alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2193-2194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Correspondence Exam Practitioner Engagement

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/
Self Employed Correspondence Exam Practitioner Engagement will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 23, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Correspondence Exam Practitioner Engagement will be held 
Wednesday, February 23, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. 
For more information

[[Page 2194]]

please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write 
TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 5, 2011.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-415 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### §12309. Reserve officers: use of in expansion of armed forces

When an expansion of the active armed forces requires that officers of the reserve components who are not members of units organized to serve as such be ordered as individuals to active duty (other than for training) without their consent, the services of qualified and available reserve officers in all grades shall be used, so far as practicable, according to the needs of the branches, grades, or specialties concerned.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 29, §677; renumbered §12309, Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(e)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2992.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 677 | 50:961(f). | July 9, 1952, ch. 608, §233(f), 66 Stat. 490. |

The words "without their consent" are substituted for the word "involuntarily". The words "it shall be the policy" are omitted as surplusage. The words "to active duty (other than for training)" are substituted for the words "into the active military service".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 renumbered section 677 of this title as this section.
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE



The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among,  UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.,  as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from May 8, 2012 (the “Closing Date”) to December 31, 2012 and of such Certifying Servicer’s
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects from the Closing Date to the end of such calendar year.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 11, 2013
### [§2515. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §811(b)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1845]

Section, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4225(a), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2683; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1502(a)(22), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 505; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X, §1031(a)(23), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1598; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1084(b)(3), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2060; Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, §1061(18), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1584, established an Office of Technology Transition within the Office of the Secretary of Defense and set out its purpose and duties.

A prior section 2515, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, §823(a)(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1602, related to computer-integrated manufacturing technology, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–484, §4202(a).
#### § 36.99 Are immunizations required for residential program students?

Each student must have all immunizations required by State, local, or tribal governments before being admitted to a homeliving program. Annual flu shots are not required, but are encouraged.
§ 514.9 What happens if a gaming operation submits its fee payment or quarterly statement late? ( a ) In the event that a gaming operation fails to submit a fee payment or quarterly statement in a timely manner, the Chair of the Commission may issue a notice specifying: ( 1 ) The date the statement and/or payment was due;
( 2 ) The number of calendar days late the statement and/or payment was submitted;
( 3 ) A citation to the federal or tribal requirement that has been or is being violated;
( 4 ) The action being considered by the Chair; and
( 5 ) Notice of rights of appeal pursuant to subchapter H of this chapter.
( b ) Within fifteen (15) days of service of the notice, the recipient may submit written information about the notice to the Chair. The Chair shall consider any information submitted by the recipient as well as the recipient's history of untimely submissions or failure to file statements and/or fee payments over the preceding five (5) years in determining the amount of the late fee, if any.
( c ) When practicable, within thirty (30) days of issuing the notice described in paragraph (a) of this section to a recipient, the Chair of the Commission may assess a proposed late fee against a recipient for each failure to file a timely quarterly statement and/or fee payment: ( 1 ) For statements and/or fee payments one (1) to thirty (30) calendar days late, the Chair may propose a late fee of up to, but not more than 10% of the fee amount for that quarter;
( 2 ) For statements and/or fee payments thirty-one (31) to sixty (60) calendar days late, the Chair may propose a late fee of up to, but not more than 15% of the fee amount for that quarter; and
( 3 ) For statements and/or fee payments sixty-one (61) to ninety (90) calendar days late, the Chair may propose a late fee of up to, but not more than 20% of the fee amount for that quarter.
### §1412. Administrative provisions

(a) Rounding.—Amounts computed under this chapter, if not a multiple of $1, shall be rounded to the next lower multiple of $1.

(b) Payment Date.—Amounts of retired pay and retainer pay due a retired member of the uniformed services shall be paid on the first day of each month beginning after the month in which the right to such pay accrues.

(Added Pub. L. 99–348, title I, §105, July 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 691; amended Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VI, §632(a), (b)(1), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 111–383, §632(b)(1), substituted "Administrative provisions" for "Rounding to next lower dollar" in section catchline.

Pub. L. 111–383, §632(a), designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VI, §632(c), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4240, provided that: "Subsection (b) of section 1412 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply beginning with the first month that begins more than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 7, 2011]."
#### § 12.42 Do Indian country law enforcement programs share information with their own communities or other agencies?

At intervals established by the Director, each BIA criminal investigations program, and any investigations program receiving BIA funds will consult with local tribal leaders and managers of local patrol and detention programs. They will discuss the quality of the local investigations program and offer feedback and technical assistance. There will be no requirement to disclose confidential investigative information or to compromise ongoing investigations during this process.
IV

House Calendar No. 127

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 326

[Report No. 106–375]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2561) making appropriations for the Department of Defense

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1999

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2561) making appropriations

for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending

September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2561) making appropriations for

4 the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending Sep5 tember 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All points of

6 order against the conference report and against its consid-
2

HRES 326 RH

1 eration are waived. The conference report shall be consid2 ered as read.

House Calendar No. 127

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 326

[Report No. 106–375]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2561) making

appropriations for the Department of Defense forthe fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, andfor other purposes.

OCTOBER 12, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Premium Filings 
-  Premium Filing Due Dates 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Premium Filing Due Dates

In most cases, premiums are due on the 15th day of the 10th full calendar month in the plan year (*e.g.*, October 15th for calendar-year plans).   Special rules apply if:
                          - The plan is a New or Newly Covered Plan (including plans created as the result of a mid-year spinoff from another plan),
                          - The plan year changed since the prior year, or
                          - All assets are distributed during the plan year pursuant to a standard termination.

If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday or Federal Holiday, it is automatically extended to the next business day.  

The “When to File” section of the Comprehensive Premium Filing Instructions provides detailed information on due dates.  Instructions for the current and prior years are available on the Premium Payment and Filing Instruction page.

Ensure premium filings are submitted on time.

Submit premium filings through My Plan Administration Account (My PAA) on PBGC.gov.

September 11, 2023
### §8169. Policy as to leave and liberty

The commanding officer of a vessel shall favor the faithful and obedient in granting leave and liberty.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 372, §5949; renumbered §8169, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5949 | 34 U.S.C. 220. | R.S. 1431. |

The words "to exercise carefully a discrimination in" are omitted as surplusage. The words "leave and liberty" are substituted for "temporary leave of absence and liberty on shore" to conform to modern terminology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5949 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 43 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 24, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 436) to reduce waste, fraud, and error in Government programs by 
making improvements with respect to Federal management and debt collection 
practices, Federal payment systems, Federal benefit programs, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order 
against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with section 303 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate shall be confined to 
the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Government Reform. 
After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-
minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. During consideration of the 
bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 
minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. EP 558 (Sub-No. 14)]


Railroad Cost of Capital--2010

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of decision instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroad industry's 2010 cost of capital.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroad industry's cost of capital for 2010. The decision solicits 
comments on the following issues: (1) The railroads' 2010 current cost 
of debt capital; (2) the railroads' 2010 current cost of preferred 
equity capital (if any); (3) the railroads' 2010 cost of common equity 
capital; and (4) the 2010 capital structure mix of the railroad 
industry on a market value basis. Comments should focus on the various 
cost of capital components listed above using the same methodology 
followed in Railroad Cost of Capital--2009, EP 558 (Sub-No. 13) (STB 
served Oct. 29, 2010).

DATES: Notices of intent to participate are due by March 8, 2011. 
Statements of the railroads are due by April 29, 2011. Statements of 
other interested persons are due by May 19, 2011. Rebuttal statements 
by the railroads are due by June 8, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either via the Board's e-filing 
system or in the traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing 
should comply with the instructions at the E-FILING link on the Board's 
Web site, at http://www.stb.dot.gov. Any person submitting a filing in 
the traditional paper format should send an original and 10 copies to: 
Surface Transportation Board, Attn: Docket No. EP 558 (Sub-No. 14), 395 
E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245-0333. 
Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board's decision is posted on the 
Board's Web site, http://www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of the decision may be 
purchased by contacting the Board's Office of Public Assistance, 
Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245-0236. Assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at (800) 877-8339.
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment of the conservation of energy resources.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 10704(a).

    Decided: February 18, 2011.

    By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Nottingham, and 
Commissioner Mulvey.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011-4157 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Stephen V. Clark, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Bertucci’s Corporation;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted] for theRegistrant and have:

a.               designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b.              [omitted]

c.               evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.              disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.               The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe Registrant’s board of directors:

a.               all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.              any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: August 13, 2004

 
|   | By:                           | /s/ Stephen V. Clark |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Stephen V. Clark              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50190 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BYRON KEITH MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-91-CR-47-1

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Byron Keith Moore appeals his sentence of 21 months’ imprisonment following the revocation of his supervised release, which was originally part of his sentence for distribution of cocaine base. Moore argues that the sentence was plainly unreasonable because the district court should not have considered two of the violations alleged by the probation officer given that Moore had already served 13 months in state prison for the conduct described in the two violations.No. 98-50190 -2- We will affirm a sentence following the revocation of supervised release unless it was in violation of law or was plainly unreasonable. United States v. Mathena , 23 F.3d 87, 89 (5th Cir. 1994). Moore committed repeated violations of his supervised release, and his 21-month-imprisonment sentence is within the statutory range. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C); 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3). Moore’s sentence was not plainly unreasonable. See Mathena , 23 F.3d at 94. AFFIRMED.