alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of UCBH Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated: November 8, 2004
    
    /s/ Thomas S. WuThomas S. WuChairman, President andChief Executive OfficerDated: November 8, 2004
    
    /s/ Jonathan H. DowningJonathan H. DowningExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to UCBH Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by UCBH Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2773a. Departmental accountable officials

(a) Designation by Secretary of Defense.—The Secretary of Defense may designate any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or member of the armed forces under the Secretary's jurisdiction who is described in subsection (b) as an employee or member who, in addition to any other potential accountability, may be held accountable through personal monetary liability for an illegal, improper, or incorrect payment made by the Department of Defense described in subsection (c). Any such designation shall be in writing. Any employee or member who is so designated may be referred to as a "departmental accountable official".

(b) Covered Employees and Members.—An employee or member of the armed forces described in this subsection is an employee or member who—

(1) is responsible in the performance of the employee's or member's duties for providing to a certifying official of the Department of Defense information, data, or services that are directly relied upon by the certifying official in the certification of vouchers for payment; and

(2) is not otherwise accountable under subtitle III of title 31 or any other provision of law for payments made on the basis of such vouchers.

(c) Pecuniary Liability.—(1) The Secretary of Defense may subject a departmental accountable official to pecuniary liability for an illegal, improper, or incorrect payment made by the Department of Defense if the Secretary determines that such payment—

(A) resulted from information, data, or services that that official provided to a certifying official and upon which that certifying official directly relies in certifying the voucher supporting that payment; and

(B) was the result of fault or negligence on the part of that departmental accountable official.

(2) Pecuniary liability under this subsection shall apply in the same manner and to the same extent as applies to an official accountable under subtitle III of title 31.

(3) Any pecuniary liability of a departmental accountable official under this subsection for a loss to the United States resulting from an illegal, improper, or incorrect payment is joint and several with that of any other officer or employee of the United States or member of the uniformed services who is pecuniarily liable for such loss.

(d) Certifying Official Defined.—In this section, the term "certifying official" means an employee who has the responsibilities specified in section 3528(a) of title 31.

(Added Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title X, §1005(a), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2631; amended Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1056(c)(8), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3440.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–163 inserted "by" after "incorrect payment made".
#### § 227.15 Manner of payment.

All payments due the lessor shall be made to the superintendent for the benefit of the Shoshone Indian Tribe, in accordance with the act of August 21, 1916 (39 Stat. 519), and no credit will be given any lessee for payments made otherwise. Payments of rentals and royalties except the first year's rental, which shall be paid to the superintendent as prescribed in § 227.4 shall be transmitted to the superintendent through the supervisor. All such payments shall be accompanied by a statement, in triplicate, by the lessee, showing the specific items of royalty or rental that the remittance is intended to cover, and payment of royalties on production shall be made not later than the last day of the calendar month following the production for which such payment is to be made.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18416-18417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06795]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 226, Audio Systems and 
Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 226, Audio Systems and 
Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
sixth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 226, Audio Systems and 
Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 15-17, 2013 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1150 18th Street NW., 
Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org. In addition, Sophie Bouquet may be contacted directly at 
(202) 330-0663, email: sbousquet@rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 226. The agenda will 
include the following:

 Welcome and Administrative Remarks
 Introductions
 Agenda Overview
 Review meeting minutes from January Working Group Meeting
 Comment period related to any actions taken at January Working 
Group Meeting
 Review previous action items
 Solicit proposals for further changes to DO-214
 Continue discussion on the following:

    (a) A consistent method for testing of ANR headsets
    (b) A consistent method for testing of Oxygen Mask Microphones
    (c) Impedance to be used for headset standard
    (d) Additional tests required for

[[Page 18417]]

powered headsets
    (e) RF susceptibility issues
 Continue review of DO-214 and draft updates & changes since 
last meeting
 Other Business
 Review open actions
 Establish agenda for next meeting & discuss actions to reach
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 15, 2013.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-06795 Filed 3-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
### §898. Art. 98. Misconduct as prisoner

Any person subject to this chapter who, while in the hands of the enemy in time of war—

(1) for the purpose of securing favorable treatment by his captors acts without proper authority in a manner contrary to law, custom, or regulation, to the detriment of others of whatever nationality held by the enemy as civilian or military prisoners; or

(2) while in a position of authority over such persons maltreats them without justifiable cause;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 71, §905; renumbered §898, Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5401(6), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2938.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 905 | 50:699. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 105), 64 Stat. 138. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 898 was renumbered section 931f of this title.

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 renumbered section 905 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
### §721. Authorization to operate business

The court may authorize the trustee to operate the business of the debtor for a limited period, if such operation is in the best interest of the estate and consistent with the orderly liquidation of the estate.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2606.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

This section is derived from section 2a(5) of the Bankruptcy Act [section 11(a)(5) of former title 11]. It permits the court to authorize the operation of any business of the debtor for a limited period, if the operation is in the best interest of the estate and consistent with orderly liquidation of the estate. An example is the operation of a watch company to convert watch movements and cases into completed watches which will bring much higher prices than the component parts would have brought.
### §1128. Confirmation hearing

(a) After notice, the court shall hold a hearing on confirmation of a plan.

(b) A party in interest may object to confirmation of a plan.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2635.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### senate report no. 95–989

[Section 1129 (enacted as section 1128)] Subsection (a) requires that there be a hearing in every case on the confirmation of the plan. Notice is required.

Subsection (b) permits any party in interest to object to the confirmation of the plan. The Securities and Exchange Commission and indenture trustees, as parties in interest under section 1109, may object to confirmation of the plan.
### **CHAPTER 812—GRADE AND RANK OF OFFICERS**

Sec.
8111.
Navy: grades above chief warrant officer, W–⁠5.
8112.
Marine Corps: grades above chief warrant officer, W–⁠5.
8113.
Navy and Marine Corps: warrant officer grades.
8118.
Rank of line and staff corps officers of the Navy and officers of the Marine Corps.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(e)(2)(B), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837, 1838, redesignated chapter 535 of this title as this chapter and items 5501 to 5503 and 5508 as 8111 to 8113 and 8118, respectively.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1673(d)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3016, struck out item 5506 "Naval Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve; officers: precedence".

**1991**—Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title XI, §1131(8)(B), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1506, substituted "W–⁠5" for "W–4" in items 5501 and 5502.

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §§503(25), 513(10), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2913, 2932, struck out items 5504 "Lineal lists: maintenance", 5505 "Reserve officers: change of lineal position", and 5507 "Rear admirals: determination of upper half".

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–861, §1(114)(B), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1493, added item 5506.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the Quarterly Report of Quicksilver Resources
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Glenn Darden, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Bill Lamkin, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each here certifies that, to his knowledge on the date thereof:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 10, 2005



|    |  |                                                      |  |     |  |                                      
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Bill Lamkin                                      |  | By: |  | /s/ Glenn Darden                     
|    |  | Bill Lamkin                                          |  |     |  | Glenn Darden                         
|    |  | Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Joseph H. Harkow, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment of the'Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Holding Corp.
("Holding") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Patrick G. Yount, Chief Financial Officer of Holding, certify, to
my knowledge, that:

         1.       The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Patrick G. Yount
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Patrick G. Yount
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                                        November 14, 2003
#### W. T. Freeland v. Oscar Hughes.

The decision in this case is controlled by the opinion rendered in the former hearing thereof and reported in volume 109 111. App. 73.

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Moultrie County; the Hon. W. C. Johns, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the November term, 1904.

Reversed with finding of facts.

Opinion filed April 20, 1905.

Harbaugh & Thompson, for appellant.

E. J. Miller, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Puterbaugh

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit by appellee against appellant to recover commissions alleged to be due him for the sale of certain real estate. He recovered judgment in the Circuit Court for $174, from which the defendant appeals.

Upon a former trial of the cause plaintiff recovered a judgment for a like sum, which, upon appeal to this court, was reversed and the cause remanded because of the giving by the trial court of an erroneous instruction. Freeland v. Hughes, 109 App. 73. We have carefully read and considered the evidence and are constrained to adhere to the conclusion as to the facts involved, expressed in our former opinion, and now hold that the greater weight of the evidence clearly establishes the fact that appellee’s *110authority to sell the land was revoked before the alleged sale to Wiley was finally effected. We are further of opinion that the letter from appellant to appellee, designated-as “Exhibit 2” and written after such revocation, did not constitute an acceptance by the former of the latter’s services in selling the land to Wiley, nor a ratification of such sale. The cause has been thrice tried in the Circuit Court and appellee has had ample opportunity to establish his alleged right of action. We have twice held that the evidence adduced by him was insufficient for that purpose. It is time that the litigation should end.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore reversed without remanding.

*Reversed.*

Finding of facts, to be incorporated in the judgment of the court:

We find that the employment of appellee by appellant was ended and his authority to sell the land in question revoked by appellant prior to the sale of the same to Wiley; that such employment and authority were not subsequently renewed, and that the subsequent sale to Wiley was not ratified by appellant.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 551

Supporting the national motto of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 2000

Mr. SHOWS (for himself, Mr. COBURN, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. LARGENT, Mr.

STENHOLM, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. DEMINT, Mr.

HOSTETTLER, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. PITTS, Mr. SOUDER, and

Mr. LIPINSKI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Supporting the national motto of the United States.

Whereas the national motto of the United States is ‘‘In God

we trust’’;

Whereas the national motto was adopted in 1956 and is codified in the laws of the United States at section 302 of

title 36, United States Code;

Whereas the national motto reflects the traditional sentiment

that we are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being;

Whereas the sentiment ‘‘In God we trust’’ is deeply interwoven into the fabric of our civil polity;

Whereas the content of the motto is as old as the Republic

itself and has always been as integral a part of the first
2

•HRES 551 IH

amendment as the very words of that charter of religious

liberty;

Whereas the Founding Fathers believed devotedly that there

was a God and that the unalienable rights of man were

rooted in Him, a belief clearly evidenced in their writings,

from the Mayflower Compact to the Constitution itself;

Whereas our national life reflects a religious people who earnestly pray that the Supreme Lawgiver guide them in

every measure which may be worthy of His blessing;

Whereas the national motto serves the secular purpose of expressing confidence in the future and encouraging the

recognition of what is worthy of appreciation in society;

Whereas the national motto appears on all coins and currency

issued by the United States Government; and

Whereas the words ‘‘In God We Trust’’ appear over the entrance to the Chamber of the Senate and are prominently

engraved in the wall above the Speaker’s dais in the

Chamber of the House of Representatives: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) finds repugnant all misinterpretations and

3 misapplications of the Constitution that disregard

4 those references to God that are well within the

5 American tradition and outside constitutional pro6 scription;

7 (2) finds that acknowledgment of our need for

8 the superintending care of the Supreme Being does

9 not intrude upon the freedom of conscience;
3

•HRES 551 IH

1 (3) rejects the notion that the laws and Con2 stitution of this Nation require the exclusion of God

3 from matters of government and public life;

4 (4) supports and encourages the public display

5 of the national motto in all public buildings, public

6 schools, and other government institutions estab7 lished or maintained at taxpayer expense; and

8 (5) affirms its support for the national motto.

Æ
H. Res. 527

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 20, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

4201) to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to clarify

the service obligations of noncommercial educational broadcast stations. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on

Commerce now printed in the bill shall be considered as

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except:

(1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Commerce; (2) a further

amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII, if offered by representative Markey of Massachusetts or his designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled
2

•HRES 527 EH

by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

House Calendar No. 137

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 337

[Report No. 106–407]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2466) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 20, 1999

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2466) making appropriations

for the Department of the Interior and related agencies

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2466) making appropriations for

4 the Department of the Interior and related agencies for
2

HRES 337 RH

1 the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other

2 purposes. All points of order against the conference report

3 and against its consideration are waived. The conference

4 report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 137

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 337

[Report No. 106–407]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2466) making

appropriations for the Department of the Interiorand related agencies for the fiscal year endingSeptember 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

OCTOBER 20, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed