T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P HI L I P KU O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72100 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 663- 282 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t10, 2010 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , H A W K IN S , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P hi l i p K uo, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M a l a y s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED AU G 31 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72100 2 j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al evi dence fa ctual f in d in g s , I N S v . E l i as - Zac ar i as , 502 U . S . 478, 481 & n. 1 ( 1992) , a nd w e de nythe p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . Su b s t a n t i a l e v i d e n c e s up p o rt s th e BI A ’ s d e t e rmi n a t i o n th a tth e v a n d a l i s m, c ur s e s , a nd othe rha r a s s m e ntK uo s uf f e r e d i n M a l a y s i adi d notr i s e t o the l e ve l of p e r s e c u tio n . Se e Na g o u lko v . I NS , 333 F . 3d 1012, 1016- 18 ( 9th C i r . 2003) (i n ci d en t s o f d i scri m i n at i o n an dh arassm en td o n o tco m p el a fi n d i n g o f p ast pers ec ut i on ). S ub st ant i alevi dence al so supp ort s the B IA ’ s f i nd i ng thatK uo fa i l ed t o de m ons tr a t e aw e l l - f

ounde d f e a rof f utur e pe r s e c ut i on be c aus e i ti s t oo spec ul at i ve t o ass um e thathe w i l l be pers ec ut ed as a r es ul tof hi s C hri st i an r e lig io n . Se e id . a t 1 0 1 8 ( r e c o r de v id e n c e d idn o t s h o w p e titio n e rh a do b je c tiv e ly r e a s o n ab le b a s is f

o rf u tu r e f e a r ) ; s e e a l

s o Mo l i n a - Es tr a da v . I

NS , 293 F . 3d 1089, 1096 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( a ge nc yi s e nt i t l e d t o r e l yon a l l r e l e va nte vi de nc e i n the re co rd , i n clu d in g S tate D ep ar tm en t rep o rts, in co n sid er in g w h eth era p etit io n er ’s f e a rof f utur e pe r s e c ut i on i s obj e c t i ve l yr e a s onabl e ) . A c c or di ngl y , K uo’ s a s y l um c la im f a ils . B e c au s e Ku o d i dn o te s t ab l i s h e l i g i b i l i tyf o ra s y l u m , i tn e c e s s a r i l yf o l l o ws th a t h e d idn o t s a tis f

yth e m o r e s tr in g e n t s ta n d a r df o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See Zehat ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ).09- 72100 3 F i nal l y, subst ant i al evi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s deni al of C A T re l i ef be c aus e K uo f

a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e tha ti tw a s m or e l i ke l ytha n nothe w oul d be to rtu r e d . See W

akkaryv. H

older , 55 8 F . 3d 10 49 , 10 68 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( pet i t i on er fa i l ed t o p rovi de evi dence “ thathe i s l i kel y t o b e t ortured by the ac t ors he f ears ”) . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .