alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, David Guthrie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. for the
period ending March 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 21, 2004

/s/David Guthrie
David Guthrie, President (Principal Executive Officer)
### §995. Accountability for contractors using military working dogs

(a) Annual Reporting Requirement for Contractors.—Each covered contract shall specify that the contractor is required to submit to the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), on an annual basis for the duration of the covered contract, a report containing an identification of—

(1) the number of military working dogs that are in the possession of the covered contractor and located outside of the continental United States in support of a military operation, if any; and

(2) the primary location of any such military working dogs.

(b) Covered Contract Defined.—In this section the term "covered contract" means a contract that the Secretary of Defense determines involves military working dogs.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title III, §382(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2543.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title III, §382(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2543, provided that: "Section 995 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to a contract entered into on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2022]."

#### Deadline for Guidance

Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title III, §382(d), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2543, provided that: "Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2022], the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall issue the guidance on the annual reporting requirement under section 995 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)."
### [§744. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(i)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2103]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 34, related to assignment and grade of physician to the White House.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 10043)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Initial Review Group, Minority Programs Review Subcommittee B.                    

*Date:*                         March 10, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20814 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rebecca H. Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN18C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2771,                         *johnsonrh@nigms.nih.gov.*

 (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 15, 2011.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-4017 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UAVSA Release 1.3



# Equipment Checklist

A. Aircraft

i. Travel case

ii. Log book

iii. 2 camera mounting

screws

iv. 2 battery trays

B. Batteries

i. Flight batteries

ii. Video transmitter

batteries

iii. Velcro

C. Camera

i. Travel Case

ii. Batteries

iii. Charger

iv. Lens cap

v. Lens

vi. Cleaning Cloths

vii. Dust Blaster

viii. Filters

ix. SD cards

D. Ground stations

i. Monitors

ii. Tripods

iii. Antennas

iv. Batteries

v. Battery adapter cables

E. Radios

i. Travel case

ii. Batteries

iii. Charger

F. Charger

i. Power supply

ii. Power supply cable

iii. Charger

iv. Balance boards

v. Battery adapters G. Laptop

i. Power supply

H. Spare parts

i. Propellers

ii. Zip ties

iii. Super glue

iv. Double

- sided tape

v. Boom locks

vi. Velcro

I. Tools

i. Battery voltage checkers

ii. Tool kit

iii. Scissors

iv. Allen wrenches

v. Infrared thermometer

vi. Soldering iron

vii. Solder

viii. Shrink tube
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00362

- CV

DONALD CROW

, Appellant

v.

GATEWAY FOUNDATION, INC, RANDALL

MCLAURIN, AND ANDREA CANUL

, Appellee s

From the 278th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1627841

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Donald Crow filed a notice of appeal on November 26, 2018. By letter dated

November 29, 2018, this Court notified Crow that the appeal was subject to dismissal

because the notice of appeal was untimely. The Clerk also warned Crow that the appeal

would b e dismissed unless, within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed

showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 44.3. Crow did not file a

response.Cro w v. Gateway Foundation, Inc. Page 2

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 2, 2019

[CV06]
U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

To Whom It May Concern, 

Comments to DOT in respect of Resolution 787 

SAS wish to make the following remarks in respect of the filing by IATA of Resolution 787, which we would 

wish the Department to take into consideration; 

Airlines are currently unable to deliver their full product offerings to consumers through the indirect 

channel today because the GDS network is based on data transmission.

Today’s GDS distribution network was developed more than 40 years ago before the Internet offered 

the ability to widely distribute airline tickets. The Internet and modern data processing capabilities allow 

airlines to now distribute their products directly to consumers without filing with third parties. The airline 

industry would never have developed the current GDS distribution network if the Internet existed at the 

time. 

An updated data transmission standard based on XML will make it easier, faster and cheaper to provide 

the customer more information about fare alternatives, ancillary services and on board amenities.

Today, airlines are using the Internet to make dynamic offers directly to airline customers through their 

websites. Airlines are increasingly choosing this distribution method because it allows them to display 

their complete offers and better tailor those offers to meet the stated needs of the particular customer.

Adoption of the data transmission standard envisioned by Resolution 787 by the industry will allow for 

more competition in the distribution of airline tickets. Having a common XML based standard will enable 

developers to offer more efficient ways to distribute airline tickets and provide the consumers with the 

information they need on complete airline offers to make an informed choice that meets their particular 

needs. 

The GDS incumbents are seeking to protect their investment in an antiquated network that does not 

meet the needs of today’s air traveler. They are also using their market power to suppress competition in 

the indirect distribution channel. The U.S. Justice Department has an active investigation into the 

anticompetitive business practices of the GDSs in the United States. 
If adopted widely, NDC will result in airlines having to compete directly with one another on service 

offerings as well as price. Consumers will be able to pick what they want in an airline offer through a 

menu of options, which can then be compared to similar offers by other airlines. Competition normally 

results in lower prices and better customer service.

To summarize, we are convinced that NDC will be of value to customers, airlines, the communities we 

serve and ultimately to the wider economy.

Yours sincerely

Hans Ollongren

Senior Vice President

SAS Group
Exhibit 99.7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Scott Burrows, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of the operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date:  February 25, 2016 |                       
|------------------------ | ----------------------
|                         |                       
|                         | /s/ "J. Scott Burrows"
|                         | Name:                 
|                         | Title:
#### § 216.11 Appeals.

An applicant, permittee, lessee, or lessor aggrieved by a decision or order of a mining supervisor or superintendent may appeal such decision or order. An appeal from a decision or order of a superintendent shall be made pursuant to 25 CFR part 2. An appeal from a decision or order of a mining supervisor shall be made pursuant to 30 CFR parts 211 and 231.
[Cite as State v. Day , 2021-Ohio-543.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

PREBLE COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, Appellee,

- vs -

PRESTON TYLER DAY, Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA2020-06-010

D E C I S I O N 3/1/2021

APPEAL FROM PREBLE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. 18CR12706

Martin P. Votel, Preble County Prosecuting Attorney, Kathryn We st, 101 East Main Street, Courthouse, First Floor, Eaton, Ohio 45320, for appellee Valerie Sargent-Wood Law, LLC, Valerie Sargent-Wood, 204 North Barron Street, Suite C, Eaton, Ohio 45320, for appellant

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal fil ed by appellant, Preston Tyler Day, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Preble County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.Preble CA2020-06-010 {¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any err ors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record i ndependently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and wit hout infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to w ithdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellan t. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no res ponse having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal i s dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER, P.J., HENDRICKSON and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

Section 906 Certification

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the sole general partner of Host Hotels &
Resorts, L.P., (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the period ended September 8, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 16, 2006



/s/ Christopher J. NassettaChristopher J. NassettaChief Executive Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc./s/ W. Edward WalterW. Edward WalterChief Financial Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 374

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 16, 1999.

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on or before the legislative day of Wednesday, November 17, 1999,

for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules,

provided that the object of any such motion is announced

from the floor at least one hour before the motion is offered.

In scheduling the consideration of legislation under this authority, the Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee.

SEC. 2. Provides that House Resolution 342 is laid on

the table.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 448

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in continued sympathy

for the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing on the occasion of the

5th anniversary of the bombing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 2000

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in

continued sympathy for the victims of the Oklahoma

City bombing on the occasion of the 5th anniversary

of the bombing.

Whereas on April 19, 1995, as the result of an act of terrorism, a bomb exploded in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma,

collapsing the north face of the 9-story Alfred P. Murrah

Federal Building;

Whereas April 19, 2000, marks the 5th anniversary of this

tragic event;

Whereas the explosion killed more than 168 people, including

19 children, and injured more than 700 others in the Al-
2

•HRES 448 IH

fred P. Murrah Federal Building and in and around surrounding buildings;

Whereas the explosion destroyed a childcare facility located in

the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, killing 15 children;

Whereas 320 surrounding buildings were impacted from the

explosion;

Whereas flying glass and debris from the explosion were a

major cause of injury; and

Whereas greater awareness and sensitivity to the safe design

and operation of buildings could help make the people

who live and work in and around the buildings safer:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the countless acts of goodwill by

3 the thousands of volunteers (including those who do4 nated goods and services), rescue workers, and Fed5 eral, State, and local officials who assisted in the

6 rescue and recovery efforts following the bombing in

7 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on April 19, 1995;

8 (2) sends continued condolences to the families,

9 friends, and loved ones who still suffer from the con10 sequences of the bombing;

11 (3) pledges to make Federal buildings safer,

12 while still maintaining a level of openness to the citi13 zens served by the buildings;
3

•HRES 448 IH

1 (4) pledges to create an awareness of the dan2 gers of flying glass and debris resulting from an act

3 of terrorism, an explosion, or a natural disaster; and

4 (5) pledges to support efforts to make buildings

5 more secure for people from flying glass and debris

6 and to promote the use of available technology to

7 protect people from such glass and debris.

Æ
Exhibit 35.5



|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                          
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 9062 Old Annapolis
Road Columbia, Maryland 21045

Citibank N.A.

17g-5 Information
Provider

ratingagencynotice@citi.com

RE: Annual Statement
as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), as Master Servicer,
hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period):

(a) a review of Wells
Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement listed on Schedule A hereto (the Servicing Agreement) has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period, except as described on Schedule B hereto.

February 27, 2014



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
|Kristen Ann Cronin    
|Vice President        
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



|                       |  |  |  |     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |  |  | LOGO



---

Schedule A

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012, for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-2, by and among Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc., as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. 1



|1 | The Pooling and Servicing Agreement was amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 to reflect the resignation of Wells Fargo as the Securities Administrator and Paying Agent (among other roles). See the Form
8-K filed on January 6, 2014 for additional information.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2



---

Schedule B

None



3