alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Certification

 

I, Michael J. Mack, Jr., certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2012 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 

 

 

 

 
| Date:   May 20, 2015 | By:    | */s/   Michael J. Mack*                                                       |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Michael   J. Mack, Jr.                                                   |   |
|                      |   | President of John Deere Capital Corporation (as |
|                      |   | Servicer)                                                                     |   |
|                           |        |                                                                               |        |  |

 

----
### §9779. Use of public property

(a) When the economy of the Air Force or the Space Force so requires, the Secretary of the Air Force shall establish military headquarters in places where suitable buildings are owned by the United States.

(b) No money appropriated for the support of the Air Force or the Space Force may be spent for base gardens or Air Force exchanges. However, this does not prevent Air Force exchanges from using public buildings or public transportation that, in the opinion of the Secretary, are not needed for other purposes.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 591; Pub. L. 99–661, div. B, title VII, §2721, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 4042; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(e)(19), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3819.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9779(a)9779(b) | 10:1332.10:1345. | June 23, 1879, ch. 35, §8, 21 Stat. 35. |
| 9779(c) | 10:1335. | Aug. 1, 1914, ch. 223 (2d par. under "Quartermaster Corps"), 38 Stat. 629. |
| | | July 16, 1892, ch. 195 (last proviso under "Quartermaster's Department"), 27 Stat. 178; June 28, 1950, ch. 383, §402(c), 64 Stat. 272. |

9779(b)

10:1345.

In subsection (a), the words "United States" are substituted for the word "Government".

In subsection (b), the words "suitable space" are substituted for the words "proper and suitable room or rooms". The words "there is a" are substituted for the words "have been established".

In subsection (c), the words "the Secretary" are substituted for the words "the Quartermaster General", since the functions which, for the Army, are assigned by statute to subordinate officers of the Army, are, for the Air Force, assigned to the Secretary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, §923(e)(19)(A), inserted "or the Space Force" after "economy of the Air Force".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283, §923(e)(19)(B), inserted "or the Space Force" after "support of the Air Force".

1986—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 99–661 redesignated subsec. (c) as (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which directed the Secretary to assign suitable space for postal purposes at each air base where there was a post office.
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 21 - 00293 - CR JAMES DORA, JR. , A

PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 137th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No . 2019 - 417,316 , Honorable John J. “ Trey ” McClendon III , Presiding 

### April 7 , 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J. and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ. Appellant James Dora, Jr. appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery 1 and sentence to forty
- five years ’ imprisonment

. The appellate record was originally due December 20 , 202 1

. The clerk ’ s record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter ’ s record was not. We subsequently granted the reporter, Ms. Breann Hays, t hree
ex tensions to file the reporter ’ s record due to her caseload

. By letter of February 24 , 2021 , we admonished Ms. Hays that no further extensions would be granted and that failure to file the reporter ’ s record by March 21 w ould result in the appeal being abat ed

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 29.03.2

and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice

. Ms. Hays has since requested a fourth extension to April 21 , 2021, to file the reporter’s record.
W e deny the request, abate th e appeal , and remand the cause t o the trial court for further proceedings. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 35.3(c) ( “ The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. ” ); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring appellate courts to “ make whatever order is ap propriate to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties ’ rights ” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand, the trial court shall determine the following:
1. what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter ’ s record; 2. why Ms. Hays has not completed the necessary tasks; 3. what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks; and 4. whether Ms. Hays can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds reasonable. Should the tria l court determine that Ms. Hays will require more than thirty days to complete, certify, and file the reporter ’ s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforeme ntioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental clerk ’ s record and cause that record to be filed with this C ourt by May 9, 2022

. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  S ISIRC HATTOPADHYAY ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 02-1943



#  T OMMY G. T HOMPSON , S ECRETARY , U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF H EALTH AND H UMANS ERVICES ,

Defendant-Appellee. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge.

(CA-99-388-WNM) Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 6, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Gary T. Brown, GARY T. BROWN & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney,Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Sisir Chattopadhyay appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Employer and dismissing his employment discrimination action based upon national origin for failure to timely exhaust administrative remedies and denying his motion for reconsideration. Finding no error, we affirm.This court reviews de novo a district court’s order granting summary judgment and views the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Providence Square Assocs., L.L.C. v. G.D.F., Inc. , 211 F.3d 846, 850 (4th Cir. 2000). Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Summary judgment will be granted unless a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party on the evidence presented. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986). A federal employee is required to timely exhaust his administrativeremedies by initiating contact with an EEO counselor within fortyfive days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory, or of the effective date of the alleged discriminatory personnel action. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) (2001); Jakubiak v. Perry , 101 F.3d 23, 26- 27 (4th Cir. 1996) (federal employee must notify EEO counselor within 45 days of discriminatory incident). The time limit may be extended if the complainant shows that he was not notified or aware of the time limits. 29 C.F.R. § 1613.214(a)(4) (2001).Courts strictly adhere to time limits and rarely allow equitable tolling of limitations periods. See Irwin v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs , 498 U.S. 89, 95-96 (1990). After a review of the record, we conclude thatChattopadhyay had constructive notice of the EEO filing requirements. See Nealon v. Stone , 958 F.2d 584, 589-90 (4th Cir. 1992); Zografov v. V.A. Medical Ctr. , 779 F.2d 967, 968-70 (4th Cir. 1985). 2 C HATTOPADHYAY v. T HOMPSONWe therefore affirm the judgment order and order denying the motion for reconsideration. We deny Appellant’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 C HATTOPADHYAY v. T HOMPSON
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 473 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 13, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4199) to terminate the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. An amendment 
in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of H.R. 4230 shall be 
considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 
one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and 
(2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### Design and operation of the artificial-recharge plant at Bay Park, New York

By: Ellis KochA.A. GiaimoD.J. Sulam

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp751B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2006224EN.01003305.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/33

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Livorno — Italy) — Alberto Bianchi v De Robert Calzature Srl

(Case C-51/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 224/71)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 08.04.2006.

1

---
#### § 181.6 How are applicants informed of the results?

BIA will send a letter to all applicants notifying them of their selection or non-selection for participation in the Indian Highway Safety Program for the upcoming fiscal year. BIA will explain to each applicant not selected for participation the reason(s) for non-selection.
§ 169.112 How much monetary compensation must be paid for a right-of-way over or across individually owned Indian land? ( a ) A right-of-way over or across individually owned Indian land must require compensation of not less than fair market value, unless paragraph (b) or (c) of this section permit a lesser amount. Compensation may also include additional fees, including but not limited to throughput fees, severance damages, franchise fees, avoidance value, bonuses, or other factors. Compensation may be based on a fixed amount, a percentage of the projected income, or some other method. The grant must establish how the fixed amount, percentage, or combination will be calculated and the frequency at which the payments will be made.
( b ) We may approve a right-of-way over or across individually owned Indian land that provides for nominal compensation, or compensation less than a fair market value, if: ( 1 ) The grantee is a utility cooperative and is providing a direct benefit to the Indian land; or
( 2 ) The grantee is a tribal utility; or
( 3 ) The individual Indian landowners execute a written waiver of the right to receive fair market value and we determine it is in the individual Indian landowners' best interest, based on factors including, but not limited to: ( i ) The grantee is a member of the immediate family, as defined in § 169.2, of an individual Indian landowner;
( ii ) The grantee is a co-owner in the affected tract;
( iii ) A special relationship or circumstances exist that we believe warrant approval of the right-of-way; or
( iv ) We have waived the requirement for a valuation under paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) We will require a valuation to determine fair market value, unless: ( 1 ) 100 percent of the individual Indian landowners submit to us a written request to waive the valuation requirement; or
( 2 ) We waive the requirement under paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) The grant must provide that the non-consenting individual Indian landowners, and those on whose behalf we have consented under § 169.108(c), or granted the right-of-way without consent under § 169.107(b), receive fair market value, as determined by a valuation, unless: ( 1 ) The grantee is a utility cooperative and is providing a direct benefit to the Indian land; or
( 2 ) The grantee is a tribal utility; or
( 3 ) We waive the requirement because the tribe or grantee will construct infrastructure improvements benefitting the individual Indian landowners, and we determine in writing that the waiver is in the best interest of all the landowners.
### §505.1 Electromagnetic Spectrum Enterprise Operational Lead for Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations

(a) In General.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall establish an Electromagnetic Spectrum Enterprise Operational Lead for Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (in this section referred to as the "operational lead") at the United States Strategic Command. The operational lead shall report to the Commander of the United States Strategic Command.

(b) Function.—The operational lead shall be responsible for synchronizing, assessing, and making recommendations to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff with respect to the readiness of the combatant commands to conduct joint electromagnetic spectrum operations.

(c) Briefings Required.—Concurrent with the submission of the budget of the President to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, the Chairman, acting through the operational lead, shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the following:

(1) Progress made in achieving full operational capability to conduct joint electromagnetic spectrum operations and any impediments to achieving such capability.

(2) The readiness of the combatant commands to conduct such operations.

(3) Recommendations for overcoming any deficiencies in the readiness of the combatant commands to conduct such operations and any material gaps contributing to such deficiencies.

(4) Such other matters as the Chairman considers important to ensuring that the combatant commands are capable of conducting such operations.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVI, §1682(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 616.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 118–31, which was approved Dec. 22, 2023.

1 Another section 505 is set out in chapter 31 of this title.
§ 39.411 How will the auditor report its findings? ( a ) The auditor selected under § 39.410 must: ( 1 ) Provide an initial draft report of its findings to the governing board or responsible Federal official for the school(s) involved; and
( 2 ) Solicit, consider, and incorporate a response to the findings, where submitted, in the final audit report.
( b ) The auditor must submit a final report to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs and all tribes served by each school involved. The report must include all documented exceptions to the requirements of this part, including those exceptions that: ( 1 ) The auditor regards as negligible;
( 2 ) The auditor regards as significant, or as evidence of incompetence on the part of responsible officials, and that must be resolved in a manner similar to significant audit exceptions in a fiscal audit; or
( 3 ) Involve fraud and abuse.
( c ) The auditor must immediately report exceptions involving fraud and abuse directly to the Department of the Interior Inspector General's office.
#### § 40.4 Security.

If a borrower or cosigner has security to offer for an educational loan it must be given in an amount adequate to protect the loan.
EX-35.4
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
383 Madison Avenue
31st Floor
New York, New York 10179


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
Securities Trust 2012-C6 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2012-Certificates, Series 2012-C6

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2012 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 7, 2014


/s/Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         189,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      758
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,089
<PP&E>                                           5,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                     944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,183
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,537
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (62,104)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (62,104)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (62,104)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>