alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8856. Duties of United States attorney

(a) The interests of the United States in a prize cause shall be represented by the United States attorney for the judicial district in which the prize cause is adjudicated. The United States attorney shall protect the interests of the United States and shall examine all fees, costs, and expenses sought to be charged against the prize fund.

(b) In a judicial district where one or more prize causes are pending the United States attorney shall send to the Secretary of the Navy, at least once every three months, a statement of all such causes in the form and covering the particulars required by the Secretary.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 475, §7656; renumbered §8856, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7656 | 34 U.S.C. 1136. | R.S. 4619. |

The Act of March 3, 1899, ch. 413, §13, 30 Stat. 1007, which repealed all laws authorizing the distribution of prize money to captors, rendered inoperative parts of R.S. 4619 relative to protection of captors' interest. These parts are omitted from 34 U.S.C. 1136 and from the revised section.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7656 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### §§ 224.72-224.73 [Reserved]
§ 36.93 Is a homeliving handbook required? Yes, each program must publish a homeliving handbook, which may be incorporated into a general student handbook. During the first week the students and staff are in the dormitory, the homeliving program must: ( a ) Provide each student with a copy of the handbook that contains all the provisions in 36.94;
( b ) Provide all staff, students, and parents or guardians with a current and updated copy of student rights and responsibilities;
( c ) Conduct an orientation for all students on the handbook and student rights and responsibilities; and
( d ) Ensure that all students, school staff, and to the extent possible, parents and guardians confirm in writing that they have received a copy of and understand the homeliving handbook.
PDR NO. DANIEL FRANK LONGORIA JR. Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee. IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL 

## APPEALSATAUSTIN,.H5QC£L.W1W1^,,_ COURTOFCRfiWTNALAPPEALS JUW2 62015 

### MOTIONFORANEXTENTIONOFTIMETOFILEA AbelACGStaClerk
PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW GOMES NOW, Daniel Frank Longoria Jr., Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and files his motion for an extention 

### of time^pursuant to rule 68.2(c) of the Texas Rules of Appfen/ia^e COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS Procedure, and shows this Honorable Court GOOD CAUSE to GRANT JUN 26 2015 this motion as follows: 

### 1- The Appellant was affirmed onJune 25, 2014,Afe^el$S@SMiCUfork District Court of Appeals at Beaumont. See Longoria v. State, 

### No. 09-13-00169-GR (Tex.App. —Beaumont June 25, 2014)(not design ated for publication). The Appelant filed a Habeas proceeding seeking for an out-of-time Petition, and this Honorable Court Gra nted relief on June 3, 2015. See Ex Parte Daniel F. Longoria, Jr. No. WR-83,036-01 (Tex.Crim.App. June 03, 2015)(Not designated for publication). 2* There has been ho motion for rehearing filed or en banc reconsideration filed, that the Appellant knows of. Additional ly, there has been- no other extention of time filed within this Honorable Court. 3* The Appellant is seeking for a 60 day extention in order for the Appellant to properly file his Petition in a proper man ner. The due date is currently July 3, 2015. The 60 day extenpage 1

### tion will set the proposed date to September 1, 2015. 

### 4* The Appellant is currentlywithout counsel forhis help, and is proceeding in the pro se status. 

## 5- Being alayman in the law, the CoffieldUnit's law library only allows for offenders to have 10-15 hours per.week to conduct 

## their research, properlyprepare for filing, andreply to any Court documents required. 6* The Appellant believes that he canmeet the deadline on 

### September 1, 2015, in order-for. this Honorable Court to review in
a timely manner.
PRAYER The Appellant prays that this Honorable Court will GRANT this 

### motion and reset the due date to September 1, 2015, or in the air ternative, reset the current due date to a reasonable time frame 

### in order for the Appellant to properly file his petition on his
own behalf./
INMATE DECLARATION 

### I, Daniel F. Longoria Jr.,. #01851803, being currently incar 

### cerated in the TDCJ-CID Coffield unit in. Anderson County, Texas, 

### declares that the foregoing is true and correct under the penalty of perjury. EXECUTED THIS DAY OFJUNE 15, 2015.

Daniel Frank 'tongoria Jr. Coffield unit

-- #01851803 2661 FM 2054 Tenn.Colony, Tx. 75884 Pro se.

PROOF OF MAILING 

### I, Daniel F. Longoria Jr., #01851803, declares under the penpage 2

### alty of perjury that Ihave placed this motion in the internal mail box of the Coffield unit in Anderson County, Texas on June 15, 2015.


### Daniel FrankT^ongoria Jr. Coffield unit

-- #01851803 2661 FM 2054 Tenn.Colony, Tx. 75884 Pro se.

page 3 of 3
## THE STATE OF TEXAS
MANDATE

TO THE 354TH DISTRIC T COURT OF HUNT COUN TY, GREETINGS:
Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 9th
day of November, A.D. 2017, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

John Michael Shaver, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 17

- 00086

- CR

Trial Court No. 30,852

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We note that the appellant, John Michael Shaver, has adequately indicated his inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this
behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Co urt of Appeals, with
the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 4th day of January , A.D. 2018

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
IV

House Calendar No. 268

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 565

[Report No. 106–797]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 4516) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 4516) making appropriations

for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending

September 30, 2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 4516) making appropriations for

4 the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending Sep5 tember 30, 2001, and for other purposes. All points of

6 order against the conference report and against its consid-
2

HRES 565 RH

1 eration are waived. The conference report shall be consid2 ered as read.

House Calendar No. 268

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 565

[Report No. 106–797]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reother purposes. fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the port to accompany the bill (H.R. 4516) making

JULY 27, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
  PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SEC. 1350 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

     Each of the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 4, 2010              /s/ Tal Gilat
                                ------------------------
                                Tal Gilat, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: May 4, 2010              /s/ Tzlil Peker
                                ------------------------
                                Tzlil Peker, Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
#### U. S. S. Lead Refinery *v.*Devetak.

[No. 12,174.

Filed April 2, 1925.]

1. Master and *Servant.—Award of Industrial Board not reversed for incompetent evidence if there is competent evidence to sustain*it.—The Appellate Court will not reverse an award of the Industrial Board because of the admission of incompetent evidence if there is competent evidence to sustain it. p. 618.

2. Master and *Servant.—Award not justified where claimant’s medical experts testified ailment not attributable to his em*ployment.—An award of compensation is not justified where claimant’s medical experts described his ailment as a disease and were unable to say that it resulted from his employment or the conditions thereof, p. 618.

From Industrial Board of Indiana.

Claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Daniel Devetak against the U. S. S. Lead Refinery. From an award for claimant, the defendant appeals.

*Reversed.*

*William J. Whinery,*for appellant.

*618Nichols, J.

from an award of the Industrial Board granting compensation to appellee as an employee of appellant.

1,2. Appellant denies liability for such compensation on the ground that no accident had occurred; and that appellee was simply suffering from a disease known as eczema, and nothing else. Appellee was permitted to read in evidence, over the objection of appellant, a statement or report which purported to have been made by one of appellee’s physicians, describing his affliction and giving the cause thereof. Such statement was incompetent but we will not reverse an award of the Industrial Board because of incompetent evidence if there is competent evidence to sustain the same. But the evidence, aside from this statement was wholly insufficient to sustain the award. When appellee’s own witnesses, medical experts, de-* scribed his ailment as a disease, and were unable to say that it resulted from the conditions of his employment, then the board was not justified in finding that appellee was entitled to compensation because of an accidental injury received in the course of his employment.

The award is reversed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**CARL OXHOLM, III**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM RETIRED STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 182 DB 2015 (No. 93 RST 2015)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 30137** 

**(Philadelphia)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 6 th**  **day of January, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated December 24, 2015, is ap proved and it is ORDERED**  **that Carl Oxholm, III, who has been on Retired Statu s, has never been suspended or**  **disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and**  **learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is,**  **hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Ba r of this Commonwealth. The**  **expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall**  **be paid by the Petitioner.**
#### § 242.2 Authority to engage in commercial fishing.

No person shall engage in commercial fishing in the waters of the Red Lakes on the Red Lake Indian Reservation in the State of Minnesota except the Red Lake Fisheries Association, a corporation organized and incorporated under the laws of Minnesota, and its members, and then only in accordance with the regulations in this part. The authority hereby granted to the Association and its members to engage in commercial fishing may, at any time, be canceled and withdrawn and these regulations may be modified and amended.
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of April 1, 2012, by and among JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities
Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
and Certificate Administrator, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank,
National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank, National Association as
Trustee and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates JP Morgan 2012-C6 (the
"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
   January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of
   its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my
   supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th
day of March 2014.


/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
# C_2006281EN.01001901.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat im Land Niederösterreich (Austria) lodged on 10 August 2006 — Gottfried Heinrich

(Case C-345/06)

(2006/C 281/30)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat im Land Niederösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gottfried Heinrich

Applicant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Do documents within the meaning of Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (1) include acts which are required to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union pursuant to Article 254 EC? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do documents within the meaning of Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (1) include acts which are required to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union pursuant to Article 254 EC?

1

| 2. | Do regulations or parts thereof have binding force if, contrary to the requirement of Article 254(2) EC, they are not published in the Official Journal of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do regulations or parts thereof have binding force if, contrary to the requirement of Article 254(2) EC, they are not published in the Official Journal of the European Union?

---

(1)  OJ L 145, p. 43.

1

---
#### § 37.125 Can an eligible student living off a reservation attend a school or dorm?

Yes. An eligible student living off a reservation can attend a day school, on-reservation boarding school, or peripheral dorm.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francis K. Anzalone, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 750]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Patricia D. Marks, J.), rendered September 15, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed. Present— Hurlbutt, A.EJ., Martoche, Centra and Pine, JJ.
----

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |
| 001-10315                | 63-0860407 |
| (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|                     |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| (d)    |   | Exhibits. |
|   |   |
| 99.1   |   | Press Release of HealthSouth Corporation, dated November 24, 2014. |
| 99.2   |   | Supplemental slides provided in connection with the conference call of HealthSouth Corporation on November 24, 2014 relating to the signing of an agreement to acquire Encompass Home Health and Hospice. |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   |   |   |
| By:    | /S/   DOUGLAS E. COLTHARP |
|   | Name: | Douglas E. Coltharp |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
§ 273.207 How does a contractor request dispute resolution? The contractor may request dispute resolution in writing to the BIE Director. ( a ) The Bureau has in place an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. ( 1 ) The ADR process is intended to be a supplement to, and not a replacement for, the normal appeal process.
( 2 ) Participation as a complainant in the ADR process is voluntary.
( 3 ) Should a contractor participate in an ADR process, the pre-complaint process may extend to 90 days.
( b ) The ADR process may result in an informal resolution of the complaint;
( c ) If the ADR process does not result in an informal resolution of the complaint, the contractor still has the right to continue to pursue an appeal.
§ 169.408 What is the process for cancelling a right-of-way for non-use or abandonment? ( a ) We may cancel, in whole or in part, any rights-of-way granted under this part 30 days after mailing written notice to the grantee at its latest address, for a nonuse of the right-of-way for a consecutive 2-year period for the purpose for which it was granted. If the grantee fails to correct the basis for cancellation by the 30th day after we mailed the notice, we will issue an appropriate instrument cancelling the right-of-way and transmit it to the LTRO pursuant to part 150 of this chapter for recording and filing.
( b ) We may cancel, in whole or in part, any rights-of-way granted under this part immediately upon abandonment of the right-of-way by the grantee. We will issue an appropriate instrument cancelling the right-of-way and transmit it to the LTRO pursuant to part 150 of this chapter for recording and filing.
( c ) The cancellation notice will notify the grantee of the grantee's right to appeal under part 2 of this chapter, including the possibility of that the official to whom the appeal is made will require the grantee to post an appeal bond.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HOST
MARRIOTT, L.P. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 26, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-1999
<CASH>                                             284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      279
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           8,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          2,545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,171
<SALES>                                            286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   307
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     58
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 58
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        58 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>