alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 16, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, February 16, 2011, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Jenkins. For more information, please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: January 5, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director,Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-406 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 166.818 How are the proceeds from trespass distributed? Unless otherwise provided by tribal law: ( a ) We will treat any amounts recovered under § 166.812 of this subpart as proceeds from the sale of agricultural property from the Indian agricultural land upon which the trespass occurred.
( b ) Proceeds recovered under § 166.812 of this subpart may be distributed to: ( 1 ) Repair damages of the Indian agricultural land and property;
( 2 ) Reimburse the affected parties, including the permittee for loss due to the trespass, as negotiated and provided in the permit; and
( 3 ) Reimburse for costs associated with the enforcement of this subpart.
( c ) If any money is left over after the distribution of the proceeds described in paragraph (b) of this section, we will return it to the trespasser or, where we cannot identify the owner of the impounded property within 180 days, we will deposit the net proceeds of the sale into the accounts of the landowners where the trespass occurred.
University of Kentucky
    UK Libraries
    Special Collections Research Center
Menu
    About
                    About ExploreUK
            How to
                    Activate your Researcher AccountRequest MaterialsVisit SCRCFind Copyright and Use Information
            Contact Us
            Researcher Account LoginSearch Home |
    Back to Search Results

Download
    JPEGof this page
    PDFof entire itemEmployment and Income from Gold Placering by Hand Methods, 1935-37 by Robinson Newcomb, Charles White Merrill, and R. L. Kiessling
Date
1940Creator
Newcomb, Robinson, 1901-.Language
EnglishCollection
Maryland Works Progress Administration PublicationsDescription
Other contributors: Merrill, Charles White; Kiessling, R. L.; National Research Project on Reemployment Opportunities and Recent Changes in Industrial Techniques (U.S.); United States. Bureau of Mines. xiv, 142 p. ill., 1 map ; 26 cm. Mineral technology and output per man studies ; report no. E-14. UK holds archival copy for ASERL Collaborative Federal Depository Program libraries. Call number FW 4.7:E-14.

You may come across language in UK Libraries Special Collections Research Center collections and online resources that you find harmful or offensive. SCRC collects materials from different cultures and time periods to preserve and make available the historical record. These materials document the time period when they were created and the view of their creator. As a result, some may demonstrate racist and offensive views that do not reflect the values of UK Libraries.

If you find description with problematic language that you think SCRC should review, please contact us at SCRC@uky.edu.

Item Details
Text

Rights
This digital resource may be freely searched and displayed in accordance with U. S. copyright laws.Publisher
Philadelphia, Pa. : Work Projects Administration, National Research Project in cooperation with Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of MinesFormat
booksPermalink
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/catalog/xt7prr1pj83dXML Metadata
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7prr1pj83d/data/mets.xml

The text may or may not be an accurate representation of the original.
### [§2196. Renumbered §4843]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2196, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title II, §247(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1523; amended Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §701(i)(2), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 116, defined "defense laboratory", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–190, §825(a)(1). See section 2199 of this title.
#### § 166.3 May decisions under this part be appealed?

Yes. Except where otherwise provided in this part, appeals from decisions by the BIA under this part may be taken pursuant to 25 CFR part 2.
# C_2006246EN.01002702.xml

| 13.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/27

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4322 — Morgan Stanley/IHG/Portfolio Hotels)

(2006/C 246/22)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4322. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4322. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
**Exhibit 34.1**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

SLM Corporation: 

We have examinedmanagement’s assessment, included in the accompanying Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria, dated March 29, 2013, that Sallie Mae, Inc. (the “Company”), a direct wholly owned subsidiary of SLM Corporation, complied withthe servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (Regulation AB) for the SLM Regulation AB Student Loan Platform (the Platform), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, excluding(1) criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi), 1122 (d)(3)(iii), 1122 (d)(4)(x), 1122 (d)(4)(xi), 1122 (d)(4)(xii) and 1122 (d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed byit with respect to the Platform and (2) criteria 1122 (d)(2)(ii) which the Company has determined is applicable to the Platform but is excluded from the scope of management’s assertion as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012. Appendix Bto Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities thatcomprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia,Pennsylvania 

March 29, 2013
### §9343. Highest grade held satisfactorily: Reserve enlisted members reduced in grade not as a result of the member's misconduct

(a) A Reserve enlisted member of the Air Force described in subsection (b) who is retired under section 9314 of this title shall be retired in the highest enlisted grade in which the member served on active duty satisfactorily (or, in the case of a member of the National Guard, in which the member served on full-time National Guard duty satisfactorily), as determined by the Secretary of the Air Force.

(b) This section applies to a Reserve enlisted member who—

(1) at the time of retirement is serving on active duty (or, in the case of a member of the National Guard, on full-time National Guard duty) in a grade lower than the highest enlisted grade held by the member while on active duty (or full-time National Guard duty); and

(2) was previously administratively reduced in grade not as a result of the member's own misconduct, as determined by the Secretary of the Air Force.

(c) This section applies with respect to Reserve enlisted members who are retired under section 9314 of this title after September 30, 1996.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title V, §532(c)(1), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2519, §8963; renumbered §9343 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§806(b)(14), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, 1840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9343 was renumbered section 9443 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §806(b)(14), renumbered section 8963 of this title as this section.

Subsecs. (a), (c). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 9314" for "section 8914".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 428

Condemning the discriminatory practices prevalent at Bob Jones University.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 29, 2000

Mr. CROWLEY (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. KENNEDY of

Rhode Island, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. WYNN,

Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr.

WEINER, Mr. ROEMER, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. LAMPSON,

Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. ROMEROBARCELO ́

, Mr. DINGELL, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. MEEHAN,

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. FORBES, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr.

CAPUANO, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. ROTHMAN, Ms. BERKLEY, Ms. DELAURO,

Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. VELA ́

ZQUEZ, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. BALDACCI,

Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico,

Mr. NADLER, Mr. LARSON, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. RANGEL, and

Mr. HOLT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Condemning the discriminatory practices prevalent at Bob

Jones University.

Whereas the House of Representatives strongly rejects the

practices of racism, segregation, and intolerance based on

religious beliefs;

Whereas the administration of Bob Jones University enforces

a segregationist policy by prohibiting interracial couples

on the Bob Jones University campus;
2

•HRES 428 IH

Whereas officials of Bob Jones University routinely disparage

those of other religious faiths with intolerant and derogatory remarks;

Whereas officials of Bob Jones University have likened the

Pope of the Roman Catholic Church to a ‘‘possessed

demon’’, and branded Catholicism as a ‘‘satanic system

and religion of the anti-Christ’’;

Whereas the website of Bob Jones University greets visitors

with the University’s belief that Catholicism and Mormonism are ‘‘cults’’; and

Whereas senior officials of Bob Jones University have made

openly racist remarks on many occasions regarding African Americans and Asian Americans: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) condemns practices, such as those prevalent

3 at Bob Jones University, that seek to discriminate

4 against and divide Americans on the basis of race,

5 ethnicity, and religion; and

6 (2) strongly denounces individuals who seek to

7 subvert the American ideals of inclusion, equality,

8 and social justice.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 561 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 27, 2000.
Whereas neighborhood crime is of continuing concern to the American people;
Whereas the fight against neighborhood crime requires people to work together in 
        cooperation with law enforcement officials;
Whereas neighborhood crime watch organizations are effective at promoting 
        awareness about, and the participation of volunteers in, crime 
        prevention activities at the local level;
Whereas neighborhood crime watch groups can contribute to the Nation's war on 
        drugs by helping to prevent their communities from becoming markets for 
        drug dealers;
Whereas crime and violence in schools is of continuing concern to the American 
        people due to the recent high-profile incidents that have resulted in 
        fatalities at several schools across the United States;
Whereas community-based programs involving law enforcement, school 
        administrators, teachers, parents, and local communities work 
        effectively to reduce school violence and crime;
Whereas citizens across America will soon take part in a ``National Night Out'', 
        a unique crime prevention event which will demonstrate the importance 
        and effectiveness of community participation in crime prevention efforts 
        by having people spend the period from 7 to 10 o'clock P.M. on August 1, 
        2000, with their neighbors in front of their homes with their lights on; 
        and
Whereas schools that turn their lights on from 7 to 10 o'clock P.M. on August 1, 
        2000, would send a positive message to the participants of ``National 
        Night Out'' and would show their commitment to reduce crime and violence 
        in schools: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
President should focus appropriate attention on the issue of neighborhood crime 
prevention, community policing, and reduction of school crime by delivering 
speeches, convening meetings, and directing his Administration to make reducing 
crime an important priority.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 39.804 How is the SUIV calculated? The SUIV is calculated by the following 5-step process: ( a ) *Step 1.* Use the adjusted national average current expenditures (ANACE) of public and private schools determined by data from the U.S. Department of Education-National Center of Education Statistics (NCES) for the last school year for which data is available.
( b ) *Step 2.* Subtract the average specific Federal share per student (title I part A and IDEA part B) of the total revenue for Bureau-funded elementary and secondary schools for the last school year for which data is available as reported by NCES (15%).
( c ) *Step 3.* Subtract the administrative cost grant/agency area technical services revenue per student as a percentage of the total revenue (current expenditures) of Bureau-funded schools from the last year data is available.
( d ) *Step 4.* Subtract the day transportation revenue per student as a percentage of the total revenue (current revenue) Bureau-funded schools for the last school year for which data is available.
( e ) *Step 5.* Add Johnson O'Malley funding. (See the table, in § 39.805)
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Cencosud S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 of the Company (the Form 20-F) fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Jaime Soler       
|Name:                  |  | Jaime Soler            
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                  |  | April 30, 2015         
|                      
|/s/ Juan Manuel Parada
|Name:                  |  | Juan Manuel Parada     
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                  |  | April 30, 2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLES956000-L14200000-BJ0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plat of survey; Minnesota.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States office in Springfield, Virginia.

# DATES:

BLM will file the plat of survey on April 22, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management-Eastern States, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The lands surveyed are:

## Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota

T. 145 N. R. 40 W.

The plat of survey represents the corrective dependent resurvey of a portion of the East and west boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, a portion of sections subdivisions, and the subdivision of sections 31, 34 and 34, Township 145 North, Range 40 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota, and was accepted February 3, 2011.

We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information.

If BLM receives a protest against the survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest.

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals.

Dated: February 16, 2011.

Dominica Van Koten,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

[FR Doc. 2011-4045 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P