alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 25 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 25

Congratulating the Government of Peru and the Government of Ecuador for 
signing a peace agreement ending a border dispute which has resulted in 
            several military clashes over the past 50 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 1999

Mr. Gallegly submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the Government of Peru and the Government of Ecuador for 
signing a peace agreement ending a border dispute which has resulted in 
            several military clashes over the past 50 years.

Whereas the Governments of Peru and Ecuador have been engaged in a serious 
        border dispute dating as far back as Spanish colonial times;
Whereas the Rio Protocol signed in 1942 between Peru and Ecuador, and guaranteed 
        by 4 nations including the United States, failed to settle the dispute;
Whereas Peru and Ecuador have gone to war 3 times over the border areas with the 
        most recent clashes taking place in 1995 resulting in dozens of deaths 
        on both sides; and
Whereas the Governments of Peru and Ecuador recently completed long and 
        difficult negotiations and reached a final settlement of the dispute on 
        October 26, 1998: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the Governments of Peru and Ecuador for 
        ending the border dispute between their two countries which has 
        been a source of armed conflict for over 50 years;
            (2) commends the Presidents of both nations for personally 
        becoming involved in the negotiations and for reaching this 
        historic agreement;
            (3) recognizes the commitment of the Presidents of the 
        guarantor nations of Argentina, Brazil, and Chile, along with 
        the United States, in seeking a viable solution to the border 
        dispute;
            (4) urges both the Governments of Peru and Ecuador to honor 
        the border settlement and to cooperate with each other in 
        bringing peace, stability, and economic development to the 
        troubled area; and
            (5) reaffirms the commitment of the United States to 
        support both governments in the implementation of the border 
        agreement.
                                 <all>
```
J~~~ tio srAT

~

s 

~ 'o UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

0 

~~Tqt PROtto\ 

JUL 2 8 20114 

Mr. J.R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

We received your letter dated July 22, 2014, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) 

concurrence on the revised draft memo modifying the certification of the Los Alamos National Laboratory 

(LANL). The purpose of the memo is to suspend the site's certification to characterize waste in the Solids 

(S3000) summary category group and all waste processed at the Waste Characterization, Reduction, and 

Repackaging Facility (WCRRF). Based on our review, we concur with CBFO's revised draft certification 

memo. 

The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of transuranic waste are appropriately included in 

Attachment 4 of the revised draft certification memo. The waste characterization equipment, procedures and 

processes included in the memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the revised draft certification memo for LANL-CCP. 

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343- 

9462. 

Sincerely, 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP 

Site Documents, CBFO 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

RecycledlRecyclable 0 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
From: Janis Hudson To: Wiley, Adina Cc: Mike Wilson Subject: Notice of Amendment Applications Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 5:55:54 PM

You asked that TCEQ provide EPA with data regarding how many permit amendment applications (excluding flexible permit amendment applications) were subject to public notice requirements

.

The table below provides the information that the TCEQ’s Air Permits Division has tracked with regard to the number of non-flexible permit amendment applications received since the commission adopted a rule in 2001 (renumbered in 2010) to develop the criteria for de minimis and insignificant thresholds, and how many of those were subject to notice.

Amendment applications Went to Public Notice

FY02-FY13 5378 2189

*FY is September 1 – August 31.
Document

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
KAMAN CORPORATION EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2019)  


THIS AMENDMENT is made by Kaman Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the purpose of delegating authority for administrative duties under the Kaman Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan.


WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the Corporation originally adopted the Kaman Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan on February 28, 1989, which was amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2019 and most recently amended on November 12, 2018 (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Corporation reserved the right, in Section 14 of the Plan, to amend the Plan; and


NOW THEREFORE, the Corporation hereby amends the Plan, effective as of the date set forth below, in the following particulars:


1.         Section 2.3(k) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“(k)      To delegate to any person or persons the authority to perform for and on behalf of the Committee one or more of the functions of the Committee under the Plan, including the delegation of administrative duties as provided under Section 15.11 of the Plan.”


2.         A new Section 15.11 is added to the Plan as follows: 


“15.11  Delegation of Administrative Authority.  The Committee hereby delegates to the Company’s Chief Human Resources Offer or executive directly responsible for corporate human resources (“CHRO”) all authority necessary or desirable to administer the Plan, including the authority to delegate all or any portion of the delegated authorities under this Section 15.11; provided, however, that only the Committee may change the eligibility requirements to participate in the Plan or the maximum amount that may be contributed to the Plan.  Without limiting the foregoing, the CHRO is hereby directed to (i) administer Purchase Rights under the Plan, (ii) determine whether any Participant has violated any terms and conditions of the Plan so as to warrant cancellation of a Purchase Right, (iii) correct any defect, omission or inconsistency in the Plan in a manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or appropriate consistent with applicable law, (iv) to establish, amend, waive and revoke procedures that it deems necessary for the administration of the Plan, and (v) maintain appropriate records and establish necessary procedures related to the Plan.”


3.         Except as amended herein, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan, as amended, are confirmed and remain unchanged.  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as provided under the terms of the Plan.










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Kaman Corporation has caused this Second Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer this 15th day of November 2021.


															
	ATTEST:		KAMAN CORPORATION
					
					
	By:	/s/ Richard S. Smith, Jr.                   		By:	/s/ James G. Coogan                        
		Richard S. Smith, Jr.			James G. Coogan
		Vice President, Deputy GC and			Senior Vice President and
		Secretary			Chief Financial Officer
### §931d. Art. 131d. Wrongful refusal to testify

Any person subject to this chapter who, in the presence of a court-martial, a board of officers, a military commission, a court of inquiry, a preliminary hearing, or an officer taking a deposition, of or for the United States, wrongfully refuses to qualify as a witness or to answer a question after having been directed to do so by the person presiding shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5447, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2957.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
# National Archives andRecords Administration Officea/the Federal Register
November 18, 2010 FAA 800 Independence Avenue, SW Room 915 J, Regulations Division Washington, DC 20591 ATTN: Nancy Molitor, 

## rAA Liaison Officer forthe Federal Register Dear Ms. Molitor: The material listed in the attachment is approved for incorporation by reference in 14CFR Part 39. This approval is contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by our stafts. The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) iseffective on the effective date oryour final rule. Ifyou wish to enforce some other edition ofthe publication(s) approved, you must: I. Publish notice ofthe change inthe Federal Register, and amend the Code of Federal Regulations; and 2. Ensure that acopy ofthat edition is on file at the Office ofthe Federal Rcgisler; and 3. Notify me in wriling ofthc change. Sincerely,
~A YMONDA. MOSLEY Director ofthe Federal Register FederalRegisterAttomey:~ Attachment



### us mail address: 8601 Adelphi RO;;Jd, College Park, MD 2U74()-(>OO'1 Office location: 800North Capitol Sueci., NW. Suite 700, Washington, DC 20002-4244 Fedeml Register web sitL'S: http:! jwww.archiv('s,gov!fcdcral-rcgiskro/IId http:! jwwW.gpO<1CCCS/;_g(wjn<lmIncorporation hy Reference

IJocket No. FAA-2010-1155: Directorate Idelllifier 2010-NM-238-AD.- Amendment 39-16527: AD 1010-1.J-O!:i

Dassawlt Falcon 50

Printed IIIIMOW Service Bwlletin F50-515 10/12/2010

Pllge / of/
#### § 41.61 Is Diné College eligible to receive other grants?

Yes. Eligibility for grants under this subpart does not bar Diné College from receiving financial assistance under any other Federal program.
### §887a. Art. 87a. Resistance, flight, breach of arrest, and escape

Any person subject to this chapter who—

(1) resists apprehension;

(2) flees from apprehension;

(3) breaks arrest; or

(4) escapes from custody or confinement;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 69, §895; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XI, §1112(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 461; renumbered §887a, Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5401(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2938.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 895 | 50:689. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 95), 64 Stat. 136. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 renumbered section 895 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
June 10, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ADVANCED PERSONAL CARE, LLC, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00251-CV V.

JACQUELYN CHURCHILL, EVERETT CHURCHILL AND JED, INC., 

Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed January 23, 2013 in favor of 

appellees Jacquelyn Churchill, Everett Churchill, and JED, Inc., was heard on the 

transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the 

judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and 

REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court’s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid 

jointly and severally by appellees, Jacquelyn Churchill, Everett Churchill, and 

JED, Inc.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
!"!

#"!$

	



%



	
&
 

	
'

(
!
&	
	

	&




&

%





)



 	
	


	
	




	





	


	

 

 	
	

	


	

		



	

*
		








*

	
		
	







"
)	


	



	


	















	
&

	

	
*	


	
	

	


	








	









	

+&)





'

● *
	
	


	









	

	
	



&	



	



● *
	
	




,	




	
	



	



	&	

● *
	
	




-.	
/..
&



#-.	0/1.
$,	


	

-.%	




	


/..
	


	


	

%







● *
	
	



	
 	
	
	






&2

		


	




			
!

	
	

	


	



 ! "

#	


3
	
	
	





	

	


	






	
!

	


	






4	


		
&	

	

 	


	
	

		



	


%






	




	
		











	




	
	



	


	
	

		







$#	%

*

&
	


	





	

	

%

4	'

● 	


	
	







%


	





	

	


5

● 
&	


5

	


● 










	

	




5

● 
&

5

● &	

%

	

	


5

●&&
	


	

	








&'! 	

!






'&!6



	






	













7&

	


	
&




	
8

	9&

	
!6


	


	








9	

	
	

&



	
%

&:








+
(
	
	&


'

● 

%



)



;

● 




	








;



&

;8	

;

● 8



;+
&


; 	; 	
; 	;

● 8

&;


&

	




&;+
&








;

● +
&


%



;

● ;


;

● 8	

		


	;

● 8

9	





	;

()


	


&
	




&	
%

&

	

 

  






	

2

	
&"!

!"!&
























!








	
<=.




%<%>//%"!%+?@A

#<%>//%->1%B-=/$




!"!

	


%


3%








&


,3

	





	




	







) & ('(5$/75$'( 200,66,21 )7& 25 +( 21680(5

)7&+(/3 ZZZIWFJRY
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 1, 11/2013

Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 9/19/2014

Sample Number: 143221-001 Date Collected: 09/09/2014 08:47 Date Received: 9/9/2014

WWTP Outlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 27.6 ng/L 5 2 JAB 09/16/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 143221-002 Date Collected: 09/09/2014 08:41 Date Received: 9/9/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 26.0 ng/L 5 2 JAB 09/16/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 143221-003 Date Collected: 09/09/2014 08:38 Date Received: 9/9/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 30.1 ng/L 5 2 JAB 09/16/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 143221-004 Date Collected: 09/09/2014 08:49 Date Received: 9/9/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 947 ng/L 20 8 JAB 09/16/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 143221-005 Date Collected: 09/09/2014 08:51 Date Received: 9/9/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 710 ng/L 20 8 JAB 09/16/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 143221-006 Date Collected: 09/09/2014 08:54 Date Received: 9/9/2014

WWTP Inlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 191000 ng/L 10000 4000 JAB 09/16/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Amos Plant, 143221 Page 1 of 2
Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 9/19/2014

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Dave Conover, Senior Chemist

Email dpconover@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4219

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4219

Amos Plant, 143221 Page 2 of 2
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 349

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President

should immediately transmit to Congress the President’s recommendations for emergency response actions, including appropriate offsets, to

provide relief and assistance to the victims of Hurricane Floyd.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 1, 1999

Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. JONES of North Carolina,

Mr. COBLE, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. HAYES, Mr.

ETHERIDGE, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. BURR of North Carolina, and Mr. PRICE of North Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the President should immediately transmit to Congress

the President’s recommendations for emergency response

actions, including appropriate offsets, to provide relief

and assistance to the victims of Hurricane Floyd.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

3 The House of Representatives finds the following:
2

•HRES 349 IH

1 (1) Hurricane Floyd made landfall on the coast

2 of North Carolina on September 15, 1999, as a cat3 egory two hurricane.

4 (2) In the State of North Carolina alone, the

5 hurricane caused the deaths of at least 50 individ6 uals, damage to more than 40,000 homes, and bil7 lions of dollars in infrastructure damage and agri8 cultural losses.

9 (3) Citizens of the States of Florida, Georgia,

10 South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland,

11 Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York,

12 and Connecticut have registered for Federal disaster

13 relief aid as a result of Hurricane Floyd.

14 (4) More than 6 weeks after this disaster, the

15 citizens of these States continue to await critical as16 sistance from the Federal government to rebuild

17 their homes, businesses, and lives.

18 SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

19 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that

20 the President should immediately transmit to Congress

21 the President’s recommendations for emergency response

22 actions, including appropriate offsets, to provide relief and

23 assistance to the victims of Hurricane Floyd.

Æ
#### § 286.3 Eligible applicants.

Applications for grants may be accepted only from individual Indians, Indian tribes, Indian partnerships, corporations or cooperative associations authorized to do business under State, Federal, or Tribal law. These applicants must have a form of organization acceptable to the Assistant Secretary and unable to meet their total financing needs from their own resources and by loans from other sources such as banks, Farmers Home Administration, Small Business Administration, Production Credit Associations, and Federal Land Banks. Associations, corporations or partnerships shall be at least fifty-one percent owned by eligible Indians or an eligible Indian tribe. This Indian ownership must actively participate in the management and operation of the economic enterprise by representation on the board of directors of a corporation or cooperative association proportionate to the Indian ownership which will enable the Indian owner(s) to control management decisions. The legal organization documents will provide for the number of Indians which are to be on the board of directors, how they along with other directors will be elected or appointed and qualifications required as a condition for becoming a member of the board of directors. The legal organization documents shall provide safeguards which will prevent Indian ownership and control from decreasing below fifty-one percent. Evidence of Indian ownership in a cooperative association or corporation will be evidenced by stock ownership, if stock is or has been issued, or by other evidence satisfactory to the Assistant Secretary. Partnerships will be evidenced by written partnership agreements which show the percentage of Indian ownership, role and authority in making management decisions in controlling the operation of the economic enterprise.
H. Res. 312

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 30, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2910) to amend title 49, United States Code,

to authorize appropriations for the National Transportation

Safety Board for fiscal years 2000, 2001, and 2002, and for

other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now

printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in the
2

•HRES 312 EH

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each section of that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of

the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of

the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for the purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 312 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.