alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006224EN.01003303.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/33

---

Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 16 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-355/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 224/69)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

1

---
To: John Cymbalsky, Supervisor, Appliance Standards Building Technologies Program, 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy

From: Jennifer Hatfield, Director, Government Affairs, Association of Pool & Spa 

Professionals

Date: July 23, 2015

CC: Steven Getzoff, outside legal counsel APSP

Re: Docket # EERE-2015-BT-STD-0008: Request for Information (RFI) issued by the 

Department of Energy (DOE) pertaining to the development of potential Energy 

Conservation Standards for Dedicated Purpose Pool Pumps.

On July 16, 2015 at approximately 2:00 pm, representatives of the Association of Pool and 

Spa Professionals (APSP) and its membership met with John Cymbalsky, Supervisor, 

Appliance Standards Building Technologies Program, to discuss the above RFI. Attending 

on behalf of the APSP and its membership were Steven Getzoff, outside national counsel to 

APSP, Carl Chidlow, Government Affairs consultant, Jeff Farlow of Pentair Aquatic 

Systems and Scott Petty of Hayward Industries. Also participating by phone were Allison 

Williams of LB&L and Daniel Weintraub’ of Navigant. 

The APSP group expressed their support for the Department’s efforts, expressed interest in a 

Negotiated Rulemaking, and informed the Department of its intent to join with the 

California Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) in submitting a letter requesting same and the 

formation of a Formal Work Group. 

The APSP group provided Mr. Cymbalsky with a copy of the ANSI/APSP-15 American 

National Standard for Residential Swimming Pool Energy Efficiency, and also noted the 

existence of the APSP Pool Pump database, which lists those products that are represented 

as complying with the Standard and with California Titles 20 & 24. It was noted that there 

are numerous pumps sold elsewhere which do not comply and are therefore not listed. 

The parties also discussed Energy Star provisions, the need for testing, efforts by APSP to 

identify and gather market based and other data and the timing of the rulemaking process. 

The meeting lasted approximately 30 minutes.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, April 7, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Project Committee will be held Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 2 p.m., Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information, please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: February 18, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-4307 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Jeremiah O’Leary and Patrick O’Leary, Respondents, v. Horace H. Hubbell, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. ■ No opinion. "
### §9225. Rank: warrant officers

Warrant officers rank next below second lieutenants and rank among themselves within each warrant officer grade under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 530, §8575; renumbered §9225, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8575 | 10:593 (less 1st sentence). | Aug. 21, 1941, ch. 384, §4 (less 1st sentence), 55 Stat. 653; May 29, 1954, ch. 249, §19(e), 68 Stat. 167. |

10:593 (2d sentence) is omitted as executed. The words "within each warrant officer grade" are inserted for clarity, since section 745 of this title covers rank between warrant officers in different warrant officer grades. The words "they shall take precedence" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8575 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          48,374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                       240
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,705
<PP&E>                                           5,971
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,583
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,520
<SALES>                                         23,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,953
<CGS>                                            1,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 232 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 30, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 791) to amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route 
of the War of 1812 British invasion of Maryland and Washington, District of 
Columbia, and the route of the American defense, for study for potential 
addition to the national trails system. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in 
order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the 
bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 
minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any 
amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
STATE OF MICIIIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

LANSING 

DE~ RICK SNYDER 

GOVERNOR 

September 5, 2012 

VIA U.S. MAIL AND ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION 

Docket ID. EPA-R05-0AR-2010-0954 

Ms. Pamela Blakley, Chief 

Control Strategies Section 

Air Programs Branch (AR-18J) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Dear Ms. Blakley, 

DAN WYANT 

DIRECTOR 

SUBJECT: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan; 

Regional Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan 

for Regional Haze; Proposed Rule 

The U.S. Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to 

mandate best available retrofit technology (BART) for two sources in Michigan to meet 

Regional Haze visibility goals. This proposed FIP accompanies a proposed limited 

disapproval of Michigan's Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal due 

to a determination that Michigan's BART analyses are deficient for St. Mary's Cement in 

Charlevoix and New Page Paper in Escanaba. 

The Section 169 visibility provision of the federal Clean Air Act clearly places the 

regulatory responsibilities for visibility and the analysis of BART for sources on states. 

Additionally, the August 21, 2012 decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit on 

the Cross State Air Pollution Rule emphasizes that a FIP-first process is not in 

accordance with the Act. Section 110(c)(1) of the Act authorizes the EPA to promulgate 

a FIP within two years after making a finding that the state's submittal does not satisfy 

the minimum criteria. However, in proposing a FIP simultaneously with a proposed 

disapproval, the EPA is circumventing the process laid out in the Act by not giving the 

state the opportunity to correct the identified deficiencies in Michigan's BART SIP 

revision. 

The Air Quality Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) 

acknowledges that differences over appropriate technology applications have led to the 

proposal for limited disapproval, but strongly objects to this FIP-first approach, which 

usurps the state's prerogative to address the deficiencies laid out in the limited 

disapproval in its SIP. 

CONSTITUTION HALL • 525 WEST ALLEGAN STREET • P.O. BOX 30473 •LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909-7973 

www.mfchigan.gov/deq • (800) 662-9278 
Ms. Pamela Blakley 

Page 2 

September 5, 2012 

Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact 

me at the number listed below. 

·~;j;~£~/- Mr. G. Vinson Hellwig / 

Air Quality Division 

517-373-7069 

Cc. Mr. Charles Hatten, EPA, Region 5 

Mr. Jim Sygo, MDEQ 

Mr. Robert Irvine, MDEQ
### [§2212. Renumbered §3138]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2212, added Pub. L. 100–370, §1(d)(2)(A), July 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 842, directed Secretary of Defense to maintain within each military department an accounting procedure to aid in identification and control of expenditures for contracted advisory and assistance services, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2454(c)(1), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3326.

Another prior section 2212, added Pub. L. 95–356, title VIII, §802(a)(1), Sept. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 585; amended Pub. L. 97–258, §3(b)(5), Sept. 18, 1982, 96 Stat. 1063, related to transmission of annual military construction authorization request, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–214, §7(1), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 173, eff. Oct. 1, 1982, applicable to military construction projects, and to construction and acquisition of military family housing authorized before, on, or after such date. See section 2859 of this title.
### [§§2512, 2513. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1081(f), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 454]

Section 2512, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4222(a), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2679; amended Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XIII, §1315(b), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1787; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XI, §1115(b), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2868, related to commercial-military integration partnerships.

A prior section 2512, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §823(a)(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1600, related to responsibility of Secretary of Defense to provide management and planning, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–484, §4202(a).

Section 2513, added Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §821(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1428, §2524; renumbered §2513 and amended Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4223(a)–(f), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2681; Pub. L. 103–35, title II, §201(d)(3), (e)(1), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 99; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XI, §1182(g)(2), title XIII, §§1315(c), 1316, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1774, 1787, 1789; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XI, §1115(c), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2868, related to regional technology alliances assistance program.

A prior section 2513, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §823(a)(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1601; amended Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title II, §203(c), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1314, required annual National Defense Manufacturing Technology Plan, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–484, §4202(a).
#### KEPLEY v. KEPLEY

No. 159P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 508

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.
### [§2161. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LIII, §5324(e)(1), formerly §5324(g)(1), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2137, renumbered §5324(e)(1), Pub. L. 116–260, div. W, title III, §305(c)(3), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2367]

Section, added Pub. L. 96–450, title IV, §406(a), Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 1980; amended Pub. L. 105–107, title V, §501(a), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2261; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, §543(a)(1), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4456; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title IX, §922(a), (b)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1879, related to degree granting authority for the National Intelligence University.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the date on which the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence jointly submit the joint certifications required under section 3334a(b)(1) of Title 50, War and National Defense, see section 3334a(e)(2) of Title 50.
Order filed July 6, 2021. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00297-CV

____________

MICHAEL G. CHAPA, Appellant

V.

AURA CECILIA CHAPA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-55125

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 28, 2021. To date, the filing 

fee of $205.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute 

or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 5. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $205.00 to the 

clerk of this court on or before July 21, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant 

fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.
### §1748. Fulfillment standards for acquisition workforce training

The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall develop fulfillment standards, and implement and maintain a program, for purposes of the training requirements of sections 1723, 1724, and 1735 of this title. Such fulfillment standards shall consist of criteria for determining whether an individual has demonstrated competence in the areas that would be taught in the training courses required under those sections. If an individual meets the appropriate fulfillment standard, the applicable training requirement is fulfilled.

(Added Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, §874(b)(1), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4304; amended Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, §902(24), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1545.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VIII, §853, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1851, which was set out as a note under section 1723 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 111–383, §874(b)(4).

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–92 substituted "Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment" for "Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Deadline for Fulfillment Standards

Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, §874(b)(3), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4305, provided that: "The fulfillment standards required under section 1748 of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall be developed not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 7, 2011]."
Exhibit 35.3










ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C1

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of May 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among, UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special
Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Trimont
Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects during the reporting period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2016