alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014097EN.01001001.xml

| 2.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 97/05

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 27.2.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 27.2.2014 - 31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | USK/567EI. |
| Species | Tusk (Brosme brosme) |
| Zone | Union and international waters of V, VI and VII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 01/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

27.2.2014

Duration

27.2.2014 - 31.12.2014

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

USK/567EI.

Species

Tusk (Brosme brosme)

Brosme brosme

Zone

Union and international waters of V, VI and VII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

01/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1735EM

_____________ Lonnie D. Snelling, *
* Appellant, *

*
v. *
* State of Missouri, Indispensible Party; * Kathianne Knaup Crane, Judge; * Lawrence Crahan, Judge; Gerald M. * Smith, Judge; Mary Rhodes Russell, * Judge; King Dodge, Inc.; Lou Fusz * Dodge Co.; Mary Elizabeth Dorsey, * Attorney; Thomas J. Kelly, Staff * Attorney; Stephen P. McGlynn, * Appeal from the United States Attorney; McGlynn and McGlynn; * District Court for the Eastern Deeba, Sauter & Herd; James R. * District of Missouri. Reinhard, Judge, officially and * individually; Thad F. Niemira, Judge, * [UNPUBLISHED] officially and individually; Brendan * Ryan, Judge; St. Louis City Board of * Education, its members in their official * capacity; Curtis, Oetting, Heinz, * Garrett & Soule, P.C.; Elizabeth W. * Lane; Lewis Rice & Fingersh P.C.; * John R. Esnner; J. Patrick Chassaing; * Carl Lumley; Queen Ester Stephenson; * Green, Schaaf & Margo, P.C.; Joseph * D. Jacobson; Housing Authority, of St. * Louis County; John F. Kintz, Judge; * Robert S. Cohen, Judge; Larry L. * Kendrick, Judge; Margaret M. Nolan, *-2-

Retired; Robert Lee Campbell, Judge; * Phillip J. Sweeney, Judge; Carl R. * Gaertner, Judge; James A. Pudlowski, * Judge; Ronnie L. White, Judge; Paul J. * Simon, Judge; Mary K. Hoff, Judge; * Gary Gaertner, Judge; Stanley A. * Grimm, Judge; James R. Dowd, Judge; * Charles P. Poplstein; Diane M. Hoelzl, * Attorney; Thompson Coburn; Chrysler * Motors Corporation; Nelson G. Wolff, * Attorney; Lashly & Baer; Masonic * Home, of Missouri; Kathy Chestnut, * Attorney; Adrian P. Sulser, Attorney; * Evans & Dixon; Active Business * Liquidations; Maureen Jaggard, Clerk; * John P. Mahoney, Vice-President; * Eddie G. Davis, Secretary; David * Mahan, Superintendent; Earl E. Nance, * Jr., President, *
* Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: December 18, 1997 Filed: December 19, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.

Lonn ieD. Snelling appeals the district court's orders denying Snelling's recusal motion and dismissing his second amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civi l Procedure 41 (b). The dismissal was based on Snelling's failure to comply with the district court's earlier order directing him to file an amended pleading in compliance-3-

with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) or risk dismissal. Having c arefullyreviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court did not abuse it s discre tion. See Pope v. Federal Express Corp. , 974 F.2d 982, 985 (8th Cir. 1992 ) (concerning recusal motions); Mangan v. Weinberger , 848 F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir. 1988) (concerning Rule 41(b) dismissals for failure to comply with Rule 8), cert. denied , 488 U.S. 1023 (1 989). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R

. 47B.

W edeny as moot the motion of certain appellees to dismiss this appeal, and we deny all other pending motions.
A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### B. H. Snodgrass v. The State.

No. 22906.

Delivered June 14, 1944.

*409The opinion states the case.

*Aubrey Davee,*of Brady, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for “procuring” under Art. 525 P. C. (1925), and punishment assessed at a fine of $100.00 and 60 days in jail.

The statute referred to in so far as applicable here reads as follows “Whoever shall invite, solicit, procure, allure or use any means in alluring or procuring any female to visit and be at any particular house, room or place for the purpose of meeting and having unlawful sexual intercourse with any male person, or to take part or in any way participate in any immoral conduct with men or women, * * * shall be fined not less than fifty nor more than two hundred dollars and be confined in jail not less than one nor more than six months.”

The information, omitting formal parts, alleges that appellant: “* * * did then and there unlawfully, participate in the immoral conduct between C. W. Parker and Hable Watkins by taking the said C. W. Parker to the said Hable Watkins and transporting both the said C. W. Parker and the said Hable Watkins to Richard Park for the purpose of engaging in Immoral conduct and did then and there bring about and procure unlawful *sexial*intercourse between the said C. W. Parker and said Hable Watkins. * * *”

*410Appellant moved to quash the information on the ground that it charged no offense. 'He calls attention to the misspelling of the word “sexual.” Under Art. 412 C. C. P. and authorities cited in Note 3, Vernon’s Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 1, the error in spelling was not fatal. See also Graham v. State, 119 Tex. Cr. R¡ 14, 46 S. W. (2d) 709; Jones v. State, 124 Tex. Cr. R. 355, 61 S. W. (2d) 1003.

The serious question regarding the information and complaint is that nowhere therein appears an averment that one of the .parties involved in the immoral conduct was a “female” and the other a “male.” If resort to the evidence could be had to supplement the State’s pleading the defect could be remedied, but this cannot be done. The complaint and information must stand or fall upon their own averments. Authorities cited under Wilson’s Tex. Cr. Forms, No. 257, and the form there suggested as well as under Art. 519 P. C. for “pandering” will be sufficient guide for the pleading if further prosecution is pursued.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
# C_2006224EN.01003103.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 20 June 2006 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union

(Case C-133/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 224/60)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

1

---
§ 152.26 Advertisement. ( a ) Upon approval of an application for an advertised sale, notice of the sale will be published not less than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the sale unless for good cause a shorter period is authorized by the Secretary.
( b ) The notice of sale will include: ( 1 ) Terms, conditions, place, date, hour, and methods of sale, including explanation of auction procedure as set out in § 152.27(b)(2) if applicable;
( 2 ) Where and how bids shall be submitted;
( 3 ) A statement warning all bidders against violation of 18 U.S.C. 1860 prohibiting unlawful combination or intimidation of bidders or potential bidders; and
( 4 ) Description of tracts, all reservations to which title will be subject and any restrictions and encumbrances of record with the Bureau of Indian Affairs and any other information that may improve sale prospects.
### §649c. Eligibility for consideration for promotion

(a) In General.—Except as provided by this section, eligibility for promotion of officers in any competitive category of officers designated for purposes of this subchapter shall be governed by the provisions of section 619 of this title.

(b) Inapplicability of Certain Time-in-grade Requirements.—Paragraphs (2) through (4) 1 of section 619(a) of this title shall not apply to the promotion of officers described in subsection (a).

(c) Inapplicability to Officers Above and Below Promotion Zone.—The following provisions of section 619(c) of this title shall not apply to the promotion of officers described in subsection (a):

(1) The reference in paragraph (1) of that section to an officer above the promotion zone.

(2) Paragraph (2)(A) of that section.

(d) Inapplicability of Requirement Relating to Opportunities for Consideration for Promotion.—Section 645(1)(A)(i)(I) of this title shall not apply to the promotion of officers described in subsection (a) to the extent that such section is inconsistent with a number of opportunities for promotion specified pursuant to section 649d of this title.

(e) Ineligibility of Certain Officers.—The following officers are not eligible for promotion under this subchapter:

(1) An officer described in section 619(d) of this title.

(2) An officer not included within the promotion zone.

(3) An officer who has failed of promotion to a higher grade the maximum number of times specified for opportunities for promotion for such grade within the competitive category concerned pursuant to section 649d of this title.

(4) An officer recommended by a selection board to be removed from consideration for promotion in accordance with section 649b(c) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title V, §507(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1745; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title V, §506, Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3573.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Paragraph (4) of section 619(a) of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), was redesignated paragraph (5) of section 619(a) of this title by Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, §502(2), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1680.

#### Amendments

2021—Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 116–283 added subsec. (d) and redesignated former subsec. (d) as (e).

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 248.10 Appeals from administrative actions.

Any decision made by the Regional Director under this part shall be subject to appeal to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, and any decision of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs on such an appeal may be appealed to the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with part 2 of this chapter.

[32 FR 3945, Mar. 10, 1967, as amended at 85 FR 73193, Nov. 17, 2020]
# C_2006188EN.01000101.xml

| 11.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 August 2006

(2006/C 188/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2857 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4606 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67520 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1890 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5768 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,69 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9500 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5760 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,055 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,36 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8737 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5149 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,417 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8650 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6706 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4391 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9979 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0269 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0177 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 231,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,6930 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2483 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2845 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 633,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,709 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,892 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,147 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2857

JPY

Japanese yen

147,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4606

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67520

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1890

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5768

ISK

Iceland króna

90,69

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9500

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5760

CZK

Czech koruna

28,055

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,36

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8737

RON

Romanian leu

3,5149

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,417

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8650

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6706

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4391

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9979

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0269

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0177

KRW

South Korean won

1 231,51

ZAR

South African rand

8,6930

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2483

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2845

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 633,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,709

PHP

Philippine peso

65,892

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3300

THB

Thai baht

48,147

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### §8300. Posthumous awards

If a person who distinguishes himself dies before an award to which he is entitled is made, the award may be made and the medal, cross, or bar, or associated emblem or insignia may be presented, within five years from the date of the act or service justifying the award, to his representative as designated by the President.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 390, §6250; renumbered §8300, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(13), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6250 | 34 U.S.C. 363. | Feb. 4, 1919, ch. 14, §8 (less 1st and 2d provisos), 40 Stat. 1057; renumbered §10 and amended Aug. 7, 1942, ch. 551, §1, 56 Stat. 745. |
| | 34 U.S.C. 364a (3d sentence, less last 31 words). | July 2, 1926, ch. 721, §12 (3d sentence, less last 31 words), 44 Stat. 789; July 30, 1937, ch. 545, §4, 50 Stat. 549. |

The word "associated" is substituted for the word "other" to relate the medal or cross to its emblem or insignia.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8300, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 513; Aug. 21, 1957, Pub. L. 85–155, title III, §301(11), 71 Stat. 388; July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–616, §6(2), 74 Stat. 391; Nov. 8, 1967, Pub. L. 90–130, §1(27)(B), 81 Stat. 382, provided for selection board procedure when promotion-list officers in regular grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major are to be considered for promotion under section 8299 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §204, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2880, effective Sept. 15, 1981. See section 611 et seq. of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6250 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 212.27 Duration of leases.

The provisions of § 211.27 of this subchapter are applicable to leases under this part.
##### 



MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 14, 2007
    BY:
    /s/ Paul ZogasPaul ZogasPresident, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2006182EN.01000501.xml

| 4.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 August 2006

(2006/C 182/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2781 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4611 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67805 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2035 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5746 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,25 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8705 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,435 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9232 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5338 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,960 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9145 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6772 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4380 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9355 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0559 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0177 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 234,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,8138 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1951 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2650 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 640,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,706 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,020 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2380 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,401 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2781

JPY

Japanese yen

146,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4611

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67805

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2035

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5746

ISK

Iceland króna

90,25

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8705

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,435

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9232

RON

Romanian leu

3,5338

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,960

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9145

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6772

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4380

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9355

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0559

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0177

KRW

South Korean won

1 234,33

ZAR

South African rand

8,8138

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1951

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2650

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 640,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,706

PHP

Philippine peso

66,020

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2380

THB

Thai baht

48,401

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### STATE v. FOLAND

No. 62PA90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 309

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 5 April 1990. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 April 1990.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table For 2021 Valuation Dates 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table for 2021 Valuation Dates

This mortality table is used to determine the present value of annuities in involuntary terminations and distress terminations of single-employer plans, as discussed in 29 CFR 4044. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

 

November 12, 2020

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
#### § 500.101 Purpose.

This part effectuates section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Roundys, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Darren W. Karst, Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ DARREN W. KARST                                   
|Darren W. Karst Chief
Financial Officer March 28, 2012

A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.