alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006261EN.01002301.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/23

---

Action brought on 26 August 2006 — Casa Editorial El Tiempo v OHIM –Instituto Nacional de Meteorología (EL TIEMPO)

(Case T-233/06)

(2006/C 261/43)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Casa Editorial El Tiempo SA (Bogotá, Colombia) (represented by: A. Fernández Lerroux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Instituto Nacional de Meteorología

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 June 2006 in Case R-760/2005-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 June 2006 in Case R-760/2005-4;

| — | order the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Casa Editorial El Tiempo SA

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark EL TIEMPO (application No 1685056) for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 38 and 41

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Instituto Nacional de Meteorología

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word marks EL TIEMPO for publications (unregistered, but well-known), TELETIEMPO for goods in Class 16 (No 1902923) and services in Class 38 (No 2217494, and TELETIEMPO INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE METEOROLOGÍA for services in Classes 35 (No 2217493) and 41 (No 2217492)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld and refusal of the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejection of the opposition in respect of the following services: ‘advertising; business management; business administration; office functions’ (Class 35) and ‘entertainment; sporting and cultural activities’ (Class 41)

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 20.705 Can an applicant or recipient appeal a tribal decision?

Yes, the applicant or recipient must pursue the appeal process applicable to the Public Law 93-638 contract, Public Law 102-477 grant, or Public Law 103-413 self-governance annual funding agreement. If no appeal process exists, then the applicant or recipient must pursue the appeal through the appropriate tribal forum.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING

FUNCTION OF THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES

OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kim Taylor, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of Huntington Auto Trust 2012-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas.



|                     |  |                                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|By:                  |  | /s/ Kim Taylor                                                  
|Name:                |  | Kim Taylor                                                      
|Title:               |  | Senior Vice President, The Huntington National Bank, as Servicer
|                    
|Date: March 25, 2014
EXHIBIT 32. - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-Canadian
Oil Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Bernard Lipton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


Dated: May 9, 2007             /s/ Andre Sakhai
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Andre Sakhai, President & Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 9, 2007             /s/ Bernard Lipton
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Bernard Lipton, Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
6H 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0363

LINO MANCEBO,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

THE LONE MOUNTAIN RANCH, INC.,

 Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Margot Barg Ogburn, whose name appears next on the 

list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which 

is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this July 24, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: John C. Heenan, Philip Bradford Condra, Rachel Hendershot Parkin, Margot Barg 

Ogburn

07/24/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0363
### [§§130j, 130k. Renumbered §§395, 396]
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 410

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 2000

Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee

3 of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Goode of Vir5 ginia.

Æ
·. 

~ 

. PBGC. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

Protecting America's Pensions t 200 KStreet. N.W .. Washington. D.C. 20005-4026 

June 11. 2010 

Re: I Case 202057, Horizon NR, LLC Employee Pension 

Plan (the "Horizon Plan") 

Dearl ~--~ 

We are responding to your appeal of PBGC's March 27, 2009 determination of 

your benefit under the Horizon Plan. As we explain below, PBGC will issue you a 

eorrected determination letter with a new 45-day right of appeal. 

-PBGC's March 27, 2009 determination letter told you that you were entitled to a 

final monthly PBGC benefit of $169.47 instead of the $371.43 you are currently 

receiving. The letter did not explain the reason for the difference in the two amounts. 

In your May 4, 2009 letter to the Appeals Board, you said that you have been 

receiving Social Security Disability benefits since 1989. Although your appeal letter 

suggested that you thought PBGC had reduced your benefit due to the Maximum 

Guaranteed Benefit ("MGB") limit, it is clear that your Horizon Plan benefit was not large 

enough. to be affected by that limit. . 

After further review, however, PBGC's Benefits Administration and Payment 

Department ("BAPD" also known as the Insurance Operations Department), the 

department that issued your March 27, 2009 determination letter, has decided to send 

you a corrected determination letter. 

As BAPD will send you a corrected determination letter with a new 45-day right of 

appeal, we are closing your current appeal. . 

Sincerely, 

Michel Louis 

Appeals Board Member
### §7838. Settlement of accounts: affidavit of company commander

In the settlement of the accounts of the commanding officer of a company for clothing and other military supplies, his affidavit may be received to show—

(1) that vouchers or company books were lost;

(2) anything tending to prove that any apparent deficiency of those articles was caused by unavoidable accident, or by loss in actual service without his fault; or

(3) that all or part of the clothing and supplies was properly used.

The affidavit may be used as evidence of the facts set forth, with or without other evidence, as determined by the Secretary of the Army to be just and proper under the circumstances.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 274, §4838; renumbered §7838, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4838 | 10:1302. | R.S. 225 (less 1st sentence); added Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69 (3d par.), 19 Stat. 241. |

The word "anything" is substituted for the words "any matter or circumstance". The words "properly used" are substituted for the words "legally used and appropriated". The words "of the case" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4838 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
ÓN DE BOMBEROS

123

125

SCHOOL BUS

SCHOOL BUS

Incendios forestales: Protéjase a 

sí mismo y a la Comunidad

Preparación de la Comunidad

Trabaje con sus vecinos para proteger a su comunidad de los incendios 

forestales con las siguientes recomendaciones de preparación:

125

Siga las 

instrucciones de

evacuación indicadas 

por las autoridades 

de emergencia local.

Realice reuniones con 

la comunidad y 

trabajen con los 

vecinos para preparar

al vecindario de los

incendios forestales.

Practiquen dos formas de

salir del vecindario. Estarán 

preparados si las carreteras

se encuentran bloqueadas.

Asegúrense de que todas 

las casas y las entradas

tengan los números bien

marcados y que puedan

verse desde las calles.

Reúnase con el departamento

de bomberos local. Consulte con 

el personal del departamento

para que los 

preparen para

incendios 

forestales.

Siempre manténgase al tanto de su entorno, y cuando se le pida que deje a sus oficiales de emergencias locales, por favor hágalo.

¡Un retraso podría costar tu vida!

Visite el Juego de herramientas de la interfaz urbana de Wildland (WUI) en www.usfa.fema.gov/WUI_toolkit, que está diseñado para ayudar

a los departamentos de bomberos a prepararse para, responder y educarse a sí mismos y a sus comunidades sobre los riesgos de incendios forestales.

Para obtener más información, visite www.usfa.fema.gov/prevention/outreach/wildfire.html.

FA-337 / Octubre 2017
100 pies

Documentos importantes Documentos importantes

1

Incendios forestales: Protéjase a 

sí mismo y a la Comunidad 

Responsabilidad Personal

Puede proteger a su familia y su hogar de incendios forestales, 

siguiendo estas recomendaciones de seguridad:

Prepare un plan de evacuación

y practíquelo. El plan debe

incluir puntos de encuentro, un

plan de comunicación y el

hospedaje de las mascotas.

Utilice edificios o 

materiales de jardín

que no se quemen

fácilmente.

Mantenga un área

limpia y verde de hasta 

100 pies de distancia 

alrededor de su hogar.

Prepare un bolso de

emergencia con sus 

elementos personales

que podría necesitar 

si se le pide evacuar 

su hogar.

Limpie las hojas secas y las de

pino del techo, las canaletas y 

la terraza a menudo.

Abandone su hogar 

cuando se lo soliciten.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Speeches / Testimony

# Readout of Admiral Harry B. Harris Jr., Commander, U.S. Pacific Command Meeting With Japanese Minister of Defense  Gen Nakatani at Camp Smith, Hawaii

By PACOM Chief of Operations and Media, U.S. Army Major Dave EastburnU.S. Pacific Command, Public Affairs Office

Today, Admiral Harry B. Harris Jr., Commander, United States Pacific Command, met with Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani at Camp Smith, Hawaii, in the Defense Minister’s second visit to U.S. PACOM headquarters in his current role. 

In the meeting, the Adm. Harris and Minister Nakatani discussed the continually evolving security environment in the Indo-Asia-Pacific, including the East China Sea and the South China Sea.  They discussed issues relevant to both countries and affirmed their determination to conduct maritime operations in accordance with international law. 

The two also discussed the current Ballistic Missile Defense posture in the Indo-Asia-Pacific and how the two nations partner to enhance BMD coverage of mutual interests.  

Adm. Harris and Minister Nakatani expressed their commitment to a strong alliance and to continuing to build on the relationship in the future.

*IMMEDIATE RELEASE*

  November 24, 2015**                    SHARE                **                    PRINT                Indo-Asia-PacificMinister NakataniADMIRAL HARRIS
# C_2006224EN.01004002.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/40

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 July 2006 — Endesa v Commission

(Case T-417/05) (1)

1

(Competition - Concentration - Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Electricity market - Decision declaring that a concentration has no Community dimension - Calculation of turnover - Accounting criteria - Adjustments - Burden of proof - Rights of the defence)

(2006/C 224/87)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Endesa SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Flynn QC, S. Baxter, Solicitor, and M. Odriozola Alén, M. Muñoz de Juan, M. Merola, J. García de Enterría Lorenzo-Velázquez, J. Varcárcel Martínez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, É. Gippini Fournier, A. Whelan and M. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, abogado del Estado) and Gas Natural SDG SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: F. González Díaz, J. Jiménez de la Iglesia and A. Leis García, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission Decision of 15 November 2005 declaring that a concentration has no Community dimension (Case COMP/M.3986 — Gas Natural/Endesa)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and the costs of the Commission and Gas Natural SDG SA, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and the costs of the Commission and Gas Natural SDG SA, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22 of 28.1.2006.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quicksilver Resources Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/  Philip CookPhilip CookSenior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 465 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 11, 2000.
Whereas April is Child Abuse Prevention Month, which provides Congress the 
        opportunity to focus attention and raise awareness of the problem of 
        newborn babies abandoned in public places;
Whereas the Department of Health and Human Services reports that, in 1998, 
        31,000 babies were delivered and abandoned in hospitals by mothers;
Whereas an unknown number of newborn babies are abandoned in dumpsters, trash 
        bins, alleys, warehouses, and bathrooms;
Whereas the Department of Health and Human Services conducted an informal survey 
        of major newspapers and found that, in 1998, 105 babies were found 
        abandoned in public places in the United States, of which 33 were found 
        dead, and that, in 1991, 65 babies were abandoned, of which 8 were found 
        dead;
Whereas national statistics on the number of infants abandoned in public places 
        are not kept, though States are required to submit data to the 
        Department of Health and Human Services on the number of children who 
        enter foster care as a result of abandonment in general;
Whereas Texas is the only State to have enacted a law designed to address this 
        social problem, though 24 other States are considering such legislation, 
        including Alabama, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, 
        Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North 
        Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Connecticut, Oregon, 
        Illinois, Ohio, Wisconsin, Mississippi, Michigan, and New Mexico; and
Whereas there are innovative model programs in Houston, Mobile, Minneapolis, and 
        Syracuse that protect mothers who take newborns to hospitals or some 
        other safe haven rather than dumping them in a trash bin or leaving them 
        on a doorstep: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That local, State, and Federal statistics should be kept on the 
number of babies abandoned in public places.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```