alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §771a. Disposition on discharge

(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), when an enlisted member of an armed force is discharged, the exterior articles of uniform in his possession that were issued to him, other than those that he may wear from the place of discharge to his home under section 772(d) of this title, shall be retained for military use.

(b) When an enlisted member of an armed force is discharged for bad conduct, undesirability, unsuitability, inaptitude, or otherwise than honorably—

(1) the exterior articles of uniform in his possession shall be retained for military use;

(2) under such regulations as the Secretary concerned prescribes, a suit of civilian clothing and an overcoat when necessary, both to cost not more than $30, may be issued to him; and

(3) if he would be otherwise without funds to meet his immediate needs, he may be paid an amount, fixed by the Secretary concerned, of not more than $25.

(c) When an enlisted member of the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard who has been called into Federal service is released from that service, the exterior articles of uniform in his possession shall be accounted for as property issued to the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard, as the case may be, of the State or territory, Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia of whose Army National Guard or Air National Guard he is a member, as prescribed in section 708 of title 32.

(Added Pub. L. 90–235, §8(1)(A), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 763; amended Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(a)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–456 struck out "the Canal Zone," after "Puerto Rico,".
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Enterprises Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Roy Piceni
---------------------------------
Roy Piceni
President and Chief Executive Officer
December 22, 2003

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 ("Section  906"), or other document  authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been  provided  to  Satellite  Enterprises,  Corp.  and will be  retained by
Satellite  Enterprises,  Corp.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 2.903 What will Indian Affairs do if I request alternative dispute resolution?

If all interested parties concur, the reviewing official may stay (discontinue consideration of) the appeal while the parties pursue ADR. Where the parties agree to use ADR, Indian Affairs and other interested parties may seek assistance from the Department of the Interior's Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR). CADR can assist in planning and facilitating an effective collaboration or dispute resolution process. Parties are encouraged to consider best practices for engagement, including but not limited to, the use of neutral facilitation and other collaborative problem-solving approaches to promote effective dialogue and conflict resolution.
# C_2014021EN.01000301.xml

| 24.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 21/04

| Date of adoption of the decision | 19.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37637 (13/N) |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Wijzigingen van de Aanloopsteunproject voor nieuwe gecombineerdvervoerdiensten op basis van het Twin Hub spoorwegnet (SA.31981 en SA.34743) |
| Legal basis | Het aanstaande besluit van het monitoring comité van het INTERREG IVB-Noordwest Europa programma |
| Type of measure | Individual aid | — |
| Objective | Sectoral development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 1,8 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

19.12.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37637 (13/N)

Member State

Netherlands

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Wijzigingen van de Aanloopsteunproject voor nieuwe gecombineerdvervoerdiensten op basis van het Twin Hub spoorwegnet (SA.31981 en SA.34743)

Legal basis

Het aanstaande besluit van het monitoring comité van het INTERREG IVB-Noordwest Europa programma

Type of measure

Individual aid

—

Objective

Sectoral development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 1,8 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 0,45 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 0,45 million

Intensity

50 %

Duration (period)

1.10.2011-31.12.2015

Economic sectors

Freight rail transport

Name and address of the granting authority

| Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (L’unique organisme de paiement pour l’ensemble du programme INTERREG) |
| --- |
| 15 Quai Anatole |
| 75356 Paris 07 SP |
| FRANCE |

Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (L’unique organisme de paiement pour l’ensemble du programme INTERREG)

15 Quai Anatole

75356 Paris 07 SP

FRANCE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
§ 273.113 How can the funds be used under the Johnson-O'Malley Act? An eligible entity may use the funds available under the contract to provide educational benefits to eligible Indian students to: ( a ) Establish, carry out programs or expand programs in existence before the contract period that provide: ( 1 ) Remedial instruction, career, academic, and college-readiness counseling, and cultural programs;
( 2 ) Selected courses related to the academic and professional disciplines; or
( 3 ) Important needs, such as school supplies and items that enable recipients to participate in curricular and extra-curricular programs; and
( b ) Purchase equipment to facilitate training for professional trade skills and intensified college preparation programs.
### §14505. Effect of failure of selection for promotion: reserve captains of the Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps and reserve lieutenants of the Navy

Unless retained as provided in section 12646 or 12686 of this title, a captain on the reserve active-status list of the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps or a lieutenant on the reserve active-status list of the Navy who has failed of selection for promotion to the next higher grade for the second time and whose name is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade and who has not been selected for continuation on the reserve active-status list under section 14701 of this title, shall be separated in accordance with section 14513 of this title not later than the first day of the seventh month after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2950.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1735

ERIC E. MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY; STATE OF VIRGINIA; UNITED STATES 

OF AMERICA; ENGLISH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.; DOUGLAS 

DALTON, JR., CEO; JESSICA D. ABER; JAMES P. KENT, JR.; VIRGINIA 

ATTORNEY GENERAL; JASON S. MIYARES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:21-cv-00762-DJN)

Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 22, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric E. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; 

Andrew Franklin Gann, Jr., Katherine Elizabeth Lehnen, Richmond, Virginia, Sylvia 

Macon Kastens, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1735 Doc: 22 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric E. Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended civil

complaint as to some defendants without prejudice for failure to serve under Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 4(m) and the remaining defendants with prejudice for failure to state a claim under Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Miller v. Colonial Pipeline Co., No. 3:21-

cv-00762-DJN (E.D. Va. June 24, 2022). We deny Miller’s motion for appointment of 

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1735 Doc: 22 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32(a)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Overnite Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leo H. Suggs, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ LEO H. SUGGS                     
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and President



May
9, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 123 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 15, 1999.
Whereas the U.S.S. ALABAMA (BB-60) was a South Dakota class battleship that 
        served first in the North Atlantic and then in the Pacific Fleet during 
        World War II;
Whereas in the course of World War II, the crewmembers of the U.S.S. ALABAMA 
        directly shot down 22 enemy aircraft;
Whereas the crewmembers of the U.S.S. ALABAMA earned the American Service Medal, 
        the European-African-Middle Eastern Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign 
        Medal with 9 Battle Stars, the Philippine Republic Presidential Unit 
        Citation, the Philippine Liberation Ribbon, the World War II Victory 
        Medal, and the Navy Occupation Service Medal;
Whereas the crewmembers of the U.S.S. ALABAMA were a courageous group, braving 
        both the Arctic chill and the Pacific heat to help defend the Nation 
        against enemy oppression;
Whereas many former crewmembers of the U.S.S. ALABAMA belong to the U.S.S. 
        ALABAMA Crewmen's Association;
Whereas each year former crewmembers participate in an annual reunion to 
        celebrate their shared service, memories, and friendship; and
Whereas more than 100 former crewmembers, along with family and friends, are 
        expected to participate in the next reunion, which will be held from 
        April 15 to 18, 1999, aboard the U.S.S. ALABAMA at Battleship Memorial 
        Park in Mobile, Alabama: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes and honors the 
crewmembers of the U.S.S. ALABAMA (BB-60) and the U.S.S. ALABAMA Crewmen's 
Association for their valuable contributions to victory and peace in World War 
II and to the security and prosperity of the Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 314 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 314

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that all parties 
involved in negotiating the compensation for the Nazi slave and forced 
labor victims should achieve a settlement that is fair and equitable to 
                             all claimants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1999

 Mr. Kleczka submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that all parties 
involved in negotiating the compensation for the Nazi slave and forced 
labor victims should achieve a settlement that is fair and equitable to 
                             all claimants.

Whereas class action lawsuits seeking wages and damages arising from slave and 
        forced labor during the Nazi era have been filed against German 
        companies which have formed the Foundation Initiative for German 
        Enterprises;
Whereas efforts to negotiate a settlement have begun; and
Whereas representatives of the interested parties will be meeting in Washington, 
        D.C., on October 6, 1999, to continue the negotiations: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the Sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) members of the Foundation Initiative for German 
        Enterprises should be commended for recognizing their moral 
        responsibility for the behavior of private companies during the 
        Nazi era; and
            (2) Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Stuart Eizenstat 
        should mediate the negotiations in a way that will ensure a 
        settlement that is fair and equitable to all claimants.
                                 <all>
```
# TheAttorney General ofTexas January 14, 1982 MARK WHITE Attorney General
Supreme Court Building P.0. BOX12546 Austin. TX. 76711 512/475aOl Telex 9101874.1367 Telecopier 51214750266

1607 Main St..suite 1400 Dallas, TX. 75201 21417428944

4624Alberta Ave.,Suite 160 ElPaso.TX. 79905 9151533.3464

1220 Dallas Ave., Suite 202 Houston, TX. 77002 7131650.0666
SO5Broadway, Suite 312 Lubbock, TX. 79401 SWi’47.5236

4309 N.Tenth. Suite B McAllen, TX. 76501 51216624547

200Main Plaza, Suite 400 SanAntonio, TX. 76205 5121225-4191

An Equal OpportunityI Affirmative Action Employer Mr. John Lloyd Bluntser, Chairman Board of Regents PanAmerican university Edinburg, Texas 78539 Opinion No. MW-425 RS: Disposition of restricted purpose funds donated to a university Dear Mr. Bluntzer: You request an opinion of the legal status of $58,324 in funds transferred from your Unrestricted Donations Account No. 2901 to the Business School Excellence Fund. It appears from your letter and supporting data that PanAmerican university received $76,725 in donations from various companies. These funds were restricted to “se in the business school andwere set aside as aBusiness School Excellence Fund. It further appears that a transfer of $58,324 wasmadefrom the Business School Excellence Fund, where the restricted funds were placed, to Unrestricted Donations Account and then returned to the Business School Excellence Fund. Section 112.34 of the Texas Education Code provides: The board may accept donations, gifts, and endowments for the university to be held in trust andadministered by the board for the purposes and under any directions, limitations, and provisions that maybe declared in writing in the donation, gift, or endowment, consistent with the laws of the state and the objectives andproper management of the university. That statute is controlling. The $58,324 in question was, according to the information you have furnished to this office, placed in the Business School Excellence Fund, removed, and returned. That sum is now in the proper account and any use of it is governed by section 112.34 of the Texas Education Code. Your letter also indicates that areport of the Governor’s Budget and Planning Office suggested that this sumbe placed in the General Revenue Fundof the state. Such transfer would be contrary to section 112.34 of the Texas Education Code. The funds maybe used only for

p. 1448Mr. John Lloyd Bluntzer - Page 2 (MW-425)

those purposes authorized by the donor pursuant to section 112.34 of the Education Code. SUMMARY

Funds received by PanAmerican University by gift or donation are subject to the provisions of section 112.34 of the Texas Education Code. Very truly yours,

MARK WHITE Attorney General of Texas JOHNW.FAINTER,JR. First Assistant Attorney General RICHARDE. GRAYIII Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared byJerry Cain Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE Susan L. Garrison, Chairman Jon Bible Jerry Cain Rick Gilpin JimMoellinger Bruce Youngblood

p. 1449
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF WILLIAM MORRO, MANAGING
DIRECTOR OF

BLUENRGY GROUP LIMITED PURSUANT TO SECTION
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment
No.1 on Form 20-F/A to the Annual Report of BlueNRGY Group Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the
period ending June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
        
        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 10, 2015



|By: | /s/ William Morro             | 
|--- | ----------------------------- | 
|    | Name: William Morro           | 
|    | Title: Managing Director      | 
|    | (Principal Executive Officer) |
# C_2006165EN.01003301.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/33

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2006 — Schmit v Commission

(Case F-3/05) (1)

1

(Community officials - Promotion - Assessment - Time-limit for complaint - Interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 165/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Nadine Schmit ((Ispra, Italy) (represented by: P.-P. Van Gehuchten, P. Jadoul and Ph. Reyniers, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the decision of 3 December 2003 by which the Commission did not include the applicant among the officials promoted in the 2003 procedure; second, application for annulment of the decision according to which the applicant's competence, performance and conduct in the service were not the subject of a career development report for the 2001-2002 period; third, application for damages for the losses allegedly caused as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | The parties are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6 of 8.1.2005 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under Case T-419/04 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          26,612
<SECURITIES>                                    89,856
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,270)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,337
<PP&E>                                           6,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,531)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,665
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,902
<SALES>                                         35,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,777
<CGS>                                           14,608
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,529)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,740)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,740)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>