9752 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Notices 

(October 6, 2006). While we 

preliminarily determine that imports 

from the PRC of Inquiry Merchandise 

are subject to the order on certain cutto-length carbon steel plate from the 

PRC, interested parties are not 

precluded by this determination from 

applying for a ruling as to whether a 

particular product is within the scope of 

the order. See 19 CFR 351.225(c). 

Conclusion 

As noted above, we preliminarily 

determine that imports from the PRC of 

Inquiry Merchandise are subject to the 

order on certain cut-to-length carbon 

steel plate from the PRC. Also as noted 

above, we preliminarily determine that 

imports of such products are subject to 

the order regardless of the producer. 

Suspension of Liquidation 

In accordance with section 

351.225(l)(2) of the Department’s 

regulations, we are directing U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

suspend liquidation of Inquiry 

Merchandise (regardless of producer) 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after April 23, 

2010, the date of the initiation of this 

inquiry. We will also instruct CBP to 

require a cash deposit of estimated 

duties at the applicable rates for each 

unliquidated entry of the product 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after April 23, 

2010, the date of the initiation of this 

inquiry, in accordance with section 

351.225(l)(2) of the Department’s 

regulations. 

Public Comment 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on the preliminary results and 

may submit case briefs and/or written 

comments within 20 days of the 

publication of this notice. See 19 CFR 

351.225(f)(3). Interested parties may file 

rebuttal briefs and rebuttals to written 

comments, limited to issues raised in 

such briefs or comments, no later than 

10 days after the date on which the case 

briefs are due. Id. Interested parties may 

request a hearing within 20 days of the 

publication of this notice. Interested 

parties will be notified by the 

Department of the location and time of 

any hearing, if one is requested. 

This preliminary determination of 

circumvention is in accordance with 

section 781(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.225. 

Dated: February 14, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3889 Filed 2–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Stanford University, et al.; Notice of 

Consolidated Decision on Applications 

for Duty-Free Entry of Electron 

Microscopes 

This is a decision consolidated 

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 

Related records can be viewed between 

8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 3705, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue., NW., 

Washington, DC. 

Docket Number: 10–070. Applicant: 

Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, the 

Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 

76 FR 2647, January 14, 2011. 

Docket Number: 10–071. Applicant: 

Stanford University, Stanford, CA 

94305. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, the 

Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 

76 FR 2647, January 14, 2011. 

Docket Number: 10–074. Applicant: 

Wake Forest University Health Sciences, 

Winston-Salem, NC 27157. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 76 

FR 2647, January 14, 2011. 

Docket Number: 10–075. Applicant: 

The Virginia Tech Carilion Research 

Institute, Roanoke, VA 24016. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 76 

FR 2647, January 14, 2011. 

Comments: None received. Decision: 

Approved. No instrument of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instrument, for such purposes as these 

instruments are intended to be used, 

was being manufactured in the United 

States at the time the instruments were 

ordered. Reasons: Each foreign 

instrument is an electron microscope 

and is intended for research or scientific 

educational uses requiring an electron 

microscope. We know of no electron 

microscope, or any other instrument 

suited to these purposes, which was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of order of each instrument. 

Dated: February 15, 2011. 

Gregory W. Campbell, 

Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, 

Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3915 Filed 2–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–909] 

Certain Steel Nails From the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Time 

Limit for the Preliminary Results of the 

New Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 22, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ricardo Martinez, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4532. 

Background 

The antidumping duty order on 

certain steel nails from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) was 

published in the Federal Register on 

August 1, 2008. See Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Steel 

Nails From the People’s Republic of 

China, 73 FR 44961 (August 1, 2008). 

On August 27, 2010, we received a 

timely request for a new shipper review 

from Shanghai Colour Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Shanghai Colour’’) in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.214(c) and 351.214(d)(2). 

On October 4, 2010, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of the 

new shipper review of certain steel nails 

from the PRC covering the period of 

August 1, 2009, through July 31, 2010. 

See Certain Steel Nails from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 

75 FR 61132 (October 4, 2010). The 

preliminary results are currently due no 

later than March 27, 2011. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), 

provides that the Department will issue 

the preliminary results of a new shipper 

review of an antidumping duty order 

within 180 days after the day on which 

the review was initiated. See also 19 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Notices 9753 

1See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in 

Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 

75 FR 49893 (August 16, 2010) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’). 

2 DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, 

Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics (America), Inc. 

(collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’). 

3See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip From the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

69629 (November 15, 2010). 

4See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 49894. 

5 Id. 

6 In the Preliminary Results, the Department 

stated that it had ‘‘valued electricity using rates for 

large industries at 33 Kilo Volts, as published by the 

Central Electricity Authority of the Government of 

India in ‘Electricity Tariff & Duty and Average Rates 

of Electricity Supply in India,’ dated March 2008.’’ 

See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 49898. This 

statement in the Federal Register notice was an 

error, as the Department had actually averaged all 

tax-exclusive rates for electricity for small, medium, 

and large industries as published in the abovementioned report. See Memorandum to the File 

through Robert Bolling, Program Manager, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 4, from Thomas Martin, 

International Trade Compliance Analyst, 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

Continued 

CFR 351.214 (i)(1). The Act further 

provides that the Department may 

extend that 180-day period to 300 days 

if it determines that the case is 

extraordinarily complicated. See also 19 

CFR 351.214 (i)(2). 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

The Department determines that this 

new shipper review involves 

extraordinarily complicated 

methodological issues, including 

Shanghai Colour’s multiple production 

stages for subject merchandise and the 

need to evaluate the bona fide nature of 

Shanghai Colour’s sales. The 

Department finds that these 

extraordinarily complicated issues 

require additional time to evaluate. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(i)(2), the Department is 

extending the time limit for the 

preliminary results by 120 days, until 

no later than July 25, 2011. The final 

results continue to be due 90 days after 

the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: February 10, 2011. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3541 Filed 2–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–924] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of the 

First Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 16, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the 

Preliminary Results of the first 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 

and strip (‘‘PET film’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

Based upon our analysis of the 

comments and information received, we 

made changes to the margin calculation 

for the final results. We find that the 

participating respondents in this review, 

the two mandatory respondents Fuwei 

Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd. (‘‘Fuwei 

Films’’), Shaoxing Xiangyu Green 

Packing Co., Ltd. (‘‘Green Packing’’), and 

Tianjin Wanhua Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wanhua’’) 

(collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’), sold 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review 

(‘‘POR’’), November 6, 2008, through 

October 31, 2009. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 22, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Martin, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3936. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

As noted above, on August 16, 2010, 

the Department published the 

Preliminary Results of this 

administrative review. Between 

September 28, 2010 and October 5, 

2010, we received case and rebuttal 

briefs from Petitioners 2 and 

Respondents. On September 28, 2010, 

we also received written arguments 

from Bemis Company, Inc., an industrial 

user of PET film. On October 18, 2010, 

the Department placed a revised wage 

rate calculation on the record for 

comment. Between October 26, 2010 

and November 1, 2010, we received 

comments and rebuttal comments from 

Petitioners and Respondents regarding 

the revised wage rate calculation. On 

November 15, 2010, the Department 

published a notice extending the time 

period for issuing the final results by 60 

days to February 14, 2011.3 On 

November 22, 2010, the Department 

held a public hearing of the arguments 

presented in the interested parties’ 

submissions. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case briefs by 

parties are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results in the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

which is dated concurrently with this 

notice (‘‘I&D Memo’’). A list of the issues 

which parties raised, and to which we 

respond in the I&D Memo, is attached to 

this notice as an Appendix. The I&D 

Memo is a public document and is on 

file in the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), 

Main Commerce Building, Room 7046, 

and is accessible on the Department’s 

Web site at 

http://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper 

copy and electronic version of the 

memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Partial Rescission of 

Administrative Review 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department preliminarily rescinded the 

administrative review with respect to 

Sichuan Dongfang Insulating Material 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Dongfang’’). Dongfang 

reported that it had no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR.4 As we stated in 

the Preliminary Results, our 

examination of shipment data from U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

for Dongfang confirmed that there were 

no entries of subject merchandise from 

Dongfang during the POR. 5 We also 

received no comments or information to 

change our preliminary rescission. 

Therefore, we are rescinding this 

administrative review with respect to 

Dongfang. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record, as 

well as comments received from parties 

regarding our Preliminary Results, we 

have made revisions to Respondents’ 

margin calculations for the final 

results.6 Pursuant to a recent decision 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES