alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Guidance Document Database 
-  Benefit Guarantee 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Benefit guarantee

                  -  Opinion Letter 77-166
Because benefit increases became effective through collective bargaining agreements (not specific action by the Board of Trustees), PBGC looks to the adoption and effective dates of those agreements to apply the five-year phase-in rule.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 78-20
PBGC guarantees basis plan benefits only and does not guarantee the payment of non-basic plan benefits. 
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 74-28
PBGC’s plan termination insurance program covers retirees in pay status.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 76-69
Terminated, vested benefits are guaranteed when all conditions under the plan necessary to establish entitlement to the benefit at a specified age are satisfied even though participant has yet to attain retirement age on the date of plan termination.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 76-37
Discusses how the five-year phase-in rule impacts guarantee of certain recent benefit increases and that certain early retirement supplements are not guaranteed.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 83-06
Laid-off employees may accrue guaranteed benefits up to date of plan termination.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 79-07
$20 minimum in the regulation is not subject to actuarial adjustment for the participant’s age at the time the benefit started.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 81-35
Addresses the calculation of guaranteed benefits; PBGC measures benefits using plan factors at date of plan termination.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 77-162
A profit-sharing benefit in the plan is nonforfeitable and a pension benefit because the plan states it may be paid as an annuity.  Because PBGC guarantees and pays the benefit as an annuity, it won’t be paid in a lump sum if the plan is insufficient.
-               document            
 

                  -  Opinion Letter 83-09
Employees cease accruing service credit as of date of plan termination.
-               document            
 

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-   Next  
-   Last
# C_2006237EN.01000301.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 3 July 2006 — Heinrich Stefan Schneider v Land Rheinland-Pfalz

(Case C-285/06)

(2006/C 237/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Heinrich Stefan Schneider

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Rheinland-Pfalz

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 47(2)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 (1) in conjunction with the fifth indent of point (B)(1)(b) and point (B)(3) of Annex VII to that regulation and Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 to be interpreted as meaning that a particular which refers to the production or ageing method or the quality of the wine is permitted only as a regulated ‘optional particular’ in accordance with the fifth indent of point (B)(1)(b) of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 under the conditions provided for therein and in Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 (2), and not as an ‘other particular’ in accordance with point (B)(3) of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 47(2)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 (1) in conjunction with the fifth indent of point (B)(1)(b) and point (B)(3) of Annex VII to that regulation and Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 to be interpreted as meaning that a particular which refers to the production or ageing method or the quality of the wine is permitted only as a regulated ‘optional particular’ in accordance with the fifth indent of point (B)(1)(b) of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 under the conditions provided for therein and in Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 (2), and not as an ‘other particular’ in accordance with point (B)(3) of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999?

1

2

| 2. | Is Article 24(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 to be interpreted as meaning that imitation or evocation exists only if it is in the same language as that of the protected traditional term? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 24(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 to be interpreted as meaning that imitation or evocation exists only if it is in the same language as that of the protected traditional term?

| 3. | Is Article 24(2) of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 to be interpreted as meaning that the traditional terms listed in Annex III are protected only with regard to wines from the same producer Member State as the protected traditional term? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is Article 24(2) of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 to be interpreted as meaning that the traditional terms listed in Annex III are protected only with regard to wines from the same producer Member State as the protected traditional term?

---

(1)  OJ 1999 L 179, p. 1

1

(2)  OJ 2002 L 118, p. 1

2

---
### §20263. Entitlement of officers discharged or retired under this chapter to separation pay or retired pay

(a) Separation Pay.—An officer who is discharged under this chapter is entitled, if eligible therefor, to separation pay under section 1174 of this title.

(b) Retired Pay.—An officer who is retired under this chapter is entitled to retired pay computed under chapter 71 or 1223 of this title, as applicable.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1716(c), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 653.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4306]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


San Luis Trust Bank, FSB, San Luis Obispo, CA; Notice of 
Appointment of Receiver

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation as sole Receiver for San Luis Trust Bank, FSB, San Luis 
Obispo, California, (OTS No. 15051) on February 18, 2011.

    Dated: February 22, 2011.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-4306 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
#### § 48.2 What is the scope of this part?

The leasing provisions of this part apply only to facilities of schools operated by the Bureau and the fundraising provisions of this part apply only to employees of schools operated by the Bureau. This part does not apply to public schools, Public Law 100-297 Tribally controlled schools, or Public Law 93-638 contract or grant schools.
#### § 170.612 Can non-contractible functions and activities be included in contracts or agreements?

Non-contractible TTP functions and activities cannot be included in self-determination contracts, self-governance agreements, Program Agreements, or other agreements. The appendix to this subpart contains a list of TTP functions and activities that cannot be contracted.
Exhibit 13.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer for Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. 

Dated: February 26, 2016

 

|   | /s/ Sachin Shah                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Sachin Shah                            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer of its Service |
|   | Provider, BRP Energy Group L.P.        |

 

- 1 -*** ***

----
#### § 310.4 Application of mark.

All marks shall be applied to the article with a rubber stamp to be furnished by the Indian Arts and Crafts Board. Each stamp shall bear a distinctive letter and may be used only by the person to whom it has been issued. With the addition of the distinctive letter, each stamp shall read:

( )

Hand-Made

Alaskan Indian

U S

Indian Arts & Crafts Board

I D

or, in the case of articles too small to carry this stamp:

( )

U S I D

Alaskan Indian

On baskets and fabrics which offer no surface for the application of such a rubber stamp, the stamp shall be placed on a paper tag attached to the article by a wire caught in a lead seal disc that shall be impressed and made fast with a hand seal press furnished by the Indian Arts and Crafts Board.

Alaskan Eskimo
§ 542.6 Does this part apply to small and charitable gaming operations? ( a ) *Small gaming operations.* This part shall not apply to small gaming operations provided that: ( 1 ) The Tribal gaming regulatory authority permits the operation to be exempt from this part;
( 2 ) The annual gross gaming revenue of the operation does not exceed $1 million; and
( 3 ) The Tribal gaming regulatory authority develops and the operation complies with alternate procedures that: ( i ) Protect the integrity of games offered; and
( ii ) Safeguard the assets used in connection with the operation.
( b ) *Charitable gaming operations.* This part shall not apply to charitable gaming operations provided that: ( 1 ) All proceeds are for the benefit of a charitable organization;
( 2 ) The Tribal gaming regulatory authority permits the charitable organization to be exempt from this part;
( 3 ) The charitable gaming operation is operated wholly by the charitable organization's employees or volunteers;
( 4 ) The annual gross gaming revenue of the charitable gaming operation does not exceed $100,000; ( i ) Where the annual gross gaming revenues of the charitable gaming operation exceed $100,000, but are less than $1 million, paragraph (a) of this section shall also apply; and
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 5 ) The Tribal gaming regulatory authority develops and the charitable gaming operation complies with alternate procedures that: ( i ) Protect the integrity of the games offered; and
( ii ) Safeguard the assets used in connection with the gaming operation.
( c ) *Independent operators.* Nothing in this section shall exempt gaming operations conducted by independent operators for the benefit of a charitable organization.
# C_2006156EN.01000701.xml

| 5.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4062 — SKF/SNFA)

(2006/C 156/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4062. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4062. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
confidential





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that certain
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2011, by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association,
as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and
Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series
2011-C1 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in
the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement,
I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.







_______________________

Leslie Hayton

Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank









confidential
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 501 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 501

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
                   Nation's law enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2000

   Mr. Ramstad (for himself and Mr. Stupak) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                              May 15, 2000

The Committee on the Judiciary discharged; considered under suspension 
                        of the rules and adopted

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
                   Nation's law enforcement officers.

Whereas the Nation's law enforcement officers preserve and protect the safety 
        and well-being of all the citizens of this country;
Whereas approximately 740,000 men and women risk their personal safety every day 
        to fight crime and to safeguard our citizens;
Whereas peace officers are on the front line in the Nation's schools and on the 
        Nation's streets, preserving children's right to learn in schools that 
        are free of violence and citizens' right to safe communities;
Whereas 134 peace officers lost their lives in the performance of their duty in 
        1999 and a total of more than 15,000 have now made that supreme 
        sacrifice;
Whereas on average one officer dies every 54 hours and thousands of officers are 
        assaulted and injured every year; and
Whereas National Police Week 2000--May 14 to 20, 2000--provides an opportunity 
        to honor and recognize the officers who have died in the line of duty 
        and to affirm the Nation's thanks to the officers who put their lives on 
        the line on a daily basis to protect our citizens: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) all peace officers slain in the line of duty and all 
        peace officers who risk their own personal safety and well-
        being to protect this Nation's citizens should be honored and 
        recognized; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling upon 
        the people of the United States to honor and recognize slain 
        peace officers with appropriate ceremonies and respect and to 
        honor and recognize the sacrifices and risks taken daily by all 
        peace officers.
                                 <all>
```
### [§2796. Renumbered §455]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4400]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 2, 2011; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: 

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: February 22, 2011.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4400 Filed 2-23-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
# C_2006237EN.01002101.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/21

---

Action brought 11 August 2006 — Nolin v Commission

(Case F-91/06)

(2006/C 237/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Michel Nolin (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the appeal assessor's decision, of 8 April 2006, setting out the applicant's Career Progress Report (CPR) for the 2005 assessment exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the appeal assessor's decision, of 8 April 2006, setting out the applicant's Career Progress Report (CPR) for the 2005 assessment exercise;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant claims that the defendant erred in law, in as far as some essential tasks and points relating to his work were not mentioned by the assessor and no comments on those tasks are made in his CPR. That situation is due to serious inconsistencies and inadequacies comparable to manifest errors of fact in the consideration of the factors relevant to his assessment.

Furthermore, the applicant considers that, despite the two changes made by the assessor in his comments as compared with the 2003 reference exercise, the applicant's report from the previous year was repeated, in breach of Article 5 of the general provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations, whilst significant changes in the applicant's functions had taken place and the repetition of the previous year's report had taken place without the applicant's consent.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0477

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RYAN M. HILL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court 

Reporter Ann M. Allen is granted an extension of time to and including 

January 12, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

transcripts requested on appeal.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 12 2022

12/12/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0477
§ 36.30 Standard X—Grading requirements. ( a ) Each school shall implement a uniform grading system which assesses a student's mastery of the prescribed objectives of the courses of study undertaken. The mastery of prescribed course objectives shall be the primary measure of academic attainment for reporting student grades on report cards.
( b ) The information derived from student instructional evaluations shall be shared with the student and with the parents and shall be used to give teachers and students direction for subsequent learning activities.
( c ) Parent/teacher and parent/teacher/student conferences focused on the student's instructional progress and development shall be held, where feasible and practical, to provide an additional means of communication between home and school. Residential schools may meet this standard by documenting the communication of student grades on report cards to parents.
( d ) Each school shall issue a report card to parents of students who are under the age of eighteen (18) and to students eighteen (18) years of age and older on a regular basis, but not less than four (4) times yearly. The report card shall include, but not be limited to, the following sections: ( 1 ) Recommendations and probable promotion status;
( 2 ) Appropriate signatures and request for return of report cards; and
( 3 ) Student attendance record.
( e ) A summary of each year's final card shall become part of the student's permanent school record.