alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CURCIO**

**+COHEN**

 

 

**Report of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examined management’s assertion,included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2015 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s RegulationAB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’sReport. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisoror operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’sReport. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsiblefor the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, including examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selected sample of the servicingactivities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our examination was not designed to detect materialnoncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected the Company’sservicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis forour opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertionthat the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Reportwith respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31,2015, for the Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen, CPA’S, P.C.

 

 

New York, NY

February 15, 2016

 

 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PC 7 PENN PLAZA,SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL: 212 557-9800 FAX: 212 557 9819 WEBSITE:WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
### §9495. Funds appropriated for the Civil Air Patrol

Funds appropriated for the Civil Air Patrol shall be available only for the exclusive use of the Civil Air Patrol.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1090(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–297, §9445; renumbered §9495, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 9445 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Oct. 30, 2000, see section 1 [[div. A], title X, §1090(c)] of Pub. L. 106–398, set out as a note under section 9491 of this title.
# C_2006178EN.01000802.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/8

---

Judgement of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation, Belgium) — Uradex SCRL v Union Professionnelle de la Radio et de la Télédistribution (RTD), Société Intercommunale pour la Diffusion de la Télévision (BRUTELE)

(Case C-169/05) (1)

1

(Copyright and related rights - Directive 93/83/EEC - Article 9(2) - Scope of the powers of a collecting society deemed to be mandated to manage the rights of a copyright owner or holder of related rights which has not transferred the management of his rights to it - Exercise of the right to grant or refuse permission to a cable operator to retransmit a programme by cable)

(2006/C 178/13)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Uradex SCRL

Applicant:

Defendant: Union Professionnelle de la Radio et de la Télédistribution (RTD), Société Intercommunale pour la Diffusion de la Télévision (BRUTELE)

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Belgian Court of Cassation — Interpretation of Article 9(2) of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission (OJ L 248, 1993, p. 15) — Extent of the powers of a collecting society deemed to be mandated to manage the rights of a copyright owner or holder of related rights who has not transferred the management of his rights to a collecting society — Exercise of the right to grant or refuse authorisation to a cable operator for cable retransmission

Operative part of the judgement

Article 9(2) of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission is to be interpreted as meaning that, where a collecting society is deemed to be mandated to manage the rights of a copyright owner or holder of related rights who has not transferred the management of his rights to a collecting society, that society has the power to exercise that rightholder's right to grant or refuse authorisation to a cable operator for cable retransmission and, consequently, its mandate is not limited to management of the pecuniary aspects of those rights.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

1

---
#### § 211.8 Government employees cannot acquire leases.

U.S. Government employees are prevented from acquiring leases or interests in leases by the provisions of 25 CFR part 140 and 43 CFR part 20 pertaining to conflicts of interest and ownership of an interest in trust land.
#### § 293.25 May a compact or amendment include provisions addressing employee background investigations and licensing?

Yes. Consistent with 25 CFR 558.1, a compact or amendment may include provisions addressing the Tribe's standards and requirements for employee background investigations and licensing. If the compact or amendment includes a negotiated allocation to the State for concurring in or processing employee background investigations or licenses, the parties must show that the licensing process is as stringent and timely as the background investigation and licensing requirements of 25 CFR parts 556 and 558. The compact may also include provisions for the reasonable reimbursement of background investigation and licensing fees.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2011 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2011-C, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2012 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2012.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28th day of March 2013.

 

----

 
| March 28,   2013 |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |   |
|                  | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman |
|                  | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman |
|                  | Title: | President |

 

----
§ 225.32 Permission to start operations. ( a ) No exploration, drilling, or mining operations are permitted on any Indian lands before the Secretary has granted written approval of the minerals agreement pursuant to the regulations. After a minerals agreement is approved, written permission to start operations must be secured by applying for the permits referred to in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Applicable permits in accordance with rules and regulations in 30 CFR part 750, 43 CFR parts 3160, 3260, 3480, 3590, and Orders or Notices to Lessees (NTL) issued thereunder shall be required before actual operations are conducted on the minerals agreement acreage.
EX-10.16





 Exhibit 10.16 

Employment Letter Amendment 

Chobani Global Holdings, LLC 

December 20, 2018 
 Hamdi Ulukaya 

Chobani Global Holdings, LLC 
 200 Lafayette St, FL #6 

New York, New York 10012 
 Re: Amendment to
Updated Compensation Terms 
 Dear Hamdi: 
 This letter
amends certain terms of the Employment Letter Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2018, by and between you and Chobani Global Holdings, LLC (the “Company”). 

The following language will be added following the last sentence of Section 5 (Personal Benefits): 

“Subject to prior approval by HOOPP Capital Partners (Greek) LLC (“HOOPP”) (in writing or via email) of the payment of such costs and expenses
as provided herein, you shall also be entitled to have the Company pay on your behalf, or for reimbursement from the Company, for legal costs and expenses incurred in connection with the assertion by Ayse Giray of a potential Liquidity Event as such
term is defined in the Confidential Settlement and Release Agreement, dated July 1 2015, by and among you, Euphrates, Inc., Chobani, LLC and Ayse Giray; provided that all bills/time sheets for such costs and expenses shall be provided to HOOPP
for approval prior to payment.” 
 Please indicate your acceptance of these terms by countersignature below. 

 

			
	Sincerely,
	
	CHOBANI GLOBAL HOLDINGS, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mick Beekhuizen

	Name:	 	Mick Beekhuizen
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer


  

							
	Agreed and Accepted:	 		 		 	
				
	 /s/ Hamdi Ulukaya
	 		 		 	 December 20, 2018

	Hamdi Ulukaya	 		 		 	Date


  
 [Signature Page to
Employment Letter Amendment]
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lanbo Financial Group, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Pingji Lu,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Lanbo Financial Group,
Inc., and Yulong Wan, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of our knowledge:

1. The report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lanbo Financial
Group, Inc. as of and for the period covered by the Report.

      Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.



Dated:  November  14, 2005                      /s/ Pingji Lu
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Pingji Lu
                               Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


Dated:  November  14, 2005                      /s/ Yulong Wan
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Yulong Wan
                               Chief Financial Officer
§ 39.702 Can a school receive funds to transport residential students using commercial transportation? A school transporting students by commercial bus, train, airplane, or other commercial modes of transportation will be funded at the cost of the commercial ticket for: ( a ) The trip from home to school in the Fall;
( b ) The round-trip return home at Christmas; and
( c ) The return trip home at the end of the school year.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 448 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 10, 2000.
Whereas on April 19, 1995, as the result of an act of terrorism, a bomb exploded 
        in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, collapsing the north face of the 9-story 
        Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building;
Whereas April 19, 2000, marks the 5th anniversary of this tragic event;
Whereas the explosion killed more than 168 people, including 19 children, and 
        injured more than 700 others in the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building 
        and in and around surrounding buildings;
Whereas the explosion destroyed a childcare facility located in the Alfred P. 
        Murrah Federal Building, killing 15 children;
Whereas 320 surrounding buildings were impacted from the explosion;
Whereas flying glass and debris from the explosion were a major cause of injury; 
        and
Whereas greater awareness and sensitivity to the safe design and operation of 
        buildings could help make the people who live and work in and around the 
        buildings safer: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the countless acts of goodwill by the thousands of 
        volunteers (including those who donated goods and services), rescue 
        workers, and Federal, State, and local officials who assisted in the 
        rescue and recovery efforts following the bombing in Oklahoma City, 
        Oklahoma, on April 19, 1995;
            (2) sends continued condolences to the families, friends, and loved 
        ones who still suffer from the consequences of the bombing;
            (3) pledges to make Federal buildings safer, while still maintaining 
        a level of openness to the citizens served by the buildings;
            (4) pledges to create an awareness of the dangers of flying glass 
        and debris resulting from an act of terrorism, an explosion, or a 
        natural disaster; and
            (5) pledges to support efforts to make buildings more secure for 
        people from flying glass and debris and to promote the use of available 
        technology to protect people from such glass and debris.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 335 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 135
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 335

                          [Report No. 106-401]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2670) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 1999

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2670) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2670) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, 
and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 135

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 335

                          [Report No. 106-401]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2670) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 19, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service

Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank**(the "Servicer" ). 

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229 .1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations ( the "CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2( ii ), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions").

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori Eshoo 

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 12, 2015
# C_2006190EN.01002201.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/22

---

Action brought on 21 March 2006 — Nikolaos Theofilopoulos v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-91/06)

(2006/C 190/39)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Nikolaos Theofilopoulos (Athens, Greece) (represented by: P. Miliarakis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | order the Commission to return letters of guarantee Nos 81928/6.12.1995, 819837/6.12.1995, 819838/6.12.1995, 822611/22.12.1995 and 830671/17.3.1996 of the Tamio Sintaxion Mikhanikon and Ergolipton Dimosion Ergon (TSMEDE); |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to return letters of guarantee Nos 81928/6.12.1995, 819837/6.12.1995, 819838/6.12.1995, 822611/22.12.1995 and 830671/17.3.1996 of the Tamio Sintaxion Mikhanikon and Ergolipton Dimosion Ergon (TSMEDE);

| — | order the Commission to pay EUR 202 697,72 or, in the alternative, EUR 199 219,69 in respect of material damage arising up to February 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay EUR 202 697,72 or, in the alternative, EUR 199 219,69 in respect of material damage arising up to February 2006;

| — | order the Commission to pay EUR 100 000 in respect of non-material damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay EUR 100 000 in respect of non-material damage;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant states that, following his own guarantee, the five letters of guarantee were issued by TSMEDE for the companies ‘Impetus EPE’ and ‘Impetus AEVE’, on which he is President and Managing Director. Those letters of guarantee were lodged by the above companies with the Commission in connection with contracts which they had entered into with the Commission. The applicant maintains that the Commission unlawfully and culpably refused to return those letters of guarantee, although it had no reason to retain them. He considers that that unlawful and culpable conduct of the Commission's bodies justifies this application, since he himself is required to pay TSMEDE the amounts in respect of which those letters were issued.

---