alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 162.018 May tribes administer this part on BIA's behalf?

A tribe or tribal organization may contract or compact under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450f *et seq.*) to administer any portion of this part that is not an approval or disapproval of a lease document, waiver of a requirement for lease approval (including but not limited to waivers of fair market rental and valuation, bonding, and insurance), cancellation of a lease, or an appeal.
# C_2006267EN.01000601.xml

| 1.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4362 — Voestalpine/K+N/Euroshipping)

(2006/C 267/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4362. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4362. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2006303EN.01010101.xml

| 13.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/101 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/101

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2006/C 303/35)

OJ C 225 of 19.9.2006

OJ C 225 of 19.9.2006

History of previous publications:

History of previous publications:

| | OJ C 184 of 8.8.2006 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 184 of 8.8.2006

| | OJ C 176 of 28.7.2006 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 176 of 28.7.2006

| | OJ C 151 of 29.6.2006 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 151 of 29.6.2006

| | OJ C 130 of 3.6.2006 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 130 of 3.6.2006

| | OJ C 122 of 23.5.2006 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 122 of 23.5.2006

| | OJ C 107 of 6.5.2006 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 107 of 6.5.2006

---
### §9203. Retired commissioned officers: status

A retired commissioned officer of the Air Force or the Space Force who is on active duty is considered, for all purposes except promotion, to be an officer of the organization to which he is assigned.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 526, §8503; renumbered §9203, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(4), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3810.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8503 | 10:999. | July 9, 1918, ch. 143, subch. XX (2d par.), 40 Stat. 893. |

The words "and shall be an extra number therein" are omitted, since, in the opinion of the Judge Advocate General of the Army (JAG 210.85, Feb. 21, 1923), they were repealed by the Act of July 31, 1935, ch. 422, 49 Stat. 505. The words "in the discretion of the President, employed * * * assigned to duty" are omitted as surplusage. The words "arms, corps, department" are omitted, since the Air Force does not have organic corps created by statute.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted "or the Space Force" after "the Air Force".

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8503 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Exhibit 4.2
​
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following description of the capital stock of ESSA Pharma Inc. (the “Company,” “our” and “we”) is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, which are incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit is a part.
Common Shares
We are authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, without par value.
Holders of our common shares are entitled to receive notice of any meetings of our shareholders, and to attend and to cast one vote per common share at all such meetings. Holders of common shares are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis such dividends on the common shares, if any, as and when declared by our board of directors at its discretion, from funds legally available therefor, and, upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis the net assets of the Company after payment of debts and other liabilities, in each case subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to any other series or class of shares ranking senior in priority to or on a pro rata basis with, the holders of common shares with respect to dividends or liquidation. Our common shares do not carry any pre-emptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights, nor do they contain any sinking or purchase fund provisions.
Our common shares are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “EPIX.”
Preferred Shares
We may issue our preferred shares from time to time in one or more series. The terms of each series of preferred shares, including the number of shares, the designation, rights, preferences, privileges, priorities, restrictions, conditions and limitations, will be determined at the time of creation of each such series by our board of directors, without shareholder approval, provided that all preferred shares will rank equally within their class as to dividends and distributions in the event of our dissolution, liquidation or winding-up.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 554 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 19, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4576) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 518.3 Who is eligible to petition for a certificate of self-regulation? A tribe is eligible to petition the Commission for a certificate of self-regulation of Class II gaming if, for a three (3)-year period immediately preceding the date of its petition: ( a ) The tribe has continuously conducted such gaming;
( b ) All gaming that the tribe has engaged in, or has licensed and regulated, on Indian lands within the tribe's jurisdiction, is located within a State that permits such gaming for any purpose by any person, organization or entity (and such gaming is not otherwise specifically prohibited on Indian lands by Federal law), in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(1)(A);
( c ) The governing body of the tribe has adopted an ordinance or resolution that the Chair has approved, in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(1)(B);
( d ) The tribe has otherwise complied with the provisions of 25 U.S.C. 2710; and
( e ) The gaming operation and the tribal regulatory body have, for the three (3) years immediately preceding the date of the petition, maintained all records required to support the petition for self-regulation.
#### § 39.603 Is school board training required for all Bureau-funded schools?

Yes. Any new member of a local school board or an agency school board must complete 40 hours of training within one year of appointment, provided that such training is recommended, but is not required, for a tribal governing body that serves in the capacity of a school board.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 302

Expressing the desire of the House of Representatives to not spend any

of the budget surplus created by social security receipts and to continue

to retire the debt held by the public.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1999

Mr. HERGER (for himself, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr.

GARY MILLER of California, and Mr. SHAYS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

RESOLUTION

Expressing the desire of the House of Representatives to

not spend any of the budget surplus created by social

security receipts and to continue to retire the debt held

by the public.

Whereas, earlier this year, the House of Representatives

passed a social security lockbox designed to protect the

social security surplus by an overwhelming vote of 416 to

12;

Whereas bipartisan efforts over the past few years have eliminated the budget deficit and created a projected com-
2

•HRES 302 IH

bined Social Security and non-Social Security surplus of

$2,896,000,000,000 over the next 10 years;

Whereas this surplus is largely due to the collection of the

social security taxes and interest on already collected receipts in the trust fund;

Whereas the President and the Congress have not reached an

agreement to use any of the surplus on providing tax relief; and

Whereas any unspent portion of the projected surplus will

have the effect of reducing the debt held by the public:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the the House of

2 Representatives that the House—

3 (1) should not consider legislation that would

4 spend any of the social security surplus;

5 (2) should also resist any effort to spend the

6 on-budget surplus should the Congress and the ad7 ministration not reach an agreement on the issue of

8 taxes; and

9 (3) should continue to pursue efforts to con10 tinue to reduce the $3,618,000,000,000 in debt held

11 by the public.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.89 What procedures will the Secretary use to enforce leases, business agreements, or rights-of-way? ( a ) The Secretary and a Tribe will consult with each other regarding enforcement of and Secretarial assistance needed to enforce leases, business agreements, or rights-of-way entered into under a TERA. When appropriate, the Secretary will: ( 1 ) Use the notification and enforcement procedures established in 25 CFR parts 162, 211 and 225 to ensure compliance with leases and business agreements; and
( 2 ) Use the notification and enforcement procedures of 25 CFR part 169 to ensure compliance with rights-of-way.
( b ) All enforcement remedies established in 25 CFR parts 162, 211, 225, and 169 are available to the Secretary.
(logo) NTS

NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION ABSERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2018, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank N.A.** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2018 and forthe period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d)of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicingcriteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria.  Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii),1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122 (d)(2)(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi),and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to theactivities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by thisreport. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities itperforms with respect to the transactions covered by this report. Thetransactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf ofthe Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori Eshoo

 Lori D. Eshoo,President/CEO 

January 25, 2019

 

 

 130 S. Jefferson Street 

Suite300

Chicago, IL 60661
#### § 173.15 Permittee subject to State law.

The holder of any permit issued under this part shall be subject to and abide by the laws and regulations of the United States and State laws if applicable to the conduct of the particular business or activity conducted by the permittee. Violations of this section shall render the permit void but shall not release the permittee from any obligations arising thereunder.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 27, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 05-30843

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

FRANK D STEWART,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:04-CV-01724

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Frank Stewart, recipient of supplemental social security income, appeals the district court’s

entry of judgment against the Commissioner in the amount of $2,731.20. In his appeal from the
2

Social Security Administration, Stewart sought a judgment ordering the Commissioner to reissue

several benefit checks that he claimed he had not cashed. He also sought review of the

Commissioner’s decision to deduct $43 a month from his benefits for Medicare premiums.

Stewart argues that the district court erred in holding that his claim that the Commissioner

erroneously deducted $43 a month from his benefits to cover his Medicare premiums was not

administratively exhausted. Stewart argues that he made an oral request to the Commissioner that

this amount not be deducted. However, he fails to cite any evidence in the record that this claim was

presented to the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) or the Appeals Council. He therefore has not

met his burden of establishing exhaustion.

Stewart next contends that the district court erroneously offset the judgment against the

Commissioner by $1,153.80, which is the amount of an alleged overpayment Stewart received. 

Stewart argues that the issue of an offset was not pled or raised by the Commissioner in the district

court. Nor does either party or the district court direct our attention to a valid administrative finding

of an overpayment. The district court relied on the ALJ’s finding that an overpayment had been

made, but the Appeals Council vacated thisfinding in part because a motion for reconsideration was

pending before theCommissioner on the issue. Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court

to ascertain whether there was or is now a proper administrative finding of an overpayment and ifso,

to resolve the issue of an overpayment.

The motionsto strike the appellee’s brief and hear the case on the appellant’s brief and record

excerpts alone are DENIED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED

in part, and the case REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings.
# C_2006294EN.01007001.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/70

---

(2006/C 294/136)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 281, 18.11.2006

OJ C 281, 18.11.2006

Past publications

OJ C 261, 28.10.2006

OJ C 249, 14.10.2006

OJ C 237, 30.9.2006

OJ C 224, 16.9.2006

OJ C 212, 2.9.2006

OJ C 190, 12.8.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### Frederick C. Withers and Others v. The City of New York.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice.
### §8879. Powers of district court over prize property notwithstanding appeal

Notwithstanding an appeal, the district court may make and execute all necessary orders for the custody and disposal of prize property.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 483, §7679; renumbered §8879, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7679 | 34 U.S.C. 1147. | R.S. 565; R.S. 4637. |

34 U.S.C. 1147 and this section reflect—

(1) Act of March 3, 1899, ch. 413, §13, 30 Stat. 1007, which repealed all laws authorizing distribution of prize proceeds to captors;

(2) Acts of March 3, 1911, ch. 231, §128, 36 Stat. 1133, and February 13, 1925, ch. 229, §1, 43 Stat. 938, which defined the appellate jurisdiction of the United States circuit courts, and provided that the Supreme Court should not directly review district court decisions except in specified cases, not including prize cases; and

(3) Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 869, which repealed the Acts of February 13, 1925, and March 3, 1911, supra, but enacted similar provisions and changed the name of United States Circuit Courts of Appeals to United States Courts of Appeals for the several circuits.

Reference to the court is omitted from 34 U.S.C. 1147 and from the revised section in view of the 1948 Act.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7679 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4356]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 15, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Cara Mulder, Prinsburg, Minnesota, to join a group acting in 
concert with Myron Mulder, Prinsburg, Minnesota; to acquire and retain 
control of PSB Financial Shares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
and retain control of Prinsbank, both in Prinsburg, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 23, 
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-4356 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P