alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. app. I section 10(d), of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and 5 U.S.C. section 552b, the Government in the Sunshine Act, a report summarizing the closed meeting activities of the Art Advisory Panel during 2009 has been prepared. A copy of this report has been filed with the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Management.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This notice is effective                         *March 1, 2011.*

# ADDRESSES:

                        The report is available for public inspection and requests for copies should be addressed to: Internal Revenue Service, Freedom of Information Reading Room, Room 1621, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, telephone number (202) 622-5164 (not a toll free number). The report is also available at                         *http://www.irs.gov*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Bothwell, AP:TPV:ART, Internal Revenue Service/Appeals, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005, telephone (202) 435-5611 (not a toll free telephone number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

It has determined that this document is not a major rule as defined in Executive Order 12291 and that a regulatory impact analysis therefore, is not required. Neither does this document constitute a rule subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6).

Douglas Shulman,

Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

[FR Doc. 2011-4201 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### §9625. Ordnance property: officers of the armed forces; civilian employees of the Department of the Air Force; American National Red Cross; educational institutions; homes for veterans' orphans

(a) The Secretary of the Air Force may sell articles of ordnance property to officers of other armed forces for their use in the service, in the same manner as these articles are sold to officers of the Air Force or the Space Force.

(b) Under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, ordnance stores may be sold to civilian employees of the Department of the Air Force and to the American National Red Cross.

(c) Articles of ordnance property may be sold to educational institutions and to State soldiers' and sailors' orphans' homes for maintaining the ordnance and ordnance stores issued to those institutions and homes.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 580; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(e)(12)(A), (B), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3817.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9625(a) 9625(b)9625(c) | 34:540.50:70.50:71.50:63. | Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 252 (5th par. under "National Trophy and Medals for Rifle Contests"), 35 Stat. 750. |
| | | Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 252 (8th par. under "National Trophy and Medals for Rifle Contests"), 35 Stat. 751; June 28, 1950, ch. 383, §402(h), 64 Stat. 273. |
| | | May 11, 1908, ch. 163 (4th par. under "National Trophy and Medals for Rifle Contests"), 35 Stat. 125. |

9625(b)

9625(c)

50:70.

50:71.

50:63.

In subsection (a), the words "Secretary of the Air Force" are substituted for the words "Chief of Ordnance", since the functions which, for the Army, are assigned to subordinate officers of the Army, are, for the Air Force, assigned to the Secretary of the Air Force. The words "other armed forces" are substituted for the words "the Navy and Marine Corps", in 34:540 and 50:70, since those sales may be made to officers of the Coast Guard under section 114(c) of Title 14.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §923(e)(12)(B), amended section catchline generally. Prior to amendment, catchline read as follows: "Ordnance property: officers of armed forces; civilian employees of Air Force; American National Red Cross; educational institutions; homes for veterans' orphans".

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, §923(e)(12)(A)(i), inserted "or the Space Force" after "officers of the Air Force".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283, §923(e)(12)(A)(ii), substituted "the Department of the Air Force" for "the Air Force".
EPA Reg. No. 62097-12

Vol. 1 part 1
#### § 5.10 Forms of publication.

Pursuant to section 1506 of title 44, United States Code, the Administrative Committee publishes the Federal Register in paper and online on *www.govinfo.gov* (44 U.S.C. 4101).

[61 FR 68118, Dec. 27, 1996, as amended at 87 FR 80002, Dec. 29, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10352-10353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-6495-000]


Keyser, Michael J.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on February 15, 2011, Michael J. Keyser submitted 
for filing, an application for authority to hold interlocking 
positions, pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act, 16 
U.S.C. 825d(b) (2008), Part 45 of Title 18 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations, 18 CFR part 45 and 45.8 (2010), and Commission Order No. 
664, 112 FERC ] 61,298 (2005).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of

[[Page 10353]]

intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#52141700111d3c3e3b3c37012722223d202612343720317c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="40060512030f2e2c292e25133530302f323400262532236e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 8, 2011.

    Dated: February 16, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4086 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of April 1, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities
Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,
Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Midland Loan
Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee and Pentalpha Surveillance
LLC, as Trust Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates WFRBS 2012-C6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from April 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the period April 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2013.

/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50190

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BYRON KEITH MOORE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-91-CR-47-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 21, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Byron Keith Moore appeals his sentence of 21 months’

imprisonment following the revocation of his supervised release,

which was originally part of his sentence for distribution of

cocaine base. Moore argues that the sentence was plainly

unreasonable because the district court should not have

considered two of the violations alleged by the probation officer

given that Moore had already served 13 months in state prison for

the conduct described in the two violations.
No. 98-50190

-2-

We will affirm a sentence following the revocation of

supervised release unless it was in violation of law or was

plainly unreasonable. United States v. Mathena, 23 F.3d 87, 89

(5th Cir. 1994). Moore committed repeated violations of his

supervised release, and his 21-month-imprisonment sentence is

within the statutory range. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C); 18

U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3). Moore’s sentence was not plainly

unreasonable. See Mathena, 23 F.3d at 94. 

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7234

RANDY L. VALENTINE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THIERRY D. NETTLES, Major at Lieber

Correctional Institution, sued in his

individual capacity; JOHN CUSACK, Doctor at

Lieber Correctional Institution, sued in his

individual capacity; JOHN DOES, Officers, sued

in their individual capacities; JANE GARMANY,

Nurse at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, sued in

her individual capacity; ROBIN HANCOCK, Health

Counsel, sued in her individual capacity;

RICHARD FRIERSON, Doctor at Gilliam

Psychiatric Hospital, sued in his individual

capacity; BRIAN R. BLANTON, Doctor at Gilliam

Psychiatric Hospital, sued in his individual

capacity; JIM E. PAGE, Director-Hospital

Administrator at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital,

sued in his individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (4:06-cv-02314-HMH)

Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy L. Valentine, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo,

South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Valentine appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Valentine v.

Nettles, No. 4:06-cv-02314-HMH (D.S.C. July 19, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
(logo) plante 

           moran

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC

10 South Riverside Plaza

9th Floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.207.1040

Fax: 312.207.1066

plantemoran.com

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

 

 

We have examined National Tax Search, LLC (the "Company") compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth-in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31 , 2015. The Company has determined that only certain servicing criteria, 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

 

 Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

 In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

 

 Chicago, IL

January 18, 2016

 

 

(logo) Praxity 

MEMBER

GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF

INDEPENDENT FIRMS
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAcoustical and Flowfield Characterization of a Scaled Tabletop RocketAn analysis of the acoustical and flowfield environment for the scaled 1-pound-force (lbf) thrust tabletop motor was performed. This tabletop motor from NASA Stennis Space Center Is composed of Plexiglas burning In gaseous oxygen with a graphite insert for the nozzle portion. The nozzle has a throat diameter of 0.2 inch and an exit diameter of 0.38 Inch. With a chamber pressure at 55 pounds per square Inch absolute (psia), a normal shock is formed immediately downstream of the nozzle exit plane as the combustion products exhaust into the ambient at atmospheric pressure. The jet characterization Is based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in conjunction with Kirchhoff surface integral formulation and compared with correlations developed for measured rocket noise and a pressure fluctuation scaling (PFS) method. Predictions and comparisons are made for the overall sound pressure levels (OASPL's) and spectral dependence of sound pressure level (SPL). The overall objective of this effort is to develop methods for scaling the acoustic and flowfield environment of rockets with a wide range of thrust (1 lbf to 1 million lbf).Document ID20010090338Acquisition SourceKennedy Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKandula, Max*(DYNACS Engineering Co., Inc. Cocoa Beach, FL United States)*Margasahayam, Ravi*(DYNACS Engineering Co., Inc. Cocoa Beach, FL United States)*Norton, Michael*(University of Western Australia Crawley Australia)*Caimi, Raoul*(NASA Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL United States)*Steinrock, T.Venegas, AugustoDate AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 2001Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:210262NASA/TM-2001-210262Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS10-98001Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010090338.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Emmons County *vs.*R. B. Mellon.

Opinion filed November 13, 1900.

(84 N. W. Rep. 1117.)

Appeal from District Court, Emmons County; *Winchester,*J.

*George M. Register*and *Cochrane & Corliss,*for appellant.

*H. A. Armstrong*and *Stevens & Allen,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The controlling questions in this case were involved and decided in the case of *Emmons Co.*v. *Thompson*(decided this term) 9 N. D. 598, 84 N. W. Rep. 385. The order appealed from is in all things reversed, and the District Court is directed to enter an order reversing the same, and also to enter an order denying the application made herein to vacate said judgment and fax sale, with costs of both courts to appellant.
### SUBCHAPTER V—COMPOSITION OF COURTS-MARTIAL

| Sec. | Art. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 822. | 22. | Who may convene general courts-martial. |
| 823. | 23. | Who may convene special courts-martial. |
| 824. | 24. | Who may convene summary courts-martial. |
| 824a. | 24a. | Special trial counsel. |
| 825. | 25. | Who may serve on courts-martial. |
| 825a. | 25a. | Number of court-martial members in capital cases. |
| 826. | 26. | Military judge of a general or special court-martial. |
| 826a. | 26a. | Military magistrates. |
| 827. | 27. | Detail of trial counsel and defense counsel. |
| 828. | 28. | Detail or employment of reporters and interpreters. |
| 829. | 29. | Assembly and impaneling of members; detail of new members and military judges. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, §531(b), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1693, added item 824a.

2017—Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1081(d)(19)(A), (B), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1601, amended Pub. L. 114–328, §5541(2). See 2016 Amendment note below.

2016—Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LXIII, §5541(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2965, as amended by Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1081(d)(19)(A), (B), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1601, added items 825a, 826a, and 829 and struck out former items 825a "Art. 25a. Number of members in capital cases" and 829 "Art. 29. Absent and additional members".

2001—Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §582(b)(2), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1124, added item 825a.

1968—Pub. L. 90–632, §2(8), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1336, substituted "Military judge of a general or special court-martial" for "Law officer of a general court-martial" in item 826.
# C_2006184EN.01000902.xml

| 8.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4252 — Sca Forest/Jämtlamell Industri)

(2006/C 184/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4252. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4252. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---