10410 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices 

1Request of the United States Postal Service to 

Add International Business Reply Service 

Competitive Contract 3 to the Competitive Products 

List and Notice of Filing of Contract (Under Seal), 

February 11, 2011 (Request). 

be, adversely affected. The inspection 

determined that the licensee conformed 

to the subject NRC regulatory 

requirements pertinent in this 

circumstance and applicable to 

assessing the cause and effect of the 

CRDM nozzle cracking conditions. 

A copy of the Director’s Decision will 

be filed with the Secretary of the 

Commission for the Commission’s 

review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206 

of the Commission’s regulations. As 

provided for by this regulation, the 

Director’s Decision will constitute the 

final action of the Commission 25 days 

after the date of the decision, unless the 

Commission, on its own motion, 

institutes a review of the Director’s 

Decision within that time. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day 

of February 2011. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Eric J. Leeds, 

Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4147 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2011–0006] 

Sunshine Federal Register Notice 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

DATES: Weeks of February 21, 28, March 

7, 14, 21, 28, 2011. 

PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference 

Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland. 

STATUS: Public and Closed. 

Week of February 21, 2011 

Thursday, February 24, 2011 

9 a.m. Briefing on Groundwater Task 

Force (Public Meeting) (Contact: 

Margie Kotzalas, 301–415–1727) 

This meeting will be webcast live at 

the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov, 

Week of February 28, 2011—Tentative 

Tuesday, March 1, 2011 

9 a.m. Briefing on Reactor Materials 

Aging Management Issues (Public 

Meeting) (Contact: Allen Hiser, 

301–415–5650) 

This meeting will be webcast live at 

the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov, 

Week of March 7, 2011—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of March 7, 2011. 

Week of March 14, 2011—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of March 14, 2011. 

Week of March 21, 2011—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of March 21, 2011. 

Week of March 28, 2011—Tentative 

Tuesday, March 29, 2011 

9 a.m. Briefing on Small Modular 

Reactors (Public Meeting) (Contact: 

Stephanie Coffin, 301–415–6877) 

This meeting will be webcast live at 

the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov, 

* * * * * 

*The schedule for Commission 

meetings is subject to change on short 

notice. To verify the status of meetings, 

call (recording)—(301) 415–1292. 

Contact person for more information: 

Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651. 

* * * * * 

The NRC Commission Meeting 

Schedule can be found on the Internet 

at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html, 

* * * * * 

The NRC provides reasonable 

accommodation to individuals with 

disabilities where appropriate. If you 

need a reasonable accommodation to 

participate in these public meetings, or 

need this meeting notice or the 

transcript or other information from the 

public meetings in another format (e.g. 

braille, large print), please notify Bill 

Dosch, Chief, Work Life and Benefits 

Branch, at 301–415–6200, TDD: 301– 

415–2100, or by e-mail at 

william.dosch@nrc.gov. Determinations 

on requests for reasonable 

accommodation will be made on a caseby-case basis. 

* * * * * 

This notice is distributed 

electronically to subscribers. If you no 

longer wish to receive it, or would like 

to be added to the distribution, please 

contact the Office of the Secretary, 

Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969), 

or send an e-mail to 

darlene.wright@nrc.gov. 

Dated: February 17, 2011. 

Rochelle C. Bavol, 

Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4150 Filed 2–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket No. MC2011–21 and CP2011–59; 

Order No. 674] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add International Business Reply 

Service (IBRS) Competitive Contract 3 to 

the competitive product list. The Postal 

Service also states that it has entered 

into an additional IBRS contract, which 

is the successor to an IBRS 2 contract. 

DATES: Comments are Due: February 22, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically by accessing the ‘‘Filing 

Online’’ link in the banner at the top of 

the Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing 

the Commission’s Filing Online system 

at https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filingonline/login.aspx. Commenters who 

cannot submit their views electronically 

should contact the person identified in 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section as the source for case-related 

information for advice on alternatives to 

electronic filing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

at 202–789–6820 (case-related 

information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov 

(electronic filing assistance). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On February 11, 2011, the Postal 

Service filed a request pursuant to 39 

U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq. 

to add International Business Reply 

Service (IBRS) Competitive Contract 3 to 

the competitive product list and 

announcing that it has entered into an 

additional IBRS contract, which is the 

successor to an IBRS 2 contract.1 The 

Postal Service asserts that the new IBRS 

Competitive Contract 3 product is a 

competitive product ‘‘not of general 

applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 

U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The 

Request has been assigned Docket No. 

MC2011–21. 

The Postal Service 

contemporaneously filed a redacted 

contract related to the proposed new 

product pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) 

and 39 CFR 3015.5. Id. Attachment 2. 

The contract is assigned Docket No. 

CP2011–59. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices 10411 

2See Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting 

Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package 

Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August 

28, 2009 (Order No. 290). 

3See Docket Nos. MC2010–18, CP2010–21 and 

CP2010–22, Notice of the United States Postal 

Service of Filing Two Functionally Equivalent IBRS 

Contracts and Request to Establish Successor 

Instruments as Baseline International Business 

Reply Service Competitive Contract 2, February 9, 

2010. 

4The Postal Service states that the statement 

provided by Jo Ann Miller, originally filed in 

Docket No. MC2009–14 is applicable to the instant 

proceeding and supports the addition of IBRS 

Competitive Contract 3 to the competitive product 

list. 

5The Postal Service states that it does not intend 

to remove the IBRS Competitive Contract 2 from the 

competitive product list at this time. 

6See Order No. 178, Order Concerning 

International Business Reply Service Contract 1 

Negotiated Service Agreement, Docket Nos. 

MC2009–14 and CP2009–14, February 5, 2009. 

The Postal Service uses IBRS 

contracts for customers that sell 

lightweight articles to foreign 

consumers and desire to offer their 

customers a way to return the articles to 

the United States for recycling, 

refurbishment, repair, or value-added 

processing. Id. at 4–5. 

The instant contract. The Postal 

Service filed the instant contract 

pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, 

the Postal Service contends that the 

contract is in accordance with Order No. 

290.2 The term of the instant contract is 

1 year from the date the Postal Service 

notifies the customer that all necessary 

regulatory approvals have been 

received. The agreement expires 1 year 

after the effective date unless the parties 

agree to an earlier termination. The 

Postal Service states that the instant 

contract is the successor agreement to 

the IBRS Competitive Contract 2 

contract in Docket No. CP2010–21 for 

the same mailer.3 Request at 3. The 

Postal Service notes that the current 

contract expires on February 28, 2011 

and its intent is to have the instant 

contract begin March 1, 2011. Id. at 4. 

In support of its Request, the Postal 

Service filed the following attachments: 

• Attachment 1—a Statement of 

Supporting Justification as required by 

39 CFR 3020.32; 

• Attachment 2—a redacted copy of 

the contract; 

• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of 

the certified statement required by 39 

CFR 3015.5(c)(2); 

• Attachment 4—Governors’ Decision 

No. 08–24 which establishes prices and 

classifications for the IBRS Contracts 

product; and includes Mail 

Classification Schedule (MCS) language 

for IBRS contracts, formulas for pricing 

along with an analysis, certification of 

the Governors vote, and certification of 

compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633 (a); and 

• Attachment 5—an application for 

non-public treatment of materials to 

maintain the redacted portions of the 

contract, customer identifying 

information and related financial 

information under seal. 

In the Statement of Supporting 

Justification, Jo Ann Miller, former 

Director, Global Business Development, 

asserts that the services to be provided 

under the instant contract will cover its 

attributable costs, make a positive 

contribution to institutional costs, and 

increase contribution toward the 

requisite 5.5 percent of total 

institutional costs charged to 

competitive products.4 Id. Attachment 1. 

Thus, Ms. Miller contends there will be 

no issue of subsidization of competitive 

products by market dominant products 

as a result of these contracts. Id. 

Baseline agreement. The Postal 

Service requests that the instant contract 

be deemed the new baseline agreement 

for functional equivalency analyses of 

the IBRS product.5 Id. at 2–4. The Postal 

Service asserts that the instant contract 

is essentially the same as the IBRS 

contracts filed previously. Id. at 4. The 

Postal Service represents that prices and 

classifications ‘‘not of general 

applicability’’ for IBRS contracts were 

established by Governors’ Decision No. 

08–24 filed in Docket Nos. MC2009–14 

and CP2009–20.6 It also identifies the 

instant contract as fitting within the 

MCS language for IBRS contracts 

included as an attachment to Governors’ 

Decision No. 08–24. Id. at 2. 

The Request advances reasons why 

IBRS Competitive Contracts 3 should be 

added to the competitive product list 

and fits within the MCS language for 

IBRS contracts. Id. at 4–5. The Postal 

Service also explains that a redacted 

version of the supporting financial 

documentation is included with this 

filing as a separate Excel file. Id. at 3. 

The Postal Service asserts that the 

instant contract is in compliance with 

39 U.S.C. 3633, is functionally 

equivalent to other IBRS agreements, fits 

within the MCS language for IBRS 

contracts, will serve as the new baseline 

contract for the proposed product, and 

should be added to the competitive 

product list included within the IBRS 

Competitive Contracts 3 product. Id. at 

5–6. Accordingly, it urges the 

Commission to add the proposed IBRS 

Competitive Contract 3 to the 

competitive product list along with the 

instant contract as the baseline 

agreement within the product. Id. at 6. 

II. Notice of Filing 

The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2011–21 and CP2011–59 for 

consideration of matters identified in 

the Postal Service’s Request. 

The Commission appoints Diane K. 

Monaco to serve as Public 

Representative in these dockets. 

Comments. Interested persons may 

submit comments on whether the Postal 

Service’s filings in the captioned 

dockets are consistent with the policies 

of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633 or 3642 and 39 

CFR part 3015 and 39 CFR part 3020 

subpart B. Comments are due no later 

than February 22, 2011. The public 

portions of these filings can be accessed 

via the Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov). 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2011–21 and CP2011–59 for 

consideration of the matters raised in 

these dockets. 

2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Diane K. 

Monaco is appointed to serve as officer 

of the Commission (Public 

Representative) to represent the 

interests of the general public in these 

proceedings. 

3. Comments by interested persons in 

these proceedings are due no later than 

February 22, 2011. 

4. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this Order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Ruth Ann Abrams, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–4055 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

Upon Written Request, Copies Available 

From: Securities and Exchange 

Commission, Office of Investor 

Education and Advocacy, 

Washington, DC 20549–0213. 

Extension: 

Electronic Data Collection System; OMB 

Control No. 3235–0672; SEC File No. 

270–621. 

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant 

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities 

and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments 

on the collection of information 

summarized below. The Commission 

plans to submit an extension for this 

current collection of information to the 

Office of Management and Budget for 

approval. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES