September 2, 2015

Exemption No. 12718

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2069

Mr. Russell E. Medley

General Manager

Iris Magic Photo Studios LLC and Iris Magic Media LLC

1042 Suncrest Town Centre

Morgantown, WV 26505

Dear Mr. Medley:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

By letter dated May 20, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Iris Magic Photo Studios LLC and Iris Magic Media LLC for an exemption. The 

petitioner requested to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial 

photography, videography, cinematography, and motion picture productions.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Inspire 1 and DJI Spreading Wings S1000+.
2

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products 

and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates. In accordance with the statutory criteria 

provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in 

consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft 

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from 

14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness 

Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is 

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection1and closed set motion picture and 

filming. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material 

respects to those presented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus 

Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 

11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the 

enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described 

by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of 

significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA 

good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, Iris Magic Photo Studios LLC and Iris Magic Media 

LLC are granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 

61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to 

 

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. 

Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF 

analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by 

instruments aboard the UA.
3

operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection and closed set motion picture and filming. 

This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Iris Magic Photo Studios LLC and Iris Magic Media LLC are

hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Inspire 1 and 

DJI Spreading Wings S1000+ when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. 

Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to 

amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are

permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC 

must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 
4

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update 

or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then 

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s 

UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding 

updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g., inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 
5

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 
6

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 
7

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.
8

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

U.S. Department Of Transportation

Docket Management System 

12000 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

From: 

Iris Magic Photo Studios LLC & Iris Magic Media LLC 

Russell E. Medley III 

1042 Suncrest Town Centre 

Morgantown, WV 26505 

Office: 304.241.5562 

Mobile: 304.777.8408 

Email: emery@irismagic.com

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations from: 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. Part 21;14 C.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 

91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.105; 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 

91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (2); 91.417(a)&(b)

Dear Sir or Ma’am, 

I, Russell E. Medley on behalf of Iris Magic Media LLC, herewith known as the 

petitioner, am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 

the procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that I, an owner and operator 

of small unmanned aircraft, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations 

(“FARs”) listed below so that I may operate my small ultra light weight unmanned 

aircraft system (“sUAS”) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation 

Administration (“FAA”). 

The petitioner has over 7 years operating UA as a hobby, enthusiast, and for IrisMagic 

Media LLC. While at Norfolk State University, I received 6 credit hours in Airway 

Science. While in the U.S. Army, I received Certification as an Aerial Delivery and 

Materials Officer at Fort Lee, VA, and obtained The Parachute Rigger Badge also at 

Fort Lee,Va. I have experience flying RC aircraft and in particular have been flying RC 

quadcopter for over three and a half years and other RC aircraft prior to that. I have 

over 300 hours experience flying RC quadcopters of the type referenced in this 

document.

The petitioner has in his possession two semi professional grade quadcopters sUAS 

with an integrated 4k still/video camera system with intent for aerial videography/

cinematography to enhance academic community awareness, produce wedding films 

and videos, sports photography, music and motion picture productions and other flight 

operations, following exemption and approval by the FAA. The petitioner has instilled 

safety protocols and controls to avoid and prevent public hazard. The petitioner believes 

that his background in airway science and years of producing wedding and sports films, 

professional videography can assist the FAA in developing operational and safety 
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

protocols for lightweight UAS's as their integration into the national airspace system is 

explored and developed. 

I and on behalf of Iris Magic Media LLC, I am interested in operating small unmanned 

aircraft systems (sUAS) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) for the purposes of aerial photography, videography/

cinematography and other responsible flight operations that could be performed safely 

and more cost effectively with the use of a small sUAS at low altitude within the U.S. 

national airspace system as compared to a manned aircraft. Commercial operations will 

be performed only at the request of and with the authorization and permission of clients, 

communities or their authorized agents in order to facilitate commerce and raise 

awareness of the responsible and beneficial uses of small unmanned air systems. So 

long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein 

or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

Granting my request comports with the Secretary of Transportation’s (FAA 

Administrator’s) responsibilities and authority to not only integrate UAS's into the 

national airspace system, but to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of such 

aircraft systems [UAS's] in the national airspace system” under Section 333(c) of the 

Reform Act specific to the use of UAS's for real estate and other community related 

purposes. Further I will conduct my operations in compliance with the protocols 

described herein or as otherwise established by the FAA.

For the reasons stated below the petitioner respectfully requests the grant of an 

exemption allowing me on behalf of Iris Magic Media LLC to operate ultra light weight, 

remote controlled UAS’s for the purpose of enhancing academic community awareness, 

producing wedding films and videos, sports photography, music and motion picture 

productions and other flight operations,
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

I. Contact Information: 

Iris Magic Photo Studios 

Russell E. Medley 

1042 Suncrest Town Centre DR 

Morgantown, WV 26505 

Office: 304.241.5562 

Mobile: 304.777.8408 

Email: emery@irismagic.com

II. The Specific Sections of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations From 

Which The Petitioner Requests Exemption are:

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 

14 C.F.R. 21; Subpart H 

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 

91.7(a); 

91.9(b) (2); 

91.103(b)(2); 

91.105; 

91.109; 

91.119; 

91.121; 

91.151(a); 

91.203(a)&(b); 

91.405(a); 

91.407(a) (1); 

91.409(a) (1) &(2); 

91.417(a)&(b) 

Aircraft markings 

Certification procedures; Airworthiness 

Certificates Pilots, Flight Instructors and 

Ground Instructors Airworthiness 

certificate 

Aircraft flight manual 

Preflight action 

Flight crew members at stations 

Flight instruction 

Minimum safe altitudes 

Altimeter settings 

Fuel requirements for flights in VFR 

conditions Aircraft certifications and 

registrations Maintenance required 

Operation after maintenance 

Inspections 

Maintenance records
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

III. The Extent Of Relief The Petitioner Seeks And The Reason He Seeks Such 

Relief:

These are in accordance with FAA Publication: Public Guidance for Petitions for 

Exemption Filed under Section 333 (Rev. 9/25/14). The petitioner submits this 

application in accordance with the Reform Act, 112 P.L. 95 §§ 331-334, seeking relief 

from any currently applicable FARs operating to prevent the petitioner from 

contemplated commercial videographic, academic and other flight operations within the 

national airspace system (NAS). The Reform Act in Section 332 provides for such 

integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into our national airspace system as it is 

in the public’s interest to do so. The petitioner’s ultra light weight sUAS meets the 

definition of “small unmanned aircraft” as defined in Section 331 and therefore the 

integration of my ultra lightweight sUAS is expressly contemplated by the Reform Act. I 

would like to operate my ultra lightweight sUAS’s prior to the time period by which the 

Reform Act requires the FAA to promulgate rules governing such craft. My airway 

science background and commercial videography background applied to UAS’s can 

provide direct experience and valuable information to develop requirements and 

protocols for formal regulation that can be administered regarding various applications 

related to UAS aerial video and photography. The Reform Act guides the Secretary in 

determining the types of UAS's that may operate safely in our national airspace system. 

Considerations include: The weight, size, 

speed and overall capabilities of the UAS's; Whether the UAS will be operated near 

airports or heavily populated areas; and, whether the UAS will be operated by line of 

sight. 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (a). Each of these items reflect in favor of an exemption for the 

petitioner. 

Similar exemptions to Gary, J Huett (No. 11595), Astraeus Aerial (No. 11062) and 

Douglas Trudeau (No. 11138), as well as others have been recently granted that cover 

the same relief from regulations as requested in this petition for exemption. The above 

two, amongst other, petitions have been reviewed with the petitioner’s exemption being 

substantially similar to that of Douglas Trudeau in use of the UAS for local community 

related matters rather than professional movie making.

A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and The 

Like.

14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for 

procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). 
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

The size, weight and enclosed operational area of the petitioners UAS permits 

exemption from Part 21 because the UAS meets (and exceeds) an equivalent level of 

safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt 

aircraft from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 

44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA 

to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the 

weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense 

populations. The petitioners UAS meets or exceeds each of the elements. 

14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness 

certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the 

FARs, this regulation is inapplicable. Proper maintenance will be regularly applied to 

keep the UAS airworthy.

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no 

on board pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS's, this Regulation is 

inapplicable. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a safety/flight 

manual as presented in this document delineating areas of where safety can be defined. 

The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 

8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 10700 and 32827.

14 C.F.R. § 91.121 regarding altimeter settings is inapplicable insofar as my UAS has 

no altimeter settings. It, however, utilizes electronic global positioning systems with a 

barometric sensor providing instantaneous telemetry to the PIC as to the altitude (AGL) 

of the UAS above the takeoff location.

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides for the carrying of civil aircraft certifications and 

registrations. They are inapplicable for the same reasons described above. The 

equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining any such required 

certifications and registrations by the petitioner.

B. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking of The Aircraft.

Applicable Codes of Federal Regulation require aircraft to be marked according to 

certain specifications. My UAS is, by definition, unmanned. It, therefore, does not have 

a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain words or phrases. Further, twoinch lettering is difficult to place on such small aircraft with dimensions smaller that 

minimal lettering requirement. Regardless, I will mark the UAS in the largest possible 

lettering by placing an N number registered with the FAA on its fuselage so that I the 

pilot, or anyone assisting me as a spotter with the UAV will see the markings. The FAA 

has previously issued exemptions to this regulation through Exemptions Nos. 8738, 

10167, 10167A and 10700.

C. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: PIC.

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b), private pilots are limited to non-commercial 

operations. The petitioner can achieve an equivalent level of safety as achieved by 
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

current regulations because my UAS does not carry any pilots or passengers. Further, 

while helpful, a commercial pilot license will not ensure remote control piloting skills. The 

PIC also possesses over 300 hours experience flying the UAS in a variety of locations 

and conditions. The risks attendant to the operation of my UAS are far less than the risk 

levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 C.F.R. § 61, et seq. Thus, 

allowing the petitioner, a licensed Private Pilot with a current Third Class Medical 

Certificate to operate my UAS commercially meeting and exceeding current safety 

levels in relation to 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b).

D. 14 C.F.R. 91.105: Flight Crew Members at Stations

Since there is no flight crew onboard the UAS, the above-cited regulation is 

inapplicable. However, in keeping with the direction of the regulation, the PIC of the 

UAS and VO will be at their respective crew member stations on the ground during 

takeoff and landing as well as the complete duration of the flight. 

E. 14 C.F.R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes.

14 C.F.R. § 91.119 prescribes safe altitudes for the operation of civil aircraft. It allows 

helicopters to be operated at lower altitudes in certain conditions. My UAS will never 

operate at an altitude greater than 400 feet AGL unless other altitude limits are 

forthcoming by the FAA. The petitioner will operate the UAS in a manner protecting the 

public and any consenting participants, providing a level of safety at least equivalent to 

or below those in relation to minimum safe altitudes. Given the size, weight, 

maneuverability and speed of my UAS, an equivalent or higher level of safety will be 

achieved.

F. 14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a)(1)&(2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance 

Inspections.

The above-cited Regulations require, amongst other things, aircraft owners and 

operators to “have [the] aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and 

shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, 

have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter. . . .” These 

Regulations only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. They will not, 

therefore, apply to the petitioners UAS. However, as a safety precaution I inspect my 

UAS regularly as well as before and after each flight and have a maintenance program 

that involves regular software updates and curative measures for any damaged 

hardware. Therefore, an equivalent level of safety will be achieved.

IV. How The Petitioners Request Will Benefit the Public As A Whole:

Aerial videography for weddings, community awareness, marketing, music videos, 

academic training, sports films, and other flight operations has been around for many 

years through manned fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. For small budget operations, 

local community awareness and the average business/homeowners, the expense and 
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

operation of such aerial videography can be both cost and logistically prohibitive. Only 

large companies, In addition, attempting to get still photos, much less high quality, 

stabilized video of a community, home, farm, or business is often logistically difficult or 

impossible using a full size aircraft or helicopter due to flight restrictions, ground 

proximity, trees and other hindrances, not to mention highly intrusive noise levels and 

other drawbacks to the neighboring community. Also, the physical logistics of 

maneuvering a full sized fixed wing aircraft or helicopter adds an element of risk and 

danger due to the possibility of crashing and ensuing fire. The proper use of an ultra 

lightweight, battery powered, GPS stabilized, UAS removes that element of danger, 

while at the same time making available the opportunity to acquire high quality images 

and video to the community at an economical cost. New perspectives and creative 

presentations of features of the community are made available that were not previously 

possible. This opens up a whole new economic avenue for community awareness, 

development and enhancement in many areas, some yet to be explored and 

discovered, similar to the advent of aviation. The lower cost and greater utility facilitates 

a whole new dimension to community related presentation options that were previously 

not available.

Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the public’s interest to integrate 

commercially flown UAS's into the national airspace system, hence the passing of the 

Reform Act. Granting the petitioners exemption request furthers the public interest 

through academic/visual awareness, decreased risk to the public and newly accessible 

scales of economy. Our ultra lightweight UASs are battery powered and creates no 

emissions that can harm the environment. The consequence of our ultra lightweight 

UASs crashing is far less than a full size helicopter or fixed wing aircraft; which are 

heavy, contain combustible fuel and can cause catastrophic devastation to the public. 

Due to their size, limited maneuverability, and flight limitations manned aircraft also 

cannot provide the community with the versatile, high quality, stabilized video/

cinematography that can be gained through the responsible operation of a small UAS. 

Some specific areas where the petitioner’s use of a UAS may benefit the public as a 

whole are: 

• Aerial videography/cinematography to enhance academic community awareness - 

community events, outdoor functions, business promotions, video productions 

• Other flight operations – other areas that may develop

The public’s interest is furthered by minimizing ecological and crash threat by permitting 

aerial video/photo capture through my battery operated ultra lightweight UAS. Permitting 

the petitioner to immediately fly within national air space stimulates economic growth in 

the community. In addition, due to my UAS and Airway experience, the petitioner can 

knowledgeably relate back to the FAA valuable input to establish requirements and 

protocols for the proper integration of UAS’s into the national airspace system.
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

V. Reasons Why Granting the Petitioners Exemption Will Not Adversely Affect 

Safety Or How The Exemption Will Provide a Level of Safety At Least Equal To 

Existing Rule:

The following information is provided for the FAA to effectively analyze the petitioner’s 

sUAS operation with regard to safety:

Our, Iris Magic Media LLC / Iris Magic Photo Studios LLC, exemption will not adversely 

affect safety. Quite the contrary, for the reasons stated permitting us, Iris Magic to log 

more flight time in FAA controlled airspace, with communication with the FAA, will allow 

us to contribute to the innovation and implementation of new and novel, as of yet 

undiscovered safety protocols for Wedding Photographers and Videographers. In 

addition We, Iris Magic, submit the following representations of enhancements to 

current aerial videography and photography:

• Our UAS weighs less than 15 pounds complete with gimbal and high resolution 

Panasonc GH4 Cameras and well factory mounted cameras; 

• We only operate our UAS below 300 feet (well within the 400 foot permissible ceiling 

set by the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012); 

• Our UAS only operate for 10-15 minutes per flight; 

• We land our UAS prior to manufacturer recommended minimum level of battery 

power; 

• We pilot our UAS through remote control only by line of sight; 

• Our UAS has GPS a flight safety feature whereby it hovers and then slowly lands 

• if communication with the remote control pilot is lost; 

• We actively analyze flight data and other sources of information to constantly update 

and enhance safety protocols; 

• We only operate in reasonably safe environment that are strictly controlled, are away 

from power lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas; 

• We conduct extensive pre-flight inspections and protocol, during which safety carries 

primary importance; 

• We always obtain all necessary permissions prior to operation; and, 

• We have procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches or 

potential danger.

The two UAS systems we use are manufactured by DJI (www.dji.com): 

-INSPIRE 1 & Spreading Wings S1000+ (equipped with panasonic gh4) 

http://www.dji.com/product/inspire-1

http://www.dji.com/product/spreading-wings-s1000-plus

VI. A Summary The FAA May Publish in the Federal Register:

14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and The Like. 14 

C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for 

procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). 

The size, weight and limited operational area of my UAS permits exemption from Part 
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

21 because the petitioner’s UAS meets an equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 

333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the airworthiness 

certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the 

Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from the 

airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed, 

maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense populations. My 

UAS meets or exceeds each of the elements. 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation 

of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable 

in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 

(b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no pilots or 

passengers, and given the size of the UAS's, this Regulation is inapplicable. An 

equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a manual. The FAA has 

previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 

9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 10700 and 32827. 14 C.F.R. § 

91.121 requires altimeter settings in the aircraft. Since there are no such settings 

possible and the UAS provides real- time GPS and barometric telemetry to the PIC, this 

regulation is inapplicable. 14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides for the carrying of civil 

aircraft certifications and registrations. This regulation is inapplicable as to the small size 

of the UAS, however, the petitioner will maintain any required certifications and 

registrations. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking of The Aircraft. Due to the small size of the 

UAS, two inch lettering is inapplicable. However, an N- number as large as possible, 

registered with the FAA will be put on the fuselage. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot 

Privileges and Limitations: PIC. The risks attendant to the operation of my UAS are far 

less than the risk levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 C.F.R. § 61, 

et seq. Thus, allowing the petitioner, a licensed Private Pilot with a current Third Class 

Medical Certificate to operate my UAS commercially meeting and exceeding current 

safety levels. 14 C.F.R. 91.105: Flight Crew Members at Stations. The PIC of the UAS 

and the VO will remain at their respective stations during takeoff and landing as well as 

the duration of the flight. 14 C.F.R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes. My UAS will not 

operate at an altitude greater than 400 feet AGL unless other altitude limits are 

forthcoming by the FAA. The petitioner will operate the UAS in a manner protecting the 

public and any consenting participants, providing a level of safety at least equivalent to 

or below those in relation to minimum safe altitudes. 14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 

409 (a)(1)&(2); 417(a) 

& (b): Maintenance Inspections. These Regulations only apply to aircraft with an 

airworthiness certificate. They will not, therefore, apply to the petitioner's UAS. However, 

as a. 

safety precaution I inspect my UAS regularly as well as before and after each flight and 

have a 

maintenance program that involves regular software updates and curative measures for 

any 

damaged hardware. Therefore, an equivalent level of safety will be achieved.

In summary, the petitioner seeks an exemption from the following Regulations:
May 20, 2015 Section 333 Exemption Petition - IRISMAGIC

14 C.F.R. 21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. § 

91.7 

(a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.103(b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.105; 14 C.F.R. § 

91.109; 14 

C.F.R. § 91.119; 14 C.F.R. § 91.121; 14 C.F.R. § 91.15l(a); 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.203(a) and 

(b); 

14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a)(l); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a)(1)&(2); 14 

C.F.R. § 

91.409 (a) (2); and, 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.417 (a) & (b) to commercially operate the 

petitioners 

small unmanned vehicle/lightweight unmanned aircraft vehicle for aerial videography/

cinematography/photography, to enhance academic community awareness, produce 

wedding films and videos, sports photography, music and motion picture productions 

and other flight operations. 

Sincerely, 

Russell E. Medley III, PIC, General Manager 

Iris Magic Media LLC / Iris Magic Photo Studios