alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006165EN.01003401.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/34

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 31 May 2006 — Frankin and Others v Commission

(Case F-91/05) (1)

1

(Pension - Transfer of pension rights acquired in Belgium - Dismissal of the applicants' requests for assistance)

(2006/C 165/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Frankin and Others (Sorée, Belgium) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the implicit refusal by the Commission to offer the applicants its assistance pursuant to Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and, second, damages for losses the applicants claim to have suffered as a result of that refusal.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | The parties are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315 of 10.12.2005 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under Case T-359/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005)

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Normas y Regulaciones 
-  Cómo La Fecha de Bancarrota Puede Afectar Sus Beneficios 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov’s English home page for more information available in English.

# Cómo la Fecha de Bancarrota Puede Afectar sus Beneficios

Hay muchas maneras en que la fecha de bancarrota puede afectar sus beneficios.

Por ejemplo, en el supuesto caso de que un empleado de la Empresa X tiene 20 años de servicio al 1 de julio de 2009, cuando la empresa X presenta bancarrota. El 1 de julio de 2009 es la fecha de presentación de bancarrota. Supongamos, además que el plan termina el 1 de julio de 2011, al momento en el que el empleado ha cumplido 22 años de servicio.

En este ejemplo, PBGC no garantizaría los beneficios del empleado obtenidos después del 1 de julio de 2009. Estos beneficios de pensión ganados después de la fecha de presentación de bancarrota son "beneficios no garantizados" que, generalmente, son pagaderos a los participantes en el plan, solo si su plan tiene bienes en el plan suficientes para ellos. Por lo tanto, en este ejemplo, PBGC garantizará un beneficio de pensión basado únicamente en los primeros 20 años de servicio del empleado (y no el total de 22 años). Esta limitación también se aplica a su salario o cualquier otro factor que cambie entre la fecha de presentación de bancarrota y la fecha que su plan termina, si su plan los utiliza para determinar su beneficio.

La fecha de presentación de bancarrota, no la fecha en que termina su plan, también se convierte en la base para aplicar las limitaciones legales en su beneficio de pensión garantizada. En el ejemplo anterior, la máxima limitación de seguro se basaría en los niveles de 2009, no en los niveles de 2011, porque el patrocinador del plan presentó su bancarrota en el 2009. Además, la introducción progresiva (enlance a la deficición de introducción progresiva) se calcularía utilizando la fecha de presentación de bancarrota, no la fecha en que termina el plan.

Por último, la fecha de presentación de bancarrota, no la fecha que su plan termina, es la fecha que utiliza PBGC para determinar quién es elegible para recibir un beneficio en la Categoría de Prioridad 3 (página en inglés) y la cantidad de ese beneficio. Esto significa que su beneficio PC3 será el beneficio del plan, pagadero tres años antes de la fecha de presentación de bancarrota y basado, generalmente, en las disposiciones del plan en vigor cinco años antes de la fecha de presentación de bancarrota. Puede encontrar más información en la página de categorías de prioridad.

 

Marzo 2, 2021

Déjenos sus comentarios
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101-3140

OFFICE OF 

AIR, WASTE AND TOXICS 

 

March 21, 2012 

Subject: Q/d Analysis of BART Sources in Idaho, Oregon and Washington to Establish A 

Threshold for Estimating Visibility Impacts from non-BART Sources 

From: Keith Rose, Environmental Scientist 

To: File 

Using information in EPA’s National Emission Inventory Database, specifically the total annual 

emission rates (Q), and distance in kilometers (d) to the nearest Class I area, I compared the 

visibility impairment in deciviews (dv) determined by CALPUFF modeling for 19 BART 

sources in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington to the Q/d values for these sources. The results, 

shown in the attached spreadsheet, show that all BART sources with a Q/d values of less than 

26.2 dv had a visibility impact of less than 0.5 dv, with an average impact of 0.32 dv. EPA has 

conservatively interpreted these results as indicating that non-BART sources in the region with 

Q/d values of less than 20, would likely have visibility impacts less than 0.5 dv in the nearest 

Class I area.
# C_2014033EN.01001001.xml

| 5.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/10

---

Notice concerning a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC — Extension of deadline

Request from a contracting entity

2014/C 33/07

On 21 November 2013, the Commission received a request under Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1).

1

The request from Magyar Posta Zrt. concerns certain postal services carried out in Hungary. The request was the subject of a notice published on p. 9 of OJ C 382 on 31 December 2013. The initial deadline was 24 February 2014.

Given that the Commission needs to obtain and analyse additional information, and in accordance with the second sentence of Article 30(6), the period granted to the Commission for deciding on this request is hereby extended by three months.

The final deadline is now 26 May 2014.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 392 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 392

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding National 
                     Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 1999

 Mr. Weller submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding National 
                     Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.

Whereas on December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy and Air Force attacked 
        units of the Armed Forces of the United States stationed at Pearl 
        Harbor, Hawaii;
Whereas 2,403 members of the Armed Forces of the United States were killed in 
        the attack on Pearl Harbor;
Whereas there are currently more than 12,000 members of the Pearl Harbor 
        Survivors Association;
Whereas the 60th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor will be December 7, 
        2001;
Whereas on August 23, 1994, Public Law 103-308 was enacted, designating December 
        7 of each year as National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day;
Whereas Public Law 103-308, reenacted as section 129 of title 36, United States 
        Code, requests the President to issue each year a proclamation calling 
        on the people of the United States to observe National Pearl Harbor 
        Remembrance Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities, and all 
        departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the Federal Government, 
        and interested organizations, groups, and individuals, to fly the flag 
        of the United States at half-staff each December 7 in honor of the 
        individuals who died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor;
Whereas many citizens remain unaware of National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day; 
        and
Whereas many Federal offices do not lower their flags to half-staff each 
        December 7: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) pays tribute to the citizens of the United States who 
        died in the attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on December 7, 
        1941, and the members of the Pearl Harbor Survivors 
        Association; and
            (2) urges the President to take more active steps--
                    (A) to inform the American public of the existence 
                of National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day; and
                    (B) to ensure that the flag of the United States is 
                flown at half-staff in accordance with section 129 of 
                title 36, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
155 So.2d 128

#### DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS and Ala. Dry Dock & S. Co. v. Richard John HEADON.

1 Div. 156.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 27, 1963.

J. Eugene Foster, Montgomery, and W. C. Boone, Jr., Mobile, for petitioners.

Kilborn, Darby & Kilborn, Mobile, opposed.

GOODWYN, Justice.

Petition of the Department of Industrial Relations and Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Dept. of Ind. Rel. et al. v. Headon, Ala.App., 155 So.2d 123.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.
#### §§ 286.13-286.14 [Reserved]
#### William M. Foley, Adm., etc., v. Suburban Ry. Co.

1. *Pleading*— Effect *of a Failure to Allege that a Deceased Person Left Next of Kin.*— Where a declaration, as originally filed, in an action for damages sustained by the death of a person from negligence, fails to allege that the deceased left a widow or next of kin surviving him, it fails to state a cause of action, and an amendment filed more than two years after the cause of action arose, which alleges that he did leave surviving him a widow and children, is barred by the statute of limitations.

Trespass on the Case. — Death from negligent act. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edmund W. Burke, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1901.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 7, 1901.

Frank H. Novak, attorney for appellant.

Clarence A. Knight and William G-. Adams, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit by appellee against appellant for alleged negligence causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate. The suit was commenced July 25, 1899, and the declaration was *109filed August 8, 1899. It is averred in the declaration, and is conceded by counsel for appellant, that the accident which resulted in the death of appellant’s intestate, occurred July 27, 1897. The original declaration, filed August 8, 1899, contained no averment of the survival of any kin of appellant’s intestate. January 2, 1901, appellant, by leave of the court, filed an amendment to the declaration, alleging the survival of certain persons, naming them, and that they were the heirs and next of kin of appellant’s intestate.

To the declaration, as amended, a plea of the statute, limiting such actions to two years after the cause of action accrues, was pleaded, to which plea appellant filed a demurrer, which the court overruled, sustained the plea, and rendered judgment for appellee. Foster v. St. Luke’s Hospital, 191 111. 94, is decisive that the demurrer was properly overruled and the plea sustained.

The judgment will be affirmed.
### §8302. Regulations

The President may prescribe regulations for the administration of the preceding sections of this chapter.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 391, §6252; renumbered §8302, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(13), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6252 | 34 U.S.C. 364 (10th, and last 47 words). | Feb. 4, 1919, ch. 14, §9 (as applicable to regulations), 40 Stat. 1057; renumbered §11 and amended Aug. 7, 1942, ch. 551, §1, 56 Stat. 745. |
| | 34 U.S.C. 364a (1st 9 words of 1st sentence). | July 2, 1926, ch. 721, §12 (1st 9 words of 1st sentence), 44 Stat. 789; July 30, 1937, ch. 545, §4, 50 Stat. 549. |

The words "further", "from time to time any and all rules", "orders which he shall deem necessary", and "to execute full purpose and intention thereof" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8302, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 513, related to promotion to captain, major, or lieutenant colonel of commissioned medical, dental, or veterinary officers in Regular Air Force upon examination of professional fitness and effect upon failure of promotion, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §204, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2880, effective Sept. 15, 1981. See sections 631 and 632 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6252 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2006190EN.01003302.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/33

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2006 — Grünheid v Commission

(Case F-101/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Time-limit for complaint - Pay slip - Admissibility - Appointment - Classification in the higher career grad e - Articles 25, 26 and 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)

(2006/C 190/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sabine Grünheid (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: Ch. Berardis-Kayser and K. Herrmann, Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 6 October 2004 by which the Commission established the applicant in her post as an official, inasmuch as that decision incorporates a classification of grade A*8, and the decision of 6 July 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 10 of 14.01.2006 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-388/05 and transferred to the European Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
#### § 243.3 Delegation of authority.

The Secretary of the Interior has delegated authority under the Act through the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs to the Alaska Regional Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. All claims of ownership of reindeer in Alaska, as required by the Act (section 500b), must be filed with the Regional Director or the Director's designee.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Hart, the President (Principal Executive Officer) of Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 27, 2015/s/ Michael HartMichael Hart
President (Principal
Executive Officer)




|* | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2013357EN.01001201.xml

| 6.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/12

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 357/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 20.11.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 20.11.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or group of stocks | RED/N3LN. |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | NAFO 3LN |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 70/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

20.11.2013

Duration

20.11.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Portugal

Stock or group of stocks

RED/N3LN.

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Sebastes

Zone

NAFO 3LN

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

70/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

                    OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Public Hearing in Conjunction with each Board meeting was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (Volume 76, Number 22, Pages 5842 and 5843) on February 2, 2011. No requests were received to provide testimony or submit written statements for the record; therefore, OPIC's public hearing scheduled for 2 PM, February 24, 2011 in conjunction with OPIC's March 10, 2011 Board of Directors meeting has been cancelled.                

*Contact Person for Information:*                     Information on the hearing cancellation may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, or via e-mail at                     *Connie.Downs@opic.gov.*

Dated: February 17, 2011.

Connie M. Downs,

OPIC Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-4103 Filed 2-18-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Guidance Document Database 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Guidance Document Database

The documents listed below are PBGC’s guidance documents. The contents of these documents do not have the force and effect of law, unless expressly authorized by statute or incorporated into a contract, and are not meant to bind the public in any way. These documents are intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.

 If you would like to comment on an existing guidance document, please submit your comment, including your contact information, to the General Counsel at  GuidanceComments@pbgc.gov or at Regulatory Affairs Division, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Office of the General Counsel, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20024-2101.

-    First  
-    Previous  
-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 153 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 29, 1999.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 5.

    Section 2(f)(1) of House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, agreed to 
January 6, 1999 (as amended by House Resolution 129, One Hundred Sixth Congress, 
agreed to March 24, 1999), is amended by striking ``April 30, 1999'' and 
inserting ``May 14, 1999''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```