alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006249EN.01001502.xml

| 14.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/15

---

Action brought on 25 August 2006 — PTV v OHIM (MAP&GUIDE The Mapware Company)

(Case T-226/06)

(2006/C 249/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by F. Nielsen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 16 June 2006 (Case R 1175/2005-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 16 June 2006 (Case R 1175/2005-1);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘MAP&GUIDE The Mapware Company’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16 and 42.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection in part of the application for registration.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The mark for which registration is sought is distinctive for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. (1)

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

1

---
### §8858. Duties of prize master

The prize master shall take the captured vessel to the selected port. On arrival he shall—

(1) deliver immediately to a prize commissioner the documents and papers and the inventory thereof;

(2) make affidavit that the documents and papers and the inventory thereof and the prize property are the same and are in the same condition as delivered to him, or explaining any loss or absence or change in their condition;

(3) report all information respecting the prize and her capture to the United States attorney;

(4) deliver the persons sent as witnesses to the custody of the United States marshal; and

(5) retain the prize in his custody until it is taken therefrom by process from the prize court.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 476, §7658; renumbered §8858, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7658 | 34 U.S.C. 1134. | R.S. 4617. |

The word "diligently" is omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7658 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Update

As of March 31, 2023

JTF-RH is currently ON PLAN to safely defuel by June 2024.

Working in partnership with the DOH and EPA, we are seeking to optimize the schedule to start defueling earlier.

DoD Repairs Completed

174/253

Start Complete

Number of Validated Repairs 

Submitted to DOH for Review/Approval

Next 90 Days May 2023 June 2023 July 2023

June 5: FTAC1 Open House – Hosted by DOH 

June 6: FTAC – Hosted by DOH

June 8: Response Drill

June 9: NEPA

1 Public Comment Period Begins 

June 15: NEPA Public Meeting

June 30: NEPA Public Comment Period Ends

July 13: Response Drill

3

rd Party Quality Validation Completed 

106/253

Start Complete

Joint Task Force – Red Hill

Defueling Dashboard

As of April 21, 2023

Subject to Revision

Dashboard Legend 1

DISF: Defueling Information Sharing Forum

FTAC: Fuel Tank Advisory Committee

NEPA: National Environmental Policy Act

Defueling Open House

Ke’ehi Lagoon 

Memorial Park, 4 to 7p.m. 

Click on the photo for an 

enlarged PDF version.

The Process of Defueling

JTF-RH is focused on completing repairs, quality 

control tasks, training, response preparation, 

regulatory approvals and operational planning for all 

major milestones. This work will help ensure the 

safe and expeditious defueling of Red Hill. To learn 

more about this process, click the link here. 

Start Complete

Key Events

56/253

May 17: DISF1 Fourth Meeting

May 23-24: Defueling Open House

May 31: Projected DoD Repairs Complete

DOH Conditional Approval

Start Complete

6/253
# C_2006300EN.01002601.xml

| 9.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/26

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4393 — Istithmar/Mubadala/DAE/SR Technics)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 300/10)

On 21 November 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4393. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4393. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
§ 163.10 Management of Indian forest land. ( a ) The Secretary shall undertake forest land management activities on Indian forest land, either directly or through contracts, cooperative agreements, or grants under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93-638, as amended).
( b ) Indian forest land management activities undertaken by the Secretary shall be designed to achieve objectives enumerated in § 163.3 of this part.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Meier, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this   quarterly   report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  QuadTech
International, Inc. for the quarter ended April 30, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made known to us
by others,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;

(b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions);

(a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

June 14, 2006




           /s/ John Meier
           --------------
           John Meier
           President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Marjorie Teller, Respondent, v Grover Tubbs, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 387]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Klein, J.), entered July 15, 2005, as, after a hearing, found that he willfully failed to obey an earlier order of the same court dated May 28, 2004, and committed him to a term of incarceration of 30 days unless he purged himself of contempt by paying the sum of $ 7,043.84 towards child support arrears.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as committed the father to a term of incarceration of 30 days is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the period of incarceration has expired; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

In reviewing the Family Court’s finding, we give great deference to its determination, because it is in the best position to assess the credibility of the witnesses *(see Matter of Musarra v Musarra,*28 AD3d 668, 669 [2006]; *Matter of Department of Social Servs. v Henderson,*269 AD2d 395, 396 [2000]). Here, we agree with the Family Court that the father willfully violated the order dated May 28, 2004. The father’s failure to pay child support constituted prima facie evidence of a willful violation of the order *(see*Family Ct Act § 454 [3] [a]; *Matter of Falk v Owen,*29 AD3d 991, 991 [2006]; *see also Matter of Powers v Powers,*86 NY2d 63, 69 [1995]). The burden then shifted to the father to offer competent, credible evidence of his inability to comply with that order *(see Matter of Powers v Powers, supra*at 69-70; *Matter of Falk v Owen, supra*at 991; *Matter of Watson v Watson,*
      *59421 AD3d 497, 498 [2005]). The Family Court properly found that the father failed to demonstrate that he had made reasonable efforts to obtain gainful employment to meet his child support obligations and thus it properly rejected claims of unemployment and impoverishment (see *Matter of Hunt v Hunt,*30 AD3d 1065 [2006]; *Matter of Moore v Blank,*8 AD3d 1090, 1091 [2004]; *Matter of Fallon v Fallon,*286 AD2d 389, 389 [2001]). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
City of Atlantic . -,(>

: -.,·.., '. " 

\ ·, .. \ ... 

,. . ....-· .._ - ..----· 

CITY OF ATLANTtC 

23 East 4th Street

Atlantic, Iowa 50022

City lh.11!(712) 243-4810

Pu::l712)243-4407

nw.miofldarvlicmm

October 1, 2014 

Cecilia Tapia, Superfund Division Director 

Environmental Protection Agency 

901 North 5

th Street 

Kansas City, Kansas 66101 

RE: I.D. Number IAD039954300 

Director Tapia: 

Representatives of your agency have advised the City of Atlantic of its intent to move forward 

with the designating of I.D. Number IAD039954300 as a National Priorities List (NPL) site, 

makinffif pos'siblefo utilize Supeffimff iiioiiiesfo{cleaiiup· cosfa ...Please·oe· advised that the 

Cify of Atlantic believes that this action is in the best interests of all concerned and that we 

support the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) decision to move forward with the 

nomination of the above listed site for the NPL. We understand that neither the City of Atlantic 

nor Atlantic Municipal Utilities will have any financial obligation for any costs for the 

removal or remediation of contamination associated with this site. 

We would also like to formally request the designation of the site be changed from I.D. Number 

IAD039954300 to the "Former Dry Cleaner Site". 

If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact 

Atlantic Municipal Utilities (AMU) at your earliest opportunity. 

o:;:

Dave Jones, Mayor 

Cc: Susan Fisher, EPA

Cal Lundberg, IDNR 

Keith Wilken, Region 4 IDNR
### §4652. Prohibition on use of funds for documenting economic or employment impact of certain acquisition programs

No funds appropriated by the Congress may be obligated or expended to assist any contractor of the Department of Defense in preparing any material, report, lists, or analysis with respect to the actual or projected economic or employment impact in a particular State or congressional district of an acquisition program for which all research, development, testing, and evaluation has not been completed.

(Added Pub. L. 103–355, title VII, §7202(a)(1), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3379, §2247; renumbered §2249, Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4321(b)(2)(A), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 672; renumbered §4652, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1862(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4277.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4652 was renumbered section 7652 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 2249 of this title as this section.

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 renumbered section 2247 of this title as section 2249.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

For effective date and applicability of section, see section 10001 of Pub. L. 103–355 set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 8752 of this title.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2 – CFO Certification**




**SATELLITE
      NEWSPAPERS CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Newspapers Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy
      Hibma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.
      1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.




By:
      /s/ Randy Hibma


Randy
      Hibma


Chief
      Financial Officer






August
      20, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Satellite Newspapers Corp., and will be retained by Satellite
      Newspapers Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
### §1193. Modification of plan

(a) Modification Before Confirmation.—The debtor may modify a plan at any time before confirmation, but may not modify the plan so that the plan as modified fails to meet the requirements of sections 1122 and 1123 of this title, with the exception of subsection (a)(8) of such section 1123. After the modification is filed with the court, the plan as modified becomes the plan.

(b) Modification After Confirmation.—If a plan has been confirmed under section 1191(a) of this title, the debtor may modify the plan at any time after confirmation of the plan and before substantial consummation of the plan, but may not modify the plan so that the plan as modified fails to meet the requirements of sections 1122 and 1123 of this title, with the exception of subsection (a)(8) of such section 1123. The plan, as modified under this subsection, becomes the plan only if circumstances warrant the modification and the court, after notice and a hearing, confirms the plan as modified under section 1191(a) of this title.

(c) Certain Other Modifications.—If a plan has been confirmed under section 1191(b) of this title, the debtor may modify the plan at any time within 3 years, or such longer time not to exceed 5 years, as fixed by the court, but may not modify the plan so that the plan as modified fails to meet the requirements of section 1191(b) of this title. The plan as modified under this subsection becomes the plan only if circumstances warrant such modification and the court, after notice and a hearing, confirms such plan, as modified, under section 1191(b) of this title.

(d) Holders of a Claim or Interest.—If a plan has been confirmed under section 1191(a) of this title, any holder of a claim or interest that has accepted or rejected the plan is deemed to have accepted or rejected, as the case may be, the plan as modified, unless, within the time fixed by the court, such holder changes the previous acceptance or rejection of the holder.

(Added Pub. L. 116–54, §2(a), Aug. 23, 2019, 133 Stat. 1083.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Aug. 23, 2019, see section 5 of Pub. L. 116–54, set out as an Effective Date of 2019 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
Exhibit 10.14


 


Agreement


 


Party A:GOLDEN
SUN EDUCATION GROUP LIMITED


 


Party B:Weng
Xueyuan and Ye Xiulan


 


Shanghai Golden Sun Education
Group Co., Ltd. held by Party A hereby decides to transfer it to Party B. The specific agreements are as follows:


 


1. Party A holds 100% of the equity of Shanghai
Golden Sun Education Group Co., Ltd. and now decides to transfer it to Party B. Among them, 90% of the equity is transferred to Weng Xueyuan
with an amount of HK $90000.00, and 10% of the equity is transferred to Ye Xiulan with an amount of HK $10000.00.


 


2. After the transfer, Party B shall be responsible
for all creditor’s rights and debts of Shanghai Golden Sun Education Group Co., Ltd., Party A shall no longer be responsible, and Party
A shall be responsible for the creditor’s rights and debts generated before the transfer.


 


3. This agreement is made in triplicate, one for
each party, with the same legal effect. This Agreement shall come into force after being signed and sealed by both parties.


 


	Signature/Date:	GOLDEN SUN EDUCATION GROUP LIMITED
	September 30, 2021	 	 


 


	Signature/Date:	Weng Xueyuan and Ye Xiulan
	September 30, 2021
155 So.2d 611

#### Ex parte Ernest WILSON. In re Ernest WILSON v. STATE.

4 Div. 176.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 1, 1963.

*440Ernest Wilson, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Paul T. Gish, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

HARWOOD, Justice.

This is a petition for a writ of error looking toward a review of a judgment denying the petitioner relief in a coram nobis proceeding. The judgment below was entered after a full hearing.

Coram nobis proceedings are essentially civil in nature, and in Brown v. State, 250 Ala. 444, 35 So.2d 518, coram nobis was described as being “in the nature of a new civil suit.”

Under our practice and procedure appeals lie from final judgments denying relief in coram nobis proceedings. Allen v. State, Ala.App., 150 So.2d 399.

Section 383, Title 15, Code of Alabama 1940, provides: “A writ of error on any judgment rendered in a criminal case may issue * * *.” Under the doctrine of our cases a writ of error may be had only in criminal cases, civil causes being reviewed only by appeal. Smotherman v. State, 140 Ala. 168, 37 So. 376, or in appropriate cases by statutory certiorari.

The State of Alabama through its Attorney General has filed a motion to strike this petition for writ of error on the grounds, among others, that (1) a writ of error is not the proper method by which a denial of a petition for coram nobis may be reviewed, and (2) an appeal lies from the denial of a petition for a writ of error coram nobis.

Under the controlling doctrines above referred to, the motion of the State is well taken and must be granted.

Record stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and STMPSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 88]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 1278]]

Public Law 115-88
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title 40, United States Code, to eliminate the sunset of 
  certain provisions relating to information technology, to amend the 
 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 to extend the 
sunset relating to the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative, and 
       for other purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 21, 2017 -  [H.R. 3243]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: FITARA 
Enhancement Act of 2017. 40 USC 101 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FITARA Enhancement Act of 2017''.
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF SUNSET RELATING TO TRANSPARENCY AND RISK 
                    MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
                    INVESTMENTS.

    Subsection (c) of section 11302 of title 40, United States Code, is 
amended by striking the first paragraph (5).
SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF SUNSET RELATING TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
                    PORTFOLIO, PROGRAM, AND RESOURCE REVIEWS.

    Section 11319 of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating the second subsection (c) as subsection 
        (d); and
            (2) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by striking 
        paragraph (6).
SEC. 4. EXTENSION OF SUNSET RELATING TO FEDERAL DATA CENTER 
                    CONSOLIDATION INITIATIVE.

    Subsection (e) of section 834 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113-291; 44 U.S.C. 3601 note) is 
amended by striking ``2018'' and inserting ``2020''.

    Approved November 21, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3243:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-344 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Oct. 11, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```