Exhibit 34.1

** **

**Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board ofDirectors

Hyundai CapitalAmerica:

 

We have examined management’sassessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria (Management’sAssessment), that Hyundai Capital America (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Regulation AB relating to the servicing of auto receivable backed security transactions issuedon or after January 1, 2006 (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(3)(iii)-(iv),1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs withrespect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013. With respect to applicable servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii)and 1122(d)(4)(iii), the Company has determined that there were no activities performed during the year ended December 31, 2013with respect to the Platform, because there were no occurrences of events that would require the Company to perform such activities.Appendix A to Management’s Assessment identifies the individual asset backed transactions and securities defined by managementas constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibilityis to express an opinion on Management’s Assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on atest basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either priorto or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

As described in the accompanying Management’sAssessment, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activitiesrequired by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that none of these vendors is considered a “servicer”as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with theservicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manualof Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations (Interpretation 17.06). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has assertedthat it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors’ activities complyin all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determiningthat it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion,and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company’s eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

 

 

In our opinion, management’s assessmentthat Hyundai Capital America complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) and1122(d)(4)(iv) for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, is fairly stated as of andfor the year ended December 31, 2013, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Irvine, California

March 21, 2014