alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Chmiel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc.
for the period ended June 30, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2006
/s/Robert E. Chmiel
Robert E. Chmiel, Interim CFO (Principal Financial Officer)
### §921. Art. 121. Larceny and wrongful appropriation

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully takes, obtains, or withholds, by any means, from the possession of the owner or of any other person any money, personal property, or article of value of any kind—

(1) with intent permanently to deprive or defraud another person of the use and benefit of property or to appropriate it to his own use or the use of any person other than the owner, steals that property and is guilty of larceny; or

(2) with intent temporarily to deprive or defraud another person of the use and benefit of property or to appropriate it to his own use or the use of any person other than the owner, is guilty of wrongful appropriation.

(b) Any person found guilty of larceny or wrongful appropriation shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 73.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 921(a)921(b) | 50:715(a).50:715(b). | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 121), 64 Stat. 140. |

921(b)

50:715(b).

In subsection (a), the words "whatever" and "true" are omitted as surplusage. The word "it" is substituted for the words "the same" in clauses (1) and (2).
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 9, 2009

1215 

# Order

January 9, 2009

137437

RAQUEL RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, and

PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137437 COA: 285437 Wayne CC: 02-231906-CZ A.S.E. INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff, and

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC., and AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING, INC., Defendants, Cross-Defendants,

and

DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., INNOVATIVE ENGINEERING, INC., and PMI MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 23, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY , J., not participating.
confidential







ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE





Reference is hereby
made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special
Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying
Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2012-LC4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section
10.11 of this Agreement, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services and Timothy S. Ryan, Managing Director
of Customer Relationship Management, do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.





|                  |  |                  
|----------------- |  | -----------------
|Leslie Hayton     |  | Timothy S. Ryan  
|Managing Director |  | Managing Director
|Wells Fargo Bank  |  | Wells Fargo Bank 





















confidential
# C_2006252EN.01000101.xml

| 18.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 October 2006

(2006/C 252/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2524 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4556 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67080 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2694 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5895 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 85,54 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4710 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5767 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,323 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,72 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8958 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5125 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,57 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 36,833 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8548 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6616 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4232 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7456 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8876 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9800 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 195,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5498 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9042 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3880 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 465,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6032 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,545 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,7520 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,825 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2524

JPY

Japanese yen

148,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4556

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67080

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2694

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5895

ISK

Iceland króna

85,54

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4710

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5767

CZK

Czech koruna

28,323

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,72

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8958

RON

Romanian leu

3,5125

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,57

SKK

Slovak koruna

36,833

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8548

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6616

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4232

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7456

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8876

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9800

KRW

South Korean won

1 195,23

ZAR

South African rand

9,5498

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9042

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3880

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 465,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6032

PHP

Philippine peso

62,545

RUB

Russian rouble

33,7520

THB

Thai baht

46,825

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2006212EN.01001403.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/14

---

References for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Montpellier (France) lodged on 15 June 2006 — Daniel Pierre Raymond Escalier and Jean Louis François Bonnarel v Ministère public

(Case C-260/06 - Case C-261/06)

(2006/C 212/25)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d'appel de Montpellier

(3rd Criminal Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Cross-appellant: Ministère public

Cross-appellant:

Appellants: Daniel Pierre Raymond Escalier (C-260/06) and Jean Louis François Bonnarel (C-261/06)

Appellants:

Question referred

Where a Member State makes the importation of a plant protection product from another Member State in which the product has already been authorised to be placed on the market in accordance with Directive 91/414/EEC (1) subject to a simplified procedure for such authorisation in order to verify that the product imported meets the identity requirements laid down in Case C-100/96 The Queen v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte: British Agrochemicals Association Ltd [1999] ECR I-1499, is that Member State entitled to make an operator subject to that simplified authorisation procedure if:

1

The Queen

Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte: British Agrochemicals Association Ltd

| — | the importer is a farmer who is importing the product solely for the needs of his own farm, which are manifold but limited in quantity, and is therefore not placing it on the market in the commercial sense which that concept implies; |
| --- | --- |

—

the importer is a farmer who is importing the product solely for the needs of his own farm, which are manifold but limited in quantity, and is therefore not placing it on the market in the commercial sense which that concept implies;

| — | the simplified marketing authorisation procedure constituting import authorisation is personal to each operator/distributor, who is required to give the product imported its own brand name and is subject to a charge of EUR 800? |
| --- | --- |

—

the simplified marketing authorisation procedure constituting import authorisation is personal to each operator/distributor, who is required to give the product imported its own brand name and is subject to a charge of EUR 800?

If the reply to the first question is negative, can the judgment in Case C-212/03 Commission v France [2005] ECR I-4213 relating to personal imports of medicinal products by individuals be applied to the case of plant protection products imported by farmers solely for the needs of their own farms?

Commission

France

---

(1)  Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ 1991 L 230, p. 1).

1

---
### ATTACHMENT B – Part II, Section A, 2.

SANITIZED

Page 1 PART II, SECTION A, QUESTION (2)

A.(2) Identified below are the points during and after manufacturing where a person, at the manufacturing site, may be exposed to the PMN substance.
H. Res. 511

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 25, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3916) to amend the

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on

telephone and other communication services. The bill shall be

considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1)

one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 170.915 May Tribal employment taxes or fees be included in a TTP project budget?

Yes. The cost of Tribal employment taxes or fees may be included in the budget for a TTP project.
EXHIBIT 32

Section 906 Certification

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the
sole general partner of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 15, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 26, 2007



/s/ Christopher J. NassettaChristopher J. NassettaChief Executive Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc./s/ W. Edward WalterW. Edward WalterChief Financial Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §948r. Exclusion of statements obtained by torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment; prohibition of self-incrimination; admission of other statements of the accused

(a) Exclusion of Statements Obtain by Torture or Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment.—No statement obtained by the use of torture or by cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment (as defined by section 1003 of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 2000dd)), whether or not under color of law, shall be admissible in a military commission under this chapter, except against a person accused of torture or such treatment as evidence that the statement was made.

(b) Self-incrimination Prohibited.—No person shall be required to testify against himself or herself at a proceeding of a military commission under this chapter.

(c) Other Statements of the Accused.—A statement of the accused may be admitted in evidence in a military commission under this chapter only if the military judge finds—

(1) that the totality of the circumstances renders the statement reliable and possessing sufficient probative value; and

(2) that—

(A) the statement was made incident to lawful conduct during military operations at the point of capture or during closely related active combat engagement, and the interests of justice would best be served by admission of the statement into evidence; or

(B) the statement was voluntarily given.

(d) Determination of Voluntariness.—In determining for purposes of subsection (c)(2)(B) whether a statement was voluntarily given, the military judge shall consider the totality of the circumstances, including, as appropriate, the following:

(1) The details of the taking of the statement, accounting for the circumstances of the conduct of military and intelligence operations during hostilities.

(2) The characteristics of the accused, such as military training, age, and education level.

(3) The lapse of time, change of place, or change in identity of the questioners between the statement sought to be admitted and any prior questioning of the accused.

(Added by Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2580.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 948r, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2607; amended Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1063(a)(4), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 321, related to prohibition of compulsory self-incrimination and treatment of statements obtained by torture and other statements, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
# C_2006190EN.01000201.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 June 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-255/04) (1)

1

(Admissibility - Inconsistency between the grounds pleaded and the heads of claim in the application initiating proceedings - Rule whereby a Court may not rule ultra petita - Article 49 EC - National legislation making the grant of a licence subject to the needs of the market - National legislation imposing a presumption of salaried status - Reversal of the burden of proof - Absence of detailed procedural rules within the meaning of the Peterbroeck case-law - Social protection - Coordination of the applicable legislation by Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Pre-emption - Action to combat concealed employment)

(2006/C 190/03)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Traversa and A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and A. Hare, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 43 EC and 49 EC — French system for the grant of licences to performing artists established in another Member State who do not possess a licence issued under comparable conditions in their State of origin — Presumption of salaried status applied to performing artists recognised as service providers established in their State of origin where they usually provide similar services

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | By making the grant of a licence to performing artists' engagements agencies, established in another Member State, subject to the need to engage performers, and






  — | by imposing the presumption of salaried status on performing artists who are recognised as service providers and established in their Member State of origin, where they usually provide similar services, |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

By making the grant of a licence to performing artists' engagements agencies, established in another Member State, subject to the need to engage performers, and

—

by imposing the presumption of salaried status on performing artists who are recognised as service providers and established in their Member State of origin, where they usually provide similar services,

| — | the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 EC. |
| --- | --- |

—

the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 EC.

| 2. | The action is dismissed as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed as to the remainder.

| 3. | The Commission of the European Communities and the French Republic are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission of the European Communities and the French Republic are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 28.8.2004.

1

---
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 458

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued on the subject of autism awareness.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2000

Mr. BAKER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

a commemorative postage stamp should be issued on

the subject of autism awareness.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service on the

5 subject of autism awareness; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a postage stamp be issued.

Æ
§ 39.501 What is an emergency or unforeseen contingency? An emergency or unforeseen contingency is an event that meets all of the following criteria: ( a ) It could not be planned for;
( b ) It is not the result of mismanagement, malfeasance, or willful neglect;
( c ) It is not covered by an insurance policy in force at the time of the event;
( d ) The Assistant Secretary determines that Bureau cannot reimburse the emergency from the facilities emergency repair fund; and
( e ) It could not have been prevented by prudent action by officials responsible for the educational program.