alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 372

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1495) to amend title XVIII

of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage of outpatient prescription drugs under the Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1999

Mr. STARK (for himself and Mr. BROWN of Ohio) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1495) to amend

title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for

coverage of outpatient prescription drugs under the

Medicare Program.

1 Resolved, That immediately after the adoption of this

2 resolution the House shall resolve into the Committee of

3 the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider4 ation of the bill (H.R. 1495) to amend title XVIII of the

5 Social Security Act to provide for coverage of outpatient

6 prescription drugs under the Medicare program. The first

7 reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of

8 order against the bill and against its consideration are
2

•HRES 372 IH

1 waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

2 shall not exceed two hours, with one hour equally divided

3 and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

4 member of the Committee on Commerce and one hour

5 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank6 ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and

7 Means. After general debate the bill shall be considered

8 for amendment under the five-minute rule. Each section

9 of the bill shall be considered as read. At the conclusion

10 of consideration of the bill for amendment, the Committee

11 shall rise and report the bill to the House with such

12 amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

13 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

14 amendments thereto to final passage without intervening

15 motion, except one motion to recommit with or without

16 instructions.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4225]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Release of Federally 
Obligated Property at Gwinnett County Airport, Lawrenceville, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c), 
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from the 
Gwinnett County Airports Authority to waive the requirement that a 
0.46-acre parcel of Federally obligated property, located at the 
Gwinnett County Airport, be used for aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 30, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Atlanta Airports 
District Office, Attn: Lisa Favors, Program Manager, 1701 Columbia 
Ave., Suite 2-260, Atlanta, GA 30337-2747.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Matthew L. Smith, Airport Director at the 
following address: 600 Briscoe Boulevard, Lawrenceville, GA 30046-4680.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Favors, Program Manager, Atlanta 
Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., Campus Bldg., Suite 2-
260, College Park, GA 30337, (404) 305-7145. The application may be 
reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by the 
Gwinnett County Airport Authority to release 0.46 acres of Federally 
obligated property at the Gwinnett County Airport. The property will be 
released for purchase of compatible, industrial development. The net 
proceeds from the sale of this property will be used for airport 
purposes. The proposed use of this property is compatible with airport 
operations.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the request, 
notice and other documents germane to the request in person at the 
Gwinnett County Airport Authority.

    Issued in Atlanta, Georgia, on February 15, 2011.
Scott L. Seritt,
Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-4225 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 162.543 May permanent improvements be made under a WSR lease? ( a ) A WSR lease must provide for the installation of a facility and associated infrastructure of a size and magnitude necessary for the generation and delivery of electricity, in accordance with § 162.019. These facilities and associated infrastructure are considered permanent improvements. A resource development plan must be submitted for approval with the lease under § 162.563(h).
( b ) If the parties agree to any of the following changes to the resource development plan after lease approval, they must submit the revised plan to BIA for the file: ( 1 ) Location of permanent improvements;
( 2 ) Type of permanent improvements; or
( 3 ) Delay of 90 days or more in any phase of development.
### Landslides of Rio de Janeiro and the Serra das Araras escarpment, Brazil

By: Fred O. Jones

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp697

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Slope stability programs for the city of Rio de Janeiro and environs and the landslide disaster of the Serra das Araras escarpment, Brazil, 1967(1968)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §12403. Army and Air National Guard of the United States: members; status in which ordered into Federal service

Members of the Army National Guard of the United States ordered to active duty shall be ordered to duty as Reserves of the Army. Members of the Air National Guard of the United States ordered to active duty shall be ordered to duty as Reserves of the Air Force.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(f)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2993; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(b)(18)(B), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 497.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 3497 and 8497 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(f)(2).

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 inserted "the" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–106 effective as if included in the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, title XVI of Pub. L. 103–337, as enacted on Oct. 5, 1994, see section 1501(f)(3) of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as a note under section 113 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
§ 226.18 Information to be given surface owners prior to commencement of drilling operations. Except for the surveying and staking of a well, no operations of any kind shall commence until the lessee or his/her authorized representative shall meet with the surface owner or his/her representative, if a resident of and present in Osage County, Oklahoma. Unless waived by the Superintendent or otherwise agreed to between the lessee and surface owner, such meeting shall be held at least 10 days prior to the commencement or any operations, except for the surveying and staking of the well. At such meeting lessee or his/her authorized representative shall comply with the following requirements: ( a ) Indicate the location of the well or wells to be drilled.
( b ) Arrange for route of ingress and egress. Upon failure to agree on route ingress and egress, said route shall be set by the Superintendent.
( c ) Impart to said surface owners the name and address of the party or representative upon whom the surface owner shall serve any claim for damages which he may sustain from mineral development or operations, and as to the procedure for settlement thereof as provided in § 226.21.
( d ) Where the drilling is to be on restricted land, lessee or his authorized representative in the manner provided above shall meet with the Superintendent.
( e ) When the surface owner or his/her representative is not a resident of, or is not physically present in, Osage County, Oklahoma, or cannot be contacted at the last known address, the Superintendent may authorize lessee to proceed with operations.
#### WILLIS v. MANN

No. 29P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 450

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 March 1990.
#### § 152.20 Sale by Secretary of certain land in multiple ownership.

Pursuant to the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 855), as amended (25 U.S.C. 372), if the Secretary decides that one or more of the heirs who have inherited trust land are incapable of managing their own affairs, he may sell any or all interests in that land. This authority is not applicable to lands authorized to be sold by the Act of May 14, 1948 (62 Stat. 236; 25 U.S.C. 483).
# C_2006190EN.01003502.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/35

---

Action brought on 23 June 2006 — Andersson and Others v Commission

(Case F-69/06)

(2006/C 190/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Tommy Andersson (Brussels, Belgium) and Others (represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the individual decisions rejecting the applicants' requests that the Appointing Authority adopt transitional measures in order to ensure, in the context of the 2005 and subsequent promotion exercises, equal treatment and their acquired rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the individual decisions rejecting the applicants' requests that the Appointing Authority adopt transitional measures in order to ensure, in the context of the 2005 and subsequent promotion exercises, equal treatment and their acquired rights;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants put forward identical pleas to those put forward in Case F-47/06 (1).

1

---

(1)  OJ C 154, 1.07.2006, p. 25.

1

---
[4910-13-P)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON ~=

SYIllOOL

-7

~m"l.SlSKl

DATE

c.~

i((0

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lisle

ACTION: Final rule; requestror comments.

(DOT).

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes

ot.f~6-

[Docket No. FAA-2010-****r; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM"-084-AD;

1(,-;.7>3 10 -0'1

Amendment 39-*****; AD 2010-**-**]

R1N 2120-AA64

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Operators ofDHC-8 4iOO Series aeroplanes have been reporting

chafing of wires in the AC wire harnesses locatedlalong the lower

wing shroud on either ring resulting in a loss of"arious system

services. Chafed wire~ may lead to arcing, local overheating and AC

generator failure. The iAC generators provide power to the anti-icing

beaters, including pitot I static heater, engine adapter heater, and

propeller heater. Failure of both AC generators would result in the loss

of these systems and poses a safety concern.

'lOUTING SYM!lOl

~ITIAt..SISIC

'"

* * * * * * *

OCrm:C SY1IIIIOl

Loss of both AC generators CfUld lead to unaonunclated loss ofheatto both engine inlet, m=,<o

which could lead to loss of power in both engines during icing conditions. This AD 'AT~
[4910-13- "CUR"""CES

ROUnNG SYMBOl.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

ANE-171

,~

LGB-AEG

'N'l'~LSIS,

ROU1'''''' SYMUOl.

RIN 2120-AA64

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

{e

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listet;;;7o

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) jA~

originated by an aviation authority of another country to ldentifY and correct an unsafe ,

I

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Operators ofDHC-8 4bo Series aeroplanes have Jeen reporting

chafing of wires in thel AC wire harnesses locatedl along the lower

wing shroud on either ;wing resulting in a loss of iarious system

services. Chafed wires may lead to arcing, local 0rerheating and AC

generator failure. The f'.C generators provide po"'[er to the anti-icing

heaters, including pitot I static heater, engine adanter heater, and

propeller heater. Failure of both AC generators wbuld result in the loss

of these systems and poses a safety concern.

Airworthiness Directivesj Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

Amendment 39-*"'***; AD 2010-**-**)

[Docket No. FAA-2010-****"'; Diredorate Identifier 201O-NM-084-AD;

• • • • • • •

Loss ofbotb AC generators could lead to unannunciated loss of heat to both engine inlets

•,

which could lead to loss of power in both engines during icing conditions. This AD

\
#### Barney Cohen, Respondent, v. Isaac Regierer and Another, Appellants.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present —Woodward,-Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor . and Rich, J J.
### [§687. Renumbered §12319]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 687 was renumbered section 12321 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 687, added Pub. L. 87–651, title I, §102(a), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 506; amended Pub. L. 89–718, §6, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1115, related to readjustment payment upon involuntary release of non-regulars from active duty, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title I, §109(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2870, effective Sept. 15, 1981.
#### WILLIAM L. BAMBERGER, JR. v. ROGER B. BERNHOLZ and COLEMAN, BERNHOLZ, DICKERSON, BERNHOLZ, GLEDHILL, and HARGRAVE, a North Carolina General Partnership

No. 1A90

(Filed 10 May 1990)

Appeal by defendants pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 96 N.C. App. 555, 386 S.E.2d 450 (1989), reversing summary judgment for defendants entered 19 August 1988 by *Farmer, J.,*in the Superior Court, ORANGE County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 April 1990.

*Elliot & Pishko, P.A., by David C. Pishko, for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Young, Moore, Henderson & Alvis, P.A., by M. Lee Cheney and Jerry S. Alvis, for defendant-appellants.*

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in Judge Lewis’ dissenting opinion.

Reversed.
### [§2519. Renumbered §4833]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# TIME AND PLACE:

Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# OPEN AGENDA ITEMS:

Item No. 1: Ex-Im Bank Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee for 2011.

# PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:

The meeting will be open to public observation for Item No. 1 only.

# FURTHER INFORMATION:

For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3957.

Jonathan J. Cordone,

Senior Vice President and General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2011-4120 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
IV

House Calendar No. 160

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 382

[Report No. 106–475]

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 17, 1999

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 the legislative day of Thursday, November 18, 1999, for

3 the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules,

4 provided that the object of any such motion is announced

5 from the floor at least one hour before the motion is of6 fered. In scheduling the consideration of legislation under

7 this authority, the Speaker or his designee shall consult

8 with the Minority Leader or his designee.
House Calendar No. 160

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 382

[Report No. 106–475]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend

the rules.

NOVEMBER 17, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### §905. Art. 105. Forgery

Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to defraud—

(1) falsely makes or alters any signature to, or any part of, any writing which would, if genuine, apparently impose a legal liability on another or change his legal right or liability to his prejudice; or

(2) utters, offers, issues, or transfers such a writing, known by him to be so made or altered;

is guilty of forgery and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 74, §923; renumbered §905, Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5401(12), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2939.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 923 | 50:717. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 123), 64 Stat. 141. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 905 was renumbered section 898 of this title.

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 renumbered section 923 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
From: Emmanuel Quizon [equizon@aqmd.gov]

Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 4:10 PM

To: Land, Eva

Subject: Particulate Emissions from Spraying Operation

Attachments: Rule 1469.1 Adopted 3

- 4

- 05.DOC; GuidelPMEmisCalcuSprayCoatingO.pdf

Eva,

Below is the equation and the filter control efficiency we used for calculating particulate emissions from

spraying operation. For spray equipment other than HVLP or electrostatic spray gun we use a transfer

efficiency of 35% unless test data on the spray gun transfer efficiency is provided and approved by the

SCAQMD. For open spray equipment we use a fall

- out factor of 20%. No fall

- out factor is given for

coating operation using a spray booth because all the overspray should be collected by the spray bo oth.

For wet coating operation we assume that 50% of PM is PM 10

. For powder coating operation we

assume that PM is equal to PM 10

.

If you have any question you can give me a call at (909) 396

- 2523.

Emmanuel