alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §894. Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who—

(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;

(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;

(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.

(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 68.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 894(a)894(b) | 50:688(a).50:688(b). | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 94), 64 Stat. 136. |

894(b)

50:688(b).

In subsection (a)(1) and (2), the words "or persons" are omitted, since, under section 1 of title 1, words importing the singular may apply to several persons.

In subsection (a)(3), the word "a" is substituted for the words "an offense of". The words "commissioned officer" are inserted after the word "superior", for clarity.
#### § 502.6 Commission.

*Commission* means the National Indian Gaming Commission.
# C_2006212EN.01003301.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/33

---

Action brought on 29 June 2006 — Coca-Cola Company v OHIM — Azienda Agricola San Polo (MEZZOPANE)

(Case T-175/06)

(2006/C 212/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Coca-Cola Company (N.W Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A) (represented by: E. Armijo Chavarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Azienda Agricola San Polo Exe S.r.l

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 April 2006 in Case R-99/2005-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 April 2006 in Case R-99/2005-1;

| — | order the Office to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Azienda Agricola San Polo Exe S.r.l

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark 'MEZZOPANE' for goods in Class 33 — Application No 2 242 147.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark 'MEZZO' and 'MEZZOMIX' for goods in Class 32.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Application for registration of the mark refused.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Opposition Division's decision annulled.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 since the goods designated by the opposing marks are similar, the opposing marks are visually and phonetically similar and the marks at issue are capable of giving rise to a likelihood of confusion in the course of trade.

Pleas in law:

---
### §910. Art. 110. Improper hazarding of vessel or aircraft

(a) Willful and Wrongful Hazarding.—Any person subject to this chapter who, willfully and wrongfully, hazards or suffers to be hazarded any vessel or aircraft of the armed forces shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Negligent Hazarding.—Any person subject to this chapter who negligently hazards or suffers to be hazarded any vessel or aircraft of the armed forces shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 71; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5422, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2947.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 910(a)910(b) | 50:704(a).50:704(b). | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 110), 64 Stat. 139. |

910(b)

50:704(b).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) Any person subject to this chapter who willfully and wrongfully hazards or suffers to be hazarded any vessel of the armed forces shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

"(b) Any person subject to this chapter who negligently hazards or suffers to be hazarded any vessel of the armed forces shall be punished as a court-martial may direct."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
EXHIBIT 35.1

VW Credit, Inc. Servicer Compliance Statement Under Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB





VOLKSWAGEN AUTO LOAN ENHANCED TRUST 2012-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of VW
Credit, Inc. (VCI), as Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 26, 2012 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Sale and Servicing Agreement), by
and among Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2012-1, as Issuer, Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC as Seller, VW Credit, Inc., as Servicer, and Citibank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this twenty-eighth day of March, 2014.



/s/ Dr. Christian DahlheimDr. Christian DahlheimExecutive Vice President & CFO
Exhibit 31.1

AVALON HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald E. Klingle, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avalon Holdings Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this quarterly
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 10, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle  
|Ronald E. Klingle      
|Chief Executive Officer
### [§§1801 to 1805. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1061(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 442]

Section 1801, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title XIII, §1322(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2551, related to volunteer program to assist independent states of former Soviet Union.

Section 1802, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title XIII, §1322(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2551; amended Pub. L. 103–35, title II, §201(f)(3), (g)(3), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 99, 100, set out criteria to be used in selecting volunteers.

Section 1803, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title XIII, §1322(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2552, related to determining needs for volunteers and role of Secretary of State.

Section 1804, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title XIII, §1322(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2553; amended Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XI, §1182(a)(4), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1771, related to the compensation and benefits of volunteers.

Section 1805, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title XIII, §1322(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2553, provided that selection of volunteers to participate in program under this chapter terminate Sept. 30, 1995.
§ 502.3 Class II gaming. *Class II gaming* means: ( a ) Bingo or lotto (whether or not electronic, computer, or other technologic aids are used) when players: ( 1 ) Play for prizes with cards bearing numbers or other designations;
( 2 ) Cover numbers or designations when object, similarly numbered or designated, are drawn or electronically determined; and
( 3 ) Win the game by being the first person to cover a designated pattern on such cards;
( b ) If played in the same location as bingo or lotto, pull-tabs, punch boards, tip jars, instant bingo, and other games similar to bingo;
( c ) Nonbanking card games that: ( 1 ) State law explicitly authorizes, or does not explicitly prohibit, and are played legally anywhere in the state; and
( 2 ) Players play in conformity with state laws and regulations concerning hours, periods of operation, and limitations on wagers and pot sizes;
( d ) Card games played in the states of Michigan, North Dakota, South Dakota, or Washington if: ( 1 ) An Indian tribe actually operates the same card games as played on or before May 1, 1988, as determined by the Chairman; and
( 2 ) The pot and wager limits remain the same as on or before May 1, 1988, as determined by the Chariman;
( e ) Individually owned class II gaming operations— ( 1 ) That were operating on September 1, 1986;
( 2 ) That meet the requirements of 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(4)(B);
( 3 ) Where the nature and scope of the game remains as it was on October 17, 1988; and
( 4 ) Where the ownership interest or interests are the same as on October 17, 1988.
# C_2014069EN.01002901.xml

| 7.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/29

---

Decisions in the context of the monitoring of the implementation of decisions regarding restructuring and liquidation aid for financial institutions

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 69/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 19.7.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | SA.32745 (11/MC) |
| Member State | Austria |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | State support for the run-off of Kommunalkredit Austria AG |
| Type of decision | New decision related to the following Commission decision: SA.32745 (11/NN) |
| Content | Other adaptation |
| Other information | Approval of additional aid |

Date of adoption of the decision

19.7.2013

Reference number of the aid

SA.32745 (11/MC)

Member State

Austria

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

State support for the run-off of Kommunalkredit Austria AG

Type of decision

New decision related to the following Commission decision: SA.32745 (11/NN)

Content

Other adaptation

Other information

Approval of additional aid

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### § 502.25 Gaming Enterprise.

*Gaming Enterprise* means the entities through which Tribe conducts, regulates, and secures gaming on Indian lands within such tribe's jurisdiction pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

[88 FR 55371, Aug. 15, 2023]
EX-33.1
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE


CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the "Asserting Party"), an
indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc, is responsible for assessing compliance
as of December 31, 2012, and for the period from January 1, 2012 through
December 31, 2012 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set
forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(l)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi),
(d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal
Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The servicing activities covered by this report include all loans
for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting
Party served as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party
has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
as of December 31, 2012, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the
Platform taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2012, and for the Reporting
Period.

CORELOGIC COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.


/s/Vicki Chenault
Vicki Chenault,
Senior Vice President
February 6, 2013

Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          78,077
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,804
<PP&E>                                         159,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                (52,981)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 486,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          476,228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,048
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,312)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   486,964
<SALES>                                        304,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,227
<CGS>                                          239,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,121,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,065,260)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,065,260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (803,235)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,868,495)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999. YOU
SHOULD READ THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THEIR ENTIRETY FOR A FULL EXPLANATION OF
THIS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,814,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,459,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                   648,372
<INVENTORY>                                     68,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,922,904
<PP&E>                                       3,348,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                 751,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,335,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,077,857
<BONDS>                                     22,170,366
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,401
<OTHER-SE>                                   (882,285)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,335,095
<SALES>                                      1,459,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,036,715
<CGS>                                        1,332,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,050,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,157,561
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               509,836
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,879,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (21,481,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (356,960)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (21,968,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (844,552)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (21,968,901)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600246

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

DAVID C. HARRIS

Hospitalman Apprentice (E-2), United States Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Paul C. LeBlanc, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 29 September 2016

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, RUGH and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court