alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006184EN.01000701.xml

| 8.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4261 — 3i/ABX)

(2006/C 184/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 August 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4261. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4261. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—PUNITIVE MATTERS

Sec.
950p.
Definitions; construction of certain offenses; common circumstances.
950q.
Principals.
950r.
Accessory after the fact.
950s.
Conviction of lesser offenses.
950t.
Crimes triable by military commission.
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.60 What will the Secretary provide to the Tribe after the application consultation meeting?

Within 30 days following the meeting with the Tribe, the Secretary will provide to the Designated Tribal Official a written report on the application consultation meeting. The report must include the Secretary's recommendations, if any, for revising the proposed TERA that was submitted as part of the Tribe's application.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-8037

VONTE’ AVON GAFFNEY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

F. B. BISHOP, JR.; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:12-cv-03168-RDB)

Submitted: May 28, 2014 Decided: June 6, 2014

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vonte’ Avon Gaffney, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Vonte’ Avon Gaffney seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack,

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Gaffney has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# C_2006190EN.01003301.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/33

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 June 2006 –Beau v Commission

(Case F-39/05) (1)

1

(Occupational disease - Refusal to recognise the occupational origin of the applicant's disease)

(2006/C 190/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Yolande Beau (Paris, France) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and K. Herrmann, agents, assisted by F. Longfils, lawyer)

Defendant:

:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 3 August 2004 in which the Commission of the European Communities refused to accede to the request for recognition of the occupational origin of the applicant's disease and charging to her the fees and incidental costs of the doctor nominated by her and half of the fees and incidental costs of the third doctor

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 205 of 20.08.2005 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-215/05 and transferred to the European Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
# C_2006233EN.01000101.xml

| 28.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 September 2006

(2006/C 233/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2684 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4595 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67105 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2770 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5796 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,77 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2650 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5767 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,413 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9782 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5350 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,443 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8965 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6915 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4143 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8784 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9264 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0156 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 196,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6795 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0229 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3945 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 681,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,670 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,693 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9790 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,603 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2684

JPY

Japanese yen

148,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4595

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67105

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2770

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5796

ISK

Iceland króna

88,77

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2650

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5767

CZK

Czech koruna

28,413

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9782

RON

Romanian leu

3,5350

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,443

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8965

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6915

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4143

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8784

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9264

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0156

KRW

South Korean won

1 196,86

ZAR

South African rand

9,6795

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0229

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3945

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 681,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,670

PHP

Philippine peso

63,693

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9790

THB

Thai baht

47,603

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 413

Expressing support for a National Foster Parents Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 2000

Mr. GILCHREST submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing support for a National Foster Parents Day.

Whereas the family, serving as the primary source of love,

identity, self-esteem, and support, is the very foundation

of our communities, and our United States;

Whereas over 142,000 foster families, who open their homes

and hearts to children whose families are in crisis, play

a vital role in helping children heal and reconnect and in

launching those children into successful adulthood;

Whereas 20,000 youth reach their 18th birthday and ‘‘age

out’’ of foster care, too often unprepared and without the

ongoing support and guidance of caring adults; and

Whereas numerous individuals and public and private organizations work to increase public awareness of the needs of

children in foster care and leaving it as well as the endur-
2

•HRES 413 IH

ing and valuable contribution of foster parents: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) a National Foster Parents Day should be

4 established to recognize the contributions of foster

5 parents across the Nation; and

6 (2) the President should issue a proclamation

7 calling on the people of the United States and inter8 ested groups to conduct appropriate ceremonies, ac9 tivities, and programs to demonstrate support for

10 foster parents across the Nation.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00                    0.00


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the condensed consolidated financial statements of Allscripts, Inc. as of and
for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         110,478
<SECURITIES>                                    31,886
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,442
<INVENTORY>                                      3,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,852
<PP&E>                                          12,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,664
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           263
<OTHER-SE>                                     176,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,312
<SALES>                                          9,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,647
<CGS>                                            7,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,183)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,286)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   4,243
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,043)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
From: Emmanuel Quizon [equizon@aqmd.gov]

Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 4:10 PM

To: Land, Eva

Subject: Particulate Emissions from Spraying Operation

Attachments: Rule 1469.1 Adopted 3-4-05.DOC; GuidelPMEmisCalcuSprayCoatingO.pdf

Eva,

Below is the equation and the filter control efficiency we used for calculating particulate emissions from 

spraying operation. For spray equipment other than HVLP or electrostatic spray gun we use a transfer 

efficiency of 35% unless test data on the spray gun transfer efficiency is provided and approved by the 

SCAQMD. For open spray equipment we use a fall-out factor of 20%. No fall-out factor is given for 

coating operation using a spray booth because all the overspray should be collected by the spray booth.

For wet coating operation we assume that 50% of PM is PM10. For powder coating operation we 

assume that PM is equal to PM10.

If you have any question you can give me a call at (909) 396-2523.

Emmanuel
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 400 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 400

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding Earth 
                                  Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 1999

 Mr. Udall of New Mexico submitted the following resolution; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding Earth 
                                  Day.

Whereas 20 million Americans participated in the first national celebration of 
        Earth Day on April 22, 1970, greatly increasing environmental awareness 
        nationwide;
Whereas Earth Day has been celebrated every year since then by an increasing 
        number of Americans, and is now observed in more than 140 countries;
Whereas Earth day calls attention to harmful human impacts on the natural 
        environment, including air pollution, water pollution, ocean pollution, 
        stratospheric pollution, and the disposal of hazardous wastes;
Whereas Earth Day alerts the world to environmental threats to human health and 
        well-being as well as the loss of native forests, wetlands, prairies, 
        marine ecosystems, and other wildlife habitats and wilderness areas, and 
        the diverse species that inhabit them; and
Whereas Earth Day educates the public about positive opportunities to improve 
        the world by improving energy efficiency, developing safe and renewable 
        energy sources, eliminating the production of harmful wastes, protecting 
        biodiversity, encouraging sustainable development throughout the world, 
        and designing goods to be durable, reusable, and recyclable: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
Earth Day should be officially established to draw attention to the 
impact of human activity on the natural environment, alert the world to 
environmental threats to human health and well-being, and advocate 
personal actions and public policies to promote and preserve a healthy, 
diverse, resilient, and productive world for our children.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006156EN.01000101.xml

| 5.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 July 2006

(2006/C 156/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2791 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4605 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69285 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1883 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5677 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 96,15 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9700 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,443 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,96 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0138 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5586 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,385 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9740 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7150 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4205 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9360 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0951 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0197 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 206,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,9853 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2245 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2490 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 593,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,658 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,357 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,454 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2791

JPY

Japanese yen

146,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4605

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69285

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1883

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5677

ISK

Iceland króna

96,15

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9700

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,443

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,96

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0138

RON

Romanian leu

3,5586

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,385

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9740

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7150

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4205

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9360

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0951

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0197

KRW

South Korean won

1 206,70

ZAR

South African rand

8,9853

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2245

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2490

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 593,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,658

PHP

Philippine peso

67,357

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3500

THB

Thai baht

48,454

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 292.23 What happens if the Governor does not affirmatively concur with the Secretarial Determination? ( a ) If the Governor provides a written non-concurrence with the Secretarial Determination: ( 1 ) The applicant tribe may use the newly acquired lands only for non-gaming purposes; and
( 2 ) If a notice of intent to take the land into trust has been issued, then the Secretary will withdraw that notice pending a revised application for a non-gaming purpose.
( b ) If the Governor does not affirmatively concur in the Secretarial Determination within one year of the date of the request, the Secretary may, at the request of the applicant tribe or the Governor, grant an extension of up to 180 days.
( c ) If no extension is granted or if the Governor does not respond during the extension period, the Secretarial Determination will no longer be valid.