alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Corey E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


November 12, 2002                          /s/  Corey E. Shaker
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Corey E. Shaker
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       35
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 354TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 9th 

day of November, A.D. 2017, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

John Michael Shaver, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-17-00086-CR

Trial Court No. 30,852

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, John Michael Shaver, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 4th day of January, A.D. 2018.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Policy 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# News & Policy

Stay informed with our latest news and important announcements including: press releases, media appearances, testimonies, policy and congressional updates.

## PBGC Approves SFA Application for UFCW Local 152 Plan

### Press Release

----

----

#### *UFCW Local 152 Plan Averts Insolvency and Reduction of Benefits Through Receipt of Special Financial Assistance*

April 12, 2024

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) announced today that it has approved the application submitted to the Special Financial Assistance (SFA) Program by the United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 152 Retail Meat Pension Plan (UFCW Local 152 Plan). The plan, based in Mount Laurel, New...

## PBGC Approves SFA Application for Local 73 Plan

### Press Release

----

----

#### *Local 73 Plan Averts Insolvency and Reduction of Benefits Through Receipt of Special Financial Assistance*

April 12, 2024

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) announced today that it has approved the application submitted to the Special Financial Assistance (SFA) Program by the Teamsters Union Local No. 73 Pension Plan (Local 73 Plan). The plan, based in Valley View, Ohio, covers 529 participants in the transportation...

## PBGC Statement on Central States’ Repayment of $126.5 Million in Special Financial Assistance

### Statement

----

----

April 8, 2024

PBGC is committed to effective stewardship of taxpayer funds. On April 8, 2024, the Central States Pension Plan (Central States) returned to the U.S. Government more than $126.5 million—the portion of the SFA amount paid to the plan based on inaccurate participant census data. PBGC has been coordinating for several...

All News

## Congressional Testimony

Read or view statements by PBGC leadership before committees of the United States Congress.

## Legislative Affairs

Legislative Affairs manages the relationship between PBGC and Congress, responds to inquiries, and assists with constituent concerns.

## PBGC Reports

Read our research reports to learn more about specific aspects of PBGC's operations, our guarantees, and the plans we insure.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward L. Pierce, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of BindView Development Corporation (the "Company"), certify that (i)
the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and the results of operations of the Company.

By  /s/ EDWARD L. PIERCE
    --------------------------------------
    Edward L. Pierce
    Director, Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer
    August 13, 2004

      A signed original of the foregoing certification has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX‐35.4
| (logo) Prudential | Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. **Prudential Mortgage Capital Company**2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 Dallas, TX 75201 Tel 877-937-4500 |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationCommercial Mortgage Servicing, MAC D1086-120550 South Tryon Street, 14th FloorCharlotte, North Carolina 280202Attention: WFRBS 2012-C6 Asset Manager  Re: WFRBS 2012-C6Period: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”)  **Annual Compliance Statement** I, Timothy E. Steward, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify with regard to the Company’s role as Sub‐Servicer under the Sub‐Servicing Agreement, (the “Agreement”) dated as of February 1, 2012 pertaining to the above‐referenced certificates, that: (i)  a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the period noted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement during the reporting period has been made under my supervision, and (ii)  to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reporting period.  Effective as of March 1, 2016 /s/ Timothy E. StewardTimothy E. StewardPresident and Managing Director Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
# C_2006165EN.01001302.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/13

---

Appeal brought on 13 April 2006 by TEA-CEGOS, SA and Services techniques globaux (STG) SA against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) delivered on 14 February 2006 in Joined Cases T-376/05 and T-383/05 TEA-CEGOS, SA, STG SA and GHK Consulting Ltd v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-189/06 P)

(2006/C 165/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: TEA-CEGOS, SA, Services techniques globaux (STG) SA (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: GHK Consulting Ltd, Commission of the European Communities

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of 14 February 2006 of the Court of First Instance in Joined Cases T-376/05 and T-383/05; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of 14 February 2006 of the Court of First Instance in Joined Cases T-376/05 and T-383/05;

| — | consequently, grant the appellants the relief they claimed at first instance and, therefore, |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, grant the appellants the relief they claimed at first instance and, therefore,

| — | annul the decision of 12 October 2005 rejecting the candidature and bid of the TEA-CEGOS consortium and withdrawing the decision awarding the framework contract to the TEA-CEGOS consortium under the call for tenders EuropeAid — 2/119860/C-LOT No 7; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 12 October 2005 rejecting the candidature and bid of the TEA-CEGOS consortium and withdrawing the decision awarding the framework contract to the TEA-CEGOS consortium under the call for tenders EuropeAid — 2/119860/C-LOT No 7;

| — | annul all the other decisions taken by the defendant under that call for tenders following the decision of 12 October 2005 and, in particular, the award decisions and the contracts concluded by the Commission implementing those decisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul all the other decisions taken by the defendant under that call for tenders following the decision of 12 October 2005 and, in particular, the award decisions and the contracts concluded by the Commission implementing those decisions;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs at first instance and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellants base their appeal on breach of Community law by, and on procedural irregularities before, the Court of First Instance. The appellants submit that the Court of First Instance disregarded the principle of legal certainty, its obligation to state reasons and the principle of sound administration and distorted the evidence.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Enterprises Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Roy Piceni
---------------------------------
Roy Piceni
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 22, 2004

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 ("Section  906"), or other document  authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been  provided  to  Satellite  Enterprises,  Corp.  and will be  retained by
Satellite  Enterprises,  Corp.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-33.5
(logo) PACIFIC LIFE

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SEC
REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

Pacific Life Insurance Company (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC's Regulation AB,
specifically criteria 1122(d)(3)(i)(a-c) and (d)(4)(vii),,which management has
determined to be applicable to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform. The transactions covered by this report include all
asset-backed transactions under the Securitized Commercial Mortgage Loans
Operating Advisor Platform (the "Platform"), as listed in Appendix A.

The Asserting Party has assessed the effectiveness of Pacific Life Insurance
Company's compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2013 and has concluded that it has complied, in all
material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2013, with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report for the Platform on the assessment of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2013, as set forth in this assertion.

Pacific Life Insurance Company

sm /s/ M.A. Stickles  3/24/14
M.A. Stickles
Vice President

/s/ L. Lisa Fields  3/24/14
L. Lisa Fields
Assistant Secretary


PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
700 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660-6307, Telephone (949)
219-3011


(page)


APPENDIX A

SECURITIZED COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOANS
OPERATING ADVISOR PLATFORM

Trust Name
Morgan Stanley Capital I Series 2012-C4
#### § 213.30 Permission to start operations.

No operations will be permitted on any lease before it is approved. Written permission must be secured from the supervisor before any operations are started under any oil and gas lease. Operations must be in accordance with the operating regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior. Copies of these regulations may be secured from either the supervisor or the Area Director and no operations should be attempted without a study of the operating regulations.
#### § 158.57 Approval of deeds or other instruments vesting title on partition and payment of costs.

Upon completion of the partition proceedings in accordance with the law and in conformity with the regulations in this part, the Secretary, or his authorized representative, may approve the deeds, or other instruments vesting title on partition, and may disburse from the restricted (accounts) funds of the Indians concerned, such amounts as may be necessary for payment of their share of court costs, attorney fees, and owelty moneys.
Order issued November , 2012 

In The 

(Court of Appeals 

NMI! Bistrirt of aexas at Dallas . No. 05-11-01672-CV 

AMERICAN NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, L.P., ET AL., Appellants 

V. 

THE COLONY ASSETS DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., Appellee 

ORDER 

We GRANT the October 26, 2012 motion of Ronald E. Harden with the Law Offices of 

Ronald E. Harden, P.L.L.C. to withdraw as counsel for appellants, American National Development, 

L.P., Dibold American Development, LLC, and Bill Baldwin. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court 

to remove Ronald E. Harden with the Law Offices of Ronald E. Harden, P.L.L.C. as counsel for 

appellants. 

We ORDER appellants to notify the Court, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, 

of the name, State Bar number, address, and telephone number of new counsel. We specifically 

notify appellants, American National Development, L.P. and Dibold American Development, LLC, 

that because they are corporations, they may only appear in this Court through an attorney. See 

Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., 937 S.W.2d 455,456 (Tex. 1996) (per curiam). 

Accordingly, if we do not receive the information regarding new counsel within the time specified, 
we will dismiss the appeal as to appellants, American National Development, L.P. and Dibold 

American Development, LLC. If the Court does not receive a response from appellant Bill Baldwin 

regarding new counsel within the time specified, the Court will assume Mr. Baldwin is proceeding 

pro se. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by first class mail to 

appellants at the following address: 

Mr. Bill Baldwin 

4024 Treemont Circle 

Colleyville, Texas 76034
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Premium Filings 
-  Business Codes 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Business Codes

One of the data items required to be reported in a premium filing is the business code that best describes the nature of the plan sponsor's business (or main business activity of the employers and/or employee organizations if more than one employer or employee organization is involved). The applicable Business Codes for each year beginning with 2014 can be found here.

November 1, 2017

##           Online Premium Filing (My PAA)          

My PAA is PBGC’s secure online application for electronic submission of premium filings and payments.

Log In to My PAA

Create a New Account

How to Use My PAA
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________________

Nos. 97-40327 & 97-40617

Summary Calendar

____________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT JAY TASHBOOK,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:96-CR-32-1)

_________________________________________________________________

March 20, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Tashbook, who pleaded guilty to one count of

traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in sexual

acts with a minor and also to possessing three or more visual depictions

transported by computer in interstate commerce of minors engaging in

sexually explicit conduct, appeals one issue in his sentencing. He

contends that U.S.S.G. § 2G2.4, as effective in 1995, did not explain

how its enhancement for “possessing ten or more . . . items, containing
2

a visual depiction involving the sexual exploitation of a minor” applies

to depictions stored on a computer. Finding no error in the trial

court’s sentencing decision, we affirm.

Tashbook contends that the 20-30 graphic images that were

contained on his computer and depicted minors engaged in sexually

explicit activities were stored in one directory and were therefore like

images contained in one magazine, which would be counted as one item for

purposes of this sentencing enhancement. This legal argument is

foreclosed by Tashbook’s guilty plea. First, Tashbook pled guilty to

the crime of possessing “three or more visual depictions transported by

computer” (emphasis added), a plea utterly inconsistent with the

contention that for sentencing purposes, he possessed only one offending

item. Second, his guilty plea agreement specifically states that he

“possessed ten (10) or more items containing a visual depiction

involving the sexual exploitation of a minor as referenced in the

specific offense characteristics of U.S.S.G. § 2G2.4.” (emphasis added).

Having stipulated to the precise facts that undergird

application of this sentencing enhancement, Tashbook cannot now turn

around on appeal and assert that possessing more than three items, and

ten or more items of computer-transmitted visual depictions of sexual

exploitation of a minor are in fact only one such depiction for criminal

purposes. Even if Tashbook had not foreclosed this argument by his own

agreement, however, we would be skeptical of the contention that

transmission of these images over the Internet could result in a finding

that only one offending item existed based solely on the way in which

defendant chose to store the images in his computer.
3

The sentence imposed by the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

*Time and Date:*                     8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., Friday, March 11, 2011.                

*Location:*                     Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                

*Status:*                     Open to the public, on a first come, first served basis, limited by the space available. An opportunity for the public to listen to the meeting by phone may be provided;                     *see*                     “contact for additional information” below.                

*Purpose:*                     This is the final scheduled meeting of the National Conversation on Public Health and Chemical Exposures Leadership Council. The National Conversation on Public Health and Chemical Exposures is a collaborative initiative through which many organizations and individuals are helping develop an action agenda for strengthening the nation's approach to protecting the public's health from harmful chemical exposures. The Leadership Council provides overall guidance to the National Conversation project and will be responsible for issuing the final action agenda. For additional information on the National Conversation on Public Health and Chemical Exposures, visit this Web site:                     *http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/​nationalconversation/​.*

*Meeting agenda:*                     The Leadership Council will finalize the Action Agenda.                

*Contact for additional information:*                     If you would like to receive additional information on attending the meeting or the potential opportunity to listen to the meeting by phone, please contact:                    *nationalconversation@cdc.gov*                     or Julie Fishman at 770-488-0629.                

Dated: February 9, 2011.

Tanja Popovic,

Deputy Associate Director for Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2011-3654 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P