# EMISSIONS TEST REPORT

BIG BEND STATION FACILITY ID NUMBER: 0570039 EMISSION UNIT ID NO: -001 BOILER NO. 1

PARTICULATE MATTER, SULFUR DIOXIDE, AND, VISIBLE EMISSIONS EVALUATION
May 17, 2007

Prepared For: Tampa Electric Company

Big Bend Power Station P.O. Box 111 Tampa, Florida 33601-0111

Prepared By: Tampa Electric Company Environmental, Health & Safety Environmental Services Air Services Group

Environmental Services Air Services Group 5010 Causeway Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33619- 6130

## REPORT CERTIFICATION
The sampling and subseque nt data entry/reduction detailed in this report was conducted at my direction, and I here by certify that this test report is authentic and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Signature:__________________________ Jorge A. Varino Environmental Technician Test Team Lead Air Services Group Environmental Health & Safety Tampa Electric Company

I have reviewed the test performa nce, associated quality assurance activities, the resultant calculations, and the contents of this report, and certify that all project quality obj ectives have been met. Th is report is approved for submittal.

Signature:__________________________ Raymond A. McDarby, Jr. Senior Environmental Technician Quality Assurance/Quality Control Specialist Air Services Group Environmental Health & Safety Tampa Electric Company

I have reviewed the testing details and results submitted in this report, and hereby certify that this test report is authenti c and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Signature:__________________________ David A. Smith Coordinator – Air Services Group

Environmental Health & Safety Tampa Electric Company

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE NO. 1.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 1 2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION/TEST PROCEDURES 3 3.0 TEST RESULTS SOOT BLOWING PARTICULATE TEST SUMMARY 6 NON SOOT BLOWING PARTICULATE TEST SUMMARY 7 SULFUR DIOXIDE INFORMATION SUMMARY 8 OPACITY DATA SUMMARY 9 HEAT INPUT CALCULATIONS 11 4.0 FIGURES FIGURE 1 SAMPLING LOCATION DIAGRAM 13 APPENDICES
A. PARTICULATE MATTER CALCULATIONS
B. PARTICULATE MATTER LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA C. BOILER/PRECIPITATOR OPERATIONAL DATA
D. PLANT CEMS DAHS PRINTOUTS
E. FUEL ANALYSIS
F. FIELD DATA SHEETS G. SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS
H. CHAIN OF CUSTODY
I. TEST PARTICIPANTS

## 1.0 INTRODUCTION
On May 17, 2007, Tampa Electric Com pany’s Environmental Services, Air Services Group, performed source emission tests at the Big B end Station, Boiler No. 1, emissions unit I.D.# 0570039-001. Testing was conducted according to procedures stipulated by t he Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for fossil fuel steam generators, and requirements in Title V Permit # 0570039-021-AV.

1

## 2.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The particulate matter emission rate under soot blowing conditions was derived by performing three United States En vironmental Protec tion Agency (USEPA) Reference Method 5-B test runs. The av erage of the three test runs was 0.02 lb/mmBtu. The FDEP permitted emission ra te under soot blowing conditions is 0.03 lb/mmBtu.

The particulate matter emission rate under non-soot blowing conditions was derived by performing three USEPA Refe rence Method 5-B test runs. The average of the three test runs wa s 0.01 lb/mmBtu. The FDEP permitted emission rate under non-soot blowi ng conditions is 0.03 lb/mmBtu.

The Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 

### ) emission rate was determined using data provided by the Continuous Emissions Monitoring Syst em’s (CEMS), Data Acquisition and Handing System (DAHS). The average emission rate for the test period was determined to be 0.2 lb/mmBtu, and 693 lb s/hr. The FDEP a llowable emission rate is 6.5 lbs/mmBtu based on a two hour average, and 3310 lbs/hr based on scenario 3 as listed in condition A.9 of the permit.

Visible emissions were evaluated using a United Sciences, Incorporated, Model 500C transmissometer (S/N 5001688), duri ng both soot blowing and non-soot blowing testing. The 1-hour average opac ity under soot blowing conditions was 8.4%. The 1-hour average opacity under non- soot blowing conditions was 9.4%. The FDEP allowable emission rate is 20 percent opacity.

During the test performed on May 17, 2 007, Boiler No. 1 wa s operated at an average heat input rate of 3908 mmBtu/hr and an average load of 384 megawatts. The average quantity of fuel burned was 164.4 tons per hour.

2

## 3.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION/TEST PROCEDURES

Big Bend Station is located on Big Bend Road, Ruskin, Florida at UTM coordinates East 361.9 North 3075.0. The Boiler No. 1 particulate matter sampling location consists of a shared circ ular stack 29.83 feet in diameter with four sample ports located 90 degrees apart on the stack circumference. These ports are located downstr eam of the electrostatic precipitator and the FGD scrubber. The sampling ports were determined to be 8.77 diameters downstream of the transition ductwork and 2.43 diameters upstream of the stack exit. Using these criteria, a total of 12 sampling points were chosen for particulate sampling as stipulated in t he USEPA Method 1 test procedure. During this test, Boiler No. 2 was not operating, and was isolated from the FGD module. A diagram of the stack sampling location is included in Figure 1 along with other pertinent information on the test site.

Boiler No. 1 is serviced by an electrostati c precipitator for the control of flyash emissions, and a flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system for control of sulfur dioxide emissions.

During the test the boiler wa s fired with a solid fuel matrix comprised of 83.8% coal, 11.6% petroleum coke, and 4.6% residual.

Particulate sampling was perform ed according to USEPA Method 5B "Determination of Nonsulfuric Acid Part iculate Matter from Stationary Sources"

Diluent gas sampling and analysis was performed according to USEPA Method 3 "Gas Analysis for Determination of Emissi on Rate Correction Factor, or Excess Air”. Gas analysis was performed on-site using an Orsat analyzer.

Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 

### ) and Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 

### ) data were provided by the Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) , Data Acquisition and

3

### Handling System (DAHS). Averages were derived from the time frame of 7:30 through 18:18 on May 17, 2007. This data is included as Appendix B of this report.

Visible emissions were a ssessed using the installed Continuous Opacity Monitor (COM), and the CEMS DAHS.

4

## 4.0 TABULATED RESULTS

5

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

Customer: T ampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 T est Date: May 17, 2007 Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing

Run 1s Run 2s Run 3s T est Average

V m(std) 

### , scf 35.6735 36.4329 35.9816 36.02932

B ws 

### , ratio 0.1323 0.1324 0.1311 0.13193

M

d 

### , lb/lb - mole 30.32 30.32 30.32 30.320

M

s 

### , lb/lb - mole 28.69 28.69 28.71 28.695

Q s 

### , acf/min 857805.37 870375.05 868800.88 865660.43

Q s(std) 

### , dscf/min 658591.55 668627.24 668321.2 665180

I, % 100.5 101.1 99.9 100.50

C, lbs/dscf 1.319E-06 1.371E-06 1.768E-06 1.486E-06

E M 

### , lbs/hr 52.1368 54.9837 70.8804 59.33362

E R 

### , lbs/MMBtu 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02



### 6

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

Customer: T ampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 T est Date: May 17, 2007 Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 T est Average

V m(std) 

### , scf 36.1323 35.1614 34.9625 35.41875

B ws 

### , ratio 0.1365 0.1357 0.1344 0.13551

M

d 

### , lb/lb - mole 30.32 30.32 30.32 30.320

M

s 

### , lb/lb - mole 28.64 28.65 28.66 28.650

Q s 

### , acf/min 867247.79 845469.82 843769.46 852162.35

Q s(std) 

### , dscf/min 662826.53 648897.43 647316.5 653013.49

I, % 101.1 100.5 100.2 100.60

C, lbs/dscf 1.04E-06 9.906E-07 1.248E-06 1.093E-06

E M 

### , lbs/hr 41.3717 38.5694 48.4903 42.81045

E R 

### , lbs/MMBtu 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01



### 7

## BIG BEND STATION SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA FROM CEMs

T est Period Information Start Time 7:30:00 Eastern Standard Time (EST) Stop Time 18:18:00 Eastern Standard Time (EST) T otal Time 10:48:00 Correspondin g to the time frame for the PM test.

Sulfur Dioxide Data: RM - 19 SO 2 

### CO 2 

### SO 2 

### SO 2 

### ppmvw %, wet lb/mmBtu lbs/hr 64.266972 10.85505 0.2 693

Calculation Details SO 2 

### , lb/mmBtu = SO 2 

### , ppmvw x C f 

### x F c 

### x (100 / CO2 %, wet)
where: C f



### = 1.6635E-07 (lb/scf)/ppm SO 2 

### F c



### = 1800 scf/mmBtu SO 2 

### , lbs/hr = SO 2 

### , lb/mmBtu x Heat Input, mmBtu/hr where: Heat Input = 3908 mmBtu/hr, from Heat Input Calculation 

### Unit #1 WET-BOTTOM UTILITY BOILER May 17, 2007

CEM DATA



### 8

## BIG BEND STATION VISIBLE EMISSIONS DATA FROM OPACITY MONITO R

Date Time OPACITY1 05/17/2007 14:06 9.6 05/17/2007 14:12 9.5 05/17/2007 14:18 9.2 05/17/2007 14:24 9.3 05/17/2007 14:30 9.6 05/17/2007 14:36 9.4 05/17/2007 14:42 9.6 05/17/2007 14:48 9.4 05/17/2007 14:54 9.1 05/17/2007 15:00 9.4 05/17/2007 15:06 9.5

T est Avera g e: 9.42 Maximum Six Minute Avera g e: 9.6

Date Time OPACITY1 

### 05/17/2007 7:30 7.5 05/17/2007 7:36 6.9 05/17/2007 7:42 7.8 05/17/2007 7:48 7.6 05/17/2007 7:54 8 05/17/2007 8:00 8.2 05/17/2007 8:06 8.1 05/17/2007 8:12 8.4 05/17/2007 8:18 8.2 05/17/2007 8:24 7.3 05/17/2007 8:30 7.5

T est Avera g e: 7.77 Maximum Six Minute Avera g e: 8.4 Unit #1 WET BOTTOM UTILITY BOILE R NON-SOOTBLOWING CONDITIONS

SOOTBLOWING CONDITIONS

9

# Page Intentionally Blank

10

## BIG BEND GENERATING STATION HEAT INPUT CALCULATIONS

Gross Heat Rate, Previous Month (April): 10167 KMBtu/MWh 1.0167E+07 MMBtu/MWh

Me g aWatt Hour Inte g rator Information Initial Inte g rator Readin g : 978521 MWh

Final Inte g rator Readin g : 982680 MWh T otal: 4159 MWh

T est Time Information T estin g Start Time: 7:32

T estin g End Time: 18:21

T otal Test Time: 10.82 hours
Calculated Heat Input Avera g e Unit Load, MW = MWh / hours: 384.4 MW Heat Input, MMBtu/h = MMBtu/MWh x MW: 3908.2 mmBtu/hr
Fuel Consumption Calculation

Laboratory Sample ID: AA87628 Btu as received: 11885 Btu/lb T ons of Fuel Consumed, Tons/hr = (mmBtu/h / Btu/lb) x 500: 164.4 T ons/hour Unit #1
May 17, 2007 WET-BOTTOM UTILTIY BOILE R



### 11

## 5.0 FIGURES

12FIGURE 1 EXHAUST STACK 426.5 ’ EL. BIG BEND GENERATING STATION

BOILERS 1 and 2 PARTICULATE TRAVERSE POINTS

OUTLET 

# N

PORT LOCATION PLAN

REVISED 1-18-00 COMMON STACK1 - WET TEST LOCATION

STACK DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM DISTURBANCE = 8.77

STACK DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM DISTURBANCE = 2.43

STACK DIAMETER = 29.8333 FT. ID. STACK AREA = 699.0246 SQ. FT.

PORT LENGTH’S = 62 IN. TRAVERSE POINT

1

2

3 % OF STACK DIAMETER IN. FROM STACK WALL

4.4%

14.6%

29.6% 15.75 IN.

52.26 IN.

105.96 IN. 499 ’ EL.

165 ’ EL. 261.5 ’

FGD

PRESSURIZED ANNULUS 72.5 ’



### A

B C D

9 ’ EL.



### 13

## APPENDIX A

PARTICULATE MATTER CALCULATIONS

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing Run Number: 1s Date: 05/17/07
Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n 

### : 0.273 inches Barometric Pressure, P b 

### : 29.60 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n 

### : 0.000406 ft 2 

### Stack Pressure, P s 

### : 29.58 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.250 "H 2 

### O Effective Stack Area, A s 

### : 452.389 ft 2 

### Sample Volume, V m 

### : 37.843 ft 3 

### Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless 

### Average Meter Temp., T m 

### : 84.2 o 

### F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 

### Average Stack Temp., T s 

### : 129.9 o 

### F 6.0 % O 2 

### Average √ Δ p: 0.528 "H 2 

### O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V lc 

### : 115.6 ml 81.0 % N 2 

### Meter Box Y: 0.979 dimensionless 

### F-factor, F d 

### , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) 

### = 4.707E-02 x V lc 

### 5.441 scf V m ( std ) 

### = 17.647 x V m 

### x Y x (P b 

### + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m 

### +460) 35.673 dscf B w s 

### = V w ( std ) 

### / (V m ( std ) 

### + V w ( std ) 

### ) 0.132 % FDA = 1.0 - B w s 

### 0.868 % M d 

### = (0.44 x %CO 2 

### ) + (0.32 x %O 2 

### ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 

### + % CO)) 30.32 lb./lb. mole M s 

### = (M d 

### x FDA) + (18.0 x B w s 

### ) 28.69 lb./lb. mole

v s 

### = 85.49 x C p 

### x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s 

### + 460) / (M s 

### x P s 

### )) 31.60 ft/second Q s 

### = v s 

### x A s 

### x 60 857805.4 acf/minute Q s ( std ) 

### = Q s 

### x FDA x (528 / (T s 

### + 460)) x (P s 

### / 29.92)) 658591.6 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 

### 100.5 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.021350 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:
c s 

### = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 

### 0.009 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s 

### x 17.647 x P s 

### x (FDA / (T s 

### + 460) 0.007 grains/acf C = c s 

### / 7000 1.319E-06 lbs/dscf E M 

### = C x Q s(std) 

### x 60 52.1 lbs/hr E R 

### = C x F d 

### x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 

### ) 0.018 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing Run Number: 2s Date: 05/17/07
Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n 

### : 0.273 inches Barometric Pressure, P b 

### : 29.60 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n 

### : 0.000406 ft 2 

### Stack Pressure, P s 

### : 29.58 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.288 "H 2 

### O Effective Stack Area, A s 

### : 452.389 ft 2 

### Sample Volume, V m 

### : 38.645 ft 3 

### Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless 

### Average Meter Temp., T m 

### : 84.2 o 

### F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 

### Average Stack Temp., T s 

### : 129.6 o 

### F 6.0 % O 2 

### Average √ Δ p: 0.536 "H 2 

### O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V lc 

### : 118.1 ml 81.0 % N 2 

### Meter Box Y: 0.979 dimensionless 

### F-factor, F d 

### , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) 

### = 4.707E-02 x V lc 

### 5.559 scf V m ( std ) 

### = 17.647 x V m 

### x Y x (P b 

### + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m 

### +460) 36.433 dscf B w s 

### = V w ( std ) 

### / (V m ( std ) 

### + V w ( std ) 

### ) 0.132 % FDA = 1.0 - B w s 

### 0.868 % M d 

### = (0.44 x %CO 2 

### ) + (0.32 x %O 2 

### ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 

### + % CO)) 30.32 lb./lb. mole M s 

### = (M d 

### x FDA) + (18.0 x B w s 

### ) 28.69 lb./lb. mole

v s 

### = 85.49 x C p 

### x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s 

### + 460) / (M s 

### x P s 

### )) 32.07 ft/second Q s 

### = v s 

### x A s 

### x 60 870375.0 acf/minute Q s ( std ) 

### = Q s 

### x FDA x (528 / (T s 

### + 460)) x (P s 

### / 29.92)) 668627.2 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 

### 101.1 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.022650 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:
c s 

### = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 

### 0.010 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s 

### x 17.647 x P s 

### x (FDA / (T s 

### + 460) 0.007 grains/acf C = c s 

### / 7000 1.371E-06 lbs/dscf E M 

### = C x Q s(std) 

### x 60 55.0 lbs/hr E R 

### = C x F d 

### x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 

### ) 0.019 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing Run Number: 3s Date: 05/17/07
Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.273 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.60 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000406 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.58 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.287 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 38.267 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 85.3 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 129.7 o F 6.0 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.535 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V l c : 115.3 ml 81.0 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.979 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V l c 5.427 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 35.982 dscf B ws = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.131 % FDA = 1.0 - B ws 0.869 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.32 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B ws ) 28.71 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 32.01 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 868800.9 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 668321.2 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 99.9 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.028850 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:
c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.012 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.010 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 1.768E-06 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 70.9 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.024 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing Run Number: 1 Date: 05/17/07
Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.273 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.60 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000406 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.58 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.285 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 38.573 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 87.7 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 129.8 o F 6.0 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.533 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V l c : 121.3 ml 81.0 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.979 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V l c 5.710 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 36.132 dscf B ws = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.136 % FDA = 1.0 - B ws 0.864 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.32 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B ws ) 28.64 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 31.95 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 867247.8 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 662826.5 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 101.1 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.017050 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:
c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.007 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.006 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 1.040E-06 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 41.4 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.014 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing Run Number: 2 Date: 05/17/07
Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.273 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.60 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000406 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.58 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.232 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 37.667 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 89.5 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 127.9 o F 6.0 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.521 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V l c : 117.3 ml 81.0 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.979 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V l c 5.521 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 35.161 dscf B ws = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.136 % FDA = 1.0 - B ws 0.864 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.32 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B ws ) 28.65 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 31.15 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 845469.8 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 648897.4 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 100.5 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.015800 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:
c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.007 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.005 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 9.906E-07 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 38.6 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.014 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing Run Number: 3 Date: 05/17/07
Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.273 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.60 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000406 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.58 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.215 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 37.234 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 86.3 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 129.1 o F 6.0 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.519 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V l c : 115.3 ml 81.0 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.979 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V l c 5.427 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 34.963 dscf B ws = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.134 % FDA = 1.0 - B ws 0.866 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.32 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B ws ) 28.66 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 31.09 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 843769.5 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 647316.5 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 100.2 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.019800 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:
c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.0087 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.0067 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 1.248E-06 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 48.5 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.017 lbs/MMBtu

## APPENDIX B

PARTICULATE MATTER LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATACustomerAIR SERVICESPlantBIG BENDUnit#1Method5-BStack Test Completion Date05/17/2007AnalystSSSample NumberACETONE BEAKER1st weighingDate05/25/2007Time13:15% RH46.0%2nd weighingDate05/29/2007Time10:05% RH45.0%3rd weighingDateTime% RH4th weighingDateTime% RH***Blank***Run 1Run 2Run 3Run 1SRun 2SRun 3SAcetone Container IDAIR 77AIR AGAIR 12AIR 31AIR 22AIR 16AIR 28Acetone Rinse Vol.(Va), mls200.00002002002002002002001st Gross Wt., grams109.2203106.9288109.0196107.807397.3450105.1971108.70702nd Gross Wt., grams109.2205106.9292109.0197107.807497.3453105.1975108.70733rd Gross Wt., grams4th Gross Wt., gramsAvg. Gross Wt., grams109.22040106.92900109.01965107.8073597.34515105.19730108.70715Tare Wt., grams109.21940106.92525109.01730107.8028597.33995105.18965108.69240Acetone Blank Wt.,mg1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Acetone Particulate Wt.,mg2.751.353.504.206.6513.75Acetone Residue, mg/g0.0063Acetone Blank CriteriaOK to subtract acetone blankFILTER1st weighingDate05/23/2007Time10:25% RH45.5%Date05/25/2007Time13:05% RH46.0%3rd weighingDateTime% RH4th weighingDateTime% RHFilter/Thimble ID2030622030532030512030572030592030602030611st Gross Wt., grams0.25290.26610.26530.26710.26930.26850.26502nd Gross Wt., grams0.25300.26620.26500.26700.26930.26830.26533rd Gross Wt., grams4th Gross Wt., gramsAvg. Gross Wt., grams0.252950.266150.265150.267050.269300.268400.26515Tare Wt., grams0.252800.251850.250700.250750.252150.252400.25005Filter Particulate Wt.,mg14.3014.4516.3017.1516.0015.10Difference, milligrams0.15Total Sample Particulate Wt.,mg17.0515.8019.8021.3522.6528.85Start Here

## APPENDIX C

BOILER/PRECIPITATOR OPERATIONAL DATA

## APPENDIX D

PLANT CEMS DAHS PRINTOUTS

### Corrected CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

05/17/2007 7:30 76.6 11.2 05/17/2007 7:36 70.4 11.3 05/17/2007 7:42 72.5 11.4 05/17/2007 7:48 73.1 11.3 05/17/2007 7:54 67.7 11.2 05/17/2007 8:00 69.1 11.1 05/17/2007 8:06 71.4 11.1 05/17/2007 8:12 65.6 11.1 05/17/2007 8:18 68 11.1 05/17/2007 8:24 71.1 11.2 05/17/2007 8:30 66.3 11.3 05/17/2007 8:36 67.5 11.2 05/17/2007 8:42 71.2 11.2 05/17/2007 8:48 65.6 11.2 05/17/2007 8:54 67.5 11.1 05/17/2007 9:00 69.3 11.1 05/17/2007 9:06 65 11.1 05/17/2007 9:12 66.5 11 05/17/2007 9:18 70.5 11 05/17/2007 9:24 65.2 11.1 05/17/2007 9:30 65.7 11.1 05/17/2007 9:36 69.2 11.2 05/17/2007 9:42 65.5 11.1 05/17/2007 9:48 68.4 11.1 05/17/2007 9:54 67.7 11.1 05/17/2007 10:00 65.3 11.1 05/17/2007 10:06 69.2 11 05/17/2007 10:12 66.6 11.1 05/17/2007 10:18 64.6 11 05/17/2007 10:24 68.5 10.9 05/17/2007 10:30 65.1 10.9 05/17/2007 10:36 64.5 10.9 05/17/2007 10:42 67.8 10.8 05/17/2007 10:48 64.3 10.9 05/17/2007 10:54 64.7 10.8 05/17/2007 11:00 67.6 10.9 05/17/2007 11:06 62.1 10.9 05/17/2007 11:12 65 10.8 05/17/2007 11:18 66.5 10.9 05/17/2007 11:24 61.9 10.8

Page 1 of 3

### Corrected CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 05/17/2007 11:30 64.9 10.8 05/17/2007 11:36 62.7 10.8 05/17/2007 11:42 61.6 10.7 05/17/2007 11:48 64.7 10.7 05/17/2007 11:54 60.2 10.6 05/17/2007 12:00 61.4 10.6 05/17/2007 12:06 64.1 10.7 05/17/2007 12:12 59.9 10.8 05/17/2007 12:18 62 10.7 05/17/2007 12:24 62.7 10.8 05/17/2007 12:30 61.1 10.7 05/17/2007 12:36 64.2 10.7 05/17/2007 12:42 62.5 10.7 05/17/2007 12:48 63 10.7 05/17/2007 12:54 64.5 10.7 05/17/2007 13:00 60.3 10.6 05/17/2007 13:06 64.4 10.7 05/17/2007 13:12 62.7 10.7 05/17/2007 13:18 61.8 10.7 05/17/2007 13:24 65.3 10.6 05/17/2007 13:30 61.9 10.7 05/17/2007 13:36 61.9 10.7 05/17/2007 13:42 66 10.7 05/17/2007 13:48 61.8 10.7 05/17/2007 13:54 62.7 10.7 05/17/2007 14:00 65.3 10.6 05/17/2007 14:06 60.4 10.6 05/17/2007 14:12 63 10.7 05/17/2007 14:18 63.6 10.9 05/17/2007 14:24 62.2 10.9 05/17/2007 14:30 65 10.9 05/17/2007 14:36 61.2 10.8 05/17/2007 14:42 62 10.8 05/17/2007 14:48 63.3 10.8 05/17/2007 14:54 60.1 10.8 05/17/2007 15:00 64 10.8 05/17/2007 15:06 62.1 10.9 05/17/2007 15:12 61.1 10.8 05/17/2007 15:18 63.3 10.8 05/17/2007 15:24 33.7 5.1

Page 2 of 3

### Corrected CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 05/17/2007 15:30 61.4 10.6 05/17/2007 15:36 64.3 10.8 05/17/2007 15:42 60.6 10.9 05/17/2007 15:48 63.6 10.8 05/17/2007 15:54 60.8 10.8 05/17/2007 16:00 60 10.8 05/17/2007 16:06 64.9 10.9 05/17/2007 16:12 61.1 10.9 05/17/2007 16:18 62.9 10.9 05/17/2007 16:24 61.2 10.8 05/17/2007 16:30 59.6 10.7 05/17/2007 16:36 64 10.9 05/17/2007 16:42 59.9 10.8 05/17/2007 16:48 63.2 10.9 05/17/2007 16:54 64.4 11 05/17/2007 17:00 60.9 10.9 05/17/2007 17:06 63.9 11 05/17/2007 17:12 64.1 11.1 05/17/2007 17:18 62.1 11 05/17/2007 17:24 65.8 11 05/17/2007 17:30 62.6 11 05/17/2007 17:36 64.5 11 05/17/2007 17:42 67 11.1 05/17/2007 17:48 62.5 11.1 05/17/2007 17:54 64.8 11 05/17/2007 18:00 65.5 11 05/17/2007 18:06 60.2 11 05/17/2007 18:12 64.3 11.1 05/17/2007 18:18 66.1 11.1 A verages: 64.267 10.855

Page 3 of 3

## APPENDIX E

FUEL ANALYSIS

## Laboratory Services 5012 Causeway Blvd * Tampa Fl. 33619 * Ph (813)630-7378 * Fax (813)630-7360 * DOH #E54272 Report For: 

## Laboratory ID: AA87628

Date and Time Collected: Sampled By: 

### Sample Information
ASG/BB W&F Description 

### Location Code: 6/27/2007 Report Date:

Big Bend 3 Compliance 

### TE_BB_3_COMP_COAL

Project Account Code: 4/10/2007 Date of Sample Receipt: Sample Collection Method: 

### Laboratory Results 4/10/2007 12:00:00 AM

Result PARAMETER Qualifier Code Test

Method Analyst Units Upper Limit MDL Violation Check Analysis Date & Time Lower

Limit 60 Mesh Residual Moisture, Coal % ASTM D-5142 KAPXJ 3.97 4/16/2007 12:10:00 PM
Ash, as Received % 0.01 ASTM D-3174 KAPXJ 8.65 4/17/2007 2:31:00 PM
Ash, Dry Basis % 0.01 ASTM D-3174 KAPXJ 9.62 4/17/2007 2:31:00 PM
BTU, as Received BTU/Lb 100 ASTM D-5865 KAPXJ 11885 4/24/2007 12:04:00 PM
BTU, Dry Basis BTU/Lb. 100 ASTM D-5865 KAPXJ 13219 4/24/2007 12:04:00 PM
BTU, Moisture-Ash Free BTU/Lb. 100 ASTM D-5865 KAPXJ 14626 4/24/2007 12:04:00 PM
Calculated Heat Input, mmBtu/hr mmBtu/hr KARAM 3908 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Acetone Beaker, Run 1 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 2.75 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Acetone Beaker, Run 2 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 1.35 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Acetone Beaker, Run 3 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 3.50 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Acetone Beaker, Run 4 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 4.20 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Acetone Beaker, Run 5 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 6.65 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Acetone Beaker, Run 6 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 13.75 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Filter/Thimble, Run 1 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 14.03 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Filter/Thimble, Run 2 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 14.45 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Filter/Thimble, Run 3 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 16.30 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Filter/Thimble, Run 4 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 17.15 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Filter/Thimble, Run 5 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 16.00 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Filter/Thimble, Run 6 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 15.10 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Total Sample, Run 1 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 17.05 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Total Sample, Run 2 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 15.80 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Total Sample, Run 3 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 19.80 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Total Sample, Run 4 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 21.35 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Total Sample, Run 5 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 22.65 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Particulate Wt., Total Sample, Run 6 mg 0.0001 EPA Method 5B/17 KARAM 28.85 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
PM non-sootblowing, lbs/mmBtu lb/mmBtu EPA RM-5/17 KARAM 0.01 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
PM sootblowing, lbs/mmBtu lb/mmBtu EPA RM-5/17 KARAM 0.02 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Report Number: Page 1 of 2 "General Report"

AA87628-062707-08

## Laboratory Services 5012 Causeway Blvd * Tampa Fl. 33619 * Ph (813)630-7378 * Fax (813)630-7360 * DOH #E54272

Result PARAMETER Qualifier Code Test

Method Analyst Units Upper Limit MDL Violation Check Analysis Date & Time Lower

Limit
Pounds SO2 / Million BTU Lbs. SO2/MMBTU Calculated KAPXJ 4.98 4/24/2007 12:04:00 PM

SO2 emission rate, lbs/hr lbs/hr EPA - RM6C KARAM 693 5/8/2007 3:35:00 PM
Sulfur, as Received % 0.02 ASTM D-4239 KAPXJ 3.12 4/17/2007 2:28:00 PM
Sulfur, Dry Basis % 0.08 ASTM D-4239 KAPXJ 3.47 4/17/2007 2:28:00 PM

Total Moisture % 0.1 ASTM D-3173 KAPXJ 10.09 4/17/2007 2:28:00 PM



### Comments

Robert Dorey, Manager, Laboratory Services All results calculated on a wet to wet basis, unless otherwise indicated. Should there be any questions regarding this report, please contact:

(813) 630-7878

Report Number: Page 2 of 2 "General Report"

AA87628-062707-08

## APPENDIX F

FIELD DATA SHEETS

## APPENDIX G

SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS

## SUMMARY OF E Q UIPMENT CALIBRATION S

EQUIPMENT CAL DATE METHOD RESULTS
CONSOLE (MB 06) INITIA L 04/03/2007 USEPA RM 5 0.979 POST TEST 05/18/2007 (ORIFICE) 0.989
NOZZLE (SN09) INITIA L 04/03/2007 CALIPER 0.273 POST TEST 05/18/2007 MEASUREMENTS 0.272
PYROMETER (PY 10) 04/02/2007 ASTM THERMOMETER + 2 o 

### F
PITOT TUBE (PT 05) 04/04/2007 USEPA RM 2 C p 

### = 0.84
BAROMETER (BR 07) 05/07/2007 NWS COMPARISON + 0.01" Hg

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

Blue Team Manufacturer: Thermo Anderson Calibration Date: Model Number:MST-C1 Barometric Pressure: 30.16 "Hg Instrument Code Number: ^MB07 Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 14.23 "Hg LabWorks Sample Number: Calibrated By:

Initial Final Total Δ H Time Volume Volume Volume Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet "H 2 

### O Minutes ft 3 

### ft 3 

### ft 3 

### oF oF oF oF 0.60 15 316.900 323.813 6.913 78 77 77 76 1.10 15 304.500 313.726 9.226 78 78 78 77 1.90 15 292.050 303.965 11.915 84 80 83 78 3.50 15 271.800 288.080 16.280 86 80 88 80

Orifice K' A ctual Serial Orifice Vacuum Initial Final Average Number Coefficient "Hg oF oF oF 48 0.3455 22.0 72 72 72.0 55 0.4592 20.5 72 72 72.0 63 0.5877 19.0 72 72 72.0 73 0.8022 16.0 72 72 72.0
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Calibration Volume Volume Volume Y Δ H α Corrected Corrected Nominal Value QA/QC Value QA/QC Vm (std) , ft 3 Vcr (std) , ft 3 Vcr (std) , ft 3 

### (ratio) + 0.02 "H 2 

### O + 0.2

6.859 6.777 6.776 0.988 0.005 1.639 -0.078 9.152 9.007 9.006 0.984 0.001 1.699 -0.019 11.766 11.527 11.527 0.980 -0.003 1.780 0.062 16.072 15.734 15.734 0.979 -0.004 1.752 0.035 Averages: 0.983 1.717

Review/Approval:

For Calibration Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration orifice to the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance from average is + 0.02. For Calibration Δ H α , the acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is + 0.2.


### 10-Apr-07 Critical Orifice Readings Ambient Temperatures

CALCULATED DATA Critical Orifice The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K', should be in English units. 

### IMPORTANT Dry Gas Meter Readings Initial Temperatures Final Tempertures 04/03/2007

SEG

IMPORTANT For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 "Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum Shown above. 

### USEPA Reference Method 5

Dry Gas Meter Calibration

Critical Orifice Method Quarterly Calibration

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

Manufacturer: THERMO Calibration Date: Model Number:MST Barometric Pressure: 29.93 "Hg Instrument Code Number: MB06 Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 14.12 "Hg LabWorks Sample Number: Calibrated By: A ssociated Test: Team: RED

Initial Final Total Δ H Time Volume Volume Volume Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet "H 2 

### O Minutes ft 3 

### ft 3 

### ft 3 

### oF oF oF oF

1.2 10 8.900 15.040 6.140 81 76 81 76 1.2 10 15.040 21.169 6.129 81 76 82 76 1.2 10 21.169 27.295 6.126 82 76 82 76

Orifice K' A ctual Serial Orifice Vacuum Initial Final Average Number Coefficient "Hg oF oF oF 55 0.4592 22.5 72 72 72.0 55 0.4592 22.5 72 72 72.0 55 0.4592 22.5 72 72 72.0

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Calibration Volume Volume Volume Y Δ H α Corrected Corrected Nominal Value QA/QC Value QA/QC Vm (std) , ft 3 Vcr (std) , ft 3 Vcr (std) , ft 3 

### (ratio) + 0.02 "H 2 

### O + 0.2

6.038 5.959 6.004 0.987 -0.002 1.865 0.001 6.024 5.959 6.004 0.989 0.000 1.864 0.000 6.018 5.959 6.004 0.990 0.001 1.863 -0.001 Averages: 0.989 1.864 Prior Y: 0.979 % Difference: -0.99%

Review/Approval: Date: 21-May-07 CALCULATED DATA

For Calibration Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration orifice to the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance from average is + 0.02. For Calibration Δ H α , the acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is + 0.2. 

### Critical Orifice 

### USEPA Reference Method 5

Dry Gas Meter Calibration

Critical Orifice Method

SEG 05/18/2007 

### POST - TEST CALIBRATION CHECK

Ambient Temperatures Dry Gas Meter Readings Final Tempertures Initial Temperatures

Critical Orifice Readings IMPORTANT

IMPORTANT For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 "Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum Shown above. The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K', should be in English units.

### Environmental Service s A ir Services Grou p

QUARTERLY NOZZLE CALIBRATIONS Shared Resource STEEL NOZZLE SET Calibration Date: 04/03/2007 Responsible Party: SEG

Nozzle Nozzle Diameter, D n Maximum 

### (cm) Average I.D. D 1 

### D 2 

### D 3 Difference, " 

### D n 

### , inches ^SN01 0.289 0.295 0.294 0.002 0.115 ^SN04 0.321 0.322 0.322 0.000 0.127 ^SN05 0.377 0.383 0.380 0.002 0.150 ^SN06 0.496 0.497 0.498 0.001 0.196 ^SN09 0.691 0.697 0.693 0.002 0.273 ^SN10 0.752 0.754 0.755 0.001 0.297 ^SN12 0.985 0.986 0.986 0.000 0.388 ^SN15 0.418 0.419 0.419 0.000 0.165 ^SN16 0.500 0.501 0.502 0.001 0.197 ^SN19 0.711 0.716 0.715 0.002 0.281 ^SN22 0.931 0.932 0.931 0.000 0.367 ^SN30 0.796 0.795 0.794 0.001 0.313 ^SN36 0.474 0.477 0.476 0.001 0.187 ^SN37 0.533 0.530 0.531 0.001 0.209 ^SN38 0.635 0.635 0.634 0.000 0.250 ^SN46 0.483 0.484 0.483 0.000 0.190 ^SN47 0.516 0.517 0.516 0.000 0.203 ^SN48 0.636 0.635 0.634 0.001 0.250 ^SN50 0.789 0.787 0.788 0.001 0.310 ^SN58 0.610 0.616 0.610 0.002 0.241 ^SN68 0.624 0.626 0.629 0.002 0.247 ^SN69 0.954 0.952 0.955 0.001 0.375 ^SN70 1.561 1.561 1.562 0.000 0.615 ^SN71 1.555 1.559 1.559 0.002 0.613 ^SN72 0.957 0.958 0.955 0.001 0.377 ^SN73 1.282 1.285 1.285 0.001 0.506 ^SN74 1.238 1.239 1.237 0.001 0.487 Data Notations: All micometer readings are converted from cm to inches by multiplying by 0.393700787. Maximum Difference must be < 0.004".



### QA/QC Review by: 10-Apr-07

### Environmental Service s A ir Services Grou p

POST TEST NOZZLE CALIBRATION Shared Resource Calibration Date: 05/18/2007 

### Calibration Personnel: SEG 

### Test Designation: BB UNIT 1



### Nozzle Nozzle Diameter, D n Maximum 

### (cm) Average Identifier D 1 

### D 2 

### D 3 Difference, " 

### D n 

### , inches

SN 09 0.690 0.689 0.690 0.000 0.272

Data Notations: All micometer readings are converted from cm to inches by multiplying by 0.393700787. Maximum Difference must be < 0.004".



### Quarterly (pre-test) value for nozzle ID SN 09 was 0.273

Difference (Pre-test/Post-test) is: 0.001

QA/QC Review by: 21-May-07

### Environmental Services A ir Services Group Pyrometer Calibration Red Team Pyrometer Under Tes t Pyrometer Number: ^PY10 Labworks Sample # n/a Calibration Date: 04/02/2007

Calibrator Information Calibrator Type/Manufacturer: Hart Scientific Calibrator Serial Number: A OA024 Date of Last Calibration: 01/03/2007 Calibration Personnel (Typed and Signature): J.A.Varino

Calibration Data

Calibration Reference Pyrometer Point Temperature Indication Difference

1 

### 400 398 2 2 

### 212 212 0 3 

### 32 32 0

Reference temperatures must encompass the expected range of measurement. These three points should be ~ 32 degrees, ~212 degrees, and ~ 400 degrees Farenheit. Difference is calculated as follows:

(reference temperature ) – (pyrometer indication )

Qaulity Control Data

Calibration Point Difference

1 

### Pass 2 

### Pass 3 

### Pass

Reviewer: 

### 10-Apr-07Environmental Services Air Services Group

_ _

s PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION DATA SHEET

Pitot Tube ID # PT05 Calibration Dat e 04/04/2007 Operating Quarter/Year: 07-Apr Red Team Openings Damaged?

___ Y

__ N Repaired?

___ Y ___ N ___ N/A

Labworks #: 0

Alpha and Beta Angle Determinations Acceptable Limits:

α 1 0.6 degrees Pass Dt 0.48 < Dt > 0.95 cm

α 2 1.1 degrees Pass α < 10 degrees β 1 0.3 degrees Pass ( α 1 measured across top impact openings) β 2 1 degrees Pass ( α 2 measured across bottom impact openings) β 1 < 5 degrees (alongside top impact openings) Gamma, Theta, Α
, Ζ
, and W Determination β 2 < 5 degrees (alongside bottom impact openings)

ψ 0.1 degrees Ζ < 0.32 cm ( Α sin ψ ) Α 2.292 cm W < 0.08 cm (Asin ο ) Ζ 0.004 cm Pass Α distance between tips

ο angle of plane on side of pitots

ο 1.3 degrees ψ angle between tips W 0.052 cm Pass

NOTES

All measurements are taken in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods, Method 2, "Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (Type S pitot tube)". Measurement details are found in EPA/600/4-77/027b, "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Stationary Source Specific Methods", sub-section 3.1.1, Procuement of Apparatus and Supplies.

Comments: REMOVABLE

Calibrated by: SEG/GB

Quality Assurance Review / Approval:

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

BAROMETER CALIBRATION Blue Team Instrument Number: ^BR07 Calibration Date: 05/07/2007 Calibration Personnel: SEG Labworks #: Barometer Readin g Reference Readin g Difference T ime Inches Mercury Inches Mercury "H g 8:35 30.1 30.08 0.02 9:50 30.12 30.08 0.04 10:55 30.1 30.08 0.02

Avera g e Difference: 0.02667

Note: Barometric readin g s must a g ree within ± 0.1 "H g

. Current Reference is National Weather Service, TIA. Current Conditions at Tampa International Airport Comments (Note any ad j ustments):

QA/QC Review by: Date: 11-May-07

## APPENDIX H

CHAIN OF CUSTODY

## APPENDIX I

TEST PARTICIPANTS

## TEST PARTICIPANTS

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AIR SERVICES GROUP Test Team Jorge Varino Environmental Technician, Test Team Lead
Scott Given Associate Technician Gary Barber Associate Technician
Process Data Curtis Seebaran Engin eer – Big Bend Station Sample Analysis Samraing Soth Environmental Technician
Patrece Jackson Environmental Technician
Ellen Demers Environmental Technician Project Quality Objectives & Reporting Ray McDarby Senior Environmental Technician
BIG BEND STATION Test Coordination Curtis Seebaran Engin eer – Big Bend Station David A. Smith Coordinator – Air Services Group