alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 6, 2011, Johnson 
Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials Inc., Pharmaceutical Service, 25 
Patton Road, Devens, Massachusetts 01434, made application by renewal 
to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Nabilone (7379)............................  II
Alfentanil (9737)..........................  II
Sufentanil (9740)..........................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to utilize this facility to manufacture small 
quantities of the listed controlled substances in bulk and to conduct 
analytical testing in support of the company's primary manufacturing 
facility in West Deptford, New Jersey. The controlled substances 
manufactured in bulk at this facility will be distributed to the 
company's customers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than April 25, 2011.

    Dated: February 15, 2011.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-3928 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### In the Matter of Tasharka Sargent, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 751]

for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules denied, the cross motion granted and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. All concur. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Friedman, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Fama, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 686]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 6, 1995 *(People v Fama,*212 AD2d 542 [1995]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 11, 1990.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 *597US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
# Tables for Reg

# Backup
### Geologic structures in the Gulf of Mexico basin

By: L. E. GarrisonRay G. Martin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp773

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 491 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 15, 2000.
Whereas former Representative G.V. ``Sonny'' Montgomery of Mississippi, from the 
        time of his election to the House of Representatives in 1967 and his 
        beyond his retirement in 1996 through the present day, has faithfully 
        and continuously facilitated the ``House of Representatives Prayer 
        Breakfast'' at 8 a.m. every Thursday morning in Room H-130 in the House 
        of Representatives wing of the Capitol with a dedication that is 
        indelibly etched in the memories of the many Members who have attended 
        that weekly event: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the room numbered H-130 in the House of Representatives wing 
of the Capitol is named in honor of former Representative G.V. ``Sonny'' 
Montgomery.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 3.4

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED

BYLAWS OF CARLYLE GMS FINANCE. INC.

The
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. (the Bylaws) are hereby amended as follows:



| |  | Every reference in the Bylaws to the name Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. is hereby deleted and replaced by TCG BDC, Inc.
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Except as herein amended, the provisions of the Bylaws shall remain in full force and effect.

Effective as of March 15, 2017.
### [§190. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title VIII, §810(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1487]

Section, added Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, §820(b)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2274; amended Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII, §804, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1456, related to Defense Cost Accounting Standards Board.
---

CONSENT OF ERIC OLIN

I hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, of references to my name and to the use of the technical report
titled NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment, Ambler Project, Kobuk, AK
dated effective February 1, 2012 (the Technical Report).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in NovaCopper
Inc.s Registration Statement (No. 333-185127) on Form S-3 and Registration
Statement (No. 333-181020) on Form S-8, of references to my name and to the use
of the Technical Report, which is included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K.

|DATED: February
      12, 2013 | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Eric Olin                  | 
|Name: Eric Olin                | 

---
From: Howard L. Gilberg [mailto:Gilberg@guidaslavichflores.com]

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 4:33 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Cc: Tsirigotis, Peter; Ginsburg, Eric; Fruh, Steve; Barnett, Keith; Jordan, Scott; Connie O'Neal; Eric

Astrachan; Robert Hurt; Steve Wiederwax; Steve Willis; Tim Swaw

Subject: FW: Clay Ceramics Manufacturing: Proposed Subcategorization of Wall Tile Production

Sharon:

Please see the attached presentation supporting the TCNA’s request for subcategorization of wall tile

production from f loor tile production.

If you or your colleagues have any questions, please contact me.

Thank you in advance for your close evaluation of this request.

Howard

Howard L. Gilberg

Guida, Slavich & Flores, P.C.

750 North St. Paul Street, Suite 200

Dallas, TX 75201

214.692

- 0009

- phone

214.692

- 6610

- fax

gilberg@gsfpc.com

www.theenvironmentallawfirm.com

From: Pervenia P. Brown [mailto:Brown@guidaslavichflores.com]

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 3:31 PM

To: Howard L. Gilberg

Subject: Clay Ceramics Manufacturing Subcategorization of Wall Tile

Attached.

Pervenia P. Brown

Legal Secretary to Howard L. Gilberg,

Tonya L. Meier, Michael R. Goldman

and David E. Whitten

GUIDA, SLAVICH & FLORES, P.C.

750 North St. Paul Street, Suite 200

Dallas, TX 75201

(ofc): 214.692.0009 Ext. 157

(fax): 214.692.6610

brown@gsfpc.com

www.gsfpc.comThis message, as well as any attached document, contains information that is confidential and/or

privileged, or may contain attorney work product. Th e information is intended only for the use of the

addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any

disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message or

i ts attachments is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error,

please delete all electronic copies of this message and its attachments, if any, destroy any hard copies

you may have created, without disclosing the c ontents, and notify the sender immediately. Unintended

transmission does not constitute waiver of the attorney

- client privilege or any other privilege. Unless

expressly stated otherwise, nothing contained in this message should be construed as a digital or

electronic signature, nor is it intended to reflect an intention to make an agreement by electronic

means.
#### In the Matter of Vivian OO., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. James OO., Appellant; Tompkins County Department of Social Services, Respondent. In the Matter of Vivian OO., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Claire OO., Appellant; Tompkins County Department of Social Services, Respondent. (And Two Other Related Proceedings.)

[826 NYS2d 762]

Rose, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tompkins County (Rowley, J.), entered August 31, 2004, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioners’ applications, in four proceedings pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to terminate placement of the subject child.

Petitioners’ child, born in 2001, was adjudicated as neglected and placed in respondent’s care in February 2002. This placement was extended in January 2003 with petitioners’ consent. Later in 2003, petitioners separately petitioned for termination of the child’s placement. Respondent ultimately cross-petitioned for continued placement and, in other proceedings based upon subsequent events, sought termination of petitioners’ parental rights. Following a hearing as to placement, Family Court granted respondent’s application for an extension, prompting the current appeals by petitioners. Since that time, however, not only did the order extending placement expire, but the parental rights of both petitioners were terminated by a Family Court order entered November 3, 2005. This Court has now *1085reviewed and affirmed that order as to the father *(Matter of Vivian OO.,*33 AD3d 1096 [2006]) and as to the mother *(Matter of Vivian OO.,*34 AD3d 1111 [2006] [decided herewith]). As a result, petitioners’ appeal from the order extending placement is moot (see *Matter of Norbert YY.,*28 AD3d 815, 816 [2006]; *Matter of Senator NN.,*21 AD3d 1187, 1188 [2005]; *Matter of Natasha F.,*15 AD3d 788, 789 [2005]). Also, we are unpersuaded that an exception to the mootness doctrine has been demonstrated by the father (see *Matter of Norbert YY., supra).*

Carpinello, J.E, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
cc: J. Benjamin Odoms 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I 947A 

2 

I
§ 293.2 How are key terms defined in this part? This part relies on but does not restate all defined terms set forth in the definitional section of IGRA. ( a ) *Amendment* means: ( 1 ) A change to a class III Tribal-State gaming compact other than an extension, or
( 2 ) A change to secretarial procedures prescribed under 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(7)(B)(vii) when such change is agreed upon by the Tribe and State.
( b ) Compact or Tribal-State Gaming Compact means an intergovernmental agreement executed between Tribal and State governments under IGRA that establishes between the parties the terms and conditions for the operation and regulation of the Tribe's class III gaming activities.
( c ) *Extension* means an intergovernmental agreement executed between Tribal and State governments under IGRA to change the duration of a compact or amendment.
( d ) Gaming activity or gaming activities means the conduct of class III gaming involving the three required elements of chance, consideration, and prize or reward.
( e ) *Gaming facility* means the physical building or structure situated on Indian lands where the gaming activity occurs.
( f ) *Gaming spaces* means the areas within a gaming facility (as defined in paragraph (e) of this section) that are directly related to and necessary for the conduct of class III gaming such as: the casino floor; vault; count room; surveillance, management, and information technology areas; class III gaming device and supplies storage areas; and other secured areas where the operation or management of class III gaming takes place.
( g ) *IGRA* means the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-497) 102 Stat. 2467 dated October 17, 1988, (Codified at 25 U.S.C. 2701-2721 (1988)) and any amendments.
( h ) *Meaningful concession* means: ( 1 ) Something of value to the Tribe;
( 2 ) Directly related to gaming activity;
( 3 ) Something that carries out the purposes of IGRA; and
( 4 ) Not a subject over which a State is otherwise obligated to negotiate under IGRA.
( i ) *Substantial economic benefit* means: ( 1 ) A beneficial impact to the Tribe;
( 2 ) Resulting from a meaningful concession;
( 3 ) Made with a Tribe's economic circumstances in mind;
( 4 ) Spans the life of the compact; and
( 5 ) Demonstrated by an economic/market analysis or similar documentation submitted by the Tribe or the State.
( j ) *Tribe* means Indian Tribe as defined in 25 U.S.C. 2703(5).
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 8777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3405]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 8, 2010 and published in the Federal 
Register on October 20, 2010, 75 FR 64744, GE Healthcare, 3350 North 
Ridge Avenue, Arlington Heights, Illinois 60004-1412, made application 
by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be 
registered as a bulk manufacturer of Cocaine (9041), a basic class of 
controlled substance.
    The company plans to manufacture a radioactive product used in 
diagnostic imaging in the diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease and for 
manufacture in bulk for investigational new drug (IND) submission and 
clinical trials.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
GE Healthcare to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated GE Healthcare to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above 
named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: February 4, 2011.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-3405 Filed 2-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,890]


Ohio Decorative Products, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers 
From Custom Staffing, Spencerville, OH; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on January 7, 2011, applicable to workers of Ohio Decorative Products, 
Inc., Spencerville, Ohio. The workers are engaged in employment related 
to the production of decorative metal products for appliances. The 
Notice was published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2011 (76 FR 
4728).
    At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The subject firm reports 
that the workers leased from Custom Staffing were employed on-site at 
the Spencerville, Ohio location of Ohio Decorative Products, Inc. The 
Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under 
the control of Ohio Decorative Products, Inc. to be considered leased 
workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Custom Staffing working 
on-site at the Spencerville, Ohio location of Ohio Decorative Products, 
Inc.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,890 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Ohio Decorative Products, Inc., including on-site 
leased workers from Custom Staffing, Spencerville, Ohio, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 
11, 2009, through January 7, 2013, and all workers in the group 
threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the 
date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 10th day of February, 2011.
 Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-4100 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Oilfield Contractors, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*United Cities Gas Company, Defendant-Appellant.

Fifth District

No. 75-307

Opinion filed January 13, 1976.

— Rehearing denied February 23, 1976.

Deneen A. Watson, Ltd., of Harrisburg (Deneen A. Watson, of counsel), for appellant.

Robert H. Rath, of Harrisburg, for appellee.

*291Mr. JUSTICE CARTER

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff-appellee, Oilfield Contractors, Inc., filed a four-count complaint against defendants Shawnee Petroleum Co., Leroy A. Perrot, and United Cities Gas Co., the only defendant appealing. The trial court after a two day hearing announced on September 18, 1974 that it was awarding damages to the plaintiff against United Cities Gas Co. on counts I and IV of its complaint. Judgment was entered on September 18, 1974, and the appropriate order was filed on October 23, 1974,

The order denying defendant United Cities Gas Co. post-trial motions with respect to .the order of September 18, 1974, was filed May 28, 1975. This order recites that the parties had stipulated that the portion of the judgment pertaining to relief accorded plaintiff under Count I of the complaint be stricken. Count I was against defendants United Cities Gas Co. and Shawnee Petroleum Co. for an accounting for proceeds for proceeds for gas paid by United Cities Gas Co. to the Shawnee Petroleum Co. for a certain period.

Docket entries dated September 17, 1974, indicate that the defendants Leroy A. Perrott and Shawnee Petroleum Co. were not served with summons. However, in the record, there is a return of the summons served on Shawnee Petroleum Co., but no appearance was filed. Thus the record is void as to any action taken on Count II of plaintiff’s complaint with regard to Shawnee Petroleüm Co. There is no question that defendant Leroy Perrott was never served. Accordingly, the trial court should have entered an order dismissing Count III of the complaint, which was against Perrott.

Illinois Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A § 304(a)) provides that judgments determining fewer than all of the matters involved in an action shall not be appealable unless the trial court makes an express written finding that there is no just reason for delaying enforcement or appeal.

A review of the record reveals the absence of the entry of an order disposing of Counts II and III of the plaintiff’s complaint as well as the lack of a written finding contemplated by the above-mentioned Supreme Court Rule. Consequently, the judgment is not appealable. *Rubinson v. Pancoe,*54 Ill.App.2d 224.

Appeal dismissed.

JONES and G. J. MORAN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32



Section 906 Certification



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Host Marriott Corporation, the sole general
partner of Host Marriott, L.P., (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Host Marriott, L.P. (the Company) for the period ended March 25, 2005 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 3, 2005



/s/ Christopher J. NassettaChristopher J. NassettaChief Executive Officer of Host Marriott Corporation/s/ W. Edward WalterW. Edward WalterChief Financial Officer of Host Marriott Corporation




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.