alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby
made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2012, by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization
Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank,
National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificiate Administrator, Paying
Agent and Custodian and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2012-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section
10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during
the period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been
made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th day of March 2014.



Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

426 CA 10-02008 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

JAMES MAGUIRE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

CHELUS, HERDZIK, SPEYER & MONTE, P.C., BUFFALO (ARTHUR A. HERDZIK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BOUVIER PARTNERSHIP, LLP, BUFFALO (NORMAN E.S. GREENE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Drury, J.), entered August 4, 2010. The amended order, insofar as appealed from, granted the cross motion of plaintiff for leave to serve an amended complaint asserting a cause of action pursuant to 42 USC § 1983 and adding John/Jane Doe as a defendant.
It is hereby ORDERED that the amended order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: April 1, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
# C_2006196EN.01003501.xml

| 19.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/35

---

Corrigendum to Call for proposals — DG EAC/22/06

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 149 of 27 June 2006
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 149 of 27 June 2006

(2006/C 196/10)

On page 14, point 4 ‘Deadline’ is replaced by the following:

‘4.   Deadline

Applications must be dispatched, date as postmark, to the Commission no later than the new deadline of 8 September 2006. (Please note this revised deadline supersedes the previous deadline of 18 August 2006.)’

---
H. Res. 492

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 9, 2000.

Whereas the foundation of American freedom and democracy

is a strong, effective system of education in which every

child can learn in a safe and nurturing environment;

Whereas a first-rate education system depends on a partnership between parents, principals, teachers, and children;

Whereas much of the success of our Nation during the American Century is the result of the hard work and dedication of teachers across the land;

Whereas, in addition to their families, knowledgeable and

skillful teachers can have a profound impact on a child’s

early development and future success;

Whereas, while many people spend their lives building careers, teachers spend their careers building lives;

Whereas our Nation’s teachers serve our children beyond the

call of duty as coaches, mentors, and advisors without regard to fame or fortune; and

Whereas across this land nearly three million men and

women experience the joys of teaching young minds the

virtues of reading, writing, and arithmetic: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
2

•HRES 492 EH

(1) honors and recognizes the unique and important

achievements of America’s teachers; and

(2) urges all Americans to take a moment to thank

and pay tribute to our Nation’s teachers.

Attest:

Clerk.
H. Res. 549

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 25, 2000.

Whereas August 27, 2000, is the 10th anniversary of the initial activation of National Guard and Reserve personnel

for Operation Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm,

the operations of the United States Armed Forces conducted as a consequence of the invasion of Kuwait by

Iraq;

Whereas over 267,000 members of the National Guard and

Reserve were ordered to active duty during Operation

Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm;

Whereas 106,000 of these members served in the Southwest

Asia theater of operations, 16,000 served in a support capacity abroad outside the theater of operations, and

145,000 served in a support capacity in the United

States;

Whereas 57 members of the National Guard and Reserve lost

their lives in the service of the Nation in Operation

Desert Storm; and

Whereas the majority of these members lost their lives in a

missile attack on the United States Army barracks at

Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
2

•HRES 549 EH

(1) recognizes the historical significance of the 10th

anniversary of the initial activation of National Guard

and Reserve personnel for Operation Desert Shield and

Operation Desert Storm;

(2) honors the service and sacrifice of these citizen

soldiers and their families during Operation Desert

Shield and Operation Desert Storm;

(3) recognizes the growing importance of the National Guard and Reserve to the security of the United

States; and

(4) supports ensuring the readiness of the National

Guard and Reserve.

Attest:

Clerk.
# CA2006278EN.01000101.xml

| 16.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 278/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Lanbo
Financial Group, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Pingji Lu,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Lanbo Financial Group, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

      6. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      7. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Dated:  September 2, 2005                /s/ Pingji Lu
                                         ----------------------
                                         Pingji Lu
                                         Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                         Executive Officer
# C_2006268EN.01000101.xml

| 4.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

3,30 % on 1 November 2006

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 November 2006

(2006/C 268/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2760 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4549 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66880 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1685 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5929 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,68 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2445 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5775 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,079 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 260,37 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8638 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5225 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,62 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 36,376 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8712 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6527 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4402 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9237 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8935 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9923 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 195,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4965 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0442 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3510 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 631,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6536 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,379 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,825 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2760

JPY

Japanese yen

149,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4549

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66880

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1685

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5929

ISK

Iceland króna

86,68

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2445

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5775

CZK

Czech koruna

28,079

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

260,37

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8638

RON

Romanian leu

3,5225

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,62

SKK

Slovak koruna

36,376

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8712

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6527

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4402

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9237

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8935

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9923

KRW

South Korean won

1 195,87

ZAR

South African rand

9,4965

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0442

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3510

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 631,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6536

PHP

Philippine peso

63,379

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0900

THB

Thai baht

46,825

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**EXHIBIT 31(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Patrick D.Hanley, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Overnite Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section III.E.] 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 10, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 32.0
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Period Ended June 30, 2006
  1.
    
    The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, (the Form
10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 9, 2006
    
    /s/ Thomas S. WuThomas S. WuChairman, President andChief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2006
    
    /s/ Dennis WuDennis WuDirector, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RD ER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 12

- 00740

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 1135191

Style: Albert Lujan d/b/a Texas Wholesale Flower Company

v Navistar Financial Corporation

Date motion filed * : August 1, 2013

Type of m otion: M otion to A mend B rief

Party filing motion: A ppellant, Alber Lujan d/b/a Texas Wholesale Flowers

Document to be filed: A mended B rief

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: filed with motion

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ E velyn V

. K eyes

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: September 2 6 , 2013
# Maytech 60amp opto 400Hz

Refresh ESC

Cont.Current 60A

Burst Current(10sec) 80A

Net Weight 51g

PCB Size(mm)(L x W x H) 52.5×25.8×14.5

Lipo 2

- 6Cells

NiMh 5

- 18Cells

Main Features:

* Extremely low internal resistance.

* Super smooth and accurate throttle linearity.

* Power arming protection: Prevents the motor from accidentally running when switched ON.

* Lost Throttle signal protection:

* The ESC will automatically reduces output power to the motor when it detects a lost of throttle signal for 1 second. A

subsequent loss of throttle signal beyond 3 seconds will cause the ESC automatically to cut power to the motor.

* Safety thermal over

- load protection:

* Automatically reduce output power to half when the temperature reaches 110Degrees Celsius, restore out put power

when the temperature is below 110 Degrees Celsius.

* Governor Mode: For Helicopter application.

* With latest humanize software design, especially for all types of brushless motor.

* Parameters programmable function to meet your specific needs.
### §3746. Applicability of regulations to subcontractors

The regulations referred to in sections 3744 and 3745(a) and (b) of this title shall require prime contractors of a covered contract, to the maximum extent practicable, to apply the provisions of such regulations to all subcontractors of the covered contract.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1832(a), (e), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4218, 4221.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (g) of section 2324 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1832(e), was based on Pub. L. 99–145, title IX, §911(a)(1), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2101(a)(7), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3308.

Another section 1832(e) of Pub. L. 116–283 amended section 3745 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3746 was renumbered section 7276 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1832(e), transferred subsec. (g) of section 2324 of this title to this section, struck out subsec. (g) designation and heading "Applicability of Regulations to Subcontractors" at beginning, and substituted "sections 3744 and 3745(a) and (b) of this title" for "subsections (e) and (f)(1)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2016

s0126 

# Order

Clerk January 29, 2016

152114

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 152114

COA: 319942

Kent CC: 12

- 006969

- FC

HENRY RICHARD HARPER,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305 (H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals opinion

holding that it cannot be concluded that the two separate assaults constituted part of the

“same transaction” under MCL 750.520b(3). We agree, however, that t he sentencing

judge failed to identify specific evidence from which one could conclude that the

imposition of consecutive sentences was warranted. We therefore REMAND this case to

the Kent Circuit Court. On remand, the trial court shall either issue an o rder that provides

a basis for its conclusion that the two criminal offenses arose from the same transaction,

or impose concurrent sentences.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
§ 166.221 How do I acquire an advertised permit through competitive bidding? ( a ) As part of the negotiation of a permit, Indian landowners may advertise their Indian land to identify potential permittees with whom to negotiate.
( b ) When the BIA grants and approves a permit on behalf of an individual Indian landowner using an advertisement for bids, we will: ( 1 ) Prepare and distribute an advertisement of lands available for permit that identifies the terms and conditions of the permit sale, including, for agricultural permits, any preference rights;
( 2 ) Solicit sealed bids and conduct the public permit sale;
( 3 ) Determine and accept the highest or best responsible bidder(s), which may require further competitive bidding after the bid opening; and
( 4 ) Prepare permits for successful bidders.
( c ) After completion of the steps in paragraph (b) of this section, the successful bidder must complete and submit the permit and satisfy all applicable requirements, (e.g., bond, insurance, payment of administrative fee, etc.).
( d ) After review of the permit documentation for proper completion and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, within 30 days we will: ( 1 ) Grant and approve the permit on behalf of Indian landowners where we are authorized to do so by law;
( 2 ) Distribute the approved permit to the permittee(s) and, upon request, to the Indian landowner(s); and
( 3 ) Record and maintain the approved permit.
### §8880. Appeals and amendments in prize causes

(a) A United States Court of Appeals may allow an appeal in a prize cause if it appears that a notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the district court within thirty days after the final decree in that cause.

(b) A United States Court of Appeals, if in its opinion justice requires it, may allow amendments in form or substance of any appeal in a prize cause.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 483, §7680; renumbered §8880, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7680 | 34 U.S.C. 1146. | R.S. 1006; R.S. 4636. |

34 U.S.C. 1146 and this section reflect—

(1) Acts of March 3, 1911, ch. 231, §128, 36 Stat. 1133, and February 13, 1925, ch. 229, §1, 43 Stat. 938, which defined the appellate jurisdiction of the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals; and

(2) Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 869, which repealed the 1911 and 1925 Acts, but enacted similar provisions and changed the name of the circuit courts to United States Courts of Appeals for the several circuits.

The words "or of intention to appeal" are omitted as surplusage. Formerly "notices of appeal" were filed in some courts and "notices of intention to appeal" were filed in others. The difference was in terminology, not in substance. These notices are now known as "notices of appeal". The words "next" and "the rendition of" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7680 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.