alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF EDWARD J. BOREY PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Edward J. Borey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2006



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|/S/ EDWARD J. BOREY                                  
|Edward J. Borey President and Chief Executive Officer
### §9451. Cadets: deficiencies in conduct or studies; effect of failure on successor

(a) A cadet who is reported as deficient in conduct or studies and recommended to be discharged from the Academy may not, unless recommended by the Academy Board, be returned or reappointed to the Academy.

(b) Any cadet who fails to pass a required examination because he is deficient in any one subject of instruction is entitled to a reexamination of equal scope and difficulty in that subject, if he applies in writing to the Superintendent within 10 days after he is officially notified of his failure. The reexamination shall be held within 60 days after the date of his application. If the cadet passes the reexamination and is otherwise qualified, he shall be readmitted to the Academy. If he fails, he may not have another examination.

(c) The failure of a member of a graduating class to complete the course with his class does not delay the admission of his successor.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 566, §9351; renumbered §9451, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(a)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9351(a)9351(b)9351(c) | 10:1104.10:1103.10:1092b (1st proviso). | Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 314 (3d, 4th, and 5th provisos under "Permanent Establishment"), 39 Stat. 493. |
| | | R.S. 1325. |
| | | June 30, 1950, ch. 421, §2 (1st proviso), 64 Stat. 304. |

9351(b)

9351(c)

10:1103.

10:1092b (1st proviso).

In subsection (a), 10:1104 (last 20 words) is omitted as superseded by section 8287(d) of this title.

In subsection (b), the words "is entitled to" are substituted for the words "shall have the right to apply". The words "of equal scope and difficulty in that subject" are substituted for the words "by compliance with the requirements existing at the time of the first examination".

In subsection (c), the words "by reason of sickness, or deficiency in his studies, or other cause" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 9351 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
(logo) pwc 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of

Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank,

National Association ("Midland" or the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item

1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed

securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2014 and for the year then ended, excluding

criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii),

1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing

activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's

compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's

assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company

Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,

evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other

procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected

asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities

related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and

performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures

were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the

period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from

errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or

amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that

our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal

determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable

servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all

material respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 25, 2015

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106

T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Legal Resources 
-  Reducing Regulatory Burden 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Reducing Regulatory Burden

In response to Executive Order 13563 on Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review (January 18, 2011), PBGC issued its plan to review its regulations to ease administrative burden, simplify filings, and provide relief for small businesses and plans. PBGC’s plan addresses priorities for review, issues in review (for example, does a regulation accomplish its stated goals), and how regulations will be selected for review, among other things. The public is encouraged to submit comments on PBGC’s review plan at any time or to nominate regulations to review. Please send comments to regs.comments@pbgc.gov. All comments will be posted on this page under the heading of Public Comments.

### Relief Measures

                          - Administrative Review of Information Penalties  (4/16/12)
                          - Premium Penalty Relief for Certain Delinquent Plans  (2/09/12)
                          - PBGC Gives Premium-Related Relief to Pension Sponsors  (9/14/11)

### Documents

                          - PBGC Retrospective Review Plan Report  (July 2016)
                          - PBGC Retrospective Review Plan Report  (January 2016)
                          - PBGC Retrospective Review Plan Report  (February 2015)
                          - PBGC Retrospective Review Plan Report  (7/14/14)
                          - PBGC Retrospective Review Plan Report  (1/13/14)
                          - PBGC Retrospective Review Plan Report  (7/8/13)
                          - PBGC Retrospective Review Plan Report  (1/14/13)
                          - PBGC Retrospective Review Plan Report  (5/12)
                          - PBGC Retrospective Review Plan Report  (1/9/12)
                          - PBGC’s Final Plan for Regulatory Review  (8/23/11)
                          - PBGC’s Preliminary Plan for Regulatory Review  (5/26/11)
                          - Request for Comments on Developing Preliminary Plan for Regulatory Review  (4/1/11)

### Public Comments

                          - Comments on Final Plan (when received)
                          - Comments on Final Plan Submitted via SlideShare  (after 8/23/11)
                          - Comments on Developing Preliminary Plan  (4/15-20/11)

September 9, 2021
#### § 37.110 Who determines geographic attendance areas?

The Tribal governing body or the Secretary determines geographic attendance areas.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,218,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                   345,397
<INVENTORY>                                    543,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,519,484
<PP&E>                                       2,022,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                 344,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,611,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,054,366
<BONDS>                                      4,186,309
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,944
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,244,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,611,103
<SALES>                                        382,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,743,625
<CGS>                                          352,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,948,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,806,525<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               183,527
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,026,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,221,310)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (118,987)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,102,323
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,102,323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other costs and expenses include depreciation ($131,834), amortization of
intangible assets ($500,005), rent ($152,909), general and administration
($617,163), and consulting expenses ($355,150).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(logo) CoreLogic®

 

(logo)NTS

NATIONAL

TAXSEARCH

 

130S. Jefferson Street

Suite300

Chicago,IL 60661

 

 

REPORTON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGECOMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

Forthe calendar year ending December 31, 2019, National Tax Search, LLC has been aTax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the "Servicer").

 

NationalTax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as ofDecember 31, 2019 and for the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31,2019 (the "Reporting Period ") with the servicing criteria set forthin Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the"CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by theServicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Onlyservicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "ApplicableServicing Criteria" ) are applicable to the activities NTS performs withrespect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that theremaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation ABare not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to thetransactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this reportinclude all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system(the "Platform Transactions").

 

NTS,as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteriafor the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in allmaterial respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31,2019 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactionstaken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issuedan attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the ApplicableServicing Criteria as of December 31, 2019 and for the Reporting Period as setforth in this assertion.

 

 

NationalTax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/Lori D. Eshoo

LoriD. Eshoo

Executive,Operations

January30, 2020
Exhibit 99.8







| |                                     |                            
| | ----------------------------------- | ---------------------------
| | kpmg
    LLP                        | Telephone(403)
    691-8000
| | 205
    - 5th Avenue SW             | Fax(403)
    691-8008      
| | Suite
    3100, Bow Valley Square 2 | www.kpmg.ca                
| | Calgary
    AB                      |                            
| | T2P
    4B9                         |                            







Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Pembina Pipeline Corporation

We consent to the use of our report dated February  26,
2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in this annual report on Form 40-F.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such
reports in the Registration Statements (No. 333-187938) on Form F-3 of Pembina Pipeline Corporation.



Chartered Accountants
February 26, 2014
Calgary, Canada













KPMG
LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG

network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative

(“KPMG International”),
a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.



KPMG Confidential
### [§§2314, 2315. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1807(e)(4), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4159]

Section 2314, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 133; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(78), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2927; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §822(b)(2), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1706; Pub. L. 111–350, §5(b)(16), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3843; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, §1071(a)(4), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3504; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1807(e)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4158, related to laws inapplicable to agencies named in section 2303 of this title. Text of section 2314 was transferred to section 3068(a) of this title.

Section 2315, added Pub. L. 97–86, title IX, §908(a)(1), Dec. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 1117; amended Pub. L. 97–295, §1(25), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1291; Pub. L. 104–106, div. E, title LVI, §5601(c), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title X, §1074(b)(4)(B), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2660; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1073(a)(49), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1903; Pub. L. 107–217, §3(b)(5), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1295; Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title IX, §906(c), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2354; Pub. L. 113–283, §2(e)(5)(C), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3087; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title X, §1081(a)(7), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1001; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1807(e)(3), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4159; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(b)(2)(C)(ii), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2132, related to law inapplicable to procurement of automatic data processing equipment and services for certain defense purposes. Text of section 2315 was transferred to section 3068(b) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### Torphy *v.*Ketcham.

[No. 12,090.

Filed February 20, 1925.]

Landlord and *Tenant.—Subtenant may be dispossessed at expiration of lease notwithstanding tender of*rent.—A landlord may dispossess a subtenant who holds over after the expiration of the lease for a specific term, even though the latter tenders the rent at the rate specified in the lease.

From Lawrence Circuit Court; *James A. Cox,*Judge.

Action by Anna Ketcham against David Torphy. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*492
      *Robert L. Mellen, for appellant.*

*Clark & Brooks,*for appellee.

Nichols, J.

Appellant occupied a part of certain real estate here involved as sublessee of the Quinn Plumbing Company, which company had leased the real estate from one Pari Ketcham, then the owner thereof. The lessor thereafter died and appellee thereby became the owner of said real estate. The lease was for three years and expired January 1, 1923. Appellant refused to surrender his possession of -said real estate at the expiration of the lease and this possessory action resulted. At the trial, appellee’s evidence sustained the foregoing facts. Appellant offered no evidence except his receipt for rental money paid to the clerk as a tender, and there was a verdict and judgment for appellee. Appellant now prosecutes this appeal assigning as error the court’s action in overruling his motion for a new trial, which presents the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury. There is no merit in this appeal.

Affirmed.
### [§2410d. Renumbered §3903]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 2410d was renumbered section 4704 of this title.
# EUR-Lex - 52014XC0227(02) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52014XC0227(02)

**Draft Commission Regulation (EU) No …/… of 24 February 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 as regards its period of application Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 056 , 27/02/2014 P. 0001 - 0002 *

Draft Commission Regulation (EU) No .../...

of 24 February 2014

amending Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 as regards its period of application

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 56/02

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 246/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty [1] to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies (consortia) [2], and in particular Article 1 thereof,

Having published a draft of this Regulation [3]

After consulting the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 [4] grants a block exemption to liner shipping consortia from the prohibition contained in Article 101(1) of the Treaty, subject to certain conditions. That Regulation will expire on 25 April 2015, in accordance with the maximum 5 year duration provided for in Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 246/2009. On the basis of the Commission’s experience in applying the block exemption, it appears that the justifications for a block exemption for consortia are still valid and that the conditions on the basis of which the scope and content of Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 were determined have not substantially changed.

(2) Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 simplified and introduced substantial modifications to the rules applicable to consortia. Since the new legal framework has been in place/applied for only short period of time, further changes should be avoided at this stage. This will avoid increasing the compliance costs of the operators in the industry.

(3) The period of application of Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 should therefore be extended by five years,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 " 25 April 2015" is replaced by " 25 April 2020".

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 April 2015.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 February 2014.

For the Commission

The President

[...] [...]

[1] With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty have become respectively Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.

[2] OJ L 79, 25.3.2009, p. 1.

[3] OJ C 56, 27.2.2014, p. 1.

[4] Commission Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 of 28 September 2009 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies (consortia) (OJ L 256, 29.9.2009. p. 31).

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 213.48 Effective date.

The regulations in this part shall become effective and in full force from and after the date of approval (Apr. 27, 1938), and shall be subject to change or alteration at any time by the Secretary of the Interior: *Provided,* That no regulations made after the approval of any lease shall operate to affect the term of the lease, rate of royalty, rental, or acreage unless agreed to by both parties to the lease. All former regulations governing the leasing of individually owned lands of the Five Civilized Tribes for mining purposes are superseded by the regulations in this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 573 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 12, 2000.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable Herbert H. Bateman, a Representative from the Commonwealth of 
Virginia.
    Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the House as the Speaker may 
designate, together with such Members of the Senate as may be joined, be 
appointed to attend the funeral.
    Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be authorized and directed 
to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these 
resolutions and that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid out 
of applicable accounts of the House.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```