alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 48.113 Will late payment charges or special fees apply to delinquent lease payments?

(a) Late payment charges will apply as specified in the lease. The failure to pay these amounts will be treated as a lease violation.

(b) The Bureau may assess the following special fees to cover administrative costs incurred by the United States in the collection of the debt, if rent is not paid in the time and manner required, in addition to late payment charges that must be paid under the terms of the lease:

Table 1 to paragraph (b)

| The lessee will pay . . . | For . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) $50.00 | Any dishonored check. |
| (2) $15.00 | Processing of each notice or demand letter. |
| (3) 18 percent of balance due | Treasury processing following referral for collection of delinquent debt. |
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF

                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:


     The Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





         Dated: August 1, 2005             /s/ Elie Housman
                                           ----------------
                                           Elie Housman, Chief Executive Officer








         Dated: August 1, 2005             /s/ Eyal Bigon
                                           --------------
                                           Eyal Bigon, Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 214.17 Use of timber from restricted lands.

Lessees will not be permitted to use any timber from any Osage lands not relieved of restrictions upon alienation except under written agreement with the owner approved by the officer in charge.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Maryland�sforest resources.**
 
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.163/20:
Item Number:0084-N-20 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001047996
 
May 31, 2018
# C_2006224EN.01002901.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/29

---

Action brought on 25 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-326/06)

(2006/C 224/54)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by not adopting the provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/86/EC of 8 October 2001 supplementing the Statute for a European company with regard to the involvement of employees (1) and, in any event, by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by not adopting the provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/86/EC of 8 October 2001 supplementing the Statute for a European company with regard to the involvement of employees (1) and, in any event, by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for adapting domestic law to Directive 2001/86/EC expired on 8 October 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 294, p. 22.

1

---
§ 514.16 How does the Commission adopt the fingerprint processing fee? ( a ) The Commission shall review annually the costs involved in processing fingerprint cards and, by a vote of not less than two of its members, shall adopt the fingerprint processing fee no later than November 1st of each year.
( b ) The Commission shall publish the fingerprint processing fee in a notice in the Federal Register.
( c ) The fingerprint processing fee shall be based on fees charged by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and costs incurred by the Commission. Commission costs include Commission personnel, supplies, equipment costs, and postage to submit the results to the requesting tribe.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Navy Hangar Construction Continues on Kadena Air Base

By Airman 1st Class John Linzmeier, 18th Wing Public Affairs

                KADENA AIR BASE, Japan  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom news articles

Navy Hangar Construction Continues on Kadena Air Base
#### Larry J. Maciejewski, appellant, v. John L. Sullivan, Director of the Department of Motor Vehicles of the State of Nebraska, appellee.

228 N. W. 2d 294

Filed April 24, 1975.

No. 39766.

Duane L. Nelson, for appellant.

Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Steven C. Smith, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.

Brodkey, J.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the District Court for Lancaster County affirming an order of the Director of Motor Vehicles revoking the driver’s license of appellant for the reason that he had accumulated 12 points against his driver’s license within a 2-year period. On January 27, 1974, appellant was given a traffic ticket in Lincoln, Nebraska, for not having a driver’s license in his possession. At the time he had a valid Nebraska license. Subsequent thereto, a complaint was filed against him in the Lincoln municipal court, alleging a violation of section 10.52.040 of the Lincoln municipal code, which made it an offense for any person to operate a motor vehicle upon any street or highway within the city without having on his person and in full force and effect an operator’s license or *599learner’s permit to operate it as provided by the laws of the State of Nebraska. Appellant was under the impression that he had forwarded the defect ticket he received to the police department with his driver’s license, as required, but the court had no record of this having been done. He entered a guilty plea by waiver and was, on March 11, 1974, fined $2 and costs. An abstract of the conviction was forwarded to the Director of Motor Vehicles and two points were assessed against the driving record of appellant. Those points brought appellant’s total accumulation to .12 points within a 2-year period, and on April 29, 1974, the Director of Motor Vehicles, acting ministerially pursuant to statute, issued an order revoking his operator’s license and operating privileges for a period of 1 year. Appellant appealed to the District Court for Lancaster County, arguing that since he was charged and convicted under the aforementioned ordinance of the City of Lincoln rather than under section 60-413, R. R. S. 1943, the Director was in error in assessing two points for the latter conviction. The District Court affirmed the order of the Director of Motor Vehicles.

The issue presented in this case was considered and decided in Coffey v. Sullivan, 191 Neb. 781, 217 N. W. 2d 918 (1974), and that case is dispositive of the present case. Further, the record reveals that appellant did not raise the issue of the unconstitutionality of the Lincoln ordinance involved in this case or of sections 39-669.22 and 39-669.26, R. R. S. 1943, in his motion for a new trial in the District Court, and those issues are therefore not involved in this appeal. See, also, State v. Lessert, 188 Neb. 243, 196 N. W. 2d 166 (1972).

Affirmed.
#### § 513.40 How will the Commission handle debt collection through administrative wage garnishment?

This part adopts all the provisions of the administrative wage garnishment regulations contained in 31 CFR 285.11, promulgated by Treasury, which allow Federal agencies to collect debts from a debtor's non-Federal pay by means of administrative wage garnishment authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3720D, and in 5 CFR parts 581 and 582, promulgated by the Office of Personnel Management, which provides for garnishment orders for child support and/or alimony and commercial garnishment of federal employees' pay.
### §467. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) The term "function" means any duty, obligation, responsibility, privilege, activity, or program.

(2)(A) The term "imagery" means, except as provided in subparagraph (B), a likeness or presentation of any natural or manmade feature or related object or activity and the positional data acquired at the same time the likeness or representation was acquired, including—

(i) products produced by space-based national intelligence reconnaissance systems; and

(ii) likenesses or presentations produced by satellites, airborne platforms, unmanned aerial vehicles, or other similar means.

(B) Such term does not include handheld or clandestine photography taken by or on behalf of human intelligence collection organizations.

(3) The term "imagery intelligence" means the technical, geographic, and intelligence information derived through the interpretation or analysis of imagery and collateral materials.

(4) The term "geospatial information" means information that identifies the geographic location and characteristics of natural or constructed features and boundaries on or about the earth and includes—

(A) data and information derived from, among other things, remote sensing, mapping, and surveying technologies; and

(B) mapping, charting, geomatics data, and related products and services.

(5) The term "geospatial intelligence" means the exploitation and analysis of imagery and geospatial information to describe, assess, and visually depict physical features and geographically referenced activities on or about the earth. Geospatial intelligence consists of imagery, imagery intelligence, and geospatial information.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XI, §1112(a)(2), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2682; amended Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title IX, §933(b)(2), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1866; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IX, §921(b), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1568; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVI, §1621(f), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4054.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Par. (4). Pub. L. 116–283, §1621(f)(1)(A), inserted "or about" after "boundaries on" in introductory provisions.

Par. (4)(A). Pub. L. 116–283, §1621(f)(1)(B), struck out "statistical" before "data".

Par. (4)(B). Pub. L. 116–283, §1621(f)(1)(C), substituted "geomatics" for "geodetic" and inserted "and services" after "products".

Par. (5). Pub. L. 116–283, §1621(f)(2), inserted "or about" after "activities on".

2003—Par. (5). Pub. L. 108–136 added par. (5).

1997—Par. (4). Pub. L. 105–85 inserted "and" at end of subpar. (A), substituted "geodetic data, and related products." for "and geodetic data; and" in subpar. (B), and struck out subpar. (C) which read as follows: "geodetic products, as defined in section 455(c) of this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1124 of Pub. L. 104–201, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 193 of this title.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Roland Vetter, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of QuadTech
International, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

March 19, 2007



|/s/ J. Roland Vetter
    
    J. Roland Vetter
    Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00295-CV

IN RE WILLIAM SULLIVAN RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied.2 Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

2

The relator complains that the respondent has failed to hold a hearing on 

his pro se application for writ of habeas corpus bond reduction, but the trial court 

clerk has indicated that relator is still represented by appointed counsel and that 

there is no motion to withdraw on file. See Ex parte Bohannan, 350 S.W.3d 116, 

116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (noting that when an applicant is represented by 

counsel, he is not entitled to hybrid representation, and the court can disregard 

his pro se submissions and take no action on them).
2

DELIVERED: July 25, 2012
### §8669. Contracts: applicability of chapter 65 of title 41

Each contract for the construction, alteration, furnishing, or equipping of a naval vessel is subject to chapter 65 of title 41 unless the President determines that this requirement is not in the interest of national defense.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title VIII, §815(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 396, §7299; amended Pub. L. 111–350, §5(b)(52), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3846; renumbered §8669, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7299 of this title as this section.

2011—Pub. L. 111–350 substituted "chapter 65 of title 41" for "Walsh-Healey Act" in section catchline and for "the Walsh-Healey Act (41 U.S.C. 35 et seq.)" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 21 - 00107 - CV CASEY GLYNN DOBBS , A PPELLANT V. RACHEL MEDIA ANN MILLER , APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court Oldham County, Texas Trial Court No . 771 , Honorable David L. Gleason , Presiding



### June 15 , 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. Appellant Casey G lynn Dobbs, a Texas inmate proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s Order of Dismissal without paying the required f iling fee. 1 By letter of May 14, 2021, we directed Dobbs to pay the filing fee or, in lieu thereof, to comply

1 Dobbs filed a notice of appeal within fifteen days after the notice of appeal deadline. By letter of May 17, 2021, we notified Dobbs that a motion for an extension of time was implied and directed him to provide a reasonable explanation for his late notic e. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 26.3, 10.5(b); Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Jones v. City of Houston , 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998). Because Dobbs has filed a response reasonably explaining the delay, an extension of time to file the lat e notice of appeal is granted.2

with chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code by filing 1) an affidavit of indigence, 2) an affidavit relating to previous filings, an d 3) a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. See T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . §§ 14.002(a), 14.004 (West 2017). We advised Dobbs that this appeal was subject to dismissal if he did not comply by May 24, 2021. Dobbs has filed an affid avit of indigence but has not filed an affidavit describing his previous filings or a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement to date. The requirement to pay the filing fee or tender an affidavit of indigence, an affidavit of previous filings, and a certified copy of an inmate trust account statement is mandatory, and the lack thereof is grounds for dismissal of an appeal or original proceeding. See In re Denson , No. 07 - 20 - 00191 - CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 6966, at *1 (Tex. App. — Amarillo Aug. 27, 2020, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.). Because Dobbs has failed to pay the filing fee or comply with all the requirements of chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code within the time provided for compliance, we di smiss his appeal. Per Curiam
### §933. Art. 133. Conduct unbecoming an officer

Any commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman who is convicted of conduct unbecoming an officer shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 76; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, §542(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1709.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 933 | 50:727. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 133), 64 Stat. 142. |

The word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81 struck out "and a gentleman" after "an officer" in section catchline and text.