Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2012 / Notices 74479 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Test marketing 

exemptions. 

Dated: December 3, 2012. 

Chandler Sirmons, 

Acting Director, Information Management 

Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and 

Toxics. 

[FR Doc. 2012–30239 Filed 12–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–9006–5] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–7146 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 

Statements 

Filed 12/03/2012 Through 12/07/2012 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

Notice 

Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act 

requires that EPA make public its 

comments on EISs issued by other 

Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters 

on EISs are available at: http:// 

www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/ 

eisdata.html. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As of 

October 1, 2012, EPA will not accept 

paper copies or CDs of EISs for filing 

purposes; all submissions on or after 

October 1, 2012 must be made through 

e-NEPA. While this system eliminates 

the need to submit paper or CD copies 

to EPA to meet filing requirements, 

electronic submission does not change 

requirements for distribution of EISs for 

public review and comment. To begin 

using e-NEPA, you must first register 

with EPA’s electronic reporting site— 

https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp. 

EIS No. 20120379, Final EIS, BLM, CA, 

West Chocolate Mountains Renewable 

Energy Evaluation Area, Proposed 

California Desert Conservation Area 

Plan Amendment, Imperial County, 

CA, Review Period Ends: 01/14/2013, 

Contact: Sandra McGinnis 916–978– 

4427. 

EIS No. 20120380, Draft EIS, BLM, AK, 

Ring of Fire Resource Management 

Plan Amendment, Haines Block 

Planning Area, Southeast Alaska, 

Comment Period Ends: 03/14/2013, 

Contact: Molly Cobbs 907–267–1221. 

EIS No. 20120381, Draft Supplement, 

NRC, TX, GENERIC—License 

Renewal of Nuclear Plants 

Supplement 48 Regarding South 

Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 (NUREG 

1437) Matagorda County, TX, 

Comment Period Ends: 02/22/2013, 

Contact: Tam Tran 301–415–3617. 

EIS No. 20120382, Draft Supplement, 

FTA, MN, Central Corridor Light Rail 

Transit Project, Construction-Related 

Potential Impacts on Business 

Revenue, St. Paul and Twin Cities 

Metropolitan Area, MN, Comment 

Period Ends: 01/30/2013, Contact: 

Maya Sarna 202–366–5811 

EIS No. 20120383, Draft EIS, USACE, 

CA, Gregory Canyon Landfill, 

Application for Permit Authorizing 

Discharge of Fill in U.S. Waters, San 

Diego County, CA, Comment Period 

Ends: 02/12/2013, Contact: William 

H. Miller 602–230–6954. 

EIS No. 20120384, Final EIS, BLM, NV, 

Searchlight Wind Energy Project, 

NVN–084626 and NVN–086777, 

Application for Right-of-Way Grant on 

Public Land to Develop, Construct, 

Operate, Maintain and Decommission 

of a 200 megawatt Wind Energy 

Facility, USACE Section 404 Permit, 

Clark County, NV, Review Period 

Ends: 01/14/2013, Contact: Gregory 

Helseth 702–515–5173 

EIS No. 20120385, Final EIS, DOE, WA, 

Hanford Site Tank Closure and Waste 

Management Project, Richland, 

Benton County, WA, Review Period 

Ends: 01/14/2013, Contact: Mary Beth 

Burandt 888–829–6347. 

EIS No. 20120386, Final EIS, FTA, MD, 

Red Line Project, Implementation of a 

new East-West Light Rail Transit 

Alignment, Baltimore County, MD, 

Review Period Ends: 01/28/2013, 

Contact: Daniel Koenig 202–219– 

3528. 

Amended Notices 

EIS No. 20120334, Draft EIS, USFS, OR, 

Oregon Dunes NRA Management Area 

10(C) Designated Routes Project, 

Central Coast Ranger District, Oregon 

Dunes National Recreation Area, 

Siuslaw National Forest, Coos, 

Douglas, and Lane Counties OR, 

Comment Period Ends: 01/24/2013, 

Contact: Angie Morris 541–271–6040. 

Revision to FR Notice Published 10/ 

26/2012; Extending Comment from 

12/10/2012 to 01/24/2013. 

Dated: December 11, 2012. 

Cliff Rader, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. 2012–30237 Filed 12–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0898; FRL–9372–2] 

Registration Review; Pesticide 

Dockets Opened for Review and 

Comment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: With this document, EPA is 

opening the public comment period for 

several registration reviews. Registration 

review is EPA’s periodic review of 

pesticide registrations to ensure that 

each pesticide continues to satisfy the 

statutory standard for registration, that 

is, the pesticide can perform its 

intended function without unreasonable 

adverse effects on human health or the 

environment. Registration review 

dockets contain information that will 

assist the public in understanding the 

types of information and issues that the 

Agency may consider during the course 

of registration reviews. Through this 

program, EPA is ensuring that each 

pesticide’s registration is based on 

current scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. EPA is also 

announcing the availability of amended 

final work plans (FWPs) for the 

following active ingredients: Sodium 

pyrithione (formerly known as sodium 

omadine), methylene bis(thiocyanate), 

troysan KK–108A (IPBC), zinc salts, and 

tri-n butyl tetradecyl phosphonium 

chloride (TTPC). 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 12, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) number for the specific pesticide of 

interest provided in the table in Unit 

III.A., by one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with 

74480 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2012 / Notices 

dockets generally, is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

pesticide specific information contact: 

The Chemical Review Manager or 

Regulatory Action Leader identified in 

the table in Unit III.A. for the pesticide 

of interest. 

For general information contact: 

Kevin Costello, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 305–5026; fax number: 

(703) 308–8090; email address: 

costello.kevin@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, 

farmworker, and agricultural advocates; 

the chemical industry; pesticide users; 

and members of the public interested in 

the sale, distribution, or use of 

pesticides. Since others also may be 

interested, the Agency has not 

attempted to describe all the specific 

entities that may be affected by this 

action. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 

achieve environmental justice, the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of any group, including minority and/or 

low income populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. To help 

address potential environmental justice 

issues, the Agency seeks information on 

any groups or segments of the 

population who, as a result of their 

location, cultural practices, or other 

factors, may have atypical or 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health impacts or environmental 

effects from exposure to the pesticides 

discussed in this document, compared 

to the general population. 

II. Authority 

EPA is initiating its reviews of the 

pesticides identified in this document 

pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal 

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 

Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural 

Regulations for Registration Review at 

40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g) 

of FIFRA provides, among other things, 

that the registrations of pesticides are to 

be reviewed every 15 years. Under 

FIFRA, a pesticide product may be 

registered or remain registered only if it 

meets the statutory standard for 

registration given in FIFRA section 

3(c)(5). When used in accordance with 

widespread and commonly recognized 

practice, the pesticide product must 

perform its intended function without 

unreasonable adverse effects on the 

environment; that is, without any 

unreasonable risk to man or the 

environment, or a human dietary risk 

from residues that result from the use of 

a pesticide in or on food. 

III. Registration Reviews 

A. What action is the agency taking? 

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), 

EPA is reviewing the pesticide 

registrations identified in the table in 

this unit to assure that they continue to 

satisfy the FIFRA standard for 

registration—that is, they can still be 

used without unreasonable adverse 

effects on human health or the 

environment. A pesticide’s registration 

review begins when the Agency 

establishes a docket for the pesticide’s 

registration review case and opens the 

docket for public review and comment. 

At present, EPA is opening registration 

review dockets for the cases identified 

in this table. 

TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW DOCKETS OPENING

Registration review case name 

and number Docket ID No. Chemical review manager or regulatory action leader, telephone number, email address 

2,4-D ......................................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0330 .................. Jill Bloom, (703) 308–8019, bloom.jill@epa.gov. 

Bacillus pumilus ....................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0857 .................. Susanne Cerrelli, (703) 308–8077, 

cerrelli.susanne@epa.gov. 

Bifenazate ................................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0633 .................. Garland Waleko, (703) 308–8049,

waleko.garland@epa.gov. 

Chlorinated isocyanurates ........................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0794 .................. Wanda Henson, (703) 308–6345, henson.wanda@epa.gov. 

Chlorsulfuron ............................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0878 .................. Kaitlin Keller, (703) 308–8172, keller.kaitlin@epa.gov. 

Clodinafop-propargyl ................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0424 .................. Wilhelmena Livingston, (703) 308–8025, 

livingston.wilhelmena@epa.gov. 

Folpet ....................................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0859 .................. Christina Scheltema, (703) 308–2201, 

scheltema.christina@epa.gov. 

Foramsulfuron .......................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0387 .................. Jose Gayoso, (703) 347–8652, gayoso.jose@epa.gov. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with 

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2012 / Notices 74481 

TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW DOCKETS OPENING—Continued 

Registration review case name 

and number Docket ID No. Chemical review manager or regulatory action leader, telephone number, email address 

Hydramethylnon ....................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0869 .................. Steven Snyderman, (703) 347–0249, 

snyderman.steven@epa.gov. 

Iprodione .................................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0392 .................. James Parker, (703) 306–0469, parker.james@epa.gov. 

Kresoxim-methyl ....................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0861 .................. Katie Weyrauch, (703) 308–0166, 

weyrauch.katie@epa.gov. 

Phenol, and salts ..................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0810 .................. Elizabeth Hernandez, (703) 347–0241, hernandez.elizabeth@epa.gov. 

Prohexadione calcium .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0870 .................. Katie Weyrauch, (703) 308–0166, 

weyrauch.katie@epa.gov. 

Sodium carbonate .................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0809 .................. Seiichi Murasaki, (703) 347–0163, 

murasaki.seiichi@epa.gov. 

Sulfometuron methyl ................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0433 .................. Rusty Wasem, (703) 305–6979, wasem.russell@epa.gov. 

Triphenyltin hydroxide (TPTH) (also 

known as fentin hydroxide).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0413 .................. Susan Bartow, (703) 603–0065, bartow.susan@epa.gov. 

EPA is announcing the availability of 

amended FWPs for the following active 

ingredients: Sodium pyrithione (also 

known as sodium omadine), docket ID 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0611; 

methylene bis(thiocyanate), docket ID 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0613; 

IPBC, docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2011–0420; zinc salts, docket ID number 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0011; and TTPC, 

docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011– 

0952. These FWPs have been amended 

to incorporate changes to data 

requirements and/or clarifications to 

planned risk assessments for registration 

review. 

B. Docket Content 

1. Review dockets. The registration 

review dockets contain information that 

the Agency may consider in the course 

of the registration review. The Agency 

may include information from its files 

including, but not limited to, the 

following information: 

• An overview of the registration 

review case status. 

• A list of current product 

registrations and registrants. 

• Federal Register notices regarding 

any pending registration actions. 

• Federal Register notices regarding 

current or pending tolerances. 

• Risk assessments. 

• Bibliographies concerning current 

registrations. 

• Summaries of incident data. 

• Any other pertinent data or 

information. 

Each docket contains a document 

summarizing what the Agency currently 

knows about the pesticide case and a 

preliminary work plan for anticipated 

data and assessment needs. Additional 

documents provide more detailed 

information. During this public 

comment period, the Agency is asking 

that interested persons identify any 

additional information they believe the 

Agency should consider during the 

registration reviews of these pesticides. 

The Agency identifies in each docket 

the areas where public comment is 

specifically requested, though comment 

in any area is welcome. 

2. Other related information. More 

information on these cases, including 

the active ingredients for each case, may 

be located in the registration review 

schedule on the Agency’s Web site at 

http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/ 

registration_review/schedule.htm. 

Information on the Agency’s registration 

review program and its implementing 

regulation may be seen at http:// 

www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/ 

registration_review. 

3. Information submission 

requirements. Anyone may submit data 

or information in response to this 

document. To be considered during a 

pesticide’s registration review, the 

submitted data or information must 

meet the following requirements: 

• To ensure that EPA will consider 

data or information submitted, 

interested persons must submit the data 

or information during the comment 

period. The Agency may, at its 

discretion, consider data or information 

submitted at a later date. 

• The data or information submitted 

must be presented in a legible and 

useable form. For example, an English 

translation must accompany any 

material that is not in English and a 

written transcript must accompany any 

information submitted as an 

audiographic or videographic record. 

Written material may be submitted in 

paper or electronic form. 

• Submitters must clearly identify the 

source of any submitted data or 

information. 

• Submitters may request the Agency 

to reconsider data or information that 

the Agency rejected in a previous 

review. However, submitters must 

explain why they believe the Agency 

should reconsider the data or 

information in the pesticide’s 

registration review. 

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the 

registration review docket for each 

pesticide case will remain publicly 

accessible through the duration of the 

registration review process; that is, until 

all actions required in the final decision 

on the registration review case have 

been completed. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Pesticides 

and pests. 

Dated: December 7, 2012. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2012–30242 Filed 12–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK 

[Public Notice 2012–0547] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Final Collection; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and 

comments request. 

Form Title: EIB 99–17 Enhanced 

Assignment of Policy Proceeds. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of 

the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a part 

of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to comment on the 

proposed information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. 

The form represents the exporter’s 

directive to Ex-Im Bank to whom and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with