alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 511 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 228
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 511

                          [Report No. 106-637]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3916) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on telephone and 
                     other communication services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2000

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3916) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on telephone and 
                     other communication services.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 3916) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
to repeal the excise tax on telephone and other communication services. 
The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment 
recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill 
shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as 
amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.

                                                 House Calendar No. 228

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. RES. 511   

                          [Report No. 106-637]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3916) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on telephone and 
                     other communication services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 23, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
**CERTIFICATIONS**

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Stellar Biotechnologies Inc. (the “Company”) doeshereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:

 

1. 	The Annual Report on Form 20-F ofthe Company for the year ended August 31, 2013 (the “Form 20-F”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. 	The information contained in theForm 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: December 31, 2013

 

*_/s/ “Frank Oakes”___*

Frank Oakes,

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

This certificate shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certificationwill not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
H. Res. 376

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 18, 1999.

Whereas approximately 80,000 infants, children, teenagers,

and young adults of families living throughout the United

States die each year from myriad causes;

Whereas the death of an infant, child, teenager, or young

adult of a family is considered to be one of the greatest

tragedies that a parent or family will ever endure during

a lifetime; and

Whereas a supportive environment and empathy and understanding are considered critical factors in the healing

process of a family that is coping with and recovering

from the loss of a loved one: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports

the goals and ideas of ‘‘National Children’s Memorial Day’’

in remembrance of the many infants, children, teenagers, and

young adults of families in the United States who have died.

Attest:

Clerk.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044 Retirement Assumptions 
-  Retirement Rate Category Tables 2015 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Retirement Rate Category Tables 2015

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main XRA webpage.

TABLE I-15 SELECTION OF RETIREMENT RATE CATEGORY(For plans with a valuation date after Dec. 31, 2014 and before Jan. 1, 2016)

 

January 13, 2022
STATE OF CALIFORNIA — THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

1516 Ninth Street, MS 14 Sacramento, California 95814

Main website: www.energy.ca.gov

January 12, 2011

United States Department of Energy (DOE)

Via e-mail: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

RE: Ex parte communication of the California Energy Commission

Docket No. EERE-2008-BT-STD-0005

To Whom It May Concern,

On January 6, 2011, Mike Leaon, Harinder Si ngh, Ken Rider, and Dennis Beck of the California Energy Commission (CEC) had a te lephone conversation with Victor Petrolati of DOE regarding the above referenced pr oceeding, concerning energy conservation standards for battery chargers and Cla ss A external power supplies.

The purpose of the meeting was for CEC and DOE staff to update each other on the status of the respective ru lemaking activities on the state and federal levels regarding battery chargers, including this proceeding; DOE’s proceeding to adopt test procedures for battery chargers and Class A external power supplies (Docket No. EERE-BT-TP0019); and CEC’s proceeding regarding efficien cy standards for battery chargers (CEC Docket No. 09-AAER-2).

Sincerely,

DENNIS L. BECK, JR.

Senior Staff Counsel
### §8041. Headquarters, Marine Corps: function; composition

(a) There is in the executive part of the Department of the Navy a Headquarters, Marine Corps. The function of the Headquarters, Marine Corps, is to assist the Secretary of the Navy in carrying out his responsibilities.

(b) The Headquarters, Marine Corps, is composed of the following:

(1) The Commandant of the Marine Corps.

(2) The Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps.

(3) The Deputy Commandants.

(4) The Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps.

(5) Other members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned or detailed to the Headquarters, Marine Corps.

(6) Civilian employees in the Department of the Navy assigned or detailed to the Headquarters, Marine Corps.

(c) Except as otherwise specifically prescribed by law, the Headquarters, Marine Corps, shall be organized in such manner, and its members shall perform such duties and have such titles, as the Secretary may prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §513(b), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1052, §5041; amended Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IX, §902(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–224; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title V, §531(c), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1726; renumbered §8041, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5041 of this title as this section.

2013—Subsec. (b)(4) to (6). Pub. L. 112–239 added par. (4) and redesignated former pars. (4) and (5) as (5) and (6), respectively.

2000—Subsec. (b)(3) to (7). Pub. L. 106–398 added par. (3), redesignated pars. (6) and (7) as (4) and (5), respectively, and struck out former pars. (3) to (5) which read as follows:

"(3) The Chief of Staff of the Marine Corps.

"(4) The Deputy Chiefs of Staff.

"(5) The Assistant Chiefs of Staff."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,195,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  439,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (21,702)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,759,832
<PP&E>                                       5,024,056
<DEPRECIATION>                                (97,643)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,904,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,462,527
<BONDS>                                      4,246,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          486,517
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,503,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,904,235
<SALES>                                        163,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               336,755
<CGS>                                          199,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               218,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                21,702
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (150,030)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,430)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (153,460)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 510 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 227
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 510

                          [Report No. 106-636]

    Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 4444) to 
   authorize extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
        relations treatment) to the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2000

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 4444) to 
   authorize extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
        relations treatment) to the People's Republic of China.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4444) to authorize 
extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations 
treatment) to the People's Republic of China. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. In lieu of the amendment recommended 
by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) three hours of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided 
among and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Ways and Means, Representative Stark of California or his 
designee, and Representative Rohrabacher of California or his designee; 
and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

                                                 House Calendar No. 227

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 510

                          [Report No. 106-636]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 4444) to 
   authorize extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
        relations treatment) to the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 23, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
§ 513.21 What notice will a debtor be given of the Commission's intent to collect a debt through administrative and tax refund offset? ( a ) The Commission will give the debtor written notice of its intent to offset before initiating the offset. Notice will be mailed to the debtor at the debtor's last known address as determined by the Commission.
( b ) The notice will state the amount of the debt and notify the debtor that: ( 1 ) The debt is past due and, unless repaid within 60 days after the date of the notice, the Commission will refer the debt to Treasury for administrative and tax refund offset;
( 2 ) The debtor has 60 calendar days to present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past-due or legally enforceable; and
( 3 ) The debtor has an opportunity to make a written agreement to repay the debt.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7190** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. TYREE TEKO SMITH , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:06

- cr - 01206

- D C N

- 1; 2:11

- cv - 70043

- DCN )

Submitted : December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tyree Teko Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tyree Teko Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2013 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability . 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sat isfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2006237EN.01000802.xml

| 30.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/8

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 20 July 2006 — GLOBE v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-114/06 R)

(Public procurement - Community tendering procedure - Procedure for interim relief - Prima facie case - Urgency)

(2006/C 237/15)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: GLOBE NV (Zandhoven, Belgium) (represented by: A. Abate, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Wilderspin and G. Boudot, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Suspension of the operation of the Commission's decision to reject the applicant's tender in connection with the tendering procedure for supplies to various countries in Central Asia (EuropeAid/122078/C/S/Multi).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The operation of the Commission's decision to award the tender to IGN France international in connection with the tendering procedure for supplies to various countries in Central Asia (EuropeAid/122078/C/S/Multi) and the performance of the contract concluded by the Commission with IGN France international are suspended until the Court of First Instance has ruled on the application in the main proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The operation of the Commission's decision to award the tender to IGN France international in connection with the tendering procedure for supplies to various countries in Central Asia (EuropeAid/122078/C/S/Multi) and the performance of the contract concluded by the Commission with IGN France international are suspended until the Court of First Instance has ruled on the application in the main proceedings.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2006179EN.01001301.xml

| 1.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4233 — BP France/Vitogaz/Energaz JV)

(2006/C 179/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4233. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4233. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 169.412 When will BIA issue a decision on an appeal from a right-of-way decision?

BIA will issue a decision on an appeal from a right-of-way decision within 60 days of receipt of all pleadings.
### [§1763. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VIII, §835(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1551]

Section, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XII, §1202(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1656; amended Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, §904(d)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1728; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1073(a)(33), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1902; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title X, §1048(b)(2), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1225, related to reassignment of authority by Secretary of Defense.
Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Update

As of March 31, 2023

Joint Task Force – Red Hill is currently ON PLAN to safely defuel the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility by June 2024

DoD Repairs Completed

172/253

Start Complete

Number of Validated Repairs Submitted 

to DOH for Review/Approval

Next 90 Days April 2023 May 2023 June 2023

April 5: JBPHH Info Fair (CAC holders)

April 6: Response Drill

April 12: Red Hill Special Committee Tour

April 17-21: Dewatering1

May 17: DISF

2 Fourth Meeting

May 23-24: Defueling Open House

May 31: Projected DoD Repairs Complete

June 6: FTAC

2 – Hosted by DOH

June 8: Response Drill

June 9: NEPA

2 Public Comment Period Begins

June 15: NEPA Public Meeting

June 30: NEPA Public Comment Period Ends

3

rd Party Quality Validation Completed 

97/253

Start Complete

Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Dashboard

As of April 12, 2023

Dashboard Legend 2

DISF: Defueling Information Sharing Forum

FTAC: Fuel Tank Advisory Committee

NEPA: National Environmental Policy Act Third-party quality validation is a means 

of confirming standards of quality have 

been met for all repairs to ensure safety 

and protect the environment. 

What is 3rd Party 

Quality Validation?

Next Key Milestone ... 

DEWATERING1. What is it?

Dewatering removes water from the tanks to 

ensure quality of fuel and to prevent corrosion. 

To learn more about this process, click the link 

here. 

Start Complete

Key Events

56/253
§ 2.3 Office of the Federal Register; location; office hours. ( a ) The Office of the Federal Register is a component of the National Archives and Records Administration.
( b ) The office is located at 732 N. Capitol Street NW, suite A-734, Washington, DC.
( c ) The mailing address is: Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408.
( d ) Office hours are 8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m., Monday through Friday, except for official Federal holidays.
[37 FR 23603, Nov. 4, 1972, as amended at 54 FR 9676, Mar. 7, 1989; 57 FR 40024, Sept. 1, 1992; 87 FR 80002, Dec. 29, 2022]