801.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/18

---

Action brought on 30 July 2006 — Schell v Commission

(Case F-83/06)

(2006/C 237/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Arno Schell (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the lists of officials promoted in the 2004 and 2005 promotion years, in so far as these lists do not contain the applicant's name, and also, incidentally, the preparatory actions of those decisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the lists of officials promoted in the 2004 and 2005 promotion years, in so far as these lists do not contain the applicant's name, and also, incidentally, the preparatory actions of those decisions;

| — | in the alternative, annul the allocation of promotion points in those years in so far as the applicant is concerned; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the allocation of promotion points in those years in so far as the applicant is concerned;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his application, the applicant relies on the seven following pleas in law:

| — | first, infringement of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

first, infringement of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | second, infringement of the general implementing provisions in respect of that article; |
| --- | --- |

—

second, infringement of the general implementing provisions in respect of that article;

| — | third, infringement of the principle of non-discrimination; |
| --- | --- |

—

third, infringement of the principle of non-discrimination;

| — | fourth, infringement of the Administrative Guide ‘Appraisal and Promotion of Officials’, and of successive Guides; |
| --- | --- |

—

fourth, infringement of the Administrative Guide ‘Appraisal and Promotion of Officials’, and of successive Guides;

| — | fifth, infringement of the principles of prohibition of arbitrary procedures and of abuse of powers, and also infringement of the duty to give reasons; |
| --- | --- |

—

fifth, infringement of the principles of prohibition of arbitrary procedures and of abuse of powers, and also infringement of the duty to give reasons;

| — | sixth, infringement of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations, and of the rule ‘Patere legem quam ipse fecisti’ (obey the rules which you yourself have made); |
| --- | --- |

—

sixth, infringement of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations, and of the rule ‘Patere legem quam ipse fecisti’ (obey the rules which you yourself have made);

| — | seventh, infringement of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials. |
| --- | --- |

—

seventh, infringement of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.

---
### §948c. Persons subject to military commissions

Any alien unprivileged enemy belligerent is subject to trial by military commission as set forth in this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2576.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 948c, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2602, related to persons subject to military commissions, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
§ 20.503 When can Child Assistance funds be used for Indian adoption or guardianship subsidies? You, the social services program, can use Child Assistance funds to provide either adoption or guardianship subsidies if all of the following are true: ( a ) The child is 17 or younger;
( b ) The child has been in foster care prior to approval of the subsidy;
( c ) The social services worker has considered all other available resources, attempted permanency planning, and documented in the case file that placement was in the best interest of the child; and
( d ) The Bureau Line Officer approves the subsidy before it is authorized and redetermines eligibility on a yearly basis.
Date: March 20 , 2015 Meeting: Meeting with INGAA Rule(s) Discussed:**\'J\ ~c** **'- 1\** **L** Written Materials?

### Yes**~** Name**~V'Icl** ,\**~n-k**

### Tk~~e_,se._**r~** 

# 21/\A//i**~** Organization

lt-JGAA 

### IAJ(;.Af\. --t.rl(g"-®**\1'1~~/ .0** **flt** .- 

## j;::-r,n- /' " 

# f/ A-M 

# vr 

# A**~6f;JJ J~**  

# dA 

# ·**~r f\6ZE>r**  PtL\N 

# U\ tP A

! I Phone Number 

# l
I I Qot..) 'Zib· <;"'100 "2/J 

### -z 2..{**~-** 

### 5Cf5 $" 1-u

- L-

- J 

## fJ · Y 7? L '-.) 

### 201**~** 

### 3L{ 

### 3 

## _c !cf:t(o 

## d- 0 1

-**3~) C[0~/1** 


## I



# l

# ~

-
### §8164. Marine Corps officers: limitation on power to command

Officers of the Marine Corps may not command vessels or naval shipyards.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 371, §5944; renumbered §8164, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5944 | 34 U.S.C. 713. | R.S. 1617. |

The words "of the United States" are omitted as surplusage. The word "command" is substituted for the words "exercise command over any".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5944 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 248.4 Applicability of laws and regulations.

No Indian shall use any of the sites for any activity that is contrary to the provisions of any applicable law or regulation of his tribe or contrary to any applicable State or Federal law or regulation. The Regional Director may in his discretion suspend or withdraw privileges for future access to or use of the sites for violation of such laws and regulations: *Provided,* That, nothing contained in the regulations in this part is intended or shall be construed as limiting or affecting any treaty rights of any tribe nor as subjecting any Indian properly exercising tribal treaty rights to State fishing laws or regulations which are not compatible with such rights.

[32 FR 3945, Mar. 10, 1967, as amended at 85 FR 73193, Nov. 17, 2020]
Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Update

As of March 31, 2023

JTF-RH is currently ON PLAN to safely gravity defuel by June 2024.

Working in partnership with the DOH and EPA, we are seeking to optimize the schedule to start defueling earlier.

DoD Repairs Completed

220/253

Start Complete

Number of Validated Repairs 

Submitted to DOH for Review/Approval

Next 90 Days May 2023 June 2023 July 2023

June 5: DOH Open House 

June 6: FTAC1 – Hosted by DOH

June 8: Response Drill

June 9: NEPA

1 Public Comment Period Begins 

June 15: NEPA Public Meeting

June 30: NEPA Public Comment Period Ends

July 1-31: Fire Watch Training

July 13: Response Drill

July 26: DISF

1 Fifth Meeting

3

rd Party Quality Validation Completed 

120/253

Start Complete

Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Dashboard

As of May 15, 2023

Subject to Revision

Dashboard Legend 1

DISF: Defueling Information Sharing Forum

FTAC: Fuel Tank Advisory Committee

NEPA: National Environmental Policy Act

Defueling Open House

Ke’ehi Lagoon 

Memorial Park, 4 to 7p.m. 

Click on the photo for an 

enlarged PDF version.

The Process of Defueling

JTF-RH is focused on completing repairs, quality 

control tasks, training, response preparation, 

regulatory approvals and operational planning for all 

major milestones. This work will help ensure the 

safe and expeditious defueling of Red Hill. To learn 

more about this process, click the link here. 

Start Complete

Key Events

120/253

May 16: HI House Special Committee for

Red Hill Information Hearing

May 17: DISF1 Fourth Meeting

May 23-24: Defueling Open House

May 31: Projected DoD Repairs Complete

DOH Conditional Approval

Start Complete

56/253
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 565 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 268
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 565

                          [Report No. 106-797]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4516) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for 
   the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4516) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for 
   the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4516) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

                                                 House Calendar No. 268

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 565

                          [Report No. 106-797]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4516) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for 
   the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 27, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
# C_2006242EN.01001102.xml

| 7.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4326 — BC Partners/Brenntag)

(2006/C 242/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 August 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4326. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4326. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---