alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Stethem Enhances Anti-submarine Warfare Skills during SHAREM ExerciseDecember 24, 2014 — Sailors aboard the Arleigh-burke class guided-missile destroyer USSStethem (DDG 63) participated in the Ship Anti-submarine Warfare (ASW)Readiness and Evaluation Measurement (SHAREM) exercise, Dec... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of 
January 25-26, 2011

    In accordance with Section 271.25 of its rules regarding 
availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below 
the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market 
Committee at its meeting held on January 25-26, 2011.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee 
at its meeting held on January 25-26, 2011, which includes the 
domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon 
request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
Washington, DC 20551. The minutes are published in the Federal 
Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's Annual Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee 
seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with Federal funds 
trading in a range from 0 to \1/4\ percent. The Committee directs the 
Desk to execute purchases of longer-term Treasury securities in order 
to increase the total face value of domestic securities held in the 
System Open Market Account to approximately $2.6 trillion by the end of 
June 2011. The Committee also directs the Desk to reinvest principal 
payments from agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in 
longer term Treasury securities. The System Open Market Account Manager 
and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing 
developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the 
attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum 
employment and price stability.

    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, February 17, 
2011.
William B. English,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-4124 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 02-4848



# 

R OGER S TROMAN ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron M. Currie, District Judge. (CR-02-86-CMC) Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL John H. Hare, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Roger Stroman pleaded guilty to armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (2000), and brandishing a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (2000). Stroman was sentenced to 294 monthsincarceration, 5 years of supervised release, and ordered to pay a special assessment and restitution. Stroman’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting two claims. First, Stroman asserts the district court erred in conducting his plea colloquy. Because Stroman did not seek to withdraw his guilty plea in the district court, we review this claim for plain error. United States v. General , 278 F.3d 389, 393 (4th Cir. 2002). This claim is meritless. The district court did not err in conducting Stroman’s plea colloquy. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Second, Stroman asserts the district court erred in calculating his sentence, because it included in his criminal history a conviction thatwas more than fifteen years old. A sentencing court’s factual determinations are reviewed for clear error, while its legal interpretation of the sentencing guidelines is reviewed de novo. United States v. Bartley , 230 F.3d 667, 669 (4th Cir. 2000). This claim is meritless. Stroman’s parole for this offense had been revoked twice within the last fifteen years, and it was therefore properly included in his criminal history. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2 (2000). Accordingly, we affirm Stroman’s conviction and sentence. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and find no other meritorious issues for appeal. This courtrequires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests such a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre2 U NITED S TATES v. S TROMANsented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. S TROMAN
### §2264. Reimbursement for assistance provided to nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producers

(a) In General.—There shall be credited to the applicable appropriations account or fund from which the expenses described in subsection (b) were charged any amounts received by the Department of Defense as reimbursement for such expenses.

(b) Description of Expenses.—The expenses referred to in subsection (a) are any expenses—

(1) incurred by the Department of Defense as a result of providing assistance to a nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producer;

(2) for which the Department of Defense requires reimbursement under section 9701 of title 31 or any other provision of law; and

(3) for which the Department of Defense received reimbursement after December 19, 2014.

(Added Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title VIII, §859(a), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3461; amended Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1081(a)(29), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1595.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 115–91 substituted "December 19, 2014" for "the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. 'Buck' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015".
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  ERISA Section 4050 Mortality Table For 2017 Valuation Dates 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# ERISA Section 4050 Mortality Table for 2017 Valuation Dates

This mortality table is used as part of the "missing participant annuity assumptions" as discussed in 29 CFR 4050. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

November 29, 2018

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
# C_2006249EN.01000601.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/6

---

Action brought on 24 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-351/06)

(2006/C 249/12)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and I. Kaufmann-Bühler, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2003/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products (1) or by not informing the Commission of such provisions, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 10 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2003/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products (1) or by not informing the Commission of such provisions, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 10 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive expired on 31 July 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 152, p. 16

1

---
#### § 41.57 When will the application be reviewed?

Within 45 days of receiving the application the BIE will send a grant agreement for signature by the Diné College president or his or her designee in an amount determined under § 41.29(a). The grant agreement will incorporate the grant application and include the provisions required by § 41.25.
### §8023. Office of Naval Research: appropriations; time limit

(a) Sums appropriated for the Office of Naval Research may be used to pay the cost of performing its duties under section 8022 of this title including the cost of—

(1) administration;

(2) conduct of research and development work in Government facilities; and

(3) conduct of research and development work under contracts with individuals, corporations, and educational or scientific institutions.

(b) Sums appropriated for the purposes of this section, if obligated during the fiscal year for which appropriated, remain available for expenditure for four years after the end of that fiscal year. Any balance not spent after that four-year period shall be carried to the surplus fund and covered into the Treasury.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 291, §5152; renumbered §5023 and amended Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §§511(d), 514(c)(2), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1048, 1055; renumbered §8023 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§807(a)(1), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5152 | 5 U.S.C. 475d(a) (less 2d sentence). | Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 727, §5 (a) (less 2d sentence), 60 Stat. 780. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 475d(b). | Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 727, §5 (b), 60 Stat. 780. |

The authorization to make appropriations for the Office of Naval Research is omitted as unnecessary. The word "administration" is substituted for the words "administrative expenses" for brevity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8023 was renumbered section 9023 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §807(a)(1), renumbered section 5023 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 8022" for "section 5022" in introductory provisions.

1986—Pub. L. 99–433, §511(d), renumbered section 5152 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–433, §514(c)(2), substituted "section 5022" for "section 5151".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
H. Res. 291 

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

September 15, 1999. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 2490) making appropriations for the Treasury 

Department, the United States Postal Service, the Executive 

Office of the President, and certain Independent Agencies, 

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other 

purposes. All points of order against the conference report 

and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
H. Res. 345

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 28, 1999.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 3064) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against revenues of said District for

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and

against its consideration are waived. The conference report

shall be considered as read. The conference report shall be

debatable for two hours equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Appropriations.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### James A. Boyd, *Appellant,*v. State of Kansas, *Appellee.*

No. 48,056

Opinion filed March 6, 1976.

*Robert A. DeCoursey,*of Kansas City, Kansas, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant.

*Nick A. Tomasic,*district attorney, argued the cause, and *Curt T.*Schneider, attorney general, was with him on the brief for the appellee.

Owsley, J.

Affirmed.
### §487. Biannual briefing on missile defense and related activities

(a) In General.—On or about June 1 and December 1 of each year, the officials specified in subsection (b) shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on matters relating to missile defense policies, operations, technology development, and other similar topics as requested by such committees.

(b) Officials Specified.—The officials specified in this subsection are the following:

(1) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition.

(2) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy.

(3) The Director of the Missile Defense Agency.

(4) The Director for Strategy, Plans, and Policy of the Joint Staff.

(c) Delegation.—An official specified in subsection (b) may delegate the authority to provide a briefing required by subsection (a) to a member of the Senior Executive Service who reports to the official.

(d) Termination.—The requirement to provide a briefing under subsection (a) shall terminate on January 1, 2028.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title XVI, §1651, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2947.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 487, added Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title IX, §923(b)(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 724; amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title V, §541(c), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1477; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1084(d)(4), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2061, related to annual report on unit operations tempo and personnel tempo, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, §1061(9)(A), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1583.
H. Res. 539

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 28, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order, without intervention of any point of order,

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4680) to amend title

XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a voluntary

program for prescription drug coverage under the Medicare

Program, to modernize the Medicare Program, and for other

purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment.

The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways

and Means now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,

as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill, as amended, equally

divided among and controlled by the chairmen and ranking

minority members of the Committee on Ways and Means and

the Committee on Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
2

•HRES 539 EH

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 4680, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair

may postpone further consideration of the bill until a time

designated by the Speaker.

SEC. 3. It shall be in order at any time on or before the

legislative day of Friday, June 30, 2000, for the Speaker to

entertain motions to suspend the rules with respect to the following measures:

(1) The bill (H.R. 3240) to amend the Federal

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify certain responsibilities of the Food and Drug Administration with respect to the importation of drugs into the United States;

and

(2) the resolution (H. Res. 535) expressing the

sense of the House of Representatives concerning use of

additional projected surplus funds to supplement Medicare funding, previously reduced under the Balanced

Budget Act of 1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 18.303 When will the Department approve or disapprove a single heir rule?

We have 90 days from receipt by the Assistant Secretary of a single heir rule submitted separate from a tribal probate code to approve or disapprove a single heir rule.
§ 293.15 When may the Secretary disapprove a compact or amendment? The Secretary may disapprove a compact or amendment only if: ( a ) It violates: ( 1 ) Any provision of IGRA;
( 2 ) Any other provision of Federal law that does not relate to jurisdiction over gaming on Indian lands; or
( 3 ) The trust obligations of the United States to Indians; or
( b ) The documents required in § 293.8 are not submitted and the parties have been informed in writing of the missing documents and are provided with an opportunity to supply those documents.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3835]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, 
as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Inspectorate America Corporation, 3773 Pacheco Blvd., Suite 
D, Martinez, CA 94553, has been approved to gauge and accredited to 
test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes in 
accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. 
Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and 
gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the 
entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. 
Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service 
this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#630001134d0f02010b1223070b104d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="442726346a2825262c3504202c376a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories.

http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on 
July 8, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for 
July 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 10, 2011.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-3835 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>