alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11.1

        24/7 MEDIA, INC.

CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
          (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     Three Months Ended June 30, 1999  Six Months Ended June 30, 1999,
                                     --------------------------------  -------------------------------
                                           1999            1998              1999            1998
                                     --------------    --------------  --------------    -------------
<S>                                    <C>             <C>               <C>             <C>
Net Loss                               $ (7,163,000)   $ (9,961,000)     $(14,407,000)   $(12,373,000)
                                       ------------    ------------      ------------    ------------

Cumulative Dividends on Mandatorily
     Convertible Preferred Stock                 --        (152,000)               --        (186,000)
                                       ------------    ------------      ------------    ------------

Net Loss Attributable to Common
     Stockholders                      $ (7,163,000)   $(10,113,000)     $(14,407,000)   $(12,559,000)
                                       ============    ============      ============    ============

Total weighted average
     common shares outstanding           19,360,778       8,607,872        18,053,643       6,217,004
                                       ============    ============      ============    ============

Basic and diluted net loss per share   $      (0.37)   $      (1.17)     $      (0.80)   $      (2.02)
                                       ============    ============      ============    ============
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 911 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.911

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 310 New Bern Avenue in 
   Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ``Terry Sanford Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 310 New Bern Avenue in Raleigh, 
North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ``Terry Sanford 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Terry Sanford 
Federal Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Corps Archeologist Leads Expedition to Recover a Vietnam War-era Pilot's Remains 

By Randy J. Gon (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More New/Articles
Order entered August 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00954-CV

IN RE SONJA Y. WEBSTER, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-10-866-2

ORDER

Before Justices Francis, Myers and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of APT Systems, Inc. (the "Company) for the year ended January 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glenda Dowie, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: June 5, 2015/s/ Glenda DowieGlenda DowieChief Executive Officer
### §7279. Distinguished flying cross: award; limitations

(a) The President may award a distinguished flying cross of appropriate design with accompanying ribbon to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguishes himself by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in an aerial flight.

(b) Not more than one distinguished flying cross may be awarded to a person. However, for each succeeding act that would otherwise justify the award of such a cross, the President may award a suitable bar or other device to be worn as he directs.

(c) No distinguished flying cross, or device in place thereof, may be awarded or presented to a person whose service after he distinguished himself has not been honorable.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 217, §3749; renumbered §7279, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(11), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3749(a) 3749(b)3749(c) | 10:1429 (less 2d and last sentences).10:1429 (2d sentence).10:1429 (last sentence, less 1st 49 words). | July 2, 1926, ch. 721, §12 (less 1st 49 words of last sentence), 44 Stat. 789; July 30, 1937, §4, 50 Stat. 549. |

3749(b)

3749(c)

10:1429 (2d sentence).

10:1429 (last sentence, less 1st 49 words).

Although 10:1429 refers to persons serving "with the Air Corps of the Army", and the functions of the Army Air Corps have been transferred to the Air Force under section 208(b) of the National Security Act of 1947 (5 U.S.C. 626c(b)), members of the Army continue to participate in aerial flights and are eligible for the award of the distinguished flying cross.

In subsection (a), the words "Under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe" are omitted, since the President has inherent authority to issue regulations appropriate to exercising his functions. The words "but not in the name of Congress" are omitted as surplusage, since a medal is presented in the name of Congress only if the law so directs. The word "award" is substituted for the word "present" to cover the determination of the recipients as well as the actual presentation of the medal. The words "since the 6th day of April, 1917, has distinguished, or who, after July 2, 1926" and 10:1429 (proviso of 1st sentence) are omitted as executed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3749 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 166.403 Will the BIA ever grant or approve a permit at less than fair annual rental? ( a ) We will grant a permit for grazing on individually-owned Indian land at less than fair annual rental if, after competitive bidding of the permit, we determine that such action would be in the best interests of the individual Indian landowners.
( b ) We may approve a permit for grazing on individually-owned Indian land at less than fair annual rental if: ( 1 ) The permit is for the Indian landowner's immediate family or co-owner; or
( 2 ) We determine it is in the best interest of the Indian landowners.
( c ) We may approve a permit for grazing on tribal land at less than fair annual rental if the tribe sets the rate.
### §7749. Property: for United States surveys

Under regulations governing the transportation of Army supplies, any branch, office, or officer designated by the Secretary of the Army shall receive, transport, and be responsible for property turned over by the officers or agents of any United States survey, for the National Museum or for a department of the United States or field office thereof. The amount paid by the Army for transportation under this section shall be refunded to the Army by the National Museum or the department to which the property is consigned.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 268, §4749; renumbered §7749, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4749 | 10:1377. | July 5, 1884, ch. 217 (9th proviso under "Quartermaster's Department"), 23 Stat. 111; June 28, 1950, ch. 383, §402(b), 64 Stat. 272. |

The words "a department of the United States or a field office thereof" are substituted for the words "the civil or naval departments of the Government, in Washington or elsewhere". The words "National Museum or the department to which the property is consigned" are substituted for the words "bureau to which such property or stores pertain". The words "United States" are substituted for the word "Government". The words "wherever stationed" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4749 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Unmanned Aircraft and the National Airspace System Presented by the Air Safety Institute 

### Tomas Cavallaro Pilot Certificate FA3CF9CLF7 AOPA Member 09882272 July 15, 2016
### §8451a. Superintendent

(a) There is a Superintendent of the United States Naval Academy. The immediate governance of the Naval Academy is under the Superintendent.

(b) The Superintendent shall be detailed to that position by the President. As a condition for detail to that position, an officer shall acknowledge that upon termination of that detail the officer shall be retired pursuant to section 8371(a) of this title, unless such retirement is waived under section 8371(b) of this title.

(c) An officer who is detailed to the position of Superintendent shall be so detailed for a period of not less than three years. In any case in which an officer serving as Superintendent is reassigned or retires before having completed three years service as Superintendent, or otherwise leaves that position (other than due to death) without having completed three years service in that position, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to Congress notice that such officer left the position of Superintendent without having completed three years service in that position, together with a statement of the reasons why that officer did not complete three years service in that position.

(Added Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §532(a)(2)(B), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 603, §6951a; amended Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §541(b)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1903; renumbered §8451a and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§807(c)(1), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836, 1840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §807(c)(1), renumbered section 6951a of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 8371(a)" for "section 6371(a)" and "section 8371(b)" for "section 6371(b)".

2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–375, §541(b)(2)(A), inserted before period at end "pursuant to section 6371(a) of this title, unless such retirement is waived under section 6371(b) of this title".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–375, §541(b)(2)(B), added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Application of Section to Superintendents Serving on October 5, 1999

Section not applicable to an officer serving on Oct. 5, 1999, in the position of Superintendent of the United States Military Academy, Naval Academy, or Air Force Academy for so long as that officer continues on and after that date to serve in that position without a break in service, see section 532(a)(5) of Pub. L. 106–65, set out as a note under section 7321 of this title.
### [§2383. Renumbered §4508]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2383, added Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VIII, §805(a)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2010; amended Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title X, §1061(a)(13), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1473; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2401, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3324, related to quality control in procurement of critical aircraft and ship spare or repair parts, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title VIII, §803(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 390.

Another prior section 2383, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 137, permitted Secretary of a military department to make emergency purchases of war material abroad, and provided that such material may be admitted free of duty, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 87–456, title III, §303(c), May 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 78.
§ 276.13 Indian preference in grant administration. Any grant or subgrant shall require that to the greatest extent feasible: ( a ) Preferences and opportunities for training and employment in connection with the administration of such a grant or subgrant shall be given to Indians.
( b ) Preference in the award of a subgrant, contract or subcontract in connection with administration of a grant shall be given to Indian organizations and economic enterprises.
( c ) A tribal governing body may develop its own Indian preference requirements to the extent that such requirements are not inconsistent with the purpose and intent of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section for grants executed under this part.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—COMMODITY BROKER LIQUIDATION
#### Douglas Mark Jaehn, Respondent, v Lahr Construction Corp., Doing Business as LeCesse Construction Company, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Lahr Construction Corp., Doing Business as LeCesse Construction Company, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v Gregory J. Young et al., Doing Business as Peterson-Young, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[824 NYS2d 541]

Appeals from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered November 23, 2005 in a personal injury action. The amended order, among other things, granted those parts of plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) against defendants Lahr Construction Corp., doing business as LeCesse Construction Company, Winchester Construction Corp., Cloverwood Senior Living, Inc., and Rochester Friendly Senior Services.

It is hereby ordered that the amended order so appealed from be and the same hereby is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries he sustained when he fell while working on a construction project. Plaintiff and his supervisor had detached a prefabricated interior staircase from the building and were repositioning it. While plaintiff was holding its upper end, the staircase abruptly fell into the stairwell and plaintiff fell on top of it, sustaining injuries. Lahr Construction Corp., doing business as LeCesse Construction Company, Winchester Construction Corp., Cloverwood Senior Living, Inc., and Rochester Friendly Senior Services (defendants) and third-party defendants appeal from an amended order that, inter alia, granted those parts of plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment *1192on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) against those defendants.

Supreme Court properly granted those parts of plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment. A “work site is ‘elevated’ within the meaning of [Labor Law § 240 (1)] where the required work itself must be performed at an elevation, i.e., at the upper elevation differential, such that one of the devices enumerated in the statute will safely allow the worker to perform the task” *(Ames v Norstar Bldg. Corp.,*19 AD3d 1016, 1017 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, defendants were required to utilize one or more of the safety devices enumerated in the statute “because of a difference between the elevation level of the required work and a lower level” *(Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co.,*78 NY2d 509, 514 [1991]). Having failed to provide any safety device, defendants are liable for the injuries that resulted from that failure *(see Partridge v Waterloo Cent. School Dist.,*12 AD3d 1054, 1055 [2004]).

All concur, Kehoe, J., not participating. Present—Scudder, J.P, Kehoe, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.
Description of 2007 Cash Bonus
  Amount ofName
    
    Position
    
    BonusThomas F. Darden
    
    Chairman of the Board
    
    $110,000Glenn Darden
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    $110,000Jeff Cook
    
    Executive Vice President  Operations
    
    $  50,000Philip W. Cook
    
    Senior Vice President 
Chief Financial Officer
    
    $  70,000John C. Cirone
    
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
    
    $  50,000William S. Buckler
    
    Vice President  U.S. Operations
    
    $  50,000
Exhibit 10.2


 


Amendment
to Technology Transfer Agreement


 


This Amendment to Technology Transfer Agreement
(this “Amendment”) between Qualigen, Inc. (“Qualigen”), a legal entity incorporated in
Delaware, USA, with its offices at 2042 Corte del Nogal, Suite B, Carlsbad, California 92011, USA; and Yi Xin Zhen Duan Jishu
(Suzhou) Ltd. (翊新诊断技术(苏州)有限公司)
(“Licensee”), a legal entity registered in Room 301, 302, Building 9, No. 188 Fu Chung Jiang Lu, Suzhou High
Technology Zone,
Suzhou,(中国苏州富春江路188号9号楼301,302室),
the People’s Republic of China (individually “Party” and together “Parties”), is
effective as of August 5, 2021. This Amendment amends the Technology Transfer Agreement between Qualigen and Licensee dated as of
October 7, 2020 (the “Agreement”).


 


The Parties agree as follows:


 


	 	1.	Section 2.14 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in full as follows:


“Sekisui Termination Date” means
March 31, 2022.


	 	2.	Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement remains unchanged in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party hereto has caused
this Amendment to Technology Transfer Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized representative at the date first set forth above.


 


	Qualigen, Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Michael. S. Poirier	 
	Name:	Michael S. Poirier	 
	Title:	President & CEO	 
	 	 	 
	Yi Xin Zhen Duan Jishu (Suzhou) Ltd. (翊新诊断技术(苏州)有限公司)
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Peng Zhou                      	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:
#### § 172.1 Acreage designated.

Pursuant to the provisions of the act of March 13, 1928 (45 Stat. 312) the contract executed between the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District of New Mexico and the United States under date of December 14, 1928, the official plan approved pursuant thereto, as modified, and the terms of section 24 of a contract between said parties dated September 4, 1936, dealing among other things with the payment of operation and maintenance and betterment assessments by the United States to the District, and section 24 of a similar contract dated April 8, 1938 executed by the representative of the United States, on this date, it is found that a total of 20,242.05 acres of Pueblo Indian lands of the Pueblos of Cochiti, Santo Domingo, San Felipe, Santa Ana, Sandia and Isleta is susceptible of economic irrigation and cultivation and is materially benefited by the works constructed by said District. This acreage is designated as follows:

Lands with recognized water rights not subject to operation and maintenance or betterment charges by the District and designated as “now irrigated”—8,847

Lands classified as “newly reclaimed” lands (exclusive of the purchased area)—11,074.4

Lands classified as newly reclaimed lands (the area recently purchased)—320.65

Total irrigable area materially benefited—20,242.05

[22 FR 10641, Dec. 24, 1957. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
H. Res. 554

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 19, 2000.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 4576) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2001, and for other purposes. All points of order against the

conference report and against its consideration are waived.

The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2006224EN.01002501.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 14 July 2006 — F.T.S. International BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West

(Case C-310/06)

(2006/C 224/46)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof te Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: F.T.S. International BV,

Applicant:

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West

Defendant:

Question referred

Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 1223/2002 (1) of 8 July 2002 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature valid?

1

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1223/2002 of 8 July 2002 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2002 L 179, p.8).

1

---