alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1998             DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-1999             JUN-25-1999
<CASH>                                               0                     778
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  20,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                   (901)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  19,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  41,958
<PP&E>                                               0                  54,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                 (7,593)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 257,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                (13,112)
<BONDS>                                              0               (115,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                (33,403)
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                (63,125)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                   7,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  55,563
<SALES>                                       (27,274)                (54,443)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (27,274)                (54,443)
<CGS>                                           15,743                  31,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,924                  18,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (17)                    (44)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,973                   7,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,349                   2,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (575)                 (1,122)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                774                   1,595
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       774                   1,595
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-2 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2013 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2012-2 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 28, 2014By:

/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 28, 2014
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 28, 2014
# C_2006288EN.01000101.xml

| 25.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 November 2006

(2006/C 288/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3078 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 151,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4542 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67690 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0375 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5826 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,02 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2625 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5779 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,025 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 259,36 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6976 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8271 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4901 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,66 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 35,635 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9290 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6817 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4817 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1716 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9538 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0280 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 219,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4321 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2695 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3390 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 954,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7545 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,011 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,728 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3078

JPY

Japanese yen

151,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4542

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67690

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0375

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5826

ISK

Iceland króna

92,02

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2625

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5779

CZK

Czech koruna

28,025

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

259,36

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6976

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8271

RON

Romanian leu

3,4901

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,66

SKK

Slovak koruna

35,635

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9290

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6817

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4817

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1716

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9538

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0280

KRW

South Korean won

1 219,00

ZAR

South African rand

9,4321

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2695

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3390

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 954,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7545

PHP

Philippine peso

65,011

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5600

THB

Thai baht

47,728

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 181.5 How are applications ranked? BIA ranks each timely filed application by assigning points based upon four factors. ( a ) *Factor No. 1—Magnitude of the problem* (Up to 50 points available). In awarding points under this factor, BIA will take into account the following: ( 1 ) Whether a highway safety problem exists.
( 2 ) Whether the problem is significant.
( 3 ) Whether the proposed tribal project will contribute to resolution of the identified highway safety problem.
( 4 ) The number of traffic accidents occurring within the applicant's jurisdiction over the previous 3 years.
( 5 ) The number of alcohol-related traffic accidents occurring within the applicant's jurisdiction over the previous 3 years.
( 6 ) The number of reported traffic fatalities occurring within the applicant's jurisdiction over the previous 3 years.
( 7 ) The number of reported alcohol-related traffic fatalities occurring within the applicant's jurisdiction over the previous 3 years.
( b ) *Factor No. 2—Countermeasure selection* (Up to 40 points available). In awarding points under this factor, BIA will take into account the following: ( 1 ) Whether the countermeasures selected are the most effective for the identified highway safety problem.
( 2 ) Whether the countermeasures selected are cost effective.
( 3 ) Whether the applicant's objectives are realistic and attainable.
( 4 ) Whether the applicant's objectives are time framed and, if so, whether the time frames are realistic and attainable.
( c ) *Factor No. 3—Tribal Leadership and Community Support* (Up to 10 points available). In awarding points under this factor, BIA will take into account the following: ( 1 ) Whether the applicant proposes using tribal resources in the project.
( 2 ) Whether the appropriate tribal governing body supports the proposal plan, as evidenced by a tribal resolution or otherwise.
( 3 ) Whether the community supports the proposal plan, as evidenced by letters or otherwise.
( d ) *Factor No. 4—Past Performance* (+ or −10 points available). In awarding points under this factor, BIA will take into account the following: ( 1 ) Financial and programmatic reporting requirements.
( 2 ) Project accomplishments.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.4

                             RAILWORKS CORPORATION
                             1104 KENILWORTH DRIVE
                                   SUITE 301
                              BALTIMORE, MD 21204

                               September 20, 1999


Mr. John G. Larkin
403 Somerset Road
Baltimore, MD  28280

RE:  AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED
     AUGUST 4, 1998 ("AGREEMENT") BETWEEN JOHN G. LARKIN
     AND RAILWORKS CORPORATION ("CORPORATION")

Dear Mr. Larkin:

         This letter serves as an amendment ("Amendment") to the Agreement.
Commencing as of June 1, 1999, on the second line of Section 3.1(a) of the
Agreement "Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($275,000.00) per annum"
is deemed deleted, and replaced with the following: "Three Hundred Twenty-Five
Thousand Dollars ($325,000.00) per annum". This Amendment is deemed retroactive
and effective as of June 1, 1999.

         Except as specifically provided herein, the Agreement remains in full
force and effect, and is neither amended nor modified.

         Please acknowledge your agreement to the Amendment by signing and
returning a copy to the undersigned.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        RAILWORKS CORPORATION



                                        By: /s/ John G. Larkin
                                            -----------------------------------
/jdc                                        Name:  John G. Larkin
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chairman of the Board

AGREED TO:



/s/ Michael R. Azarela        9/99
-----------------------------
    Michael R. Azarela
AFS-10-332-E 

Jul 22 2010 

 Exemption No. 8800B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-25960 

Mr. Anthony S. Pierce 

1221 South Elizabeth Street 

Denver, CO 80210 

Dear Mr. Pierce: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8800, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter posted July 14, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for 

an extension of Exemption No. 8800, as amended. That exemption from § 91.109(a) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows you to conduct certain flight training in 

Beechcraft Baron type aircraft that are equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to you. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8800, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 
 2

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8800, as amended, to 

October 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8800, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8800, as amended. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Bradley D. Pearson 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode 
Island, New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, April 12, 2011, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. 
For more information, please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton 
Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-4316 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                     |
| Dated: February 27, 2018                                       |
|                                                                |
| /s/ Venugopal Rathi                                                 |
| Venugopal RathiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
TS- ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #6

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 3

Environmental Release and Disposal Information on the New Chemical Substance s at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0540. DUANE E. BLOCKER, SR. v. THE STATE.

A jury convicted Duane E. Blocker, Sr. of simple battery and disorderly

conduct. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Blocker filed an appeal.

When Blocker failed either to pay costs or attend a hearing to establish hisindigence,

the trial court dismissed the direct appeal on May 29, 2015. Blocker filed this

application for discretionary appeal from the trial court’s order on August 6, 2015.

The trial court’s order dismissing a direct appeal may be appealed directly. See 

Howard v. State, 289 Ga. 207 n.1 (710 SE2d 761) (2011). Ordinarily, if a party

applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the

application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the

application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (d) & (j); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). 

Here, Blocker filed his application 69 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal

and it is thus untimely.

1 Accordingly, the application is hereby DISMISSED for lack

of jurisdiction.

1 Blocker attempted to file his application earlier, but the Court was unable to

accept the filing since it did not include either payment of costs, a pauper’s affidavit,

or a certificate of service. See OCGA § 5-6-4 (court prohibited from receiving

application for appeal unless costs paid or pauper’s affidavit is filed); Court of

Appeals Rule 6 (any document without a certificate of service shall not be accepted

for filing).

September 08, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/08/2015
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Knot, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard Szefc, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|





/s/
          Richard SzefcRichard SzefcChief Financial
          Officer


Date: August 8, 2007

---