alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Publications List

Series:Crime Against People with Disabilities

##   Use Search Filters  

### Select Filters

### Enter search criteria

### Sort by

Crime Against Persons with Disabilities, 2009–2019 – Statistical TablesDate Published  November 2021SeriesCrime Against People with DisabilitiesPublication TypePublication

Crime Against Persons with Disabilities, 2009-2015 - Statistical TablesDate Published  July 2017SeriesCrime Against People with DisabilitiesPublication TypePublication

Crime Against Persons with Disabilities, 2009-2014 - Statistical TablesDate Published  November 2016SeriesCrime Against People with DisabilitiesPublication TypePublication

Crime Against Persons with Disabilities, 2009-2013 - Statistical TablesDate Published  May 2015SeriesCrime Against People with DisabilitiesPublication TypePublicationAgenciesBJS

Crime Against Persons with Disabilities, 2009-2012 - Statistical TablesDate Published  February 2014SeriesCrime Against People with DisabilitiesPublication TypePublicationAgenciesBJS

Crime Against Persons with Disabilities,  2009-2011 - Statistical TablesDate Published  December 2012SeriesCrime Against People with DisabilitiesPublication TypePublicationAgenciesBJS

Crime Against Persons with Disabilities, 2008-2010 - Statistical TablesDate Published  October 2011SeriesCrime Against People with DisabilitiesPublication TypeData TableAgenciesBJS

Crime Against People with Disabilities, 2008Date Published  December 2010SeriesCrime Against People with DisabilitiesPublication TypePublicationAgenciesBJS

Crime Against People with Disabilities, 2007Date Published  October 2009SeriesCrime Against People with DisabilitiesPublication TypePublicationAgenciesBJS

## Side navigation

-  Just the Stats 
-  Search Publications 
-  Forthcoming Publications 
-  Research and Third-party Reports 
-  Data Corrections 

**Interested in Statistics?**

Sign up for email notices of new crime and justice statistical materials as they become available from BJS.

Subscribe
### [§2371. Renumbered §4021]
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Frank Oakes, Chief Executive Officer of Stellar Biotechnologies Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: January 15, 2013   /s/  "Frank Oakes" Frank Oakes, President and Chief Executive Officer
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 1088 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 099 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
### §923. Art. 123. Offenses concerning Government computers

(a) In General.—Any person subject to this chapter who—

(1) knowingly accesses a Government computer, with an unauthorized purpose, and by doing so obtains classified information, with reason to believe such information could be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, and intentionally communicates, delivers, transmits, or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted such information to any person not entitled to receive it;

(2) intentionally accesses a Government computer, with an unauthorized purpose, and thereby obtains classified or other protected information from any Government computer; or

(3) knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization to a Government computer;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "computer" has the meaning given that term in section 1030 of title 18.

(2) The term "Government computer" means a computer owned or operated by or on behalf of the United States Government.

(3) The term "damage" has the meaning given that term in section 1030 of title 18.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5436, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2952.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 923 was renumbered section 905 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
#### § 225.25 Resolution of disputes.

A minerals agreement shall contain provisions for resolving disputes that may arise between the parties. However, no such provision shall limit the Secretary's authority or ability to ensure that the rights of an Indian mineral owner are protected in the event of a violation of the provisions of the minerals agreement by any other party to the minerals agreement.
# C_2014152EN.01002701.xml

| 20.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/27

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Modification of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 152/09)

| Member State | Sweden |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Pajala – Luleå airport |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 20 December 2001 |
| Date of entry into force of modifications | 25 October 2015 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  The Swedish Transport Administration |
| SE-781 87 Borlänge |
| SVERIGE |
| Tel. +46 771921921 |
| Internet: www.trafikverket.se |

Member State

Sweden

Route concerned

Pajala – Luleå airport

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

20 December 2001

Date of entry into force of modifications

25 October 2015

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

The Swedish Transport Administration

SE-781 87 Borlänge

SVERIGE

Tel. +46 771921921

Internet: www.trafikverket.se

---
### §8218. Aviation designations: naval flight officer

Any officer of the naval service may be designated a naval flight officer if he has successfully completed the course prescribed for naval flight officers.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 377, §6024; Pub. L. 91–198, §1(2), Feb. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 15; renumbered §8218, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6024 | 34 U.S.C. 735 (par. 3). | June 24, 1926, ch. 668, §3 (par. 3), 44 Stat. 767. |

The phrase "by competent authority" is omitted as surplusage. The definition form of 34 U.S.C. 735 is not followed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8218, added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(164)(A), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1515; amended Pub. L. 96–107, title III, §302(d), Nov. 9, 1979, 93 Stat. 806; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(a)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059; Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title X, §1061(a)(23)(B), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1473, related to authorized strength of Air Force in reserve general officers in active status, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(a)(3), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2988. See section 12004 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6024 of this title as this section.

1970—Pub. L. 91–198 substituted "naval flight officer" for "naval aviation observer" and "naval flight officers" for "naval aviation observers," and struck out requirement that such officer have been in the air at least 100 hours.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 162.112 How must records associated with this part be preserved? ( a ) Any organization, including tribes and tribal organizations, that have records identified in § 162.111(a) must preserve the records in accordance with approved Departmental records retention procedures under the Federal Records Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapters 29, 31 and 33. These records and related records management practices and safeguards required under the Federal Records Act are subject to inspection by the Secretary and the Archivist of the United States.
( b ) A tribe or tribal organization should preserve the records identified in § 162.111(b) for the period of time authorized by the Archivist of the United States for similar Department of the Interior records in accordance with 44 U.S.C. Chapter 33. If a tribe or tribal organization does not preserve records associated with its conduct of business with the Department of the Interior under this part, it may prevent the tribe or tribal organization from being able to adequately document essential transactions or furnish information necessary to protect its legal and financial rights or those of persons directly affected by its activities.
| **Accounts Receivable - Textual (Details)**                                          | Dec. 31, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2012 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Accounts Receivable (Textual) (Abstract)**                                         |          |          |
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts as a Percentage of Total Patient Accounts Receivable | 11.10%        | 11.00%        |

| X                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**hls_AccountsReceivableTextualAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**hls_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Allowance for doubtful accounts expressed as a percentage of gross patient accounts receivable.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**hls_AllowanceForDoubtfulAccountsAsPercentageOfPatientAccountsReceivable**Namespace Prefix:**hls_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
156 So.2d 647

#### Ex parte Johnny Virgil NATIONS.

3 Div. 90.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 26, 1963.

Johnny Virgil Nations, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and • Winston Huddleston, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., . for the State.

LAWSON, Justice.

Johnny Virgil Nations, who is confined in the penitentiary of this state, filed before a judge of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County a petition praying for his discharge in a habeas corpus proceeding. Nations was unsuccessful. He appealed to the Court of Appeals. He was unsuccessful in the Court of Appeals. Nations’ application for a rehearing in the Court of Appeals was overruled on June 18, 1963.

He has now filed in this court an original petition for writ of habeas corpus. The writ will be denied. Nations’ remedy was to come to this court by petition for writ of certiorari to-review-and revise the judgment and decision of the Court of Appeals.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Denied.

GOODWYN, MERRILL and HAR-WOOD, JJ., concur.
#### § 212.43 Royalty rates for minerals other than oil and gas.

The provisions of § 211.43 of this subchapter are applicable to leases under this part.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Photos

slide show module

Abraham Lincoln conducts flight operations

Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 103 Conducts a Change of Command

George Washington Participates in Bilateral Exercises with Chile

JPMRC-X | 2-27th Infantry Regiment assaults simulated opposing forces

F-22s arrive in Guam for Valiant Shield 24

JPMRC-X | Philippine Army Special Forces engage simulated opposing forces

USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) conducts night flight operations in support of Valiant Shield 2024

Tiger Strike 24: VMM165 Refuels

USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) steams in formation with 7th Fleet ships, Japan Maritime Self Defense Force ships, as U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force and Japan Air Self-Defense Force aircraft fly over in support of Valiant Shield 2024

Lt. Rachel Lee Performs Preflight Checks
# CA2006173EN.01000101.xml

| 26.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 173/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 173/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02198**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 

### 02198\02198_Checklist_102610_version34.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist



### 02198\02198_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 

### 02198\02198_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02198\02198_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02198\02198_Part H.XLS Plant submitted survey file



### 02198\02198_Certification.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02198\Supplemental Documents\WATER BALANCE AND SITE MAP\02198_001.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 3 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
October 8, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARK BRIAN MORRIS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00167-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 408 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 1, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 1838) to assist in the enhancement of the security of Taiwan, and for 
other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
amendment recommended by the Committee on International Relations now printed in 
the bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on International Relations; (2) an 
amendment printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule 
XVIII, if offered by the Minority Leader or a designee, which shall be 
considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1084

ARTHUR TRACY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-1031-7) Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Tracy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Arthur Tracy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tracy v. Virginia , No. CA-01-1031-7 (W.D. Va. filed Dec. 26, 2001; entered Dec. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Searched for **http://www.neighborworks.org/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.neighborworks.org/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
### [§2541c. Renumbered §4984]