alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §777a. Wearing of insignia of higher grade before appointment to a grade above major general or rear admiral (frocking): authority; restrictions

(a) Authority.—An officer serving in a grade below the grade of lieutenant general or, in the case of the Navy, vice admiral, who has been selected for appointment to the grade of lieutenant general or general, or, in the case of the Navy, vice admiral or admiral, and an officer serving in the grade of lieutenant general or vice admiral who has been selected for appointment to the grade of general or admiral, may be authorized, under regulations and policies of the Department of Defense and subject to subsection (b), to wear the insignia for that higher grade for a period of up to 14 days before assuming the duties of a position for which the higher grade is authorized. An officer who is so authorized to wear the insignia of a higher grade is said to be "frocked" to that grade.

(b) Restrictions.—An officer may not be authorized to wear the insignia for a grade as described in subsection (a) unless—

(1) the Senate has given its advice and consent to the appointment of the officer to that grade;

(2) the officer has received orders to serve in a position outside the military department of that officer for which that grade is authorized;

(3) the Secretary of Defense (or a civilian officer within the Office of the Secretary of Defense whose appointment was made with the advice and consent of the Senate and to whom the Secretary delegates such approval authority) has given approval for the officer to wear the insignia for that grade before assuming the duties of a position for which that grade is authorized; and

(4) the Secretary of Defense has submitted to Congress a written notification of the intent to authorize the officer to wear the insignia for that grade.

(c) Benefits Not to Be Construed as Accruing.—(1) Authority provided to an officer as described in subsection (a) to wear the insignia of a higher grade may not be construed as conferring authority for that officer to—

(A) be paid the rate of pay provided for an officer in that grade having the same number of years of service as that officer; or

(B) assume any legal authority associated with that grade.

(2) The period for which an officer wears the insignia of a higher grade under such authority may not be taken into account for any of the following purposes:

(A) Seniority in that grade.

(B) Time of service in that grade.

(d) Limitation on Number of Officers Frocked.—The total number of officers who are authorized to wear the insignia for a higher grade under this section shall count against the limitation in section 777(d) of this title on the total number of officers authorized to wear the insignia of a higher grade.

(Added Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title V, §505(a)(1), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4208.)
#### § 273.194 Does the Indian Education Committee have authority to cancel contracts?

The Indian Education Committee may recommend to the BIE Director, through the appropriate awarding official, cancellation or suspension of a contract(s) that contains the program(s) approved by the Indian Education Committee, if the contractor fails to permit such Committee to exercise its powers and duties.
### §12641. Standards and procedures: Secretary to prescribe

(a) The Secretary concerned shall, by regulation, prescribe—

(1) standards and qualifications for the retention and promotion of members of the reserve components under his jurisdiction; and

(2) equitable procedures for the periodic determination of the compliance of each such Reserve with those standards and qualifications.

(b) If a Reserve fails to comply with the standards and qualifications prescribed under subsection (a), he shall—

(1) if qualified, be transferred to an inactive reserve status;

(2) if qualified, be retired without pay; or

(3) have his appointment or enlistment terminated.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 79, §1001; renumbered §12641 and amended Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(h)(2), (4)(A), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2996.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1001(a) 1001(b) | 10:1036c (1st sentence).34:440k (1st sentence).10:1036c (2d sentence).34:440k (2d sentence). | June 29, 1948, ch. 708, §304 (less last sentence), 62 Stat. 1088. |

1001(b)

34:440k (1st sentence).

10:1036c (2d sentence).

34:440k (2d sentence).

In subsection (a), the words "As soon as may be practicable after the effective date of sections 1036–1036i [440h–440q] of this title" are omitted as executed. The words "not inconsistent with said sections or any other Act" and "appropriate" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 renumbered section 1001 of this title as this section and substituted "Standards and procedures: Secretary to prescribe" for "Secretary to prescribe" as section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–337 effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as an Effective Date note under section 10001 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7290]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Reconfiguring an African Icon: Odes to the Mask by Modern and Contemporary Artists from Three Continents,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about March 8, 2011, until on or about August 21, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (                        *telephone:*                         202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

Dated: January 4, 2011.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011-361 Filed 1-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
NUMBER 13-08-340-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

JEROME D. BROWN, Appellant,

v.

SGT. E. CASTRO, ET AL., Appellees.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jerome D. Brown, brought an appeal from a judgment entered by the

343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-07-1511-CV-C. Appellant

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the appeal is interlocutory

because he has not exhausted his administrative remedies. The Court, having considered
2

the documents on file and appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that

the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss

is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Having dismissed the appeal at

appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue

forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 10th day of July, 2008.
# C_2006246EN.01002501.xml

| 13.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/25

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4374 — CVRD/INCO)

(2006/C 246/17)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5 October 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4374. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4374. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QuadTech International,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Roland Vetter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and
(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to QuadTech International,, Inc. and will be retained byQuadTech International,, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

March 19, 2007 

By: /s/ J. Roland Vetter
J Roland Vetter

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 33 (Thursday, February 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3560]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Office of the Secretary


Request for Comments on the Strategy for American Innovation

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice and Request for Information; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 4, 2011, the Department of Commerce published a 
Request for Information (FRI) seeking input on a range of policy 
matters that can affect our innovativeness and competitiveness but 
particularly the Administration's Innovation Strategy (see http://www.Commerce.gov/competes for a link to the report). Due to an 
inadvertent error, that RFI contained an incorrect e-mail address where 
the public may submit comments and an incorrect phone number for the 
public contact. This notice provides the correct e-mail address and 
contact phone number. The public may submit e-mail comments to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d4e42405d48594459445b4843485e5e6d49424e034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="51323e3c21342538253827343f34222211353e327f363e27">[email protected]</span></a> and may contact Sabrina L. Montes at 202-482-
6495 for any questions on the notice.

DATES: Comments must be postmarked or submitted by no later than April 
1, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``Innovation Strategy 
RFI'' by any of the following methods:

E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0a3afadb0a5b4a9b4a9b6a5aea5b3b380a4afa3eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5868a889580918c918c93808b809696a5818a86cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>. Mail: Office of the Chief Economist, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., HCHB Room 
4852, Washington, DC 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sabrina L. Montes: e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e4d5371706a7b6d5e7a717d30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bceff1d3d2c8d9cffcd8d3df92dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>; telephone 202-482-6495.

    Dated: February 9, 2011.
John Connor,
Office of the Secretary of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2011-3560 Filed 2-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-EA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 293.11 When will the 45-day timeline begin?

The 45-day timeline will begin when a compact or amendment is received either electronically or hard copy submission and date stamped by the Office of Indian Gaming. The Department will provide an email acknowledgement to the Tribe and the State of receipt and provide the date on which the Secretary's 45-day review period will expire for electronically submitted compacts or amendments.
EX-10.17





 Exhibit 10.17 

Employment Letter Amendment 
 Chobani Global Holdings,
LLC 
 200 Lafayette St, 
 New York, NY 10012 

Dated November 13, 2021 
 Hamdi Ulukaya 

Chobani Global Holdings, LLC 
 200 Lafayette St., 6th Floor 

New York, New York 10012 
  

	 	Re:	 Second Amendment to Employment Agreement 



Dear Hamdi, 
 This letter amends the terms of the Employment Agreement, dated as of
June 27, 2018 as amended on December 20, 2018 (“Employment Agreement”), by and between you and Chobani Global Holdings, LLC (the “Company”). You and the Company hereby agree that Section 5 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its
entirety. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged. 
 Please indicate your acceptance of these terms by signing below. 

Sincerely, 
 CHOBANI GLOBAL HOLDINGS, LLC 

By: /s/ Kathleen
Leo                         
 Name:
Kathleen Leo 
 Title: Secretary 
 AGREED AND ACCEPTED: 

/s/ Hamdi
Ulukaya                             

Hamdi Ulukaya
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7307
COLLIS MILLER, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-92-2063-3-22) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Collis Miller, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. South Carolina , No. CA-92-2063-3-22 (D.S.C. July 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 18.104 May a tribe include provisions in its tribal probate code regarding the distribution and descent of trust personalty?

No. All trust personalty will be distributed in accordance with the American Indian Probate Reform Act of 2004, as amended.
#### § 213.41 Leases executed but not approved before restrictions removed from land.

Leases executed before the removal of restrictions against alienation on land from all of which restrictions against alienation shall be removed after such execution, if such leases contain specific provisions for approval by the Secretary of the Interior, whether now filed with the Department or presented for consideration hereafter, will be considered and acted upon by this Department as heretofore but only for the purpose of approving or disapproving the instrument.
# C_2014012EN.01000101.xml

| 16.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 12/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 10.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37481 (13/N) |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Region | — | Article 107(3)(c) |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Förlängning av den godkända statliga stödordningen N 152/07 (regional transportstödordning) |
| Legal basis | Förordning om ändring i förordningen (2000:281) om regionalt transportbidrag (Decree on amendments of the decree 2000:281 on regional transport aid). |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Regional development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: SEK 224 432 000 |

Date of adoption of the decision

10.12.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37481 (13/N)

Member State

Sweden

Region

—

Article 107(3)(c)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Förlängning av den godkända statliga stödordningen N 152/07 (regional transportstödordning)

Legal basis

Förordning om ändring i förordningen (2000:281) om regionalt transportbidrag (Decree on amendments of the decree 2000:281 on regional transport aid).

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Regional development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: SEK 224 432 000

| | Annual budget: SEK 224 432 000 |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: SEK 224 432 000

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

1.1.2014-30.6.2014

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

| Tillväxtverket (Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth) |
| --- |
| Box 4404 |
| SE-102 61 Stockholm |
| SVERIGE |

Tillväxtverket (Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth)

Box 4404

SE-102 61 Stockholm

SVERIGE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### §§ 500.104-500.109 [Reserved]
# C_2014092EN.01004301.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/43

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014

2014/C 92/16

On page 34, the text referring to the State Aid No SA.37822 is cancelled and replaced by the following:

‘Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 18.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37822 (2013/N) |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | RHEINLAND-PFALZ | Mixed |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Rheinland-Pfalz; „Beihilfe zu den Kosten der Entfernung und Beseitigung gefallener Tiere, für die Beiträge zur Tierseuchenkasse gezahlt werden“ |
| Legal basis | Landesgesetz zur Ausführung des Tierische Nebenprodukte-Beseitigungsgesetzes (AGTierNebG) von 2010 |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Animal diseases |
| Form of aid | Subsidized services |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 30 (in millions) |

Date of adoption of the decision

18.12.2013

Aid number

SA.37822 (2013/N)

Member State

Germany

Region

RHEINLAND-PFALZ

Mixed

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Rheinland-Pfalz; „Beihilfe zu den Kosten der Entfernung und Beseitigung gefallener Tiere, für die Beiträge zur Tierseuchenkasse gezahlt werden“

Legal basis

Landesgesetz zur Ausführung des Tierische Nebenprodukte-Beseitigungsgesetzes (AGTierNebG) von 2010

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Animal diseases

Form of aid

Subsidized services

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 30 (in millions)

| | Annual budget: EUR 5 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 5 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2019

Economic sectors

Animal production

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministerium für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft, Ernährung,Weinbau und Forsten |
| --- |
| Kaiser-Friedrich-Straße 1 |

Ministerium für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft, Ernährung,Weinbau und Forsten

Kaiser-Friedrich-Straße 1

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm’

---
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.183 What other administrative appeals processes also apply? The administrative appeal processes in 25 CFR part 2 and 43 CFR part 4, subject to the limitations in § 224.184, apply to: ( a ) An interested party's appeal from an adverse decision or inaction by the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs under § 224.182; and
( b ) An appeal by a Tribe or a person or entity that has entered into a lease, business agreement, or right-of-way from an adverse decision by or the inaction of a Departmental official taken under this part.