alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To
the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:



We
have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial
Real Estate Services, Inc. (the "Company"), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform"), as of December
31, 2013 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by
it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.



Our
examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may
have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the
Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.



In
our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2013 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served
as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.









February
14, 2014













PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite
1800, Dallas, Texas 75201

T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
### §8017. Secretary of the Navy: successors to duties

If the Secretary of the Navy dies, resigns, is removed from office, is absent, or is disabled, the person who is highest on the following list, and who is not absent or disabled, shall perform the duties of the Secretary until the President, under section 3347 1 of title 5, directs another person to perform those duties or until the absence or disability ceases:

(1) The Under Secretary of the Navy.

(2) The Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, in the order prescribed by the Secretary of the Navy and approved by the Secretary of Defense.

(3) The General Counsel of the Department of the Navy.

(4) The Chief of Naval Operations.

(5) The Commandant of the Marine Corps.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §511(c)(4), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1047, §5017; amended Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, §902(b), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2823; renumbered §8017, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 3347 of title 5, referred to in text, was repealed and a new section 3347 was enacted by Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title I, §151(b), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–611, and, as so enacted, no longer contains provisions authorizing the President to direct temporary successors to duties. See section 3345 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 5036 of this title prior to enactment of Pub. L. 99–433.

A prior section 8017 was renumbered section 9017 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5017 of this title as this section.

1994—Pars. (3) to (5). Pub. L. 103–337 added par. (3) and redesignated former pars. (3) and (4) as (4) and (5), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Order of Succession

For order of succession in event of death, permanent disability, or resignation of Secretary of the Navy, see Ex. Ord. No. 12879, Nov. 8, 1993, 58 F.R. 59929, listed in a table under section 3345 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Reporting & Disclosure 
-  Reporting and Disclosure Requirements 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Reporting and disclosure requirements

                          - Reporting requirements
                          - Disclosure requirements

## Reporting requirements

 

## Disclosure requirements

January 23, 2024
### §8463. Midshipmen: discharge for deficiency

Midshipmen found deficient at any examination shall, unless the Academic Board recommends otherwise, be discharged from the Naval Academy and from the naval service.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 433, §6963; renumbered §8463, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6963 | 34 U.S.C. 1053. | R.S. 1519; restored Oct. 22, 1921, ch. 113, §2, 42 Stat. 207. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6963 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 36.24 Standard IX—Secondary instructional program. ( a ) The secondary instructional program shall reflect the philosophy of the student, tribe, community, and school, and an awareness of the changing world.
( b ) The secondary instructional curriculum shall include the following content areas: ( 1 ) Language arts (communication skills).
( 2 ) Sciences.
( 3 ) Mathematics.
( 4 ) Social studies.
( 5 ) Fine arts and practical arts.
( 6 ) Physical education.
( 7 ) Languages other than English.
( 8 ) Driver education. (See guidelines available from the applicable State Department of Education.)
( 9 ) *Vocational education.* Curriculum shall be designed and directly related to actual occupational trends (national, regional, and local) and to introduce and familiarize students with various occupations in technology, industry and business, as well as required special skills and the training requisites. Programs shall be directed toward assisting students in making career choices and developing consumer skills and may include the following: ( i ) Vocational exploration,
( ii ) Vocational skill development, and
( iii ) School/on-the-job cooperative education programs.
( c ) The following shall be integrated into the curriculum: ( 1 ) Consumer economics (including personal finances),
( 2 ) Metric education,
( 3 ) Safety education, and
( 4 ) Health education. (In addition, the program shall meet the requirements contained in 24 Stat. 69.)
( d ) The high school program shall provide program coordination with feeder schools, career direction, and preparation for the student entering independent living through employment, post-secondary education, and/or marriage.
( e ) Yearly class schedules shall take into account the graduation requirements of each student.
( f ) Student enrollment in any laboratory or vocational class shall be consistent with applicable health and safety standards.
( g ) Schools are encouraged to provide alternative programs that lead to high school completion for secondary students who do not function successfully in the regular academic setting.
[50 FR 36816, Sept. 9, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 61765, Dec. 1, 1994]
May 29 , 2015

Mr. Brett Kruger Division Chief U.S. Air Carrier Licensing United States Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Re : Application of American Airlines for Amendment of Statements of Authorization and Notice of Additional American Eagle Operators (Docket s DOT - OST - 1999 - 4994, DOT - OST - 1999 - 6544, DOT - OST 1999 - 6546, DOT - OST - 2000 - 6824, DOT - OST - 2002 - 13861, DOT - OST 2008 - 0252, DOT - OST - 2004 - 19965, DOT - OST - 2006 - 26716, DOT - OST 2007 - 0034, DOT - OST - 2007 - 0078, DOT - OST - 2007 - 0095, DOT - OST 2008 - 0044, DOT - OST - 2008 - 0138, DOT - OST - 2008 - 0195, DOT - OST 2009 - 0154, DOT - OST - 2010 - 0192, DOT - OST - 2011 - 0040, DOT - OST 2011 - 0197, DOT - OST - 2011 - 0210, DOT - O ST - 2011 - 0228, DOT - OST 2012 - 0092, DOT - OST - 2012 - 0208, DOT - OST - 2012 - 0209, DOT - OST 2013 - 0007, DOT - OST - 2013 - 0022, DOT - OST - 2015 - 0010, DOT - OST 2015 - 0018)

Dear Mr. Kruger : We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding American Airlines’ Application for Amendment of Statements of Authorization and Notice of Additional American Eagle Operators. We received no objections. Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited treatment of this Application. Sincerely,

Abigail Donovan Director, Congressional and Federal Affairs

11 01 17 th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 ( 202 ) 326

- 5 15 4 Fax: ( 202 ) 898

- 4810CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that, on May 29 , 2015 , I caused to be served a copy of the foregoing Letter by email upon those addressees listed below: englets@state.gov (Department of State) cristinasa@state.go v (Department of State) brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation) brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation) john.s.duncan@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration) dan.weiss@united.com (United) steve.morrissey@united.com (United) gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United) sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta) chris.walker@delta (Delta) robert.land@jetblue.com (JetBlue) esahr@eckertseamans.com (Counsel for JetBlue) dderco@eckertseamans.com (Counsel for JetBlue) jhill@cooley.com (Counsel for Hawaiian) perkmann@cooley.com (Counsel for Hawaiian) jeremy.ross@alaskaair.com (Alaska) dheffernan@cozen.com (Counsel for Alaska) jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit) dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit) bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Sou thwest) leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest) john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country) thomas.ting@suncountry.com (Sun Country) matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Frontier) slachter@cozen.com (Counsel for Frontier) barbara.russell@virginamerica.com ( V irgin America )

______________________ Abigail Donovan
#### § 293.21 May a compact or amendment include provisions addressing standards for the operation of gaming activity and maintenance of the gaming facility?

Yes. A compact or amendment may include provisions addressing the Tribe's standards for the operation of the gaming activity within gaming spaces, as well as the Tribe's standards for the maintenance of the gaming facility, including licensing. If a compact or amendment mandates that the Tribe adopt standards equivalent or comparable to the standards set forth in a State law or regulation, the parties must show that these mandated Tribal standards are both directly related to and necessary for the licensing and regulation of the gaming activity.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7922 SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X, a/k/a Michael Wayne Montgomery, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD BUNDRICK, Inmate Relations Coordinator at the Maximum Security Unit; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-741-6-3AK) Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: May 30, 1996 Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. X v. Bundrick , No. CA-95-741-6-3AK (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2006212EN.01001101.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Charleroi lodged on 30 May 2006 — SA Sporting du Pays de Charleroi, G-14 Groupment des clubs de football européens v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA)

(Case C-243/06)

(2006/C 212/18)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de commerce de Charleroi

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: SA Sporting du Pays de Charleroi, G-14 Groupment des clubs de football européens

Applicants:

Defendant: Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA)

Defendant:

Question referred

Do the obligations on clubs and football players having employment contracts with those clubs imposed by the provisions of FIFA's statutes and regulations providing for the obligatory release of players to national federations without compensation and the unilateral and binding determination of the coordinated international match calendar constitute unlawful restrictions of competition or abuses of a dominant position or obstacles to the exercise of the fundamental freedoms conferred by the EC Treaty and are they therefore contrary to Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty or to any other provision of Community law, particularly Articles 39 and 49 of the Treaty?

---
# CA2006252EN.01000601.xml

| 18.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 252/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 252/6

---

RESERVE LIST

RESERVE LIST

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/9/05

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/9/05

ASSISTANTS (AST 3)

ASSISTANTS (AST 3)

IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

(Irish language)

(2006/C 252 A/03)

| CONNOR | Edel |
| --- | --- |
| NÍ ÚRDAIL | Róisín |
| UÍ MHAOLAOÍ | Nóirín |

CONNOR

Edel

NÍ ÚRDAIL

Róisín

UÍ MHAOLAOÍ

Nóirín

---
H. Res. 44

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 11, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 437) to provide for a Chief Financial Officer

in the Executive Office of the President. The first reading of

the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Government Reform. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. During

consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the

Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition

on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment

has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule

XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read.
2

•HRES 44 EH

The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HealthSouth Corporation. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | October 28, 2016 |   |   |   |
|   |   | By: | /s/ JAY GRINNEY |   |
|   |   |   | Jay Grinney |   |
|   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
USGS Home Contact USGS Search USGS 

### National Water Information System: Web Interface

USGS Water Resources Data Category: Surface Water Geographic Area:

United States GO News updated Nov, 2011 

# USGS Surface-Water Monthly Statistics for the Nation The statistics generated from this site are based on approved daily-mean data and may not match those published by the USGS in official publications. The user is responsible for assessment and use of statistics from this site. For more details on why the statistics may not match, click here . 

### USGS 02326550 AUCILLA RIVER NR MOUTH NEAR NUTALL RISE, FL

Available data for this site Time-series: Monthly statistics GO Taylor County, Florida Hydrologic Unit Code 03110103 Latitude 30°06'43.7", Longitude 83°58'47.6" NAD27 Drainage area 938.6 square miles Contributing drainage area 938.6 square miles HTML table of all data Tab-separated data Reselect output format Output formats

00480, Salinity, water, unfiltered, parts per thousand, YEAR Monthly mean in ppth (Calculation Period: 2002-10-01 -> 2009-10-31)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2002 7.81 4.50 2003 0.06 0.10 0.57 0.21 0.15 0.10 1.65 5.00 2.07 2.57 2004 2.89 0.74 0.31 1.15 1.29 0.62 1.74 0.74 0.10 0.93 0.49 2005 0.35 1.22 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.36 0.74 0.75 3.87 5.97 1.06 2006 0.57 0.18 0.15 0.62 1.16 3.54 3.60 4.43 4.69 8.10 8.17 7.62 2007 2.57 0.99 1.33 3.31 6.02 4.44 6.35 10.34 8.95 12.53 15.06 13.12 2008 11.93 6.60 2.43 3.81 5.28 5.19 6.81 4.03 1.53 8.27 12.32 4.04 2009 0.07 1.08 2.09 4.80 5.13 5.05 8.68 Mean of monthly Salinity 3.7 1.9 0.7 1.3 2.2 2.4 3.5 4.1 3.8 7.2 7.0 4.8

** No Incomplete data have been used for statistical calculation Questions about sites/data? Data Tips 

### Page 1 of 2 USGS Surface Water data for USA: USGS Surface

-Water Monthly Statistics

1/9/2012 http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/monthly/?referred_module=sw&site_no=02326550&por_02326550

...Feedback on this web site Explanation of terms Automated retrievals Subscribe for system changes Help News Accessibility Plug-Ins FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey Title: Surface Water data for USA: USGS Surface-Water Monthly Statistics URL: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/monthly? Page Contact Information: Florida Integrated Science Center - Tallahassee Water Data Support Team Page Last Modified: 2012-01-09 16:22:01 EST 0.25 0.25 sdww01 

### Page 2 of 2 USGS Surface Water data for USA: USGS Surface

-Water Monthly Statistics

1/9/2012 http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/monthly/?referred_module=sw&site_no=02326550&por_02326550

...
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Michael John Coleman, also known as Mike Beasley, appellant.

228 N. W. 2d 618

Filed May 1, 1975.

No. 39834.

Michael John Coleman, pro se.

Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Gary B. Schneider, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ. .

Boslaugh, J.

The defendant was convicted of unlawful distribution of heroin and sentenced to imprisonment for 5 to 20 years. At the trial Hugh J. McGuire testified as an expert witness for the State. Later it was discovered McGuire had testified falsely concerning his academic qualifications. The defendant then filed a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

The motion was consolidated for hearing with a number of similar motions filed in other cases. After an evidentiary hearing the trial court: overruled the motion! The defendant has appealed. .

Thé question presented in this case was considered at length in State v. Glouser, *ante*p. 190, 226 N. W. 2d 328. *667The motion filed in the Glouser case was heard by the trial court at the same time as the motion filed in this case.

In the Glouser case we held the evidence as to McGuire’s background and training was sufficient to qualify him as an expert witness; and the newly discovered evidence concerning McGuire was of an impeaching character and not of such a controlling nature as probably would have changed the result. The decision in the Glouser case is controlling here.

The judgment of the District Court refusing to grant the defendant a new trial is affirmed.

Affirmed.
### [§18506. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §589(b)(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3279]

Section, added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §520(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1886, related to availability of funds for recognition items for Army Reserve personnel.
#### § 581.4 How do I file a motion before a presiding official?

Motion practice before a presiding official on appeals of notices of violation, orders of temporary closure, proposed civil fine assessments, the Chair's decisions to void or modify management contracts, the Commission's proposals to remove certificates of self-regulation, the Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission's minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees and late fee assessments is governed by § 584.4 of this subchapter.

[78 FR 21062, Apr. 9, 2013]