alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006217EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 September 2006

(2006/C 217/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2731 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4608 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67955 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3285 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5822 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,47 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1875 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5763 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,287 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 276,43 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9766 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5279 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,575 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8825 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6728 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4066 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9006 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9746 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9975 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 217,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4086 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1097 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3550 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 610,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,644 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,986 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0450 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,548 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2731

JPY

Japanese yen

148,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4608

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67955

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3285

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5822

ISK

Iceland króna

89,47

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1875

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5763

CZK

Czech koruna

28,287

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

276,43

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9766

RON

Romanian leu

3,5279

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,575

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8825

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6728

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4066

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9006

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9746

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9975

KRW

South Korean won

1 217,53

ZAR

South African rand

9,4086

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1097

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3550

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 610,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,644

PHP

Philippine peso

63,986

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0450

THB

Thai baht

47,548

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 15.201 What will the agency do with the documents that I provide?

After we receive notice of the death of a person owning trust or restricted land or trust personalty, we will examine the documents provided under §§ 15.104 and 15.105, and other documents and information provided to us to prepare a complete probate file. We may consult with you and other individuals or entities to obtain additional information to complete the probate file. Then we will transfer the probate file to OHA.
H. Res. 538

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 28, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4461) making appropriations for Agriculture,

Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September

30, 2001, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. When the reading for amendment reaches title VIII,

that title shall be considered as read. Points of order against

provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of

rule XXI are waived except as follows: page 74, line 19,
2

•HRES 538 EH

through page 75, line 4; page 84, line 21, through page 96,

line 4. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
3

•HRES 538 EH

SEC. 2. House Resolution 513 is laid on the table.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 508 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 508

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3688) to amend the 
      Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require certain political 
  organizations under such Code to report information to the Federal 
              Election Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2000

 Mr. Moore (for himself, Mr. Doggett, and Mr. Stenholm) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3688) to amend the 
      Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require certain political 
  organizations under such Code to report information to the Federal 
              Election Commission, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House 
resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3688) to amend the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 to require certain political organizations under 
such Code to report information to the Federal Election Commission, and 
for other purposes. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
shall not exceed 1 hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means and 1 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 2. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the 5-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider the 
text of H.R. 4168 as an amendment in the nature of a substitute if 
offered by Representative Doggett of Texas or his designee. This 
amendment may be offered only by the named proponent or a designee and 
shall be considered as read.
    Sec. 3. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion, except one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.
    Sec. 4. If the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has 
come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day the 
House shall, immediately after the third daily order of business under 
clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for 
further consideration of the bill.
                                 <all>
```
§ 36.86 Are there staff training requirements? ( a ) All homeliving program staff as well as all employees that supervise students participating in homeliving services and activities must have the appropriate certification or licensing requirements up to date and on file. Programs must provide annual and continuous professional training and development appropriate to the certification and licensing requirements.
( b ) All homeliving program staff as well as all employees who supervise students participating in homeliving services and activities must receive annual training in the topics set out in this section before the first day of student occupancy for the year. ( 1 ) First Aid/Safety/Emergency & Crisis Preparedness;
( 2 ) CPR—Automated External Defibrillator;
( 3 ) Student Checkout Policy;
( 4 ) Confidentiality (Health Information Privacy Act and the Family Education Right to Privacy Act.);
( 5 ) Medication Administration;
( 6 ) Student Rights;
( 7 ) Child Abuse Reporting Requirements and Protection Procedures; and
( 8 ) Suicide Prevention.
( c ) Homeliving staff as well as all employees that supervise students participating in homeliving services and activities must be given the following training annually: ( 1 ) De-escalation/Conflict Resolution;
( 2 ) Substance Abuse Issues;
( 3 ) Ethics;
( 4 ) Parenting skills/Child Care;
( 5 ) Special Education and Working with Students with Disabilities;
( 6 ) Student Supervision Skills;
( 7 ) Child Development (recognizes various stages of development in the student population);
( 8 ) Basic Counseling Skills; and
( 9 ) Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP).
### Distribution of gold and other metals in silicified rocks of the Goldfield mining district, Nevada

By: Roger P. AshleyWilliam J. Keith

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp843B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (2397 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (2334 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (2324 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (2338 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 4**                            (2303 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 5**                            (2298 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 6**                            (2384 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 7**                            (2337 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 8**                            (2322 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 9**                            (2351 pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Distribution of gold and silver and other ore-related elements near ore bodies in the oxidized zone at Goldfield, Nevada(1973)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# Instructions

 Additional information or attachment  Required to describe this situation

When Data is entered and the Cell is highlighted with a blue background and a black font, additional information is needed to describe the situation.You can use fields to the right if it's related to a missing distributee being a beneficiary or a portion of the benefit attributable to non-US source income. You will need to include an attachment if it's related to Prior Payments or Employee Contributions.
https://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/form-mp400-instructions.pdf

# Schedule A

&F	Page &P of &N	&D

# Schedule B

&F	Page &P of &N	&D

Additional information or attachment Required to describe this situation

# Removed via Amendment

# image1.emf
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Conde, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 605]

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (James R. Harvey, J.), rendered September 15, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [4]). We reject the contention of defendant that County Court abused its discretion in denying his motion at sentencing seeking to withdraw his plea *(see*CPL 220.60 [3]). The assertion of innocence by defendant in support of the motion is belied by his admission of guilt during the plea colloquy *(see People v Viscomi,*286 AD2d 886, 887 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 763 [2002]). Even assuming, arguendo, that the motion to withdraw the plea preserved for our review defendant’s challenge to the factual sufficiency of the *1348plea allocution, we conclude that defendant’s contention is without merit. Defendant admitted during the plea colloquy that, while a passenger in a vehicle, he possessed the components of a firearm and ammunition, and that when assembled, the firearm was operable *(see*Penal Law § 265.00 [15]; § 265.02 [4]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, J.E, Kehoe, Martoche and Green, JJ.
§ 163.12 Harvesting restrictions. ( a ) Harvesting timber on commercial forest land will not be permitted unless provisions for natural and/or artificial reforestation of acceptable tree species is included in harvest plans.
( b ) Clearing of large contiguous areas will be permitted only on land that, when cleared, will be devoted to a more beneficial use than growing timber crops. This restriction shall not prohibit clearcutting when it is silviculturally appropriate, based on ecological principles, to harvest a particular stand of timber by such method and it otherwise conforms with objectives in § 163.3 of this part.
Order entered December 4, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01370-CV

IN RE PETER SWART, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-24538

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We LIFT the Court’s November 12, 2018 stay of all trial court proceedings.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7398

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RICHARD LEE ADAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

District Judge. (5:08-cr-00004-D-1)

Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 18, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Lee Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, 

Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Lee Adams appeals from his convictions and 

240-month sentence entered pursuant to his guilty plea. 

However, Adams has already unsuccessfully appealed his 

convictions and sentence. See United States v. Adams, No. 

09-5008 (4th Cir. Jan. 3, 2011) (unpublished). Moreover, his 

appeal is untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). 

Accordingly, we dismiss Adams’ appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 134.4 Annual payment reduced. In view of these conditions the regulations governing this matter are hereby modified so as to distribute the unaccrued installments over a period of time so that 21 ⁄ 2 percent of the total amount yet due shall be due and payable on November 15 of each year until further notice. You shall accordingly ascertain the per acre cost after deducting the amount of the accrued charges and take 21 ⁄ 2 percent of that amount and a like sum each year so that the amount of the annual installments will be the same each year. Superintendents are obligated to submit all proposed lists of sales involving allotments containing irrigable allotments to the project or supervising engineer for checking, as to the irrigable acreage and amounts of unpaid construction, operation, and maintenance charges against such allotments. Each sale forwarded to the Bureau for action shall be accompanied by contract executed on Form 5-462b where irrigable acreage is involved and after approval thereof a copy of contract on said form shall be sent to the project engineer for his records and the charges paid by the purchaser shall be turned over to the disbursing agent for credit and deposit as instructed in the next paragraph. The regulations in this part shall not apply to lands in the Wapato project, on the Yakima Indian Reservation, nor to the irrigation projects on the Blackfeet, Fort Peck, Flathead, and Crow Reservations, Montana, for which special regulations have been issued nor to the Fort Hall Reservation, Idaho, or the San Carlos project, Arizona.[1]

Cross References:
For special regulations applying to San Carlos project, see part 137 of this chapter. For further information concerning Form 5-462b, see part 159 of this chapter. Footnotes -
134.4
[1] The special regulations for Wapato, Fort Peck, and Flathead, were not codified. Operations of the Blackfeet project were discontinued by the Bureau, July 20, 1938, effective September 30, 1933.
[No. 4728.]

#### M. B. Lysight, County Assessor, and the Board of County Commissioners of Teller County, Colorado, v. The Jennie Sample Consolidated Gold Mining Company.

Former Opinion Followed.

The appeal in this action is dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the reasons set forth in Board of County Commissioners of Teller County v. Pinnacle Gold Mining Company, ante, p. 492.

*Appeal from the District Coy/rt of Teller County.*

*Hon. Robert E. Letuis, Judge.*

. Appeal by M. B. Lysigbt, as county assessor, and the board of county, commissioners of Teller county from a judgment of the district court reducing an assessment of taxes against The Jennie Sample Consolidated Gold Mining Company.

Decision *en banc.*

*Dismissed.*

Mr. C. S. Thomas and Mr. Scott Ashton, for appellants.

Mr. Justice Bailey

delivered the opinion of the court:

The appeal in this action is dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, because of the reasons set forth in *Board of County Commissioners of Teller County v. The Pinnacle Gold Mining Company.*

Decision *en banc.*

*Dismissed.*
### [§2533e. Renumbered §4875]
NOVEMBER 22, 1944

#### Ab Bacon v. The State.

No. 22864.

Delivered October 11, 1944.

Rehearing Denied (Without Written Opinion) November 22, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*W. C. Boyd, Fred H. Minor,*and *Brent C. Jackson,*all of Den-ton, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for robbery by assault, punishment, being five years in the penitentiary. The indictment charged that appellant robbed Fred Crawford of $436.00.

*606Robert Chastain was separately indicted for the same offense Appellant filed a motion for severance asking that Chastain be tried first. The motion was granted; Chastain was tried and acquitted, and appellant used him as a witness in the present trial.

Upon the trial appellant sought to prove the fact of Chastain’s acquittal. It is well established as a general rule that upon the trial of one charged with crime it is not permissible to show that another jointly or separately indicted for the same offense has been convicted or acquitted. Wharton’s Crim. Evidence, 11 Ed. Vol. 2, p. 1216, Sec. 724; 22 C. J. S., Sec. 784, p. 1334; Giles v. State, 109 Tex. Cr. R. 234, 4 S. W. (2d) 66; Bell v. State, 33 Tex. Cr. R. 163, 25 S. W. 769; Harper v. State, 11 Tex. App. 1; Walding v. State, 135 Tex. Cr. R. 430, 120 S. W. (2d) 1052. Cited in the notes under the sections in the text books will be found many cases from other jurisdictions supporting the principle announced in the Texas cases (supra).

It is not necessary to detail the facts. If the jury had accepted the evidence presented by appellant it would have resulted in an acquittal. The State’s evidence supports the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.