alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Malcolm E. Kafka, Appellant, v Meadowlark Gardens Owners, Inc., Respondent.

[826 NYS2d 83]

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to Lien Law § 201-a to cancel a lien against the petitioner’s shares of the respondent’s cooperative corporation and to enjoin the sale thereof, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated August 8, 2005, which denied the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petition. The petitioner’s argument that the 2004 stipulation of settlement entered into by the parties in a prior summary proceeding in the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, Housing Part, should be vacated because at the time of its entry, the petitioner was not represented by an attorney and it was patently unfair to him, is not properly before this Court as it . is raised for the first time on appeal *(see Zafran v Zafran,*28 AD3d 752 [2006]). Additionally, contrary to the petitioner’s contention, his shares in the respondent corporation were not being sold by the respondent pursuant to the Lien Law. Rather, the shares were noticed for sale pursuant to the terms of the proprietary lease following the lawful eviction of the petitioner from the subject apartment. Consequently, the petition failed to state a cause of action under Lien Law § 201-a and was properly denied.

Moreover, the petitioner’s attempt to argue in this proceeding *677that he still had a right to sell the apartment at a private sale because of some defect in the underlying eviction proceeding or its stipulation of settlement is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. “The doctrine of res judicata ‘operates to preclude the renewal of issues actually litigated and resolved in a prior proceeding as well as claims for different relief which arise out of the same factual grouping or transaction and which should have or could have been resolved in the prior proceeding’ ” *(Luscher v Arrua,*21 AD3d 1005, 1006-1007 [2005], quoting *Koether v Generalow,*213 AD2d 379, 380 [1995]). The prior Housing Court orders leaving the judgment of possession and warrant of eviction intact are conclusive on all of the issues raised in the petition herein and are entitled to res judicata effect (see *Matter of Schachter v State of N.Y. Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, Office of Rent Admin.,*14 AD3d 615, 616 [2005]). Accordingly, the petitioner’s lease was properly terminated by the respondent, allowing the sale of his shares, and the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding. Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4282 — Mondadori/Emap France) Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 202 , 25/08/2006 P. 0007 - 0007 *

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4282 — Mondadori/Emap France)

(2006/C 202/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 August 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4282. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
### [§2352. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title X, §1078(c)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 999]

Section, added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title II, §232(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1422; amended Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title II, §211(a), (b), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 703, related to the biennial strategic plan of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

A prior section 2352, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 133; Dec. 5, 1991, Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §803(a)(1), 105 Stat. 1414; Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1053(4), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2501, required Secretary of military department to give notice to Congress of contracts performed over a period exceeding 10 years, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1062(c)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 444.
#### WALTERIA M. SPAULDING v. R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.

No. 254A89

(Filed 18 January 1990)

APPEAL by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 93 N.C. App. 770, 379 S.E.2d 49 (1989), affirming an order of summary judgment for defendant entered by *DeRamus, J.,*on 28 January 1988 in Superior Court, FORSYTH County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 December 1989.

*Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy and Kennedy, by Harold L. Kennedy, III and Harvey L. Kennedy, for' plaintiff-appellant.*

*Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, by W. Andrew Copenhaver, M. Ann Anderson and Richard L. Rainey, for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### §690. Retired members ordered to active duty: limitation on number

(a) General and Flag Officers.—Not more than 15 retired general officers of the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force, and not more than 15 retired flag officers of the Navy, may be on active duty at any one time. For the purposes of this subsection a retired officer ordered to active duty for a period of 60 days or less is not counted.

(b) Limitation by Service.—(1) Not more than 25 officers of any one armed force may be serving on active duty concurrently pursuant to orders to active duty issued under section 688 of this title.

(2) In the administration of paragraph (1), the following officers shall not be counted:

(A) A chaplain who is assigned to duty as a chaplain for the period of active duty to which ordered.

(B) A health care professional (as characterized by the Secretary concerned) who is assigned to duty as a health care professional for the period of the active duty to which ordered.

(C) Any officer assigned to duty with the American Battle Monuments Commission for the period of active duty to which ordered.

(D) Any member of the Retiree Council of the Army, Navy, or Air Force for the period on active duty to attend the annual meeting of the Retiree Council.

(E) An officer who is assigned to duty as a defense attaché or service attaché for the period of active duty to which ordered.

(c) Waiver for Periods of War or National Emergency.—Subsection (a) does not apply in time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress or the President after November 30, 1980. Subsection (b) does not apply in time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress or the President.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title V, §521(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2516; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §507, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 591; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §509(b), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1091; Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1741(b)(1), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 680.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 690 was renumbered section 12321 of this title.

Provisions similar to those in subsecs. (a) and (c) of this section were contained in section 688(c) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–201, §521(a).

#### Amendments

2023—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–31 substituted "Marine Corps, or Space Force," for "or Marine Corps,".

2001—Subsec. (b)(2)(E). Pub. L. 107–107 added subpar. (E).

1999—Subsec. (b)(2)(D). Pub. L. 106–65 added subpar. (D).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2001 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–107 applicable with respect to officers serving on active duty as a defense attaché or service attaché on or after Dec. 28, 2001, see section 509(c) of Pub. L. 107–107, set out as a note under section 688 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 30, 1997, see section 521(b) of Pub. L. 104–201, set out as a note under section 688 of this title.
§ 211.22 Leases for subsurface storage of oil or gas. ( a ) The Secretary, with the consent of the Indian mineral owners, may approve storage leases, or modifications, amendments, or extensions of existing leases, on Indian lands to provide for the subsurface storage of oil or gas, irrespective of the lands from which production is initially obtained. The storage lease, or modification, amendment, or extension to an existing lease, shall provide for the payment of such storage fee or rental on such oil or gas as may be determined adequate in each case, or, in lieu thereof, for a royalty other than that prescribed in the oil and gas lease when such stored oil and gas is produced in conjunction with oil or gas not previously produced.
( b ) The Secretary, with consent of the Indian mineral owners, may approve a provision in an oil and gas lease under which storage of oil and gas is authorized, for continuance of the lease at least for the period of such storage use and so long thereafter as oil or gas not previously produced is produced in paying quantities.
( c ) Applications for subsurface storage of oil or gas shall be filed in triplicate with the authorized officer and shall disclose the ownership of the lands involved, the parties in interest, the storage fee, rental, or royalty offered to be paid for such storage, and all essential information showing the necessity for such project. Enough copies of the final agreement signed by the Indian mineral owners and other parties in interest shall be submitted for the approval of the Secretary to permit retention of five copies by the Department after approval.
# C_2014017EN.01001101.xml

| 21.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/11

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 17/08

| Date of adoption of the decision | 12.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37745 (13/N) |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Hyväksytyn valtiontukiohjelman N 88/08 ”Muutokset alueelliseen kuljetustukijärjestelmään” voimassaolon pidentäminen 30. kesäkuuta 2014 saakka
  Förlängning av den godkända statliga stödordningen N 88/08 (ändringar av regional transportstödordning) t.o.m. den 30 juni 2014 |
| Legal basis | Valtioneuvoston asetus alueellisesta kuljetustuesta
  Statsrådets förordning om regionalt transportstöd |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Regional development, Employment, SMEs |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | — |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 1.1.2014-30.6.2014 |
| Economic sectors | Manufacturing |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Kari Alanko |
| Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö |
| PL 32 |
| FI-00023 Valtioneuvosto |
| SUOMI/FINLAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

12.12.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37745 (13/N)

Member State

Finland

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Hyväksytyn valtiontukiohjelman N 88/08 ”Muutokset alueelliseen kuljetustukijärjestelmään” voimassaolon pidentäminen 30. kesäkuuta 2014 saakka

Förlängning av den godkända statliga stödordningen N 88/08 (ändringar av regional transportstödordning) t.o.m. den 30 juni 2014

Legal basis

Valtioneuvoston asetus alueellisesta kuljetustuesta

Statsrådets förordning om regionalt transportstöd

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Regional development, Employment, SMEs

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

—

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

1.1.2014-30.6.2014

Economic sectors

Manufacturing

Name and address of the granting authority

Kari Alanko

Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö

PL 32

FI-00023 Valtioneuvosto

SUOMI/FINLAND

| Kari Alanko |
| --- |
| Arbets- och näringsministeriet |
| PB 32 |
| FI-00023 Statsrådet |
| FINLAND |

Kari Alanko

Arbets- och näringsministeriet

PB 32

FI-00023 Statsrådet

FINLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
IV

House Calendar No. 203

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 471

[Report No. 106–574]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 94) proposing

an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with respect

to tax limitations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 11, 2000

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

94) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the

United States with respect to tax limitations.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the joint reso3 lution (H.J. Res. 94) proposing an amendment to the Con4 stitution of the United States with respect to tax limita5 tions. The joint resolution shall be considered as read for

6 amendment. The previous question shall be considered as

7 ordered on the joint resolution and any amendment there-
2

HRES 471 RH

1 to to final passage without intervening motion except: (1)

2 two hours of debate equally divided and controlled by the

3 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

4 on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment printed in the Con5 gressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII, if

6 offered by the Minority Leader or his designee, which shall

7 be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable

8 for one hour equally divided and controlled by the pro9 ponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit

10 with or without instructions.
House Calendar No. 203

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 471

[Report No. 106–574]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 94) proposing an amendment to theConstitution of the United States with respect totax limitations.

APRIL 11, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### [§2410l. Renumbered §4509]
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-2 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby
certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto
Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-2 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period
that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2013By:

/s/ Mark McCastlainName:

Mark McCastlainTitle:

Senior Vice President and TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2013
¿Por qué hay que reportar las estafas? Porque tu reporte puede 

ayudar a proteger a tus seres queridos. Puede ayudar a la FTC a 

clausurar a los estafadores, y puede ayudar a otras personas a evitar 

que las estafen. 

La Comisión Federal de Comercio 

consumidor.gov

Julio 2015

Producido en colaboración con el Comité Internacional de Rescate.

La Comisión Federal de Comercio (FTC, por su sigla 

en inglés) es una agencia del gobierno que protege a la 

gente de los fraudes y las estafas. 

En este manual, la FTC te enseña algunos de los signos 

de advertencia de una estafa. Cuando veas un signo de 

advertencia, para. Habla sobre el tema. Y reporta las 

estafas a la Comisión Federal de Comercio: 

1-877-382-4357 o ftc.gov/queja.
Signos de advertencia de una estafa

¿Alguien te prometió un trabajo – si le pagas? 

Nunca le pagues a nadie que te prometa un trabajo, un certificado 

que te permitirá conseguir un trabajo, o acceso secreto a un trabajo. 

Esas son estafas.

¿Te llamaron del IRS diciendo que debes dinero?

El IRS nunca llama para pedir dinero.

¿Te llamó alguna otra persona del gobierno para 

amenazarte o exigirte dinero? 

El gobierno no llama por teléfono para amenazar ni pedir dinero.

¿Vas a inscribirte en la Lotería de Visas de Diversidad 

para solicitar una Tarjeta Verde?

La solicitud es gratis y el sorteo se hace al azar. Nadie puede 

aumentar tus probabilidades de ganar.

¿Estás buscando ayuda legal para asuntos de 

inmigración? 

Trabaja con un abogado o con un representante acreditado, nunca 

con un notario.

¿Recibiste una llamada o email diciéndote que ganaste 

algo? ¿Excepto que hay un cargo?

Nunca pagues por un premio. Eso es una estafa. Perderás tu dinero.

¿Te llamó alguien para ofrecerte ayuda para recuperar 

dinero que perdiste?

Ninguna agencia del gobierno ni negocio legítimo te llamará y 

exigirá dinero para ayudarte a recuperar tu dinero.

¿Recibiste un cheque de alguien que te pidió que le 

devuelvas una parte del dinero?

Nunca le entregues dinero a nadie a cambio de un cheque. Los 

cheques falsos pueden parecer auténticos y engañarle al banco. 

Tú tendrás que devolver todo el dinero.

¿Recibiste un email, mensaje de texto o llamada 

pidiéndote tu número de tarjeta de crédito, cuenta 

bancaria o Seguro Social?

Nunca le des esa información a quien te la pida por email, mensaje 

de texto o por teléfono.

Maneras de protegerte y proteger tu 

información

• No lleves contigo todos tus papeles importantes o tarjetas 

de identificación.

• No hagas clic en los enlaces de un email a menos que estés 

seguro de qué se trata. Al hacer clic puedes instalar un 

programa malicioso en tu aparato.

• Si estás haciendo compras o presentando una solicitud de 

empleo en internet, asegúrate de que el domicilio web 

comience con las letras https. La ‘s’ significa que el sitio es 

seguro.

• Si piensas que alguien te robó tu identidad, visita 

robodeidentidad.gov donde podrás encontrar ayuda.

• Inscribe tu número de teléfono en el Registro No Llame: 

donotcall.gov.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Oil & Gas Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended January 31, 2015, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Shane
Reeves, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 31, 2017                   By: /s/ Shane Reeves
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Shane Reeves
                                            Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 212.44 Suspension of operations.

The provisions of § 211.44 of this subchapter are applicable to leases under this part.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Form10-Q") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2008                            By: /s/ Yaron Meerfeld
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Yaron Meerfeld
                                                  Acting Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.