alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Composite Solutions, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned President and CEOof the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that based on his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for theperiods covered in the Report.

 

 
| */s/  Dr. Thomas C. Bache*                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  Dr. Thomas  C. Bache, President & CEO |
|                                            |
| May 14, 2004                                    |

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Mission Accomplished! Forager Fury II concludes

By Lance Cpl. Antonio RubioMarine Corps Air Station Iwakuni

                ANDERSEN AIR BASE, Guam  –              http://www.dvidshub.net/news/118437/mission-accomplished-forager-fury-ii-concludes#ixzz2nxQaa0zphttp://www.dvids.net/

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
**MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION**
**EXHIBIT 11**
**STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE**           **Three Months Ended**  **September 30,**  **2004** **2003**Net Income $239,665  $546,877          Weighted average common shares outstandingfor basic computation  372,600   372,600          Basic earnings per share $0.64  $1.47          Weighted average common shares outstandingfor basic computation  372,600   372,600 Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effectof stock options  —   —          Weighted average common shares and equivalentsOutstanding for diluted computation  372,600   372,600          Diluted earnings per share $0.64  $1.47
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     UT
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      4,045,251
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      308,578
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,089,976
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         941,373
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,385,178
<COMMON>                                           1,402
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      2,425,538
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              501,025
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 2,927,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            363,000
<PREFERRED>                                       84,485
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,637,491
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                     0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                              0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      1,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                              0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,371,237
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  6,385,178
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        539,362
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              10,380
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       477,785
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       488,165
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           51,197
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 5,548
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    56,745
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          33,756
<NET-INCOME>                                      22,989
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        8,690
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                     14,299
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          63,323
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                         34,290
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           199,049
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.10



</TABLE>
### §8631. Accounting for expenditures for obtaining information

When the Secretary of the Navy decides that an expenditure by the Department of the Navy from an appropriation for obtaining information from anywhere in the world may be made public, the expenditure shall be accounted for specifically. When the Secretary decides that an expenditure should not be made public, the Secretary shall make a certificate on the amount of the expenditure. The certificate is a sufficient voucher for the amount stated to have been spent.

(Added Pub. L. 97–258, §2(b)(11)(B), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1057, §7231; renumbered §8631, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7231 | 31:108. | Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 417 (2d proviso under heading "Pay, Miscellaneous"), 39 Stat. 557. |

The words "anywhere in the world" are substituted for "abroad and at home", and the words "decides that an expenditure should not be made public" are substituted for "may think it advisable not to specify", for clarity and consistency.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8631, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 532, prohibited any officer of Air Force who was engaged in procurement or sale of quartermaster supplies from dealing in said supplies, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 90–235, §7(b)(1), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 763.

A prior section 8632, act Aug. 10, 1946, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 532, provided for forfeiture of pay during absence from duty due to disease from intemperate use of alcohol or drugs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 87–649, §14c(54), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 501, effective Nov. 1, 1962. See section 802 of Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7231 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00367-CV

Indemnity Insurance Corp. f/k/a Indemnity Insurance Corp. of DC, RRG, Appellant

v.

Austin Lucky Lounge, LP; Austin Lucky Lounge GP, LLC; William Muntz; and

Kenneth George Blank, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-11-002076, HONORABLE GUS J. STRAUSS, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant Indemnity Insurance Corp. f/k/a Indemnity Insurance Corp. of DC, RRG

(Indemnity) has filed a “Notice of Liquidation,” advising the Court that, on April 10, 2014, a

Delaware Chancery Court signed a “Liquidation and Injunction Order” that (1) placed Indemnity in

liquidation, (2) appointed the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Delaware as Indemnity’s

receiver, (3) enjoined all legal and equitable proceedings against Indemnity, and (4) enjoined for

180 days all litigation in which Indemnity is contractually obligated to provide a defense, unless

approved by the receiver or Delaware court. Accordingly, Indemnity requests that the appeal in this

case be stayed indefinitely.
We grant Indemnity’s request and abate the appeal until further order of this Court. 

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Abated

Filed: July 3, 2014

2
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00009

- CV

Ali Mohandesi and Erika Dahl

- Stamnes , Appellant s

v.

Ryan McCarley , Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C

- 1

- CV

- 18

- 006514 , THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant s Ali Mohandesi and Erika Dahl

- Stamnes ha ve filed an unoppos ed

moti on to dismiss this appeal. We g rant appellant s ’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.1(a)

.

___________ _______________________________ Thomas J. Baker , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker

, and Smith

Dismissed on Appellant s ’ Motion

Filed: August 1 7 , 2021
#### § 2.714 May the reviewing official's decision on Tribal representative recognition be appealed?

Yes. The reviewing official's decision is immediately effective, but not final for the Department. Therefore, any participant may appeal the reviewing official's decision as provided for in this part, or pursue judicial review in Federal court. Notwithstanding any other regulation, the reviewing official's Tribal representative recognition decision shall remain in effect and binding on the Department unless and until the reviewing official's decision is reversed by superior agency authority or reversed or stayed by order of a Federal court.
# C_2013166EN.01000101.xml

| 12.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/1

---

Communication from the Commission relating to the available quantity for the September 2013 subperiod in the framework of certain quotas opened by the European Union for products in the rice sector

2013/C 166/01

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 opened tariff quotas for the import of rice originating in the overseas countries and territories (OCT) (1). No import licence applications have been submitted during the first seven days of May 2013 for the quotas with order number 09.4189 and 09.4190.

1

In accordance with the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities for which applications are not submitted are to be added to the following subperiod.

2

In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 1(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009, quantities available in the following subperiod are communicated by the Commission before the 25th day of the last month of a given subperiod.

As a result, the total available quantity for the September 2013 subperiod under the quotas with order number 09.4189 and 09.4190 as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 are set out in the Annex to this communication.

---

(1)  OJ L 344, 23.12.2009, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

Quantities available for the following subperiod under Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009

| Origin | Order number | Import licence applications introduced for the May 2013 subperiod | Total available quantity for the September 2013 subperiod
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Netherlands Antilles and Aruba | 09.4189 | (1) | 25 000 000 |
| Least developed OCTs | 09.4190 | (1) | 10 000 000 |

Origin

Order number

Import licence applications introduced for the May 2013 subperiod

Total available quantity for the September 2013 subperiod

(in kg)

Netherlands Antilles and Aruba

09.4189

(1)

25 000 000

Least developed OCTs

09.4190

(1)

10 000 000

---

(1)  No allocation coefficient for this subperiod: no licence applications were sent to the Commission.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 567 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 270
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 567

                          [Report No. 106-799]

 Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for 
   adjournment of the House and Senate for the summer district work 
                                period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for 
   adjournment of the House and Senate for the summer district work 
                                period.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order, any rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, to 
consider a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of the House 
and Senate for the summer district work period.

                                                 House Calendar No. 270

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 567

                          [Report No. 106-799]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for 
   adjournment of the House and Senate for the summer district work 
                                period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 27, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Searched for **http://www.nmb.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.nmb.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
### §776. Applicability of chapter

This chapter applies in—

(1) the United States;

(2) the territories, commonwealths, and possessions of the United States; and

(3) all other places under the jurisdiction of the United States.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 36, §774; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title XIII, §1343(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3992; Pub. L. 100–26, §3(6), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 273; renumbered §775, Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title V, §508(a)(1), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1086; renumbered §776, Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title III, §377(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2386.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 774 | 10:1393 (less 1st and last pars.). | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §125 (less 1st and last pars.), 39 Stat. 216; Apr. 15, 1948, ch. 188, 62 Stat. 172; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21 (as applicable to §125 of the Act of June 3, 1916, ch. 134), 62 Stat. 864; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §§15(b) (less last par.), 142 (as applicable to the Act of Apr. 15, 1948, ch. 188), 63 Stat. 91, 110. |

The words "the Canal Zone, Guam, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands as well as to * * * other" are omitted as covered by the words "possessions, and all other places under its jurisdiction".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–484 renumbered section 775 of this title as this section.

1987—Pub. L. 100–180 renumbered section 774 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 100–26 amended directory language of Pub. L. 99–661. See 1986 Amendment note below.

1986—Pub. L. 99–661, as amended by Pub. L. 100–26, amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "This chapter applies in the United States, the Territories, Commonwealths, and possessions, and all other places under its jurisdiction."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1987 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–26, §12(a), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 289, provided that: "The amendments made by section 3 [amending this section and sections 1032, 1408, 1450, 1588, 2007, 2364, and 5150 of this title, and section 4703 of Title 20, Education, and amending provisions set out as a note under section 1006 of Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services] shall apply as if included in Public Law 99–661 when enacted on November 14, 1986."
### [§2304e. Renumbered §3901]
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                     U.S.C.
                                 SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  KeySpan  Corporation  (the
"Corporation")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert B.  Catell,  Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Corporation,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Corporation.


                                                  /s/ Robert B. Catell
                                                  --------------------
                                                  Name: Robert B. Catell
                                                  Title: Chairman  and Chief
                                                  Executive Officer
                                                  Date: May 1, 2003
# C_2006165EN.01003502.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/35

---

Action brought on 12 May 2006 — Sapara v Eurojust

(Case F-61/06)

(2006/C 165/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cathy Sapara (The Hague, The Netherlands) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and C. Ronzi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Eurojust

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 6 July 2005 to terminate the applicant's contract and order her reintegration in Eurojust from that date; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 6 July 2005 to terminate the applicant's contract and order her reintegration in Eurojust from that date;

| — | order the compensation of the prejudice suffered by the applicant, evaluated on a provisional basis ex aequo et bono at EUR 200 000 for the moral prejudice and the payment of the salary of the applicant from July 2005 to 15 October 2009 for the material prejudice; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the compensation of the prejudice suffered by the applicant, evaluated on a provisional basis ex aequo et bono at EUR 200 000 for the moral prejudice and the payment of the salary of the applicant from July 2005 to 15 October 2009 for the material prejudice;

| — | order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a former temporary agent of Eurojust, challenges the decision to terminate her contract at the end of the probationary period.

In support of her claims, she relies on the following pleas:

| — | infringement of Article 14 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities (CEOS) and of Article 9 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 14 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities (CEOS) and of Article 9 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | breach of the general principle of law imposing the motivation of any act affecting the applicant's interests; |
| --- | --- |

—

breach of the general principle of law imposing the motivation of any act affecting the applicant's interests;

| — | flagrant errors in the appraisal of facts leading to errors in law; |
| --- | --- |

—

flagrant errors in the appraisal of facts leading to errors in law;

| — | breach of the general principle of good administration and of the rights of defence; |
| --- | --- |

—

breach of the general principle of good administration and of the rights of defence;

| — | misuse of power. |
| --- | --- |

—

misuse of power.

As regards the request for compensation, the applicant considers that she has been the victim of harassment an that she has been defamed on several occasions.

---