alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 307.1 Penalties.

The use of Government trade-marks in an unauthorized manner, or the colorable imitation of such marks, is subject to the criminal penalties imposed by section 5 of the said act (49 Stat. 892; 25 U.S.C. 305d), which provides:

Any person who shall counterfeit or colorably imitate any Government trade-mark used or devised by the Board as provided in section 305a of this chapter, or shall, except as authorized by the Board, affix any such Government trade-mark, or shall knowingly, willfully, and corruptly affix any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation thereof upon any products, Indian or otherwise, or to any labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, or receptacles intended to be used upon or in connection with the sale of such products, or any person who shall knowingly make any false statement for the purpose of obtaining the use of any such Government trade-mark shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be enjoined from further carrying on the act or acts complained of and shall be subject to a fine not exceeding $20,000, or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both such fine and imprisonment.
BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON D.C. 

Petition of: 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

OPERATING CERTIFICATE DALA026A 

For Extension of Exemption 11046 

continued relief of certain requirements of 

14 CFR 119.49(a)(4)(ii) 

Exemption 11046 

Docket FAA-2014-0158 

PETITION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

Ladies/Gentlemen: 

To Extend Exemption 11046 

January 20, 2016 

Pursuant to the provisions of 14 CFR Part 11, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL), petitions the 

Administrator to extend the effective date of Exemption No. 11046. 

The exemption grants Delta Air Lines relief from§ 119.49(a)(4)(ii) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Delta Air Lines to apply 

domestic and flag rules while conducting non-scheduled supplemental operations to airports 

not listed in its operations specifications (OpSpecs), provided certain conditions and 

limitations are met. The current exemption's expiration date is September 30, 2016. 

The conditions and circumstances which warranted the original grant of exemption, in 

regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, continue to exist. This petition 

does not seek to change the conditions and limitations of the current exemption. 

The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. For this reason, and the 

reasons stated above, Delta requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving 

publication in the Federal Register, (14 CFR §11.87). Granting the requested relief will 

set no precedents. The existence of the exemption is well known and widely accepted. 

Please contact Chuck Schramek, Director- Flight Operations QA, Compliance & Business 

Support at 404-715-1112 (office) if you have questions or require additional information. 

Sincerely, 

Step en M. Dickson 

Senior Vice President Flight Operations 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

cc: Michael Drew, Office Manager, Delta Certificate Office- FAA 

John Brooke, Acting Principal Operations Inspector, Delta CMU - FAA
### §8244. Enlisted members assigned to mess: basic allowance for subsistence paid to mess

Under such regulations as the Secretary of the Navy prescribes, the basic allowance for subsistence of enlisted members of the naval service assigned to duty with and subsisting in an officers' or other mess, afloat or ashore, may be paid to the mess to which they are assigned.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 380, §6084; renumbered §8244, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(8), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1835.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6084 | 34 U.S.C. 908. | July 1, 1902, ch. 1368, 32 Stat. 680 (4th par.); Mar. 14, 1940, ch. 53, 54 Stat. 50. |

The words "basic allowance for subsistence" are substituted for the words "money accruing from the commuted rations" to conform to the terminology of §301 of the Career Compensation Act of 1949 (37 U.S.C. 251). Section 301 of the Career Compensation Act of 1949 supersedes the authority of the Secretary of the Navy to commute the rations of enlisted members and authorizes in lieu thereof a basic allowance for subsistence. The words "enlisted members of the naval service" are substituted for the words "enlisted men" for uniformity of expression and for clarity. The word "legally" is omitted as surplusage. The words "and subsisting in" are inserted to make it clear that the mess must actually subsist the enlisted members assigned before the basic allowance of the members may be paid to the mess. The words "to which they are assigned" are inserted for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6084 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1740]


Approval of Manufacturing Authority, Foreign-Trade Zone 134, 
Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC (Motor 
Vehicles), Chattanooga, TN

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Chattanooga Chamber Foundation, grantee of FTZ 134, 
has requested manufacturing authority on behalf of Volkswagen Group of 
America Chattanooga Operations, LLC, within FTZ 134--Site 3, 
Chattanooga, Tennessee (FTZ Docket 35-2009, filed 8-19-2009);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (74 FR 43670, 8-27-2009) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations would be satisfied, and that the proposal would 
be in the public interest if subject to the restriction listed below;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application for manufacturing authority under zone procedures 
within FTZ 134 on behalf of Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga 
Operations, LLC, as described in the application and Federal Register 
notice, is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28, and further subject to the 
following condition:

    VGACO must admit all foreign man-made fiber and cotton bags 
(HTSUS Subheadings 4202.12.8030, 4202.12.8070, 6305.20), netting 
(5608.19, 5608.90), sun blinds (6306.19), felt (5602.90) and 
cushions (9404.90) to the zone under privileged foreign status (19 
CFR 146.41) or domestic (duty-paid) status (19 CFR 146.43).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of February 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

ATTEST:----------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4175 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
### §625. Authority to vacate promotions to grades of brigadier general and rear admiral (lower half)

(a) The President may vacate the promotion to the grade of brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half) of an officer who has served less than 18 months in that grade after promotion to that grade under this chapter.

(b) An officer of the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps whose promotion is vacated under this section holds the regular grade of colonel, if he is a regular officer, or the reserve grade of colonel, if he is a reserve officer. An officer of the Navy whose promotion is vacated under this section holds the regular grade of captain, if he is a regular officer, or the reserve grade of captain, if he is a reserve officer.

(c) The position on the active-duty list of an officer whose promotion is vacated under this section is the position he would have held had he not been promoted to the grade of brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half).

(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, §105, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2858; amended Pub. L. 97–86, title IV, §405(b)(1), (4)(A), Dec. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 1105; Pub. L. 99–145, title V, §514(b)(1), (4)(A), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 628; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §924(b)(3)(H), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3821; Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1722(b)(4), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 668.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 118–31 substituted "or Marine Corps" for "Marine Corps, or Space Force".

2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "Marine Corps, or Space Force" for "or Marine Corps".

1985—Pub. L. 99–145 substituted "rear admiral (lower half)" for "commodore" in section catchline and subsecs. (a) and (c).

1981—Pub. L. 97–86 substituted "commodore" for "commodore admiral" in section catchline and subsecs. (a) and (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–86 effective Sept. 15, 1981, see section 405(f) of Pub. L. 97–86, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to prescribe regulations under this section effective on Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
### §7272. Distinguished-service cross: award

The President may award a distinguished-service cross of appropriate design, with ribbons and appurtenances, to a person who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguishes himself by extraordinary heroism not justifying the award of a medal of honor—

(1) while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States;

(2) while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force; or

(3) while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 215, §3742; Pub. L. 88–77, §1(2), July 25, 1963, 77 Stat. 93; renumbered §7272, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(11), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3742 | 10:1406. | July 9, 1918, ch. 143 (9th par. under "Ordnance Department"), 40 Stat. 870. |

The words "but not in the name of Congress" are omitted as surplusage, since a medal is presented in the name of Congress only if the law so directs. The words "since the 6th day of April, 1917" are omitted as executed. The word "award" is substituted for the word "present" to cover the determination of the recipients as well as the actual presentation of the medal, and to conform to other sections of this chapter. The words "or herself" are omitted, since, under section 1 of title 1, words importing the masculine gender include the feminine. The words "or who shall hereafter distinguish" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3742 of this title as this section.

1963—Pub. L. 88–77 enlarged authority to award the distinguished-service cross, which was limited to those cases in which persons distinguished themselves in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, to permit its award for extraordinary heroism not justifying award of a medal of honor, while engaged in an action against an enemy of United States, while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force, or while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which United States is not a belligerent party.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### Frances E. Moore v. The Board of Education.

Motion granted.
# C_2006278EN.01000101.xml

| 16.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 November 2006

(2006/C 278/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2792 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 151,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67840 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0870 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5990 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,35 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2460 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5777 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,106 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 257,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8115 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4988 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,58 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 35,770 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8550 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6733 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4572 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9607 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9406 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9959 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 204,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3557 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0656 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3465 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 746,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6659 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,082 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1260 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,738 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2792

JPY

Japanese yen

151,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67840

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0870

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5990

ISK

Iceland króna

90,35

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2460

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5777

CZK

Czech koruna

28,106

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

257,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8115

RON

Romanian leu

3,4988

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,58

SKK

Slovak koruna

35,770

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8550

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6733

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4572

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9607

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9406

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9959

KRW

South Korean won

1 204,30

ZAR

South African rand

9,3557

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0656

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3465

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 746,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6659

PHP

Philippine peso

64,082

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1260

THB

Thai baht

46,738

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

 

                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Composite Solutions, Inc. (“Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersignedChairman of the Board of Directors of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:  1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

 

 
| /s/ Dr. Gil Hegemier       |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Dr. Gil Hegemier, Chairman |   |

 

August 18, 2003

 

 

 

----
# C_2015230EN.01012701.xml

| 14.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/127

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the measures that the Union may take following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters (codification)’

COM(2014) 317 final — 2014/0163 (COD)

(2015/C 230/28)

On 20 October 2014, the European Parliament decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the measures that the Union may take following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters (codification)

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the measures that the Union may take following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters (codification)

COM(2014) 317 final — 2014/0163 (COD).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 503rd plenary session of 10 and 11 December 2014 (meeting of 10 December), by 148 votes to 3 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 10 December 2014.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Henri MALOSSE

---
H. Res. 528

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 21, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 90) withdrawing the approval of the United States

from the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization. The joint resolution shall be considered as read for

amendment. The joint resolution shall be debatable for two

hours of debate equally divided among and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Ways and Means, Representative Paul of Texas, and Representative DeFazio of Oregon or their designees. Pursuant

to section 152 of the Trade Act of 1974 and section 125 of

the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, the previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final

passage without intervening motion.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit99.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The RiceX Company (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Daniel L. McPeak, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Daniel L. McPeak, Sr.            |
|--------------------------------------|
| Daniel L. McPeak, Sr.                |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 12, 2002                      |

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

 

 

 

----
#### § 48.101 Who may enter into a lease on behalf of a Bureau-operated school?

Only the Director or the Director's designee may enter into leases.
#### § 183.17 If expenditures under this part lead to a claim or cause of action, who is liable?

The Tribe may be liable. The United States must not be liable for any claim or cause of action arising from the Tribe's use or expenditure of monies distributed from the Trust Fund or the Lease Fund.
Enclosure to Boeing Letter 

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-12-0332 

Page 1 of 4 

 
Enclosure to Boeing Letter 

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-12-0332 

Page 2 of 4 

 
Enclosure to Boeing Letter 

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-12-0332 

Page 3 of 4 

 

 
Enclosure to Boeing Letter 

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-12-0332 

Page 4 of 4
### §2892. Maintenance work order system for housing units

(a) Electronic Work Order System Required.—The Secretary of Defense shall require that each landlord of a housing unit have an electronic work order system to track all maintenance requests relating to the housing unit.

(b) Access by Department Personnel.—The Secretary of Defense shall require each landlord of a housing unit to provide access to the maintenance work order system of the landlord relating to the housing unit to the following persons:

(1) Personnel of the housing management office at the installation for which the housing unit is provided.

(2) Personnel of the installation and engineer command or center of the military department concerned.

(3) Such other personnel of the Department of Defense as the Secretary determines necessary.

(c) Access by Tenants.—The Secretary of Defense shall require each landlord of a housing unit to provide access to the maintenance work order system of the landlord relating to the housing unit to the tenant of the housing unit to permit the tenant, at a minimum, to track the status and progress of work orders for maintenance requests relating to the housing unit.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–92, div. B, title XXX, §§3017, 3018, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1930.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–92, §3018, added subsec. (c).
# C_2006261EN.01003003.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/30

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2006 — Jongste v Commission

(Case T-249/99) (1)

1

(2006/C 261/59)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 8.1.2000.

1

---
#### § 18.5 Certified copies.

The certified copies or duplicate originals of each document must be submitted with the original. Each copy or duplicate must be entirely clear and legible.

[54 FR 9681, Mar. 7, 1989]
§ 518.8 What is the hearing process? ( a ) Within 10 days of receipt of the request for a hearing, the Office of Self-Regulation shall notify the tribe of the date and place of the hearing. The notice shall also set a hearing schedule, the time allotted for testimony and oral argument, and the order of the presentation. ( 1 ) To the extent possible, the hearing will be scheduled not later than 60 days after the notice is issued, and the hearing schedule will be issued at least 30 days prior to the hearing.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) The Commission shall issue a decision on the petition within 30 days after the hearing's conclusion. The decision shall set forth, with particularity, findings regarding the tribe's satisfaction of the self-regulation standards in this Part. If the Commission determines that a certificate will issue, it will do so in accordance with § 518.9 of this part.
( c ) The decision of the Commission to approve or deny a petition shall be a final agency action.
[78 FR 20241, Apr. 4, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 37115, June 20, 2013]