alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 299

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 28, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2506) to amend title IX of the Public Health

Service Act to revise and extend the Agency for Health Care

Policy and Research. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Commerce. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

Commerce now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. No amendment to the committee amendment
2

•HRES 299 EH

in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those

printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated

for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro

forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so printed may be offered only by the Member who

caused it to be printed or his designee and shall be considered

as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may:

(1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the

Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 299 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2006224EN.01001101.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Freiburg — Germany) — Bernd Voigt

(Case C-83/05) (1)

1

(Completion of the internal market - Approximation of laws - Motor vehicles - Community type-approval procedure - Directive 70/156/EEC - Scope - Classification according to the technical characteristics of vehicle types - Effect on vehicle classification of a national regulation governing road traffic)

(2006/C 224/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Freiburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bernd Voigt

Applicant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Amtsgericht Freiburg — Interpretation of Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers (OJ, English Special Edition 1970 (I), p. 96), as amended by Council Directive 92/53/EEC of 18 June 1992 (OJ 1992 L 225 p. 1) — Registration by a Member State of a category M1 vehicle (passenger car) covered by Community type-approval — Whether the national authorities may penalise the driver of such a vehicle for road traffic offences which relate to goods vehicles — Motorway speed limits applicable solely to goods vehicles

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, as amended by Council Directive 92/53/EEC of 18 June 1992, is to be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national rules which provide that a vehicle such as the one in question in the main proceedings is not subject to the national speed limits for passenger cars, even where that vehicle has been registered as a passenger car on the basis of a Community type-approval granted pursuant to that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 82 of 2.4.2005.

1

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)

**Title:** Debris flows from failures ofNeoglacial-age moraine dams in the Three Sisters and Mount Jefferson Wildernessareas

Report,Plate 1,Plate 2

 
SuDoc:I 19.16:1606
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP system Number:001042599
§ 2.211 What must a response to the statement of reasons include? ( a ) A response to a statement of reasons must comply with § 2.214. In addition, the response must: ( 1 ) State when the interested party or decision-maker submitting the response received the statement of reasons;
( 2 ) Explain how the interested party submitting the response is adversely affected by the decision being appealed or may be adversely affected by the reviewing official's decision; and
( 3 ) Explain why the interested party or decision maker submitting the response believes the arguments made in the appellant's Notice of Appeal and statement of reasons are right or wrong.
( b ) The response may also include statements and documents supporting the position of the interested party or decision-maker submitting.
Phenoxy

But yl Acrylate Preparation Note Phenoxy but yl bromide CAS 1200 - 03 - 9 PMN P - 13 - 0781Phenoxy

But yl Acrylate Mass Balance and Preparation• Add sodium acry late, TBAB, phenoxybutyl bromide, MEHQ and MEK into a

10L glass reactor • Connect stir, condenser, heater and pressure gauge • Start stir (410rpm) • Start heating (set 90C) • The reaction mixture was refluxed for 10hrs • Cool the temperature dow n to 45C • Add hexane into the reactor • Stir the mixture for 10min • Discharge the reaction mixture from the reactor • Filtration through a 10micron filter bag • Collect the filtrate • Wash the filtrate w ith water • Vacuum strip to remove the volatiles (MEK & Hexane)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1606

Neoglacial moraines and glacial positions since the culmination of the Little lee Age—PLATE 1
O'Connor, J, Hardison, J.H, Ill, and Costa, J.E., 2001, Debris flows from failure of neoglacial-age
‘moraine dams in the Three Sisters and Mount Jefferson Wilderness areas, Oregon

Db \ Z ~ & i ¢- RS x = ‘\ WV VS =) Yj
See a
SS 2 | aD

122900"

Bachelor
vy

DK Plate1 777 Plate2

EXPLANATI
Moraine deposits ——-_ Moraine crest
pee Neoglacial lateral and terminal moraines. Predate
18-20th century Little Ice Age moraines, postdate Glacier extent
oecee

**  1949—U.S. Geological Survey aerial photographs
(0Gs- imately 1:40,000

2 KILOMETERS

1 MILES

NOTE: In this report, we use the names on the current U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangles and informally use the nami
“Jack Glacier" and "East Bend Glacier" for the unmapped glaciers or perennial ice masses in the northeast-facing cirques of
Three Fingered Jack and Broken Top.

4

3 OARS 2 i

Pe

a)

ey

7" 46 45) 4a

JANES Vee. aS

9
se
Broken Top, Oregon, 1

Neoglacial-age moraines and historical glacier positions of North, Middle, and South Sister, and Broken Top in the Three Sisters Wilderness Area

121°49'

50°
iS, ~
o a
we &
oy
C) y
o } g
&
GY
l
E Ye
D &
Ce
7ON

48°28! 44°28"
121°52' y 49"

Base from U.5. Geological Survey
1:24,000, Three Fingered Jack, Oregon, 1988,

Neoglacial-age moraines, historical glacier positions and debris flow deposits
of Three Fingered Jack in the Mount Jefferson Wilderness Area

aie ge

)

INNIS 5%

—
—4

Neoglacial-age moraines, historical glacier positions and debris flow deposits
of Mount Jefferson in the Mount Jefferson Wilderness Area

cresne maior 0 NEOGLACIAL MORAINES AND GLACIAL POSITIONS SINCE THE CULMINATION OF THE LITTLE ICE AGE
FOR MOUNT JEFFERSON, THREE FINGERED JACK, AND THE THREE SISTERS WILDERNESS AREA, OREGON
### [§1443. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–425, §1(2)(B), Sept. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 706]

Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 111, related to Board of Actuaries, composed of Government Actuary, Chief Actuary of Social Security Administration, and an actuary who was a member of Society of Actuaries.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 3273 LT Case No. 2020 - CF - 016666 -A 20 20 - CF - 016667 -A 2020 -CF- 016668 -A 2020 - CF - 016669 -A 2020 - CF - 016680 -A 2020 - CF - 012876 -A

__________________________ ___ K ENYA B ROWN , Appellant, v. S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

______________ _______________ 3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Tesha Ballou, Judge. Kenya Brown, Lawtey, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee . February 2 7 , 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). W ALLIS , E ISNAUGLE , and M AC I VER , J J., concur.2 _____________________________ Not fin al until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
No. 9860.

#### The State ex rel. T. L. Broussard vs. The Judge of the Twenty-first District Court.

An interlocutory deorce which admits a reconstructed record to replace a mislaid or destroyed record, does not belong to the class of orders, tbe execution of which can cause irreparable injury and be arrested by a suspensive appeal.

PPLICATION for Mandamus.

*Felix Voorhies*and *Robert 8. Ferry*for the Relator.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

The relator prays that a *mandamus*issue to compel the respondent judge to grant a suspensive appeal from an interlocutory order which was made in the course of the suit of Halphen vs. Guilbeau and Broussard, a contested election case, and which admitted a reconstructed record, to supply one which had been lost, mislaid or destroyed.

The order complained of does not belong to that class of decrees, the execution of which may cause irreparable injury. It simply declares that certain papers and documents shall be taken as substitutes for similar ones which have disappeared, and without which the suit could not be proceeded with. It cannot cause any irreparable wrong, *226and therefore cannot be susp. nsinely appealed from. If it was erroneously rendered, it can be revised and corrected on appeal from a final judgment adverse to relator.

In the case of Halphen vs. Ouilbean and Broussard, 37 Ann. 711, we had occasion to express our views touching the mode of rebuilding or replacing the wanted record.

Tt is uo doubt in furtherance of those views and of the decree in that case that steps were taken to reconstruct tiie disappeared record, and that the decree now complained of was made.

If an appeal, suspensive in character,.was allowable and granted, the whole proceeding’s would necessarily be stayed, until the final determination of the question presented by it and the delay consumed in the meantime would cause great injury to the plaintiff in the sail, if lie be entitled to the, office.

'I'he order complained of, not being one which, by its execution can cause irremedial wrong, cannot be suspensively appealed from.

It is therefore ordered that the application for *umandamm*be refused with costs.
§ 18.207 When do amendments to a tribal probate code become effective? ( a ) An amendment may not become effective sooner than 180 days after the date of approval by the Department.
( b ) If an amendment is deemed approved through inaction by the Department, then the amendment will become effective 180 days after it is deemed approved.
( c ) The amendment will apply only to the estate of a decedent who dies on or after the effective date of the amendment.
### §920a. Art. 120a. Mails: deposit of obscene matter

Any person subject to this chapter who, wrongfully and knowingly, deposits obscene matter for mailing and delivery shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5431, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2951.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 920a was renumbered section 930 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
**Exhibit 3.3**

**CERTIFICATE OFAMENDMENT****OF****AMENDED AND RESTATED****ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION****OF****HUDSON RESPIRATORY CAREINC.**

Charles A. French and Patrick Yount certify that:

1.          They are the duly elected and acting president and secretary, respectively, of Hudson Respiratory Care Inc., a California corporation.

2.          The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation shall beamended by amending the first paragraph of Article III to read as follows:

“The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares of stock to bedesignated respectively, “**Common Stock**” and “**Preferred Stock**;” the total number of such shares shall be forty million (40,000,000); thetotal number of Common Stock shall be thirty-seven million (37,000,000) and the total number of Preferred Stock shall be three million (3,000,000).”

3.          The foregoing amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by the board of directors of theCorporation.

4.          The foregoing amendment of the Amended andRestated Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by the required vote of shareholders in accordance with Section 903 of the California Corporations Code. The total number of outstanding shares of the corporation is 10,654,293 shares ofCommon Stock, and 529,028 shares of Preferred Stock consisting of 526,028 shares of Senior PIK Preferred Stock and 3,000 shares of Junior Preferred Stock. The number of shares voting in favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required.The percentage vote required was more than 50% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and more than 50% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, voting separately as a class.

We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and correct of our own knowledge.

 

| Date: May 16, 2003 |   |   | ****/s/ CHARLES A. FRENCH                         |
|--------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|               |   |   |                                                   |
|                    |   |   | **Charles A. French, President**/s/ PATRICK YOUNT |
|               |   |   |                                                   |
|               |   |   | **Patrick Yount, Secretary**                      |
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                 In connection with theQuarterly Report of ITXC Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the “Report”), I, Edward B. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  
(3)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
 
 
 
(4)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and theconsolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: November 14, 2002

 /S/  EDWARD B. JORDAN
 
**Edward B. Jordan Chief Financial Officer of ITXC Corp.**

          This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §4602. Contracted property and services: prompt payment of vouchers

(a) Requirement.—Of the contract vouchers that are received by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service by means of the mechanization of contract administration services system, the number of such vouchers that remain unpaid for more than 30 days as of the last day of each month may not exceed 5 percent of the total number of the contract vouchers so received that remain unpaid on that day.

(b) Contract Voucher Defined.—In this section, the term "contract voucher" means a voucher or invoice for the payment to a contractor for services or deliverable items provided by the contractor under a contract funded by the Department of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1006(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–247, §2226; amended Pub. L. 111–350, §5(b)(7), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3842; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §836(e)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1869; renumbered §4602, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1861(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4277.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 2226 of this title as this section.

2018—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "for services or deliverable items" for "for services, commercial items (as defined in section 103 of title 41), or other deliverable items".

2011—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–350 substituted "section 103 of title 41" for "section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Jan. 1, 2020, subject to a savings provision, see section 836(h) of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as an Effective Date of 2018 Amendment; Savings Provision note under section 453b of Title 6, Domestic Security.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1006(b)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–248, provided that: "Section 2226 of title 10, United States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 4602] (as added by subsection (a)), shall take effect on December 1, 2000."
§ 183.14 What limits are there on how the Tribe can spend funds? ( a ) The Tribe must spend income distributed from the Lease Fund only in accordance with a written budget submitted under § 183.5.
( b ) The Tribe must not spend the income from the Lease Fund to make per capita payments to members of the Tribe.
### §3723. [Reserved]

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1831(k), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4217; amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(i)(6)(B), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2141.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3723 was renumbered section 7263 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, §1701(i)(6)(B), amended Pub. L. 116–283, §1831(k), which enacted this section, by adding section 3723 designation and catchline "[Reserved]" and striking out former section 3723 designation and catchline "Streamlining awards for innovative technology projects: pilot program".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment made to Pub. L. 116–283 by Pub. L. 117–81, resulting in omission of this section, applicable as if included in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and Effective Date note below.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §7690. Recyclable munitions materials: sale; use of proceeds

(a) Authority for Program.—Notwithstanding section 2577 of this title, the Secretary of the Army may carry out a program to sell recyclable munitions materials resulting from the demilitarization of conventional military munitions without regard to chapter 5 of title 40 and use any proceeds in accordance with subsection (c).

(b) Method of Sale.—The Secretary shall use competitive procedures to sell recyclable munitions materials under this section in a manner consistent with Federal procurement laws and regulations.

(c) Proceeds.—(1) Proceeds from the sale of recyclable munitions materials under this section shall be credited to an account that is specified as being for Army ammunition demilitarization from funds made available for the procurement of ammunition, to be available only for reclamation, recycling, and reuse of conventional military munitions (including research and development and equipment purchased for such purpose).

(2) Amounts credited under this subsection shall be available for obligation for the fiscal year during which the funds are so credited and for three subsequent fiscal years.

(d) Regulations.—The Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out the program established under this section. Such regulations shall be consistent and in compliance with the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.) and the regulations implementing that Act.

(Added Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title III, §353(a), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2161, §4690; renumbered §7690, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Solid Waste Disposal Act, referred to in subsec. (d), is title II of Pub. L. 89–272, Oct. 20, 1965, 79 Stat. 997, as amended generally by Pub. L. 94–580, §2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2795, which is classified generally to chapter 82 (§6901 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6901 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4690 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.