alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 12.12 What about self-determination?

The regulations in this part are not intended to discourage contracting of Indian country law enforcement programs under the Indian Self-determination and Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93-638, as amended, 25 U.S.C. 450). The Deputy Commissioner of Indian Affairs will ensure minimum standards are maintained in high risk activities where the Federal government retains liability and the responsibility for settling tort claims arising from contracted law enforcement programs. It is not fair to law abiding citizens of Indian country to have anything less than a professional law enforcement program in their community. Indian country law enforcement programs that receive Federal funding and/or commissioning will be subject to a periodic inspection or evaluation to provide technical assistance, to ensure compliance with minimum Federal standards, and to identify necessary changes or improvements to BIA policies.
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.138 What must the Secretary do if a Tribe's noncompliance has caused imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset? If the Secretary finds that a Tribe's noncompliance with a Federal law or the terms of a TERA has caused imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset, the Secretary must: ( a ) Immediately notify the Tribe by a telephone call to the Designated Tribal Official followed by a written notice by facsimile to the Designated Tribal Official and the Tribal governing body of the imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset. The notice must contain: ( 1 ) A description of the Tribe's noncompliance with Federal law or the terms of the TERA;
( 2 ) A description of the physical trust asset and the nature of the imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset resulting from the Tribe's noncompliance; and
( 3 ) An order to the Tribe to cease specific conduct or take specific action deemed necessary by the Secretary to correct any condition that caused the imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset.
( b ) Issue a finding that the Tribe's noncompliance with the TERA or a Federal law has caused imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset.
EXHIBIT 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Eyal Bigon, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of InkSure Technologies Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  November 9, 2005


/s/ Eyal Bigon
--------------
Eyal Bigon
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
### §713. State Department: assignment or detail as couriers and building inspectors

(a) Upon the request of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of a military department may assign or detail members of the armed forces under his jurisdiction for duty—

(1) as inspectors of buildings owned or occupied abroad by the United States;

(2) as inspectors or supervisors of buildings under construction or repair abroad by or for the United States; and

(3) as couriers of the Department of State.

(b) The Secretary concerned may assign or detail a member for duty under subsection (a) with or without reimbursement from the Department of State. However, a member so assigned or detailed may be paid the traveling expenses authorized for officers of the Foreign Service of the United States. These expenses shall be paid from appropriations of the Department of State.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 33.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 713(a) | 22:956 (words before semicolon of 1st sentence). | Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, §561, 60 Stat. 1011. |
| 713(b) | 22:956 (less words before semicolon of 1st sentence). | |

In subsection (a), the words "members of the armed forces under his jurisdiction" are substituted for the words "military and naval personnel serving under their supervision".

In subsection (b), the words "The Secretary concerned may" are substituted for the words "in the discretion of the head of the department concerned".
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Final Rules (Other Than Interest Rate Updates) With Assoc... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Final Rules (Other Than Interest Rate Updates) with Associated Proposed Rules

How to View PDF Files
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  ERISA Section 4050 Mortality Table For 2014 Valuation Dates 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# ERISA Section 4050 Mortality Table for 2014 Valuation Dates

This mortality table is used as part of the "missing participant annuity assumptions" as discussed in 29 CFR 4050.  This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

November 29, 2018

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of D.M., a child, * From the 326th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 7963-CX.

No. 11-16-00225-CV * January 20, 2017

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
#### § 135.6 Refusal of water delivery.

The right is reserved to the United States to refuse the delivery of water to each of the said Irrigation Districts in the event of default in the payment of assessments, including penalties on account of delinquencies.
### §20211. Convening of selection boards

(a) In General.—Whenever the needs of the service require, the Secretary of the Air Force shall convene selection boards to recommend for promotion to the next higher permanent grade officers of the Space Force in each permanent grade from first lieutenant through brigadier general.

(b) Exception for Officers in Grade of First Lieutenant.—Subsection (a) does not require the convening of a selection board in the case of Space Force officers in the permanent grade of first lieutenant when the Secretary of the Air Force recommends for promotion to the grade of captain under section 20238(a)(4)(A) 1 of this title all such officers whom the Secretary finds to be fully qualified for promotion.

(c) Selection Boards for Early Retirement or Discharge.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convene selection boards to recommend officers for early retirement under section 20404(a) of this title or for discharge under section 20404(b) of this title.

(d) Regulations.—The convening of selection boards under subsection (a) shall be under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1716(c), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 634.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 20238(a) of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), does not contain a par. (4). However, section 20239(c) of this title relates to promotion of first lieutenants on an all-fully-qualified officers list and does contain a par. (4) defining such a list and containing subpars. (A) and (B).

1 See References in Text note below.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

** **

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

** **

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C****'1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.'1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of The RiceX Company (the“Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  May 15, 2003 | /s/ Daniel L. McPeak,  Sr. |   |
|---------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                      | Daniel L. McPeak, Sr.      |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer    |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to The RiceX Company, and will be retained byThe RiceX Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

This certification “accompanies” the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SecuritiesExchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof the company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing).

 

1

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  New To PBGC 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# New To PBGC

Welcome to PBGC! If you recently received a letter telling you that PBGC is now responsible for paying your pension benefit, this page is your gateway to PBGC. Your pension benefit is safe and secure. You are our customer, and we look forward to serving you. If you are currently receiving a pension benefit, your payments will continue without interruption. If you are not yet receiving a pension benefit, we will begin paying you as soon as you are eligible and apply to receive your pension benefit.

## Frequently Asked Questions

Do you have questions about PBGC and what we do? You can find the answers to our most frequently asked questions here.

## Your Guaranteed Pension

PBGC insures certain defined benefit pension plans through separate single-employer and multiemployer programs.

## Did Your Pension Plan Fail?

What do I do if my employer's pension plan administrator notified me in writing that my plan is ending?

## Is Your Plan Insured by PBGC?

Jump straight to our search of Plans Paying PBGC Premiums! PBGC insures most single-employer plans. Just enter the name of your company or your plan sponsor.

## Annual Funding Notice

You may have recently received an Annual Funding Notice about your defined benefit pension plan. The notice does not mean your pension plan is ending.

## Guaranteed Benefits

PBGC guarantees the "basic benefits" you earned before your single-employer pension plan’s termination date, known as guarantee limits.

## Multiemployer Plans

A multiemployer plan is a collectively bargained plan between more than one employer, often within the same or related industries, and a labor union.

## Annuity or Lump Sum

Many people with retirement plans are asked to choose between receiving lifetime income (an annuity) or a lump-sum payment to pay for day-to-day life.

## What is a Pension?

To most people, a pension is an arrangement in which your employer promises you a regular payment from the day you retire, for as long as you live.
### §7596. Provision of goods and services at Kwajalein Atoll

(a) Authority.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary of the Army, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may provide goods and services, including interatoll transportation, to the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and other eligible patrons, as determined by the Secretary of the Army, at Kwajalein Atoll.

(2) The Secretary of the Army may not provide goods or services under this section if doing so would be inconsistent, as determined by the Secretary of State, with the Compact of Free Association between the Government of the United States and the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands or any subsidiary agreement or implementing arrangement.

(b) Reimbursement.—(1) The Secretary of the Army may collect reimbursement from the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and eligible patrons for the provision of goods or services under subsection (a).

(2) The amount collected for goods or services under this subsection may not be greater than the total amount of actual costs to the United States for providing the goods or services.

(c) Necessary Expenses.—Amounts appropriated to the Department of the Army may be used for necessary expenses associated with providing goods and services under this section.

(d) Regulations.—The Secretary of the Army shall issue regulations to carry out this section.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XII, §1299A(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3997.)

#### References in Text

The Compact of Free Association between the Government of the United States and the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), probably means the Compact of Free Association between the Government of the United States and the Governments of the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia, which is contained in section 201 of Pub. L. 99–239, set out as a note under section 1901 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
#### § 273.144 Can Johnson-O'Malley funds be used for capital outlay or debt retirement?

In no instance may contract funds provided under this part be used as payment for capital outlay or debt retirement expenses; except that, such costs are allowable if they are considered to be a part of the full per capita cost of educating eligible Indian students who reside in Federal boarding facilities for the purpose of attending public schools.
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.12 Designated tribal agent for service of notice.

Any Indian tribe entitled to notice pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 1912 may designate by resolution, or by such other form as the tribe's constitution or current practice requires, an agent for service of notice other than the tribal chairman and send a copy of the designation to the Secretary or his/her designee. The Secretary or his/her designee shall update and publish as necessary the names and addresses of the designated agents in the Federal Register. A current listing of such agents shall be available through the area offices.
#### § 502.26 Tribal Gaming Regulatory Authority (TGRA).

*Tribal Gaming Regulatory Authority* (TGRA) means the entity authorized by Tribal law to regulate gaming conducted pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

[88 FR 55371, Aug. 15, 2023]
Exhibit 34.5






Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined management’s
assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.
(the “Company”), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for
which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the
year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by
it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was
conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior
to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period
covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s
assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December
31, 2015 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service
provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

February 4, 2016







PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 
75201 T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991,www.pwc.com/us
#### § 1000.61 Are other funds available to self-governance Tribes/Consortia for planning and negotiating with non-BIA bureaus?

Yes, Tribes/Consortia may contact OSG to determine if OSG has funds available for the purpose of planning and negotiating with non-BIA bureaus under this subpart. A Tribe/Consortium may also ask a non-BIA bureau for information on any funds that may be available from that bureau.
§ 170.513 When and how are bridge inspections performed? ( a ) All bridges identified on the NTTFI must be inspected under 23 U.S.C. 144.
( b ) Employees performing inspections as required by § 170.513(a) must: ( 1 ) Notify affected Tribes and State and local governments that an inspection will occur;
( 2 ) Offer Tribal and State and local governments the opportunity to accompany the inspectors; and
( 3 ) Otherwise coordinate with Tribal and State and local governments.
( c ) The person responsible for the bridge inspection team must meet the qualifications for bridge inspectors as defined in 23 U.S.C. 144.
# C_2006178EN.01001001.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/10

---

Judgement of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 June 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-207/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Second subparagraph of Article 88(2) EC - Aid incompatible with the common market - Duty to recover - Non-fulfilment)

(2006/C 178/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci and L. Pignataro, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia, Agent, assisted by M. Fiorilli, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Articles 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding [C-27/99 (ex NN 69/98)] (OJ L 77,2003, p. 21) — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the necessary measures to recover aid declared incompatible with the common market

Operative part of the judgement

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the necessary measures to recover aid declared unlawful land incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 4 of that decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the necessary measures to recover aid declared unlawful land incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 4 of that decision.

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.

1

---