alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 36.92 Are there any activities that must be offered by a homeliving program? Yes, a homeliving program must make available the following activities: ( a ) One hour per day of scheduled, structured physical activity Monday through Thursday, and two hours of scheduled physical activities on the weekends for any students who are in residence on the weekends;
( b ) One hour per day of scheduled, structured study at least four days per week for all students, and additional study time for students who are failing any classes;
( c ) Tutoring during study time;
( d ) Native language or cultural activities; and
( e ) Wellness program that may include character, health, wellness, and sex education.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS
                          PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SEC. 1350

     Each of the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge:

     (i)  That the Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
          2010 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (ii) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2010         /s/ Tal Gilat
                                 ------------------------
                                 Tal Gilat, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: November 15, 2010         /s/ David (Dadi) Avner
                                 ----------------------
                                 David (Dadi) Avner, Chief Financial Officer
                                 (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.3

                             RAILWORKS CORPORATION
                             1104 KENILWORTH DRIVE
                                   SUITE 301
                              BALTIMORE, MD 21204

                               September 20, 1999


Mr. Michael R. Azarela
12310 Cleghorn Road
Cockeysville, MD  21030

RE:  AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED
     AUGUST 4, 1998 ("AGREEMENT") BETWEEN MICHAEL R. AZARELA
     AND RAILWORKS CORPORATION ("CORPORATION")

Dear Mr. Azarela:

         This letter serves as an amendment ("Amendment") to the Agreement.
Commencing as of June 1, 1999, on the second and third lines of Section 3.1(a)
of the Agreement "Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00) per annum" is
deemed deleted, and replaced with the following: "Two Hundred Seventy-Five
Thousand Dollars ($275,000.00) per annum". This Amendment is deemed retroactive
and effective as of June 1, 1999.

         Except as specifically provided herein, the Agreement remains in full
force and effect, and is neither amended nor modified.

         Please acknowledge your agreement to the Amendment by signing and
returning a copy to the undersigned.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        RAILWORKS CORPORATION



                                        By: /s/    Michael R. Azarela
                                            -----------------------------------
/jdc                                        Name:  Michael R. Azarela
                                            Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


AGREED TO:



/s/ John G. Larkin                9/99
----------------------------------
    John G. Larkin
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.131 What placement preferences apply in foster-care or preadoptive placements? ( a ) In any foster-care or preadoptive placement of an Indian child under State law, including changes in foster-care or preadoptive placements, the child must be placed in the least-restrictive setting that: ( 1 ) Most approximates a family, taking into consideration sibling attachment;
( 2 ) Allows the Indian child's special needs (if any) to be met; and
( 3 ) Is in reasonable proximity to the Indian child's home, extended family, or siblings.
( b ) In any foster-care or preadoptive placement of an Indian child under State law, where the Indian child's Tribe has not established a different order of preference under paragraph (c) of this section, preference must be given, in descending order as listed below, to placement of the child with: ( 1 ) A member of the Indian child's extended family;
( 2 ) A foster home that is licensed, approved, or specified by the Indian child's Tribe;
( 3 ) An Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-Indian licensing authority; or
( 4 ) An institution for children approved by an Indian Tribe or operated by an Indian organization which has a program suitable to meet the child's needs.
( c ) If the Indian child's Tribe has established by resolution a different order of preference than that specified in ICWA, the Tribe's placement preferences apply, so long as the placement is the least-restrictive setting appropriate to the particular needs of the Indian child, as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) The court must, where appropriate, also consider the preference of the Indian child or the Indian child's parent.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The People of the Drought States

              																	Taueber, Conrad					,	Taylor, Carl C.					 and 	United States. Works Progress Administration. 						*The People of the Drought States, Series V, No. 2*,										March 1937,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/837,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Order entered May 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01513-CV

REBECCA POTTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF AUSTYN 

VASQUEZ, A MINOR, AND RICHARD POTTER, Appellant

V.

HP TEXAS 1 LLC D/B/A HPA TX LLC, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-18-1376

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee Coats Group Real Estate Co. d/b/a CGC Construction’s May 

16, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file brief tendered. We GRANT the motion and 

ORDER the brief received May 16, 2019 filed as of the date of this order. 

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three month period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy C. Coxson, Chief Financial
Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Coxson  
|Timothy C. Coxson      
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 14, 2004           



24
#### § 39.600 Are Bureau-operated school board expenses funded by ISEP limited?

Yes. Bureau-operated schools are limited to $8,000 or one percent (1%) of ISEP allotted funds (not to exceed $15,000).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,187
<PP&E>                                           3,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,069,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,510
<COMMON>                                        13,114
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,210,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,037
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,514,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,533,126)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.090)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.090)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Patrick Yount, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hudson
Respiratory Care Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control of over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

                  a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

                  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date:    November 14, 2003                 /s/ Patrick Yount
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Patrick Yount
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Exhibit 34.2

** **

**Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board ofDirectors

Citibank, N.A.:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank,N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (*i.e.*, transaction-level reporting initially required under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately-issued (*i.e.*, for which transaction-level reporting is requiredpursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backedsecurities issued on or after January 1, 2006, as listed in Appendix A of the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance,for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv),1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Companyhas determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months endedDecember 31, 2013. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibilityis to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing suchother procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either priorto or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,2013 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2014
§ 175.145 Can I appeal a BIA decision? ( a ) You may appeal a decision in accordance with the procedures set out in 25 CFR part 2, unless otherwise prohibited by law.
( b ) If the appeal involves the discontinuation of service, the utility is not required to resume the service during the appeal process unless the customer meets the utility's requirements.
( c ) If you appeal your bill, you must pay your bill in accordance with this part to continue to receive service from us. ( 1 ) If the appeal involves the amount of your bill, the bill will be considered paid under protest until the final decision has been rendered on appeal.
( 2 ) If you appeal your bill but do not pay the bill in full, you may not continue to receive service from us. If the final decision rendered in the appeal requires payment of the bill, the bill will be handled as a delinquent account and the amount of the bill may be subject to interest, penalties, and administrative costs pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 31 CFR 901.9.
( 3 ) If the appeal involves an electric power rate, the rate will be applied and remain in effect subject to the final decision on the appeal.
# C_2006248EN.01000201.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/2

---

New national side of euro circulation coins

(2006/C 248/02)

Image

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing anyone required to handle coins in the course of their work and the public at large. In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the 2 euro denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the obverse national side.

1

2

Issuing State: Finland

Subject of commemoration: 100th anniversary of the universal and equal suffrage

Factual description of the design: the inner part of the coin shows male and female faces separated by a line. On the left side of the coin, is the date 1 October 1906 and on the right side, is the year with the imbedded country abbreviation 20 FI 06. The mint mark ‘M’ appears at the left of each face. The twelve stars of the European flag are depicted on the outer ring.

Issuing volume: max 2,5 million coins

Approximate issuing date: October 2006

Edge lettering: ‘SUOMI FINLAND * * *’ where the * stands for a lion's head.

---

(1)  See OJ C 373 of 28.12.2001, p. 1 for a reference to all national sides that were issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264 of 15.10.2003, p. 38).

2

---
#### § 39.731 Can transportation time be used as instruction time for day school students?

No. Transportation time cannot be used as instruction time for day school students in meeting the minimum required hours for academic funding.
### **CHAPTER 33A—APPOINTMENT, PROMOTION, AND INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION AND RETIREMENT FOR MEMBERS ON THE WARRANT OFFICER ACTIVE-DUTY LIST**

Sec.
571.
Warrant officers: grades.
572.
Warrant officers: original appointment; service credit.
573.
Convening of selection boards.
574.
Warrant officer active-duty lists; competitive categories; number to be recommended for promotion; promotion zones.
575.
Recommendations for promotion by selection boards.
576.
Information to be furnished to selection boards; selection procedures.
577.
Promotions: effect of failure of selection for.
578.
Promotions: how made; effective date.
579.
Removal from a promotion list.
580.
Regular warrant officers twice failing of selection for promotion: involuntary retirement or separation.
580a.
Enhanced authority for selective early discharges.
581.
Selective retirement.
582.
Warrant officer active-duty list: exclusions.
583.
Definitions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1993**—Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, §504(b), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1645, added item 580a.

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1052(6), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2499, inserted "to be" after "Information" in item 576 and substituted "Promotions:" for "Promotions;" in item 578.
#### § 41.23 Can a Tribal college or university request a second eligibility study?

If a Tribe is not successful in its appeal under § 41.21, it can request another eligibility study 12 months or more after the date of the negative determination.