alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# U.S. Provides Bednets and Equipment Worth $160,486 to Lao PDR for Malaria Prevention 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### § 256.18 Who decides what work will be done?

The servicing housing office will determine what work is to be done on your house or whether your house will be replaced. The servicing housing office also provides the priority list annually to the Indian Health Service if the Indian Health Service is responsible for verifying availability or feasibility of water and wastewater facilities.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00928**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 00928\000928_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00928\00928_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 00928\00928_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 00928\00928_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00928\00928_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00928\00928_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00928\00928_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00928\00928_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00928\Certification Statement_00928.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 00928\Supplemental Documents\00928_Gaston Section 2_3 Copy 5 Question 2-31 AB Dry Ash Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 00928\Supplemental Documents\00928_Gaston Section 2_3 Copy 5 Question 2-31 Storage Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 00928\Supplemental Documents\00928_Gaston Section 2_3 Copy 5 Question 2-31 CD Dry Ash Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00928\Supplemental Documents\00928_Gaston Water Balance - WB1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00928\Supplemental Documents\00928_ICR A12 CBI Gaston WET ESP Pilot Report .pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 

### 00928\Supplemental Documents\ICR-Plant-EC Gaston - Aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
### §8038. Director for Expeditionary Warfare

(a) One of the Directors within the office of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations with responsibility for warfare requirements and programs shall be the Director for Expeditionary Warfare who shall be detailed from officers on the active-duty list of the Marine Corps.

(b) The principal duty of the Director for Expeditionary Warfare shall be to supervise the performance of all staff responsibilities of the Chief of Naval Operations regarding expeditionary warfare, including responsibilities regarding amphibious lift, mine warfare, naval fire support, and other missions essential to supporting expeditionary warfare.

(c) The Chief of Naval Operations shall transfer duties, responsibilities, and staff from other personnel within the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations as necessary to fully support the Director for Expeditionary Warfare.

(Added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title IX, §935(b)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2478, §5038; amended Pub. L. 103–35, title II, §201(c)(10), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 98; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, §944, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1737; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title IX, §932, Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1200; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(w), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2104; renumbered §8038, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 8038 to 8040 were renumbered sections 9038 to 9040 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5038 of this title as this section.

2016—Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 114–328 redesignated subsecs. (c) and (d) as (b) and (c), respectively, and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "An officer assigned to the position of Director for Expeditionary Warfare, while so serving, has the grade of major general."

2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–107 substituted "office of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations with responsibility for warfare requirements and programs" for "Office of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Resources, Warfare Requirements, and Assessments".

1993—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 103–160 struck out subsec. (e) which read as follows: "This section shall cease to apply on November 1, 1997."

Pub. L. 103–35 substituted "section" for "subsection".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §344. Self-incrimination; immunity

Immunity for persons required to submit to examination, to testify, or to provide information in a case under this title may be granted under part V of title 18.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2565.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

Part V [§6001 et seq.] of title 18 of the United States Code governs the granting of immunity to witnesses before Federal tribunals. The immunity provided under part V is only use immunity, not transactional immunity. Part V applies to all proceedings before Federal courts, before Federal grand juries, before administrative agencies, and before Congressional committees. It requires the Attorney General or the U. S. attorney to request or to approve any grant of immunity, whether before a court, grand jury, agency, or congressional committee.

This section carries part V over into bankruptcy cases. Thus, for a witness to be ordered to testify before a bankruptcy court in spite of a claim of privilege, the U. S. attorney for the district in which the court sits would have to request from the district court for that district the immunity order. The rule would apply to both debtors, creditors, and any other witnesses in a bankruptcy case. If the immunity were granted, the witness would be required to testify. If not, he could claim the privilege against self-incrimination.

Part V is a significant departure from current law. Under section 7a(10) of the Bankruptcy Act [section 25(a)(10) of former title 11], a debtor is required to testify in all circumstances, but any testimony he gives may not be used against him in any criminal proceeding, except testimony given in any hearing on objections to discharge. With that exception, section 7a(10) amounts to a blanket grant of use immunity to all debtors. Immunity for other witnesses in bankruptcy courts today is governed by part V of title 18.

The consequences of a claim of privileges by a debtor under proposed law and under current law differ as well. Under section 14c(6) of current law [section 32(c)(6) of former title 11], any refusal to answer a material question approved by the court will result in the denial of a discharge, even if the refusal is based on the privilege against self incrimination. Thus, the debtor is confronted with the choice between losing his discharge and opening himself up to possible criminal prosecution.

Under section 727(a)(6) of the proposed title 11, a debtor is only denied a discharge if he refuses to testify after having been granted immunity. If the debtor claims the privilege and the U. S. attorney does not request immunity from the district courts, then the debtor may refuse to testify and still retain his right to a discharge. It removes the Scylla and Charibdis choice for debtors that exists under the Bankruptcy Act [former title 11].
#### § 304.1 Penalties for imitation or unauthorized use.

The use of Government trade-marks in an unauthorized manner, or the colorable imitation of such marks, is subject to the criminal penalties imposed by section 5 of the said act (49 Stat. 892; 25 U.S.C. 305d).
Order entered March 8, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00760-CR

MARCUS DEWAYNE WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-75985-I

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s March 5, 2019 second motion to extend the time to file its 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State’s brief filed on or before April 4, 2019. If 

the State’s brief is not filed by April 4, 2019, this appeal may be submitted without the State’s 

brief.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 30 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 2, 1999.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Government Reform: Mr. Doolittle and Mrs. Chenoweth.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Bachus.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Sanford and Mr. Metcalf.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Pease, Mr. Thune, and Mrs. Bono.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Bereuter, Mr. 
Kuykendall, and Mr. Simpson.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Hansen, Mr. McKeon, and Mr. Gibbons; all 
to rank in the named order following Mr. LaHood.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Priest *v.*Herring.

[No. 12,399.

Filed November 5, 1925.]

From LaPorte Circuit Court; *John C. Richter,*Judge.

Action between William Priest and Julius J. Herring. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*Fred R. Leddell,*for appellant.

*Bruce B. Boring'*and *Sallwasser & Sallwasser,*for appellee.

Remy, C. J.

Affirmed on authority of *Rook*v. *Straus Bros. Co.*(1916), 60 Ind. App. 381, 110 N. E. 1006.
# C_2006237EN.01001202.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/12

---

Action brought on 16 August 2006 — Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) v OHIM — Eurim-Pharm Arzneimittel (Neurim PHARMACEUTICALS)

(Case T-218/06)

(2006/C 237/22)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd (Tel Aviv, Israel) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eurim-Pharm Arzneimittel GmbH

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Forms of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade, Marks and Designs) of 2 June 2006 — Appeal number R 74/2006-1 — in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade, Marks and Designs) of 2 June 2006 — Appeal number R 74/2006-1 — in its entirety;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Neurim PHARMACEUTICALS’ for goods in Classes 5 and 10.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Eurim-Pharm Arzneimittel GmbH.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘EURIM-PHARM’ (Community trade mark No 667 899 and national mark) and the trade mark right for ‘Eurim-Pharm GmbH’ for goods in Class 5.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Grant of the opposition and refusal of the application.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal as inadmissible.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) and Rules 48, 49 and 96 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (2), infringement of Article 78 and Article 78a of Regulation No 40/94 and infringement of the principle by which OHIM is bound by its own decisions and the principle of proportionality.

Pleas in law:

1

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1).

2

---
WF(1)ORISPL:N/ABoiler ID:Unit 2Plant:SJGSUtility:N/AThe following combinations of control technologies may be used on wall fired boilers.Click on the button to the right of a particular combination to see detailed results.Primary ControlTechnologyCostEffectivenessSecondary ControlTechnologyCostEffectivenessTotal CostEffectivenessNew EmissionRateLNB $556 none - $556 0.20LNB with Overfire Air $638 none - $638 0.16Gas Reburn $1,375 none - $1,375 0.18SCR (70-80%) $1,884 none - $1,884 0.10LNB $556 Gas Reburn $2,059 $1,226 0.12LNB with Overfire Air $638 Gas Reburn $2,689 $1,267 0.09LNB $556 SCR (70%) $3,756 $2,162 0.10LNB with Overfire Air $638 SCR (70%) $6,142 $2,327 0.10Gas Reburn $1,375 SCR (70%) $4,711 $2,709 0.10LNB $556 SNCR (40%) $2,598 $1,466 0.12LNB with Overfire Air $638 SNCR (40%) $3,393 $1,483 0.10Gas Reburn $1,375 SNCR (40%) $2,892 $1,944 0.11Click on the buttons below to see the cost effectiveness of each combination as a function of capacity factoror uncontrolled NOx rate.Page 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 471 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 12, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 94) proposing an amendment 
to the Constitution of the United States with respect to tax limitations. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two 
hours of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment printed in 
the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII, if offered by the 
Minority Leader or his designee, which shall be considered as read, and shall be 
separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2006223EN.01000101.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 September 2006

(2006/C 223/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2675 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4606 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67390 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2250 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5946 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,28 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2775 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5764 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,485 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,53 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9504 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5062 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,388 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8666 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6853 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4203 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8642 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9248 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0046 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 211,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3910 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0678 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4348 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 559,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,653 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,654 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9470 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,225 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2675

JPY

Japanese yen

149,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4606

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67390

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2250

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5946

ISK

Iceland króna

89,28

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2775

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5764

CZK

Czech koruna

28,485

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,53

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9504

RON

Romanian leu

3,5062

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,388

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8666

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6853

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4203

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8642

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9248

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0046

KRW

South Korean won

1 211,98

ZAR

South African rand

9,3910

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0678

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4348

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 559,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,653

PHP

Philippine peso

63,654

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9470

THB

Thai baht

47,225

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IV

House Calendar No. 5

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 44

[Report No. 106–15]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 437) to provide for a Chief

Financial Officer in the Executive Office of the President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 437) to provide

for a Chief Financial Officer in the Executive Office

of the President.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 437) to provide for a Chief Finan6 cial Officer in the Executive Office of the President. The

7 first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General
2

HRES 44 RH

1 debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed

2 one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman

3 and ranking minority member of the Committee on Gov4 ernment Reform. After general debate the bill shall be con5 sidered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill

6 shall be considered as read. During consideration of the

7 bill for amendment, the chairman of the Committee of the

8 Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

9 whether the Member offering an amendment has caused

10 it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record

11 designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII.

12 Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The

13 chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) post14 pone until a time during further consideration in the Com15 mittee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

16 amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

17 time for electronic voting on any postponed question that

18 follows another electronic vote without intervening busi19 ness, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting

20 on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes.

21 At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amend22 ment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the

23 House with such amendments as may have been adopted.

24 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

25 the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without
3

HRES 44 RH

1 intervening motion except one motion to recommit with

2 or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 5

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 44

[Report No. 106–15]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 437)

Executive Office of the President.to provide for a Chief Financial Officer in the

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### §9278. Medal of honor; Air Force cross; distinguished-service cross; distinguished-service medal; silver star: availability of appropriations

The Secretary of the Air Force may spend, from any appropriation for contingent expenses of the Department of the Air Force, amounts necessary to provide medals and devices under sections 9271, 9272, 9273, 9274, 9276, 9277, and 9282 of this title.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 541, §8748; Pub. L. 86–593, §1(5), July 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 332; renumbered §9278 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§806(b)(11), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8748 | 10:1424. | July 9, 1918, ch. 143 (13th par. under "Ordnance Department"), 40 Stat. 871. |

The word "amounts" is substituted for the words "so much as may be". The word "provides" is substituted for the words "defray the cost of". The words "medals and devices under" are substituted for the words "medals of honor, distinguished-service crosses, distinguished-service medals, bars, rosettes, and other devices provided for in". The words "from time to time" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8748 of this title as this section and substituted "sections 9271, 9272, 9273, 9274, 9276, 9277, and 9282" for "sections 8741, 8742, 8743, 8744, 8746, 8747, and 8752".

1960—Pub. L. 86–593 inserted "Air Force cross" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.