alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mikolajczyk *v.*Mikolajczyk.

[No. 12,147.

Filed April 22, 1925.

Rehearing denied June 12, 1925.

Transfer denied October 8, 1925.]

From Lake Superior Court; *Maumee E. Crites,*Judge.

Suit by Walter Mikolajczyk against Lucy Mikolajczyk. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. *Affirmed.*By the second division.

*D. P. Sevald*and *Fred Barnett,*for appellant.

Per Curiam.

Action by appellee for divorce on the grounds of adultery and cruel treatment, to which the appellant replied by general denial; she also filed a cross-complaint, charging cruel and inhuman treatment and nonsupport, in which she asked for a “limited divorce” for the period of three years; this cross-complaint was answered by a general denial. A trial resulted in a finding for the plaintiff on the issues tendered by his complaint, and a finding against the defendant on the issues tendered by her cross-complaint. From a decree granting a divorce to plaintiff, defendant has appealed and has assigned as error the action of the court in overruling her motion for a new trial.

The appellant first contends that the evidence shows both parties to have been guilty of marital wrongs and that therefore neither was entitled to a divorce. This contention, as to its *731validity, depends upon the credibility of the testimony given. If the court believed, as it evidently did, the testimony of appellee, and did not believe the testimony of appellant, the decree, so far as the above contention is concerned, was right.

It is next contended that the appellee was not entitled to a decree because, it is insisted, the offense of adultery was by him condoned. On oral argument, it was insisted that the appellee, while testifying as a witness, had admitted living with the appellant as his wife subsequent to the time of her committing the alleged offense, with full knowledge thereof. A careful reading of all the testimony fails to disclose any such testimony as. having been given by appellee. The appellant testified to such living together, but her credibility was for the trial court.

After a careful reading of all the testimony in this case, we are impressed that the decree of divorce in this case was fully justified.

Affirmed.
#### § 286.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part 286 is to prescribe the regulations and procedures under which non-reimbursable grants may be made to eligible applicants to stimulate and increase Indian entrepreneurship and employment through establishment, acquisition or expansion of profit-making Indian-owned economic enterprises which will contribute to the economy of a reservation.
### §15106. Failure of selection for promotion

(a) In General.—Except as provided in this section, sections 14501 through 14513 of this title shall apply to promotions of officers in competitive categories of officers designated for purposes of this chapter.

(b) Inapplicability of Failure of Selection for Promotion to Officers Above Promotion Zone.—The reference in section 14501 of this title to an officer above the promotion zone shall not apply in the promotion of officers described in subsection (a).

(c) Special Selection Board Matters.—The reference in section 14502(a)(1) of this title to a person above the promotion zone shall not apply in the promotion of officers described in subsection (a).

(d) Effect of Failure of Selection.—In the administration of this chapter pursuant to subsection (a)—

(1) an officer described in subsection (a) shall not be deemed to have failed twice of selection for promotion for purposes of section 14502(b) 1 of this title until the officer has failed selection of promotion to the next higher grade the maximum number of times specified for opportunities for promotion to such grade within the competitive category concerned pursuant to section 15104 of this title; and

(2) any reference in sections 14504 through 14506 of this title to an officer who has failed of selection for promotion to the next higher grade for the second time shall be deemed to refer instead to an officer described in subsection (a) who has failed of selection for promotion to the next higher grade for the maximum number of times specified for opportunities for promotion to such grade within the competitive category concerned pursuant to such section 15104.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §514(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 247.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 14502(b) of this title, referred to in subsec. (d)(1), probably should be section 14501(b) of this title, which relates to officers twice failed of selection. Section 14502(b) of this title relates to officers considered but not selected due to material error.

1 See References in Text note below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LIL MARC, INC.
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
              2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
              TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,387
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,387
<PP&E>                                          11,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,686
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,846
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,234)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
# C_2006243EN.01000402.xml

| 10.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4331 — Arcelor/Bamesa/Bamesa Otel)

(2006/C 243/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 8 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4331. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4331. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
### [§375. Renumbered §275]
# C_2006212EN.01002603.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/26

---

Action brought on 20 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-321/06)

(2006/C 212/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and G. Rozet, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community (1), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community (1), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of Directive 2002/14/EC into domestic law expired on 23 March 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 80, p. 29.

1

---
H. Res. 562

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 24, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution the

House shall be considered to have taken from the Speaker’s

table the bill (H.R. 1167) to amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to provide for further

self-governance by Indian tribes, and for other purposes, and

the Senate amendment thereto, and to have concurred in the

Senate amendment with the following amendments:

(1) Page 14, line 12, strike ‘‘(or of such other agency)’’.

(2) Page 15, line 1, insert ‘‘so’’ after ‘‘functions’’.

(3) Page 19, line 4, insert ‘‘other provisions of

law,’’ after ‘‘section 106’’.

(4) Page 20, line 6, strike ‘‘305’’ and insert ‘‘505’’.

(5) Page 31, line 23, strike ‘‘may’’ and insert ‘‘is

authorized to’’.

(6) Page 39, strike lines 7 through 14, and insert

the following:
2

•HRES 562 EH

‘‘(g) WAGES.—All laborers and mechanics employed by

contractors and subcontractors (excluding tribes and tribal

organizations) in the construction, alteration, or repair, including painting or decorating of a building or other facilities

in connection with construction projects funded by the United

States under this Act shall be paid wages at not less than

those prevailing wages on similar construction in the locality

as determined by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with

the Davis-Bacon Act of March 3, 1931 (46 Stat. 1494). With

respect to construction alteration, or repair work to which the

Act of March 3, 1931, is applicable under this section, the

Secretary of Labor shall have the authority and functions set

forth in the Reorganization Plan numbered 14, of 1950, and

section 2 of the Act of June 13, 1934 (48 Stat. 948).

(7) Page 39, strike line 24 and all that follows

through page 40, line 6, and insert the following:

‘‘Regarding construction programs or projects, the Secretary and Indian tribes may negotiate for the inclusion of

specific provisions of the Office of Federal Procurement and

Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) and Federal acquisition

regulations in any funding agreement entered into under this

part. Absent a negotiated agreement, such provisions and

regulatory requirements shall not apply.

(8) Page 41, line 1, insert a comma after ‘‘Executive orders’’.
3

•HRES 562 EH

(9) Page 49, strike lines 4 through 10.

(10) Page 56, beginning on line 21, strike ‘‘for fiscal years 2000 and 2001’’.

(11) Page 60, line 6, strike ‘‘(a) IN

GENERAL.—’’.

(12) Page 60, strike lines 9 and 10.

(13) Page 60, strike line 16 and all that follows

through page 65, line 16.

(14) Page 65, line 17, strike ‘‘SEC. 13.’’ and insert

‘‘SEC. 12.’’.

(15) Page 66, after line 7, insert the following:

SEC. 13. EFFECTIVE DATE.

Except as otherwise provided, the provisions of this Act

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mary Agnes Wilderotter, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Wink Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Report fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Wink Communications, Inc.


                                                By: /s/ MARY AGNES WILDEROTTER
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JUDY MCGRATH A/K/A JO ANN FONZONE,** 

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 103 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 10th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Al lowance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 52

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Standards of Official

Conduct in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself and Mr. BERMAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Standards of Official Conduct in the One Hundred Sixth

Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Standards of

4 Official Conduct (hereafter in this resolution referred to

5 as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries

8 and expenses, not more than $2,860,915 for the One Hun9 dred Sixth Congress.
2

•HRES 52 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $1,382,916 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1999, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 2000; and

7 (2) not more than $1,477,999 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 2000, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 2001.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2 to 2007 10-Q

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of Convergys Corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2007 (the
Report), I, Earl C. Shanks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Earl C. Shanks     
|Earl C. Shanks         
|Chief Financial Officer

August 7, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Convergys Corporation and will be retained by Convergys Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
§ 513.20 What debts can the Commission refer to Treasury for collection by administrative and tax refund offset? ( a ) The Commission may refer any past due, legally enforceable nonjudgment debt of a person to the Treasury for administrative and tax refund offset if the debt: ( 1 ) Has been delinquent for at least three months and will not have been delinquent more than 10 years at the time the offset is made;
( 2 ) Is at least $25.00 or another amount established by Treasury.
( b ) Debts reduced to judgment may be referred to Treasury for tax refund offset at any time.
#### § 31.4 Compulsory attendance.

Compulsory school attendance of Indian children is provided for by law.

(60 Stat. 962; [25 U.S.C. 231](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/25/231))

Cross Reference:

For penalties for the failure of Indians to send children to school and for contributing to the delinquency of minors, see [§ 11.424 of this chapter](/on/2024-03-22/title-25/section-11.424).
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table For 2023 Valuation Dates 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table for 2023 Valuation Dates

This mortality table is used to determine the present value of annuities in involuntary terminations and distress terminations of single-employer plans, as discussed in 29 CFR 4044. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

 

November 18, 2022

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
### Stratigraphy and geologic history of the Amsden Formation (Mississippian and Pennsylvanian) of Wyoming

By: William Jasper SandoMackenzie Gordon Jr.J. Thomas Dutro Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp848A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **8**                            (8028 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### Carboniferous microfacies, microfossils, and corals, Lisburne Group, Arctic Alaska

By: Augustus K. ArmstrongBernard L. Mamet

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp849

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.