alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATE OF THE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

# PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of The
RiceX Company (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|/s/ Todd C. Crow                            | 
|------------------------------------------- | 
|Todd
C. Crow        Chief Financial Officer | 
|                                            | 
|November 15, 2004                           | 

|SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGECOMMISSION |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27 contains summary information extracted from OMI Corporation and
Subsidiaries Consolidated condensed financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
<CURRENCY>                   U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                           24,418
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    12,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 64,748
<PP&E>                                          492,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                  117,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  501,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            53,027
<BONDS>                                         216,105
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         21,862
<OTHER-SE>                                      192,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    501,528
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 65,513
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    43,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 23,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 23,666
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (33,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                         2,729
<NET-INCOME>                                    (30,436)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.73)





</TABLE>
#### § 39.708 Are miles generated by non-ISEP eligible students eligible for transportation funding?

No. Only miles generated by ISEP-eligible students enrolled in and attending a school are eligible for student transportation funding.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 419 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 10, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 6) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
penalty by providing that the income tax rate bracket amounts, and the amount of 
the standard deduction, for joint returns shall be twice the amounts applicable 
to unmarried individuals. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. 
The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the 
bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the 
bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if 
offered by Representative Rangel or his designee, which shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, and 
shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2006281EN.01003102.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/31

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 October 2006 — Freixenet v OHIM (Shape of a frosted matt black bottle)

(Case T-188/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Shape of a frosted matt black bottle - Absolute ground of refusal - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Lack of distinctive character - Infringement of the rights of the defence - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94)

(2006/C 281/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Freixenet, SA (Sant Sadurní d'Anoia, Spain) (represented by: F. de Visscher, E. Cornu, É. De Gryse and D. Moreau, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 February 2004 (Case R 97/2001-4) concerning registration of a mark in the form of a frosted matt black bottle as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 February 2004 (Case R 104/2001-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 February 2004 (Case R 104/2001-4);

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those of the applicant.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 7.8.2004.

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About PBGC 
-  PBGC Information Technology 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# PBGC Information Technology

The Chief information Officer leads the Office of Information Technology which provides IT and electronic communications services and support to PBGC; plans for, directs and coordinates the allocation of corporate resources for IT services, support and related activities; delivers IT business solutions driven by customer requirements; operates, maintains and safeguards PBGC business and infrastructure systems; and oversees the acquisition of IT resources for PBGC. The CIO leads the Office of Information Technology and publishes the PBGC’s IT Strategic Plan, leads the Enterprise Architecture Program, IT Capital Planning Program, IT Infrastructure, and Mission/Business IT Program Management, and other IT initiatives. The CIO Chairs the IT Portfolio Review Board, and works with the Chief Enterprise Architect to standardize and drive technology decisions. 

The CIO and his peer Chiefs meet weekly, monthly or quarterly, based on the size of IT Programs, to review the status of IT Projects, security posture, and technology direction.  In addition, major IT Projects for Development, Modernization and Enhancement are briefed to the CIO and the sponsoring Chiefs on a regular basis or at meaningful milestones.

IT Strategic Plan

IT Modernization Projects

October 20, 2022

##           Related Information      

Chief Information Officer (CIO)

IT Solutions Life Cycle Framework

IT Management Directive
### §9460. Cadets: charges and fees for attendance; limitation

(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided in subsection (b), no charge or fee for tuition, room, or board for attendance at the Academy may be imposed unless the charge or fee is specifically authorized by a law enacted after October 5, 1994.

(b) Exception.—The prohibition specified in subsection (a) does not apply with respect to any item or service provided to cadets for which a charge or fee is imposed as of October 5, 1994. The Secretary of Defense shall notify Congress of any change made by the Academy in the amount of a charge or fee authorized under this subsection.

(Added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §545(c)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1908, §9360; renumbered §9460, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(a)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 9360 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 31.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


     I, Yaron Meerfeld, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of InkSure Technologies Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 5, 2005


/S/ Yaron Meerfeld
------------------
Yaron Meerfeld
Chief Executive Officer
### §1214. Right to full and fair hearing

No member of the armed forces may be retired or separated for physical disability without a full and fair hearing if he demands it.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 100.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1214 | 37:283 (less 1st 17 words). | Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, §413 (less 1st 17 words), 63 Stat. 825. |

The words "including regulations" are omitted as covered by section 1216(a) of this title.
#### § 215.19 Forms.[2]

Application, leases, and other papers must be upon forms prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior. Except as may be otherwise provided and required by the Secretary of the Interior, the leases and other papers required under the regulations in this part shall be in conformity with the forms designated, respectively, as follows:

Form A. Lease of Quapaw Indian land.

Form B. For lease of Indian land other than Quapaw.

Form C. Application by Indian.

Form D. Application for approval of lease.

Form E. Affidavit of lessor (or of superintendent acting for him) and affidavit of lessee.

Form F. Surety bond.

Form G. Affidavit of surety on personal bond.

Form H. Certificate as to sufficiency of surety on personal bond.

Form I. Affidavit as to authority of officers of corporation to execute lease and other papers.

Form J. Penal bond (in lieu of surety bond), and accompanying power of attorney.

Form K. Assignment of lead and zinc lease.

###### Footnotes -
  215.19

[2] Forms may be obtained from the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 553 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 18, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon receipt of a message from the Senate transmitting any 
Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 4810) to provide for reconciliation pursuant 
to section 103(a)(1) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
2001, it shall be in order to consider in the House without intervention of any 
point of order a motion offered by the chairman of the Committee on Ways and 
Means or his designee to take from the Speaker's table the bill, with any Senate 
amendments thereto, to disagree to the Senate amendments, and to request a 
conference with the Senate thereon or agree to any request of the Senate for a 
conference thereon. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided 
and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Ways and Means. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
motion to its adoption without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2. House Resolution 550 is laid on the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANTHONY J. THOMAS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D20-1208 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 16, 2020. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Anthony J. Thomas, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. VILLANTI, LUCAS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
#### § 33.9 Development of procedures.

The Director, Office of Indian Education Programs shall prepare and promulgate procedures to govern the provision of support services by the Bureau of Indian Affairs for the education function. These procedures shall be consistent with existing laws, regulations, Executive Orders, and Departmental policies governing administrative support services. These provisions shall be prepared in consultation with those personnel within the Bureau of Indian Affairs who are responsible to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs for providing support services.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF EDWARD J. BOREY PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Edward J. Borey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 9, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ EDWARD J. BOREY                  
|Edward J. Borey                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
  Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function
 of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)




SERVICER CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2012-A (the “Exchange Act Periodic Reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement (as defined in the related indenture), as amended, in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association




Date:      June 15, 2012




By:    /s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
EXHIBIT 34.1






ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA FOR


ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


ON BEHALF OF AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY, AS SERVICER






REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




Board of Directors and Shareholder of


AEP Texas Central Company


Columbus, Ohio






We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that AEP Texas Central Company (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Senior Secured Transition Bonds (the "Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122 (d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d) (4)(v), 1122(d)( 4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Securities. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the Senior Secured Transition Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.






/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP








March 28, 2014


Columbus, Ohio